text
stringlengths 2.85k
2.55M
| label
class label 11
classes |
|---|---|
Lightweight Classification of IoT Malware based on Image
Recognition
Jiawei Su
arXiv:1802.03714v1 [cs.CR] 11 Feb 2018
School of Information Science and
Electrical Engineering, Kyushu
University, Japan
[email protected]
Daniele Sgandurra
ISG Smart Card and IoT Security
Centre, Royal Holloway University of
London, UK
[email protected]
Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas
Faculty of Information Science and
Electrical Engineering, Kyushu
University, Japan
[email protected]
Yaokai Feng
Faculty of Information Science and
Electrical Engineering, Kyushu
University, Japan
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
The Internet of Things (IoT) is an extension of the traditional Internet, which allows a very large number of smart devices, such
as home appliances, network cameras, sensors and controllers to
connect to one another to share information and improve user
experiences. Current IoT devices are typically micro-computers
for domain-specific computations rather than traditional functionspecific embedded devices. Therefore, many existing attacks, targeted at traditional computers connected to the Internet, may also
be directed at IoT devices. For example, DDoS attacks have become very common in IoT environments, as these environments
currently lack basic security monitoring and protection mechanisms, as shown by the recent Mirai and Brickerbot IoT botnets. In
this paper, we propose a novel light-weight approach for detecting
DDos malware in IoT environments. We firstly extract one-channel
gray-scale images converted from binaries, and then utilize a lightweight convolutional neural network for classifying IoT malware
families. The experimental results show that the proposed system
can achieve 94.0% accuracy for the classification of goodware and
DDoS malware, and 81.8% accuracy for the classification of goodware and two main malware families.
CCS CONCEPTS
• Network security → IOT network security; • Machine learning → Convolutional neural network;
KEYWORDS
Internet of things, Malware image, Convolutional neural network,
Light-weight detection
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or
classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed
for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation
on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored.
For all other uses, contact the owner/author(s).
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
© 2018 Copyright held by the owner/author(s).
ACM ISBN 978-x-xxxx-xxxx-x/YY/MM.
https://doi.org/10.1145/nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
Sanjiva Prasad
Department of Computer Science and
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Delhi, India
[email protected]
Kouichi Sakurai
Faculty of Information Science and
Electrical Engineering, Kyushu
University, Japan
[email protected]
ACM Reference Format:
Jiawei Su, Danilo Vasconcellos Vargas, Sanjiva Prasad, Daniele Sgandurra,
Yaokai Feng, and Kouichi Sakurai. 2018. Lightweight Classification of IoT
Malware based on Image Recognition. In Proceedings of ACM Conference
(Conference’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/
nnnnnnn.nnnnnnn
1
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays the notion of the “Internet” has extended from the connection between personal computers to networks composed of
a much larger range of devices. Traditional micro devices, such
as many kinds of sensors and controllers, are typically only able
to perform function-specific tasks based on pre-defined rules. By
substituting these function-specific devices with CPU-controlled
ones, and by enabling interconnection among them through the
Internet, these “things” become “smart” and can now deal with
complex tasks. In addition, by enabling Cloud services on these
smart-devices, users can easily receive data reported by them and
control them.
Despite these advantages, smarter devices imply more vulnerabilities, due to the complexity in hardware and software, with more
chances for potential adversaries to threaten them. In addition, IoT
systems are generally unsecured due to the difficulty of creating
unified standards for the various types of IoT hardware and software platforms. Finally, even if smarter compared with traditional
sensors, IoT devices still lack sufficient computational resources to
be able to use existing PC-based security solutions. In some cases,
Cloud services provide a way for developing security protection
for IoT devices, e.g. for malware detection [18, 19].
In this paper, we consider a solution to protect local IoT devices
from being abused to perform DDoS attacks by being enslaved in
botnets of IoT devices, which is currently a common attack. To
accomplish this, we first classify IoT DDoS malware samples recently collected in the wild on two major families, namely Mirai and
Linux.Gafgyt. We then propose a lightweight solution for detecting
and classifying IoT DDoS malware and benign applications locally
on the IoT devices by converting the program binaries to gray-scale
images, and by feeding these images to a small size convolutional
neural network for classification. In this way, resource-constrained
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington,
Jiawei Su, DC,
Danilo
USA
Vasconcellos Vargas, Sanjiva Prasad, Daniele Sgandurra, Yaokai Feng, and Kouichi Sakurai
IoT devices can afford the computation needed for running the proposed detection system locally. Experimental results show that the
proposed system can achieve 94.0% accuracy for classifying goodware and DDoS malware, and 81.8% accuracy for the classification
of goodware and two main malware families.
The main contributions of this research are the following ones:
• this is the first classification system tested on real IoT malware samples: previous works have used regular or mobile
malware samples instead, due to the difficulty in obtaining
IoT malware samples [2, 11, 13]. Specifically there is currently no publicly available IoT malware dataset and the
first IoT honeypot for collecting samples of IoT threats was
released relatively recently [1];
• the IoT malware classification system can be deployed on
real IoT devices. We show in detail the feasibility of using
lightweight image classifier for recognizing IoT malware
through malware images. Malware image classification has
been proposed for classifying regular malware [4]; however,
IoT malware is functionally different. For example, many IoT
malware may try to kill other malware to guarantee enough
computational resource for themselves;
• according to the experimental results, we prove that the proposed system can reliably classify goodware and IoT DDoS
malware.
• to the best of our knowledge, there is currently no reference
to describe the time complexity of CNNs. However, the proposed CNN-based approach is empirically considered to be
lightweight since it does not need to maintain any training
data for classification, differently from other types of classifiers for malware, such as Support Vector Machine and
K-nearest neighbours. The computation of CNN for classification is rather simple, and only involves summation and
activation. In addition, the proposed system is based on a
two layer shallow network which is much more efficient
than common deep learning models.
The paper is structured as follows. In Sect. 2 we discuss related
work. Sect. 3 explains procedures for extracting IoT DDoS malware
images and implementing a small size convolutional neural network
for classification. In Sect. 4 the detection results in two different
scenarios are listed and in Sect. 5 the achievement of this research
is summarized and future work is discussed.
2
RELATED WORKS
Even if IoT security is an important topic, few defensive solutions
exist in the literature [12]. Only recently, the first honeypot specifically for collecting IoT malware has been established by Pa et al.
[1]. Their honeypot systems simulated 8 different CPU architectures and are built for observing attacks coming through the Telnet
protocol. Initially they collected 43 distinct malware samples which
are mostly DDoS attack malware. Their results show that the DDoS
attack is the most common security threat in current IoT network
environments. These authors kindly shared their observed data set
with us which we have used in this research for evaluating our
proposal.
To the best of our knowledge, while most other works focus on
Android malware detection [24, 25], the“Cloudeye” [2] is in practice
the only current work specific for IoT malware detection. The system is a signature matching-based malware detection solution. IoT
clients are only responsible for preliminary scanning the software
locally, and then sending hashed abstracts of suspicious files to
Cloud servers for deep analysis, therefore guaranteeing data privacy and low-cost communications. However, in IoT environments
the inherent weakness of signature matching-based detection still
exists: for example, Cloudeye is not able to deal with new variants
of existing samples.
Apart from signature matching, machine learning-based malware detection has been proved as effective in various scenarios
[3, 14–16, 22, 23]. In IoT environments, also heavy computation
machine learning methods are expected to be suitable too because
of the availability of Cloud services. In fact, in a possible scenario,
the training can be performed on Cloud server, while resourceconstrained IoT devices can receive the trained classifiers from the
servers and run the algorithm locally. Note that several machine
learning classifiers are heavy at training but efficient during test
phase.
Classifying malware images has been proven as an effective way
for recognizing common PC malware [9, 26]. It is essentially a
method for comparing two malware binaries. Nataraj et al. first utilize malware images for classifying regular Internet malware with knearest neighbors [4]. However, the system requires pre-processing
of filtering to extract the image texture as features for classification,
which might not fit the resource-constrained IoT environments.
Similaly, the artificial neural network (ANN) malware classification
proposed by Makandar [28] might not be a good candidate to be
run on IoT devices to handle due to the heavy computational cost
of multiple fully connected layers in ANN for classification. Yue
utilized convolutional neural network for malware family classification [5]. In this research, we use malware images for IoT malware
classification and show it is a feasible approach.
3
METHODOLOGY
In this Section, we describe the methodology of feeding malware images as features, to a small two-layer convolutional neural network
for detection.
3.1
Lightweight IoT DDoS Malware Filter
For the scenario of detecting IoT DDoS malware detection locally,
as previously pointed out, the main difficulty of deploying malware
filters lies in the fact that the computational resources available
on current IoT devices is limited. A direct solution under such a
condition is relying on the security protection services provided
by powerful remote servers, such as in Cloud-enabled IoT environments. Cloud servers are usually better protected against node
failures, e.g. due to DDoS attacks. Another advantage of using Cloud
servers is that a malware databases can be made more comprehensive and can be updated more rapidly than on IoT devices. For these
reasons, we propose a two-tier detection architecture, based on a
local IoT detection system and a remote, Cloud-based, classification
system. In more detail, firstly a lightweight malware classification
system is responsible of recognizing suspicious programs and behaviors locally. Note that, at this stage, the main goal is to provide
a score on binary suspiciousness.
Lightweight Classification of IoT Malware based on Image Recognition
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
detecting zero-day attacks. Finally, converting malware binaries to
the corresponding images only requires creating the input vectors
to the convolutional neural network, i.e. 8-bit vectors, which is a
very fast operation.
3.4
Figure 1: The proposed light-weight malware detection
scheme. The local detector is located on the client side
and captures potentially suspicious programs by relying on
cloud backend for final decision
• automatic feature extraction: neural network can automatically extract higher level features from the input raw features. That is, the network can learn deep non-linear features
that can be hardly discovered and understood by humanbeings. These are sometimes actually counter-intuitive, but
indeed effective. Note that many previous works have focused on extracting effective features for malware detection.
However, most of them are only effective under specific
scenarios, and this might lead to poor scalability.
• test-phase efficiency: the training progress of a convolutional neural network requires heavy computation and, for
instance, high-end graphic cards are necessary for accelerating training large networks. However, once trained, the
network itself is rather lightweight and can be run with tiny
computational resources, since only the trained parameters
and information of network structure are kept [29, 30]. In
contrast, another supervised lightweight classifier, the oneclass support vector machine (OCSVM), though simpler than
normal Two-class SVM, still needs to keep a certain amount
of training data when running the classification, while a
convolutional neural network does not need to keep any. In
practice, the training can be handled by the Cloud servers
and only the trained network is sent to IoT nodes. On the
local IoT side, the convolutional neural network is run to
detect malware.
In such a case, the system delivers the files or the corresponding
abstracts to a remote Cloud server for deeper analysis. In addition,
the cloud side can update and distribute new trained detectors to the
clients periodically. In the following, we discuss the local malware
filter on the client side. We assume that a set of Cloud servers
are able to analyze malware samples and retrain the classifiers
using standard machine learning algorithms. The proposal system
structure is shown in Fig. 1
3.2
IoT DDoS Malware Families
According to recent observations and preliminary analysis [1], even
if IoT DDoS malware are functionally similar to existing DDoS malware on PC platforms, they contain specific features that are rarely
observed on PCs. For example, some samples try to kill other ones
of competitive families to get more system resources for themselves, due to the limited computational capability of IoT devices.
In addition, IoT malware often target a wide range of devices, such
as Internet cameras, DVR and so on. Finally, IoT malware can be
also compatible with different processor architectures, ensuring the
maximum possible successful infections.
3.3
Malware Image Classification
An interesting and novel way of performing malware classification is to analyze their converted binary images. In particular, a
malware binary can be reformatted as an 8-bit sequence and then
be converted to a gray-scale image which has one channel and
pixel values from 0 to 255 [4]. The resulting image can then be
fed into machine learning image classifiers for classification. Note
that running machine learning classifiers typically needs fewer
local storage than signature-matching systems, which is the most
common used malware detection method. This is important for
storage-constrained IoT devices. In fact, in a matching signatures
system, the signature database is typically large in size as it has
to contain information for each malware sample and all of its possible variants. In the case of machine learning, little information
has to be kept for classification. For example, k-means clustering
needs only the information of centroids and radii for classification
once trained. Support vector machine merely keeps a small set of
training data (i.e., the support vectors) in the test phase. In addition, machine learning methods overcome signature matching on
Neural Network for Malware Detection
Convolutional neural networks have been proven to have better performance for image recognition than many other kinds of classifiers.
A convolutional neural network has two important characteristics
that make it fit the scenario of preliminary filtering malware on
local IoT devices:
4
EXPERIMENT AND RESULTS
In this section we discuss the experimental setup and the results of
the classification of the proposed system.
4.1
Preparing the Dataset
For these experiments, we have used an IoT DDoS malware dataset
newly collected by IoTPOT [1], the first honeypot for collecting IoT
threat samples. The malware samples are labelled using VirusTotal
[8] with the majority rule. The dataset originally contains 500 malware samples, where most of them are classified into four big families: Linux.Gafgyt.1, Linux.Gafgyt (other variants of Linux.Gafgyt
family) , Mirai [10] and Trojan.Linux.Fgt. The rest of the samples
belong to relatively rare families such as Tsunami, Hajime, LightAidra. Then we cluster the samples into two categories: Mirai family, which contains Mirai and Trojan.Linux.Fgt1 , and Linux.Gafgyt
family which contains Linux.Gafgyt.1 and the other variants. Instead, the benign binary samples (goodware) are collected from
1 Mirai
has been shown to have similar features to Trojan.Linux.Fgt [17].
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington,
Jiawei Su, DC,
Danilo
USA
Vasconcellos Vargas, Sanjiva Prasad, Daniele Sgandurra, Yaokai Feng, and Kouichi Sakurai
convolution layer(kernel=3, stride=1, depth=32)
max pooling layer(kernel=2, stride=2)
convolution layer(kernel=3, stride = 1, depth=72)
max pooling layer(kernel=2, stride=2)
fully connected layer(size=256)
softmax classifier
Table 1: Structure of the Implemented Convolutional Neural
Network
Ubuntu 16.04.3 system files. The number of samples are balanced
for each family by randomly removing the samples that belong to
classes that are too large. After the preprocessing phase, we analyzed 365 samples where each class has the same number of samples.
Among them, we utilize 45 sample (each class has 15 samples) for
testing, and the rest for training. According to the discussion above,
the system proposed is only responsible for preliminary detection.
That is, the goal is to identify whether a sample is benign or belongs
to one of the big malware families: Mirai and Linux.Gafgyt, but
there is no need to understand exactly which kind of variant it is.
4.2
Obtaining the Malware Images
We then convert each sample of the dataset into the corresponding
malware gray-scale image by following the same procedures implemented in [4]. In particular, a malware binary can be reformatted
as an 8-bit string sequence, whose decimal encoding represents the
value of a one-channel pixel (in the range [0, 255]). Therefore the entire sequence represents a gray-scale image. We rescale the images
to the size of 64X64 to be used as input to a convolutional neural
network. Some examples of malware and benign-ware images are
shown by Fig. 2, 3 and 4. In these images, the structural difference
between malware and goodware images can be easily identified.
For example, it can be seen that malware images always are more
dense. In particular, the majority of the Mirai malware images have
a dense central code payload. On the other hand, the images of
goodware tend to have larger header parts than malwares.
4.3
Convolutional Neural Network
Configuration
To have a lightweight detection system, we have implemented a
small, two layer shallow convolutional neural network, compared
with common image recognition models, such as ImageNet [20] and
VGG [7]. The network structure is shown in Table. 1. The network
is trained with 5000 iterations with a training batch size of 32 and
learning rate 0.0001.
4.4
Results
The classification results are shown in Tables 2 and 3 for the cases
of two (benign and malicious) and three-class (benign and two
malware families: Mirai and gafgyt) classification. The experiments
were conducted five times which each time with a completely different training/test data combination (i.e., there are no shared test
samples between any two of five test data sets).
Figure 2: Images of Goodware
PP
PPPredict Benign
PP
True
P
Benign
Gafgyt
Mirai
94.67%
6.67%
0%
Gafgyt
Mirai
2.67%
72.00%
21.33%
2.67%
21.33%
78.67%
Table 2: Confusion Matrix for 3-class Classification
PPPredict Benign
PP
True
P
Benign
94.67%
Malicious
6.67%
PP
Malicious
5.33%
93.33%
Table 3: Confusion Matrix for 2-class Classification
According to the results of two-class classification, we find the
proposed system can predict the existence of maliciousness with
about 94.0% accuracy on the average. The accuracy of three-class
Lightweight Classification of IoT Malware based on Image Recognition
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
Figure 4: Malware Image Examples of the Mirai Family
Figure 3: Malware Image Examples of the Linux.Gafgyt Family
Class
Time consumption in second
Goodware
0.0241
Gafgyt
0.0011
Mirai
0.0003
Table 4: Practical results of time complexity for classifying
one image of goodware and two malware families.
classification is relatively lower. Specifically, there are 6.67% malicious samples that are mis-classified as benign, all of which belong
to Gafgyt family, while there is no misclassification of Mirai family
to benign. This indicate the Gafgyt has more similar binaries to
goodware. On the other side, the rate of misclassification between
Mirai and Gafgyt is exactly the same. Generally, the difference between benign and malicious samples is more recognizable than the
difference between two malware families. Comparing with misclassification between benign and malicious samples (i.e., two-class
classification), the system is more likely to misclassify the samples
of two malware families in the case of three-class classification.
This indicates the similarity between these two families. Specifically, samples of two families might be obfuscated in similar ways,
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington,
Jiawei Su, DC,
Danilo
USA
Vasconcellos Vargas, Sanjiva Prasad, Daniele Sgandurra, Yaokai Feng, and Kouichi Sakurai
XXX
Systems
XXX
XXX
Metrics
Accuracy
Classifier
Num of layers
Num of nodes
Fully connect layer
Preprocess
Input dimension
Our method
ANN with random projection [5]
Weighted loss [3]
94.0%
CNN
2
104
256
Re-organizing binary
64X64 scalar matrix
99.5%
ANN
2
1536
2048
N-gram binary, Random projection
179 thousand binaries
96.9%
CNN (VGG-s)
5
1888
4096X2
Re-organizing binary
Unknown
Table 5: Comparing proposed system with two previous related works. In particular, the number of hidden layers, number of
neurons and the number of nodes in fully connect layers, are shown by “Num of Layers”,“Num of nodes”,“Fully connect layer”
respectively. It can be seen that the proposed system is more lightweight than references due to the smaller size of network
model and lower dimensions of input, as well as simpler preprocessing.
or/and share a part of the malicious functions. In fact, the basic
botnet functions of different DDoS malware are similar, and mainly
include receiving instructions from the control server and spreading the infection. Also consider that Mirai source code has been
available online since its beginning, and several new families of IoT
botnets include some portions of Mirai code. In addition, IoT malware has to be lightweight and their functions have to be relatively
direct and simple.
Our accuracy results compete with similar previous works [3, 5].
In specific, Yue [5] also utilized convolutional neural networks and
malware images for classifying several PC malware families. However the results are carried out by using much bigger and complex
network structures, namely very deep networks (VGG) which contain more than 10 layers while ours only has two layers. Similarly, a
very complex preprocess procedure is needed in [5] which involves
initial feature selection and random projection while our proposal
directly uses raw features for classification. According to the accuracy results, the proposed system can be utilized as a regular
malware detector, or a first-stage malware classifier. That is, it can
perform a precise classification to identify benign and maliciousness .The exact classification of the malware family can then be
performed on a Cloud backend. A comparison of corresponding experimental accuracy and settings is shown by Table 5. The practical
time cost of classifying images is depicted in Table 4. In detail, the
experiment is conducted with python and tensorflow on a system
running Ubuntu 14.04, with a i7-7700 processor, GTX1080Ti graphic
card and 16G memory. The code of this research can be found in:
https://github.com/Carina02/IotMalwareImage.
5
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
In this paper we have proposed a lightweight malware image classification scheme for locally detecting IoT DDoS malware, and shown
its feasibility. The malware filter proposed in this paper is based
on convolutional neural networks and can be tuned to be more
efficient by using various techniques of reducing network size. For
example, removing the neurons and links that are not critical in
the network can reduce the number of parameters needed for classification [21]. Such further optimization can make the proposed
system implementable on IoT devices with even less computation
resources. In addition, new malware image extraction methods can
be proposed to obtain more representative features of malware for
classification.
For improving the detection rate of IoT malware, more complicated cases in practice can be considered such as malware obfuscation. To the best knowledge, there is currently no systematical evaluation on IoT malware obfuscation and several critical questions
are yet to be answered, such as whether IoT malware is obfuscated
in a similar way to traditional malware, and how limited resources
influence obfuscation methods.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was partially supported by Collaboration Hubs for
International Program (CHIRP) of SICORP, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), and Project of security in the IoT space funding by Department of Science and Technology (DST), India.
REFERENCES
[1] Pa, Y.M.P., Suzuki, S., Yoshioka, K., Matsumoto, T., Kasama, T. and Rossow, C.,
2015. IoTPOT: analysing the rise of IoT compromises. EMU, 9, p.1.
[2] Sun, H., Wang, X., Buyya, R. and Su, J., 2017. CloudEyes: Cloud based malware
detection with reversible sketch for resource constrained internet of things (IoT)
devices. Software: Practice and Experience, 47(3), pp.421-441.
[3] Dahl, G.E., Stokes, J.W., Deng, L. and Yu, D., 2013, May. Large-scale malware
classification using random projections and neural networks. In Acoustics, Speech
and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2013 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 34223426). IEEE.
[4] Nataraj, L., Karthikeyan, S., Jacob, G. and Manjunath, B.S., 2011, July. Malware
images: visualization and automatic classification. In Proceedings of the 8th international symposium on visualization for cyber security (p. 4). ACM.
[5] Yue, S., 2017. Imbalanced Malware Images Classification: a CNN based Approach.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.08042.
[6] LeCun, Y., 2015. LeNet-5, convolutional neural networks. URL: http://yann. lecun.
com/exdb/lenet.
[7] Simonyan, K. and Zisserman, A., 2014. Very deep convolutional networks for
large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556.
[8] Https://www.virustotal.com/
[9] Wagner, M., Fischer, F., Luh, R., Haberson, A., Rind, A., Keim, D.A., Aigner, W.,
Borgo, R., Ganovelli, F. and Viola, I., 2015. A survey of visualization systems for
malware analysis. In EG Conference on Visualization (EuroVis)-STARs (pp. 105-125).
[10] Kolias, C., Kambourakis, G., Stavrou, A. and Voas, J., 2017. DDoS in the ioT: Mirai
and other botnets. Computer, 50(7), pp.80-84.
[11] Alam, M.S. and Vuong, S.T., 2013, August. Random forest classification for detecting android malware. In Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom),
2013 IEEE and Internet of Things (iThings/CPSCom), IEEE International Conference
on and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (pp. 663-669). IEEE.
[12] Zhang, Z.K., Cho, M.C.Y., Wang, C.W., Hsu, C.W., Chen, C.K. and Shieh, S., 2014,
November. IoT security: ongoing challenges and research opportunities. In ServiceOriented Computing and Applications (SOCA), 2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on (pp. 230-234). IEEE.
Lightweight Classification of IoT Malware based on Image Recognition
[13] Ham, H.S., Kim, H.H., Kim, M.S. and Choi, M.J., 2014. Linear SVM-based android
malware detection for reliable IoT services. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014.
[14] Firdausi, I., Erwin, A. and Nugroho, A.S., 2010, December. Analysis of machine
learning techniques used in behavior-based malware detection. In Advances in Computing, Control and Telecommunication Technologies (ACT), 2010 Second International Conference on (pp. 201-203). IEEE.
[15] Ahmed, F., Hameed, H., Shafiq, M.Z. and Farooq, M., 2009, November. Using
spatio-temporal information in API calls with machine learning algorithms for malware detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Security and artificial
intelligence (pp. 55-62). ACM.
[16] Shamili, A.S., Bauckhage, C. and Alpcan, T., 2010, August. Malware detection on
mobile devices using distributed machine learning. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR),
2010 20th International Conference on (pp. 4348-4351). IEEE.
[17] Hallman, R., Bryan, J., Palavicini, G., Divita, J. and Romero-Mariona, J., 2017.
IoDDoS The Internet of Distributed Denial of Sevice Attacks.
[18] Burguera, I., Zurutuza, U. and Nadjm-Tehrani, S., 2011, October. Crowdroid:
behavior-based malware detection system for android. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM
workshop on Security and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices (pp. 15-26).
ACM.
[19] Masud, M.M., Al-Khateeb, T.M., Hamlen, K.W., Gao, J., Khan, L., Han, J. and
Thuraisingham, B., 2011. Cloud-based malware detection for evolving data streams.
ACM transactions on management information systems (TMIS), 2(3), p.16.
[20] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E., 2012. Imagenet classification with
deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing
systems (pp. 1097-1105).
[21] Pan, W., Dong, H. and Guo, Y., 2016. DropNeuron: Simplifying the Structure of
Deep Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.07326.
[22] Shabtai, A., Moskovitch, R., Elovici, Y. and Glezer, C., 2009. Detection of malicious
code by applying machine learning classifiers on static features: A state-of-the-art
survey. information security technical report, 14(1), pp.16-29.
[23] Siddiqui, M., Wang, M.C. and Lee, J., 2008, March. A survey of data mining
techniques for malware detection using file features. In Proceedings of the 46th
annual southeast regional conference on xx (pp. 509-510). ACM.
[24] Schmidt, A.D., Bye, R., Schmidt, H.G., Clausen, J., Kiraz, O., Yuksel, K.A., Camtepe,
S.A. and Albayrak, S., 2009, June. Static analysis of executables for collaborative
malware detection on android. In Communications, 2009. ICC’09. IEEE International
Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
[25] Felt, A.P., Finifter, M., Chin, E., Hanna, S. and Wagner, D., 2011, October. A survey
of mobile malware in the wild. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security
and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices (pp. 3-14). ACM.
[26] Makandar, A. and Patrot, A., 2018. Trojan Malware Image Pattern Classification.
In Proceedings of International Conference on Cognition and Recognition (pp. 253262). Springer, Singapore.
[27] Makandar, A. and Patrot, A., 2015. Overview of malware analysis and detection.
In IJCA proceedings on national conference on knowledge, innovation in technology
and engineering, NCKITE (Vol. 1, pp. 35-40).
[28] Makandar, A. and Patrot, A., 2015, December. Malware analysis and classification
using Artificial Neural Network. In Trends in Automation, Communications and
Computing Technology (I-TACT-15), 2015 International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp.
1-6). IEEE.
[29] Wang, S.C., 2003. Artificial neural network. In Interdisciplinary computing in
java programming (pp. 81-100). Springer, Boston, MA.
[30] Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. and Hinton, G.E., 2012. Imagenet classification with
deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing
systems (pp. 1097-1105).
Conference’17, July 2017, Washington, DC, USA
| 1cs.CV
|
Secure Adaptive Group Testing
Alejandro Cohen
∗ Department
∗
Asaf Cohen
∗
Sidharth Jaggi
†
Omer Gurewitz∗
of Communication Systems Engineering, Ben-Gurion University, Israel, {alejandr, coasaf, gurewitzs}@bgu.ac.il
of Information Engineering, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, [email protected]
arXiv:1801.04735v1 [cs.IT] 15 Jan 2018
† Department
Abstract—Group Testing (GT) addresses the problem of identifying a small subset of defective items from a large population, by
grouping items into as few test pools as possible. In Adaptive GT
(AGT), outcomes of previous tests can influence the makeup of
future tests. This scenario has been studied from an information
theoretic point of view. Aldridge 2012 showed that in the regime
of a few defectives, adaptivity does not help much, as the number
of tests required for identification of the set of defectives is
essentially the same as for non-adaptive GT.
Secure GT considers a scenario where there is an eavesdropper
who may observe a fraction δ of the outcomes, and should not be
able to infer the status of the items. In the non-adaptive scenario,
the number of tests required is 1/(1 − δ) times the number of
tests without the secrecy constraint.
In this paper, we consider Secure Adaptive GT. Specifically,
when an adaptive algorithm has access to a private feedback
link of rate Rf , we prove that the number of tests required
for both correct reconstruction at the legitimate user, with high
probability, and negligible mutual information at the eavesdropper is 1/min{1, 1 − δ + Rf } times the number of tests required
with no secrecy constraint. Thus, unlike non-secure GT, where
an adaptive algorithm has only a mild impact, under a security
constraint it can significantly boost performance. A key insight
is that not only the adaptive link should disregard test results
and send keys, these keys should be enhanced through a “secret
sharing" scheme before usage.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Group Testing (GT) was introduced in the seminal study by
Dorfman to identify syphilis infected draftees while dramatically reducing the number of required assays [1]. Specifically,
the objective of GT is to identify a small subset of K
unknown defective items within a much larger set of N items,
conducting as few measurements T as possible.
This problem has been analyzed in various scenarios [2],
one of which, Non-Adaptive Group Testing (NGT), is when the
entire pooling strategy is decided on beforehand. This scenario
has also been formulated as a channel coding problem, e.g.,
[3]–[6], where each codeword is associated with the pool tests
its associated item participates in.
Secure GT protects the items’ privacy such that an eavesdropper who may observe only a fraction of the pool-tests,
will not be able to infer the status of any of the items
(negligible mutual information between the captured pool-tests
and the status of the items). [7] addressed the Secure Nonadaptive Group Testing (SNGT) model. In order to confuse the
eavesdropper, instead of each item having a single test vector,
determining in which pool-tests it should participate, each item
has a random vector, chosen from a known set. [7] proved that
when the fraction of tests observed by the eavesdropper (Eve)
is 0 ≤ δ < 1, the number of tests required for both correct
Figure 1: Analogy between channel scheme with feedback to
Secure Adaptive Group Testing.
reconstruction at the legitimate user and negligible mutual
information at Eve’s side is 1/(1 − δ) times the number of
tests required with no secrecy constraint. Thus, the solution
in [7] relies on information theoretic security, which offers
security at the price of rate, or, in the GT case, trades security
and the number of tests.
In this paper, we consider Adaptive Group Testing (AGT),
in which the outcomes of previous tests can influence the
construction of future pools. In general, the adaptivity may
benefit from both a reduced number of tests (T ) and efficient
decoding techniques [8]. However, it has been shown that in
many interesting cases, the decrease in T is negligible. Several
studies have analyzed AGT as a channel coding problem with
feedback (e.g., [9]–[13]). Utilizing the same techniques as
Shannon’s seminal study [14] which proved that feedback
does not increase channel capacity, the authors in [9] showed
that feedback from the lab does not decrease the number
of tests required significantly. That is, if T is the minimal
number of tests required for reconstruction with negligible
error, when N → ∞ the gain due to the adaptivity is marginal.
Even with zero-error, the difference in T is only between
O(K 2 log N/ log K) and O(K log N ) [2].
Surprisingly, we show that in secure-adaptive group testing,
the adaptive feedback link may decrease the number of tests
required significantly, which in some cases coincides with the
number of pool tests required with no secrecy constraint at all.
While from an information theoretic perspective, previous results indeed show that in communication feedback can increase
secrecy capacity [15]–[17], herein, previous techniques do not
apply directly, as the test transferred are physical entities which
cannot be, e.g., one-time-padded, and, as we explain in the
sequel, the “encoder” in this case has no knowledge on which
K of the N items it needs to protect.
Main Contribution
We propose a new Secure Adaptive Group Testing (SAGT)
algorithm. This algorithm significantly reduces the number of
tests required, yet is sufficient for the legitimate user to identify
the defective items, and to keep an eavesdropper ignorant
regarding any of the items.
The model is depicted in Figure 1. In the suggested solution,
the set of indices describing the defective items takes the place
of a confidential message; the testing matrix represents the
design of the pools, where each row corresponds to a separate
item. Each such matrix row is associated with a codeword
where 1 denotes the pool tests that the corresponding item
participates. The decoding algorithm is analogous to a channel
decoding process, yet now the adaptive link from the lab (who
examines the pools) to the mixer (who mixes the samples and
creates the pooled tests) takes the place of a feedback link.
The eavesdropper observation is analogous to the output of
an erasure channel, such that only part of the tests sent from
the legitimate source (the mixer) to the legitimate receiver are
observed by the eavesdropper. We assume a private adaptive
link, which is not observable to the eavesdropper.
We use the feedback link from the lab to the mixer in order
to modify the testing matrix, according to the shared information between them, in a way which can be comprehended
by both the lab and the mixer, yet confuses the eavesdropper
regarding which item participates in each pool test. However,
unlike wiretap channels with feedback, we cannot use the
data on the link directly, and must use a coding scheme, to
increase the number of keys we can generate. Although the
keys generated are dependent, any subset which Eve eventually
observes is independent and thus protected. Accordingly, this
adaptive algorithm decreases the factor 1/(1 − δ) given in
SNGT, and one may use a smaller number of tests. In the
case that the information rate on the feedback is equal to the
rate of the eavesdropper’s observation, this factor is completely
rescinded. Thus, we achieve the same sufficiency bound on T
as given for the non-secure GT.
to denote their realizations, and calligraphic letters to denote
the alphabet. Logarithms are in base 2 and hb (·) denotes the
binary entropy function.
In general, GT is defined by a testing matrix
X = {Xj (t)}1≤j≤N,1≤t≤T ∈ {0, 1}N ×T ,
where each row corresponds to a separate item j ∈
{1, . . . , N }, and each column corresponds to a separate pool
test t ∈ {1, . . . , T }. For the j-th item, entry Xj (t) = 1 if
item j participates in the t-th pool test and Xj (t) = 0 if is
not. Denoting by Aj ∈ {0, 1} an indicator function indicating
whether the j-th item belongs to the defective set, the pool
test outcome Y (t) ∈ Y T is
Y (t) =
N
_
j=1
Xj (t)Aj =
_
Xd (t),
d∈K
W
where
is used to denote the boolean OR operation.
In AGT, we assume that the makeup of a testing pool can
depend on the outcomes of earlier tests, by adaptive feedback
link from the lab to the mixer, such that for any test t > 1
and any item j, Xj (t) = Xj (t|Y (1), . . . , Y (t − 1)). In the
secure model, we assume this link is private, and at a limited
rate Rf . That is, symbols Ft , t ∈ {1, . . . , T } are sent over an
adaptive private feedback link, secretly from the eavesdropper.
The feedback alphabets are denoted by {F1 , . . . , FT }. Their
cardinalities must satisfy
T
1X
log(|Ft |) ≤ Rf .
T t=1
At each time instant t, Ft−1 is computed by the lab and
revealed to the mixer. The symbol Ft at time instant t may
depend on Y t−1 , the t−1 prior outcomes of the pool tests, the
previous feedback symbols, F t−1 , and some randomness. That
is, we assume there exists a distribution p(Ft |Y t−1 , F t−1 ).
Hence, in the secure AGT
II. P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
Xj (t) = Xj (t|F t ).
In SAGT, a legitimate user wishes to identify a small
unknown subset K of defective items form a larger set N ,
while reducing the number of measurements ,T , as much
as possible and keeping an eavesdropper, which is able to
observe a subset of the tests results ignorant regarding the
status of the N items. The adaptive link allows the outcomes
from previous tests to influence the makeup of future tests
in order to further reduce the total number of measurements.
N = |N |, K = |K| denote the total number of items, and
the number of defective items, respectively. The status of
the items, defective or not, should be kept secure from the
eavesdropper, but detectable by the legitimate user. We assume
that in each round the number K of defective items is known
apriori. This is a common assumption in the GT literature
[18]. Figure 2 gives a graphical representation of the model.
Throughout the paper, we use boldface to denote matrices,
capital letters to denote random variables, lower case letters
Note that in the classic adaptive case, where simply the
previous outcome is revealed to the mixer, we have Ft = Yt−1 ,
hence |Ft | = 2 for all t and therefor Rf = 1.
In SAGT, we assume an eavesdropper, which observes a
noisy vector Z T = {Z(1), . . . , Z(T )}, generated from the
outcome vector Y T . We concentrate on the erasure case, where
the probability of erasure is 1 − δ, i.i.d. for each test. That is,
on average, T δ outcomes are not erased and are available to
the eavesdropper via Z T .
N
Denote by W ∈ W , {1, . . . , K
} the index of the subset
of defective items. We assume W is uniformly distributed, that
is, there is no apriori bias to any specific subset. Denote by
Ŵ (Y T , F T ) the index recovered by the legitimate decoder,
after observing Y T . We refer to the adaptive procedure of
creating the testing matrix, together with the decoder as a
SAGT algorithm. We are interested in the asymptotic behavior
of a SAGT algorithm.
Figure 2: Noiseless secure adaptive group-testing setup.
Definition 1. A sequence of SAGT algorithms with parameters N, K,T and Rf is asymptotically reliable and weakly
secure if: (1) At the legitimate receiver, observing Y T ,
lim P (Ŵ (Y T , F T ) 6= W ) = 0.
T →∞
(2) At the eavesdropper, observing Z T ,
lim
T →∞
1
I(W ; Z T ) = 0.
T
III. R ELATED W ORK
Recently works [3]–[5], [7], [9]–[13] adopted an information theoretic perspective on GT, presenting it as a channel
coding problem. We briefly review the most relevant results.
In [3], the authors mapped the NGT model to an equivalent
channel model, where the defective set takes the place of the
message, the testing matrix rows are codewords, and the test
outcomes are the received signal. They let Ŝ(X T , Y T ) denote
the estimate of the defective subset S, which is random due
to the randomness in X and Y . Furthermore, let Pe denote
the average probability of error, averaged over all subsets
S of cardinality K, variables X T and outcomes Y T , i.e.,
Pe = P r[Ŝ(X T , Y T ) 6= S]. Then, where (S 1 , S 2 ) denote
the partition of defective set S into disjoint sets S 1 and S 2
with cardinalities i, the flowing bounds on the total number
of tests required in Bernoulli NGT was given by T ≤ T ≤ T ,
where for some ε > 0 independent of N and K,
log N −K
i
T = (1 + ε) · max
,
i=1,...,K I(XS 1 ; XS 2 , Y )
log N −K+i
i
T = max
,
i=1,...,K I(XS 1 ; XS 2 , Y )
In [9], the authors considered the AGT model as channel
coding with feedback, where future inputs to the channel
can depend on past outputs. Shannon proved that feedback
does not improve the capacity of a single-user channel [14].
However, due to the non-tightness of the bounds on testing in
the non-adaptive case, the authors could not show that adaptive
GT requires the same number of tests as non-adaptive testing
exactly. Alternatively, they showed that it obeys the same lower
bound and requires no more tests than the non-adaptive case.
Moreover, in [11], using a similar analogy to channel coding
N
problem, the authors defined the AGT rate R as log2 K
/T
and introduced the capacity C, that is, if for any ε > 0, there
exists a sequence of algorithms with
N
log2 K
≤C −ε
lim
N →∞
Ta
and success probability
approaching one, yet with
N
limN →∞ log2 K
/T > C it approaches zero.
In our earlier work [7], we focused on SNGT. We considered
a scenario where there is an eavesdropper which is able to
observe a subset of the outcomes. We proposed a SNGT algorithm, which keeps the eavesdropper with leakage probability
δ, ignorant regarding the items’ status. Specifically, when the
fraction of tests observed by Eve is 0 ≤ δ < 1, [7] proved that
the number of tests required for both correct reconstruction at
the legitimate user and negligible mutual information at Eve’s
1
times the number of tests required with no secrecy
side is 1−δ
constraint. Then, where I(XS 1 ; XS 2 , Y ) ≥ i/K, according
[7, Claim 1], the flowing bounds on the total number of tests
required in Bernoulli SNGT was given by T s ≤ Ts ≤ T s ,
where for some ε > 0 independent of N and K,
K
N −K
1+ε
Ts =
max
log
,
1 − δ i=1,...,K i
i
1
N
Ts =
log
.
1−δ
K
IV. M AIN R ESULTS
Under the model definition given in Section II, our main
results are the following sufficiency (direct) and necessity
(converse) conditions, characterizing the maximal number of
tests required to guarantee both reliability and security. The
direct proof and leakage are given in Section V. The remaining
proofs are deferred to Section VI.
A. Direct (Sufficiency)
With a private rate limited feedback link, the sufficiency
part is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 1. Assume a SAGT model with N items, out of which
K = O(1) are defective. For any δ < 1 and private adaptive
rate limited feedback 0 < Rf < 1, if
K
N −K
1+ε
Tsa ≥
max
log
,
min{1, 1 − δ + Rf } i=1,...,K i
i
for some ε > 0 independent of N and K, then there exists a
sequence of SAGT algorithms which are reliable and weakly
secure. That is, as N → ∞, both the average error probability
approaches zero and an eavesdropper with leakage probability
δ is kept ignorant.
It is important to note that if Rf ≥ δ, as the direct proof will
show, the information obtained over the adaptive link between
the lab and the mixer is powerful enough to obtain security
without increasing T . Hence, in this case, the direct bounds
of the non-secure and secure adaptive group testing are equal,
that is, T = Tsa . Even when Rf < δ, the information obtained
over the feedback between the lab and the mixer reduces the
upper bound on the number of the tests required in SNGT,
thus, T < Tsa ≤ T s .
Using an upper bound, such that, log N −K
≤
i
i log (N −K)e
,
the
maximization
in
Theorem
1
can
be
solved
i
easily, leading to a simple bound on T .
Corollary 1. For SAGT with parameters K << N and T ,
reliability and secrecy can be maintained with
Tsa ≥
1+ε
K log(N − K)e.
min{1, 1 − δ + Rf }
Remark 1. In this paper, we consider the asymptotic case
in T and negligible error. In this case, without a secrecy
constrain, it is well known that feedback does not help [9].
Nonetheless, with a secrecy constraint we show that the link
is used only for shared randomness. However, for finite T and
zero error [2], the mixer may use the previous outcomes to
reduce the number of tests T . Thus, for finite T , zero error
and a secrecy constraint, is not trivial what should be shared
over the link, either pure randomness in order to cope with
the secrecy constraint or single previous outcomes in order to
try adaptively reduce the number of tests.
B. Converse (Necessity)
The necessity part is given by the following theorem.
Theorem 2. Let T be the minimum number of tests necessary
to identify the defective set Sw of cardinality K among
population of size N in a SAGT model with private adaptive
rate limited feedback 0 ≤ Rf ≤ 1 while keeping eavesdropper,
with pooling outcome test leakage probability δ < 1, ignorant
regarding the status of the items. Then,
1
N
a
log
.
Ts ≥
K
min{1, 1 − δ + Rf }
The proof is deferred to Section VI. Note that, compared
to the lower bound without a security constraints, there is an
increase by a multiplicative factor of 1/ min{1, 1 − δ + Rf }.
When Rf ≥ δ, the lower bounds of the non-secure and secure
adaptive group testing are equal, i.e., T = Tsa .
C. Secrecy capacity in SAGT
Returning to the analogy in [11] between channel capacity
and group testing, one might define by
Cs the (asymptotic)
N
minimal threshold value for log K
/T , above which no
reliable and secure scheme is possible. Under this definition,
where C is the capacity without the security constraint, the
result in this paper show that Cs ≥ (min{1, 1 − δ + Rf })C .
Clearly, this can be written as,
Cs
≥ min{C, C − C(δ) + C(Rf )},
raising the usual interpretation as the difference between the
capacity to the legitimate decoder and that to the eavesdropper,
yet, with the capacity of the information obtained over the
feedback link between the legitimate decoder and encoder
[15]–[17]. Note that as the effective number of tests Eve sees
is Te = δT , hence her GT capacity is (δ)C.
V. C ODE C ONSTRUCTION WITH A DAPTIVE P RIVATE
F EEDBACK AND A P ROOF FOR T HEOREM 1
The goal, in general, is to design a proper testing matrix, or,
specifically, an algorithm to adaptively update it. Remember
that each row describes the tests an item participates in.
We thus construct this matrix in batches (of T tests each),
each time selecting an appropriate row for each item. In a
batch, for each item we generate a bin, containing several
sub-bins, with several rows in each sub-bin (see Figure 3).
Internal randomness in the mixer, which is not shared with
any other party, is used to select a sub-bin for each item,
while data received from the adaptive link is used to select
the right row from the sub-bin. While this solution is inspired
by codes for wiretap channels with rate limited feedback [16],
there are several key differences, which not only change the
construction, but also require non-trivial processing of the data
received from the feedback. Specifically, first, unlike a wiretap
channel, herein there are N items, only K of them, unknown
to the mixer, actually participate in the output (“transmit”).
Thus, bins and sub-bins sizes should be properly normalized.
More importantly, the mixer, which acts as an encoder, does
not know which K messages it should protect. Thus, the mixer
should artificially blow-up the data it receives from the private
feedback: from bits (used as keys) intended to protect the K
defective items, it generates a larger number of keys, sufficient
N items, satisfying the property that any K out of the N
which will eventually participate, will still be protected. In
other words, the keys received from the feedback cannot be
used as is, and an interesting secret sharing-type scheme must
be used.
Formally, a (batch-processing)
SAGT code consists of an
N
index set W = {1, 2, . . . K
}, its w-th item corresponding
to the w-th subset K ⊂ {1, . . . , N }; A discrete memoryless
source of randomness at the mixer (RX , pRX ); A discrete
memoryless source of randomness at the lab (RY , pRY );
A feedback at rate Rf bits per test, resulting in an index
I ∈ {1, . . . , 2T Rf } after T uses; We use a single index due
to the batch processing (Section V-A describes a test-by-test
adaptive algorithm based on the one herein); The mixer, of
course, does not know which items are defective, thus it needs
to select a row for each item. However, since only the rows
of the defective items affect the output Y T , it is beneficial to
define an “encoder"
GX : W × RX × I → XSw ∈ {0, 1}K×T ,
Figure 3: Encoding process for a SAGT code.
that is, mapping the message, the randomness and input from
the adaptive link to the K codewords which are summed
to give the tests output Y T . Note that a stochastic encoder
and the causally known feedback message I are similar to
encoders ensuring information theoretic security, as randomness is required to confuse the eavesdropper about the actual
information [16], [19].
A decoder at the legitimate user is a map
Ŵ : Y T × I → W.
The probability of error is P (Ŵ 6= W ). The probability that
an outcome test leaks to the eavesdropper is δ. We assume
a memoryless model, i.e., each outcome Y (t) depends only
on the corresponding input XSw (t), and the eavesdropper
observes Z(t), generated from Y (t) according to
p(Y T , Z T |XSw ) =
T
Y
p(Y (t)|XSw (t))p(Z(t)|Y (t)).
t=1
Next we provide the detailed construction and analysis.
1) Codebook Generation: Choose integers F and M such
that
log2 (F ) = T (Rf /K) and log2 (M ) = T (δ − Rf − )/K.
For each item we generate bin of M · F independent and
identically distributed codewords. Each codeword of size T is
generated randomly, where each Xj (t) is chosen according to
P (x) ∼ Bernoulli(ln(2)/K). Consequently,
T
P (X ) =
T
Y
P (xi ).
i=1
Then we split each bin to sub-bins of codewords xT (m, f ),
1 ≤ m ≤ M and 1 ≤ f ≤ F (illustrated in Figure 3).
2) Key Generation: We now describe the generation of
the shared keys created from the information sent over the
adaptive link. This link is of rate Rf . We do not use it to
send information about test results, and simply send random
bits. Therefore, in a block of length T we receive S = T Rf
secret bits. We divide the secret bits to K secret keys, each
constituting T Rf /K = SK bits.
Our goal is to take these K keys, and use them to create N
new keys, with the property that if the original K keys had
a random uniform i.i.d. distribution, then any set of K keys
out the N new ones will have the same random uniform i.i.d.
distribution. This can be done using a generator matrix of an
[N, K] MDS code. Such a generator matrix has the property
that any K columns are linearly independent. Thus, taking the
K original keys, as an SK × K matrix, and multiplying it by
the generator matrix GK×N creates a matrix of size SK × N ,
where each column is used as the new key. Since any subset of
K columns of G is invertible, each set of K new keys is simply
a 1 : 1 transformation of the K original keys. The importance
of this scheme in our context is as follows: for any subset
of K new keys (out of N ), if an eavesdropper has no access
to the original K keys, he/she is ignorant regarding the new
keys. Moreover, it is important to note that unlike protection
using a one-time-pad, these keys cannot be XORed with the
rows of the testing matrix, as this operation will change the
probability of each item participating in a pool-test, deviating
from the optimal distribution of the testing matrix.
3) Testing: The mixer receives the T Rf feedback secret
bits, divides them to K keys and uses the MDS code to create
N new keys. Each new key is of length T Rf /K. Therefore,
at each round and for each item j, the mixer selects a subbin using its internal randomness, and a message within it
using the key. The result is a codeword xT (m, f ). Therefore,
the SAGT matrix contains N randomly selected codewords of
length T , one for each item (defective or not).
In the first round of tests, the mixer has no available
(feedback) key, hence it operates using a larger number of
tests for that round as given for the non-adaptive SGT in [7].
Amortized over multiple rounds, this loss is negligible.
4) Decoding at the Legitimate Receiver: The decoder looks
for a collection of K codewords XSTŵ , one from each sub-bin,
for which Y T is most likely. Namely,
P (Y T |XSTŵ ) > P (Y T |XSTw ), ∀w 6= ŵ.
Then, the legitimate user declares Ŵ (Y T × F ) as the set of
bins in which the rows reside.
5) Reliability: Let I(XS 1 ; XS 2 , Y ) denote the mutual information between XS 1 and (XS 2 , Y ), under the i.i.d. distribution with which the codebook was generated and remembering
that Y is the output of a Boolean channel. The following
lemma is a key step in proving the reliability of the decoding
algorithm suggested herein. This Lemma is a direct consequence of [7, Lemma 1], under the enhancement that the index
of each sub-bin is set according to the known key sheared
between the legitimate decoder and the mixer at each round
of the algorithm.
Lemma 1. If the number of tests satisfies
i
log N −K
M
i
,
T ≥ (1 + ε) · max
i=1,...,K I(XS 1 ; XS 2 , Y )
then, under the codebook above, as N → ∞ the average error
probability approaches zero.
Applying [7, Claim 1], which lower bounds the mutual information between XS 1 to (XS 2 , Y ) by i/K, to the expression
δ−Rf −
in Lemma 1, and substituting M = 2T K , a sufficient
condition for reliability is
1+ε
N −K
i
T ≥ max
log
+ T (δ − Rf )
i
1≤i≤K
K
i
K
with some small . Rearranging terms results in
1+ε
N −K
T ≥ max
log
.
1≤i≤K min{1, 1 − (1 + ε)(δ − Rf )}i/K
i
This complete the reliability part. Note that the bound holds
for large K and N , and ε independent of K and N .
6) Information Leakage at the Eavesdropper: We now
prove the security constraint is met. Hence, we wish to show
that I(W ; Z T )/T → 0, as T → ∞. Denote by CT the random
codebook and by XST the set of codewords corresponding to
the true defective items. We have,
1
T
I(W ; Z T |CT )
=
1
T
F
F
I(W, RK RK
; Z T |CT ) + I(RK RK
; Z T |W CT ) ,
(1)
where RK is the random variable used by the encoder to
choose the sub-bins. That is, the encoder has a random variable
for each item, RK denotes the union of K such variables, for
F
is again a union, this time of K
the K defective items. RK
keys. These are K “shares", out of the N shares generated
F
uniquely define XST ,
by the MDS code. Since W, RK , RK
continuing from (1), we have:
F
= T1 I(XST ; Z T |CT ) − I(RK RK
; Z T |W, CT )
F
= T1 (I(XST ; Z T |CT ) − H(RK RK
|W, CT )
F
+H(RK RK
|Z T , W, CT ))
(a) 1
=T
(b)
F
F
|Z T , W, CT )
) + H(RK RK
(XST ; Z T |CT ) − H(RK RK
δ−R −
R
≤δ − T1 K T Kf + T Kf + T1 H(RK |Z T , W, CT )
(c)
≤T ,
F
where T → 0 as T → ∞. (a) is since both RK and RK
are
independent of W and the codebook. (b) is since both keys are
Rf
uniform, the first includes K variables of T ( δ−
K − K ) bits
R
each, and the second K shares of T Kf bits each. (c) follows
from [7, Section V.B]. In short, given the true K defectives,
the codebook and her output Z T , Eve sees a simple MAC
channel, at a rate slightly below her capacity. Therefore, she
can identify which codeword was selected for each item, hence
F
identify both RK and RK
.
A. Test design depends on the outcome of previous pool-test
In this solution, the outcome of each separate pool-test,
according to the rate of the private adaptive link, can be
available at the mixer to influence on the next test. It is
important to note that unlike the first solution, we assume that
by the adaptive link, the lab and the mixer can agree\know
which pool-test, t ∈ T , depends on the symbols sent over
the link. This assumption is not trivial, however, in various
Figure 4: Encoding process for a SAGT code where the test
design depends on the outcome of previous pool-test.
scenarios based on GT [2] this assumption holds, e.g., in the
channel problem, when the encoder (mixer) and the decoder
(lab) schedule the transmission over the main channel and the
feedback.
In the code construction phase, we generate code as in
Section V, yet, with one codeword in each sub-bin (i.e., the
feedback will not used to select the rows in the original testing
matrix). Hence for each item we have a row-bin with M rowcodewords. Moreover, for each possible column in the original
testing matrix, we generate a column-bin with two columncodewords. Then for each j-th item, the mixer randomly
select one row for the original testing matrix randomly as in
the first setup from the j-th row-bin, yet, per pool test, one
column-codeword is selected from his column-bin to define
which items will participate in this pool test. This column
selected according to the previous outcome feedback sent after
each separate pool-test by the legitimate user to the mixer. If
the feedback of the previous outcome is not available to the
mixer, since the rate of the feedback is limited, the mixer use
the column of the original testing matrix. Figure 4 gives a
graphical representation of the code.
Specifically, in the Q
codebook generation phase, using a
T
distribution P (X T ) = i=1 P (xi ), for each item we generate
a row-bin with M independent and identically distributed
row-codewords.
QN Then in the same way, using a distribution
P (X̃ N ) = i=1 P (x̃i ), for each possible column xN (t) we
generate a column-bin with two independent and identically
distributed column-codewords.
In the testing phase, for each item j, the mixer selects
uniformly at random one row-codeword xTj (m) from his rowbin. The lab select randomly one index in I ∈ {1, . . . , 2T Rf }
and before which pool-test t ∈ T , one bit of the index will sent
to the mixer over the feedback to influence on the next test.
Note that the lab is available to send at most T Rf bits. Then, in
each pool-test t, using the previous feedback outcome Ft , the
N
mixer selects one column-codeword x̃N
t (Ft ) from the x (t)
column bin. In the case that the previous feedback outcome is
not available at the mixer, the mixer use the original column.
The decoder at the legitimate user (lab) know exactly which
pool test was depended on the bits sent over the feedback and
what was the indexes of the columns selected from the columnbins by the mixer for each pool-tests. Hence, the decoder
procedure after T pool-tests, and the analysis of the reliability
and the information leakage at the eavesdropper are almost a
direct consequence of Section V.
Thus,
H(W ) ≤
VI. C ONVERSE (N ECESSITY )
In this section, we derive the necessity bound on the required number of tests, in the setup with rate limited feedback
between the legitimate user to the lab. Similar to [16], using
Fano’s inequality, for Ŵ = ŵ(Y T , F T ),
N
H(W |Ŵ ) ≤ 1 + Pe log
= T ,
K
where T → 0 as T → ∞ if Pe → 0. Since Ŵ is a function
of Y T , F T ,
H(W |Y T , F T ) ≤ H(W |Ŵ ) ≤ T T .
I(W ; Z T ) = T γT ,
1
T
PT
i=1
log(|Fi |) ≤ Rf and
To conclude, the well-known technique of introducing a time
sharing random variable is used. Assume Q is independent of
XTS w , Y T , Z T and uniform on {1, . . . , T }, this results in
Rf +
= Rf +
T
1X
(I(XSiw ; Yi |Zi ) + δT
T i=1
T
1X
(I(XSiw ; Yi |Zi , Q = i) + δT
T i=1
= Rf + I(XSQw ; YQ |ZQ , Q) + δT
H(W |Z T ) + I(W ; Z T )
= Rf + I(XSw ; Y |Z, Q) + δT
T
=
H(W |Z ) + T γT
I(W ; Y T , F T |Z T ) + H(W |Y T , Z T , F T ) + T γT
≤
I(W ; Y T , F T |Z T ) + T T + T γT
(c)
I(W ; F T |Z T ) + I(W ; Y T |F T , Z T ) + T δT
(d)
≤
H(Fi ) + T δT .
i=1
(2)
=
=
T
X
T
1
1X
H(W ) ≤
I(XSiw ; Yi |Zi ) + Rf + δT .
T
T i=1
H(W )
(b)
; Yi |Zi ) +
We now use the constraint
normalize by T . We have,
where γT → 0 as T → ∞. Consequently,
(a)
I(X
Siw
i=1
1
H(W ) ≤
T
Using the secrecy constraint,
=
T
X
T
T
H(F |Z ) +
I(W, XTS w ; Y T |F T , Z T )
where XSw := XSQw , Y := YQ , Z := ZQ ,. Letting T → ∞,
δT → 0 and T → 0, hence
1
H(W ) ≤
T
≤
=
+ T δT
Rf + I(XSw ; Y |Z, Q)
Rf + I(XSw , Q; Y |Z)
Rf + I(XSw ; Y |Z).
where (a) follows from (2), (b) follows from Fano’s inequality
and (c) follows by defining δT = T + γT . The following
recursive lemma is now required.
Hence,
Lemma 2 ( [16]). For each t ∈ {1, . . . T },
From the above bound, and since the eavesdropper can obtain
information only from the outcomes of the legitimate user,
such that, p(y, z|x) = p(y|x)p(z|y),
H(F t |Z t ) + I(W, XtS w ; Y t |F t , Z t )
t−1
≤ H(F t−1 |Z t−1 ) + I(W, Xt−1
|F t−1 , Z t−1 )
Sw ; Y
t−1
+ H(Ft |W, Xt−1
, Z t−1 ) + I(XStw ; Yt |Zt ).
Sw , F
To continue, we use Lemma 2 recursively starting from (d):
H(W )
≤ H(F T |Z T ) + I(W, XTS w ; Y T |F T , Z T ) + T δT
≤ H(F T −1 |Z T −1 )
+I(W, XTS w−1 ; Y T −1 |F T −1 , Z T −1 )
1
H(W ) ≤ min{I(XSw ; Y ), I(XSw ; Y |Z) + Rf }.
T
1
H(W ) ≤ min{I(XSw ; Y ), I(XSw ; Y ) − I(XSw ; Z) + Rf }.
T
N
Since H(W ) = log K
, we have
1
N
log
≤ min{I(XSw ; Y ), I(XSw ; Y )−I(XSw ; Z)+Rf }.
T
K
Now let Z̄ denote the random variable corresponding to the
tests which are not available to the eavesdropper. Hence,
+I(XSTw ; YT |ZT ) + H(FT ) + T δT
H(Z̄) = I(XSw ; Y ) − I(XSw ; Z).
≤ H(F T −2 |Z T −2 )
+I(W, XTS w−2 ; Y T −2 |F T −2 , Z T −2 )
+I(XSTw−1 ; YT −1 |ZT −1 ) + H(FT −1 )
+I(XSTw ; YT |ZT ) + H(FT ) + T δT
≤ ...
T
T
X
X
≤
I(XSiw ; Yi |Zi ) +
H(Fi ) + δT .
i=1
i=1
Denote by Ē the set of tests which are not available to Eve
and by Ēγ the event {|Ē| ≤ T (1 − δ)(1 + γ)} for some γ > 0.
We have
H(Z̄)
= P (Ēγ )H(Z̄|Ēγ ) + P (Ēγc )H(Z̄|Ēγc )
≤ T (1 − δ)(1 + γ) + T P (Ēγc )
≤ T (1 − δ)(1 + γ) + T 2−T (1−δ)f (γ) ,
where the last inequality follows from the Chernoff bound for
i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with parameter (1 − δ) and
is true for some f (γ) such that f (γ) > 0 for any γ > 0.
Thus, we have
N
log
≤ T (1 − δ)(1 + γ) + T 2−T (1−δ)f (γ) + Rf .
K
That is,
Tsa
N
1
log
.
≥
min{1, 1 − δ + Rf }
K
This completes the converse proof.
R EFERENCES
[1] R. Dorfman, “The detection of defective members of large populations,”
The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 436–440, 1943.
[2] D.-Z. Du and F. K. Hwang, “Combinatorial group testing and its
applications (applied mathematics),” 2000.
[3] G. K. Atia and V. Saligrama, “Boolean compressed sensing and noisy
group testing,” Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 58, no. 3,
pp. 1880–1901, 2012. A minor corection appered in vol. 61, no. 3, pp.
1507–1507, 2015.
[4] M. B. Malyutov, “Search for sparse active inputs: A review.” in Information Theory, Combinatorics, and Search Theory, 2013, pp. 609–647.
[5] H. Aydinian, F. Cicalese, and C. Deppe, Information Theory, Combinatorics, and Search Theory: In Memory of Rudolf Ahlswede. Springer,
2013, vol. 7777.
[6] G. K. Atia, V. Saligrama, and C. Aksoylar, “Correction to “boolean
compressed sensing and noisy group testing”[mar 12 1880-1901],”
Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1507–
1507, 2015.
[7] A. Cohen, A. Cohen, S. Jaggi, and O. Gurewitz, “Secure group testing,”
arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.04849, 2016.
[8] J. M. Hughes-Oliver and W. H. Swallow, “A two-stage adaptive grouptesting procedure for estimating small proportions,” Journal of the
American Statistical Association, vol. 89, no. 427, pp. 982–993, 1994.
[9] M. Aldridge, “Adaptive group testing as channel coding with feedback,”
in Information Theory Proceedings (ISIT), 2012 IEEE International
Symposium on. IEEE, 2012, pp. 1832–1836.
[10] C. Aksoylar and V. Saligrama, “Information-theoretic bounds for adaptive sparse recovery,” in Information Theory (ISIT), 2014 IEEE International Symposium on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 1311–1315.
[11] L. Baldassini, O. Johnson, and M. Aldridge, “The capacity of adaptive
group testing,” in Information Theory Proceedings (ISIT), 2013 IEEE
International Symposium on. IEEE, 2013, pp. 2676–2680.
[12] T. Kealy, O. Johnson, and R. Piechocki, “The capacity of non-identical
adaptive group testing,” in Communication, Control, and Computing
(Allerton), 2014 52nd Annual Allerton Conference on. IEEE, 2014,
pp. 101–108.
[13] S. Aeron, V. Saligrama, and M. Zhao, “Information theoretic bounds
for compressed sensing,” Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on,
vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 5111–5130, 2010.
[14] C. E. Shannon, “The zero error capacity of a noisy channel,” Information
Theory, IRE Transactions on, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 8–19, 1956.
[15] R. Ahlswede and N. Cai, “Transmission, identification and common randomness capacities for wire-tap channels with secure feedback from the
decoder,” in General Theory of Information Transfer and Combinatorics.
Springer, 2006, pp. 258–275.
[16] E. Ardestanizadeh, M. Franceschetti, T. Javidi, and Y.-H. Kim, “Wiretap
channel with secure rate-limited feedback,” Information Theory, IEEE
Transactions on, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 5353–5361, 2009.
[17] A. Cohen and A. Cohen, “Wiretap channel with causal state information
and secure rate-limited feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 1192–1203, 2016.
[18] A. J. Macula, “Probabilistic nonadaptive group testing in the presence
of errors and DNA library screening,” Annals of Combinatorics, vol. 3,
no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1999.
[19] M. Bloch and J. Barros, Physical-Layer Security: From Information
Theory to Security Engineering. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
| 7cs.IT
|
Arrhythmia Classification from the Abductive Interpretation of Short
Single-Lead ECG Records
Tomás Teijeiro*, Constantino A. García, Daniel Castro and Paulo Félix
arXiv:1711.03892v1 [cs.AI] 10 Nov 2017
Centro Singular de Investigación en Tecnoloxías da Información (CITIUS), University of Santiago de
Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Abstract
In this work we propose a new method for the rhythm
classification of short single-lead ECG records, using a set
of high-level and clinically meaningful features provided
by the abductive interpretation of the records. These features include morphological and rhythm-related features
that are used to build two classifiers: one that evaluates the
record globally, using aggregated values for each feature;
and another one that evaluates the record as a sequence,
using a Recurrent Neural Network fed with the individual
features for each detected heartbeat. The two classifiers
are finally combined using the stacking technique, providing an answer by means of four target classes: Normal sinus rhythm (N), Atrial fibrillation (A), Other anomaly (O)
and Noisy (~). The approach has been validated against
the 2017 Physionet/CinC Challenge dataset, obtaining a
final score of 0.83 and ranking first in the competition.
1.
Introduction
The potential of Artificial Intelligence and machine
learning techniques to improve the early detection of cardiac diseases using low-cost ECG tests is still largely untapped. The 2017 Physionet/Computing in Cardiology
challenge defies the scientific community to propose solutions to the automatic detection of Atrial Fibrillation from
short single lead ECG signals [1]. The challenge is posed
as a classical machine learning problem: A labeled training set is provided, and the proposals are evaluated against
a hidden test set of records. However, even if the only
metric for the final ranking is the accuracy of the proposed
models, a number of additional properties should be considered for the final adoption of each proposal in the clinical practice. Here, we emphasize on the interpretability
of the automatic detection of Atrial Fibrillation, a major
concern to ensure trust by the care staff [2].
In this sense, our proposal is based on a high-level description of the target signal by means of the same features
used by cardiologists in ECG analysis. This description
is generated with a pure knowledge-based approach, using
an abductive framework for time series interpretation [3]
that looks for the set of explanatory hypotheses that best
account for the observed evidence. Only after this description has been built, machine learning methods were used
to make up for the lack of the expert criteria applied in the
labeling of the training set, and to alleviate the effect of
possible errors in the interpretation process.
2.
Methods
The global architecture of the proposal is depicted in
Figure 1, and the processing stages are explained in the
following subsections.
2.1.
Preprocessing
The preprocessing stage aims at improving the quality
of the data to be interpreted in the following stages, and
involves two different tasks:
2.1.1. Data relabeling: The labeling of the training set
was performed by a single expert in a single pass, and as a
consequence some inconsistencies appear in the classification criteria. Thus, a thorough manual relabeling was carried out, but trying to be conservative and guided by preliminary classification results. We focused on records classified as N but showing what we consider clear anomalies.
A total number of 197 out of 8528 records were relabeled.
2.1.2. Lead inversion detection: A number of records in
the training set were found to be inverted, probably due to
electrode misplacement. Inverted records are more likely
to be classified as abnormal due to the presence of infrequent QRS and T wave morphologies, as well as to the
greater difficulty to identify P waves. The inverted records
were first identified manually, and then a simple logistic
regression classifier was trained considering 14 features
obtained from the raw signal and a tentative delineation
of the P wave, QRS complex and T wave of every heartbeat detected by the gqrs application from the Physionet
library [4]. This delineation was performed using the Construe algorithm [3], limiting the interpretation to the conduction level, that is, avoiding the rhythm interpretation.
ECG Signal
Lead Inversion
Detection
Global Features
Global
Classification
Per-Beat Features
Sequence
Classification
Abductive
Interpretation
Classification
Stacking
Final Class
Figure 1. Classification algorithm steps.
2.2.
Abductive interpretation
The abductive interpretation of the ECG signal is the
most significant stage in the proposed approach. Its objective is to characterize the physiological processes underlying the signal behavior, building a description of the
observed phenomena in multiple abstraction levels. This
responsibility lies with the Construe algorithm, which applies a non-monotonic reasoning scheme to find the set
of hypotheses that best explain the observed evidence, by
means of a domain-specific knowledge base composed of
a set of observables and a set of abstraction grammars.
The knowledge base is the same used in [3], that allows to
explain the ECG at the conduction and rhythm abstraction
levels, thus providing the same features used by cardiologists in ECG analysis. The initial evidence is the set of
waves identified in the wave delineation step, that are abstracted by a set of rhythm patterns to describe the full signal as a sequence of cardiac rhythms, including normal sinus rhythms, bradycardias, tachycardias, atrial fibrillation
episodes, etc. The non-monotonic nature of the interpretation process allows us to modify the initial set of evidence,
by discarding heartbeats that cannot be abstracted by any
rhythm pattern, or by looking for missed beats that are predicted by the pattern selected as the best explanatory hypothesis for a signal fragment. This ability to correct the
initial evidence is the main strength of our proposal, since
it discards many false anomalies generated by the presence
of noise and artifacts in the signal. Figure 2 shows an example of a noisy signal in which the gqrs application detects many false positive beats, that are removed or modified in the final interpretation that concludes with a single
normal rhythm hypothesis that explains the full fragment.
As we can also see in the Figure, the result of the interpretation stage is a sequence of P waves, QRS complexes
and T waves observations, as well as a sequence of cardiac
rhythms abstracting all those waves.
2.3.
Global feature extraction
Considering that each ECG record has to be classified
globally, providing a single label for the entire signal duration, after the interpretation stage a set of features are
calculated trying to summarize the information provided
by Construe. A total number of 79 features are calculated,
that are comprehensively described in the published software documentation. The feature set is divided into three
main groups:
• Rhythm features: This includes statistical measures on
the RR sequence, such as the limits, median or median absolute deviation; heart rate variability features such as the
PNN5, PNN10, PNN50 and PNN100 measures [5]; and
information about the rhythm interpretation, such as the
median duration of each rhythm hypothesis.
• Morphological features:
This includes information
about the duration, amplitude and frequency spectrum of
the observations in the conduction abstraction level, including P and T waves, QRS complexes, PR and QT intervals, and the TP segments.
• Signal quality features: Their purpose is to assess the
importance of the morphological features showing conduction anomalies, such as wide QRS complexes or long PR
intervals. They are based on the sum of the absolute differences of the signal, which we refer to as profile. Some
of the profiled areas of the signal are the baseline segments
and the P wave area before each heartbeat (taking a constant window of 250 ms).
2.4.
Global classification
If a precise definition of the expert knowledge leading
to the labeling of the training set were available, then the
final classification could be directly developed with a basic
rule-based system operating on the features extracted from
the abductive interpretation stage, and the accuracy of the
system would depend mainly on the accuracy of the interpretations. However, the challenge does not publish any
guidelines for the classification, specially for the O class.
Therefore, an automatic classifier was trained with two objectives: 1) To reveal the criteria leading to the training set
labeling; and 2) to make the classification more accurate
by learning possible mistakes of the abductive interpretation.
The classification method selected for this stage was
the Tree Gradient Boosting algorithm, and particularly the
XGBoost implementation [6], which showed a high performance and a certain level of interpretability through the
importance given to the classification features. The optimization of the hyperparameters was performed using exhaustive grid search and 8-fold cross-validation, leading to
the following values: Maximum tree depth: 6, Learning
rate: 0.2, Gamma: 1.0, Column subsample by tree: 0.9,
Min. child weight: 20, Subsample: 0.8, and Number of
boosting rounds: 60.
Figure 2. How the abductive interpretation can fix errors in the initial evidence. [Source: First 10 seconds of the A02080 record.
Grey: Original gqrs annotations. Blue: QRS observations. Yellow: T wave observations. Green: P wave observation and Normal rhythm hypothesis.]
With respect to the first objective, we were able to formalize a number of specific anomalies that lead to classify
a record as O. This identification helped to optimize the
training set by defining more specific features to be calculated from the interpretation results. Some of the identified
anomalies sharing this class were:
• Tachycardia (Mean heart rate over 100 bpm).
• Bradycardia (Mean heart rate under 50 bpm).
• Wide QRS complex (Longer than 110 milliseconds).
• Presence of ventricular or fusion beats.
• Presence of at least one extrasystole.
• Long PR interval (Longer than 210 milliseconds).
• Ventricular tachycardia.
• Atrial flutter.
For some of these anomalies the classification in the
training set seems a bit inconsistent, since examples can
be found in several classes. For example, there are various records labeled as normal with PR interval longer than
210 milliseconds, as long as examples of records labeled
as atrial fibrillation showing an atrial flutter pattern.
Regarding the second objective, even after discovering
some of the expert criteria distinguishing the target classes
a rule-based system was not still competitive against automatic learned models. From our point of view this shows
that the XGBoost classifier is able to improve the results
of the interpretation alone.
2.5.
Per-beat feature extraction
Some of the conditions leading to a certain classification may not be present for the entire duration of a record,
so the global features are not the best option to characterize episodic events of abnormalities. For example, a
normal record with a single ectopic ventricular beat that
does not break the rhythm is quite difficult to classify as
abnormal by the global classifier. For this reason, some
of the features calculated from the abductive interpretation
are disaggregated to the individual heartbeat scope, such as
the morphology, duration and amplitude of the P wave, the
QRS complex and the T wave. Also the RR interval and
the RR variation before and after each beat is included, as
long as the profile of the P wave area. A sequence classification approach is then used to learn characteristic temporal patterns of each target class.
2.6.
Sequence classification
In the proposed approach, sequence classification relies
on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), a family of neural
networks specialized for recognizing sequences of values.
Among the different RNN implementations, we focused
on Long Short Term Memory networks (LSTMs) [7], since
they are capable of remembering information for long periods of time through the use of a cell state. Furthermore,
they are able to avoid vanishing and exploding gradients
when doing backpropagation through time. The architecture of the neural net is shown in Figure 3. The timedistributed Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) preprocesses the
features described in Section 2.5 to transform the data into
a space with easier temporal dynamics. The number of
hidden units of the MLP was 256, and the dimension of
the output space 128. A Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU)
was used as activation function. The LSTM_0 layer preprocesses the resulting sequence of transformed features
and returns a new sequence, which is subsequently used
by the other LSTMs. The LSTM_2 layer just returns the
final state of the network, whereas LSTM_1 and LSTM_3
return new transformed sequences. The pooling layers after LSTM_1 and LSTM_3 remove the temporal dimension
by computing the temporal mean and maximum of each
feature of the sequences, respectively. All the LSTMs used
128 units. Another MLP (with the same configuration of
the time-distributed one) joins and transforms the outputs
of each LSTM before a Softmax layer, which outputs a
probability for each of the 4 classes. L2 -regularization was
applied to all layers, using 10−4 as regularization strength.
Finally, dropout was also used to improve generalization
by preventing feature co-adaptation [8].
The neural network was trained using the categorical
cross-entropy as loss function, a batch size of 32, and
Adam [9] as optimizer. Furthermore, 15% of all the data
was used as validation set to monitor the performance of
the neural network. This permitted us to decrease the
learning rate when the validation loss got stuck in a plateau
and to avoid overfitting by using early stopping. The initial
√ learning rate was set to 0.002 and it was decreased by
2 when the validation loss did not improve for at least 3
epochs. Training was ended after 15 epochs without improvement.
Temporal
mean pooling
LSTM_1
Padded sequence
of
beat features
Time-distributed
MLP
LSTM_2
LSTM_0
MLP
Temporal
max pooling
LSTM_3
Softmax
Sequence
Class
Figure 3. The neural network architecture.
2.7.
Classification stacking
of interpretability by the use of high-level and meaningful
features.
The XGBoost classifier based on global features and the
RNN classifier based on the per-beat features were combined using the stacking technique. Stacking (also referred
to as stacked generalization) involves training a new classification algorithm to combine the predictions of several
classifiers [10]. Usually, the stacked model achieves better
performance than the individual models due to its ability
to discern when each base model performs best and when
it performs poorly. Prior to the application of stacking, the
predictions of 3 RNNs were averaged to decrease the variance of the RNN classifier arising from the random initialization of the RNN weights and the random split between test and validation set. Averaging similar models
also helps in reducing overfitting. Note that this averaging can be seen as a simple bagging method. The probabilities predicted by the XGBoost and the averaged RNNs
are then combined through a Linear Discriminant Analysis
(LDA) classifier, which acts as stacker. To avoid possible
collinearity issues, only 3 probabilities from each model
are used.
3.
Evaluation
To evaluate the performance of the algorithm, we followed the challenge guidelines and metrics. The final score
is assigned as the mean F1 measure of the N, A, and O
classes. Table 1 shows an example of the results that the
proposed method is able to achieve using 8-fold crossvalidation. Note that the stacker usually achieves better
scores than the base models and, furthermore, it has lower
variance (not shown in the Table).
Table 1. Example of stratified 8-fold cross-validation.
Method
0
1
2
Fold Number
3
4
5
6
7
XGBoost
0.84 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.82 0.80 0.82 0.82
RNN
0.82 0.81 0.84 0.83 0.86 0.83 0.83 0.83
LDA-stacker 0.85 0.84 0.86 0.86 0.85 0.83 0.84 0.85
4.
Mean
0.83
0.83
0.85
Conclusions
This work proves that the combination of knowledgebased and learning-based approaches is effective to build
classification systems that exploit sophisticated machine
learning methods while maintaining a remarkable degree
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of
Economy and Competitiveness under project TIN201455183-R. Constantino A. García is also supported by the
FPU Grant program from the Spanish Ministry of Education (MEC) (Ref. FPU14/02489).
References
[1]
Clifford G, Liu C, Moody B, Lehman L, Silva I, Li Q, Johnson A, Mark R. AF classification from a short single lead
ECG recording: The Physionet Computing in Cardiology
Challenge 2017. In Computing in Cardiology. 2017; .
[2] Caruana R, Lou Y, Gehrke J, Koch P, Sturm M, Elhadad
N. Intelligible Models for HealthCare. In 21th ACM
SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM Press, 2015; .
[3] Teijeiro T, Félix P, Presedo J, Castro D. Heartbeat classification using abstract features from the abductive interpretation of the ECG. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health
Informatics 2016;.
[4] Goldberger A, et al. PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit and PhysioNet: Components of a New Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals. Circulation 2000;101:215–220.
[5] Mietus JE, Peng CK, Henry I, Goldsmith RL, Goldberger
AL. The pNNx files: re-examining a widely used heart rate
variability measure. Heart British Cardiac Society oct 2002;
88(4):378–80. ISSN 1468-201X.
[6] Chen T, Guestrin C. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting
System. In 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference
on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. mar 2016; .
[7] Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory.
Neural computation 1997;9(8):1735–1780.
[8] Srivastava N, Hinton GE, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I,
Salakhutdinov R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of machine learning
research 2014;15(1):1929–1958.
[9] Kingma D, Ba J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv14126980 2014;.
[10] Wolpert DH. Stacked generalization. Neural networks
1992;5(2):241–259.
Address for correspondence:
Tomás Teijeiro Campo
Rúa de Jenaro de la Fuente Domínguez, S/N, CITIUS Building
15782 Santiago de Compostela, SPAIN
[email protected]
| 2cs.AI
|
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators,
scrambled
arXiv:1402.6246v5 [cs.DS] 13 Oct 2016
Sebastiano Vigna, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
Marsaglia proposed xorshift generators as a class of very fast, good-quality pseudorandom number generators. Subsequent analysis by Panneton and L’Ecuyer has lowered the expectations raised by Marsaglia’s
paper, showing several weaknesses of such generators. Nonetheless, many of the weaknesses of xorshift
generators fade away if their result is scrambled by a non-linear operation (as originally suggested by
Marsaglia). In this paper we explore the space of possible generators obtained by multiplying the result of
a xorshift generator by a suitable constant. We sample generators at 100 points of their state space and
obtain detailed statistics that lead us to choices of parameters that improve on the current ones. We then
explore for the first time the space of high-dimensional xorshift generators, following another suggestion
in Marsaglia’s paper, finding choices of parameters providing periods of length 21024 − 1 and 24096 − 1.
The resulting generators are of extremely high quality, faster than current similar alternatives, and generate
long-period sequences passing strong statistical tests using only eight logical operations, one addition and
one multiplication by a constant.
Categories and Subject Descriptors: G.3 [PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS]: Random number generation; G.3 [PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS]: Experimental design
General Terms: Algorithms, Experimentation, Measurement
Additional Key Words and Phrases: Pseudorandom number generators
1. INTRODUCTION
xorshift generators are a simple class of pseudorandom number generators introduced
by Marsaglia [2003]. In Marsaglia’s view, their main feature is speed: in particular, a
xorshift generator with a 64-bit state generates a new 64-bit value using just three 64-bit
shifts and three 64-bit xors (i.e., exclusive ors), thus making it possible to generate hundreds
of millions of values per second.
Subsequent analysis by Brent [2004] showed that the bits generated by xorshift generators are equivalent to certain linear feedback shift registers. Panneton and L’Ecuyer [2005]
analyzed in detail the theoretical properties of the generators, and found empirical weaknesses using the TestU01 suite [L’Ecuyer and Simard 2007]. They proposed an increase in
the number of shifts, or combination with another generator, to improve quality.
In the first part of this paper, as warm-up we explore experimentally the space of
xorshift generators with 64 bits of state using statistical test suites. We sample generators
at 100 points of their state space, to easily identify spurious failures. Marsaglia proposes
some choice of parameters, that, as we will see, and as already reported by Panneton and
L’Ecuyer [2005], are not particularly good. We report results that are actually worse than
those of Panneton and L’Ecuyer as we use the entire 64-bit output of the generators. While
we can suggest some good parameter choices, the result remains poor.
Thus, we turn to the idea of scrambling the result of a xorshift generator using a
multiplication, as it is typical, for instance, in the construction of practical hash functions
due to the resulting avalanching behavior (bits of the result depend on several bits of the
input). This method is actually suggested in passing in Marsaglia’s paper. The third edition
of the classic “Numerical Recipes” [Press et al. 2007], indeed, proposes this construction for
This work is supported the EU-FET grant NADINE (GA 288956).
This paper is an extended version of the paper with the same title published in the ACM Transactions on
Mathematical Software [Vigna 2016].
Author’s addresses: Sebastiano Vigna, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, via
Comelico 39, 20135 Milano MI, Italy.
2
S. Vigna
A0
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
<<
>>
<<
>>
<<
>>
>>
<<
a;
a;
c;
c;
a;
a;
b;
b;
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
C code
^= x >>
^= x <<
^= x >>
^= x <<
^= x <<
^= x >>
^= x <<
^= x >>
b;
b;
b;
b;
c;
c;
a;
a;
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
^=
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
<<
>>
<<
>>
>>
<<
<<
>>
c;
c;
a;
a;
b;
b;
c;
c;
X1
X3
X2
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
Fig. 1. The eight possible xorshift64 algorithms. The list is actually derived from Panneton and L’Ecuyer
[2005], as they correctly remarked that two of the eight algorithms proposed by Marsaglia were redundant,
whereas two (A6 and A7 ) were missing. On the right side we report the name of the linear transformation
associated to the algorithm as denoted by Panneton and L’Ecuyer [2005]. With our numbering, algorithms
A2i and A2i+1 are conjugate by reversal. Note that contiguous shifts in the same direction can be exchanged
without affecting the resulting algorithm. We normalized such contiguous shifts so that their letters are
lexicographically sorted.
a basic, all-purpose generator. From the wealth of data so obtained we derive generators
with better statistical properties than those suggested in “Numerical Recipes”.
In the last part of the paper, we follow the suggestion about high-dimensional generators
contained in Marsaglia’s paper, and compute several choices of parameters that provide
full-period xorshift generators with a state of 1024 and 4096 bits. Once again, we propose
generators that use a multiplication to scramble the result.
At the end of the paper, we apply the same methodology to a number of popular noncryptographic generators, and we discover that our high-dimensional generators are actually
faster and of higher or equivalent statistical quality, as assessed by statistical test suites,
than the alternatives.
The software used to perform the experiments described in this paper is distributed by
the author under the GNU General Public License. Moreover, all files generated during the
experiments are available from the author. They contain a large amount of data that could
be further analyzed (e.g., by studying the distribution of p-values over the seeds). We leave
this issue open for further work.
2. AN INTRODUCTION TO xorshift GENERATORS
The basic idea of xorshift generators is that their state is modified by applying repeatedly
a shift and an exclusive-or (xor) operation. In this paper we consider 64-bit shifts and states
made of 2n bits, with n ≥ 6. We usually append n to the name of a family of generators
when we need to restrict the discussion to a specific state size.
For xorshift64 generators Marsaglia suggests a number of possible combination of shifts,
shown in Figure 1. Not all choices of parameters give a full (264 − 1) period: there are 275
suitable choices of a, b and c and eight variants, totaling 2200 generators.
In linear-algebra terms, if L is the 64 × 64 matrix on Z/2Z that effects a left shift of
one position on a binary row vector (i.e., L is all zeroes except for ones on the principal
subdiagonal) and if R is the right-shift matrix (the transpose of L), each left/right shift
and xor can be described as a linear multiplication by I + Ls or I + Rs , respectively,
where s is the amount of shifting.1 For instance, algorithm A0 of Figure 1 is equivalent to
the Z/2Z-linear transformation
X1 = I + La I + Rb I + Lc .
1A
more detailed study of the linear algebra behind xorshift generators can be found in [Marsaglia 2003;
Panneton and L’Ecuyer 2005].
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
3
It is useful to associate with a linear transformation M its characteristic polynomial
P (x) = det(M − xI).
The associated generator has maximum-length period if and only if P (x) is primitive over
Z/2Z. This happens if P (x) is irreducible and if x has maximum period in the ring of
n
polynomial over Z/2Z modulo P (x), that is, if the powers x, x2 , . . . , x2 −1 are distinct
modulo P (x). Finally, to check the latter condition is sufficient to check that
n
x(2
−1)/p
6= 1
mod P (x)
n
for every prime p dividing 2 − 1 [Lidl and Niederreiter 1994].
The weight of P (x) is the number of terms in P (x), that is, the number of nonzero
coefficients. It is considered a good property for generators of this kind that the weight is
close to n/2, that is, that the polynomial is neither too sparse nor too dense [Compagner
1991].
Note that the family of algorithms of Figure 1 is intended to generate 64-bit values. This
means that the entire output of the algorithm should be used when performing tests. We
will see that this has not always been the case in previous literature.
3. SETTING UP THE EXPERIMENTS
In this paper we want to explore experimentally the space of a number of xorshift-based
generators. Our purpose is to identify variants with full period which have particularly good
statistical properties, and test whether claims about good parameters made in the previous
literature are confirmed.
The basic idea is that of sampling the generators by executing a battery of tests starting
with 100 different seeds that are equispaced in the state space. More precisely, if the state
is made of n bits we use the seeds 1 + ib2n /100c, 0 ≤ i < 100. The tests produce a number
of statistics, and we decided to use as score the number of failed tests. A higher score, thus,
means lower quality. Running multiple tests makes it easy to rule out spurious failures, as
suggested also by Rukhin et al. [2001] in the context of cryptographic applications.2
We use two tools to perform our tests. The first and most important is TestU01, a test
suite developed by L’Ecuyer and Simard [2007] that contains several tests oriented towards
the generation of uniform real numbers in [0 . . 1).3 We also perform tests using Dieharder, a
suite of tests developed by Brown [2013], both as a sanity check and to compare the power
of the two suites. Dieharder contains all original tests from Marsaglia’s Diehard, plus many
more additional tests. We refer frequently to the specific type of tests failed: the reader can
refer to the TestU01 and Dieharder documentation for more information.
We consider a test failed if its p-value is outside of the interval [0.001 . . 0.999]. This is
the interval outside which TestU01 reports a test by default. Sometimes a much stricter
threshold is used (For instance, L’Ecuyer and Simard [2007] use [10−10 . . 1 − 10−10 ] when
applying TestU01 to a variety of generators), and weaker p-values are called suspicious
values, but since we are going to repeat the test 100 times we can use relatively weak pvalues: spurious failures will appear rarely, and we can catch borderline cases (e.g., tests
failing on 50% of the seeds) that give us useful information.
We call systematic a failure that happens for all seeds. For all such failures in our tests,
p-values are smaller than 10−15 . Thus, all conclusions drawn in this paper based on system2 We
remark that, arguably, a more principled choice would be choosing seeds that are equispaced in the
sequence of states traversed by the generator. Unfortunately, this is possible only for generators with “jumpahead” primitives, and we want our methodology to be universal. We checked that all sequences of states
used in our tests on generators with 64 bits of state do not overlap. The chance that this happens with
more than 128 bits of state is negligible.
3 We use the double-dot notation for intervals introduced by C. A. R. Hoare and Lyle Ramshaw [Graham
et al. 1994].
4
S. Vigna
atic failures would not change even if we lowered significantly the failure threshold. More
generally, 90% of the p-values of failed tests are actually smaller than 10−6 .
We remark that our choice (counting the number of failures) is somewhat rough; for
example, we consider the same failure a p-value very close to 0 and a p-value just below
0.001. Indeed, other, more sophisticated methods might be used to aggregate the result of
our samples: combining p-values, for instance, or computing a p-value of p-values [Rukhin
et al. 2001]. However, our choice is very easy to interpret, and multiple samples partially
compensate this problem (spurious failures will appear in few samples).
Of course, the number of experiments is very large—in fact, our experiments were carried
out using hundreds of cores in parallel and, overall, they add up to more than a century of
computational time. Our strategy is to apply a very fast test to all generators and seeds,
in the hope of isolating a small group of generators that behave significantly better with
respect to these tests. Stronger tests can then be applied to this subset. The same strategy
has been followed by Panneton [2004] in the experimental study of xorshift generators
contained in his Ph.D. thesis.
TestU01 offers three different predefined batteries of tests (SmallCrush, Crush and
BigCrush) with increasing computational cost and increased difficulty. Unfortunately,
Dieharder does not provide such a segmentation.
Note that Dieharder has a concept of “weak” success and a concept of “failure”, depending
on the p-value of the test, and we used command-line options to align its behavior with that
of TestU01: a p-value outside of the range [0.001 . . 0.999] is a failure. Moreover, we disabled
the initial timing tests so that exactly the same stream of 64-bit numbers is fed to the two
test suites.
In both cases we implemented our own xorshift generator. Some care is needed in this
phase, as both TestU01 and Dieharder are inherently 32-bit test suites: since we want to
test xorshift as a 64-bit generator, it is important that all bits produced are actually
fed into the test. For this reason, we implemented the generation of a uniform real value in
[0 . . 1) by dividing the output of the generator by 264 , but we implemented the generation of
uniform 32-bit integer values by returning first the lower and then the upper 32 bits of each
64-bit generated value.4 A possible downside of this approach is that we might fail to detect
some failure in the high bits (of the 64-bit, full output) due to the interleaving process:
however, the fact that in our tests xorshift generators generate many more failures than
those reported previously [Panneton and L’Ecuyer 2005] suggests that the approach is well
founded.
An important consequence of this choice is that some of the bits are actually not used at
all. When analyzing pseudorandom real numbers in the unit interval, there is an unavoidable bias towards high bits, as they are more significant. The very lowest bits have lesser
importance and will in any case be perturbed by numerical errors. For this reason, it is a
good practice to run tests both on a generator and on its reverse5 [Press et al. 2007]. In
our case, this is even more necessary, as the lowest eleven bits returned by the generator
are not used at all due to the fact that the mantissa of a 64-bit floating-point number is
formed by 53 bits only.
A recent example shows the importance of testing the reverse generator. Saito and Matsumoto [2014] propose a different way to eliminate linear artifacts: instead of multiplying
the output of an underlying xorshift generator (with 128 bits of state and based on 32-bit
shifts) by a constant, they add it (in Z/232 Z) with the previous output. Since the sum
in Z/232 Z is not linear over Z/2Z, the result should be free of linear artifacts. However,
while their generator passes BigCrush, its reverse fails systematically the LinearComp, Ma-
4 If
a real value is generated when the upper 32 bits of the last value are available, they are simply discarded.
is, on the generator obtained by reversing the order of the 64 bits returned.
5 That
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
5
trixRank, MaxOft and Permutation test of BigCrush, which highlights a significant weakness
in its lower bits.
We remark that in this paper we do not pursue the search for equidistribution—the
property that all tuples of consecutive values, seen as vectors in the unit cube, are evenly
distributed, as done, for instance, by Panneton and L’Ecuyer [2005]. Brent [2010] has already
argued in detail that for long-period generators equidistribution is not particularly desirable,
as it is a property of the whole sequence produced by the generator, and in the case of
a long-period generator only a minuscule fraction of the sequence can be actually used.
Moreover, equidistribution is currently impossible to evaluate exactly for long-period nonlinear generators, and in the formulation commonly used in the literature it is known to be
biased towards the high bits [L’Ecuyer and Panneton 2005]: for instance, the WELL1024a
generator has been designed to be maximally equidistributed [Panneton et al. 2006], and
indeed it has measure of equidistribution ∆1 = 0, but the generator obtained by reversing
its bits has ∆1 = 366: a quite counterintuitive result, as in general we expect all bits to be
equally important.
Another problem with equidistribution is that it is intrinsically unstable, unless we restrict
its usage to the class of linear generators, only. Indeed, if we take a maximally equidistributed
sequence, no matter how long, and we flip the most significant bit of a single element of the
sequence, the new sequence will have the worst possible ∆1 . For instance, by flipping the
most significant bit of a single chosen value out of the output of WELL1024a we can turn its
equidistribution measure to ∆1 = 4143. But for any statistical or practical purpose the two
sequences are indistinguishable—we are modifying one bit out of 25 (21024 − 1). However, in
general this paradoxical behaviour is not a big issue, because the modified sequence can no
longer be emitted by a linear generator.
We note that since multiplication by an invertible constant induces a permutation of the
space of 64-bit values (and thus of t-tuples of such values), it preserves some of the equidistribution properties of the underlying generator (this is true of any bijective scrambling
function); more details will be given in the rest of the paper.
4. RESULTS FOR xorshift64 GENERATORS
First of all, all generators fail at all seeds the MatrixRank test from TestU01’s SmallCrush
suite.6 A score-rank plot7 of the SmallCrush scores for all generators is shown in Figure 2.
The plot associates with abscissa x the number of generators with x or more failures. We
observe immediately that there is a wide range of quality among the generators examined.
The “bumps” in the plot corresponds to new tests failed systematically.
A closer inspection would confirm that there is just a weak correlation between scores
of algorithms conjugate by reversal, because of the bias of TestU01 towards high bits. We
thus report in Table I reports the best four generators by combined scores (i.e., adding
the scores of conjugate generators), which are the only ones failing systematically just the
MatrixRank test. The table reports also results for the generator A0 (13, 7, 17) suggested by
Marsaglia in his original paper, claiming that it “will provide an excellent period 264 − 1
RNG, [. . . ] but any of the above 2200 choices is likely to do as well”. Clearly, this is not
the case: A0 (13, 7, 17)/A1 (13, 7, 17) ranks 655 in the combined SmallCrush ranking and fails
systematically several tests.
6 Panneton
and L’Ecuyer [2005] reports that half of the generators fail this test, but the authors have chosen
to use only 32 of the 64 generated bits as output bits, in practice applying a kind of decimation to the
output of the generator.
7 Score-rank plots are the numerosity-based discrete analogous of the complementary cumulative distribution
function of scores. They give a much clearer picture than frequency dot plots when the data points are
scattered and highly variable.
6
S. Vigna
2500
2000
Rank
1500
1000
500
0
100
1000
SmallCrush score
10000
Fig. 2. Score-rank plot of the distribution of SmallCrush scores for the 2200 possible full-period xorshift64
generators.
Table I. Best four xorshift64 generators following SmallCrush.
Algorithm
A2 (11, 31, 18)
A2 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (11, 31, 18)
A0 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
111
155
159
130
276
Conjugate
A3 (11, 31, 18)
A3 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (11, 31, 18)
A1 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
120
115
112
150
802
Overall
231
270
271
280
1078
W
25
35
35
25
25
Table II. The generators of Table I tested with BigCrush.
Algorithm
A2 (11, 31, 18)
A2 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (11, 31, 18)
A2 (4, 35, 21)
A0 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
762
747
749
748
961
1049
Conjugate
A3 (11, 31, 18)
A3 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (11, 31, 18)
A3 (4, 35, 21)
A1 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
750
780
884
926
1444
5454
Overall
1512
1527
1633
1674
2405
6503
Sanity check 1. Is the result of our experiments dependent on our seed choice? To answer this question, we repeated our experiments on xorshift64 generators with SmallCrush
on a different set of seeds, namely the integers in the interval [1 . . 100]. Kendall’s τ [Kendall
1938; Kendall 1945] between the two rankings is 0.98, which makes it clear that the dependence on the seed is negligible. In particular, the four best conjugate pairs in Table I are the
same with both seeds.
To gather more information, we ran the full BigCrush suite and Dieharder on our four
best generators, on Marsaglia’s choice and on the best choice from “Numerical Recipes”:
the results are given in Tables II and III. Even the four best generators fail now systematically the BirthdaySpacings, MatrixRank and LinearComp tests. The first two generators,
however, turn out to perform slightly better than other two. We also notice that BigCrush
draws a much thicker line between our four best generators and the other ones, which now
fail several more tests. Not surprisingly, Dieharder cannot really separate our four best
generators from A2 (4, 35, 21)/A3 (4, 35, 21).
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
7
Table III. The generators of Table I tested with Dieharder.
Algorithm
A2 (11, 31, 18)
A2 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (8, 29, 19)
A0 (11, 31, 18)
A2 (4, 35, 21)
A0 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
182
179
176
181
189
183
Conjugate
A3 (11, 31, 18)
A3 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (8, 29, 19)
A1 (11, 31, 18)
A3 (4, 35, 21)
A1 (13, 7, 17)
Failures
162
181
182
186
187
1352
Overall
344
360
358
367
376
1535
Equidistribution score (combined)
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
0
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
SmallCrush score (combined)
Fig. 3. Scatter plot of the combined SmallCrush score of conjugate xorshift64 generators versus the
combined equidistribution score.
4.1. Equidistribution
It is interesting to compare the ranking provided by equidistribution properties and that
provided by statistical tests. Note that a xorshift64 generator is 1-dimensionally equidistributed, that is, every 64-bit value appears exactly once except for zero. We refer to the
already quoted paper by Panneton and L’Ecuyer [2005] for a detailed description of the
equidistribution statistics ∆1 , the sum of dimension gaps: a lower value is better. A maximally distributed generator has ∆1 = 0, and we will refer to ∆1 as to the equidistribution
score. We computed the equidistribution score for all generators using the implementation
of Harase’s algorithm [Harase 2011] contained in the MTToolBox package from Saito [2013].
Similarly to SmallCrush scores, ∆1 has high-bits bias, and a quite strong one [L’Ecuyer and
Panneton 2005]. For a fair comparison, we to thus combine the ∆1 score of a generator and
of its reverse.
Figure 3 shows that there is some correlation (τ = 0.58) between combined SmallCrush
scores and combined equidistribution scores. Nonetheless, even if equidistribution is able to
detect reliably generators with a very bad SmallCrush score, is not so good at detecting the
generators with the best score, as is visible from the quite noisy lower left part of the plot.
Indeed, when we restrict our attention to the best 30 generators (by combined SmallCrush
scores) Kendall’s τ drops to 0.3. The first two generators by combined equidistribution
score, A4 (8, 29, 19) and A6 (8, 29, 19), rank 20 (combined score 361) and 170 (score 596) in
the combined SmallCrush test. When analyzed with the more powerful lens of BigCrush,
they have combined scores 3441 and 4082, respectively, and fail systematically almost twenty
additional tests with respect to the top four generators of Table II. Definitely, choosing
among xorshift64 generators by equidistribution score alone is not a good idea.
8
S. Vigna
Table IV. The three multipliers used in the rest of the paper. The subscripts recalls the t for
which they have good figures of merit.
M32 = 2685821657736338717
M8 = 1181783497276652981
M2 = 8372773778140471301
5. AN INTRODUCTION TO xorshift64* GENERATORS
Since a xorshift64 generator exhibits evident linearity artifacts, the next obvious step is to
perturb its output using a nonlinear (in Z/2Z sense) transformation. A natural candidate is
multiplication by a constant, also because such operation is very fast in modern processors.
Note that the current state of the generator is multiplied by a constant before returning it,
but the state itself is not affected by the multiplication: thus, the period is the same.
We call such a generator xorshift*. By choosing a constant invertible modulo 264 (i.e.,
odd), we can guarantee that the generator will output a permutation of the sequence output
by the underlying xorshift generator.
This approach was noted in passing in Marsaglia’s paper, and it is also proposed in a
more systematic way in the third edition of “Numerical Recipes” [Press et al. 2007] to
create a very fast, good-quality pseudorandom number generator. However, in the latter
case the authors first compute allegedly good triples for xorshift using Diehard (with
results markedly different from ours, and in strident contrast with TestU01’s results, as
discussed in Section 4) and then choose a multiplier. There is no reason why the best triples
for a xorshift64 generator (which are computed empirically) should continue to be such
in a xorshift64* generator: and indeed, we will see that this is not the case.
We thus repeated the experiments of the previous section on xorshift64* generators. To
choose scrambling constants, we followed the heuristic considerations of [Press et al. 2007].
We consider primitive (e.g., full-period) elements of the multiplicative group of Z/264 Z:
these elements have no fixed point except for zero, which is a very desirable property
for a scrambling function. Moreover, we choose from L’Ecuyer [1999] primitive elements
that have good qualities as multiplicative congruential linear generators, as we expect that
multiplication by such elements will combine bits in a non-trivial way.
We use a standard theoretical measure of quality, the figure of merit, which is a normalized best distance between the hyperplanes of families covering tuples of length t given by
successive outputs of the generators (see L’Ecuyer [1999] for details). Since t is an additional
parameter, to further understand the dependency on the multiplier we used three different
multipliers, shown in Table IV, which have good figures of merit for different t’s. The first
multiplier, M32 (the one used in [Press et al. 2007]) and the second, M8 , have been taken
from L’Ecuyer [1999]. The third, M2 , was kindly provided by Richard Simard.
We remark that many other choices for scrambling the output of a generator are possible,
like adding or xoring a fixed word, xoring the output with the output of another generator,
or using a bijective function with strong avalanching behavior, such as those used in the
construction of high-quality hash functions. The three factors we considered in our choice
are: speed, good results in statistical test suites, and preservation of some equidistribution
properties (similarly to the approach taken in [L’Ecuyer and Granger-Piché 2003]). For
instance, xoring with an additive Weyl generator (another suggestion in Marsaglia’s paper)
makes it in general impossible to prove any equidistribution property—not even that all 64bit value except for zero are output by the generator. Multiplication by a constant is a very
fast operation in modern processor, and mixing linear operations on Z/2Z with operations
in the ring Z/264 Z is a standard technique to avoid visible artifacts from either type of
algebraic structure. A drawback is that the lowest bit is, in fact, not scrambled, and thus
it is identical to the lowest bit of the underlying xorshift generator.8
8 As
remarked by one of the referees, since our multipliers are all equal to 1 modulo 4, this is true also of
the second-lowest bit.
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
9
SmallCrush score (reverse)
1000
100
10
1
1
10
100
SmallCrush score (standard)
1000
Fig. 4. Scatter plot of the SmallCrush score of xorshift64* generators and their reverse.
2500
Standard
Reverse
Combined
2000
Rank
1500
1000
500
0
0
1
10
100
SmallCrush Score
1000
Fig. 5. Score-rank plot of the distribution of SmallCrush scores for the 2200 possible xorshift64* generators
with multiplier M32 .
6. RESULTS FOR xorshift64* GENERATORS
The scatter plot in Figure 4 shows that there is essentially no correlation between the scores
assigned by SmallCrush to a generator and its reverse (τ = 0.15).9 Another interesting
observation on Figure 4 is that the lower right half is essentially empty. So bad generators
have a bad reverse, but there are good generators with a very bad reverse. This suggests
that the quality of a xorshift64* generator can vary wildly from the low to the high bits.
A score-rank plot of the SmallCrush scores for all generators shown in Figure 5 provides
us with further interesting information: almost all generators have no systematic failure,
but only about half of the reverse generators have no systematic failure. Moreover, the
distribution of standard generators degrades smoothly, whereas the distribution of reverse
generators sports again the “bump” phenomenon we observed in Figure 2.
Since we need to reduce the number of candidates to apply stronger tests, in the case of
M32 we decided to restrict our choice to generators with 3 overall failed tests or less, which
left us with 152 generators. Similar cutoff points were chosen for M8 and M2 .
9 We
report plots only for M32 , as the ones for the other multipliers are visually identical.
10
S. Vigna
1000
Dieharder score (reverse)
Crush score (reverse)
10000
1000
100
10
1
1
10
100
1000 10000
Crush score (standard)
100
10
1
1
10
100
1000
Dieharder score (standard)
Fig. 6. Scatter plots for Crush (left) and Dieharder (right) scores on xorshift64* generators with multiplier
M32 and their reverse, for the 152 best generators.
Dieharder score
1000
100
10
10
100
1000
Crush score
10000
Fig. 7. A scatter plot of Crush and Diehard combined scores of the 152 SmallCrush-best xorshift64*
generators. The plot is in log-log scale to accommodate some very high values returned by Crush on reverse
generators. The lower-left “sweet spot” corner contains generators that never fail systematically (not even
reversed) in both test suites.
These generators were few enough so that we could apply both Crush and Dieharder.
Once again, we examine the correlation between the score of a generator and its reverse by
means of the scatter plots in Figure 6, which confirm the high-bits bias, albeit less so in the
Dieharder case.
In Figure 7 we compare instead the two scores (Crush and Dieharder) available. The most
remarkable feature is there are no points in the upper left corner: there is no generator that
is considered good by Crush but not by Dieharder. On the contrary, Crush heavily penalizes
(in particular because of the score on the reverse generator) a large number of generators.
The generators we will select in the end all belong to the small cloud in the lower left corner,
where the two test suite agree.
The score-rank plot in Figure 8 shows that our strategy pays off: we started with 152
generators with less than three failures, but analyzing them with the more powerful lens
provided by Crush we get a much more fine-grained analysis: in particular, only 73 of them
give no systematic failure, and they all belong to the “sweet spot” of Figure 7, that is, they
do not give any systematic failure in Dieharder, too.
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
11
160
Standard
Reverse
Combined
140
120
Rank
100
80
60
40
20
0
100
1000
Crush Score
Fig. 8. Score-rank plot of the distribution of Crush scores for the 152 SmallCrush-best xorshift64*
generators using multiplier M32 .
Finally, we selected for each multiplier the eight generators with the best Crush scores,
and applied the BigCrush suite: we obtained several generators failing systematically the
MatrixRank test only and shown in Table V (which should be compared with Table II).
6.1. Equidistribution
Multiplication by an invertible element just permutes the elements of Z/264 Z leaving
zero fixed, so a xorshift64* generator, like the underlying xorshift64 generator, is 1dimensionally equidistributed.
7. HIGH DIMENSION
Marsaglia [2003] describes a strategy for xorshift generators in high dimension: the idea
is to use always three low-dimensional shifts, but locating them in the context of a larger
t × t block matrix of the form
0 0 0 · · · 0 (I + La )(I + Rb )
I 0 0 ··· 0
0
0 I 0 ··· 0
0
M =
0
0 0 I ··· 0
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
···
0 0 0 ··· I
(I + Rc )
Marsaglia notes that even in this restricted form there are matrices of full period (he provides
examples for 32-bit shifts up to 160 bits). However, this route has not been explored for
high-dimensional (say, more than 1024 bits of state) generators. The only similar approach
is that proposed by Brent [2007] with his xorgens generators, which however uses four
shifts. The obvious question is thus: is the additional shift really necessary to pass a strong
statistical test such as BigCrush? We are thus going to look for good, full-period generators
with 1024 or 4096 bits of state using 64-bit basic shifts.10
10 The
reason why the number 4096 is relevant here is that we know the factorization of Fermat’s numbers
k
22 + 1 only up to k = 11. When more Fermat numbers will be factorized, it will be possible to design
xorshift or xorgens generators with larger state space [Brent 2007]. Note that, however, in practice a
period of 21024 − 1 is more than sufficient for any purpose. For example, even if 2100 computers were to
generate sequences of 2100 numbers starting from random seeds using a generator with period 21024 , the
chances that two sequences overlap would be less than 2−724 .
12
S. Vigna
Table V. Results of BigCrush on the best eight
xorshift64* generators found by SmallCrush
and Crush in sequence. The generators fail
systematically only MatrixRank.
Algorithm
A7 (11, 5, 45)
A7 (17, 23, 52)
A1 (12, 25, 27)
A1 (17, 23, 29)
A5 (14, 23, 33)
A5 (17, 47, 29)
A1 (16, 25, 43)
A7 (23, 9, 57)
A5 (11, 5, 32)
A2 (8, 31, 17)
A5 (3, 21, 31)
A3 (17, 45, 22)
A4 (8, 37, 21)
A3 (13, 47, 23)
A3 (13, 35, 30)
A4 (9, 37, 31)
A7 (13, 19, 28)
A3 (9, 21, 40)
A1 (14, 23, 33)
A7 (19, 43, 27)
A1 (17, 47, 28)
A5 (16, 11, 27)
A4 (4, 35, 15)
A7 (13, 21, 18)
Failures
S
R
M32
226
128
232
130
230
133
229
137
238
132
231
141
238
138
242
134
M8
229
122
229
126
230
141
241
133
239
136
232
144
244
136
243
141
M2
228
128
228
132
234
142
239
137
240
137
234
144
230
149
238
144
+
W
354
362
363
366
370
372
376
376
23
25
31
21
32
24
31
19
351
355
371
374
375
376
380
384
13
21
33
27
33
27
27
27
356
360
376
376
377
378
379
382
23
35
29
23
25
25
35
31
The output of such generators will be given by the last 64 bits of the state. It is well
known [Brent 2004; Niederreiter 1992] that every bit of state satisfies a linear recurrence
(defined by the characteristic polynomial) with full period, so a fortiori the last 64 bits
have full period, too.
Since we already know that some deficiencies of low-dimensional xorshift generators
are well corrected by multiplication by a constant, we will follow the same approach, thus
looking for good xorshift* generators of high dimension.11 Note that since multiplication
by an integer invertible in Z/264 Z is a permutation of Z/264 Z, a high-dimension xorshift*
generator has the same period of the underlying xorshift generator.
We cannot in principle claim full period if we look at a single bit of the output of
a xorshift* generator; but this property can be easily proved by purely combinatorial
means:
11 As
in the xorshift64 case, different choices for the shifts are possible. We will not pursue them here.
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
13
Proposition 7.1. Let x0 , x1 , . . . , x2n −2 be a list of 2t -bit values, t ≤ n, such that
every value appears 2n−t times, except for 0, which appears 2n−t − 1 times. Then, for every
fixed bit k the associated sequence has period 2n − 1.
Proof. Suppose that there is a k and a p | 2n − 1 such that the k-th bit of x0 , x1 ,
. . . , x2n −2 has period p (that is, the sequence of bits associated with the k-th bit is made by
(2n − 1)/p repetitions of the same sequence of p bits). The k-th bit runs through 2n−1 − 1
zeroes and 2n−1 ones (as there is a missing zero in the output sequence). This means
that (2n − 1)/p | 2n−1 , too, as the same number of ones must appear in every repeating
subsequence, and since (2n − 1)/p is odd this implies p = 2n − 1.
Corollary 7.2. Every bit of the output of a full-period xorshift* generator has full
period.
7.1. Finding good shifts
The first step is identifying values of a, b and c for which the generator has maximum
period using the primitivity check on the characteristic polynomial. We performed these
computations using the algebra package Fermat [Lewis 2013], with the restriction that
a + b ≤ 64 and that a is coprime with b (see [Brent 2007] for the rationale behind this
choices, which significantly reduce the search space). The resulting sets of values are those
shown in Table VI and VIII.
For a state of 1024 bits, we obtain 20 possible parameter choices, which we examined in
combination with our three multipliers both through BigCrush and through Dieharder. The
results, reported in Table VI and VII, are excellent: with the exception of two pathological
choices, no test is failed systematically. For a state of 4096 bits (Table VIII and IX) there
are 10 possible parameter choices, and no generator fails a test systematically.
7.2. Equidistribution
Looking at the shape of the matrix defining high-dimensional xorshift generators it is clear
that if the state is made of n bits the last n/64 output values, concatenated, are equal to
the current state. This implies that such generators are n/64-dimensionally equidistributed
(i.e., every n/64-tuple of consecutive 64-bit values appears exactly once, except for a missing tuple of zeroes), so xorshift1024 generators are 16-dimensionally equidistributed and
xorshift4096 generators are 64-dimensionally equidistributed. Since multiplication by a
constant just permutes the space of tuples, the same is true of the associated xorshift*
generators.
8. JUMPING AHEAD
The simple form of a xorshift generator makes it trivial to jump ahead quickly by any
number of next-state steps. If v is the current state, we want to compute vM j for some
j. But M j is always expressible as a polynomial in M of degree lesser than that of the
characteristic polynomial. To find such a polynomial it suffices to compute xj mod P (x),
where P (x) is the characteristic polynomial of M . Such a computation can be easily carried
k
out using standard techniques (quadratures to find x2 mod P (x), etc.), leaving us with a
polynomial Q(x) such that Q(M ) = M j . Now, if
Q(x) =
n
X
αi xi ,
i=0
we have
vM j = vQ(M ) =
n
X
i=0
αi vM i ,
S. Vigna
14
S
25
28
37
37
23
28
34
32
44
37
45
42
35
38
34
43
45
39
31
50
M32
Failures
R
+
31
56
32
60
24
61
26
63
40
63
37
65
34
68
36
68
28
72
36
73
29
74
34
76
43
78
40
78
45
79
40
83
39
84
51
90
890 921
902 952
275
79
223
65
167
265
113
155
227
59
89
281
363
77
233
81
255
69
111
99
W
1, 13, 7
3, 26, 35
40, 11, 31
15, 16, 19
22, 7, 48
9, 14, 41
41, 7, 29
31, 11, 30
2, 11, 61
10, 11, 61
7, 16, 55
16, 23, 30
25, 8, 15
27, 13, 46
31, 10, 27
9, 5, 60
31, 33, 37
10, 9, 63
51, 1, 46
47, 1, 41
a, b, c
S
28
29
24
30
29
32
25
33
25
42
32
35
25
39
40
40
39
31
60
67
M8
Failures
R
+
19
47
22
51
33
57
32
62
33
62
30
62
38
63
32
65
41
66
25
67
35
67
34
69
45
70
32
71
32
72
36
76
39
78
49
80
896 956
907 974
113
89
77
255
223
167
265
363
81
155
65
59
281
275
233
227
79
69
111
99
W
3, 26, 35
27, 13, 46
25, 8, 15
31, 10, 27
9, 5, 60
1, 13, 7
15, 16, 19
2, 11, 61
41, 7, 29
9, 14, 41
22, 7, 48
31, 11, 30
7, 16, 55
31, 33, 37
10, 11, 61
16, 23, 30
40, 11, 31
10, 9, 63
51, 1, 46
47, 1, 41
a, b, c
S
29
41
38
36
24
28
36
40
36
33
37
45
36
37
41
44
38
48
31
47
M2
Failures
R
+
24
53
20
61
24
62
31
67
43
67
42
70
34
70
30
70
34
70
37
70
35
72
27
72
39
75
39
76
37
78
37
81
48
86
48
96
799 830
799 846
89
275
281
233
227
113
255
81
265
167
223
363
65
79
155
59
77
69
111
99
W
Table VI. Results of BigCrush on the xorshift1024* generators. The last two generators fail systematically CouponCollector, Gap,
HammingIndep, MatrixRank, SumCollector and WeightDistrib.
a, b, c
27, 13, 46
31, 33, 37
22, 7, 48
7, 16, 55
9, 14, 41
41, 7, 29
1, 13, 7
10, 11, 61
9, 5, 60
16, 23, 30
3, 26, 35
25, 8, 15
31, 11, 30
40, 11, 31
31, 10, 27
2, 11, 61
15, 16, 19
10, 9, 63
51, 1, 46
47, 1, 41
31, 33, 37
31, 11, 30
16, 23, 30
41, 7, 29
9, 14, 41
10, 9, 63
22, 7, 48
51, 1, 46
27, 13, 46
25, 8, 15
3, 26, 35
2, 11, 61
40, 11, 31
31, 10, 27
47, 1, 41
9, 5, 60
10, 11, 61
15, 16, 19
7, 16, 55
1, 13, 7
a, b, c
M32
Failures
S
R
+
57
67 124
65
61 126
74
56 130
71
61 132
74
64 138
74
66 140
66
75 141
78
63 141
63
79 142
80
64 144
81
66 147
79
71 150
74
76 150
82
71 153
74
79 153
81
75 156
75
84 159
72
88 160
94
68 162
87
76 163
79
363
59
265
167
69
223
111
275
281
89
81
77
233
99
227
155
255
65
113
W
25, 8, 15
16, 23, 30
7, 16, 55
3, 26, 35
10, 11, 61
31, 10, 27
31, 33, 37
47, 1, 41
27, 13, 46
31, 11, 30
10, 9, 63
41, 7, 29
2, 11, 61
9, 14, 41
40, 11, 31
15, 16, 19
51, 1, 46
22, 7, 48
1, 13, 7
9, 5, 60
a, b, c
M8
Failures
S
R
+
67
56 123
77
54 131
66
66 132
60
75 135
63
74 137
74
69 143
86
58 144
82
62 144
78
69 147
85
62 147
65
86 151
84
68 152
88
65 153
77
80 157
82
78 160
85
76 161
92
74 166
90
82 172
79
95 174
97
89 186
281
59
65
89
155
233
79
99
275
363
69
265
81
167
77
255
111
223
113
227
W
22, 7, 48
15, 16, 19
10, 9, 63
51, 1, 46
1, 13, 7
40, 11, 31
2, 11, 61
31, 11, 30
25, 8, 15
10, 11, 61
47, 1, 41
9, 5, 60
16, 23, 30
27, 13, 46
7, 16, 55
9, 14, 41
41, 7, 29
31, 10, 27
3, 26, 35
31, 33, 37
a, b, c
M2
Failures
S
R
+
56 76 132
66 67 133
70 71 141
65 78 143
80 64 144
80 67 147
85 65 150
75 75 150
74 77 151
79 76 155
70 86 156
70 86 156
81 76 157
78 80 158
92 70 162
87 80 167
87 81 168
82 87 169
92 79 171
98 88 186
Table VII. Results of Dieharder on xorshift1024* generators. No test is failed systematically.
223
255
69
111
113
77
81
363
281
155
99
227
59
275
65
167
265
233
89
79
W
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
15
S. Vigna
16
Algorithm
14, 41, 15
5, 22, 27
30, 29, 39
25, 3, 49
7, 12, 59
19, 34, 19
12, 11, 61
5, 27, 21
23, 26, 29
11, 9, 25
241
45
177
441
103
291
195
187
49
567
W
5, 22, 27
5, 27, 21
25, 3, 49
7, 12, 59
11, 9, 25
12, 11, 61
19, 34, 19
14, 41, 15
30, 29, 39
23, 26, 29
Algorithm
M8
Failures
R
+
35 69
35 71
37 72
39 73
34 74
33 74
35 74
34 77
37 79
43 81
S
34
36
35
34
40
41
39
43
42
38
45
187
441
103
567
195
291
241
177
49
W
11, 9, 25
5, 27, 21
25, 3, 49
19, 34, 19
23, 26, 29
30, 29, 39
12, 11, 61
14, 41, 15
7, 12, 59
5, 22, 27
Algorithm
Table VIII. Results of BigCrush on xorshift4096* generators.
M32
Failures
R
+
27 60
30 64
32 65
38 68
25 68
36 70
39 71
41 75
42 78
44 79
S
33
34
33
30
43
34
32
34
36
35
M2
Failures
R
+
33 63
27 64
34 67
36 75
35 75
37 75
37 77
42 78
44 82
50 88
S
30
37
33
39
40
38
40
36
38
38
W
567
187
441
291
49
177
195
241
103
45
25, 3, 49
12, 11, 61
30, 29, 39
5, 22, 27
11, 9, 25
19, 34, 19
14, 41, 15
7, 12, 59
23, 26, 29
5, 27, 21
Algorithm
M32
Failures
S
R
+
70
70 140
58
83 141
67
77 144
62
84 146
73
75 148
85
66 151
83
74 157
73
85 158
73
88 161
98
67 165
441
195
177
45
567
291
241
103
49
187
W
25, 3, 49
14, 41, 15
30, 29, 39
11, 9, 25
12, 11, 61
19, 34, 19
5, 22, 27
23, 26, 29
5, 27, 21
7, 12, 59
Algorithm
M8
Failures
S
R
+
67
70 137
72
69 141
70
75 145
73
77 150
75
80 155
89
67 156
93
65 158
72
87 159
75
84 159
90
77 167
441
241
177
567
195
291
45
49
187
103
W
19, 34, 19
5, 22, 27
25, 3, 49
5, 27, 21
11, 9, 25
14, 41, 15
23, 26, 29
12, 11, 61
7, 12, 59
30, 29, 39
Algorithm
Table IX. Results of Dieharder on xorshift4096* generators.
M2
Failures
S
R
+
75 64 139
67 77 144
77 71 148
77 71 148
81 76 157
79 78 157
74 84 158
74 85 159
84 79 163
78 89 167
291
45
441
187
567
241
49
195
103
177
W
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
17
18
S. Vigna
and now vM i is just the i-th state after the current one. If we known in advance the αi ’s,
computing vM j requires just computing the next state for n times, accumulating by xor
the i-th state iff αi 6= 0.12
In general, one needs to compute the αi ’s for each desired j, but the practical usage of this
technique is that of providing subsequences that are guaranteed to be non-overlapping. We
can fix a reasonable jump, for example 2512 for a xorshift1024* generator, and store the
αi ’s for such a jump as a bit mask. Operating the jump is now entirely trivial, as it requires
at most 1024 state changes. In Figure 12 we show the jump function for the generator of
Figure 11. By iterating the jump function, one can access 2512 non-overlapping sequences
of length 2512 (except for the last one, which will be of length 2512 − 1).
9. COMPARISON
How do our best xorshift* generators score with respect to more complex generators in
the literature? We decided to perform a comparison with the popular Mersenne Twister
MT19937 [Matsumoto and Nishimura 1998],13 with WELL1024a/WELL19937a, two generators
introduced by Panneton et al. [2006] as an improvement over the Mersenne Twister, and
with xorgens4096, a very recent 4096-bit generator introduced by Brent [2007] we mentioned in Section 7. All these generators are non-cryptographic and aim at fast, high-quality
generation. As usual, 100 tests are performed at 100 equispaced points of the state space.
We choose generators from the xorshift* family that perform well on both BigCrush
and Dieharder, have a good weight score and enough large parameters (which provide faster
state change spreading): more precisely, the xorshift64* generator A1 (12, 25, 27) · M32
(Figure 10), xorshift1024* with parameters 31, 11, 30 and multiplier M8 (Figure 11), and
xorshift4096* with parameters 25, 3, 49 and multiplier M2 .
9.1. Quality
Table X compares the BigCrush scores of the generators we discussed. The results are
quite interesting. A simple 64-bit xorshift* generator has less linear artifacts than
MT19937, WELL1024a or WELL19937a and, thus, a significantly better score. High-dimension
xorgens4096 and xorshift* generators perform significantly better, in spite of being extremely simple, and have no systematic failure. The 64-bit xorshift* generator suggested
by “Numerical Recipes” fails systematically the BirthdaySpacings test, contrarily the one
we have selected.14 We do not report the results of Dieharder, as at this level of quality the
suite is unable to make any significant distinction among the generators.
9.2. Escaping zeroland
We show in Figure 9 the speed at which a few of the generators of Table X “escape from
zeroland” [Panneton et al. 2006]: purely linearly recurrent generators with a very large state
space need a very long time to get from an initial state with a small number of ones to a state
in which the ones are approximately half. The figure shows a measure of escape time given
by the ratio of ones in a window of 4 consecutive 64-bit values sliding over the first 100 000
generated values, averaged over all possible seeds with exactly one bit set (see [Panneton
et al. 2006] for a detailed description).
As it is known, MT19937 needs hundreds of thousands of iterations to start behaving correctly. xorshift4096* and xorgens4096 need a few thousand (but xorgens4096 oscillates
12 Brent’s
ranut generator [Brent 1992] contains one of the first applications of this technique.
precisely, with its 64-bit version.
14 Note that we report the number of failed tests on our 100 seeds. L’Ecuyer and Simard [L’Ecuyer and
Simard 2007] report the number of types of failed tests (e.g., failing two distinct RandomWalk tests counts
as one) on a single run, so some care must be taken when comparing the results we report and those reported
by them.
13 More
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
19
Table X. A comparison of generators using BigCrush.
Algorithm
A1 (12, 25, 27) · M32
A3 (4, 35, 21) · M32
xorshift1024*
xorshift4096*
xorgens4096
MT19937
WELL1024a
WELL19937a
S
230
240
33
33
42
258
441
235
Failures
R
133
223
32
34
40
258
441
233
W/n
+
363
463
65
67
82
516
882
468
Systematic
0.48
0.38
0.35
0.11
0.23
0.34
0.40
0.43
MatrixRank
MatrixRank, BirthdaySpacings
—
—
—
LinearComp
MatrixRank, LinearComp
LinearComp
xorgens4096
MT19937
WELL1024a
WELL19937a
xorshift64*
xorshift1024*
xorshift4096*
Average number of ones
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
Samples
Fig. 9. Convergence to “half of the bits are ones in average” plot.
always around 1/2), WELL19937a and xorshift1024* a few hundreds, whereas WELL1024a
just a few dozens, and xorshift64* is almost unaffected.
Table XI condenses Figure 9 into the mean and standard deviation of the displayed values.
Clearly, the multiplication step helps in reducing the correlation between the number of ones
in the state and the number of ones in the output values. Also, the slowness in recovering
from states with too many zeroes it directly correlated to the size of the state space—a very
good argument against linear generators with too large state spaces.
9.3. Speed
Finally, we benchmark the generators of Table X. Our tests were run on an Intel R CoreTM
i7-4770 CPU @3.40GHz (Haswell), and the results are shown in Table XII (variance is
undetectable, as we generate 1010 values in each test). We also report as a strong baseline
results about SFMT19937, the SIMD-Oriented Fast Mersenne Twister [Saito and Matsumoto
2008], a 128-bit version of the Mersenne Twister based on the SSE2 extended instruction
set of Intel processors (and thus not usable, in principle, on other processors). We used
suitable options to keep the compiler from unrolling loops or extracting loop invariants.
20
S. Vigna
Table XI. Mean and standard deviation for the data
shown in Figure 9.
Algorithm
xorshift64*
xorgens4096
xorshift1024*
WELL1024a
xorshift4096*
WELL19937a
MT19937
Mean
0.5000
0.5000
0.5000
0.4999
0.4992
0.4983
0.2823
Standard deviation
0.0039
0.0031
0.0035
0.0036
0.0110
0.0185
0.1705
Table XII. Time to emit a 64-bit integer on an Intel R
CoreTM i7-4770 CPU @3.40GHz (Haswell).
Algorithm
xorshift64*
xorshift1024*
xorshift4096*
xorgens4096
MT19937 (64-bit version)
SFMT19937
WELL1024a
WELL19937a
Speed (ns/64 bits)
1.58
1.36
1.36
2.06
2.84
1.80
10.31
7.45
The highest speed is achieved by the high-dimensional xorshift* generators. SFMT19937
is a major improvement in speed over MT19937, albeit slightly slower than a high-dimensional
xorshift* generator; it fails systematically, moreover, the same tests of MT19937.
A xorshift64* generator is actually slower than its high-dimensional counterparts. This
is not surprising, as the three shift/xors in a xorshift64* generator form a dependency
chain and must be executed in sequence, whereas two of the shifts of a higher-dimension
generator are independent and can be internally parallelized by the CPU. WELL1024a and
WELL19937a are heavily penalized by their 32-bit structure.
#include <stdint.h>
uint64_t x;
uint64_t next(void) {
x ^= x >> 12; // a
x ^= x << 25; // b
x ^= x >> 27; // c
return x * UINT64_C(2685821657736338717);
}
Fig. 10. The suggested xorshift64* generator in C99 code. The variable x should be initialized to a nonzero
seed before calling next().
10. CONCLUSIONS
After our careful experimental analysis, we reach the following conclusions:
A xorshift1024* generator is an excellent choice for a general-purpose, highspeed generator. The statistical quality of the generator is very high (it has, actually,
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
21
#include <stdint.h>
uint64_t s[16];
int p;
uint64_t next(void) {
const uint64_t s0 = s[p];
uint64_t s1 = s[p = (p + 1) & 15];
s1 ^= s1 << 31; // a
s[p] = s1 ^ s0 ^ (s1 >> 11) ^ (s0 >> 30); // b,c
return s[p] * UINT64_C(1181783497276652981);
}
Fig. 11. The suggested xorshift1024* generator in C99 code. The array s should be initialized to a nonzero
seed before calling next().
#include <stdint.h>
#include <string.h>
void jump(void) {
static const uint64_t JUMP[] = {
0x84242f96eca9c41d, 0xa3c65b8776f96855,
0x4489affce4f31a1e, 0x2ffeeb0a48316f40,
0x3659132bb12fea70, 0xaac17d8efa43cab8,
0x5ee975283d71c93b, 0x691548c86c1bd540,
0x0b5fc64563b3e2a8, 0x047f7684e9fc949d,
0x284600e3f30e38c3
};
0x5b34a39f070b5837,
0xdc2d9891fe68c022,
0xc4cb815590989b13,
0x7910c41d10a1e6a5,
0xb99181f2d8f685ca,
uint64_t t[16] = { 0 };
for(int i = 0; i < sizeof JUMP / sizeof *JUMP; i++)
for(int b = 0; b < 64; b++) {
if (JUMP[i] & 1ULL << b)
for(int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
t[j] ^= s[(j + p) & 15];
next();
}
for(int j = 0; j < 16; j++)
s[(j + p) & 15] = t[j];
}
Fig. 12. The jump function for the xorshift1024* generator of Figure 11 in C99 code. It is equivalent to
2512 calls to next().
the best results in BigCrush), and its period is so large that the probability of overlapping sequences is practically zero, even in the largest parallel simulation (and strictly nonoverlapping sequences can be easily generated using the jump function). Nonetheless, the
state space is reasonably small, so that seeding it with high-quality bits is not too expensive,
and recovery from states with a large number of zeroes happens quickly. The generator is
also blazingly fast (it is actually the fastest generator we tested). The reasonable state space
makes it also easier, in case a large number of generators is used at the same time, to fit
their state into the cache. In any case, with respect to other generators, the state is accessed
22
S. Vigna
in a more localized way, as read and write operations happen at two consecutive locations,
and thus will generate at most one cache miss.
In case memory is an issue, or array access is expensive, a very good generalpurpose generator is a xorshift64* generator. While the generator A1 (12, 25, 27)·M32
fails systematically the MatrixRank test, it has less linear artifacts than MT19937, WELL1024a
or WELL19937a, which fail systematically even more tests. It is a very good choice if memory
footprint is an issue and a very large number of generators is necessary. It can also be used,
for instance, to generate the initial state of another generator with a larger state space using
a 64-bit seed. We remark that a xorshift64* generator can also actually be faster than a
xorshift1024* generator if the underlying language incurs significant costs when accessing
an array: for instance, in Java a xorshift64* generator emits a value in 1.62 ns, whereas a
xorshift1024* generator needs 2.06 ns.
Linear generators with an excessively long period have a number of problems
that are not compensated by higher statistical quality. WELL19937a is almost four
slower than xorshift1024*, and has a worse performance in BigCrush; moreover, recovery
from states with many zeroes, albeit enormously improved with respect to MT19937, is still
very slow, and seeding properly the generator requires almost twenty thousands random
bits. In the end, it is in general difficult to motivate state spaces larger than 21024 . Similar
considerations are made by Press et al. [2007] and L’Ecuyer and Panneton [2005].
Surprisingly simple and fast generators can produce sequences that pass strong
statistical tests. The code in Figure 11 is extremely shorter and simpler than that of
MT19937, WELL1024a or WELL19937a. Yet, it performs significantly better on BigCrush. It is
a tribute to Marsaglia’s cleverness that just eight logical operations, one addition and one
multiplication by a constant can produce sequences of such high quality. xorgens generators
are similar with this respect, but use several more operations due to the additional shift
and to combination with a Weyl generator to hide linear artifacts [Brent 2007].
The t for which the multiplier has a good figure of merit has no detectable
effect on the quality of the generator. If our tests, we could not find any significant
difference between the behavior of generators based on M32 , M8 or M2 . It could be interesting to experiment with multipliers having very bad figures of merit, or more generally
with multipliers chosen using different heuristics.
Equidistribution is more useful as a design feature than as an evaluation feature.
While designing generators around equidistribution might be a good idea, as it leads in
general to good generators, evaluation by equidistribution is a more delicate matter because
of high-bits bias, instability issues, and failure to detect the generators having the best scores
in statistical suites.
TestU01 has significantly more resolution than Dieharder as a test suite. In
particular in the high-dimension case, TestU01 is able to provide useful information, whereas
Dieharder scores flatten down. However, TestU01 (as any other test suite with high-bits bias)
must always be applied to the reverse generator, too.
REFERENCES
Richard P. Brent. 1992. Uniform Random Number Generators for Supercomputers. In Supercomputing, the
competitive advantage: proceedings of the Fifth Australian Supercomputing Conference. 5ASC Organising Committee, Melbourne, 95–104.
Richard P. Brent. 2004. Note on Marsaglia’s Xorshift Random Number Generators. Journal of Statistical
Software 11, 5 (2004), 1–5.
Richard P. Brent. 2007. Some long-period random number generators using shifts and xors. ANZIAM J. 48
(2007), C188–C202.
Richard P. Brent. 2010. The myth of equidistribution for high-dimensional simulation. CoRR abs/1005.1320
(2010).
An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled
23
Robert G. Brown. 2013. Dieharder: A Random Number Test Suite (Version 3.31). (2013). Retrieved January
8, 2014 from http://www.phy.duke.edu/∼rgb/General/dieharder.php
Aaldert Compagner. 1991. The hierarchy of correlations in random binary sequences. Journal of Statistical
Physics 63, 5-6 (1991), 883–896.
Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, and Oren Patashnik. 1994. Concrete Mathematics (second ed.).
Addison–Wesley.
Shin Harase. 2011. An efficient lattice reduction method for F2 -linear pseudorandom number generators
using Mulders and Storjohann algorithm. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 2 (2011), 141–149.
Maurice G. Kendall. 1938. A New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika 30, 1/2 (1938), 81–93.
Maurice G. Kendall. 1945. The treatment of ties in ranking problems. Biometrika 33, 3 (1945), 239–251.
Pierre L’Ecuyer. 1999. Tables of linear congruential generators of different sizes and good lattice structure.
Math. Comput 68, 225 (1999), 249–260.
Pierre L’Ecuyer and Jacinthe Granger-Piché. 2003. Combined generators with components from different
families. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 62, 3 (2003), 395–404.
Pierre L’Ecuyer and François Panneton. 2005. Fast random number generators based on linear recurrences
modulo 2: overview and comparison. In Proceedings of the 37th Winter Simulation Conference. Winter
Simulation Conference, 110–119.
Pierre L’Ecuyer and Richard Simard. 2007. TestU01: A C library for empirical testing of random number
generators. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 33, 4, Article 22 (2007).
Robert H. Lewis. 2013. Fermat: A Computer Algebra System for Polynomial and Matrix Computation
(Version 5.1). (2013). Retrieved January 8, 2014 from http://home.bway.net/lewis/
Rudolf Lidl and Harald Niederreiter. 1994. Introduction to finite fields and their applications. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
George Marsaglia. 2003. Xorshift RNGs. Journal of Statistical Software 8, 14 (2003), 1–6.
Makoto Matsumoto and Takuji Nishimura. 1998. Mersenne Twister: A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed
Uniform Pseudo-Random Number Generator. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 8, 1 (1998), 3–30.
Harald Niederreiter. 1992. Random number generation and quasi-Monte Carlo methods. CBMS-NSF regional conference series in Appl. Math., Vol. 63. SIAM.
François Panneton. 2004. Construction d’ensembles de points basé sur une récurrence linéaire dans un
corps fini de caractéristique 2 pour la simulation Monte Carlo et l’intégration quasi-Monte Carlo.
Ph.D. Dissertation. Université de Montréal.
François Panneton and Pierre L’Ecuyer. 2005. On the xorshift random number generators. ACM Trans.
Model. Comput. Simul 15, 4 (2005), 346–361.
François Panneton, Pierre L’Ecuyer, and Makoto Matsumoto. 2006. Improved long-period generators based
on linear recurrences modulo 2. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 32, 1 (2006), 1–16.
William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, and Brian P. Flannery. 2007. Numerical recipes:
the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press.
Andrew Rukhin, Juan Soto, James Nechvatal, Miles Smid, Elaine Barker, Stefan Leigh, Mark Levenson,
Mark Vangel, David Banks, Alan Heckert, James Dray, and San Vo. 2001. A Statistical Test Suite For
Random and Pseudorandom Number Generators for Cryptographic Applications. National Institute for
Standards and Technology, pub-NIST:adr. NIST Special Publication 800-22, with revisions dated May
15, 2001.
Mutsuo Saito. 2013. MTToolBox (Version 0.2). (2013). Retrieved January 8, 2014 from http://msaito.
github.io/MTToolBox/en/
Mutsuo Saito and Makoto Matsumoto. 2008. SIMD-Oriented Fast Mersenne Twister: a 128-bit Pseudorandom Number Generator. In Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2006, Alexander Keller,
Stefan Heinrich, and Harald Niederreiter (Eds.). Springer, 607–622.
Mutsuo Saito and Makoto Matsumoto. 2014. XSadd (Version 1.1). (25 March 2014). http://www.math.sci.
hiroshima-u.ac.jp/∼m-mat/MT/XSADD/
Sebastiano Vigna. 2016. An experimental exploration of Marsaglia’s xorshift generators, scrambled. ACM
Trans. Math. Software 42, 4 (2016). Article No. 30.
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:1707.09652v1 [math.GR] 30 Jul 2017
Choosing elements from finite fields
Michael Vaughan-Lee
November 2012
1
Introduction
Graham Higman wrote two immensely important and influential papers on
enumerating p-groups in the late 1950s. The papers were entitled Enumerating p-groups I and II, and were published in the Proceedings of the London
Mathematical Society in 1960 (see [1] and [2]). In these two papers Higman
proved that for any given n, the function f (pn ) enumerating the number of
p-groups of order pn is bounded by a polynomial in p, and he formulated
his famous PORC conjecture concerning the form of the function f (pn ). He
conjectured that for each n there is an integer N (depending on n) such that
for p in a fixed residue class modulo N the function f (pn ) is a polynomial in
p. For example, for p ≥ 5 the number of groups of order p6 is
3p2 + 39p + 344 + 24 gcd(p − 1, 3) + 11 gcd(p − 1, 4) + 2 gcd(p − 1, 5).
(See [3].) So for p ≥ 5, f (p6 ) is one of 8 polynomials in p, with the choice
of polynomial depending on the residue class of p modulo 60. The number
of groups of order p6 is Polynomial On Residue Classes. As evidence in
support of his PORC conjecture Higman proved that, for any given n, the
function enumerating the number of p-class 2 groups of order pn is a PORC
function of p. He obtained this result as a corollary to a very general theorem about vector spaces acted on by the general linear group. As another
corollary to this general theorem, he also proved that for any given n the
function enumerating the number of algebras of dimension n over the field of
q elements is a PORC function of q. A key step in Higman’s proof of these
results is Theorem 2.2.2 from [2].
Theorem 1 (Higman [2]) The number of ways of choosing a finite number of elements from Fqn subject to a finite number of monomial equations
and inequalities between them and their conjugates over Fq , considered as a
function of q, is PORC.
1
The statement of this theorem probably requires some explanation! Here
we are choosing elements x1 , x2 , . . . , xk (say) from the finite field Fqn (where
q is a prime power) subject to a finite set of equations and non-equations of
the form
xn1 1 xn2 2 . . . xnk k = 1
and
xn1 1 xn2 2 . . . xnk k 6= 1,
where n1 , n2 , . . . , nk are integer polynomials in the Frobenius automorphism
x 7→ xq of Fqn . Higman calls these equations and non-equations monomial.
For example, suppose we want to choose x1 , x2 ∈ Fqn such that x1 is the root
of an irreducible quadratic over Fq and such that x22 is the product of the
roots of this quadratic. Then we require that x1 and x2 satisfy
2 −1
x1q
−2
= 1, x1q−1 6= 1, xq+1
1 x2 = 1.
(1)
2
The equation x1q −1 = 1 guarantees that x1 is the root of a quadratic over
Fq , and the non-equation x1q−1 6= 1 guarantees that x1 ∈
/ Fq so that the
quadratic is irreducible. The other root of the quadratic is then xq1 , so the
last equation guarantees that x22 is the product
of the roots.
To make sure
q n −1
q n −1
= 1, x2
= 1. Higman’s
that x1 , x2 ∈ Fqn , we also require that x1
theorem is that the function enumerating the number of solutions to (1) in
Fqn is a PORC function of q.
In this note we give very precise information about the exact form of the
PORC functions needed to enumerate the number of solutions to a set of
monomial equations.
Higman’s proof of his Theorem 2.2.2 involves five pages of homological
algebra. A shorter more elementary proof can be found in [4]. The proof
in [4] shows that one way to calculate the number of solutions to a set of
monomial equations is to write the equations as the rows of a matrix. So we
represent the equations
2 −1
x1q
n −1
q
−2
= 1, xq+1
1 x2 = 1, x1
n −1
= 1, xq2
=1
by the matrix
q2 − 1
0
q+1
−2
.
n
q −1
0
0
qn − 1
For any given value of q the matrix becomes an integer matrix, and it is
shown in [4] that the number of solutions is the product of the elementary
2
divisors in the Smith normal form of this integer matrix. To obtain the
number of solutions to (1) in Fqn we subtract the number of solutions to the
equations
n
q n −1
−2
x1q−1 = 1, xq+1
= 1, xq2 −1 = 1.
1 x2 = 1, x1
The number of solutions to these equations is just the product of the elementary divisors in the Smith normal form of the matrix
q−1
0
q+1
−2
.
n
q −1
0
0
qn − 1
(In [4] q is assumed to be prime, but the proof is still valid when q is a prime
power.)
Matrices used in this way to represent a set of monomial equations have
entries which are integer polynomials in q. The columns correspond to the
unknowns we are solving for, and since there will always be rows (q n −
1, 0, 0, . . . , 0), (0, q n − 1, 0, . . . , 0), . . . , (0, . . . , 0, q n − 1) corresponding to the
requirement that the unknowns are elements in Fqn , it follows that the rank
of one of these matrices is the number of columns. So the product of the
elementary divisors in the Smith normal form of one of these matrices is
the greatest common divisor of the k × k minors, where k is the number of
columns. These k × k minors are integer polynomials in q, and it is proved
in [4] that the greatest common divisor of a set of integer polynomials in q
is a PORC function of q. There is some ambiguity about what “the greatest
common divisor of a set of polynomials” means here. Suppose we have some
integer polynomials f1 (q), f2 (q), . . . , fs (q). For any given value of q these
polynomials evaluate to integers, and by “greatest common divisor of the
polynomials” we actually mean “greatest common divisor of the values of
the polynomials at q”. It is this integer valued function of q which we claim
is PORC, and it turns out that we can be quite precise about the form that
this PORC function takes.
Theorem 2 The greatest common divisor of a set of integer polynomials in
q can be expressed in the form df where f is an integer polynomial in q and
where
r
X
d=α+
αi gcd(q − ni , mi )
i=1
for some rational numbers α, α1 , α2 , . . . , αr , some integers m1 , m2 , . . . , mr
with mi > 1 for all i, and some integers n1 , n2 , . . . , nr with 0 < ni < mi for
all i.
3
Corollary 3 The number of ways of choosing a finite number of elements
from Fqn subject to a finite number of monomial equations and inequalities
between them and their conjugates over Fq can be expressed as a linear combination of terms of the form df , where f and d are as described in Theorem
2.
2
Choosing field elements
To make this note self contained, we give a proof here that we can use a
matrix to represent a set of monomial equations over a finite field, and that
the number of solutions to the equations is the product of the elementary
divisors in the Smith normal form of the matrix.
So suppose we have a set of monomial equations in unknowns x1 , x2 , . . . , xk ,
and suppose that we want to find the number of solutions to these equations
in the field Fqn . We represent the equations in a matrix A with k columns,
with a row (n1 , n2 , . . . , nk ) for each monomial equation xn1 1 xn2 2 . . . xnk k = 1.
We also add in rows
(q n − 1, 0, 0, . . . , 0), (0, q n − 1, 0, . . . , 0), . . . , (0, 0, . . . , 0, q n − 1)
corresponding to the requirement that x1 , x2 , . . . , xk ∈ Fqn . Note that the
entries in the matrix A are integer polynomials in q. We now take a particular
value for q so that the matrix becomes a matrix with integer entries.
Let ω be a primitive element in Fqn , and write xi = ω mi for i = 1, 2, . . . , k ,
taking the exponents mi as elements in Zqn −1 . Then a row (β1 , β2 , . . . , βk )
in the matrix A corresponds to a relation β1 m1 + β2 m2 + . . . + βk mk = 0
which we require the exponents mi to satisfy. The matrix A can be reduced
to Smith normal form over Z by elementary row and column operations. As
we apply these operations, the relations encoded in the matrix change. But
we show that at each step the number of solutions to the relations stays
constant.
This is clear for elementary row operations, since an elementary row
operation replaces the relations by an equivalent set of relations. So we
need to consider the effect of elementary column operations. We can consider the k-tuples (m1 , m2 , . . . , mk ) as elements in the additive group G =
Zqn −1 × Zqn −1 × . . . × Zqn −1 . Let A be one of these relation matrices, and
let B be the matrix obtained from A after applying an elementary column
operation. For each such operation we define an automorphism σ of G with
the property that g ∈ G satisfies the relations given by the rows of A if and
only if gσ satisfies the relations given by the rows of B. This shows that
4
the number of elements in G satisfying the relations given by A is the same
as the number of elements in G satisfying the relations given by B. If the
elementary column operation swaps two columns of A then we let σ be the automorphism which swaps the corresponding entries in (m1 , m2 , . . . , mk ), and
if the elementary column operation multiplies a column by −1 we let σ be the
automorphism which multiplies the corresponding entry in (m1 , m2 , . . . , mk )
by −1. Finally, if the elementary column operation subtracts α times column
j from column i, then we let σ be the automorphism which leaves all the entries in (m1 , m2 , . . . , mk ) fixed except for the j-th entry, which it replaces by
mj + αmi .
The argument above shows that the number of g ∈ G satisfying the
original set of relations given by the rows of A is the same as the number
of g ∈ G satisfying the relations given by the Smith normal form A. If
the elementary divisors in the Smith normal form are d1 , d2 , . . . , dk , then
(m1 , m2 , . . . , mk ) is a solution to these equations if and only if
d1 m1 = d2 m2 = . . . = dk mk = 0.
Provided we can show that di |q n − 1 for all i, this shows that the number of
solutions is d1 d2 . . . dk , as claimed.
If A is one of these relation matrices with k columns, then the rows of
A are elements in the free Z-module F = Zk . We let R(A) denote the Zsubmodule of F generated by the rows of A. Our claim that di |q n − 1 for all
i amounts to the claim that (q n − 1)F ≤ R(S), where S is the Smith normal
form of our initial relation matrix. The Smith normal form is obtained from
the initial matrix by a sequence of elementary row and column operations,
and we show that (q n − 1)F ≤ R(B) for all the matrices B generated in this
sequence.
Let A be the starting matrix. Then it contains rows
(q n − 1, 0, 0, . . . , 0), (0, q n − 1, 0, . . . , 0), . . . , (0, 0, . . . , 0, q n − 1),
so it is clear that (q n −1)F ≤ R(A). Suppose that at some intermediate stage
in the reduction of A to Smith normal form we have two matrices B and C,
where C is obtained from B by an elementary row operation or an elementary
column operation. We assume by induction that (q n − 1)F ≤ R(B), and
we show that this implies that (q n − 1)F ≤ R(C). This is clear if C is
obtained from B by an elementary row operation, since then R(B) = R(C).
So consider the case when C is obtained from B by an elementary column
operation. This column operation corresponds to an automorphism σ of F ,
and if r is a row of B then the corresponding row of C is rσ. So R(C) =
5
R(B)σ, and the fact that (q n −1)F is a characteristic submodule of F implies
that (q n − 1)F ≤ R(C).
This completes the proof that the number of solutions to the relations
given by the rows of the matrix is equal to the product of the elementary
divisors in the Smith normal form. As mentioned in the introduction, the
product of the elementary divisors in the Smith normal form of an integer
matrix with k columns and rank k is the greatest common divisor of the k ×k
minors. In the situation we are concerned with, these minors are integer
polynomials in q. So the number of solutions to our monomial equations
is the greatest common divisor of a set of integer polynomials in q. More
precisely, we have a set of integer polynomials in q, and for any given value of
q the number of solutions to our monomial equations is the greatest common
divisor over Z of the values of these polynomials at q.
3
Proof of Theorem 2
Let f1 (q), f2 (q), . . . , fs (q) be a set of integer polynomials in q. We want to
compute the function whose value at q is the greatest common divisor of the
integers f1 (q), f2 (q), . . . , fs (q). In this section there is no requirement that
q be a prime power, and to make this clear we define a function h : Z → Z
by setting
h(x) = gcd(f1 (x), f2 (x), . . . , fs (x)) for x ∈ Z.
It is the function h we want to compute. As mentioned above, there is
some ambiguity about what we mean by “the greatest common divisor of
f1 (x), f2 (x), . . . , fs (x)”. We now exploit this ambiguity, and treat x as an
indeterminate and treat f1 (x), f2 (x), . . . , fs (x) as elements of the Euclidean
domain Q[x].
We can use the Euclidean algorithm to compute the greatest common
divisor f (x) of f1 (x), f2 (x), . . . , fs (x) in Q[x] and we can take f (x) to be
a primitive polynomial in Z[x]. We then obtain polynomials g1 , g2 , . . . , gs ∈
Q[x] such that
f1 g1 + f2 g2 + . . . + fs gs = f.
Let m be the least common multiple of the denominators of the coefficients
in g1 , g2 , . . . , gs . Then for any given value of x in Z, the greatest common
divisor of the integers f1 (x), f2 (x), . . . , fs (x) is df (x) for some d dividing
m. Furthermore, as a function of x, the value of d at x depends only on the
6
residue class of x modulo m. We show that we can express d(x) in the form
α+
r
X
αi gcd(x − ni , mi )
i=1
described in the statement of Theorem 2. Furthermore we show that we can
take the integers mi to be of the form dmi for some square free divisors di of
m with di < m. This shows that h(x) = d(x)f (x) has the form described in
Theorem 2.
If m = 1 then d = 1 for all x, and we are done. So suppose that m > 1
and let S be the set of prime factors of m. For each subset T ⊂ S let
Y
dT =
p,
p∈T
and consider the function k : Z → Z defined by
X
m
k(x) =
(−1)|T | gcd(x, ).
dT
T ⊂S
Clearly the value of k at any given value of x depends only on the residue
class of x modulo m. First consider the case when x = m.
X
Y
m
1
k(m) =
(−1)|T |
= m (1 − ) 6= 0.
dT
p
T ⊂S
p∈S
Next suppose that 1 ≤ x < m. Then there is at least one p ∈ S with the
property that the power of p dividing x is less than the power of p dividing
m. Pick one such p and let U = S\{p}. Then
X
m
m
|T |
gcd(x, ) − gcd(x,
k(x) =
(−1)
) = 0,
dT
pdT
T ⊂U
since gcd(x, dmT ) = gcd(x, pdmT ) for all T ⊂ U. So if we let c = k(m) then
1
k(x) takes values 0, 0, . . . , 0, 1 as x takes values 1, 2, . . . , m modulo m. It
c
follows that if 0 < a < m then 1c k(x − a) takes values 0, . . . , 0, 1, 0, . . . , 0 as
x takes values 1, 2, . . . , m modulo m (with the 1 in the ath place). So we
can express d(x) as a rational linear combination of the functions k(x − a)
for 0 ≤ a < m. This implies that we can express d(x) as a rational linear
combination of functions of the form gcd(x − ni , mi ) where mi = dmT for some
7
T ⊂ S. If mi = 1 then we can replace gcd(x − ni , mi ) by the constant 1.
Also, we can assume 0 ≤ ni < mi . Finally, using the fact that
m
i −1
X
gcd(x − a, mi )
a=0
is a constant function, we can assume that 0 < ni < mi , provided we add
a constant term into our expression for d(x). This completes the proof of
Theorem 2. Note that the proof shows that we can assume that the denominators of the rational coefficients which appear in the expression for d(x)
divide the constant k(m).
References
[1] G. Higman, Enumerating p-groups. I: Inequalities, Proc. London Math.
Soc. (3) 10 (1960), 24–30.
[2] G. Higman, Enumerating p-groups. II: Problems whose solution is PORC,
Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 10 (1960), 566–582.
[3] M.F. Newman, E.A. O’Brien, and M.R. Vaughan-Lee, Groups and nilpotent Lie rings whose order is the sixth power of a prime, J. Algebra 278
(2004), 383–401.
[4] Michael Vaughan-Lee, On Graham Higman’s famous PORC paper, Internat. J. Group Theory 1 (2012), 65–79.
8
| 4math.GR
|
Deep Layer Aggregation
Fisher Yu
Dequan Wang
Evan Shelhamer
Trevor Darrell
UC Berkeley
arXiv:1707.06484v2 [cs.CV] 4 Jan 2018
Abstract
Visual recognition requires rich representations that span
levels from low to high, scales from small to large, and
resolutions from fine to coarse. Even with the depth of features in a convolutional network, a layer in isolation is not
enough: compounding and aggregating these representations improves inference of what and where. Architectural
efforts are exploring many dimensions for network backbones, designing deeper or wider architectures, but how to
best aggregate layers and blocks across a network deserves
further attention. Although skip connections have been incorporated to combine layers, these connections have been
“shallow” themselves, and only fuse by simple, one-step operations. We augment standard architectures with deeper
aggregation to better fuse information across layers. Our
deep layer aggregation structures iteratively and hierarchically merge the feature hierarchy to make networks with
better accuracy and fewer parameters. Experiments across
architectures and tasks show that deep layer aggregation
improves recognition and resolution compared to existing
branching and merging schemes.
Dense Connections
Feature Pyramids
+
Deep Layer Aggregation
Figure 1: Deep layer aggregation unifies semantic and spatial fusion to better capture what and where. Our aggregation
architectures encompass and extend densely connected networks and feature pyramid networks with hierarchical and
iterative skip connections that deepen the representation and
refine resolution.
riers, different blocks or modules have been incorporated
to balance and temper these quantities, such as bottlenecks
for dimensionality reduction [29, 39, 17] or residual, gated,
and concatenative connections for feature and gradient propagation [17, 38, 19]. Networks designed according to these
schemes have 100+ and even 1000+ layers.
Nevertheless, further exploration is needed on how to
connect these layers and modules. Layered networks from
LeNet [26] through AlexNet [23] to ResNet [17] stack layers and modules in sequence. Layerwise accuracy comparisons [11, 48, 35], transferability analysis [44], and representation visualization [48, 46] show that deeper layers extract
more semantic and more global features, but these signs do
not prove that the last layer is the ultimate representation
for any task. In fact, skip connections have proven effective
for classification and regression [19, 4] and more structured
tasks [15, 35, 30]. Aggregation, like depth and width, is a
critical dimension of architecture.
In this work, we investigate how to aggregate layers to
better fuse semantic and spatial information for recognition
and localization. Extending the “shallow” skip connections
of current approaches, our aggregation architectures incor-
1. Introduction
Representation learning and transfer learning now permeate computer vision as engines of recognition. The simple fundamentals of compositionality and differentiability
give rise to an astonishing variety of deep architectures
[23, 39, 37, 16, 47]. The rise of convolutional networks
as the backbone of many visual tasks, ready for different
purposes with the right task extensions and data [14, 35, 42],
has made architecture search a central driver in sustaining
progress. The ever-increasing size and scope of networks
now directs effort into devising design patterns of modules
and connectivity patterns that can be assembled systematically. This has yielded networks that are deeper and wider,
but what about more closely connected?
More nonlinearity, greater capacity, and larger receptive
fields generally improve accuracy but can be problematic
for optimization and computation. To overcome these bar1
porate more depth and sharing. We introduce two structures
for deep layer aggregation (DLA): iterative deep aggregation (IDA) and hierarchical deep aggregation (HDA). These
structures are expressed through an architectural framework,
independent of the choice of backbone, for compatibility
with current and future networks. IDA focuses on fusing
resolutions and scales while HDA focuses on merging features from all modules and channels. IDA follows the base
hierarchy to refine resolution and aggregate scale stage-bystage. HDA assembles its own hierarchy of tree-structured
connections that cross and merge stages to aggregate different levels of representation. Our schemes can be combined
to compound improvements.
Our experiments evaluate deep layer aggregation across
standard architectures and tasks to extend ResNet [16]
and ResNeXt [41] for large-scale image classification, finegrained recognition, semantic segmentation, and boundary
detection. Our results show improvements in performance,
parameter count, and memory usage over baseline ResNet,
ResNeXT, and DenseNet architectures. DLA achieve stateof-the-art results among compact models for classification.
Without further architecting, the same networks obtain stateof-the-art results on several fine-grained recognition benchmarks. Recast for structured output by standard techniques,
DLA achieves best-in-class accuracy on semantic segmentation of Cityscapes [8] and state-of-the-art boundary detection
on PASCAL Boundaries [32]. Deep layer aggregation is a
general and effective extension to deep visual architectures.
2. Related Work
We review architectures for visual recognition, highlight
key architectures for the aggregation of hierarchical features
and pyramidal scales, and connect these to our focus on deep
aggregation across depths, scales, and resolutions.
The accuracy of AlexNet [23] for image classification
on ILSVRC [34] signalled the importance of architecture
for visual recognition. Deep learning diffused across vision by establishing that networks could serve as backbones,
which broadcast improvements not once but with every better architecture, through transfer learning [11, 48] and metaalgorithms for object detection [14] and semantic segmentation [35] that take the base architecture as an argument. In
this way GoogLeNet [39] and VGG [39] improved accuracy
on a variety of visual problems. Their patterned components
prefigured a more systematic approach to architecture.
Systematic design has delivered deeper and wider networks such as residual networks (ResNets) [16] and highway networks [38] for depth and ResNeXT [41] and FractalNet [25] for width. While these architectures all contribute
their own structural ideas, they incorporated bottlenecks and
shortened paths inspired by earlier techniques. Network-innetwork [29] demonstrated channel mixing as a technique
to fuse features, control dimensionality, and go deeper. The
companion and auxiliary losses of deeply-supervised networks [27] and GoogLeNet [39] showed that it helps to keep
learned layers and losses close. For the most part these architectures derive from innovations in connectivity: skipping,
gating, branching, and aggregating.
Our aggregation architectures are most closely related to
leading approaches for fusing feature hierarchies. The key
axes of fusion are semantic and spatial. Semantic fusion, or
aggregating across channels and depths, improves inference
of what. Spatial fusion, or aggregating across resolutions and
scales, improves inference of where. Deep layer aggregation
can be seen as the union of both forms of fusion.
Densely connected networks (DenseNets) [19] are the
dominant family of architectures for semantic fusion, designed to better propagate features and losses through skip
connections that concatenate all the layers in stages. Our
hierarchical deep aggregation shares the same insight on the
importance of short paths and re-use, and extends skip connections with trees that cross stages and deeper fusion than
concatenation. Densely connected and deeply aggregated
networks achieve more accuracy as well as better parameter
and memory efficiency.
Feature pyramid networks (FPNs) [30] are the dominant
family of architectures for spatial fusion, designed to equalize resolution and standardize semantics across the levels of
a pyramidal feature hierarchy through top-down and lateral
connections. Our iterative deep aggregation likewise raises
resolution, but further deepens the representation by nonlinear and progressive fusion. FPN connections are linear
and earlier levels are not aggregated more to counter their
relative semantic weakness. Pyramidal and deeply aggregated networks are better able to resolve what and where for
structured output tasks.
3. Deep Layer Aggregation
We define aggregation as the combination of different
layers throughout a network. In this work we focus on a
family of architectures for the effective aggregation of depths,
resolutions, and scales. We call a group of aggregations deep
if it is compositional, nonlinear, and the earliest aggregated
layer passes through multiple aggregations.
As networks can contain many layers and connections,
modular design helps counter complexity by grouping and
repetition. Layers are grouped into blocks, which are then
grouped into stages by their feature resolution. We are concerned with aggregating the blocks and stages.
3.1. Iterative Deep Aggregation
Iterative deep aggregation follows the iterated stacking
of the backbone architecture. We divide the stacked blocks
of the network into stages according to feature resolution.
Deeper stages are more semantic but spatially coarser. Skip
connections from shallower to deeper stages merge scales
Block
OUT
Existing
Proposed
Stage
Aggregation Node
OUT
IN
OUT
IN
(a) No aggregation
IN
(b) Shallow aggregation
OUT
IN
IN
(d) Tree-structured aggregation
(c) Iterative deep aggregation
OUT
OUT
IN
(e) Reentrant aggregation
(f) Hierarchical deep aggregation
Figure 2: Different approaches to aggregation. (a) composes blocks without aggregation as is the default for classification
and regression networks. (b) combines parts of the network with skip connections, as is commonly used for tasks like
segmentation and detection, but does so only shallowly by merging earlier parts in a single step each. We propose two deep
aggregation architectures: (c) aggregates iteratively by reordering the skip connections of (b) such that the shallowest parts
are aggregated the most for further processing and (d) aggregates hierarchically through a tree structure of blocks to better
span the feature hierarchy of the network across different depths. (e) and (f) are refinements of (d) that deepen aggregation by
routing intermediate aggregations back into the network and improve efficiency by merging successive aggregations at the
same depth. Our experiments show the advantages of (c) and (f) for recognition and resolution.
and resolutions. However, the skips in existing work, e.g.
FCN [35], U-Net [33], and FPN [30], are linear and aggregate the shallowest layers the least, as shown in Figure 2(b).
We propose to instead progressively aggregate and deepen
the representation with IDA. Aggregation begins at the shallowest, smallest scale and then iteratively merges deeper,
larger scales. In this way shallow features are refined as
they are propagated through different stages of aggregation.
Figure 2(c) shows the structure of IDA.
The iterative deep aggregation function I for a series
of layers x1 , ..., xn with increasingly deeper and semantic
information is formulated as
(
x1
if n = 1
I(x1 , ..., xn ) =
(1)
I(N (x1 , x2 ), ..., xn ) otherwise,
where N is the aggregation node.
3.2. Hierarchical Deep Aggregation
Hierarchical deep aggregation merges blocks and stages
in a tree to preserve and combine feature channels. With
HDA shallower and deeper layers are combined to learn
richer combinations that span more of the feature hierarchy.
While IDA effectively combines stages, it is insufficient
for fusing the many blocks of a network, as it is still only
sequential. The deep, branching structure of hierarchical
aggregation is shown in Figure 2(d).
Having established the general structure of HDA we can
improve its depth and efficiency. Rather than only routing
intermediate aggregations further up the tree, we instead feed
the output of an aggregation node back into the backbone as
the input to the next sub-tree, as shown in Figure 2(e). This
propagates the aggregation of all previous blocks instead of
the preceding block alone to better preserve features. For
efficiency, we merge aggregation nodes of the same depth
(combining the parent and left child), as shown in Figure 2(f).
The hierarchical deep aggregation function Tn , with depth
n, is formulated as
n
n
Tn (x) = N (Rn−1
(x), Rn−2
(x), ...,
R1n (x), Ln1 (x), Ln2 (x)),
(2)
where N is the aggregation node. R and L are defined as
Ln2 (x) = B(Ln1 (x)), Ln1 (x) = B(R1n (x)),
(
Tm (x)
if m = n − 1
n
Rm (x) =
n
Tm (Rm+1
(x)) otherwise,
where B represents a convolutional block.
3.3. Architectural Elements
Aggregation Nodes The main function of an aggregation
node is to combine and compress their inputs. The nodes
learn to select and project important information to maintain
Hierarchical Deep Aggregation
Iterative Deep Aggregation
Aggregation Node
Downsample 2x
Conv Block
OUT
IN
Figure 3: Deep layer aggregation learns to better extract the full spectrum of semantic and spatial information from a network.
Iterative connections join neighboring stages to progressively deepen and spatially refine the representation. Hierarchical
connections cross stages with trees that span the spectrum of layers to better propagate features and gradients.
the same dimension at their output as a single input. In
our architectures IDA nodes are always binary, while HDA
nodes have a variable number of arguments depending on
the depth of the tree.
Although an aggregation node can be based on any block
or layer, for simplicity and efficiency we choose a single convolution followed by batch normalization and a nonlinearity.
This avoids overhead for aggregation structures. In image
classification networks, all the nodes use 1×1 convolution.
In semantic segmentation, we add a further level of iterative
deep aggregation to interpolate features, and in this case use
3×3 convolution.
As residual connections are important for assembling very
deep networks, we can also include residual connections in
our aggregation nodes. However, it is not immediately clear
that they are necessary for aggregation. With HDA, the
shortest path from any block to the root is at most the depth
of the hierarchy, so diminishing or exploding gradients may
not appear along the aggregation paths. In our experiments,
we find that residual connection in node can help HDA when
the deepest hierarchy has 4 levels or more, while it may hurt
for networks with smaller hierarchy. Our base aggregation,
i.e. N in Equation 1 and 2, is defined by:
different backbones. Our architectures make no requirements
of the internal structure of the blocks and stages.
The networks we instantiate in our experiments make
use of three types of residual blocks [17, 41]. Basic blocks
combine stacked convolutions with an identity skip connection. Bottleneck blocks regularize the convolutional stack by
reducing dimensionality through a 1×1 convolution. Split
blocks diversify features by grouping channels into a number
of separate paths (called the cardinality of the split). In this
work, we reduce the ratio between the number of output and
intermediate channels by half for both bottleneck and split
blocks, and the cardinality of our split blocks is 32. Refer to
the cited papers for the exact details of these blocks.
4. Applications
We now design networks with deep layer aggregation
for visual recognition tasks. To study the contribution of
the aggregated representation, we focus on linear prediction
without further machinery. Our results do without ensembles for recognition and context modeling or dilation for
resolution. Aggregation of semantic and spatial information
matters for classification and dense prediction alike.
4.1. Classification Networks
N (x1 , ..., xn ) = σ(BatchNorm(
X
Wi xi + b)),
(3)
i
where σ is the non-linear activation, and wi and b are the
weights in the convolution. If residual connections are added,
the equation becomes
N (x1 , ..., xn ) = σ(BatchNorm(
X
Wi xi + b) + xn ).
(4)
i
Note that the order of arguments for N does matter and
should follow Equation 2.
Blocks and Stages Deep layer aggregation is a general
architecture family in the sense that it is compatible with
Our classification networks augment ResNet and
ResNeXT with IDA and HDA. These are staged networks,
which group blocks by spatial resolution, with residual connections within each block. The end of every stage halves
resolution, giving six stages in total, with the first stage
maintaining the input resolution while the last stage is 32×
downsampled. The final feature maps are collapsed by global
average pooling then linearly scored. The classification is
predicted as the softmax over the scores.
We connect across stages with IDA and within and across
stages by HDA. These types of aggregation are easily combined by sharing aggregation nodes. In this case, we only
need to change the root node at each hierarchy by combin-
Iterative Deep Aggregation
2s
OUT
Aggregation Node
Upsample 2x
2s
4s
4s
8s
Stage
2s
IN
2s
2s
4s
8s
16s
4s
8s
16s
32s
Figure 4: Interpolation by iterative deep aggregation. Stages
are fused from shallow to deep to make a progressively
deeper and higher resolution decoder.
ing Equation 1 and 2. Our stages are downsampled by max
pooling with size 2 and stride 2.
The earliest stages have their own structure. As in
DRN [46], we replace max pooling in stages 1–2 with strided
convolution. The stage 1 is composed of a 7×7 convolution
followed by a basic block. The stage 2 is only a basic block.
For all other stages, we make use of combined IDA and HDA
on the backbone blocks and stages.
For a direct comparison of layers and parameters in different networks, we build networks with a comparable number
of layers as ResNet-34, ResNet-50 and ResNet-101. (The
exact depth varies as to keep our novel hierarchical structure
intact.) To further illustrate the efficiency of DLA for condensing the representation, we make compact networks with
fewer parameters. Table 1 lists our networks and Figure 3
shows a DLA architecture with HDA and IDA.
4.2. Dense Prediction Networks
Semantic segmentation, contour detection, and other
image-to-image tasks can exploit the aggregation to fuse
local and global information. The conversion from classification DLA to fully convolutional DLA is simple and no
different than for other architectures. We make use of interpolation and a further augmentation with IDA to reach the
necessary output resolution for a task.
IDA for interpolation increases both depth and resolution
by projection and upsampling as in Figure 4. All the projection and upsampling parameters are learned jointly during
the optimization of the network. The upsampling steps are
initialized to bilinear interpolation and can then be learned as
in [35]. We first project the outputs of stages 3–6 to 32 channels and then interpolate the stages to the same resolution as
stage 2. Finally, we iteratively aggregate these stages to learn
a deep fusion of low and high level features. While having
the same purpose as FCN skip connections [35], hypercolumn features [15], and FPN top-down connections [30], our
aggregation differs in approach by going from shallow-todeep to further refine features. Note that we use IDA twice
in this case: once to connect stages in the backbone network
and again to recover resolution.
5. Results
We evaluate our deep layer aggregation networks on a variety of tasks: image classification on ILSVRC, several kinds
of fine-grained recognition, and dense prediction for semantic segmentation and contour detection. After establishing
our classification architecture, we transfer these networks to
the other tasks with little to no modification. DLA improves
on or rivals the results of special-purpose networks.
5.1. ImageNet Classification
We first train our networks on the ImageNet 2012 training set [34]. Similar to ResNet [16], training is performed
by SGD for 120 epochs with momentum 0.9, weight decay
10−4 and batch size 256. We start the training with learning rate 0.1, which is reduced by 10 every 30 epochs. We
use scale and aspect ratio augmentation [41], but not color
perturbation. For fair comparison, we also train the ResNet
models with the same training procedure. This leads to slight
improvements over the original results.
We evaluate the performance of trained models on the
ImageNet 2012 validation set. The images are resized so
that the shorter side has 256 pixels. Then central 224×224
crops are extracted from the images and fed into networks to
measure prediction accuracy.
DLA vs. ResNet compares DLA networks to ResNets
with similar numbers of layers and the same convolutional
blocks as shown in Figure 5. We find that DLA networks can
achieve better performance with fewer parameters. DLA-34
and ResNet-34 both use basic blocks, but DLA-34 has about
30% fewer parameters and ∼ 1 point of improvement in
top-1 error rate. We usually expect diminishing returns of
performance of deeper networks. However, our results show
that compared to ResNet-50 and ResNet-101, DLA networks
can still outperform the baselines significantly with fewer
parameters.
DLA vs. ResNeXt shows that DLA is flexible enough to
use different convolutional blocks and still have advantage in
accuracy and parameter efficiency as shown in Figure 5. Our
models based on the split blocks have much fewer parameters
but they still have similar performance with ResNeXt models.
For example, DLA-X-102 has nearly the half number of
parameters compared to ResNeXt-101, but the error rate
difference is only 0.2%.
DLA vs. DenseNet compares DLA with the dominant architecture for semantic fusion and feature re-use. DenseNets
are composed of dense blocks that aggregate all of their
layers by concatenation and transition blocks that reduce
dimensionality for tractability. While these networks can
Name
DLA-34
DLA-48-C
DLA-60
DLA-102
DLA-169
DLA-X-48-C
DLA-X-60-C
DLA-X-60
DLA-X-102
Block
Basic
Bottleneck
Bottleneck
Bottleneck
Bottleneck
Split
Split
Split
Split
Stage 1
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
Stage 2
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
Stage 3
1-64
1-64
1-128
1-128
2-128
1-64
1-64
1-128
1-128
Stage 4
2-128
2-64
2-256
3-256
3-256
2-64
2-64
2-256
3-256
Stage 5
2-256
2-128
3-512
4-512
5-512
2-128
3-128
3-512
4-512
Stage 6
1-512
1-256
1-1024
1-1024
1-1024
1-256
1-256
1-1024
1-1024
Table 1: Deep layer aggregation networks for classification. Stages 1 and 2 show the number of channels n while further stages
show d-n where d is the aggregation depth. Models marked with “-C” are compact and only have ∼1 million parameters.
aggressively reduce depth and parameter count by feature reuse, concatenation is a memory-intensive fusion operation.
DLA achieves higher accuracy with lower memory usage
because the aggregation node fan-in size is log of the total
number of convolutional blocks in HDA.
Compact models have received a lot of attention due to
the limited capabilities of consumer hardware for running
convolutional networks. We design parameter constrained
DLA networks to study how efficiently DLA can aggregate
and re-use features. We compare to SqueezeNet [20], which
shares a block design similar to our own. Table 2 shows
that DLA is more accurate with the same number of parameters. Furthermore DLA is more computationally efficient by
operation count.
SqueezNet-A
SqueezNet-B
DLA-46-C
DLA-46-C
DLA-X-60-C
Top-1
42.5
39.6
36.8
34.0
32.5
Top-5
19.7
17.5
15.0
13.7
12.0
Params
1.2M
1.2M
1.3M
1.1M
1.3M
FMAs
1.70B
0.72B
0.58B
0.53B
0.59B
Table 2: Comparison with compact models. DLA is more
accurate at the same number of parameters while inference
takes fewer operations (counted by fused multiply-adds).
5.2. Fine-grained Recognition
We use the same training procedure for all of fine-grained
experiments. The training is performed by SGD with a minibatch size of 64, while the learning rate starts from 0.01 and
is then divided by 10 every 50 epochs, for 110 epochs in
total. The other hyperparameters are fixed to their settings for
ImageNet classification. In order to mitigate over-fitting, we
carry out the following data augmentation: Inception-style
Bird
Car
Plane
Food
ILSVRC
#Class
200
196
102
101
1000
#Train (per class)
5994 (30)
8144 (42)
6667 (67)
75750 (750)
1,281,167 (1281)
#Test (per class)
5794 (29)
8041 (41)
3333 (33)
25250 (250)
100,000 (100)
Table 3: Statistics for fine-grained recognition datasets. Compared to generic, large-scale classification, these tasks contain more specific classes with fewer training instances.
scale and aspect ratio variation [39], AlexNet-style PCA
color noise[23], and the photometric distortions of [18].
We evaluate our models on various fine-grained recognition datasets: Bird (CUB) [40], Car [22], Plane [31], and
Food [5]. The statistics of these datasets can be found in
Table 3, while results are shown in Figure 6. For fair comparison, we follow the experimental setup of [9]: we randomly crop 224×224 in resized 256×256 images for [5] and
448×448 in resized 512×512 for the rest of datasets, while
keeping 224×224 input size for original VGGNet.
Our results improve or rival the state-of-the-art without further annotations or specific modules for fine-grained
recognition. In particular, we establish new state-of-the-arts
results on Car, Plane, and Food datasets. Furthermore, our
models are competitive while having only several million
parameters. However, our results are not better than stateof-the-art on Birds, although note that this dataset has fewer
instances per class so further regularization might help.
5.3. Semantic Segmentation
We report experiments for urban scene understanding
on CamVid [6] and Cityscapes [8]. Cityscapes is a largerscale, more challenging dataset for comparison with other
methods while CamVid is more convenient for examining
ResNet
ResNeXt
DenseNet
DLA
DLA-X
28
Top-1 Error Rate
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
20
40
60
# Params (Million)
80
2
4
6
8
10
12
# Multi-Add (Billion)
14
16
Figure 5: Evaluation of DLA on ILSVRC. DLA/DLA-X have ResNet/ResNeXT backbones respectively. DLA achieves the
highest accuracies with fewer parameters and fewer computation.
Bird
Car
90
86
84
.3
85
.2
70
84
.7
81
.6
78
.4
80
75
92
9
91 2.4
.2
95
84 85.085.1
.4
82
.7
80
.5
.7
88
91
Plane
94 93 94
.0 .9 .1
.5
.0
.6
86
.9
84
84
.1
.7
85
.7
88
.7
84
.2
8
81 2.4
.2
81
.6
79
.2
79
.8
85
.5
89 90. 89
.6 0 .7
87
.
.7 8
86
8
82 3.2
.1
74
73
.1
.1
VGGNet
Food
9 9
91 92.4 2.9 2.6
.6
92
ResNet
Baseline
DLA
VGGNet
Compact
ResNet
Kernel
DLA
DLA-X-60-C
VGGNet
ResNet
DLA-34
DLA
DLA-60
VGGNet
DLA-X-60
ResNet
DLA
DLA-102
Figure 6: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on fine-grained datasets. Image classification accuracy on Bird [40],
Car [22], Plane [31], and Food [5]. Higher is better. P is the number of parameters in each model. For fair comparison,
we calculate the number of parameters for 1000-way classification. V- and R- indicate the base model as VGGNet-16 and
ResNet-50, respectively. The numbers of Baseline, Compact [13] and Kernel [9] are directly cited from [9].
ablations. We use the standard mean intersection-over-union
(IoU) score [12] as the evaluation metric for both datasets.
Our networks are trained only on the training set without the
usage of validation or other further data.
CamVid has 367 training images, 100 validation images,
and 233 test images with 11 semantic categories. We start
the training with learning rate 0.01 and divide it by 10 after
800 epochs. The results are shown in Table 8. We find that
models with downsampling rate 2 consistenly outperforms
those downsampling by 8. We also try to augment the data
by randomly rotating the images between [-10, 10] degrees
and randomly scaling the images between 0.5 and 2. The
final results are significantly better than prior methods.
Cityscapes has 2, 975 training images, 500 validation images, and 1, 525 test images with 19 semantic categories.
Following previous works [49], we adopt the poly learnepoch−1 0.9
ing rate (1 − total
with momentum 0.9 and train the
epoch )
model for 500 epochs with batch size 16. The starting learning rate is 0.01 and the crop size is chosen to be 864. We also
augment the data by randomly rotating within 10 degrees
and scaling between 0.5 and 2. The validation results are
shown in 9. Surprisingly, DLA-34 performs very well on
this dataset and it is as accurate as DLA-102. It should be
noted that fine spatial details do not contribute much for this
choice of metric. RefineNet [28] is the strongest network in
the same class of methods without the computational costs
of additional data, dilation, and graphical models. To make a
fair comparison, we evaluate in the same multi-scale fashion
as that approach with image scales of [0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.25, 1.5]
and sum the predictions. DLA improves by 2+ points.
5.4. Boundary Detection
Boundary detection is an exacting task of localization.
Although as a classification problem it is only a binary task
of whether or not a boundary exists, the metrics require
precise spatial accuracy. We evaluate on classic BSDS [1]
with multiple human boundary annotations and PASCAL
boundaries [32] with boundaries defined by instances masks
of select semantic classes. The metrics are accuracies at
different thresholds, the optimal dataset scale (ODS) and
Method
DLA-34 8s
DLA-34 2s
DLA-102 2s
Split
Val
FCN-8s [35]
RefineNet-101 [28]
DLA-102
DLA-169
Test
mIoU
73.4
74.5
74.4
Method
SegNet [2]
DeepLab-LFOV [7]
Dilation8 [45]
FSO [24]
DLA-34 8s
DLA-34 2s
DLA-102 2s
65.3
73.6
75.3
75.9
Table 4: Evaluation on Cityscapes to compare strides on
validation and to compare against existing methods on test.
DLA is the best-in-class among methods in the same setting.
1
Precision
Table 5: Evaluation on CamVid. Higher depth and resolution
help. DLA is state-of-the-art.
Method
SE [10]
HED [43]
DLA-34 2s
DLA-102 2s
0.9
0.8
[F=.80] Human
[F=.80] DLA-102
[F=.79] DLA-34
[F=.79] HED
[F=.77] DLA-34 4s
[F=.76] DLA-34 8s
0.7
0.6
0.5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
mIoU
46.4
61.6
65.3
66.1
66.7
68.5
71.0
DSBD [32]
M-DSBD [32]
DLA-34 2s
DLA-102 2s
Train
ODS
OIS
AP
BSDS
0.541
0.553
0.642
0.648
0.570
0.585
0.668
0.674
0.486
0.518
0.624
0.623
PASCAL
0.643
0.652
0.743
0.754
0.663
0.678
0.757
0.766
0.650
0.674
0.763
0.752
Recall
Figure 7: Precision-recall evaluation on BSDS. DLA is the
closest to human performance.
Method
ODS
OIS
AP
SE [10]
DeepEdge [3]
DeepContour [36]
HED [42]
CEDN [43]†
UberNet [21] (1-Task)†
0.746
0.753
0.756
0.788
0.788
0.791
0.767
0.772
0.773
0.808
0.804
0.809
0.803
0.807
0.797
0.840
0.821
0.849
DLA-34 8s
DLA-34 4s
DLA-34 2s
DLA-102 2s
0.760
0.767
0.794
0.803
0.772
0.778
0.808
0.813
0.739
0.751
0.787
0.781
Table 6: Evaluation on BSDS († indicates outside data). ODS
and OIS are state-of-the-art, but AP suffers due to recall. See
Figure 7.
more lenient optimal image scale (OIS), as well as average
precision (AP). Results are shown in for BSDS in Table 6
and the precision-recall plot of Figure 7 and for PASCAL
boundaries in Table 7.
To address this task we follow the training procedure of
HED [42]. In line with other deep learning methods, we
Table 7: Evaluation on PASCAL Boundaries. DLA is stateof-the-art.
take the consensus of human annotations on BSDS and only
supervise our network with boundaries that three or more
annotators agree on. Following [43], we give the boundary
labels 10 times weight of the others. For inference we simply
run the net forward, and do not make use of ensembles
or multi-scale testing. Assessing the role of resolution by
comparing strides of 8, 4, and 2 we find that high output
resolution is critical for accurate boundary detection. We
also find that deeper networks does not continue improving
the prediction performance on BSDS.
On both BSDS and PASCAL boundaries we achieve
state-of-the-art ODS and OIS scores. In contrast the AP
on BSDS is surprisingly low, so to understand why we plot
the precision-recall curve in Figure 7. Our approach has
lower recall, but this is explained by the consensus ground
truth not covering all of the individual, noisy boundaries. At
the same time it is the closest to human performance. On
the other hand we achieve state-of-the-art AP on PASCAL
boundaries since it has a single, consistent notion of boundaries. When training on BSDS and transferring to PASCAL
boundaries the improvement is minor, but training on PASCAL boundaries itself with ∼ 10× the data delivers more
than 10% relative improvement over competing methods.
6. Conclusion
Aggregation is a decisive aspect of architecture, and as the
number of modules multiply their connectivity is made all
the more important. By relating architectures for aggregating
channels, scales, and resolutions we identified the need for
deeper aggregation, and addressed it by iterative deep aggregation and hierarchical deep aggregation. Our deep layer
aggregation networks are more accurate and make more
efficient use of parameters and computation than baseline
networks. Our aggregation extensions improve on dominant
architectures like residual and densely connected networks.
Bridging the gaps of architecture makes better use of layers
in aggregate.
References
[1] P. Arbelaez, M. Maire, C. Fowlkes, and J. Malik. Contour
detection and hierarchical image segmentation. TPAMI, 2011.
7
[2] V. Badrinarayanan, A. Kendall, and R. Cipolla. Segnet: A
deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image
segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.00561, 2015. 8
[3] G. Bertasius, J. Shi, and L. Torresani. DeepEdge: A multiscale bifurcated deep network for top-down contour detection.
In CVPR, 2015. 8
[4] C. M. Bishop. Pattern recognition and machine learning,
page 229. Springer-Verlag New York, 2006. 1
[5] L. Bossard, M. Guillaumin, and L. Van Gool. Food-101–
mining discriminative components with random forests. In
ECCV, 2014. 6, 7
[6] G. J. Brostow, J. Fauqueur, and R. Cipolla. Semantic object
classes in video: A high-definition ground truth database.
Pattern Recognition Letters, 2009. 6
[7] L.-C. Chen, G. Papandreou, I. Kokkinos, K. Murphy, and A. L.
Yuille. Semantic image segmentation with deep convolutional
nets and fully connected crfs. In ICLR, 2015. 8
[8] M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler,
R. Benenson, U. Franke, S. Roth, and B. Schiele. The
cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In
CVPR, 2016. 2, 6
[9] Y. Cui, F. Zhou, J. Wang, X. Liu, Y. Lin, and S. Belongie.
Kernel pooling for convolutional neural networks. In CVPR,
2017. 6, 7
[10] P. Dollár and C. L. Zitnick. Structured forests for fast edge
detection. In ICCV, 2013. 8
[11] J. Donahue, Y. Jia, O. Vinyals, J. Hoffman, N. Zhang,
E. Tzeng, and T. Darrell. Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition. In ICML, 2014. 1,
2
[12] M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. Williams, J. Winn, and
A. Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge.
IJCV, 2010. 7
[13] Y. Gao, O. Beijbom, N. Zhang, and T. Darrell. Compact
bilinear pooling. In CVPR, 2016. 7
[14] R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. Regionbased convolutional networks for accurate object detection
and segmentation. PAMI, 2015. 1, 2
[15] B. Hariharan, P. Arbeláez, R. Girshick, and J. Malik. Hypercolumns for object segmentation and fine-grained localization.
In CVPR, 2015. 1, 5
[16] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning
for image recognition. In CVPR, 2016. 1, 2, 5, 11
[17] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Identity mappings in
deep residual networks. In ECCV, 2016. 1, 4
[18] A. G. Howard. Some improvements on deep convolutional
neural network based image classification. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1312.5402, 2013. 6
[19] G. Huang, Z. Liu, K. Q. Weinberger, and L. van der Maaten.
Densely connected convolutional networks. In CVPR, 2017.
1, 2
[20] F. N. Iandola, S. Han, M. W. Moskewicz, K. Ashraf, W. J.
Dally, and K. Keutzer. Squeezenet: Alexnet-level accuracy
with 50x fewer parameters and < 0.5 mb model size. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1602.07360, 2016. 6
[21] I. Kokkinos. Ubernet: Training auniversal’convolutional
neural network for low-, mid-, and high-level vision using diverse datasets and limited memory. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1609.02132, 2016. 8
[22] J. Krause, M. Stark, J. Deng, and L. Fei-Fei. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In ICCV Workshops, 2013. 6, 7
[23] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet
classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In
NIPS, 2012. 1, 2, 6
[24] A. Kundu, V. Vineet, and V. Koltun. Feature space optimization for semantic video segmentation. In CVPR, 2016. 8
[25] G. Larsson, M. Maire, and G. Shakhnarovich. Fractalnet:
Ultra-deep neural networks without residuals. In ICLR, 2017.
2
[26] Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradientbased learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings
of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, 1998. 1
[27] C.-Y. Lee, S. Xie, P. Gallagher, Z. Zhang, and Z. Tu. Deeplysupervised nets. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages
562–570, 2015. 2
[28] G. Lin, A. Milan, C. Shen, and I. Reid. Refinenet: Multipath refinement networks with identity mappings for highresolution semantic segmentation. In CVPR, 2017. 7, 8
[29] M. Lin, Q. Chen, and S. Yan. Network in network. In ICLR,
2014. 1, 2
[30] T.-Y. Lin, P. Dollár, R. Girshick, K. He, B. Hariharan, and
S. Belongie. Feature pyramid networks for object detection.
In CVPR, 2017. 1, 2, 3, 5
[31] S. Maji, E. Rahtu, J. Kannala, M. Blaschko, and A. Vedaldi.
Fine-grained visual classification of aircraft. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1306.5151, 2013. 6, 7
[32] V. Premachandran, B. Bonev, X. Lian, and A. Yuille. Pascal boundaries: A semantic boundary dataset with a deep
semantic boundary detector. In WACV, 2017. 2, 7, 8
[33] O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox. U-net: Convolutional
networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International
Conference on Medical Image Computing and ComputerAssisted Intervention, 2015. 3
[34] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma,
Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV, 2015. 2,
5
[35] E. Shelhamer, J. Long, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional
networks for semantic segmentation. TPAMI, 2016. 1, 2, 3, 5,
8
[36] W. Shen, X. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Bai, and Z. Zhang. DeepContour: A deep convolutional feature learned by positive-sharing
loss for contour detection. In CVPR, 2015. 8
[37] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional
networks for large-scale image recognition. In ICLR, 2015. 1
[38] R. K. Srivastava, K. Greff, and J. Schmidhuber. Highway
networks. In NIPS, 2015. 1, 2
[39] C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov,
D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich. Going deeper
with convolutions. In CVPR, 2015. 1, 2, 6
[40] C. Wah, S. Branson, P. Welinder, P. Perona, and S. Belongie.
The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset. 2011. 6, 7
[41] S. Xie, R. Girshick, P. Dollár, Z. Tu, and K. He. Aggregated
residual transformations for deep neural networks. In CVPR,
2017. 2, 4, 5, 11
[42] S. Xie and Z. Tu. Holistically-nested edge detection. In ICCV,
2015. 1, 8
[43] J. Yang, B. Price, S. Cohen, H. Lee, and M.-H. Yang. Object
contour detection with a fully convolutional encoder-decoder
network. In CVPR, 2016. 8
[44] J. Yosinski, J. Clune, Y. Bengio, and H. Lipson. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In NIPS, 2014.
1
[45] F. Yu and V. Koltun. Multi-scale context aggregation by
dilated convolutions. In ICLR, 2016. 8
[46] F. Yu, V. Koltun, and T. Funkhouser. Dilated residual networks. In CVPR, 2017. 1, 5
[47] S. Zagoruyko and N. Komodakis. Wide residual networks.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07146, 2016. 1
[48] M. D. Zeiler and R. Fergus. Visualizing and understanding
convolutional networks. In ECCV, 2014. 1, 2
[49] H. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, and J. Jia. Pyramid scene
parsing network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01105, 2016. 7
A. ImageNet Classification
The concept of DLA framework is general since it doesn’t
require particular designs of convolution blocks. We also
turn to simple design of aggregation nodes in our applications. Figure 8 shows the aggregation nodes for hierarchical
aggregation. It is a concatenation of the input channels followed by a 1 × 1 convolution. We explore adding residual
connection in the aggregation as shown in Figure 8(c). It
is only used when there are more than 100 layers in the
classification network. Three types of convolutional blocks
are studied in this paper, as shown in Figure 9, since they
are widely used in deep learning literature. Because the
convolutional blocks will be combined with additional linear
projection in the aggregation nodes, we reduce the ratio of
bottleneck blocks from 4 to 2.
We compare DLA and DLA-X to other networks in Figure 5 in the submitted paper in terms of network parameters
and classification accuracy. DLA includes the networks using residual blocks in ResNet and DLA-X includes those
using the block in ResNeXt. For fair comparison, we design
DLA and DLA-X networks with similar depth and channels
with their counterparts. The ResNet models are ResNet-34,
ResNet-50, ResNet-101 and ResNet-152. The corresponding DLA model depths are 34, 60, 102, 169. The ResNeXt
models are ResNeXt-50 (32x4d), ResNeXt-101 (32x4d), and
ResNeXt-101 (64x4d). The corresponding DLA-X model
depths are 60 and 102, while the third DLA-X model double the number of 3 × 3 bottleneck channels, similar to
ResNeXt-101 (64x4d).
B. Semantic Segmentation
We report experiments for semantic segmentation on
CamVid and Cityscapes. Table 8 shows a breakdown of
the accuracies for the categories. We also add data agumention in the CamVid training, as shown in the third group of
Table 8. It includes random rotating the images between -10
and 10 degrees and random scaling between 0.5 and 2. We
find the results can be further improved by the augmentation.
Table 9 shows the breakdown of categories in Cityscapes on
the validation set. We also test the models on multiple scales
of the images. This testing procedure is used in evaluating
the models on the testing images in the previous works.
ReLU
BN
(b) Plain 3-node
Conv
Concat
ReLU
BN
Conv
Concat
3-Node
Conv
Block
Conv
Block
2-Node
Conv
Block
Conv
Block
(a) 3-level hierarchical aggregation
(c) Residual 3-node
Figure 8: Illustration of aggregation node architectures.
n, 1 x 1, n/2
n/2, 3 x 3, n/2
n/2, 1 x 1, n
n, 3 x 3, n
n, 3 x 3, n
(a) Basic
(b) Bottleneck
n/32, 1 x 1, n
n/32, 3 x 3, n/32
n, 1 x 1, n/32
32 Paths
32 Paths
32 Paths
n/32, 1 x 1, n
n/32, 3 x 3, n/32
n, 1 x 1, n/32
(c) Split
.
Tree
Sky
Car
Sign
Road
Pedestrian
Fence
Pole
Sidewalk
Bicyclist
mean IoU
DLA-60
DLA-102
DLA-169
Building
DLA-34 8s
DLA-60 8s
DLA-34
DLA-60
DLA-102
Data Aug
Figure 9: Convolutional blocks used in this paper. Our aggregation architecture is as general as stacking layers, so we can use
the building blocks of existing networks. The layer labels indicate output channels, kernel size and input channels. (a) and (b)
are derived from [16] and (c) from [41].
No
83.2
83.0
83.2
84.4
84.9
77.2
77.0
76.4
77.7
78.0
91.2
91.4
92.5
92.6
92.5
83.6
84.1
84.6
87.1
86.4
48.8
46.9
52.1
51.4
50.8
94.3
94.1
94.4
95.3
94.9
58.6
58.3
61.5
62.2
62.8
32.0
32.8
29.4
32.1
45.4
27.8
26.0
35.1
36.2
35.7
81.1
81.3
82.0
84.5
83.7
55.4
56.8
57.8
64.1
65.8
66.7
66.5
68.1
69.8
71.0
Yes
86.6
86.6
86.9
79.3
78.8
78.9
92.5
92.2
92.5
90.9
90.3
89.9
55.3
57.9
58.5
96.2
96.5
96.5
65.5
66.7
66.1
48.6
49.6
55.4
37.4
38.7
39.0
86.9
87.9
87.7
66.5
66.7
67.7
73.2
73.8
74.4
Road
Sidewalk
Building
Wall
Fence
Pole
Light
Sign
Vegetation
Terrain
Sky
Person
Rider
Car
Truck
Bus
Train
Motorcycle
Bicycle
mean IoU
Table 8: Semantic segmentation results on the CamVid dataset.
DLA-34 8s
DLA-34
DLA-102
DLA-169
97.9
98.0
98.0
98.2
83.2
83.5
84.3
84.8
91.9
92.1
92.3
92.5
47.7
51.0
43.2
45.9
57.7
56.8
56.9
60.0
62.4
64.9
67.2
68.0
68.6
69.6
71.6
72.3
77.3
78.5
80.9
81.1
92.2
92.4
92.5
92.7
60.4
62.9
61.4
61.9
94.8
95.1
94.6
95.1
81.1
81.5
82.7
83.4
59.8
59.6
61.5
63.3
94.1
94.5
94.5
95.3
57.5
59.0
60.3
70.9
76.6
78.4
77.7
80.8
54.2
57.8
53.8
48.1
59.7
62.9
62.2
65.4
76.6
76.9
78.5
79.1
73.4
74.5
74.4
75.7
DLA-34 MS
DLA-102 MS
DLA-169 MS
98.2 84.7 92.5 54.3 59.5 65.9 71.1 79.5 92.7 64.1 95.3 82.6 61.8 94.7 63.3 83.7 64.6 64.2 77.6
98.5 85.0 92.5 47.1 56.7 66.9 74.4 78.6 93.6 71.7 95.1 85.8 67.4 95.3 55.8 63.5 57.8 68.1 76.1
98.3 85.9 92.8 48.3 61.2 69.0 73.4 82.2 92.9 63.1 95.4 84.2 65.1 95.7 76.3 82.9 49.6 68.5 80.2
76.3
76.1
77.1
Table 9: Performance of DLA on the Cityscapes validation set. s8 indicates the input image is downsampled by 8 in the model
output. It is 2 by default. Lower downsampling rate usually leads to higher accuracy. “MS” indicates the models are tested on
on multiple scales of the input images.
| 1cs.CV
|
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Preprint 15 November 2017
Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0
Uncertainty quantification for radio interferometric imaging:
II. MAP estimation
Xiaohao
Cai1? , Marcelo Pereyra2? and Jason D. McEwen1?
1
Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London (UCL), Surrey RH5 6NT, United Kingdom
Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom
2 Maxwell
arXiv:1711.04819v1 [astro-ph.IM] 13 Nov 2017
Accepted —. Received —; in original form —
ABSTRACT
Uncertainty quantification is a critical missing component in radio interferometric imaging
that will only become increasingly important as the big-data era of radio interferometry
emerges. Statistical sampling approaches to perform Bayesian inference, like Markov Chain
Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling, can in principle recover the full posterior distribution of the
image, from which uncertainties can then be quantified. However, for massive data sizes, like
those anticipated from the Square Kilometre Array (SKA), it will be difficult if not impossible
to apply any MCMC technique due to its inherent computational cost. We formulate Bayesian
inference problems with sparsity-promoting priors (motivated by compressive sensing), for
which we recover maximum a posteriori (MAP) point estimators of radio interferometric
images by convex optimisation. Exploiting recent developments in the theory of probability concentration, we quantify uncertainties by post-processing the recovered MAP estimate.
Three strategies to quantify uncertainties are developed: (i) highest posterior density credible regions; (ii) local credible intervals (cf. error bars) for individual pixels and superpixels;
and (iii) hypothesis testing of image structure. These forms of uncertainty quantification provide rich information for analysing radio interferometric observations in a statistically robust
manner. Our MAP-based methods are approximately 105 times faster computationally than
state-of-the-art MCMC methods and, in addition, support highly distributed and parallelised
algorithmic structures. For the first time, our MAP-based techniques provide a means of quantifying uncertainties for radio interferometric imaging for realistic data volumes and practical
use, and scale to the emerging big-data era of radio astronomy.
Key words: techniques: image processing – techniques: interferometric – methods: data analysis – methods: numerical – methods: statistical.
1
INTRODUCTION
Radio interferometric (RI) telescopes provide observations of the
radio emission of the sky with high angular resolution and sensitivity, and provide a wealth of valuable information for astrophysics and cosmology (Ryle & Vonberg 1946; Ryle & Hewish
1960; Thompson et al. 2008). Radio interferometers essentially acquire Fourier measurements of the sky image of interest. Imaging
observations made by radio interferometers thus requires solving an
ill-posed linear inverse problem (Thompson et al. 2008), which is
an important first step in many subsequent scientific analyses. Since
the inverse problem is ill-posed (sometimes seriously), uncertainty
information (e.g. error estimates) regarding reconstructed images is
critical. Nevertheless, uncertainty information is currently lacking
in all RI imaging techniques used in practice. In Cai et al. (2017),
?
E-mail: [email protected] (XC); [email protected] (MP);
[email protected] (JDM)
c 2017 The Authors
the first of these companion articles, we propose uncertainty quantification strategies for RI imaging based on state-of-the-art Markov
chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods that sample the full posterior distribution of the image, with the sparsity-promoting priors
that have been shown in practice to be highly effective (e.g. Pratley
et al. 2016). Excellent results were achieved and a variety of different uncertainty quantification strategies were presented. However,
it is difficult to scale these strategies to big-data due to their high
computational overhead. We address this issue in the current article.
Over the coming decades radio astronomy will transition into
the so-called big-data era. Generally speaking, the new generation of radio telescopes, such as the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR1 ), the Extended Very Large Array (EVLA2 ), the Australian
1
2
http://www.lofar.org
http://www.aoc.nrao.edu/evla
2
Cai et al.
Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP3 ), and the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA4 ), will achieve much higher dynamic
range and angular resolution than previous instruments and will
acquire very large volumes of data. The Square Kilometer Array
(SKA5 ) will provide a considerable step again in dynamic range
(six or seven orders of magnitude beyond prior telescopes) and angular resolution, and will acquire massive volumes of data, ushering in the big-data era of radio astronomy. This emerging era
of big-data, inevitably, will bring further challenges and so uncertainty quantification will be increasingly important. As discussed
in Cai et al. (2017), existing image reconstruction techniques, such
as CLEAN-based methods (Högbom 1974; Bhatnagar & Corwnell
2004; Cornwell 2008; Stewart et al. 2011), the maximum entropy
method (MEM) (Ables 1974; Gull & Daniell 1978; Cornwell &
Evans 1985), and compressed sensing (CS) methods (Wiaux et al.
2009a,b; McEwen & Wiaux 2011; Li et al. 2011a,b; Carrillo et al.
2012, 2014; Wolz et al. 2013; Dabbech et al. 2015; Dabbech et al.
2017; Garsden et al. 2015; Onose et al. 2016, 2017; Pratley et al.
2016; Kartik et al. 2017), do not provide uncertainty information
regarding their reconstructed images. The approaches that do provide some form of uncertainty quantification (Sutter et al. 2014;
Junklewitz et al. 2016; Greiner et al. 2017) cannot scale to bigdata due to their high computational cost, are typically restricted to
Gaussian or log-normal priors, and are not currently used in practice. Please see our first article in this companion series (Cai et al.
2017) for a more thorough review of RI imaging techniques and
their properties.
The current state of the field thus triggers an urgent need to
develop efficient uncertainty quantification methods for RI imaging that scale to big-data. Furthermore, we seek to support the
sparsity-promoting priors that have been demonstrated in practice
to be highly effective for RI imaging (e.g. Pratley et al. 2016). In
Cai et al. (2017) (the first part of this companion series), we proposed uncertainty quantification methods to address the RI imaging
problem with sparse priors. In the current article (the second part
of this companion series), we present fast uncertainty quantification methods that not only support sparse priors but also scale to
big-data. The techniques presented in this article are very different
to those presented in Cai et al. (2017) but support the same forms
of uncertainty quantification.
The uncertainty quantification methods proposed in Cai et al.
(2017) are based on two proximal MCMC sampling methods, i.e.
the Moreau-Yoshida unadjusted Langevin algorithm (MYULA)
(Durmus et al. 2016) and the proximal Metropolis-adjusted
Langevin algorithm (Px-MALA) (Pereyra 2015). The main steps
of the uncertainty quantification strategies presented in Cai et al.
(2017) can be briefly summarised as follows: firstly, the posterior distribution of the image is MCMC sampled; then, uncertainty
quantification is performed by using the generated samples to compute local (pixel-wise) credible intervals, highest posterior density
(HPD) credible regions, and to perform hypothesis testing of image structure. Two frameworks – analysis and synthesis models –
are considered. While excellent results were achieved in Cai et al.
(2017), when it comes to big-data, the proposed approach would
suffer due to the long computation time required to sample the posterior distribution (as would be the case for any MCMC sampling
approach).
3
4
5
http://www.atnf.csiro.au/projects/askap
http://www.mwatelescope.org/telescope
http://www.skatelescope.org/
In this article we exploit an analytic method to approximate
HPD credible regions from maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimators, as derived in Pereyra (2016a), in order to develop very fast
methods to perform uncertainty quantification for RI imaging. Our
approach supports sparse priors and scales to massive data sizes,
i.e. to big-data. We begin by formulating Bayesian MAP estimation
for RI imaging as unconstrained convex optimisation problems, for
analysis and synthesis forms. These are subsequently solved efficiently by using convex minimisation algorithms (e.g. Combettes
& Pesquet 2010). Recent advances in convex optimisation have resulted in techniques that achieve excellent reconstruction fidelity
(with convergence guarantees), are flexible, and exhibit relatively
low computational costs. They also afford algorithmic structures
that can be highly distributed and parallelised (e.g. Carrillo et al.
2014; Onose et al. 2016). Note, specifically, that only one point estimator is computed here for the analysis or synthesis form, in contrast to sampling approaches that seek to explore the full posterior
distribution as in Cai et al. (2017), which is very time consuming.
MAP estimation is then followed by various strategies to quantify
uncertainties. Precisely, first the method of Pereyra (2016a) is used
to obtain approximate HPD credible regions for the recovered image. These HPD regions are then used, for the first time, to compute local credible intervals (cf. error bars) that analyse uncertainty
spatially and at different scales (pixles or superpixels). Finally, we
also use the HPD credible regions to perform hypothesis tests of
image structure. We test our proposed approaches on simulated RI
observations to demonstrate their effectiveness and compare with
the MCMC methods presented in Cai et al. (2017).
The remainder of this article is organised as follows. In Section 2 we review the RI imaging inverse problem. In Section 3 we
apply convex optimisation algorithms to solve the MAP estimation
problem for RI imaging in the context of sparse priors. Uncertainty
quantification techniques for RI imaging based on MAP estimation are formulated in Section 4. The performance of the proposed
methods is then evaluated numerically in Section 5, where we compare uncertainties quantified by proximal MCMC methods and by
MAP estimation. Finally, we conclude in Section 6 with a summary
of our main contributions and a discussion of planned extensions.
2
RADIO INTERFEROMETRIC IMAGING
In this section the inverse problem related to RI image reconstruction is introduced. We briefly recall the use of proximal MCMC
methods to solve this problem (Cai et al. 2017), which we use as
a benchmark in the experiments that follow. Finally, an introduction to Bayesian MAP estimation approaches for RI imaging is
presented, which may be solved by efficient convex optimisation
strategies.
2.1
Radio interferometry
Here, we concisely recall the inverse problem of RI imaging (for
further details see Cai et al. 2017 and references therein). When
the baselines in an array are co-planar and the field of view is
narrow, the visibilities, y, can be measured by correlating the signals from pairs of antennas, separated by the baseline components
u = (u, v). Let x represent the sky brightness distribution, described in coordinates l = (l, m), and A(l) represent the primary
beam of the telescope. The general RI equation for acquiring y can
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
be represented as (Thompson et al. 2008)
Z
y(u) = A(l)x(l)e−2πiu·l d2 l.
(1)
Recovering the sky intensity signal x from the measured visibilities
y acquired according to equation (1) then amounts to solving a
linear inverse problem (Rau et al. 2009).
In the discretised setting, let x ∈ RN represent the sampled
intensity signal (the sky brightness distribution). In particular, x
can be represented by
X
x = Ψa =
Ψi ai ,
(2)
i
where Ψ ∈ CN ×L is a basis or dictionary (e.g., a wavelet basis or
an over-complete frame) and vector a = (a1 , · · · , aL )> represents
the synthesis coefficients of x under Ψ. In particular, x is said to
be sparse if a contains only K non-zero coefficients, K N , or
compressible if many coefficients of a are nearly zero. In practice,
it is ubiquitous that natural images are sparse or compressible for
approriate choices of Ψ. Refer to Cai et al. (2017) for more details
about sparse representation.
Let y ∈ CM be the M visibilities observed under a linear
measurement operator Φ ∈ CM ×N modelling the realistic acquisition of the sky brightness distribution. Then, we have
y = Φx + n
or y = ΦΨa + n,
(3)
where n ∈ CM is the instrumental noise. Without loss of generality, we subsequently consider independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) Gaussian noise. In practice, y is only observed partially or with limited resolution and thus solving (3) for x presents
an ill-posed inverse problem.
2.2
Bayesian inference
The RI inverse problem (3) can be solved elegantly in the Bayesian
statistical framework, which provides tools to estimate x as well as
to quantify the uncertainty in the estimated solutions.
Let p(y|x) be the likelihood function of the statistical model
associated with (3). In the case of i.i.d. Gaussian noise this reads
p(y|x) ∝ exp(−ky − Φxk22 /2σ 2 ),
(4)
where σ represents the standard deviation of the noise level.
Recovering x directly from y is not possible because the problem is not well posed. Bayesian methods use prior knowledge to
address this difficulty. Precisely, they use a prior distribution p(x)
to regularise the problem, reduce uncertainty, and improve estimation results. Here we consider both analysis and synthesis formulations because they are both widely used in RI imaging. For analysis
models we use Laplace-type priors of the form
p(x) ∝ exp(−µkΨ† xk1 ),
(5)
where Ψ† denotes the adjoint of Ψ, µ > 0 is a regularisation parameter, and k·k1 is the `1 norm. Analogously, for synthesis models
we use
p(a) ∝ exp(−µkak1 ).
(6)
Observe that both formulations are equivalent when Ψ is an orthogonal basis. However, for redundant dictionaries the approaches
have very different properties. Please see Cai et al. (2017) for more
details about this model and other models used in RI imaging.
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
3
The observed and prior information are then combined by using Bayes’ theorem to obtain the posterior distribution, which models our knowledge about x after observing y. For the analysis formulation this is given by
p(x|y) = R
RN
p(y|x)p(x)
.
p(y|x)p(x)dx
(7)
Similarly, for the synthesis model the posterior reads
p(y|a)p(a)
,
p(y|a)p(a)da
p(a|y) = R
(8)
RN
with p(y|a) = p(y|x) for x = Ψa. Refer to Cai et al. (2017) for
more detailed discussion about Bayesian inference in the context
of RI imaging.
2.3
Proximal MCMC methods
To solve the ill-posed inverse problem in (3) with sparsitypromoting priors, which have been shown in practice to be highly
effective (Pratley et al. 2016), while also performing uncertainty
quantification, two proximal MCMC methods to perform Bayesian
inference for RI imaging were developed in the companion article
(Cai et al. 2017). These proximal MCMC methods seek to sample
the full posterior density p(x|y) that models our understanding of
the image x given data y, in the context of prior information. From
the full posterior, summary estimators of x and other quantities of
interest can be computed. In particular, in Cai et al. (2017) these
methods are used to perform a range of uncertainty quantification
analysis for RI images.
One of the proximal MCMC methods presented in Cai et al.
(2017), MYULA, scales efficiently to high dimensions but suffers
from some estimation bias (Durmus et al. 2016). The other, PxMALA, corrects this bias by using a Metropolis-Hastings correction step, at the expense of a higher computational cost and slower
convergence (Pereyra 2015). Since Px-MALA can provide results
with corrected bias and thus is more accurate, we use it as a benchmark in the subsequent numerical tests presented in this work. Nevertheless, the MCMC methods discussed in Cai et al. (2017) will
suffer when scaling to big-data (as will any MCMC method), which
motives us to explore alternative faster methods that can scale to
big-data.
In this article we develop methods for uncertainty quantification based on MAP estimation. We emphasise that while MCMC
methods such as Px-MALA are not as efficient as MAP estimation
(the main focus in this article), and do not scale to large RI datasets,
they are useful for smaller datasets and as a benchmark for the efficient alternative methods that we propose in Section 4.
2.4
Maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation
As discussed in the previous sections, sampling the full posterior p(x|y) or p(a|y) by MCMC methods is difficult because of
the high dimensionality involved. Instead, Bayesian estimators that
summarise p(x|y) or p(a|y) are often computed. In particular, one
common approach is to compute MAP (maximum-a-posteriori) estimators given by
n
o
xmap = argmin µkΨ† xk1 + ky − Φxk22 /2σ 2 ,
(9)
x
for the analysis model, and for the synthesis model by
n
o
xmap = Ψ × argmin µkak1 + ky − ΦΨak22 /2σ 2 .
a
(10)
4
Cai et al.
As we discuss below, a main computational advantage of the
MAP estimators (9) and (10) is that they can be computed very
efficiently, even in high dimensions, by using convex optimisation
algorithms (e.g. Combettes & Pesquet 2010; Green et al. 2015).
There is also abundant empirical evidence suggesting that these estimators deliver accurate reconstruction results (see Pereyra 2016b
also for a theoretical analysis of MAP estimation). However, since
MAP estimation results in a single point estimator, we typical lose
uncertainty information that MCMC methods can provide (Cai
et al. 2017). On the contrary, however, as we show in this article
it is possible to approximately quantify the uncertainties associated
with MAP estimators by leveraging recent results in the theory of
probability concentration (Pereyra 2016a). Consequently, using the
techniques presented later in this article MAP estimation can provide fast methods that scale to big-data and that quantify uncertainties.
2.5
Convex optimisation methods for MAP estimation
There are several convex optimisation methods that can be used to
solve the MAP estimation problems (9) and (10) efficiently, such
as forward-backward splitting, Douglas-Rachford splitting, or alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) (see Combettes
& Pesquet 2010). In our experiments (9) and (10) are solved by
adopting the simple forward-backward algorithm, which we detail
below.
Forward-backward splitting algorithms solve optimisation
problems of the form
argmin(f + g)(x),
(11)
x∈RN
by using a splitting of (f + g)(x). We consider the setting where
f ∈
/ C 1 is proper, convex and lower semi-continuous (l.s.c.) and
g ∈ C 1 is l.s.c. convex and βLip -Lipchitz differentiable, i.e.,
k∇g(ẑ) − ∇g(z̄)k ≤ βLip kẑ − z̄k, ∀(ẑ, z̄) ∈ CN × CN . (12)
Precisely, forward-backward algorithms solve (11) by using the iteration
x
(i+1)
= proxλ(i) f (x
(i)
(i)
(i)
− λ ∇g(x )),
(13)
where λ(i) is the step size in a suitable bounded interval (see, e.g.,
Combettes & Pesquet 2010). The proximity operator of λf is defined as (Moreau 1965)
proxλf (z) ≡ argmin f (u) + ku − zk2 /2λ .
(14)
u∈RN
There are several refinements of (13) with better convergence
properties. For example, using relaxation leads to the iteration
x(i+1) = (1 − β (i) )x(i) + β (i) x̃(i+1) ,
(15)
where x̃(i+1) is computed by (13), β (i) is a sequence of relaxation parameters, λ(i) ∈ (, 2/βLip − ), β (i) ∈ (, 1), and
∈ (0, min{1, 1/βLip }) (Combettes & Wajs 2005); or with λ(i) =
1/βLip , β (i) ∈ (, 3/2 − ), and ∈ (0, 3/4) (Bauschke & Combettes 2011). Furthermore, algorithmic structures that allow computations to be highly distributed and parallelised can also be developed (e.g. Carrillo et al. 2014; Onose et al. 2016) to assist in
scaling to big-data.
estimation problems for both the analysis setting (9) and synthesis
setting (10). For the sake of brevity, henceforth the labels ¯ and
ˆ denote symbols related to the analysis and synthesis models, respectively.
3.1
Analysis
For the analysis setting (9), set f¯(x) = µkΨ† xk1 and ḡ(x) =
ky − Φxk22 /2σ 2 . Then
n
o
argmin f¯(x) + ḡ(x)
(16)
x
can be solved using the forward-backward iteration formula (13),
leading to the iterations
x(i+1) = proxλ(i) f¯(x(i) − λ(i) ∇ḡ(x(i) )).
(17)
Assume for now Ψ† Ψ = I, where I is identity matrix (although this
assumption is not essential and relaxed later). We have, ∀z̄ ∈ RN ,
proxλf¯(z̄) = z̄ + Ψ softλµ (Ψ† z̄) − Ψ† z̄ ,
(18)
and
∇ḡ(x) = Φ† (Φx − y)/σ 2 ,
(19)
where softλ (z) = softλ (z1 ), softλ (z2 ), · · · is the pointwise
soft-thresholding operator of vector z defined by
(
zj (|zj | − λ)/|zj | if |zj | > λ,
softλ (zj ) =
(20)
0
otherwise,
for every component zj . Refer to Cai et al. (2017) for the derivation
of (18). Substituting (18) and (19) into (17), the analysis problem
(9) can be solved iteratively by
v (i+1) = x(i) − λ(i) Φ† (Φx(i) − y)/σ 2 ,
x(i+1) = v (i+1) +Ψ softλ(i) µ (Ψ† v (i+1) )−Ψ† v (i+1) ) .
(21)
(22)
As initialisation use, e.g., x(0) = Φ† y, i.e. the dirty image.
Remark 3.1. In the analysis form (9), if choosing Ψ such that
Ψ† Ψ 6= I, i.e. an over-complete frame Ψ, then proxλf¯(z̄) can
be computed in an iterative manner:
!
1
1
u(t− 2 )
(t)
† (t)
u(t+ 2 ) = λite (1 − proxλk·k /λ(t) )
+
Ψ
u
, (23)
(t)
1
ite
λite
1
u(t+1) = z̄ − Ψu(t+ 2 ) ,
(24)
(t)
λite
2
where
∈ (0, 2/βPar ) (βPar is a constant satisfying kΨzk2 ≤
βPar kzk , ∀z ∈ RL ) is a predefined step size and u(t) →
proxγ f¯(z̄); refer to Fadili & Starck (2009) and Jacques et al.
(2011) and references therein for details.
3.2
Synthesis
For the synthesis setting (10), set fˆ(a) = µkak1 and ĝ(a) =
ky − ΦΨak22 /2σ 2 . Then
n
o
argmin fˆ(a) + ĝ(a)
(25)
x
3
SPARSE MAP ESTIMATION FOR RI IMAGING
In this section we present the algorithmic details of implementing
the forward-backward splitting algorithm to solve the sparse MAP
can be solved using the forward-backward iteration formula (13),
leading to the iterations
a(i+1) = proxλ(i) fˆ(a(i) − λ(i) ∇ĝ(a(i) )).
(26)
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
We have, ∀ẑ = (ẑ1 , · · · , ẑL ) ∈ RL ,
5
Observed visibilities in RI imaging: y
proxλfˆ(ẑ) = proxλk·k1 (ẑ)
= argmin λµkuk1 + ku − ẑk2 /2
u∈RL
MAP image
estimation: xmap
(27)
Approximate HPD
0
credible regions: Cα
= softλµ (ẑ)
and
†
†
2
∇ĝ(a) = Ψ Φ (ΦΨa − y)/σ .
(28)
Finally, substituting (27) and (28) into (26), the synthesis problem
(10) can be solved iteratively by
a(i+1) = softλ(i) µ a(i) − λ(i) Ψ† Φ† (ΦΨa(i) − y)/σ 2 . (29)
Remark 3.2. Note that in both the analysis and synthesis settings
various terms can be precomputed. For example, in (21) and (28)
the operators Φ† Φ and Ψ† Φ† ΦΨ can be precomputed offline. Similarly, the terms of Φ† y (the so-called dirty map) and Ψ† Φ† y respectively in (21) and (28) can also be precomputed to improve
computation efficiency.
We summarise the forward-backward splitting algorithms
for the analysis and synthesis reconstruction forms in Algorithms 1 and 2. We consider stopping criteria based on a maximum iteration number and when the relative difference between solutions at two consecutive iterations is within some tolerance, i.e., kx(i+1) − x(i) k2 /kx(i) k2 (for Algorithm 1) and
kΨa(i+1) − Ψa(i) k2 /kΨa(i) k2 (for Algorithm 2). The iteration
is terminated when either of the stopping criteria are reached.
Algorithm 1: Forward-backward algorithm for analysis
2
Input: y ∈ RM , x(0) ∈ RN , σ and λ(i) ∈ (0, ∞)
Output: x0
3
do
1
8
update v (i+1) = x(i) − λ(i) Φ† (Φx(i) − y)/σ 2
compute u = Ψ† v (i+1)
update x(i+1) = v (i+1) + Ψ softλ(i) µ (u) − u)
i=i+1
while Stopping criterion is not reached;
9
set x0 = x(i)
4
5
6
7
Algorithm 2: Forward-backward algorithm for synthesis
2
Input: y ∈ RM , a(0) ∈ RL , σ and λ(i) ∈ (0, ∞)
Output: a0
3
do
1
7
compute u = a(i) − λ(i) Ψ† Φ† (ΦΨa(i) − y)/σ 2
update a(i+1) = softλ(i) µ (u)
i=i+1
while Stopping criterion is not reached;
8
set a0 = a(i)
4
5
6
Approximate local credible intervals: (ξ− , ξ+ )
Hypothesis testing
Figure 1. Our proposed uncertainty quantification procedure for RI imaging
based on MAP estimation. The light green areas on the right show the types
of uncertainty quantification developed. Firstly, an image is reconstructed
by MAP estimation using convex optimisation techniques, which scale to
big-data. Then, various forms of uncertainty quantification are performed.
Global approximate Bayesian credible regions are computed. These are then
used to compute local credible intervals (cf. error bars) corresponding to
individual pixels and superpixels and to perform hypothesis testing of image
structure to test whether a structure is physical or an artefact.
4
BAYESIAN UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION:
MAP ESTIMATION
The analysis and synthesis reconstruction models address inverse
problems which are generally ill-conditioned or ill-posed (especially when the measurements are only observed partially or with
limited resolution). Consequently, the corresponding estimators
have significant intrinsic uncertainty that is very challenging to
analyse and quantify. In Pereyra (2016a) a general methodology
was proposed to use MAP estimators to accurately approximate
Bayesian credible regions for p(x|y). These credible regions indicate the regions of the parameter space where most of the posterior
probability mass lies. A remarkable property of the approximation
is that it only requires knowledge of xmap and therefore it can be
computed very efficiently, even in very large-scale problems.
The diagram in Figure 1 shows the main components of our
proposed uncertainty quantification methodology based on MAP
estimation. As is shown, firstly, an image is reconstructed by MAP
estimation. MAP estimation can be computed extremely rapidly
and is therefore ideal for application to big-data. Then, various
forms of uncertainty quantification are performed. Firstly, global
approximate Bayesian credible regions are computed. These are
then used to compute local credible intervals (cf. error bars) corresponding to individual pixels and superpixels. Finally, again using the global approximate Bayesian credible regions, hypothesis
testing of image structure can be performed to test whether a structure is physical or an artefact. For consistency, we adopt the same
notation as in the companion article (Cai et al. 2017).
4.1
Approximate highest posterior density (HPD) credible
regions
The first step in our uncertainty quantification methodology is to
compute a credible region for p(x|y). A posterior credible region
with credible level (1 − α)% is a set Cα ∈ RN that satisfies
Z
p(x ∈ Cα |y) =
p(x|y)1Cα dx = 1 − α,
(30)
x∈RN
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
6
Cai et al.
where 1Cα is the indicator function for Cα , defined by
1Cα (u) = 1 if u ∈ Cα and 0 otherwise. Many regions satisfy the
above property. We focus on the HPD (Highest Posterior Density)
region defined by
Cα := {x : f (x) + g(x) ≤ γα },
(31)
where the threshold γα which defines an isocontour or level-set
of the log-posterior is set such that (30) holds, and we recall
that p(x|y) ∝ exp{−f (x) − g(x)}. This region is decisiontheoretically optimal in the sense of minimum volume (Robert
2001).
Computing HPD credible regions in (31) is difficult because
of the high-dimensional integral in (30). For RI models that are
not too high dimensional, Cα can be computed efficiently by using
proximal MCMC method as described in Cai et al. 2017. However,
this is not possible in big-data settings.
Here we use an approximation of Cα proposed recently in
Pereyra (2016a) for convex inverse problems solved by MAP estimation. The approximation is given by
Cα0 := {x : f (x) + g(x) ≤ γα0 },
(32)
where γα0 is an approximation of the HPD threshold γα given by
√
γα0 = f (xmap ) + g(xmap ) + τα N + N,
(33)
p
with universal constant τα = 16 log(3/α). Recall that N is the
dimension of x and (1 − α)% the credible level considered. After
computing xmap by using modern convex optimisation algorithms,
γα0 can be calculated straightforwardly using (33), even in very high
dimensions. The approximation given in (33) was motivated from
recent results in information theory in terms of a probability concentration inequality (refer to Pereyra 2016a for more details).
For any α ∈ (4exp(−N/3), 1), the error between γα0 and γα
is bounded by the following inequality
√
(34)
0 ≤ γα0 − γα ≤ ηα N + N,
p
p
0
where ηα =
16 log(3/α) + 1/α. Since the error γα − γα
grows at most linearly with respect to N when N is large, the credible region Cα0 associated with γα0 is a stable approximation of Cα .
Moreover, since γα0 − γα ≥ 0 the approximation is theoretically
conservative in the sense that Cα0 overestimates Cα . Precisely, in
the analysis formulation, we first compute the reconstructed image
xmap by using Algorithm 1, and then obtain an approximate HPD
credible region
C̄α0,map := {x : f¯(x) + ḡ(x) ≤ γ̄α0 }
(35)
with
√
γ̄α0 = f¯(xmap ) + ḡ(xmap ) + τα N + N.
(36)
Similarly, in the synthesis setting we compute amap via Algorithm
2, and then construct
Ĉα0,map := {Ψa : fˆ(a) + ĝ(a) ≤ γ̂α0 }
(37)
with
√
γ̂α0 = fˆ(amap ) + ĝ(amap ) + τα N + N.
γ̄α0
γ̂α0
(38)
Note that
and
define the HPD credible regions implicitly.
The HPD credible regions can be used to quantify uncertainties in a variety of manners. In the reminder of this section we describe two such strategies.
4.2
Local credible intervals
The first strategy we propose is a novel approach to compute local credible intervals corresponding to pixels and superpixels, as a
means for quantifying uncertainty spatially at different scales. This
presents a new form of Bayesian uncertainty quantification tailored
for image data and is easy to visualise and interpret. The method
is based on the HPD credible regions discussed above and is applicable for any method for which HPD credible regions can be computed. Here we promote the MAP-based approach, based on the
approximations (36) and (38), and benchmark our results against
the MCMC approach Px-MALA, introduced in Cai et al. (2017).
Let Ω = ∪i Ωi be a partition of the image domain Ω into subsets or superpixels Ωi such that Ωi ∩ Ωj = ∅, i 6= j. The image
domain can be partitioned at different scales, from a single pixel to
larger scales involving blocks of several pixels. To index superpixels we define the index operator ζΩi = (ζ1 , · · · , ζN ) ∈ RN on Ωi ,
which satisfies
(
1, if k ∈ Ωi ,
(39)
ζk =
0, otherwise.
To quantify the uncertainty associated with the region Ωi we calculate the points ξ−,Ωi and ξ+,Ωi that saturate the HPD credible
region Cα0,map from above and from below at Ωi , given by
ξ−,Ωi = min ξ|f (xi,ξ ) + g(xi,ξ ) ≤ γα0 , ∀ξ ∈ [0, +∞) , (40)
ξ
ξ+,Ωi = max ξ|f (xi,ξ ) + g(xi,ξ ) ≤ γα0 , ∀ξ ∈ [0, +∞) , (41)
ξ
where xi,ξ = x∗ (I − ζΩi ) + ξζΩi represents a point estimator
generated by replacing the intensity of x∗ in Ωi by ξ. We recall
that γα0 is the threshold or isocontour level defining Cα0,map . We
then construct the interval (ξ−,Ωi , ξ+,Ωi ) that represents the range
of intensity values ξ of Ωi for which xi,ξ ∈ Cα0,map .
Finally, for visualisation, we gather all the lower and upper
bounds ξ−,Ωi , ξ+,Ωi , ∀i, into the following two images:
X
X
ξ− =
ξ−,Ωi ζΩi , ξ+ =
ξ+,Ωi ζΩi .
(42)
i
i
We typically consider the difference image (ξ+ − ξ− ) that shows
the length of the local credible intervals (cf. error bars). These images can be constructed at different scales to analyse structure of
different sizes. In our experiments, as examples, we consider superpixels of sizes 10 × 10, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 pixels.
4.3
Hypothesis testing of image structure
In a manner akin to the companion article Cai et al. (2017), we
use knock-out posterior tests to assess specific areas or structures
of interest in the reconstructed images. These tests proceed by constructing a surrogate test image x∗,sgt by carefully replacing the
structure of interest in an point estimator x∗ (or Ψa∗ ) with background information. If removing the structure has pushed x∗,sgt
outside of the HPD credible region (i.e. x∗,sgt ∈
/ Cα0,map ), this indicates that the data strongly supports the structure under consideration. Conversely, if x∗,sgt remains inside of the HPD credible
region (i.e. x∗,sgt ∈ Cα0,map ), then the likelihood is insensitive to
the modification, indicating lack of strong evidence for the scrutinised structure.
Algorithmically, a surrogate x∗,sgt for a test area ΩD ⊂ Ω is
generated by performing segmentation-inpainting of x∗ , for example by applying a wavelet filter Λ iteratively by using
x(m+1),sgt = x∗ 1Ω−ΩD + Λ† softλthd (Λx(m),sgt )1ΩD ,
(43)
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
with x(0),sgt = x∗ or x(0),sgt = Ψa∗ for the synthesis formulation (usually 100 iterations are sufficient for convergence). To determine if x∗,sgt ∈ Cα0,map , it suffices to check if
f (x∗,sgt ) + g(x∗,sgt ) ≤ γα0 .
5
(44)
Table 1. CPU time in minutes for the proximal MCMC method Px-MALA
(generating full posterior samples) and MAP-based methods (computing a
point estimator), for the analysis and synthesis models and for test images
of M31, Cygnus A, W28 and 3C288. MAP estimation is approximately 105
times faster than Px-MALA and can be scaled to big-data.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
We now investigate the performance of the proposed uncertainty
quantification methodology for the three strategies discussed in
Section 4. We also report a detailed comparison with the proximal MCMC method Px-MALA, which is one of the MCMC methods introduced in the companion article (Cai et al. 2017) and that
can also support sparsity-promoting priors. Px-MALA produces
(asymptotically) exact inferences and therefore we use it here as
an accurate benchmark for the methods proposed in this article.
5.1
Simulations
In a manner akin to Cai et al. (2017), we perform our experiments
with the following four RI images: M31 galaxy (size 256 × 256),
Cygnus A galaxy (size 256 × 512), W28 supernova remnant (size
256×256), and 3C288 (size 256×256). These images are depicted
in Figure 2 (a) and Figure 3 (a). Radio interferometric observations
are simulated for these ground truth images in a similar manner as
in Cai et al. (2017).
The numerical experiments performed in this article for MAP
estimation were run on a Macbook laptop with an i7 Intel CPU and
memory of 16 GB, running MATLAB R2015b. The Px-MALA algorithm used as a benchmark is significantly more computationally
expensive and required a high-performance workstation (see Cai
et al. 2017). For further details about the experiment setup and the
implementation of Px-MALA please see Cai et al. (2017).
Regarding the models used for the experiments, the `1 regularisation parameter µ in the analysis and synthesis models is set
to 104 and the dictionary Ψ in the analysis and synthesis models
is set to Daubechies 8 wavelets. In Algorithms 1 and 2, we use
λ(i) = 0.5, with stopping criteria set by a maximum iteration number of 500 and relative difference between solutions of 10−4 . In
formulas (36) and (38), the range of values for α is [0.01, 0.99]. In
particular, credible regions and intervals are reported at α = 0.01,
corresponding to the 99% credible level. The maximum number of
iterations for segmented-inpainting in (43) is set to 200.
5.2
Image reconstruction
As the first step in our analysis we perform Bayesian image reconstruction for the four images considered. Precisely, for each
image we compute two Bayesian estimators, the MAP estimator
computed by convex optimisation and the sample mean estimator
computed with Px-MALA. For completeness, we consider both the
analysis and the synthesis models (9) and (10).
The Bayesian estimators related to the analysis model are
shown in Figures 2 and 3. Observe that both estimators produce similar, excellent reconstruction results. For comparison, dirty
maps (reconstructed by applying the inverse Fourier transform directly to the visibilities) of the test images are shown in Figure 2 (b)
and Figure 3 (b). As expected, the results of the analysis and synthesis models (9) and (10) under an orthogonal basis Ψ are nearly
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
7
CPU time (min)
Analysis
Synthesis
Images
Methods
M31 (Fig. 2 )
Px-MALA
MAP
1307
.03
944
.02
Cygnus A (Fig. 3 )
Px-MALA
MAP
2274
.07
1762
.04
W28 (Fig. 3 )
Px-MALA
MAP
1122
.06
879
.04
3C288 (Fig. 3 )
Px-MALA
MAP
1144
.03
881
.02
undistinguishable6 (see results for M31 in Figure 2; to avoid redundancy the results for the other images are not reported here).
For this reason, in the reminder of this article only the results for
the analysis model are presented.
We emphasise again that MAP estimators computed by convex optimisation are significantly faster to compute than the estimators that require MCMC methods. In particular, in our experiments
there is a gain of order 105 in terms of computation time (see Table 1 for the computation time comparisons with Px-MALA). Furthermore, MAP estimation based on convex optimisation supports
algorithmic structures that can be highly distributed (e.g. Carrillo
et al. 2014; Onose et al. 2016) to further assist in scaling to bigdata. MCMC algorithms cannot typically be distributed to such a
high degree. We have not yet considered distributed MAP algorithms here; our MAP-based methods therefore provide additional
performance improvements over MCMC beyond the already dramatic improvements shown in Table 1.
5.3
Approximate HPD credible regions
We compute the HPD credible regions for the four images considered. Precisely, we use formulas (36) and (38) to approximate the
threshold or isocontour value γα0 defining the HPD regions for the
analysis and synthesis models (recall that these are highly efficient
approximations derived from the MAP estimates xmap and amap ).
Figure 4 shows the threshold values obtained for each image and
model, for α ∈ [0.01, 0.99]; observe again that the results of the
analysis and synthesis models are consistent with each other, as expected.
To assess the approximation error involved in using (36) and
(38) instead of an MCMC method, we also computed the HPD
threshold values using the Px-MALA algorithm which is asymptotically exact (cf. Cai et al. 2017, Figure 6). Recall than Px-MALA is
several orders of magnitude more computationally expensive than
MAP estimation (see Table 1). This comparison revealed approximation errors of between 1% and 5% over all cases, which is in
close agreement with the results reported in Pereyra (2016a). These
experiments confirm that the MAP-based approximations (36) and
Note that, when Ψ† Ψ = I, as considered here, the analysis and synthesis
models are identical. However, when Ψ† Ψ 6= I, they are very different and
we expect different reconstructed images.
6
8
Cai et al.
(a) ground truth
(b) dirty map
(c) Px-MALA for analysis model
(d) MAP for analysis model
(e) Px-MALA for synthesis model
(f) MAP for synthesis model
Figure 2. Image reconstructions for M31 (size 256 × 256). All images are shown in log10 scale. (a): ground truth; (b): dirty image (reconstructed by inverse
Fourier transform); (c) and (d): point estimators for the analysis model (9) computed by Px-MALA and MAP estimation, respectively; (e) and (f): the same as
(c) and (d) but for the synthesis model (10). In particular, the point estimators of Px-MALA are the sample mean. Clearly, consistent results between Px-MALA
and MAP estimation and between the analysis and synthesis models are obtained.
(a) ground truth
(b) dirty map
(c) Px-MALA for analysis model
(d) MAP for analysis model
Figure 3. Image reconstructions for Cygnus A (size 256 × 512), W28 (size 256 × 256), and 3C288 (size 256 × 256) radio galaxies (first to third rows). All
images are shown in log10 scale. First column: (a) ground truth. Second to forth columns: (b) dirty images; (c) and (d) point estimators for the analysis model
(9) computed by Px-MALA and MAP estimation, respectively. Clearly, consistent results between Px-MALA and MAP estimation are obtained.
(38) deliver accurate estimates of the HPD credible regions with a
dramatically lower computational cost.
5.4
Approximate local credible intervals
We use the approximate HPD regions to calculate local credible
intervals for image superpixels. Precisely, Figures 5–8 report the
length of local credible intervals for the four test images for superpixel grid sizes of 10 × 10, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 pixels, computed
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
1−α
(a) M31
1−α
(b) Cygnus A
1−α
(c) W28
9
1−α
(d) 3C288
MAP
Px-MALA
0 and γ̂ 0 computed using MAP-based methods, for test images (a) M31, (b) Cygnus A, (c) W28, and (d)
Figure 4. HPD credible region isocontour levels γ̄α
α
3C288. In particular, MAP-ana (resp. MAP-syn) represents the results by MAP estimation for the analysis (resp. synthesis) model. Note that the red line in
plot (d) is overlaid by the blue line and thus may not be visible, due to the high degree of similarity between the two results. In all cases the results of the
analysis and synthesis models are in close agreement.
(a) point estimators
(b) local credible interval length
grid size 10 × 10 pixels
(c) local credible interval length
grid size 20 × 20 pixels
(d) local credible interval length
grid size 30 × 30 pixels
MAP
Px-MALA
Figure 5. Length of local credible intervals (99% credible level), cf. error bars, computed for M31 for the analysis model (9). First column: (a) point estimators.
Second to fourth columns: (b)–(d) local credible intervals at grid sizes of 10 × 10, 20 × 20, and 30 × 30 pixels, respectively. First row gives exact inferences
computed with the MCMC method Px-MALA (Cai et al. 2017). Second row gives MAP-based approximate inferences computed by convex optimisation.
Clearly, MAP-based approximations provide estimates of the length of local credible intervals (cf. error bars) that are extremely consistent with the ones
obtained by Px-MALA, while the MAP estimates can be computed several orders of magnitude more rapidly (Table 1). Moreover, the length of the approximate
credible intervals computed by the MAP-based approach are theoretically conservative and can be seen to slightly overestimate the lengths computed by
MCMC sampling).
(a) point estimators
(b) local credible interval length
grid size 10 × 10 pixels
(c) local credible interval length
grid size 20 × 20 pixels
Figure 6. Same as Figure 5 but for Cygnus A.
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
(d) local credible interval length
grid size 30 × 30 pixels
Cai et al.
MAP
Px-MALA
10
(a) point estimators
(b) local credible interval length
grid size 10 × 10 pixels
(c) local credible interval length
grid size 20 × 20 pixels
(d) local credible interval length
grid size 30 × 30 pixels
MAP
Px-MALA
Figure 7. Same as Figure 5 but for W28.
(a) point estimators
(b) local credible interval length
grid size 10 × 10 pixels
(c) local credible interval length
grid size 20 × 20 pixels
(d) local credible interval length
grid size 30 × 30 pixels
Figure 8. Same as Figure 5 but for 3C288.
w.r.t. the analysis model (the results for the synthesis model are
very similar). For comparison, Figures 5–8 also show the exact estimates obtained by Px-MALA based on its posterior sample mean.
We conclude the main observations as follows. Firstly, the results obtained with both approaches are extremely consistent with
each other, indicating that the approximate credible intervals derived from the MAP estimation are very accurate. Secondly, the
length of the approximate local credible intervals computed by
MAP estimation are theoretically conservative and can be seen to
slightly overestimate the lengths computed by MCMC sampling,
and so are trustworthy. Thirdly, note that (i) coarser scales have
shorter credible intervals than narrower scales, and (ii) superpixels
at object boundaries generally have longer credible intervals than
superpixels in homogenous regions. These two observations are direct consequences of the fact that there is more uncertainty about
high-frequency image components because of the sampling profile
associated with the measurement operator Φ, which mainly covers
low frequencies (see Cai et al. 2017, Figure 2).
5.5
Hypothesis testing of image structure
We conclude our experimental results by demonstrating our
methodology for testing structure in reconstructed images. We consider the same images and structures of interest as in Cai et al.
(2017), shown in the yellow rectangular areas in the first column
of Figure 9. All of these structures are physical (i.e. present in the
ground truth images), except for structure 2 in 3C288 which is a
reconstruction artefact.
Recall that the methodology proceeds as follows. First, we
construct a surrogate image x∗,sgt by modifying the MAP estiMNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
11
Table 2. Hypothesis test results for test structures shown in Figure 9 for M31, Cygnus A, W28, and 3C288. Note that γα represents the isocontour defining
the HPD credible region at credible level (1 − α), where here α = 0.01, x∗,sgt represents the surrogate generated from point estimator x∗ (in particular, for
Px-MALA x∗ is the sample mean of the MCMC samples), and (f + g)(·) represents the objective function; symbols with labels ¯ and ˆ are related to the
analysis model (9) and the synthesis model (10), respectively. Symbol 7 indicates that the test area is artificial (and no strong statistical statement can be made
as to the area), while 3 indicates that the test area is physical. All values are in units 106 . Clearly, both Px-MALA and MAP estimation give convincing and
consistent hypothesis test results. Note that MAP estimation is dramatically more computationally efficient that Px-MALA (Table 1).
Images
Test
areas
Ground
truth
Method
(f¯ + ḡ)(x̄∗,sgt )
Isocontour
γ̄0.01
(fˆ + ĝ)(Ψ† x̂∗,sgt )
Isocontour
γ̂0.01
Hypothesis
test
M31 (Fig. 9 )
1
3
Px-MALA
MAP
2.44
2.29
2.34
2.25
2.43
2.29
2.34
2.25
3
3
Cygnus A (Fig. 9 )
1
3
Px-MALA
MAP
1.17
1.02
1.26
1.14
1.18
1.02
1.27
1.14
7
7
W28 (Fig. 9 )
1
3
Px-MALA
MAP
3.38
3.47
1.84
1.89
3.37
3.47
1.85
1.89
3
3
1
3
2
7
Px-MALA
MAP
Px-MALA
MAP
3.27
3.11
1.971
1.844
2.02
1.91
2.027
1.912
3.25
3.11
1.954
1.844
2.01
1.91
2.010
1.912
3
3
7
7
3C288 (Fig. 9 )
mator xmap to remove the structure of interest via segmentationinpaiting, computed using formula (43). Each structure is assessed individually. Second, we check if x∗,sgt ∈
/ Cα0,map (i.e. if
f (x∗,sgt ) + g(x∗,sgt ) > γα0 ) to determine whether there exists
strong evidence in favour of the structure considered. Conclusions
are generally not highly sensitive to the exact value of α; here we
report results for α = 0.01 related to a 99% credible level. The
resulting surrogate images are displayed in the second column of
Figure 9.
The results of these tests are shown in Table 2. For comparison, we also include the results obtained with the reference method
Px-MALA (Cai et al. 2017). Again, the two methods produce excellent results that are consistent with each other. From Table 2, we
observe that the methods have correctly classified the three main
physical structures of M31, W28, and 3C288, and correctly identified the minor structure of 3C288 as a potential reconstruction
artefact. Moreover, the methods have found that it is not possible to
make a strong statistical statement about the small physical structure in image Cygnus A, which is difficult because it is only a few
pixels in size, isolated, and significantly weaker in intensity than
the other structures in the image.
Before closing this section, we emphasise again that the methods presented in this article deliver a variety of forms of uncertainty
quantification with a very low computational cost. While these new
forms of uncertainty quantification can also be achieved by using
state-of-the-art proximal MCMC methods, such as Px-MALA and
MYULA, as presented in the companion article Cai et al. (2017),
MCMC techniques cannot scale to massive data sizes. Nevertheless, they are useful for medium-scale problems and provide accurate benchmarks for the highly efficient methods presented herein,
which will scale very well to the emerging big-data era of radio
astronomy.
6
CONCLUSIONS
Uncertainty quantification is an important missing component in RI
imaging that will only become increasingly important as the bigdata era of radio interferometry emerges. No existing RI imaging
techniques that are used in practice (e.g. CLEAN, MEM or CS approaches) provide uncertainty quantification. In this article, as an
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
alternative to MCMC methods, such as Px-MALA and MYULA
that were presented in Cai et al. (2017), we present new uncertainty
quantification methods based on MAP estimation by convex optimisation. The proposed uncertainty quantification methods exhibit
extremely fast computation speeds and allow uncertainty quantification to be performed practically and in a manner that will scale
to the emerging big-data era of RI imaging.
Our proposed methods, which inherit the advantages of convex optimisation methods, are much more efficient than proximal
MCMC methods that explore the entire posterior distribution of the
image. Note, however, that the methods proposed here give an approximation of HPD credible regions and, consequently, the additional forms of uncertainty quantification that are built on the approximate HPD credible regions are also approximate. Nevertheless, we show these approximations are very accurate. Moreover,
the approximations are conservative so that uncertainties are not
underestimated. In contrast, proximal MCMC methods can theoretically provide HPD credible regions and other forms of uncertainty
quantification that are more accurate. Therefore, the proposed fast
MAP-based methods and the proximal MCMC methods complement each other, rather than being mutually exclusive. We anticipate that when it comes to the big-data era, we will use predominantly fast uncertainty quantification methods such as those based
on MAP estimation, and reserve MCMC methods for benchmarking and detailed comparison.
A variety of forms of uncertainty quantification for MAP estimation were constructed, including HPD credible regions, local
credible intervals (cf. error bars) for individual pixels and superpixels, and tests for image structure. Our methods were evaluated on
four test images that are representative in RI imaging. These experiments demonstrated that our MAP-based methods exhibit excellent performance and can reconstruct images with sharp detail.
Moreover, they simultaneously underpin highly accurate approximate techniques to quantify uncertainties. In terms of computation
time, MAP techniques were found to be approximately 105 times
faster than state-of-the-art proximal MCMC methods, even when
MAP estimation is run on a standard laptop and proximal MCMC
methods on a high-performance workstation. Moreover, they lead
to algorithmic structures that can be highly distributed and parallelised.
In the near future we will consider alternative approaches to
12
Cai et al.
M31
tations and data. It is our hope that uncertainty quantification, e.g.
in the form of recovering error bars (Bayesian credible intervals)
and hypothesis testing of image structure, will become an important standard component in RI imaging for statistically principled
and robust scientific inquiry. For the first time, we propose techniques for the practical quantification of uncertainties in RI imaging. These techniques can be applied not only to observations made
by existing telescopes but also to the emerging big-data era of radio
astronomy.
W28
Cygnus A
1
1
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is supported by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) by grant EP/M011089/1,
and Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC)
ST/M00113X/1.
1
REFERENCES
3C288
2
1
(a) MAP point estimators
(b) inpainted surrogate
Figure 9. Hypothesis testing for M31, Cygnus A, W28, and 3C288. The five
structures depicted in yellow are considered, all of which are physical (i.e.
present in the ground truth images), except for structure 2 in 3C288, which
is a reconstruction artefact. First column (a): point estimators obtained by
MAP estimation for the analysis model (9) (shown in log10 scale). Second
column (b): segmented-inpainted surrogate test images with information
in the yellow rectangular areas removed and replaced by inpainted background (shown in log10 scale). Hypothesis testing is then performed to test
whether the structure considered is physical by checking whether the surrogate test images shown in (b) fall outside of the HPD credible regions.
Results of these hypothesis tests are specified in Table 2. Note that for the
case shown in the last row the structures within areas 1 and 2 are tested
independently.
perform hypothesis testing of image structure. For example, substructure can be tested by creating surrogate test images with the
substructure in question removed, for example by smoothing the
corresponding region. Such an approach would be valuable for improving our understanding of the astrophysical processes involved
in radio galaxies, for example in the processes governing radio jets.
Most importantly, we plan to apply the uncertainty quantification techniques presented in this article to RI observations acquired
by a variety of different telescopes and to make the methods publicly available. The methods will be implemented in the existing
PURIFY7 package for RI imaging. Furthermore, novel algorithms
will be developed to implement our methods with improved computational efficiency and to highly distribute and parallelise compu-
7
https://github.com/basp-group/purify
Ables J. G., 1974, A&AS, 15, 383
Bauschke H. H., Combettes P. L., 2011, Convex Analysis and Monotone
Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces. Springer-Verlag
Bhatnagar S., Corwnell T. J., 2004, A&A, 426, 747
Cai X., Pereyra M., McEwen J. D., 2017, preprint (arXiv:??)
Carrillo R. E., McEwen J. D., Wiaux Y., 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1223
Carrillo R. E., McEwen J. D., Wiaux Y., 2014, MNRAS, 439, 3591
Combettes P. L., Pesquet J. C., 2010, arXiv:0912.3522v4
Combettes P. L., Wajs V. R., 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul., 4, 1168
Cornwell T. J., 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing,
2, 793
Cornwell T. J., Evans K. F., 1985, A&A, 143, 77
Dabbech A., Ferrari C., Mary D., Slezak E., Smirnov O., Kenyon J. S.,
2015, A&A, 576, A7
Dabbech A., Wolz L., Pratley L., McEwen J. D., Wiaux Y., 2017,
arXiv:1702.05009
Durmus A., Moulines E., Pereyra M., 2016, arXiv:1612.07471v1
Fadili M. J., Starck J. L., 2009, in ICIP.
Garsden H., et al., 2015, A&A, 575, A90
Green P. J., Łatuszyński K., Pereyra M., Robert C. P., 2015, Statistics and
Computing, 25, 835
Greiner M., Vacca V., Junklewitz H., Enßlin T. A., 2017,
arXiv:1605.04317v2
Gull S. F., Daniell G. J., 1978, Nature, 272, 686
Högbom J. A., 1974, A&AS, 15, 417
Jacques L., Hammond D., Fadili M., 2011, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 57, 559
Junklewitz H., Bell M. R., Selig M., Enßlin T. A., 2016, IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, 586, A76
Kartik S. V., Carrillo R. E., Thiran J.-P., Y. W., 2017, Springer, New-York,
468, 2382
Li F., Cornwell T. J., de Hoog F., 2011a, A&A, 528, A31
Li F., Brown S., Cornwell T. J., de Hoog F., 2011b, A&A, 531, A126
McEwen J. D., Wiaux Y., 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1318
Moreau J. J., 1965, Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 93, 273
Onose A., Carrillo R. E., Repetti A., McEwen J. D., Thiran J. P., Pesquet
J. C., Wiaux Y., 2016, MNRAS, 462, 4314
Onose A., Dabbech A., Wiaux Y., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 938
Pereyra M., 2015, Statistics and Computing
Pereyra M., 2016a, SIAM J. Imaging Sciences
Pereyra M., 2016b, preprint, (arXiv:1612.06149)
Pratley L., McEwen J. D., d’Avezac M., Carrillo R. E., Onose A., Wiaux
Y., 2016, preprint (arXiv:1610.02400)
Rau U., Bhatnagar S., Voronkov M. A., Cornwell T. J., 2009, in Proc. IEEE.
pp 1472–1481
Robert C. P., 2001, Springer Verlag, New-York
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
Uncertainty quantification for RI imaging II
Ryle M., Hewish A., 1960, MNRAS, 120, 220
Ryle M., Vonberg D. D., 1946, Nature, 158, 339
Stewart I. M., Fenech D. M., Muxlow T. W. B., 2011, A&A, 535, A81
Sutter P. M., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 768
Thompson A., Moran J., Swenson G., 2008, Interferometry and Synthesis
in Radio Astronomy. Wiley, https://books.google.co.uk/
books?id=S99Z7kNBYzAC
Wiaux Y., Jacques L., Puy G., Scaife A. M. M., Vandergheynst P., 2009a,
MNRAS, 395, 1733
Wiaux Y., Puy G., Boursier Y., Vandergheynst P., 2009b, MNRAS, 400,
1029
Wolz L., McEwen J. D., Abdalla F. B., Carrillo R. E., Wiaux Y., 2013,
MNRAS, 436, 1993
MNRAS 000, 1–13 (2017)
13
| 7cs.IT
|
Soft + Hardwired Attention: An LSTM Framework for
Human Trajectory Prediction and Abnormal Event
Detection
arXiv:1702.05552v1 [cs.CV] 18 Feb 2017
Tharindu Fernandoa,∗, Simon Denmana , Sridha Sridharana , Clinton Fookesa
a Image
and Video Research Laboratory, SAIVT,
Queensland University of Technology,
Australia.
Abstract
As humans we possess an intuitive ability for navigation which we master through
years of practice; however existing approaches to model this trait for diverse tasks
including monitoring pedestrian flow and detecting abnormal events have been limited by using a variety of hand-crafted features. Recent research in the area of deeplearning has demonstrated the power of learning features directly from the data; and
related research in recurrent neural networks has shown exemplary results in sequenceto-sequence problems such as neural machine translation and neural image caption
generation. Motivated by these approaches, we propose a novel method to predict
the future motion of a pedestrian given a short history of their, and their neighbours,
past behaviour. The novelty of the proposed method is the combined attention model
which utilises both “soft attention” as well as “hard-wired” attention in order to map
the trajectory information from the local neighbourhood to the future positions of the
pedestrian of interest. We illustrate how a simple approximation of attention weights
(i.e hard-wired) can be merged together with soft attention weights in order to make
our model applicable for challenging real world scenarios with hundreds of neighbours. The navigational capability of the proposed method is tested on two challenging
publicly available surveillance databases where our model outperforms the currentstate-of-the-art methods. Additionally, we illustrate how the proposed architecture can
∗ Corresponding
author
Email address: [email protected]. (Tharindu Fernando )
Preprint submitted to Neural Networks
February 21, 2017
be directly applied for the task of abnormal event detection without handcrafting the
features.
Keywords: human trajectory prediction, social navigation, deep feature learning,
attention models.
1. Introduction
Understanding and predicting crowd behaviour in complex real world scenarios has
a vast number of applications, from designing intelligent security systems to deploying
socially-aware robots. Despite significant interest from researchers in domains such as
5
abnormal event detection, traffic flow estimation and behaviour prediction; accurately
modelling and predicting crowd behaviour has remained a challenging problem due to
its complex nature.
As humans we possess an intuitive ability for navigation which we master through
years of practice; and as such these complex dynamics cannot be captured with only a
10
handful of hand-crafted features. We believe that directly learning from the trajectories
of pedestrians of interest (i.e. pedestrian who’s trajectory we seek to predict) along
with their neighbours holds the key to modelling the natural ability for navigation we
posses.
The approach we present in this paper can be viewed as a data driven approach
15
which learns the relationship between neighbouring trajectories in an unsupervised
manner. Our approach is motivated by the recent success of deep learning approaches
(Goroshin et al. (2015); Madry et al. (2014); Lai et al. (2014)) in unsupervised feature
learning for classification and regression tasks.
1.1. Problem Definition
The problem we have addressed can be defined as follows: Assume that each frame
in our dataset is first preprocessed such that we have obtained the spatial coordinates
of each pedestrian at every time frame. Therefore the trajectory of the ith pedestrian
for the time period of 1 to Tobs can be defined as,
xi = [x1 , y1 , . . . , xTobs , yTobs ].
2
(1)
Figure 1: A sample surveillance scene (on the left): The trajectory of the pedestrian of interest is shown in
green, and has two neighbours (shown in purple) to the left, one in front and none on right. Neighbourhood
encoding scheme (on the right): Trajectory information is encoded with LSTM encoders. A soft attention
context vector Cts is used to embed the trajectory information from the pedestrian of interest, and a hardwired
attention context vector C h is used for neighbouring trajectories. In order to generate Cts we use a soft
attention function denoted at in the above figure, and the hardwired weights are denoted by w. The merged
context vector is then used to predict the future trajectory for the pedestrian of interest (shown in red).
20
The task we are interested in is predicting the trajectory of the ith pedestrian for the
period of Tobs+1 to Tpred , having observed the trajectory of the ith pedestrian from time
1 to Tobs as well as the trajectories all the other pedestrians in the local neighbourhood
during that period. This can be considered a sequence to sequence prediction problem
where the input sequence captures contextual information corresponding to the spatial
25
location of the pedestrian of interest and their neighbours, and the output sequence
contains the predicted future path of the pedestrian of interest.
1.2. Proposed Solution
To solve this problem we propose a novel architecture as illustrated in Fig. 1.
For encoding and decoding purposes we utilise Long-Short Term Memory networks
30
(LSTM) due to their recent success in sequence to sequence prediction (Bahdanau
et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Yoo et al., 2015). We demonstrate the social navigational
capability of the proposed method on two challenging publicly available surveillance
3
databases. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of learning the common patterns in human navigation behaviour, and achieves improved predictions for pedestri35
ans paths over the current state-of-the-art methodologies. Furthermore, an application
of the proposed method for abnormal human behaviour detection is shown in Section
5.
2. Related Work
2.1. Trajectory Clustering
40
When considering approaches for learning motion patterns through clustering, Giannotti et al. (2007) have proposed the concept of “trajectory patterns”, which represents the descriptions of frequent behaviours in terms of space and time. They have
analysed GPS traces of a fleet of 273 trucks comprising a total of 112,203 points. Deviating from discovering common trajectories, Lee et al. (2007) proposed to discover
45
common sub-trajectories using a partition-and-group framework. The framework partitions each trajectory into a set of line segments, and forms clusters by grouping similar
line segments based on density. Morris and Trivedi (2009) evaluated different similarity measures and clustering methodologies to uncover their strengths and weaknesses
for trajectory clustering. With reference to their findings, the clustering method had
50
little effect on the quality of the results achieved; however selecting the appropriate
distance measures with respect to the properties of the trajectories in the dataset had
great influence on final performance.
2.2. Human Behaviour Prediction
When predicting human behaviour the most common motion models are social
55
force models (Helbing and Molnár, 1995; Koppula and Saxena, 2013; Pellegrini et al.,
2010; Yamaguchi et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2012) which generate attractive and repulsive
forces between pedestrians. Several variants of such approaches exist. Alahi et al.
(2014) represents it as a social affinity feature by learning the pedestrian trajectories
with relative positions where as Yi et al. (2015a) observed the behaviour of stationary
60
crowd groups in order to understand crowd behaviour. With the aid of topic models the
4
authors in Wang et al. (2008) were able to learn motion patterns in crowd behaviour
without tracking objects. This approach was extended to incorporate spatio-temporal
dependencies in Hospedales et al. (2009) and Emonet et al. (2011).
Deviating from the above approaches, a mixture model of dynamic pedestrian
65
agents is presented by Zhou et al. (2015), who also consider the temporal ordering
of the observations. Yet, this model ignores the interactions among agents, a key factor
when predicting behaviour in real world scenarios.
The main drawback in all of the above methods is that they utilise hand-crafted
features to model human behaviour and interactions. Hand-crafted features may only
70
capture abstract level semantics of the environment and they are heavily dependent on
the domain knowledge that we posses.
In Alahi et al. (2016) an unsupervised feature learning approach was proposed.
The authors have generated multiple LSTMs for each pedestrian in the scene at that
particular time frame. They have observed the position of all the pedestrians from time
75
1 to Tobs and predicted all of their positions for the period Tobs+1 to Tpred .
They have pooled the hidden states of the immediately preceding time step for the
neighbouring pedestrians when generating their positions in the current time step. A
more detailed comparison of this model with our proposed model is presented in Sec.
3.3
80
2.3. Attention Models
Attention-based mechanisms are motivated by the notion that, instead of decoding
based on the encoding of a single element or fixed-length part of the input sequence,
one can attend a specific area (or important areas) of the whole input sequence to generate the next output. Importantly, we let the model learn what to attend to based on
85
the input sequence and what it has produced so far.
In Bahdanau et al. (2014) have shown that attention-based RNN models are useful
for aligning input and output word sequences for neural machine translation. This was
followed by the works by Xu et al. (2015) and Yao et al. (2015) for image and video
captioning respectively. According to Sharma et al. (2015), attention based models
90
can be broadly categorised into soft attention and hard attention models, based on the
5
method that it uses to learn the attention weights. Soft attention models (Bahdanau
et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2015; Sharma et al., 2015) can be viewed as
“supervised” guiding mechanisms which learn the alignment between input and output sequences through backpropagation. Hard attention (Mnih et al., 2014; Williams,
95
1992) is used by Reinforcement Learning to predict an approximate location to focus
on. With reference to Sharma et al. (2015), learning hard attention models can become
computationally expensive as it requires sampling.
Still, soft aligning multiple feature sequences is computationally inefficient as we
need to calculate an attention value for each combination of input and output elements.
100
This is feasible in cases such as neural machine translation where we have a 50-word
input sequence and generate a 50-word output sequence, but prohibitively expensive
in a surveillance setting when a target has hundreds of neighbours, and we have to
learn the attention weight values for all possible value combinations for each of the
neighbouring trajectories. We tackle this problem via the merging of soft attention and
105
hardwired attention in our framework.
3. Proposed Approach
3.1. LSTM Encoder-Decoder Framework
In contrast to past attention models (Bahdanau et al., 2014; Xu et al., 2015) which
align a single input sequence with an output sequence, we need to consider multiple
110
feature sequences in the form of trajectory information from the pedestrian of interest
and their neighbours when predicting the output sequence. Aligning all features together is not optimal as they have different degrees of influence (i.e. a person walking
directly next to the target has greater influence than a person several meters away). Soft
attention models are deterministic models which are trained using back-propagation.
115
Therefore, aligning each input trajectory sequence separately via a separate soft attention model is computationally expensive.
We show that we can overcome this problem with a set of hardwired weights which
we calculate based on the distance between each neighbour and the pedestrian of interest. When considering navigation, as distance is the key factor which determines the
6
yi,t-1
yi,t
St-1
St
Decoder
Cx*t
Cst
at,1
Encoder
h1
h2
at,2 at,3
at,T
h3
xi,1 xi,2 xi,3
Pedestrian of interest
hT
xi,t
Ch
w1,1 w1,2 w1,T
h’1,1
h’1,2
x1,1 x1,2
wj,1
h’1,T
x1,t
Neighbour 1
wj,2
…
wj,T
h’j,1
h’j,2
xj,1
xj,2
h’j,T
xj,t
Neighbour j
Figure 2: The proposed Soft + Hardwired Attention model. We utilise the trajectory information from both
the pedestrian of interest and the neighbouring trajectories. We embed the trajectory information from the
pedestrian of interest with the soft attention context vector Cts , while neighbouring trajectories are embedded
with the aid of a hardwired attention context vector C h . In order to generate Cts we use a soft attention
function denoted at in the above figure, and the hardwired weights are denoted by w. Then the merged
context vector, Ct∗ , is used to predict the future state yi(t)
120
neighbour’s influence, it acts as a good generalisation.
The proposed LSTM Encoder-Decoder framework is shown in Fig. 2. Due to its
computational complexities, soft attention (denoted at in Fig. 2) is used only when
embedding the trajectory information from the pedestrian of interest. We show that
by approximating the required attention for the neighbours through hardwired atten-
125
tion weights (wj ), which we calculate based on the distance between the neighbouring
pedestrian and the pedestrian of interest, we can generate a good approximation of their
influence. The methodology of generating soft and hardwired attentions is outlined in
the following subsections.
3.1.1. LSTM Encoder
In a general Encoder-Decoder framework, an encoder recieves an input sequence x
from which it generates an encoded sequence h. In the context of this paper, the input
7
sequence for the pedestrian i is given in Equation 1 and the encoded sequence is given
by,
hi = [h1 , . . . , hT ].
(2)
The encoding function is an LSTM, which can be denoted by,
ht = LSTM(xt , ht−1 ).
130
(3)
With the aid of above equation we encode the trajectory information from the pedestrian of interest as well as each trajectory in the local neighbourhood.
3.1.2. LSTM Decoder
Before considering how the combine context vector Ct∗ is formulated, the concept
of time dependent context vector can be illustrated as follows. For a general case, let
st−1 be the decoder hidden state at time t − 1, yt−1 be the decoder output at time t − 1,
Ct be the context vector at time t and f be the decoding function. The decoder output
at time t is given by,
yt = f (st−1 , yt−1 , Ct ),
(4)
as defined by Bahdanau et al. (2014) such that distinct context vectors are given for
each time instant. The context vector depends on the encoded input sequence h =
135
[h1 , . . . , ht ].
In the proposed approach, the given trajectory (i.e x = [x1 , y1 , . . . , xTobs , yTobs ])
for the pedestrian of interest is encoded and used to generate a soft attention context
vector, Cts . With the aid of distinct context vectors we are able to focus different
degrees of attention towards different parts of the input sequence, when predicting the
output sequence. The soft attention context vector Cts can be computed as a weighted
sum of hidden states,
Cts =
T
obs
X
αtj hj .
(5)
j=1
In Bahdanau et al. (2014), the authors have shown that the weight αtj can be computed
by,
exp(etj )
αtj = PT
,
k=1 exp(etk )
8
(6)
etj = a(st−1 , hj ),
(7)
and the function a is a feed forward neural network for joint training with other components of the system.
As an extension to the decoder model proposed in Bahdanau et al. (2014), we have
added a set of hardwired weights which we use to generate hardwired attention (C h ).
140
Utilising the hardwired attention model we combine the encoded hidden states of the
neighbouring trajectories in the local neighbourhood.
Hardwired attention weights are designed to incorporate the notion of distance between the pedestrian of interest and his or her neighbours into the trajectory prediction
model. The closer a neighbouring pedestrian, the higher their associated weight, be-
145
cause that pedestrian has a greater influence on the trajectory that we are trying to
predict.
The simplest representation scheme can be given by,
1
w(n,j) =
,
dist(n, j)
(8)
where dist(n, j) is the distance between the nth neighbour and the pedestrian of interest at the j th time instance, and w(n,j) is the generated hardwired attention weight.
This idea can be extended to generate the context vector for the hardwired attention
150
model.
0
Let there be N neighbouring trajectories in the local neighbourhood and h(n,j) be
the encoded hidden state of the nth neighbour at the j th time instance, then the context
vector for the hardwired attention model is defined as,
Ch =
N T
obs
X
X
0
w(n,j) h(n,j) .
(9)
n=1 j=1
We then employ a simple concatenation layer to combine the information from
individual attentions. Hence the combined context vector can be denoted as,
Ct∗ = tanh(Wc [Cts ; C h ]),
(10)
where Wc is referred to as the set of weights for concatenation. We learn this weight
value also through back-propagation.
9
The final prediction can now be computed as,
yt = LSTM(st−1 , yt−1 , Ct∗ ),
(11)
where the decoding function f in Eq. 4 is replaced with a LSTM decoder as we are
employing LSTMs for encoding and decoding purposes.
155
3.2. Model Learning
The given input trajectories in the training set are clustered based on source and
sink positions and we run an outlier detection algorithm for each cluster considering
the entire trajectory. For clustering we used DBSCAN (Ester et al. (1996)) as it enables
us to cluster the data on the fly without specifying the number of clusters. Hyper
160
parameters of the DBSCAN algorithm were chosen experimentally.
In the training phase trajectories are clustered based on the entire trajectory and
after clustering we learnt a separate trajectory prediction model for each generated
cluster. When modelling the local neighbourhood of the pedestrians of interest, we
have encoded the trajectories of those closest 10 neighbours in each direction, namely
165
front, left and right. If there exist more than 10 neighbours in any direction, we have
taken the first (closest) 9 trajectories and the mean trajectory of the rest of the neighbours. If a trajectory has less than 10 neighbours, we create dummy trajectories such
that we have 10 neighbours, and set the weight of these dummy neighbours to 0.
When testing the model, we are concerned with predicting the pedestrian trajectory
170
given the first Tobs locations. To select the appropriate prediction model to use, the
mean trajectory for each cluster for the period of 1 to Tobs is generated and in the
testing phase, the given trajectories are assigned to the closest cluster centre while
considering those mean trajectories as the cluster centroids.
3.3. Comparison to the Social-LSTM model of Alahi et al. (2016)
In this section we draw comparisons between the current state-of-the-art technique
and the proposed approach. In Alahi et al. (2016), for each neighbouring pedestrian,
the hidden state at time t−1 is extracted out and fed as an input to the prediction model
of the pedestrian of interest. Let there be N neighbours in the local neighbourhood and
10
0
h(n,t−1) be the hidden state of the nth neighbour at the time instance t − 1. Then the
process can be written as,
0
Ht =
N
X
0
h(n,t−1) ,
(12)
n=1
and the hidden state of the pedestrian of interest at the tth time instance is given by,
0
ht = LSTM(ht−1 , xt−1 , Ht ),
175
(13)
where ht−1 refers to the hidden state and xt−1 refers to the position of the pedestrian
0
of interest at the t − 1 time instance. The authors are passing Ht and xt−1 through
embedding functions before feeding it to the LSTM model, but in order to draw direct
comparisons we are using the above notation. In Alahi et al. (2016), the hidden state of
the pedestrian of interest at the tth time instance depends only on his or her previous
180
hidden state, the position in the previous time instance and the pooled hidden state of
the immediately preceding time step for the neighbouring pedestrians (see Eq. 13).
Comparing to our model, we are considering the entire set of hidden states for the
pedestrian of interest as well as the neighbouring pedestrians when predicting the tth
output element (see Eq. 5-11).
185
As humans we tend to vary our intentions time to time. For an example consider the
problem of navigating in a train station. A person may start walking towards the desired
platform and then realise that he hasn’t got a ticket and then make a sudden change
and move towards the ticket counter. When applying the LSTM model proposed by
Alahi et al. (2016) to such real world scenarios, by observing the immediate preceding
190
hidden state one can generate reactive behaviour to avoid collisions but when doing
long term path planning, even though the LSTM is capable of handling long term
relationships, the prediction process may go almost “blindly” towards the end of the
sequence (Jia et al. (2015)) as we are neglecting vital information about pedestrian’s
behaviour under varying contexts. In contrast, the proposed combined attention model
195
considers the entire sequence of hidden states for both the pedestrian of interest and his
or her neighbours and then we utilise time dependent weights which enables us to vary
their influence in a timely manner.
Additionally, we observed that even in unstructured scenes such as train stations,
11
(a) First 2 clusters
(b) Next 5 clusters
(c) First 5 clusters
(d) Next 5 clusters
Figure 3: Clustering results for Grand Central (a, b) and Edinburgh Informatics Forum (c, d) Datasets
airport terminals and shopping malls where multiple source and sink positions are
200
present, still there exists dominant motion patterns describing the navigation preference of the pedestrians. For instance taking the same train station example, although
the main problem that we are trying to solve here is to navigating while avoiding collisions, humans demonstrate different preferences in doing so. One pedestrian may be
there to meet passengers and hence is wandering in a free area, while another pedestrian
205
may aim to get in or out of the train station as quickly as possible. Therefore one single
LSTM model is not sufficient to capture such ambiguities in navigational patterns. We
observed that such distinct preferences in navigation generate unique trajectory patterns which can be easily segmented via the proposed clustering process. Therefore in
contrast to Alahi et al. (2016), we are learning a different trajectory prediction model
210
for each trajectory cluster.
4. Experiments
We present the experimental results on two publicly available human trajectory
datasets: New York Grand Central (GC) (Yi et al. (2015b)) and Edinburgh Informat-
12
ics Forum (EIF) database (Majecka (2009)). The Grand Central dataset consist of
215
around 12,600 trajectories where as the Edinburgh Informatics Forum database contains around 90,000 trajectories. We have conducted 2 experiments. For the first experiment on the Grand Central dataset, after filtering out short and fragmented trajectories
1
, we are left with 8,000 trajectories, and train our model on 5,000 trajectories and
evaluate the prediction accuracy on 3,000 trajectories. In the next experiment we con220
sidered 3 days worth trajectories from Edinburgh Informatics Forum database, trained
our model on 10,000 trajectories and tested on 5,000 trajectories.
Prior to learning trajectory models, we employ clustering to separate the different
modes of human motion. This allows us to learn separate models for different behaviours, such as one model for a pedestrian who is buying tickets and another for
225
those who are directly entering or leaving the train station. We believe that these different motion patterns generate unique pedestrian behavioural styles and that are well
captured through separate models. This can be achieved via clustering trajectories
based on entire trajectory, but this will produce very large number of clusters or large
number of outliers due to the wide variation in the different modes of human motion.
230
As a result, in each cluster, we would have very few examples to train our prediction
models on. Therefore as a solution to the above stated problem we cluster the trajectories based only on the enter/exit zones. As illustrated in Fig. 3 this approach works
reasonably well at separating different modes of human motion.
Even with clustering based on entry and exit points, the way that a person moves
235
through the environment and how they are influenced by neighbours will vary considerably. For instance consider the clusters represented in green and blue in Fig. 3 (b).
The way that an intersecting trajectory travelling straight up in the scene, from bottom
left towards up left, will affect green and blue clusters differently because of their different exit zones. It’s general human nature to try to avoid collisions while keeping the
240
expected heading direction. Therefore entry/exit zones based clustering is sufficient to
1 We
consider short trajectories to be those with length less than the time period that we are considering
(40 frames) where as fragmented trajectories are trajectories which have discontinuities between 2 consecutive frames due to noise in the tracking process.
13
capture this.
4.1. Quantitative results
Similar to Alahi et al. (2016) we report prediction accuracy with the following
3 error metrics. Let n be the number of trajectories in the testing set, xpred
be the
i,t
245
predicted position for the trajectory i at tth time instance, and xobs
i,t be the respective
observed positions then,
1. Average displacement error (ADE):
TP
pred
n
P
ADE =
2
(xpred
− xobs
i,t )
i,t
i=1 t=Tobs +1
n(Tpred − (Tobs + 1))
.
(14)
.
(15)
2. Final displacement error (FDE) :
n q
P
F DE =
i=1
obs
2
(xpred
i,Tpred − xi,Tpred )
n
3. Average non-linear displacement error (n-ADE): The average displacement error for the non-linear regions of the trajectory,
n
P
n − ADE =
TP
pred
i=1 t=Tobs +1
n
P
pred
2
I(xpred
− xobs
i,t )
i,t )(xi,t
TP
pred
i=1 t=Tobs +1
,
(16)
I(xpred
i,t )
where,
I(xpred
i,t ) =
1
if
0
o.w
d2 yi,t
dx2i,t
6= 0.
(17)
In all experiments we have observed the trajectory (and it’s neighbours) for 20
frames and predicted the trajectory for the next 20 frames. Compared to Alahi et al.
(2016), which has considered sequences of 20 frames total length, we are considering
250
more lengthy sequences (with a total of 40 frames) as in Baccouche et al. (2011) the
authors have shown that LSTM models tend to generate more accurate results with
lengthy sequences.
14
In the experimental results, tabulated in Tab 1, we compare our prediction model
with the state-of-the-art. As the baseline models we implemented Social Force (SF)
255
model from Yamaguchi et al. (2011) and Social LSTM (S-LSTM) model given in Alahi
et al. (2016). For S-LSTM model a local neighbourhood of size 32px was considered
and the hyper-parameters were set according to Alahi et al. (2016). In order to make
direct comparisons with Alahi et al. (2016), the hidden state dimensions of encoders
and decoders of all OUR models were set to be 300 hidden units.
260
For the SF model, preferred speed, destination, and social grouping factors are used
to model the agent behaviour. When predicting the destination, a linear support vector
machine was trained with the ground truth destination areas detected in the Sec. 3.2.
In order to evaluate the strengths of the proposed model, we compare this combined
attention model (OURcmb ) and two variations on our proposed approach: 1) OURsft ,
265
which ignore the neighbouring trajectories and considers only the soft attention component derived from the trajectory of the person of interest when making predictions;
and 2) OURsc which omits the clustering stage such that only a single model (using
combined attention weights) is learnt.
Metirc
Dataset
SF
S-LSTM
OURsc
OURsft
OURcmb
GC
3.364
1.990
1.878
2.041
1.096
EIF
3.124
1.524
1.392
1.685
0.986
GC
5.808
4.519
4.317
5.277
3.011
EIF
3.909
2.510
2.345
3.089
1.311
GC
3.983
1.781
1.701
2.304
0.985
EIF
3.394
2.398
2.098
2.415
0.901
ADE
FDE
n-ADE
Table 1: Quantitative results. In all the methods forecast trajectories are of length 20 frames. The first 2 rows
represents the Average displacement error, rows 3 to 4 are for Final displacement error and the final 2 rows
are for Average non-linear displacement error.
The proposed model outperforms the SF model and S-LSTM model in both datasets.
270
The error reduction is more evident in the GC dataset where there are multiple source
and sink positions, different crowd motion patterns are present and motion paths are
heavily crowded. Comparing the results of OURsc (proposed approach without clus15
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
(m)
(n)
(o)
Figure 4: Qualitative results: Given (in green), Ground Truth (in Blue), Neighbouring (in purple) and Predicted trajectories from OURcmb model (in red), from S-LSTM model (in yellow), from SF model (in
orange). (a) to (l) accurate predictions and (m) to (o) some erroneous predictions
tering) against the S-LSTM model we can see that regardless of the clustering process
the proposed combined attention architecture is capable of improving the trajectory
275
prediction. For all the measured error metrics OURsc has outperformed S-LSTM and
(OURsft ) verifying that it is important to preserve historical data for both the pedestrian of interest as well as the neighbours. Secondly those results show that hard wired
16
weights act as a good approximation of neighbours influence.
When comparing results of OURcmb against OURsc it is evident that the cluster280
ing process has partitioned the trajectories based on these different semantics and via
utilising separate models for each cluster, we were able to generate more accurate predictions. The combined attention model was capable of learning how the neighbours
influence the current trajectory and how this impact varies under different neighbourhood locations.
285
Furthermore, we would like to point out that, because of the separate model learning process we were able to predict the final destination positions with more precision
compared to baseline models where they do not consider the environmental configurations of the unstructured scene. While the proposed approach does not explicitly model
the environment, a certain amount of environmental information is inherently encoded
290
in the entry and exit locations, which the proposed approach is able to leverage.
4.2. Qualitative results
In Fig. 4 we show prediction results of the S-LSTM model, SF model and our
combined attention model (OURcmb ) on the GC dataset. It should be noted that our
model generates better predictions in heavily crowded areas. As we are learning a sep-
295
arate model for each cluster, the prediction models are able to learn different patterns
of influences from neighbouring pedestrians. For instance in the 1st and 3rd column we
demonstrate how the model adapts in order to avoid collisions. In the last row of Fig.
4 we show some failure cases. The reason for such deviations from the ground truth
were mostly due to sudden changes in destination. Even though these trajectories do
300
not match the ground truth, the proposed method still generates plausible trajectories.
For instance, in Fig. 4 (m) and Fig. 4 (o) the model moves side ways to avoid collusion
with the neighbours in the left and right directions.
Three example scenarios that illustrates the advantage of attending to all the hidden
states within that particular context are shown in Fig. 5. The first row shows an exam-
305
ple where the pedestrian of interest exhibits 2 modes of motion (walking and running)
within the same trajectory. In the second row we have an example where the previous
context of the pedestrian of interest is useful in tthe final prediction. Third row shows
17
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
Figure 5: Example scenarios: Columns (left to right): first observation of the trajectory; half way through;
last observation prior to prediction; prediction from the respective models. 1st row shows an example where
the pedestrian exhibits 2 modes of motion (walking and running) within the same trajectory. 2nd row shows
an example where the previous context of the pedestrian is useful in prediction. 3rd row shows an example
where the pedestrian is moving as part of a group. Colours: Given trajectory (in green), Ground Truth (in
Blue), Neighbouring (in purple) and Predicted trajectories from OURcmb model (in red), from S-LSTM
model (in yellow), from OURsc model (in cyan). In order to preserve visibility without occlusions we have
plotted only the closest 2 neighbours in each direction.
an example where pedestrian exhibits a group motion. The first three columns show
the progression of the motion from the start of the trajectory (first column) to the point
310
directly before the prediction is made (third column). The given trajectory of the person of interest is shown in green and the neighbouring trajectories are shown in purple.
In order to preserve visibility without occlusions we have plotted only the closest 2
neighbours in each direction. Finally in the fourth column we have presented the respective predictions from OURcmb model (in red), from S-LSTM model (in yellow),
315
from OURsc model (in cyan). The ground truth observations are shown in blue.
When considering the example shown in Fig. 5 (a)-(d) the pedestrian of interest
exhibits a running behaviour when entering the scene (Fig. 5 (a)). Then at half way
through her trajectory she shifts her behaviour to walking (Fig. 5 (b)). Therefore at
18
the time of the prediction (Fig. 5 (c)), the hidden states of the baseline model will be
320
dominated by the walking behaviour as it is the most recent behaviour of this particular
pedestrian. Therefore the predictions generated by the S-LSTM model are erroneous.
But as we are attending to all the previous hidden states before predicting the future
sequence, the multi model nature of that pedestrian’s motion has been captured by the
OURsc and OURcmb models.
325
Another example scenario where the proposed model out performs it’s baseline is
shown in Fig. 5 (e)-(h). When deciding upon whether to give way or to cut through
the pedestrian group, models OURsc and OURcmb outperforms the S-LSTM model.
While attending to the historical data in 5 (f) we can see the behaviour of the pedestrian
of interest under a similar context. Therefore the proposed models can anticipate that
330
the preferred behaviour of the pedestrian of interest under such context is giving way to
the others. But in the S-LSTM model as it’s attending only to the immediate preceding
hidden states and those long range dependencies are not captured.
In the example shown in Fig. 5 (i)-(l) we illustrate the importance of considering the
entire history of the neighbours. The way that the neighbours affect to a pedestrian dur-
335
ing group motion vastly differs to the impact group motion has on a pedestrian walking
alone. For example pedestrians moving as part of a group tend to walk at a similar velocity, keeping small distances between themselves, stopping or turing together; where
as pedestrians walking alone try to keep a safe distance between themselves and their
neighbours to avoid collisions. These notions can be quickly captured while observing
340
the neighbourhood history. Therefore the predictions generated by both OURsc and
OURcmb models outperforms the baseline S-LSTM model which only considered the
immediate preceding hidden state of the neighbours when generating the predictions.
When comparing the predictions from OURsc model against OURcmb model it
is evident that the more spatial context specific predictions are generated by OURcmb
345
as it has been specifically trained on the examples from that particular spatial region.
Therefore it anticipates the motion of a particular pedestrian more accurately. Still in
all the example scenarios OURsc is shown to be capable of generating acceptable
predictions compared to the baseline model, showing that the proposed combined attention mechanism is capable of generating more accurate and realistic trajectories than
19
350
the current state-of-the-art.
5. Abnormal behaviour detection
The proposed framework can be directly applied for detecting abnormal pedestrian
behaviour. A naive approach would be to predict the trajectory for the period of Tobs+1
to Tpred while observing the same trajectory over this time period and measuring the
355
deviation between the observed and the predicted trajectories. If the deviation is greater
than a threshold, then an abnormality can be said to have occurred. However due to the
adaptive nature of deep neural networks, abnormal behaviours such as: i) sudden turns
and changes in walking directions; and ii) trajectories with abnormal velocities; may
not be classified as abnormal events.
360
We observe that the hidden states of the LSTM encoder decoder framework hold
vital information which is used to model the walking behaviour of the pedestrian of
interest. Hence, if his or her behaviour is abnormal then the hidden state values for that
pedestrian should be distinct from those of a normal pedestrian.
With that intuition we randomly selected 500 trajectories from the Grand Central
365
dataset and predicted the trajectories for those pedestrians. The trajectories were hand
labeled for abnormal behaviour, considering sudden turns and changes in walking direction and abnormal velocities as the set of abnormal behaviours. The dataset consists
of 445 normal trajectories and 55 abnormal trajectories. Then we extracted the encoded
hidden states (h(t) = [h(1) , . . . , h(Tobs ) ]) for the given trajectory for that pedestrian and
370
the hidden states used for decoding (s(t) = [s(Tobs+1 ) , . . . , s(Tpred ) ]). The resultant hidden states are passed through DBSCAN to detect outliers. With the proposed approach
we detected 441 trajectories as being normal and 59 trajectories as abnormal. The
resultant detections are given in Table 2.
Analysing the classification results, we see that false alarms are mainly due to be-
375
haviours that are erroneously detected as abnormal being uncommon in the database.
Cases such as people changing direction to buy tickets, and passengers wandering in
the free area are detected as abnormal due to the fact that they are not significantly
present in the subset of trajectories selected for this task.
20
Ground Truth
Abnormal
Normal
Abnormal
47
12
Normal
8
433
Total
55
445
Predicted
Table 2: Abnormal Event detection with the proposed algorithm: This approach has detected 47 out of 55
ground truth abnormal events
We compare this approach to the naive approach given above. It is evident that
380
some abnormal trajectories are misclassified as normal behaviour due to its lack of
deviation from the observed trajectory. See Tab. 3
Ground Truth
Abnormal
Normal
Abnormal
29
24
Normal
26
421
Total
55
445
Predicted
Table 3: Abnormal event detection with naive approach: This approach has detected only 29 out of 55 ground
truth abnormal events
Some examples of detected abnormal events are shown in Fig. 6. The first row
shows the abnormal behaviour detected due to sudden change of moving direction.
Even though, in the examples shown (d) and (e), there isn’t a significant deviation be385
tween the predicted path and the observed path, our abnormal event detection approach
has accurately classified the event due to the sudden circular turn in the trajectory in
(d) and abnormal velocity in (e).
6. Conclusion
In this paper we have proposed a novel neural attention based framework to model
390
pedestrian flow in a surveillance setting. We extend the classical encoder-decoder
21
(b)
(a)
(c)
(e)
(d)
Figure 6: Abnormal event detections: (a)-(c) abnormal behaviour detected due to sudden change of moving
direction. Abnormal behaviour due to sudden circular turn (d) and abnormal velocity in (e)
framework in sequence to sequence modelling to incorporate both soft attention as
well as hard-wired attention. This has a major positive impact when handling longer
trajectories in heavily cluttered neighbourhoods. The hand-crafted hard-wired attention weights approximate the neighbour’s influence and make the application of atten395
tion models pursuable for real world scenarios with large number of neighbours. We
tested our proposed model in two challenging publicly available surveillance datasets
and demonstrated state-of-the-art performance. Our new neural attention framework
exhibited a stronger ability to accurately predict pedestrian motion, even in the presence of multiple source and sink positions and with high crowd densities observed.
400
Furthermore, we have shown how the proposed approach can support abnormal event
detection through hidden state clustering. This approach is able to accurately detect
events in challenging situations, without handcrafting the features. Apart from direct
applications such as abnormal behaviour detection, improving passenger flow in transport environments, this framework can be extended to any application domain where
405
modelling multiple co-occurring trajectories is necessary. Some potential areas include
modelling aircraft movements, ship trajectories and vehicle traffic.
22
References
References
Alahi, A., Goel, K., Ramanathan, V., Robicquet, A., Fei-Fei, L., Savarese, S., 2016.
410
Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces, in: CVPR.
Alahi, A., Ramanathan, V., Li, F.F., 2014. Socially-aware large-scale crowd forecasting., in: CVPR, pp. 2211–2218.
Baccouche, M., Mamalet, F., Wolf, C., Garcia, C., Baskurt, A., 2011. Sequential
deep learning for human action recognition, in: HBU, pp. 29–39. doi:10.1007/
415
978-3-642-25446-8_4.
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., Bengio, Y., 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 .
Emonet, R., Varadarajan, J., Odobez, J.M., 2011. Extracting and locating temporal motifs in video scenes using a hierarchical non parametric bayesian model., in: CVPR,
420
pp. 3233–3240.
Ester, M., peter Kriegel, H., Sander, J., Xu, X., 1996. A density-based algorithm for
discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise, pp. 226–231.
Giannotti, F., Nanni, M., Pinelli, F., Pedreschi, D., 2007. Trajectory pattern mining, in:
ACM SIGKDD, pp. 330–339. doi:10.1145/1281192.1281230.
425
Goroshin, R., Bruna, J., Tompson, J., Eigen, D., LeCun, Y., 2015. Unsupervised feature
learning from temporal data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.02518 .
Helbing, D., Molnár, P., 1995. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Phys. Rev.
E 51, 4282–4286. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282.
Hospedales, T.M., Gong, S., Xiang, T., 2009. A markov clustering topic model for
430
mining behaviour in video., in: ICCV, pp. 1165–1172.
23
Jia, X., Gavves, E., Fernando, B., Tuytelaars, T., 2015. Guiding the long-short term
memory model for image caption generation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2407–2415.
Koppula, H.S., Saxena, A., 2013. Anticipating human activities using object affor435
dances for reactive robotic response., in: IROS, p. 2071.
Lai, K., Bo, L., Fox, D., 2014. Unsupervised feature learning for 3d scene labeling, in:
ICRA, pp. 3050–3057. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2014.6907298.
Lee, J.G., Han, J., Whang, K.Y., 2007.
Trajectory clustering: A partition-and-
group framework, in: ACM SIGMOD, pp. 593–604. doi:10.1145/1247480.
440
1247546.
Madry, M., Bo, L., Kragic, D., Fox, D., 2014. ST-HMP: unsupervised spatio-temporal
feature learning for tactile data, in: ICRA, pp. 2262–2269. doi:10.1109/ICRA.
2014.6907172.
Majecka, B., 2009. Statistical models of pedestrian behaviour in the forum. MSc
445
Dissertation, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh .
Mnih, V., Heess, N., Graves, A., et al., 2014. Recurrent models of visual attention, in:
Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 2204–2212.
Morris, B., Trivedi, M.M., 2009. Learning trajectory patterns by clustering: Experimental studies and comparative evaluation., in: CVPR, pp. 312–319.
450
Pellegrini, S., Ess, A., Gool, L.J.V., 2010. Improving data association by joint modeling
of pedestrian trajectories and groupings., in: ECCV, pp. 452–465.
Sharma, S., Kiros, R., Salakhutdinov, R., 2015. Action recognition using visual attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.04119 .
Wang, X., Ma, K.T., Ng, G.W., Grimson, W.E.L., 2008. Trajectory analysis and se-
455
mantic region modeling using a nonparametric bayesian model., in: CVPR, pp. 1–8.
24
Williams, R.J., 1992. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist
reinforcement learning. Machine Learning 8, 229–256.
Xu, J., Denman, S., Fookes, C.B., Sridharan, S., 2012. Unusual scene detection using
distributed behaviour model and sparse representation. AVSS , 48 – 53.
460
Xu, K., Ba, J., Kiros, R., Cho, K., Courville, A.C., Salakhutdinov, R., Zemel, R.S.,
Bengio, Y., 2015. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with
visual attention., in: ICML, pp. 77–81.
Yamaguchi, K., Berg, A.C., Ortiz, L.E., Berg, T.L., 2011. Who are you with and where
are you going?, in: CVPR, pp. 1345–1352.
465
Yao, L., Torabi, A., Cho, K., Ballas, N., Pal, C., Larochelle, H., Courville, A., 2015.
Describing videos by exploiting temporal structure, in: ICCV, pp. 4507 – 4515.
Yi, S., Li, H., Wang, X., 2015a. Understanding pedestrian behaviors from stationary
crowd groups., in: CVPR, pp. 3488 – 3496.
Yi, S., Li, H., Wang, X., 2015b. Understanding pedestrian behaviors from stationary
470
crowd groups, in: CVPR, pp. 3488 – 3496.
Yoo, D., Park, S., Lee, J.Y., Paek, A.S., Kweon, I.S., 2015. Attentionnet: Aggregating
weak directions for accurate object detection., in: ICCV, pp. 2659–2667.
Zhou, B., Tang, X., Wang, X., 2015. Learning collective crowd behaviors with dynamic
pedestrian-agents. Journal of Computer Vision 111, 50–68.
25
| 9cs.NE
|
DeepConf: Automating Data Center Network
Topologies Management with Machine Learning
arXiv:1712.03890v1 [cs.NI] 11 Dec 2017
Christopher Streiffer∗ , Huan Chen∗† , Theophilus Benson+ , Asim Kadav‡
Duke University∗ UESTC, China† Brown University+ NEC Labs‡
ABSTRACT
In recent years, many techniques have been developed
to improve the performance and efficiency of data center networks. While these techniques provide high accuracy, they are often designed using heuristics that leverage domain-specific properties of the workload or hardware.
In this vision paper, we argue that many data center
networking techniques, e.g., routing, topology augmentation, energy savings, with diverse goals actually share
design and architectural similarity. We present a design
for developing general intermediate representations of
network topologies using deep learning that is amenable
to solving classes of data center problems. We develop
a framework, DeepConf, that simplifies the processing
of configuring and training deep learning agents that
use the intermediate representation to learns different
tasks. To illustrate the strength of our approach, we configured, implemented, and evaluated a DeepConf-agent
that tackles the data center topology augmentation problem. Our initial results are promising — DeepConf performs comparably to the optimal.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Data center networks (DCN) are a crucial and important part of the Internet’s ecosystem. The performance
of these DCNs impact a wide variety of services from
web browsing and videos to Internet of Things. The
poor performance of these DCNs can result in as much
as $4 million in lost revenue [1].
Motivated by the importance of these networks, the
networking community has explored techniques for improving and managing the performance of the data center network topology by: (1) designing better routing or
traffic engineering algorithms [6, 8, 13, 10], (2) improving performance of a fixed topology by adding a limited
number of flexible links [33, 11, 17, 16], and (3) removing corrupted and underutilized links from the topology
to save energy and improve performance [18, 14, 35].
Regardless of the approach, these topology-oriented
techniques have three things in common: (1) Each is
formalized as an optimization problem. (2) Due to the
impracticality of scalably solving these optimizations,
greedy heuristics are employed to create approximate
solutions. (3) Each heuristic is intricately tied to the application patterns and does not generalize across novel
patterns. Existing domain-specific heuristics provide suboptimal performance and are often limited to specific
scenarios. Thus as a community, we are forced to revisit
and redesign these heuristics when the application pattern or network details changes – even a minor change.
For example, while c-through [33] and FireFly [17] solve
broadly identical problems, they leverage different heuristics to account for low-level differences.
In this paper, we articulate our vision for replacing
domain-specific rule-based heuristics for topology management with a more general machine learning-based
(ML) model that quickly learns optimal solutions to a
class of problems while adapting to changes in the application patterns, network dynamics, and low-level network details. Unlike recent attempts that employ ML
to learn point solutions, e.g., cluster scheduling [23] or
routing [9], in this paper, we present a general framework, called DeepConf, that simplifies the process of
designing ML models for a broad range of DCN topology problems and eliminates the challenges associated
with efficiently training new models.
The key challenges in designing DeepConf are: (1)
tackling the dichotomy that exists between deep learning’s requirements for large amounts of supervised data
and the unavailability of these required datasets, and (2)
designing a general, but highly accurate, deep learning
model that efficiently generalizes to learning a broad array of data center problems ranging from topology management and routing to energy savings.
The key insight underlying DeepConf is that intermediate features generated from the parallel convolutional
layers using network data, e.g., traffic matrix, allows us
to generate an intermediate representation of the network’s state that enables learning a broad range of data
center problems. Moreover, while labeled production
data crucial for machine learning is unavailable, empir-
ical studies [21] show that modern data center traffic is
higly predictable and thus amenable to offline learning
with network simulators and historical traces.
DeepConf builds on this insight by using reinforcement learning (RL), an unsupervised technique, that learns
through experience and makes no assumptions on how
the network works. Rather, they are trained through the
use of a reward signal which “guides” them towards an
optimal solution and thus do not require real world data,
and, instead, they can be trained using simulators.
The DeepConf framework provides a predefined RL
model with the intermediate representation, a specific
design for configuring this model to address different
problems, an optimized simulator to enable efficient learning, and an SDN-based platform for capturing network
data and reconfiguring the network.
In this paper, we make the following contributions:
• We present a novel RL-based SDN architecture for
developing and training deep ML models for a broad
range of DCN tasks.
• We design a novel input feature extraction for DCNs
for developing different ML models over this intermediate representation of network state.
• We implemented a DeepConf-agent tackling the topology augmentation problem and evaluated it on representative topologies [15, 4] and traces [3], showing
that our approach performs comparable to optimal.
2.
RELATED WORK
Our work is motivated by the recent success of applying machine learning and RL algorithms to computer
games and robotic planning [25, 31, 32]. The most
closely related work [9] applies RL to packet routing.
Unlike [9], DeepConf tackles the topology augmentation problem and explores the use of deep networks as
function approximators for RL. Existing applications of
machine learning to data centers focus on improving
cluster scheduling [23] and more recently by Google to
optimize Power Usage Effectiveness(PUE) [2]. In this
vision paper, we take a different stance and focus on
identifying a class of equivalent data center management
operations, namely topology management and configuration, that are amenable to a common machine learning
approach and design a modular system that enables different agents to interoperate over a network.
3.
BACKGROUND
This section provides an overview of data center networking challenges and solutions and provides background on our reinforcement learning methods.
Ethernet
Fabric
Optical Circuit
Optical Switch
Figure 1: One optical switch with k=4 Fat Tree Topology.
3.1
Data Center Networks
Data center networks introduce a range of challenges
from topology design and routing algorithms to VM placement and energy saving techniques.
Data centers support a large variety of workloads and
applications with time-varying bandwidth requirements.
This variance in bandwidth requirements leads to hotspots
at varying locations and at different points in time. To
support these arbitrary bandwidth requirements, data center operators can employ non-blocking topologies; however, non-blocking topologies are prohibitively costly.
Instead, these operators employ a range of techniques
ranging from hybrid architectures [33, 11, 17, 16], traffic engineering algorithms [6, 8, 13, 10], and energy
saving techniques [18, 28]. Below, we describe these
techniques and illustrate common designs.
Augmented Architectures: This class of approaches
build on the intuition that at any given point in time,
there are only a small number of hotspots (or congested
links). Thus, there is no need to build an expensive
topology that supports full bisection (eliminating all potential points of congestion). Instead, the existing topology can be augmented with a small number of links
which can be added ondemand and moved to the location of the hotspot or congested links. These approaches
augment the data center’s ethernet network with a small
number of optical [33, 11], wireless [16], or free optics [17]. 1 For example, Figure 1 shows a traditional
Fat-Tree topology augmented with an optical switch –
as was proposed by Helios [11].
These proposals argue for monitoring the traffic, using
an Integer Linear Program (ILP) or heuristic to detect
the hotspots and place the flexible links at the location
with these hotspots. Unfortunately, moving these flexible links incurs a large switching time during which the
links are not operational. These intelligent and efficient
algorithms are developed to effectively detect hotspots
and efficiently place links.
Traffic Engineering: Orthogonal approaches [6, 8, 13,
10] focus on routing. Instead of changing the topologies,
these approaches change the mapping of flows to paths
within a fixed topology. These proposals, also, argue
for monitoring traffic and detecting hotspots. Instead of
changing topologies, these techniques move a subset of
1
The number of augmented links is significantly smaller than
the number of data center’s permanent links.
flows from congested links to un-congested links.
Energy Savings Data centers are notorious for their energy usage [14]. To address this, researchers have proposed techniques to improve energy efficiency by detecting periods of low utilization and selectively turning
off links [18, 28]. These proposals argue for monitoring traffic, detecting low utilization, and powering-down
links in portions of the data center with low utilizations.
A key challenge with these techniques is to turn on the
powered-down links before demands rise.
Taking a step back, these techniques roughly follow
the same design and operate in three steps (1) gather
network traffic matrix, (2) run an ILP to predict heavy
(or low) usage, and (3) perform a specific action on a
subset of the network. The actions range from augmenting flexible links, turning off links, or moving traffic. In
all situations, the ILP does not scale to a large network
and a domain-specific heuristic is often used in its place.
3.2
Reinforcement Learning
Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms learn through
experience with a goal towards maximizing rewards. Unlike supervised learning where algorithms train over labels, RL algorithms learn by interacting with an environment such as a game or a network simulator.
In traditional RL, an agent interacts with an environment over a number of discrete time steps. Hence, at
each time step t, the agent in a world observes a state st
in order to select an action at from a possible action set
A. The agent is guided by a policy, π, which is a function that maps state st to actions at . The agent receives
a reward rt for each action and transitions to the next
state st+1 . The goal of the agent is maximizing the total
reward. This process continues until the agent reaches a
final state or time limit, after which the environment is
reset and a new training episode is played. After a number of training episodes, the agent learns to pick actions
that maximize the rewards and can learn to handle unexpected states. RL is effective and has been successfully
used to model robotics, game bots, etc.
The goal of commonly used policy-based RL is to
find a policy, π, that maximizes the cumulative reward
and converges to a theoretical optimal policy. In deep
policy-based methods, a neural network computes a policy distribution π(at |st ; θ), where θ represents the set of
parameters of the function. Deep networks as function
approximators is a recent development and other learning methods can be used. We now describe the REINFORCE and actor-critic policy methods which represent different methods to score the policy J(θ). REINFORCE methods
use gradient ascent on E[Rt ],
P∞ [34]
i
where Rt =
i=0 γ rt+i is the accumulated reward
starting from time step t and discounted at each step
by γ ∈ (0, 1], the discount factor. The REINFORCE
method, which is the Monte-Carlo method, updates θ
using the gradient ∇θ log π(at |st ; θ)Rt , which is an unbiased estimator of ∇θ E[Rt ]. The value function is
computed as V π (st ) = E[Rt |st ] which is the expected
return for following the policy π in state st . This method
provides actions with high returns but suffers from highvariance of gradient estimates.
Asynchronous Advantage Actor Critic (A3C): A3C [24]
improves REINFORCE performance by operating asynchronously and by using a deep network to approximate
the policy and value faction. A3C uses the actor-critic
method which additionally computes a critic function
that approximates the value function. A3C, as used by
us, uses a network with two convolutional layers followed by a fully connected layer. Each hidden layer
is followed by a nonlinearity function (ReLU). A softmax layer which approximates the policy function and
a linear layer to output an estimate of the value function
V (st ; θ) together constitute the output of this network.
Asynchronous gradient descent using multiple agents is
used to train the network and this improves the training
speed. A central server (similar to a parameter server)
coordinates the parallel agents – each agent calculates
the gradients and sends the updates to the server after a
fixed number of steps, or when a final state is reached.
Furthermore, following each update, the central server
propagates new weights to the agents to achieve a consensus on the policy values. There is a cost function with
each deep network (policy and value). Using two loss
functions has found to improve convergence and produce better-regularized models. The policy cost function is given as:
fπ (θ) = log π (at |st ; θ) (Rt − V (st ; θt ))+βH (π (st ; θ))
(3.1)
where θt represents the values of the parameters θ at
Pk−1
time t, Rt = i=0 γ i rt+i + γ k V (st+k ; θt ) is the estimated discounted reward.H (π (st ; θ)) is used to favor
exploration and its strength is controlled by the factor β.
The cost function for the estimated value
function is:
2
fv (θ) = (Rt − V (st ; θ))
(3.2)
Additionally, we augment our A3C model to learn
current states apart from accumulating rewards for good
configurations using GAE [30]. The deep network, that
replaces the transition matrix as the function approximator learns the value of the given state and the policy
of the given state. The model uses GAE to compute the
value of a given state that not only returns the reward
for the model for the given policy decision but also rewards the model for estimating the value of the state.
This helps to guide the model to learn the states instead
of just maximizing rewards.
4.
VISION
Training
Harness
Network
Simulator
DeepConf
Agent
DeepConf
DeepConf
……
Agent
Agent
DeepConf Abstraction Layer
SDN Controller
……
Network Topology
Figure 2: DeepConf Architecture
Our vision is to automate a subset of data center management and operational tasks by leveraging DeepRL.
At a high-level, we anticipate the existence of several
DeepRL agents, each trained for a specific set of tasks
e.g. traffic-engineering, energy-savings, or topologyaugmentations. Each agent will run as an application
atop an SDN controller. The use of SDN provides the
agents with an interface for gathering their required network state and a mechanism for enforcing their actions.
For example, DeepConf should be able to assemble the
traffic matrix by polling the different devices within the
network, compute a decision for how the optical switch
should be configured to best accommodate the current
network load, and reconfigure the network.
At a high-level, DeepConf’s architecture consists of
three components (Figure 2): the network simulator to
enable offline training of the DeepRL agents, the DeepConf abstraction layer to facilitate communication between the DeepRL agents and the network, and the DeepRL
agents, called DeepConf-agents, which encapsulate data
center functionality.
Applying learning: The primary challenges in applying
machine learning to network problems are (1) the deficiency of training data pertaining to operator and network behavior and (2) the lack of models and loss functions that can accurately model the problem and generalize to unexpected situations. This shortage presents
a roadblock for using supervised-based approaches for
training ML models. To address this issue, DeepConf
uses RL where the model is trained by exploring different network states and environments generated by the
surplus of simulators available in the network community. Coupled with the wide availability of network job
traces, this allows for DeepConf to learn a highly generalizable policy.
DeepConf Abstraction Layer: Today’s SDN controllers
expose a primitive interface with low-level information.
The DeepConf applications will instead require highlevel models and interfaces. For example, our agents
will require interfaces that provide control over paths
rather than over flow table entries. While emerging approaches [19] argue for similar interfaces, these approaches
do not provide a sufficiently rich set of interfaces for
the broad range of agents we expect to support and do
not provide composition primitives for safely combining the output from the different agents. Moreover, existing composition operators [27, 20, 12] assume that
the different SDN applications (or DeepConf-agent in
our case) are generating non-conflicting actions – hence
these operators can not tackling conflict actions. SDN
Composition approaches [29, 7, 26] that do tackle conflicting actions, require significant rewrite of the SDNApp which we are unable to do because DeepConfagent are rewritten within the DeepRL paradigm.
More concretely, we require high-layer SDN abstractions that enable to RLAgents to more easily learn and
act of the network. Additionally, we require novel composition operators that can reason about and tackle conflicting actions generated by RLAgents.
Domain-specific Simulators: (Low hanging fruit) Existing SDN research leverages a popular emulation platform, Mininet, which fails to scale to large experiments.
A key requirement for employing DeepRL is to have efficient and scalable simulators that replays traces and
enables learning from these traces. We extend flowbased simulators to model the various dimensions that
are required to train our models. To improve efficiency,
we explore techniques that partition the simulation and
enables reuse of results — in essence, to enable incremental simulations.
In addressing our high-level vision and developing solutions to the above challenges, there are several highlevel goals that a production-scale system must address:
(1) our techniques must generalize across topologies,
traffic matrixes, and a range of operational settings, e.g.,
link failures; (2) our techniques must be as accurate and
efficient as existing state-of-the-art techniques; and (3)
our solutions must incur low operational overheads, e.g.,
minimizing optical switching time or TCAM utilization.
5.
DESIGN
In this section, we provide a broad description of how
to define and structure existing data center network management techniques as RL tasks, then describe the methods for training the resulting DeepConf-agents.
5.1
DeepConf Agents
In defining each new DeepConf-agent, there are four
main functions that a developer must specify: state space,
action space, learning model, and reward function. The
action space and reward are both specific to the management task being performed and are, in turn, unique
to the agent. Respectively, they express the set of actions
an agent can take during each step and the reward for the
actions taken. The state space and learning models are
more general and can be shared and reused across different DeepConf-agents. This is because of the fundamental similarities shared between the data center management problems, and because the agents are specifically
designed for data centers.
In defining a DeepConf agent for the topology augmentation problem, we (1) define state-spaces specific
to the topology, (2) design a reward function based on
application level metrics, and (3) define actions that correlate to activating/de-activating links.
State Space: In general, the state space consists of two
types of data – each reflecting the state of the network
at a given point in time. First, the general network state
that all DeepConf-agents require: the network’s traffic
matrix (TM) which contains information on the flows
which will executed during the last t seconds of the simulation.
Second, a DeepConf-agent specific state-space that
captures the impact of the actions on the network. For
example, for the topology augmentation problem, this
would be the network topology – note, the actions change
the topology. Whereas for the traffic engineering problem, this would be a mapping of flows to paths – note,
the actions change a flow’s routes.
Learning Model: Our learning model utilizes a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to compute policy decisions.
The exact model for a DeepConf-agent depends on
the number of state-spaces used as input. In general, the
model will have as many CNN-blocks as there are state
spaces – one CNN-block for each state space. The output of these blocks are concatenated together and input
into two fully connected layers, followed by a softmax
output layer. For example, for the topology-augmentation
problem, as observed in Figure 4, our DeepConf-agent
has two CNN blocks to operate on both the topology
and the TM states spaces in parallel. This allows for the
lower CNN layers to perform feature extraction on the
input spatial data, and for the fully connected layers to
assemble these features in a meaningful way.
5.2
Network Training
To train a DeepConf-agent, we run the agent against
a network simulator. The interaction between the simulator (described in Section 7) and RL agent can be described as follows (Figure 3): (1) The DeepConf agent
receives state si from the simulator at training step i.
(2) The DeepConf-agent uses the state information to
make a policy decision about the network, and returns
the selected actions to the simulator. For the DeepConfagent for the topology augmentation problem, called the
Augmentation-Agent, the actions are the links to activate and hence a new topology. (3) If the topology
(5) Get reward
Simulator
Flows
Network
Topology
(4) Update
route
(3)
Add links
Control
Interface
(1)
Read state
DeepConf
Agent
(2)
Decision
Figure 3: DeepConf-agent model training.
changes, the simulator re-computes the paths for the active flows. (4) The simulator executes the flows for t seconds. (5) The simulator returns the reward ri and state
si+1 to the DeepConf-agent, and the process restarts.
Initialization During the initial training phase, we force
the model to explore the environment by randomizing
the selection process — the probability that an action is
picked corresponds to the value of the index which represents the action. For instance, with the AugmentationAgent, link i has probability wi of being selected. As
the model becomes more familiar with the states and
corresponding values, the model will better formulate
its policy decision. At this point, the model will associate a higher probability with the links it believes to
have a higher reward, which will cause these links to be
selected at a higher frequency. This methodology allows
for the model to reinforce its decisions about links, while
the randomization helps the model avoid local-minima.
Learning Optimization: To improve the efficiency
of learning, the RL agent maintains a log containing the
state, policy decision, and corresponding reward. The
RL agent performs experience replay after n simulation steps. During replay, the log is unrolled to compute the policy loss across the specified number of steps
using Equation 3.1. The agent is trained using Adam
stochastic optimization [22], with an initial learning rate
of 10−4 and a learning rate decay factor of 0.95. We
found that a smaller learning rate and low decay helped
the model better explore the environment and form a
more optimal policy.
6.
USE CASE: AUGMENTATION AGENT
More formally defined, in the topology augmentation
problem the data center consists of a fixed hierarchical
topology and an optical switch, which connects all the
top-of-rack switches. While the optical switch is physically connected to all ToR switches, unfortunately, the
optical switch can only support a limited number of active links. Given this limitation, the rules for the topology problem are defined as:
• The model must select n links to activate at a given
step during the simulation.
• The model receives a reward based on the link utilization and the flow duration.
12
DeepConf
Optimal
Flow Completion Time (s)
10
• All flows are routed using equal-cost multi-path
routing (ECMP).
State Space: The agent specific state space is the network topology, which is represented by a sparse matrix
where entries within the cells correspond to active links
within the network.
Action Space: The RL agent interacts with the environment by adding links between edge switches. The action space for the model, therefore, corresponds to the
different possible link combinations and is represented
as an n dimensional vector. The values within the vector correspond to a probability distribution, where wi is
equal to the probability of link i being the optimal pick
for the given input state s. The model selects the highest
n values from this distribution as the links that should be
added to the network topology.
Reward: The goal of the model can be summarized as:
(1) Maximize link utilization and (ii) Minimize the average flow-completion time.
With this in mind, we formulate our reward function
as:
X X bf
(6.1)
R(Θ, s, i) =
tf
6
4
2
0
Figure 4: The CNN model utilized by the RL agent.
• The model collects the reward on a per-link basis
after t seconds of simulation.
8
FatTree
Topology
VL2
Figure 5: Median Flow Completion Time.
simulator using a large scale map-reduce traces from
Facebook [3].
We evaluate two state-of-the-art clos-style data center
topologies: K=4 Fat-tree [5] and VL2 [15]. In our analysis, we focus on flow completion time (FCT) a metric
which captures the duration between the first and last
packet of a flow. We augment both topologies by adding
an optical switch with four links. Here we compare
DeepConf against the optimal solution derived from a
linear program — Note: this optimal solution can not be
solved with larger topologies [8].
Learning Results: The training results demonstrate
that the RL agent learns to optimize its policy decision to
increase the total reward received across each episode.
We observed that the loss decreases as training increases, with the largest decrease occurs during the initial training episodes, a result consistent with the learning rate decay factor employed during training.
Performance Results: The results, Figure 5, show that
DeepConf performs comparable with optimal [33, 11]
across representative topologies and workloads. Thus,
our system is able to learn a solution that’s close to the
optimal across a range of topologies.
Takeaway We believe these initial results are promising, and that more work is required in order to understand and improve the performance of DeepConf.
f ∈F l∈f
Where F represents all active and completed flows during the previous iteration step, l represents the links used
by flow f , bf represents the number of bytes transferred
during the step time, and tf represents the total duration of the flow. The purpose of this reward function is
to reward for high link utilization but penalize for long
lasting flows. The design of this function has the effect
of guiding the model towards completing large flows
within a smaller period of time.
7.
EVALUATION
In this section, we analyze DeepConf under realistic
workload with representative topologies.
Experiment Setup
We evaluate DeepConf on a trace driven flow-level
8.
DISCUSSION
We now discuss open questions:
Learning to generalize: In order to avoid over-fitting
to a specific topology, we train our agent over a large
number of simulator configurations. DeepRL agents need
to be trained and evaluated on many different platforms
to avoid being overtly specific to few networks and correctly handle unexpected scenarios. Solutions that employ machine learning to address network problems using simulators need to be cognizant of these issues when
deciding the training data.
Learning new reward functions: DeepRL methods
need appropriate reward functions to ensure that they
optimize for the correct goals. For some networks problems like topology configuration this may be straightforward. However, other problems like routing may require a weighted combination of network parameters
that need to be correctly designed for the agent to operate the network correctly.
Learning other data center problems. In this paper, we focused on problems that center around learning
to adjust the topology and routing. Yet, the space of
data center problems is much larger. As part of ongoing
work, we are investigating intermediate representations
and models for capturing high-level tasks.
Micro load balancing in data centers with drill. In Proceedings
of ACM HotNets 2015.
[14] A. Greenberg, J. Hamilton, D. A. Maltz, and P. Patel. The cost
of a cloud: Research problems in data center networks.
SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 39(1):68–73, Dec. 2008.
[15] A. Greenberg, J. R. Hamilton, N. Jain, S. Kandula, C. Kim,
P. Lahiri, D. A. Maltz, P. Patel, and S. Sengupta. Vl2: A
scalable and flexible data center network. In Proceedings of
ACM SIGCOMM 2009.
[16] D. Halperin, S. Kandula, J. Padhye, P. Bahl, and D. Wetherall.
Augmenting data center networks with multi-gigabit wireless
links. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2011.
9. CONCLUSION
[17] N. Hamedazimi, Z. Qazi, H. Gupta, V. Sekar, S. R. Das, J. P.
Longtin, H. Shah, and A. Tanwer. Firefly: A reconfigurable
Our high level goal, is to develop ML-based systems
wireless data center fabric using free-space optics. In
that replace existing heuristic-based approach to tackProceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2014.
[18] B. Heller, S. Seetharaman, P. Mahadevan, Y. Yiakoumis,
ling data center networking challenges. This shift from
P. Sharma, S. Banerjee, and N. McKeown. Elastictree: Saving
heuristics to ML, will enable us to design solutions that
energy in data center networks. In Proceedings of USENIX
can adapt to changes in patterns by consumting data and
NSDI 2010.
relearning – an automated task. In this paper, we take
[19] V. Heorhiadi, M. K. Reiter, and V. Sekar. Simplifying
software-defined network optimization using sol. In
the first steps towards acheving these goals by designProceedings of USENIX NSDI 2016.
ing a reinforcement learning based framework, called
[20] X. Jin, J. Gossels, J. Rexford, and D. Walker. Covisor: A
DeepConf, for automatically learning and implementing
compositional hypervisor for software-defined networks. In
Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on Networked
a range of data center networking techniques.
Systems Design and Implementation, NSDI’15, pages 87–101,
Berkeley, CA, USA, 2015. USENIX Association.
10. REFERENCES
[21] S. A. Jyothi, C. Curino, I. Menache, S. M. Narayanamurthy,
A. Tumanov, J. Yaniv, R. Mavlyutov, I. Goiri, S. Krishnan,
[1] Amazon found every 100ms of latency cost them 1% in sales.
J. Kulkarni, and S. Rao. Morpheus: Towards automated slos for
https://blog.gigaspaces.com/
enterprise clusters. In 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating
amazon-found-every-100ms-of-latency-cost-them-1-in-sales/.
Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), pages
117–134, GA, 2016. USENIX Association.
[2] DeepMind AI Reduces Google Data Centre Cooling Bill by
40%. https://deepmind.com/blog/
[22] D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic
deepmind-ai-reduces-google-data-centre-cooling-bill-40/.
optimization. CoRR, abs/1412.6980, 2014.
[3] Statistical Workload Injector for MapReduce . https:
[23] H. Mao, M. Alizadeh, I. Menache, and S. Kandula. Resource
//github.com/SWIMProjectUCB/SWIM/wiki.
management with deep reinforcement learning. In Proceedings
of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, pages
[4] M. Al-Fares, A. Loukissas, and A. Vahdat. A scalable,
50–56. ACM, 2016.
commodity data center network architecture. In Proceedings of
ACM SIGCOMM 2008.
[24] V. Mnih, A. P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. P. Lillicrap,
T. Harley, D. Silver, and K. Kavukcuoglu. Asynchronous
[5] M. Al-Fares, A. Loukissas, and A. Vahdat. A scalable,
methods for deep reinforcement learning. In International
commodity data center network architecture. In Proceedings of
Conference on Machine Learning, 2016.
ACM SIGCOMM 2008.
[25] V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Graves, I. Antonoglou,
[6] M. Al-Fares, S. Radhakrishnan, B. Raghavan, N. Huang, and
D. Wierstra, and M. Riedmiller. Playing atari with deep
A. Vahdat. Hedera: Dynamic flow scheduling for data center
reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.5602, 2013.
networks. In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI 2010.
[26] J. C. Mogul, A. AuYoung, S. Banerjee, L. Popa, J. Lee,
[7] A. AuYoung, Y. Ma, S. Banerjee, J. Lee, P. Sharma, Y. Turner,
J. Mudigonda, P. Sharma, and Y. Turner. Corybantic: Towards
C. Liang, and J. C. Mogul. Democratic resolution of resource
the modular composition of sdn control programs. In HotNets,
conflicts between sdn control programs. In CoNext, 2014.
2013.
[8] T. Benson, A. An, A. Akella, and M. Zhang. Microte: The case
[27] C. Monsanto, N. Foster, R. Harrison, and D. Walker. A
for fine-grained traffic engineering in data centers. In
compiler and run-time system for network programming
Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT 2011.
languages. In Proceedings of ACM POPL 2012.
[9] J. A. Boyan, M. L. Littman, et al. Packet routing in dynamically
[28] S. Nedevschi, L. Popa, G. Iannaccone, S. Ratnasamy, and
changing networks: A reinforcement learning approach.
D. Wetherall. Reducing network energy consumption via
Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
sleeping and rate-adaptation. In Proceedings of the 5th USENIX
671–671, 1994.
Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation,
[10] A. Das, C. Lumezanu, Y. Zhang, V. K. Singh, G. Jiang, and
NSDI’08, pages 323–336, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2008. USENIX
C. Yu. Transparent and flexible network management for big
Association.
data processing in the cloud. In Proceedings of ACM HotCloud
[29] S. Prabhu, M. Dong, T. Meng, P. B. Godfrey, and M. Caesar.
2013.
Let me rephrase that: Transparent optimization in sdns. In
[11] N. Farrington, G. Porter, S. Radhakrishnan, H. H. Bazzaz,
Proceedings of ACM SOSR 2017.
V. Subramanya, Y. Fainman, G. Papen, and A. Vahdat. Helios:
[30] J. Schulman, P. Moritz, S. Levine, M. Jordan, and P. Abbeel.
A hybrid electrical/optical switch architecture for modular data
High-dimensional continuous control using generalized
centers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2010.
advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438, 2015.
[12] N. Foster, R. Harrison, M. J. Freedman, C. Monsanto,
[31] D. Silver, A. Huang, C. J. Maddison, A. Guez, L. Sifre, G. Van
J. Rexford, A. Story, and D. Walker. Frenetic: A network
Den Driessche, J. Schrittwieser, I. Antonoglou,
programming language. SIGPLAN Not., 46(9):279–291, Sept.
V. Panneershelvam, M. Lanctot, et al. Mastering the game of go
2011.
with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature,
[13] S. Ghorbani, B. Godfrey, Y. Ganjali, and A. Firoozshahian.
529(7587):484–489, 2016.
[32] N. Usunier, G. Synnaeve, Z. Lin, and S. Chintala. Episodic
exploration for deep deterministic policies: An application to
starcraft micromanagement tasks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1609.02993, 2016.
[33] G. Wang, D. G. Andersen, M. Kaminsky, K. Papagiannaki,
T. Ng, M. Kozuch, and M. Ryan. c-through: Part-time optics in
data centers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2010.
[34] R. J. Williams. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms
for connectionist reinforcement learning. Machine learning,
8(3-4):229–256, 1992.
[35] D. Zhuo, M. M. Ghobadi, R. Mahajan, K.-T. Forster,
A. Krishnamurthy, and T. Anderson. Understanding and
mitigating packet corruption in data center networks. page 14.
ACM SIGCOMM, August 2017.
| 2cs.AI
|
arXiv:1507.06792v2 [stat.ME] 31 Mar 2017
Efficient Estimation for Diffusions Sampled at High
Frequency Over a Fixed Time Interval
Nina Munkholt Jakobsen
Michael Sørensen∗
Department of Mathematical Sciences
University of Copenhagen
Universitetsparken 5
DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø
Denmark
[email protected]
Department of Mathematical Sciences
University of Copenhagen
Universitetsparken 5
DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø
Denmark
[email protected]
April 3, 2017
Abstract
Parametric estimation for diffusion processes is considered for high frequency observations over a fixed time interval. The processes solve stochastic differential equations with an unknown parameter in the diffusion coefficient. We find easily verified
conditions on approximate martingale estimating functions under which estimators are
consistent, rate optimal, and efficient under high frequency (in-fill) asymptotics. The
asymptotic distributions of the estimators are shown to be normal variance-mixtures,
where the mixing distribution generally depends on the full sample path of the diffusion process over the observation time interval. Utilising the concept of stable convergence, we also obtain the more easily applicable result that for a suitable data
dependent normalisation, the estimators converge in distribution to a standard normal
distribution. The theory is illustrated by a simulation study comparing an efficient and
a non-efficient estimating function for an ergodic and a non-ergodic model.
Key words: Approximate martingale estimating functions, discrete time sampling of
diffusions, in-fill asymptotics, normal variance-mixtures, optimal rate, random Fisher
information, stable convergence, stochastic differential equation.
Running title: Efficient Estimation for High Frequency SDE Data.
1
1
Introduction
Diffusions given by stochastic differential equations find application in a number of fields
where they are used to describe phenomena which evolve continuously in time. Some examples include agronomy (Pedersen, 2000), biology (Favetto and Samson, 2010), finance
(Merton, 1971; Vasicek, 1977; Cox et al., 1985; Larsen and Sørensen, 2007) and neuroscience (Ditlevsen and Lansky, 2006; Picchini et al., 2008; Bibbona et al., 2010).
While the models have continuous-time dynamics, data are only observable in discrete
time, thus creating a demand for statistical methods to analyse such data. With the exception of some simple cases, the likelihood function is not explicitly known, and a large
variety of alternate estimation procedures have been proposed in the literature, see e.g.
Sørensen (2004) and Kessler et al. (2012). Parametric methods include the following.
Maximum likelihood-type estimation, primarily using Gaussian approximations to the likelihood function, was considered by Prakasa Rao (1983), Florens-Zmirou (1989), Yoshida
(1992), Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993), Kessler (1997), Jacod (2006), Gloter and Sørensen
(2009) and Uchida and Yoshida (2013). Analytical expansions of the transition densities
were investigated by Aït-Sahalia (2002, 2008) and Li (2013), while approximations to the
score function were studied by Bibby and Sørensen (1995), Kessler and Sørensen (1999),
Jacobsen (2001, 2002), Uchida (2004), and Sørensen (2010). Simulation-based likelihood
methods were developed by Pedersen (1995), Roberts and Stramer (2001), Durham and
Gallant (2002), Beskos et al. (2006, 2009), Golightly and Wilkinson (2006, 2008), Bladt
and Sørensen (2014), and Bladt et al. (2016).
A large part of the parametric estimators proposed in the literature can be treated within
the framework of approximate martingale estimating functions, see the review in Sørensen
(2012). In this paper, we derive easily verified conditions on such estimating functions that
imply rate optimality and efficiency under a high frequency asymptotic scenario, and thus
contribute to providing clarity and a systematic approach to this area of statistics.
Specifically, the paper concerns parametric estimation for stochastic differential equations
of the form
dXt = a(Xt ) dt + b(Xt ; θ) dWt ,
(1.1)
where (Wt )t≥0 is a standard Wiener process. The drift and diffusion coefficients a and b are
deterministic functions, and θ is the unknown parameter to be estimated. The drift function
a needs not be known, but as examples in this paper show, knowledge of a can be used
in the construction of estimating functions. For ease of exposition, Xt and θ are both assumed to be one-dimensional. The extension of our results to a multivariate parameter is
straightforward, and it is expected that multivariate diffusions can be treated in a similar
way. For n ∈ N, we consider observations (Xt0n , Xt1n , . . . , Xtnn ) in the time interval [0, 1], at
discrete, equidistant time-points tin = i/n, i = 0, 1, . . . , n. We investigate the high frequency
scenario where n → ∞. The choice of the time-interval [0, 1] is not restrictive since results
generalise to other compact intervals by suitable rescaling of the drift and diffusion coef2
ficients. The drift coefficient does not depend on any parameter, because parameters that
appear only in the drift cannot be estimated consistently in our asymptotic scenario.
It was shown by Dohnal (1987) and Gobet (2001) that under the asymptotic scenario con√
sidered here, the model (1.1) is locally asymptotic mixed normal with rate n and random
asymptotic Fisher information
!2
Z 1
∂θ b(X s ; θ)
I(θ) = 2
ds.
(1.2)
b(X s ; θ)
0
√
Thus, a consistent estimator θ̂n is rate optimal if n(θ̂n − θ0 ) converges in distribution
to a non-degenerate random variable as n → ∞, where θ0 is the true parameter value.
The estimator is efficient if the limit may be written on the form I(θ0 )−1/2 Z, where Z is
standard normal distributed and independent of I(θ0 ). The concept of local asymptotic
mixed normality was introduced by Jeganathan (1982), and is discussed in e.g. Le Cam
and Yang (2000, Chapter 6) and Jacod (2010).
Estimation for the model (1.1) under the high frequency asymptotic scenario described
above was considered by Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993, 1994). These authors proposed
estimators based on a class of contrast functions that were only allowed to depend on the
−1/2
n ; θ) and ∆
n ). The estimators
observations and the parameter through b2 (Xti−1
(Xtin − Xti−1
n
were shown to be rate optimal, and an efficient contrast function was identified. Dohnal
(1987) gave estimators for particular cases of the model (1.1). Apart from one instance,
these estimators are not of the type investigated by Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993, 1994),
but all apart from one are covered by the theory in the present paper.
In this paper, we investigate estimators based on the extensive class of approximate martingale estimating functions
Gn (θ) =
n
X
n ; θ)
g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
n ; θ) |
with ∆n = 1/n, where the real-valued function g(t, y, x; θ) satisfies that Eθ (g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
κ
n ) is of order ∆ for some κ ≥ 2. Estimators are obtained as solutions to the estimatXti−1
n
ing equation Gn (θ) = 0 and are referred to as Gn -estimators. Exact martingale estimating
functions, where Gn (θ) is a martingale, constitute a particular case that is not covered by
the theory in Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993, 1994). An example is the maximum likeli√
hood estimator for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with a(x) = −x and b(x; θ) = θ, for
which g(t, y, x; θ) = (y − e−t x)2 − 21 θ(1 − e−2t ). A simpler example of an estimating function
for the same Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process that is covered by our theory, but is not of the
Genon-Catalot & Jacod-type, is given by g(t, y, x; θ) = (y − (1 − t)x)2 − θt.
The class of approximate martingale estimating functions was also studied by Sørensen
(2010), who considered high frequency observations in an increasing time interval for a
model like (1.1) where also the drift coefficient depends on a parameter. Specifically, the
observation times were tin = i∆n with ∆n → 0 and n∆n → ∞. Simple conditions on
g for rate optimality and efficiency were found under the infinite horizon high frequency
3
asymptotics. To some extent, the methods of proof in the present paper are similar to those
in Sørensen (2010). However, while ergodicity of the diffusion process played a central
role in that paper, this property is not needed here. Another important difference is that
expansions of a higher order are needed in the present paper, which complicates the proofs
considerably. Furthermore, the theory in the current paper requires a more complicated
version of the central limit theorem for martingales, and we need the concept of stable
convergence in distribution, in order to obtain practically applicable convergence results.
First, we establish results on existence and uniqueness of consistent Gn -estimators. We
√
show that n(θ̂n − θ0 ) converges in distribution to a normal variance-mixture, which implies rate optimality. The limit distribution may be represented by the product W(θ0 )Z of
independent random variables, where Z is standard normal distributed. The random variable W(θ0 ) is generally non-degenerate, and depends on the entire path of the diffusion
process over the time-interval [0, 1]. Normal variance-mixtures were also obtained as the
asymptotic distributions of the estimators of Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993). These distributions appear as limit distributions in comparable non-parametric settings as well, e.g.
when estimating integrated volatility (Jacod and Protter, 1998; Mykland and Zhang, 2006)
or the squared diffusion coefficient (Florens-Zmirou, 1993; Jacod, 2000).
Rate optimality is ensured by the condition that
∂y g(0, x, x; θ) = 0
(1.3)
for all x in the state space of the diffusion process, and all parameter values θ. Here
∂y g(0, x, x; θ) denotes the first derivative of g(0, y, x; θ) with respect to y evaluated in y = x.
The same condition was found in Sørensen (2010) for rate optimality of an estimator of the
parameter in the diffusion coefficient, and it is one of the conditions for small ∆-optimality;
see Jacobsen (2001, 2002).
Due to its dependence on (X s ) s∈[0,1] , the limit distribution is difficult to use for statistical
applications, such as constructing confidence intervals and test statistics. Therefore, we
b that converges in probability to W(θ0 ). Using the stable convergence
construct a statistic W
√ n
in distribution of n(θ̂n − θ0 ) towards W(θ0 )Z, we derive the more easily applicable result
√
b n−1 (θ̂n − θ0 ) converges in distribution to a standard normal distribution.
that n W
The additional condition that
∂2y g(0, x, x; θ) = Kθ
∂θ b2 (x; θ)
b4 (x; θ)
(1.4)
(Kθ , 0) for all x in the state space, and all parameter values θ, ensures efficiency of Gn estimators. The same condition was obtained by Sørensen (2010) in his infinite horizon
scenario for efficiency of estimators of parameters in the diffusion coefficient. It is also
identical to a condition given by Jacobsen (2002) for small ∆-optimality. The identity of
the conditions implies that examples of approximate martingale estimating functions which
are rate optimal and efficient in our asymptotic scenario may be found in Jacobsen (2002)
and Sørensen (2010). In particular, estimating functions that are optimal in the sense of
Godambe and Heyde (1987) are rate optimal and efficient under weak regularity conditions.
4
The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 presents definitions, notation and terminology
used throughout the paper, as well as the main assumptions. Section 3 states and discusses
our main results, while Section 4 presents a simulation study illustrating the results. Section
5 contains main lemmas used to prove the main theorem, and proofs of the main theorem
and the lemmas. Appendix A consists of auxiliary technical results, some of them with
proofs.
2
2.1
Preliminaries
Model and Observations
Let (Ω, F ) be a measurable space supporting a real-valued random variable U, and an independent standard Wiener process W = (Wt )t≥0 . Let (Ft )t≥0 denote the filtration generated
by U and W.
Consider the stochastic differential equation
dXt = a(Xt ) dt + b(Xt ; θ) dWt ,
X0 = U ,
(2.1)
for θ ∈ Θ ⊆ R. The state space of the solution is assumed to be an open interval X ⊆ R,
and the drift and diffusion coefficients, a : X → R and b : X × Θ → R, are assumed to be
known, deterministic functions. Let (Pθ )θ∈Θ be a family of probability measures on (Ω, F )
such that X = (Xt )t≥0 solves (2.1) under Pθ , and let Eθ denote expectation under Pθ .
Let tin = i∆n with ∆n = 1/n for i ∈ N0 , n ∈ N. For each n ∈ N, X is assumed to be sampled
at times tin , i = 0, 1, . . . , n, yielding the observations (Xt0n , Xt1n , . . . , Xtnn ). Let Gn,i denote the
σ-algebra generated by the observations (Xt0n , Xt1n , . . . , Xtin ), with Gn = Gn,n .
2.2
Polynomial Growth
In the following, to avoid cumbersome notation, C denotes a generic, strictly positive, realvalued constant. Often, the notation Cu is used to emphasise that the constant depends
on u in some unspecified manner, where u may be, e.g., a number or a set of parameter
values. Note that, for example, in an expression of the form Cu (1 + |x|Cu ), the factor Cu and
the exponent Cu need not be equal. Generic constants Cu often depend (implicitly) on the
unknown true parameter value θ0 , but never on the sample size n.
A function f : [0, 1] × X2 × Θ → R is said to be of polynomial growth in x and y, uniformly
for t ∈ [0, 1] and θ in compact, convex sets, if for each compact, convex set K ⊆ Θ there
exist constants C K > 0 such that
sup
t∈[0,1], θ∈K
| f (t, y, x; θ)| ≤ C K (1 + |x|C K + |y|C K )
for x, y ∈ X.
pol
Definition 2.1. C p,q,r ([0, 1] × X2 × Θ) denotes the class of real-valued functions f (t, y, x; θ)
which satisfy that
5
j
(i) f and the mixed partial derivatives ∂it ∂y ∂kθ f (t, y, x; θ), i = 0, . . . , p, j = 0, . . . , q and
k = 0, . . . , r exist and are continuous on [0, 1] × X2 × Θ.
(ii) f and the mixed partial derivatives from (i) are of polynomial growth in x and y,
uniformly for t ∈ [0, 1] and θ in compact, convex sets.
pol
pol
pol
pol
Similarly, the classes C p,r ([0, 1] × X × Θ), Cq,r (X2 × Θ), Cq,r (X × Θ) and Cq (X) are defined
for functions of the form f (t, x; θ), f (y, x; θ), f (y; θ) and f (y), respectively.
Note that in Definition 2.1, differentiability of f with respect to x is never required.
For the duration of this paper, R(t, y, x; θ) denotes a generic, real-valued function defined
on [0, 1] × X2 × Θ, which is of polynomial growth in x and y uniformly for t ∈ [0, 1] and
θ in compact, convex sets. The function R(t, y, x; θ) may depend (implicitly) on θ0 . Functions R(t, x; θ), R(y, x; θ) and R(t, x) are defined correspondingly. The notation Rλ (t, x; θ)
indicates that R(t, x; θ) also depends on λ ∈ Θ in an unspecified way.
2.3
Approximate Martingale Estimating Functions
Definition 2.2. Let g(t, y, x; θ) be a real-valued function defined on [0, 1]×X2 ×Θ. Suppose
the existence of a constant κ ≥ 2, such that for all n ∈ N, i = 1, . . . , n, θ ∈ Θ,
n ).
n ; θ) | Xtn
(2.2)
= ∆κn Rθ (∆n , Xti−1
Eθ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
Then, the function
Gn (θ) =
n
X
n ; θ)
g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
(2.3)
i=1
is called an approximate martingale estimating function. In particular, when (2.2) is satisfied with Rθ (t, x) ≡ 0, (2.3) is referred to as a martingale estimating function.
By the Markov property of X, it follows that if Rθ (t, x) ≡ 0, then (Gn,i )1≤i≤n defined by
Gn,i (θ) =
i
X
g(∆n , Xtnj , Xtnj−1 ; θ)
j=1
is a zero-mean, real-valued (Gn,i )1≤i≤n -martingale under Pθ for each n ∈ N. The score function of the observations (Xt0n , Xt1n , . . . , Xtnn ) is a martingale estimating function under weak
regularity conditions, and an approximate martingale estimating function can be viewed as
an approximation to the score function.
A Gn -estimator θ̂n is essentially obtained as a solution to the estimating equation Gn (θ) = 0.
A more precise definition is given in the following Definition 2.3. Here we make the ωdependence explicit by writing Gn (θ, ω) and θ̂n (ω).
Definition 2.3. Let Gn (θ, ω) be an approximate martingale estimating function as defined
in Definition 2.2. Put Θ∞ = Θ ∪ {∞} and let
Dn = {ω ∈ Ω | Gn (θ, ω) = 0 has at least one solution θ ∈ Θ} .
6
A Gn -estimator θ̂n (ω) is any Gn -measurable function Ω → Θ∞ which satisfies that for Pθ0 almost all ω, θ̂n (ω) ∈ Θ and Gn (θ̂n (ω), ω) = 0 if ω ∈ Dn , while θ̂n (ω) = ∞ if ω < Dn .
For any Mn , 0, the estimating functions Gn (θ) and MnGn (θ) yield identical estimators of
θ and are therefore referred to as versions of each other. For any given estimating function,
it is sufficient that there exists a version of the function which satisfies the assumptions of
this paper, in order to draw conclusions about the resulting estimators. In particular, we can
multiply by a function of ∆n .
2.4
Assumptions
We make the following assumptions about the stochastic differential equation.
Assumption 2.4. The parameter set Θ is a non-empty, open subset of R. Under the probability measure Pθ , the continuous, (Ft )t≥0 -adapted Markov process X = (Xt )t≥0 solves a
stochastic differential equation of the form (2.1), the coefficients of which satisfy that
pol
a(y) ∈ C6 (X)
pol
b(y; θ) ∈ C6,2 (X × Θ) .
and
The following holds for all θ ∈ Θ.
(i) For all y ∈ X, b2 (y; θ) > 0.
(ii) There exists a real-valued constant Cθ > 0 such that for all x, y ∈ X,
|a(x) − a(y)| + |b(x; θ) − b(y; θ)| ≤ Cθ |x − y| .
(iii) U has moments of any order.
The global Lipschitz condition, Assumption 2.4.(ii), ensures that a unique solution X exists.
The Lipschitz condition and (iii) imply that supt∈[0,1] Eθ (|Xt |m ) < ∞ for all m ∈ N. Assumption 2.4 is very similar to the corresponding Condition 2.1 of Sørensen (2010). However,
an important difference is that in the current paper, X is not required to be ergodic. Here,
law of large numbers-type results are proved by what is, in essence, the convergence of
Riemann sums.
We make the following assumptions about the estimating function.
Assumption 2.5. The function g(t, y, x; θ) satisfies (2.2) for some κ ≥ 2, thus defining an
approximate martingale estimating function by (2.3). Moreover,
pol
g(t, y, x; θ) ∈ C3,8,2 ([0, 1] × X2 × Θ) ,
and the following holds for all θ ∈ Θ.
(i) For all x ∈ X, ∂y g(0, x, x; θ) = 0.
7
(ii) The expansion
g(∆, y, x; θ) = g(0, y, x; θ) + ∆g(1) (y, x; θ) + 12 ∆2 g(2) (y, x; θ) + 16 ∆3 g(3) (y, x; θ)
+ ∆4 R(∆, y, x; θ)
(2.4)
holds for all ∆ ∈ [0, 1] and x, y ∈ X, where g( j) (y, x; θ) denotes the j0 th partial
derivative of g(t, y, x; θ) with respect to t, evaluated in t = 0.
Assumption 2.5.(i) was referred to by Sørensen (2010) as Jacobsen’s condition, as it is
one of the conditions for small ∆-optimality in the sense of Jacobsen (2001), see Jacobsen
(2002). The assumption ensures rate optimality of the estimators in this paper, and of the
estimators of the parameters in the diffusion coefficient in Sørensen (2010).
The assumptions of polynomial growth and existence and boundedness of all moments
serve to simplify the exposition and proofs, and could be relaxed.
2.5
The Infinitesimal Generator
pol
For λ ∈ Θ, the infinitesimal generator Lλ is defined for all functions f (y) ∈ C2 (X) by
Lλ f (y) = a(y)∂y f (y) + 21 b2 (y; λ)∂2y f (y) .
pol
For f (t, y, x, θ) ∈ C0,2,0,0 ([0, 1] × X2 × Θ), let
Lλ f (t, y, x; θ) = a(y)∂y f (t, y, x; θ) + 21 b2 (y; λ)∂2y f (t, y, x; θ) .
(2.5)
Often, the notation Lλ f (t, y, x; θ) = Lλ ( f (t; θ))(y, x) is used, so e.g. Lλ ( f (0; θ))(x, x) means
Lλ f (0, y, x; θ) evaluated in y = x. In this paper the infinitesimal generator is particularly
useful because of the following result.
Lemma 2.6. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 holds, and that for some k ∈ N0 ,
pol
a(y) ∈ C2k (X) ,
pol
b(y; θ) ∈ C2k,0 (X × Θ)
and
pol
f (y, x; θ) ∈ C2(k+1),0 (X2 × Θ) .
Then, for 0 ≤ t ≤ t + ∆ ≤ 1 and λ ∈ Θ,
Eλ ( f (Xt+∆ , Xt ; θ) | Xt )
=
k
X
∆i
i=0
i!
Liλ f (Xt , Xt ; θ)
+
∆ Z u1
Z
uk
Z
···
0
0
0
Eλ Lk+1
f
(X
,
X
;
θ)
|
X
duk+1 · · · du1
t+u
t
t
k+1
λ
where, furthermore,
Z
∆ Z u1
Z
···
0
0
0
uk
Eλ Lk+1
f
(X
,
X
;
θ)
|
X
duk+1 · · · du1 = ∆k+1 Rλ (∆, Xt ; θ) .
t+u
t
t
k+1
λ
8
The expansion of the conditional expectation in powers of ∆ in the first part of the lemma
corresponds to Lemma 1 in Florens-Zmirou (1989) and Lemma 4 in Dacunha-Castelle and
Florens-Zmirou (1986). It may be proven by induction on k using Itô’s formula, see, e.g.,
the proof of Sørensen (2012, Lemma 1.10). The characterisation of the remainder term
follows by applying Corollary A.5 to Lk+1
λ f , see the proof of Kessler (1997, Lemma 1).
For concrete models, Lemma 2.6 is useful for verifying the approximate martingale property (2.2) and for creating approximate martingale estimating functions. In combination
with (2.2), the lemma is key to proving the following Lemma 2.7, which reveals two important properties of approximate martingale estimating functions.
Lemma 2.7. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4 and 2.5 hold. Then
g(0, x, x; θ) = 0
and
g(1) (x, x; θ) = −Lθ (g(0, θ))(x, x)
for all x ∈ X and θ ∈ Θ.
Lemma 2.7 corresponds to Lemma 2.3 of Sørensen (2010), to which we refer for details on
the proof.
3
Main Results
Section 3.1 presents the main theorem of this paper, which establishes existence, uniqueness and asymptotic distribution results for rate optimal estimators based on approximate
martingale estimating functions. In Section 3.2 a condition is given, which ensures that the
rate optimal estimators are also efficient, and efficient estimators are discussed.
3.1
Main Theorem
The final assumption needed for the main theorem is as follows.
Assumption 3.1. The following holds Pθ -almost surely for all θ ∈ Θ.
(i) For all λ , θ,
1
Z
0
b2 (X s ; θ) − b2 (X s ; λ) ∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; λ) ds , 0 ,
(ii)
1
Z
0
∂θ b2 (X s ; θ)∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds , 0 ,
(iii)
1
Z
0
2
b4 (X s ; θ) ∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds , 0 .
9
Assumption 3.1 can be difficult to check in practice because it involves the full sample path
of X over the interval [0, 1]. It requires, in particular, that for all θ ∈ Θ, with Pθ -probability
one, t 7→ b2 (Xt ; θ) − b2 (Xt ; λ) is not Lebesgue-almost surely zero when λ , θ. As noted
by Genon-Catalot and Jacod (1993), this requirement holds true (by the continuity of the
function) if, for example, X0 = U is degenerate at x0 , and b2 (x0 ; θ) , b2 (x0 ; λ) for all θ , λ.
For an efficient estimating function, Assumption 3.1 reduces to conditions on X with no further conditions on the estimating function, see the next section. Specifically, the conditions
involve only the squared diffusion coefficient b2 (x; θ) and its derivative ∂θ b2 .
Theorem 3.2. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4, 2.5 and 3.1 hold. Then,
(i) there exists a consistent Gn -estimator θ̂n . Choose any compact, convex set K ⊆ Θ
with θ0 ∈ int K, where int K denotes the interior of K. Then, the consistent Gn estimator θ̂n is eventually unique in K, in the sense that for any Gn -estimator θ̃n with
Pθ0 (θ̃n ∈ K) → 1 as n → ∞, it holds that Pθ0 (θ̂n , θ̃n ) → 0 as n → ∞.
(ii) for any consistent Gn -estimator θ̂n , it holds that
√
D
n(θ̂n − θ0 ) −→ W(θ0 )Z .
(3.1)
The limit distribution is a normal variance-mixture, where Z is standard normal
distributed, and independent of W(θ0 ) given by
1
Z
W(θ0 ) =
0
1 4
2 b (X s ; θ0 )
1
Z
0
2
∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 )
!1/2
ds
.
(3.2)
2
2
1
2 ∂θ b (X s ; θ0 )∂y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 ) ds
(iii) for any consistent Gn -estimator θ̂n ,
bn = −
W
1/2
n
1 X
2
n ; θ̂n )
g (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
∆n i=1
n
X
(3.3)
n ; θ̂n )
∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
P
b n −→ W(θ0 ), and
satisfies that W
√
D
bn−1 (θ̂n − θ0 ) −→
nW
N(0, 1) .
The proof of Theorem 3.2 is given in Section 5.1.
10
Dohnal (1987) and Gobet (2001) showed local asymptotic mixed normality with rate
so Theorem 3.2 establishes rate optimality of Gn -estimators.
√
n,
Observe that the limit distribution in Theorem 3.2.(ii) generally depends on not only the
unknown parameter θ0 , but also on the concrete realisation of the sample path t 7→ Xt
over [0, 1], which is only partially observed. Note also that a variance-mixture of normal
distributions can be very different from a Gaussian distribution. It can be much more heavytailed and even have no moments. Theorem 3.2.(iii) is therefore important as it yields a
standard normal limit distribution, which is more useful in practical applications.
3.2
Efficiency
Under the assumptions of Theorem 3.2, the following additional condition ensures efficiency of a consistent Gn -estimator.
Assumption 3.3. Suppose that for each θ ∈ Θ, there exists a constant Kθ , 0 such that for
all x ∈ X,
∂2y g(0, x, x; θ) = Kθ
∂θ b2 (x; θ)
.
b4 (x; θ)
Dohnal (1987) and Gobet (2001) showed that the local asymptotic mixed normality property holds within the framework considered here with random Fisher information I(θ0 )
given by (1.2). Thus, a Gn -estimator θ̂n is efficient if (3.1) holds with W(θ0 ) = I(θ0 )−1/2 ,
and the following Corollary 3.4 may easily be verified.
Corollary 3.4. Suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 3.2 and Assumption 3.3 hold.
Then, any consistent Gn -estimator is also efficient.
It follows from Theorem 3.2 and Lemma 5.1 that if Assumption 3.3 holds, and if Gn is
normalized such that Kθ = 1, then
√
where
1
D
bn2 (θ̂n − θ0 ) −→ N(0, 1) ,
nI
n
X
bn = 1
n ; θ̂n ).
I
g2 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
∆n i=1
It was noted in Section 2.3 that not necessarily all versions of a particular estimating function satisfy the conditions of this paper, even though they lead to the same estimator. Thus,
an estimating function is said to be efficient, if there exists a version which satisfies the
conditions of Corollary 3.4. The same goes for rate optimality.
Assumption 3.3 is identical to the condition for efficiency of estimators of parameters in the
diffusion coefficient in Sørensen (2010), and to one of the conditions for small ∆-optimality
given in Jacobsen (2002).
11
Under suitable regularity conditions on the diffusion coefficient b, the function
ḡ(t, y, x; θ) =
∂θ b2 (x; θ)
2
2
(y
−
x)
−
tb
(x;
θ)
b4 (x; θ)
(3.4)
yields an example of an efficient estimating function. The approximate martingale property
(2.2) can be verified by Lemma 2.6.
When adapted to the current framework, the contrast functions investigated by GenonCatalot and Jacod (1993) have the form
Un (θ) =
n
1X 2
−1/2
n ; θ), ∆
n ) ,
f b (Xti−1
(Xtin − Xti−1
n
n i=1
for functions f (v, w) satisfying certain conditions. For the contrast function identified as
efficient by Genon-Catalot and Jacod, f (v, w) = log v + w2 /v. Using that ∆n = 1/n, it is
P
n ; θ)
then seen that their efficient contrast function is of the form Ūn (θ) = ni=1 ū(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
with
ū(t, y, x; θ) = t log b2 (x; θ) + (y − x)2 /b2 (x; θ)
and ∂θ ū(t, y, x; θ) = −ḡ(t, y, x; θ). In other words, it corresponds to a version of the efficient
approximate martingale estimating function given by (3.4). The same contrast function
was considered by Uchida and Yoshida (2013) in the framework of a more general class of
stochastic differential equations.
A problem of considerable practical interest is how to construct estimating functions that
are rate optimal and efficient, i.e. estimating functions satisfying Assumptions 2.5.(i) and
3.3. Being the same as the conditions for small ∆-optimality, the assumptions are, for
example, satisfied for martingale estimating functions constructed by Jacobsen (2002).
As discussed by Sørensen (2010), the rate optimality and efficiency conditions are also satisfied by Godambe-Heyde optimal approximate martingale estimating functions. Consider
martingale estimating functions of the form
g(t, y, x; θ) = a(x, t; θ)∗ f (y; θ) − φtθ f (x; θ) ,
where a and f are two-dimensional, ∗ denotes transposition, and φtθ f (x; θ) = Eθ ( f (Xt ; θ) |
X0 = x). Suppose that f satisfies appropriate (weak) conditions. Let ā be the weight
function for which the estimating function is optimal in the sense of Godambe and Heyde
(1987), see e.g. Heyde (1997) or Sørensen (2012, Section 1.11). It follows by an argument
analogous to the proof of Theorem 4.5 in Sørensen (2010) that the estimating function with
g(t, y, x; θ) = tā(x, t; θ)∗ [ f (y; θ) − φtθ f (x; θ)]
satisfies Assumptions 2.5.(i) and 3.3, and is thus rate optimal and efficient. As there is a
simple formula for ā (see Section 1.11.1 of Sørensen (2012)), this provides a way of constructing a large number of efficient estimating functions. The result also holds if φtθ f (x; θ)
and the conditional moments in the formula for ā are suitably approximated by the help of
Lemma 2.6.
12
Remark 3.5. Suppose for a moment that the diffusion coefficient of (2.1) has the form
b2 (x; θ) = h(x)k(θ) for strictly positive functions h and k, with Assumption 2.4 satisfied. This holds true, e.g., for a number of Pearson diffusions, including the (stationary)
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and square root processes. (See Forman and Sørensen (2008) for more
on Pearson diffusions.) Then I(θ0 ) = ∂θ k(θ0 )2 /(2k2 (θ0 )). In this case, under the assump√
tions of Corollary 3.4, an efficient Gn -estimator θ̂n satisfies that n(θ̂n − θ0 ) −→ Y in distribution where Y is normal distributed with mean zero and variance 2k2 (θ0 )/∂θ k(θ0 )2 , i.e.
the limit distribution is not a normal variance-mixture depending on (Xt )t∈[0,1] . Note also
that when b2 (x; θ) = h(x)k(θ) and Assumption 3.3 holds, then Assumption 3.1 is satisfied
when, e.g., ∂θ k(θ) > 0 or ∂θ k(θ) < 0.
◦
4
Simulation study
This section presents a simulation study illustrating the theory in the previous section. An
efficient and an inefficient estimating function are compared for two models, an ergodic and
a non-ergodic model. For both models the limit distributions of the consistent estimators
are non-degenerate normal variance-mixtures.
First, consider the stochastic differential equation
dXt = −2Xt dt + (θ + Xt2 )−1/2 dWt , X0 = 0,
(4.1)
where θ ∈ (0, ∞) is an unknown parameter.
The solution
X is ergodic with invariant probability density proportional to exp −2θx2 − x4 θ + x2 , x ∈ R. The process satisfies Assumption 2.4. We compare the two estimating functions given by
n
X
Gn (θ) =
g(∆n , X , X
tin
n
ti−1
; θ)
and
Hn (θ) =
i=1
n
X
n ; θ)
h(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
where
g(t, y, x; θ) = (y − (1 − 2t)x)2 − (θ + x2 )−1 t
h(t, y, x; θ) = (θ + x2 )10 (y − (1 − 2t)x)2 − (θ + x2 )9 t .
Both g and h satisfy Assumptions 2.5 and 3.1. Moreover, g satisfies the condition for
efficiency, while h is not efficient.
Let WG (θ0 ) and WH (θ0 ) be given by (3.2), that is
1
Z
WG (θ0 ) = −
Z
1
2
0
1
!−1/2
1
ds
and WH (θ0 ) = −
(θ0 + X s2 )2
!1/2
2(θ0 +
0
1
Z
0
X s2 )18 ds
. (4.2)
(θ0 +
X s2 )8 ds
Numerical calculations and simulations were done in R 3.1.3 (R Core Team, 2014). First,
m = 104 trajectories of the process X given by (4.1) were simulated over the time-interval
13
●
●
●
4
2
0
−2
−4
●
●
●
−2
0
2
4
4
●
●●
●●
0
2
4
●
●
●●●●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
2
0
●
●●
●
●
●
−4
−4
2
0
−2
−2
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
●
−4
4
−4
●
●
●●●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●●
●
●
−2
−4
−2
0
2
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
−4
−2
0
2
4
−4
−2
0
2
4
bG,n (left) and Z
bH,n (right) to the N(0, 1) distribution in the
Figure 1: QQ-plots comparing Z
case of the ergodic model (4.1) for n = 103 (above) and n = 104 (below).
[0, 1] with θ0 = 1. These simulations were performed using the Milstein scheme as implemented in the R-package sde (Iacus, 2014) with step size 10−5 . The simulations were
subsampled to obtain samples sizes of n = 103 and n = 104 . Let θ̂G,n and θ̂H,n denote
estimates of θ obtained by solving the equations Gn (θ) = 0 and Hn (θ) = 0 numerically, on
bG,n and W
b H,n were calculated by (3.3).
the interval [0.01, 1, 99]. Using these estimates, W
For n = 103 , θ̂H,n could not be computed for 30 of the m = 104 sample paths. For n = 104 ,
and for the efficient estimator θ̂G,n there were no problems.
Figure 1 shows QQ-plots of
bG,n =
Z
√
b −1 (θ̂G,n − θ0 )
nW
G,n
and
bH,n =
Z
√
b −1 (θ̂H,n − θ0 ) ,
nW
H,n
compared with a standard normal distribution, for n = 103 and n = 104 respectively. These
QQ-plots suggest that, as n goes to infinity, the asymptotic distribution in Theorem 3.2.(iii)
becomes a good approximation faster in the efficient case than in the inefficient case.
14
0.25
5
0.20
4
0.15
3
0.10
2
0.00
0.05
1
0
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
5
10
15
eG
Figure 2: Approximation to the densities of WG (θ0 ) (left) and WH (θ0 ) (right) based on W
e
and WH in the case of the ergodic model (4.1).
Inserting θ0 = 1 into (4.2), the integrals in these expressions may be approximated by
Riemann sums, using each of the simulated trajectories of X (with sample size n = 104
eG and W
e H to
for maximal accuracy). This method yields a second set of approximations W
the realisations of the random variables WG (θ0 ) and WH (θ0 ), presumed to be more accurate
bG,104 and W
b H,104 as they utilise the true parameter value. The density function in R
than W
was used (with default arguments) to compute an approximation to the densities of WG (θ0 )
eG and W
eH.
and WH (θ0 ), using the approximate realisations W
It is seen from Figure 2 that the distribution of WH (θ0 ) is much more spread out than the
distribution of WG (θ0 ). This corresponds well to the limit distribution in Theorem 3.2.(ii)
being more spread out in the inefficient case than in the efficient case. Along the same lines,
√
√
Figure 3 shows similarly computed densities based on n(θ̂G,n − θ0 ) and n(θ̂H,n − θ0 ) for
n = 104 , which may be considered approximations to the densities of the normal variancemixture limit distributions in Theorem 3.2.(ii). These plots also illustrate that the limit
distribution of the inefficient estimator is more spread out than that of the efficient estimator.
Now, consider the stochastic differential equation
dXt = 2Xt dt + (θ + Xt2 )−1/2 dWt , X0 = 0.
(4.3)
For this model, the solution X is not ergodic, but again Assumption 2.4 holds. We compare
the two estimating functions given by
g(t, y, x; θ) = (y − (1 + 2t)x)2 − (θ + x2 )−1 t
h(t, y, x; θ) = (θ + x2 )10 (y − (1 + 2t)x)2 − (θ + x2 )9 t .
For both g and f Assumptions 2.5 and 3.1 hold, and g is efficient, while h is not.
15
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
−20
−10
0
10
20
√
√
Figure 3: Estimated densities of n(θ̂G,n − θ0 ) (solid curve) and n(θ̂H,n − θ0 ) (dashed
curve) for n = 104 in the case of the ergodic model (4.1).
Simulations were carried out in the same manner as for the ergodic model. In the nonergodic case, an estimator was again found for every sample path when the efficient estimating function given by g was used. For the inefficient estimating function given by
h, there was no solution to the estimating equation (in [0.01, 1.99]) in 14% of the samples for n = 104 and in 39 % of the samples for n = 103 . Figure 4 shows QQ-plots of
√
√
bG,n = n W
b −1 (θ̂G,n − θ0 ) and Z
bH,n = n W
b −1 (θ̂H,n − θ0 ) compared with a standard normal
Z
G,n
H,n
distribution, for n = 103 and n = 104 respectively. These QQ-plots indicate that in the
non-ergodic case there is a slightly slower convergence to the asymptotic distribution in
Theorem 3.2.(iii) for the efficient estimating function, and a considerably slower convergence for the inefficient estimating function, when compared to the ergodic case.
16
−4
●
●
●
●●
4
2
●
●
−2
0
2
−4
−2
0
2
4
●
●
●
4
●
●●
●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●●
●●●
4
2
2
0
0
−2
−2
●
−4
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●●
●
−4
●
●
−4
●
●
0
●
−2
−2
0
2
●
●●●
●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●
●●
●●
●
●●
●●●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●●
●●
●●
●
−2
0
2
4
−4
−2
0
2
4
bG,n (left) and Z
bH,n (right) to the N(0, 1) distribution in the
Figure 4: QQ-plots comparing Z
case of the non-ergodic model (4.3) for n = 103 (above) and n = 104 (below).
17
5
Proofs
Section 5.1 states three main lemmas needed to prove Theorem 3.2, followed by the proof
of the theorem. Section 5.2 contains the proofs of the three lemmas.
5.1
Proof of the Main Theorem
In order to prove Theorem 3.2, we use the following lemmas, together with results from
Jacod and Sørensen (2012), and Sørensen (2012, Section 1.10).
Lemma 5.1. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4 and 2.5 hold. For θ ∈ Θ, let
Gn (θ) =
n
X
n ; θ)
g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
sq
Gn (θ)
n
1 X 2
n ; θ)
=
g (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
∆n i=1
and
A(θ; θ0 ) =
B(θ; θ0 ) =
Z
1
2
0
Z
1
2
1
1
0
b2 (X s ; θ0 ) − b2 (X s ; θ) ∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds
b2 (X s ; θ0 ) − b2 (X s ; θ) ∂2y ∂θ g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds
1
Z
1
2
C(θ; θ0 ) =
−
Z
1
2
0
1
0
∂θ b2 (X s ; θ)∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds
b4 (X s ; θ0 ) +
1
2
2
2
b2 (X s ; θ0 ) − b2 (X s ; θ)
∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds .
Then,
(i) the mappings θ 7→ A(θ; θ0 ), θ 7→ B(θ; θ0 ) and θ 7→ C(θ; θ0 ) are continuous on Θ
(Pθ0 -almost surely) with A(θ0 ; θ0 ) = 0 and ∂θ A(θ; θ0 ) = B(θ; θ0 ).
(ii) for all t ∈ [0, 1],
[nt]
P
1 X
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−→ 0
√
i−1
∆n i=1
(5.1)
[nt]
2 P
1 X
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−→ 0
i−1
∆n i=1
(5.2)
[nt]
P
1 X
4
n , Xtn ; θ0 ) | Xtn
E
g
(∆
,
X
−→ 0
θ
n
t
0
i
i−1
i−1
∆2n i=1
(5.3)
and
[nt]
P
1 X
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g2 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−→
i−1
∆n i=1
t
Z
1
2
0
2
b4 (X s ; θ0 ) ∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 ) ds .
(5.4)
18
(iii) for all compact, convex subsets K ⊆ Θ,
P
sup |Gn (θ) − A(θ; θ0 )| −→ 0
θ∈K
P
sup |∂θ Gn (θ) − B(θ; θ0 )| −→ 0
θ∈K
P
sq
sup Gn (θ) − C(θ; θ0 ) −→ 0 .
θ∈K
Lemma 5.2. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4 and 2.5 hold. Then, for all t ∈ [0, 1],
[nt]
P
1 X
n ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−→ 0 .
√
i
i−1
i−1
∆n i=1
(5.5)
Lemma 5.3. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4 and 2.5 hold, and let
Yn,t
[nt]
1 X
n ; θ0 ) .
= √
g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
∆n i=1
Then the sequence of processes (Yn )n∈N given by Yn = (Yn,t )t∈[0,1] converges stably in
distribution under Pθ0 to the process Y = (Yt )t∈[0,1] given by
Z t
b2 (X s ; θ0 )∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 ) dBs .
Yt = √1
2
0
Here B = (Bs ) s≥0 denotes a standard Wiener process, which is defined on a filtered extension (Ω0 , F 0 , (Ft0 )t≥0 , P0θ0 ) of (Ω, F , (Ft )t≥0 , Pθ0 ), and is independent of (U, W).
D st
We denote stable convergence in distribution under Pθ0 as n → ∞ by −→.
Proof of Theorem 3.2. Let a compact, convex subset K ⊆ Θ with θ0 ∈ int K be given. The
functions Gn (θ), A(θ, θ0 ), B(θ, θ0 ), and C(θ, θ0 ) were defined in Lemma 5.1.
By Lemma 5.1.(i) and (iii),
P
Gn (θ0 ) −→ 0
and
P
sup |∂θ Gn (θ) − B(θ, θ0 )| −→ 0
θ∈K
(5.6)
with B(θ0 ; θ0 ) , 0 by Assumption 3.1.(ii), so Gn (θ) satisfies the conditions of Theorem 1.58
in Sørensen (2012).
Now, we show (1.161) of Theorem 1.59 in Sørensen (2012). Let ε > 0 be given, and
let B̄ε (θ0 ) and Bε (θ0 ), respectively, denote closed and open balls in R with radius ε > 0,
centered at θ0 . The compact set K\Bε (θ0 ) does not contain θ0 , and so, by Assumption
3.1.(i), A(θ, θ0 ) , 0 for all θ ∈ K\Bε (θ0 ) with probability one under Pθ0 .
19
Because
inf
θ∈K\ B̄ε (θ0 )
|A(θ, θ0 )| ≥
inf
θ∈K\Bε (θ0 )
|A(θ, θ0 )| > 0
Pθ0 -almost surely, by the continuity of θ 7→ A(θ, θ0 ), it follows that
!
Pθ0
inf |A(θ, θ0 )| > 0 = 1 .
θ∈K\ B̄ε (θ0 )
Consequently, by Theorem 1.59 in Sørensen (2012), for any Gn -estimator θ̃n ,
Pθ0 θ̃n ∈ K\ B̄ε (θ0 ) → 0 as n → ∞ .
(5.7)
for any ε > 0.
By Theorem 1.58 in Sørensen (2012), there exists a consistent Gn -estimator θ̂n , which is
eventually unique, in the sense that if θ̄n is another consistent Gn -estimator, then
Pθ0 θ̂n , θ̄n → 0 as n → ∞ .
(5.8)
Suppose that θ̃n is any Gn -estimator which satisfies that
Pθ0 θ̃n ∈ K → 1 as n → ∞ .
Combining (5.7) and (5.9), it follows that
Pθ0 θ̃n ∈ B̄ε (θ0 ) → 1
as
n → ∞,
(5.9)
(5.10)
so θ̃n is consistent. Using (5.8), Theorem 3.2.(i) follows.
To prove Theorem 3.2.(ii), recall that ∆n = 1/n, and observe that by Lemma 5.3,
√
D st
nGn (θ0 ) −→ S (θ0 )
(5.11)
where
S (θ0 ) =
1
Z
0
√1 b2 (X s ; θ0 )∂2
y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 ) dB s ,
2
and B = (Bs ) s∈[0,1] is a standard Wiener process, independent of (U, W). As X is then also
independent of B, S (θ0 ) is equal in distribution to C(θ0 ; θ0 )1/2 Z, where Z is standard normal
distributed and independent of (Xt )t∈[0,1] . Note that by Assumption 3.1.(iii), the distribution
of C(θ0 ; θ0 )1/2 Z is non-degenerate.
Let θ̂n be a consistent Gn -estimator. By (5.6), (5.11) and properties of stable convergence
(e.g. (2.3) in Jacod (1997)),
√
nGn (θ0 ) Dst S (θ0 )
−→
.
∂θ Gn (θ0 )
B(θ0 ; θ0 )
20
Stable convergence in distribution implies weak convergence, so an application of Theorem
1.60 in Sørensen (2012) yields
√
D
n(θ̂n − θ0 ) −→ −B(θ0 , θ0 )−1 S (θ0 ) .
(5.12)
The limit is equal in distribution to W(θ0 )Z, where W(θ0 ) = −B(θ0 , θ0 )−1C(θ0 ; θ0 )1/2 and
Z is standard normal distributed and independent of W(θ0 ). This completes the proof of
Theorem 3.2.(ii).
Finally, Lemma 2.14 in Jacod and Sørensen (2012) is used to write
√
√
√
n(θ̂n − θ0 ) = −B(θ0 ; θ0 )−1 nGn (θ0 ) + n|θ̂n − θ0 |εn (θ0 ) ,
where the last term goes to zero in probability under Pθ0 . By the stable continuous mapping
theorem, (5.12) holds with stable convergence in distribution as well. Lemma 5.1.(iii) may
P
b n −→
be used to conclude that W
W(θ0 ), so Theorem 3.2.(iii) follows from the stable version
of (5.12) by application of standard results for stable convergence.
5.2
Proofs of Main Lemmas
This section contains the proofs of Lemmas 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 in Section 5.1. A number of
technical results are utilised in the proofs, these results are summarised in Appendix A,
some of them with a proof.
pol
Proof of Lemma 5.1. First, note that for any f (x; θ) ∈ C0,0 (X×Θ) and any compact, convex
subset K ⊆ Θ, there exist constants C K > 0 such that
| f (X s ; θ)| ≤ C K (1 + |X s |C K )
for all s ∈ [0, 1] and θ ∈ int K. With probability one under Pθ0 , for fixed ω, C K (1+|X s (ω)|C K )
is a continuous function and therefore Lebesgue-integrable over [0, 1]. Using this method
of constructing integrable upper bounds, Lemma 5.1.(i) follows by the usual results for
continuity and differentiability of functions given by integrals.
In the rest of this proof, Lemma A.3 and (A.7) are repeatedly used without reference.
First, inserting θ = θ0 into (A.1), it is seen that
[nt]
[nt]
X
1 X
P
3/2
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
n ; θ0 ) −→ 0
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
=
∆
R(∆n , Xti−1
√
n
i−1
∆n i=1
i=1
[nt]
[nt]
X
2
1 X
P
3
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
n ; θ0 ) −→ 0 ,
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
= ∆n
R(∆n , Xti−1
i−1
∆n i=1
i=1
proving (5.1) and (5.2). Furthermore, using (A.1) and (A.3),
n
X
P
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−→ A(θ; θ0 )
i−1
i=1
21
n
X
P
n ; θ) | Xtn
−→ 0 ,
Eθ0 g2 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
i=1
so it follows from Lemma A.1 that point-wise for θ ∈ Θ,
P
Gn (θ) − A(θ; θ0 ) −→ 0 .
(5.13)
Using (A.3) and (A.5),
[nt]
1 X
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g2 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
∆n i=1
Z t
2
2
P
−→ 12
b4 (X s ; θ0 ) + 21 b2 (X s ; θ0 ) − b2 (X s ; θ)
∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ) ds
0
and
[nt]
P
1 X
4
n , Xtn ; θ) | Xtn
E
g
(∆
,
X
−→ 0 ,
θ
n
t
0
i
i−1
i−1
∆2n i=1
completing the proof of Lemma 5.1.(ii) when θ = θ0 is inserted, and yielding
P
sq
Gn (θ) − C(θ; θ0 ) −→ 0
(5.14)
point-wise for θ ∈ Θ by Lemma A.1, when t = 1 is inserted. Also, using (A.2) and (A.4),
n
X
P
n ; θ) | Xtn
−→ B(θ; θ0 )
Eθ0 ∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
i=1
n
X
P
2
n
n ; θ)
−→ 0 .
Eθ0 ∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
| Xti−1
i=1
Thus, by Lemma A.1, also
P
∂θ Gn (θ) − B(θ; θ0 ) −→ 0 ,
(5.15)
j
point-wise for θ ∈ Θ. Finally, recall that ∂y g(0, x, x; θ) = 0 for j = 0, 1. Then, using
Lemmas A.7 and A.8, it follows that for each m ∈ N and compact, convex subset K ⊆ Θ,
there exist constants Cm,K > 0 such that for all θ, θ0 ∈ K and n ∈ N,
Eθ0 |(Gn (θ) − A(θ; θ0 )) − (Gn (θ0 ) − A(θ0 ; θ0 ))|2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
Eθ0 |(∂θ Gn (θ) − B(θ; θ0 )) − (∂θ Gn (θ0 ) − B(θ0 ; θ0 ))|2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
sq
Eθ0 |(Gn (θ)
− C(θ; θ0 )) −
sq
(Gn (θ0 )
− C(θ ; θ0 ))|
0
2m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ |
0 2m
(5.16)
.
By Lemma 5.1.(i), the functions θ 7→ Gn (θ) − A(θ; θ0 ), θ 7→ ∂θ Gn (θ) − B(θ; θ0 ) and θ 7→
sq
Gn (θ) −C(θ, θ0 ) are continuous on Θ. Thus, using Lemma A.9 together with (5.13), (5.14),
(5.15) and (5.16) completes the proof of Lemma 5.1.(iii).
22
Proof of Lemma 5.2. The overall strategy in this proof is to expand the expression on the
left-hand side of (5.5) in such a manner that all terms either converge to 0 by Lemma A.3,
or are equal to 0 by the martingale properties of stochastic integral terms obtained by use
of Itô’s formula.
By Assumption 2.5 and Lemma 2.7, the formulae
g(0, y, x; θ) = 12 (y − x)2 ∂2y g(0, x, x; θ) + (y − x)3 R(y, x; θ)
g(1) (y, x; θ) = g(1) (x, x; θ) + (y − x)R(y, x; θ)
may be obtained. Using (2.4) and (5.17),
n ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i
i−1
i−1
2 2
1
n
n
n
n
n ) | Ftn
= Eθ0 2 (Xti − Xti−1 ) ∂y g(0, Xti−1 , Xti−1 ; θ0 )(Wtin − Wti−1
i−1
3
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
+ Eθ0 (Xti − Xti−1 ) R(Xti , Xti−1 ; θ0 )(Wti − Wti−1 ) | Fti−1
n , Xtn ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
+ ∆n Eθ0 g(1) (Xti−1
i
i−1
i−1
i−1
n ) | Ftn
n
n
n
n
n
+ ∆n Eθ0 (Xti − Xti−1 )R(Xti , Xti−1 ; θ0 )(Wti − Wti−1
i−1
2
n
n
n
n
n
+ ∆ Eθ0 R(∆n , Xti , Xti−1 ; θ0 )(Wti − Wti−1 ) | Fti−1 .
(5.17)
(5.18)
Note that
n
n
n
n , Xtn ; θ0 )Eθ
∆n g(1) (Xti−1
0 Wti − Wti−1 | Fti−1 = 0 ,
i−1
and that by repeated use of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, Lemma A.4 and Corollary A.5,
C
3
n | )
n ) R(Xtn , Xtn ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
≤ ∆2nC(1 + |Xti−1
Eθ0 (Xtin − Xti−1
i
i
i−1
i−1
i−1
C
n | )
n )R(Xtn , Xtn ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
≤ ∆2nC(1 + |Xti−1
∆n Eθ0 (Xtin − Xti−1
i
i
i−1
i−1
i−1
C
n | )
n ; θ0 )(Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
≤ ∆5/2
∆2n Eθ0 R(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
n C(1 + |Xti−1
i
i−1
i−1
for suitable constants C > 0, with
[nt]
1 X m/2
P
C
n | ) −→ 0
∆n C(1 + |Xti−1
√
∆n i=1
for m = 4, 5 by Lemma A.3. Now, by (5.18), it only remains to show that
[nt]
P
1 X 2
2
n , Xtn ; θ0 )Eθ
n − Xtn ) (Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
∂y g(0, Xti−1
(X
−→ 0 .
√
t
0
i
i
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
∆n i=1
Applying Itô’s formula with the function
2
n ) (w − wtn )
f (y, w) = (y − xti−1
i−1
23
(5.19)
n , conditioned on (Xtn , Wtn ) = (xtn , wtn ), it follows that
to the process (Xt , Wt )t≥ti−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
2
n ) (Wtn − Wtn )
(Xtin − Xti−1
i
i−1
Z
Z tn
i
n
n
(X s − Xti−1 )(W s − Wti−1 )a(X s ) ds +
=2
n
ti−1
n
ti−1
Z
+2
+
Z
tin
n
ti−1
n
ti
n
ti−1
tin
n )b(X s ; θ0 ) ds + 2
(X s − Xti−1
Z
tin
n
ti−1
2
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) ds
(W s − Wti−1
n )(W s − Wtn )b(X s ; θ0 ) dW s
(X s − Xti−1
i−1
(5.20)
2
n ) dW s .
(X s − Xti−1
By the martingale property of the Itô integrals in (5.20),
2
n ) (Wtn − Wtn ) | Ftn
Eθ0 (Xtin − Xti−1
i
i−1
i−1
Z tn
i
n )(W s − Wtn )a(X s ) | Ftn
=2
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
ds
i−1
i−1
n
ti−1
+
Z
+2
tin
n
ti−1
Z
2
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) | Ftn
Eθ0 (W s − Wti−1
ds
i−1
tin
n
ti−1
n )b(X s ; θ0 ) | Xtn
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
ds .
i−1
Using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, Lemma A.4 and Corollary A.5 again,
Z
tin
n
ti−1
C
n | ),
n )(W s − Wtn )a(X s ) | Ftn
ds ≤ C∆2n (1 + |Xti−1
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
i−1
i−1
and by Lemma 2.6
n
n
n ; θ0 ) ,
n )b(X s ; θ0 ) | Xtn
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
= (s − ti−1
)R(s − ti−1
, Xti−1
i−1
so also
Z
tin
n
ti−1
C
n )b(X s ; θ0 ) | Xtn
n | ).
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
ds ≤ C∆2n (1 + |Xti−1
i−1
Now
Z tn
[nt]
i
1 X 2
n
n
n )(W s − Wtn )a(X s ) | Ftn
∂y g(0, Xti−1 , Xti−1 ; θ0 )
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
ds
√
i−1
i−1
n
∆n i=1
ti−1
Z tn
[nt]
i
1 X 2
n , Xtn ; θ0 )
n )b(X s ; θ0 ) | Xtn
∂y g(0, Xti−1
+ √
Eθ0 (X s − Xti−1
ds
i−1
i−1
n
∆n i=1
ti−1
≤
∆3/2
n C
[nt]
X
P
C
n , Xtn ; θ0 ) (1 + |Xtn | ) −→ 0
∂2y g(0, Xti−1
i−1
i−1
i=1
24
(5.21)
by Lemma A.3, so by (5.19) and (5.21), it remains to show that
Z tn
[nt]
i
1 X 2
P
2
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) | Ftn
n
n
∂y g(0, Xti−1 , Xti−1 ; θ0 )
Eθ0 (W s − Wti−1
ds −→ 0 .
√
i−1
n
∆n i=1
ti−1
Applying Itô’s formula with the function
2
n )b (y; θ0 ) ,
f (y, w) = (w − wti−1
and making use of the martingale properties of the stochastic integral terms, yields
Z tn
i
2
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) | Ftn
Eθ0 (W s − Wti−1
ds
i−1
n
ti−1
=
tin
Z
n
ti−1
+
+
s
Z
n
ti−1
Z
1
2
Z
n ) | Ftn
Eθ0 a(Xu )∂y b2 (Xu ; θ0 )(Wu − Wti−1
du ds
i−1
tin
n
ti−1
tin
n
ti−1
s
Z
n
ti−1
Z
s
n
ti−1
n ) | Ftn
Eθ0 b2 (Xu ; θ0 )∂2y b2 (Xu ; θ0 )(Wu − Wti−1
du ds
i−1
n
Eθ0 b(Xu ; θ0 )∂y b2 (Xu ; θ0 ) | Fti−1
du ds .
Again, by repeated use of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Corollary A.5,
Z tn
i
5/2
2
C
2
n | )(∆ + ∆
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) | Ftn
ds ≤ C(1 + |Xti−1
Eθ0 (Wtin − Wti−1
n ).
n
i−1
n
ti−1
Now
Z tn
[nt]
i
1 X 2
2
n )b (X s ; θ0 ) | Ftn
n , Xtn ; θ0 )
Eθ0 (W s − Wti−1
ds
∂y g(0, Xti−1
√
i−1
i−1
n
∆n i=1
ti−1
[nt]
3/2
X
P
C
2
n , Xtn ; θ0 ) C(1 + |Xtn | ) −→ 0 ,
≤ ∆n + ∆ n
∂2y g(0, Xti−1
i−1
i−1
i=1
thus completing the proof.
Proof of Lemma 5.3. The aim of this proof is to establish that the conditions of Theorem
IX.7.28 in Jacod and Shiryaev (2003) hold, by which the desired result follows directly.
For all t ∈ [0, 1],
[ns]
[nt]
1 X
1 X
n ; θ 0 ) | Xt n
n , Xtn ; θ0 ) | Xtn
sup √
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
g(∆
,
X
≤
E
√
θ
n
t
0
i
i−1
i−1
i−1
s≤t
∆n i=1
∆n i=1
and since the right-hand side converges to 0 in probability under Pθ0 by (5.1) of Lemma
5.1, so does the left-hand side, i.e. condition 7.27 of Theorem IX.7.28 holds. From (5.2)
and (5.4) of Lemma 5.1, it follows that for all t ∈ [0, 1],
[nt]
2
1 X 2
n ; θ0 ) | Xtn
n
n
n
Eθ0 g (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
−
E
g(∆
,
X
,
X
;
θ
)
|
X
θ0
n
ti
ti−1 0
ti−1
i−1
∆n i=1
25
P
Z
−→
1
2
0
t
2
b4 (X s ; θ0 ) ∂2y g(0, X s , X s ; θ0 ) ds ,
establishing that condition 7.28 of Theorem IX.7.28 is satisfied. Lemma 5.2 implies condition 7.29, while the Lyapunov condition (5.3) of Lemma 5.1 implies the Lindeberg condition 7.30 of Theorem IX.7.28 in Jacod and Shiryaev (2003), from which the desired result
now follows.
Theorem IX.7.28 contains an additional condition 7.31. This condition has the same form
n
n , where N = (Nt )t≥0 is any bounded
as (5.5), but with Wtin − Wti−1
replaced by Ntin − Nti−1
martingale on (Ω, F , (Ft )t≥0 , Pθ0 ), which is orthogonal to W. However, since (Ft )t≥0 is
generated by U and W, it follows from the martingale representation theorem (Jacod and
Shiryaev, 2003, Theorem III.4.33) that every martingale on (Ω, F , (Ft )t≥0 , Pθ0 ) may be written as the sum of a constant term and a stochastic integral with respect to W, and therefore
cannot be orthogonal to W.
A
Auxiliary Results
This section contains a number of technical results used in the proofs in Section 5.2.
Lemma A.1. (Genon-Catalot and Jacod, 1993, Lemma 9) For i, n ∈ N, let Fn,i = Ftin (with
Fn,0 = F0 ), and let Fn,i be an Fn,i -measurable, real-valued random variable. If
n
X
P
Eθ0 (Fn,i | Fn,i−1 ) −→ F
n
X
and
i=1
P
2
Eθ0 (Fn,i
| Fn,i−1 ) −→ 0 ,
i=1
for some random variable F, then
n
X
P
Fn,i −→ F .
i=1
Lemma A.2. Suppose that Assumptions 2.4 and 2.5 hold. Then, for all θ ∈ Θ,
(i)
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
2
2
2
n ; θ0 ) − b (Xtn ; θ) ∂ g(0, Xtn , Xtn ; θ) + ∆ R(∆n , Xtn ; θ) ,
= 21 ∆n b2 (Xti−1
y
n
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
(A.1)
(ii)
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 ∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
2
2
2
1
n
n ; θ) ∂ ∂θ g(0, Xtn , Xtn ; θ)
= 2 ∆n b (Xti−1 ; θ0 ) − b (Xti−1
y
i−1
i−1
2
2
n ; θ)∂ g(0, Xtn , Xtn ; θ) + ∆ R(∆n , Xtn ; θ) ,
− 21 ∆n ∂θ b2 (Xti−1
y
n
i−1
i−1
i−1
26
(A.2)
(iii)
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g2 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
2
2
2
2
2
1
n ; θ0 ) − b (Xtn ; θ)
n ; θ0 ) +
n , Xtn ; θ)
(A.3)
b
(X
∂
= 21 ∆2n b4 (Xti−1
g(0,
X
t
t
y
2
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
n ; θ) ,
+ ∆3n R(∆n , Xti−1
(iv)
2
n ; θ) ,
n
n ; θ)
= ∆2n R(∆n , Xti−1
| Xti−1
Eθ0 ∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
(A.4)
n ; θ) .
n ; θ) | Xtn
= ∆4n R(∆n , Xti−1
Eθ0 g4 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(A.5)
(v)
Proof of Lemma A.2. The formulae (A.1), (A.2) and (A.3) are implicitly given in the
proofs of Sørensen (2010, Lemmas 3.2 & 3.4). To prove the two remaining formulae,
note first that using (2.5), Assumption 2.5.(i) and Lemma 2.7,
Liθ0 (g4 (0; θ))(x, x) = 0 ,
Liθ0 (g3 (0, θ)g(1) (θ))(x, x) = 0 ,
i = 1, 2, 3
i = 1, 2
Lθ0 (g (0, θ)g (θ) )(x, x) = 0
2
(1)
2
Lθ0 (g3 (0, θ)g(2) (θ))(x, x) = 0
Lθ0 (∂θ g(0, θ)2 )(x, x) = 0 .
The verification of these formulae may be simplified by using e.g. the Leibniz formula for
the n’th derivative of a product to see that partial derivatives are zero when evaluated in
y = x. These results, as well as Lemmas 2.6 and 2.7, and (A.8) are used without reference
in the following.
2
n ; θ)
n
| Xti−1
Eθ0 ∂θ g(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
2
n ; θ) | Xtn
= Eθ0 ∂θ g(0, Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(1)
n ; θ)∂θ g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 2∆n Eθ0 ∂θ g(0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
2
n
n
n
+ ∆n Eθ0 R(∆n , Xti , Xti−1 ; θ) | Xti−1
2
2
2
n , Xtn ; θ) + ∆n Lθ (∂θ g(0, θ) )(Xtn , Xtn ) + ∆ R(∆n , Xtn ; θ)
= ∂θ g(0, Xti−1
n
0
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
(1)
n
n
n
n
n
+ 2∆n ∂θ g(0, Xti−1 , Xti−1 ; θ)∂θ g (Xti−1 , Xti−1 ; θ) + ∆n R(∆n , Xti−1 ; θ)
n ; θ) ,
= ∆2n R(∆n , Xti−1
proving (A.4). Similarly,
n ; θ) | Xtn
Eθ0 g4 (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
27
n ; θ) | Xtn
= Eθ0 g4 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(1)
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 4∆n Eθ0 g3 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(1)
2
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 6∆2n Eθ0 g2 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(2)
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 2∆2n Eθ0 g3 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(1)
3
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 4∆3n Eθ0 g(0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(1)
(2)
n ; θ)g
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ 6∆3n Eθ0 g2 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
(Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
(3)
n ; θ)g
n ; θ) | Xtn
(Xtin , Xti−1
+ 23 ∆3n Eθ0 g3 (0, Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
n ; θ) | Xtn
+ ∆4n Eθ0 R(∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i−1
4
4
1 2 2
n , Xtn ; θ) + ∆n Lθ (g (0; θ))(Xtn , Xtn ) + ∆ L (g (0; θ))(Xtn , Xtn )
= g4 (0, Xti−1
0
2 n θ0
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
(1)
3
n , Xtn ; θ)
n , Xtn ) + 4∆n g (0, Xtn , Xtn ; θ)g
(Xti−1
+ 61 ∆3n L3θ0 (g4 (0; θ))(Xti−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
3 2
3
(1)
n , Xtn ) + 2∆ L (g (0; θ)g
n , Xt n )
+ 4∆2n Lθ0 (g3 (0; θ)g(1) (θ))(Xti−1
(θ))(Xti−1
n θ0
i−1
i−1
2
3
2
(1)
(1)
n , Xt n )
n , Xtn ; θ) + 6∆ Lθ (g (0; θ)g
n , Xtn ; θ)g
(θ)2 )(Xti−1
(Xti−1
+ 6∆2n g2 (0, Xti−1
n
0
i−1
i−1
i−1
(2)
3
3
(2)
n , Xtn ; θ)g
n , Xtn ; θ) + 2∆ Lθ (g (0; θ)g
n , Xtn )
+ 2∆2n g3 (0, Xti−1
(Xti−1
(θ))(Xti−1
n
0
i−1
i−1
i−1
3
(1)
n , Xtn ; θ)
n , Xtn ; θ)g
(Xti−1
+ 4∆3n g(0, Xti−1
i−1
i−1
(2)
(1)
n , Xtn ; θ)
n , Xtn ; θ)g
n , Xtn ; θ)g
(Xti−1
(Xti−1
+ 6∆3n g2 (0, Xti−1
i−1
i−1
i−1
(3)
n , Xtn ; θ)
n , Xtn ; θ)g
+ 23 ∆3n g3 (0, Xti−1
(Xti−1
i−1
i−1
n ; θ)
+ ∆4n R(∆n , Xti−1
n ; θ) ,
= ∆4n R(∆n , Xti−1
which proves (A.5).
Lemma A.3. Let x 7→ f (x) be a continuous, real-valued function, and let t ∈ [0, 1] be
given. Then
Z t
[nt]
X
P
n ) −→
∆n
f (Xti−1
f (X s ) ds .
0
i=1
Lemma A.3 follows easily by the convergence of Riemann sums.
Lemma A.4. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 holds, and let m ≥ 2. Then, there exists a
constant Cm > 0, such that for 0 ≤ t ≤ t + ∆ ≤ 1,
Eθ0 |Xt+∆ − Xt |m | Xt ≤ Cm ∆m/2 1 + |Xt |m .
(A.6)
Corollary A.5. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 holds. Let a compact, convex set K ⊆ Θ be
given, and suppose that f (y, x; θ) is of polynomial growth in x and y, uniformly for θ in K.
Then, there exist constants C K > 0 such that for 0 ≤ t ≤ t + ∆ ≤ 1,
Eθ0 (| f (Xt+∆ , Xt , θ)| | Xt ) ≤ C K 1 + |Xt |C K
28
for all θ ∈ K.
Lemma A.4 and Corollary A.5, correspond to Lemma 6 of Kessler (1997), adapted to the
present assumptions. For use in the following, observe that for any θ ∈ Θ, there exist
constants Cθ > 0 such that
∆n
[nt]
X
n ) ≤ C θ ∆n
Rθ (∆n , Xti−1
[nt]
X
C
n | θ ,
1 + |Xti−1
i=1
i=1
so it follows from Lemma A.3 that for any deterministic, real-valued sequence (δn )n∈N with
δn → 0 as n → ∞,
δn ∆n
[nt]
X
P
n ) −→ 0 .
Rθ (∆n , Xti−1
(A.7)
i=1
Note that by Corollary A.5, it holds that under Assumption 2.4,
Eθ0 (R (∆, Xt+∆ , Xt ; θ) | Xt ) = R(∆, Xt ; θ) .
(A.8)
Lemma A.6. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 holds, and that the function f (t, y, x; θ) satisfies
that
pol
f (t, y, x; θ) ∈ C1,2,1 ([0, 1] × X2 × Θ)
with
f (0, x, x; θ) = 0
(A.9)
for all x ∈ X and θ ∈ Θ. Let m ∈ N be given, and let Dk( · ; θ, θ0 ) = k( · ; θ) − k( · ; θ0 ). Then,
there exist constants Cm > 0 such that
2m
Eθ0 D f (t − s, Xt , X s ; θ, θ0 )
Z t
2m
2m−1
≤ Cm (t − s)
Eθ0 D f1 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ0 )
du
(A.10)
s
Z t
2m
+ Cm (t − s)m−1
Eθ0 D f2 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ0 )
du
s
for 0 ≤ s < t ≤ 1 and θ, θ0 ∈ Θ, where f1 and f2 are given by
f1 (t, y, x; θ) = ∂t f (t, y, x; θ) + a(y)∂y f (t, y, x; θ) + 12 b2 (y; θ0 )∂2y f (t, y, x; θ)
f2 (t, y, x; θ) = b(y; θ0 )∂y f (t, y, x; θ) .
Furthermore, for each compact, convex set K ⊆ Θ, there exists a constant Cm,K > 0 such
that
Eθ0 |D f j (t − s, Xt , X s ; θ, θ0 )|2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
for j = 1, 2, 0 ≤ s < t ≤ 1 and all θ, θ0 ∈ K.
29
Proof of Lemma A.6. A simple application of Itô’s formula (when conditioning on X s =
x s ) yields that for all θ ∈ Θ,
Z t
Z t
f (t − s, Xt , X s ; θ) =
f1 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ) du +
f2 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ) dWu
(A.11)
s
s
under Pθ0 .
By Jensen’s inequality, it holds that for any k ∈ N,
Z
Z t
k
t
0 jk
k−1
0
j
du
Eθ0 D f j (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ )
D f j (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ ) du ≤ (t − s)
Eθ0
s
s
(A.12)
for j = 1, 2, and by the martingale properties of the second term in (A.11), the BurkholderDavis-Gundy inequality may be used to show that
Z
Z t
2m
m!
t
0
Eθ0
.
D f2 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ ) dWu ≤ Cm Eθ0
D f2 (u − s, Xu , X s ; θ, θ0 )2 du
s
s
(A.13)
Now, (A.11), (A.12) and (A.13) may be combined to show (A.10). The last result of the
lemma follows by an application of the mean value theorem.
Lemma A.7. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 holds, and let K ⊆ Θ be compact and convex.
Assume that f (t, y, x; θ) satisfies (A.9) for all x ∈ X and θ ∈ Θ, and define
Fn (θ) =
n
X
n ; θ) .
f (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
Then, for each m ∈ N, there exists a constant Cm,K > 0, such that
Eθ0 Fn (θ) − Fn (θ0 )
2m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
en (θ) = ∆−1
for all θ, θ0 ∈ K and n ∈ N. Define F
n F n (θ), and suppose, moreover, that the
functions
h1 (t, y, x; θ) = ∂t f (t, y, x; θ) + a(y)∂y f (t, y, x; θ) + 21 b2 (y; θ0 )∂2y f (t, y, x; θ)
h2 (t, y, x; θ) = b(y; θ0 )∂y f (t, y, x; θ)
h j2 (t, y, x; θ) = b(y; θ0 )∂y h j (t, y, x, θ)
satisfy (A.9) for j = 1, 2. Then, for each m ∈ N, there exists a constant Cm,K > 0, such that
en (θ) − F
en (θ0 ) 2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
E θ0 F
for all θ, θ0 ∈ K and n ∈ N.
30
Proof of Lemma A.7. For use in the following, define, in addition to h1 , h2 and h j2 , the
functions
h j1 (t, y, x; θ) = ∂t h j (t, y, x; θ) + a(y)∂y h j (t, y, x; θ) + 21 b2 (y; θ0 )∂2y h j (t, y, x; θ)
h j21 (t, y, x; θ) = ∂t h j2 (t, y, x; θ) + a(y)∂y h j2 (t, y, x; θ) + 12 b2 (y; θ0 )∂2y h j2 (t, y, x; θ)
h j22 (t, y, x; θ) = b(y; θ0 )∂y h j2 (t, y, x; θ)
for j = 1, 2, and, for ease of notation, let
0
n
0
n
H n,i
j (u; θ, θ ) = Dh j (u − ti−1 , Xu , Xti−1 ; θ, θ )
for j ∈ {1, 2, 11, 12, 21, 22, 121, 122, 221, 222}, where Dk( · ; θ, θ0 ) = k( · ; θ) − k( · ; θ0 ). Recall that ∆n = 1/n.
First, by the martingale properties of
∆n
n Z
X
i=1
r
0
n,i
0
n ,tn ] (u)H
1(ti−1
2 (u; θ, θ ) dWu ,
i
the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality is used to establish the existence of a constant
Cm > 0 such that
2m
m
n Z tn
n Z tn
X
2 X
i
i
n,i
n,i
0
0
2
Eθ0 ∆n
H2 (u; θ, θ ) dWu ≤ Cm Eθ0 ∆n
H2 (u; θ, θ ) du .
tn
tn
i=1
i=1
i−1
i−1
Now, using also Ito’s formula, Jensen’s inequality and Lemma A.6,
2m
n
X
0
n ; θ, θ )
Eθ0 ∆n
D f (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
2m
2m
n Z tn
n Z tn
X
X
i
i
≤ Cm Eθ0 ∆n
H1n,i (u; θ, θ0 ) du + Cm Eθ0 ∆n
H2n,i (u; θ, θ0 ) dWu
n
n
i=1 ti−1
i=1 ti−1
Z n
2m
m
n
n Z tn
ti
X
2 X
i
n,i
n,i
0
0
2
≤ Cm ∆n
Eθ0
H1 (u; θ, θ ) du + Cm Eθ0 ∆n
H2 (u; θ, θ ) du
n
n
i=1
ti−1
i=1
ti−1
2m
m
Z tn
n
1 Z tin
X
i
1
n,i
n,i
0
0 2
Eθ0
≤ Cm ∆2m+1
n
∆n tn H1 (u; θ, θ ) du + Eθ0 ∆n tn H2 (u; θ, θ ) du
i−1
i−1
i=1
Z
Z
n
n
n
t
t
X
n,i
n,i
i
i
2m
0
2m
0
2m
(A.14)
Eθ0 |H (u; θ, θ )|
du +
Eθ0 |H (u; θ, θ )|
du
≤ Cm ∆n
≤ Cm,K |θ
n
ti−1
i=1
− θ0 |2m ∆2m
n ,
1
n
ti−1
2
thus
2m
n
X
0 2m
−2m
0
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m
n ; θ, θ )
Eθ0 |DFn (θ, θ )|
= ∆n Eθ0 ∆n
D f (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
31
for all θ, θ0 ∈ K and n ∈ N. In the case where also h j and h j2 satisfy (A.9) for all x ∈ X,
θ ∈ Θ and j = 1, 2, use Lemma A.6 to write
Eθ0 |H1n,i (u; θ, θ0 )|2m
Z u
n,i
n 2m−1
≤ Cm (u − ti−1 )
Eθ0 |H11
(v; θ, θ0 )|2m dv
n
ti−1
+ Cm (u −
u
Z
n m−1
ti−1
)
n
ti−1
Z
n 2m−1
≤ Cm (u − ti−1
)
u
n
ti−1
n,i
Eθ0 |H11
(v; θ, θ0 )|2m dv
u
Z
+ Cm (u −
n m−1
ti−1
)
+ Cm (u −
n m−1
ti−1
)
n,i
Eθ0 |H12
(v; θ, θ0 )|2m dv
n
ti−1
u
Z
n
ti−1
Z
(v − tn )2m−1
i−1
v
n
ti−1
Z
n
m−1
(v − t )
i−1
Eθ0
v
n
ti−1
Eθ0
2m
n,i
H121
(w; θ, θ0 )
2m
n,i
H122
(w; θ, θ0 )
dw dv
dw dv
n 2m
n 3m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m (u − ti−1
) + (u − ti−1
)
,
and similarly obtain
n 2m
n 3m
Eθ0 |H2n,i (u; θ, θ0 )|2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m (u − ti−1
) + (u − ti−1
)
.
Now, inserting into (A.14),
2m
n
X
0
n ; θ, θ )
Eθ0 ∆n
D f (∆n , Xtin , Xti−1
i=1
Z
n
X
n,i
Z tin
2m
0
2m
≤ Cm,K ∆n
Eθ0 |H1 (u; θ, θ )|
du +
i=1
n
ti−1
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m ∆2m
n
n Z
X
tin
n
ti−1
i=1
tin
n
ti−1
n,i
0 2m
Eθ0 |H2 (u; θ, θ )|
du
n 2m
n 3m
(u − ti−1
) + (u − ti−1
)
du
5m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m ∆4m
,
n + ∆n
and, ultimately,
Eθ0 |DF̃n (θ, θ0 )|2m
2m
n
X
0
n , Xtn ; θ, θ )
D
f
(∆
,
X
= Eθ0 ∆−1
n
t
n
i
i−1
i=1
2m
n
X
0
∆n
n , Xtn ; θ, θ )
= ∆−4m
D
f
(∆
,
X
n
t
n Eθ0
i
i−1
i=1
0 2m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ |
(1 + ∆n )
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ |
.
0 2m
pol
Lemma A.8. Suppose that Assumption 2.4 is satisfied. Let f ∈ C0,1 (X × Θ). Define
Z 1
F(θ) =
f (X s ; θ) ds
0
32
and let K ⊆ Θ be compact and convex. Then, for each m ∈ N, there exists a constant
Cm,K > 0 such that for all θ, θ0 ∈ K,
Eθ0 |F(θ) − F(θ0 )|2m ≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m .
Lemma A.8 follows from a simple application of the mean value theorem.
Lemma A.9. Let K ⊆ Θ be compact. Suppose that Hn = (Hn (θ))θ∈K defines a sequence
(Hn )n∈N of continuous, real-valued stochastic processes such that
P
Hn (θ) −→ 0
point-wise for all θ ∈ K. Furthermore, assume that for some m ∈ N, there exists a constant
Cm,K > 0 such that for all θ, θ0 ∈ K and n ∈ N,
Eθ0 Hn (θ) − Hn (θ0 )
2m
≤ Cm,K |θ − θ0 |2m .
(A.15)
Then,
P
sup |Hn (θ)| −→ 0 .
θ∈K
Proof of Lemma A.9. (Hn (θ))n∈N is tight in R for all θ ∈ K, so, using (A.15), it follows
from Kallenberg (2002, Corollary 16.9 & Theorem 16.3) that the sequence of processes
(Hn )n∈N is tight in C(K, R), the space of continuous (and bounded) real-valued functions on
K, and thus relatively compact in distribution. Also, for all d ∈ N and (θ1 , . . . , θd ) ∈ K d ,
0
Hn (θ1 )
. D .
.. −→ .. ,
Hn (θd )
0
D
so by Kallenberg (2002, Lemma 16.2), Hn −→ 0 in C(K, R) equipped with the uniform
D
metric. Finally, by the continuous mapping theorem, supθ∈K |Hn (θ)| −→ 0 , and the desired
result follows.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to the referees for their insightful comments and suggestions that have
improved the paper. Nina Munkholt Jakobsen was supported by the Danish Council for
Independent Research | Natural Science through a grant to Susanne Ditlevsen. Michael
Sørensen was supported by the Center for Research in Econometric Analysis of Time Series
funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. The research is part of the Dynamical
Systems Interdisciplinary Network funded by the University of Copenhagen Programme of
Excellence.
33
References
Aït-Sahalia, Y. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of discretely sampled diffusions:
A closed form approximation approach. Econometrica, 70(1):223–262.
Aït-Sahalia, Y. (2008). Closed form likelihood expansions for multivariate diffusions. Annals of Statistics, 36(2):906–937.
Beskos, A., Papaspiliopoulos, O., and Roberts, G. (2009). Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation for discretely observed diffusion processes. Annals of Statistics,
37(1):223–245.
Beskos, A., Papaspiliopoulos, O., Roberts, G. O., and Fearnhead, P. (2006). Exact and computationally efficient likelihood-based estimation for discretely observed diffusion processes (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 68(3):333–
382.
Bibbona, E., Lansky, P., and Sirovich, R. (2010). Estimating input parameters from intracellular recordings in the Feller neuronal model. Physical Review E, 81(3):031916.
Bibby, B. M. and Sørensen, M. (1995). Martingale estimation functions for discretely
observed diffusion processes. Bernoulli, 1(1-2):17–39.
Bladt, M., Finch, S., and Sørensen, M. (2016). Simulation of multivariate diffusion bridges.
J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 78:343–369.
Bladt, M. and Sørensen, M. (2014). Simple simulation of diffusion bridges with application
to likelihood inference for diffusions. Bernoulli, 20:645–675.
Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, Jr., J. E., and Ross, S. A. (1985). A theory of the term structure of
interest rates. Econometrica, 53(2):385–407.
Dacunha-Castelle, D. and Florens-Zmirou, D. (1986). Estimation of the coefficients of a
diffusion from discrete observations. Stochastics, 19(4):263–284.
Ditlevsen, S. and Lansky, P. (2006). Estimation of the input parameters in the Feller neuronal model. Physical Review E, 73(6):061910.
Dohnal, G. (1987). On estimating the diffusion coefficient. Journal of Applied Probability,
24(1):105–114.
Durham, G. B. and Gallant, A. R. (2002). Numerical techniques for maximum likelihood
estimation of continuous-time diffusion processes. Journal of Business & Economic
Statistics, 20(3):297–316.
Favetto, B. and Samson, A. (2010). Parameter estimation for a bidimensional partially
observed Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with biological application. Scandinavian Journal
of Statistics, 37(2):200–220.
34
Florens-Zmirou, D. (1989). Approximate discrete-time schemes for statistics of diffusion
processes. Statistics, 20(4):547–557.
Florens-Zmirou, D. (1993). On estimating the diffusion coefficient from discrete observations. Journal of Applied Probability, 30(4):790–804.
Forman, J. L. and Sørensen, M. (2008). The Pearson diffusions: A class of statistically
tractable diffusion processes. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 35(3):438–465.
Genon-Catalot, V. and Jacod, J. (1993). On the estimation of the diffusion coefficient for
multi-dimensional diffusion processes. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincaré (B) Probabilités et Statistiques, 29(1):119–151.
Genon-Catalot, V. and Jacod, J. (1994). Estimation of the diffusion coefficient for diffusion
processes: Random sampling. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 21(3):193–221.
Gloter, A. and Sørensen, M. (2009). Estimation for stochastic differential equations with
a small diffusion coefficient. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 119(3):679–
699.
Gobet, E. (2001). Local asymptotic mixed normality property for elliptic diffusion: a
Malliavin calculus approach. Bernoulli, 7(6):899–912.
Godambe, V. P. and Heyde, C. C. (1987). Quasi-likelihood and optimal estimation. International Statistical Review, 55(3):231–244.
Golightly, A. and Wilkinson, D. J. (2006). Bayesian sequential inference for nonlinear
multivariate diffusions. Statistics and Computing, 16:323–338.
Golightly, A. and Wilkinson, D. J. (2008). Bayesian inference for nonlinear multivariate diffusion models observed with error. Computational Statistics and Data Ananysis,
52:1674–1693.
Heyde, C. C. (1997). Quasi-Likelihood and Its Application. New York, Springer.
Iacus, S. M. (2014). sde: Simulation and Inference for Stochastic Differential Equations.
R package version 2.0.13. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sde.
Jacobsen, M. (2001). Discretely observed diffusions: Classes of estimating functions and
small Delta-optimality. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 28(1):123–149.
Jacobsen, M. (2002). Optimality and small Delta-optimality of martingale estimating functions. Bernoulli, 8(5):643–668.
Jacod, J. (1997). On continuous conditional Gaussian martingales and stable convergence
in law. In Seminaire de Probabilites XXXI, pages 232–246. Heidelberg, Springer.
Jacod, J. (2000). Non-parametric kernel estimation of the coefficient of a diffusion. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 27(1):83–96.
35
Jacod, J. (2006). Parametric inference for discretely observed non-ergodic diffusions.
Bernoulli, 12(3):383–401.
Jacod, J. (2010). Inference for stochastic processes. In Aït-Sahalia, Y. and Hansen, L. P.,
editors, Handbook of Financial Econometrics: Applications, volume 2 of Handbooks in
Finance, chapter 16, pages 197–239. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
Jacod, J. and Protter, P. (1998). Asymptotic error distributions for the Euler method for
stochastic differential equations. Annals of Probability, 26(1):267–307.
Jacod, J. and Shiryaev, A. (2003). Limit Theorems for Stochastic Processes, 2nd edition.
New York, Springer.
Jacod, J. and Sørensen, M. (2012). Aspects of asymptotic statistical theory for stochastic
processes. Preprint, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jeganathan, P. (1982). On the asymptotic theory of estimation when the limit of the loglikelihood ratios is mixed normal. Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A,
pages 173–212.
Kallenberg, O. (2002). Foundations of Modern Probability, 2nd Edition. New York,
Springer.
Kessler, M. (1997). Estimation of an ergodic diffusion from discrete observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 24:211–229.
Kessler, M., Lindner, A., and Sørensen, M. (2012). Statistical Methods for Stochastic
Differential Equations. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall.
Kessler, M. and Sørensen, M. (1999). Estimating equations based on eigenfunctions for a
discretely observed diffusion process. Bernoulli, 5:299–314.
Larsen, K. S. and Sørensen, M. (2007). A diffusion model for exchange rates in a target
zone. Mathematical Finance, 17:285–306.
Le Cam, L. and Yang, G. L. (2000). Asymptotics in Statistics: Some Basic Concepts, 2nd
edition. New York, Springer.
Li, C. (2013). Maximum-likelihood estimation for diffusion processes via closed-form
density expansions. Annals of Statistics, 41(3):1350–1380.
Merton, R. C. (1971). Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time
model. Journal of Economic Theory, 3(4):373–413.
Mykland, P. A. and Zhang, L. (2006). ANOVA for diffusions and Ito processes. Annals of
Statistics, 34(4):1931–1963.
Pedersen, A. R. (1995). A new approach to maximum likelihood estimation for stochastic
differential equations based on discrete observations. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics,
22(1):55–71.
36
Pedersen, A. R. (2000). Estimating the nitrous oxide emission rate from the soil surface by
means of a diffusion model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 27(3):385–403.
Picchini, U., Ditlevsen, S., and De Gaetano, A. (2008). Maximum likelihood estimation of
a time-inhomogeneous stochastic differential model of glucose dynamics. Mathematical
Medicine and Biology, 25(2):141–155.
Prakasa Rao, B. L. S. (1983). Asymptotic theory for non-linear least squares estimator for
diffusion processes. Statistics, 14(2):195–209.
R Core Team (2014). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Roberts, G. O. and Stramer, O. (2001). On inference for partially observed nonlinear
diffusion models using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Biometrika, 88(3):603–621.
Sørensen, H. (2004). Parametric inference for diffusion processes observed at discrete
points in time: A survey. International Statistical Review, 72:337 – 354.
Sørensen, M. (2010). Efficient estimation for ergodic diffusions sampled at high frequency.
Preprint, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sørensen, M. (2012). Estimating functions for diffusion-type processes. In Kessler, M.,
Lindner, A., and Sørensen, M., editors, Statistical Methods for Stochastic Differential
Equations, pages 1–107. Boca Raton, Chapman & Hall.
Uchida, M. (2004). Estimation for discretely observed small diffusions based on approximate martingale estimating functions. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 31(4):553–
566.
Uchida, M. and Yoshida, N. (2013). Quasi likelihood analysis of volatility and nondegeneracy of statistical random fields. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 123:2851–
2876.
Vasicek, O. (1977). An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. Journal of
Financial Economics, 5(2):177–188.
Yoshida, N. (1992). Estimation for diffusion processes from discrete observation. Journal
of Multivariate Analysis, 41(2):220–242.
37
| 10math.ST
|
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
Tomas Petricek
Computer Laboratory
University of Cambridge
United Kingdom
[email protected]
Monads have become a powerful tool for structuring effectful computations in functional programming, because they make the order of effects explicit. When translating pure code to a monadic
version, we need to specify evaluation order explicitly. Two standard translations give call-by-value
and call-by-name semantics. The resulting programs have different structure and types, which makes
revisiting the choice difficult.
In this paper, we translate pure code to monadic using an additional operation malias that abstracts out the evaluation strategy. The malias operation is based on computational comonads; we
use a categorical framework to specify the laws that are required to hold about the operation.
For any monad, we show implementations of malias that give call-by-value and call-by-name
semantics. Although we do not give call-by-need semantics for all monads, we show how to turn
certain monads into an extended monad with call-by-need semantics, which partly answers an open
question. Moreover, using our unified translation, it is possible to change the evaluation strategy of
functional code translated to the monadic form without changing its structure or types.
1
Introduction
Purely functional languages use lazy evaluation (also called call-by-need) to allow elegant programming
with infinite data structures and to guarantee that a program will not evaluate a diverging term unless it
is needed to obtain the final result. However, reasoning about lazy evaluation is difficult thus it is not
suitable for programming with effects.
An elegant way to embed effectful computations in lazy functional languages, introduced by Moggi
[16] and Wadler [26], is to use monads. Monads embed effects in a purely functional setting and explicitly specify the evaluation order of monadic (effectful) operations.
Wadler [26] gives two ways of translating pure programs to a corresponding monadic version. One
approach leads to a call-by-value semantics, where effects of function arguments are performed before
calling a function. However, if an argument has an effect and terminates the program, this may not be
appropriate if the function can successfully complete without using the argument. The second approach
gives a call-by-name semantics, where effects are performed only if the argument is actually used. However, this approach is also not always suitable, because an effect may be performed repeatedly. Wadler
leaves an open question whether there is a translation that would correspond to call-by-need semantics,
where effects are performed only when the result is needed, but at most once.
The main contribution of this paper is an alternative translation of functional code to a monadic form,
parameterized by an operation malias. The translation has the following properties:
• A single translation gives monadic code with either call-by-name or call-by-value semantics, depending on the definition of malias (Section 2). When used in languages such as Haskell, it is
possible to write code that is parameterized by the evaluation strategy (Section 4.1).
J. Chapman and P. B. Levy (Eds.): Fourth Workshop on
Mathematically Structured Functional Programming (MSFP 2012).
EPTCS 76, 2012, pp. 68–89, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.76.7
Tomas Petricek
69
• The translation can be used to construct monads that provide the call-by-need semantics (Section 4.2), which partly answers the open question posed by Wadler. Furthermore, for some monads, it is possible to use parallel call-by-need semantics, where arguments are evaluated in parallel
with the body of a function (Section 4.3).
• The malias operation has solid foundations in category theory. It arises from augmenting a monad
structure with a computational semi-comonad based on the same functor (Section 3). We use this
theory to define laws that should be obeyed by malias implementations (Section 2.2).
This paper was inspired by work on joinads [19], which introduced the malias operation for a similar
purpose. However, operations with the same type and similar laws appear several times in the literature.
We return to joinads in Section 4.4 and review other related work in Section 5.
1.1 Translating to monadic code
We first demonstrate the two standard options for translating purely functional code to monadic form.
Consider the following two functions that use pureLookupInput to read some configuration property.
Assuming the configuration is already loaded in memory, we can write the following pure computation1 :
chooseSize :: Int → Int → Int
chooseSize new legacy =
if new > 0 then new else legacy
resultSize :: Int
resultSize =
chooseSize (pureLookupInput "new_size")
(pureLookupInput "legacy_size")
The resultSize function reads two different configuration keys and chooses one of them using chooseSize.
When using a language with lazy evaluation, the call pureLookupInput "legacy_size" is performed
only when the value of "new_size" is less than or equal to zero.
To modify the function to actually read configuration from a file as opposed to performing in-memory
lookup, we now use lookupInput which returns IO Int instead of the pureLookupInput function. Then we
need to modify the two above functions. There are two mechanical ways that give different semantics.
Call-by-value. In the first style, we call lookupInput and then apply monadic bind on the resulting
computation. This reads both of the configuration values before calling the chooseSize function, and so
arguments are fully evaluated before the body of a function as in the call-by-value evaluation strategy:
chooseSizecbv :: Int → Int → IO Int
chooseSizecbv new legacy =
return (if new > 0 then new else legacy)
resultSizecbv :: IO Int
resultSizecbv = do
new ← lookupInput cbv "new_size"
legacy ← lookupInput cbv "legacy_size"
chooseSize cbv new legacy
1 Examples
are written in Haskell and can be found at: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~tp322/papers/malias.html
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
70
In this version of the translation, a function of type A → B is turned into a function A → M B. For
example, the chooseSizecbv function takes integers as parameters and returns a computation that returns
an integer and may perform some effects. When calling a function in this setting, the arguments may not
be fully evaluated (the functional part is still lazy), but the effects associated with obtaining the value of
the argument happen before the function call.
For example, if the call lookupInput cbv "new_size" read a file and then returned 1024, but the
operation lookupInput cbv "legacy_size" caused the program to crash because a specified key was not
present in a configuration file, then the entire program would crash.
Call-by-name. In the second style, we pass unevaluated computations as arguments to functions. This
means we call lookupInput to create an effectful computation that will read the input, but the computation
is then passed to chooseSize, which may not need to evaluate it:
chooseSizecbn :: IO Int → IO Int → IO Int
chooseSizecbn new legacy = do
newVal ← new
if newVal > 0 then new else legacy
resultSizecbn :: IO Int
resultSizecbn =
chooseSize cbn (lookupInput cbn "new_size")
(lookupInput cbn "legacy_size")
The translation turns a function of type A → B into a function M A → M B. This means that the
chooseSize cbn function takes a computation that performs the I/O effect and reads information from the
configuration file, as opposed to taking a value whose effects were already performed.
Following the mechanical translation, chooseSizecbn returns a monadic computation that evaluates the
first argument and then behaves either as new or as legacy, depending on the obtained value. When the
resulting computation is executed, the computation which reads the value of the "new_size" key may
be executed repeatedly. First, inside the chooseSizecbn function and then repeatedly when the result of
this function is evaluated. In this particular example, we can easily change the code to perform the effect
just once, but this is not generally possible for computations obtained by the call-by-name translation.
2
Abstracting evaluation strategy
The translations demonstrated in the previous section have two major problems. Firstly, it is not easy to
switch between the two – when we introduce effects using monads, we need to decide to use one or the
other style and changing between them later on involves rewriting of the program and changing types.
Secondly, even in the IO monad, we cannot easily implement a call-by-need strategy that would perform
effects only when a value is needed, but at most once.
2.1 Translation using aliasing
To solve these problems, we propose an alternative translation. We require a monad m with an additional
operation malias that abstracts out the evaluation strategy and has a type m a → m (m a). The term
aliasing refers to the fact that some part of effects may be performed once and their results shared in
multiple monadic computations. The translation of the previous example using malias looks as follows:
Tomas Petricek
71
chooseSize :: IO Int → IO Int → IO Int
chooseSize new legacy = do
newVal ← new
if newVal > 0 then new else legacy
resultSize :: IO Int
resultSize = do
new ← malias (lookupInput "new_size")
legacy ← malias (lookupInput "legacy_size")
chooseSize new legacy
The types of functions and access to function parameters are translated in the same way as in the call-byname translation. The chooseSize function returns a computation IO Int and its parameters also become
computations of type IO Int. When using the value of a parameter, the computation is evaluated using
monadic bind (e.g. the line newVal ← new in chooseSize).
The computations passed as arguments are not the original computations as in the call-by-name
translation. The translation inserts a call to malias for every function argument (and also for every letbound value, which can be encoded using lambda abstraction and application). The computation returned
by malias has a type m (m a), which makes it possible to perform the effects at two different call sites:
• When simulating the call-by-value strategy, all effects are performed when binding the outer
monadic computation before a function call.
• When simulating the call-by-name strategy, all effects are performed when binding the inner
monadic computation, when the value is actually needed.
These two strategies can be implemented by two simple definitions of malias. However, by delegating the implementation of malias to the monad, we make it possible to implement more advanced
strategies as well. We discuss some of them later in Section 4. We keep the translation informal until
Section 2.3 and discuss the malias operation in more detail first.
Implementing call-by-name. To implement the call-by-name strategy, the malias operation needs to
return the computation specified as an argument inside the monad. In the type m (m a), the outer m will
not carry any effects and the inner m will be the same as the original computation:
malias :: m a → m (m a)
malias m = return m
From the monad laws (see Figure 1), we know that applying monadic bind to a computation created from
a value using return is equivalent to just passing the value to the rest of the computation. This means that
the additional binding in the translation does not have any effect and the resulting program behaves as
the call-by-name strategy. A complete proof can be found in Appendix A.
Implementing call-by-value. Implementing the call-by-value strategy is similarly simple. In the returned computation of type m (m a), the computation corresponding to the outer m needs to perform all
the effects. The computation corresponding to the inner m will be a computation that simply returns the
previously computed value without performing any effects:
malias :: m a → m (m a)
malias m = m >>= (return ◦ return)
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
72
Functor with unit and join:
unit :: a → m a
map :: m a → (a → b) → m b
join :: m (m a) → m a
Definition using bind (>>=) and return:
return :: a → m a
>>= :: m a → (a → m b) → m b
Join laws (unit and map laws omitted):
Monad laws about bind and return:
return a >>= f ≡ f a
m >>= return ≡ m
(m >>= f ) >>= g ≡ m >>= (λ x → f x >>= g)
join ◦ map join = join ◦ join
join ◦ map unit = id = join ◦ unit
join ◦ map (map f ) = map f ◦ join
Figure 1: Two equivalent ways of defining monads with monad laws
In Haskell, the second line could be written as liftM return m. The liftM operation represents the functor
associated with the monad. This means that binding on the returned computation performs all the effects,
obtains a value v and returns a computation return v.
When calling a function that takes an argument of type m a, the argument passed to it using this implementation of malias will always be constructed using the return operation. Hence the resulting behaviour
is equivalent to the original call-by-value translation. Detailed proof can be found in Appendix A.
2.2 The malias operation laws
In order to define a reasonable evaluation strategy, we require the malias operation to obey a number of
laws. The laws follow from the theoretical background that is discussed in Section 3, namely from the
fact that malias is the cojoin operation of a computational semi-comonad.
The laws that relate malias to the monad are easier to write in terms of join, map and unit than using
the formulation based on >>= and return. For completeness, the two equivalent definitions of monads
with the monad laws are shown in Figure 1. Although we do not show it, one can be easily defined in
terms of the other. The required laws for malias are the following:
map (map f ) ◦ malias
map malias ◦ malias
malias ◦ unit
join ◦ malias
=
=
=
=
malias ◦ (map f )
malias ◦ malias
unit ◦ unit
id
(naturality)
(associativity)
(computationality)
(identity)
The first two laws follow from the fact that malias is a cojoin operation of a comonad. The naturality law
specifies that applying a function to a value inside a computation is the same as applying the function to a
value inside an aliased computation. The associativity law specifies that aliasing an aliased computation
is the same as aliasing a computation produced by an aliased computation.
The computationality law is derived from the fact that the comonad defining malias is a computational comonad with unit as one of the components. The law specifies that aliasing of a pure computation
creates a pure computation. Finally, the identity law relates malias with the monadic structure, by requiring that join is a left inverse of malias. Intuitively, it specifies that aliasing a computation of type m a and
then joining the result returns the original computation.
All four laws hold for the two implementations of malias presented in the previous section. We prove
that the laws hold for any monad using the standard monad laws. The proofs can be found in Appendix B.
We discuss the intuition behind the laws in Section 2.4 and describe their categorical foundations in
Section 3. The next section formally presents the translation algorithm.
Tomas Petricek
73
JxKcbn
Jλ x.eKcbn
Je1 e2 Kcbn
Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcbn
=
=
=
=
x
unit (λ x.JeKcbn )
bind Je1 Kcbn (λ f . f Je2 Kcbn )
(λ x.Je2 Kcbn ) Je1 Kcbn
Figure 2: Wadler’s call-by-name translation of λ calculus.
JxKcbv
Jλ x.eKcbv
Je1 e2 Kcbv
Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcbv
=
=
=
=
unit x
unit (λ x.JeKcbv )
bind Je1 Kcbv (λ f . bind Je2 Kcbv (λ x. f x))
bind Je1 Kcbv (λ x.Je2 Kcbv )
Figure 3: Wadler’s call-by-value translation of λ calculus.
2.3 Lambda calculus translation
The call-by-name and call-by-value translations given in Section 1.1 were first formally introduced by
Wadler [26]. In this section, we present a similar formal definition of our translation based on the malias
operation. For our source language, we use a simply-typed λ calculus with let-binding:
e ∈ Expr e ::= x | λ x.e | e1 e2 | let x = e1 in e2
τ ∈ Type τ ::= α | τ1 → τ2
The target language of the translation is identical but for one exception – it adds a type scheme M τ representing monadic computations. The call-by-name and call-by-value translation of the lambda calculus
are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. In the translation, we write >>= as bind. The translation
of types and typing judgements are omitted for simplicity and can be found in the original paper [26].
Our translation, called call-by-alias, is presented below. The translation has similar structure to
Wadler’s call-by-name translation, but it inserts malias operation in the last two cases:
Jα Kcba
Jτ1 → τ2 Kcba
= α
= M Jτ1 Kcba → M Jτ2 Kcba
JxKcba
Jλ x.eKcba
Je1 e2 Kcba
Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcba
=
=
=
=
x
unit (λ x.JeKcba )
bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind (malias Je2 Kcba ) f )
bind (malias Je1 Kcba ) (λ x.Je2 Kcba )
Jx1 : τ1 , . . . , xn : τn ⊢ e : τ Kcba = x1 : M Jτ1 Kcba , . . . , xn : M Jτn Kcba ⊢ JeKcba : M Jτ Kcba
The translation turns user-defined variables of type τ into variables of type M τ . A variable access x is
translated to a variable access, which now represents a computation (that may have effects). A lambda
expression is turned into a lambda expression wrapped in a pure monadic computation.
The two interesting cases are application and let-binding. When translating function application,
we bind on the computation representing the function. We want to call the function f with an aliased
computation as an argument. This is achieved by passing the translated argument to malias and then
applying bind again. The translation of let-binding is similar, but slightly simpler, because it does not
need to use bind to obtain a function.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
74
The definition of J−Kcba includes a well-typedness-preserving translation of typing judgements. The
details of the proof can be found in Appendix C. In the translation, let-binding is equivalent to (λ x.e2 ) e1 ,
but we include it to aid the intuition and to simplify motivating examples in the next section.
2.4 The meaning of malias laws
Having provided the translation, we can discuss the intuition behind the malias laws and what they imply
about the translated code. The naturality law specifies that malias is a natural transformation. Although
we do not give a formal proof, we argue that the law follows from the parametricity of the malias type
signature and can be obtained using the method described by Voigtländer [25].
Effect conservation. The meaning of associativity and identity can be informally demonstrated by
treating effects as units of information. Given a computation type involving a number of occurrences of
m, we say that there are effects (or information) associated with each occurrence of m.
The identity law specifies that join ◦ malias does not lose effects – given a computation of type m a,
the malias operation constructs a computation of type m (m a). This is done by splitting the effects of the
computation between two monadic computations. Requiring that applying join to the new computation
returns the original computation means that all the effects of the original computation are preserved,
because join combines the effects of the two computations.
The associativity law specifies how the effects should be split. When applying malias to an aliased
computation of type m (m a), we can apply the operation to the inner or the outer m. Underlining second
aliasing, the following two computations should be equal: m (m (m a)) = m (m (m a)). The law forbids
implementations that split the effects in an asymmetric way. For instance, if m a represents a step-wise
computation that can be executed by a certain number of steps, malias cannot execute the first half of
steps and return a computation that evaluates the other half. The proportions associated with individual
m values would be 1/4, 1/4 and 1/2 on the left and 1/2, 1/4 and 1/4 on the right-hand side.
Semantics-preserving transformations. The computationality and identity (again) laws also specify
that certain semantics-preserving transformations on the original source code correspond to equivalent
terms in the code translated using the call-by-alias transformation. The source transformations corresponding to computationality and identity, respectively, are the following:
let f = λ x.e1 in e2 ≡ e2 [ f ← λ x.e1 ]
let x = e in x ≡ e
The construction of the lambda function in the first equation is the only place where the translation inserts
unit. The computationality law can be applied when a lambda abstraction appears in a position where
malias is inserted. Thanks to the first monad law (Figure 1), the value assigned to f in the translation
is unit (λ x.e1 ), which is equivalent to the translation of a term after the substitution. In the second
equation, the left-hand side is translated as bind (malias e) id, which is equivalent to join (malias e), so
the equation directly corresponds to the identity law.
Discussion of completeness. The above discussion, together with the theoretical foundations introduced in the next section, supports the claim that our laws are necessary. We do not argue that our set of
laws is complete – for instance, we might want to specify that aliasing of an already aliased computation
has no effect, which is difficult to express in an equational form.
Tomas Petricek
75
However, the definition of completeness, in this context, is elusive. One possible approach that we
plan to investigate in future work is to expand the set of semantics-preserving transformations that should
hold, regardless of an evaluation strategy.
3
Computational semi-bimonads
In this section, we formally describe the structure that underlies a monad having a malias operation as
described in the previous section. Since the malias operation corresponds to an operation of a comonad
associated with a monad, we first review the definitions of a monad and a comonad. Monads are wellknown structures in functional programming. Comonads are dual structures to monads that are less
widespread, but they have also been used in functional programming and semantics (Section 5):
Definition 1. A monad over a category C is a triple (T, η , µ ) where T : C → C is a functor, η : IC → T
is a natural transformation from the identity functor to T , and µ : T 2 → T is a natural transformation,
such that the following associativity and identity conditions hold, for every object A:
• µA ◦ T µA = µA ◦ µTA
• µA ◦ ηTA = idTA = µA ◦ T ηA
Definition 2. A comonad over a category C is a triple (T, ε , δ ) where T : C → C is a functor, ε : T → IC
is a natural transformation from T to the identity functor, and δ : T → T 2 is a natural transformation
from T to T 2 , such that the following associativity and identity conditions hold, for every object A:
• T δA ◦ δA = δTA ◦ δA
• εTA ◦ δA = idTA = T εA ◦ δA
In functional programming terms, the natural transformation η corresponds to unit :: a → m a and
the natural transformation µ corresponds to join :: m (m a) → m a. A comonad is a dual structure to a
monad – the natural transformation ε corresponds to an operation counit :: m a → a and δ corresponds
to cojoin :: m a → m (m a). An equivalent formulation of comonads in functional programming uses an
operation cobind :: m a → (m a → b) → m b, which is dual to >>= of monads.
A simple example of a comonad is the product comonad. The type m a stores the value of a and some
additional state S, meaning that TA = A × S. The ε (or counit) operation extracts the value A ignoring the
additional state. The δ (or cojoin) operation duplicates the state. In functional programming, the product
comonad is equivalent to the reader monad TA = S → A.
In this paper, we use a special variant of comonads. Computational comonads, introduced by Brookes
and Geva [5], have an additional operation γ together with laws specifying its properties:
Definition 3. A computational comonad over a category C is a quadruple (T, ε , δ , γ ) where (T, ε , δ ) is
a comonad over C and γ : IC → T is a natural transformation such that, for every object A,
• εA ◦ γA = idA
• δA ◦ γA = γTA ◦ γA .
A computational comonad has an additional operation γ which has the same type as the η operation
of a monad, that is a → m a. In the work on computational comonads, the transformation γ turns an
extensional specification into an intensional specification without additional computational information.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
76
In our work, we do not need the natural transformation corresponding to counit :: m a → a. We define
a computational semi-comonad, which is a computational comonad without the natural transformation ε
and without the associated laws. The remaining structure is preserved:
Definition 4. A computational semi-comonad over a category C is a triple (T, δ , γ ) where T : C → C is
a functor, δ : T → T 2 is a natural transformation from T to T 2 and γ : IC → T is a natural transformation
from the identity functor to T , such that the following associativity and computationality conditions hold,
for every object A:
• T δA ◦ δA = δTA ◦ δA
• δA ◦ γA = γTA ◦ γA .
Finally, to define a structure that models our monadic computations with the malias operation, we
combine the definition of a monad and computational semi-comonad. We require that the two structures
share the functor T and that the natural transformation η : IC → T of a monad coincides with the natural
transformation γ : IC → T of a computational comonad.
Definition 5. A computational semi-bimonad over a category C is a quadruple (T, η , µ , δ ) where
(T, η , µ ) is a monad over a category C and (T, δ , η ) is a computational semi-comonad over C , such
that the following additional condition holds, for every object A:
• µA ◦ δA = idTA
The definition of computational semi-bimonad relates the monadic and comonadic parts of the structure using an additional law. Given an object A, the law specifies that taking TA to T 2 A using the natural
transformation δA of a comonad and then back to TA using the natural transformation µA is identity.
3.1 Revisiting the laws
The laws of computational semi-bimonad as defined in the previous section are exactly the laws of our
monad equipped with the malias operation. In this section, we briefly review the laws and present the
category theoretic version of all the laws demonstrated in Section 2.2. We require four laws in addition
to the standard monad laws (which are omitted in the summary below). A diagrammatic demonstration
is shown in Figure 4. For all objects A and B of C and for all f : A → B in C :
T 2 f ◦ δA
T δA ◦ δA
δA ◦ η A
µA ◦ δA
=
=
=
=
δB ◦ T f
δTA ◦ δA
ηTA ◦ ηA
idTA
(naturality)
(associativity)
(computationality)
(identity)
The naturality law follows from the fact that δ is a natural transformation and so we did not state it
explicitly in Definition 5. However, it is one of the laws that are translated to the functional programming
interpretation. The associativity law is a law of comonad – the other law in Definition 2 does not apply
in our scenario, because we only work with semi-comonad that does not have natural transformation ε
(counit). The computationality law is a law of a computational comonad and finally, the identity law is
the additional law of computational semi-bimonads.
Tomas Petricek
TA
δA
Tf
T 2A
T2 f
77
//
// T B
δB
T 2B
(naturality)
TA
δA
δA
T 2A
// T 2 A
T δA
δTA
// T 3 A
(associativity)
A
ηA
ηA
// TA
δA
TA
ηTA
// T 2 A
(computationality)
TA❉
idTA
❉❉
❉❉
❉❉
δA ❉""
T 2A
// TA
③<<
③
µA ③③
③③
③③
(identity)
Figure 4: Diagramatic representation of the four additional properties of semi-bimonads
4
Abstracting evaluation strategy in practice
In this section, we present several practical uses of the malias operation. We start by showing how to
write monadic code that is parameterized over the evaluation strategy and then consider expressing callby-need in this framework. Then we also briefly consider parallel call-by-need and the relation between
malias and joinads and the docase notation [19].
4.1 Parameterization by evaluation strategy
One of the motivations of this work is that the standard monadic translations for call-by-name and callby-value produce code with different structure. Section 2.3 gave a translation that can be used with both
of the evaluation strategies just by changing the definition of the malias operation. In this section, we
make one more step – we show how to write code parameterized by evaluation strategy.
We define a monad transformer [13] that takes a monad and turns it into a monad with malias that
implements a specific evaluation strategy. Our example can then be implemented using functions that
are polymorphic over the monad transformer. We continue using the previous example based on the IO
monad, but the transformer can operate on any monad.
As a first step, we define a type class named MonadAlias that extends Monad with the malias operation. To keep the code simple, we do not include comments documenting the laws:
class Monad m ⇒ MonadAlias m where
malias :: m a → m (m a)
Next, we define two new types that represent monadic computations using the call-by-name and call-byvalue evaluation strategy. The two types are wrappers that make it possible to implement two different
instances of MonadAlias for any underlying monadic computation m a:
newtype CbV m a = CbV {runCbV :: m a}
newtype CbN m a = CbN {runCbN :: m a}
The snippet defines types CbV and CbN that represent two evaluation strategies. Figure 5 shows the
implementation of three type classes for these two types. The implementation of the Monad type class is
the same for both types, because it simply uses return and >>= operations of the underlying monad. The
implementation of MonadTrans wraps a monadic computation m a into a type CbV m a and CbN m a,
respectively. Finally, the instances of the MonadAlias type class associate the two implementations of
malias (from Section 2.1) with the two data types.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
78
instance Monad m ⇒ Monad (CbV m) where
return v = CbV (return v)
(CbV a) >>= f = CbV (a >>= (runCbV ◦ f ))
instance Monad m ⇒ Monad (CbN m) where
return v = CbN (return v)
(CbN a) >>= f = CbN (a >>= (runCbN ◦ f ))
instance MonadTrans CbV where lift = CbV
instance MonadTrans CbN where lift = CbN
instance Monad m ⇒ MonadAlias (CbV m) where
malias m = m >>= (return ◦ return)
instance Monad m ⇒ MonadAlias (CbN m) where
malias m = return m
Figure 5: Instances of Monad, MonadTrans and MonadAlias for evaluation strategies
Example. Using the previous definitions, we can now rewrite the example from Section 1.1 using
generic functions that can be executed using both runCbV and runCbN. Instead of implementing malias
for a specific monad such as IO a, we use a monad transformer t that lifts the monadic computation to
either CbV IO a or to CbN IO a. This means that all functions will have constraints MonadTrans t, specifying that t is a monad transformer, and MonadAlias (t m), specifying that the computation implements
the malias operation.
In Haskell, this can be succinctly written using constraint kinds [3], that make it possible to define a
single constraint EvalStrategy t m that combines both of the conditions2 :
type EvalStrategy t m = (MonadTrans t, MonadAlias (t m))
Despite the use of the type keyword, the identifier EvalStrategy actually has a kind Constraint, which
means that it can be used to specify assumptions about types in a function signature. In our example, the
constraint EvalStrategy t IO denotes monadic computations based on the IO monad that also provide an
implementation of MonadAlias:
chooseSize :: EvalStrategy t IO ⇒ t IO Int → t IO Int → t IO Int
chooseSize new legacy = do
newVal ← new
if newVal > 0 then new else legacy
resultSize :: EvalStrategy t IO ⇒ t IO Int
resultSize = do
new ← malias $ lift (lookupInput "new_size")
legacy ← malias $ lift (lookupInput "legacy_size")
chooseSize new legacy
Compared to the previous version of the example, the only significant change is in the type signature of
the two functions. Instead of passing computations of type IO a, they now work with computations t IO a
2 Constraint
kinds are available in GHC 7.4 and generalize constraint families proposed by Orchard and Schrijvers [18]
Tomas Petricek
79
with the constraint EvalStrategy t IO. The result of lookupInput is still IO Int and so it needs to be lifted
into a monadic computation t IO Int using the lift function.
The return type of the resultSize computation is parameterized over the evaluation strategy t. This
means that we can call it in two different ways. Writing runCbN resultSize executes the function using
call-by-name and writing runCbV resultSize executes it using call-by-value. However, it is also possible
to implement a monad transformer for call-by-need.
4.2 Implementing call-by-need strategy
In his paper introducing the call-by-name and call-by-value translations for monads, Wadler noted: “It
remains an open question whether there is a translation scheme that corresponds to call-by-need as opposed to call-by-name” [26]. We do not fully answer this question, however we hope to contribute to the
answer. In particular, we show how to use the mechanism described so far to turn certain monads into an
extended versions of such monads that provide the call-by-need behaviour.
In the absence of effects, the call-by-need strategy is equivalent to the call-by-name strategy, with the
only difference in that performance characteristics. In the call-by-need (or lazy) strategy, a computation
passed as an argument is evaluated at most once and the result is cached afterwards.
The caching of results needs to be done in the malias operation. This cannot be done for any monad,
but we can define a monad transformer similar to the ones presented in the previous section. In particular,
we use Svenningsson’s package [22], which defines a transformer version of the ST monad [11]. As
documented in the package description, the transformer should be applied only to monads that yield a
single result. Combining lazy evaluation with non-determinism is a more complex topic that has been
explored by Fischer et al. [6].
newtype CbL s m a = CbL {unCbL :: STT s m a}
Unlike CbV and CbN, the CbL type is not a simple wrapper that contains a computation of type m a.
Instead, it contains a computation augmented with some additional state. The state is used for caching the
values of evaluated computations. The type STT s m a represents a computation m a with an additional
local state “tagged” with a type variable s. The use of a local state instead of e.g. IO means that the
monadic computation can be safely evaluated even as part of purely functional code. The tags are used
merely to guarantee that state associated with one STT computation does not leak to other parts of the
program.
Implementing the Monad and MonadTrans instances follows exactly the same pattern as instances of
other transformers given in Figure 5. The interesting work is done in the malias function of MonadAlias:
instance Monad m ⇒ MonadAlias (CbL s m) where
malias (CbL marg) = CbL $ do
r ← newSTRef Nothing
return (CbL $ do
rv ← readSTRef r
case rv of
Nothing → marg >>= λ v → writeSTRef r (Just v) >> return v
Just v → return v)
The malias operation takes a computation of type m a and returns a computation m (m a). The monad
transformer wraps the underlying monad inside STT, so the type of the computation returned by malias
is equivalent to a type STT s m (STT s m a).
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
80
The fact that both outer and inner STT share the same tag s means that they operate on a shared state.
The outer computation allocates a new reference and the inner computation can use it to access and
store the result computed previously. The allocation is done using the newSTRef function, which creates
a reference initialized to Nothing. In the returned (inner) computation, we first read the state using
readSTRef . If the value was computed previously, then it is simply returned. If not, the computation
evaluates marg, stores the result in a reference cell and then returns the obtained value.
Discussion. After implementing runCbL function (which can be done easily using runST), the example
in Section 4.1 can be executed using the CbL type. With the call-by-need semantics, the program finally
behaves as desired: if the value of the "new_size" key is greater than zero, then it reads it only once,
without reading the value of the "legacy_size" key. The value of "legacy_size" key is accessed
only if the value of the "new_size" key is less than zero.
Showing that the above definition corresponds to call-by-need formally is beyond the scope of this
paper. However, the use of STT transformer adds a shared state that keeps the evaluated values, which
closely corresponds to Launchbury’s environment-based semantics of lazy evaluation [9].
We do not formally prove that the malias laws hold for the above implementation, but we give an
informal argument. The naturality law follows from parametricity. Computations considered in the
associativity law are of type m (m (m a)); both sides of the equation create a computation where the
two outer m computations allocate a new reference (where the outer points to the inner) and the single
innermost m actually triggers the computation. The computationality law holds, because aliasing of a unit
computation cannot introduce any effects. Finally, the left-hand side of identity creates a computation
that allocates a new reference that is encapsulated in the returned computation and cannot be accessed
from elsewhere, so no sharing is added when compared with the right-hand side.
4.3 Parallel call-by-need strategy
In this section, we consider yet another evaluation strategy that can be implemented using our scheme.
The parallel call-by-need strategy [2] is similar to call-by-need, but it may optimistically start evaluating
a computation sooner, in parallel with the main program. When carefully tuned, the evaluation strategy
may result in a better performance on multi-core CPUs.
We present a simple implementation of the malias operation based on the monad for deterministic
parallelism by Marlow et al. [14]. By translating purely functional code to a monadic version using our
translation and the Par monad, we get a program that attempts to evaluate arguments of every function
call in parallel. In practice, this may introduce too much overhead, but it demonstrate that parallel
call-by-need strategy also fits with our general framework.
Unlike the previous two sections, we do not define a monad transformer that can embody any
monadic computation. For example, performing IO operations in parallel might introduce non-determinism.
Instead, we implement malias operation directly for computations of type Par a:
instance MonadAlias Par where
malias m = spawn m >>= return ◦ get
The implementation is surprisingly simple. The function spawn creates a computation Par (IVar a) that
starts the work in background and returns a mutable variable (I-structure) that will contain the result
when the computation completes. The inner computation that is returned by malias calls a function
get :: IVar a → Par a that waits until IVar has been assigned a value and then returns it.
Tomas Petricek
81
Using the above implementation of malias, we can now translate purely functional code to a monadic
version that uses parallel call-by-need instead of the previous standard evaluation strategies (that do not
introduce any parallelism). For example, consider a naive Fibonacci function:
fibSeq n | n 6 1 = n
fibSeq n = fibSeq (n − 1) + fibSeq (n − 2)
The second case calls the + operator with two computations as arguments. The translated version passes
these computations to malias, which starts executing them in parallel. The monadic version of the +
operator then waits until both computations complete. If we translate only the second case and manually
add a case that calls sequential version of the function for inputs smaller than 30, we get the following:
fibPar n | n < 30 = return (fibSeq n)
fibPar n = do
n1 ← malias $ fibPar (n − 1)
n2 ← malias $ fibPar (n − 2)
liftM2 (+) n1 n2
Aside from the first line, the code directly follows the general translation mechanism described earlier.
Arguments of a function are turned to monadic computations and passed to malias. The inner computations obtained using monadic bind are then passed to a translated function.
Thanks to the manual optimization that calls fibSeq for smaller inputs, the function runs nearly twice
as fast on a dual-core machine3 . Parallel programming is one of the first areas where we found the malias
operation useful. We first considered it as part of joinads, which are discussed in the next section.
Discussion. Showing that the above implementation actually implements parallel call-by-need could
be done by relating our implementation of malias to the multi-thread transitions of [2]. Informally, each
computation that may be shared is added to the work queue (using spawn) when it occurs on the righthand side of a let binding, or as an argument in function application. The queued work evaluates in
parallel with the main program and the get function implements sharing, so the semantics is lazy.
As previously, the naturality law holds thanks to parametricity. To consider other laws, we need
a formal model that captures the time needed to evaluate computations. We assume that evaluating a
computation created by unit takes no time, but all other computations take non-zero time. Moreover, all
spawned computations start executing immediately (i.e. the number of equally fast threads is unlimited).
In the associativity law, the left-hand side returns a computation that spawns the actual work and
then spawns a computation that waits for its completion. The right-hand side returns a computation
that schedules a computation, which then schedules the actual work. In both cases, the actual work
is started immediately when the outer m computation is evaluated, and so they are equivalent. The
computationality law holds, because a unit computation evaluates in no time. Finally, the left-hand
side of identity returns a computation that spawns the work and then waits for its completion, which is
semantically equivalent to just running the computation.
4.4 Simplifying Joinads
Joinads [20, 19] were designed to simplify programming with certain kinds of monadic computations.
Many monads, especially from the area of concurrent or parallel programming provide additional oper3 When
called with input 37 on a Core 2 Duo CPU, the sequential version runs in 8.9s and the parallel version in 5.1s.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
82
ations for composing monadic computations. Joinads identify three most common extensions: parallel
composition, (non-deterministic) choice and aliasing.
Joinads are abstract computations that form a monad and provide the three additional operations
mentioned above. The work on joinads also introduces a syntactic extension for Haskell and F# that
makes it easier to work with these classes of computations. For example, the following snippet uses the
Par monad to implement a function that tests whether a predicate holds for all leafs of a tree in parallel:
all :: (a → Bool) → Tree a → Par Bool
all p (Leaf v)
= return (p v)
all p (Node left right) =
docase (all p left, all p right) of
(False, ?) → return False
(?, False) → return False
(allL, allR) → return (allL ∧ allR)
The docase notation intentionally resembles pattern matching and has similar semantics as well. The
first two cases use the special pattern ? to denote that the value of one of the computations does not
have to be available in order to continue. When one of the sub-branches returns False, we know that the
overall result is False and so we return immediately. Finally, the last clause matches if neither of the two
previous are matched. It can only match after both sub-trees are processed.
Similarly to do notation, the docase syntax is desugared into uses of the joinad operations. The
choice between clauses is translated using the choice operator. If a clause requires the result of multiple
computations (such as the last one), the computations are combined using parallel composition.
If a computation, passed as an argument, is accessed from multiple clauses, then it should be evaluated only once and the clauses should only access aliased computation. This motivation is similar to the
one described in this article. Indeed, joinads use a variant of the malias operation and insert it automatically for all arguments of docase. This is very similar to how the translation presented in this paper uses
malias. If aliasing was not done automatically behind the scenes, we would have to write:
all p (Leaf v)
= return (p v)
all p (Node left right) = do
l ← malias (all p left)
r ← malias (all p right)
docase (l, r) of
(False, ?) → return False
(?, False) → return False
(allL, allR) → return (allL ∧ allR)
One of the limitations of the original design of joinads is that there is no one-to-one correspondence
between the docase notation and what can be expressed directly using the joinad operations. This is
partly due to the automatic aliasing of arguments, which inserts malias only at very specific locations. We
believe that integrating a call-by-alias translation, described in this article, in a programming language
could resolve this situation. It would also separate the two concerns – composition of computations using
choice and parallel composition (done by joinads) and automatic aliasing of computations that allows
sharing of results as in call-by-need or parallel call-by-need.
Tomas Petricek
5
83
Related work
Most of the work that directly influenced this work has been discussed throughout the paper. Most
importantly, the question of translating pure code to a monadic version with call-by-need semantics was
posed by Wadler [26]. To our knowledge, this question has not been answered before, but there is various
work that either uses similar structures or considers evaluation strategies from different perspectives.
Monads with aliasing. Numerous monads have independently introduced an operation of type m a →
m (m a). The eagerly combinator of the Orc monad [10] causes computation to run in parallel, effectively implementing the parallel call-by-need evaluation strategy. The only law that relates eagerly to
operations of a monad is too restrictive to allow the call-by-value semantics.
A monad for purely functional lazy non-deterministic programming [6] uses a similar combinator
share to make monadic (non-deterministic) computations lazy. However, the call-by-value strategy is
inefficient and the call-by-name strategy is incorrect, because choosing a different value each time a
non-deterministic computation is accessed means that generate and test pattern does not work.
The share operation is described together with the laws that should hold. The HNF law is similar
to our computationality. However, the Ignore law specifies that the share operation should not be strict
(ruling out our call-by-value implementation of malias). A related paper [4] discusses where share needs
to be inserted when translating lazy non-deterministic programs to a monadic form. The results may be
directly applicable to make our translation more efficient by inserting malias only when required.
Abstract computations and comonads. In this paper, we extended monads with one component of
a comonadic structure. Although less widespread than monads, comonads are also useful for capturing
abstract computations in functional programming. They have been used for dataflow programming [23],
array programming [17], environment passing, and more [8]. In general, comonads can be used to
describe context-dependent computations [24], where cojoin (natural transformation δ ) duplicates the
context. In our work, the corresponding operation malias splits the context (effects) in a particular way
between two computations.
We only considered basic monadic computations, but it would be interesting to see how malias
interacts with other abstract notions of computations, such as applicative functors [15], arrows [7] or
additive monads (the MonadPlus type-class). The monad for lazy non-deterministic programming [6],
mentioned earlier, implements MonadPlus and may thus provide interesting insights.
Evaluation strategies. One of the key results of this paper is a monadic translation from purely functional code to a monadic version that has the call-by-need semantics. We achieve that using the monad
transformer [13] for adding state.
In the absence of effects, call-by-need is equivalent to call-by-name, but it has been described formally as a version of λ -calculus by Ariola and Felleisen [1]. This allows equational reasoning about
computations and it could be used to show that our encoding directly corresponds to call-by-need, similarly to proofs for other strategies in Appendix A. The semantics has been also described using an
environment that models caching [9, 21], which closely corresponds to our actual implementation.
Considering the two basic evaluation strategies, Wadler [27] shows that call-by-name is dual to callby-value. We find this curious as the two definitions of malias in our work are, in some sense, also dual
or symmetric as they associate all effects with the inner or the outer monad of the type m (m a). Furthermore, the duality between call-by-name and call-by-value can be viewed from a logical perspective
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
84
thanks to the Curry-Howard correspondence. We believe that finding a similar logical perspective for our
generalized strategy may be an interesting future work.
Finally, the work presented in this work unifies monadic call-by-name and call-by-value. In a nonmonadic setting, a similar goal is achieved by the call-by-push-value calculus [12]. The calculus is more
fine-grained and strictly separates values and computations. Using these mechanisms, it is possible to
encode both call-by-name and call-by-value. It may be interesting to consider whether our computations
parameterized over evaluation strategy (Section 4.1) could be encoded in call-by-push-value.
6
Conclusions
We presented an alternative translation from purely functional code to monadic form. Previously, this
required choosing either the call-by-need or the call-by-value translation and the translated code had
different structure and different types in both cases. Our translation abstracts the evaluation strategy into
a function malias that can be implemented separately providing the required evaluation strategy.
Our translation is not limited to the above two evaluation strategies. Most interestingly, we show
that certain monads can be automatically turned into an extended version that supports the call-by-need
strategy. This answers part of an interesting open problem posed by Wadler [26]. The approach has
other interesting applications – it makes it possible to write code that is parameterized by the evaluation
strategy and it allows implementing a parallel call-by-need strategy for certain monads.
Finally, we presented the theoretical foundations of our approach using a model described in terms of
category theory. We extended the monad structure with an additional operation based on computational
comonads, which were previously used to give intensional semantics of computations. In our setting,
the operation specifies the evaluation order. The categorical model specifies laws about malias and we
proved that the laws hold for call-by-value and call-by-name strategies.
Acknowledgements. The author is grateful to Sebastian Fischer, Dominic Orchard and Alan Mycroft
for inspiring comments and discussion, and to the latter two for proofreading the paper. We are also
grateful to anonymous referees for detailed comments and to Paul Blain Levy for shepherding of the
paper. The work has been partly supported by EPSRC and through the Cambridge CHESS scheme.
References
[1] Zena M. Ariola & Matthias Felleisen (1997): The Call-By-Need Lambda Calculus. Journal of Functional
Programming 7, pp. 265–301, doi:10.1017/S0956796897002724.
[2] Clem Baker-Finch, David J. King & Phil Trinder (2000): An Operational Semantics for Parallel Lazy Evaluation. In: Proceedings of ICFP 2000, doi:10.1145/351240.351256.
[3] Max Bolingbroke (2011): Constraint Kinds for GHC (Unpublished manuscript). Available at http://blog.
omega-prime.co.uk/?p=127.
[4] B. Braßel, S. Fischer, M. Hanus & F. Reck (2011): Transforming Functional Logic Programs into Monadic
Functional Programs. In: Proceedings of WFLP 2010, LNCS 6559, pp. 30–47, doi:10.1.1.157.4578.
[5] Stephen Brookes & Shai Geva (1992): Computational Comonads and Intensional Semantics. In: Applications of Categories in Computer Science: Proceedings of the LMS Symposium, 177, pp. 1–44, doi:10.1.1.
45.4952.
[6] Sebastian Fischer, Oleg Kiselyov & Chung-chieh Shan (2011): Purely Functional Lazy Non-Deterministic
Programming. Journal of Functional Programming 21(4–5), pp. 413–465, doi:10.1145/1631687.1596556.
Tomas Petricek
85
[7] John Hughes (1998): Generalising Monads to Arrows. Science of Computer Programming 37, pp. 67–111,
doi:10.1016/S0167-6423(99)00023-4.
[8] Richard B. Kieburtz (1999): Codata and Comonads in Haskell (Unpublished manuscript).
[9] John Launchbury (1993): A Natural Semantics for Lazy Evaluation. In: Proceedings of POPL 1993, pp.
144–154, doi:10.1145/158511.158618.
[10] John Launchbury & Trevor Elliott (2010): Concurrent orchestration in Haskell. In: Proceedings of Haskell
Symposium, Haskell 2010, pp. 79–90, doi:10.1145/1863523.1863534.
[11] John Launchbury & Simon Peyton Jones (1995): State in Haskell. In: Proceedings of the LISP and Symbolic
Computation Conference, LISP 1995, doi:10.1007/BF01018827.
[12] Paul Blain Levy (2004): Call-By-Push-Value. Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4020-1730-8.
[13] Sheng Liang, Paul Hudak & Mark Jones (1995): Monad Transformers and Modular Interpreters. In: Proceedings of POPL 1995, doi:10.1145/199448.199528.
[14] Simon Marlow, Ryan Newton & Simon Peyton Jones (2011): A Monad for Deterministic Parallelism. In:
Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Haskell, Haskell 2011, doi:10.1145/2034675.2034685.
[15] Conor McBride & Ross Paterson (2008): Applicative Programming with Effects. Journal of Functional
Programming 18, pp. 1–13, doi:10.1017/S0956796807006326.
[16] Eugenio Moggi (1991): Notions of Computation and Monads. Inf. Comput. 93, pp. 55–92, doi:10.1016/
0890-5401(91)90052-4.
[17] Dominic Orchard, Max Bolingbroke & Alan Mycroft (2010): Ypnos: Declarative, Parallel Structured Grid
Programming. In: Proceedings of DAMP 2010, pp. 15–24, doi:10.1145/1708046.1708053.
[18] Dominic A. Orchard & Tom Schrijvers (2010): Haskell Type Constraints Unleashed. In: Proceedings of
FLOPS 2010, pp. 56–71, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-12251-4_6.
[19] Tomas Petricek, Alan Mycroft & Don Syme: Extending Monads with Pattern Matching. In: Proceedings of
Haskell Symposium, Haskell 2011, doi:10.1145/2096148.2034677.
[20] Tomas Petricek & Don Syme (2011): Joinads: A Retargetable Control-Flow Construct for Reactive, Parallel
and Concurrent Programming. In: Proceedings of PADL 2011, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18378-2_17.
[21] S. Purushothaman & Jill Seaman (1992): An Adequate Operational Semantics for Sharing in Lazy Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 4th European Symposium on Programming, doi:10.1007/3-540-55253-7_
26.
[22] Josef Svenningsson (2011): The STMonadTrans package. Available at http://hackage.haskell.org/
package/STMonadTrans-0.3.1.
[23] Tarmo Uustalu & Varmo Vene (2006): The Essence of Dataflow Programming. Lecture Notes in Computer
Science 4164, pp. 135–167, doi:10.1007/11894100_5.
[24] Tarmo Uustalu & Varmo Vene (2008): Comonadic Notions of Computation. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput.
Sci. 203, pp. 263–284, doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2008.05.029.
[25] Janis Voigtländer (2009): Free Theorems Involving Type Constructor Classes: Functional Pearl. In: Proceedings of ICFP 2009, ICFP 209, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 173–184, doi:10.1145/1596550.1596577.
[26] Philip Wadler (1990): Comprehending Monads. In: Proceedings of Conference on LISP and Functional
Programming, LFP 1990, ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 61–78, doi:10.1145/91556.91592.
[27] Philip Wadler (2003): Call-By-Value Is Dual to Call-By-Name. In: Proceedings of ICFP, ICFP 2003, pp.
189–201, doi:10.1145/944705.944723.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
86
Je1 e2 Kcba
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind (malias Je2 Kcba ) f ))
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind (unit Je2 Kcba ) f ))
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f . f Je2 Kcba )
= bind Je1 Kcbn (λ f . f Je2 Kcbn )
= Je1 e2 Kcbn
(translation)
(definition)
(left identity)
(induction hypothesis)
(translation)
Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcba
= bind (malias Je1 Kcba ) (λ x.Je2 Kcba )
= bind (unit Je1 Kcba ) (λ x.Je2 Kcba )
= (λ x.Je2 Kcba ) Je1 Kcba
= (λ x.Je2 Kcbn ) Je1 Kcbn
= Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcbn
(translation)
(definition)
(left identity)
(induction hypothesis)
(translation)
Figure 6: Proving that using an appropriate malias is equivalent to call-by-name.
A
Equivalence proofs
In this section, we show that our translation presented in Section 2.3 can be used to implement standard
call-by-name and call-by-value. We prove that using an appropriate definition of malias from Section 2.1
gives the same semantics as the standard translations described by Wadler [26].
Call-by-name. The translation of types is the same for our translation and the call-by-name translation.
In addition, the rules for translating variable access and lambda functions are also the same. This means
that we only need to prove that our translation of let-binding and function application are equivalent.
When implementing call-by-name using our translation, we use the following definition of malias:
malias m = unit m
Using this definition and the left identity monad law, we can now show that our call-by-alias translation
is equivalent to the translation from Figure 2. The Figure 6 shows the equations for function application
and let-binding.
Call-by-value. Proving that appropriate definition of malias gives a term that corresponds to the one
obtained using standard call-by-value translation is more difficult. In the call-by-value translation, functions are translated to a type τ1 → M τ2 , while our translation produces functions of type M τ1 → M τ2 .
As a reminder, the definition of malias that gives the call-by-value behaviour is the following:
malias m = bind m (unit ◦ unit)
To prove that the two translations are equivalent, we show that the following invariant holds: when using
the above definition of malias and our call-by-alias translation, a monadic computation of type M τ that
is assigned to a variable x always has a structure unit xv where xv is a variable of type τ .
The sketch of the proof is shown in Figure 7. We write e1 ∼
= e2 to mean that the expression e1 in
the call-by-alias translation corresponds to an expression e2 in call-by-value translation. This means that
expressions of form unit xv translate to values x, variable declarations of xv (in lambda abstraction and
let-binding) translate to declarations of x and all function values of type M τ1 → M τ2 become τ1 → M τ2 .
Tomas Petricek
87
JxKcba
= unit xv
∼
= x
= JxKcbv
(assumption)
(correspondence)
(translation)
Je1 e2 Kcba
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind (malias Je2 Kcba ) f )
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind (bind Je2 Kcba (unit ◦ unit)) f )
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind Je2 Kcba (λ xv .bind (unit (unit xv )) f ))
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ f .bind Je2 Kcba (λ xv . f (unit xv )))
∼
= bind Je1 Kcbv (λ f .bind Je2 Kcbv (λ x. f x))
= Je1 e2 Kcbv
(translation)
(definition)
(associativity)
(left identity)
(correspondence)
(translation)
Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcba
= bind (malias Je1 Kcba ) (λ x.Je2 Kcba )
= bind (bind Je1 Kcba (unit ◦ unit)) (λ x.Je2 Kcba )
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ xv .bind (unit (unit xv )) (λ x.Je2 Kcba ))
= bind Je1 Kcba (λ xv .(λ x.Je2 Kcba ) (unit xv ))
∼
= bind Je1 Kcbv (λ x.Je2 Kcbv )
= Jlet x = e1 in e2 Kcbv
(translation)
(definition)
(associativity)
(left identity)
(correspondence)
(translation)
Figure 7: Proving that using an appropriate malias is equivalent to call-by-value.
B
Proofs for two implementations
In this section, we prove that the two implementations of malias presented in Section 2.1 obey the malias
laws. We use the formulation of monads based on a functor with additional operations join and unit. The
proof relies on the following laws that hold about join and unit:
map (g ◦ f )
unit ◦ f
join ◦ map (map f )
join ◦ map join
join ◦ unit
=
=
=
=
=
(map g) ◦ (map f )
map f ◦ unit
map f ◦ join
join ◦ join
join ◦ map unit = id
(functor)
(natural unit)
(natural join)
(assoc join)
(identity)
The first law follows from the fact that map corresponds to a functor. The next two laws hold because
unit and join are both natural transformations. Finally, the last two laws are additional laws that are
required to hold about monads (a precise definition can be found in Section 3).
The proofs that the two definitions of malias (implementing call-by-name and call-by-value strategies) are correct can be found in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. The proofs use the above monad
laws. We use a definition malias ≡ map unit, which is equivalent to the definition in Appendix A. The figures include proofs for the four additional malias laws as defined in Section 2.2: naturality, associativity,
computationality and identity.
Evaluation strategies for monadic computations
88
map (map f ) ◦ malias
= map (map f ) ◦ unit
= unit ◦ map f
= malias ◦ map f
(definition)
(naturality)
(definition)
map malias ◦ malias
= map unit ◦ unit
= unit ◦ unit
= malias ◦ malias
(definition)
(natural unit)
(definition)
malias ◦ unit
= unit ◦ unit
(definition)
join ◦ malias
= join ◦ unit
= id
(definition)
(identity)
Figure 8: Call-by-name definition of malias obeys the laws
map (map f ) ◦ malias
= map (map f ) ◦ map unit
= map (map f ◦ unit)
= map (unit ◦ f )
= map unit ◦ map f
= malias ◦ map f
(definition)
(functor)
(natural unit)
(functor)
(definition)
map malias ◦ malias
= map (map unit) ◦ (map unit)
= map (map unit ◦ unit)
= map (unit ◦ unit)
= map unit ◦ map unit
= malias ◦ malias
(definition)
(functor)
(natural unit)
(functor)
(definition)
malias ◦ unit
= map unit ◦ unit
= unit ◦ unit
(definition)
(natural unit)
join ◦ malias
= join ◦ map unit
= id
(definition)
(identity)
Figure 9: Call-by-value definition of malias obeys the laws
Tomas Petricek
C
89
Typing preservation proof
In this section, we show that our translation preserves typing. Given a well-typed term e of type τ , the
translated term JeKcba is also well-typed and has a type Jτ Kcba . In the rest of this section, we write J−K
for J−Kcba . To show that the property holds, we use induction over the typing rules, using the fact that
Jτ K = M τ ′ for some τ ′ . The inductive construction of the typing derivation follows the following rules:
JΓ, x : τ ⊢ x : τ K
=
JΓK, x : M Jτ K ⊢ x : M Jτ K
JΓ, x : τ1 ⊢ e : τ2 K
JΓ ⊢ λ x.e : τ1 → τ2 K
=
JΓK, x : M Jτ1 K ⊢ JeK : M Jτ2 K
JΓK ⊢ unit (λ x.JeK) : M (M Jτ1 K → M Jτ2 K)
JΓ ⊢ e1 : τ1 → τ2 K JΓ ⊢ e2 : τ1 K
JΓ ⊢ e1 e2 : τ2 K
=
JΓK ⊢ Je1 K : M (M Jτ1 K → M Jτ2 K) Γ ⊢ Je2 K : M Jτ1 K
Γ ⊢ bind Je1 K (λ f .bind (malias Je2 K) f )) : M Jτ2 K
JΓ ⊢ e1 : τ1 K JΓ, x : τ1 ⊢ e2 : τ2 K
JΓ ⊢ let x = e1 in e2 : τ2 K
=
JΓK ⊢ Je1 K : M Jτ1 K JΓK, x : M Jτ1 K ⊢ Je2 K : M Jτ2 K
JΓK ⊢ bind (malias Je1 K) (λ x.Je2 K) : M Jτ2 K
| 6cs.PL
|
Relevant change points in high dimensional time series
Holger Dette, Josua Gösmann
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Fakultät für Mathematik
arXiv:1704.04614v2 [math.ST] 3 Nov 2017
44780 Bochum, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
November 7, 2017
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of detecting relevant change points in the mean vector,
say µt = (µ1,t , . . . , µd,t )T of a high dimensional time series (Zt )t∈Z . While the recent literature
on testing for change points in this context considers hypotheses for the equality of the means
(1)
(2)
µh and µh before and after the change points in the different components, we are interested
in a null hypothesis of the form
(1)
(2)
H0 : |µh − µh | ≤ ∆h
for all
h = 1, . . . , d
where ∆1 , . . . , ∆d are given thresholds for which a smaller difference of the means in the hth component is considered to be non-relevant. This formulation of the testing problem is
motivated by the fact that in many applications a modification of the statistical analysis might
not be necessary, if the differences between the parameters before and after the change points in
the individual components are small. This problem is of particular relevance in high dimensional
change point analysis, where a small change in only one component can yield a rejection by the
classical procedure although all components change only in a non-relevant way.
We propose a new test for this problem based on the maximum of squared and integrated
CUSUM statistics and investigate its properties as the sample size n and the dimension d
both converge to infinity. In particular, using Gaussian approximations for the maximum of a
large number of dependent random variables, we show that on certain points of the boundary
of the null hypothesis a standardised version of the maximum converges weakly to a Gumbel
distribution. This result is used to construct a consistent asymptotic level α test and a multiplier
bootstrap procedure is proposed, which improves the finite sample performance of the test. The
finite sample properties of the test are investigated by means of a simulation study and we also
illustrate the new approach investigating data from hydrology.
Keywords: high dimensional time series, change point analysis, CUSUM, relevant changes, precise hypotheses, physical dependence measure
AMS Subject Classification: 62M10, 62F05, 62G10
1
1
Introduction
In the context of high dimensional time series it is typically unrealistic to assume stationarity. A
simple form of non-stationarity, which is motivated by financial time series, where large panels
of asset returns routinely display break points, is to assume structural breaks at different times
(the change points) in the individual components. One goal of statistical inference is to correctly
estimate these “change points” such that the original data can be partitioned into shorter stationary
segments. This field is called change point analysis in the statistical literature and since the seminal
papers of Page (1954, 1955) numerous authors have worked on the problem of detecting structural
breaks or change points in various statistical models [see Aue and Horváth (2013) for a recent
review]. There exists in particular an enormous amount of literature on testing for and estimating
the location of a change in the mean vector µt = (µ1,t , . . . , µd,t )T = E [Zt ] of a multivariate time
series (Zt )nt=1 [see Chu et al. (1996), Horváth et al. (1999), Kirch et al. (2015) among others]. A
common feature in these references consists in the fact that the dimension, say d, of the time series
is fixed. High dimensional change point problems, where the dimension d increases with sample size
have only been recently considered in the literature [see Bai (2010), Zhang et al. (2010), Horváth
and Hus̆ková (2012) and Enikeeva and Harchaoui (2014), Jirak (2015a), Cho and Fryzlewicz (2015)
and Wang and Samworth (2016) among others]. Some of this work uses information across the
coordinates in order to detect smaller changes than could be observed in any individual component
series.
In the simplest case of one structural break in each component many authors attack the problem of detecting the change point by means of hypothesis testing. For example, Jirak (2015a)
investigates the hypothesis of no structural break in a high-dimensional time series by testing the
hypotheses
H0 : µh,1 = µh,2 = . . . = µh,n for all h = 1, . . . , d,
(1.1)
where µh,t denotes the h-th component of the mean vector µt of the random variable Zt (t =
1, . . . , n). The alternative is then formulated (in the simplest case of one structural break) as
(1)
H1 : µh
= µh,1 = µh,2 = · · · = µh,2
6=
(1.2)
µh,kh +1 = µh,kh +2 = · · · = µh,n =
(2)
µh
for at least one h ∈ {1, . . . , d},
where kh ∈ {1, . . . , n} denotes the (unknown) location of the change point in the h-th component.
While - even under sparsity assumptions - the detection of small changes in each component is
a very challenging problem, a modification of the statistical analysis (such as prediction) might not
be necessary if the actual size of change is small. For example, in risk management situations, one
is interested in fitting a suitable model for forecasting Value at Risk from data after the last change
point [see e.g. Wied (2013)], but in practice, small changes in the parameter are perhaps not very
interesting because they do not yield large changes in the Value at Risk. The forecasting quality
might only improve slightly, but this benefit could be negatively overcompensated by transaction
costs, in particular in high-dimensional portfolios. Moreover, even, if the null hypothesis (1.1) is not
rejected, it is difficult to quantify the statistical uncertainty for the subsequent statistical analysis
2
(conducted under the assumption of stationarity), as there is no control about the type II error in
this case.
The present work is motivated by these observations and proposes a test for the null hypothesis
of no relevant change point in a high dimensional context, that is
(1)
(2)
(1.3)
(1)
(2)
(1.4)
H0,∆ : |µh − µh | ≤ ∆h for all h = 1, . . . , d
versus HA,∆ : |µh − µh | > ∆h for at least one h ∈ {1, . . . , d},
(1)
(2)
where µh and µh are the parameters before and after the change point in the h-th component and
∆1 , . . . , ∆d are given thresholds for which a smaller difference of the means in the h-th component
is considered as non-relevant.
The problem of testing for a relevant difference between (one dimensional) means of two samples
has been discussed by numerous authors mainly in the field of biostatistics (see Wellek (2010) for
a recent review). In particular testing relevant hypotheses avoids the consistency problem as
mentioned in Berkson (1938), that is: Any consistent test will detect any arbitrary small change in
the parameters if the sample size is sufficiently large. Dette and Wied (2016) considered relevant
hypotheses in the context of change point problems for general parameters, but did not discuss the
high dimensional setup, where the dimension increases with sample size. In this case the statistical
problems are completely different.
The alternative approach requires the specification of the thresholds ∆h > 0, and this has to be
carefully discussed and depends on the specific application. We also note that the hypotheses
(1.3) contain the classical hypotheses (1.1), which are obtained by simply choosing ∆h = 0 for all
h = 1, . . . , d. Nevertheless we argue that from a practical point of view it might be very reasonable
to think about this choice more carefully and to define the size of change in which one is really
interested. In particular it is often known that ∆h 6= 0 although one is testing “classical hypotheses”
of the form (1.1) and (1.2). Moreover, a decision of no relevant structural break at a controlled
type I error can be easily achieved by interchanging the null hypothesis and alternative in (1.3),
i.e. considering the hypotheses
versus
e 0,∆ : |µ(1) − µ(2) | > ∆h for at least one h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
H
h
h
(1)
(2)
e
HA,∆ : |µ − µ | ≤ ∆h for all h = 1, . . . , d.
h
h
(1.5)
(1.6)
In this paper we propose for the first time a test for the hypotheses of a relevant structural break
in any of the components of a high dimensional time series. The basic ideas are explained in Section
2 (without going into any technical details), where we propose to calculate for any component the
integral of the squared CUSUM process and reject the null hypotheses whenever the maximum of
these integrals (calculated with respect to all components) is large. In order to obtain critical values
for this test we derive in Section 3 the asymptotic distribution of an appropriately standardized
version of the maximum as the sample size and the dimension converge to infinity. We also provide
several auxiliary results, which are of own interest, and investigate the case where the maximum is
only calculated over a subset of the components. These results are then used in Section 4 to prove
that the proposed test yields to a valid statistical inference, i.e. it is a consistent and asymptotic
3
level α test. It turns out that - in contrast to the classical change point problem - the analysis of
the test for no relevant structural breaks is substantially harder as the null hypothesis does not
correspond to a stationary process (non-relevant changes in the means are allowed). Section 5 is
devoted to the investigation of a multiplier block bootstrap procedure. In particular we prove that
the quantiles generated by this resampling method also yield to a consistent asymptotic level α test.
The finite sample properties of the new test are investigated in Section 6, where we also illustrate
our approach analysing a data example from hydrology. Finally some of the technical details are
deferred to Section 7.
2
Relevant changes in high dimensions - basic principles
In this Section we explain the basic idea of our approach to test for a relevant change in at least
one component of the mean vector of a high dimensional time series. For the sake of a transparent
representation we try to avoid technical details at this stage and refer to the subsequent sections,
where we present the basic assumptions and mathematical details establishing the validity of the
proposed method.
Throughout this paper we consider an array of real valued random variables {Zj,h }j∈Z,h∈N such
that
Zj,h = µj,h + Xj,h ,
(2.1)
where µj,h ∈ R for all j ∈ Z, h ∈ N and {Xj,h }j∈Z,h∈N denotes an array of centered and real valued
random variables, which implies µj,h = E [Zj,h ] for all j ∈ Z, h ∈ N. It follows from the assumptions
made in Section 3 that for each fixed d ∈ N the time series
{(Xj,1 , . . . , Xj,d )T }j∈Z
(2.2)
is stationary. Suppose that
Z1 = (Z1,1 , . . . , Z1,d )T , . . . , Zn = (Zn,1 , . . . , Zn,d )T ∈ Rd
are d-dimensional observations from the array {Zj,h }j∈Z,h∈N and assume that for each component
h ∈ {1, . . . , d} there exists an unknown constant th ∈ (0, 1), such that
(1)
µh = µj,h , j = 1, . . . , bnth c,
(2)
(2.3)
µh = µj,h , j = bnth c + 1, . . . , n,
where bxc = sup{z ∈ Z | z ≤ x} denotes the larges integer smaller or equal than x. In this case the
random variables {Zj,h }h=1,...,d;j=1,...,n also depend on n, i.e. they form a triangular array, but for
the sake of readability, we will suppress this dependence in our notation.
(1)
(2)
We define ∆µh = µh −µh as the unknown difference between the means in the h-th component
before and after the change point th . Note, that in the case ∆µh 6= 0 the actual location kh = bnth c
of the change point depends on the sample size n, which is a common assumption in the literature
4
on change point problems to perform asymptotic inference. It simply ensures that the number
of observations before and after the change point is growing proportional to n. For each h with
∆µh = 0 the observable process {Zj,h }j∈Z is stationary and to avoid misunderstandings we set
th = 1/2, whenever ∆µh = 0. The reader should notice that in this case the actual value is of no
interest in the following discussion. With this notation the hypotheses in (1.3) can be rewritten as
versus
H0,∆ : |∆µh | ≤ ∆h for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
(2.4)
HA,∆ : |∆µh | > ∆h for some h ∈ {1, . . . , d}.
(2.5)
To develop an appropriate test statistic for these hypotheses we rely on the widely used concept
of CUSUM-statistics. For each component h ∈ {1, . . . , d} we consider the corresponding CUSUMprocess for the h-th component defined by
bnsc
bnsc
n
1X
bnsc X
n − bnsc X
bnsc
Un,h (s) =
Zj,h − 2
Zj,h =
Zj,h − 2
n
n
n2
n
j=1
j=1
j=1
Under the assumptions stated in Section 3 it is shown in Section 7.1 that
Z 1
3
2
E
Un,h (s)ds = ∆µ2h + o(1)
(th (1 − th ))2
0
as n → ∞ and therefore our considerations will be based on the statistic
Z 1
3
2
U2n,h (s)ds,
M̂n,h =
2
(t̂h (1 − t̂h )) 0
n
X
Zj,h .
(2.6)
j=bnsc+1
(2.7)
(2.8)
where t̂h denotes an appropriate estimator for the unknown location th of the structural break,
that will be precisely defined in Section 3.2. The null hypothesis
H0,h : |∆µh | ≤ ∆h
(2.9)
of no relevant change in the h-th component will be rejected for large values of M̂2n,h , and in order
to determine a critical value we introduce the normalization
√
n
(∆)
T̂n,h =
(2.10)
M̂2n,h − ∆2h ,
τ̂h σ̂h ∆h
where σ̂h denotes an estimator for the unknown long-run variance (see Section 3.3 for a precise
definition), and the quantity τ̂h is a function of the estimate of the change point defined by
q
2 1 + 2t̂h (1 − t̂h )
√
τ̂h = τ (t̂h ) :=
,
(2.11)
5t̂h (1 − t̂h )
which arises due to the integral in equation (2.8). It will be shown in Section 7.3.2 that for a fixed
component h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
(∆)
D
T̂n,h =⇒ N (0, 1)
5
as n → ∞,
(2.12)
D
if ∆h = ∆µh , where the symbol =⇒ represents weak convergence of a random variable. Moreover
monotonicity arguments show that the test, which rejects the null hypothesis (2.9) of a relevant
(∆)
change point in the mean of the h-th component, whenever T̂n,h exceeds the (1 − α)-quantile of
the standard normal distribution, is a consistent asymptotic level α test.
In order to construct a test for the hypotheses H0,∆ versus HA,∆ in (2.4) and (2.5) of a relevant
change point in at least one of the components of a high dimensional time series we propose a
simultaneous test, which rejects the null hypothesis for large values of the statistic
d
(∆)
max T̂n,h .
h=1
Note that a similar approach has been investigated by Jirak (2015a), who considered the “classical”
change point problem in high dimension, that is
H0,class : |∆µh | = 0 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
versus
(2.13)
HA,class : |∆µh | > 0 for some h ∈ {1, . . . , d}.
(∆)
In this case the weak convergence (2.12) does not hold (in fact T̂n,h = oP (1) under H0,class ) and a
different statistic has to be considered.
As it is well known that the (adjusted) maximum of standard normal distributed random
variables converges weakly to a Gumbel distribution if they exhibit an appropriate dependence
structure [see for example Berman (1964))], it is reasonable to consider the following
d
(∆)
(2.14)
Td,n = ad max T̂n,h − bd
h=1
for the high-dimensional change point problem (2.4), where ad and bd denote appropriate sequences,
such that the left hand side converges weakly at specific points of the “boundary” of the parameter
space corresponding to the null hypothesis.
To make these arguments more precise, define the sequences
p
2 log d,
(2.15)
ad =
p
p
bd = ad − log(4π log d)/2ad = 2 log d − log(4π log d)/(2 2 log d),
(2.16)
and note that the parameter spaces corresponding to the null hypothesis (2.4) and the alternative
(2.5) are given by
n
o
H0 = (x, y) ∈ Rd × Rd |xh − yh | ≤ ∆h ∀h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
and HA = R2d \ H0 , respectively (here x = (x1 , . . . , xd )T , y = (y1 , . . . , yd )T ) denote d-dimensional
vectors). Define for k = 0, . . . , d the “(d − k)-dimensional boundary of the hypotheses (2.4) and
(2.5)” by
n
o
Ak = (x, y) ∈ R2d |xh − yh | ≤ ∆h ∀ h with equality for precisely k components ⊆ H0 . (2.17)
For the case d = 2, we illustrate this decomposition of the null hypothesis parameter space in
Figure 1. In fact, a large part of this paper is devoted to prove the following statements (under
appropriate assumptions - see Theorem 4.1 in Section 4):
6
Figure 1: Decomposition of the parameter space corresponding to the null hypothesis in (2.4) into
the sets A0 , A1 and A2 for the case d = 2 .
(1) If (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ad , the weak convergence
D
Td,n =⇒ G
holds as both n, d → ∞, where G denotes a Gumbel distribution, i.e.
P (G ≤ x) = e−e
−x
.
(2.18)
(1)
(2)
(2) If (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ak and there exists a constant C, such that |µh − µh | ≤ C < ∆h , whenever
(1)
(2)
|µh − µh | =
6 ∆h and limd→∞ k/d = c ∈ (0, 1], we have
D
Td,n =⇒ G + 2 log c
as n, d → ∞.
(3) If (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ak and limd→∞ k/d = 0 we have
D
Td,n =⇒ −∞
as n, d → ∞.
Let g1−α denote the (1 − α) quantile of the Gumbel distribution, then it follows from these considerations that the test which rejects H0,∆ in favour of the alternative hypothesis HA,∆ , whenever
Td,n > g1−α ,
7
(2.19)
is an asymptotic level α test. More precisely, it follows (under appropriate assumptions stated
below) that
PH0,∆ Td,n > g1−α −→
α
α0
0
if (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ad
if (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ak and limd→∞ k/d = c ∈ (0, 1]
(2.20)
if (µ(1) , µ(2) ) ∈ Ak and limd→∞ k/d = 0
as n, d → ∞, where 0 ≤ α0 ≤ α. Additionally the test is consistent (see Theorem 4.3). In the
following sections we will make these arguments more rigorous. Moreover, in order to improve the
finite sample approximation of the nominal level we also introduce a multiplier bootstrap procedure
and prove its consistency in Section 5.
3
Asymptotic properties
In this Section we provide the theoretical background for the test suggested in Section 2. We begin
introducing some notations and assumptions. After stating the main assumptions we provide in
Section 3.2 the asymptotic theory for an analogue of the statistic Td,n defined in (2.14), where
the centering in (2.10) is performed by the ”true” squared differences |∆µh |2 and the estimates
of the variances σh and the locations of the change points th have been replaced by their ”true”
counterparts. In Section 3.3 we introduce estimators for the locations of the structural breaks
(which may occur at a different location in each component) and investigate their consistency
properties. These are then used to define appropriate variance estimators (note that variances
have to be estimated in the case of changes in the mean). Finally, we consider in Section 3.4 the
asymptotic distribution of the maximum of the statistics (2.10) where again centering is performed
by |∆µh |2 instead of ∆2h . These results will then be used in the subsequent Section 4 to investigate
the statistical properties of the the test (2.19).
Throughout this paper we will use the following notation and symbols. Let x ∧ y and x ∨ y
define the minimum and maximum of two real numbers x and y, respectively. For an appropriately
integrable random variable Y and q ≥ 1, let kY kq = E [|Y |q ]1/q denote the Lq -norm. By the symbols
D
P
=⇒ and −→ we denote weak convergence and convergence in probability, respectively. Moreover,
we use the notation xn . yn , whenever the inequality xn ≤ C · yn , holds for some constant C > 0
which does not depend on the sample size and dimension and whose actual value is of no further
interest. Due to its frequent appearance, G will always represent a (standard) Gumbel distribution
defined by (2.18). In the high dimensional setup the dimension d converges to infinity with n → ∞.
Recall the definition of model (2.1) and assume that the time series {Xj,h }j∈Z,h∈N forms a
physical system [see e.g. Wu (2005)], that is
Xj,h = gh (εj , εj−1 , . . . ) ,
(3.1)
where {εj }j∈Z is a sequence of i.i.d. random variables with values in some measure space S such
that for each h ∈ N the function gh : SN → R is measurable. Note that it follows from (3.1) that
8
the time series defined in (2.2) is stationary. Let ε00 be an independent copy of ε0 and define
0
Xj,h
= gh (εj , εj−1 , . . . , ε1 , ε00 , ε−1 , . . . ).
(3.2)
0 is used to quantify the (temporal) dependence
The distance between Xj,h and its counterpart Xj,h
of the physical system, and for this purpose we introduce the coefficients
0
ϑj,h,p := kXj,h − Xj,h
kp ,
(3.3)
which measure the influence of ε0 on the random variable Xj,h . Let us also define some additional
parameters. For h, i ∈ N
φh,i (j) = Cov(X0,h , Xj,i ) = Cov(Z0,h , Zj,i )
denotes the covariance function of the h-th and i-th component at lag j Accordingly, the autocovariance function for the h-th component is given by φh (j) = φh,h (j) = Cov(X0,h , Xj,h ) and we
obtain the well-known representations
X
X
φh (j)
(3.4)
γh,i =
φh,i (j) and σh2 =
j∈Z
j∈Z
for the long-run covariance and long-run variance, respectively. If we have σh , σi > 0, we can
additionally define the long-run correlations by
ρh,i =
γh,i
σh σi
(3.5)
and it will be crucial for our work, that these quantities become sufficiently small with an increasing
temporal distance |h − i|. This will be precisely formulated in the following section.
3.1
Assumptions
Operating in a high-dimensional framework usually needs stronger assumptions than those for the
finite-dimensional case. Mainly, we need uniform dependence and moment conditions among all
components to exclude extreme cases and to ensure, that the unknown parameters can be estimated
accurately. In the high-dimensional setup considered in this paper the number of parameters
th , σh grows together with the dimension d, since even under the null hypothesis of no relevant
change points each component exhibits its own variance and change point structure. The precise
assumptions made in this paper are the following.
Assumption 3.1 (temporal assumptions) Suppose that there exist constants δ ∈ (0, 1) and σ− > 0
such that for some p > 4 the physical dependence coefficients ϑj,h,p and long run variances σh defined
in (3.3) and (3.4), respectively, satisfy
(T1) suph∈N ϑj,h,p . δ j ,
There exists constants 0 < σ− ≤ σ+ such that for all h ∈ N
9
(T2) σ− ≤ inf h∈N σh ≤ σ+ .
Assumption 3.2 (spatial assumptions) The dimension d increases with the sample size at a polynomial rate, i.e. we assume that for constants C1 and D
(S1) d = C1 nD ,
where the exponent D satisfies
(S2) 0 < D < min{p/2 − 2, p/2 − B(p/2 + 1) − 1},
and p refers to the Lp -norm k · kp used to measure the physical dependence in Assumption 3.1.
Here B ∈ (0, 1) denotes a constant used to control the bandwidth of an variance estimator, that
will be defined in Section 3.4. Further we assume for the long-run correlations in (3.5)
(S3) sup|h−i|>1 |ρh,i | ≤ ρ+ < 1,
(S4) |ρh,i | ≤ C2 log(|h − i| + 2)−2−η ,
where ρ+ > 0, η > 0 and C2 > 0 denote global constants.
Assumption 3.3 (moment assumptions) Suppose, that there exists a positive sequence (Md )d∈N
and constants C3 > 1 and C4 > 0, such that
(M1) maxdh=1 E [exp(|X1,h |/Md )] ≤ C3
(M2) Md ≤ C4 nm with m < 3/8.
Assumption 3.4 (location of the change points) There exists a constant t ∈ (0, 1/2), such that
for all h ∈ N the unknown locations bnth c of the structural breaks satisfy
(C1) t ≤ th ≤ 1 − t.
Let us give a brief explanation for the Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4. The temporal Assumptions (T1)
and (T2) define the temporal dependence structure and bounds for the long-run variance. Further
(T1) implies the existence of the quantities σh , γh,i and ρh,i defined in (3.4) and (3.5). Condition
(S3) and (S4) refer to the spatial dependence and are only needed to derive the desired extreme
value convergence. Assumption (S1) gives a relation between the number of observations and its
dimension, while (S2) is a slightly technical assumption, which enables reasonable estimations of
the variance σh and the locations th of the structural breaks. For a proof of the uniform consistency
of the estimates for the latter quantity we must further rely on Assumption (C1), which makes
the change points identifiable and is a common assumption in the literature. Roughly speaking,
it simply ensures to have enough data before and after the change point in each component.
Assumptions (S1) and (S2) together with n → ∞ directly imply d → ∞. It is also worth mentioning,
that (S1) can be replaced by d . nD , if one additionally supposes that d → ∞.
10
The moment Assumptions (M1) and (M2) are required for a Gaussian approximation and are
satisfied, if {Xj,h }j∈Z,h∈{1,...,d} is stationary with respect to the index j and for each h ∈ N the
random variable X1,h is sub-Gaussian with parameters vh , Vh > 0, i.e.
E [exp(λX1,h )] ≤ Vh exp(λ2 vh ),
for all λ ∈ R,
where the constants (vh )h=1,...,d and (Vh )h=1,...,d satisfy
d
max vh < n3/4 and
h=1
max Vh ≤ C.
h∈N
√
for some constant C > 0. Choosing Md = maxdh=1 vh we directly obtain condition (M2). Condition (M1) follows by a straightforward calculation, that is
d
d
h=1
h=1
2
max E [exp(|X1,h |/Md )] ≤ 2 max Vh evh /Md ≤ 2Ce < ∞.
3.2
Asymptotic properties - known variances and locations
In this section we assume that the locations th of the changes and the long-run variances σh are
known. Recalling the approximation (2.7) we define
Z 1
1
(3.6)
U2 (s)ds
M2n,h =
(th (1 − th ))2 0 n,h
and investigate the asymptotic properties of the maximum of the statistics
√
n
Tn,h =
M2n,h − ∆µ2h ,
τh σh |∆µh |
(3.7)
where τh = τ (th ) and the function τ is defined by (2.11). Note that Tn,h is the analogue of the
(∆)
statistic T̂n,h , where the thresholds ∆h , estimates t̂h and σ̂h have been replaced by the unknown
quantities ∆µh , th and σh , respectively. Our first result shows that an appropriate standardized
version of the maximum of the statistics Tn,h converges weakly to a Gumbel distribution. The
proof is complicated and we indicate the main steps in this section deferring the more technical
arguments to the appendix - see Section 7.
Theorem 3.5 Assume that the Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 are satisfied and that additionally there exist
constants C` , Cu (independent of h and d) such that the inequalities C` ≤ |∆µh | ≤ Cu hold for all
h = 1, . . . , d . Then
d
D
ad max Tn,h − bd =⇒ G
h=1
as d, n → ∞, where the sequences ad and bd are defined in (2.15) and (2.16), respectively.
Proof of Theorem 3.5 (main steps). Observing the definition (3.6) and (3.7) we obtain by a
straightforward calculation the representation
Z 1
√
3 n
(1)
(2)
2
2
(3.8)
Tn,h =
Un,h (s)ds − µh (s, th )ds = Tn,h + Tn,h ,
2
(th (1 − th )) τh σh |∆µh |
0
11
where
µh (s, th ) = (th ∧ s − sth ) (µh,1 − µh,2 )
(1)
(3.9)
(2)
and the statistics Tn,h and Tn,h are defined by
(1)
Tn,h
(2)
Tn,h
√
Z 1
3 n
=
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds,
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
√
Z 1
6 n
=
µh (s, th )(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))ds.
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
For the following discussion, we introduce the additional notation
√
Z 1
6 n
(2)
T̄n,h =
µh (s, th ) (Un,h (s) − E [Un,h (s)]) ds,
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
(3.10)
(3.11)
(3.12)
(1)
Our first auxiliary result shows that the first term Tn,h in the decomposition (3.8) is asymptotically
negligible and is proved in Section 7.2.1.
Lemma 3.6 If the assumptions of Theorem 3.5 are satisfied, we have
d
(1)
P
ad max Tn,h −→ 0
h=1
as d, n → ∞, where the sequence ad is defined in (2.15).
(2)
By Lemma 3.6 it suffices now to deal with the term Tn,h . The next step in the proof of Theorem
(2)
3.5 consists in a (uniform) approximation of the distribution of the maximum of the statistics T̄n,h
by of the distribution of the maximum of (dependent) Gaussian random variables. The proof of
the following result is given in Section 7.2.2, where we make use of new developments on Gaussian
approximations for maxima of sums of random variables [see Chernozhukov et al. (2013) and Zhang
and Cheng (2016).
Lemma 3.7 If the Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 are satisfied, there exists a Gaussian distributed random
vector N = (N1 , . . . , Nd )T with mean E [N ] = 0 and covariance matrix (Σh,i )dh,i=1 , such that
d
d
(2)
sup P max T̄n,h ≤ x − P max Nh ≤ x = o(1)
x∈R
h=1
h=1
for d, n → ∞. Moreover, the entries of the matrix Σ are bounded by |Σh,i | ≤ |ρh,i |, where ρh,i are
the long-run correlations defined in (3.5).
By Lemma 3.7 it suffices to establish the desired limiting distribution for the maximum of a Gaussian
distributed vector. Nowadays, this is a well-understood area of mathematics and we can rely on
results of Berman (1964), who originally examined the behavior of the maximum of dependent
Gaussian random variables. A straightforward adaption of these arguments shows that the sequence
of random variables {Ni }i∈N constructed in Lemma 3.7 satisfies
12
d
D
ad max Nh − bd =⇒ G
(3.13)
h=1
as d → ∞, where the sequences ad and bd are defined in (2.15) and (2.16), respectively.
Now, combining Lemma 3.7 and (3.13) directly leads to
d
D
(2)
ad max T̄n,h − bd =⇒ G.
h=1
By the assumption |∆µh | ≤ Cu it follows that maxdh=1 (µh (s, th ) − E [Un,h (s)]) = O(n−1 ), which
yields
d
D
(2)
ad max Tn,h − bd =⇒ G.
(3.14)
h=1
(1)
Due to Tn,h ≥ 0, we obtain the inequalities
d
d
d
d
(1)
(2)
(2)
ad max Tn,h − bd ≤ ad max Tn,h − bd ≤ ad max Tn,h + ad max Tn,h − bd ,
h=1
h=1
h=1
h=1
which together with Lemma 3.6 yields the assertion of Theorem 3.5.
In the next step we will replace the unknown quantities th and σh in (3.7) by suitable estimators,
say t̂h and σ̂h , and obtain the statistics
√
n
T̂n,h =
(3.15)
M̂2n,h − ∆µ2h , h ∈ {1, . . . , d} .
τ̂h σ̂h |∆µh |
(∆)
We emphasize again that the statistics T̂n,h do not coincide with the statistics T̂n,h in (2.10), which
(1)
(2)
are actually used in the test (2.19) except in the case where ∆µ2h = |µh − µh |2 = ∆2h for all
h = 1, . . . , d. Thus centering is still performed with respect to the unknown difference of the means
before and after the change points. In the following two subsections we give a precise definition of
the two estimators and derive an analogue of Theorem 3.5 in the case of estimated change points
and variances.
3.3
Estimation of long-run variances and change point locations
Determining the relative locations th of the structural breaks and constructing an estimator for
the long-run variances σh for all components h ∈ {1, . . . , d} is a rather difficult task in a high
dimensional setting. A further difficulty in the problem of testing for relevant structural breaks
consists in the fact that even under the null hypothesis there may appear structural breaks in
the mean and the corresponding process is not stationary. Therefore in contrast of testing the
“classical” hypotheses in (2.13) the construction of a suitable variance estimator is not trivial. A
P
standard long-run variance estimator in terms of i≤βn φ̂h (i) for an increasing sequence {βn }n∈N
and appropriate estimators φ̂h (i) of the auto-covariance from the full sample may not be consistent
due to possible changes of the mean.
13
Following Jirak (2015a) we define for each component h = 1, . . . , d the sets
Dh,1 := {Zj,h | 1 ≤ j ≤ bnth c}
and Dh,2 := {Zj,h | bnth c < j ≤ n} ,
which are the observations before and after the (unknown) change point bnth c, respectively. Since
these points are usually unknown, we need to estimate them and for this purpose we propose the
common estimator
bnsc
t̂h := argmax Un,h (s) = argmax
X
s∈(t,1−t)
j=1
s∈(t,1−t)
n
Zj,h −
bnsc X
Zj,h .
n
(3.16)
j=1
The following Lemma shows that these estimators are uniformly consistent with respect to all
components, where a change point exists. Its proof follows by an adaption of Corollary 3.1 in Jirak
(2015a), and is therefore omitted.
Lemma 3.8 Let
Sd = {1 ≤ h ≤ d | |∆µh | = 0} .
(3.17)
denote the set of all components h ∈ {1, . . . , d}, where the corresponding time series {Zj,h }j∈Z is
stationary, and define
µ?d = minc |∆µh |.
h∈Sd
(3.18)
Suppose that Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 are satisfied and assume further that the condition
lim sup
d,n→∞
log n
= 0.
µ?d n
(3.19)
is satisfied. Then for a sufficiently small constant C > 0 it holds that
maxc |t̂h − th | = oP (n−C ),
h∈Sd
Moreover, if additional the condition µ?d ≥ C` holds for some constant C` > 0 it follows that
maxc |t̂h − th | = oP (n−1/2 ).
h∈Sd
Roughly speaking condition (3.19) guarantees that the decreasing sequence µ?d does not converge
too fast to 0 if the dimension of the time series converge to infinity. Otherwise it is not possible to
identify the (relative) locations of all change points simultaneously.
In view of Lemma 3.8 it is reasonable to estimate the unknown sets Dh,1 and Dh,2 by
bh,1 : = Zj,h | 1 ≤ j ≤ n max{S t̂h , t} ,
D
(3.20)
bh,2 : = Zj,h | n − n max{S(1 − t̂h ), t} < j ≤ n ,
D
2 and σ̂ 2 be the
respectively, where S ∈ (0, 1) denotes a user-specified separation constant. Let σ̂h,1
h,2
bh,1 and D
bh,2 , respectively. Then we
standard long-run variance estimators based on the samples D
14
2 and σ̂ 2 to estimate the long run variances σ 2 , for example
can use any convex combination of σ̂h,1
h,2
h
2 + σ̂ 2 ). To simplify the technical arguments in Section 7 we consider a truncated
σ̂h2 = 21 (σ̂h,1
h,2
version, that is
2
2
σ̂h2 = min s2+ , max s2− , ( 12 (σ̂h,1
+ σ̂h,2
) .
(3.21)
where 0 < s− and s+ are a sufficiently small and large constant, respectively. The following
statement is a straightforward implication of the results in Section 3 of Jirak (2015a) and yields
the consistency of these estimators (uniformly with respect to the spatial component).
Lemma 3.9 Suppose that Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 are satisfied and additionally that there exists a
constant C` > 0 such that the inequality C` ≤ |∆µh | hold for all h = 1, . . . , d. Then we have
d
max |σ̂h − σh | = op n−η
h=1
for a sufficiently small constant η > 0.
3.4
Weak convergence
Equipped with Lemmas 3.8 and 3.9 we are now able to state the main result of this section, which
will be proved in Section 7.2.3.
Theorem 3.10 If the assumptions of Theorem 3.5 are satisfied, then the statistics T̂n,h defined in
(3.15) satisfy
d
D
Td,n = ad max T̂n,h − bd =⇒ G
(3.22)
h=1
as d, n → ∞, where the sequences ad and bd are defined in (2.15) and (2.16), respectively.
(∆)
Recall again that the statistics T̂n,h and T̂n,h in (2.10) do not coincide in general. Thus Theorem
3.10 does not show that the test (2.19) is an asymptotic level α test because it does not cover all
parameter configurations of the the null hypothesis (2.4). However, if the vector (µ(1) , µ(2) ) is an
(∆)
element of the set Ad defined in (2.17) we have T̂n,h = T̂n,h and it follows from this result that the
probability of rejection converges to α, that is
lim P(µ(1) ,µ(2) )∈Ad Td,n > g1−α = α.
d,n→∞
We conclude this section with a result, which can be used to control the type I error of the test
(2.19) for other values of the vector (µ(1) , µ(2) ).
Corollary 3.11 Let {Md }d∈N be an increasing sequence of subsets of {1, . . . , d} (as d, n → ∞). If
the assumptions of Theorem 3.5 hold, then
G if limd→∞ |Md |/d = 1
D
ad max T̂n,h − bd =⇒
G + 2 log c if limd→∞ |Md |/d = c for some c ∈ (0, 1),
h∈Md
−∞ if limd→∞ |Md |/d = 0.
Irrespective of the sequence {Md }d∈N , the bound
lim sup P ad max T̂n,h − bd > x ≤ P (G > x)
d,n→∞
h∈Md
is valid for all x ∈ R.
15
(3.23)
4
Relevant changes in high dimensional time series
Recall the problem of testing the hypotheses of a relevant change defined in (2.4) and (2.5). We
propose to reject the null hypothesis of no relevant change in any component of the high dimensional
mean vector, whenever the inequality (2.19) holds, that is Td,n > g1−α , where the test statistic
Td,n is defined in (2.14) and g1−α denotes the (1 − α) quantile of the Gumbel distribution. The
following two results make the discussion at the end of Section 2 rigorous and show that the test
introduced in (2.19) defines in fact a consistent and asymptotic level α test.
Theorem 4.1 Suppose that the Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 are satisfied, α ∈ (0, 1 − e−1 ] and that there
exist constants ∆− , ∆+ such that the thresholds ∆h satisfy the inequalities
0 < ∆− ≤ ∆h ≤ ∆+ < ∞
(4.1)
for all h = 1, . . . , d. Then, under the null hypothesis H0,∆ of no relevant change, it follows
lim sup P (Td,n > g1−α ) ≤ α.
(4.2)
d,n→∞
Moreover, let Bd = {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | ∆h = |∆µh |} and assume further that
∆h − |∆µh | ≥ C∆ > 0 for all h ∈ Bdc ,
for some constant C∆ > 0, then, under H0,∆ , we have
G if limd→∞ |Bd |/d = 1,
D
Td,n =⇒
G + 2 log c if limd→∞ |Bd |/d = c for c ∈ (0, 1),
−∞ if limd→∞ |Bd |/d = 0.
(4.3)
(4.4)
Remark 4.2 Condition (4.1) is actually not a very strong restriction since the thresholds ∆h
are defined by the user. Nevertheless, the condition is crucial since we use the factor 1/∆h as a
(∆)
normalisation in the statistics T̂n,h defined in (2.10). Note that under the null hypothesis (2.4) the
inequality ∆h ≤ ∆+ is equivalent to |∆µh | ≤ Cu , which was one of the assumptions in Theorem
3.10. Consequently the assertion of Theorem 4.1 follows from Theorem 3.10 in the case where
|∆µh | = ∆h for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}. However, in the general case the proof of Theorem 4.1 is more
complicated and deferred to Section 7.3.1, where we also handle the case |∆µh | < ∆h .
In the following result we investigate the consistency of the new test. Interestingly it requires
less assumptions than Theorem 4.1.
Theorem 4.3 Suppose that the Assumptions (T1), (T2) and (C1) hold. Then under the alternative
hypothesis HA,∆ of at least one relevant change point we have
P
Td,n −→ ∞,
as d, n → ∞, which in particular gives
lim P (Td,n > g1−α ) = 1.
d,n→∞
16
If the test (2.19) rejects the null hypothesis H0,∆ in (2.4) we conclude (at a controlled type I error)
that there is at least one component with a relevant change in mean. As there could exist relevant
changes in several components, the next step in the statistical inference is the identification of the
set
Rd = {1 ≤ h ≤ d | |∆µh | > ∆h } ,
(4.5)
of all components with a relevant change. Note that the hypotheses in (2.4) and (2.5) are equivalent
to H0,∆ : Rd = ∅ versus HA,∆ : Rd 6= ∅ . In light of Theorem 4.1 and 4.3 a natural estimator for
this set is therefore given by
n
o
b d (α) = 1 ≤ h ≤ d | T̂ (∆) > g1−α /ad + bd .
R
(4.6)
n,h
The following theorem provides a consistency result of this estimate.
Theorem 4.4 Suppose that the Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 hold and assume additionally that there exist
two constants 0 < C < 1/2, Cu > 0 such that
nC min (|∆µh | − ∆h ) = ∞ and
h∈Rd
max |∆µh | ≤ Cu .
h∈Rd
(4.7)
Then, the set estimator defined in (4.6) satisfies for α ∈ (0, 1 − e−1 ]
b d (α) = 1.
lim P Rd ⊂ R
(4.8)
Moreover we have the following lower bound
b d (α) ≥ 1 − α.
lim inf P Rd = R
(4.9)
d,n→∞
d,n→∞
5
Bootstrap
The testing procedure introduced in the previous sections is based on the weak convergence of the
maximum of appropriately standardized statistics to a Gumbel distribution, and it is well known
that the speed of convergence in limit theorems of this type is rather slow. As a consequence the
approximation of the nominal level of the test (2.19) for finite sample sizes may not be accurate.
A common way to improve the performance of the test, is to obtain the critical values from an
appropriate bootstrap procedure.
In the context of testing for relevant change points the construction of an appropriate resampling procedure is not obvious as - in contrast to classical change point problems - the parameter
space under the null hypothesis is rather large. In particular it will be necessary to simulate the
distribution of the statistic Td,n in case |∆µh | = ∆h for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d} such that one can replace
the quantile of the Gumbel distribution by the corresponding quantile of the bootstrap statistics.
A further problem is to mimic the dependence of the underlying times series, which we will address employing a Gaussian multiplier bootstrap, where observations are block-wise multiplied with
independent Gaussian random variables [see Künsch (1989) or Lahiri (2003)].
17
To handle the problem of potential change points under the null hypothesis (2.4) of no relevant
changes, observations from blocks in a neighborhood of estimated change points will not be used in
the estimate. Furthermore, components without a change point will be ignored when the bootstrap
statistic is constructed. We begin describing this idea in more detail and show in Theorem 5.5,
that the bootstrap statistic converges weakly to a Gumbel distribution as well. In the sequel we
assume without loss of generalization that n = KL and will split the sample into L blocks of length
K, and additionally
L ∼ n` and K ∼ n1−` for ` ∈ (0, 1).
(5.1)
We obtain the following quantities, which control the number of blocks before and after the estimated change point.
b − = sup{` ∈ N | `K + K/2 ≤ t̂h n},
L
h
+
b
Lh = inf{` ∈ N | `K − K/2 ≥ t̂h n},
(5.2)
where t̂h denotes the estimator of the location th of the change in the h-th component defined in
Section 3.4. The corresponding sample means are given by
b−
KL
1
1 Xh
−
Zj,h and Z̄h+ =
Z̄h =
−
b
b+ )
KL
K(L − L
h j=1
h
KL
X
Zj,h ,
(5.3)
b + +1
j=K L
h
which can be used to define an estimator for the unknown amount of change ∆µh = µh,1 − µh,2 in
the h-th component, that is
∆b
µh = Z̄h− − Z̄h+ .
Moreover, these estimators can also be used to
−
Zj,h − Z̄h
Zbj,h =
0
+
Zj,h − Z̄h
(5.4)
define the “mean corrected” sample
b− ,
for j ≤ K L
h
b− < j ≤ K L
b+ ,
for K L
h
h
+
b ,
for j > K L
h
.
(5.5)
Finally, we define blocking variables (that are sums with respect to the different blocks) as
Vb`,h (k) =
`K
X
Zbj,h I{j ≤ k}
(5.6)
j=(`−1)K+1
and introduce the notation
`K
X
Vb`,h = Vb`,h (n) =
bj,h .
Z
j=(`−1)K+1
From the representation (5.5) we directly obtain, that blocks near to the estimator t̂h are ignored,
i.e. we have
b − + 1, . . . , L
b + }.
Vb`,h = 0 if ` ∈ {L
h
h
18
Further denote by
Zn = σ(Zj,h | 1 ≤ j ≤ n, 1 ≤ h ≤ d)
the σ-field generated by the sample (Zj,h )1≤j≤n,1≤h≤d and by {ξ` }`∈N a sequence of i.i.d. standard
Gaussian random variables, which is independent of Zn . Now we consider a multiplier version of
the CUSUM-process from the L blocks, that is
(L)
Un,h (s)
L
L
`=1
`=1
1X b
bnsc X b
=
ξ` V`,h (bnsc) − 2
ξ` V`,h (n),
n
n
and introduce the bootstrap integral statistics (for each component)
√
Z 1
6 n
(L)
U
(s)k(s,
t̂
)ds
·
I
|∆b
µh | > n−1/4
Bn,h =
h
n,h
2
sbh τ (t̂h )(t̂h (1 − t̂h )) 0
+ I |∆b
µh | ≤ n−1/4 · bd ,
(5.7)
(5.8)
where k(x, y) = x ∧ y − xy denotes the covariance kernel of the standard Brownian bridge and
L
ŝ2h =
1X 2
ξ` · σ̂h
L
`=1
is the variance estimate from the bootstrap sample. In an analogous manner to the previous
sections, we define a normalized maximum of the bootstrap statistics Bn,h by
d
Bd,n = ad max Bn,h − bd ,
(5.9)
h=1
where the normalizing sequences ad and bd are given by (2.15) and (2.16), respectively.
Remark 5.1 Let us give a brief heuristic explanation, why (5.8) and (5.9) define an appropriate
bootstrap statistic. Our basic aim is to mimic the distribution of the test statistics Td,n on the “0dimensional boundary” of the null hypothesis H0,∆ , i.e. in case of |∆µh | = ∆h for all h = 1, . . . , d.
µh (s, th )
Note, that we have
= sign(∆µh )k(s, th ) and it was outlined in Section 3, that in this
∆h
setting the representation
√
Z 1
3 n
Tn,h =
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds,
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
√
Z 1
6 n
+
µh (s, th )(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))ds
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
holds, where by Lemma 3.6 the first summand on the right-hand side is of order oP (1). The
component-wise bootstrap statistic Bn,h is supposed to imitate the second summand in this decomposition. However, this approach is only sensible for all components h, that actually contain
a change and for this reason we introduce the indicator function I |∆b
µh | > n−1/4 . To be more
precise, we will show in the Appendix that
d
Bd,n = ad max Bn,h − bd ≈ ad maxc Bn,h − bd
h=1
h∈Sd
19
as d, n → ∞, where the set Sd is defined in (3.17). The statistic Bd,n will then be used to generate
bootstrap quantiles for the statistic Td,n . In order to prove that this is a valid approach we require
the following additional assumptions.
Assumption 5.2 (assumptions for the bootstrap) For the constants p, D in Assumption 3.2 and
the exponent ` in (5.1) assume that
(B1) D < min{(1 − `)(p/2 − 2), `(p/4 − 1)} with ` > 3/4 and p > 8,
(B2) limn→∞
log n
K(µ∗d )2
= 0,
where µ∗d is defined in (3.18).
Assumption (B1) is a rather technical condition relating the dimension d ∼ nD , the number of
blocks L = n` and the constant p, which was initially introduced in Assumption 3.1. Assumption
(B2) is only a restriction for the monotone decreasing sequence µ∗d = minh∈Sdc |∆µh |, that is not
allowed to decrease arbitrarily fast.
We are now ready to state the main results of this section. Our first lemma shows, that we are
able to identify the set of stable components Sd correctly.
Lemma 5.3 If Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 and Assumption 5.2 are satisfied, then
P
ad max Bn,h − bd −→ 0,
h∈Sd
where the set Sd is the set of all components with no change point defined in (3.17) and the sequences
ad and bd are defined in (2.15) and (2.16), respectively.
Theorem 5.4 If Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 and Assumption 5.2 are satisfied, then
G if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = 1,
D
ad maxc Bn,h − bd =⇒
G + 2 log c if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = c for c ∈ (0, 1),
h∈Sd
−∞ if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = 0
conditional on Zn in probability, where the sequences ad and bd are defined in (2.15) and (2.16),
respectively.
Finally, the representation
Bd,n
= max ad max Bn,h − bd , ad maxc Bn,h − bd
,
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
Lemma 5.3 and Theorem 5.4 directly yield the following main result of this section.
Theorem 5.5 If Assumptions 3.1 - 3.4 and Assumption 5.2 are satisfied, then
G if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = 1,
D
Bd,n =⇒
max{G + 2 log c, 0} if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = c for c ∈ (0, 1),
0 if limd→∞ |Sdc |/d = 0
conditional on Zn in probability.
20
(5.10)
∗
Remark 5.6
In the following let g1−α
denote the (1 − α)-quantile of the distribution of the
bootstrap statistic Bd,n and define the bootstrap test by rejecting the null hypothesis (2.4) in
favour of (2.5), whenever
∗
Td,n > g1−α
,
(5.11)
where the statistics Td,n is defined in (2.14). If the alternative hypothesis of at least one relevant
P
change point holds, Theorem 4.3 shows Td,n −→ ∞, which due to Theorem 5.5 directly yields
consistence of the bootstrap test. Under the null hypothesis, we consider different cases. Recall
the definition of the sets
Bd = {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | |∆µh | = ∆h },
Sd = {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | |∆µh | = 0},
where we always have Bd ⊂ Sdc ⊂ {1, . . . , d}. A combination of Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 5.5 now
shows, that the rule in (5.11) gives an asymptotic level α test, whenever the limit limd→∞ |Sdc |/d
exists.
6
Finite sample properties
In this section we examine the finite sample properties of the asymptotic and bootstrap test by
means of a small simulation study and illustrate its application in an example.
6.1
Simulation study
The results of the previous section demonstrate that a test which rejects the null hypothesis in
(1.3) for large values of the statistic Td,n defined in (2.14) is consistent and has asymptotic level α,
provided that the critical values are either chosen by the asymptotic theory or estimated by the
bootstrap procedure introduced in Section 5. It turns out that a bias correction, which does not
change the asymptotic properties, yields substantial improvements of the finite sample properties
of the asymptotic and bootstrap test. To be precise, recall the decomposition in (3.8), that is
(1)
(2)
Tn,h = Tn,h + Tn,h ,
(1)
(2)
where Tn,h and Tn,h are defined in (3.10) and (3.11), respectively. It is shown in Section 3, that the
(1)
(2)
maximum of the terms Tn,h is of order op (1), while the maximum of the terms Tn,h (appropriately
(1)
standardized) converges weakly to a Gumbel distribution. However, Tn,h is always nonnegative,
which may lead to a non negligible bias in applications, in particular when the sample size is small
relative to the dimension.
To solve this problem for the asymptotic test (2.19), note that we have
h
i
(1)
E Tn,h = √
3σh
n(th (1 − th ))2 τh |∆µh |
Z
0
1
σh (1 + o(1))
k(s, s)ds(1 + o(1)) = √
2 n(th (1 − th ))2 τh |∆µh |
21
and therefore we subtract the term
σ̂h
√
2 n(t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2 τ̂h ∆h
(∆)
from each statistic T̂n,h defined in (2.10). Similarly, a bias correction is also suggested for the
bootstrap test in Section 5. Recall that the Bootstrap statistic is already constructed to mimic the
(2)
distribution of the statistic Tn,h . Consequently we use
√
Z 1
2
3 n
(L)
ds
U
(s)
n,h
sbh τ̂h (t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2 ∆h 0
(1)
to mimic the distribution of Tn,h and we add it (for each h) to the statistic Bn,h defined in (5.8),
(∆)
while the statistics T̂n,h in (2.10) are left unchanged.
To guarantee a stable long-run variance estimation, we replaced the standard long-run variance
estimator used in the theory of Section 3.3, by an estimator using the Bartlett kernel [see Newey
and West (1987)], that is (for component h)
(
X
1 − |x| if |x| ≤ 1
j
φ̂h (0) +
k
φ̂h (j) with k(x) =
βn
0 if |x| > 1 .
1≤|j|≤βn
In order to have a more conservative test we use the maximum of the two variance estimates based
bh,1 and D
bh,2 defined in (3.20) as the final variance estimation.
on the sets D
We will focus on two scenarios with independent innovations in model (2.1), i.e.
(I) Xj,h ∼ N (0, 1) i.i.d.
(II) Xj,h ∼ Exp(1) i.i.d.
and on two models of dependent data, an ARMA-process and a MA-process, defined by
(III) Xj,h = 0.2Xj−1,h − 0.3Xj−2,h − 0.4Yj,h + 0.8Yj−1,h ,
P
−3
where Yk,h = εk + 19
i=1 i εk−i,h and εk,h ∼ N (0, 1) i.i.d.
(IV) Xj,h = εj,h +
1
10
29
P
k −3 εj−k,h , where εk,h ∼ N (0, 1) i.i.d.
k=1
All innovations are constructed such that Var(Xj,h ) ≈ 1. Throughout this section we assume that
different components are independent and we are interested in testing the relevant hypotheses
versus
H0,∆ : |∆µh | ≤ 1 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}
(6.1)
HA,∆ : |∆µh | > 1 for at least one h ∈ {1, . . . , d},
(6.2)
that is ∆h = 1 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}. Power and level of the tests are simulated for d-dimensional
vectors with means
0 if j ≤ bnt c
h
E[Zj,h ] =
, h = 1, . . . , d,
µ if j > bnth c
22
where different values of the parameter µ are considered and the time of change is th = 1/2. All
results presented in this section are based on 1000 simulation runs and the used significance level
is always α = 0.05. Further, the constant S involved in (3.20) was fixed to 0.9.
In our first example we investigate the finite sample properties of the asymptotic test (2.19) which
uses the quantiles of the Gumbel distribution. In Table 1 we display the simulated type I error
of this test at the “0-dimensional boundary” of the null hypothesis (that is ∆h = ∆µh = 1 for
all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}) for different values of n and d. It is well known that the approximation of the
distribution of the maximum of normally distributed random variables by a Gumbel distribution
is not very accurate for small samples and therefore we consider relatively large sample sizes and
dimensions in order to illustrate the properties of the asymptotic test. The results reflect the
asymptotic properties in Section 3. For the independent cases (I) and (II) the approximation of
the nominal level is more precise as for the dependent scenarios (III) and (IV), where the test is
more conservative. We also mention that the rejection probabilities are increasing with ∆µh as
predicted in Section 2 and 4 (these results are not presented for the sake of brevity).
n=2000
model
(I)
(II)
(III)
(IV)
d=500
8.8%
5.4%
4.9%
9.7%
d=1000
11.1 %
5.9 %
4.5 %
13 %
n=5000
d=500
6%
5%
1.9%
6.4%
d=1000
7.5%
5.5%
2.5%
5.2%
f
n=10000
d=500
6.4%
4%
2.5%
6.2%
d=1000
7.4%
5%
4%
5.9%
Table 1: Empirical rejection probabilities of the asymptotic test (2.19) under a specific point at the
“0-dimensional boundary” of null hypothesis, that is ∆h = ∆µh = 1 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}.
|∆µh |
model
(I)
(I)
(II)
(II)
(III)
(III)
(IV)
(IV)
K
1
4
1
4
5
10
2
4
0.9
0.95
1.0
1.05
1.1
2.2%
5.2%
0.6%
0.9%
0%
0.1%
3.3%
5%
4.2%
9.1%
0.9%
3.2%
0%
1.3%
5.9%
10.3%
8.2%
17.3%
2.5%
9.2%
0.6%
4.6%
10.9%
18.4%
14.7%
29.6%
7.8%
20.2%
3.2%
21.6%
21.5%
32.5%
26.9%
47.8%
17.3%
36.6%
13.7%
59.7%
35.8%
48.7%
Table 2: Empirical rejection probabilities of the bootstrap test (5.11) for n = d = 100 at specific
points in the alternative and null hypothesis (∆h = 1 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}). Different block length
K in the multiplier bootstrap are considered.
Next we analyse the properties of the bootstrap test (5.11), which was developed in Section
5. Here we focus on relatively small sample sizes, that is n = 100, n = 200 and a relative large
23
Figure 2: Simulated power of the Bootstrap test (5.11) for the hypothesis (6.1). The sample size is
n = 100 and the dimension d = 100. All differences are given by ∆µh = µ, where the choice µ = 1
corresponds to a point of the “0-dimensional boundary” Ad of the hull hypothesis. Left panel: Solid
line: Model (I), dashed line: Model (II). Right panel: Solid line Model (III), dashed line: Model
(IV).
dimension compared to the sample sizes, that is d = 50, d = 100. It is well known that the
multiplier bootstrap is sensitive with respect to the choice of the block length and this dependence
is also observed for the bootstrap test proposed here. Exemplarily we show in Table 2 the simulated
rejection probabilities for the different models (I) - (IV), different values of K and ∆µh = µ. Here
the values |∆µh | ≤ 1 correspond to the null hypothesis. For |∆µh | = 1 (for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}) the
results of Section 5 predict that at this point the level of the test should be close to α = 0.05. Note
that for the case of independent innovations (model (I) and (II)) the choice K = 1 (which means
that no blocks are used) leads to the most reasonable results, given by rejection probabilities on the
“0-dimensional boundary” Ad of the null hypothesis of 8.2% and 2.5%, respectively, while larger
values of K such as K = 4 yield a too large type I error. On the other hand in the dependent
models (III) and (IV), the block length needs to be carefully adapted to the time series structure.
For model (III) K = 10 seems to be optimal, while for model (IV) choosing K = 2 gives acceptable
results. The larger block length for model (III) might be required due to its autoregressive structure.
Moreover, inspecting the results in rows 6 and 8 of Table 2 shows that too small values of K lead to
a loss of power, while - similar to the first two models - too large values can cause an uncontrolled
type I error.
Next we display in Figure 2 the simulated power of the bootstrap test for all four models under
consideration (where we use the optimal K from Table 2). Note that the rejection probabilities are
increasing with ∆µh as predicted by the asymptotic arguments of the previous sections. In the left
24
panel we show the results for the independent scenarios (I) and (II), which are rather similar. On
the other hand an inspection of the right panel shows larger difference in the dependent case. The
different dependency structures in model (III) and (IV) yield substantial differences in power of the
bootstrap test (5.11). We conclude the discussion of the bootstrap test investigating the sample
size n = 200. The corresponding results are presented in Table 3 for the dimensions d = 50 and
d = 100.
|∆µh |
model
(I)
(II)
(III)
(IV)
K
1
1
20
2
0.9
0.95
d = 50
1.0
0.5%
0.3%
0%
0%
2.3%
1%
0.6%
0%
5.1%
4.1%
7.6%
9.5%
1.05
1.1
0.9
14.7%
11%
46.6%
47.56%
34.6%
30.4%
94.8%
100%
0.9%
0%
0%
0%
0.95
d = 100
1.0
1.05
1.1
2.3%
1.2%
0.3%
0%
6.9%
3.7%
6.4%
13.1%
18%
10.6%
51%
100%
40.7%
26.6%
95.3%
100%
Table 3: Empirical rejection probabilities of the bootstrap test (5.11) at specific points in the alternative and null hypothesis (∆h = 1 for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}). The sample sitze is n = 200.
6.2
Data example
In this section we illustrate in a short example, how the new test can be used in applications. Our
dataset is taken from hydrology and consists of average daily flows (m3 /sec) of the river Chemnitz
at Goeritzhain (Germany) in the period 1909-2014. This data set has been recently analysed by
Sharipov et al. (2016) using a statistical model from functional data analysis. Following these
authors we subdivide the data into n = 105 years with d = 365 days per year. To avoid confusion,
the reader should note that the German hydrological year starts on the 1st of November.
Equipped with our new methodology, we are now able to test if there is a relevant change in the
mean of at least one component. To specify the term ’relevant’, we exemplarily set the thresholds
for all components to
∆1 = ∆2 = · · · = ∆365 = 0.63,
which is close to 10% of the overall mean of the data under consideration. For a significance level
of 5% the Bootstrap test defined in Section 5 rejects the null hypothesis of no relevant change for
the given thresholds. Moreover, we can also identify the components, where the individual test
(∆)
∗
∗
statistic leads to a rejection, that is ad (T̂n,h − bd ) > g1−α
, where g1−α
is the (1 − α) quantile of the
bootstrap distribution used in (5.11). For the data under consideration we found four components
with a relevant change, given by h = 53, 99, 137 and 252 with corresponding estimators nt̂53 = 56,
nt̂99 = 70, nt̂137 = 47 and nt̂252 = 41, respectively. This corresponds to the 23th of December 1965,
the 7th of February 1979, the 18th of March 1956 and to the 10th of July 1950, respectively. In
Figure 3 we display for these cases the time series before and after the year. For example the panel
in the first row shows the average annual flow curves before and after 1950 and the other three
25
Figure 3: Average annual flow curves for the river Chemnitz at Goeritzhain for the periods before
(gray) and after (black) the estimated year of change. The four figures correspond to different days
of the year, where a change point has been localised: 10th of July (first row), 18 of March(second
row) 23th of December (third row) and 7th of February (fourth row).
26
years are interpreted separately. In all cases we observe a large difference between both curves close
the estimated component (marked by the vertical dashed line). We finally note that the approach
of Sharipov et al. (2016) identifies only one change point, namely the year 1965. In contrast our
analysis indicates that there might be additional change points in the years 1950, 1956, 1965 and
1979 corresponding to different parts of the hydrological year.
Acknowledgments. This work has been supported in part by the Collaborative Research Center
“Statistical modeling of nonlinear dynamic processes” (SFB 823, Teilprojekt A1, C1) of the German
Research Foundation (DFG). The authors would also like to thank Martina Stein, who typed
parts of this paper with considerable technical expertise and Moritz Jirak for extremely helpful
discussions. Moreover we are grateful to Andreas Schuhmann and Svenja Fischer from the Institute
of Hydrology in Bochum, who provided hydrological data for Section 6.2.
References
Aue, A. and Horváth, L. (2013). Structural breaks in time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis,
34(1):1–16.
Bai, J. (2010). Common breaks in means and variances for panel data. Journal of Econometrics,
157:78–92.
Berkson, J. (1938). Some difficulties of interpretation encountered in the application of the chisquare test. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33(203):526–536.
Berman, S. (1964). Limit theorems for the maximum term in stationary sequences. Annals of
Mathematical Statistics, 35(2):502–516.
Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., and Kato, K. (2013). Gaussian aproximations and multiplier
bootstrap for maxima of sums of high-dimensional random vectors. The Annals of Statistics,
41(6):2786–2819.
Cho, H. and Fryzlewicz, P. (2015). Multiple-change-point detection for high dimensional time series
via sparsified binary segmentation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 77:475–507.
Chu, C.-S. J., Stinchcombe, M., and White, H. (1996). Monitoring structural change. Econometrica,
64(5):1045–1065.
Dette, H. and Wied, D. (2016). Detecting relevant changes in time series models. Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 78:371–394.
Enikeeva, F. and Harchaoui, Z. (2014). High-dimensional change-point detection with sparse alternatives. arXiv:1312.1900v2.
Horváth, L. and Hus̆ková, M. (2012). Change-point detection in panel data. Journal of Time Series
Analysis, 33:631–648.
Horváth, L., Kokoszka, P., and Steinebach, J. (1999). Testing for changes in multivariate dependent
observations with an application to temperature changes. Journal of Multivariate Analysis,
68(1):96–119.
27
Jirak, M. (2015a). Uniform change point tests in high dimension. The Annals of Statistics,
43(6):2451–2483.
Jirak, M. (2015b). Uniform change point tests in high dimension (Supplement). DOI:10.1214/15AOS1347SUPP.
Kirch, C., Muhsal, B., and Ombao, H. (2015). Detection of changes in multivariate time series with
application to EEG data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511):1197–1216.
Künsch, H. R. (1989). The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann.
Statist., 17(3):1217–1241.
Lahiri, S. N. (2003). Resampling Methods for Dependent Data. Springer, New York.
Newey, W. and West, K. (1987). A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica, 55(3):703–08.
Page, E. S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41(1-2):100–115.
Page, E. S. (1955). Control charts with warning lines. Biometrika, 42(1-2):243–257.
Sharipov, O., Tewes, J., and Wendler, M. (2016). Sequential block bootstrap in a Hilbert space
with application to change point analysis. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 44(3):300–322.
Wang, T. and Samworth, R. J. (2016). High-dimensional changepoint estimation via sparse projection. arXiv:1606.06246v1.
Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority. CRC Press.
Wied, D. (2013). Cusum-type testing for changing parameters in a spatial autoregressive model
for stock returns. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 34(1):221–229.
Wu, W. B. (2005). Nonlinear system theory: Another look at dependence. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences USA, 102:14150–14154.
Zhang, N. R., Siegmund, D. O., Ji, H., and Li, J. Z. (2010). Detecting simultaneous changepoints
in multiple sequences. Biometrika, 97:631–645.
Zhang,
X.
and
Cheng,
G.
(2016).
Gaussian
approximation
for
high
dimensional
vector
under
physical
dependence.
http://www.epublications.org/ims/submission/BEJ/user/submissionFile/25290?confirm=e3e30249.
(Preprint).
7
Technical details
Throughout the proofs we will use that Assumption (C1) directly implies the existence of two
constants τ− , τ+ , such that the function τ defined in (2.11) satisfies
0 < τ− ≤ τ (th ) ≤ τ+ < ∞
holds for all h ∈ N.
28
7.1
Proof of assertion (2.7)
Straightforward calculations yield
E [Un,h (s)] = µh (s, th ) + O(n−1 )∆µh
n Var (Un,h (s)) = σh2 (s − s2 ) + o(1),
(7.1)
uniformly with respect to s ∈ [0, 1], where µh (s, th ) is defined in (3.9). An application of Fubini’s
theorem now gives
i Z 1
hZ 1
2
E U2n,h (s) ds
Un,h (s)ds =
E
0
0
Z 1
=
E (Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 + 2µh (s, th )E [Un,h (s)] − µ2h (s, th ) ds + o(1)
0
Z 1
σh2
(th (1 − th ))2
=
µ2h (s, th )ds + o(1) = ∆µh
+
+ o(1).
6n
3
0
7.2
7.2.1
Details in the proof of Theorem 3.5
Proof of Lemma 3.6
Observing the definition (2.11) and Assumptions (T2) and (C1) it easily follows that there exist
constants c and C such that the inequalties
c < (th (1 − th ))2 σh < C
(7.2)
hold for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d}. With these inequalities we obtain
√
Z 1
3 n
d
d
(1)
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds
0 ≤ ad max Tn,h = ad max
h=1
h=1 (th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
Z 1
d √
. ad max n
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds
h=1
0
√
ad d
≤ √ max sup ( n|Un,h (s) − µh (s, th )|)2 .
n h=1 s∈[0,1]
Using (7.1) and maxdh=1 |∆µh | ≤ Cu this is further bounded by
2
√
ad d
2 √ max sup n|Un,h (s) − E [Un,h (s)] | + o(1)
n h=1 s∈[0,1]
√
Introducing the notation ed = 2 2 log 2d it follows that the last term can be bounded by the
random variable
√
ad d
e d 2
4 √ max sup n|Un,h (s) − E [Un,h (s)] | −
+ o(1)
4
n h=1 s∈[0,1]
and the claim follows from Theorem 2.5 in (Jirak, 2015a) noting that {Un,h (s) − E [Un,h (s)]}s∈[0,1]
corresponds to a CUSUM-process under the classical null hypothesis of no change point, that is
(1)
(2)
µh = µh for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d} (note that there is a typo in the original paper, which has been
corrected in the arXiv version).
29
7.2.2
Proof of Lemma 3.7
A straightforward calculation yields
n Cov(Un,h (s1 ), Un,i (s2 )) = k(s1 , s2 )γh,i + rn,h,i (s1 , s2 ),
where k(s1 , s2 ) = s1 ∧s2 −s1 s2 denotes the covariance kernel of a Brownian bridge and the remainder
term satisfies
√
lim n sup sup |rn,h,i (s1 , s2 )| = 0.
n→∞
s1 ,s2 ∈[0,1] h,i∈N
An application of Fubini’s theorem shows that
sign(∆µ ) sign(∆µ )γ τe(t , t )
i h,i
h
h i
(2)
(2)
Cov T̄n,h , T̄n,i =
+ rn,h,i ,
σh σi τ (th )τ (ti )
(7.3)
where the function τe is given by
36
τe(t, t ) =
(t(1 − t)t0 (1 − t0 ))2
0
Z
1Z 1
0
k(s1 , t)k(s2 , t0 )k(s1 , s2 )ds1 ds2
(7.4)
0
and the remainder term rn,h,i satisfies
lim
n→∞
√
n sup |rn,h,i | = 0.
h,i∈N
Moreover, for the function τ defined in (2.11) we obtain the representation
s
Z 1Z 1
6
τ (t) =
k(s1 , t)k(s2 , t)k(s1 , s2 )ds1 ds2 ,
(t(1 − t))2
0
0
and it follows that τ (th )τ (th ) = τe(th , th ). Therefore we obtain as a special case the estimate
(2)
Var T̄n,h = 1 + rn,h,h .
(7.5)
Furthermore the representation
bnsc
n
1X
bnsc X
Un,h (s) − E [Un,h (s)] =
Xj,h =: U0n,h (s)
Xj,h − 2
n
n
j=1
j=1
yields
(2)
T̄n,h
√
Z 1
6 n
=
µh (s, th )U0n,h (s)ds.
(th (1 − th ))2 τh σh |∆µh | 0
and the proof can now be performed in two steps:
Step 1: For two constants c, C > 0 it holds that
d
d
(2)
e
≤ Cn−c ,
sup P max T̄n,h ≤ x − P max Nh ≤ x
x∈R
h=1
h=1
(7.6)
e is a d-dimensional centered Gaussian distributed random variable with same
where N
(2)
(2)
covariance structure as (T̄n,1 , . . . , T̄n,d )T .
30
Step 2: There exist two constants c, C > 0 such that
d
d
e
sup P max Nh ≤ x − P max Nh ≤ x
≤ Cn−c ,
h=1
x∈R
h=1
(7.7)
where N is a centered d-dimensional Gaussian random variable with covariance matrix
Σ = (Σh,i )i,j=1,...,d satisfying
|Σh,i | ≤ |ρh,i |
(7.8)
for all h, i ∈ {1, . . . , d}.
Step 1: At the end of this proof we derive the following representation
n
1 X
(2)
cn,j,h Xj,h ,
T̄n,h = √
n
(7.9)
j=1
where the coefficients cn,j,h are uniformly bounded, that is
sup |cn,j,h | ≤ c0 < ∞
n,j,h∈N
Next we apply the Gaussian approximation in Corollary 2.2 of Zhang and Cheng (2016) to the
random variables Yn,j,h = cn,j,h Xj,h . For this purpose we check the assumptions of this result. By
Assumption (M1) we obtain a sequence (Md0 )d∈N by Md0 = c0 · Md , which still satisfies
n
d
n
d
max max E exp(|Yn,j,h |/Md0 ) ≤ max max E [exp(|Xj,h |/Md )] ≤ C0 .
j=1 h=1
j=1 h=1
Moreover, Assumption (M2) yields that Md0 . nm with m < 3/8. This means that for sufficiently
small b we have m < (3 − 17b)/8 and by Assumption (S1) it follows that d . exp(nb ). Using the
identity (3.1) the triangular array {Yn,j,h | 1 ≤ j ≤ n, 1 ≤ h ≤ d}n∈N exhibits the following structure
Yn,j,h = cn,j,h · gh (εj , εj−1 , . . . ) := g̃n,j,h (εj , εj−1 , . . . ).
Define the coefficients
n
ϑYn,j,h,p = max kg̃n,i,h (εi , . . . ) − g̃n,i,h (εi , , . . . , εi−j+1 , ε0i−j , εi−j−1 , . . . )kp ,
i=1
where ε0i−j is an independent copy of εi−j , and observe the inequality
∞
X
j=u
d
max ϑYn,j,h,p
h=1
≤
∞
X
d
n
max sup max |cn,i,h |ϑj,h,p . c0
h=1 n∈N i=1
j=u
∞
X
δj . δu,
j=u
which holds uniformly with respect to n. By (7.5) there exist constants c1 and c2 , such that
d
d
(2)
(2)
0 < c1 < min Var T̄n,h ≤ max Var T̄n,h < c2
h=1
h=1
31
if n is sufficiently large. Since all requirements are met, Corollary 2.2 of Zhang and Cheng (2016)
e having the same covariance matrix as the
implies the existence of a Gaussian random variable N
(2)
(2) T
vector (T̄n,1 , . . . , T̄n,d ) and satisfying inequality (7.6).
Step 2: We choose the random variable N to be d-dimensional centered Gaussian with covariance
matrix given by
Σh,i =
sign(∆µh ) sign(∆µi )γh,i τe(th , ti )
τe(th , ti )
= sign(∆µh ) sign(∆µi )ρh,i
,
σh σi τ (th )τ (ti )
τ (th )τ (ti )
e the covariance matrix of the
where the function τe is defined in equation (7.4). Next denote with Σ
e from Step 1. By (7.3) we have
vector N
d
d
h,i=1
h,i=1
e h,i | = max
θd := max |Σh,i − Σ
sign(∆µh ) sign(∆µi )γh,i τe(th , ti )
(2)
(2)
− Cov(Tn,h , Tn,i ) . n−1/2
σh σi τ (th )τ (ti )
and an application of the Gaussian comparison inequality, in Lemma 3.1 of Chernozhukov et al.
(2013) gives
d
d
eh ≤ x . θ1/3 max{1, log(d/θd )}2/3 . n−C .
sup P max Nh ≤ x − P max N
d
x∈R
h=1
h=1
The proof of Step 2 is now completed observing the bound |e
τ (th , ti )| ≤ |τ (ti )||τ (th )|, which is a
consequence of the (generalised) Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.
Proof of the representation (7.9). Recall the definition k(s, t) = s ∧ t − st, then
1
Z
0
n−1 Z (i+1)/n
1X
k(s, th )Un,h (s)ds =
n
i=0
=
1
n
i/n
n
bnsc
X
bnsc X
k(s, th )
Xj,h ds
Xj,h −
n
j=1
n−1
n
X Z (i+1)/n X
i=0
i/n
j=1
k(s, th ) (I{j ≤ i} − i/n) Xj,h ds
j=1
!
n
n−1 Z
1 X X (i+1)/n
k(s, th ) (I{j ≤ i} − i/n) ds Xj,h .
=
n
i/n
j=1
i=0
(2)
Now observe the representation for T̄n,h in (3.12), where µh (s, t) = 2∆µh k(s, t). Define
n−1 Z (i+1)/n
cn,j,h
X
6∆µh
:=
(th (1 − th ))2 τ (th )σh |∆µh |
i=0
k(s, t) (I{j ≤ i} − i/n) ds,
i/n
then the representation (7.9) holds, and the proof is completed observing the inequalities
n−1
X Z (i+1)/n
6
12
|cn,j,h | ≤
2ds ≤ c0 :=
.
4
τ− σ− t i=0 i/n
τ− σ− t4
32
7.2.3
Proof of Theorem 3.10
As |∆µh | > Cu for all h ∈ {1, . . . , d} we have Sd = ∅ and Sdc = {1, . . . , d}, and Lemma 3.8 implies
d
max |t̂h − th | = op (n−1/2 )
(7.10)
h=1
Observing that t̂h ∈ [t, 1 − t] it follows that
t2h (1 − th )2
− 1 = op (n−1/2 )
2
2
t̂h (1 − t̂h )
d
max
h=1
(7.11)
Moreover, one easily verifies that the function t → τ (t) defined in (2.11) is Lipschitz-continuous on
the interval [t, 1 − t] and therefore we obtain from (7.10)
d
max |τ (th ) − τ (t̂h )| = op (n−1/2 ).
(7.12)
h=1
Finally, we note that for a sufficiently small constant C > 0 the estimate
d
max |σ̂h τ (t̂h ) − σh τ (t̂h )| = op (n−C )
(7.13)
h=1
holds, which is a direct consequence Lemma 3.9 and assertion (7.12).
After these preparations we return to the proof of Theorem 3.10. We recall the definition (2.8)
and introduce the notation
√
n
0
T̂n,h =
M̂2n,h − ∆µ2h
τ (th )σh |∆µh |
We will first show the weak convergence
D
d
0
ad max T̂n,h
− bd =⇒ G
(7.14)
h=1
For a proof of (7.14) we recall the definition of the statistic Tn,h in (3.7) and obtain from Theorem
3.5
D
d
ad max Tn,h − bd =⇒ G.
h=1
With the representation for M̂2n,h and M2n,h in (2.8) and (3.6), respectively, and the notation q̂h =
(th (1 − th ))2 /(t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2 it now follows that
√
√
n(q̂h − 1)∆µ2h
n
d
d
2
2
0
Mn,h − ∆µh − bd +
= Bn,d
ad max T̂n,h − bd = ad max q̂h
h=1
h=1
τ (th )σh |∆µh |
τ (th )σh |∆µh |
where
√
d
Bn,d := ad max q̂h Tn,h − bd + (q̂h −
h=1
1)∆µ2h
n
.
τ (th )σh |∆µh |
It is easy to see that this term can be bounded by
d
d
ad max q̂h Tn,h − bd − Rn,d ≤ Bn,d ≤ ad max q̂h Tn,h − bd + Rn,d ,
h=1
h=1
33
where the remainder satisfies
d
d
h=1
h=1
Rn,d = ad max |q̂h − 1| max
√
n
P
∆µ2h −→ 0,
τ (th )σh |∆µh |
which follows observing the inequalities (7.2), (7.11) and the condition C` ≤ |∆µh | ≤ Cu .
Thus (7.14) follows, if we can establish
D
d
ad max q̂h Tn,h − bd =⇒ G.
(7.15)
h=1
For a proof of this result we fix x ∈ R and define ud (x) = x/ad + bd . By
d
d
d
P 0 ≤ max q̂h max Tn,h ≤ ud (x) ≤ P 0 ≤ max q̂h Tn,h ≤ ud (x)
h=1
h=1
h=1
d
d
h=1
h=1
≤ P 0 ≤ min q̂h max Tn,h
≤ ud (x) .
(7.16)
and
d
d
d
d
d
P min q̂h max Tn,h ≥ 0 = P max q̂h Tn,h ≥ 0 = P max q̂h max Tn,h ≥ 0 ,
h=1
h=1
h=1
h=1
h=1
we obtain
d
d
d
d
d
P max q̂h max Tn,h ≤ ud (x) ≤ P max q̂h Tn,h ≤ ud (x) ≤ P min q̂h max Tn,h ≤ ud (x) .
h=1
h=1
h=1
h=1
h=1
(7.17)
From (7.11) and d = C1 nD it follows that
d
P
P
d
ad bd min q̂h − 1 −→ 0 and ad bd max q̂h − 1 −→ 0,
h=1
h=1
which due to Slutsky’s theorem directly implies
d
d
−x
−x
d
d
P min q̂h max Tn,h ≤ ud (x) −→ e−e , P max q̂h max Tn,h ≤ ud (x) −→ e−e .
h=1
h=1
n→∞
h=1
h=1
n→∞
Thus we have established (7.15) and proved (7.14).
To complete the proof of Theorem 3.10 note that the assertion (3.22) is equivalent to
d
−x
P max T̂n,h ≤ ud (x) −→ e−e ,
n→∞
h=1
(7.18)
where we use again ud (x) = x/ad + bd . To prove this statement define
d
Q−
d := min
h=1
σ̂h τ̂h
σ̂h τ̂h
d
, Q+
,
d := max
h=1 σh τ (th )
σh τ (th )
−
and consider the set Qd := Q+
d − 1 ∨ Qd − 1 ≤ δd , where the involved sequence is given by
δd = (log d)−2 . The inequalities (7.2) and the estimate (7.13) yield
d
d
σ̂h τ̂h
P Q+
−
1
>
δ
≤
P
max
σ̂
τ̂
−
σ
τ
(t
)
>
δ
c
= o(1).
−
1
>
δ
=
P
max
d
d
h
h
h
h
d
d
h=1 σh τ (th )
h=1
34
c
d
By a similar argument for the term Q−
d − 1 we obtain P (Qd ) → 0. If maxh=1 T̂n,h ≥ 0 holds, we
can conclude that
√
n
1 d
1 d
0
2
2
max
T̂
=
max
M̂
−
∆µ
n,h
n,h
h
h=1
h=1 τ (th )σh |∆µh |
Q+
Q+
d
d
√
n
1 d
d
0
≤ max
M̂2n,h − ∆µ2h = T̂n,h = − max T̂n,h
.
h=1 τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
Qd h=1
Therefore the following inequalities hold
d
d
d
+
0
0
P 0 ≤ max T̂n,h
≤ ud (x)Q−
≤
P
0
≤
max
T̂
≤
u
(x)
≤
P
0
≤
max
T̂
≤
u
(x)Q
n,h
d
d
n,h
d
d . (7.19)
h=1
h=1
h=1
Observing the identity
d
d
0
P max T̂n,h
≥ 0 = P ∃h : M̂2n,h ≥ ∆µ2h = P max T̂n,h ≥ 0
h=1
h=1
we can derive from (7.19)
d
d
d
+
0
0
≤
P
P max T̂n,h
≤ ud (x)Q−
max
T̂
≤
u
(x)
≤
P
≤
u
(x)Q
max
T̂
n,h
d
d
n,h
d
d .
h=1
h=1
h=1
(7.20)
Hence, we directly obtain
d
d
+
+
c
0
0
P max T̂n,h ≤ ud (x)Qd ≤ P(Qd ) + P max T̂n,h ≤ ud (x)Qd ∩ Qd
h=1
h=1
d
0
≤ ud (x) + ud (x)δd .
≤ o(1) + P max T̂n,h
h=1
Now we fix ε > 0 and note that the inequality ud (x − ε) < ud (x) + ud (x)δd < ud (x + ε) holds if n
(or equivalently d) is sufficiently large. The weak convergence (7.14) then yields
d
d
−(x+ε )
0
0
≤
lim
sup
P
≤
u
(x
+
ε)
= e−e
.
lim sup P max T̂n,h
≤ ud (x)Q+
max
T̂
d
n,h
d
d,n→∞
h=1
d,n→∞
h=1
Using Bonferroni’s inequality we can proceed similarly for the lower bound of (7.20), i.e.
d
d
−
−
0
0
lim inf P max T̂n,h ≤ ud (x)Qd ≥ lim inf P max T̂n,h ≤ ud (x)Qd ∩ Qd
d,n→∞
d,n→∞
h=1
h=1
d
0
≥ lim inf P max T̂n,h
≤ ud (x) − ud (x)δd − P (Qcd )
d,n→∞
h=1
d
−(x−ε )
0
≥ lim inf P max T̂n,h
≤ ud (x − ε) = e−e
.
d,n→∞
h=1
The assertion (7.18) then follows by ε → 0, which completes the proof of Theorem 3.10.
7.2.4
Proof of Corollary 3.11
At first we consider the case where md := |Md | = c · d + o(d) for some constant c ∈ (0, 1] and note
that in this case
ad
ad max T̂n,h − bd =
am max T̂n,h − amd bmd + amd bmd − ad bd .
h∈Md
amd d h∈Md
35
D
Theorem 3.10 yields amd maxh∈Md T̂n,h − amd bmd =⇒ G and furthermore we have
ad
−→ 1 and amd bmd − ad bd −→ 2 log(c)
d→∞
amd d→∞
D
A short calculation therefore leads to ad maxh∈Md T̂n,h − bd =⇒ G + 2 log(c). The case md = o(d)
can be treated similarly. Finally, statement (3.23) is a consequence of the inequality
d
max T̂n,h ≤ max T̂n,h .
h=1
h∈Md
7.3
7.3.1
Proofs of the results in Section 4
Proof of Theorem 4.1
By Assumption (C1) and the definition of t̂h in (3.16), there exists a global constant C(t) > 1 such
that
(th (1 − th ))2
≤ C(t).
(t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2
(7.21)
Recall the definition of the set Sd in (3.17) , choose a constant ∆2− > ζ > 0 and consider the
following decomposition of the set {1, . . . , d} \ Sd
p
Id := {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | (∆h − ζ)/ C(t) ≥ |∆µh | > 0},
p
(7.22)
Ed := {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | ∆h ≥ |∆µh | > (∆h − ζ)/ C(t)}.
Using the representation
o
n
(∆)
(∆)
(∆)
Td,n = max ad max T̂n,h − bd , ad max T̂n,h − bd , ad max T̂n,h − bd .
h∈Id
h∈Sd
h∈Ed
the first assertion (4.2) follows from the following three statements
P
(∆)
ad max T̂n,h − bd −→ −∞,
h∈Sd
P
(∆)
ad max T̂n,h − bd −→ −∞,
h∈Id
(∆)
lim P ad max T̂n,h − bd ≥ g1−α ≤ α.
d,n→∞
h∈Ed
(7.23)
(7.24)
(7.25)
(∆)
Proof of (7.23): Observing the definition of T̂n,h in (2.10) we obtain the inequality
√
ad
(∆)
max T̂n,h
h∈S
d
− bd
√
n
n
2
≤ ad max
M̂n,h − ad min
∆2h − ad bd .
h∈Sd τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
h∈Sd τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
The first summand of this expression is further bounded by
√
√
n
ad max
M̂2n,h . ad max n · M2n,h ,
h∈Sd τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
h∈Sd
36
(7.26)
(7.27)
and arguing as in the proof of Lemma 3.6 yields ad maxh∈Sd
√
√
summand of (7.26) we can use
n
∆2
τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h h
P
n · M2n,h −→ 0. For the second
> 0 and ad bd ∼ log d to obtain
√
ad min
h∈Sd
n
∆2h + ad bd −→ ∞,
d,n→∞
τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
which yields (7.23).
Proof of (7.24): By definition of the set Id , we get ∆2h ≥ C(t)∆µ2h + ζ, which leads to
√
√
n
n
(∆)
2
2
ad max T̂n,h − bd ≤ ad max
ζ.
M̂n,h − C(t)∆µh − bd − ad min
h∈Id
h∈Id τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
h∈Id τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
(7.28)
For the second summand of the last expression it holds that
√
√
ad n
ζ
&
−→ ∞,
ad n min
h∈Id τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
τ+ s+ ∆+ n→∞
(7.29)
From inequality (7.21), we obtain M̂2n,h ≤ C(t)M2n,h , which gives the following bound for the first
summand of (7.28)
√
√
n
n
2
2
ad max
M̂n,h − C(t)∆µh − bd . ad max
M2n,h − ∆µ2h − bd . (7.30)
h∈Id τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
h∈Id τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
Similar to (3.8) we can use the following decomposition
√
n
(1)
(2)
M2n,h − ∆µ2h = Sn,h + Sn,h ,
τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
(1)
(2)
where the quantities Sn,h and Sn,h are given by
(1)
Sn,h
(2)
Sn,h
√
Z 1
3 n
= 2
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds,
2
th (1 − th ) τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h 0
√
Z 1
6 n
= 2
µh (s, th )(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))ds,
th (1 − th )2 τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h 0
respectively. Now we have an upper bound for (7.30) given by
(1)
(2)
ad max Sn,h + ad max Sn,h − bd .
h∈Id
h∈Id
(1)
(2)
Similar as in the proof of (7.23) one easily shows that ad max Sn,h = op (1). In the case that Sn,h ≥ 0
h∈Id
we have
(2)
Sn,h
.
(3)
Sn,h
√
Z 1
6 n
:= 2
µh (s, th )(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))ds,
th (1 − th )2 τ (th )σh |∆µh | 0
37
which gives
n
o
n
o
(2)
(3)
(3)
ad max Sn,h − bd . ad max max Sn,h , 0 − bd ≤ max ad max Sn,h − bd , −ad bd .
h∈Id
h∈Id
h∈Id
Applying Lemma 3.7 yields
(3)
lim sup P ad max Sn,h − bd > x ≤ P (G > x)
h∈Id
d,n→∞
for all x ∈ R and consequently the right hand side of (7.30) is of order Op (1). Now (7.24) follows
from (7.28) and (7.29).
Proof of (7.25): Observing that dh := ∆2h − ∆µ2h ≥ 0 we obtain
√
n
(∆)
ad max T̂n,h − bd ≤ ad max
M̂2n,h − ∆µ2h − bd ,
(7.31)
h∈Ed
h∈Ed τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
1
)) ≥ 0,
As α ∈ 0, 1 − e−1 the quantile of the Gumbel distribution satisfies g1−α = − log(log( 1−α
and we can proceed as follows
|∆µh |
(∆)
P ad max T̂n,h − bd > g1−α ≤ P max
· ad max T̂n,h − bd > g1−α
h∈Ed ∆h
h∈Ed
h∈Ed
≤ P ad max T̂n,h − bd > g1−α .
h∈Ed
An application of Corollary 3.11 now yields
lim sup P ad max T̂n,h − bd > g1−α ≤ P (G > g1−α ) = α,
d,n→∞
h∈Ed
which gives assertion (7.25) and completes the proof of assertion (4.2).
It remains to show assertion (4.4) under the additional assumption of (4.3). Note that under the
latter assumption, we can further decompose the set Ed into Ed = (Ed \ Bd ) ∪ Bd and observe that
(4.3) yields
p
Ed \ Bd = {h ∈ {1, . . . , d} | ∆h − C∆ ≥ |∆µh | > (∆h − ζ)/ C(t)}.
Again, we can examine both sets separately. For Ed \ Bd we have
(∆)
ad
max T̂n,h − bd ≤ ad
max T̂n,h − bd − ad min
h∈Ed \Bd
h∈Ed \Bd
h∈Ed \Bd
√
n
.
τ (t̂h )σ̂h ∆h
(7.32)
By definition of Ed \ Bd we obtain that the second summand on the right-hand side of (7.32) tends
p
(in probability) to −∞. Due to the lower bound minh∈Ed \Bd |∆µh | > (∆− − ζ)/ C(t), which holds
uniformly in d, we can apply Corollary 3.11 to the first summand of the right-hand side of (7.32),
which then gives
P
(∆)
ad
max T̂n,h − bd −→ −∞.
h∈Ed \Bd
On the set Bd = Ed we can directly apply Corollary 3.11, so that we obtain (4.4).
38
7.3.2
Proof of Theorem 4.3
It follows from Theorem 3 of Wu (2005) that
n 1 bnsc
o
X
D
√
=⇒ {σh Ws }s∈[0,1] ,
Zj,h − E [Zj,h ]
n
s∈[0,1]
(7.33)
j=1
where {Ws }s∈[0,1] denotes the (standard) Brownian motion on the interval [0, 1]. The definition of
µh (s, th ) in (3.9), E [Un,h (s)] = µh (s, th )(1 + o(1)) (uniformly with respect to s ∈ [0, 1]) and the
continuous mapping theorem yield
√
D
n(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th )) s∈[0,1] =⇒ {σh Bs }s∈[0,1] ,
(7.34)
where {Bs }s∈[0,1] denotes a (standard) Brownian bridge. Observing (3.8) we get
√
Z 1
√
3 n
2
2
(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))2 ds
n Mn,h − ∆µh =
(th (1 − th ))2 0
√
Z 1
6 n
+
µh (s, th )(Un,h (s) − µh (s, th ))ds.
(th (1 − th ))2 0
Statement (7.34) and the continuous mapping theorem imply
Z 1
D
√
6
2
2
n Mn,h − ∆µh =⇒
µh (s, th )σh B(s)ds.
(th (1 − th ))2 0
It is well known, that the expression on the right-hand side follows a centered normal distribution
and a straightforward calculation shows that its variance is given by ∆µ2h τ 2 (th )σh2 . Replacing σh
and th by the estimators σ̂h and t̂h we obtain from Lemmas 3.8 and 3.9 the weak convergence
√
n 2
D
(7.35)
M̂n,h − ∆µ2h =⇒ N (0, ∆µ2h ) ,
τ (t̂h )σ̂h
for each (fixed) h ∈ N provided that |∆µh | > 0. After these preparations we are ready to prove the
consistency of the test (2.19). If the alternative hypothesis HA,∆ is valid, we can fix k ∈ {1, . . . , d},
such that dk := ∆µ2k − ∆2k > 0. From the definition of the test statistic Td,n in (2.14) we obtain
√
√
n
n
(∆)
2
2
Td,n ≥ ad T̂n,k − bd = ad
M̂k − ∆µk +
dk − bd ,
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
which gives
√
√
g
n
n
1−α
2
2
P (Td,n
M̂k − ∆µk >
+ bd −
dk .
ad
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
√
√
Using bd ∼ log d and τ (t̂ )σn ∆ & n leads to
k k k
√
g1−α
n
P
+ bd −
dk −→ −∞.
ad
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
> g1−α ) ≥ P
On the other hand we obtain from (7.35)
√
n
D |∆µk |
M̂2k − ∆µ2k =⇒
· N (0, 1) ,
∆k
τ (t̂k )σk ∆k
and the assertion of Theorem 4.3 follows.
39
(7.36)
(7.37)
7.3.3
Proof of Theorem 4.4
Due to g1−α /ad + bd > 0 we deduce
b d (α)) = P min T̂ (∆) > g1−α /ad + bd
P(Rd ⊂ R
h∈Rd n,h
√
n
≥ P min
M̂2n,h − ∆2h > g1−α /ad + bd .
h∈Rd τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
Using the notation dh = ∆µ2h − ∆2h we get
√
√
n
n
2
2
b
M̂n,h − ∆µh > g1−α /ad + bd − min dh
P(Rd ⊂ Rd (α)) > P min
h∈Rd
h∈Rd τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
√
n
= P min T̂n,h > g1−α /ad + bd − min dh
h∈Rd
h∈Rd
τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
√
n
= P ad min T̂n,h + bd ≥ g1−α + 2ad bd − ad min dh
h∈Rd
h∈Rd
τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh |
By assumption (4.7) we have
nC min dh ≥ nC min (|∆µh | − ∆h ) ∆− −→ ∞,
h∈Rd
n→∞
h∈Rd
which implies (as 1 . τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh | . 1)
√
ad bd − ad min dh
h∈Rd
n
−→ −∞.
τ (t̂h )σ̂h |∆µh | d,n→∞
By arguments similar to those in the proofs of Section 3 one can show that for all x ∈ R
lim inf P ad min T̂n,h + bd ≥ x ≥ P (−G ≥ x) ,
d,n→∞
h∈Rd
which yields assertion (4.8). For a proof of (4.9) we apply Bonferroni’s inequality, which gives
b d (α) = Rd = P R
b d (α) ⊂ Rd , Rd ⊂ R
b d (α) ≥ 1 − P R
b d (α) * Rd − P Rd * R
b d (α) .
P R
b d (α) = o(1) and Theorem 4.1
By the arguments in the previous paragraph we have P Rd * R
gives
(∆)
b
lim sup P Rd (α) * Rd = lim sup P maxc T̂n,h > g1−α /ad + bd ≤ α,
d,n→∞
h∈Rd
d,n→∞
which finishes the proof.
7.4
Proofs of the results in Section 5
To establish the bootstrap results, we recall the definition of the set Sd in (3.17) and we introduce
the set
n
o
b− , K L
b+ ) ,
Ld = ∀ h ∈ Sdc : nth ∈ (K L
(7.38)
h
h
which represents the event, that the locations of all change points are identified correctly. We need
the following basic properties.
40
Lemma 7.1 If the assumptions of Section 3.1 and Assumption 5.2 hold, then
d
P
(i) nC max |∆b
µh − ∆µh | −→ 0 if C < 1/2,
h=1
(ii) P (Lcd ) . nC for a sufficiently small constant C > 0.
Proof. For assertion (i) fix ε > 0 and observe
b−
d
P nC max |∆b
µh − ∆µh | > ε ≤ P nC max
d
h=1
h=1
KL
1 Xh
Z
−
µ
>
ε/2
∩
L
j,h
h,1
d
b−
KL
h j=1
d
1
n
X
h=1
b+ )
K(L − L
h
b h +1
j=K L
+ P nC max
Zj,h − µh,2 > ε/2 ∩ Ld + o(1).
(7.39)
The first two summands of the right-hand side of (7.39) exhibit the same structure, so we only
treat the first of them. Note that on the event Ld , it holds that
b − }.
b − } = Xj,h I{j ≤ K L
(Zj,h − µh,1 ) I{j ≤ K L
h
h
b − ≤ nt̂h
Further there exists a constant 0 < C0 < 1, such that the inequalities C0 n ≤ nt − K ≤ K L
h
hold. This implies
−
−
b
b
KL
L
d
h
X
1 KX
Xh
1
−C
Z
−
µ
>
ε/2
∩
L
≤
P
X
>
n
ε/2
P nC max
j,h
h,1
d
j,h
b−
b−
h=1 K L
KL
h j=1
h j=1
h=1
d
d
k
n X
X
≤
P max
Xj,h > C0 n1−C ε/2 .
h=1
k=1
j=1
Since 1 − C > 1/2 we obtain by the Fuk-Nagaev inequality (see Lemma E.3 in Jirak (2015b)) for
sufficiently large n
d
k
n X
X
P max
Xj,h > C0 n1−C ε/2 . nD
h=1
k=1
j=1
n
n(1−C)p
= nD+(C−1)p+1 ≤ nD−p/2+1 = o(1),
where we also used D ≤ p/2 − 2. Assertion (ii) is shown in the proof of Theorem C.12 in Jirak
(2015b).
Proof of Lemma 5.3. This is a consequence of Lemma 7.1 (i) and the inequality (for any ε > 0)
P ad max Bn,h − bd > ε ≤ P max |∆b
µh | > n−1/4 .
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
41
7.4.1
Proof of Theorem 5.4
For the proof we introduce the following more simple version of the bootstrap CUSUM-process
(L)
{Un,h (s)}s∈[0,1] introduced in (5.7)
bLsc
L
X
bLsc X b
e (L) (s) := 1
b
U
ξ
V
−
ξ` V`,h ,
` `,h
n,h
n
Ln
`=1
`=1
where the truncation is not conducted within the blocks. We make also use of the following extra
notation
√
Z 1
6 n
e (L) (s)k(s, th )ds
e =
U
B
n,h
σh τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2 0 n,h
√
Z 1
6 n
∗
e (L) (s)k(s, t̂h )ds
e
U
Bn,h =
σh τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2 0 n,h
√
Z 1
6 n
(L)
∗
Bn,h =
Un,h (s)k(s, t̂h )ds
2
σh τ (th )(th (1 − th )) 0
√
Z 1
6 n
(L)
(I)
Un,h (s)k(s, t̂h )ds.
Bn,h =
2
sbh τ (t̂h )(t̂h (1 − t̂h )) 0
The theorem’s claim is a direct consequence of the next five lemmas. We will use the notation
P|Zn (·) = P (·|Zn ). and frequently apply that the implication P (An ) = o(1) ⇒ P|Zn (An ) = op (1)
holds for all sequences of measurable sets {An }n∈N .
Lemma 7.2 The weak convergence
D
e
ad maxc Bn,h − bd =⇒
h∈Sd
G if Sdc = {1, . . . , d},
G + 2 log c if |Sdc | = c · d + o(d) for c ∈ (0, 1),
0 if |Sdc | = o(d)
holds conditionally on Zn .
Proof. Without loss of generality assume that the sets Sd and Sdc are given by
Sdc = {1, . . . , s} and Sd = {s + 1, . . . , d}
with s = |Sdc |. Let N = (N1 , . . . , Ns )T denote a centered s-dimensional Gaussian vector with
covariance matrix Σ = (Σij )di,j=1 defined by
Σi,j =
γi,j τe(ti , tj )
,
σi σj τ (ti )τ (tj )
where the function τe is defined in (7.4). Our aim is to control the (conditional) Kolmogorov-distance
e and maxh∈S c Nh . Since the random variables {ξ` }
between maxh∈Sdc B
`∈N are independent, we
n,h
d
can directly calculate the conditional covariance
Cov|Zn
e , B
en,i
B
=
n,h
L
X
36
Vb`,h Vb`,i β`,h β`,i
σh σi τ (ti )τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2 (ti (1 − ti ))2 n
`=1
42
with the extra notation
Z
1
β`,h =
0
bLsc
k(s, th ) I{` ≤ bLsc} −
ds.
L
Let θd denote the distance
e , B
en,i
− Σh,i .
Cov|Zn B
n,h
θd = max
1≤h,i≤s
Using the fact that maxh∈Sdc maxL
`=1 |β`,h | ≤ 1 a straightforward adaption of Lemma E.8 in Jirak
(2015a) gives
P
L
max
1≤h,i≤s
36
1 Xb b
−δ
V
>
n
. L−2 n−C
V
β
β
−
γ
τ
e
(t
,
t
)
I
Ld
`,h `,i `,h `,i
h,i
h i
(th (1 − th ))2 (ti (1 − ti ))2 KL
`=1
for sufficiently small constants C, δ > 0, where the set Ld is defined in (7.38). Using the lower
2 τ 2 yields
bound σh σi τ (th )τ (ti ) ≥ σ−
−
P C(δ)C . n−C
(7.40)
for the set
o
n
C(δ) := θd ILd ≤ n−δ .
For a sufficiently small C > 0 we have
C
C
C
C
C
−C
= o(1).
≤ nC E P|Zn (LC
P P|Zn (LC
d ∪ C(δ) ) = n P Ld ∪ C(δ)
d ∪ C(δ) ) ≥ n
Now, we can derive the following upper bound
d
d
e ≤ x − P max Nh ≤ x
sup P|Zn max B
n,h
h=1
h=1
x∈R
d
d
e
≤ sup P|Zn max Bn,h ≤ x − P max Nh ≤ x ILd ∩C(δ) + OP (n−C ).
h=1
h=1
x∈R
(7.41)
The identities γh,h = σh2 and τ̃ (th ) = τ 2 (th ) give Σh,h = 1 für alle h ∈ {1, . . . , d}, and by Lemma
3.1 in Chernozhukov et al. (2013) on the set Ld ∩ C(δ) we have for the first summand in (7.41)
e
sup P|Zn maxc Bn,h ≤ x − P maxc Nh ≤ x ILd ∩C(δ)
(7.42)
x∈R
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
1/3
max{1, log(d/θd }2/3 ILd ∩C(δ) ≤ n−C ,
(7.43)
Combining (7.41) and (7.42) yields for the Kolmogorov distance
e
sup P|Zn maxc Bn,h ≤ x − P maxc Nh ≤ x = op (1).
(7.44)
. θd
x∈R
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
43
The proof now follows observing the bound max1≤h,i≤s |Σh,i | ≤ max1≤h,i≤s |ρh,i | for the covariance
matrix of N , which was derived (see the proof of Lemma 3.7) and using adapted scaling sequences
(see proof of Corollary 3.11), which yields
G if Sdc = {1, . . . , d},
D
ad maxc Nh − bd =⇒
G + 2 log c if |Sdc | = c · d + o(d) for c ∈ (0, 1),
h∈Sd
0 if |Sdc | = o(d).
Lemma 7.3 Conditionally on Zn it holds that
P
e ∗ −→
e − ad max B
0.
ad maxc B
n,h
n,h
c
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
Proof. The covariance kernel k satisfies for all t, t0 , s ∈ [0, 1] |k(s, t) − k(s, t0 )| ≤ 2|t − t0 |. Due to
(th (1 − th ))2 τ (th ) ≥ t4 τ− we derive the bound
Z 1
√
1 e (L)
∗
e
e
ad maxc Bn,h − maxc Bn,h . ad n maxc
Un,h (s) |k(s, th ) − k(s, t̂h )|ds
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd 0 σh
√
1 e (L)
Un,h (s) maxc |t̂h − th |.
. ad n maxc max
h∈Sd s∈[0,1] σh
h∈Sd
Choosing C sufficiently it follows from Corollary 3.3 in Jirak (2015a) that for all ε > 0
C
P|Z n maxc |th − t̂h | > ε = op (1).
h∈Sd
(7.45)
Theorem 2.5 and 4.4 from the same reference imply the weak convergence
√
1 e (L)
ed
D
ed
n maxc max
=⇒ G
Un,h (s) −
h∈Sd s∈[0,1] σh
4
p
conditionally on Zn in probability with ed = 2 log(2d). This yields
√ −C
1 e (L)
P|Zn ad nn maxc max
Un,h (s) > ε = op (1)
h∈Sd s∈[0,1] σh
for all ε > 0, which completes the proof of Lemma 7.3.
Lemma 7.4 Conditionally on Zn it holds that
e ∗ − ad max B ∗ −→ 0.
ad maxc B
n,h
n,h
c
P
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
Proof. Define PL
|Zn (·) = P|Zn (· ∩ Ld ) with Ld introduced in (7.38). By Lemma 7.1 the claim follows
if we can verify
ε
∗
∗
e∗
e ∗ > ε ≤ PL
− maxc B
= op (1).
(7.46)
PL
maxc Bn,h
n,h
|Zn maxc Bn,h − Bn,h >
|Zn
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
ad
ad
44
We have the trivial bound
∗
e∗ .
e ∗ ≤ max B ∗ − B
maxc Bn,h
− maxc B
n,h
n,h
n,h
c
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
Assumption (T2) and (C1) imply σh ≥ σ− and τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2 ≥ τ− t4 , which yields
√
Z 1
6 n
(L)
∗
∗
e (L) (s) k(s, t̂h )ds
e
Bn,h − Bn,h =
U
(s)
−
U
n,h
n,h
σh τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2 0
Z 1
√
(L)
e (L) (s) k(s, t̂h )ds
. n
U (s) − U
.
√
n,h
0
n,h
(L)
e (L) (s) ≤ S (1) + S (2) ,
n max Un,h (s) − U
n,h
n,h
n,h
s∈[0,1]
where we use the notation
bLsc
L
X
1 X b
(1)
Sn,h = max √
ξj Vj,h (bnsc) −
ξj Vbj,h (n) ,
n
s∈[0,1]
j=1
(2)
Sn,h = max
s∈[0,1]
j=1
bLsc
bnsc
√ − √
n n L n
L
X
ξj Vbj,h (n)
j=1
In the proof of Theorem C.4 from Jirak (2015b) it is shown, that
ε
(1)
= op (1)
PL
|Z maxc Sn,h >
h∈Sd
ad
for all ε > 0. The second summand can be bounded by
L
(2)
Sn,h = max
s∈[0,1]
1
≤ √
nL
bnsc bLscK
1 X b
√
−
ξj Vj,h (n)
K
K
nL
j=1
L
X
ξj Vbj,h (n)
j=1
and it follows again from the above reference
PL
|Zn
L
ε
1 X b
maxc √
ξj Vj,h (n) >
h∈Sd
ad
nL
= op (1)
j=1
for all ε > 0, which finishes the proof of Lemma 7.4
Lemma 7.5 The weak convergence
G if Sdc = {1, . . . , d},
D
(I)
ad maxc Bn,h − bd =⇒
G + 2 log c if |Sdc | = c · d + o(d) for c ∈ (0, 1),
h∈Sd
0 if |Sdc | = o(d)
holds conditionally on Zn .
45
(7.47)
Proof. Combining Lemmas 7.2, 7.3 and 7.4 already gives assertion (7.47) for the random variables
∗ . We use the additional notation
Bn,h
Q−
d = minc
h∈Sd
sbh τ̂h (t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2
sbh τ̂h (t̂h (1 − t̂h ))2
+
und
Q
=
max
d
h∈Sdc σh τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2
σh τ (th )(th (1 − th ))2
+
−2
and the set Qd = Q−
d − 1 ∨ Qd − 1 ≤ δd with δd = (log d) . Let ud (x) = x/ad + bd , then we
obtain for fixed ε > 0 and d sufficiently large
(I)
∗
c
P|Zn maxc Bn,h ≤ ud (x − ε) − P|Zn (Qd ) ≤ P|Zn maxc Bn,h ≤ ud (x)
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
∗
≤ ud (x + ε) + P|Zn (Qcd ) .
≤ P|Zn maxc Bn,h
h∈Sd
Combining Proposition 3.5 from Jirak (2015a) with assertion (7.45) one can easily verify that
P|Zn (Qcd ) = op (1) and the remainder of the proof can be done analogously to the proof of Theorem
3.10.
Lemma 7.6 Conditionally on Zn it holds that
(I)
P
ad maxc Bn,h − ad maxc Bn,h −→ 0.
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
Proof. For fixed ε > 0 we have
(I)
(I)
P ad maxc Bn,h − maxc Bn,h > ε ≤ P ad maxc Bn,h − Bn,h > ε
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
n
o
−1/4
−1/4
≤ P maxc I |∆b
µh | ≤ n
> ε = P minc |∆b
µh | ≤ n
.
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
The proof now follows by
−1/4
−1/4
−1/4
P minc |∆b
µh | ≤ n
= P minc |∆b
µh | ≤ n
, minc |∆µh | ≤ 2n
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
−1/4
−1/4
+ P minc |∆b
µh | ≤ n
, minc |∆µh | > 2n
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
≤ P minc |∆µh | ≤ 2n−1/4 + P minc |∆µh | − minc |∆b
µh | > n−1/4
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
−1/4
≤ P K minc |∆µh | ≤ 2 + P maxc |∆µh − ∆b
µh | > n
= o(1),
h∈Sd
h∈Sd
where we also used that K = n1−` and that Assumption 5.2 implies 1 − ` < 1/4 together with
lim K minc |∆µh | = ∞ .
n,d→∞
h∈Sd
46
| 10math.ST
|
Annals of Mathematical Sciences and Applications
Volume 0, Number 0, 1–9, 0000
arXiv:1711.04451v1 [cs.CV] 13 Nov 2017
Visual Concepts and Compositional Voting
Jianyu Wang, Zhishuai Zhang, Cihang Xie, Yuyin Zhou, Vittal
Premachandran, Jun Zhu, Lingxi Xie, Alan Yuille
It is very attractive to formulate vision in terms of pattern
theory [26], where patterns are defined hierarchically by compositions of elementary building blocks. But applying pattern theory
to real world images is currently less successful than discriminative methods such as deep networks. Deep networks, however, are
black-boxes which are hard to interpret and can easily be fooled
by adding occluding objects. It is natural to wonder whether by
better understanding deep networks we can extract building blocks
which can be used to develop pattern theoretic models. This motivates us to study the internal representations of a deep network
using vehicle images from the PASCAL3D+ dataset. We use clustering algorithms to study the population activities of the features
and extract a set of visual concepts which we show are visually
tight and correspond to semantic parts of vehicles. To analyze this
we annotate these vehicles by their semantic parts to create a new
dataset, VehicleSemanticParts, and evaluate visual concepts as unsupervised part detectors. We show that visual concepts perform
fairly well but are outperformed by supervised discriminative methods such as Support Vector Machines (SVM). We next give a more
detailed analysis of visual concepts and how they relate to semantic parts. Following this, we use the visual concepts as building
blocks for a simple pattern theoretical model, which we call compositional voting. In this model several visual concepts combine to
detect semantic parts. We show that this approach is significantly
better than discriminative methods like SVM and deep networks
trained specifically for semantic part detection. Finally, we return
to studying occlusion by creating an annotated dataset with occlusion, called VehicleOcclusion, and show that compositional voting
outperforms even deep networks when the amount of occlusion becomes large.
Keywords: Pattern theory, deep networks, visual concepts.
1. Introduction
It is a pleasure to write an article for a honoring David Mumford’s enormous contributions to both artificial and biological vision. This article ad1
2
dresses one of David’s main interests, namely the development of grammatical and pattern theoretic models of vision [48][26]. These are generative
models which represent objects and images in terms of hierarchical compositions of elementary building blocks. This is arguably the most promising
approach to developing models of vision which have the same capabilities as
the human visual system and can deal with the exponential complexity of
images and visual tasks. Moreover, as boldly conjectured by David [27, 17],
they suggest plausible models of biological visual systems and, in particular,
the role of top-down processing.
But despite the theoretical attractiveness of pattern theoretic methods
they have not yet produced visual algorithms capable of competing with
alternative discriminative approaches such as deep networks. One reason
for this is that, due to the complexity of image patterns, it very hard to
specify their underlying building blocks patterns (by contrast, it is much
easier to develop grammars for natural languages where the building blocks,
or terminal nodes, are words). But deep networks have their own limitations,
despite their ability to learn hierarchies of image features in order to perform
an impressive range of visual tasks on challenging datasets. Deep networks
are black boxes which are hard to diagnose and they have limited ability to
adapt to novel data which were not included in the dataset on which they
were trained. For example, figure (1) shows how the performance of a deep
network degrades when we superimpose a guitar on the image of a monkey.
The presence of the guitar causes the network to misinterpret the monkey as
being a human while also mistaking the guitar for a bird. The deep network
presumably makes these mistakes because it has never seen a monkey with
a guitar, or a guitar with a monkey in the jungle (but has seen a bird in the
jungle or a person with a musical instrument). In short, the deep network
is over-fitting to the typical context of the object.
But over-fitting to visual context is problematic for standard machine
learning approaches, such as deep networks, which assume that their training and testing data is representative of some underlying, but unknown,
distribution [37, 38]. The problem is that images, and hence visual context,
can be infinitely variable. A realistic image can be created by selecting from
a huge range of objects (e.g., monkeys, guitars, dogs, cats, cars, etc.) and
placing them in an enormous number of different scenes (e.g., jungle, beach,
office) and in an exponential number of different three-dimensional positions.
Moreover, in typical images, objects are usually occluded as shown in figure (1). Occlusion is a fundamental aspect of natural images and David has
recognized its importance both by proposing a 2.1 D sketch representation
3
Figure 1: Caption: Adding occluders causes deep network to fail. We refer such examples as adversarial context examples since the failures are
caused by misusing context/occluder info. Left Panel: The occluding motorbike turns a monkey into a human. Center Panel: The occluding bicycle
turns a monkey into a human and the jungle turns the bicycle handle into
a bird. Right Panel: The occluding guitar turns the monkey into a human
and the jungle turns the guitar into a bird.
[28] and also by using it as the basis for a “dead leaves” model for image
statistics [18].
Indeed the number of ways that an object can be occluded is, in itself,
exponential. For example, if an object has P different parts then we can occlude any subset of them using any of N different occluders yielding O(P N )
possible occluding patterns. In the face of this exponential complexity the
standard machine learning assumptions risk breaking down. We will never
have enough data both to train, and to test, black box vision algorithms.
As in well known many image datasets have confounds which mean that
algorithms trained on them rarely generalize to other datasets [4])İnstead
we should be aiming for visual algorithms that can learn objects (and other
image structures) from limited amounts of data (large, but not exponentially large). In addition, we should devise strategies where the algorithms
can be tested on potentially infinite amounts of training data. One promising strategy is to expand the role of adversarial noise [34][10][45], so that
we can create images which stress-test algorithms and deliberately target
their weaknesses. This strategy is more reminiscent of game theory than the
standard assumptions of machine learning (e.g., decision theory).
This motivates a research program which we initiate in this paper by
addressing three issues. Firstly, we analyze the internal structure of deep
networks in order both to better understand them but, more critically, to
extract internal representations which can be used as building blocks for
pattern theoretic models. We call these representations visual concepts and
extract them by analyzing the population codes of deep networks. We quantify their ability for detecting semantic parts of objects. Secondly, we develop
4
a simple compositional-voting model to detect semantic parts of objects by
using these building blocks. These models are similar to those in [1]. Thirdly,
we stress test these compositional models, and deep networks for comparison,
on datasets where we have artificially introduced occluders. We emphasize
that neither algorithm, compositional-voting or the deep network, has been
trained on the occluded data and our goal is to stress test them to see how
well they perform under these adversarial conditions.
In order to perform these studies we have constructed two datasets based
on the PASCAL3D+ dataset [43]. Firstly, we annotate the semantic parts
of the vehicles in this dataset to create the VehicleSemanticPart dataset.
Secondly, we create the Vehicle Occlusion dataset by superimposing cutouts
of objects from the PASCAL segmentation dataset [8] into images from the
VehicleSemanticPart dataset. We use the VehicleSemanticPart dataset to
extract visual concepts by clustering the features of a deep network VGG16 [33], trained on ImageNet, when the deep network is shown objects from
VehicleSemanticPart. We evaluate the visual concepts, the compositionalvoting mode;s, and the deep networks for detecting semantic parts image
with and without occlusion, i.e. VehicleSemanticPart and Vehicle Occlusion
respectively.
2. Related Work
David’s work on pattern theory [26] was inspired by Grenander’s seminal
work [11] (partly due to an ARL center grant which encouraged collaboration between Brown University and Harvard). David was bold enough to
conjecture that the top-down neural connections in the visual cortex were for
performing analysis by synthesis [27]. Advantages of this approach include
the theoretical ability to deal with large numbers of objects by part sharing
[46]. But a problem for these types of models was the difficulty in specifying
suitable building blocks which makes learning grammars for vision considerably harder than learning them for natural language [35, 36]. For example,
researchers could learn some object models in an unsupervised manner, e.g.,
see [49], but this only used edges as the building blocks and hence ignored
most of the appearance properties of objects. Attempts have been made to
obtain building blocks by studying properties of image patches [30] and [5]
but these have yet to be developed into models of objects. Though promising, these are pixel-based and are sensitive to spatial warps of images and
do not, as yet, capture the hierarchy of abstraction that seems necessary to
deal with the complexity of real images.
5
Deep networks, on the other hand, have many desirable properties. such
as hierarchies of feature vectors (shared across objects) which capture increasingly abstract, or invariant, image patterns as they ascend the hierarchy
from the image to the object level. This partial invariance arises because they
are trained in a discriminative way so that decisions made about whether
a viewed object is a car or not must be based on hierarchical abstractions.
It has been shown, see [47][22][44][32], that the activity patterns of deep
network features do encode objects and object parts, mainly be considering
the activities of individual neurons in the deep networks.
Our approach to study the activation patterns of populations of neuron
[40] was inspired by the well-known neuroscience debate about the neural code. On one extreme is the concept of grandmother calls described by
Barlow [3] which is contrasted to population encoding as reported by Georgopoulos et al. [9]. Barlow was motivated by the finding that comparatively
few neurons are simultaneously active and proposed sparse coding as a general principle. In particular, this suggests a form of extreme sparsity where
only one, or a few cells, respond to a specific local stimulus (similar to a
matched template). As we will see in section (6), visual concepts tend to
have this property which is developed further in later work. There are, of
course, big differences between studying population codes in artificial neural networks and studying them for real neurons. In particular, as we will
show, we can modify the neural network so that the populations representing a visual concept can be encoded by visual concept neurons, which we
call vc-neurons. Hence our approach is consistent with both extreme neuroscience perspectives. We might speculate that the brain uses both forms of
neural encoding useful for different purposes: a population, or signal representation, and a sparser symbolic representation. This might be analogous
to how words can be represented as binary encodings (e.g., cat, dog, etc.)
and by continuous vector space encodings which similarity between vectors
captures semantic information [25]. Within this picture, neurons could represent a manifold of possibilities which the vc-neurons would quantize into
discrete elements.
We illustrate the use of visual concepts to build a compositional-voting
model inspired by [1], which is arguably the simplest pattern theoretic
method. We stress that voting schemes have frequently been used in computer vision without being thought of as examples of pattern theory methods [12][19][24][29].
To stress test our algorithms we train them on un-occluded images and
test them on datasets with occlusion. Occlusion is almost always present
in natural images, though less frequently in computer vision datasets, and
6
is fundamental to human perception. David’s work has long emphasized its
significance [28], [18] and it is sufficiently important for computer vision
researchers to have addressed it using deep networks [39]. It introduces difficulties for tasks such as object detection [16] or segmentation [20]. As has
already been shown, part-based models are very useful for detecting partially
occluded objects [7] [6][21].
3. The Datasets
In this paper we use three related annotated datasets. The first is the vehicles in the PASCAL3D+ dataset [43] and their keypoint interactions. The
second is the VehicleSemanticPart dataset which we created by annotating
semantic parts on the vehicles in the PASCAL3D+ dataset to give a richer
representation of the objects than the keypoints. The third is the Vehicle
Occlusion dataset where we occluded the objects in the first two datasets.
The vehicles in the PASCAL3D+ dataset are: (i) cars, (ii) airplanes,
(iii) motorbikes, (iv) bicycles, (v) buses, and (vi) trains. These images in
the PASCAL3D+ dataset are selected from the Pascal and the ImageNet
datasets. In this paper we report results only for those images from ImageNet, but we obtain equivalent results on PASCAL, see arxiv paper [40].
These images were supplemented with keypoint annotations (roughly ten
keypoints per object) and also estimated orientations of the objects in terms
of the azimuth and the elevation angles. These objects and their keypoints
are illustrated in figure (2)(upper left panel).
We use this dataset to extract the visual concepts, as described in the
following section. In order to do this, we first re-scale the images so that
the minimum of the height and width is 224 pixels (keeping the aspect
ratio fixed). We also use the keypoint annotations to evaluate the ability of
the visual concepts to detect the keypoints. But there are typically only 10
keypoints for each object which means they can only give limited evaluation
of the visual concepts.
In order to test the visual concepts in more detail we defined semantic
parts on the vehicles and annotated them to create a dataset called VehicleSemanticParts. There are thirty nine semantic parts for cars, nineteen for
motorbikes, ten for buses, thirty one for aeroplanes, fourteen for bicycles,
and twenty for trains. The semantic parts are regions of 100 × 100 pixels
and provide a dense coverage of the objects, in the sense that almost every pixel on each object image is contained within a semantic part. The
semantic parts have verbal descriptions, which are specified in the webpage
7
Figure 2: The figure illustrates the keypoints on the PASCAl3D+ dataset.
For cars, there are keypoints for wheels, headlights, windshield corners and
trunk corners. Keypoints are specified on salient parts of other objects. Best
seen in color.
http://ccvl.jhu.edu/SP.html. The annotators were trained by being provided by: (1) a one-sentence verbal description, and (2) typical exemplars.
The semantic parts are illustrated in figure (3) where we show a representative subset of the annotations indexed by “A”, “B”, etc. The car annotations
are described in the figure caption and the annotations for the other objects
are as follows: (I) Airplane Semantic Parts. A: nose pointing to the right,
B: undercarriage, C: jet engine, mainly tube-shape, sometimes with highly
turned ellipse/circle, D: body with small windows or text, E: wing or elevator tip pointing to the left, F: vertical stabilizer, with contour from top left
to bottom right, G: vertical stabilizer base and body, with contour from top
left to bottom right. (II) Bicycle Semantic Parts. A: wheels, B: pedal, C:
roughly triangle structure between seat, pedal, and handle center, D: seat,
E: roughly T-shape handle center. (III) Bus Semantic Parts. A: wheels, B:
headlight, C: license plate, D: window (top) and front body (bottom), E:
display screen with text, F: window and side body with vertical frame in
the middle, G: side windows and side body. (IV) Motorbike Semantic Parts.
A: wheels, B: headlight, C: engine, D: seat. (V) Train Semantic Parts. A:
front window and headlight, B: headlight, C: part of front window on the
left and side body, D: side windows or doors and side body, E: head body
on the right or bottom right and background, F: head body on the top left
and background.).
In order to study occlusion we create the VehicleOcclusion dataset.
This consists of images from the VehicleSemanticPart dataset. Then we add
8
Figure 3: This figure illustrates the semantic parts labelled on the six vehicles
in the VehicleSemanticParts dataset (remaining panels). For example, for car
semantic parts. A: wheels, B: side body, C: side window, D: side mirror and
side window and wind shield, E: wind shield and engine hood, F: oblique
line from top left to bottom right, wind shield, G: headlight, H: engine hood
and air grille, I: front bumper and ground, J: oblique line from top left to
bottom right, engine hood. The parts are weakly viewpoint dependent. See
text for the semantic parts of the other vehicles.
occlusion by randomly superimposing a few (one, two, or three) occluders,
which are objects from PASCAL segmentation dataset [8], onto the images.
To prevent confusion, the occluders are not allowed to be vehicles. We also
vary the size of the occluders, more specifically the fraction of occluded pixels
from all occluders on the target object, is constrained to lie in three ranges
0.2−0.4, 0.4−0.6 and 0.6−0.8. To compute these fractions requires estimating the sizes of the vehicles in the VehicleSemanticPart dataset, which can be
done using the 3D object models associated to the images in PASCAL3D+.
4. The Visual Concepts
We now analyze the activity patterns within deep networks and show that
they give rise to visual concepts which correspond to part/subparts of objects and which can be used as building blocks for compositional models.
In section (4.2) we obtain the visual concepts by doing K-means clustering
followed by a merging stage. Next in section (4.3), we show an alternative
unsupervised method which converges to similar visual concepts, but which
can be implemented directly by a modified deep network with additional
(unsupervised) nodes/neurons. Section (4.4) gives visualization of the visual
concepts. Section (4.5) evaluates them for detecting keypoints and semantic
parts.
9
Figure 4: Examples for occluded cars with occlusion level 1,5 and 9 respectively. Level 1 means 2 occluders with fraction 0.2-0.4 of the object area
occluded, level 5 means 3 occluders with fraction 0.4-0.6 occluded, and level
9 means 4 occluders with fraction 0.6-0.8 occluded.
4.1. Notation
We first describe the notation used in this paper. The image is defined on
the image lattice and deep network feature vectors are defined on a hierarchy of lattices. The visual concepts are computed at different layers of
the hierarchy, but in this paper we will concentrate on the pool-4 layer, of
a VGG-16 [33] trained on ImageNet for classification, and only specify the
algorithms for this layer (it is trivial to extend the algorithms to other layers). The groundtruth annotations, i.e. the positions of the semantic parts,
are defined on the image lattice. Hence we specify correspondence between
points of the image lattice and points on the hierarchical lattices. Visual
concepts will never be activated precisely at the location of a semantic part,
so we specify a neighborhood of allow for tolerance in spatial location. In
the following section, we will use more sophisticated neighborhoods which
depend on the visual concepts and the semantic parts.
An image I is defined on the image lattice L0 by a set of three-dimensional
color vectors {Iq : q ∈ L0 }. Deep network feature vectors are computed on a
hierarchical set of lattices Ll , where l indicates the layer with Ll ⊂ Ll−1 for
l = 0, 1, .... This paper concentrates on the pool-4 layer L4 . We define correspondence between the image lattice and the pool-4 lattice by the mappings
π07→4 (.) from L0 to L4 and π47→0 (.) from L4 to L0 respectively. The function
π47→0 (.) gives the exact mapping from L4 to L0 (recall the lattices are defined
so that L4 ⊂ L0 ). Conversely, π07→4 (q) denotes the closest position at the L4
layer grid that corresponds to q, i.e., π07→4 (q) = arg minp Dist(q, L0 (p)).
The deep network feature vectors at the pool-4 layer are denoted by
{fp : p ∈ L4 }. These feature vectors are computed by fp = f (Ip ), where
the function f is specified by the deep network and Ip is an image patch, a
10
subregion of the input image I, centered on a point π47→0 (p) on the image
lattice L0 .
The visual concepts {VCv : v ∈ V} at the pool-4 layer are specified by
a set of feature vectors {fv : v ∈ V}. They will be learnt by clustering
the pool-4 layer feature vectors {fp } computed from all the images in the
dataset. The activation of a visual concept VCv to a feature vector fp at
p ∈ L4 is a decreasing function of ||fv − fp || (see later for more details).
The visual concepts will be learnt in an unsupervised manner from a set
T = {In : n = 1, ..., N } of images, which in this paper will be vehicle
images from PASCAL3D+ (with tight bounding boxes round the objects
and normalized sizes).
The semantic parts are given by {SPs ∈ S} and are pre-defined for
each vehicle class, see section (3) and the webpage http://ccvl.jhu.edu/
SP.html. These semantic parts are annotated on the image dataset {In :
n = 1, ..., N } by specifying sets of pixels on the image lattice corresponding
to their centers (each semantic part corresponds to an image patch of size
100 × 100). For a semantic part SPs , we define Ts+ to be the set of points q
on the image lattices L0 where they have been labeled. From these labels,
we compute a set of points Ts− where the semantic part is not present
(constrained so that each point in Ts− is at least γ pixels from every point
in Ts+ , where γ is chosen to ensure no overlap).
We specify a circular neighborhood N (q) for all points q on the image
lattices L0 , given by {p ∈ L0 s.t. ||p − q|| ≤ γth }. This neighborhood is
used when we evaluate if a visual concept responds to a semantic part by
allowing some uncertainty in the relative location, i.e. we reward a visual
concept if it responds near a semantic part, where nearness is specified by the
neighborhood. Hence a visual concept at pixel p ∈ L4 responds to a semantic
part s at position q provided ||fv − fp || is small and π47→0 (p) ∈ N (q). In this
paper the neighborhood radius γth is set to be 56 pixels for the visual concept
experiments in this section, but was extended to 120 for our late work on
voting, see section (5). For voting, we start with this large neighborhood but
then learn more precise neighborhoods which localize the relative positions
of visual concept responses to the positions of semantic parts.
4.2. Learning visual concepts by K-means
We now describe our first method for extracting visual concepts which uses
the K-means algorithm. First we extract pool-4 layer feature vectors {fp }
using the deep network VGG-16 [33] from our set of training images T . We
normalize them to unit norm, i.e. such that |fp | = 1, ∀p.
11
Figure 5: Left Panel: The images I are specified on the image lattice L0 and
a deep network extracts features on a hierarchy of lattices. We concentrate
on the features {fp } at pool-4 lattice L4 . Projection functions π47→0 () and
π07→4 () map pixels from L4 to L0 and vice versa. We study visual concepts
VCv at layer L4 and relate them to semantic parts SPs defined on the image
lattice. Center Panel: the visual concepts are obtained by clustering the
normalized feature vectors {fp }, using either K-means or a mixture of Von
Mises-Fisher. Right Panel: extracting visual concepts by a mixture of Von
Mises-Fisher is attractive since it incorporates visual concepts within the
deep network by adding additional visual concept neurons (vc-neurons).
Then we use K-means++ [2], to cluster the feature vectors into a set V
of visual concepts. Each visual concept VCv has an index v ∈ {1, 2, . . . , |V|}
and is specified by its clustering center: fv ∈ R512 (where 512 is the dimension
of the feature vector at pool-4 of VGG-net.)
In mathematical terms, P
the K-means algorithm attempts to minimize a
cost function F (V, {fv }) = v,p Vp,v ||fp − fv ||2 , with respect to the assignment variable V and the cluster centers {fv }. The assignment variables V
impose hard assignment so that each feature vector fp is assigned to only
one visual concept fv , i.e. for each p, Vp,v∗ = 1 if v∗ = argminv ||fp − fv ||,
and Vp,v = 0 otherwise. The K-means algorithm minimizes the cost function
F (V, fv }) by minimizing with respect to V and {fv } alternatively. The Kmeans++ algorithm initializes K-means by taking into account the statistics
of the data {fp }. We took a random sample of 100 feature vectors per image
as input.
The number of clusters K = |V| is important in order to get good visual
concepts and we found that typically 200 visual concepts were needed for
each object. We used two strategies to select a good value for K. The first
is to specify a discrete set of values for K (64, 128, 256, 512), determine
12
how detection performance depends on K, and select the value of K with
best performance. The second is start with an initial set of clusters followed
by a merging stage. We use the Davies-Boundin index as a measure for the
σk +σm
“goodness” of a cluster k. This is given by DB(k) = maxm6=k ||f
, where
k −fl ||
fk and fm denote the centers of clusters k and m respectively. σk and σm
denote the average distance of all data points in clusters k and m to their
P
respective cluster centers, i.e., σk = n1k p∈Ck ||fp − fk ||2 , where Ck = {p :
Vp,k = 1} is the set of data points that are assigned to cluster k. The DaviesBoundin index take small values for clusters which have small variance of the
P
feature vectors assigned to them, i.e. where p:Vp,v =1 |fp − fv |2 /nv is small
P
(with nv = p:Vp,v =1 1), but which are also well separated from other visual
clusters, i.e., |fv − fµ | is large for all µ 6= v. We initialize the algorithm with
K clusters (e.g., 256, or 512) rank them by the Davies-Boundin index, and
merge them in a greedy manner until the index is below a threshold, see our
longer report [40] for more details. In our experiments we show results with
and without cluster merging, and the differences between them are fairly
small.
4.3. Learning Visual Concepts by a mixture of von Mises-Fisher
distributions
We can also learn visual concepts by modifying the deep network to include
additional vc neurons which are connected to the neurons (or nodes) in the
deep network by soft-max layers, see figure (5). This is an attractive alternative to K-means because it allows visual concepts to be integrated naturally
within deep networks, enabling the construction of richer architectures which
share both signal and symbolic features (the deep network features and the
visual concepts). In this formulation, both the feature vectors {fp } and the
visual concepts {fv } are normalized so lie on the unit hypersphere. Theoretical and practical advantages of using features defined on the hypersphere
are described in [41].
This can be formalized as unsupervised learning where the data, i.e. the
feature vectors {fp }, are generated by a mixture of von Mises-Fisher distributions [13]. Intuitively, this is fairly similar to K-means (since K-means
relates to learning a mixture of Gaussians, with fixed isotropic variance, and
von-Mises-Fisher relates to an isotropic Gaussian as discussed in the next
paragraph). Learning a mixture of von Mises-Fisher can be implemented by
a neural network, which is similar to the classic result relating K-means to
competitive neural networks [14].
13
The von-Mises Fisher distribution is of form:
P (fp |fv ) =
(1)
1
exp{ηfp · fv },
Z(η)
where η is a constant, Z(η) is a normalization factor, and fp and fv are both
unit vectors. This requires us to normalize the weights of the visual concepts, so that |fv | = 1, ∀v, as well as the feature vectors {fp }. Arguably it is
more natural to normalize both the feature vectors and the visual concepts
(instead of only normalizing the feature vectors as we did in the last section). There ia a simple relationship between von-Mises Fisher and isotropic
Gaussian distributions. The square distance term ||fp − fv || becomes equal
to 2(1 − fp · fv ) if ||fp || = ||fv || = 1. Hence an isotropic Gaussian distribution
on fp with mean fv reduces to von Mises-Fisher if both vectors are required
to lie on the unit sphere.
Learning a mixture of von Mises-Fisher can be formulated in terms of
neural networks where the cluster centers, i.e. the visual concepts, are specified by visual concept neurons, or vc-neurons, with weights {fv }. This can
be shown as follows. Recall that Vp,v is the assignment variable between a
feature vector fp and each visual concept fv , and denote the set of assignment by Vp = {Vp,v : v ∈ V} During learning this assignment variable Vp is
unknown but we can use the EM algorithm, which involving replacing the
Vp,v by a distribution qv (p) for the probability that Vp,v = 1.
The EM algorithm can be expressed in terms of minimizing the following
free energy function with respect to {qv } and {fv }:
(2)
X X
X
F({qv }, {fv }) = −
{
qv (p) log P (fp , Vp |{fv }) +
qv (p) log qv (p)},
p
v
v
The update rules for the assignments and the visual concepts are respectively:
(3)
exp{ηfp · fvt }
qvt = P
t
µ exp{ηfp · fµ }
fvt+1 = fvt − ηqvt fv + η,
where η is a Lagrange multiplier to enforce |fvt+1 | = 1.
Observe that the update for the assignments are precisely the standard
neural network soft-max operation where the {fv } are interpreted as the
weights of vc-neurons and the neurons compete so that their activity sums
to 1 [14]. After the learning algorithm has converged this softmax activation indicates soft-assignment of a feature vector fp to the vc-neurons. This
corresponds to the network shown in figure (5).
14
This shows that learning visual concepts can be naturally integrated
into a deep network. This can either be done, as we discussed here, after the
weights of a deep network have been already learnt. Or alternatively, the
weights of the vc neurons can be learnt at the same times as the weights of
the deep network. In the former case, the algorithm simply minimizes a cost
function:
(4)
−
X
v
X
exp{ηfp · fv }
P
log
exp{ηfp · fν },
ν exp{ηfp · fν }
ν
which can be obtained from the EM free energy by solving for the {qv }
p ·fv }
directly in terms of {fv }, to obtain qv = Pexp{ηf
, and substituting this
ν exp{ηfp ·fν }
back into the free energy.
Learning the visual concepts and the deep network weights simultaneously is performed by adding this cost function to the standard penalty
function for the deep network. This is similar to the regularization method
reported in [23]. Our experiments showed that learning the visual concepts
and the deep network weights simultaneously risks collapsing the features
vectors and the visual concepts to a trivial solution.
4.4. Visualizing the Visual Concepts
We visualize the visual concepts by observing the image patches which are
assigned to each cluster by K-means. We observe that the image patches
for each visual concept roughly correspond to semantic parts of the object
classes with larger parts at higher pooling levels, see figure (6). This paper
concentrates on visual concepts at the pool-4 layer because these are most
similar in scale to the semantic parts which were annotated. The visual
concepts at pool-3 layer are at a smaller scale, which makes it harder to
evaluate them using the semantic parts. The visual concepts at the pool-5
layer have two disadvantages. Firstly, they correspond to regions of the image
which are larger than the semantic parts. Secondly, their effective receptive
field sizes which were significantly smaller than their theoretical receptive
field size (determined by using deconvolution networks to find which regions
of the image patches affected the visual concept response) which meant that
they appeared less tight when we visualized them (because only the central
regions of the image patches activated them, so the outlying regions can
vary a lot).
Our main findings are that the pool-4 layer visual concepts are: (i) very
tight visually, in the sense that image patches assigned to the same visual
15
Figure 6: This figure shows example visual concepts on different object categories from
the VehicleSemanticPart dataset, for layers pool3, pool4 and pool5. Each row visualizes
three visual concepts with four example patches, which are randomly selected from a pool
of the closest 100 image patches. These visual concepts are visually and semantically tight.
We can easily identify the semantic meaning and parent object class.
Figure 7: This figure shows that visual concepts typically give a dense coverage of
the different parts of the objects, in this case a car.
concept tend to look very similar which is illustrated in figure (8) and (ii) give
a dense coverage of the objects as illustrated in figure (7). Demonstrating
tightness and coverage of the visual concepts is hard to show in a paper,
so we have created a webpage http://ccvl.jhu.edu/cluster.html where
readers can see this for themselves by looking at many examples. To illustrate
visual tightness we show the average of the images and edge maps of the
best 500 patches for a few visual concepts, in figure (8), and compare them
to the averages for single filters. These averages show that the clusters are
tight.
16
(a) pool4 visual concept
(b) pool4 single filter
Figure 8: This figure shows four visual concept examples (left four) and four single filter
examples (right four). The top row contains example image patches, and the bottom two
rows contain average edge maps and intensity maps respectively obtained using top 500
patches.Observe that the means of the visual concepts are sharper than the means of
the single filters for both average edge maps and intensity maps, showing visual concepts
capture patterns more tightly than the single filters.
4.5. Evaluating visual concepts for detecting keypoints and
semantic parts
We now evaluate the visual concepts as detectors of keypoints and semantic
parts (these are used for evaluation only and not for training). Intuitively, a
visual concept VCv is a good detector for a semantic part SPs if the visual
concept “fires” near most occurrences of the semantic part, but rarely fires in
regions of the image where the semantic part is not present. More formally,
a visual concept VCv fires at a position p ∈ L4 provided |fp − fv | < T , where
T is a threshold (which will be varied to get a precision-recall curve). Recall
that for each semantic part s ∈ S we have a set of points Ts+ where the
semantic part occurs, and a set Ts− where it does not. A visual concept v
has a true positive detection for q ∈ Ts+ if minp∈N (q) |fp −fv | < T . Similarly it
has a false positive if the same condition holds for s ∈ Ts− . As the threshold
T varies we obtain a precision-recall curve and report the average precision.
We also consider variants of this approach by seeing if a visual concept
is able to detect several semantic parts. For example, a visual concept which
fires on semantic part “side-window” is likely to also respond to the semantic
parts “front-window” and “back-window”, and hence should be evaluated by
its ability to detect all three types of windows. Note that if a visual concept
is activated for several semantic parts then it will tend to have fairly bad
average precision for each semantic part by itself (because the detection for
the other semantic parts will count as false positives).
17
We show results for two versions of visual concept detectors, with and
without merging indicated by S-VCM and S-VCK respectively. We also implemented two baseline methods for comparison methods. This first baseline
uses the magnitude of a single filter response, and is denoted by S-F. The
second baseline is strongly supervised and trains a support vector machines
(SVM) taking the feature vectors at the pool-4 layer as inputs, notated by
SVM-F. The results we report are based on obtaining visual concepts by
K-means clustering (with or without merging), but we obtain similar results
if we use the von Mises-Fisher online learning approach,
4.5.1. Strategies for Evaluating Visual Concepts. There are two
possible strategies for evaluating visual concepts for detection. The first
strategy is to crop the semantic parts to 100×100 image patches, {P1 , P2 , · · · , Pn },
and provide some negative patches {Pn+1 , Pn+2 , · · · , Pn+m } (where the semantic parts are not present). Then we can calculate the response of V Cv by
calculating Resi = ||fi − fv ||. By sorting those m + n candidates by the VC
responses, we can get a list Pk1 , Pk2 , · · · , Pkm+n in which k1 , k2 , · · · , km+n
is a permutation of 1, 2, · · · , m + n. By varying the threshold from Resk1
to Reskm+n , we can calculate the precision and recall curve. The average
precision can be obtained by averaging the precisions at different recalls.
This first evaluation strategy is commonly used for detection tasks in
computer vision, for example to evaluate edge detection, face detection,
or more generally object detection. But it is not suitable for our purpose
because different semantic parts of object can be visually similar (e.g., the
front, side, and back windows of cars). Hence the false positives of a semantic
part detector will often be other parts of the same object, or a closely related
object (e.g., car and bus semantic parts can be easily confused). In practice,
we will want to detect semantic parts of an object when a large region of
the object is present. The first evaluation strategy does not take this into
account, unless it is modified so that the set of negative patches are carefully
balanced to include large numbers of semantic parts from the same object
class.
Hence we use a second evaluation strategy, which is to crop the object
bounding boxes from a set of images belonging to the same object class to
make sure they only have limited backgrounds, and then select image patches
which densely sample these bounding boxes. This ensures that the negative
image patches are strongly biased towards being other semantic parts of the
object (and corresponds to the typical situation where we will want to detect
semantic parts in practice). It will, however, also introduce image patches
which partly overlap with the semantic parts and hence a visual concept
18
will typically respond multiple times to the same semantic part, which we
address by using non-maximum suppression. More precisely, at each position
a visual concept VCv will have a response ||fp − fv ||. Next we apply nonmaximum suppression to eliminate overlapping detection results, i.e. if two
activated visual concepts have sufficiently similar responses, then the visual
concept with weaker response (i.e. larger ||fp − fv ||) will be suppressed by
the stronger one. Then we proceed as for the first strategy, i.e. threshold
the responses, calculate the false positives and false negatives, and obtain
the precision recall curve by varying the threshold. (A technical issue for
the second strategy is that some semantic parts may be close together, so
after non-maximum suppression, some semantic parts may be missed since
the activated visual concepts could be suppressed by nearby stronger visual
concept responses. Then a low AP will be obtained, even though this visual
concept might be very for detecting that semantic part).
4.5.2. Evaluating single Visual Concepts for Keypoint detection.
To evaluate how well visual concepts detect keypoints we tested them for
vehicles in the PASCAL3D+ dataset and compared them to the two baseline
methods, see table (1). Visual concepts and single filters are unsupervised
so we evaluate them for each keypoint, by by selecting the visual concept, or
single filter, which have best detection performance, as measured by average precision. Not surprisingly, the visual concepts outperformed the single
filters but were less successful than the supervised SVM approach. This is
not surprising, since visual concepts and single filters are unsupervised. The
results are fairly promising for visual concepts since for almost all semantic
parts we either found a visual concept that was fairly successful at detecting
them. We note that typically several visual concepts were good at detecting
each keypoint, recall that there are roughly 200 visual concepts but only approximately 10 keypoints. This suggests that we would get better detection
results by combining visual concepts, as we will do later in this paper.
4.5.3. Evaluating single Visual Concepts for Semantic Part detection. The richer annotations on VehicleSemanticPart allows us to get
better understanding of visual concepts. We use the same evaluation strategy as for keypoints but report results here only for visual concepts with
merging S-VC and for single filters S-F. Our longer report [40] gives results
for different variants of visual concepts (e.g., without merging, with different
values of K, etc.) but there is no significant difference. Our main findings
are: (i) that visual concepts do significantly better than single filters, and (ii)
for every semantic part there is a visual concept that detects it reasonably
19
Car
Bicycle
Motorbike
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 mAP 1 2 3 4 5 mAP 1 2 3 4 mAP
S-F .86 .44 .30 .38 .19 .33 .13 .38 .23 .67 .25 .43 .43 .40 .26 .60 .30 .22 .35
S-VCM .92 .51 .27 .41 .36 .46 .18 .45 .32 .78 .30 .55 .57 .50 .35 .75 .43 .25 .45
S-VCK .94 .51 .32 .53 .36 .48 .22 .48 .35 .80 .34 .53 .63 .53 .40 .76 .44 .43 .51
SVM-F .97 .65 .37 .76 .45 .57 .30 .58 .37 .80 .34 .71 .64 .57 .37 .77 .50 .60 .56
Bus
Train
Aeroplane
1 2 3 4 5 6 mAP 1 2 3 4 5 mAP 1 2 3 4 5 mAP
S-F .45 .42 .23 .38 .80 .22 .42 .39 .33 .24 .16 .15 .25 .41 .25 .22 .13 .31 .26
S-VCM .41 .59 .26 .29 .86 .51 .49 .41 .30 .30 .28 .24 .30 .21 .47 .31 .16 .34 .30
S-VCK .41 .51 .26 .33 .86 .52 .48 .42 .32 .30 .28 .25 .32 .31 .47 .31 .20 .35 .33
SVM-F .74 .70 .52 .63 .90 .61 .68 .71 .49 .50 .36 .39 .49 .72 .60 .50 .32 .49 .53
Table 1: AP values for keypoint detection on PASCAL3D+ dataset for six object categories. Visual concepts, with S-VCm or without S-VCK merging, achieves much higher
results than the single filter baseline S-F. The SVM method SVM-F does significantly
better, but this is not surprising since it is supervised. The keypoint number-name mapping is provided below. Cars – 1: wheel 2: wind shield 3: rear window 4: headlight 5: rear
light 6: front 7: side; Bicycle –1: head center 2: wheel 3: handle 4: pedal 5: seat; Motorbike
– 1: head center 2: wheel 3: handle 4: seat; Bus – 1: front upper corner 2: front lower
corner 3: rear upper corner 4: rear lower corner 5: wheel 6: front center; Train – 1: front
upper corner 2: front lower corner 3: front center 4: upper side 5: lower side; Aeroplane –
1: nose 2: upper rudder 3: lower rudder 4: tail 5: elevator and wing tip.
well. These results, see Table (2), support our claim that the visual concepts
give a dense coverage of each object (since the semantic parts label almost
every part of the object). Later in this paper, see table (3) (known scale),
we compare the performance of SVMs to visual concepts for detecting semantic parts. This comparison uses a tougher evaluation criterion, based on
the interSection over union (IOU) [8], but the relative performance of the
two methods is roughly the same as for the keypoints.
4.5.4. What do the other visual concepts do?. The previous experiments have followed the “best single visual concept evaluation”. In other
words, for each semantic part (or keypoint), we find the single visual concept
which best detects that semantic part. But this ignores three issues: (I) A
visual concept may respond to more than one semantic parts (which means
that its AP for one semantic part is small because the others are treated as
false positives). (II) There are far more visual concepts than semantic parts,
so our previous evaluations have not told us what all the visual concepts
are doing (e.g., for cars there are roughly 200 visual concepts but only 39
semantic parts, so we are only reporting results for twenty percent of the
visual concepts). (III) Several visual concepts may be good for detecting the
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
S-F .86 .87 .84 .68 .70 .83 .83 .82 .72 .18 .22 .49 .33 .25 .22 .18 .37 .18
S-VCM .94 .97 .94 .93 .94 .95 .94 .92 .94 .42 .48 .58 .45 .48 .46 .54 .60 .34
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 mAP
S-F .28 .13 .16 .14 .30 .20 .16 .17 .15 .27 .19 .25 .18 .19 .16 .07 .07 .36
S-VCM .38 .19 .26 .37 .42 .32 .26 .40 .29 .40 .18 .41 .53 .31 .57 .36 .26 .53
(a) Car
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 mAP
S-F .32 .42 .08 .61 .58 .42 .49 .31 .23 .09 .07 .20 .12 .29 .29 .07 .09 .28
S-VCM .26 .21 .07 .84 .61 .44 .63 .42 .34 .15 .11 .44 .23 .59 .65 .08 .15 .37
(b) Aeroplane
S-F
S-VCM
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 mAP
.77 .84 .89 .91 .94 .92 .94 .91 .91 .56 .53 .15 .40 .75
.91 .95 .98 .96 .96 .96 .97 .96 .97 .73 .69 .19 .50 .83
(c) Bicycle
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 mAP
S-F .69 .46 .76 .67 .66 .57 .54 .70 .68 .25 .17 .22 .53
S-VCM .89 .64 .89 .77 .82 .63 .73 .75 .88 .39 .33 .29 .67
(d) Motorbike
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 mAP
S-F .90 .40 .49 .46 .31 .28 .36 .38 .31 .43
S-VCM .93 .64 .69 .59 .42 .48 .39 .32 .27 .53
(e) Bus
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 mAP
S-F .58 .07 .20 .15 .21 .15 .27 .43 .17 .27 .16 .25 .17 .10 .23
S-VCM .66 .50 .32 .28 .24 .15 .33 .72 .36 .41 .27 .45 .27 .47 .39
(f) Train
Table 2: The AP values for semantic part detection on VehicleSemanticPart dataset for
cars (top), aeroplanes (middle) and bicycle (bottom). We see that visual concepts S-VCm
achieves much higher AP than single filter method S-F. The semantic part names are
provided in the supplementary material.
same semantic part, so combining them may lead to better semantic part
detection.
In this section we address issues (I) and (II), which are closely related,
and leave the issue of combining visual concepts to the next section. We find
that some visual concepts do respond better to more than one semantic part,
in the sense that their AP is higher when we evaluate them for detecting
21
a small subset of semantic parts. More generally, we find that almost all
the visual concepts respond to a small number of semantic parts (one, two,
three, or four) while most of the limited remaining visual concepts appear
to respond to frequently occuring “backgrounds”, such as the sky in the
airplane images.
We proceed as follows. Firstly, for each visual concept we determine
which semantic part it best detects, calculate the AP, and plot the histogram
as shown in Figure 9 (SingleSP). Secondly, we allow each visual concept to
select a small subset – two, three, or four – of semantic parts that it can
detect (penalizing it if it fails to detect all of them). We measure how well
the visual concept detects this subset using AP and plot the same histogram
as before. This generally shows much better performance than before. From
Figure 9 (MultipleSP) we see that the histogram of APs gets shifted greatly
to the right, when taking into account the fact that one visual concept may
correspond to one or more semantic parts. Figure 10 shows the percentage
of how many semantic parts are favored by each visual concept. If a visual
concept responds well to two, or more, semantic parts, this is often because
those parts are visually similar, see Figure 11. For example, the semantic
parts for car windows are visually fairly similar. For some object classes,
particularly aeroplanes and trains, there remain some visual concepts with
low APs even after allowing multiple semantic parts. Our analysis shows that
many of these remaining visual concepts are detecting background (e.g., the
sky for the aeroplane class, and railway tracks or coaches for the train class),
see Figure 12. A few other visual concepts have no obvious interpretation
and are probably due to limitations of the clustering algorithm and the CNN
features.
Our results also imply that there are several visual concepts for each
semantic part. In other work, in preparation, we show that these visual
concepts typically correspond to different subregions of the semantic parts
(with some overlap) and that combining them yields better detectors for all
semantic parts with a mean gain of 0.25 AP.
4.6. Summary of Visual Concepts
This section showed that visual concepts were represented as internal representations of deep networks and could be found either by K-means or by
an alternative method where the visual concepts could be treated as hidden
variables attached to the deep network. The visual concepts were visually
tight, in the sense that image patches assigned to the same visual concept
looked similar. Almost all the visual concepts corresponded to semantic parts
22
1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
Percentage
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0~0.2
0
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
(a) Car
0.1
0~0.2
0
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
SingleSP
MultipleSP
(c) Bus
SingleSP
MultipleSP
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
Percentage
0.7
Percentage
0.8
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0
0~0.2
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
SingleSP
MultipleSP
0.9
0.8
0.5
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
1
1
0.8
0
0~0.2
(b) Aeroplane
1
0.9
SingleSP
MultipleSP
0.9
0.8
Percentage
Percentage
SingleSP
MultipleSP
0.9
0.8
0
Percentage
1
1
SingleSP
MultipleSP
0.9
0.1
0~0.2
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
(e) Bicycle
(d) train
0
0~0.2
0.2~0.4 0.4~0.6 0.6~0.8 0.8~1.0
Average Precision Bin
(f) Motorbike
Figure 9: The histograms of the AP responses for all visual concepts. For “SingleSP”,
we evaluate each visual concept by reporting its AP for its best semantic part (the one
it best detects). Some visual concepts have very low APs when evaluated in this manner.
For “MultipleSP”, we allow each visual concept to detect a small subset of semantic parts
(two, three, or four) and report the AP for the best subset (note, the visual concept is
penalized if it does not detect all of them). The APs rise considerably using the MultipleSP
evaluation, suggesting that some of the visual concepts detect a subset of semantic parts.
The remaining visual concepts with very low APs correspond to the background.
0.6
Car
Aeroplane
Bus
Train
Bicycle
Motorbike
0.5
Percentage
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
1
2
3
4
Number of Favored Semantic Parts for Each Visual Concept
Figure 10: Distribution of number of semantic parts favored by each visual concept for
6 objects. Most visual concepts like one, two, or three semantic parts.
of the objects (one, tow, three, or four), several corresponded to background
regions (e.f., sky), but a few visual concepts could not be interpreted. More
results and analysis can be found in our longer report [40] and the webpage
http://ccvl.jhu.edu/cluster.html.
In particular, we observed that visual concepts significantly outper-
23
Figure 11: This figure shows two examples of visual concepts that correspond to multiple
semantic parts. The first six columns show example patches from that visual concept, and
the last two columns show prototypes from two different corresponding semantic parts.
We see that the visual concept in the first row corresponds to “side window” and “front
window”, and the visual concept in the second row corresponds to “side body and ground”
and “front bumper and ground”. Note that these semantic parts look fairly similar.
Figure 12: The first row shows a visual concept corresponding to sky from the aeroplane
class, and the second and third rows are visual concepts corresponding to railway track
and tree respectively from the train class.
formed single filters for detecting semantic parts, but performed worse than
supervised methods, such as support vector machines (SVMs), which took
the same pool-4 layer features as input. This worse performance was due
to several factors. Firstly, supervised approaches have more information so
they generally tend to do better on discriminative tasks. Secondly, several
visual concepts tended to fire on the same semantic part, though in different locations, suggesting that the visual concepts correspond to subparts of
the semantic part. Thirdly, some visual concepts tended to fire on several
semantic parts, or in neighboring regions.
These findings suggest that visual concepts are suitable as building
blocks for pattern theoretic models. We will evaluate this in the next section
where we construct a simple compositional-voting model which combines
several visual concepts to detect semantic parts.
24
5. Combining Visual Concepts for Detecting Semantic Parts
with Occlusion
The previous section suggests that visual concepts roughly correspond to
object parts/subparts and hence could be used as building blocks for compositional models. To investigate this further we study the precise spatial
relationships between the visual concepts and the semantic parts. Previously
we only studied whether the visual concepts were active within a fixed size
circular window centered on the semantic parts. Our more detailed studies show that visual concepts tend to fire in much more localized positions
relative to the centers of the semantic parts.
This study enables us to develop a compositional voting algorithm where
visual concepts combine together to detect semantic parts. Intuitively the
visual concepts provide evidence for subparts of the semantic parts, taking
into account their spatial relationships, and we can detect the semantic parts
by combining this evidence. The evidence comes both from visual concepts
which overlap with the semantic parts, but also from visual concepts which
lie outside the semantic part but provide contextual evidence for it. For example, a visual concept which responds to a wheel gives contextual evidence
for the semantic part “front window” even though the window is some distance away from the wheel. We must be careful, however, about allowing
contextual evidence because this evidence can be unreliable if there is occlusion. For example, if we fail to detect the wheel of the car (i.e. the evidence
for the wheel is very low) then this should not prevent us from detecting
a car window because the car wheel might be occluded. But conversely, if
can detect the wheel then this should give contextual evidence which helps
detect the window.
A big advantage of our compositional voting approach is that it gives a
flexible and adaptive way to deal with context which is particularly helpful
when there is occlusion, see figure (13). If the evidence for a visual concept
is below a threshold, then the algorithm automatically switches off the visual concept so that it does not supply strong negative evidence. Intuitively
“absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”. This allows a flexible and
adaptive way to include the evidence from visual concepts if it is supportive,
but to automatically switch it off if it is not. We note that humans have this
ability to adapt flexibly to novel stimuli, but computer vision and machine
learning system rarely do since the current paradigm is to train and test algorithms on data which are presume to be drawn from the same underlying
distribution. Our ability to use information flexibly means that our system
is in some cases able to detect a semantic part from context even if the part
25
Figure 13: The goal is to detect semantic parts of the object despite occlusion, but without being trained on the occlusion. Center panel: yellow indicates unoccluded part, blue means partially occluded part, while red means
fully occluded part. Right panel: Visual concepts (the circles) give evidence
for semantic parts. They can be switched off automatically in presence of
occlusion (the red circles) so that only the visual concepts that fire (green
circles) give positive evidence for the presence of the parts. This robustness
to occlusion if characteristic of our compositional model and enables it to
outperform fully supervised deep networks.
itself is completely occluded and, by analyzing which visual concepts have
been switched off, to determine if the semantic part itself is occluded. In
later work, this switching off can be extended to deal with the “explaining
away” phenomena, highlighted by work in cognitive science [15].
5.1. Compositional Voting: detecting Semantic Parts with and
without Occlusion
Our compositional model for detecting semantic parts is illustrated in figure (14). We develop it in the following stages. Firstly, we study the spatial
relations between the visual concepts and the semantic parts in greater detail. In the previous section, we only use spatial relations (e.g., is the visual
concept activated within a window centered on the semantic part, where the
window size and shape was independent of the visual concept or the semantic part). Secondly, we compute the probability distributions of the visual
concept responses depending on whether the semantic part is present or nor.
This enables us to use the log-likelihood ratio of these two distributions as
evidence for the presence of the semantic part. Thirdly, we describe how the
evidence from the visual concepts can be combined to vote for a semantic
part, taking into account the spatial positions of the parts and allowing visual concepts to switch off their evidence if it falls below threshold (to deal
with occlusion).
26
Annotated SP w/ the Best Neighboring VC
1
3
summarization
2
1
42
3 6 7 5
8
Collecting +/- VC Cues for voting SP
Prob. Distributions
%
𝑇",$
+
−
4
quantization
6
+
5
7
loglikelihood
%
𝑇",$
−
8
Neighborhood
Score Function
Figure 14: Illustration of the training phase of one (VCv , SPs ) pair. Only
one negative point is shown in each image (marked in a yellow frame in
the third column), though the negative set is several times larger than the
positive set, see [42] for details.
5.1.1. Modeling the Spatial Relationship between Visual Concepts
and Semantic Parts. We now examine the relationship between visual
concepts and semantic parts by studying the spatial relationship of each
(VCv , SPs ) pair in more detail. Previously we rewarded a visual concept if it
responded in a neighborhood N of a semantic part, but this neighborhood
was fixed and did not depend on the visual concept or the semantic part.
But our observations showed that if a visual concept VCv provides good
evidence to locate a semantic part SPs , then the SPs may only appear at
a restricted set of positions relative to VCv . For example, if VCv represents
the upper part of a wheel, we expect the semantic part (wheel) to appear
slightly below the position of VCv .
Motivated by this, for each (VCv , SPs ) pair we learn a neighborhood
function Nv,s indicating the most likely spatial relationship between VCv
and SPs . This is illustrated in figure (14). To learn the neighborhood we
measured the spatial statistics for each (VCv , SPs ) pair. For each annotated ground-truth position q ∈ Ts+ we computed the position p? in its L4
neighborhood which best activates VCv , i.e. p? = arg minp∈N(q) kf (Ip ) − fv k,
yielding a spatial offset ∆p = p? − q. We normalize these spatial offsets to
yield a spatial frequency map Frv,s (∆p) ∈ [0, 1]. The neighborhood Nv,s is
obtained by thresholding the spatial frequency map. For more details see
[42].
27
5.1.2. Probability Distributions, Supporting Visual Concepts and
Log-likelihood Scores. We use loglikelihood ratio tests to quantify the
evidence a visual concept VCv ∈ V can give for a semantic part SPs ∈ S. For
each SPs , we use the positive and negative samples Ts+ and Ts− to compute
the conditional distributions:
d
+
+
Pr min kf (Ip ) − fv k 6 r | q ∈ Ts ,
(5)
Fv,s (r) =
dr
p∈Nv,s(q)
(6)
F−
v,s (r)
d
−
=
Pr min kf (Ip ) − fv k 6 r | q ∈ Ts .
dr
p∈Nv,s(q)
We call F+
v,s (r) the target distribution, which specifies the probably activity
pattern for VCv if there is a semantic part SPs nearby. If (VCv , SPs ) is a
good pair, then the probability F+
v,s (r) will be peaked close to r = 0, (i.e.,
there will be some feature vectors within Nv,s (q) that cause VCv to activate).
The second distribution, F−
v,s (r) is the reference distribution which specifies
the response of the feature vector if the semantic part is not present.
The evidence is provided by the log-likelihood ratio [1]:
(7)
Λv,s (r) = log
F+
v,s (r) + ε
F−
v,s (r) + ε
,
where ε is a small constant chosen to prevent numerical instability.
In practice, we use a simpler method to first decide which visual concepts
are best suited to detect each semantic part. We prefer (VCv , SPs ) pairs for
which F+
v,s (r) is peaked at small r. This corresponds to visual concepts which
are fairly good detectors for the semantic part and, in particular, those which
have high recall (few false negatives). This can be found from our studies of
the visual concepts described in section (4). For more details see [42]. For
each semantic part we select K visual concepts to vote for it. We report
results for K = 45, but good results can be found with fewer. For K = 20
the performance drops by only 3%, and for K = 10 it drops by 7.8%.
5.2. Combining the Evidence by Voting
The voting process starts by extracting CNN features on the pool-4 layer,
i.e. {fp }) for p ∈ L4 . We compute the log-likelihood evidence Λv,s for each
(VCv , SPs ) at each position p. We threshold this evidence and only keep
those positions which are unlikely to be false negatives. Then the vote that
28
a visual concepts gives for a semantic part is obtained by a weighted sum of
the loglikelihood ratio (the evidence) and the spatial frequency.
The final score which is added to the position p + ∆p is computed as:
(8)
Votev,s (p) = (1 − β) Λv,s (Ip ) + β log
Fr(∆p)
.
U
The first term ensures that there is high evidence of VCv firing, and the
second term acts as the spatial penalty ensuring that this VCv fires in the
right relative position Here we set β = 0.7, and define log Fr(∆p)
= −∞ when
U
Fr(∆p)
= 0, and U is a constant.
U
In order to allow the voting to be robust to occlusion we need this
ability to automatically “switch off” some votes if they are inconsistent with
other votes. Suppose a semantic part is partially occluded. Some of its visual
concepts may still be visible (i.e. unoccluded) and so they will vote correctly
for the semantic part. But some of the visual concepts will be responding
to the occluders and so their votes will be contaminated. So we switch off
votes which fall below a threshold (chosen to be zero) so that failure of a
visual concept to give evidence for a semantic part does not prevent the
semantic part from being detected – i.e. absence of evidence is not evidence
of absence. Hence a visual concept is allowed to support the detection of a
semantic part, but not allowed to inhibit it.
The final score for detecting a semantic part SPs is the sum of the
thresholded votes of its visual concepts:
(9)
Scores (p) =
X
max {0, Votev,s (p)}.
VCv ∈Vs
In practical situations, we will not know the size of the semantic parts
in the image and will have to search over different scales. For details of this
see [42]. Below we report results if the scale is known or unknown.
5.3. Experiments for Semantic Part Detection with and without
Occlusion
We evaluate our compositional voting model using the VehicleSemanticParts
and the VehicleOcclusion datasets. For these experiments we use a tougher,
and more commonly used, evaluation criterion [8], where a detected semantic
part is a true-positive if itsIntersection-over-Union (IoU) ratio between the
groundtruth region (i.e. the 100 × 100 box centered on the semantic part)
29
Unknown Scale
Object S-VCM SVM-VC FR
airplane
10.1
18.2
45.3
bicycle
48.0
58.1
75.9
bus
6.8
26.0
58.9
car
18.4
27.4
66.4
motorbike 10.0
18.6
45.6
train
1.7
7.2
40.7
mean
15.8
25.9
55.5
Known Scale
VT S-VCM SVM-VC
30.6
18.5
25.9
77.8
61.8
73.8
58.1
27.8
39.6
63.4
28.1
37.9
53.4
34.0
43.8
35.5
13.6
21.1
53.1
30.6
40.4
VT
41.1
81.6
60.3
65.8
58.7
51.4
59.8
Table 3: Detection accuracy (mean AP, %) and scale prediction loss without
occlusion. Performance for the deep network FR is not altered by knowing
the scale.
and the predicted region is greater or equal to 0.5, and duplicate detection
is counted as false-positive.
In all experiments our algorithm, denoted as VT, is compared to three
other approaches. The first is single visual concept detection S-VCm (described in the previous section). The others two are baselines: (I) FasterRCNN, denoted by FR, which trains a Faster-RCNN [31] deep network for
each of the six vehicles, where each semantic part of that vehicle is considered to be an “object category”. (II) the Support Vector Machine, denoted
by SVM-VC, used in the previous section. Note that the Faster-RCNN is
much more complex than the alternatives, since it trains an entire deep network, while the others only use the visual concepts plus limited additional
training.
We first assume that the target object is not occluded by any irrelevant
objects. Results of our algorithm and its competitors are summarized in
Table 3. Our voting algorithm achieves comparable detection accuracy to
Faster-RCNN, the state-of-the-art object detector, and outperforms it if
the scale is known. We observe that the best single visual concept S-VCM
performs worse than the support vector machine SVM-VC (consistent with
our results on keypoints), but our voting method VT performs much better
than the support vector machine.
Next, we investigate the case that the target object is partially occluded
using the VehicleOcclusion dataset. The results are shown in Table 4. Observe that accuracy drops significantly as the amount of occlusion increases,
but our compositional voting method VT outperforms the deep network
FR for all levels of occlusion.
Finally we illustrate, in figure (15), that our voting method is able to
detect semantic parts using context, even when the semantic part itself is
30
2 Occluders
0.2 6 r < 0.4
Object
FR
VT
airplane 26.3 23.2
bicycle
63.8 71.7
bus
36.0 31.3
car
32.9 35.9
motorbike 33.1 44.1
train
17.9 21.7
mean
35.0 38.0
3 Occluders
0.4 6 r < 0.6
FR
VT
20.2 19.3
53.8 66.3
27.5 19.3
19.2 23.6
26.5 34.7
10.0
8.4
26.2 28.6
4 Occluders
0.6 6 r < 0.8
FR
VT
15.2 15.1
37.4 54.3
18.2
9.5
11.9 13.8
17.8 24.1
7.7
3.7
18.0 20.1
Table 4: Detection accuracy (mean AP, %) when the object is partially
occluded and the scale is unknown. Three levels of occlusion are considered.
occluded. This is a benefit of our algorithm’s ability to use evidence flexibly
and adaptively.
6. Discussion: Visual Concepts and Sparse Encoding
Our compositional voting model shows that we can use visual concepts to
develop a pattern theoretic models which can outperform deep networks
when tested on occluded images. But this is only the starting point. We now
briefly describes ongoing work where visual concepts can be used to provide
a sparse encoding of objects.
The basic idea is to encode an object in terms of those visual concepts
which have significant response at each pixel. This gives a much more efficient representation than using the high-dimensional feature vectors (typically 256 or 512). To obtain this encoding we threshold the distance between
the feature vectors (at each pixel) and the centers of the visual concepts.
As shown in figure (16) we found that a threshold of Tm = 0.7 ensured
that most pixels of the objects were encoded on average by a single visual
concept.
This means that we can approximately encode a feature vector f by
specifying the visual concept that is closest to it, i.e. by v̂ = arg minv |f − fv |
– provided this distance is less than a threshold Tm . More precisely, we
can encode a pixel p with feature vectors fp by a binary feature vector
bp = (bp1 , ..., bpv , ...) where v indexes the visual concepts and bpv = 1 if |fp −
fv | < Tm and bpv = 0 otherwise. In our neural network implementation, the
bpv correspond to the activity of the vc-neurons (if soft-max is replaced by
hard-max).
31
Object: car
Actual Case: LOW Occlusion
Object: car
Actual Case: LOW Occlusion
Object: car
Actual Case: LOW Occlusion
SP: wheel
Prediction: LOW Occlusion
SP: wheel
Prediction: LOW Occlusion
SP: wheel
Prediction: MOD Occlusion
33 Supporting Visual Concepts
35 Supporting Visual Concepts
22 Supporting Visual Concepts
Average Distance: 14.5703 (Low)
Average Distance: 19.2344 (Low)
Average Distance: 44.4923 (Moderate)
Object: car
Actual Case: HIGH Occlusion Object: car
SP: h-light
Prediction: HIGH Occlusion
SP: h-light
Actual Case: HIGH Occlusion Object: car
Prediction: HIGH Occlusion
SP: h-light
Actual Case: HIGH Occlusion
Prediction: LOW Occlusion
25 Supporting Visual Concepts
22 Supporting Visual Concepts
30 Supporting Visual Concepts
Average Distance: 73.6239 (High)
Average Distance: 75.9826 (High)
Average Distance: 22.1090 (Low)
Figure 15: This figure shows detection from context: when there are occlusions, the cuesmay come from context which is far away from the part
There are several advantages to being able to represent spatial patterns
of activity in terms of sparse encoding by visual concepts. Instead of representing patterns as signals f in the high-dimensional feature space we can
give them a more concise symbolic encoding in terms of visual concepts, or
by thresholding the activity of the vc-neurons. More practically, this leads
to a natural similarity measure between patterns, so that two patterns with
similar encodings are treated as being the same underlying pattern.
This encoding perspective follows the spirit of Barlow’s sparse coding
ideas [3] and is also helpful for developing pattern theory models, which are
pursuing in current research. it makes it more practical to learning generative models of the spatial structure of image patterns of an object or a
semantic part Ss . This is because generating the binary vectors {b} is much
easier than generating high-dimensional feature vectors {f }. ItQ
can be down,
for example, by a simply factorized model P ({bp }|SPs ) = p P (fp |SPs ),
Q
where P (fp |SPs ) = v P (bv,p |SPs ), and bv,p = 1 if the v th vc-neuron (or visual concept) is above threshold at position p. It also yields simple distance
measures between different image patches which enables one-shot/few-shot
32
Figure 16: This figure shows there is a critical threshold Tm , at roughly 0.7,
where most pixels are encoded (i.e. activate) a small number of visual concepts. Below this threshold most pixels have no visual concepts activated.
By contrast, above the threshold three of more visual concepts are activated.
These results are shown for level four features on the cars (left panel), bikes
(center panel) and trains (right panel) in VehicleSemanticPart, and we obtain almost identical plots for the other objects in VehicleSemanticPart.
learning, and also to cluster image patches into different classes, such as into
different objects and different viewpoints.
7. Conclusion
This paper is a first attempt to develop novel visual architectures, inspired
by pattern theory, which are more flexible and adaptive than deep networks
but which build on their successes. We proceeded by studying the activation
patterns of deep networks and extracting visual concepts, which both throws
light on the internal representations of deep networks but which can also
be used as building blocks for compositional models. We also argued that
the complexity of vision, particularly due to occlusions, meant that vision
algorithms should be tested on more challenging datasets, such as those
where occlusion is randomly added, in order to ensure true generalization.
Our studies showed that compositional models outperformed deep networks
when both were trained on unoccluded datasets but tested when occlusion
was present.
We conclude that converting deep networks into compositional models,
with more explicit representations of parts, will lead to more flexible and
adaptive visual architectures than can overcome the limitations of current
deep networks and start approaching the abilities of the human visual system. We hope that this research program will help flesh out the details of
David’s pattern theory [26] in order to both improve its practical performance but also to relate it more closely to biological visual systems [27].
33
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge support from the National Science Foundations
with NSF STC award CCF-1231216 (Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines) and NSF Expedition in Computing award CCF-1317376. We would
also like to acknowledge support from the Office of Naval Research (ONR)
with N00014-15-1-2356.
References
[1] Yali Amit. 2D Object Detection and Recognition: Models, Algorithms,
and Networks. MIT Press, 2002.
[2] David Arthur and Sergei Vassilvitskii. k-means++: The advantages of
careful seeding. In Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, 2007.
[3] Horace B Barlow. Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for
perceptual psychology? Perception, 1(4):371–394, 1972.
[4] David Bollier and Charles M Firestone. The promise and peril of big
data. 2010.
[5] Lo-Bin Chang, Eran Borenstein, Wei Zhang, and Stuart Geman. Maximum likelihood features for generative image models. The Annals of
Applied Statistics, 2017.
[6] Xianjie Chen and Alan L Yuille. Parsing occluded people by flexible
compositions. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2015.
[7] Xianjie Chen, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Xiaobai Liu, Sanja Fidler, Raquel Urtasun, and Alan Yuille. Detect what you can: Detecting and representing
objects using holistic models and body parts. In Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2014.
[8] Mark Everingham, Luc Van Gool, Christopher KI Williams, John Winn,
and Andrew Zisserman. The pascal visual object classes (voc) challenge.
International journal of computer vision, 88(2):303–338, 2010.
[9] Apostolos P Georgopoulos, Andrew B Schwartz, and Ronald E Kettner.
Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science, pages 1416–
1419, 1986.
[10] Ian J Goodfellow, Jonathon Shlens, and Christian Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In International Conference on
Learning Representations, 2015.
34
[11] Ulf Grenander. Elements of pattern theory. JHU Press, 1996.
[12] William Eric Leifur Grimson, Daniel P Huttenlocher, et al. Object
Recognition by Computer: the Role of Geometric Constraints. MIT Press,
1990.
[13] Md Hasnat, Julien Bohné, Jonathan Milgram, Stéphane Gentric, Liming Chen, et al. von mises-fisher mixture model-based deep learning:
Application to face verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04264, 2017.
[14] John Hertz, Anders Krogh, and Richard G Palmer. Introduction to the
theory of neural computation, volume 1. Basic Books, 1991.
[15] Gaetano Kanizsa and Walter Gerbino. Convexity and symmetry in
figure-ground organization. Vision and artifact, pages 25–32, 1976.
[16] Abhishek Kar, Shubham Tulsiani, Joao Carreira, and Jitendra Malik.
Amodal completion and size constancy in natural scenes. In International
Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2015.
[17] Tai Sing Lee and David Mumford. Hierarchical bayesian inference in
the visual cortex. JOSA A, 20(7):1434–1448, 2003.
[18] Ann B Lee, David Mumford, and Jinggang Huang. Occlusion models
for natural images: A statistical study of a scale-invariant dead leaves
model. International Journal of Computer Vision, 41(1):35–59, 2001.
[19] Bastian Leibe, Ales Leonardis, and Bernt Schiele. Combined object
categorization and segmentation with an implicit shape model. In European Conference on Computer Vision workshop on statistical learning in
computer vision. Springer, 2004.
[20] Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. Amodal instance segmentation. In European
Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2016.
[21] Bo Li, Tianfu Wu, and Song-Chun Zhu. Integrating context and occlusion for car detection by hierarchical and-or model. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 2014.
[22] Yao Li, Lingqiao Liu, Chunhua Shen, and Anton van den Hengel. Midlevel deep pattern mining. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
IEEE, 2015.
[23] Renjie Liao, Alexander G. Schwing, Richard S. Zemel, and Raquel Urtasun. Learning deep parsimonious representations. In Advances in Neural
Information Processing Systems, 2016.
35
[24] Subhransu Maji and Jitendra Malik. Object detection using a maxmargin hough transform. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
IEEE, 2009.
[25] Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff
Dean. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
3111–3119, 2013.
[26] David Mumford and Agnès Desolneux. Pattern theory: the stochastic
analysis of real-world signals. CRC Press, 2010.
[27] David Mumford. On the computational architecture of the neocortex.
Biological cybernetics, 66(3):241–251, 1992.
[28] Mark Nitzberg and David Mumford. The 2.1-d sketch. In International
Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 1990.
[29] Ryuzo Okada. Discriminative generalized hough transform for object
dectection. In International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2009.
[30] George Papandreou, Liang-Chieh Chen, and Alan L Yuille. Modeling
image patches with a generic dictionary of mini-epitomes. In Proceedings
of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,
pages 2051–2058, 2014.
[31] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster rcnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks.
In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 91–99, 2015.
[32] Marcel Simon and Erik Rodner. Neural activation constellations: Unsupervised part model discovery with convolutional networks. In International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2015.
[33] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. In International Conference on
Learning Representations, 2015.
[34] Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of
neural networks. In ICLR, 2014.
[35] Kewei Tu and Vasant Honavar. Unambiguity regularization for unsupervised learning of probabilistic grammars. In Proceedings of the 2012
Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1324–1334. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2012.
36
[36] Kewei Tu, Maria Pavlovskaia, and Song-Chun Zhu. Unsupervised structure learning of stochastic and-or grammars. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1322–1330, 2013.
[37] Leslie G Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Communications of the
ACM, 27(11):1134–1142, 1984.
[38] Vladimir N. Vapnik. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory.
Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1995.
[39] Peng Wang and Alan Yuille. Doc: Deep occlusion estimation from a
single image. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 545–
561. Springer, 2016.
[40] Jianyu Wang, Zhishuai Zhang, Cihang Xie, Vittal Premachandran, and
Alan Yuille. Unsupervised learning of object semantic parts from internal
states of cnns by population encoding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06855,
2015.
[41] Feng Wang, Xiang Xiang, Jian Cheng, and Alan L Yuille. Normface: l 2 hypersphere embedding for face verification. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1704.06369, 2017.
[42] Jianyu Wang, Cihang Xie, Zhishuai Zhang, Jun Zhu, Lingxi Xie, and
Alan Yuille. Detecting semantic parts on partially occluded objects. In
British Machine Vision Conference, 2017.
[43] Yu Xiang, Roozbeh Mottaghi, and Silvio Savarese. Beyond pascal: A
benchmark for 3d object detection in the wild. In Winter Conference on
Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE, 2014.
[44] Tianjun Xiao, Yichong Xu, Kuiyuan Yang, Jiaxing Zhang, Yuxin Peng,
and Zheng Zhang. The application of two-level attention models in deep
convolutional neural network for fine-grained image classification. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, 2015.
[45] Cihang Xie, Jianyu Wang, Zhishuai Zhang, Yuyin Zhou, Lingxi Xie, and
Alan Yuille. Adversarial examples for semantic segmentation and object
detection. In International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 2017.
[46] Alan Yuille and Roozbeh Mottaghi. Complexity of representation and
inference in compositional models with part sharing. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(1):292–319, 2016.
[47] Bolei Zhou, Aditya Khosla, Àgata Lapedriza, Aude Oliva, and Antonio
Torralba. Object detectors emerge in deep scene cnns. In International
Conference on Learning Representations Workshop, 2015.
37
[48] Song-Chun Zhu, David Mumford, et al. A stochastic grammar of images, volume 2. Now Publishers, Inc., 2007.
[49] Long Leo Zhu, Chenxi Lin, Haoda Huang, Yuanhao Chen, and Alan
Yuille. Unsupervised structure learning: Hierarchical recursive composition, suspicious coincidence and competitive exclusion. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 759–773. Springer, 2008.
Received December 7, 2012
| 1cs.CV
|
A para-model agent for dynamical systems
arXiv:1202.4707v6 [math.OC] 11 Mar 2018
*** 10 years of model-free control methodology ***
Loı̈c MICHEL
Abstract
Consider a dynamical system u 7→ x, ẋ = fnl (x, u) where fnl is a nonlinear
(convex or nonconvex) function, or a combination of nonlinear functions
that can eventually switch. We present, in this preliminary work1 , a
generalization of the standard model-free control, that can either control
the dynamical system, given an output reference trajectory, or optimize
the dynamical system as a derivative-free optimization based ”extremumseeking” procedure. Multiple applications2 are presented and the robustness of the proposed method is studied in simulation.
1
This work is distributed under CC license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-sa/4.0/. Email of the corresponding author : [email protected]
2
The control of the Epstein frame (described in §3.4) has been experimentally validated and the
results have been presented at the French Symposium of Electrical Engineering in Grenoble, Jun.
2016 http://sge2016.sciencesconf.org/.
Contents
1 Introduction
1
2 General Principle
2.1 Definition of the closed-loop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Definition of the PMA algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Performances in simulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1
2
2
4
3 Applications of the Cπ -control
3.1 Motor control in the dq frame . .
3.2 Control of switched non-minimum
3.3 Ballistic and the fire control . . .
3.4 Control of the HIV-1 model . . .
3.5 Control of the Epstein frame . . .
.
.
.
.
.
6
6
9
16
25
28
4 Derivative-free & ”extremum-seeking” control
4.1 Proposed Cπ -control scheme . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2 Numerical applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
35
35
36
5 Concluding remarks
37
2
. . . . . . . .
and minimum
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
phase systems
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
Introduction
Based on the model-free control methodology, originally proposed by Fliess & Join
[1] [2] [3] ten years ago, which is referred to as a self-tuning controller in [4] and which
has been widely and successfully applied to many mechanical and electrical processes,
the para-model agent (PMA) aims to generalize the model-free control by not only
controlling nonlinear system, but also performing an ”extremum-seeking” control. On
the one hand, we studied the dynamic performances when controlling generic switched
minimum phase, non-minimum phase systems (e.g. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]) as well
as the control of some nonlinear systems taken from applications in physics. On the
other hand, we present how the PMA can be used to find the optimum of some classes
of nonlinear functions. The proposed para-model agent3 is a simple derivation of the
discrete model-free control law [12]. The last progresses result in two contributions:
first, the substitution of the computation of the numerical derivatives in the original
model-free control approach [3], by an initialization function that makes the controller
more robust when stabilizing for example switched processes4 . Then, we propose to
extend the properties of the model-free controller to include the extremum seeking
control of nonlinear systems without any computation of derivative or gradient. In
this case, instead of tracking a working point of nonlinear systems, an appropriate
choice of the output reference may stabilize nonlinear systems to their extremum.
The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the general principle of
the proposed para-model agent. In Section 3, some examples illustrate the control
of generic switched linear systems, the control of a three-phase motor, the control of
a ballistic fire, the control of a biological system and the control of the measure of
magnetic hysteresis in the framework of magnetic materials characterization (this last
application is also referred to as the control of nonlinear switched systems). Section 4
presents how the proposed PMA approach can be used as derivative-free optimization
/ ”extremum-seeking” control.
2
General Principle
We consider a nonlinear SISO dynamical system to control:
ẋ = fnl (x, u)
u 7→ y,
y = Cx
(1)
where fnl is a nonlinear system, the para-model agent is an application (y ∗ , y) 7→ u
whose purpose is to control the output y of (1) following an output reference y ∗ .
3
A justification of the proposed name ”para-model” is given in the note of the conclusion.
The first steps toward the elaboration of the proposed algorithm were to extend the capabilities
of the model-free control regarding the control of switched non-minimum phase systems [13].
4
1
In simulation, the system (1) is controlled in its ”original formulation” without any
modification / linearization.
2.1
Definition of the closed-loop
Consider the control scheme depicted in Fig. 1 where Cπ is the proposed PMA
controller.
Figure 1: Proposed PMA scheme to control or optimize a nonlinear system.
2.2
Definition of the PMA algorithm
For any discrete moment tk , k ∈ N∗ , one defines the discrete controller Cπ such that
symbolically:
Cπ : (y, y ∗ ) 7→ uk =
Z
0
t
R2 → R
i
Ki εk−1 d τ
uk−1 + Kp (kα e−kβ k − yk−1 )
{z
}
|
k−1
(2)
uik
where: y ∗ is the output reference trajectory; Kp and KI are real positive tuning
gains; εk−1 = yk∗ − yk−1 is the tracking error; uik = uik−1 + Kp (kα e−kβ k − yk−1 ) is an
internal recursive term where kα e−kβ k − yk−1 is the associated exponential tracking
error in which kα e−kβ k is an initialization function where kα and kβ are real constants;
practically, the integral part is discretized using e.g. Riemann sums. The internal
recursion5 on uik is defined such as: uik = uik−1 + Kp (kα e−kβ k − yk−1 ).
The set of Cπ -parameters of the controller, that needs to be adjusted by the user, is
defined as the set of coefficients {Kp , Ki , kα , kβ }.
5
We refine the definition of the PMA algorithm, for which we aim to optimize the construction;
in particular, further investigations concern the study of a direct recursion on uk taking into account
the Ki -integration and thus comparing internal recursion (involving uik , uik−1 ) vs external recursion
(involving uk , uik−1 )...
2
Practical algorithm A possible algorithmic implementation of the simple definition (2) is given below (for all ii ∈ N∗ ):
y_int(ii) = k_alpha*exp(-k_beta*ii); % exp. init. function
para_exp_err = y_int(ii-1) - y(ii-1);
% exp. tracking error
para_stand_err(ii) = y_ref(ii) - y(ii-1); % stand. tracking error
para_u(ii) = para_u(ii-1) + Kp*para_exp_err; % internal recursion
para_G(ii) = Kint*para_stand_err(ii);
% def. of the integral part
para_tr(ii) = para_tr(ii-1) + h*(para_G(ii) + para_G(ii-1))/2;
% trapezoidal integration
para_u_output = para_u(ii)*para_tr(ii);
% final product (integrator X internal recursion)
where:
• ii is the index of the sample in the (optional) vectorized process;
• exp is the exponential function;
• para exp err is the exponential tracking error;
• para stand err is the (standard) output tracking error;
• para u is the ”internal” recursion;
• para G constitutes the discrete integrator;
• para u output is the output of the controller that corresponds to the final
product between the discrete integrator and the internal recursive function.
and k alpha, k beta, Kp and Kint are real constants.
Remark The proposed PMA algorithm could been seen as a ”deformed”
integrator
Rt
since the internal recursion uik multiplies directly the integrator 0 Ki εk−1 d τ .
3
2.3
Performances in simulation
2.3.1
Optimization of the closed-loop
Optimizing the performances in simulation means that we want to solve the problem
of finding the most appropriate set of Cπ -parameters relating to the minimization of
some performances index 6 , that may quantify the dynamical performances of the
closed-loop. This problem is thus equivalent to an optimization problem for which
any optimization solver can be a priori used. In particular, meta-heuristic solvers or
derivative-free optimization solvers are preferred due to the pretty complexity of the
closed-loop nonlinear form (in general). We are interested in using the ”Brute Force
Optimization” (BFO) solver [14] that is very convenient and efficient to use. Figure
2 illustrates a closed-loop first order system, whose the controlled transient has been
BFO-optimized in Fig. 3.
Figure 2: Simulation with a set of Cπ -parameters arbitrary fixed to ensure at least
asymptotic stability.
2.3.2
Sobol-based sensibility of the controlled transient
To investigate the interactions between the Cπ -parameters that influence the minimization of the performances index, we propose a preliminary study of the sensibility
of the Cπ -parameters using the Sobol index methodology [15]. Consider a controlled
nonlinear system, for which the ISE index is evaluated under strict conditions w.r.t.
6
The classical performance index that are available are IAE, ISE, ITAE,
and
ITSE.
see
e.g.
(http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/
18674-learning-pid-tuning-iii--performance-index-optimization/content/html/
optimalpidtuning.html) for a quick review (in the context of PID tuning).
4
Figure 3: Simulation with a set of Cπ -parameters BFO-optimized to minimize a transient performance index.
the management of the Cπ -parameters7 , the Sobol-based sensibility is evaluated only
during the initialization / transient of the closed-loop.
Figure 4 shows that a priori the coefficient kβ does not influence the dynamical
performances during the transient.
Figure 4: Sobol-based analysis of the ISE index during the closed-loop initialization.
7
case 1 : the value of the evaluated index is bounded to 100 and a tolerance of ±10% is permitted
on the Cπ -parameters; case 2 : the value of the evaluated index is not bounded and a tolerance of
±50% is permitted on the Cπ -parameters. The results are very similar between the two cases and
the Sobol index for {Kp , Ki , kα , kβ } are respectively {0.3324, 0.3318, 0.3326, 0.0002}.
5
3
3.1
Applications of the Cπ -control
Motor control in the dq frame
Consider a three-phase motor driven in the dq frame; the motor is supplied by a e
voltage source rotating at an ω angular frequency and modeled by a simple RC circuit
with an additional voltage source ed that acts as an (internal) disturbance. Figure
5 depicts the proposed model (a single phase is represented) where P (θ) and P i (θ)
are respectively the Park and the inverse Park transform. The purpose is to control
simultaneously the d and q axis with an a priori unknown disturbance ed considering
also that the angular frequency ω is increasing according to the time.
Figure 5: Model of the motor in the dq frame including an explicit disturbance ed .
The disturbance ed is of the general form:
ed1 = A1 (t) sin(ωd (t)t)
ed2 = A2 (t) sin ωd (t)t −
ed :=
ed3 = A3 (t) sin ωd (t)t +
2π
3
2π
3
(3)
where the amplitude Ai and the angular frequency ωd of each phase i could depend
on the time. The control structure is composed of two Cπ controllers: the d axis
is ”maintained” close to zero (d∗ denotes the output ref. and dmes , the controlled
output) and the q axis tracks a specific reference (q ∗ denotes the output ref. and
qmes , the controlled output).
The following figures illustrate some cases with different ”behavior” of the disturbance ed . Figure 6 presents the most simple case where A1 = A2 = A3 = Cst and
ωd = Cst; in Fig. 7 is considered a time-varying disturbance where A1 = A2 = A3 are
increasing according to the time; in Fig. 8, small variations of amplitudes of A1 , A2
and A3 are considered (symbolically, A1 ∼ A2 ∼ A3 ), and finally, Fig. 9 depicts the
case where ωd is time-varying only over a short period of time.
6
Figure 6: Control in the dq frame with ”simple” disturbance ed .
Figure 7: Control in the dq frame with an increasing amplitude of each component
of ed .
7
Figure 8: Control in the dq frame with variation of amplitude of each component of
ed .
Figure 9: Control in the dq frame with variation of the ωd frequency of ed .
8
3.2
Control of switched non-minimum and minimum phase
systems
Consider the set Σ of stable linear systems such that Σ = {Σi }, i = 1, 2, · · · n, which
are minimum and non-minimum phase systems, and which are considered as unknown
in the sense that no explicit model has been identified for control purposes. Assume
now that for all systems, there exists an integer p = {1, · · · , 8}, called the switching
index, such that during a short time window, we have:
ẋ(t) = Ap x(t) + Bp u(t)
Σp (u 7−→ y) :=
(4)
y = Cp x(t)
where u and y are respectively the input and the output of the system Σp (p is the
switching index). The step responses of these p systems are presented Fig. 10.
Figure 10: Step responses of each system Σi .
Figures 11 12 13 14 present some examples of the application of the Cπ -control under
different arbitrary switching sequences that involve both minimum and non-minimum
phase systems. The first switching time is t1 , the second is t2 and the third is t3 .
Consider now the existence of a delay τ on y that modify (4) such that:
ẋ(t) = Ap x(t) + Bp u(t)
Σp (u 7−→ y) :=
(5)
y = Cp x(t − τ )
This delay can e.g. simulate the propagation delay inside a sensor network. Figures
15 and 16 present two examples of the application of the Cπ -control under different
switching sequences that involve both minimum and non-minimum phase systems.
9
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 11: Switched sequence #1 for t1 = 0.01 s and t2 = 0.05 s.
10
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 12: Switched sequence #2 for t1 = 0.025 s and t2 = 0.072 s.
11
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 13: Switched sequence #3 for t1 = 0.018 s, t2 = 0.035 s and t3 = 0.072 s.
12
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 14: Switched sequence #4 for t1 = 0.35 s, t2 = 0.58 s.
13
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 15: Switched sequence #5 for t1 = 0.015 s, t2 = 0.055 s. An addition of a
time-delay occurs at t = 0.06 s.
14
(a) Step responses of each system Σi .
(b) Controlled switched sequence.
Figure 16: Switched sequence #6 for t1 = 0.025 s, t2 = 0.072 s. An addition of a
time-delay occurs at t = 0.06 s.
15
Discussions
These results have been obtained with a single specific set of the Cπ -parameters; to
improve the tracking performances, one may consider an on-line adjustment of the
Cπ -parameters. Although resonances occur at the instants of switches, the stability
of the control is preserved (regarding the studied cases) when switching from the
different types of systems. In the same manner, a direct tuning of the Cπ -parameters
could damp (ideally, could cancel) the resonant effects.
The presented simulation results show that the proposed control law is robust to
”strong” model variations and in particular when the model is a switching nonminimum phase or minimum phase system that include eventually time-delay. Moreover, the proposed control law seems to have the same properties than the original
model-free control [2] [3] for which its performances have been successfully verified
especially in simulation.
3.3
Ballistic and the fire control
If one fire a projectile at an initial angle and an initial speed, then general physics
allows calculating how far it will travel... but would it be possible to control the initial
speed needed in such manner that the projectile reaches a precise distance? That’s
what we propose to do using the Cπ -control.
3.3.1
Ballistic simplified model
We define first a simple model of the trajectory w(t) = (wx (t), wz (t)) of a projectile
of mass m in the usual frame of reference (Oxz) fired with an initial speed magnitude
v0 that makes a fire angle θ with the horizontal reference i.e. v(t) = v0 cos(θ)ex +
v0 sin(θ)ez . The origin (0, 0) of the frame reference is considered as the initial position
of the projectile.
Denote a the acceleration vector and v the speed vector of the projectile. From
Newton law, considering the action of the gravity g and the air resistance cv2 , we
have:
m
d2 w(t)
= ma = mg − cv2
d t2
(6)
with the initial conditions:
d wx (t)
dt
d wz (t)
dt
= v0 cos θ,
(0,0)
= v0 sin θ
(0,0)
Considering no air resistance i.e. c = 0, (6) is simplified:
16
(7)
m
d wx (t)
=0
dt
(8)
m d wz (t) = −mg
dt
whose solution reads:
wx (t) = v0 cos θ t + cte
(9)
wz (t) = v0 sin θ t − 1 gt2 + cte
2
From (9), the range (or the target) of the projectile xd at z = 0 can be easily
deduced. We have:
d=
3.3.2
2v02 cos θ sin θ
.
g
(10)
Ballistic-fire control methodology
Proposed strategy Consider by hypothesis that a ”virtual” trajectory w∗ of the
projectile hits a target x∗d from an initial speed v0∗ and an initial fire angle θ∗ .
Consider now the ”true” projectile to fire with a trajectory w. To hit the target x∗d
(at z = 0) from a small initial speed vε , one controls the projectile in such manner
that the projectile reaches quickly the initial speed v0∗ and the initial fire angle θ∗
required to hit the specified target x∗d according to (10). During such ”launching”
phase, that we define as the ”launching” distance ∆x0 for which the trajectory of
the projectile is fully controlled, we start from an initial condition that prevents the
projectile to reach its target x∗d i.e. :
d wx (t)
dt
d wz (t)
dt
= vε cos θε ,
(0,0)
= vε sin θε
(11)
(0,0)
where vε < v0∗ and θε ≤ θ∗ are positive resp. initial speed magnitude and fire angle.
Figure 17 illustrates simulation examples of a ”virtual” trajectory (subj. to v0∗ and
θ∗ ) and a ”true” trajectory (subj. to vε and θ∗ ) that is not controlled; the simulations
of the trajectories considering c 6= 0 are presented in Fig. 17(b).
The goal is to accelerate the projectile using a specific mechanical device in such
manner that the references v0∗ and θ∗ are reached quickly. We consider therefore
controlling the trajectory w(t) of the projectile over the launching distance ∆x0 .
17
(a) Case c = 0
(b) Case c = 0 and c 6= 0
Figure 17: Example of comparison of the uncontrolled ”true” projectile (subj. to vε
and θ∗ ) and the ”virtual” trajectory (subj. to v0∗ and θ∗ ), considering c = 0 and c 6= 0.
We took c = 0.05, θε = θ∗ = π/3, v0 = 10 m/s and vε = 9 m/s.
18
Controllable ballistic model
To simulate a controllable model of the trajectory w of the projectile, we consider
adding an external acceleration force in (6) that represents the mechanical action of
the specific mechanical device over the distance ∆x0 . We have:
d2 w(t)
= mg − cv2 + aext
(12)
d t2
ext
where aext (t) = (aext
x (t), az (t)) is equivalent to the external force provided by the
mechanical device. Since such device acts only over ∆x0 , then we assume that aext = 0
for all x > ∆x0 .
m
3.3.3
Implementation of the Cπ -controller
A possible control scheme is to consider controlling the trajectory w that must be
”as close as possible” to the reference w∗ over the distance ∆x0 . Therefore, w is
physically measured and the external acceleration aext is driven by the Cπ -controller,
through the specific mechanical device.
We build a closed-loop that creates a feedback between (2) and (12). We have ”symbolically”, for all x ≤ ∆x0 :
Z t
ext
∗
uk = ak =
Ki (wk−1
− wk−1 )d τ
0
m
uik−1 + Kp (αe−βk − wk−1 )
{z
}
k−1 |
uik
(13)
d2 w(t)
= mg − cv2 + uk
d t2
Determination of the distance ∆x0 ∗
Since we expect that the projectile is fired from ∆x0 with a speed that is very close to
v0∗ (and follows, via the Cπ -control, the same trajectory i.e. w ≈ w∗ over ∆x0 ), then,
we propose a possible definition of the theoretical launching distance ∆x∗0 , (considered
only over the x axis) that corresponds to the solution in wx of:
d wx (t)
= v0∗ x
(14)
dt
Geometrically, the theoretical launching distance ∆x∗0 is associated to the speed vx
that is reached by the projectile (launched with the initial speed vε < v0∗ ) when vx is
close to v0∗ x .
19
3.3.4
Numerical simulations
Case ∆x0 > ∆x0 ∗
Consider the simulated ”virtual” trajectory, presented in Fig. 17, as the control
reference w∗ ; to simplify, we consider θ as constant. Figure 18 presents the case
where the fire is controlled considering c = 0 over ∆x0 = 0.11 m. In particular, Fig.
18(a) presents, at the top, the evolution of the controlled trajectory w in comparison
with the reference w∗ , and, at the bottom, the calculated speed d wx /d t in comparison
with the initial speed v0 cos θ. Figure 18(b) presents the complete ”true” controlled
trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory. Figure 19 presents the same
simulations in the case c 6= 0.
Case ∆x0 ∼ ∆x0 ∗
Consider the simulated ”virtual” trajectory, presented in Fig. 17, as the control
reference w∗ ; to simplify, we consider θ as constant. Figure 20 presents the case
where the fire is controlled considering c = 0 over ∆x∗0 . In particular, Fig. 20(a)
presents, at the top, the evolution of the controlled trajectory w in comparison with
the reference w∗ , and, at the bottom, the calculated speed d wx /d t in comparison
with the initial speed v0 cos θ. Figure 20(b) presents the complete ”true” controlled
trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory. Figure 21 presents the same
simulations in the case c 6= 0.
Discussions
These results have been obtained using the same set of the Cπ -parameters. The
properties of stabilization of the control law, like in the previous case when dealing with switching systems (§3.2) , seem to be preserved and ensure good tracking
performances in particular when considering c = 0 and c 6= 0.
Further generalizations would allow using multiple and parallel Cπ -controllers in
order to control simultaneous physical quantities. In particular, the speed profile v
could be controlled simultaneously with the trajectory w...
20
(a) At the top, controlled trajectory w relating to the reference w∗ ; at the bottom, calculated speed d wx /d t
relating to the initial speed v0 cos θ.
(b) Complete controlled ”true” trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory.
Figure 18: Example of controlled trajectory considering c = 0 over ∆x0 = 0.11 m.
We took θε = θ∗ = π/3, v0 = 10 m/s and vε = 9 m/s.
21
(a) At the top, controlled trajectory w relating to the reference w∗ ; at the bottom, calculated speed
d wx /d t relating to the initial speed v0 cos θ.
(b) Complete controlled ”true” trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory.
Figure 19: Example of controlled trajectory considering c 6= 0 over ∆x0 = 0.11 m.
We took c = 0.05, θε = θ∗ = π/3, v0 = 10 m/s and vε = 9 m/s.
22
(a) At the top, controlled trajectory w relating to the reference w∗ ; at the bottom, calculated speed
d wx /d t relating to the initial speed v0 cos θ.
(b) Complete controlled ”true” trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory.
Figure 20: Example of controlled trajectory considering c = 0 over ∆x∗0 . We took
θε = θ∗ = π/3, v0 = 10 m/s and vε = 9 m/s.
23
(a) At the top, controlled trajectory w relating to the reference w∗ ; at the bottom, calculated speed
d wx /d t relating to the initial speed v0 cos θ.
(b) Complete controlled ”true” trajectory in comparison with the virtual trajectory.
Figure 21: Example of controlled trajectory considering c 6= 0 over ∆x∗0 . We took
c = 0.05, θε = θ∗ = π/3, v0 = 10 m/s and vε = 9 m/s.
24
3.4
Control of the HIV-1 model
The problem is to control the predator-prey like model that describes the evolution
of the HIV-1 when subjected to an external ”medical agent”. From a mathematical
point of view, we study the possibility of controlling the model (15) for which the
purpose is to control the output y (corresponding to the viral load) using the double
inputs u1 and u2 in such manner that y converges rapidly to zero 8 [16] [17].
ẋ1 = s − dx1 − (1 − u1 )βx1 x3
ẋ2 = (1 − u1 )βx1 x3 − µx2
(15)
ẋ3 = (1 − u2 )kx
2 − cx3
y= 0 0 γ x
where (mathematically) : d = 0.02, k = 100, s = 10, β = 2.4.10−5 , µ = 0.24, c = 2.4.
γ is a scaling factor that allows normalizing the output. Figure 22 presents the
evolution of the output y in open-loop when u1 = u2 = 0 i.e. when no medical drug
is considered. Figures 23 and 24 illustrate the control of y considering two different
ratios between u1 and u2 .
Figure 22: Transient response of y considering u1 = u2 = 0.
8
Since we are trying to control this model only from the mathematical point of view, we do not
take into account the constraints that are medically imposed.
25
(a) Output y
(b) Input u
Figure 23: Controlled output y (viral load) in correspondence with u1 = u2 = u.
26
(a) Output y
(b) Input u
Figure 24: Controlled output y (viral load) in correspondence with u1 = u2 = 12 u.
27
3.5
Control of the Epstein frame
The Epstein frame (see Fig. 25 9 ) aims to characterize a magnetic material by determining its B − H hysteresis curve. The principle is to create a magnetic field H
inside the material using a ”magnetizing” current iH . The material gives a response
to the field H that physically corresponds to the measurable magnetic induction field
B. This B field creates a voltage vB through magnetic induction and the quantities
vB and iH is a representation of the magnetic hysteresis curve B − H. To describe
experimentally the major B − H hysteresis loop, the material under study has to
be magnetized using a current iH that is alternative and of enough magnitude in
order to describe the magnetic behavior at saturation. The purpose of the control law
implementation is to control iH such that the output voltage of the Epstein frame vB
remains ”as close as possible” to a desired reference waveform.
Figure 25: An experimental Epstein frame to characterize magnetic materials.
3.5.1
Epstein frame control
Proposed Cπ -control scheme Consider the control scheme depicted in Fig. 26
where Cπ is the proposed PMA controller. Kin and Kout are positive real gains.
Denote fBH the numerical Jiles-Atherton model that is associated to the magnetic
hysteresis B − H and fJA is the complete hysteresis to control.
9
Picture taken from Wikipdia http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/51/
Epstein_frame.jpg.
28
Figure 26: Proposed PMA scheme to control the electrical waveforms measured from
a magnetic hysteresis.
Jiles-Atherton based hysteresis model The Jiles-Atherton model [18] describes
a magnetic hysteresis cycle B − H. It reads:
1
Man − M
c d Man
dM
=
+
dH
1 + c δk − α(Man − M ) 1 + c d H
(16)
where c, δk, Man , α are physical coefficients well identified from magnetic hysteresis
measurement and we assume that the current iH corresponds to the magnetization H
i.e. iH ∝ H and the voltage vB corresponds to the derivative of the magnetic induction
field response B = µ0 H + JBH (H) (where JBH describes the B − H hysteresis via
(16)).
Simplified model of the Epstein frame The Epstein frame admits a complex
model based on the Jiles-Atherton model that represents all electric phenomena that
occur inside the Epstein frame10 . To simplify the model of the Epstein frame to
control, we consider controlling a nonlinear function fJA , which represents a modified
Jiles-Atherton model. Denote vH = fJA (iH ) the nonlinear dynamical system that
describes the B − H hysteresis as a function of iH , and consider controlling directly
the hysteresis cycle in such manner that Cπ controls iH in order to get vH = fJA (iH )
as close as possible to a reference waveform.
To define the global fJA hysteresis function that is controlled by Cπ , which includes
the scaling coefficients needed by the Cπ corrector, consider iH = Kin u, y = Kout vH
and a coefficient Ke such that:
y = fJA (u) = Kin Ke u + Kout JBH (Kin u).
10
(17)
The Epstein frame is equivalent to a transformer and the ”mutual interactions” between primary
and secondary coils must be taken into account in addition to the hysteresis behavior.
29
The small coefficient Ke # 10−4 compensates the very small variations of fBH when
B is close to Bsat . Such variations may induce time-delays in the response of the
Cπ -controller that induce some distortions of the output signal y. The model (17)
could be seen as an ”affine” derivation of the original Jiles-Atherton model.
The B − H loops, obtained from the Jiles-Atherton model, are depicted in Fig. 27
considering the frequencies 5 Hz, 50 Hz, 500 Hz, 1 kHz and 10 kHz. Since this hysteresis model does not allow H > Hmax , a limitation is necessary to bound the evolution
of H, that may occur eventually during the transient of the dynamic stabilization of
the control loop (ex. in Fig. 31).
.
Figure 27: Simulation of the Jiles-Atherton model for different operating frequencies.
3.5.2
Simulation results
Figures 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32 depict the input u and the (rescaled) output y of the
control loop according to the time. Given a particular operating frequency, for which
a particular H − B hysteresis is studied (see Fig. 27), and assuming that the output
reference y ∗ is a sinusoid, whose magnitude corresponds to the theoretical Hmax of
the H − B hysteresis, different frequencies are considered (5 Hz, 50 Hz, 500 Hz,
1 kHz and 10 kHz) in order to highlight the behavior of the controlled voltage vb
when the frequency changes. In particular, high frequencies (e.g. Figures 31 and 32)
introduce an important transient response on y due to the fact that the variations
of y ∗ are too fast to get an immediate stabilization to the dynamic working point
of the hysteresis. The simulation show that the Cπ -controller gives very interesting
30
dynamic performances over a wide range of dynamic working points relating to the
operating frequency. An optimization algorithm (see §2.3) has been used to adjust the
parameters of the Cπ -controller in such manner that the shape of the output response
y is ”as close to” a sine shape11 .
Remarks This hysteresis model is composed of three subsystems (the first magnetization branch, the increasing and decreasing branches) that switch depending on
the value of dH/dt. When H << Hmax , the switch between the branches may not be
smooth and such ”connection” may induce a small transient on y. An illustration is
presented in Fig. 33 at a low frequency in comparison with Fig. 30.
The closed-loop has been also tested using a triangular shaped output reference
y ∗ . Figure 34 depicts the magnitude of the magnetic field H and the corresponding
(rescaled) magnetic induction B during the control loop process according to the time.
The frequency of 5 Hz has been considered as an example holding the parameters of
the simulation with the sine reference at 5 Hz.
Figure 28: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 5 Hz.
11
Remember that the purpose of the optimization procedure is to minimize the tracking error
y − y in such manner that ideally y ≡ y ∗ for the particular sine output reference y ∗ .
∗
31
Figure 29: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 50 Hz.
Figure 30: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 500 Hz.
32
Figure 31: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 1 kHz.
Figure 32: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 10 kHz.
33
Figure 33: Simulated u and y signals according to the time at 500 Hz (H << Hmax ).
Figure 34: Simulated H and y signals according to the time at 5 Hz.
34
4
Derivative-free & ”extremum-seeking” control
To describe how the PMA could be used as a derivative-free optimization (DFO)
algorithm (e.g. [19] [20]) or as an ”extremum-seeking” (ES) control scheme (e.g. [21]
[22] [23]), we first define each element of the associated control scheme and then, we
derive the operating conditions that would allow to minimize nonlinear functions. We
assume that it is possible to derive a control scheme such that the PMA can be used
to minimize nonlinear functions.
4.1
Proposed Cπ -control scheme
Definition of the closed loop Consider the control scheme depicted in Fig. 35
where Cπ is the proposed PMA ”extremum-seeking” controller. Kin and Kout are
s
positive real gains. We consider either a static nonlinear function fnl
(regarding
DFO), which does not have any internal dynamical properties, or a nonlinear SISO
dynamical system (1) (regarding ES), to minimize. The function Q is e.g. a basic
first order transfer function.
Figure 35: Proposed PMA scheme to minimize a nonlinear function fnl .
Function to control
s
• Define the fnl
static function to optimize such that:
s
fnl
:
Rn → R
u0 7→ y
or consider a nonlinear SISO dynamical system (1).
35
(18)
This function represents the ”nonlinear optimization problem”. Currently, the
assumption n ≤ 2 is considered and we denote u0x the input variable for n = 1.
• Q is a standard linear transfer function (typically of first order), such that:
R→R
0
Q : du
dt
+ γ u0 |k = uk
(19)
k
where γ is a time-constant, chosen in such manner that the step response of Q
s
in order to
is very fast. As presented in the Fig. 35, Q is associated with fnl
s
to control.
provide some minimal dynamical properties regarding the system fnl
Obviously, the Q function is not necessary when fnl is already a dynamical
function like (1)12 .
A single Cπ -controller13 drives a single input of fnl (eventually through Q), as
presented in Fig. 35.
4.2
Numerical applications
Since the PMA is designed for nonlinear systems and does not contain any derivatives,
it is assumed that the ”extremum-seeking” control is possible considering a specific
definition of y ∗ in order to reach and stabilize fnl to its minimum.
Let us assume that the following (eventually constrained) minimization problem
(described for a single variable):
min fnl (x),
x∈R
(x = u0 identically inside the control scheme)
(20)
is equivalent to the control scheme described in Fig. 35, for which the output reference
y ∗ ”follows” the minimum value of fnl . We denote x = xopt the value that gives the
minimum of fnl .
Results For each case in 1D, are plotted: the difference between two iterations
yk , yk−1 and the error between xopt and the evolution of x through the closed-loop. In
these cases, all the parameters of Cπ have been set experimentally to give interesting
performances but are not optimal (the choice of the y ∗ function may influence the
speed of the convergence). The following numerical cases are studied:
12
Last investigations suggest that the linear transfer function Q may be not necessary even for
s
a fnl
function to control. The properties of the para-model algorithm are currently under study
considering nonlinear systems that are ”non-dynamical”.
13
To extend this scheme to multi-input variables (n > 2) of fnl , one may consider the use of a
Cπ -controller per input variable.
36
• See Fig. 36 regarding the minimization of a 1D convex function such that:
min (x − 30)2
x
(21)
• See Fig. 37 regarding the minimization of a 1D convex function with a minimum
that changes according to the time at an unknown instant t1 such that:
t ?
1
min (x − 30)2 →
min(x − 40)2
x
x
(22)
• See Fig. 38 regarding the minimization of a 1D non convex function such that:
min 10(1.5 cos(x) − x) + exp(x − 5) + 100 subj. to : y ≥ 15x − 60
x,y
5
(23)
Concluding remarks
We presented how the proposed para-model agent14 , as a model-free and derivativefree based controller, can be used to control nonlinear systems or perform optimization
/ ”extremum-seeking” control. Further investigations include extensive tests and
applications to complex systems as well as a complete study of the stability.
Acknowledgement
The author is sincerely grateful to Dr. Edouard Thomas for his strong guidance and
his valuable comments that improved this paper. The author is also sincerely grateful
to Olivier Ghibaudo, Ph.D. student at G2Elab-CNRS (Grenoble) France, for having
worked on the numerical version of the hysteresis model.
14
Why ”para-model”? Based on the ”model-free” methodology, for which the model is not correlated to the controller in the sense that the controller does not need an explicit definition of the
model to be parametrized and can thus rebuild an ultra-local model from measurements, we propose
the prefix ”para” to highlight the fact that the agent is ”in close proximity” to the model of the
process that he controls. Although no specific information is needed for the PMA control part, some
basic information may be needed to configure properly the PMA and the output reference y ∗ in
the case of extremum-seeking control approach. The stability study is an essential part that should
formalize the proposed PMA approach in order to justify theoretically the operating conditions of
the Cπ -control.
37
Figure 36: min (x − 30)2 (initial condition in red spot).
x
t ?
1
Figure 37: min fnl2 = (x − 30)2 →
min fnl1 = (x − 40)2 (initial condition in red spot).
x
x
38
Figure 38: min 10(1.5 cos(x) − x) + exp(x − 5) + 100 subj. to : y ≥ 15x − 60 (inix,y
tial condition in red spot).
References
[1] M. Fliess, C. Join, M. Mboup and H. Sira-Ramirez, ”Vers une commande multivariable sans modèle”, Conférence internationale francophone d’automatique
(CIFA 2006), France, 2006. (available in french at https://arxiv.org/pdf/math/
0603155.pdf).
[2] M. Fliess and C. Join, ”Commande sans modèle et commande à modèle restreint”, e-STA, vol. 5 (n◦ 4), pp. 1-23, 2008 (available at http://hal.inria.
fr/inria-00288107/en/).
[3] M. Fliess and C. Join, ”Model-free control”, International Journal of Control, vol.
86, issue 12, pp. 2228-2252, Jul. 2013 (available at http://arxiv.org/pdf/1305.
7085.pdf).
[4] K.J. Åström and P.R. Kumar, ”Control: A perspective”, Automatica, vol. 50, issue 1, pp. 3-43, Jan. 2014 (available at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
article/pii/S0005109813005037).
[5] K. J. Åström, ”Direct methods for nonminimum phase systems”, in 19th IEEE
Conference on Decision and Control including the Symposium on Adaptive Processes, vol.19, pp.611-615, Dec. 1980.
39
[6] A. Isidori, ”A tool for semi-global stabilization of uncertain non-minimum-phase
nonlinear systems via output feedback”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control,
vol.45, no.10, pp. 1817-1827, Oct. 2000.
[7] N. Wang, W. Xu and F. Chen, ”Adaptive global output feedback stabilisation of
some non-minimum phase nonlinear uncertain systems”, IET Control Theory &
Applications, vol.2, no.2, pp.117-125, Feb. 2008.
[8] M. Benosman, F. Liao, K.-Y. Lum and J. Liang Wang, ”Nonlinear Control Allocation for Non-Minimum Phase Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems
Technology, vol.17, no.2, pp.394-404, Mar. 2009.
[9] R. Gurumoorthy and S.R. Sanders, ”Controlling Non-Minimum Phase Nonlinear
Systems - The Inverted Pendulum on a Cart Example”, 1993 American Control
Conference, pp.680-685, June 1993.
[10] D. Karagiannis, Z.P. Jiang, R. Ortega and A. Astolfi, ”Output-feedback stabilization of a class of uncertain non-minimum-phase nonlinear systems”, Automatica,
vol. 41, Issue 9, September 2005.
[11] I. Barkana, ”Classical and simple adaptive control for nonminimum phase autopilot design”, Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, vol. 28, Issue: 4, pp.
631-638, 2005.
[12] L. Michel, C. Join, M. Fliess, P. Sicard and A. Chriti, ”Model-free control
of dc/dc converter”, in 2010 IEEE 12th Workshop on Control and Modeling
for Power Electronics, pp.1-8, June 2010 (available at http://hal.inria.fr/
inria-00495776/).
[13] L. Michel, ”Model-free control of non-minimum phase systems and switched
systems”, preprint arXiv, 2011 (available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.1697).
[14] M. Porcelli and Ph. L. Toint, BFO, ”A trainable derivative-free Brute Force
Optimizer for nonlinear bound-constrained optimization and equilibrium computations with continuous and discrete variables”, Namur Center for Complex Systems, In Support, Tech. Reports, no. naXys-06-2015, Belgium, Jul. 2015 (available
at http://www.optimization-online.org/DB_FILE/2015/07/4986.pdf).
[15] F. Cannavó, ”Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment
and model selection”, Computers & Geosciences, vol. 44, pp. 52-59, Jul. 2012.
[16] M. Barão and J.M. Lemos, ”Nonlinear control of HIV-1 infection with a singular
perturbation model”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 2, issue 3, pp.
248-257, Jul. 2007.
40
[17] I. K. Craig, X. Xia and J. W. Venter, ”Introducing HIV/AIDS education into the
electrical engineering curriculum at the University of Pretoria,” IEEE Transactions
on Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 65-73, Feb. 2004.
[18] D. C. Jiles and D. L. Atherton, ”Theory of ferromagnetic hysteresis”, J. Appl.
Phys. 55, 2115 (1984).
[19] A.R. Conn, K. Scheinberg and L.N. Vicente, ”Introduction to Derivative-Free
Optimization”, SIAM Publications (Philadelphia), 2009.
[20] L. M. Rios and N. V. Sahinidis, ”Derivative-free optimization: a review of algorithms and comparison of software implementations”, Journal of Global Optimization, Volume 56, Issue 3, pp 1247-1293, Jul. 2013 (available at http:
//link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10898-012-9951-y).
[21] K. B. Ariyur and M. Krstic, ”Real-Time Optimization by Extremum-Seeking
Control”, Wiley, 2003.
[22] Y. Tan, W.H. Moase, C. Manzie, D. Nesic and I.M.Y. Mareels, ”Extremum Seeking From 1922 To 2010”, 2010 29th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp.14,26,
29-31 Jul. 2010.
[23] A. O. Vweza, K. To Chong and D. J. Lee, ”Gradient-free numerical optimizationbased extremum seeking control for multiagent systems”, International Journal of
Control, Automation and Systems, May 2015.
41
| 3cs.SY
|
1
Location-Aided Coordinated Analog Precoding
for Uplink Multi-User Millimeter Wave Systems
Flavio Maschietti‡ , David Gesbert‡ , Paul de Kerret‡
arXiv:1711.03031v1 [eess.SP] 8 Nov 2017
‡
Communication Systems Department, EURECOM, Sophia-Antipolis, France
Email: {flavio.maschietti, david.gesbert, paul.dekerret}@eurecom.fr
Abstract
Millimeter wave (mmWave) communication is expected to have an important role in next generation
cellular networks, aiming to cope with the bandwidth shortage affecting conventional wireless carriers.
Using side-information has been proposed as a potential approach to accelerate beam selection in
mmWave massive MIMO (m-MIMO) communications. However, in practice, such information is not
error-free, leading to performance degradation. In the multi-user case, a wrong beam choice might result
in irreducible inter-user interference at the base station (BS) side. In this paper, we consider locationaided precoder design in a mmWave uplink scenario with multiple users (UEs). Assuming the existence
of direct device-to-device (D2D) links, we propose a decentralized coordination mechanism for robust
fast beam selection. The algorithm allows for improved treatment of interference at the BS side and in
turn leads to greater spectral efficiencies.
I. I NTRODUCTION
The large bandwidths available at mmWave carrier frequencies are expected to help meet the
throughput requirements for future mobile networks [1]. Since smaller wavelength signals are
more prone to absorption, mmWave communications require beamforming in order to guarantee
appropriate link margins and coverage [2], [3]. To this end, m-MIMO techniques [4] are envisioned as high-gain directional antennas with small form factor can be designed for mmWave
usage [5]. However, configuring those massive antennas to operate with large bandwidths entails
an additional effort. The high cost and power consumption of the radio components impact on
the UEs and small BSs, thus limiting the practical implementation of a fully-digital beamforming
architecture [1]. Moreover, the large number of antennas at both ends of the radio links would
require unfeasible CSI-training overhead to design the precoders.
2
One step towards simplification consists in replacing the fully-digital architecture with a hybrid
analog-digital one [6]–[11]. In mixed analog-digital architectures, a low-dimensional digital
processor is concatenated with an RF analog beamformer, implemented through phase shifters.
Note that while the latter is sufficient to achieve a good part of the overall beamforming gain
– through beam steering towards desired spatial directions – the digital stage is essential when
processing multiple streams and users.
Interestingly, existing works on hybrid architectures typically ignore multi-user interference
issues in the analog domain and cope with them in the digital part. For instance, in [12], a
procedure is proposed for the downlink transmission, where the analog stage is intended to find
the best beam directions for each UE (regardless of multi-user interference), while the digital
one applies the conventional Zero-Forcing (ZF) beamformer on the resulting effective channel.
The strength of this approach lies in the fact that it is possible to use the existing beam training
algorithms for single-user links – such as [13]–[15] – in the analog stage. Such algorithms have
been developed bearing in mind the need for fast link establishment in low-latency applications.
Nevertheless, the reduced number of digital chains might not always allow to resolve the residual
multi-user interference which remains after the analog beamforming stage. In particular, in a
mmWave propagation scenario [2], [3], multiple closely located UEs will likely share some
common reflectors, causing an alignment of the main path’s angles of arrival at the BS receiver
and preventing it from resolving the interference, even at the digital decoding stage.
To solve this problem, a principal idea consists in treating interference before it takes place,
i.e. the UE side, as is done for example in [16], [17]. Although showing significant performance
advantages over the existing solutions, these works assume perfect CSIR for analog beamforming
and single-antenna UEs, which might not be realistic in all mmWave contexts [12].
Rather, we are interested in statistically-driven analog beamforming at the UE TX side. In
this paper, we point out that simple analog UE beam selection can be designed so as to enable
the analog receive beam on the BS side to discriminate for interference. We propose to do
this through the help of low-rate side-information at the UEs. Several works can be found in
the mmWave literature, where side-information is exploited to improve performance without
burdening overhead. Side-information can be obtained from various sources, such as automotive
sensors [18], UHF band [19], GNSS [20], or also past multipath fingerprints measurements [21].
We bring forward the idea that position-based side-information can be exploited in order to
develop a coordination mechanism between the UEs, so that the interference at the BS side can
3
be treated efficiently through both the analog and digital parts of the receiver, as opposed to
relying on the digital part alone. The main intuition is to use coordination to make sure the
selected analog beams at the BS convey the full rank of multi-user channels towards the digital
part to preserve invertibility.
As in some previous work [22], we are interested in establishing a robust form of coordination
which accounts for possible noise in the positioning information made available to the UEs.
However, [22] targets a single-user scenario only. In the multi-user scenario, the lack of a realtime communication channel prevents the UEs from exchanging instantaneous CSI. We consider,
instead, the existence of a low-rate unidirectional D2D channel, allowing communication of
GPS-type data. In particular, we consider a hierarchical set-up where higher ranked UEs receive
position information from lower ranked ones. The unidirectional aspect and the limitation to
position information exchange help keep the D2D overhead much lower than real-time D2D.
Our main contributions read as follows:
•
We formulate the problem of per-user analog precoding with side position information and
recast it as a decentralized beam selection problem.
•
Our algorithm exploits the hierarchical structure of the information, in order to perform
robust (with respect to position data noise) interference mitigation at both analog and digital
stages.
•
Under the proposed method, the UEs coordinate to select beams which, while being suboptimal in terms of average power, help attain the full rank condition needed at the BS for
interference suppression.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
Consider the single-cell uplink multi-user mmWave scenario in Fig. 1. The BS is equipped
with NBS 1 antennas to support K UEs with NUE 1 antennas each. The UEs are assumed to
reside in a disk of a given radius rcl , which will be used to control inter-UE average distance. Each
UE sends one data stream to the BS. We assume that the BS has NRF = K RF chains available,
each one connected to all the NBS antennas, assuming a fully-connected hybrid architecture [1].
The u-th UE precodes the data su ∈ C through the analog precoding vector vu ∈ CNUE ×1 .
We assume that the UEs have one RF chain each, i.e. UEs are limited to analog beamforming
via phase shifters (constant-magnitude elements) [7]. In addition, E[kvu su k2 ] ≤ 1, assuming
normalized power constraints.
4
The reconstructed signal after mixed analog/digital combining at the BS can be expressed as
follows – assuming no timing and carrier mismatches:
x̂ =
K
X
H
H
WD WRF
Hu vu su + WD WRF
n
(1)
u=1
u
NBS ×NUE
where H ∈ C
is the channel matrix from the u-th UE to the BS and n ∈ CNBS ×1 is
the thermal noise vector, with zero mean and covariance matrix σn2 INBS . WRF ∈ CNBS ×NRF is,
instead, the analog combining matrix, containing the vectors relative to each of the K RF chains
(subject to the same hardware constraints as described above), while WD ∈ CK×NRF denotes the
digital combining matrix.
The received SINR for the u-th UE at the BS is expressed as follows:
H
|wDu WRF
Hu vu |2
γu = P
u
H
2
w w 2
w6=u |wD WRF H v | + σñ
(2)
where wDu ∈ C1×NRF denotes the row of WD related to the u-th UE (one RF chain for each UE),
H
n for the filtered thermal noise.
and where we used the short-hand notation ñ = WD WRF
BS
UE 1
rcl
UE 2
Fig. 1: Scenario example with L = 3 propagation paths, two reflectors, and K = 2 UEs. The UEs
are assumed to reside in a disk of radius rcl , which is relatively common in realistic scenarios,
e.g. dense UE distribution in a coffee house. In this illustration, two closely located UEs are
sharing some reflectors, and paths reflecting on the top reflector arrive quasi-aligned at the BS
while originating from distinct UEs.
5
A. Channel Model
Unlike the conventional UHF band propagation environment, the mmWave one does not exhibit
rich-scattering [2] and is in fact modeled as a geometric channel with a limited number of
dominant propagation paths which survive high attenuation. The UE u is thus subject to the
channel matrix Hu ∈ CNBS ×NUE , expressed as the sum of L components or contributions [7]:
Hu = NBS NUE
L
1/2 X
α`u aBS (ϑu` )aHUE (φu` )
(3)
`=1
where
α`u
∼
CN (0, (σ`u )2 )
denotes the complex gain for the `-th path of the u-th UE. Furthermore,
we assume that the variances (σ`u )2 , ` ∈ {1, . . . , L}; u ∈ {1, . . . , K} of the paths are such as
P u 2
` (σ` ) = 1, ∀u ∈ {1, . . . , K}.
The variables φu` ∈ [0, 2π) and ϑu` ∈ [0, 2π) are the angles of departure (AoDs) and arrival
(AoAs) for each contribution, for a given UE u, where one angle pair corresponds to the LoS
direction while other might account for the presence of strong reflectors (e.g. buildings, hills)
in the environment. The positions of those points of reflection depend on the position of the
considered UE (see Fig. 1). We will denote the reflecting points for the u-th UE with Rui , i ∈
{1, . . . , L − 1} in the rest of the paper.
The vectors aUE (φu` ) ∈ CNUE ×1 and aBS (ϑu` ) ∈ CNBS ×1 denote the antenna steering vectors at
the u-th UE and the BS for the corresponding AoDs φu` and AoAs ϑu` , respectively.
We assume to use ULAs at both sides, so that [23]:
h
iT
1
−iπ cos(φ)
−iπ(NUE −1) cos(φ)
aUE (φ) =
1, e
,...,e
(NUE )1/2
h
iT
1
−iπ cos(ϑ)
−iπ(NBS −1) cos(ϑ)
aBS (ϑ) =
1,
e
,
.
.
.
,
e
1/
(NBS ) 2
(4)
(5)
B. Codebooks for Analog Beams
The most recognized method to implement the analog beamformer is through a network of
digitally-controlled phase shifters [24] (refer to [1] for alternative architectures). Thus, the phase
of each element of the analog beamformer is limited to fixed quantized values, and therefore,
the beamforming vectors need to be selected from a finite set (or codebook). We denote the
codebooks used for analog beamforming as:
VUE = {v1 , . . . , vMUE },
VBS = {w1 , . . . , wMBS }
where VUE is assumed to be shared between all the UEs, to ease the notation.
(6)
6
For ULAs, a suitable design for the fixed beamforming vectors in the codebook consists in
selecting steering vectors over a discrete grid of angles [12], [14]:
vp = aUE (φ̄p ),
p ∈ {1, . . . , MUE }
(7)
wq = aBS (ϑ̄q ),
q ∈ {1, . . . , MBS }
(8)
where the angles φ̄p , ∀p ∈ {1, . . . , MUE } and ϑ̄q , ∀q ∈ {1, . . . , MBS } can be chosen according
to different strategies, including regular and non-regular sampling of the [0, π] range [22].
Remark 1. Given the one-to-one correspondence between the beamforming vectors in VBS (resp.
VUE ), and the grid angles ϑ̄q , ∀q ∈ {1, . . . , MBS } (resp. φ̄p , ∀p ∈ {1, . . . , MUE }), we will make
the abuse of notation q ∈ VBS (resp. p ∈ VUE ) to denote the vector wq ∈ VBS (resp. vp ∈ VUE ).
III. I NFORMATION M ODEL
In this section, we describe the structure of the channel state- and side-information available
at both UEs and BS sides. We start with defining the nature of information in an ideal setting
before turning to a realistic (noisy) case.
Definition 1. The average beam gain matrix Gu ∈ RMBS ×MUE contains the power level associated
with each combined choice of analog beam pair between the BS and the u-th UE after averaging
over small scale fading. It is defined as:
Guq,p
=E
αu
h
2
wqH Hu vp
i
(9)
where the expectation is carried out over the channel coefficients αu = [α1u , α2u , . . . , αLu ] and
with Guq,p denoting the (q, p)-element of Gu .
Definition 2. The position matrix Pu ∈ R2×(L+1) contains the two-dimensional location coordinates pun = [punx
puny ]T for node n, where n indifferently refers to either the BS, the u-th UE
or one of the reflectors Rui , i ∈ {1, . . . , L − 1}. It is defined as follows:
h
i
Pu = puBS puR1 . . . puRL−1 puUE
(10)
We will denote as P the set containing all the position matrices Pu , ∀u ∈ {1, . . . , K}.
As shown in [22], the matrix Gu can be expressed as a function of the matrix Pu . We recall
here the deterministic relationship that is found between those two matrices.
7
Lemma 1. We can write the average beam gain matrix relative to the u-th UE as follows:
Guq,p (Pu )
L
X
=
(σ`u )2 |LBS (∆u`,q )|2 |LUE (∆u`,p )|2
(11)
`=1
where we remind the reader that
(σ`u )2
denotes the variance of the channel coefficients α`u and
we have defined:
u
LUE (∆u`,p )
ei(π/2)∆`,p sin((π/2)NUE ∆u`,p )
=
u
(NUE )1/2 ei(π/2)NUE ∆`,p sin((π/2)∆u`,p )
LBS (∆u`,q )
ei(π/2)∆`,q sin((π/2)NBS ∆u`,q )
=
u
(NBS )1/2 ei(π/2)NBS ∆`,q sin((π/2)∆u`,q )
1
1
(12)
u
(13)
and
∆u`,p = (cos(φ̄p ) − cos(φu` ))
(14)
∆u`,q = (cos(ϑu` ) − cos(ϑ̄q ))
(15)
with the angles φu` , ` ∈ {1, . . . , L} and ϑu` , ` ∈ {1, . . . , L} obtained from the position matrix Pu
through simple algebra (refer to [22] for more details).
A. Distributed Noisy Information Model
In the distributed model, each UE u receives its own estimates of the position matrices
Pw , ∀w ∈ {1, . . . , K}. We will use the superscript with parenthesis (u) to denote any information
known at the u-th UE. In particular, we denote as P̂w,(u) ∈ R2×(L+1) , ∀w ∈ {1, . . . , K} the local
information available at the u-th UE about the position matrix Pw . This information is modeled
as follows:
P̂w,(u) = Pw + Ew,(u)
∀w ∈ {1, . . . , K}
where Ew,(u) denotes the following matrix:
h
i
w,(u)
w,(u)
w,(u)
w,(u)
Ew,(u) = eBS
eR1
. . . eRL−1 eUE
(16)
(17)
containing the random position errors which the u-th UE made in estimating pw
n . Such error
comes with an arbitrary, yet known, probability density function few,(u)
.
n
Definition 3. We will denote as P̂ (u) , where:
P̂ (u) = {P̂1,(u) , . . . , P̂K,(u) }
(18)
the overall local information available at the u-th UE containing all the estimated position
matrices P̂w,(u) , ∀w ∈ {1, . . . , K}.
8
B. Hierarchical Location-Information Exchange
The hierarchical (or nested) model is a sub-case of the distributed model in which the u-th
UE has access to the estimates of the UEs u + 1, . . . , K. As we will see in the next section,
this information structure enables some coordination for just half of the overhead needed in a
conventional two-way exchange mechanism. One consequence in particular is that the u-th UE
is able to retrieve the beam decisions carried out at (the less informed) UEs u + 1, . . . , K.
C. Additional Information
In what follows the number of dominant paths, and their average powers (σ`u )2 , ` ∈ {1, . . . , L}; u ∈
{1, . . . , K} are assumed to be known at each UE, based on prior averaged measurements.
Likewise, statistical distributions fenw,(u) , ∀u, w are supposed to be quasi-static and as such are
supposed to be available to each UE. In other words, the u-th UE is aware of the amount of
error in the position estimates which it and other UEs have to cope with.
IV. M ULTI -U SER L OCATION -A IDED H YBRID P RECODING
In order to maximize the received SNR γ u defined in (2) for each UE, the mutual optimization
of both analog and digital components must be taken into account. A common approach consists
in decoupling the design, as the analog beamformer can be optimized in terms of long-term channel statistics, whereas the digital one can be made dependent on instantaneous information [25].
A. Uncoordinated Beam Selection
We first review here the approach given in [12], where the authors proposed to design
the analog beamformers to maximize the received power for each UE, neglecting multi-user
interference. Once the analog beamformers are fixed at both UE and BS sides, the design of the
digital beamformer at the BS follows the conventional MU-MIMO approach. In this respect, a
common choice is to consider ZF combining. Therefore, the digital beamforming matrix WD is
the pseudo-inverse of the effective channel matrix H̃ ∈ CNRF ×K , which is defined as follows [23]:
WD = H̃H H̃
−1
H̃H
(19)
where
h
i
h
i
H
H
H
H̃ = WRF
H1 v1 WRF
H2 v2 . . . WRF
HK vK , and with WRF = w1 w2 . . . wK .
9
When position and path average power information is available, the beam selection (quun ∈
VBS , pun
u ∈ VUE ) at the analog stage of the algorithm proposed in [12] – which we will denote
as uncoordinated (un) – can be expressed as follows:
u
(u)
)
=
argmax
R
P̂
,
q
,
p
(quun , pun
u u , ∀u
u
(20)
qu ∈VBS
pu ∈VUE
where we have defined the single-user rate Ru as [22]:
Guqu ,pu (Pu )
u
R (P, qu , pu ) = log2 1 +
σn2
(21)
Equation (20) can be solved through direct search of the maximum in the matrix Gu , derived
from P̂ (u) through (11).
While being simple to implement, the information at each UE in this method is treated as
perfect, although some Bayesian robustization can be introduced [22]. Another limitation of this
approach is that each UE solves its own beam selection problem in a way which is independent
of other UEs, thus ignoring the possible impairments in terms of interference. We illustrate this
effect in Fig. 2, where we plot the mean rate per UE obtained when the analog precoders are
chosen through (20), in case of K = 2 UEs, perfect position information, as a function of rcl . As
the inter-UE average distance decreases, the performance of this procedure degrades, since the
UEs have much more chance to share common best propagation paths (which results in severe
interference at the analog stage at the BS). The action of the ZF is noticeable but not sufficient
for small cluster radii. In what follows, we consider different flavors of coordination.
B. Naive-Coordinated Beam Selection
In order to improve performance, we design the analog precoders according to the following
figure of merit, which takes into account the average multi-user interference at the analog stage:
R(P, q1:K , p1:K ) =
K
X
u=1
log2 1 + P
Guqu ,pu (Pu )
w
w
2
w Gqu ,pw (P ) + σn
(22)
Remark 2. We used here the short-hand q1:K , p1:K to denote the indexes q1 , . . . , qK and p1 , . . . , pK ,
respectively.
The hierarchical model allows the u-th UE to predict the beam selected at UEs u + 1, . . . , K.
However, for a full coordination, the u-th UE would also need to know the precoding strategies
of the more informed UEs, i.e. UE 1, . . . , u − 1, which involves some guessing [26].
10
14
Mean rate per user [b/s/Hz]
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Single−User
Hybrid
Analog
1
3
5
7
9
11
13
Cluster radius [m]
15
17
19
21
Fig. 2: Mean rate per UE vs Cluster radius. The performance degrades sharply as the inter-UE
average distance decreases.
As a first approximation, the u-th UE can assume that its estimates are perfect (error-free)
and global (shared between all the UEs). Since UEs 1, . . . , u − 1 have in fact different estimates,
and since such information is not error-free, we call this approach naive-coordinated (nc). The
beam indexes (qunc ∈ VBS , pnc
u ∈ VUE ) associated to the u-th UE are then found as follows:
(u)
o
o
(q̃1:u−1 , qunc , p̃1:u−1 , pnc
)
=
argmax
R
P̂
,
q
,
p
(23)
qu+1:K ,pu+1:K
1:u 1:u
u
q1 ,...,qu ∈VBS
p1 ,...,pu ∈VUE
o
Remark 3. We make here an abuse of notation. The subscripts qu+1:K
, pou+1:K acknowledge for
the known strategies at the u-th UE. Those strategies are fixed parameters of the function R.
The same notation will be used in the rest of the paper.
Remark 4. The u-th UE will use the precoding vector associated to the index pnc
u ∈ VUE to
reach the BS and will discard the remaining beam indexes q̃1:u−1 , p̃1:u−1 found for the other
UEs. Indeed, those indexes only correspond to guesses realized at the u-th UE which do not
necessarily correspond to the true beams used for transmission at UEs 1, . . . , u − 1. We have
introduced the notation q̃u to denote such beams.
11
C. Statistically-Coordinated Beam Selection
The naive-coordinated approach relies on the correctness of the position estimates available at
each UE. As a consequence, its performance is expected to degrade in case of GPS inaccuracies
or lost location awareness. As the precision of position estimates decreases, the beam selection
is expected to have more confidence in long-term statistics alone, to predict the behavior of
the UE which are higher ranked in the information chain. In this case, the position estimates
are not exploited, and each UE relies on prior statistics to figure out other UEs’ information.
We denote the resulting statistically-coordinated (sc) beam indexes relative to the u-th UE as
(qusc ∈ VBS , psc
u ∈ VUE ), which read as follows:
(q̃1:u−1 , qusc , p̃1:u−1 , psc
u)
h
i
o
o
= argmax EP|rcl Rqu+1:K ,pu+1:K P, q1:u , p1:u
(24)
q1 ,...,qu ∈VBS
p1 ,...,pu ∈VUE
This is a long-term optimization which is updated only if prior statistics change. Thus, (24)
represents a simple stochastic optimization problem [27] which can be solved through e.g.
approximation of the expectation operator (carried out over prior statistics) with Monte-Carlo
iterations.
D. Robust-Coordinated Beam Selection
The UEs have also access to the statistics of their local position estimates. In the previous
approach, each UE used prior statistics to guess the precoding strategies of the more informed
UEs. This helps in case the local information available at the u-th UE is not accurate enough to
gain more knowledge about the UEs 1, . . . , u−1. In the opposite case, local statistical information
can be exploited to supplement prior information. In this approach, the UEs look for beam
selection strategies which progressively pass from exploiting local information only – in case
of perfect local information – to exploiting statistical information only – in case of poor local
information. We denote this approach as robust-coordinated (rc). The beams (qurc ∈ VBS , prc
u ∈
VUE ) for the u-th UE are obtained through:
h
i
o
o
R
P,
q
,
p
(q̃1:u−1 , qurc , p̃1:u−1 , prc
)
=
argmax
E
qu+1:K ,pu+1:K
1:u 1:u
u
P|P̂ (u) ,rcl
(25)
q1 ,...,qu ∈VBS
p1 ,...,pu ∈VUE
Remark 5. Here, the u-th UE considers its locally-available position estimates as imperfect and
globally-shared.
Also in this case, an approximate solution can be obtained through Monte-Carlo methods,
generating possible matrices P according to the (known) distribution P|P̂ (u) , rcl .
12
We summarize the proposed robust-coordinated beam selection used at the u-th UE in Algorithm 1. In Step 1, the u-th UE retrieves the processing carried out at less informed UEs
u + 1, . . . , K. The K-th UE skips this step. In Step 2, beam selection is performed through (22)
(an approximation) and (25).
Algorithm 1 frc : Robust-Coordinated Beam Selection (u-th UE)
INPUT: P̂ (w) , ∀w ∈ {u, . . . , K}, pdf of (P|P̂ (w) , rcl ), ∀w ∈ {u, . . . , K}
Step 1
1: for w = K : u + 1 do
2:
o
(qw
, pow )
= frc (P̂
(w)
. The K-th UE skips this decreasing for loop
o
, qw+1:K
, pow+1:K )
3: end for
Step 2
4: return (qurc , prc
u ) ← Evaluate (25)
. Refer to Algorithm 2 for implementation details
Algorithm 2 Implementation details for Step 2 in Algorithm 1 (u-th UE)
o
o
, pou+1 , . . . , poK
INPUT: P̂ (u) , pdf of (P|P̂ (u) , rcl ), qu+1
, . . . , qK
1: for i = 1 : M do
. Approximate expectation over (P|P̂ (w) , rcl ), ∀w with M Monte-Carlo iterations
2:
Generate possible position matrices P through sampling over the distribution (P|P̂ (w) , rcl )
3:
Compute possible gain matrices Ĝw , ∀w ∈ {1, . . . , K} through (11) using the generated P
4:
o
o
, pou+1 , . . . , poK )
S UM R ATE E VAL(Ĝ1 , . . . , ĜK , qu+1
, . . . , qK
. Described in Algorithm 3
5: end for
6: Compute the average sum-rate over the Monte-Carlo iterations for all possible beam pairs
7: (qurc , prc
u ) ← Indexes relative to the beams achieving maximum average sum-rate
8: The pair of vectors with indexes (qurc , prc
u ) is assigned to the u-th UE
V. S IMULATION R ESULTS
We evaluate here the performance of the proposed algorithms. We consider L = 3 multipath
components. A distance of 100 m is assumed from the UEs’ cluster center and the BS. The radius
of the UEs’ cluster is set to rcl = 7 m. Both the BS and UEs are equipped with NUE = NBS = 64
antennas (ULA). The number of elements in the beam codebooks is MUE = MBS = 64, with
grid angles spaced according to the inverse cosine function so as to guarantee equal gain losses
among adjacent angles [22]. All the plotted rates are the averaged – over 10000 Monte-Carlo
runs – rates per UE.
13
Algorithm 3 Function evaluating an approximated average sum-rate (22) (u-th UE)
o
o
1: function S UM R ATE E VAL(Ĝ1 , . . . , ĜK , qu+1
, . . . , qK
, pou+1 , . . . , poK )
2:
o
o
KnownInds = {qu+1
, . . . , qK
, pou+1 , . . . , poK }
3:
for w = 1 : u − 1 do
4:
. The most informed UE 1 skips this loop
P
v
(qw , . . . , qu , pw , . . . , pu ) = max Ĝw
. with given KnownInds
qw ,pw /(
v6=w Ĝqw ,pv + N0 )
5:
KnownInds = {qw , pw } ∪ KnownInds
6:
Discard all the other indexes qw+1 , . . . , qu , pw+1 , . . . , pu
. Updated set of indexes to be used in the next iteration
7:
end for
8:
P
return Ĝuqu ,pu /( w6=u Ĝw
qu ,pw + N0 ) for all possible qu , pu
. with given KnownInds
9: end function
A. Location Information Model
In the simulations, we adopt a uniform bounded error model for location information [20],
[22]. In particular, we assume that all the position estimates lie somewhere inside disks centered
in the actual positions pun , n ∈ {UE, BS, Rui }; i ∈ {1, . . . , L − 1}; u ∈ {1, . . . , K}. Let S(r) be
the two-dimensional closed ball centered at the origin and of radius r, which is S(r) = {υ ∈
w,(u)
R2 : kυk ≤ r}. We model the estimation errors en
w,(u)
in S(rn
w,(u)
), where rn
as a random variable uniformly distributed
is the maximum positioning error for the node n of the w-th UE as
seen from the u-th UE.
B. Results and Discussion
To evaluate the performance, we start with a simple configuration with K = 2 UEs.
1) Strong LoS: In what follows, we consider a stronger (on average) LoS path with respect
to the reflected paths, being indeed the prominent propagation driver in mmWave bands [2], [3].
The reflected paths are assumed to have the same average power. The average power of such
(1)
(2)
paths is assumed to be shared across the UEs, i.e. (σ` )2 , = (σ` )2 , ∀` ∈ {1, . . . , L}.
In Fig. 3, we consider the performance of the proposed algorithm as a function of the precision
of the information available at the less informed UE. In particular, an error radius of 5 m means
w,(2)
rn
= 5 m, ∀w, n. As for the most informed UE, we consider perfect information in Fig. 3a,
w,(1)
i.e. rn
w,(1)
= 0 m, ∀w, n, and 3 m of precision in Fig. 3b, i.e. rn
= 3 m, ∀w, n.
Fig. 3a and Fig. 3b show that both the uncoordinated and the naive approaches degrade fast as
the error radius for the less informed UE increases. This is due to the fact that the UEs build their
14
strategies according to their available position estimates, which become unreliable to perform
beam selection. In particular, when the precision is less than 6 m, the statistically-coordinated
approach – based on statistical information only – behaves better. The robust-coordinated approach outperforms all the other algorithms, being able to discriminate for interference at the
BS side, while taking into account the noise present in position information.
9.5
8
Robust−Coordinated
Stat.−Coordinated
Naive−Coordinated
Uncoordinated
7.5
8.5
Mean rate per UE [b/s/Hz]
Mean rate per UE [b/s/Hz]
9
8
7.5
7
6.5
6
Robust−Coordinated
Stat.−Coordinated
Naive−Coordinated
Uncoordinated
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pos. information precision for less informed UE [m]
18
(a) Most informed UE with perfect information
20
4.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pos. information precision for less informed UE [m]
18
20
(b) Most informed UE with 3 m precision
Fig. 3: Mean rate per UE vs Position information precision. Strong LoS.
2) LoS Blockage: It is also interesting to observe how the proposed algorithms behave in
case of total line-of-sight blockage, while having one stronger reflected path.
Fig. 4 compares the proposed algorithms as a function of the error radius for the less informed UE. The most informed UE is assumed to have access to perfect information. The same
considerations outlined for the strong LoS case remain valid. It is possible to observe that the
uncoordinated approach performs worse than before (with strong LoS), since the UEs choose
to use the beams pointing towards the same stronger reflected path. As a consequence, there is
much more chance to arrive at the BS with non-distinguishable AoAs. In such cases, coordination
between the UEs is essential to combat multi-user interference.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
In mmWave communications, multi-user interference has to be handled in the analog stage as
well. In this respect, suitable strategies for multi-user interference minimization can be applied
in the beam domain through e.g. exploitation of location-dependent information.
15
9.5
Robust−Coordinated
Stat.−Coordinated
Naive−Coordinated
Uncoordinated
Mean rate per UE [b/s/Hz]
9
8.5
8
7.5
7
6.5
6
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pos. information precision for less informed UE [m]
18
20
Fig. 4: Mean rate per UE vs Position information precision. LoS blockage.
Dealing with the imperfections in location information is not trivial, due to the decentralized
nature of the information, which leads to disagreements between the UEs affecting performance.
In this work, we introduced a decentralized robust algorithm which aim to select the best precoder
for each UE taking both the noise present in location information and multi-user interference in
the analog stage into account.
Numerical experiments have shown that good performance can be achieved with the proposed
algorithm and have confirmed that coordination is essential to counteract inter-UE interference
in mmWave multi-user environments.
Exploiting Machine Learning tools [28] for solving the proposed algorithms in a more efficient
manner is an interesting and challenging problem which we aim to tackle in future studies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
F. Maschietti, D. Gesbert and P. de Kerret are supported by the ERC under the European
Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Agreement no. 670896).
16
R EFERENCES
[1] R. W. Heath, N. González-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An overview of signal processing techniques
for millimeter wave MIMO systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., Apr. 2016.
[2] M. R. Akdeniz, Y. Liu, M. K. Samimi, S. Sun, S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip, “Millimeter wave channel
modeling and cellular capacity evaluation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., June 2014.
[3] T. S. Rappaport, G. R. MacCartney, M. K. Samimi, and S. Sun, “Wideband millimeter-wave propagation measurements
and channel models for future wireless communication system design,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Sept. 2015.
[4] L. Lu, G. Y. Li, A. L. Swindlehurst, A. Ashikhmin, and R. Zhang, “An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits and
challenges,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., Oct. 2014.
[5] B. Biglarbegian, M. Fakharzadeh, D. Busuioc, M. R. Nezhad-Ahmadi, and S. Safavi-Naeini, “Optimized microstrip antenna
arrays for emerging millimeter-wave wireless applications,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., May 2011.
[6] O. E. Ayach, S. Rajagopal, S. Abu-Surra, Z. Pi, and R. W. Heath, “Spatially sparse precoding in millimeter wave MIMO
systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Mar. 2014.
[7] A. Alkhateeb, O. E. Ayach, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation and hybrid precoding for millimeter wave
cellular systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., Oct. 2014.
[8] F. Sohrabi and W. Yu, “Hybrid digital and analog beamforming design for large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics
Signal Process., Apr. 2016.
[9] C. Rusu, R. Mèndez-Rial, N. González-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “Low complexity hybrid precoding strategies for
millimeter wave communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Dec. 2016.
[10] K. Venugopal, A. Alkhateeb, N. González-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “Channel estimation for hybrid architecture-based
wideband millimeter wave systems,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., Sept. 2017.
[11] F. Sohrabi and W. Yu, “Hybrid analog and digital beamforming for mmWave OFDM large-scale antenna arrays,” IEEE J.
Sel. Areas Commun., Jul. 2017.
[12] A. Alkhateeb, G. Leus, and R. W. Heath, “Limited feedback hybrid precoding for multi-user millimeter wave systems,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Nov. 2015.
[13] J. Wang, “Beam codebook based beamforming protocol for multi-Gbps millimeter-wave WPAN systems,” IEEE J. Sel.
Areas Commun., Oct. 2009.
[14] S. Hur, T. Kim, D. J. Love, J. V. Krogmeier, T. A. Thomas, and A. Ghosh, “Millimeter wave beamforming for wireless
backhaul and access in small cell networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., Oct. 2013.
[15] D. Ogbe, D. J. Love, and V. Raghavan, “Noisy beam alignment techniques for reciprocal MIMO channels,” IEEE Trans.
Signal Process., Oct. 2017.
[16] J. Li, L. Xiao, X. Xu, and S. Zhou, “Robust and low complexity hybrid beamforming for uplink multiuser mmWave MIMO
systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., June 2016.
[17] Y. Zhu and T. Yang, “Low complexity hybrid beamforming for uplink multiuser mmWave MIMO systems,” in Proc. IEEE
Wireless Commun. and Netw. Conf. (WCNC), Mar. 2017.
[18] J. Choi, V. Va, N. González-Prelcic, R. Daniels, C. R. Bhat, and R. W. Heath, “Millimeter-wave vehicular communication
to support massive automotive sensing,” IEEE Commun. Mag., Dec. 2016.
[19] A. Ali, N. González-Prelcic, and R. W. Heath, “Millimeter wave beam-selection using out-of-band spatial information,”
CoRR, Feb. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08574
[20] N. Garcia, H. Wymeersch, E. G. Ström, and D. Slock, “Location-aided mm-wave channel estimation for vehicular
communication,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Signal Process. Advances in Wireless Commun. (SPAWC), Jul. 2016.
17
[21] V. Va, J. Choi, T. Shimizu, G. Bansal, and R. W. H. Jr., “Inverse multipath fingerprinting for millimeter wave V2I beam
alignment,” CoRR, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05942
[22] F. Maschietti, D. Gesbert, P. de Kerret, and H. Wymeersch, “Robust location-aided beam alignment in millimeter wave
massive MIMO,” Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), Dec. 2017.
[23] D. Tse and P. Viswanath, Fundamentals of Wireless Communication.
Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[24] Y. Yu, et al., “A 60 GHz phase shifter integrated with LNA and PA in 65 nm CMOS for phased array systems,” IEEE J.
Solid-State Circuits, Sept. 2010.
[25] Z. Li, S. Han, and A. F. Molisch, “Optimizing channel-statistics-based analog beamforming for millimeter-wave multi-user
massive MIMO downlink,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., Jul. 2017.
[26] Y.-C. Ho and K.-C. Chu, “Team decision theory and information structures in optimal control problems,” IEEE Trans.
Autom. Control, Feb. 1972.
[27] A. Shapiro, D. Dentcheva, and A. Ruszczyński, Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory. Philadelphia,
PA, USA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2014.
[28] C. Rasmussen and C. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning, ser. Adaptive Computation and Machine
Learning.
Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2006.
| 7cs.IT
|
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian
Agents
Luca Bortolussi
Rocco De Nicola
Vashti Galpin
Stephen Gilmore
Saarland University
University of Trieste
ISTI - CNR
IMT Lucca
University of Edinburgh
University of Edinburgh
Jane Hillston
Diego Latella
Michele Loreti
Mieke Massink
University of Edinburgh
ISTI - CNR
Università di Firenze
IMT Lucca
ISTI - CNR
In this paper we present C ARMA, a language recently defined to support specification and analysis
of collective adaptive systems. C ARMA is a stochastic process algebra equipped with linguistic
constructs specifically developed for modelling and programming systems that can operate in openended and unpredictable environments. This class of systems is typically composed of a huge number
of interacting agents that dynamically adjust and combine their behaviour to achieve specific goals.
A C ARMA model, termed a collective, consists of a set of components, each of which exhibits a set of
attributes. To model dynamic aggregations, which are sometimes referred to as ensembles, C ARMA
provides communication primitives that are based on predicates over the exhibited attributes. These
predicates are used to select the participants in a communication. Two communication mechanisms
are provided in the C ARMA language: multicast-based and unicast-based. In this paper, we first
introduce the basic principles of C ARMA and then we show how our language can be used to support
specification with a simple but illustrative example of a socio-technical collective adaptive system.
1
Introduction
Collective adaptive systems (CAS) typically consist of very large numbers of components which exhibit
autonomic behaviour depending on their properties, objectives and actions. Decision-making in such
systems is complicated and interaction between their components may introduce new and sometimes
unexpected behaviours. CAS are open, in the sense that components may enter or leave the collective at
anytime. Components can be highly heterogeneous (machines, humans, networks, etc.) each operating
at different temporal and spatial scales, and having different (potentially conflicting) objectives. We are
still far from being able to design and engineer real collective adaptive systems, or even specify the
principles by which they should operate.
CAS thus provide a significant research challenge in terms of both representation and reasoning about
their behaviour. The pervasive yet transparent nature of the applications developed in this paradigm
makes it of paramount importance that their behaviour can be thoroughly assessed during their design,
prior to deployment, and throughout their lifetime. Indeed their adaptive nature makes modelling essential and models play a central role in driving their adaptation. Moreover, the analysis should encompass
both functional and non-functional aspects of behaviour. Thus it is vital that we have available robust
modelling techniques which are able to describe such systems and to reason about their behaviour in
both qualitative and quantitative terms. To move towards this goal, we consider it important to develop
a theoretical foundation for collective adaptive systems that would help in understanding their distincN. Bertrand and M. Tribastone (Eds.): QAPL 2015
EPTCS 194, 2015, pp. 16–31, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.194.2
c L. Bortolussi et al.
This work is licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License.
L. Bortolussi et al.
17
tive features. In this paper we present C ARMA, a language designed within the QUANTICOL project1
specifically for the specification and analysis of CAS, with the particular objective of supporting quantitive evaluation and verification.
C ARMA builds on a long tradition of stochastic process algebras such as PEPA [13], MTIPP [12],
EMPA [2], Stochastic π-Calculus [15], Bio-PEPA [5], MODEST [3] and others [11, 4]. It combines the
lessons which have been learned from these languages with those learned from developing languages
to model CAS, such as SCEL [8] and PALOMA [9], which feature attribute-based communication and
explicit representation of locations.
SCEL [8] (Software Component Ensemble Language), is a kernel language that has been designed to
support the programming of autonomic computing systems. This language relies on the notions of autonomic components representing the collective members, and autonomic-component ensembles representing collectives. Each component is equipped with an interface, consisting of a collection of attributes,
describing different features of components. Attributes are used by components to dynamically organise
themselves into ensembles and as a means to select partners for interaction. The stochastic variant of
SCEL, called StocS [14], was a first step towards the investigation of the impact of different stochastic
semantics for autonomic processes, that relies on stochastic output semantics, probabilistic input semantics and on a probabilistic notion of knowledge. Moreover, SCEL has inspired the development of the
core calculus AbC [1] that focuses on a minimal set of primitives that defines attribute-based communication, and investigates their impact. Communication among components takes place in a broadcast
fashion, with the characteristic that only components satisfying predicates over specific attributes receive
the sent messages, provided that they are willing to do so.
PALOMA [9] is a process algebra that takes as starting point a model based on located Markovian
agents each of which is parameterised by a location, which can be regarded as an attribute of the agent.
The ability of agents to communicate depends on their location, through a perception function. This
can be regarded as an example of a more general class of attribute-based communication mechanisms.
The communication is based on a multicast, as only agents who enable the appropriate reception action
have the ability to receive the message. The scope of communication is thus adjusted according to the
perception function.
A distinctive contribution of the new language is the rich set of communication primitives that are
offered. C ARMA supports both unicast and broadcast communication, and locally synchronous, but globally asynchronous communication. This richness is important to enable the spatially distributed nature of
CAS, where agents may have only local awareness of the system, yet the design objectives and adaptation
goals are often expressed in terms of global behaviour. Representing these rich patterns of communication in classical process algebras or traditional stochastic process algebras would be difficult, and would
require the introduction of additional model components to represent buffers, queues and other communication structures. Another feature of C ARMA is the explicit representation of the environment in which
processes interact, allowing rapid testing of a system under different open world scenarios. The environment in C ARMA models can evolve at runtime, due to the feedback from the system, and it further
modulates the interaction between components, by shaping rates and interaction probabilities. Furthermore the large scale nature of CAS systems makes it essential to support scalable analysis techniques,
thus C ARMA has been designed anticipating both a discrete and a continuous semantics in the style of
[16].
The focus of this paper is the presentation of the language and its discrete semantics, which are
presented in the F U TS style [7]. The structure of the paper is as follows. Section 2 presents the syntax
1 http://www.quanticol.eu
18
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
of the language and explains the organisation of a model in terms of a collective of agents that are
considered in the context of an environment. In Section 3 we give a detailed account of the semantics,
particularly explaining the role of the environment. The use of C ARMA is illustrated in Section 4 where
we describe a model of a simple bike sharing system. Some conclusions are drawn in Section 5.
2
C ARMA syntax
A C ARMA system consists of a collective (N) operating in an environment (E ). The collective consists of
a set of components. It models the behavioural part of a system and is used to describe a set of interacting
agents that cooperate to achieve a set of given tasks. The environment models all those aspects which
are intrinsic to the context where the agents under consideration are operating. The environment also
mediates agent interactions.
We let S YS be the set of C ARMA systems S defined by the following syntax:
S ::= N in E
where N is a collective and E is an environment. The latter provides the global state of the system and
governs the interactions in the collective.
We let C OL be the set of collectives N which are generated by the following grammar:
NkN
N ::= C
A collective N is either a component C or the parallel composition of two collectives (N k N).
A component C can be either the inactive component, which is denoted by 0, or a term of the form
(P, γ), where P is a process and γ is a store. A term (P, γ) models an agent operating in the system under
consideration: the process P represents the agent’s behaviour whereas the store γ models its knowledge.
A store is a function which maps attribute names to basic values. We let:
• ATTR be the set of attribute names a, a0 , a1 ,. . . , b, b0 , b1 ,. . . ;
• VAL be the set of basic values v, v0 , v1 ,. . . ;
• Γ be the set of stores γ, γ1 , γ 0 , . . . i.e. functions from ATTR to VAL.
We let C OMP be the set of components C generated by the following grammar:
(P, γ)
C ::= 0
We let P ROC be the set of processes P, Q,. . . defined by the following grammar:
P, Q ::=
|
|
|
|
|
|
−
act ::= α ? [π]h→
e iσ
→
−
| α [π]h e iσ
nil
kill
act.P
P+Q
P|Q
[π]P
A
|
|
−
α ? [π](→
x )σ
→
−
α [π]( x )σ
e ::= a | this.a | x | v | · · ·
4
(A = P)
π ::= > | ⊥ | e1 ./ e2 | ¬π | π ∧ π | · · ·
−
In C ARMA processes can perform four types of actions: broadcast output (α ? [π]h→
e iσ ), broadcast
→
−
→
−
→
−
?
input (α [π]( x )σ ), output (α [π]h e iσ ), and input (α [π]( x )σ ). Where:
L. Bortolussi et al.
19
• α is an action type in the set of action type ACT T YPE;
• π is an predicate;
• x is a variable in the set of variables VAR;
−· indicates a sequence of elements;
• →
• σ is an update, i.e. a function from Γ to Dist(Γ) in the set of updates Σ; where Dist(Γ) is the set
of probability distributions over Γ.
The admissible communication partners of each of these actions are identified by the predicate π.
This is a predicate on attribute names. Note that, in a component (P, γ) the store γ regulates the behaviour
of P. Primarily, γ is used to evaluate the predicate associated with an action in order to filter the possible
synchronisations involving process P. In addition, γ is also used as one of the parameters for computing
the actual rate of actions performed by P. The process P can change γ immediately after the execution
of an action. This change is brought about by the update σ . The update is a function that when given a
store γ returns a probability distribution over Γ which expresses the possible evolutions of the store after
the action execution.
−
The broadcast output α ? [π]h→
e iσ models the execution of an action α that spreads the values result−
ing from the evaluation of expressions →
e in the local store γ. This message can be potentially received
by any process located at components whose store satisfies predicate π. This predicate may contain references to attribute names that have to be evaluated under the local store. These references are prefixed
by the special name this. For instance, if loc is the attribute used to store the position of a component,
action
−
α ? [distance(this.loc, loc) ≤ L]h→
v iσ
potentially involves all the components located at a distance that is less than or equal to a given threshold
L. The broadcast output is non-blocking. The action is executed even if no process is able to receive
the values which are sent. Immediately after the execution of an action, the update σ is used to compute
the (possible) effects of the performed action on the store of the hosting component where the output is
performed.
−
To receive a broadcast message, a process executes a broadcast input of the form α ? [π](→
x )σ . This
→
−
action is used to receive a tuple of values v sent with an action α from a component whose store
−
−
satisfies the predicate π[→
v /→
x ]. The transmitted values can be part of the predicate π. For instance,
α ? [x > 5](x)σ can be used to receive a value that is greater than 5.
The other two kinds of action, namely output and input, are similar. However, differently from
broadcasts described above, these actions realise a point-to-point interaction. The output operation is
blocking, in contrast with the non-blocking broadcast output.
Choice and parallel composition are the usual definitions for process algebras. Processes can be
guarded so that [π]P behaves as the process P if the predicate π is satisfied. Finally, process kill is used
to destroy a component. We assume that this term always occurs under the scope of an action prefix.
C ARMA collectives operate in an environment E . This environment is used to model the intrinsic
rules that govern, for instance, the physical context where our system is situated.
An environment consists of two elements: a global store γg , that models the overall state of the
system, and an evolution rule ρ. The latter is a function which, depending on the global store and
the current state of the collective, i.e. the configurations of each component in the collective, returns a
tuple of functions ε = hµ p , µr , µu i known as the evaluation context where ACT = ACT T YPE ∪ {α ? |α ∈
ACT T YPE} and:
20
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
• µ p : Γ × ACT → [0, 1], expresses the probability to receive a message;
• µr : Γ × Γ × ACT → R≥0 , computes the execution rate of an action;
• µu : Γ × ACT → Σ × C OL, determines the updates on the environment (global store and collective)
induced by the action execution.
These functions regulate system behaviour. Function µ p , which takes as parameters the local stores
of the two interacting components, i.e. the sender and the receiver, and the action used to interact, returns
the probability to receive a message. Function µr computes the rate of an unicast/broadcast output. This
function takes as parameter the local store of the component performing the action and the action on
which interaction is based. Note that the environment can disable the execution of a given action. This
happens when the function µr (resp. µ p ) returns the value 0. Finally, the function µu is used to update the
global store and to install a new collective in the system. The function µu takes as parameters the store
of the component performing the action together with the action type and returns a pair (σ , N). Within
this pair, σ identifies the update on the global store whereas N is a new collective installed in the system.
This function is particularly useful for modelling the arrival of new agents into a system. All of these
functions are determined by an evolution rule ρ depending on the global store and the actual state of the
components in the system. For instance, the probability to receive a given message may depend on the
concentration of components in a given state. Similarly, the actual rate of an action may be a function of
the number of components whose store satisfies a given property.
3
C ARMA operational semantics
In this section we define the operational semantics of C ARMA specifications. This operational semantics
·
is defined in three stages. First, we introduce the transition relation −−+· that describes the behaviour of
·
a single component. Second, this relation is used to define the transition relation −−→· which describes
·
the behaviour of collectives. Finally, the transition relation 7−−→ will be defined to show how C ARMA
systems evolve.
All these transition relations are defined in the F U TS style [7]. Using this approach, a transition
relation is described using a triple of the form (N, `, N ). The first element of this triple is either a
component, or a collective, or a system. The second element is a transition label. The third element is
a function associating each component, collective, or system with a non-negative number. A non-zero
value represents the rate of the exponential distribution characterising the time needed for the execution
of the action represented by `. The zero value is associated with unreachable terms. We use the F U TS
style semantics because it makes explicit an underlying Action Labelled Markov Chain, which can be
simulated with standard algorithms [10] but is nevertheless more compact than Plotkin-style semantics,
as the functional form allows different possible outcomes to be treated within a single rule. A complete
description of F U TS and their use can be found in [7].
3.1
Operational semantics of components
We use the transition relation +
− ε ⊆ C OMP × L AB × [C OMP → R≥0 ] to define the behaviour of a single
component. In this relation [C OMP → R≥0 ] denotes the set of functions from C OMP to R≥0 and L AB is
L. Bortolussi et al.
21
the set of transition labels ` which are generated by the following grammar:
−
` ::= α ? [π]h→
v i, γ
Broadcast output
|
|
−
α ? [π](→
v ), γ
→
−
α [π]h v i, γ
Broadcast input
Unicast Output
|
−
α [π](→
v ), γ
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i, γ]
|
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ] Broadcast Input Refusal
|
Unicast Input
Unicast Synchronization
The first four labels are associated with the four C ARMA input-output actions and they contain a reference
to the action which is performed (α or α ? ), the store of the component where the action is executed (γ),
−
and the value which is transmitted or received. The transition label τ[α [π]h→
v i, γ] is the one which
→
−
?
is associated with unicast synchronisation. The final label R[α [π]( v ), γ] denotes the case where a
component is not able to receive a broadcast output. This arises at the level of the single component
either because the associated message has been lost, or because no process is willing to receive that
−
message. We will observe later in this section that the use of R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ] labels are crucial to handle
appropriately dynamic process operators, namely choice and guard.
The transition relation +
− ε , as formally defined in Table 1 and Table 2, is parametrised with respect
to an evaluation context ε. This is used to compute the actual rate of process actions and to compute the
probability to receive messages.
The process nil denotes the process that cannot perform any action. The transitions which are induced by this process at the level of components can be derived via rules Nil and Nil-F1. These rules
respectively say that the inactive process cannot perform any action, and always refuses any broadcast
input. Note that, the fact that a component (nil, γ) does not perform any transition is derived from the
fact that any label that is not a broadcast input refusal leads to function 0/ (rule Nil). Indeed, 0/ denotes
the 0 constant function. Conversely, Nil-F1 states that (nil, γ) can always perform a transition labelled
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ] leading to [(nil, γ) 7→ 1], where [C 7→ v] denotes the function mapping the component C
to v ∈ R≥0 and all the other components to 0.
−
The behaviour of a broadcast output (α ? [π1 ]h→
e iσ .P, γ) is described by rules B-Out, B-Out-F1 and
−
B-Out-F2. Rule B-Out states that a broadcast output α ? [π]h→
e iσ can affect components that satisfy
0
2
π = JπKγ . The action rate is determined by the evaluation context ε = hµ p , µr , µu i and, in particular, by
the function µr . This function, given a store γ and the kind of action performed, in this case α ? , returns
a value in R≥0 . If this value is greater than 0, it denotes the execution rate of the action. However, the
evaluation context can disable the execution of some actions. This happens when µr (γ, α ? ) = 0. The
possible next local stores after the execution of an action are determined by the update σ . This takes the
store γ and yields a probability distribution p = σ (γ) ∈ Dist(Γ). In rule B-Out, and in the rest of the
paper, the following notations are used:
• let P ∈ P ROC and p ∈ Dist(Γ), (P, p) is a probability distribution in Dist(C OMP) such that:
P ≡ Q|kill ∧ C ≡ 0
1
p(γ) C ≡ (P, γ) ∧ P 6≡ Q|kill
(P, p)(C) =
0
otherwise
• let c ∈ Dist(C OMP) and r ∈ R≥0 , r · c denotes the function C : C OMP → R≥0 such that: C (C) =
r · c(C)
2 We
let J·Kγ denote the evaluation function of an expression/predicate with respect to the store γ.
22
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
−
` 6= R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]
Nil
`
Nil-F1
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
(nil, γ) +
− ε 0/
(nil, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε [(nil, γ) 7→ 1]
JπKγ = π 0
−
−
J→
e Kγ = →
v
p = σ (γ) ε = hµ p , µr , µu i
−
α ? [π 0 ]h→
v i,γ
−
(α ? [π]h→
e iσ .P, γ) −−−−−−−+ε µr (γ, α ? ) · (P, p)
B-Out
→
−
R[β ? [π2 ]( v ),γ]
−
−
(α ? [π1 ]h→
e iσ .P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε [(α ? [π1 ]h→
e iσ .P, γ) 7→ 1]
JπKγ = π 0
B-Out-F1
−
−
J→
e Kγ = →
v
−
−
` 6= α ? [π 0 ]h→
v i, γ ` 6= R[β ? [π 0 ](→
v 1 ), γ]
B-Out-F2
`
−
(α ? [π]h→
e iσ .P, γ) +
− ε 0/
−
−
Jπ2 [→
v /→
x ]Kγ2 = π20
γ1 |= π20
−
−
p = σ [→
v /→
x ](γ2 ) ε = hµ p , µr , µu i
γ2 |= π1
→
−
α ? [π1 ]( v ),γ1
−
−
−
(α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) −−−−−−−+ε µ p (γ1 , γ2 , α ? ) · (P[→
v /→
x ], p)
−
−
Jπ2 [→
v /→
x ]Kγ2 = π20
−
(α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 )
γ1 |= π20
−
R[α ? [π1 ](→
v ),γ1 ]
−−−−−−−−−+ε
γ2 |= π1
[(α ? [π
−
−
Jπ2 [→
v /→
x ]Kγ2 = π20
ε = hµ p , µr , µu i
→
−
?
2 ]( x )σ .P, γ2 ) 7→ 1 − µ p (γ1 , γ2 , α )]
(γ1 6|= π20 or γ2 6|= π1 )
→
−
α ? [π1 ]( v ),γ1
−
(α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) −−−−−−−+ε 0/
B-In-F1
B-In-F2
−
−
` 6= α ? [π1 ](→
v ), γ1 ` 6= R[α ? [π1 ](→
v ), γ1 ]
B-In-F3
`
→
−
(α ? [π ]( x )σ .P, γ ) +
− 0/
2
2
ε
α 6= β
(α ? [π
R[β ? [π
→
−
1 ]( v ),γ1 ]
→
−
−
−−−−−−−−+ε [(α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) 7→ 1]
2 ]( x )σ .P, γ2 ) −
B-In-F4
Table 1: Operational semantics of components (Part 1)
B-In
L. Bortolussi et al.
23
Note that, after the execution of an action a component can be destroyed. This happens when the
continuation process after the action prefixing contains the term kill. For instance, by applying rule
α ? [π1 ]hvi,γ
B-Out we have that: (α ? [π1 ]hviσ .(kill|Q), γ) −−−−−−+ε [0 7→ r].
Rule B-Out-F1 states that a broadcast output always refuses any broadcast input, while B-Out-F2
−
−
states that a broadcast output can be only involved in labels of the form α ? [π]h→
v i, γ or R[β ? [π2 ](→
v ), γ].
−
Transitions related to a broadcast input are labelled with α ? [π1 ](→
v ), γ1 . There, γ1 is the store of
the component executing the output, α is the action performed, π1 is the predicate that identifies the
−
target components, while →
v is the sequence of transmitted values. Rule B-In states that a component
−
(α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) can perform a transition with this label when its store γ2 satisfies the target predicate,
−
−
i.e. γ2 |= π1 , and the component executing the action satisfies the predicate π2 [→
v /→
x ]. The evaluation
context ε = hµ p , µr , µu i can influence the possibility to perform this action. This transition can be performed with probability µ p (γ1 , γ2 , α ? ).
Rule B-In-F1 models the fact that even if a component can potentially receive a broadcast message,
the message can get lost according to a given probability regulated by the evaluation context, namely
1 − µ p (γ1 , γ2 , α ? ). Rule B-In-F2 models the fact that if a component is not in the set of possible receivers
(γ2 6|= π1 ) or the sender does not satisfy the expected requirements (γ1 6|= π20 ) then the component cannot
−
receive a broadcast message. Finally, rules B-In-F3 and B-In-F4 model the fact that (α ? [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 )
can only perform a broadcast input on action α and that it always refuses input on any other action type
β 6= α, respectively.
The behaviour of unicast output and unicast input is defined by the first six rules of Table 2. These
rules are similar to the ones already presented for broadcast output and broadcast input. The only difference is that both unicast output (Out-F1) and unicast input (In-F1) always refuse any broadcast input
with probability 1. The other rules of Table 2 describe the behaviour of other process operators, namely
choice P + Q, parallel composition P|Q, guard and recursion.
The term P + Q identifies a process that can behave either as P or as Q. The rule Plus states that
the components that are reachable by (P + Q, γ), via a transition that is not a broadcast input refusal,
are the ones that can be reached either by (P, γ) or by (Q, γ). In this rule we use C1 ⊕ C2 to denote the
function that maps each term C to C1 (C) + C2 (C), for any C1 , C2 ∈ [C OMP → R≥0 ]. At the same time,
process P + Q refuses a broadcast input when both the process P and Q do that. This is modelled by
Plus-F1, where, for each C1 : C OMP → R≥0 and C2 : C OMP → R≥0 , C1 + C2 denotes the function that
maps each term of the form (P + Q, γ) to C1 ((P, γ)) · C2 ((Q, γ)), while any other component is mapped
to 0. Note that, differently from rule Plus, when rule Plus-F1 is applied operator + is not removed after
the transition. This models the fact that when a broadcast message is refused the choice is not resolved.
In P|Q the two composed processes interleave for all the transition labels except for broadcast input
refusal (Par). For this label the two processes synchronise (Par-F1). This models the fact that a message
is lost when both processes refuse to receive it. In the rules the following notations are used:
• for each component C and process Q we let:
0
C≡0
C|Q =
(P|Q, γ) C ≡ (P, γ)
Q|C is symmetrically defined.
• for each C : C OMP → R≥0 and process Q, C |Q (resp. Q|C ) denotes the function that maps each
term of the form C|Q (resp. Q|C) to C (C), while the others are mapped to 0;
• for each C1 : C OMP → R≥0 and C2 : C OMP → R≥0 , C1 |C2 denotes the function that maps each
term of the form (P|Q, γ) to C1 ((P, γ)) · C2 ((Q, γ)), while the others are mapped to 0.
24
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
−
−
J→
e Kγ = →
v
JπKγ = π 0
p = σ (γ) ε = hµ p , µr , µu i
−
α [π 0 ]h→
v i,γ
−
(α [π]h→
e iσ .P, γ) −−−−−−+ε µr (γ, α) · (P, p)
Out
Out-F1
→
−
R[β ? [π2 ]( v ),γ2 ]
−
−
(α [π1 ]h→
e iσ .P, γ1 ) −−−−−−−−−+ε [(α [π1 ]h→
e iσ .P, γ1 ) 7→ 1]
−
−
J→
e Kγ = →
v
−
−
` 6= α [π 0 ]h→
v i, γ ` 6= R[α ? [π 0 ](→
v ), γ]
Out-F2
`
−
(α [π]h→
e iσ .P, γ) +
− ε 0/
JπKγ = π 0
−
−
Jπ2 [→
v /→
x ]Kγ2 = π20
γ1 |= π20
−
−
p = σ [→
v /→
x ](γ2 ) ε = hµ p , µr , µu i
γ2 |= π1
→
−
α [π1 ]( v ),γ1
−
−
−
(α [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) −−−−−−−+ε µ p (γ1 , γ2 , α) · (P[→
v /→
x ], p)
→
−
R[β ? [π1 ]( v ),γ1 ]
−
−
(α [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) −−−−−−−−−+ε [(α [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) 7→ 1]
−
−
Jπ2 [→
v /→
x ]Kγ2 = π20
(γ1 6|= π20 or γ2 6|= π1 )
→
−
α [π1 ]( v ),γ1
−
(α [π2 ](→
x )σ .P, γ2 ) −−−−−−−+ε 0/
`
In-F2
2
(Q, γ) +
− ε C2
2
−
` 6= R[α ? [π 0 ](→
v ), γ]
`
(P + Q, γ) +
− ε C1 ⊕ C2
−
R[α ? [π 0 ](→
v ),γ]
In-F1
−
−
` 6= α [π1 ](→
v ), γ1 ` 6= R[β ? [π1 ](→
v ), γ1 ]
In-F3
`
−
(α [π ](→
x )σ .P, γ ) +
− 0/
`
(P, γ) +
− ε C1
In
ε
Plus
−
R[α ? [π 0 ](→
v ),γ]
(P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C1
(Q, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C2
Plus-F1
−
R[α ? [π 0 ](→
v ),γ]
(P + Q, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C1 + C2
`
(P, γ) +
− ε C1
`
(Q, γ) +
− ε C2
−
` 6= R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]
`
(P|Q, γ) +
− ε C1 |Q ⊕ P|C2
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
(P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C1
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
(Q, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C2
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
4
A=P
Par-F1
`
(P, γ) +
−ε C
−
` 6= R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]
`
([π]P, γ) +
−ε C
γ 6|= π
−
` 6= R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]
`
([π]P, γ) +
− ε 0/
(A, γ) +
−ε C
γ |= π
Guard
`
(P, γ) +
−ε C
`
(P|Q, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C1 |C2
γ |= π
Par
Rec
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
(P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε C
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
Guard-F1
([π]P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε [π]C
γ 6|= π
Guard-F2
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
([π]P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε [([π]P, γ) 7→ 1]
Table 2: Operational semantics of components (Part 2)
Guard-F3
L. Bortolussi et al.
25
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
Zero
`
(P, γ) −−−−−−→ε
−
` 6= R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]
`
`
(P, γ) →
−ε N
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
N1 −−−−−−→ε N1o
−
α [π]h→
v i,γ
N1 −−−−−−→ε N1
Comp
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
N2 −−−−−−→ε N2
B-In-Sync
N1 k N2 −−−−−−→ε N1 k N2
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
N2 −−−−−−→ε N2o
k
N2i ) ⊕ (N1i
−
α [π]h→
v i,γ
−
α [π]h→
v i,γ
Comp-B-In
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
N2 −−−−−−→ε (N1o
N2 −−−−−−→ε N2
N1 ⊕N2
⊕N1 +⊕N2
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
N1 −−−−−−→ε N1i
N1 k
N1 −−−−−−→ε N1
(P, γ) −−−−−−−−+ε N2
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
0→
− ε 0/
(P, γ) +
−ε N
−
R[α ? [π](→
v ),γ]
(P, γ) −−−−−−+ε N1
k
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
N2 −−−−−−→ε N2i
−
α [π](→
v ),γ
Out-Sync
N1 k N2 −−−−−−→ε N1 k N2 ⊕ N1 k N2
B-Sync
N2o )
−
α [π](→
v ),γ
N1 −−−−−−→ε N1
N2 −−−−−−→ε N2
−
α [π](→
v ),γ
In-Sync
N1 k N2 −−−−−−→ε N1 k N2 ⊕ N1 k N2
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i,γ]
−
α [π]h→
v i,γ
−
α [π](→
v ),γ
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i,γ]
−
α [π]h→
v i,γ
−
α [π](→
v ),γ
N1 −−−−−−−→ε N1s N1 −−−−−−→ε N1o N1 −−−−−−→ε N1i
N2 −−−−−−−→ε N2s N2 −−−−−−→ε N2o N2 −−−−−−→ε N2i
N1 k
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i,γ]
(N1s kN2 )·⊕N1i
N2 −−−−−−−→ε ⊕N
i
i
1 +⊕N2
⊕
(N1 kN2s )·⊕N2i
⊕N1i +⊕N2i
⊕
(N1o kN2i )
⊕N1i +⊕N2i
⊕
(N1i kN2o )
⊕N1i +⊕N2i
Sync
Table 3: Operational semantics of collective
Rule Rec is standard. The behaviour of ([π]P, γ) is regulated by rules Guard, Guard-F1, Guard-F2
and Guard-F3. The first two rules state that ([π]P, γ) behaves exactly like (P, γ) when γ satisfies predicate
π. However, in the first case the guard is removed when a transition is performed. In contrast, the guard
still remains active after the transition when a broadcast input is refused. This is similar to what we
consider for the rule Plus-F1 and models the fact that broadcast input refusals do not remove dynamic
operators. In rule Guard-F1 we let [π]C denote the function that maps each term of the form ([π]P, γ)
to C ((P, γ))) and any other term to 0, for each C : C OMP → R≥0 . Rules Guard-F2 and Guard-F3 state
that no component can be reached from ([π]P, γ) and all the broadcast messages are refused when γ does
not satisfy predicate π.
3.2
Operational semantics of collective
The operational semantics of a collective is defined via the transition relation →
− ε ⊆ C OL × L AB ×
[C OL → R≥0 ]. This relation is formally defined in Table 3. We use a straightforward adaptation of
the notations introduced in the previous section.
Rules Zero, Comp-B-In and Comp describe the behaviour of the single component at the level
of collective. Rule Zero is similar to rule Nil of Table 1 and states that inactive component 0 cannot
perform any action. Rule Comp-B-In states that the result of a broadcast input of a component at
the level of collective is obtained by combining (summing) the transition at the level of components
−
−
labelled α ? [π](→
v ), γ with the one labelled R[α ? [π](→
v ), γ]. This value is then renormalised to obtain a
probability distribution. There we use ⊕N to denote ∑N∈C OL N (N). The renormalisation guarantees a
reasonable computation of broadcast output synchronisation rates (see comments on rule B-Sync below).
26
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
Note that each component can always perform a broadcast input at the level of collective. However, we
are not able to observe if the message has been received or not. Moreover, thanks to renormalisation, if
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
C −−−−−−→ε N then ⊕N = 1, i.e. N is a probability distribution over C OL. Rule Comp simply states
that for the single component C 6= 0 all the transition labels that are not a broadcast input, the relation
`
`
→
− ε coincides with the relation +
− ε.
Rules B-In-Sync and B-Sync describe broadcast synchronisation. The former states that two collectives N1 and N2 that operate in parallel synchronise while performing a broadcast input. This models
the fact that the input can be potentially received by both of the collectives. In this rule we let N1 k N2
denote the function associating the value N1 (N1 ) · N2 (N2 ) with each term of the form N1 k N2 and 0 with
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
all the other terms. We can observe that if N −−−−−−→ε N then, as we have already observed for rule
Comp-B-In, ⊕N = 1 and N is in fact a probability distribution over C OL.
Rule B-Sync models the synchronisation consequent of a broadcast output performed at the level of
a collective. For each N1 : C OL → R≥0 and N2 : C OL → R≥0 , N1 ⊕ N2 denotes the function that maps
each term N to N1 (N) + N2 (N).
−
At the level of collective a transition labelled α ? [π]h→
v i, γ identifies the execution of a broadcast
output. When a collective of the form N1 k N2 is considered, the result of these kinds of transitions must
be computed (in the F U TS style) by considering:
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
• the broadcast output emitted from N1 , obtained by the transition N1 −−−−−−→ε N1o
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
• the broadcast input received by N1 , obtained by the transition N1 −−−−−−→ε N1i
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
• the broadcast output emitted from N2 , obtained by the transition N2 −−−−−−→ε N2o
−
α ? [π](→
v ),γ
• the broadcast input received by N2 , obtained by the transition N2 −−−−−−→ε N2i
Note that the first synchronises with the last to obtain N1o k N2i , while the second synchronises with the
third to obtain N1i k N2o . The result of such synchronisations are summed to model the race condition
between the broadcast outputs performed within N1 and N2 respectively. We have to remark that above
N1o (resp. N2o ) is 0/ when N1 (resp. N2 ) is not able to perform any broadcast output. Moreover, the label
of a broadcast synchronisation is again a broadcast output. This allows further synchronisations in a
derivation. Finally, it is easy to see that the total rate of a broadcast synchronisation is equal to the total
rate of broadcast outputs. This means that the number of receivers does not affect the rate of a broadcast
that is only determined by the number of senders.
Rules Out-Sync, In-Sync and Sync control the unicast synchronisation. Rule Out-Sync states that a
collective of the form N1 k N2 performs a unicast output if this is performed either in N1 or in N2 . This is
rendered in the operational semantics as an interleaving rule, where for each N : C OL → R≥0 , N k N2
denotes the function associating N (N1 ) with each collective of the form N1 k N2 and 0 with all other
collectives. Rule In-Sync is similar to Out-Sync. However, it considers unicast input.
Finally, rule Sync regulates the unicast synchronisations and generates transitions with labels of the
−
−
form τ[α [π]h→
v i, γ]. This is the result of a synchronisation between transitions labelled α [π](→
v ), γ, i.e.
→
−
an input, and α [π]h v i, γ, i.e. an output.
−
v i, γ]), unicast output
In rule Sync, Nks , Nko and Nki denote the result of synchronisation (τ[α [π]h→
→
−
→
−
(α [π]h v i, γ) and unicast input (α [π]( v ), γ) within Nk (k = 1, 2), respectively. The result of a transition
−
labelled τ[α [π]h→
v i, γ] is therefore obtained by combining:
• the synchronisations in N1 with N2 : N1s k N2 ;
L. Bortolussi et al.
27
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
ρ(γg , N) = ε = hµr , µ p , µu i N −−−−−−→ε N
µu (γg , α ? ) = (σ , N 0 )
−
α ? [π]h→
v i,γ
Sys-B
N in (γg , ρ) 7−−−−−−→ N k N 0 in (σ (γg ), ρ)
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i,γ]
ρ(γg , N) = ε = hµr , µ p , µu i N −−−−−−−→ε N
µu (γg , α) = (σ , N 0 )
−
τ[α [π]h→
v i,γ]
Sys
N in (γg , ρ) 7−−−−−−−→ N k N 0 in (σ (γg ), ρ)
Table 4: Operational Semantics of Systems.
• the synchronisations in N2 with N1 : N1 k N2s ;
• the output performed by N1 with the input performed by N2 : N1o k N2i ;
• the input performed by N1 with the output performed by N2 : N1i k N2o .
To guarantee a correct computation of synchronisation rates, the first two addendi are renormalised by
considering inputs performed in N2 and N1 respectively. This, on one hand, guarantees that the total rate
−
−
of synchronisation τ[α [π]h→
v i, γ] does not exceed the output capacity, i.e. the total rate of α [π]h→
v i, γ in
N1 and N2 . On the other hand, since synchronisation rates are renormalised during the derivation, it also
ensures that parallel composition is associative [7].
3.3
Operational semantics of systems
The operational semantics of systems is defined via the transition relation →
7− ⊆ S YS × L AB × [S YS →
R≥0 ] that is formally defined in Table 4. Only synchronisations are considered at the level of systems.
The first rule is Sys-B. This rule states that a system of the form N in (γg , ρ) can perform a broadcast
output when the collective N, under the environment evaluation ε = hµr , µ p , µu i = ρ(γg , N), can evolve
−
at the level of collective with the label α ? [π]h→
v i, γ to N . After the transition, the global store is updated
and a new collective can be created according to function µu . In rule Sys-B the following notations are
used. For each collective N2 , N : C OL → R≥0 , S : S YS → R≥0 and p ∈ Dist(Γ) we let N in (p, ρ)
denote the function mapping each system N in (γ, ρ) to N (N) · p(γ). The second rule is Sys that is
similar to Sys-B and regulates unicast synchronisations.
4
C ARMA at work
In this section we will use C ARMA to model a bike sharing system [6, 17]. These systems are a recent,
and increasingly popular, form of public transport in urban areas. As a resource-sharing system with
large numbers of independent users altering their behaviour due to pricing and other incentives, they
are a simple instance of a collective adaptive system, and hence a suitable case study to exemplify the
C ARMA language.
The idea in a bike sharing system is that bikes are made available in a number of stations that are
placed in various areas of a city. Users that plan to use a bike for a short trip can pick up a bike at a
suitable origin station and return it to any other station close to their planned destination. One of the
major issues in bike sharing systems is the availability and distribution of resources, both in terms of
available bikes at the stations and in terms of available empty parking places in the stations, where users
will park the bikes after using them.
28
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
In our scenario we assume that the city is partitioned in homogeneous zones and that all the stations
in the same zone can be equivalently used by any user in that zone. Below, we let {z0 , . . . , zn } be the n
zones in the city, each of which contains k parking stations.
Each parking station is modelled in C ARMA via a component of the form:
( G|R , {zone = `, bikes = i, slots = j})
where
• zone is the attribute identifying the zone where the parking station is located;
• bikes is the attribute used to count the number of available bikes;
• slots is the attribute containing the total number of parking slots in the parking station.
Processes G and R, which model the procedure to get and return a bike in the parking station, respectively, are defined as follow:
4
G = [bikes > 0] get[zone = this.zone]h•i{bikes ← bikes − 1}.G
4
R = [slots > bikes] ret[zone = this.zone]h•i{bikes ← bikes + 1}.R
Process G, when the value of attribute bikes is greater than 0, executes the unicast output with action
type get that potentially involves components satisfying the predicate zone = this.zone, i.e. the ones that
are located in the same zone3 . When the output is executed the value of the attribute bikes is decreased
by one to model the fact that one bike has been retrieved from the parking station.
Process R is similar. It executes the unicast output with action type ret that potentially involves
components satisfying predicate zone = this.zone. This action can be executed only when there is at
least one parking slot available, i.e. when the value of attribute bikes is less than the value of attribute
slots. When the output considered above is executed, the value of attribute bikes is increased by one to
model the fact that one bike has been returned in the parking station.
Users, who can be either bikers or pedestrians, are modelled via components of the form:
(Q, {zone = `})
where zone is the attribute indicating where the user is located, while Q models the current state of the
user and can be one of the following processes:
4
B = move? [⊥]h•i{zone ← U(z0 , . . . , zn )}.B
+ stop? [⊥]h•i.W S
4
W S = ret[zone = this.zone](•).P
4
P = go? [⊥]h•i.W S
4
W B = get[zone = this.zone](•).B
Process B represents a biker. When a user is in this state (s)he can either move from the current zone
to another zone or stop to return the bike to a parking station. These activities are modelled with the
3 Here
we use • to denote the unit value.
L. Bortolussi et al.
29
10
Min. bikes per Park
Max. bikes per Park
Avg. bikes per Park
Bikes
8
6
4
2
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Time
Figure 1: Simulation of bike scenario.
execution of a broadcast output via action types move and stop, respectively. Note that in both of these
cases, the predicate used to identify the target of the actions is ⊥, denoting the value false. This means
that neither of the two actions actually synchronise with any component (since no component satisfies
⊥). This kind of interaction is used in C ARMA to model spontaneous actions, i.e. actions that render the
execution of an activity and that do no require synchronisation. After the broadcast move? the value of attribute zone is updated by randomly selecting the next zone in {z0 , . . . , zn }. With {zone ← U(z0 , . . . , zn )}
we denote the update σ such that σ (γ) is the probability distribution giving probability n1 to each store
γ[zone ← zi ]. This update models a random movement of the user among the city zones.
When process B executes broadcast stop? , it evolves to process W S. This process models a user who
is waiting for a parking slot. This process executes an input over ret. This models the fact that the user
has found a parking station with an available parking slot in their zone. After the execution of this input
process P is executed. The latter component definition models a pedestrian user. The user remains in this
state until the spontaneous action go? is performed. After that it evolves to process W B which models a
user waiting for a bike. The behaviour of W B is similar to that of W S described above.
Using a custom-built prototype simulator, we are able to simulate this modelled scenario. The output
on one simulation run is presented in Figure 1. In the graph we show the minimum, average and maximum number of bikes in one zone of the city. We consider a scenario with four zones each containing
four parking stations. The total number of users is 150.
5
Conclusions
We have presented C ARMA, a new stochastic process algebra for the representation of systems developed in the CAS paradigm. The language offers a rich set of communication primitives, and the use of
attributes, captured in a store associated with each component, allows attribute-based communication.
For most CAS systems we anticipate that one of the attributes will be the location of the agent and thus it
is straightforward to capture systems in which, for example, there is a limited scope of communication,
or restriction to only interact with components that are co-located. As demonstrated in the case study
presented in Section 4, attributes can also be used to capture the "state" of a component, such as the
available number of bikes/slots at a bike station.
C ARMA reflects the experience that we have gained through earlier languages such as SCEL [8],
its Markovian variants [14] and PALOMA [9]. Compared with SCEL, the representation of knowledge
here is more abstract, and not designed for detailed reasoning during the evolution of the model. This
30
C ARMA: Collective Adaptive Resource-sharing Markovian Agents
reflects the different objectives of the languages. Whilst SCEL is designed to support the programming
of autonomic computing systems, the primary focus of C ARMA is quantitative analysis. In stochastic
process algebras such as PEPA, MTIPP and EMPA, data is typically abstracted away, and the influence of
data on behaviour is captured only stochastically. When the data is important to differentiate behaviour
it must be implicitly encoded in the state of components. In the context of CAS we wish to support
attribute-based communication to reflect the flexible and dynamic interactions that occur in such systems.
Thus it is not possible to entirely abstract from data. On the other hand, the level of abstraction means
that choices within the system will be captured stochastically rather than through the rich policies for
reasoning offered by SCEL. We believe that this offers a reasonable compromise between expressiveness
and tractability. Another key feature of C ARMA is the inclusion of an explicit environment in which
components interact. In PALOMA there was a rudimentary form of environment, termed the perception
function but this proved cumbersome to use, and it could not itself be influenced by the behaviour of
the components. In C ARMA, in contrast, the environment not only modulates the rates and probabilities
related to interactions between components, it can also itself evolve at runtime, due to feedback from the
collective.
The focus of this paper has been the discrete semantics in the structured operational style of FUTS
[7], but in future work we plan to develop differential semantics in the style of [16]. This latter approach
will be essential in order to support quantitative analysis of CAS systems of realistic scale, but it may
not be possible to encompass the full rich set of language features of C ARMA with such efficient analysis. Further work is needed to investigate this issue, and which language features can be supported for
the various forms of quantitative analysis available. Additional work involves the development of an
appropriate high-level language for designers of CAS which will be mapped to the process algebra, and
hence will enable qualitative and quantitive analysis of CAS during system development by enabling a
design workflow and analysis pathway. The intention of this high-level language is not to add to the
expressiveness of C ARMA, which we believe to be well-suited to capturing the behaviour of CAS, but
rather to ease the task of modelling for users who are unfamiliar with process algebra and similar formal
notations.
Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by the EU project QUANTICOL, 600708. This research has also been
partially funded by the German Research Council (DFG) as part of the Cluster of Excellence on Multimodal Computing and Interaction at Saarland University.
References
[1] Yehia Abd Alrahman, Rocco De Nicola, Michele Loreti, Francesco Tiezzi & Roberto Vigo (2015): A Calculus for Attribute-based Communication. In: Proceedings of SAC 2015, doi:10.1145/2695664.2695668. To
appear.
[2] Marco Bernardo & Roberto Gorrieri (1998): A Tutorial on EMPA: A Theory of Concurrent Processes with
Nondeterminism, Priorities, Probabilities and Time. Theoretical Computer Science 202(1-2), pp. 1–54,
doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00127-8.
[3] H.C. Bohnenkamp, P.R. D’Argenio, H. Hermanns & J-P. Katoen (2006): MODEST: A Compositional Modeling Formalism for Hard and Softly Timed Systems. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 32(10), pp. 812–830,
doi:10.1109/TSE.2006.104.
L. Bortolussi et al.
31
[4] Luca Bortolussi & Alberto Policriti (2010): Hybrid dynamics of stochastic programs. Theor. Comput. Sci.
411(20), pp. 2052–2077, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2010.02.008.
[5] Federica Ciocchetta & Jane Hillston (2009): Bio-PEPA: A Framework for the Modelling and Analysis of
Biological Systems. Theoretical Computer Science 410(33), pp. 3065–3084, doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2009.02.037.
[6] Paola De Maio (2009): Bike-sharing: Its History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future. Journal of
Public Transportation 12(4), pp. 41–56, doi:10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3.
[7] Rocco De Nicola, Diego Latella, Michele Loreti & Mieke Massink (2013): A uniform definition of stochastic
process calculi. ACM Comput. Surv. 46(1), p. 5, doi:10.1145/2522968.2522973.
[8] Rocco De Nicola, Michele Loreti, Rosario Pugliese & Francesco Tiezzi (2014): A Formal Approach to
Autonomic Systems Programming: The SCEL Language. TAAS 9(2), p. 7, doi:10.1145/2619998.
[9] Cheng Feng & Jane Hillston (2014): PALOMA: A Process Algebra for Located Markovian Agents. In:
Quantitative Evaluation of Systems - 11th International Conference, QEST 2014, Florence, Italy, September
8-10, 2014. Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8657, Springer, pp. 265–280, doi:10.1007/9783-319-10696-0_22.
[10] Daniel T Gillespie (1976): A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of
coupled chemical reactions. Journal of Computational Physics 22(4), pp. 403 – 434, doi:10.1016/00219991(76)90041-3.
[11] Holger Hermanns, Ulrich Herzog & Joost-Pieter Katoen (2002): Process algebra for performance evaluation.
Theor. Comput. Sci. 274(1-2), pp. 43–87, doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(00)00305-4.
[12] Holger Hermanns & Michael Rettelbach (1994): Syntax, Semantics, Equivalences and Axioms for MTIPP.
In U. Herzog & M. Rettelbach, editors: Proc. of 2nd Process Algebra and Performance Modelling Workshop.
[13] Jane Hillston (1995): A Compositional Approach to Performance Modelling. CUP.
[14] Diego Latella, Michele Loreti, Mieke Massink & Valerio Senni (2014): Stochastically timed predicate-based
communication primitives for autonomic computing. In Nathalie Bertrand & Luca Bortolussi, editors: Proceedings Twelfth International Workshop on Quantitative Aspects of Programming Languages and Systems,
QAPL 2014, Grenoble, France, 12-13 April 2014., EPTCS 154, pp. 1–16, doi:10.4204/EPTCS.154.1.
[15] Corrado Priami (1995): Stochastic π-calculus.
The Computer Journal 38(7), pp. 578–589,
doi:10.1093/comjnl/38.7.578.
[16] Mirco Tribastone, Stephen Gilmore & Jane Hillston (2012): Scalable Differential Analysis of Process Algebra Models. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 38(1), pp. 205–219, doi:10.1109/TSE.2010.82.
[17] Wikipedia (2013): Bicycle sharing system — Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at http:
//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bicycle_sharing_system&oldid=573165089. [Online;
accessed 17-September-2013].
| 6cs.PL
|
AN INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION OF HITCHIN
SPECTRAL CURVES
arXiv:1705.05969v1 [math.AG] 17 May 2017
OLIVIA DUMITRESCU AND MOTOHICO MULASE
Abstract. This article consists of two parts. In Part 1, we present a formulation of twodimensional topological quantum field theories in terms of a functor from a category of Ribbon
graphs to the endofuntor category of a monoidal category. The key point is that the category of
ribbon graphs produces all Frobenius objects. Necessary backgrounds from Frobenius algebras,
topological quantum field theories, and cohomological field theories are reviewed. A result on
Frobenius algebra twisted topological recursion is included at the end of Part 1.
In Part 2, we explain a geometric theory of quantum curves. The focus is placed on the process
of quantization as a passage from families of Hitchin spectral curves to families of opers. To make
the presentation simpler, we unfold the story using SL2 (C)-opers and rank 2 Higgs bundles defined
on a compact Riemann surface C of genus greater than 1. In this case, quantum curves, opers,
and projective structures in C all become the same notion. Background materials on projective
coordinate systems, Higgs bundles, opers, and non-Abelian Hodge correspondence are explained.
Contents
0.
Part
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Preface: An inspiration from the past
2
1. Topological Quantum Field Theory
Frobenius algebras
TQFT
Cohomological field theory
Category of cell graphs
2D TQFT from cell graphs
TQFT-valued topological recursion
Part 2. Quantization of Higgs Bundles
7. Quantum curves
8. Projective structures, opers, and Higgs bundles
9. Semi-classical limit of SL2 (C)-opers
10. Non-Abelian Hodge correspondence between Hitchin moduli spaces
References
5
5
9
13
21
26
29
33
33
36
47
48
50
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 14H15, 14N35, 81T45; Secondary: 14F10, 14J26, 33C05,
33C10, 33C15, 34M60, 53D37.
Key words and phrases. Topological quantum field theory; quantum curves; opers; Hitchin moduli spaces; Higgs
bundles; Hitchin section; quantization; topological recursion.
1
2
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
0. Preface: An inspiration from the past
A recent discovery of a cuneiform tablet dated around 350 to 50 B.C.E. suggests that
ancient Babylonians must have used geometry of time-momentum space to establish accurate calculations of Jupiter’s orbit [87]. This impressive paper also contains the picture of
the tablet which describes the Babylonian’s method of integration.
Figure 0.1. The cuneiform tablet used in the analysis of [87].
The orbit of the Jupiter is a graph in coordinate space-time. By considering the graph of
momentum of the Jupiter in time-momentum space, Babylonians visualized integral of the
momentum by the area underneath the curve, and using a trapezoidal approximation, they
actually obtained an estimated value of the integral. This gives a prototype of Newton’s
Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. This idea of Babylonians relating geometry of timemomentum space with the analysis of actual orbit of the Jupiter is striking, because it
suggests their equal treatment of coordinate space the momentum space. Although it is a
stretch, we could imagine the very foundation of symplectic geometry here.
Many mathematical cuneiform tablets recording numbers and algebraic calculations have
been our source of imagination. The most famous is Plimpton 322 of around 1,800 B.C.E.
(see Figure 0.2). It lists 15 Pythagorean numbers in the increasing order of hypotenuse
angles from about 45 degrees to 60 degrees [88].
Figure 0.2. Plimton 322
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
3
Babylonians seem to have known an algorithm to calculate an approximate value of the
square root of any √
number. For example, there is a cuneiform tablet that shows the sexagesimal expansion of 2. Although there have been many speculations for practical purposes
of Plimton 322 and mechanisms to come up with the listed numbers, our imagination goes
to the surprise of the creator of the tablet. For the pair of numbers (y, z) listed in the
second and the third columns, z 2 − y 2 is always a perfect square. Therefore, the square root
algorithm terminates in a finite number of steps for these values, and gives an exact answer.
They must have found a finiteness in the forest of infinity. This is a strong sentiment that
resonates with our mind today.
The tablet of Figure 0.1 does not show any geometry. The author of [87] convincingly
argues that behind the list of these seemingly meaningless numbers on the tablets, there
is a profound geometric investigation of the planetary motion. Our imagination is piqued
by the discovery: the interplay between algebra, geometry, and astronomy; and the equal
treatment of momentum space and coordinate space. What the feeling of the authors of the
tablet would have been, when they were creating it? It must have been a sharp happiness
of discovery that mathematics correctly predicts the very nature surrounding us, such as
planetary motion.
The accuracy of calculations of Babylonians is another astonishment, in addition to the
lack of pictures. It is in sharp contrast to Euclid’s Elements, which was written around
the same time in Greece. In Elements, we see many beautiful geometric pictures, and
proofs. The discovery of axiomatic method culminated in it. This dichotomy, being able
to calculate a quantity to a high precision, vs. having a proof of the formula based on
a finiteness property, is our very motivation of writing these notes. There are a lot of
amazing formulas around us in the direction that we describe. At this moment, we do not
have the final understanding of them, yet.
In the first part of these lectures, we explore two-dimensional topological quantum field
theories formulated in terms of cell graphs. A cell graph of type (g, n) is the 1-skeleton of a
cell-decomposition of a compact oriented topological surface of genus g ≥ 0 with n labeled
0-cells, or vertices. Such graphs are called in many different names: ribbon graphs, dessins
d’enfants, maps, embedded graphs, etc. We use the terminology “cell graph” indicating the
different nature of the graphs on surfaces, which record degeneration of surfaces. Although
a cell graph is a 1-dimensional object, the notion of a face is well defined as a 2-cell of the
cell decomposition that the cell graph defines on a given surface.
The degree of a vertex of a cell graph is the number of incident half-edges. We call a
1-cell an edge of the graph. As explained in our previous lecture notes [30], the number of
1
Cm , where
cell graphs of type (0, 1) with the unique vertex of degree 2m is 2m
1
2m
Cm =
m+1 m
is the m-th Catalan number. A generating function
∞
X
Cm
z = z(x) =
m=0
1
x2m+1
of Catalan numbers satisfies an algebraic equation
1
(0.0.1)
x=z+ .
z
The story of [30, Section 2] tells us that enumeration problem of cell graphs of arbitrary
type (g, n) is solved by the quantization of the algebraic curve (0.0.1). The key formula
4
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
for the quantization comes from the Laplace transform of a combinatorial equation [30,
Catalan Recursion, Section 2.1]. There, the combinatorial formula is derived by analyzing
the effect of edge-contraction operations on cell graphs.
The new story we wish to tell in these lectures is that the category of cell graphs carries
the information of all two-dimensional topological quantum field theories. In Part 1 of this
article, we will present an axiomatic setup of 2D TQFT. The key idea is simple: exact same
edge-contraction operations characterize Frobenius algebras. When we contract an edge of
a cell graph, two vertices collide. It represents multiplication. When we shrink a loop, since
it is a cycle on the topological surface, the process breaks a vertex into two vertices. This
is the operation of comultiplication. The topological structure of a cell graph makes these
operations dual to one another in the context of Frobenius algebras.
We start with defining Frobenius algebras. Topological quantum field theories (TQFT)
and cohomological field theories (CohFT) are introduced in the following sections. A category of cell graphs is defined. We explain that this category generates all Frobenius algebras.
We then make a connection between cell graphs and 2D TQFT. The theory of topological
recursion is a leitmotiv in this article. It is another manifestation of a quantization procedure. Since there are many review articles on topological recursion, we touch the subject
only tangentially in this article. Our new result related to this topic is the 2D TQFT-twisted
topological recursion, which is explained in the end of Part 1.
The cohomology ring of a closed oriented manifold X is a Frobenius algebra. When we
consider an even dimensional manifold and only even degree cohomologies
(0.0.2)
A = H even (X, Q),
then we have a commutative Frobenius algebra, which is equivalent to a 2D TQFT. The
Gromov-Witten invariants of X of genus 0 determine a quantum deformation of the ring A,
known as the big quantum cohomology. This quantum structure then defines a holomorphic
object Y , the mirror of X. Thus the holomorphic geometry of Y captures quantum cohomology of X. Gromov-Witten invariants are generalized to arbitrary genera. Here arises a
question:
Question 0.1. What should be the holomorphic geometry on Y that corresponds to highergenus Gromov-Witten theory of X?
If we consider the passage from genus 0 to higher genera Gromov-Witten theory as
quantization, then on the side on Y , we need a quantized holomorphic geometry. A good
candidate is the D-module theory. The simplest such theory fitting to this context is the
notion of quantum curves. The relation between quantum curves and B-model geometry
is considered in [2, 19, 17, 27, 28, 30, 49, 50] and others. The key point for this idea to
work is when the holomorphic geometry Y corresponding to the Gromov-Witten theory of
X is captured by an algebraic or analytic curve. These curves often appear in other areas
of mathematics as spectral curves, such as integrable systems, random matrix theory, and
Hitchin’s theory of Higgs bundles. A spectral curve naturally comes with a projection to a
base curve, making it a covering of the base curve. A quantum curve is a D-module on this
base curve, quantizing the spectral curve.
Since a CohFT based on the Frobenius algebra H even (X, Q) plays a role similar to
Gromov-Witten theory of X, CohFT is a quantization of 2D TQFT. This process consists of two steps of quantizations. The first one is from the classical cohomology ring A to
its quantum deformation, which is the mirror geometry. If the mirror is a curve, then the
second step should be parallel to the quantization of a spectral curve to a quantum curve.
We may be able to understand the reconstruction [36] of CohFT based on a semi-simple
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
5
Frobenius algebra from the 2D TQFT, that is obtained as the degree 0 part of the cohomology H 0 (Mg,n , Q) of the moduli space of stable curves, analogous to the construction of
quantum curves.
Part 2 deals with quantum curves. Since the authors have produced a long article [30]
explaining the relation between quantum curves and topological recursion, the present article is focused on geometry of the process of quantization of Hitchin spectral curves from a
perspective of opers. Instead of providing a general theory of [25, 26, 31], we use SL2 (C)
to explain our ideas here. We will show that the classical notion of projective structures on
a compact Riemann surface C of genus g ≥ 2 studied by Gunning [51], SL2 (C)-opers, and
quantum curves of Hitchin spectral curves, are indeed the exact same notion. A conjecture
of Gaiotto [42] relating non-Abelian Hodge correspondence and opers, together with its
solution by [26], will be briefly explained in the final section.
Acknowledgement. The authors are grateful to the organizers of the Warsaw Advanced
School on Topological Quantum Field Theory for providing the opportunity to produce this
article. They are in particular indebted to Piotr Sulkowski for constant encouragement and
patience.
The joint research of authors presented in this article is carried out while they have been
staying in the following institutions in the last four years: the American Institute of Mathematics in California, the Banff International Research Station, Institutul de Matematică
“Simion Stoilow” al Academiei Rom ane, Institut Henri Poincaré, Institute for Mathematical Sciences at the National University of Singapore, Kobe University, Leibniz Universität
Hannover, Lorentz Center Leiden, Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, MaxPlanck-Institut für Mathematik-Bonn, and Osaka City University Advanced Mathematical
Institute. Their generous financial support, hospitality, and stimulating research environments are greatly appreciated.
The research of O.D. has been supported by GRK 1463 Analysis, Geometry, and String
Theory at the Leibniz Universität Hannover, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
in Waterloo, and a grant from MPIM-Bonn. The research of M.M. has been supported
by IHÉS, MPIM-Bonn, Simons Foundation, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, and NSF grants DMS-1104734, DMS-1309298,
DMS-1619760, DMS-1642515, and NSF-RNMS: Geometric Structures And Representation
Varieties (GEAR Network, DMS-1107452, 1107263, 1107367).
Part 1. Topological Quantum Field Theory
1. Frobenius algebras
Throughout this article, we denote by K a field of characteristic 0. Most of the cases
we consider K = Q or K = C. Let A be a finite-dimensional, unital, and associative
algebra defined over a field K. A bialgebra comes with an extra set of structures, including
a comultiplication. Examples of bialgebras include the group algebra A = K[G] of a finite
group G. Its algebra structure is canonically determined by the multiplication rule of G.
However, the group algebra has two distinct co-algebra structures. One of which makes K[G]
a Frobenius algebra, and the other makes it a Hopf algebra. This difference is reflected in
which topological invariants we are dealing with. The Frobenius structure is useful for twodimensional topology, and the Hopf structure is natural for three-dimensional topological
invariants.
Let us start with defining Frobenius algebras.
6
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Definition 1.1 (Frobenius algebras). A finite-dimensional, unital, and associative algebra
A over a field K is a Frobenius algebra if there exists a linear map : A −→ K called
counit such that for every u ∈ A, (ux) = 0, or (xu) = 0, for all x ∈ A implies that u = 0.
Proposition 1.2. If A1 and A2 are Frobenius algebras, then A1 ⊕ A2 and A1 ⊗ A2 are also
Frobenius algebras. Let us denote by A the category of Frobenius algebras defined over K.
Then C = (A, ⊗, K) is a monoidal category.
Proof. Denote by i : Ai −→ K the counit of Ai , i = 1, 2. Then (A1 ⊕ A2 , 1 + 2 ) is a
Frobenius algebra. Similarly,
1 · 2 : A1 ⊗ A2 3 u1 ⊗ u2 7−→ 1 (u1 )2 (u2 ) ∈ K
makes A1 ⊗ A2 a Frobenius algebra.
Example 1.3. The one-dimensional vector space A = K, with the identity map (u) = u, is
a simple commutative Frobenius algebra. More generally, by taking the direct sum A = K ⊕n
and defining (u1 , . . . , un ) = u1 + · · · + un ∈ K, we construct a semi-simple commutative
Frobenius algebra K ⊕n .
Example 1.4. The full matrix algebra A = Matn (K) consisting of n × n matrices with
(u) = trace(u) is an example of a non-commutative simple Frobenius algebra for n ≥ 2.
Example 1.5. As mentioned above, the group algebra A = K[G] of a finite group G is a
Frobenius algebra. Here, we define : K[G] −→ K by linearly extending the map whose
value for every g ∈ G is given by
(
1
g=1
(g) =
0
g 6= 1.
Remark 1.6. If we define (g) = 1 for all g ∈ G, then the group algebra becomes a Hopf
algebra.
Example 1.7. The cohomology ring H ∗ (M, R) of an oriented compact differential manifold
M of dimR M = n with the cup product and
: H ∗ (M, R) −→ H n (M, R) = R
is a Frobenius algebra.
The above example makes us wonder if an analogue of Poincaré pairing exists in a general
Frobenius algebra. Indeed, the counterpart is a Frobenius bilinear form defined by
(1.0.1)
η : A ⊗ A −→ K,
η(u, v) = (uv)
in terms of the counit : A −→ K. The Frobenius form satisfies the Frobenius associativity
(1.0.2)
η(uv, w) = η(u, vw),
u, v, w ∈ A.
The condition for the counit of Definition 1.1 exactly means that the Frobenius form η is
non-degenerate. It therefore defines a canonical isomorphism
(1.0.3)
∼
λ : A −→ A∗ ,
hλ(u), vi = η(u, v),
u, v ∈ A.
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
7
The isomorphism introduces a unique comultiplication δ : A −→ A ⊗ A by the following
commutative diagram:
(1.0.4)
δ
A
λ
/ A⊗A
A∗
m∗
λ⊗λ .
/ A∗ ⊗ A∗
Here, m∗ : A∗ −→ A∗ ⊗ A∗ is the dual of the multiplication operation m : A ⊗ A −→ A in
A. Since we are not assuming the multiplication to be commutative, we define the natural
pairing
(A∗ ⊗ A∗ ) ⊗ (A ⊗ A) −→ K
by observing the order of entities as written. For example, for α, β ∈ A∗ and u, v ∈ A, we
calculate
(1.0.5)
hα ⊗ β, u ⊗ vi = hα, hβ, uivi = hβ, uihα, vi.
As the dual of the associative multiplication, the comultiplication δ is coassociative, i.e., it
satisfies
A8 ⊗ A
(1.0.6)
δ
δ⊗1
&
A ⊗8 A ⊗ A.
A
&
δ
1⊗δ
A⊗A
Note that the identity element 1 ∈ A corresponds to ∈ A∗ by λ, i.e., λ(1) = . This is
because
η(1, u) = η(u, 1) = (u).
We now have the full set of data (A, 1, m, , δ) that defines a bialgebra. The algebra and
coalgebra structures satisfy a compatibility condition, as described below.
Proposition 1.8. The following diagram commutes:
(1.0.7)
1⊗δ
A⊗A
A⊗
8 A⊗A
/A
m
δ⊗1
&
m⊗1
&
/ A ⊗ A.
8
δ
1⊗m
A⊗A⊗A
Remark 1.9. Alternatively, we can define a Frobenius algebra as a bialgebra satisfying
(1.0.7), together with a non-degenerate Frobenius form satisfying (1.0.2).
Proof. Let he1 , e2 , . . . , er i be a K-basis for A, where r = dimK A. The bilinear form η
defines r × r matrices
(1.0.8)
η = [ηij ],
η −1 = [η ij ],
ηij := η(ei , ej ).
8
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
It gives the canonical basis expansion of v ∈ A:
X
X
(1.0.9)
v=
η(v, ea )η ab eb =
η(ea , v)η ba eb .
a,b
a,b
From (1.0.4), we calculate
δ(v) =
X
η(v, ei ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea )
i,j,a,b
=
X
=
X
η(vei , ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea )
i,j,a,b
(vei ) ⊗ (η ia ea )
i,a
= (m ⊗ 1)(v ⊗ δ(1)),
using the pairing convention (1.0.5) and
(1.0.10)
δ(1) =
X
η ab ea ⊗ eb .
a,b
We then have
(1 ⊗ m) ◦ (δ ⊗ 1)(u ⊗ v) = (1 ⊗ m)
X
η(u, ei ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea ) ⊗ v
i,j,a,b
=
X
η(uei , ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea v)
i,j,a,b
=
X
η(uei , ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ η ia η(ea v, ec )η cd ed
i,j,a,b,c,d
=
X
uei ⊗ η ia η(ea , vec )η cd ed
i,a,c,d
=
X
(uvec ) ⊗ η cd ed
c,d
= (m ⊗ 1)(uv ⊗ δ(1)) = δ(uv).
Similarly,
(m ⊗ 1) ◦ (1 ⊗ δ)(u ⊗ v) = (m ⊗ 1) u ⊗
X
η(v, ei ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea )
i,j,a,b
=
X
uη(vei , ej )(η jb eb ) ⊗ (η ia ea )
i,j,a,b
=
X
uvei ⊗ η ia ea
i,a
= (m ⊗ 1)(uv ⊗ δ(1)) = δ(uv).
This completes the proof of Proposition 1.8.
Remark 1.10. We note that if A is commutative, then the quantities
(1.0.11)
η ei1 · · · eij , eij+1 · · · en = (ei1 · · · ein ),
1 ≤ j < n,
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
9
are completely symmetric with respect to permutations of indices.
Definition 1.11 (Euler element). The Euler element of a Frobenius algebra A is defined
by
(1.0.12)
e := m ◦ δ(1).
In terms of basis, the Euler element is given by
X
(1.0.13)
e=
η ab ea eb .
a,b
The Euler element provides the genus expansion of 2D TQFT, allowing us to calculate
higher genus correlation functions from the genus 0 part of the theory.
Another application of (1.0.9) is the following formula that relates the multiplication and
comultiplication:
(1.0.14)
(λ(u) ⊗ 1) δ(v) = uv.
This is because
(λ(u) ⊗ 1) δ(v) = (λ(u) ⊗ 1)
X
(vη ab ea ) ⊗ eb
a,b
=
X
=
X
η(u, vea )η ab eb
a,b
η(uv, ea )η ab eb = uv.
a,b
2. TQFT
In this section, we briefly review TQFT. Although there have been explosive mathematical developments in higher dimensional topological quantum field theories mixing different
dimensions during the last decade (see for example, [13, 67] and more recent work inspired
by them), we restrict our attention to the two-dimensional speciality in these lectures. From
now on, Frobenius algebras we consider are finite-dimensional, unital, associative, and commutative. It has been established (see [1, 16]) that 2D TQFT’s are classified by these types
of Frobenius algebras.
The axiomatic formulation of conformal and topological quantum field theories was discovered in the 1980s by Atiyah [4] and Segal [89]. A (d−1)-dimensional TQFT is a monoidal
functor Z from the monoidal category of (d − 1)-dimensional closed (i.e., compact without
boundary) oriented smooth manifolds with oriented d-dimensional cobordism as morphisms,
to the monoidal category of finite-dimensional vector spaces defined over a field K. The
monoidal structure in the category of (d − 1)-dimensional smooth manifolds is defined by
the operation of taking disjoint union, which is a symmetric operation. Disjoint union with
the empty set is the identity of this operation. Therefore, we define the monoidal category
of K-vector spaces by symmetric tensor products, with the field K serving as the identity
operation of tensor product. The functor Z satisfies the non-triviality condition
Z(∅) = K,
and maps a disjoint union of smooth (d − 1)-dimensional manifolds to a symmetric tensor
product of vector spaces.
10
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Let us denote by M an oriented closed smooth manifold of dimension d − 1, and by
M op the same manifold with the opposite orientation. The functor Z satisfies the duality
condition
Z(M op ) = Z(M )∗ ,
where Z(M )∗ is the dual vector space of Z(M ). Suppose we have an oriented bordered
d-dimensional smooth manifold N . The boundary ∂N is a smooth manifold of dimension
d − 1, and the complement N \ ∂N is an oriented smooth manifold of dimension d. We give
the orientation induced from N to its boundary ∂N . The TQFT functor Z then gives an
element
Z(N ) ∈ Z(∂N ).
If N is closed, i.e., ∂N = ∅, then
Z(N ) ∈ Z(∅) = K
is a number that represents a topological invariant of N .
Now consider a bordered oriented smooth manifold N1 with boundary
∂N1 = M1op t M2 ,
meaning that the two separate boundaries carry different orientations. We choose that M2
is given the induced orientation from N1 , and M1 the opposite orientation. We interpret
the situation as N1 giving an oriented cobordism from M1 to M2 . In this case, the functor
Z defines an element Z(N1 ) ∈ Z(M1 )∗ ⊗ Z(M2 ), or equivalently, a linear map
Z(N1 ) : Z(M1 ) −→ Z(M2 ).
Suppose we have another smooth manifold N2 with boundary
∂N2 = M2op t M3
corresponding to a linear map
Z(N2 ) : Z(M2 ) −→ Z(M3 ).
We can then smoothly glue N1 and N2 along the common boundary component M2 forming
a new manifold
N = N1 ∪M2 N2 .
Clearly
∂N = M1op t M3 ,
and N gives a cobordism from M1 to M3 . The Atiyah-Segal sewing axiom [4] asserts that
(2.0.1)
Z(M1 )
k
Z(M1 )
Z(N1 )
/ Z(M2 )
Z(N2 )
Z(N )
/ Z(M3 )
k
/ Z(M3 ).
A d-dimensional TQFT Z defines a topological invariant Z(N ) for each closed d-manifold
N . The essence of TQFT is to break N into simpler pieces by cutting along (d − 1)dimensional submanifolds, and represent the invariant Z(N ) from that of simpler pieces.
The situation is special for the case of 2D TQFT. First of all, we already know all topological
invariants of a closed surface. They are just functions of the genus g of the surface. So there
should be no reason for another theory to study them. Since there is only one 1-dimensional
connected compact smooth manifold, a 2D TQFT is based on a single vector space
(2.0.2)
Z(S 1 ) = A,
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
11
and its tensor products. What else could we gain?
The biggest surprise is that a 2D TQFT is further quantized [15, 24, 48, 63]. This
process starts with a Frobenius algebra A of (0.0.2). It is quantized to a quantum cohomology, and then further to Gromov-Witten invariants. Construction of spectral curves, and
then quantizing them, have a parallelism to this story. This is the story we now explore in
this and the next sections, but only to take a snapshot of the converse direction, i.e., from
a quantum theory to a classical theory.
Let us denote by Σg,m̄,n a connected, bordered, oriented, smooth surface of genus g with
m + n boundary circles. This is a surface obtained by removing m + n disjoint open discs
from a compact oriented two-dimensional smooth manifold of genus g without boundary.
We assume that the boundary of Σg,m̄,n itself is a smooth manifold, hence it is a disjoint
union of m + n circles. We give the induced orientation from the surface to n boundary
circles, and the opposite orientation to the m boundary circles. The surface Σg,m̄,n gives a
cobordism of m circles to n circles. The orientation-preserving diffeomorphism class of such
a surface is determined by the genus g and the two number m and n of boundary circles
with different orientations. Therefore, the oriented equivalence class of cobordism is also
determined by (g, m, n). The TQFT functor Z then assigns to each cobordism Σg,m̄,n a
multilinear map
def
ωg,m̄,n = Z(Σg,m̄,n ) : A⊗m −→ A⊗n ,
which is completely determined by the label (g, m, n). This is the special situation of the
two-dimensionality of TQFT, reflecting the simple topological classification of surfaces.
Suppose we have another cobordism Σh,k̄,m of genus h from k circles to m circles, with
orientation on the m circles induced from the surface, and the opposite orientation on
k circles. We can compose two cobordisms, sewing the m circles of the first cobordism
with the m circles of the second. Here, we notice that on each pair of circles, one from
the first surface and the other from the second, the orientations are the same, and hence
we can put one on top of the other. Therefore, the orientations of the two surfaces are
consistent after sewing. This sewing process generates a new surface Σg+h+m−1,k̄,n of genus
g + h + m − 1. This is because the m pairs of circles sewed together create m − 1 handles
(see Figure 2.1). The sewing axiom of Atiyah-Segal [4] then requires that the functor
Z associates the composition of linear maps to the composition of cobordisms. In our
situation, the composition of two maps generates a new map
ωg,m̄,n ◦ ωh,k̄,m = ωg+h+m−1,k̄,n : A⊗k −→ A⊗n ,
corresponding to the sewing of cobordisms.
Figure 2.1. A string of String Interactions. The physics of a simple model for
interacting strings is captured by the sewing axiom of Atiyah-Segal.
The sewing procedure can be generalized, allowing partial sewing of the boundary circles
of matching orientation. For example, if j ≤ ` and j ≤ m, then gluing only j pairs of circles,
12
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
we have a composition
(2.0.3)
ωg,m̄,n ◦ ωh,k̄,` = ωg+h+j−1,k+m−j,n+`−j : A⊗k+m−j −→ A⊗n+`−j .
Furthermore, since TQFT does not require cobordism to be given by a connected manifold,
we can stack up disjoint union of surfaces and apply partial sewing to create a variety of
linear maps from A⊗n to A⊗m .
It was Dijkgraaf [16] who noticed the equivalence between 2D TQFTs and commutative
Frobenius algebras. We can see the resemblance immediately. On the vector space A, we
have operations defined by
(2.0.4)
1 = ω0,0̄,1 : K −→ A,
m = ω0,2̄,1 : A⊗2 −→ A,
= ω0,1̄,0 : A −→ K,
δ = ω0,1̄,2 : A −→ A⊗2 ,
η = ω0,2̄,0 : A⊗2 −→ K.
A connected cobordism of m incoming circles and n outgoing circles is classified by the genus
g of the surface. It does not depend on the history of how the cobordisms are glued together.
Thus the diffeomorphism classes of surfaces after sewing cobordisms tell us relations among
the operations of (2.0.4). For example,
ω0,1̄,0 ◦ ω0,2̄,1 = ω0,2̄,0 =⇒ ◦ m = η,
which is (1.0.1). Associativity of multiplication comes from uniqueness of the topology of
Σ0,3̄,1 with one boundary circle carrying the induced orientation and three the opposite
orientation. Changing the orientation of each boundary component to its opposite provides
coassociativity. In this way A = Z(S 1 ) acquires a bialgebra structure. To assure duality
between algebra and coalgebra structures, we need to impose another condition here: nondegeneracy of η = ω0,2̄,0 . Then A becomes a commutative Frobenius algebra.
Conversely, if we start with a finite-dimenionsal commutative Frobenius algebra A, then
we first construct ω0,m̄,n on the list of (2.0.4). More general maps ωg,m̄,n are constructed
by partial sewing (2.0.3). By construction, all these maps are associated with cobordism of
circles, and hence determine a 2D TQFT [1].
With the above considerations, we give the following definition.
Definition 2.1 (Two-dimensional Topological Quantum Field Theory). Let (A, , λ) be a
set of data consisting of a finite-dimensional vector space A over K, a non-trivial linear
∼
map : A −→ K, and an isomorphism λ : A −→ A∗ . A Two-dimensional Topological
Quantum Field Theory is a system (A, {ωg,m̄,n }) consisting of linear maps
ωg,k̄,` : A⊗k −→ A⊗` ,
0 ≤ g, k, `,
satisfying the following axioms.
• TQFT 1. Symmetry:
(2.0.5)
ωg,k̄,` : A⊗k −→ A⊗`
is symmetric with respect to the Sk -action on the domain.
• TQFT 2. Non-triviality:
(2.0.6)
ω0,1̄,0 = : A −→ K.
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
13
• TQFT 3. Duality:
A⊗m
(2.0.7)
λ⊗m
(A∗ )⊗m
ωg,m̄,n
(ωg,n̄,m
)∗
/ A⊗n
λ⊗n .
/ (A∗ )⊗n
• TQFT 4. Sewing:
(2.0.8) ωg,m̄,n ◦ ωh,k̄,` = ωg+h+j−1,k+m−j,n+`−j : A⊗k+m−j −→ A⊗n+`−j ,
j ≤ m, j ≤ `.
Remark 2.2. As noted above, the vector space A acquires the structure of a commutative
Frobenius algebra from these axioms. Conversely, if A is a commutative Frobenius algebra,
then ω0,m̄,n of (2.0.4) can be extended to ωg,m̄,n that satisfy the TQFT axioms.
3. Cohomological field theory
Recall that for any oriented closed manifold X, its cohomology ring H ∗ (X, K) is a Frobenius algebra defined over K. If we restrict ourselves to even dimensional manifold X and
consider only even part of the cohomology, then A = H even (X, K) is a finite-dimensional
commutative Frobenius algebra. This Frobenius algebra naturally defines a 2D TQFT. The
role of a TQFT in general dimension is to represent a topological invariant of higher dimensional manifolds. We are now seeing that the classical topology of a manifold X is a
2D TQFT. Changing our point of view, we can ask if we start with X, then how do we
find the corresponding 2D TQFT? Of course the Frobenius algebra structure automatically
determine the unique 2D TQFT as we have seen in Section 2. But then the picture of
sewing cobordisms is lost in this algebraic formulation. What is the role of the cobordism
of circles in the context of understanding the manifold X?
The amazing vision emerged in the early 1990s is that 2D TQFT can be further quantized
into Gromov-Witten theory, which produces quantum topological invariants of X that
cannot be reduced to classical invariants. This epoch making discovery was one of the
decisive moments of the fruitful interaction of string theory and geometry, which is still
continuing today.
String theory deals with flying strings in a space-time manifold X. The trajectory of a
moving string is a curved cylinder embedded in the manifold X, like a duct pipe in the
attic. When strings are considered as quantum objects, they can interact one another.
For example, Figure 2.1 can be interpreted as a string of string interactions. First,
three strings collide in a complicated interaction to produce two strings. The complexity
of the interaction is classified as “g = 2” in terms of the genus of the first surface. These
two strings created in the first interaction then collide in an even more complicated (i.e.,
g = 3) interaction to produce four strings in the end. The trajectory of these interactions
then forms a bordered surface of genus 6 with 7 boundary components embedded in the
space-time X.
Models for string theory were originally introduced to understand how the space-time
X dictates string interactions. In this process, the importance of Calabi-Yau spaces was
recognized, through considerations on the consistency of string theory as a physical theory. By changing the point of view 180◦ , researchers then noticed that a simple model
of string interactions could be used to obtain a totally new class of topological invariants
of X itself. These new invariants are not necessarily captured by the classical topology,
such as (co)homology groups and homotopy groups. We use the terminology of quantum
topological invariants for the invariants obtained by string theory considerations.
14
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Gromov-Witten theory is a mathematically rigorous interpretation of a model for a quantum string theory. A trajectory of interacting strings in X is the image of a map
(3.0.1)
f : Σg,m̄,n −→ X
from a bordered surface Σg,m̄,n into X. Recall that the fundamental group π1 (X, x0 ) of X
is determined by the connectivity of the pointed loop space
L(X, x0 ) = C ∞ (S 1 , ∗), (X, x0 ) ,
which is the moduli space of differentiable maps from S 1 to X that send a reference point
∗ ∈ S 1 to x0 ∈ X. In the same spirit, Gromov-Witten invariants are defined by looking
at the classical topological invariants of appropriate moduli spaces of maps from Σg,m̄,n
to X. When we have the notion of size of a string, the trajectory Σg,m̄,n has a metric on
it. If the ambient manifold X has a geometric structure, such as a symplectic structure,
complex structure, or a Kähler structure, then the map f needs to be compatible with
the structures of the source and the target. For example, if X is Kähler, then we give a
complex structure on Σg,m̄,n that is compatible with the metric it has, and require that f
is a holomorphic map. Technical difficulties arise in defining moduli spaces of such maps.
Even the moduli spaces are defined, they are often very different objects from the usual
differentiable manifolds. We need to extend the notion of manifolds here. Thus identifying
reasonable classical topological invariants of these spaces also poses a difficult problem.
The simplest scenario is the following: We take X = pt to be just a single point. Of
course nobody wants to know the topological structure of a point. We all know it! By
exploring the Gromov-Witten theory of a point, we learn the structure of the theory itself.
Since we can map anything to a point, a point may not be such a simple object, after all.
It is like considering a vacuum in physics. Again, anything can be thrown into a vacuum.
A quantum theory of a vacuum is inevitably a rich theory.
When X = pt is a point, we consider all incoming and outgoing strings to be infinitesimally small. Thus the surfaces we are considering become closed, and boundary components
are just several points identified on them. A metric on a closed surface naturally gives rise
to a unique complex structure, making it a compact Riemann surface. And every compact
Riemann surface acquires a unique projective algebraic structure, making it a projective
algebraic curve. Since we are allowing strings to become infinitesimally small during the
interaction, the trajectory may contain a process of an embedded S 1 in the surface shrinking to a point, and then becoming a finite size circle again a moment later. Such a process
can be understood in complex algebraic geometry as a nodal singularity of an algebraic
curve. Locally, every nodal singularity of a curve is the same as the neighborhood of the
origin of a singular algebraic curve
{(x, y) ∈ C2 | xy = 0}.
We are talking about an abstract notion of trajectories here, because nothing can move in
X = pt. In terms of the map idea (3.0.1), we note that there is a unique map f from any
projective algebraic curve to a point, which satisfies any reasonable requirement of maps
such as being a morphism of algebraic varieties. Then the moduli space of all maps simply
means the moduli space of the source.
A stable curve is a projective algebraic curve with only nodal singularities and a finite
number of smooth points marked on the curve such that it has only a finite number of
algebraic automorphisms fixing each marked point. We recall that the holomorphic automorphism group of P1 ,
Aut(P1 ) = P SL2 (C),
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
15
acts on P1 triply transitively. The number of automorphisms fixing up to 2 points is always
infinity. Since P SL2 (C) is compact and three-dimensional, if we choose three distinct points
on P1 and require the automorphism to fix each of these points, then we have only finitely
many choices. Actually in our case, it is unique. For an elliptic curve E, since it is an
abelian group, E acts on E transitively. To avoid these translations, we need to choose a
point on E. We can naturally identify it as the identity element of the elliptic curve as
a group. Automorphisms of an elliptic curve fixing a point then form a finite group. If a
compact Riemann surface C has genus g = g(C) ≥ 2, then it is known that the order of the
analytic automorphism group is bounded by
|Aut(C)| ≤ 84(g − 1).
This bound comes from hyperbolic geometry. It is easy to see the finiteness. First, we note
that universal covering of C is the upper half plane
H = {z ∈ C | Im(z) > 0},
and C is constructed by the quotient
∼
C −→ H/ρ(π1 (C))
through a faithful representation
(3.0.2)
ρ : π1 (C) −→ P SL2 (R) = Aut(H)
of the fundamental group of C into the automorphism group of H. Every holomorphic
automorphism of C extends to an automorphism of H. We know that C does not have any
non-trivial holomorphic vector field v. If it did, then v would be a differentiable vector field
with isolated zeros, and each zero comes with positive index, because locally it is given by
z n d/dz. We learn from topology that the sum of the indices of isolated zeros of a vector
field on C is equal to χ(C) = 2 − 2g < 0. It is a contradiction. Thus Aut(C) ⊂ P SL2 (C)
is a discrete subgroup. Since P SL2 (R) is compact, |Aut(C)| is finite.
An algebraic curve C is stable if and only if (1) every singularity is nodal, and (2) every
irreducible component C 0 of C has a finite number of automorphisms. The second condition
means that the total number of smooth marked points and singular points of C that are on
C 0 has to be 3 or more if g(C 0 ) = 0, and 1 or more if g(C 0 ) = 1. There is no condition for
an irreducible component of genus two or more.
For a pair (g, n) of integers g ≥ 0 and n ≥ 1 in the stable range 2g − 2 + n > 0, we
denote by Mg,n the moduli space of stable curves of genus g and n smooth marked points.
It is a complex orbifold of dimension 3g − 3 + n. Quantum topological invariants of a point
X = pt is then realized as classical topological invariants of Mg,n . Alas to this day, we
cannot identify the cohomology groups H i (Mg,n , Q) for all values of i, g, n. From the very
definition of these moduli spaces, we can construct many concrete cohomology classes on
each of Mg,n , called tautological classes. What we do not know is indeed how much more
we need to know to determine all of H i (Mg,n , Q). The surprise of Witten’s conjecture
[93], proved in [62], is that we can actually explicitly write intersection relations of certain
tautological classes for all values of g and n.
Among many different proofs available for the Witten conjecture (see for example, [61,
62, 71, 72, 80, 85]), [72, 80] deal with recursive relations among surfaces much in the same
spirit of TQFT. These relations are first noticed in [20]. We will discuss these relations in
connection to topological recursion later in these lectures.
16
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Geometric relations among Mg,n ’s for different values of (g, n) have a simple meaning.
Let us denote by Mg,n the moduli space of smooth n-pointed curves. Then the boundary
Mg,n \ Mg,n
consists of points representing singular curves. Simplest singular stable curve has one nodal
singularity, which can be described as collision of two smooth points. Analyzing how these
singularities occur via degeneration, we come up with three types of natural morphisms
among the moduli spaces Mg,n . They are the forgetful morphisms
(3.0.3)
π : Mg,n+1 −→ Mg,n
which simply erase one of the marked points on a stable curve, and gluing morphisms
(3.0.4)
gl1 : Mg−1,n+2 −→ Mg,n
(3.0.5)
gl2 : Mg1 ,n1 +1 × Mg2 ,n2 +1 −→ Mg1 +g2 ,n1 +n2
that construct boundary strata of Mg,n . Under a gluing morphism, we put two smooth
points of stable curves together to form a one nodal singularity. The first one gl1 glues two
points on the same curve together, and gl2 one each on two curves.
The fiber of π at a stable curve (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) ∈ Mg,n is the curve C itself, because
another marked point can be placed anywhere on C. Thus π is a universal family of curves
parameterized by the base moduli space Mg,n . When we place the extra marked point pn+1
at pi , i = 1, . . . , n, then as the point of Mg,n+1 on the fiber of π, the data represented is a
singular curve obtained by joining C itself with a P1 at the location of pi ∈ C, but the two
marked points pi , pn+1 are actually placed on the line P1 . Assigning this singular curve to
(C, p1 , . . . , pn ) defines a section
σi : Mg,n −→ Mg,n+1 ,
which is a right inverse of π. Geometrically, σi sends (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) to the point pi on the
fiber C = π −1 (C, p1 , . . . , pn ). Obviously,
π ◦ σi : Mg,n −→ Mg,n
is the identity map.
Gromov-Witten theory for a Kähler manifold X [15] concerns topological structure of
the moduli space
Mg,n (X, β) = f : (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) −→ X [f (C)] = β
of stable holomorphic maps f from a nodal curve C with n smooth marked points p1 , . . . , pn ∈
C to X such that the homology class of the image f (C) agrees with a prescribed homology
class β ∈ H2 (X, Z). Here, stability of a map f is again defined by imposing the finiteness
of possible automorphisms. Giving a definition of this moduli space is beyond our scope of
this article. We refer to [15]. The moduli space, if defined, should come with natural maps
ev
i
Mg,n (X, β) −−−−
→ X
φy
Mg,n ,
where the forgetful map φ assigns the stabilization of the source (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) to the map
f by forgetting about the map itself, and
evi f : (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) −→ X = f (pi ) ∈ X,
i = 1, . . . , n,
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
17
is the value of f at the i-th marked point pi ∈ C. Stabilization means that evey irreducible
component of (C, p1 , . . . , pn ) that is not stable is shrunk to a point. If we indeed know the
moduli space Mg,n (X, β) and that its cohomology theory behaves as we expect, then we
would have
ev∗
H ∗ Mg,n (X, β), Q ←−−i−− H ∗ (X, Q)
φ! y
H ∗ (Mg,n , Q),
where φ! is the Gysin map defined by integration along fiber. If Mg,n (X, β) were a manifold,
and the map φ : Mg,n (X, β) −→ Mg,n were a fiber bundle, then Mg,n (X, β) would have
been locally a direct product, hence the Gysin map φ! associated with φ would be defined
by integrating de Rham cohomology classes of Mg,n (X, β) along fiber of φ. Choose any
cohomology classes v1 , . . . vn ∈ H ∗ (X, Q) of X. We then could have defined the GromovWitten invariants by
Z
X,β
GWg,n
(v1 , . . . , vn ) :=
φ! ev1∗ (v1 ) · · · evn∗ (vn ) .
Mg,n
In general, however, construction of the Gysin map does not work as we hope. This is due to
the complicated nature of the moduli space Mg,n (X, β), which often has components of unexpected dimensions. The remedy is to define the virtual fundamental class [Mg,n (X, β)]vir
of the expected dimension, and avoid the use of φ! by defining
Z
X,β
(3.0.6)
GWg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) :=
ev1∗ (v1 ) · · · evn∗ (vn ).
[Mg,n (X,β)]vir
See [15] for more detail.
Now recall that A = H even (X, Q) is a Frobenius algebra. Although Gromov-Witten
theory goes through a big black box [Mg,n (X, β)]vir , what we wish is a map
Ωg,n : H even (X, Q)⊗n −→ H ∗ (Mg,n , Q)
whose integral over Mg,n gives the quantum invariants of X. Then what are the properties
that Gromov-Witten invariants should satisfy? Can we list the properties as axioms for the
above map Ωg,n so that we can characterize Gromov-Witten invariants? This was one of
the motivations of Kontsevich and Manin to introduce CohFT in [63].
As we see below, a 2D TQFT can be obtained as a special case of a CohFT. The amazing
relation between TQFT and CohFT, i.e., the reconstruction of CohFT from its restriction
to TQFT due to Givental and Teleman [48, 91], plays a key role in many new developments
(see for example, [3, 36, 39, 68]), some of which are deeply related with topological recursion.
Definition 3.1 (Cohomological Field Theory [63]). Let A be a finite-dimensional, unital,
associative, and commutative Frobenius algebra with a basis {e1 , . . . , er }. A Cohomological Field Theory is a system (A, {Ωg,n }) consisting of linear maps
(3.0.7)
Ωg,n : A⊗n −→ H ∗ (Mg,n , K)
defined for (g, n) in the stable range 2g − 2 + n > 0 and satisfying the following axioms:
CohFT 0:
Ωg,n is Sn -invariant, and Ω0,3 (v1 , v2 , v3 ) = η(v1 v2 , v3 ).
CohFT 1:
Ωg,n+1 (v1 , . . . , vn , 1) = π ∗ Ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ).
X
gl1∗ Ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) =
Ωg−1,n+2 (v1 , . . . , vn , ea , eb )η ab .
CohFT 2:
a,b
18
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
CohFT 3:
gl2∗ Ωg1 +g2 ,|I|+|J| (vI , vJ ) =
X
η ab Ωg1 ,|I|+1 (vI , ea ) ⊗ Ωg2 ,|J|+1 (vJ , eb ),
a,b
where I t J = {1, . . . , n} is a disjoint partition of the index set, and the tensor product
operation on the right-hand side is performed via the Künneth formula of cohomology rings
H ∗ (Mg1 ,n1 +1 × Mg2 ,n2 +1 , K) ∼
= H ∗ (Mg1 ,n1 +1 , K) ⊗ H ∗ (Mg2 ,n2 +1 , K).
Remark 3.2. The condition Ω0,3 (v1 , v2 , v3 ) = η(v1 v2 , v3 ) says that the product of the
Frobenius algebra is determined by the (0, 3)-value of the Gromov-Witten invariants.
Proposition 3.3 (2D TQFT is a CohFT). Every 2D TQFT is a CohFT that takes values
in H 0 (Mg,n , K). More precisely, let (A, ωg,m̄,n ) be a 2D TQFT. Then ωg,n = ωg,n̄,0 satisfies
the CohFT axioms, by identifying K = H 0 (Mg,n , K).
Proof. Since Mg,n is connected, the three types of morphisms (3.0.3), (3.0.4), and (3.0.5)
all produce isomorphisms of degree 0 cohomologies. Thus the axioms CohFT 1–3 become
(3.0.8)
(3.0.9)
ωg,n+1 (v1 , . . . , vn , 1) = ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ),
X
ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) =
ωg−1,n+2 (v1 , . . . , vn , ea , eb )η ab ,
a,b
(3.0.10)
ωg1 +g2 ,|I|+|J| (vI , vJ ) =
X
η ab ωg1 ,|I|+1 (vI , ea ) · ωg2 ,|J|+1 (vJ , eb ).
a,b
We wish to show that (3.0.8)-(3.0.10) are consequences of the partial sewing axiom (2.0.8)
of TQFT under the identification ωg,n = ωg,n̄,0 .
Since ω0,0̄,1 = 1, we have
ωg,n+1,0 ◦(n+1) ω0,0̄,1 = ωg,n̄,0 = ωg,n : A⊗n −→ K
from (2.0.8), which is (3.0.8). Here, ◦(n+1) is the composition taken at the (n + 1)-th slot
of the input variables of ωg,n+1,0 . Next, we need to identify ω0,0̄,2 : K −→ A ⊗ A. Since
P
ω0,0̄,2 = ω0,1̄,2 ◦ ω0,0̄,1 , we see that ω0,0̄,2 (1) = δ(1) = a,b η ab ea ⊗ eb . Denoting by ◦(n+1,n+2)
to indicate composition taking at the last two slots of variables, we have (3.0.9)
ωg−1,n+2,0 ◦(n+1,n+2) ω0,0̄,2 = ωg,n̄,0 : A⊗n −→ K.
If we have two disjoint sets of variables vI and vJ , then we can apply composition of ω0,0̄,2
simultaneously to two different maps. For example, we have
ωg1 ,|I|+1,0 ⊗ ωg2 ,|J|+1,0 ◦ ω0,0̄,2 = ωg1 +g2 ,|I|+|J|,0 : A⊗(|I|+|J|) −→ K,
which is (3.0.10).
Notice that a linear map
ωg,m+n : A⊗m ⊗ A⊗n −→ K
is equivalent to A⊗m −→ (A∗ )⊗n . Thus we can re-construct a map ωg,m̄,n from ωg,m+n by
(3.0.11)
A⊗m
k
A⊗m
ωg,m+n
/ (A∗ )⊗n
ωg,m̄,n
(λ−1 )⊗n
/ A⊗n
k,
/ A⊗n
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
19
∼
where λ : A −→ A∗ is the isomorphism of (1.0.3). For the case of g = 0, m = 2, and n = 1,
(3.0.11) implies that
λ−1 ω0,3 (v1 , v2 , · ) = ω0,2̄,1 (v1 , v2 ) = v1 v2
for v1 , v2 ∈ A. Or equivalently, we have
(3.0.12)
ω0,3 (v1 , v2 , v3 ) = η(v1 v2 , v3 ) = (v1 v2 v3 ).
This completes the proof.
Conversely, the degree 0 part of the cohomology of a CohFT is a 2D TQFT.
Proposition 3.4 (Restriction of CohFT to the degree 0 part of the cohomology ring). Let
(A, Ωg,n ) be a CohFT associated with a Frobenius algebra A. The Frobenius algebra A itself
defines a unique 2D TQFT (A, ωg,m̄,n ). Denote by
r : H ∗ (Mg,n , K) −→ H 0 (Mg,n , K) = K
the restriction of the cohomology ring to its degree 0 component, and define
(3.0.13)
ωg,n = r ◦ Ωg,n : A⊗n −→ K.
Then we have the equality of maps
(3.0.14)
ωg,n = ωg,n̄,0 : A⊗n −→ K
for all (g, n) with 2g − 2 + n > 0. In other words, the degree 0 restriction of a CohFT is the
2D TQFT determined by the Frobenius algebra A.
Proof. We already know that (A, ωg,m̄,n ) defines a CohFT with values in H 0 (Mg,n , K). We
need to show that this CohFT is exactly the degree 0 restriction of the given CohFT we
start with.
First we extend ωg,n to the unstable range by
(3.0.15)
ω0,1 = : A −→ K,
ω0,2 = η : A⊗2 −→ K.
We then note that from (2.0.4) and (3.0.15), we see that (3.0.14) holds for ω0,1 and ω0,2 . The
general case of (3.0.14) follows by induction on 3g−3+n, provided that ω0,3 is appropriately
defined. This is because (3.0.9) and (3.0.10) are induction formula recursively generating
ωg,n from those with smaller values of g and n. Since
• Case of (3.0.9): 3g − 3 + n = [3(g − 1) − 3 + (n + 2)] + 1,
• Case of (3.0.10): 3(g1 + g2 ) − 3 + |I| + |J| = [3g1 − 3 + |I| + 1] + [3g2 − 3 + |J| + 1] + 1,
we see that the complexity 3g −3+n is always reduced by 1 in each of the recursive formulas.
Finally, we see that since M0,3 is just a point as we have noted above in the discussion
of Aut(P1 ), we have ω0,3 = Ω0,3 . Hence
(3.0.16)
ω0,3 (v1 , v2 , v3 ) = η(v1 v2 , v3 ),
which makes (3.0.14) holds for all values of (g, n). This completes the proof.
Remark 3.5. The above two propositions show that a 2D TQFT can be defined either
just by a commutative Frobenius algebra A, by a system of maps {ωg,m̄,n } satisfying the
TQFT axioms, or the degree 0 part of a CohFT. From now on, we use (A, ωg,n ) to denote
a 2D TQFT, which is less cumbersome and easier to deal with.
Proposition 3.6. The genus 0 values of a 2D TQFT is given by
(3.0.17)
ω0,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) = (v1 · · · vn ).
Proof. This is a direct consequence of CohFT 3 and (1.0.9).
20
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
One of the original motivations of TQFT [4, 89] is to identify the topological invariant
Z(N ) of a closed manifold N . In our current setting, it is defined as
(3.0.18)
Z(Σg ) := λ−1 (ωg,1 )
for a closed oriented surface Σg of genus g. Here, ωg,1 : A −→ K is an element of A∗ , and
∼
λ : A −→ A∗ is the canonical isomorphism (1.0.3).
Proposition 3.7. The topological invariant Z(Σg ) of (3.0.18) is given by
Z(Σg ) = (eg ),
(3.0.19)
where e ∈ A is the Euler element of (1.0.12).
Lemma 3.8. We have
e := m ◦ δ(1) = λ−1 (ω1,1 ).
(3.0.20)
Proof. This follows from
ω1,1 (v) =
X
ω0,3 (v, ea , eb )η ab =
a,b
X
η(v, ea eb )η ab = η(v, e)
a,b
for every v ∈ A.
Proof of Proposition 3.7. Since the starting case g = 1 follows from the above Lemma, we
prove the formula by induction, which goes as follows:
X
ωg,1 (v) =
ωg−1,3 (v, ea , eb )η ab
a,b
=
X
ω0,4 (v, ea , eb , ei )ωg−1,1 (ej )η ab η ij
i,j,a,b
=
X
=
X
η(vea eb , ei )ωg−1,1 (ej )η ab η ij
i,j,a,b
η(ve, ei )ωg−1,1 (ej )η ij
i,j
= ωg−1,1 (ve)
= ω1,1 (veg−1 )
= η(veg−1 , e) = η(v, eg ).
A closed genus g surface is obtained by sewing g genus 1 pieces with one output boundaries
to a genus 0 surface with g input boundaries. Since the Euler element is the output of the
genus 1 surface with one boundary, we obtain the same result
g
z }| {
Z(Σg ) = ω0,g (e, . . . , e).
Finally we have the following:
Theorem 3.9. The value of a 2D TQFT is given by
(3.0.21)
ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) = (v1 · · · vn eg ).
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
21
Proof. The argument is the same as the proof of Proposition 3.7:
ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) = ω1,n (v1 eg−1 , v2 , . . . , vn )
X
=
ω0,n+2 (v1 eg−1 , v2 , . . . , vn , ea , eb )η ab
a,b
= (v1 · · · vn eg ).
4. Category of cell graphs
In the original formulation of 2D TQFT, the operations of multiplication and comultiplication are associated with an oriented surface of genus 0 with three boundary circles. In
this section, we introduce a category of ribbon graphs, which carries the information of all
finite-dimensional Frobenius algebras. To avoid unnecessary confusion, we use the terminology of cell graphs in this article, instead of more common ribbon graphs. Ribbon graphs
naturally appear for encoding complex structures of a topological surface (see for example,
[62, 75]). Our purpose of using ribbon graphs are for degeneration of stable curves, and we
label vertices, instead of faces, of a ribbon graph.
Definition 4.1 (Cell graphs). A connected cell graph of topological type (g, n) is the
1-skeleton of a cell-decomposition of a connected closed oriented surface of genus g with n
labeled 0-cells. We call a 0-cell a vertex, a 1-cell an edge, and a 2-cell a face, of the cell
graph. We denote by Γg,n the set of connected cell graphs of type (g, n). Each edge consists
of two half-edges connected at the midpoint of the edge.
Remark 4.2.
• The dual of a cell graph is a ribbon graph, or Grothendieck’s dessin
d’enfant. We note that we label vertices of a cell graph, which corresponds to face
labeling of a ribbon graph. Ribbon graphs are also called by different names, such
as embedded graphs and maps.
• We identify two cell graphs if there is a homeomorphism of the surfaces that brings
one cell-decomposition to the other, keeping the labeling of 0-cells. The only possible
automorphisms of a cell graph come from cyclic rotations of half-edges at each vertex.
Definition 4.3 (Directed cell graph). A directed cell graph is a cell graph for which an
arrow is assigned to each edge. An arrow is the same as an ordering of the two half-edges
forming an edge. The set of directed cell graphs of type (g, n) is denoted by ~Γg,n .
Remark 4.4. A directed cell graph is a quiver. Since our graph is drawn on an oriented
surface, a directed cell graph carries more information than its underlying quiver structure.
The tail vertex of an arrowed edge is called the source, and the head of the arrow the target,
in the quiver language.
To label n vertices, we normally use the n-set
[n] := {1, 2, . . . , n}.
However, it is often easier to use any totally ordered set of n elements for labeling. The main
reason we label the vertices of a cell graph is we wish to assign an element of a K-vector
space A to each vertex. In this article, we consider the case that a cell graph γ ∈ Γg,n
defines a linear map
(4.0.1)
Γg,n 3 γ : A⊗n −→ K.
22
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
The set of values of these functions γ can be more general. We discuss some of the general
cases in [33].
An effective tool in graph enumeration is edge-contraction operations. Often edge contraction leads to an inductive formula for counting problems of graphs. The same edgecontraction operations acquire algebraic meaning in our consideration.
Definition 4.5 (Edge-contraction operations). There are two types of edge-contraction
operations applied to cell graphs.
~ = p−→
• ECO 1: Suppose there is a directed edge E
i pi in a cell graph γ ∈ Γg,n ,
~ in γ, and put
connecting the tail vertex pi and the head vertex pj . We contract E
the two vertices pi and pj together. We use i for the label of this new vertex, and
call it again pi . Then we have a new cell graph γ 0 ∈ Γg,n−1 with one less vertices. In
this process, the topology of the surface on which γ is drawn does not change. Thus
genus g of the graph stays the same.
E
p
i
p
j
p
i
Figure 4.1. Edge-contraction operation ECO 1. The edge bounded by two vertices
pi and pj is contracted to a single vertex pi .
~ for the edge-contraction operation
• We use the notation E
~ : Γg,n 3 γ 7−→ γ 0 ∈ Γg,n−1 .
(4.0.2)
E
~ in γ ∈ Γg,n at the i-th vertex pi . Since
• ECO 2: Suppose there is a directed loop L
a loop in the 1-skeleton of a cell decomposition is a topological cycle on the surface,
its contraction inevitably changes the topology of the surface. First we look at the
half-edges incident to vertex pi . Locally around pi on the surface, the directed loop
~ separates the neighborhood of pi into two pieces. Accordingly, we put the incident
L
half-edges into two groups. We then break the vertex pi into two vertices, pi1 and
pi2 , so that one group of half-edges are incident to pi1 , and the other group to pi2 .
~ upward near at vertex
The order of two vertices is determined by placing the loop L
pi . Then we name the new vertex on its left by pi1 , and on its right by pi2 .
~ and
Let γ 0 denote the possibly disconnected graph obtained by contracting L
separating the vertex to two distinct vertices labeled by i1 and i2 .
~ is a loop of handle. We use the
• If γ 0 is connected, then it is in Γg−1,n+1 . The loop L
~ to indicate the edge-contraction operation
same notation L
~ : Γg,n 3 γ 7−→ γ 0 ∈ Γg−1,n+1 .
(4.0.3)
L
• If γ 0 is disconnected, then write γ 0 = (γ1 , γ2 ) ∈ Γg1 ,|I|+1 × Γg2 ,|J|+1 , where
(
g = g1 + g2
.
(4.0.4)
I t J = {1, . . . , bi, . . . , n}
The edge-contraction operation is again denoted by
~ : Γg,n 3 γ 7−→ (γ1 , γ2 ) ∈ Γg ,|I|+1 × Γg ,|J|+1 .
(4.0.5)
L
1
2
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
23
p
i
L
p
i1
p
i2
~
Figure 4.2. Edge-contraction operation ECO 2. The contracted edge is a loop L
~
of a cell graph. Place the loop so that it is upward near at pi to which L is attached.
The vertex pi is then broken into two vertices, pi1 on the left, and pi2 on the right.
Half-edges incident to pi are separated into two groups, belonging to two sides of
the loop near pi .
~ a separating loop. Here, vertices labeled by I belong to
In this case we call L
the connected component of genus g1 , and those labeled by J are on the other
component of genus g2 . Let (I− , i, I+ ) (reps. (J− , i, J+ )) be the reordering of I t {i}
(resp. J t {i}) in the increasing order. Although we give labeling i1 , i2 to the two
vertices created by breaking pi , since they belong to distinct graphs, we can simply
~ translates
use i for the label of pi1 ∈ γ1 and the same i for pi2 ∈ γ2 . The arrow of L
into the information of ordering among the two vertices pi1 and pi2 .
Remark 4.6. Let us define m(γ) = 2g − 2 + n for a graph γ ∈ Γg,n . Then every edgecontraction operation reduces m(γ) exactly by 1. Indeed, for ECO 1, we have
m(γ 0 ) = 2g − 2 + (n − 1) = m(γ) − 1.
The ECO 2 applied to a loop of handle produces
m(γ 0 ) = 2(g − 1) − 2 + (n + 1) = m(γ) − 1.
For a separating loop, we have
+)
2g1 − 2 + |I| + 1
2g2 − 2 + |J| + 1
2g1 + 2g2 − 4 + |I| + |J| + 2 = 2g − 2 + n − 1.
The motivation for our introduction of directed cell graphs is that we need them when
we deal with non-commutative Frobenius algebras. The operation of taking disjoint union
is symmetric. Therefore, 2D TQFT inevitably leads to a commutative Frobenius algebra.
The advantage of our formalism using directed cell graphs is that we can deal with noncommutative Frobenius algebras and non-symmetric tensor products.
For the purpose of presenting the idea of the category of cell graphs as simple as possible,
we restrict ourselves to undirected cell graphs in this article. Therefore, we will only recover
commutative Frobenius algebras and usual 2D TQFT. A more general theory will be given
in [33].
We now introduce the category of cell graphs. The most unusual point we present here is
that a morphism between cell graphs is not a cell map. Recall that a cell map f : γ −→ γ 0
from a cell graph γ to another cell graph γ 0 is a topological map between 1-dimensional cell
complexes. Thus f sends a vertex of γ to a vertex of γ 0 , and an edge of γ to either an edge
or a vertex of γ 0 , keeping the incidence relations. In particular, a cell map is continuous
with respect to the topological structure on cell graphs indued from the surface on which
they are drawn.
24
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Definition 4.7 (Category of cell graphs). The category CG of cell graphs is defined as
follows.
• The set of objects of CG is the set of all cell graphs:
a
Γg,n .
(4.0.6)
Ob(CG) =
g≥0,n>0
• A morphism
f ∈ Hom(γ, γ 0 )
is a composition of a finite sequence of edge-contraction operations and cell graph
automorphisms. In particular, Hom(γ, γ) = Aut(γ). If there is no way to bring γ to
γ 0 by consecutive applications of edge-contraction operations and automorphisms,
then we define Hom(γ, γ 0 ) = ∅, even though there may be cell maps between them.
Remark 4.8. The triple (CG, t, ∅) forms a symmetric monoidal category.
Remark 4.9. Automorphisms of a cell graph and ECOs of the first kind are cell maps, but
ECO 2 operations are not. When an ECO 2 is involved, a morphism between cell graphs
does not have to be a cell map. Even it may not be a continuous map.
Example 4.10. A few simple examples of morphisms are given below. Note that vertices
are all labeled, and automorphisms are required to keep labeling.
(4.0.8)
Hom (•, •) = {id}.
Hom •, • • = ∅.
(4.0.9)
E1 E2
Hom(• • •, • •) = {E1 , E2 }.
(4.0.7)
(4.0.10)
(4.0.11)
E1 E2
Hom(• • •, •) = {E1 E2 = E2 E1 }.
E1
Hom • •, •
= {E1 , E2 = σ(E1 )}.
E2
(4.0.12)
Hom • •, • • = {E1 E2 = E2 E1 }.
E1
E2
In (4.0.10), we note that E1 E2 := E1 ◦ E2 is equal to E2 E1 := E2 ◦ E1 , because they both
produce the same result • • • → • • → •. The cell graph of the left of (4.0.11) and
(4.0.12) has an automorphism σ that interchanges E1 and E2 . Thus as an edge-contraction
operation, E2 = E1 ◦ σ = σ(E1 ). Note that there is a 2 : 1 covering cell map for the
E1
case of (4.0.11) that sends both edges E1 and E2 on • • to the single loop of • , and
E2
the two vertices on the first graph to the single vertex on the second. Since it is not an
edge-contraction, this cell map is not a morphism. The morphism of (4.0.12) is not a cell
map, since it is not continuous.
Let Vect be the category of finite-dimensional K-vector spaces. The triple
C = (Vect, ⊗, K)
forms a monoidal category. Again for simplicity, we are concerned only with symmetric
tensor products in this article, so we consider C a symmetric monoidal category. A Kobject in Vect is a pair (V, : V −→ K) consisting of a vector space V and a linear map
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
25
: V −→ K. We denote by Vect/K the category of K-objects in Vect. It has the unique
final object (K, id : K −→ K). Therefore,
C/K = Vect/K, ⊗, (K, id : K −→ K)
is again a monoidal category. We denote by
Fun(C/K, C/K)
(4.0.13)
the endofunctor category of the monoidal category C/K, which consists of monoidal
functors α : C/K −→ C/K as its objects, and their natural transformations τ as morphisms.
Schematically, we have
V
α(h)
W
β(h)
>K
g
β(f )
α(f )
f
h
/ β(V )
τ
α(V )
<K
α(g)
τ
α(W )
/ K.
<
τ
/ β(W )
β(g)
Here, the triangle on the left shows two objects (V, f : V −→ K) and (W, g : W −→ K)
of C/K, and a morphism h between them. The prism shape on the right represents two
monoidal endofunctors α and β that assigns
V 7−→ α(V ),
V 7−→ β(V )
W 7−→ α(W ),
W 7−→ β(W ),
and a natural transformation τ : α −→ β among them. The final object of Fun(C/K, C/K)
is the functor
(4.0.14)
φ : (V, f : V −→ K) −→ (K, idK : K −→ K)
which assigns the final object of the codomain C/K to everything in the domain C/K.
With respect to the tensor product and the above functor (4.0.14) as its identity object,
the endofunctor category Fun(C/K, C/K) is again a monoidal category.
Definition 4.11 (ECO functor, [33]). The ECO functor is a monoidal functor
(4.0.15)
ω : CG −→ Fun(C/K, C/K)
satisfying the following conditions.
• The graph • ∈ Γ0,1 consisting of only one vertex and no edge corresponds to the
identity functor
(4.0.16)
ω(•) = id : C/K −→ C/K.
• Each graph γ ∈ Γg,n corresponds to a functor
(4.0.17)
ω(γ) : (V, : V −→ K) 7−→ (V ⊗n , ωV (γ) : V ⊗n −→ K).
• Edge-contraction operations correspond to natural transformations.
Let us recall the notion of Frobenius object.
26
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Definition 4.12 (Frobenius object). Let (C, ⊗, K) be a symmetric monoidal category. A
Frobenius object is an object V ∈ Ob(C) together with morphisms
m : V ⊗ V −→ V,
1 : K −→ V,
δ : V −→ V ⊗ V,
: V −→ K,
satisfying the following conditions:
• (V, m, 1) is a monoid object in C.
• (V, δ, ) is a comonoid object in C.
We also require the compatibility condition (1.0.7) among morphisms m and δ:
id⊗δ
V ⊗V
V ⊗
8 V ⊗V
/V
m
δ⊗id
&
m⊗id
δ
'
/ V ⊗ V.
8
id⊗m
V ⊗V ⊗V
Since we are considering the monoidal category of K-objects in Vect, there is a priori
no notion of 1 in V . The existence of the morphism 1 : K −→ V requires a non-degeneracy
condition. The following theorem is proved in [33].
Theorem 4.13 (Generation of Frobenius objects [33]). An object (V, : V −→ K) of C/K
is a Frobenius object if ωV (• •) : V ⊗V −→ K defines a non-degenerate symmetric bilinear
form on V .
5. 2D TQFT from cell graphs
The result of Section 3 tells us that a 2D TQFT can be defined as a system (A, ωg,n ) of
linear maps
(5.0.1)
ωg,n : A⊗n −→ K
defined for all values of g ≥ 0 and n ≥ 1, satisfying a set of conditions. The required
conditions are the following: First, (A, ωg,n ) is a CohFT for 2g − 2 + n > 0. In addition, we
require that
ω0,1 = : A −→ K,
(5.0.2)
ω0,2 = η : A ⊗ A −→ K.
In this section we give a different formulation of a 2D TQFT, based on cell graphs and a
different set of axioms. Our ultimate goal is to relate 2D TQFT, CohFT, mirror symmetry,
topological recursion, and quantum curves. Later in these lectures, we introduce quantum
curves. Relations between all these subjects will be discussed elsewhere [33].
Theorem 5.1 (Graph independence [29]). Let (A, : A −→ K) be a Frobenius object under
the ECO functor ω of Definition 4.11. Then every connected cell graph γ ∈ Γg,n gives rise
to the same map
(5.0.3)
ωA (γ) : A⊗n 3 v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ vn 7−→ (v1 · · · vn eg ) ∈ K,
where e is the Euler element of (1.0.12).
Corollary 5.2 (ECO implies TQFT). Define ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) = ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) for every
γ ∈ Γg,n . Then {ωg,n } is a 2D TQFT.
Proof. Since the value of (5.0.3) is the same as (3.0.21), it is a 2D TQFT.
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
27
The rest of the section is devoted to proving Theorem 5.1. We first give three examples
of graph independence.
Lemma 5.3 (Edge-removal lemma). Let γ ∈ Γg,n .
• Case 1. There is a disc-bounding loop L in γ. Let γ 0 ∈ Γg,n be the graph obtained
by simply removing L from γ. Note that we are not contracting L.
• Case 2. The graph γ containts two edges E1 and E2 between two distinct vertices
pi and pj that bound a disc. Let γ 0 ∈ Γg,n be the graph obtained by removing E2 .
Here again, we are just eliminating E2 .
• Case 3. Two loops, L1 and L2 , in γ are attached to the i-th vertex pi . If they are
homotopic, then let γ 0 ∈ Γg,n be the graph obtained by removing L2 from γ.
In each of the above cases, we have
ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) = ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vn ).
(5.0.4)
Figure 5.1. Removal of disc-bounding edges.
Proof. Case 1. Contracting a disc-bounding loop attached to pi creates (γ0 , γ 0 ) ∈ Γ0,1 ×Γg,n ,
where γ0 consists of only one vertex and no edges. The natural transformation corresponding
to ECO 1 then gives
X
ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) =
η(vi , ek e` )η ka η `b ωA (γ0 )(ea )ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , eb , vi+1 . . . , vn )
a,b,k,`
=
X
η(vi , ek e` )η ka η `b η(1, ea )ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , eb , vi+1 . . . , vn )
a,b,k,`
=
X
=
X
η(vi , 1 · e` )η `b ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , eb , vi+1 . . . , vn )
b,k,`
η(vi , e` )η `b ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , eb , vi+1 . . . , vn )
b,`
= ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , vi , vi+1 . . . , vn ).
Case 2. Contracting Edge E1 makes E2 a disc-bounding loop at pi . We can remove it
by Case 1. Note that the new vertex is assigned with vi vj . Restoring E1 makes the graph
exactly the one obtained by removing E2 from γ. Thus (5.0.4) holds.
Case 3. Contracting Loop L1 makes L2 a disc-bounding loop. Hence we can remove it by
Case 1. Then restoring L1 creates a graph obtained from γ by removing L2 . Thus (5.0.4)
holds.
Remark 5.4. The three cases treated above correspond to removing degree 1 and 2 vertices
from the dual ribbon graph.
28
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Definition 5.5 (Reduced graph). A cell graph is reduced if it does not contain any discbounding loops or disc-bounding bigons. In terms of dual ribbon graphs, the dual of a
reduced cell graph has no vertices of degree 1 or 2.
We can see from Lemma 5.3, Case 1, that every graph γ ∈ Γ0,1 gives the same map
(5.0.5)
ωA (γ)(v) = (v).
Similarly, Cases 2 and 3 of Lemma 5.3 show that every graph γ ∈ Γ0,2 defines
ωA (γ)(v1 , v2 ) = η(v1 , v2 ).
This is because we can remove all edges and loops but one that connects the two vertices.
Then by the natural transformation corresponding to ECO 1, the value of the assignment
ωA (γ) is (v1 v2 ) = η(v1 , v2 ).
Proof of Theorem 5.1. We use the induction on m = 2g − 2 + n. The base case is m = −1,
or (g, n) = (0, 1), for which the theorem holds by (5.0.5). Assume that (5.0.3) holds for
all (g, n) with 2g − 2 + n < m. Now let γ ∈ Γg,n be a cell graph of type (g, n) such that
2n − 2 + n = m. Choose an arbitrary straight edge of γ that connects two distinct vertices,
say pi and pj . Then the natural transformation of contracting this edge to γ 0 gives
ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) = ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , vi vj , vi+1 . . . , vbj , . . . , vn ) = (v1 . . . vn eg ).
If we have chosen an arbitrary loop attached to pi , then its contraction by ECO 2 gives
two cases, depending on whether the loop is a loop of handle or a separating loop. For the
former case, we have a graph γ 0 , and by appealing to (1.0.9) and (1.0.13), we obtain
X
ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) =
η(vi , ek e` )η ka η `b ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , ea , eb , vi+1 , . . . , vn )
a,b,k,`
=
X
η(vi ek , e` )η ka η `b ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , ea , eb , vi+1 , . . . , vn )
a,b,k,`
=
X
=
X
η ka ωA (γ 0 )(v1 , . . . , vi−1 , ea , vi ek , vi+1 , . . . , vn )
a,k
η ka (v1 · · · vn eg−1 ea eb )
a,k
= (v1 · · · vn eg ).
For the case of a separating loop, ECO 2 makes γ → (γ1 , γ2 ), and we have
X
ωA (γ)(v1 , . . . , vn ) =
η(vi , ek e` )η ka η `b ωA (γ1 ) vI− , ea , vI+ ωA (γ2 ) vJ− , eb , vJ+
a,b,k,`
!
=
X
ka `b
η(vi , ek e` )η η ea
Y
g1
vc e
!
eb
c∈I
a,b,k,`
Y
g2
vd e
d∈J
!
=
X
η(vi ek , e` )η ka η `b η
Y
vc , ea eg1
!
eb
c∈I
a,b,k,`
d∈J
!
=
X
a,k
η ka η
Y
c∈I
vc eg1 , ea
!
vi ek
Y
Y
d∈J
vd eg2
vd eg2
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
29
!
= vi
Y
c∈I
vc eg1
Y
vd eg2
d∈J
g1 +g2
= (v1 · · · vn e
).
Therefore, no matter how we apply ECO 1 or ECO 2, we always obtain the same result.
This completes the proof.
6. TQFT-valued topological recursion
There is a direct relation between a Frobenius algebra and Gromov-Witten theory when
A is given by the big quantum cohomology of a target space. Since these Frobenius algebras
are usually infinite-dimensional over the ground field, they do not correspond to a 2D TQFT
discussed in the previous sections. But for the case that the target space is 0-dimensional,
the TQFT indeed captures the whole Gromov-Witten theory.
In this section, we present a general framework. Fundamental examples are A = Q, which
gives ψ-class intersection numbers on Mg,n , and the center of the group algebra of a finite
group A = ZC[G], which produces Gromov-Witten invariants of the classifying space BG.
The first example is considered in [29, 30]. The latter case will be discussed elswhere [33].
We wish to solve a graph enumeration problem, where as a graph we consider a cell
graph, and each of its vertex is colored by a parameter v ∈ A. We also impose functoriality
under the edge-contraction of Definition 4.5 for this coloring. The ECOs reduce the complexity of coloring considerably, because the functoriality makes the coloring process graph
independent, as we have shown in the last section. Thus the answer is just the number of
graphs times the value (v1 · · · vn eg ) for each topological type (g, n). Here comes the difficulty: there are infinitely many graphs for each topological type, since we allow multiple
edges and loops. The standard idea for such counting problem is to appeal to the Laplace
transform, which is introduced by Laplace for this particular context of counting an infinite
number of objects. Let us denote by
(6.0.1)
Γg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn )
the set of all cell graphs with labeled vertices of degrees (µ1 , . . . , µn ). Denoting by cd the
number
of d-cells in a cell-decomposition of a surface of genus g, d = 0, 1, 2, we have n = c0 ,
Pn
µ
i=1 i = 2c1 , and 2 − 2g = n − c1 + c2 . Therefore, (6.0.1) is a finite set.
Counting processes become easier if we do not have any object with non-trivial automorphism. There are many ways to eliminate automorphism, for example, the minimalistic
way of imposing the least possible conditions, or an excessive way to kill automorphisms
but for the most objects the conditions are redundant. Actually, it is known that most of
the cell graphs counted in (6.0.1) are without any non-trivial automorphisms. Since any
possible automorphism induces a cyclic permutation of half-edges incident to each vertex,
the easiest way to disallow any automorphism is to assign an outgoing arrow to one of
these half-edges, as in [34, 79] (but not as a quiver). An automorphism should preserve the
arrowed half-edges, in addition to labeled vertices. We denote by
b g,n (µ1 , . . . , µn )
(6.0.2)
Γ
the set of arrowed cell graphs with labeled vertices of degrees (µ1 , . . . , µn ), and by
(6.0.3)
b g,n (µ1 , . . . , µn )
Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ) := Γ
its cardinality. This number is always a non-negative integer, and C0,1 (2m) =
the m-th Catalan number.
2m
1
m+1 m
is
30
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
b g,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ).
We use the notation ωA (γ) = ωg,n : A⊗n −→ K of Corollary 5.2 for γ ∈ Γ
We are interested in considering the Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn )-weighted TQFT
Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ) · ωg,n : A⊗n −→ K,
(6.0.4)
and applying the edge-contraction operations to these maps. We contract the edge of γ that
carries the outgoing arrow at the first vertex p1 , then place a new arrow to the half-edge
next to the original half-edge with respect to the cyclic ordering induced by the orientation
of the surface. If the edge that carries the outgoing arrow at p1 is a loop, then after splitting
p1 , we place another arrow to the next half-edge at each of the two newly created vertices,
again next to the original loop. From this process we obtain the following counting formula:
Proposition 6.1. The 2D TQFT weighted by the number of arrowed cell graphs satisfies
the following equation.
Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ) · ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn )
=
n
X
µj Cg,n−1 (µ1 + µj − 2, µ2 , . . . , µ
cj , . . . , µn ) · ωg,n−1 (v1 vj , v2 , . . . , vbj , . . . , vn )
j=2
(6.0.5)
+
X
Cg−1,n+1 (α, β, µ2 , . . . , µn ) · ωg−1,n+2 δ(v1 ), v2 , . . . , vn
α+β=µ1 −2
+
X
X
α+β=µ1 −2
X
η(v1 , ek e` )η ka η `b
g1 +g2 =g a,b,k,`
ItJ={2,...,n}
× Cg1 ,|I|+1 (α, µI ) · ωg1 ,|I|+1 (ea , vI )
Cg2 ,|J|+1 (β, µJ ) · ωg2 ,|J|+1 (eb , vJ ) .
This is exactly the same formula of [34, 79, 92] multiplied by
ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ) = (v1 . . . vn eg ).
Let us now consider a Frobenius algebra twisted topological recursion. To simplify
the notation, we adopt the following way of writing:
X
(6.0.6)
(f ⊗ h) ◦ δ =
η(•, ek e` )η ka η `b f (ea )h(eb ),
a,b,k,`
where f, h : A −→ K are linear functions on A.
First let us review the original topological recursion of [38] defined on a spectral curve
Σ, which is just a disjoint union of r copies of open discs. Let U be the unit disc centered
at 0 of the complex z-line. We choose r sets of functions (xα , yα ), α = 1, . . . , r, defined on
U with Taylor expansions
(6.0.7)
2
xα (z) = z +
∞
X
k
aα,k z ,
k=3
yα (z) = z +
∞
X
bα,k z k ,
k=2
and a meromorphic 1-form (Cauchy kernel)
dz
dz
−
+ ωα
z−a z−b
on U , where a, b ∈ U , and ωα is a holomorphic 1-form on U . Since each xα : U −→ C is a
2 : 1 map, we have an involution on U that keeps the same xα -value:
(6.0.9)
σα : U −→ U,
xα σα (z) = xα (z).
(6.0.8)
ωαa−b (z) =
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
31
To avoid confusion, we label r copies of U by U1 , . . . , Ur , and consider the functions (xα , yα )
to be defined on Uα . The topological recursion is the following recursive equation
r I
σ (z)−z
ωαα
(z1 )
1 X
(6.0.10) Wg,n (z1 , . . . , zn ) =
2πi
y
σ
(z)
−
y
(z)
dxα (z)
α
α
α
∂U
α
α=1
No (0,1)
×
Wg−1,n+1 z, σα (z), z2 , . . . , zn +
X
g1 +g2 =g
ItJ={2,...,n}
Wg1 ,|I|+1 (z, zI )Wg2 ,|J|+1 σα (z), zJ
on symmetric meromorphic n-differential forms Wg,n defined on the disjoint union U1n t
· · · t Urn for 2g − 2 + n > 0. Here, zI = (zi )i∈I , and “No (0, 1)” in the summation means the
partition g = g1 + g2 and the set partition I t J = {2, . . . , n} do not allow g1 = 0 and I = ∅,
or g2 = 0 and J = ∅. The integration is performed with respect to z ∈ ∂U . Note that the
differential form in the big bracket [ ] in (6.0.10) is a symmetric quadratic differential in
the variable z ∈ Uα . The expression 1/dxα (z) is the contraction operator with respect to
∂z ∂
on Uα . Thus the integrand of the recursion becomes a meromorphic
the vector field ∂x
α ∂z
1-form on Uα in the z-variable, for which the integration is performed. The multiplication
σ (z)−z
by ωαα
(z1 ) is simply the symmetric tensor product with a 1-form proportional to dz1 .
The 1-form W0,1 and the 2-form W0,2 are defined separately:
(6.0.11)
W0,1 (z) :=
r
X
yα (z)dxα (z)
α=1
is defined on the disjoint union U1 t · · · t Ur . If z ∈ Uα , then W0,1 (z) = yα (z)dxα (z). In the
form of (6.0.10), however, W0,1 does not appear anywhere. Similarly, W0,2 is defined by
W0,2 (z1 , z2 ) := dz1 ωαz1 −b (z2 )
(6.0.12)
if z1 , z2 ∈ Uα . Here, the constant b ∈ Uα does not play any role. This 2-form explicitly
appears in the recursion part (the terms in the big bracket [ ]) of the formula.
Definition 6.2. A Frobenius algebra twisted topological recursion for Wg,n =
Wg,n (z1 , . . . , zn ) : A⊗n −→ K is the following formula:
Wg,n (z1 , . . . , zn ; v1 , . . . , vn )
r I
X
1 X
=
Kα z, σα (z), z1 ; ek , e` , v1
2πi
α=1 ∂Uα a,b,k,`
(6.0.13)
×
Wg−1,n+1 z, σα (z), z2 , . . . , zn ; ea , eb , v2 , . . . , vn )
No (0,1)
+
X
g1 +g2 =g
ItJ={2,...,n}
Wg1 ,|I|+1 (z, zI ; ea , vI )Wg2 ,|J|+1 σα (z), zJ ; eb , vJ
.
Here
(6.0.14)
ωασα (z)−z (z1 )η(ek e` , v1 )η ka η `b
Kα z, σα (z), z1 ; ek , e` , v1 =
yα σα (z) − yα (z) dxα (z)
32
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
is the integration-summation kernel. Symbolically we can write (6.0.13) as
r I
1 X
Kα z, σα (z), z1
Wg,n =
2πi
α=1 ∂Uα
(6.0.15)
No (0,1)
X
×
W
◦
δ
+
W
⊗
W
◦ δ
g−1,n+1
g
,|I|+1
g
,|J|+1
1
2
g1 +g2 =g
ItJ={2,...,n}
with the usual integration kernel
σ (z)−z
Kα z, σα (z), z1 :=
yα
ωαα
(z1 )
.
σα (z) − yα (z) dxα (z)
Theorem 6.3. The topological recursion (6.0.13) uniquely determines the (A⊗n )∗ -valued
n-linear differential form Wg,n from the initial data W0,2 . If the initial data is given by
W0,2 (z1 , z2 ; v1 , v2 ) = W0,2 (z1 , z2 ) · η(v1 , v2 )
for a 2-form (6.0.12), then there exists a solution {Wg,n } of the topological recursion (6.0.10)
and a 2D TQFT {ωg,n } such that
(6.0.16)
Wg,n (z1 , . . . , zn ; v1 , . . . , vn ) = Wg,n (z1 , . . . , zn ) · ωg,n (v1 , . . . , vn ).
Proof. The proof is done by induction on m = 2g − 2 + n with the base case m = 0.
We assume that (6.0.16) holds for all (g, n) such that 2g − 2 + n < m, and use the value
ωg,n = (v1 · · · vn eg ) given by (3.0.21) for the values of (g, n) in the range of induction
hypothesis. Then by (6.0.13) and functoriality under ECO 2, we conclude that (6.0.16) also
holds for all (g, n) such that 2g − 2 + n = m.
Remark 6.4. In comparison to edge-contraction operations, we note that the multiplication
case ECO 1 does not seem to have a counterpart in an explicit way. It is actually included
in the terms involving g1 = 0, |I| = 1 and g2 = 0, |J| = 1 in the partition sum, and (1.0.14)
is used to change the comultiplication to multiplication. More precisely, if I = {i}, then it
gives a term
W0,2 (z, zi ; ea , vi )Wg,n−1 σα (z), z2 , . . . , zbi , . . . , zn ; eb , v2 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn
= W0,2 (z, zi )Wg,n−1 σα (z), z2 , . . . , zbi , . . . , zn
· ω0,2 (ea , vi )ωg,n−1 (eb , v2 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn )
in the partition sum, assuming the induction hypothesis. We also note that
X
η(ek e` , v1 )η ka η `b ω0,2 (ea , vi )ωg,n−1 (eb , v2 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn )
a,b,k,`
=
X
=
X
η `b ω0,2 (v1 e` , vi )ωg,n−1 (eb , v2 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn )
b,`
η `b η(v1 vi , e` )ωg,n−1 (eb , v2 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn )
b,`
= ωg,n−1 (v1 vi , v1 , . . . , vbi , . . . , vn ).
By taking the Laplace transform of (6.0.5) using the method of [34, 79], we obtain a
D (z , . . . , z ) · ω
D
solution Wg,n = Wg,n
1
n
g,n to the topological recursion, where Wg,n is given by
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
33
[34, (4.14)] with respect to a global spectral curve of [34, Theorem 4.3], and ωg,n is the
TQFT corresponding to the Frobenius algebra A.
Part 2. Quantization of Higgs Bundles
7. Quantum curves
The cohomology ring H ∗ (X, C) of a Kähler variety X is a Z/2Z-graded Z/2Z-commutative
Frobenius algebra over C. The genus 0 Gromov-Witten invariants of X define the big quantum cohomology of X, which is a quantum deformation of the cohomology ring. If the
mirror symmetry is established for X, then the information of big quantum cohomology of
X is supposed to be encoded in holomorphic geometry of a mirror dual space Y . GromovWitten invariants are generalized to all values of (g, n) with 2g − 2 + n > 0, g ≥ 0, n > 0.
The question is:
Question 7.1. What should be the holomorphic geometry on Y that captures all genera
Gromov-Witten invariants of X through mirror symmetry?
Since the transition from g = 0 to all values of g ≥ 0 is indeed a quantization, the
holomorphic object on Y that should capture higer genera Gromov-Witten invariants of
X is a quantum geometry of Y . A naı̈ve guess may be that it should be a D-module that
represents Y as its classical limit. Hence the D-module is not defined on Y . Then where
does it live?
The idea of quantum curves concerns a rather restricted situation, when the mirror
geometry Y is captured by an algebraic, or an analytic, curve. Typical examples are the
mirror of toric Calabi-Yau orbifolds of three dimensions. Geometry of the mirror Y of a
toric Calabi-Yau 3-fold is encoded in a complex curve known as the mirror curve. Another
situation is enumeration problems of various Hurwitz-type coverings of P1 , and also many
decorated graphs on surfaces. For these examples, although there are no “space” X, the
mirror geometry exists, and is indeed a curve. These mirror curves are special cases of
more general notion of spectral curves. Besides mirror symmetry, spectral curves appear
in theory of integrable systems, random matrix theory, topological recursion, and Hitchin
theory of Higgs bundles. A spectral curve Σ has two common features. The first one is
that it is a Lagrangian subvariety of a holomorphic symplectic surface. The other is the
existence of a projection π : Σ −→ C to another curve C, called a base curve. The quantum
curve is a D-module on the base curve C such that its semi-classical limit is the spectral
curve realized in the cotangent bundle Σ ⊂ T ∗ C.
From the analogy of 2D TQFT and CohFT, we note that a spectral curve is already a
quantized object, since it corresponds to quantum cohomology. The even part H even (X, C),
which is a commutative Frobenius algebra, is not the one that corresponds to a spectral
curve. In this sense, CohFT is a result of two quantizations: the first one from classical
cohomology to a big quantum cohomology through n-point Gromov-Witten invariants of
genus 0; and the second quantization is the passage from genus 0 to all genera.
Remark 7.2. We note that quantum cohomology itself is a Frobenius algebra, though it
is not finite dimensional, because it requires the introduction of Novikov ring. The even
degree part forms a commutative Frobenius algebra, yet it does not correspond to a 2D
TQFT in the way we presented in Part 1.
Now let us turn to the topic of Part 2. The prototype of quantization is a Schrödinger
equation. Consider a harmonic oscillator of mass 1, energy E, and the spring constant
34
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
1/4 in one dimension. It has a geometric description as an elliptical motion of a constant
angular momentum in the phase space, or the cotangent bundle of the real axis. Here, the
spectral curve is an ellipse
1 2
x + y2 = E
4
in a real symplectic plane. The quantization of this spectral curve is the quantization of
the harmonic oscillator, which is a second order stationary Schrödinger equation in one
variable:
1
d2
(7.0.1)
−~2 2 + x2 − E ψ(x, ~) = 0.
dx
4
The quantization we discuss in Part 2 is in complete parallelism to quantization of harmonic oscillator. As a holomorphic symplectic surface, we use (C2 , dx ∧ dy). A plane
quadric
1 2
(7.0.2)
x − y2 = 1
4
is an example of a spectral curve. In complex coordinates, we identify y = d/dx, ignoring
the imaginary unit. An example of quantization of (7.0.2) is a Schrödinger equation
!
1
1 2
d 2
+ 1 − ~ − x ψ(x, ~) = 0,
(7.0.3)
~
dx
2
4
which is essentially the same as quantum harmonic oscillator equation (7.0.1), and is known
as the Hermite-Weber equation. Its solutions are all well studied.
Question 7.3. Why do we care this well-known classical differential equation?
A surprising answer [28, 30, 34, 79] to this question is that we find the intersection numbers
of Mg,n through the asymptotic expansion! First we apply a gauge transformation
!
2
1 2
1 2
d
1
1
e− 4~ x
~
+ 1 − ~ − x2 e 4~ x Z(x, ~)
dx
2
4
(7.0.4)
2
d
d
= ~ 2 + ~x
+ 1 Z(x, ~) = 0,
dx
dx
1
2
where Z(x, ~) = e− 4~ x ψ(x, ~). Recall the integer valued function Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ) of
(6.0.3), and define their generating functions by
X Cg,n (µ1 , . . . , µn ) −µ
n
(7.0.5)
Fg,n (x1 , . . . , xn ) :=
x1 1 · · · x−µ
.
n
µ1 · · · µn
µ1 ,...,µn >0
It is discovered in [34] that the derivatives Wg,n = d1 · · · dn Fg,n satisfy the topological
recursion based on the spectral curve (0.0.1), which is the semi-classical limit of (7.0.4).
With an appropriate adjustment for (g, n) = (0, 1) and (0, 2), we have the following allorder WKB expansion formula [30, 34, 79]:
!
X 1
(7.0.6)
Z(x, ~) = exp
~2g−2+n Fg,n (x, . . . , x) .
n!
g,n
We find ([34]) that if we change the coordinate from x to t by
t+1 t−1
(7.0.7)
x = x(t) =
+
,
t−1 t+1
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
35
then Fg,n x(t1 ), x(t2 ), . . . , x(tn ) is a Laurent polynomial for each (g, n) with 2g − 2 + n > 0.
The coordinate change (7.0.7) is identified in [28] as a normalization of the singular curve
(0.0.1) in the Hirzebruch surface P KP1 ⊕ OP1 by a sequence of blow-ups. The highest
degree part of this Laurent polynomial is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 6g − 6 + 3n
2di +1 !
n
X
Y
(−1)n
ti
highest
(7.0.8) Fg,n
(t1 , . . . , tn ) = 2g−2+n
hτd1 · · · τdn ig,n
|2di − 1|!!
,
2
2
i=1
d1 +···+dn
=3g−3+n
where the coefficients
Z
(7.0.9)
hτd1 · · · τdn ig,n =
Mg,n
ψ1d1 · · · ψndn
are cotangent class intersection numbers on the moduli space Mg,n . Topological recursion
is a mechanism to calculate all Fg,n (x1 , . . . , xn ) from the single equation (7.0.3), or equivalently, (7.0.4). Thus the quantum curve (7.0.3) has the information of all intersection
numbers (7.0.9). These are the topics discussed in our previous lectures [30].
Although the following topic is not what we deal with in this article, for the moment
let us consider a symplectic surface (C∗ × C∗ , d log x ∧ d log y). As a spectral curve, we use
the zero locus of the A-polynomial AK (x, y) of a knot defined in [14]. For a given knot
K ⊂ S 3 , the SL2 (C)-character variety
(7.0.10)
Hom π1 (S 3 \ K), SL2 (C) SL2 (C)
of the fundamental group of the knot complement determines an algebraic curve in (C∗ )2
defined by AK (x, y) ∈ Z[x, y]. Here, (C∗ )2 , or to be more precise, (C∗ )2 /(Z/2Z), is the
SL2 (C)-character variety of the fundamental group of the torus T 2 = S 1 × S 1 , which is the
boundary of the knot complement.
Now consider a function f (q, n) in 2 variables (q, n) ∈ C∗ × Z+ , and define operators
(
(b
xf )(q, n) := q n f (q, n)
(7.0.11)
(b
y f )(q, n) := f (q, n + 1),
following [41, 44]. These operators satisfy the commutation relation
x
b · yb = qb
y·x
b.
The procedure of changing x 7−→ x
b and y 7−→ yb is the Weyl quantization. Garoufalidis
[44] conjectures that there exists a quantization of the A-polynomial such that
(7.0.12)
bK (b
A
x, yb; q)JK (q, n) = 0,
where JK (q, n) is the colored Jones polynomial of the knot K indexed by the dimension n
of the irreducible representation of SL2 (C). Here, the quantization means that the operator
bK (b
A
x, yb; q) recovers the A-poynomial by the restriction
bK (x, y; 1) = AK (x, y).
A
This relations is the semi-classical limit, which provides the initial condition of the WKB
analysis.
A geometric definition of a quantum curve that arises as the quantization of a Hitchin
spectral curve is developed in [31], based on the work of [26] that solves a conjecture of
Gaiotto [42, 43]. The WKB analysis of the quantum curve [27, 28, 30, 57, 58] is performed
by applying the topological recursion of [38]. The Hermite-Weber differential equation is
an example of this geometric theory. Although there have been many speculations [50] of
36
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
the applicability of the topological recursion to low-dimensional topology, still there is no
counterpart of the Hitchin type geometric theory for the case of the quantization of Apolynomials. The appearance of the modularity in this context [22, 60, 95] is a tantalizing
phenomenon, on which there has been a great advancement.
In the following sections, we unfold a different story of quantum curves. In geometry,
there is a process parallel to the passage from a spectral curve (0.0.1) to a quantum curve
(7.0.4). This process is a journey from the moduli space of Hitchin spectral curves to
the moduli space of opers [25, 31]. The quantization parameter, the Planck constant ~ of
(7.0.4), acquires a geometric meaning in this process. We begin the story with finding a
coordinate independent description of global differential equations of order 2 on a compact
Riemann surface.
8. Projective structures, opers, and Higgs bundles
In [27], the authors have given a definition of partial differential equation version of
topological recursion for Hitchin spectral curves. When the spectral curve is a double
sheeted covering of the base curve, we have shown that this PDE topological recursion
produces a quantum curve of the Hitchin spectral curve through WKB analysis. The
mechanism is explained in detail in [28, 30].
WKB analysis is certainly one way to describe quantization. Yet the passage from spectral
curves to their quantization is purely geometric. This point of view is adopted in [31], based
on our work [26] on a conjecture of Gaiotto [42]. Our statement is that the quantization
process is a biholomorphic map from the moduli space of Hitchin spectral curves to the
moduli space of opers [6]. In this section, we introduce the notion of opers, and construct
the biholomorphic map mentioned above. In this passage, we give a geometric interpretation
of the Planck constant ~ as a deformation parameter of vector bundles and connections. For
simplicity of presentation, we restrict our attention to SL2 (C)-opers. We refer to [26, 31]
for more general cases.
To deal with linear differential equation of order higher then or equal to 2 globally on
a compact Riemann surface C, we need a projective coordinate system. If ω is a global
holomorphic or meromorphic 1-form on C, then
(8.0.1)
(d + ω)f = 0
is a first order linear differential equation that makes sense globally on C. This is because
d + ω is a homomorphism from OC to KC , allowing singularities if necessary. Here, KC is
the sheaf of holomorphic 1-forms on C. Of course existence of a non-trivial global solution
of (8.0.1) is a different matter, because it is equivalent to ω = −d log f .
Suppose we have a second order differential equation
2
d
− q(z) f (z) = 0
(8.0.2)
dz 2
2
d
locally on C with a local coordinate z. Clearly dz
2 is not globally defined, in contrast to
the exterior differentiation d in (8.0.1). What is the requirement for (8.0.2) to make sense
coordinate free, then? Let us find an answer by imposing
"
#
"
#
d 2
d 2
2
2
(8.0.3)
dz
− q(z) f (z) = 0 ⇐⇒ dw
− q(w) f (w) = 0.
dz
dw
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
37
We wish the shape of the equation to be analogous to (8.0.1). Since ω is a 1-form, we
impose that q ∈ H 0 (C, KC⊗2 ) is a global quadratic differential on C. Under a coordinate
change w = w(z), q satisfies q(z)dz 2 = q(w)dw2 .
How should we think about a solution f ? For (8.0.2) to have a coordinate free meeting,
we need to identify the line bundle L on C to which f belongs. Let us denote by e−g(w(z))
the transition function of L with respect to the coordinate patch w = w(z). A function
g(w) = g w(z) will be determined later. A solution f satisfies the coordinate condition
(8.0.4)
e−g w(z) f w(z) = f (z).
Then
"
d
dz
2
"
d
dz
2
2
g w(z)
2
g w(z)
0 = dz · e
= dz · e
= dz 2 · eg
w(z)
d −g
e
dz
#
− q(z)
2
− q(z)
2
f (z)
#
2
w(z)
e−g
w(z)
f w(z)
f w(z) − dw2 q(w)f (w)
2
d
− gw (w)w0 f w(z) − dw2 q(w)f (w)
dz
"
#
2
d
d
0
2
= dz 2 ·
− 2gw (w)w0
− gw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0
f w(z) − dw2 q(w)f (w)
dz
dz
h
i
0
2
0
= dz 2 · fw (w)w0 − 2gw (w)w0 fw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0
f (w)
= dz 2 ·
− dw2 q(w)f (w)
dw 2 2
dz + fw (w)w00 dz 2 − 2gw (w)fw (w)dw2
= fww (w)
dz
0
2
− gw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0
f (w)dz 2 − dw2 q(w)f (w)
#
"
2
d
= dw2 ·
− q(w) f (w) + fw (w) w00 − 2gw (w)(w0 )2 dz 2
dw
0
2
− gw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0
f (w)dz 2 ,
where w0 = dw/dz. Therefore, for (8.0.3) to hold, we need
(8.0.5)
(8.0.6)
w00 − 2gw (w)(w0 )2 = 0
0
2
gw (w)w0 − gw (w)w0 = 0.
From (8.0.5) we find
(8.0.7)
gw (w)w0 =
1 w00
.
2 w0
Substitution of (8.0.7) in (8.0.6) yields
00 0
w (z)
1 w00 (z) 2
(8.0.8)
sz (w) :=
−
= 0.
w0 (z)
2 w0 (z)
38
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
We thus encounter the Schwarzian derivative sz (w). Since (8.0.7) is equivalent to
0
1
g(w)0 =
log(w0 ) ,
2
1
0
we obtain g(w) = 2 log w . Here, the constant of integration is 0 because g(z) = 0 when
w = z. Then (8.0.4) becomes
r
dz
− 12 log w0
f (w) ⇐⇒ f (z) =
f (z) = e
f (w),
dw
−1
which identifies the line bundle to which f belongs: f (z) ∈ KC 2 . We conclude that the
coordinate change w = w(z) should satisfy the vanishing of the Schwarzian derivative
sz (w) ≡ 0, and the solution f (z) should be considered as a (multivalued) section of the
−1
inverse half-canonical KC 2 . The vanishing of the Schwarzian derivative dictates us to use
a complex projective coordinate system of C.
A holomorphic connection in a vector bundle E on C is a C-linear map ∇ : E −→ KC ⊗E
satisfying the Leibniz condition ∇(f s) = f ∇(s) + df ⊗ s for f ∈ OC and s ∈ E. Since C is
a complex curve, every connection on C is automatically flat. Therefore, ∇ gives rise to a
holonomy representation
(8.0.9)
ρ : π1 (C) −→ G
of the fundamental group π1 (C) of the curve C into the structure group G of the vector
bundle E. A flat connection ∇ is irreducible if the image of the holonomy representation
(8.0.9) is Zariski dense in the complex algebraic group G. In our case, since G = SL2 (C),
this requirement is equivalent that Im(ρ) contains two non-commuting elements of G. The
moduli space MdeR of irreducible holomorphic connections (E, ∇) in a G-bundle E has
been constructed (see [90]).
Definition 8.1 (SL2 (C)-opers). Consider a point (E, ∇) ∈ MdeR consisting of an irreducible holomorphic SL2 (C)-connection ∇ : E −→ E ⊗ KC acting on a vector bundle E.
It is an SL2 (C)-oper if there is a line subbundle F ⊂ E such that the connection induces
an OC -module isomorphism
(8.0.10)
∼
∇ : F −→ (E/F ) ⊗ KC .
The notion of oper is a generalization of projective structures on a Riemann surface.
Every compact Riemann surface C amsits a projective structure subordinating the given
complex structure (see [51]). For our purpose of quantization of Hitchin spectral curves
associated with holomorphic Higgs bundles, let us assume that g(C) ≥ 2 in what follows.
When we allow singularities, we can relax this condition and deal with genus 0 and 1 cases.
A complex projective coordinate system is a coordinate neighborhood covering
[
C=
Uα
α
with a local coordinate zα of Uα such that for every Uα ∩ Uβ , we have a fractional linear
transformation
aαβ zβ + bαβ
aαβ bαβ
(8.0.11)
zα =
,
fαβ :=
∈ SL2 (C),
cαβ dαβ
cαβ zβ + dαβ
satisfying a cocycle condition [fαβ ][fβγ ] = [fαγ ]. Here, [fαβ ] is the class of fαβ in the
projection
(8.0.12)
0 −→ Z/2Z −→ SL2 (C) −→ P SL2 (C) −→ 0,
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
39
which determines the fractional linear transformation. A choice of ± on each Uα ∩ Uβ is
an element of H 1 (C, Z/2Z) = (Z/2Z)2g , indicating that there are 22g choices of a lift. We
make this choice once and for all, and consider fαβ an SL2 (C)-valued 1-cocycle. Since
1
dzβ ,
(cαβ zβ + dαβ )2
a transition function for KC is given by the cocycle (cαβ zβ + dαβ )2 on each Uα ∩ Uβ . A
dzα =
1
theta characteristic (or a spin structure) KC2 is the line bundle defined by the 1-cocycle
(8.0.13)
ξαβ = cαβ zβ + dαβ .
1
Here again, we have 22g choices ±ξαβ for a transition function of KC2 . Since we have already
made a choice of the sign for fαβ , we have a consistent choice in (8.0.13), as explained below.
1
Thus we see that the choice of the lift (8.0.12) is determined by KC2 . From (8.0.13), we
obtain
∂β2 ξαβ = 0.
(8.0.14)
This property plays an essential role in our construction of global connections on C. First
we show that actually (8.0.14) implies (8.0.11).
Proposition 8.2 (A condition for projective coordinate). A coordinate system of C with
1
which the second derivative of the transition function of KC2 vanishes is a projective coordinate system.
1
Proof. The condition (8.0.14) means that the transition function of KC2 is a linear polynomial cαβ zβ + dαβ satisfying the cocycle condition. Therefore,
dzα
1
=
.
dzβ
(cαβ zβ + dαβ )2
Solving this differential equation, we obtain
(8.0.15)
za =
mαβ (cαβ zβ + dαβ ) − 1/cαβ
cαβ zβ + dαβ
with a constant of integration mαβ . In this way we find an element of SL2 (C) on each
Uα ∩ Uβ . The cocycle condition makes (8.0.15) exactly (8.0.11).
The transition function fαβ defines a rank 2 vector bundle E on C whose structure
group is SL2 (C). Since fαβ is a constant element of SL2 (C), the notion of locally constant
sections of E makes sense independent of the coordinate chart. Thus defining ∇α = d
on Uα for each Uα determines a global connection ∇ in E. Suppose we have a projective
coordinate system on C. Let E be the vector bundle we have just constructed, and P(E) its
projectivization, i.e., the P1 bundle associated with E. Noticing that Aut(P1 ) = P SL2 (C),
the local coordinate system {zα } of (8.0.11) is a global section of P(E). Indeed, this section
defines a map
(8.0.16)
zα : Uα −→ P1 ,
which induces the projective structure of P1 into Uα via pull back. The map (8.0.16) is
not a constant, because its derivative dzα never vanishes on the intersection Uα ∩ Uβ . A
40
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
global section of P(E) corresponds to a line subbundle F of E, such that E is realized as
an extension 0 −→ F −→ E −→ E/F −→ 0. The equality
1
za
aαβ bαβ zβ
=
1
1
cαβ zβ + dαβ cαβ dαβ
−1
z
shows that a defines a global section of the vector bundle KC 2 ⊗ E, and that the
1
projectivization image of this section is the global section {zα } of P(E) corresponding to
F . Here, the choice of the theta characteristic is consistently made so that the ± ambiguity
of (8.0.13) and the one in the lift of the fractional linear transformation to fαβ ∈ SL2 (C)
cancel. Since this section is nowhere vanishing, it generates a trivial subbundle
−1
−1
OC = KC 2 ⊗ F ⊂ KC 2 ⊗ E.
1
−1
Therefore, F = KC2 . Note that det E = OC , hence E/F = KC 2 , and E is an extension
1
−1
0 −→ KC2 −→ E −→ KC 2 −→ 0,
1
−1
determining an element of Ext1 KC 2 , KC2 ∼
= H 1 (C, KC ) ∼
= C.
There is a more straightforward way to obtain (8.0.17).
(8.0.17)
Theorem 8.3 (Projective coordinate systems and opers). Every projective coordinate sys1
tem (8.0.11) determines an oper (E, ∇) of Definition 8.1 with F = KC2 .
Proof. Let σαβ = −(d/dzβ )ξαβ
ξαβ
gαβ : =
(8.0.18)
=
−1
= −cαβ , where ξαβ is defined by (8.0.13). Since
σαβ
cαβ zβ + dαβ
−cαβ
−1 =
ξαβ
(cαβ zβ + dαβ )−1
1 aαβ bαβ zβ −1
,
zα cαβ dαβ
1
which follows from
aαβ − cαβ zα =
aαβ (cαβ zβ + dαβ ) − cαβ (aαβ zβ + bαβ )
1
=
,
(cαβ zβ + dαβ )
(cαβ zβ + dαβ )
we find that fαβ and gαβ define the same SL2 (C)-bundle E. The shape of the matrix gαβ
immediately shows (8.0.17). Since the connection ∇ in E is simply d on each Uα with
respect to fαβ , the differential operator on Uα with respect to the transition function gαβ
is given by
1
zα −1
0 0
(8.0.19)
∇α :=
d
=d−
dzα .
−1 zα
1
1 0
Since the (2, 1)-component of the connection matrix is dzα which is nowhere vanishing,
1
(8.0.20)
1
∇
F = KC2 −→ E ⊗ KC −→ (E/F ) ⊗ KC ∼
= KC2
given by this component is an isomorphism. This proves that (E, ∇) is an SL2 (C)-oper.
In the final step of the proof to show (E, ∇) is an oper, we need that (8.0.20) is an
OC -linear homomorphism. This is because we are considering the difference of connections
∇ and ∇|F in E. More generally, suppose we have two connections ∇1 and ∇2 in the same
vector bundle E. Then the Leibniz condition tells us that
∇1 (f s) − ∇2 (f s) = f ∇1 (s) − f ∇2 (s)
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
41
for f ∈ OC and s ∈ E. Therefore, ∇1 −∇2 : E −→ E⊗KC is an OC -module homomorphism.
Although the extension class of (8.0.17) is parameterized by H 1 (C, KC ) = C, the complex
structure of E depends only if σαβ = 0 or not. This is because
ξαβ σαβ λ−1
ξαβ λ2 σαβ
λ
(8.0.21)
=
,
−1
−1
ξαβ
ξαβ
λ−1
λ
hence we can normalize σαβ = 0 or σαβ = 1. The former case gives the trivial extension of
1
−1
two line bundles E = KC2 ⊕ KC 2 . Since σαβ = cαβ = 0, the projective coordinate system
(8.0.11) is actually an affine coordinate system. Since we are assuming g(C) > 1, there is
no affine structure in C. Therefore, only the latter case can happen. And the latter case
gives a non-trivial extension, as we will show later.
Suppose we have another projective structure in C subordinating the same complex
structure of C. Then we can adjust the ± signs of the lift of (8.0.12) and the square root of
(8.0.13) so that we obtain the exact same holomorphic vector bundle E of (8.0.17). Since
we are dealing with a different coordinate system, the only change we have is reflected in the
connection ∇. Thus two different projective structures give rise to two connections in the
same vector bundle E. Hence this difference is an OC -linear homomorphism E −→ E ⊗ KC
as noted above. This consideration motivates the following.
A Higgs bundle of rank r [52, 53] defined on C is a pair (E, φ) consisting of a holomorphic vector bundle E of rank r on C and an OC -module homomorphism
φ : E −→ E ⊗ KC .
An SL2 (C)-Higgs bundle is a pair (E, φ) of rank 2 with a fixed isomorphism det E = OC
and trφ = 0. It is stable if every line subbundle F ⊂ E that is invariant with respect to φ,
i.e., φ : F −→ F ⊗ KC , has a negative degree degF < 0. The moduli spaces of stable Higgs
bundles are constructed in [90]. We denote by MDol the moduli space of stable holomorphic
SL2 (C)-Higgs bundles on C. It is diffeomorphic to the moduli space MdeR of pairs (E, ∇)
consisting of an irreducible holomorphic connection in an SL2 (C)-bundle (see [23, 52, 90]).
A particular diffeomorphism
(8.0.22)
∼
ν : MDol −→ MdeR
is the non-Abelian Hodge correspondence, which is explained in Section 10.
The total space of the line bundle KC is the cotangent bundle π : T ∗ C −→ C of the
curve C. We denote by η ∈ H 0 (T ∗ C, π ∗ KC ) the tautological section
η
T ∗C
=
π; ∗ KC
/ T ∗C
KC
π
/ C,
which is a holomorphic 1-form on T ∗ C. Since φ is an End(E)-valued holomorphic 1-form
on C, its eigenvalues are 1-forms. The set of eigenvalues is thus a multivalued section of
KC , and hence a multivalued section of π : T ∗ C −→ C. The image Σ ⊂ T ∗ C of this
multivalued section is the Hitchin spectral curve, which defines a ramified covering of
C. The formal definition of Hitchin spectral curve Σ is that it is the divisor of zeros in T ∗ C
of the characteristic polynomial
det(η − π ∗ φ) ∈ π ∗ KC⊗2 .
42
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Hitchin fibration [52] is a holomorphic fibration
(8.0.23)
µH : MDol 3 (E, φ) 7−→ det(η − π ∗ φ) ∈ B,
B := H 0 C, KC⊗2 ,
that defines an algebraically completely integrable Hamiltonian system in MDol . Hitchin
1
notices in [52] that the choice of a spin structure KC2 that we have made allows us to
construct a natural section κ : B ,→ MDol . Define
0 0
0 1
1 0
t
(8.0.24)
X− :=
,
X+ := X− =
,
H := [X+ , X− ] =
.
1 0
0 0
0 −1
These elements generate the Lie algebra hX+ , X− , Hi ∼
= sl2 (C).
Lemma 8.4. Let q ∈ B = H 0 (C, KC⊗2 ) be an arbitrary point of the Hitchin base B, and
define a Higgs bundle (E0 , φ(q)) consisting of a vector bundle
1 ⊗H
1
−1
= KC2 ⊕ KC 2
(8.0.25)
E0 := KC2
and a Higgs field
(8.0.26)
φ(q) := X− + qX+ =
0 q
.
1 0
Then it is a stable SL2 (C)-Higgs bundle. The Hitchin section is defined by
(8.0.27)
κ : B 3 q 7−→ (E0 , φ(q)) ∈ MDol ,
which gives a biholomorphic map between B and κ(B) ⊂ MDol .
Proof. We first note that X− : E0 −→ E0 ⊗ KC is a globally defined End0 (E0 )-valued
1-form, since it is essentially the constant map
1
(8.0.28)
−1
=
1 : KC2 −→ KC 2 ⊗ KC .
Similarly, multiplication by a quadratic differential gives
−1
3
1
q : KC 2 −→KC2 = KC2 ⊗ KC .
Thus φ(q) : E0 −→ E0 ⊗ KC is globally defined as a Higgs field in E0 . The Higgs pair is
stable because no line subbundle of E0 is invariant under φ(q), unless q = 0. And when
1
q = 0, the invariant line subbundle KC2 has degree g − 1, which is positive since g ≥ 2.
Remark 8.5. Hitchin sections exist for the moduli space of stable G-Higgs bundles for an
arbitrary simple complex algebraic group G. The construction utilizes Kostant’s principal
three-dimensional subgroup (TDS) [66]. The use of TDS is crucial in our quantization, as
noted in [26, 31].
The image κ(B) is a holomorphic Lagrangian submanifold of a holomorphic symplectic
space MDol . The holomorphic symplectic structure of MDol is induced from its open dense
subspace T ∗ SU(2, C), where SU(2, C) is the moduli space of rank 2 stable bundles of degree
0 on C. Since the codimension of the complement of T ∗ SU(2, C) in MDol is 2, the natural
holomorphic symplectic form on the cotangent bundle automatically extends to MDol .
Our first step of constructing the quantization of the Hitchin spectral curve Σ is to define
~-connections on C that are holomorphically depending on ~. We use a one-parameter
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
43
family E of deformations of vector bundles
E~
/E
/ C × H 1 (C, KC ),
C × {~}
and a C-linear first-order differential operator ~∇~ : E~ −→ E~ ⊗ KC depending holomorphically on ~ ∈ H 1 (C, KC ) ∼
= C for ~ 6= 0. Here, we identify the Planck constant ~ of the
quantization as a geometric parameter
1
− 12
1
1
2
~ ∈ H (C, KC ) = Ext KC , KC ∼
= C,
which determines a unique extension
1
−1
0 −→ KC2 −→ E~ −→ KC 2 −→ 0.
(8.0.29)
This is exactly the same as (8.0.17). The extension E~ is given by a system of transition
functions
ξαβ ~σαβ
(8.0.30)
E~ ←→
−1
0
ξαβ
on each Uα ∩Uβ . The cocycle condition for the transition functions translates into a condition
−1
σαγ = ξαβ σβγ + σαβ ξβγ
.
(8.0.31)
The application of the exterior differentiation d to the cocycle condition ξαγ = ξαβ ξβγ for
1
KC2 yields
dξβγ
dξαβ
dξαγ
dzβ ξβγ + ξαβ
dzγ =
dzγ .
dzγ
dzβ
dzγ
2 =
Noticing ξαβ
dzβ
dzα ,
we find that
σαβ := −
(8.0.32)
dξαβ
= −∂β ξαβ
dzβ
solves (8.0.31). The negative sign is chosen to relate (8.0.30) and (8.0.11). By the same
reason as before, the complex structure of the vector bundle E~ is isomorphic to E1 if ~ 6= 0,
and to E0 of (8.0.25) if ~ = 0. The transition function can also be written as
(8.0.33)
ξαβ ~σαβ
1 0
0 1
= exp log ξαβ
exp −~∂β log ξαβ
.
−1
ξαβ
0 −1
0 0
Therefore, in the multiplicative sense, the extension class is determined by ∂β log ξαβ .
Lemma 8.6. The extension class σαβ of (8.0.32) defines a non-trivial extension (8.0.29).
44
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Proof. The long exact sequences of cohomologies
H 1 (C, C)
/ H 1 (C, OC )
/ H 2 (C, C)
k
/ H 1 (C, O ∗ ) d log / H 1 (C, KC )
C
H 1 (C, C∗ )
0
/ H 1 (C, KC ) ∼
c1
=
H 2 (C, Z)
/ H 2 (C, Z)
associated with exact sequences of sheaves
0
0
0
/Z
0
/C
/ OC
/ KC
/0
0
/ C∗
/ O ∗ d log / KC
C
/0
0
=
/Z
/0
d
0
0
show that the class {σαβ } corresponds to the image of {ξab } via the map
d log
∗) −
−−−→ H 1 (C, KC ).
H 1 (C, OC
If d log{ξαβ } = 0 ∈ H 1 (C, KC ), then it comes from a class in H 1 (C, C∗ ), which is the
moduli space of line bundles with holomorphic connections, as explained in [8]. It leads to
a contradiction
1
0 = c1 KC2 = g − 1 > 0,
because g(C) ≥ 2.
Remark 8.7. Gukov and Sulkowski [50] defines an intriguing
quantizability condition for a
spectral curve in terms of the algebraic K-group K2 C(Σ) of the function field of spectral
curve Σ. They relate the quantizability and Bloch regulators of [8].
The class {σαβ } of (8.0.32) gives a natural isomorphism H 1 (C, KC ) ∼
= C. We identify
the deformation parameter ~ ∈ C with the cohomology class {~σαβ } ∈ H 1 (C, KC ) = C.
S
We trivialize the line bundle KC⊗2 with respect to a coordinate chart C = α Uα , and write
q ∈ H 0 (C, KC⊗ 2) as {(q)α } that satisfies the transition relation
(8.0.34)
4
(q)α = (q)β ξαβ
.
The transition function of the trivial extension E0 is given by
(8.0.35)
H
ξαβ
= exp(H log ξαβ ).
Since X− : E0 −→ E0 ⊗ KC is a globally defined Higgs filed, its local expressions {X− dzα }
with respect to a coordinate system satisfies the transition relation
(8.0.36)
X− dzα = exp(H log ξαβ )X− dzβ exp(−H log ξαβ )
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
45
on every Uα ∩ Uβ . The same relation holds for the Higgs field φ(q) as well:
(8.0.37)
φα (q)dzα = exp(H log ξαβ )φβ (q)dzβ exp(−H log ξαβ ).
Theorem 8.8 (Construction of SL2 (C)-opers). On each Uα ∩Uβ define a transition function
ξαβ
1 −~∂β log ξαβ
~
(8.0.38) gαβ := exp(H log ξαβ ) exp − ~∂β log ξαβ X+ =
,
−1 ·
ξαβ
1
where ∂β =
d
dzβ ,
and ~∂β log ξαβ ∈ H 1 (C, KC ). Then
~ } satisfies the cocycle condition
• The collection {gαβ
~
~
~
gαβ
gβγ
= gαγ
,
(8.0.39)
which defines the holomorphic vector bundle bundle E~ of (8.0.29).
• The local expression
1
(8.0.40)
∇~α (0) := d − X− dza
~
on Uα for ~ 6= 0 defines a global holomorphic connection in E~ , i.e.,
−1
1
1
~
~
(8.0.41)
d − X− dzα = gαβ d − X− dzβ
gαβ
,
~
~
if and only if the coordinate is a projective coordinate system. We choose one.
• With this particular projective coordinate system, every point (E0 , φ(q)) ∈ κ(B) ⊂
MDol of the Hitchin
section (8.0.27) gives rise to a one-parameter family of SL2 (C)~
opers E~ , ∇ (q) ∈ MdeR . In other words, the local expression
1
∇~α (q) := d − φα (q)dzα
~
on every Uα for ~ 6= 0 determines a global holomorphic connection
−1
~
~
∇~β (q) gαβ
(8.0.43)
∇~α (q) = gαβ
(8.0.42)
in E~ satisfying the oper condition.
• Deligne’s ~-connection
~∇~ (q) : E~ −→ E~ ⊗ KC
(8.0.44)
interpolates the Higgs pair and the oper, i.e., at ~ = 0, the family (8.0.44) gives the
Higgs pair (E, −φ(q)) ∈ MDol , and at ~ = 1 it gives an SL2 (C)-oper E1 , ∇1 (q) ∈
MdeR .
• After a suitable gauge transformation depending on ~, the ~ → ∞ limit of the oper
∇~ (q) exists and is equal to ∇~=1 (0). This point corresponds to the C∗ -fixed point
on the Hitchin section.
Proof. The cocycle condition of gαβ has been established in (8.0.32) and (8.0.33). Proof
of (8.0.41) is a straightforward calculation, using the power series expansion of the adjoint
action
n
(8.0.45)
e
~A
Be
−~A
∞
∞
}|
{
X
X
1 nz
1 n
~ (adA )n (B) :=
~ [A, [A, [· · · , [A, B] · · · ]]].
=
n!
n!
n=0
It follows that
−1
~
~
gαβ
X− gαβ
n=0
46
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
= exp(H log ξαβ ) exp (−~∂β log ξαβ X+ ) X− exp (~∂β log ξαβ X+ ) exp(−H log ξαβ )
= exp(H log ξαβ )X− exp(−H log ξαβ ) − ~∂β log ξαβ H
− ~2 (∂β log ξαβ )2 exp(H log ξαβ )X+ exp(−H log ξαβ ).
Note that (8.0.14) is equivalent to
−1
−2
∂β ∂β log ξαβ = ∂β ξαβ
∂β ξαβ = −ξαβ
(∂β ξαβ )2 = −(∂β log ξαβ )2 ,
hence to
−1
~
~
= ∂β log ξαβ H + ~(∂β log ξαβ )2 exp(H log ξαβ )X+ exp(−H log ξαβ ).
∂β gαβ
gαβ
Therefore, noticing (8.0.36), (8.0.14) is equivalent to
−1
−1
1
1 ~
~
~
~
dzβ = exp(H log ξαβ )X− dzβ exp(−H log ξαβ )
+ ∂β gαβ gαβ
g X− gαβ
~ αβ
~
1
= X− dzα .
~
The statement follows from Proposition 8.2.
To prove (8.0.43), we need, in addition to (8.0.41), the following relation:
−1
~
~
.
(q)β X+ dzβ gαβ
(8.0.46)
(q)α X+ dzα = gαβ
But (8.0.46) is obvious from (8.0.37) and (8.0.38).
1
The line bundle F required in the definition of SL2 (C)-oper is simply KC2 . The isomorphism (8.0.10) is a consequence of (8.0.28). Finally, the gauge transformation of ∇~ (q) by
a bundle automorphism
" 1
#
−2
H
~
(8.0.47)
~− 2 =
1
~2
on each coordinate neighborhood Uα gives
H
H
1
1
q
(8.0.48)
d − φ(q) 7−→ ~− 2 d − φ(q) ~ 2 = d − X− + 2 X+ .
~
~
~
This is because
H
H
~− 2 X− ~ 2 = ~X−
and
H
H
2 2
2
~− 2 X+
~ = ~−2 X+
,
which follows from the adjoint formula (8.0.45). Therefore,
lim ∇~ (q) ∼ d − X− = ∇~=1 (0),
~→∞
where the symbol ∼ means gauge equivalence. This completes the proof of the theorem.
The construction theorem yields the following.
Theorem 8.9 (Biholomorphic quantization of Hitchin spectral curves). Let C be a compact
Riemann surface of genus g ≥ 2 with a chosen projective coordinate system subordinating
its complex structure. We denote by MDol the moduli space of stable holomorphic SL2 (C)Higgs bundles over C, and by MdeR the moduli space of irreducible holomorphic SL2 (C)1
connections on C. For a fixed theta characteristic KC2 , we have a Hitchin section κ(B) ⊂
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
47
MDol of (8.0.27). We denote by Op ⊂ MdeR the moduli space of SL2 (C)-opers with the
1
condition that the required line bundle is given by F = KC2 . Then the map
γ
(8.0.49)
MDol ⊃ κ(B) 3 (E0 , φ(q)) 7−→ E~ , ∇~ (q) ∈ Op ⊂ MdeR
evaluated at ~ = 1 is a biholomorphic map with respect to the natural complex structures
induced from the ambient spaces.
The biholomorphic quantization (8.0.49) is also C∗ -equivariant. The λ ∈ C∗ action on
the Hitchin section is defined by φ 7−→ λφ. The oper corresponding to (E0 , λφ(q)) ∈ κ(B)
is d − λ~ φ(q).
Proof. The C∗ -equivariance follows from the same argument of the gauge transformation
(8.0.47), (8.0.48). The action φ 7−→ λφ on the Hitchin section induces a weighted action
B 3 q 7−→ λ2 q ∈ B
through µH . Then we have the gauge equivalence via the gauge transformation
H
− H
2
λ
λ 2
λ
λ
λ2 q
d − φ(q) ∼
d − φ(q)
= d − X− + 2 X+ .
~
~
~
~
~
λ
~
H2
:
Remark 8.10. In the construction theorem, our use of a projective coordinate system is
essential, through (8.0.13). Only in such a coordinate, our particular definition (8.0.42)
makes sense. This is due to the vanishing of the second derivative of ξαβ . And as we have
seen above, the projective coordinate system determines the origin ∇1 (0) of the space Op
of opers. Other opers are simply translation ∇1 (q) from the origin by q ∈ H 0 (C, KC⊗2 ).
9. Semi-classical limit of SL2 (C)-opers
A holomorphic connection on a compact Riemann surface C is automatically flat. Therefore, it defines a D-module over C. Continuing the last section’s conventions, let us fix
a projective coordinate system on C, and let (E0 , φ(q)) = κ(q) be a point
on the Hitchin
section of (8.0.27). It uniquely defines an ~-family of opers E~ , ∇~ (q) .
In this section, we establish that the ~-connection ~∇~ (q) defines a family of D-modules
on C parametrized by B such that the semi-classical limit of the family agrees with the
family of spectral curves over B.
To calculate the semi-classical limit, let us trivialize the vector bundle E~ on each simply
connected coordinate neighborhood Uα with coordinate zα of the chosen projective coordinate system. A flat section Ψα of E~ over Uα is a solution of
~ψ
~
(9.0.1)
~∇α (q)Ψα := (~d − φα (q))
= 0,
ψ α
~ Ψ , the function ψ on U satisfies
with an appropriate unknown function ψ. Since Ψα = gαβ
α
β
−1
the transition relation (ψ)α = ξαβ (ψ)β . It means that ψ is actually a local section of the
−1
line bundle KC 2 . There are two linearly independent solutions of (9.0.1), because q is a
holomorphic function on Uα . Since φ(q) is independent of ~ and takes the form
0 q
(9.0.2)
φ(q) =
,
1 0
48
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
we see that (9.0.1) is equivalent to the second order equation
~2 ψ 00 − qψ = 0
(9.0.3)
−1
for ψ ∈ KC 2 . Since we are using a fixed projective coordinate system, the connection
∇~ (q) takes the same form on each coordinate neighborhood Uα . Therefore, the shape of
the differential equation of (9.0.3) as an equation for ψ is again the same on every coordinate
neighborhood, as we wished to achieve in (8.0.2). This is exactly what we refer to as the
quantum curve of the spectral curve det(η − φ(q)) = 0. It is now obvious to calculate the
semi-classical limit of the D-module corresponding to ~∇~ (q).
Theorem 9.1 (Semi-classical limit of an oper). Under the same setting of Theorem 8.9, let
E(q) denote the D-module E~ , ~∇~ (q) associated with the oper of (8.0.49). Then the semiclassical limit of E(q) is the spectral curve Σ ⊂ T ∗ C of φ(q) defined by the characteristic
equation det(η − φ(q)) = 0.
The semi-classical limit of (9.0.3) is the limit
"
#
2
1
1
d
(9.0.4)
lim e− ~ S0 (zα ) ~2
− q e ~ S0 (za ) = y 2 − q,
~→0
dzα
where S0 (zα ) is a holomorphic function on Uα so that dS0 = ydzα gives a local trivialization
of T ∗ C over Uα . The computation of semi-classical limit is the same as the calculation of
the determinant of the connection ~∇~ (q), after taking conjugation by the scalar diagonal
1
matrix e− ~ S0 (zα ) I2×2 , and then take the limit as ~ goes to0.
For every ~ ∈ H 1 (C, KC ), the ~-connection E~ , ~∇~ (q) of (8.0.44) defines a global DC module structure in E~ . Thus we have constructed a universal family EC of DC -modules on
a given C with a fixed spin structure and a projective structure:
⊃
E~ , ∇~ (q)
(9.0.5)
EC o
C × B × H 1 (C, KC ) o
C × {q} × {~}
The universal family SC of spectral curves is defined over C × B.
(9.0.6)
P (KC ⊕ OC ) × B o
C ×B o
SC o
C ×B o
=
det η − φ(q)
⊃
0
C × {q}.
The semi-classical limit is thus a map of families
(9.0.7)
EC
/ SC
/ C × B.
C × B × H 1 (C, KC )
10. Non-Abelian Hodge correspondence between Hitchin moduli spaces
The biholomorphic map (8.0.49) is defined by fixing a projective structure of the base
curve C. Gaiotto [42] conjectured that such a correspondence would be canonically constructed through a scaling limit of non-Abelian Hodge correspondence. The conjecture has
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
49
been solved in [26] for holomorphic Hitchin moduli spaces MDol and MdeR constructed
over an arbitrary complex simple and simply connected Lie group G. In this section, we
review the main result of [26] for G = SL2 (C) and compare it with our quantization.
We denote by E top the topologically trivial complex vector bundle of rank 2 on a compact Riemann surface C of genus g ≥ 2. The correspondence between stability conditions
of holomorphic vector bundles on C and PDEs on differential geometric data is used in
Narasimhan-Seshadri [83] to obtain topological structures of the moduli space of stable
bundles (see also [5, 82]). Extending this classical case, the stability condition for an
SL2 (C)-Higgs bundle (E, φ) translates into a system of PDEs, known as Hitchin’s equations, imposed on a set of geometric data [23, 52, 90]. The data we need are a Hermitian
fiber metric h on E top , a unitary connection D in E top with respect to h, and a differentiable sl2 (C)-valued 1-form φ on C. In this section we use D for unitary connections to
avoid confusion with holomorphic connections we have been using until the last section.
Hitchin’s equations are the following system of nonlinear PDEs.
(
FD + [φ, φ† ] = 0
(10.0.1)
D0.1 φ = 0.
Here, FD denotes the curvature 2-form of D, φ† is the Hermitian conjugate of φ with
respect to the metric h, and D0,1 is the Cauchy-Riemann part of D defined by the complex
structure of the base curve C. D0,1 determines a complex structure in E top , which we
simply denote by E. Then φ becomes a holomorphic Higgs field in E because it satisfies
the Cauchy-Riemann equation (10.0.1). The pair (E, φ) constructed in this way from a
solution of Hitchin’s equations is a stable Higgs bundle. Conversely [90], a stable Higgs
bundle (E, φ) gives rise to a unique harmonic Hermitian metric h and the Chern connection
D with respect to h so that the data satisfy Hitchin’s equations. The stability condition for
the holomorphic Higgs pair (E, φ) is thus translated into (10.0.1).
Define a one-parameter family of connections
1
ζ ∈ C∗ .
(10.0.2)
D(ζ) := · φ + D + ζ · φ† ,
ζ
Then the flatness of D(ζ) for all ζ is equivalent to (10.0.1). The non-Abelian Hodge correspondence [23, 52, 73, 90] is a diffeomorphic correspondence
e ∇)
e ∈ MdeR .
ν : MDol 3 (E, φ) 7−→ (E,
Proving the diffeomorphism of these moduli spaces is far beyond of the scope of this article.
Here, we only give the definition of the map ν. We start with the solution (D, φ, h) of
Hitchin’s equations corresponding to a stable Higgs bundle (E, φ). It induces a family of
e in E top by D(ζ = 1)0,1 . Since D(ζ) is
flat connections D(ζ). Define a complex structure E
1,0
e := D(ζ = 1) is automatically a holomorphic connection in E.
e Stability of (E, φ)
flat, ∇
e ∇)
e ∈ MdeR .
implies that the resulting holomorphic connection is irreducible, hence (E,
Since this correspondence goes through the real unitary connection D, the change of the
e is not a holomorphic deformation.
complex structure of E to that of E
Extending the idea of one-parameter family (10.0.2), Gaiotto conjectures:
Conjecture 10.1 (Gaiotto [42]). Let (D, φ, h) be the solution of (10.0.1) corresponding
to a sable Higgs bundle (E0 , φ(q)) on the SL2 (C)-Hitchin section (8.0.27). Consider the
following two-parameter family of connections
1
(10.0.3)
D(ζ, R) := · Rφ + D + ζ · Rφ† ,
ζ ∈ C∗ , R ∈ R+ .
ζ
50
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
Then the scaling limit
(10.0.4)
lim
R→0,ζ→0
ζ/R=~
D(ζ, R)
exists for every ~ ∈ C∗ , and forms an ~-family of SL2 (C)-opers.
Remark 10.2.
(1) The existence of the limit is non-trivial, because the Hermitian metric h blows up as R → 0.
(2) Unlike the case of non-Abelian Hodge correspondence, the Gaiotto limit works only
for a point in the Hitchin section.
Theorem 10.3 ([26]). Gaiotto’s conjecture holds for an arbitrary simple and simply connected complex algebraic group G.
Recall that the representation (3.0.2) gives a realization of C from its universal covering
space H as
C∼
= H ρ π1 (C) .
The representation ρ lifts to SL2 (R) ⊂ SL2 (C), and defines a projective structure in C
subordinating its complex structure coming from H. This projective structure is what we
call the Fuchsian projective structure.
Corollary 10.4 (Gaiotto correspondence and quantization [26]). Under the same setting
of Conjecture 10.1, the limit oper of (10.0.4) is given by
1
(10.0.5)
lim D(ζ, R) = d − φ(q) = ∇~ (q),
~=
6 0,
R→0,ζ→0
~
ζ/R=~
with respect to the Fuchsian projective coordinate system. The correspondence
γ
(E0 , φ(q)) 7−→ E~ , ∇~ (q)
is biholomorphic, unlike the non-Abelian Hodge correspondence.
Proof. The key point is that since E0 is made out of KC , the fiber metric h naturally comes
from the metric of C itself. Hitchin’s equations (10.0.1) for q = 0 then become a harmonic
equation for the metric of C, and its solution is given by the constant curvature hyperbolic
metric. This metric in turn defines the Fuchsian projective structure in C. For more detail,
we reefer to [25, 26].
Remark 10.5. The case of an arbitrary simple algebraic group G of the conjecture, and
the whole story of Part 2 for G, have been worked out in [26, 31]. The key point is to use
Kostant’s TDS of [66] and transcribe the SL2 (C) situation into G.
References
[1] L. Abrams, Two-dimensional topological quantum field theories and Frobenius algebras, Journal of Knot Theory
and Ramifications 5, 335–352 (2000).
[2] M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Mariño, and C. Vafa, Topological Strings and Integrable Hierarchies,
[arXiv:hep-th/0312085], Commun. Math. Phys. 261, 451–516 (2006).
[3] J.E. Andersen, S. Gukov, and D. Pei, The Verlinde formula for Higgs bundles, arXiv:1608.01761 (2016).
[4] M.F. Atiyah, Topological quantum field theory, [arXiv:hep-th/0312085], Publications Mathématiques de
l’I.H.É.S., 68, 175–186 (1988).
[5] M.F. Atiyah and R. Bott, The Yang-Mills equations over Riemann surfaces, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A
308, 523–615 (1982).
[6] A. Beilinson and V. Drinfeld, Opers, arXiv:math/0501398v1 [math.AG] (2005).
[7] A. Beauville, M. S. Narasimhan, and S. Ramanan, Spectral curves and the generalized theta divisor, J. reine
angew. Math. 398, 169–179 (1989).
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
51
[8] S. Bloch, The dilogarithm and extensions of Lie algebras, in “Algebraic K-theory Evanston 1980,” 23 pages
(1981).
[9] V. Bouchard, D. Hernández Serrano, X. Liu, and M. Mulase, Mirror symmetry for orbifold Hurwitz numbers,
arXiv:1301.4871 [math.AG] (2013).
[10] V. Bouchard, A. Klemm, M. Mariño, and S. Pasquetti, Remodeling the B-model, Commun. Math. Phys. 287,
117–178 (2009).
[11] V. Bouchard, A. Klemm, M. Mariño, and S. Pasquetti, Topological open strings on orbifolds, Commun. Math.
Phys. 296, 589–623 (2010).
[12] K. Chapman, M. Mulase, and B. Safnuk, The Kontsevich constants for the volume of the moduli of curves and
topological recursion, Communications in Number Theory and Physics 5, 643–698 (2011).
[13] R. Cohen and P. Norbury, Morse field theory, Asian Journal of Mathematics 16, 661–712 (2012).
[14] D. Cooper, D.M. Culler, H. Gillet, D. Long, and P. Shalen, Plane curves associated to character varieties of
3-manifolds, Invent. Math. 118, 47–84 (1994).
[15] D. Cox and S. Katz, Mirror symmetry and algebraic geometry, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 68, 469
pps, American Mathematical Society (1999).
[16] R. Dijkgraaf, A geometrical approach to two-dimensional Conformal Field Theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Universiteit
Utrecht (1989).
[17] R. Dijkgraaf, H. Fuji, and M. Manabe, The Volume Conjecture, Perturbative Knot Invariants, and Recursion
Relations for Topological Strings, Nucl. Phys. B849,166–211 (2011).
[18] R. Dijkgraaf, L. Hollands, and P. Sulkowski, Quantum curves and D-modules, Journal of High Energy Physics
0810.4157, 1–58 (2009).
[19] R. Dijkgraaf, L. Hollands P. Sulkowski, and C. Vafa, Supersymmetric gauge theories, intersecting branes and
free Fermions, Journal of High Energy Physics 0802.106, (2008).
[20] R. Dijkgraaf, E. Verlinde, and H. Verlinde, Loop equations and Virasoro constraints in non-perturbative twodimensional quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B348, 435–456 (1991).
[21] T. Dimofte, D. Gaiotto, and S. Gukov. 3-manifolds and 3d indices, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 17, 975–1076
(2013).
[22] T. Dimofte and S. Garoufalidis, Quantum modularity and complex Chern-Simons theory arXiv:1511.05628
[math.GT] (2015).
[23] S.K. Donaldson, A new proof of a theorem of Narasimhan and Seshadri, Journal of Differential Geometry, 18
(2): 269277, (1983).
[24] B. Dubrovin and Y. Zhang, Normal forms of hierarchies of integrable PDEs, Frobenius manifolds and GromovWitten invariants, arxiv:math/0108160 [math.DG] (2001).
[25] O. Dumitrescu, A journey from the Hitchin section to opers, arXiv:1701.00155 (2017).
[26] O. Dumitrescu, L. Fredrickson, G. Kydonakis, R. Mazzeo, M. Mulase, and A. Neitzke, Opers versus nonabelian
Hodge, arXiv:1608.03994 (2016).
[27] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Quantum curves for Hitchin fibrations and the Eynard-Orantin theory, Lett.
Math. Phys. 104, 635–671 (2014).
[28] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Quantization of spectral curves for meromorphic Higgs bundles through topological
recursion, arXiv:1411.1023 (2014).
[29] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Edge-contraction operations on cell graphs and 2D TQFT, to appear in Journal
of Algebra (2017).
[30] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Lectures on the topological recursion for Higgs bundles and quantum curves, to
appear in IMS Lecture Notes Series, National University of Singapore. arXiv:1509.09007 (2015).
[31] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Interplay between opers, quantum curves, WKB analysis, and Higgs bundles,
arXiv:1702.00511 (2017).
[32] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Mirror of orbifold Hurwitz numbers as a spectral curve, preprint (2017).
[33] O. Dumitrescu and M. Mulase, Category of cell graphs and cohomological field theory, in preparation.
[34] O. Dumitrescu, M. Mulase, A. Sorkin and B. Safnuk, The spectral curve of the Eynard-Orantin recursion via the
Laplace transform, in “Algebraic and Geometric Aspects of Integrable Systems and Random Matrices,” Dzhamay,
Maruno and Pierce, Eds. Contemporary Mathematics 593, 263–315 (2013).
[35] P. Dunin-Barkowski, M. Mulase, P. Norbury, A. Popolitov, and S. Shadrin, Quantum spectral curve for the
Gromov-Witten theory of the complex projective line, arXiv:1312.5336 [math-ph] (2013).
[36] P. Dunin-Barkowski, N. Orantin, S. Shadrin, and L. Spitz, Identification of the Givental formula with the spectral
curve topological recursion procedure, arXiv:1211.4021 [physics.math-ph (math.AG, physics.hep-th)] (2012).
[37] B. Eynard, M. Mulase and B. Safnuk, The Laplace transform of the cut-and-join equation and the BouchardMariño conjecture on Hurwitz numbers, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences 47,
629–670 (2011).
[38] B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Communications in Number
Theory and Physics 1, 347–452 (2007).
[39] B. Fang, C.-C. M. Liu, and Z. Zong, All genus open-closed mirror symmetry for affine toric Calabi-Yau 3orbifolds, arXiv:1310.4818 [math.AG] (2013).
52
O. DUMITRESCU AND M. MULASE
[40] B. Fang, C.-C. M. Liu, and Z. Zong, On the Remodeling Conjecture for Toric Calabi-Yau 3-Orbifolds,
arXiv:1604.07123 (2016).
[41] C. Frohman, R. Gelca, and W. Lofaro, The A-polynomial from the noncommutative viewpoint, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 354, 735–747 (2002).
[42] D. Gaiotto, Opers and TBA, arXiv:1403.6137 [hep-th] (2014).
[43] D. Gaiotto, G.W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approximation,
arXiv:0907.3987 [hep-th] (2009).
[44] S. Garoufalidis, On the characteristic and deformation varieties of a knot, Geometry & Topology Monographs
7, 291–309 (2004).
[45] S. Garoufalidis and T.T.Q. Lê, The colored Jones function is qholonomic, Geometry and Topology 9, 1253–1293
(2005).
[46] S. Garoufalidis and R. Kashaev, From state integrals to q-series, arXiv:1304.2705 (2013).
[47] S. Garoufalidis and R. Kashaev, Evaluation of state integrals at rational points, Commun. Number Theory Phys.
7, (2015).
[48] A. Givental, Gromov-Witten invariants and quantization of quadratic hamiltonians, Moscow Mathematical Journal 1, 551–568 (2001).
[49] A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda, and M. Mariño, Topological strings from Quantum Mechanics, arXiv:1410.3382. (2014).
[50] S. Gukov and P. Sulkowski, A-polynomial, B-model, and quantization, arXiv:1108.0002v1 [hep-th] (2011).
[51] R.C. Gunning, Special coordinate coverings of Riemann surfaces, Math. Annalen 170, 67–86 (1967).
[52] N.J. Hitchin, The self-duality equations on a Riemann surface, Proc. London Math. Soc. (Ser. 3) 55, 59–126
(1987).
[53] N.J. Hitchin, Stable bundles and integrable systems, Duke Math. J. 54, 91–114 (1987).
[54] A. Hodge and M. Mulase, Hitchin integrable systems, deformations of spectral curves, and KP-type equations,
Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 59, 31–77 (2010).
[55] L. Hollands, Topological strings and quantum curves, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam arXiv:0911.3413
[hep-th] (2009).
[56] D. Huybrechts and M. Lehn, Stable pairs on curves and surfaces, arXiv:alg-geom/9211001 (1992).
[57] K. Iwaki, O. Marchal, and A. Saens-Rodriguez, Painlevé equations, topological type property and reconstruction
by the topological recursion, arXiv:1601.02517 (2016).
[58] K. Iwaki and A. Saens-Rodriguez, Quantum Curve and the First Painlevé Equation, arXiv:1507.06557 (2015).
[59] A. Kapustin and E. Witten, Electric-magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program, Communications
in Number Theory and Physics 1, 1–236 (2007).
[60] R. Kashaev and M. Mariño, Operators from mirror curves and the quantum dilogarithm, arXiv:1501.01014 [hepth], (2015).
[61] M. Kazarian and S. Lando, An algebro-geometric proof of Witten?s conjecture, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 20, 1079–1089 (2007).
[62] M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli space of curves and the matrix Airy function, Communications
in Mathematical Physics 147, 1–23 (1992).
[63] M. Kontsevich and Y.I. Manin, Gromov-Witten classes, quantum cohomology, and enumerative geometry, Communications in Mathematical Physics 164, 525–562 (1994),
[64] M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Wall-crossing structures in Donaldson-Thomas invariants, integrable systems
and Mirror Symmetry, arXiv:1303.3253 [math.AG] (2013).
[65] M. Kontsevich and Y. Soibelman, Airy structures and symplectic geometry of topological recursion, arXiv:
arXiv:1701.09137 [mathAG] (2017).
[66] B. Kostant, The principal three-dimensional subgroup and the Betti numbers of a complex simple Lie group,
Amer. J. Math., 81, 973–1032 (1959).
[67] J. Lurie, On the classification of topological field theories, Current Developments in Mathematics 2008, 129–280
(2009).
[68] A. Marian, D. Oprea, R. Pandharipande, A. Pixton, and D. Zvonkine, The Chern character of the Verlinde
bundle over Mg,n , arXiv:1311.3028 (2013).
[69] M. Mariño, Open string amplitudes and large order behavior in topological string theory, J. High Energy Physics
0803-060, 1–33 (2008).
[70] M. Mariño, Spectral Theory and Mirror Symmetry, arXiv:1506.07757 (2015).
[71] M. Mirzakhani, Simple geodesics and Weil-Petersson volumes of moduli spaces of bordered Riemann surfaces,
Invent. Math. 167, 179–222 (2007).
[72] M. Mirzakhani, Weil-Petersson volumes and intersection theory on the moduli space of curves, J. Amer. Math.
Soc. 20, 1–23 (2007).
[73] T. Mochizuki, Wild harmonic bundles and wild pure twistor D-modules, arXiv:0803.1344, 621 pages (2010).
[74] M. Mulase, Algebraic theory of the KP equations, in “Perspectives in Mathematical Physics,” R. Penner and
S.-T. Yau, Editors, International Press Company, 157–223 (1994).
[75] M. Mulase and M. Penkava, Ribbon graphs, quadratic differentials on Riemann surfaces, and algebraic curves
defined over Q, The Asian Journal of Mathematics 2 (4), 875–920 (1998).
INVITATION TO 2D TQFT AND QUANTIZATION
53
[76] M. Mulase and M. Penkava, Topological recursion for the Poincaré polynomial of the combinatorial moduli space
of curves, Advances in Mathematics 230, 1322–1339 (2012).
[77] M. Mulase and B. Safnuk, Mirzakhani’s Recursion Relations, Virasoro Constraints and the KdV Hierarchy,
Indian Journal of Mathematics 50, 189–228 (2008).
[78] M. Mulase, S. Shadrin, and L. Spitz, The spectral curve and the Schrödinger equation of double Hurwitz numbers
and higher spin structures, Communications in Number Theory and Physics 7, 1–19 (2013).
[79] M. Mulase and P. Sulkowski, Spectral curves and the Schrödinger equations for the Eynard-Orantin recursion,
arXiv:1210.3006 (2012).
[80] M. Mulase and N. Zhang, Polynomial recursion formula for linear Hodge integrals, Communications in Number
Theory and Physics 4, 267–294 (2010).
[81] D. Mumford, Towards an enumerative geometry of the moduli space of curves, in “Arithmetic and Geometry,”
M. Artin and J. Tate, eds., Part II, 271–328, Birkhäuser, 1983.
[82] D. Mumford, J. Fogarty, and F. Kirwan, Geometric invariant theory, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer
Grenzgebiete, 294 pages, Springer-Verlag (1994).
[83] M.S. Narasimhan and C.S. Seshadri, Stable and unitary vector bundles on a compact Riemann surface, Annals
of Mathematics, Second Series, 82, 540–567 (1965).
[84] T. Nakatsu and K. Takasaki, Open string amplitudes of closed topological vertex, arXiv:1507.07053 [math-ph]
(2015).
[85] A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipande, Gromov-Witten theory, Hurwitz numbers, and matrix models, I, Proc.
Symposia Pure Math. 80, 325–414 (2009).
[86] H. Ooguri, P. Sulkowski, M. Yamazaki, Wall Crossing As Seen By Matrix Models, arXiv:1005.1293 (2010).
[87] M. Ossendrijver, Ancient Babylonian astronomers calculated Jupiter’s position from the area under a timevelocity graph, Science 351, Issue 6272, 482–484 (2016).
[88] E. Robson, Words and pictures: New light on Plimpton 322 , Mathematical Association of America Monthly
109, 105–120 (2002).
[89] G. Segal, Geometric aspect of quantum field theory, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians,
Kyoto, Japan 1990, 1387–1396 (1991).
[90] C.T. Simpson, Higgs bundles and local systems, Publications Mathématiques de l’I.H.E.S. 75, 5–95 (1992).
[91] C. Teleman, The structure of 2D semi-simple field theories, Inventiones Mathematicae 188, 525–588 (2012).
[92] T.R.S. Walsh and A.B. Lehman, Counting rooted maps by genus. I, Journal of Combinatorial Theory B-13,
192–218 (1972).
[93] E. Witten, Two dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space, Surveys in Differential Geometry
1, 243–310 (1991).
[94] E. Witten, Mirror symmetry, Hitchin’s equations, and Langlands duality, arXiv:0802.0999 (2008).
[95] D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms, in “Quanta of maths,” Clay Math. Proc., vol. 11, Amer. Math. Soc.,
Providence, RI, pp. 659–675 (2010).
[96] J. Zhou, Quantum Mirror Curves for C3 and the Resolved Confiold, arXiv:1207.0598v1 [math.AG] (2012).
Olivia Dumitrescu: Department of Mathematics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI
48859, U.S.A., and Simion Stoilow Institute of Mathematics, Romanian Academy, 21 Calea Grivitei Street,
010702 Bucharest, Romania
E-mail address: [email protected]
Motohico Mulase: Department of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616–8633, U.S.A.,
and Kavli Institute for Physics and Mathematics of the Universe, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa,
Japan
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Containment for Rule-Based Ontology-Mediated Queries
Pablo Barceló
Gerald Berger
Andreas Pieris
Center for Semantic Web
Research &
DCC, University of Chile
Institute of Information
Systems
TU Wien
School of Informatics
University of Edinburgh
arXiv:1703.07994v3 [cs.DB] 19 Apr 2017
[email protected]
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Following recent work [24, 26, 27, 40], we focus on the case
where the ontology is defined by a set of tuple-generating dependencies (tgds), a.k.a. existential rules or Datalog± rules.
Handling such OMQs implies new challenges for classical
database tasks. Interestingly, some of these challenges are
by now well-studied; most notably (a) query evaluation [8,
24, 25, 27]: given an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q), a database D over
S, and a tuple of constants c̄, does c̄ belong to the evaluation
of q over every extension of D that satisfies Σ, or, equivalently, is c̄ a certain answer for Q over D? and (b) relative
expressiveness [19, 42, 43]: how does the expressiveness of
OMQs compare to the one of other query languages? Surprisingly, despite its prominence, no work to date has carried out an in-depth investigation of containment for OMQs
based on tgds and UCQs.
Query containment is a fundamental static analysis task
that amounts to check if the evaluation of a query is always contained in the evaluation of another query. Several
database tasks crucially depend on the ability to check query
containment; these include, e.g., query optimization, viewbased query answering, querying incomplete databases, integrity checking, and implication of dependencies: cf. [22,
30, 36, 37, 39, 45]. A particularly important instance of the
containment problem is the one defined by the class of CQs.
It follows from the seminal work of Chandra and Merlin [29]
that CQ containment is polynomially equivalent to CQ evaluation, and thus NP-complete. The NP upper bound is not
affected if we consider UCQs [54]. This is seen as a positive
result for practical applications that rely on UCQ containment, as the input (the two UCQs) is small. In addition,
it shows a stark difference with more expressive relational
query languages, e.g., relational algebra (or, equivalently,
first-order logic), for which containment is undecidable.
The main goal of this work is to understand up to which
extend the good computational properties of UCQ containment discussed above can be leveraged to the containment
problem for OMQs based on tgds and UCQs (simply called
OMQs from now on). In particular, we want to understand
which classes of tgds guarantee the decidability of the problem, and, whenever this is the case, how can we obtain complexity bounds that are reasonable for practical purposes.
We also want to understand what is the exact relationship
between OMQ containment and evaluation for such classes.
Let us stress that, apart from the traditional applications of
containment mentioned above, it has been recently shown
that OMQ containment has applications on other important static analysis tasks for OMQs, namely, distribution
over components [15], and UCQ rewritability [16].
Many efforts have been dedicated to identifying restrictions
on ontologies expressed as tuple-generating dependencies
(tgds), a.k.a. existential rules, that lead to the decidability for the problem of answering ontology-mediated queries
(OMQs). This has given rise to three families of formalisms:
guarded, non-recursive, and sticky sets of tgds. In this work,
we study the containment problem for OMQs expressed in
such formalisms, which is a key ingredient for solving static
analysis tasks associated with them. Our main contribution
is the development of specially tailored techniques for OMQ
containment under the classes of tgds stated above. This enables us to obtain sharp complexity bounds for the problems
at hand, which in turn allow us to delimitate its practical
applicability. We also apply our techniques to pinpoint the
complexity of problems associated with two emerging applications of OMQ containment: distribution over components
and UCQ rewritability of OMQs.
1.
[email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Motivation and goals. The novel application of knowledge representation tools for handling incomplete and heterogeneous data is giving rise to a new field, recently coined
as knowledge-enriched data management [6]. A crucial problem in this field is ontology-based data access (OBDA) [51],
which refers to the utilization of ontologies (i.e., sets of logical sentences) for providing a unified conceptual view of various data sources. Users can then pose their queries solely in
the schema provided by the ontology, abstracting away from
the specifics of the individual sources. In OBDA, one interprets the ontology Σ and the user query q, which is typically
a union of conjunctive queries (UCQ), or, equivalently, the
expressions defined by the select-project-join-union operators of relational algebra, as two components of one composite query Q = (S, Σ, q), known as ontology-mediated query
(OMQ); S is called the data schema, indicating that Q will
be posed on databases over S [19]. Therefore, OBDA is
often realized as the problem of answering OMQs.
1
The context. As one might expect, when considered in
its full generality, i.e., without any restrictions on the set
of tgds, the OMQ containment problem is undecidable. To
understand, on the other hand, which restrictions lead to
decidability, we recall the two main reasons that render the
general containment problem undecidable. These are:
The above small witness property allows us to devise a simple non-deterministic algorithm, which makes use of query
evaluation as a subroutine for checking non-containment of
Q1 in Q2 : guess a database D over S of size at most k, and
then check if there is a certain answer for Q1 over D that is
not a certain answer for Q2 over D. This algorithm allows
us to obtain optimal upper bounds for OMQs based on linear and sticky sets of tgds; however, the exact complexity of
OMQs based on non-recursive sets of tgds remains open:
Undecidability of query evaluation: OMQ evaluation is, in
general, undecidable [12], and it can be reduced to OMQ
containment. More precisely, OMQ containment is undecidable whenever query evaluation for at least one of the
involved languages (i.e., the language of the left-hand or the
right-hand side query) is undecidable.
• For OMQs based on linear tgds, the problem is in
PSpace, and in ΠP
2 if the arity is fixed. The PSpacehardness is shown by reduction from query evaluation [47], while the ΠP
2 -hardness is inherited from [17].
Undecidability of containment for Datalog: decidability of
query evaluation does not ensure decidability of query containment. A prime example is Datalog, or, equivalently, the
OMQ language based on full tgds. Datalog containment is
undecidable [55], and thus, OMQ containment is undecidable if the involved languages extend Datalog.
• For OMQs based on sticky sets of tgds, the problem is
in coNExpTime, and in ΠP
2 if the arity of the schema
is fixed. The coNExpTime-hardness is shown by exploiting the standard tiling problem for the exponential grid, while the ΠP
2 -hardness is inherited from [17].
• Finally, for OMQs based on non-recursive sets of tgds,
containment is in ExpSpace and hard for PNEXP , even
for fixed arity. The lower bound is shown by exploiting
a recently introduced tiling problem [34].
In view of the above observations, we focus on languages
that (a) have a decidable query evaluation, and (b) do not
extend Datalog. The main classes of tgds, which give rise to
OMQ languages with the desirable properties, can be classified into three main families depending on the underlying
syntactic restrictions: (i) guarded tgds [24], which contain inclusion dependencies and linear tgds, (ii) non-recursive sets
of tgds [35], and (iii) sticky sets of tgds [27].
While the decidability of containment for the above OMQ
languages can be established via translations into query languages with a decidable containment problem, such translations do not lead to optimal complexity upper bounds (details are given below). Therefore, the main goal of our paper
is to develop specially tailored decision procedures for the
containment problem under the OMQ languages in question,
and ideally obtain precise complexity bounds. Our second
goal is to exploit such techniques in the study of distribution
over components and UCQ rewritability of OMQs.
We conclude that in all these cases OMQ containment
is harder than evaluation, with one exception: the OMQs
based on linear tgds over schemas of unbounded arity.
Guarded tgds. The OMQ language based on guarded tgds
is not UCQ rewritable, which forces us to develop different
tools to study its containment problem. Let us remark that
guarded OMQs can be rewritten as guarded Datalog queries
(by exploiting the translations devised in [9, 43]), for which
containment is decidable in 2ExpTime [20]. But, again, the
known rewritings are very large [43], and hence the reduction of containment for guarded OMQs to containment for
guarded Datalog does not yield optimal upper bounds.
To obtain optimal bounds for the problem in question,
we exploit two-way alternating parity automata on trees
(2WAPA) [32]. We first show that if Q1 and Q2 are guarded
OMQs such that Q1 is not contained in Q2 , then this is
witnessed over a class of “tree-like” databases that can be
represented as the set of trees accepted by a 2WAPA A. We
then build a 2WAPA B with exponentially many states that
recognizes those trees accepted by A that represent witnesses
to non-containment of Q1 in Q2 . Hence, Q1 is contained in
Q2 iff B accepts no tree. Since the emptiness problem for
2WAPA is feasible in exponential time in the number of
states [32], we obtain that containment for guarded OMQs
is in 2ExpTime. A matching lower bound, even for fixed
arity schemas, follows from [16].
Similar ideas based on 2WAPA have been recently used
to show that containment for OMQs based on expressive
description logics (DLs) is in 2ExpTime [16]. In the DL
context, schemas consist only of unary and binary relations.
Our automata construction, however, is different from the
one in [16] for two reasons: (a) we need to deal with higher
arity relations, and (b) even for unary and binary relations,
our OMQ language allows to express properties that are not
expressible by the DL-based OMQ languages studied in [16].
Our contributions. The complexity of OMQ containment
for the languages in question is given in Table 1. Using
small fonts, we recall the complexity of OMQ evaluation in
order to stress that containment is, in general, harder than
evaluation. We divide our contributions as follows:
Linear, non-recursive and sticky sets of tgds. The OMQ
languages based on linear, non-recursive, and sticky sets
of tgds share a useful property: they are UCQ rewritable
(implicit in [40]), that is, an OMQ can be rewritten into
a UCQ. This property immediately yields decidability for
their associated containment problems, since UCQ containment is decidable [54]. However, the obtained complexity
bounds are not optimal, since the UCQ rewritings are
unavoidably very large [40]. To obtain more precise bounds,
we reduce containment to query evaluation, an idea that is
often applied in query containment; see, e.g., [29, 31, 54].
Consider a UCQ rewritable OMQ language O. If Q1 and
Q2 belong to O, both with data schema S, then we can
establish a small witness property, which states that noncontainment of Q1 in Q2 can be witnessed via a database
over S whose size is bounded by an integer k ≥ 0, the maximal size of a disjunct in a UCQ rewriting of Q1 . For linear
tgds, such an integer k is polynomial, but for non-recursive
and sticky sets of tgds it is exponential (implicit in [40]).
Combining languages. The above complexity results refer to
the containment problem relative to a certain OMQ language O, i.e., both queries fall in O. However, it is natural
2
Linear
Sticky
Arbitrary Arity
Bounded Arity
PSpace-c
ΠP
2 -c
PSpace-c
NP-c
coNExpTime-c
ΠP
2 -c
ExpTime-c
NP-c
NEXP
Non-recursive
Guarded
in ExpSpace and P
-hard
in ExpSpace and PNEXP -hard
NExpTime-c
NExpTime-c
2ExpTime-c
2ExpTime-c
2ExpTime-c
ExpTime-c
Table 1: Complexity of OMQ containment – in small fonts, we recall the complexity of OMQ evaluation.
to consider the version of the problem where the involved
OMQs fall in different languages. Unsurprisingly, if the lefthand side query is expressed in a UCQ rewritable OMQ
language (based on linear, non-recursive or sticky sets of
tgds), we can use the algorithm that relies on the small witness property discussed above, which provides optimal upper
bounds for almost all the considered cases (the only exception is the containment of sticky in non-recursive OMQs over
schemas of unbounded arity). Things are more interesting
if the ontology of the left-hand side query is expressed using
guarded tgds, while the ontology of the right-hand side query
is not guarded. By exploiting automata techniques, we show
that containment of guarded in non-recursive OMQs is in
3ExpTime, while containment of guarded in sticky OMQs
is in 2ExpTime. We establish matching lower bounds, even
over schemas of fixed arity, by refining techniques from [31].
size of the UCQs and the maximum arity of the underlying schema, which are typically very small. For such tasks,
a single-exponential time procedure is considered to be acceptable, and it is actually the norm in many cases including
database and verification problems; see, e.g., [1, 50, 52].
For OMQs based on sticky, non-recursive and guarded sets
of tgds, the containment problem becomes coNExpTimecomplete, PNEXP -hard and 2ExpTime-complete, respectively. This means that we require double-exponential time
to solve the problem, which is practically not acceptable.
Nevertheless, for sticky sets of tgds, the runtime is doubleexponential only in the maximum arity of the schema, while
for guarded sets of tgds is double-exponential only in the size
of the UCQs and the maximum arity of the schema. This
is good news since, as said above, the size of the UCQs and
the arity are typically small, and usually UCQs in OMQs
are much smaller than the ontologies.
For non-recursive sets of tgds, on the other hand, the runtime is double-exponential, not only in the maximum arity,
but also in the number of predicates occurring in the ontology. It is unrealistic to assume that the number of predicates
occurring in real-life ontologies is small. This fact, together
with the fact that the precise complexity of OMQ containment for non-recursive sets of tgds is still open, suggests that
a more careful complexity analysis is needed. This is left as
an interesting open problem for future work.
Applications. Our techniques and results on containment for
guarded OMQs can be applied to other important static
analysis tasks, in particular, distribution over components
and UCQ rewritability.
The notion of distribution over components has been introduced in [3], in the context of declarative networking, and
it states that the answer to an OMQ Q can be computed
by parallelizing it over the (maximally connected) components of the database. If this is the case, then Q can always
be evaluated in a distributed and coordination-free manner.
The problem of deciding distribution over components for
OMQs has been recently studied in [15]. However, the exact complexity of the problem for guarded OMQs has been
left open. By exploiting our results on containment, we can
show that it is 2ExpTime-complete.
It is well-known that the OMQ language based on guarded
tgds is not UCQ rewritable. In view of this fact, it is important to study when a given guarded OMQ Q can be rewritten
as a UCQ. This has been studied for OMQs based on central Horn DLs [16, 18]. Interestingly, our automata-based
techniques for guarded OMQ containment can be adapted
to decide in 2ExpTime whether an OMQ based on guarded
tgds over unary and binary relations is UCQ rewritable; a
matching lower bound is inherited from [16]. Our result
generalizes the result that deciding UCQ rewritability for
OMQs based on E LHI, one of the most expressive members of the E L-family of DLs, is 2ExpTime-complete [16].
Organization. Preliminaries are in Section 2. In Section 3
we introduce the OMQ containment problem. Containment
for UCQ rewritable OMQs is studied in Section 4, and for
guarded OMQs in Section 5. In Section 6 we consider the
case where the involved queries fall in different languages.
In Section 7 we discuss the applications of our results on
guarded OMQ containment and we conclude in Section 8.
Proofs and additional details can be found in the appendix.
2. PRELIMINARIES
Databases and conjunctive queries. Let C, N, and V
be disjoint countably infinite sets of constants, (labeled) nulls
and (regular) variables (used in queries and dependencies),
respectively. A schema S is a finite set of relation symbols
(or predicates) with associated arity. We write R/n to denote that R has arity n. A term is a either a constant, null or
variable. An atom over S is an expression of the form R(v̄),
where R ∈ S is of arity n > 0 and v̄ is an n-tuple of terms. A
fact is an atom whose arguments consist only of constants.
An instance over S is a (possibly infinite) set of atoms over
S that contain constants and nulls, while a database over S
is a finite set of facts over S. We may call an instance and a
database over S an S-instance and S-database, respectively.
Discussion on Applicability. As shown in Table 1, the
containment problem for OMQs based on linear sets of
tgds is PSpace-complete, and thus can be solved in singleexponential time. This is not a big practical drawback since
the containment problem corresponds to a static analysis
task. In fact, the runtime is single exponential only in the
3
Ontology-mediated queries.
An ontology-mediated
query (OMQ) is a triple (S, Σ, q), where S is a schema, Σ is a
set of tgds (the ontology), and q is a (U)CQ over S ∪ sch(Σ)
(and possibly other predicates), with sch(Σ) the set of predicates occurring in Σ.1 We call S the data schema. Notice
that the set of tgds can introduce predicates not in S, which
allows us to enrich the schema of the UCQ q. Moreover, the
tgds can modify the content of a predicate R ∈ S, or, in
other words, R can appear in the head of a tgd of Σ. We
have explicitly included S in the specification of the OMQ to
emphasize that it will be evaluated over S-databases, even
though Σ and q might use additional relational symbols.
The semantics of an OMQ is given in terms of certain answers. The certain answers to a UCQ q(x̄) w.r.t. a database
D and a set Σ of tgds is the set of tuples:
\
{c̄ ∈ dom(I)|x̄| | c̄ ∈ q(I)}.
cert (q, D, Σ) =
The active domain of an instance I, denoted dom(I), is the
set of all terms occurring in I.
A conjunctive query (CQ) over S is a formula of the form:
q(x̄) := ∃ȳ R1 (v̄1 ) ∧ · · · ∧ Rm (v̄m ) ,
(1)
where each Ri (v̄i ) (1 ≤ i ≤ m) is an atom without nulls over
S, each variable mentioned in the v̄i ’s appears either in x̄ or
ȳ, and x̄ are the free variables of q. If x̄ is empty, then q
is a Boolean CQ. As usual, the evaluation of CQs is defined
in terms of homomorphisms. Let I be an instance and q(x̄)
a CQ of the form (1). A homomorphism from q to I is a
mapping h, which is the identity on C, from the variables
that appear in q to the set of constants and nulls C ∪ N
such that Ri (h(v̄i )) ∈ I, for each 1 ≤ i ≤ m. The evaluation
of q(x̄) over I, denoted q(I), is the set of all tuples h(x̄) of
constants such that h is a homomorphism from q to I. We
denote by CQ the class of conjunctive queries.
A union of conjunctive queries (UCQ) over S is a formula
of the form q(x̄) := q1 (x̄) ∨ · · · ∨ qn (x̄), where each qi (x̄) is a
CQ of the form (1). The S
evaluation of q(x̄) over I, denoted
q(I), is the set of tuples 1≤i≤n qi (I). We denote by UCQ
the class of union of conjunctive queries.
I⊇D,I|=Σ
Consider an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q). The evaluation of Q over
an S-database D, denoted Q(D), is defined as cert (q, D, Σ).
It is well-known that cert (q, D, Σ) = q(chase(D, Σ)); see,
e.g., [24]. Thus, Q(D) = q(chase(D, Σ)).
Ontology-mediated query languages. We write (C, Q)
for the OMQ language that consists of all OMQs of the form
(S, Σ, q), where Σ falls in the class C of tgds, i.e., C ⊆ TGD
(concrete classes of tgds are discussed below), and the query
q falls in Q ∈ {CQ, UCQ}. A problem that is quite important for our work is OMQ evaluation, defined as follows:
Tgds and the chase procedure. A tuple-generating dependency (tgd) is a first-order sentence of the form:
∀x̄∀ȳ φ(x̄, ȳ) → ∃z̄ ψ(x̄, z̄) ,
(2)
where φ and ψ are conjunctions of atoms without nulls. For
brevity, we write this tgd as φ(x̄, ȳ) → ∃z̄ ψ(x̄, z̄) and use
comma instead of ∧ for conjoining atoms. Notice that φ
can be empty, in which case the tgd is called fact tgd and
is written as ⊤ → ∃z̄ ψ(x̄, z̄). We assume that each variable
in x̄ is mentioned in some atom of ψ. We call φ and ψ
the body and head of the tgd, respectively. The tgd in (2)
is logically equivalent to the expression ∀x̄(qφ (x̄) → qψ (x̄)),
where qφ (x̄) and qψ (x̄) are the CQs ∃ȳ φ(x̄, ȳ) and ∃z̄ ψ(x̄, z̄),
respectively. Thus, an instance I over S satisfies this tgd
iff qφ (I) ⊆ qψ (I). We say that an instance I satisfies a set
Σ of tgds, denoted I |= Σ, if I satisfies every tgd in Σ. We
denote by TGD the class of (finite) sets of tgds.
The chase is a useful algorithmic tool when reasoning with
tgds [24, 35, 47, 49]. We start by defining a single chase step.
Let I be an instance over a schema S and τ = φ(x̄, ȳ) →
∃z̄ ψ(x̄, z̄) a tgd over S. We say that τ is applicable w.r.t. I if
there exists a tuple (ā, b̄) of terms in I such that φ(ā, b̄) holds
in I. In this case, the result of applying τ over I with (ā, b̄)
¯
is the instance J that extends I with every atom in ψ(ā, ⊥),
¯
where ⊥ is the tuple obtained by simultaneously replacing
each variable z ∈ z̄ with a fresh distinct null not occurring
PROBLEM :
INPUT :
QUESTION :
It is well-known that Eval(TGD, CQ) is undecidable; implicit
in [12]. This has led to a flurry of activity for identifying
syntactic restrictions on sets of tgds that make the latter
problem decidable. Such a restriction defines a subclass C
of tgds. The known decidable classes of tgds are classified
into three main decidability paradigms, which, in turn, give
rise to decidable OMQ languages:
Guardedness: A tgd is guarded if its body contains an atom,
called guard, that contains all the body-variables. Although
the chase under guarded tgds does not necessarily terminate,
the problem of deciding whether a tuple of constants is a
certain answer to a UCQ w.r.t. a database and a set of
guarded tgds is decidable. This follows from the fact that
the result of the chase has bounded treewidth (see, e.g., [24]).
Let G be the class of (finite) sets of guarded tgds. Then:
τ,(ā,b̄)
in I. For such a single chase step we write I −−−−→ J.
Let us assume now that I is an instance and Σ a finite set
of tgds. A chase sequence for I under Σ is a sequence:
τ0 ,c̄0
Eval(C, Q)
An OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (C, Q),
an S-database D, and c̄ ∈ dom(D)|x̄| .
Does c̄ ∈ Q(D)?
Proposition 1. [24] Eval(G, CQ) and Eval(G, UCQ) are
2ExpTime-complete, and ExpTime-complete for fixed arity.
τ1 ,c̄1
I0 −−−→ I1 −−−→ I2 · · ·
An important subclass of guarded tgds is the class of linear
tgds whose body consists of a single atom. We write L for
the class of (finite) sets of linear tgds.
of chase steps such that:
(1) I0 = I; (2) forSeach i ≥ 0, τi is
S
a tgd in Σ; and (3) i≥0 Ii |= Σ. We call i≥0 Ii the result
of this chase sequence, which always exists. Although the
result of a chase sequence is not necessarily unique (up to
isomorphism), each such result is equally useful for our purposes, since it can be homomorphically embedded into every
other result. Thus, from now on, we denote by chase(I, Σ)
the result of an arbitrary chase sequence for I under Σ.
Proposition 2. [25, 47] Eval(L, CQ) and Eval(L, UCQ)
are PSpace-complete, and NP-complete for fixed arity.
1
OMQs can be defined for arbitrary first-order theories, not
only tgds, and first-order queries, not only UCQs [19].
4
R(x,y), P(y,z) → ∃w T(x,y,w)
T(x,y,z) → ∃w S(y,w)
PROBLEM :
INPUT :
QUESTION :
R(x,y), P(y,z) → ∃w T(x,y,w)
T(x,y,z) → ∃w S(x,w)
Whenever O1 = O2 = O, we refer to the containment problem by simply writing Cont(O).
In what follows, we establish some simple but fundamental results, which help to better understand the nature of our
problem. We first investigate the relationship between evaluation and containment, which in turn allows us to obtain
an initial boundary for the decidability of our problem, i.e.,
we can obtain a positive result only if the evaluation problem for the involved OMQ languages is decidable (e.g., those
introduced in the previous section). We then focus on the
OMQ languages introduced in Section 2 and observe that,
once we fix the class of tgds, it does not make a difference
whether we consider CQs or UCQs. In other words, we show
that an OMQ in (C, UCQ), where C ∈ {G, L, NR, S}, can be
rewritten as an OMQ in (C, CQ). This fact simplifies our
later complexity analysis since for establishing upper (resp.,
lower) bounds it suffices to focus on CQs (resp., UCQs).
×
(a)
(b)
R(x,y), P(y,z) → ∃w T(x,y,w)
T(x,y,z) → ∃w S(x,w)
Figure 1: Stickiness and Marking.
Non-recursiveness: A set Σ of tgds is non-recursive (a.k.a.
acyclic [35, 48]), if its predicate graph, the directed graph
that encodes how the predicates of sch(Σ) depend on each
other, is acyclic. Non-recursiveness ensures the termination
of the chase, and thus decidability of OMQ evaluation. Let
NR be the class of non-recursive (finite) sets of tgds. Then:
3.1 Evaluation vs. Containment
As one might expect, OMQ evaluation and OMQ containment are strongly connected. In fact, as we explain below,
the former can be easily reduced to the latter. But let us
first introduce some auxiliary notation. Consider a database
D and a tuple c̄ = (c1 , . . . , cn ) ∈ dom(D)n , where n ≥ 0.
We denote by qD,c̄ (x̄), where x̄ = (xc1 , . . . , xcn ), the CQ
obtained from the conjunction of atoms occurring in D after replacing each constant c with the variable xc . Consider
now an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (C, CQ), where C is some
class of tgds, an S-database D, and a tuple c̄ ∈ dom(D)|x̄| .
It is not difficult to show that
Proposition 3. [48] Eval(NR, CQ) and Eval(NR, UCQ)
are NExpTime-complete, even for fixed arity.
Stickiness: This condition ensures neither termination nor
bounded treewidth of the chase. Instead, the decidability of
OMQ evaluation is obtained by exploiting query rewriting
techniques (more details on query rewriting are given in Section 4). The goal of stickiness is to capture joins among variables that are not expressible via guarded tgds, but without
forcing the chase to terminate. The key property underlying
this condition can be described as follows: during the chase,
terms that are associated (via a homomorphism) with variables that appear more than once in the body of a tgd (i.e.,
join variables) are always propagated (or “stick”) to the inferred atoms. This is illustrated in Figure 1(a); the left set
of tgds is sticky, while the right set is not. The formal definition is based on an inductive marking procedure that marks
the variables that may violate the semantic property of the
chase described above [27]. Roughly, during the base step
of this procedure, a variable that appears in the body of a
tgd τ but not in every head-atom of τ is marked. Then,
the marking is inductively propagated from head to body as
shown in Figure 1(b). Finally, a finite set of tgds Σ is sticky
if no tgd in Σ contains two occurrences of a marked variable.
Let S be the class of sticky (finite) sets of tgds. Then:
c̄ ∈ Q(D) ⇐⇒ (sch(Σ), ∅, qD,c̄ ) ⊆ (sch(Σ), Σ, q).
|
{z
} |
{z
}
Q1
Q2
Let O∅ be the OMQ language that consists of all OMQs of
the form (S, ∅, q), i.e., the set of tgds is empty, where q is a
CQ. It is clear that Q1 ∈ O∅ and Q2 ∈ (C, CQ). Therefore,
for every OMQ language O = (C, CQ), where C is a class of
tgds, we immediately get that:
Proposition 5. Eval(O) can be reduced in polynomial
time into Cont(O∅ , O).
We now show that the problem of evaluation is reducible
to the complement of containment. Let us say that, for technical reasons which will be made clear in a while, we focus
our attention on classes C of tgds that are closed under fact
tgd extension, i.e., for every set Σ ∈ C, a set obtained from
Σ by adding a (finite) set of fact tgds is still in C. This is
not an unnatural assumption since every reasonable class of
tgds, such as the ones introduced above, enjoy this property. Consider now an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (C, CQ),
where C is some class of tgds, an S-database D, and a tuple
c̄ ∈ dom(D)|x̄| . It is easy to see that
Proposition 4. [27] Eval(S, CQ) and Eval(S, UCQ) are
ExpTime-complete, and NP-complete for fixed arity.
3.
Cont(O1 , O2 )
Two OMQs Q1 ∈ O1 and Q2 ∈ O2 .
Does Q1 ⊆ Q2 ?
OMQ CONTAINMENT: THE BASICS
The goal of this work is to study in depth the problem of
checking whether an OMQ Q1 is contained in an OMQ Q2 ,
both over the same data schema S, or, equivalently, whether
Q1 (D) ⊆ Q2 (D) over every (finite) S-database D. In this
case we write Q1 ⊆ Q2 ; we write Q1 ≡ Q2 if Q1 ⊆ Q2 and
Q2 ⊆ Q1 . The OMQ containment problem in question is
defined as follows; O1 and O2 are OMQ languages (C, Q),
where C is a class of tgds (e.g., linear, non-recursive, sticky,
etc.), and Q ∈ {CQ, UCQ}:
c̄ ∈ Q(D) ⇐⇒ (S, Σ⋆D , qc̄⋆ ) 6⊆ (S, ∅, ∃x P (x)),
|
{z
} |
{z
}
Q1
Q2
Σ⋆D
where
is obtained from Σ by renaming each predicate R
in Σ into R⋆ ∈
6 S and adding the set of fact tgds
{⊤ → R⋆ (c1 , . . . , ck ) | R(c1 , . . . , ck ) ∈ D},
5
3.3 Plan of Attack
qc̄⋆ is obtained from q(c̄) by renaming each predicate R into
R⋆ 6∈ S, and the predicate P does not occur in S. Indeed, the
above equivalence holds since P 6∈ S implies that Q2 (D) =
∅, for every S-database D. Since C is closed under fact
tgd extension, Q1 ∈ (C, CQ), while Q2 ∈ O∅ . We write
coCont(O1 , O2 ) for the complement of Cont(O1 , O2 ). Hence,
for every OMQ language O = (C, CQ), where C is a class of
tgds (closed under fact tgd extension), it holds that:
We are now ready to proceed with the complexity analysis
of containment for the OMQ languages in question. Our
plan of attack can be summarized as follows:
• We consider, in Section 4, Cont((C, CQ)), for C ∈
{L, NR, S}. These languages enjoy a crucial property,
called UCQ rewritability, which is very useful for our
purposes. This property allows us to show the following result: if the containment does not hold, then
this is witnessed via a “small” database, which in turn
allows us to devise simple guess-and-check algorithms.
• We then proceed, in Section 5, with Cont((G, CQ)).
This OMQ language does not enjoy UCQ rewritability,
and the task of establishing a small witness property
as above turned out to be challenging. However, we
show the following: if the containment does not hold,
then this is witnessed via a “tree-shaped” database,
which allows us to devise a decision procedure based
on two-way alternating parity automata on finite trees.
• In Section 6, we study the case where the OMQ containment problem involves two different languages. If
the left-hand side language is UCQ rewritable, then we
can devise a guess-and-check algorithm by exploiting
the above small witness property. The challenging case
is when the left-hand side language is (G, CQ), where
again we employ techniques based on tree automata.
Proposition 6. Eval(O) can be reduced in polynomial
time into coCont(O, O∅ ).
By definition, O∅ is contained in every OMQ language
(C, CQ), where C is a class of tgds. Therefore, as a corollary
of Propositions 5 and 6, we obtain an initial boundary for the
decidability of OMQ containment: we can obtain a positive
result only if the evaluation problem for the involved OMQ
languages is decidable. More formally:
Corollary 7. Cont(O1 , O2 ) is undecidable if Eval(O1 ) is
undecidable or Eval(O2 ) is undecidable.
Can we prove the converse of Corollary 7: Cont(O1 , O2 )
is decidable if both Eval(O1 ) and Eval(O2 ) are decidable?
The answer to this question is negative. This is due to the
fact that containment of Datalog queries is undecidable [55].
Since Datalog queries can be directly encoded in the OMQ
language based on the class F of full tgds, i.e., those without
existentially quantified variables, we obtain the following:
4. UCQ REWRITABLE LANGUAGES
Proposition 8. [55] Cont((F, CQ)) is undecidable.
We now focus on OMQ languages that enjoy the crucial
property of UCQ rewritability.
This result, combined with the fact that Eval(F) is decidable (since the chase under full tgds always terminates), implies that the converse of Corollary 7 does not hold. Proposition 8 also rules out the OMQ languages that are based
on classes of tgds that extend F; e.g., the weak versions of
the ones introduced in Section 2, called weakly guarded [24],
weakly acyclic [35], and weakly sticky [27] that guarantee the
decidability of OMQ evaluation.2 The question that comes
up concerns the decidability and complexity of containment
for the OMQ languages that are based on the non-weak versions of the above classes, i.e., guarded, non-recursive, and
sticky. This will be the subject of the next two sections.
Definition 1. (UCQ Rewritability) An OMQ language
(C, CQ), where C ⊆ TGD, is UCQ rewritable if, for each
OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (C, CQ) we can construct a UCQ
q ′ (x̄) such that Q(D) = q ′ (D) for every S-database D.
We proceed to establish our desired small witness property, based on UCQ rewritability. By the definition of UCQ
rewritability, for each language O that is UCQ rewritable,
there exists a computable function fO from O to the natural numbers such that the following holds: for every OMQ
Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ O, and UCQ rewriting q1 (x̄) ∨ · · · ∨ qn (x̄)
of Q, it is the case that max1≤i≤n {|qi |} ≤ fO (Q), where |qi |
denotes the number of atoms occurring in qi . Then:
3.2 From UCQs to CQs
Before we proceed with the complexity analysis of containment for the OMQ languages in question, let us state
the following useful result:
Proposition 10. Consider a UCQ rewritable language
O, and two OMQs Q ∈ O and Q′ ∈ (TGD, CQ), both with
data schema S. If Q 6⊆ Q′ , then there exists an S-database
D, where |D| ≤ fO (Q), such that Q(D) 6⊆ Q′ (D).
Proposition 9. Given an OMQ Q ∈ (C, UCQ), where
C ∈ {G, L, NR, S}, we can construct in polynomial time an
OMQ Q′ ∈ (C, CQ) such that Q ≡ Q′ .
In Proposition 10 we assume that the left-hand side query
falls in a UCQ rewritable language, be we do not pose any restriction on the language of the right-hand side query. Thus,
we immediately get a decision procedure for Cont(O1 , O2 )
if O1 is UCQ rewritable and Eval(O2 ) is decidable. Given
Q1 = (S, Σ1 , q1 (x̄)) ∈ O1 and Q2 = (S, Σ2 , q2 (x̄)) ∈ O2 :
The proof of Proposition 9 relies on the idea of encoding
boolean operations (in our case the ‘or’ operator) using a set
of atoms; this idea has been used in several other works (see,
e.g., [14, 21, 41]). Proposition 9 allows us to focus on OMQs
that are based on CQs; in fact, Cont((C1 , CQ), (C2 , CQ)) is
C-complete, where C1 , C2 ∈ {G, L, NR, S} and C is a complexity class that is closed under polynomial time reductions, iff Cont((C1 , UCQ), (C2 , UCQ)) is C-complete.
1. Guess an S-database D such that |D| ≤ fO1 (Q1 ), and
a tuple c̄ ∈ dom(D)|x̄| ; and
2
2. Verify that c̄ ∈ Q1 (D) and c̄ 6∈ Q2 (D).
The idea of those classes is the same: relax the conditions
in the definition of the class, so that only those positions that
receive null values during the chase are taken into account.
We immediately get that:
6
Proposition 14. It holds that
|sch(Σ)|
f(NR,CQ) (S, Σ, q) ≤ |q| · max{|body (τ )|}
.
Theorem 11. Cont(O1 , O2 ) is decidable if O1 is UCQ
rewritable and Eval(O2 ) is decidable.
τ ∈Σ
This general result shows that Cont((C, CQ)) is decidable
for every C ∈ {L, NR, S}, but it says nothing about its complexity. This will be the subject of the rest of the section.
Proposition 14 implies that non-containment for queries
that fall in (NR, CQ) is witnessed via a database of at most
exponential size. We show next that this bound is optimal:
4.1 Linearity
The problem of computing UCQ rewritings for OMQs in
(L, CQ) has been studied in [40], where a resolution-based
procedure, called XRewrite, has been proposed. This rewriting algorithm accepts a query Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (L, CQ)
and constructs a UCQ rewriting q ′ (x̄) over S by starting
from q and exhaustively applying rewriting steps based on
resolution. Let us illustrate this via a simple example:
Proposition 15. There are sets of (NR, CQ) OMQs
n
{Qn
1 = (S, Σ1 , q1 )}n>0
R(x, y) → P (y),
n
{Qn
2 = (S, Σ2 , q2 )}n>0 ,
n
where |sch(Σn
1 )| = |sch (Σ2 )| = n + 2, such that for every
n
n−1
S-database D, if Q1 (D) 6⊆ Qn
.
2 (D) then |D| ≥ 2
Let us now focus on the complexity of Cont((NR, CQ)).
The algorithm underlying Theorem 11, together with the
exponential bound provided by Proposition 14, implies that
coCont((NR, CQ)) is feasible in non-deterministic exponential time with access to a NExpTime oracle, which immediately implies that Cont((NR, CQ)) is in ExpSpace. Unfortunately, the exact complexity of Cont((NR, CQ)) is still an
open problem, and we conjecture that is PNEXP -complete;
recall that NExpTime ⊆ PNEXP ⊆ ExpSpace. In what follows, we briefly explain how the PNEXP -hardness is obtained.
To this end, we exploit a tiling problem that has been recently introduced in [34]. Roughly speaking, an instance of
this tiling problem is a triple (m, T1 , T2 ), where m is an integer in unary representation, and T1 , T2 are standard tiling
problems for the exponential grid 2n × 2n . The question is
whether, for every initial condition w of length m, T1 has no
solution with w or T2 has some solution with w. The initial
condition w simply fixes the first m tiles of the first row of
the grid. We construct in polynomial time two (NR, CQ)
queries Q1 and Q2 such that (m, T1 , T2 ) has a solution iff
Q1 ⊆ Q2 . The idea is to force every input database to store
an initial condition w of length m, and then encode the
problem whether Ti has a solution with w into Qi , for each
i ∈ {1, 2}. From the above discussion we get that:
Example 1. Assume that S = {P, T }. Consider the set Σ
consisting of the linear tgds
P (x) → ∃y R(x, y),
and
T (x) → P (x),
and the CQ q(x̄) := ∃y(R(x, y) ∧ P (y)). XRewrite will first
resolve the atom P (y) in q using the second tgd, and produce
the CQ ∃y(R(x, y) ∧ R(x, z)), which is equivalent to the CQ
∃y R(x, y). Then, ∃y R(x, y) will be resolved using the first
tgd, and the CQ P (x) will be obtained, which in turn will
be resolved using the third tgd in order to produce the CQ
T (x). The UCQ rewriting q ′ (x̄) is P (x) ∨ T (x).
It is easy to see that, whenever the input OMQ consists
of linear tgds, during the execution of XRewrite it is not
possible to obtain a CQ that has more atoms than the original one. This is an immediate consequence of the fact that
linear tgds have only one atom in their body. Then:
Proposition 12. f(L,CQ) (S, Σ, q) ≤ |q|.
Having the above result in place, it can be shown that the
algorithm underlying Theorem 11 guesses a polynomially
sized witness to non-containment, and then calls a C-oracle
for solving query evaluation under linear OMQs, where C is
PSpace in general, and NP if the arity is fixed; these complexity classes are obtained from Proposition 2. Therefore,
coCont((L, CQ)) is in PSpace in general, and in ΣP
2 in case
of fixed arity. Regarding the lower bounds, Proposition 5 allows us to inherit the PSpace-hardness of Eval(L, CQ); this
holds even for constant-free tgds. Unfortunately, in the case
of fixed arity, we can only obtain NP-hardness, while Proposition 6 allows to obtain coNP-hardness. Nevertheless, it is
implicit in [17] (see the proof of Theorem 9), where the containment problem for OMQ languages based on description
logics is considered, that Cont((L, CQ)) is ΠP
2 -hard, even for
tgds of the form P (x) → R(x). Then:
Theorem 16. Cont((NR, CQ)) is in ExpSpace, and
PNEXP -hard. The lower bound holds even if the arity of the
schema is fixed and the tgds are without constants.
4.3 Stickiness
We now focus on (S, CQ). As shown in [40], given a query
(S, Σ, q), there exists an execution of XRewrite that constructs a UCQ rewriting q1 (x̄) ∨ · · · ∨ qn (x̄) over S with the
following property: for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, if a variable v
occurs in qi in more than one atom, then v already occurs in
q. This property has been used in [40] to bound the number
of atoms that can appear in a single CQ qi . We write T (q)
for the set of terms (constants and variables) occurring in q,
C(Σ) for the set of constants occurring in Σ, and ar (S) for
the maximum arity over all predicates of S.
Theorem 13. Cont((L, CQ)) is PSpace-complete, and
ΠP
2 -complete if the arity of the schema is fixed. The lower
bounds hold even for tgds without constants.
Proposition 17. It holds that
4.2 Non-Recursiveness
f(S,CQ) ((S, Σ, q)) ≤ |S| · (|T (q)| + |C(Σ)| + 1)|ar (S)| .
Although the OMQ language (NR, CQ) is not explicitly
considered in [40], where the algorithm XRewrite is defined,
the same algorithm can deal with (NR, CQ). By analyzing
the UCQ rewritings constructed by XRewrite, whenever the
input query falls in (NR, CQ), we can establish the following
result; here, body(τ ) denotes the body of the tgd τ :
Proposition 17 implies that non-containment for (S, CQ)
queries is witnessed via a database of at most exponential
size. As for (NR, CQ) queries, we can show that this bound
is optimal; here, for a set Σ of tgds, we denote by ||Σ|| the
number of symbols occurring in Σ:
7
words, we study the problem for (G, BCQ), where BCQ denotes the class of Boolean CQs. This does not affect the
generality of our proof since it is known that Cont((G, CQ))
can be reduced in polynomial time to Cont((G, BCQ)) [16].
Proposition 18. There exists a set of (S, CQ) OMQs
n
n
n
2
{Q = ({S/n}, Σ , q(x̄))}n>0 , where ||Σ || ∈ O(n ),
such that for every Q = ({S}, Σ′ , q ′ (x̄)) ∈ (TGD, CQ) and
{S}-database D, if Qn (D) 6⊆ Q(D) then |D| ≥ 2n−2 .
A first glimpse. As already said, (G, CQ) is not UCQ
rewritable and, therefore, we cannot employ Proposition 10
in order to establish a small witness property as for the languages considered in Section 4. We have tried to establish
a small witness property for (G, CQ) by following a different route, but it turned out to be a difficult task. Nevertheless, we can show a tree witness property, which states
that non-containment for (G, CQ) is witnessed via a treelike database. This allows us to devise a procedure based on
alternating tree automata. Summing up, the proof for the
2ExpTime membership of (G, CQ) proceeds in three steps:
We now study the complexity of Cont((S, CQ)). We first
focus on schemas of unbounded arity. Proposition 17 implies
that the algorithm underlying Theorem 11 runs in exponential time assuming access to a C-oracle, where C is a complexity class powerful enough for solving Eval(S, CQ) and
its complement. But, since Eval(S, CQ) is in ExpTime (see
Proposition 4), both Eval(S, CQ) and its complement are
in NExpTime, and thus, the oracle call is not really needed.
Consequently, coCont((C, CQ)) is in NExpTime.
A matching lower bound is obtained by a reduction from
the standard tiling problem for the exponential grid 2n × 2n .
In fact, the same lower bound has been recently established
in [15]; however, our result is stronger as it shows that the
problem remains hard even if the right-hand side query is
a linear OMQ of a simple form – this is also discussed in
Section 6, where containment of queries that fall in different
OMQ languages is studied. Regarding schemas of fixed arity,
Proposition 17 provides a witness for non-containment of
polynomial size, which implies that the algorithm underlying
Theorem 11 runs in polynomial time with access to an NPoracle. Therefore, coEval(S, CQ) is in ΣP
2 , while a matching
lower bound is implicit in [17]. Then:
1. Establish a tree witness property;
2. Encode the tree-like witnesses as trees that can be accepted by an alternating tree automaton; and
3. Construct an automaton that decides Cont((G, CQ));
in fact, we reduce Cont((G, CQ)) into emptiness for
two-way alternating parity automata on finite trees.
Each one of the above three steps is discussed in more details
in the following three sections.
5.1 Tree Witness Property
From the above informal discussion, it is clear that treelike databases are crucial for our analysis. Let us make this
notion more precise using guarded tree decompositions. A
tree decomposition of a database D is a labeled rooted tree
T = (V, E, λ), where λ : V → 2dom(D) , such that: (i) for
each atom R(t1 , . . . , tn ) ∈ D, there exists v ∈ V such that
λ(v) ⊇ {t1 , . . . , tn }, and (ii) for every term t ∈ dom(D),
the set {v ∈ V | t ∈ λ(v)} induces a connected subtree of
T . The tree decomposition T is called [U ]-guarded, where
U ⊆ V , if, for every node v ∈ V \ U , there exists an atom
R(t1 , . . . , tn ) ∈ D such that λ(v) ⊆ {t1 , . . . , tn }. We write
root (T ) for the root node of T , and DT (v), where v ∈ V ,
for the subset of D induced by λ(v). We are now ready to
formalize the notion of the tree-like database:
Theorem 19. Cont((S, CQ)) is coNExpTime-complete,
even if the set of tgds uses only two constants. In the case
of fixed arity, it is ΠP
2 -complete, even for constant-free tgds.
Clearly, there exists a double-exponential time algorithm
for solving Cont((S, CQ)), which might sound discouraging.
However, Proposition 17 implies that the runtime is doubleexponential only in the maximum arity of the data schema.
5.
GUARDEDNESS
We proceed with the problem of containment for guarded
OMQs, and we establish the following result:
Theorem 20. Cont((G, CQ)) is 2ExpTime-complete.
The lower bound holds even if the arity of the schema is
fixed, and the tgds are without constants.
Definition 2. An S-database D is a C-tree, where C ⊆ D,
if there is a tree decomposition T of D such that:
The lower bound is immediately inherited from [16], where
it is shown that containment for OMQs based on the description logic E LI is 2ExpTime-hard. Recall that a set of
E LI axioms can be equivalently rewritten as a constant-free
set of guarded tgds using only unary and binary predicates,
which implies the lower bound stated in Theorem 20. However, we cannot immediately inherit the desired upper bound
since the DL-based OMQ languages considered in [16] are
either weaker than or incomparable to (G, CQ). Nevertheless, the technique developed in [16] was extremely useful
for our analysis. Actually, our automata-based procedure
exploits a combination of ideas from [16, 44]. The rest of
this section is devoted to providing a high-level explanation
of this procedure.
For the sake of technical clarity, we focus on constant-free
tgds and CQs, but all the results can be extended to the general case at the price of more involved definitions and proofs.
Moreover, for simplicity, we focus on Boolean CQs. In other
1. DT (root (T )) = C and
2. T is [{root (T )}]-guarded.
Roughly, whenever a database D is a C-tree, C is the
cyclic part of D, while the rest of D is tree-like. Interestingly,
for deciding Cont((G, BCQ)) it suffices to focus on databases
that are C-trees and |dom(C)| depends only on the left-hand
side OMQ. Recall that for a schema S we write ar (S) for
the maximum arity over all predicates of S. Then:
Proposition 21. Let Qi = (S, Σi , qi ) ∈ (G, BCQ), for
i ∈ {1, 2}. The following are equivalent:
1. Q1 ⊆ Q2 .
2. Q1 (D) ⊆ Q2 (D), for every C-tree S-database D such
that |dom(C)| ≤ (ar (S ∪ sch(Σ1 )) · |q1 |).
8
for 2WAPA. As usual, given a 2WAPA A, we denote by L(A)
the language of A, i.e., the set of labeled trees it accepts. The
emptiness problem is defined as follows: given a 2WAPA A,
does L(A) = ∅? Thus, given Q1 , Q2 ∈ (G, BCQ), we need
to construct a 2WAPA A such that Q1 ⊆ Q2 iff L(A) = ∅.
It is well-known that deciding whether L(A) = ∅ is feasible
in exponential time in the number of states, and in polynomial time in the size of the input alphabet [32]. Therefore,
we should construct A in double-exponential time, while the
number of states must be at most exponential.
We first need a way to check consistency of labeled trees.
It is not difficult to devise an automaton for this task.
The fact that (1) ⇒ (2) holds trivially, while (2) ⇒ (1) is
shown by using a variant of the notion of guarded unravelling
and compactness. Let us clarify that the above result does
not provide a decision procedure for Cont((G, BCQ)), since
we have to consider infinitely many databases that are Ctrees with |dom(C)| ≤ (ar (S ∪ sch(Σ1 )) · |q1 |).
5.2 Encoding Tree-like Databases
It is generally known that a database D whose treewidth3
is bounded by an integer k can be encoded into a tree over
a finite alphabet of double-exponential size in k that can be
accepted by an alternating tree automaton; see, e.g., [13].
Consider an alphabet Γ, and let N∗ be the set of finite sequences of natural numbers, including the empty sequence.
A Γ-labeled tree is a pair L = (T, λ), where T ⊆ N∗ is closed
under prefixes, and λ : T → Γ is the labeling function. The
elements of T identify the nodes of L. It can be shown
that D and a tree decomposition T of D with width k can
be encoded as a Γ-labeled tree L, where Γ is an alphabet
of double-exponential size in k, such that each node of T
corresponds to exactly one node of L and vice versa.
Consider now a C-tree S-database D, and let T be the tree
decomposition that witnesses that D is a C-tree. The width
of T is at most k = (|dom(C)| + ar (S) − 1), and thus, the
treewidth of D is bounded by k. Hence, from the above discussion, D and T can be encoded as a Γ-labeled tree, where
Γ is of double-exponential size in k. In general, given an Sdatabase D that is a C-tree due to the tree decomposition
T , we show that D and T can be encoded as a ΓS,l -labeled
tree, with |dom(C)| ≤ l and |ΓS,l | being double-exponential
in ar (S) and exponential in |S| and l.
Although every C-tree S-database D can be encoded as a
ΓS,l -labeled tree, the other direction does not hold. In other
words, it is not true that every ΓS,l -labeled tree encodes a
C-tree S-database D and its corresponding tree decomposition. In view of this fact, we need the additional notion
of consistency. A ΓS,l -labeled tree is called consistent if it
satisfies certain syntactic properties – we do not give these
properties here since they are not vital in order to understand the high-level idea of the proof. Now, given a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree L, we can show that L can be decoded
into an S-database JLK that is a C-tree with |dom(C)| ≤ l.
From the above discussion and Proposition 21, we obtain:
Lemma 23. Consider a schema S and an integer l > 0.
There is a 2WAPA CS,l that accepts a ΓS,l -labeled tree L iff
L is consistent. The number of states of CS,l is logarithmic
in the size of ΓS,l . Furthermore, CS,l can be constructed in
polynomial time in the size of ΓS,l .
Now, the crucial task is, given an OMQ Q ∈ (G, BCQ),
to devise an automaton that accepts labeled trees which
correspond to databases that make Q true.
Lemma 24. Let Q = (S, Σ, q) ∈ (G, BCQ). There is a
2WAPA AQ,l , where l > 0, that accepts a consistent ΓS,l labeled tree L iff Q(JLK) 6= ∅. The number of states of
AQ,l is exponential in ||Q|| and l. Furthermore, AQ,l can be
constructed in double-exponential time in ||Q|| and l.
The intuition underlying AQ,l can be described as follows.
AQ,l tries to identify all the possible ways the CQ q can be
mapped to chase(D, Σ), for any C-tree S-database D such
that |dom(C)| ≤ l. It then arrives at possible ways how the
input tree can satisfy Q. These “possible ways” correspond
to squid decompositions, a notion introduced in [24] that indicates which part of the query is mapped to the cyclic part
C of D, and which to the tree-like part of D. The automaton
exhaustively checks all squid decompositions by traversing
the input tree and, at the same time, explores possible ways
how to match the single parts of the squid decomposition
at hand. The automaton finally accepts if it finds a squid
decomposition that can be mapped to chase(D, Σ).
Having the above automata in place, we can proceed with
our main technical result, which shows that Cont(G, BCQ)
can be reduced to the emptiness problem for 2WAPA. But
let us first recall some key results about 2WAPA, which are
essential for our final construction. It is well-known that
languages accepted by 2WAPAs are closed under intersection and complement. Given two 2WAPAs A1 and A2 , we
write A1 ∩ A2 for a 2WAPA, which can be constructed in
polynomial time, that accepts the language L(A1 ) ∩ L(A2 ).
Moreover, for a 2WAPA A, we write A for the 2WAPA,
which is also constructible in polynomial time, that accepts
the complement of L(A). We can now show the following:
Lemma 22. Let Qi = (S, Σi , qi ) ∈ (G, BCQ), for i ∈
{1, 2}. The following are equivalent:
1. Q1 ⊆ Q2 .
2. Q1 (JLK) ⊆ Q2 (JLK), for every consistent ΓS,l -labeled
tree L, where l = (ar (S ∪ sch(Σ1 )) · |q1 |).
5.3 Constructing Tree Automata
Having the above result in place, we can now proceed
with our automata-based procedure. We make use of twoway alternating parity automata (2WAPA) that run on finite labeled trees. Two-way alternating automata process
the input tree while branching in an alternating fashion to
successor states, and thereby moving either down or up the
input tree; the detailed definition can be found in [11]. Our
goal is to reduce Cont((G, BCQ)) to the emptiness problem
Proposition 25. Consider Q1 , Q2 ∈ (G, BCQ). We can
construct in double-exponential time a 2WAPA A, which has
exponentially many states, such that
Q1 ⊆ Q2 ⇐⇒ L(A) = ∅.
Proof (sketch). Let Qi = (S, Σi , qi ), for i ∈ {1, 2},
and l = (ar (S ∪ sch(Σ1 )) · |q1 |). Then A is defined as
(CS,l ∩ AQ1 ,l ) ∩ AQ2 ,l . Since ΓS,l has double-exponential
size, Lemmas 23 and 24 imply that A can be constructed in
3
Recall that the treewidth of a database D is the minimum
width among all possible tree decompositions T = (V, E, λ)
of D, while the width of T is defined as maxv∈V {|λ(v)|} − 1.
9
The lower bounds hold even if the arity of the schema is
fixed. Moreover, for C = L (resp., C ∈ {NR, S}) it holds
even for tgds with one constant (resp., without constants).
double-exponential time, while it has exponentially many
states. Lemma 22 implies that Q1 ⊆ Q2 iff L(A) = ∅.
Proposition 25 implies that Cont((G, BCQ)) is in 2ExpTime, and Theorem 20 follows. Thus, there exists a doubleexponential time algorithm for solving Cont((G, CQ)). Interestingly, the runtime is double-exponential only in the size of
the CQs and the maximum arity of the schema. This can be
obtained by a providing a more refined complexity analysis
of the construction of the 2WAPA A in Proposition 25.
6.
Upper bounds. The 2ExpTime membership when C =
L is an immediate corollary of Theorem 20. This is not
true when C ∈ {NR, S} since the right-hand side query is
not guarded. But in this case, since (NR, CQ) and (S, CQ)
are UCQ rewritable, one can rewrite the right-hand side
query as a UCQ, and then apply the machinery developed
in Section 5 for solving Cont((G, CQ)). More precisely, given
OMQs Q1 ∈ (G, CQ) and Q2 ∈ (C, CQ), where C ∈ {NR, S},
Q1 ⊆ Q2 iff Q1 ⊆ q, where q is a UCQ rewriting of Q2 .
Thus, an immediate decision procedure, which exploits the
algorithm XRewrite, is the following:
COMBINING LANGUAGES
In the previous two sections, we studied the containment
problem relative to a language O, i.e., both OMQs fall in O.
However, it is natural to consider the version of the problem
where the involved OMQs fall in different languages. This is
the goal of this section. Our analysis proceeds by considering
the two cases where the left-hand side (LHS) query falls in
a UCQ rewritable OMQ language, or it is guarded.
1. Let q = XRewrite(Q2 );
2. For each q ′ ∈ q: if Q1 ⊆ q ′ , then proceed; otherwise,
reject; and
3. Accept.
6.1 The LHS Query is UCQ Rewritable
The above procedure runs in triple-exponential time. The
first step is feasible in double-exponential time [40]. Now,
for a single CQ q ′ ∈ q (which is a guarded OMQ with an
empty set of tgds) the check whether Q1 ⊆ q ′ can be done
by using the machinery developed in Section 5, which reduces our problem to checking whether the language of a
2WAPA A is empty. However, it should not be forgotten
that q ′ is of exponential size, and thus, the automaton A has
double-exponentially many states. This in turn implies that
checking whether L(A) = ∅ is in 3ExpTime, as claimed.
Although the above algorithm establishes an optimal upper bound for non-recursive OMQs, a more refined analysis
is needed for sticky OMQs. In fact, we need a more refined
complexity analysis for the problem Cont((G, CQ), UCQ),
that is, to decide whether a guarded OMQ is contained
in a UCQ. To this end, we provide an automata construction different from the one employed in Section 5, which
allows us to establish a refined complexity upper bound for
the problem in question. Consider a (G, CQ) query Q, and
a UCQ q = q1 ∨ · · · ∨ qn . As usual, we write ||Q|| and
||qi || for the number of symbols that occur in Q and qi , respectively, and we write var ≥2 (qi ) for the set of variables
that appear in more than one atom of qi . By exploiting
our new automata-based procedure, we show that the problem of checking if Q ⊆ q is feasible in double-exponential
time in (||Q|| + max1≤i≤n {|var ≥2 (qi )|}), exponential time
in max1≤i≤n {||qi ||}, and polynomial time in n.
This result allows us to show that the above procedure establishes 2ExpTime-membership when the right-hand side
OMQ is sticky. But first we need to recall the following key
properties of the UCQ rewriting q = XRewrite(Q2 ), constructed during the first step of the algorithm:
As an immediate corollary of Theorem 11 we obtain the
following result: Cont((C1 , CQ), (C2 , CQ)), for C1 6= C2 ,
C1 ∈ {L, NR, S} and C2 ∈ {L, NR, S, G}, is decidable. By
exploiting the algorithm underlying Theorem 11, we establish optimal upper bounds for all the problems at hand with
the only exception of Cont((S, CQ), (NR, CQ)). For the latter, we obtain an ExpSpace upper bound, by providing
a similar analysis as for Cont((NR, CQ)), while a NExpTime lower bound is inherited from query evaluation by exploiting Proposition 5. It is rather tedious, and not very
interesting from a technical point of view, to go through all
the containment problems in question4 and explain in details
how the exact upper bounds are obtained; we leave this as
an exercise to the interested reader.
Regarding the matching lower bounds, in most of the cases
they are inherited from query evaluation or its complement
by exploiting Propositions 5 and 6, respectively. There are,
however, some exceptions:
• Cont((S, CQ), (L, CQ)) in the case of unbounded arity,
where the problem is coNExpTime-hard, even for sets
of tgds that use only two constants. This is shown by
a reduction from the standard tiling problem for the
exponential grid 2n × 2n .
• Cont((L, CQ), (S, CQ)) and Cont((S, CQ), (L, CQ)) in
the case of bounded arity, where both problems are
ΠP
2 -hard even for constant-free tgds; implicit in [17].
6.2 The LHS Query is Guarded
We proceed with the case where the LHS query is guarded,
and we show the following result:
1. q consists of double-exponentially many CQs,
Theorem 26. Cont((G, CQ), (C, CQ)) is C-complete:
2ExpTime, C ∈ {L, S},
C =
3ExpTime, C = NR.
2. each CQ of q is of exponential size, and
3. for each q ′ ∈ q, var ≥2 (q ′ ) is a subset of the variables
of the original CQ that appears in Q2 .
4
There are eighteen different cases obtained by considering
all the possible pairs (O1 , O2 ) of OMQ languages, where
O1 6= O2 and O1 is UCQ rewritable, and the two cases
whether the arity of the schema is fixed or not.
By combining these key properties with the complexity analysis performed above, it is now straightforward to show that
Cont((G, CQ), (S, CQ)) is in 2ExpTime.
10
has been left open. Our results on containment for guarded
OMQs allow us to close this problem. But first we need to recall a key result that semantically characterizes distribution
over components. An OMQ Q with data schema S is unsatisfiable if there is no S-database D such that Q(D) 6= ∅.
Moreover, for a CQ q, we write co(q) for its components.
The next result has been shown in [15]:
Lower Bounds. We establish matching lower bounds by
refining techniques from [31], where it is shown that containment of Datalog in UCQ is 2ExpTime-complete, while containment of Datalog in non-recursive Datalog is 3ExpTimecomplete; the lower bounds hold for fixed-arity predicates,
and constant-free rules. Interestingly, the LHS query can
be transformed into a Datalog query such that each rule
has a body-atom that contains all the variables, i.e., is
guarded. This is achieved by increasing the arity of some
predicates in order to have enough positions for all the bodyvariables. However, for each rule, the number of unguarded
variables that we need to guard is constant, and thus, the
arity of the schema remains constant. We conclude that
Cont((G, CQ), (NR, CQ)) is 3ExpTime-hard.
Moreover,
containment of guarded OMQs in UCQs is 2ExpTime-hard,
which in turn allows us to show, by exploiting the construction underlying Proposition 9, that Cont((G, CQ), (L, CQ))
is 2ExpTime-hard, even if the set of linear tgds uses only one
constant, while Cont((G, CQ), (S, CQ)) is 2ExpTime-hard,
even for tgds without constants.
7.
Proposition 27. Let Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (G, CQ). The
following are equivalent:
1. Q distributes over components.
2. Q is unsatisfiable or there exists q̂(x̄) ∈ co(q) such that
(S, Σ, q̂(x̄)) ⊆ Q.
Checking unsatisfiability can be easily reduced to containment. Thus, the above result, together with Theorem 20,
implies that Dist(G, CQ) is in 2ExpTime, while a matching
lower bound is implicit in [15]. Then:
Theorem 28. Dist(G, CQ) is 2ExpTime-complete.
APPLICATIONS
Interestingly, our results on Cont((G, CQ)) can be applied
to other important static analysis tasks, in particular, distribution over components and UCQ rewritability. Each one
of those tasks is considered in the following two sections.
7.2 Deciding UCQ Rewritability
Query rewriting is a well-studied method for evaluating
OMQs using standard database technology. The key idea is
the following: given an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)), combine Σ
and q into a new query qΣ (x̄), the so-called rewriting, which
can then be evaluated over D yielding the same answer as Q
over D, for every S-database D. For this approach to be realistic, though, it is essential that the rewriting is expressed
in a language that can be handled by standard database systems. The typical language that is considered in this setting
is first-order (FO) queries [28]. Notice, however, that due to
Rossman’s Theorem [53], and the fact that OMQs are closed
under homomorphisms, FO and UCQ rewritability coincide.
Recall that some OMQ languages are UCQ rewritable, such
as the ones based on linear, non-recursive and sticky sets of
tgds, while others are not, e.g., guarded OMQs. For those
languages O that are not UCQ rewritable, it is important
to be able to check whether a query Q ∈ O can be rewritten
as a UCQ, in which case we say that it is UCQ rewritable.
This gives rise to the following fundamental static analysis
task for an OMQ language (C, CQ), where C ⊆ TGD:
7.1 Distribution Over Components
The notion of distribution over components has been introduced in [3], and it states that the answer to a query
can be computed by parallelizing it over the (maximally
connected) components of the input database. But let us
first make precise what a component is. A set of atoms
A is connected if for all c, d ∈ dom(A), there exists a sequence α1 , . . . , αn of atoms in A such that c ∈ dom(α1 ),
d ∈ dom(αn ), and dom(αi ) ∩ dom(αi+1 ) 6= ∅, for each
i ∈ {1, . . . , n − 1}. We call B ⊆ A a component of A if
(i) B is connected, and (ii) for every α ∈ A \ B, B ∪ {α}
is not connected.5 Let co(A) be the set of components of
A. We are now ready to introduce the notion of distribution over components. Consider an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q) ∈
(TGD, CQ). We say that Q distributes over components if
Q(D) = Q(D1 ) ∪ · · · ∪ Q(Dn ), where co(D) = {D1 , . . . , Dn },
for every S-database D. In this case, Q(D) can be computed without any communication over a network using a
distribution where every computing node is assigned some
of the components of the database, and every component is
assigned to at least one computing node. In other words, Q
can be evaluated in a distributed and coordination-free manner; for more details on coordination-free evaluation see [3,
4, 5]. Therefore, it would be quite beneficial if we can decide
whether an OMQ distributes over components, and thus, we
obtain the following interesting static analysis task:
PROBLEM :
INPUT :
QUESTION :
UCQRew(C, CQ)
An OMQ Q ∈ (C, CQ).
Is it the case that Q is UCQ rewritable?
The above problem has been studied in [15], where tight
complexity bounds for (L, CQ) and (S, CQ) have been established. However, its exact complexity for guarded OMQs
Bienvenu et al. have recently carried out an in-depth study
of the above problem for OMQ languages based on central Horn-DLs [16]. One of their main results is that the
above problem for the OMQ language based on E LHI, one
of the most expressive members of the E L-family of DLs, is
2ExpTime-complete. Interestingly, by adapting the tree automata techniques developed in Section 5, we can generalize
the above result: deciding UCQ rewritability for the OMQ
language based on guarded tgds over unary and binary relations is in 2ExpTime. Let G2 be the class of (finite) sets
of guarded tgds over unary and binary relations. Then:
5
For technical clarity, the notion of component is defined
only for sets of atoms that do not contain 0-ary atoms.
Theorem 29. UCQRew(G2 , CQ) is 2ExpTime-complete.
PROBLEM :
INPUT :
QUESTION :
Dist(C, CQ)
An OMQ Q ∈ (C, CQ).
Does Q distributes over components?
11
considerably and, in turn, allows us to obtain our desired
semantic characterization of UCQ rewritability:
Since the lower bound is inherited from [16], we concentrate on the upper bound. As in Section 5, we can focus on
BCQs, i.e., it suffices to show that UCQRew(G2 , BCQ) is in
2ExpTime. Our proof proceeds in two steps:
Proposition 30. Let Q = (S, Σ, q) ∈ (G2 , BCQ), where
q is connected. The following are equivalent:
1. We semantically characterize UCQ rewritability for
queries in (G2 , CQ) in terms of a certain boundedness
property for the set of C-trees defined in Section 5.
1. Q is UCQ rewritable.
2. There exist k, m ≥ 0 (which depend only on Q) s.t.
Q(D) 6= ∅ =⇒ Q(D≤k ) 6= ∅ or Q(D>0 ) 6= ∅ ,
2. We extend the techniques developed in Section 5 and
construct in double-exponential time a 2WAPA A that
has exponentially many states, such that the aforementioned boundedness property does not hold iff L(A) is
infinite. (Such an infinity problem for tree automata
has been used to obtain the decidability of the boundedness problem for monadic Datalog [32, 56]).
for each C-tree S-database D with |dom(C)| ≤ 2 · |q|
and branching degree at most m.
The reduction to the infinity problem. We now proceed with step 2, and we explain how the boundedness property established in item (2) of Proposition 30 can be reduced
to the infinity problem for 2WAPAs. As in Section 5, we do
not reason with C-tree databases directly, but we deal with
their encodings as consistent ΓS,l -labeled trees. In fact, using the same ideas as in Lemma 22, we can show by exploiting Proposition 30 that the following are equivalent:
Our 2ExpTime upper bound then follows since the infinity
problem for a 2WAPA A, i.e., checking if L(A) is infinite,
is feasible in exponential time in the number of states, and
in polynomial time in the size of the alphabet. This follows
from two known results: (a) The 2WAPA A can be converted
into an equivalent non-deterministic tree automata B with
a single-exponential blow up in the number of states [57],
and (b) solving the infinity problem for non-deterministic
tree automata is feasible in polynomial time; cf. [56].
It is worth contrasting our proof with the one in [16] for
E LHI, which does not make use of the infinity problem for
2WAPA, but applies a different argument based on pumping. This leads to a finer complexity analysis in terms of the
size of the different components of the OMQ, but, in our
opinion, makes the proof conceptually harder.
(i) Q is UCQ rewritable.
(ii) There are k, m ≥ 0 such that
Q(JLK) 6= ∅ =⇒
Q(JLK≤k ) 6= ∅ or Q(JLK>0 ) 6= ∅ ,
for every consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree L with l = 2 · |q|
and whose branching degree is bounded by m.
Let us write Boundedness for the property expressed
in item (ii) above, which can be reduced to the problem
of checking whether some tree language is finite. Let LQ
be the set of all ΓS,l -labeled trees L of branching degree
at most m such that: (1) Q(JLK) = ∅ and (2) there is
some “extension” L′ of L, with branching degree m, such
that Q(JL′ K) 6= ∅ and Q(JL′ K>0 ) = ∅. Notice that L′ can
increase the depth but not the branching degree of L. It
is not difficult to show that Boundedness holds iff LQ is
finite. We then devise in double-exponential time a 2WAPA
CQ,l , which has exponentially many states, such that LQ =
L(CQ,l ). Therefore, the following holds:
The semantic characterization. To establish the semantic characterization from step 1, we need to define the notion of distance from the root for an element u in a C-tree
database D. Intuitively, this corresponds to the minimal
distance between a node that contains u and the root of a
tree decomposition T of D that witnesses the fact that D is
a C-tree. We do not consider all such tree decompositions,
however, but concentrate on a well-behaved subclass, which
we call the lean tree decompositions of the C-tree D; the formal definition can be found in [11], as it does not add much
to the explanation we provide here. Due to the fact that
we focus on unary and binary relations, such lean tree decompositions ensure the invariance of the notion of distance
from the root, by severely limiting the level of redundancy
allowed in a tree representation of D. Therefore, it does not
matter which lean tree decomposition we choose, since in all
of them the distance of an element u from the root will be
the same. Let D≤k be the subinstance of D induced by the
set of elements whose distance from the root is at most k,
and let D>k be the subinstance of D induced by the set of
elements whose distance from the root is at least k + 1.
Another useful notion is the branching degree of a tree
decomposition T , that is, the maximum number of child
nodes over all nodes of T . Again, lean tree decompositions
ensure the invariance of the branching degree. This allows
us to define the branching degree of a C-tree database D
as the branching degree of a lean tree decomposition that
witnesses the fact that D is a C-tree.
It follows from [16] that being able to decide containment
for the OMQ language (G2 , BCQ) (as we have done in Section 5) allows us to concentrate on connected CQs when
deciding UCQ rewritability. This simplifies technicalities
Proposition 31. Consider Q ∈ (G2 , BCQ). We can
construct in double-exponential time a 2WAPA A, which has
exponentially many states, such that
Q is UCQ rewritable ⇐⇒ L(A) is finite.
Since checking whether L(A) is infinite is feasible in exponential time in the number of states and in polynomial
time in the size of the alphabet, Proposition 31 implies that
UCQRew(G2 , CQ) is in 2ExpTime, as needed.
8. CONCLUSIONS
We have concentrated on the fundamental problem of containment for OMQ languages based on the main decidable
classes of tgds. We have also used our techniques to close
problems related to distribution over components and UCQ
rewritability. We believe that our techniques for solving containment under guarded OMQs can be extended to frontierguarded OMQs, an interesting extension of guardedness [8].
We are also convinced that our solution to the problem of
deciding UCQ rewritability of guarded OMQs over unary
and binary relations can be extended to guarded (or even
frontier-guarded) OMQs over arbitrary schemas. We are
currently investigating these challenging problems.
12
APPENDIX
PRELIMINARIES
Definition of Non-recursiveness
In the main body of the paper, we define non-recursive sets of tgds via the notion of predicate graph. Here, we give
an alternative definition, based on the well-known notion of stratification, which is more convenient for the combinatorial
analysis that we are going to perform in the proof of Proposition 14.
Definition 3. Consider a set Σ of tgds. A stratification of Σ is a partition {Σ1 , . . . , Σn }, where n > 0, of Σ such that, for
some function µ : sch(Σ) → {0, . . . , n}, the following hold:
1. For each predicate R ∈ sch(Σ), all the tgds with R in their head belong to Σµ(R) , i.e., they belong to the same set of
the partition.
2. If there exists a tgd in Σ such that the predicate R appears in its body, while the predicate P appears in its head, then
µ(R) < µ(P ).
We say that Σ is stratifiable if it admits a stratification.
It is an easy exercise to show that the predicate graph of a set Σ of tgds is acyclic iff Σ is stratifiable. Then:
Lemma 32. Σ is non-recursive iff Σ is stratifiable.
Definition of Stickiness
In the main body of the paper, we provide an intuitive explanation of stickiness. Here, we recall the formal definition of sticky
sets of tgds, introduced in [27]. Fix a set Σ of tgds; w.l.o.g., we assume that, for every pair (σ, σ ′ ) ∈ Σ × Σ, σ and σ ′ do not
share variables. For notational convenience, given an atom α and a variable x occurring in α, pos(α, x) is the set of positions
in α at which x occurs; a position P [i] identifies the i-th attribute of the predicate P . The definition of stickiness hinges on
the notion of marked variables in a set of tgds.
Definition 4. Consider a tgd σ ∈ Σ, and a variable x occurring in the body of σ. We inductively define when x is marked
in Σ as follows:
1. If there exists an atom α in the head of σ such that x does not occur in α, then x is marked in Σ; and
2. Assuming that there exists an atom α in the head of σ such that x occurs in α, if there exists σ ′ ∈ Σ (not necessarily
different than σ) and an atom β in the body of σ ′ such that (i) α and β have the same predicate and, (ii) each variable
in β that occurs at a position of pos(α, x) is marked in Σ, then x is marked in Σ.
We are now ready to recall when a set of tgds is sticky:
Definition 5. A set Σ of tgds is sticky if, for each σ ∈ Σ, and for each variable x occurring in the body of σ, the following
holds: if x is marked in Σ, then x occurs only once in the body of σ.
PROOFS OF SECTION 3
Proof of Proposition 5
Consider an OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (C, CQ), where C is a class of tgds, an S-database D, and a tuple c̄ ∈ dom(D)|x̄| . We
show that:
c̄ ∈ Q(D) ⇐⇒ (sch(Σ), ∅, qD,c̄ ) ⊆ (sch(Σ), Σ, q) .
|
{z
} |
{z
}
Q1
Q2
(⇒) Assume that Q1 6⊆ Q2 . This implies that there exists a sch(Σ)-database D′ , and a tuple t̄ of constants such that
t̄ ∈ qD,c̄ (D′ ) and t̄ 6∈ q(chase(D′ , Σ)). Due to the monotonicity of CQs, t̄ ∈ qD,c̄ (chase(D′ , Σ)). Since, by construction,
the instance chase(D′ , Σ) satisfies Σ, we conclude that qD,c̄ 6⊆Σ q.6 By exploiting the well-known characterization of CQ
containment in terms of the chase, we get that c̄ 6∈ q(chase(D, Σ)), which is equivalent to c̄ 6∈ Q(D), as needed.
(⇐) Conversely, assume that c̄ 6∈ Q(D), or, equivalently, c̄ 6∈ q(chase(D, Σ)). This implies that c̄ 6∈ Q2 (D). Observe that
c̄ ∈ qD,c̄ (D) holds trivially, which in turn implies that c̄ ∈ Q1 (D). Therefore, Q1 6⊆ Q2 , and the claim follows.
6
This is the standard notation for the fact that qD,c̄ (I) 6⊆ q(I), for every (possibly infinite) instance I that satisfies Σ.
13
Proof of Proposition 9
The construction underlying Proposition 9 relies on the idea of encoding boolean operations (in our case the ‘or’ operator)
using a set of atoms; this idea has been exploited in several other works; see, e.g., [14, 21, 41]. Let Q = (S, Σ, q) ∈ (C, UCQ).
Our goal is to construct in polynomial time Q′ = (S, Σ′ , q ′ ) ∈ (C, CQ) such that Q ≡ Q′ . We assume, w.l.o.g., that the
predicates of S do not appear in the head of a tgd of Σ; we can copy the content of a relation R/k ∈ S into an auxiliary
predicate R⋆ /k, using the tgd R(x1 , . . . , xk ) → R⋆ (x1 , . . . , xk ), while staying inside C, and then rename each predicate P in
Σ and q with P ⋆ . The set Σ′ consists of the following tgds:
1. For every R/k ∈ S:
R(x1 , . . . , xk ) → R′ (x1 , . . . , xk , 1), True(1).
These tgds are annotating the database atoms with the truth constant true, indicating that these are true atoms.
2. Assuming that q = ∃ȳ φ(x̄, ȳ), a tgd:
True(t) → ∃x̄∃ȳ∃f φ′∧ (x̄, ȳ, f ), ψ(t, f ),
where φ′∧ is the conjunction of atoms in φ, after replacing each atom R(v1 , . . . , vk ) with R′ (v1 , . . . , vk , f ), and ψ is the
conjunction of atoms
Or(t, t, t), Or(t, f, t), Or(f, t, t), Or(f, f, f ).
This tgd generates a “copy” of the atoms in q, while annotating them with a null value that represents the truth constant
false, indicating that are not necessarily true atoms. Moreover, the truth table of ‘or’ is generated.
3. Finally, for each tgd φ(x̄, ȳ) → ∃z̄ ψ(x̄, x̄) in Σ, a tgd
φ′ (x̄, ȳ, w) → ∃z̄ ψ ′ (x̄, z̄, w),
where φ′ and ψ ′ are obtained from φ and ψ, respectively, by replacing each atom R(v1 , . . . , vk ) with R′ (v1 , . . . , vk , w). In
fact, this is the actual set of tgds Σ, with the difference that the value at the last position of each atom (which indicates
whether it is true or false) is propagated to the inferred atoms.
Now, assuming that q = q1 ∨ · · · ∨ qn , the CQ q ′ is defined as follows; let x̄ = x1 . . . xn and ȳ = y1 . . . yn+1 :
^
(qi′ [xi ] ∧ Or(yi , xi , yi+1 )) ∧ True(yn+1 )),
∃x̄∃ȳ (False(y1 ) ∧
1≤i≤n
where x̄ and ȳ are fresh variables not in q, and qi′ [xi ] is obtained from qi by replacing each atom R(v1 , . . . , vk ) with
R′ (v1 , . . . , vk , xi ). This completes our construction.
It is not difficult to show that Q ≡ Q′ , or, equivalently, for every S-database D, q(chase(D, Σ)) = q ′ (chase(D, Σ′ )). The
key observation is that in order to satisfy True(yn+1 ) in the CQ q ′ , at least one of the x̄i ’s must be mapped to 1, which means
that at least one qi is satisfied by chase(D, Σ). Finally, it is easy to verify that, for each C ∈ {G, L, NR, S}, Σ ∈ C implies
Σ′ ∈ C, and Proposition 9 follows.
PROOFS OF SECTION 4
Proof of Proposition 10
W
′
′
We assume that q(x̄) = n
i=1 qi (x̄) is a UCQ rewriting of Q. Since, by hypothesis, Q 6⊆ Q , we conclude that q 6⊆ Q , which
′
in turn implies that there exists i ∈ {1, . . . , n} such that qi 6⊆ Q . Let c(x̄) be a tuple of constants obtained by replacing each
variable x in x̄ with the constant c(x), and Dqi the S-database obtained from qi after replacing each variable x in qi with the
constant c(x). We show that:
Lemma 33. c(x̄) 6∈ Q′ (Dqi ).
Proof. Since qi 6⊆ Q′ , there exists an S-database D, and a tuple of constants t̄ such that t̄ ∈ qi (D) and t̄ 6∈ Q′ (D). Clearly,
there exists a homomorphism h such that h(qi ) ⊆ D and h(x̄) = t̄. Observe also that ρ(Dqi ) ⊆ D, where ρ = h ◦ c−1 .
Towards a contradiction, assume that c(x̄) ∈ Q′ (Dqi ). This implies that there exists a homomorphism γ such that γ(q ′ ) ⊆
chase(Dqi , Σ) and γ(ȳ) = c(x̄), where Q′ = (S, Σ, q ′ (ȳ)). It is not difficult to see that there exists an extension ρ′ of ρ such
that ρ′ (chase(Dqi , Σ)) ⊆ chase(D, Σ) and ρ′ (x̄) = t̄. Hence, ρ′ (γ(q ′ )) ⊆ chase(D, Σ), which implies that t̄ ∈ q ′ (chase(D, Σ));
thus, t̄ ∈ Q′ (D). But this contradicts the fact that t̄ 6∈ Q′ (D), and the claim follows.
Observe that c(x̄) ∈ q(Dqi ), which immediately implies that c(x̄) ∈ Q(Dqi ). Consequently, by Lemma 33, Q(Dqi ) 6⊆ Q′ (Dqi ).
The claim follows since, by construction, Dqi is an S-database such that |Dqi | ≤ fO (Q).
14
Algorithm 1: The algorithm XRewrite
Input: An OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q(x̄)) ∈ (TGD, CQ)
Output: A UCQ q ′ (x̄) such that Q(D) = q ′ (D), for every S-database D
i := 0;
Qrew := {hq, r, ui};
repeat
Qtemp := Qrew ;
foreach hq, x, ui ∈ Qtemp , where x ∈ {r, f} do
foreach σ ∈ Σ do
/* rewriting step
foreach S ⊆ body (q) such that σ is applicable to S do
i := i + 1;
q ′ := γS,σ i (q[S/body (σi )]);
if there is no (q ′′ , r, ⋆) ∈ Qrew such that q ′ ≃ q ′′ then
Qrew := Qrew ∪ {hq ′ , r, ui};
end
end
/* factorization step
foreach S ⊆ body (q) that is factorizable w.r.t. σ do
q ′ := γS (q);
if there is no (q ′′ , ⋆, ⋆) ∈ Qrew such that q ′ ≃ q ′′ then
Qrew := Qrew ∪ {hq ′ , f, ui};
end
end
end
/* query q is now explored
Qrew := (Qrew \ {(q, x, u)}) ∪ {(q, x, e)};
end
until Qtemp = Qrew ;
Qfin := {q | hq, r, ei ∈ Qrew , and q contains only predicates of S};
return Qfin
*/
*/
*/
The Algorithm XRewrite
In view of the fact that the rewriting algorithm XRewrite is heavily used in our complexity analysis, we would like to recall its
definition. This algorithm is based on resolution, and thus, before we proceed further, we need to recall the crucial notion of
unification. A set of atoms A = {α1 , . . . , αn }, where n > 2, unifies if there exists a substitution γ, called unifier for A, such
that γ(α1 ) = · · · = γ(αn ). A most general unifier (MGU) for A is a unifier for A, denoted as γA , such that for each other
unifier γ for A, there exists a substitution γ ′ such that γ = γ ′ ◦ γA . Notice that if a set of atoms unify, then there exists a
MGU. Furthermore, the MGU for a set of atoms is unique (modulo variable renaming).
The algorihtm proceeds by exhaustively applying two steps: rewriting and factorization, which in turn rely on the technical
notions of applicability and factorizability, respectively. We assume, w.l.o.g., that tgds and CQs do not share variables. Given
a CQ q, a variable x is called shared in q if x is a free variable of q, or it occurs more than once in q. In what follows, we
assume, w.l.o.g., that tgds are in normal form, i.e., they have only one atom in the head, and only one occurrence of an
existentially quantified variable [27]. We write π∃ (σ) for the position at which the existentially quantified variable of σ occurs;
in case σ does not mention an existentially quantified variable, then π∃ (σ) = ε. (Recall that a position P [i] identifies the i-th
attribute of a predicate P .) We are now ready to recall applicability and factorizability; in what follows, we write body (q) for
the set of atoms occurring in q, and head (σ) for the head-atom of σ.
Definition 6. (Applicability) Consider a CQ q and a tgd σ. Given a set of atoms S ⊆ body(q), we say that σ is applicable
to S if the following conditions are satisfied:
1. the set S ∪ {head (σ)} unifies, and
2. for each α ∈ S, if the term at position π in α is either a constant or a shared variable in q, then π 6= π∃ (σ).
Roughly, whenever σ is applicable to S, this means that the atoms of S may be generated during the chase procedure by
applying σ. Therefore, we are allowed to apply a rewriting step (which is essentially a resolution step) that resolves S using
σ, i.e., S is replaced by body(σ), and a new CQ that is closer to the input database is obtained.
If we start applying rewriting steps blindly, without checking for applicability, then the soundness of the rewriting procedure
is not guaranteed. However, it is possible that the applicability condition is not satisfied, but still we should apply a rewriting
step. This may happen due to the presence of redundant atoms in a query. For example, given the CQ
q = ∃x∃y∃z (R(x, y) ∧ R(x, z))
and the tgd
σ = P (u, v) → ∃w R(w, u)
15
the applicability condition fails since the shared variable x in q occurs at the position π∃ (σ) = R[1]. However, q is essentially
the CQ q = ∃x∃y R(x, y), and now the applicability condition is satisfied. From the above informal discussion, we conclude
that the applicability condition may prevent the algorithm from being complete since some valid rewriting steps are blocked.
Because of this reason, we need the so-called factorization step, which aims at converting some shared variables into nonshared variables, and thus, satisfy the applicability condition. In general, this can be achieved by exhaustively unifying all
the atoms that unify in the body of a CQ. However, some of these unifications do not contribute in any way to satisfying the
applicability condition, and, as a result, many superfluous CQs are generated. It is thus better to apply a restricted form of
factorization that generates a possibly small number of CQs that are vital for the completeness of the rewriting algorithm.
This corresponds to the identification of all the atoms in the query whose shared existential variables come from the same
atom in the chase, and they can be unified with no loss of information. Summing up, the key idea underlying the notion of
factorizability is as follows: in order to apply the factorization step, there must exist a tgd that can be applied to its output.7
Definition 7. (Factorizability) Consider a CQ q and a tgd σ. Given a set of atoms S ⊆ body (q), where |S| > 2, we say that
S is factorizable w.r.t. σ if the following conditions are satisfied:
1. S unifies,
2. π∃ (σ) 6= ε, and
3. there exists a variable x 6∈ var (body (q) \ S) that occurs in every atom of S only at position π∃ (σ).
Having the above key notions in place, we are now ready to recall the algorithm XRewrite, which is depicted in Algorithm 1.
As said above, the UCQ rewriting of an OMQ q = (S, Σ, q) is computed by exhaustively applying (i.e., until a fixpoint is
reached) the rewriting and the factorization steps. Notice that the CQs that are the result of the factorization step, are
nothing else than auxiliary queries which are critical for the completeness of the final rewriting, but are not needed in the
final rewriting. Thus, during the iterative procedure, the queries are labeled with r (resp., f) in order to keep track which of
them are generated by the rewriting (resp., factorization) step. The CQ that is part of the input OMQ, although is not a
result of the rewriting step, is labeled by r since it must be part of the final rewriting. Moreover, once the two crucial steps
have been exhaustively applied on a CQ q, it is not necessary to revisit q since this will lead to redundant queries. Hence,
the queries are also labeled with e (resp., u) indicating that a query has been already explored (resp., is unexplored). Let us
now describe the two main steps of the algorithm. In the sequel, consider a triple (q, x, y), where (x, y) ∈ {r, f} × {e, u} (this
is how we indicate that q is labeled by x and y), and a tgd σ ∈ Σ. We assume that q is of the form ∃x̄ ϕ(x̄, ȳ).
Rewriting Step. For each S ⊆ body (q) such that σ is applicable to S, the i-th application of the rewriting step generates
the query q ′ = γS,σ i (q[S/body (σ i )]), where σ i is the tgd obtained from σ by replacing each variable x with xi , γS,σ i
is the MGU for the set S ∪ {head (σ i )} (which is the identity on the variables that appear in the body but not in the
head of σ i ), and q[S/body (σ i )] is obtained from q be replacing S with body (σ i ). By considering σ i (instead of σ) we
basically rename, using the integer i, the variables of σ. This renaming step is needed in order to avoid undesirable
clutters among the variables introduced during different applications of the rewriting step. Finally, if there is no
(q ′′ , r, ⋆) ∈ Qrew , i.e., an (explored or unexplored) query that is the result of the rewriting step, such that q ′ and q ′′ are
the same (modulo bijective variable renaming), denoted q ′ ≃ q ′′ , then (q ′ , r, u) is added to Qrew .
Factorization Step. For each S ⊆ body (q) that is factorizable w.r.t. σ, the factorization step generates the query q ′ = γS (q),
where γS is the MGU for S. If there is no (q ′′ , ⋆, ⋆) ∈ Qrew , i.e., a query that is the result of the rewriting or the
factorization step, and is explored or unexplored, such that q ′ ≃ q ′′ , then (q ′ , f, u) is added to Qrew .
Proof of Proposition 14
We assume, w.l.o.g., that the predicates of S do not appear in the head of a tgd of Σ. Since Σ ∈ NR, by Lemma 32, Σ admits
a stratification {Σ1 , . . . , Σn } with stratification function µ : sch(Σ) → {0, . . . , n}. Let us briefly explain how the rewriting
tree TQ of the OMQ Q = (S, Σ, q) is defined. TQ is a rooted tree with q being its root. The i-th level of TQ consists of the
CQs obtained from the CQs of the (i − 1)-th level by applying rewriting steps (see the algorithm XRewrite for details on the
rewriting step) using only tgds from Σn−i+1 . It is easy to verify that the CQs of the i-th level contain only predicates P such
that µ(P ) < n − i + 1. It is now clear that the n-th level of TQ (i.e., the leaves of TQ ) consists only of CQs obtained during the
execution of XRewrite(Q) that contain only predicates of S. Thus, in order to obtained the desired upper bound, it suffices
to show that the number of atoms that occur in a CQ that is a leaf of TQ is at most |q| · (maxτ ∈Σ {|body (τ )|})|sch(Σ)| . To this
end, let us focus on one branch B of TQ from the root q to a leaf q ′ . Such a branch can be naturally represented as a k-ary
forest FQB , where the root nodes are the atoms of q, and whenever an atom α is resolved during the rewriting step using a
tgd τ , the atoms of body (τ ), after applying the appropriate MGU, are the child nodes of α. Therefore, to obtain the desired
upper bound, it suffices to show that the number of leaves of FQB is at most |q| · (maxτ ∈Σ {|body (τ )|})|sch(Σ)| . By construction,
FQB consists, in general, of |q| k-ary rooted trees, where k = maxτ ∈Σ {|body (τ )|}, of depth n. Hence, the number of leaves of
FQB is at most |q| · (maxτ ∈Σ {|body (τ )|})n . Since n ≤ |sch(Σ)|, the claim follows.
7
Let us clarify that for the purposes of the present work we can rely on the naive approach of exhaustively unifying all the
atoms that unify in the body of a CQ. However, we would like to be consistent with [40], where the algorithm XRewrite is
proposed, and thus, we stick on the slightly more involved notion of factorizability.
16
Proof of Theorem 16
A proof sketch for the coNExpTimeNP upper bound is given in the main body of the paper. We proceed to establish the
PNEXP -hardness. Our proof is by reduction from a tiling problem that has been recently introduced in [34], which in turn
relies on the standard Exponential Tiling Problem. Let us first recall the latter problem.
An instance of the Exponential Tiling Problem is a tuple (n, m, H, V, s), where n, m are numbers (in unary), H, V are
subsets of {1, . . . , m} × {1, . . . , m}, and s is a sequence of numbers of {1, . . . , m}. Such a tuple specifies that we desire a
2n × 2n grid, where each cell is tiled with a tile from {1, . . . , m}. H (resp., V ) is the horizontal (resp., vertical) compatibility
relation, while s represents a constraint on the initial part of the first row of the grid. A solution to such an instance of the
Exponential Tiling Problem is a function f : {0, . . . , 2n − 1} × {0, . . . , 2n − 1} → {1, . . . , m} such that:
1. f (i, 0) = s[i], for each 0 ≤ i ≤ (|s| − 1);
2. (f (i, j), f (i + 1, j)) ∈ H, for each 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n − 2 and 0 ≤ j ≤ 2n − 1; and
3. (f (i, j), f (i, j + 1)) ∈ V , for each 0 ≤ i ≤ 2n − 1 and 0 ≤ j ≤ 2n − 2.
We will refer to {0, . . . , 2n − 1} × {0, . . . , 2n − 1} as a grid, with the pairs in it being cells. A cell consists of two coordinates, the
column-coordinate (for short col-coordinate) and the row-coordinate, and any function on a grid is a tiling. The Exponential
Tiling Problem is defined as follows: given an instance T as above, decide whether T has a solution. It is known that this
problem is NExpTime-hard (see, e.g., Section 3.2 of [46]).
We are now ready to recall the tiling problem introduced in [34], called Extended Tiling Problem (ETP), which is PNEXP hard. An instance of this problem is a tuple (k, n, m, H1 , V1 , H2 , V2 ), where k, n, m are numbers (in unary), and H1 , V1 , H2 , V2
are subsets of {1, . . . , m} × {1, . . . , m}. The question is as follows: is it the case that for every sequence s, where |s| = k, of
numbers of {1, . . . , m}, (n, m, H1 , V1 , s) has no solution or (n, m, H2 , V2 , s) has a solution?
We give a reduction from the ETP to Cont(NR, CQ). More precisely, given an instance T = (k, n, m, H1 , V1 , H2 , V2 ) of the
ETP, our goal is to construct in polynomial time two queries Qi = (S, Σi , qi ) ∈ (NR, CQ), for i ∈ {1, 2}, such that T has a
solution iff Q1 ⊆ Q2 .
Data Schema S
The data schema S consists of:
• 0-ary predicates Cij , for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and j ∈ {1, . . . , m}; the atom Cij indicates that si = j.
The Query Q1
The goal of the query Q1 is twofold: (i) to check that the so-called existence property of the input database, i.e., for every
i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, there exists at least one atom of the form Cij , is satisfied, and (ii) to check whether (n, m, H1 , V1 , s), where
s is the sequence of tilings encoded in the input database, has a solution. To this end, the query Q1 will mention the following
predicates:
• 0-ary predicate Ci , indicating that there exists at least one atom of the form Cij in the input database.
• 0-ary predicate Existence, indicating that the input database enjoys the existence property.
• Unary predicate Tilei , for each i ∈ {1, . . . , m}; the atom Tilei (x) states that x is the tile i.
• Binary predicate H; the atom H(x, y) encodes the fact that (x, y) ∈ H1 .
• Binary predicate V ; the atom V (x, y) encodes the fact that (x, y) ∈ V1 .
• 5-ary predicate Ti , for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n}; the atom Ti (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ) states that x is a 2i × 2i tiling obtained from
the 2i−1 × 2i−1 tilings x1 , . . . , x4 – details on the inductive construction of 2i × 2i tilings from 2i−1 × 2i−1 tilings are
given below.
• Unary predicate Initiali , for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; the atom Initiali (x) states that s[i] = x, i.e., the i-th element of the
sequence s is x.
• Binary predicate Topji , for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n} and j ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; the atom Topji (x, y) states that in the 2i × 2i tiling
x the tile at position (j, 0) is y.
• 0-ary predicate Tiling, indicating that there exists a 2n × 2n tiling that is compatible with the initial tiling s encoded
in the input database.
• 0-ary predicate Goal, which is derived whenever the predicates Existence and Tiling are derived.
Q1 is defined as the query (S, Σ1 , Goal), where Σ1 consists of the following tgds:
17
X1
X2
X2
Y1
Y1
Y2
X3
X4
X4
Y3
Y3
Y4
X3
X4
X4
Y3
Y3
Y4
Z1
Z2
Z2
W1
W1
W2
X1
X2
Y1
Y2
X3
X4
Y3
Y4
Z1
Z2
W1
W2
Z1
Z2
Z2
W1
W1
W2
Z3
Z4
W3
W4
Z3
Z4
Z4
W3
W3
W4
(a)
(b)
Figure 2: Inductive construction of tilings.
• Checking for the existence property of the input database
For each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and j ∈ {1, . . . , m}:
Cij
→
Ci
and the tgd that checks for the existence property
C0 , . . . , Ck−1
→
Existence
• Generate the tiles
→ ∃x1 . . . ∃xm (Tile1 (x1 ), . . . , Tilem (xm ))
• Generate the compatibility relations
For each (i, j) ∈ H1 :
Tilei (x), Tilej (y) →
H(x, y)
Tilei (x), Tilej (y) →
V (x, y)
For each (i, j) ∈ V1 :
• Generate the 2n × 2n tilings. The key idea is to inductively construct 2i × 2i tilings from 2i−1 × 2i−1 tilings. It is easy
to verify that the grid in Figure 2(a) is a 2i × 2i tiling iff the nine subgrids of it, shown in Figure 2(b), are 2i−1 × 2i−1
tilings. This has been already observed in [33], where Datalog with complex values is studied.
First, we construct tilings of size 2 × 2 (the base case of the inductive construction):
H(x1 , x2 ), H(x3 , x4 ), V (x1 , x3 ), V (x2 , x4 )
→ ∃x T1 (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 )
Then, we inductively construct tilings of larger size until we get tilings of size 2n × 2n . This is done using the following
tgds. For each i ∈ {2, . . . , n}:
Ti−1 (x1 , x11 , x12 , x21 , x22 ), Ti−1 (x2 , x12 , x13 , x22 , x23 ), Ti−1 (x3 , x13 , x14 , x23 , x24 )
Ti−1 (x4 , x21 , x22 , x31 , x32 ), Ti−1 (x5 , x22 , x23 , x32 , x33 ), Ti−1 (x6 , x23 , x24 , x33 , x34 ),
Ti−1 (x7 , x31 , x32 , x41 , x42 ), Ti−1 (x8 , x32 , x33 , x42 , x43 ), Ti−1 (x9 , x33 , x34 , x43 , x44 ) →
∃x Ti (x, x1 , x3 , x7 , x9 )
• Extract from the 2n × 2n tilings the tiles at positions (0, 0), (1, 0), . . . , (k − 1, 0). This is done using the following tgds:
→
Top01 (x, x1 ), Top11 (x, x2 )
→
→
..
.
ℓ−1
Tℓ (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ), Top0ℓ−1 (x1 , y0 ), · · · , Top2ℓ−1 −1 (x1 , y2ℓ−1 −1 ) →
Top02 (x, y0 ), Top12 (x, y1 )
Top22 (x, y0 ), Top32 (x, y1 )
T1 (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 )
T2 (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ), Top01 (x1 , y0 ), Top11 (x1 , y1 )
T2 (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ), Top01 (x2 , y0 ), Top11 (x2 , y1 )
Tℓ (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ), Top0ℓ−1 (x1 , y0 ), · · ·
k−2ℓ−1 −1
, Topℓ−1
(x1 , yk−2ℓ−1 −1 )
→
ℓ−1
Top0ℓ (x, y0 ), · · · , Topℓ2
ℓ−1
Top2ℓ (x, y0 ), · · ·
−1
(x, y2ℓ−1 −1 )
, Topk−1
(x, yk−2ℓ−1 −1 ),
ℓ
where ℓ = ⌈log k⌉. Moreover, for each i ∈ {ℓ + 1, . . . , n}:
Ti (x, x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 ), Top0i−1 (x1 , y0 ), · · · , Topk−1
i−1 (x1 , yk−1 ) →
18
Top0i (x, y0 ), . . . , Topk−1
(x, yk−1 )
i
• Check whether there exists a 2n × 2n tiling that is compatible with the sequence of tilings s
For each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and j ∈ {1, . . . , m}:
Cij , Tilej (x) → Initiali (x)
and the tgd
Top0n (x, y0 ), Initial0 (y0 ), · · · , Topk−1
(x, yk−1 ), Initialk−1 (yk−1 ) →
n
Tiling
• Finally, we have the output tgd
Existence, Tiling
→ Goal
This concludes the construction of Q1 .
The Query Q2
The goal of the query Q2 is twofold: (i) to check that the so-called uniqueness property of the input database, i.e., for every
i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, there exists at most one atom of the form Cij , is satisfied, and (ii) to check whether (n, m, H2 , V2 , s), where
s is the sequence of tilings encoded in the input database, has a solution. The query Q2 mentions the same predicates as Q1 ,
and is defined as (S, Σ2 , Goal), where Σ2 consists of the following tgds:
• Checking the uniqueness property
For each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} and j, ℓ ∈ {1, . . . , m} with j < ℓ:
Cij , Ciℓ
→ Goal
• The rest of Σ2 encodes the tiling problem (n, m, H2 , V2 , s) in exactly the same way as Σ1 encodes (n, m, H1 , V1 , s).
This concludes the construction of Q2 .
Proof of Proposition 18
The set Σn consists of the following tgds; for brevity, we write x̄ji for xi , xi+1 , . . . , xj :8
S(x1 , . . . , xn )
n
i−1
n
Pi (x̄i−1
1 , z, x̄i+1 , z, o), Pi (x̄1 , o, x̄i+1 , z, o)
P0 (z, . . . , z , z, o)
| {z }
→ Pn (x1 , . . . , xn )
n
→ Pi−1 (x̄i−1
1 , z, x̄i+1 , z, o),
1 ≤ i ≤ n,
→ Ans(z, o),
n
while q = Ans(0, 1). It can be verified that, for every {S}-database D, Qn (D) 6= ∅ implies that
D ⊇ {S(c1 , . . . , cn−2 , 0, 1) | (c1 , . . . , cn−2 ) ∈ {0, 1}n−2 },
and thus, |D| ≥ 2n−2 . Let Q = ({S}, Σ′ , q ′ ), where Σ′ is a set of tgds and q ′ a Boolean CQ, and D an {S}-database. Clearly,
Qn (D) 6⊆ Q(D) iff Qn (D) 6= ∅ and Q(D) = ∅. This implies that |D| ≥ 2n−2 , and the claim follows.
Proof of Theorem 19
The coNExpTime upper bound, as well as the ΠP
2 -hardness in case of fixed-arity predicates, are discussed in the main body
of the paper. Here, we show the coNExpTime-hardness. The proof proceeds in two steps:
1. First, we show that Cont((FNR, CQ), (L, UCQ)) is coNExpTime-hard, where FNR denotes the class of full non-recursive
sets of tgds, i.e., non-recursive sets of tgds without existentially quantified variables.
2. Then, we reduce Cont((FNR, CQ), (L, UCQ)) to Cont((S, CQ), (L, UCQ)) by showing that (under some assumptions that
are explained below) every query in (FNR, CQ) can be rewritten as an (S, CQ) query.
By Proposition 9, we immediately get that Cont((S, CQ), (L, CQ)) is coNExpTime-hard, as needed.
Step 1:
Cont((FNR, CQ), (L, UCQ))
is coNExpTime-hard
We show that Cont((FNR, CQ), (L, UCQ)) is coNExpTime-hard, even if we focus on 0-1 queries, that is, queries Q with
following property: for every database D, Q(D) = Q(D01 ), where D01 ⊆ D is the restriction of D on the binary domain
{0, 1}, i.e., D01 = {R(c̄) ∈ D | c̄ ⊆ {0, 1}}. The proof is by reduction from the Exponential Tiling Problem, and is a non-trivial
adaptation of the one given in [14] for showing that containment of non-recursive Datalog queries is coNExpTime-hard.
Theorem 34. Cont((FNR, CQ), (L, UCQ)) is coNExpTime-hard, even for 0-1 queries.
Proof. Given an instance T = (n, m, H, V, s) of the Exponential Tiling Problem, we are going to construct a (FNR, CQ)
0-1 query QT = (S, Σ, q) and a (L, UCQ) 0-1 query Q′T = (S, ΣT , qT ) such that T has a solution iff QT 6⊆ Q′T .
8
A similar construction has been used in [40] for showing a lower bound on the size of a CQ in the UCQ rewriting of a (S, CQ)
OMQ.
19
Data Schema S
The data schema S consists of:
• 2n-ary predicates TiledBy i , for each i ≤ m; the atom TiledBy i (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ) indicates that the cell with
coordinates ((x1 , . . . , xn ), (y1 , . . . , yn )) ∈ {0, 1}n × {0, 1}n is tiled by tile i. Notice that we use n-bit binary numbers to
represent a coordinate; this is the key difference between our construction and the one of [14].
The Query QT
The goal of the query QT is to assert whether the input database encodes a candidate tiling, i.e., whether the entire grid is
tiled, without taking into account the constraints, that is, the compatibility relations and the constraint on the initial part of
the first row. To this end, the query QT will mention the following predicates:
• Unary predicate Bit; the atom Bit(x) simply says that x is a bit, i.e., x ∈ {0, 1}.
• 2n-ary predicate TiledAboveColi , for each i ≤ n; the atom TiledAboveColi (x̄, ȳ) says that for the row-coordinate ȳ
there are tiled cells with coordinates (x̄′ , ȳ) for every col-coordinate x̄′ that agrees with x̄ on the first i − 1 bits. In
other words, for the row corresponding to ȳ, every column extending the first i − 1 bits of x̄ is tiled. In particular,
TiledAboveCol1 (x̄, ȳ) says that the entire row ȳ is tiled.
• 2n-ary predicate TiledAboveRowi , for each i ≤ n; the atom TiledAboveRowi (ȳ) says that for every ȳ ′ that agrees with
ȳ on the first i − 1 bits, the row ȳ ′ is fully tiled.
• n-ary predicate RowTiled; the atom RowTiled(ȳ) says that the row ȳ is fully tiled.
• 0-ary predicate AllTiled, which asserts that the entire grid is tiled.
• 0-ary predicate Goal, which is derived whenever the predicate AllTiled is derived.
QT is defined as the query (S, Σ, Goal), where Σ consists of the following rules:
• Generate Bit atoms
→ Bit(0)
→ Bit(1).
• RowTiled
For each j, k ≤ m:
TiledBy j (x1 , . . . , xn−1 , 1, y1 , . . . , yn ), TiledBy k (x1 , . . . , xn−1 , 0, y1 , . . . , yn ),
Bit(x1 ), . . . , Bit(xn−1 ), Bit(y1 ), . . . , Bit(yn ), Bit(w) →
TiledAboveColn (x1 , . . . , xn−1 , w, y1 , . . . , yn )
For each 2 ≤ i ≤ n:
TiledAboveColi (x1 , . . . , xi−1 , 1, xi+1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ),
TiledAboveColi (x1 , . . . , xi−1 , 0, x′i+1 , . . . , x′n , y1 , . . . , yn ),
Bit(wi ), . . . , Bit(wn ) →
TiledAboveColi−1 (x1 , . . . , xi−1 , wi , . . . , wn , y1 , . . . , yn )
A row is fully tiled:
TiledAboveCol1 (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ) →
RowTiled(y1 , . . . , yn )
• AllTiled
RowTiled(y1 , . . . , yn−1 , 1), RowTiled(y1 , . . . , yn−1 , 0), Bit(w)
→ TiledAboveRown (y1 , . . . , yn−1 , w)
For each 2 ≤ i ≤ n:
TiledAboveRowi (y1 , . . . , yi−1 , 1, yi+1 , . . . , yn ),
′
TiledAboveRowi (y1 , . . . , yi−1 , 0, yi+1
, . . . , yn′ ),
Bit(wi ), . . . , Bit(wn ) →
TiledAboveRowi−1 (y1 , . . . , yi−1 , wi , . . . , wn )
The entire grid is tiled:
TiledAboveRow1 (y1 , . . . , yn ) →
AllTiled →
20
AllTiled
Goal
This concludes the construction of the query QT .
The Query Q′T
Q′T is defined in such a way that Q′T (D) is non-empty exactly when the input database D encodes an invalid tiling, i.e., when
one of the constraints on the tiles is violated. The query Q′T will mention the following intensional predicates:
• Unary predicate Bit; as above, Bit(x) says that x is a bit.
• 2i-ary predicate LastFirsti , for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n; the atom LastFirsti (x1 , . . . , xi , y1 , . . . , yi ) says that (x1 , . . . , xi ) =
(1, . . . , 1) and (y1 , . . . , yi ) = (0, . . . , 0).
• 2i-ary predicate Succi , for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n; the atom Succi (x̄, ȳ) says that the i-bit binary number ȳ is the successor of
the i-bit binary number x̄.
• 0-ary predicate Goal.
Q′T is defined as the query (S, Σ′ , q ′ ). The set Σ′ consists of the following linear tgds:
• Generate Bit atoms:
→ Bit(0)
→ Bit(1).
• Generate the successor predicates:
→
→
Succ1 (0, 1)
LastFirst1 (1, 0).
For each 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1:
Succi (x1 , . . . , xi , y1 , . . . , yi )
Succi (x1 , . . . , xi , y1 , . . . , yi )
LastFirsti (x1 , . . . , xi , y1 , . . . , yi )
LastFirsti (x1 , . . . , xi , y1 , . . . , yi )
→ Succi+1 (0, x1 , . . . , xi , 0, y1 , . . . , yi )
→ Succi+1 (1, x1 , . . . , xi , 1, y1 , . . . , yi )
→ Succi+1 (0, x1 , . . . , xi , 1, y1 , . . . , yi )
→ LastFirsti+1 (1, x1 , . . . , xi , 0, y1 , . . . , yi ).
The UCQ q ′ consists of the following (Boolean) CQs; for brevity, the existential quantifiers in front of the CQs are omitted:
• Tile Consistency
For each i 6= j ≤ m:
TiledBy i (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ), TiledBy j (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ),
Bit(x1 ), . . . , Bit(xn ), Bit(y1 ), . . . , Bit(yn )
• Tile Compatibility
For each (i, j) 6∈ V :
Succn (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ),
TiledBy i (w1 , . . . , wn , x1 , . . . , xn ), TiledBy i (w1 , . . . , wn , y1 , . . . , yn ),
Bit(w1 ), . . . , Bit(wn )
For each (i, j) 6∈ H:
Succn (x1 , . . . , xn , y1 , . . . , yn ),
TiledBy i (x1 , . . . , xn , w1 , . . . , wn ), TiledBy i (y1 , . . . , yn , w1 , . . . , wn ),
Bit(w1 ), . . . , Bit(wn )
• Tiling of First Row
For each j ≤ n, let fj be the function from {1, . . . , n} into {0, 1} such that fj (1) . . . fj (n) is the number j in binary
representation, and let k ∈ {1, . . . , m} other than s[j]; recall that s is a sequence of numbers of {1, . . . , m} that represents
a constraint on the initial part of the first row of the grid. Then, we have the CQ:
TiledBy k (x1 , . . . , xn , z, . . . , z ), Succ1 (z, o)
| {z }
n
where, for each i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, xi = z if fj (i) = 0, and xi = o if fj (i) = 1.
This concludes the definition of the query Q′T .
21
Step 2:
Cont((S, CQ), (L, UCQ))
is coNExpTime-hard
Our goal is show that every 0-1 query (S, Σ, q) ∈ (F, CQ) can be equivalently rewritten as a 0-1 query (S, Σ′ , q ′ ), where all
the tgds of Σ′ are lossless, i.e., all the body-variables appear also in the head, which in turn implies that Σ′ is sticky.
Proposition 35. Consider a 0-1 query Q ∈ (F, CQ). We can construct in polynomial time a 0-1 query Q′ ∈ (S, CQ) such
that Q ≡ Q′ .
Proof. Let Q = (S, Σ, q), and assume that n is the maximum number of variables occurring in the body of a tgd of Σ.
We are going to construct in polynomial time a 0-1 query Q′ = (S, Σ′ , q ′ ) ∈ (S, CQ) such that Q ≡ Q′ .
The set Σ′ consists of the following tgds:
• Initialization Rules
We first transform every database atom of the form R(c̄) into an atom R′ (c̄, 0, . . . , 0, 0, 1). This is done as follows:
| {z }
n
→ Bit(0)
→ Bit(1)
and, for each k-ary predicate R ∈ S, we have the lossless tgd
R′ (x1 , . . . , xk , 0, . . . , 0)
| {z }
R(x1 , . . . , xk ), Bit(x1 ), . . . , Bit(xk ) →
n
Notice that we can safely force the variables x1 , . . . , xk to take only values from {0, 1} due to the 0-1 property.
• Transformation into Lossless Tgds
For each tgd σ ∈ Σ of the form
R1 (x̄1 ), . . . , Rk (x̄k )
→ R0 (x̄0 )
we have the lossless tgd
R1′ (x̄1 , 0, . . . , 0), . . . , Rk′ (x̄k , 0, . . . , 0)
| {z }
| {z }
n
→ R0′ (x̄0 , y1 , . . . , yn ),
n
where, if {v1 , . . . , vℓ }, for ℓ ∈ {1, . . . , n}, is the set of variables occurring in the body of σ (the order is not relevant),
then yi = vi , for each i ∈ {1, . . . , ℓ}, and yj = v1 , for each j ∈ {ℓ + 1, . . . , n}.
• Finalization Rules
Observe that each atom obtained during the chase due to one of the lossless tgds introduced above is of the form R′ (x̄, ȳ),
where ȳ ∈ {0, 1}n . If ȳ 6= (0, . . . , 0), then we need to ensure that eventually the atom
R′ (x̄, 0, . . . , 0)
| {z }
n
′
will be inferred. This is achieved by adding to Σ the following tgds: For each k-ary predicate R occurring in Σ, and for
each 1 ≤ i ≤ n, we have the rule:
R′ (x1 , . . . , xk , y1 , . . . , yi−1 , 1, yi+1 , . . . , yn )
→ R′ (x1 , . . . , xk , y1 , . . . , yi−1 , 0, yi+1 , . . . , yn ).
This concludes the definition of Σ′ .
The CQ q ′ is defined analogously. More precisely, assuming that q is of the form (the existential quantifiers are omitted)
R1 (x̄1 ), . . . , Rk (x̄k )
′
the CQ q is defined as
R1′ (x̄1 , 0, . . . , 0), . . . , Rk′ (x̄k , 0, . . . , 0).
| {z }
| {z }
n
n
It is easy to verify that Σ′ consists of lossless tgds, and thus, Q′ ∈ (S, CQ). It also not difficult to see that, for every
database D over S, Q(D01 ) = Q′ (D01 ); thus, by the 0-1 property, Q(D) = Q′ (D), and the claim follows.
By Theorem 34 and Proposition 35, we immediately get that Cont((S, CQ), (L, UCQ)) is coNExpTime-hard, as needed.
22
PROOFS OF SECTION 5
Recall that, for the sake of technical clarity, we focus on constant-free tgds and CQs, but all the results can be extended to the
general case at the price of more involved definitions and proofs. Moreover, we assume that tgds have only one atom in the
head. This does not affect the generality of our proof since every set of guarded tgds can be transformed in polynomial time
into a set of guarded tgds with the above property; see, e.g., [24]. Finally, for convenience of presentation, we also assume
that the body of a tgd is non-empty, i.e., the body of a tgd is always an atom and not the symbol ⊤.
Proof of Proposition 21
Let us start by recalling the key notion of tree decomposition. Notice that the definition of the tree decomposition that we give
here is slightly different than the one in the main body of the paper. The reason is because, for convenience of presentation,
we prefer to employ a slightly different notation.
Definition 8. Let I be an instance. A tree decomposition of I that omits V , where V ⊆ dom(I), is a pair δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ),
where T = (T, E T ) is a tree and (Xt )t∈T a family of subsets of dom(I) (called the bags of the decomposition) such that:
1. For every v ∈ dom(I) \ V , the set {t ∈ T | v ∈ Xt } is non-empty and connected.
2. For every atom P (s1 , . . . , sn ) ∈ I, there is a t ∈ T such that {s1 , . . . , sn } ⊆ Xt .
The width of a tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) omitting V is max{|Xt | : t ∈ T } − 1. The tree-width of I is the
minimum among the widths of all tree decompositions of I that omit V . We call a tree decomposition omitting ∅ simply tree
decomposition of I. For v ∈ T , we denote by Iδ (v) the subinstance of I induced by Xv .
Notation. We usually denote the strict partial order among the nodes of a tree T of a tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T )
by ≺. Accordingly, we write v w iff v ≺ w or v = w. For brevity, ε will usually denote the root of a tree decomposition
at hand. If ambiguities could possibly arise, we shall use subscripts in these notations. Furthermore, when δ is clear from
context, we shall omit it from the expression Iδ (v).
Let δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) be a tree decomposition of I and V ⊆ T . Recall that δ is [V ]-guarded (or guarded except for V ), if for
every node v ∈ T \ V , there is an atom P (s1 , . . . , sn ) ∈ I such that Xv ⊆ {s1 , . . . , sn }. A [∅]-guarded tree decomposition of
I is simply called guarded tree decomposition.
Also recall the crucial notion of C-tree:
Definition 9. An S-instance I is a C-tree, where C ⊆ I, if there is a tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) of I such that
1. Iδ (ε) = C, i.e., the subinstance of I induced by Xε equals C.
2. δ is guarded except for {ε}.
If δ or C is clear from context, we shall often refer to |dom(C)| as the diameter of D and to C as the core of D.
Remark. The notion of C-tree defined here refers to both instances and databases, i.e., a C-tree may be a (finite) database
or an instance. We often do not explicitly mention whether a C-tree at hand is a database or an instance. However, it will
be clear from context whether a C-tree is a database or an instance.
We proceed to establish the following technical lemma, which in turn allows us to show Proposition 21. It is an adaption of
a result in [7] to the case of guarded tgds. Henceforth, for brevity, given a query Q = (S, Σ, q) ∈ (G, BCQ) and an S-database
D, we write D |= Q for the fact that Q(D) 6= ∅.
Lemma 36. Let Q = (S, Σ, q) be an OMQ from (G, BCQ). Let D be an S-database and suppose D |= Q. Then there is a
finite S-instance Iˆ such that Iˆ |= Q and:
1. Iˆ is a C-tree such that |dom(C)| ≤ ar (S ∪ sch(Σ)) · |q|.
2. There is a homomorphism from Iˆ to D.
Before we proceed with its formal proof, let us explain why Proposition 21 is an easy consequence of Lemma 36. The
fact that the first item implies the second is trivial. Conversely, suppose that Q1 6⊆ Q2 , which implies that there exists an
ˆ where |dom(C)| ≤ ar (S ∪ sch(Σ1 )) · |q1 |,
S-database D such that D |= Q1 and D 6|= Q2 . By Lemma 36, there exists a C-tree I,
such that Iˆ |= Q1 . Moreover, there is a homomorphism from Iˆ to D; hence, since Q2 is closed under homomorphisms, it
immediately follows that Iˆ 6|= Q2 . Consequently, the S-database D̂ obtained from Iˆ after replacing each null z with a distinct
constant cz is a C-tree such that Q1 (D̂) 6⊆ Q2 (D̂), and Proposition 21 follows.
We now proceed with the proof of Lemma 36 which is our main task in this section. Before that, we introduce some
additional auxiliary concepts.
23
The Guarded Chase Forest
Given a database D and a set Σ of guarded tgds, the guarded chase forest for D and Σ is a forest (whose edges and nodes
are labeled) constructed as follows:
1. For each fact R(ā) in D, add a node labeled with R(ā).
2. For each node v labeled with α ∈ chase(D, Σ) and for every atom β resulting from a one-step application of a rule τ ∈ Σ,
if α is the image of the guard in this application of τ , then add a node w labeled with β and introduce an arc from v to
w labeled with τ .
We can assume that the guarded chase forest is always built inductively according to a fixed, deterministic version of
the chase procedure. The non-root nodes are then totally ordered by a relation ≺ that reflects their order of generation.
Furthermore, we can extend ≺ to database atoms by picking a lexicographic order among them. Notice that one atom can
be the label of multiple nodes. Using the order ≺ we can, however, always refer to the ≺-least node.
Guarded Unraveling
Let I be an instance over S. We say that X ⊆ dom(I) is guarded in I, if there are a1 , . . . , as ∈ dom(I) such that
• X ⊆ {a1 , . . . , as } and
• there is an R/s ∈ S such that I |= R(a1 , . . . , as ).
A tuple t̄ is guarded in I if the set containing the elements of t̄ is guarded in I.
In the following paragraph, we largely follow the notions introduced in [2, 13]. Fix an S-instance I and some X0 ⊆ dom(I).
Let Π be the set of finite sequences of the form X0 X1 · · · Xn , where, for i > 0, Xi is a guarded set in I, and, for i ≥ 0,
Xi+1 = Xi ∪ {a} for some a ∈ dom(I) \ Xi , or Xi ⊇ Xi+1 . The sequences from Π can be arranged in a tree by their natural
prefix order and each sequence π = X0 X1 · · · Xn identifies a unique node in this tree. In this context, we say that a ∈ dom(I)
is represented at π whenever a ∈ Xn . Two sequences π, π ′ are a-equivalent, if a is represented at each node on the unique
shortest path between π and π ′ . For a represented at π, we denote by [π]a the a-equivalence class of π. The guarded unraveling
around X0 is the instance I ∗ over the elements {[π]a | a is represented at π}, where
I ∗ |= R([π1 ]a1 , . . . , [πn ]an ) ⇐⇒df I |= R(a1 , . . . , an ) and
∃π ∈ Π, ∀i ∈ {1, . . . , n} : [π]ai = [πi ]ai ,
for all R/n ∈ S.
Lemma 37. For every S-instance I and any X0 ⊆ dom(I), the guarded unraveling I ∗ around X0 is a C-tree over S, where
C is the subinstance of I ∗ induced by the elements {[X0 ]a | a ∈ X0 }.
Proof. Let δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ), where T is the natural tree that arises from ordering the sequences in Π by their prefixes.
For π ∈ T , let Xπ := {[π]a | a is represented at π}. Let ε denote the root of T . We need to show that δ is an appropriate tree
decomposition witnessing that I ∗ is a C-tree. First, note that it is clear that I(ε) = {[X0 ]a | a ∈ X0 } by construction. Let
[π]a ∈ dom(I) and consider the set A := {t ∈ T | [π]a ∈ Xt }. This set is certainly non-empty. Moreover, for t1 , t2 ∈ A, we know
that [t1 ]a = [t2 ]a , hence t1 and t2 are a-connected in T . Suppose I ∗ |= R([π1 ]a1 , . . . , [πn ]an ) for some R/n ∈ S. Then there is a
π ∈ T such that [π]ai = [πi ]ai , for all i = 1, . . . , n. Hence, a1 , . . . , an are all represented at π and so {[π1 ]a1 , . . . , [πn ]an } ⊆ Xπ .
It remains to show that δ is guarded except for {ε}. Let π 6= ε and consider the set Xt . Since π is a sequence of length greater
than one, its last element Y is a guarded set in I. Hence, there are a1 , . . . , as such that Y ⊆ {a1 , . . . , as } and I |= R(a1 , . . . , as )
for some R/s ∈ S. Let {a1 , . . . , as } \ Y = {b1 , . . . , bm } and define ρ := π · (Y ∪ {b1 }) · (Y ∪ {b1 , b2 }) · · · (Y ∪ {b1 , . . . , bm }).
Then I ∗ |= R([ρ]a1 , . . . , [ρ]as ), as desired.
Notice that this lemma implies that the tree-width of I ∗ is bounded by |X0 | + ar (S) − 1.
We are now ready to prove Lemma 36:
Proof of Lemma 36. Let q = ∃ȳ ϕ(ȳ) and µ a homomorphism mapping ϕ(ȳ) to chase(D, Σ). Let R1 (b̄1 ), . . . , Rk (b̄k )
exhaust all facts from D that are the roots of those ≺-least
S facts from µ(ϕ(ȳ)) in the guarded chase forest of D and Σ that
have an element from dom(D) as argument. Let Gµ := 1≤i≤k {b̄i } and let I ∗ be the unraveling of D around Gµ , regarding
all elements from dom(I ∗ ) as labeled nulls. Henceforth, for every a ∈ Gµ , we denote by λa the element [Gµ ]a . We say that
λa represents a. Let C be the substructure of I ∗ induced by the set {λa | a ∈ Gµ }. Notice that I ∗ is an infinite instance that
is a C-tree by Lemma 37. We will show later how to get a finite instance from I ∗ that satisfies our constraints. We proceed
to show that I ∗ ∪ Σ logically entails q, denoted I ∗ , Σ |= q:
Lemma 38. I ∗ , Σ |= q.
Proof. We will first construct a universal model J of I ∗ and Σ. Recall that an instance U is a universal model of I
and Σ, if it can be homomorphically mapped to every model of I ∪ Σ; in particular, it is well-known and easy to prove that
chase(I, Σ) is always a universal model of I and Σ. Before constructing J, we introduce some additional notions. In the
following, given a guarded set G = {a1 , . . . , ak } in D, a copy of G in I ∗ is a set Γ = {α1 , . . . , αk } which is guarded in I ∗ such
24
that, for i = 1, . . . , k, we have that αi = [πi ]ai for some sequences πi and D |= R(ai1 , . . . , aim ) iff I ∗ |= R(αi1 , . . . , αim ) for
all R ∈ S and ij ∈ {1, . . . , k}. Copies of guarded tuples are defined accordingly. Consider the structure chase(D, Σ). Let
G be a guarded set in D and D ↾ G denote the subinstance of D induced by G. It is well-known and easy to prove that
chase(D ↾ G, Σ) is acyclic (cf., e.g., [23]). Henceforth, we loosely call chase(D ↾ G, Σ) the tree attached to G. The model
J is constructed as follows. Let J0 be the instance C. Furthermore, for each guarded set G = {a1 , . . . , ak } in D and each
copy Γ = {α1 , . . . , αk } of G in I ∗ , construct a new instance JΓ that is isomorphic to the tree attached to G such that (i) the
elements ai of G are renamed to αi in JΓ , (ii) dom(J0 ) ∩ dom(JΓ ) = {α1 , . . . , αk }, and (iii) Γ ∩ Θ = dom(JΓ ) ∩ dom(JΘ ),
for every copy Θ of G in I ∗ . The model J is the union of J0 and all the JΓ . If a guarded set X in JΓ arises from renaming
elements of a guarded set Y in chase(D ↾ G, Σ), we also say that X is a copy of Y in J. Furthermore, the copies of D that
are contained in I ∗ (i.e., in J0 ) are also called copies in J. Observe that J is a model of I ∗ by construction. We show that it
is a model of Σ. To this end, we show the following claim.
Claim 39. Let t̄ be a guarded tuple in J and let q(x̄) be a guarded conjunctive query9 over S ∪ sch(Σ). Suppose t̄ is a copy
of s̄ in J, where s̄ is over dom(chase(D, Σ)) and |t̄| = |s̄|. Then J |= q(t̄) iff chase(D, Σ) |= q(s̄).
Proof. Suppose J |= q(t̄). Let {t̄} = {α1 , . . . , αk } be a copy of {s̄} = {a1 , . . . , ak } in J. Since q(x̄) is guarded, there is a
Γ ⊇ ({α1 , . . . , αk } ∩ dom(J0 )) such that JΓ |= q(t̄). Let G ⊇ {s̄} be the guarded set in D of which Γ is a copy in J0 . It clearly
holds that chase(D ↾ G, Σ) |= q(s̄), whence chase(D, Σ) |= q(s̄) follows.
Suppose that chase(D, Σ) |= q(s̄). Let t̄ = α1 , . . . , αk and s̄ = a1 , . . . , ak and suppose that αi = [πi ]ai (i = 1, . . . , k).
The set {a1 , . . . , ak } is guarded in chase(D, Σ). Hence, there is a guarded G ⊇ {a1 , . . . , ak } ∩ dom(D) in D such that
chase(D ↾ G, Σ) |= q(s̄). We show that there is a Γ ⊇ {α1 , . . . , αk } ∩ dom(I ∗ ) which is a copy of G in I ∗ . Suppose
G = {b1 , . . . , bl }. Let π = X0 X1 · · · Xm be such that [π]ai = [πi ]ai for all i = 1, . . . , k. For i = 1, . . . , l, define
ρi := π · (Xm ∪ {b1 }) · (Xm ∪ {b1 , b2 }) · · · (Xm ∪ {b1 , . . . , bi }).
Then bi is represented at ρi . For i = 1, . . . , l, let βi := [ρi ]bi . We claim that Γ := {β1 , . . . , βl } is a copy of G in I ∗ .
Let R/s ∈ S and suppose I ∗ |= R([ρi1 ]bi1 , . . . , [ρis ]bis ). Then we immediately obtain D |= R(bi1 , . . . , bis ). Conversely, if
D |= R(bi1 , . . . , bis ), let ρ := ρℓ , where ℓ := max{i1 , . . . , is }. Take any j ∈ {i1 , . . . , is }. It is easy to see that ρ and ρj are
bj -equivalent. Hence, [ρj ]bj = [ρ]bj and it follows that I ∗ |= R([ρi1 ]bi1 , . . . , [ρis ]bis ), as required. It follows that Γ is a copy
of G in I ∗ and so there is a structure JΓ contained in J that is isomorphic to chase(D ↾ G, Σ) with b1 , . . . , bl respectively
renamed to β1 , . . . , βl . Hence, J |= q(t̄) as required.
Now let σ : ϕ(x̄, ȳ) → ∃z̄ α(x̄, z̄) be a guarded rule from Σ. Suppose that J |= ∃ȳ ϕ(t̄, ȳ). Since every guarded tuple in J is
a copy of some guarded tuple in chase(D, Σ), there is an s̄, of which t̄ is a copy, such that chase(D, Σ) |= ∃ȳ ϕ(s̄, ȳ). Since
chase(D, Σ) is a model of Σ, we know that chase(D, Σ) |= ∃z̄ α(s̄, z̄). It follows that J |= ∃z̄ α(s̄, z̄) by the above claim, as
required. It remains to show that J is universal:
Claim 40. J is universal.
Proof. It suffices to show that J can be homomorphically mapped to chase(I ∗ , Σ) via a homomorphism η. We let η0
be the homomorphism that maps every element of J0 to itself. It remains to treat the structures JΓ . Consider a copy
Γ = {α1 , . . . , αk } in I ∗ of a set G = {b1 , . . . , bk } which is guarded in D. It suffices to show that JΓ can be mapped to
chase(I ∗ , Σ). To this end, it we show how to map chase(D ↾ G, Σ) to chase(I ∗ , Σ). We do so by induction on the number of
0
rule applications of chase(D ↾ G, Σ). For the base case, we map D ↾ G to I ∗ as follows. Let ηG
(bi ) := αi , for i = 1, . . . , k.
Suppose D ↾ G |= R(bi1 , . . . , bil ) for some R ∈ S and ij ∈ {1, . . . , k}, where j = 1, . . . , l. Recall that Γ is guarded in I ∗ .
0
is indeed a homomorphism
Reviewing the construction of I ∗ , it is easy to see that this holds iff I ∗ |= R(αi1 , . . . , αil ). Hence, ηG
i
from D ↾ G to I ∗ . The induction step is obvious—we can easily obtain a homomorphism ηG
that maps chase k (D ↾ G, Σ) to
i
chase(I ∗ , Σ). The desired homomorphism ηG is the union of the ηG
(i ≥ 0). We then obtain a homomorphism ηΓ from ηG by
appropriately renaming the elements from the domain of the latter as we did in the construction of JΓ —which is nothing else
than an isomorphic copy of chase(D ↾ G, Σ). Furthermore, each of these homomorphisms maps each element of Γ to itself.
The desired homomorphism η that witnesses that J is universal is the union of η0 and the ηΓ .
In order to prove I ∗ , Σ |= q, it remains to show that there is a homomorphism
µ̂ that maps q to J. There are guarded
S
sets G1 , . . . , Gl in D such that µ can be understood to map q to chase( 1≤i≤l (D ↾ Gi ), Σ). By construction, we know
S
thatS G1 , . . . , Gl can be chosen in such a way that Gµ ⊆ li=1 Gi . Since Σ is guarded, µ can be understood to map q
to 1≤i≤l chase(D ↾ Gi , Σ)—assuming that the labeled nulls occurring in these instances are mutually new. Let Cµ :=
{{b̄1 }, . . . , {b̄k }}. For every X ∈ Cµ , let ΓX := {λb | b ∈ X}. Notice that ΓX is a copy of X in I ∗ . By construction, all
the facts from q that
S are mapped via µ to chase(D, Σ) and which have an element from dom(D) in their image under µ are
already mapped to X∈Cµ chase(D ↾ X, Σ). For the other facts, the names of the constants in the databases do not matter.10
Let Θ1 , . . . , Θs be arbitrary copies of the sets {G1 , . . . , Gl } \ Cµ in I ∗ . It follows that we can find our desired match µ̂ in the
9
By a guarded conjunctive query we mean here a CQ that contains an atom that contains all the variables occurring in the
CQ as argument.
10
Here, it is of course essential to assume constant-free rules.
25
S
S
S
S
union of X∈Cµ JΓX and 1≤i≤s JΘi . Notice that X∈Cµ JΓX is isomorphic to X∈Cµ chase(D ↾ X, Σ) with each b ∈ Gµ
represented by λb .
Now the database I ∗ has the desired form with C being its core. However, I ∗ is infinite. Since I ∗ , Σ |= q due to Lemma 38,
by compactness, there is a finite B̂ ⊆ I ∗ such that B̂, Σ |= q. Consider a tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) witnessing that
I ∗ is a C-tree. There is a maximum ℓ such that B̂ contains all the subinstances induced by the bags of depth less or equal
ℓ. Let Iˆ be the instance that actually contains all the subinstances induced by the bags of level up to ℓ. Hence, Iˆ is itself a
ˆ Σ |= q, since B̂ ⊆ I.
ˆ
C-tree and I,
Now there is a natural homomorphism mapping Iˆ to D: we simply specify [π]a 7→ a for all a ∈ dom(D). The instance Iˆ is
the one we are looking for.
Proof of Lemma 22
One can naturally encode instances of bounded tree-width into trees over a finite alphabet such that the alphabet’s size
depends only on the tree-width. Our goal here is to appropriately encode C-trees in order to make them accessible to tree
automata techniques. Since the tree-width of a C-tree over S depends only on the size of dom(C) and the maximum arity of
S, the alphabet of the encoding will depend on the same.
Labeled trees. Let Γ be an alphabet and (N \ {0})∗ be the set of finite sequences of positive integers, including the empty
sequence ε.11 Let us recall that a Γ-labeled tree is a pair t = (T, µ), where µ : T → Γ is the labeling function and T ⊆ (N \ {0})∗
is closed under prefixes, i.e., x · i ∈ T implies x ∈ T , for all x ∈ (N ∪ {0})∗ and i ∈ (N ∪ {0}). The elements contained in T
identify the nodes of t. For i ∈ N \ {0}, nodes of the form x · i ∈ T are the children of x. A path of length n in T from x to
y is a sequence of nodes x = x1 , . . . , xn = y such that xi+1 is a child of xi . A branch is a path from the root to a leaf node.
For x ∈ T , we set x · i · −1 := x, for all i ∈ N, and x · 0 := x—notice that ε · −1 is not defined.
Encoding. Let l ≥ 0 and fix a schema S. Let US,l be the disjoint union of two sets Cl and TS , respectively containing l
and 2 · ar (S) elements. The elements from US,l will be called names. Elements from the set Cl will describe core elements,
while those of TS will describe the others. Furthermore, neighboring nodes may describe overlapping pieces of the instance.
In particular, if one name is used in neighboring nodes, this means that the name at hand refers to the same element—this
is why we use 2w elements for the non-root bags. Let KS,l be the finite schema capturing the following information:
• For all a ∈ US,l , there is a unary relation Da ∈ KS,l .
• For all a ∈ Cl , there is a unary relation Ca ∈ KS,l .
n
• For each R ∈ S and every n-tuple ā ∈ US,l
, there is a unary relation Rā ∈ KS,l .
Let ΓS,l := 2KS,l be an alphabet and suppose that D is a (finite) C-tree over S such that |dom(C)| ≤ l. Consider a
tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) witnessing that D is indeed a C-tree and let ε be the root of T . Fix a function
f : dom(D) → US,l such that (i) f ↾ dom(C) is injective and (ii) different elements that occur in neighboring bags of δ are
always assigned different names from US,l . Using f , we can encode D and δ into a ΓS,l -labeled tree t = (T̂ , µ) such that each
node from T corresponds to exactly one node in T̂ and vice versa. For a node v from T , we denote the corresponding node
of T by v̂ in the following and vice versa. In this light, the symbols from KS,l have the following intended meaning:
• Da ∈ µ(v̂) means that a is used as a name for some element of the bag Xv .
• Ca ∈ µ(v̂) indicates that a is used as name for an element of the bag Xv that also occurs in Xε , i.e., a names an element
from the core of D.
• Rā ∈ µ(v̂) indicates that R holds in D for the elements named by ā in bag Xv .
Under certain assumptions, we can decode a ΓS,l -labeled tree t = (T, µ) into a C-tree whose width is bounded by ar (S) − 1.
Let names(v) := {a | Da ∈ µ(v)}. We say that t is consistent, if it satisfies the following properties:
1. For all nodes v it holds that |names(v)| ≤ ar (S), except for the root whose number of names are accordingly bounded
by l. Furthermore, names(ε) ⊆ Cl .
2. For all Rā ∈ KS,l and all v ∈ T it holds that Rā ∈ µ(v) implies that {ā} ⊆ names(v).
3. For all a ∈ Cl and all v ∈ T it holds that Da ∈ µ(v) iff Ca ∈ µ(v).
4. If Ca ∈ µ(v), then Ca ∈ µ(w) for all w ∈ T on the unique shortest path between v and the root.
5. For all nodes v 6= ε, there is an Rā ∈ KS,l and a node w such that Rā ∈ µ(w), names(v) ⊆ {ā}, and, for all b ∈ names(v),
v and w are b-connected.
11
We specify that 0 is included in N as well.
26
Decoding trees. Suppose now that t is consistent. We show how we can decode t into a database JtK which is a C-tree
whose diameter is bounded by l. Let a be a name used in t. We say that two nodes v, w of t are a-equivalent if Da ∈ µ(u) for
all nodes u on the unique shortest path between v and w. Clearly, a-equivalence defines an equivalence relation and we let
[v]a := {(w, a) | w is a-equivalent to v} and [v]∗a := {w | (w, a) ∈ [v]a }. The domain of JtK is the set {[v]a | v ∈ T, a ∈ µ(v)}
and, for R/n ∈ S, we define
JtK |= R([v1 ]a1 , . . . , [vn ]an ) ⇐⇒df there is some v ∈ [v1 ]∗a1 ∩ · · · ∩ [vn ]∗an such that Ra1 ,...,an ∈ µ(v).
Lemma 41. Let t be a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree with root node ε. Then JtK is well-defined and a C-tree over S, where C
is the subinstance of JtK induced by the set {[ε]a | a ∈ names(ε)}. Moreover, |dom(C)| is bounded by l.
Proof. Let t = (T, µ) be a consistent, ΓS,l -labeled tree. The fact that JtK is well-defined is left to the reader. We are going
to construct an appropriate decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) for JtK. The tree T has the same structure as t. Furthermore, for
v ∈ T , we set Xv := {[v]a | a ∈ names(v)}. We need to show that δ is indeed a tree decomposition that satisfies the desired
properties.
Let [v]a ∈ dom(JtK) and consider two nodes v1 , v2 ∈ T such that [v]a ∈ Xv1 and [v]a ∈ Xv2 . Then v1 , v2 ∈ [v]a and
so v1 and v2 are a-connected. Hence, w ∈ [v]a for all w ∈ T which lie on the unique shortest path between v1 and v2 .
Since a ∈ names(w) for all such w, it follows that [v]a ∈ Xw , and so [v]a is contained in all bags on the unique path
between v1 and v2 . Suppose JtK |= R([v1 ]a1 , . . . , [vn ]an ). Then there is a v ∈ [v1 ]∗a1 ∩ · · · ∩ [vn ]∗an such that Ra1 ,...,an ∈
µ(v). By consistency, {a1 , . . . , an } ⊆ names(v). Moreover, we know that [vi ]ai = [v]ai , for i = 1, . . . , n. It follows that
{[v1 ]a1 , . . . , [vn ]an } ⊆ Xv . Now let v ∈ T \ {ε}. By consistency, there is an Ra1 ,...,an ∈ KS,l and a w ∈ T such that
names(v) := {ai1 , . . . , ais } ⊆ {a1 , . . . , an } ⊆ names(w), Ra1 ,...,an ∈ µ(w), and v and w are bij -connected for j = 1, . . . , s.
By construction, Xv = {[v]ai1 , . . . , [v]ais } and {[w]a1 , . . . , [w]an } ⊆ Xw . The claim follows now since [v]aij = [w]aij for
j = 1, . . . , s. It is immediate that |dom(C)| is bounded by l.
Notation. Given a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree t = (T, µ) and a label ρ ∈ µ(T ), in order to ease notation we often regard ρ
as a database consisting of the facts {R(ā) | Rā ∈ ρ}. Furthermore, we let names(ρ) := {a | Da ∈ ρ}.
Proof of Lemma 22. The lemma is an easy consequence of Lemma 41 and the fact that, when encoding a C-tree D over
S, together with a tree decomposition witnessing that D is a C-tree, into a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree t, then JtK and D are
isomorphic.
Roughly, Lemma 22 states that containment among OMQs from (G, BCQ) can be semantically characterized via the
decodings of consistent ΓS,l -labeled trees. This makes the problem of deciding containment amenable to tree automata
techniques.
Proof of Lemma 23
Before proceeding to the proof of Lemma 23, we first introduce the relevant automata model.
Automata Techniques
For a set of propositional variables X, we denote by B+ (X) the set of Boolean formulas using variables from X, the connectives
∧, ∨, and the constants true, false. Let us now introduce our automata model.
Definition 10. A two-way alternating parity automaton (2WAPA) on trees is a tuple A = (S, Γ, δ, s0 , Ω), where S is a
finite set of states, Γ an alphabet (the input alphabet of A), δ : S × Γ → B+ (tran(A)) the transition function, where we set
tran(A) := {hαis, [α]s | s ∈ S, α ∈ {−1, 0, ∗}}, s0 ∈ S the initial state, and Ω : S → N the parity condition that assigns to each
s ∈ S a priority Ω(s). Elements from tran(A) are called transitions.
Intuitively, a transition of the form h0is means that a copy of the automaton should change to state s and stay at the
current node. A transition of the form h−1is means that a copy should be sent to the parent node, which is then required to
exist, and proceed in state s, while one of the form h∗is means that a copy of the automaton that assumes state s is sent to
some child node. The transition [0]s means the same as h0is, while [−1]s means that a copy of the automaton that assumes
state s should be sent to the parent node which is there not required to exist at all. Likewise, [∗]s means that a copy of the
automaton assuming state s should be sent to all child nodes.
W
V
Notation. We write ✸s for {hαis | hαis ∈ tran(A), s ∈ S}, ✷s for {[α]s | [α]s ∈ tran(A), s ∈ S}, and simply s for h0is.
Furthermore, for α ∈ N ∪ {−1, ∗}, we define
if α = −1 and x · α ∈ T ,
{x · α},
Tα (x) := {x · i | x · i ∈ T, i ∈ N \ {0}}, if α = ∗,
∅,
otherwise.
27
Definition 11. A run of a 2WAPA A = (S, Γ, δ, s0 , Ω) on a Γ-labeled tree (T, η) is a T × S-labeled tree (Tr , ηr ) such that
the following holds:
1. ηr (ε) = (ε, s0 ),
2. if y ∈ Tr , ηr (y) = (x, s), and δ(s, η(x)) = ϕ, then there is an I ⊆ tran(A) such that I |= ϕ holds and the following
conditions are satisfied:
• If hαis′ ∈ I then there is a node x′ ∈ Tα (x) and a child node y ′ ∈ Tr of y such that ηr (y ′ ) = (x′ , s′ ).
• If [α]s′ ∈ I then for all x′ ∈ Tα (x), there is a child node y ′ ∈ Tr of y such that ηr (y ′ ) = (x′ , s′ ).
We say that a run (Tr , ηr ) is accepting on A, if on all infinite paths (ε, s0 ), (x1 , s1 ), (x2 , s2 ), . . . in Tr , the maximum priority
among Ω(s0 ), Ω(s1 ), Ω(s2 ), . . . that appears infinitely often is even. A accepts a Γ-labeled tree (T, η), if there is an accepting
run on (T, η). We denote by L(A) the set of Γ-labeled trees A accepts, i.e., the language accepted by A.
Remark. The automaton model defined above resembles that in [58]. However, we explicitly provide transitions that allow
the automaton move to the parent node, while the model defined in [58] provides transitions for moving to some neighboring
node, including the parent node. Therefore, the automata in [58] offer transitions of the form s, ✸s, and ✷s with their
intended meaning as defined above. Using techniques as employed in [57, 58], for a 2WAPA A, one can show that the problem
of deciding whether L(A) = ∅ is feasible in exponential time with respect to the number of states of A and in polynomial
time with respect to the size of the input alphabet of A.
Proof of Lemma 23. We only give an intuitive explanation for the construction of the desired 2WAPA. To check
whether a ΓS,l -labeled tree is consistent, we can check each condition for consistency separately by a dedicated 2WAPA
and then take the intersection of all of them. Most of the consistency conditions are easy to check. We give here a more
detailed verbal explanation for condition (5). A 2WAPA checking this condition can be constructed as follows. At the
beginning of its run, the automaton branches universally to all nodes (except the root) in a state whose intended purpose
is to find appropriate guards in the input tree for the names available at the current node. To this end, the automaton
has to do a reachability analysis on the input tree and store, using exponentially many states in ar (S), the tuple it
seeks to guard. By a guard for the node v here, we mean a node w with an Rā ∈ µ(w) such that (i) {ā} contains all
the names present at w and (ii) is b-connected to v for all b ∈ names(v). Notice that such a reachability analysis can
be easily performed once we have the means to store the information contained in names(v) in a single state. This is,
however, possible since for this task we need somewhat O((ar (S)+l)ar (S) ) states, i.e., polynomially many in the size of ΓS,l .
Proof of Lemma 24
We first need to introduce some additional auxiliary notions.
Strictly Acyclic Queries
Let q be a CQ over a schema S. We denote by free(q) the free variables of q; the same notation is used for first-order formulas
in general. We can naturally view q as an instance [q] whose domain is the set of variables of q and contains the body atoms
of q as facts. In the following, we will often overload notation and write q for both the query q and the instance [q]. The
notions of tree-width, acyclicity, etc. then immediately extend to CQs. Given a tree decomposition δ of q (i.e., of [q]), we say
that δ is strict, if some bag of δ contains all variables that are free in q (cf. also [38]). Accordingly, q is called strictly acyclic
if it has a guarded tree decomposition that is strict.
Strictly acyclic queries have the convenient property to be equivalent to guarded formulas of a special form. Recall that
the set of guarded formulas over a schema S is built inductively by including all atomic formulas, relativizing quantifiers by
atomic formulas, and closing under Boolean connectives. More precisely, all quantifier occurrences have one of the forms
∀ȳ (α(x̄, ȳ) → ϕ)
and
∃ȳ (α(x̄, ȳ) ∧ ϕ),
such that the free variables of ϕ are among {x̄, ȳ}.
We are interested in the guarded formulas that are build up using conjunction and existential quantification; we restrict
ourselves to such formulas in the following. We call a formula from this class strictly guarded, if it is of the form ∃ȳ (α(x̄, ȳ)∧ϕ).
We explicitly include the case where ȳ is the empty sequence of variables, i.e., if to formulas of the form α(x̄) ∧ ϕ with
free(ϕ) ⊆ {x̄}. Notice that every guarded sentence ϕ (i.e., a formula having no free variables) is strictly guarded, since it is
equivalent to ∃y (y = y ∧ ϕ). Furthermore, notice that every usual guarded formula that uses only existential quantifiers and
conjunction is equivalent to a conjunction of strictly guarded formulas. The following lemma is proved in [38].
Lemma 42. Every strictly acyclic CQ can be rewritten in polynomial time into an equivalent strictly guarded formula that
is built up using conjunction and existential quantification only. The converse holds as well.
Squid Decompositions
Let q be a BCQ over a schema S having n body atoms. An S-cover of q is a BCQ q + that contains all the atoms from q and
may additionally contain 2n other body atoms over S. It is pretty straightforward that, for an S-instance I, it holds that
I |= q iff there is an S-cover q + of q such that I |= q + .
28
Definition 12. Let I be an instance. For V ⊆ dom(I), we say that I is [V ]-acyclic, if it has a guarded tree decomposition
that omits V .
Definition 13. Let q be a BCQ over S. A squid decomposition of q is a tuple δ = (q + , µ, H, T, V ), where q + is an S-cover
of q, µ : var (q + ) → var (q + ) a mapping, V ⊆ var (µ(q + )), and (H, T ) a partition of the atoms µ(q + ) such that
• H is the set of atoms of µ(q + ) induced by V ,
• T = µ(q + ) \ H and T is [V ]-acyclic.
Intuitively, a squid decomposition specifies a way how a BCQ can be mapped to an instance that contains some “cyclic
parts”—the set H specifies those atoms that are mapped to such cyclic parts, while A declares those atoms that are mapped
to the acyclic parts of the instance at hand. We will make this more precise in Lemma 43 below, where we analyze matches
in C-trees.
Given a CQ q and a set of variables V ⊆ var (q), the V -reduct of q, denoted q V , is the conjunctive query that arises from q
by dropping all the existential quantifiers that bind variables in V .
Lemma 43. Let J be a C-tree over S and q a BCQ over S. Let (T , (Xt )t∈T ) be a witnessing tree decomposition of J. It
holds that J |= q iff there is a squid decomposition δ = (q + , µ, H, A, V := {x̄}) of q and a homomorphism η : µ(q + ) → J such
that
1. C |= H is witnessed by η,
S
2. ε≺v J(v) |= AV (η(x̄)) is witnessed by η, and
3. there are strictly guarded formulas ϕ1 , . . . , ϕl such that AV (x̄) ≡ ϕ1 ∧ · · · ∧ ϕl .
Proof. For the direction from right to left, consider such a given squid decomposition δ and a homomorphism η as in the
hypothesis of the lemma. It is immediate that η ◦ µ is a homomorphism mapping q + to J. Since q + is an S-cover of q, we
obtain J |= q as required.
For the other direction, suppose that J |= q is witnessed by a homomorphism θ. For each v ∈ T \ {ε}, let βv be an atom
of J such that J(v) |= βv and βv contains all domain elements from J(v) as arguments. Notice that the βv exist, since δ is
guarded except for {ε}. Since θ maps q to J, for each atom α of q, there is a node vα such that θ(α) ∈ J(vα ). Let W be
the set of all these nodes and their closure under greatest lower bounds with respect to , excluding the root node ε of T .
Consider the set of atoms Q+ := θ(q) ∪ {βv | v ∈ W }. Notice that at least half of the nodes of W are of the form vα —hence,
|Q+ | ≤ 3|q|. Let q + be a BCQ constructed as follows. Take the conjunction of q and for each βv (a1 , . . . , an ) (v ∈ W ), add
an atom βv (x1 , . . . , xn ), where each xi is a newly chosen variable. Then q + is obviously an S-cover of q. Furthermore, by
construction, there is a mapping µ : var (q + ) → var (q + ) and an isomorphism η : µ(q + ) → Q+ such that (η ◦ µ)(q + ) = Q+ .
Now let H be the greatest set of atoms of µ(q + ) such that η(H) ⊆ J(ε). Moreover, let V := var (H) and A := µ(q + ) \ H.
We claim that δ := (q + , µ, H, A, V ) is a squid decomposition of q that satisfies together with η the points mentioned in the
statement of the lemma.
To see that δ is a squid decomposition of q, the only nontrivial point to prove is that A is indeed [V ]-acyclic. We will prove
this below in the course of establishing the third item.
The first two items are immediate by construction. We proveS
the third item. Suppose V = {x̄} and consider the V -reduct
AV (x̄) of A. By construction, the atoms η(A) are contained in ε≺v J(v). Now the set W together with the order T gives
rise to a forest consisting of trees T1 , . . . , Tl whose roots are descendants of ε, i.e., the root of T (recall that ε is not contained
S
S
S
in W ). Moreover, we have (i) li=1 Ti = W , (ii) Ti ∩ Tj = ∅, for i 6= j, and (iii) v∈Ti Xv ∩ v∈Tj Xv ⊆ dom(C), for i 6= j.
S
For v ∈ T , let Q+ (v) := {α ∈ Q+ | J(v) |= α} and, for i = 1, . . . , l, let Q+ (Ti ) be the set of atoms v∈Ti Q+ (v). Now it is
easy to check using the facts stated before that each Q+ (Ti ) is acyclic and, hence, so is η −1 (Q+ (Ti )). Furthermore, denoting
by εi the root of Ti , it holds that dom(Q+ (Ti )) ∩ η(V ) ⊆ dom(Q+ (εi ))—indeed, if a ∈ dom(Q+ (v)) ∩ η(V ) for some v εi ,
then, since εi ≻ ε and a ∈ Xε , it must be the case that a ∈ dom(Q+ (εi )) by connectivity. It follows that the V -reduct of
η −1 (Q+ (Ti )) (viewed as Boolean query), henceforth denoted qT+i , is strictly acyclic and is therefore equivalent to a strictly
V
guarded formula ϕi . Hence, the query AV (x̄) is equivalent to li=1 ϕi . Moreover, it follows that A itself is [V ]-acyclic—notice
Vl
that A ≡ ∃x̄ i=1 qT+i and that dom(Q+ (Ti )) ∩ dom(Q+ (Tj )) ⊆ η(V ), for i 6= j. Hence, var (qT+i ) ∩ var (qT+j ) ⊆ V , for i 6= j.
The claim now follows since every qT+i is acyclic.
Derivation trees
Let D be an S-database and Σ a set of guarded rules. Let q0 (x̄) be a strictly acyclic query whose free variables are exactly
those from x̄ := x1 , . . . , xn and let ā := a1 , . . . , an be a tuple from dom(D). A derivation tree for (ā, q0 (x̄)) with respect to
D and Σ is a finite tree T whose nodes are labeled via a function µ with pairs of the form (b1 , . . . , bk ; q(y1 , . . . , yk )), where
b1 , . . . , bk are constants from dom(D) and q(y1 , . . . , yk ) is a strictly acyclic query over S ∪ sch(Σ) having exactly y1 , . . . , yk
free, such that the following conditions are satisfied:
1. µ(ε) = (ā, q0 (x̄)), where ε is the root node of T .
29
2. If µ(v) = (c1 , . . . , cm ; q(z1 , . . . , zm )) for some node v, then one of the following conditions holds (let c̄ := c1 , . . . , cm and
z̄ := z1 , . . . , zm ):
(a) v is a leaf node and q(z̄) ≡ β(z̄), for some atomic formula β(z̄) such that D |= β(c̄).
(b) The node v has a successor labeled by (c̄, b̄; p(z̄, ȳ)) and it holds that
Σ |= ∀z̄, ȳ (p(z̄, ȳ) → q(z̄)).
(c) The query q(z̄) is logically equivalent to q1 (zi1,1 , . . . , zi1,k1 ) ∧ · · · ∧ ql (zil,1 , . . . , zil,kl ) and v has l successors v1 , . . . , vl
respectively labeled by (ci1,1 , . . . , ci1,k1 ; q1 (zi1,1 , . . . , zi1,ki )), . . . , (cil,1 , . . . , ci1,kl ; ql (zil,1 , . . . , zi1,kl )).
Lemma 44. Let α(x1 , . . . , xn ) be an atomic formula.
(a1 , . . . , an ; α(x1 , . . . , xn )) with respect to D and Σ.
Then D, Σ |= α(a1 , . . . , an ) iff there is a derivation tree for
Proof (sketch). Let ā := a1 , . . . , an and x̄ := x1 , . . . , xn . The direction from right to left is an easy induction on the
construction of the derivation tree. We sketch the other direction. Consider the guarded chase forest (F, η) for D and Σ,
where η is a function labeling the nodes and edges of F. We construct a derivation tree for (ā, α(x̄)) by induction on the
number of chase steps required to derive α(ā) from D and Σ.
For the base case, if D |= α(ā), the claim is obvious since we can apply rule 2.(a). Assume that α(ā) is derived using a rule
σ:
β0 (x̄, ȳ), β1 , . . . , βk → α(x̄),
and a homomorphism µ such that µ(x̄) = ā, where β0 (x̄, ȳ) is the guard of σ. If µ({x̄, ȳ}) ⊆ dom(D), the result immediately
follows by the induction hypothesis. Otherwise, the image of β0 (x̄, ȳ) under µ contains some labeled nulls as arguments.
Assume that all the β1 , . . . , βk contain nulls as their arguments—for those that do not, the induction hypothesis would yield
appropriate derivation trees again. Notice that all the nulls occurring in β1 , . . . , βk appear in µ({ȳ}). By construction of F,
there is a node v0 that is an ancestor of the nodes having the atoms µ(β0 ), µ(β1 ), . . . , µ(βk ) as labels and which has a label of the
form β0 (ā, b̄) which contains no nulls at all as arguments. There is a corresponding atomic formula γ0 (x̄, z̄) whose image under
an appropriate homomorphism equals β0 (ā, b̄). Furthermore, there are atoms γ1 , . . . , γl such that dom({γ1 , . . . , γl }) ⊆ {ā, b̄}
and
Σ |= β0 (ā, b̄) ∧ γ1 ∧ · · · ∧ γl → ∃ȳ (β0 (ā, ȳ) ∧ β1 ∧ · · · ∧ βk ).
Now regard the γi (i = 1, . . . , l) as atomic formulas with free variables among {x̄, z̄}. The formula p(x̄, z̄) := γ0 (x̄, z̄)∧γ1 ∧· · ·∧γl
is then a strictly acyclic query that satisfies Σ |= ∀x̄, z̄ (p(x̄, z̄) → α(x̄)). An application of rule 2.(b) then requires us to find
a derivation tree for (ā, b̄; p(x̄, ȳ)), whence an application of rule 2.(c) reduces this task to finding derivation trees for the
atoms γ0 , γ1 , . . . , γl and their corresponding tuples of constants. These trees exist by induction hypothesis and we can simply
concatenate them appropriately in order to arrive at a derivation tree for (ā, α(x̄)).
Given a guarded formula ϕ(x̄) built up from conjunctions and existential quantification, we define the nesting depth of
ϕ(x̄), denoted nd(ϕ(x̄)), inductively:
• If ϕ(x̄) is an atomic formula, then nd(ϕ(x̄)) := 0.
• If ϕ(x̄) = (ψ1 ∧ ψ2 ), then nd(ϕ(x̄)) := max{nd(ψ1 ), nd(ψ2 )}.
• If ϕ(x̄) = ∃ȳ (α(x̄, ȳ) ∧ ψ) and ȳ 6= ∅, then nd(ϕ(x̄)) := nd(ψ) + 1.
Lemma 45. Let D be a database, Σ a set of guarded rules, and q(x̄) a strictly acyclic conjunctive query. Then D, Σ |= q(ā)
iff there is a derivation tree for (ā, q(x̄)) with respect to D and Σ.
Proof (sketch). We again sketch only the direction from left to right. Let ϕ(x̄) be the strictly guarded formula corresponding to q(x̄). We proceed by induction on the nesting depth of ϕ(x̄). If nd(ϕ(x̄)) = 0, then ϕ(x̄) is quantifier free and
thus a conjunction of atoms α0 (x̄) ∧ α1 ∧ · · · ∧ αk , where var (αi ) ⊆ {x̄} for i = 1, . . . , k. An application of rule 2.(c) reduces
the problem of building a derivation tree for (ā, ϕ(x̄)) to the problem of building corresponding trees for the αi and their
corresponding constants from ā. The existence of these trees is guaranteed by Lemma 44.
Now suppose that nd(ϕ(x̄)) = n + 1. Let ϕ(x̄) = ∃ȳ (α(x̄, ȳ) ∧ ψ) and ȳ := y1 , . . . , yk . Assume, without loss of generality,
that all the bound variables from ϕ(x̄) are pairwise distinct. In the following, we will describe how to construct a derivation
tree for (ā, q(x̄)). If D, Σ |= q(ā), then there is a homomorphism µ mapping each atom of q(x̄) to chase(D, Σ) such that
µ(x̄) = ā. Furthermore, µ maps each atom of q(x̄) to a node of the guarded chase forest F of D and Σ. Let αµ (ā, λ1 , . . . , λk )
denote the atom labeling the node of F where α(x̄, ȳ) is mapped to via µ. Let λi1 , . . . , λil exhaust all elements from λ1 , . . . , λk
that are not from dom(D) and b̄ := λj1 , . . . , λjm exhaust those from λ1 , . . . , λk that are from dom(D). Let ϕ′ (x̄, yj1 , . . . , yjm )
be the formula ∃yi1 , . . . , yil (α(x̄, ȳ) ∧ ψ). Clearly, Σ |= ∀x̄, yj1 , . . . , yjm (ϕ′ (x̄, yj1 , . . . , yjm ) → ϕ(x̄)). Hence, we can create a
successor of (ā, ϕ(x̄)) that is labeled by (ā, b̄; ϕ′ (x̄, yj1 , . . . , yjm )). Assume now that none of the λ1 , . . . , λk is from dom(D).
Furthermore, assume that k ≥ 1, since otherwise we can just simply apply rule 2.(c) to reduce q(x̄) to a conjunction of queries
of the desired form. As in the proof of Lemma 44, there is a node v0 in F whose label β0 (ā, b̄) contains only values from
dom(D) as arguments and such that v0 is an ancestor of the node labeling αµ (ā, λ1 , . . . , λk ). Furthermore, all the atoms from
30
µ(q(x̄)) that contain an element from λ1 , . . . , λk as argument are also located in the subtree rooted at v0 . Let p be the query
that results from deleting all atoms from q(x̄) which are mapped via µ into the subtree rooted at v0 . Notice that p may be
empty and has free variables among x̄. Furthermore p is equivalent to a conjunction p1 ∧ · · · ∧ pl of strictly acyclic queries. Let
β0 (x̄, z̄) be the atomic formula whose image under an appropriate homomorphism equals β0 (ā, b̄). A similar line of reasoning
as in the proof of Lemma 44 shows that there are atomic formulas β1 , . . . , βm such that var (βi ) ⊆ {x̄, z̄} and
∀x̄, z̄ (β0 (x̄, z̄) ∧ β1 ∧ · · · ∧ βm ∧ p → ϕ(x̄)),
whence an application of rule 2.(b) and rule 2.(c) reduces the problem of constructing a derivation tree for (ā, ϕ(x̄)) to that of
constructing corresponding trees for β0 , . . . , βm and p. Notice that p is a conjunction of strictly guarded formulas of nesting
depth at most n. Hence, the induction hypothesis guarantees the existence of such derivation trees.
Having the above results in place, it is easy to show the following statement:
Lemma 46. Let D be a C-tree over S and Q = (S, Σ, q) an OMQ where Σ is guarded and q a BCQ. Then D |= Q iff there
is a squid decomposition δ = (q + , µ, H, A, V := {x̄}) of q and a homomorphism η : µ(q + ) → chase(D, Σ) such that:
1. F |= H is witnessed by η, where F is the subinstance of chase(D, Σ) induced by dom(C).
2. There are strictly acyclic queries q1 , . . . , ql such that
(a) AV (x̄) ≡ q1 ∧ · · · ∧ ql and
(b) for i = 1, . . . , l and free(qi ) = {x̄i }, there are derivation trees for (η(x̄i ), qi ) with respect to D and Σ.
Proof. We can easily prove by induction on the number of chase steps that chase(D, Σ) is an F -tree, where F is the
subinstance of chase(D, Σ) induced by dom(C). Now the lemma at hand is immediate by combining this fact with Lemma 43
and Lemma 45.
We are now ready to proceed with the proof of Lemma 24:
Proof of Lemma 24. Lemma 46 will guide the construction of the 2WAPA we are now going to construct. Suppose
Q = (S, Σ, q) is an OMQ from (G, BCQ) and let l ≥ 1. We are going to construct a 2WAPA AQ,l = (S, ΓS,l , δ, s0 , Ω) that
accepts a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree t iff JtK |= Q. In particular, the number of states of AQ,l will be at most exponential in
the size of Q and at most polynomial in l, while the construction of AQ,l will be feasible in 2ExpTime.
The state set. Let Λ denote the set of all Boolean acyclic queries over S ∪ sch(Σ) that are of size at most 3|q|. Notice that
each of these queries is equivalent to a strictly guarded formula. Furthermore, assume that Λ is closed under V -reducts, for
V ⊆ var (q), provided that they are strictly acyclic as well, i.e., if p ∈ Λ and V ⊆ var (q), then also pV ∈ Λ provided pV is
strictly acyclic. For {ā} ⊆ US,l , let
Ŝ(ā) := {p(x̄/ā) | p ∈ Λ, free(p) = {x̄}, |ā| = |x̄|}
and let Ŝ be the union of all the sets Ŝ(ā). Now the set of states S consists of an initial state, denoted s0 , plus the set Ŝ
factorized modulo logical equivalence. We denote by [p] the equivalence class of a query p ∈ Ŝ. Furthermore, for a strictly
guarded formula ϕ, we may abuse notation and write [ϕ] for the equivalence class of the strictly acyclic query p ∈ Ŝ that is
equivalent to ϕ. Notice that the size of S is exponential in the size of Q, since there are only exponentially many CQs of size
at most 3|q| that are mutually non-equivalent (cf. [10]).
The parity condition. We set Ω(s) := 1, for all s ∈ S. This means that only finite trees are accepted.
The transition function. In the following, for each ρ ∈ ΓS,l , we denote by Θ̂(ρ) the set of all pairs that are of the form
(α1 ∧ · · · ∧ αn , p1 ∧ · · · ∧ pm ) for which there is a squid decomposition of the form (q + , µ, H, T, {x̄}) and a function θ : {x̄} →
names(ρ) such that:
• H {x̄} (θ(x̄)) ≡ α1 ∧ · · · ∧ αn , where all the αi are relational ground atoms.
• T {x̄} (θ(x̄)) ≡ p1 ∧ · · · ∧ pm , where the pi are strictly acyclic queries.
Call two pairs (ϕ1 , ψ1 ) and (ϕ2 , ψ2 ) as above equivalent if ϕ1 ≡ ϕ2 and ψ1 ≡ ψ2 . Let Θ(ρ) be the set of equivalence classes
under this relation and denote by [ϕ, ψ] the equivalence of a pair (ϕ, ψ) under this relation. Now we fix for each [p] ∈ S \ {s0 }
a strictly guarded formula χ[p] that is equivalent to all queries from [p]. Likewise, we fix a function ϑρ : Θ(ρ) → Θ̂(ρ) such
that ϑρ ([ϕ, ψ]) ∈ [ϕ, ψ], i.e., which picks a representative for each equivalence class [ϕ, ψ].
Now let ρ ∈ ΓS,l . Specify δ(·, ρ) as follows:
1. For the initial state s0 , set
δ(s0 , ρ) :=
n
m
^
_ ^
{ [αi ] ∧
[pi ] | (α1 ∧ · · · ∧ αn , p1 ∧ · · · ∧ pm ) ∈ ϑρ (Θ(ρ))}.
i=1
i=1
Intuitively, the automaton selects a squid decomposition where its components are instantiated by names occurring in
the root node of the input tree. The automaton tries to verify the single compartments of the squid decomposition, i.e.,
it tries to match them to the chase expansion of the input database under Σ.
31
2. Let [p] ∈ S \ {s0 }. We define δ([p], ρ) according to a case distinction:
(a) Suppose that p ≡ ⊤. Then δ([p], ρ) := true.
(b) Suppose χ[p] = ∃ȳ (α(ā, ȳ) ∧ ϕ), where α(ā, ȳ) is an atomic formula (including equality), free(ϕ) ⊆ {ȳ}, and ā
exhausts all names occuring in α. If {ā} 6⊆ names(ρ) then δ([p], ρ) := false. Otherwise,
_
_
δ([p], ρ) := {[ϕ(ȳ/b̄)] | ρ |= α(ā, b̄), {b̄} ⊆ names(ρ)} ∨ ✸[p] ∨
impl(p, ρ),
where
impl(p, ρ) := {[p1 ] ∧ · · · ∧ [pn ] | [p1 ], . . . , [pn ] ∈ S \ {s0 }, {b̄} ⊆ names(ρ),
p1 ∧ · · · ∧ pn ≡ q,
Σ |= ∀x̄, ȳ (q(ā/x̄, b̄/ȳ) → p(ā/x̄))}.
We provide some intuitive explanation for this second case.
(a) If p is the empty query, it can be satisfied at any input node and, hence, the automaton accepts unconditionally
on this computation branch.
(b) Otherwise, we first inspect the strictly guarded formula χ[p] at hand. If the names occurring in the guard α(ā, ȳ)
are not present at the current node, it rejects. Otherwise, it tries to satisfy α(ā, ȳ) with all possible assignments
for ȳ at the current node and then proceed in state [ϕ(ȳ/b̄)]. Apart from these possibilities, the automaton can
decide to move to any neighboring node (i.e., the parent or a child) while remaining in state [p]. This amounts to
an exhaustive search of the input tree that tries to satisfy p in the input tree. Furthermore, the automaton may
choose to construct derivation trees for p. There, it uses the information provided by Σ in order to find strictly
acyclic queries p1 , . . . , pn that imply p. Consequently, it tries to proceed its search with [p1 ], . . . , [pn ].
We shall now briefly comment on the running time needed to construct AQ,l . The interesting part of the construction
concerns the transition function δ, in particular point 2.(b) involving impl(p, ρ). We have seen that in the proofs of Lemma 44
and Lemma 45 that there are double-exponentially many candidates for the query q(ā/x̄, b̄/ȳ) that (possibly) implies p(ā/x̄)
under Σ. Furthermore, q(ā/x̄, b̄/ȳ) consists of at most exponentially many atoms. Each check whether such a query q at hand
implies p requires at most double-exponential time in the size of p. This follows from the well-known fact that checking query
implication under a set of guarded rules is feasible in 2ExpTime with respect to the size of the right-hand side query, and
in polynomial time with respect to the size of the left-hand side query (cf. [23]), i.e., the data complexity of query answering
under guarded tgds is polynomial time.
PROOFS OF SECTION 6
Proof of Theorem 26
A proof sketch is given in the main body of the paper. However, the fact that Cont((G, CQ), (S, CQ)) is in 2ExpTime deserves
a formal proof. Recall that to establish the latter result we need a more refined complexity analysis of the problem of deciding
whether a guarded OMQ is contained in a UCQ; this is discussed in the main body of the paper. In fact, it suffices to show
the following result. As in the previous section, we focus on constant-free tgds and CQs, but all the results can be extended
to the general case at the price of more involved definitions and proofs. Moreover, we assume that tgds have only one atom in
the head. Recall that we write var ≥2 (q) for the variables of q that appear in more than one atom, and we also write var =1 (q)
for the variables of q that appear only in one atom. Then:
Proposition 47. Consider Q ∈ (G, BCQ) and a Boolean CQ q. The problem of deciding whether Q ⊆ q is feasible in
1. double-exponential time in (||Q|| + |var ≥2 (q)|); and
2. exponential time in |var =1 (q)|.
It is easy to verify that the above result, together with the algorithm devised in the main body of the paper, implies that
Cont((G, CQ), (S, CQ)) is in 2ExpTime. The rest of this section is devoted to show the above proposition. Our crucial task is,
given a CQ q, to devise an automaton that accepts consistent labeled trees which correspond to databases that make q true.
Lemma 48. Let q be a Boolean CQ over S. There is a 2WAPA Aq,l , where l > 0, that accepts a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree t
iff JtK |= q. The number of states of Aq,l is exponential in |var ≥2 (q)| and polynomial in (|var =1 (q)| + ar (S) + l). Furthermore,
Aq,l can be constructed in exponential time.
Proof. We are going to construct Aq,l = (S, ΓS,l , δ, s0 , Ω). Let x1 , . . . , xn be the variables of var =1 (q) and fix a total order
x1 ≺ x2 ≺ · · · ≺ xn among them. Define the state set S to be
S := {sy,θ | θ : V → US,l , V ⊆ var ≥2 (q), y ∈ var =1 (q) ∪ {♯}}.
Notice that |S| = O(|var =1 (q)| · (ar (S) + l)|var ≥2 (q)| ). We set s0 := s♯,∅ , where ∅ denotes the empty substitution. In the
following, we treat q as a set of relational atoms and let X = var ≥2 (q). For ρ ∈ ΓS,l and sy,θ ∈ S, define δ(sy,θ , ρ) as follows:
32
• If y = ♯, distinguish the following cases:
1. If there is an atom α ∈ θ(q) such that var (α) ∩ X 6= ∅ and dom(α) ∩ US,l 6⊆ names(ρ), then δ(s♯,θ , ρ) := false.
2. Otherwise, let
δ(s♯,θ , ρ) :=
(W
{s♯,η | η ⊇ θ, ρ |= ∃x̄
sx1 ,θ ,
V
• Suppose y = xi , for some i = 1, . . . , n. Let αi,θ denote the
sxi+1 ,θ ,
δ(sxi ,θ , ρ) :=
true,
✸s
xi ,θ ,
(η(q) \ θ(q))} ∨ ✸s♯,θ ,
if X ∩ var (θ(q)) 6= ∅,
otherwise.
unique atom α ∈ θ(q) such that xi ∈ var (α). Set
if ρ |= ∃x̄ αi,θ and i < n,
if ρ |= ∃x̄ αi,θ and i = n,
otherwise.
Set the parity condition Ω to be Ω(s) := 1 for all s ∈ S. Intuitively, the automaton works in two passes. The first pass consists
of the runs working on states of the form s♯,θ . In this pass, the automaton tries to find an assignment for the variables in the
query that appear in at least two distinct atoms. When a candidate assignment θ is found, the automaton changes to state
sx1 ,θ which is the beginning of the second pass. A state of the form sxi ,θ means that the assignment θ can be extended to all
variables x ≺ xi and, in this state, the automaton tries to extend θ to cover the variable xi . The automaton accepts if it is
able to extend the candidate assignment θ to all x1 , . . . , xn .
Having the above result in place, we can now reduce the problem in question to the emptiness problem for 2WAPA.
Lemma 49. Consider Q ∈ (G, BCQ) and a Boolean CQ q. We can construct in double-exponential time in ||Q|| and in
exponential time in ||q|| a 2WAPA A, which has exponentially many states in (||Q|| + |var ≥2 (q)|) and polynomially many
states in |var =1 (q)|, such that
Q ⊆ q ⇐⇒ L(A) = ∅.
′
Proof. Let Q = (S, Σ, q ) and l = ar (S ∪ sch(Σ)) · |q ′ |. Then A is defined as:
(CS,l ∩ AQ,l ) ∩ Aq,l .
It is an easy task to verify that the claim follows from Lemmas 22, 23, 24, and 48.
It is clear that Proposition 47 is an easy consequence of Lemma 49.
PROOFS OF SECTION 7
Recall that we focus on unary and binary predicates. Moreover, we consider constant-free tgds and CQs, and we assume that
tgds have only one atom in the head.
Proof of Proposition 30
Basics. Let D be a C-tree of width two. We say that a tree decomposition δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) witnessing that D is a C-tree
is lean, if it satisfies the following conditions:
• The elements from dom(C) occur only in the root of T and its immediate successors.
• If w is a child of v in T , then there are unique c, d ∈ dom(D) such that Xv ∩ Xw = {c} and Xw \ Xv = {d}. The element
d is called new at w.
• It follows from the previous item that every node v 6= ε in T has a unique new element c ∈ dom(D). We additionally
require that c appears in the bag of each child of v.
Intuitively, C-trees D that have lean tree decomposition represent the actual tree structure of D. It is fairly straightforward
to see that every C-tree has a lean tree decomposition.
Recall that the Gaifman graph of D is the graph G(D) = (V, E) with V := dom(D) and (a, b) ∈ E if a and b coexist in some
atom of D. Given two nodes a, b from G(D), the distance from a to b in G(D), denoted dG(D) (a, b), is the minimum length of
a path between a and b, and ∞ if such a path does not exist. For a, b ∈ dom(D), we denote by dδ (a, b) the minimum distance
among two nodes of T that respectively have a and b in their bags. We call dδ (a, b) the distance from a to b in δ.
Notice that in a tree decomposition δ witnessing that D is a C-tree, any element a ∈ dom(D), if a appears in the bag
of v, then it occurs only at v, at v and its children, or at v and its parent. Since furthermore the bag of the root node is
uniquely determined by C, each node in the tree has a uniquely determined set of child nodes whose bags are determined by
the structure of D alone. Therefore, the following two lemmas follow immediately.
Lemma 50. Let δ = (T , (Xt )t∈T ) be a lean tree decomposition witnessing that D is a C-tree. Then dδ (a, b) ≤ dG(D) (a, b)
for all a, b ∈ dom(D).
33
Lemma 51. Let δ and δ ′ be two lean tree decompositions witnessing that D is a C-tree. Then dδ (a, b) = dδ′ (a, b) for all
a, b ∈ dom(D).
In the following, we denote by D≤k the subinstance of D induced by the set of elements whose distance from any a ∈ dom(C)
in any lean tree decomposition δ is bounded by k. The subinstance D>k is defined analogously.The branching degree of a lean
tree decomposition is the maximum number of child nodes of any node contained in the tree of δ. Notice that two lean tree
decompositions of a C-tree D always have the same branching degree; the argument is similar as for the two lemmas above.
Hence, we can simply speak about the branching degree of D.
Encodings. Recall that a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree t = (T, µ) encodes information on an S-database D and an appropriate
tree decomposition δ of D. It is clear that JtK has a lean tree decomposition, but it is not guaranteed that this is reflected in
δ as well. We call (the consistent) t lean, if the tree decomposition δt = (T := (T, E), (Xv )v∈T ) is, where xEy iff y = x · i for
some i ∈ N \ {0} and Xv := {[v]a | a ∈ names(v)}. The following is easy to prove:
Lemma 52. There is a 2WAPA on trees LS,l that accepts a consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree iff it is lean. The number of states
of LS,l is bounded logarithmically in the size of ΓS,l and LS,l can be constructed in polynomial time in the size of ΓS,l .
Let t = (T, µ) be a labeled tree. The branching degree of a node x ∈ T is the cardinality of {i | x · i ∈ T, i ∈ N \ {0}}; the
branching degree of t is the maximum over all branching degrees of its nodes and ∞ is this maximum does not exist. We also
say that t is m-ary if the branching degree of t is bounded by m. A node x ∈ T is a leaf node of t if it has branching degree
zero. The depth of T is the maximum length among the lengths of all branches and ∞ if this maximum does not exist. Let
us remark that the branching degree of the lean ΓS,l -labeled tree t as defined for labeled trees equals the branching degree of
JtK as defined above.
Lemma 53. Let Q = (S, Σ, q) be an OMQ from (G2 , BCQ). There is an m ≥ 0 such that the following are equivalent:
1. There is an S-database D such that D |= Q.
2. There is a C-tree D̂ with |dom(C)| ≤ 2|q| and branching degree at most m such that D̂ |= Q.
Proof. Let l := 2|q| and, let AQ,l be the 2WAPA from Lemma 24. Take the intersection of AQ,l with (i) the 2WAPA CS,l
from Lemma 23 and (ii) the 2WAPA from Lemma 52 that checks leanness. Call the resulting automaton B. Then B accepts
a ΓS,l -labeled tree t iff t is lean and consistent and JtK |= Q. We let m be the number of states of B and claim that this is the
required bound on the branching degree.
First of all, notice that the first item of the lemma trivially implies the second independently from the choice of m. For the
other direction, suppose that D |= Q for some S-database D. Then there is a C-tree B such that dom(C) ≤ 2|q| and B |= Q.
Being a C-tree, B has a lean tree decomposition δ and the encoding of B together with δ corresponds to a lean ΓS,l -labeled
tree t. It follows that t ∈ L(B). By the results of [44], it follows that there is a t′ ∈ L(B) whose branching degree is bounded
by the number of states of B, i.e., by m. The tree t′ is lean and consistent, therefore Jt′ K is a C ′ -tree of branching degree at
most m for some C ′ ⊆ JtK such that |dom(C ′ )| ≤ 2|q|. Furthermore, Jt′ K |= Q, as required.
We are now ready to prove Proposition 30:
Proof of Proposition 30. We largely follow [16] here. Choose m as in Lemma 53 above. Suppose first that Q is UCQ
rewritable. Let p := p1 ∨ · · · ∨ pn be a corresponding UCQ rewriting. Since the query q is connected, we can assume that p
is as well. We choose k > max{|pi | : i = 1, . . . , n} and suppose that D |= Q for some C-tree D. Since p is a UCQ rewriting,
D |= pi for some i = 1, . . . , n. Fix a homomorphism µ witnessing that D |= pi . We distinguish cases. Suppose first that
µ(var (pi )) ∩ dom(C) 6= ∅. Since p is connected, it follows D≤k |= pi by Lemma 50 and so D≤k |= p. On the other hand, if
µ(var (p)) ∩ dom(C) = ∅, then it is also easy to check that D>0 |= p.
For the other direction, suppose that the second item of the proposition’s statement holds, i.e., there is a k ≥ 0 such that
for all C-trees D over S with |dom(C)| ≤ 2|q| and branching degree at most m it holds that D |= Q implies D≤k |= Q or
D>0 |= Q. Let Λ be the set of all C-trees such that |dom(C)| ≤ 2|q| and that have branching degree at most m such that
D |= Q. We regard Λ as a set
W of BCQs and regard it as factorized modulo logical equivalence. It is clear that Λ is finite
then and we claim that p := n
i=1 pi is a UCQ rewriting of Q. We explicitly include the case where Λ is empty, in which case
p is equivalent to the empty disjunction ⊥ and there is no database D at all such that D |= Q. To see that p is indeed a
UCQ rewriting of Q, let D be an S-database such that D |= p. Then there is an i = 1, . . . , n such that D |= pi . Furthermore,
[pi ] |= Q and so D |= Q as well, since Q is closed under homomorphisms. Suppose now D |= Q. We know that there is
a C-tree D̂ with |dom(C)| ≤ l := 2|q| and branching degree at most m such that D̂ |= Q and—when we regard D̂ as an
instance—there is a homomorphism from D̂ to D. Let D′ ⊆ D̂ be a minimal connected subset of D̂ such that D′ |= Q.
′
′
D′ is again a C ′ -tree for some C ′ ⊆ D′ . Therefore D≤k
|= Q or D>0
|= Q. The latter is impossible by minimality of D′ .
′
′
′
Hence, D≤k
|= Q and so there is a (logically equivalent) copy of D≤k
contained in Λ. Hence, D≤k
|= p, therefore D′ |= p,
and hence D̂ |= p. Recall that, when D̂ is regarded as an instance, there is a homomorphism from D̂ to D. Therefore, D |= p.
34
Proof of Proposition 31
Let Q = (S, Σ, q) be an OMQ from (G2 , BCQ) such that q is connected. We are going to show that the desired 2WAPA A
can be constructed in 2ExpTime. Notice that, using similar results as in [16], this gives us a decision procedure for deciding
UCQRew(G2 , CQ) also for non-connected queries. Let us first introduce some auxiliary notions.
2WAPAs on m-ary trees. A 2WAPA B on m-ary trees is just defined as a 2WAPA, except that its transitions tran(B) are
{hkis, [k]s | −1 ≤ k ≤ m, s ∈ S}, where S is the state set of B. The notion of run is then defined on m-ary trees only and its
definition is modified in the obvious way so as to deal with the transitions hkis, [k]s. Intuitively, for k = 1, . . . , m, a transition
hkis means that the automaton should move to the k-th child of the current node (which is then required to exist) and assume
state s. Correspondingly, [k]s means that the automaton should move to the k-th child and assume state s provided that
this k-th child exists at all. We remark that all 2WAPAs constructed in this paper so far can easily be modified to work on
m-ary trees as well and we shall assume in the following that they do so. Furthermore, deciding whether L(B) is feasible in
exponential time in the number of states of B and in polynomial time in the size of the input alphabet of B (cf. [57]).
Let m be as in Proposition 30. In the following, we shall regard all trees mentioned in the following as m-ary and let
l := 2|q|. Before proceeding to a proof of Proposition 31, we must make the notion of being an “extension” of a labeled tree
more precise.
Extensions of trees. Let BQ be a 2WAPA that accepts a ΓS,l -labeled tree t iff (i) t is lean and consistent, (ii) JtK |= Q,
and (iii) JtK>0 6|= Q. Notice that a 2WAPA A>0
Q that accepts a lean and consistent ΓS,l -labeled tree iff JtK>0 6|= Q can be
easily constructed using the construction in Lemma 24. Hence, BQ can be constructed intersecting several 2WAPAs we have
already encountered.
Let Π be the set of all tuples of the form (s, s′ ), where s and s′ are states of BQ . We define a new alphabet Λ := 2KS,l ∪Π .
Notice that Λ is of double-exponential size in the size of Q. For ρ ∈ Λ, we denote by ρ ↾ ΓS,l the restriction of ρ to ΓS,l , that is,
ρ ∩ KS,l . The restriction of a Λ-labeled tree t to ΓS,l , denoted t ↾ ΓS,l , is the tree that arises from t when we restrict the label
of each node of t to ΓS,l . We say that a Λ-labeled tree is consistent if (i) its restriction to ΓS,l is consistent and (ii) symbols
ρ ∈ Λ such that ρ ∩ Π 6= ∅ appear only in leaf nodes of t. Likewise, we say that a consistent t is lean if t ↾ ΓS,l is. The
decoding JtK of t is naturally extended to consistent Λ-labeled trees by setting JtK := Jt ↾ ΓS,l K. The following lemma is a
straightforward extension of Lemmas 23 and 52.
Lemma 54. There are 2WAPAs CΛ and LΛ that respectively accept a Λ-labeled tree iff it is consistent and lean. Both have
logarithmically many states in the size of Λ and can be constructed in polynomial time in the size of Λ.
Let t be a lean and consistent Λ-labeled tree. We say that t′ is an extension of t if t′ is a ΓS,l -labeled tree that arises from
t by attaching ΓS,l -labeled trees to those leaves of t that contain elements from Π. Furthermore, for such nodes, the labels of
the corresponding nodes in t′ are those of t restricted to ΓS,l .
Definition 14. Let LQ be the set of all lean and consistent Λ-labeled trees t such that JtK 6|= Q, yet there is an extension t′
of t such that Jt′ K |= Q and Jt′ K>0 6|= Q.
Lemma 55. LQ is infinite iff Q is not UCQ rewritable.
Proof. Suppose LQ is infinite. Since the trees at hand have bounded branching degree, for every k ≥ 0, there is a t ∈ LQ
such that JtK is a C-tree (for some C ⊆ JtK) that contains individuals whose distance from any a ∈ dom(C) is greater than
or equal to k and JtK 6|= Q, yet for some extension t′ of t, we have Jt′ K |= Q but Jt′ K>0 6|= Q. Suppose now that Q is UCQ
rewritable. Let ℓ be such that for all C ′ -trees D (of the appropriate dimensions), D |= Q implies D≤ℓ |= Q or D>0 |= Q.
Choose k > ℓ and t, t′ such that (i) t′ is an extension of t, (ii) t has depth greater than k, and (iii) JtK 6|= Q but Jt′ K |= Q and
Jt′ K>0 6|= Q. Since Jt′ K |= Q, we know that Jt′ K≤ℓ |= Q or Jt′ K>0 |= Q. The latter is impossible by assumption, the former
contradicts the fact JtK 6|= Q, since k > ℓ. This proves the direction from left to right. The other direction is immediate.
We are now ready to establish Proposition 31:
Proof of Proposition 31. We are now going to describe the construction of a 2WAPA A such that L(A) = LQ , which
will prove the claim by virtue of Lemma 55. This automaton is the intersection of several ones. First of all, we ensure that all
the accepted Λ-trees are lean and consistent (cf. Lemma 54). We additionally intersect the automaton with the complement of
AQ,l from Lemma 23 (more precisely, the version of it running on Λ-labeled trees) and another automaton DQ = (S, Λ, δ, s0 , Ω)
whose construction we shall describe in more detail here. On a high level, DQ will be constructed so as to accept a lean and
consistent Λ-labeled tree if and only if there is an extension t′ of t such that BQ accepts t′ . Let Ŝ be the set of states of BQ ,
δ̂ its transition function, and Ω̂ its parity function. For σ ∈ ΓS,l , let B̂(σ) be the set of tuples (s, s′ ) ∈ Ŝ × (Ŝ ∪ {true}) such
that the following holds:
• There is a ΓS,l -labeled tree t = (T, η) such that η(ε) = σ and a run tr = (Tr , ηr ) of BQ on t such that
1. ηr (ε) = (ε, s), i.e., tr starts from s;12
12
Strictly speaking, tr is, of course, not a run since it does not start in the initial state.
35
2. s′ = true and tr is accepting on BQ , or there is a node v ∈ Tr such that ηr (v) = (ε, s′ ).
Now the set of states of DQ is the same as of BQ , i.e., S := Ŝ. Accordingly, the initial state of DQ is that of BQ . Furthermore
Ω(s) := Ω̂(s), for every s ∈ S. Given s ∈ S and ρ ∈ Λ, we let
_
δ(s, ρ) := {s′ | (s, s′ ) ∈ ρ ∩ B̂(ΓS,l ↾ ρ)} ∨ δ̂(s, ΓS,l ↾ ρ).
We are going to give an intuitive explanation of this construction in the following. Roughly, a pair (s, s′ ) ∈ B̂(σ) indicates
that there is a ΓS,l -labeled tree t and run of BQ on t such that the root of t is labeled with σ, the run starts in state
s, and either BQ accepts t, or it traverses the root again at some point, then being in state s′ . The set B̂(σ) can be
computed a priori in 2ExpTime; considering that ΓS,l is of double-exponential size in the size of Q, it follows that the
collection {B̂(σ)}σ∈ΓS,l can be computed in 2ExpTime. Now the input tree for DQ comes with labels from Π of the form
(s, s′ ) in its leaves. These “types” amount to guesses of possible extensions of the input tree. Utilizing the sets B̂(σ),
DQ thus explores the possible ways how the given input tree can be extended to a ΓS,l -labeled tree t′ that is accepted by BQ .
9.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Abiteboul, R. Hull, and V. Vianu. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley, 1995.
[2] A. Amarilli, M. Benedikt, P. Bourhis, and M. Vanden Boom. Query answering with transitive and linear-ordered data.
In IJCAI, pages 893–899, 2016.
[3] T. J. Ameloot, B. Ketsman, F. Neven, and D. Zinn. Weaker forms of monotonicity for declarative networking: A more
fine-grained answer to the calm-conjecture. In PODS, pages 64–75, 2014.
[4] T. J. Ameloot, B. Ketsman, F. Neven, and D. Zinn. Datalog queries distributing over components. In ICDT, pages
308–323, 2015.
[5] T. J. Ameloot, F. Neven, and J. V. den Bussche. Relational transducers for declarative networking. J. ACM, 60(2):15,
2013.
[6] M. Arenas, R. Hull, W. Martens, T. Milo, and T. Schwentick. Foundations of Data Management (Dagstuhl perspectives
workshop 16151). Dagstuhl Reports, 6(4):39–56, 2016.
[7] F. Baader, M. Bienvenu, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter. Query and predicate emptiness in ontology-based data access. J.
Artif. Intell. Res. (JAIR), 56:1–59, 2016.
[8] J.-F. Baget, M. Leclère, M.-L. Mugnier, and E. Salvat. On rules with existential variables: Walking the decidability
line. Artif. Intell., 175(9-10):1620–1654, 2011.
[9] V. Bárány, M. Benedikt, and B. ten Cate. Rewriting guarded negation queries. In MFCS, pages 98–110, 2013.
[10] V. Bárány, G. Gottlob, and M. Otto. Querying the guarded fragment. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 10(2),
2014.
[11] P. Barceló, G. Berger, and A. Pieris. Containment for rule-based ontology-mediated queries. CoRR, abs/1703.07994,
2017.
[12] C. Beeri and M. Y. Vardi. The implication problem for data dependencies. In ICALP, pages 73–85, 1981.
[13] M. Benedikt, P. Bourhis, and M. Vanden Boom. A step up in expressiveness of decidable fixpoint logics. In LICS, pages
817–826, 2016.
[14] M. Benedikt and G. Gottlob. The impact of virtual views on containment. PVLDB, 3(1):297–308, 2010.
[15] G. Berger and A. Pieris. Ontology-mediated queries distributing over components. In IJCAI, pages 943–949, 2016.
[16] M. Bienvenu, P. Hansen, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter. First order-rewritability and containment of conjunctive queries in
horn description logics. In IJCAI, pages 965–971, 2016.
[17] M. Bienvenu, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter. Query containment in description logics reconsidered. In KR, 2012.
[18] M. Bienvenu, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter. First-order rewritability of atomic queries in horn description logics. In IJCAI,
pages 754–760, 2013.
[19] M. Bienvenu, B. ten Cate, C. Lutz, and F. Wolter. Ontology-based data access: a study through disjunctive datalog,
csp, and MMSNP. In PODS, pages 213–224, 2013.
[20] P. Bourhis, M. Krötzsch, and S. Rudolph. Reasonable highly expressive query languages. In IJCAI, pages 2826–2832,
2015.
[21] P. Bourhis, M. Manna, M. Morak, and A. Pieris. Guarded-based disjunctive tuple-generating dependencies. ACM
Trans. Database Syst., 41(4), 2016.
[22] P. Buneman, S. B. Davidson, G. G. Hillebrand, and D. Suciu. A query language and optimization techniques for
unstructured data. In SIGMOD., pages 505–516, 1996.
[23] A. Calı̀, G. Gottlob, and M. Kifer. Taming the infinite chase: Query answering under expressive relational constraints.
In KR, pages 70–80, 2008.
[24] A. Calı̀, G. Gottlob, and M. Kifer. Taming the infinite chase: Query answering under expressive relational constraints.
J. Artif. Intell. Res., 48:115–174, 2013.
[25] A. Calı̀, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz. A general Datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over
ontologies. J. Web Sem., 14:57–83, 2012.
36
[26] A. Calı̀, G. Gottlob, and A. Pieris. Advanced processing for ontological queries. PVLDB, 3(1):554–565, 2010.
[27] A. Calı̀, G. Gottlob, and A. Pieris. Towards more expressive ontology languages: The query answering problem. Artif.
Intell., 193:87–128, 2012.
[28] D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, D. Lembo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Tractable reasoning and efficient query
answering in description logics: The DL-Lite family. J. Autom. Reasoning, 39(3):385–429, 2007.
[29] A. K. Chandra and P. M. Merlin. Optimal implementation of conjunctive queries in relational data bases. In STOC,
pages 77–90, 1977.
[30] S. Chaudhuri, R. Krishnamurthy, S. Potamianos, and K. Shim. Optimizing queries with materialized views. In ICDE,
pages 190–200, 1995.
[31] S. Chaudhuri and M. Y. Vardi. On the equivalence of recursive and nonrecursive datalog programs. J. Comput. Syst.
Sci., 54(1):61–78, 1997.
[32] S. S. Cosmadakis, H. Gaifman, P. C. Kanellakis, and M. Y. Vardi. Decidable optimization problems for database logic
programs (preliminary report). In STOC, pages 477–490, 1988.
[33] E. Dantsin and A. Voronkov. Complexity of query answering in logic databases with complex values. In LFCS, pages
56–66, 1997.
[34] T. Eiter, T. Lukasiewicz, and L. Predoiu. Generalized consistent query answering under existential rules. In KR, pages
359–368, 2016.
[35] R. Fagin, P. G. Kolaitis, R. J. Miller, and L. Popa. Data exchange: Semantics and query answering. Theor. Comput.
Sci., 336(1):89–124, 2005.
[36] R. Fagin and M. Y. Vardi. The theory of data dependencies - an overview. In ICALP, pages 1–22, 1984.
[37] M. F. Fernández, D. Florescu, A. Y. Levy, and D. Suciu. Verifying integrity constraints on web sites. In IJCAI, pages
614–619, 1999.
[38] J. Flum, M. Frick, and M. Grohe. Query evaluation via tree-decompositions. J. ACM, 49(6):716–752, 2002.
[39] M. Friedman, A. Y. Levy, and T. D. Millstein. Navigational plans for data integration. In AAAI/IAAI, pages 67–73,
1999.
[40] G. Gottlob, G. Orsi, and A. Pieris. Query rewriting and optimization for ontological databases. ACM Trans. Database
Syst., 39(3):25:1–25:46, 2014.
[41] G. Gottlob and C. H. Papadimitriou. On the complexity of single-rule datalog queries. Inf. Comput., 183(1):104–122,
2003.
[42] G. Gottlob, A. Pieris, and M. Simkus. The impact of active domain predicates on guarded existential rules. In RR,
pages 94–110, 2016.
[43] G. Gottlob, S. Rudolph, and M. Simkus. Expressiveness of guarded existential rule languages. In PODS, pages 27–38,
2014.
[44] E. Grädel and I. Walukiewicz. Guarded fixed point logic. In LICS, pages 45–54, 1999.
[45] T. Imielinski and W. L. Jr. Incomplete information in relational databases. J. ACM, 31(4):761–791, 1984.
[46] D. S. Johnson. A catalog of complexity classes. In Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, pages 67–161. 1990.
[47] D. S. Johnson and A. C. Klug. Testing containment of conjunctive queries under functional and inclusion dependencies.
J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 28(1):167–189, 1984.
[48] T. Lukasiewicz, M. V. Martinez, A. Pieris, and G. I. Simari. From classical to consistent query answering under
existential rules. In AAAI, pages 1546–1552, 2015.
[49] D. Maier, A. O. Mendelzon, and Y. Sagiv. Testing implications of data dependencies. ACM Trans. Database Syst.,
4(4):455–469, 1979.
[50] S. Malik and L. Zhang. Boolean satisfiability: from theoretical hardness to practical success. CACM, 52(68):76–82, 2009.
[51] A. Poggi, D. Lembo, D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Linking data to ontologies. J. Data
Semantics, 10:133–173, 2008.
[52] A. Robinson and A. Voronkov. Handbook of Automated Reasoning. The MIT Press, 2001.
[53] B. Rossman. Homomorphism preservation theorems. J. ACM, 55(3), 2008.
[54] Y. Sagiv and M. Yannakakis. Equivalences among relational expressions with the union and difference operators. J.
ACM, 27(4):633–655, 1980.
[55] O. Shmueli. Equivalence of DATALOG queries is undecidable. J. Log. Program., 15(3):231–241, 1993.
[56] M. Y. Vardi. Automata theory for database theoreticans. In Theoretical Studies in Computer Science, pages 153–180,
1992.
[57] M. Y. Vardi. Reasoning about the past with two-way automata. In ICALP, pages 628–641, 1998.
[58] T. Wilke. Alternating tree automata, parity games, and modal µ-calculus. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. Simon Stevin,
8(2):359–391, 2001.
37
| 2cs.AI
|
HYPERBOLICITY AND NEAR HYPERBOLICITY OF QUADRATIC
FORMS OVER FUNCTION FIELDS OF QUADRICS
arXiv:1609.07100v2 [math.AC] 9 Oct 2017
STEPHEN SCULLY
Abstract. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms over a field F of characteristic
6= 2, let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let k
denote the dimension of the anisotropic part of q after scalar extension to the function
field F (p) of p. We conjecture that dim(q) must lie within k of a multiple of 2s+1 . This
can be viewed as a direct generalization of Hoffmann’s Separation theorem. Among
other cases, we prove that the conjecture is true if k < 2s−1 . When k = 0, this shows
that any anisotropic form representing an element of the kernel of the natural restriction
homomorphism W (F ) → W (F (p)) has dimension divisible by 2s+1 .
1. Introduction
Many of the central problems in the algebraic theory of quadratic forms seem to demand
an investigation of the behaviour of quadratic forms under scalar extension to function
fields of quadrics. This was already apparent from the early beginnings of the subject,
with function fields of Pfister quadrics being used in an essential way to prove the fundamental Arason-Pfister Hauptsatz of 1971 ([AP71]). Arason and Pfister’s work led to the
foundational papers of Elman-Lam ([EL72]) and Knebusch ([Kne76],[Kne77]), after which
properties of function fields of quadrics have been systematically studied and exploited
in many of the major developments in the theory; notable examples include the proof
of the Milnor conjectures ([Voe03],[OVV07]) and essentially all advances on Kaplansky’s
problem concerning the possible u-invariants of fields ([Mer91],[Izh01],[Vis09]).
An important problem in this context is the following: Let p and q be anisotropic
quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over a field F of characteristic 6= 2, and let F (p) denote
the function field of the projective quadric {p = 0}. Under what circumstances does q
become isotropic over F (p)? While this problem seems to be rather intractable in general,
the extraction of partial information is already enough for non-trivial applications. As a
result, it has been of great interest here to identity general constraints coming from the
basic invariants of the forms p and q. A key breakthrough in this direction was made in
[Hof95], where Hoffmann determined the constraints coming from the simplest invariants
of all, namely, the dimensions of p and q. More precisely, Hoffmann’s “Separation theorem”
asserts that if dim(q) ≤ 2s < dim(p) for some integer s, then q remains anisotropic over
F (p), and this is optimal, in the sense that isotropy can occur in all other cases. An
important generalization of Hoffmann’s theorem taking into account one further invariant
of p was later given by Karpenko and Merkurjev in [KM03].
The present article is concerned with the following variant of the above question: To
what extent can the form q become isotropic over F (p)? Formally, the extent to which
a quadratic form is isotropic is measured by its Witt index, i.e., the maximal dimension
of a totally isotropic subspace of the vector space on which it is defined. In analogy with
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 11E04, 14E05, 14C15.
Key words and phrases. Quadratic forms, function fields of quadrics, hyperbolicity, near hyperbolicity,
Witt kernels.
1
2
STEPHEN SCULLY
Hoffmann’s result, one can ask the following: What constraints do the dimensions of p
and q impose on the Witt index iW (qF (p) ) of q after extension to F (p)? Here the results of
[Hof95] and [KM03] only go so far. In particular, they are essentially vacuous in the case
where dim(p) ≤ dim(q)/2, whereas the problem itself is non-trivial in all dimensions. A
similar criticism applies to the main result of [Scu16], which gives a certain refinement the
result of Karpenko and Merkurjev. The purpose of this paper is to propose the following
conjectural answer to the above problem:
Conjecture 1.1. Suppose that p and q are anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F . Let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let
k = dim(q) − 2iW (qF (p) ) (i.e., k is the dimension of the anisotropic part of qF (p) ). Then
dim(q) = a2s+1 + ǫ
for some non-negative integer a and some integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k.
Again, it is not hard to see that this is optimal, to the extent that there can be no
further gaps in the possible values of dim(q) determined by iW (qF (p) ) and dim(p) alone
(see Example 1.5 below). In particular, the statement include’s Hoffmann’s theorem:
Example 1.2. Suppose that dim(q) ≤ 2s , so that we have separation of dimensions by a
power of 2. The reader will easily confirm that, in this case, it is only possible to express
dim(q) in the suggested way if k = dim(q), i.e., if q remains anisotropic over F (p).
Conjecture 1.1 is vacuously true if k ≥ 2s − 1, so we are interested here in the case
where k ≤ 2s − 2. In other words, beyond the Separation theorem, we are looking at the
situation in which iW (qF (p)) is “large” (which explains the title of the article). Loosely
speaking, the conjecture asserts that the more isotropic q becomes over F (p), the closer
its dimension should be to being divisible by 2s+1 . Our main result is the following:
Theorem 1.3. Conjecture 1.1 is true when k < 2s−1 .
In particular, the conjecture is true in the extreme case where k = 0, which translates
as follows:
Corollary 1.4. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F ,
and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . If q becomes
hyperbolic over F (p), then dim(q) is divisible by 2s+1 .
Put another way, Corollary 1.4 says the following: Let W (F (p)/F ) denote the kernel of
the natural scalar extension homomorphism W (F ) → W (F (p)) on Witt groups. If q represents an element of W (F (p)/F ), then dim(q) is divisible by 2s+1 . A few low-dimensional
cases aside (see, e.g., [Fit83]), this seems to have been unknown, even conjecturally.1. In
fact, one can go rather further here, and show that all higher Witt indices of q, except
possibly the last, are divisible by 2s+1 in this case (Theorem 3.4). This can be viewed
as a precise generalization of a well-known theorem of Fitzgerald ([Fit81]) on the lowdimensional part of W (F (p)/F ) (see 3.B below). Although the proof of the Arason-Pfister
Hauptsatz already drew serious attention to the problem of determining Witt kernels of
function fields of quadrics, very little progress has been made over the last 40 years, with
Fitzgerald’s theorem being among the few highlights. Our computations perhaps raise
some new questions here. For example, must q be divisible by an (s + 1)-fold Pfister
form in the situation of Corollary 1.4? Conjecturally, this question should have a positive
1Little seems to have been known beyond the fact that dim(q) ≥ 2s+1 in this case, which is an easy
consequence of the Cassels-Pfister subform theorem (see [Kne76, Lem. 4.5]).
3
answer in the case where q has degree s + 1, meaning here that q does not represent an
element in I s+2 (F ), the (s + 2)-nd power of the fundamental ideal of even-dimensional
forms in W (F ). We provide here some further evidence for this claim, including a proof for
the case where dim(p) ≤ 16 (Corollary 5.11). While it seems unlikely that such divisibility
would hold in general, we are currently unable to provide any counterexample.
Theorem 1.3 is a consequence of results of Vishik ([Vis07]) on a certain descent problem
for algebraic cycles over function fields of quadrics. The proof is given in §4 below. Beyond
this, we also prove Conjecture 1.1 in a number of additional cases; namely, the conjecture
is true if (i) 2s+1 − 2 ≤ dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , (ii) p is a Pfister neighbour, (iii) k ≤ 7, or (iv)
dim(q) ≤ 2s+2 + 2s−1 . In the case of (iii) and (iv), we again prove a stronger result at the
level of the splitting pattern of q (Theorem 5.3). In the course of treating case (iii), we
show that (a stronger version of) our conjecture is implied by a long-standing conjecture
of Kahn on the unramified Witt group of a quadric ([Kah95], see §5.B below).
We expect that the statement of Conjecture 1.1 is also true in characteristic 2, even if
we allow p and q to be degenerate.2 Unfortunately, the methods of the present article rely
on the action of mod-2 Steenrod operations on Chow groups of smooth projective varieties,
something which not available in characteristic 2 at the present time. Nevertheless, using
entirely different methods, we can show that our main results (and more) extend to the
case where char(F ) = 2 and q is quasilinear (i.e., diagonalizable). In view of the different
nature of the arguments used, this work has been confined to a separate text ([Scu17]).
We conclude this introduction with an example which shows that Conjecture 1.1 cannot
be improved without stronger hypotheses or permitting the use of additional invariants:
Example 1.5. Let p be an anisotropic quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over a field E
of characteristic 6= 2. Suppose that p is a neighbour of an (s + 1)-fold Pfister form π
for some non-negative integer s. Choose a non-negative integer a, a non-negative integer
k < 2s , and let ǫ = k − 2l for some integer 0 ≤ l ≤ k/2. Note that we have ǫ + l ≥ 0. Let
X = (X1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l ) be a set of a + ǫ + l algebraically independent variables over E, and
let F = E(X). Let σ be a codimension-l subform of π, and consider the form
q = πF ⊗ hX1 , . . . , Xa−1 i ⊥ Xa σF ⊥ hXa+1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l i.
Since F/E is a purely transcendental extension, πE and σE are anisotropic. It then follows
from [EKM08, Cor. 19.6] that q is anisotropic. Note that q has dimension a2s+1 + ǫ. We
claim that (qF (p) )an has dimension k. Since l ≤ k/2 < 2s−1 , σ is a neighbour of π. Let τ
be its complementary form of dimension l. Since π is a Pfister form, we then have
qF (p) = − Xa τ ⊥ hXa+1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l i F (p)
in W (F (p)). By Hoffmann’s Separation theorem, τE(p) is anisotropic, and since F (p)/E(p)
is purely transcendental, [EKM08, Cor. 19.6] then implies that the right-hand side of the
above equation is anisotropic. We therefore have that
(qF (p) )an ≃ − Xa τ ⊥ hXa+1 , . . . , Xa+ǫ+l i F (p) .
In particular, the dimension of (qF (p) )an is equal to
dim(τ ) + ǫ + l = 2l + ǫ = k,
as claimed. Since the integers k and ǫ in the statement of Conjecture 1.1 must have the
same parity, this shows the optimality of the assertion.
2Of course, if q is degenerate, then one can no longer interpret the integer k as the dimension of the
anisotropic part of qF (p) .
4
STEPHEN SCULLY
Before proceeding, we make the following conventions:
Conventions. All fields considered in this paper have characteristic 6= 2, and all quadratic forms are finite-dimensional and non-degenerate. By a variety, we mean an integral
separated scheme of finite-type over a field. The field of 2 elements is denoted by F2 .
2. Some preliminary facts and terminology
For the remainder of this text, F will denote an arbitrary field of characteristic 6= 2.
We assume basic familiarity with the algebraic theory of quadratic forms, and the reader
is referred to [EKM08] for all undefined terminology and notation.
2.A. The Knebusch splitting tower of a quadratic form. Let ϕ be a quadratic form
over F . Recall the following construction of Knebusch ([Kne76]): Set F0 = F , ϕ0 = ϕan
(the anisotropic the kernel of ϕ), and recursively define
Fr = Fr−1 (ϕr−1 )
and
ϕr = (ϕFr )an ,
with the understanding that the process stops at the first non-negative integer h(ϕ) for
which ϕh(ϕ) is split (i.e., of dimension at most 1). The integer h(ϕ) is called the height of ϕ.
By the splitting pattern of ϕ, we will mean the decreasing sequence of integers comprised
of the dimensions of the ϕr . For each 0 ≤ r ≤ h(ϕ), we set jr (ϕ) to be the Witt index of ϕ
after extension to the field Fr . If ϕ is not split and r ≥ 1, then the integer jr (ϕ) − jr−1 (ϕ)
is called the r-th higher Witt index of ϕ, and is denoted ir (ϕ). By [Kne76, Thm. 5.8],
the even-dimensional anisotropic forms of height 1 are precisely
Nthose which are similar
to a Pfister form, i.e., to a form of the shape hha1 , . . . , am ii := m
i=1 h1, −ai i. In view of
the inductive nature of Knebusch’s construction, it follows that if ϕ is non-split of even
dimension, then ϕh(ϕ)−1 is similar to an n-fold Pfister form for some positive integer n.
The latter integer is called the degree of ϕ, denoted deg(ϕ). If dim(ϕ) is odd (resp. if ϕ is
hyperbolic), then we set deg(ϕ) = 0 (resp. deg(ϕ) = ∞). By a deep result due to Orlov,
Vishik and Voevodsky ([OVV07, Thm. 4.3]), deg(ϕ) then coincides with the supremum
of the set of all integers d for which ϕ represents an element in the d-th power I d (F ) of
the fundamental ideal ideal in the Witt ring W (F ).
2.B. Stable birational equivalence of quadratic forms. Let ψ and ϕ be a pair of
anisotropic quadratic forms over F of dimension ≥ 2. We say that ϕ and ψ are stably
birationally equivalent if both ϕF (ψ) and ψF (ϕ) are isotropic. For example, an anisotropic
Pfister neighbour is stably birationally equivalent to its ambient Pfister form ([EKM08,
Rem. 23.11]). More generally, if ψ is similar to a subform of ϕ having codimension less
than i1 (ϕ), then ϕ and ψ are stably birationally equivalent (see [EKM08, Lem. 74.1]).
Following the previous example, we say in this case that ψ is a neighbour of ϕ.
2.C. Algebraic cycles on quadrics. Given a variety X over a field K, we will write
Ch(X) for its total Chow group modulo 2. The group Ch(X) has the natural structure
of an F2 -vector space. If L is a field extension of K, then an element of Ch(XL ) is
said to be K-rational if it lies in the image of the natural restriction homomorphism
Ch(X) → Ch(XL ). Suppose now that X is a smooth projective quadric of dimension
n ≥ 1 defined by the vanishing of a quadratic form ϕ over our fixed field F , and let F be
an algebraic closure of F . By [EKM08, Prop. 68.1], an F2 -basis of Ch(XF ) is given by the
set {li , hi | 0 ≤ i ≤ [n/2]}, where li (resp. hi ) is the class of an i-dimensional projective
linear subspace (resp. a codimension-i hyperplane section) of XF . The following lemma is
5
a basic consequence of the well-know theorem of Springer asserting that odd-degree field
extensions do not affect the Witt index of a quadratic form:
Lemma 2.1 (see [EKM08, Cor. 72.6]). Let ϕ be a quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over
F with associated (smooth) projective quadric X, and let 0 ≤ i ≤ [n/2]. If the element
li ∈ Ch(XF ) is F -rational, then iW (ϕ) > i.
2.D. The motivic decomposition type and upper motive of a quadric. Given a
field K, we will write Chow (K) for the additive category of Grothendieck-Chow motives
over K with integral coefficients (as defined in [EKM08, Ch. XII], for example). If X is a
smooth projective variety over K, then we will write M (X) for its motive considered as
an object of Chow (K). In the special case where X = Spec(K), we simply write Z instead
of M (X) (the dependency on the base field is suppressed from the notation). Given an
integer i and an object M of Chow (K), we will write M {i} for the i-th Tate twist of M .
In particular, Z{i} will denote the Tate motive with shift i in Chow (K). If L is a field
extension of K, we write ML to denote the image of an object M in Chow (K) under the
natural scalar extension functor Chow (K) → Chow (L).
Suppose now that X is a smooth projective quadric of dimension n ≥ 1 defined by
the vanishing
of a quadratic form ϕ over our fixed field F , and let Λ(n) = {i | 0 ≤ i ≤
`
[n/2]} {n − i | 0 ≤ i ≤ [n/2]}. By a result of Vishik (see [Vis04, §§3,4]), any direct
summand of M (X) decomposes (in an essentially unique way) into a finite direct sum of
indecomposable objects in Chow (F ). If N is a non-zero direct summand of
LM (X), then
∼
there exists a unique non-empty subset Λ(N ) ⊆ Λ(n) such that NF =
λ∈Λ(N ) Z{λ}
L
(loc. cit.). In particular, we have Λ M (X) = Λ(n), i.e., M (XF ) ≃ λ∈Λ(n) Z{λ}. Now,
if N1 and N2 are distinct indecomposable direct summands of M (X), then Λ(N1 ) and
Λ(N2 ) are easily seen to be disjoint ([Vis04, Lem. 4.2]), and so the complete motivic
decomposition of X determines in this way a partition of the set Λ(n). This partition
is an important discrete invariant of ϕ known as its motivic decomposition type. For the
reader’s convenience, we state here the most significant recent advance in the study of this
invariant due to Vishik ([Vis11]). Recall first that the upper motive of X is defined as the
unique indecomposable direct summand U (X) of M (X) such that 0 ∈ Λ(U (X)), i.e., such
that Z is isomorphic to a direct summand of U (X)F . We then have:
Theorem 2.2 (see [Vis11, Thm. 2.1]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over F with associated (smooth) projective quadric X. Write
dim(ϕ) − i1 (ϕ) = 2r1 − 2r2 + · · · + (−1)t−1 2rt
for uniquely determined integers r1 > r2 > · · · > rt−1 > rt +1 ≥ 1, and, for each 1 ≤ c ≤ t,
set
t
c−1
X
X
i−1 ri −1
(−1) 2
+ ǫ(c)
(−1)j−1 2rj ,
Dc =
i=1
j=l
where ǫ(c) = 1 if c is even and ǫ(c) = 0 if c is odd. Then, for any 1 ≤ c ≤ t, we have
Dc ∈ Λ(U (X)), i.e., the Tate motive Z{Dc } is isomorphic to a direct summand of U (X)F .
3. Hyperbolicity of quadratic forms over function fields of quadrics
The proof of Theorem 1.3 will be given in the next section. Taking this for granted, we
give here the basic applications to the study of Witt kernels of function fields of quadrics.
We start by recalling the statement of the Cassels-Pfister subform theorem:
6
STEPHEN SCULLY
Proposition 3.1 (see [Kne76, Lem. 4.5]). Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms
of dimension ≥ 2 over F such that qF (p) is hyperbolic. Then, for any non-zero elements
a ∈ D(p) and b ∈ D(q), there exists a quadratic form r over F such that q ≃ r ⊥ abp. In
particular, dim(p) ≤ dim(q).
Taking degrees into account, the dimension inequality can be refined as follows:
Corollary 3.2. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms over F such that qF (p) is
hyperbolic, and let n = deg(q). Then dim(p) ≤ 2n .
Indeed, this follows from the proposition by taking L to be the penultimate entry of the
Knebusch splitting tower of q in the following lemma:
Lemma 3.3. Let q and p be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F such
that qF (p) is hyperbolic, and let L be a field extension of F . If qL is not hyperbolic, then
pL is anisotropic, and (qL )an becomes hyperbolic over L(p).
Proof. It is clear that (qL )an becomes hyperbolic over L(p). If pL is isotropic, then L(p)
is a purely transcendental extension of L ([EKM08, Prop. 22.9]) and so qL must already
be hyperbolic.
3.A. Main result. The statement of Corollary 3.2 can be reformulated as follows: If
qF (p) is hyperbolic, then the last higher Witt index of q is equal to 2m for some m ≥ s.
The new insight here is that the remaining higher Witt indices are all divisible by 2s+1 :
Theorem 3.4. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F ,
and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . If qF (p) is
hyperbolic, then ir (q) is divisible by 2s+1 for every 1 ≤ r < h(q).
Proof. Since the statement is insensitive to multiplying p and q by non-zero scalars, we
can assume that both forms represent 1. We argue by induction on h(q). If h(q) = 1,
there is nothing to prove, so assume otherwise. Then, by Lemma 3.3, pF (q) is anisotropic
and q1 becomes hyperbolic over F (q)(p). The induction hypothesis therefore implies that
ir (q) = ir−1 (q1 ) is divisible by 2s+1 for all 1 < r < h(q). It remains to show that i1 (q)
is also divisible by 2s+1 . We begin by showing that i1 (q) > 2s . Suppose, for the sake of
contradiction, that this is not the case. Since both p and q represent 1, it follows from
the Cassels-Pfister subform theorem (Proposition 3.1 above) that there exists a quadratic
form r over F such that
q ≃ r ⊥ p.
(3.1)
We recall the following observation due to Gentile and Shapiro:
Lemma 3.5 ([GS78, Lem. 17]). Let L be a field extension of F . In the above situation,
either
(1) (qL )an ≃ (rL )an ⊥ (pL )an , or
(2) (rL )an ≃ (qL )an ⊥ −(pL )an .
Proof. Both (1) and (2) are true if we replace the isometry relation with Witt equivalence.
In particular, (2) holds if either qL is hyperbolic or (qL )an ⊥ −(pL )an is anisotropic. If not,
then pL is anisotropic and (qL )an becomes hyperbolic over L(p) (Lemma 3.3). At the same
time, (qL )an and pL represent a common non-zero element of L, and so pL ⊂ (qL )an by the
Cassels-Pfister subform theorem. By Witt cancellation, it then follows that (1) holds.
We apply this lemma in the case where L = F (q). Note first that since dim(p) > 2s , r
has codimension > 2s in q. Since i1 (q) ≤ 2s , it follows from [Vis04, Cor. 4.9] that rF (q) is
anisotropic. As pF (q) is also anisotropic, the lemma therefore tells us that either
7
(1) q1 ≃ rF (q) ⊥ pF (q) , or
(2) rF (q) ≃ q1 ⊥ −pF (q) .
Now (1) cannot hold, since the right-hand side has dimension equal to dim(q), which is
larger than dim(q1 ). On the other hand, (2) cannot hold either; indeed, if (2) holds, then
dim(q) − dim(q1 )
2
dim(r) + dim(p) − dim(r) − dim(p)
=
2
= dim(p) > 2s ,
i1 (q) =
which contradicts our assumption. We therefore conclude that i1 (q) > 2s . By Karpenko’s
theorem on the possible values of the first higher Witt index ([Kar03]), it follows that
dim(q) − i1 (q) is divisible by 2s+1 . Now the k = 0 case of Theorem 1.3 tells us that dim(q)
is divisible by 2s+1 , and so the same is therefore true of i1 (q).
In particular, we get the following more precise version of Corollary 1.4:
Corollary 3.6. Let q and p be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F , let
s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let n = deg(q). If
qF (p) is hyperbolic, then n ≥ s + 1, and:
(1) If n = s + 1, then dim(q) = 2s+1 m for some odd integer m.
(2) If n ≥ s + 2, then dim(q) is divisible by 2s+2 .
Remark 3.7. We remind the reader that, by [OVV07, Thm. 4.3], n = deg(q) coincides
with the largest integer d such that [q] ∈ I d (F ).
Proof. The inequality n ≥ s + 1 holds by Corollary 3.2. In view of the fact that
h(q)−1
n
dim(q) = 2 +
X
2ir (q),
(3.2)
r=1
the remaining statements follow immediately from Theorem 3.4.
Now, the following statement is well known (see [Vis04, Lem. 6.2] for a proof):
Proposition 3.8. Let q be an anisotropic quadratic form over F which is divisible by
an m-fold Pfister form for some integer m ≥ 1. Then ir (q) is divisible by 2m for all
1 ≤ r < h(q).
Theorem 3.4 therefore raises the following question:
Question 3.9. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F ,
and let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . If qF (p) is
hyperbolic, does it follow that q is divisible by an (s + 1)-fold Pfister form?
While it perhaps seems unlikely that this would hold in general, we are unable to provide
a counterexample. At the same time, we do expect that the question has a positive answer
in the case where deg(q) takes its smallest possible value of s+1. In fact, the hyperbolicity
of qF (p) should imply that p is a Pfister neighbour in this case; by [AP71], this would give
that q is isometric to the product of an odd-dimensional form and the ambient Pfister
form of p. This expectation goes back to Fitzgerald ([Fit83]), and we provide further
evidence in its favour in §5 below. In particular, we show that if deg(q) = s + 1 and qF (p)
is hyperbolic, then the upper motive of the quadric {p = 0} is a twisted form of a Rost
motive (Corollary 5.11). By a result of Karpenko ([Kar01]), this implies that our claim
holds if s ≤ 3. Hypothetically, it should imply for all s ([Vis04, Conj. 4.21]).
8
STEPHEN SCULLY
3.B. Fitzgerald’s theorem revisited. The proof of Corollary 3.6 immediately yields
the following lower bound for the dimension of an element of the Witt kernel W (F (p)/F ):
Corollary 3.10. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F , let
s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 , and let n = deg(q). If
qF (p) is hyperbolic, then n ≥ s + 1 and
dim(q) ≥ 2n + (h(q) − 1)2s+2 ,
with equality holding if and only if ir (q) = 2s+1 for all 1 ≤ r < h(q).
In particular, we get a satisfying explanation of Fitzgerald’s theorem on the lowdimensional part of W (F (p)/F ):
Corollary 3.11 (Fitzgerald, [Fit81, Thm. 1.6]). Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic
forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F such that qF (p) is hyperbolic, and let n = deg(q). If
dim(p) > 12 (dim(q) − 2n ), then q is similar to a Pfister form.
Proof. To say that q is similar to a Pfister form is equivalent to saying that h(q) = 1
([Kne76, Thm. 5.8]). Let s be the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤
2s+1 . Then, by hypothesis, we have
dim(q) < 2n + 2dim(p) ≤ 2n + 2s+2 .
By Corollary 3.10, it follows that h(q) = 1, as desired.
Remark 3.12. As noted by Fitzgerald (see [Fit81, §2]), the inequality of Corollary 3.11
cannot be weakened in general. Here we can clarify the situation further: Let p and q
be as in the statement of Corollary 3.10. If we are in the border case where dim(p) =
1
n
n
s+2 and dim(p) = 2s+1 .
2 (dim(q)−2 ), then our result shows that h(q) = 2, dim(q) = 2 +2
By a theorem of Vishik ([Vis04, Thm. 6.4]), any degree-n form of height ≥ 2 has dimension
≥ 2n + 2n−1 . We therefore have n − 3 ≤ s ≤ n − 1. All three cases can occur. In fact, q
should, in this situation, be the product of an (s+1)-fold Pfister form and either an Albert
form (if s = n − 3), a 4-dimensional form of non-trivial discriminant (if s = n − 2) or a
form of dimension 3 (if s = n − 1) – see [Kah96, §2.4]. This has been shown to be the case
when n ≤ 3 (loc. cit.), and can also be proven for n = 4 using more recent results (though
this is absent from the literature). The general case remains out of reach at present.
4. Proof of Theorem 1.3
In this section, we give a concrete geometric reformulation of Conjecture 1.1. Theorem
1.3 then follows as a consequence of the results of [Vis07]. We begin by making the
following observation:
Lemma 4.1. Let d, k and s be positive integers. Assume that d + k is even and that
k < 2s . Then the following are equivalent:
(1) d = a2s+1 + ǫ for some non-negative integer a and some integer −k ≤ ǫ ≤ k.
s
(2) d+k
2 = a2 + µ for some non-negative integer a and some integer 0 ≤ µ ≤ k.
(3) The binomial coefficient
d+k
2
l
(
2s − 2
is even for every k < l ≤ m, where m =
2s−1
if k ≥ 2s−1
if k < 2s−1 .
9
Proof. The equivalence of (1) and (2) is clear. To prove the equivalence of (2) and (3),
we need to recall the basic
for oddness of binomial coefficients. Let x be a nonP criterion
i be its 2-adic expansion. We write π(x) for the (finite)
negative integer, and let ∞
x
2
i=0 i
set of all non-negative integers i for which xi is non-zero. We then have:
Lemma 4.2 (see [Spr98,
Lem. 3.4.2]). Let x and y be non-negative integers. Then the
binomial coefficient xy is odd if and only if π(y) ⊂ π(x).
Returning to the proof of Lemma 4.1, let us write
d+k
= a2s + µ
2
for some non-negative integer a and some integer 0 ≤ µ < 2s . If 0 ≤ l < 2s , then Lemma
4.2 implies that
d+k
µ
2
≡
(mod 2).
l
l
The equivalence (2) ⇔ (3) therefore amounts to the assertion that µ ≤ k if and only if µl
is even for every k < l ≤ m. The “only if” implication
here is trivial. Conversely, suppose
that µl is even for every k < l ≤ m. Since µµ = 1, it follows that either µ ≤ k or µ > m.
If µ > m, then (by the definition of m) we either have
(i) µ = 2s − 1, or
(ii) k < 2s−1 = m < µ.
s
By Lemma 4.2, 2 −1
is odd for every 0 ≤ l ≤ 2s−1 , so if (i) holds, then we must have
l
µ
s
that k = 2 − 1 = m. If (ii) holds, then 2s−1
is even by hypothesis. On the other hand,
s−1
s
the inequalities 2 < µ < 2 imply in this case that s − 1 ∈ π(µ). By Lemma 4.2, this
µ
is odd, giving us a contradiction. We conclude that µ ≤ k, and so the
means that 2s−1
equivalence of (2) and (3) is proved.
Lemma 4.1 reduces Conjecture 1.1 to the problem of checking the parity of certain
binomial coefficients. The point now is that these coefficients can be extracted from the
action of the Steenrod algebra on the mod-2 Chow ring of the quadric defined by q. For
the remainder of this section, let p and q be anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2
over F , and let Q be the projective quadric of equation q = 0. We fix an algebraic closure
F (resp. F (p)) of F (resp. F (p)). For any j ≥ 0, let S j denote the j-th Steenrod operation
of cohomological type on the mod-2 Chow ring of a smooth quasi-projective variety.
Lemma 4.3. Fix integers 0 ≤ r ≤ [dim(Q)/2] and 0 ≤ j ≤ r. Then the element S j (lr ) ∈
Ch(QF ) is F -rational if and only if the binomial coefficient
dim(q) − r − 1
dim(q) − r − 1 − j
is even.
Proof. By [EKM08, Cor. 78.5], we have
dim(q) − r − 1
j
S (lr ) =
lr−j .
j
If S j (lr ) is F -rational, then the coefficient here must be even by Lemma 2.1 (because q is
anisotropic). The converse is trivial.
If Y is a variety over F , then an element α ∈ Ch(YF ) will be called F (p)-rational if
αF (p) ∈ Ch(YF (p) ) is F (p)-rational. We recall the following result of Vishik (extended to
odd characteristic in [Fin13]):
10
STEPHEN SCULLY
Theorem 4.4 ([Vis07, Cor. 3.5], [Fin13, Thm. 1.1, Prop. 2.1]). Let Y be a smooth
quasi-projective variety over F , and let α be an F (p)-rational element of Chm (YF ). If the
integral Chow group CH(YF ) is torsion-free, then:
(1) S j (α) is F -rational for every j > m − [(dim(p) − 1)/2].
(2) If pF (Y ) is not split, then S j (α) is also F -rational for j = m − [(dim(p) − 1)/2].
Applying Theorem 4.4 to the quadric Q, we get the following:
Corollary 4.5. Let r = iW (qF (p) ) − 1, and consider the element lr ∈ Ch(QF ). Then:
(1) S j (lr ) is F -rational for all j > dim(Q) − r − [(dim(p) − 1)/2].
(2) If pF (q) is not split, then S j (lr ) is also F -rational for j = dim(Q) − r − [(dim(p) −
1)/2]
Proof. Since r = iW (qF (p) ) − 1, the element lr is F (p)-rational. As it is represented by a
cycle of dimension r, the assertions follow immediately from Vishik’s theorem.
Now, as in the statement of Conjecture 1.1, let k = dim(q) − 2iW (qF (p) ) (i.e., let k be
the dimension of the anisotropic part of qF (p) ).
Corollary 4.6. The binomial coefficient
dim(q)+k
2
l
is even for all k < l ≤ [(dim(p) − 1)/2] (and also for l = [(dim(p) − 1)/2] + 1 if pF (q) is
not split).
Proof. To simplify the notation, let n = [(dim(p) − 1)/2]. Let r = iW (qF (p) ) − 1, and let
dim(Q) − r − n ≤ j ≤ r. If j = dim(Q) − r − n, assume additionally that pF (q) is not split.
Then, by Corollary 4.5, S j (lr ) is F -rational. Since j ≤ r, Lemma 4.3 then implies that
the binomial coefficient
dim(q) − r − 1
dim(q) − r − 1 − j
is even. It now only remains to observe that
dim(q) + k
,
dim(q) − r − 1 =
2
and that
dim(Q) − r − n ≤ j ≤ r
if and only if
k < dim(q) − r − 1 − j ≤ n + 1.
This yields Theorem 1.3, as well as some other cases of Conjecture 1.1:
Theorem 4.7. Conjecture 1.1 is true in the following cases:
(1) The case where k < 2s−1 .
(2) The case where 2s+1 − 2 ≤ dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 .
(3) The case where p is a Pfister neighbour.
Proof. Let p, q, s and k be as in the statement of Conjecture 1.1, and let
(
2s − 2 if k ≥ 2s−1
m=
2s−1
if k < 2s−1 .
11
By Lemma 4.1, the statement of the conjecture holds for the pair (p, q) if and only if
dim(q)+k
2
l
is even for every k < l ≤ m. Corollary 4.5 shows that this holds in both cases (1) and (2).
Finally, suppose that p is a Pfister neighbour with ambient Pfister form π. Since p and
π are stably birationally equivalent (see §2.B), we have iW (qF (π) ) = iW (qF (p) ). To prove
that the statement of the conjecture holds in this case, we can therefore replace p by π and
assume that p is a Pfister form. In particular, we can assume that dim(p) = 2s+1 . The
validity of the conjecture in this case therefore follows from its validity in case (2).
Further partial results towards Conjecture 1.1 will be given in the next section, but the
case where k ≥ 2s−1 remains open in general. From the above arguments, it is easy to
see that we have the following reformulation of the conjecture as a refinement of [Vis07,
Thm. 3.1] for quadrics. The details are left to the reader:
Proposition 4.8. The following are equivalent:
(1) Conjecture 1.1 is true.
(2) Let p be an anisotropic quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2 over F , and let s be the
unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 . Let Y be a (possibly
isotropic) smooth projective F -quadric. If α ∈ Chm (YF ) is F (p)-rational, then
S j (α) is F -rational for all j ≥ m − (2s − 2).
5. Additional results
In this section, we provide further justification for Conjecture 1.1 beyond Theorem 1.3.
First, we prove that the conjecture holds under a certain assumption on the splitting
pattern of q. We then explain how the remaining cases would follow if a related, but
rather stronger conjecture of Kahn on the unramified Witt ring of a quadric were true.
This approach reveals that, in analogy with Theorem 3.4, Conjecture 1.1 should extend to
a statement at the level of the splitting pattern of q. We begin by stating this extension.
5.A. A refinement of the main conjecture. Let p and q be anisotropic quadratic
forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F , and let k = dim(q) − 2iW (qF (p) ) (i.e., k is the dimension
of the anisotropic part of qF (p)). By [Kne76, §5], k is equal to the dimension of q or one
of its higher anisotropic kernels. We can therefore propose the following:
Conjecture 5.1. In the above situation, let 0 ≤ l ≤ h(q) be such that dim(ql ) = k.
Suppose that k < 2s , where s is the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤
2s+1 . Then, for each 0 ≤ r < l, there exist integers ar , br ≥ 1 and −k ≤ ǫr ≤ k such that
(1) dim(qr ) = 2s+1 ar + ǫr .
(2) With one possible exception, either ir+1 (q) ≤ 12 (k+ǫr ) or ir+1 (q) = br 2s+1 +ǫr . The
exception is where dim(qr ) = 2s+1 − k, in which case r = l − 1 and ir+1 (q) = 2s − k.
Remark 5.2. If k = 0 (i.e., if qF (p) is hyperbolic), then l = h(q) − 1, and this is just
Theorem 3.4. In general, the exceptional case of (2) corresponds to the case of Theorem
3.4 in which deg(q) = s + 1, so that ih(q) (q) is not divisible by 2s+1 (being equal to 2s ).
Observe that, for k < 2s , Conjecture 1.1 correponds to assertion (1) of Conjecture 5.1
in the case where r = 0 (of course, Conjecture 1.1 is vacuously true if k ≥ 2s ). We will
prove here the following:
Theorem 5.3. Conjecture 5.1 (and hence Conjecture 1.1) is true if either
12
STEPHEN SCULLY
(1) k ≤ 7.
(2) dim(q) ≤ 2s+2 + k.
The first case, in particular, implies that both our conjectures hold if dim(p) ≤ 16. The
proof of Theorem 5.3 is given in §5.C below. Case (2) is treated using a motivic argument
which in fact gives more (Theorem 5.8). Case (1), on the other hand, is treated by relating
Conjecture 5.1 to Theorem 3.4 and the aforementioned conjecture of Kahn. We we now
explain, this approach more clearly illustrates the philosophy underlying this paper.
5.B. A conjecture of Kahn. Let ϕ be an anisotropic quadratic form of dimension ≥ 2
over F . Recall that the unramified Witt ring of the projective quadric {ϕ = 0}, denoted
Wnr (F (ϕ)), is defined as the subring of W (F (ϕ)) consisting of those classes of anisotropic
quadratic forms which have no non-trivial (second) residues at the codimension-1 points of
the projective quadric {ϕ = 0} (see [Kah95]). The image of the canonical scalar extension
map W (F ) → W (F (ϕ)) trivially lies in Wnr (F (ϕ)), but equality need not hold in general
(see, e.g., [KRS98, Cor. 10]). Nevertheless, Kahn has made the following strong conjecture
concerning the “low-dimensional” part of Wnr (F (ϕ)):
Conjecture 5.4 (Kahn, [Kah95, Conj. 1]). Let ϕ be an anisotropic quadratic form over
F and let [τ ] ∈ Wnr (F (ϕ)). If dim(τ ) < 12 dim(ϕ), then τ is defined over F , i.e., there
exists a quadratic form σ over F such that τ ≃ σF (ϕ) .
If true, this has the following application to Conjecture 5.1:
Proposition 5.5. Assume in the situation of Conjecture 5.1 that dim(ql−1 ) > 2k. Then,
(qF (p) )an is defined over F provided that Conjecture 5.4 holds whenever dim(τ ) ≤ k and
dim(ϕ) ≥ dim(ql−1 ).
Proof. Let (Fr ) be the Knebusch splitting tower of q. The form ql is evidently unramified at
the codimension-1 points of the quadric {ql−1 = 0}. Since dim(ql ) = k and dim(ql−1 ) > 2k,
our hypothesis implies that ql ≃ τFl for some form τ over Fl−1 . If l > 1, then τ is unramified
at the codimension-1 points of X = {ql−2 = 0}. Indeed, since ql ≃ τFl , Corollary 3.2
implies that [τ ⊥ −ql−1 ] ∈ I n (Fl−1 ), where 2n ≥ dim(ql−1 ) > 2k. Thus, if x ∈ X (1) , and
π is a uniformizer for OX,x , we have (using [EKM08, Lem. 19.14])
∂x,π ([τ ]) = ∂x,π ([τ ⊥ −ql−1 ]) ∈ ∂x,π I n (Fl−1 ) ⊆ I n−1 (Fl−2 (x)).
But dim(τ ) = k, and since 2n−1 > k, the Arason-Pfister Hauptsatz ([AP71]) then implies
that ∂x,π ([τ ]) = 0. Again, our hypothesis now gives that ql is defined over Fl−2 . Continuing
in this way, we see that ql is defined over F , say ql ≃ σFl . We claim that (qF (p) )an ≃ σF (p) .
Since dim(σ) = k = dim((qF (p) )an ), it suffices to show that (q ⊥ −σ)F (p) is hyperbolic.
But (q ⊥ −σ)Fl (p) is hyperbolic, and so, by [EKM08, Lem. 7.15], it only remains to observe
that Fl (p) is a purely transcendental extension of F (p). But if r < l, then the form qr
becomes isotropic over Fr (p) by the very definition of k. Hence Fr+1 (p) = Fr (p)(qr ) is a
purely transcendental extension of Fr (p), and so the claim follows by an easy induction.
If one assumes another related conjecture of Vishik, then one can go a bit further here
(see Remark 5.13 (2)). In any case, the philosophy underlying Conjecture 5.1 is now clear:
If qF (p) is “nearly hyperbolic”, then its anisotropic part should typically be defined over
F , and the necessary conclusions can be made using Theorem 3.4. In more details:
Lemma 5.6. Conjecture 5.1 is true in the case where (qF (p) )an is defined over F .
13
Proof. By an easy induction on l, it suffices to show that if l > 0, then dim(q) and
i1 (q) have the prescribed form. Assume that (qF (p) )an ≃ σF (p) for some form σ over
F , and let η = (q ⊥ −σ)an . Since both q and σ are anisotropic, there exists an integer
0 ≤ λ ≤ dim(σ) = k, and codimension-λ subforms qe ⊂ q and σ
e ⊂ σ such that η ≃ qe ⊥ −e
σ.
In particular, setting ǫ = 2λ − k, we have dim(q) = dim(η) + ǫ. Now, by construction, η
becomes hyperbolic over F (p). Thus, by Corollary 3.6, we have dim(η) = 2s+1 a for some
a ≥ 1 (and also deg(η) ≥ s+1). We therefore have dim(q) = 2s+1 a+ǫ. As for the assertion
regarding i1 (q), we may assume that i1 (q) > (k + ǫ)/2 = λ, so that qe is a neighbour of q
in the sense of §2.B above. This implies, in particular, that q and qe are stably birationally
equivalent. If η is similar to an (s + 1)-fold Pfister form, then the Cassels-Pfister subform
theorem implies that q is a subform of η, whence η ≃ q ⊥ −σ by Witt cancellation.
Since dim(σ) = k < 2s , q is then a neighbour of η, and so i1 (q) = 2s − k by [Vis04, Cor.
4.9]. Otherwise, Theorem 3.4 implies that i1 (η) = 2s+1 b for some b ≥ 1. Again, since
dim(e
σ ) < 2s , it follows that qe is a neighbour of η. As q is a neighbour of qe, we see that q
and η are stably birationally equivalent, and so i1 (q) = i1 (η) + dim(q) − dim(η) = 2s+1 b + ǫ
by another application of [Vis04, Cor. 4.9]. This proves the lemma.
5.C. Proof of Theorem 5.3. For the remainder of the paper, we fix the following notation:
• q and p are anisotropic quadratic forms of dimension ≥ 2 over F .
• Q and P denote the (smooth) projective quadrics defined by the vanishing of q
and p, respectively.
• s is the unique non-negative integer such that 2s < dim(p) ≤ 2s+1 .
• k := dim(q) − 2iW (qF (p) ) (i.e., k is the dimension of the anisotropic part of qF (p)).
• l is the unique integer in [0, h(q)] such that dim(ql ) = k.
• i := iW (qF (p) ).
We now proceed with the proof of Theorem 5.3. We begin by showing that Conjecture
5.1 is true provided that 2s+1 − k lies in the splitting pattern of q. To make this more
precise, we note the following:
Lemma 5.7. Assume, in the situation of Conjecture 5.1, that l ≥ 1 (i.e, that qF (p) is
isotropic). Then dim(ql−1 ) = 2N − k for some integer N ≥ s + 1.
Proof. Let (Fr ) be the Knebusch splitting pattern of q. Since ql−1 becomes isotropic over
Fl−1 (p), and since dim(p) > 2s , Hoffmann’s Separation theorem ([Hof95, Thm. 1]) implies
that dim(ql−1 ) > 2s . In particular, dim(ql−1 ) = 2N − m for some integers N ≥ s + 1 and
0 ≤ m < 2N −1 . By definition, we then have i1 (ql−1 ) = 12 (2N − m − k), so that
1
dim(ql−1 ) − i1 (ql−1 ) = (2N − m + k) > 2N −2 (remember that k < 2s ).
2
By Karpenko’s theorem on the possible values of the first Witt index ([Kar03]), it follows
that 2N −1 divides m − k. Since both both m and k are strictly less than 2N −1 , this implies
that m = k, and so dim(ql−1 ) = 2N − k.
Our result is now that Conjecture 5.1 holds in the case where N = s + 1:
Theorem 5.8. Assume that l ≥ 1 (i.e., that qF (p) is isotropic). If dim(ql−1 ) = 2s+1 − k,
then Conjecture 5.1 is true.
Proof. The proof is similar to that of [Scu16, Thm. 4.1], and begins with the following
observation regarding the motivic decomposition of the quadric Q:
14
STEPHEN SCULLY
Lemma 5.9. In the situation of Theorem 5.8, U (P ){i − 1} is isomorphic to a direct
summand of M (Q).
Proof. By [Vis04, Thm. 4.15], it suffices to check that for every field extension L of F ,
we have iW (pL ) > 0 ⇔ iW (qL ) ≥ i. The left to right implication is immediate; indeed,
if pL is isotropic, then L(p) is a purely transcendental extension of L, and so iW (qL ) =
iW (qL(p) ) ≥ iW (qF (p) ) = i. For the other implication, assume that iW (qL ) ≥ i. If (Fr )
denotes the Knebusch splitting tower of q, then it follows from the very definition of l that
the free composite Fl · L is a purely transcendental extension of L (compare the end of
the proof of Proposition 5.5). To show that iW (pL ) > 0, it therefore suffices to show that
p becomes isotropic over Fl . Note first that, by hypothesis, we have
1
(dim(ql−1 ) − dim(ql ))
2
1
= (2s+1 − k) − (2s+1 − 2k) = 2s .
2
On the other hand, the form ql−1 becomes isotropic over Fl−1 (p). Since dim(p) > 2s ,
and since Fl = Fl−1 (ql−1 ), the desired assertion thus follows from Izhboldin’s “strong
incompressibility” theorem ([Izh00, Thm. 0.2]).
dim(ql−1 ) − i1 (ql−1 ) = dim(ql−1 ) −
The proof of Theorem 5.8 now proceeds by induction on l, with the case where l = 1
being trivial. Indeed, if l = 1, then dim(q) = 2s+1 − k and i1 (q) = (dim(q) − k)/2 = 2s − k.
Assume now that l ≥ 2 (in particular, h(q) ≥ 2). Applying the induction hypothesis to
the pair (q1 , pF (q) ), we immediately get that the integers dim(qr ) and ir+1 (q) have the
prescribed form for all 1 ≤ r < l. In particular, we have dim(q1 ) = 2s+1 a1 + ǫ1 for some
a1 ≥ 1 and −k ≤ ǫ1 ≤ k. Since dim(q) = dim(q1 ) + 2i1 (q), we then have
k − ǫ1
1
s
.
(5.1)
i = (dim(q) − k) = 2 a1 + i1 (q) −
2
2
It still remains show that dim(q) and i1 (q) are as claimed. We separate two cases:
Case 1. i1 (q) ≤ (k − ǫ1 )/2. In this case, the assertions are clear. Indeed, we have
2s+1 a1 + ǫ1 = dim(q1 ) < dim(q)
= dim(q1 ) + 2i1 (q)
≤ dim(q1 ) + (k − ǫ1 ) = 2s+1 a1 + k.
Since −k ≤ ǫ1 ≤ k, this shows that dim(q) = 2i+1 a1 + ǫ0 for some −k < ǫ0 ≤ k, and we
then have
ǫ0 − ǫ1
k + ǫ0
dim(q) − dim(q1 )
=
≤
.
i1 (q) =
2
2
2
Case 2. i1 (q) > (k − ǫ1 )/2. In this case, let u denote the smallest non-negative integer
such that 2u ≥ i1 (q). By Karpenko’s theorem on the possible values of the first Witt index
([Kar03]), the integer dim(q) − i1 (q) is divisible by 2u . Since dim(q) = dim(q1 ) + 2i1 (q), it
follows that
2s+1 a1 + ǫ1 + i1 (q) ≡ 0 (mod 2u ).
(5.2)
We claim that u > i. Suppose that this is not the case. Then (5.2) implies that i1 (q) =
2u µ − ǫ1 for some integer µ. Now, by hypothesis (and the fact that ǫ1 ≥ −k), we have
i1 (q) + ǫ1 >
k + ǫ1
k − ǫ1
+ ǫ1 =
≥ 0,
2
2
15
and so µ > 0. At the same time, we have 2u µ ≤ 2s . Indeed, since 2u ≥ i1 (q), the inequality
2u µ > 2s would imply that
ǫ1 = 2u µ − i1 (q) ≥ 2s ,
which is not the case (since ǫ1 ≤ k < 2s ). The situation is thus as follows: We have
dim(q) − i1 (q) = dim(q1 ) + i1 (q) = 2s+1 a1 + 2u µ,
2u µ
2s .
(5.3)
2s+1 a1
where a1 ≥ 1 and 0 <
≤
Now the integer
can be written in the form
r
r
r
r
w
1
2
w−1
2 −2 +···+2
− 2 for some integers r1 > r2 > · · · > rw ≥ s + 1, while 2u µ can be
r
r
w+1
w+2
written as 2
−2
+ · · · + (−1)t−1 2rt for unique integers s ≥ rw+1 > rw+2 > · · · >
rt−1 > rt + 1 ≥ 1. Equation 5.3 can therefore be re-written as
dim(q) − i1 (q) = (2r1 − 2r2 + · · · + 2rw−1 − 2rw ) + 2rw+1 − 2rw+2 + · · · + (−1)t−1 2rt .
|
{z
} |
{z
}
2s+1 a1
2u µ
2u µ
2s
Unless
=
and rw = s + 1, this is precisely the presentation of dim(q) − i1 (q) as
an alternating sum of 2-powers appearing in the statement of Vishik’s Theorem 2.2. If
2u µ = 2s and rw = s + 1, then the needed presentation is
dim(q) − i1 (q) = (2r1 − 2r2 + · · · + 2rw−1 ) −2s .
{z
}
|
2s+1 (a1 +1)
Either way, see that the Tate motive Z{2s a1 } is isomorphic to a direct summand of U (Q)F .
Indeed, this follows by applying Vishik’s Theorem with c = w + 1 in the first case, and
with c = w in the second. Let j = i1 (q) − 1 − (k − ǫ1 )/2. Since i1 (q) > (k − ǫ1 )/2, we
then have 0 ≤ j < i1 (q). Thus, by [Vis11, Cor. 3.10], U (Q){j} is isomorphic to a direct
summand of M (Q). By the preceding discussion, Z{2s a1 + j} is isomorphic to a direct
summand of U (Q){j}F . But
2s a1 + j = 2s a1 + i1 (q) − (k − ǫ1 )/2 − 1 = i − 1
by equation (5.1). In view of Lemma 5.9, we thus see that there are two indecomposable direct summands of M (Q) containing the Tate motive Z{i − 1} in their respective
decompositions over F , namely, U (Q){j} and U (P ){i − 1}. As result, we must have
U (Q){j} ∼
= U (P ){i − 1} (see §2.D above). In particular, we have j = i − 1. Since
j < i1 (q), and since i > 0, this implies that i = i1 (q). In other words, it implies that l = 1,
which provides us with the needed contradiction to our supposition. We can therefore
conclude that u > s, i.e., that i1 (q) > 2s . By (5.2), it follows that i1 (q) = 2s+1 b0 − ǫ1 for
some positive integer b0 . Moreover, we then have
dim(q) = dim(q1 ) + 2i1 (q) = 2s+1 (a1 + 2b0 ) − ǫ1 .
Since −k ≤ ǫ1 ≤ k, this proves the theorem.
Let us note that the proof of Theorem 5.8 allows us to extract more information. Recall
that a direct summand N in the motive of a smooth projective F -quadric is said to be
binary if NF is isomorphic to a direct sum of two Tate motives. We then have:
Proposition 5.10. If k < 2s−1 + 2s−2 and dim(ql−1 ) = 2s+1 − k, then the upper motive
U (P ) of the quadric P is binary.
Proof. By Lemma 5.9, U (P ){i − 1} is isomorphic to a direct summand of M (Q). Since
i − 1 = jl (q) − 1, it follows from [Vis11, Thm. 4.13] that N := U (P ){jl−1 (q)} is also
isomorphic to a direct summand of M (Q). By an argument identical to that given in
[Vis11, Proof of Thm. 7.7], it follows that N , and hence U (P ), is binary provided that
ir (q) < il (q) for all r > l. But il (q) = (dim(ql−1 ) − k)/2 = 2s − k > 2s−2 by hypothesis, and
16
STEPHEN SCULLY
so it only remains to note that ir (q) ≤ 2s−2 for all r > l. Indeed, if dim(qr−1 ) ≤ 2s−1 , then
this is trivial; otherwise, our hypothesis again implies that 2s−1 < dim(qr−1 ) < 2s−1 + 2s−2
and so the claim follows from Hoffmann’s Separation theorem (see [Hof95, Cor. 1]).
As conjectured by Vishik (cf. [Vis11, Conj. 4.21]), the upper motive of an anisotropic
projective quadric over a field of characteristic 6= 2 should be binary only when its underlying quadratic form is a Pfister neighbour (the converse being a well-known result of Rost
([Ros90, Prop. 4])). Significant evidence for the validity of this assertion has been given
in [IV00, §6]. Moreover, in [Kar01], Karpenko showed that Vishik’s conjecture holds for
forms of dimension ≤ 16. Applying this to the special case where k = 0 and deg(q) = s+1,
we get the following result promised in §3.A above:
Corollary 5.11. If qF (p) is hyperbolic and deg(q) = s + 1, then:
(1) The upper motive U (P ) of the quadric P is binary.
(2) If s ≤ 3 (i.e., dim(p) ≤ 16), there exists an (s + 1)-fold Pfister form π and an
odd-dimensional form r such that q ≃ π ⊗ r. Moreover, p is a neighbour of π.
Proof. The first statement is the k = 0 case of Proposition 5.10. The second statement
then follows from the aforementioned result of Karpenko together with [EKM08, Cor.
23.6]. More precisely, Karpenko showed in [Kar01] that if the upper motive of P is binary,
and dim(p) ∈ {3, 5, 9}, then p is a Pfister neighbour. But this implies the same assertion
in all dimensions ≤ 16 by [IV00, Thm. 6.1] and [Vis04, Cor. 3.9, Cor. 4.7].
We can now give the proof of Theorem 5.3:
Proof of Theorem 5.3. We may assume that l ≥ 1, since otherwise there is nothing to
prove. If dim(ql−1 ) = 2s+1 − k, then Conjecture 5.1 holds by Theorem 5.8. Thus, by
Lemma 5.7, we can assume that dim(ql−1 ) ≥ 2s+2 − k. Now, if dim(q) ≤ 2s+2 + k, then we
obviously have dim(ql−1 ) = 2s+2 − k, and the assertions of Conjecture 5.1 hold trivially.
This takes care of case (2) of the theorem. It now remains to treat the case where k ≤ 7.
As dim(ql−1 ) ≥ 2s+2 − k, Proposition 5.5 and Lemma 5.6 show that it suffices to know
that Kahn’s Conjecture 5.4 holds in the following cases:
(i) dim(τ ) ∈ {0, 1}, dim(ϕ) ≥ 7.
(ii) dim(τ ) ∈ {2, 3}, dim(ϕ) ≥ 13.
(iii) dim(τ ) ∈ {4, 5, 6, 7}, dim(ϕ) ≥ 25.
But all these cases of Kahn’s conjecture are already known to be true: for the cases where
dim(τ ) ≤ 5, see [Kah95, Thm. 2]; for the case where dim(τ ) = 6, see [Lag99, Thm.
principale], and for the case where dim(τ ) = 7, see [IV00, Thm. 3.9].
Corollary 5.12. Conjecture 1.1 holds if dim(q) ≤ 2s+1 + 2s−1 .
Proof. If k ≥ 2s−1 , apply 5.3; otherwise, apply Theorem 1.3.
Remarks 5.13. (1) Laghribi ([Lag99, Théorème principale]) has shown that if dim(ϕ) > 16,
then Conjecture 5.4 also holds for some special classes of 8, 9 and 10-dimensional forms τ .
This permits to extend Theorem 5.3 to the case where k ∈ {8, 9, 10} under some additional
assumptions on q. We refrain from going into the details here.
(2) Conjecturally, the form (qF (p) )an should be defined over F in the situation of Conjecture 5.1 provided that either (i) k < 2s−1 + 2s−2 or (ii) l ≥ 1 and dim(ql−1 ) 6= 2s+1 − k.
Indeed, that the second condition should be enough is implicit in our proof of Theorem
5.3. As for the first condition, we may additionally assume in this case that l ≥ 1 and
dim(ql−1 ) = 2s+1 − k. By Proposition 5.10, this ensures that the upper motive of P
17
is binary. According to [Vis04, Conj. 4.21], this should in turn imply that p is a Pfister neighbour. By replacing p by its ambient Pfister form, we could then assume that
dim(p) = 2s+1 > 2k, and so the claim would follow directly from Conjecture 5.4.
Acknowledgements. I would like to thank Alexander Vishik for helpful comments.
The support of a PIMS postdoctoral fellowship and NSERC discovery grant during the
preparation of this article is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[AP71] J.K. Arason and A. Pfister Beweis des Krullschen Durchschnittsatzes für den
Wittring. Invent. Math. 12 (1971), 173–176.
[EKM08] R. Elman, N. Karpenko, and A. Merkurjev. The algebraic and geometric theory
of quadratic forms. AMS Colloquium Publications 56, American Mathematical
Society, 2008.
[EL72] R. Elman and T.Y. Lam. Pfister forms and K-theory of fields. J. Algebra 23
(1972), 181–213.
[GS78] E. Gentile and D. Shapiro. Conservative quadratic forms. Math. Zeit. 163
(1978), 15–23.
[Gro61] A. Grothendieck. Éléments de géométrie algébrique (rédigés avec la collaboration de Jean Dieudonné): II. Étude globale élémentaire de quelques classes de
morphismes. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHÉS 8 (1961), 5–222.
[Fin13] R. Fino. Around rationality of cycles. Cent. Eur. J. Math. 11 (2013), no. 6,
1068-1077.
[Fit81] R.W. Fitzgerald. Function fields of quadratic forms. Math. Z. 178 (1981), no.
1, 63–76.
[Fit83] R.W. Fitzgerald. Witt kernels of function field extensions. Pacific J. Math. 109
(1983), no. 1, 89–106.
[Hof95] D.W. Hoffmann. Isotropy of quadratic forms over the function field of a quadric.
Math. Z. 220 (1995), no. 3, 461–476.
[Izh00] O. Izhboldin. Motivic equivalence of quadratic forms. II. Manuscripta Math.
102 (2000), no. 1, 41–52.
[Izh01] O. Izhboldin. Fields of u-invariant 9. Ann. of Math. (2) 154 (2001), no. 3,
529–587.
[IV00] O. Izhboldin and A. Vishik. Quadratic forms with absolutely maximal splitting. Quadratic forms and their applications (Dublin, 1999), 103–125, Contemp.
Math. 272, Amer. Math. Soc., 2000.
[Kah95] B. Kahn. A descent problem for quadratic forms. Duke Math. J. 80 (1995), no.
1, 139–155.
[Kah96] B. Kahn. Formes quadratiques de hauteur et de degré 2. Indag. Math. (N.S.) 7
(1996), no. 1, 47–66.
[KRS98] B. Kahn, M. Rost and R. Sujatha. Unramified cohomology of quadrics. I. Amer.
J. Math. 120 (1998), no. 4, 841–891.
[Kar01] N.A. Karpenko. Characterization of minimal Pfister neighbors via Rost projectors. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 160 (2001), no. 2-3, 195–227.
[Kar03] N.A. Karpenko. On the first Witt index of quadratic forms. Invent. Math. 153
(2003), no. 2, 455–462.
[KM03] N. Karpenko and A. Merkurjev. Essential dimension of quadrics. Invent. Math.
153 (2003), no. 2, 361–372.
18
STEPHEN SCULLY
[Kne76] M. Knebusch. Generic splitting of quadratic forms. I. Proc. London Math. Soc.
(3) 33 (1976), no. 1, 65–93.
[Kne77] M. Knebusch. Generic splitting of quadratic forms. II. Proc. London Math. Soc.
(3) 34 (1977), no. 1, 1–31.
[Lag99] A. Laghribi. Sur le problème de descente des formes quadratiques. Arch. Math.
(Basel) 73 (1999), no. 1, 18–24.
[Lag05] A. Laghribi. Witt kernels of function field extensions in characteristic 2. J. Pure
Appl. Algebra 199 (2005), no. 1-3, 167–182.
[Mer91] A.S. Merkurjev. Simple algebras and quadratic forms. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR
Ser. Mat. 55 (1991), no. 1, 218–224.
[OVV07] D. Orlov, A. Vishik, and V. Voevodsky, An exact sequence for K∗M /2 with
applications to quadratic forms. Ann. of Math. 165 (2007), 1–13.
[Ros90] M. Rost. Some new results on the Chow groups of quadrics. Preprint, 1990.
[Scu16] S. Scully. A bound for the index of a quadratic form after scalar extension to
the function field of a quadric. Preprint, 2016, arXiv:1607.07529v1.
[Scu17] S. Scully. Quasilinear quadratic forms and function fields of quadrics. Preprint,
2017, Available on the author’s webpage.
[Spr98] T.A. Springer. Linear Algebraic Groups. Second edition. Progress in Mathematics, 9. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1998.
[Vis04] A. Vishik. Motives of quadrics with applications to the theory of quadratic forms.
Geometric methods in the algebraic theory of quadratic forms, 25–101, Lecture
Notes in Math. 1835, Springer, 2004.
[Vis07] A. Vishik. Generic points of quadrics and Chow groups. Manuscr. Math. 122
(2007), no. 3, 365–374.
[Vis09] A. Vishik. Fields of u-invariant 2r + 1. Algebra, arithmetic and geometry: in
honor of Yu. I. Manin. Vol. II, 661–685, Progr. Math., 270, Birkhäuser Boston,
Inc., Boston, MA, 2009.
[Vis11] A. Vishik. Excellent connections in the motives of quadrics. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm.
Supér. (4) 44 (2011), no. 1, 183–195.
[Voe03] V. Voevodsky. Motivic cohomology with Z/2-coefficients. Publ. Math. Inst.
Hautes Études Sci. No. 98 (2003), 59–104.
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton
AB T6G 2G1, Canada
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Logical Methods in Computer Science
Vol. 8 (1:29) 2012, pp. 1–36
www.lmcs-online.org
Submitted
Published
Oct. 4, 2011
Mar. 26, 2012
ON IRRELEVANCE AND ALGORITHMIC EQUALITY IN
PREDICATIVE TYPE THEORY ∗
ANDREAS ABEL a AND GABRIEL SCHERER b
a
Department of Computer Science, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
e-mail address: [email protected]
b
Gallium team, INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt
e-mail address: [email protected]
Abstract. Dependently typed programs contain an excessive amount of static terms
which are necessary to please the type checker but irrelevant for computation. To separate static and dynamic code, several static analyses and type systems have been put
forward. We consider Pfenning’s type theory with irrelevant quantification which is compatible with a type-based notion of equality that respects η-laws. We extend Pfenning’s
theory to universes and large eliminations and develop its meta-theory. Subject reduction,
normalization and consistency are obtained by a Kripke model over the typed equality
judgement. Finally, a type-directed equality algorithm is described whose completeness is
proven by a second Kripke model.
1. Introduction and Related Work
Dependently typed programming languages such as Agda [BDN09], Coq [INR10], and Epigram [MM04] allow the programmer to express in one language programs, their types, rich
invariants, and even proofs of these invariants. Besides code executed at run-time, dependently typed programs contain much code needed only to please the type checker, which is
at the same time the verifier of the proofs woven into the program.
Program extraction takes type-checked terms and discards parts that are irrelevant for
execution. Augustsson’s dependently typed functional language Cayenne [Aug99] erases
types using a universe-based analysis. Coq’s extraction procedure has been designed by
Paulin-Mohring and Werner [PMW93] and Letouzey [Let02] and discards not only types
but also proofs. The erasure rests on Coq’s universe-based separation between propositional
(Prop) and computational parts (Set/Type). The rigid Prop/Set distinction has the drawback of code duplication: A structure which is sometimes used statically and sometimes
dynamically needs to be coded twice, once in Prop and once in Set.
An alternative to the fixed Prop/Set-distinction is to let the usage context decide
whether a term is a proof or a program. Besides whole-program analyses such as data
1998 ACM Subject Classification: F.4.1.
Key words and phrases: dependent types, proof irrelevance, typed algorithm equality, logical relation,
universal Kripke model.
∗
Revision and extension of FoSSaCS 2011 conference publication.
l
LOGICAL METHODS
IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
c
DOI:10.2168/LMCS-8 (1:29) 2012
CC
A. Abel and G. Scherer
Creative Commons
2
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
flow, some type-based analyses have been put forward. One of them is Pfenning’s modal
type theory of Intensionality, Extensionality, and Proof Irrelevance [Pfe01], later pursued
by Reed [Ree03], which introduces functions with irrelevant arguments that play the role of
proofs.1 Not only can these arguments be erased during extraction, they can also be disregarded in type conversion tests during type checking. This relieves the user of unnecessary
proof burden (proving that two proofs are equal). Furthermore, proofs can not only be
discarded during program extraction but directly after type checking, since they will never
be looked at again during type checking subsequent definitions.
In principle, we have to distinguish “post mortem” program extraction, let us call it
external erasure, and proof disposal during type checking, let us call it internal erasure.
External erasure deals with closed expressions, programs, whereas internal erasure deals
with open expressions that can have free variables. Such free variables might be assumed
proofs of (possibly false) equations and block type casts, or (possibly false) proofs of wellfoundedness and prevent recursive functions from unfolding indefinitely. For type checking
to not go wrong or loop, those proofs can only be externally erased, thus, the Prop/Set
distinction is not for internal erasure. In Pfenning’s type theory, proofs can never block
computations even in open expressions (other than computations on proofs), thus, internal
erasure is sound.
Miquel’s Implicit Calculus of Constructions (ICC) [Miq01a] goes further than Pfenning
and considers also parametric arguments as irrelevant. These are arguments which are irrelevant for function execution but relevant during type conversion checking. Such arguments
may only be erased in function application but not in the associated type instantiation.
Barras and Bernardo [BB08] and Mishra-Linger and Sheard [MLS08] have built decidable
type systems on top of ICC, but both have not fully integrated inductive types and types
defined by recursion (large eliminations). Barras and Bernardo, as Miquel, have inductive
types only in the form of their impredicative encodings, Mishra-Linger [ML08] gives introduction and elimination principles for inductive types by example, but does not show
normalization or consistency.
While Pfenning’s type theory uses typed equality, ICC and its successors interpret typed
expressions as untyped λ-terms up to untyped equality. In our experience, the implicit
quantification of ICC, which allows irrelevant function arguments to appear unrestricted in
the codomain type of the function, is incompatible with type-directed equality. Examples
are given in Section 2.3. Therefore, we have chosen to scale Pfenning’s notion of proof
irrelevance up to inductive types, and integrated it into Agda.
In this article, we start with the “extensionality and proof irrelevance” fragment of
Pfenning’s type theory in Reed’s version [Ree02, Ree03]. We extend it by a hierarchy of
predicative universes, yielding Irrelevant Intensional Type Theory IITT (Sec. 2). After
specifying a type-directed equality algorithm (Sec. 3), we construct a Kripke model for
IITT (Sec. 4). It allows us to prove normalization, subject reduction, and consistency, in
one go (Sec. 5). A second Kripke logical relation yields correctness of algorithmic equality
and decidability of IITT (Sec. 6). Our models are ready for data types, large eliminations,
types with extensionality principles, and internal erasure (Sec. 7).
1 Awodey and Bauer [AB04] give a categorical treatment of proof irrelevance which is very similar to
Pfenning and Reed’s. However, they work in the setting of Extensional Type Theory with undecidable type
checking, we could not directly use their results for this work.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
3
Contribution and Related Work. We consider the design of our meta-theoretic argument as technical novelty, although it heavily relies on previous works to which we owe
our inspiration. Allen [All87] describes a logical relation for Martin-Löf type theory with a
countable universe hierarchy. The seminal work of Coquand [Coq91] describes an untyped
equality check for the Logical Framework and justifies it by a logical relation for dependent
types that establishes subject reduction, normalization, completeness of algorithmic equality, and injectivity of function types in one go. However, his approach cannot be easily
extended to a typed algorithmic equality, due to problems with transitivity.
Goguen introduces Typed Operational Semantics [Gog94] to construct a Kripke logical
relation that simultaneously proves normalization, subject reduction, and confluence for a
variant of the Calculus of Inductive Constructions. From his results one can derive an equality check based on reduction to normal form. Goguen also shows how to derive syntactic
properties, such as closure of typing and equality under substitution, by a Kripke-logical
relation [Gog00].
Harper and Pfenning [HP05] popularize a type-directed equality check for the Logical
Framework that scales to extensionality for unit types. They prove completeness of algorithmic equality by a Kripke model on simple types which are obtained by erasure from the
dependent types. Erasure is necessary since algorithmic equality cannot be shown transitive
before it is proven sound; yet soundness hinges on subject reduction which rests on function
type injectivity which in turn is obtained from completeness of algorithmic equality—a vicious cycle. While erasure breaks the cycle, it also prevents types to be defined by recursion
on values (so-called large eliminations), a common feature of proof assistants like Agda,
Coq, and Epigram.
Normalization by evaluation (NbE) has been successfully used to obtain a type-directed
equality check based on evaluation in the context of dependent types with large eliminations
[ACD07]. In previous work [ACD08], the first author applied NbE to justify a variant of
Harper and Pfenning’s algorithmic equality without erasure. However, the meta-theoretic
argument is long-winded, and there is an essential gap in the proof of transitivity of the
Kripke logical relation.
In this work, we explore a novel approach to justify type-directed algorithmic equality
for dependent types with predicative universes. First, we show its soundness by a Kripke
model built on top of definitional equality. The Kripke logical relation yields normalization,
subject reduction, and type constructor injectivity, which also imply logical consistency of
IITT. Further, it proves syntactic properties such as closure under substitution, following
Goguen’s lead [Gog00]. The semantic proof of such syntactic properties relieves us from
the deep lemma dependencies and abundant traps of syntactic meta-theory of dependent
types [HP05, AC07]. Soundness of algorithmic equality entails transitivity (which is the
stumbling stone), paving the way to show completeness of algorithmic equality by a second
Kripke logical relation, much in the spirit of Coquand [Coq91] and Harper and Pfenning
[HP05].
This article is a revised and extended version of paper Irrelevance in Type Theory with
a Heterogeneous Equality Judgement presented at the conference FoSSaCS 2011 [Abe11].
Unfortunately, the conference version has inherited the above-mentioned gap [ACD08] in
the proof of transitivity of the Kripke logical relation. This is fixed in the present article
by an auxiliary Kripke model (Section 4). Further, we have dropped the heterogeneous
approach to equality in favor of a standard homogeneous one. Heterogeneous equality is
not necessary for the style of irrelevance we are embracing here.
4
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
2. Irrelevant Intensional Type Theory
In this section, we present Irrelevant Intensional Type Theory IITT which features two of
Pfenning’s function spaces [Pfe01], the ordinary “extensional” (x : U ) → T and the proof
irrelevant (x÷U ) → T . The main idea is that the argument of a (x÷U ) → T function is
counted as a proof and can neither be returned nor eliminated on, it can only be passed
as argument to another proof irrelevant function or data constructor. Technically, this is
realized by annotating variables as relevant, x : U , or irrelevant, x÷U , in the typing context,
to confine occurrences of irrelevant variables to irrelevant arguments.
Expression and context syntax. We distinguish between relevant (t : u or simply t u) and
irrelevant application (t ÷ u). Accordingly, we have relevant (λx : U. T ) and irrelevant abstraction (λx÷U. T ). Our choice of typed abstraction is not fundamental; a bidirectional
type-checking algorithm [Coq96] can reconstruct type and relevance annotations at abstractions and applications.
Var ∋ x, y, X, Y
Sort ∋ s
::= Setk (k ∈ N)
Ann ∋ ⋆
::= ÷ | :
universes
annotation: irrelevant, relevant
s,s′
Exp ∋ t, u, T, U ::= s | (x⋆U ) → T
sort, (ir)relevant function type
⋆
| x | λx⋆U. t | t u lambda-calculus
Cxt ∋ Γ, ∆
::= ⋄ | Γ. x⋆T
empty, (ir)relevant extension
Expressions are considered modulo α-equality, we write t ≡ t′ when we want to stress that t
and t′ identical (up to α). Similarly, we consider variables bound in a context to be distinct,
and when opening a term binder we will implicitly use α-conversion to add a fresh variable
in the context.
For technical reasons, namely, to prove transitivity (Lemma 4.3) of the Kripke logical
s,s′
relation in Section 4, we explicitly annotate function types (x⋆U ) → T with the sorts
s of domain U and s′ of codomain T . We may omit the annotation if it is inessential or
determined by the context of discourse. In case T does not mention x, we may write U → T
for (x : U ) → T .
Sorts. IITT is a pure type system (PTS) with infinite hierarchy of predicative universes
Set0 : Set1 : .... The universes are not cumulative. We have the PTS axioms Axiom =
{(Seti , Seti+1 ) | i ∈ N} and the rules Rule = {(Seti , Setj , Setmax(i,j) ) | i, j ∈ N}. As
is customary, we will write the side condition (s, s′ ) ∈ Axiom just as (s, s′ ) and likewise
(s1 , s2 , s3 ) ∈ Rule just as (s1 , s2 , s3 ). IITT is a full and functional PTS, which means that
for all s1 , s2 there is exactly one s3 such that (s1 , s2 , s3 ). There is no subtyping, so that
types—and thus, sorts—are unique up to equality. A proof of sort unicity might relieve us
from the sort annotation in function types, however, we obtain sort discrimination too late
in our technical development (Lemma 5.10).
Substitutions. Substitutions σ are maps from variables to expressions. We require that the
domain dom(σ) = {x | σ(x) 6= x} is finite. We write id for the identity substitution and [u/x]
for the singleton substitution σ such that σ(x) := u and σ(y) := y for y 6= x. Substitution
extension (σ, u/x) is formally defined as σ ⊎ [u/x]. Capture avoiding parallel substitution
of σ in t is written as juxtaposition tσ.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
5
Contexts. Contexts Γ feature two kinds of bindings, relevant (x : U ) and irrelevant (x ÷ U )
ones. The intuition, implemented by the typing rules below, is that only relevant variables
are in scope in an expression. Resurrection Γ÷ turns all irrelevant bindings (x ÷ T ) into the
corresponding relevant ones (x : T ) [Pfe01]. It is the tool to make irrelevant variables, also
called proof variables, available in proofs. The generalization Γ⋆ shall mean Γ÷ if ⋆ = ÷,
and just Γ otherwise. We write Γ.∆ for the concatenation of Γ and ∆; herein, we suppose
dom(Γ) ∩ dom(∆) = ∅.
Primitive judgements of IITT. The following three judgements are mutually inductively
defined by the rules given below and in Figure 1.
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢t:T
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
Context Γ is well-formed.
In context Γ, expression t has type T .
In context Γ, t and t′ are equal expressions of type T .
Derived judgements. To simplify notation, we introduce the following four abbreviations:
Γ
Γ
Γ
Γ
⊢t÷T
⊢ t = t′ ÷ T
⊢T
⊢ T = T′
iff
iff
iff
iff
Γ÷ ⊢ t : T,
Γ ⊢ t ÷ T and Γ ⊢ t′ ÷ T,
Γ ⊢ T : s for some s,
Γ ⊢ T = T ′ : s for some s.
Γ ⊢ t ⋆ T may mean Γ ⊢ t : T or Γ ⊢ t ÷ T , depending on the value of placeholder ⋆;
same for Γ ⊢ t = t′ ⋆ T . We sometimes write Γ ⊢ t, t′ ⋆ T to abbreviate the conjunction of
Γ ⊢ t ⋆ T and Γ ⊢ t′ ⋆ T . The notation Γ ⊢ T, T ′ is to be understood similarly.
2.1. Rules. Our rules for well-typed terms Γ ⊢ t : T extend Reed’s rules [Ree02] to PTS
style. There are only 6 rules; we shall introduce them one-by-one.
Variable rule. Only relevant variables can be extracted from the context.
⊢Γ
(x : U ) ∈ Γ
Γ ⊢x:U
There is no variable rule for irrelevant bindings (x ÷ U ) ∈ Γ, in particular, the judgement
x÷U ⊢ x : U is not derivable. This essentially forbids proofs to appear in relevant positions.
Abstraction rule. Relevant and irrelevant functions are introduced analogously.
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t : T
s,s′
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
Γ ⊢ λx⋆U. t : (x⋆U ) → T
To check a relevant function λx : U. t, we introduce a relevant binding x : U into the context
and continue checking the function body t. In case of an irrelevant function λx÷U. t, we
proceed with an irrelevant binding x ÷ U . This means that an irrelevant function cannot
computationally depend on its argument—it is essentially a constant function. In particular,
λx÷U. x is never well-typed.
s,s′
As a side condition, we also need to check that the introduced function type (x⋆U ) → T
is well-sorted; the rule is given below.
6
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Application rule.
Γ ⊢ t : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢u⋆U
⋆
Γ ⊢ t u : T [u/x]
This rule uses our overloaded notations for bindings ⋆, that can be specialized into two
different instances for relevant and irrelevant applications.
For relevant functions, we get the ordinary dependently-typed application rule:
Γ ⊢ t : (x : U ) → T
Γ ⊢u:U
Γ ⊢ t u : T [u/x]
When applying an irrelevant function, we resurrect the context before checking the function
argument.
Γ ⊢ t : (x÷U ) → T
Γ÷ ⊢ u : U
Γ ⊢ t ÷ u : T [u/x]
This means that irrelevant variables become relevant and can be used in u. The intuition is
that the application t ÷ u does not computationally depend on u, thus, u may refer to any
variable, even the “forbidden ones”. One may think of u as a proof which may refer to both
ordinary and proof variables.
For example, let Γ = f : (y÷U ) → U . Then the irrelevant η-expansion λx÷U. f ÷ x is
well-typed in Γ, with the following derivation:
Γ. x ÷ U ⊢ f : (y÷U ) → U
Γ. x : U ⊢ x : U
Γ. x ÷ U ⊢ f ÷ x : U
Γ ⊢ λx ÷ U. f ÷ x : (x÷U ) → U
Observe how the status of x changes for irrelevant to relevant when we check the argument
of f .
Sorting rules. These are the “Axioms” and the “Rules” of PTSs to form types.
⊢Γ
(s, s′ )
Γ ⊢ s : s′
Γ ⊢ U : s1
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T : s2
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T : s3
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
The rule for irrelevant function type formation follows Reed [Ree02].
Γ ⊢ U : s1
Γ. x÷U ⊢ T : s2
Γ ⊢ U : s1
Γ. x : U ⊢ T : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x÷U ) → T : s3
It states that the codomain of an irrelevant function cannot depend relevantly on the function argument. This fact is crucial for the construction of our semantics in Section 4. Note
that it rules out polymorphism in the sense of Barras and Bernado’s Implicit Calculus of
Constructions ICC∗ [BB08] and Mishra-Linger and Sheard’s Erasure Pure Type Systems
EPTS [MLS08]; the type (X÷Set0 ) → (x : X) → X is ill-formed in IITT, but not in ICC∗
or EPTS. In EPTS, there is the following rule:
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x÷U ) → T : s3
It allows the codomain T of an irrelevant function to arbitrarily depend on the function
argument x. This is fine in an erasure semantics, but incompatible with our typed semantics
in the presence of large eliminations; we will detail the issues in examples 2.3 and 2.8.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
7
Another variant is Pfenning’s rule for irrelevant function type formation [Pfe01].
Γ ⊢ U ÷ s1
Γ. x÷U ⊢ T : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x÷U ) → T : s3
It allows the domain of an irrelevant function to make use of irrelevant variables in scope.
It does not give polymorphism, e. g., (X÷Set0 ) → (x : X) → X is still ill-formed. However,
(X÷Set0 ) → (x÷X) → X would be well-formed. It is unclear how the equality rule for
irrelevant function types would look like—it is not given by Pfenning [Pfe01]. The rule
Γ ⊢ U = U ′ ÷ s1
Γ. x÷U ⊢ T = T ′ : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x÷U ) → T = (x÷U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
would mean that any two irrelevant function types are equal as long as their codomains are
equal—their domains are irrelevant. This is not compatible with our typed semantics and
seems a bit problematic in general.2
Type conversion rule. We have typed conversion, thus, strictly speaking, IITT is not a PTS,
but a Pure Type System with Judgemental Equality [Ada06].
Γ ⊢t:T
Γ ⊢ T = T′
Γ′ ⊢ t : T ′
Equality. Figure 1 recapitulates the typing rules and lists the rules to derive context wellformedness ⊢ Γ and equality Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T . Equality is the least congruence over the βand η-axioms. Since equality is typed we can extend IITT to include an extensional unit
type (Section 7). Let us inspect the congruence rule for application:
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢ u = u′ ⋆ U
Γ ⊢ t ⋆ u = t′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
In case of relevant functions (⋆ = :) we obtain the usual dependently-typed application rule
of equality. Otherwise, we get:
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : (x÷U ) → T
Γ÷ ⊢ u : U
Γ ⊢ t ÷ u = t′ ÷ u′ : T [u/x]
Γ ÷ ⊢ u′ : U
Note that the arguments u and u′ to the irrelevant functions need to be well-typed but not
related to each other. This makes precise the intuition that t and t′ are constant functions.
2.2. Simple properties of IITT. In the following, we prove two basic invariants of derivable IITT-judgements: The context is always well-formed, and judgements remain derivable
under well-formed context extensions (weakening).
Lemma 2.1 (Context well-formedness).
(1) If ⊢ Γ. x : U. Γ′ then Γ ⊢ U .
(2) If Γ ⊢ t : T or Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T then ⊢ Γ.
Proof. By a simple induction on the derivations.
2This is why Reed [Ree02] differs from Pfenning.
8
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
⊢Γ
Context well-formedness.
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢T
⊢ Γ. x⋆T
⊢⋄
Γ ⊢t:T
Typing.
⊢Γ
(s, s′ )
Γ ⊢ s : s′
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢ U : s1
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T : s3
(x : U ) ∈ Γ
Γ ⊢x:U
s,s′
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t : T
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
Γ ⊢ λx⋆U. t : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢ t : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢u⋆U
⋆
Γ ⊢ t u : T [u/x]
Γ ⊢t:T
Γ ⊢ T = T′
Γ′ ⊢ t : T ′
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
Equality.
Computation (β) and extensionality (η).
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t : T
Γ ⊢u⋆U
⋆
Γ ⊢ (λx⋆U. t) u = t[u/x] : T [u/x]
s,s′
Γ ⊢ t : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
Γ ⊢ t = λx⋆U. t ⋆ x : (x⋆U ) → T
Equivalence rules.
Γ ⊢t:T
Γ ⊢t=t:T
Compatibility rules.
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
Γ ⊢ t′ = t : T
Γ ⊢ U = U ′ : s1
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ t1 = t2 : T
Γ ⊢ t2 = t3 : T
Γ ⊢ t1 = t3 : T
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T = T ′ : s2
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T = (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
Γ ⊢ U = U ′ : s1
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t = t′ : T
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ λx⋆U. t = λx⋆U ′ . t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
Γ ⊢ u = u′ ⋆ U
Γ ⊢ t ⋆ u = t′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
Conversion rule.
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
Γ ⊢ T = T′
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T ′
Figure 1: Rules of IITT
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
9
It should be noted that we only prove the most basic well-formedness statements here.
One would expect that Γ ⊢ t : T or Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T also implies Γ ⊢ T , or that Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
implies Γ ⊢ t : T . This is true—and we will refer to these implications as syntactic
validity—but this cannot be proven without treatment of substitution, due to the typing
rule for application, which requires substitution in the type, and due to the equality rule
for a β-redex, which uses substitution in both term and type. Therefore, syntactic validity
is delayed until Section 4 (Corollary 4.17), where substitution will be handled by semantic,
rather than syntactic, methods.
Weakening. We can weaken a context Γ by adding bindings or making irrelevant bindings
relevant. Formally, we have an order on binding annotations, which is the order induced by
: ≤ ÷, and we define weakening by monotonic extension.
A well-formed context ⊢ ∆ extends a well-formed context ⊢ Γ, written ∆ ≤ Γ, if and
only if:
∀x ∈ dom(Γ), (x ⋆1 U ) ∈ Γ =⇒ (x ⋆2 U ) ∈ ∆ with ⋆1 ≤ ⋆2 .
Note that this allows to insert new bindings or relax existing ones at any position in Γ, not
just at the end.
Lemma 2.2 (Weakening). Let ∆ ≤ Γ.
(1) If ⊢ Γ.Γ′ and dom(∆) ∩ dom(Γ′ ) = ∅ then ⊢ ∆.Γ′ .
(2) If Γ ⊢ t : T then ∆ ⊢ t : T .
(3) If Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T ′ then ∆ ⊢ t = t′ : T .
Proof. Simultaneously by induction on the derivation. Let us look at some cases:
Case
⊢Γ
(s, s′ )
Γ ⊢ s = s : s′
By assumption ⊢ ∆, thus ∆ ⊢ s = s : s′ .
Case
(x : U ) ∈ Γ ⊢ Γ
Γ ⊢x=x:U
Since ∆ ≤ Γ we have (x : U ) ∈ ∆, thus ∆ ⊢ x = x : U .
Case
Γ ⊢ U = U ′ : s1
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T : s2
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t = t′ : T
s1 ,s2
Γ ⊢ λx⋆U. t = λx⋆U ′ . t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
W. l. o. g., x 6∈ dom(∆). By (1) and definition of context weakening, ∆ ≤ Γ implies
∆. x⋆U ≤ Γ. x⋆U , so all premises can be appropriately weakened by induction hypothesis.
2.3. Examples.
Example 2.3 (Relevance of types).
sionality principle.
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢ 1 : Seti
3
We can extend IITT by a unit type 1 with exten-
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢ () : 1
3Example suggested by a reviewer of this paper.
Γ ⊢t:1
Γ ⊢ t′ : 1
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : 1
10
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Typed equality allows us to equate all inhabitants of the unit type. As a consequence, the
Church numerals over the unit type all coincide, e. g.,
Γ ⊢ λf : 1 → 1. λx : 1. x
= λf : 1 → 1. λx : 1. f x : (1 → 1) → 1 → 1.
In systems with untyped equality, like ICC∗ and EPTS, these terms erase to untyped
Church-numerals λf λx.x and λf λx. f x and are necessarily distinguished.
If we trade the unit type for Bool or any other type with more than one inhabitant, the
two terms become different in IITT. This means that in IITT, types are relevant, and we
need to reject irrelevant quantification over types like in (X÷Set0 ) → (X → X) → X → X.
In IITT, the polymorphic types of Church numerals are (X : Seti ) → (X → X) → X → X.
Example 2.4 (Σ-types). IITT can be readily extended by weak Σ-types.
Γ ⊢ U : s1
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T : s2
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) × T : s3
Γ ⊢ u⋆U
Γ ⊢ t : T [u/x]
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) × T
Γ ⊢ (u, t) : (x⋆U ) × T
Γ ⊢ p : (x⋆U ) × T
Γ. x⋆U. y : T ⊢ v : V
Γ ⊢ let (x, y) = p in v : V
Γ ⊢u⋆U
Γ ⊢ t : T [u/x]
Γ. x⋆U. y : T ⊢ v : V
Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) × T
Γ ⊢ (let (x, y) = (u, t) in v) = v[u/x][t/y] : V
Additional laws for equality could be considered, like commuting conversions, or the identity
(let (x, y) = p in (x, y)) = p. The relevant form (x : U ) × T admits a strong version with
projections fst and snd and full extensionality p = (fst p, snd p) : (x : U ) × T . However,
strong irrelevant Σ-types (x÷U ) × T are problematic because of the first projection:
Γ ⊢ p : (x÷U ) × T
Γ ⊢ fst p ÷ U
With our definition of Γ ⊢ u ÷ U as Γ÷ ⊢ u : U , this rule is misbehaved: it allows us
get hold of an irrelevant value in a relevant context. We could define a closed function
π1 : (x÷U ) × 1 → U , and composing it with ( , ()) : (x÷U ) → (x÷U ) × 1 would give us
an identity function of type (x÷U ) → U which magically makes irrelevant things relevant
and IITT inconsistent. In this article, we will not further consider strong Σ-types with
irrelevant components; we leave the in-depth investigation to future work.
Example 2.5 (Squash type). The squash type ||T || was first introduced in the context
of NuPRL [CAB+ 86]; it contains exactly one inhabitant iff T is inhabited. Semantically,
one obtains ||T || from T by equating all of T ’s inhabitants. In IITT, we can define ||T || as
internalization of the irrelevance modality, as already suggested by Pfenning [Pfe01]. The
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
11
first alternative is via the weak irrelevant Σ-type.
|| || :
Seti → Seti
||T || := ( ÷T ) × 1
[]
[x]
:
(x÷T ) → ||T ||
:= (x, ())
sqelim (T : Seti ) (P : ||T || → Setj ) (f : (x÷T ) → P [x]) (t : ||T ||)
:
Pt
:= let (x, ) = t in f ÷ x
It is not hard to see that || || is a monad. All canonical inhabitants of ||T || are definitionally
equal:
Γ ⊢ t, t′ ÷ T
Γ ⊢ [t] = [t′ ] : ||T ||
This is easily shown by expanding the definition of [ ] and using the congruence rule for
pairs with an irrelevant first component.
However, we cannot show that all inhabitants of ||T || are definitionally equal, because
of the missing extensionality principles for weak Σ. Thus, the second alternative is to add
the squash type to IITT via the rules:
Γ ⊢ T : Seti
Γ ⊢ ||T || : Seti
Γ ⊢t÷T
Γ ⊢ [t] : ||T ||
Γ ⊢ t, t′ : ||T ||
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : ||T ||
Γ ⊢ t : ||T ||
Γ. x÷T ⊢ v : V
Γ ⊢ let [x] = t in v : V
Γ ⊢t÷T
Γ. x÷T ⊢ v : V
Γ ⊢ (let [x] = [t] in v) = v[t/x] : V
Our model (Section 4) is ready to interpret these rules, as well as normalization-by-evaluation
inspired models [ACP11].
Example 2.6 (Subset type). The subset type {x : U | T } is definable from Σ and squash
as (x : U ) × ||T ||.
To discuss the next example, we consider a further extension of IITT by Leibniz equality
and natural numbers:
a ≡ b : Seti
for A : Seti and a, b : A
refl
: a ≡ a for A : Seti and a : A
Nat
: Seti
0, 1, . . . : Nat
+, ∗
: Nat → Nat → Nat.
Example 2.7 (Composite). 4 Let the set of composite numbers {4, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, . . . }
be numbers that are the product of two natural numbers ≥ 2.
Composite = {n : Nat | (k : Nat) × (l : Nat) × (n ≡ (k + 2) ∗ (l + 2))}
Most composite numbers have several factorizations, and thanks to irrelevance the specific
composition is ignored when handling composite numbers. For instance, 12 as product of 3
and 4 is not distinguished from the 12 as product of 2 and 6.
(12, [(1, (2, refl))]) = (12, [(0, (4, refl))]) : Composite.
4Example suggested by reviewer.
12
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Example 2.8 (Large eliminations). 5 The ICC∗ [BB08] or EPTS [MLS08] irrelevant function type (x ÷ A) → B allows x to appear relevantly in B. This extra power raises some
issues with large eliminations. Consider
T
: Bool → Set0
T true = Bool → Bool
T false = Bool
t
= λF : (b÷Bool) → (T b → T b) → Set0 .
λg : (F ÷ false (λx : Bool. x)) → Bool.
λa : F ÷ true (λx : Bool → Bool.λy : Bool. x y). g a.
The term t is well-typed in ICC∗ + T because the domain type of g and the type of a are
βη-equal after erasure (−)∗ of type annotations and irrelevant arguments:
(F ÷ false (λx : Bool. x))∗ = F (λxx)
=βη F (λxλy. x y) = (F ÷ true (λx : Bool → Bool.λy : Bool. x y))∗
While a Curry view supports this, it is questionable whether identity functions at different
types should be viewed as one. It is unclear how a type-directed equality algorithm (see
Sec. 3) should proceed here; it needs to recognize that x : Bool is equal to λy : Bool. x y :
Bool → Bool. This situation is amplified by a unit type 1 with extensional equality. When
we change T true to 1 and the type of a to F ÷ true (λx : 1. ()) then t should still type-check,
because λx. () is the identity function on 1. However, η-equality for 1 cannot be checked
without types, and a type-directed algorithm would end up checking (successfully) x : Bool
for equality with () : 1. This algorithmic equality cannot be transitive, because then any
two booleans would be equal.
Summarizing, we may conclude that the type of F bears trouble and needs to be
rejected. IITT does this because it forbids the irrelevant b in relevant positions such as
T b; ICC∗ lacks T altogether. Extensions of ICC∗ should at least make sure that b is never
eliminated, such as in T b. Technically, T would have to be put in a separate class of recursive
functions, those that actually compute with their argument. We leave the interaction of
the three different function types to future research.
3. Algorithmic Equality
The algorithm for checking equality in IITT is inspired by Harper and Pfenning [HP05].
Like theirs, it is type-directed, but we are using the full dependent type and not an erasure
to simple types (which would anyway not work due to large eliminations). We give the
algorithm in form of judgements and rules in direct correspondence to a functional program.
Algorithmic equality is meant to be used as part of a type checking algorithm. It is
the algorithmic counterpart of the definitional conversion rule; in particular, it will only be
called on terms that are already know to be well-typed – in fact, types that are well-sorted.
We rely on this precondition in the algorithmic formulation.
Algorithmic equality consists of three interleaved judgements. A type equality test
checks equality between two types, by inspecting their weak head normal forms. Terms
found inside dependent types are reduced and the resulting neutral terms are compared by
structural equality. The head variable of such neutrals provides type information that is
5Inspired by discussions with Ulf Norell during the 11th Agda Implementers’ Meeting.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
13
then used to check the (non-normal) arguments using type-directed equality, by reasoning on
the (normalized) type structure to perform η-expansions on product types. After enough
expansions, a base type is reached, where structural equality is called again, or a sort, at
which we use type equality.
Informally, the interleaved reductions are the algorithmic counterparts of the β-equality
axiom, the type and structural equalities account for the compatibility rules, and typedirected equality corresponds to the η-equality axiom. The remaining equivalence rules are
emergent global properties of the algorithm.
Weak head reduction. Weak head normal forms (whnfs) are given by the following grammar:
Whnf ∋ a, b, f, A, B, F
Wne ∋ n, N
s,s′
::= s | (x⋆U ) → T | λx⋆U. t | n
::= x | n ⋆ u
whnf
neutral whnf
Weak head evaluation t ց a and active application f @⋆ u ց a are functional relations
given by the following rules.
tցf
f @⋆ u ց a
t ⋆u ց a
aցa
t[u/x] ց a
(λx⋆U. t) @⋆ u ց a
n @⋆ u ց n ⋆ u
Instead of writing the propositions t ց a and P [a] we will sometimes simply write P [↓t].
Similarly, we might write P [f @⋆ u] instead of f @⋆ u ց a and P [a]. In rules, it is understood
that the evaluation judgement is always an extra premise, never an extra conclusion.
Algorithmic equality is given as type equality, structural equality, and type-directed
equality, which are mutually recursive. The equality algorithm is only invoked on wellformed expressions of the correct type.
Type equality. Type equality ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ , for weak head normal forms, and ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b
′
T , for arbitrary well-formed types, checks that two given types are equal in their respective
contexts.
∆ ⊢ N ←→
b N′ : T
∆ ⊢ ↓T ⇐⇒ ↓T ′
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
∆ ⊢ N ⇐⇒ N ′
∆ ⊢ U ⇐⇒
b U′
∆ ⊢ s ⇐⇒ s
∆. x : U ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
s,s′
s,s′
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T ⇐⇒ (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′
Note that when invoking structural equality on neutral types N and N ′ , we do not care
which type T is returned, since we know by well-formedness that N and N ′ must have the
same sort.
Structural equality. Structural equality ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : A and ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : T checks the
neutral expressions n and n′ for equality and at the same time infers their type, which is
returned as output.
∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : T
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : ↓T
(x : T ) ∈ ∆
∆ ⊢ x ←→
b x:T
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : (x : U ) → T
∆ ⊢ u ⇐⇒
b u′ : U
∆ ⊢ n u ←→
b n′ u′ : T [u/x]
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : (x÷U ) → T
∆ ⊢ n ÷ u ←→
b n′ ÷ u′ : T [u/x]
14
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Type-directed equality. Type-directed equality ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A and ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T checks
′
terms t and t for equality and proceeds by the structure of the supplied type, to account
for η.
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : ↓T
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T
∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x ⇐⇒
b t′ ⋆ x : T
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
∆ ⊢ ↓t ←→
b ↓t′ : T
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒ T ′ : s
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : N
Note that in the but-last rule we do not check that the inferred type T of ↓t equals the
ascribed type N . Since algorithmic equality is only invoked for well-typed t, we know that
this must always be the case. Skipping this test is a conceptually important improvement
over Harper and Pfenning [HP05].
Due to dependent typing, it is not obvious that algorithmic equality is symmetric and
transitive. For instance, consider symmetry in case of application: We have to show that
∆ ⊢ n′ u′ ←→
b n u : T [u/x], but using the induction hypothesis we obtain this equality only
at type T [u′ /x]. To conclude, we need to convert types, which is only valid if we know
that u and u′ are actually equal. Thus, we need soundness of algorithmic equality to show
its transitivity. Soundness w. r. t. declarative equality requires subject reduction, which is
not trivial, due to its dependency on function type injectivity. In the next section (4),
we construct by a Kripke logical relation which gives us subject reduction and soundness
of algorithmic equality (Section 5), and, finally, symmetry and transitivity of algorithmic
equality.
A simple fact about algorithmic equality is that the inferred types are unique up to
syntactic equality (where we consider α-convertible expressions as identical). Also, they
only depend on the left hand side neutral term n.
Lemma 3.1 (Uniqueness of inferred types).
(1) If ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n1 : A1 and ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n2 : A2 then A1 ≡ A2 .
(2) If ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n1 : T1 and ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n2 : T2 then T1 ≡ T2 .
Extending structural equality to irrelevance, we let
∆÷ ⊢ n ←→ n : A
∆÷ ⊢ n′ ←→ n′ : A
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ ÷ A
′
and analogously for ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n ÷ T.
4. A Kripke Logical Relation for Soundness
In this section, we construct a Kripke logical relation in the spirit of Goguen [Gog00]
and Vanderwaart and Crary [VC02] that proves weak head normalization, function type
injectivity, and subject reduction plus syntactical properties like substitution in judgements
and syntactical validity. As an important consequence, we obtain soundness of algorithmic
equality w. r. t. definitional equality. This allows us to establish that algorithmic equality
on well-typed terms is a partial equivalence relation.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
15
4.1. An Induction Measure. Following Goguen [Gog94] and previous work [ACD08], we
first define a semantic universe hierarchy Ui whose sole purpose is to provide a measure for
defining a logical relation and proving some of its properties. The limit Uω corresponds to
the proof-theoretic strength or ordinal of IITT.
We denote sets of expressions by A, B and functions from expressions to sets of expressions by F. Let Ab = {t | ↓t ∈ A} denote the closure of A by weak head expansion. The
b f @ u ∈ F(u)}.
dependent function space is defined as Π A F = {f ∈ Whnf | ∀u ∈ A.
By recursion on i ∈ N we define inductively sets Ui ⊆ Whnf × P(Whnf) as follows
[ACD08, Sec. 5.1]:
(N, Wne) ∈ Ui
(Setj , Seti ) ∈ Axiom
(Setj , |Uj |) ∈ Ui
cj
b (T [u/x], F(u)) ∈ U
(U, A) ∈ Ubi
∀u ∈ A.
(Seti , Setj , Setk ) ∈ Rule
((x⋆U ) → T, Π A F) ∈ Uk
Herein, Ubi = {(T, A) | (↓T, A) ∈ Ui } and |Uj | = {A | (A, A) ∈ Uj for some A}. Only
interested in computational strength, we treat relevant and irrelevant function spaces alike—
at the level of predicates A, irrelevance is anyhow not observable, only by relations as given
later.
The induction measure A ∈ Seti shall now mean the minimum height of a derivation of
(A, A) ∈ Ui for some A. Note that due to universe stratification, A ∈ Seti is smaller than
Seti ∈ Setj .
4.2. A Kripke Logical Relation. Let ∆ ⊢ t :=: t′ ⋆ T stand for the conjunction of the
propositions
• ∆ ⊢ t ⋆ T and ∆ ⊢ t′ ⋆ T , and
• ∆ ⊢ t = t′ ⋆ T .
By induction on A ∈ s we define two Kripke relations
∆ ⊢ A s A′ : s
∆ ⊢ a s a′ : A.
b and the generalization to ⋆. For better readability,
together with their respective closures s
the clauses are given in rule form meaning that the conclusion is defined as the conjunction
of the premises. ∀ and =⇒ are meta-level quantification and implication, respectively.
∆ ⊢ N :=: N ′ : s
∆ ⊢ N s N′ : s
∆ ⊢ n :=: n′ : N
∆ ⊢ n s n′ : N
⊢∆
(s, s′ )
∆ ⊢ s s s : s′
b U ′ : s1
∆ ⊢U s
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s
b T ′ [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s1 ,s2
s
,s
1 2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T :=: (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T s (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b f ′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f :=: f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f s f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
16
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
tցa
T ցA
∆ ⊢T =A
∆ ⊢t=a:A
∆ ⊢ t′ = a′ : A
∆ ⊢ a s a′ : A
∆ ⊢ t :=: t′ : T
b t′ : T
∆ ⊢ts
∆÷ ⊢ a s a : A
∆÷ ⊢ a′ s a′ : A
∆ ⊢ a s a′ ÷ A
b t:T
∆÷ ⊢ t s
t ′ ց a′
b t′ : T
∆ ÷ ⊢ t′ s
b t′ ÷ T
∆ ⊢ts
It is immediate that the logical relation contains only well-typed and definitionally equal
terms. We will demonstrate that it is also closed under weakening and conversion, symmetric
and transitive.
Lemma 4.1 (Weakening).
(1) If ∆ ⊢ a s a′ : A and Γ ≤ ∆ then there exists a derivation of Γ ⊢ a s a′ : A with the
same height.
b t′ : T .
(2) Analogously for ∆ ⊢ t s
Proof. By induction on A ∈ s and T ∈ s, resp.
Lemma 4.2 (Type conversion).
(1) If Γ ⊢ A s A′ : s then Γ ⊢ a s a′ : A iff Γ ⊢ a s a′ : A′ .
b T ′ : s then Γ ⊢ t s
b t′ : T iff Γ ⊢ t s
b t′ : T ′ .
(2) If Γ ⊢ T s
Proof. Simultaneously induction in A ∈ s and T ∈ s, resp. We show the “if” direction, the
“only if” follows analogously. The interesting case is the one of functions.
Case
b U ′ : s1
∆ ⊢U s
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s
b T ′ [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T :=: (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T s (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b f ′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f :=: f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f s f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
First, ∆ ⊢ f :=: f ′ : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ , holds because of the conversion rule for typing and
b u′ ⋆ U ′ and show Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b
equality. Now assume arbitrary Γ ≤ ∆ and Γ ⊢ u s
′
⋆
′
′
′
b u ⋆ U , thus,
f u : T [u/x]. By induction hypothesis on U ∈ s1 we have Γ ⊢ u s
⋆
′
⋆
′
b
Γ ⊢ f u s f u : T [u/x] by assumption. By induction hypothesis on T [u/x] ∈ s2 we
b f ′ ⋆ u′ : T ′ [u/x].
obtain Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b T : s.
Lemma 4.3 (Symmetry and Transitivity). Let ∆ ⊢ T s
b t′ : T then ∆ ⊢ t′ s
b t : T.
(1) If ∆ ⊢ t s
b t2 : T and ∆ ⊢ t2 s
b t3 : T then ∆ ⊢ t1 s
b t3 : T .
(2) If ∆ ⊢ t1 s
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
17
Proof. We generalize the two statements to whnfs ∆ ⊢ A s A : s and prove all four
statements simultaneously by induction in A ∈ s and T ∈ s, resp.
Case Let us look at the case for functions.
b U : s1
∆ ⊢U s
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s
b T [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T :=: (x⋆U ) → T : s3
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T s (x⋆U ) → T : s3
Case Symmetry:
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b f ′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
′
∆ ⊢ f :=: f : (x⋆U ) → T
∆ ⊢ f s f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
b u⋆U
To show ∆ ⊢ f ′ s f : (x⋆U ) → T , assume arbitrary Γ ≤ ∆ and Γ ⊢ u′ s
′
⋆
′
⋆
′
b
and show Γ ⊢ f u s f u : T [u /x]. By induction hypothesis on U ∈ s2 , with
b U : s1 , we have Γ ⊢ u s
b u′ ⋆ U , thus, Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u s
b f ′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
weakened Γ ⊢ U s
b u ⋆ U,
by assumption. Using symmetry and transitivity on U we obtain Γ ⊢ u s
b
thus, Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s T [u/x] : s2 . By induction hypothesis on T [u/x] ∈ s2 we apply
b f ⋆ u : T [u/x], and since Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s
b T [u′ /x] : s2
symmetry to obtain Γ ⊢ f ′ ⋆ u′ s
we conclude by type conversion (Lemma 4.2).
Case Transitivity:
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f1 ⋆ u s
b f2 ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f1 :=: f2 : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f1 s f2 : (x⋆U ) → T
b u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f2 ⋆ u s
b f3 ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f2 :=: f3 : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f2 s f3 : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
s,s′
We wish to prove that ∆ ⊢ f1 s f3 : (x⋆U ) → T . We get ∆ ⊢ f1 :=: f3 : (x⋆U ) → T
b u′ ⋆ U ,
immediately by transitivity of definitional equality. Given Γ ≤ ∆ and Γ ⊢ u s
b f3 ⋆ u′ : T [u/x].
we need to show that Γ ⊢ f1 ⋆ u s
b u ⋆ U , which
b : U is a PER by induction hypothesis, we have Γ ⊢ u s
As Γ ⊢ s
⋆
⋆
′
b
b
b f 3 ⋆ u′ :
entails f1 u s f2 u : T [u/x]. From Γ ⊢ u s u ⋆ U also have Γ ⊢ f2 ⋆ u s
b f3 ⋆ u′ : T [u/x] by transitivity at T [u/x].
T [u/x], which allows to conclude Γ ⊢ f1 ⋆ u s
Case Now, we consider function spaces:
18
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Case Transitivity:
b U2 : s 1
∆ ⊢ U1 s
b u′ ⋆ U1 =⇒ Γ ⊢ T1 [u/x] s
b T2 [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U1 ) → T1 :=: (x⋆U2 ) → T2 : s3
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U1 ) → T1 s (x⋆U2 ) → T2 : s3
b U3 : s 1
∆ ⊢ U2 s
b u′ ⋆ U2 =⇒ Γ ⊢ T2 [u/x] s
b T3 [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u s
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U2 ) → T2 :=: (x⋆U3 ) → T3 : s3
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U2 ) → T2 s (x⋆U3 ) → T3 : s3
b U3 : s1
By transitivity we have ∆ ⊢ (x⋆U1 ) → T1 :=: (x⋆U3 ) → T3 : s3 and ∆ ⊢ U1 s
by induction hypothesis on s1 .
Note that this is where the arrow sort annotations are useful. Without them we would
b U2 : s1
not know that the sorts in both derivations are equal. We could have ∆ ⊢ U1 s
′
′
b
and ∆ ⊢ U2 s U3 : s1 for apparently unrelated s1 and s1 , and would therefore be
unable to use transitivity.
b u′ ⋆ U1 , we need to show that Γ ⊢ T1 [u/x] s
b T3 [u′ /x] : s3 .
Given Γ ≤ ∆ and Γ ⊢ u s
b at type U is a PER by induction hypothesis, we have Γ ⊢ u s
b u⋆U1 , from which
As s
b
b U2 : s1 –
we can deduce Γ ⊢ T1 [u/x] s T2 [u/x] : s2 . By conversion using ∆ ⊢ U1 s
′
b u ⋆ U2 , which implies Γ ⊢ T2 [u/x] s
b T3 [u′ /x] : s2 .
weakened at Γ – we have Γ ⊢ u s
This allows us to conclude by transitivity at type s2 .
In the following we show that the variables are in the logical relation, i. e., ∆ ⊢ x s x :
∆(x) for well-formed contexts ∆. As usual, this statement has to be generalized to neutrals
n to be proven inductively.
b n′ ⋆T .
Lemma 4.4 (Into the logical relation). Let T ∈ s. If ∆ ⊢ n :=: n′ ⋆T then ∆ ⊢ n s
Proof. By induction on T ∈ s.
Case N ∈ s and ∆ ⊢ n :=: n′ ⋆ N . Then ∆ ⊢ n s n′ ⋆ N by cases on ⋆, unfolding
definitions.
Case s ∈ s′ and ∆ ⊢ N :=: N ′ ⋆ s. Then ∆ ⊢ N s N ′ ⋆ s by cases on ⋆.
Case (x⋆U ) → T ∈ s3 and ∆ ⊢ n :=: n′ ⋆0 (x⋆U ) → T .
First, the case for ⋆0 = :. We have ∆ ⊢ n :=: n′ : (x⋆U ) → T . Assume arbitrary
b u′ ⋆ U , which yields Γ ⊢ u :=: u′ ⋆ U and Γ ⊢ T [u/x] s
b T [u/x] : s2 .
Γ ≤ ∆ and Γ ⊢ u s
⋆
′
⋆
′
By weakening, Γ ⊢ n u :=: n u : T [u/x], thus, by induction hypothesis, Γ ⊢ n ⋆ u s
n′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x], q.e.d.
The case for ⋆0 = ÷ proceeds analogously.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
19
b to substitutions, by
4.3. Validity in the Model. We now extend our logical relation s
induction on the destination context.
b σ′ : Γ
b σ ′ (x) ⋆ U σ
∆ ⊢σs
∆ ⊢ σ(x) s
b σ′ : ⋄
b σ ′ : Γ. x⋆U
∆ ⊢σs
∆ ⊢σs
b for terms.
This relation inherits weakening from s
We then define the context ( Γ), type (Γ T = T ′ ) and term (Γ
relations, by induction on the length of contexts.
Γ
⋄
Γ U
Γ. x⋆U
Γ
T = T′ : s
Γ T = T′
Γ
t = t′ : T ) validity
T =T
Γ T
Γ
(Γ T unless T = s)
b
b t′ σ ′ : T σ
∆ ⊢ σ s σ ′ : Γ =⇒ ∆ ⊢ tσ s
Γ t=t:T
′
Γ t=t :T
Γ t:T
Because of its asymmetric definition, the logical relation on substitutions may not be a PER
in general, but it is for valid contexts.
b : Γ is symmetric
Lemma 4.5 (Substitution relation is a PER). If
Γ, then ∆ ⊢ s
and transitive.
∀∆, σ, σ ′ ,
Proof. By induction on Γ. We demonstrate symmetry for the case
b σ′ : Γ
b σ ′ (x) ⋆ U σ
∆ ⊢σs
∆ ⊢ σ(x) s
Γ. x⋆U .
b σ ′ : Γ. x⋆U
∆ ⊢σs
b σ : Γ, and by symmetry of s
b for terms (Lemma 4.3),
By induction hypothesis, ∆ ⊢ σ ′ s
′
b σ(x) ⋆ U σ. We instantiate Γ
b U σ ′ : s and conclude
∆ ⊢ σ (x) s
U to ∆ ⊢ U σ s
b σ(x) ⋆ U σ ′ by conversion (Lemma 4.2).
∆ ⊢ σ ′ (x) s
= : T is symmetric and transitive.
Lemma 4.6 (Validity is a PER). The relation Γ
b for substitutions and conversion with ∆ ⊢ T σ s
b
Proof. Symmetry requires symmetry of s
′
′
T σ : s , similar as in Lemma 4.5.
We demonstrate transitivity in detail. Given Γ t1 = t2 : T and Γ t2 = t3 : T we
show Γ t1 = t3 : T . Clearly,
Γ and Γ T or T = s by one of our two assumptions.
b σ ′ : Γ and show ∆ ⊢ t1 σ s
b t3 σ ′ : T σ. By Lemma 4.5,
Assume arbitrary ∆ ⊢ σ s
b σ : Γ, thus ∆ ⊢ t1 σ s
b t2 σ : T σ. Also, ∆ ⊢ t2 σ s
b t3 σ ′ : T σ which entails our goal
∆ ⊢σs
b
by transitivity of s (Lemma 4.3).
s1 ,s2
s′ ,s′
1 2
Lemma 4.7 (Function type injectivity is valid). If Γ
(x⋆U ) → T = (x⋆U ′ ) →
T′
′
′
′
′
′
T = T : s2 .
then s1 = s1 and s2 = s2 and Γ U = U : s1 and Γ. x⋆U
′
′
1 ,s2
1 ,s2
b σ ′ : Γ. We have ∆ ⊢ (x⋆U σ) s→
b (x⋆U ′ σ ′ ) s→
Proof. Assume arbitrary ∆ ⊢ σ s
Tσ s
b U σ : s1 —note that sorts
T ′ σ ′ : s3 , thus by definition s1 = s′1 and s2 = s′2 and ∆ ⊢ U ′ σ ′ s
b and since ∆, σ, σ ′
are closed and therefore invariant by substitution. By symmetry of s,
′
were arbitrary, we have Γ U = U : s1 .
b u′ ⋆ U ′ σ and let ρ = (σ, u/x) and ρ′ = (σ ′ , u′ /x).
Further, assume arbitrary ∆ ⊢ u s
b ρ′ : Γ. x⋆U ′ . We have
Note that w. l. o. g., x 6∈ dom(Γ) and x 6∈ FV(U ′ ) and ∆ ⊢ ρ s
b T ′ ρ′ : s2 and since ρ, ρ′ were arbitrary, Γ. x⋆U ′ T = T ′ : s2 .
∆ ⊢ Tρ s
20
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
b id : Γ.
Γ then ⊢ Γ and Γ ⊢ id s
Lemma 4.8 (Context satisfiable). If
Proof. By induction on Γ. The ⋄ case is immediate. In the Γ. x⋆U case, given
Γ
Γ U
Γ. x⋆U
we can use inference
b id : Γ
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id s
b id(x) ⋆ U id
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id(x) s
.
b id : Γ. x⋆U
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id s
b id : Γ, we obtain the first premise by weakening
From the induction hypothesis Γ ⊢ id s
b It also yields Γ ⊢ U id : sid for some s by definition of Γ
of s.
U . Using induction
hypothesis, ⊢ Γ, this entails ⊢ Γ. x⋆U . Further, Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x = x ⋆ U , and since trivially
b x⋆U , by the Lemma 4.4. This concludes
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x ←→ x⋆U , we can derive Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x s
b id(x) ⋆ U id.
the second premise Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id(x) s
We can now show that every equation valid in the model is derivable in IITT.
Theorem 4.9 (Completeness of IITT rules). If Γ
t = t′ : T then both Γ ⊢ t : T and
′
′
Γ ⊢ t : T and Γ ⊢ t = t : T and Γ ⊢ T .
b t′ : T , which entails Γ ⊢ t, t′ : T and Γ ⊢ t =
Proof. Using Lemma 4.8 we obtain Γ ⊢ t s
′
t : T . Analogously, since our assumption entails Γ T by definition, we get Γ ⊢ T .
4.4. Fundamental theorem. We prove a series of lemmata which constitute parts of the
fundamental theorem for the Kripke logical relation.
Lemma 4.10 (Resurrection). If
b σ ′ : Γ÷ .
∆÷ ⊢ σ ′ s
b σ ′ : Γ then ∆÷ ⊢ σ s
b σ : Γ÷ and
Γ and ∆ ⊢ σ s
Proof. By induction on Γ, the interesting case being
b σ′ : Γ
b σ ′ (x) ⋆ U σ
∆ ⊢σs
∆ ⊢ σ(x) s
.
b σ ′ : Γ. x⋆U
∆ ⊢σs
b σ : (Γ÷ . x : U ). By induction hypothesis ∆÷ ⊢ σ s
b σ : Γ÷ , and
First, we show ∆÷ ⊢ σ s
÷
b σ(x) : U σ. This immediately entails our goal.
by definition, ∆ ⊢ σ(x) s
b σ ′ : (Γ÷ . x : U ), observe that Γ U , hence ∆ ⊢ U σ s
b
For the second goal ∆÷ ⊢ σ ′ s
b σ ′ (x) : U σ to U σ ′
U σ ′ : s for some sort s. Thus, we can cast our hypothesis ∆ ⊢ σ ′ (x) s
and conclude analogously.
Corollary 4.11. If Γ⋆
b σ ′ : Γ then ∆ ⊢ uσ s
b uσ ′ ⋆ U σ.
u : U and ∆ ⊢ σ s
b
Proof. In case ⋆ = : it holds by definition, but we need resurrection for ⋆ = ÷. If ∆ ⊢ σ s
′
÷
÷
÷
b σ : Γ , so from Γ
σ : Γ, then by resurrection (Lemma 4.10) we have ∆ ⊢ σ s
u:U
÷
÷
′
′
′
b
b
we deduce ∆ ⊢ uσ s uσ : U σ. Analogously we get ∆ ⊢ uσ s uσ : U σ which we cast
b uσ ′ : U σ.
to ∆÷ ⊢ uσ ′ s
Lemma 4.12 (Validity of β-reduction).
Γ. x⋆U t : T
Γ⋆ u : U
Γ (λx⋆U. t) ⋆ u = t[u/x] : T [u/x]
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
21
b ρ′ : Γ
Proof.
Γ is contained in the first hypothesis Γ
u ⋆ U . Then, given ∆ ⊢ ρ s
⋆
′
′
b t(ρ , uρ /x) : T (ρ, uρ/x) and also ∆ ⊢ T [u/x]ρ s
b
we need to show ∆ ⊢ (λx⋆U. t)ρ uρ s
′
T [u/x]ρ : s for some s (the latter to get Γ T [u/x]).
Let σ = (ρ, uρ/x) and σ ′ = (ρ′ , uρ′ /x). From the second hypothesis and Cor. 4.11 we get
b uρ′ ⋆ U ρ, which gives ∆ ⊢ σ s
b σ ′ : Γ. x⋆U . By instantiating the first hypothesis
∆ ⊢ uρ s
b tσ ′ : T σ, and also (from the premise Γ. x⋆U T ) ∆ ⊢ T σ = T σ ′ , which
we get ∆ ⊢ tσ s
gives Γ T [u/x].
b tσ ′ we get the desired ∆ ⊢ (λx⋆U. t)ρ ⋆ uρ s
b tσ ′ : T σ, as s
b is
Finally, from ∆ ⊢ tσ s
⋆
closed by weak head expansion to well-typed ∆ ⊢ (λx⋆U. t)ρ uρ : T σ.
Lemma 4.13 (Validity of η).
Γ
Γ t : (x⋆U ) → T
t = λx⋆U. t ⋆ x : (x⋆U ) → T
b
Proof.
Γ and Γ (x⋆U ) → T are direct consequences of our hypothesis. Given ∆ ⊢ ρ s
′
⋆
′
b
ρ : Γ, we need to show ∆ ⊢ tρ s (λx⋆U. t x)ρ : ((x⋆U ) → T )ρ. W. l. o. g., x is not free in
the domain nor range of substitutions ρ and ρ′ , thus with t′ := tρ, t′′ := tρ′ , U ′ := U ρ, U ′′ :=
b λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ .
U ρ′ , T ′ := T ρ and T ′′ := T ρ′ it is sufficient to show ∆ ⊢ t′ s
′
′
′
′
b u′ ⋆ U ′ , we show ∆′ ⊢ t′ ⋆ u s
b
First, given (∆ , u, u ) such that ∆ ≤ ∆ and ∆ ⊢ u s
′′
′′
⋆
⋆
′
′
′
b
(λx⋆U . t x) u : T [u/x]. Our hypothesis Γ
t : (x⋆U ) → T entails ∆ ⊢ tρ s tρ :
′
′′
b
((x⋆U ) → T )ρ, that is to say ∆ ⊢ t s t : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ . This logical relation at a
b t′′ ⋆ u′ : T ′ [u/x], which
function type, when instantiated to (∆′ , u, u′ ), gives us ∆′ ⊢ t′ ⋆ u s
weak-head expands to the desired goal.
Second, we show ∆ ⊢ t′ :=: λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ .
• Γ ⊢ t′ : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ is a simple consequence of our hypothesis Γ t : (x⋆U ) → T .
• Γ ⊢ λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ has the following proof:
Γ t : (x⋆U ) → T
=====′′======′′======′′
∆ ⊢ t : (x⋆U ) → T
∆. x⋆U ′′ ⊢ t′′ : (x⋆U ′′ ) → T ′′
weak
(∆. x⋆U ′′ )⋆ ⊢ x : U ′′
var
∆. x⋆U ′′ ⊢ t′′ ⋆ x : T ′′
Γ (x⋆U ) → T
========′′======′′
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T
∆ ⊢ λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′′ ) → T ′′
∆ ⊢ λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′
conv
• ∆ ⊢ t′ = λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ . The η-rule of definitional equality gives us
∆ ⊢ t′′ = λx⋆U ′′ . t′′ ⋆ x : (x⋆U ′′ ) → T ′′ . From Γ (x⋆U ) → T we can convert it
to the type (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ , and then conclude by transitivity using ∆ ⊢ t′ = t′′ :
(x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ , which is a direct consequence of Γ t : (x⋆U ) → T .
Lemma 4.14 (Validity of function equality).
Γ
Γ
U = U′
Γ. x⋆U t = t′ : T
(λx⋆U. t) = (λx⋆U ′ . t′ ) : (x⋆U ) → T
Proof. Again
Γ and Γ (x⋆U ) → T are simple consequences of our hypotheses. Given
′
b
∆ ⊢ ρ s ρ : Γ (w. l. o. g., x is not free in ρ, ρ′ domain or range), we need to show
22
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
b (λx⋆U ′ ρ′ . t′ ρ′ ) : ((x⋆U ρ) → T ρ). We will skip the proof of ∆ ⊢
∆ ⊢ (λx⋆U ρ. tρ) s
(λx⋆U ρ. tρ) :=: (λx⋆U ′ ρ′ . t′ ρ′ ) : ((x⋆U ρ) → T ρ), as it is similar to the corresponding part
of the η-validity lemma.
b u′ ⋆ U ρ, we have to show that
Given (∆′ , u, u′ ) such that ∆′ ≤ ∆ and ∆′ ⊢ u s
′
⋆
′
′
′
′
⋆
′
b (λx⋆U ρ . t ρ ) u : T ρ[u/x]. Let σ = (ρ, u/x) and σ ′ = (ρ′ , u′ /x).
∆ ⊢ (λx⋆U ρ. tρ) u s
b u′ ⋆ U ρ, we have ∆′ ⊢ σ s
b σ ′ : Γ. x⋆U ρ. Instantiating the second
As we supposed ∆′ ⊢ u s
′
′
′
hypothesis with ∆ , σ, σ therefore gives us ∆ ⊢ tσ = t′ σ ′ : T σ, which can also be written
b t′ ρ′ [u′ /x] : T ρ[u/x], which is weak-head expansible to our goal.
∆′ ⊢ tρ[u/x] s
Lemma 4.15 (Validity of irrelevant application).
Γ
t = t′ : (x÷U ) → T
Γ÷ u : U
Γ t ÷ u = t′ ÷ u′ : T [u/x]
Γ÷
u′ : U
b ρ′ : Γ and show ∆ ⊢ tρ ÷ uρ s
b t′ ρ′ ÷ u′ ρ′ : T (ρ, uρ/x).
Proof. Assume arbitrary ∆ ⊢ ρ s
b u′ ρ′ ÷ U ρ, which means ∆÷ ⊢
By the first hypothesis, it is sufficient to show ∆ ⊢ uρ s
÷
′
′
′
′
b
b
b
uρ s uρ : U ρ and ∆ ⊢ u ρ s u ρ : U ρ. By Resurrection (Lemma 4.10), ∆÷ ⊢ ρ s
b uρ : U ρ from the second hypothesis. Analogously, we obtain
ρ : Γ÷ , hence ∆÷ ⊢ uρ s
÷
′
′
′
′
′
b u ρ : U ρ from the third hypothesis which we can cast to U ρ by virtue of
∆ ⊢ uρ s
Γ U which we get from Γ (x÷U ) → T by Lemma 4.7.
Theorem 4.16 (Fundamental theorem of logical relations).
(1) If ⊢ Γ then
Γ.
(2) If Γ ⊢ t : T then Γ t : T .
(3) If Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ t = t′ : T .
Proof. By induction on the derivation.
As a simple corollary we obtain syntactic validity, namely that definitional equality
implies well-typedness and well-typedness implies well-formedness of the involved type.
This lemma could have been proven purely syntactically, but the syntactic proof requires a
sequence of carefully arranged lemmata like context conversion, substitution, functionality,
and inversion on types [HP05, AC07]. Our “sledgehammer” semantic argument is built into
the Kripke logical relation, in the spirit of Goguen [Gog00].
Corollary 4.17 (Syntactic validity).
(1) If Γ ⊢ t : T then Γ ⊢ T .
(2) If Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ ⊢ t : T and Γ ⊢ t′ : T .
Proof. By the fundamental theorem, Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T implies Γ
Thm. 4.9 implies Γ ⊢ t, t′ : T and Γ ⊢ T .
t = t′ : T , which by
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
23
5. Meta-theoretic Consequences of the Model Construction
In this section, we explicate the results established by the Kripke model.
5.1. Admissibility of Substitution. Goguen [Gog00] observes that admissibility of substitution for the syntactic judgements can be inherited from the Kripke logical relation,
which is closed under substitution by its very definition.
To show that the judgements of IITT are closed under substitution we introduce relations Γ ⊢ σ : Γ′ for substitution typing and Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ for substitution equality which
are given inductively by the following rules:
Γ ⊢ σ : Γ′
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢σ:⋄
Γ′ ⊢ U
Γ ⊢ σ(x) ⋆ U σ
′
Γ ⊢ σ : Γ . x⋆U
Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′
Γ′ ⊢ U
Γ ⊢ σ(x) = σ ′ (x) ⋆ U σ
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢ σ = σ′ : ⋄
Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ . x⋆U
Substitution typing and equality are closed under weakening.
Semantically, substitutions are explained by environments. We define substitution validity as follows, again in rule form but not inductively:
Γ
Γ′
b
b σ ′ ρ′ : Γ ′
Γ σ=σ:
∀∆ ρ s
: Γ. ∆ σρ s
Γ σ : Γ′
Γ σ = σ ′ : Γ′
Lemma 5.1 (Fundamental lemma for substitutions).
(1) If Γ ⊢ σ : Γ′ then Γ σ : Γ′ .
(2) If Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ then Γ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ .
Γ′
ρ′
Proof. We demonstrate 2 by induction on Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ .
Case
⊢Γ
Γ ⊢ σ = σ′ : ⋄
b σ ′ ρ′ : ⋄ trivially for any
We have
Γ by Thm. 4.16 and
⋄ trivially. Also, ∆ ⊢ σρ s
′
b ρ : Γ.
∆ ⊢ρs
Case
Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′
Γ′ ⊢ U
Γ ⊢ σ(x) = σ ′ (x) ⋆ U σ
Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ . x⋆U
′
We have
Γ and
Γ by induction hypothesis and Γ′
U by Thm. 4.16, thus,
′
b ρ′ : Γ and show ∆ ⊢ σρ s
b σ ′ ρ′ : Γ′ . x⋆U .
Γ . x⋆U . Now assume arbitrary ∆ ⊢ ρ s
b σ ′ ρ′ : Γ′ follows by induction hypothesis. The second subgoal ∆ ⊢
First, ∆ ⊢ σρ s
′
′
b
(σρ)(x) s (σ ρ )(x) ⋆ U σρ is just an instance of the second induction hypothesis.
Theorem 5.2 (Substitution and functionality).
(1) If Γ ⊢ σ : Γ′ and Γ′ ⊢ t : T then Γ ⊢ tσ : T σ.
(2) If Γ ⊢ σ : Γ′ . and Γ′ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ ⊢ tσ = t′ σ : T σ.
(3) If Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ . and Γ′ ⊢ t : T then Γ ⊢ tσ = tσ ′ : T σ.
(4) If Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ . and Γ′ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ ⊢ tσ = t′ σ ′ : T σ.
24
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Proof. We demonstrate 4, the other cases are just variations of the theme. First, from
b σ ′ : Γ′ by the fundamental lemma for substitutions
Γ ⊢ σ = σ ′ : Γ′ we get Γ ⊢ σ s
b id : Γ. Now, by the fundamental
(Lemma 5.1), using the identity environment Γ ⊢ id s
′
′
′
b t σ : T σ, which entails our goal Γ ⊢ tσ =
theorem on Γ ⊢ t = t : T we obtain Γ ⊢ tσ s
′
′
t σ : T σ by Thm. 4.9.
5.2. Context conversion. Context equality ⊢ Γ = Γ′ is defined inductively by the rules
⊢ Γ = Γ′
Γ ⊢ U = U′
.
⊢⋄=⋄
⊢ Γ. x⋆U = Γ′ . x⋆U ′
All declarative judgements are closed under context conversion. This fact is easy to
prove by induction over derivations, but we get it as just a special case of substitution.
Lemma 5.3 (Identity substitution). If ⊢ Γ = Γ′ then Γ ⊢ id = id : Γ′ .
Proof. By induction on ⊢ Γ = Γ′ .
Case
⊢ Γ = Γ′
Γ ⊢ U = U′
⊢ Γ. x⋆U = Γ′ . x⋆U ′
By induction hypothesis and weakening, Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id = id : Γ′ . Also, Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x = x ⋆ U
and by conversion Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x = x ⋆ U ′ . Together, Γ. x⋆U ⊢ id = id : Γ′ . x⋆U ′ .
Theorem 5.4 (Context conversion). Let ⊢ Γ′ = Γ.
(1) If Γ ⊢ t : T then Γ′ ⊢ t : T .
(2) If Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ′ ⊢ t = t′ : T .
Proof. By Thm. 5.2 with Γ′ ⊢ id = id : Γ.
U′
As a consequence, context equality is symmetric and transitive (we can trade Γ ⊢ U =
for Γ′ ⊢ U = U ′ ). Thus, context conversion can be applied in the other direction as well.
5.3. Inversion, injectivity, and type unicity. A condition for the decidability of type
checking is the ability to invert typing derivations. The proof requires substitution.
Lemma 5.5 (Inversion).
(1) If Γ ⊢ x : T then (x : U ) ∈ Γ for some U with Γ ⊢ U = T .
(2) If Γ ⊢ λx⋆U. t : T then Γ. x⋆U ⊢ t : T ′ for some T ′ with Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T ′ = T .
(3) If Γ ⊢ t ⋆ u : T then Γ ⊢ t : (x⋆U ) → T ′ and Γ ⊢ u ⋆ U for some U, T ′ with Γ ⊢
T ′ [u/x] = T .
(4) If Γ ⊢ s : T then there is (s, s′ ) ∈ Axiom such that Γ ⊢ s′ = T .
s1 ,s2
(5) If Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T ′ : T then Γ ⊢ U : s1 and Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T ′ : s2 , and for some s3 we have
Γ ⊢ s3 = T and (s1 , s2 , s3 ) ∈ Rule.
Proof. Each by induction on the typing derivation.
Remark 5.6. The need for inversion during type checking is the only good reason to have
separate typing rules and not simply define typing Γ ⊢ t : T as the diagonal Γ ⊢ t = t : T
of equality. While by a logical relation argument we will obtain a suitable inversion result
for Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T = (x⋆U ) → T —the famous function type injectivity (Theorem 5.7)— it
seems hard to get something similar for application t u.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
25
Injectivity for function types w. r. t. typed equality is known to be tricky. It is connected
to subject reduction and required for many meta-theoretic results. We harvest it from our
Kripke model.
s1 ,s2
s′ ,s′
1 2
Theorem 5.7 (Function type injectivity). If Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T = (x⋆U ′ ) →
T ′ : s3 then
′
′
′
′
s1 = s1 and s2 = s2 and Γ ⊢ U = U : s1 and Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T = T : s2 .
b
Proof. This follows from Lemma 4.7. Or we can prove it directly as follows: Since Γ ⊢ id s
s1 ,s2
s
,s
1
2
b (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3 which by
id : Γ we have by the fundamental theorem Γ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T s
′
′
′
b U : s1 and Γ ⊢ U = U ′ : s1 . Since
inversion yields first s1 = s1 and s2 = s2 and Γ ⊢ U s
b x⋆U , we also obtain Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T s
b T ′ : s2 and conclude Γ. x⋆U ⊢ T = T ′ : s2 .
Γ. x⋆U ⊢ x s
From the inversion lemma we can prove uniqueness of types, since we are dealing with
a functional PTS, and we have function type injectivity.
Theorem 5.8 (Type unicity). If Γ ⊢ t : T and Γ ⊢ t : T ′ then Γ ⊢ T = T ′ .
Proof. By induction on t, using inversion.
5.4. Normalization and Subject Reduction. An immediate consequence of the model
construction is that each term has a weak head normal form and that typing and equality
is preserved by weak head normalization.
Theorem 5.9 (Normalization and subject reduction). If Γ ⊢ t : T then t ց a and Γ ⊢ t =
a : T.
b t : T which by definition contains a derivation
Proof. By the fundamental theorem, Γ ⊢ t s
of Γ ⊢ t = ↓t : T .
5.5. Consistency. Importantly, not every type is inhabited in IITT, thus, it can be used
as a logic. A prerequisite is that types can be distinguished, which follows immediately
from the construction of the logical relation.
Lemma 5.10 (Type constructor discrimination). Neutral types, sorts and function types
are mutually unequal.
(1) Γ ⊢ N 6= s.
(2) Γ ⊢ N 6= (x⋆U ) → T .
(3) Γ ⊢ s = s′ implies s ≡ s′ .
(4) Γ ⊢ s 6= (x⋆U ) → T .
Proof. By the fundamental theorem applied to the identity substitution. For instance,
assuming Γ ⊢ N = s : s′ we get Γ ⊢ N s s : s′ but this is a contradiction to the definition
of s.
From normalization and type constructor discrimination we can show that not every
type is inhabited.
Theorem 5.11 (Consistency). X : Set0 6 ⊢ t : X.
26
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Proof. Let Γ = (X : Set0 ). Assuming Γ ⊢ t : X, we have Γ ⊢ a : X for the whnf a of t.
We invert on the typing of a. By Lemma 5.10, X cannot be equal to a function type or
sort, thus, a can neither be a λ nor a function type nor a sort, it can only be neutral. The
only variable X must be in the head of a, but since X is not of function type, it cannot be
applied. Thus, a ≡ X and Γ ⊢ X : X, implying Γ ⊢ X = Set0 by inversion (Lemma 5.5).
This is in contradiction to Lemma 5.10!
5.6. Soundness of Algorithmic Equality. Soundness of the equality algorithm is a consequence of subject reduction.
Theorem 5.12 (Soundness of algorithmic equality).
(1) Let ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : T . If ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T then ∆ ⊢ t = t′ : T .
′
(2) Let ∆ ⊢ n, n : T . If ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : U then ∆ ⊢ n = n′ : U and ∆ ⊢ U = T .
Proof. Generalize the theorem to all six algorithmic equality judgments and prove it by
induction on the algorithmic equality derivation. Since we have subject reduction, the
proof proceeds mechanically, because each algorithmic rule corresponds, modulo weak head
normalization, to a declarative rule.
Case ∆ ⊢ T : s and ∆′ ⊢ T ′ : s and
∆ ⊢ ↓T ⇐⇒ ↓T ′
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
′
By induction hypothesis, ∆ ⊢ ↓T = ↓T : s. By subject reduction ∆ ⊢ T = ↓T : s and
∆ ⊢ T ′ = ↓T ′ : s. By transitivity ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ : s.
Case
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒ T ′ : s
By induction hypothesis, ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ : s.
5.7. Symmetry and Transitivity of Algorithmic Equality. Since algorithmic equality
is sound for well-typed terms, it is also symmetric and transitive.
Lemma 5.13 (Type and context conversion in algorithmic equality). Let ⊢ ∆ = ∆′ .
(1) If ∆ ⊢ A, A′ and ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ then ∆′ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ .
(2) If ∆ ⊢ n, n′ : A and ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : A then ∆′ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : A′ for some A′ with
∆ ⊢ A = A′ .
(3) If ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : A and ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A and ∆ ⊢ A = A′ then ∆′ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A′ .
Proof. By induction on the derivation of algorithmic equality, where we extend the statements to ←→
b and ⇐⇒
b accordingly.
(1) Type equality.
Case
∆ ⊢ U ⇐⇒
b U′
∆. x⋆U ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T′
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T ⇐⇒ (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′
By inversion, ∆ ⊢ U, U ′ and by induction hypothesis, ∆′ ⊢ U ⇐⇒
b U ′ . Again by
′
′
inversion, ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T and ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T , yet by soundness of algorithmic equality,
∆ ⊢ U = U ′ , hence ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T ′ by context conversion. Further, ⊢ ∆. x⋆U =
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
27
∆′ . x⋆U . Thus, we can apply the other induction hypothesis to obtain ∆′ . x⋆U ⊢
T ⇐⇒
b T ′ , which finally yields ∆′ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T ⇐⇒ (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ .
(2) Structural equality.
Case
(x : T ) ∈ ∆
∆ ⊢ x ←→
b x:T
Since ⊢ ∆ = ∆′ , there is a unique (x : T ′ ) ∈ ∆′ with ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ . Hence,
∆′ ⊢ x ←→
b x : T ′.
Case
Type-directed equality.
Case ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : T and ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ and
T ցA
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T
By normalization, T ′ ց A′ , and subject reduction ∆ ⊢ A = T = T ′ = A′ . Since
by conversion, ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : A, by induction hypothesis ∆′ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A′ . Thus,
∆′ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T ′ .
Case ∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T = A′ and
∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x ⇐⇒
b t′ ⋆ x : T
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
By injectivity A′ ≡ (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ with ∆ ⊢ U = U ′ and ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T = T ′ . Since
⊢ ∆. x⋆U = ∆′ . x⋆U ′ , by induction hypothesis we have ∆′ . x⋆U ′ ⊢ t ⋆ x ⇐⇒
b t′ ⋆ x :
′
′
′
′
′
T . We conclude ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t : (x⋆U ) → T .
Lemma 5.14 (Algorithmic equality is transitive). Let ⊢ ∆ = ∆′ . In the following, let the
terms submitted to algorithmic equality be well-typed.
(1) If ∆ ⊢ n1 ←→
b n2 : T and ∆′ ⊢ n2 ←→
b n3 : T ′ then ∆ ⊢ n1 ←→
b n3 : T and
′
∆ ⊢T =T .
(2) If ∆ ⊢ t1 ⇐⇒
b t2 : T and ∆′ ⊢ t2 ⇐⇒
b t3 : T ′ and ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ then ∆ ⊢ t1 ⇐⇒
b t3 : T .
′
(3) If ∆ ⊢ T1 ⇐⇒
b T2 : s and ∆ ⊢ T2 ⇐⇒
b T3 : s then ∆ ⊢ T1 ⇐⇒
b T3 : s
Proof. We extend these statements to ←→ and ⇐⇒ and prove them simultaneously by
induction on the first derivation.
Case
∆′ ⊢ n2 ←→
b n3 : T ′
∆ ⊢ n1 ←→
b n2 : T
∆ ⊢ n1 ⇐⇒ n2 : N
∆′ ⊢ n2 ⇐⇒ n3 : N ′
By induction hypothesis ∆ ⊢ n1 ←→
b n3 : T , hence, ∆ ⊢ n1 ⇐⇒ n3 : N .
Case
∆ ⊢ N1 ←→
b N2 : T
∆ ⊢ N2 ←→
b N3 : T ′
∆ ⊢ N1 ⇐⇒ N2
∆ ⊢ N2 ⇐⇒ N3
Analogously.
28
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Case
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ n1 ←→ n2 : (x : U ) → T
∆ ⊢ u1 ⇐⇒
b u2 : U
∆ ⊢ n1 u1 ←→
b n2 u2 : T [u1 /x]
s′ ,s′
1 2
∆′ ⊢ n2 ←→ n3 : (x : U ′ ) →
T′
∆′ ⊢ u2 ⇐⇒
b u3 : U ′
∆′ ⊢ n2 u2 ←→
b n3 u3 : T ′ [u2 /x]
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
By induction hypothesis we have ∆ ⊢ n1 ←→ n3 : (x : U ) → T and ∆ ⊢ (x : U ) →
s′ ,s′
1 2
T = (x : U ′ ) →
T ′ which gives in particular s1 = s′1 , s2 = s′2 , and ∆ ⊢ U = U ′ : s1
by function type injectivity (Thm. 5.7). By induction hypothesis we can then deduce
∆ ⊢ u1 ⇐⇒
b u3 : U , and therefore conclude ∆ ⊢ n1 u1 ←→ n3 u3 : T [u1 /x].
Case
∆ ⊢ U1 ⇐⇒
b U2 : s 1
s1 ,s2
∆. x⋆U1 ⊢ T1 ⇐⇒
b T2 : s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U1 ) → T1 ⇐⇒ (x⋆U2 ) → T2 : s3
∆ ⊢ U2 ⇐⇒
b U3 : s 1
∆. x⋆U2 ⊢ T2 ⇐⇒
b T3 : s2
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U2 ) → T2 ⇐⇒ (x⋆U3 ) → T3 : s2
We get ∆ ⊢ U1 ⇐⇒
b U3 : s1 by transitivity. To also get ∆. x⋆U1 ⊢ T1 ⇐⇒
b T3 : s2 we
need ⊢ ∆. x⋆U2 = ∆. x⋆U1 , but this stems from ∆ ⊢ U1 ⇐⇒
b U2 : s1 by soundness of
algorithmic equality.
Theorem 5.15. The algorithmic equality relations are PERs on well-typed expressions.
Proof. By Lemma 5.14 and an analogous proof of symmetry.
6. A Kripke Logical Relation for Completeness
The only open issues in the meta-theory of IITT are completeness and termination of
algorithmic equality. In parts, completeness has been established in the last section already,
namely, we have shown injectivity and discrimination for type constructors. What is missing
is injectivity and discrimination for neutrals, e. g., if ∆ ⊢ n u = n′ u′ : T ′ then necessarily
∆ ⊢ n = n′ : (x : U ) → T and ∆ ⊢ u = u′ : U , plus ∆ ⊢ T [u/x] = T ′ . In untyped λcalculus, this is an instance of Boehm’s theorem [Bar84]. We follow Coquand [Coq91] and
Harper and Pfenning [HP05] and prove it by constructing a second Kripke logical relation,
c , for completeness which is very similar to the first one, s, but at base types additionally
requires algorithmic equality to hold. After proving the fundamental lemma again, we know
that definitionally equal terms are also algorithmically so. As a consequence, equality is
decidable in IITT, and so is type checking.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
29
6.1. Another Kripke Logical Relation. Again, by induction on A ∈ s we define two
Kripke relations
∆ ⊢ A c A′ : s
∆ ⊢ a c a′ : A.
c and the generalization to ⋆. This time, however,
together with their respective closures c
at base types we will additionally require algorithmic equality to hold, more precisely, the
relation ∆ ⊢ t :⇐⇒: t′ : T which stands for the conjunction of the propositions
• ∆ ⊢ t : T and ∆ ⊢ t′ : T , and
• ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T .
Note that by soundness of algorithmic equality, :⇐⇒: implies :=:.
Again, we allow ourselves rule notation for the defining clauses of c .
∆ ⊢ n :⇐⇒: n′ : N
∆ ⊢ n c n′ : N
∆ ⊢ N :⇐⇒: N ′ : s
∆ ⊢ N c N′ : s
⊢∆
(s, s′ )
∆ ⊢ s c s : s′
c U ′ : s1
∆ ⊢U c
c u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ T [u/x] c
c T ′ [u′ /x] : s2
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u c
s1 ,s2
s1 ,s2 ′
′
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T :=: (x⋆U ) → T : s3
s ,s
s ,s
1 2
1 2
∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T c (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3
(s1 , s2 , s3 )
c u′ ⋆ U =⇒ Γ ⊢ f ⋆ u c
c f ′ ⋆ u′ : T [u/x]
∀Γ ≤ ∆, Γ ⊢ u c
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f :=: f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
s,s′
∆ ⊢ f c f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T
∆ ⊢ ↓t c ↓t′ : ↓T
∆ ⊢ t :=: t′ : T
c t′ : T
∆ ⊢tc
∆÷ ⊢ a c a : A
∆÷ ⊢ a′ c a′ : A
∆ ⊢ a c a′ ÷ A
c t:T
∆÷ ⊢ t c
c t′ : T
∆ ÷ ⊢ t′ c
c t′ ÷ T
∆ ⊢tc
This logical relation contains only well-typed and definitionally equal terms. It is symmetric,
transitive, and closed under weakening and type conversion. The proofs are in analogy to
those of Section 4, which are relying on the fact that the underlying relation :=: is a Kripke
PER and closed under type conversion. The relation :⇐⇒: underlying c has the same
properties, thanks to soundness of algorithmic equality.
Note that in the definition of ∆ ⊢ f c f ′ : (x⋆U ) → T we did not require f and f ′
to be algorithmically equal. This would hinder the proof of the fundamental theorem for
c , since algorithmic equality is not closed under application by definition—it will follow
from the fundamental theorem, though. In the next lemma we shall prove that f and f ′
are algorithmically equal if they are related by c . The name Escape Lemma was coined
by Jeffrey Sarnat [SS08].
Lemma 6.1 (Escape from the logical relation). Let ∆ ⊢ A c A′ : s
(1) ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ .
c t′ : A then ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A.
(2) If ∆ ⊢ t c
(3) If ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ ⋆ A and ∆ ⊢ n = n′ ⋆ A then ∆ ⊢ n c n′ ⋆ A.
30
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
c T′ : s
Corollary 6.2. Let ∆ ⊢ T c
(1) ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T ′.
c t′ : T then ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
(2) If ∆ ⊢ t c
b t′ : T .
c n′ ⋆ T .
(3) If ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ ⋆ T and ∆ ⊢ n = n′ ⋆ T then ∆ ⊢ n c
The corollary is a direct, non-inductive consequence of the lemma, so we can use it in
the proof of the lemma, quoted as “IH”.
Proof of the lemma. Simultaneously by induction on A :⇐⇒: A′ : s.
Case ∆ ⊢ N c N ′ : s.
Case 1. ∆ ⊢ N ⇐⇒ N ′ by assumption.
Case 2. We have ∆ ⊢ ↓t ←→ ↓t′ : , thus ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : N .
Case 3.
First, consider ⋆ = :. If ∆ ⊢ n = n′ : N and ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : N then ∆ ⊢ n ⇐⇒ n′ : N
and trivially ∆ ⊢ n c n′ : N .
Then, take ⋆ = ÷. Note that if ∆÷ ⊢ n = n : N and ∆÷ ⊢ n ←→ n : N then
∆÷ ⊢ n ⇐⇒ n : N and ∆÷ ⊢ n c n : N . This implies that if ∆ ⊢ n = n′ ÷ N and
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ ÷ N then ∆ ⊢ n ⇐⇒ n′ ÷ N and ∆ ⊢ n c n′ ÷ N .
Case ∆ ⊢ s c s : s′ .
Case 1. Clearly, ∆ ⊢ s ⇐⇒ s.
c T ′ : s. Then ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
Case 2. Let ∆ ⊢ T c
b T ′ by IH 1, thus ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒ T ′ : s
′
Case 3. For ⋆ = : let ∆ ⊢ N ←→ N : s. By inversion, ∆ ⊢ N ←→
b N ′ : T for some T .
′
′
Then ∆ ⊢ N ⇐⇒ N and ∆ ⊢ N c N : s by definition.
Considering ⋆ = ÷, it is sufficient to observe that ∆÷ ⊢ N ←→ N : s implies
∆÷ ⊢ N ⇐⇒ N and ∆÷ ⊢ N c N : s by definition.
Case ∆ ⊢ (x⋆U ) → T c (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ : s3 .
Case 1. Similar to 2.
c t′ : (x⋆U ) → T . It is sufficient to show ∆. x⋆U ⊢
Case 2. By assumption, ∆ ⊢ t c
⋆
′
⋆
c U ′ : s1 , which includes ∆ ⊢ U , we have ∆. x⋆U ⊢
t x ⇐⇒
b t x : T . Since ∆ ⊢ U c
c t′ ⋆ x : ↓T via
x = x ⋆ U . Since also ∆. x⋆U ⊢ x ←→
b x ⋆ U , we obtain ∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x c
IH 3, ∆. x⋆U ⊢ x c x ⋆ U . IH 2 then entails our goal.
Case 3. First, the case for ⋆ = :. We reuse variable ⋆ for a different irrelevance
marker. We have ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : (x⋆U ) → T . Assume arbitrary Γ :⇐⇒: Γ ≤ ∆ and
c u′ ⋆ U , which yields Γ ⊢ u = u′ ⋆ U and Γ ⊢ T [u/x] c
c T [u′ /x] : Seti . In
Γ ⊢uc
′
case ⋆ = : we have to apply IH 2 for Γ ⊢ u ⇐⇒ u : ↓U . Otherwise, we obtain directly
Γ ⊢ n ⋆ u ←→ n′ ⋆ u′ : ↓(T [u/x]). By IH 3, Γ ⊢ n ⋆ u c n′ ⋆ u′ : ↓(T [u/x]).
The case for ⋆ = ÷ proceeds analogously.
b we extend c
c to substitutions and define the semantic validity judgements
In analogy to s
c Γ and Γ
c t : T and Γ
c t = t′ : T based on c
c . Since by the escape lemma,
c x : ∆(x), we have Γ ⊢ id c
c id : Γ for c Γ. Finally, we reprove the fundamental
∆ ⊢xc
theorem:
c ).
Theorem 6.3 (Fundamental theorem for c
c
(1) If ⊢ Γ then
Γ.
(2) If Γ ⊢ t : T then Γ c t : T .
(3) If Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T then Γ c t = t′ : T .
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
31
6.2. Completeness and Decidability of Algorithmic Equality. Derivations of algorithmic equality can now be obtained by escaping from the logical relation.
Theorem 6.4 (Completeness of algorithmic equality). Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T implies Γ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b
t′ : T .
c id : Γ, we have Γ ⊢ t c
c t′ : T by the fundamental theorem, and
Proof. Since Γ ⊢ id c
conclude with Lemma 6.1.2.
Termination of algorithmic equality is a consequence of completeness. When invoking
the algorithmic equality check ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T on two well-typed expressions ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : T
we know by completeness that t and t′ are related to themselves, i. e., ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t : T and
∆ ⊢ t′ ⇐⇒
b t′ : T . This means that t, t′ , and T are weakly normalizing by the strategy the
equality algorithm implements: reduce to weak head normal form and recursively continue
with the subterms. Running the equality check on t and t′ performs, if successful, exactly
the same reductions, and if it fails, at most the same reductions in t, t′ , and T . Hence,
testing equality on well-typed terms always terminates. This argument has been applied
in previous work to untyped equality [AC07]. Here, we apply it to typed equality; it is
an alternative to Goguen’s technique of proving termination for typed equality from strong
normalization [Gog05], which, in our opinion, does not scale to dependently-typed equality.
Lemma 6.5 (Termination of algorithmic equality). Let ⊢ ∆.
(1) Type equality.
(a) Let ∆ ⊢ A, A′ . If D :: ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A and ∆ ⊢ A′ ⇐⇒ A′ then the query
∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ terminates.
(b) Let ∆ ⊢ T, T ′ . If D :: ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T and ∆ ⊢ T ′ ⇐⇒
b T ′ then the query ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b
′
T terminates.
(2) Structural equality. Let ∆ ⊢ n : T and ∆ ⊢ n′ : T ′ .
(a) If D :: ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n : A and ∆ ⊢ n′ ←→ n′ : A′ then the query ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : ?
terminates. If successfully, it returns A and we have ∆ ⊢ A = T = T ′ = A.
(b) If D :: ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n : T and ∆ ⊢ n′ ←→
b n′ : T ′ then the query ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : ?
′
terminates. If successfully, it returns T and we have ∆ ⊢ T = T .
(3) Type-directed equality.
(a) Let ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : A. If D :: ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t : A and ∆ ⊢ t′ ⇐⇒ t′ : A then the query
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A terminates.
(b) Let ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : T . If D :: ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t : T and ∆ ⊢ t′ ⇐⇒
b t′ : T then the query
′
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t : T terminates.
Proof. Simultaneously by induction on derivation D.
(1) Type equality.
Case A = A′ = s. The query ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ terminates successfully.
Case A = (x⋆U ) → T and A′ = (x⋆U ′ ) → T ′ . First, the query ∆ ⊢ U ⇐⇒
b U ′ runs.
By induction hypothesis, it terminates. If it fails, the whole query fails. Otherwise,
the query ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T ′ is run. By induction hypothesis on ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T
′
′
and ∆. x⋆U ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T ′ , the query terminates.
Case A = N and A′ = N ′ neutral. By induction hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ N ←→
b N :T
and ∆ ⊢ N ′ ←→
b N ′ : T ′ , the query ∆ ⊢ N ←→
b N ′ : ? terminates. Hence, the query
∆ ⊢ N ⇐⇒ N ′ terminates.
32
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Case Weak head normal forms A, A′ not covered by previous cases: the query ∆ ⊢
A ⇐⇒ A′ fails immediately, since there is no applicable algorithmic type equality
rule.
Case The query ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T ′ first invokes weak head normalization on T and T ′ .
Both terminate since ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T , which implies T ց A, and analogously T ′ ց A′
′
′
since ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T by assumption. Then, the query ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A′ is run, which
terminates by induction hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ A ⇐⇒ A and ∆ ⊢ A′ ⇐⇒ A′ .
(2) Structural equality.
Case n = n′ = x. The query ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : ? terminates successfully, returning type
∆(x). Since ⊢ ∆, by inversion (Lemma 5.5) ∆ ⊢ T = T ′ = ∆(x).
Case Neutral relevant application for ∆ ⊢ n u : T0 and ∆ ⊢ n′ u′ : T0′ .
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n : (x : U ) → T
∆ ⊢ u ⇐⇒
b u:U
∆ ⊢ n u ←→
b n u : T [u/x]
∆ ⊢ n′ ←→ n′ : (x : U ′ ) → T ′
∆ ⊢ u′ ⇐⇒
b u′ : U ′
∆ ⊢ n′ u′ ←→
b n′ u′ : T ′ [u′ /x]
The query ∆ ⊢ n u ←→
b n′ u′ : ? first invokes query ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : ?. By induction
hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n : (x : U ) → T and ∆ ⊢ n′ ←→ n′ : (x : U ′ ) → T ′
the query terminates. If it fails the whole query fails. Otherwise it returns a type
A in weak head normal form, which is identical to (x : U ) → T by uniqueness of
inferred types (Lemma 3.1). Further, ∆ ⊢ (x : U ) → T = (x : U ′ ) → T ′ , and by
function type injectivity (Thm. 5.7), ∆ ⊢ U = U ′ and ∆. x : U ⊢ T = T ′ . Thus, we
can invoke the induction hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ u ⇐⇒
b u : U and ∆ ⊢ u′ ⇐⇒
b u′ : U
′
′
′
(cast from ∆ ⊢ u ⇐⇒
b u : U , Lemma 5.13) to infer that the second subquery
∆ ⊢ u ⇐⇒
b u′ : U terminates. If this one is successful, then by soundness of
algorithmic equality, ∆ ⊢ u = u′ : U , which implies ∆ ⊢ T [u/x] = T ′ [u′ /x].
Case Neutral irrelevant application with typing
∆ ⊢ n : (x÷U1 ) → T1
∆ ⊢ u ÷ U1
÷
∆ ⊢ n u : T1 [u/x]
and algorithmic self-equality
∆ ⊢ n ←→ n : (x÷U ) → T
∆ ⊢ n ÷ u ←→
b n ÷ u : T [u/x]
∆ ⊢ u′ ÷ U1′
∆ ⊢ n′ : (x÷U1′ ) → T1′
∆ ⊢ n′ ÷ u′ : T1′ [u′ /x]
∆ ⊢ n′ ←→ n′ : (x÷U ′ ) → T ′
∆ ⊢ n′ ÷ u′ ←→
b n′ ÷ u′ : T ′ [u′ /x]
The query ∆ ⊢ n ÷ u ←→
b n′ ÷ u′ : ? invokes query ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n′ : ?, which terminates
by induction hypothesis. If successfully, then ∆ ⊢ (x÷U1 ) → T1 (x÷U ) → T =
(x÷U ′ ) → T ′ = (x÷U1′ ) → T1′ . By function type injectivity, ∆ ⊢ U1 = U = U ′ = U1′
and ∆. x÷U ⊢ T1 = T = T ′ = T1′ . By conversion ∆ ⊢ u = u′ ÷ U , thus, ∆ ⊢
T1 [u/x] = T [u/x] = T ′ [u′ /x] = T1′ [u′ /x].
Case In all other cases, the query ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : ? fails immediately.
Case The query ∆ ⊢ n ←→ n : ? spawns subquery ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : ? which terminates
′
by induction hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n : T and ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : T ′ . If successfully,
it returns type T , and since T ց A, the original query also terminates, returning A.
(3) Type-directed equality.
Case Function type ∆ ⊢ t, t′ : (x⋆U ) → T . The query ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : (x⋆U ) → T
spawns subquery ∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x ⇐⇒
b t′ ⋆ : T . Since ∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x, t′ ⋆ x : T and the
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
33
subquery terminates by induction hypothesis on ∆. x⋆U ⊢ t ⋆ x ⇐⇒
b t ⋆ x : T and
′
⋆
′
⋆
∆. x⋆U ⊢ t x ⇐⇒
b t x : T.
Case Sort ∆ ⊢ T, T ′ : s. The query ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒ T ′ : s calls ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T ′ , which
terminates by induction hypothesis on ∆ ⊢ T ⇐⇒
b T and ∆ ⊢ T ′ ⇐⇒
b T ′.
Case Neutral type N .
t′ ց n ′
∆ ⊢ n′ ←→
b n′ : T ′
tցn
∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n:T
∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t : N
∆ ⊢ t′ ⇐⇒ t′ : N
′
The query ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t : N first weak head normalizes t and t′ . By assumption,
t ց n and t′ ց n′ , so this terminates. The subquery ∆ ⊢ n ←→
b n′ : ? terminates
by induction hypothesis. Thus, the whole query terminates.
Case If A is neither a function type, a sort, or a neutral type, the query ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A
fails immediately.
Case The query ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T first weak head normalizes T which terminates since
T ց A by assumption. Then it calls ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒ t′ : A which terminates by induction
hypothesis.
Theorem 6.6. If ∆ ⊢ t : T and ∆ ⊢ t′ : T then the query ∆ ⊢ t ⇐⇒
b t′ : T terminates.
Proof. From the lemma by completeness of algorithmic equality.
Thus we have shown that algorithmic equality is correct, i. e., sound, complete, and
terminating. Together, this entails decidability of equality in IITT.
Theorem 6.7 (Decidability of IITT).
(1) Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T is decidable.
(2) Γ ⊢ t : T is decidable.
Proof. Decidability of equality follows from soundness (Thm. 5.12), completeness (Thm. 6.4),
and termination (Thm. 6.6). Decidability of typing follows from decidability of type conversion, weak head normalization, and function type injectivity, using inversion (Lemma 5.5)
on typing derivations. Any reasonable type inference algorithm will do.
7. Extensions
Data types and recursion. The semantics of IITT is ready to cope with inductive data types
like the natural numbers and the associated recursion principles. Recursion into types, aka
known as large elimination, is also accounted for since we have universes and a semantics
which does not erase dependencies (unlike Pfenning’s model [Pfe01]).
Types with extensionality principles. One purpose of having a typed equality algorithm is
to handle η-laws that are not connected to the shape of the expression (like η-contraction
for functions) but to the shape of the type only. Typically these are types T with at most
one inhabitant, i. e., the empty type, the unit type, singleton types or propositions.6 For
such T we have the η-law
Γ ⊢ t, t′ : T
Γ ⊢ t = t′ : T
6Some care is necessary for the type of Leibniz equality [Abe09, Wer08].
34
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
which can only be checked in the presence of type T . Realizing such η-laws gives additional
“proof” irrelevance which is not covered by Pfenning’s irrelevant quantification (x÷U ) → T .
Internal erasure. Terms u÷U in irrelevant position are only there to please the type checker,
they are ignored during equality checking. This can be inferred from the substitution
principle: If Γ. x÷U ⊢ T and Γ ⊢ u, u′ ÷ U , then Γ ⊢ T [u/x] = T [u′ /x]; the type T has the
same shape regardless of u, u′ . Hence, terms like u serve the sole purpose to prove some
proposition and could be replaced by a dummy • immediately after type-checking.
Internal erasure can be realized by making Γ ⊢ t ÷ T a judgement (as opposed to just
a notation for Γ÷ ⊢ t : T ) and adding the rule
Γ ⊢ t÷T
.
Γ ⊢•÷T
The rule states that if there is already a proof t of T , then • is a new proof of T . This
preserves provability while erasing the proof terms. Conservativity of this rule can be proven
as in joint work of the author with Coquand and Pagano [ACP11].
8. Conclusions
We have extended Pfenning’s notion of irrelevance to a type theory IITT with universes
that accommodates types defined by recursion. We have constructed a Kripke model s
that shows soundness of IITT, yielding normalization, subject reduction and consistency,
plus syntactical properties of the judgements of IITT. A second Kripke logical relation c
has proven correctness of algorithmic equality and, thus, decidability of IITT.
Integrating irrelevance and data types in dependent type theory does not seem without
challenges. We have succeeded to treat Pfenning’s notion of irrelevance, but our proof
does not scale directly to parametric function types, a stronger notion of irrelevant function
types called implicit quantification by Miquel [Miq01b].7 Two more type theories build
on Miquel’s calculus [Miq01a], Barras and Bernardo’s ICC∗ [BB08] and Mishra-Linger and
Sheard’s Erasure Pure Type Systems (EPTS) [MLS08], but none has offered a satisfying
account of large eliminations yet. Miquel’s model [Miq00] features data types only as
impredicative encodings. For irrelevant, parametric, and recursive functions to coexist
it seems like three different function types are necessary, e. g., in the style of Pfenning’s
irrelevance, extensionality and intensionality. We would like to solve this puzzle in future
work, not least to implement high-performance languages with dependent types.
Acknowledgments. The first author thanks Bruno Barras, Bruno Bernardo, Thierry Coquand, Dan Doel, Hugo Herbelin, Conor McBride, Ulf Norell, and Jason Reed for discussions
on irrelevance in type theory. Work on a previous paper has been carried out while he was
invited researcher at PPS, Paris, in the INRIA πr 2 team headed by Pierre-Louis Curien and
Hugo Herbelin. The second author acknowledges financial support by the École Normale
Superiéure de Paris for his internship at the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München from
May to September 2011. We thank the two anonymous referees, who suggested changes
and examples which significantly improved the presentation, and the patience of the editors
waiting for our revisions.
7A function argument is parametric if it is irrelevant for computing the function result while the type of
the result may depend on it. In Pfenning’s notion, the argument must also be irrelevant in the type.
IRRELEVANCE IN TYPE THEORY
35
References
[AB04]
Steven Awodey and Andrej Bauer. Propositions as [Types]. Journal of Logic and Computation,
14(4):447–471, 2004.
[Abe09]
Andreas Abel. Extensional normalization in the logical framework with proof irrelevant equality.
In Olivier Danvy, editor, Workshop on Normalization by Evaluation, affiliated to LiCS 2009, Los
Angeles, 15 August 2009, 2009.
[Abe11]
Andreas Abel. Irrelevance in type theory with a heterogeneous equality judgement. In Martin
Hofmann, editor, Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, 14th International Conference, FOSSACS 2011, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory
and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2011, Saarbrücken, Germany, March 26 - April 3, 2011. Proceedings, volume 6604 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 57–71. Springer-Verlag, 2011.
[AC07]
Andreas Abel and Thierry Coquand. Untyped algorithmic equality for Martin-Löf’s logical framework with surjective pairs. Fundamenta Informaticae, 77(4):345–395, 2007. TLCA’05 special issue.
[ACD07] Andreas Abel, Thierry Coquand, and Peter Dybjer. Normalization by evaluation for Martin-Löf
Type Theory with typed equality judgements. In 22nd IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer
Science (LICS 2007), 10-12 July 2007, Wroclaw, Poland, Proceedings, pages 3–12. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2007.
[ACD08] Andreas Abel, Thierry Coquand, and Peter Dybjer. Verifying a semantic βη-conversion test for
Martin-Löf type theory. In Philippe Audebaud and Christine Paulin-Mohring, editors, Mathematics of Program Construction, 9th International Conference, MPC 2008, Marseille, France,
July 15-18, 2008. Proceedings, volume 5133 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 29–56.
Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[ACP11] Andreas Abel, Thierry Coquand, and Miguel Pagano. A modular type-checking algorithm for
type theory with singleton types and proof irrelevance. Logical Methods in Computer Science,
7(2:4):1–57, May 2011.
[Ada06]
Robin Adams. Pure type systems with judgemental equality. Journal of Functional Programming,
16(2):219–246, 2006.
[All87]
Stuart Allen. A Non-Type-Theoretic Semantics for Type-Theoretic Language. PhD thesis, Cornell
University, 1987.
[Ama08] Roberto M. Amadio, editor. Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, 11th
International Conference, FOSSACS 2008, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on
Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2008, Budapest, Hungary, March 29 - April 6, 2008.
Proceedings, volume 4962 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
[Aug99]
Lennart Augustsson. Cayenne - a language with dependent types. In Proceedings of the third
ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Functional Programming (ICFP ’98), Baltimore,
Maryland, USA, September 27-29, 1998, volume 34 of SIGPLAN Notices, pages 239–250. ACM
Press, 1999.
[Bar84]
Henk Barendregt. The Lambda Calculus: Its Syntax and Semantics. North Holland, Amsterdam,
1984.
[BB08]
Bruno Barras and Bruno Bernardo. The implicit calculus of constructions as a programming
language with dependent types. In Amadio [Ama08], pages 365–379.
[BDN09] Ana Bove, Peter Dybjer, and Ulf Norell. A brief overview of Agda - a functional language with
dependent types. In Stefan Berghofer, Tobias Nipkow, Christian Urban, and Makarius Wenzel,
editors, Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, 22nd International Conference, TPHOLs 2009,
Munich, Germany, August 17-20, 2009. Proceedings, volume 5674 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 73–78. Springer-Verlag, 2009.
[CAB+ 86] Robert L. Constable, Stuart F. Allen, Mark Bromley, Rance Cleaveland, J. F. Cremer, Robert W.
Harper, Douglas J. Howe, Todd B. Knoblock, Nax P. Mendler, Prakash Panangaden, James T.
Sasaki, and Scott F. Smith. Implementing mathematics with the Nuprl proof development system.
Prentice Hall, 1986.
[Coq91]
Thierry Coquand. An algorithm for testing conversion in type theory. In G. Huet and G. Plotkin,
editors, Logical Frameworks, pages 255–279. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[Coq96]
Thierry Coquand. An algorithm for type-checking dependent types. In Mathematics of Program
Construction. Selected Papers from the Third International Conference on the Mathematics of
36
A. ABEL AND G. SCHERER
Program Construction (July 17–21, 1995, Kloster Irsee, Germany), volume 26 of Science of
Computer Programming, pages 167–177. Elsevier, May 1996.
[Gog94]
Healfdene Goguen. A Typed Operational Semantics for Type Theory. PhD thesis, University of
Edinburgh, August 1994. Available as LFCS Report ECS-LFCS-94-304.
[Gog00]
Healfdene Goguen. A Kripke-style model for the admissibility of structural rules. In Paul
Callaghan, Zhaohui Luo, James McKinna, and Robert Pollack, editors, Types for Proofs and
Programs, International Workshop, TYPES 2000, Durham, UK, December 8-12, 2000, Selected
Papers, volume 2277 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 112–124. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[Gog05]
Healfdene Goguen. Justifying algorithms for βη conversion. In Vladimiro Sassone, editor, Foundations of Software Science and Computational Structures, 8th International Conference, FoSSaCS 2005, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software,
ETAPS 2005, Edinburgh, UK, April 4-8, 2005, Proceedings, volume 3441 of Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, pages 410–424. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
[HP05]
Robert Harper and Frank Pfenning. On equivalence and canonical forms in the LF type theory.
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic, 6(1):61–101, 2005.
[INR10]
INRIA. The Coq Proof Assistant Reference Manual. INRIA, version 8.3 edition, 2010.
[Let02]
Pierre Letouzey. A new extraction for Coq. In Herman Geuvers and Freek Wiedijk, editors,
Types for Proofs and Programs, Second International Workshop, TYPES 2002, Berg en Dal,
The Netherlands, April 24-28, 2002, Selected Papers, volume 2646 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 200–219. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
[Miq00]
Alexandre Miquel. A model for impredicative type systems, universes, intersection types and
subtyping. In 15th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2000), 26-29 June
2000, Santa Barbara, California, USA, Proceedings, pages 18–29, 2000.
[Miq01a] Alexandre Miquel. The implicit calculus of constructions. In Samson Abramsky, editor, Typed
Lambda Calculi and Applications, 5th International Conference, TLCA 2001, Krakow, Poland,
May 2-5, 2001, Proceedings, volume 2044 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 344–359.
Springer-Verlag, 2001.
[Miq01b] Alexandre Miquel. Le Calcul des Constructions implicite: syntaxe et sémantique. PhD thesis,
Université Paris 7, December 2001.
[ML08]
Richard Nathan Mishra-Linger. Irrelevance, Polymorphism, and Erasure in Type Theory. PhD
thesis, Portland State University, 2008.
[MLS08] Nathan Mishra-Linger and Tim Sheard. Erasure and polymorphism in pure type systems. In
Amadio [Ama08], pages 350–364.
[MM04]
Conor McBride and James McKinna. The view from the left. Journal of Functional Programming,
14(1):69–111, 2004.
[Pfe01]
Frank Pfenning. Intensionality, extensionality, and proof irrelevance in modal type theory. In
16th IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 2001), 16-19 June 2001, Boston
University, USA, Proceedings. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2001.
[PMW93] Christine Paulin-Mohring and Benjamin Werner. Synthesis of ML programs in the system Coq.
Journal of Symbolic Computation, 15(5/6):607–640, 1993.
[Ree02]
Jason Reed. Proof irrelevance and strict definitions in a logical framework, 2002. Senior Thesis,
published as Carnegie-Mellon University technical report CMU-CS-02-153.
[Ree03]
Jason Reed. Extending higher-order unification to support proof irrelevance. In David A. Basin
and Burkhart Wolff, editors, Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, 16th International Conference, TPHOLs 2003, Rom, Italy, September 8-12, 2003, Proceedings, volume 2758 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 238–252. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
[SS08]
Carsten Schürmann and Jeffrey Sarnat. Structural logical relations. In Frank Pfenning, editor,
Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS
2008, 24-27 June 2008, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pages 69–80. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2008.
[VC02]
Joseph C. Vanderwaart and Karl Crary. A simplified account of the metatheory of Linear LF. In
Third International Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Metalanguages (LFM 2002), FLoC’02
affiliated workshop, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2002. An extended version appeared as CMU Technical Report CMU-CS-01-154.
[Wer08]
Benjamin Werner. On the strength of proof-irrelevant type theories. Logical Methods in Computer
Science, 4(3), 2008.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License. To view
a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/ or send a
letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second St, Suite 300, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA, or
Eisenacher Strasse 2, 10777 Berlin, Germany
| 6cs.PL
|
A Method for Reducing the Severity of Epidemics by
Allocating Vaccines According to Centrality
Krzysztof Drewniak
[email protected]
Joseph Helsing
[email protected]
arXiv:1407.7288v1 [cs.SI] 27 Jul 2014
ABSTRACT
One long-standing question in epidemiological research is
how best to allocate limited amounts of vaccine or similar
preventative measures in order to minimize the severity of
an epidemic. Much of the literature on the problem of vaccine allocation has focused on influenza epidemics and used
mathematical models of epidemic spread to determine the
effectiveness of proposed methods. Our work applies computational models of epidemics to the problem of geographically allocating a limited number of vaccines within several Texas counties. We developed a graph-based, stochastic
model for epidemics that is based on the SEIR model, and
tested vaccine allocation methods based on multiple centrality measures. This approach provides an alternative method
for addressing the vaccine allocation problem, which can be
combined with more conventional approaches to yield more
effective epidemic suppression strategies. We found that allocation methods based on in-degree and inverse betweenness centralities tended to be the most effective at containing
epidemics.
Categories and Subject Descriptors
J.3 [Life and Medical Sciences]: Health; G.2.2 [Discrete
Mathematics]: Graph Theory—Graph algorithms
General Terms
Algorithms, Experimentation, Performance
Keywords
Computational epidemiology, health informatics, vaccine distribution, centrality measures
1.
INTRODUCTION
One long-standing question in epidemiological research is
how best to allocate limited amounts of vaccine or similar
preventative measures in order to minimize the severity of
an epidemic. Discovering a way to reduce the severity of
epidemics would benefit society by not only preventing loss
Armin R Mikler
[email protected]
of life, but also reducing the overall disease burden of those
epidemics. These burdens, or societal costs, can be seen in
reduced economic productivity due to widespread sickness,
or increased strain on health infrastructure.
Much of the literature on the problem of vaccine allocation
has focused on influenza epidemics and has used mathematical models of epidemic spread to determine the effectiveness
of proposed methods [12, 13, 17, 22, 24]. Most investigations
of vaccine allocation performed their analyses on geographically large scales and focused on determining which subpopulations should be prioritized for vaccination. Since previous research focuses on large-scale, subpopulation-based
models, our work explores alternative approaches to the
question of vaccine allocation.
Much work has been devoted to the development of computational models for disease simulation. Mikler et. al. have
developed multiple stochastic models of disease spread in
a population, which use the standard SEIR(S) model [15,
19]. Some of these models, such as their Global Stochastic
Cellular Automata model [16], can be adapted to the problem of vaccine allocation. Simulation techniques relevant to
our work have been developed by Indrakanti [10], who implemented a SEIR-based framework for simulating epidemic
spread within a county.
Our work applies computational models of epidemics to the
problem of geographically allocating a limited number of
vaccines within several Texas counties. We developed a
graph-based, stochastic model for epidemics that is based
on the SEIR model and the work of Mikler et. al. [16]. Various centrality measures have been proposed over the years
[18, 2, 3, 7, 4], mainly in the field of social network analysis,
which provide means for determining which nodes in a graph
are the most important. Our model was then used to investigate various centrality-based vaccine allocation strategies, in
which vaccines are allocated to various census blocks within
the county in order of their centrality measure score. This
approach provides an alternative method for addressing the
vaccine allocation problem, which can be combined with
more conventional approaches to yield more effective epidemic suppression strategies. In this paper, we present the
results of several experiments with centrality-based vaccine
allocation strategies. These experiments were performed on
graphs constructed from the census data of several Texas
counties, and have yielded results that indicate directions
for further study.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 Vaccine Allocation
Several authors have previously addressed the problem of
vaccine allocation. Medlock and Galvani have investigated
the question of which groups should be prioritized for influenza vaccination throughout the United States in the event
of a shortage [13]. They developed a model, parameterized with real-world data, for analyzing various vaccination strategies under multiple effectiveness criteria. Medlock
and Galvani found that optimal epidemic control could be
achieved by targeting adults between the ages of 30 and 39
and children, and that current CDC vaccine allocation recommendations were suboptimal under all considered measures. Tuite et. al. used similar methods to investigate
vaccine allocation strategies in Canada during a H1N1 epidemic [22]. They found that targeting high-risk groups, such
as people with chronic medical conditions, and then targeting age groups, such as children, that are the most likely
to develop complications after influenza infection will cause
the greatest reduction in the number of deaths and serious
illnesses caused by an influenza epidemic.
Similar work was performed by Matrajt and Longini [12].
In their work, Matrajt and Longini attempted to determine
whether the optimal vaccine allocation strategy varies with
the state of the epidemic. They developed an SIR-based
model to analyze the spread of influenza among and between several groups of people in idealized countries, and
used criteria similar to those of Medlock and Galvani to ascertain the effectiveness of their methods. The authors determined that the demographic structure of the population
in an area significantly affects the optimal allocation strategy. They also found that, at the beginning of an epidemic,
those groups that are the most likely to transmit influenza
should be targeted immediately, while the groups that are
most vulnerable should be targeted after a point before, but
near, the peak of the epidemic. The work of Mylius et.
al modeled influenza epidemics and found that individuals
that are most at risk for complications should be targeted
if additional vaccines become available during an epidemic
[17]. Mylius et. al. also found that schoolchildren should be
prioritized for vaccination at the beginning of an epidemic,
as they are heavily involved in disease transmission. Their
conclusions bear a close resemblance to those of Matrajt and
Longini.
The problem of large-scale vaccine allocations were addressed
by [12, 13, 17, 22]. They used different models to reach their
conclusions, but used similar metrics, such as the reduction
in the predicted number of deaths from a disease after the
vaccination program, to assess the significance of their results. None of these works addressed the question of vaccine
allocation at the level of counties or other similar geographic
divisions, nor did they address the vaccine allocation problem from a geographic perspective.
Another approach to the vaccine allocation problem, which
we extend in our work, can be found in the work of Johnson [11]. Johnson’s approach, unlike those of many other
researchers, focuses on vaccine allocation in the small scale.
Johnson generated synthetic social network graphs and used
various measures of centrality to determine which individuals within those graphs should be vaccinated. Her results
showed that the optimal vaccination strategy depends on the
structure of the social network it is applied to. Our work
adapts Johnson’s methods to the problem of allocating vaccinations within a county.
2.2
Centrality and its Applications
The notion of centrality has been used in various fields, most
notably in the study of social networks. Multiple centrality
measures exist, all of which allow the vertices of a graph
to be ranked in order of their importance. Out-Degree and
in-degree centralities were first defined by Nieminen [18].
In those measures, the centrality c of a node n in a graph
G = (V, E), where V is the set of nodes in the graph, u and
v are nodes in V, E is the set of edges, and |V | is the number
of nodes is
dn
(1)
c=
|V | − 1
where dn is the out-degree or in-degree of n.
Eigenvector centrality, first proposed by Bonacich [2], of a
graph G = (V, E) can be calculated by representing G as an
adjacency matrix A, where
(
1 if (u, v) ∈ E
Auv =
(2)
0 if (u, v) 6∈ E
Then, the eigenvector centrality x is defined as
Ax = λx
(3)
where λ is the largest eigenvalue of A. Eigenvector centrality
is useful because it gives a higher centrality score to a highdegree node that is connected to other high-degree nodes
than to a high-degree node connected to low-degree nodes
[3].
Another important measure of centrality is betweenness centrality. Betweenness centrality, first described by Freeman
[7], is defined as follows, for a node n in a graph G = (V, E),
where dst (n) is the number of shortest paths from s ∈ V to
t ∈ V that include n, and dst is the number of shortest paths
from s to t where the shortest path between two nodes is the
path where the sum of the weights of its edges is minimized
X dst (n)
(4)
dst
s6=n6=t∈V
Betweenness centrality gives higher centrality scores to nodes
that are most likely to be involved in the transmission of information throughout a graph [4].
Centrality has been applied to multiple epidemiological questions. Rothenberg et. al. applied various centrality measures to a social network graph generated from CDC data
on the spread of HIV in Colorado Springs [20]. Rothenberg
analyzed the collected data under multiple centrality measures and found that all of the measures identified all but
one of the HIV cases as non-central. Their work also noted
several differences in response patterns to the CDC questionnaire between people with high centrality and people
with low centrality under all measures, which were closely
correlated.
Similar work was also performed by Christley et. al. [6].
Christley generated synthetic social networks and performed
SIR-based simulations in order to study the applicability of
centrality to the problem of identifying individuals at high
risk of HIV infection. They found that degree centrality
performed no worse than other centrality measures, such as
betweenness, but noted that the results might not be valid
for larger datasets.
Centrality has also played a key role in Johnson’s work,
which was discussed previously [11]. Johnson investigated
how vaccinating those individuals identified as central in a
social network would affect the spread of disease in that network. Johnson found that vaccination strategies based on
centrality measures were an effective means of mitigating
outbreaks. Related work was performed by Rustam, who
applied centrality to the spread of viruses and worms in
computer networks [21]. He found that nodes with high centrality scores have a large amount of influence on the spread
of a virus, especially when those nodes are rated central by
multiple measures.
2.3
Computational Simulation of Epidemics
Several methods for simulating epidemics computationally
are based on the SEIR model of epidemics [15, 19, 16, 10]. In
the SEIR model, the population is divided into four classes:
susceptible individuals, who can become infected; exposed
or latent individuals, who have been infected but are not capable of spreading the infection; infectious individuals, who
can spread the disease to susceptible individuals; and recovered individuals, who can no longer be infected. Mikler et.
al. proposed a SEIR-based model that uses a stochastic cellular automaton [16]. The concepts used in their model are
applicable to a wide range of epidemic simulations.
Agent-based and metapopulation models are the two dominant methods for computational epidemic simulation [1]. In
agent-based models, each individual within the population is
simulated. Such models, which are often implemented using
cellular automata [16, 15, 8], are useful because they provide
insights into the progression of the disease. However, they
are impractical when large populations need to be simulated
due to space required for information about each agent in
the simulation. Metapopulation models, on the other hand,
break the population into subpopulations and then simulate
the interactions between and within the subpopulations [10,
23]. Such models sacrifice some of the precision offered by
agent-based modeling in exchange for the ability to simulate
large populations. Our work uses a metapopulation-based
model, where each census block constitutes a subpopulation. This helps to overcome the excessive computational
resources that would be required to simulate hundreds of
thousands of individuals.
A closely related model that we have adapted for our own
work has been developed by Indrakanti [10]. Indrakanti developed a county-level epidemic simulator, which uses census
blocks as the base unit of simulation. The model allows for
contacts to be generated between any two census blocks,
and uses an interaction coefficient to determine the likelihood of contact. The model was used to conduct several
experiments which found that epidemics with higher infectivity (likelihood of spread during a contact) reached their
peak percentage of infected individuals earlier. It also discovered that the distribution of population between census
blocks had a significant effect on the spread of disease.
3. METHODS
3.1 Representing Counties
The United States Census Bureau provides geographic data
on US counties. They subdivide counties into census blocks
at the finest granularity, which are typically bounded by
roads, streets, or water features. Being that they may be
varying sizes and shapes, rural census blocks are often significantly larger than urban ones. Additionally, the population of a census block may vary greatly as there are many
cencus-blocks that contain zero population, i.e. farmland,
greenspace, or bodies of water, and others that contain highdesntiy residential structures, i.e. appartment buildings,
that may have several hundred people [5]. This geographic
data, along with the population of each census block, was
obtained for multiple Texas counties, specifically Rockwall,
Hays, and Denton County, and was stored in a PostGIS
database. The centroid of each census block, which is the
average of the points defining the census block, was precomputed and stored within the database.
After the census block data was obtained, several methods for representing a county as a graph with census block
nodes were investigated. Rockwall County was used for
these investigations due to its small size, allowing centrality measures to be computed quickly. All of these representations were based on various methods of constructing
a graph G = (V, E) to represent a county, where V , the
set of nodes, was the set of populated census blocks in the
county. Our first approach to representing counties as a
graph, which was ineffective, was a representation where
E = {(u, v) | u, v ∈ V, u 6= v, ST Touches(u, v)}. The
ST Touches() function, which determines whether two geographic entities are adjacent, was provided by PostGIS.
This representation used undirected edges. Another of our
early attempts was an approach where E = {(u, v) | u, v ∈
V, u 6= v, ST Distance(Centroid(u), v) < r} for various constant values of r, where the ST Distance() function was used
to compute the shortest distance between the centroid of u
and the block v. The Centroid() function retrieves the centroid of a block from the database. A variation of this approach where the r value for each node u ∈ V was lowered
by multiplying it by
1−
Population(u)
1000
(5)
on the assumption that the population of highly-populated
blocks was more likely to interact within the block than
that of sparsely-populated blocks was also investigated. All
of these approaches were ineffective and gave unrealistic results, such as the identification of a large rural block with a
population of 5 as the most central block within Rockwall
County. Therefore, they were rejected in favor of a representation based on weighted edges.
The results of our investigations led us to use the following
method to represent US counties in our experiments. In our
final model, the county was represented as a directed graph
G = (V, E), where V was the set of populated census blocks.
The set of edges E was equal to {(u, v, Wu→v | u ∈ V, v ∈
V, u 6= v}, where Wu→v was the weight of the edge from u
to v. The weights were computed by the following formula,
which was adapted from the work of Mikler et. al.[16]:
Wu→v =
Population(u) × Population(v)
10000 × ST Distance(Centroid(u), v) + 0.00001
(6)
This definition assigns higher weights to blocks that are
more likely to interact, a fact that is used in our simulator.
The multiplication by 1/10000 was included to offset the behavior of ST Distance(), which returns distance as real value
less than 1. If the distances were left unscaled, the division
could have produced weights outside of the range that can
be accurately represented by real values in a computer. The
addition of 0.00001 was used to address cases where the centroid of block u is located within block v, which ordinarily
results in a distance of 0, from producing an error. Once
these weights were computed, the graphs were represented
using the NetworkX library [9].
3.2
Centrality Measures
We modified the centrality measures described in section 2.2
to work with our representation. Code from [9] was used as
a basis for our work. Out-degree and in-degree centralities
were trivially adapted; the out-degree and in-degree of a
node were redefined to be the sum of the weights of the outedges or in-edges, respectively, instead of a count of those
edges. The implementation of eigenvector centrality in NetworkX already allowed for weighted edges, so it was used
without modification. Since that implementation of eigenvector centrality used only the out-edges for its computations, a variation of the measure, eigenvector-in centrality,
was also tested where the in-edges were used instead.
Betweenness centrality was the most heavily modified measure. Since betweenness centrality relies on shortest paths,
the reciprocals of all edge weights were taken before centrality computation, so that the shortest path between nodes
s and t is the one that the disease is most likely to spread
across. Afterwards, the betweenness centrality scores were
computed by a variation of Brandes’s algorithm [4], where
Dijkstra’s algorithm was applied to each node in parallel
as opposed to sequentially. This modification was found to
have no effect on the results of the centrality computation.
The centrality measure described above was reported as inverse betweenness centrality.
Finally, we defined random centrality, which is not a centrality measure, for use as a baseline. In random centrality,
each node is assigned a random real value in [0, 1), which is
used as its centrality score. The results of all centrality calculations except random centrality, which was re-computed
before each set of simulations, were saved to avoid expensive
recomputation when multiple experiments were performed
on the same data.
3.3
Graph-Based Stochastic Epidemic Simulation
A stochastic epidemic simulator based on the SEIR model
and the work of [10] was developed for use with our representation of counties. The simulation began by constructing
the graph G = (V, E) as described above, and computing all
centrality measures that were to be tested. Each node n ∈ V
was labeled with the following attributes: |Nn |, the total
Figure 1: An illustration of the grouping of census
blocks that have been split by the simulator.
population of the block, |Sn | = |Nn |, the number of susceptibles, and |En |, |In |, |Rn | = 0, where |En | is the number of
latent (exposed) individuals in the block, |In | the number
of infectious, and |Rn | the number of recovered individuals.
Throughout the simulation, |Sn + En + In + Rn | = |Nn |. In
addition to these counts, each node was labeled with a mapping ME,n = {0 7→ E0,n , 1 7→ E1,n . . . Tlp 7→ ETlp ,n }, where
Tlp is the latent period and Em,n is the number of people
in block n with 0 ≤ m ≤ Tlp days remaining until they
transition to the next simulation state. In this mapping,
Tlp
X
Em,n = |En |. A similar mapping was also produced for
m=0
the infectious period, MI,n = {0 7→ I0,n . . . Tip 7→ ITip ,n ,
where Tip is the infectious period. For this mapping, 0 ≤
m ≤ Tip , similarly to ME,n . These attributes are illustrated
in Figure 1.
For the purposes of experimentation, 20 simulation sets were
performed in parallel, with the random number generator reseeded for each set. Each set consisted of multiple simulations with varying values of available vaccine and centrality
measures. The simulations were performed on a server with
four six-core Intel Xeon E7540 processors and 256 GB of
RAM.
At the beginning of each set, a proportion p of the census
blocks were chosen randomly for initial infection, which remained constant throughout all simulations in the set. The
percentage of the population infected initially was varied
between experiments. Vaccines were distributed to the entire population of each chosen census until the total supply
of vaccines was exhausted. Census blocks were selected for
vaccination in a decreasing order based on their centrality.
The centrality measure used to allocate vaccines was varied
between experiments so that the measures could be compared for effectiveness. The set of population (blocks) that
was initially targeted for infection was held constant as the
centrality measure and percent of population that was able
to receive vaccination were varied. This allowed us to more
accurately determine which centrality measure or measures
were most effective under varying conditions. In experiments involving the prevention scenario, vaccines were distributed before the initial infection, while they were dis-
Contact rate
Transmissibility
Mobility
Latent period (Tlp )
Infectious period (Tip )
Percentage of blocks to infect (p)
20
0.05
0.99
2 days
3 days
1%
Table 1: Parameters kept constant throughout all
experiments. These parameters serve to characterize the disease being simulated.
Figure 2: An illustration of the infection process
used by the simulator.
tributed six simulated days after initial infection in the intervention scenario. The value of six days was chosen because
at the beginning of day six the initial cases would have transitioned to the recovered state. After the initial infections,
which were recorded as day zero and placed those affected
into ETE ,n , the simulation was executed until no latent or
infectious individuals remained in the population.
During each day, after any scheduled vaccine distribution,
each block’s ME and MI is updated by setting ME = {i ∈
ME 7→ ME (i + 1), Tlp 7→ 0}, and similarly for MI . After
these updates, the census blocks are iterated over. For each
block n , i contacts are simulated, where i is In multiplied
by the contact rate, 20 contacts/day, which was taken from
[10]. For each contact, a random real value in [0, 1) is generated. If this number is greater than or equal to the mobility
parameter, which was 0.99, the contact takes place within n,
otherwise, the contact takes place within a different census
block. The mobility parameter expresses the likelihood that
an individual will contact someone who resides in a census
block that the individual does not reside in.
In the case of non-local contacts, i.e. contacts made between
agents in separate blocks, the external block is chosen by the
following method. First, the weights (given by Equation 6)
of the out-edges of the originating block are normalized by
dividing by the out-degree of the block and then sorted in
descending order. These values were precomputed once as
an optimization. A random target value in [0, 1) is generated, and the list of weights is summed element by element
until the sum is greater than or equal to the target value.
The node t whose associated weight causes the summation
to terminate is chosen as the block for contact. This process
is illustrated by Figure 2.
Once the block that will be contacted is chosen, a diseasespreading contact occurs if a random real number in [0, 1)
is less than the transmissibility parameter, which was 0.05.
For non-local contacts, this test is performed before block
selection to speed up the simulation significantly. When the
contact occurs, one person is, if possible, removed from St ,
the susceptible population of the target block t, and added to
Et , the latent population. The new infection is also added to
MEt (Tlp ), which ensures that the newly-infected individual
remains in the latent period for Tlp days before becoming
infectious.
After all the contacts are generated, the SEIR states are
updated. For each block n ∈ V , MEn (0) people are removed
from En , and added to MIn (Tip ) and In . Similarly, MIn (0)
people are transferred from In to Rn . At the conclusion of
the updates, the number of people throughout the county in
each SEIR state and the percentage of the population in that
state are reported. In addition, the number of people who
are infected, that is, either latent or infectious, is reported,
along with the associated percentage.
3.4
Experiments and Parameters
In all of the experiments performed, the parameters listed
in Table 1 were used. These parameters were not chosen to
reflect an extant disease, and were adapted from the work
of Indrakanti [10].
Experiments were performed on Rockwall, Hays, and Denton counties using two epidemic scenarios for each county.
In the prevention scenario, vaccines were distributed before
any infection took place, and 5 percent the population of
the blocks that were selected for infection was initially infected. In the intervention scenario 50 percent of the population of the infected blocks were infected initially, and at
the beginning of the 6th day of the simulation vaccines were
distributed. These scenarios were intended to simulate a
naturally-occurring epidemic of a disease such as influenza
or a random, mass-exposure bio-terror attack using perhaps
smallpox, respectively. Each combination of county and scenario received its own run of 20 simulation sets.
Within each simulation set, the following experiments were
performed. The initially infected blocks were held constant
for all of these experiments within a set. The amount of
vaccine available was varied between 30 percent, 50 percent, 75 percent, and 90 percent of the population of the
county. Out-degree, in-degree, eigenvector, eigenvector-in,
inverse betweenness, and random centralities were tested.
4.
RESULTS
In Tables 2 and 3, we present the average peak infected
percentage from our experiments. This data was obtained
by first finding the maximum percent infected for each simulation. Then, the maximums of each of the 20 simulations for each experiment were arithmetically averaged. The
maximum percentage infected at any given time indicates
the severity of the epidemic and, consequently, the strain
that epidemic places on health resources, such as hospitals.
These averages, along with their corresponding standard deviations, are reported in Table 2 for the prevention scenario,
and Table 3 for the intervention scenario. These results have
been rounded to four decimal places to avoid the appearance
Figure 5: 200 most central blocks in Hays County
according to multiple centrality measures.
Figure 3: Average total number of infected individuals vs. number of vaccines for Denton County
intervention scenario experiments, log scale.
of false precision.
We also obtained the total number of infected individuals
for each simulation execution. These totals allow us to
determine the severity of infections that do not result in
outbreaks. These results were averaged together on a perexperiment basis and plotted on a log scale. The plot for
an intervention scenario in Denton County is presented in
Figure 3.
We also plotted the average percentage of the population
that was in each state during every day of the simulation
for each experiment to better visualize the progress of the
simulated epidemics. Such a plot for a prevention scenario in
Hays County at 50 percent vaccination is included as Figure
4.
We used maps generated by QuantumGIS, which highlighted
approximately the top 10 percent most central blocks according to multiple centrality measures, to ensure that our
model was producing realistic results. These maps were also
used as an aid in the analysis of our results. A map of Hays
County, showing the 200 most central blocks according outdegree, in-degree, and inverse betweenness centralities, is included as Figure 5. This map was created by obtaining the
list of the 200 most central census blocks under each centrality measure and marking them with distinct colors. Blocks
that were central according to multiple centrality measures
received their own colors.
5.
DISCUSSION
We found that in-degree and inverse betweenness centralities tended to be the most effective at containing epidemics.
At low vaccination levels, such as 30 percent and 50 percent, where almost all of the population becomes infected
under all vaccination strategies, the peak infected percentage was used to compare the effectiveness of various strategies. Lowering the number of infected people at one time
reduces strain on public health infrastructure, allowing the
cases that exist to be treated more effectively. At higher vaccination levels, where no significant peak occurred, the state
totals, along with the plots of the course of the epidemics,
were used to determine effectiveness. The peaks were not
used to analyze vaccination effectiveness at the 75 percent
and 90 percent intervention experiments, as the peaks were
found to reflect the degree to which the disease had spread
before the vaccines were distributed, and to have little relation to the effectiveness of allocation strategies. These analyses allowed us to determine which of the tested vaccination
strategies was most effective at containing the disease.
In all but one of our experiments, at least one of in-degree
or inverse betweenness had lower peaks than the control,
which was utilizing a random vaccination strategy. Neither
measure had a lower peak significantly more times than the
other, which shows than inverse betweenness and in-degree
centralities are both effective in various situations. In-degree
was significantly more effective in the intervention scenario,
while inverse betweenness was more effective in the prevention scenario. In-degree centrality allocated vaccines to
those blocks that were the most vulnerable, that is, the most
likely to be contacted. Because it shielded vulnerable blocks
from the disease, in-degree was more effective at containing epidemics that had already begun to spread throughout
the county at the time of vaccination. Inverse betweenness
centrality, however, allocated vaccines to those blocks most
likely to be involved in disease transmission. This allocation
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
No vaccination
59.5177 (0.5823)
No vaccination
56.9851 (1.1604)
No vaccination
62.3313 (0.4791)
Prevention
30% (23501)
31.8124 (0.3003)
29.2634 (0.3717)
32.5062 (0.3980)
29.9352 (0.4541)
29.1990 (0.2862)
29.7944 (0.4934)
30% (47132)
32.6743 (0.3588)
26.1614 (0.5565)
28.1819 (0.2369)
27.7457 (0.3377)
28.0340 (0.4022)
29.3217 (0.3645)
30% (198784)
34.9600 (0.1829)
32.2106 (0.1637)
34.4785 (0.1946)
32.1597 (0.1371)
32.3480 (0.1617)
32.3165 (0.2183)
Scenario: Rockwall
50% (39168)
12.9924 (0.2802)
9.6473 (0.2685)
13.9375 (0.3912)
12.5988 (0.3685)
10.5134 (0.2083)
10.5293 (0.2976)
Hays County
50% (78553)
13.8937 (0.1090)
9.3640 (0.1403)
11.1222 (0.1744)
10.8385 (0.1924)
9.9216 (0.1894)
10.5042 (0.2072)
Denton County
50% (331307)
14.4588 (0.0759)
13.1199 (0.0911)
15.3266 (0.0855)
13.8856 (0.1084)
12.8719 (0.1070)
13.0035 (0.0921)
County
75% (58752)
0.0207 (0.0079)
0.0181 (0.0086)
1.4525 (0.7278)
1.1630 (0.6695)
0.0220 (0.0106)
0.0184 (0.0135)
90% (70503)
0.0073 (0.0030)
0.0051 (0.0051)
0.0079 (0.0038)
0.0077 (0.0037)
0.0068 (0.0030)
0.0060 (0.0081)
75% (117830)
0.0208 (0.0066)
0.0172 (0.0071)
0.0183 (0.0058)
0.0190 (0.0061)
0.0175 (0.0057)
0.0244 (0.0115)
90% (141396)
0.0053 (0.0029)
0.0059 (0.0036)
0.0052 (0.0023)
0.0050 (0.0025)
0.0062 (0.0025)
0.0095 (0.0094)
75% (496960)
0.0196 (0.0028)
0.0178 (0.0040)
0.0374 (0.0359)
0.0212 (0.0039)
0.0190 (0.0024)
0.0186 (0.0086)
90% (596353)
0.0059 (0.0014)
0.0057 (0.0020)
0.0058 (0.0014)
0.0058 (0.0014)
0.0057 (0.0016)
0.0061 (0.0038)
Table 2: For the prevention scenario, average peak infected percentage with standard deviation in parentheses.
Lowest values in boldface. Because there were no vaccines to be distributed, there is only one value for no
vaccination.
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
% pop (# vaccines)
Out-Degree
Inverse Betweenness
Eigenvector
Eigenvector-In
In-Degree
Random
No vaccination
59.3418 (1.0607)
No vaccination
58.0324 (1.8390)
No vaccination
62.8987 (0.5339)
Intervention Scenario: Rockwall County
30% (23501)
50% (39168)
75% (58752)
32.0758 (0.5265)
13.5754 (0.4445)
1.7544 (0.5848)
29.4420 (0.5808) 10.1374 (0.3663)
1.8280 (0.6144)
32.8470 (0.7541)
15.2428 (0.4611)
2.0908 (0.3910)
30.7960 (0.7225)
13.8876 (0.4673)
1.8606 (0.4803)
29.3326 (0.7046)
10.6855 (0.4030) 1.7150 (0.5744)
30.5434 (0.7600)
11.9360 (0.3728)
1.7970 (0.6138)
Hays County
30% (47132)
50% (78553)
75% (117830)
32.3683 (0.7623)
13.4622 (0.3566)
1.8578 (0.6219)
27.5758 (0.9813)
10.2484 (0.4134)
1.9364 (0.6338)
28.9617 (0.8530)
12.1266 (0.4515)
1.8978 (0.6402)
28.4758 (0.7967)
11.9360 (0.4113)
1.8689 (0.6336)
28.2601 (0.9398)
9.8329 (0.4272) 1.8171 (0.6087)
29.0436 (1.0581)
11.3709 (0.6273)
1.9226 (0.6457)
Denton County
30% (198784)
50% (331307)
75% (496960)
34.8273 (0.4330)
14.5756 (0.1599)
1.7676 (0.3085)
32.8160 (0.2959)
13.5322 (0.1470)
1.8390 (0.3245)
34.6035 (0.2898)
15.4285 (0.1743)
1.7687 (0.3033)
32.3856 (0.2001)
14.1328 (0.1577)
1.7384 (0.3112)
32.2367 (0.2579) 13.0264 (0.1090) 1.7361 (0.3060)
33.0462 (0.4129)
13.6822 (0.1478)
1.8266 (0.3223)
90% (70503)
1.6049 (0.5464)
1.6352 (0.5571)
1.6432 (0.5579)
1.6393 (0.5607)
1.6143 (0.5672)
1.6320 (0.5323)
90% (141396)
1.7342 (0.5743)
1.7479 (0.5707)
1.7367 (0.5627)
1.7339 (0.5832)
1.7230 (0.5756)
1.7459 (0.5652)
90% (596353)
1.6589 (0.2921)
1.6654 (0.3033)
1.6604 (0.2939)
1.6528 (0.2914)
1.6519 (0.2921)
1.6691 (0.3046)
Table 3: For the intervention scenario, average peak infected percentage with standard deviation in parentheses. Lowest values in boldface. Because there were no vaccines to be distributed, there is only one value
for no vaccination.
Figure 4: The average percentage of the population that was latent, infectious, or infected (either latent or
infectious) v. time for Hays County prevention scenario (50 percent vaccination). Points with a value of 0
were omitted from the graph.
strategy was more effective in the prevention scenario because it blocked off likely transmission paths, which would
have allowed the epidemic to spread quickly. Both of these
targeting methods appear to be effective at reducing the
severity of epidemics at the county level, though they are
effective in different scenarios. This conclusion agrees with
that of Matrajt and Longini, who found that vaccinating the
vulnerable and those likely to transmit the disease was an
optimal strategy at the national level [12].
Out-degree centrality was consistently the least effective method
of vaccination, with peaks higher than those of random vaccination in most of the 30 percent and 50 percent vaccination
experiments. This resulted from out-degree centrality’s tendency to allocate vaccines to high-population areas that are
likely to spread the disease once it reaches them, regardless
of their probability of infection. This result is supported by
Figure 5, which shows out-degree targeting mainly small,
urban blocks. Figure 5 also shows that out-degree centrality
selected different blocks than the effective measures, which
had many blocks in common.
At 75 percent vaccination, at least one of in-degree and
inverse betweenness was more effective at halting disease
spread than random vaccination in all experiments. Similar to the 30 percent and 50 percent levels of vaccination,
both measures were the most effective about half the time.
In-degree centrality tended to fall slightly faster than inverse betweenness at the beginning of the simulation, though
inverse betweenness was more effective at stopping disease
spread near the end of the simulation, a results that agrees
with those of Matrajt and Longini [12].
Effectively no disease spread occurred under all measures,
at 90 percent vaccination. As at previous vaccination levels,
in-degree and inverse betweenness were each most effective
in half of the experiments. The differences in effectiveness
in the prevention and intervention scenarios were much less
significant than at lower vaccination levels. The lack of significant disease spread at 90 percent was a consequence of
herd immunity, the primary factor influencing disease spread
at high vaccination levels [14]. Due to the initial unvaccinated period, epidemics in the intervention scenario at 90
percent vaccination tended to last longer than those in the
prevention scenario.
Eigenvector-based measures, especially eigenvector-in centrality, which targeted vulnerable blocks that were likely to
spread the disease to other vulnerable blocks, showed an interesting trend: their effectiveness increased with county size
and the prevalence of urban areas. In fact, in the prevention scenario at 30 percent vaccination in Denton County,
eigenvector-in centrality was the most effective, followed by
inverse betweenness. In Rockwall County, which is small and
sparsely populated, these measures were the worst performers. At 75 percent vaccination in Rockwall, eigenvector and
eigenvector-in centralities produced epidemic curves similar
to those observed at lower vaccination levels, which did not
occur for the other measures. In contrast, eigenvector-based
measures, especially eigenvector-in centrality, were more effective in Hays and Denton counties, which are larger and
more heavily urbanized. In several experiments, eigenvectorin centrality outperformed random vaccination, though they
were much less reliable than in-degree and inverse betweenness. Eigenvector-in centrality’s effectiveness increased in
urbanized counties because eigenvector-based measures favor central blocks that are connected to other central blocks.
Clusters of vulnerable blocks, which eigenvector-in centrality selects, were prevalent in counties such as Hays and Denton than in Rockwall, leading to the increased effectiveness
of that centrality measure. However, as seen in Figure 3,
eigenvector-based measures were still generally ineffective
compared to other options.
In-degree centrality, at 30 percent and 50 percent vaccination, caused the longest delay in the peak of the epidemic.
This result arose because contacts within in-degree central
blocks, which were more likely to occur than those within
non-central ones, did not cause disease spread because those
blocks were vaccinated. This resulted in the disease taking
longer to spread because it was forced into less probable
paths.
In previous experiments with our simulator, we received unusual data, which we do not represent here. Specifically, random vaccination was reported as the most effective method
for both the intervention and prevention scenarios in Denton County. These results were most likely a result of the
stochastic nature of our simulator. It is possible, however,
that this result was caused by in-degree centrality’s preference for the large number of highly-populated blocks in
Denton County, which left large areas of the county unvaccinated.
Some of the limitations of our work are our assumptions
that the population is homogenous within each block, that
contact rates between census blocks are approximated by
Equation 6, and that the individual contact rate is constant.
Another limitation is that we are only testing one isolated
county at a time. These assumptions do not reflect reality, but are common approximations that have been used
in computational models of epidemics such as the Global
Stochastic Cellular Automata model [16].
Future work will primarily focus on addressing the limitations described above. Methods for simulating non-homogenous populations [19, 10] will be incorporated into our model.
Alternative centrality measures and more accurate weighting formulas will be investigated. We will also attempt to
determine what methods would produce results that surpass
random vaccination in cases that are currently outliers.
6.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Ajelli, B. Gonçalves, D. Balcan, V. Colizza, H. Hu,
J. J. Ramasco, S. Merler, and A. Vespignani.
Comparing large-scale computational approaches to
epidemic modeling: agent-based versus structured
metapopulation models. BMC infectious diseases,
10:190, Jan. 2010.
[2] P. Bonacich. Factoring and weighting approaches to
status scores and clique identification. Journal of
Mathematical Sociology, 2:113–120, 1972.
[3] P. Bonacich. Some unique properties of eigenvector
centrality. Social Networks, 29(4):555–564, Oct. 2007.
[4] U. Brandes. A faster algorithm for betweenness
centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology,
25(1994):163–177, 2001.
[5] U. S. C. Bureau. Geographic Terms and Concepts Block. http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/gtc/
gtc_block.html, 2010.
[6] R. M. Christley, G. L. Pinchbeck, R. G. Bowers,
D. Clancy, N. P. French, R. Bennett, J. Turner, and
R. M. Chistley. Infection in social networks: using
network analysis to identify high-risk individuals.
American journal of epidemiology, 162(10):1024–31,
Nov. 2005.
[7] L. Freeman. A set of measures of centrality based on
betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1):35–41, 1977.
[8] S. Fu and G. Milne. Epidemic modelling using cellular
automata. In Proc. of the Australian Conference . . . ,
2003.
[9] A. A. Hagberg, D. A. Schult, and P. J. Swart.
Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function
using NetworkX. In Proceedings of the 7th Python in
Science Conference (SciPy2008), pages 11–15,
Pasadena, CA USA, Aug. 2008.
[10] S. Indrakanti. A Global Stochastic Modeling
Framework to Simulate and Visualize Epidemics.
Masters, University of North Texas, 2012.
[11] T. V. Johnson. The Influece of Social Network Graph
Structure on Disease Dynamics in a Simulated
Environment. Phd, University of North Texas, 2010.
[12] L. Matrajt and I. M. Longini. Optimizing vaccine
allocation at different points in time during an
epidemic. PloS one, 5(11):e13767, Jan. 2010.
[13] J. Medlock and A. P. Galvani. Optimizing influenza
vaccine distribution. Science (New York, N.Y.),
325(5948):1705–8, Sept. 2009.
[14] R. M. Merrill and T. C. Timmreck. Intruduction to
Epidemiology, 4th ed. Jones & Bartlett, 2006.
[15] A. R. Mikler, A. Bravo-Salgado, and C. D. Corley.
Global Stochastic Contact Modeling of Infectious
Diseases. In 2009 International Joint Conference on
Bioinformatics, Systems Biology and Intelligent
Computing, pages 327–330. IEEE, 2009.
[16] A. R. Mikler, S. Venkatachalam, and K. Abbas.
Modeling infectious diseases using global stochastic
cellular automata. Journal of Biological . . . ,
13(4):421–439, 2005.
[17] S. D. Mylius, T. J. Hagenaars, A. K. Lugnér, and
J. Wallinga. Optimal allocation of pandemic influenza
vaccine depends on age, risk and timing. Vaccine,
26(29-30):3742–9, July 2008.
[18] U. Nieminen. On the centrality in a directed graph.
Social Science Research, 2:371–378, 1973.
[19] J. Reyes-Silveyra, A. R. Mikler, J. Zhao, and
A. Bravo-Salgado. Modeling Infectious Outbreaks in
Non-Homogeneous Populations. Journal of Biological
Systems, 19(04):591–606, Dec. 2011.
[20] R. B. Rothenberg, J. J. Potterat, D. E. Woodhouse,
W. W. Darrow, S. Q. Muth, and A. A. Klovdahl.
Choosing a centrality measure: epidemiologic
correlates in the Colorado Springs study of social
networks. Social Networks, 17(3-4):273–297, 1995.
[21] A. H. Rustam. Epidemic Network and Centrality.
Master’s, University of Oslo, 2006.
[22] A. R. Tuite, D. N. Fisman, J. C. Kwong, and A. L.
Greer. Optimal pandemic influenza vaccine allocation
strategies for the Canadian population. PloS one,
5(5):e10520, Jan. 2010.
[23] S. Venkatachalam and A. Mikler. Modeling infectious
diseases using global stochastic field simulation. In
2006 IEEE International Conference on Granular
Computing, pages 750–753. Ieee, 2006.
[24] J. Wallinga, M. van Boven, and M. Lipsitch.
Optimizing infectious disease interventions during an
emerging epidemic. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
107(2):923–8, Jan. 2010.
| 5cs.CE
|
Adaptive Bernstein–von Mises theorems in
Gaussian white noise
arXiv:1407.3397v3 [math.ST] 19 Dec 2016
Kolyan Ray∗
Abstract
We investigate Bernstein–von Mises theorems for adaptive nonparametric Bayesian
procedures in the canonical Gaussian white noise model. We consider both a Hilbert
space and multiscale setting with applications in L2 and L∞ respectively. This provides
a theoretical justification for plug-in procedures, for example the use of certain credible
sets for sufficiently smooth linear functionals. We use this general approach to construct
optimal frequentist confidence sets based on the posterior distribution. We also provide
simulations to numerically illustrate our approach and obtain a visual representation of
the geometries involved.
AMS 2000 subject classifications: Primary 62G20; secondary 62G15, 62G08.
Keywords and phrases: Bayesian inference, posterior asymptotics, adaptation, credible
set, confidence set.
Contents
1 Introduction
2
2 Statistical setting
2.1 Function spaces and the white noise model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Weak Bernstein–von Mises phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Self-similarity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5
5
7
8
3 Bernstein–von Mises results
3.1 Empirical and hierarchical Bayes in `2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Slab and spike prior in L∞ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9
9
11
4 Applications
4.1 Adaptive credible sets in `2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2 Adaptive credible bands in L∞ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13
13
15
5 Posterior independence of the credible sets
16
∗
Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9512, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail:
[email protected]
Most of this work was completed during the author’s PhD at the University of Cambridge. This work was
supported by UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant EP/H023348/1 and
the European Research Council under ERC Grant Agreement 320637.
1
6 Simulation example
19
7 Proofs
7.1 Proofs of weak BvM results in `2 (Theorems 3.1 and 3.2)
7.2 Proof of weak BvM result in L∞ (Theorem 3.5) . . . . . .
7.3 Credible sets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.4 Posterior independence of the credible sets . . . . . . . . .
7.5 Remaining proofs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
23
23
25
27
30
38
8 Technical facts and results
8.1 Results for `2 -setting . . . . . . . . .
8.2 Results for L∞ -setting . . . . . . . .
8.3 Wavelets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8.4 Weak convergence . . . . . . . . . .
8.5 Results on empirical and hierarchical
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
39
39
41
43
44
45
1
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
Bayes procedures
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Introduction
A key aspect of statistical inference is uncertainty quantification and the Bayesian approach
to this problem is to use the posterior distribution to generate a credible set, that is a region
of prescribed posterior probability (often 95%). This can be considered an advantage of the
Bayesian approach since Bayesian credible sets can be computed by simulation. In particular,
the Bayesian generates a number of posterior draws and then keeps a prescribed fraction of
the draws, discarding the remainder which are considered “extreme” in some sense. From a
frequentist perspective, key questions are whether such a method has a theoretical justification and what is an effective rule for determining which draws to discard. A natural approach
is to characterize such draws using a geometric notion, in particular by considering a minimal
ball in some metric.
In finite dimensions, the Euclidean distance has a clear interpretation as the natural
measure of size. However in infinite dimensions such a notion is less clear-cut: the L2 metric
is the natural generalization of the Euclidean norm, but lacks a clear visual interpretation,
while L∞ can be easily visualized but is more difficult to treat mathematically. From the
Bayesian perspective of simulating credible sets, the practitioner ultimately seeks a practical
and effective rule for sorting through posterior draws and such geometric interpretations can
be viewed as somewhat artificial impositions. The aim of this article is therefore to study
possible geometric choices of credible sets that behave well from a frequentist asymptotic
perspective.
(n)
Consider data Y (n) arising from some probability distribution Pf , f ∈ F. We place a
prior distribution Π on F and study the behaviour of the posterior distribution Π(· | Y (n) )
(n)
under the frequentist assumption Y (n) ∼ Pf0 for some non-random true f0 ∈ F as the data
size or quality n → ∞. From such a viewpoint, the theoretical justification for posterior based
inference using any (Borel) credible set in finite dimensions is provided by the Bernstein–von
Mises (BvM) theorem (see [33, 50]). This deep result establishes mild conditions on the prior
under which the posterior is approximately a normal distribution centered at an efficient
estimator of the true parameter. It thus provides a powerful tool to study the asymptotic
2
behaviour of Bayesian procedures and justifies the use of Bayesian simulations for uncertainty
quantification.
A BvM in infinite-dimensions fails to hold in even very simple cases. Freedman [20]
showed that in the basic conjugate `2 sequence space setting with both Gaussian priors
and data, the BvM does not hold for `2 -balls centered at the posterior mean – see also
the related contributions [17, 28, 34]. The resulting message is that despite their intuitive
interpretation, credible sets based on posterior draws using an `2 -based selection procedure
do not behave as in classical parametric models. Recently, Castillo and Nickl [11, 12] have
established fully infinite-dimensional BvMs by considering weaker topologies than the classical
√
Lp spaces. Their focus lies on considering spaces which admit 1/ n-consistent estimators and
where Gaussian limits are possible, unlike Lp -type loss. Credible regions selected using these
different geometries are shown to behave well, generating asymptotically exact frequentist
confidence sets. In this paper, we explore this approach in practice via both theoretical
results for adaptive priors, as well as by numerical simulations. We consider an empirical
Bayes, a hierarchical Bayes and a multiscale Bayes approach.
Before going into more abstract detail, it is useful to consider an example from [12] to
numerically illustrate this approach in practice. Suppose that we observe Y1 , ..., Yn i.i.d.
observations from an unknown density f0 on [0, 1]. We take a simple histogram prior Π,
L
f =2
L −1
2X
hk 1ILk ,
ILk = (k2−L , (k + 1)2−L ],
k ≥ 0,
(1.1)
k=0
L
where the hk are drawn from a D(1, ..., 1)-Dirichlet distribution on the unit simplex in R2 .
Here we ignore adaptation issues and select L = Ln based on the smoothness of the true
function. Letting {ψlk : l ≥ 0, k = 0, ..., 2l − 1} denote the standard Haar wavelets and
wl = l1/2+ for > 0 small, consider the multiscale credible ball
(1.2)
Cn = f : max wl−1 |hf − fˆn , ψlk i| ≤ Rn n−1/2 ,
k,l≤Ln
where fˆn denotes the posterior mean and Rn = R(Y1 , ..., Yn ) is chosen such that Π(Cn |
Y1 , ..., Yn ) = 0.95. By Proposition 1 of [12], Pf0 (f0 ∈ Cn ) → 0.95 as n → ∞, whereas no such
result is available for the L∞ -credible ball. Due to the conjugacy of the Dirichlet distribution
with multinomial sampling, the posterior distribution can be computed straightforwardly and
Rn can be easily obtained by simulation.
For convenience we take f0 to be a Laplace distribution with location parameter 1/2
and scale parameter 5 that is truncated to [0, 1], that is f0 (x) ∝ e−5|x−1/2| 1[0,1] (x) with
f0 ∈ H2s ([0, 1)) for s < 3/2. In Figure 1, we plotted the true density (solid black) and the
posterior mean (red) in the cases n = 1000, 2000, 5000, 10000. We generated 100,000 posterior
draws and plotted the 95% closest to the posterior mean in the M(w) sense (grey) to simulate
Cn . We also used the posterior draws to generate a 95% credible band in L∞ by estimating
Qn satisfying Π(f : ||f − fˆn ||∞ ≤ Qn | Y ) = 0.95 and then plotting fˆn ± Qn (dashed black).
We see that the L∞ diameter of Cn is strictly greater than that of the L∞ -credible band,
with this difference particularly marked at the peak of the density. However, the diameter
of Cn is spatially heterogeneous and has greatest width at the peak, whilst having smaller
width around points where the true density is more regular. In all cases, Cn contains the
true f0 , whereas the L∞ confidence band has more difficulty capturing the peak.
3
Figure 1: Credible sets based on the Dirichlet prior with the true density function (solid black),
the posterior mean (red), a 95% credible band in L∞ (dashed black) and the set Cn given in
(1.2) (grey). We have n = 1000, 2000, 5000 and 10000 respectively.
The main message of this numerical example is that simulating the credible set Cn , which
uses a slightly different geometry, yields a set that does not look particularly strange in
practice and in fact resembles an L∞ credible band. Both approaches are methodologically
similar, the only difference being the rule for discarding posterior draws. From a theoretical
point of view, the difference between the two sets is far more significant, with Cn yielding
exact coverage statements at the expense of unbounded L∞ diameter. It is however possible to
improve upon the naive implementation of such sets to also obtain the optimal L∞ diameter
(see Proposition 1 of [12] and related results below). Modifying the geometry in such a
way to obtain an exact coverage statement therefore comes at little additional cost from a
practitioner’s perspective.
Nonparametric priors typically contain tuning or hyper parameters, and it is a key challenge to study procedures that select these parameters automatically in a data-driven manner.
This avoids the need to make unreasonably strong prior assumptions about the unknown parameter of interest, since incorrect calibration of the prior can lead to suboptimal performance
(see e.g. [30]). It therefore makes sense to use an automatic procedure, unless a practitioner
is particularly confident that their prior correctly captures the fine details of the unknown parameter, such as its level of smoothness or regularity. Adaptive procedures are widely used in
practice, with hyper parameters commonly selected using a hyperprior or an empirical Bayes
method. In the case of Gaussian white noise, a number of Bayesian procedures have been
shown to be rate adaptive over common smoothness classes (see for example [27, 29, 42]).
Most such frequentist analyses restrict attention to obtaining contraction rates and do not
4
study coverage properties of credible sets. The focus of this paper is therefore to investigate
nonparametric BvMs for adaptive priors, with the goal of studying the coverage properties
of credible sets.
In the case of Gaussian white noise, there has been recent work [30, 34] circumventing the
need for a BvM by explicitly studying the coverage properties of certain specific credible sets.
Of particular relevance is a nice recent paper by Szabó et al. [48], where the authors use an
empirical Bayes approach combined with scaling up the radius of `2 -balls to obtain adaptive
confidence sets under a so-called polished tail condition. Their approach relies on explicit prior
computations and provides an alternative to the more abstract point of view taken here. One
of our principal goals is exact coverage statements and this seems more difficult to obtain
using such an explicit approach. Since adaptive confidence sets do not exist in full generality,
we also require self-similarity conditions on the true parameter to exclude certain “difficult”
functions [24],[26],[6]. In particular, we shall consider the procedure of [48] in Section 3.1 and
obtain exact coverage statements under the self-similarity condition introduced there.
We note other work dealing with BvM results in the nonparametric setting. Leahu [34]
has studied the impact of prior smoothness on the existence of BvM theorems in the conjugate
Gaussian sequence space model. Bickel and Kleijn [3], Castillo [8], Rivoirard and Rousseau
[45] and Castillo and Rousseau [13] provide sufficient conditions for BvMs for semiparametric functionals. For the case of finite-dimensional posteriors with increasing dimension, see
Ghosal [22] and Bontemps [4] for the case of regression or Boucheron and Gassiat [5] for
discrete probability distributions.
Much of the approach taken here can equally be applied to other statistical settings such
as sparsity and inverse problems [43], but we restrict to the nonparametric regime for ease
of exposition. Since our focus lies on BvM results and coverage statements and this changes
little conceptually, we omit such generalizations to maintain mathematical clarity.
2
2.1
Statistical setting
Function spaces and the white noise model
We use the usual notation Lp = Lp ([0, 1]) for p-times Lebesgue integrable functions and
denote by `p the usual sequence spaces. We consider the canonical white noise model, which
is equivalent to the fixed design Gaussian regression model with known variance. For f ∈
L2 = L2 ([0, 1]), consider observing the trajectory
(n)
dYt
1
= f (t)dt + √ dBt ,
n
t ∈ [0, 1],
(2.1)
where dB is a standard white noise. By considering the action of an orthonormal basis
{eλ }λ∈Λ on (2.1), it is statistically equivalent to consider the Gaussian sequence space model
(n)
Yλ
1
≡ Yλ = fλ + √ Zλ ,
n
λ ∈ Λ,
(2.2)
where the (Zλ )λ∈Λ are i.i.d. standard normal random variables and the unknown parameter
of interest f = (fλ )λ∈Λ is assumed to be in `2 . We denote by Pf0 or P0 the law of Y arising
from (2.2) under the true function f0 . In the following, Λ will represent either a Fourier-type
basis or a wavelet basis. In the `2 -setting, (2.2) can be interpreted purely in sequence form
with Λ = N and we do not need to associate to it a time index t ∈ [0, 1].
5
In L∞ we consider a multiscale approach so that Λ = {(j, k) : j ≥ 0, k = 0, ..., 2j − 1}. In
particular, we consider an S-regular (S ≥ 0) wavelet basis of L2 ([0, 1]), {ψlk : l ≥ J0 − 1, k =
0, ..., 2l − 1}, with J0 ∈ N. For notational simplicity, denote the scaling function φ by the first
wavelet ψ(J0 −1)0 . We consider either periodized wavelets or boundary corrected wavelets (see
e.g. [38] for more details). Moreover, in certain applications we require in addition that the
wavelets satisfy a localization property
sup
J0 −1
2X
J0 /2
|φJ0 k (x)| ≤ c(φ)2
< ∞,
sup
x∈[0,1] k=0
j −1
2X
|ψjk (x)| ≤ c(ψ)2j/2 < ∞,
(2.3)
x∈[0,1] k=0
j ≥ J0 (see Section 8.3 for more discussion). The sequence model (2.2) corresponds to
estimating the wavelet coefficients flk = hf, ψlk i, for all (l, k) ∈ Λ, since any function f ∈ L2
generates such a wavelet sequence. Conversely, any such sequence
P(flk ) generates the wavelet
series of a function (or distribution if the sequence is not in `2 ) (l,k) flk ψlk .
For s, δ ≥ 0, define the Sobolev spaces at the logarithmic level:
(
)
∞
X
s,δ
2
k 2s (log k)−2δ |fk |2 < ∞ .
H s,δ ≡ H2 := f ∈ `2 : ||f ||s,2,δ :=
k=1
From this we recover the usual definition of the Sobolev spaces H s ≡ H2s = H2s,0 and by
duality we define for s > 0, H2−s := (H2s )∗ . By standard Hilbert space duality arguments, we
can consider `2 as a subspace of H2−s and can similarly define the logarithmic spaces for s < 0
and δ ≥ 0 using the above series definition. In the `2 -setting we shall classify smoothness via
the Sobolev hyper rectangles for β ≥ 0:
)
(
Q(β, R) =
f ∈ `2 : sup k 2β+1 fk2 ≤ R .
k≥1
In the L∞ ([0, 1])-setting we consider multiscale spaces: for a monotone increasing sequence
w = (wl )l≥1 with wl ≥ 1, define
(
)
1
M = M(w) = x = (xlk ) : ||x||M(w) := sup
max |xlk | < ∞
l≥0 wl k
(for further references to multiscale statistics see [12]). A separable closed subspace is obtained by considering the restriction
1
M0 = M0 (w) = x ∈ M(w) : lim
max |xlk | = 0 ,
l→∞ wl k
that is those (weighted) sequences in M(w) that converge to 0. Note that M contains the
space `2 , since ||x||M ≤ ||x||`2 as wl ≥ 1. In this setting, we consider norm-balls in the Besov
β
spaces B∞∞
([0, 1]),
H(β, R) = {f = (flk )(l,k)∈Λ : |flk | ≤ R2−l(β+1/2) , ∀(l, k) ∈ Λ}.
β
We recall that B∞∞
([0, 1]) = C β ([0, 1]), the classical Hölder (-Zygmund in the case β ∈ N)
spaces. For more details on these embeddings and identifications see [38].
6
Whether an `2 -white noise defines a tight random element of M0 (w) depends
√ on the
weighting sequence (wl ). Recall that we call a sequence (wl )l≥1 admissible if wl / l % ∞ as
l → ∞ [12]. Let Z = {Zλ = hZ, eλ i : λ ∈ Λ}, where Zλ ∼ N (0, 1) i.i.d., denote the Gaussian
white noise in (2.2). We have from [11, 12] that for δ > 1/2 and (wl ) an admissible sequence,
−1/2,δ
Z defines a tight Gaussian Borel random variable on H2
and M0 (w) respectively, which
we denote Z. In view of this tightness, we can consider (2.1) as a Gaussian shift model:
1
Y(n) = f + √ Z,
n
√
−1/2,δ
where the above inequality is in the H2
- or M0 (w)-sense. Since n(Y(n) − f ) = Z in
−1/2,δ
H2
or M0 (w), it immediately follows that Y(n) is an efficient estimator of f in either
norm.
Among the two classes {H2s,δ }s∈R,δ≥0 and {M0 (w)}w of spaces considered, one can show
that s = −1/2, δ > 1/2 and admissibility of w determine the minimal spaces where the law of
the `2 -white noise Z is tight (see [11, 12] for further discussion). We therefore focus attention
on these spaces since they provide the threshold for which a weak convergence approach can
−1/2,δ
work. For convenience, we denote H ≡ H(δ) ≡ H2
. We further denote the law of Z in
H or M0 (w) by N as appropriate.
2.2
Weak Bernstein–von Mises phenomena
Due to the continuous embeddings `2 ⊂ H and `2 ⊂ M0 (w), any Borel probability measure
on `2 yields a tight Borel probability measure on H and M0 (w). Consider a prior Π on `2
and let Πn = Π(· | Y (n) ) denote the posterior distribution based on data (2.2). For S a vector
space and z ∈ S, consider the map τz : S → S given by
√
τz : f 7→ n(f − z).
Let Πn ◦τY−1
(n) denote the image measure of the posterior distribution (considered as a measure
on H or M0 (w)) under the map τY(n) . Thus for any Borel set B arising from these topologies,
√
Πn ◦ τY−1
n(f − Y(n) ) ∈ B | Y (n) ),
(n) (B) = Π(
√
so that we can more intuitively write Πn ◦ τY−1
n(f − Y(n) ) | Y (n) ), where L(f | Y (n) )
(n) = L(
denotes the law of f under the posterior. For convenience, we metrize the weak convergence
of probability measures via the bounded Lipschitz metric (defined in Section 8.4). Recalling
that we denote by N the law of the white noise Z in (2.2) as an element of S, we define the
notion of nonparametric BvM.
Definition 1. Consider data generated from (2.2) under a fixed function f0 and denote by
P0 the distribution of Y (n) . Let βS be the bounded Lipschitz metric for weak convergence
of probability measures on S. We say that a prior Π satisfies a weak Bernstein-von Mises
phenomenon in S if, as n → ∞,
√
E0 βS (Πn ◦ τY−1
n(f − Y(n) ) | Y (n) ), N ) → 0.
(n) , N ) = E0 βS (L(
Here S is taken to be one of H(δ) for δ > 1/2, H −s for s > 1/2 or M0 (w) for (wl )l≥1 an
admissible sequence.
7
The weak BvM says that the (scaled and centered) posterior distribution asymptotically
looks like an infinite-dimensional Gaussian distribution in some ‘weak’ sense, quantified via
the bounded Lipschitz metric (8.9). Weak convergence in S implies that these two probability measures are approximately equal on certain classes of sets, whose boundaries behave
smoothly with respect to the measure N (see Sections 1.1 and 4.1 of [11]).
2.3
Self-similarity
The study of adaptive BvM results naturally leads to the topic of adaptive frequentist confidence sets. It is known that confidence sets with radius of optimal order over a class of
submodels nested by regularity that also possess honest coverage do not exist in full generality (see [26, 40] for recent references). We therefore require additional assumptions on the
parameters to be estimated and so consider self-similar functions, whose regularity is similar
at both small and large scales. Such conditions have been considered in Giné and Nickl [24],
Hoffmann and Nickl [26] and Bull [6] and ensure that we remove those functions whose norms
(measuring smoothness) are difficult to estimate and which statistically look smoother than
they actually are. We firstly consider the `2 -type self-similarly assumption found in Szabó et
al. [48].
Definition 2. Fix an integer N0 ≥ 2 and parameters ρ > 1, ε ∈ (0, 1). We say that a
function f ∈ Q(β, R) is self-similar if
dρN e
X
fk2 ≥ εRN −2β
for all
N ≥ N0 .
k=N
We denote the class of self-similar elements of Q(β, R) by QSS (β, R, ε).
This condition says that each block (fN , ..., fdρN e ) of consecutive components contains
at least a fixed fraction (in the `2 -sense) of the size of a “typical” element of Q(β, R), so
that the signal looks similar at all frequency levels (see [48, 39, 40] for further discussion).
The parameters N0 and ρ affect the results of this article through the sample size at which
the asymptotic results take effect, that is n → ∞ implicitly implies statements of the form
“for n ≥ n0 large enough”, where n0 depends on N0 and ρ. For this reason, the impact
of N0 and ρ is not explicitly mentioned below and one may simply treat these constants as
fixed (e.g. N0 = 2 and ρ = 2). The lower bound in Definition 2 can be slightly weakened to
permit for example logarithmic deviations from N −2β . However since this results in additional
technicality whilst adding little extra insight, we do not pursue such a generalization here. It
is possible to consider a weaker self-similarity condition using a strictly frequentist approach
[40], though this has not been explored in the Bayesian
setting and it is unclear whether our
P
approach extends in such a way. Let Kj (f ) = k hf, φjk iφjk denote the wavelet projection
at resolution level j. In L∞ we consider Condition 3 of Giné and Nickl [24], which can only
be slightly relaxed [6].
Definition 3. Fix a positive integer j0 . We say that a function f ∈ H(β, R) is self-similar
if there exists a constant ε > 0 such that
||Kj (f ) − f ||∞ ≥ ε2−jβ
for all
j ≥ j0 .
We denote the class of self-similar elements of H(β, R) by HSS (β, R, ε).
8
In particular, since f ∈ H(β, R), we have that ||Kj (f ) − f ||∞ 2−jβ for all j ≥
j0 . What we really require is that there is at least one significant coefficient at the level
log2 ((n/ log n)1/(2β+1) ) that the posterior distribution can detect. However, this level depends also on unknown constants in practice (see proof of Proposition 4.5) and so we require
a statement for all (sufficiently large) resolution levels as in Definition 3. See Giné and Nickl
[24] and also Bull [6] for further discussion about this condition.
3
3.1
Bernstein–von Mises results
Empirical and hierarchical Bayes in `2
We continue the frequentist analysis of the adaptive priors studied in [29, 48, 47] in `2 . For
α > 0 define the product prior on the `2 -coordinates by the product measure
Πα =
∞
O
N (0, k −2α−1 ),
k=1
so that the coordinates are independent. A draw from this distribution will be Πα -almost
0
surely in all Sobolev spaces H2α for α0 < α. The posterior distribution corresponding to Πα
is given by
∞
O
n
1
Πα (· | Y ) =
N
Yk , 2α+1
.
(3.1)
k 2α+1 + n
k
+n
k=1
Hβ
If f0 ∈
and α = β, it has been shown [2, 7, 30] that the posterior contracts at the
minimax rate of convergence, while if α 6= β, then strictly suboptimal rates are achieved. Since
the true smoothness β is generally unknown, two data-driven procedures have been considered
in [29]. The empirical Bayes procedure consists of selecting the smoothness parameter by
using a likelihood-based approach. Namely, we consider the estimate
α̂n = argmax `n (α),
(3.2)
α∈[0,an ]
where an → ∞ is any sequence such that an = o(log n) as n → ∞ and
∞
n
1X
n2
2
log 1 + 2α+1 − 2α+1
`n (α) = −
Y
2
k
k
+n k
k=1
is the marginal log-likelihood for α in the joint model (f, Y ) in the Bayesian setting (relative
to the infinite product measure ⊗∞
k=1 N (0, 1)). The quantity an is needed to uniformly control
the finite dimensional projections of the empirical Bayes procedure to establish a parametric
BvM (Theorem 7.2). The posterior distribution is defined via the plug-in procedure
Πα̂n (· | Y ) = Πα (· | Y ) |α=α̂n .
If there exist multiple maxima to (3.2), then any of them can be selected.
A fully Bayesian approach is to put a hyperprior on the parameter α. This yields the
hierarchical prior distribution
Z
∞
ΠH =
λ(α)Πα dα,
0
where λ is a positive Lebesgue density on (0, ∞) satisfying the following assumption (Assumption 2.4 of [29]).
9
Condition 1. Assume that for every c1 > 0, there exists c2 ≥ 0, c3 ∈ R, with c3 > 1 if c2 = 0
and c4 > 0 such that for α ≥ c1 ,
−c3
c−1
exp (−c2 α) ≤ λ(α) ≤ c4 α−c3 exp (−c2 α) .
4 α
The exponential, gamma and inverse gamma distributions satisfy Condition 1 for example. Knapik et al. [29] showed that both these procedures contract to the true parameter
adaptively at the (almost) minimax rate, uniformly over Sobolev balls, and a similar result holds for Sobolev hyper rectangles. Both procedures satisfy weak BvMs in the sense of
Definition 1.
Theorem 3.1. Consider the empirical Bayes procedure described above. For every β, R > 0
and s > 1/2, we have
sup E0 βH −s (Πα̂n ◦ τY−1 , N ) → 0
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
as n → ∞. Moreover, for δ > 2 we have the (slightly) stronger convergence
sup
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
E0 βH(δ) (Πα̂n ◦ τY−1 , N ) → 0
as n → ∞.
Theorem 3.2. Consider the hierarchical Bayes procedure described above, where the prior
density λ satisfies Condition 1. For every β, R > 0 and s > 1/2, we have
sup
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
−1
E0 βH −s (ΠH
n ◦ τY , N ) → 0
as n → ∞. Moreover, for δ > 2 we have the (slightly) stronger convergence
sup
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
−1
E0 βH(δ) (ΠH
n ◦ τY , N ) → 0
as n → ∞.
The requirement of self-similarity for a weak BvM in H(δ) could conceivably be relaxed,
but such an assumption is natural since it is anyway needed for the construction of adaptive
confidence sets in Section 4.1. It is not clear whether this is a fundamental limit or a technical
artefact of the proof. The condition δ > 2 is also required for technical reasons.
Whilst minimax optimality is clearly desirable from a theoretical frequentist perspective,
it may be too stringent a goal in our context. Using a purely Bayesian point of view, we
derive an analogous result to Doob’s almost sure consistency result. Specifically, a weak BvM
holds in H(δ) for prior draws, almost surely under both the empirical Bayes and hierarchical
priors. For this, it is sufficient to show that prior draws are self-similar almost surely.
Proposition 3.3. The parameter f0 is self-similar in the sense of Definition 2, Πα -almostsurely for any α > 0. Consequently, Πα̂n and ΠH satisfy a weak BvM in H(δ) for δ > 2,
Πα -a.s., α > 0, and ΠH -a.s. respectively.
In particular, f satisfies Definition 2 with smoothness α and parameters ρ > 1 and
ε = ε(α, ρ, R) > 0 sufficiently small and random N0 sufficiently large, Πα -almost surely. As a
simple corollary to Theorems 3.1 and 3.2, we have that the rescaled posteriors merge weakly
10
(with respect to weak convergence on H(δ)) in the sense of Diaconis and Freedman [19].
By Proposition 2.1 of [41], we immediately have that the unscaled posteriors merge weakly
with respect to the `2 -topology since they are both consistent [29]. However, in the case of
bounded Lipschitz functions (rather than the full case of continuous and bounded functions),
we can improve this result to obtain a rate of convergence.
Corollary 3.4. For every β, R > 0, s > 1/2 and δ > 2, we have
sup
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
−1
−1
E0 βH −s (ΠH
n ◦ τY , Πα̂n ◦ τY ) → 0
sup
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
−1
−1
E0 βH(δ) (ΠH
n ◦ τY , Πα̂n ◦ τY ) → 0
as n → ∞. In particular, for S = H −s or H(δ) as above,
Z
L
H
.
sup
u d(Πn − Πα̂n ) = oP0 √
n
u:||u||BL ≤L S
3.2
Slab and spike prior in L∞
Consider the slab and spike prior, whose frequentist contraction rate has been analyzed
in Castillo and van der Vaart [15], Hoffmann et al. [27] and Castillo et al. [14]. The
assumptions in [27] ensure that prior draws are very sparse and only very few coefficients are
fitted. We therefore modify the prior slightly so that the prior automatically fits the first few
coefficients of the signal without any thresholding. This ensures that the posterior will have
a rough approximation of the signal before fitting wavelet coefficients more sparsely at higher
resolution levels. This makes sense from a practical point of view by preventing overly sparse
models and is in fact necessary from a theoretical perspective (see Proposition 3.7).
Let Jn = blog n/ log 2c be such that n/2 < 2Jn ≤ n and define some strictly increasing
sequence j0 = j0 (n) → ∞ such that j0 (n) < Jn . For the low resolutions j ≤ j0 (n) we fit a
simple product prior where we draw the fjk ’s independent from a bounded density g that is
strictly positive on R. For the middle resolution levels j0 (n) < j ≤ Jn , the fjk ’s are drawn
independently from the mixture
Πj (dx) = (1 − wj,n )δ0 (dx) + wj,n g(x)dx,
n−K ≤ wj,n ≤ 2−j(1+θ) ,
for some K > 0 and θ > 1/2. All coefficients at levels j > Jn are set to 0. Since this is a
product prior, one can sample from the posterior by sampling from each component separately
(using either an MCMC scheme or explicit expressions depending on the choice of density g).
We have a weak BvM in the multiscale space M0 (w), where the rate at which the admissible
sequence (wl ) diverges depends on the how many coefficients we automatically
√ fit in the prior
via the sequence j0 (n). Recall that a sequence (wl )l≥1 is admissible if wl / l % ∞.
Theorem 3.5. Consider the slab and spike prior defined above with lower threshold given by
the strictly increasing sequence j0 (n) → ∞. The posterior distribution satisfies a weak BvM
in M0 (w) in the sense of Definition 1, that is for every β, R > 0,
sup
f0 ∈H(β,R)
E0 βM0 (w) (Πn ◦ τY−1 , N ) → 0
√
as n → ∞, for any admissible sequence (wl ) satisfying wj0 (n) / log n % ∞.
11
√
Note that in the limiting case wl = l, we recover j0 (n) ' log n, so that the prior
automatically fits the same fixed fraction of the full 2Jn ' n coefficients. Since we consider
only admissible sequences, the fraction of coefficients that the prior fits automatically is
asymptotically vanishing. An alternative way to consider this result √
is in reverse: based on
a desired rate in practice, we prescribe an admissible sequence wl = lul , where ul is some
divergent sequence, and then pick j0 (n) appropriately. Taking j0 (n) to grow more slowly than
any power of log n means (wl ) must grow faster than any power of l, resulting in a greater
than logarithmic down-weighting of the wavelet coefficients in M(w). It may therefore be
more appropriate to take j0 (n) a power of log n, which yields the following specific case.
Corollary 3.6. Consider the slab and spike prior defined above with lower threshold j0 (n) '
1
(log n) 2+1 for some > 0. Then it satisfies a weak BvM in M0 (w) in the sense of Definition
1, that is for every β, R > 0,
sup
f0 ∈H(β,R)
E0 βM0 (w) (Πn ◦ τY−1 , N ) → 0
as n → ∞ for the admissible sequence wl = l1/2+ ul , where ul is any (arbitrarily slowly)
diverging sequence.
While the requirement to fit the first few coefficients of the prior is mild and of practical
use in nonparametrics, it is naturally of interest to study the behaviour of the posterior
distribution with full thresholding, that is when j0 (n) ≡ 0, which we denote by Π0 . In general
√
however, the full posterior contracts to the truth at a rate strictly slower than 1/ n in M(w),
√
so that a n-rescaling of the posterior cannot converge weakly to a limit. This holds even
for self-similar functions.
Proposition 3.7. Let (wl ) be any admissible sequence. Then for any β, R > 0, there exists
ε = ε(β, R, ψ) > 0 and f0 ∈ HSS (β, R, ε) such that along some subsequence (nm ),
E0 Π0 (||f − Y||M(w) ≥ Mnm nm −1/2 | Y (nm ) ) → 1
for all Mn → ∞ sufficiently slowly. Consequently, for such an f0 , a weak BvM in M0 (w) in
the sense of Definition 1 cannot hold.
It is particularly relevant that Proposition 3.7 applies to self-similar parameters since a
major application of the weak BvM is the construction of adaptive credible regions with
√
good frequentist properties under self-similarity (see Proposition 4.5). On the level of a nrescaling as in Definition 1, the rescaled posterior distribution asymptotically puts vanishingly
small probability mass on any given M(w)-ball infinitely often. p
This occurs because the
posterior selects non-zero coordinates by thresholding at the level log n/n rather than
√ the
√
required 1/ n (Lemma 1 of [27]). The weighting sequence (wl ) regularizes the extra log n
factor at high frequencies, but does not do so at low frequencies. This√is the reason that the
weighting sequence (wl ) depends explicitly on the thresholding factor log n in Theorem 3.5.
It seems that using such an adaptive scheme on low frequencies of the signal causes the
weak BvM to fail. This prior closely resembles the frequentist practice of wavelet thresholding,
where such a phenomenon has also been observed. For example, Giné and Nickl [23] require
similar (though stronger) assumptions on the number of coefficients that need to be fitted
automatically to obtain a central limit theorem for the distribution function of the hard
thesholding wavelet estimator in density estimation (Theorem 8 of [23]).
12
4
4.1
Applications
Adaptive credible sets in `2
We propose credible sets from the hierarchical or empirical Bayes procedures, which we show
are adaptive frequentist confidence sets for self-similar parameters. We consider the natural
Bayesian approach of using the quantiles of the posterior distribution to obtain a credible set
of prescribed posterior probability. By considering sets whose geometry is amenable to the
space H(δ), the weak BvM P
implies that such credible sets are asymptotically confidence sets.
−1
−2δ f 2 . For a given significance level 0 < γ < 1,
Recall that ||f ||2H(δ) = ∞
k=1 k (log k)
k
consider the credible set
√
Cn = f : ||f − Y||H(δ) ≤ Rn / n ,
(4.1)
where Rn = Rn (Y, γ) is chosen such that Πα̂n (Cn |Y ) = 1 − γ or ΠH (Cn |Y ) = 1 − γ. Since
the empirical and hierarchical Bayes procedures both satisfy a weak BvM in H(δ), we have
from Theorem 1 of [11] that in both cases
Pf0 (f0 ∈ Cn ) → 1 − γ
and
Rn = OP0 (1)
as n → ∞, so that Cn is asymptotically an exact frequentist confidence set (of unbounded
`2 -diameter). We control the diameter of the set using either the estimator α̂n or the posterior median as a smoothness estimate, and then use the standard frequentist approach of
undersmoothing. In the first case, consider
n
o
p
√
C̃n = f : ||f − Y||H(δ) ≤ Rn / n, ||f − fˆn ||H α̂n −n ≤ C log n ,
(4.2)
where fˆn is the posterior mean, Rn is chosen as in Cn , n (chosen possibly data dependently)
satisfies r1 /(log n) ≤ n ≤ (r2 / log n) ∧ (α̂n /2) for some 0 < r1 ≤ r2 ≤ ∞ and C > 1/r1 .
0
The undersmoothing by n is necessary since the posterior assigns probability 1 to H α for
α0 < α̂n , while probability 0 to H α̂n itself. Geometrically, C̃n is the intersection of two
`2 -ellipsoids, Cn and an H α̂n −n -norm ball. For a typical element f in C̃n , the size of the
low frequency coordinates of f are determined by Cn , while the smoothness condition in C̃n
acts to regularize the elements of Cn (which are typically not in `2 ) by shrinking the higher
frequencies.
Proposition 4.1. Let 0 < β1 ≤ β2 < ∞, R ≥ 1 and ε > 0. Then the confidence set C̃n
given in (4.2) satisfies
sup
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
β∈[β1 ,β2 ]
Pf0 (f0 ∈ C̃n ) − (1 − γ) → 0
as n → ∞. For every β ∈ [β1 , β2 ], uniformly over f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε),
0 1/(4β+2)
Πα̂n (C̃n | Y ) = 1 − γ + OP0 n−C n
for some C 0 > 0 independent of β, R, ε, N0 , ρ, while the `2 -diameter satisfies for δ > 2,
|C̃n |2 = OP0 n−β/(2β+1) (log n)(2δβ+1/2)/(2β+1) .
13
The logarithmic correction in the definition of H(δ) that is required for a weak BvM
causes the (log n)2δβ/(2β+1) penalty (which is O((log n)2δ ) uniformly over β ≥ 0); this is the
price required for using a plug-in approach in H(δ). The remaining (log n)1/(4β+2) factor
arises due to the second constraint in C̃n , where the H α̂n -radius must be taken sufficiently
large to ensure C̃n has sufficient posterior probability.
While the second constraint in (4.2) reduces the credibility below 1 − γ, Proposition 4.1
shows that this credibility loss is very small. The Bayesian approach takes care of this automatically since the posterior concentrates on a much more regular set than `2 . This is
corroborated empirically by numerical evidence (see Figure 3), which shows that the credibility of the set C̃n rapidly approaches 1 − γ as n increases.
Remark 4.2. A naive interpretation of Cn yields a credible set that is far too large, having
unbounded `2 -diameter, with the additional constraint in C̃n needed to regularize the set. In
actual fact the posterior does this regularization automatically with Cn being “almost optimal”.
Proposition 4.1 could be rewritten for Cn with exact credibility Πα̂n (Cn | Y ) = 1 − γ and `2 diameter satisfying
2δβ+1/2
0 1/(4β+2)
− β
Πα̂n (f ∈ Cn : ||f − fˆn ||2 ≤ Cn 2β+1 (log n) 2β+1 | Y ) = 1 − γ + OP0 n−C n
,
for some C, C 0 > 0. In view of this, the sets Cn and C̃n are essentially the same from the point
of view of the posterior, with Cn having exact credibility for finite n and correct `2 -diameter
asymptotically and C̃n having the reverse. In particular, the finite time credibility “gap” for
either having too large radius in Cn or smaller than 1 − γ credibility for C̃n is of the same
size. Moreover, the above statement holds without the need for a self-similarity assumption,
which is possible since the confidence set does not strictly have optimal diameter. The same
notion also holds for Cn arising from the hierarchical Bayes procedure.
Remark 4.3. By Lemma 8.2 the empirical Bayes posterior mean fˆn satisfies ||fˆn − Y||H(δ) =
√
oP0 (1/ n) and so is an efficient estimator of f0 in H(δ). Consequently one can substitute Y
with fˆn in the definitions of Cn and C̃n .
Replacing the estimate α̂n with the median αnM of the marginal posterior distribution
λn (·|Y ) yields a fully Bayesian analogue. To obtain the necessary undersmoothing over
a target range [β1 , β2 ], we consider the shifted estimator β̂n = αnM − (C + 1)/ log n, where
C = C(R, β2 , ε, ρ) = maxβ1 ≤β≤β2 C(R, β, ε, ρ) is the constant appearing in Lemma 8.7 (which
can be explicitly computed). Consider
n
o
p
√
C̃n0 = f : ||f − Y||H ≤ Rn / n, ||f − fˆn ||H β̂n ≤ Mn log n ,
(4.3)
where fˆn is the posterior mean, Mn → ∞ grows more slowly than any polynomial and Rn
is chosen as in Cn . Taking Cn arising from the hierarchical Bayesian procedure ΠH , C̃n0 is a
“fully Bayesian” object. We have an analogue of Proposition 4.1.
Proposition 4.4. Let 0 < β1 ≤ β2 < ∞, R ≥ 1 and ε > 0. Then the confidence set C̃n0
given in (4.3) satisfies
sup
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
β∈[β1 ,β2 ]
Pf0 (f0 ∈ C̃n0 ) − (1 − γ) → 0
14
as n → ∞. For every β ∈ [β1 , β2 ], uniformly over f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε),
ΠH (C̃n0 | Y ) = 1 − γ + oP0 (1) ,
while the `2 -diameter satisfies for δ > 2,
|C̃n0 |2 = OP0 n−β/(2β+1) (log n)(2δβ+1/2)/(2β+1) .
4.2
Adaptive credible bands in L∞
We provide a fully Bayesian construction of adaptive credible bands using the slab and spike
prior. The posterior median f˜ = (f˜n,lk )(l,k)∈Λ (defined coordinate-wise) takes the form of a
thresholding estimator (c.f. [1]), which we use to identify significant coefficients. This has
the advantage of both simplicity and interpretability and also provides a natural Bayesian
approach for this coefficient selection. Such an approach was used by Kueh [31] to construct an
asymptotically honest (i.e. uniform in the parameter space) adaptive frequentist confidence
set on the sphere using needlets. In that article, the coefficients are selected based on the
empirical wavelet coefficients with the thresholds selected conservatively using Bernstein’s
inequality. In contrast, we use a Bayesian approach to automatically select the thresholding
quantile constants that then yields exact coverage statements.
Let
√
Dn = {f : ||f − Y||M(w) ≤ Rn / n},
(4.4)
where Rn = Rn (Y, γ) is chosen such that Π(Dn | Y ) = 1 − γ. We then define the data driven
width of our confidence band
r
Jn
2l −1
X
log n X
vn
σn,γ = σn,γ (Y ) = sup
1{f˜lk 6=0} |ψlk (x)|,
(4.5)
n
x∈[0,1]
l=0
k=0
where (vn ) is any (possibly data-driven) sequence such that vn → ∞. Under a local selfsimilarity type condition as in Kueh [31], one could possibly remove the supremum in (4.5)
to obtain a spatially adaptive procedure. However, we restrict attention to more global
self-similarity conditions here for simplicity. Since we consider wavelets satisfying (2.3), we
have
r
r
l −1
Jn 2X
Jn
X
p
log n
log n X
σn,γ ≤ vn
sup
|ψlk (x)| ≤ C(ψ)vn
2l/2 ≤ C 0 vn log n < ∞ a.s.,
n x∈[0,1]
n
l=0 k=0
l=0
for all n and γ ∈ (0, 1). Let πmed denote the projection onto the non-zero coordinates of the
posterior median and in a slight abuse of notation set
l
πmed (Y )(x) =
Jn 2X
−1
X
Ylk 1{f˜lk 6=0} ψlk (x),
l=0 k=0
where we recall Ylk =
R1
ψlk (t)dY (t). Consider the set
√
Dn = {f : ||f − Y||M(w) ≤ Rn / n, ||f − πmed (Y )||∞ ≤ σn,γ (Y )},
0
(4.6)
where Rn is as in (4.4). This involves a two-stage procedure: we firstly calculate the required M(w)-radius Rn and then use the posterior median to select the coefficients deemed
significant.
15
Proposition 4.5. Let 0 < β1 ≤ β2 < ∞, R ≥ 1 and ε > 0. Consider the slab and spike prior
defined√
above with threshold j0 (n) → ∞ and let (wl ) be any admissible sequence that satisfies
wj0 (n) / log n % ∞. Then the confidence set Dn given in (4.6), using the choice (wl ) and
σn,γ (Y ) defined in (4.5) for vn → ∞, satisfies
sup
f0 ∈HSS (β,R,ε)
β∈[β1 ,β2 ]
Pf0 (f0 ∈ Dn ) − (1 − γ) → 0
as n → ∞. For every β ∈ [β1 , β2 ], uniformly over f0 ∈ HSS (β, R, ε),
Π(Dn | Y ) = 1 − γ + oP0 (1),
while the L∞ -diameter satisfies
|Dn |∞ = OP0 (n/ log n)−β/(2β+1) vn .
Under self-similarity, Dn has radius equal to the minimax rate in L∞ up to some factor vn
that can be taken to diverge arbitrarily slowly, again mirroring a frequentist undersmoothing
penalty. The choice of the posterior median is for simplicity and can be replaced by any other
suitable thresholding procedure, for example directly using the posterior mixing probabilities
between the atom at zero and the continuous density component.
One could also consider other alternatives to σn,γ that simultaneously control the L∞ norm of the credible set whilst also preserving coverage and credibility. A similar construction
β̂n
-ball,
to the credible sets in Section 4.1 could also be pursued by intersecting Dn with a B∞1
where β̂n is a suitable estimate of the smoothness. Alternatively, in view of Remark 4.2, one
can also show that
! !
wjn (β) −β/(2β+1)
Π f ∈ Dn : ||f − Tn ||∞ ≤ p
n
(log n)(β+1)/(2β+1) Y = 1 − γ + oP0 (1) ,
jn (β)
where Tn is an efficient estimator of f0 in M that is alsoprate-optimal in L∞ (e.g. (8.5)
or (8.6)) and 2jn ∼ (n log n)1/(2β+1) . The factor wjn (β) / jn (β) can be made to diverge
arbitrarily slowly by the prior choice of j0 (n).
5
Posterior independence of the credible sets
−1/2,δ
As shown above, the spaces H(δ) = H2
and M(w) yield credible sets with good frequentist properties. However, given the different geometries proposed, it is of interest to compare
them to more classical credible sets. Consider the `2 -ball studied in [20, 48] (though without
the blow-up factor of the latter)
Cn`2 = {f : ||f − fˆn ||2 ≤ Q̃n (α̂n , γ)},
(5.1)
where Q̃n (α̂n , γ) is selected such that Πα̂n (Cn`2 | Y ) = 1 − γ. Since the posterior variance of
Πα (· | Y ) is independent of the data, the radius Q̃n (α̂n , γ) depends only on the data through
α̂n . By Theorem 1 of [20] we have Q̃n (α, γ) = Qn n−α/(2α+1) , where Qn → Q > 0.
Numerical examples of C̃n and Cn`2 are displayed in Section 6. Given the similarity of C̃n
and Cn`2 in Figures 2 and 4, a natural question (voiced for example in [10, 39, 49]) is to what
16
extent these sets actually differ, both in theory and practice. From a purely geometric point of
view these sets can be considered as infinite-dimensional ellipsoids with differing orientations.
From a Bayesian perspective, an intriguing question is to what degree the decision rules on
which these credible sets are based differ with respect to the posterior. For simplicity, we
centre C̃n at the posterior mean fˆn , which we can do by Remark 4.3.
Theorem 5.1. Suppose an in (3.2) satisfies in addition an ≤ log n/(6 log n log n). Then the
(1 − γ)-H(δ)-credible ball C̃n defined in (4.2) and the (1 − γ)-`2 -credible ball Cn`2 defined in
(5.1) are asymptotically independent under the empirical Bayes posterior, that is as n → ∞,
Πα̂n (C̃n ∩ Cn`2 | Y ) = Πα̂n (C̃n | Y )Πα̂n (Cn`2 | Y ) + oP0 (1) = (1 − γ)2 + oP0 (1)
uniformly over f0 ∈ Q(β, R).
The first equality above also holds with C̃n replaced by Cn or Cn`2 replaced by the blown-up
`2 -credible ball studied in [48]. Moreover, the above statement also holds for the hierarchical
Bayes posterior with C̃n replaced by the (1 − γ)-H(δ)-credible ball C̃n0 given in (4.3) and Cn`2
replaced by the corresponding hierarchical Bayes `2 -credible set.
Theorem 5.1 says that the Bayesian decision rules leading to the construction of C̃n and
Cn`2 are fundamentally unrelated - one contains asymptotically no information about the
other. Although we can conclude that C̃n and (blown-up) Cn`2 are frequentist confidence sets
with similar properties, they express completely different aspects of the posterior. Note that
this is not simply an artefact of the prior choice since the equivalent prior credible sets are
not independent under the prior despite its product structure. An alternative interpretation
is to consider Bayesian tests based on the credible regions, which have optimal frequentist
properties. In this context, the two tests screen different and unrelated features. While both
of these approaches are valid, both for the frequentist and the Bayesian, Theorem 5.1 says
that neither of these constructions can be reduced to the other.
The H(δ)-credible sets are principally determined by the low frequencies (k ≤ kn , where
kn → ∞ in the proof), whereas the `2 -credible sets are driven by the high frequencies (k >
kn ). The product structure of the posterior asymptotically decouples these two regimes
yielding the independence statement. In particular the H(δ)-norm down-weights the higher
order frequencies enough that one is dealing with a close to finite-dimensional model. Such
a result is unlikely to hold for arbitrary priors, unless there is some degree of posterior
independence between the frequency ranges driving the different credible sets (though less
independence than a full product posterior is necessary). The numerical simulations in Figure
3 corroborate Theorem 5.1 very closely, indicating that this result provides a good finite
sample approximation to the posterior behaviour.
The posterior draws plotted in Section 6 are approximately drawn from the posterior
distribution conditioned to the respective credible sets. Corollary 5.2 quantifies how close
these draws are in terms of the total variation distance || · ||T V .
`2
Cn
n
Corollary 5.2. Let ΠC̃
α̂n (· | Y ), Πα̂n (· | Y ) denote the posterior distribution conditioned to
the sets C̃n , Cn`2 respectively. Then as n → ∞,
`2
Cn
n
||ΠC̃
α̂n (· | Y ) − Πα̂n (· | Y )||T V = γ + oP0 (1).
Proof. Each conditional distribution consists of the posterior distribution restricted to the
relevant credible set and normalized by the same factor (1 − γ). The two distributions are
17
therefore identical on their intersection and so the total variation distance equals
!
1 Πα̂n (C̃n ∩ (Cn`2 )c | Y ) Πα̂n (C̃nc ∩ Cn`2 | Y )
1 2γ(1 − γ) + oP0 (1)
= γ + oP0 (1).
+
=
2
2
1−γ
Πα̂n (C̃n | Y )
Πα̂n (Cn`2 | Y )
Turning to the L∞ -setting, P
for mathematical convenience let us consider the slightly
stronger Besov norm kf kB∞1
= l 2l/2 maxk |hf, ψlk i| as in Hoffmann et al. [27]. This norm
0
0
0
is closely related to the k · k∞ -norm via the Besov space embbedings B∞1
⊂ L∞ ⊂ B∞∞
(Chapter 4.3 of [25]). Define
∞
DnL
= {f : ||f − Tn ||B∞1
≤ Qn (γ)},
0
(5.2)
(2)
where Tn = Tn is given by (8.6) and is an efficient estimator of f0 in M that is also rate∞
optimal in L∞ and Qn (γ) is selected such that Π(DnL | Y ) = 1 − γ. The choice of Tn is
not essential, but it is convenient to select an estimator that can simultaneously act as the
∞
centering for both Dn and DnL . We take the density g in Π to be Gaussian to simplify
certain computations. Analogous results to those in H(δ) then hold.
Theorem 5.3. Consider the slab and spike prior Π with lower threshold j0 (n) → ∞ and let
2
g be the density of
√ the Gaussian distribution N (0, τ ). Let (wl ) be any admissible sequence
satisfying wj0 (n) / log n % ∞ as n → ∞. Then the (1 − γ)-M(w)-credible ball Dn defined in
∞
(4.6) and the (1 − γ)-L∞ -credible ball DnL defined in (5.2) are asymptotically independent
under the posterior, that is as n → ∞,
∞
Π(Dn ∩ DnL
∞
| Y ) = Π(Dn | Y )Π(DnL
| Y ) + oP0 (1) = (1 − γ)2 + oP0 (1)
uniformly over f0 ∈ H(β, R).
In particular the choice
of j0 (n) in Corollary 3.6 satisfies the conditions of Theorem 5.3
√
since then wj0 (n) ' un log n, where un can be made to diverge arbitrarily slowly.
L∞
Corollary 5.4. Consider the same conditions as in Theorem 5.3 and let ΠDn (· | Y ), ΠDn (· |
∞
Y ) denote the posterior distribution conditioned to the sets Dn , DnL respectively. Then as
n → ∞,
L∞
||ΠDn (· | Y ) − ΠDn (· | Y )||T V = γ + oP0 (1).
Heuristics for an extension to density estimation
The proofs of Theorems 5.1 and 5.3 presented here rely on the independence of the coordinates
in the Gaussian white noise model. This model can be viewed as an idealized version of
other more concrete statistical models, being mathematically more tractable. In view of the
extension of the nonparametric BvM to density estimation in [12], let us briefly discuss a
heuristic of what we might expect in this setting.
Suppose we observe Y1 , ..., Yn i.i.d. observations from an unknown density f0 on [0, 1].
Assume that f0 is uniformly bounded away from 0 and that f0 ∈ C β ([0, 1]), where 1/2 < β ≤
1. Consider the simple histogram prior Π specified in (1.1), where we again ignore adaptation
issues and select L = Ln → ∞ based on the smoothness of f0 . Such a prior has been shown
18
to contract optimally in L∞ by Castillo [9] and to satisfy a weak BvM in M0 by Castillo and
Nickl [12].
Let (ψlk ) denote the Haar wavelet basis on [0, 1] and M the related multiscale space for a
suitable admissible sequence (wl ). Further let πA denote the projection onto the elements of
the Haar wavelet basis with resolution level contained in A. One can show that for suitable
sequences jn,1 , jn,2 → ∞ satisfying 2jn,1 2jn,2 ,
√
Π(f : ||f − Tn ||M ≤ Rn / n, ||f − Tn ||∞ ≤ Q̄n | Y )
√
= Π(f : kπ≤jn,1 (f − Tn )kM ≤ (Rn + o(1))/ n, kπ≥jn,2 (f − Tn )k∞ ≤ Q̄n + δn |Y ) + oP0 (1),
√
where Tn is a suitable centering, Rn / n and Q̄n are the (1 − γ)-quantiles of the respective
credible sets and δn is selected small enough to only change the credibility of the latter set
by oP0 (1).
Using the conjugacy of the Dirichlet distribution with multinomial sampling, the posterior
distribution for (hk ) is D(N1 + 1, ..., NL + 1), where Nk = |{Yi : Yi ∈ ILk }|. Observe
that the law of flk = hf, ψlk i under the posterior depends principally on the observations
falling within supp(ψlk ) = [k2−l , (k + 1)2−l ]. Unlike the Gaussian white noise model, there
is dependence across the posterior wavelet coefficients due to the dependence within the
Dirichlet distribution and the constraint that the number of observations sums to n.
The k · kM -norm in the above display is the weighted maximum of {flk : l ≤ jn,1 }. If jn,1
does not grow too fast, this consists of relatively few “large sample” averages. Heuristically,
this term behaves like a central order statistic, being driven by the average sample behaviour.
On the contrary, the k·k∞ -term is determined by the largest coefficients at each resolution level
l ≥ jn,2 . Since 2jn,1 2jn,2 , these can be seen to behave more like extreme order statistics,
being the maximum of many almost independent “small samples” (at least relative to the
frequencies l ≤ jn,1 ). Even though order statistics depend, by definition, on all observations,
central and extreme order statistics asymptotically depend on the observations in orthogonal
ways and become stochastically independent (c.f. Chapter 21 of [50]). One might therefore
hope that the two norms in the previous display are asymptotically independent in the sense
of Theorems 5.1 and 5.3.
An alternative way to understand why the wavelet coefficients at a given resolution level
may be considered “almost independent” under the posterior is via Poissonization. It is wellknown that density estimation is asymptotically equivalent to Poisson intensity estimation
[37, 44], where one observes a Poisson process with intensity measure nf0 . Equivalently, the
Poisson experiment corresponds to observing a Poisson random variable N with expectation n
and then independently of N observing Y1 , ..., YN i.i.d. with density f0 . In this framework, the
dependence induced by the number of observations summing to n is removed, meaning that
the variables (N1 , ..., NL ) defined above are fully independent. The remaining dependence
is due to the Dirichlet distribution and becomes negligible as the number of bins Ln → ∞.
Since this equivalence is asymptotic in nature, one should expect such a heuristic to manifest
itself also asymptotically.
6
Simulation example
We now apply our approach in a numerical example. Following on from the example of the
−1/2,δ
M(w)-based credible set (1.2), we now consider the space H2
. Consider the Fourier sine
19
basis
ek (x) =
√
2 sin(kπx),
k = 1, 2, ...,
and define the true function f0,k = hf0 , ek i2 = k −3/2 sin(k) so that the true smoothness is
β = 1. We consider realisations of the data (2.2) at levels n = 500 and 2000 and use the
empirical Bayes posterior distribution. We plotted the true f0 (black), the posterior mean
(red) and an approximation to the credible sets (grey). To simulate the `2 credible balls
Cn`2 given in (5.1), we sampled 2000 curves from the posterior distribution and kept the 95%
closest in the `2 sense to the posterior mean and plotted them (grey). We performed the
same approach to obtain the full H(δ)-credible set Cn given in (4.1) and then plotted the full
adaptive confidence set C̃n given in (4.2) with C = 1 and n = 1/ log n. We also present the
approximate credibility of C̃n by considering the fraction of the simulated
√ curves from the
ˆ
posterior that satisfy the extra constraint of C̃n that ||f − fn ||H α̂n −n ≤ log n. This is given
in Figure 2.
While the true `2 and H(δ) credible balls are unbounded in L∞ , the posterior draws can
be shown to be bounded in L∞ explaining the boundedness of the plots. Sampling from
the posterior (and thereby implicitly intersecting the sets Cn`2 and C̃n with the posterior
support) seems the natural approach for the Bayesian. Indeed those elements that constitute
the “roughest” or least regular elements of the credible sets are not seen by the posterior, that
is they have little or no posterior mass (see Lemma 8.3). The posterior contains significantly
more information than merely the `2 or H(δ) norm of the parameter of interest, as can be
seen by it assigning mass 1 to a strict subset of `2 . For further discussion on plotting such
credible sets see [10, 36, 49].
For a given set of 2000 posterior draws, we also computed the credibility of C̃n at a chosen
significance level and the credibility of the posterior draws falling in both C̃n and Cn`2 . This
latter quantity has value (1 − γ)2 + oP0 (1) by Theorem 5.1. We repeated this 20 times and
the average values are presented in Figure 3.
The posterior distribution appears to have some difficulty visually capturing the resulting
function at its peak. In fact the credible sets do “cover the true function”, but do so in
an `2 rather than an L∞ -sense. Indeed, any `2 -type confidence ball will be unresponsive to
highly localized pointwise features since they occur on a set of small Lebesgue measure (as
in this case). Similar reasoning also explains the performance of the posterior mean at this
point. The posterior mean estimates the Fourier coefficients of f0 and hence estimates the
true function in an `2 -sense via its Fourier series.
In Section 5 it was shown that the two approaches behave very differently theoretically
and the numerical results in Figure 3 match this theory very closely. It appears that the two
methods do indeed use different rejection criteria in practice resulting in different selection
outcomes. The visual similarity between the `2 and H(δ)-credible balls in Figure 2 is therefore
a result of the posterior draws themselves looking similar, rather than the methods performing
identically.
We note that already by n = 500, C̃n has the correct credibility so that the high frequency
smoothness constraint is satisfied with posterior probability virtually equal to 1 (c.f. Proposition 4.1). C̃n is therefore an actual credible set for reasonable (finite) sample sizes rather
than a purely asymptotic credible set. The posterior distribution already strongly regularizes
the high frequencies so that the posterior draws are very regular with high probability. This
can be quantitatively seen by the rapidly decaying variance term of the posterior distribution
(3.1). This is indeed the case in the simulation, where the credibility gap is negligible, thereby
20
Figure 2: Empirical Bayes credible sets for the Fourier sine basis with the true curve (black)
and the empirical Bayes posterior mean (red). The left panels contain the `2 credible ball Cn`2
given in (5.1) and the right panels contain the set C̃n given in (4.2). From top to bottom,
n = 500, 2000 and α̂n = 1.29, 1.01, with the right-hand side each having credibility 95%.
demonstrating that most of the posterior draws already satisfy the smoothness constraint in
C̃n .
We repeat the same simulation using the same true function f0,k = k −3/2 sin(k), but with
basis equal to the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the Volterra operator (c.f. [30]):
√
ek (x) = 2 cos((k − 1/2)πx),
k = 1, 2, ...
and plot this in Figure 4 for n = 1000.and plot this in Figure 4 for n = 1000. Unlike Figure
2, the resulting function has no “spike” and so both credible sets have no trouble visually
capturing the true function (though one should remember that these are `2 rather than L∞
type credible sets).
We now illustrate
√ the multiscale approach using the slab and spike prior with lower
threshold j0 (n) = log n, plotting the true function (solid black) and posterior mean (red) at
levels n = 200, 500. We have used Haar wavelets, set g to be N (0, 1/2) and have taken prior
weights wj,n = min(n−1 , 2−5.5j ), corresponding to K = 1 and θ = 5. For n = 200 and 500,
we have fitted one scaling function plus 28 − 1 = 255 and 29 − 1 = 511 wavelet coefficients
respectively (i.e. 2Jn +1 − 1). We again sampled 2000 curves from the posterior distribution
and plotted the 95% closest to the posterior mean in the M(w) sense (grey) to simulate Dn in
(4.4). We also used the posterior draws to generate a 95% credible band in L∞ by estimating
∞
Q̄n (0.05) and then plotting DnL in (5.2) (dashed black). Finally we computed local 95%
credible intervals at every point x ∈ [0, 1] and joined these to form a credible band (dashed
blue). This is given in Figure 5.
21
Chosen significance
Credibility of C̃n
Credibility of C̃n ∩ Cn`2
Expected credibility of C̃n ∩ Cn`2
0.95
0.9500
0.9020
0.9025
Chosen significance
Credibility of C̃n
Credibility of C̃n ∩ Cn`2
Expected credibility of C̃n ∩ Cn`2
0.95
0.9500
0.9025
0.9025
n=500
0.90
0.85
0.8999 0.8499
0.8102 0.7220
0.8100 0.7225
n=2000
0.90
0.85
0.9000 0.8500
0.8095 0.7226
0.8100 0.7225
0.80
0.8000
0.6406
0.6400
0.80
0.8000
0.6409
0.6400
Figure 3: Table showing the average credibility of C̃n , the average credibility of the posterior
draws falling in both sets and the expected value of the latter (from Theorem 5.1).
Figure 4: Empirical Bayes credible sets for the Volterra SVD basis with the true curve (black)
and the empirical Bayes posterior mean (red) for n = 1000 and α̂n = 1.07. The left and right
panels contain the `2 credible ball Cn`2 given in (5.1) and C̃n (credibility 95%) given in (4.2)
respectively.
We see from Figure 5 that each posterior draw consists of a rough approximation of the
signal via frequencies j ≤ j0 (n) with a few “spikes” from the high frequencies; the rather
unusual shape is a reflection of the prior choice. It is worth noting that the posterior draws
are bounded in L∞ since the posterior contracts rate optimally to the truth in L∞ [27]. We
see that the L∞ diameter of Dn is strictly greater than that of the L∞ -credible bands, though
this only manifests itself in a few places. The size of the L∞ -bands is driven by the size of the
spikes, which are few in a number but occur in every posterior draw, resulting in seemingly
very wide credible bands.
On the contrary, the local credible intervals ignore the spikes since less than 5% of the
draws have a spike at any given point, resulting in much tighter bands. The dashed blue lines
in effect correspond to the 95% L∞ -band from a prior fitting exclusively the low frequencies
j ≤ j0 (n), which is a non-adaptive prior modelling analytic smoothness. This dramatically
oversmoothes the truth resulting in far too narrow credible bands and is highly dangerous
since it is known that oversmoothing the truth can yield zero coverage [30, 34].
22
Figure 5: Slab and spike credible sets with the true curve (black), posterior mean (red), a
95% credible band in L∞ (dashed black), pointwise 95% credible intervals (dashed blue) and
the set Dn given in (4.4) (grey). We have n = 200, 500 respectively.
7
Proofs
In what follows denote by πj the projection onto either Vj = span{ek : 1 ≤ k ≤ j} or
Vj = span{ψlk : 0 ≤ l ≤ j, k = 0, ..., 2l −1} depending on whether we are considering a Fouriertype basis or a wavelet basis. Similarly define π>j to be the projection onto span{ek : k > j}
or Vj = span{ψlk : l > j, k = 0, ..., 2l − 1}.
7.1
Proofs of weak BvM results in `2 (Theorems 3.1 and 3.2)
√
To prove a weak BvM we need to show that the posterior contracts at rate 1/ n to the truth
in the relevant space and that the finite-dimensional projections of the rescaled posterior
converge weakly to those of the normal law N (see Theorem 8 of [11] for more discussion).
The latter condition is implied by a classical parametric BvM in total variation. Recall that
α̂n is the maximum marginal likelihood estimator defined in (3.2).
Theorem 7.1. For every β, R > 0 and Mn → ∞, we have
sup
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
E0 Πα̂n (f : ||f − f0 ||S ≥ Mn Ln n−1/2 |Y ) → 0,
where S = H(δ) or H −s for s > 1/2. If S = H(δ) then Ln = (log n)3/2 (log log n)1/2 ; if in
addition f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε), then the rate improves to Ln = 1 for δ ≥ 2. If S = H −s for
s > 1/2, then Ln = 1.
Proof. This contraction result is proved in the same manner as Theorem 2 in [29], with
suitable modifications for the different norms used. In the case S = H(δ), self-similarity is
needed to obtain a sharp upper bound on the behaviour of α̂n , which is required to bound
the posterior bias.
Theorem 7.2. The finite dimensional projections of the empirical Bayes procedure satisfy a
parametric BvM, that is for every finite dimensional subspace V ⊂ `2 ,
sup
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
E0 ||Πα̂n (·|Y ) ◦ TY−1 − NV (0, I)||T V → 0,
where πV denotes the projection onto V and Tz : f 7→
23
√
nπV (f − z).
Proof. Without loss of generality, let V = span{ek : 1 ≤ k ≤ J}. Using Pinsker’s inequality
and that α̂n ∈ [0, an ] by the choice (3.2),
||Πα̂n (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 − N (0, IJ )||2T V ≤ sup ||Πα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 − N (0, IJ )||2T V
α∈[0,an ]
≤ sup KL(Πα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 , N (0, IJ )),
α∈[0,an ]
where KL denotes the Kullback-Leibler divergence. Using the exact formula for the KullbackLeibler divergence between two Gaussian measures on RJ ,
KL(Πα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 , N (0, IJ ))
" J
#
J
J
X
X
k 4α+2 Yk2
1 X
n
n
−J
=
+n
+
log
2
k 2α+1 + n
(k 2α+1 + n)2
k 2α+1 + n
≤
.
1
2n
k=1
J
X
k=1
2α+2
J
n
k=1
k 2α+1 + k 4α+2 Yk2
+
k=1
J 4α+3
max Y 2 .
n 1≤k≤J k
Since E0 max1≤k≤J Yk2 = O(1) for fixed J and α ≤ an = o(log n) by the choice of an , the
result follows.
Proof of Theorem 3.1. Fix η > 0, let S denote H −s or H(δ) as appropriate and set Π̃α̂n =
Πα̂n ◦ τY−1 . By the triangle inequality,
βS (Π̃α̂n , N ) ≤ βS (Π̃α̂n , Π̃α̂n ◦ πj−1 ) + βS (Π̃α̂n ◦ πj−1 , N ◦ πj−1 ) + βS (N ◦ πj−1 , N ),
for some j > 0. Using the contraction result of Theorem 7.1 and following the argument of
Theorem 8 of [11], we deduce that the E0 -expectation of the first term is smaller that η/3 for
sufficiently large j, uniformly over the relevant function class (in the case of H(δ) the result
holds for all δ > 2 - we recall from the proof of that theorem that if the required contraction
is established in H(δ 0 ), then the required tightness argument holds in H(δ) for any δ > δ 0 ).
A similar result holds for the third term. For the middle term, note that the total variation
distance dominates the bounded Lipschitz metric. For fixed j, we thus have that for n large
enough,
E0 βS (Π̃α̂n ◦ πj−1 , N ◦ πj−1 ) ≤ E0 ||Πα̂n (·|Y ) ◦ TY−1 − NV (0, I)||T V ≤ η/3,
using Theorem 7.2 with V = Vj .
A similar situation holds true for the hierarchical Bayesian prior.
Theorem 7.3. Suppose that the prior density λ satisfies Condition 1. Then for every β, R >
0 and Mn → ∞, we have
sup E0 ΠH f : ||f − f0 ||S ≥ Mn Ln n−1/2 |Y → 0,
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
where S = H(δ) or H −s for s > 1/2. If S = H(δ) then Ln = (log n)3/2 (log log n)1/2 ; if in
addition f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε), then the rate improves to Ln = 1 for δ ≥ 2. If S = H −s for
s > 1/2, then Ln = 1.
24
Proof. This result is proved in the same manner as Theorem 3 in [29], with suitable modifications arising as in the proof of Theorem 7.1.
Theorem 7.4. The finite dimensional projections of the hierarchical Bayesian procedure
satisfy a parametric BvM, that is for every finite dimensional subspace V ⊂ `2 ,
sup
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
E0 ||ΠH (·|Y ) ◦ TY−1 − NV (0, I)||T V → 0,
where πV denotes the projection onto V and Tz : f 7→
√
nπV (f − z).
Proof. Again let V = span{ek : 1 ≤ k ≤ J}. Using Fubini’s theorem and that the total
variation distance is bounded by 1,
||ΠH (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 − N (0, IJ )||T V
Z ∞
Z
1
λ(α | Y )dΠα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 (x)dα − dN (0, IJ )(x)
=
2 RJ 0
Z
Z
1 ∞
≤
λ(α | Y )
dΠα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 (x)dα − dN (0, IJ )(x) dα
2 0
RJ
Z ∞
=
λ(α | Y )||Πα (· | Y ) ◦ TY−1 − N (0, IJ )||T V dα
0
Z αn
−1
λ(α | Y )dα
≤ sup ||Πα (· | Y ) ◦ TY − N (0, IJ )||T V
0<≤α≤αn
0
Z ∞
+
λ(α | Y )dα,
αn
where αn is defined in Section 8.5. The first term is oP0 (1) by the same argument as in
the proof of Theorem 7.2 and the second term is oP0 (1) by the proof of Theorem 3 of [29].
Since the total variation distance is bounded, convergence in P0 -probability is equivalent to
convergence in L1 (P0 ).
Proof of Theorem 3.2. The proof is exactly the same as that of Theorem 3.1, using Theorems
7.3 and 7.4 instead of Theorems 7.1 and 7.2.
7.2
Proof of weak BvM result in L∞ (Theorem 3.5)
Following Theorem 3.1 of [27], define the sets
o
n
p
Jn (γ) = (j, k) ∈ Λ : |f0,jk | > γ log n/n
for γ > 0. In what follows, we denote by S the support of the prior draw, that is the set
of non-zero coefficients of f = (fjk )(j,k)∈Λ drawn from the prior. We require the following
contraction result.
Theorem 7.5. Consider the slab and spike prior defined in Section 3.2 with lower threshold
given by the strictly increasing sequence j0 (n) → ∞. Then for every 0 < βmin ≤ βmax , R > 0
and Mn → ∞, we have
sup
f0 ∈H(β,R)
E0 Π(f : ||f − f0 ||M(w) ≥ Mn n−1/2 | Y ) → 0
uniformly
over β ∈ [βmin , βmax ], where (wl ) is any admissible sequence satisfying wj0 (n) ≥
√
c log n for some c > 0.
25
Proof of Theorem 7.5. Fix η > 0. Consider the event
An = {S c ∩ Jn (γ) = ∅} ∩ {S ∩ Jnc (γ) = ∅} ∩ {
max
(j,k)∈Jn (γ)
|f0,jk − fjk | ≤ γ
p
(log n)/n}. (7.1)
By Theorem 3.1 of [27], there exist constants 0 < γ < γ < ∞ (independent of β and R) such
that
sup
E0 Π(Acn | Y ) . n−B ,
(7.2)
f0 ∈∪β∈[βmin ,βmax ] H(β,R)
for some B = B(βmin , βmax , R) > 0 (this follows since the probabilities of the complements
of each of the events constituting An satisfy the above bound individually). We then have
the following decomposition for some D = D(η) > 0 large enough to be specified later,
E0 Π ||f − f0 ||M ≥ Mn n−1/2 | Y
≤ E0 Π {||f − f0 ||M ≥ Mn n−1/2 } ∩ {||πj0 (f − f0 )||M ≤ Dn−1/2 } ∩ An | Y
(7.3)
−1/2
−1/2
+ E0 Π {||f − f0 ||M ≥ Mn n
} ∩ {||πj0 (f − f0 )||M > Dn
} ∩ An | Y
+ E0 Π(Acn | Y ).
Note that the first term on the right-hand side of (7.3) is bounded by
E0 Π({||π>j0 (f − f0 )||M ≥ (Mn − D)n−1/2 } ∩ An | Y ).
Combining this with (7.2), we can upper bound the right hand side of (7.3) by
E0 Π({||π>j0 (f − f0 )||M ≥ M̃n n−1/2 } ∩ An | Y )
+ E0 Π(||πj0 (f − f0 )||M > Dn−1/2 | Y ) + o(1),
(7.4)
where M̃n = Mn −D → ∞ as n → ∞. We bound the two remaining terms in (7.4) separately.
For the first term in (7.4), we can proceed as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 of [27]. By the
definition of the Hölder ball H(β, R), there exists Jn (β) such that 2Jn (β) ≤ k(n/ log n)1/(2β+1)
for some constant k > 0 such that Jn (γ) ⊂ {(j, k) : j ≤ Jn (β), k = 0, ..., 2j − 1} and
sup
sup wl−1 max |f0,lk | ≤
f0 ∈H(β,R) l>Jn (β)
k
R2−Jn (β)(β+1/2)
1
p
≤ C(β, R) √ .
n
Jn (β)
Consider now the frequencies j0 < l ≤ Jn (β). On the event An , we have that
r
log n
γ 1
1
1
max |flk − f0,lk | ≤
γ
≤ √ ,
sup
wj 0
n
c n
j0 <l≤Jn (β) wl k
√
since wj0 (n) ≥ c log n by hypothesis. We thus have that on the event An , ||π>j0 (f − f0 )||M =
O(n−1/2 ) for any f0 ∈ H(β, R), which proves that the first term in (7.4) is 0 for n sufficiently
large.
Consider now the second term in (7.4). We shall use the approach of [9] using the moment
generating function to control the low frequency terms.
coordinates we
Qj0 Recall that on these
Π
have the simple product prior Π(dx1 , ..., dxj0 ) = k=1 g(xi )dxi . Let E (· | Y ) denote the
26
expectation with respect to the posterior measure. Following Lemma 1 of [9], we have the
subgaussian bound
√
2
E0 EΠ (et n(flk −Ylk ) | Y ) ≤ Cet /2
for some some C > 0. Using this and proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 4 of [12] yields
!
√
√
nE0 EΠ ||πj0 (f − Y )||M | Y = E0 EΠ sup l−1/2 max n|flk − Ylk | | Y ≤ C,
j≤j0
k
for some C > 0. By Markov’s inequality and then the triangle inequality, the second term in
(7.4) is then bounded by
√
√
C
n
n
E0 EΠ ||πj0 (f − f0 )||M | Y ≤
E0 EΠ ||πj0 (Y − f0 )||M | Y +
D
D
D
(7.5)
C
E0 ||Z||M
+ .
≤
D
D
By Proposition 2 of [12] and the fact that (wl ) is an admissible sequence, the first term in
(7.5) is also bounded by C 0 /D for some C 0 > 0. Taking D = D(η) > 0 sufficiently large, (7.5)
can be then made smaller than η/2.
Proof of Theorem 3.5. Fix η > 0 and denote Π̃n = Πn ◦ τY−1 . By the triangle inequality,
uniformly over the relevant class of functions,
βM0 (Π̃n , N ) ≤ βM0 (Π̃n , Π̃n ◦ πj−1 ) + βM0 (Π̃n ◦ πj−1 , N ◦ πj−1 ) + βM0 (N ◦ πj−1 , N ),
√
for fixed j > 0. Since we have a 1/ n-contraction rate in M for the posterior from Theorem
7.5, we can make the E0 -expectation of the first term smaller than η/3 by taking j sufficiently
large, again using the arguments of Theorem 8 of [11]. We recall from the proof of that
theorem that if the required contraction is established in M(w) for an admissible sequence
(wl ), then the required tightness argument holds in M0 (w) for any admissible (wl ) such that
wl /wl % ∞. A similar result holds for the third term.
For the middle term, note that j0 (n) ≥ j for n large enough. For such n, the projected
prior onto the first j coordinates is a simple product prior which satisfies the usual conditions
of the parametric BvM, namely it has a density that is positive and continuous at the true
(projected) parameter (see Chapter 10 of [50] for more details). Since the total variation
distance dominates the bounded Lipschitz metric, this completes the proof.
7.3
Credible sets
`2 confidence sets
Proof of Proposition 4.1. By Lemma 8.1 and the definition of C̃n , we have
√
sup
|P0 (f0 ∈ C̃n ) − P0 (||f0 − Y||H ≤ Rn / n)| → 0
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
β∈[β1 ,β2 ]
as n → ∞, so that it is sufficient to show that the second probability in the above display
tends to 1 − γ, uniformly over the relevant self-similar Sobolev balls. This follows directly by
Theorem 1 of [11] (an examination of that proof shows that the convergence holds uniformly
27
over the parameter space as long as the weak BvM itself holds uniformly, as is the case here),
thereby establishing the required coverage statement.
Since n ≥ r1 / log n and C > 1/r1 in the definition (4.2) of C̃n , applying Lemma 8.3 (with
η = 1) yields the inequality
p
1
Πα̂n ||f − fˆn ||H α̂n −n ≥ C log n Y . exp −C 0 (log n)n 4α̂n +2 ,
where C 0 > 0 does not depend on α̂n . Since by Lemma 8.6 we have α̂n ≤ β for large
enough n with P0 -probability tending to 1, the right-hand side is bounded by a multiple of
exp(−C 00 (log n)n1/(4β+2) ) with the same probability. The completes the credibility statement.
Let f1 , f2 ∈ C̃n and set g = f1 − f2 . Picking Jn ∼ [n/(log n)2δ−1 ]1/(1+2α̂n −2n ) yields
||g||22
=
∞
X
2
|gk | =
k=1
Jn
X
kk
−1
2δ−2δ
(log k)
|gk | +
k=1
2δ
2
||g||2H(δ)
∞
X
k 2(α̂n −n )−2(α̂n −n ) |gk |2
k=Jn +1
−2(α̂n −n )
Jn
||g||2H α̂n −n
≤ Jn (log Jn )
+
= OP0 Jn (log Jn )2δ n−1 + Jn−2(α̂n −n ) (log n)
4δ(α̂n −n )+1
2(α̂ −n )
− 1+2α̂n −2
n
n (log n) 1+2α̂n −2n
,
= OP0 n
where the constants do not depend on g. Since |α̂n − β| = OP0 (1/ log n) by Lemma 8.6
and n = O(1/ log n) by assumption, some straightforward computations yield that ||g||22 =
OP0 (n−2β/(2β+1) (log n)(4δβ+1)/(2β+1) ) as n → ∞.
Proof of Proposition 4.4. The proof follows in the same way as that of Proposition 4.1, using
Lemma 8.7 and an analogue of Lemma 8.1. The only difference is for the credibility statement,
where we no longer have an exponential inequality like Lemma 8.3. However, arguing as in
[29] with the H β̂n -norm instead of the `2 -norm, one can show
that under self-similarity the
√
posterior contracts about the posterior mean at rate M̃n log n for any M̃n → ∞ (see also
Theorem 1.1 of [49]). It then follows that the second constraint in (4.3) is satisfied with
credibility 1 − oP0 (1).
L∞ confidence bands
Proof of Proposition 4.5. By Lemma 8.4, it suffices to prove all the results on the event Bn
defined in (8.1). We firstly establish the diameter of the confidence set. Recall that πmed
denotes the projection onto the non-zero coordinates of the posterior median and for a set of
coordinates E, let πE denote the projection onto span(E). Taking f1 , f2 ∈ Dn and setting
2Jn (β) ' (n/ log n)1/(2β+1) , we have on Bn ,
||f1 − f2 ||∞ ≤ ||f1 − πmed (Y )||∞ + ||f2 − πmed (Y )||∞
r
Jn (β) 2l −1
X X
log n
≤ 2 sup
vn
|ψlk (x)|
n
x∈[0,1] l=0 k=0
r
r
Jn (β)
log n X l/2
2Jn (β) log n
0
≤ C(ψ)vn
2 ≤ C vn
= OP0
n
n
l=0
28
log n
n
β
2β+1
!
vn
.
We now establish asymptotic coverage. Split f0 = πJn (γ) (f0 ) + πJnc (γ) (f0 ). Since πJnc (γ) ◦
πmed (Y ) = 0 on Bn , we can write
||f0 − πmed (Y )||∞ ≤ ||πmed (f0 − Y )||∞ + ||(id − πmed ) ◦ πJn (γ) (f0 )||∞ + ||πJnc (γ) (f0 )||∞ , (7.6)
where id denotes the identity operator. For the third term in (7.6), note that since f0 ∈
H(β, R),
||πJnc (γ) (f0 )||∞ ≤
∞
X
2l/2
l=0
max
k:(l,k)∈Jnc (γ)
Jn (β)
≤
X
r
2
l/2
l=0
γ
|hf0 , ψlk i|
(7.7)
β
X
log n 2β+1
log n
−lβ
2
≤ C(β, R)
+
.
n
n
l>Jn (β)
For the second term in (7.6), we note that any indices remaining satisfy (l, k) ∈ Jnc (γ 0 ) and
so by the same reasoning as above, this term is also O((log n/n)β/(2β+1) ).
By the proof of Proposition 3 of [26], we have that for f0 ∈ HSS (β, R, ε),
sup |hf0 , ψlk i| ≥ d(b, R, β, ψ)2−j(β+1/2) .
(l,k):l≥j
˜
Let J˜n (β) be such that 2 (n/ log n)1/(2β+1) ≤ 2Jn (β) ≤ (n/ log n)1/(2β+1) , where = (b, R, β, ψ) >
0 is small enough so that d/β+1/2 > γ 0 . Using this yields
r
r
log n
d(b, R, β, ψ) log n
sup
|hf0 , ψlk i| ≥
> γ0
.
β+1/2
n
n
(l,k):l≥J˜n (β)
We therefore have that on the event Bn , there exists (l0 , k 0 ) with l0 ≥ J˜n (β) such that f˜l0 k0 6= 0
and a non-zero coefficient therefore appears in the definition (4.5) of σn,γ . We can thus lower
bound
s
r
β
log n
2J˜n (β) log n
log n 2β+1
0
σn,γ ≥ vn
sup |ψl0 k0 (x)| ≥ c(ψ)vn
= c vn
.
(7.8)
n x∈[0,1]
n
n
Now, since vn → ∞ as n → ∞, we have from (7.7) and the remark after it that for sufficiently
large n (depending on β and R), the last two terms in (7.6) satisfy
||(id − πmed ) ◦ πJn (γ) (f0 )||∞ + ||πJnc (γ) (f0 )||∞ ≤ C
log n
n
β
2β+1
≤ σn,γ /2.
For the first term in (7.6) we recall that on Bn , the posterior median only picks up
coefficients (l, k) with l ≤ Jn (β) ≤ Jn . Therefore on this event,
X
||πmed (f0 − Y )||∞ ≤ sup
|f0,lk − Ylk ||ψlk (x)|
x∈[0,1]
(l,k):f˜lk 6=0
r
≤ C(ψ)
log n
n
X
(l,k):l≤Jn (β)
29
2
l/2
≤C
0
log n
n
1
2β+1
.
Using the lower bound (7.8), we deduce that on Bn , ||πmed (f0 − Y )||∞ ≤ σn,γ (Y )/2 for
n large enough, uniformly over f0 ∈ HSS (β, R). Combining all of the above yields that
Bn ⊂ {||f0 − πmed (Y )||∞ ≤ σn,γ }. We therefore conclude that
√
P0 (f0 ∈ Dn ) = P0 ({||f0 − Y||M(w) ≤ Rn / n} ∩ {||f0 − πmed (Y )||∞ ≤ σn,γ } ∩ Bn ) + o(1)
√
= P0 ({||f0 − Y||M(w) ≤ Rn / n} ∩ Bn ) + o(1)
= 1 − γ + o(1),
√
where we have used that P0 (Bn ) → 1 and that P0 (||f0 − Y||M(w) ≤ Rn / n) → 1 − γ by
Theorem 5 of [12]. Noting finally that both of these probabilities converge uniformly over the
relevant self-similar Sobolev balls, the coverage statement also holds uniformly as required.
For the credibility statement it suffices to show that the second constraint in (4.6) is satisfied with posterior probability tending to 1. Again using that ||πmed (f0 − Y )||∞ ≤ σn,γ (Y )/2
on Bn as well as (7.8), we have that uniformly over f0 ∈ H(β, R),
E0 Π(f : ||f − πmed (Y )||∞ ≥ σn,γ | Y )
≤ E0 Π(f : ||f − f0 ||∞ ≥ σn,γ /2 | Y ) + E0 Π(f : ||f0 − πmed (Y )||∞ ≥ σn,γ /2 | Y )
≤ E0 Π(f : ||f − f0 ||∞ ≥ c0 vn ((log n)/n)β/(2β+1) /2 | Y ) + P0 (Bnc ) → 0
since the posterior contracts at rate (log n/n)β/(2β+1) by Theorem 3.1 of [27].
7.4
Posterior independence of the credible sets
Proof of Theorem 5.1. We first consider the fixed-regularity prior Πα with α ∈ [0, an ], re(α)
placing the sets C̃n and Cn`2 respectively by the (1 − γ)-H(δ)-credible ball Cn and the
(α,`2 )
(1 − γ)-`2 -credible ball Cn
for Πα (· | Y ) (i.e. (4.1) and (5.1) for Πα (· | Y ) rather than
Πα̂n (· | Y )). By the definition of the posterior distribution (3.1), we can write a posterior
draw f ∼ Πα (· | Y ) as
∞
X
1
√
f − fˆn,α =
ζ e ,
2α+1 + n k k
k
k=1
where ζk ∼ N (0, 1) are independent and fˆn,α is the posterior mean. Let kn → ∞ be some
sequence satisfying kn = o(n1/(4α+2) ). We shall prove the result by showing that the H(δ)credible ball is determined by the frequencies k ≤ kn , while the `2 -credible ball is determined
by the frequencies k ≥ kn . We therefore decompose both credible balls according to the
threshold kn .
By Lemma 1 of [32], which can be adapted to the case D = ∞, and some elementary
computations, we have the following exponential inequalities for any x ≥ 0:
r
∞
2
X
ζk
C(δ)
x
x
P
≥
log kn +
+
≤ e−x ,
(7.9)
kn kn
k(log k)2δ
(log kn )2δ
k=kn +1
P
kn
X
!
p
ζk2 ≥ kn + 2 kn x + 2x
≤ e−x ,
(7.10)
1 √
1
− 23/2 n− 4α+2 x ≤ e−x ,
4α
(7.11)
k=1
P
∞
X
k=kn +1
ζk2
k 2α+1 +
2α
n
≤ n− 2α+1
30
where C(δ) < ∞ for δ > 1/2. Moreover, note that
P
kn
X
k=1
ζk2
x
≤
n
(k 2α+1 + n)k(log k)2δ−1
!
p
≤ P ζ12 /2 ≤ x ≤ x/π,
(7.12)
using that ζ1 is standard normal. Define the event
(
)
kn
∞
X
X
ζk2
3C(δ)
2
Ãn,α =
≤
∩
ζk ≤ 5kn
k(log k)2δ
(log kn )2δ−1
k=kn +1
k=1
∞
X
2α
ζk2
1 − 2α+1
n
∩
≥
k 2α+1 + n
8an
k=kn +1
(k
)
n
X
ζk2
1
∩
≥
.
δ−1/2
(k 2α+1 + n)k(log k)2δ−1
n(log
k
)
n
k=1
1/(2an +1) in (7.11) and
Setting x = kn in the inequalities (7.9) and (7.10), x = 2−9 a−2
n n
x = (log kn )−(δ−1/2) in (7.12) yields
sup Πα (Ãcn,α | Y ) ≤ 2e−kn + e−2
−9 a−2 n1/(2an +1)
n
√
+ (log kn )−(2δ−1)/4 / π → 0
α∈[0,an ]
as n → ∞, since an ≤ log n/(6 log log n) by assumption. We have that on Ãn,α ,
∞
X
2α
ζk2
1 − 2α+1
5kn
n
≤ ||f − fˆn,α ||22 ≤
+
,
8an
n
k 2α+1 + n
k=kn +1
k
n
X
ζk2
1
3C(δ)
ˆn,α ||2
≤
||f
−
f
≤
+
.
H(δ)
2α+1
(k
+ n)k(log k)2δ
n(log kn )2δ−1
n(log kn )δ−1/2
k=1
√
(α)
Recall that Cn has radius equal to Rn / n, where Rn (Y, γ) →P0 R(γ) > 0 by Theorem
(α,` )
1 of [11]. Similarly, Cn 2 has radius Qn n−α/(2α+1) , where Qn → Q > 0 by Theorem
1 of [20]. Using these facts, the above bounds and the definition of kn , the probability
31
(α)
(α,`2 )
Πα (Cn ∩ Cn
| Y ) equals
o
n
2α
R2
||f − fˆn ||2H(δ) ≤ n , ||f − fˆn ||22 ≤ Q2n n− 2α+1 ∩ Ãn Y + o(1)
n
X
kn
ζk2
1 2
−(2δ−1)
= Πα
≤
R
+
O
(log
k
)
,
n
n
n
(k 2α+1 + n)k(log k)2δ
k=1
∞
X
2α
1
ζk2
− 2α+1
− 2α+1
2
∩ Ãn Y + o(1)
n
≤ Qn + O kn n
k 2α+1 + n
Πα
k=kn +1
1
∞
ζk2
ζk2
Rn2 + o(1) X
Q2n + o(n− 4α+2 )
= Πα
≤
,
≤
Y + o(1)
2α
n
k 2α+1 + n
(k 2α+1 + n)k(log k)2δ
n 2α+1
k=1
k=kn +1
!
kn
X
ζk2
Rn2 + o(1)
= Πα
≤
Y
n
(k 2α+1 + n)k(log k)2δ
k=1
1
∞
− 4α+2
2
2
X
ζk
Q + o(n
)
≤ n
Y + o(1),
× Πα
2α
2α+1
k
+n
n 2α+1
X
kn
k=kn +1
where in the last line we have used the independence of the coordinates under the posterior.
Using again the inequalities (7.9)-(7.12), the final line equals
Πα ||f − fˆn,α ||2H(δ) ≤ (Rn2 + o(1))/n Y
2α
1
× Πα ||f − fˆn,α ||22 ≤ Q2n + o(n− 4α+2 ) n− 2α+1 Y + o(1)
(2)
=: Π(1)
α,n × Πα,n + o(1).
Since supα∈[0,an ] Πα (Ãcn,α | Y ) → 0, the previous display holds uniformly over α ∈ [0, an ] so
that we have shown
sup
(2)
Πα (Cn(α) ∩ Cn(α,`2 ) | Y ) − Π(1)
α,n × Πα,n = o(1).
(7.13)
α∈[0,an ]
For the full empirical Bayes posterior, note that the second constraint in (4.2) is satisfied
with posterior probability 1 − oP0 (1) uniformly over f0 ∈ Q(β, R) by the proof of Proposition
4.1, so that it suffices to prove the theorem with Cn in (4.1) instead of C̃n . Since an = o(log n),
we can take kn → ∞ such that kn = o(n1/(4an +2) ), from which also kn = o(n1/(4α+2) ) for all
α ∈ [0, an ], the interval over which α̂n ranges. By (7.13), it therefore remains to check that
(1)
(2)
Πα̂n ,n , Πα̂n ,n →P0 1 − γ as n → ∞.
For this we require a finer understanding of the posterior behaviour of the norms in
(1)
the second to last display. Consider firstly Πα̂n ,n . By Theorem 3.1 and Lemma 8.2, Πα̂n
satisfies a weak BvM in H(δ) with centering fˆn = fˆn,α̂ instead of Y. By Theorem 1 of [11],
n
Rn →P0 Φ̃−1 (1 − γ) > 0, where Φ̃ is defined via Φ̃(t) = N (kZkH(δ) ≤ t) and we recall N is
(1)
the law of the white noise Z as an element of H(δ). Note that Πα̂n ,n equals
N (kZkH(δ)
√
ˆ
≤ Rn + o(1)) + O sup |Πα̂n ( n||f − fn,α̂n ||H(δ) ≤ t|Y ) − N (kZkH(δ) ≤ t)| .
t≥0
32
Since Φ̃ is strictly monotone and continuous, the first term equals Φ̃(Rn + o(1)) = (1 − γ) +
oP0 (1). Using that H(δ)-norm balls form a uniformity class for N (see the proof of Theorem
1 of [11]), the second term is oP0 (1) as required.
(2)
We now turn our attention to Πα̂n ,n . By Theorem 1 of [29], supf0 ∈Q(β,R) P0 (α̂n ∈
[αn , αn ]) → 1, where αn , αn are defined in Section 8.5. By Lemma 1(i) of [29], αn ≥ β −
C/ log n ≥ β/2 for n large enough. Since also α̂n ≤ an by the choice (3.2), supf0 ∈Q(β,R) P0 (α̂n ∈
[β/2, an ]) → 1 and we may therefore restrict α̂n to this interval.
By Theorem 1 of Freedman [20], we have that for f ∼ Πα (·|Y ),
p
kf − fˆn,α k22 = Cn,α + Dn,α Zn,α ,
R∞
R∞
4α+1
2α
where Cn,α n 2α+1 → Cα = 0 (1 + u2α+1 )−1 du, Dn,α n 2α+1 → Dα = 2 0 (1 + u2α+1 )−2 du,
Zn,α has mean 0, variance 1 and Zn,α →d N (0, 1) as n → ∞. We wish to make these three
convergence statements uniform over α ∈ [β/2, an ]. The first two statements essentially follow
from [20] upon keeping careful track of the remainder terms. Let gα (u) = 1/(1 + u2α+1 ).
2α
P∞
2α+1 + n) and n 2α+1 /(k 2α+1 + n) = h g (kh ), where
First note that Cn,α =
n α
n
k=1 1/(k
2α
hn = n−1/(2α+1) . Using these yields that for any L > 0, |Cn,α n 2α+1 − Cα | is bounded above
by
L/hn
X
Z
hn gα (khn ) −
gα (u)du +
0
k=1
∞
X
L
Z
∞
hn gα (khn ) +
gα (u)du.
L
k=L/h+1
The second and third terms are easily bounded by L−2α /(2α). The first term is just the error
RL
when approximating 0 gα with its (right) Riemann sum with L/h points, which is bounded
1
1
by kgα0 kL∞ [0,L] L2 /(2L/hn ). One can show that kgα0 kL∞ [0,∞) = α1− 2α+1 (α+1)1+ 2α+1 /(2α+1).
Substituting this into the bound for the Riemann sum and optimizing the three terms over
L gives that the previous display is bounded by a multiple of
1
α
1
1
(2α)2− 2α+1 (2α + 2)1+ 2α+1
2α + 1
2α
! 2α+1
2α
hn2α+1 .
It can be checked that over the range 0 < β/2 ≤ α ≤ an → ∞, the above display without
2α
the hn2α+1 term is maximized at an for n large enough, whereupon it can be bounded by
2α
−
2α
a constant multiple of an . The continuous function α 7→ hn2α+1 = n (2α+1)2 has a single
minimum on [0, ∞) occurring at α = 1/2, is strictly decreasing on [0, 1/2], strictly increasing
on [1/2, ∞) and attains its maximal value of 1 at α = 0, ∞. Since we consider only the region
α ≥ β/2, it follows that the maximum will occur at an for n large enough, depending only
on β. We have therefore shown that the previous display is bounded above by
log n
− 2an 2
(2a
+1)
n
C(β)an n
≤ C(β) exp log an −
→ 0,
4an
where the inequality holds for n large enough (depending on an ) and the convergence to zero
2α
follows since an ≤ log n/(6 log n log n) by assumption. In conclusion, supα∈[β/2,an ] |Cn,α n 2α+1 −
4α+1
Cα | → 0. Identical computations yield that supα∈[β/2,an ] |Dn,α n 2α+1 − Dα | → 0.
33
It remains only to show the uniformity of the convergence in distribution, which is based
on the central limit theorem (Theorem 1 of [20]). Under the posterior,
−1/2
Zn,α = Dn,α
∞
X
k=1
1
k 2α+1 + n
2
(ζn,k
− 1) =:
∞
X
Xn,k ,
k=1
where ζn,k ∼ N (0, 1) are independent and
−1/2 2
Xn,k = Dn,α
(ζn,k − 1)/(k 2α+1 + n)
are also independent. Recalling the exact definition of Dn,α from Theorem 1 of [20], Dn,α =
P
Pn1/(2α+1) −2 1 −2+ 1
r
2α+1 + n)−2 ≥ 1
2α+1 . Letting λ = E|ζ 2
2 ∞
n = 2n
r
k=1 (k
k=1
n,k − 1| ,
2
∞
X
−3/2
E|Xn,k |3 ≤ Dn,α
λ3
n1/(2α+1)
X
k=1
k=1
1
1
+
n3
X
k −6α−3
k>n1/(2α+1)
1
1
≤ 2(2n2− 2α+1 )3/2 λ3 n−3+ 2α+1 = 25/2 λ3 n− 4α+2 .
Let Fn,α and Φ denote the cdfs of Zn,α and the standard normal distribution respectively. By
the Berry-Esseen theorem for infinite arrays (Theorem 3.2 of [21] with summability matrix
pn,k ≡ 1), there exists a universal constant C0 such that
kFn,α − Φk∞ ≤ C0
∞
X
1
E|Xn,k |3 ≤ 25/2 C0 λ3 n− 4α+2 ,
k=1
which implies supα∈[β/2,an ] kFn,α − Φk∞ → 0 since an = o(log n).
We have shown that
p
2α+1/2
2α
kf − fˆn,α k22 = (Cα + o(1))n− 2α+1 + ( Dα + o(1))n− 2α+1 Zn,α ,
where all o(1) terms and the convergence in distribution are uniform over α ∈ [β/2, an ]. We
(2)
consequently see that the remainder term in the posterior probability Πα,n only changes this
(2)
probability by o(1) for any α ∈ [β/2, an ] and so Πα̂n ,n = (1 − γ) + oP0 (1).
(2)
Proof of Theorem 5.3. Throughout we will write Tn instead of Tn for convenience, where
ˆ
if j ≤ j0 (n),
fn,jk
(2)
Tn,jk = Yjk 1{f˜jk 6=0} if j0 (n) < j ≤ blog n/ log 2c.
0
if blog n/ log 2c < j,
and fˆn denotes the posterior mean of the slab and spike procedure. Since the second constraint
in (4.6) is satisfied with posterior probability 1 − oP0 (1) uniformly over f0 ∈ H(β, R) by the
proof of Proposition 4.5, it suffices to prove the theorem
p with Dn in (4.4) instead of Dn . Let
f0 ∈ H(β, R) and jn → ∞ satisfy jn ≤ j0 (n), wjn ≤ j0 (n) and wj2n 2jn = o(2j0 (n) ). Similarly
to Theorem 5.1, we shall decompose both credible balls according to the threshold jn . For
this we must understand the typical sizes of the projections of f − Tn in both norms under
the posterior.
34
Consider firstly k · kM . For the frequencies l > j0 (n),
||π>j0 (n) (f −Tn )||M ≤ ||π>j0 (n) (f −f0 )||M +||π>j0 (n) (f0 −Y)||M +||π>j0 (n) (Y−Tn )||M . (7.14)
p
The third term is OP0 (wj−1
(log n)/n) by the proof of Lemma 8.5. For the first term, on
(n)
0
the event An defined in (7.1),
max wl−1 max |flk − f0,lk | ≤
l>j0 (n)
k
max
wl−1 max |flk − f0,lk | + max wl−1 max |f0,lk |
k
k
l>Jn (β)
p
p
−1
−1
≤ wj0 (n) (log n)/n + wJn (β) (log n)/n
p
= O(wj−1
(log n)/n).
(n)
0
j0 (n)<l≤Jn (β)
For the second term in (7.14),
E0 ||π>j0 (n) (f0 − Y)||M(w)
p
j0 (n)
√ E0 ||π>j0 (n) (Z)||M(√l) = O
≤
wj0 (n) n
!
p
j0 (n)
√
wj0 (n) n
using that E0 ||Z||M(√l) is finite by Proposition 2 of [12]. Combining these yields
Π(f : ||π>j0 (n) (f − Tn )||M = O(wj−1
0 (n)
p
(log n)/n) | Y ) = 1 − oP0 (1)
since j0 (n) . log n.
(2)
Recall that by definition Tn,lk equals the posterior mean for l ≤ j0 (n) (see (8.6)), so that
τ2
(2)
flk − Tn,lk |Ylk ∼ N 0,
,
0 ≤ l ≤ j0 (n),
1 + nτ 2
under the posterior. For
√ (ζlk ) i.i.d. standard Gaussians, we have the well-known bound
E max0≤k<2l |ζlk | ≤ C l for some universal constant C. Applying the Borell-SudakovTsirelson inequality [35] to the maximum at level l yields that for M > 0 large enough,
p
Π(f :k(π>jn − π>j0 (n) )(f − Tn )kM ≥ M jn wj−1
n−1/2 |Y )
n
√
1
M jn
τ
√
=P
max
ζlk ≥
max √
wj n n
jn <l≤j0 (n) wl 0≤k<2l
1 + nτ 2
!
√
√
j0 (n)
X
M jn wl 1 + nτ 2
√
≤
P max |ζlk | − E max |ζlk | >
− E max |ζlk |
wjn nτ
0≤k<2l
0≤k<2l
0≤k<2l
l=jn +1
!2
√
j0 (n)
X
w
j
0
l
√n − C l ≤ Ce−c jn → 0.
≤2
exp −c M
wj n l
l=jn +1
Combining this with the above inequalities gives
p
Π(f : ||π>jn (f − Tn )||M = O(wj−1
(log n)/n) | Y ) = 1 − oP0 (1).
0 (n)
(7.15)
We now show that the k · kM -norm of the remaining frequencies j ≤ jn is of strictly larger
size with high probability. For any un → 0,
√
Π(f : ||πjn (f − Tn )||M ≤ w0 un n−1/2 | Y ) ≤ Π(f : |ζ00 | ≤ cun | Y ) ≤ 2ceun / 2π = o(1).
(7.16)
35
√
In particular, taking un log n/wj0 (n) gives the result.
Turn now to k · kB∞1
0 . For f ∈ Dn ,
||πjn (f − Tn )||B∞1
=
0
jn
X
2l/2 max |flk − Tn,lk | ≤
k
l=0
jn
X
l=0
Rn
2l/2 wl √ = OP0
n
wjn 2jn /2
√
n
!
. (7.17)
Note that
Π(f : kπ>jn (f − Tn )kB∞1
≤ c2
0
j0 (n)/2
p
j0 (n)/n | Y ) ≤ P
max
0≤k<2j0 (n)
ζj0 (n)k
p
≥ c j0 (n) .
0
(7.18)
Using again the Borell-Sudakov-Tsirelson inequality as above gives that the right-hand side
00
is O(2−c j0 (n) ) for c > 0 small enough. Combining
(7.15)-(7.18), we have shown that for some
√
C1 , ..., C4 > 0 and un → 0 such that un log n/wj0 (n) ,
√
n
log n
√ ,
Ān := ||π>jn (f − Tn )||M ≤ C1
wj0 (n) n
||πjn (f − Tn )||B∞1
0
un
kπjn (f − Tn )kM ≥ C2 √ ,
n
wj 2jn /2
,
≤ C3 n√
n
kπ>jn (f − Tn )kB∞1
0
p
j0 (n)2j0 (n)/2 o
√
≥ C4
n
satisfies Π(Ān |Y ) = 1 − oP0 (1).
√
Write δn := wjn 2jn /2 / n. Note that by the previous display and the assumptions
on the
p
√
∞
L
j
(n)
0
growth of jn → ∞, the radius Q̄n (γ) of the credible set Dn satisfies Q̄n & j0 (n)2
/ n
δn with P0 -probability tending to one. Using the independence of the different coordinates
∞
under the posterior, the probability Π(Dn ∩ DnL | Y ) equals
√
Π ||f − Tn ||M ≤ Rn / n, ||f − Tn ||∞ ≤ Q̄n ∩ Ān | Y + oP0 (1)
n
p
√
= Π ||πjn (f − Tn )||M ≤ (Rn + O(wj−1
log
n))/
n,
(n)
0
o
≤ Q̄n + O(δn ) ∩ Ān | Y + oP0 (1)
||π>jn (f − Tn )||B∞1
0
√
= Π f : ||πjn (f − Tn )||M ≤ (Rn + o(1))/ n | Y
× Π f : ||π>jn (f − Tn )||B∞1
≤ Q̄n + O(δn ) | Y + oP0 (1).
0
Again using that Π(Ān |Y ) = 1 − oP0 (1), the final line equals
√
Π f : ||f − Tn ||M ≤ (Rn + o(1))/ n
× Π f : ||f − Tn ||B∞1
≤ Q̄n + O(δn ) | Y + oP0 (1).
0
(7.19)
We now check that the above product has asymptotically the correct posterior probability.
By the same argument as in Theorem 5.1 (replacing H(δ) by M), the first probabilityP
equals
(1 − γ) + oP0 (1). Setting Ml = 2l/2 max0≤k<2l |flk − Tn,lk |, we have kf − Tn kB∞1
= l Ml ,
0
where the (Ml ) are independent due to the product structure of the posterior. We can
therefore write the posterior density of kf − Tn kB∞1
as hn ∗ Gn , where Mj0 (n) has density hn
0
P
and l6=j0 (n) Ml has probability distribution Gn , both supported on [0, ∞).
36
Using standard extreme value theory, we can establish the limiting distribution of Mj0 (n) .
For Zi ∼ N (0, 1) independent, we have a−1
m (max1≤i≤m |Zi | − bm ) converges in distribution to
the standard Gumbel distribution (i.e. distribution function F (x) = exp(−e−x )), where
p
1
log(4π log 2m)
1
√
am = √
,
bm = 2 log 2m −
+O
log m
2 log 2m
2 2 log 2m
2
(bm is the solution to 2m2 = πb2m ebm ). This follows from Theorem 10.5.2(c) and Example
10.5.3 of [18] with only minor modifications due to the absolute values within the maximum
(intuitively it is the same as the maximum of 2m standard Gaussians). Moreover, by Pólya’s
Theorem (p. 265 of [16]) the convergence of the distribution functions is uniform:
sup |(Φ(am x + bm ) − Φ(−am x − bm ))m − exp(−e−x )| → 0,
(7.20)
x∈R
where we recall |Zi | has distribution function Φ(x) − Φ(−x).
Recall that Mj0 (n) is the sum of i.i.d. (rescaled) Gaussians under the posterior. Using
that Q̄n is the (1 − γ)-posterior quantile for kf − Tn kB∞1
0 ,
|Π(f :||f − Tn ||B∞1
≤ Q̄n + O(δn ) | Y ) − (1 − γ)|
0
X
≤ Π Q̄n − cδn ≤
Ml ≤ Q̄n + cδn Y
l
Z
Q̄n +cδn
Z
∞
hn (x − y)dGn (y)dx
=
Q̄n −cδn
Z
0
∞ Z Q̄n −y+cδn
hn (z)dGn (y)
=
0
Q̄n −y−cδn
≤ sup P(Mj0 (n) ∈ [t − cδn , t + cδn ]).
t≥0
Using the limiting distribution of Mj0 (n) , (7.20) and that the maximum of the standard
Gumbel density function is e−1 , the last probability equals
!
2j0 (n)/2 τ
max |ζj0 (n)k | ∈ [t − cδn , t + cδn ]
P √
1 + nτ 2 0≤k<2j0 (n)
!
√
2
1
+
nτ
= P a−1
max |ζ
| − b2j0 (n) ∈ a−1
[t − b2j0 (n) − cδn , t − b2j0 (n) + cδn ]
2j0 (n) 0≤k<2j0 (n) j0 (n)k
2j0 (n) 2j0 (n)/2 τ
!
√
1 + nτ 2
−1
≤ P Gumbel(0, 1) ∈ a2j0 (n) j (n)/2 [t − b2j0 (n) − cδn , t − b2j0 (n) + cδn ] + o(1)
20
τ
r
p
jn −j0 (n)
nj0 (n)
0 −1
2
+ o(1) → 0,
≤ c0 e−1
δ
+
o(1)
=
c
e
w
j
(n)2
n
j
0
n
2j0 (n)
by the choice of jn . In conclusion, we have shown that the second probability in (7.19) equals
(1 − γ) + oP0 (1). This completes the proof.
37
7.5
Remaining proofs
Proof of Proposition 3.3. Fix ρ > 1, let ε = ε(α, ρ, R) < (1 − ρ−2α )/(2αR) be sufficiently
PdρN e
small so that ε ∈ (0, 1) and consider the events Aα,N = { k=N fk2 < εRN −2α }. By a simple
PdρN e
integral comparison we have that k=N k −2α−1 ≥ (2α)−1 N −2α (1 − ρ−2α ), so that under the
conditional prior,
dρN e
X
Πα (Aα,N ) = P
k −2α−1 gk2 < εRN −2α
k=N
1
k −2α−1 (gk2 − 1) < εRN −2α −
≤ P
N −2α (1 − ρ−2α )
2α
k=N
dρN e
X
k −2α−1 (gk2 − 1) < −ε0 N −2α ,
≤ P
dρN e
X
k=N
where the gk ’s are i.i.d. standard normal random variables and ε0 > 0 (by the choice of ε).
By (4.2) of Lemma 1 of [32] we have the exponential inequality
1/2
dρN e
dρN e
X
X
√
k −4α−2
P
k −2α−1 (gk2 − 1) ≤ −2
x ≤ e−x .
k=N
k=N
PdρN e
For N ≥ 2, again by an integral comparison we have that k=N k −4α−2 ≤ C(α)N −4α−1 .
Using this and letting x = M N , the exponential inequality becomes
dρN e
X
√
k −2α−1 (gk2 − 1) ≤ −C 0 (α) M N −2α ≤ e−M N .
P
k=N
√
Taking M sufficiently small so that C 0 (α) M < ε0 , we obtain that Πα (Aα,N ) ≤ e−M N . Since
this sequence is summable in N , the result follows from the first Borel-Cantelli Lemma.
√
Proof of Proposition 3.7. Under the law P0 , nE0 ||Y − f0 ||M(w) = E0 ||Z||M(w) < ∞ by
Proposition 2 of [12]. By the triangle inequality it therefore suffices to show the conclusion of
Proposition 3.7 with Y replaced by f0 . Rewrite the multiscale indices Λ = {(l, k) : l ≥ 0, k =
0, ..., 2l − 1} in increasing lexicographic order, so that Λ = {(lm , km ) : m ∈ N}, where
lm = i,
if
2i ≤ m < 2i+1 ,
i = 0, 1, 2, ...,
km = m − 2i ,
if
2i ≤ m < 2i+1 ,
i = 0, 1, 2, ...
Consider a strictly increasing subsequence (nm )m≥1 of N such that (log nm )/wl2m → ∞ as
m → ∞ (such a subsequence can be constructed for any admissible (wl ) since wl % ∞).
Define a function f0 ∈ `2 via its wavelet coefficients
p
hf0 , ψlm km i = r log nm /nm ,
38
where r ≤ γ for γ the value given in the proof of Theorem 7.5. Since
r
2
lm (β+1/2)
β+1/2
|hf0 , ψlm km i| ≤ rm
log nm
,
nm
we can ensure f0 is in any given Hölder ball H(β, R) by letting r be sufficiently small and
taking the subsequence nm to grow fast enough. Consider now a further subsequence,
removing terms corresponding to one index per resolution level, say (l, kl ) (i.e. removing terms with indices m = 2l + kl , l = 0, 1, 2, ..., from the above subsequence), and set
0
|hf0 , ψlkl i| = R2−l(β+1/2) . Using the Besov space embedding L∞ ⊂ B∞∞
,
||Kj (f ) − f ||∞ ≥ C(ψ) max 2l/2 max |hf0 , ψlk i|
l>j
k
≥ C(ψ)2(j+1)/2 |hf0 , ψ(j+1)kj+1 i| = C(ψ)R2−β 2−jβ = ε(β, R, ψ)2−jβ ,
thereby establishing that f0 ∈ HSS (β, R, ε).
Let An denote the event defined in (7.1). We have that on Anm , the posterior distribution
0
Π (· | Y (nm ) ) assigns the (lm , km ) coordinate to the Dirac mass component of the distribution.
Consequently, by the choice of (nm ),
E0 Π0 ( ||f − f0 ||M ≤ Mnm nm −1/2 | Y (nm ) )
= E0 Π0 ({||f − f0 ||M ≤ Mnm nm −1/2 } ∩ Anm | Y (nm ) ) + o(1)
≤ E0 Π0 ({|flm km − f0,lm km | ≤ Mnm wlm nm −1/2 } ∩ Anm | Y (nm ) ) + o(1)
p
= E0 Π0 ({r log nm /nm ≤ Mnm wlm n−1/2
} ∩ Anm | Y (nm ) ) + o(1)
m
p
≤ E0 Π0 (r log nm /wlm ≤ Mnm | Y (nm ) ) + o(1) = o(1)
√
for any sequence Mn such that Mnm = o(wl−1
log nm ) as m → ∞.
m
8
8.1
Technical facts and results
Results for `2 -setting
The following two lemmas describe the behaviour of the posterior mean of the empirical
Bayes procedure. The first says that the posterior mean is a consistent estimator of f0 in
a sequence of Sobolev norms with data driven exponent. In particular, we are interested in
the case n → 0 when the Sobolev exponent tends to the true smoothness β. Note that we
require n strictly positive since the posterior mean is itself not an element of H α̂n . The
−1/2,δ
second says that fˆn is an efficient estimator of f0 in H2
. Both proofs are similar to that
of Theorem 2 of [29] and are thus omitted.
Lemma 8.1. Let fˆn denote the posterior mean of the empirical Bayes procedure and let
n > 0. Then for every β, R > 0 and Mn → ∞, we have
sup
P0 ||fˆn − f0 ||H α̂n −n ≥ Mn → 0
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
as n → ∞.
39
Lemma 8.2. Let fˆn denote the posterior mean of the empirical Bayes procedure. Then for
f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε), δ > 1 and as n → ∞,
√
||fˆn − Y||H(δ) = oP0 (1/ n).
We have an exponential inequality which measures posterior spread in a variety of Sobolev
norms. Since for fixed α, the posterior only depends on the data through the posterior mean
fˆn,α , the following probabilities are independent of the observed data Y .
Lemma 8.3. Let fˆn,α denote the posterior mean of Πα (· | Y ). Then for any 0 ≤ s < α and
any η > 0,
2(α−s)
1
− 2α+1
2
ˆ
Πα f : ||f − fn,α ||H s ≥ (1 + η) 1 +
n
Y
2(α − s)
η
1
1/4
1/(4α+2)
√
.
≤ e exp −
1+
n
2(α − s)
24
Proof. For f ∼ Πα (· | Y ) we can use the explicit form of the posterior mean in (3.1) to write
||f − fˆn,α ||2H s =
∞
X
k=1
k 2s
ζ 2,
+n k
k 2α+1
where the ζk ∼ N (0, 1) are independent. Letting tn = n1/(2α+1) and using standard tail
bounds,
∞
h
i X
EΠ ||f − fˆn,α ||2H s | Y =
k 2s
1 X 2s X −2(α−s)−1
≤
k +
k
k 2α+1 + n
n
k=1
k≤tn
k>tn
2(α−s)
1
≤ 1+
n− 2α+1 .
2(α − s)
The posterior variance of ||f − fˆn,α ||2H s is given by
ν2 = 2
∞
X
k=1
4(α−s)+1
2 X 4s X −4(α−s)−2
k 4s
≤ 2
k +
k
≤ 3n− 2α+1 .
2
+ n)
n
(k 2α+1
k≤tn
k>tn
Combining the above with the exponential inequality for χ2 -squared random variables found
in Proposition 6 of [46], we have
!
∞
√
X
k 2s
1/4 −x/ 8
2
e e
≥P
(ζ − 1) ≥ νx
k 2α+1 + n k
k=1
√ − 4(α−s)+1
2(α−s)
1
− 2α+1
2
ˆ
4α+2
≥ Πα f : ||f − fn,α ||H s ≥ 1 +
n
+ 3n
x Y .
2(α − s)
√
Taking x = (η/ 3)[1 + 1/(2α − 2s)]n1/(4α+2) gives the desired result.
40
8.2
Results for L∞ -setting
To prove Proposition 4.5 we need to understand the behaviour of the posterior median under
the law P0 .
Lemma 8.4. Let f˜ = f˜n denote the posterior median (defined coordinate-wise) of the slab
and spike prior. Then the event
Bn = {f˜lk = 0 ∀(l, k) ∈ Jnc (γ)} ∩ {f˜lk 6= 0 ∀(l, k) ∈ Jn (γ 0 )}
√
∩ { n|Ylk − f0,lk | ≤ (8l log 2 + a log n)1/2 ∀l ≤ Jn , ∀k = 0, ..., 2l − 1}
(8.1)
satisfies inf f0 ∈H(β,R) P0 (Bn ) → 1 as n → ∞, for some constants 0 < γ < γ 0 < ∞ and a > 0.
Proof. We show that the P0 -probability of each of these events individually tends to 1. For
the first event
{f˜lk = 0 ∀(l, k) ∈ Jnc (γ)} ⊇ {Π(flk = 0 | Y ) ≥ 1/2
∀(l, k) ∈ Jnc (γ)}
⊇ {Π(flk = 0 ∀(l, k) ∈ Jnc (γ)) ≥ 1/2}
= {Π(S ∩ Jnc (γ) = ∅) ≥ 1/2}.
By Lemma 1 of [27] the P0 -probability of this last event tends to 1 for some γ > 0 as n → ∞.
Consider the third event,
√
Ωn = { n|Ylk − f0,lk | ≤ (8l log 2 + a log n)1/2 ∀l ≤ Jn , ∀k = 0, ..., 2l − 1},
which by (41) of [27] (or the Borell-Sudakov-Tsireslon inequality [35]) satisfies P0 (Ωcn ) → 0.
We shall lastly show that
Ωn ⊂ {f˜lk 6= 0 ∀(l, k) ∈ Jn (γ 0 )},
(8.2)
which then completes the proof.
Consider firstly the case f0,lk ∈ Jn (γ 0 ) with f0,lk > 0. Write
Π(flk ≤ 0 | Y ) = Π(flk = 0 | Y ) + Π(flk < 0 | Y ).
(8.3)
By the proof of Lemma 1 of [27], we have that on the event Ωn and for sufficiently large
0 2
γ 0 , the first posterior probability in (8.3) is bounded above by a multiple of nK+1/2−(γ ) /8 .
Again on the event Ωn , we use (42) of [27] to bound the second term via
Π(flk < 0 | Y ) =
≤
wjn
R∞
−n
(x−Ylk )2
2
g(x)dx
−∞ e
2
−n
(x−Y
)
lk
2
R0
g(x)dx + (1 − wj,n )
−∞ e
R −√nYlk − 1 v2
||g||∞ −∞
e 2 dv
√
√
= C nΦ̄( nYlk ),
1/2
a(π/n)
wjn
(8.4)
where Φ̄ = 1 − Φ with Φ the distribution function of a standard normal variable. On Ωn , we
have for l ≤ Jn ,
s
r
r
2Jn log 2 + 12 log n
log n
log n
0
Ylk = (Ylk − f0,lk ) + f0,lk ≥ −
+γ
≥δ
n
n
n
41
for some δ = δ(γ 0 ) > 0 that can be made arbitrarily large by taking γ 0 large enough. Thus
applying the standard tail bounds for Φ̄ we have that the right-hand side of (8.4) is bounded
above by a multiple of
√
1
1 2
p
√
n
n2−2δ
− 12 δ 2 log n
nΦ̄(δ log n) ≤ √
e
= C(δ) √
.
δ 2π log n
log n
Combining the above results, we have that for sufficiently large γ 0 (and hence δ), (8.3) is
bounded above by a constant times n−B for some B > 0, uniformly over the positive coefficients in Jn (γ 0 ). In particular, the posterior median satisfies f˜lk > 0 for all (l, k) ∈ Jn (γ 0 )
with flk > 0 and n large enough. The case f0,lk < 0 is dealt with similarly, thereby proving
(8.2).
A simultaneous estimator in M(w) and L∞
It may be of interest to obtain an efficient estimator of f0 in M(w) that is also an element
of L∞ , unlike Y. Letting f˜ = f˜n and fˆn denote the posterior median and mean of the slab
and spike procedure respectively, define the estimators
if j ≤ j0 (n),
Yjk
(1)
Tn,jk = Yjk 1{f˜jk 6=0} if j0 (n) < j ≤ blog n/ log 2c.
(8.5)
0
if blog n/ log 2c < j,
(2)
Tn,jk
ˆ
fn,jk
= Yjk 1{f˜jk 6=0}
0
if j ≤ j0 (n),
if j0 (n) < j ≤ blog n/ log 2c.
(8.6)
if blog n/ log 2c < j.
Lemma 8.5. Consider the slab and spike prior Π with lower threshold j0 (n) → ∞ satisfying
j0 (n) = o(log n) and let (wl ) be any admissible sequence satisfying wj0 (n) = o(nv ) for any
(i)
v > 0. Then the estimators Tn , i = 0, 1, defined in (8.5) and (8.6) satisfy for some M 0 > 0
and any Mn → ∞,
√
sup P0 (||Tn(i) − f0 ||M(w) ≥ Mn / n) → 0,
f0 ∈H(β,R)
sup
f0 ∈H(β,R)
P0 (||Tn(i) − f0 ||∞ ≥ M 0 (log n/n)β/(2β+1) ) → 0
(i)
as n → ∞. Moreover, ||Tn − Y||M(w) = oP0 (n−1/2 ), uniformly over f0 ∈ H(β, R).
(i)
Proof. Since Y is an efficient estimator of f0 in M, if suffices to establish ||Tn − Y||M =
(i)
oP0 (n−1/2 ) to show that Tn is also an efficient estimator of f0 in M. Consider firstly
j > j0 (n), where the estimators coincide, and let Jn (β) be as in the proof of Theorem 7.5.
On the event Bn defined in (8.1) and following the proof of Theorem 7.5, we have
||π>j0 (n) (Tn(i) − Y)||M ≤
max
j0 (n)<l≤Jn (β)
wl−1 max |Ylk 1{f˜lk =0} | + max wl−1 max |f0,lk |
k
wl−1
l≥Jn (β)
k
max
max
(|Ylk − f0,lk | + |f0,lk |) + o(n−1/2 )
k:(l,k)∈Jnc (γ)
p
≤ Cwj−1
(log n)/n + o(n−1/2 ) = o(n−1/2 )
(n)
0
≤
j0 (n)<l≤Jn (β)
42
by the choice of j0 (n).
(1)
For j ≤ j0 (n) and i = 1, we trivially have ||πj0 (n) (Tn − Y)||M = 0. Consider now
i = 2. Arguing as in Theorem 2 of [12] and using the conditions on j0 (n), one obtains the
√
uniform bound E0 EΠ [|| nπj0 (n) (f − Y)||1+
M(w) | Y ] ≤ C() for > 0 small enough. From the
weak convergence of Π(· | Y ) ◦ τY−1 towards N and a uniform integrability argument (via the
√
moment bound), it follows as in Theorem 10 of [11] that nπj0 (n) (EΠ (f |Y ) − Y) → EN = 0
in M0 (w) in probability, which implies the result.
For L∞ we have on Bn ,
Jn (β)
2l/2 max |Ylk − f0,lk |1{(l,k)∈Jn (γ)} + |f0,lk |1{(l,k)∈Jnc (γ)}
X
||π>j0 (n) (Tn(i) − f0 )||∞ .
k
l=j0 (n)+1
∞
X
2l/2 max |f0,lk |
+
k
l=Jn (β)+1
r
Jn (β)/2
.2
log n
+ R2−Jn (β)β .
n
max |Ylk − f0,lk | . 2
j0 (n)/2
log n
n
β
2β+1
.
Now
j0 (n)
||πj0 (n) (Tn(1)
− f0 )||∞ .
X
r
2
l/2
k
l=0
(1)
log n
.
n
log n
n
β
2β+1
,
(2)
thereby proving the second statement for Tn . For Tn , using the convergence of the posterior
mean to Y in M0 for j ≤ j0 (n) shown above,
j0 (n)
||πj0 (n) (Tn(2) − Tn(1) )||∞ .
X
2l/2 max |fˆn,lk − Ylk |
k
l=0
j0 (n)
= oP0
X
l=0
8.3
l/2
2
w
√ l = oP0
n
2j0 (n)/2
wj0 (n) √
n
!
= oP0
log n
n
β
2β+1
!
.
Wavelets
Let us briefly recall the notion of periodized and boundary corrected wavelets and discuss
condition (2.3). Let φ, ψ denote a scaling and corresponding wavelet function on R satisfying
X
X
sup
|φ(x − k)| < ∞,
sup
|ψ(x − k)| < ∞.
(8.7)
x∈R k∈Z
x∈R k∈Z
Examples include Meyer wavelets (see Section 2 in [38] for other choices).
Consider firstly the periodic case. As usual define the dilated and translated wavelet at
resolution level j and scale position k/2j by φjk (x) = 2j/2 φ(2j x − k), ψjk (x) = 2j/2 ψ(2j x − k)
for j, k ∈ Z. Periodize the wavelet functions via
X
X
per
φper
φjk (x + m),
ψjk
(x) =
ψjk (x + m), x ∈ [0, 1]
jk (x) =
m∈Z
m∈Z
43
per
J0 −
for j = 0, 1, ... and k = 0, ..., 2j − 1. Then the wavelet system {φper
J0 k , ψjm : k = 0, ..., 2
1, m = 0, ..., 2j − 1, j = J0 , J0 + 1, ...} forms an orthonormal wavelet basis of L2 ((0, 1]) and
satisfies (2.3) due to (8.7).
In the case of R, an orthonormal basis of Vj = span{(φjk )k }, j ≥ J0 , can be obtained by
taking 2j−J0 dilations of the orthonormal basis (φJ0 k )k of a basic resolution space VJ0 . In the
case of boundary corrected wavelets, the analogous orthonormal basis of the basic resolution
space VJ0 , J0 ∈ N, contains 2J0 elements and consists of 3 components. At resolution level J0 ,
t
J0 /2 φlef t (2J0 x),
a basis consists of 3 components. Firstly, N left edge functions φlef
J0 k (x) = 2
k
t
k = 0, ..., N − 1, where φlef
is a modification of φ that remains bounded and has compact
k
J0 /2 φright (2J0 x), k = 0, ..., N − 1,
support. Secondly, N right edge functions φright
J0 k (x) = 2
k
with the same properties. Thirdly, 2J0 − 2N interior functions, that are the usual translates
of dilations of φ defined on R, that is φJ0 k for k = N, ..., 2J0 − N − 1, which we note are all
J0
supported in the interior of [0, 1]. Writing for convenience {φbc
J0 k : k = 0, ..., 2 − 1} instead
lef t right
of {φJ0 k , φJ0 k0 , φJ0 m : k = 0, ..., N − 1, k 0 = 0, ..., N − 1, m = N, ..., 2J0 − N − 1}, we have the
first part of (2.3)
J0 −1
2X
|φbc
J0 k (x)|
≤2
J0 /2
≤2
J0 /2
k=0
N
t
max ||φlef
k ||∞
0≤k<N
C(N, φ) + 2
J0 /2
+2
J0 /2
N
||∞
max ||φright
k
0≤k<N
+
2J0X
−N −1
2J0 /2 |φ(2J0 x − k)|
k=N
0
C (φ),
(8.8)
where we have used that N is fixed and that the original wavelet function on R satisfies (8.7).
Starting at resolution level J0 with the usual dilated wavelets on R, ψJ0 k (x) = 2J0 /2 ψ(2J0 x−
k), 2J0 ≥ N , it is possible to construct corresponding boundary wavelet functions
t
0
J0
− N − 1}.
, ψJright
{ψJlef
0 , ψJ0 m : k = 0, ..., N − 1, k = 0, ..., N − 1, m = N, ..., 2
0k
0k
For j ≥ J0 , we can then define the dilates of the boundary wavelets in the usual way:
right
(2j−J0 x).
(x) = 2(j−J0 )/2 ψJright
ψjk
0k
t j−J0
lef t
(2
x),
(x) = 2(j−J0 )/2 ψJlef
ψjk
0k
lef t
right
This yields the required wavelets at resolution level j, namely {ψjk
, ψjk
, ψjm : k =
0
0
j
0, ..., N − 1, k = 0, ..., N − 1, m = N, ..., 2 − N − 1}, which for convenience we write as
bc : k = 0, ..., 2j − 1}. Arguing as in (8.8) and again using (8.7) gives the second part of
{ψjk
(2.3).
8.4
Weak convergence
For µ and ν probability measures on a metric space (S, d), define the bounded Lipschitz
metric by
Z
βS (µ, ν) =
sup
u(s)(dµ(s) − dν(s)) ,
(8.9)
u:||u||BL ≤1
S
||u||BL = sup |u(s)| +
s∈S
|u(s) − u(t)|
.
d(s, t)
s,t∈S:s6=t
sup
βS metrizes the weak convergence of probability distributions, that is random variables
Xn →d X converge in distribution in (S, d) if and only if βS (L(Xn ), L(X)) → 0, where
−1/2,δ
L(X) denotes the law of X. In particular, we shall consider the choices S = H(δ) = H2
or S = H −s for s > 1/2 in `2 and S = M0 (w) for {wl }l≥1 an admissible sequence in L∞ .
44
8.5
Results on empirical and hierarchical Bayes procedures
Let us recall some definitions and results from [29, 48] that appear in proofs elsewhere. Define
hn : (0, ∞) → [0, ∞) to be
hn (α) =
∞
2 log k
X
n2 k 2α+1 f0,k
1 + 2α
n1/(2α+1) log n k=1 (k 2α+1 + n)2
(8.10)
and for 0 < l < L define the bounds
αn = inf{α > 0 : hn (α) > l} ∧
p
log n,
αn = inf{α > 0 : hn (α) > L(log n)2 }.
The behaviour of the empirical Bayes estimator α̂n defined in (3.2) is contained in Lemma
3.11 of [48], which is summarized below for convenience.
Lemma 8.6 (Szabó et al.). Fix βmax > 0. For any 0 < β ≤ βmax and R ≥ 1, there exist
constants K1 and K2 such that P0 (β − K1 / log n ≤ α̂n ≤ β + K2 / log n) → 1 uniformly over
f0 ∈ QSS (β, R, ε).
As mentioned in the discussion following the lemma in [48], the constant K2 is negative
for large enough R so that the estimate α̂n undersmooths the true β. We have an analogous
result in the hierarchical case.
Lemma 8.7. The posterior median αnM of the marginal posterior distribution λn (·|Y ) satisfies
inf
P0 αnM ∈ [αn , αn ] → 1
f0 ∈Q(β,R)
as n → ∞. Moreover, for C = C(β, R, ε, ρ),
inf
f0 ∈QSS (β,R,ε)
P0
αnM − β ≤ C/ log n → 1.
Proof. This follows directly from the proof of Theorem 3 of [29].
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Richard Nickl, Aad van der Vaart, Johannes Schmidt-Hieber,
the Associate Editor and two referees for their valuable comments. The author would like
to express particular thanks to one referee for a very detailed report, including suggesting a
simplified argument for Theorems 7.2 and 7.4.
References
[1] Abramovich, F., Sapatinas, T., and Silverman, B. W. Wavelet thresholding via
a Bayesian approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 60, 4 (1998), 725–749.
[2] Belitser, E., and Ghosal, S. Adaptive Bayesian inference on the mean of an infinitedimensional normal distribution. Ann. Statist. 31, 2 (2003), 536–559. Dedicated to the
memory of Herbert E. Robbins.
45
[3] Bickel, P. J., and Kleijn, B. J. K. The semiparametric Bernstein-von Mises theorem. Ann. Statist. 40, 1 (2012), 206–237.
[4] Bontemps, D. Bernstein-von Mises theorems for Gaussian regression with increasing
number of regressors. Ann. Statist. 39, 5 (2011), 2557–2584.
[5] Boucheron, S., and Gassiat, E. A Bernstein-von Mises theorem for discrete probability distributions. Electron. J. Stat. 3 (2009), 114–148.
[6] Bull, A. D. Honest adaptive confidence bands and self-similar functions. Electron. J.
Stat. 6 (2012), 1490–1516.
[7] Castillo, I. Lower bounds for posterior rates with Gaussian process priors. Electron.
J. Stat. 2 (2008), 1281–1299.
[8] Castillo, I. A semiparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorem for Gaussian process
priors. Probab. Theory Related Fields 152, 1-2 (2012), 53–99.
[9] Castillo, I. On Bayesian supremum norm contraction rates. Ann. Statist. 42, 5 (2014),
2058–2091.
[10] Castillo, I. Discussion of “Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian
credible sets”. Ann. Statist. 43, 4 (2015), 1437–1443.
[11] Castillo, I., and Nickl, R. Nonparametric Bernstein–von Mises theorems in Gaussian white noise. Ann. Statist. 41, 4 (2013), 1999–2028.
[12] Castillo, I., and Nickl, R. On the Bernstein-von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures. Ann. Statist. 42, 5 (2014), 1941–1969.
[13] Castillo, I., and Rousseau, J. A Bernstein–von Mises theorem for smooth functionals in semiparametric models. Ann. Statist. 43, 6 (2015), 2353–2383.
[14] Castillo, I., Schmidt-Hieber, J., and van der Vaart, A. Bayesian linear regression with sparse priors. Ann. Statist. 43, 5 (2015), 1986–2018.
[15] Castillo, I., and van der Vaart, A. Needles and straw in a haystack: posterior
concentration for possibly sparse sequences. Ann. Statist. 40, 4 (2012), 2069–2101.
[16] Chow, Y. S., and Teicher, H. Probability theory, second ed. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988. Independence, interchangeability, martingales.
[17] Cox, D. D. An analysis of Bayesian inference for nonparametric regression. Ann.
Statist. 21, 2 (1993), 903–923.
[18] David, H. A., and Nagaraja, H. N. Order statistics, third ed. Wiley Series in
Probability and Statistics. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], Hoboken, NJ, 2003.
[19] Diaconis, P., and Freedman, D. On the consistency of Bayes estimates. Ann. Statist.
14, 1 (1986), 1–67. With a discussion and a rejoinder by the authors.
[20] Freedman, D. On the Bernstein-von Mises theorem with infinite-dimensional parameters. Ann. Statist. 27, 4 (1999), 1119–1140.
46
[21] Fridy, J. A., Goonatilake, R. A., and Khan, M. K. On Berry-Esseen bounds of
summability transforms. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132, 1 (2004), 273–282 (electronic).
[22] Ghosal, S. Asymptotic normality of posterior distributions in high-dimensional linear
models. Bernoulli 5, 2 (1999), 315–331.
[23] Giné, E., and Nickl, R. Uniform limit theorems for wavelet density estimators. Ann.
Probab. 37, 4 (2009), 1605–1646.
[24] Giné, E., and Nickl, R. Confidence bands in density estimation. Ann. Statist. 38, 2
(2010), 1122–1170.
[25] Giné, E., and Nickl, R. Mathematical foundations of infinite-dimensional statistical models, vol. 40 of Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015.
[26] Hoffmann, M., and Nickl, R. On adaptive inference and confidence bands. Ann.
Statist. 39, 5 (2011), 2383–2409.
[27] Hoffmann, M., Rousseau, J., and Schmidt-Hieber, J. On adaptive posterior
concentration rates. Ann. Statist. 43, 5 (2015), 2259–2295.
[28] Johnstone, I. M. High dimensional Bernstein–von Mises: simple examples. In Borrowing strength: theory powering applications—a Festschrift for Lawrence D. Brown, vol. 6
of Inst. Math. Stat. Collect. Inst. Math. Statist., Beachwood, OH, 2010, pp. 87–98.
[29] Knapik, B. T., Szabó, B. T., van der Vaart, A. W., and van Zanten, J. H.
Bayes procedures for adaptive inference in inverse problems for the white noise model.
Probab. Theory Related Fields 164, 3-4 (2016), 771–813.
[30] Knapik, B. T., van der Vaart, A. W., and van Zanten, J. H. Bayesian inverse
problems with Gaussian priors. Ann. Statist. 39, 5 (2011), 2626–2657.
[31] Kueh, A. Locally adaptive density estimation on the unit sphere using needlets. Constr.
Approx. 36, 3 (2012), 433–458.
[32] Laurent, B., and Massart, P. Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by
model selection. Ann. Statist. 28, 5 (2000), 1302–1338.
[33] Le Cam, L. Asymptotic methods in statistical decision theory. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986.
[34] Leahu, H. On the Bernstein-von Mises phenomenon in the Gaussian white noise model.
Electron. J. Stat. 5 (2011), 373–404.
[35] Ledoux, M. The concentration of measure phenomenon, vol. 89 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001.
[36] Low, M. G., and Ma, Z. Discussion of “Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets”. Ann. Statist. 43, 4 (2015), 1448–1454.
[37] Low, M. G., and Zhou, H. H. A complement to Le Cam’s theorem. Ann. Statist. 35,
3 (2007), 1146–1165.
47
[38] Meyer, Y. Wavelets and operators, vol. 37 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992. Translated from the 1990 French
original by D. H. Salinger.
[39] Nickl, R. Discussion of “Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian
credible sets”. Ann. Statist. 43, 4 (2015), 1429–1436.
[40] Nickl, R., and Szabó, B. A sharp adaptive confidence ball for self-similar functions.
Stochastic Process. Appl. 126, 12 (2016), 3913–3934.
[41] Petrone, S., Rousseau, J., and Scricciolo, C. Bayes and empirical Bayes: do
they merge? Biometrika 101, 2 (2014), 285–302.
[42] Ray, K. Bayesian inverse problems with non-conjugate priors. Electron. J. Stat. 7
(2013), 2516–2549.
[43] Ray, K. Asymptotic theory for Bayesian nonparametric procedures in inverse problems.
PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2014.
[44] Ray, K., and Schmidt-Hieber, J. The Le Cam distance between density estimation
and Gaussian white noise for small signals. ArXiv e-prints (2016).
[45] Rivoirard, V., and Rousseau, J. Bernstein-von Mises theorem for linear functionals
of the density. Ann. Statist. 40, 3 (2012), 1489–1523.
[46] Rohde, A., and Dümbgen, L. Statistical inference for the optimal approximating
model. Probab. Theory Related Fields 155, 3-4 (2013), 839–865.
[47] Szabó, B., van der Vaart, A., and van Zanten, H. Honest Bayesian confidence
sets for the L2 -norm. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 166 (2015), 36–51.
[48] Szabó, B., van der Vaart, A. W., and van Zanten, J. H. Frequentist coverage of
adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets. Ann. Statist. 43, 4 (2015), 1391–1428.
[49] Szabó, B., van der Vaart, A. W., and van Zanten, J. H. Rejoinder to discussions
of “Frequentist coverage of adaptive nonparametric Bayesian credible sets”. Ann. Statist.
43, 4 (2015), 1463–1470.
[50] van der Vaart, A. W. Asymptotic statistics, vol. 3 of Cambridge Series in Statistical
and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
48
| 10math.ST
|
11
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar
Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
H. Boyer, F. Miranville, D. Bigot, S. Guichard, I. Ingar,
A. P. Jean, A. H. Fakra, D. Calogine and T. Soubdhan
University of La Reunion,
Physics and Mathematical Engineering for Energy and Environment Laboratory,
LARGE - GéoSciences and Energy Lab., University of Antilles et de la Guyanne,
France
1. Introduction
The aim of this paper is to briefly recall heat transfer modes and explain their integration
within a software dedicated to building simulation (CODYRUN). Detailed elements of the
validation of this software are presented and two applications are finally discussed. One
concerns the modeling of a flat plate air collector and the second focuses on the modeling of
Trombe solar walls. In each case, detailed modeling of heat transfer allows precise
understanding of thermal and energetic behavior of the studied structures.
Recent decades have seen a proliferation of tools for building thermal simulation. These
applications cover a wide spectrum from very simplified steady state models to dynamic
simulation ones, including computational fluid dynamics modules (Clarke, 2001). These tools
are widely available in design offices and engineering firms. They are often used for the design
of HVAC systems and still subject to detailed research, particularly with respect to the
integration of new fields (specific insulation materials, lighting, pollutants transport, etc.).
2. General overview of heat transfer and airflow modeling in CODYRUN
software
2.1 Thermal modeling
This part is detailed in reference (Boyer, 1996). With the conventional assumptions of
isothermal air volume zones, unidirectional heat conduction and linearized exchange
coefficients, nodal analysis integrating the different heat transfer modes (conduction,
convection and radiation) achieve to establish a model for each constitutive thermal zone of
the building (one zone being a room of a group of rooms with same thermal behaviour).
For heat conduction in walls, it results from electrical analogy that the nodal method leads
to the setting up of an electrical network as shown in Fig. 1, the number of nodes depending
on the number of layers and spatial discretization scheme :
Tsi
T1
T2
T3
Tse
Fig. 1. Example of associated electrical network associated to wall conduction
228
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
The physical model of a room (or group of rooms) is then obtained by combining the
thermal models of each of the walls, windows, air volume, which constitute what
CODYRUN calls a zone. To fix ideas, the equations are of the type encountered below:
C si
C se
dTsi
dt
dTse
dt
C ai
= hci (Tai − Tsi ) + hri (Trm − Tsi ) + K (Tse − Tsi ) +
ϕswi
= hce (Tae − Tse ) + hre (Tsky − Tse ) + K (Tsi − Tse ) +
dTai
dt
Nw
∑ hci S j (Tai − Tsi ( j ) + c m (Tae − Tai )
=
ϕswe
(1)
(2)
(3)
j =1
0
=
Nw
∑ hri A j (Tsi ( j ) − Trm )
(4)
j =1
Equations of type (1) and (2) correspond to energy balance of nodes inside and outside
surfaces. Nw denote the number of walls of the room, and correspond to the following
figure:
ϕlwi
ϕswi
ϕ
ci
ϕ
lwe
ϕswe
ϕce
Fig. 2. Wall boundary conditions
ϕ being heat flux density, lw, sw, and c indices refers to long wave radiation, short wave
radiation and convective exchanges. Indices e and i are for exterior and indoor. Equation (3)
comes from the thermo-convective balance of the dry-bulb inside air temperature Tai, taking
into account an air flow m through outside (Tae) to inside. (4) represents the radiative
equilibrium for the averaged radiative node temperature, Trm. The generic approach
application implies a building grid-construction focus. Following the selective model
application logic developed (Boyer, 1999), an iterative coupling process is implemented to
manage multi-zone projects. From the first software edition, some new models were
implemented. They are in relation with the radiosity method, radiative zone coupling (short
wavelength, though window glass) or the diffuse-light reduction by close solar masks
(Lauret, 2001). Another example of CODYRUN evolution capacity could be illustrated by a
specific study using nodal reduction algorithms (Berthomieu, 2003). To resolve it, a new
implementation was done: the system was modified into a canonic form (in state space).
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
229
From a user utilization point of view, this thermal module exit is mainly linked to the
discretizated elements temperatures, the surfacic heat flows, zone specific comfort indices,
energy needs, etc.
2.2 Airflow modeling
Thermal and airflow modules are coupled to each other thanks to an iterative process, the
coupling variables being the air mass flows. It is useful to implement the inter zones flows
[i , j ] then qualifies the mass transfer from the zone
. The terms m
with the help of a matrix m
i to the zone j, as it is depicted .
Fig. 3. Interzonal airflow rates matrix
Then, a pressure model for calculating previous airflow rates is set and takes into account
wind effect and thermal buoyancy. To date, the components are integrated ventilation vents,
small openings governed by the equation of crack flow, as :
= Cd S (ΔP)n
m
(5)
S is aperture surface, Cd and n (typically 0.5- 0.67) depends on airflow regime and type of
openings and ΔP the pressure drop. Therefore, the following scheme can be applied for
encountered cases.
Outdoor
Indoor
Indoor
Indoor
Tai (j)
Tai (k)
Tae
Tai (i)
Wind
z
z
Pz(j)
Pz(i)
Fig. 4. Exterior and interior small openings
Taking into account the inside air volume incompressibility hypothesis, the mass weight
balance should be nil. Thus, in the established system, called pressure system, the
unknowns are the reference pressure for each of the zones. Mechanical ventilation is simply
taken into account through its known airflow values. In this way, ventilation inlets are not
taken into detailed consideration which could have been the case owing to their flowpressure characteristics.
230
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
⎧ i=N
i,1) + m vmc ( 1 ) = 0
⎪ ∑ m(
⎪ i =0,i ≠1
⎪ i=N
⎪
i,2) + m vmc ( 2 ) = 0
⎪ ∑ m(
⎪ i = 0,i ≠ 2
⎨
⎪
...
⎪
⎪
⎪i = N − 1
⎪
i,N) + m vmc ( N ) = 0
m(
⎪ ∑
⎩ i =0
(6)
m vmc ( k ) is the flow extracted from zone k (by vents) and N the total number of zones.
After the setting up of this non linear system, its resolution is performed using a variant of
the Newton-Raphson (under relaxed method). This airflow model has recently been
supplemented by a CO2 propagation model in buildings (Calogine, 2010).
2.3 Humidity transfers
For decoupling reasons, zones dry temperatures, as well as inter zone airflows, have been
previously calculated. At this calculation step, for a given building, each zone's specific
humidity evolution depends on the matricial equation :
Ch .r = A h .r + Bh
(7)
According to Duforestel’s model, an improvement of the hydric model (Lucas, 2003) was
given by the use of a hygroscopic buffer. If we consider N as the number of zones, a linear
system of dimension 2N is obtained and a finite difference scheme is used for numerical
solution.
3. Some elements of CODYRUN validation
3.1 Inter model comparison
A large number of comparisons on specific cases were conducted with various softwares,
whether CODYBA, TRNSYS for thermal part, with AIRNET, BUS, for airflow calculation or
even CONTAM, ECOTECT and ESP. To verify the correct numerical implementation of
models, we compared the simulation results of our software with those from other
computer codes (Soubdhan, 1999). The benchmark for inter-comparison software is the
BESTEST procedure (Judkoff, 1983), (Judkoff, 1995). This procedure has been developed
within the framework of Annex 21 Task 12 of the Solar Heating and Cooling Program (SHC)
by the International Energy Agency (IEA). This tests the software simulation of the thermal
behavior of building by simulating various buildings whose complexity grows gradually
and comparing the results with other simulation codes (ESP DOE2, SERI-RES, CLIM2000,
TRNSYS, ...). The group's collective experience has shown that when a program showed
major differences with the so-called reference programs, the underlying reason was a bug or
a faulty algorithm.
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
231
3.1.1 IEA BESTEST cases
The procedure consists of a series of buildings carefully modeled, ranging progressively
from stripped, in the worst case, to the more realistic. The results of numerical simulations,
such as energy consumed over the year, annual minimum and maximum temperatures,
peak power demand and some hourly data obtained from the referral programs, are a
tolerance interval in which the software test should be. This procedure was developed using
a number of numerical simulation programs for thermal building modeling, considered as
the state of the art in this field in the US and Europe. After correction of certain parts of
CODYRUN, an example output from this confrontation is the following concerns and
energy needs for heating over a year, for which the results of our application are clearly
appropriate.
Fig. 5. Exemple of BESTEST result
The procedure requires more than a hundred simulations and cases treated with
CODYRUN showed results compatible with most referral programs, except for a few. We
were thus allowed to reveal certain errors, such as the algorithm for calculating the
transmittance of diffuse radiation associated with double glazing and another in the
distribution of the incident radiation by the windows inside the envelope. As in the
reference codes, two points are to remember: the majority of errors came from a poor
implementation of the code and all the efficiency of the procedure BESTEST is rechecked,
errors belonging to modules that have been used for years.
Concerning airflow validation, IEA multizone airflow test cases describe several theoretical
and comparative test cases for the airflow including multizone cases. It was developed
within the International Energy Agency (IEA) programs: Solar Heating and Cooling (SHC)
Task 34 and Energy Conservation in Building and Community Systems (ECBCS) Annex 43.
The tests are designed for testing the capability of building energy simulation programs to
predict the ventilation characteristics including wind effect, buoyancy and mechanical fan.
CODYRUN passed all the test cases.
232
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
3.1.2 TN51 airflow case
In (Orme, 1999), a test case composed of a building with three storeys is described and first
published in (Tuomala, 1995). All boundary conditions are imposed (wind, external
temperature) and indoor conditions are constant, i.e. in steady state.
Fig. 6. TN 51 Test case
Next figure shows solution of 3 references codes, i.e. COMIS, CONTAM93 and BREEZE.
CODYRUN’s results were added on the figure extracted from the paper (Orme, 1999).
Fig. 7. Intermodel airflow comparison
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
233
As it can be seen, in terms of numerical results, CODYRUN gives nearly the same values as
the other codes, little differences being linked to numerical aspects as algorithms or
convergence criteria used.
3.2 Experimental confrontation
As part of measurement campaigns on dedicated cells and real homes, a set of elements of
models have been to face action (and for some improved), mostly concerning thermal and
humidity aspects. Not limited to, some of these aspects are presented in the articles (Lauret,
2001) (Lucas, 2001) and (Mara, 2001), (Mara, 2002).
4. Two applications of the software
4.1 Air solar collector
An air solar collector is used to heat air from solar irradiation. More precisely, it allows to
convert solar energy (electromagnetic form) into heat (Brownian motion). This type of
system can be used to heat buildings or to preheat air for drying systems. Air solar
collector is constituted by an absorber encapsulated into an isolated set-up (Fig. 8). To
avoid heat loss by the incoming flux side, a glass is located above the absorber, letting a
gap between them. This glass allowing to catch long wavelength emitted by the set-up
when its temperature rises-up. Air temperature improvement is mostly done by air
convection at the absorber interface. This heat is then carried by air in the building or in
the drying system.
Fig. 8. Air solar collector principle, adapted from (Sfeir, 1984)
The enclosure is not strictly speaking a building, but the generic nature of the software
allows to study this device. This is a zone (within the captation area), a glazed windows,
exterior walls and an inner wall of absorber on which it is possible to indicate that solar
radiation is incident.
It should be noted that this is part of a class simulation exercise allowing students to learn
collector physics basis.
234
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
4.1.1 Collector modeling and description of the study
It is assumed that before initial moment, there is no solar irradiation and the collector is at
thermal equilibrium, i.e. outside air temperature is the set-up temperature. At t=0, an
irradiation flux Dh is applied without interactions with the outside air temperature. In a
simplified approach, a theoretical study is easily obtained. Some equations below are used
to understand the functioning of the collector. In steady state, the incoming irradiation flux
reaching the absorber is fully converted and transmitted to the air (assumed to uniform
temperature):
ρasC asV
dTai
as (Tai - Tae )
= τ 0 Dh - K pS(Tai - Tae ) - mC
dt
(8)
Where Kp is the thermal conductance (W.m-2.K-1) of each wall through which losses can pass,
m dot is a constant air mass flow through the collector, Tai is the inside air temperature, Tae is
the outside air temperature, and ρas (1.2 kg.m-3) and Cas (1000 J.kg-1.K-1) are respectively the
air thermal conductivity and density. By knowing initial conditions (at t=0, Tai=Tae), the
solution of equation (8) appears:
Tai ( t ) = Tae +
τ 0 Dh
K
(1− e
− t K / ρ as C as V
)
(9)
The power delivered by the collector is given by
as (Tai - Tae )
Pu = mC
(10)
The studied collector is horizontal, the irradiated face has a surface of 1m², and an air gap
thickness of 0.1m. The meteorological file is constituted of a constant outside air
temperature (25°C) and a constant direct horizontal solar irradiation of 500W (between 6 am
and 7 pm). It is assumed (and further verified) that the steady state is reached at the end of
the day.
Concerning the building description file, the collector is composed by 1 zone, 3 boundaries
(1 for the upper face, 1 for the lower face, and 1 for all lateral faces), and 4 components
(glass, lateral walls, lower wall and absorber). Walls are made - from inside to outside - of
wood (1cm), polystyrene (5cm) and wood (1cm). Wood walls have a short wave absorptivity
of α = 0.3.
The glass type is a single layer ( τ 0 = 0.85), and the absorber is a metallic black sheet of 2mm
(α = 0.95).
The solar irradiation absorption model of the collector is a specific one. This has to be chosen
in CODYRUN, because traditionally in buildings the solar irradiation doesn’t impact
directly an internal wall (absorber), but the floor.
Even if this solar air heater is considered as a very simple one, the following figure gives
some details about heat exchanges in the captation area.
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
235
Fig. 9. Solar irradiation absorption process.
4.1.2 Simulation results in the case of forced convection in air gaps
An air flow of 1 m3.h-1 is set. After running simulations, the following graph is obtained for
two identical days :
Fig. 10. Evolution of air temperature at the output of the solar collector with forced
convection (1m3.h-1).
236
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
Simulation results are consistent with simplified study, but not exactly identical. In fact,
CODYRUN model is more precise than those use in eq. 8: thermal inertia of walls are taken
into account, superficial exchanges are detailed, exchange coefficients are depending on
inclination, glass transmittance is depending on solar incidence, …
With a low air flow rate of 1 m3.h-1, the collector output power is about 22W and its
efficiency about 4.5%. A solution to improve efficiency is to increase air flow rate (see
Fig. 11), in link with the fact that conductive thermal losses are decreasing when internal
temperature is decreasing.
Increase of flow rate leads to a lower air output temperature (and also to change convection
exchange coefficients). In some cases like some drying systems where a minimal air output
temperature should be needed, this can be problematic. In these cases, CODYRUN can help
to choose the best compromise between air output temperature and collector power or
efficiency.
Fig. 11. Evolution of collector outputs regarding air flow rate.
Many other simulations could be conducted, in particular in the case of natural convection.
Some of these cases could be applied to air pre-heating in case of passive building design, as
for next application.
4.2 Trombe wall modeling
4.2.1 Trombe-Michel wall presentation
A Trombe-Michel wall (often called Trombe wall), is a passive heating system invented and
patented (in 1881) by Edward Morse. It takes its name from two French people who
popularized it in 1964, one engineer and one architect, respectively Félix Trombe and
Jacques Michel.
A Trombe-Michel wall allows to store solar energy and distribute heat following simple
physical principles. This system is composed of a vertical wall, submitted to the sunshine,
which absorb and store the radiative energy as thermal energy by inertia. To improve its
absorptivity, the wall can be paint in a dark color. Stored energy rises-up the wall
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
237
temperature, inducing some heat transfer such as conduction (into the wall from outdoor to
indoor side), radiation and convection (both with in/outdoor).
To avoid outdoor losses, a glazing, which is not transmissive to ultraviolet and far infrared,
is located few centimeters in front of the wall (outdoor side). So the glazing reduces outside
losses by convection and traps wall's radiation due to its temperature (far infrared emission)
into the building. But it also slightly reduces the solar incoming flux, because some of it is
reflected or absorbed.
Nota: Considering the glazing, the sunshine insulation (etc.), it is not easy to choose the
optimal set-up configuration; this kind of situations are typical cases where CODYRUN
simulations allow to find out.
Heat transfer through the wall is done by conduction. According to the wall size and its
composition, a thermal delay appears between heat absorption and emission. This
characteristic allows to configure specifically the system in function of the needs.
Considering the thermal delay, conductive transfer-mode is convenient to heat by night, but
not by day. To palliate this lack, a faster transfer mode is brought by a variant of the
Trombe-Michel wall, called recycling wall (Fig. 12). The recycling wall is obtained by holes
addition at the top and the bottom of the wall. This variant allows to get a natural air flow,
transferring energy by sensitive enthalpy between the system side of the wall (also called
Trombe side) and the room. Indeed, as long as the glass is far enough of the wall, the
temperature difference between them induces some air-convective movement, initiating the
global air-circulation, so allowing heat distribution.
airstream
absorber
convection
window
radiation
Fig. 12. Trombe-Michell recycling wall set-up (Sfeir, 1981)
Several variants of the Trombe-Michel wall can be used. These one usually evolve in
function of the climatic need and can, for example, be defined by: the holes size and
presence (or not), the characteristics of the storage wall (e.g. thickness, density, presence of
fluid circulation or phase change materials, etc. ) or the glazing type (e.g. simple or double,
treated surface, noble gas, etc.). Some technical indications about these considerations are
given by Mazria (Mazria, 1975). Though two levels experimental design, (Zalewski, 1997)
shows that external glazing emissivity, window type and wall absorptivity mainly
characterize the system.
Trombe-Michel system (and its variants) inspired numerous publications about temperate
climate and proved their efficiency as passive heating system. By extension, there is also a
lot of studies about similar system, as solar chimney (Ong, 2003), (Awbi, 2003).
238
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
There are several values usually used to describe Trombe-Michel wall functioning:
•
Transmitted energy through the wall by conduction,
•
Transmitted energy through the holes by sensitive enthalpy,
•
The system efficiency, defined as the rate between the energy received into the room
over the total energy received by the North wall (South hemisphere) in the meantime.
•
The FGS (solar benefits fraction), defined as the rate between the benefits from the
Trombe-Michel system and the energy needed by the room without it, for a room
temperature of 22°C.
Nota: Even if the FGS refers to active heating systems, it allows to compare easily passive
heating systems between them and to other installations.
4.2.2 Presentation of Trombe-Michel wall simulations under CODYRUN
This numerical study is resolved by software simulations. The case study case presented
here takes place in Antananarivo, Madagascar (Indian Ocean). The aim of the simulations
conducted was to help this developing country to face low temperatures in classrooms
during winter season.
The word 'zone', used previously, is understood as CODYRUN vocable, correspond usually
to one room. Into the actual description, isothermal air assumption is made into the
capitation area. This consideration is taken as first approximation and can be possibly
modified later to improve the model (e.g. replaced by linear gradient hypothesis, etc.).
According to the bibliography, one of the main issues mentioned is about the convection
coefficient into the Trombe side of the wall. Because of the system successively laminar and
turbulent, convection correlation such as - Nu = f(Gr) – cannot be used. In this case,
(Zalewski, 1997) says that the laminar coefficient evolve between 2 and 2.3 W.m-2.K-1 and the
turbulent one evolve between 2.25 and 3.75 W.m-2.K-1. So, in a first approach, we
approximate the temperature-evolving value of the convection coefficient as the average of
the turbulent and laminar values (2.9 W.m-2.K-1 ).
Considering thermo-circulation, the CODYRUN's airflow module allows to calculate air
flows through wall's holes. This consideration and the case study description, the two areas
(the Trombe system and the room) are studied coupled, which is a right physical
representation of the reality. Results validity are certified by the fact that each module of
CODYRUN, and their combinations, has been validated by comparison with experimental
results, reference codes and BESTEST procedures.
This multi-model code structure (Boyer, 1996) can be efficiently exploited by studies such as
this one, where it is necessary to choose the convection coefficients by area or by wall, to
mesh slightly the walls to calculate precisely the conductive fluxes, to choose a solar gains
repartition model or equivalent sky temperature, etc.
CODYRUN also creates numerous output simulation variables, in addition to the one
related to the dry temperature area, such as sensible power outputs from mass exchange
through wall holes, conductive fluxes through the wall, enthalpic zone balance and the
PMV (Predictive Mean Vote, according to Gagge) of interior zone to quantify comfort
conditions. It is also possible to explore the conductive flux through the Trombe-Michel
wall glass.
Simulation results are presented with meteorological data of Antananarivo coming from
TRNSYS 16.0 software and its TMY2 documentation data file. According to this one, daily
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
239
sunshine insulation annual average is about 5.5 kWh.m-2. The one on the North and East
walls are respectively 2.23 and 2.67 kWh.m-2. Modified in function of the current albedo
(0.3), the previous values become 3 and 3.46 kWh.m-2.
The simulated building represents a residence unit based on a geometric cell description (9
m² parallelepiped square base ground). Moreover, materials, thermo-physics characteristics
and wall type are typical from Madagascar. The room is supposed to be constantly occupied
by two persons and have a usual profile for intern lighting. This area is supposed to
exchange air with the outside at a rate of 1 volume per hour. Finally, the system area is of 2
m2 and is located on the North wall (South hemisphere).
4.2.3 Simulation
Passive heating oriented-simulations are made the first day of July (Julian calender days 181
and following). In a first time, the objective is to explain the set-up functioning. So, some
hourly based analyses will be conducted. Finally, the last experiment will compare the same
Trombe-Michel wall with and without the recycling variant.
4.2.3.1 Inverse thermo-circulation evidence
By night, over some system specific conditions (open holes) and in function of previous day
insulations (e.g. low insulation), the flow evolution can sometime be the symmetric of the
one by day (Fig. 13). In this configuration, the system functioning is reversed, cooling the
room instead of heating it. Between points 19 and 32 (i.e. 7 pm to 8 am next day), the
Trombe-area temperature is lower than the room temperature, inducing the inverse thermocirculation. This physical process can be illustrated by the negative part of the sensitive
aeraulic benefits for the inside area.
Even if the flux values by night are low, it is important to note the following point : the
curves are obtained by assuming a sky temperature equal to the outside air temperature.
This assumption reduces the impact of the system/sky radiation transfer, so involves an
error. This error could be reduced by taking a sky temperature value more realistic, so by
considering the night-sky wide wavelength emission and the high glass emissivity (0.9). A
better approximation can be done by a sky temperature model such as Tsky=Tae– K, where
K=6.
Fig. 13. Dry temperatures and sensible power balance through holes.
4.2.3.2 Night hole closing system
Hole closing system strategy deserve a specific comment. This one can be done nicely from
flow measurement, but a simpler and passive way to do it also exists. This one consists in a
240
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
plastic foil, only attached on one side and occulting the holes preventing from inverse
thermo-circulation. Into CODYRUN, the closure system is designed by the “little opening”
component added to a hourly profile (i.e. 24 opening percentages), where the hole is closed
by night and opened by day. However, the thermo-circulation (by system inertia) continues
during the two first hours of the evening, so the profile includes this pattern too. Because of
the small gap with the previous curves (Fig. 13), the results are firstly surprising. An
explanation can be done by the small thermal gradient during the considered night.
According to Mazria (Mazria, 1975) and Bansal (Bansal, 1994), recycling variant are only
useful into cold climates (winter averages: -1 °C to -7 °C). So, simulation results show the
minor impact of the hole control in this study case. In other words, it seems that the mass
flow have a very low sensibility to the opening state. This hypothesis is rejoined by another
author (Zalewski, 1997) who have substantively the same conclusion for a North France
located case.
4.2.3.3 Global Trombe wall functioning
To obtain the full power delivered by the wall, airflow and conductive heat transfer have to
be summed. By night, it appears a constantly positive heat flux inducing a rise-up of the
room temperature (Fig. 14). In the morning (e.g. 9am first day), the global flux becomes
negative. A full curve interpretation is approached by airflow and conductive heat flux
analyze through the wall (right part of Fig. 14). Early morning, the global heat flux inversion
can be explained by highly negative conductive heat flux resulting certainly from the heat
flux night inversion (around 9 to 14, so a delay of 4 hours). Drawn curves of the incoming
heat flux through the wall confirm this hypothesis.
As foreseeable (without simulation tools), the curves show the alternate functioning of the
conductive and sensible airflow input power (the wall characteristics setting the shifting
period). By night, the conductive heat flux through the wall rises-up the room temperature,
whereas by day this action is done by the heat flux associated to air displacement, physically
expressed by the natural air movement which is a priori synchronous with the sunlight
distribution profile.
The previous report allows to ask about the holes necessity. In fact, even if there is no heat
transfer improvement, the main interest comes from the heat distribution and its timeevolving modulation into the building.
Fig. 14. Global and specific fluxes induced by the Trombe wall into the room.
To increase the room input power (i.e. the global heat flux), it could be simple to rise-up the
wall surface and/or to add some reflectors to raise the incoming sunlight intensity.
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
241
However, in every cases the system have to be simulated for summer conditions. In order to
reduce the external loss (illustrated by negative heat fluxes), a double glazing could be used,
even if it reduces the incoming sunlight intensity (transmission loss). For reference, double
glazing can be easily made from simple glazing. Another solution consists in isolating the
indoor side of the wall.
4.2.3.4 Trombe-Michel wall and recycling variant comparison
The comparison, in the meantime, of the wall's holes presence (or not), expresses a gap
between the global heat fluxes. The values corresponding to the recycling variant are shifted
to the left compared to the classic Trombe-Michel wall (Fig. 15). The input power delivered
with the holes is slightly superior, which confirms the hypothesis of low impact on section
4.2.3.2. A piece of explanation (checkable by simulation) can be given by the thermal
gradient between the room and the Trombe system, the decrease of this one reducing the
conductive transfer through the glazing.
Predicted Mean Votes (PMV) curves (of the right of Fig. 15) express the comfort sensation
which evolve between -3 and +3. By comparison, it can be affirmed that the holes improve
the comfort sensation. This improvement is related to the previous comment (about the
superior input power amount which led to a rise-up of the dry temperature), and to the
higher indoor side wall temperatures.
Fig. 15. Input power and PMV comparisons
4.2.4 Trombe wall simulation exercise conclusion
This example of CODYRUN use allows to find some interesting results about TrombeMichel wall configurations for the specific location of Antananarivo. Results such as the
interest of the recycling variant (which is almost not influenced by hole closing procedure),
the time-repartition (and impact) of the airflow and conductive heat flow on the room
temperature, (etc.) have been found. Considering the case study, much more informations
could be deduced from other well designed simulations. The considerable amount of
knowledge found was only deduced from simulations, so only following a numerical
approach. From this consideration and the results precision, a good estimation about
CODYRUN quality and level of development can be done.
5. Conclusion
This paper describes the models, validation elements and two applications of a general
software simulation of building envelopes, CODYRUN. Many studies and applications have
been conducted using this code and illustrate the benefits of this specific development.
242
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
Conducted and sustained for over fifteen years, the specific developments made around
CODYRUN led our team to be owner of a building simulation environment and develop
connex themes such as validation or application to large scale in building architectural
requirements. This evolving environment has enabled us to drive developments in
methodological areas (Mara, 2001) (modal reduction, sensitivity analysis, coupling with
genetic algorithms (Lauret, 2005), neural networks, meta models,...) or related to
technological aspects (solar masks, integration of split-system, taking into account the
radiant barriers products, ...). This approach allows a detailed understanding of the physical
phenomena involved, the use of this application in teaching and capitalization within a
work tool of a research team. Accompanied by the growth of computer capabilities, the
subject of high environmental quality in buildings, our field becomes more complex by the
integration of aspects other than those originally associated with the thermal aspects
(environmental quality, including lighting, pollutants, acoustics, ...). Simultaneously, it is
also essential to achieve a better efficiency in the transfer of knowledge and operational
tools.
6. References
Awbi H. (2003),Ventilation of buildings, Spon Press, ISBN 0415270-55-3.
Balcomb J.D. & al. (1997), Passive solar heating of buildings, in Solar Architecture,
Proceedings of the aspen Energy Forum, Ann Arbor Science Publishers Inc., Aspen,
Colorado, 1977.
Bansal N.K., Hauser G., Minke G. (1994). Passive Building design. A handbook of natural climatic
control, Elsevier, ISBN 0-444-81745-X, Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Berthomieu T., Boyer H. (2003), « Intégration de la réduction équilibrée à un code de
simulation hygro-thermo-aéraulique de bâtiments », Annales du Bâtiment et des
Travaux Publics, n°6, Sept. 2003
Bigot D., Miranville, Fakra A.H., Ingar I., Guichard S., Boyer H. (2010). Thermal
performance of photovoltaic systems integrated in buildings, In Solar Collectors and
Panels, Theory and Applications, Sciyo, ISBN 978-953-7619-X-X.
Boyer H., Chabriat J.P., Grondin Perez B., Tourrand C., Brau J. (1996) Thermal building
simulation and computer generation of nodal models, Building and Environment,
31(3), pp. 207-214.
Boyer H., Garde F., Gatina J.C., Brau J. (1998) A multi-model approach to building thermal
simulation for design and research purpose, Energy and Buildings, 28, 1, pp. 71-79
Boyer H., Lauret A.P., Adelard L., Mara T.A. (1999) Building ventilation : a pressure airflow
model computer generation and elements of validation, Energy and Buildings, 29,
pp. 283-292.
Boyer H., Bastide A., Lauret P. (2005), CODYRUN, outil de simulation et d’aide à la
conception thermo-aéraulique de bâtiments, Journée Thématique IBPSA/SFT
Outils de simulation thermo-aéraulique du bâtiment, La Rochelle, 31 mars 2005
Boyer H., Lauret A.P., Adelard L., Mara T.A. (1999). Building ventilation : a pressure airflow
model computer generation and elements of validation, Energy and Buildings, Vol.
29, 283-292, ISSN 0378-7788
Boyer H. & al. (1996), Thermal building simulation and computer generation of nodal
models, Building and Environment, Vol. 31, 207-214, ISSN 0360-1323
Heat Transfer in Buildings: Application to Solar Air Collector and Trombe Wall Design
243
Buzzoni L. & al., Energy analysis of a passive solar system, Revue Génerale de Thermique, 411416, 37, 1998
Calogine D., Boyer H., Ndoumbe S., Rivière C., Miranville F. (2010), Identification of
parameters in building concentration dispersion model, Indoor Built Environment,
Vol. 19, 2, 2010, 250-267, ISSN 1420-326X
Charbonnier S, Parant C, Pouget A. (1992), Guide le Thermique dans l’habitat neuf, bâtir
une stratégie globale, Editions du moniteur, ISBN 2-281-11132-6
Clarke J. (2001). Energy simulation in building design, Butterworth-Heinemann, ISBN 0
7506 5082 6, Glasgow (Scotland)
Duffie J.A. and Beckman W.A. (1974), Solar Energy thermal processes, ISBN 0 471 22371-9, John
Wiley & sons
Fakra A. H., Boyer H., Miranville F., Bigot D. (2010), A simple evaluation of global and
diffuse luminous efficacy for all sky conditions in tropical and humid climate.,
Renewable Energy, Vol.36, January, 298-306, ISSN 0960-1481
Garde F., Boyer H., Gatina J.C. (1999). Demand side management in tropical island
buildings. Elaboration of global quality standards for natural and low energy
cooling in buildings, Building and Environment, Vol.34, 71-84, ISSN 0360-1323
Garde F., Boyer H., Célaire R. (2001), Bringing simulation to implementation : Presentation
of a global approach in the design of passive solar buildings under humid tropical
climates, Solar Energy, Vol.71, 109-120, ISSN 0038-092X
Lauret P., Mara T. A., Boyer H., Adelard L., Garde F (2001). A validation methodology aid
for improving a thermal building model : how to account for diffuse radiation in a
tropical climate, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 33, 711-718, ISSN 0378-7788
Lucas F., Mara T., Garde F., Boyer H. (1998), A comparison between CODYRUN and
TRNSYS simulation codes for thermal building behaviour, Renewable Energy,
Vol.15, 1624-1633, ISSN 0960-1481
Lauret P., Boyer H., Rivière C., Bastide, A. (2005), A genetic algorithm applied to the
validation of building thermal models Energy and Buildings 37 (8), pp. 858-866
Mara T.A., Boyer H. and Garde F. (2002), Parametric Sensitivity Analysis of a Test Cell
Thermal Model Using Spectral Analysis, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol.
124, August, 37-242, ISSN 0199-6231
Mara T.A., Garde F., Boyer H. and Mamode M. (2001). Empirical Validation of the Thermal
Model of a Passive Solar Test Cell, Energy and Buildings, Vol.33, 2001, 589-599, ISSN
0378-7788
Mazria E, (1979) Le guide de l’énergie solaire passive, Parenthèses Editions, ISBN 2-86364-011-9
Miranville F., Boyer H., Lauret P., Lucas F. (2008), A Combined Approach for Determining
the Thermal Performance of Radiant Barriers under Field Conditions, Solar Energy,
Vol. 82, 399-410, ISSN 0038-092X
Ong K.S., A mathematical model of a solar chimney, Renewable Energy, 28, 1047-1060, 2003.
Orme M., Applicable ventilation model for air infiltration and ventilation calculations, AIVC
Technical Note 51, 1999
Raman P. & al., A passive solar system for thermal confort conditionning of building in
composite climates, Solar Energy, 70, 4, 319-329, 2001
Sfeir A.A. (1981), Guarracino G., Ingénierie des systèmes solaires, application à l’habitat,
Technique et Documentation, ISBN 2-85206-101-5
244
Evaporation, Condensation and Heat Transfer
Soubdhan T., Mara T., Boyer H., Younes A., (2000). Use of BESTEST procedure to improve a
thermal simulation software, Renewable Energy, Vol., 1800-1803, ISSN 0960-1481
Tuomala P. , Rahola J., Combined air flow and thermal simulation of buildings, Building and
Environment, .30, 2, pp.255-265 (1995)
Zalewski L. & al., Study of solar walls, validating a simulation model, Building and
Environment, 109-121, 37, 2002 Zalewski L & al., Experimental thermal study of a
solar wall composite type, Energy and Buildings, 7-8, 25, 1997.
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1507.06739v5 [math.ST] 30 Nov 2016
Selective inference with a randomized
response
Xiaoying Tian, Jonathan Taylor∗
Department of Statistics
Stanford University
Sequoia Hall
Stanford, CA 94305, USA
e-mail: [email protected]
[email protected]
Abstract: Inspired by sample splitting and the reusable holdout introduced in the field
of differential privacy, we consider selective inference with a randomized response.
We discuss two major advantages of using a randomized response for model selection.
First, the selectively valid tests are more powerful after randomized selection. Second,
it allows consistent estimation and weak convergence of selective inference procedures.
Under independent sampling, we prove a selective (or privatized) central limit theorem
that transfers procedures valid under asymptotic normality without selection to their
corresponding selective counterparts. This allows selective inference in nonparametric
settings. Finally, we propose a framework of inference after combining multiple randomized selection procedures. We focus on the classical asymptotic setting, leaving the
interesting high-dimensional asymptotic questions for future work.
AMS 2000 subject classifications: Primary 62M40; secondary 62J05.
Keywords and phrases: selective inference, nonparametric, differential privacy.
1. Introduction
Tukey (1980) promoted the use of exploratory data analysis to examine the data and
possibly formulate hypotheses for further investigation. Nowadays, many statistical
learning methods allow us to perform these exploratory data analyses, based on which
we can posit a model on the data generating distribution. Since this model is not given
a priori, classical statistical inference will not provide valid tests that control the Type-I
errors.
Selective inference seeks to address this problem, see Lee et al. (2013a), Lockhart
et al. (2014), Lee & Taylor (2014), Fithian et al. (2014). Loosely speaking, there are
two stages in selective inference. The first is the selection stage that explores the data
and formulates a plausible model for the data distribution. Then we enter the inference
stage that seeks to provide valid inference under the selected model which is proposed
after inspecting the data. Inference under different models have been studied, notably
the Gaussian families Lee et al. (2013a), Tian et al. (2015), Lee & Taylor (2014) as
well as other exponential families Fithian et al. (2014).
In this work, we consider selective inference in a general setting that include nonparametric settings. In addition, we introduced the use of randomized response in
∗ Supported
in part by NSF grant DMS 1208857 and AFOSR grant 113039.
1
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
2
model selection. A most common example of randomized model selection is probably the practice of data splitting. Assuming independent sampling, we can divide the
data into two subsets, using the first for model selection and the second subset for inference. Though not emphasized, this split is often random. Hence, data splitting can
be thought of as a special case of randomized model selection. To motivate the use of
randomized selection and introduce the inference problem that ensues, we consider the
following example.
1.1. A first example
Publication bias, (also called the “file drawer effect” by Rosenthal (1979)) is a bias introduced to scientific literature by failure to report negative or non-confirmatory results.
We formulate the problem in the simple example below.
Example 1 (File drawer problem). Let
n
X̄n =
1X
Xi,n
n i=1
be the sample mean of a sample of n iid draws from Fn in a standard triangular array.
We set µn = EFn [X1,n ] and assume EFn [(X1,n − µn )2 ] = 1.
Suppose that we are interested in discovering positive effects and would only report
the sample mean if it survives the file drawer effect, i.e.
n1/2 X̄n > 2.
(1)
Then what is the “correct” p-value to report for an observation X̄n,obs that exceeds
the threshold?
If we have Gaussian family, namely Fn = N (µn , 1), then the distribution of X̄n
surviving the file drawer effect (1) is a truncated Gaussian distribution. We also call
this distribution the selective distribution. Formally, its survival function is
1
1/2
P (t) = P X̄n > t|n X̄n > 2 , X̄n ∼ N µn ,
n
1/2
1 − Φ n (t − µn )
=
1 − Φ(2 − n1/2 µn )
where Φ is the CDF of an N (0, 1) random variable. Therefore, we get a pivotal quantity
1 − Φ n1/2 (X̄n,obs − µn )
∼ Unif(0, 1),
P (X̄n,obs ) =
1 − Φ(2 − n1/2 µn )
(2)
1
1/2
n X̄n,obs > 2, Xn,obs ∼ N µn ,
n
The pivotal quantity in (2) allows us to construct p-values or confidence intervals
for Gaussian families. When the distributions Fn ’s are not normal distributions, central limit theorem states that the sample mean X̄n is asymptotically normal when Fn
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
3
has second moments. Thus a natural question is whether the pivotal quantity in (2) is
asymptotically Unif(0, 1) when Xi,n does not come from a normal distribution?
The following lemma provides a negative answer to this question in the case when
Fn is a translated Bernoulli distribution that has a negative mean. Essentially when
the selection event n1/2 X̄n > 2 becomes a rare event with vanishing probability, the
pivotal quantity in (2) no longer converges to Unif(0, 1). We defer the proof of the
lemma to the appendix.
Lemma 1. If Xi,n takes values in {−1.5, 0.5}, with P (Xi,n = −1.5) = P (Xi,n = 0.5) =
0.5. Thus µn = −0.5. Then the pivot in (2) does not converge to Unif(0, 1)
P (X̄n ) 6→ Unif(0, 1),
for the X̄n ’s surviving the file drawer effect (1).
Randomized selection circumvents this problem. In the following, we propose a
randomized version of the “file drawer problem”.
Example 2 (File drawer problem, randomized ). We assume the same setup of a triangular array of observations Xi,n as in Example 1. But instead of reporting X̄n when it
survives the file drawer effect (1), we independently draw ω ∼ G, and only report X̄n
if
n1/2 X̄n + ω > 2.
(3)
Note that the selection event is different from that in (1) in that we randomize the
sample mean before checking whether it passes the threshold. In this case, if Fn =
N (µn , 1), the survival function of X̄n is
1
1/2
×G
P (t) = P X̄n > t|n X̄n + ω > 2 , (X̄n , ω) ∼ N µn ,
n
= P Z > n1/2 (t − µn )|Z + ω > 2 − n1/2 µn , (Z, ω) ∼ N (0, 1) × G.
(4)
To compute the exact form of P (t), we have to compute the convolution of N (0, 1)
and G which has explicit forms for many distributions G. Moreover, when G is Logistic
or Laplace distribution, we have
P (X̄n,obs ) → Unif(0, 1),
as long as Fn has centered exponential moments in a fixed neighbourhood of 0. The
convergence is in fact uniform for −∞ < µn < ∞. For details, see Lemma 10 in
Section 5.2.
The only difference between these two examples is the randomization in selection.
After selection, we need to consider the conditional distribution for inference, which
conditions on the selection event. If we denote by F∗n the distribution used for selective
inference, we have in Example 1,
1{n1/2 X̄n >2}
dF∗n
(X̄n ) =
.
dFn
PFn (n1/2 X̄n > 2)
(5)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
4
We also call the ratio between F∗n and Fn the selective likelihood ratio. In this case, the
selective likelihood ratio is simply a restriction to the X̄n ’s that survives the file drawer
effect. We observe that
√
√
nX̄n = nµn + Z, Z ∼ N (0, 1),
which leads to three scenarios for selection.
• µn > δ > 0, for some δ > 0.
√
In this case, the dominant term for selection is nµn , and since we have a big
positive effect, we would always report the sample mean X̄n when n is big. This
corresponds to the selection event having probability tending to 1 and the selective likelihood ratio goes to 1 as well. In this case, there is very little selection
bias, and the original law is a good approximation to the selective distribution
for valid inference.
• µn < −δ < 0, for some δ > 0.
√
In this case, the dominant term is also nµn , but in the negative direction. As
n → ∞, the selection probability vanishes and the selective likelihood becomes
degenerate. We almost never report the sample mean in this scenario, but in the
rare event where we do, by no means can we use the original distribution for
inference.
• −δ < n1/2 µn < δ, for some δ > 0.
This corresponds to local alternatives. In this case, the selective likelihood neither
converges to 1 or becomes degenerate. Rather, it becomes an indicator function
of a half interval. Proper adjustment is needed for valid inference in this case.
It is in the second scenario that pivotal quantity (2) will not converge to Unif(0, 1).
Different distributions will have different behaviors in the tail. Since the conditioning
event n1/2 X̄n > 2 becomes a large-deviations event, we cannot expect it to behave
like the normal distribution in the tail.
On the other hand, in Example 2, if we denote by F̃∗n the law for selective inference,
we have
Ḡ 2 − n1/2 (X̄n − µn ) − n1/2 µn
dF̃∗n
Ḡ(2 − n1/2 X̄n )
(X̄n ) =
=
dFn
EFn (Ḡ(2 − n1/2 X̄n ))
EFn Ḡ 2 − n1/2 (X̄n − µn ) − n1/2 µn
(6)
R∞
where Ḡ(t) = t G(du) is the survival function of G. When µn < −δ < 0 for some
δ > 0, and G is the Laplace or Logistic distribution so that Ḡ has an exponential tail,
the dominant term exp(n1/2 µn ) in both the numerator and the denominator will cancel
out, making the selective likelihood ratio properly behaved in this difficult scenario.
It turns out that this selective likelihood ratio is fundamental to formalizing asymptotic properties of selective inference procedures. Its behavior determines not only the
asymptotic convergence of the pivotal quantities like in (4), but also whether consistent
estimation of the population parameters is possible with large samples.
Again in the negative mean scenario where µn < −δ < 0, the sample mean X̄n
surviving the non-randomized “file drawer effect” cannot be a consistent estimator for
the underlying means µn because it will always be positive. But if X̄n is reported as in
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
5
Example 2, it will be consistent for µn even if µn is negative and bounded away from
0. For detailed discussion, see Section 3.
In general, the behavior of the selective likelihood ratio can be used to study the
asymptotic properties of selective inference procedures. We study consistent estimation
and weak convergence for selective inference procedures in Section 3 and Section 5
respectively.
We are especially inspired by the field of differential privacy (c.f. Dwork et al.
(2014) and references therein) to study the use of randomization in selective inference. Privatized algorithms purposely randomize reports from queries to a database in
order to allow valid interactive data analysis. To our understanding, our results are the
first results related to weak convergence in privatized algorithms, as most guarantees
provided in the differentially private literature are consistency guarantees. Some other
asymptotic results in selective inference have also been considered in Tibshirani et al.
(2015), Tian & Taylor (2015), though these have a slightly different flavor in that they
marginalize over choices of models.
We conclude this section with some more examples.
1.2. Linear regression
Consider the linear regression framework with response y ∈ Rn , and feature matrix
X ∈ Rn×p , with X fixed. We make a homoscedasticity assumption that Cov [y|X] =
σ 2 I, with σ 2 considered known. Of interest is
µ = E(y|X),
a functional of F = F(X) the conditional law of y given X. When F is a Gaussian
distribution, exact selective tests have been proposed for different selection procedures
Tibshirani (1996), Taylor et al. (2014), Tian et al. (2015). Removing the Gaussian distribution on F, Tian & Taylor (2015) showed that the same tests are asymptotically
valid under some conditions.
Randomized selection in this setting is a natural extension of these works. Fithian
et al. (2014) proposed to use a subset of data for model selection, which yields a significant increase in power. In this work, we study general randomized selection procedures.
Consider the following example.
Due to the sparsity of the solution of LASSO Tibshirani (1996)
1
β̂λ (y) = argmin ky − Xβk22 + λ · kβk1 ,
β∈Rp 2
a small subset of variables can be chosen for which we want to report p-values or
confidence intervals. This problem has been studied in Lee et al. (2013a). However,
instead of using the original response y to select the variables, we can independently
draw ω ∼ Q and choose the variables using y ∗ = y + ω. Specifically, we choose subset
E by solving
1
β̂λ (y, ω) = argmin ky ∗ − Xβk22 + λ · kβk1 ,
p
2
β∈R
y ∗ = y + ω,
(7)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
6
and take E = supp(β̂λ (y, ω)). In Section 4.2.2, we discuss how to carry out inference
after this selection procedure, with much increased power. We also discuss the reason
behind this increase in Section 4.2.
1.3. Nonparametric selective inference
All the previous works on selective inference assume a parametric model like the Gaussian family or the exponential family. In this work, we allow selective inference in a
non-parametric setting. Consider the following examples.
Suppose in a classification problem, we observe independent samples,
iid
(xi , yi ) ∼ F,
(xi , yi ) ∈ Rp × {0, 1}.
with fixed p. This problem is non-parametric if we do not assume any parametric structure for F and are simply interested in some population parameters of the distribution F.
In Section 5, we developed asymptotic theory to construct an asymptotically valid test
for the population parameters of interest. More details can be found in Section 5.4.1.
Also consider a multi-group problem where a response x is measured on p treatment
groups. A special case is the two-sample problem where there are two groups. It is of
interest to form a confidence interval for the effect size in the “best” treatment group.
This arises often in medical experiments where multiple treatments are performed and
we are interested to discover whether one of the treatment has a positive effect. The fact
we have chosen to report the “best” treatment effect exposes us to selection bias and
multiple testing issues Benjamini & Hochberg (1995), and therefore calls for adjustment after selection. Benjamini & Stark (1996) have considered the parametric setting
iid
where xj ∼ N (µj , σ 2 ) for each group. Suppose for robustness, it is of interest to
report the median effect size instead of the mean (assuming responses are not symmetric). Then without any assumptions on the distribution of the measurements, this also
becomes a nonparametric problem. But we can apply the theory in Section 5 to cope
with this problem, for details, see Section 5.3.
1.4. Outline of the paper
There are three main advantages of applying randomization for selective inference,
• Consistent estimation under the selective distribution
• Increase in power for selective tests
• Weak convergence of selective inference procedures
In the following sections, Section 2 gives the setup of selective inference and introduced selective likelihood ratio, which is the key for studying consistent estimation
and weak convergence of selective inference procedures. Section 4 focuses on linear
regression models with different randomization schemes, demonstrating the increase in
power. Section 5 proposes an asymptotic test for the nonparametric settings. Theorem
9 proves that the central limit theorem holds under the selective distribution with mild
conditions. Applications to the two examples in Section 1.3 are discussed. This is a
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
7
result for fixed dimension p. Finally, Section 6 discusses the possibility of extending
our work to the setting, when multiple selection procedures are performed on different
randomizations of the original data. One application is selective inference after cross
validation for the square-root LASSO Belloni et al. (2011).
2. Selective Likelihood Ratio
We first review some key concepts of selective inference. Our data D lies in some
measurable space (D, F), with unknown sampling distribution D ∼ F. Selective inference seeks a reasonable probability model M – a subset of the probability measures
on (D, F), and carry out inference in M . Central to our discussion is a selection algorithm, a set-valued map
b:D→Q
Q
(8)
where Q is loosely defined as being made up of “potentially interesting statistical questions”.
For instance, in the linear regression setting, D = Rn , our data D = y and we have
a fixed feature matrix X ∈ Rn×p . The unknown sampling distribution is F = L(y|X),
the conditional law of y given X.
b might be all linear regression modA reasonable candidate for the range of Q
els indexed by subsets of {1, . . . , p} with known or unknown variance. For any selected subset of variables E, we carry out selective inference within the model M =
{N (XE βE , σ 2 I), βE ∈ R|E| }.
Since we use the data to choose the model M , it is only fair to consider the conditional distribution for inference,
b
D|M ∈ Q(D),
D ∼ F.
Therefore, we seek to control the selective Type-I error:
b ≤α
PM,H0 (reject H0 | M ∈ Q)
(9)
b and H0 ⊂ M is the
where M is the selected family of distributions in the range of Q
null hypothesis. Selective intervals for parametric models M can then be constructed
by inverting such selective hypothesis tests, though only the one-parameter case has
really been considered to date.
2.1. Randomized selection
Randomized selection is a natural extension of the framework above. We enlarge our
probability space to include some element of randomization. Specifically, let H denote
an auxiliary probability space and Q is a probability measure on H. A randomized
selection algorithm is then simply
b∗ : D × H → Q.
Q
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
8
Note the randomization is completely under the control of the data analyst and hence
Q will be fully known. This is an extension of the non-randomized selective inference
framework in the sense that we can take Q to be the Dirac measure at 0. Many choices
b∗ are natural extensions of Q,
b which we will see in many examples.
of Q
Randomized selective inference is simply based on the law F∗ , which we also call
the selective distribution,
b∗ (D, ω), (D, ω) ∼ F × Q.
D|M ∈ Q
(10)
Note that although randomization is incorporated into selection, inference is still carried out using the original data D, after adjusting for the selection bias by considering
the conditional distribution F∗ .
Similar to the selective inference we defined above, we seek to control the selective
Type-I error,
b∗ ) ≤ α.
PF∗ (reject H0 ) = PM,H0 (reject H0 |M ∈ Q
(11)
Moreover, we also want to achieve good estimation, which makes
EF∗ ((θ̂(y) − θ(F))2 )
(12)
small.
b∗ . But
In Sections 3 to 5, we will discuss concrete examples of D, D, F and Q
before that we first introduce the selective likelihood ratio, which is a crucial quantity
in studying the selective distribution F∗ .
2.2. Selective likelihood ratio
Selective likelihood ratio provides a way of connecting the original distribution F and
its selective counterpart F∗ . It is easy to see from (10) that the selective distribution
is simply a restriction of the (D, ω)’s such that model M will be selected. Thus F∗ is
absolutely continuous with respect to F, and the selective likelihood ratio is
W(M ; D)
dF∗
(D) =
= `F (D)
∀ F ∈ M,
dF
EF (W(M ; D))
n
o
b∗ (D, ω) .
W(M ; D) = Q ω : M ∈ Q
(13)
The numerator in `F (D) is the restriction of (D, ω), integrated over the randomizations ω, and the denominator is simply a normalizing constant. One implication of the
selective likelihood ratio is that for distributions F in parametric families, their selective
counterparts may have the same parametric structure.
2.2.1. Exponential families
One commonly used parametric family is the exponential family. Assume that F = Fθ
is an exponential family with natural parameter space Θ and D = Rn and the data
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
9
D = y. Its density with respect to the reference measure dF0 is,
dFθ
(y) = exp{θT T (y) − ψ(θ)},
dF0
θ ∈ Θ.
(14)
Through the relationship in (13) we conclude, for any randomization scheme, the
law F∗M,θ is another exponential family. Formally,
Lemma 2. If Fθ belongs to the exponential family in (14), then for any randomized
b∗ , the selective distribution is also an exponential family,
selection procedure Q
dF∗M,θ
(y) ∝ W(M ; y) exp{θT T (y) − ψ(θ)},
dF0
θ ∈ Θ.
with the same sufficient statistic T (y) and natural parameters θ.
Furthermore, to test H0j : θj = 0, we consider the following law,
Tj (y) | T−j (y),
y ∼ F∗M,θ .
(15)
The first claim of the lemma is quite straight-forward using the relationship in (13).
The second claim is a Lehmann–Scheffe (c.f. Chapter 4.4 in Lehmann (1986)) construction which was proposed in Fithian et al. (2014), to construct tests for one of the
natural parameters treating the others as nuisance parameters. For detailed construction
of such tests in the linear regression setting, see Section 4.
3. Consistent Estimation After Model Selection
In this section, we leave the parametric setup and consider general models M . In particular, we study the consistency of estimators under the selective distribution for arbitrary
models. We first introduce the framework of asymptotic analysis under the selective
model. Then we state conditions for consistent estimation in Lemma 3 and conclude
with examples.
For any model M , which is a collection of distributions, we define its corresponding
selective model, which is the collection of corresponding selective distributions,
∗
∗
∗ dF
(D) = `F (D), F ∈ M ,
(16)
M = F :
dF
b∗ }. Selecwhere `F (D) is the selective likelihood ratio for the selection event {M ∈ Q
∗
tive inference is carried out under the selective model M .
In order to make meaningful asymptotic statements, we consider a sequence of ranb∗n )n≥1 and models (Mn )n≥1 with each Mn in the
domized selection procedures (Q
∗
b
range of Qn .
Often, we are interested in some population parameter θn , which can be thought be
as a functional of the distribution Fn ∈ Mn ,
θn : Mn → R.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
10
b∗ , which already incorporates the
It is worth pointing out that Mn is selected by Q
n
statistical questions we are interested in. In this sense, Mn is chosen a posteriori. The
selected model Mn∗ does not change our target of inference, it merely changes the
distribution under which such inference should be carried out. In other words, if θn is
the mean parameter, we are interested in the underlying mean of Fn , not F∗n .
We might have a good estimator θ̂n : D → R for θn (Fn ) under Fn , namely
i
h
EFn (θ̂n − θn (Fn ))2 → 0.
θ̂n is a consistent estimator if our model Mn is given a priori. But as we use data select
Mn , what really cares about is its performance under the selective distribution F∗n . Will
this estimator still be consistent under the selective distribution F∗n ?
Formally, we say an estimator θ̂n is uniformly consistent in Lp for θn (Fn ) under the
sequence (Mn )n≥1 if
lim sup sup kθ̂n − θn (Fn )kLp (Fn ) → 0.
n
Fn ∈Mn
Similarly, we say that θ̂n is uniformly consistent in probability for the functional θn (Fn )
under the sequence (Mn )n≥1 if for every > 0 there exists δ() > 0 such that for all
δ ≥ δ()
lim sup sup Fn (|θ̂n − θn (Fn )| > δ) ≤ .
n
Fn ∈Mn
The following lemma states the conditions for consistency of θ̂n under the sequence
of corresponding selective models (Mn∗ )n≥1 ,
b∗n , Mn )n≥1 of randomized selection procedures
Lemma 3. Consider a sequence (Q
and models. Suppose the selective likelihood ratios satisfies, for some p > 1,
lim sup sup k`Fn kLp (Fn ) < C.
n
(17)
Fn ∈Mn
Then for any sequence of estimators θ̂n uniformly consistent for θn (Fn ) in Lα , it is
also uniformly consistent for θn (Fn ) in Lγ under (Mn∗ )n≥1 , γ ≤ α/q, p1 + 1q = 1.
Further, if θ̂n is uniformly consistent for θn in probability, then θ̂n is uniformly
consistent for θn in probability under the sequence (Mn∗ )n≥1 .
Proof. Let ∆n = θ̂n − θn (Fn ). To prove the first assertion note that for any F∗n ∈ Mn∗
Z
k∆n kLγ (F∗n ) =
|∆n |γ `Fn (y)Fn (dy)
Dn
≤ k|∆n |γ kLq (Fn ) k`Fn (y)kLp (Fn )
= k∆n kγLγq (Fn ) k`Fn (y)kLp (Fn )
≤ k∆n kγLα (Fn ) k`Fn (y)kLp (Fn )
≤ Ck∆n kγLα (Fn )
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
11
For any δ > 0,
F∗n (|∆n |
Z
> δ) =
Dn
1{|∆n | > δ}`Fn (y)Fn (dy)
1/q
≤ [Fn (|∆n | > δ)]
k`Fn kLp (F)
1/q
≤ C [Fn (|∆n | > δ)]
.
We illustrate the application of Lemma 3 through our “file drawer effect” examples
in Section 1.1.
3.1. Revisit the “file drawer problem”
First we note that in Example 1 and 2, we observe data Dn = (X1,n , . . . , Xn,n ), with
Xi,n ∼ Fn . The randomized selection in Example 2 can be realized as
(
√
report p-values for X̄n , if nX̄n + ω > 2,
∗
b
Q (Dn , ω) =
√
do nothing,
if nX̄n + ω ≤ 2,
where we independently draw ω ∼ G.
By law of large numbers, we easily see that if we always report X̄n , it will be an
unbiased estimator for µn . However, since we only observe the sample means surviving
the file drawer effect. Will X̄n still be consistent for µn ?
In the most difficult scenario discussed in Section 1.1, where µn < −δ < 0 for some
δ > 0, X̄n cannot be a consistent estimator for µn in Example 1. This is easy to see as
Example 1 will only report positive sample means. A remarkable feature of randomized
selection is that consistent estimation of the population parameters is possible even
when the selection event has vanishing probabilities. In fact, the following lemma states
that when G is a Logistic distribution, X̄n is consistent for µn after the randomized file
drawer effect in Example 2.
Lemma 4. Suppose as in Example 2, we observe a triangular array with Xi,n ∼ Fn .
Fn has mean µn = µ < 0. If we draw ω ∼ Logistic(κ), where κ is the scale of
the Logistic distribution. Then the sample means X̄n surviving the “randomized” file
drawer effect are consistent for µ,
√
p
X̄n → µ, conditional on nX̄n + ω > 2.
if Fn has moment generating function in a neighbourhood of 0. Namely, ∃a > 0, such
that
EFn [exp (a |Xi,n − µn |)] ≤ C.
Before we prove the lemma, we want to point out that although the selection √
procedure in Example 2 is different from that in Example 1 because of randomization, nµn
is still the dominant term in selection. Note that
√
√
√
nX̄n + ω = nµn + n(X̄n − µn ) + ω.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
12
√
Since both n(X̄n − µn ) and ω are Op (1) random variables, the dominant term
√
nµn → −∞, would ensure that the selection event has vanishing probabilities in
Example 2 as well. Thus it is particularly impressive that Example 2 gives consistent
estimation where Example 1 cannot. The proof of Lemma 4 is deferred to the appendix.
We also verified this theory of consistent estimation through simulations. Figure 1
shows the empirical distributions of the sample mean X̄n after the file drawer effect
in Example 1 or the “randomized” file drawer effect in Example 2. They are marked
with “blue” colors or “red” colors respectively. We set the true underlying mean to
be µn = µ = −1 and mark it with the dotted vertical line in Figure 1. The upper
panel Figure 1a is simulated with n = 100 and the lower panel Figure 1b is simulated
with n = 250. We notice that in both simulations, the sample mean in Example 1
concentrates around the thresholding boundary, which is positive. Thus, these sample
means can not be possibly for the underlying mean µ = −1. However, the existence of
randomization allows us to report negative sample means. As a result, the sample mean
in Example 2 will be consistent for µ = −1. We see that as we increase sample size n,
the sample means concentrates closer to µ = −1.
4. Inference in linear regression models
In the linear regression setting, we assume a fixed feature matrix X ∈ Rn×p , and observe the response vector D = y ∈ Rn . We assume the noises are normally distributed.
There are two ways to parametrize a linear model, and both belong to some exponential
family. Now we introduce the selected model,
n
o
Msel (E) = N (XE βE , σ 2 I) : βE ∈ R|E| , E ⊂ {1, . . . , p}
(18)
with σ 2 known or unknown or the saturated model,
Msat = N (µ, σ 2 I) : µ ∈ Rn
(19)
with known variance. Now we consider some randomized selection procedures and
inference after selection.
4.1. Data splitting and data carving
In the introduction, we introduced data splitting Cox (1975) as a special case of randomized selective inference. In Fithian et al. (2014), the term data carving was introduced to demonstrate that data splitting is inadmissible. In data splitting (and data
carving) inference makes most sense in the selected model Msel (E), hence we should
b as returning a subset E of variables selected.
think of Q
Let us formalize this notion in our notation. Let Q be some measure on assignments
b a selection algorithm defined on datasets of any
of n data points into groups and Q
size. The distribution Q determines a randomized selective inference procedure with
b∗ , an algorithm applied to subsets of the original data set. In this
selection algorithm Q
13
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
X̄ after file drawer effect
90
80
4.0
70
3.5
60
3.0
50
2.5
40
2.0
30
1.5
20
1.0
10
0.5
0
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
X̄ after randomized file drawer effect
4.5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.0
−1.2
−1.0
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.2
0.4
(a) n = 100
X̄ after file drawer effect
120
X̄ after randomized file drawer effect
7
6
100
5
80
4
60
3
40
2
20
0
-1.2
1
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0
−1.2
−1.0
−0.8
−0.6
−0.4
−0.2
0.0
(b) n = 250
Fig 1: Empirical distributions of sample means X̄n in Example 1 and Example
2, with original or randomized file drawer effect. For the randomization, we draw
ω ∼ Logistic(κ), with κ = 0.5.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
14
case, it is easy to see that
D
W(E; y) = W(Msel (E); y) ∝
X
ω
qω · 1{Msel (E)∈Q(y
b 1 (y,ω))}
where qω is the mass assigned to assignment ω by Q. Multiple assignments or splits
considered in Meinshausen et al. (2009), Meinshausen & Bühlmann (2010) can be
formalized in a similar fashion. We can construct UMPU tests for βE in the selected
model Msel (E) by using Lemma 2, (also see Fithian et al. (2014)). We note that in
Fithian et al. (2014) the authors conditioned unnecessarily on the split ω, and we would
expect that aggregating over splits would yield a more powerful procedure.
However, there are two disadvantages with this randomization scheme. First, it is
computationally difficult to aggregate over all random splits. Second, it seems difficult
to consider the saturated model Msat for inference, which is more robust to model
misspecifications. To overcome those difficulties, we introduce other randomization
schemes below.
4.2. Additive noise and more powerful tests
Our second randomization scheme in linear regression involves additive noise. Specifically, we draw ω ∼ Q and use the randomized response y ∗ (y, ω) = y + ω for selection
In this case, we can consider both the selected model Msel,E and the saturated model
Msat . Per Lemma 2, we can perform valid inference for βE in Msel,E or linear functionals of µ in Msat .
One major advantage of using a randomized response y ∗ for selective inference is
that these procedures yield much more powerful tests, at a small cost of on the quality
of the selected models. In other words, small amount of randomization is cause a small
loss in the model selection stage, but we gain much more power in the inference stage.
The reason for increased power can be explained by a notion called leftover Fisher
Information first introduced in Fithian et al. (2014). Since selective inference is essentially inference under the selective distribution F∗n , the Fisher Information under
F∗n would determine how efficient the selective tests are. In the saturated model with
∗
Gaussian noise Msat , y−µ
σ 2 is the score statistic and its variance under Fn is exactly the
leftover Fisher Information (a similar relationship holds in the selected model Msel,E ).
Lemma 5 gives a lower bound on this leftover Fisher Information when the randomization noise Q = N (0, γ 2 I).
Lemma 5. For either Msat or Msel (E), if we use Gaussian randomization noise Q =
b ∗ ) = Q(y
b + ω), then the leftover Fisher
N (0, γ 2 ), and the selection is based on Q(y
information is bounded below by
(1 − τ )I(θ),
τ = σ 2 /(σ 2 + γ 2 ),
and I(θ) is the non-selective Fisher information for θ in Msat or Msel (E). The parameters θ depend on which of the two models we are considering.
15
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
b ∗
Proof. In the saturated model Msat , the score statistic is V = y−µ
σ 2 . Since Q(y ) is
measurable with respect to y ∗ ,
h
i
b ∗ ) ≥ Var [V | y ∗ ] = 1 Var [y | y ∗ ] .
Var V | Q(y
σ4
Since y and y ∗ = y + ω are both normal distributions with covariance matrices,
Cov [y, y ∗ ] = σ 2 I, Var [y ∗ ] = (γ 2 + σ 2 )I,
we have the leftover Fisher Information
h
i
b ∗ ) ≥ 1 Var [y | y ∗ ]
Var V | Q(y
σ4
4
1
σ
1
= 4 (σ 2 I − 2
I) = 2 (1 − τ )I = (1 − τ )I(µ).
2
σ
γ +σ
σ
In the selected model Msel,E , the score statistic is V =
T
XE
(y−XE βE )
.
σ2
Similarly,
h
i
T
b ∗ ) ≥ 1 Var XE
Var V | Q(y
y | y∗
4
σ
1
σ4
1
2
T
T
T
= 4 σ (XE XE ) − 2
(X XE ) = 2 (1 − τ )XE
XE = (1 − τ )I(βE ).
σ
γ + σ2 E
σ
When there is no randomization γ = 0, we potentially have no leftover Fisher information. This corresponds to a very rare selection event. However after randomization,
even with very extreme selection, there is always leftover Fisher information, which
makes the selective tests more powerful. Consider the following examples.
4.2.1. Revisit the “file drawer problem”
In Example 1 and Example 2, if we assume Fn = N (µ, 1), they are a special case of
the linear regression model, with the feature matrix X = 1, the all ones vector.
In this case, nX̄n is the score statistic, and its variance under the selective distribution is the Fisher information. Lemma 5 states that the leftover Fisher information is lower bounded by n(1 − τ ) if we draw randomize using Gaussian variables,
Q = N (0, γ 2 ), τ = 1/(1 + γ 2 ).
Moreover, the increase in leftover Fisher information with randomization is not specific to Gaussian randomizations. For example, in Figure 1 when we use Logistic randomization, we also observe that under the selective distribution with randomization,
X̄n has a much bigger variance than without randomization. As discussed above, this
variance multiplied by n2 is exactly the leftover Fisher information, which explains
why selective procedures after randomization will have better performances than without.
We investigate the relationship between the leftover Fisher information and the
length of confidence intervals constructed by inverting the pivot in (4). Specifically,
16
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.5
2.0
0.2
1.5
Gaussian randomization
Nominal
0.1
0.0
0.1
Observed X̄
0.2
0.3
Logistic randomization
Nominal
0.4
(a) Gaussian added noise
2.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
Observed X̄
0.2
0.3
0.4
(b) logistic added noise
Fig 2: Selective confidence intervals for different added noise
in Example 2, after observing a reported sample mean, we want to report confidence
intervals for the underlying mean µ.
Figure 2 demonstrates the selective intervals (solid lines) after (3) with ω being
either Gaussian or Logistic noises. The sample size n = 100. Unlike the nominal
confidence intervals (dashed lines), the selective intervals are valid with 90% coverage
for the underlying mean. Since Lemma 3 gives a lower bound of (1 − τ )I(µ), we
would intuitively expect the selective confidence intervals to be 1/(1 − τ ) the length
of the nominal intervals. This is verified in Figure 2a, when we observe really negative
sample means. (The sample means can be negative because we added randomization.)
On the other hand, for Logistic randomization√in Figure 2b, the intervals are slightly
wider than the nominal intervals around the 2/ n, but narrow to roughly the nominal
size on both sides of the truncation point. This indicates that added logistic noise might
preserve more information than Gaussian additive noise. Both additive noises improve
significantly over a non-randomization scheme (c.f. Figure 3 in Fithian et al. (2014)).
Of course, the increase in power and shortening of selective confidence intervals
does not come without a price. Because we select with a randomized response, we are
likely to select a worse model. But the trade-off between model quality and power is
highly in favor of randomization. See the following example.
4.2.2. Linear regression with added noise
Back to the general setup of linear regression models, we select a model by solving
LASSO with the randomized response y ∗ = y + ω and return the active set E of the
solution (as in (7)). Then per Lemma 2, we can construct valid selective tests in both
Msat and Msel (E). For instance, in Msel (E), we can construct tests for the hypothesis
H0j : βj = 0, j ∈ E based on the law,
η T y AE (y + ω) ≤ bE , PE\j y,
(y, ω) ∼ N (XE βE , σ 2 I) × Q, βj = 0,
(20)
† T
where η = (XE
) ej , ej is the j-th column of the identity matrix, PE\j is the projection
matrix onto the column space of E but orthogonal to η, and AE , bE are the appropriate
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
0.5
Type II error
0.4
17
Data splitting
Data carving
Additive noise
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
Probability of screening
0.6
0.5
Fig 3: Comparison of inference in additive noise randomization vs. data carving.
matrix and vector corresponding to LASSO selection. This is a UMPU test due to the
Lehmann–Scheffe construction (Fithian et al. 2014) and controls the selective Type-I
error (11). Although, we cannot compute the explicit forms of (20), the selection events
in (20) are polyhedrons and thus a hit-and-run or Hamiltonian Monte Carlo algorithm
Pakman & Paninski (2012) can be used for sampling.
Figure 3 compares inference in the additive Gaussian noise scheme to the data carving procedure proposed in Fithian et al. (2014) as well as data splitting. In Msel (E),
the probability of screening (i.e. selecting E including all the nonzero β’s) is a surrogate for the quality of the model. As additive noise uses a different randomization
scheme than data splitting and data carving, we vary the amount of randomization used
in each scheme and match on the probability of screening. Thus Figure 3 is like an ROC
curve for the trade-off between model quality and power of tests. The x-axis goes in
the direction of increased randomization, with the left most point corresponding to no
randomization at all. We see even with a small randomization that barely affects model
selection, we can substantially lower the Type-II error from 0.2 to less than 0.05. The
trade-off is highly in favor of (small) randomization. We see in Figure 3 that additive
noise lowers the Type-II error by almost half than data carving for the same screening
probability and they both clearly dominate data splitting. For the concrete setup of the
simulation, see Chapter 7 of Fithian et al. (2014).
5. Weak convergence and selective inference for statistical functionals
In the nonparametric setting, we assume a triangular array of data, Dn = (d1,n , . . . , dn,n ),
iid
and di,n ∼ Fn . When Fn = F, it is the special case of independent sampling. We are
interested in some functional of the distribution µn = µ(Fn ). Associated with µn is
our statistic T which is a linearizable statistic (Chung et al. 2013).
iid
Definition 6 (Linearizable statistic). Suppose di,n ∼ Fn , we call T a linearizable
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
18
statistic for µn = µ(Fn ) if for any sample size n,
n
T (Dn ) =
1X
ξi,n + R,
n i=1
p
E [ξi,n ] = µn ∈ R ,
ξi,n = ξ(di,n ),
Cov [ξi,n ] = Σn ∈ R
(21)
p×p
.
1
where ξ a function of the data and R is bounded with probability 1, R = op (n− 2 )
under F. We use the slight abuse of notations to denote ξi,n as iid random variables as
well.
Throughout this section, we assume the dimension p is fixed. We are interested in
establishing a pivotal quantity for Tn = T (Dn ) like (4) in Example 2 where Tn is the
sample mean after the randomized “file drawer effect”. It turns out we have an exact
pivotal quantity if Tn is normally distributed. To lighten notation, we suppress the script
n in the following lemma, which is a finite sample result valid for any n. We prove the
lemma in Section 7.
Lemma 7. If the statistic T is normally distributed from N (µ, Σ
n ) and the model M
b∗ (T, ω), where ω ∼ Q. Then for any contrast η,
is selected by randomized selection Q
b∗ , we have
which could depend on the outcome of selection Q
R∞
Q(t; Vη ) · exp −n(t − η T µ)2 /2ση2 dt F∗
ηT T
T
P (T ; η µ, Σ) = R ∞
∼ Unif(0, 1) (22)
Q(t; Vη ) · exp(−n(t − η T µ)2 /2ση2 ) dt
−∞
where
ση2 = η T Ση,
Q(t, Vη ) = Q
Vη =
I−
1
Σηη T
ση2
T
b∗ t · Ση/ση2 + Vη , ω
ω:M ∈Q
.
Remark 8. In selected models Msel,E , the selection is often made not only based on
(T, ω), but also other statistic of the data, which we call the null statistic N . Thus
b∗ (T, N ), ω }. To make notation
the selection event should be expressed as {M ∈ Q
simpler, we exclude such possibilities. But a slightly modified pivot where we replace
Q(t; Vη ) with Q(t; Vη , N ) in (22) and integrate over N , is still Unif(0, 1) distributed.
Note that Lemma 7 provides a valid pivotal quantity for any randomized selection
b∗ and any randomization noise Q provided that T is normally distributed.
procedure Q
In fact, Lemma 7 does not require T to be a linearizable statistic. In some sense, the
lemma is a reformulation (after rescaling) of the selective tests constructed in the linear
regression model with additive noises (see Section 4.2.2). For example, in the selected
model Msel,E , to test the hypothesis H0j : βj = 0, j ∈ E, we consider the law
(20). After introducing the null statistic N = PE⊥ y, the pivot in (22) is in fact the
CDF transform of this law, taking T = PE y, Σ = nσ 2 PE , and the selection event
b∗ ((T, N ), ω)} to be the affine selection event defined in (20). With simple
{M ∈ Q
−2
calculation, it is easy to see Vη = (PE − kηk η T η)y = PE\η y, which we condition
on in both (22) and (20).
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
19
Of course the pivot in (22) is very difficult to compute explicitly, and we need to
use sampling schemes like in (20). But in a nutshell, P (T ; η T µ, Σ) is simply a CDF
transform of the law
Σ
T
∗
b
η T | Vη , M ∈ Q (T, ω), (T, ω) ∼ N µ,
× Q.
(23)
n
After introducing the null statistic, Lemma 7 is agnostic to the selected model Msel,E ,
where µ = XE βE or the saturated model Msat , where the parameter is simply µ.
The nuances between the two models in terms of sampling is that the saturated model
condition on N (treating it as part of Vη ), but selected model integrate over N .
Lemma 7 is written with T implicitly being the approximate average of n i.i.d variables, hence the distribution N (µ, Σ
n ). Linearizable statistics are of particular interest as
they converge to N (µ, Σ
)
due
to
central
limit theorem. In the following, we seek to esn
tablish conditions under which the pivot P (T ; µ, Σ) will be asymptotically Unif(0, 1).
5.1. Selective central limit theorem
In other work on asymptotics of selective inference Tian & Taylor (2015), Tibshirani
et al. (2015), the setup considered is usually the saturated model Msat . These works
b∗ . In
considered asymptotics of selective inference marginalized over the range of Q
contrast, we consider the convergence for any particular selected model Mn , under
b∗n }. Specifically, we allow weak
the conditional law of the selection event {Mn ∈ Q
convergence of the pivot in (22) in the sequence of selected models (Mn )n≥1 . As explained above, selected models integrate over the null statistics while saturated models
condition on those, thus the selective tests should have more power provided that the
selected model is believable. In the saturated model, our result provides a finer measure
of convergence than in Tian & Taylor (2015). On the other hand, Tian & Taylor (2015)
allows high-dimensional setting in some cases while we consider fixed dimension p.
Similar to the asymptotic setting in Section 3, we consider the convergence of
P (Tn ; η T µn , Σn ) under a sequence of models (Mn )n≥1 selected by a sequence of
b∗n )n≥1 . (Tn )n≥1 is a sequence of linearizable statistics defined
selection procedures (Q
in Definition 6, with asymptotic mean µn and asymptotic covariance matrix Σnn .
It turns out that in this setting, the selective likelihood ratio `Fn again plays an important role in the convergence of the pivot. Recall that with randomized selection
b∗ (Tn , ω), the selective likelihood is
Q
W(Tn ; Mn )
,
EFn [W(Tn ; Mn )]
n
o
b∗ (Tn , ω)
W(Tn ; Mn ) = Q ω : Mn ∈ Q
n
`Fn (Tn ; Mn ) =
(24)
It will
√ be convenient to rewrite the likelihood ratio in terms of the normalized vector
Zn = n(Tn − µn )
`¯Fn (Zn ) = `F (n−1/2 Zn + µn ).
(25)
as well as the pivot (22)
P̄Fn (Zn ) = P (n−1/2 Zn + µn ; ηnT µn , Σn ).
(26)
20
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
Our approach is basically a comparison of how the pivot will behave under Fn and
its Gaussian counterpart Φn = N (µ(Fn ), Σ(Fn )). Specifically, it is a modification
of the proof of Theorem 1.1 of Chatterjee (2005), modified to allow for the fact the
derivatives of the pivot and the likelihood are not required to be uniformly bounded.
Given a norm Ω on Rp , define
n
o
r/k
λΩ
∂ k f (s)
exp(−rΩ(s)) : 1 ≤ k ≤ r ,
(27)
r (f ) = sup
s∈Rp
where ∂ k denotes the k-fold differentiation with respect to the p-dimensional vector s,
k · k denotes element wise maximum.
Now we state our selective central limit theorem, which we prove in Section 7.
Theorem 9 (Selective central limit theorem). Suppose the statistics Tn = T (Dn ) are
linearizable statistics according to Definition 6. We also assume the norms Ω : Rp → R
are such that for each f ∈ {P̄n , `¯Fn , `¯Φn }, it satisfies
sup λΩ
3 (f ) ≤ C1 .
(28)
Fn ∈Mn
Moreover, assume ξi,n has uniformly bounded moment generating function in some
neighbourhood of 0. Namely, ∃a > 0, such that
sup sup EFn (exp(akξi,n − µ(Fn )k1 )) ≤ C2 .
(29)
n≥1 Fn ∈Mn
Furthermore, we assume
lim sup n1/2 ·
n
b∗n ]
b∗n ] − P(Φ ×Q) [Mn ∈ Q
P(Fn ×Q) [Mn ∈ Q
n
≤ C3 .
b∗ ]
P(Φ ×Q) [Mn ∈ Q
n
(30)
n
Then, for any g with uniformly bounded derivatives up to third order
EF∗n g P (Tn ) −
Z
0
1
g(x)dx ≤ n−1/2 K(g, C1 , C2 , C3 , p),
n ≥ n0
(31)
where K depends only on the bounds on the derivatives of g, the constants C1 , C2 , C3
and the dimension p. Thus the convergence is uniform in (Mn )n≥1 for models satisfying
(28), (29) and (30).
Theorem 9 provides a finite sample bound on the convergence of the pivot P (Tn ).
Since we allow g to be functions with uniformly bounded derivatives up to the third
order, (31) implies convergence of P (Tn ) to Unif(0, 1) under F∗n . In the following
examples, we show how to verify conditions (28), (29) and (30).
5.2. Revisit the “file drawer problem”
In Examples 1 and 2, we considered only reporting an interval or a p-value about µn
when n1/2 X̄n > 2 or n1/2 X̄n + ω > 2. This is an example where we do not really
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
21
select a model, but rather select only a proportion of the data to report. The selective
distribution simply refers to the law of the reported sample means, which pass the
threshold.
The data we observe is Dn = (X1,n,...,Xn,n ) with the linearizable statistic Tn simply being the sample mean X̄n . Example 1 corresponds to the degenerate randomization of adding 0 to X̄n . Work of Tian & Taylor (2015) show that in order for the
corresponding pivot to converge weakly we can take, for ∆ < 0 fixed
n
o
3
Mn = F : EF [X̄n ] > n−1/2 ∆, EF [Xi,n
]<∞ .
(32)
That is, X̄n will satisfy a selective CLT when the population mean is not too negative.
On the other hand, in Example 2, the pivot in (22) is of the form,
R∞
√
2
Ḡ(2 − nt)e−n(t−µn ) /2 dz
X̄n
,
(33)
P (X̄n ) = R ∞
√
Ḡ(2 − nt)e−n(t−µn )2 /2 dz
−∞
and likelihood `Fn (X̄n ) is defined in (6).
When G is the Logistic noise, then condition (28) and (30) can be verified. Formally,
we have the following lemma whose proof we defer to the appendix,
Lemma 10. If G = Logistic(κ), with κ being the scale parameter, then if centered
Xi,n ’s have moment generating functions in the neighbourhood of zero, then the pivot
P (X̄n ) is asymptotically Unif(0, 1).
In other words, with Logistic randomization noise, we can take the sequence of
models to be
Mn = Fn : EFn exp a |X1,n − µn | < ∞ , for some a > 0.
(34)
Requiring exponential moments is stricter than the third moment condition in (32), but
we would have a stronger conclusion, namely weak convergence uniformly over all
µn ’s.
5.3. Two-sample median problem
In the two-sample median problem, we have two treatment groups from which we take
iid
iid
measurements, x1i ∼ F1 and x2i ∼ F2 ; for simplicity of notation, we assume we
observe n samples from each group, and drop n in the subscript. We will report the
bigger median from this group in the non-randomized setting. Exact formulation of
randomized selection will be discussed below.
Suppose our underlying distribution is F = F1 ×F2 . Let µ = (µ1 , µ2 ) is the population median of the two groups, and T = (T1 , T2 ) is the sample median. The well-known
result by Bahadur (1966) states that the sample median is a linearizable statistic for the
median when the CDF of the distribution F has positive density f , and f 0 is bounded
iid
in a neighbourhood of the population median m. Formally, if xi ∼ F , then the sample
median
n
1 X 1{xi > m} − 1/2
+ Rn ,
(35)
T (x1 , . . . , xn ) = m +
n i=1
F 0 (m)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
22
with R = O(n−3/4 log n) with probability 1.
b∗ reports
Our (randomized) selection algorithm Q
(
P (T ; µ1 , Σ), if T1 > T2 + n−1/2 ω
P (T ; µ2 , Σ), if T1 ≤ T2 + n−1/2 ω,
where ω ∼ Q and Σ = diag( 41 f1 (µ1 )−2 , 14 f2 (µ2 )−2 ) is a diagonal matrix. f1 , f2 are
the densities of F1 and F2 . Without loss of generality, we suppose M1 is selected, i.e.
the first group is the “best” group.
We choose the randomization noise Q to be a Logistic(κ) with mean 0 and κ is the
scale, and let Gκ be the CDF. The resulting pivot for µ1 is
R∞
√
√
Gκ ( nt − nT2 ) · exp(−n(t − µ1 )2 /2σ12 ) dt
1
T1
, σ12 =
.
P (T ; µ1 , Σ) = R ∞
√
√
2
2
4f1 (µ1 )2
G ( nt − nT2 ) · exp(−n(t − µ1 ) /2σ1 ) dt
−∞ κ
This pivot strikes a similarity with
√ the pivot in (33) for Example 2 with the truncation
threshold 2 being replaced by nT2 and plugging in the appropriate means and variances of the medians. A result similar to Lemma 10 can be established, which ensures
convergence of the pivot uniformly for any underlying medians (µ1 , µ2 ).
In order to construct the above pivot, we need knowledge of the variance σ12 . Without
selection, there are natural estimates of this variance. One may ask, how will inference
be affected if we plug this estimate into our pivot? We revisit this question in Section
5.5.
5.4. Affine selection events
In this section, we discuss the special case of affine selection events (regions). This
combined with the asymptotic result in Theorem 9 applies to more general settings. In
particular, it allows us to approximate non-affine regions. For a concrete example, see
Section 5.4.1.
We drop the subscript n where possible to simplify notations. Suppose for our model
b∗ } can be deM , the selection is based on (T, ω), and the selection event {M ∈ Q
scribed as
√
{ nAM T + ω ∈ KM },
where the affine matrix AM ∈ Rd×p and KM is a region in Rd . Many examples of nonrandomized selective inference can be expressed in this way (c.f. Lee et al. (2013b),
Taylor et al. (2014), Lee & Taylor (2014), Fithian et al. (2015)). In this section, we
provide conditions under which Theorem
√9 can be applied.
We again normalize T to be Z = n(T − µ), then the selection event can be
rewritten as
{AM (Z + ∆) + ω ∈ KM },
(36)
√
where nµ = ∆, Z converges to N (0, Σ).
Suppose ω ∼ Q, which has distribution function G. Then we introduce some conditions on the selection region KM and the added noise distribution G,
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
23
Lower bound: We assume there is some norm h, such that
Z
G(dw) ≥ C − exp − inf h(w) , ∀θ ∈ Rd .
w∈KM −θ
KM −θ
Smoothness: Suppose G has density g, we assume the first 3 derivatives of g are
integrable,
Z
k∂ j g(w)kdw ≤ Cj , j = 0, 1, 2, 3
Rd
where the norm on the left-hand side is the maximum element-wise of the partial
derivatives.
The above two conditions essentially require G to be differentiable and have heavier tails than (or equal to) exponential tails. In fact we prove that the lower bound and
smoothness conditions ensure that (28) are satisfied under the local alternatives introduced below.
Definition 11 (Local alternatives). For the sequence of selected model (Mn )n≥1 , we
define the local alternatives of radius of B to be the set all sequences (µn )n≥1 , such
that
√
dh (0, KMn − AMn ∆) ≤ B, ∆ = nµn
where dh (·, ·) is the distance induced by the norm h.
The notion of local alternatives is natural in the asymptotic setting as we expect even
a small effect size will be more prominent when we collect more and more data.
Formally, we have the following lemma, whose proof is deferred to the appendix.
Lemma 12. Suppose G, KM satisfy the lower bound and smoothness conditions, then
condition (28) are satisfied under the local alternatives.
Now, we are left to verify conditions (29) and (30). Condition (29) is essentially
a moment condition on the centered statistics ξi,n − µn , which we have to assume.
Condition (30) can be verified using the well known results in multivariate CLT (see
Gotze (1991)). To be rigorous, we state the following lemma, which we also prove in
the appendix.
Lemma 13. If Fn is such that the centered statistics ξi,n −µn have finite third moments,
then under the local alternatives, condition (30) is satisfied.
To summarize, Lemma 12 and Lemma 13 state that if G has integrable derivatives
and exponential tails, then the pivot in (22) converges to Unif(0, 1) uniformly for F∗n
so long as Fn ’s are such that ξi,n − µn have exponential moments in a neighbourhood
of 0.
Unlike the sample mean and sample median examples, the pivot is difficult to compute explicitly in this case. However, as we discuss in the beginning of Section 5, the
pivot is essentially the CDF transform of the conditional law (23), which we can sample
from. As discussed above, we can just take ω to be from a Logistic distribution.
Now we apply the above theory to logistic regression.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
24
5.4.1. Example: randomized logistic lasso
iid
Suppose we observe independent samples, di = (yi , xi ) ∼ F, where yi ’s are binary
observations and xi ∈ Rp . The ordinary logistic regression solves the following problem,
β̄ = argminβ∈Rp `(β)
" n
#
X
= argminβ∈Rp −
yi log π(xi β) + (1 − yi ) log(1 − π(xi β)) ,
(37)
i=1
where π(x) = exp(x)/(1 + exp(x)). This is a nonparametric setting as we do not
assume any parametric structure for F.
The randomized logistic lasso adds an `1 penalty, a randomization term and a small
quadratic term,
1
1
β̂ = argminβ∈Rp √ `(β) + ω T β + kΛβk1 + √ kβk22 ,
n
2 n
(38)
iid
where ωj ∼ Logistic(κ) is the perturbation to the gradient and Λ is a diagonal matrix
which introduces (possibly) unequal feature weights, κ controls the amount of randomization added. The addition of the quadratic term ensures that (38) is strictly convex,
thus has a unique solution. A similar formulation for linear regression has been proposed in Meinshausen & Bühlmann (2010).
Selective inference in this setting has not been considered before. Without the Gaussian assumptions Lee et al. (2013a) does not apply. The parametric setting of this problem has been discussed in Fithian et al. (2014), but computation of the selective tests
are mostly infeasible for general X. Finally, the asymptotic result by Tian & Taylor
(2015) does not apply here as the framework require exactly affine selection regions,
which is not the case in this setting.
Suppose the solution to (38) has nonzero entry set E, then our target of inference
∗
βE
, the unique population minimizer which satisfies
T
∗
EF [XE
(y − π(XE βE
))] = 0.
(39)
∗
)) with independently samNote that a parametric model yi |xi ∼ Bernoulli(π(xi,E βE
∗
pled xi ’s will have βE
satisfying (39). But we by no means assume such an underlying
∗
distribution. Rather, for any well-behaved distribution F, βE
can be thought of of a
statistical functional of the underlying distribution F, depending on the outcome of
selection E.
Selective inference in this setting is carried out conditioned on (E, sE ), the active
set and its signs. We first introduce the following notations,
exp(XE βE )
, WE (βE ) = diag(πE (βE )(1 − πE (βE ))),
1 + exp(XE βE )
1 T
1 T
QE (βE ) = XE
WE (βE )XE , CE (βE ) = X−E
WE (βE )XE ,
n
n
DE (βE ) = CE (βE )Q−1
E (βE )
πE (βE ) =
25
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
where X is the feature matrix, and XE , X−E is the columns corresponding to the
active set and inactive set respectively. By law of large numbers, we have
p
def
∗
∗
QE (βE
) → EF QE (βE
) = Q,
p
def
p
def
∗
∗
CE (βE
) → EF CE (βE
) = C,
∗
DE (βE
) → CQ−1 = D.
(40)
Now we introduce our linearizable statistics and show that the conditioning event
(E, sE ) can be expressed as affine regions of these statistics.
Lemma 14. Suppose E is the active set of the solution of (38), and we denote
" n
#
X
β̄E = argmin −
yi log π(xi,E βE ) + (1 − yi ) log(1 − π(xi,E βE ))
βE ∈RE
i=1
as the unpenalized MLE restricted to the selected variables E.
∗
The following statistic T is linearizable with asymptotic mean (βE
, ρ) and variance
Σ/n,
β̄E
+ R,
T = 1 T
n X−E y − πE (β̄E )
∗
)) . Morewhere R = op (n−1/2 ) is a small residual, and ρ = E xTi,−E (yi − π(xi,E βE
over,
√ the selection event {Ê, zÊ = (E, sE )} can be characterized as the affine region
{ nAM T + BM ω ≤ bM }, where
−SE
0
SE Q−1
0
−SE Q−1 ΛE sE
I−E , BM = D
−I−E , bM = λ−E − DΛE sE ,
AM = 0
0
−I−E
−D
I−E
λ−E + DΛE sE
where I−E denotes the identity matrix of n − |E| dimensions and ΛE , Λ−E denote the
active block and the inactive block of Λ respectively and λ is the diagonal elements of
Λ, SE = diag(sE ).
The proof of this lemma is also deferred to the appendix.
Thus using Lemma 12 and Lemma 13, we can conclude under local alternatives, the
pivot (22) converges to Unif(0, 1). To test H0j : βj∗ = 0, we take η = ej , and sample
∗
√
Σ
βE
η T T | Vη , nAM T + BM ω ≤ bM , (T, ω) ∼ N
,
× G,
ρ
n
∗
where ρ = E xTi,−E (yi − π(xi,E βE
)) . Since ρ is the nuisance parameters for testing
H0j , j ∈ E, the conditional law above will not depend on its value. A hit-and-run
algorithm for sampling this law can be implemented. Moreover, recent development
by Tian et al. (2016), Harris et al. (2016) propose more general and efficient sampling
schemes for this law. For details, see for example Chapter 3.2 Tian et al. (2016) where
the sampling scheme for this very example is considered and simulation results are
provided.
In Lemma 14, we assume the covariance matrix Σ is known. In applications, we can
bootstrap it. But is it valid to plug in the bootstrap estimate of Σ?
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
26
5.5. Plugging in variance estimates
In Section 5.3 we derived quantities that were asymptotically pivotal for the best median, up to an unknown variance. In the sample median case, by (35), the variance of
the sample median is approximately [4nf (m)2 ]−1 , where f (m) is the PDF evaluated
at the median m. A simple consistent estimator for f (m) is to take 1/2 ± √1n quantiles
an and bn , then
2
f (m) ≈ √
(41)
n(bn − an )
is consistent for f (m) based on which we get a consistent estimator for σ12 .
More generally, computing the pivot (22) requires knowledge of Σ. In practice, we
usually do not have prior knowledge of the variance Σ and need a consistent estimate
for Σ. We might use a bootstrap or jackknife estimator. When p is fixed, the bootstrap
estimator is consistent and thus we get a consistent estimator Σ̂. Lemma 3 states that
under moment conditions on the likelihood, Σ̂ will be consistent for Σ under F∗n as
well, justifying the plug-in estimator of Σ.
Figure 4 is some simulation results for the two-sample medians problem. In each
case, we take the sample size for each treatment group to be 500, and generate the
noise from a skewed distribution N (0, 1) + 0.5Exp(1). We standardize it such that
the noise has median 0 under the null hypothesis. We use additive logistic noise with
scale κ = 0.8 for randomization. The better group is decided using the randomized
sample median, and selective inference is carried out. In Figure 4a, the pivot with plugin
variance estimate σ
b in (41) is plotted under both the null hypothesis H0 : µbetter = 0
and the HA : µbetter > √1n . The pivot has reasonable power even for identifying local
alternatives. The pivot is almost exactly Unif(0, 1) under the null hypothesis with the
sample size n = 500. In fact, it is very close at a relatively small sample size n = 50
justifying the application of asymptotics in the nonparametric setting. Figure 4b further
illustrates the difference in the unselective v.s. selective distribution and its convergence
to its theoretical limit. We see that there is a clear shift in selective distribution that
calls for adjustment for the selection. For sample size n = 500, the empirical selective
distribution converges to our theoretical distribution.
6. Multiple Randomizations of the Data
Most of the examples above focus on a single randomization ω on the data, which we
use for model selection. We naturally want to extend it to multiple randomizations, and
multiple randomized selections, which will collectively suggest a model for inference.
In this section, we allow multiple randomizations in a possibly sequential fashion and
discuss how inference can be carried out.
27
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
1.0
ECDF for the pvalues, two-sample median, n=500
null
alternative
Better median histogram, n=500
selected pdf
median, unselected
median, selected
6
5
0.8
4
0.6
3
0.4
2
0.2
0.0
0.0
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0
0.3
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
median values
0.3
0.4
0.5
(a) Null and alternative pivot for the “bet- (b) Selective v.s. unselective distribution,
ter” median
and theoretical PDF
Fig 4: Asymptotic distribution of the median for the selected group
6.1. Selective inference after cross-validation
Consider the case where we first choose a regularization parameter by cross-validation,
and then fit the square-root LASSO problem Belloni et al. (2011) at this parameter,
β̂λ (y; X) = argmin ky − Xβk2 + λkβ|1 ,
(42)
β
where λ is picked from a fixed grid Λ = [λ1 , . . . , λk ]. The discussion below is not
specific to selection by square-root LASSO.
The model selected by cross-validated square-root LASSO involves two steps of
selection. We denote by yCV the response for selecting the randomization parameter,
and yselect the response vector for fitting the square-root LASSO at the selected regularization parameter λ. Both vectors are randomized version of the original vector y.
Inference after cross validation requires combining two steps of randomized selection.
Consider the following procedure.
First, we randomize y to get the vector yCV and yselect
∼ N (y, σ12 I)
yinter |y, X
yCV |yinter , y, X
yselect |yinter , y, X
∼
2
∼ N (yinter , σ2,CV
I)
(43)
2
N (yinter , σ2,select
I).
Note the intermediate vector yinter is introduced convenience of sampling. The above is
just one of the plausible randomization schemes.
After having randomized, we select λ with K-fold cross-validation using yCV :
λ̂ = λ̂(yCV , X) = argminλ∈Λ CVK (yCV , X, λ)
(44)
where CVK (y, X, λ) is the usual K-fold cross-validation score with coefficients estimated by the square-root LASSO. Alternatively, one could compute the cross-validation
score using the OLS estimators of the selected variables. Note that we have left implicit
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
28
the randomization that splits observations into groups. That is λ̂ in (44) above is a function of (yCV , X, ω) where ω is a random partition of {1, . . . , n} into K groups. When
we sample yCV below, we redraw ω each time.
The subset of variables and signs is selected using the square-root LASSO with
response yselect :
n
o
Ê(yCV , yselect , X) = j : β̂λ̂(yCV ,X),j 6= 0 ,
(45)
zÊ (yCV , yselect , X) = sign(β̂λ̂(yCV ,X) ).
After seeing the selected variables Ê, we perform inference in the selected model
Msel (Ê). Since Msel (Ê), we will still have an exponential family after selection. Per
Lemma 2, we sample from the following law,
L XjT y λ̂(yCV , X) = λ, (Ê, zÊ ) = (E, zE ), PE\j y .
The additional conditioning on the signs are for computational reasons. In fact, recent
development in Harris et al. (2016) proposes sampling schemes that overcome these
difficulties, so that we do not need to condition on this additional information.
To sample from the above law, we use a Gibbs-type sampler, which iterate over y,
yinter , yCV and yselect , conditional on the other three and the selection event. It includes
the following steps.
Sampling yCV Using the conditional independence of yCV and yselect given yinter , we
have
n
o
2
L yCV yinter , yselect , y, λ̂(yCV , X) = λ = N (yinter , σ2,CV
I) λ̂(yCV , X) = λ .
This is the computational bottleneck, as we do not have good description for
the selection event for cross validation. A brute-force sampling scheme will be
computationally expensive, as we need to refit the model over a grid of λ’s. Thus,
we do not update yCV too often.
Sampling yselect The conditional independence of yselect and yCV given yinter implies,
L yselect yinter , yCV , y, (Ê, zÊ )(yCV , yselect , X) = (E, zE ), λ̂(yCV , X) = λ
n
o
2
= N (yinter , σ2,select
I) | (Êλ , zÊ,λ )(yselect , X) = (E, zE )
Tian et al. (2015) has given an explicit description of the selection event
{Êλ , zÊ,λ = (E, zE )}.
Thus hit-and-run sampling provides a tractable sampling scheme.
Sampling yinter This is a simple step. Because the selection event is based on yCV and
yselect , we have
L yinter y, yselect , yCV
!−1
1
y + σ21 yCV + σ2 1 yselect
σ12
1
1
1
2,CV
2,select
.
,
+ 2
+ 2
=N
1
1
1
σ12
σ2,CV
σ2,select
+
+
2
2
σ
σ
σ2
1
2,CV
2,select
29
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
Sampling y This is also simple with our randomization scheme. Note that y is conditionally independent of yselect and yCV given yinter ,
1
1
1
σ 2 XE βE + σ12 yinter
,
1
1
2
σ
+
2
2
σ
σ1
L y yinter , yCV , yselect = L y yinter = N
1
+ 2
σ1
−1 !
Since we condition on PE\j y, we essentially take y and project out the update
on the space orthogonal to that of Xj .
A chain that iterates through the above four steps will give us samples from the
desired distribution for inference.
6.2. Collaborative selective inference
One of the motivations of the reusable holdout described in Dwork et al. (2014) is that
it allows a data analyst to repeatedly query a database yet still be able to approximately
estimate expectations even after asking many questions about the data. Another version
of this model may be that several groups wish to model the same data and then, as a
consortium, decide on a final model and be able to approximately estimate expectations
in this final model. We might call this collaborative selective inference.
Formally, suppose each of L groups has its own preferred method of model selecbl )1≤l≤L . We assume there is a central “data”
tion, encoded as selection procedures (Q
bank that decides what “data” each group is allowed to see. We express this is as
a sequence of randomization schemes (yl∗ )1≤l≤L . Formally, this is equivalent to enlarging the probability space to D × B with measure F × B and fixing a function
y ∗ (y, ω) = (y1∗ (y, ω), . . . , yl∗ (y, ω)). It may be desirable to choose the law of y ∗ |y so
that the coordinates are conditionally independent given y, though it is not necessary.
bl (y ∗ ) ∈ σ(y ∗ ) and convene
Now suppose that the L groups choose models M̂l∗ = Q
l
l
to discuss what the best model is M . For every choice of L models (M1 , . . . , ML )
and final model M , the following selective distribution can be used for valid selective
inference
b ∗
dF∗
B(ω : ∩L
l=1 Ql (yl (y, ω)) = Ml )
(y) =
.
(46)
b ∗ = Ml )
dF
(F × B)(∩L Q
l=1
l
When the yl∗ ’s are conditionally independent given y then it is clear that
b ∗
B(∩L
l=1 Ql (y (y, ω)) = Ml ) =
L
Y
l=1
bl (y ∗ (y, ω)) = Ml ).
B(Q
l
It is possible that the consortium has beforehand decided on an algorithm that will
choose a best model automatically, determined by some function S(M1 , . . . , ML ). In
this case, one should use the selective distribution
dF∗
B(ω : S(M1∗ (y, ω), . . . , ML∗ (y, ω)) = M )
(y) =
dF
(F × B)(S(M1∗ , . . . , ML∗ ) = M )
(47)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
30
When the models in question are parametric, perhaps Gaussian distributions, and the
randomization is additive Gaussian noise the central data bank can explicitly lower
bound the leftover information by
∗
Var(y|y1∗ , . . . , yL
).
This quantity is expressible in terms of the marginal variance of y and the central
data bank’s noise generating distribution for y ∗ (y, ω) = (y + ω1 , . . . , y + ωL ). By
maintaining a lower bound on the above quantity, the central data bank can maintain
a minimum prescribed information in the data for final estimation and/or inference. In
a sequential setting, where valid inference is desired at each step, maintaining a lower
bound may involve releasing noisier and noisier versions of y. Sampling under this
scheme seems quite difficult, and we leave it as an area of interesting future research.
7. Proof
7.1. Proof of Theorem 9
To prove Theorem 9, we first prove the following lemma, which might be of independent interest.
Lemma 15.√Suppose Tn is a linearizable statistic for µn = µ(Fn ) as defined in (21).
Let Zn = n(Tn − µn ) ∈ Rp and a function f : Rp → R with finite λΩ
3 (f ) for
some norm Ω on Rp . Moreover, if Fn has finite centered exponential moments in a
neighbourhood of zero. Then
1
−2
|EFn [f (Zn )] − EΦn [f (Zn )] | ≤ C(p)λΩ
,
3 (f )n
n ≥ n0
for some n0 ≥ 1, where C(p) is a constant only dependent on the dimension.
Lemma 15 can be seen as an extension of the result by Chatterjee (2005) in the sense
that the author in Chatterjee (2005) established result for the case Ω = 0. The proof is
also an adaptation of the technique in Chatterjee (2005).
Pn
Proof. Without loss of generality, we assume Tn = n1 i=1 ξi,n and the residual is 0.
First, we define the normalizing operator. For any S ∈ Rn×p ,
n
1 X
N (S) = √
S[i] ∈ Rp ,
n i=1
where S[i] is the i-th row of S.
We also define for any n and 0 ≤ k ≤ n,
0
0
ξ1,n − µ(Fn ),
ξ1,n − µ(Fn ),
..
..
.,
.,
0
0
ξk−1,n − µ(Fn ),
ξ
−
µ(F
),
n
k−1,n
0
−
Sn,k = ξk,n − µ(Fn ), Sn,k =
0
ξk+1,n − µ(Fn ),
ξk+1,n − µ(Fn ),
..
..
.,
.,
ξn,n − µ(Fn )
ξn,n − µ(Fn )
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
iid
31
iid
0
where ξi,n ∼ Fn with mean µ(Fn ) and variance Σ(Fn ) and ξi,n
∼ N (µ(Fn ), Σ(Fn )).
−
−
Let Fn,k . Fn,k denote the distribution of Sn,k and Sn,k ’s respectively. Note Fn,k and
−
Fn,k
are determined by Fn . For simplicity of notation we only distinguish the two
−
distributions by Fn,k and Fn,k
, avoiding verbose notations of S, e.g. EFn,k [S] =
EFn,k [Sn,k ]. It is then easy to see Zn = N (Sn,0 ).
Now by telescoping:
EFn [f ] − EΦn [f ] = EFn,0 [f ◦ N (S)] − EFn,n [f ◦ N (S)]
n
X
≤
EFn,i−1 [f ◦ N (S)] − EF − [f ◦ N (S)] + EF − [f ◦ N (S)] − EFn,i [f ◦ N (S)] .
n,i
n,i
i=1
Let ∂i be the derivative with respect to the i-th row S[i]. Using Taylor’s expansion
−
at Sn,k
, we have
EFn,i [f ◦ N ] − EF − [f ◦ N ]
n,i
i
1 h
1
T
= √ EF − [∂i f ◦ N (S)] 0 + Tr EF − ∂i2 f ◦ N (S) · Σ(Fn ) + Rn,i
n,i
n
n n,i
where the precise form of the Taylor remainder Rn,i depends on realizing the laws Fn,i
−
and Fn,i
on the same probability space. In order to not introduce new notation, we have
avoided explicitly writing out this construction, directing readers to Chatterjee (2005)
for details. Nevertheless,
1
Ω
− 23
0
0
3
√
|Rn,i | ≤ c1 (p)[λ3 (f ) · n ]EF − exp Ω(N (S)) +
Ω(ξi,n ) kξi,n k1
n,i
n
0
where ξi,n
are centered version of ξi,n and c1 is some dimension dependent constant.
Let C(Ω) be the constant s.t Ω(·) ≤ C(Ω)k · k1 , C(Ω) only depends on the dimension p. Thus, using the independence of the ξi,n ’s,
1
0
0
3
EF − exp Ω(N (S)) + √ Ω(ξi,n ) kξi,n k1
n,i
n
!#
"
0
C(Ω)kξi,n
k1
0
3
√
.
≤EF − [exp (C(Ω)kN (S)k1 )] · EFn kξi,n k1 exp
n,i
n
Now we bound these two expectations. By the exponential moment condition (29)
and Lemma 17, it is easy to conclude the first term is bounded by
lim sup EFn [exp (C(Ω)kZn k1 )] ≤ c2 (p).
n
0
The second expectation is bounded by γ, an upper bound on the third moment of ξi,n
,
"
0
lim sup EFn kξi,n
k31 exp
n
0
C(Ω)kξi,n
k1
√
n
!#
≤ γ,
32
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
Thus it is not hard to see
3
−2
|Rn,i | ≤ c1 (p)c2 (p)γλΩ
.
3 (f )n
Notice the first and second order terms in EFn,i [f ◦ N ] − EF − [f ◦ N ] cancel with
n,i
those in EFn,i−1 [f ◦ N ] − EF − [f ◦ N ], and therefore we have,
n,i
EFn [f ] − EΦn [f ] ≤
n
X
(Rn,i + R̃n,i )
i=1
where R̃n,i is the remainder of EFn,i−1 [f ◦ N ] − EF − [f ◦ N ]. With a similar argument
n,i
3
−2
,
|R̃n,i | ≤ c1 (p)c2 (p)γλΩ
3 (f )n
and summing over n terms, we have the conclusion of the lemma.
Now we prove the main theorem, Theorem 9.
Proof. First, notice that per Lemma 7, we have EΦ∗n [g ◦ P (Tn )] =
the selective likelihood ratio, it is easy to see,
R1
0
g(x)dx. Using
EF∗n [g(P (Tn ))] = EFn [g(P (Tn ))`Fn (Tn )]
The same equation holds for Φn = Φ(Fn ), thus we have
EF∗n [g(P (Tn ))] − EΦ∗n [g(P (Tn ))] ≤
|EFn [g(P (Tn ))`Φn (Tn )] − EΦn [g(P (Tn ))`Φn (Tn )]| +
(48)
|EFn [g(P (Tn ))`Fn (Tn )] − EFn [g(P (Tn ))`Φn (Tn )]|
We need to bound both terms. Recall the notation P n and `¯Fn for the normalized
statistic Zn . If we let f = g(P̄n ) · `¯Φn , then per Lemma 15, we have
|EFn [g(P̄n ) · `¯Φn ] − EΦn [g(P̄n ) · `¯Φn ]| ≤ 2C(p) · C1 n−1/2 ,
where we use the bound in condition (28). Now we replace `Φn with `Fn in the second
term. With some algebra, we can bound it by
h
i
b∗ (Tn , ω)
PFn ×Q M ∈ Q
h
i ,
EFn [g(P (Tn ))`Fn (Tn )] 1 −
b∗ (Tn , ω)
PΦn ×Q M ∈ Q
which in turn is bounded by
C(g)
b∗ ] − P(Φ ×Q) [M ∈ Q
b∗ ]
P(Fn ×Q) [M ∈ Q
n
≤ C(g)C3 n−1/2 ,
b∗ ]
P(Φ ×Q) [M ∈ Q
n
per condition (30) and C(g) is a bound on g.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
33
7.2. Proof of Lemma 7
Proof. Let φµ, n1 Σ denote the density for N (µ, n1 Σ) and T =
1
T
ση2 Ση·(η T )+Vη , we see
∗
that Q(η T T, Vη ) is W(M ; T ) in (13). Thus under the selective law F , the distribution
of T has density proportional to
φµ, n1 Σ (T ) · Q(η T T, Vη ).
Since η T T ⊥ Vη under F, we can factorize φµ, n1 Σ (T ) into the product of densities of
η T T and Vη . Thus conditioning on Vη , the density of η T T is proportional to
n(η T T − η T µ)2
exp −
· Q(η T T, Vη ).
2ση2
Therefore, the pivot in (22) is the survival function of η T T under F∗ and is distributed
as Unif(0, 1). Moreover, we note the distribution does not depend on the conditioned
value of Vη , thus P (T ; η T µ, Σ) in (22) is Unif(0, 1).
References
Bahadur, R. R. (1966), ‘A note on quantiles in large samples’, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 37(3), 577–580.
Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V. & Wang, L. (2011), ‘Square-root lasso: pivotal recovery
of sparse signals via conic programming’, Biometrika 98(4), 791–806.
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. (1995), ‘Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical
and powerful approach to multiple testing’, J R Statist Soc B 57(1), 289–300.
Benjamini, Y. & Stark, P. B. (1996), ‘Nonequivariant simultaneous confidence intervals less likely to contain zero’, Journal of the American Statistical Association
91(433), 329–337.
URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2291411
Chatterjee, S. (2005), ‘A simple invariance theorem’, arXiv preprint math/0508213 .
Chung, E., Romano, J. P. et al. (2013), ‘Exact and asymptotically robust permutation
tests’, The Annals of Statistics 41(2), 484–507.
Cox, D. (1975), ‘A note on data-splitting for the evaluation of significance levels’,
Biometrika 62(2), 441–444.
Dwork, C., Feldman, V., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O. & Roth, A. (2014), ‘Preserving statistical validity in adaptive data analysis’, arXiv:1411.2664 [cs] . arXiv:
1411.2664.
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2664
Fithian, W., Sun, D. & Taylor, J. (2014), ‘Optimal inference after model selection’,
arXiv:1410.2597 [math, stat] . arXiv: 1410.2597.
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.2597
Fithian, W., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. & Tibshirani, R. (2015), ‘Selective Sequential
Model Selection’, ArXiv e-prints .
Gotze, F. (1991), ‘On the rate of convergence in the multivariate clt’, The Annals of
Probability pp. 724–739.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
34
Harris, X. T., Panigrahi, S., Markovic, J., Bi, N. & Taylor, J. (2016), ‘Selective sampling
after solving a convex problem’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05609 .
Lee, J. D., Sun, D. L., Sun, Y. & Taylor, J. E. (2013a), ‘Exact post-selection inference
with the lasso’, arXiv:1311.6238 [math, stat] .
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1311.6238
Lee, J. D. & Taylor, J. E. (2014), ‘Exact post model selection inference for marginal
screening’, arXiv:1402.5596 [cs, math, stat] .
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.5596
Lee, J., Sun, D., Sun, Y. & Taylor, J. (2013b), ‘Exact inference after model selection
via the lasso’, Preprint. Available at .
Lehmann, E. (1986), Testing Statistical Hypotheses, Probability and Statistics Series,
Wiley.
URL: https://books.google.com/books?id=jexQAAAAMAAJ
Lockhart, R., Taylor, J., Tibshirani, R. J. & Tibshirani, R. (2014), ‘A significance test
for the lasso’, The Annals of Statistics 42(2), 413–468.
URL: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1400592161
Meinshausen, N. & Bühlmann, P. (2010), ‘Stability selection’, Journal of the Royal
Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 72(4), 417–473.
URL:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.14679868.2010.00740.x/abstract
Meinshausen, N., Meier, L. & Bühlmann, P. (2009), ‘p-values for high-dimensional
regression’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 104(488), 1671–1681.
URL: http://amstat.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1198/jasa.2009.tm08647
Pakman, A. & Paninski, L. (2012), ‘Exact hamiltonian monte carlo for truncated multivariate gaussians’, arXiv:1208.4118 [stat] . arXiv: 1208.4118.
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4118
Rosenthal, R. (1979), ‘The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.’, Psychological bulletin 86(3), 638.
Taylor, J., Lockhart, R., Tibshirani, R. J. & Tibshirani, R. (2014), ‘Post-selection adaptive inference for least angle regression and the lasso’, arXiv:1401.3889 [stat] .
URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/1401.3889
Tian, X., Bi, N. & Taylor, J. (2016), ‘Magic: a general, powerful and tractable method
for selective inference’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.02630 .
Tian, X., Loftus, J. R. & Taylor, J. E. (2015), ‘Selective inference with unknown variance via the square-root lasso’, arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.08031 .
Tian, X. & Taylor, J. (2015), ‘Asymptotics of selective inference’, arXiv preprint
arXiv:1501.03588 .
Tibshirani, R. (1996), ‘Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso’, Journal of the
Royal Statistical Society: Series B 58(1), 267–288.
Tibshirani, R. J., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R. & Wasserman, L. (2015), ‘Uniform
asymptotic inference and the bootstrap after model selection’, arXiv preprint
arXiv:1506.06266 .
Tukey, J. W. (1980), ‘We need both exploratory and confirmatory’, The American
Statistician 34(1), 23–25.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
35
Appendix A: Proof of Lemma 1
√
Proof. First we normalize the sample mean as Z = n(X̄n + 0.5) and rewrite the
pivot as
1√
1 − Φ(Z)
n,
Pe(Z) =
√ , Z >2+
2
1 − Φ(2 + 21 n)
and Φ is the CDF of the standard normal distribution. As n → √
∞, we can use Mills
ratio to approximate the normal tail. Specifically, denote bn = 12 n + 2,
1 − Φ(Z)
bn
1
≈
exp (bn + Z)(bn − Z)
1 − Φ(bn )
Z
2
(49)
bn
1
= exp − (bn − Z)2 exp [−bn (Z − bn )] , Z > bn .
Z
2
We study the behavior of −bn (Z − bn ) for Z > bn . By studying its distribution, we
p
will also see that Z − bn → 0, for Z > bn , thus the term
1
bn
p
exp − (bn − Z)2 → 1, as n → ∞.
Rn =
Z
2
Now we study the distribution of bn (Z − bn ) conditioning on Z > bn . Since X̄n
is a translation of a binomial distribution divided by n, we can rewrite Z in terms of a
Binomial distribution, which will be useful for calculating the conditional distribution
of bn (Z − bn ). Specifically,
Z=
2Sn − n
√
,
n
1
Sn ∼ Bin(n, ).
2
Thus for t ≥ 0,
2Sn − n
√
− bn
P (bn (Z − bn ) > t) = P bn
n
√
√
3
t n
=P Sn > n + n +
=
4
2bn
√
√
t n
1
4 n− n− 2bn
X
i=0
n
1
· n
i
2
To study the conditional distribution P (bn (Z − bn ) > t | Z > bn ), we essentially need
to study the ratio of two partial sums of binomial coefficients.
Note for any n, m ∈ Z+ , n > m we have
n
m
m−1
=
n
n
−
m+1
m
Noticing that
k
n−k+1
≤
m
n−m+1 ,
for any k ≤ m, thus
Pm−1 n
i
Pi=0
≤
m
n
i=0
i
m
.
n−m+1
36
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
Now let m = 14 n −
√
n, and use the above inequality j =
Pm−j
Pi=0
m
n
i
n
i=0 i
≤
m
n−m+1
√
t n
2bn
times, we have
j
.
Therefore we have,
P (bn (Z − bn ) > t | Z > bn ) =
≤
P (bn (Z − bn ) > t)
P (bn (Z − bn ) > 0)
√
1+ t√4
− n
n
→ exp[− log(3)t]
√
3
n
+
n
+
1
4
1
4n
(50)
p
We can draw two conclusions from (50). First, conditional on Z > bn , Z − bn → 0,
which implies the first term in the pivot approximation (49) Rn → 1. Moreover, (50)
shows that the overshoot bn (Z − bn ) is not Exp(1) distributed in the limit. In fact,
we can conclude its limit (if existed) is strictly stochastically dominated by an Exp(1).
Thus,
exp [−bn (Z − bn )] 6→ Unif(0, 1),
and hence the pivot does not converge to Unif(0, 1).
Appendix B: Proof of Lemma 14
Proof. We first prove that T is in fact a linearizable statistic. Since β̄E is the restricted
MLE, we see that
1 T
XE y − πE (β̄E )
n
1 T
∗
∗
[y − πE (βE
)] + Q(βE
− β̄E ) + R1 ,
= XE
n
0=
∗
∗
− β̄E ) + R̃1 , where R̃1 = op (n−1/2 ) is the residual
) − Q)(βE
where R1 = (QE (βE
∗
∗
) from its
from the Taylor’s expansion at βE . R1 = op (n−1/2 ) since deviations QE (βE
−1/2
∗
asymptotic mean should be Op (n
) and β̄E − βE = op (1).
Thus, we can deduce
β̄E =
1 −1 T
∗
∗
Q XE [y − πE (βE
)] + βE
+ Q−1 R1 .
n
Similarly,
1 T
1 T
1
∗
T
∗
X−E y − πE (XE β̄E ) = X−E
[y−πE (βE
)]− DXE
[y−πE (βE
)]+op (n−1/2 )
n
n
n
Thus we can conclude that T is a linearizable statistic with
T
∗
QXi,E
(yi − π(xi,E βE
))
ξi,n =
.
T
∗
∗
Xi,−E
(yi − π(xi,E βE
)) − DXi,E (yi − π(xi,E βE
))
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
37
Now we rewrite the selection event in terms of (T, ω). Using the KKT conditions of
(38),
√
β̂E
T
X (y − πE (β̂E )) = n(ω + Λz) +
0
(51)
sE β̂E ≥ 0, ku−E k∞ < 1,
, sE = sign(β̂E ) and u−E is the subgradient for the inactive
sE
u−E
variables. Using a Taylor expansion on the β̂E as well, we see that
1
1 T
0
Q
X [y − πE (β̂E )] =
+
(β̄E − β̂E ) + op (n−1/2 ).
T
C
X
[y
−
π
(
β̄
)]
n
n
E E
−E
where z =
Plugging in the equalities in the KKT conditions, we will have,
1
β̂E = β̄E − √ Q−1 (ωE + ΛE zE ) + op (n−1/2 )
n
1 T
1 T
X [y − πE (β̂E )] = X−E [y − πE (β̄E )] + C(β̄E − β̂E ) + op (n−1/2 )
n −E
n
1
1 T
[y − πE (β̄E )] + √ D(ωE + ΛE zE ) + op (n−1/2 )
= X−E
n
n
Using the inequalities in the KKT conditions, we have the selection event is {AM T +
BM ω ≤ bM } with AM , BM and bM defined in the lemma.
Appendix C: Proofs related to Logistic noise
Throughout the article, logistic noise has played an important role in all the examples.
The following lemma on the tail behavior of the logistic distribution is crucial to all
the proofs with added logistic noise. Let G be the CDF of Logistic(κ), with κ being
the scale parameter. g is the PDF of G.
G(w) =
eκw
,
1 + eκw
g(w) =
κe−κ|w|
1 + e−κ|w|
2 .
Lemma 16. The following lower bounds hold,
Ḡ(κw) ≥
1 −κ|w|
e
,
2
g(w) ≥
1 −κ|w|
e
.
4
(52)
For k = 0, 1, 2, 3, . . . :
∂k
ek e−κ|w| .
g(w) ≤ κk+1 C
∂wk
ek ’s are universal constants.
where C
(53)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
38
Proof. We can write
(
g(w) =
κe−κw h0 (e−κw ) w > 0
κeκw h0 (eκw )
w≤0
where h0 (x) = (1 + x)−2 . For j ≥ 1, define hj (x) = x · h0j−1 (x). By induction,
I claim that for each j, hj is rational such that the polynomial in the numerator is of
order 2 less than the denominator, and the denominator polynomial is bounded below
by 1. Hence, hj ’s are bounded on the interval [0, 1]. Now, it is not hard to see that
(
Pk
−(−κ)k+1 j=0 cj,k hj (e−κw )e−κw w > 0
∂k
g(w)
=
P
k
∂wk
κk+1 j=0 cj,k hj (eκw )eκw
w≤0
for universal cj,k ’s and k = 0, 1, 2, . . . .
Now we state the following lemmas which are foundations of the proofs of various
lemmas in the article.
Lemma 17. Assume Tn is a decomposable statistic and ξi,n has mean 0, variance σ 2 ,
and centered exponential
moments in a neighbourhood of zero, i.e satisfies condition
√
(29). Denote Zn = n(Tn − µn ), then
2 2
κ σ
E [exp (κZn )] → exp
, for κ > 0.
2
√
Lemma 18. In Example 2, if we normalize the sample mean Zn = n(X̄n − µn ), we
can rewrite the selective likelihood ratio and the pivot as
√
Ḡ(2 − Zn − nµn )
,
`¯Fn (Zn ) =
√
EFn Ḡ(2 − Zn − nµn )
and
R∞
P (Zn ) =
n
RZ
∞
−∞
√
nµn ) exp(−t2 /2) dt
.
√
Ḡ(2 − t − nµn ) exp(−t2 /2) dt
Ḡ(2 − t −
Then for any Fn with finite centered exponential moment in a neighbourhood of
zero, we have for k = 0, 1, 2, 3
∂k ¯
`F (Z) ≤ C1 exp[κ|Z|],
∂Z k n
∂k
P (Z) ≤ C1 .
∂Z k
(54)
for some C1 only depending on κ.
Proof of Lemma 17.
Pn
Proof. Without loss of generality, we assume Tn = n1 i=1 ξi,n . Since Fn has centered exponential moments in a neighbourhood of zero, it is each to see
n
κ
E [exp (κZn )] = M √
n
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
39
exists as long as √κn < a. M (·) is the moment generating function of ξi,n − µn ,
M (t) = EFn [exp(t(ξi,n − µ))]. Therefore,
√1
t= n
κ
log [M (κt)]
lim n log M √
= lim
n→∞
t→0
t2
n
κ2 M 00 (κt)
κ2 σ 2
= lim
=
.
t→0 2M (κt)
2
To derive the equality, we used M 00 (0) = Var [ξi,n ] = σ 2 and M 0 (0) = 0, M (0) =
1.
Proof of Lemma 18.
Proof. Noticing the lower bound in (52), we have
i 1 h
i
√
√
1 h
√
E Ḡ(2 − Zn − nµn ) ≥ E e(−κ|2−Zn − nµn |) ≥ E e(−κ|2−Zn |−κ n|µn |)
2
2
On the other hand, using the upper bounds in (53), we have for k = 1, 2, 3,
√
ek−1 eκ|2−Z|
ek−1 e−κ|2−Z− nµn |
κk C
∂k ¯
κk C
h
i
≤
2
`
(Z)
≤
2
√
F
n
∂Z k
E e(−κ|2−Z|)
E e(−κ|2−Z|−κ n|µn |)
Since x−1 is convex on the positive axis, it is hard to see
h
i
1
≤ E e(κ|2−Z|) ≤ e2κ E eκZ + e−κZ .
(−κ|2−Z|)
E e
Thus using Lemma 17, we know E e±κZ → exp(κ2 /2). Thus, we conclude
sup
n
∂k ¯
`F (Z) ≤ C1 exp[κ |Z|],
∂Z k n
k = 1, 2, 3.
(55)
√
To verify the above inequality for k = 0. Notice that for µn ≥ 0, Ḡ(2 − Z − nµn ) ≤
Ḡ(2 − Z). Thus the denominator of `¯Fn (Z) is bounded below using the argument
above. For µ < 0,
√
√
√
Ḡ(2 − Z − nµn ) ≤ exp(−κ(2 − Z − nµn ) ≤ exp(−κ n |µn | + κ |2 − Z|).
√
The term exp(−κ n |µn |) cancels with the one in the denominator, thus (55) holds for
k = 0 as well.
Analogously, similar bounds can be derived for the derivatives of P (Z) as well, thus
we have the conclusion of the lemma.
C.1. Proof of Lemma 4 and Lemma 10
.
The proof of Lemma 4 is a simple application of Lemma 17 and Lemma 18.
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
40
Proof. By law of large numbers, we know that X̄n is consistent for µ unselectively.
Thus, using the result by Lemma 3, we only need to verify that the selective likelihood
is integrable in Lq . For simplicity, we take q = 2.
First notice from (54) that the selective likelihood ratio is bounded by a multiple of
exp[κ|Z|]. Then by Lemma 17,
lim sup EFn `Fn (X̄)2 ≤ 2C12 exp(2κ2 ).
n
The proof of Lemma 10 uses results in Lemma 18 and Lemma 15
Proof. It follows simply from (54) that condition (28) are satisfied with the norm function Ω simply being the absolute value function. Therefore, we only need to verify (30).
Note for µn = µ < 0
√
√
PFn ×Q [ nXn + ω > 2] − PΦ×Q [ nXn + ω > 2]
√
PΦ×Q [ nXn + ω > 2]
√
√
EFn Ḡ(2 − Z − nµ) − EΦ Ḡ(2 − Z − nµ)
=
√
EΦ Ḡ(2 − Z − nµ)
√
√
√
exp(−κ nµ)EFn Ḡ(2 − Z − nµ) − EΦ Ḡ(2 − Z − nµ)
≤2
EΦ [exp(−κ|2 − Z|)]
√
√
≤2EΦ [exp(2κ + 2|Z|)] · C exp(−κ nµ) exp(κ nµ)n−1/2
≤2C exp(κ2 )n−1/2 ,
√
Ω
The second to last inequality uses Lemma 15
√ and the fact that λ3 (Ḡ) ≤ exp(κ nµ).
For µn = µ ≥ 0, the denominator PΦ×Q [ nXn + ω > 2] is bounded below, and Ḡ
has bounded derivatives. Therefore, a simple application of the Berry-Esseen Theorem
will suffice.
Appendix D: Proofs related to affine selection regions
D.1. Proof of Lemma 12
The quantity that appears in both the pivot and the selective likelihood ratio is
Z
Q(z; ∆) = P(A(z + ∆) + ω ∈ K) =
G(dw),
K−A(z+∆)
where ω ∼ G. The associated selective likelihood in terms of z is
`F (z; ∆) = R
Q(z; ∆)
.
Q(t; ∆)F(dt)
Rq
We first rewrite the pivot in terms of U .
R∞
Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 ) dt
ηT z
P (z; ∆) = R ∞
,
Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 ) dt
−∞
(56)
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
41
where we use the slight abuse of notation for the one dimensional function Q(t; Lz, ∆)
1
Σηη T
ση2
1
Q(t; Lu, ∆) = P(t · 2 AΣη + ALu + A∆ + w ∈ K)
ση
Z
=
G(dw).
L=I−
K−t· σ12 AΣη−ALu−A∆
η
We first establish a lower bound on EF [Q(Z; ∆)] = PFn ×Q [A(Z + ∆) + ω ∈ K]
under the local alternatives.
Lemma 19. If we assume the lower bound condition, then under the local alternatives
with radius B, i.e. dh (0, K − A∆) ≤ B, we have
Z
Q(u; ∆)F(du) ≥ C − C(Φ, h) · e−B ,
Rp
where C(Φ, h) is a constant only depending on the normal distribution Φ = N (0, Σ)
and the norm h in the local alternatives condition.
Proof. We first see that the lower bound condition gives the following lower bound.
Z
−
Q(u; ∆) =
G(dw) ≥ C exp −
inf
h(w) .
(57)
w∈K−A(u+∆)
K−A(u+∆)
Consider
Z
Z
Q(u; ∆)F(du) ≥ C −
exp −
inf
h(w) F(du)
w∈K−A(∆+u)
Rp
Rp
Z
= C−
exp − inf
h(w − Au) F(du)
w∈K−A∆
Rp
Z
≥ C−
exp − inf
h(w) + h(−Au) F(du)
w∈K−A∆
Rp
Z
= C − · exp − inf
h(w)
e−h(Au) F(du)
w∈K−A∆
Rp
Z
−
=C
e−h(Au) F(du) · e−B .
Rp
Finally, since the exp(−h(Au)) has uniformly bounded derivatives up to the third
order, we have
Z
Z
exp(−h(Au))F(du) →
exp(−h(Au))Φ(du)
Rp
Rp
as Z → N (0, Σ) in distribution. Let C(Φ, h) =
have the conclusion of the lemma.
R
Rp
exp(−h(Au))Φ(du), and we will
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
42
The following lemmas establish the bounds on the derivatives for the likelihood
function `F and the pivot P (u; ∆). Lemma 12 is easily obtained using Lemma 20 and
Lemma 21 below.
Lemma 20. Suppose the smoothness and the lower bound conditions are satisfied,
then for local alternatives with radius B,
∂α
`F (z; ∆) ≤ C ∗ (B, Φ, h),
∂z α
Φ = N (0, Σ).
(58)
Proof. The smoothness condition implies the following upper bound. For a multi-index
α, we have
Z
∂α
∂α
Q(z; ∆) = α
g(w)dw
∂z α
∂z K−A(∆+z)
Z
∂α
g(w − Az)dw.
=
α
K−A∆ ∂z
Therefore, from the smoothness condition,
∂α
def
Q(z; ∆) ≤ C(A)Cα = Cα+ (A).
∂z α
(59)
This combined with Lemma 19 gives the conclusion of the lemma.
Next, we derive the exponential bounds on the derivatives of the pivot P (z; ∆) with
respect to z.
Lemma 21. Assuming the conditions of Lemma 12, for a multi-index α up to the order
of 3,
∂α
P (z; ∆) ≤ Cα∗ · eα·Lip(h)kALzk2 ,
∂z α
where the norm on the left is the element-wise maximum and C is independent of (z, ∆)
and Lip(h) is the Lipschitz constant of h with respect to `2 norm.
Proof. To get a lower bound on the denominator, note (57)
1
−
Q(t; Lz, ∆) ≥ C exp −
inf
h(w − t · 2 AΣη)
w∈K−ALz−A∆
ση
≥ C − exp −
inf
h(w) − |t|h(AΣη/ση2 ) .
w∈K−ALz−A∆
Therefore, the denominator will be lower bounded by
Z ∞
1
√
Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 )dt
2π −∞
−
2 2 2
≥C exp h(AΣη/ση ) ση /2 · exp −
inf
h(w)
w∈K−ALz−A∆
≥C − exp h(AΣη/ση2 )2 ση2 /2 e−B · e−h(ALz) .
43
Tian and Taylor/Selective inference with a randomized response
On the other hand, the upper bound (59) ensures,
Z
∂α
1
√
Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 )dt ≤ Cα+ (A).
2π R ∂z α
Note the derivatives of the pivot will be a polynomial in terms of the form,
R∞
∂ Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 )dt
ηT z α
R∞
Q(t; Lz, ∆) exp(−t2 /2ση2 )dt
−∞
and therefore, it is easy to get the conclusion of the lemma.
D.2. Proof of Lemma 13
Using Lemma 19 and the following lemma, we can easily prove Lemma 13.
√
Lemma 22. Let Zn = n(Tn − µn ) ∈ Rp , and Fn has finite third moments γ.
Moreover, suppose the randomization noise ω ∈ Q, a probability measure on Rd . Then
for any sequence of sets (Un )n≥1 , Un ⊆ Rp × Rd , we have
1
|PFn ×Q [(Zn , ω) ∈ Un ] − PΦn ×Q [(Zn , ω) ∈ Un ]| ≤ C3 γn− 2 ,
where Φn = N (µ(Fn ), Σ(Fn )) and C3 is a constant depending only on p.
Proof of Lemma 22 uses the well known results of Berry-Esseen Theorem. A multivariate extension can be found in Gotze (1991).
Proof. For each ω, we denote
Un (ω) = {Z ∈ Rp : (Z, ω) ∈ Un } ⊆ Rp .
Thus the difference in the two probabilities is
|PFn ×Q [(Z, ω) ∈ Un ] − PΦn ×Q [(Z, ω) ∈ Un ]|
≤EQ [|PFn [Z ∈ Un (ω)] − PΦ [Z ∈ Un (ω)]|]
≤ sup |Fn (U ) − Φn (U )| < C3 γn−1/2 ,
U ∈Rp
where C3 only depends on the dimension p. The last inequality is a direct application
of equation (1.5) in Gotze (1991).
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1204.2394v5 [math.AC] 26 Feb 2013
ON INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS OF
LOCAL COHOMOLOGY MODULES
MAJID RAHRO ZARGAR AND HOSSEIN ZAKERI
Abstract. Let (R, m) be a commutative Noetherian local ring and let M be an Rmodule which is a relative Cohen-Macaulay with respect to a proper ideal a of R and
set n := ht M a. We prove that injdimM < ∞ if and only if injdimHn
a (M ) < ∞ and
that injdimHn
a (M ) = injdimM − n. We also prove that if R has a dualizing complex
n
and Gid R M < ∞, then Gid R Hn
a (M ) < ∞ and Gid R Ha (M ) = Gid R M − n. More-
over if R and M are Cohen-Macaulay, then it is proved that Gid R M < ∞ whenever
Gid R Hn
a (M ) < ∞. Next, for a finitely generated R-module M of dimension d, it is proved
d
d
that if KM
c is Cohen-Macaulay and Gid R Hm (M ) < ∞, then Gid R Hm (M ) = depth R−d.
The above results have consequences which improve some known results and provide
characterizations of Gorenstein rings.
1. introduction
Throughout this paper, R is a commutative Noetherian ring, a is a proper ideal of R
and M is an R-module. For a prime ideal p of R, the residue class field Rp /pRp is denoted
by k(p). For each non-negative integer i, let Hia (M ) denotes the i-th local cohomology
module of M with respect to a; see [1] for its definition and basic results. Also, we use
injdimR M to denote the usual injective dimension of M . The notion of Gorenstein injective
module was introduced by E.E. Enochs and O.M.G. Jenda in [4]. The class of Gorenstein
injective modules is greater than the class of injective modules; but they are same classes
whenever R is a regular local ring. The Gorenstein injective dimension of M , which is
denoted by Gid R M , is defined in terms of resolutions of Gorenstein injective modules. This
notion has been used in [3, 15, 21] and has led to some interesting results. Notice that
Gid R M ≤ injdimR M and the equality holds if injdimR M < ∞.
The principal aim of this paper is to study the injective (resp. Gorenstein injective)
dimension of certain R-modules in terms of injective (resp. Gorenstein injective) dimension
of its local cohomology modules at support a.
In this paper we will use the concept of relative Cohen-Macaulay modules which has been
studied in [7] under the title of cohomologically complete intersections. The organization
of this paper is as follows. In section 2, among other things, we prove, in 2.5, that if
M is relative Cohen-Macaulay with respect to a, then injdimM and injdimHht M a (M ) are
a
simultaneously finite and there is an equality injdimHaht M a (M ) = injdimM − ht M a. Then,
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13D05, 13D45.
Key words and phrases. Injective dimension, Gorenstein injective dimension, Local cohomology, Gorenstein ring, Relative Cohen-Macaulay module.
1
2
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
as a corollary, we obtain a characterization of Gorenstein rings. Next, in 2.10, for all n ≥ 0
and any p ∈ Supp (M ), we establish a comparison between the Bass numbers of HnpRp (Mp )
dim (R/p) (M ) whenever (R, m) is a homomorphic image of a Gorenstein ring and
and Hn+
m
M is finitely generated.
In section 3, we first prove some basic properties about Gorenstein injective dimension
of a module. In particular, Proposition 3.6 indicates that Gorenstein injective dimension is
a refinement of the injective dimension. As a main result, in Theorem 3.8 we establish a
Gorenstein injective version of 2.5. Indeed, it is proved that if, in addition to the hypothesis
of 2.5, R has a dualizing complex, then Gid R M < ∞ implies Gid R Hna (M ) < ∞ and the
converse holds whenever R and M are Cohen-Macaulay. This theorem has consequences
which recover some interesting results that have currently been appeared in the literature.
As a first corollary of 3.8, we deduce that Gid R Hnm (M ) = Gid R M − n, wherever M is a
Cohen-Macaulay module over the Cohen-Macaulay local ring (R, m) and dim M = n. This
corollary improves the main result [15, Theorem 3.10](see the explanation which is offered
before 3.9). As a second corollary, we obtain a characterization of Gorenstein local rings
which recovers [21, Theorem 2.6]. As a main result, it has been shown in [15, Theorem
3.10] that if R and M are Cohen-Macaulay with dim M = d and Gid R Hdm (M ) < ∞, then
Gid R Hdm (M ) = dim R − d. In 3.12, we will use the canonical module of a module to improve
the above result without Cohen-Macaulay assumption on R and M . This result provides
some characterizations of Gorenstein local rings.
2. local cohomology and injective dimension
The starting point of this section is the next proposition, which plays essential role in the
proof of Theorems 2.5 and 3.8.
Proposition 2.1. Let n be a non-negative integer and let N be an a-torsion R-module.
Suppose that Hia (M ) = 0 for all i 6= n. Then
Ext iR (N, Hna (M )) ∼
= Ext i+n
R (N, M )
for all i ≥ 0.
Proof. First we notice that Hom R (N, M ) = Hom R (N, Γa (M )). Hence, in view of [14,
Theorem 10.47], we have the Grothendieck third quadrant spectral sequence with
E2p,q = Ext pR (N, Hqa (M )) =⇒ Ext p+q
R (N, M ).
p
Now, since
Hqa (M )
= 0 for all q 6= n,
E2p,q
= 0 for all q 6= n. Therefore, this spectral sequence
collapses in the column q = n; and hence one gets, for all i ≥ 0, the isomorphism
Ext iR (N, Hna (M )) ∼
= Ext i+n
R (N, M ),
as required.
The following corollary, which is an immediate consequence of 2.1, determines the Bass
numbers µi (p, Hna (M )) := vdim k(p) Ext iRp (k(p), HnaRp (Mp )) of the local cohomology module
Hna (M ).
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
3
Corollary 2.2. Let n and M be as in 2.1. Then, for all p ∈ V(a), µi (p, Hna (M )) =
µi+n (p, M ) for each i ≥ 0.
Definition 2.3. We say that a finitely generated R-module M is relative Cohen Macaulay
with respect to a if there is precisely one non-vanishing local cohomology module of M with
respect to a. Clearly this is the case if and only if grade (a, M ) = cd (a, M ), where cd (a, M )
is the largest integer i for which Hia (M ) 6= 0 and grade (a, M ) is the least integer i such that
Hia (M ) 6= 0.
Observe that the above definition provides a generalization of the concept of CohenMacaulay modules. Also, notice that the notion of relative Cohen-Macaulay modules is
connected with the notion of cohomologically complete intersection ideals which has been
studied in [7] and has led to some interesting results. Furthermore, such modules have been
studied in [8] over certain rings.
Remark 2.4. Let M be a relative Cohen-Macaulay module with respect to a and let
cd (a, M ) = n. Then, in view of [1, Theorems 6.1.4, 4.2.1, 4.3.2], it is easy to see that
Supp Hna (M ) = Supp (M/aM ) and ht M a = grade (a, M ), where ht M a = inf{ dim Rp Mp | p ∈
Supp (M/aM ) }.
The following theorem, which is one of the main results of this section, provides a comparison between the injective dimensions of a relative Cohen-Macaulay module and its non-zero
local cohomology module. Here we adopt the convention that the injective dimension of the
zero module is to be taken as −∞.
Theorem 2.5. Let (R, m) be local and let n be a non-negative integer such that Hia (M ) = 0
for all i 6= n.
(i) If injdimM < ∞, then injdimHna (M ) < ∞.
(ii) The converse holds whenever M is finitely generated.
Furthermore, if M is non-zero finitely generated, then injdimHna (M ) = injdimM − n.
Proof. (i). Let s := injdimM < ∞. We may assume that Hna (M ) 6= 0; and hence s − n ≥ 0.
Therefore, in view of 2.2, µi+(s−n) (p, Hna (M )) = 0 for all p ∈ Spec (R) and for all i > 0; so
that injdimHna (M ) ≤ s − n.
(ii). Suppose that M is finitely generated. We first notice that Hna (M ) = 0 if and only if
M = aM ; and this is the case if and only if M = 0. Therefore we may assume that Hna (M ) 6=
0. Suppose that t := injdimHna (M ) < ∞. Then there exists a prime ideal q of R such that
µt (q, Hna (M )) 6= 0. Hence, by 2.2, µt+n (q, M ) 6= 0. Next we show that µt+n+i (p, M ) = 0
for all p ∈ Spec (R) and for all i > 0. Assume the contrary. Then there exists a prime ideal
p of R such that µt+n+j (p, M ) 6= 0 for some j > 0. Let r := dim R/p. Then, by [11, §18,
Lemma 4], we have µt+n+j+r (m, M ) 6= 0. Hence, by 2.2, µj+t+r (m, Hna (M )) 6= 0 which is a
contradiction in view of the choice of t. Therefore, injdimM ≤ t + n. The final assertion is
a consequence of (i) and (ii).
4
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
Next, we provide an example to show that if R is non-local, then Theorem 2.5(ii) is no
longer true. Also, in 3.11, we present two examples which show that 2.5(ii) and 2.5(i),
respectively, are no longer true without the finiteness and the relative Cohen-Macaulayness
assumptions on M .
Example 2.6. Suppose that R is a non-local Artinian ring with injdimR = ∞. Let
L
Max (R) = {m1 , ..., mn }. Then, in view of [17, Exercise 8.49], we have R = m∈Max (R) Γm (R).
Now, since the injective dimension of R is infinite, there exists a maximal ideal mt of R
L
such that the injective dimension of Γmt (R) is infinite. Set M := ER (R/ms ) Γmt (R),
where ms ∈ Max (R) with ms 6= mt . Then M is a finitely generated R-module with infinite
injective dimension and Hims (M ) = 0 for all i 6= 0; but Γms (M ) is injective.
It is well-known that if (R, m, k) is a d-dimensional local ring, then R is Gorenstein if and
only if R is Cohen-Macaulay and Hd (R) ∼
= ER (k). The following corollary, which recovers
m
this fact, is an immediate consequence of 2.5.
Corollary 2.7. Let (R, m) be local and let R be relative Cohen-Macaulay with respect to a.
Then R is Gorenstein if and only if injdimHaht R a (R) is finite.
In particular, if x = x1 , ..., xn is an R-sequence for some non-negative integer n, then R
is Gorenstein if and only if injdimHn(x) (R) is finite.
The following proposition, which is needed in the proof of 3.8, provides an explicit minimal
injective resolution for the non-zero local cohomology module of a relative Cohen-Macaulay
module.
Proposition 2.8. Suppose that M is relative Cohen-Macaulay with respect to a and that
n = cd (a, M ). Then
0 −→ Hna (M ) −→
M
µn (p, M )E(R/p) −→
p∈V(a)
is a minimal injective resolution for
M
µn+1 (p, M )E(R/p) −→ · · ·
p∈V(a)
Hna (M ).
Furthermore, Ass R Hna (M ) = {p ∈ V(a)| µn (p, M ) 6=
0}.
Proof. Let
d−1
d0
dn−1
dn
dn+1
0 −→ M −→ E0 (M ) −→ · · · −→ En−1 (M ) −→ En (M ) −→ En+1 (M ) −→ · · ·
be a minimal injective resolution for M . If there exists a prime ideal p in V(a) with
µn−1 (p, M ) 6= 0, then depth Rp Mp ≤ n − 1. On the other hand, since p ∈ Supp (M/aM ), 2.4
implies that HnaRp (Mp ) 6= 0. Therefore n = grade Rp (aRp , Mp ) ≤ depth Rp Mp ≤ n − 1 which
is a contradiction. It follows that Γa (E n−1 (M )) = 0; and hence we obtain the minimal
injective resolution
0 −→ Hna (M ) −→ Γa (En (M )) −→ Γa (En+1 (M )) −→ · · ·
for Hna (M ). Now, we may use this resolution to complete the proof.
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
5
The following elementary lemma, which is needed in the proof of the next theorem, can
be proved by using a minimal free resolution for M and the concept of localization.
Lemma 2.9. Let (R, m, k) be local and let M be finitely generated. Then, for any prime
R
ideal p of R, vdim k(p) Tor i p (k(p), Mp ) ≤ vdim k Tor R
i (k, M ) for all i ≥ 0.
The next theorem provides a comparison of Bass numbers of certain local cohomology
modules.
Theorem 2.10. Suppose that (R, m, k) is a local ring which is a homomorphic image of a
Gorenstein local ring and that M is finitely generated. Let n, m be non-negative integers.
Then µm (p, Hn (M )) ≤ µm (m, Hn+dim R/p (M )) for all p ∈ Spec (R).
p
m
Proof. Let (R′ , m′ ) be a Gorenstein local ring of dimension n′ for which there exists a surjective ring homomorphism f : R′ → R. Let p be a prime ideal of R and set p′ = f −1 (p).
Now Rp′ ′ is a Gorenstein local ring and dim R′ /p′ = dim R/p. Since R′ is Gorenstein, we
have dim Rp′ ′ = dim R′ − dim R′ /p′ . In view of [1, Exercise 11.3.1] there is, for each j ∈ Z,
j
an Rp -isomorphism Ext jR′ (Mp , Rp′ ′ ) ∼
= (Ext R′ (M, R′ ))p . Also, by the Local Duality Thep′
n′ −n−t
orem [1, Theorem 11.2.6], we have HnpRp (Mp ) ∼
(Mp , Rp′ ′ ), ERp (k(p))
= Hom Rp Ext R
′
p′
n′ −n−t
∼
as Rp -modules, where t := dim R/p, and Hn+t
(M, R′ ), ER (k)). It
m (M ) = Hom R (Ext R′
therefore follows that
n
n′ −n−t
m
∼
Ext m
(Mp , Rp′ ′ ), ERp (k(p))))
Rp (k(p), HpRp (Mp )) = Ext Rp (k(p), Hom Rp (Ext R′ ′
p
′
p
n −n−t
∼ Hom R (Tor R
(Mp , R′ ′ )), ER (k(p))).
=
m (k(p), Ext ′
p
Rp ′
p
p
and
n+t
Ext m
R (k, Hm (M ))
n′ −n−t
∼
(M, R′ ), ER (k)))
= Ext m
R (k, Hom R (Ext R′
′
n
−n−t
R
∼ Hom R (Tor (k, Ext ′
(M, R′ )), ER (k)).
=
m
R
Since by 2.9
R
′
′
n −n−t
n −n−t
vdim k(p) (Tor mp (k(p), Ext R
(Mp , Rp′ ′ ))) ≤ vdim k (Tor R
(M, R′ ))), one
′
m (k, Ext R′
p′
may use the above isomorphisms to complete the proof.
It is known as Bass’s conjecture that if a local ring admits a finitely generated module
of finite injective dimension, then it is a Cohen-Macaulay ring. For the proof of this fact
the reader is referred to [12] and [13]. In the next corollary we shall use this fact and the
concept of a generalized Cohen-Macaulay module. Recall that, over a local ring (R, m), a
finitely generated module of positive dimension is a generalized Cohen-Macaulay module if
Him (M ) is finitely generated for all 0 ≤ i < dim M .
Corollary 2.11. Let the situation be as in 2.10. Then the following statements hold.
dim R/p (M ) for all prime ideals p of R and for
(i) injdimRp HnpRp (Mp ) ≤ injdimR Hn+
m
any n ≥ 0.
(ii) If M is generalized Cohen-Macaulay with dimension d such that Hdm (M ) is injective,
then Mp is Gorenstein, in the sense of [18], for all p ∈ Supp (M ) \ {m}.
6
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
Proof. (i) is clear by 2.10.
(ii) Let p ∈ Supp (M ) \ {m}. By [1, Exercise 9.5.7], Mp is Cohen-Macaulay and dim Mp +
dim R/p = dim M . Hence, in view of (i) and 2.5, we have injdimMp = dim Mp . Therefore,
by [18, Theorem 3.11], [2, Theorem 3.1.17] and Bass’s conjecture, Mp is Gorenstein.
3. local cohomology and gorenstein injective dimension
We first recall some definitions that we will use in this section.
Definition 3.1. Following [4], an R-module M is said to be Gorenstein injective if there
exists a Hom (Inj, −) exact exact sequence
· · · → E1 → E0 → E 0 → E 1 → · · ·
of injective R-modules such that M = Ker (E 0 → E 1 ). We say that an exact sequence
0 → M → G0 → G1 → G2 → · · ·
of R-modules and R-homomorphisms is a Gorenstein injective resolution for M , if each Gi
is Gorenstein injective. We say that Gid R M ≤ n if and only if M has a Gorenstein injective
resolution of length n. If there is no shorter resolution, we set Gid R M = n. Dually, an
R-module M is said to be Gorenstein projective if there is a Hom (−, P roj) exact exact
sequence
· · · → P1 → P0 → P 0 → P 1 → · · ·
of projective R-modules such that M = Ker (P 0 → P 1 ). Similarly, one can define the
Gorenstein projective dimension, Gpd R M , of M .
Definition 3.2. For a local ring R admitting the dualizing complex DR , we denote by KM
the canonical module of an R-module M , which is defined to be
KM = Hd−n (RHom R (M, DR )),
where d = dim R and n = dim M . Note that if R is Cohen-Macaulay, then KR coincides
with the classical definition of the canonical module of R which is denoted by ωR .
Definition 3.3. Let R be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring of Krull dimension d which admits
a canonical module ωR . Following [4], let J0 (R) be the class of R-modules M which satisfies
the following conditions.
(i) Ext iR (ωR , M ) = 0 , for all i > 0.
(ii) Tor R
i (ωR , Hom R (ωR , M )) = 0, for all i > 0.
(iii) The natural map ωR ⊗R Hom R (ωR , M ) → M is an isomorphism.
This class of R-modules is called the Bass class.
Definition 3.4. Following [19], let a and b be ideals of R. We set
W (a, b) = { p ∈ Spec (R) | an ⊆ p + b for some integer n > 0}.
For an R-module M , Γa,b (M ) denotes a submodule of M consisting of all elements of M
with support in W (a, b), that is, Γa,b (M ) = { x ∈ M | Supp (Rx) ⊆ W (a, b)}.
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
7
The following lemma has been proved in [10, Lemma 4.2] and is of assistance in the proof
of Proposition 3.6.
Lemma 3.5. Let (R, m, k) be local. Then
Ext iR (ER (k), M ) ∼
= Ext iR̂ (ER̂ (k), M ⊗R R̂)
= Ext iR (E(k), M ⊗R R̂) ∼
for all i ≥ 0.
Let (R, m, k) be local and let M be a non-zero non-injective R-module of finite Gorenstein injective dimension. It was shown in [5, Corollary 4.4] that if Ext iR (E, M ) = 0
for all i ≥ 0 and all indecomposable injective R-modules E 6= ER (k), then Gid R M =
sup{ i | Ext iR (ER (k), M ) 6= 0}. Our next proposition, which is concerned with this result,
indicates that Gorenstein injective dimension is a refinement of the injective dimension.
However we will use 3.6 and 3.7 to prove the main theorem 3.8.
Proposition 3.6. Let (R, m, k) be local and let M be non-zero with Gid R M < ∞. If either
M is finitely generated or Artinian, then
Gid R M = sup{ i | Ext iR (ER (k), M ) 6= 0}.
Proof. First assume that M is finitely generated. Then, by [3, Theorem 3.24], Gid R M =
c. Now, since R
b is complete and M
c is finitely generated as an R-module,
b
Gid Rb M
the proof
of [6, Proposition 2.2] in conjunction with [5, Corollary 4.4 ] implies that
c = sup{ i | Ext i (E b (R/
b m),
c) 6= 0}.
b M
Gid Rb M
b
R
R
Therefore we can use 3.5 to complete the proof.
Next, we consider the case where M is Artinian. By [15, Lemma 3.6 ] and [1, Exercise
b m)))
b
8.2.4], Gid R (M ) = Gid b (M ) and, by [3, Theorem 4.25], Gfd b (Hom b (M, E b (R/
=
R
R
R
R
Gid Rb (M ), where, for an R-module X, Gfd R (X), denotes the Gorenstein flat dimension of
b m))
b
b is finitely generated as an R-module,
X. Therefore, since Hom Rb (M, ERb (R/
in view of
[3, Theorem 4.24] and [3. Theorem 1.10] we have the first equality in the next display
b m)))
b
Gfd Rb (Hom Rb (M, ERb (R/
b m)),
b 6= 0}
b R)
= sup{ i| Ext iRb (Hom Rb (M, ERb (R/
= sup{ i| Ext iR (ER (k), M ) 6= 0}.
The last equality follows from [10, Theorem 4.3], because ER (k) and M are Artinian.
Lemma 3.7. Let (R, m) be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring and let M be finitely generated.
Suppose that x ∈ m is both R-regular and M -regular. Then the following statements are
equivalent.
(i) Gid R M < ∞.
(ii) Gid R/xR M/xM < ∞.
Furthermore, Gid R/xR M/xM = Gid R M − 1.
Proof. In view of [3, Theorem 3.24], we can assume that R is complete; and hence it admits
a canonical module ωR .
8
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
(i)⇒(ii). It follows from [3, Proposition 3.9] that Gid R M/xM < ∞. Therefore we
can use [4, Proposition 10.4.22], [11, p.140,lemma 2] and [2, Theorem 3.3.5], to see that
Gid R/xR M/xM < ∞.
(ii)⇒(i). By [4, Proposition 10.4.23], M/xM ∈ J0 (R/xR). Since ωR/xR ∼
= ωR /xωR , in
i
R
view of [11, p.140, lemma 2] we have Ext R (ωR , M/xM ) = Tor i (ωR , Hom R (ωR , M/xM )) =
0 for all i > 0 and ωR /xωR ⊗R/xR Hom R (ωR , M/xM ) ∼
= M/xM . Now, using the exact
x
sequence Ext iR (ωR , M ) −→ Ext iR (ωR , M ) −→ Ext iR (ωR , M/xM ) and Nakayama’s lemma,
we deduce that Ext iR (ωR , M ) = 0 for all i > 0. Thus we have the exact sequence
(3.1)
x
0 −→ Hom R (ωR , M ) −→ Hom R (ωR , M ) −→ Hom R (ωR , M/xM ) −→ 0.
Now, we may use (3.1) and similar arguments as above to see that Tor iR (ωR , Hom R (ωR , M )) =
∼ M.
0 for all i > 0. Also, in view of [2, Lemma 3.3.2], we can see that ωR ⊗R Hom R (ωR , M ) =
Therefore by [4, Proposition 10.4.23], Gid R M < ∞. The final assertion is an immediate
consequence of [3, Theorem 3.24].
Theorem 3.8, which is a Gorenstein injective version of 2.5, is one of the main results of
this section. As we will see, this theorem has consequences which recover some interesting
results that have currently been appeared in the literature. Here we adopt the convention
that the Gorenstein injective dimension of the zero module is to be taken as −∞.
Theorem 3.8. Suppose that the local ring (R, m) has a dualizing complex and let n be a
non-negative integer such that Hia (M ) = 0 for all i 6= n.
(i) If Gid R M < ∞, then Gid R Hna (M ) < ∞.
(ii) The converse holds whenever R and M are Cohen-Macaulay.
Furthermore, if M is non-zero finitely generated with finite Gorenstein injective dimension,
then Gid R Hna (M ) = Gid R M − n.
Proof. (i) Notice that if Hna (M ) = 0, then there is nothing to prove. So, we may assume
that Hna (M ) 6= 0. Hence, by [20, Lemma 1.1], we have n ≤ d, where d = Gid R M . Let
d0
d−1
dn−1
d1
dd−1
dn+1
dn
0 −→ M −→ G0 −→ G1 −→ · · · −→ Gn−1 −→ Gn −→ Gn+1 −→ · · · −→ Gd−1 −→ Gd −→ 0
be a Gorenstein injective resolution for M . By applying the functor Γa (−) on this exact
sequence, we obtain the complex
Γa (d−1 )
Γa (d0 )
Γa (d1 )
0 −→ Γa (M ) −→ Γa (G0 ) −→ Γa (G1 ) −→ · · · −→ Γa (Gn−1 )
Γa (dn−1 )
−→
Γa (dn )
Γa (Gn ) −→ Γa (Gn+1 )
Γa (dn+1 )
−→
· · · −→ Γa (Gd−1 )
Γa (dd−1 )
−→
Γa (Gd ) −→ 0
in which, by [15, Theorem 3.2], Γa (Gi ) is Gorenstein injective for all 0 ≤ i ≤ d. If n = 0
the result is clear. So suppose that n > 0. Now, since by [20, Lemma 1.1] each Gi is
Γa -acyclic for all i, we may use [1, Exercise 4.1.2 ] in conjunction with our assumption on
local cohomology modules of M to obtain the following two exact sequences
Γa (d−1 )
Γa (d0 )
0 −→ Γa (M ) −→ Γa (G0 ) −→ · · · −→ Γa (Gn−1 )
and
Γa (dn−1 )
−→
Γa (Gn ) −→
Γa (Gn )
−→ 0
Im Γa (dn−1 )
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
9
0 −→ Im Γa (dn ) = Ker Γa (dn+1 ) ֒→ Γa (Gn+1 ) −→ · · · −→ Γa (Gd−1 ) −→ Γa (Gd ) −→ 0.
But, by assumption, Γa (M ) = 0. Therefore, by using the first above exact sequence and
n
)
[4, Theorem 10.1.4], we see that ImΓΓa (G
is Gorenstein injective. Notice that Hna (M ) =
n−1 )
a (d
n
ker Γa(d )
Im Γ (dn−1 ) . Therefore, patching the second above long exact sequence together with the
a
exact sequence
0 −→ Hna (M ) −→
Γa (Gn )
Γa (Gn )
−→
−→ 0,
Im Γa (dn−1 )
ker Γa (dn )
yields the following long exact sequence
0 −→ Hna (M ) −→
Γa (Gn )
−→ Γa (Gn+1 ) −→ · · · −→ Γa (Gd−1 ) −→ Γa (Gd ) −→ 0.
Im Γa (dn−1 )
Hence, Gid R Hna (M ) ≤ Gid R M − n.
(ii) Suppose that R and M are Cohen-Macaulay. Since H0m (E(R/m)) = E(R/m) and,
for any non-maximal prime ideal p of R, H0m (E(R/p)) = 0, we may apply 2.8 to see that
Him (Hna (M )) = Hn+i
m (M ) for all i ≥ 0. Therefore, we can use the Cohen-Macaulayness of M
to deduce that
Him (Hna (M )) =
0
if i 6= dim M/aM
Hd (M ) if i = dim M/aM,
m
where d = dim M . Hence, by using part(i) for Hna (M ), we have Gid R Hdm (M ) < ∞. Now,
we proceed by induction on d to show that Gid R M is finite. The case d = 0 is clear. Let
d > 0 and assume that the result has been proved for d − 1. Suppose that x ∈ m is both
R-regular and M -regular. Then one can use the induced exact sequence
d
d
0 −→ Hd−1
m (M/xM ) −→ Hm (M ) −→ Hm (M ) −→ 0
and [3, Proposition 3.9] to see that Gid R (Hd−1
m (M/xM )) is finite. Hence, by inductive
hypothesis, Gid R M/xM is finite. Therefore, since, in view of [9, Corollary 6.2], R admits a
canonical module, one can use the same argument as in the proof of 3.7(i)⇒(ii) to deduce
that Gid R/xR M/xM < ∞. Therefore Gid R M is finite by 3.7. Now the result follows by
induction.
For the final assertion, let M be non-zero finitely generated with Gid R M = s < ∞.
Then, by part(i), we have Gid R Hna (M ) ≤ s − n. If Gid R Hna (M ) < s − n, Then, in view
s−n
of [3, Theorem 3.6], we deduce that Ext R
(E(k), Hna (M )) = 0. Hence, by Proposition 2.1,
Ext sR (E(k), M ) = 0 which is a contradiction by 3.6. Therefore, Gid R Hna (M ) = Gid R M −
n.
Let (R, m) be a local ring. As a main theorem, it was proved in [15, Theorem 3.10]
that if R and M are Cohen-Macaulay with dim M = n and Gid R Hnm (M ) < ∞, then
Gid R Hnm (M ) = dim R − n. Notice that if Gid R Hnm (M ) < ∞, then, in view of [15, Lemma
3.6], 3.8(ii) and [3, Theorem 3.24], we have depth R = Gid R M . Therefore, the next corollary,
which is established without the assumption that Gid R Hnm (M ) < ∞, recovers [15, Theorem
3.10]. Another improvement of the above result will be given in 3.12.
10
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
Corollary 3.9. Let (R, m) be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring and let M be Cohen-Macaulay
of dimension n. Then Gid R Hnm (M ) = Gid R M − n.
b is a Cohen-Macaulay R-module
b
of dimension n. By
Proof. First we notice that M ⊗R R
n
b
using [15, Lemma 3.6] and [1, Exercise 8.2.4], we have Gid R H (M ) = Gid b Hnb (M ⊗R R).
m
R
m
c are simultaneously finite. Therefore
Also, in view of [3, Theorem 3.24], Gid R M and Gid Rb M
we may assume that R is complete; and hence it has a dualizing complex. Now, one can use
3.8 to obtain the assertion.
In [21, Theorem 2.6] a characterization of a complete Gorenstein local ring R, in terms of
Gorenstein injectivity of the top local cohomology module of R, is given. The next corollary
together with 2.7 recover that characterization.
Corollary 3.10. Let (R, m) be a Cohen-Macaulay local ring which has a dualizing complex.
Then the following conditions are equivalent.
(i) R is Gorenstein.
(ii) Gid R Hna (R) < ∞ for any ideal a of R such that R is relative Cohen-Macaulay with
respect to a and that ht R a = n.
(iii) Gid R Hna (R) < ∞ for some ideal a of R such that R is relative Cohen-Macaulay with
respect to a and that ht R a = n.
Proof. The implication (i)⇒(ii) follows from 2.7 and the implication (ii)⇒(iii) is clear. The
implication (iii)⇒(i) follows from 3.8(ii) and [3, Proposition 3.11].
Concerning the above corollary, we notice that if Hna (R) is Artinian, then it is not needed
to impose the hypothesis that R has a dualizing complex. Therefore [21, Theorem 2.6]
follows from 3.10 without the completeness assumption on R.
Next, as promised before, we provide examples to show that if M is not finitely generated
or M is not relative Cohen-Macaulay, then 2.5(ii) and 2.5(i), respectively, are no longer true.
Examples 3.11. (i). Let (R, m) be a Gorenstein local ring with dim R ≥ 2 such that
Rp is not regular for some non-maximal prime ideal p of R (for example, one can take
R=
K[[X,Y,Z]]
(X 2 )
and p = (x, y)R, where K is a field). Then one can use [3, Theorem 3.14]
to see that there exists a non-zero Gorenstein injective Rp -module Mp which is neither
injective nor finitely generated. Hence, by [4, Proposition 10.1.2 ], injdimRp Mp = ∞; so
that injdimR Mp = ∞. Now, we notice that, for all x ∈ m − p, injdimR Mx = ∞ because
(Mx )pRx ∼
= Mp . It is easy to check that Him (Mx ) = 0 for all i and that Mx is not finitely
generated as an R-module. Set N = Mx ⊕ ER (k). Then injdimN = ∞, but Γm (N ) is
injective. This example shows that, in 2.5(ii), the finiteness assumption on M is required.
(ii). Let R = k[[x, y]]/(xy), where k is a field. Then R is a 1-dimensional complete
Gorenstein local ring. Let m be the maximal ideal of R and let J = (y)R. In view of [1,
Theorem 8.2.1] and [21, Corollary 2.10], H1J (R) is a non-zero Gorenstein injective R-module.
Note that ΓJ (R) 6= 0. Now, we show that H1J (R) is not injective. If H1J (R) were injective,
then Hom R (H1J (R), ER (R/m)) = Rn for some positive integer n. Therefore, by using [19,
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
11
Theorem 5.11] and [21, Lemma 3.1], we get an R-isomorphism
ψ : Rn = Hom R (H1J (R), ER (R/m)) → Γm,J (R) = J.
Now, ψ(xRn ) = xJ = 0 which is a contradiction. Hence, by [4, Proposition 10.1.2], we have
injdimH1J (R) = ∞. Therefore, by using the exact sequences
0 −→ ΓJ (R) −→ R −→ R/ΓJ (R) −→ 0
and
0 −→ R/ΓJ (R) −→ Ry+(xy) −→ H1J (R) −→ 0,
we achieve injdimΓJ (R) = ∞.
As a mentioned just above 3.9, the next theorem is an improvement of [15, Theorem
3.10]. Indeed, we will use the canonical module of a module to prove the above result
without assuming that R and M are Cohen-Macaulay. Notice that if M is Cohen-Macaulay,
then KM is Cohen-Macaulay. But the converse does not hold in general; see for example
[16, Lemma 1.9] and [16, Theorem 1.14].
Theorem 3.12. Assume that (R, m) is local, and M is non-zero finitely generated of dimension d. Then the following statements hold.
(i) Gid R Hda (M ) = Gpd Rb ΓmR,a
b R
b (KM
c).
d
d
(ii) If KM
c is Cohen-Macaulay and Gid R Hm (M ) < ∞, then Gid R Hm (M ) = depth R−d.
Proof. (i) By [1, Theorem 7.1.6], Hda (M ) is Artinian. Therefore, by use of [1, Theorem
4.3.2] and [19, Theorem 5.11], we have Hda (M ) = 0 if and only if ΓmR,a
b R
b (KM
c) = 0. Hence,
we may assume that Hda (M ) 6= 0. Now, by [15, Lemma 3.6], Gid R Hda (M ) = Gid Rb Hda (M )
and, by [3, Theorem 4.25], Gid Rb Hda (M ) = Gfd Rb Hom Rb (Hda (M ), ER (k)). Therefore, since
b
Hom b (Hd (M ), ER (k)) is finitely generated as an R-module,
one can use [3, Theorem 4.24]
R
a
and [19, Theorem 5.11] to establish the result.
d
(ii) First notice that ΓmR,m
b R
b (KM
b (KM
c) = KM
c. Hence, by part(i), Gid R Hm (M ) = Gpd R
c).
d
b−
Therefore, in view of [3, Proposition 2.16] and [3, Theorem 1.25], Gid R H (M ) = depth R
m
depth KM
c. Now, one can use [16, Lemma 1.9(c)] to complete the proof.
The following corollary is a generalization of the main result [21, Theorem 2.6].
Corollary 3.13. Assume that (R, m) is local with dim R = d and that KRb is CohenMacaulay. Then the following statements are equivalent.
(i) R is Gorenstein.
(ii) injdimR Hdm (R) < ∞.
(iii) Gid R Hdm (R) < ∞.
Proof. The implication (i)⇒(ii) follows from 2.5 while the implication (ii)⇒(iii) is clear.
(iii)⇒(i). By 3.12(ii), we have Gid R Hdm (R) = depth R − dim R; and hence R is CohenMacaulay. Now one can use 3.9 to obtain the assertion.
12
M.R. ZARGAR AND H. ZAKERI
Corollary 3.14. Let (R, m) be local with dim R = d ≤ 2. Then the following statements
are equivalent.
(i) R is Gorenstein.
(ii) Gid R Hdm (R) < ∞.
(iii) Hda (M ) is Gorenstein injective for all finitely generated R–modules M and for all
ideals a of R.
Proof. Let M be a non-zero finitely generated R-module. Then, by [1, Theorem 7.1.6],
Hda (M ) and Hdm (R) are Artinian. Therefore, in view of [15, Lemma 3.5], we may assume
that R is complete. Since, by [16, Lemma 1.9], KR is Cohen-Macaulay, (i)⇔(ii) follows
immediately from 3.13. The implication (iii)⇒(i) is clear and the implication (i)⇒(iii)
follows from [21, Corollary 2.10].
Acknowledgements. The authors would like to thank Alberto Fernandez Boix and the
referee for careful reading of manuscript and helpful comments.
References
[1] M.P. Brodmann and R.Y. Sharp, Local cohomology: An algebraic introduction with geometric applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[2] W. Bruns and J. Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay rings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993.
[3] L.W. Christensen, H-B. Foxby, and H. Holm, Beyond totally reflexive modules and back, In: Noetherian
and Non-Noetherian Perspectives, edited by M. Fontana, S-E. Kabbaj, B. Olberding and I. Swanson,
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, New York, 2011, 101–143.
[4] E.E. Enochs and O.M.G. Jenda, Relative homological algebra, de Gruyter, Berlin, 2000.
[5] E.E. Enochs and O.M.G. Jenda, Gorenstein injective dimension and Tor-depth of modules, Arch. Math,
72 (1999) 107–117.
[6] R. Fossum, H-B. Foxby, P. Griffith and I. Reiten, Minimal injective resolutions with applications to
dualizing modules and Gorenstein modules, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S, 45 (1975) 193–215.
[7] M. Hellus and P. Schenzel, On cohomologically complete intersections, Journal of Algebra, 320 (2008)
3733–3748.
[8] M. Jahangiri, and A. Rahimi, Relative Cohen-Macaulayness and relative unmixedness of bigraded
modules, to appear in Commutative Algebra.
[9] T. Kawasaki, On Macaulayfication of Noetherian schemes, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 352 (2000) 2517–
2552.
[10] B. Kubik, M.J. Leamerb and S. Wagstaff, Homology of artinian and Matlis reflexive modules, I, J. Pure
Appl. Algebra, 215 (2011) 2486–2503.
[11] H. Matsumura, Commutative ring theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
[12] C. Peskine and L. Szpiro, Dimension projective finie et cohomologie locale, Publ. Math. I.H.E.S. 42
(1973) 47–119.
[13] P. Roberts, Le theoreme d’intersection, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. I, 304 (1987) 177–180.
[14] J.J. Rotman, An introduction to homological algebra, Second ed., Springer, New York, 2009.
[15] R. Sazeedeh, Gorenstein injective of the section functor, Forum Mathematicum, 22 (2010) 1117–1127.
[16] P. Schenzel, On the use of local cohomoloy in algebra and geometry, in: Lectures at the Summmer
school of Commutative Algebra and Algebraic Geometry, Birkhä, Basel, Ballaterra, 1996.
[17] R.Y. Sharp, Steps in commutative algebra, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2000.
INJECTIVE AND GORENSTEIN INJECTIVE DIMENSIONS
13
[18] R.Y. Sharp, Gorenstein Modules, Mathematische Zeitschrift, 115 (1970) 117–139.
[19] R. Takahashi, Y. Yoshino and T. Yoshizawa, Local cohomology based on a nonclosed support defined
by a pair of ideals, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 213 (2009) 582–600.
[20] S. Yassemi, A generalization of a theorem of Bass, Comm. Algebra, 35 (2007) 249–251.
[21] T. Yoshizawa, On Gorenstein injective of top local cohomology modules, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc, 140
(2012) 1897–1907.
M.R. Zargar and H. Zakeri, Faculty of mathematical sciences and computer, Kharazmi University, 599 Taleghani Avenue, Tehran 15618, Iran
E-mail address: [email protected]
E-mail address: [email protected]
M.R. Zargar, School of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM),
P.O. Box 19395–5746, Tehran, Iran.
| 0math.AC
|
Distributed Compression of Graphical Data
Payam Delgosha and Venkat Anantharam
arXiv:1802.07446v1 [cs.IT] 21 Feb 2018
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences
University of California, Berkeley
{pdelgosha, ananth} @ berkeley.edu
February 22, 2018
Abstract
In contrast to time series, graphical data is data indexed by the nodes and edges of a graph.
Modern applications such as the internet, social networks, genomics and proteomics generate
graphical data, often at large scale. The large scale argues for the need to compress such data for
storage and subsequent processing. Since this data might have several components available in
different locations, it is also important to study distributed compression of graphical data. In this
paper, we derive a rate region for this problem which is a counterpart of the Slepian–Wolf Theorem.
We characterize the rate region when the statistical description of the distributed graphical data
is one of two types – a marked sparse Erdős–Rényi ensemble or a marked configuration model.
Our results are in terms of a generalization of the notion of entropy introduced by Bordenave and
Caputo in the study of local weak limits of sparse graphs.
1
Introduction
Nowadays, storing combinatorically structured data is of great importance in many applications such
as the internet, social networks and biological data. For instance, a social network could be presented
as a graph where each node models an individual and each edge stands for a friendship. Also, vertices
and edges can carry marks, e.g. the mark of a vertex represents its type, and the mark of an edge
represents its shared information. Due to the sheer amount of such data, compressing it has drawn
attention, see e.g. [CS12], [Abb16], [DA17]. As the data is not always available in one location, it is
important to also consider distributed compression of graphical data.
Traditionally, distributed lossless compression is modeled using two (or more) correlated stationary
and ergodic processes representing the components of the data at the individual locations. In this
case, the rate region is given by the Slepian–Wolf Theorem [CT12]. We adopt an analogous framework,
namely that two correlated marked random graphs on the same vertex set are presented to two encoders
which then individually compress their data such that a third party can recover both realizations from
the two compressed representations, with a vanishing probability of error in the asymptotic limit of
data size.
We characterize the compression rate region for two scenarios, namely, a marked sparse Erdős–Rényi
ensemble and a marked configuration model. We employ the framework of local weak convergence, also
called the objective method, as a counterpart for marked graphs of the notion of stochastic processes
[BS01, AS04, AL07]. Our characterization is best understood in terms of a generalization of a measure
of entropy introduced by Bordenave and Caputo, which we call the BC entropy [BC14]. It turns out
that the BC entropy captures the per–vertex growth rate of the Shannon entropy for the ensembles
1
we study in this paper. This motivates it as a natural measure governing the asymptotic compression
bounds.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce the notation and formally state the
problem. Sections 3 and 4 give a brief introduction to the objective method and the BC entropy,
mostly specialized for the examples we study. Finally, in Section 5, we characterize the rate region for
the scenarios we present in Section 2.
2
Notations and Problem Statement
The set of real numbers is denoted by R. For an integer n, [n] denotes the set {1, 2, . . . , n}. For a
probability distribution P , H(P ) denotes its Shannon entropy. Also, for a random variable X, we
denote by H(X) its P
Shannon entropy. For a positive integer N and a sequence of positive integers
{ai }1≤i≤k such that
ai ≤ N , we define
N
N!
:=
.
{ai }1≤i≤k
a1 ! . . . ak !(N − a1 − · · · − ak )!
For sequences of reals an and bn we write an = O(bn ) if, for some constant C ≥ 0, we have |an | ≤ C|bn |
for n large enough. Furthermore, we write an = o(bn ) if an /bn → 0 as n → ∞. We denote by 1 [A] the
indicator of the event A. For a probability distribution P , X ∼ P denotes that the random variable
X has law P . Throughout the paper logarithms are to the natural base.
A marked graph with edge mark set Ξ and vertex mark set Θ is a graph where each edge carries a
mark in Ξ and each vertex carries a mark in Θ. We assume that all graphs are simple unless otherwise
stated. Also, we assume that all edge and vertex mark sets are finite. For two vertices v and w in a
graph G, v ∼G w denotes that v and w are adjacent in G.
Let G be a marked graph on a finite vertex set with edges and vertices carrying marks in the sets Ξ
and Θ, respectively. We denote the edge mark count vector of G by m
~ G = {mG (x)}x∈Ξ , where mG (x)
is the number of edges in G carrying mark x. Furthermore, we denote the vertex mark count vector of
G by ~uG = {uG (θ)}θ∈Θ , where uG (θ) denotes the number of vertices in G with mark θ. Additionally,
−
→
for a graph G on the vertex set [n], we denote the degree sequence of G by dgG = {dgG (1), . . . , dgG (n)}
where dgG (i) denotes the degree of vertex i. For a degree sequence d~ = (d(1), . . . , d(n)) and an integer
k, we define
~ := |{1 ≤ i ≤ n : d(i) = k}.
ck (d)
(1)
Also, for two degree sequences d~ = (d(1), . . . , d(n)) and d~′ = (d′ (1), . . . , d′ (n)), and two integers k and
l, we define
~ d~′ ) := |{1 ≤ i ≤ n : d(i) = k, d′ (i) = l}|.
ck,l (d,
(2)
(n)
Given a degree sequence d~ = (d(1), . . . , d(n)), we let G ~ denote the set of simple unmarked graphs G
d
on the vertex set [n] such that dgG (i) = d(i) for 1 ≤ i ≤ n.
Throughout this paper, we assume that Ξ1 and Ξ2 are two fixed and finite sets of edge marks.
Moreover, Θ1 and Θ2 are two fixed and finite vertex mark sets. For i ∈ {1, 2} and an integer n, let
(n)
Gi be the set of marked graphs on the vertex set [n] with edge and vertex mark sets Ξi and Θi ,
(n)
(n)
respectively. For two graphs G1 ∈ G1 and G2 ∈ G2 , G1 ⊕ G2 denotes the superposition of G1 and
G2 which is a marked graph defined as follows: a vertex 1 ≤ v ≤ n in G1 ⊕ G2 carries the mark (θ1 , θ2 )
where θi is the mark of v in Gi . Furthermore, we place an edge in G1 ⊕ G2 between vertices v and w
if there is an edge between them in at least one of G1 of G2 , and mark this edge (x1 , x2 ), where, for
1 ≤ i ≤ 2, xi is the mark of the edge (v, w) in Gi if it exists and ◦i otherwise. Here ◦1 and ◦2 are
auxiliary marks not present in Ξ1 ∪ Ξ2 . Note that G1 ⊕ G2 is a marked graph with edge and vertex
2
mark sets Ξ1,2 := (Ξ1 ∪ {◦1 }) × (Ξ2 ∪ {◦2 }) \ {(◦1 , ◦2 )} and Θ1,2 := Θ1 × Θ2 , respectively. We use the
terminology jointly marked graph to refer to a marked graph with edge and vertex makr sets Ξ1,2 and
(n)
Θ1,2 respectively. With this, let G1,2 denote the set of jointly marked graphs on the vertex set [n].
Moreover, for i ∈ {1, 2}, we say that a graph is in the i–th domain if edge and vertex marks come from
Ξi and Θi , respectively. For a jointly marked graph G1,2 and 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, the i–th marginal of G1,2 ,
denoted by Gi , is the marked graph in the i–th domain obtained by projecting all vertex and edge
marks onto Ξi and Θi , respectively, followed by removing edges with mark ◦i . Note that any jointly
marked graph G1,2 is uniquely determined by its marginals G1 and G2 , because G1,2 = G1 ⊕ G2 . Given
an edge mark count m
~ = {m(x)}x∈Ξ1,2 , for x1 ∈ Ξ1 ∪ {◦1 }, with an abuse of notation we define
X
m(x1 ) :=
(x′1 ,x′2 )∈Ξ1,2
m((x′1 , x′2 )).
(3)
: x′1 =x1
In a similar fashion, we define m(x2 ) for x2 ∈ Ξ2 ∪ {◦2 }. Likewise, given a vertex mark count vector
~u = {u(θ)}θ∈Θ1,2 , and for θ1 ∈ Θ1 and θ2 ∈ Θ2 , we define
u(θ1 ) =
X
u((θ1 , θ2′ ))
u(θ2 ) =
X
u((θ1′ , θ2 )).
(4)
θ1′ ∈Θ1
θ2′ ∈Θ2
(n)
(n)
Assume that we have a sequence of random graphs G1,2 ∈ G1,2 , drawn according to some ensemble
distribution. Additionally, assume that there are two encoders who want to compress realizations of
such jointly marked graphs in a distributed fashion. Namely, the i–th encoder, 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, has only
(n)
(n)
access to the i–th marginal Gi . We assume that the encoders know the distribution of G1,2 .
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
Definition 1. An hn, L1 , L2 i code is a tuple of functions (f1 , f2 , g (n) ) for each n such that
(n)
fi
(n)
: Gi
and
(n)
→ [Li ]
(n)
(n)
i ∈ {1, 2},
(n)
g (n) : [L1 ] × [L2 ] → G1,2 .
(n)
(n)
The probability of error for this code corresponding to the ensemble of G1,2 , which is denoted by Pe ,
is defined as
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
Pe(n) := P g (n) (f1 (G1 ), f2 (G2 )) 6= G1,2 .
Now we define our achievability criterion.
Definition 2. A rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) ∈ R4 is said to be achievable for the above scenario if there
(n)
(n)
is a sequence of hn, L1 , L2 i codes such that
(n)
lim sup
n→∞
log Li
− (αi n log n + Ri n)
≤0
n
i ∈ {1, 2},
(5)
(n)
and also Pe → 0. The rate region R ∈ R4 is defined as follows: for fixed α1 and α2 , if there are
(m)
(m)
sequences R1 and R2 with limit points R1 and R2 in R, respectively, such that for each m, the
(m)
(m)
rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) is achievable, then we include (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) in the set R.
In this paper, we characterize the above rate region for the following two sequences of ensembles:
3
The Erdős–Rényi ensemble: Assume that nonnegative real numbers ~p = {px }x∈Ξ1,2 together
with a probability distribution ~
q = {qθ }θ∈Θ1,2 are given such that for all x1 ∈ Ξ1 ∪ {◦1 } and x2 ∈
Ξ2 ∪ {◦2 }, we have
X
X
p(x′1 ,x′2 ) > 0.
(6)
p(x′1 ,x′2 ) > 0
and
(x′ ,x′ )∈Ξ1,2
1 2
x′2 =x2
(x′ ,x′ )∈Ξ1,2
1 2
x′1 =x1
(n)
For an integer n large enough, we define the probability distribution G(n; p~, ~q) on G1,2 as follows: for
each pair of vertices 1 ≤ i < j ≤ n, the edge (i, j) is present
Pin the graph and has mark x ∈ Ξ1,2 with
probability px /n, and is not present with probability 1 − x∈Ξ1,2 px /n. Furthermore, each vertex in
the graph is given a mark θ ∈ Θ1,2 with probability qθ . The choice of edge and vertex marks is done
independently.
The configuration model ensemble: Assume that a fixed integer ∆ > 0 and a probability
distribution ~r = {rk }∆
k=0 supported on the set {0, . . . , ∆} are given, such that r0 < 1. Moreover,
assume that probability distributions ~γ = {γx }x∈Ξ1,2 and ~q = {qθ }θ∈Θ1,2 on the sets Ξ1,2 and Θ1,2 ,
respectively, are given. We assume that for all x1 ∈ Ξ1 ∪ {◦1 } and x2 ∈ Ξ2 ∪ {◦2 }, we have
X
X
γ(x′1 ,x′2 ) > 0.
(7)
γ(x′1 ,x′2 ) > 0
and
(x′1 ,x′2 )∈Ξ1,2
x′2 =x2
(x′1 ,x′2 )∈Ξ1,2
x′1 =x1
Furthermore, let d~(n) = {d(n) (1), . . . , d(n) (n)} be P
a sequence of degree sequences such
Pnthat for all n
n
and 1 ≤ i ≤ n, we have d(n) (i) ≤ ∆ and also i=1 d(n) (i) is even. Let mn := ( i=1 d(n) (i))/2.
Additionally, if for 0 ≤ k ≤ ∆, ck (d~(n) ) denotes the number of 1 ≤ i ≤ n such that d(n) (i) = k, we
assume that for some constant K > 0,
∆
X
|ck (d~(n) ) − nrk | ≤ Kn1/2 .
(8)
k=0
(n)
Now, we define the law G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~
q ) on G1,2 for n large enough as follows. First, we pick an unmarked
graph on the vertex set [n] uniformly at random among the set of graphs G with maximum degree ∆
−
→
such that for each 0 ≤ k ≤ ∆, ck (dgG ) = ck (d~(n) ).1 Then, we assign i.i.d. marks with law ~γ on the
edges and i.i.d. marks with law ~q on the vertices.
As we will discuss in Section 3 below, the sequence of Erdős–Rényi ensembles defined above converges in the local weak sense to a marked Poisson Galton Watson tree. Moreover, the configuration
model ensemble converges in the same sense to a marked Galton Watson process with degree distribution ~r. We will characterize the achievability rate regions in Section 5 in terms of these limiting
objects for the above two sequences of ensembles. This will turn out to be best understood in terms
of a measure of entropy discussed in Section 4 below.
3
The framework of Local Weak Convergence
In this section, we discuss the framework of local weak convergence mainly in the context of the Erdős–
Rényi and configuration model ensembles discussed in Section 2. For a general discussion, the reader
is referred to [BS01, AS04, AL07].
1 The fact that each degree is bounded to ∆, r < 1 and the sum of degrees is even implies that d
~(n) is a graphic
0
sequence for n large enough. This is, for instance, a consequence of Theorem 4.5 in [BC14].
4
Let Ξ and Θ be finite mark sets. A marked graph G with edge and vertex mark sets Ξ and Θ
respectively together with a distinguished vertex o, is called a rooted marked graph and is denoted
by (G, o). For a rooted marked graph (G, o) and integer h ≥ 1, (G, o)h denotes the h neighborhood
of o, i.e. the subgraph consisting of vertices with distance no more than h from o. Note that (G, o)h
is connected by definition. Two connected rooted marked graphs (G1 , o1 ) and (G2 , o2 ) are said to
be isomorphic if there is a vertex bijection between the two graphs that maps o1 to o2 , preserves
adjacencies and also preserves vertex and edge marks. With this, we denote the isomorphism class
corresponding to a rooted marked graph (G, o) by [G, o]. We simply use [G, o]h as a shorthand for
[(G, o)h ]. Let G∗ (Ξ, Θ) denote the set of isomorphism classes [G, o] of connected rooted marked graphs
on a countable vertex set with edge and vertex marks coming from the sets Ξ and Θ, respectively. It
can be shown that G∗ (Ξ, Θ) can be turned into a separable and complete metric space [AL07]. For a
probability distribution µ on G∗ (Ξ, Θ), let deg(µ) denote the expected degree at the root in µ.
For a finite marked graph G and a vertex v in G, let G(v) denote the connected component of v.
With this, if v is a vertex chosen uniformly at random in G, we define U (G) be the law of [G(v), v],
which is a probability distribution on G∗ (Ξ, Θ).
(n)
Let G1,2 be a random jointly marked graph with law G(n; p~, ~q) and let vn be a vertex chosen
uniformly at random in the set [n]. A simple Poisson approximation implies that Dx (vn ), the number
of edges adjacent to vn with mark x ∈ Ξ1,2 , converges in distribution to a Poisson random variables
with mean px as n goes to infinity. Moreover, {Dx (vn )}x∈Ξ1,2 are asymptotically mutually independent.
A similar argument can be repeated for any other vertex in the neighborhood of vn . Also, it can be
(n)
shown that the probability of having cycles converges to zero. In fact, the structure of (G1,2 , vn )h
converges in distribution to a rooted marked Poisson Galton Watson tree with depth h.
ER
More precisely, let (T1,2
, o) be a rooted jointly marked tree defined as follows. First, the mark of
the root is chosen from distribution ~
q . Then, for x ∈ Ξ1,2 , we independently generate Dx with law
Poisson(px ). We then add Dx many edges with mark x to the root o. For each offspring, we repeat the
same procedure independently, i.e. choose its mark and edges with each mark from the corresponding
ER
Poisson distribution. Recursively repeating this, we get a connected jointly marked tree T1,2
rooted at
ER
o, which has possibly countably infinitely many vertices. Let µ1,2 denote the law of the isomorphism
ER
class [T1,2
, o]. Note that µER
1,2 is a probability distribution on G∗ (Ξ1,2 , Θ1,2 ). The above discussion
(n)
ER
implies that [G1,2 , vn ]h converges in distribution to [T1,2
, o]h . In fact, even a stronger statement can
(n)
be proved. More precisely, if we consider the sequence of random graphs G1,2 independently on a
(n)
joint probability space, U (G1,2 ) converges weakly to µER
1,2 with probability one. With this, we say
(n)
that, almost surely, µER
1,2 is the local weak limit of the sequence G1,2 , where the term “local” stands for
looking at a fixed depth neighborhood of a typical node.
ER
With the above construction, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, let TiER be the i–th marginal of T1,2
. Moreover, let
ER
ER
ER
µi be the law of [Ti (o), o]. Therefore, µi is a probability distribution on G∗ (Ξi , Θi ). Similarly,
(n)
one can see that, almost surely, µER
is the local weak limit of the sequence Gi .
i
CM
A similar picture also holds for the configuration model. More precisely, let (T1,2
, o) be a rooted
jointly marked random tree constructed as follows. First, we generate the degree of the root with
law ~r. Then, for each offspring w of o, we independently generate the offspring count of w with law
r~′ = {rk′ }∆−1
k=0 defined as
(k + 1)rk+1
,
0 ≤ k ≤ ∆ − 1,
rk′ =
E [X]
where X has law ~r. We continue this process recursively, i.e. for each vertex other than the root, we
independently generate its offspring count with law r′ . The distribution ~r′ is called the sized biased
distribution, and takes into account the fact that each node other than the root has an extra edge on
5
top of it, and hence its degree should be biased in order to get the correct degree distribution ~r. Then,
CM
for each vertex and edge existing in the graph T1,2
, we generate marks independently with laws ~q
CM
CM
and ~γ , respectively. Let µ1,2 be the law of [T1,2 , o]. Moreover, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, let µCM
be the law of
i
(n)
CM
(n)
CM
~
[T (o), o]. It can be shown that if G
has law G(n; d , ~γ , ~q) then, almost surely, µ
is the local
i
1,2
1,2
(n)
G1,2 ,
(n)
Gi ,
µCM
i
for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2.
weak limit of
and
is the local weak limit of
Given Ξ and Θ, not all probability distributions on G∗ (Ξ, Θ) can appear as the local weak limit of
a sequence. In fact, the condition that all vertices have the same chance of being chosen as the root
for a finite graph manifests itself as a certain stationarity condition at the limit called unimodularity
[AL07].
4
The BC entropy
In this section, we discuss a notion of entropy for probability distributions on a space of rooted marked
graphs. This is a marked version of the entropy defined by Bordenave and Caputo in [BC14], which
was defined for probability distributions on the space of rooted (unmarked) graphs. To distinguish it
from the Shannon entropy, we call this notion of entropy the BC entropy.
Let Ξ and Θ be finite mark sets and let µ be a probability distribution on G∗ (Ξ, Θ). Moreover,
let m
~ (n) and ~u(n) be sequences of edge and vertex mark counts, respectively, such that for all x ∈ Ξ,
(n)
2m (x)/n converges to the expected number of edges with mark x connected to the root in µ, and
for all θ ∈ Θ, u(n) (θ)/n converges to the probability of the mark of the root in µ being θ. Let
(n)
Gm
(µ, ǫ) be the set of graphs G on the vertex set [n] with edge and vertex marks in Ξ and Θ,
~ (n) ,~
u(n)
respectively, such that m
~G =m
~ (n) , ~uG = ~u(n) , and U (G) is in the ball around µ with radius ǫ with
respect to the Lévy–Prokhorov distance [Bil13].
P
Definition 3. If an := x∈Ξ m(n) (x), define
(n)
Σ(µ, ǫ) := lim sup
(µ, ǫ)| − an log n
log |Gm
~ (n) ,~
u(n)
n
n→∞
Σ(µ, ǫ) := lim inf
(n)
(µ, ǫ)|
log |Gm
~ (n) ,~
u(n)
− an log n
n
n→∞
Note that both Σ(µ, ǫ) and Σ(µ, ǫ) decrease as ǫ decreases. Therefore, we may define the upper and
lower BC entropies as Σ(µ) := limǫ↓0 Σ(µ, ǫ) and Σ(µ) := limǫ↓0 Σ(µ, ǫ). If Σ(µ) = Σ(µ), we denote
the common value by Σ(µ) and call it the BC entropy of µ.
Using similar techniques as in the proof of Theorem 1.2 in [BC14], one can show that Σ(µ) and
~ (n) and ~u(n) , and Σ(µ) = Σ(µ) for all µ
Σ(µ) do not depend on the specific choice of the sequences m
with positive expected degree of the root.
Now, we connect the asymptotic behavior of the entropy of the ensembles defined in Section 2 to
(n)
ER
ER
the
P BC entropy of their local weak limits. Assume that G1,2 has law G(n; p~, ~q). Let d1,2 := deg(µ1,2 ) =
x∈Ξ1,2 px . Moreover, we use the following notational conventions for xi ∈ Ξi and θi ∈ Θi , 1 ≤ i ≤ 2.
px1 :=
X
p(x1 ,x′2 )
px2 :=
x′2 ∈Ξ2 ∪{◦2 }
qθ1 :=
X
X
p(x′1 ,x2 )
x′1 ∈Ξ1 ∪{◦1 }
qθ2 :=
q(θ1 ,θ2′ )
X
θ1′ ∈Θ1
θ2′ ∈Θ2
6
q(θ1′ ,θ2 )
(9)
P
q , it can be easily verified
For 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, let dER
:= deg(µER
i
i ) =
xi ∈Ξi pxi . If Q = (Q1 , Q2 ) has law ~
that with s(x) defined as x2 − x2 log x for x > 0 and zero for x = 0, we have
ER
X
d
1,2
(n)
n log n + n H(Q) +
s(px ) + o(n)
H(G1,2 ) =
2
x∈Ξ1,2
!
X
dER
(n)
1
s(px1 ) + o(n)
H(G1 ) =
n log n + n H(Q1 ) +
2
x1 ∈Ξ1
!
X
dER
(n)
2
n log n + n H(Q2 ) +
H(G2 ) =
s(px2 ) + o(n)
2
x ∈Ξ
2
(10a)
(10b)
(10c)
2
Using a generalization of Theorem 1.3 in [BC14], it can be seen that the coefficient of n in the above
ER
ER
3 equations are Σ(µER
1,2 ), Σ(µ1 ) and Σ(µ2 ), respectively.
(n)
Similarly, for the configuration model, let G
be distributed according to G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~q) and let
1,2
X be a random variable with law ~r. Moreover, let Γk = (Γk1 , Γk2 ), 1 ≤ k ≤ ∆, be an i.i.d. sequence
distributed according to ~γ . With this, let
X1 :=
X
X
1 Γk1 6= ◦1
k=1
X2 :=
X
X
1 Γk2 6= ◦2 .
(11)
k=1
Note that for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, Xi is basically the distribution of the degree of the root in µCM
. If dCM
1,2 :=
i
CM
CM
CM
deg(µ1,2 ) and, for 1 ≤ i ≤ 2, di := deg(µi ), it can be seen that (see Appendix A for the details)
dCM
1,2
n log n + n − s(dCM
1,2 ) + H(X) − E [log X!]
2
dCM
1,2
H(Γ) + o(n)
+ H(Q) +
2
CM
d
(n)
H(G1 ) = 1 n log n + n − s(dCM
1 ) + H(X1 ) − E [log X1 !]
2
dCM
+ H(Q1 ) + 1 H(Γ1 |Γ1 6= ◦1 ) + o(n)
2
dCM
(n)
H(G2 ) = 2 n log n + n − s(dCM
2 ) + H(X2 ) − E [log X2 !]
2
dCM
+ H(Q2 ) + 2 H(Γ2 |Γ2 6= ◦2 ) + o(n)
2
(n)
H(G1,2 ) =
(12a)
(12b)
(12c)
CM
CM
Also, it can be seen that the coefficients of n in the above equations are Σ(µCM
1,2 ), Σ(µ1 ) and Σ(µ2 ),
respectively.
CM
If µ1,2 is any of the two distributions µER
1,2 or µ1,2 , and µ1 and µ2 are its marginals, we define the
conditional BC entropies as Σ(µ2 |µ1 ) := Σ(µ1,2 ) − Σ(µ1 ) and Σ(µ1 |µ2 ) := Σ(µ1,2 ) − Σ(µ2 ).
5
Main Results
Now, we are ready to state our main result, which is to characterize the rate region in Definition 2.
In the following, for pairs of reals (α, R) and (α′ , R′ ), we write (α, R) ≻ (α′ , R′ ) if either α > α′ , or
α = α′ and R > R′ . We also write (α, R) (α′ , R′ ) if either (α, R) ≻ (α′ , R′ ) or (α, R) = (α′ , R′ ).
7
CM
Theorem 1. Assume µ1,2 is either of the two distributions µER
1,2 or µ1,2 defined in Section 4. Then,
if R is the rate region for the sequence of ensembles corresponding to µ1,2 defined in Section 2, a rate
tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) ∈ R if and only if
(α1 , R1 ) ((d1,2 − d2 )/2, Σ(µ1 |µ2 ))
(13a)
(α2 , R2 ) ((d1,2 − d1 )/2, Σ(µ2 |µ1 ))
(13b)
(α1 + α2 , R1 + R2 ) (d1,2 /2, Σ(µ1,2 ))
(13c)
where d1,2 = deg(µ1,2 ), d1 = deg(µ1 ) and d2 = deg(µ2 ).
We prove the achievability for the Erdős–Rényi case and the configuration model in Sections 5.1
and 5.2, respectively. Afterwards, we prove the converse for the two cases in Sections 5.3 and 5.4,
respectively. Before this, we state the following general lemma used in the proofs, whose proof is
straightforward using Stirling’s approximation.
Lemma 1. Assume that a positive integer k and sequences of integers an and bn1 , . . . , bnk are given.
Pk
1. If an /n → a > 0 and for each 1 ≤ i ≤ k, bni /n → bi ≥ 0 where a = i=1 bi , we have
!
bi
an
1
.
= aH
log
lim
n→∞ n
a 1≤i≤k
{bni }1≤i≤k
2. If an /
n
2
→ 1 and bni /n → bi ≥ 0, we have
an
{bn
i }1≤i≤k
log
lim
n→∞
where s(x) is defined to be
5.1
x
2
−
x
2
−
P
k
n
i=1 bi
n
log n
=
k
X
s(2bi ),
i=1
log x for x > 0 and 0 if x = 0.
Proof of Achievability for the Erdős–Rényi case
Here we show that a rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) is achievable for the Erdős–Rényi ensemble if it satisfies
the following
ER
ER ER
(α1 , R1 ) ≻ ((dER
1,2 − d2 )/2, Σ(µ1 |µ2 ))
(14a)
ER
ER ER
((dER
1,2 − d1 )/2, Σ(µ2 |µ1 ))
ER
(dER
1,2 /2, Σ(µ1,2 ))
(14b)
(α2 , R2 ) ≻
(α1 + α2 , R1 + R2 ) ≻
(14c)
Note that if a rate tuple (α′1 , R1′ , α′2 , R2′ ) satisfies the weak inequalities (13a)–(13c) then, for any ǫ > 0,
(α′1 , R1′ + ǫ, α′2 , R2′ + ǫ) satisfies the above strict inequalities. As we show below, this implies that
(α′1 , R1′ + ǫ, α′2 , R2′ + ǫ) is achievable. Hence, after sending ǫ → 0, we get (α′1 , R1′ , α′2 , R2′ ) ∈ R.
We show that any (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) satisfying (14a)–(14c) is achievable by employing a random
(n)
binning method. More precisely, for i ∈ {1, 2}, we set Li = ⌊exp(αi n log n + Ri n)⌋ and for each
(n)
(n)
(n)
Gi ∈ Gi , we assign fi (Gi ) uniformly at random in the set [Li ] and independent of everything
else.
To describe our decoding scheme, we first need to define some notation. Let M(n) denote the set
of edge count vectors m
~ = {m(x)}x∈Ξ1,2 such that
X
|m(x) − npx /2| ≤ n2/3 .
x∈Ξ1,2
8
Moreover, let U (n) denote the set of vertex mark count vectors ~u = {u(θ)}θ∈Θ1,2 such that
X
|u(θ) − nqθ | ≤ n2/3 .
θ∈Θ1,2
(n)
(n)
(n)
Furthermore, we define Gp~,~q to be the set of graphs H1,2 ∈ G1,2 such that m
~ H (n) ∈ M(n) and
1,2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
~uH (n) ∈ U (n) . Upon receiving (i, j) ∈ [L1 ] × [L2 ], we form the set of graphs H1,2 ∈ Gp~,~q such that
1,2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
f1 (H1 ) = i and f2 (H2 ) = j, where H1 and H2 are the marginals of H1,2 . If this set has
only one element, we output this element as the decoded graph; otherwise, we report an error.
(n)
In what follows, assume that G1,2 is a random graph with law G(n; p~, ~q). We consider the following
four error events corresponding to the above scheme
(n)
:= {G1,2 ∈
/ Gp~,~q },
(n)
:= {∃H1,2 6= G1,2 : fi (Hi ) = fi (Gi ), i ∈ {1, 2}},
(n)
:= {∃H2
(n)
:= {∃H1
E1
E2
E3
E4
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
6= G2
(n)
6= G1
(n)
(n)
: G1 ⊕ H2
(n)
: H1
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
∈ Gp~,~q , f2 (H2 ) = f2 (G2 )},
(n)
∈ Gp~,~q , f1 (H1 ) = f1 (G1 )}.
⊕ G2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
Note that outside the above four events, the decoder successfully decodes the input graph G1,2 .
(n)
P(E1 )
Using Chebyshev’s inequality, for some κ > 0 we have
as n goes to infinity. Moreover, using the union bound, we have
≤ κn−1/3 , which converges to zero
(n)
(n)
≤
P E2
|Gp~,~q |
(n)
(n)
L1 L2
.
(15)
(n)
(n)
~ H (n) and ~uH (n) are in the sets M(n) and
Note that for each graph H1,2 ∈ Gp~,~q , the mark count vectors m
1,2
1,2
U (n) , respectively. Additionally, we have |M(n) | ≤ (2n2/3 )|Ξ1,2 | and |U (n) | ≤ (2n2/3 )|Θ1,2 | . Therefore,
(n)
|Gp~,~q | ≤ (2n2/3 )(|Ξ1,2 |+|Θ1,2 |) max A1 (m,
~ ~u),
(16)
(n)
m∈M
~
u
~ ∈U (n)
where
A1 (m,
~ ~u) :=
n
{u(θ)}θ∈Θ1,2
!
n
2
{m(x)}x∈Ξ1,2
!
.
Now, let m
~ (n) and ~u(n) be sequences in M(n) and U (n) , respectively. Then, for all x ∈ Ξ1,2 and
θ ∈ Θ1,2 , we have m(n) (x)/n → px /2 and u(n) (θ)/n → qθ . Thereby, using Lemma 1, we have
P
log A1 (m
~ (n) , ~u(n) ) − ( x∈Ξ1,2 m(n) (x)) log n
lim
n→∞
n
X
= H(~q) +
s(px ) = Σ(µER
1,2 ).
x∈Ξ1,2
Substituting this into (16) and using the fact that |m(n) (x) − npx /2| ≤ n2/3 , we have
(n)
lim
n→∞
log |Gp~,~q | − n
dER
1,2
2
n
9
log n
= Σ(µER
1,2 ).
(17)
Substituting this into (15), we have
lim sup
1
(n)
log P E2
n
(n)
≤ lim sup
log |Gp~,~q | − n
dER
1,2
2
log n − nΣ(µER
1,2 )
n
dER
n( 1,2
2
− α1 − α2 ) log n + n(Σ(µER
1,2 ) − R1 − R2 )
n
(n) (n)
n(α1 + α2 ) log n + n(R1 + R2 ) − log L1 L2
.
+ lim sup
n
+ lim sup
The first term is nonpositive due to (17), the second term is strictly negative due to the assumption
(n)
(n)
(14c), and the third term is nonpositive due to our choice of L1 and L2 . Consequently, the RHS is
(n)
strictly negative, which implies that P(E2 ) → 0.
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
Now, we show that P(E3 \ E1 ) vanishes. In order to do so, for H1 ∈ G1 , define S2 (H1 ) :=
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
{H2 ∈ G2 : H1 ⊕ H2 ∈ Gp~,~q }. Using the union bound, we have
(n)
(n)
≤
P E3 \ E1
≤
X
(n)
(n)
(n)
P(G1,2 = H1,2 )
(n)
(n)
L2
(n)
H1,2 ∈Gp
~,~
q
1
(n)
L2
max
(n)
(n)
H1,2 ∈Gp
~,~
q
(n)
|S2 (H1 )|
(18)
(n)
(n)
|S2 (H1 )|.
It can be shown that (See Appendix B)
max
(n)
lim sup
(n)
(n)
H1,2 ∈Gp
~,~
q
(n)
ER
dER
1,2 − d1
log n
2
n
n→∞
where H1
(n)
log |S2 (H1 )| − n
(19)
ER
≤ Σ(µER
2 |µ1 ),
(n)
is the first marginal of H1,2 . Substituting in (18), we get
n
1
(n)
(n)
lim sup log P E3 \ E1
≤ lim sup
n
ER
dER
1,2 −d1
2
(n)
ER
log n + nΣ(µER
2 |µ1 ) − log L2
n
ER
dER
1,2 −d1
2
ER
− α2 ) log n + n(Σ(µER
2 |µ1 ) − R2 )
n
(n)
nα2 log n + nR2 − log L2
.
+ lim sup
n
≤ lim sup
n(
(20)
Note that the first term is strictly negative due to the assumption (14b), while the second term
(n)
(n)
(n)
is nonpositive due to our way of choosing L2 . This means that P(E3 \ E1 ) goes to zero as n
(n)
(n)
goes to infinity. Similarly, P(E4 \ E1 ) converges to zero. This means that there exists a sequence of
deterministic codebooks with vanishing probability of error, which completes the proof of achievability.
5.2
Proof of Achievability for the Configuration model
Our achievability proof for this case is very similar in nature to that for the Erdős–Rényi case, with
the modifications discussed below.
10
~ = ck (d~(n) )
Let D(n) be the set of degree sequences d~ with entries bounded by ∆ such that ck (d)
(n)
for all 0 ≤ k ≤ ∆. Moreover,
redefine M
to be the set of mark count vectors
m
~ such that
P
P
P
2/3
, where recall that mn = ( ni=1 d(n) (i))/2. We
x∈Ξ1,2 |m(x) − mn γx | ≤ n
x∈Ξ1,2 m(x) = mn and
(n)
use the same
as in the previous section, i.e. the set of vertex mark count vectors ~u
P definition for U
such that θ∈Θ1,2 |u(θ) − nqθ | ≤ n2/3 .
In what follows, let X be a random variable with law ~r, X1 and X2 defined as in (11) and Γ =
(Γ1 , Γ2 ) a random variable with law ~γ .
−
→
(n)
(n)
We define W (n) to be the set of graphs H1,2 ∈ G1,2 such that: (i) dgH (n) ∈ D(n) , (ii) m
~ H (n) ∈ M(n) ,
1,2
1,2
(iii) ~uH (n) ∈ U (n) , (iv) for all 0 ≤ l ≤ k ≤ ∆, recalling the notation in (2), we have
1,2
−
→
−
→
|ck,l (dgH (n) , dgH (n) ) − nP (X = k, X1 = l) | ≤ n2/3 ,
1,2
1
(21)
and (v), for all 0 ≤ l ≤ k ≤ ∆, we have
−
→
−
→
|ck,l (dgH (n) , dgH (n) ) − nP (X = k, X2 = l) | ≤ n2/3 .
1,2
2
(22)
We employ a similar random binning framework as in Section 5.1. For decoding, upon receiving
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
a pair (i, j), we form the set of graphs H1,2 ∈ W (n) such that f1 (H1 ) = i and f2 (H2 ) = j. If
this set has only one element, we output it as the source graph; otherwise, we output an indication of
(n)
error. In order to prove the achievability, we consider the four error events Ei , 1 ≤ i ≤ 4, exactly as
(n)
those in the previous section, with Gp~,~q being replaced with W (n) .
(n)
(n)
It can be shown that if G ∼ G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~q), the probability of G ∈ W (n) goes to one as n goes
1,2
1,2
(n)
to infinity (see Lemma 4 in Appendix A). Therefore, P(E1 ) goes to zero.
(n)
To show that P(E2 ) vanishes, similar to the analysis in Section 5.1, we find an asymptotic upper
bound for log |W (n) |. By only considering the conditions (i), (ii) and (iii) in the definition of W (n) ,
we have
n
(n)
log |W (n) | ≤ log
+ log |Gd~(n) |
{ck (d~(n) )}∆
k=0
mn
2/3 |Ξ1,2 |
+ log (2n )
max
(23)
(n)
{m(x)}x∈Ξ1,2
m∈M
~
n
.
+ log (2n2/3 )|Θ1,2 | max
(n)
{u(θ)}
u
~ ∈U
θ∈Θ1,2
By assumption, we have r0 < 1, hence dCM
1,2 > 0. The condition (8) together with Lemma 3 then
implies that
(n)
d
log |G ~(n) | − n
dCM
1,2
2
log n
= −s(dCM
1,2 ) − E [log X!] .
n
Using this together with Lemma 1 for the other terms in (23), we have
lim
n→∞
dCM
log |W (n) | − n 1,2
2 log n
≤ −s(dCM
lim sup
1,2 ) + H(X)
n
n→∞
dCM
1,2
+
H(Γ) + H(Q) − E [log X!] = Σ(µCM
1,2 ),
2
where Γ and Q are random variables with law ~γ and ~q, respectively.
11
(24)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
Now, in order to show that P(E3 \E1 ) vanishes, we prove a counterpart for (19). For H1 ∈ G1 ,
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
we define S2 (H1 ) to be the set of graphs H2 ∈ G2 such that H1 ⊕ H2 ∈ W (n) . Then, it can
be shown that (see Appendix C)
(n)
max
(n)
lim sup
H1,2 ∈W (n)
(n)
log |S2 (H1 )| − n
n
n→∞
(n)
Then, similar to (20), this shows that P(E3
This completes the proof of achievability.
5.3
CM
dCM
1,2 − d1
log n
2
(25)
CM
≤ Σ(µCM
2 |µ1 ).
(n)
(n)
\ E1 ) vanishes. The proof for P(E4
(n)
\ E1 ) is similar.
Proof of the Converse for the Erdős–Rényi case
In this section, we show that every rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) ∈ R for the Erdős–Rényi scenario must
satisfy the conditions (13a)–(13c). By definition, for a rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) ∈ R, there exist
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
sequences R1 and R2 such that for each m, (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) is achievable, and besides we have
(m)
(m)
(m)
(m)
R1 → R1 and R2 → R2 . If we show that (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) satisfies (13a)–(13c) for each m, it is
easy to see that (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) must also satisfy the same inequalities. Therefore, it suffices to show
that any achievable rate tuple satisfies (13a)–(13c).
For this, take an achievable rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) together with a corresponding sequence of
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
hn, L1 , L2 i codes (f1 , f2 , g (n) ). By definition, we have
(n)
lim sup
− (αi n log n + Ri n)
≤0
n
log Li
n→∞
i ∈ {1, 2},
(26)
(n)
(n)
and also the error probability Pe goes to zero as n goes to infinity. Now, we define the set A(n) ⊆ G1,2
as
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
A(n) := Gp~,~q ∩ {H1,2 ∈ G1,2 : g (n) (f1 (H1 ), f2 (H2 )) = H1,2 },
(27)
(n)
where Gp~,~q was defined in Section 5.1. In fact, A(n) is the set of “typical” graphs with respect to the
(n)
(n)
Erdős–Rényi model that are successfully decoded by the code (f1 , f2 , g (n) ). In the following, let
(n)
(n)
q ) be distributed according to the Erdős–Rényi model. Moreover, let PER be the law
G1,2 ∼ G (n) (n; p~, ~
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
of G1,2 , i.e. for H1,2 ∈ G1,2 , PER (H1,2 ) := P(G1,2 = H1,2 ). With this, we define a random variable
(n)
G̃1,2
(n)
whose distribution is the conditional distribution of G1,2 , conditioned on lying in A(n) , i.e.
(
(n)
(n)
(n)
PER (H1,2 )/πn H1,2 ∈ A(n)
(n)
(n)
(28)
P G̃1,2 = H1,2 =
0
o.t.w.
(n)
(n)
(n)
where πn := P G1,2 ∈ A(n) is the normalizing factor. Additionally, let P̃ER be the law of G̃1,2 . If,
(n)
for i ∈ {1, 2}, M̃i
(n)
(n)
denotes fi (G̃i ), we have
(n)
(n)
log L1 + log L2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
≥ H(M̃1 ) + H(M̃2 ) ≥ H(M̃1 , M̃2 )
(29)
(n)
= H(G̃1,2 ),
(n)
where the last equality follows from the fact that, by definition, G̃1,2 takes values among the graphs
(n)
that are successfully decoded, and hence is uniquely identified given M̃1
12
(n)
and M̃2 .
(n)
(n)
(n)
Now, we find a lower bound for H(G̃1,2 ). For doing so, note that for H1,2 ∈ G1,2 and n large
enough, we have
!
P
X
X
p
n
x∈Ξ1,2 px
x
(n)
(n)
− log PER (H1,2 ) = −
mH (n) (x) log
−
−
mH (n) (x) log 1 −
1,2
1,2
n
n
2
x∈Ξ1,2
x∈Ξ1,2
X
uH (n) (θ) log qθ .
−
θ∈Θ1,2
1,2
(n)
Gp~,~q ,
(n)
H1,2
(n)
Gp~,~q
On the other hand, due to the definition of
if
∈
then, for all x ∈ Ξ1,2
have
px
px
n − n2/3 ≤ mH (n) (x) ≤ n + n2/3 , and
1,2
2
2
nqθ − n2/3 ≤ uH (n) (θ) ≤ nqθ + n2/3 .
(30)
and θ ∈ Θ1,2 , we
1,2
Substituting these in (30) and using the inequality log(1 − x) ≤ −x which holds for x ∈ (0, 1), for n
large enough, we have
P
X px
X px
n
x∈Ξ1,2 px
(n)
(n)
n − n2/3 (log n − log px ) +
− log PER (H1,2 ) ≥
n + n2/3
−
2
2
n
2
x∈Ξ1,2
x∈Ξ1,2
X
(nqθ − n2/3 ) log qθ .
−
θ∈Θ1,2
Using
P
x∈Ξ1,2
px = dER
1,2 and simplifying the above, we realize that there exists a constant c > 0 that
(n)
(n)
does not depend on n or H1,2 , such that for all H1,2 ∈ A(n) , we have
(n)
(n)
− log PER (H1,2 ) ≥ n
X px
X px
X
dER
1,2
qθ log qθ − cn2/3 log n
log n − n
log px + n
−n
2
2
2
x∈Ξ1,2
x∈Ξ1,2
θ∈Θ1,2
dER
1,2
2/3
=n
log n + nΣ(µER
log n.
1,2 ) − cn
2
Now, if
(n)
G̃1,2
(31)
is the random variable defined in (28), we have
(n)
H(G̃1,2 ) = −
(n)
X
(n)
(n)
(n)
P̃ER (H1,2 ) log P̃ER (H1,2 )
(n)
H1,2 ∈A(n)
= log πn −
1
πn
(n)
X
(n)
(n)
(n)
PER (H1,2 ) log PER (H1,2 ).
(n)
H1,2 ∈A(n)
(n)
Note that since the probability of error of the above code vanishes, i.e. Pe
(n)
(n)
→ 0, and P G1,2 ∈ Gp~,~q →
(n)
(n)
1, we have πn → 1 as n → ∞. On the other hand, with probability one, we have G̃1,2 ∈ Gp~,~q . Also,
P
(n)
(n)
by the definition of πn , we have H (n) ∈A(n) PER (H1,2 ) = πn . Thereby, employing the bound (31), we
1,2
have
(n)
H(G̃1,2 ) − n
lim inf
n→∞
n
dER
1,2
2
13
log n
≥ Σ(µER
1,2 ).
(32)
Now, using the assumption (26) together with the bound (29), we have
(n)
0 ≥ lim sup
n→∞
(n)
≥ lim inf
(n)
log L1 + log L2 − (α1 + α2 )n log n − n(R1 + R2 )
n
H(G̃1,2 ) − n
n→∞
dER
1,2
2
log n − nΣ(µER
n
1,2 )
+ lim inf
n→∞
n
dER
1,2
2
log n + nΣ(µER
1,2 ) − (α1 + α2 )n log n − n(R1 + R2 )
.
n
(33)
The first term is nonnegative due to (32). Consequently,
ER
d
−
α
−
α
log n + n(Σ(µER
n 1,2
1
2
1,2 ) − R1 − R2 )
2
.
0 ≥ lim inf
n→∞
n
(34)
ER
Note that this is impossible unless α1 + α2 ≥ dER
1,2 /2. Furthermore, if α1 + α2 = d1,2 , it must be the
ER
ER
case that R1 + R2 ≥ Σ(µ1,2 ). But this is precisely (13c) for µ1,2 = µ1,2 .
Now, we turn to showing (13a). We have
(n)
log L1
(n)
(n)
(n)
≥ H(M̃1 ) ≥ H(M̃1 |M̃2 )
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
= H(G̃1 , M̃1 |M̃2 ) − H(G̃1 |M̃1 , M̃2 )
(a)
(n)
(n)
= H(G̃1 |M̃2 )
(b)
(n)
(35)
(n)
≥ H(G̃1 |G̃2 )
(n)
(n)
= H(G̃1,2 ) − H(G̃2 ).
(n)
(n)
where (a) uses the facts that M̃1
(n)
M̃2
we
Now, we
(n)
(n)
can unambiguously determine G̃1,2 and
(n)
find an upper bound for H(G̃2 ). Note
hence
(n)
and also, since G̃1,2 ∈ A(n) , given M̃1
is a function of G̃1
(n)
G̃1 .
Also, (b) uses data processing inequality.
(n)
that since G̃1,2 ∈ A(n) with probability one, we have
(n)
(n)
H(G̃2 ) ≤ log |A2 |,
where
(n)
A2
(n)
(n)
(n)
:= {H2
(n)
(n)
∈ G2
(n)
(n)
: H1
and
(n)
⊕ H2
(n)
(36)
(n)
∈ A(n) for some H1
(n)
∈ G1 }.
(n)
But for H1,2 := H1 ⊕ H2 ∈ A2 , since A2 ⊆ Gp~,~q , by definition we have that for all x ∈ Ξ1,2 and
all θ ∈ Θ1,2 ,
X
X
|uH (n) (θ) − nqθ | ≤ n2/3 .
|mH (n) (x) − npx /2| ≤ n2/3 and
x∈Ξ1,2
1,2
1,2
θ∈Θ1,2
P
Moreover, for x2 ∈ Ξ2 and θ2 ∈ Θ2 , we have mH (n) (x2 ) = x1 ∈Ξ1 ∪{◦1 } mH (n) ((x1 , x2 )) and uH (n) (θ2 ) =
1,2
2
2
P
θ1 ∈Θ1 mH (n) ((θ1 , θ2 )). Using this in the above and using triangle inequality, we realize that for
1,2
(n)
H2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
∈ A2 , we have m
~ H (n) ∈ M2 and ~uH (n) ∈ U2 , where M2 is the set of edge mark count
2
2
P
(n)
vectors m
~ such that x2 ∈Ξ2 |m(x2 ) − npx2 /2| ≤ n2/3 , and U2 is the set of vertex mark count vectors
P
~u such that θ2 ∈Θ2 |u(θ2 ) − nqθ2 | ≤ n2/3 . Consequently,
(n)
|A2 | ≤ (2n2/3 )(|Ξ2 |+|Θ2 |) max
(n)
m∈M
~
2
n
2
{m(x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
14
max
(n)
u
~ ∈U2
n
.
{u(θ2 )}θ2 ∈Θ2
(n)
Using Lemma 1 and the definition of M2
(n)
log |A2 | − n
lim sup
n
n→∞
dER
2
2
(n)
and U2
log n
above, with Q = (Q1 , Q2 ) ∼ ~q, we get
≤ H(Q2 ) +
X
s(px2 ) = Σ(µER
2 ).
x2 ∈Ξ2
Substituting into (36), we get
(n)
log H(G̃2 ) − n
lim sup
n
n→∞
dER
2
2
log n
≤ Σ(µER
2 ).
Using this together with (32) and substituting into (35) we get
(n)
lim inf
log L1 − n
ER
dER
1,2 −d2
2
n
n→∞
log n
ER
ER ER
≥ Σ(µER
1,2 ) − Σ(µ2 ) = Σ(µ1 |µ2 ).
Using a similar method as in (33) and (34), this implies (13a). The proof of (13b) is similar. This
completes the proof of the converse for the Erdős–Rényi case.
5.4
Proof of the Converse for the configuration model
The proof of the converse for the configuration model is similar to that for the Erdős–Rényi model
presented in the previous section. Take an achievable rate tuple (α1 , R1 , α2 , R2 ) together with a
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
sequence of hn, L1 , L2 i codes (f1 , f2 , g (n) ) achieving this rate tuple. Moreover, redefine the set
A(n) to be
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
A(n) := W (n) ∩ {H1,2 ∈ G1,2 : g (n) (f1 (H1 ), f2 (H2 )) = H1,2 },
(37)
(n)
where the set W (n) was defined in Section 5.2. Now, let G1,2 ∼ G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~q) be distributed according
(n)
to the configuration model ensemble, and let G̃1,2 ∈ A(n) have the distribution obtained from that of
(n)
G1,2
(n)
A
(n)
by conditioning on it lying in the set A(n) . Note that the normalizing constant πn := P(G1,2 ∈
(n)
(n)
) goes to 1 as n → ∞ since P(G1,2 ∈ W (n) ) → 1 and the error probability of the code, Pe ,
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
vanishes. Moreover, let PCM and P̃CM be the laws of G1,2 and G̃1,2 , respectively. In the following, we
show that
dCM
(n)
H(G̃1,2 ) − n 1,2
2 log n
≥ Σ(µCM
(38)
lim inf
1,2 ),
n→∞
n
and
(n)
dCM
H(G̃2 ) − n 22 log n
lim sup
≤ Σ(µCM
(39)
2 ).
n
n→∞
The rest of the proof is then identical to that of the previous section, so we only focus on proving the
above two statements.
−
→
(n)
(n)
For (38), note that for H1,2 ∈ G1,2 such that dgH (n) ∈ D(n) , where D(n) was defined in Section 5.2,
1,2
we have
(n)
(n)
− log PCM (H1,2 )
= log
n
{ck (d~(n) )}∆
k=0
(n)
d
+ log |G ~(n) | −
15
X
x∈Ξ1,2
mH (n) (x) log γx −
1,2
X
θ∈Θ1,2
uH (n) (θ) log qθ .
1,2
(n)
Now, if H1,2 ∈ W (n) , using the definition of W (n) we realize that there exists a constant c > 0 such
that
X
X
n
(n)
(n)
(n)
+log
|G
|−
− log PCM (H1,2 ) ≥ log
m
γ
log
γ
−
nqθ log qθ −cn2/3 =: Kn .
n
x
x
d~(n)
{ck (d~(n) )}∆
k=0
x∈Ξ1,2
θ∈Θ1,2
(n)
(n)
Note that the right hand side is a constant independent of H1,2 and is denoted by Kn . Since G̃1,2 falls in
(n)
W (n) with probability one, this means that H(G̃1,2 ) ≥ log πn + Kn . But πn → 1 as n → ∞. Therefore,
using the assumption (8) together with (24) from Section 5.2 and also the fact that mn /n → dCM
1,2 /2,
we realize that
(n)
H(G̃1,2 ) − n
lim inf
n→∞
n
dCM
1,2
2
log n
≥ H(X) − s(dCM
1,2 ) − E [log X!] +
dCM
1,2
H(Γ) + H(Q),
2
where X ∼ ~r, Γ ∼ ~γ and Q ∼ ~
q . Note that the right hand side is precisely Σ(µCM
1,2 ), hence we have
proved (38).
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
In order to show (39), note that H(G̃2 ) ≤ log |A2 | where A2 consists of graphs H2 ∈ G2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
such that for some H1 ∈ G1 , we have H1 ⊕ H2 ∈ A(n) . Since A(n) ⊆ W (n) , for all H2 ∈ A2
we have
X
X
|mH (n) (x2 ) − mn γx2 | ≤ n2/3 and
(40)
|uH (n) (θ2 ) − nqθ2 | ≤ n2/3 .
2
x2 ∈Ξ2
2
θ2 ∈Θ2
−
→
(n)
(n)
On the other hand, the condition (22) implies that dgH (n) ∈ D2 where D2 denotes the set of degree
2
sequences d~ of size n with elements bounded by ∆ such that
~ − nP (X2 = k) | ≤ (∆ + 1)n2/3
|ck (d)
∀0 ≤ k ≤ ∆,
where X2 is the random variable defined in (11). Consequently, we have
P
(n)
log |A2 |
≤
(n)
log |D2 |
+
(n)
max log |G ~ |
d
(n)
~
d∈D
+
2
max
(n)
H2
(n)
log
∈A2
x2 ∈Ξ2
(41)
mH (n) (x2 )
2
{mH (n) (x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
2
n
+ max log
.
(n)
(n)
{uH (n) (θ2 )}θ2 ∈Θ2
H2 ∈A2
(42)
2
(n)
Note that (41) implies that |D2 | ≤ (2(∆ + 1)n2/3 )∆+1 maxd∈D
(n)
~
2
implies
1
(n)
lim sup log |D2 | ≤ H(X2 ).
n
n→∞
n
.
~ ∆
{ck (d)}
k=0
Therefore, Lemma 1
(43)
> 0. Hence, using Lemma 3 in
On the other hand, the assumptions r0 < 1 and (7) imply that dCM
2
Appendix A we have
lim sup
(n)
d
maxd∈D
(n) log |G
~
~ |−n
2
(n)
log n
n
n→∞
Moreover, if H2
dCM
2
2
≤ −s(dCM
2 ) − E [log X2 !] .
(n)
is a sequence in A2 , from (40), for all x2 ∈ Ξ2 , we have
lim P
n→∞
mH (n) (x2 )
2
′
x′2 ∈Ξ2 mH2(n) (x2 )
=P
γx 2
x′2 ∈Ξ2
16
γx′2
= P (Γ2 = x2 |Γ2 6= ◦2 ) ,
(44)
where Γ = (Γ1 , Γ2 ) has law ~γ . Additionally, we have
1 X
dCM
mH (n) (x2 ) = 2 .
n→∞ n
2
2
lim
x2 ∈Ξ2
Thereby, from Lemma 1, we have
1
lim sup
max log
n→∞ n H2(n) ∈A2(n)
P
x2 ∈Ξ2
mH (n) (x2 )
2
{mH (n) (x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
2
≤
dCM
2
H(Γ2 |Γ2 6= ◦2 ).
2
(45)
Finally, as we have uH (n) (θ2 )/n → qθ2 for all θ2 ∈ Θ2 , another usage of Lemma 1 implies that
2
lim sup
n→∞
1
n
max log
≤ H(Q2 ),
n H2(n) ∈A2(n)
{uH (n) (θ2 )}θ2 ∈Θ2
(46)
2
where Q = (Q1 , Q2 ) has law ~
q . Now, combining (43), (44), (45) and (46) and substituting into (42),
(n)
(n)
and also using the bound H(G̃2 ) ≤ log |A2 |, we realize that
(n)
lim sup
n→∞
H(G̃2 ) − n
n
dCM
2
2
log n
≤ H(X2 ) − s(dCM
2 ) − E [log X2 !] +
dCM
2
H(Γ2 |Γ2 6= ◦2 ) + H(Q2 ).
2
But the right hand side is precisely Σ(µCM
2 ). This completes the proof of (39). As was mentioned
before, the rest of the proof is identical to that in the previous section.
6
Conclusion
We gave a counterpart of the Slepian–Wolf Theorem for graphical data, employing the framework of
local weak convergence. We derived the rate region for two graph ensembles, namely an Erdős–Rényi
model and a configuration model.
A
Asymptotic behavior of the entropy of the configuration
model
Here, we prove (12a)–(12c). Before this, we set some notation and state some general lemmas. In what
follows, we employ the definitions of the sets W (n) and D(n) from Section 5.2. Moreover, Γ = (Γ1 , Γ2 )
and Q = (Q1 , Q2 ) be random variables with laws ~γ and ~q, respectively. Let β1 := P(Γ1 6= ◦1 ) and Γ̃1
(n)
be a random variable on Ξ1 with the law of Γ1 conditioned on Γ1 6= ◦1 . Let F1,2 be a simple unmarked
(n)
(n)
graph chosen uniformly at random from the set ∪ ~ (n) G . By definition, G
∼ G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~q) is
d∈D
obtained from
(n)
F1,2
d~
1,2
by adding independent edge and vertex marks according to the laws of ~γ and ~q
(n)
(n)
respectively. Let F1 be obtained from F1,2 by independently removing each edge with probability
(n)
(n)
1 − β1 . Then, G1 can be thought of as obtained from F1 by adding independent vertex and edge
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
marks with the laws of Q1 and Γ̃1 , respectively. Hence, we may consider G1,2 , F1,2 , G1 and F1 on
a joint probability space.
It is straightforward to see the following.
17
Lemma 2. Assume X is an integer valued random variable taking value in {0, . . . , ∆} and 0 ≤ ǫ ≤ 1.
Let {Yi }i≥1 be a sequence of i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with P (Yi = 1) = ǫ. Define the random
PX
variable X1 to be i=1 Yi and X2 := X − X1 . Then, we have
X
H(X1 , X2 ) = H(X) + E [X] H(Y1 ) − E log
.
X1
The following lemma which is a direct consequence of Theorem 4.5 and Corollary 4.6 in [BC14], is
useful in the asymptotic analysis of the count of the graphs with a given degree sequence.
Lemma 3. Given an integer ∆, assume that Y is an integer random variable bounded by ∆ such that
(n)
d := E [Y ] > 0. Moreover, assume that for each n, ~a(n) =
(1), . . . , a(n) (n)) is a degree sequence
P(a
n
(n)
(i) is even and, for 0 ≤ k ≤ ∆,
of length n with entries bounded by ∆ such that bn :=
i=1 a
(n)
ck (~a )/n → P(Y = k). Then, we have
(n)
log |G~a(n) | −
n→∞
n
lim
where s(d) :=
d
2
−
d
2
bn
2
log n
= −s(d) − E [log Y !] ,
log d.
(n)
(n)
/ W (n) ) ≤ κn−1/3 for some constant κ > 0.
q ), we have P(G1,2 ∈
Lemma 4. If G1,2 ∼ G(n; d~(n) , ~γ , ~
Proof. For this, we note the following. Condition (i) in the definition of W (n) always holds for a
(n)
realization G1,2 . Chebyshev’s inequality implies that conditions (ii) and (iii) hold with probability at
least 1 − κ1 n−1/3 , for some κ1 > 0. To show (iv), fix k and l and for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, let Yi be the indicator
Pn
−
→
−
→
of dgG(n) (i) = k and dgG(n) (i) = l. With Y := i=1 Yi , we have ck,l (dgG(n) , dgG(n) ) = Y . Note that
1,2
1
(n)
1,2
1
(n)
an edge of G1,2 exists in G1 if its mark is not of the form (◦1 , x2 ), which happens with probability
β1 . Therefore,
i
h
h
i dg (n) (i)
(n)
F1,2
E Yi |F1,2 = 1 dgF (n) (i) = k
β1l (1 − β1 )k−l .
1,2
l
Consequently,
i
h
k l
(n)
(n)
~
β (1 − β1 )k−l .
E Y |F1,2 = ck (d )
l 1
Since this is a constant, it is also equal to E [Y ]. Now, if sk,l := P (X = k, X1 = l), we have sk,l =
rk kl β1l (1 − β1 )k−l . Hence, the assumption (8) implies that
k l
β (1 − β1 )k−l .
(47)
|E [Y ] − nsk,l | ≤ n1/2
l 1
(n)
Furthermore, since edge marks are chosen independently, conditioned on F1,2 , if i and j are nonadjacent
(n)
(n)
vertices in F1,2 , then Yi are Yj are independent, conditioned on F1,2 . As a result, if I denotes the set
18
(n)
of (i, j) with 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n such that i and j are not adjacent in F1,2 , we have
n
i
h
i X
h
(n)
(n)
E Yi2 |F1,2 +
E Y 2 |F1,2 =
i=1
≤n+
X
(i,j)∈I
/
X
1≤i6=j≤n
i
h
(n)
E Yi Yj |F1,2
i
h
i
h
X
(n)
(n)
E Yi Yj |F1,2
E Yi Yj |F1,2 +
(i,j)∈I
≤ n + 2mn +
X
i
h
(n)
E Yi Yj |F1,2
X
i
i h
h
(n)
(n)
E Yi |F1,2 E Yj |F1,2
(i,j)∈I
(a)
= n + 2mn +
(i,j)∈I
X
≤ n + 2mn +
1≤i6=j≤n
i
i h
h
(n)
(n)
E Yi |F1,2 E Yj |F1,2
i2
h
(n)
= n + 2mn + E Y |F1,2 ,
(n)
where (a) uses the fact that conditioned on F1,2 , the random variables Yi and Yj are independent for
1/2
(i, j) ∈ I.h From (8),
and κ2 := ∆(∆ + 1)/4 is a constant. As we saw
i we have |mn − nd1,2 /2| ≤ κ2 n
(n)
above, E Y |F1,2
= E [Y ]. Therefore, we have Var Y ≤ κ3 n for some κ3 > 0. This together with (47)
and Chebyshev’s inequality implies that the condition (iv) holds with probability at least 1 − κ4 n−1/3 ,
for some κ4 > 0. Similarly, the same statement holds for the condition (v).
Now we show (12a)–(12c). In the following, with X ∼ ~r and X1 and X2 defined as in (11), let
(n)
B1,2 be the set of pairs of degree sequences d~ and ~δ with n elements bounded by ∆ such that for all
~ ~δ) − nP(X1 = k, X ′ = l)| ≤ n2/3 , where X ′ := X − X1 . Moreover, let B (n) be
0 ≤ k, l ≤ ∆, |ck,l (d,
1
1
1
~ be the set of degree
~ ~δ) ∈ B (n) . For d~ ∈ B (n) , let B (n) (d)
the set of d~ such that for some ~δ, we have (d,
1
1,2
2|1
~ ~δ) ∈ B (n) .
sequences ~δ such that (d,
1,2
(n)
(n)
Now, we show (12a). Since G1,2 is formed by adding independent vertex and edge marks to F1,2 ,
we have
(n)
(n)
H(G1,2 ) = log |D(n) | + log |Gd~(n) | + mn H(Γ) + nH(Q).
∆K 1/2
From (8), we have |mn − ndCM
. Moreover, we have E [X] > 0. Consequently, using
1,2 /2| ≤ 2 n
1
(n)
Lemma 3 and the fact that n log |D | → H(X), we get (12a).
(n)
We now turn to showing (12b). Since the expected number of the edges in F1 is ndCM
1 /2, we
have
dCM
(n)
(n)
H(G1 ) = H(F1 ) + n 1 H(Γ1 |Γ1 6= ◦1 ) + nH(Q1 ).
(48)
2
(n)
(n)
With this, we focus on H(F1 ). With En being the indicator of G1,2 ∈
/ W (n) , we have
(n)
(n)
H(F1 ) = H(F1 |En = 0)P(En = 0)
(n)
+H(F1 |En = 1)P(En = 1).
From Lemma 4, we have
(n)
(n)
H(F1 |En = 1)P(En = 1) ≤ (H(F1,2 ) + mn H(β1 ))κn−1/3 ,
19
(49)
(n)
where H(β1 ) denotes the binary entropy of β1 . Note that as we discussed above, H(F1 ) = O(n log n).
Thereby, the RHS of the above is o(n). On the other hand, by the definition of W (n) , if E = 0,
−
→
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
dgF (n) ∈ B1 . Therefore, H(F1 |E = 0) ≤ log B1 + maxd∈B
|. The assumption r0 < 0
(n) log |G
~
d~
1
1
together with (7) imply that dCM
> 0. Hence, using Lemma 3 together with (49),
1
(n)
H(F1 ) − n
lim sup
n
(n)
Now, let F̃1
note that
dCM
1
2
log n
≤ −s(dCM
1 ) + H(X1 ) − E [log X1 !] .
(50)
(n)
(n)
be the unmarked graph consisting of the edges removed from F1,2 to obtain F1
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
and
(n)
H(F1 ) = H(F1 , F̃1 ) − H(F̃1 |F2 )
(51)
(n)
(n)
(n)
= H(F1,2 ) + mn H(β1 ) − H(F̃1 |F1 )
−
→
→
(n) −
Note that, conditioned on E = 0, we have dgF̃ (n) ∈ B2|1 (dgF (n) ). Moreover, the assumption (7)
1
1
CM
together with r0 < 0 imply that dCM
> 0. Hence, using a similar method in proving (50), we
1,2 − d1
have
(n)
(n)
H(F̃1 |F1 ) − n
lim sup
n
CM
dCM
1,2 −d1
2
log n
CM
≤ −s(dCM
1,2 − d1 )
+H(X1′ |X1 ) − E [log X1′ !] .
(n)
Using this together with the asymptotic of H(F1,2 ) which was derived above in showing (12a) and
substituting into (51), followed by a simplification using Lemma 2, we get
(n)
H(F1 ) − n
lim inf
n
dCM
1
2
log n
(52)
≥ −s(dCM
1 ) + H(X1 ) − E [log X1 !] .
This together with (50) and (48) completes the proof of (12b). The proof of (12c) is similar.
(n)
(n)
Bounding |S2 (H1 )| for the Erdős–Rényi case
B
(n)
(n)
(n)
Note that for G1,2 ∈ G1,2 and H2
(n)
(n)
∈ G2 , if G1
(n)
⊕ H2
(n)
∈ Gp~,~q , we have m
~ G(n) ⊕H (n) ∈ M(n) and
1
2
~uG(n) ⊕H (n) ∈ U (n) . On the other hand, for fixed m
~ ∈ M(n) and ~u ∈ U (n) , if for all x1 ∈ Ξ1 we have
1
2
(n)
m(x1 ) = mG(n) (x1 ) and for all θ1 ∈ Θ1 we have u(θ1 ) = uG(n) (θ1 ), then the number of H2
1
1
m
~ G(n) ⊕H (n) = m
~ and ~uG(n) ⊕H (n) = ~u is at most
1
2
A2 (m,
~ ~u) :=
1
Y
x1 ∈Ξ1
such that
2
m(x1 )
{m(x1 , x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2 ∪{◦2 }
!!
×
!
P
Y
− x1 ∈Ξ1 m(x1 )
×
{m(◦1 , x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
θ ∈Θ
n
2
1
1
!
u(θ1 )
,
{u(θ1 , θ2 )}θ2 ∈Θ2
where we have used the notational conventions in (3) and (4). Consequently, we have
max
(n)
(n)
G1,2 ∈Gp
~,~
q
(n)
(n)
|S2 (G1 )| ≤ |M(n) ||U (n) | max A2 (m,
~ ~u)
(n)
m∈M
~
u
~ ∈U (n)
≤ (2n2/3 )(|Ξ1,2 |+|Θ1,2 |) max A2 (m,
~ ~u).
(n)
m∈M
~
u
~ ∈U (n)
20
(53)
Now, if m
~ (n) and ~u(n) are sequences in M(n) and U (n) , respectively, for all x ∈ Ξ1,2 we have
(n)
m (x)/n → px /2. Furthermore, for all x1 ∈ Ξ1 and θ1 ∈ Θ1 , we have m(n) (x1 )/n → px1 /2 and
~ (n) and ~u(n) , with Q = (Q1 , Q2 )
u(n) (θ1 )/n → qθ1 . As a result, using Lemma 1, for any such sequences m
having law ~
q we have
P
log A2 (m
~ (n) , ~u(n) ) − ( x2 ∈Ξ2 m(n) (◦1 , x2 )) log n
lim
n→∞
n
!
X
X px
p(x1 ,x2 )
1
=
s(p◦1 ,x2 ) +
H
2
px 1
x2 ∈Ξ2 ∪{◦2 }
x2 ∈Ξ2
x1 ∈Ξ1
!
X
qθ1 ,θ2
qθ1 H
+
qθ1 θ2 ∈Θ2
θ1 ∈Θ1
X
X
= H(Q2 |Q1 ) +
s(px ) −
s(px1 )
x∈Ξ1,2
=
x1 ∈Ξ1
ER
Σ(µER
2 |µ1 ),
where the second inequality follows by rearranging the terms and using the definition of s(.). Using
the fact that |m(n) (◦1 , x2 ) − np◦1 ,x2 /2| ≤ n2/3 ,
log An (m
~ (n) , ~u(n) ) − n
lim
n→∞
n
ER
dER
1,2 −d1
2
log n
ER
= Σ(µER
2 |µ1 ).
This together with (53) implies (19).
C
(n)
(n)
Bounding |S2 (H1 )| for the configuration model
(n)
(n)
(n)
Here, we find an upper bound for maxH (n) |S2 (H1 )| and use it to show (25). Fix G1,2 ∈ W (n) and
1,2
(n)
assume H2
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
(n)
∈ S2 (G1 ). With H1,2 := G1 ⊕ H2 , let H̃2
(n)
be the subgraph of H1,2 consisting of
(n)
edges not present in G1 . Employing the notation of Appendix A, by the definition of the set W (n) ,
−
→
→
(n)
(n) −
(n)
we have dgH̃ (n) ∈ B2|1 (dgG(n) ). Therefore, we can think of H1,2 as constructed from G1 by adding a
2
1
−
→
(n)
graph to G1 with degree sequence dgH̃ (n) , markings its edges, adding second domain marks to edges
2
(n)
in G1 , and also adding second domain marks to vertices. Consequently,
max
(n)
H1,2 ∈W (n)
(n)
(n)
log |S2 (H1 )| ≤
+ max log
(n)
m∈M
~
+ max log
u∈U (n)
~
max
(n)
G1,2 ∈W (n)
→
(n) −
log |B2|1 (dgG(n) )| +
1
mn − x1 ∈Ξ1 m(x1 )
{m(◦1 , x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
u(θ1 )
{u(θ1 , θ2 )}θ2 ∈Θ2
!
Y
θ1 ∈Θ1
log |G~δ |
G
1
!
P
(n)
max
→
(n)
(n) −
G1,2 ∈W (n) ,~
δ∈B2|1 (dg (n) )
Y
x1 ∈Ξ1
m(x1 )
{m(x1 , x2 )}x2 ∈Ξ2
!
(n)
The definition of B2|1 implies that
→
1
(n) −
max log |B2|1 (dgH (n) )| = H(X − X1 |X1 ).
(n)
n→∞ n H
1
(n)
1,2 ∈W
lim
21
(54)
CM
Note that the assumption (7) together with r0 < 1 implies that dCM
> 0. Therefore, Lemma 3
1,2 − d1
in Appendix A implies that
lim sup
max
n→∞
(n)
G1,2 ∈W (n)
(n)
δ
log |G~ | − n
CM
dCM
1,2 −d1
2
log n
n
CM
≤ −s(dCM
1,2 − d1 ) − E [log(X − X1 )!] .
−
→
~
δ∈B(dg
(n) )
G
1
Furthermore, a usage of Lemma 1 implies that the third and the fourth terms in (54) divided by n
dCM
converge to 1,2
γ and Q has law ~q.
2 H(Γ2 |Γ1 ) and H(Q), respectively, where Γ = (Γ1 , Γ2 ) has law ~
Putting these together, we have
(n)
(n)
lim
maxG(n) ∈W (n) log |S2 (G1 )| − n
1,2
n→∞
CM
dCM
1,2 −d1
2
n
log n
CM
= −s(dCM
1,2 − d1 ) + H(X − X1 |X1 )
−E [log(X − X1 )!] +
dCM
1,2
H(Γ2 |Γ1 ) + H(Q2 |Q1 ).
2
CM
Using Lemma 2 and rearranging, this is precisely equal to Σ(µCM
2 |µ1 ), which completes the proof of
(25).
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge support from the NSF grants ECCS-1343398, CNS- 1527846, CCF-1618145,
the NSF Science & Technology Center grant CCF- 0939370 (Science of Information), and the William
and Flora Hewlett Foundation supported Center for Long Term Cybersecurity at Berkeley.
References
[Abb16] Emmanuel Abbe. Graph compression: The effect of clusters. In Communication, Control,
and Computing (Allerton), 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on, pages 1–8. IEEE, 2016.
[AL07] David Aldous and Russell Lyons. Processes on unimodular random networks. Electron. J.
Probab, 12(54):1454–1508, 2007.
[AS04]
David Aldous and J Michael Steele. The objective method: probabilistic combinatorial optimization and local weak convergence. In Probability on discrete structures, pages 1–72.
Springer, 2004.
[BC14] Charles Bordenave and Pietro Caputo. Large deviations of empirical neighborhood distribution in sparse random graphs. Probability Theory and Related Fields, pages 1–73, 2014.
[Bil13]
Patrick Billingsley. Convergence of probability measures. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[BS01]
Itai Benjamini and Oded Schramm. Recurrence of distributional limits of finite planar graphs.
Electron. J. Probab., 6:no. 23, 13 pp. (electronic), 2001.
[CS12]
Yongwook Choi and Wojciech Szpankowski. Compression of graphical structures: Fundamental limits, algorithms, and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
58(2):620–638, 2012.
22
[CT12] Thomas M Cover and Joy A Thomas. Elements of information theory. John Wiley & Sons,
2012.
[DA17] Payam Delgosha and Venkat Anantharam. Universal lossless compression of graphical data.
In Information Theory (ISIT), 2017 IEEE International Symposium on, pages 1578–1582.
IEEE, 2017.
23
| 7cs.IT
|
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE
INTERSECTIONS
arXiv:1308.5285v1 [math.AC] 24 Aug 2013
KUEI-NUAN LIN AND CLAUDIA POLINI
A BSTRACT. In this paper we describe the defining equations of the Rees algebra and the special
fiber ring of a truncation I of a complete intersection ideal in a polynomial ring over a field with
homogeneous maximal ideal m. To describe explicitly the Rees algebra R(I) in terms of generators
and relations we map another Rees ring R(M ) onto it, where M is the direct sum of powers of m.
We compute a Gröbner basis of the ideal defining R(M ). It turns out that the normal domain R(M )
is a Koszul algebra and from this we deduce that in many instances R(I) is a Koszul algebra as well.
1. I NTRODUCTION
In this paper we investigate the Rees algebra R(I) = R[It] as well as the special fiber ring
F(I) = R(I) ⊗ k of an ideal I in a standard graded algebra R over a field k. These objects
are important to commutative algebraists because they encode the asymptotic behavior of the ideal
I and to algebraic geometers because their projective schemes define the blowup and the special
fiber of the blowup of the scheme Spec(R) along V (I). One of the central problems in the theory
of Rees rings is to describe R(I) and F(I) in terms of generators and relations (see for instance
[24, 29, 10, 28, 26, 17, 18, 15, 11, 6, 13, 14]). This is a challenging quest which is open for
most classes of ideals, even three generated ideals in a polynomial ring in two variables (see for
instance [2, 1, 22]). The goal is to find an ideal A in a polynomial ring S = R[T1 , . . . , Ts ] so that
R(I) = S/A.
If the ideal I is generated by forms of the same degree, then these forms define rational maps
between projective spaces and the special fiber ring and the Rees ring describe the image and the
graph of such rational maps, respectively. By computing the defining equations of these algebras,
one is able to exhibit the implicit equations of the graph and of the variety parametrized by the
map. This classical and difficult problem in elimination theory has also been studied in applied
mathematics, most notably in modeling theory, where it is known as the implicitization problem
(see for instance [3, 4, 5, 9]).
If the ideal I is not generated by forms of the same degree, one can consider the truncation
of I past its generator degree. In this paper we treat truncations of complete intersection ideals
in a polynomial ring. More precisely, let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] be a polynomial ring over a field
k with homogeneous maximal ideal m, let f1 , . . . , fr be a homogeneous regular sequence in R
AMS 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 13A30; Secondary 13H15, 13B22, 13C14, 13C15, 13C40.
The first author was partially supported by an AWM-NSF mentor travel grant.
The second author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1202685 and NSA grant H98230-12-1-0242.
Keywords: Elimination theory, Gröbner basis, Koszul algebras, Rees algebra, Special fiber ring.
1
2
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
of degrees d1 ≥ . . . ≥ dr , let d ≥ d1 be an integer, and write ai = d − di . The truncation
I = (f1 , . . . , fr )≥d of the complete intersection (f1 , . . . , fr ) in degree d is the R-ideal generated by
P
the forms in (f1 , . . . , fr ) of degree at least d. In other words, I = (f1 , . . . , fr ) ∩ md = ri=1 mai fi .
The Cohen-Macaulayness of the Rees algebra of such ideals was previously studied in [12], where
the authors show that R(I) is Cohen-Macaulay for all d > D and they give a sharp estimate for D.
However, the defining equations of R(I) were unknown. In this paper we describe them explicitly
for all d when r = 2 and for d ≥ d1 + d2 when r ≥ 3. Furthermore we prove that the Rees ring and
the special fiber ring are Koszul algebras for d ≥ d1 + d2 and for d ≥ d1 + d2 − 1 if r = 2.
To determine the defining equations of R(I) we map another Rees ring R(M ) onto R(I), where
M is the module ma1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ mar . Our aim then becomes to find the defining ideal of R(M ) and
the kernel Q,
0 → Q −→ R(M ) −→ R(I) → 0 .
The problem of computing the implicit equation of R(M ) is interesting in its own right and it
was previously addressed in [23], where the relation type of R(M ) was computed. We solve it in
Section 2. It turns out that R(M ) and F(M ) are normal domains whose defining ideals have a
Gröbner basis of quadrics; hence, they are Koszul algebras. For r = 2, the kernel Q is a height
one prime ideal of the normal domain R(M ); therefore it is a divisorial ideal of R(M ). Our goal
is then reduced to explicitly describing ideals that represent the elements in the divisor class group
of R(M ). The approach is very much inspired by [21] and [20]. For r = 2 and d ≥ d1 + d2 − 1
or r ≥ 3 and d ≥ d1 + d2 , the ideal I has a linear presentation and Q turns out to be a linear ideal
in the T ′ s. Using this we prove that the defining ideal of R(I) has a quadratic Gröbner basis and
hence R(I) is a Koszul algebra as well.
2. T HE B LOWUP
ALGEBRAS OF DIRECT SUMS OF POWERS OF THE MAXIMAL IDEAL
Let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] be a polynomial ring over a field k with homogeneous maximal ideal
m. Let 0 ≤ a1 ≤ . . . ≤ ar be integers. Write a = a1 , . . . , ar . In this section, we will describe
explicitly the Rees algebra and the special fiber ring of the module M = Ma = ma1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ mar in
terms of generators and relations and we will prove that they are Koszul normal domains. We will
end the section with a study of the divisor class group of the blowup algebras of M .
Definition 2.1. Let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] be a polynomial ring over a field k. Let a be a positive
integer, write Ja and Ja′ for the two sets of multi-indices in (N ∪ {0})n−1 and Nn−1 , respectively,
that are defined as follows
Ja = {j = (jn−1 , . . . , j1 ) | 0 ≤ j1 ≤ . . . ≤ jn−1 ≤ a} ,
Ja′ = {j = (jn−1 , . . . , j1 ) | 1 ≤ j1 ≤ . . . ≤ jn−1 ≤ a} .
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
3
Write xa,j and xa,j,s for the monomials
x
a,j
=
n
Y
j −ji−1
xi i
i=1
with j ∈ Ja , j0 = 0, jn = a and
xa,j,s =
xs a,j
x
x1
with j ∈ Ja′ , 1 ≤ s ≤ n .
The Rees algebra R(M ) of M is the subalgebra
R(M ) = R[{xal ,j tl | 1 ≤ l ≤ r, j ∈ Jal }] ⊂ R[t1 , . . . , tr ]
of the polynomial ring R[t1 , . . . , tr ], while the special fiber ring F(M ) is the subalgebra of R(M )
F(M ) = k[{xal ,j tl | 1 ≤ l ≤ r, j ∈ Jal ] ⊂ R(M ) .
To find a presentation of these algebras we consider the polynomial rings
T = Ta = k[{Tl,j | 1 ≤ l ≤ r, j ∈ Jal }]
S = Sa = R ⊗k Ta = Ta [x1 , . . . , xn ]
in the new variables Tl,j and the epimorphisms of algebras
(1)
φ : S → R(M )
ψ : T → F(M )
defined by
φ(Tl,j ) = ψ(Tl,j ) = xal ,j tl .
Notice that ψ is the restriction of φ to T .
We can assume that the ai ’s are all positive because if ai = 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ s with s ≤ r then the
Rees algebra R(M ) is isomorphic to a polynomial ring over the Rees algebra of mas+1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ mar
R(⊕rl=1 mal ) ∼
= R(⊕rl=s+1 mal )[t1 , · · · , ts ] ,
and likewise for the special fiber ring. Furthermore, we can treat simultaneously the special fiber
ring and the Rees algebra since
R(⊕rl=1 mal ) ∼
= F(m ⊕ (⊕rl=1 mal ))
and
F(M ) = R(M )/mR(M ) .
Definition 2.2. Let τ be the lexicographic order on a set of multi-indices in (N ∪ {0})n , i.e. p > q if
the first nonzero entry of p− q is positive. Let 1 ≤ a1 ≤ . . . ≤ ar be integers. Write a = a1 , . . . , ar .
Order the set of multi-indices {(l, j) | 1 ≤ l ≤ r, j ∈ Ja′l } by τ . Write Tl,j,s for the variable
Tl,jn−1 ,...,js ,js−1 −1,...,j1 −1 .
P
+n−2
(1) Let Ba be the n × ( rl=1 aln−1
) matrix whose entry in the s-row and the (l, j)-column
is the variable Tl,j,s with 1 ≤ s ≤ n, 1 ≤ l ≤ r, and j ∈ Ja′l .
4
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
(2) Let Ca be the n × (1 +
Pr
l=1
al +n−2
)
n−1
matrix
x1
..
Ca = .
xn
Ba .
Example 2.3. For instance if n = 3, r = 2 and a = 1, 2 then Ba is the 3 × 4 matrix
T1,1,1 T2,1,1 T2,2,1 T2,2,2
Ba = T1,1,0 T2,1,0 T2,2,0 T2,2,1 .
T1,0,0 T2,0,0 T2,1,0 T2,1,1
Write L for the kernel of the epimorphism φ defined in (1). Notice that φ(Tl,j,s ) = xa,j,s tl =
xs a,j
x1 x tl hence one can easily deduce the inclusion
I2 (Ca ) ⊂ L .
Our goal is to show that the above inclusion is an equality. In order to establish this claim it suffices
to show that I2 (Ca ) is a prime ideal of dimension at most n + r = dim R(M ) (see for instance [27,
2.2]).
Theorem 2.4. Let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] be a polynomial ring over a field k with homogeneous maximal ideal m. Let 1 ≤ a1 ≤ . . . ≤ ar be integers and let M = ma1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ mar . The Rees algebra
and the special fiber ring of M are Koszul normal domains. Furthermore,
R(M ) = S/I2 (Ca )
F(M ) = T /I2 (Ba ) ,
where a, Ca , and Ba are as in Definition 2.2.
An important step in the proof of Theorem 2.4 is to show that the set of 2 by 2 minors of Ca
forms a Gröbner basis for I2 (Ca ). In the next lemma we will show much more. Indeed, the set of
2×2 minors of any submatrix Da of Ca forms a Gröbner basis for I2 (Da ). Notice that τ induces an
ordering of the variables of T . With respect to this ordering we consider the reverse lexicographic
order on the monomials in the ring T , which we also call τ .
Remark 2.5. Let a′ = 1, a1 , . . . , ar and denote with Ta′ the polynomial ring associated with the
sequence a′ . Notice that Ta′ /I2 (Ba′ ) ∼
= Sa /I2 (Ca ) and the matrix Ca is equal (after changing the
name of the variables) to the matrix Ba′ .
Lemma 2.6. Adopt assumption 2.2 and let Da be any submatrix of Ca with the same number of
rows. The set of 2 × 2 minors of Da forms a Gröbner basis for I2 (Da ) with respect to τ .
We use a general strategy to compute the Gröbner bases that we outline below.
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
5
Strategy 2.7. Let R be a polynomial ring over a field with a fixed monomial order ” > ”. Let D
be a collection of 2 × 2 minors of a matrix with entries in R. The Buchberger criterion (see for
instance [8, 15.8]) states that a generating set D of an ideal is a Gröbner basis for the ideal if the
S-polynomials (or S-pairs) of any two elements of D reduces to zero module D. The following
strategy will be used to show that the remainders of the S-pairs of the elements of D reduces to
zero modulo D (see for instance [7, Section 2.9, Definition 1 and Theorem 3]). Let ad − bc and
hg − ef be two elements of D. To compute the S-polynomial S(ad − bc, hg − ef ) we can assume,
for instance, that h = a and ad > bc and ag > ef because otherwise the leading terms of the two
polynomials are relatively prime and therefore S(ad − bc, ag − ef ) reduces to zero modulo D (see
for instance [7, Section 2.9, Proposition 4]). We consider the matrix
d b 0
M = c a f .
G e g
We obtain the following equality by computing the determinant of M in two ways
d
(2)
a f
e g
−g
d b
c a
=b
c f
G g
−f
d b
.
G e
Notice that the left hand side of equation (2) is our S-polynomial S(ag − ef, ad − bc). If by a
suitable choice of G ∈ R, the polynomials cg − f G and de − bG are in D and each term on the right
hand side has order strictly less than adg, then the S-pair S(ag − ef, ad − bc) has remainder zero
modulo D and in particular it reduces to zero modulo D (see for instance [7, Section 2.9, Lemma
2]). The choice of the polynomial G and the matrix M depends on the polynomials we start with as
we will explain later.
Proof of Lemma 2.6 Because of Remark 2.5 it is enough to prove the statement for Da any submatrix of Ba′ with the same number of rows. Let D denote the set of 2 × 2 minors of Da . We use the
strategy described above to show that the S-polynomials of any two elements of D reduces to zero
module D. To simplify notation, we will use (l, j, s) to represent the entry Tl,j,s in the matrix Da .
The leading terms of two elements of D
h1 =
(l1 , i, s) (l2 , j, s)
(l1 , i, t) (l2 , j, t)
and
h2 =
(l3 , p, u) (l4 , q, u)
,
(l3 , p, v) (l4 , q, v)
where 1 ≤ s < t ≤ n, (l2 , j, s) > (l1 , i, s), 1 ≤ u < v ≤ n, and (l4 , q, u) > (l3 , p, u) are
(l1 , i, s)(l2 , j, t) and (l3 , p, u)(l4 , q, v). Notice that Tl,j,s > Tl,j,t if s < t. These will be relatively
prime unless (l1 , i, s) = (l3 , p, u), or (l1 , i, s) = (l4 , q, v), or (l2 , j, t) = (l3 , p, u), or (l2 , j, t) =
(l4 , q, v). Since (l1 , i, s) = (l4 , q, v) and (l2 , j, t) = (l3 , p, u) are symmetric, it suffices to consider
three cases.
Case 1: Set
(l1 , i, s) = a (l2 , j, s) = f
(l1 , i, s) = a (l3 , p, s) = c
h1 =
and
h2 =
,
(l1 , i, t) = e (l2 , j, t) = g
(l1 , i, u) = b (l3 , p, u) = d
6
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
where we can assume s < u ≤ t and l1 ≤ l2 ≤ l3 . We use equation (2) and the matrix M of
Strategy 2.7 with G = (l3 , p, t). The S-polynomial S(h1 , h2 ) reduces to zero modulo D because b
and e are smaller than any other entries of the two matrices defining h1 and h2 .
Case 2: Set
h1 =
(l1 , i, s) = a (l2 , j, s) = e
(l1 , i, t) = f (l2 , j, t) = g
and
h2 =
(l3 , p, u) = d (l1 , i, u) = c
(l3 , p, s) = b (l1 , i, s) = a
,
where u < s < t and l3 ≤ l1 ≤ l2 . We use equation (2) and the matrix M of Strategy 2.7 with
G = (l2 , j, u). The S-polynomial S(h1 , h2 ) reduces to zero modulo D because b and f are smaller
than any other entries of the two matrices defining h1 and h2 .
Case 3: Set
h1 =
(l1 , i, s) = d (l2 , j, s) = b
(l1 , i, t) = c (l2 , j, t) = a
and
h2 =
(l3 , p, u) = g (l2 , j, u) = e
(l3 , p, t) = f (l2 , j, t) = a
,
where we can assume u ≤ s < t and l1 ≤ l3 ≤ l2 . We use equation (2) and the matrix M of
Strategy 2.7 with G = (l1 , i, u). The S-polynomial S(h1 , h2 ) reduces to zero modulo D because c
and f are smaller than any other entries of the two matrices defining h1 and h2 .
Corollary 2.8. Adopt assumptions 2.2 and let Da be any submatrix of Ca with the same number of
rows. The ideal I2 (Da ) is prime in Sa .
Proof. Write S = Sa . Notice that by Lemma 2.6 the variable u ∈ S appearing in the first column
and the last row of the matrix Da does not divide any element in the generating set of inτ I2 (Da ).
Hence u is regular on S/I2 (Da ). After localizing at u the ideal I2 (Da )u is isomorphic to an ideal
generated by variables, which is a prime ideal in the ring Su . Thus I2 (Da ) is a prime ideal in the
ring S.
Corollary 2.9. Adopt assumptions 2.2. The initial ideal inτ (I2 (Ba ) is generated by the monomials
Tl1 ,i,s Tl2 ,j,t with (l1 , i) <τ (l2 , j) and s < t.
Proof. The assertion follows from Lemma 2.6.
Proof of Theorem 2.4 We first show that for any sequence of r positive integers a = a1 , . . . , ar ,
the Rees algebra of M is defined by the ideal of minors I2 (Ca ),
R(M ) = S/I2 (Ca ).
Let L be the kernel of the epimorphism φ defined in (1). Recall that I2 (Ca ) ⊂ L, where the first
ideal is prime, according to Corollary 2.8, and the second ideal has dimension n + r, according to
[27, 2.2]. Hence to show that equality holds it will be enough to prove that the dimension of I2 (Ca )
is at most n + r. By Remark 2.5, Ta′ /I2 (Ba′ ) ∼
= Sa /I2 (Ca ). Hence it will be enough to prove that
the dimension of I2 (Ba′ ) is at most n + r which is equivalent to show that the dimension of I2 (Ba )
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
7
is at most n + r − 1. As ht I2 (Ba ) = ht inτ (I2 (Ba )), we can compute the dimension of inτ (I2 (Ba ).
Let U be the set of r + n − 1 variables
U = {{Tl,0,··· ,0 }1≤l≤r , Tr,ar ,··· ,ar , Tr,ar ,...,ar ,0, . . . , Tr,ar ,0,··· ,0 } .
Consider the prime p ∈ Spec(T ) generated by all the variables of T that are not in U . We claim that
p is a minimal prime over inτ (I2 (Ba ). It is clear that the image of inτ (I2 (Ba )) in the quotient ring
T /p is zero. To show the claim, consider the prime ideal p′ ⊂ p obtained by deleting one variable
Tl,j , with j ∈ Jal , from the generating set of p. If l < r, then Tl,j Tr,0 ∈ inτ (I2 (Ba ) \ p′ . Hence the
image of inτ (I2 (Ba )) in the quotient ring T /p′ is not zero. If l = r, then 0 < ju ≤ . . . ≤ ji < ar
for some u, i with 1 ≤ u ≤ i ≤ n − 1. Thus we can assume that
Tl,j = Tr,ar ,...,ar ,ji ,...,ju ,0,...,0 6∈ p′ .
Therefore the element Tl,j appears at least in two columns of the matrix Ba , namely the columns
corresponding to the sequences
r, ar , . . . , ar , ji , . . . , ju , 1, . . . , 1
and
r, ar , . . . , ar , ji + 1, . . . , ju + 1, 1, . . . , 1.
2 ∈ in (I (B ) \ p′ . Again the image of in (I (B )) in the quotient ring T /p′ is not zero.
Hence Tl,j
τ 2
a
τ 2
a
Hence dim T /I2 (Ba ) = dim T /inτ (I2 (Ba )) = dim T /p = |U | = r + n − 1 as claimed, where the
second equality follows as I2 (Ba ) is a prime ideal (see for instance [19]).
From the above follows that for any sequence of r positive integers a = a1 , . . . , ar the special
fiber ring of M is defined by the ideal of minors I2 (Ba ), indeed
F(M ) = k ⊗R R(M ) = k ⊗R S/I2 (Ca ) = T /I2 (Ba ).
For any sequence a the ideals I2 (Ca ) and I2 (Ba ) have a Gröbner basis of quadrics according
to Lemma 2.6, hence both the Rees algebra and the special fiber ring of M are Koszul domains.
Normality follows because F(M ) is a direct summand of R(M ) which in turn is a direct summand
of R[t1 , . . . , tr ]. The latter claim can be easily seen once we consider R(M ) as a Nr+1 −graded
R[t1 , . . . , tr ]-algebra.
In the rest of this section we study the divisor class group of the normal domain A = Ta /I2 (Ba )
for any sequence a.
Definition 2.10. Let K be the A-ideal generated by all the variables appearing in the first row of
Ba , i.e. all the variables Tl,j with 1 ≤ l ≤ r and j ∈ Ja′l .
Theorem 2.11. The divisor class group Cl(A) is cyclic generated by K.
Proof. To compute the divisor class group we use Nagata’s Theorem: If W ⊂ A is a multiplicatively
closed set, then there is an exact sequence of Abelian groups
0 −→ U −→ Cl(A) −→ Cl(AW ) −→ 0 ,
8
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
where U is the subgroup of Cl(A) generated by
{[p] | p a height one prime ideal with p ∩ W 6= ∅} .
i
i
| i ∈ Z}. Notice Tr,ar 6∈ I2 (Ba ). Hence
= Tr,a
We use the above theorem with W = {Tr,a
r
r ,··· ,ar
Tr,ar is regular on T /I2 (Ba ). After localizing at Tr,ar the ideal I2 (Ba )Tr,ar is isomorphic to an ideal
generated by variables, and the ring ATr,ar is a polynomial ring, hence factorial. Thus Cl(AW ) = 0
and Cl(A) = U .
Now we will show that U is cyclic generated by K. Notice that [K] ∈ U because K is a
prime ideal of height one containing Tr,ar . Clearly, Tr,ar ∈ K. To show that A/K is a domain
of dimension dim A − 1, let R′ = k[x2 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring over k in n − 1 variables,
let m′ be its homogeneous maximal ideal, and let M ′ = m′a1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ m′ar . The claim follows by
∼ F(M ′ ) and F(M ′ ) is a domain of dimension n − 1 + r − 1 = dim A − 1.
Theorem 2.4 as A/K =
Let P be the A-ideal generated by all the variables Tr,j with j ∈ Jar . Clearly, P is prime. Indeed,
∼ F(Ma′ ) with a′ =
if r = 1, then A/P = k; if r > 1, then, according to Theorem 2.4, A/P =
a1 , . . . , ar−1 . Furthermore, if r > 1, P has height one as dim A/P = dim F(Ma′ ) = dim A − 1.
Next we show that every prime ideal p in A containing Tr,ar contains either K or P . Assume
that K 6⊂ p, then there exists a variable Tl,i 6= Tr,ar with i ∈ Ja′l that is not in p. Recall that the
set of multi indices Jar is ordered by τ . For all j ∈ Jar we show that Tr,j ∈ p by descending
induction on Jar . The base case is trivial since Tr,ar ∈ p. Assume Tr,j 6= Tr,ar . Then there exists a
multi-index s ∈ Jar with s > j such that the equality
Tr,j Tl,i = Tr,s Tl,i,t
holds in A for some integer t ≥ 2. Notice that Tl,i,t is well defined because i ∈ Ja′l . By induction
Tr,s ∈ p, thus Tr,j ∈ p since p is prime and Tl,i 6∈ p. Hence P ⊂ p.
If r = 1 the above inclusion implies that ht p > 1 and hence U is cyclic generated by K. If
r > 1, then U is generated by P and K. We conclude by showing that [P ] = ar [K], or equivalently,
P = (Tr,ar ) :A K ar . Since both ideals have height one and P is prime it is enough to prove the
inclusion P ⊂ (Tr,ar ) :A K ar . The latter follows from the equation
(3)
Tr,j K ar −j1 ∈ (Tr,ar ) .
We prove equation (3) using descending induction on j1 with 0 ≤ j1 ≤ ar . The base case is trivial
since j1 = ar implies Tr,j = Tr,ar . If j1 < ar , then the variable Tr,j appears in a row s of Ba with
s > 1. Thus for any element λ ∈ K there exists β ∈ S such that the equality
Tr,j λ = Tr,jn−1 ,··· ,js+1 ,js +1,··· ,j1 +1 β
holds in A. Now the claim follows by induction.
According to Theorem 2.11 the classes of the divisorial ideals K (δ) and P (δ) , the δ-th symbolic
power of K and P respectively, constitute Cl(A). In the next theorem we exhibit a monomial
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
9
generating set for K (δ) for δ ≥ 1. As in [20] and [25] we identify K (δ) with a graded piece of A.
We put a new grading on the ring T ,
Deg(Tl,j ) = j1 .
Notice that I2 (Ba ) is an homogeneous ideal with respect to this grading. Thus Deg induces a
grading on A. Let A≥δ be the ideal generated by all monomials m in A with Deg(m) ≥ δ.
Theorem 2.12. The δ-th symbolic power of K, K (δ) , equals the monomial ideal A≥δ .
Proof. One proceeds as in [21, 1.5].
3. T HE B LOWUP
ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
In this section our goal is to compute explicitly the defining equations of the blowup algebras of
truncations of complete intersections.
Assumptions 3.1. Let R = k[x1 , . . . , xn ] be a polynomial ring over a field k with homogeneous
maximal ideal m. Let r be an integer with 1 ≤ r ≤ n. Let f1 , . . . , fr be a homogeneous regular
sequence in R of degree d1 ≥ . . . ≥ dr . Let d ≥ d1 be an integer, write ai = d − di . Let I be
the truncation of the complete intersection (f1 , . . . , fr ) in degree d, i.e. the R-ideal generated by
{mai fi | 1 ≤ i ≤ r} ,
I = (f1 , . . . , fr )≥d = (ma1 f1 , . . . , mar fr ).
Theorem 3.2. Adopt assumptions 3.1 and write M = ma1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ mar . There is a short exact
sequence
0 → Q → R(M ) → R(I) → 0
where Q is a prime ideal of height r − 1 in the normal domain R(M ).
Proof. The natural map
ζ
M
−→
(u1 , . . . , ur )
7→
I = ma1 f1 + . . . + mar fr → 0
u1 f1 + . . . + ur fr
induces a surjection on the level of Rees algebras
Ψ : R(M ) −→ R(I)
and Ker Ψ is a prime of height r − 1 since R(M ) and R(I) are domains and dim R(M ) = n + r =
dim R(I) + r − 1.
10
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
Definition 3.3. Adopt assumptions 3.1. Let a be the sequence a1 , . . . , ar and let S be the polynomial ring Sa . Consider the algebra epimorphism χ obtained by the composition of the two algebra
epimorphisms
φ : S −→ R(M )
Ψ : R(M ) −→ R(I)
and
with φ as in (1) and let A be the S-ideal defined by the short exact sequence
χ
0 → A −→ S −→ R(I) → 0 .
Let τ be the order on Tl,j defined in Section 2. Notice that, through the algebra epimorphism χ,
the order τ induces an order on the set
C = xal ,j fl | 1 ≤ l ≤ r, j ∈ Jal
of generators of I. Let ϕ be the presentation matrix of I over R with respect to C. In the following
remark we give a resolution of I when r = 2. In particular, we describe explicitly ϕ.
Remark 3.4. To compute a resolution of I = (f1 , f2 )≥d we first truncate the Koszul complex of
f1 , f2 in degree d.
(1) If d2 ≤ d ≤ d1 + d2 we obtain the short exact sequence:
ρ
ζ
0 −→ R(−d1 − d2 + d) −→ M −→ I −→ 0 ,
−f2
where ζ is the natural surjection described in Theorem 3.2 and ρ =
. Set ϕ′′ to
f1
−f2
be the map that rewrites
in terms of the k-basis B of M ordered with the order
f1
induced by τ . The Eagon-Northcott complex gives us an R-resolution F• of M , while
the complex G• that is trivial everywhere except in degree 0 gives us an R-resolution of
R(−d1 − d2 + d). The map ρ can be trivially lifted to a morphism of complexes
ρ• : G• −→ F•
that is trivial in positive degree and is ϕ′′ in degree zero.
(2) If d ≥ d1 + d2 + 1 we obtain the short exact sequence:
ρ
ζ
0 −→ md−d1 −d2 −→ M −→ I −→ 0 ,
−f2
where ζ is the natural surjection described in Theorem 3.2 and ρ =
. Write E
f1
for the k-bases of md−d1 −d2 ordered with the order induced by τ . Set ϕ′′ to be the map
−f2
that rewrites E
in terms of the k-basis B of M ordered with the order induced
f1
by τ . From the Eagon-Northcott complex we obtain R-resolutions F• and G• of M and
md−d1 −d2 , respectively. The map ρ can be lifted to a morphism of complexes
ρ• : G• −→ F•
with ϕ′′ in degree zero.
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
11
In both cases the mapping cone C(ρ• ) is a non-minimal free resolution of I. In particular, the
presentation matrix of I with respect to C is ϕ = [ϕ′ , ϕ′′ ] where ϕ′ is the matrix presenting M with
respect to B.
In the following remark we describe explicitly ϕ for any r when d ≥ d1 + d2 .
Remark 3.5. Adopt assumptions 3.1. To compute the presentation matrix for I = (f1 , . . . , fr )≥d
V
we need to truncate the Koszul complex K• (f1 , . . . , fr ) = Re1 ⊕ . . . ⊕ Rer . If d ≥ d1 + d2 then
d ≥ di + dj for any 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r and we have:
M
. . . −→
m
d−di −dj
ei ∧ ej −→ M =
1≤i<j≤r
r
M
mai −→ I −→ 0 .
i=1
md−di −dj ,
Write B and Ei,j for the k-bases of M and of
respectively, ordered with the order induced
′′
by τ . Set ϕ to be the map that rewrites Ei,j (−fj ei + fi ej ) in terms of B for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r. The
presentation matrix of I with respect to C is ϕ = [ϕ′ , ϕ′′ ] where ϕ′ is the matrix presenting M with
respect to B.
Definition 3.6. Adopt assumptions 3.1. Let h1 , . . . , ht ∈ S be the homogeneous polynomials
obtained by the matrix multiplication [T ]ϕ′′ , where ϕ′′ is the matrix described in Remark 3.4 and
3.5. Think of S as a naturally bigraded ring with deg xi = (1, 0) and deg Tj = (0, 1). If r = 2 and
(δ, 1) with δ = d2 −a1 = d1 −a2 = d1 +d2 −d ≥
d1 ≤ d ≤ d1 +d2 , then t = 1 and h1 has bidegree
X σi,j + n − 1
0. For any r, if d ≥ d1 + d2 then t =
with σi,j = d − di − dj ≥ 0 and the
n−1
1≤i<j≤r
hk ’s have bidegree (0, 1).
Proposition 3.7. Adopt assumptions 3.1, 3.6 with d ≥ d1 +d2 then (h1 , . . . , ht )R(M ) is a non-zero
prime ideal of height ≥ r − 1.
Proof. Let 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r. Write
X
λk xdi ,k
fi =
and
fj =
X
αk xdj ,k
k∈Jdj
k∈Jdi
Let σi,j = d − di − dj ≥ 0. As in Definition 2.1, denote the elements of the basis Ei,j of mσi,j with
xσi,j ,t,s , t ∈ Jσ′ i,j . Since we have a one to one correspondence between the hk ’s and the elements
of Ei,j , we write hk as hσi,j ,t,s . Let H be the S-ideal generated by {hσi,j ,t,s | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r, t ∈
Jσ′ i,j , 1 ≤ s ≤ n}. We obtain
X
X
λk xai ,k+t,s
αk xaj ,k+t,s ,
and
xσi,j ,t,s fj =
xσi,j ,t,s fi =
k∈Jdi
k∈Jdj
hence
hσi,j ,t,s =
X
k∈Jdi
λk Ti,k+t,s −
X
k∈Jdj
αk Tj,k+t,s .
12
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
Let Hj be the S-ideal generated by {hσ1,l ,t,s | 2 ≤ l ≤ j, t ∈ Jσ′ 1,l , 1 ≤ s ≤ n}. We show by
induction on j with 2 ≤ j ≤ r that the ideal Hj R(M ) is prime of height ≥ j − 1. Let j = 2. Notice
that for each t ∈ Jσ′ 1,2 , the column [hσ1,2 ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,2 ,t,n ]tr is a linear combination of columns of
P
+n−2
+n−2
Ca . Write Ea for the n × (1 + rq=1 aqn−1
) matrix obtained by Ca by substituting σ1,2n−1
columns with [hσ1,2 ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,2 ,t,n ]tr , t ∈ Jσ′ 1,2 . The two S-ideals I2 (Ca ) + H2 and I2 (Ea ) + H2
are equal. The ideal H2 R(M ) is prime according to Corollary 2.8 as
S/(I2 (Ea ) + H2 ) ∼
= T ′ /I2 (Da )
for some polynomial ring T ′ and Da a suitable submatrix of Ca with n rows. Now degree considerations show that hσ1,2 ,t,s 6∈ I2 (Ca ), hence H2 R(M ) 6= 0. Thus the ideal H2 R(M ) is prime of
height at least one.
Let 2 ≤ l ≤ j and assume by induction that Hj−1 R(M ) is prime of height ≥ j − 2, we show
Hj R(M ) is prime of height ≥ j − 1. For each t ∈ Jσ′ 1,l , the column [hσ1,l ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,l ,t,n ]tr
P
+n−2
is a linear combination of columns of Ca . Write Ea for the n × (1 + rq=1 aqn−1
) matrix
Pj
σ1,l +n−2
tr
columns with [hσ1,l ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,l ,t,n ] , 2 ≤ l ≤ j
obtained by Ca by substituting l=2
n−1
′
and t ∈ Jσ1,l . The two S-ideals I2 (Ca ) + Hl and I2 (Ea ) + Hl are equal. The ideal Hj R(M ) is
prime according to Corollary 2.8 as
S/(Ij (Ea ) + Hj ) ∼
= T ′ /I2 (Da )
for some polynomial ring T ′ and Da a suitable submatrix of Ca with n rows. Notice that for each
t ∈ Jσ′ 1,j , the column [hσ1,j ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,j ,t,n ]tr is a linear combination of a subset of the columns
{(1, t) | t ∈ Ja′1 } and {(j, t) | t ∈ Ja′j } of Ca , while the column [hσ1,l ,t,1 , . . . , hσ1,l ,t,n ]tr is a
linear combination of a subset of the columns {(1, t) | t ∈ Ja′1 } and {(l, t) | t ∈ Ja′l } of Ca
with 2 ≤ l ≤ j − 1. Hence degree considerations show that hσ1,j ,t,s 6∈ (Hj−1 , I2 (Ca )), hence
Hj R(M ) 6= 0. Thus the ideal Hj R(M ) is prime of height ≥ j − 1.
Using the same argument one can show that HR(M ) is a prime ideal and its height is at least
r − 1 as HR(M ) ⊃ Hr R(M ) .
Remark 3.8. If d ≥ d1 +d2 −1, then the ideal I = (f1 , . . . , fr )≥d has a linear resolution. The Rees
algebra of linearly presented ideals of height 2 has been described explicitly in terms of generators
and relations in [18] under the additional assumption that I is perfect. However, if r < n, the
truncations of codimension r complete intersections are never perfect. For large d, the Rees algebra
R(I) is Cohen-Macaulay as shown in [12]. But the defining equations of R(I) were unknown, we
give them explicitly in Theorem 3.9. If r = 2 we prove that for d ≥ d1 + d2 − 1 the Rees ring
R(I) is a Koszul domain (see Corollary 3.13). If r ≥ 3, we prove that R(I) is a Koszul domain
for d ≥ d1 + d2 (see Corollary 3.13). In addition in [16] we study the depth and regularity of the
blowup algebras of I.
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
13
Theorem 3.9. Adopt assumptions 3.1 and 3.6 with d ≥ d1 + d2 then
R(I) = R(Ma )/(h1 , . . . , ht ) = Sa /(I2 (Ca ), h1 , . . . , ht ) .
Proof. Adopt the notation of the proof of Proposition 3.7. Let H be the S-ideal generated by
{hσi,j ,t,s | 1 ≤ i < j ≤ r, t ∈ Jσ′ , 1 ≤ s ≤ n}. According to Remark 3.5, we have H ⊂ A. Hence
HR(M ) ⊂ AR(M ) where the first ideal is a non-zero prime ideal of height ≥ r − 1 by Proposition
3.7 and the second one has height r − 1.
Assume r = 2. In the following theorem we express the Rees algebra of I as defined by a divisor
on the Rees algebra of the module M = ma1 ⊕ ma2 that we computed explicitly in the previous
section. Indeed, for r = 2 the prime ideal Q ∈ Spec(R(M )) of Theorem 3.2 gives rise to an
element of the divisor class Cl(R(M )). This group has been studied explicitly in Theorem 2.11: it
is cyclic generated by the prime ideal L, where L be the R(M )-ideal generated by all the variables
appearing in the first row of Ca . In the next theorem we identify for which s the ideal L(s) is
isomorphic to Q.
Definition 3.10. Let L be the R(M )-ideal generated by all the variables appearing in the first row
of Ca .
We will use the convention that the (symbolic) power of any element or ideal with nonpositive
exponent is one or the unit ideal, respectively.
Theorem 3.11. Adopt assumptions 3.1, 3.6, and 3.10 with r = 2 then
xδ1 AR(M ) = (h1 , . . . , ht )L(δ) .
In particular,
(1) If d1 ≤ d ≤ d1 + d2 − 1 then the R(M )-ideals xδ1 AR(M ) and h1 L(δ) are equal and the
bigraded R(M )-modules A and L(δ) (0, −1) are isomorphic.
(2) If d ≥ d1 + d2 then
R(I) = Sa /(I2 (Ca ), h1 , . . . , ht ) .
Proof. Notice that the first statement follows from (1) and (2) and (2) has been proven in Theorem
3.9. Thus it will be enough to prove (1). Write h = h1 . One proceeds as in [21, 1.11]. For clarity
we rewrite part of the proof here since there are some minor differences and in [21, 1.11] the integer
δ was assumed to be ≥ 2. Degree considerations show that x1 is not in I2 (Ca ). The ideal I2 (Ca )
is prime, so xδ1 is also not in I2 (Ca ). The second assertion in (1) follows from the first as xδ1 has
bi-degree (δ, 0) and h1 has bi-degree (δ, 1). Write to mean image in R(M ). We prove the equality
xδ1 AR(M ) = hL(δ) by showing that A = (h̄/x̄δ1 )L(δ) , where the fraction is taken in the quotient
field Q of R(M ).
14
K. N. LIN AND C. POLINI
Notice that (x̄i1 ) :Q L(i) = (x̄1 , . . . , x̄n )i . This follows as in the proof of claim (1.12) in [21,
1.11]. Furthermore h̄ ∈ mδ = (x̄δ1 ) :Q L(δ) . Thus, h̄L(δ) ⊆ x̄δ1 R(M ). Define D to be the ideal
(h̄/x̄δ1 )L(δ) of R(M ). At this point, we see that the ideal D is either zero or divisorial.
To show that D is not zero and to establish the equality A = D, it suffices to prove that A ⊆ D,
because A is a height one prime ideal of R(M ). This is the only part where the argument differs
from [21, 1.11]. Notice that h̄ ∈ D as x̄1 ∈ L. For every w ∈ m, one has Iw = (f1 , f2 )w . Therefore,
R[It]w = R[(f1 , f2 )t]w and we obtain (h̄)w = Aw . It follows that h̄ 6= 0 and Aw ⊆ Dw . The rest
of the proof follows as in [21, 1.11].
Corollary 3.12. Adopt assumptions 3.1, 3.6, and 2.10.
(a) If d ≥ d1 + d2 then
F(I) = F(Ma )/(h1 , . . . , ht ) = Ta /(I2 (Ba ), h1 , . . . , ht ) .
(b) If r = 2 and d1 ≤ d ≤ d1 + d2 − 1 then
F(I) = Ta /K
with
K∼
= K (δ) (−1).
Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 3.9 and Theorem 3.11 and the fact that F(I) = k ⊗ R(I).
Also the same argument as in [21, 4.2] shows the isomorphism K ∼
= K (δ) (−1).
Corollary 3.13. Adopt assumptions 3.1. If d ≥ d1 + d2 or if r = 2 and d = d1 + d2 − 1, then R(I)
and F(I) are Koszul algebras.
Proof. We will prove the statement for the Rees ring. The same proof works for the special fiber
ring using Corollary 3.12. If d ≥ d1 + d2 , then R(I) = S/(I2 (Ca ), h1 , . . . , ht ) according to
Theorem 3.9, and according to the proof of Corollary 2.8 the latter ring is isomorphic to T ′ /I2 (Da )
for some polynomial ring T ′ and Da a suitable submatrix of Ca with n rows. But this ring is Koszul
as it has a Gröbner of quadrics by Lemma 2.6.
If r = 2 and d = d1 + d2 − 1, then δ = 1 and R(I) = R(M )/AR(M ) ∼
= S/(I2 (Ca ), L)
′
according to Theorem 3.11(1). Let R = k[x2 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring over k in n − 1
variables, let m′ be its homogenoeus maximal ideal, and let M ′ = m′a1 ⊕ m′a2 . The last assertion
now follows from Theorem 2.4 as
R(I) = R(M )/AR(M ) ∼
= S/(I2 (Ca ), L) ∼
= R(M ′ ) .
R EFERENCES
[1] T. Cortadellas Benitez and C. D’Andrea, Rational plane curves parameterizable by conics, J. Algebra, to appear.
[2] L. Busé, On the equations of the moving curve ideal of a rational algebraic plane curve, J. Algebra 321 (2009),
2317–2344.
[3] L. Busé and M. Chardin, Implicitizing rational hypersurfaces using approximation complexes, Journal of Symbolic
Computation 40 (2005), 1150–1168.
REES ALGEBRAS OF TRUNCATIONS OF COMPLETE INTERSECTIONS
15
[4] L. Busé and P. Jouanolou, On the closed image of a rational map and the implicitization problem, J. Algebra 265
(2003), 312–357.
[5] E. Chionh and T. W. Sederberg, On the minors of the implicitization Bézout matrix for a rational plane curve, Comp.
Aided Geom. Design 18 (2008), 92–117.
[6] D. Cox, J. W. Hoffman, and H. Wang, Syzygies and the Rees algebra, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212 (2008), 1787–1796.
[7] D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’Shea, Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms, Undergrad. Texts in Math., Springer-Verlag,
New York-Berlin-Heidelberg, 1992.
[8] D. Eisenbud, Commutative Algebra with a view toward Algebraic Geometry, Grad. Texts in Math., Springer-Verlag,
New York-Berlin-Heidelberg, 1995.
[9] M. Elkadi and B. Mourrain, Residue and Implicitization Problem for Rational Surfaces, Applicable Algebra in
Engineering, Communication and Computing 14 (2004), 361–379.
[10] A. Geramita and A. Gimigliano, Generators for the defining ideal of certain rational surfaces, Duke Math. J. 62
(1991), 61–83.
[11] H. Tài Hà, On the Rees algebra of certain codimension two perfect ideals, Manuscripta Math. 107 (2002), 479–501.
[12] H. Tài Hà and N-V. Trung, Asymptotic behaviour of arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay blow-ups, Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc. 357 (2005), 3655–3672.
[13] J. Hong, A. Simis, and W. V. Vasconcelos, On the homology of two-dimensional elimination, J. Symbolic Comput.
43 (2008), 275–292.
[14] J. Hong, A. Simis, and W. V. Vasconcelos, The equations of almost complete intersections, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc.
(N.S.) 43 (2012), 171–199.
[15] M. Johnson, Second analytic deviation one ideals and their Rees algebras, J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 119 (1997), 171–
183.
[16] K-N. Lin and C. Polini, Algebraic properties of the Rees algebras of truncations of complete intersections, in
preparation.
[17] S. Morey, Equations of blowups of ideals of codimension two and three, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 109 (1996), 197–211.
[18] S. Morey and B. Ulrich, Rees algebras of ideals with low codimension, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 124 (1996), 3653–
3661.
[19] M. Kalkbrener and B. Sturmfels, Initial complexes of prime ideals, Adv. Math. 116 (1995), 365–376.
[20] A. Kustin, C. Polini and B. Ulrich, Divisors on rational normal scrolls, J. Algebra 322 (2009), 1748–1773.
[21] A. Kustin, C. Polini and B. Ulrich, Rational normal scrolls and the defining equations of Rees algebras, J. Reine
Angew. Math. 650 (2011), 23–65.
[22] A. Kustin, C. Polini and B. Ulrich, The bi-graded structure of Symmetric Algebras with applications to Rees rings,
preprint.
[23] J. Ribbe, On the defining equations of multi-graded rings, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), 1393–1402.
[24] L. Robbiano and G. Valla, On the equations defining tangent cones, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 88 (1980),
281–297.
[25] F.-O. Schreyer, Syzygies of canonical curves and special linear series, Math. Ann. 275 (1986), 105–137.
[26] A. Simis, B. Ulrich and W.V. Vasconcelos, Cohen-Macaulay Rees algebras and degrees of polynomial relations,
Math. Ann. 301 (1995), 421–444.
[27] A. Simis, B. Ulrich and W. Vasconcelos, Rees algebras of modules, Proc. London Math. Soc. 87 (2003), 610-646.
[28] B. Ulrich and W. V. Vasconcelos, The equations of Rees algebras of ideals with linear presentation, Math. Z. 214
(1993), 79–92.
[29] W. V. Vasconcelos, On the equations of Rees algebras, J. reine angew. Math. 418 (1991), 189–218.
D EPARTMENT OF M ATHEMATICS AND S TATISTICS , S MITH C OLLEGE , N ORTHAMPTON , M ASSACHUSETTS 01063
E-mail address: [email protected]
D EPARTMENT OF M ATHEMATICS , U NIVERSITY OF N OTRE DAME , N OTRE DAME , I NDIANA 46556
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
1
Anti-jamming Communications Using Spectrum
Waterfall: A Deep Reinforcement Learning
Approach
arXiv:1710.04830v1 [cs.IT] 13 Oct 2017
Xin Liu, Yuhua Xu, Member, IEEE, Luliang Jia, Student Member, IEEE, Qihui Wu, Senior Member, IEEE, and
Alagan Anpalagan, Senior Member, IEEE
Abstract—This letter investigates the problem of anti-jamming
communications in dynamic and unknown environment through
on-line learning. Different from existing studies which need to
know (estimate) the jamming patterns and parameters, we use
the spectrum waterfall, i.e., the raw spectrum environment,
directly. Firstly, to cope with the challenge of infinite state of
raw spectrum information, a deep anti-jamming Q-network is
constructed. Then, a deep anti-jamming reinforcement learning algorithm is proposed to obtain the optimal anti-jamming
strategies. Finally, simulation results validate the the proposed
approach. The proposed approach is relying only on the local
observed information and does not need to estimate the jamming
patterns and parameters, which implies that it can be widely used
various anti-jamming scenarios.
Index Terms—Anti-jamming, Deep Q-Network, Deep Reinforcement Learning
I. I NTRODUCTION
Anti-jamming is always an active research topic, as wireless
transmissions are naturally vulnerable to jamming attacks. The
mainstream anti-jamming techniques includes Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) and Direct-Sequence Spread
Spectrum (DSSS) [1]. Recently, to address the interactions
between the legitimate users and the jammers, game theory has
been widely applied in the literature [2]–[7]. In methodology,
these approaches need to know the jamming strategies, which
implies that the legitimate users are required to estimate the
jamming patterns and parameters from the observed environment. However, with the rapid development of artificial intelligence and universal software radio peripheral (USRP) [8], the
jammers can easily create dynamic and intelligent jamming
attacks. As a consequence, there are two limitations with
regard to estimation-based anti-jamming communications: i)
there may be information loss for unknown jamming patterns,
and ii) if the intelligent jammer switches its strategies dynamically and rapidly, it is not possible to track and react it in real
time. Thus, it is challenging and interesting to investigate antiX. Liu is with the College of Information Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China. (email:leo [email protected]).
Y. Xu and L. Jia are with the College of Communication Engineering,
PLA Army Engineering University, Nanjing 210007, China. (e-mail: [email protected];[email protected]).
Qihui Wu is with the College of Electronic and Information Engineering,
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China (e-mail:
[email protected]).
Alagan Anpalagan is with the Department of Electrical and Computer
Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada ([email protected]).
jamming communication approaches in dynamic and unknown
environment.
To overcome the above limitations, a promising way is
to design new anti-jamming approaches that utilize the raw
environmental information, which is known as spectrum waterfall [9], without estimating jamming patterns and parameters.
These kind of anti-jamming approaches would avoid information loss and adapt to the dynamic environment, as can
be expected. In addition, online learning is an effective way
to solve the decision problems in dynamic environment. The
widely used technique is Q-learning [10], which has been used
in anti-jamming problems [2], [3]. Unfortunately, Q-learning
is not able to deal with the raw environmental information
directly because of the infinite state of the environment.
Motivated by the deep reinforcement learning technique for
learning successful control policies from raw video data in
[11], we investigate the anti-jamming problem in unknown
and dynamic environment. First, the raw spectrum information
is defined as the state of the environment to avoid losing
the jammer information as much as possible. Then, a deep
anti-jamming Q-network (DAQN) is constructed to realize the
direct processing of raw spectrum information. Finally, a deep
anti-jamming reinforcement learning algorithm (DARLA) is
proposed. Simulation results show that the proposed DARAL
achieves the best anti-jamming strategies in various scenarios.
The main contributions are summarized as follows.
•
•
Based on the deep reinforcement learning technique, a
smart anti-jamming communication scheme is proposed.
In particular, the raw spectrum information is defined as a
state, which describes the detail features of jammer more
accurately.
The proposed algorithm is relying only on the locally
observed information and does not need to estimate the
jamming patterns and parameters the jammer in advance,
i.e., it is model-free, which can be widely used in various
anti-jamming scenarios.
Note that the most related work is [12], which also adopted
deep reinforcement learning to investigate the anti-jamming
problems. The main differences in this work are as follows:
i) the environment state is presented by extracting features
of signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) and primary
user occupancy in [12], while it is presented by the raw
spectrum information in this work, and ii) it requires the
jammer to have the same channel-slot transmission structure
2
known as spectrum waterfall [9], as shown in Fig. 2. Taking the
swept jamming as example, we can accurately determine the
frequency range and intensity (color) of jamming at the next
moment by looking at the thermal chart, which also means we
can determine the anti-jamming strategy accordingly.
In the unknown and dynamic environment, we do not
consider estimation-based anti-jamming strategies. Instead,
define St as the environment state, and then consider a
dynamic decision problem in which the agent (anti-jamming
user) interacts with an environment through a sequence of
observations of environment (St ), actions (at ) and rewards
(rt ). Specifically, an action a can be a combination decisions of
frequency, power, coding schemes, spread spectrum, and other
kinds of anti-jamming decisions, e.g., a = (f, p) represents
the combination actions of frequency (f ) and power (p). The
rewards associated with the actions and environment is defined
as:
R(a) − λδ β(a, S) ≥ βth (a)
r(a, S) =
,
(2)
0
β(a, S) < βth (a)
Fig. 1. System model.
Fig. 2. Thermodynamic chart of various jamming pattern.
with the users in [12]. On the contrary, this requirement does
not hold in our work, which makes the proposed approach
more general.
II. S YSTEM M ODEL AND P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
We consider the transmission of one user (a transmitterreceiver pair) against one or several jammers, as shown in
Fig. 1. The agent, which is disposed at the receiving end, sends
anti-jamming strategies to the transmitter through a reliable
control link. Jammers may adopt fixed, random, or possibly
intelligent jamming patterns. However, we do not analyze the
specific jamming models, but obtain the optimal anti-jamming
strategies based on the raw spectrum information.
While the receiver receives the desired signal, the agent
continuously senses the whole communication bands and
stores the sensed values. Denote the spectrum vector as Pt =
{pt,1 , pt,2 , · · · , pt,N }, where pt,n is the power of frequency
n at time t and N is the number of sampling points in
frequency space. In order to sufficiently use history spectrum
information, a two-dimensional matrix, which describes timefrequency features of spectrum environment, is expressed as:
pt−1,1
Pt−1
Pt−2 pt−2,1
St = . = .
.. ..
Pt−M
pt−M,1
pt−1,2
pt−2,2
..
.
···
···
..
.
pt−1,N
pt−2,N
..
.
pt−M,2
···
pt−M,N
. (1)
It is noted that St contains all the spectrum information until
time t, as M tends to infinity. However, the difficulty of the
decision optimization problem is significantly increased with
the increase of M . Therefore, M can take an appropriate value,
which would be determined by the time-varying characteristics
of the spectrum environment.
To illustrate the rationality of using St as the basis of antijamming decision-making, we give the thermodynamic charts
of the St matrix of several common jamming patterns, also
where R(a) is the bit rate when the action a is selected,
λ is the cost when action changes, δ is an indication of
action change (δ = 1 if at 6= at−1 ; δ = 0 if at = at−1 ),
β(a, S) is the received signal to interference plus noise ratio
(SINR) in state S with action a. βth (a) is the required SINR
threshold for successful transmission. Note that R(a) and
βth (a) are modeled as a function of action a, the reason
is as follows: the bit rate and SINR requirements change
for different anti-jamming strategies, such as forward error
correction and spread spectrum schemes.
Then, the goal of the agent is to select anti-jamming actions
in
a fashion that maximizes cumulative future reward Rt =
P∞
i
i=0 γ rt+i+1 , where γ is the discount factor. One way of
achieving this goal is to compute the following optimal actionvalue (also known as Q) function [10]:
Q∗ (S, a) = max E {Rt | St = S, at = a, π},
π
(3)
where the anti-jamming policy π = P (a | S) refers to a
probability distribution over the actions. Based on the Bellman
equation,
n
o
∗
′ ′
Q∗ (S, a) = E r + γ max
Q
(S
,
a
)
|
S,
a
.
(4)
′
a
III. A NTI - JAMMING C OMMUNICATION S CHEME
The traditional Q-learning is unable to cope with the antijamming problem described in section II, as the state space
size of St is almost infinite. In order to solve this problem,
a deep anti-jamming Q-network (DAQN) is constructed to
address the interactive decision-making problem with raw
spectrum information input, which contains decision network
and update network, as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 respectively.
We use a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to approximate the optimal action-value as shown in decision network,
where the input state St is represented by a thermal chart of
M ×N pixels. After the processing of two convolutional layers
and two fully connected layers, the output is the estimated Q
function, where K is the size of action space. At last, the
3
Fig. 3. Decision network of the DAQN.
Algorithm 1: Deep Anti-jamming Reinforcement Learning
Algorithm (DARLA)
Initialize : Set D = ∅, ǫ = 1, Set θ with random weights,
Sense initial environment S1 .
For t = 1, T do
With probability ǫ, select a random action at
otherwise, select at = arg max Q(St , a; θ)
a
Fig. 4. Updating network of the DAQN.
decision layer outputs the corresponding action based on the
estimated Q function.
However, reinforcement learning is known to be unstable or
even to diverge when a nonlinear function approximator [11],
such as the neural network is used to represent the Q function.
The main reason is correlation during the learning process. The
idea of experience replay is adopted to address these instabilities as shown in the update network. To perform experience
replay, we store the agent’s experiences et = (St , at , rt , St+1 )
at each time-step t in data set Dt = (e1 , · · · et ). When the
experience pool is big enough, we construct target values
r + γ max
Q(S′ , a′ ) by randomly choosing elements in a
a′
uniform distribution (S, a, r, S′ ) ∼ U (D), which reduces
the correlation during sequential observation. The Q-learning
update at iteration i uses the following loss function:
i
h
2
Li (θi ) = E(S,a,r,S′ )∼U(D) (yi − Q(S, a; θi )) ,
(5)
where θi is the parameter of Q-network at iteration i and
yi = r + γ max
Q(S′ , a′ ; θi−1 ) is target value computed by
a′
Q-network parameter θi−1 with greedy strategy. By assuming
that yi is the expected output of CNN with network weight θi
when the input is S, we calculate the difference between real
output Q(S, a; θi ) and target value yi to determine the update
of network parameters. Differentiating the loss function with
respect to the weights, we arrive at the following gradient:
∇θi Li (θi ) = E(S,a,r,S′ ) [(yi − Q(S, a; θi )) ∇θi Q(S, a; θi )] .
(6)
According to the gradient descent algorithm, the network
weight θi is updated according to (6). Although there are two
Execute action at and compute rt and observe St+1
Store transitions (St , a, r, St+1 ) in D
If Sizeof (D) > N (Enough amount of transitions)
Sample random minibatch of transistions
(S, a, r, S′ ) from D
Compute yi = r + γ max
Q(S′ , a′ ; θ)
a′
Compute gradient based on Eq.(6) and Update θ
End If
Calculate ǫ = max(0.1, ǫ − ∆ǫ)
End For
CNN networks with different weights, as shown in Fig. 4,
the actual implementation requires only one CNN network, as
the computing of target values and the updating of network
weights are in different stages. The algorithm for anti-jamming
communication based on deep reinforcement learning is presented in Algorithm 1.
IV. N UMERICAL R ESULTS AND D ISCUSSIONS
In the simulation setting, the user and the jammer combat
with each other in a frequency band of 20MHz, where the
frequency resolution of spectrum sensing is 100kHz. The
user performs a full band sensing every 1ms and retains the
spectrum data within the 200ms. Hence, the size of matrix St
is 200 × 200. The bandwidth of user signal is 4MHz, and the
center frequency is allowed to change in each 10ms with the
step of 2MHz, which means K = 9. Both signal and jamming
are raised cosine waveform with roll-off factor α = 0.3, in
which jamming power is 30dBm and signal power is 0dBm.
The demodulation threshold βth at all frequency is set to be
10dB, and the cost of action change λ is set to be 0.2R(a).
Four kinds of jamming patterns are given for simulation: i)
Sweep jamming (sweep speed is 1GHz/s); ii) Comb jamming
(three fixed frequency signals at 2MHz, 10MHz, and 18MHz);
4
1
0.9
Normalized throughput
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
Sweep Jamming
Comb Jamming
Random Jamming
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.5
1
Iteration
1.5
2
4
x 10
Fig. 5. Normalized throughput under different jamming patterns.
and (c) respectively, and the converging states are given in
Fig. 6(d), (e), and (f) respectively. These states that contain
time-frequency information can clearly reflect the past actions
of user and jamming. Taking sweep jamming as an example,
at the beginning of the learning procedure, the user adopts
randomized action as it is unfamiliar with environment (the
locations of rectangular blocks are randomly distributed), and
after convergence, the frequency is properly changed before
the jamming arrives (the rectangular blocks are distributed
according to the slashes).
With regard to the intelligent jamming, since the probability
distribution of user actions is the basis for jammer to release
jamming, the best strategy for user is that the probability of
each action is almost identical. The simulation results in Fig. 7
show the probabilities of each action being selected during the
learning procedure, which is consistent with our analysis.
V. C ONCLUSION
Fig. 6. Environmental states at initial and convergent stages under different
jamming patterns.
0.25
Probability
0.2
0.15
In this letter, we investigated the anti-jamming problem in
unknown and dynamic environment. Aiming at employing the
waterfall spectrum information directly, we constructed a deep
anti-jamming Q-network to handle the complex interactive
decision-making problem with infinite number of states. Then,
a deep anti-jamming reinforcement learning algorithm was
proposed. Using the proposed learning algorithm, the user
is able to learn the best anti-jamming strategy by constantly
trying various actions and sensing the spectrum environment.
Simulation results in various scenarios are presented to validate the proposed anti-jamming communication approach.
Future work on designing multi-user deep anti-jamming reinforcement learning algorithms is ongoing.
R EFERENCES
0.1
0.05
0
10
8
200
6
150
4
100
2
Action index
50
0
0
Iteration/100
Fig. 7. Probability of user actions during learning.
iii) Random jamming (frequency is randomly changed every
20ms with the step of 4MHz); iv) Intelligent jamming (the
jammer continuously observes the probability that the user
signal appears at each frequency point, and chooses the largest
one as jamming channel). For all Jamming patterns, the
instantaneous bandwidth of the jamming is set to be 4MHz.
The normalized average throughput of legitimate user under
different jamming patterns is given in Fig. 5. It is shown
that the anti-jamming ability of user has been improved
significantly with the proposed DARLA learning. Especially in
the case of comb jamming, the normalized throughput is close
to one after convergence, which indicates that the jamming is
almost completely avoided.
Environmental states at initial stages under sweep, comb
and random jamming patterns are given in Fig. 6(a), (b),
[1] L. Zhang, et al.,“United against the enemy: Anti-jamming based on crosslayer cooperation in wireless networks” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 5733-5747, Aug. 2016.
[2] B. Wang, et al.,“An anti-jamming stochastic game for cognitive radio
networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 877-889,
Apr. 2011.
[3] Y. Wu, et al.,“Anti-jamming games in multi-channel cognitive radio
networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 112-118,
Aug. 2011.
[4] M.K. Hanawal, et al.,“Joint adaptation of frequency hopping and transmission rate for anti-Jamming wireless systems” IEEE Trans. Mobile
Computing., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 2247-2259, Sep. 2016.
[5] L. Xiao, et al.,“Anti-jamming transmission stackelberg game with observation errors,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 949-952, Jun.
2015.
[6] L. Jia, et al.,“Bayesian stackelberg game for anti-jamming with incomplete information,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1991-1994,
Oct. 2016.
[7] L. Jia, et al.,“A hierarchical learning solution for anti-jamming stackelberg
game with discrete power strategies,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett.,
doi:10.1109/LWC.2017.2747543.
[8] H.Zhu, et al.,“You can jam but you cannot hide: Defending against
jamming attacks for geo-location database driven spectrum sharing,” IEEE
J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2723-2737, Oct. 2016.
[9] W. Chen, et al.,“Perceptual spectrum waterfall of pattern shape recognition algorithm,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. ICACT 2016, pp. 382 - 389.
[10] C. J. C. H. Watkins, et al.,“Q-learning,” Mach. Learn.,, vol. 8, pp. 279292, 1992.
[11] V. Mnih, et al.,“Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,” Nature,, vol. 518, no. 7540, pp. 529-533, Jan. 2015.
[12] G. Han, et al.,“Two-dimensional anti-jamming communication based on
deep reinforcement learning,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. ICASSP 2017, pp.
2087-2091.
| 7cs.IT
|
arXiv:1706.03568v1 [cs.DS] 12 Jun 2017
Monitoring of Domain-Related Problems in
Distributed Data Streams∗
Pascal Bemmann
Felix Biermeier
Jan Bürmann
Arne Kemper
Till Knollmann
Steffen Knorr
Nils Kothe
Alexander Mäcker
Manuel Malatyali
Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide
Sören Riechers
Johannes Schaefer
Jannik Sundermeier
Heinz Nixdorf Institute & Computer Science Department
Paderborn University, Germany
{pbemmann, felixbm, jbuerman, kempera, tillk, stknorr,
nkothe, amaecker, malatya, fmadh, soerenri, jschaef, janniksu}
@mail.uni-paderborn.de
Abstract
Consider a network in which n distributed nodes are connected to a
single server. Each node continuously observes a data stream consisting of
one value per discrete time step. The server has to continuously monitor
a given parameter defined over all information available at the distributed
nodes. That is, in any time step t, it has to compute an output based
on all values currently observed across all streams. To do so, nodes can
send messages to the server and the server can broadcast messages to the
nodes. The objective is the minimisation of communication while allowing
the server to compute the desired output.
We consider monitoring problems related to the domain Dt defined to
be the set of values observed by at least one node at time t. We provide
randomised algorithms for monitoring Dt , (approximations of) the size
|Dt | and the frequencies of all members of Dt . Besides worst-case bounds,
we also obtain improved results when inputs are parameterised according
to the similarity of observations between consecutive time steps. This
parameterisation allows to exclude inputs with rapid and heavy changes,
which usually lead to the worst-case bounds but might be rather artificial
in certain scenarios.
∗ This
work was partially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within
the Priority Program “Algorithms for Big Data” (SPP 1736) and by the Federal Ministry of
Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the poject “Resilience by Spontaneous Volunteers
Networks for Coping with Emergencies and Disaster” (RESIBES), (grant no 13N13955 to
13N13957).
1
1
Introduction
Consider a system consisting of a huge amount of nodes such as a distributed
sensor network. Each node continuously observes its environment and measures information such as temperature, pollution or similar parameters. Given
such a system, we are interested in aggregating information and continuously
monitoring properties describing the current status of the system at a central
server. To keep the server’s information up to date, the server and the nodes
can communicate with each other. In sensor networks, however, the amount
of such communication is particularly crucial, as communication translates to
energy consumption, which determines the overall lifetime of the network due
to limited battery capacities. Therefore, algorithms aim at minimizing the communication required for monitoring the respective parameter at the server.
One very basic parameter is the domain of the system defined to be the values currently observed across all nodes. We consider different notions related to
the domain and propose algorithms for monitoring the domain itself, (approximations of) its size and (approximations of) the frequencies of values comprising
the domain, respectively. Each of these parameters can provide useful information, e.g. the information about the (approximated) frequency of each value
allows to approximate very precisely the histogram of the observed values, and
this allows to determine (approximations of) several functions of the input, e.g.
heavy hitters, quantiles, top-k, frequency moments or threshold problems.
1.1
Model and Problems
We consider the continuous distributed monitoring setting, introduced by Cormode, Muthukrishnan, and Yi in [1], in which there are n distributed nodes,
each uniquely identified by an identifier (ID) from the set {1, . . . , n}, connected
to a single server. Each node observes a stream of values over time and at any
discrete time step t node i observes one value vit ∈ {1, . . . , ∆}. The server is
asked to, at any point t in time, compute an output f (t) which depends on the
′
values vit (for t′ ≤ t, and i = 1, . . . , n) observed across all distributed streams
up to the current time step t. The exact definition of f (·) depends on the
concrete problems under consideration, which are defined in the section below.
For the solution of these problems, we are usually interested in approximation
algorithms. An ε-approximation of f (t) is an output f˜(t) of the server such
that (1 − ε)f (t) ≤ f˜(t) ≤ (1 + ε)f (t). We call an algorithm that, for each
time step, provides an ε-approximation with probability at least 1 − δ, an (ε, δ)approximation algorithm. To be able to compute the output, the nodes and the
server can communicate with each other by exchanging single cast messages or
by broadcast messages sent by the server and received by all nodes. Both types
of communication are instantaneous and have unit cost per message. That is,
sending a single message to one specific node incurs cost of one and so does one
broadcast message. Each message has a size of O(log ∆ + log n + log log 1δ ) bits
and will usually, besides a constant number of control bits, consist of a value
from {1, . . . , ∆}, a node ID and an identifier to distinguish between messages
of different instances of an algorithm applied in parallel (as done when using
standard probability amplification techniques). Having a broadcast channel is
an extension to [1], which was originally proposed in [2] and afterwards applied
in [7, 8]. For ease of presentation, we assume that not only the server can send
2
broadcast messages, but also the nodes. This changes the communication cost
only by a factor of at most two, as a broadcast by a node can always be implemented by a single cast message followed by a broadcast of the server. Between
any two time steps we allow a communication protocol to take place, which may
use polylogarithmic O(logc n) rounds, for some constant c. The optimisation
goal is the minimisation of the communication cost, given by the number of
exchanged messages, required to monitor the considered problem.
1.1.1
Monitoring of Domain-Related Functions.
In this paper, we consider the monitoring of different problems related to the domain of the network. The domain at time t is defined as Dt := {v ∈ {1, . . . , ∆} |
∃i with vit = v}, the set of values observed by at least one node at time t. We
study the following three problems related to the domain:
• Domain Monitoring. At any point in time, the server needs to know
the domain of the system as well as a representative node for each value
of the domain. Formally, monitor Dt = {v1 , . . . , v|Dt | } ⊆ {1, . . . , ∆}, at
any point t in time. Also, maintain a sequence Rt = (j1 , . . . , j∆ ) of nodes
such that for all observed values v ∈ Dt a representative i is determined
with jv = i and vit = v. For each value v ∈
/ Dt which is not observed, no
representative is given and jv = nil.
• Frequency Monitoring. For each v ∈ Dt monitor the frequency |Ntv |
of nodes in Ntv := {i ∈ {1, . . . , n} | vit = v} that observed v at t, i.e. the
number of nodes currently observing v.
• Count Distinct Monitoring. Monitor |Dt |, i.e. the number of distinct
values observed at time t.
We provide an exact algorithm for the Domain Monitoring Problem and (ε, δ)approximations for the Frequency and Count Distinct Monitoring Problem.
1.2
Our Contribution
P
For the Domain Monitoring Problem, an algorithm which uses Θ( t∈T |Dt |)
messages on expectation for T time steps is given in Section 2. This is asymptotically optimal in the worst-case in which Dt ∩ Dt+1 = ∅ holds for all t ∈ T .
We also provide an algorithm and an analysis based on the minimum possible
number R∗ of changes of representatives for a given input. It exploits situations
where Dt ∩ Dt+1 6= ∅ and uses O(log n · R∗ ) messages on expectation.
For an (ε,δ)-approximation of the Frequency Monitoring Problem for T time
P
steps, we first provide an algorithm using Θ( t∈T |Dt | ε12 log |Dδt | ) messages on
expectation in Section 3. We then improve this bound for instances in which
observations between consecutive steps have a certain similarity. That is, for
inputs fulfilling the property that for all v ∈ {1, . . . , ∆} and some σ ≤ 1/2,
the number of nodes observing v does not change by a factor larger than σ
between consecutive time steps, we provide an algorithm that uses an expected
amount of O(|D1 |(max(δ, σ)T + 1) ε12 log |Dδ1 | ) messages. In Section 4, we provide an algorithm using Θ(T · ε12 log δ1 ) messages on expectation for the Count
Distinct Monitoring Problem for T time steps. For instances which exhibit a
certain
similarity an algorithm is presented
which monitors the problem using
log(n)·R∗
1
Θ (1 + T · max{2σ, δ}) |Dt |·ε2 log δ messages on expectation.
3
1.3
Related Work
The basis of the model considered in this paper is the continuous monitoring
model as introduced by Cormode, Muthukrishnan and Yi in [1]. In this model,
there is a set of n distributed nodes each observing a stream given by a multiset
of items in each time step. The nodes can communicate with a central server,
which in turn has the task to continuously, at any time t, compute a function
f defined over all data observed across all streams up to time t. The goal is to
design protocols aiming at the minimisation of the number of bits communicated
between the nodes and the server. In [1], the monitoring of several functions
is studied in their (approximate) threshold variants, in which the server has to
output 1 if f ≥ τ and 0 if f ≤ (1 − ε)τ
given τ and ε. Precisely, algorithms
P , for
p
m
where
mi denotes the frequency of
for the frequency moments Fp =
i
i
item i for p = 0, 1, 2 are given. F1 represents the simple sum of all items
received so far and F0 the number of distinct items received so far. Since the
introduction of the model, monitoring of several functions has been studied
such as the monitoring of frequencies and ranks by Huang, Yi and Zhang in
[5]. The frequency of an item i is defined to be the number of occurrences of i
across all streams up to the current time. The rank of an item i is the number
of items smaller than i observed in the streams. Frequency moments for any
p > 2 are considered by Woodruff and Zhang in [9]. A variant of the Count
Distinct Monitoring Problem is considered by Gibbons and Tirthapura in [4].
The authors study a model in which each of two nodes receives a stream of
items and at the end of the streams a server is asked to compute F0 based on
both streams. A main technical ingredient is the use of so called public coins,
which, once initialized at the nodes, provide a way to let different nodes observe
identical outcomes of random experiments without further communication. We
will adopt this technique in Section 4. Note that the previously mentioned
problems are all defined over the items received so far, which is in contrast to
the definition of monitoring problems which we are going to consider and which
are all defined only based on the current time step. This fact has the implication
that in our problems the monitored functions are no longer monotone, which
makes its monitoring more complicated.
Concerning monitoring problems in which the function tracked by the server
only depends on the current time step, there is also some previous work to
mention. In [6], Lam, Liu and Ting study a setting in which the server needs
to know, at any time, the order type of the values currently observed. That
is, the server needs to know which node observes the largest value, second
largerst value and so on at time t. In [10], Yi and Zhang consider a system only
consisting of one node connected to the server. The node continuously observes
a d-dimensional vector of integers from {1, . . . , ∆}. The goal is to keep the
server informed about this vector up to some additive error per component. In
[3], Davis, Edmonds and Impagliazzo consider the following resource allocation
problem: n nodes observe streams of required shares of a given resource. The
server has to assign, to each node, in each time step, a share of the resource
that is as least as large as the required share. The objective is then given by
the minimization of communication necessary for adapting the assignment of
the resource over time.
4
2
The Domain Monitoring Problem
We start by presenting an algorithm to solve the Domain Monitoring Problem
for a single time step. We analyse the communication cost using standard worstcase analysis and show tight bounds. By applying the algorithm for each time
step, we then obtain tight bounds for monitoring the domain for any T time
steps. The basic idea of the protocol as given in Algorithm 1 is quite simple:
Applied at a time t with a value v ∈ {1, . . . , ∆}, the server gets informed whether
v ∈ Dt holds or not. To do so, each node i with vit = v essentially draws a value
from a geometric distribution and then those nodes having drawn the largest
such value send broadcast messages. By this, one can show that on expectation
only a constant number of messages is sent.
Furthermore, if applied with v = nil, the server can decide whether v ′ ∈ Dt
for all v ′ ∈ {1, . . . , ∆} at once with Θ(|Dt |) messages on expectation. To this
end, for each v ′ ∈ {1, . . . , ∆} independently, the nodes i with vit = v ′ drawing the
largest value from the geometric distribution send broadcast messages. In the
presentation of Algorithm 1, we assume that vit = v is always true if v = nil.
Also, in order to apply it to a subset of nodes, we assume that each node
maintains a value statusi ∈ {0, 1} and only nodes i take part in the protocol
for which statusi = status holds.
Algorithm 1 ConstantResponse(v, status)
[for fixed time t]
1. Each node i for which statusi = status and (v 6= nil ⇒ vit = v) hold,
draws a value ĥi from a geometric distribution with success probability
p := 1/2.
2. Let hi = min{log n, ĥi }.
3. Node i broadcasts its value in round log n−hi unless a node i′ with vit = vit′
has broadcasted before.
We have the following lemma, which bounds the expected communication
cost of Algorithm 1 and has already appeared in a similar way in [8] (Lemma III.1).
Lemma 2.1. Applied for a fixed time t, ConstantResponse(v, 1) uses Θ(1)
messages on expectation if v 6= nil and Θ(|Dt |) otherwise.
Proof. First consider the case where v 6= nil. Regarding the expected communication of ConstantResponse(v, 1) we introduce some notation. Let Xi be
a {0, 1}-random variable P
indicating whether the node i ∈ Ntv sends a message
to the server, and X :=
Xi . According to the algorithm a sensor i sends a
message if and only if its height hi matches the round specified for that height
and no other sensor i′ has sent its value beforehand. We obtain
Pr [Xi = 1] = Pr [∃r ∈ {1, . . . , log n} : hi = r ∧ ∀i′ ∈ Ntv \ {i} : hi′ ≤ r]
nv −1
log
Xn 1
1
1− r
.
≤
2r
2
r=1
We know that E[Xi ] = Pr [Xi = 1] and thus
v
E[X] ≤ n ·
log
Xn
r=1
1
2r
5
nv −1
1
1− r
.
2
nv −1
has only one extreme point and
Observing that f (r) = nv · 21r 1 − 21r
f (r) ≤ 2 for all r ∈ [0, log(n)], we use the integral test for convergence to obtain
nv −1
nv −1
Z log n
1
1
1
v
E[X] ≤ n ·
1− r
1− r
≤n
dr + 2
2
2r
2
0
r=1
"
nv #log n
1
1
1
1− r
+2≤
+ 2 < 4.
≤
ln (2)
2
ln (2)
v
log
Xn
1
2r
0
For the case v = nil we can apply the same argumentation independently
for each value v ∈ Dt . This concludes the proof of the lemma.
In order to solve the domain monitoring problem for T time steps, the server
proceeds as follows: In each step t the server calls ConstantResponse(nil, 1)
to identify all values belonging to Dt as well as a valid sequence Rt . By the
previous lemma we then have an overall communication cost
Pof Θ(|Dt |) for each
time step t. For monitoring T time steps, the cost is Θ( t∈T |Dt |). This is
asymptotically optimal in the worst-case
P since on instances where Dt ∩Dt+1 = ∅
for all t, any algorithm has cost Ω( t∈T |Dt |).
Theorem 2.2. Using ConstantResponse(v,
P 1), the Domain Monitoring Problem for T time steps can be solved using Θ( t∈T |Dt |) messages on expectation.
A Parameterised Analysis
Despite the optimality of the result, the strategy of computing a new solution
from scratch in each time step seems unwise and the analysis does not seem to
capture the essence of the problem properly. It often might be the case that
there are some similarities between values observed in consecutive time steps
and particularly, that Dt ∩ Dt+1 6= ∅. In this case, there might be the chance
to keep a representative for several consecutive time steps, which should be
exploited. Due to these observations we next define a parameter describing this
behavior and provide a parameterised analysis. To this end, we consider the
number of component-wise differences in the sequences of nodes Rt−1 and Rt
and call this difference the number of changes of representatives in time step t.
Let R∗ denote the minimum possible number of changes of representatives (over
all considered time steps T ). The formal description of our algorithm is given in
Algorithm 2. Roughly speaking, the algorithm defines, for each value v, phases,
where a phase is defined as a maximal time interval during which there exists one
node observing value v throughout the entire interval. Whenever a node being
a representative for v changes its observation, it informs the server so that a
new representative can be chosen (from those observing v throughout the entire
phase, which is indicated by statusi = 1). If no new representative is found
this way, the server tries to find a new representative among those observing v
and for which statusi = 0 and ends the current phase. Additionally, if a node
observes a value v at time t for which v ∈
/ Dt , a new representative is determined
among these nodes. Note that this requires each node to store Dt at any time
t and hence a storage of O(∆).
6
Algorithm 2 DomainMonitoring
(Node i)
1. Define statusi := 1.
2. If at some time t, vit 6= vit−1 , then
2.1. If vit ∈
/ Dt−1 , set statusi = 0 and apply ConstantResponse(vit , 0).
t
2.2. If vi ∈ Dt−1 , set statusi = 0. Additionally inform server in case i ∈ Rt−1 .
2.3. If server starts a new phase for v = vit , set statusi = 1.
(Server)
[Initialisation]
Call ConstantResponse(nil, 1) to define D0 and for each v ∈ D0 choose a representative uniformly at random from all nodes which have sent v.
[Maintaining Dt and Rt at time t]
Start with Dt = Dt−1 and Rt = Rt−1 and apply the following rules:
• [Current Phase, (try to) find new representative]
If informed by representative of a value v ∈ Dt−1 ,
1) Call ConstantResponse(v, 1).
2) If node(s) respond(s), choose new representative among the responding
sensors uniformly at random.
3) Else call ConstantResponse(v, 0). End current phase for v and, if there
is no response, delete v from Dt and the respective representative from Rt .
• [If ConstantResponse(v, 0) leads to received message(s), start new phase]
Start a new phase for value v if message from an application of ConstantResponse(v, 0) (by Step 3) initialised by the server or initialised in Step 2.1. by a
node) is received. Add or replace respective representative in Rt by choosing a
node uniformly at random from those responding to ConstantResponse(v, 0).
Theorem 2.3. DomainMonitoring as described in Algorithm 2 solves the
Domain Monitoring Problem using O(log n·R∗ ) messages on expectation, where
R∗ denotes the minimum possible number of changes of representatives.
S
Proof. We consider each value v ∈ t Dt separately. Let Nt1 ,t2 := {i | vit =
v ∀t1 ≤ t ≤ t2 } denote the set of nodes that observe the value v at each point
in time t with t1 ≤ t ≤ t2 . Consider a fixed phase for v and let t1 and t2 be
the points in time where the phase starts and ends, respectively. A phase only
ends in Step 3), hence there was no response from ConstantResponse(v, 1),
for v we can associate a cost of
which implies Ntv1 ,t2 = ∅. Thus, to each phase S
at least one to R∗ and this holds for each v ∈ t Dt . Therefore, R∗ is at least
the overall number of phases of all values.
Next we analyze the expected cost of Algorithm 2 during the considered
phase for v. Let w.l.o.g. Nt1 := Nt1 ,t1 = {1, 2, . . . , k}. With respect to the
fixed phase, only nodes in Nt1 can communicate and the communication is
bounded by the number of changes of the representative for v during the phase.
Let t′i be the first time after t1 at which node i does not observe v. Let the
nodes be sorted such that i < j implies t′i ≥ t′j . Let a1 , . . . , am be the nodes
Algorithm 2 chooses as representatives in the considered phase. We want to
show that E[m] = O(log k). To this end, partition the set of time steps t′i
into groups Gi . Intuitively, Gi represents the time steps in which the nodes
7
continuously observe value v since time t1 and the size of the initial set of
nodes that observed v is halved i times. Formally, Gi contains all time steps
tℓi−1 +1 , . . . , tℓi (where ℓ−1 := 0 for convenience) such that ℓi is the largest integer
fulfilling |Nt1 ,t′ℓ | ∈ (k/2i+1 , k/2i ].
i
Let Si be the numberPof changes of representatives in time steps belonging
log k
to Gi . We have E[m] = i=0 E[Si ]. Consider a fixed Si . Let Ej be the event
that the j-th representative
chosen in time steps belonging to Gi is the first one
k
⌋ . Observe that as soon as this happens, the
with an index in 1, . . . , ⌊ 2i+1
respective representative will be the last one chosen in a time step belonging to
group Gi .
Now, since the
algorithm chooses a new representative uniformly at random
from the index set 1, . . . , ⌊ 2ki ⌋ , the probability that it chooses a representative
k
from 1, . . . , ⌊ 2i+1
⌋ is at least 1/2 except for the first representative of v, where
it might be slightly smaller due to rounding errors. Ej occurs only if the first
j−2
j − 1 representatives were each not chosen from this set, i.e. Pr [Ej ] ≤ 12
.
P
P
P
j
= O(1).
Hence, E[Si ] = j E[Si |Ej ] · Pr[Ej ] ≤ j j · ( 12 )j−2 = j 2j−2
3
The Frequency Monitoring Problem
In this section we design and analyse an algorithm for the Frequency Monitoring
Problem, i.e. to output (an approximation) of the number of nodes currently
observing value v. We start by considering a single time step and present an
algorithm which solves the subproblem to output the number of nodes that observe v within a constant multiplicative error bound. Afterwards, and based on
this subproblem, a simple sampling algorithm is presented which solves the Frequency Monitoring Problem for a single time step up to a given (multiplicative)
error bound and with demanded error probability.
While in the previous section we used the algorithm ConstantResponse
with the goal to obtain a representative for a measured value, in this section
we will use the same algorithm to estimate the number of nodes that measure
a certain value v. Observe that the expected maximal height of the geometric
experiment increases with a growing number of nodes observing v. We exploit
this fact and use it to estimate the number of nodes with value v, while still
expecting constant communication cost only. For a given a time step t and a
value v ∈ Dt , we define an algorithm ConstantFactorApproximation as
follows: We apply ConstantResponse(v, 1) with statusi = 1 for all nodes i.
If the server receives the first response in communication round r ≤ log n, the
algorithm outputs ñvconst = 2r as the estimation for |Ntv |.
We show that we compute a constant factor approximation with constant
probability. Then we amplify this probability using multiple executions of the
algorithm and taking the median (of the executions) as a final result.
Lemma 3.1. The algorithm ConstantFactorApproximation estimates the
number |Ntv | of nodes observing the value v at time t up to a factor of 8, i.e.
ñvconst ∈ [|Ntv |/8, |Ntv | · 8] with constant probability.
Proof. Let nv be the number of nodes currently observing value v, i.e. nv :=
|Ntv |. Recall that the probability for a single node to draw height h is Pr[hi =
h] = 21h , if h < log n, and Pr[hi = h] = 22h , if h = log n. Hence, Pr[hi ≥ h] =
1
for all h ∈ {1, . . . , log n}.
2h−1
8
We estimate the probability of the algorithm to fail, by analysing the cases
that ñvconst is larger than log nv + 3 or smaller than log nv − 3. We start with
the first case and by applying a union bound we obtain:
Pr[∃i : hi > log nv + 3] ≤ Pr[∃i : hi ≥ ⌈log nv ⌉ + 3]
⌈log nv ⌉+2
1
1
v
=n ·
≤ .
2
4
For the latter case we bound the probability that each node has drawn a
height strictly smaller than log nv − 3 by
Y
Pr[hi < ⌈log nv ⌉ − 3]
Pr[∀i : hi < log nv − 3] ≤
i
= 1−
1
2⌈log nv ⌉−4
nv
≤
8
1− v
n
nv
≤
1
.
e8
Thus, the probability that we compute an 8-approximation is bounded by
v
n
v
hi
Pr
≤ 2 ≤ 8n = 1 − Pr[∃i : hi > log nv + 3] + Pr[∀i : hi < log nv − 3]
8
1
1
> 0.7
+
≥1−
4 e8
We apply an amplification technique to boost the success probability to arbitrary 1 − δ ′ using Θ(log δ1′ ) parallel executions of the ConstantFactorApproximation algorithm and choose the median of the intermediate results as
the final output.
Corollary 3.2. Applying Θ log δ1′ independent, parallel instances of ConstantFactorApproximation, we obtain a constant factor
approximation of
|Ntv | with success probability at least 1 − δ ′ using Θ log δ1′ messages on expectation.
1
Proof. Choose d = 45
2 ln δ ′ to be the number of copies of the algorithm and
return the median of the intermediate results. Let Ij be the indicator variable
for the event that the j-th experiment does not result in an 8-approximation.
By Lemma 3.1 the failure probability can be upper bounded by a constant, i.e.
Pr [Ij ] ≤ 0.3. Hence, using a Chernoff bound, the probability that at least half
of the experiments do meet the required approximation factor of 8 is
d
d
X
X
2
1
· 0.3 · d
Ij ≥ 1 +
Pr
Ij ≥ d ≤ Pr
2
3
j=1
j=1
2 1
· 3 ·0.3·d
≤ e −( 3 )
2
2
2
45
= e− 45 ·d = e− 45 · 2
ln
1
δ′
= δ′ .
Observe that if at least half of the intermediate results are within the demanded
error bound, so is the median. Thus, the algorithm produces an 8-approximation
of |Ntv | with success-probability of at least 1 − δ ′ , concluding the proof.
9
To obtain an (ε, δ)-approximation, in Algorithm 3 we first apply the ConstantFactorApproximation algorithm to obtain a rough estimate of |Ntv |.
It is used to compute a probability p, which is broadcasted to the nodes, so
that every node observing value v sends a message with probability p. Since
the ConstantFactorApproximation result ñvconst in the denominator of p
is close to |Ntv |, the number of messages sent on expectation is independent of
|Ntv |. The estimated number of nodes observing v is then given by the number
of responding nodes n̄v divided by p, which, on expectation, results in |Ntv |.
Algorithm 3 EpsilonFactorApprox(v ∈ Dt , ε, δ)
(Node i)
1. Receive p from the server.
2. Send a response message with probability p.
[for fixed time t]
(Server)
1. Set δ ′ := δ3
2. Call ConstantFactorApproximation(v,
δ ′ ) to obtain ñvconst .
24
1
3. Broadcast p = min 1, ε2 ñv
· ln δ′ .
const
v
4. Receive n̄ messages.
5. Compute and output estimated number of nodes in Ntv as ñv = n̄v /p.
Lemma 3.3. The algorithm EpsilonFactorApprox as given in Algorithm 3
provides an (ε,δ)-approximation of |Ntv |.
Proof. The algorithm obtains a constant factor approximation ñvconst with probability 1 − δ ′ . The expected number of messages is E [n̄v ] = nv · p.
We start by estimating the conditional probability that more than (1+ε) nv p
responses are sent under the condition that ñvconst ≤ 8nv and p < 1. In this case
we have
3
1
1
24
· ln ′ ≥ 2 v · ln ′ ,
p= 2 v
ε ñconst
δ
ε n
δ
hence using a Chernoff bound it follows
p1 := Pr [n̄v ≥ (1 + ε)nv p |ñvconst ≤ 8nv ∧ p < 1 ] ≤ e−
ε2
3
nv · ε23nv ·ln
1
δ′
= δ′.
Likewise the probability that less than (1 − ε) nv p messages are sent under the
condition that ñvconst ≤ 8nv and p < 1 is
p2 := Pr [n̄v ≤ (1 − ε)nv p |ñvconst ≤ 8nv ∧ p < 1 ]
≤ e−
ε2
2
nv · ε23nv ·ln
1
δ′
3
1
≤ e− 2 ln δ′ < δ ′ .
Next consider the case that ñvconst > 8nv and p < 1 holds. Using
nv
v
v
v
v
v
Pr [ñconst > 8n ] ≤ Pr ñconst > 8n ∨ ñconst <
≤ δ′
8
and pi · Pr [ñvconst ≤ 8nv ] ≤ pi for i ∈ {1, 2},
Pr [(1 − ε)nv p < n̄v < (1 + ε)nv p |p < 1 ]
≥ 1 − (Pr [ñvconst > 8nv ] + (p1 + p2 )) ≥ 1 − 3δ ′ = 1 − δ.
10
For the last case p = 1, we have Pr [(1 − ε)nv p < n̄v < (1 + ε)nv p |p ≥ 1 ] = 1,
by using n̄v = nv . Now, Pr [(1 − ε)nv p < n̄v < (1 + ε)nv p] ≥ 1 − δ directly
follows.
Lemma 3.4. Algorithm EpsilonFactorApprox as given in Algorithm 3 uses
Θ( ε12 log δ1 ) messages on expectation.
Proof. Recall that each of the nv nodes sends a message with probability p,
leading to nv · p messages on expectation. First assume that the constant factor
approximation was successful, i.e. n81 ≤ ñvconst ≤ 8n1 . If p < 1, we have
24
1
24 · 8
1
1
1
.
nv · p = nv 2 v
· ln ′ ≤
·
ln
=
Θ
log
ε ñconst
δ
ε2
δ′
ε2
δ
If p = 1, by definition ε2 ñ24
· ln δ1′ ≥ 1, hence ñvconst = O ε12 · log δ1′ . Thus,
v
const
nv p ≤ 8ñvconst p = O ε12 · log δ1′ .
For the case
constant
factor approximation was not successful,
that the
1
1
v
note that Pr ñvconst < 8·2
holds analogously to the calculation in
≤ e2i+3
in
1
v
Lemma 3.1. Also, for ñvconst ≥ 8·2
n
and
p < 1, we have
i
24
1
1
1
.
nv p ≤ 8 · 2i · ñvconst · 2 v
· ln = 2i · Θ 2 log
ε ñconst
δ
ε
δ
Similarly, for p = 1, we have
nv p ≤ 8 · 2i · ñvconst = 2i · Θ ε12 log δ1 as in this
case, ñvconst = O ε12 · log δ1′ . Hence, we can conclude
1 v
1
1
v
v
· Pr ñconst ≥ n
E [n̄ ] ≤ Θ 2 log
ε
δ
8
∞
X
1
1
1 v
1
i+1
v
v
·
2
·
Θ
Pr
n
≤
ñ
<
n
log
+
const
8 · 2i+1
8 · 2i
ε2
δ
i=0
!
!
∞
∞
X
X
i+3
2i+1
1
1
≤Θ
≤ Θ 2 log
2i+1−2
1+
1+
2i+3
ε
δ
e
i=0
i=0
!
∞
X
1
1
1
1
≤ Θ 2 log
2−i = Θ 2 log
1+
.
ε
δ
ε
δ
i=0
1
1
log
ε2
δ
Theorem 3.5. There exists an algorithm that provides an (ε,δ)-approximation
for the
Frequency Monitoring
Problem for T time steps with an expected number
P
|Dt |
1
messages.
of Θ
t∈T |Dt | ε2 log δ
Proof. In every time step t we first identify Dt by applying ConstantResponse using Θ (|Dt |) messages on expectation. On every value v ∈ Dt we then
perform algorithm EpsilonFactorApprox(v,ε, |Dδt | ), resulting in an amount
of Θ |Dt | ε12 log |Dδt | messages on expectation for a single time step, while
0 |δ
achieving a probability (using a union bound) of 1 − |D
|D0 | = 1 − δ that in one
time step the estimations for every v are ε-approximations. Applied for each of
the T time steps, we obtain a bound as claimed.
11
A Parameterised Analysis
Applying EpsilonFactorApprox in every time step is a good solution in worst
case scenarios. But if we assume that the change in the set of nodes observing
a value is small in comparison to the size of the set, we can do better.
We extend the EpsilonFactorApprox such that in settings where from
one time step to another only a small fraction σ of nodes change the value
they measure, the amount of communication can be reduced, while the quality
guarantees remain intact. We define σ such that
∀t : σ ≥
v
v
|Nt−1
\ Ntv | + |Ntv \ Nt−1
|
.
v
|Nt |
Note that this also implies that Dt = Dt−1 holds for all time steps t, i.e. the
set of measured values stays the same over time.
The extension is designed so that compared to EpsilonFactorApprox,
also in settings with many changes the solution quality and message complexity
asymptotically does not increase. The idea is the following: For a fixed value v,
in a first time step EpsilonFactorApprox is executed (defining a probability
p in Step 3 of Algorithm 3). In every following time step, up to 1/δ consecutive
time steps, nodes that start or stop measuring a value v send a message to the
server with the same probability p, while nodes that do not observe a change in
their value remain silent. In every time step t, the server uses the accumulated
messages from the first time step and all messages from nodes that started
measuring v in time steps 2 . . . t, while subtracting all messages from nodes that
stopped measuring v in the time steps 2 . . . t. This accumulated message count is
then used similarly as in EpsilonFactorApprox to estimate the total number
of nodes observing v in the current time step. The algorithm starts again if a)
1/δ time steps are over, so that the probability of a good estimation remains
good enough, or b) the sum of estimated nodes to start/stop measuring value v
is too large. The latter is done to ensure that the message probability p remains
fitting to the number of nodes, ensuring a small amount of communication,
while guaranteeing an (ε, δ)-approximation.
−
Let n+
t , nt be the number of nodes that start measuring v in time step t or
−
v
v
v
v
that stop measuring it, respectively, i.e. n+
t = |Nt \ Nt−1 |, nt = |Nt−1 \ Nt |,
+
−
and n̄t and n̄t the number of them that sent a message to the server in time
−
step t. In the following we call nodes contributing to n+
t and nt entering and
leaving, respectively.
Lemma 3.6. For any v ∈ D1 , the algorithm ContinuousEpsilonApprox
provides an (ε,δ)-approximation of |Ntv |.
Proof. By the same arguments as in Lemma 3.3, we obtain an (ε,δ ′ )-approximation of n1 . In any further time step we compute our estimate over the sum of
all received messages (n̄1 , arrivals and departures). If too many nodes change
their measured value, we redo a complete estimation of the nodes in Ntv .
Recall that ñt is the random variable giving the estimated number of nodes
−
n̄+
n̄−
by the algorithm, and ñ+
t = p , ñt = p are the random variables giving the
estimated arrivals and departures in that time step. We look at
Ptany time step
−
t > 1 where the restart criteria are not met: Since ñt = ñ1 + i=2 ñ+
i − ñi
and the linearity of expectation, for any time t ≥ 1 we can use a Chernoff bound
as in Lemma 3.3 to show that the estimation is an (ε, δ ′ )-approximation.
12
Algorithm 4 ContinuousEpsilonApprox(v, ε, δ)
(Node i)
1. If t = 1, take part in EpsilonFactorApprox called in Step 2 by the
server.
2. If t > 1, broadcast a message with probability p if vit−1 = v ∧ vit 6= v
or vit−1 6= v ∧ vit = v.
(Server)
1. Set δ ′ := δ 2 .
2. Set t := 1 and run EpsilonFactorApprox(v, ε/3, δ) to obtain n̄1 , p.
3. Output ñ1 = n̄p1 .
4. Repeat at the beginning of every new time step t > 1:
4.1. Receive messages from nodes changing the observed value to obtain
−
n̄+
t and n̄t .
P
Pt
t
+
−
4.2. Break if t ≥ 1/δ or
/p ≥ n̄1 /2.
i=1 n̄i +
i=1 n̄i
Pt
P
t
−
/p.
4.3. Output ñt = n̄1 + i=1 n̄+
i −
i=1 n̄i
5. Go to Step 2.
Using a union bound on the fail probability of up to 1/δ time steps, we get
a 1 − δ1 · δ ′ = 1 − δ probability of having a correct estimation in any time step.
1
1 1
Lemma 3.7. For a fixed value v and T ′ = min{
2σ , δ }, σ ≤ 2 , time steps,
1
1
ContinuousEpsilonApprox uses Θ ε2 log δ messages on expectation.
Proof. The message complexity depends on the initial size |N1v | and on the
number of nodes leaving and entering N v in those time steps, which is bounded
by σ. If EpsilonFactorApprox obtained a correct probability p in Step 1,
i.e. p = Θ( n11 ), the expected number of messages (in case p < 1) is
′
T
T′
X
X
1
1
−
= E n̄1 +
p=Θ
E
n̄+
n̄t p = Θ
i + n̄i
n
n
1
1
t=1
i=2
T′
X
−
n+
p ≤ (n1 + T ′ σn1 ) p
= n1 +
i + ni
i=2
1
1
= n1 (1 + T ′ σ) · 24 · 2 v
ln ′
ε ñconst δ
1
1 1
2
σ · 1/ε log
.
=Θ
1 + min
,
2σ δ
δ
Considering the case where EpsilonFactorApprox estimated wrong, the message complexity could increase greatly if the probability p is too large for the
actual number of nodes (i.e. an underestimation leads to high message complexity). But the probability to misestimate by some constant factor (which
would increase the message complexity by that factor) decreases exponentially
in this factor (as shown in Lemma 3.4 for EpsilonFactorApprox), leaving
13
the expected
number of messages to be Θ
1
1
Θ ε2 log δ .
1 + min
1 1
2σ , δ
σ ·
1
ε2
· log 1δ
=
Theorem 3.8. There exists an (ε,δ)-approximation algorithm for the Frequency
Monitoring
Problem for T consecutive time steps which uses an amount of
Θ |D1 | (1 + T · max{2σ, δ}) ε12 log |Dδ1 | messages on expectation, if σ ≤ 1/2.
Proof. The algorithm works by first applying ConstantResponse(nil,1) to
obtain D1 and then applying ContinuousEpsilonApprox(v, ε, δ/|D1 |) for
every v ∈ D1 . By Lemma 3.6 we know that in every time step and for all v ∈ D1 ,
the frequency of v is approximated up to a factor of ε with probability 1−δ/|D1|.
1 1
We divide the T time steps into intervals of size T ′ = min{ 2σ
, δ } and perform
ContinuousEpsilonApprox on each of them for every value v ∈ D1 . There
are ⌈ TT′ ⌉ ≤ 1+T ·max{2σ, δ} such intervals.
For each of those, by Lemma 3.7 we
|D1 |
1 1
2
messages on expectation for each v ∈
need Θ 1 + min{ 2σ , δ }σ · 1/ε log δ
D1 . This yields a complexity of Θ |D1 | (1 + T · max{2σ, δ}) ε12 log |Dδ1 | due to
1
1 1
, δ }σ ≤ 2σ
· σ = Θ(1). Using a union bound over the fail probability for
min{ 2σ
1 |δ
every v ∈ D1 , a success probability of at least 1 − |D
|D1 | = 1 − δ follows.
By Theorem 3.5, trivially
repeating the
single step algorithm EpsilonFac
|D1 |
1
messages on expectation for T (betorApprox needs Θ T |D1 | ε2 log δ
cause the number of nodes in Ntv for any v ∈ D1 is at least N1v /2 in every
time step of that interval). Hence, the number of messages sent when using
ContinuousEpsilonApprox is reduced in the order of max{2σ, δ}.
4
The Count Distinct Monitoring Problem
In this section we present an (ε,δ)-approximation algorithm for the Count Distinct Monitoring Problem. The basic approach is similar to the one presented
in the previous section for monitoring the frequency of each value. That is, we
first estimate |Dt | up to a (small) constant factor and then use the result to define a protocol for obtaining an (ε, δ)-approximation. If we could assume that,
at any fixed time t, each value was observed by at most one node, it would be
possible to solve this problem with expected communication cost of O( ε12 log δ1 )
(per time step t and per value v ∈ Dt ) using the same approach as in the previous section. Since this assumption is generally not true, we aim at simulating
such behaviour that for each value in the domain only one random experiment
is applied. We apply the concept of public coins, which allows nodes measuring
the same value to observe identical outcomes of their random experiments. To
this end, nodes have access to a shared random string R of fully independent
and unbiased bits. This can be achieved by letting all nodes use the same pseudorandom number generator with a common starting seed, adding a constant
number of messages to the bounds proven below. We assume that the server
sends a new seed in each phase by only loosing at most a constant factor in
the amount of communication used. However, we can drop this assumption by
checking whether there are nodes that changed their value such that only in
14
rounds in which there are changes new public randomness is needed. The formal description of the algorithm for a constant factor and an ε-approximation
are given in Algorithm 5 and Algorithm 6, respectively.
We consider the access of the public coin to behave as follows: Initialised
with a seed, a node accesses the sequence of random bits R bitwise, i.e. after
reading the j’th bit, the node next accesses bit j + 1. Observe the crucial fact
that as long as each node accesses the exact same number of bits, each node
observes the exact same random bits simultaneously. Algorithm 5 essentially
works as follows: In a first step, each node draws a number from a geometrical
distribution using the public coin. By this, all nodes observing the same value
v obtain the same height hv . In the second step we apply the strategy as in
the previous section to reduce communication if lots of nodes observe the same
value: Each node i draws a number gi from a geometrical distribution without
using the public coin. Afterwards, all nodes with the largest height gi among
those with the largest height hv broadcast their height hv .
Algorithm 5 ConstantFactorApproximation
[for fixed time t]
(Node i, observes value v = vi )
1. Draw a random number hv as follows:
Consider the next ∆ · log n random bits b1 , . . . , b∆·log n from R. Let h be
the maximal number of bits bv·log n+1 , . . . , bv·log n+1+h that equal 0. Define
hv := min{h, log n}.
2. Let gi′ be a random value drawn from a geometric distribution with successprobability p = 1/2 and define gi = min(gi′ , log n) (without accessing
public coins).
3. Broadcast drawn height hv in round r = log2 n − (hv − 1) · log n − gi unless
a node i′ has broadcasted before.
(Server)
1. Receive a broadcast message containing height h in round r.
2. Output dˆt = 2h .
Note that only (at most n) nodes that observe value v with hv = maxv′ hv′
may send a message in Algorithm 5. Now, all nodes observing the same value
observe the same outcome of their random experiments determining hv . Hence,
by a similar reasoning as in Lemma 3.1, one execution of the algorithm uses
O(1) messages on expectation.
Using the algorithm given in Algorithm 5 and applying the same idea as in
the previous section, we obtain an (ε, δ)-approximation as given in Algorithm 6:
Each node tosses a coin with a success probability depending on the constant
factor approximation (for which we have a result analogous to Corollary 3.2).
Again, all nodes use the public coin so that all nodes observing the same value
obtain the same outcome of this coin flip. Afterwards, those nodes which have
observed a success apply the same strategy as in the previous section, that is,
they draw a random value from a geometric distribution, and the nodes having
the largest height send a broadcast.
15
Algorithm 6 EpsilonFactorApprox
[for fixed time t]
(Node i)
1/δ
1. Flip a coin with success probability p = 2−q = c log
, q ∈ N as follows:
ε2 dˆt
Consider the next ∆ · q random bits b1 , . . . b∆·q . The experiment is successful if and only if all random bits bv·q+1 , . . . , bv·q+q equal 0. The node
deactivates (and does not take part in Steps 2. and 3.) if the experiment
was not successful.
2. Draw a random value h′i from a geometric distribution and define hi =
min(h′i , log n) (without accessing public coins).
3. Node i broadcasts its value in round log n−hi unless a node i′ with vit = vit′
has broadcasted before.
(Server)
1. Let St be the set of received values.
2. Output d˜t := |St |/p
Using arguments analogous to Lemmas 3.3 and 3.4 and applying EpsilonFactorApprox for T time steps, we obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 4.1. There exists an (ε, δ)-approximation algorithm for the Count
Distinct Monitoring Problem for T time steps using O(T · ε12 log δ1 ) messages on
expectation.
A Parameterised Analysis
In this section we consider the problem for multiple time steps and parameterise
the analysis with respect to instances in which the domain does not change arbitrarily between consecutive time steps. Recall that for monitoring the frequency
from a time step t − 1 to the current time step t, all nodes that left and all nodes
that entered toss a coin to estimate the number of changes. However, to identify
that a node observes a value which was not observed in the previous time step,
the domain has to be determined exactly.
We apply the following idea instead: For each value v ∈ {1, . . . , ∆} we flip
a (public) coin. We denote the set of values with a successful coin flip as the
sample. Afterwards, the algorithm only proceeds on the values of the sample,
i.e. in cases in which a node observes a value with a successful coin flip and
no node observed this value in previous time steps, this value contributes to
the estimate d˜+
t at time t. Regarding the (sample) of nodes that leave the set
of observed values, the DomainMonitoring algorithm is applied to identify
which (sampled) values are not observed any longer (and thus contribute to d˜−
t ).
Analogous to Lemma 3.6, we have the following lemma.
Lemma 4.2. ContinuousEpsilonApprox achieves an (ε,δ)-approximation
of |Dt | in any time step t.
For the number of messages, we argue based on the previous section. However, in addition the DomainMonitoring algorithm is applied. Observe that
the size of the domain changes by at most n/2, and consider the case that this
number of nodes observed the same value v. The expected cost (where the expectation is taken w.r.t. whether v is within the sample) is O(log n · R∗ · p) =
n·R∗
1
O log
|Dt |ε2 log δ . Similar to Theorem 3.8, we then obtain the following theorem.
16
Algorithm 7 ContinuousEpsilonApprox(ε, δ)
1. Compute δ ′ = 2 δ 2
2. Broadcast a new seed value for the public coin.
3. Compute an (ε, δ ′ )-approximation d˜1 of |D1 | using Algorithm 6. Furthermore, obtain the success-probability p.
4. Repeat for each time step t > 1:
4.1. Each node i applies Algorithm 2 if the observed value vi is in the
sample set. Let dˆ−
t be the number of values (in sample set) which
number of nodes that join the sample.
left the domain and dˆ+
t the P
Pt ˆ−
t
˜
˜
4.2. Server computes dt
= d1 + i=2 dˆ+
i /p − i=2 di /p.
Pt ˜+ Pt ˜−
4.3. Break if t = 1/δ or
d +
d /p exceeds d˜1 /2.
i=2
i
i=2
i
5. Set t = 1 and go to Step 2.
Theorem 4.3. ContinuousEpsilonApprox provides and (ε, δ)-approximation for the Count
Distinct Monitoring Problem
for T time steps using an
log(n)·R∗
1
amount of Θ (1 + T · max{2σ, δ}) |Dt |·ε2 log δ messages on expectation, if
σ ≤ 1/2.
References
[1] Graham Cormode, S. Muthukrishnan, and Ke Yi. Algorithms for distributed functional monitoring. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA ’08), pages 1076–1085.
SIAM, 2008.
[2] Graham Cormode, S. Muthukrishnan, and Ke Yi.
Algorithms for
Distributed Functional Monitoring. ACM Transactions on Algorithms,
7(2):21:1–21:20, 2011.
[3] Sashka Davis, Jeff Edmonds, and Russell Impagliazzo. Online Algorithms
to Minimize Resource Reallocations and Network Communication. In
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, and 10th International
Conference on Randomization and Computation (APPROX’06/RANDOM
’06), volume 4110 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 104–115.
Springer, 2006.
[4] Phillip B. Gibbons and Srikanta Tirthapura. Estimating simple functions
on the union of data streams. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM
Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA ’01), pages
281–291. ACM, 2001.
[5] Zengfeng Huang, Ke Yi, and Qin Zhang. Randomized algorithms for tracking distributed count, frequencies, and ranks. In Proceedings of the 31st
ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database
Systems (PODS ’12), pages 295–306. ACM, 2012.
17
[6] Tak Wah Lam, Chi-Man Liu, and Hing-Fung Ting. Online Tracking of
the Dominance Relationship of Distributed Multi-dimensional Data. In
Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA ’10), volume 6534 of Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, pages 178–189. Springer, 2010.
[7] Alexander Mäcker, Manuel Malatyali, and Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide.
Online Top-k-Position Monitoring of Distributed Data Streams. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing
Symposium (IPDPS ’15), pages 357–364. IEEE, 2015.
[8] Alexander Mäcker, Manuel Malatyali, and Friedhelm Meyer auf der Heide.
On Competitive Algorithms for Approximations of Top-k-Position Monitoring of Distributed Streams. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS ’16), pages
700–709. IEEE, 2016.
[9] David P. Woodruff and Qin Zhang. Tight bounds for distributed functional
monitoring. In Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Theory of Computing
(STOC ’12), pages 941–960. ACM, 2012.
[10] Ke Yi and Qin Zhang. Multidimensional online tracking. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 8(2):12, 2012.
18
| 8cs.DS
|
Inverse of a Special Matrix and Application
Thuan Nguyen
arXiv:1708.07795v1 [cs.DM] 25 Aug 2017
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331
Email: [email protected]
Abstract—The matrix inversion is an interesting topic in
algebra mathematics. However, to determine an inverse matrix
from a given matrix is required many computation tools and
time resource if the size of matrix is huge. In this paper, we have
shown an inverse closed form for an interesting matrix which has
much applications in communication system. Base on this inverse
closed form, the channel capacity closed form of a communication
system can be determined via the error rate parameter α.
Keywords: Inverse matrix, convex optimization, channel
capacity.
I. M ATRIX C ONSTRUCTION
In Wireless communication system or Free Space Optical
communication system, due to the shadow effect or the turbulent of environment, the channel conditions can be flipped
from “good” to “bad” or “bad” to “good” state such as
Markov model after the transmission time σ [1] [2]. For
simple intuition, in “bad” channel, a signal will be transmitted
incorrectly and in “good” channel, the signal is received
perfectly. Suppose a system has total n channels, the “good”
channel is noted as “1” and “bad” channel is “0”, respectively,
the transmission time between transmitter and receiver is σ,
the probability the channel is flipped after the transmission
time σ is α. We note that if the system using a binary code
such as On-Off Keying in Free Space Optical communication,
then the flipped probability α is equivalent to the error rate.
Consider a simple case for n = 2, suppose that at the
beginning, both channel is “good” channel, the probability of
system has both of channels are “good” after transmission
time σ, for example, is (1−α)2 . Let call Aij is the probability
of system from the state has i − 1 “good” channels and
n − i + 1 “bad” channels transfers to state has j − 1 “good”
and n − j + 1 “bad” channels. Obviously that 1 ≤ i ≤ n + 1
and 1 ≤ j ≤ n + 1. For example, the transition matrix A2
and A3 for n = 2 and n = 3 are constructed respectively as
follows:
(1 − α)2
A2 = α(1 − α)
α2
(1 − α)3
(1 − α)2 α
A3 =
(1 − α)α2
α3
2α(1 − α)
(1 − α)2 + α2
2α(1 − α)
3(1 − α)2 α
2(1 − α)α2 + (1 − α)3
2(1 − α)2 α + α3
3α2 (1 − α)
α2
α(1 − α) .
(1 − α)2
3α2 (1 − α)
2(1 − α)2 α + α3
2(1 − α)α2 + (1 − α)3
3(1 − α)2 α
given by Proposition 2. Moreover, this matrices are obviously
central symmetric matrix.
Proposition 1. For n channels system, the transition matrix
An has size (n + 1) × (n + 1) and all entries An ij in row i
column j will be established by
An ij =
s=max(i−j,0)
n+1−i
s
i−1
j−i+2s
n−(j−i+2s)
α
(1 − α)
Proof. From the definition, Anij is the probability from state
has i − 1 “good” channels or i − 1 bit “1” transfer to state has
j − 1 “good” channels or j − 1 bit “1”. Therefore, suppose
s is the number channels in i − 1 “good” channels that is
flipped to “bad” channels after the transmission time σ and
0 ≤ s ≤ i − 1. Thus, to maintain j − 1 “good” channels after
the time σ, the number of “bad” channels in n + 1 − i “bad”
channels must be flipped to “good” channels is:
(j − 1) − ((i − 1) − s) = j − i + s
Therefore, the total number of channels are flipped their
state after transmission time σ is:
s + (j − i + s) = j − i + 2s
and the total number of channels that preserves their state after
transmission time σ is n−(j −i+2s). However, 0 ≤ s ≤ i−1.
Similarly, the number of “bad” channels in n + 1 − i “bad”
channels must be flipped to “good” channels should be in
0 ≤ j − i + s ≤ n + 1 − i. Hence:
(
max s = min(n + 1 − j; i − 1)
min s = max(0; i − j)
Therefore, An ij can be determined by below form:
An ij =
j − i + s
s=min(n+1−j,i−1)
X
s=max(i−j,0)
n+1−i
s
i−1
j−i+2s
n−(j−i+2s)
α
(1 − α)
Proposition 2. All the entries of inverse matrix A−1
n given in
Proposition 1 can be determined via original transition matrix
A
n for ∀ α 6= 1/2.
α3
(1 − α)α2
.
(1 − α)2 α
(1 − α)3
These transition matrices are obviously size (n+1)×(n+1)
since the number of “good” channels can achieve n+1 discrete
values from 0, 1, . . . , n. Moreover, these class matrices have
several interesting properties: (1) all entries in matrix An can
be determined by Proposition 1; (2) the inverse of matrix An is
s=min(n+1−j,i−1)
j − i + s
X
An −1
ij =
(−1)i+j
An
(1 − 2α)n ij
Due to the pages limitation, we will show the detailed
proof at the end of this paper. To illustrate our result, an
example of the inverse matrix A2 are shown as follows:
A−1
2
(1 − α)2
1
=
−α(1 − α)
(1 − 2α)2
α2
−2α(1 − α)
(1 − α)2 + α2
−2α(1 − α)
α2
−α(1 − α) .
(1 − α)2
Next, base on the existence of inverse matrix closed form,
we will show that a capacity closed form for a discrete
memory-less channel can be established. We note that in [3],
the authors said that haven’t closed form for channel capacity
problem. However, with our approach, the closed form can be
established for a wide range of channel with error rate α is
small.
II. O PTIMIZE SYSTEM CAPACITY
A discrete memoryless channel is characterized by a channel
matrix A ∈ Rm×n with m and n representing the numbers of
distinct input (transmitted) symbols xi , i = 1, 2, . . . , m, and
output (received) symbols yj , j = 1, 2, . . . , n, respectively.
The matrix entry Aij represents the conditional probability
that given a symbol xi is transmitted, the symbol xj is
received. Let p = (p1 , p2 , . . . , pm )T be the input probability
mass vector, where pi denotes the probability of transmitting
symbol xi , then the probability mass vector of output symbols
q = (q1 , q2 , . . . , qn )T = AT p, where qi denotes the probability
of receiving symbol yi . For simplicity, we only consider the
case n = m such that the number of transmitted input patterns
is equal the number of received input patterns. The mutual
information between input and output symbolsis:
I(X; Y ) = H(Y ) − H(Y |X),
where
H(Y ) =
H(Y |X) =
j=n
X
qj
j=1
m X
n
X
−
log qj
pi Aij log Aij .
i=1 j=1
Thus, the mutual information function can be written as:
I(X; Y ) = −
j=n
X
(AT p)j log (AT p)j +
m X
n
X
pi Aij log Aij ,
i=1 j=1
j=1
where (AT p)j denotes the jth component of the vector
q = (AT p). The capacity C of a discrete memoryless channel
associated with a channel matrix A puts a theoretical maximum rate that information can be transmitted over the channel
[3]. It is defined as:
C = max I(X; Y ).
p
(1)
Therefore, finding the channel capacity is to find an optimal
input probability mass vector p such that the mutual information between the input and output symbols is maximized.
For a given channel matrix A, I(X; Y ) is a concave function
in p [3]. Therefore, maximizing I(X; Y ) is equivalent to
minimizing −I(X; Y ), and the capacity problem can be cast
as the following convex problem:
Minimize:
m X
n
n
X
X
pi Aij log Aij
(AT p)j log (AT p)j −
i=1 j=1
j=1
Subject to:
(
pi 0
1T p = 1
Optimal numerical values of p∗ can be found efficiently
using various algorithms such as gradient methods [4] [5].
However, in this paper, we try to figure out the closed form for
optimal distribution p via KKT condition. The KKT conditions
state that for the following canonical optimization problem:
Problem Miminize: f (x)
Subject to:
gi (x) ≤ 0, i = 1, 2, . . . n,
hj (x) = 0, j = 1, 2, . . . , m,
construct the Lagrangian function:
L(x, λ, ν) = f (x) +
n
X
i=1
λi gi (x) +
m
X
νj hj (x),
(2)
j=1
then for i = 1, 2, . . . , n, j = 1, 2, . . . , m, the optimal point
x∗ must satisfy:
gi (x∗ ) ≤ 0,
∗
hj (x ) = 0,
dL(x,λ,ν)
(3)
|x=x∗ ,λ=λ∗ ,ν=ν ∗ = 0,
dx
∗ ∗
λi xi = 0,
λ∗ ≥ 0.
i
Our transition matrix that is already established in previous
part can represent as a channel matrix. In the optical transmission, for example, the transmission bits are denoted by the
different levels of energy, for example, in On-Off Keying code
bit “1” and “0” is represented by high and low power level.
This energy is received by a photo diode and converse directly
to the voltage for example. However, these photo diode work
base on the aggregate property when collecting all the incident
energy, that said, if two channels transmit a bit “1” then the
photo diode will receive the same energy “2” even though this
energy comes from a different pair of channels. Therefore,
the received signal is completely dependent to the number
of bits “1” in transmission side. Hence, in receiver side, the
photo diode will recognize n + 1 states 0, 1, 2, . . . , n. From
this property, the transition matrix A is the previous section
is exactly the system channel matrix. The channel capacity of
system, therefore, is determined as an optimization problem
in (1).
Next, we will show that the above optimization problem
can be solved efficiently by KKT condition. We note that
our method can establish the closed form for general channel
matrix and then the results are applied to special matrix
An . First, we try to optimize directly with input distribution
p, however, the KKT condition for input distribution is too
complicated to construct the first derivation. On the other hand,
base on the existence of inverse channel matrix, the output
variable is more suitable to work with KKT condition since.
Due to 0 ≤ qj ≤ 1, the Lagrange function from (2) with
output variable q is:
L(qj , λj , νj ) = I(X, Y ) +
j=n
X
j=n
X
qj λj + ν(
qj − 1)
j=1
j=1
Using KKT conditions, at optimal point qj∗ , λ∗j , ν ∗ :
∗
qj ≥ 0
Pj=n ∗
j=1 qj = 1
dI(X, Y )
ν ∗ − λ∗j −
=0
dqj∗
λ∗ ≥ 0
j∗ ∗
λj qj = 0
P
Because 0 ≤ pi ≤ 1, i = 1, . . . , (n) and ni=1 pi = 1, so
Pi=n
always exist pi > 0. From qj = i=1 pi Aij with ∀ Aij > 0,
we can see clearly that qj > 0 with ∀qj or qj∗ > 0 with ∀qj∗ .
Therefore with fifth condition, λ∗j = 0 with ∀λ∗j . Then, we
have simplified KKT conditions:
Pj=n ∗
j=1 qj = 1
dI(X, Y )
=0
ν ∗ −
dqj∗
The derivations are determined by:
j=n
i=n
dI(X, Y ) X −1 X
Aij log Aij − (1 + log qj )
Aji
=
dqj
j=1
i=1
Let call:
i=n
X
A−1
ji
j=n
X
Aij log Aij = Kj
From the second KKT simplified condition, we can compute ∀ qj∗ :
∗
qj∗ = 2Kj −ν −1
And finally:
∗
Due to the channel matrix is a closed form of α, the optimal
input vector p and output vector q also is a function of α.
However, we note that since the KKT condition works directly
to the output variable q, the optimal input p can be invalid
pi > 1 or pi < 0. In next step, our simulations shown that for
n ≤ 10 and α ≤ 0.2, both output and input vector are valid.
That said, our approach will be worked with a good system
where the error probability α is small. In case of the invalid
optimal input vector, the upper bound of channel capacity, of
course, will be established.
III. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, our contributions are twofold: (1) establish an
inverse closed form for a class of channel matrix based on the
error probability α; (2) figure out the closed form for channel
matrix with small error rate α and determine the upper bound
system capacity for a high error rate channel.
R EFERENCES
[1] Jeff McDougall and Scott Miller. Sensitivity of wireless network
simulations to a two-state markov model channel approximation. In
Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003. GLOBECOM’03. IEEE,
volume 2, pages 697–701. IEEE, 2003.
[2] Hong Shen Wang and Nader Moayeri. Finite-state markov channel-a
useful model for radio communication channels. IEEE transactions on
vehicular technology, 44(1):163–171, 1995.
[3] Thomas M Cover and Joy A Thomas. Elements of information theory.
John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
[4] Michael Grant, Stephen Boyd, and Yinyu Ye. Cvx: Matlab software for
disciplined convex programming, 2008.
[5] Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex optimization. Cambridge university press, 2004.
j=1
i=1
A PPENDIX
Next, using derivation of I(X,Y) at qj = qj∗ and last KKT
condition:
ν ∗ = Kj − (1 + log qj ∗ )
Hence:
qj∗ = 2Kj −ν
∗
−1
Next, using first KKT simplified condition, we have the
sum of all output states is 1.
j=n
X
2Kj −ν
∗
−1
=1
j=1
2
ν∗
=
j=n
X
2
Kj −1
j=1
Therefore, ν ∗ can be figured out by:
∗
∗
pT = q T A−1
ij
ν = log
j=n
X
j=1
2Kj −1
Proof for Proposition 2.
Proof. To simplify our notation, the “good” and “bad” channel
are represented by bit “1” and “0”, respectively. Next, we will
use the definition to show that:
An An −1 = I
If matrix A∗n is constructed by A∗nij = (−1)i+j An ij , then
we need to show that:
An A∗n = B = (1 − 2α)n I
Firstly, we note that the An ij and An ∗ij is only different
by sign of the first index (−1)i+j . Therefore, Bij which is
computed by product of row i in matrix An ij and column j
in matrix An ∗ij , can be computed by:
Bij =
k=n+1
X
k=1
An ik A∗nkj
Note that the An ik is the probability from state i “good”
channels (with i − 1 bit “1” and n − i + 1 bit “0”) to medium
state has k “good” channels (with k − 1 bit “1” and n − k + 1
bit “0”). Moreover, if the sign is ignored, then An ∗kj also is
the probability going from state
k to state j, too. However,
n
the state k includes C k−1
sub-states which have a same
number of “good” and “bad” channels. For example with
n = 2, state k = 2 includes two sub-states that contains one
“good” and one “bad” channels are “10” an “01”. Therefore,
the total number of sub-states while k runs from 1 to n is
P
k=n+1
n
C k−1
= 2n sub-states. Let compute Bij by divided
k=1
into two subsets:
Compute Bij for i = j: This means that Bii is the sum
of the probability from state i − 1 bit “1” go to states has
k − 1 bit “1” then come back to state has i − 1 bit “1”. In
2n sub-states, we can divide back to n + 1 categories by the
number of different position between i and k.
• If all the bit in i and k are the same, then the probability
is:
!
!
C
n
n
(1 − α)2n
(1 − α)n (1 − α)n = C
0
0
• If all the bit in i and k different at only one position, then
the probability is:
!
n
(1 − α)2(n−1) (1 − α)2
C
1
• If all the bit in i and k different at only two positions,
then the probability is:
!
n
C
(1 − α)2(n−2) (1 − α)2×2
2
• If all the bit in i and k different at all positions, then the
probability is:
!
C
n
(1 − α)2n
n
Therefore, Bii can be determined by the probability of all
n + 1 categories such as:
!
n 2t
C
α (1−α)2n−2t = ((1 − α)2 − α2 )n = (1−2α)n
Bii =
t
t=0
t=n
X
A∗nkj
into two subsets:
Compute Bij for i6= j: Let divide
k + j is odd and A∗nkj < 0 or k + j is even and A∗nkj > 0,
Pk=n
respectively. Therefore, Bij = k=1 An ik A∗nkj also is distributed into positive or negative subsets. Next, we will show
that the positive subset in Bij is equal the negative subset then
Bij = 0 for i 6= j. Indeed, suppose that state i with i − 1 bit
“1” go to state k1 and then to back to state j with j −1 bit “1”
and Bik1 is positive value. Next, we will show that existence
a state k2 such that Bik2 is negative value and Bik1 = −Bik2 .
Let call s is the number of positions where state i and j
have a same bit. Obviously that s ≤ n − 1 due to i 6= j. For
example if n = 4 and i = 1111 and j = 0001, we have s = 1
because i and j share a same bit “1” in the positions fourth.
Suppose that an arbitrary state k1 are picked, we will show
how to chose the state k2 with Bik1 = −Bik2 . Consider two
follows cases:
• If (n − s) is odd. k2 is constructed by maintain s position
of k1 where i and j have same bit and flip bit in the n − s
rest positions.
• If (n − s) is even. k2 is constructed by maintain s + 1
position of k1 where s position are i and j have a same bit and
one position where i and j have a different bit, next n − s − 1
rest positions will be flipped. Note that since s ≤ n − 1 then
we are able to flip n − s − 1 rest positions.
We obviously can see that k1 and k2 satisfied the probability
condition |Bik1 | = |Bik2 | due to the number of flipped bit
between i and k1 equals the number of flipped bit between k2
and j and the number of flipped bit between j and k1 equals
the number of flipped bit between k2 and i.
Next, we will prove that k1 and k2 make Bik1 and Bik2 in
different subsets. Indeed, call number of bit “1” in k1 is b1 ,
number of bit “1” in k2 is b2 , number of bit “1” in s bit same
of i and j is bs , respectively. Therefore, the number of bit “1”
of k1 in (n − s) rest positions is (k1 − ks ), the number of bit
“1” of k2 in (n − s) rest positions is (k2 − ks ).
• If (n − s) is odd. Since all bit in (n − s) rest positions
of k1 is flipped to create k2 , then total number of bit “1” in
n − s bit of k1 and k2 is (k1 − ks + k2 − ks = n − s) is odd.
So, (k1 + k2 ) should be an odd number. That said (k1 − k2 )
is odd or (k1 + j) − (k2 + j) is odd. Therefore, Bik1 and Bik2
bring the contradict sign.
• If (n − s) is even. Because, we fix one more position to
create k2 , then number of flipped bit (n−s−1) is odd number.
If one more bit is fixed in k1 is “0”, we have a same result
with case (n − s) is odd. If fixed bit is “1”, similarly in first
case (k1 − ks − 1) + (k2 − ks − 1) = n − s − 1 is odd number,
therefore (k1 + k2) is odd number. That said (k1 − k2 ) is odd
or (k1 + j) − (k2 + j) is odd. Therefore, Bik1 and Bik2 bring
the contradict sign.
Therefore, the state k2 always can be created from a random
state k1 and Bik1 and Bik2 bring a contradict sign. That said
for i 6= j, Bij = 0. Therefore:
B = (1 − 2α)n I
The Proposition 2, therefore, are proven.
| 7cs.IT
|
AN INTRODUCTION TO PRESENTATIONS OF MONOID
ACTS: QUOTIENTS AND SUBACTS
arXiv:1709.08916v1 [math.GR] 26 Sep 2017
CRAIG MILLER AND NIK RUŠKUC
Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to introduce the theory of presentations
of monoids acts. We aim to construct ‘nice’ general presentations for various act
constructions pertaining to subacts and Rees quotients. More precisely, given
an M -act A and a subact B of A, on the one hand we construct presentations
for B and the Rees quotient A/B using a presentation for A, and on the other
hand we derive a presentation for A from presentations for B and A/B. We also
construct a general presentation for the union of two subacts. From our general
presentations, we deduce a number of finite presentability results. Finally, we
consider the case where a subact B has finite complement in an M -act A. We
show that if M is a finitely generated monoid and B is finitely presented, then A
is finitely presented. We also show that if M belongs to a wide class of monoids,
including all finitely presented monoids, then the converse also holds.
1. Introduction
The concept of presentations is significant within many areas of algebra. Finite
presentability of acts was first studied by P. Normak in 1977 [11], and is a fundamental finiteness condition for the theory of monoid acts (see [9]). The related
notion of coherency for monoids was introduced by V. Gould in 1992 [6], and has
since been intensively studied by several authors (see [7], [8]). Finite presentability
of acts also plays a key role in the monoid properties of being right Noetherian [11]
and being completely right pure [5]. However, there has not yet been developed a
systematic theory of presentations for acts over monoids. This paper is concerned
with introducing such a theory through considering presentations for two of the
most basic constructions: quotients and subacts. A follow-on article will deal with
various product constructions of acts.
The paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we collect some basic definitions and facts about acts. In Section 3, we introduce the notions of presentations
and finite presentability for a monoid act, provide various examples of act presentations, and record several results which will be of vital importance in the rest
of the paper. In the remainder of the paper, we study presentations for various
constructions. Typically we first obtain a general presentation for a construction
and then derive corollaries regarding finite presentability. Section 4 is concerned
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 20M30, 20M05.
1
with presentations of Rees quotients. Before moving to presentations of subacts in
general in Section 6, we first discuss presentations of unions of subacts in Section 5.
Section 6 splits into two parts; in the first part we construct a general presentation
for a subact, and in the second part we study a specific case where the subact has
finite complement.
2. Preliminaries
The theory of monoid acts is essentially the theory of representations of monoids
by transformations. A monoid is a semigroup with an identity. One of the most
common and universal ways of defining monoids is by means of presentations, and
we briefly review the basics here.
Let Z be an alphabet. We denote by Z ∗ the monoid of all words in Z. A monoid
presentation is a pair hZ | P iMon, where P ⊆ Z ∗ × Z ∗ .
A monoid M is said to be defined by the monoid presentation hZ | P iMon if
M∼
= Z ∗ /ρ, where ρ is the smallest congruence on Z ∗ containing P . Thus we can
identify M with Z ∗ /ρ, so that the elements of M are the ρ-classes of words from
Z ∗ . To put it differently, each word w ∈ Z ∗ represents an element of M.
Let u, v ∈ Z ∗ . We say that v is obtained from u by an application of a relation
from P if u = pqr and v = pq ′ r, where p, r ∈ Z ∗ and (q, q ′) ∈ P . We say that
u = v is a consequence of P if either u and v are identical words or if there exists
a sequence u = w1 , w2 , . . . , wk = v where each wi+1 is obtained from wi by an
application of a relation from R. We have the following basic fact:
Lemma 2.1. Let M be a monoid defined by a presentation hZ | P iMon, and let
u, v ∈ Z ∗ . Then u = v holds in M if and only u = v is a consequence of R.
Let M be a monoid with identity 1. An M-act is a non-empty set A together
with a map
A × M → A, (a, m) 7→ am
such that a(mn) = (am)n and a1 = a for all a ∈ A and m, n ∈ M. For instance,
M itself is an M-act via right multiplication.
A subset B of an M-act A is a subact of A if bm ∈ B for all b ∈ B, m ∈ M.
Note that the right ideals of M are precisely the subacts of the M-act M.
A subset U of an M-act A is a generating set for A if for any a ∈ A, there exist
u ∈ U, m ∈ M such that a = um. We write A = hUi if U is a generating set for A.
An M-act A is said to be finitely generated (resp. cyclic) if it has a finite (resp.
one-element) generating set.
Note that a right ideal of M can be generated by a set as an M-act or as a
semigroup. We introduce the convention that ‘generate’ will always mean ‘generate
as an M-act’.
For M-acts A and B, a map θ : A → B is an M-homomorphism if (am)θ =
(aθ)m for all a ∈ A, m ∈ M. If θ is also bijective, then it is an M-isomorphism,
and we write A ∼
= B.
2
An equivalence relation ρ on A is an (M-act) congruence on A if (a, b) ∈ ρ
implies (am, bm) ∈ ρ for all a, b ∈ A and m ∈ M. For a congruence ρ on an
M-act A, the quotient set A/ρ = {[a] : a ∈ A} becomes an M-act by defining
[a]m = [am].
Given an M-act A and a subact B of A, we define the Rees congruence ρB on
A by
aρB b ⇐⇒ a = b or a, b ∈ B
for all a, b ∈ A. We denote the quotient act A/ρB by A/B and call it the Rees
quotient of A by B. We usually identify the ρB -class {a} ∈ A/B with a for each
a ∈ A \ B, and denote the ρ-class B ∈ A/B by 0.
For an M-act A and X ⊆ A × A, we denote by hXicg the smallest congruence
on A containing X. A congruence ρ on an M-act A is finitely generated if there
exists a finite subset X ⊆ A × A such that ρ = hXicg .
Let A be an M-act and let X ⊆ A × A. We introduce the notation
X = X ∪ {(u, v) : (v, u) ∈ X},
which will be used throughout the paper. For a, b ∈ A, an X-sequence connecting
a and b is any sequence
a = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , q2 m2 = p3 m3 , . . . , qk mk = b,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ X and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k.
We now provide the following useful lemma (see [9, Section 1.4] for a proof):
Lemma 2.2. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act, let X ⊆ A × A and let
a, b ∈ A. Then (a, b) ∈ hXicg if and only if either a = b or there exists an
X-sequence connecting a and b.
A generating set U for an M-act A is a basis of A if for any a ∈ A, there exist
unique u ∈ U and m ∈ M such that a = um. An M-act A is said to be free if it
has a basis. We have the following structure theorem for free acts.
Proposition 2.3. [9, Theorem 1.5.13]. An M-act A is free if and only if it is
isomorphic to a disjoint union of M-acts all of which are M-isomorphic to M.
This leads to the following explicit construction of a free act.
Construction 2.4. Let M be a monoid. Let X be a non-empty set and consider
the set X × M. With the operation
(x, m)n = (x, mn)
for all (x, m) ∈ X × M and n ∈ M, the set X × M is a free M-act with basis X.
We denote this M-act by FX,M , although we will usually just write FX . We will
also usually write x · m for (x, m) and x for (x, 1).
3
Proposition 2.5. [9, Theorem 1.5.15]. Let A be an M-act and let F be a free
M-act with basis X. If φ is any map from X to A, then there exists a unique
M-homomorphism θ : F → A such that θ|X = φ. Further, if Xφ is a generating
set for A, then θ is surjective.
Corollary 2.6. For any M-act A, there exists a free M-act F such that A is a
homomorphic image of F .
3. Presentations of monoid acts
Let M be a monoid. An (M-act) presentation is a pair hX | Ri, where X is a
non-empty set and R ⊆ FX × FX is a relation on the free M-act FX . An element
x of X is called a generator, while an element (u, v) of R is called a (defining)
relation, and is usually written as u = v.
An M-act A is said to be defined by the presentation hX | Ri if A is M-isomorphic
to the quotient act FX /ρ, where ρ = hRicg is the smallest congruence on FX
containing R.
Let A be an M-act and θ : A → FX /ρ an M-isomorphism, where ρ = hRicg .
We say an element w ∈ FX represents an element a ∈ A if aθ = [w]ρ .
In the context of presentations, we write w1 ≡ w2 if w1 and w2 are equal in FX ,
and w1 = w2 if they represent the same element of A.
Remark 3.1. Let A be an M-act and let X be any generating set for A. By
Proposition 2.5, there exists a surjective M-homomorphism θ : FX → A, so we
have that A ∼
= FX /ker θ by the First Isomorphism Theorem. Therefore, A is
defined by the presentation hX | Ri where R is any relation which generates ker θ.
Hence, every M-act can be defined by a presentation.
Definition 3.2. Let hX | Ri be a presentation and let w1 , w2 ∈ FX . We say that
the relation w1 = w2 is a consequence of R if w1 ≡ w2 or there is an R-sequence
connecting w1 and w2 .
We say that w2 is obtained from w1 by an application of a relation from R if
there exists an R-sequence with only two distinct terms connecting w1 and w2 .
The next lemma follows immediately from Lemma 2.2.
Lemma 3.3. Let hX | Ri be a presentation, let A be the M-act defined by hX | Ri,
and let w1 , w2 ∈ FX . Then w1 = w2 in A if and only if w1 = w2 is a consequence
of R.
Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act generated by a set Y , and let φ : X → Y
be a surjective map. Let θ : FX → A be the unique M-homomorphism extending
φ, and let R be a subset of FX × FX . We say that A satisfies R (with respect to φ)
if for each (u, v) ∈ R, we have uθ = vθ; that is, R ⊆ ker θ. Note that the M-act
defined by a presentation hX | Ri satisfies R.
From the definition of an act defined by a presentation and Lemma 2.2, we have:
4
Proposition 3.4. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act generated by a set X,
and let R ⊆ FX × FX . Then hX | Ri is a presentation for A if and only if the
following conditions hold:
(1) A satisfies R;
(2) if w1 , w2 ∈ FX such that A satisfies w1 = w2 , then w1 = w2 is a consequence
of R.
The next fact follows from Proposition 2.5 and the Third Isomorphism Theorem
for acts.
Proposition 3.5. Let A be an M-act defined by a presentation hX | Ri, let B
be an M-act, and let φ : X → B be a map onto a generating set for B. If the
generators Xφ of B satisfy all the relations from R, then there exists a surjective
M-homomorphism ψ : A → B.
Definition 3.6. A finite presentation is a presentation hX | Ri where X and R are
finite. An M-act A is finitely presented if it can be defined by a finite presentation.
Note that a right ideal of a monoid M may be finitely presented as an M-act
or as a semigroup. When we say that a right ideal is ‘finitely presented’, we will
always mean as an M-act.
Example 3.7.
(1) The free M-act FX is defined by the finite presentation hX | i. In particular,
if X is finite, then FX is finitely presented.
(2) For any monoid M, the M-act M is finitely presented, since M is a free
M-act with basis {1}.
The following results are specialisations of well-known facts from general algebra.
They essentially reflect the fact that congruence-generation is an algebraic closure
operator. See, for instance, Section 1.5 and Theorem 2.5.5 in [3] for more details.
Proposition 3.8. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act defined by a finite
presentation hX | Ri, and let Y be another finite generating set for A. Then A can
be defined by a finite presentation in terms of the generators Y .
Proposition 3.9. Let M be a monoid, and let A be a finitely presented M-act
with a presentation hX | Si where X is finite and S is infinite. Then there exists
a finite subset S ′ ⊆ S such that A is defined by the finite presentation hX | S ′i.
Corollary 3.10. [11, Theorem 2]. Let M be a monoid and let A be a cyclic M-act.
Then A is finitely presented if and only if A is isomorphic to a quotient act of M
by a finitely generated right congruence on M.
Let M be a monoid with a generating set S and let A be an M-act with a
generating set X. It can be easily proved, using Proposition 3.4, that the following
are all presentations for A:
(1)
hA | a · m = am (a ∈ A, m ∈ M)i;
5
(2)
hX | x · m = y · n (x, y ∈ X, m, n ∈ M, xm = yn)i;
(3)
hA | a · s = as (a ∈ A, s ∈ S)i.
Given the presentation in (3), we immediately have the following:
Lemma 3.11. If M is a finitely generated monoid and A is a finite M-act, then
A is finitely presented.
If M is a non-finitely generated monoid, however, then finite M-acts are not
necessarily finitely presented, as the following example demonstrates.
Example 3.12. Let M = X ∗ be a free monoid with X infinite and consider the
trivial M-act A = {0}. Now A is defined by the presentation
h0 | 0 · x = 0 (x ∈ X)i.
If A were finitely presented, then it could be defined by a finite presentation
P = h0 | 0 · x = 0 (x ∈ X0 )i,
where X0 is a finite subset of X. But for x 6∈ X0 , the relation 0 · x = 0 is clearly
not a consequence of the relations of P , so A is not finitely presented.
Remark 3.13. One may be tempted to think that the trivial M-act being finitely
presented is equivalent to M being finitely generated. However, the trivial M-act
is in fact finitely presented for a much larger class of monoids M. For example, if
M is a monoid with a left zero z, it can be easily proved that the trivial M-act
{0} is defined by the finite presentation h0 | 0 = 0 · zi.
The following lemma provides a necessary and sufficient condition for the trivial
act to be finitely presented.
Lemma 3.14. Let M be a monoid. Then the trivial M-act {0} is finitely presented
if and only if there exists a finitely presented M-act A which contains a zero.
Proof. The direct implication is obvious. For the converse, let A be an M-act
with a zero 0, and suppose that A is defined by a finite presentation hX | Ri where
0 ∈ X. We define a finite set
R′ = {0 · m = 0 · n : (x · m, y · n) ∈ R for some x, y ∈ X},
and claim that {0} is defined by the presentation h0 | R′i. We need to show that
for any m ∈ M, the relation 0 · m = 0 is a consequence of R′ . Let m ∈ M. Since
0 · m = 0 holds in A, it is a consequence of R, so we have an R-sequence connecting
0 · m and 0. Now, replacing every x ∈ X appearing in this R-sequence with 0, we
obtain an R′ -sequence connecting 0 · m and 0, so 0 · m = 0 is a consequence of
R′ .
Tietze transformations (for acts) provide a method for yielding a new presentation for a monoid act from a known presentation. Given a presentation hX | Ri
for an M-act A, the elementary Tietze transformations are:
6
(T1) adding new relations ui = vi , i ∈ I, to hX | Ri, providing that each ui = vi
is a consequence of R;
(T2) deleting relations ui = vi , i ∈ I, from R, providing that each ui = vi is a
consequence of R \ {ui = vi : i ∈ I};
(T3) adding new generating elements yi , i ∈ I, and new relations yi = wi , i ∈ I,
to hX | Ri, for any wi ∈ FX ;
(T4) if hX | Ri has relations xi = wi , i ∈ I, where xi ∈ X and wi ∈ FX ′ where
X ′ = X \ {xi : i ∈ I}, then deleting each xi from X, deleting each xi = wi
from R, and replacing all remaining appearances of xi with wi .
Proposition 3.15. Two presentations define the same M-act if and only if one
can be obtained from the other by a finite number of applications of elementary
Tietze transformations.
Remark 3.16. The proof of Proposition 3.15 is essentially the same as the proof
for its analogue in group theory or semigroup theory. To see an idea of the proof,
one may consult [13, Theorem 2.5].
Corollary 3.17. Let M be a monoid, and let A be an M-act defined by a presentation hX | Si where X is finite and S is infinite. Then A is finitely presented if
and only if there exists a finite subset S ′ ⊆ S such that every relation from S is a
consequence of S ′ .
Proof. Suppose that A is finitely presented. By Proposition 3.9, there exists a finite
subset S ′ ⊆ S such that A is defined by a finite presentation hX | S ′ i. Therefore,
since every relation from S holds in A, it must be a consequence of S ′ .
Conversely, suppose that there exists a finite subset S ′ ⊆ S such that every
relation from S is a consequence of S ′ . Using Tietze transformations, we can
delete every relation from S \ S ′ . By Proposition 3.15, we have that A is defined
by the finite presentation hX | S ′i.
4. Rees quotients
Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act and let B be a subact of A. Recall that
the Rees quotient A/B is the quotient act resulting from the Rees congruence ρB
on A given by
aρB b ⇐⇒ a = b or a, b ∈ B
for all a, b ∈ A. We shall identify the ρB -class {a} ∈ A/B with a for each a ∈ A\B,
and denote the ρ-class B ∈ A/B by 0.
The purpose of this section is, on the one hand, to construct a presentation for
A/B using a presentation for A and a generating set for B, and on the other hand,
to derive a presentation for A using presentations for B and A/B. These general
presentations will give rise to corollaries pertaining to finite presentability.
Let X be any generating set for A. We now give a presentation for A/B in
terms of the generators (X \ B) ∪ {0}.
7
Theorem 4.1. Let M be a monoid. Let A be an M-act defined by a presentation
hX | Ri, let B be a subact of A generated by Y , and let h0 | Si be a presentation for
the trivial M-act {0}. For each y ∈ Y , choose wy ∈ FX such that y = wy holds in
A, and let R′ = R ∪ {y = wy : y ∈ Y }. We now define the sets
R1 = {(u, v) ∈ R : u represents an element of A \ B},
R2 = {u = 0 : u ∈ FX\B ∩ L(X, B), (u, v) ∈ R′ for some v ∈ FX∪Y },
where L(X, B) denotes the set of elements of FX which represent elements of B.
Then A/B is defined by the presentation hX \ B, 0 | R1, R2 , Si.
Proof. It is clear that A/B satisfies R1 , R2 and S. Let X ′ = X \ B, and let
w1 , w2 ∈ FX ′ ∪{0} such that w1 = w2 holds in A/B. By Proposition 3.4, we just
need to show that w1 = w2 is a consequence of R1 , R2 and S.
If w1 represents an element of A \ B, then w1 = w2 is a consequence of R1 .
Suppose w1 represents 0 in A/B. We claim that w1 = 0 is a consequence of
R1 ∪ R2 ∪ S. If w1 ∈ F0 , then w1 = 0 is a consequence of S. Now assume that
w1 ∈ FX ′ . By Proposition 3.15, we have that A is defined by the presentation
hX, Y | R′i. Choose w1′ ∈ FY such that w1 = w1′ holds in A. Then w1 = w1′ is a
consequence of R′ , so there exists an R′ -sequence
w1 = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , . . . , qk mk = w1′ ,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ R′ and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. Note that for i ∈ {1, . . . , k}, if
pi represents an element of A \ B, then pi+1 ∈ FX ′ . Therefore, since p1 ∈ FX ′
and pk represents an element of B (pk = qk in A and qk ∈ FY ), we may choose i
minimal such that pi ∈ FX ′ and pi represents an element of B. We then have that
w1 = pi mi is a consequence of R1 , and we obtain 0 · mi from pi mi by an application
of a relation from R2 . Now, since 0 · mi = 0 is a consequence of S, we deduce
that w1 = 0 is a consequence of R1 , R2 and S. This proves the claim. Exactly the
same argument proves that w2 = 0 is a consequence of R1 ∪ R2 ∪ S, and hence so
is w1 = 0 = w2 , as required.
Corollary 4.2. Let M be a monoid, let A be a finitely presented M-act and let B
be a finitely generated subact of A. Then A/B is finitely presented if and only if the
trivial M-act is finitely presented (which includes all finitely generated monoids).
Proof. If A/B is finitely presented, then it follows from Lemma 3.14 that the
trivial M-act is finitely presented, since A/B contains a zero. The converse follows
immediately from Theorem 4.1.
We now turn to our second aim in this section: assembling a presentation for A
from those for a subact and the Rees quotient. So, let M be a monoid, let A be
an M-act and let B be a subact of A. Let X be a generating set for B and let Y
be a generating set for A/B, and let Y ′ = Y \ {0}. Note that if A \ B is a subact
of A, the element 0 must belong to Y , and so Y = Y ′ ∪ {0}. If A \ B is not a
8
subact of A/B, then there exist elements w ∈ FY ′ that represent 0 in A/B, and
the set Y need not contain 0. We shall now give a presentation for A in terms of
the generators X ∪ Y ′ .
Theorem 4.3. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act and let B be a subact of
A. Let hX | Ri and hY | Si be presentations for B and A/B respectively, and let
Y ′ = Y \ {0}. If A \ B is not a subact of A/B, for each w ∈ FY ′ that represents
0 in A/B choose αw ∈ FX such that w = αw in A, and also fix one of them and
denote it by z. We now define the sets
S1 = {(u, v) ∈ S : u represents an element of A \ B};
S2 = {u = αu : (u, v) ∈ S for some v ∈ FY , u ∈ FY ′ , u = 0 in A/B} ∪ {z = αz }.
Then A is defined by the presentation hX, Y ′ | R, S1, S2 i.
Proof. We first claim that if an element w ∈ FY ′ represents an element of B in A,
then there exists w ′ ∈ FX such that w = w ′ is a consequence of relations from S1
and S2 . Indeed, we have that w = z holds in A/B, so w = z is a consequence of
S; that is, there exists an S-sequence
w = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , . . . , qk mk = z,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ S and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. If all (pi , qi ) ∈ S1 , then w = αz
is a consequence of S1 and z = αz . Otherwise, we take (pi , qi ) ∈ S \ S1 with i
minimal, so w = pi mi is a consequence of S1 , and we obtain αpi mi from pi mi by
an application of a relation from S2 .
We shall now show that A is defined by the presentation hX, Y ′ | R, S1 , S2 i.
It is clear that A satisfies R, S1 and S2 . Let w1 , w2 ∈ FX∪Y ′ be such that
w1 = w2 in A. If w1 represents an element of A \ B, then w1 = w2 is a consequence
of S1 . Now suppose that w1 represents an element of B. Using the above claim, if
necessary, we have w1′ , w2′ ∈ FX such that w1 = w1′ and w2 = w2′ are consequences
of S1 and S2 (if wi ∈ FX , simply let wi ≡ wi′ ). But then w1′ = w2′ holds in B, so
it is a consequence of R. Hence, we have that w1 = w2 is a consequence of R, S1
and S2 .
Corollary 4.4. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act and let B be a subact of
A. If B and A/B are finitely presented, then A is finitely presented.
5. Unions
In this section we consider presentations for unions of acts. A union of acts can
be of one of two types: disjoint or amalgamated. An amalgamated union of Macts is a union of a family of M-acts intersecting pairwise in a common subact.
We only consider the union of two acts, although the results of this section can
easily be generalised to any finite number of acts. Throughout the section we aim
to prove our results in the general setting where C = A ∪ B is an M-act with
9
A and B subacts, and A ∩ B is potentially non-empty. Each of those results will
typically have an immediate corollary for disjoint unions, which we state separately
immediately after.
The main purpose of the section is to explore under what conditions we have
C = A∪B is finitely generated (resp. finitely presented) if and only if A and B are
finitely generated (resp. finitely presented), and to provide interesting examples
to demonstrate that this does not occur in general. We begin by considering finite
generation.
Lemma 5.1. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C. If A and
B are finitely generated, then C is finitely generated.
Proof. If A = hXi and B = hY i, then C = hX ∪ Y i.
In the following example, we show that the converse to Lemma 5.1 does not
hold in general by constructing a finitely generated monoid M and right ideals A
and B of M such that C = A ∪ B is finitely generated (in fact, finitely presented)
but neither A nor B are finitely generated.
Example 5.2. Let M = {a, b}∗ . Let X = {ai b : i ≥ 0} and Y = {bi a : i ≥ 0},
and let A and B be the right ideals generated by X and Y respectively. It is clear
that A and B are not finitely generated. We have that C = A ∪ B is generated
by the set {a, b} and is free with respect to this generating set, so C is finitely
presented.
Lemma 5.3. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C, and suppose
that A ∩ B is either empty or finitely generated. If C is finitely generated, then A
and B are finitely generated.
Proof. If A ∩ B = ∅, let U = ∅; otherwise, let A ∩ B = hUi where U is finite.
Suppose that C = hZi. Let Y = Z \ B and let X = Y ∪ U. Let a ∈ A. If
a ∈ A \ B, then a = ym for some y ∈ Y and m ∈ M. If a ∈ A ∩ B, then a = um
for some u ∈ U and m ∈ M. Therefore, we have that A = hXi. Hence, if Z is
finite, A is finitely generated, and by symmetry so is B.
Corollary 5.4. Let A and B be disjoint M-acts. Then A ∪ B is finitely generated
if and only if A and B are finitely generated.
We now turn our attention to finite presentability. We begin by giving a general
presentation for C = A ∪ B, and we then immediately derive a corollary that gives
a sufficient condition for C to be finitely presented.
Theorem 5.5. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C. Let
A and B have presentations hX | Ri and hY | Si respectively. If A ∩ B 6= ∅, let
U be a generating set for A ∩ B; otherwise, let U = ∅. For each u ∈ U, choose
ρX (u) ∈ FX and ρY (u) ∈ FY which both represent u in C, and define a set
T = {ρX (u) = ρY (u) : u ∈ U}.
10
Then C is defined by the presentation hX, Y | R, S, T i.
Proof. Let w1 , w2 ∈ FX∪Y such that w1 = w2 in C.
If w1 , w2 ∈ FX , then w1 = w2 is a consequence of R. If w1 , w2 ∈ FY , then
w1 = w2 is a consequence of S.
Suppose now that w1 ∈ FX and w2 ∈ FY . Let c = um, with u ∈ U and m ∈ M,
be the element of A ∩ B that both w1 and w2 represent. Since w1 = ρX (u)m
holds in A, it is a consequence of R, and likewise w2 = ρY (u)m is a consequence
of S. We also obtain ρY (u)m from ρX (u)m by an application of a relation from
T . Therefore, we have that w1 = w2 is a consequence of R, S and T .
Corollary 5.6. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C, and
suppose that A ∩ B is either empty or finitely generated. If A and B are finitely
presented, then C is finitely presented.
The converse to Corollary 5.6 does not hold in general. Recall that in Example
5.2 we showed that there exists a monoid M and M-acts A and B such that
C = A ∪ B is finitely presented but neither A nor B are finitely generated. We
now present a more striking example:
Example 5.7. There exist a monoid M and finitely generated right ideals A and
B of M such that A ∩ B is finitely generated and C = A ∪ B is finitely presented
but neither A nor B are finitely presented.
Let M be the monoid defined by the presentation
ha, b, s, t | abi a = aba, bai b = bab, sa = a, tb = b (i ≥ 2)iMon .
We have a complete rewriting system RM on X = {a, b, s, t} consisting of the rules
abi a → aba, bai b → bab, sa → a, tb → b (i ≥ 2),
and this yields the following set of normal forms for M:
X ∗ \ X ∗ ({abi a, bai b : i ≥ 2} ∪ {sa, tb})X ∗ ;
that is, the set of all words in X which do not contain as a subword the left-hand
side of one of the rewriting rules. For more information on rewriting systems, one
may consult [2] for instance.
Let A and B be the right ideals of M generated by {a, t} and {b, s} respectively.
From the monoid presentation for M, we see that A is defined by the infinite
presentation
ha, t | a · bi a = a · ba (i ≥ 2)i.
If A were finitely presented, then it could be defined by a presentation
P = ha, t | a · bi a = a · ba (2 ≤ i ≤ k)i.
But if i > k, then the relation a · bi a = a · ba cannot be a consequence of the
relations of P , since there do not exist m, n ∈ M such that bi a = mn in M and
(a · m, a · ba) ∈ P ; in other words, no relation of P can be applied to a · bi a.
11
Therefore, A is not finitely presented. Similarly, we have that B is not finitely
presented. We also that A ∩ B = ha, bi. It is clear from the monoid presentation
for M that C = A ∪ B is generated by the set {s, t} and is free with respect to
this generating set, so hence C is finitely presented.
We now turn to consider conditions for when C = A ∪ B being finitely presented
implies that the components A and B are both finitely presented.
Theorem 5.8. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C, and
suppose that A ∩ B is either empty or finitely presented. If C is finitely presented,
then both A and B are finitely presented.
Proof. It clearly suffices to show that A is finitely presented. If A ∩ B = ∅, let
U = ∅; otherwise, let A ∩ B be defined by a finite presentation hU | Si. Suppose
C is defined by a finite presentation hZ | Ri. Let Y = Z \ B and X = Y ∪ U. As
in the proof of Lemma 5.3, we have that A = hXi. Also, let Y ′ = Z ∩ B.
For each w ∈ FZ such that w represents an element of A∩B, choose ρU (w) ∈ FU
which represents the same element of A ∩ B. Also, for each u ∈ U, choose wu ∈ FZ
such that wu represents u. We now define the following sets:
R1 = {(u, v) ∈ R : u, v ∈ FY };
R2 = {u = wu : u ∈ U, wu ∈ FY };
R3 = {u = ρU (u) : u ∈ FY , (u, v) ∈ R for some v ∈ FY ′ }.
Note that the set R2 may be empty (if wu ∈ FY ′ for every u ∈ U); however, this
does not affect the argument that follows. We make the following claim:
Claim. If an element w ∈ FY represents an element of A ∩ B, then there exists
w ′ ∈ FU such that w = w ′ is a consequence of relations from R1 , R2 and R3 .
Proof. Let w ∈ FY represent an element c ∈ A ∩ B. Now c = um for some u ∈ U
and m ∈ M. Since w = wu m holds in C, it is a consequence of R, so there exists
an R-sequence
w = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , . . . , qk mk = wu m,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ R and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. If each (pi , qi ) ∈ R1 , then
w = wu m is a consequence of R1 , and we obtain u · m from wu m by an application
of a relation from R2 . Otherwise, there exists i minimal such that pi ∈ FY and
qi ∈ FY ′ , so w = pi mi is a consequence of R1 , and we obtain ρU (pi )mi from pi mi
by an application of a relation from R3 .
Returning to the proof of Theorem 5.8, we shall show that A is defined by the
finite presentation hX | R1 , R2 , R3 , Si.
Let w1 , w2 ∈ FX such that w1 = w2 holds in A. If w1 represents an element of
A \ B, then w1 = w2 is a consequence of R1 . Suppose w1 represents an element
of A ∩ B. Using the claim above, if necessary, we have w1′ , w2′ ∈ FU such that
w1 = w1′ and w2 = w2′ are consequences of R1 , R2 and R3 (if wi ∈ FU , simply let
12
wi ≡ wi′ ). Since w1′ = w2′ holds in A ∩ B, we have that w1′ = w2′ is a consequence
of S. Therefore, w1 = w2 is a consequence of R1 , R2 , R3 and S.
Corollary 5.9. Let A and B be disjoint M-acts. Then A ∪ B is finitely presented
if and only if A and B are finitely presented.
We now investigate how finite presentability of C = A∪B affects the intersection
A ∩ B.
Proposition 5.10. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B subacts of C,
and suppose that A ∩ B is non-empty. If C is finitely presented and A and B are
finitely generated, then A ∩ B is finitely generated.
Proof. Let A and B be generated by finite sets X and Y respectively. Since C is
finitely presented, it can be defined by a finite presentation hX, Y | Ri.
For any w ∈ FX , let w denote the element of A which w represents, and define
U = {u : u ∈ FX , (u, v) ∈ R for some v ∈ FY } ⊆ A ∩ B.
Let c ∈ A ∩ B. Choose w1 ∈ FX and w2 ∈ FY which both represent the element c.
Since w1 = w2 holds in C, it is a consequence of R, so there exists an R-sequence
w1 = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , . . . , qk mk = w2 ,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ R and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. Now, there exists i ∈ {1, . . . , k}
such that pi ∈ FX and qi ∈ FY , and we have that c = pi mi , so c ∈ hUi. Hence, we
have that A ∩ B = hUi, so A ∩ B is finitely generated.
Corollary 5.11. Let C = A ∪ B be an M-act with A and B finitely presented
subacts of C and A ∩ B non-empty. Then C is finitely presented if and only if
A ∩ B is finitely generated.
Remark 5.12. In the categorical sense, the disjoint union of acts is a coproduct
and the amalgamated union of acts is a pushout. In the category of groups, the
coproduct is called the free product and the pushout is called the free product with
amalgamation. Notice the similarity between Corollary 5.11 and a well-known
result, due to G. Baumslag, which states that for two finitely presented groups
G1 and G2 such that H = G1 ∩ G2 is a group, the amalgamated free product
G = G1 ∗H G2 is finitely presented if and only if H is finitely generated; see [1,
Chapter 6] for more details.
Given the results concerning finite presentability in this section, the following
two questions arise: Do there exist monoids M and M-acts A, B and C with
C = A ∪ B, such that:
(1) A and B are finitely presented but C is not finitely presented?
(2) A and B are finitely presented, while A ∩ B is finitely generated but not
finitely presented?
13
In the following, we exhibit examples which provide positive answers to both of
the above two questions.
Example 5.13. There exists a monoid M and finitely presented right ideals A
and B of M such that C = A ∪ B is not finitely presented.
Let M be the monoid defined by the presentation
ha, b, c | aci a = bci−1 b (i ≥ 2)iMon .
We have a complete rewriting system RM on X = {a, b, s, t} consisting of the rules
aci a → bci−1 b (i ≥ 2),
and this yields the following set of normal forms for M:
X ∗ \ (X ∗ {aci a : i ≥ 2}X ∗ ).
Let A and B be the right ideals of M generated by {a} and {b} respectively. We
have that A and B are free M-acts and hence finitely presented. Let X = {aci a :
i ≥ 2}. It is clear from the monoid presentation for M that X generates A∩B, and
that this is a minimal generating set for A ∩ B, so A ∩ B is not finitely generated.
It now follows from Corollary 5.11 that C = A ∪ B is not finitely presented.
Example 5.14. There exists a monoid M and finitely presented right ideals A
and B of M such that A ∩ B is finitely generated but not finitely presented.
Let M be the monoid defined by the presentation
ha, b, c | a2 = a, cab = ab, abi a = aba (i ≥ 2)iMon.
We have a complete rewriting system RM on X = {a, b, c} consisting of the rules
a2 → a, cab → ab, abi a → aba (i ≥ 2),
and this yields the following set of normal forms for M:
X ∗ \ X ∗ ({abi a : i ≥ 2} ∪ {a2 , cab})X ∗ .
Let A and B be the right ideals of M generated by {a} and {c} respectively. From
the monoid presentation for M, we see that B is a free M-act (and hence finitely
presented), that A is defined by the infinite presentation
ha | a · a = a, a · bi a = a · ba (i ≥ 2)i,
and that A ∩ B is defined by the infinite presentation hy | y · bi a = y · a (i ∈ N)i,
where y represents ab. We claim that A is also defined by the finite presentation
ha | a · a = ai. Indeed, for any i ≥ 2, we have
a · bi a = (a · a)bi a ≡ a · abi a ≡ a · aba ≡ (a · a)ba ≡ a · ba.
It can be shown that A ∩ B is not finitely presented using a similar argument to
the one in Example 5.7.
14
Note that since A and B are finitely presented and A ∩ B is finitely generated,
Corollary 5.11 implies that C = A ∪ B is finitely presented. In fact, it is easy to
see that C is defined by the finite presentation
ha, c | a · a = a, a · b = c · abi.
6. Subacts
In this section we consider presentations for subacts of monoid acts. In the first
part of the section we construct a general (infinite) presentation for a subact of a
monoid act. From this presentation we obtain a method for finding ‘nicer’ presentations in special situations. We note that for general monoids M, finitely generated
subacts of finitely presented M-acts are not necessarily finitely presented.
In the second part of the section, we shall consider a particular case where
we have a subact B with finite complement in an M-act A; we say that B is
large in A and A is a small extension of B. This was motivated by the analogous
concept of ‘large subsemigroups’ within semigroup theory; see [12] for more details.
In particular, it is shown there that various finiteness properties, including finite
generation and finite presentability, are inherited by both large subsemigroups and
small extensions of semigroups. Given these results, it is natural to ask whether
similar results hold in the setting of monoid acts. We shall show that, for finitely
generated monoids M, finite generation is inherited by both large subacts and
small extensions, and finite presentability is also inherited by small extensions.
Somewhat surprisingly, though, there exist finitely generated monoids M for which
large subacts of finitely presented M-acts are not necessarily finitely presented.
We shall show, however, that there is a large class of monoids for which finite
presentability is inherited by large subacts.
Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act defined by a presentation hX | Ri, and
let B be a subact of A generated by a set Y . We seek a presentation for B in
terms of the generators Y .
For each y ∈ Y , we choose wy ∈ FX which represents y, and let ψ : FY → FX
be the unique M-homomorphism extending y 7→ wy . We call ψ the representation
map. For an element w ∈ FX which represents an element of B, we have w = x · m
for some x ∈ X and m ∈ M, and xm = yn for some y ∈ Y, n ∈ M, so w = (yψ)n
holds in B. Therefore, we have a map φ : L(X, B) → FY , where L(X, B) denotes
the set of all elements of FX which represent elements of B, satisfying (wφ)ψ = w
in A for all w ∈ L(X, B). We call φ a rewriting map. Note that the existence of φ
follows from the Axiom of Choice.
We now state our first result of this section, giving a presentation for B, which
has analogues within group and semigroup theory; see [10, Theorem 2.6] and [4,
Theorem 2.1] for more details.
15
Theorem 6.1. Let M be a monoid. Let A be an M-act defined by a presentation
hX | Ri and let B be a subact of A generated by Y . For each y ∈ Y , we choose
wy ∈ FX which represents y. Let ψ be the representation map and let φ be a
rewriting map, and define the following sets of relations:
R1 = {y = wy φ : y ∈ Y };
R2 = {(wm)φ = (wφ)m : w ∈ L(X, B), m ∈ M};
R3 = {(um)φ = (vm)φ : (u, v) ∈ R, m ∈ M, um ∈ L(X, B)}.
Then B is defined by the presentation hY | R1 , R2 , R3 i.
Proof. We first show that B satisfies R1 , R2 and R3 . This amounts to showing
that uψ = vψ holds in A for each u = v in R1 , R2 and R3 .
For each y ∈ Y , we have yψ ≡ wy = (wy φ)ψ holds in A, since wy ∈ L(X, B).
For any w ∈ L(X, B) and m ∈ M, we have
((wm)φ)ψ = wm = ((wφ)ψ)m ≡ ((wφ)m)ψ
holds in A. Finally, for any (u, v) ∈ R, m ∈ M such that um ∈ L(X, B), we have
((um)φ)ψ = um = vm = ((vm)φ)ψ
holds in A.
We now claim that for any w ∈ FY , we have that w = (wψ)φ is a consequence of
R1 and R2 . Indeed, we have w ≡ y · m for some y ∈ Y and m ∈ M, so wψ ≡ wy m.
We obtain (wy φ)m from w by an application of the relation y = wy φ, and since
wy ∈ L(X, B), we have that (wψ)φ = (wy φ)m is a relation from R2 .
Now let w1 , w2 ∈ FY be such that w1 = w2 holds in B. Since w1 ψ = w2 ψ holds
in A, it is a consequence of R, so we have an R-sequence
w1 ψ = p1 m1 , q1 m1 = p2 m2 , . . . , qk mk = w2 ,
where (pi , qi ) ∈ R and mi ∈ M for 1 ≤ i ≤ k. For each i ∈ {1, . . . , k}, we
have pi mi ∈ L(X, B), so (w1 ψ)φ = (w2 ψ)φ is a consequence of the relations
(pi mi )φ = (qi mi )φ of R3 . Finally, since w1 = (w1 ψ)φ and (w2 ψ)φ = w2 are
consequences of R1 and R2 , we conclude that w1 = w2 is a consequence of R1 , R2
and R3 .
Remark 6.2. The presentation from Theorem 6.1 has the disadvantage that it
always has infinitely many relations if M is an infinite monoid, and neither the
rewriting map nor the set L(X, B) have been defined constructively. However, the
result does give a method for finding ‘nice’ presentations for subacts in certain
cases. Given an M-act A defined by a presentation hX | Ri and a subact B of A,
this method consists of the following:
(1) finding a generating set Y for B;
(2) finding a rewriting map φ : L(X, B) → FY ;
(3) finding a set S ⊆ FY × FY of relations which hold in B and imply the
relations of the presentation P given in Theorem 6.1.
16
Using Tietze transformations, we can add S to P (S must be a consequence of
the relations of P since these are defining relations for B) and then remove the
remaining relations (since they are consequences of S). Hence, by Proposition
3.15, we have that B is defined by the presentation hY | Si.
For the remainder of this section we shall be considering large subacts. Recall
that a subact B of an M-act is said to be large in A, and A is said to be a small
extension of B, if the set A \ B is finite. We shall investigate how similar an Mact A and a large subact B of A are with regard to finite generation and finitely
presentability. We begin by considering finite generation.
Lemma 6.3. Let M be a monoid, let A be an M-act and let B be a large subact
of A. If B is finitely generated, then A is finitely generated.
Proof. If B is generated by a set X, then A is generated by X ∪ (A \ B).
In the following, we show that the converse to Lemma 6.3 does not hold for
monoids in general, but it does however hold for all groups and all finitely generated
monoids.
Example 6.4. Let M = X ∗ with X infinite. Let I = X + , so I is a large subact
of the cyclic M-act M. Clearly X is a minimal generating set for I, so I is not
finitely generated.
Lemma 6.5. Let M be a group, let A be an M-act and let B be a large subact of
A. If A is finitely generated, then B is finitely generated.
Proof. Since A is the disjoint union of its subacts B and A \ B, it follows from
Corollary 5.4 that B is finitely generated if A is finitely generated.
The following result provides a generating set for a large subact.
Proposition 6.6. Let M be a monoid generated by a set Z, let A be an M-act
generated by a set X, and let B be a large subact of A. Define a set
S = {am ∈ B : a ∈ A \ B, m ∈ Z},
and let Y = (X ∩ B) ∪ S. Then B is generated by the set Y .
Proof. Since Y ⊆ B and B is a subact of A, we have hY i ⊆ B. Let b ∈ B. If
b = xm for some x ∈ X ∩ B, m ∈ M, then b ∈ hY i. Otherwise, b = xm1 . . . mk
for some x ∈ X \ B, mi ∈ Z. Let s be minimal such that xm1 . . . ms ∈ B, and let
a = xm1 . . . ms−1 . Then a ∈ A \ B and ams ∈ B, so ams ∈ S. Therefore, we have
b = (ams )ms+1 . . . mk ∈ hSi ⊆ hY i.
Hence, we have that B = hY i.
Corollary 6.7. Let M be a finitely generated monoid, let A be an M-act and let
B be a large subact of A. If A is finitely generated, then B is finitely generated.
17
We have shown that, for groups and finitely generated monoids M, finite generation is inherited by both large subacts and small extensions. We now turn our
attention to finite presentability. For a monoid M, there are two questions relating
to large subacts that arise:
(1) Is every small extension of every finitely presented M-act finitely presented?
(2) Is every large subact of every finitely presented M-act finitely presented?
We first show that the property every small extension of every finitely presented
M-act is finitely presented, is equivalent to another monoid property, and from
this we immediately derive as a corollary that finitely generated monoids M admit
a positive answer to question (1).
Proposition 6.8. The following are equivalent for a monoid M:
(1) every finite M-act is finitely presented;
(2) every small extension of every finitely presented M-act is finitely presented.
Proof. (1) ⇒ (2). Let A be a small extension of a finitely presented M-act B. We
have that A/B is finite and hence finitely presented by assumption. Since B and
A/B are finitely presented, it follows that A is finitely presented by Corollary 4.4.
(2) ⇒ (1). Let A be a finite M-act. Choose a finitely presented M-act B disjoint
from A. We have that A ∪ B is a small extension of B, so it is finitely presented
by assumption. Hence, by Corollary 5.9, we have that A is finitely presented.
Corollary 6.9. Let M be a finitely generated monoid. Then every small extension
of every finitely presented M-act is finitely presented.
We now turn to consider which monoids M give a positive answer to question (2); that is, every large subact of every finitely presented M-act is finitely
presented. We first present an example which reveals that there exist finitely generated monoids which do not possess this property, and then we show that there
exists a large class of monoids for which the property holds.
Example 6.10. Let M be the monoid defined by the presentation
ha, b | abi a = aba (i ≥ 2)iMon .
Let I = M \ {1, a}, so I is a large subact of the finitely presented M-act M.
Now I = hb, a2 , abi is a disjoint union of hbi, ha2 i and habi. Clearly hbi and ha2 i
are free and hence finitely presented. Letting y = ab, we have that hyi is defined
by the presentation
hy | y · bi a = y · a (i ∈ N)i.
We saw in Example 5.14 that hyi is not finitely presented. It hence follows from
Corollary 5.9 that I is not finitely presented.
Lemma 6.11. Let M be a group, let A be an M-act and let B be a large subact
of A. If A is finitely presented, then B is finitely presented.
18
Proof. Since A is the disjoint union of its subacts B and A \ B, it follows from
Corollary 5.9 that B is finitely presented if A is finitely presented.
Definition 6.12. A monoid M is right coherent if every finitely generated subact
of every finitely presented M-act is finitely presented.
Examples of right coherent monoids include groups, Clifford monoids, semilattices, the bicyclic monoid, free commutative monoids and free monoids [8].
Since for any finitely generated monoid M, a large subact of a finitely generated
M-act is finitely generated, we have the following result:
Lemma 6.13. Let M be a finitely generated right coherent monoid, let A be an
M-act and let B be a large subact of A. If A is finitely presented, then B is finitely
presented.
Before stating our final result of this section, we first introduce a technical
definition.
Let M be a monoid with a presentation hZ | P iMon, and let A be an M-act with
a presentation hX | Ri. For a word w in Z ∗ , let w denote the element of M which
w represents. We say an element x · w ∈ FX,Z ∗ represents an element a ∈ A if
x · w ∈ FX,M represents a ∈ A.
Theorem 6.14. Let M be a finitely presented monoid, let A be an M-act and let
B be a large subact of A. If A is finitely presented, then B is finitely presented.
Proof. We shall prove this result using the method based on Theorem 6.1 and
outlined in Remark 6.2.
Let M be defined by the presentation hZ | P iMon, where Z and P are finite.
Suppose A is defined by the finite presentation hX | Ri. We define the finite set
S = {am ∈ B : a ∈ A \ B, m ∈ Z},
and let Y = (X ∩ B) ∪ S. We have that B = hY i by Proposition 6.6.
Let W denote the set of elements of FX,Z ∗ which represent elements of B. We
define a map
θ : W → FY,M
as follows. For u ∈ W , we have u = x · w for some x ∈ X and w ∈ Z ∗ . If x ∈ B,
let uθ = x · w. Suppose x ∈ A \ B. Now w = m1 . . . mk where mi ∈ Z. Let
s be minimal such that x · m1 . . . ms represents an element of B, say b, and let
uθ = b · ms+1 . . . mk .
Let L(X, B) denote the set of elements of FX,M which represent elements of B.
For each m ∈ M, choose an element wm ∈ Z ∗ which represents m. We now have
a well-defined rewriting map
φ : L(X, B) → FY , x · m 7→ (x · wm )θ.
19
Note that for any x ∈ X ∩ B, we have x ≡ xφ. Now, for each y ∈ S, we have
y = ay my for some ay ∈ A \ B and my ∈ Z. Choose uy ∈ FX which represents ay
in A, so (uy my )φ = y holds in B.
We now define the following sets of relations:
S1 = {uφ = vφ : (u, v) ∈ R, u ∈ L(X, B)};
S2 = {b · w = c · z : b, c ∈ S, w and z are suffixes of p and q respectively
for some (p, q) ∈ P, b · w = c · z holds in B}.
Since R, S and P are finite, we have that S1 and S2 are finite.
We now make the following claim:
Claim. Let x ∈ X and w, w ′ ∈ Z ∗ such that w = w ′ holds in M and x·w represents
an element of B. Then (x · w)θ = (x · w ′)θ is a consequence of S2 .
Proof. If x ∈ B, then
(x · w)θ ≡ x · w ≡ x · w ′ ≡ (x · w ′ )θ.
Suppose now that x ∈ A \ B. Since w = w ′ is a consequence of P , it is clearly
sufficient to consider the case where w ′ is obtained from w by a single application
of a relation from P , so let w = pqr and w ′ = pq ′ r where p, r ∈ Z ∗ and (q, q ′) ∈ P .
There are three cases.
Case 1: x · p represents an element of B. Since q = q ′ in M, we have
(x · w)θ ≡ ((x · p)θ)qr ≡ ((x · p)θ)q ′ r ≡ (x · w ′ )θ.
Case 2: x · pq represents an element of A \ B. Now r = m1 . . . mk where mi ∈ Z.
Let s be minimal such that x · pqm1 . . . ms represents an element of B, say b. Since
x · pq and x · pq ′ represent the same element of A, we have
(x · w)θ ≡ b · ms+1 . . . mk ≡ (x · w ′ )θ.
Case 3: x · p represents an element of A \ B and x · pq represents an element of
B. Now q = m1 . . . mk and q ′ = n1 . . . nl where mi , ni ∈ Z. Let s be minimal such
that x · pm1 . . . ms represents an element of B, say b, and let t be minimal such
that x · pn1 . . . nt represents an element of B, say c. We have that
(x · w)θ ≡ (b · ms+1 . . . mk )r = (c · nt+1 . . . nl )r ≡ (x · w ′ )θ,
using an application of a relation from S2 .
Returning to the proof of Theorem 6.14, we shall show that B is defined by the
finite presentation hY | S1 , S2 i. We need to show that the relations R1 , R2 and
R3 of the presentation for B given in Theorem 6.1 are consequences of S1 and S2 .
That is, we show that for any y ∈ S, w ∈ L(X, B) and m ∈ M, and (u, v) ∈ R,
n ∈ M such that un ∈ L(X, B), the relations y = (uy my )φ, (wm)φ = (wφ)m and
(un)φ = (vn)φ are consequences of S1 and S2 .
20
Let y ∈ S. We have that uy = x · m for some x ∈ X \ B and m ∈ M. Since
wm my = wmmy holds in M, we have that
y ≡ (x · wm my )θ = (x · wmmy )θ ≡ (uy my )φ
is a consequence of S2 by the above claim.
Now let u = x · n ∈ L(X, B) and m ∈ M. We have that (um)φ ≡ (x · wnm )θ
and (uφ)m ≡ (x · wn wm )θ. Since wnm = wn wm holds in M, we have that (um)φ =
(uφ)m is a consequence of S2 by the above claim.
Finally, let (u, v) ∈ R and n ∈ M such that un ∈ L(X, B). Suppose first that
u ∈ L(X, B). We have that (un)φ = (uφ)n and (vn)φ = (vφ)n are consequences
of S2 , and we obtain (vφ)n from (uφ)n by an application of a relation from S1 .
Therefore, (un)φ = (vn)φ is a consequence of S1 and S2 .
Suppose now that u represents an element of A \ B. We have that u = x · m
and v = x′ · m′ for some x, x′ ∈ X and m, m′ ∈ M. Now (un)φ = (x · wm wn )θ
and (vn)φ = (x′ · wm′ wn )θ are consequences of S2 by the above claim. We have
that wn = m1 . . . mk where mi ∈ Z. Let s be minimal such that x · wm m1 . . . ms
represents an element of B, say b. Since x · wm and x′ · wm′ represent the same
element of A, we have
(x · wm wn )θ ≡ b · ms+1 . . . mk ≡ (x′ · wm′ wn )θ.
Therefore, we have that (un)φ = (vn)φ is a consequence of S2 .
References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
G. Baumslag. Topics in Combinatorial Group Theory. Birkhauser, 1993.
R. Book and F. Otto. String rewriting systems. Springer-Verlag, 1993.
S. Burris and H. Sankappanavar. A Course in Universal Algebra. Springer-Verlag, 1981.
C. Campbell, E. Robertson, N. Ruskuc and R. Thomas. Reidermeister-Schreier type rewriting for semigroups. Semigroup Forum, 51:47-62, 1995.
V. Gould. Completely right pure monoids. Proc. Royal Irish Acad., 87A:73-82, 1987.
V. Gould. Coherent monoids. J. Australian Math. Soc., 53:166-182, 1992.
V. Gould, M. Hartmann and N. Ruskuc. Free monoids are coherent. Proc. Edinburgh Math.
Soc., 60:127-131, 2017.
V. Gould and M. Hartmann. Coherency, free inverse monoids and related free algebras.
Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., to appear.
M. Kilp, U. Knauer and A. Mikhalev. Monoids, Acts and Categories. Walter de Gruyter,
2000.
W. Magnus, A. Karrass and D. Solitar. Combinatorial Group Theory: Presentations of
Groups in Terms of Generators and Relations. Courier Corporation, 2004.
P. Normak. On Noetherian and finitely presented acts (in Russian). Tartu Ul. Toimetised,
431:37-46, 1977.
N. Ruskuc. On large subsemigroups and finiteness conditions of semigroups. Proc. London
Math. Soc., 76:383-405, 1998.
N. Ruskuc. Semigroup Presentations. PhD Thesis, University of St Andrews, 1995.
21
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews,
Scotland, UK
E-mail address: {cm30,nik.ruskuc}@st-andrews.ac.uk
22
| 4math.GR
|
On the Behaviours Produced by Instruction
Sequences under Execution
arXiv:1106.6196v2 [cs.PL] 11 Jun 2012
J.A. Bergstra and C.A. Middelburg
Informatics Institute, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam,
Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands
[email protected],[email protected]
Abstract. We study several aspects of the behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution in the setting of the algebraic theory of processes known as ACP. We use ACP to describe the behaviours
produced by instruction sequences under execution and to describe two
protocols implementing these behaviours in the case where the processing of instructions takes place remotely. We also show that all finite-state
behaviours considered in ACP can be produced by instruction sequences
under execution.
Keywords: instruction sequence, remote instruction processing, instruction sequence producible process
1
Introduction
The concept of an instruction sequence is a very primitive concept in computing.
It has always played a central role in computing because of the fact that execution of instruction sequences underlies virtually all past and current generations
of computers. It happens that, given a precise definition of an appropriate notion of an instruction sequence, many issues in computer science can be clearly
explained in terms of instruction sequences. A simple yet interesting example
is that a program can simply be defined as a text that denotes an instruction
sequence. Such a definition corresponds to an empirical perspective found among
practitioners.
In theoretical computer science, the meaning of programs usually plays a
prominent part in the explanation of many issues concerning programs. Moreover, what is taken for the meaning of programs is mathematical by nature.
On the other hand, it is customary that practitioners do not fall back on the
mathematical meaning of programs in case explanation of issues concerning programs is needed. They phrase their explanations from an empirical perspective.
An empirical perspective that we consider appealing is the perspective that a
program is in essence an instruction sequence and an instruction sequence under
execution produces a behaviour that is controlled by its execution environment
in the sense that each step performed actuates the processing of an instruction by
the execution environment and a reply returned at completion of the processing
determines how the behaviour proceeds.
This paper concerns the behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution as such and two issues relating to the behaviours produced by
instruction sequences under execution, namely the issue of implementing these
behaviours in the case where the processing of instructions takes place remotely
and the issue of the extent to which the behaviours considered in process algebra
can be produced by instruction sequences under execution.
Remote instruction processing means that a stream of instructions to be processed arises at one place and the processing of that stream of instructions is
handled at another place. This phenomenon is increasingly encountered. It is
found if loading the instruction sequence to be executed as a whole is impracticable. For instance, the storage capacity of the execution unit is too small or
the execution unit is too far away. Remote instruction processing requires special attention because the transmission time of the messages involved in remote
instruction processing makes it hard to keep the execution unit busy without
intermission.
In the literature on computer architecture, hardly anything can be found
that contributes to a sound understanding of the phenomenon of remote instruction processing. As a first step towards such an understanding, we give rigorous
descriptions of two protocols for remote instruction processing at a level of abstraction that captures the underlying essence of the protocols. One protocol is
very simple, but makes no effort keep the execution unit busy without intermission. The other protocol is more complex and is directed towards keeping
the execution unit busy without intermission. It is reminiscent of an instruction
pre-fetching mechanism as found in pipelined processors (see e.g. [26]), but its
range of application is not restricted to pipelined instruction processing.
The work presented in this paper belongs to a line of research which started
with an attempt to approach the semantics of programming languages from the
perspective mentioned above. The first published paper on this approach is [7].
That paper is superseded by [8] with regard to the groundwork for the approach:
program algebra, an algebraic theory of single-pass instruction sequences, and
basic thread algebra, an algebraic theory of mathematical objects that represent
in a direct way the behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution.1 The main advantages of the approach are that it does not require a lot
of mathematical background and that it is more appealing to practitioners than
the main approaches to programming language semantics: the operational approach, the denotational approach and the axiomatic approach. For an overview
of these approaches, see e.g. [32].
The work presented in this paper is based on the instruction sequences considered in program algebra and the representation of the behaviours produced
by instruction sequences under execution considered in basic thread algebra. It
is rather awkward to describe and analyse the behaviours of this kind using al1
In [8], basic thread algebra is introduced under the name basic polarized process
algebra.
2
gebraic theories of processes such as ACP [3,6], CCS [27,31] and CSP [23,29].
However, the objects considered in basic thread algebra can be viewed as representations of processes as considered in process algebra. This allows for the
protocols for remote instruction processing to be described using ACP or rather
ACPτ , an extension of ACP which supports abstraction from internal actions.
Process algebra is an area of the study of concurrency which is considered relevant to computer science, as is witnesses by the extent of the work on algebraic
theories of processes such as ACP, CCS and CSP in theoretical computer science. This strongly hints that there are programmed systems whose behaviours
can be taken for processes as considered in process algebra. Therefore, it is interesting to know to which extent the behaviours considered in process algebra
can be produced by programs under execution, starting from the perception of a
program as an instruction sequence. In this paper, we will show that, by apposite
choice of instructions, all finite-state processes can be produced by instruction
sequences (provided that the cluster fair abstraction rule, see e.g. Section 5.6 of
[24], is valid).
The instruction sequences considered in program algebra are single-pass instruction sequences, i.e. finite or infinite sequences of instructions of which each
instruction is executed at most once and can be dropped after it has been executed or jumped over. Program algebra does not provide a notation for programs
that is intended for actual programming: programs written in an assembly language are finite instruction sequences for which single-pass execution is usually
not possible. We will also show that all finite-state processes can as well be
produced by programs written in a program notation which is close to existing
assembly languages.
Instruction sequences under execution may make use of services provided by
their execution environment such as counters, stacks and Turing tapes. The use
operators added to basic thread algebra in e.g. [12] can be used to describe the
behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution that make use of
services. Interesting is that instruction sequences under execution that make use
of services may produce infinite-state processes. On that account, we will make
precise what processes are produced by instruction sequences under execution
that make use of services provided by their execution environment.
As a continuation of the work on a new approach to programming language semantics mentioned above, the notion of an instruction sequence was
subjected to systematic and precise analysis using the groundwork laid earlier.
This led among other things to expressiveness results about the instruction sequences considered and variations of the instruction sequences considered (see
e.g. [12,18,20,21,36]). Instruction sequences are under discussion for many years
in diverse work on computer architecture, as witnessed by e.g. [4,22,25,30,33,34,35,39,41],
but the notion of an instruction sequence has never been subjected to any precise analysis before. As another continuation of the work on a new approach
to programming language semantics mentioned above, selected issues relating to
well-known subjects from the theory of computation and the area of computer architecture were rigorously investigated thinking in terms of instruction sequences
3
(see e.g. [14,15,16,17,19]). The subjects from the theory of computation, namely
the halting problem and non-uniform computational complexity, are usually investigated thinking in terms of a common model of computation such as Turing
machines and Boolean circuits (see e.g. [1,28,38]). The subjects from the area of
computer architecture, namely instruction sequence performance, instruction set
architectures and remote instruction processing, are usually not investigated in a
rigorous way at all. The general aim of the work in both continuations mentioned
is to bring instruction sequences as a theme in computer science better into the
picture. The work presented in this paper forms a part of the last mentioned
continuation.
This paper is organized as follows. The body of the paper consists of three
parts. The first part (Sections 2–7) concerns the behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution as such and includes surveys of program algebra,
basic thread algebra and the algebraic theory of processes known as ACP. The
second part (Sections 8–10) concerns the issue of implementing these behaviours
in the case where the processing of instructions takes place remotely and includes rigorous descriptions of two protocols for remote instruction processing.
The third part (Sections 11–14) concerns the issue of the extent to which the behaviours considered in process algebra can be produced by instruction sequences
under execution and includes the result that, by apposite choice of instructions,
all finite-state processes can be produced by instruction sequences.
This paper consolidates material from [11,13,14].
2
Program Algebra
In this section, we review PGA (ProGram Algebra). The starting-point of program algebra is the perception of a program as a single-pass instruction sequence.
The concepts underlying the primitives of program algebra are common in programming, but the particular form of the primitives is not common. The predominant concern in the design of program algebra has been to achieve simple
syntax and semantics, while maintaining the expressive power of arbitrary finite
control.
In PGA, it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A of basic instructions
has been given. The intuition is that the execution of a basic instruction may
modify a state and produces a reply at its completion. The possible replies are
the Boolean values T and F.
PGA has the following primitive instructions:
–
–
–
–
–
for each a ∈ A, a plain basic instruction a;
for each a ∈ A, a positive test instruction +a;
for each a ∈ A, a negative test instruction −a;
for each l ∈ N, a forward jump instruction #l;
a termination instruction !.
We write I for the set of all primitive instructions of PGA. On execution of an
instruction sequence, these primitive instructions have the following effects:
4
– the effect of a positive test instruction +a is that basic instruction a is
executed and execution proceeds with the next primitive instruction if T
is produced and otherwise the next primitive instruction is skipped and
execution proceeds with the primitive instruction following the skipped one
— if there is no primitive instructions to proceed with, inaction occurs;
– the effect of a negative test instruction −a is the same as the effect of +a,
but with the role of the value produced reversed;
– the effect of a plain basic instruction a is the same as the effect of +a, but
execution always proceeds as if T is produced;
– the effect of a forward jump instruction #l is that execution proceeds with
the l-th next instruction of the program concerned — if l equals 0 or there
is no primitive instructions to proceed with, inaction occurs;
– the effect of the termination instruction ! is that execution terminates.
PGA has the following constants and operators:
– for each u ∈ I, an instruction constant u ;
– the binary concatenation operator ; ;
– the unary repetition operator ω .
We assume that there is a countably infinite set of variables which includes
x, y, z. Terms are built as usual. We use infix notation for concatenation and
postfix notation for repetition.
A closed PGA term is considered to denote a non-empty, finite or eventually
periodic infinite sequence of primitive instructions.2 The instruction sequence
denoted by a closed term of the form t ; t′ is the instruction sequence denoted
by t concatenated with the instruction sequence denoted by t′ . The instruction
sequence denoted by a closed term of the form tω is the instruction sequence denoted by t concatenated infinitely many times with itself. Some simple examples
of closed PGA terms are
a;b;c,
a ; (b ; c)ω .
+a ; #2 ; #3 ; b ; ! ,
On execution of the instruction sequence denoted by the first term, the basic
instructions a, b and c are executed in that order and after that inaction occurs.
On execution of the instruction sequence denoted by the second term, the basic
instruction a is executed first, if the execution of a produces the reply T, the
basic instruction b is executed next and after that execution terminates, and
if the execution of a produces the reply F, inaction occurs. On execution of
the instruction sequence denoted by the third term, the basic instruction a is
executed first, and after that the basic instructions b and c are executed in that
order repeatedly forever.
Closed PGA terms are considered equal if they represent the same instruction
sequence. The axioms for instruction sequence equivalence are given in Table 1.
In this table, n stands for an arbitrary positive natural number. The term tn ,
2
An eventually periodic infinite sequence is an infinite sequence with only finitely
many distinct suffixes.
5
Table 1. Axioms of PGA
(x ; y) ; z = x ; (y ; z)
(xn )ω = xω
xω ; y = xω
(x ; y)ω = x ; (y ; x)ω
PGA1
PGA2
PGA3
PGA4
where t is a PGA term, is defined by induction on n as follows: t1 = t and
tn+1 = t ; tn . The unfolding equation xω = x ; xω is derived as follows:
xω = (x ; x)ω
by PGA2
= x ; (x ; x)ω by PGA4
= x ; xω
by PGA2 .
Each closed PGA term is derivably equal to a term in canonical form, i.e. a
ω
term of the form t or t ; t′ , where t and t′ are closed PGA terms in which the
repetition operator does not occur. For example:
(a ; b)ω ; c ; ! = a ; (b ; a)ω ,
+a ; (#4 ; b ; (−c ; #5 ; !)ω )ω = +a ; #4 ; b ; (−c ; #5 ; !)ω .
The initial models of PGA are considered its standard models. Henceforth,
we restrict ourselves to the initial model I PGA of PGA in which:
– the domain is the set of all non-empty, finite and eventually periodic infinite
sequences over the set I of primitive instructions;
– the operation associated with ; is concatenation;
– the operation associated with ω is the operation ω defined as follows:
• if F is a finite sequence over I, then F ω is the unique eventually periodic
infinite sequence F ′ such that F concatenated n times with itself is a
proper prefix of F ′ for each n ∈ N;
• if F is an eventually periodic infinite sequence over I, then F ω is F .
In the sequel, we use the term instruction sequence for the elements of the
domain of I PGA , and we denote the interpretations of the constants and operators of PGA in I PGA by the constants and operators themselves. I PGA is loosely
called the initial model of PGA because all initial models of PGA are isomorphic,
i.e. there exist bijective homomorphism between them (see e.g. [37,40]).
3
Basic Thread Algebra
In this section, we review BTA (Basic Thread Algebra). BTA is an algebraic
theory of mathematical objects that represent in a direct way the behaviours
produced by instruction sequences under execution. The objects concerned are
called threads.
In BTA, it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A of basic actions, with
tau ∈
/ A, has been given. Besides, tau is a special basic action. We write Atau for
6
Table 2. Axiom of BTA
x E tau D y = x E tau D x T1
A ∪ {tau}. A thread performs basic actions in a sequential fashion. Upon each
basic action performed, a reply from an execution environment determines how
it proceeds. The possible replies are the Boolean values T and F. Performing tau,
which is considered performing an internal action, always leads to the reply T.
Although BTA is one-sorted, we make this sort explicit. The reason for this
is that we will extend BTA with an additional sort in Section 13.
BTA has one sort: the sort T of threads. To build terms of sort T, it has the
following constants and operators:
– the inaction constant D : T;
– the termination constant S : T;
– for each a ∈ Atau , the binary postconditional composition operator E a D :
T × T → T.
We assume that there are infinitely many variables of sort T, including x, y, z.
Terms of sort T are built as usual. We use infix notation for the postconditional
composition operators. We introduce basic action prefixing as an abbreviation:
a ◦ t, where a ∈ Atau and t is a term of sort T, abbreviates t E a D t.
The thread denoted by a closed term of the form t E a D t′ will first perform
a, and then proceed as the thread denoted by t if the reply from the execution
environment is T and proceed as the thread denoted by t′ if the reply from
the execution environment is F. The threads denoted by D and S will become
inactive and terminate, respectively. Some simple examples of closed BTA terms
are
a ◦ (S E b D D) ,
(b ◦ S) E a D D .
The first term denotes the thread that first performs basic action a, next performs basic action b, if the reply from the execution environment on performing
b is T, after that terminates, and if the reply from the execution environment
on performing b is F, after that becomes inactive. The second term denotes the
thread that first performs basic action a, if the reply from the execution environment on performing a is T, next performs the basic action b and after that
terminates, and if the reply from the execution environment on performing a is
F, next becomes inactive.
BTA has only one axiom. This axiom is given in Table 2. Using the abbreviation introduced above, axiom T1 can be written as follows: x E tau D y = tau ◦ x.
Notice that each closed BTA term denotes a thread that will become inactive
or terminate after it has performed finitely many actions. Infinite threads can
be described by guarded recursion.
A guarded recursive specification over BTA is a set of recursion equations
E = {X = tX | X ∈ V }, where V is a set of variables of sort T and each tX is a
BTA term of the form D, S or t E a D t′ with t and t′ that contain only variables
7
Table 3. RDP, RSP and AIP
hX|Ei = htX |Ei if X = tX ∈ E RDP
E ⇒ X = hX|Ei if X ∈ V(E)
RSP
V
n≥0
πn (x) = πn (y) ⇒ x = y
π0 (x) = D
πn+1 (S) = S
πn+1 (D) = D
πn+1 (x E a D y) = πn (x) E a D πn (y)
AIP
P0
P1
P2
P3
from V . We write V(E) for the set of all variables that occur in E. We are
only interested in models of BTA in which guarded recursive specifications have
unique solutions, such as the projective limit model of BTA presented in [5].
A simple example of a guarded recursive specification is the one consisting
of following two equations:
x = x EaD y ,
y = y EbD S .
The x-component of the solution of this guarded recursive specification is the
thread that first performs basic action a repeatedly until the reply from the execution environment on performing a is F, next performs basic action b repeatedly
until the reply from the execution environment on performing b is F, and after
that terminates.
For each guarded recursive specification E and each X ∈ V(E), we introduce a constant hX|Ei of sort T standing for the X-component of the unique
solution of E. We write htX |Ei for tX with, for all Y ∈ V(E), all occurrences
of Y in tX replaced by hY |Ei. The axioms for the constants for the components
of the solutions of guarded recursive specifications are RDP (Recursive Definition Principle) and RSP (Recursive Specification Principle), which are given in
Table 3. RDP and RSP are actually axiom schemas in which X stands for an
arbitrary variable, tX stands for an arbitrary BTA term, and E stands for an
arbitrary guarded recursive specification over BTA. Side conditions are added to
restrict what X, tX and E stand for. The equations hX|Ei = htX |Ei for a fixed
E express that the constants hX|Ei make up a solution of E. The conditional
equations E ⇒ X = hX|Ei express that this solution is the only one.
RDP and RSP are means to prove closed terms that denote the same infinite
thread equal. We introduce AIP (Approximation Induction Principle) as an additional means to prove closed terms that denote the same infinite thread equal.
AIP is based on the view that two threads are identical if their approximations
up to any finite depth are identical. The approximation up to depth n of a thread
is obtained by cutting it off after it has performed n actions. AIP is also given
in Table 3. Here, approximation up to depth n is phrased in terms of the unary
projection operator πn : T → T. The axioms for the projection operators are
axioms P0–P3 in Table 3. P1–P3 are actually axiom schemas in which a stands
for arbitrary basic action and n stands for an arbitrary natural number.
We write BTA+REC for BTA extended with the constants for the components of the solutions of guarded recursive specifications, the projection operators
and the axioms RDP, RSP, AIP and P0–P3.
8
The minimal models of BTA+REC are considered its standard models.3 Recall that a model of an algebraic theory is minimal iff all elements of the domains
associated with the sorts of the theory can be denoted by closed terms. Henceforth, we restrict ourselves to the minimal models of BTA+REC. We assume
that a minimal model MBTA+REC of BTA+REC has been given.
In the sequel, we use the term thread for the elements of the domain of
MBTA+REC , and we denote the interpretations of constants and operators in
MBTA+REC by the constants and operators themselves.
Let T be a thread. Then the set of states or residual threads of T , written
Res(T ), is inductively defined as follows:
– T ∈ Res(T );
– if T ′ E a D T ′′ ∈ Res(T ), then T ′ ∈ Res(T ) and T ′′ ∈ Res(T ).
Let T be a thread and let A′ ⊆ Atau . Then T is regular over A′ if the following
conditions are satisfied:
– Res(T ) is finite;
– for all T ′ , T ′′ ∈ Res(T ) and a ∈ Atau , T ′ E a D T ′′ ∈ Res(T ) implies a ∈ A′ .
We say that T is regular if T is regular over Atau .
For example, the x-component of the solution of the guarded recursive specification consisting of the following two equations:
x=a◦y ,
y = (c ◦ y) E b D (x E d D S)
has five states and is regular over any A′ ⊆ Atau for which {a, b, c, d} ⊆ A′ .
We will make use of the fact that being a regular thread coincides with being
a component of the solution of a finite guarded recursive specification in which
the right-hand sides of the recursion equations are of a restricted form.
A linear recursive specification over BTA is a guarded recursive specification
E = {X = tX | X ∈ V } over BTA, where each tX is a term of the form D, S or
Y E a D Z with Y, Z ∈ V .
Proposition 1. Let T be a thread and let A′ ⊆ Atau . Then T is regular over A′
iff there exists a finite linear recursive specification E over BTA in which only
basic actions from A′ occur such that T is a component of the solution of E.
Proof. The implication from left to right is proved as follows. Because T is
regular, Res(T ) is finite. Hence, there are finitely many threads T1 , . . . , Tn , with
T = T1 , such that Res(T ) = {T1 , . . . , Tn }. Now T is the x1 -component of the
solution of the linear recursive specification consisting of the following equations:
if Ti = S
S
xi = D
for all i ∈ [1, n] .
if Ti = D
xj E a D xk if Ti = Tj E a D Tk
3
A minimal model of an algebraic theory is a model of which no proper subalgebra
is a model as well.
9
Table 4. Defining equations for thread extraction operation
|a| = a ◦ D
|a ; F | = a ◦ |F |
|+a| = a ◦ D
|+a ; F | = |F | E a D |#2 ; F |
|−a| = a ◦ D
|−a ; F | = |#2 ; F | E a D |F |
|#l| = D
|#0 ; F | = D
|#1 ; F | = |F |
|#l + 2 ; u| = D
|#l + 2 ; u ; F | = |#l + 1 ; F |
|!| = S
|! ; F | = S
Because T is regular over A′ , only basic actions from A′ occur in the linear
recursive specification constructed in this way.
The implication from right to left is proved as follows. Thread T is a component of the unique solution of a finite linear specification in which only basic
actions from A′ occur. This means that there are finitely many threads T1 , . . . ,
Tn , with T = T1 , such that for every i ∈ [1, n], Ti = S, Ti = D or Ti = Tj E a D Tk
for some j, k ∈ [1, n] and a ∈ A′ . Consequently, T ′ ∈ Res(T ) iff T ′ = Ti for some
i ∈ [1, n] and moreover T ′ E a D T ′′ ∈ Res(T ) only if a ∈ A′ . Hence, Res(T ) is
finite and T is regular over A′ .
⊓
⊔
Remark 1. A structural operational semantics of BTA+REC and a bisimulation
equivalence based on it can be found in e.g. [10]. The quotient algebra of the
algebra of closed terms of BTA+REC by this bisimulation equivalence is one of
the minimal models of BTA+REC.
4
Thread Extraction
In this short section, we use BTA+REC to make mathematically precise which
threads are produced by instruction sequences under execution.
For that purpose, A is taken such that A ⊇ A is satisfied.
The thread extraction operation | | assigns a thread to each instruction sequence. The thread extraction operation is defined by the equations given in
Table 4 (for a ∈ A, l ∈ N, and u ∈ I) and the rule that |#l ; F | = D if #l is the
beginning of an infinite jump chain. This rule is formalized in e.g. [12].
Let F be an instruction sequence and T be a thread. Then we say that F
produces T if |F | = T . For example,
a;b;c
+a ; #2 ; #3 ; b ; !
+a ; −b ; c ; !
+a ; #2 ; (b ; #2 ; c ; #2)ω
produces
produces
produces
produces
a◦b◦c◦D,
(b ◦ S) E a D D ,
(S E b D (c ◦ S)) E a D (c ◦ S) ,
D E a D (b ◦ D) .
In the case of instruction sequences that are not finite, the produced threads can
be described as components of the solution of a guarded recursive specification.
For example, the infinite instruction sequence
(a ; +b)ω
10
produces the x-component of the solution of the guarded recursive specification
consisting of following two equations:
x=a◦y ,
y = x EbD y
and the infinite instruction sequence
a ; (+b ; #2 ; #3 ; c ; #4 ; −d ; ! ; a)ω
produces the x-component of the solution of the guarded recursive specification
consisting of following two equations:
x=a◦y ,
5
y = (c ◦ y) E b D (x E d D S) .
Algebra of Communicating Processes
In this section, we review ACPτ (Algebra of Communicating Processes with abstraction). This algebraic theory of processes will among other things be used
to make precise what processes are produced by the threads denoted by closed
terms of BTA+REC. For a comprehensive overview of ACPτ , the reader is referred to [3,24].
In ACPτ , it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A of atomic actions,
with τ, δ ∈
/ A, and a fixed but arbitrary commutative and associative function
| : A ∪ {τ } × A ∪ {τ } → A ∪ {δ}, with τ | e = δ for all e ∈ A ∪ {τ }, have been given.
The function | is regarded to give the result of synchronously performing any two
atomic actions for which this is possible, and to give δ otherwise. In ACPτ , τ is a
special atomic action, called the silent step. The act of performing the silent step
is considered unobservable. Because it would otherwise be observable, the silent
step is considered an atomic action that cannot be performed synchronously
with other atomic actions. We write Aτ for A ∪ {τ }.
ACPτ has the following constants and operators:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
for each e ∈ A, the atomic action constant e ;
the silent step constant τ ;
the inaction constant δ ;
the binary alternative composition operator + ;
the binary sequential composition operator · ;
the binary parallel composition operator k ;
the binary left merge operator ⌊⌊ ;
the binary communication merge operator | ;
for each H ⊆ A, the unary encapsulation operator ∂H ;
for each I ⊆ A, the unary abstraction operator τI .
We assume that there are infinitely many variables, including x, y, z. Terms are
built as usual. We use infix notation for the binary operators. The precedence
conventions used with respect to the operators of ACPτ are as follows: + binds
weaker than all others, · binds stronger than all others, and the remaining operators bind equally strong.
Let t and t′ be closed ACPτ terms, e ∈ A, and H, I ⊆ A. Intuitively, the
constants and operators to build ACPτ terms can be explained as follows:
11
– the process denoted by e first performs atomic action e and next terminates
successfully;
– the process denoted by τ performs an unobservable atomic action and next
terminates successfully;
– the process denoted by δ can neither perform an atomic action nor terminate
successfully;
– the process denoted by t + t′ behaves either as the process denoted by t or
as the process denoted by t′ , but not both;
– the process denoted by t · t′ first behaves as the process denoted by t and on
successful termination of that process it next behaves as the process denoted
by t′ ;
– the process denoted by t k t′ behaves as the process that proceeds with the
processes denoted by t and t′ in parallel;
– the process denoted by t ⌊⌊ t′ behaves the same as the process denoted by
t k t′ , except that it starts with performing an atomic action of the process
denoted by t;
– the process denoted by t | t′ behaves the same as the process denoted by t k t′ ,
except that it starts with performing an atomic action of the process denoted
by t and an atomic action of the process denoted by t′ synchronously;
– the process denoted by ∂H (t) behaves the same as the process denoted by t,
except that atomic actions from H are blocked;
– the process denoted by τI (t) behaves the same as the process denoted by
t, except that atomic actions from I are turned into unobservable atomic
actions.
The operators ⌊⌊ and | are of an auxiliary nature. They are needed to axiomatize
ACPτ .
The axioms of ACPτ are given in Table 5. CM2–CM3, CM5–CM7, C1–C4,
D1–D4 and TI1–TI4 are actually axiom schemas in which a, b and c stand for
arbitrary constants of ACPτ , and H and I stand for arbitrary subsets of A.
ACPτ is extended with guarded recursion like BTA.
A recursive specification over ACPτ is a set of recursion equations E =
{X = tX | X ∈ V }, where V is a set of variables and each tX is an ACPτ term
containing only variables from V . We write V(E) for the set of all variables that
occur in E. Let t be an ACPτ term without occurrences of abstraction operators
containing a variable X. Then an occurrence of X in t is guarded if t has a
subterm of the form e · t′ where e ∈ A and t′ is a term containing this occurrence
of X. Let E be a recursive specification over ACPτ . Then E is a guarded recursive
specification if, in each equation X = tX ∈ E: (i) abstraction operators do not
occur in tX and (ii) all occurrences of variables in tX are guarded or tX can be
rewritten to such a term using the axioms of ACPτ in either direction and/or
the equations in E except the equation X = tX from left to right. We are only
interested models of ACPτ in which guarded recursive specifications have unique
solutions, such as the models of ACPτ presented in [3].
For each guarded recursive specification E and each X ∈ V(E), we introduce
a constant hX|Ei standing for the X-component of the unique solution of E. We
12
Table 5. Axioms of ACPτ
x·τ =x
B1
x · (τ · (y + z) + y) = x · (y + z) B2
x+y = y+x
(x + y) + z = x + (y + z)
x+x = x
(x + y) · z = x · z + y · z
(x · y) · z = x · (y · z)
x+δ = x
δ·x=δ
A1
A2
A3
A4
A5
A6
A7
x k y = x ⌊⌊ y + y ⌊⌊ x + x | y
a ⌊⌊ x = a · x
a · x ⌊⌊ y = a · (x k y)
(x + y) ⌊⌊ z = x ⌊⌊ z + y ⌊⌊ z
a · x | b = (a | b) · x
a | b · x = (a | b) · x
a · x | b · y = (a | b) · (x k y)
(x + y) | z = x | z + y | z
x | (y + z) = x | y + x | z
CM1
CM2
CM3
CM4
CM5
CM6
CM7
CM8
CM9
∂H (a) = a
if a ∈
/H
∂H (a) = δ
if a ∈ H
∂H (x + y) = ∂H (x) + ∂H (y)
∂H (x · y) = ∂H (x) · ∂H (y)
D1
D2
D3
D4
τI (a) = a
if a ∈
/I
τI (a) = τ
if a ∈ I
τI (x + y) = τI (x) + τI (y)
τI (x · y) = τI (x) · τI (y)
TI1
TI2
TI3
TI4
a|b=b|a
(a | b) | c = a | (b | c)
δ|a=δ
τ |a=δ
C1
C2
C3
C4
Table 6. RDP, RSP and AIP
hX|Ei = htX |Ei if X = tX ∈ E RDP
E ⇒ X = hX|Ei if X ∈ V(E)
RSP
V
n≥0
πn (x) = πn (y) ⇒ x = y
AIP
π0 (a) = δ
πn+1 (a) = a
π0 (a · x) = δ
πn+1 (a · x) = a · πn (x)
πn (x + y) = πn (x) + πn (y)
πn (τ ) = τ
πn (τ · x) = τ · πn (x)
PR1
PR2
PR3
PR4
PR5
PR6
PR7
write htX |Ei for tX with, for all Y ∈ V(E), all occurrences of Y in tX replaced
by hY |Ei. The axioms for the constants for the components of the solutions of
guarded recursive specifications are RDP and RSP, which are given in Table 6.
RDP and RSP are actually axiom schemas in which X stands for an arbitrary
variable, tX stands for an arbitrary ACPτ term, and E stands for an arbitrary
guarded recursive specification over ACPτ . Side conditions are added to restrict
what X, tX and E stand for.
Closed terms of ACPτ extended with constants for the components of the
solutions of guarded recursive specifications that denote the same process cannot
always be proved equal by means of the axioms of ACPτ together with RDP
and RSP. We introduce AIP to remedy this. AIP is based on the view that two
processes are identical if their approximations up to any finite depth are identical.
The approximation up to depth n of a process behaves the same as that process,
except that it cannot perform any further atomic action after n atomic actions
have been performed. AIP is given in Table 6. Here, approximation up to depth
13
n is phrased in terms of a unary projection operator πn . The axioms for the
projection operators are axioms PR1–PR7 in Table 6. PR1–PR7 are actually
axiom schemas in which a stands for arbitrary constants of ACPτ different from
τ and n stands for an arbitrary natural number.
We write ACPτ +REC for ACPτ extended with the constants for the components of the solutions of guarded recursive specifications, the projection operators, and the axioms RDP, RSP, AIP and PR1–PR7.
The minimal models of ACPτ +REC are considered its standard models.
Henceforth, we restrict ourselves to the minimal models of ACPτ +REC. We
assume that a fixed but arbitrary minimal model MACPτ +REC of ACPτ +REC
has been given.
From Section 12, we will sometimes assume that CFAR (Cluster Fair Abstraction Rule) is valid in MACPτ +REC . CFAR says that a cluster of silent steps
that has exits can be eliminated if all exits are reachable from everywhere in the
cluster. A precise formulation of CFAR can be found in [24].
We use the term process for the elements from the domain of MACPτ +REC ,
and we denote the interpretations of constants and operators in MACPτ +REC
by the constants and operators themselves.
Let P be a process. Then the set of states or subprocesses of P , written
Sub(P ), is inductively defined as follows:
– P ∈ Sub(P );
– if e · P ′ ∈ Sub(P ), then P ′ ∈ Sub(P );
– if e · P ′ + P ′′ ∈ Sub(P ), then P ′ ∈ Sub(P ).
Let P be a process and let A′ ⊆ Aτ . Then P is regular over A′ if the following
conditions are satisfied:
– Sub(P ) is finite;
– for all P ′ ∈ Sub(P ) and e ∈ Aτ , e · P ′ ∈ Sub(P ) implies e ∈ A′ ;
– for all P ′ , P ′′ ∈ Sub(P ) and e ∈ Aτ , e · P ′ + P ′′ ∈ Sub(P ) implies e ∈ A′ .
We say that P is regular if P is regular over Aτ .
We will make use of the fact that being a regular process over A coincides with
being a component of the solution of a finite guarded recursive specification in
which the right-hand sides of the recursion equations are linear terms. Linearity
of terms is inductively defined as follows:
–
–
–
–
δ is linear;
if e ∈ Aτ , then e is linear;
if e ∈ Aτ and X is a variable, then e · X is linear;
if t and t′ are linear, then t + t′ is linear.
A linear recursive specification over ACPτ is a guarded recursive specification
E = {X = tX | X ∈ V } over ACPτ , where each tX is linear.
Proposition 2. Let P be a process and let A′ ⊆ A. Then P is regular over A′
iff there exists a finite linear recursive specification E over ACPτ in which only
atomic actions from A′ occur such that P is a component of the solution of E.
14
Proof. The proof follows the same line as the proof of Proposition 1.
⊓
⊔
Remark 2. Proposition 2 is concerned with processes that are regular over A. We
can also prove that being a regular process over Aτ coincides with being a component of the solution of a finite linear recursive specification over ACPτ if we assume that the cluster fair abstraction rule [24] holds in the model MACPτ +REC .
However, we do not need this more general result.
P
, in } and ti1 , . . . , tin are ACPτ
We will write
i∈S ti , where S = {i1 , . . .P
terms, for ti1 + . . . + tin . The convention is that i∈S ti stands for δ if S = ∅. We
will often write X for hX|Ei if E is clear from the context. It should be borne
in mind that, in such cases, we use X as a constant.
6
Program-Service Interaction Instructions
Recall that, in PGA, it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A of basic
instructions has been given. In the sequel, we will make use a version of PGA in
which the following additional assumptions relating to A are made:
– a fixed but arbitrary finite set F of foci has been given;
– a fixed but arbitrary finite set M of methods has been given;
– A = {f.m | f ∈ F , m ∈ M}.
Each focus plays the role of a name of some service provided by an execution
environment that can be requested to process a command. Each method plays
the role of a command proper. Executing a basic instruction of the form f.m is
taken as making a request to the service named f to process command m.
A basic instruction of the form f.m is called a program-service interaction
instruction. Recall that, in BTA, it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A
of basic actions has been given. In the sequel, we will make use of a version of
BTA in which A = A. A basic action of the form f.m is called a thread-service
interaction action.
The intuition concerning program-service interaction instructions given above
will be made fully precise in Section 7, using ACP.
7
Process Extraction
In this section, we use ACPτ +REC to make mathematically precise which processes are produced by threads.
For that purpose, A and | are taken such that the following conditions are
satisfied:4
A ⊇ {sf (d) | f ∈ F , d ∈ M ∪ B} ∪ {rf (d) | f ∈ F , d ∈ M ∪ B} ∪ {stop, i}
4
As usual, we will write B for the set {T, F}.
15
Table 7. Defining equations for process extraction operation
|S|c = stop
|D|c = δ
|T E tau D T ′ |c = i · i · |T |c
|T E f.m D T ′ |c = sf (m) · (rf (T) · |T |c + rf (F) · |T ′ |c )
and for all f ∈ F , d ∈ M ∪ B, and e ∈ A:
sf (d) | rf (d) = i ,
sf (d) | e = δ
if e 6= rf (d) ,
e | rf (d) = δ
if e 6= sf (d) ,
stop | e = δ
i|e= δ .
if e 6= stop ,
Actions of the forms sf (d) and rf (d) are send and receive actions, respectively,
stop is an explicit termination action, and i is a concrete internal action.
The process extraction operation | | assigns a process to each thread. The
process extraction operation | | is defined by |T | = τ{stop} (|T |c ), where | |c is
defined by the equations given in Table 7 (for f ∈ F and m ∈ M).
Let P be a process, T be a thread, and F be an instruction sequence. Then
we say that T produces P if τ · τI (|T |) = τ · P for some I ⊆ A, and we say that
F produces P if |F | produces P .
Notice that two atomic actions are involved in performing a basic action of
the form f.m: one for sending a request to process command m to the service
named f and another for receiving a reply from that service upon completion
of the processing. Notice also that, for each thread T , |T |c is a process that
in the event of termination performs a special termination action just before
termination. Abstraction from this termination action yields the process denoted
by |T |.
The process extraction operation preserves the axioms of BTA+REC. Before
we make this fully precise, we have a closer look at the axioms of BTA+REC.
A proper axiom is an equation or a conditional equation. In Table 3, we
do not find proper axioms. Instead of proper axioms, we find axiom schemas
without side conditions and axiom schemas with side conditions. The axioms of
BTA+REC are obtained by replacing each axiom schema by all its instances.
Henceforth, we write α∗ , where α is a valuation of variables in MBTA+REC ,
for the unique homomorphic extension of α to terms of BTA+REC. Moreover,
we identify t1 = t2 and ∅ ⇒ t1 = t2 .
Proposition 3. Let E ⇒ t1 = t2 be an axiom of BTA+REC, and let α be
a valuation of variables in MBTA+REC . Then |α∗ (t1 )| = |α∗ (t2 )| if |α∗ (t′1 )| =
|α∗ (t′2 )| for all t′1 = t′2 ∈ E.
Proof. The proof is trivial for the axiom of BTA and the axioms RDP and
RSP. Using the equation |πn (T )|c = π2n (|T |c ), the proof is also trivial for the
axioms AIP and P0–P3. This equation is easily proved by induction on n and
case distinction on the structure of T in both the basis step and the inductive
step.
⊓
⊔
16
Remark 3. Proposition 3 would go through if no abstraction of the above-mentioned special termination action was made. Notice further that ACPτ without
the silent step constant and the abstraction operator, better known as ACP,
would suffice if no abstraction of the special termination action was made.
8
A Simple Protocol for Remote Instruction Processing
In this section and the next section, we consider two protocols for remote instruction processing. The simple protocol described in this section is presumably
the most straightforward protocol for remote instruction processing that can be
achieved. Therefore, we consider it a suitable starting-point for the design of
more advanced protocols for remote instruction processing – such as the one described in the next section. Before this simple protocol is described, an extension
of ACP is introduced to simplify the description of the protocols.
The following extension of ACP from [2] will be used: the non-branching
conditional operator :→ over B. The expression b :→ p, is to be read as if b
then p else δ. The additional axioms for the non-branching conditional operator
are
T :→ x = x
and F :→ x = δ .
In the sequel, we will use expressions whose evaluation yields Boolean values
instead of the constants T and F. Because the evaluation of the expressions
concerned are not dependent on the processes denoted by the terms in which they
occur, we will identify each such expression with the constant for the Boolean
value that its evaluation yields. Further justification of this can be found in [9,
Section 9].
The protocols concern systems whose main components are an instruction
stream generator and an instruction stream execution unit. The instruction
stream generator generates different instruction streams for different threads.
This is accomplished by starting it in different states. The general idea of the
protocols is that:
– the instruction stream generator generating an instruction stream for a
thread T E a D T ′ sends a to the instruction stream execution unit;
– on receipt of a, the instruction stream execution unit gets the execution of
a done and sends the reply produced to the instruction stream generator;
– on receipt of the reply, the instruction stream generator proceeds with generating an instruction stream for T if the reply is T and for T ′ otherwise.
In the case where the thread is S or D, the instruction stream generator sends a
special instruction (stop or dead) and the instruction stream execution unit does
not send back a reply.
In this section, we consider a very simple protocol for remote instruction
processing that makes no effort to keep the execution unit busy without intermission.
17
In the protocols, the generation of an instruction stream start from the thread
produced by an instruction sequence under execution instead of the instruction
sequence itself. It follows immediately from the definition of the thread extraction
operation that the threads produced by instruction sequences under execution
are regular threads. Therefore, we restrict ourselves to regular threads.
We write I for the set A∪{stop, dead}. Elements from I will loosely be called
instructions. The restriction of the domain of MBTA+REC to the regular threads
will be denoted by RT .
The functions act , thrt , and thrf defined below give, for each thread T different from S and D, the basic action that T will perform first, the thread with
which it will proceed if the reply from the execution environment is T, and the
thread with which it will proceed if the reply from the execution environment is
F, respectively. The functions act :RT → I, thrt :RT → RT , and thrf :RT → RT
are defined as follows:
thrf (S) = D ,
act (S) = stop ,
thrt (S) = D ,
thrf (D) = D ,
thrt (D) = D ,
act (D) = dead ,
act (T E a D T ′ ) = a , thrt (T E a D T ′ ) = T , thrf (T E a D T ′ ) = T ′ .
The function nxt 0 defined below is used by the instruction stream generator
to distinguish when it starts with handling the instruction to be executed next
between the different instructions that it may be. The function nxt 0 :I ×RT → B
is defined as follows:
T if act (T ) = a
nxt 0 (a, T ) =
F if act (T ) 6= a .
For the purpose of describing the simple protocol outlined above in ACPτ ,
A and | are taken such that, in addition to the conditions mentioned at the
beginning of Section 7, the following conditions are satisfied:
A ⊇ {si (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ I} ∪ {ri (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ I}
∪ {si (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {ri (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {j}
and for all i ∈ {1, 2}, j ∈ {3, 4}, d ∈ I, r ∈ B, and e ∈ A:
si (d) | ri (d) = j ,
si (d) | e = δ
if e 6= ri (d) ,
e | ri (d) = δ
if e 6= si (d) ,
sj (r) | rj (r) = j ,
sj (r) | e = δ
if e 6= rj (r) ,
e | rj (r) = δ
if e 6= sj (r) ,
j|e =δ .
Notice that the set B is the set of replies.
Let T ∈ RT . Then the process representing the simple protocol for remote
instruction processing with regard to thread T is described by
0
∂H (ISGT
k IMTC 0 k RTC 0 k ISEU 0 ) ,
18
0
where the process ISGT
is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
0
ISGT
=
nxt 0 (f.m, T ) :→
f.m∈A
0
0
s1 (f.m) · (r4 (T) · ISGthrt
(T ) + r4 (F) · ISGthrf (T ) )
+ nxt 0 (stop, T ) :→ s1 (stop) + nxt 0 (dead, T ) :→ s1 (dead) ,
the process IMTC 0 is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
IMTC 0 =
r1 (d) · s2 (d) · IMTC 0 ,
d∈I
the process RTC 0 is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
RTC 0 =
r3 (r) · s4 (r) · RTC 0 ,
r∈B
the process ISEU 0 is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
ISEU 0 =
r2 (f.m) · sf (m) · (rf (T) · s3 (T) + rf (F) · s3 (F)) · ISEU 0
f.m∈A
+ r2 (stop) + r2 (dead) · δ
and
H = {si (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ I} ∪ {ri (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ I}
∪ {si (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {ri (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} .
0
ISGT
is the instruction stream generator for thread T , IMTC 0 is the transmission channel for messages containing instructions, RTC 0 is the transmission
channel for replies, and ISEU 0 is the instruction stream execution unit.
If we abstract from all communications via the transmission channels, then
0
the process denoted by ∂H (ISGT
k IMTC 0 k RTC 0 k ISEU 0 ) and the process
|T | are equal modulo an initial silent step.
0
Theorem 1. For each T ∈ RT , τ · τ{j} (∂H (ISGT
k IMTC 0 k RTC 0 k ISEU 0 ))
denotes the process τ · |T |.
Proof. Let T ∈ RT . Moreover, let E be a finite linear recursive specification over
ACPτ with X ∈ V(E) such that |T | is the X-component of the solution of E
in MACPτ +REC . By Proposition 2 and the definition of the process extraction
operation, it is sufficient to prove that
0
τ · τ{j} (∂H (ISGT
k IMTC 0 k RTC 0 k ISEU 0 )) = τ · hX|Ei .
By AIP, it is sufficient to prove that for all n ≥ 0:
0
πn (τ · τ{j} (∂H (ISGT
k IMTC 0 k RTC 0 k ISEU 0 ))) = πn (τ · hX|Ei) .
This is easily proved by induction on n and in the inductive step by case distinction on the structure of T , using the axioms of ACPτ and RDP and in addition
the fact that |T ′ | ∈ Sub(|T |) for all T ′ ∈ Res(T ) and the fact that there exists
an bijection between Sub(|T |) and V(E).
⊓
⊔
19
9
A More Complex Protocol
In this section, we consider a more complex protocol for remote instruction processing that makes an effort to keep the execution unit busy without intermission.
The specifics of the more complex protocol considered here are that:
– the instruction stream generator may run ahead of the instruction stream
execution unit by not waiting for the receipt of the replies resulting from the
execution of instructions that it has sent earlier;
– to ensure that the instruction stream execution unit can handle the runahead, each instruction sent by the instruction stream generator is accompanied with the sequence of replies after which the instruction must be executed;
– to correct for replies that have not yet reached the instruction stream generator, each instruction sent is also accompanied with the number of replies
received since the last sending of an instruction.
This protocol is reminiscent of an instruction pre-fetching mechanism as found in
pipelined processors (see e.g. [26]), but its range of application is not restricted
to pipelined instruction processing.
We write B≤n , where n ∈ N, for the set {u ∈ B∗ | len(u) ≤ n}.5
It is assumed that a natural number ℓ has been given. The number ℓ is
taken for the maximal number of steps that the instruction stream generator
may run ahead of the instruction stream execution unit. Whether the execution
unit can be kept busy without intermission with the given ℓ depends on the
actual execution times of instructions and the actual transmission times over the
transmission channels involved. If the execution unit can be kept busy without
intermission with the given ℓ, then it is useless to increase ℓ.
The set IM of instruction messages is defined as follows:
IM = [0, ℓ] × B≤ℓ × I .
In an instruction message (n, u, a) ∈ IM:
– n is the number of replies that are acknowledged by the message;
– u is the sequence of replies after which the instruction that is part of the
message must be executed;
– a is the instruction that is part of the message.
The instruction stream generator sends instruction messages via an instruction
message transmission channel to the instruction stream execution unit. We refer
to a succession of transmitted instruction messages as an instruction stream. An
instruction stream is dynamic by nature, in contradistinction with an instruction
sequence.
5
As usual, we write D∗ for the set of all finite sequences with elements from set D
and len(σ) for the length of finite sequence σ. Moreover, we write ǫ for the empty
sequence, d for the sequence having d as sole element, σσ ′ for the concatenation of
finite sequences σ and σ ′ , and tl(σ) for the tail of finite sequence σ.
20
The set SISG of instruction stream generator states is defined as follows:
SISG = [0, ℓ] × P(B≤ℓ+1 × RT ) .
In an instruction stream generator state (n, R) ∈ SISG :
– n is the number of replies that has been received by the instruction stream
generator since the last acknowledgement of received replies;
– in each (u, T ) ∈ R, u is the sequence of replies after which the thread T must
be performed.
The functions updpm and updcr defined below are used to model the updates of
the instruction stream generator state on producing a message and consuming
a reply, respectively. The function updpm : (B≤ℓ × RT ) × SISG → SISG is defined
as follows:
updpm((u, T ), (n, R)) =
(0, (R \ {(u, T )}) ∪ {(uT, thrt(T )), (uF, thrf (T ))}) if act (T ) ∈ A
(0, (R \ {(u, T )}))
if act (T ) ∈
/A.
The function updcr : B × SISG → SISG is defined as follows:
updcr (r, (n, R)) = (n + 1, {(u, T ) | (ru, T ) ∈ R}) .
The function sel defined below is used to model the selection of the sequence of
replies and the instruction that will be part of the next message produced by the
instruction stream generator. The function sel : P(B≤ℓ × RT ) → P(B≤ℓ × RT )
is defined as follows:
sel (R) = {(u, T ) ∈ R | ∀(v, T ′ ) ∈ R • len(u) ≤ len(v)} .
Notice that (u, T ) ∈ sel (R) and (v, T ′ ) ∈ R only if len(u) ≤ len(v). By that
breadth-first run-ahead is enforced. The performance of the protocol would
change considerably if breadth-first run-ahead was not enforced.
The set SISEU of instruction stream execution unit states is defined as follows:
SISEU = [0, ℓ] × P(B≤ℓ × I) .
In an instruction stream execution unit state (n, S) ∈ SISEU :
– n is the number of replies for which the instruction stream execution unit
still has to receive an acknowledgement;
– in each (u, a) ∈ S, u is the sequence of replies after which the instruction a
must be executed.
The functions updcm and updpr defined below are used to model the updates
of the instruction stream execution unit state on consuming a message and producing a reply, respectively. The function updcm : IM × SISEU → SISEU is defined
as follows:
.
.
updcm((k, u, a), (n, S)) = (n −
k, S ∪ {(tl n−k (u), a)}) .6
21
The function updpr : B × SISEU → SISEU is defined as follows:
updpr (r, (n, S)) = (n + 1, {(u, a) | (ru, a) ∈ S}) .
The function nxt defined below is used by the instruction stream execution unit
to distinguish when it starts with handling the instruction to be executed next
between the different instructions that it may be. The function nxt : I × P(B≤ℓ ×
I) → B is defined as follows:
T if (ǫ, a) ∈ S
nxt(a, S) =
F if (ǫ, a) ∈
/S.
The instruction stream execution unit sends replies via a reply transmission
channel to the instruction stream generator. We refer to a succession of transmitted replies as a reply stream.
For the purpose of describing the transmission protocol in ACPτ , A and |
are taken such that, in addition to the conditions mentioned at the beginning of
Section 7, the following conditions are satisfied:
A ⊇ {si (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ IM} ∪ {ri (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ IM}
∪ {si (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {ri (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {j}
and for all i ∈ {1, 2}, j ∈ {3, 4}, d ∈ IM, r ∈ B, and e ∈ A:
si (d) | ri (d) = j ,
si (d) | e = δ
if e 6= ri (d) ,
e | ri (d) = δ
if e 6= si (d) ,
sj (r) | rj (r) = j ,
sj (r) | e = δ
if e 6= rj (r) ,
e | rj (r) = δ
if e 6= sj (r) ,
j|e =δ .
Let T ∈ RT . Then the process representing the more complex protocol for
remote instruction processing with regard to thread T is described by
∂H (ISGT k IMTC k RTC k ISEU ) ,
where the process ISGT is recursively specified by the following equations:
ISGT
′
ISG(n,R)
′
= ISG(0,{(ǫ,T
)}) ,
X
′
s1 ((n, u, act (T ))) · ISGupdpm((u,T
=
),(n,R))
(u,T )∈sel(R)
+
X
′
r4 (r) · ISGupdcr
(r,(n,R))
r∈B
(for every (n, R) ∈ SISG with R 6= ∅) ,
′
ISG(n,∅)
=j
(for every (n, ∅) ∈ SISG ) ,
6
.
.
.
As usual, we write i −
j for the monus of i and j, i.e. i −j
= i−j if i ≥ j and i −j
=0
otherwise. As usual, tl n (u) is defined by induction on n as follows: tl 0 (u) = u and
tl n+1 (u) = tl(tl n (u)).
22
the process IMTC is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
IMTC =
r1 (d) · s2 (d) · IMTC ,
d∈IM
the process RTC is recursively specified by the following equation:
X
RTC =
r3 (r) · s4 (r) · RTC ,
r∈B
the process ISEU is recursively specified by the following equations:
ISEU
′
ISEU(n,S)
′
= ISEU (0,∅)
,
X
′
=
r2 (d) · ISEU updcm(d,(n,S))
d∈IM
X
′′
+
nxt(f.m, S) :→ sf (m) · ISEU (f,(n,S))
f.m∈A
+ nxt(stop, S) :→ j + nxt(dead, S) :→ δ
(for every (n, S) ∈ SISEU ) ,
X
′′
′
ISEU(f,(n,S))
=
rf (r) · s3 (r) · ISEU updpr(r,(n,S))
r∈B
X
′′
+
r2 (d) · ISEU (f,updcm(d,(n,S)))
d∈IM
(for every (f, (n, S)) ∈ F × SISEU ) ,
and
H = {si (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ IM} ∪ {ri (d) | i ∈ {1, 2}, d ∈ IM}
∪ {si (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} ∪ {ri (r) | i ∈ {3, 4}, r ∈ B} .
ISGT is the instruction stream generator for thread T , IMTC is the transmission
channel for instruction messages, RTC is the transmission channel for replies,
and ISEU is the instruction stream execution unit.
The protocol described above has been designed such that, for each T ∈ RT ,
τ · τ{j} (∂H (ISGT k IMTC k RTC k ISEU )) denotes the process τ · |T |. We refrain
from presenting a proof of the claim that the protocol satisfies this because this
paper is first and foremost a conceptual paper and the proof is straightforward
but tedious.
The transmission channels IMTC and RTC can keep one instruction message
and one reply, respectively. The protocol has been designed in such a way that
the protocol will also work properly if these channels are replaced by channels
with larger capacity and even by channels with unbounded capacity.
Suppose that the transmission times over the transmission channels are small
compared with the execution times of instructions. Even then the protocol described in Section 8 will always have to idle for a short time after the execution
of an instruction, whereas after an initial phase the protocol described above will
never have to idle after the execution of an instruction if the instruction stream
generator may run a few steps ahead of the instruction stream execution unit.
23
10
Adaptations of the Protocol
In this section, we discuss some conceivable adaptations of the protocol described
in Section 9. While we were thinking through the details of that protocol, various
variations suggested themselves. The variations discussed below are among the
most salient ones. We think they deserve mention. However, their discussion
is not in depth. The reason for this is that these variations have not yet been
investigated thoroughly.
Consider the case where, for each instruction, it is known what the probability
is with which its execution leads to the reply T. This might give reason to
adapt the protocol described in Section 9. Suppose that the instruction stream
generator states do not only keep the sequences of replies after which threads
must be performed, but also the sequences of instructions involved in producing
those sequences of replies. Then the probability with which the sequences of
replies will happen can be calculated and several conceivable adaptations of the
protocol to this probabilistic knowledge are possible by mere changes in the
selection of the sequence of replies and the instruction that will be part of the
next instruction message produced by the instruction stream generator. Among
those adaptations are:
– restricting the instruction messages that are produced ahead to the ones
where the sequence of replies after which the instruction must be executed
will happen with a probability ≥ 0.50, but sticking to breadth-first runahead;
– restricting the instruction messages that are produced ahead to the ones
where the sequence of replies after which the instruction must be executed
will happen with a probability ≥ 0.95, but not sticking to breadth-first runahead.
At first sight, these adaptations are reminiscent of combinations of an instruction
pre-fetching mechanism and a branch prediction mechanism as found in pipelined
processors (see e.g. [26]). However, usually branch prediction mechanisms make
use of statistics based on recently processed instructions instead of probabilistic
knowledge of the kind used in the protocols sketched above.
Regular threads can be represented in such a way that it is effectively decidable whether the two threads with which a thread may proceed after performing
its first action are identical. Consider the case where threads are represented in
the instruction stream generator states in such a way. Then the protocol can be
adapted such that no duplication of instruction messages takes place in the cases
where the two threads with which a thread possibly proceeds after performing
its first action are identical. This can be accomplished by using sequences of
elements from B ∪ {∗}, instead of sequences of elements from B, in instruction
messages, instruction stream generator states, and instruction stream execution
unit states. The occurrence of ∗ at position i in a sequence indicates that the
ith reply may be either T or F. The impact of this change on the updates of
instruction stream generator states and instruction stream execution unit states
is minor. This adaptation is reminiscent of an instruction pre-fetch mechanism
24
as found in pipelined processors that prevents instruction pre-fetches that are
superfluous due to identity of branches.
11
Alternative Choice Instructions
Process algebra is an area of the study of concurrency which is considered relevant to computer science, as is witnesses by the extent of the work on algebraic
theories of processes such as ACP, CCS and CSP in theoretical computer science. This strongly hints that there are programmed systems whose behaviours
can be taken for processes as considered in process algebra. Therefore, it is interesting to know to which extent the behaviours considered in process algebra
can be produced by programs under execution, starting from the perception of
a program as an instruction sequence. In coming sections, we will establish results concerning the processes as considered in ACP that can be produced by
instruction sequences under execution.
For the purpose of producing processes as considered in ACP, we need a version of PGA with special basic instructions to deal with the non-deterministic
choice between alternatives that stems from the alternative composition of processes. Recall that, in PGA, it is assumed that a fixed but arbitrary set A of
basic instructions has been given. In the coming sections, we will make use a
version of PGA in which the following additional assumptions relating to A are
made:
–
–
–
–
a fixed but arbitrary finite set F of foci has been given;
a fixed but arbitrary finite set M of methods has been given;
a fixed but arbitrary set AA of atomic actions, with t ∈
/ AA, has been given;
A = {f.m | f ∈ F , m ∈ M} ∪ {ac(e1 , e2 ) | e1 , e2 ∈ AA ∪ {t}}.
On execution of a basic instruction ac(e1 , e2 ), first a non-deterministic choice
between the atomic actions e1 and e2 is made and then the chosen atomic action
is performed. The reply T is produced if e1 is performed and the reply F is produced if e2 is performed. Basic instructions of this kind are material to produce
all regular processes by means of instruction sequences. A basic instruction of
the form ac(e1 , e2 ) is called an alternative choice instruction. Henceforth, we will
write PGAac for the version of PGA with alternative choice instructions.
The intuition concerning alternative choice instructions given above will be
made fully precise at the end of this section, using ACPτ . It will not be made
fully precise using an extension of BTA because it is considered a basic property
of threads that they are deterministic behaviours.
Recall that we make use of a version of BTA in which A = A. A basic action
of the form ac(e1 , e2 ) is called an alternative choice action. Henceforth, we will
write BTAac for the version of BTA with alternative choice actions.
For the purpose of making precise what processes are produced by the threads
denoted by closed terms of BTAac +REC, A and | are taken such that, in addition to the conditions mentioned at the beginning of Section 7, the following
conditions are satisfied:
A ⊇ AA ∪ {t}
25
Table 8. Additional defining equation for process extraction operation
|T E ac(e, e′ ) D T ′ |c = e · |T |c + e′ · |T ′ |c
and for all e, e′ ∈ A:
e′ | e = δ if e′ ∈ AA ∪ {t} .
The process extraction operation for BTAac has as defining equations the
equations given in Table 7 and in addition the equation given in Table 8.
Proposition 3 goes through for BTAac .
12
Instruction Sequence Producible Processes
It follows immediately from the definitions of the thread extraction and process
extraction operations that the instruction sequences considered in PGA produce
regular processes. The question is whether all regular processes are producible by
these instruction sequences. In this section, we show that all regular processes can
be produced by the instruction sequences with alternative choice instructions.
We will make use of the fact that all regular threads over A can be produced
by the single-pass instruction sequences considered in PGA.
Proposition 4. For each thread T that is regular over A, there exists a PGA
instruction sequence F such that F produces T , i.e. |F | = T .
Proof. By Proposition 1, T is a component of the solution of some finite linear recursive specification E over BTA. There occur finitely many variables X0 , . . . , Xn
in E. Assume that T is the X0 -component of the solution of E. Let F be the PGA
instruction sequence (F0 ; . . . ; Fn )ω , where Fi is defined as follows (0 ≤ i ≤ n):
!;!;!
#0 ; #0 ; #0
+a ; #3·(j−i)−1 ; #3·(k−i)−2
Fi =
+a ; #3·(j−i)−1 ; #3·(n+1−(i−k))−2
+a ; #3·(n+1−(i−j))−1 ; #3·(k−i)−2
+a ; #3·(n+1−(i−j))−1 ; #3·(n+1−(i−k))−2
if
if
if
if
if
if
Xi
Xi
Xi
Xi
Xi
Xi
=
=
=
=
=
=
S∈E
D∈E
Xj E a D Xk
Xj E a D Xk
Xj E a D Xk
Xj E a D Xk
∈
∈
∈
∈
E
E
E
E
∧i
∧i
∧i
∧i
<
<
≥
≥
j
j
j
j
∧i
∧i
∧i
∧i
<
≥
<
≥
k
k
k
k.
Then F is a PGA instruction sequence such that the interpretation of |F | = T .
⊓
⊔
All regular processes over AA can be produced by the instruction sequences
considered in PGAac .
Theorem 2. Assume that CFAR is valid in MACPτ +REC . Then, for each process P that is regular over AA, there exists an instruction sequence F in which
only basic instructions of the form ac(e, t) occur such that F produces P , i.e.
τ · τ{t} (||F ||) = τ · P .
26
Proof. By Propositions 1, 2 and 4, it is sufficient to show that, for each finite
linear recursive specification E over ACPτ in which only atomic actions from AA
occur, there exists a finite linear recursive specification E ′ over BTAac in which
only basic actions of the form ac(e, t) occur such that τ ·hX|Ei = τ ·τ{t} (|hX|E ′ i|)
for all X ∈ V(E).
Take the finite linear recursive specification E over ACPτ that consists of
the recursion equations
Xi = ei1 · Xi1 + . . . + eiki · Xiki + e′i1 + . . . + e′ili ,
where ei1 , . . . , eiki , e′i1 , . . . , e′ili ∈ AA, for i ∈ {1, . . . n}. Then construct the finite linear recursive specification E ′ over BTAac that consists of the recursion
equations
Xi = Xi1 E ac(ei1 , t) D (. . . (Xiki E ac(eiki , t) D
(S E ac(e′i1 , t) D (. . . (S E ac(e′ili , t) D Xi ) . . .))) . . .)
for i ∈ {1, . . . n}; and the finite linear recursive specification E ′′ over ACPτ that
consists of the recursion equations
Zi1 = e′i1 + t · Zi2 ,
Zi2 = e′i2 + t · Zi3 ,
..
.
Zili = e′ili + t · Xi ,
Xi = ei1 · Xi1 + t · Yi2 ,
Yi2 = ei2 · Xi2 + t · Yi3 ,
..
.
Yiki = eiki · Xiki + t · Zi1 ,
where Yi2 , . . . , Yiki , Zi1 , . . . , Zili are fresh variables, for i ∈ {1, . . . n}. It follows immediately from the definition of the process extraction operation that
|hX|E ′ i| = hX|E ′′ i for all X ∈ V(E). Moreover, it follows from CFAR that
τ ·hX|Ei = τ ·τ{t} (hX|E ′′ i) for all X ∈ V(E). Hence, τ ·hX|Ei = τ ·τ{t} (|hX|E ′ i|)
for all X ∈ V(E).
⊓
⊔
For example, assuming that CFAR is valid, the instruction sequence
(+ac(r3 (T), t) ; #4 ; +ac(r3 (F), t) ; #5 ; #7;
+ac(s4 (T), t) ; #5 ; #9 ; +ac(s4 (F), t) ; #2 ; #9)ω
produces the reply transmission channel process RTC of which a guarded recursive specification is given in Section 9.
Remark 4. Theorem 2 with “τ · τ{t} (||F ||) = τ · P ” replaced by “||F || = P ” can
be established if PGA is extended with multiple-reply test instructions, see [11].
In that case, the assumption that CFAR is valid is superfluous.
13
Services and Use Operators
An instruction sequence under execution may make use of services. That is,
certain instructions may be executed for the purpose of having the behaviour
27
produced by the instruction sequence affected by a service that takes those instructions as commands to be processed. Likewise, a thread may perform certain
actions for the purpose of having itself affected by a service that takes those actions as commands to be processed. The processing of an action may involve a
change of state of the service and at completion of the processing of the action
the service returns a reply value to the thread. The reply value determines how
the thread proceeds. The use operators can be used in combination with the
thread extraction operation from Section 4 to describe the behaviour produced
by instruction sequences that make use of services. In this section, we first review
the use operators, which are concerned with threads making such use of services,
and then extend the process extraction operation to the use operators.
A service H consists of
–
–
–
–
a set S of states;
an effect function eff : M × S → S;
a yield function yld : M × S → B ∪ {B};
an initial state s0 ∈ S;
satisfying the following condition:
∀m ∈ M, s ∈ S • (yld (m, s) = B ⇒ ∀m′ ∈ M • yld (m′ , eff (m, s)) = B) .
The set S contains the states in which the service may be, and the functions eff
and yld give, for each method m and state s, the state and reply, respectively,
that result from processing m in state s. By the condition imposed on services,
once the service has returned B as reply, it keeps returning B as reply.
Let H = (S, eff , yld , s0 ) be a service and let m ∈ M. Then the derived service
∂
H, is the service (S, eff , yld , eff (m, s0 )); and
of H after processing m, written ∂m
the reply of H after processing m, written H(m), is yld (m, s0 ).
When a thread makes a request to the service to process m:
– if H(m) 6= B, then the request is accepted, the reply is H(m), and the service
∂
proceeds as ∂m
H;
– if H(m) = B, then the request is rejected and the service proceeds as a
service that rejects any request.
We introduce the sort S of services. However, we will not introduce constants
and operators to build terms of this sort. The sort S, standing for the set of all
services, is considered a parameter of the extension of BTA being presented.
Moreover, we introduce, for each f ∈ F , the binary use operator /f : T × S → T.
The axioms for these operators are given in Table 9. Intuitively, T /f H is the
thread that results from processing all actions performed by thread T that are
of the form f.m by service H. When a basic action of the form f.m performed
by thread T is processed by service H, it is turned into the basic action tau and
postconditional composition is removed in favour of basic action prefixing on the
basis of the reply value produced.
We add the use operators to PGAac as well. We will only use the extension
in combination with the thread extraction operation | | and define |F /f H| =
28
Table 9. Axioms for use operators
S /f H = S
D /f H = D
(x E tau D y) /f H = (x /f H) E tau D (y /f H)
(x E g.m D y) /f H = (x /f H) E g.m D (y /f H) if f 6= g
∂
H)
if H(m) = T
(x E f.m D y) /f H = tau ◦ (x /f ∂m
∂
(x E f.m D y) /f H = tau ◦ (y /f ∂m
H)
if H(m) = F
(x E f.m D y) /f H = tau ◦ D
if H(m) = B
(x E ac(e1 , e2 ) D y) /f H = (x /f H) E ac(e1 , e2 ) D (y /f H)
πn (x /f H) = πn (πn (x) /f H)
U1
U2
U3
U4
U5
U6
U7
U8
U9
|F | /f H. Hence, |F /f H| denotes the thread produced by F if F makes use of
H. If H is a service such as an unbounded counter, an unbounded stack or a
Turing tape, then a non-regular thread may be produced.
In order to extend the process extraction operation to the use operators, we
need an extension of ACPτ with action renaming operators ρh , where h:Aτ → Aτ
such that h(τ ) = τ . The axioms for action renaming are given in [24]. Intuitively,
ρh (P ) behaves as P with each atomic action replaced according to h. We write
ρe′ 7→e′′ for the renaming operator ρh with h defined by h(e′ ) = e′′ and h(e) = e
if e 6= e′ .
For the purpose of extending the process extraction operation to the use
operators, A and | are taken such that, in addition to the conditions mentioned
at the beginning of Section 7, with everywhere B replaced by B ∪ {B}, and
the conditions mentioned at the end of Section 11, the following conditions are
satisfied:
A ⊇ {sserv (r) | r ∈ B ∪ {B}} ∪ {rserv (m) | m ∈ M} ∪ {stop∗ }
and for all e ∈ A, m ∈ M, and r ∈ B ∪ {B}:
sserv (r) | e = δ ,
e | rserv (m) = δ ,
stop | stop = stop∗ ,
stop∗ | e = δ .
We also need to define a set Af ⊆ A and a function hf : Aτ → Aτ for each
f ∈ F:
Af = {sf (d) | d ∈ M ∪ B ∪ {B}} ∪ {rf (d) | d ∈ M ∪ B ∪ {B}} ;
for all e ∈ Aτ , m ∈ M and r ∈ B ∪ {B}:
hf (sserv (r)) = sf (r) ,
hf (rserv (m)) = rf (m) ,
V
V
hf (e) = e
if r′ ∈N e 6= sserv (r′ ) ∧ m′ ∈M e 6= rserv (m′ ) .
To extend the process extraction operation to the use operators, the defining equation concerning the postconditional composition operators has to be
adapted and a new defining equation concerning the use operators has to be
29
Table 10. Adapted and additional defining equations for process extraction operation
|T E f.m D T ′ |c = sf (m) · (rf (T) · |T |c + rf (F) · |T ′ |c + rf (B) · δ)
|T /f H|c = ρstop∗ 7→stop (∂{stop} (∂Af (|T |c k ρhf (|H|c ))))
added. These two equations are given in Table 10, where |H|c is the XH component of the solution of
X
{XH ′ =
rserv (m) · sserv (H ′ (m)) · X ∂ H ′ + stop | H ′ ∈ ∆(H)} ,
∂m
m∈M
where ∆(H) is inductively defined as follows:
– H ∈ ∆(H);
– if m ∈ M and H ′ ∈ ∆(H), then
∂
′
∂m H
∈ ∆(H).
The extended process extraction operation preserves the axioms for the use
operators. Owing to the presence of axiom schemas with semantic side conditions
in Table 9, the axioms for the use operators include proper axioms, which are
all of the form t1 = t2 , and axioms that have a semantic side condition, which
are all of the form t1 = t2 if H(m) = r. By that, the precise formulation of the
preservation result is somewhat complicated.
Proposition 5.
1. Let t1 = t2 be a proper axiom for the use operators, and let α be a valuation
of variables in MBTA+REC . Then |α∗ (t1 )| = |α∗ (t2 )|.
2. Let t1 = t2 if H(m) = r be an axiom with semantic side condition for the
use operators, and let α be a valuation of variables in MBTA+REC . Then
|α∗ (t1 )| = |α∗ (t2 )| if H(m) = r.
Proof. The proof is straightforward. We sketch the proof for axiom U5. By
the definition of the process extraction operation, it is sufficient to show that
∂
H)|c if H(m) = T. In outline, this goes
|(T E f.m D T ′ ) /f H|c = |tau ◦ (T /f ∂m
as follows:
|(T E f.m D T ′ ) /f H|c
= ρstop∗ 7→stop
(∂{stop} (∂Af (sf (m) · (rf (T) · |T |c + rf (F) · |T ′ |c + rf (B) · δ) k ρhf (|H|c ))))
∂
H|c ))))
= i · i · ρstop∗ 7→stop (∂{stop} (∂Af (|T |c k ρhf (| ∂m
∂
c
= |tau ◦ (T /f ∂m H)| .
In the first and third step, we apply defining equations of | |c . In the second step,
we apply axioms of ACPτ +REC with action renaming, and use that H(m) = T.
⊓
⊔
Remark 5. Let F be a PGAac instruction sequence and H be a service. Then
||F /f H|| is the process produced by F if F makes use of H. Instruction sequences
that make use of services such as unbounded counters, unbounded stacks or
Turing tapes are interesting because they may produce non-regular processes.
30
14
PGLD Programs and the Use of Boolean Registers
In this section, we show that all regular processes can also be produced by
programs written in a program notation which is close to existing assembly
languages, and even by programs in which no atomic action occurs more than
once in an alternative choice instruction. The latter result requires programs
that make use of Boolean registers.
A hierarchy of program notations rooted in PGA is introduced in [8]. One
program notation that belongs to this hierarchy is PGLD, a very simple program
notation which is close to existing assembly languages. It has absolute jump
instructions and no explicit termination instruction.
In PGLD, like in PGA, it is assumed that there is a fixed but arbitrary finite
set of basic instructions A. The primitive instructions of PGLD differ from the
primitive instructions of PGA as follows: for each l ∈ N, there is an absolute jump
instruction ##l instead of a forward jump instruction #l. PGLD programs have
the form u1 ; . . . ; uk , where u1 , . . . , uk are primitive instructions of PGLD.
The effects of all instructions in common with PGA are as in PGA with one
difference: if there is no next instruction to be executed, termination occurs. The
effect of an absolute jump instruction ##l is that execution proceeds with the
l-th instruction of the program concerned. If ##l is itself the l-th instruction,
then inaction occurs. If l equals 0 or l is greater than the length of the program,
then termination occurs.
We define the meaning of PGLD programs by means of a function pgld2pga
from the set of all PGLD programs to the set of all closed PGA terms. This
function is defined by
pgld2pga(u1 ; . . . ; uk ) = (φ1 (u1 ) ; . . . ; φk (uk ) ; ! ; !)ω ,
where the auxiliary functions φj from the set of all primitive instructions of
PGLD to the set of all primitive instructions of PGA are defined as follows
(1 ≤ j ≤ k):
φj (##l) = #l − j
if
φj (##l) = #k + 2 − (j − l) if
φj (##l) = !
if
φj (u)
=u
if
j≤l≤k,
0<l<j,
l =0∨l >k ,
u is not a jump instruction .
PGLD is as expressive as PGA. Before we make this fully precise, we introduce a useful notation.
Let α is a valuation of variables in I PGA , and let α∗ be the unique homomorphic extension of α to terms of PGA. Then α∗ (t) is independent of α if t is
a closed term, i.e. α∗ (t) is uniquely determined by I PGA . Therefore, we write
tI PGA for α∗ (t) if t is a closed term.
Proposition 6. For each closed PGA term t, there exists a PGLD program p
such that |tI PGA | = |pgld2pga(p)I PGA |.
31
Proof. In [8], a number of functions (called embeddings in that paper) are defined, whose composition gives, for each closed PGA term t, a PGLD program
p such that |tI PGA | = |pgld2pga(p)I PGA |.
⊓
⊔
Let p be a PGLD program and P be a process. Then we say that p produces
P if |pgld2pga(p)I PGA | produces P .
Below, we will write PGLDac for the version of PGLD in which the additional
assumptions relating to A mentioned in Section 11 are made. As a corollary of
Theorem 2 and Proposition 6, we have that all regular processes over AA can
be produced by PGLDac programs.
Corollary 1. Assume that CFAR is valid in MACPτ +REC . Then, for each process P that is regular over AA, there exists a PGLDac program p such that p
produces P .
We switch to the use of Boolean registers now. First, we describe services
that make up Boolean registers.
A Boolean register service accepts the following methods:
– a set to true method set:T;
– a set to false method set:F;
– a get method get.
We write MBR for the set {set:T, set:F, get}. It is assumed that MBR ⊆ M.
The methods accepted by Boolean register services can be explained as follows:
– set:T : the contents of the Boolean register becomes T and the reply is T;
– set:F : the contents of the Boolean register becomes F and the reply is F;
– get : nothing changes and the reply is the contents of the Boolean register.
Let s ∈ B ∪ {B}. Then the Boolean register service with initial state s,
written BR s , is the service (B ∪ {B}, eff , eff , s), where the function eff is defined
as follows (b ∈ B):
eff (set:T, b) = T ,
eff (set:F, b) = F ,
eff (get, b) = b ,
eff (m, b) = B if m 6∈ MBR ,
eff (m, B) = B .
Notice that the effect and yield functions of a Boolean register service are the
same.
Let p be a PGLD program and P be a process. Then we say that p produces
P using Boolean registers if (. . . (|pgld2pga(p)I PGA | /br:1 BR F ) . . . /br:k BR F ) produces P for some k ∈ N+ .
We have that PGLDac programs in which no atomic action from AA occurs more than once in an alternative choice instruction can produce all regular
processes over AA using Boolean registers.
32
Theorem 3. Assume that CFAR is valid in MACPτ +REC . Then, for each process P that is regular over AA, there exists a PGLDac program p in which each
atomic action from AA occurs no more than once in an alternative choice instruction such that p produces P using Boolean registers.
Proof. By the proof of Theorem 2 given in Section 12, it is sufficient to show
that, for each thread T that is regular over A, there exist a PGLD program p
in which each basic action from A occurs no more than once and a k ∈ N+ such
that (. . . (|pgld2pga(p)I PGA | /br:1 BR F ) . . . /br:k BR F ) = T .
Let T be a thread that is regular over A. We may assume that T is produced
by a PGLD program p′ of the following form:
+a1 ; ##(3 · k1 + 1) ; ##(3 · k1′ + 1) ;
..
.
+an ; ##(3 · kn + 1) ; ##(3 · kn′ + 1) ;
##0 ; ##0 ; ##0 ; ##(3 · n + 4) ,
where, for each i ∈ [1, n], ki , ki′ ∈ [0, n − 1] (cf. the proof of Proposition 2
from [36]). It is easy to see that the PGLD program p that we are looking for
can be obtained by transforming p′ : by making use of n Boolean registers, p can
distinguish between different occurrences of the same basic instruction in p′ , and
in that way simulate p′ .
⊓
⊔
15
Conclusions
Using the algebraic theory of processes known as ACP, we have described two
protocols to deal with the phenomenon that, on execution of an instruction sequence, a stream of instructions to be processed arises at one place and the
processing of that stream of instructions is handled at another place. The more
complex protocol is directed towards keeping the execution unit busy. In this
way, we have brought the phenomenon better into the picture and have ascribed
a sense to the term instruction stream which makes clear that an instruction
stream is dynamic by nature, in contradistinction with an instruction sequence.
We have also discussed some conceivable adaptations of the more complex protocol.
The description of the protocols start from the behaviours produced by instruction sequences under execution. By that we abstract from the instruction
sequences which produce those behaviours. How instruction streams can be generated efficiently from instruction sequences is a matter that obviously requires
investigations at a less abstract level. The investigations in question are an option
for future work.
We believe that the more complex protocol described in this paper provides
a setting in which basic techniques aimed at increasing processor performance,
such as pre-fetching and branch prediction, can be studied at a more abstract
level than usual (cf. [26]). In particular, we think that the protocol can serve
33
as a starting-point for the development of a model with which trade-offs encountered in the design of processor architectures can be clarified. We consider
investigations into this matter an interesting option for future work.
The fact that process algebra is an area of the study of concurrency which
is considered relevant to computer science, strongly hints that there are programmed systems whose behaviours are taken for processes as considered in
process algebra. In that light, we have investigated the connections between
programs and the processes that they produce, starting from the perception of a
program as an instruction sequence. We have shown that, by apposite choice of
basic instructions, all regular processes can be produced by means of instruction
sequences as considered in PGA.
We have also made precise what processes are produced by instruction sequences under execution that make use of services. The reason for this is that
instruction sequences under execution are regular threads and regular threads
that make use of services such as unbounded counters, unbounded stacks or Turing tapes may produce non-regular processes. An option for future work is to
characterize the classes of processes that can be produced by single-pass instruction sequences that make use of such services.
References
1. Arora, S., Barak, B.: Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge (2009)
2. Baeten, J.C.M., Bergstra, J.A.: Process algebra with signals and conditions. In:
Broy, M. (ed.) Programming and Mathematical Methods. NATO ASI Series, vol.
F88, pp. 273–323. Springer-Verlag (1992)
3. Baeten, J.C.M., Weijland, W.P.: Process Algebra, Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical
Computer Science, vol. 18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
4. Baker, H.G.: Precise instruction scheduling without a precise machine model.
SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 19(6), 4–8 (1991)
5. Bergstra, J.A., Bethke, I.: Polarized process algebra and program equivalence. In:
Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) Proceedings 30th
ICALP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2719, pp. 1–21. Springer-Verlag
(2003)
6. Bergstra, J.A., Klop, J.W.: Process algebra for synchronous communication. Information and Control 60(1–3), 109–137 (1984)
7. Bergstra, J.A., Loots, M.E.: Program algebra for component code. Formal Aspects
of Computing 12(1), 1–17 (2000)
8. Bergstra, J.A., Loots, M.E.: Program algebra for sequential code. Journal of Logic
and Algebraic Programming 51(2), 125–156 (2002)
9. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Splitting bisimulations and retrospective conditions. Information and Computation 204(7), 1083–1138 (2006)
10. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Maurer computers with single-thread control.
Fundamenta Informaticae 80(4), 333–362 (2007)
11. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Instruction sequences for the production of processes. arXiv:0811.0436v2 [cs.PL] (November 2008)
12. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Program algebra with a jump-shift instruction.
Journal of Applied Logic 6(4), 553–563 (2008)
34
13. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: A protocol for instruction stream processing.
arXiv:0905.2257v1 [cs.PL] (May 2009)
14. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Transmission protocols for instruction streams.
In: Leucker, M., Morgan, C. (eds.) ICTAC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5684, pp. 127–139. Springer-Verlag (2009)
15. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Instruction sequences and non-uniform complexity theory. arXiv:0809.0352v3 [cs.CC] (July 2010)
16. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: On the operating unit size of load/store architectures. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 20(3), 395–417 (2010)
17. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Indirect jumps improve instruction sequence
performance. arXiv:0909.2089v2 [cs.PL] (December 2011)
18. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Thread extraction for polyadic instruction sequences. Scientific Annals of Computer Science 21(2), 283–310 (2011)
19. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: Instruction sequence processing operators. Acta
Informatica 49(3), 139–172 (2012)
20. Bergstra, J.A., Middelburg, C.A.: On the expressiveness of single-pass instruction
sequences. Theory of Computing Systems 50(2), 313–328 (2012)
21. Bergstra, J.A., Ponse, A.: An instruction sequence semigroup with involutive antiautomorphisms. Scientific Annals of Computer Science 19, 57–92 (2009)
22. Brock, C., Hunt, W.A.: Formally specifying and mechanically verifying programs
for the Motorola complex arithmetic processor DSP. In: ICCD ’97. pp. 31–36 (1997)
23. Brookes, S.D., Hoare, C.A.R., Roscoe, A.W.: A theory of communicating sequential
processes. Journal of the ACM 31(3), 560–599 (1984)
24. Fokkink, W.J.: Introduction to Process Algebra. Texts in Theoretical Computer
Science, An EATCS Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2000)
25. Hennessy, J., Jouppi, N., Przybylski, S., Rowen, C., Gross, T., Baskett, F., Gill,
J.: MIPS: A microprocessor architecture. In: MICRO ’82. pp. 17–22 (1982)
26. Hennessy, J.L., Patterson, D.A.: Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, third edn. (2003)
27. Hennessy, M., Milner, R.: Algebraic laws for non-determinism and concurrency.
Journal of the ACM 32(1), 137–161 (1985)
28. Hermes, H.: Enumerability, Decidability, Computability. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
(1965)
29. Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs (1985)
30. Lunde, A.: Empirical evaluation of some features of instruction set processor architectures. Communications of the ACM 20(3), 143–153 (1977)
31. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
(1989)
32. Mosses, P.D.: Formal semantics of programming languages — an overview. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 148, 41–73 (2006)
33. Nair, R., Hopkins, M.E.: Exploiting instruction level parallelism in processors by
caching scheduled groups. SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 25(2), 13–25
(1997)
34. Ofelt, D., Hennessy, J.L.: Efficient performance prediction for modern microprocessors. In: SIGMETRICS ’00. pp. 229–239 (2000)
35. Patterson, D.A., Ditzel, D.R.: The case for the reduced instruction set computer.
SIGARCH Computer Architecture News 8(6), 25–33 (1980)
36. Ponse, A., van der Zwaag, M.B.: An introduction to program and thread algebra.
In: Beckmann, A., et al. (eds.) CiE 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol.
3988, pp. 445–458. Springer-Verlag (2006)
35
37. Sannella, D., Tarlecki, A.: Algebraic preliminaries. In: Astesiano, E., Kreowski,
H.J., Krieg-Brückner, B. (eds.) Algebraic Foundations of Systems Specification,
pp. 13–30. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999)
38. Sipser, M.: Introduction to the Theory of Computation. Thomson, Boston, MA,
second edn. (2006)
39. Tennenhouse, D.L., Wetherall, D.J.: Towards an active network architecture. SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37(5), 81–94 (2007)
40. Wirsing, M.: Algebraic specification. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 675–788. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)
41. Xia, C., Torrellas, J.: Instruction prefetching of systems codes with layout optimized for reduced cache misses. In: ISCA ’96. pp. 271–282 (1996)
36
| 6cs.PL
|
On the Origin of Deep Learning
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Haohan Wang
[email protected]
Bhiksha Raj
[email protected]
arXiv:1702.07800v4 [cs.LG] 3 Mar 2017
Language Technologies Institute
School of Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
This paper is a review of the evolutionary history of deep learning models. It covers from
the genesis of neural networks when associationism modeling of the brain is studied, to the
models that dominate the last decade of research in deep learning like convolutional neural
networks, deep belief networks, and recurrent neural networks. In addition to a review of
these models, this paper primarily focuses on the precedents of the models above, examining
how the initial ideas are assembled to construct the early models and how these preliminary
models are developed into their current forms. Many of these evolutionary paths last more
than half a century and have a diversity of directions. For example, CNN is built on prior
knowledge of biological vision system; DBN is evolved from a trade-off of modeling power
and computation complexity of graphical models and many nowadays models are neural
counterparts of ancient linear models. This paper reviews these evolutionary paths and
offers a concise thought flow of how these models are developed, and aims to provide a
thorough background for deep learning. More importantly, along with the path, this paper
summarizes the gist behind these milestones and proposes many directions to guide the
future research of deep learning.
1
Wang and Raj
1. Introduction
Deep learning has dramatically improved the state-of-the-art in many different artificial
intelligent tasks like object detection, speech recognition, machine translation (LeCun et al.,
2015). Its deep architecture nature grants deep learning the possibility of solving many more
complicated AI tasks (Bengio, 2009). As a result, researchers are extending deep learning
to a variety of different modern domains and tasks in additional to traditional tasks like
object detection, face recognition, or language models, for example, Osako et al. (2015) uses
the recurrent neural network to denoise speech signals, Gupta et al. (2015) uses stacked
autoencoders to discover clustering patterns of gene expressions. Gatys et al. (2015) uses a
neural model to generate images with different styles. Wang et al. (2016) uses deep learning
to allow sentiment analysis from multiple modalities simultaneously, etc. This period is the
era to witness the blooming of deep learning research.
However, to fundamentally push the deep learning research frontier forward, one needs
to thoroughly understand what has been attempted in the history and why current models
exist in present forms. This paper summarizes the evolutionary history of several different
deep learning models and explains the main ideas behind these models and their relationship
to the ancestors. To understand the past work is not trivial as deep learning has evolved
over a long time of history, as showed in Table 1. Therefore, this paper aims to offer the
readers a walk-through of the major milestones of deep learning research. We will cover the
milestones as showed in Table 1, as well as many additional works. We will split the story
into different sections for the clearness of presentation.
This paper starts the discussion from research on the human brain modeling. Although
the success of deep learning nowadays is not necessarily due to its resemblance of the human
brain (more due to its deep architecture), the ambition to build a system that simulate brain
indeed thrust the initial development of neural networks. Therefore, the next section begins
with connectionism and naturally leads to the age when shallow neural network matures.
With the maturity of neural networks, this paper continues to briefly discuss the necessity of extending shallow neural networks into deeper ones, as well as the promises deep
neural networks make and the challenges deep architecture introduces.
With the establishment of the deep neural network, this paper diverges into three different popular deep learning topics. Specifically, in Section 4, this paper elaborates how
Deep Belief Nets and its construction component Restricted Boltzmann Machine evolve as a
trade-off of modeling power and computation loads. In Section 5, this paper focuses on the
development history of Convolutional Neural Network, featured with the prominent steps
along the ladder of ImageNet competition. In Section 6, this paper discusses the development of Recurrent Neural Networks, its successors like LSTM, attention models and the
successes they achieved.
While this paper primarily discusses deep learning models, optimization of deep architecture is an inevitable topic in this society. Section 7 is devoted to a brief summary of
optimization techniques, including advanced gradient method, Dropout, Batch Normalization, etc.
This paper could be read as a complementary of (Schmidhuber, 2015). Schmidhuber’s
paper is aimed to assign credit to all those who contributed to the present state of the art,
so his paper focuses on every single incremental work along the path, therefore cannot elab2
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Year
300 BC
1873
1943
1949
1958
1974
1980
1982
1985
1986
1990
1997
2006
2009
2012
Table 1: Major milestones that will be covered in this paper
Contributer
Contribution
introduced Associationism, started the history of human’s
Aristotle
attempt to understand brain.
introduced Neural Groupings as the earliest models of
Alexander Bain
neural network, inspired Hebbian Learning Rule.
introduced MCP Model, which is considered as the
McCulloch & Pitts
ancestor of Artificial Neural Model.
considered as the father of neural networks, introduced
Donald Hebb
Hebbian Learning Rule, which lays the foundation of
modern neural network.
introduced the first perceptron, which highly resembles
Frank Rosenblatt
modern perceptron.
Paul Werbos
introduced Backpropagation
Teuvo Kohonen
introduced Self Organizing Map
introduced Neocogitron, which inspired Convolutional
Kunihiko Fukushima
Neural Network
John Hopfield
introduced Hopfield Network
Hilton & Sejnowski
introduced Boltzmann Machine
introduced Harmonium, which is later known as Restricted
Paul Smolensky
Boltzmann Machine
Michael I. Jordan
defined and introduced Recurrent Neural Network
introduced LeNet, showed the possibility of deep neural
Yann LeCun
networks in practice
Schuster & Paliwal
introduced Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network
Hochreiter &
introduced LSTM, solved the problem of vanishing
Schmidhuber
gradient in recurrent neural networks
introduced Deep Belief Networks, also introduced
Geoffrey Hinton
layer-wise pretraining technique, opened current deep
learning era.
Salakhutdinov &
introduced Deep Boltzmann Machines
Hinton
introduced Dropout, an efficient way of training neural
Geoffrey Hinton
networks
3
Wang and Raj
orate well enough on each of them. On the other hand, our paper is aimed at providing the
background for readers to understand how these models are developed. Therefore, we emphasize on the milestones and elaborate those ideas to help build associations between these
ideas. In addition to the paths of classical deep learning models in (Schmidhuber, 2015),
we also discuss those recent deep learning work that builds from classical linear models.
Another article that readers could read as a complementary is (Anderson and Rosenfeld,
2000) where the authors conducted extensive interviews with well-known scientific leaders
in the 90s on the topic of the neural networks’ history.
4
On the Origin of Deep Learning
2. From Aristotle to Modern Artificial Neural Networks
The study of deep learning and artificial neural networks originates from our ambition to
build a computer system simulating the human brain. To build such a system requires
understandings of the functionality of our cognitive system. Therefore, this paper traces all
the way back to the origins of attempts to understand the brain and starts the discussion
of Aristotle’s Associationism around 300 B.C.
2.1 Associationism
“When, therefore, we accomplish an act of reminiscence, we pass through a
certain series of precursive movements, until we arrive at a movement on which
the one we are in quest of is habitually consequent. Hence, too, it is that we
hunt through the mental train, excogitating from the present or some other,
and from similar or contrary or coadjacent. Through this process reminiscence
takes place. For the movements are, in these cases, sometimes at the same time,
sometimes parts of the same whole, so that the subsequent movement is already
more than half accomplished.”
This remarkable paragraph of Aristotle is seen as the starting point of Associationism (Burnham, 1888). Associationism is a theory states that mind is a set of conceptual
elements that are organized as associations between these elements. Inspired by Plato,
Aristotle examined the processes of remembrance and recall and brought up with four laws
of association (Boeree, 2000).
• Contiguity: Things or events with spatial or temporal proximity tend to be associated
in the mind.
• Frequency: The number of occurrences of two events is proportional to the strength
of association between these two events.
• Similarity: Thought of one event tends to trigger the thought of a similar event.
• Contrast: Thought of one event tends to trigger the thought of an opposite event.
Back then, Aristotle described the implementation of these laws in our mind as common
sense. For example, the feel, the smell, or the taste of an apple should naturally lead to
the concept of an apple, as common sense. Nowadays, it is surprising to see that these
laws proposed more than 2000 years ago still serve as the fundamental assumptions of
machine learning methods. For example, samples that are near each other (under a defined
distance) are clustered into one group; explanatory variables that frequently occur with
response variables draw more attention from the model; similar/dissimilar data are usually
represented with more similar/dissimilar embeddings in latent space.
Contemporaneously, similar laws were also proposed by Zeno of Citium, Epicurus and
St Augustine of Hippo. The theory of associationism was later strengthened with a variety
of philosophers or psychologists. Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) stated that the complex
experiences were the association of simple experiences, which were associations of sensations.
He also believed that association exists by means of coherence and frequency as its strength
5
Wang and Raj
Figure 1: Illustration of neural groupings in (Bain, 1873)
factor. Meanwhile, John Locke (1632-1704) introduced the concept of “association of ideas”.
He still separated the concept of ideas of sensation and ideas of reflection and he stated
that complex ideas could be derived from a combination of these two simple ideas. David
Hume (1711-1776) later reduced Aristotle’s four laws into three: resemblance (similarity),
contiguity, and cause and effect. He believed that whatever coherence the world seemed to
have was a matter of these three laws. Dugald Stewart (1753-1828) extended these three
laws with several other principles, among an obvious one: accidental coincidence in the
sounds of words. Thomas Reid (1710-1796) believed that no original quality of mind was
required to explain the spontaneous recurrence of thinking, rather than habits. James Mill
(1773-1836) emphasized on the law of frequency as the key to learning, which is very similar
to later stages of research.
David Hartley (1705-1757), as a physician, was remarkably regarded as the one that
made associationism popular (Hartley, 2013). In addition to existing laws, he proposed his
argument that memory could be conceived as smaller scale vibrations in the same regions
of the brain as the original sensory experience. These vibrations can link up to represent
complex ideas and therefore act as a material basis for the stream of consciousness. This
idea potentially inspired Hebbian learning rule, which will be discussed later in this paper
to lay the foundation of neural networks.
2.2 Bain and Neural Groupings
Besides David Hartley, Alexander Bain (1818-1903) also contributed to the fundamental
ideas of Hebbian Learning Rule (Wilkes and Wade, 1997). In this book, Bain (1873) related
the processes of associative memory to the distribution of activity of neural groupings (a
term that he used to denote neural networks back then). He proposed a constructive mode
of storage capable of assembling what was required, in contrast to alternative traditional
mode of storage with prestored memories.
To further illustrate his ideas, Bain first described the computational flexibility that
allows a neural grouping to function when multiple associations are to be stored. With
a few hypothesis, Bain managed to describe a structure that highly resembled the neural
6
On the Origin of Deep Learning
networks of today: an individual cell is summarizing the stimulation from other selected
linked cells within a grouping, as showed in Figure 1. The joint stimulation from a and c
triggers X, stimulation from b and c triggers Y and stimulation from a and c triggers Z. In
his original illustration, a, b, c stand for simulations, X and Y are outcomes of cells.
With the establishment of how this associative structure of neural grouping can function
as memory, Bain proceeded to describe the construction of these structures. He followed the
directions of associationism and stated that relevant impressions of neural groupings must
be made in temporal contiguity for a period, either on one occasion or repeated occasions.
Further, Bain described the computational properties of neural grouping: connections
are strengthened or weakened through experience via changes of intervening cell-substance.
Therefore, the induction of these circuits would be selected comparatively strong or weak.
As we will see in the following section, Hebb’s postulate highly resembles Bain’s description, although nowadays we usually label this postulate as Hebb’s, rather than Bain’s,
according to (Wilkes and Wade, 1997). This omission of Bain’s contribution may also be
due to Bain’s lack of confidence in his own theory: Eventually, Bain was not convinced by
himself and doubted about the practical values of neural groupings.
2.3 Hebbian Learning Rule
Hebbian Learning Rule is named after Donald O. Hebb (1904-1985) since it was introduced
in his work The Organization of Behavior (Hebb, 1949). Hebb is also seen as the father of
Neural Networks because of this work (Didier and Bigand, 2011).
In 1949, Hebb stated the famous rule: “Cells that fire together, wire together”, which
emphasized on the activation behavior of co-fired cells. More specifically, in his book, he
stated that:
“When an axon of cell A is near enough to excite a cell B and repeatedly
or persistently takes part in firing it, some growth process or metabolic change
takes place in one or both cells such that As efficiency, as one of the cells firing
B, is increased.”
This archaic paragraph can be re-written into modern machine learning languages as the
following:
∆wi = ηxi y
(1)
where ∆wi stands for the change of synaptic weights (wi ) of Neuron i, of which the input
signal is xi . y denotes the postsynaptic response and η denotes learning rate. In other
words, Hebbian Learning Rule states that the connection between two units should be
strengthened as the frequency of co-occurrences of these two units increase.
Although Hebbian Learning Rule is seen as laying the foundation of neural networks,
seen today, its drawbacks are obvious: as co-occurrences appear more, the weights of connections keep increasing and the weights of a dominant signal will increase exponentially. This
is known as the unstableness of Hebbian Learning Rule (Principe et al., 1999). Fortunately,
these problems did not influence Hebb’s identity as the father of neural networks.
7
Wang and Raj
2.4 Oja’s Rule and Principal Component Analyzer
Erkki Oja extended Hebbian Learning Rule to avoid the unstableness property and he also
showed that a neuron, following this updating rule, is approximating the behavior of a
Principal Component Analyzer (PCA) (Oja, 1982).
Long story short, Oja introduced a normalization term to rescue Hebbian Learning
rule, and further he showed that his learning rule is simply an online update of Principal
Component Analyzer. We present the details of this argument in the following paragraphs.
Starting from Equation 1 and following the same notation, Oja showed:
wit+1 = wit + ηxi y
where t denotes the iteration. A straightforward way to avoid the exploding of weights is
to apply normalization at the end of each iteration, yielding:
wt + ηxi y
wit+1 = Pn i
1
( i=1 (wit + ηxi y)2 ) 2
where n denotes the number of neurons. The above equation can be further expanded into
the following form:
Pn
t
w
i
yx
w
j yxj wj
i
+
) + O(η 2 )
wit+1 = i + η(
Z
Z
Z3
P
1
where Z = ( ni wi2 ) 2 . Further, two more assumptions are introduced: 1) η is small.
P
1
Therefore O(η 2 ) is approximately 0. 2) Weights are normalized, therefore Z = ( ni wi2 ) 2 =
1.
When these two assumptions were introduced back to the previous equation, Oja’s rule
was proposed as following:
wit+1 = wit + ηy(xi − ywit )
(2)
Oja took a step further to show that a neuron that was updated with this rule was
effectively performing Principal Component Analysis on the data. To show this, Oja first
re-wrote Equation 2 as the following forms with two additional assumptions (Oja, 1982):
d t
w = Cwit − ((wit )T Cwit )wit
d(t) i
where C is the covariance matrix of input X. Then he proceeded to show this property
with many conclusions from his another work (Oja and Karhunen, 1985) and linked back
to PCA with the fact that components from PCA are eigenvectors and the first component
is the eigenvector corresponding to largest eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. Intuitively,
we could interpret this property with a simpler explanation: the eigenvectors of C are the
solution when we maximize the rule updating function. Since wit are the eigenvectors of the
covariance matrix of X, we can get that wit are the PCA.
Oja’s learning rule concludes our story of learning rules of the early-stage neural network.
Now we proceed to visit the ideas on neural models.
8
On the Origin of Deep Learning
2.5 MCP Neural Model
While Donald Hebb is seen as the father of neural networks, the first model of neuron
could trace back to six years ahead of the publication of Hebbian Learning Rule, when
a neurophysiologist Warren McCulloch and a mathematician Walter Pitts speculated the
inner workings of neurons and modeled a primitive neural network by electrical circuits
based on their findings (McCulloch and Pitts, 1943). Their model, known as MCP neural
model, was a linear step function upon weighted linearly interpolated data that could be
described as:
( P
1,
i wi xi ≥ θ AND zj = 0, ∀j
y=
0, otherwise
where y stands for output, xi stands for input of signals, wi stands for the corresponding
weights and zj stands for the inhibitory input. θ stands for the threshold. The function is
designed in a way that the activity of any inhibitory input completely prevents excitation
of the neuron at any time.
Despite the resemblance between MCP Neural Model and modern perceptron, they are
still different distinctly in many different aspects:
• MCP Neural Model is initially built as electrical circuits. Later we will see that the
study of neural networks has borrowed many ideas from the field of electrical circuits.
• The weights of MCP Neural Model wi are fixed, in contrast to the adjustable weights
in modern perceptron. All the weights must be assigned with manual calculation.
• The idea of inhibitory input is quite unconventional even seen today. It might be an
idea worth further study in modern deep learning research.
2.6 Perceptron
With the success of MCP Neural Model, Frank Rosenblatt further substantialized Hebbian
Learning Rule with the introduction of perceptrons (Rosenblatt, 1958). While theorists
like Hebb were focusing on the biological system in the natural environment, Rosenblatt
constructed the electronic device named Perceptron that was showed with the ability to
learn in accordance with associationism.
Rosenblatt (1958) introduced the perceptron with the context of the vision system, as
showed in Figure 2(a). He introduced the rules of the organization of a perceptron as
following:
• Stimuli impact on a retina of the sensory units, which respond in a manner that the
pulse amplitude or frequency is proportional to the stimulus intensity.
• Impulses are transmitted to Projection Area (AI ). This projection area is optional.
• Impulses are then transmitted to Association Area through random connections. If
the sum of impulse intensities is equal to or greater than the threshold (θ) of this unit,
then this unit fires.
9
Wang and Raj
(a) Illustration of organization of a perceptron in
(Rosenblatt, 1958)
(b) A typical perceptron in modern machine learning literature
Figure 2: Perceptrons: (a) A new figure of the illustration of organization of perceptron as
in (Rosenblatt, 1958). (b) A typical perceptron nowadays, when AI (Projection
Area) is omitted.
• Response units work in the same fashion as those intermediate units.
Figure 2(a) illustrates his explanation of perceptron. From left to right, the four units
are sensory unit, projection unit, association unit and response unit respectively. Projection
unit receives the information from sensory unit and passes onto association unit. This unit
is often omitted in other description of similar models. With the omission of projection
unit, the structure resembles the structure of nowadays perceptron in a neural network (as
showed in Figure 2(b)): sensory units collect data, association units linearly adds these data
with different weights and apply non-linear transform onto the thresholded sum, then pass
the results to response units.
One distinction between the early stage neuron models and modern perceptrons is the
introduction of non-linear activation functions (we use sigmoid function as an example
in Figure 2(b)). This originates from the argument that linear threshold function should
be softened to simulate biological neural networks (Bose et al., 1996) as well as from the
consideration of the feasibility of computation to replace step function with a continuous
one (Mitchell et al., 1997).
After Rosenblatt’s introduction of Perceptron, Widrow et al. (1960) introduced a followup model called ADALINE. However, the difference between Rosenblatt’s Perceptron and
ADALINE is mainly on the algorithm aspect. As the primary focus of this paper is neural
network models, we skip the discussion of ADALINE.
2.7 Perceptron’s Linear Representation Power
A perceptron is fundamentally a linear function of input signals; therefore it is limited to
represent linear decision boundaries like the logical operations like NOT, AND or OR, but
not XOR when a more sophisticated decision boundary is required. This limitation was
highlighted by Minski and Papert (1969), when they attacked the limitations of perceptions
by emphasizing that perceptrons cannot solve functions like XOR or NXOR. As a result,
very little research was done in this area until about the 1980s.
10
On the Origin of Deep Learning
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 3: The linear representation power of preceptron
To show a more concrete example, we introduce a linear preceptron with only two inputs
x1 and x2 , therefore, the decision boundary w1 x1 + w2 x2 forms a line in a two-dimensional
space. The choice of threshold magnitude shifts the line horizontally and the sign of the
function picks one side of the line as the halfspace the function represents. The halfspace
is showed in Figure 3 (a).
In Figure 3 (b)-(d), we present two nodes a and b to denote to input, as well as the node
to denote the situation when both of them trigger and a node to denote the situation when
neither of them triggers. Figure 3 (b) and Figure 3 (c) show clearly that a linear perceptron
can be used to describe AND and OR operation of these two inputs. However, in Figure 3
(d), when we are interested in XOR operation, the operation can no longer be described by
a single linear decision boundary.
In the next section, we will show that the representation ability is greatly enlarged when
we put perceptrons together to make a neural network. However, when we keep stacking
one neural network upon the other to make a deep learning model, the representation power
will not necessarily increase.
11
Wang and Raj
3. From Modern Neural Network to the Era of Deep Learning
In this section, we will introduce some important properties of neural networks. These
properties partially explain the popularity neural network gains these days and also motivate the necessity of exploring deeper architecture. To be specific, we will discuss a set of
universal approximation properties, in which each property has its condition. Then, we will
show that although a shallow neural network is an universal approximator, deeper architecture can significantly reduce the requirement of resources while retaining the representation
power. At last, we will also show some interesting properties discovered in the 1990s about
backpropagation, which may inspire some related research today.
3.1 Universal Approximation Property
The step from perceptrons to basic neural networks is only placing the perceptrons together.
By placing the perceptrons side by side, we get a single one-layer neural network and by
stacking one one-layer neural network upon the other, we get a multi-layer neural network,
which is often known as multi-layer perceptrons (MLP) (Kawaguchi, 2000).
One remarkable property of neural networks, widely known as universal approximation
property, roughly describes that an MLP can represent any functions. Here we discussed
this property in three different aspects:
• Boolean Approximation: an MLP of one hidden layer1 can represent any boolean
function exactly.
• Continuous Approximation: an MLP of one hidden layer can approximate any bounded
continuous function with arbitrary accuracy.
• Arbitrary Approximation: an MLP of two hidden layers can approximate any function
with arbitrary accuracy.
We will discuss these three properties in detail in the following paragraphs. To suit different
readers’ interest, we will first offer an intuitive explanation of these properties and then offer
the proofs.
3.1.1 Representation of any Boolean Functions
This approximation property is very straightforward. In the previous section we have shown
that every linear preceptron can perform either AND or OR. According to De Morgan’s
laws, every propositional formula can be converted into an equivalent Conjunctive Normal
Form, which is an OR of multiple AND functions. Therefore, we simply rewrite the target
Boolean function into an OR of multiple AND operations. Then we design the network in
such a way: the input layer performs all AND operations, and the hidden layer is simply
an OR operation.
The formal proof is not very different from this intuitive explanation, we skip it for
simplicity.
1. Through this paper, we will follow the most widely accepted naming convention that calls a two-layer
neural network as one hidden layer neural network.
12
On the Origin of Deep Learning
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 4: Example of Universal Approximation of any Bounded Continuous Functions
3.1.2 Approximation of any Bounded Continuous Functions
Continuing from the linear representation power of perceptron discussed previously, if we
want to represent a more complex function, showed in Figure 4 (a), we can use a set
of linear perceptrons, each of them describing a halfspace. One of these perceptrons is
shown in Figure 4 (b), we will need five of these perceptrons. With these perceptrons, we
can bound the target function out, as showed in Figure 4 (c). The numbers showed in
Figure 4 (c) represent the number of subspaces described by perceptrons that fall into the
corresponding region. As we can see, with an appropriate selection of the threshold (e.g.
θ = 5 in Figure 4 (c)), we can bound the target function out. Therefore, we can describe any
bounded continuous function with only one hidden layer; even it is a shape as complicated
as Figure 4 (d).
This property was first shown in (Cybenko, 1989) and (Hornik et al., 1989). To be
specific, Cybenko (1989) showed that, if we have a function in the following form:
X
f (x) =
ωi σ(wiT x + θ)
(3)
i
f (x) is dense in the subspace of where it is in. In other words, for an arbitrary function
g(x) in the same subspace as f (x), we have
|f (x) − g(x)| <
where > 0. In Equation 3, σ denotes the activation function (a squashing function back
then), wi denotes the weights for the input layer and ωi denotes the weights for the hidden
layer.
This conclusion was drawn with a proof by contradiction: With Hahn-Banach Theorem
and Riesz Representation Theorem, the fact that the closure of f (x) is not all the subspace
where f (x) is in contradicts the assumption that σ is an activation (squashing) function.
Till today, this property has drawn thousands of citations. Unfortunately, many of
the later works cite this property inappropriately (Castro et al., 2000) because Equation 3
is not the widely accepted form of a one-hidden-layer neural network because it does not
deliver a thresholded/squashed output, but a linear output instead. Ten years later after
this property was shown, Castro et al. (2000) concluded this story by showing that when
the final output is squashed, this universal approximation property still holds.
Note that, this property was shown with the context that activation functions are squashing functions. By definition, a squashing function σ : R → [0, 1] is a non-decreasing function
13
Wang and Raj
Figure 5: Threshold is not necessary with a large number of linear perceptrons.
with the properties limx→∞ σ(x) = 1 and limx→−∞ σ(x) = 0. Many activation functions of
recent deep learning research do not fall into this category.
3.1.3 Approximation of Arbitrary Functions
Before we move on to explain this property, we need first to show a major property regarding
combining linear perceptrons into neural networks. Figure 5 shows that as the number of
linear perceptrons increases to bound the target function, the area outside the polygon with
the sum close to the threshold shrinks. Following this trend, we can use a large number of
perceptrons to bound a circle, and this can be achieved even without knowing the threshold
because the area close to the threshold shrinks to nothing. What left outside the circle is,
in fact, the area that sums to N2 , where N is the number of perceptrons used.
Therefore, a neural network with one hidden layer can represent a circle with arbitrary
diameter. Further, we introduce another hidden layer that is used to combine the outputs of
many different circles. This newly added hidden layer is only used to perform OR operation.
Figure 6 shows an example that when the extra hidden layer is used to merge the circles
from the previous layer, the neural network can be used to approximate any function. The
target function is not necessarily continuous. However, each circle requires a large number
of neurons, consequently, the entire function requires even more.
This property was showed in (Lapedes and Farber, 1988) and (Cybenko, 1988) respectively. Looking back at this property today, it is not arduous to build the connections
between this property to Fourier series approximation, which, in informal words, states
that every function curve can be decomposed into the sum of many simpler curves. With
this linkage, to show this universal approximation property is to show that any one-hiddenlayer neural network can represent one simple surface, then the second hidden layer sums
up these simple surfaces to approximate an arbitrary function.
As we know, one hidden layer neural network simply performs a thresholded sum operation, therefore, the only step left is to show that the first hidden layer can represent a
simple surface. To understand the “simple surface”, with linkage to Fourier transform, one
can imagine one cycle of the sinusoid for the one-dimensional case or a “bump” of a plane
in the two-dimensional case.
14
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 6: How a neural network can be used to approximate a leaf shaped function.
For one dimension, to create a simple surface, we only need two sigmoid functions
appropriately placed, for example, as following:
f1 (x) =
f2 (x) =
h
1+
e−(x+t1 )
h
1 + ex−t2
Then, with f1 (x) + f2 (x), we create a simple surface with height 2h from t1 ≤ x ≤ t2 .
This could be easily generalized to n-dimensional case, where we need 2n sigmoid functions
(neurons) for each simple surface. Then for each simple surface that contributes to the final
function, one neuron is added onto the second hidden layer. Therefore, despite the number
of neurons need, one will never need a third hidden layer to approximate any function.
Similarly to how Gibbs phenomenon affects Fourier series approximation, this approximation cannot guarantee an exact representation.
The universal approximation properties showed a great potential of shallow neural networks at the price of exponentially many neurons at these layers. One followed-up question
is that how to reduce the number of required neurons while maintaining the representation
power. This question motivates people to proceed to deeper neural networks despite that
shallow neural networks already have infinite modeling power. Another issue worth attention is that, although neural networks can approximate any functions, it is not trivial to
find the set of parameters to explain the data. In the next two sections, we will discuss
these two questions respectively.
15
Wang and Raj
3.2 The Necessity of Depth
The universal approximation properties of shallow neural networks come at a price of exponentially many neurons and therefore are not realistic. The question about how to maintain
this expressive power of the network while reducing the number of computation units has
been asked for years. Intuitively, Bengio and Delalleau (2011) suggested that it is nature
to pursue deeper networks because 1) human neural system is a deep architecture (as we
will see examples in Section 5 about human visual cortex.) and 2) humans tend to represent concepts at one level of abstraction as the composition of concepts at lower levels.
Nowadays, the solution is to build deeper architectures, which comes from a conclusion that
states the representation power of a k layer neural network with polynomial many neurons
need to be expressed with exponentially many neurons if a k − 1 layer structured is used.
However, theoretically, this conclusion is still being completed.
This conclusion could trace back to three decades ago when Yao (1985) showed the
limitations of shallow circuits functions. Hastad (1986) later showed this property with
parity circuits: “there are functions computable in polynomial size and depth k but requires
exponential size when depth is restricted to k − 1”. He showed this property mainly by
the application of DeMorgan’s law, which states that any AND or ORs can be rewritten
as OR of ANDs and vice versa. Therefore, he simplified a circuit where ANDs and ORs
appear one after the other by rewriting one layer of ANDs into ORs and therefore merge
this operation to its neighboring layer of ORs. By repeating this procedure, he was able to
represent the same function with fewer layers, but more computations.
Moving from circuits to neural networks, Delalleau and Bengio (2011) compared deep
and shallow sum-product neural networks. They showed that a function√ that could be
expressed with O(n) neurons on a network of depth k required at least O(2 n ) and O((n −
1)k ) neurons on a two-layer neural network.
Further, Bianchini and Scarselli (2014) extended this study to a general neural network with many major activation functions including tanh and sigmoid. They derived
the conclusion with the concept of Betti numbers, and used this number to describe the
representation power of neural networks. They showed that for a shallow network, the representation power can only grow polynomially with respect to the number of neurons, but
for deep architecture, the representation can grow exponentially with respect to the number
of neurons. They also related their conclusion to VC-dimension of neural networks, which
is O(p2 ) for tanh (Bartlett and Maass, 2003) where p is the number of parameters.
Recently, Eldan and Shamir (2015) presented a more thorough proof to show that depth
of a neural network is exponentially more valuable than the width of a neural network, for a
standard MLP with any popular activation functions. Their conclusion is drawn with only a
few weak assumptions that constrain the activation functions to be mildly increasing, measurable, and able to allow shallow neural networks to approximate any univariate Lipschitz
function. Finally, we have a well-grounded theory to support the fact that deeper network
is preferred over shallow ones. However, in reality, many problems will arise if we keep
increasing the layers. Among them, the increased difficulty of learning proper parameters
is probably the most prominent one. Immediately in the next section, we will discuss the
main drive of searching parameters for a neural network: Backpropagation.
16
On the Origin of Deep Learning
3.3 Backpropagation and Its Properties
Before we proceed, we need to clarify that the name backpropagation, originally, is not
referring to an algorithm that is used to learn the parameters of a neural network, instead,
it stands for a technique that can help efficiently compute the gradient of parameters when
gradient descent algorithm is applied to learn parameters (Hecht-Nielsen, 1989). However,
nowadays it is widely recognized as the term to refer gradient descent algorithm with such
a technique.
Compared to a standard gradient descent, which updates all the parameters with respect to error, backpropagation first propagates the error term at output layer back to
the layer at which parameters need to be updated, then uses standard gradient descent
to update parameters with respect to the propagated error. Intuitively, the derivation of
backpropagation is about organizing the terms when the gradient is expressed with the
chain rule. The derivation is neat but skipped in this paper due to the extensive resources
available (Werbos, 1990; Mitchell et al., 1997; LeCun et al., 2015). Instead, we will discuss
two interesting and seemingly contradictory properties of backpropagation.
3.3.1 Backpropagation Finds Global Optimal for Linear Separable Data
Gori and Tesi (1992) studied on the problem of local minima in backpropagation. Interestingly, when the society believes that neural networks or deep learning approaches are
believed to suffer from local optimal, they proposed an architecture where global optimal
is guaranteed. Only a few weak assumptions of the network are needed to reach global
optimal, including
• Pyramidal Architecture: upper layers have fewer neurons
• Weight matrices are full row rank
• The number of input neurons cannot smaller than the classes/patterns of data.
However, their approaches may not be relevant anymore as they require the data to be
linearly separable, under which condition that many other models can be applied.
3.3.2 Backpropagation Fails for Linear Separable Data
On the other hand, Brady et al. (1989) studied the situations when backpropagation fails
on linearly separable data sets. He showed that there could be situations when the data
is linearly separable, but a neural network learned with backpropagation cannot find that
boundary. He also showed examples when this situation occurs.
His illustrative examples only hold when the misclassified data samples are significantly
less than correctly classified data samples, in other words, the misclassified data samples
might be just outliers. Therefore, this interesting property, when viewed today, is arguably
a desirable property of backpropagation as we typically expect a machine learning model
to neglect outliers. Therefore, this finding has not attracted many attentions.
However, no matter whether the data is an outlier or not, neural network should be
able to overfit training data given sufficient training iterations and a legitimate learning
algorithm, especially considering that Brady et al. (1989) showed that an inferior algorithm
17
Wang and Raj
was able to overfit the data. Therefore, this phenomenon should have played a critical role
in the research of improving the optimization techniques. Recently, the studying of cost
surfaces of neural networks have indicated the existence of saddle points (Choromanska
et al., 2015; Dauphin et al., 2014; Pascanu et al., 2014), which may explain the findings of
Brady et al back in the late 80s.
Backpropagation enables the optimization of deep neural networks. However, there is
still a long way to go before we can optimize it well. Later in Section 7, we will briefly
discuss more techniques related to the optimization of neural networks.
18
On the Origin of Deep Learning
4. The Network as Memory and Deep Belief Nets
Figure 7: Trade off of representation power and computation complexity of several models,
that guides the development of better models
With the background of how modern neural network is set up, we proceed to visit the
each prominent branch of current deep learning family. Our first stop is the branch that
leads to the popular Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Deep Belief Nets, and it starts as
a model to understand the data unsupervisedly.
Figure 7 summarizes the model that will be covered in this Section. The horizontal axis
stands for the computation complexity of these models while the vertical axis stands for the
representation power. The six milestones that will be focused in this section are placed in
the figure.
4.1 Self Organizing Map
The discussion starts with Self Organizing Map (SOM) invented by Kohonen (1990). SOM
is a powerful technique that is primarily used in reducing the dimension of data, usually
to one or two dimensions (Germano, 1999). While reducing the dimensionality, SOM also
retains the topological similarity of data points. It can also be seen as a tool for clustering
while imposing the topology on clustered representation. Figure 8 is an illustration of Self
Organizing Map of two dimension hidden neurons. Therefore, it learns a two dimension
representation of data. The upper shaded nodes denote the units of SOM that are used to
19
Wang and Raj
Figure 8: Illustration of Self-Organizing Map
represent data while the lower circles denote the data. There is no connection between the
nodes in SOM 2 .
The position of each node is fixed. The representation should not be viewed as only a
numerical value. Instead, the position of it also matters. This property is different from
some widely-accepted representation criterion. For example, we compare the case when
one-hot vector and one-dimension SOM are used to denote colors: To denote green out
of a set: C = {green, red, purple}, one-hot representation can use any vector of (1, 0, 0),
(0, 1, 0) or (0, 0, 1) as long as we specify the bit for green correspondingly. However, for a
one-dimensional SOM, only two vectors are possible: (1, 0, 0) or (0, 0, 1). This is because
that, since SOM aims to represent the data while retaining the similarity; and red and
purple are much more similar than green and red or green and purple, green should not be
represented in a way that it splits red and purple. One should notice that, this example is
only used to demonstrate that the position of each unit in SOM matters. In practice, the
values of SOM unit are not restricted to integers.
The learned SOM is usually a good tool for visualizing data. For example, if we conduct
a survey on the happiness level and richness level of each country and feed the data into
a two-dimensional SOM. Then the trained units should represent the happiest and richest
country at one corner and represent the opposite country at the furthest corner. The rest
two corners represent the richest, yet unhappiest and the poorest but happiest countries.
The rest countries are positioned accordingly. The advantage of SOM is that it allows one
2. In some other literature, (Bullinaria, 2004) as an example, one may notice that there are connections
in the illustrations of models. However, those connections are only used to represent the neighborhood
relationship of nodes, and there is no information flowing via those connections. In this paper, as we
will show many other models that rely on a clear illustration of information flow, we decide to save the
connections to denote that.
20
On the Origin of Deep Learning
to easily tell how a country is ranked among the world with a simple glance of the learned
units (Guthikonda, 2005).
4.1.1 Learning Algorithm
With an understanding of the representation power of SOM, now we proceed to its parameter learning algorithm. The classic algorithm is heuristic and intuitive, as shown below:
Here we use a two-dimensional SOM as example, and i, j are indexes of units; w is weight
Initialize weights of all units, wi,j ∀ i, j
for t ≤ N do
Pick vk randomly
Select Best Matching Unit (BMU) as p, q := arg mini,j ||wij − vk ||22
Select the nodes of interest as the neighbors of BMU. I = {wi,j |dist(wi,j , wp,q ) < r(t)}
Update weights: wi,j = wi,j + P (i, j, p, q)l(t)||wij − vk ||22 , ∀i, j ∈ I
end for
of the unit; v denotes data vector; k is the index of data; t denotes the current iteration; N
constrains the maximum number of steps allowed; P (·) denotes the penalty considering the
distance between unit p, q and unit i, j; l is learning rate; r denotes a radius used to select
neighbor nodes. Both l and r typically decrease as t increases. || · ||22 denotes Euclidean
distance and dist(·) denotes the distance on the position of units.
This algorithm explains how SOM can be used to learn a representation and how the
similarities are retained as it always selects a subset of units that are similar with the data
sampled and adjust the weights of units to match the data sampled.
However, this algorithm relies on a careful selection of the radius of neighbor selection
and a good initialization of weights. Otherwise, although the learned weights will have a
local property of topological similarity, it loses this property globally: sometimes, two similar
clusters of similar events are separated by another dissimilar cluster of similar events. In
simpler words, units of green may actually separate units of red and units of purple if the
network is not appropriately trained. (Germano, 1999).
4.2 Hopfield Network
Hopfield Network is historically described as a form of recurrent3 neural network, first
introduced in (Hopfield, 1982). “Recurrent” in this context refers to the fact that the
weights connecting the neurons are bidirectional. Hopfield Network is widely recognized
because of its content-addressable memory property. This content-addressable memory
property is a simulation of the spin glass theory. Therefore, we start the discussion from
spin glass.
3. The term “recurrent” is very confusing nowadays because of the popularity recurrent neural network
(RNN) gains.
21
Wang and Raj
Figure 9: Illustration of Hopfield Network. It is a fully connected network of six binary
thresholding neural units. Every unit is connected with data, therefore these
units are denoted as unshaded nodes.
4.2.1 Spin Glass
The spin glass is physics term that is used to describe a magnetic phenomenon. Many
works have been done for a detailed study of related theory (Edwards and Anderson, 1975;
Mézard et al., 1990), so in this paper, we only describe this it intuitively.
When a group of dipoles is placed together in any space. Each dipole is forced to align
itself with the field generated by these dipoles at its location. However, by aligning itself,
it changes the field at other locations, leading other dipoles to flip, causing the field in the
original location to change. Eventually, these changes will converge to a stable state.
To describe the stable state, we first define the total field at location j as
X sk
sj = oj + ct
d2jk
k
ct
where oj is an external field,
is a constant that depends on temperature t, sk is the
polarity of the kth dipole and djk is the distance from location j to location k. Therefore,
the total potential energy of the system is:
X
X sk
PE =
sj oj + ct sj
(4)
d2jk
j
k
The magnetic system will evolve until this potential energy is minimum.
4.2.2 Hopfield Network
Hopfield Network is a fully connected neural network with binary thresholding neural units.
The values of these units are either 0 or 14 . These units are fully connected with bidirectional
weights.
4. Some other literature may use -1 and 1 to denote the values of these units. While the choice of values
does not affect the idea of Hopfiled Network, it changes the formulation of energy function. In this paper,
we only discuss in the context of 0 and 1 as values.
22
On the Origin of Deep Learning
With this setting, the energy of a Hopfield Network is defined as:
X
X
E=−
si bi −
si sj wi,j
i
(5)
i,j
where s is the state of a unit, b denotes the bias; w denotes the bidirectional weights and i, j
are indexes of units. This energy function closely connects to the potential energy function
of spin glass, as showed in Equation 4.
Hopfield Network is typically applied to memorize the state of data. The weights of a
network are designed or learned to make sure that the energy is minimized given the state
of interest. Therefore, when another state presented to the network, while the weights are
fixed, Hopfield Network can search for the states that minimize the energy and recover the
state in memory. For example, in a face completion task, when some image of faces are
presented to Hopfield Network (in a way that each unit of the network corresponds to each
pixel of one image, and images are presented one after the other), the network can calculate
the weights to minimize the energy given these faces. Later, if one image is corrupted or
distorted and presented to this network again, the network is able to recover the original
image by searching a configuration of states to minimize the energy starting from corrupted
input presented.
The term “energy” may remind people of physics. To explain how Hopfield Network
works in a physics scenario will be clearer: nature uses Hopfield Network to memorize the
equilibrium position of a pendulum because, in an equilibrium position, the pendulum has
the lowest gravitational potential energy. Therefore, whenever a pendulum is placed, it will
converge back to the equilibrium position.
4.2.3 Learning and Inference
Learning of the weights of a Hopfield Network is straightforward (Gurney, 1997). The
weights can be calculated as:
X
wi,j =
(2si − 1)(2sj − 1)
i,j
the notations are the same as Equation 5.
This learning procedure is simple, but still worth mentioning as it is an essential step of
a Hopfield Network when it is applied to solve practical problems. However, we find that
many online tutorials omit this step, and to make it worse, they refer the inference of states
as learning/training. To remove the confusion, in this paper, similar to how terms are used
in standard machine learning society, we refer the calculation of weights of a model (either
from closed-form solution, or numerical solution) as “parameter learning” or “training”. We
refer the process of applying an existing model with weights known onto solving a real-world
problem as “inference”5 or “testing” (to decode a hidden state of data, e.g. to predict a
label).
The inference of Hopfield Network is also intuitive. For a state of data, the network
tests that if inverting the state of one unit, whether the energy will decrease. If so, the
5. “inference” is conventionally used in such a way in machine learning society, although some statisticians
may disagree with this usage.
23
Wang and Raj
network will invert the state and proceed to test the next unit. This procedure is called
Asynchronous update and this procedure is obviously subject to the sequential order of
selection of units. A counterpart is known as Synchronous update when the network first
tests for all the units and then inverts all the unit-to-invert simultaneously. Both of these
methods may lead to a local optimal. Synchronous update may even result in an increasing
of energy and may converge to an oscillation or loop of states.
4.2.4 Capacity
One distinct disadvantage of Hopfield Network is that it cannot keep the memory very
efficient because a network of N units can only store memory up to 0.15N 2 bits. While a
network with N units has N 2 edges. In addition, after storing M memories (M instances
of data), each connection has an integer value in range [−M, M ]. Thus, the number of bits
required to store N units are N 2 log(2M + 1) (Hopfield, 1982). Therefore, we can safely
draw the conclusion that although Hopfield Network is a remarkable idea that enables the
network to memorize data, it is extremely inefficient in practice.
As follow-ups of the invention of Hopfield Network, many works are attempted to study
and increase the capacity of original Hopfield Network (Storkey, 1997; Liou and Yuan,
1999; Liou and Lin, 2006). Despite these attempts made, Hopfield Network still gradually
fades out of the society. It is replaced by other models that are inspired by it. Immediately
following this section, we will discuss the popular Boltzmann Machine and Restricted Boltzmann Machine and study how these models are upgraded from the initial ideas of Hopfield
Network and evolve to replace it.
4.3 Boltzmann Machine
Boltzmann Machine, invented by Ackley et al. (1985), is a stochastic with-hidden-unit
version Hopfield Network. It got its name from Boltzmann Distribution.
4.3.1 Boltzmann Distribution
Boltzmann Distribution is named after Ludwig Boltzmann and investigated extensively by
(Willard, 1902). It is originally used to describe the probability distribution of particles in
a system over various possible states as following:
Es
F (s) ∝ e− kT
where s stands for the state and Es is the corresponding energy. k and T are Boltzmann’s
constant and thermodynamic temperature respectively. Naturally, the ratio of two distribution is only characterized by the difference of energies, as following:
r=
Es2 −Es1
F (s1 )
= e kT
F (s2 )
which is known as Boltzmann factor.
24
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 10: Illustration of Boltzmann Machine. With the introduction of hidden units
(shaded nodes), the model conceptually splits into two parts: visible units and
hidden units. The red dashed line is used to highlight the conceptual separation.
With how the distribution is specified by the energy, the probability is defined as the
term of each state divided by a normalizer, as following:
Esi
e− kT
psi =
P − Esj
kT
je
4.3.2 Boltzmann Machine
As we mentioned previously, Boltzmann Machine is a stochastic with-hidden-unit version
Hopfield Network. Figure 10 introduces how the idea of hidden units is introduced that
turns a Hopfield Network into a Boltzmann Machine. In a Boltzmann Machine, only visible
units are connected with data and hidden units are used to assist visible units to describe
the distribution of data. Therefore, the model conceptually splits into the visible part and
hidden part, while it still maintains a fully connected network among these units.
“Stochastic” is introduced for Boltzmann Machine to be improved from Hopfield Network regarding leaping out of the local optimum or oscillation of states. Inspired by physics,
a method to transfer state regardless current energy is introduced: Set a state to State 1
(which means the state is on) regardless of the current state with the following probability:
1
p=
∆E
1 + e− T
where ∆E stands for the difference of energies when the state is on and off, i.e. ∆E =
Es=1 − Es=0 . T stands for the temperature. The idea of T is inspired by a physics process
that the higher the temperature is, the more likely the state will transfer6 . In addition,
the probability of higher energy state transferring to lower energy state will be always
greater than the reverse process7 . This idea is highly related to a very popular optimization
6. Molecules move faster when more kinetic energy is provided, which could be achieved by heating.
7. This corresponds to Zeroth Law of Thermodynamics.
25
Wang and Raj
algorithm called Simulated Annealing (Khachaturyan et al., 1979; Aarts and Korst, 1988)
back then, but Simulated Annealing is hardly relevant to nowadays deep learning society.
Regardless of the historical importance that the term T introduces, within this section, we
will assume T = 1 as a constant, for the sake of simplification.
4.3.3 Energy of Boltzmann Machine
The energy function of Boltzmann Machine is defined the same as how Equation 5 is defined
for Hopfield Network, except that now visible units and hidden units are noted separately,
as following:
X
X
X
X
X
E(v, h) = −
vi bi −
hk bk −
vi vj wij −
vi hk wik −
hk hl wk,l
i
k
i,j
i,k
k,l
where v stands for visible units, h stands for hidden units. This equation also connects
back to Equation 4, except that Boltzmann Machine splits the energy function according
to hidden units and visible units.
Based on this energy function, the probability of a joint configuration over both visible
unit the hidden unit can be defined as following:
p(v, h) = P
e−E(v,h)
−E(m,n)
m,n e
The probability of visible/hidden units can be achieved by marginalizing this joint probability.
For example, by marginalizing out hidden units, we can get the probability distribution
of visible units:
P −E(v,h)
e
p(v) = P h −E(m,n)
m,n e
which could be used to sample visible units, i.e. generating data.
When Boltzmann Machine is trained to its stable state, which is called thermal equilibrium, the distribution of these probabilities p(v, h) will remain constant because the
distribution of energy will be a constant. However, the probability for each visible unit or
hidden unit may vary and the energy may not be at their minimum. This is related to how
thermal equilibrium is defined, where the only constant factor is the distribution of each
part of the system.
Thermal equilibrium can be a hard concept to understand. One can imagine that
pouring a cup of hot water into a bottle and then pouring a cup of cold water onto the
hot water. At start, the bottle feels hot at bottom and feels cold at top and gradually the
bottle feels mild as the cold water and hot water mix and heat is transferred. However, the
temperature of the bottle becomes mild stably (corresponding to the distribution of p(v, h))
does not necessarily mean that the molecules cease to move (corresponding to each p(v, h)).
4.3.4 Parameter Learning
The common way to train the Boltzmann machine is to determine the parameters that
maximize the likelihood of the observed data. Gradient descent on the log of the likelihood
26
On the Origin of Deep Learning
function is usually performed to determine the parameters. For simplicity, the following
derivation is based on a single observation.
First, we have the log likelihood function of visible units as
X
X
l(v; w) = log p(v; w) = log
e−Ev,h − log
e−Em,n
m,n
h
where the second term on RHS is the normalizer.
Now we take the derivative of log likelihood function w.r.t w, and simplify it, we have:
X
∂l(v; w)
∂E(m, n)
∂E(v, h) X
p(m, n)
=−
p(h|v)
+
∂w
∂w
∂w
m,n
h
∂E(v, h)
∂E(m, n)
+ Ep(m,n)
∂w
∂w
where E denotes expectation. Thus the gradient of the likelihood function is composed of
two parts. The first part is expected gradient of the energy function with respect to the
conditional distribution p(h|v). The second part is expected gradient of the energy function
with respect to the joint distribution over all variable states. However, calculating these
expectations is generally infeasible for any realistically-sized model, as it involves summing
over a huge number of possible states/configurations. The general approach for solving this
problem is to use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to approximate these sums:
= − Ep(h|v)
∂l(v; w)
= − < si , sj >p(hdata |vdata ) + < si , sj >p(hmodel |vmodel )
(6)
∂w
where < · > denotes expectation.
Equation 6 is the difference between the expectation value of product of states while the
data is fed into visible states and the expectation of product of states while no data is fed.
The first term is calculated by taking the average value of the energy function gradient when
the visible and hidden units are being driven by observed data samples. In practice, this
first term is generally straightforward to calculate. Calculating the second term is generally
more complicated and involves running a set of Markov chains until they reach the current
models equilibrium distribution, then taking the average energy function gradient based on
those samples.
However, this sampling procedure could be very computationally complicated, which
motivates the topic in next section, the Restricted Boltzmann Machine.
4.4 Restricted Boltzmann Machine
Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), originally known as Harmonium when invented by
Smolensky (1986), is a version of Boltzmann Machine with a restriction that there is no
connections either between visible units or between hidden units.
Figure 11 is an illustration of how Restricted Boltzmann Machine is achieved based
on Boltzmann Machine (Figure 10): the connections between hidden units, as well as the
connections between visible units are removed and the model becomes a bipartite graph.
With this restriction introduced, the energy function of RBM is much simpler:
X
X
X
E(v, h) = −
vi bi −
hk bk −
vi hk wik
(7)
i
k
27
i,k
Wang and Raj
Figure 11: Illustration of Restricted Boltzmann Machine. With the restriction that there is
no connections between hidden units (shaded nodes) and no connections between
visible units (unshaded nodes), the Boltzmann Machine turns into a Restricted
Boltzmann Machine. The model now is a a bipartite graph.
4.4.1 Contrastive Divergence
RBM can still be trained in the same way as how Boltzmann Machine is trained. Since the
energy function of RBM is much simpler, the sampling method used to infer the second
term in Equation 6 becomes easier. Despite this relative simplicity, this learning procedure
still requires a large amount of sampling steps to approximate the model distribution.
To emphasize the difficulties of such a sampling mechanism, as well as to simplify followup introduction, we re-write Equation 6 with a different set of notations, as following:
∂l(v; w)
= − < si , sj >p0 + < si , sj >p∞
∂w
(8)
here we use p0 to denote data distribution and p∞ to denote model distribution. Other
notations remain unchanged. Therefore, the difficulty of mentioned methods to learn the
parameters is that it requires potentially “infinitely” many sampling steps to approximate
the model distribution.
Hinton (2002) overcame this issue magically, with the introduction of a method named
Contrastive Divergence. Empirically, he found that one does not have to perform “infinitely”
many sampling steps to converge to the model distribution, a finite k steps of sampling is
enough. Therefore, Equation 8 is effectively re-written into:
∂l(v; w)
= − < si , sj >p0 + < si , sj >pk
∂w
Remarkably, Hinton (2002) showed that k = 1 is sufficient for the learning algorithm to
work well in practice.
Carreira-Perpinan and Hinton (2005) attempted to justify Contrastive Divergence in
theory, but their derivation led to a negative conclusion that Contrastive Divergence is a
28
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 12: Illustration of Deep Belief Networks. Deep Belief Networks is not just stacking
RBM together. The bottom layers (layers except the top one) do not have the
bi-directional connections, but only connections top down.
biased algorithm, and a finite k cannot represent the model distribution. However, their
empirical results suggested that finite k can approximate the model distribution well enough,
resulting a small enough bias. In addition, the algorithm works well in practice, which
strengthened the idea of Contrastive Divergence.
With the reasonable modeling power and a fast approximation algorithm, RBM quickly
draws great attention and becomes one of the most fundamental building blocks of deep
neural networks. In the following two sections, we will introduce two distinguished deep
neural networks that are built based on RBM/Boltzmann Machine, namely Deep Belief
Nets and Deep Boltzmann Machine.
4.5 Deep Belief Nets
Deep Belief Networks is introduced by Hinton et al. (2006)8 , when he showed that RBMs
can be stacked and trained in a greedy manner.
Figure 12 shows the structure of a three-layer Deep Belief Networks. Different from
stacking RBM, DBN only allows bi-directional connections (RBM-type connections) on the
top one layer while the following bottom layers only have top-down connections. Probably
a better way to understand DBN is to think it as multi-layer generative models. Despite the
fact that DBN is generally described as a stacked RBM, it is quite different from putting
one RBM on the top of the other. It is probably more appropriate to think DBN as a
one-layer RBM with extended layers specially devoted to generating patterns of data.
Therefore, the model only needs to sample for the thermal equilibrium at the topmost
layer and then pass the visible states top down to generate the data.
8. This paper is generally seen as the opening of nowadays Deep Learning era, as it first introduces the
possibility of training a deep neural network by layerwise training
29
Wang and Raj
4.5.1 Parameter Learning
Parameter learning of a Deep Belief Network falls into two steps: the first step is layer-wise
pre-training and the second step is fine-tuning.
Layerwise Pre-training The success of Deep Belief Network is largely due to the introduction of the layer-wised pretraining. The idea is simple, but the reason why it works
still attracts researchers. The pre-training is simply to first train the network component
by component bottom up: treating the first two layers as an RBM and train it, then treat
the second layer and third layer as another RBM and train for the parameters.
Such an idea turns out to offer a critical support of the success of the later finetuning process. Several explanations have been attempted to explain the mechanism of
pre-training:
• Intuitively, pre-training is a clever way of initialization. It puts the parameter values
in the appropriate range for further fine-tuning.
• Bengio et al. (2007) suggested that unsupervised pre-training initializes the model to
a point in parameter space which leads to a more effective optimization process, that
the optimization can find a lower minimum of the empirical cost function.
• Erhan et al. (2010) empirically argued for a regularization explanation, that unsupervised pretraining guides the learning towards basins of attraction of minima that
support better generalization from the training data set.
In addition to Deep Belief Networks, this pretraining mechanism also inspires the pretraining for many other classical models, including the autoencoders (Poultney et al., 2006;
Bengio et al., 2007), Deep Boltzmann Machines (Salakhutdinov and Hinton, 2009) and some
models inspired by these classical models like (Yu et al., 2010).
After the pre-training is performed, fine-tuning is carried out to further optimize the network to search for the parameters that lead to a lower minimum. For Deep Belief Networks,
there are two different fine tuning strategies dependent on the goals of the network.
Fine Tuning for Generative Model Fine-tuning for a generative model is achieved
with a contrastive version of wake-sleep algorithm (Hinton et al., 1995). This algorithm is
intriguing for the reason that it is designed to interpret how the brain works. Scientists have
found that sleeping is a critical process of brain function and it seems to be an inverse version
of how we learn when we are awake. The wake-sleep algorithm also has two steps. In wake
phase, we propagate information bottom up to adjust top-down weights for reconstructing
the layer below. Sleep phase is the inverse of wake phase. We propagate the information
top down to adjust bottom-up weights for reconstructing the layer above.
The contrastive version of this wake-sleep algorithm is that we add one Contrastive
Divergence phase between wake phase and sleep phase. The wake phase only goes up to the
visible layer of the top RBM, then we sample the top RBM with Contrastive Divergence,
then a sleep phase starts from the visible layer of top RBM.
Fine Tuning for Discriminative Model The strategy for fine tuning a DBN as a
discriminative model is to simply apply standard backpropagation to pre-trained model
30
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 13: Illustration of Deep Boltzmann Machine. Deep Boltzmann Machine is more like
stacking RBM together. Connections between every two layers are bidirectional.
since we have labels of data. However, pre-training is still necessary in spite of the generally
good performance of backpropagation.
4.6 Deep Boltzmann Machine
The last milestone we introduce in the family of deep generative model is Deep Boltzmann
Machine introduced by Salakhutdinov and Hinton (2009).
Figure 13 shows a three layer Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM). The distinction between DBM and DBN mentioned in the previous section is that DBM allows bidirectional
connections in the bottom layers. Therefore, DBM represents the idea of stacking RBMs
in a much better way than DBN, although it might be clearer if DBM is named as Deep
Restricted Boltzmann Machine.
Due to the nature of DBM, its energy function is defined as an extension of the energy
function of an RBM (Equation 7), as showed in the following:
E(v, h) = −
X
i
vi bi −
N X
X
hn,k bn,k −
n=1 k
X
i,k
vi wik hk −
N
−1 X
X
hn,k wn,k,l hn+1,l
n=1 k,l
for a DBM with N hidden layers.
This similarity of energy function grants the possibility of training DBM with constrative
divergence. However, pre-training is typically necessary.
4.6.1 Deep Boltzmann Machine (DBM) v.s. Deep Belief Networks (DBN)
As their acronyms suggest, Deep Boltzmann Machine and Deep Belief Networks have many
similarities, especially from the first glance. Both of them are deep neural networks originates from the idea of Restricted Boltzmann Machine. (The name “Deep Belief Network”
31
Wang and Raj
seems to indicate that it also partially originates from Bayesian Network (Krieg, 2001).)
Both of them also rely on layerwise pre-training for a success of parameter learning.
However, the fundamental differences between these two models are dramatic, introduced by how the connections are made between bottom layers (un-directed/bi-directed
v.s. directed). The bidirectional structure of DBM grants the possibility of DBM to learn
a more complex pattern of data. It also grants the possibility for the approximate inference
procedure to incorporate top-down feedback in addition to an initial bottom-up pass, allowing Deep Boltzmann Machines to better propagate uncertainty about ambiguous inputs.
4.7 Deep Generative Models: Now and the Future
Deep Boltzmann Machine is the last milestone we discuss in the history of generative models,
but there are still much work after DBM and even more to be done in the future.
Lake et al. (2015) introduces a Bayesian Program Learning framework that can simulate
human learning abilities with large scale visual concepts. In addition to its performance on
one-shot learning classification task, their model passes the visual Turing Test in terms of
generating handwritten characters from the worlds alphabets. In other words, the generative
performance of their model is indistinguishable from human’s behavior. Being not a deep
neural model itself, their model outperforms several concurrent deep neural networks. Deep
neural counterpart of the Bayesian Program Learning framework can be surely expected
with even better performance.
Conditional image generation (given part of the image) is also another interesting topic
recently. The problem is usually solved by Pixel Networks (Pixel CNN (van den Oord et al.,
2016) and Pixel RNN (Oord et al., 2016)). However, given a part of the image seems to
simplify the generation task.
Another contribution to generative models is Generative Adversarial Network (Goodfellow et al., 2014), however, GAN is still too young to be discussed in this paper.
32
On the Origin of Deep Learning
5. Convolutional Neural Networks and Vision Problems
In this section, we will start to discuss a different family of models: the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) family. Distinct from the family in the previous section, Convolutional
Neural Network family mainly evolves from the knowledge of human visual cortex. Therefore, in this section, we will first introduce one of the most important reasons that account
for the success of convolutional neural networks in vision problems: its bionic design to
replicate human vision system. The nowadays convolutional neural networks probably originate more from the such a design rather than from the early-stage ancestors. With these
background set-up, we will then briefly introduce the successful models that make themselves famous through the ImageNet Challenge (Deng et al., 2009). At last, we will present
some known problems of the vision task that may guide the future research directions in
vision tasks.
5.1 Visual Cortex
Convolutional Neural Network is widely known as being inspired by visual cortex, however,
except that some publications discuss this inspiration briefly (Poggio and Serre, 2013; Cox
and Dean, 2014), few resources present this inspiration thoroughly. In this section, we focus
on the discussion about basics on visual cortex (Hubel and Wiesel, 1959), which lays the
ground for further study in Convolutional Neural Networks.
The visual cortex of the brain, located in the occipital lobe which is located at the back
of the skull, is a part of the cerebral cortex that plays an important role in processing
visual information. Visual information coming from the eye, goes through a series of brain
structures and reaches the visual cortex. The parts of the visual cortex that receive the
sensory inputs is known as the primary visual cortex, also known as area V1. Visual
information is further managed by extrastriate areas, including visual areas two (V2) and
four (V4). There are also other visual areas (V3, V5, and V6), but in this paper, we
primarily focus on the visual areas that are related to object recognition, which is known
as ventral stream and consists of areas V1, V2, V4 and inferior temporal gyrus, which
is one of the higher levels of the ventral stream of visual processing, associated with the
representation of complex object features, such as global shape, like face perception (Haxby
et al., 2000).
Figure 14 is an illustration of the ventral stream of the visual cortex. It shows the
information process procedure from the retina which receives the image information and
passes all the way to inferior temporal gyrus. For each component:
• Retina converts the light energy that comes from the rays bouncing off of an object
into chemical energy. This chemical energy is then converted into action potentials
that are transferred onto primary visual cortex. (In fact, there are several other
brain structures involved between retina and V1, but we omit these structures for
simplicity9 .)
9. We deliberately discuss the components that have connections with established technologies in convolutional neural network, one who is interested in developing more powerful models is encouraged to
investigate other components.
33
Wang and Raj
Figure 14: A brief illustration of ventral stream of the visual cortex in human vision system.
It consists of primary visual cortex (V1), visual areas (V2 and V4) and inferior
temporal gyrus.
• Primary visual cortex (V1) mainly fulfills the task of edge detection, where an edge
is an area with strongest local contrast in the visual signals.
• V2, also known as secondary visual cortex, is the first region within the visual association area. It receives strong feedforward connections from V1 and sends strong
connections to later areas. In V2, cells are tuned to extract mainly simple properties
of the visual signals such as orientation, spatial frequency, and colour, and a few more
complex properties.
• V4 fulfills the functions including detecting object features of intermediate complexity,
like simple geometric shapes, in addition to orientation, spatial frequency, and color.
V4 is also shown with strong attentional modulation (Moran and Desimone, 1985).
V4 also receives direct input from V1.
• Inferior temporal gyrus (TI) is responsible for identifying the object based on the color
and form of the object and comparing that processed information to stored memories
of objects to identify that object (Kolb et al., 2014). In other words, IT performs the
semantic level tasks, like face recognition.
Many of the descriptions of functions about visual cortex should revive a recollection
of convolutional neural networks for the readers that have been exposed to some relevant
technical literature. Later in this section, we will discuss more details about convolutional
neural networks, which will help build explicit connections. Even for readers that barely
34
On the Origin of Deep Learning
have knowledge in convolutional neural networks, this hierarchical structure of visual cortex
should immediately ring a bell about neural networks.
Besides convolutional neural networks, visual cortex has been inspiring the works in
computer vision for a long time. For example, Li (1998) built a neural model inspired
by the primary visual cortex (V1). In another granularity, Serre et al. (2005) introduced
a system with feature detections inspired from the visual cortex. De Ladurantaye et al.
(2012) published a book describing the models of information processing in the visual cortex.
Poggio and Serre (2013) conducted a more comprehensive survey on the relevant topic, but
they didn’t focus on any particular subject in detail in their survey. In this section, we
discuss the connections between visual cortex and convolutional neural networks in details.
We will begin with Neocogitron, which borrows some ideas from visual cortex and later
inspires convolutional neural network.
5.2 Neocogitron and Visual Cortex
Neocogitron, proposed by Fukushima (1980), is generally seen as the model that inspires
Convolutional Neural Networks on the computation side. It is a neural network that consists of two different kinds of layers (S-layer as feature extractor and C-layer as structured
connections to organize the extracted features.)
S-layer consists of a number of S-cells that are inspired by the cell in primary visual
cortex. It serves as a feature extractor. Each S-cell can be ideally trained to be responsive
to a particular feature presented in its receptive field. Generally, local features such as edges
in particular orientations are extracted in lower layers while global features are extracted
in higher layers. This structure highly resembles how human conceive objects. C-layer
resembles complex cell in the higher pathway of visual cortex. It is mainly introduced for
shift invariant property of features extracted by S-layer.
5.2.1 Parameter Learning
During parameter learning process, only the parameters of S-layer are updated. Neocogitron can also be trained unsupervisedly, for a good feature extractor out of S-layers. The
training process for S-layer is very similar to Hebbian Learning rule, which strengthens the
connections between S-layer and C-layer for whichever S-cell shows the strongest response.
This training mechanism also introduces the problem Hebbian Learning rule introduces,
that the strength of connections will saturate (since it keeps increasing). The solution was
also introduced by Fukushima (1980), which was introduced with the name “inhibitory
cell”. It performed the function as a normalization to avoid the problem.
5.3 Convolutional Neural Network and Visual Cortex
Now we proceed from Neocogitron to Convolutional Neural Network. First, we will introduce the building components: convolutional layer and subsampling layer. Then we
assemble these components to present Convolutional Neural Network, using LeNet as an
example.
35
Wang and Raj
Figure 15: A simple illustration of two dimension convolution operation.
5.3.1 Convolution Operation
Convolution operation is strictly just a mathematical operation, which should be treated
equally with other operations like addition or multiplication and should not be discussed
particularly in a machine learning literature. However, we still discuss it here for completeness and for the readers who may not be familiar with it.
Convolution is a mathematical operation on two functions (e.g. f and g) and produces
a third function h, which is an integral that expresses the amount of overlap of one function
(f ) as it is shifted over the other function (g). It is described formally as the following:
Z ∞
f (τ )g(t − τ )dτ
h(t) =
−∞
and denoted as h = f ? g.
Convolutional neural network typically works with two-dimensional convolution operation, which could be summarized in Figure 15.
As showed in Figure 15, the leftmost matrix is the input matrix. The middle one is
usually called a kernel matrix. Convolution is applied to these matrices and the result
is showed as the rightmost matrix. The convolution process is an element-wise product
followed by a sum, as showed in the example. When the left upper 3×3 matrix is convoluted
with the kernel, the result is 29. Then we slide the target 3 × 3 matrix one column right,
convoluted with the kernel and get the result 12. We keep sliding and record the results as
a matrix. Because the kernel is 3 × 3, every target matrix is 3 × 3, thus, every 3 × 3 matrix
is convoluted to one digit and the whole 5 × 5 matrix is shrunk into 3 × 3 matrix. (Because
5 − (3 − 1) = 3. The first 3 means the size of the kernel matrix. )
One should realize that convolution is locally shift invariant, which means that for many
different combinations of how the nine numbers in the upper 3 × 3 matrix are placed, the
convoluted result will be 29. This invariant property plays a critical role in vision problem
because that in an ideal case, the recognition result should not be changed due to shift or
rotation of features. This critical property is used to be solved elegantly by Lowe (1999);
Bay et al. (2006), but convolutional neural network brought the performance up to a new
level.
5.3.2 Connection between CNN and Visual Cortex
With the ideas about two dimension convolution, we further discuss how convolution is a
useful operation that can simulate the tasks performed by visual cortex.
36
On the Origin of Deep Learning
(a) Identity kernel
(b) Edge detection kernel
(c) Blur kernel
(d) Sharpen kernel
(e) Lighten kernel
(f) Darken kernel
(g) Random kernel 1
(h) Random kernel 2
Figure 16: Convolutional kernels example. Different kernels applied to the same image will
result in differently processed images. Note that there is a 91 divisor applied to
these kernels.
The convolution operation is usually known as kernels. By different choices of kernels,
different operations of the images could be achieved. Operations are typically including
identity, edge detection, blur, sharpening etc. By introducing random matrices as convolution operator, some interesting properties might be discovered.
Figure 16 is an illustration of some example kernels that are applied to the same figure.
One can see that different kernels can be applied to fulfill different tasks. Random kernels
can also be applied to transform the image into some interesting outcomes.
Figure 16 (b) shows that edge detection, which is one of the central tasks of primary
visual cortex, can be fulfilled by a clever choice of kernels. Furthermore, clever selection
of kernels can lead us to a success replication of visual cortex. As a result, learning a
meaningful convolutional kernel (i.e. parameter learning) is one of the central tasks in
convolutional neural networks when applied to vision tasks. This also explains that why
37
Wang and Raj
Figure 17: An illustration of LeNet, where Conv stands for convolutional layer and Sampling stands for SubSampling Layer.
many well-trained popular models can usually perform well in other tasks with only limited
fine-tuning process: the kernels have been well trained and can be universally applicable.
With the understanding of the essential role convolution operation plays in vision tasks,
we proceed to investigate some major milestones along the way.
5.4 The Pioneer of Convolutional Neural Networks: LeNet
This section is devoted to a model that is widely recognized as the first convolutional neural
network: LeNet, invented by Le Cun et al. (1990) (further made popular with (LeCun et al.,
1998a)). It is inspired from the Neocogitron. In this section, we will introduce convolutional
neural network via introducing LeNet.
Figure 17 shows an illustration of the architecture of LeNet. It consists of two pairs of
Convolutional Layer and Subsampling Layer and is further connected with fully connected
layer and an RBF layer for classification.
5.4.1 Convolutional Layer
A convolutional layer is primarily a layer that performs convolution operation. As we have
discussed previously, a clever selection of convolution kernel can effectively simulate the
task of visual cortex. Convolutional layer introduces another operation after convolution to
assist the simulation to be more successful: the non-linearity transform.
Considering a ReLU (Nair and Hinton, 2010) non-linearity transform, which is defined
as following:
f (x) = max(0, x)
which is a transform that removes the negative part of the input, resulting in a clearer
contrast of meaningful features as opposed to other side product the kernel produces.
Therefore, this non-linearity grants the convolution more power in extracting useful
features and allows it to simulate the functions of visual cortex more closely.
38
On the Origin of Deep Learning
5.4.2 Subsampling Layer
Subsampling Layer performs a simpler task. It only samples one input out every region
it looks into. Some different strategies of sampling can be considered, like max-pooling
(taking the maximum value of the input), average-pooling (taking the averaged value of
input) or even probabilistic pooling (taking a random one.) (Lee et al., 2009).
Sampling turns the input representations into smaller and more manageable embeddings.
More importantly, sampling makes the network invariant to small transformations, distortions, and translations in the input image. A small distortion in the input will not change
the outcome of pooling since we take the maximum/average value in a local neighborhood.
5.4.3 LeNet
With the two most important components introduced, we can stack them together to assemble a convolutional neural network. Following the recipe of Figure 17, we will end up
with the famous LeNet.
LeNet is known as its ability to classify digits and can handle a variety of different
problems of digits including variances in position and scale, rotation and squeezing of digits,
and even different stroke width of the digit. Meanwhile, with the introduction of LeNet,
LeCun et al. (1998b) also introduces the MNIST database, which later becomes the standard
benchmark in digit recognition field.
5.5 Milestones in ImageNet Challenge
With the success of LeNet, Convolutional Neural Network has been shown with great potential in solving vision tasks. These potentials have attracted a large number of researchers
aiming to solve vision task regarding object recognition in CIFAR classification (Krizhevsky
and Hinton, 2009) and ImageNet challenge (Russakovsky et al., 2015). Along with this path,
several superstar milestones have attracted great attentions and has been applied to other
fields with good performance. In this section, we will briefly discuss these models.
5.5.1 AlexNet
While LeNet is the one that starts the era of convolutional neural networks, AlexNet,
invented by Krizhevsky et al. (2012), is the one that starts the era of CNN used for ImageNet
classification. AlexNet is the first evidence that CNN can perform well on this historically
difficult ImageNet dataset and it performs so well that leads the society into a competition
of developing CNNs.
The success of AlexNet is not only due to this unique design of architecture but also
due to the clever mechanism of training. To avoid the computationally expensive training
process, AlexNet has been split into two streams and trained on two GPUs. It also used
data augmentation techniques that consist of image translations, horizontal reflections, and
patch extractions.
The recipe of AlexNet is shown in Figure 18. However, rarely any lessons can be
learned from the architecture of AlexNet despite its remarkable performance. Even more
unfortunately, the fact that this particular architecture of AlexNet does not have a wellgrounded theoretical support pushes many researchers to blindly burn computing resources
39
Wang and Raj
Figure 18: An illustration of AlexNet
to test for a new architecture. Many models have been introduced during this period, but
only a few may be worth mentioning in the future.
5.5.2 VGG
In the blind competition of exploring different architectures, Simonyan and Zisserman (2014)
showed that simplicity is a promising direction with a model named VGG. Although VGG
is deeper (19 layer) than other models around that time, the architecture is extremely
simplified: all the layers are 3 × 3 convolutional layer with a 2 × 2 pooling layer. This
simple usage of convolutional layer simulates a larger filter while keeping the benefits of
smaller filter sizes, because the combination of two 3×3 convolutional layers has an effective
receptive field of a 5 × 5 convolutional layer, but with fewer parameters.
The spatial size of the input volumes at each layer will decrease as a result of the
convolutional and pooling layers, but the depth of the volumes increases because of the
increased number of filters (in VGG, the number of filters doubles after each pooling layer).
This behavior reinforces the idea of VGG to shrink spatial dimensions, but grow depth.
VGG is not the winner of the ImageNet competition of that year (The winner is
GoogLeNet invented by Szegedy et al. (2015)). GoogLeNet introduced several important
concepts like Inception module and the concept later used by R-CNN (Girshick et al., 2014;
Girshick, 2015; Ren et al., 2015), but the arbitrary/creative design of architecture barely
contribute more than what VGG does to the society, especially considering that Residual
Net, following the path of VGG, won the ImageNet challenge in an unprecedented level.
5.5.3 Residual Net
Residual Net (ResNet) is a 152 layer network, which was ten times deeper than what was
usually seen during the time when it was invented by He et al. (2015). Following the path
VGG introduces, ResNet explores deeper structure with simple layer. However, naively
40
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 19: An illustration of Residual Block of ResNet
increasing the number of layers will only result in worse results, for both training cases and
testing cases (He et al., 2015).
The breakthrough ResNet introduces, which allows ResNet to be substantially deeper
than previous networks, is called Residual Block. The idea behind a Residual Block is
that some input of a certain layer (denoted as x) can be passed to the component two
layers later either following the traditional path which involves convolutional layers and
ReLU transform succession (we denote the result as f (x)), or going through an express way
that directly passes x there. As a result, the input to the component two layers later is
f (x) + x instead of what is typically seen as f (x). The idea of Residual Block is illustrated
in Figure 19.
In a complementary work, He et al. (2016) validated that residual blocks are essential
for propagating information smoothly, therefore simplifies the optimization. They also
extended the ResNet to a 1000-layer version with success on CIFAR data set.
Another interesting perspective of ResNet is provided by (Veit et al., 2016). They
showed that ResNet behave behaves like ensemble of shallow networks: the express way
introduced allows ResNet to perform as a collection of independent networks, each network
is significantly shallower than the integrated ResNet itself. This also explains why gradient
can be passed through the ultra-deep architecture without being vanished. (We will talk
more about vanishing gradient problem when we discuss recurrent neural network in the
next section.) Another work, which is not directly relevant to ResNet, but may help to
understand it, is conducted by Hariharan et al. (2015). They showed that features from
lower layers are informative in addition to what can be summarized from the final layer.
ResNet is still not completely vacant from clever designs. The number of layers in the
whole network and the number of layers that Residual Block allows identity to bypass are
still choices that require experimental validations. Nonetheless, to some extent, ResNet
has shown that critical reasoning can help the development of CNN better than blind
41
Wang and Raj
experimental trails. In addition, the idea of Residual Block has been found in the actual
visual cortex (In the ventral stream of the visual cortex, V4 can directly accept signals from
primary visual cortex), although ResNet is not designed according to this in the first place.
With the introduction of these state-of-the-art neural models that are successful in these
challenges, Canziani et al. (2016) conducted a comprehensive experimental study comparing
these models. Upon comparison, they showed that there is still room for improvement on
fully connected layers that show strong inefficiencies for smaller batches of images.
5.6 Challenges and Chances for Fundamental Vision Problems
ResNet is not the end of the story. New models and techniques appear every day to push
the limit of CNNs further. For example, Zhang et al. (2016b) took a step further and
put Residual Block inside Residual Block. Zagoruyko and Komodakis (2016) attempted to
decrease the depth of network by increasing the width. However, incremental works of this
kind are not in the scope of this paper.
We would like to end the story of Convolutional Neural Networks with some of the
current challenges of fundamental vision problems that may not able to be solved naively
by investigation of machine learning techniques.
5.6.1 Network Property and Vision Blindness Spot
Convolutional Neural Networks have reached to an unprecedented accuracy in object detection. However, it may still be far from industry reliable application due to some intriguing
properties found by Szegedy et al. (2013).
Szegedy et al. (2013) showed that they could force a deep learning model to misclassify an
image simply by adding perturbations to that image. More importantly, these perturbations
may not even be observed by naked human eyes. In other words, two objects that look
almost the same to human, may be recognized as different objects by a well-trained neural
network (for example, AlexNet). They have also shown that this property is more likely to
be a modeling problem, in contrast to problems raised by insufficient training.
On the other hand, Nguyen et al. (2015) showed that they could generate patterns
that convey almost no information to human, being recognized as some objects by neural
networks with high confidence (sometimes more than 99%). Since neural networks are typically forced to make a prediction, it is not surprising to see a network classify a meaningless
patter into something, however, this high confidence may indicate that the fundamental
differences between how neural networks and human learn to know this world.
Figure 20 shows some examples from the aforementioned two works. With construction,
we can show that the neural networks may misclassify an object, which should be easily
recognized by the human, to something unusual. On the other hand, a neural network may
also classify some weird patterns, which are not believed to be objects by the human, to
something we are familiar with. Both of these properties may restrict the usage of deep
learning to real world applications when a reliable prediction is necessary.
Even without these examples, one may also realize that the reliable prediction of neural
networks could be an issue due to the fundamental property of a matrix: the existence
of null space. As long as the perturbation happens within the null space of a matrix,
one may be able to alter an image dramatically while the neural network still makes the
42
On the Origin of Deep Learning
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
Figure 20: Illustrations of some mistakes of neural networks. (a)-(d) (from (Szegedy et al.,
2013)) are adversarial images that are generated based on original images. The
differences between these and the original ones are un-observable by naked eye,
but the neural network can successfully classify original ones but fail adversarial
ones. (e)-(h) (from (Nguyen et al., 2015)) are patterns that are generated. A
neural network classify them into (e) school bus, (f) guitar, (g) peacock and (h)
Pekinese respectively.
misclassification with high confidence. Null space works like a blind spot to a matrix and
changes within null space are never sensible to the corresponding matrix.
This blind spot should not discourage the promising future of neural networks. On the
contrary, it makes the convolutional neural network resemble the human vision system in a
deeper level. In the human vision system, blind spots (Gregory and Cavanagh, 2011) also
exist (Wandell, 1995). Interesting work might be seen about linking the flaws of human
vision system to the defects of neural networks and helping to overcome these defects in the
future.
5.6.2 Human Labeling Preference
At the very last, we present some of the misclassified images of ResNet on ImageNet Challenge. Hopefully, some of these examples could inspire some new methodologies invented
for the fundamental vision problem.
Figure 21 shows some misclassified images of ResNet when applied to ImageNet Challenge. These labels, provided by human effort, are very unexpected even to many other
humans. Therefore, the 3.6% error rate of ResNet (a general human usually predicts with
error rate 5%-10%) is probably hitting the limit since the labeling preference of an annotator is harder to predict than the actual labels. For example, Figure 21 (a),(b),(h) are
labeled as a tiny part of the image, while there are more important contents expressed by
the image. On the other hand, Figure 21 (d) (e) are annotated as the background of the
image while that image is obviously centering on other object.
43
Wang and Raj
(a) flute
(b) guinea pig
(c) wig
(d) seashore
(e) alp
(f) screwdriver
(g) comic book
(h) sunglass
Figure 21: Some failed images of ImageNet classification by ResNet and the primary label
associated with the image.
To further improve the performance ResNet reached, one direction might be to modeling
the annotators’ labeling preference. One assumption could be that annotators prefer to label
an image to make it distinguishable. Some established work to modeling human factors
(Wilson et al., 2015) could be helpful.
However, the more important question is that whether it is worth optimizing the model
to increase the testing results on ImageNet dataset, since remaining misclassifications may
not be a result of the incompetency of the model, but problems of annotations.
The introduction of other data sets, like COCO (Lin et al., 2014), Flickr (Plummer et al.,
2015), and VisualGenome (Krishna et al., 2016) may open a new era of vision problems with
more competitive challenges. However, the fundamental problems and experiences that this
section introduces should never be forgotten.
44
On the Origin of Deep Learning
6. Time Series Data and Recurrent Networks
In this section, we will start to discuss a new family of deep learning models that have
attracted many attentions, especially for the tasks on time series data, or sequential data.
The Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) is a class of neural network whose connections of
units form a directed cycle; this nature grants its ability to work with temporal data. It has
also been discussed in literature like (Grossberg, 2013) and (Lipton et al., 2015). In this
paper, we will continue to offer complementary views to other surveys with an emphasis on
the evolutionary history of the milestone models and aim to provide insights into the future
direction of coming models.
6.1 Recurrent Neural Network: Jordan Network and Elman Network
As we have discussed previously, Hopfield Network is widely recognized as a recurrent neural
network, although its formalization is distinctly different from how recurrent neural network
is defined nowadays. Therefore, despite that other literature tend to begin the discussion
of RNN with Hopfield Network, we will not treat it as a member of RNN family to avoid
unnecessary confusion.
The modern definition of “recurrent” is initially introduced by Jordan (1986) as:
If a network has one or more cycles, that is, if it is possible to follow a
path from a unit back to itself, then the network is referred to as recurrent. A
nonrecurrent network has no cycles.
His model in (Jordan, 1986) is later referred to as Jordan Network. For a simple neural
network with one hidden layer, with input denoted as X, weights of hidden layer denoted
as wh and weights of output layer denoted as wy , weights of recurrent computation denoted
as wr , hidden representation denoted as h and output denoted as y, Jordan Network can
be formulated as
ht = σ(Wh X + Wr y t−1 )
y = σ(Wy ht )
A few years later, another RNN was introduced by Elman (1990), when he formalized
the recurrent structure slightly differently. Later, his network is known as Elman Network.
Elman network is formalized as following:
ht = σ(Wh X + Wr ht−1 )
y = σ(Wy ht )
The only difference is that whether the information of previous time step is provided by
previous output or previous hidden layer. This difference is further illustrated in Figure 22.
The difference is illustrated to respect the historical contribution of these works. One may
notice that there is no fundamental difference between these two structures since yt = Wy ht ,
therefore, the only difference lies in the choice of Wr . (Originally, Elman only introduces
his network with Wr = I, but more general cases could be derived from there.)
Nevertheless, the step from Jordan Network to Elman Network is still remarkable as
it introduces the possibility of passing information from hidden layers, which significantly
improve the flexibility of structure design in later work.
45
Wang and Raj
(a) Structure of Jordan Network
(b) Structure of Elman Network
Figure 22: The difference of recurrent structure from Jordan Network and Elman Network.
6.1.1 Backpropagation through Time
The recurrent structure makes traditional backpropagation infeasible because of that with
the recurrent structure, there is not an end point where the backpropagation can stop.
Intuitively, one solution is to unfold the recurrent structure and expand it as a feedforward neural network with certain time steps and then apply traditional backpropagation
onto this unfolded neural network. This solution is known as Backpropagation through Time
(BPTT), independently invented by several researchers including (Robinson and Fallside,
1987; Werbos, 1988; Mozer, 1989)
However, as recurrent neural network usually has a more complex cost surface, naive
backpropagation may not work well. Later in this paper, we will see that the recurrent
structure introduces some critical problems, for example, the vanishing gradient problem,
which makes optimization for RNN a great challenge in the society.
6.2 Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network
If we unfold an RNN, then we can get the structure of a feedforward neural network with infinite depth. Therefore, we can build a conceptual connection between RNN and feedforward
network with infinite layers. Then since through the neural network history, bidirectional
neural networks have been playing important roles (like Hopfield Network, RBM, DBM), a
follow-up question is that what recurrent structures that correspond to the infinite layer of
bidirectional models are. The answer is Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network.
46
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 23: The unfolded structured of BRNN. The temporal order is from left to right.
Hidden layer 1 is unfolded in the standard way of an RNN. Hidden layer 2 is
unfolded to simulate the reverse connection.
Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Network (BRNN) was invented by Schuster and Paliwal
(1997) with the goal to introduce a structure that was unfolded to be a bidirectional neural
network. Therefore, when it is applied to time series data, not only the information can
be passed following the natural temporal sequences, but the further information can also
reversely provide knowledge to previous time steps.
Figure 23 shows the unfolded structure of a BRNN. Hidden layer 1 is unfolded in the
standard way of an RNN. Hidden layer 2 is unfolded to simulate the reverse connection.
Transparency (in Figure 23) is applied to emphasize that unfolding an RNN is only a concept
that is used for illustration purpose. The actual model handles data from different time
steps with the same single model.
BRNN is formulated as following:
ht1 = σ(Wh1 X + Wr1 ht−1
1 )
ht2 = σ(Wh2 X + Wr2 ht+1
2 )
y = σ(Wy1 ht1 + Wy2 ht2 )
where the subscript 1 and 2 denote the variables associated with hidden layer 1 and 2
respectively.
With the introduction of “recurrent” connections back from the future, Backpropagation through Time is no longer directly feasible. The solution is to treat this model as a
combination of two RNNs: a standard one and a reverse one, then apply BPTT onto each
of them. Weights are updated simultaneously once two gradients are computed.
6.3 Long Short-Term Memory
Another breakthrough in RNN family was introduced in the same year as BRNN. Hochreiter
and Schmidhuber (1997) introduced a new neuron for RNN family, named Long Short-Term
Memory (LSTM). When it was invented, the term “LSTM” is used to refer the algorithm
47
Wang and Raj
that is designed to overcome vanishing gradient problem, with the help of a special designed
memory cell. Nowadays, “LSTM” is widely used to denote any recurrent network that
with that memory cell, which is nowadays referred as an LSTM cell.
LSTM was introduced to overcome the problem that RNNs cannot long term dependencies (Bengio et al., 1994). To overcome this issue, it requires the specially designed memory
cell, as illustrated in Figure 24 (a).
LSTM consists of several critical components.
• states: values that are used to offer the information for output.
? input data: it is denoted as x.
? hidden state: values of previous hidden layer. This is the same as traditional
RNN. It is denoted as h.
? input state: values that are (linear) combination of hidden state and input of
current time step. It is denoted as i, and we have:
it = σ(Wix xt + Wih ht−1 )
(9)
? internal state: Values that serve as “memory”. It is denoted as m
• gates: values that are used to decide the information flow of states.
? input gate: it decides whether input state enters internal state. It is denoted as
g, and we have:
g t = σ(Wgi it )
(10)
? forget gate: it decides whether internal state forgets the previous internal state.
It is denoted as f , and we have:
f t = σ(Wf i it )
(11)
? output gate: it decides whether internal state passes its value to output and
hidden state of next time step. It is denoted as o and we have:
ot = σ(Woi it )
(12)
Finally, considering how gates decide the information flow of states, we have the last two
equations to complete the formulation of LSTM:
mt =g t
it + f t mt−1
ht =ot
mt
(13)
(14)
where denotes element-wise product.
Figure 24 describes the details about how LSTM cell works. Figure 24 (b) shows that
how the input state is constructed, as described in Equation 9. Figure 24 (c) shows how
48
On the Origin of Deep Learning
(a) LSTM “memory” cell
(b) Input data and previous hidden
state form into input state
(c) Calculating input gate and forget
gate
(d) Calculating output gate
(e) Update internal state
(f) Output and update hidden state
Figure 24: The LSTM cell and its detailed functions.
49
Wang and Raj
input gate and forget gate are computed, as described in Equation 10 and Equation 11.
Figure 24 (d) shows how output gate is computed, as described in Equation 12. Figure 24
(e) shows how internal state is updated, as described in Equation 13. Figure 24 (f) shows
how output and hidden state are updated, as described in Equation 14.
All the weights are parameters that need to be learned during training. Therefore,
theoretically, LSTM can learn to memorize long time dependency if necessary and can
learn to forget the past when necessary, making itself a powerful model.
With this important theoretical guarantee, many works have been attempted to improve
LSTM. For example, Gers and Schmidhuber (2000) added a peephole connection that allows
the gate to use information from the internal state. Cho et al. (2014) introduced the Gated
Recurrent Unit, known as GRU, which simplified LSTM by merging internal state and
hidden state into one state, and merging forget gate and input gate into a simple update
gate. Integrating LSTM cell into bidirectional RNN is also an intuitive follow-up to look
into (Graves et al., 2013).
Interestingly, despite the novel LSTM variants proposed now and then, Greff et al.
(2015) conducted a large-scale experiment investigating the performance of LSTMs and got
the conclusion that none of the variants can improve upon the standard LSTM architecture
significantly. Probably, the improvement of LSTM is in another direction rather than
updating the structure inside a cell. Attention models seem to be a direction to go.
6.4 Attention Models
Attention Models are loosely based on a bionic design to simulate the behavior of human
vision attention mechanism: when humans look at an image, we do not scan it bit by bit
or stare at the whole image, but we focus on some major part of it and gradually build the
context after capturing the gist. Attention mechanisms were first discussed by Larochelle
and Hinton (2010) and Denil et al. (2012). The attention models mostly refer to the models
that were introduced in (Bahdanau et al., 2014) for machine translation and soon applied to
many different domains like (Chorowski et al., 2015) for speech recognition and (Xu et al.,
2015) for image caption generation.
Attention models are mostly used for sequence output prediction. Instead of seeing the
whole sequential data and make one single prediction (for example, language model), the
model needs to make a sequential prediction for the sequential input for tasks like machine
translation or image caption generation. Therefore, the attention model is mostly used to
answer the question on where to pay attention to based on previously predicted labels or
hidden states.
The output sequence may not have to be linked one-to-one to the input sequence, and the
input data may not even be a sequence. Therefore, usually, an encoder-decoder framework
(Cho et al., 2015) is necessary. The encoder is used to encode the data into representations
and decoder is used to make sequential predictions. Attention mechanism is used to locate
a region of the representation for predicting the label in current time step.
Figure 25 shows a basic attention model under encoder-decoder network structure. The
representation encoder encodes is all accessible to attention model, and attention model only
selects some regions to pass onto the LSTM cell for further usage of prediction making.
50
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Figure 25: The unfolded structured of an attention model. Transparency is used to show
that unfolding is only conceptual. The representation encoder learns are all
available to the decoder across all time steps. Attention module only selects
some to pass onto LSTM cell for prediction.
Therefore, all the magic of attention models is about how this attention module in
Figure 25 helps to localize the informative representations.
To formalize how it works, we use r to denote the encoded representation (there is a
total of M regions of representation), use h to denote hidden states of LSTM cell. Then,
the attention module can generate the unscaled weights for ith region of the encoded representation as:
βit = f (ht−1 , r, {αjt−1 }M
j=1 )
where αjt−1 is the attention weights computed at the previous time step, and can be computed at current time step as a simple softmax function:
exp(βit )
αit = PM
t
j exp(βj )
Therefore, we can further use the weights α to reweight the representation r for prediction.
There are two ways for the representation to be reweighted:
• Soft attention: The result is a simple weighted sum of the context vectors such that:
t
r =
M
X
αjt cj
j
• Hard attention: The model is forced to make a hard decision by only localizing one
region: sampling one region out following multinoulli distribution.
51
Wang and Raj
(a) Deep input architecture
(b) Deep recurrent architecture
(c) Deep output architecture
Figure 26: Three different formulations of deep recurrent neural network.
One problem about hard attention is that sampling out of multinoulli distribution is
not differentiable. Therefore, the gradient based method can be hardly applied. Variational
methods (Ba et al., 2014) or policy gradient based method (Sutton et al., 1999) can be
considered.
6.5 Deep RNNs and the future of RNNs
In this very last section of the evolutionary path of RNN family, we will visit some ideas
that have not been fully explored.
6.5.1 Deep Recurrent Neural Network
Although recurrent neural network suffers many issues that deep neural network has because
of the recurrent connections, current RNNs are still not deep models regarding representation learning compared to models in other families.
Pascanu et al. (2013a) formalizes the idea of constructing deep RNNs by extending
current RNNs. Figure 26 shows three different directions to construct a deep recurrent
neural network by increasing the layers of the input component (Figure 26 (a)), recurrent
component (Figure 26 (b)) and output component (Figure 26 (c)) respectively.
52
On the Origin of Deep Learning
6.5.2 The Future of RNNs
RNNs have been improved in a variety of different ways, like assembling the pieces together
with Conditional Random Field (Yang et al., 2016), and together with CNN components
(Ma and Hovy, 2016). In addition, convolutional operation can be directly built into LSTM,
resulting ConvLSTM (Xingjian et al., 2015), and then this ConvLSTM can be also connected
with a variety of different components (De Brabandere et al., 2016; Kalchbrenner et al.,
2016).
One of the most fundamental problems of training RNNs is the vanishing/exploding
gradient problem, introduced in detail in (Bengio et al., 1994). The problem basically
states that for traditional activation functions, the gradient is bounded. When gradients are
computed by backpropagation following chain rule, the error signal decreases exponentially
within the time steps the BPTT can trace back, so the long-term dependency is lost.
LSTM and ReLU are known to be good solutions for vanishing/exploding gradient problem.
However, these solutions introduce ways to bypass this problem with clever design, instead
of solving it fundamentally. While these methods work well practically, the fundamental
problem for a general RNN is still to be solved. Pascanu et al. (2013b) attempted some
solutions, but there are still more to be done.
53
Wang and Raj
7. Optimization of Neural Networks
The primary focus of this paper is deep learning models. However, optimization is an
inevitable topic in the development history of deep learning models. In this section, we will
briefly revisit the major topics of optimization of neural networks. During our introduction
of the models, some algorithms have been discussed along with the models. Here, we will
only discuss the remaining methods that have not been mentioned previously.
7.1 Gradient Methods
Despite the fact that neural networks have been developed for over fifty years, the optimization of neural networks still heavily rely on gradient descent methods within the algorithm
of backpropagation. This paper does not intend to introduce the classical backpropagation,
gradient descent method and its stochastic version and batch version and simple techniques
like momentum method, but starts right after these topics.
Therefore, the discussion of following gradient methods starts from the vanilla gradient
descent as following:
θt+1 = θt − η5tθ
where 5θ is the gradient of the parameter θ, η is a hyperparameter, usually known as
learning rate.
7.1.1 Rprop
Rprop was introduced by Riedmiller and Braun (1993). It is a unique method even studied
back today as it does not fully utilize the information of gradient, but only considers the
sign of it. In other words, it updates the parameters following:
θt+1 = θt − ηI(5tθ > 0) + ηI(5tθ < 0)
where I(·) stands for an indicator function.
This unique formalization allows the gradient method to overcome some cost curvatures
that may not be easily solved with today’s dominant methods. This two-decade-old method
may be worth some further study these days.
7.1.2 AdaGrad
AdaGrad was introduced by Duchi et al. (2011). It follows the idea of introducing an
adaptive learning rate mechanism that assigns higher learning rate to the parameters that
have been updated more mildly and assigns lower learning rate to the parameters that have
been updated dramatically. The measure of the degree of the update applied is the `2
norm of historical gradients, S t = ||51θ , 52θ , ... 5tθ ||22 , therefore we have the update rule as
following:
θt+1 = θt −
St
where is small term to avoid η divided by zero.
54
η
5t
+ θ
On the Origin of Deep Learning
AdaGrad has been showed with great improvement of robustness upon traditional gradient method (Dean et al., 2012). However, the problem is that as `2 norm accumulates,
the fraction of η over `2 norm decays to a substantial small term.
7.1.3 AdaDelta
AdaDelta is an extension of AdaGrad that aims to reducing the decaying rate of learning
rate, proposed in (Zeiler, 2012). Instead of accumulating the gradients of each time step as
in AdaGrad, AdaDelta re-weights previously accumulation before adding current term onto
previously accumulated result, resulting in:
(S t )2 = β(S t−1 )2 + (1 − β)(5tθ )2
where β is the weight for re-weighting. Then the update rule is the same as AdaGrad:
θt+1 = θt −
St
η
5t
+ θ
which is almost the same as another famous gradient variant named RMSprop10 .
7.1.4 Adam
Adam stands for Adaptive Moment Estimation, proposed in (Kingma and Ba, 2014). Adam
is like a combination momentum method and AdaGrad method, but each component are
re-weighted at time step t. Formally, at time step t, we have:
∆tθ =α∆t−1
+ (1 − α)5tθ
θ
(S t )2 =β(S t−1 )2 + (1 − β)(5tθ )2
η
θt+1 =θt − t
∆t
S + θ
All these modern gradient variants have been published with a promising claim that is
helpful to improve the convergence rate of previous methods. Empirically, these methods
seem to be indeed helpful, however, in many cases, a good choice of these methods seems
only to benefit to a limited extent.
7.2 Dropout
Dropout was introduced in (Hinton et al., 2012; Srivastava et al., 2014). The technique soon
got influential, not only because of its good performance but also because of its simplicity
of implementation. The idea is very simple: randomly dropping out some of the units while
training. More formally: on each training case, each hidden unit is randomly omitted from
the network with a probability of p.
As suggested by Hinton et al. (2012), Dropout can be seen as an efficient way to perform
model averaging across a large number of different neural networks, where overfitting can
be avoided with much less cost of computation.
10. It seems this method never gets published, the resources all trace back to Hinton’s slides at
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/t̃ijmen/csc321/slides/lecture slides lec6.pdf
55
Wang and Raj
Because of the actual performance it introduces, Dropout soon became very popular
upon its introduction, a lot of work has attempted to understand its mechanism in different
perspectives, including (Baldi and Sadowski, 2013; Cho, 2013; Ma et al., 2016). It has also
been applied to train other models, like SVM (Chen et al., 2014).
7.3 Batch Normalization and Layer Normalization
Batch Normalization, introduced by Ioffe and Szegedy (2015), is another breakthrough of
optimization of deep neural networks. They addressed the problem they named as internal
covariate shift. Intuitively, the problem can be understood as the following two steps: 1) a
learned function is barely useful if its input changes (In statistics, the input of a function is
sometimes denoted as covariates). 2) each layer is a function and the changes of parameters
of below layers change the input of current layer. This change could be dramatic as it may
shift the distribution of inputs.
Ioffe and Szegedy (2015) proposed the Batch Normalization to solve this issue, formally
following the steps:
n
1X
µB =
xi
n
i=1
n
1X
2
σB
=
(xi − µB )2
n
i=1
x i − µB
x̂i =
σB +
yi =σL x̂i + µL
where µB and σB denote the mean and variance of that batch. µL and σL two parameters
learned by the algorithm to rescale and shift the output. xi and yi are inputs and outputs
of that function respectively.
These steps are performed for every batch during training. Batch Normalization turned
out to work very well in training empirically and soon became popularly.
As a follow-up, Ba et al. (2016) proposes the technique Layer Normalization, where
they “transpose” batch normalization into layer normalization by computing the mean and
variance used for normalization from all of the summed inputs to the neurons in a layer on a
single training case. Therefore, this technique has a nature advantage of being applicable to
recurrent neural network straightforwardly. However, it seems that this “transposed batch
normalization” cannot be implemented as simple as Batch Normalization. Therefore, it has
not become as influential as Batch Normalization is.
7.4 Optimization for “Optimal” Model Architecture
In the very last section of optimization techniques for neural networks, we revisit some old
methods that have been attempted with the aim to learn the “optimal” model architecture.
Many of these methods are known as constructive network approaches. Most of these methods have been proposed decades ago and did not raise enough impact back then. Nowadays,
with more powerful computation resources, people start to consider these methods again.
56
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Two remarks need to be made before we proceed: 1) Obviously, most of these methods can trace back to counterparts in non-parametric machine learning field, but because
most of these methods did not perform enough to raise an impact, focusing a discussion on
the evolutionary path may mislead readers. Instead, we will only list these methods for the
readers who seek for inspiration. 2) Many of these methods are not exclusively optimization
techniques because these methods are usually proposed with a particularly designed architecture. Technically speaking, these methods should be distributed to previous sections
according to the models associated. However, because these methods can barely inspire
modern modeling research, but may have a chance to inspire modern optimization research,
we list these methods in this section.
7.4.1 Cascade-Correlation Learning
One of the earliest and most important works on this topic was proposed by Fahlman and
Lebiere (1989). They introduced a model, as well as its corresponding algorithm named
Cascade-Correlation Learning. The idea is that the algorithm starts with a minimum network and builds up towards a bigger network. Whenever another hidden unit is added,
the parameters of previous hidden units are fixed, and the algorithm only searches for an
optimal parameter for the newly-added hidden unit.
Interestingly, the unique architecture of Cascade-Correlation Learning grants the network to grow deeper and wider at the same time because every newly added hidden unit
takes the data together with outputs of previously added units as input.
Two important questions of this algorithm are 1) when to fix the parameters of current
hidden units and proceed to add and tune a newly added one 2) when to terminate the
entire algorithm. These two questions are answered in a similar manner: the algorithm
adds a new hidden unit when there are no significant changes in existing architecture and
terminates when the overall performance is satisfying. This training process may introduce
problems of overfitting, which might account for the fact that this method is seen much in
modern deep learning research.
7.4.2 Tiling Algorithm
Mézard and Nadal (1989) presented the idea of Tiling Algorithm, which learns the parameters, the number of layers, as well as the number of hidden units in each layer simultaneously
for feedforward neural network on Boolean functions. Later this algorithm was extended to
multiple class version by Parekh et al. (1997).
The algorithm works in such a way that on every layer, it tries to build a layer of hidden
units that can cluster the data into different clusters where there is only one label in one
cluster. The algorithm keeps increasing the number of hidden units until such a clustering
pattern can be achieved and proceed to add another layer.
Mézard and Nadal (1989) also offered a proof of theoretical guarantees for Tiling Algorithm. Basically, the theorem says that Tiling Algorithm can greedily improve the performance of a neural network.
57
Wang and Raj
7.4.3 Upstart Algorithm
Frean (1990) proposed the Upstart Algorithm. Long story short, this algorithm is simply a
neural network version of the standard decision tree (Safavian and Landgrebe, 1990) where
each tree node is replaced with a linear perceptron. Therefore, the tree is seen as a neural
network because it uses the core component of neural networks as a tree node. As a result,
standard way of building a tree is advertised as building a neural network automatically.
Similarly, Bengio et al. (2005) proposed a boosting algorithm where they replace the
weak classifier as neurons.
7.4.4 Evolutionary Algorithm
Evolutionary Algorithm is a family of algorithms uses mechanisms inspired by biological
evolution to search in a parameter space for the optimal solution. Some prominent examples
in this family are genetic algorithm (Mitchell, 1998), which simulates natural selection and
ant colony optimization algorithm (Colorni et al., 1991), which simulates the cooperation
of an ant colony to explore surroundings.
Yao (1999) offered an extensive survey of the usage of evolution algorithm upon the
optimization of neural networks, in which Yao introduced several encoding schemes that
can enable the neural network architecture to be learned with evolutionary algorithms. The
encoding schemes basically transfer the network architecture into vectors, so that a standard
algorithm can take it as input and optimize it.
So far, we discussed some representative algorithms that are aimed to learn the network
architecture automatically. Most of these algorithms eventually fade out of modern deep
learning research, we conjecture two main reasons for this outcome: 1) Most of these algorithms tend to overfit the data. 2) Most of these algorithms are following a greedy search
paradigm, which will be unlikely to find the optimal architecture.
However, with the rapid development of machine learning methods and computation
resources in the last decade, we hope these constructive network methods we listed here
can still inspire the readers for substantial contributions to modern deep learning research.
58
On the Origin of Deep Learning
8. Conclusion
In this paper, we have revisited the evolutionary path of the nowadays deep learning models.
We revisited the paths for three major families of deep learning models: the deep generative
model family, convolutional neural network family, and recurrent neural network family as
well as some topics for optimization techniques.
This paper could serve two goals: 1) First, it documents the major milestones in the
science history that have impacted the current development of deep learning. These milestones are not limited to the development in computer science fields. 2) More importantly,
by revisiting the evolutionary path of the major milestone, this paper should be able to suggest the readers that how these remarkable works are developed among thousands of other
contemporaneous publications. Here we briefly summarize three directions that many of
these milestones pursue:
• Occam’s razor: While it seems that part of the society tends to favor more complex
models by layering up one architecture onto another and hoping backpropagation can
find the optimal parameters, history says that masterminds tend to think simple:
Dropout is widely recognized not only because of its performance, but more because
of its simplicity in implementation and intuitive (tentative) reasoning. From Hopfield
Network to Restricted Boltzmann Machine, models are simplified along the iterations
until when RBM is ready to be piled-up.
• Be ambitious: If a model is proposed with substantially more parameters than
contemporaneous ones, it must solve a problem that no others can solve nicely to be
remarkable. LSTM is much more complex than traditional RNN, but it bypasses the
vanishing gradient problem nicely. Deep Belief Network is famous not due to the fact
the they are the first one to come up with the idea of putting one RBM onto another,
but due to that they come up an algorithm that allow deep architectures to be trained
effectively.
• Widely read: Many models are inspired by domain knowledge outside of machine
learning or statistics field. Human visual cortex has greatly inspired the development
of convolutional neural networks. Even the recent popular Residual Networks can find
corresponding mechanism in human visual cortex. Generative Adversarial Network
can also find some connection with game theory, which was developed fifty years ago.
We hope these directions can help some readers to impact more on current society. More
directions should also be able to be summarized through our revisit of these milestones by
readers.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the demo from http://beej.us/blog/data/convolution-image-processing/ for a
quick generation of examples in Figure 16. Thanks to Bojian Han at Carnegie Mellon University for the examples in Figure 21. Thanks to the blog at http://sebastianruder.com/optimizinggradient-descent/index.html for a summary of gradient methods in Section 7.1. Thanks to
Yutong Zheng and Xupeng Tong at Carnegie Mellon University for suggesting some relevant
contents.
59
Wang and Raj
References
Emile Aarts and Jan Korst. Simulated annealing and boltzmann machines. 1988.
David H Ackley, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Terrence J Sejnowski. A learning algorithm for
boltzmann machines. Cognitive science, 9(1):147–169, 1985.
James A Anderson and Edward Rosenfeld. Talking nets: An oral history of neural networks.
MiT Press, 2000.
Martin Arjovsky, Soumith Chintala, and Léon Bottou. Wasserstein gan. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1701.07875, 2017.
Jimmy Ba, Volodymyr Mnih, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Multiple object recognition with
visual attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7755, 2014.
Jimmy Lei Ba, Jamie Ryan Kiros, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Layer normalization. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1607.06450, 2016.
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Neural machine translation by
jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014.
Alexander Bain. Mind and Body the Theories of Their Relation by Alexander Bain. Henry
S. King & Company, 1873.
Pierre Baldi and Peter J Sadowski. Understanding dropout. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2814–2822, 2013.
Peter L Bartlett and Wolfgang Maass. Vapnik chervonenkis dimension of neural nets. The
handbook of brain theory and neural networks, pages 1188–1192, 2003.
Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. Surf: Speeded up robust features. In
European conference on computer vision, pages 404–417. Springer, 2006.
Yoshua Bengio. Learning deep architectures for ai. Foundations and trends R in Machine
Learning, 2(1):1–127, 2009.
Yoshua Bengio and Olivier Delalleau. On the expressive power of deep architectures. In
International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, pages 18–36. Springer, 2011.
Yoshua Bengio, Patrice Simard, and Paolo Frasconi. Learning long-term dependencies with
gradient descent is difficult. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(2):157–166, 1994.
Yoshua Bengio, Nicolas L Roux, Pascal Vincent, Olivier Delalleau, and Patrice Marcotte.
Convex neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
123–130, 2005.
Yoshua Bengio, Pascal Lamblin, Dan Popovici, Hugo Larochelle, et al. Greedy layer-wise
training of deep networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 19:153,
2007.
60
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Monica Bianchini and Franco Scarselli. On the complexity of shallow and deep neural
network classifiers. In ESANN, 2014.
CG Boeree. Psychology: the beginnings. Retrieved April, 26:2008, 2000.
James G Booth and James P Hobert. Maximizing generalized linear mixed model likelihoods
with an automated monte carlo em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society:
Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61(1):265–285, 1999.
Jörg Bornschein and Yoshua Bengio.
arXiv:1406.2751, 2014.
Reweighted wake-sleep.
arXiv preprint
Nirmal K Bose et al. Neural network fundamentals with graphs, algorithms, and applications.
Number 612.82 BOS. 1996.
Martin L Brady, Raghu Raghavan, and Joseph Slawny. Back propagation fails to separate
where perceptrons succeed. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 36(5):665–674,
1989.
George W Brown. Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. Activity analysis of production and allocation, 13(1):374–376, 1951.
John A Bullinaria. Self organizing maps: Fundamentals. Introduction to Neural, 2004.
Yuri Burda, Roger Grosse, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Importance weighted autoencoders.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00519, 2015.
WH Burnham. Memory, historically and experimentally considered. i. an historical sketch
of the older conceptions of memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 2(1):39–90,
1888.
Alfredo Canziani, Adam Paszke, and Eugenio Culurciello. An analysis of deep neural
network models for practical applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07678, 2016.
Miguel A Carreira-Perpinan and Geoffrey Hinton. On contrastive divergence learning. In
AISTATS, volume 10, pages 33–40. Citeseer, 2005.
Juan Luis Castro, Carlos Javier Mantas, and JM Benıtez. Neural networks with a continuous
squashing function in the output are universal approximators. Neural Networks, 13(6):
561–563, 2000.
Ning Chen, Jun Zhu, Jianfei Chen, and Bo Zhang. Dropout training for support vector
machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.4171, 2014.
Xi Chen, Yan Duan, Rein Houthooft, John Schulman, Ilya Sutskever, and Pieter Abbeel.
Infogan: Interpretable representation learning by information maximizing generative adversarial nets. In Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2172–2180,
2016.
61
Wang and Raj
KyungHyun Cho. Understanding dropout: training multi-layer perceptrons with auxiliary independent stochastic neurons. In International Conference on Neural Information
Processing, pages 474–481. Springer, 2013.
Kyunghyun Cho, Bart Van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi
Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. Learning phrase representations using
rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078,
2014.
Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Describing multimedia content
using attention-based encoder-decoder networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17
(11):1875–1886, 2015.
Anna Choromanska, Mikael Henaff, Michael Mathieu, Gérard Ben Arous, and Yann LeCun.
The loss surfaces of multilayer networks. In AISTATS, 2015.
Jan K Chorowski, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Dmitriy Serdyuk, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Attention-based models for speech recognition. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 577–585, 2015.
Avital Cnaan, NM Laird, and Peter Slasor. Tutorial in biostatistics: Using the general
linear mixed model to analyse unbalanced repeated measures and longitudinal data. Stat
Med, 16:2349–2380, 1997.
Alberto Colorni, Marco Dorigo, Vittorio Maniezzo, et al. Distributed optimization by ant
colonies. In Proceedings of the first European conference on artificial life, volume 142,
pages 134–142. Paris, France, 1991.
David Daniel Cox and Thomas Dean. Neural networks and neuroscience-inspired computer
vision. Current Biology, 24(18):R921–R929, 2014.
G Cybenko. Continuous valued neural networks with two hidden layers are sufficient. 1988.
George Cybenko. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics
of control, signals and systems, 2(4):303–314, 1989.
Zihang Dai, Amjad Almahairi, Bachman Philip, Eduard Hovy, and Aaron Courville. Calibrating energy-based generative adversarial networks. ICLR submission, 2017.
Yann N Dauphin, Razvan Pascanu, Caglar Gulcehre, Kyunghyun Cho, Surya Ganguli, and
Yoshua Bengio. Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional
non-convex optimization. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
2933–2941, 2014.
Bert De Brabandere, Xu Jia, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. Dynamic filter networks.
In Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2016.
Vincent De Ladurantaye, Jacques Vanden-Abeele, and Jean Rouat. Models of information
processing in the visual cortex. Citeseer, 2012.
62
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Jeffrey Dean, Greg Corrado, Rajat Monga, Kai Chen, Matthieu Devin, Mark Mao, Andrew
Senior, Paul Tucker, Ke Yang, Quoc V Le, et al. Large scale distributed deep networks.
In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1223–1231, 2012.
Olivier Delalleau and Yoshua Bengio. Shallow vs. deep sum-product networks. In Advances
in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 666–674, 2011.
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A largescale hierarchical image database. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.
CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 248–255. IEEE, 2009.
Misha Denil, Loris Bazzani, Hugo Larochelle, and Nando de Freitas. Learning where to
attend with deep architectures for image tracking. Neural computation, 24(8):2151–2184,
2012.
Jean-Pierre Didier and Emmanuel Bigand. Rethinking physical and rehabilitation medicine:
New technologies induce new learning strategies. Springer Science & Business Media,
2011.
Carl Doersch. Tutorial on variational autoencoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05908, 2016.
John Duchi, Elad Hazan, and Yoram Singer. Adaptive subgradient methods for online
learning and stochastic optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(Jul):
2121–2159, 2011.
Angela Lee Duckworth, Eli Tsukayama, and Henry May. Establishing causality using longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling: An illustration predicting achievement from selfcontrol. Social psychological and personality science, 2010.
Samuel Frederick Edwards and Phil W Anderson. Theory of spin glasses. Journal of Physics
F: Metal Physics, 5(5):965, 1975.
Ronen Eldan and Ohad Shamir. The power of depth for feedforward neural networks. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1512.03965, 2015.
Jeffrey L Elman. Finding structure in time. Cognitive science, 14(2):179–211, 1990.
Dumitru Erhan, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, Pierre-Antoine Manzagol, Pascal Vincent,
and Samy Bengio. Why does unsupervised pre-training help deep learning? Journal of
Machine Learning Research, 11(Feb):625–660, 2010.
Scott E Fahlman and Christian Lebiere. The cascade-correlation learning architecture.
1989.
Marcus Frean. The upstart algorithm: A method for constructing and training feedforward
neural networks. Neural computation, 2(2):198–209, 1990.
Kunihiko Fukushima. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological cybernetics, 36(4):
193–202, 1980.
63
Wang and Raj
Leon A Gatys, Alexander S Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. A neural algorithm of artistic
style. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.06576, 2015.
Tom Germano.
Self organizing maps.
matt/courses/soms, 1999.
Available in http://davis. wpi. edu/˜
Felix A Gers and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Recurrent nets that time and count. In Neural
Networks, 2000. IJCNN 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint
Conference on, volume 3, pages 189–194. IEEE, 2000.
Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1440–1448, 2015.
Ross Girshick, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Jitendra Malik. Rich feature hierarchies
for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE
conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 580–587, 2014.
Ian Goodfellow. Nips 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1701.00160, 2016.
Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil
Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2672–2680, 2014.
Marco Gori and Alberto Tesi. On the problem of local minima in backpropagation. IEEE
Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(1):76–86, 1992.
Céline Gravelines. Deep Learning via Stacked Sparse Autoencoders for Automated VoxelWise Brain Parcellation Based on Functional Connectivity. PhD thesis, The University
of Western Ontario, 1991.
Alex Graves, Navdeep Jaitly, and Abdel-rahman Mohamed. Hybrid speech recognition with
deep bidirectional lstm. In Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU),
2013 IEEE Workshop on, pages 273–278. IEEE, 2013.
Klaus Greff, Rupesh Kumar Srivastava, Jan Koutnı́k, Bas R Steunebrink, and Jürgen
Schmidhuber. Lstm: A search space odyssey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.04069, 2015.
Richard Gregory and Patrick Cavanagh. The blind spot. Scholarpedia, 6(10):9618, 2011.
Stephen Grossberg. Recurrent neural networks. Scholarpedia, 8(2):1888, 2013.
Aman Gupta, Haohan Wang, and Madhavi Ganapathiraju. Learning structure in gene
expression data using deep architectures, with an application to gene clustering. In
Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages
1328–1335. IEEE, 2015.
Kevin Gurney. An introduction to neural networks. CRC press, 1997.
Shyam M Guthikonda. Kohonen self-organizing maps. Wittenberg University, 2005.
64
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Bharath Hariharan, Pablo Arbeláez, Ross Girshick, and Jitendra Malik. Hypercolumns for
object segmentation and fine-grained localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 447–456, 2015.
David Hartley. Observations on Man, volume 1. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Johan Hastad. Almost optimal lower bounds for small depth circuits. In Proceedings of the
eighteenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages 6–20. ACM, 1986.
James V Haxby, Elizabeth A Hoffman, and M Ida Gobbini. The distributed human neural
system for face perception. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(6):223–233, 2000.
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image
recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03385, 2015.
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Identity mappings in deep
residual networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.05027, 2016.
Donald Olding Hebb. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Psychology Press, 1949.
Robert Hecht-Nielsen. Theory of the backpropagation neural network. In Neural Networks,
1989. IJCNN., International Joint Conference on, pages 593–605. IEEE, 1989.
Geoffrey E Hinton. Training products of experts by minimizing contrastive divergence.
Neural computation, 14(8):1771–1800, 2002.
Geoffrey E Hinton, Peter Dayan, Brendan J Frey, and Radford M Neal. The” wake-sleep”
algorithm for unsupervised neural networks. Science, 268(5214):1158, 1995.
Geoffrey E Hinton, Simon Osindero, and Yee-Whye Teh. A fast learning algorithm for deep
belief nets. Neural computation, 18(7):1527–1554, 2006.
Geoffrey E Hinton, Nitish Srivastava, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan R
Salakhutdinov. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580, 2012.
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Long short-term memory. Neural computation,
9(8):1735–1780, 1997.
John J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982.
Kurt Hornik, Maxwell Stinchcombe, and Halbert White. Multilayer feedforward networks
are universal approximators. Neural networks, 2(5):359–366, 1989.
Zhiting Hu, Xuezhe Ma, Zhengzhong Liu, Eduard Hovy, and Eric Xing. Harnessing deep
neural networks with logic rules. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06318, 2016.
David H Hubel and Torsten N Wiesel. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate
cortex. The Journal of physiology, 148(3):574–591, 1959.
65
Wang and Raj
Sergey Ioffe and Christian Szegedy. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167, 2015.
Michael I Jordan. Serial order: A parallel distributed processing approach. Advances in
psychology, 121:471–495, 1986.
Nal Kalchbrenner, Aaron van den Oord, Karen Simonyan, Ivo Danihelka, Oriol Vinyals,
Alex Graves, and Koray Kavukcuoglu.
Video pixel networks.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1610.00527, 2016.
Kiyoshi Kawaguchi. A multithreaded software model for backpropagation neural network
applications. 2000.
AG Khachaturyan, SV Semenovskaya, and B Vainstein. A statistical-thermodynamic approach to determination of structure amplitude phases. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr, 24:519–
524, 1979.
Diederik Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
Diederik P Kingma, Shakir Mohamed, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Max Welling. Semisupervised learning with deep generative models. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 3581–3589, 2014.
Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen. John von neumann’s conception of the minimax theorem: a journey
through different mathematical contexts. Archive for history of exact sciences, 56(1):
39–68, 2001.
Teuvo Kohonen. The self-organizing map. Proceedings of the IEEE, 78(9):1464–1480, 1990.
Bryan Kolb, Ian Q Whishaw, and G Campbell Teskey. An introduction to brain and behavior, volume 1273. 2014.
Mark L Krieg. A tutorial on bayesian belief networks. 2001.
Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz,
Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-Jia Li, David A Shamma, et al. Visual genome:
Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1602.07332, 2016.
Alex Krizhevsky and Geoffrey Hinton. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images.
2009.
Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep
convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems,
pages 1097–1105, 2012.
66
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Tejas D Kulkarni, William F Whitney, Pushmeet Kohli, and Josh Tenenbaum. Deep convolutional inverse graphics network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,
pages 2539–2547, 2015.
Brenden M Lake, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. Human-level concept
learning through probabilistic program induction. Science, 350(6266):1332–1338, 2015.
Alan S Lapedes and Robert M Farber. How neural nets work. In Neural information
processing systems, pages 442–456, 1988.
Hugo Larochelle and Geoffrey E Hinton. Learning to combine foveal glimpses with a thirdorder boltzmann machine. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages
1243–1251, 2010.
B Boser Le Cun, John S Denker, D Henderson, Richard E Howard, W Hubbard, and
Lawrence D Jackel. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In
Advances in neural information processing systems. Citeseer, 1990.
Yann LeCun, Léon Bottou, Yoshua Bengio, and Patrick Haffner. Gradient-based learning
applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278–2324, 1998a.
Yann LeCun, Corinna Cortes, and Christopher JC Burges. The mnist database of handwritten digits, 1998b.
Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):
436–444, 2015.
Honglak Lee, Roger Grosse, Rajesh Ranganath, and Andrew Y Ng. Convolutional deep
belief networks for scalable unsupervised learning of hierarchical representations. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning, pages 609–616.
ACM, 2009.
Zhaoping Li. A neural model of contour integration in the primary visual cortex. Neural
computation, 10(4):903–940, 1998.
Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan,
Piotr Dollár, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In
European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 740–755. Springer, 2014.
Cheng-Yuan Liou and Shiao-Lin Lin. Finite memory loading in hairy neurons. Natural
Computing, 5(1):15–42, 2006.
Cheng-Yuan Liou and Shao-Kuo Yuan. Error tolerant associative memory. Biological Cybernetics, 81(4):331–342, 1999.
Christoph Lippert, Jennifer Listgarten, Ying Liu, Carl M Kadie, Robert I Davidson, and
David Heckerman. Fast linear mixed models for genome-wide association studies. Nature
methods, 8(10):833–835, 2011.
Zachary C Lipton, John Berkowitz, and Charles Elkan. A critical review of recurrent neural
networks for sequence learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.00019, 2015.
67
Wang and Raj
David G Lowe. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Computer vision,
1999. The proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on, volume 2, pages
1150–1157. Ieee, 1999.
Xuezhe Ma and Eduard Hovy. End-to-end sequence labeling via bi-directional lstm-cnns-crf.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.01354, 2016.
Xuezhe Ma, Yingkai Gao, Zhiting Hu, Yaoliang Yu, Yuntian Deng, and Eduard Hovy.
Dropout with expectation-linear regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08017, 2016.
M Maschler, Eilon Solan, and Shmuel Zamir. Game theory. translated from the hebrew by
ziv hellman and edited by mike borns, 2013.
Charles E McCulloch and John M Neuhaus. Generalized linear mixed models. Wiley Online
Library, 2001.
Warren S McCulloch and Walter Pitts. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous
activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 5(4):115–133, 1943.
Marc Mézard and Jean-P Nadal. Learning in feedforward layered networks: The tiling
algorithm. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 22(12):2191, 1989.
Marc Mézard, Giorgio Parisi, and Miguel-Angel Virasoro. Spin glass theory and beyond.
1990.
Marvin L Minski and Seymour A Papert. Perceptrons: an introduction to computational
geometry. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 1969.
Melanie Mitchell. An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT press, 1998.
Tom M Mitchell et al. Machine learning. wcb, 1997.
Jeffrey Moran and Robert Desimone. Selective attention gates visual processing in the
extrastriate cortex. Frontiers in cognitive neuroscience, 229:342–345, 1985.
Michael C Mozer. A focused back-propagation algorithm for temporal pattern recognition.
Complex systems, 3(4):349–381, 1989.
Kevin P Murphy. Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT press, 2012.
Vinod Nair and Geoffrey E Hinton. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann
machines. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML-10), pages 807–814, 2010.
John Nash. Non-cooperative games. Annals of mathematics, pages 286–295, 1951.
John F Nash et al. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 36
(1):48–49, 1950.
Anh Nguyen, Jason Yosinski, and Jeff Clune. Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High
confidence predictions for unrecognizable images. In 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 427–436. IEEE, 2015.
68
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Danh V Nguyen, Damla Şentürk, and Raymond J Carroll. Covariate-adjusted linear mixed
effects model with an application to longitudinal data. Journal of nonparametric statistics, 20(6):459–481, 2008.
Erkki Oja. Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer. Journal of mathematical biology, 15(3):267–273, 1982.
Erkki Oja and Juha Karhunen. On stochastic approximation of the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of the expectation of a random matrix. Journal of mathematical analysis and
applications, 106(1):69–84, 1985.
Aaron van den Oord, Nal Kalchbrenner, and Koray Kavukcuoglu. Pixel recurrent neural
networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.06759, 2016.
Keiichi Osako, Rita Singh, and Bhiksha Raj. Complex recurrent neural networks for denoising speech signals. In Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), 2015 IEEE Workshop on, pages 1–5. IEEE, 2015.
Rajesh G Parekh, Jihoon Yang, and Vasant Honavar. Constructive neural network learning
algorithms for multi-category real-valued pattern classification. 1997.
Razvan Pascanu, Caglar Gulcehre, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. How to construct
deep recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6026, 2013a.
Razvan Pascanu, Tomas Mikolov, and Yoshua Bengio. On the difficulty of training recurrent
neural networks. ICML (3), 28:1310–1318, 2013b.
Razvan Pascanu, Yann N Dauphin, Surya Ganguli, and Yoshua Bengio. On the saddle point
problem for non-convex optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.4604, 2014.
Bryan A Plummer, Liwei Wang, Chris M Cervantes, Juan C Caicedo, Julia Hockenmaier,
and Svetlana Lazebnik. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences
for richer image-to-sentence models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference
on Computer Vision, pages 2641–2649, 2015.
Tomaso Poggio and Thomas Serre. Models of visual cortex. Scholarpedia, 8(4):3516, 2013.
Christopher Poultney, Sumit Chopra, Yann L Cun, et al. Efficient learning of sparse representations with an energy-based model. In Advances in neural information processing
systems, pages 1137–1144, 2006.
Jose C Principe, Neil R Euliano, and W Curt Lefebvre. Neural and adaptive systems:
fundamentals through simulations with CD-ROM. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999.
Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards realtime object detection with region proposal networks. In Advances in neural information
processing systems, pages 91–99, 2015.
Martin Riedmiller and Heinrich Braun. A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: The rprop algorithm. In Neural Networks, 1993., IEEE International
Conference On, pages 586–591. IEEE, 1993.
69
Wang and Raj
AJ Robinson and Frank Fallside. The utility driven dynamic error propagation network.
University of Cambridge Department of Engineering, 1987.
Frank Rosenblatt. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65(6):386, 1958.
David E Rumelhart, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Ronald J Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1985.
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla, Michael Bernstein, et al. Imagenet large
scale visual recognition challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 115(3):
211–252, 2015.
S Rasoul Safavian and David Landgrebe. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology.
1990.
Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Geoffrey E Hinton. Deep boltzmann machines. In AISTATS,
volume 1, page 3, 2009.
Tim Salimans, Ian Goodfellow, Wojciech Zaremba, Vicki Cheung, Alec Radford, and
Xi Chen. Improved techniques for training gans. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 2226–2234, 2016.
Jürgen Schmidhuber. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks,
61:85–117, 2015.
Mike Schuster and Kuldip K Paliwal. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 45(11):2673–2681, 1997.
Thomas Serre, Lior Wolf, and Tomaso Poggio. Object recognition with features inspired
by visual cortex. In 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05), volume 2, pages 994–1000. IEEE, 2005.
Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-ofexperts layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538, 2017.
Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale
image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556, 2014.
Paul Smolensky. Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony
theory. Technical report, DTIC Document, 1986.
Kihyuk Sohn, Honglak Lee, and Xinchen Yan. Learning structured output representation
using deep conditional generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, pages 3483–3491, 2015.
Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey E Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. Journal of
Machine Learning Research, 15(1):1929–1958, 2014.
70
On the Origin of Deep Learning
Amos Storkey. Increasing the capacity of a hopfield network without sacrificing functionality.
In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pages 451–456. Springer, 1997.
Richard S Sutton, David A McAllester, Satinder P Singh, Yishay Mansour, et al. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In NIPS,
volume 99, pages 1057–1063, 1999.
Christian Szegedy, Wojciech Zaremba, Ilya Sutskever, Joan Bruna, Dumitru Erhan, Ian
Goodfellow, and Rob Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural networks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1312.6199, 2013.
Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir
Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. Going deeper
with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1–9, 2015.
Aaron van den Oord, Nal Kalchbrenner, Lasse Espeholt, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, et al.
Conditional image generation with pixelcnn decoders. In Advances In Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 4790–4798, 2016.
Andreas Veit, Michael J Wilber, and Serge Belongie. Residual networks behave like ensembles of relatively shallow networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, pages 550–558, 2016.
Pascal Vincent, Hugo Larochelle, Isabelle Lajoie, Yoshua Bengio, and Pierre-Antoine Manzagol. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network
with a local denoising criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(Dec):3371–
3408, 2010.
Martin J Wainwright, Michael I Jordan, et al. Graphical models, exponential families,
and variational inference. Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning, 1(1–2):1–305,
2008.
Brian A Wandell. Foundations of vision. Sinauer Associates, 1995.
Haohan Wang and Jingkang Yang. Multiple confounders correction with regularized linear
mixed effect models, with application in biological processes. 2016.
Haohan Wang, Aaksha Meghawat, Louis-Philippe Morency, and Eric P Xing. Select-additive
learning: Improving cross-individual generalization in multimodal sentiment analysis.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05244, 2016.
Paul J Werbos. Generalization of backpropagation with application to a recurrent gas
market model. Neural Networks, 1(4):339–356, 1988.
Paul J Werbos. Backpropagation through time: what it does and how to do it. Proceedings
of the IEEE, 78(10):1550–1560, 1990.
Bernard Widrow et al. Adaptive” adaline” Neuron Using Chemical” memistors.”. 1960.
71
Wang and Raj
Alan L Wilkes and Nicholas J Wade. Bain on neural networks. Brain and cognition, 33(3):
295–305, 1997.
Gibbs J Willard. Elementary principles in statistical mechanics. The Rational Foundation of
Thermodynamics, New York, Charles Scribners sons and London, Edward Arnold, 1902.
Andrew G Wilson, Christoph Dann, Chris Lucas, and Eric P Xing. The human kernel. In
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 2854–2862, 2015.
SHI Xingjian, Zhourong Chen, Hao Wang, Dit-Yan Yeung, Wai-Kin Wong, and Wangchun Woo. Convolutional lstm network: A machine learning approach for precipitation
nowcasting. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 802–810, 2015.
Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Richard S Zemel, and Yoshua Bengio. Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption
generation with visual attention. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03044, 2(3):5, 2015.
Zhilin Yang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and William Cohen. Multi-task cross-lingual sequence
tagging from scratch. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.06270, 2016.
Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. Separating the polynomial-time hierarchy by oracles. In 26th Annual
Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1985), 1985.
Xin Yao. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9):1423–1447,
1999.
Dong Yu, Li Deng, and George Dahl. Roles of pre-training and fine-tuning in contextdependent dbn-hmms for real-world speech recognition. In Proc. NIPS Workshop on
Deep Learning and Unsupervised Feature Learning, 2010.
Sergey Zagoruyko and Nikos Komodakis.
arXiv:1605.07146, 2016.
Matthew D Zeiler. Adadelta:
arXiv:1212.5701, 2012.
Wide residual networks.
arXiv preprint
an adaptive learning rate method.
arXiv preprint
Chiyuan Zhang, Samy Bengio, Moritz Hardt, Benjamin Recht, and Oriol Vinyals.
Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization.
arXiv preprint
arXiv:1611.03530, 2016a.
Ke Zhang, Miao Sun, Tony X Han, Xingfang Yuan, Liru Guo, and Tao Liu. Residual networks of residual networks: Multilevel residual networks. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1608.02908, 2016b.
Junbo Zhao, Michael Mathieu, and Yann LeCun. Energy-based generative adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03126, 2016.
Xiang Zhou and Matthew Stephens. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nature genetics, 44(7):821–824, 2012.
72
| 9cs.NE
|
An evolutionary approach to the identification of
Cellular Automata based on partial observations
Witold Bołt†∗ , Jan M. Baetens∗ and Bernard De Baets∗
† Systems
arXiv:1508.05752v1 [cs.NE] 24 Aug 2015
∗ KERMIT,
Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
Department of Mathematical Modelling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Abstract—In this paper we consider the identification problem
of Cellular Automata (CAs). The problem is defined and solved
in the context of partial observations with time gaps of unknown
length, i.e. pre-recorded, partial configurations of the system at
certain, unknown time steps. A solution method based on a
modified variant of a Genetic Algorithm (GA) is proposed and
illustrated with brief experimental results.
I.
I NTRODUCTION
CAs present an attractive and effective modelling technique
for a variety of problems. In order to use CAs in a practical
modelling task, one needs to understand the underlying rules,
relevant to the given phenomenon, and translate them into a
CA local rule. Additionally, the state space, tessellation and
neighborhood structure need to be pinned down beforehand.
This narrows the application area for CAs, since there are
problems for which it is hard to manually design a proper
local rule. In some cases only the initial and final states of
the system are known (e.g. [1]–[3]). Such problems motivate
the research on automated CA identification. Various methods
have been used, including genetic algorithms (GAs) [4]–[7],
genetic programming [8]–[10], gene expression programming
[11], ant intelligence [12], machine learning [13], as well as
direct search/construction approaches [14]–[17].
Existing methods can be divided into two main groups.
Firstly, methods for solving specific, global problems. An
example of such a problem is majority classification in which
one only knows the initial condition and the desired outcome.
Secondly, methods that exploit the entire time series of configurations, where it is assumed that all configurations are known.
Only limited research efforts have been devoted to problems
involving identification based on partial information [4].
The main goal of the research presented in this paper is
to develop methods capable of automated CA identification in
case of partial information. The paper is organized as follows.
In Section II we start with introducing basic definitions and
presenting some well-known facts on CAs. Section III holds
the formal definition of the CA identification problem, while
in Section IV we reformulate this problem as an optimization
task. In Section V the evolutionary algorithm for solving the
identification problem is presented. The paper is concluded
by Section VI which presents initial results of computational
experiments.
An introduction to the methods presented in this paper, and
a simpler formulation of the discussed algorithm can be found
in [18].
978-1-4799-7492-4/15/$31.00
c 2015 IEEE
II.
P RELIMINARIES
We start by defining a CA. In this paper we will concentrate
on 1D, deterministic CAs with a symmetric neighborhood.
Let r ∈ N and fA : {0, 1}2 r+1 → {0, 1} be any
function, then for N > 0 we define the N –cell global CA
rule AN : {0, 1}N → {0, 1}N as:
AN (. . . , si , . . .) = (. . . , fA (si−r , . . . , si+r ), . . .),
(1)
using periodic boundary conditions, i.e. for any i ∈ Z it holds
that si+N = si .
The function fA used in this definition will be referred to
as a local rule, and the integer r will be referred to as the
radius of the neighborhood. Any local rule can be uniquely
defined by a lookup table (LUT) that lists all of the possible
arguments together with the corresponding function values. It
is assumed that the arguments are listed in a lexicographic
order. The general form of such a LUT in the case of radius
r = 1 is shown in Table I.
TABLE I.
LUT OF LOCAL RULE R = (l8 , l7 , l6 , l5 , l4 , l3 , l2 , l1 )2
111
110
101
100
011
010
001
000
l8
l7
l6
l5
l4
l3
l2
l1
The LUT can be used to enumerate local rules, as the coefficients li can be treated as
P8digits in the binary representation
of an integer R, i.e. R = i=1 li 2i−1 . Clearly this extends to
higher values of the radius. Due to the fact that the ordering
of arguments in the LUT is fixed, only the second row needs
to be stored, such that a LUT may be represented as a binary
vector. The length of such a vector is 22 r+1 .
With {0, 1}∗ we will denote the
S set of all binary sequences
of finite length, i.e. {0, 1}∗ = N >0 {0, 1}N . The function
A : {0, 1}∗ → {0, 1}∗ , satisfying A(X) = AN (X) if and only
if X ∈ {0, 1}N , where each of the global rules AN is defined
with the same local rule fA , will be referred to as a generalized
global rule of a CA. Such functions will be frequently used
throughout this paper, therefore we will simply refer to them
as global rules or rules. In this paper a CA will be identified in
terms of its global rule, and by referring to a CA we therefore
always refer to its global rule in this generalized sense.
Note that rule A is uniquely defined by a given local
rule fA , but the opposite is not true. For a given rule A we
may find different local rules defining it. Fact 1 highlights
the relationship between different local rules defining the
same CA.
Fact 1. Two local rules f : {0, 1}2 r+1 → {0, 1} and
g : {0, 1}2 u+1 → {0, 1}, u ≤ r, define the same CA if and
only if it holds:
f (s1 , . . . , s2 r+1 ) = g(sr−u+1 , . . . , sr+u+1 ),
2 r+1
for any (s1 , . . . , s2 r+1 ) ∈ {0, 1}
(2)
.
Example 1. Let g : {0, 1} → {0, 1} be defined by g(s) = s
and f : {0, 1}3 → {0, 1} be defined by f (s1 , s2 , s3 ) = s2 s3 +
s2 (1 − s3 ). We can see that for any s1 , s3 ∈ {0, 1} it holds
that f (s1 , s2 , s3 ) = g(s2 ) = s2 , and thus f and g define the
same CA rule, which happens to be the identity rule.
For a given neighborhood radius r, Ar denotes the set of
all CAs that can be expressed with the use of a local rule with
a neighborhood of radius r. CAs belonging to A1 are referred
to as Elementary CAs (ECAs), and form the most commonly
studied class of 2–state CAs [19].
Fig. 1.
Space-time diagram of ECA 150
Two important properties of the sets Ar are underlined in
Fact 2.
2 r+1
Fact 2. For any r ≥ 0, Ar ⊂ Ar+1 and |Ar | = 22
.
Let A be a CA, X ∈ {0, 1}M for some M and T > 0.
The finite sequence of vectors given by:
(X, A(X), A2 (X)), . . . , AT −1 (X)),
where At denotes the t–th application of the rule A, will be
referred to as the space-time diagram containing T time steps.
Each of the elements of a space-time diagram will be referred
to as a configuration of the CA, while the first element will be
referred to as the initial configuration. If t = 0, 1, . . . , T − 1
and m = 1, . . . , M , then At (X)[m] refers to the state of the
m–th cell in the t–th element of the space-time diagram.
Example 2. We consider an ECA defined by local rule 150.
The LUT of ECA 150 is shown in Table II.
TABLE II.
LUT OF ECA 150
111
110
101
100
011
010
001
000
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
Figure 1 depicts a space-time diagram of ECA 150, starting
from a random initial configuration. Following a common
convention, the space-time diagram is visualized as a bitmap in
which every row corresponds to a configuration at specific time
step. The first row in the image is the initial configuration. State
one is drawn as a black pixel, while white pixel corresponds
to state zero.
III.
P ROBLEM STATEMENT
belonging to the set {0, 1}. Additionally, let the first row I[1] ∈
{0, 1}M . Such an array I will be referred to as an observation.
If an observation I does not contain the symbol ?, we refer to it
as spatially complete. The first row I[1] is assumed to represent
the initial configuration of a CA, and row I[n] for n > 1
represents the configuration at time step τn . It is assumed that
τn < τn+1 .
Let I be an observation. The number C(I) = #{I[n, m] 6=
?} will be referred to as the number of completely observed
states. In our case, for any observation I it holds that C(I) > 0.
For each observation I, we define the set com(I) that
contains all of the spatially complete observations I 0 , satisfying
I 0 [n, m] = I[n, m] for all n, m such that I[n, m] 6= ?.
Example 3. Let observation I be given by:
0
I= 0
1
Then the set com(I) is
0 1
0 0
com(I) =
1 1
1
?
1
0
1 .
?
given by:
0
0 1 0
1 , 0 0 1 ,
0
1 1 1
0 1 0
0 1 0
0 1 1 , 0 1 1
.
1 1 0
1 1 1
As can be easily counted, C(I) = 7.
In this section we define the identification problem. The
formulation presented below is based on the concept of an
observation of a space-time diagram, which is assumed to
be incomplete, i.e. it contains only partial information on the
states of the CA.
We will say that a CA A fits the observation I if and only if
there exists an I 0 ∈ com(I) and a sequence of natural numbers
(τn ) such that τn < τn+1 and for any n ∈ {1, 2, . . . , N − 1}
it holds:
Aτn (I 0 [1]) = I 0 [n + 1].
(3)
Formally, we assume that the states of a system, which
is assumed to be an unknown CA, were observed at certain,
unknown time steps. Let I be an N × M array containing
symbols belonging to the set {0, 1, ?}, where the symbols 0
and 1 denote valid states, while ? denotes an unknown state
Proposition 3. Rule A fits the observation I if and only if there
exist an I 0 ∈ com(I) and a sequence of natural numbers (tn )
such that tn ≤ tn+1 and for any n ∈ {1, 2, . . . , N − 1} it
holds:
Atn (I 0 [n]) = I 0 [n + 1].
(4)
The sequence (τn ) in the definition of fitting, corresponds
to the time steps in the CA evolution (which are assigned
to the rows of the observation), while the sequence (tn ) in
Proposition 3 refers to the number of missing time frames
between two P
consecutive rows in the observed diagram. Obn
viously τn = i=1 ti .
In practice, it is useful to be able to use more than one
observation for the identification. Therefore, we will consider
observation sets I containing a finite number of observations.
For simplicity, we assume that the elements of I are numbered,
i.e. I = {I1 , . . . , I|I| }. We will say that rule A fits the
observation set I, if it fits all of the observations in the set.
Note that for the sake of simplicity we will write C(I) to
express the number of observed
P states in all of the observations
belonging to I, i.e. C(I) = I∈I C(I). Additionally, we will
write M (I) to denote the total number of columns
in all of
P
the observations belonging to I, i.e. M (I) = I∈I MI where
MI is the number of columns of observation I.
For a non-empty observation set I, the set R(I) will
denote all CA rules that fit the observation set I. The identification problem is defined as finding the elements of the
set R(I) based on I. In practice, our goal will be limited to
finding at least one of the elements of R(I) ∩ Ar for some
r > 0. The problem can also be seen from the machine learning
perspective in which the observation set is a training set, from
which we try to learn and build a set of rules based on this
knowledge.
The following fact will be used in the design of the
identification algorithm, to simplify calculations. Informally,
it could be expressed by understanding the observation set I
as a set of conditions that the rule needs to meet. Having fewer
conditions, it becomes more likely to find solutions meeting
those conditions.
Fact 4. Let I be an observation set, and let I 0 ⊂ I. Then
R(I) ⊂ R(I 0 ).
Since we consider only finite observation sets, we know
that for every observation set I there exists a T > 0 such
that, if a solution exists, and (tIn ) is the time gap sequence
of observation I ∈ I, then 1 ≤ tIn ≤ T , for every n. In the
construction of the solution algorithm, we will assume that an
upper-bound for T is known.
IV.
CA I DENTIFICATION AS AN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM
The identification problem, defined in Section III, can be
formulated as an optimization problem, which in turn enables
the use of evolutionary search methods.
We start with an auxiliary definition. Let a, b ∈ {0, 1, ?}M
be some vectors. We define the distance between a and b as:
X
dist(a, b) =
|ai − bi |.
(5)
ai ,bi ∈{0,1}
We assume that if there is no i such that ai 6= ? and bi 6= ?
then dist(a, b) = 0. Therefore dist(a, b) = 0 6⇒ a = b.
Assume that I is a set of observations of some unknown
CA belonging to Ar , i.e. R(I) ∪ Ar 6= ∅. Let A be a CA, and
for every I ∈ I, let (τnI ) be a strictly increasing sequence of
natural numbers.
As a start, we define the error measure EI (A, (τiI )), which
measures how well a given CA A fits the observation set I,
assuming that τiI is the time step of the i–th row in observation
I. The measure EI is defined as:
EI (A, (τiI )) =
I −1
X NX
I
dist(Aτn (I[1]), I[n + 1]),
(6)
I∈I n=1
where NI is the number of rows of observation I ∈ I. The
following fact is an direct consequence of the definition of the
identification problem.
Fact 5. A ∈ R(I) if and only if there exists a sequence (τiI )
such that EI (A, (τiI )) = 0.
Note that in the case when I = {I} we will write EI
instead of E{I} .
Let (ti ) be a sequence of natural numbers, and let A be a
A
CA rule. Observation I¯(t
defined as:
i)
(
I[n, m],
if I[n, m] 6= ?,
A
I¯(t
[n, m] =
A
i)
Atn−1 (I¯(t
[n
−
1])[m],
if
I[n, m] = ?,
i)
will be referred to as the A–completion of I with time gaps
A
(ti ). Note that any observation I satisfies I[1] = I¯(t
[1] for
i)
any A, (ti ).
Fact 6. I¯A ∈ com(I).
(ti )
Example 4. Assume that CA A is ECA 150 with LUT given by
Table II and local rule f150 . Let (ti )2i=1 = (1, 2). We consider
A
the observation I defined in Example 3 and compute I¯(t
.
i)
0
I= 0
1
1
?
1
0
1
?
0 1 0
A
0 1 1
I¯(t
=
)
i
1 1 0
A
The calculation is as follows. Firstly we compute I¯(t
[2, 2].
i)
Since t1 = 1 we simply apply the rule to the first row of
A
I, i.e. I¯(t
[2, 2] = f150 (I[1, 1], I[1, 2], I[1, 3]) = 1. Since
i)
A
t2 = 2, to find I¯(t
[3, 3], we first need to compute one
i)
additional configuration by evaluating the rule on configuration
A
A
I¯(t
[2]. It is easy to check that A(I¯(t
[2]) = (0, 0, 0), and thus
i)
i)
A
I¯(ti ) [3, 3] = f150 (0, 0, 0) = 0.
Based on Proposition 3, we define an alternative error
eI (A, (tI )) that will turn out to be more useful in
measure E
i
the construction of the solution algorithm. Assuming that (tIi )
eI
is a sequence of natural numbers representing time gaps, E
is defined as:
I −1
I
X NX
A
A
eI (A, (tIi )) =
¯
E
dist Atn I¯(t
I ) [n] , I(tI ) [n + 1] .
i
i
I∈I n=1
(7)
A
eI without using the
Since I¯(t
∈
com(I),
we
can
express
E
i)
function dist as:
eI (A, (tIi )) =
E
I −1
X NX
I
A
¯A
|Atn I¯(t
I ) [n] − I(tI ) [n + 1]|.
i
I∈I n=1
i
(8)
Example 5. We refer again to observation I, CA A and (ti )
used in Example 4 and we compute the error measuresPEI and
eI . Let us start with EI . Following the fact that τn = n ti ,
E
i=1
we get (τi ) = (1, 3). The error measure EI can be computed
easily by evolving A, starting from the initial configuration
I[1] and comparing the results with the values in I, for entries
not occupied by ?.
Starting from the top: A(I[1]) = (1, 1, 1). Since τ1 = 1 we
compare the outcome with the second row of I. As we see,
I[2, 1] = 0 6= 1 has an incorrect value, I[2, 2] =? so it does
not contribute to the error and I[2, 3] = 1 which is a correct
value. Since τ2 = 3 we should further evolve A three times,
starting from A(I[1]), but since A((1, 1, 1)) = (1, 1, 1), we
can simply compare I[3] with (1, 1, 1) and see that no errors
occur. Summing up, the total error is: EI (A, (τi )) = 1.
T NI −1 possibilities, which holds a substantial computational
burden. Due to this, even in the case of partial observations,
we follow the approach described above and treat the time
steps independently. The only difference that we introduce
is that if for given n, few different candidate values for tIn
lead to the same, minimal value of the pairwise error, one of
those candidates is being selected randomly. Such an approach,
is a stochastic overestimation of the error, i.e. the calculated
value will never be lower than the actual error. Additionally,
if a given CA is a solution to the problem, recalculating
the approximate error measure multiple times increases the
probability of finding the exact value, which is found by taking
the minimum of all of the obtained results. Such an approach
turned out to be sufficient in the discussed context.
V.
E VOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM
eI , by taking pairs of rows
Similarly, we find the value of E
A
A
I¯(t
[n]
and
I[n+1]
and
comparing
the results of Atn (I¯(t
[n])
i)
i)
and I[n + 1]. The error in the first pair of rows is the same as
in the case of EI . For the second pair the initial condition is
A
I¯(t
[2] = (0, 1, 1), and since A(0, 1, 1) = (0, 0, 0) and since
i)
A((0, 0, 0)) = (0, 0, 0), we do not further evaluate A. We
compare (0, 0, 0) with I[3], which yields 2 incorrect values.
eI (A, (ti )) = 3.
Summing up, the total error is E
Having stated the identification problem as an optimization
problem in this section, we describe its solution using an
evolutionary algorithm based on the classical GA. In order
to follow the GA approach, we need to define the individuals’
representation, the population structure, a fitness function for
ranking the individuals, but also the selection procedure for
reproduction, and finally the cross-over and mutation operators.
Formally, also halting conditions need to be formulated.
eI is expressed by the
The relation between EI and E
following proposition.
A. Representation of individuals and population structure
Proposition 7. Let A be a CA rule and I an observation
set. There exists a strictly increasing sequence (τiI ) of natural
numbers, such that EI (A, (τiI )) = 0 if and only if there exists
eI (A, (tI )) = 0.
a sequence (tIi ) of natural numbers such that E
i
As a consequence of Proposition 7, the identification problem can be expressed mathematically as the minimization of
e Note that this is only possible due to the assumption that
E.
observation set I contains partial space-time diagrams of some
unknown CA. In a more general setting, where the observations
could have a more complex origin, such a simplification is not
possible.
As mentioned earlier, we consider the case where the upper
bound for the time gaps is known. Using this knowledge, we
eI independently of the selection of
define the error measure E
(tIi ) as:
eI (A) = min E
eI (A, (tIi )).
E
(9)
(tIi )
1≤tIi ≤T
Note that the minimum in (9) is always defined, since
there is a finite number of possibilities for the choice of tIn .
Additionally, note that for a spatially complete observation I,
the choice of tIn is independent of the choice of tIm for any
n 6= m, and for observations I and J, the choice of (tIi ) is
independent from the choice of (tJi ). Consequently, to find the
eI in the case of a spatially complete observation
value of E
P
set, we need to examine at most I∈I T (NI − 1) sequences
of time gap lengths.
(tIi )
In the general case, the choices of the values of
are
dependent on each other, and thus in order to find the exact
value of the error measure we need to examine all of the
Here, the individuals that make up the population are CAs,
encoded through the LUT of their local rules, which is possible
since the LUT of any CA A ∈ Ar can be represented as a bitstring of length 22 r+1 . We assume that the population consists
of CA belonging to Ar , for some r > 0.
We consider populations of P > 0 individuals. By P i we
denote the population of the i–th generation of the GA. The
population P 1 is the initial population, and is constructed by
randomly selecting P bit-strings. Populations P i for i > 1 are
the outcomes of applying the genetic operators, according to
the rules described in the remainder of this section.
B. Fitness function
The fitness function is directly related to the error measure
eI defined by (9). Although Proposition 7 states that the
E
error measures given by (6) and (9) can be used interchangeably, preliminary experiments showed that the later results in
efficient and convergent algorithm, while suboptimal results
were obtained using the measure given by (6). This follows
from the fact that the error in row n is affected by errors
appearing in rows 2, . . . , n − 1. As we know from the research
on dynamical properties of CAs, small initial perturbations can
strongly affect the final system state [20]. For that reason, it
eI with a GA as compared to EI .
is easier to optimize E
2 r+1
be a LUT of some local rule which
Let L ∈ {0, 1}2
defines a CA A. Then fitI (L) denotes the fitness of A, and is
defined as:
eI (A).
fitI (L) = C(I) − M (I) − E
(10)
The fitness function takes integer values from 0 up to C(I) −
M (I), i.e. there are finitely many possible values of the fitness
function. The goal of the GA is to maximize fitness, and a CA
with a maximal fitness value is a solution of the identification
problem. From the above, it is clear that if C(I) − M (I)
is close to zero, solving the problem is infeasible, since the
number of possible values is very small and the population
is not able to gradually increase its fitness. Additionally, if
C(I) = M (I), then the problem is trivial because every CA
is a solution.
The fitness defined by (10) has proven to work effectively,
but the computing time needed for its evolution becomes
unacceptable if the observation set is large. Therefore, during
the evolution, to estimate the value of fitI we use fitI 0 for
some non-empty subset I 0 ⊂ I. We start by randomly selecting
elements for the subset I 0 . Subsequently, but before evolving
a new population we replace one of the elements in the subset
I 0 with a randomly selected observation from I. Due to Fact 4
we are sure that such an approach does not result in reducing
the solution set.
C. Selection operator
Having defined the fitness function, we can define the
selection operator, which is responsible for selecting the parent
individuals that will be used to produce the next generation. We
use a random selection method where the selection probability
of a given individual is proportional to its fitness. Individuals
are selected with replacement, i.e. individuals might be selected multiple times for reproduction.
G. Halting conditions
The algorithm evolves by generating populations according
to the procedure described above until a maximum, predefined
number of populations Λ was evolved or, if a CA that fits the
observation set was discovered.
As mentioned in Subsection V-B during the evolution, the
fitness fitI is approximated by fitI 0 for some I 0 ( I, which
is effective for selection, but can not be used in the halting
condition since fitI 0 (A) = C(I 0 ) − M (I 0 ) does not imply
fitI (A) = C(I) − M (I). Therefore, for the individual A with
the highest value fitI 0 (A), we additionally calculate fitI (A)
and base the halting condition on it, i.e. the algorithm stops as
soon an element is found.
VI.
R ESULTS OF EXPERIMENTS
By means of our experiments we verified to what extent
the partiality of observations affects the efficiency of the GA
in terms of the number of GA iterations required to find a
solution.
We concentrated on two ECAs: 150 and 180, with LUTs
given in Table II and III, respectively.
TABLE III.
LUT OF ECA 180
111
110
101
100
011
010
001
000
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
D. Cross-over operator
To produce offspring, we select two parents according to
the procedure described in Subsection V-C. A uniform crossover operator is used, i.e. if L1 , L2 denote parents, the outcome
of the cross-over operator is a vector Lc with values that are
randomly selected from L1 and L2 , i.e. P(Lc [i] = L1 [i]) =
P(Lc [i] = L2 [i]) = 0.5.
E. Mutation operator
Finally, the offspring individual is mutated. A simple bitflip mutation is being used, i.e. for every position of the
vector a decision is made whether or not the value should
be flipped, with pf being the probability of flipping the value.
The expected number of flipped positions in the population is
P pf 22 r+1 .
F. Elite survival
After evolving a new population, the elite survival procedure is applied. Our experiments proved that such an
approach is required to reach convergence. The procedure
is implemented by a deterministic selection of PE P
fittest individuals from the previous population used to replace
randomly selected individuals in the newly evolved one.
Including this elite survival process can dramatically increase the performance of the algorithm, though there are cases
where such an approach causes the population to progress
towards a local optimum. To overcome this, we apply a simple,
adaptive procedure that deactivates elite survival in cases
when the maximum fitness value of the population remained
constant for more than Noff generations. The elite survival
procedure is again switched on after a predefined number of
Non generations, or if the maximum fitness improved.
In this experiment, the GA evolution is based on observation sets IA (k) for k = {0, 1, . . . , 150} and ECA A ∈
{150, 180}. The integer k will be referred to as the problem
number. The observation set IA (0) is a set of Ω > 0 observations obtained from Ω different, random initial conditions
common for both A, by selecting subsequent configurations
of ECA A generating time gaps of random length from 1
to T . The set IA (k) for k > 0 is built from observations
belonging to IA (k − 1) by modifying them in such a way
that π = 2000 randomly selected, completely observed entries
are replaced by “?”. In other words, by increasing k the
effect of spatial partiality is increased. As a result of such
150 a
procedure we obtained a series of observation sets IA (k) k=0 ,
for which it holds C(IA (k)) − C(IA (k + 1)) = π. The
identification algorithm was then executed for each of the
obtained observation sets.
Given that the family of ECAs contains only 256 members,
the identification problem would be relatively easy to tackle,
so we set the radius r = 2, i.e. the population contains local
rules with radius r = 2 represented as bit-strings of length
32. Without this modification the algorithm is able to find a
solution in a few iterations, by examining the entire search
space.
In order to account for the stochastic nature of the GA,
the experiment is repeated L > 0 times for each r, k. The
values of of the GA parameters used in our experiment setup
are shown in Table IV.
The results vary significantly depending on the rule in
question, which is not surprising since the dynamics of ECAs
150 and 180 is different. The normalized Maximum Lyapunov
Exponent (nMLE) [21]–[23] of the former is the highest among
param
r
pf
P
PE
T
C
Ω
π
s
Λ
L
value
2
0.01
512
32
10
69
64
2000
8
5000
20
PARAMETERS USED IN THE EXPERIMENT
description
rule radius
probability of flipping 1-bit in mutation
number of individuals in population
elite size
bound for the time gap length
number of rows / columns in each observation
number of observations
number of cells being removed from each observation set
number of samples for fitness approximation
maximal number of the GA populations
number of repetitions of the GA per rule
no. of successful GA executions
TABLE IV.
20
15
10
5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100 110 120 130 140 150
problem number k
no. of successful GA executions
(a) ECA 150
20
15
10
5
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100 110 120 130 140 150
problem number k
(b) ECA 180
Fig. 3.
Fig. 2.
Number of successful GA executions
Space-time diagram of ECA 180
all of the ECAs, and thereby this CA’s behavior may be
considered complex. In contrast, the nMLE of ECA 180 is
only approximately 0.48, which hints that, in some sense, the
behavior of this ECA is simpler than the one displayed by ECA
150. The differences in the overall dynamical complexity of
these two CAs can be acknowledged by examining their spacetime diagrams, which are depicted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2.
To understand the performance of the GA, we first checked
for which k the algorithm was able to find a solution (Fig.
3). When comparing the plot for ECA 150 with the one for
ECA 180, it is clear that the identification problem turned out
to be much more challenging for ECA 150. Indeed, for this
ECA, the algorithm was effective only if the number removed
observation elements was smaller than 50 π, whereas it mostly
failed when more spatial partiality was added. Besides, even
for k close to 0, not all of the GA executions were successful.
In contrast, identifying ECA 180 was always possible for k <
120, but for k > 120 we see a sudden drop in the performance.
Note that in both cases, for k = 150 a solution was easily
found, since for this setting the problem is trivial, i.e. almost
all CAs can be considered a solution.
The above results suggest that, depending on the dynamical
characteristics of the CA in question, the maximum allowable
number of missing elements in the observations differs. Further
research is undertaken to better understand the link between
the identifiability and dynamics of CAs.
Figure 4 depict the minimum, average and maximum
number of GA iterations among the runs resulting in a solution
for ECA 150 and ECA 180, respectively. In the case of ECA
180, we see that the efforts needed for finding a solution grows
as k increases, up to the point where it becomes impossible.
Furthermore, we see that in most cases the difference between
maximal and minimal values is relatively low. In the case of
ECA 150, the results are much less stable. The differences
between maximal and minimal values are substantial, and the
efforts needed to find the solution do not steadily grows with
the growing spatial partiality. The only similarity between the
two CAs seems to be in the fact that there exists some critical
k beyond which the problem becomes impossible to solve.
S UMMARY
In this paper we introduced the identification problem of
CAs in the context of partial observations. An evolutionary
algorithm for tackling the problem was presented, and its
performance was verified for the two ECAs. The initial experiments suggest that the difficulty of the identification problem is
somehow linked to the dynamical complexity of the CAs. The
problem and solution algorithm presented in this paper, should
be considered as one of the first steps in identifying CAs from
data originating from real-world phenomenon observations.
Unavoidably, such observations will be somehow incomplete
in the sense that it is impossible to continuously track the
involved processes.
R EFERENCES
[1]
S. Al-Kheder, J. Wang, and J. Shan, “Cellular automata urban growth
model calibration with genetic algorithms,” in Proc. Urban Remote
Sensing Joint Event, 2007. IEEE, 2007, pp. 1–5.
[2] E. Sapin, L. Bull, and A. Adamatzky, “Genetic approaches to search for
computing patterns in cellular automata,” IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag.,
vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 20–28, 2009.
number of GA iterations
10000
min
avg
max
1000
[8]
[9]
100
[10]
10
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100 110 120 130 140 150
problem number k
[11]
(a) ECA 150
[12]
number of GA iterations
10000
min
avg
max
1000
[13]
[14]
100
[15]
10
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90 100 110 120 130 140 150
[16]
problem number k
(b) ECA 180
Fig. 4.
[17]
Number of GA iterations required to find a solution
[18]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
P. L. Rosin, “Image processing using 3-state cellular automata,” Comput. Vis. Image Underst., vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 790–802, 2010.
F. C. Richards, T. P. Meyer, and N. H. Packard, “Extracting cellular
automaton rules directly from experimental data,” Physica D: Nonlinear
Phenomena, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 189–202, 1990.
M. Mitchell, J. P. Crutchfield, and R. Das, “Evolving cellular automata
with genetic algorithms: A review of recent work,” in Proceedings of
the First International Conference on Evolutionary Computation and
its Applications (EvCA’96), 1996.
T. Bäck, R. Breukelaar, and L. Willmes, “Inverse Design of Cellular
Automata by Genetic Algorithms: An Unconventional Programming
Paradigm,” in Unconventional Programming Paradigms, ser. Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, J.-P. Banâtre, P. Fradet, J.-L. Giavitto, and
O. Michel, Eds. Springer-Verlag, 2005, vol. 3566, pp. 161–172.
E. Sapin, O. Bailleux, and J.-J. Chabrier, “Research of a cellular
automaton simulating logic gates by evolutionary algorithms,” in Proceedings of the 6th European conference on Genetic programming, ser.
EuroGP’03. Springer-Verlag, 2003, pp. 414–423.
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
S. Bandini, S. Manzoni, and L. Vanneschi, “Evolving robust cellular
automata rules with genetic programming.” in Automata, A. Adamatzky,
R. Alonso-Sanz, A. T. Lawniczak, G. J. Martı́nez, K. Morita, and
T. Worsch, Eds. Luniver Press, Frome, UK, 2008, pp. 542–556.
K. Maeda and C. Sakama, “Identifying cellular automata rules,” J.
Cellular Automata, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2007.
D. Andre, F. H. Bennett III, and J. R. Koza, “Discovery by genetic
programming of a cellular automata rule that is better than any known
rule for the majority classification problem,” in Proceedings of the First
Annual Conference on Genetic Programming. MIT Press, 1996, pp.
3–11.
C. Ferreira, “Gene expression programming: a new adaptive algorithm
for solving problems,” Complex Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 87–129,
2001.
X. Liu, X. Li, L. Liu, J. He, and B. Ai, “A bottom-up approach to
discover transition rules of cellular automata using ant intelligence,”
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., vol. 22, no. 11-12, pp. 1247–1269, 2008.
L. Bull and A. Adamatzky, “A learning classifier system approach to
the identification of cellular automata,” J. Cellular Automata, vol. 2,
no. 1, pp. 21–38, 2007.
A. Adamatzky, Identification Of Cellular Automata. Taylor & Francis
Group, 1994.
Y. Yang and S. A. Billings, “Extracting Boolean rules from CA
patterns.” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 573–
580, 2000.
——, “Neighborhood detection and rule selection from cellular automata patterns,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, vol. 30, no. 6,
pp. 840–847, 2000.
X. Sun, P. L. Rosin, and R. R. Martin, “Fast rule identification and
neighborhood selection for cellular automata,” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man,
Cybern. B, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 749–760, 2011.
W. Bołt, J. M. Baetens, and B. De Baets, “Identifying CAs with
evolutionary algorithms,” in Proceedings 19th International Workshop
on Cellular Automata and Discrete Complex Systems (AUTOMATA
2013) – Exploratory Papers, September 2013, pp. 11–20.
S. Wolfram, “Statistical mechanics of cellular automata,” Rev. Mod.
Phys., vol. 55, pp. 601–644, Jul 1983.
J. M. Baetens and B. De Baets, “Phenomenological study of irregular
cellular automata based on Lyapunov exponents and Jacobians,” Chaos:
An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 20, no. 3, 2010.
S. Wolfram, “Universality and complexity in cellular automata,” Physica
D, vol. 10, pp. 1–35, 1984.
M. Shereshevsky, “Lyapunov exponents for one-dimensional cellular
automata,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 1992.
F. Bagnoli, R. Rechtman, and S. Ruffo, “Damage spreading and
Lyapunov exponents in cellular automata,” Physics Letters A, vol. 172,
no. 1-2, pp. 34–38, Dec. 1992.
| 9cs.NE
|
The Cross-Quantilogram: Measuring Quantile
arXiv:1402.1937v2 [math.ST] 21 Jan 2018
Dependence and Testing Directional Predictability
between Time Series∗
Heejoon Han†
Oliver Linton‡
Tatsushi Oka§
Yoon-Jae Whang¶
March 14, 2016
Abstract
This paper proposes the cross-quantilogram to measure the quantile dependence
between two time series. We apply it to test the hypothesis that one time series has
no directional predictability to another time series. We establish the asymptotic distribution of the cross-quantilogram and the corresponding test statistic. The limiting
distributions depend on nuisance parameters. To construct consistent confidence intervals we employ a stationary bootstrap procedure; we establish consistency of this
bootstrap. Also, we consider a self-normalized approach, which yields an asymptotically pivotal statistic under the null hypothesis of no predictability. We provide simulation studies and two empirical applications. First, we use the cross-quantilogram to
detect predictability from stock variance to excess stock return. Compared to existing
tools used in the literature of stock return predictability, our method provides a more
complete relationship between a predictor and stock return. Second, we investigate the
systemic risk of individual financial institutions, such as JP Morgan Chase, Morgan
Stanley and AIG.
Keywords: Quantile, Correlogram, Dependence, Predictability, Systemic risk.
∗
We thank a Co-Editor, Jianqing Fan, an Associate Editor and three anonymous referees for constructive comments. Han’s work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF2013S1A5A8021502). Linton’s work was supported by Cambridge INET and the ERC. Oka’s work was
supported by Singapore Academic Research Fund (FY2013-FRC2-003). Whang’s work was supported by
the SNU Creative Leading Researcher Grant.
†
Department of Economics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
‡
Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
§
Department of Economics, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
¶
Department of Economics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
1
1
Introduction
Linton and Whang (2007) introduced the quantilogram to measure predictability in different
parts of the distribution of a stationary time series based on the correlogram of “quantile
hits”. They applied it to test the hypothesis that a given time series has no directional
predictability. More specifically, their null hypothesis was that the past information set of
the stationary time series {yt } does not improve the prediction about whether yt will be
above or below the unconditional quantile. The test is based on comparing the quantilogram to a pointwise confidence band. This contribution fits into a long literature of testing
predictability using signs or rank statistics, including the papers of Cowles and Jones (1937),
Dufour et al. (1998), and Christoffersen and Diebold (2002). The quantilogram has several
advantages compared to other test statistics for directional predictability. It is conceptually appealing and simple to interpret. Since the method is based on quantile hits it does
not require moment conditions like the ordinary correlogram and statistics like the variance
ratio that are derived from it, Mikosch and Starica (2000), and so it works well for heavy
tailed series. Many financial time series have heavy tails, see, e.g., Mandelbrot (1963), Fama
(1965), Rachev and Mittnik (2000), Embrechts et al. (1997), Ibragimov et al. (2009), and
Ibragimov (2009), and so this is an important consideration in practice. Additionally, this
type of method allows researchers to consider very long lags in comparison with regression
type methods, such as Engle and Manganelli (2004).
There have been a number of recent works either extending or applying this methodology. Davis and Mikosch (2009) have introduced the extremogram, which is essentially
the quantilogram for extreme quantiles, and Davis et al. (2012) has provided the inference
methods based on bootstrap and permutation for the extremogram. See also Davis et al.
(2013). Li (2008, 2012) has introduced a Fourier domain version of the quantilogram while
1
Hong (2000) has used a Fourier domain approach for test statistics based on distributions.
Further development in the Fourier domain approach has been made by Hagemann (2013)
and Dette et al. (2015). See also Li (2014) and Kley et al. (2016). The quantilogram has
recently been applied to stock returns and exchange rates, Laurini et al. (2008) and Chang
and Shie (2011).
Our paper addresses three outstanding issues with regard to the quantilogram. First,
the construction of confidence intervals that are valid under general dependence structures.
Linton and Whang (2007) derived the limiting distribution of the sample quantilogram under
the null hypothesis that the quantilogram itself is zero, in fact under a special case of that
where the process has a type of conditional heteroskedasticity structure. Even in that very
special case, the limiting distribution depends on model specific quantities. They derived a
bound on the asymptotic variance that allows one to test the null hypothesis of the absence of
predictability (or rather the special case of this that they work with). Even when this model
structure is appropriate, the bounds can be quite large especially when one looks into the
tails of the distribution. The quantilogram is also useful in cases where the null hypothesis of
no predictability is not thought to be true - one can be interested in measuring the degree of
predictability of a series across different quantiles. We provide a more complete solution to
the issue of inference for the quantilogram. Specifically, we derive the asymptotic distribution
of the quantilogram under general weak dependence conditions, specifically strong mixing.
The limiting distribution is quite complicated and depends on the long run variance of the
quantile hits. To conduct inference we propose the stationary bootstrap method of Politis
and Romano (1994) and prove that it provides asymptotically valid confidence intervals.
We investigate the finite sample performance of this procedure and show that it works well.
We also provide R code that carries out the computations efficiently.1 We also define a
self-normalized version of the statistic for testing the null hypothesis that the quantilogram
is zero, following Lobato (2001). This statistic has an asymptotically pivotal distribution,
1
This can be found at http://www.oliverlinton.me.uk/research/software.
2
under the null hypothesis, whose critical values have been tabulated so that there is no need
for long run variance estimation or even bootstrap.
Second, we develop our methodology inside a multivariate setting and explicitly consider
the cross-quantilogram. Linton and Whang (2007) briefly mentioned such a multivariate
version of the quantilogram but they provided neither theoretical results nor empirical results.
In fact, the cross-correlogram is a vitally important measure of dependence between time
series: Campbell, Lo, and MacKinlay (1997), for example, use the cross autocorrelation
function to describe lead lag relations between large stocks and small stocks. We apply the
cross-quantilogram to the study of stock return predictability; our method provides a more
complete picture of the predictability structure. We also apply the cross-quantilogram to
the question of systemic risk. Our theoretical results described in the previous paragraph
are all derived for the multivariate case.
Third, we explicitly allow the cross-quantilogram to be based on conditional (or regression) quantiles (Koenker and Basset, 1978). Using conditional quantiles rather than
unconditional quantiles, we measure directional dependence between two time-series after
parsimoniously controlling for the information at the time of prediction.2 Moreover, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the cross-quantilogram that are valid uniformly over a
range of quantiles.
The remainder of the paper is as follows: Section 2 introduces the cross-quantilogram
and Section 3 discusses its asymptotic properties. For consistent confidence intervals and
hypothesis tests, we define the bootstrap procedure and introduce the self normalized test
statistic. Section 4 considers the partial cross-quantilogram and gives a full treatment of its
behavior in large samples. In Section 5 we report results of some Monte Carlo simulations to
2
Our analysis includes the cross-quantilogram based on unconditional quantiles as a special case. In this
case, the cross-quantilogram is shown to be a functional of the empirical copula introduced by Ruschendorf
(1976) and Deheuvels (1979) as some nonparametric measures of dependence, such as Spearman’s rho and
Kendall’s tau. In this special case, the asymptotic results for the empirical copula, which are found in Stute
(1984), Fermanian et al. (2004) and Segers (2012) among others, can apply for the cross-quantilogram.
Generally, however, the cross-quantilogram here differs from the empirical copula process and needs different
treatment for analyzing its properties.
3
evaluate the finite sample properties of our procedures. In Section 6 we give two applications:
we investigate stock return predictability and system risk using our methodology. Appendix
contains all the proofs.
We use the following notation: The norm k · k denotes the Euclidean norm, i.e., kzk =
Pd
for z = (z1 , . . . , zd )⊤ ∈ Rd and the norm k · kp indicates the Lp norm of a d × 1
P
random vector z, given by kzkp = ( dj=1 E|zj |p )1/p for p > 0. Let 1[·] be the indicator
(
2 1/2
j=1 zj )
function taking the value one when its argument is true, and zero otherwise. We use R, Z
and N to denote the set of all real numbers, all integers and all positive integers, respectively.
Let Z+ = N ∪ {0}.
2
The Cross-Quantilogram
Let {(yt , xt ) : t ∈ Z} be a strictly stationary time series with yt = (y1t , y2t )⊤ ∈ R2 and
(1)
(d )
xt = (x1t , x2t ) ∈ Rd1 × Rd2 , where xit = [xit , . . . , xit i ]⊤ ∈ Rdi with di ∈ N for i = 1, 2. We
use Fyi |xi (·|xit ) to denote the conditional distribution function of the series yit given xit with
density function fyi |xi (·|xit ), and the corresponding conditional quantile function is defined as
qi,t (τi ) = inf{v : Fyi |xi (v|xit ) ≥ τi } for τi ∈ (0, 1), for i = 1, 2. Let T be the range of quantiles
we are interested in evaluating the directional predictability. For simplicity, we assume
that T is a Cartesian product of two closed intervals in (0, 1), that is T ≡ T1 × T2 , where
Ti = [τ i , τ i ] for some 0 < τ i < τ i < 1.3
We consider a measure of serial dependence between two events {y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )} and
{y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )} for an arbitrary pair of τ = (τ1 , τ2 )⊤ ∈ T and for an integer k. In the
literature, {1[yit ≤ qi,t (·)]} is called the quantile-hit or quantile-exceedance process for i =
1, 2. The cross-quantilogram is defined as the cross-correlation of the quantile-hit processes
3
E [ψτ1 (y1t − q1,t (τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q2,t−k (τ2 ))]
ρτ (k) = q
q
,
2
2
E ψτ1 (y1t − q1,t (τ1 )) E ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q2,t−k (τ2 ))
(1)
It is straightforward to extend the results to a more general case, e.g. the case for which T is the union
of a finite number of disjoint closed subsets of (0, 1)2 .
4
for k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . , where ψa (u) ≡ 1[u < 0] − a. The cross-quantilogram captures serial
dependence between the two series at different conditional quantile levels. In the special
case of a single time series, the cross-quantilogram becomes the quantilogram proposed by
Linton and Whang (2007). Note that it is well-defined even for processes {(y1t , y2t )}t∈N with
infinite moments. Like the quantilogram, the cross-quantilogram is invariant to any strictly
monotonic transformation applied to both series, such as the logarithmic transformation.4
To construct the sample analogue of the cross-quantilogram based on observations {(yt , xt )}Tt=1 ,
we first estimate conditional quantile functions.
In this paper, we consider the linear
quantile regression model proposed by Koenker and Bassett (1978) for simplicity and let
qi,t (τi ) = x⊤
it βi (τi ) with a di × 1 vector of unknown parameters βi (τi ) for i = 1, 2. To estimate
the parameters β(τ ) ≡ [β1 (τ1 )⊤ , β2 (τ2 )⊤ ]⊤ , we separately solve the following minimization
problems:
β̂i (τi ) = arg min
βi ∈Rdi
T
X
t=1
̺τi yit − x⊤
it βi ,
where ̺a (u) ≡ u(a − 1[u < 0]). Let β̂(τ ) ≡ [β̂1 (τ1 )⊤ , β̂2 (τ2 )⊤ ]⊤ and q̂i,t (τi ) = x⊤
it β̂i (τi ) for i =
1,2. The sample cross-quantilogram is defined by
PT
ψτ1 (y1t − q̂1,t (τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q̂2,t−k (τ2 ))
qP
,
T
2 (y − q̂ (τ ))
2 (y
ψ
ψ
−
q̂
(τ
))
1,t 1
2,t−k 2
t=k+1 τ1 1t
t=k+1 τ2 2,t−k
ρ̂τ (k) = qP
T
t=k+1
(2)
for k = 0, ±1, ±2, . . . . Given a set of conditional quantiles, the cross-quantilogram considers dependence in terms of the direction of deviation from conditional quantiles and thus
measures the directional predictability from one series to another. This can be a useful del
h
When one is interested in measuring serial dependence
events {q1,t (τ1 ) ≤ y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )}
l two
l h between
h
l
h
and {q2,t−k (τ2 ) ≤ y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )} for arbitrary τ1 , τ1 and τ2 , τ2 , one can use an alternative version
of the cross-quantilogram that is defined by replacing ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi )) in (1) with
ψ[τ l ,τ h ] (yit − qi,t ( τil , τih )) = 1[qi,t (τil ) < yit < qi,t τih ] − τih − τil .
i i
4
For example, if τ1 = [0.9, 1.0] and τ2 = [0.4, 0.6] , the alternative version measures dependence between an
event that y1t is in a high range and an event that y2,t−k is in a mid-range. In some cases, such an alternative
version could be easier to interpret and therefore be useful. The inference procedure provided in this paper
is also valid for the alternative version of the cross-quantilogram. See the working paper version of this paper
for an empirical application using the alternative version.
5
scriptive device. By construction, ρ̂τ (k) ∈ [−1, 1] with ρ̂τ (k) = 0 corresponding to the case
of no directional predictability. The form of the statistic generalizes to the l dimensional
multivariate case and the (i, j)th entry of the corresponding cross-correlation matrices Γτ̄ (k)
is given by applying (2) for a pair of variables (yit , xit ) and (yjt−k , xjt−k ) and a pair of con⊤
ditional quantiles (q̂i,t (τi ), q̂j,t−k (τj ))) for τ̄ = (τ1 , . . . , τl ) . The cross-correlation matrices
⊤
possess the usual symmetry property Γτ̄ (k) = Γτ̄ (−k) when τ1 = · · · = τd .
Suppose that τ ∈ T and p are given. One may be interested in testing the null hypothesis
H0 : ρτ (1) = · · · = ρτ (p) = 0 against the alternative hypothesis that ρτ (k) 6= 0 for
some k ∈ {1, . . . , p}. This is a test for the directional predictability of events up to p lags
{y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 ) : k = 1, . . . , p} for {y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )}. For this hypothesis, we can use the
P
(p)
Box-Pierce type statistic Q̂τ = T pk=1 ρ̂2τ (k). In practice, we recommend to use the BoxP
(p)
Ljung version Q̌τ ≡ T (T + 2) pk=1 ρ̂2τ (k)/(T − k) which had small sample improvements
in our simulations.
On the other hand, one may be interested in testing a stronger null hypothesis, i.e. the
absence of directional predictability over a set of quantiles: H0 : ρτ (1) = · · · = ρτ (p) = 0,
∀τ ∈ T , against the alternative hypothesis that ρτ (k) 6= 0 for some (k, τ ) ∈ {1, . . . , p} × T
with p fixed. In this case, we can use the sup-version test statistic
sup Q̂τ(p)
τ ∈T
= sup T
τ ∈T
p
X
ρ̂2τ (k).
k=1
(p)
Note that the portmanteau test statistic Q̂τ for a specific quantile is a special case of the
sup-version test statistic.
3
Asymptotic Properties
We next present the asymptotic properties of the sample cross-quantilogram and related test
statistics. Since these quantities contain non-smooth functions, we employ techniques widely
used in the literature on quantile regression, see Koenker and Bassett (1978) and Pollard
6
(1991) among others.
Define yt,k = (y1t , y2,t−k )⊤ , xt,k = (x1t , x2,t−k ), qt,k (τ ) = [q1,t (τ1 ), q2,t−k (τ2 )]⊤ and q̂t,k (τ ) =
[q̂1,t (τ1 ), q̂2,t−k (τ2 )]⊤ and let {yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ )} = {y1t ≤ q1 (τ1 |x1t ), y2,t−k ≤ q2 (τ2 |x2t−k )} and
(k)
Fy|x (·|xt,k ) = P (yt,k ≤ ·|xt,k ) for t = k + 1, . . . , T and for some finite integer k > 0. We
(k)
use ∇G(k) (τ ) to denote ∂/∂vE[Fy|x (vt,k |xt,k )] evaluated at vt,k = qt,k (τ ), where vt,k =
⊤
⊤
di
[x⊤
(i = 1, 2). Let d0 = 1 + d1 + d2 .
1t v1 , x2,t−k v2 ] for vi ∈ R
Assumption
A1. {(yt , xt )}t∈Z is strictly stationary and strong mixing with coefficients {αj }j∈Z+ that
P
2s−2 ν/(2s+ν)
satisfy ∞
αj
< ∞ for some integer s ≥ 3 and ν ∈ (0, 1). For each
j=0 (j + 1)
(j)
(1)
(d )
i = 1, 2, E|xit |2s+ν < ∞ for all j = 1, . . . , di , given xit = [xit , . . . , xit i ]⊤ .
A2. The conditional distribution function Fyi |xi (·|xit ) has continuous densities fyi |xi (·|xit ),
which is uniformly bounded away from 0 and ∞ at qi,t (τi ) uniformly over τi ∈ Ti , for
i = 1, 2 and for all t ∈ Z.
A3. For any ǫ > 0 there exists a ν(ǫ) such that supτi ∈Ti sups:|s|≤ν(ǫ) |fyi |xi (qi,t (τi )|xit ) −
fyi |xi (qi,t (τi ) + s|xit )| < ǫ for i = 1, 2 and for all t ∈ Z.
(k)
A4. For every k ∈ {1, . . . , p}, the conditional joint distribution Fy|x (·|xt,k ) has the condi(k)
tional density fy|x (·|xt,k ), which is bounded uniformly in the neighborhood of quantiles
of interest, and also has a bounded, continuous first derivative for each argument uniformly in the neighborhood of quantiles of interest and thus ∇G(k) (τ ) exists over τ ∈ T .
A5. For each i = 1, 2, there exist positive definite matrices Mi and Di (τi ) such that
PT
P
⊤
−1
(a) plimT →∞ T −1 Tt=1 xit x⊤
it = Mi and (b) plimT →∞ T
t=1 fyi |xi (qi,t (τi )|xit )xit xit =
Di (τi ) uniformly in τi ∈ Ti .
Assumption A1 imposes the mixing rate used in Andrews and Pollard (1994) and a
moment condition on regressors, while allowing for the dependent variables to be processes
7
with infinite moments. For a strong mixing process, ρτ (k) → 0 as k → ∞ for all τ ∈
(0, 1). Assumption A2 ensures that the conditional quantile function given xit is uniquely
defined while allowing for dynamic misspecification, or P (yit ≤ qi,t (τi )|Fit ) 6= τi given some
information set Fit containing all “relevant” information available at t for i = 1, 2. In
the absence of dynamic misspecification, which is assumed in Hong et al. (2009) under
their null hypothesis, the analysis becomes substantially simple because each hit-process
{ψτi (y − qi,t (τi ))} is a sequence of iid Bernoulli random variables. As Corradi and Swanson
(2006) discuss, however, results under correct dynamic specification crucially rely on an
appropriate choice of the information set; specification search for the information set based on
pre-testing may have a nontrivial impact on inference. Thus, Assumption A2 is appropriate
for the purpose of testing directional predictability given a particular information set xit .
Assumption A3 implies that the densities are smooth in some neighborhood of the quantiles
of interest. Assumption A4 ensures that the joint distribution of (x1t , x2t−k ) is continuously
differentiable. Assumption A5 is standard in the quantile regression literature.
To describe the asymptotic behavior of the cross-quantilogram, we define a set of d0 dimensional mean-zero Gaussian process {Bk (τ ) : τ ∈ [0, 1]2 }pk=1 with covariance-matrix
function for k, k ′ ∈ {1, . . . , p} and for τ, τ ′ ∈ T , given by
⊤
k′
′
′
Ξkk′ (τ, τ ) ≡ E[Bk (τ )B (τ )] =
∞
X
l=−∞
⊤
cov ξl,k (τ ), ξ0,k′ (τ ′ ) ,
⊤
⊤
where ξt,k (τ ) = (1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ )], x⊤
1t 1[y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )], x2t 1[y2t ≤ q2,t (τ2 )]) for t ∈ Z. Define
⊤
⊤ ⊤
B(p) (τ ) = [B1 (τ ) , . . . , Bp (τ ) ] as the d0 p-dimensional zero-mean Gaussian process with the
covariance-matrix function denoted by Ξ(p) (τ, τ ′ ) for τ, τ ′ ∈ T . We use ℓ∞ (T ) to denote the
space of all bounded functions on T equipped with the uniform topology and (ℓ∞ (T ))p to
denote the p-product space of ℓ∞ (T ) equipped with the product topology. Let the notation
“⇒” denote the weak convergence due to Hoffman-Jorgensen in order to handle the measurability issues, although outer probabilities and expectations are not used explicitly in this
8
paper for notational simplicity. See Chapter 1 of van der Vaart and Wellner (1996) for a
comprehensive treatment of weak convergence in non-separable metric spaces.
The next theorem establishes the asymptotic properties of the cross-quantilogram.
Theorem 1 Suppose that Assumptions A1-A5 hold for some finite integer p > 0. Then, in
the sense of weak convergence of the stochastic process in (ℓ∞ (T ))p we have:
√
(p)
T ρ̂τ(p) − ρτ(p) ⇒ Λτ(p) B(p) (τ ),
(p)
⊤
⊤
(3)
⊤
where ρ̂τ ≡ [ρ̂τ (1), . . . , ρ̂τ (p)] and Λτ = diag(λτ 1 , . . . , λτ p ) with
λτ,k = p
1
τ1 (1 − τ1 )τ2 (1 − τ2 )
1
−∇G(k) (τ )[D1−1 (τ1 ), D2−1 (τ2 )]⊤
.
(4)
Under the null hypothesis that ρτ (1) = · · · = ρτ (p) = 0 for every τ ∈ T , it follows that
sup Q̂τ(p) ⇒ sup kΛτ(p) B(p) (τ )k2 ,
τ ∈T
(5)
τ ∈T
by the continuous mapping theorem.
3.1
3.1.1
Inference Methods
The Stationary Bootstrap
The asymptotic null distribution presented in Theorem 1 depends on nuisance parameters.
We suggest to estimate the critical values by the stationary bootstrap of Politis and Romano
(1994). The stationary bootstrap is a block bootstrap method with blocks of random lengths.
The stationary bootstrap resample is strictly stationary conditional on the original sample.
Let {Li }i∈N denote a sequence of iid random block lengths having the geometric distribution with a scalar parameter γ ≡ γT ∈ (0, 1): P ∗(Li = l) = γ(1 − γ)l−1 for each positive
9
integer l, where P ∗ denotes the conditional probability given the original sample. We assume
that the parameter γ satisfies the following growth condition:
√
Assumption A6. T ν/2(2s+ν)(s−1) γ + ( T γ)−1 → 0 as T → ∞, where s and ν are defined in
Assumption A1.
We need the condition that γ = o(T −ν/2(2s+ν)(s−1) ) for the purpose of establishing uniform
convergence over the subset T of [0, 1]2 , given the moment conditions on regressors under
Assumption A1. This condition can be relaxed when regressors are uniformly bounded
because γ = o(1) when s = ∞.
Let {Ki }i∈N be a sequence of iid random variables, which have the discrete uniform
distribution on {k + 1, . . . , T } and are independent of both the original data and {Li }i∈N .
Ki +Li −1
representing the blocks of length Li starting with the
We set BKi ,Li = {(yt,k , xt,k )}t=K
i
Ki -th pair of observations. The stationary bootstrap procedure generates the bootstrap
∗
samples {(yt,k
, x∗t,k )}Tt=k+1 by taking the first (T − k) observations from a sequence of the
resampled blocks {BKi ,Li }i∈N . In this notation, when t > T , (yt,k , xt,k ) is set to be (yjk , xjk ),
where j = k + (t mod (T − k)) and (yk,k , xk,k ) = (yt,k , xt,k ), where mod denotes the modulo
operator.5
Using the stationary bootstrap resample, we estimate the parameter β(τ ) by solving the
minimization problem:
β̂1∗ (τ1 ) = arg min
β1
∈Rd1
T
X
t=k+1
∗
∗
̺τ1 (y1t
− x∗⊤
1t β1 ) and β̂2 (τ2 ) = arg min
β2
∈Rd2
T
−k
X
t=1
∗
̺τ2 (y2t
− x∗⊤
2t β2 ).
∗
Then the conditional quantile function given the stationary bootstrap resample, qi,t
(τi ) ≡
∗
∗⊤ ∗
∗
∗⊤
∗⊤
⊤
x∗⊤
it βi (τi ), is estimated by q̂i,t (τi ) ≡ xit β̂i (τi ) for each i = 1, 2. Define β̂ (τ ) = [β̂1 (τ1 ), β̂2 (τ2 )]
∗
∗
∗
∗
(τ2 )]⊤ . We construct β̂ ∗ (τ )
(τ1 ), q2,t−k
(τ2 )]⊤ and q∗t,k (τ ) = [q1,t
and let q̂∗t,k (τ ) = [q̂1,t
(τ1 ), q̂2,t−k
by using (T − k) bootstrap observations, while β̂(τ ) is based on T observations, but the
5
For any positive integers a and b, the modulo operation a mod b is equal to the remainder, on division
of a by b.
10
difference of sample sizes is asymptotically negligible given the finite lag order k.
The cross-quantilogram based on the stationary bootstrap resample is defined as follows:
ρ̂∗τ (k)
PT
∗
∗
∗
∗
ψτ1 (y1t
− q̂1,t
(τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k
− q̂2,t−k
(τ2 ))
qP
.
T
∗
∗
∗
∗
2
2
t=k+1 ψτ1 (y1t − q̂1,t (τ1 ))
t=k+1 ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q̂2,t−k (τ2 ))
= qP
T
t=k+1
We consider the stationary bootstrap to construct a confidence interval for each statistic
of p cross-quantilograms {ρ̂τ (1), . . . , ρ̂τ (p)} for a finite positive integer p and subsequently
construct a confidence interval for the omnibus test based on the p statistics. To maintain the
original dependence structure, we use (T −p) pairs of observations {[(yt,1 , xt,1 ), . . . , (yt,p , xt,p )]}Tt=p+1
to resample the blocks of random lengths.
(p)∗
Given a vector cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ , we define the omnibus test based on the sta(p)∗
tionary bootstrap resample as Q̂τ
(p)∗
= T (ρ̂τ
(p)
⊤
(p)∗
− ρ̂τ ) (ρ̂τ
(p)
− ρ̂τ ). The following theorem
shows the validity of the stationary bootstrap procedure for the cross-quantilogram. We use
the concept of weak convergence in probability conditional on the original sample, which is
denoted by “⇒∗ ”, see van der Vaart and Wellner (1996, p. 181).
Theorem 2 Suppose that Assumption A1-A6 hold. Then, in the sense of weak convergence
conditional on the sample we have:
√ (p)∗
(p)
(p)
⇒∗ Λτ B(p) (τ )
(a) T ρ̂τ − ρ̂τ
in probability;
(b) Under the null hypothesis that ρτ (1) = · · · = ρτ (p) = 0 for every τ ∈ T ,
(p)∗
(p)
sup P sup Q̂τ ≤ z − P sup Q̂τ ≤ z →p 0.
∗
z∈R
τ ∈T
τ ∈T
In practice, repeating the stationary bootstrap procedure B times, we obtain B sets
(p)∗
⊤
of cross-quantilograms and {ρ̂τ,b = [ρ̂∗τ,b (1), . . . , ρ̂∗τ,b (p)] }B
b=1 and B sets of omnibus tests
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)
⊤
(p)∗
(p)
{Q̂τ,b }B
b=1 with Q̂τ,b = T (ρ̂τ,b − ρ̂τ ) (ρ̂τ,b − ρ̂τ ). For testing jointly the null of no
directional predictability, a critical value, c∗Q,α , corresponding to a significance level α is
11
(p)∗
given by the (1 − α)100% percentile of B test statistics {supα∈T Q̂α,b }B
b=1 , that is,
c∗Q,α
(p)∗
= inf c : P sup Q̂τ,b ≤ c ≥ 1 − α .
∗
τ ∈T
For the individual cross-quantilogram, we pick up percentiles (c∗1k,α , c∗2k,α ) of the bootstrap
√
√
∗ ∗
T (ρ̂∗τ,b (k) − ρ̂τ (k)) ≤ c∗2k,α ) =
distribution of { T (ρ̂∗τ,b (k) − ρ̂τ (k))}B
b=1 such that P (c1k,α ≤
1 − α, in order to obtain a 100(1 − α)% confidence interval for ρτ (k) given by [ρ̂τ (k) +
T −1/2 c∗1k,α, ρ̂τ (k) + T −1/2 c∗2k,α ].
In the following theorem, we provide a power analysis of the omnibus test statistic
(p)
supτ ∈T Q̂τ
when we use a critical value c∗Q,α . We consider fixed and local alternatives.
The fixed alternative hypothesis against the null of no directional predictability is
H1 : ρτ (k) 6= 0 for some (τ, k) ∈ T × {1, . . . , p},
(6)
and the local alternative hypothesis is given by
√
H1T : ρτ (k) = ζ/ T for some (τ, k) ∈ T × {1, . . . , p},
(7)
where ζ is a finite non-zero constant. Thus, under the local alternative, there exists a p × 1
(p)
vector ζτ
(p)
(p)
(p)
such that ρτ = T −1/2 ζτ with ζτ
having at least one non-zero element for some
τ ∈T.
We consider the asymptotic power of a test for the directional predictability over a range
of quantiles with multiple lags in the following theorem; however, the results can be applied
to test for a specific quantile or a specific lag order. The following theorem shows that the
√
cross-quantilogram process has non-trivial local power against the T -local alternatives.
Theorem 3 Suppose that Assumptions A1-A6 hold. Then: (a) Under the fixed alternative
in (6),
(p)
∗
lim P sup Q̂τ > cQ,α → 1.
T →∞
τ ∈T
12
(b) Under the local alternative in (7)
(p) (p)
(p) 2
(p)
∗
lim P sup Q̂τ > cQ,α = P sup kΛτ B (τ ) + ζτ k ≥ cQ,α ,
T →∞
τ ∈T
τ ∈T
(p)
where cQ,α = inf{c : P (supτ ∈T kΛτ B(p) (τ )k2 ≤ c)) ≥ 1 − α}.
3.1.2
The Self-Normalized Cross-Quantilogram
We use recursive estimates to construct a self-normalized cross-quantilogram. The selfnormalized approach was proposed by Lobato (2001) and was recently extended by Shao
(2010) to a class of asymptotically linear test statistics.6 The self-normalized approach has
a tight link with the fixed-b asymptotic framework proposed by Kiefer et al. (2000).7 The
self-normalized statistic has an asymptotically pivotal distribution whose critical values have
been tabulated so that there is no need for long run variance estimation or even bootstrap.
As discussed in section 2.1 of Shao (2010), the self-normalized and the fixed-b approach
have better size properties, compared with the standard approach involving a consistent
asymptotic variance estimator, while it may be asymptotically less powerful under local
alternatives (see Lobato (2001) and Sun et al. (2008) for instance).
Given a subsample {(yt , xt )}st=1 , we can estimate sample quantile functions by solving
minimization problems
β̂i,s (τi ) = arg min
βi ∈Rdi
s
X
t=1
̺τi yit − x⊤
it βi ,
for i = 1, 2. Let q̂i,t,s (τi ) = x⊤
it β̂i,s (τi ). We consider the minimum subsample size s larger than
[T ω], where ω ∈ (0, 1) is an arbitrary small positive constant. The trimming parameter, ω,
6
Kuan and Lee (2006) apply the approach to a class of specification tests, the so-called M tests, which are
based on the moment conditions involving unknown parameters. Chen and Qu (2015) propose a procedure
for improving the power of the M test, by dividing the original sample into subsamples before applying the
self-normalization procedure.
7
The fixed-b asymptotic has been further studied by Bunzel et al. (2001), Kiefer and Vogelsang (2002,
2005), Sun et al. (2008), Kim and Sun (2011) and Sun and Kim (2012) among others.
13
is necessary to guarantee that the quantiles estimators based on subsamples have standard
asymptotic properties and plays a different role to that of smoothing parameters in long-run
variance estimators. Our simulation study suggests that the performance of the test is not
sensitive to the trimming parameter.
A key ingredient of the self-normalized statistic is an estimate of cross-correlation based
on subsamples:
Ps
ψτ1 (y1t − q̂1,t,s (τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q̂2,t−k,s (τ2 ))
qP
,
s
2
2
t=k+1 ψτ1 (y1t − q̂1,t,s (τ1 ))
t=k+1 ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q̂2,t−k,s (τ2 ))
ρ̂τ,s (k) = qP
s
t=k+1
(p)
⊤
for [T ω] ≤ s ≤ T . For a finite integer p > 0, let ρ̂τ,s = [ρ̂τ,s (1), . . . , ρ̂τ,s (p)] . We construct
an outer product of the cross-quantilogram using the subsample
V̂τ,p = T
−2
T
X
s=[T ω]
(p)
s2 ρ̂τ,s
− ρ̂τ(p)
(p)
ρ̂τ,s
− ρ̂τ(p)
⊤
.
We can obtain the asymptotically pivotal distribution using V̂τ,p as the asymptotically random normalization. For testing the null of no directional predictability, we define the selfnormalized omnibus test statistic
⊤
−1 (p)
Ŝτ(p) = T ρ̂τ(p) V̂τ,p
ρ̂τ .
(p)
The following theorem shows that Ŝτ
is asymptotically pivotal. To distinguish the process
used in the following theorem from the one used in the previous section, let {B̄(p) (·)} denote a
p-dimensional, standard Brownian motion on (ℓ([0, 1]))p equipped with the uniform topology.
Theorem 4 Suppose that Assumptions A1-A5 hold. Then, for each τ ∈ T ,
Ŝτ(p) →d B̄(p) (1)
where V̄(p) =
R1
ω
⊤
V̄(p)
−1
B̄(p) (1),
⊤
{B̄(p) (r) − r B̄(p) (1)}{B̄(p) (r) − r B̄(p) (1)} dr.
14
The joint test based on finite multiple quantiles can be constructed in a similar manner,
while the extension of the self-normalized approach to a range of quantiles is not obvious.
The asymptotic null distribution in the above theorem can be simulated and a critical value,
cS,α , corresponding to a significance level α is tabulated by using the (1 − α)100% percentile
of the simulated distribution.8 In the theorem below, we consider a power function of the
(p)
self-normalized omnibus test statistic, P (Ŝτ > cS,α ). For a fixed τ ∈ T , we consider a fixed
alternative
H1 : ρτ (k) 6= 0 for some k ∈ {1, . . . , p},
(8)
√
H1T : ρτ (k) = ζ/ T for some k ∈ {1, . . . , p},
(9)
and a local alternative
(p)
where ζ is a finite non-zero scalar. This implies that there exists a p-dimensional vector ζτ
(p)
(p)
such that ρτ = T −1/2 ζτ
(p)
with ζτ
having at least one non-zero element.
Theorem 5 (a) Suppose that the fixed alternative in (8) and Assumptions A1-A5 hold.
Then,
lim P Ŝτ(p) > cS,α → 1.
T →∞
(b) Suppose that the local alternative in (9) is true and Assumptions A1-A5 hold. Then,
(p)
lim P Ŝτ > cS,τ = P B̄(p) (1) + (Λτ(p) ∆τ(p) )−1 ζτ(p)
T →∞
(p)
(p)
(p)
⊤
⊤
V
(p) −1
where ∆τ is a d0 p × d0 p matrix with ∆τ (∆τ ) ≡ Ξ(p) (τ, τ ).
8
We provide the simulated critical values in our R package.
15
(p)
(p) (p) −1 (p)
≥ cS,α ,
B̄ (1) + (Λτ ∆τ ) ζτ
4
The Partial Cross-Quantilogram
We define the partial cross-quantilogram, which measures the relationship between two events
{y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )} and {y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )}, while controlling for intermediate events between t
and t − k as well as whether some state variables exceed a given quantile. Let zt ≡ [ψτ3 (y3t −
⊤
q3,t (τ3 )), . . . , ψτl (ylt − ql,t (τl ))] be an (l − 2) × 1 vector for l ≥ 3, where qi,t (τi ) = x⊤
it βi (τi ) for
τi and a di × 1 vector xit (i = 3, . . . , l), and zt may include the quantile-hit processes based
on some of the lagged predicted variables {y1,t−1 , . . . , y1,t−k }, the intermediate predictors
{y2,t−1 , . . . , y1,t−k−1} and some state variables that may reflect some historical events up to
t.9
⊤
For simplicity, we present the results for a single set of quantiles τ̄ = (τ1 , . . . , τl ) and
a single lag k, although the results can be extended to the case of a range of quantiles and
multiple lags in an obvious way. To ease the notational burden in the rest of this section,
we consider the case for which a lag k = 0 without loss of generality and suppress the
⊤ ⊤
dependence on k. Let ȳt = [y1t , . . . , ylt ]⊤ and x̄t = [x⊤
1t , . . . , xlt ] .
We introduce the correlation matrix of the hit processes and its inverse matrix
i
h
⊤
and Pτ̄ = Rτ̄−1 ,
Rτ̄ = E ht (τ̄ )ht (τ̄ )
where an l × 1 vector of the hit process is denoted by ht (τ̄ ) = [ψτ1 (y1t − q1,t (τ1 )), . . . , ψτl (ylt −
⊤
ql,t (τl ))] . For i, j ∈ {1, . . . , l}, let rτ̄ ,ij and pτ̄ ,ij be the (i, j) element of Rτ̄ and Pτ̄ , re√
spectively. Notice that the cross-quantilogram is rτ̄ ,12 / rτ̄ ,11 rτ̄ ,22 , and the partial crossquantilogram is defined as
ρτ̄ |z = − √
pτ̄ ,12
.
pτ̄ ,11 pτ̄ ,22
9
In principle, the intermediate predictors and state variables do not need to be transformed into quantile
hits. As emphasized earlier, however, one of the main advantages of considering qauntile hits is its applicability to more general time series, being robust to the existence of moments. If needed, it is straightforward
to extend the results here to the case of the original variables in zt with additional moment conditions. We
thank an anonymous referee for pointing this out.
16
The partial cross-correlation also has a form
ρτ̄ |z = δ
s
τ1 (1 − τ1 )
,
τ2 (1 − τ2 )
where δ is a scalar parameter defined in the following regression:
ψτ1 (y1t − q1,t (τ1 )) = δψτ2 (y2t − q2,t (τ2 )) + γ ⊤ zt + ut ,
with a (l − 2) × 1 vector γ and an error term ut . Thus, testing the null hypothesis of ρτ̄ |z = 0
can be viewed as testing predictability between two quantile hits with respect to information
z̄ as in Granger causality test based on the regression form (Granger, 1969). By choosing
relevant variables z̄, one can use ρτ̄ |z for the purpose of testing Granger causality (Pierce and
Haugh, 1977). See also Hong et al. (2009) for testing Granger causality in tail distribution.
To obtain the sample analogue of the partial cross-quantilogram, we first construct a
vector of hit processes, ĥt (τ̄ ), by replacing the population conditional quantiles in ht (τ̄ ) by
the sample analogues {q̂1,t (τ1 ), . . . , q̂l,t (τl )}. Then, we obtain the estimator for the correlation
matrix and its inverse as
R̂τ̄ =
T
1X
⊤
ĥt (τ̄ )ĥt (τ̄ ) and P̂τ̄ = R̂τ̄−1 ,
T t=1
which leads to the sample analogue of the partial cross-quantilogram
ρ̂τ̄ |z = − p
p̂τ̄ ,12
,
p̂τ̄ ,11 p̂τ̄ ,22
(10)
where p̂τ̄ ,ij denotes the (i, j) element of P̂τ̄ for i, j ∈ {1, . . . , l}.
In Theorem 6 below, we show that ρ̂τ̄ |z asymptotically follows a normal distribution, while
the asymptotic variance depends on nuisance parameters as in the previous section. To address the issue of the nuisance parameters, we may employ the stationary bootstrap or the
17
self-normalization technique. For the bootstrap, we can use pairs of variables {(ȳt , x̄t )}Tt=1 to
generate the stationary bootstrap resample {(ȳt∗ , x̄∗t )}Tt=1 and then obtain the stationary bootstrap version of the partial cross-quantilogram, denoted by ρ̂∗τ̄ |z , using the formula in (10).
When we use the self-normalized test statistics, we estimate the partial cross-quantilogram
ρτ̄ ,s|z based on the subsample up to s, recursively and then use
V̂τ̄ |z = T
−2
T
X
s=[T ω]
s2 ρ̂τ̄ ,s|z − ρ̂τ̄ ,T |z
2
,
to normalize the cross-quantilogram, thereby obtaining the asymptotically pivotal statistics.
To obtain the asymptotic results, we impose the following conditions on the conditional
distribution function Fyi |xi (·|xit ) and its density function fyi |xi (·|xit ) of each pair of additional
variables (yit , xit ) for i = 1, . . . , l and on the pairwise joint distribution Fij (v1 , v2 |xit , xjt ) ≡
P (yit ≤ v1 , yjt ≤ v2 |xit , xjt ) for (v1 , v2 ) ∈ R2 .
Assumption A7. (a) {(ȳt , x̄t )}t∈Z is a strictly stationary and strong mixing sequence
satisfying the condition in Assumption A1; (b) The conditions in Assumption A2 and A3
hold for the Fyi |xi (·|xit ) and fyi |xi (·|xit ) at the relevant quantile for t = 1, . . . , T , for i =
1, . . . , l; (c) Fij (·|xit , xjt ) satisfies the condition in Assumption A4 and there exists a vector
⊤
∇r Gij ≡ ∂/∂br E[Fij (x⊤
it b1 , xjt b2 |xit , xjt )] evaluated at (b1 , b2 ) = (βi (τi ), βi (τj )) for (r, i, j) ∈
{1, 2}×{1, . . . , l}2 ; (d) There exist positive definite matrices Mi and Di (τi ) as in Assumption
A5 for i = 1, . . . , l.
Assumption A7(a) requires the same weak dependence property as in Assumption A1.
Assumptions A7(b)-(c) ensure the smoothness of the marginal conditional distribution,
marginal density function and the joint distribution of each pair (yit , yjt ) given (xit , xjt )
for 1 ≤ i, j ≤ l. Assumption A7(d) is used to derive a Bahadur representation of q̂it (τi ) for
i = 1, . . . , l.
We now state the asymptotic properties of the partial cross-quantilogram and the related
18
inference methods.
Theorem 6 (a) Suppose that Assumption A7 holds. Then,
√
T (ρ̂τ̄ |z − ρτ̄ |z ) →d N(0, στ̄2|z ),
for each τ̄ ∈ [0, 1]l , where στ̄2|z =
ξτ̄ t = −
X
1≤i,j≤l
i6=j
and λτ̄ i =
P
P∞
l=−∞
cov(ξτ̄ l , ξτ̄ 0 ) with
pτ̄ ,1i pτ̄ ,2j ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi ))ψτj (yjt − qj,t (τj )) +
1≤j≤l
j6=i
l
X
i=1
−1
λ⊤
τ̄ i Di (τi ) xit ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi )),
(pτ̄ ,1i pτ̄ ,2j + pτ̄ ,2i pτ̄ ,1j ) ∇1 Gij .
(b) Suppose that Assumption A6 and A7 hold. Then,
sup P ∗ ρ̂∗τ̄ |z ≤ s − P ρ̂τ̄ |z ≤ s →p 0,
s∈R
for each τ̄ ∈ [0, 1]l .
(c) Suppose that Assumption A7 holds. Then, under the null hypothesis that ρτ̄ |z = 0, we
have
√
T ρ̂τ̄ |z
1/2
V̂τ̄ |z
for each τ̄ ∈ [0, 1]l .
→d nR
1
ω
B(1)
{B(1) −
rB(r)}2dr
o1/2 ,
We can show that the partial cross-quantilogram has non-trivial local power against a
√
sequence of T -local alternatives, applying the similar arguments used in Theorem 3 and
Theorem 5, and thus we omit the details.
19
5
Monte Carlo Simulation
We investigate the finite sample performance of our test statistics. We adopt the following
simple VAR model with covariates and consider two data generating processes for the error
terms.
y1t = 0.1 + 0.3y1,t−1 + 0.2y2,t−1 + 0.3z1t + u1t
y2t = 0.1 + 0.2y2,t−1 + 0.3z2t + u2t ,
where zit ∼ iid χ2 (3)/3 for i = 1, 2.
DGP1: (u1t , u2t )⊤ ∼ iid N (0, I2 ) where I2 is a 2 ×2 identity matrix. We let (u1t , u2t , z1t , z2t )
be mutually independent.
DGP2:
u1t σ1t 0 ε1t
=
ε2t
0 1
u2t
2
2
where (ε1t , ε2t )⊤ ∼ iid N (0, I2) and σ1t
= 0.1+0.2u21,t−1+0.2σ1,t−1
+u22,t−1 . We let (ε1t , ε2t , z1t , z2t )
be mutually independent.
The sample cross-quantilogram defined in (2) adopts conditional quantiles q̂it (τi ) =
⊤
⊤ ⊤
x⊤
by quantile regression of the above
it β̂i (τi ). We first estimate β(τ ) ≡ [β1 (τ1 ) , β2 (τ2 ) ]
VAR model, where x1t = (1, y1,t−1, y2,t−1 , z1t )⊤ and x2t = (1, y2,t−1 , z2t )⊤ and then obtain the
sample cross-quantilogram using q̂it (τi ) = x⊤
it β̂i (τi ).
Under DGP1, there is no predictability from the event {y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )} to the
event {y1t ≤ q1t (τ1 )} for all quantiles τ1 and τ2 , because Pr [y1t ≤ q1t (τ1 ) | y2,t−k , x2,t−k ] =
Pr [u1t ≤ Φ−1 (τ1 )] = τ1 for all t ≥ 1 and τ1 ∈ (0, 1), where Φ denotes the standard normal
cdf.
Under DGP2, (u1t ) is defined as the GARCH-X process, where its conditional variance is the GARCH(1,1) process with an exogenous covariate. The GARCH-X process is
20
commonly used for modeling volatility of economic or financial time series in the literature, see Han (2015) and references therein. Under DGP2, there exists predictability from
2
{y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )} to {y1t ≤ q1t (τ1 )} through σ1t
for all quantiles (τ1 ,τ2 ) ∈ (0, 1)2 , except
the case τ1 = 0.5 because the conditional distribution of u1t given x1t is symmetric around
0.10
5.1
Results Based on the Bootstrap Procedure
We first examine the finite-sample performance of the Box-Ljung test statistics based on the
stationary bootstrap procedure. To save space, only the results for the case where τ1 = τ2
are reported here because the results for the cases where τ1 6= τ2 are similar. The Box-Ljung
(p)
test statistics Q̂τ
are based on ρ̂τ (k) for τi = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 or 0.95 and
k = 1, 2, . . . , 5. Tables 1 and 2 report empirical rejection frequencies of the Box-Ljung test
statistics based on the bootstrap critical values at the 5% level. The sample sizes considered
are T =500, 1,000 and 2,000. The number of simulation repetitions is 1,000. The bootstrap
critical values are based on 1,000 bootstrapped replicates. The tuning parameter γ is set to
be 0.01.11
In general, our simulation results in Tables 1-3 show that the test has reasonably good
size and power performance in finite samples. Table 1 reports the simulation results for the
DGP1, which show the size performance. The rejection frequencies are close to 0.05 in mid
quantiles, while the test tends to slightly under-reject in low and high quantiles.
Table 2 reports the simulation results for the DGP2, which show the power performance.
Except for the median, the rejection frequencies approach one as the sample size increases,
which shows that our test is consistent. As expected, the rejection frequencies are close to
10
To see this, note that the conditional distribution of u1t given x1t has median zero because Pr(u1t ≤
0 | x1t ) = Pr(σ1t ε1t ≤ 0 | x1t ) = Pr(ε1t ≤ 0 | x1t ) = Pr(ε1t ≤ 0) = 0.5 and likewise Pr(u1t ≥ 0 | x1t ) =
0.5. Therefore, letting Ft = (y2,t−k , x2,t−k ), Pr (y1t < q1,t (0.5) | Ft ) = Pr (u1t < 0 | Ft ) = Pr (ε1t < 0 | Ft ) =
0.5. This implies that there is no predictability from {y2,t−k ≤ q2,t−k (τ2 )} to {y1t ≤ q1,t (τ1 )} at τ1 = 0.5
under DGP2.
11
Recall that 1/γ indicates the average block length. We tried different values for γ including one chosen
by the data dependent rule suggested by Politis and White (2004) and the results are still similar particularly
for a large sample. The details of the data dependent rule is explained in Section 6.
21
0.05 at the median because there is no predictability at the median under the DGP2 (see
Footnote 10 for an explanation).
Next, we examine the finite-sample performance of the sup-version of the Box-Ljung test
(p)
statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ over a range of quantiles.12 The simulation results in Table 3 show that
(p)
the sup-version test statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ also has reasonably good finite sample performance,
though it tends to under-reject under DGP1. For DGP2, the rejection frequencies approach
one as the sample size increases.
5.2
Results for the Self-Normalized Statistics
(p)
We also examine the performance of the self-normalized version of Q̂τ under the same setup
as above. We fix the trimming constant ω to be 0.1.13 The number of repetitions is 3,000.
The empirical sizes of the test are reported in Table 4, where the underlying process is
the VAR model with DGP1. The test generally under-rejects under the null hypothesis
(DGP1), while at the extreme quantiles (τ = 0.05 or 0.95) the test slightly over-rejects in
the small sample (T = 500). This finding is not very surprising because the self-normalized
statistic is based on subsamples and at the extreme quantiles there are effectively not enough
observations to compute the test statistic accurately.
Using the GARCH-X process of DGP2, we obtain empirical powers and present the
results in Table 5. With a one-period lag (p = 1), the self-normalized quantilogram at
τ1 , τ2 ∈ {0.1, 0.2, 0.8, 0.9} rejects the null by about 23.0-30.0%, 64.3-68.3% and 91.7-94.0%
for sample sizes 500, 1,000 and 2,000, respectively. In general, the rejection frequencies
increase as the sample size increases, decline as the maximum number of lags p increases,
and are not sensitive to the choice of the trimming value. Our results suggest that the selfnormalized statistics may have lower power in finite samples compared with the test statistics
based on the stationary bootstrap procedure, see Lobato (2001) for a similar finding.
12
Due to computational burden, we compute the Box-Ljung test statistic as a maximum over nine quantile
levels τi = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95.
13
We also considered 0.03 and 0.05 for ω and the results are similar to those for ω = 0.1.
22
6
Empirical Studies
6.1
Stock Return Predictability
We apply the cross-quantilogram to detect directional predictability from an economic state
variable to stock returns. The issue of stock return predictability has been very important
and extensively investigated in the literature; see Lettau and Ludvigson (2010) for an extensive review. A large literature has considered predictability of the mean of stock return. The
typical mean return forecast examines whether the mean of an economic state variable is
helpful in predicting the mean of stock return (mean-to-mean relationship). Recently, Cenesizoglu and Timmermann (2008) considered whether the mean of an economic state variable
is helpful in predicting different quantiles of stock returns representing left tail, right tail
or shoulders of the return distribution. The cross-quantilogram adds one more dimension
to analyze predictability compared with the linear quantile regression, and so it provides a
more complete picture on the relationship between a predictor and stock returns. Moreover,
we can consider very large lags in the framework of the quantilogram.
We use daily data from 3 Jan. 1996 to 29 Dec. 2006 with sample size 2,717.14 Stock
returns are measured by the log price difference of the S&P 500 index and we employ stock
variance as the predictor. The stock variance is treated as an estimate of equity risk in the
literature. The risk-return relationship is an important issue in the finance literature; see
Lettau and Ludvigson (2010) for an extensive review. The cross-quantilogram can provide
a more complete relationship from risk to return, which cannot be examined using existing
methods. To measure stock variance, we use the realized variance given by the sum of
squared 5-minute returns.15 The autoregressive coefficient for stock variance is estimated to
be 0.68 and the unit root hypothesis is clearly rejected. The sample mean and median of
stock returns are 0.0003 and 0.0005, respectively.
14
The working paper version of this paper provides the results using the monthly data previously analyzed
in Goyal and Welch (2008).
15
The realized variance is obtained from ‘Oxford-Man Institute’s realised library’.
23
(p)
In Figures 1-3, we provide the sup-type test statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ , the cross-quantilogram
(p)
ρ̂τ (k) and the portmanteau test Q̂τ (we use the Box-Ljung versions throughout) to detect
directional predictability from stock variance, representing risk, to stock return. In each
graph, we show the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for no predictability based on 1,000
bootstrapped replicates. The tuning parameter 1/γ is chosen by adapting the rule suggested
by Politis and White (2004) (and later corrected in Patton et al. (2009)).16 Since it is for
univariate data, we apply it separately to each time series and define γ as the average value.
(p)
We first examine the sup-version Box-Ljung test statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ and the results are
provided in Figure 1. We consider low and high ranges of quantiles. For the low range,
we set T = [0.1, 0.3] and τi = 0.1 + 0.02k for k = 0, 1, · · · , 10. For the high range, we set
T = [0.7, 0.9] and τi = 0.7 + 0.02k for k = 0, 1, · · · , 10. In each range, there are eleven
different values of τi and we let τ1 = τ2 in calculating ρ̂τ (k) for simplicity. Figure 1 clearly
shows that there exists predictability from stock variance to stock return in each range.
(p)
Next we investigate the cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (k) and the portmanteau test Q̂τ
for
different quantile points in Figures 2(a)-3(b). For the quantiles of stock return q1 (τ1 ), we
consider τ1 = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95. For the quantiles of stock variance
q2 (τ2 ), we consider τ2 = 0.1 and 0.9. Figures 2(a) and 2(b) are for the case when the stock
variance is in the low quantile, i.e. τ2 = 0.1. The cross-quantilograms ρ̂τ (k) for τ1 = 0.05,
0.1, 0.2 and 0.3 are negative and significant for many lags. For example, in case of τ1 = 0.05,
it means that when risk is very low, it is less likely to have a large negative loss. On the
other hand, the cross-quantilograms for τ1 = 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 0.95 is positive and significant
for many lags. For example, in case of τ1 = 0.95, it means that when risk is very low, it
is less likely to have a large positive gain. However, the cross-quantilogram for τ1 = 0.5 is
mostly insignificant, which means that risk is not helpful in predicting whether stock return
is located below or above its median. Figure 2(b) shows that the Box-Ljung test statistics
are mostly significant except for τ1 = 0.5.
16
Specifically, 1/γ̂ = (2Ĝ2 /D̂SB )1/3 T 1/3 where D̂SB = 2ĝ 2 (0). The definitions of ĝ and Ĝ are given on
page 58 of Politis and White (2004).
24
Figures 3(a) and 3(b) are for the case when stock variance is in the high quantile, i.e. τ2 =
0.9. Compared to the previous case of τ2 = 0.1, the cross-quantilograms have similar trends
but much larger absolute values. For τ1 = 0.05, the cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (1) is −0.193,
which implies that when risk is higher than its 0.9 quantile, there is an increased likelihood
of having a very large negative loss in the next day. For τ1 = 0.95, the cross-quantilogram
ρ̂τ (1) is 0.188, which implies that when risk is high (higher than its 0.9 quantile), there
is an increased likelihood of having a very large positive gain in the next day. The crossquantilogram for τ1 = 0.5 is mostly insignificant and the Box-Ljung test statistics in Figure
3(b) are mostly significant except for τ1 = 0.5.
The results in Figures 1-3 show that stock variance is helpful in predicting stock return
and detailed features depend on each quantile of stock variance and stock return. When
stock variance is in high quantile, the absolute value of the cross-quantilogram is higher
and the cross-quantilogram is significantly different from zero for larger lags. Our results
exhibit a more complete relationship between risk and return and additionally show how the
relationship changes for different lags.
6.2
Systemic Risk
The Great Recession of 2007-2009 has motivated researchers to better understand systemic
risk—the risk that the intermediation capacity of the entire financial system can be impaired,
with potentially adverse consequences for the supply of credit to the real economy. One
approach to measure systemic risk is measuring co-dependence in the tails of equity returns
of an individual financial institution and the financial system.17 Prominent examples include
the work of Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011), Brownlees and Engle (2012) and White et al.
(2012). Since the cross-quantilogram measures quantile dependence between time series, we
apply it to measure systemic risk.
17
Bisias et al. (2012) categorize the current approaches to measuring systemic risk along the following lines:
1) tail measures, 2) contingent claims analysis, 3) network models, and 4) dynamic stochastic macroeconomic
models.
25
We use the daily CRSP market value weighted index return as the market index return as
in Brownlees and Engle (2012). We consider returns on JP Morgan Chase (JPM), Morgan
Stanley (MS) and AIG as individual financial institutions. As in Brownlees and Engle
(2012), JPM, MS and AIG belong to the Depositories group, the Broker-Dealers group and
the Insurance group, respectively. We investigate the cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (k) between
an individual institution’s stock return and the market index return for k = 60 and τ1 =
τ2 = 0.05. In each graph, we show the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals for no quantile
dependence based on 1,000 bootstrapped replicates.
The sample period is from 24 Feb. 1993 to 31 Dec. 2014 with sample size 5,505.18 The
data including the financial crisis from 2007 and 2009 might not be suitable to be viewed
as a strictly stationary sequence and hence may not fit into our theoretical framework.19
Nevertheless, we provide the empirical results because it would be practically interesting to
consider a sample period that includes the recent crisis and post-crisis.20
In Figure 4, each graph in the left column shows the cross-quantilogram from each individual institution to the market. The cross-quantilograms are positive and generally significant
for large lags. The cross-quantilogram from JPM to the market reaches its peak (0.146) at
k = 12 and declines steadily afterwards. This means that it takes about two weeks for the
systemic risk from JPM to reach its peak once JPM is in distress. From MS to the market,
the cross-quantilogram reaches its peak (0.127) at k = 2. From AIG to the market, the
cross-quantilogram reaches its peak (0.127) at k = 17. When AIG is in distress, the systemic
risk from AIG takes a longer time (about three weeks) to reach its peak. When an individual
financial institution is in distress, each institution makes an influence on the market in a
different way.
Each graph in the right column of Figure 4 shows the cross-quantilograms from the
18
The stock return series of Morgan Stanley are available from 24 Feb. 1993. The stock return series of
individual financial institutions are obtained from Yahoo Finance.
19
A rigorous treatment of nonstationary time series in our context is a challenging issue and will be
reported in a future work.
20
The results for the sample period from 24 Feb. 1993 to 29 Dec. 2006 are also available from the authors
upon request.
26
market to an individual institution. The cross-quantilogram for this case is a measure of an
individual institution’s exposure to system wide distress and therefore it is similar to the
stress tests performed by individual institutions. From the market to each institutions, the
cross-quantilogram at k = 1 is relatively low for JPM (0.062) and MS (0.073) while it is
higher for AIG (0.104). Overall, when the market is in distress, each institution is influenced
by its impact in a different way. But the cross-quantilogram reaches its peak at k = 2 for all
cases. The cross-quantilograms at k = 2 are 0.135, 0.131 and 0.139 for JPM, MS and AIG,
respectively.
As shown in Figure 4, the cross-quantilogram is a measure for either an institution’s
systemic risk or an institution’s exposure to system wide distress. Compared to existing
methods, one important feature of the cross-quantilogram is that it provides in a simple
manner how such a measure changes as the lag k increases. For example, White et al.
(2012) adopt an additional impulse response function within the multivariate and multiquantile framework to consider tail dependence for a large k. Moreover, another feature of
the cross-quantilogram is that it does not require any modeling. For example, the approach
by Brownlees and Engle (2012) is based on the standard multivariate GARCH model and it
requires the modeling of the entire multivariate distribution.
Next, we apply the partial cross-quantilogram to examine the systemic risk after controlling for an economic state variable. Following Adrian and Brunnermeier (2011) and
Bedljkovic (2010), we adopt the VIX index as the economic state variable. Since the VIX
index itself is highly persistent and can be modeled as an integrated process, we instead use
the VIX index change, the first difference of the VIX index level, as the state variable. For
the quantile of the state variable, i.e. τ3 in (10), we let τ3 = 0.95 because a low quantile of
a stock return is generally associated with a rapid increase of the VIX index.
Figure 5 shows that the partial cross-quantilograms are still significant in some cases
even if their values are generally lower than the values of the cross-quantilograms in Figure
4. This indicates that there still remains systemic risk from an individual institution after
27
controlling for an economic state variable. These significant partial cross-quantilograms will
be of interest for the management of the systemic risk of an individual financial institution.
7
Conclusion
We have established the limiting properties of the cross-quantilogram in the case of a finite
number of lags. Hong (1996) established the properties of the Box-Pierce statistic in the
case that p = pn → ∞ : after a location and scale adjustment the statistic is asymptotically
normal, see also Hong et. al. (2009) for a related work. No doubt our results can be
extended to accommodate this case, although in practice the desirability of such a test is
questionable, and the chi-squared type limit in our theory may provide better critical values
for even quite long lags. The cross-quantilogram is easy to compute and the bootstrap
confidence intervals appear to represent modest enlargements of the Bartlett intervals in the
series that we examined. The statistic shows the cross dependence structure of the time
series in a granular fashion that is more informative than the usual methods.
28
Appendix
In appendix, we use C, C1 , C2 , . . . to denote generic positive constants without further
clarification.
Appendix A. Asymptotic Results of Cross-Quantilogram
Lemma A1 Let {zt }t∈Z be a strict stationary, strong mixing sequence of Rd -valuedPrandom
variables for some integer d ≥ 1 with strong mixing coefficients {αj }j∈Z+ satisfying ∞
j=0 (j +
ν/(2s+ν)
1)2s−2 αj
∞. Then,
for some integer s ≥ 2 and ν ∈ (0, 1). Suppose that E[z1 ] = 0 and kz1 k2s+ν <
E
T
X
t=1
zt
2s
1−s
kz1 k2s
≤ T s C kz1 k2s
2s+ν .
2+ν + T
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
We define the process indexed by τ ∈ T :
T
o
1 X n
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ )] − E[Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )] .
Vt,k (τ ) := √
T t=k+1
Also, define a di × 1 vector of random variables indexed by τi ∈ Ti for each i = 1, 2:
T
1 X
Wi,T (τi ) := √
xit ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi )) .
T t=1
The below lemma shows the stochastic equicontinuity of the processes defined above, using
a similar argument in Bai (1996).
Proposition A1 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Let k ∈ {1, . . . , p} and
P2 define metrics
′
′
′
′
′
ρi (τi , τi ) = |τi − τi | for τi , τi ∈ Ti (i = 1, 2) and a metric ρ(τ, τ ) =
i=1 ρi (τi , τi ) for
′
τ, τ ∈ T . Then,
(a) VT,k (τ ) is stochastically equicontinuous on (T , ρ);
(b) Wi,T (τi ) is stochastically equicontinuous on (Ti , ρi ) for each i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Because of the importance of the result, we present the central limit theorem for strong
mixing sequence in the lemma below. The proof can be found in Corollary 5.1 of Hall and
Heyde (1980) or Rio (1997, 2013) among others.
A.1
Lemma A2 Suppose that the strict stationary sequence {zt }t∈Z satisfies the strong mixing
P
ς/(2+ς)
condition with E[z1 ] = 0 and E|z1 |2+ς < ∞ for some ς ∈ (0, ∞), while ∞
<
j=1 αj
PT
−1/2
2
2
2
2
∞. Then, limT →∞ E[(T
∈ [0, ∞). If σ > 0, then
t=1 zt ) ] = σ for some σ
PT
−1 −1/2
d
σ T
t=1 zt → N(0, 1).
Define a d0 × 1 vector BT,k (τ ) = [VT,k (τ ), W1,T (τ1 )⊤ , W2,T (τ2 )⊤ ]⊤ for τ ∈ T and k =
1, . . . , p. The following proposition shows the weak convergence of the process {BT,k (τ ) : τ ∈
T }pk=1.
Proposition A2 Suppose Assumptions A1-A5 hold. Then,
[BT,1 (·), . . . , BT,p (·)]⊤ ⇒ [B1 (·), . . . , Bp (·)]⊤ .
Proof. Proposition A1 shows that [BT,1 (·), . . . , BT,p (·)]⊤ is stochastic equicontinuous. Thus,
it remains to establish convergence of the finite dimensional distributions. By the CramerWold device, it suffices to show
J
X
j=1
θj
p
X
k=1
d
(j)
2
κ⊤
,
→ N 0, σθ,κ
k BT,k τ
for any {θj ∈ R}Jj=1 , {κk ∈ Rd }pk=1 , {τ (j) ∈ [0, 1]2 }Jj=1, and J ≥ 1, where
2
σθ,κ
=
J X
J
X
j=1 j ′ =1
θj θj ′
p
p
X
X
′
(j)
, τ (j ) )κk′ .
κ⊤
k Ξk,k ′ (τ
(A-1)
k=1 k ′ =1
The original time-series is a stationary sequence satisfying the strong mixing condition in
Assumption A1 and a measurable transformation involving lagged variables satisfies the same
mixing condition if the lag order is finite. Hence, the central limit theorem for strong-mixing
sequences in Lemma A2 shows that the convergence in distribution to the normal law with
the finite variance. Therefore, we establish the weak convergence.
Let v = (v1 , v2 ) ∈ Rd1 × Rd2 and vt,k = (v1,t , v2,t−k )⊤ ∈ R2 with vi,t = x⊤
it vi for i = 1, 2
and for t = 1, . . . , T . Define
T
o
1 X n
(k)
−1/2
−1/2
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ ) + T
vt,k ] − E[Fy|x (qt,k (τ ) + T
vt,k |xt,k )] ,
VT,k (τ, v) := √
T t=k+1
and
T
1 X
Wi,T (τi , vi ) := √
xit 1[yit ≤ qi,t (τi ) + T −1/2 vi,t ] − Fyi |xi (qi,t (τi ) + T −1/2 vi,t |xit ) .
T t=1
Proposition A3 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then,
A.2
(a) supτ ∈T supv∈VM |VT,k (τ, v) − VT,k (τ )| = op (1) for every M > 0;
(b) supτi ∈Ti supvi ∈Vi,M kWi,T (τi , vi ) − Wi,T (τi )k = op (1) for every M > 0 and i = 1, 2,
where VM = V1,M × V2,M with Vi,M = {vi ∈ Rdi : kvi k ≤ M} for i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Proposition A4 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then, for i = 1, 2
√
T {β̂i (τi ) − βi (τi )} = −Di−1 (τi )Wi,T (τi ) + op (1),
uniformly in τ ∈ Ti .
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
The below lemma shows that the limiting behavior of the cross-quantilogram process
reflects the contributions of estimation errors due to the estimation of the conditional quantile
function.
Proposition A5 Suppose that Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then, for each k ∈ {1, . . . , p},
√
√
VT,k (τ ) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂(τ ) − β(τ )}
p
+ op (1),
T {ρ̂τ (k) − ρτ (k)} =
τ1 (1 − τ1 )τ2 (1 − τ2 )
uniformly in τ ∈ T .
P
Proof. Let γ̂τ,k = T −1 Tt=k+1 ψτ1 (y1t − q̂1,t (τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q̂2,t−k (τ2 )) and γτ,k = E[ψτ1 (y1t −
q1,t (τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k − q2,t−k (τ2 ))]. Using a similar argument in Lemma 2.1 of Arcones (1998),
P
we can show supτi ∈Ti |T −1/2 Tt=1 ψτi (yit − q̂i,t (τi ))| = op (1) for i = 1, 2, because xit includes
a constant term. It follows that, uniformly in τ ∈ T ,
T
−1
T
X
t=1
ψτ2i (yit − q̂i,t (τi )) = τi (1 − τi ) + op (1), for i = 1, 2,
(A-2)
and
√
T (γ̂τ,k − γτ,k ) = T
−1/2
T
X
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ q̂t,k (τ )] − E Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k ) + op (1).
t=k+1
Define VM = {v ≡ (v1 , v2 ) ∈ Rd1 × Rd2 : maxi=1,2 kvi k ≤ M} for some M > 0 and let
⊤
⊤
vt,k = (x⊤
1t v1 , x2,t−k v2 ) . Then, Proposition A3 implies
T
−1/2
T
X
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k ] − E Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )
t=k+1
= VT,k (τ ) +
√
(k)
(k)
T E Fy|x (qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k |xt,k ) − Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k ) + op (1),
A.3
uniformly in (τ, v) ∈ T × VM for any M > 0. Also, the mean-value theorem implies
√
(k)
(k)
T E[Fy|x (qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k |xt,k ) − Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )] = ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ v + o(1) uniformly in
(τ, v) ∈ T × VM . Thus, for any M > 0,
sup
(τ,v)∈T ×VM
|RT (τ, v)| = op (1),
(A-3)
where
RT (τ, v) :=T −1/2
T
X
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k ] − E Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )
t=k+1
− VT,k (τ ) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ v .
Let ǫ be an arbitrary positive constant. Proposition A2 √
and A4 imply that there exists a
constant M > 0 such that P (supτ ∈T kβ̂(τ ) − β(τ )k > M/ T ) < ǫ for a sufficiently large T .
It follows that there exists an M > 0 such that
√
sup
P sup RT (τ, T {β̂(τ ) − β(τ )}) > ǫ < ǫ + P
|RT (τ, v)| > ǫ ,
τ ∈T
(τ,v)∈T ×VM
for a sufficiently large T . Thus, (A-3) yields
√
√
T (γ̂τ,k − γτ,k ) = VT,k (τ ) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂(τ ) − β(τ )} + op (1),
uniformly in τ ∈ T . This together with (A-2) yields the desired result.
Proof of Theorem
1. For each i = 1, 2, Proposition A4 yields an asymptotic linear
√
−1
approximation, T {β̂i (τi ) − βi (τ
√i )} = −Di (τi )Wi,T (τi )⊤+ op (1) uniformly in τi ∈ Ti , which
with Proposition A5 shows that T {ρ̂τ (k) − ρτ (k)} = λτ,k BT,k (τ )+op (1) uniformly in τ ∈ T .
For a finite p > 0, we have
√
(p)
T ρ̂τ(p) − ρτ(p) = Λτ(p) BT (τ ) + op (1),
(A-4)
uniformly in τ ∈ T . The desired result is obtained from Proposition A2 with the continuous
mapping theorem.
Appendix B. Stationary Bootstrap
A positive integer valued, possibly infinite random variable µ is said to be a stopping
time with respect to a filtration {Fn , n ≥ 1} if {µ = n} ∈ Fn , ∀n ∈ N. Given random block
lengths {Li }i∈N under the stationary bootstrap, define N = inf{i ∈ N : L1 + · · · + Li ≥ n}.
Then, N is a stopping time with respect to {σ(L1 , . . . , Li ) : 1 ≤ i ≤ n}. In the following
lemma, we present a moment inequality using ideas found in the literature on the sopped
random walk process. See Gut (2009) for a comprehensive treatment.
Lemma B1 Let {zt }t∈Z be a strict stationary, strong mixing sequence of Rd -valued random
A.4
variables for some integer d ≥ 1 with strong mixing coefficients {αj }j∈Z+ satisfying
2s−2
ν/(2s+ν)
αj
P∞
j=0 (j +
1)
for some integer s ≥ 2 and ν ∈ (0, 1). Suppose that kz1 k2s+ν < ∞ and a
stationary bootstrap resample,
{zt∗ }Tt=1 , from {ztP
}Tt=1 satisfies Assumption A6 with the sample
Pk+l−1
∗
zt∗ . Then,
size T > 0. Define Sk,l = t=k zt and Sk,l = k+l−1
t=k
E
where S̃k,l =
∗
S1,T
Pk+l−1
t=k
−E
∗
∗
S1,T
2s
∞
n
X
s
πl E S̃1,l
≤ C (T γ)
2s
+ E S̃1,T
l=1
2s
o
,
(zt − Ezt ) for k, l ∈ N.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Lemma B2 Suppose that the same conditions assumed in Lemma B1 hold. Then,
2s
s−1
∗
∗
≤ T s C kz1 k2s
kz1 k2s
E S1,T
− E ∗ S1,T
2+ν + γ
2s+ν ,
for a sufficiently large T .
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
We now turn to the asymptotic results of cross-quantilogram based on the stationary
bootstrap. Define
V∗T,k (τ )
and
W∗i,T (τi )
T
1 X ∗
√
1[yt,k ≤ q∗t,k (τ )] − 1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ )]
:=
T t=k+1
T
1 X ∗
∗
√
:=
xit ψτi yit∗ − qi,t
(τi ) − xit ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi ))
T t=k+1
for each i = 1, 2. The lemma below shows the stochastic equicontinuity of the processes,
V∗T,k (·) and W∗i,T (·), unconditional on the original sample.
Proposition B1 Suppose Assumption A1-A6 hold. Let k ∈ {1, . . . , p} and define metrics
ρi (·, ·) for i = 1, 2 and a metric ρ(·, ·) as in Proposition A1. Then,
(a) V∗T,k (τ ) is stochastically equicontinuous on (T , ρ);
(b) W∗i,T (τi ) is stochastically equicontinuous on (Ti , ρi ) for each i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Let B∗T,k (τ ) = [V∗T,k (τ ), W∗1,T (τ1 )⊤ , W∗2,T (τ2 )⊤ ]⊤ for (k, τ ) ∈ {1, . . . , p} × T and define
(p)∗
BT,k (τ ) := [B∗T,1 (τ ), . . . , B∗T,p (τ )]⊤ . As a norm that introduces the topology of (ℓ∞ (T ))pd0 ,
we use supτ ∈T k · k defined on (ℓ∞ (T ))pd0 , so that supτ ∈T kf (τ )k for any f ∈ (ℓ∞ (T ))pd0 .
A.5
Let BL1 be the set of all Lipschitz continuous, real-valued functions on (ℓ∞ (T ))pd0 with
a Lipschitz constant bounded by 1. We prove the following proposition by modifying the
argument used in Theorem 2 of Galvao et. al. (2014), where the approach of van der Vaart
and Wellner (1996, Theorem 2.9.6) is extended for the dependent process but their setup
differs from the one here.
Proposition B2 Suppose Assumptions A1-A6 hold. Then,
(p)∗
sup E ∗ h(BT ) − E h(B(p) ) →p 0.
h∈BL1
Proof. Let δ > 0. Given the compact set T in [0, 1]2 , there exists a finite partition
(j)
(j)
{T (j) }Jj=1 such that max1≤j≤J supτ ′ ,τ ′′ ∈T (j) kτ ′′ −τ ′ k ≤ δ. Pick up τ (j) ≡ (τ1 , τ2 )⊤ ∈ T (j) for
j = 1, . . . , J and let Πδ be a map from T to {τ (j) }Jj=1 so that Πδ (τ ) = τ (j) if τ ∈ T (j) . Define
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
BT ◦ Πδ and B(p) ◦ Πδ as the stochastic processes on T , given by BT ◦ Πδ (τ ) = BT (Πδ (τ ))
and B(p) ◦ Πδ (τ ) = B(p) (Πδ (τ )) for τ ∈ T . It follows from the triangle inequality that, for
any h ∈ BL1 ,
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
E ∗ h(BT ) − E h(B(p) ) ≤ E ∗ h(BT ) − E ∗ h(BT ◦ Πδ )
(p)∗
+ E ∗ h(BT ◦ Πδ ) − E h(B(p) ◦ Πδ )
+ E h(B(p) ◦ Πδ ) − E h(B(p) ) .
(A-5)
(A-6)
(A-7)
It suffices to show that (A-5) - (A-7) are op (1) uniformly in h ∈ BL1 .
We first consider (A-5). We have
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
∗
E sup E h(BT ) − E h(BT ◦ Πδ )
≤ E sup h(BT ) − h(BT ◦ Πδ ) .
h∈BL1
h∈BL1
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
Let IT,δ,ǫ
:= 1[supτ ∈T kBT (τ ) − BT ◦ Πδ (τ )k > ǫ] for ǫ > 0. Proposition B1 implies that
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
] < ǫ for every ǫ > 0. Also suph∈BL1 |h(BT ) − h(BT ◦ Πδ )| ≤ 2
limδ↓0 limT →∞ E[IT,δ,ǫ
because the range of a function h is [−1, 1]. It follows that
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
lim lim E sup h(BT ) − h(BT ◦ Πδ ) · IT,δ,ǫ ≤ 2ǫ.
δ↓0 T →∞
(p)∗
h∈BL1
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
Since suph∈BL1 |h(BT ) − h(BT ◦ Πδ )| ≤ supτ ∈T kBT (τ ) − BT ◦ Πδ (τ )k, we have
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
E sup h(BT ) − h(BT ◦ Πδ ) · (1 − IT,δ,ǫ) ≤ ǫ.
h∈BL1
(p)∗
(p)∗
Thus, limδ↓0 limT →∞ E[suph∈BL1 |h(BT )−h(BT ◦Πδ )|] ≤ 3ǫ. An application of the Markov
inequality yields that (A-5) is op (1) uniformly in h ∈ BL1 .
A.6
(p)∗
Next we shall show that suph∈BL1 |E ∗ [h(BT ◦ Πδ )] − E[h(B(p) ◦ Πδ )]| →p 0 for any
(p)∗
δ > 0. It suffices to show that {BT (τ (j) )}Jj=1 →d {B(p) (τ (j) )}Jj=1 conditional on the
original sample,
sequence.
To this end, we use the Cramer-Wold device
Pp every
PJfor almost
⊤ ∗
(j)
for some {θj ∈ R}Jj=1 and {κk ∈ Rd }pk=1. Let
and consider
k=1 κk BT,k τ
j=1 θj
P
P
P
P
(j)
∗
(j)
), where ξt,k (·) is defined in
) and vt = Jj=1 θj pk=1 κ⊤
vt∗ = Jj=1 θj pk=1 κ⊤
k ξt,k (τ
k ξt,k (τ
∗
Section 3 and ξt,k (·) is its bootstrap counterpart. Then, we can write
J
X
θj
j=1
p
X
∗
κ⊤
k BT,k
k=1
τ
(j)
=T
−1/2
T
X
(vt∗ − vt ).
t=k+1
As discussed in Proposition A2, {vt }t∈N is a stationary time-series satisfying Assumption 1.
As shown in p. 1237 of Kunsch (1989), the moment and strong-mixing assumption imposed
on the original time series implies the condition imposed on the forth joint cumulant in (8)
of Politis and Romano (1994). Hence, Theorems 1 and 2 of Politis and Romano (1994)
2
2
imply that the bootstrap estimate of the variance converges to σθ,κ
in probability, where σθ,κ
is defined in (A-1), and that we obtained the distribution convergence conditional on the
original sample.
Finally, consider (A-7). The process B(p) is uniformly continuous
on T , which
withthe
dominated convergence theorem yields that limδ↓0 suph∈BL1 E h(B(p) ◦ Πδ ) − E h(B(p) ) =
0. Hence, we obtain the desired conclusion.
∗
∗
∗
∗
For v = (v1 , v2 ) ∈ Rd1 × Rd2 , let vt,k
= (v1,t
, v2,t−k
)⊤ with vi,t
= x∗⊤
it vi for i = 1, 2. Define
V∗T,k (τ, v)
:= T
−1/2
T
X
∗
∗
1[yt,k ≤ q∗t,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k
] − 1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k ] ,
t=k+1
and
W∗i,T (τi , vi )
:= T
−1/2
T
X
∗
∗
∗
xit ψτi yit∗ − qi,t
(τi ) − T −1/2 vi,t
− xit ψτi yit − qi,t (τi ) − T −1/2 vi,t .
t=k+1
Proposition B3 Suppose Assumption A1-A6 hold. Then,
(a) supτ ∈T supv∈VM |V∗T,k (τ, v) − V∗T,k (τ )| = op (1) for every M > 0;
(b) supτi ∈Ti supvi ∈Vi,M kW∗i,T (τi , vi ) − W∗i,T (τi )k = op (1) for every M > 0 and i = 1, 2,
where VM = V1,M × V2,M with Vi,M = {vi ∈ Rdi : kvi k ≤ M} for i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Proposition B4 Suppose Assumption A1-A6 hold. Then, for i = 1, 2,
√
T {β̂i∗ (τi )
− βi (τi )} =
1
−Di−1 (τi ) √
T
A.7
T
X
t=k+1
∗
x∗it ψτi (yit∗ − qi,t
(τi )) + op (1),
uniformly in τi ∈ Ti .
Proof. A similar argument used in Proposition A4 completes the proof and thus the details
are omitted.
Proposition B5 Suppose that Assumption A1-A6 hold. Then, for each k ∈ {1, . . . , p},
√
√
V∗T,k (τ ) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂ ∗ (τ ) − β̂(τ )}
∗
p
+ op (1),
T {ρ̂τ (k) − ρ̂τ (k)} =
τ1 (1 − τ1 )τ2 (1 − τ2 )
uniformly in τ ∈ T .
P
∗
∗
∗
∗
∗
Proof. Let γ̂τ,k
= T −1 Tt=k+1 ψτ1 (y1t
− q̂1,t
(τ1 ))ψτ2 (y2,t−k
− q̂2,t−k
(τ2 )). Using a similar arguP
ment used to show Lemma 2.1 of Arcones (1998), we can show supτi ∈Ti |T −1/2 Tt=1 ψτi (yit∗ −
∗
q̂i,t
(τi ))| = op (1) for i = 1, 2. It follows that
T
−1
T
X
t=k+1
ψτ2i (yit∗ − q̂it∗ (τi )) = τi (1 − τi ) + op (1),
for i = 1, 2,
and
√
T
∗
γ̂τ,k
− γ̂τ,k = T
−1/2
T
X
∗
1[yt,k ≤ q̂∗t,k (τ )] − 1[yt,k ≤ q̂t,k (τ )] + op (1),
t=k+1
uniformly in τi ∈ Ti and τ ∈ T , respectively. As in Proposition A5, we can show
T
√
(k)
1 X
√
1[yt,k ≤ q̂t,k (τ )]−E Fy|x (qt,k (τ )xt,k ) = VT,k (τ )+∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂(τ )−β(τ )}+oP (1),
T t=k+1
uniformly in τ ∈ T . A similar argument used in Proposition A5 together with Proposition
B3 and A3 yields that, uniformly in τ ∈ T ,
T
h
i
1 X ∗
(k)
√
1[yt,k ≤ q̂∗t,k (τ )] − E Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )
T t=k+1
= VT,k (τ )∗ + VT,k (τ )
√
+ ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂ ∗ (τ ) − β(τ )} + op (1).
√
√
∗
It follows that T (γ̂τ,k
− γ̂τ,k ) = V∗T,k (τ ) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂ ∗ (τ ) − β̂(τ )} + op (1) uniformly
in τ ∈ T . Thus, we obtained the desired result.
√
(p)∗
∗(p)
(p)
Proof of Theorem 2. (a) Define the processes ĜT (τ ) := T (ρ̂τ − ρ̂τ ) and G(p) (τ ) :=
(p)
Λτ B(p) (τ ) for τ ∈ T and for an integer p > 0. Let g
BL1 denote the set of all Lipschitz
∞
p
continuous, real-valued functions on (ℓ (T )) with a Lipschitz constant bounded by 1. It
A.8
suffices to show that
(p)∗
sup E ∗ h(GT ) − E h(G(p) ) →p 0.
g1
h∈BL
(p)∗
(p)
(p)∗
Let GT (τ ) := Λτ BT (τ ). We can write
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
sup E ∗ h(ĜT ) − E h(G(p) ) ≤ sup E ∗ h(ĜT ) − E ∗ h(GT )
g1
h∈BL
g1
h∈BL
(p)∗
+ sup E ∗ h(GT ) − E h(G(p) ) .
g1
h∈BL
√
Propositions A4 and B4 imply that T {β̂i∗ (τi )−β̂i (τi )} = −Di−1 (τi )W∗1,T (τi )+op(1) uniformly
in τi ∈ Ti for each i = 1, 2. It follows from Proposition B3 that
√
∗
T {ρ̂∗τ (k) − ρ̂τ (k)} = λ⊤
τ,k BT,k (τ ) + op (1),
uniformly in τ ∈ T , where λτ,k is defined in (4). This leads to
(p)∗
(p)∗
sup ĜT (τ ) − GT (τ ) = op (1).
τ ∈T
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
(p)∗
This implies that suph∈BL
g1 |h(ĜT )−h(GT )| = op (1), because suph∈BL
g1 |h(ĜT )−h(GT )| ≤
(p)∗
(p)∗
supτ ∈T kĜT (τ ) − GT (τ )k. It follows from the dominated convergence theorem that
(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
∗
limT →∞ E suph∈BL
g1 |E [h(ĜT )] − E [h(GT )]| = 0. An application of the Markov inequal(p)∗
(p)∗
∗
∗
ity shows that suph∈BL
g1 |E [h(ĜT )] − E [h(GT )]| = op (1).
(p)
Under Assumption A4 and A5, Λτ is bounded uniformly in τ ∈ T , we have
(p)∗
(p)∗
sup E ∗ h(GT ) − E h(G(p) ) ≤ C1 sup E ∗ g(BT ) − E g(B(p) ) ,
g∈BL1
g1
h∈BL
where the right-hand side is negligible in probability from Proposition B2. Hence, we obtain
the desired result.
(b) From the continuous mapping theorem, the result in (a) of this theorem yields the
desired result. See Theorem 10.8 of Kosorok (2007) for a general argument.
Proof of Theorem 3. As shown in (A-4), under both fixed and local alternatives,
√
(p)
T ρ̂τ(p) − ρτ(p) = Λτ(p) BT (τ ) + op (1)
(p)
(p)
uniformly in τ ∈ T , and it follows from Theorem 1 that Λτ BT (τ ) = OP (1) uniformly in
τ ∈T.
(p)
(a) Under the fixed alternative, there is some τ ∈ T such that ρτ is some non-zero
√ (p)
√
(p) (p)
(p)
constant and then T ρ̂τ = Λτ BT (τ ) + T ρτ + op (1) uniformly in τ ∈ T . This im(p)
(p)
plies that, under the fixed alternative, supτ ∈T Q̂τ = T supτ ∈T kρτ k2 (1 + op (1)). Thus,
(p)
supτ ∈T Q̂τ →p ∞ under the fixed alternative, whereas the critical value c∗Q,τ is bounded in
A.9
(p)
probability from Theorem 2. Therefore, limT →∞ P (supτ ∈T Q̂τ > c∗Q,τ ) = 1. Therefore, our
test is shown to be consistent under the fixed alternative. √
(p)
(p)
(p)
(b) Under the local alternative, we can write ρτ = ζτ / T , where ζτ is a p-dimensional
constant vector, at least one of elements is non-zero. Thus, we have
(p)
Q̂τ(p) = kΛτ(p) BT (τ ) + ζτ(p) k2 + oP (1),
uniformly in τ ∈ T . From Theorem 1 and the continuous mapping theorem,
sup Q̂τ(p) ⇒ sup kΛτ(p) B(p) (τ ) + ζτ(p)k2 .
τ ∈T
τ ∈T
(p)∗
Also, Theorem 2 implies supτ ∈T Q̂τ
desired result follows.
(p)
⇒∗ supτ ∈T kΛτ B(p) (τ )k2 in probability. Thus, the
Appendix C. Self-Normalized Cross-Quantilogram
Lemma C1 Let {zt }t∈Z be a strict stationary, strong mixing sequence of Rd -valuedPrandom
variables for some integer d ≥ 1 with strong mixing coefficients {αj }j∈Z+ satisfying ∞
j=0 (j +
ν/(2s+ν)
1)2s−2 αj
∞. Then,
for some integer s ≥ 2 and ν ∈ (0, 1). Suppose that E[z1 ] = 0 and kz1 k2s+ν <
E
sup
r∈[0,1]
[T r]
X
t=1
zt
2s
≤ CT s
z1
2s
2+ν
+ T 1−s z1
2s+ν
.
Proof. The desired result follows from Theorem 6.3 and Annexes C of Rio (2013) as in
Lemma A1.
We define the process indexed by r ∈ [0, 1]
[T r]
o
1 X n
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ )] − E[Fy|x (qt,k (τ )|xt,k )] ,
V̄T,k,τ (r) := √
T t=k+1
and
[T r]
1 X
W̄i,T,τi (r) := √
xit {1[yit ≤ qi,t (τi )] − τi } ,
T t=1
for each i = 1, 2. The following proposition shows the stochastic equicontinuity of the
processes defined above.
Proposition C1 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Let k ∈ {1, . . . , p} and define metrics
ρ̄(r, r ′ ) = |r ′ − r| for r, r ′ ∈ [0, 1]. Then,
(a) V̄T,k,τ (r) is stochastically equicontinuous on ([0, 1], ρ̄).
A.10
(b) W̄i,T,τi (r) is stochastically equicontinuous on ([0, 1], ρ̄) for each i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Define a d0 × 1 vector B̄T,k,τ (r) = [V̄T,k,τ (r), W̄1,T,τ1 (r)⊤ , W̄2,T,τ2 (r)⊤ ]⊤ . for r ∈ [0, 1]
and k = 1, . . . , p. The following proposition shows the weak convergence of the process
{B̄T,k,τ (r) : r ∈ [0, 1]}pk=1 .
Proposition C2 Suppose Assumptions A1-A5 hold. Then,
B̄T,1,τ (·), . . . , B̄T,p,τ (·)
⊤
⊤
⇒ B̄1,τ (·), . . . , B̄p,τ (·) .
⊤
Proof. Proposition C1 establishes the stochastic equicontinuity of B̄T,1,τ (·), . . . , B̄T,p,τ (·)
and it suffices to show convergence of the finite dimensional distributions. Since the finite
dimensional convergences can be shown by a similar argument used in Proposition A2, we
omit the details.
For v = (v1 , v2 ) ∈ Rd1 × Rd2 , we define
[T r]
h
io
1 X n
(k)
1[yt,k ≤ qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k ] − E Fy|x qt,k (τ ) + T −1/2 vt,k |xt,k
,
V̄T,k,τ (r, v) := √
T t=k+1
and
[T r]
1 X
W̄i,T,τi (r, vi ) := √
xit 1[yit ≤ qi,t (τi ) + T −1/2 vi,t ] − Fyi |xi qi,t (τi ) + T −1/2 vi,t |xit .
T t=k+1
Proposition C3 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then,
(a) supω≤r≤1 supv∈VM |V̄T,k,τ (r, v) − V̄T,k,τ (r)| = op (1) for every M > 0;
(b) supω≤r≤1 supvi ∈Vi,M kW̄i,T,τi (r, vi ) − W̄i,T,τi (r)k = op (1) for every M > 0 and for i = 1, 2,
where VM = V1,M × V2,M with Vi,M = {vi ∈ Rdi : kvi k ≤ M} for i = 1, 2.
Proof. See Supplemental Material.
Proposition C4 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then, for i = 1, 2 and for each τi ∈ Ti ,
√
T {β̂i,[T r] (τi ) − βi (τi )} = −Di−1 (τi )r −1 W̄i,T,τi (r) + op (1),
uniformly in r ∈ [ω, 1].
Proof. The proof follows the line of Proposition A4 with Proposition C3(b). Hence, we
omit the details.
A.11
Proposition C5 Suppose Assumption A1-A5 hold. Then, for each (k, τ ) ∈ {1, . . . , p} × T ,
√
√
r −1 V̄T,k,τ (r) + ∇G(k) (τ )⊤ T {β̂[T r] (τ ) − β(τ )}
p
T ρ̂τ,[T r] (k) − ρτ (k) =
+ op (1),
τ1 (1 − τ1 )τ2 (1 − τ2 )
⊤
⊤
⊤
uniformly in r ∈ [ω, 1], where β̂[T r] = (β̂1,[T
r] , β̂2,[T r] ) .
Proof. A similar argument used in Proposition A5 with Proposition C3(a) yields the desired
result and thus we omit the detail.
Proof of Theorem 4. Proposition C4 and C5 imply that, for each (k, τ ) ∈ {1, . . . , p} × T ,
√
T ρ̂τ,[T r] (k) − ρτ (k) = r −1 λ⊤
τ,k B̄T,k,τ (r) + op (1),
uniformly in r ∈ [ω, 1]. It follows that
in r ∈ [ω, 1]. This implies
√
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
T (ρ̂τ,[T r] − ρτ ) = r −1 Λτ B̄T,τ (r) + op (1) uniformly
n
o
[T r] (p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
√
ρ̂τ,[T r] − ρ̂τ,T = Λτ(p) B̄T,τ (r) − r B̄T,τ (1) + op (1),
T
(p)
(p)
(p)
uniformly in r ∈ [ω, 1]. From Proposition C2, {Λτ (B̄T,τ (r) − r B̄T,τ (1)) : r ∈ [ω, 1]} weakly
(p)
(p)
(p)
converges to {Λτ (B̄τ (r) − r B̄τ (1)) : r ∈ [ω, 1]}, which is equivalent in distribution to
(p)
a p × 1 vector of the Brownian bridge process {∆τ (B̄(p) (r) − r B̄(p) (1)) : r ∈ [ω, 1]} with
(p)
(p)
∆τ (∆τ )⊤ ≡ Ξ(p) (τ, τ ),and thus it follows from the continuous mapping theorem that
√ (p)
T ρ̂τ,T , V̂τ,p →d ∆τ(p) B̄(p) (1), ∆τ(p) V̄(p)(∆τ(p) )⊤ .
(p)
Thus, we obtain Ŝτ →d B̄(p) (1)⊤ (V̄(p) )−1 B̄(p) (1). This completes the proof.
Proof of Theorem 5. Under both fixed and local alternative, the argument used in
Theorem 4 gives
√ (p)
(p)
T ρ̂τ,[T r] − ρτ(p) = r −1 Λτ(p) B̄T,τ (r) + op (1),
(p)
(p)
(p)
(p)
⊤
thereby yielding V̂τ,p ⇒ (Λτ ∆τ )V̄(p) (Λτ ∆τ ) .
√ (p)
√ (p)
(p) (p)
(a) Under the fixed alternative, we have T ρ̂τ,T = Λτ B̄T,τ (1) + T ρτ + op (1), where
the right-hand side diverges in probability as T → ∞. Since the critical value we use is finite
in probability from Theorem 4, we obtain
result.
√ (p)the desired
(p) (p)
(p)
(b) Under the local alternative, T ρ̂τ,T = Λτ B̄T,τ (1) + ξτ + op (1). It follows that
Ŝτ(p) →d B̄(p) (1) + (Λτ(p) ∆τ(p) )−1 ξτ(p)
⊤
V̄(p)
This completes the proof.
A.12
−1 (p)
B̄ (1) + (Λτ(p) ∆τ(p) )−1 ξτ(p) .
Appendix D. Partial Cross-Quantilogram
For 1 ≤ i, j ≤ l, let 1ij = 1[yit ≤ qi,t (τi ), yjt ≤ qj,t (τj )] and define
VT,ij
T
T
1 X
1 X
=√
(1ij − E [1ij ]) and Wi,T = √
xit ψτi (yit − qi,t (τi )) .
T t=1
T t=1
Proof of Theorem 6. We first consider (a). The correlation matrix Rτ̄ is symmetric and
R̂τ̄−1 − Rτ̄−1 = −R̂τ̄−1 (R̂τ̄ − Rτ̄ )Rτ̄−1 . It follows that vec(P̂τ̄ − Pτ̄ ) = −Pτ̄ ⊗ P̂τ̄ vec(R̂τ̄ − Rτ̄ ),
which implies
l
l X
X
√
√
pτ̄ ,1i p̂τ̄ ,2j T (r̂τ̄ ,ij − rτ̄ ,ij ).
T (p̂τ̄ ,12 − pτ̄ ,12 ) = −
i=1 j=1
Following
the line of proof of Theorem 1, we can show P̂τ̄ = Pτ̄ + op (1) and also have
√
T (r̂τ̄ ,ii − rτ̄ ,ii ) = op (1) for i = 1, . . . , l, from argument in Lemma 2.1 of Arcones (1998).
Thus, we have
X
√
√
pτ̄ ,1i pτ̄ ,2j T (r̂τ̄ ,ij − rτ̄ ,ij ) + op (1).
T (p̂τ̄ ,12 − pτ̄ ,12 ) = −
1≤i,j≤l
i6=j
Proposition A5 implies
√
√
T (r̂τ̄ ,ij − rτ̄ ,ij ) = VT,ij + ∇1 G⊤
ij T {β̂i (τi ) − βi (τi )}
√
+ ∇2 G ⊤
ij T {β̂j (τj ) − βj (τj )} + op (1),
for 1 ≤ i, j ≤ l with i 6= j. Since VT,ij = VT,ji and ∇2 Gij = ∇1 Gji for 1 ≤ i, j ≤ l,
√
T (p̂τ̄ ,12 − pτ̄ ,12 ) = −
X
1≤i,j≤l
i6=j
pτ̄ ,1i pτ̄ ,2j VT,ij −
l
X
i=1
√
λ⊤
τ̄ i T {β̂i (τi ) − βi (τi )} + op (1),
where λτ̄ i is defined in Theorem 6. Proposition A4 implies
√
T (p̂τ̄ ,12 − pτ̄ ,12 ) = −
X
pτ̄ ,1i pτ̄ ,2j VT,ij +
l
X
−1
λ⊤
τ̄ i Di (τi ) Wi,T + op (1).
i=1
1≤i,j≤l
i6=j
The asymptotic normality can be established by using the central limit theorem for mixing random vectors. The proofs of (b) and (c) are similar to those of Theorems 2 and 4,
respectively, and thus we omit the details.
A.13
Appendix E. Tables and Figures
Table 1. (size) Empirical rejection frequency of the Box-Ljung test statistic
the bootstrap procedure
(VAR with DGP1 and the nominal level 5%)
Quantiles (τ1 = τ2 )
T
p 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.80 0.90
500 1 0.051 0.025 0.037 0.045 0.040 0.043 0.043 0.033
2 0.017 0.032 0.043 0.072 0.068 0.060 0.057 0.036
3 0.011 0.022 0.051 0.073 0.066 0.055 0.050 0.032
4 0.007 0.022 0.047 0.062 0.059 0.057 0.046 0.026
5 0.009 0.025 0.035 0.052 0.051 0.052 0.054 0.027
1000 1 0.033 0.030 0.037 0.048 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.052
2 0.018 0.037 0.045 0.051 0.043 0.046 0.052 0.041
3 0.011 0.031 0.049 0.056 0.044 0.054 0.045 0.028
4 0.013 0.027 0.049 0.053 0.041 0.055 0.041 0.022
5 0.007 0.022 0.044 0.040 0.044 0.040 0.036 0.021
2000 1 0.038 0.034 0.040 0.034 0.034 0.048 0.050 0.034
2 0.028 0.025 0.043 0.035 0.045 0.051 0.050 0.035
3 0.023 0.033 0.031 0.045 0.050 0.045 0.042 0.029
4 0.017 0.023 0.042 0.052 0.038 0.036 0.038 0.025
5 0.009 0.025 0.038 0.038 0.035 0.035 0.034 0.019
(p)
Q̂τ based on
0.95
0.047
0.012
0.010
0.008
0.006
0.042
0.015
0.006
0.008
0.006
0.054
0.024
0.018
0.016
0.014
Notes: The first and second columns report the sample size T and the number of lags p for the Box(p)
Ljung test statistics Q̂τ , respectively. The rest of columns show empirical rejection frequencies
based on bootstrap critical values at the 5% significance level. The tuning parameter γ is set to be
0.01.
A.14
(p)
Table 2. (power) Empirical rejection frequency of the Box-Ljung test statistic Q̂τ based
on the bootstrap procedure
(VAR with DGP2 (GARCH-X process))
Quantiles (τ1 = τ2 )
T
p 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.80 0.90 0.95
500 1 0.361 0.701 0.722 0.383 0.042 0.383 0.713 0.684 0.362
2 0.303 0.610 0.584 0.257 0.063 0.231 0.589 0.589 0.300
3 0.270 0.541 0.491 0.202 0.053 0.174 0.467 0.515 0.246
4 0.230 0.451 0.403 0.172 0.058 0.126 0.378 0.447 0.208
5 0.203 0.393 0.344 0.134 0.060 0.115 0.314 0.386 0.177
1000 1 0.751 0.948 0.942 0.638 0.048 0.619 0.951 0.952 0.760
2 0.708 0.916 0.912 0.425 0.046 0.431 0.908 0.932 0.712
3 0.651 0.877 0.845 0.322 0.052 0.315 0.849 0.897 0.651
4 0.589 0.838 0.784 0.255 0.048 0.250 0.778 0.854 0.596
5 0.537 0.801 0.716 0.203 0.042 0.190 0.714 0.809 0.563
2000 1 0.969 0.999 0.999 0.905 0.044 0.923 0.999 0.998 0.974
2 0.965 1.000 0.999 0.808 0.053 0.817 0.999 1.000 0.979
3 0.959 1.000 0.997 0.688 0.053 0.673 0.998 1.000 0.967
4 0.944 1.000 0.990 0.585 0.047 0.573 0.994 0.999 0.957
5 0.930 1.000 0.982 0.510 0.037 0.485 0.987 0.997 0.938
Notes: Same as Table 1.
A.15
Table 3. Empirical Rejection Frequencies of the sup-version of the Box-Ljung test statistic
(p)
supτ ∈T Q̂τ based on the bootstrap procedure
(VAR with DGP1/DGP2 and the nominal level 5%)
T
p
DGP1 (size)
DGP2 (power)
500 1
0.004
0.624
2
0.007
0.460
3
0.008
0.356
4
0.008
0.265
5
0.009
0.221
1000 1
0.004
0.976
2
0.011
0.946
3
0.006
0.895
4
0.003
0.825
5
0.007
0.765
2000 1
0.012
1.000
2
0.015
1.000
3
0.020
1.000
4
0.020
1.000
5
0.017
0.999
Notes: The first and second columns report the sample size T and the number of lags p for the sup(p)
version of the Box-Ljung test statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ , respectively. The sup-version test statistic is the
Box-Ljung test statistic maximized over nine quantiles τi = 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9and
0.95. The third and fourth columns show empirical rejection frequencies based on bootstrap critical
values at the 5% significance level. The tuning parameter γ is set to be 0.01.
A.16
Table 4. (size) Empirical Rejection Frequencies of the Self-Normalized Statistics
(VAR with DGP1 and the nominal level: 5%)
Quantiles (τ1 = τ2 )
T
p 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.80 0.90 0.95
500 1 0.043 0.000 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.013 0.007 0.000 0.047
2 0.090 0.010 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.127
3 0.130 0.007 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.143
4 0.150 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.167
5 0.187 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.177
1000 1 0.010 0.013 0.010 0.013 0.020 0.003 0.007 0.003 0.007
2 0.023 0.007 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.007 0.037
3 0.040 0.003 0.010 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.007 0.000 0.047
4 0.043 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.000 0.047
5 0.047 0.000 0.007 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.053
2000 1 0.013 0.030 0.017 0.017 0.033 0.013 0.020 0.017 0.027
2 0.007 0.000 0.007 0.007 0.027 0.010 0.027 0.017 0.020
3 0.017 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.013 0.010 0.003 0.003 0.013
4 0.013 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.010 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.013
5 0.010 0.003 0.003 0.000 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.017
Notes: The first and second columns report the sample size T and the number of lags p for the
(p)
test statistics Q̂τ , respectively. The rest of columns show empirical rejection frequencies given
simulated critical values at 5% significance level. The trimming value ω is set to be 0.1.
Table 5. (power) Empirical Rejection Frequencies of the Self-Normalized
(VAR with DGP2: GARCH-X process)
Quantiles (τ1 = τ2 )
T
p 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.50 0.70 0.80 0.90
500 1 0.067 0.230 0.297 0.077 0.007 0.150 0.300 0.253
2 0.030 0.070 0.113 0.033 0.000 0.037 0.113 0.077
3 0.047 0.010 0.043 0.010 0.000 0.017 0.023 0.020
4 0.063 0.007 0.023 0.000 0.000 0.010 0.013 0.003
5 0.120 0.003 0.007 0.003 0.000 0.003 0.003 0.000
1000 1 0.347 0.643 0.683 0.313 0.010 0.323 0.673 0.663
2 0.153 0.523 0.527 0.177 0.020 0.180 0.543 0.463
3 0.063 0.300 0.347 0.090 0.010 0.097 0.377 0.283
4 0.033 0.210 0.223 0.050 0.000 0.037 0.243 0.153
5 0.047 0.097 0.133 0.030 0.000 0.023 0.127 0.097
2000 1 0.757 0.917 0.923 0.663 0.030 0.693 0.940 0.920
2 0.577 0.873 0.917 0.513 0.013 0.540 0.883 0.863
3 0.427 0.787 0.860 0.400 0.007 0.397 0.800 0.810
4 0.270 0.680 0.807 0.323 0.017 0.297 0.740 0.680
5 0.197 0.567 0.700 0.223 0.003 0.213 0.680 0.590
Notes: Same as Table 4.
A.17
Statistics
0.95
0.050
0.010
0.023
0.050
0.080
0.317
0.157
0.063
0.017
0.020
0.707
0.577
0.390
0.250
0.163
Sup−version for low range
Sup−version for high range
1400
1800
1600
1200
1400
Portmanteau
Portmanteau
1000
800
600
1200
1000
800
600
400
400
200
0
200
0
10
20
30
Lag
40
50
60
0
0
10
(p)
20
30
Lag
40
50
60
Figure 1. Sup-version Box-Ljung test statistic supτ ∈T Q̂τ for each lag p to detect directional
predictability from stock variance to stock return. For the low range, we set T = [0.1, 0.3]and
τi = 0.1 + 0.02kfor k = 0, 1, . . . , 10. We let τ1 = τ 2 for ρ̂τ (k).For the high range, we set T = [0.7, 0.9]
and τi = 0.7 + 0.02k for k = 0, 1, . . . , 10. The dashed lines are the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals centred at the null hypothesis.
A.18
τ = 0.05
τ = 0.1
Quantilogram
1
Quantilogram
1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
0
0
−0.2
0
20
40
τ = 0.3
60
−0.2
0
1
20
40
τ = 0.5
60
−0.2
0.2
0
0
0
0
20
40
τ = 0.8
60
−0.2
0
20
40
τ = 0.9
60
−0.2
0.2
0
0
0
20
40
60
−0.2
0
20
40
Lag
60
20
40
τ = 0.95
60
20
60
1
0.2
0
0
1
0.2
−0.2
20
40
τ = 0.7
1
0.2
−0.2
0
1
0.2
1
Quantilogram
τ = 0.2
1
60
−0.2
0
40
Lag
Lag
Figure 2(a). The sample cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (k) for τ2 = 0.1 to detect directional predictability
from stock variance to stock return. Bar graphs describe sample cross-quantilograms and lines are
the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals centred at zero.
τ = 0.05
τ = 0.1
Portmanteau
1
500
0
0
20
40
τ = 0.3
60
Portmanteau
1
1000
1000
500
500
0
0
1
Portmanteau
τ = 0.2
1
20
40
τ = 0.5
60
60
500
0
0
20
40
60
0
20
40
τ = 0.95
1
60
0
20
60
1
200
50
20
40
τ1 = 0.8
20
40
τ = 0.7
400
100
0
0
1
150
500
0
0
60
0
0
20
40
τ = 0.9
1
60
0
1000
1000
500
500
0
0
Lag
20
40
Lag
(p)
60
0
40
Lag
Figure 2(b). Box-Ljung test statistic Q̂τ for each lag p and quantile τ using ρ̂τ (k) with τ2 = 0.1.
The dashed lines are the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals centred at zero.
A.19
τ = 0.05
τ = 0.1
Quantilogram
1
Quantilogram
1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0
0
0
−0.2
0
20
40
τ = 0.3
60
−0.2
0
1
20
40
τ = 0.5
60
−0.2
0.2
0
0
0
0
20
40
τ = 0.8
60
−0.2
0
20
40
τ = 0.9
60
−0.2
0.2
0
0
0
20
40
60
−0.2
0
20
40
Lag
60
20
40
τ = 0.95
60
20
60
1
0.2
0
0
1
0.2
−0.2
20
40
τ = 0.7
1
0.2
−0.2
0
1
0.2
1
Quantilogram
τ = 0.2
1
60
−0.2
0
40
Lag
Lag
Figure 3(a). The sample cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (k) with τ2 = 0.9 to detect directional predictability
from stock variance to stock return. Same as Figure 1(a).
τ = 0.05
τ = 0.1
Portmanteau
1
1000
1000
500
500
0
20
40
τ = 0.3
60
0
0
Portmanteau
1
Portmanteau
1
1500
1000
0
τ = 0.2
1
2000
20
40
τ = 0.5
60
60
0
0
20
40
τ = 0.9
1
60
0
1000
2000
2000
500
1000
1000
0
20
40
0
20
40
τ = 0.95
1
60
0
20
60
500
50
0
60
1000
100
20
40
τ1 = 0.8
20
40
τ = 0.7
1
150
0
0
1
500
0
0
60
0
0
Lag
20
40
Lag
(p)
Figure 3(b). Box-Ljung test statistic Q̂τ
Same as Figure 1(b).
60
0
40
Lag
for each lag p and quantile τ using ρ̂τ (k) with τ2 = 0.9.
A.20
Market to JPM
0.2
0.15
0.15
Quantilogram
Quantilogram
JPM to Market
0.2
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
0
20
40
−0.1
60
0
20
Lag
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
0
20
40
−0.1
60
0
20
Lag
AIG to Market
60
Market to AIG
0.2
0.15
0.15
Quantilogram
Quantilogram
40
Lag
0.2
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
60
Market to MS
0.2
Quantilogram
Quantilogram
MS to Market
0.2
−0.1
40
Lag
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
0
20
40
60
−0.1
Lag
0
20
40
60
Lag
Figure 4. The sample cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ (k). Bar graphs describe sample cross-quantilograms
and lines are the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals centred at zero.
A.21
Market to JPM
0.2
0.15
0.15
Partial Quantilogram
Partial Quantilogram
JPM to Market
0.2
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
0
20
40
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
60
0
20
Lag
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
0
20
40
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
60
0
20
Lag
0.15
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
20
60
Market to AIG
0.2
Partial Quantilogram
Partial Quantilogram
AIG to Market
0
40
Lag
0.2
−0.1
60
Market to MS
0.2
Partial Quantilogram
Partial Quantilogram
MS to Market
0.2
−0.1
40
Lag
40
60
0.1
0.05
0
−0.05
−0.1
Lag
0
20
40
60
Lag
Figure 5. The sample partial cross-quantilogram ρ̂τ̄ |z (k). Bar graphs describe sample partial
cross-quantilograms and lines are the 95% bootstrap confidence intervals centred at zero.
A.22
References
Adrian, T. and M.K. Brunnermeier (2011) CoVaR, Tech. rep., Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, Staff Reports.
Andrews, D.W.K. and D. Pollard (1994) An introduction to functional central limit theorems
for dependent stochastic processes, International Statistical Review, 62, 119-132.
Arcones, M. (1988) Second Order Representations of the Least Absolute Deviation Regression Estimator, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 50, 87-117.
Bai, J. (1996) Testing for Parameter Constancy in Linear Regressions: An Empirical Distribution Function Approach, Econometrica, 64, 597-622.
Bisias, D., M. Flood, A.W. Lo and S. Valavanis (2012) A survey of systemic risk analytics,
working paper, Office of Financial Research.
Brownlees, C. and R.F. Engle (2012) Volatility, correlation and tails for systemic risk management, Tech. rep., SSRN.
Bedljkovic, M. (2010) Nonparametric test of conditional quantile independence with an applicationi to banks’ systemic risk, working paper.
Bunzel, H., N.M. Kiefer and T.J. Vogelsang (2001) Simple robust testing of hypotheses in
nonlinear models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1088-1096.
Campbell, J.Y., A.W. Lo, and A.C. MacKinlay (1997): The Econometrics of Financial
Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Cenesizoglu, T. and A. Timmermann (2008) Is the distribution of stock return predictable?,
University of California at San Diego, working paper.
Chang, C.Y. and F.S. Shie (2011) The Relation Between Relative Order Imbalance and
Intraday Futures Returns: An Application of the Quantile Regression Model to Taiwan.
Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Volume 47, Number 3, 69 - 87.
Chen, Y.-T. and Z. Qu (2015) M tests with a new normalization matrix, Econometric Reviews, 34, 617-652.
Christoffersen, P.F., and F.X. Diebold (2002) Financial Asset Returns, market timing, and
volatility dynamics, working paper.
Corradi, V. and N.R. Swanson (2006) Bootstrap conditional distribution tests in the presence
of dynamic misspecification, Journal of Econometrics, 133, 779-806.
Cowles, A., and H. Jones (1937) Some A Posteriori Probabilities in Stock Market Action,
Econometrica, 5, 280-294.
A.23
Davis, R.A. and T. Mikosch (2009) The extremogram: a correlogram for extreme events,
Bernoulli, 15, 977-1009.
Davis, R.A., T. Mikosch, and I. Cribben (2012) Towards estimating extremal serial dependence via the bootstrapped extremogram, Journal of Econometrics, 170(1), 142-152.
Davis, R.A., T. Mikosch, and Y. Zhao (2013) Measures of serial extremal dependence and
their estimation, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 123(7), 2575-2602.
Deheuvels, P. (1979) La fonction de dépendance empirique et ses propriétés. Un test non
paramétrique d’indépendance, Acad. Roy. Belg. Bull. Cl. Sci.(5), 65, 274-292.
Dette, H., M. Hallin, T. Kley and S. Volgushev (2015) Of Copulas, Quantiles, Ranks, and
Spectra an L1 -approach to spectral analysis, Bernoulli, 21, 781-831.
Dufour, J.M., M. Hallin and I. Mizera (1998) Generalized Runs tests for heteroscedastic
Time Series, Nonparametric Statistics 9, 39-86.
Embrechts, P., C. Kluppelberg and T. Mikosch (1997) Modelling extremal events for insurance and finance, Springer, New York.
Engle, R.F. and S. Manganelli (2004) CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by
regression quantiles, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22, 367-381.
Fama, E. (1965) The behavior of stock market prices, Journal of Business, 38, 34 105.
Fermanian, J.-D., D. Radulovic and M. Wegkamp (2004) Weak convergence of empirical
copula processes, Bernoulli, 10, 847-860.
Galvao, A.F., K. Kato, G. Montes-Rojas and J. Olmo (2014) Testing linearity against threshold effects: uniform inference in quantile regression, Annals of the Institute of Statistical
Mathematics, 66(2), 413-439.
Goyal, A. and I. Welch (2008) A comprehensive look at the empirical performance of equity
premium prediction, Review of Financial Studies, 21, 1455-1508.
Granger, C.W.J. (1969) Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and CrossSpectral Methods, Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
Gut, A. (2009) Stopped Random Walks: Limit Theorems and Applications, Springer. New
York.
Hagemann, A (2013) Robust Spectral Analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.1965.
Hall, P. and C.C. Heyde (1980) Martingale limit theory and its application, Academic press
New York.
Han, H. (2013) Asymptotic properties of GARCH-X processes, Journal of Financial Econometrics, forthcoming.
A.24
Hong, Y. (1996) Consistent Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form, Econometrica,
Vol. 64, No. 4, , pp. 837-864.
Hong, Y. (2000) Generalized spectral tests for serial dependence, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62(3), 557-574.
Hong, Y., Y. Liu and S. Wang (2009) Granger causality in risk and detection of extreme risk
spillover between financial markets, Journal of Econometrics, 150, 271-287.
Ibragimov, R. (2009) Heavy-tailed densities, in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.
Eds. Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ibragimov, R., D. Jaffee and J. Walden (2009) Nondiversification traps in catastrophe insurance markets, Review of Financial Studies, 22, 959-993.
Kato, K. (2009) Asymptotics for argmin processes: Convexity arguments, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 1816-1829.
Kiefer, N.M. and T.J. Vogelsang (2002) Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust standard
errors using the Bartlett kernel without truncation, Econometrica, 70, 2093-2095.
Kiefer, N.M. and T.J. Vogelsang (2005) A new asymptotic theory for heteroskedasticityautocorrelation robust tests, Econometric Theory, 21, 1130-1164.
Kiefer, N.M., T.J. Vogelsang and H. Bunzel (2000) Simple robust testing of regression hypotheses, Econometrica, 68, 695-714.
Kim, M.S. and Y. Sun (2011) Spatial heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent estimation of covariance matrix, Journal of Econometrics, 160, 349-371.
Kley, T., S. Volgushev, H. Dette and M. Hallin (2016) Quantile spectral processes: Asymptotic analysis and inference, Bernoulli, forthcoming.
Koenker, R. and W.G. Bassett (1978) Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 46, 33-50.
Kosorok, M. R. (2007) Introduction to empirical processes and semiparametric inference,
Springer Science and Business Media.
Kuan, C.-M. and W.-M. Lee (2006) Robust M tests without consistent estimation of the
asymptotic covariance matrix, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101,
1264-1275.
Kunsch, H.R. (1989) The Jackknife and the Bootstrap for General Stationary Observations,
The Annals of Statistics, 17, 1217-1241.
Laurini, M.P., L.G.C. Furlani and M.S. Portugal (2008), Empirical market microstructure:
An analysis of the BRL/US$ exchange rate market, Emerging Markets Review, Volume
9, Issue 4, December 2008, Pages 247-265
A.25
Lettau, M. and S.C. Ludvigson (2010) Measuring and modeling variation in the risk-return
trade-off, in Handbook of Financial Econometrics, ed. by Y. Ait-Sahalia and L.P.
Hansen, vol. 1, 617-690, North-Holland.
Li, T.H. (2008) Laplace periodogram for time series analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(482), 757-768.
Li, T.H. (2012) Quantile periodograms, Journal of the American Statistical Association,
107(498), 765-776.
Li, T. H. (2014) Quantile Periodogram and Time-Dependent Variance, Journal of Time
Series Analysis, 35(4), 322-340.
Linton, O. and Y-J. Whang (2007) The quantilogram: With an application to evaluating
directional predictability, Journal of Econometrics, 141, 250-282.
Lobato, I.N. (2001) Testing that a dependent process is uncorrelated, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 96, 1066-1076.
Mandelbrot, B.B., (1963) The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business
(Chicago) 36, 394–419. Reprinted in Cootner (1964), as Chapter E 14 of Mandelbrot
(1997), in Telser (2000), and several other collections of papers on finance.
Mikosch, T., and C. Starica (2000) Limit Theory for the sample autocorrelations and extremes of a GARCH(1,1) process, Annals of Statistics, 28, 1427-1451.
Patton, A., D.N. Politis and H. White (2009) Correction to ”automatic block-length selection
for dependent bootstrap” by D. Politis and H. White, Econometric Reviews, 28, 372-375.
Pierce, D.A. and L.D. Haugh (1977) Causality in temporal systems: Characterization and a
survey, Journal of Econometrics, 5, 265-293.
Politis, D.N. and J.P. Romano (1994) The stationary bootstrap, Journal of the American
Statistical Association, 89, 1303-1313.
Politis, D.N. and H. White (2004) Automatic block-length selection for dependent bootstrap,
Econometric Reviews, 23, 53-70.
Pollard, D. (1991) Asymptotics for least absolute deviation regression estimators, Econometric Theory, 7, 186-199.
Rachev, S. and S. Mittnik (2000) Stable Paretian Models in Finance. Wiley, New York.
Rio, E. (1997) About the Lindeberg method for strongly mixing sequences, ESAIM: Probability and Statistics, 1, 35-61.
Rio, E. (2013) Inequalities and limit theorems for weakly dependent sequences, working
paper.
A.26
Ruschendorf, L. (1976) Asymptotic distributions of multivariate rank order statistics, The
Annals of Statistics, 4, 912-923.
Segers, J. (2012) Asymptotics of empirical copula processes under non-restrictive smoothness
assumptions, Bernoulli, 18, 764-782.
Shao, X. (2010) A self-normalized approach to confidence interval construction in time series,
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 72, 343-366.
Stute, W. (1984) The Oscillation Behavior of Empirical Processes: The Multivariate Case,
The Annals of Probability, 12, 361-379.
Sun, Y. and M.S. Kim (2012) Simple and powerful GMM over-identification tests with
accurate size, Journal of Econometrics, 166, 267-281.
Sun,
Y., P.C.B. Phillips and S. Jin (2008) Optimal bandwidth Selection in
Heteroskedasticity-autocorrelation robust testing, Econometrica, 76, 175-194.
van der Vaart, A.W. and J.A. Wellner (1996) Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes,
Springer, New York.
White, H., T-H. Kim and S. Manganelli (2012) VAR for VaR: Measuring tail dependence
using multivariate regression quantiles, working paper.
A.27
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1301.6890v1 [math.AC] 29 Jan 2013
TIGHT CLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO A MULTIPLICATIVELY
CLOSED SUBSET OF AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
RODNEY Y. SHARP
Abstract. Let R be a (commutative Noetherian) local ring of prime characteristic
that is F -pure. This paper studies a certain finite set I of radical ideals of R that
is naturally defined by the injective envelope E of the simple R-module. This
set I contains 0 and R, and is closed under taking primary components. For a
multiplicatively closed subset S of R, the concept of tight closure with respect to S,
or S-tight closure, is discussed, together with associated concepts of S-test element
and S-test ideal. It is shown that an ideal a of R belongs to I if and only if it is
the S ′ -test ideal of R for some multiplicatively closed subset S ′ of R. When R is
complete, I is also ‘closed under taking test ideals’, in the following sense: for each
proper ideal c in I, it turns out that R/c is again F -pure, and if g and h are the
unique ideals of R that contain c and are such that g/c is the (tight closure) test
ideal of R/c and h/c is the big test ideal of R/c, then both g and h belong to I.
The paper ends with several examples.
0. Introduction
This paper is concerned with a (commutative Noetherian) local ring R having
maximal ideal m and prime characteristic p; the Frobenius homomorphism f : R −→
R, for which f (r) = r p for all r ∈ R, will play a central rôle. Let us (temporarily) use
Rf to denote the Abelian group R considered as an (R, R)-bimodule with r1 · r · r2 =
r1 rr2p for all r, r1 , r2 ∈ R.
The ring R is said to be F -pure if and only if, for every R-module M, the map
αM : M −→ Rf ⊗R M for which αM (m) = 1 ⊗ m, for all m ∈ M, is injective.
This property can be reformulated in terms of certain left modules over the skew
polynomial ring R[x, f ] associated to R and f in the indeterminate x over R, which
we refer to as the Frobenius skew polynomial ring over R. Recall that R[x, f ] is, as a
left R-module, freely generated by (xi )i∈N0 (we use N0 (respectively N) to denote the
set
(respectively positive) integers), and so consists of all polynomials
Pnof non-negative
i
i=0 ri x , where n ∈ N0 and r0 , . . . , rn ∈ R; however, its multiplication is subject to
the rule xr = f (r)x = r p x for all
Lr∞∈ R. Note that R[x, f ] can benconsidered as a
positively-graded ring R[x, f ] = n=0 R[x, f ]n , with R[x, f ]n = Rx for n ∈ N0 . If
we endow Rxn with its natural structure as an (R, R)-bimodule (inherited from its
being a graded component of R[x, f ]), then Rxn is isomorphic (as (R, R)-bimodule)
Date: June 22, 2017.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 13A35, 16S36, 13E05, 13E10, 13H05; Secondary 13J10.
Key words and phrases. Commutative Noetherian ring, local ring, prime characteristic, Frobenius
homomorphism, tight closure, test element, big test element, test ideal, big test ideal, excellent ring,
Frobenius skew polynomial ring, F -pure ring, complete local ring.
1
2
RODNEY Y. SHARP
to R viewed as a left R-module in the natural way and as a right R-module via f n ,
the nth iterate of the Frobenius ring homomorphism. In particular, Rx ∼
= Rf as
(R, R)-bimodules.
A left R[x, f ]-module G is said to be x-torsion-free precisely when xg = 0, where
g ∈ G, implies that g = 0. We can say that R is F -pure if and
L only if,n for every
R-module M, the graded left R[x, f ]-module R[x, f ] ⊗R M =
n∈N0 Rx ⊗R M is
x-torsion-free. We shall also use the following alternative characterization of F -purity.
0.1. Theorem ([9, Theorem 3.2]). The local ring (R, m) is F -pure if and only if the
R-module structure on ER (R/m), the injective envelope of the simple R-module, can
be extended to an x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module structure.
In the paper [7], some useful properties of x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-modules were
developed, and it is appropriate to recall some of them at this point. L
The graded two-sided ideals of R[x, f ] are just the subsets of the form n∈N0 an xn ,
where (an )n∈N0 is an ascending sequence of ideals of R. (Of course, such a sequence
a0 ⊆ a1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ an ⊆ · · · is eventually stationary.) Let H be a left R[x, f ]-module.
An R[x, f ]-submodule of H is said to be a special annihilator submodule of H if it
has the form
annH (A) := {h ∈ H : θh = 0 for all θ ∈ A}
for some graded two-sided ideal A of R[x, f ].
We shall use A(H) to denote the set of special annihilator submodules of H.
The graded annihilator gr-annR[x,f ] H of H is defined to be the largestL
graded twosided ideal of R[x, f ] that annihilates H. Note that, if gr-annR[x,f ] H = n∈N0 an xn ,
then a0 = (0 :R H), which we shall sometimes refer to as the R-annihilator of H.
We shall use I(H) (or IR (H) when it is desirable to specify the ring R) to denote
the set of R-annihilators of R[x, f ]-submodules of H.
0.2. The Basic Correspondence ([7, §1, §3]). Let G be an x-torsion-free left module
over R[x, f ].
(i) By [7, Lemma 1.9], the members of I(G) are all radical ideals of R; they are
referred to as the G-special R-ideals;L
in fact, the graded annihilator of an
R[x, f ]-submodule L of G is equal to n∈N0 axn , where a = (0 :R L).
(ii) By [7, Proposition 1.11], there is an order-reversing bijection, Θ : A(G) −→
I(G) given by
Θ : N 7−→ gr-annR[x,f ] N ∩ R = (0 :R N).
The inverse bijection, Θ−1 : I(G) −→ A(G), also order-reversing, is given by
Θ−1 : b 7−→ annG (bR[x, f ]).
(iii) By [7, Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.7], the set of G-special R-ideals is precisely the set of all finite intersections of prime G-special R-ideals (provided
one includes the empty intersection, R, which corresponds under the bijection
of part (ii) to the zero special annihilator submodule of G). In symbols,
I(G) = {p1 ∩ · · · ∩ pt : t ∈ N0 and p1 , . . . , pt ∈ I(G) ∩ Spec(R)} .
(iv) By [7, Corollary 3.11], when G is Artinian as an R-module, the sets I(G)
and A(G) are both finite.
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
3
Thus, if (R, m) is F -pure and we endow ER (R/m) with a structure as x-torsionfree left R[x, f ]-module (this is possible, by Theorem 0.1), then the resulting set
I(ER (R/m)) is finite. In fact, rather more can be said.
0.3. Theorem ([9, Corollary 4.11]). Suppose that (R, m) is F -pure and local. Then
the left R[x, f ]-module R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m) is x-torsion-free, and, furthermore, the
set I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) of (R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m))-special R-ideals, is finite.
In fact, for any x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module structure on ER (R/m) that extends its R-module structure (and such exist, by Theorem 0.1), we have
I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) ⊆ I(ER (R/m)),
and the latter set is finite.
It turns out that, in the situation of Theorem 0.3, all the minimal prime ideals
of R belong to I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)), and the smallest ideal of positive height in
I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) is the big test ideal of R, that is, the ideal generated by all
big test elements for R. (A reminder about big test elements is included in the next
section.)
In short, to each F -pure local ring (R, m) of characteristic p, there is naturally
associated a finite set of radical ideals I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) of R, and the smallest
member of positive height in this set has significance for tight closure theory. The
purpose of this paper is to address the following question: what can be said about the
other members of I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m))? We shall show that, for each multiplicatively closed subset S of R, one can define reasonable concepts of S-tight closure,
S-test element and S-test ideal; it turns out that an ideal b of R is a member of
I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) if and only if it is the S-test ideal of R for some choice of
multiplicatively closed subset S of R.
We shall also show that, when R is complete, I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) is ‘closed
under taking (big) test ideals’, in the following sense: it turns out that, for each
proper ideal c ∈ I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)), the ring R/c is again F -pure, and the set
I(R[x, f ] ⊗R ER (R/m)) has among its membership the unique ideals g and h of R
such that g, h ⊇ c and g/c = τe(R/c), the big test ideal of R/c, and h/c = τ (R/c), the
test ideal of R/c.
I am grateful to Mordechai Katzman for helpful discussions about the material in
this paper.
1. Internal S-tight closure
1.1. Notation. From this point onwards in the paper, R will denote a commutative
Noetherian ring of prime characteristic p. We shall only assume that R is local when
this is explicitly stated; then, the notation ‘(R, m)’ will denote that m is the maximal
ideal of R. As in tight closure theory, we use R◦ to denote the complement in R of
the union of the minimal prime ideals of R. The Frobenius homomorphism on R will
always be denoted by f .
We shall use Φ (or ΦR when it is desirable to specify which ring is being considered) to denote the functor R[x, f ] ⊗R • from the category of R-modules (and
all R-homomorphisms) to the category of all N0 -graded left R[x, f ]-modules (and all
homogeneous R[x, f ]-homomorphisms). For an R-module M, we shall identify Φ(M)
4
RODNEY Y. SHARP
L
n
with
n∈N0 Rx ⊗R M, and (sometimes) identify its 0th component R ⊗R M with
M, in the obvious ways.
For n ∈ Z, we shall denote the nth component of a Z-graded module L by Ln .
Throughout the paper, S will denote a multiplicatively closed subset of R. (We
require that each multiplicatively closed subset of R contains 1.)
Also throughout the paper, H will denote a left R[x, f ]-module and G will denote
an x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module.
1.2. Definitions. We define the internal S-tight closure of zero in H, denoted ∆S (H)
(or ∆SR (H)), to be the R[x, f ]-submodule of H given by
∆S (H) = {h ∈ H : there exists s ∈ S with sxn h = 0 for all n ≫ 0} .
Note that if the left R[x, f ]-module H is Z-graded, then ∆S (H) is a graded submodule.
Let M be an R-module, and consider Φ(M), as in 1.1. Now ∆S (Φ(M)) is a graded
R[x, f ]-submodule of Φ(M); we refer to the 0th component of ∆S (Φ(M)) as the Stight closure of 0 in M, or the tight closure with respect to S of 0 in M, and denote
∗,S
it by 0∗,S
when it is clear what M is).
M (or by 0
∗,S
Thus 0M is the set of all elements m of M for which there exists s ∈ S such that,
∗,R◦
is the usual
for all n ≫ 0, we have sxn ⊗ m = 0 in Rxn ⊗R M. In particular, 0M
tight closure of 0 in M. (See M. Hochster and C. Huneke [2, §8].)
Now let N be an R-submodule of M. The inverse image of 0∗,S
M/N under the natural
epimorphism M −→ M/N is defined to be the S-tight closure of N in M, and is
∗,S
∗,S
denoted by NM
or N ∗,S . Thus NM
is the set of all elements m of M for which there
exists s ∈ S such that, for all n ≫ 0, the element sxn ⊗ m of Rxn ⊗R M belongs to
∗,R◦
the image of Rxn ⊗R N in Rxn ⊗R M. Note that NM
is the usual tight closure of
N in M. (See Hochster–Huneke [2, §8].) I am grateful to the referee for pointing out
that the S-tight closure of N in M is the tight closure of N in M with respect to C
in the sense of Hochster–Huneke [2, Definition (10.1)], where C is {sR : s ∈ S}, the
family of principal ideals generated by elements of S, directed by reverse inclusion ⊇.
The S-tight closure of a in R is referred to simply as the S-tight closure of a and
is denoted by a∗,S . The fact that there is a homogeneous R[x, f ]-isomorphism
M
n
R/a[p ]
R[x, f ] ⊗R (R/a) ∼
=
n∈N0
n
(where the right-hand side has the left R[x, f ]-module structure for which x(r+a[p ] ) =
n+1
r p + a[p ] for all r ∈ R) enables one to conclude that
n
n
a∗,S = r ∈ R : there exists s ∈ S with sr p ∈ a[p ] for all n ≫ 0 .
◦
Thus a∗,R is the usual tight closure a∗ of a. (See Hochster–Huneke [2, §3].)
1.3. Examples. In the situation of Definition 1.2, let S, T be multiplicatively closed
subsets of R with S ⊆ T . Then clearly ∆S (H) ⊆ ∆T (H).
(i) Note that {1} is a multiplicatively closed subset of R, and
∆{1} (H) = {h ∈ H : xn h = 0 for all n ≫ 0}
= {h ∈ H : there exists n ∈ N0 with xn h = 0},
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
5
the x-torsion submodule Γx (H) of H. Thus Γx (H) ⊆ ∆S (H) and therefore
(0 :R ∆S (H)) ⊆ (0 :R Γx (H)).
(ii) Let M be an R-module and let h, n ∈ N0 . Endow Rxn and Rxh with their
natural structures as (R, R)-bimodules (inherited from their being graded
components of R[x, f ]). Then there is an isomorphism of (left) R-modules φ :
∼
=
Rxn+h ⊗R M −→ Rxn ⊗R (Rxh ⊗R M) for which φ(rxn+h ⊗m) = rxn ⊗(xh ⊗m)
for all r ∈ R and m ∈ M.
One can use isomorphisms like that described in the above paragraph to
see that
∗,S
∗,S
∆S (R[x, f ] ⊗R M) = 0∗,S
M ⊕ 0Rx⊗R M ⊕ · · · ⊕ 0Rxn ⊗R M ⊕ · · · .
1.4. Notation. We define MS (G), for the x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module G, to be
the set of minimal members (with respect to inclusion) of the set
{p ∈ Spec(R) ∩ I(G) : p ∩ S 6= ∅}
of prime G-special R-ideals that meet S. T
When MS (G) is finite, we shall set b := p∈MS (G) p, although we shall write bS,G
for b when it is desirable to indicate S and G; in that case, it follows from 0.2(iii) that
b is the smallest member of I(G) that meets S (and, in particular, b is contained in
every other member of I(G) that meets S). (In the special case where MS (G) = ∅,
we interpret b as R, the intersection of the empty family of prime ideals of R.)
1.5. Proposition. Consider the x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module G. The set MS (G)
(see 1.4) is finite if and only if (0 :R ∆S (G)) ∩ S 6= ∅.
When these conditions are satisfied, and b denotes the intersection of the prime
ideals in the finite set MS (G), then
∆S (G) = annG (bR[x, f ])
and
(0 :R ∆S (G)) = b.
Proof. (⇐) Set c := (0 :R ∆S (G)) and assume that there exists s ∈ c ∩ S. Since G is
x-torsion-free and ∆S (G) is an R[x, f ]-submodule of G, it follows from 0.2(i) that c
is radical and gr-annR[x,f ] ∆S (G) = cR[x, f ]. Now
annG (cR[x, f ]) ⊆ annG ((sR)R[x, f ]) ⊆ ∆S (G) ⊆ annG (cR[x, f ]),
and so annG (cR[x, f ]) = ∆S (G). Note that c ∈ I(G).
If c = R, then ∆S (G) = 0, so that MS (G) is empty because a p ∈ I(G) ∩ Spec(R)
with p ∩ S 6= ∅ must satisfy annG (pR[x, f ]) ⊆ ∆S (G) = 0, and this leads to a
contradiction to 0.2(ii). We therefore suppose that c 6= R.
Let c = p1 ∩ · · · ∩ pt be the minimal primary decomposition of the (radical) ideal c.
By [7, Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.7], the prime ideals p1 , . . . , pt all belong to I(G);
they all meet S. Since Spec(R) satisfies the descending chain condition, each member
of {p′ ∈ Spec(R) ∩ I(G) : p′ ∩ S 6= ∅} contains a member of MS (G). In particular,
each of p1 , . . . , pt contains a member of MS (G).
Now let p ∈ MS (G). Since p meets S, we must have that annG (pR[x, f ]) ⊆
∆S (G) = annG (cR[x, f ]). It now follows from the inclusion-reversing bijective correspondence of 0.2(ii) that p ⊇ c, so that p contains one of p1 , . . . , pt . We can therefore
conclude that p1 , . . . , pt are precisely the minimal members of
{p ∈ I(G) ∩ Spec(R) : p ∩ S 6= ∅}.
6
RODNEY Y. SHARP
Therefore MS (G) is finite.
(⇒) Assume that MS (G) is finite. Then b is the smallest member of I(G)
that meets S. Consequently, annG (bR[x, f ]) ⊆ ∆S (G). Let g ∈ ∆S (G), so that
there L
exist s′ ∈ S and n0 ∈ N0 such that s′ xn g = 0 for all n ≥ n0 . Thus g ∈
annG ( n≥n0 Rs′ xn ) =: J, a special annihilator submodule of G. Let b′ be the Gspecial R-ideal that corresponds toL
this special annihilator submodule (in the bijective
correspondence of 0.2(ii)). Since n≥n0 Rs′ xn ⊆ gr-annR[x,f ] J = b′ R[x, f ], we have
s′ ∈ b′ , so that b′ ∩ S 6= ∅. Therefore b′ ⊇ b, and g ∈ J = annG (b′ R[x, f ]) ⊆
annG (bR[x, f ]). Therefore ∆S (G) ⊆ annG (bR[x, f ]). We conclude that ∆S (G) =
annG (bR[x, f ]), and that (0 :R ∆S (G)) = (0 :R annG (bR[x, f ])) = b. All the claims
in the statement of the proposition have now been proved.
1.6. Definition. An S-test element for R is an element s ∈ S such that, for every
R-module M and every j ∈ N0 , the element sxj annihilates 1 ⊗ m ∈ (Φ(M))0 for
every m ∈ 0∗,S
M . The ideal of R generated by all the S-test elements for R is called
the S-test ideal of R, and denoted by τ S (R).
One of the aims of this paper is to show that S-test elements for R exist when R
is F -pure and local.
This is a suitable point at which to remind the reader of some of the classical
concepts related to tight closure test elements.
1.7. Reminder. Recall that a test element for modules for R is an element c ∈ R◦
such that, for every finitely generated R-module M and every j ∈ N0 , the element cxj
annihilates 1 ⊗ m ∈ (Φ(M))0 for every m ∈ 0∗M . The phrase ‘for modules’ is inserted
because Hochster and Huneke have also considered a concept of a test element for
ideals for R, which is defined to be an element c ∈ R◦ such that, for every cyclic Rmodule M and every j ∈ N0 , the element cxj annihilates 1 ⊗ m ∈ (Φ(M))0 for every
m ∈ 0∗M . When R is reduced and excellent, the concepts of test element for modules
and test element for ideals for R coincide: see [2, Discussion (8.6) and Proposition
(8.15)].
T
Hochster and Huneke define the test ideal τ (R) of R to be M (0 :R 0∗M ), where
the intersection is taken over all finitely generated R-modules M. In [2, Proposition
(8.23)(b)] they show that, if R has a test element for modules, then τ (R) is the ideal
generated by the test elements for modules, and τ (R) ∩ R◦ is the set of test elements
for modules.
1.8. Reminder. Recall also that a big test element for R is an element c ∈ R◦
such that, for every R-module M and every j ∈ N0 , the element cxj annihilates
1 ⊗ m ∈ (Φ(M))0 for every m ∈ 0∗M . We let τe(R) denote the ideal generated by all
big test elements for R, and call this the big test ideal of R.
Note that an R◦ -test element for R, in the sense of Definition 1.6, is just a big test
element for R.
Recall that an injective cogenerator of R is an injective R-module E with the
property that, for every R-module M and every non-zero element m ∈ M, there
exists
an R-homomorphism φ : M −→ E such that φ(m) 6= 0. As R is Noetherian,
L
m∈Max(R) ER (R/m), where Max(R) denotes the set of maximal ideals of R, is one
injective cogenerator of R.
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
7
L
1.9. Reminders. Let E := m∈Max(R) ER (R/m), an injective cogenerator of R.
(i) Recall from Hochster–Huneke [2, Definition (8.19)] that the finitistic tight
S ∗
closure of 0 in E, denoted by 0∗fg
E , is defined to be
M 0M , where the union
is taken over all finitely generated R-submodules M of E. It was shown in
[2, Proposition (8.23)(d)] that τ (R) = (0 :R 0∗fg
E ).
∗fg
∗
(ii) It is conjectured that (0 :R 0E ) = (0 :R 0E ). This conjecture is known to be
true
(a) if R is an excellent Gorenstein local ring (see K. E. Smith [12, p. 48]);
(b) if R is the localization of a finitely generated N0 -graded algebra over an
F -finite field K (of characteristic p and having K as its component of
degree 0) at its unique homogeneous maximal ideal (see G. Lyubeznik
and K. E. Smith [5, Corollary 3.4]);
(c) if R is a Cohen–Macaulay local ring which is Gorenstein on its punctured
spectrum (see Lyubeznik–Smith [6, Theorem 8.8]); or
(d) if (R, m) is local and an isolated singularity (see Lyubeznik–Smith [6,
Theorem 8.12]).
(iii) It was shown in [10, Theorem 3.3] that if R has a big test element, then the
◦
big test ideal τe(R) of R is equal to (0 :R ∆R (Φ(E))), and the set of big test
◦
elements for R is (0 :R ∆R (Φ(E))) ∩ R◦ .
2. Existence of S-test elements in F -pure local rings
Theorem 0.3 was proved by means of an ‘embedding theorem’ [9, Theorem 4.10].
Similar embedding theorems were established in [8, Theorem 3.5] and [10, Theorem
3.2]. In this paper, the ideas underlying those theorems are going to be pursued
further, and so we begin with three remarks and a lemma that can be viewed as
addenda to [10, §2].
The notation in this section is as described in 1.1.
e denote the graded companion of H described in [10, Example
2.1. Remark. Let H
S (H), so that (0 : ∆S (H))
e = ∆^
e = (0 :R ∆S (H)).
2.1]. It is easy to check that ∆S (H)
R
2.2. Remark. Let (H (λ) )λ∈Λ be a non-empty
family of Z-graded left R[x, f ]-modules,
Q
and consider the graded product ′λ∈Λ H (λ) of the H (λ) , described in [8, Lemma 2.1]
and [10, Example 2.2]. It is routine to check that, if there
ideal d0 of R such
Q′ is an
(λ)
H
= d0 .
that (0 :R ∆S (H (λ) )) = d0 for all λ ∈ Λ, then 0 :R ∆S
λ∈Λ
L
2.3. Remark. Assume that the left R[x, f ]-module H =
n∈Z Hn is Z-graded; let
t ∈ Z. Denote by H(t) the result of application of the tth shift functor to H; this
is described in [10, Example 2.3]. It is clear that ∆S (H(t)) = ∆S (H)(t), so that
(0 :R ∆S (H(t))) = (0 :R ∆S (H)).
L
2.4. Lemma. Let b, h ∈ N and let W := n≥b Wn be a graded left R[x, f ]-module.
Let (gi )i∈I be a family of arbitrary elements of Wb . Consider the h-place extension
exten(W ; (gi )i∈I ; h) of W by (gi )i∈I , defined in [9, Definition 4.5] and [10, §2]. Then
(0 :R ∆S (exten(W ; (gi )i∈I ; h))) = (0 :R ∆S (W )).
Proof. This can be proved by making obvious modifications to the proof, presented in
◦
◦
[10, Proposition 2.4(i)], that (0 :R ∆R (exten(W ; (gi )i∈I ; h))) = (0 :R ∆R (W )).
8
RODNEY Y. SHARP
The above remarks and lemma are helpful for use in the proof of some of the claims
in the following Embedding Theorem.
2.5. Embedding Theorem. (See [10, Theorem 3.2].) Let E be an injective
Lcogenerator of R. Assume that there exists an N0 -graded left R[x, f ]-module H = n∈N0 Hn
such that H0 is R-isomorphic to E.
Let M be an R-module. Then there is a family L(n) n∈N0 of N0 -graded left R[x, f ]modules, where L(n) is an n-place extension of the −nth shift of a graded product
of copies of H (for each n ∈ N0 ), for which there exists a homogeneous R[x, f ]monomorphism
Y′
M
L(n) =: K.
(Rxi ⊗R M) −→
ν : Φ(M) =
i∈N0
n∈N0
Consequently, (0 :R ∆S (H)) = (0 :R ∆S (K)) ⊆ (0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))).
Furthermore, if H is x-torsion-free, then so too is Φ(M), and I(Φ(M)) ⊆ I(H)
and (0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))) ∈ I(H).
Proof. The existence of K and ν with the stated properties were proved in [10, Theorem 3.2].
The existence of the R[x, f ]-monomorphism ν shows that
(0 :R ∆S (K)) ⊆ (0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))),
while Remarks 2.2 and 2.3 and Lemma 2.4 show that (0 :R ∆S (K)) = (0 :R ∆S (H)).
Now suppose H is x-torsion-free. It follows from [8, Lemmas 2.3 and 2.8] that K is
x-torsion-free and that I(K) = I(H). The existence of the R[x, f ]-monomorphism ν
shows that Φ(M) is x-torsion-free and R[x, f ]-isomorphic to an R[x, f ]-submodule of
K; therefore I(Φ(M)) ⊆ I(K) = I(H). Finally, (0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))) ∈ I(Φ(M)).
2.6. Theorem. Suppose that the local ring (R, m) is F -pure. Then R has an S-test
element.
In more detail, set E := ER (R/m). Recall that bS,Φ(E) denotes the intersection of all
the minimal members of the set {p ∈ Spec(R) ∩ I(Φ(E)) : p ∩ S 6= ∅} (see 1.4). Then
S ∩bS,Φ(E) is (non-empty and) equal to the set of S-test elements for R. Furthermore,
bS,Φ(E) = (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))).
Proof. By Theorem 0.3, the set I(Φ(E)) of Φ(E)-special R-ideals is finite. Consequently, MS (Φ(E)) is finite, and Proposition 1.5 shows that (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E)))∩S 6= ∅.
We use the Embedding Theorem 2.5 with Φ(E) playing the rôle of H. We conclude
that, for every R-module M, we have
(0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))) ⊆ (0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))).
Thus (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))) is precisely the set of elements of R that annihilate ∆S (Φ(M))
for every R-module M. Since ∆S (Φ(M)) is an R[x, f ]-submodule of Φ(M) (for each
R-module M), it follows that (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))) ∩ S (which is non-empty) is the set of
S-test elements for R.
It also follows from Proposition 1.5 that
∆S (Φ(E)) = annΦ(E) (bS,Φ(E) R[x, f ]) and (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))) = bS,Φ(E) .
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
9
In our applications of these ideas, we shall frequently take S to be the complement
in R of the union of finitely many prime ideals. In that case, a little more can be
said.
2.7. S
Lemma. Let A be a commutative ring and let p1 , . . . , pn ∈ Spec(A). Set T :=
A \ ni=1 pi , and let a be an ideal of A such that a ∩ T 6= ∅. Then a can be generated
by elements of a ∩ T .
Proof. Let a′ be the ideal of A generated by a ∩ T . Then
a ⊆ (a ∩ T ) ∪ (a ∩ (A \ T )) ⊆ a′ ∪ p1 ∪ · · · ∪ pn .
Since a ∩ T 6= ∅, we have, for every i ∈ {1, . . . , n}, that a 6⊆ pi . Therefore, by the
Prime Avoidance Theorem (in the form given in [4, Theorem 81]), we must have
a ⊆ a′ .
Sn
2.8. Corollary. Suppose that the local ring (R, m) is F -pure, and S = R \ i=1 pi ,
where p1 , . . . , pn ∈ Spec(R). It was shown in Theorem 2.6 that R has an S-test
element. Set E := ER (R/m). The S-test ideal of R, that is, the ideal of R generated
by all S-test elements for R, is bS,Φ(E) , the smallest member of I(Φ(E)) that meets
S. In symbols, τ S (R) = bS,Φ(E) .
In particular, the big test ideal τe(R) is the smallest member of I(Φ(E)) of positive
height. (We interpret the height of the improper ideal R as ∞.)
Proof. We saw in Theorem 2.6 that the set S ∩ bS,Φ(E) is non-empty and equal to the
set of S-test elements for R. By Lemma 2.7, the ideal bS,Φ(E) can be generated by
elements of S ∩ bS,Φ(E) .
For the final claim, take S = R◦ and note that a proper ideal of R has positive
height if and only if it meets R◦ .
We shall actually use variations of the Embedding Theorem 2.5 in Proposition 2.10
below.
2.9. Definitions. Suppose that (R, m) is local and F -pure; set E := ER (R/m). Let
M be an R-module.
S
(i) We define the finitistic S-tight closure 0∗fg,S
of 0 in M to be N 0∗,S
M
N , where
the union is taken over all finitely generated submodulesTN of M.
(ii) We define the finitistic S-test ideal τ fg,S (R) of R to be L (0 :R 0∗,S
L ), where
the intersection is taken over all finitely generated R-modules L.
2.10. Proposition. Suppose that (R, m) is local and F -pure; set E := ER (R/m).
(i) For every R-module M, we have I(Φ(M)) ⊆ I(Φ(E)) and (0 :R ∆S (Φ(E))) ⊆
(0 :R ∆S (Φ(M))) ∈ I(Φ(E)).
∗fg,S
(ii) The ideal (0 :R 0E
) annihilates (0 :R 0∗,S
L ) for every finitely generated Rmodule L.
∗fg,S
(iii) We have τ fg,S (R) = (0 :R 0E
), and this ideal belongs to I(Φ(E)).
∗,S
(iv) For every R-module M, we have (0 :R 0∗,S
E ) ⊆ (0 :R 0M ).
(v) We have bS,Φ(E) = (0 :R 0∗,S
E ). Consequently, when S is the complement in R
of the union of finitely many prime ideals, then the S-test ideal τ S (R) of R
is equal to (0 :R 0∗,S
E ).
10
RODNEY Y. SHARP
Proof. (i) This follows from the Embedding
T Theorem 2.5, with H taken as Φ(E).
(ii) By Krull’s Intersection Theorem, n∈N mn L = 0. We can therefore express the
zero submodule of L as the intersection of a countable family (Qi )i∈N of irreducible
submodules of finite colength. (A submodule of L is said to be irreducible if it is proper
and cannot be expressed as the intersection of two strictly larger submodules.) Note
that ER (L/Qi ) = E for all i ∈ N.
Q
The R-monomorphism Λ0 : L −→ i∈N L/Qi for which λ0 (g) = (g + Qi )i∈N for all
g ∈ L can be extended to a homogeneous R[x, f ]-homomorphism
!
Y′ M
Y′
M
Rxn ⊗R (L/Qi )
Φ(L/Qi ) =
Rxn ⊗R L −→
λ : Φ(L) =
n∈N0
i∈N
i∈N
n∈N0
whose restriction to the nth component of Φ(L), for n ∈ N0 , satisfies λ(rxn ⊗ g) =
(rxn ⊗ (g + Qi ))i∈N for all r ∈ R and g ∈ L. It is clear that the R-monomorphism
Q
∗,S
λ0 (that is, the component of degree 0 of λ) maps 0∗,S
L into
i∈N 0L/Qi . But L/Qi is
R-isomorphic to a finitely generated submodule of E, and so 0∗,S
L/Qi is annihilated by
∗fg,S
∗fg,S
(0 :R 0E
) (for all i ∈ N). It follows that 0∗,S
).
LT is annihilated by (0 :R 0E
∗fg,S
∗,S
(iii) By part (ii), we have (0 :R 0E ) ⊆ L (0 :R 0L ), where the intersection is
∗fg,S
taken over all finitely generated R-modules L. Thus (0 :R 0E
) ⊆ τ fg,S (R). On the
S
other hand, by definition, τ fg,S (R) annihilates N 0∗,S
N , where the union is taken over
∗fg,S
all finitely generated submodules N of E; therefore τ fg,S (R) ⊆ (0 :R 0E
).
For each finitely generated R-module L,
∗,S
∗,S
∆S (Φ(L)) = 0∗,S
L ⊕ 0Rx⊗R L ⊕ · · · ⊕ 0Rxn ⊗R L ⊕ · · · ,
T
by Example 1.3(ii), so that (0 :R ∆S (Φ(L))) = n∈N0 (0 :R 0∗,S
Rxn ⊗R L ). Note that
Rxn ⊗R L is a finitely generated R-module, for each n ∈ N0 . It therefore follows that
T
T
∗,S
S
L (0 :R ∆ (Φ(L))) =
L (0 :R 0L ),
where in both cases the intersection is taken over
generated R-modules L.
T all finitely
fg,S
S
Therefore τ (R) is equal to the above ideal L (0 :R ∆ (Φ(L))), and the latter is in
I(Φ(E)) because each (0 :R ∆S (Φ(L))) is (by part (i)) and I(Φ(E)) is closed under
taking arbitrary intersections (by [7, Corollary 1.12]).
(iv) By [10, Lemma 3.1], there is a family of graded left R[x, f ]-modules H (λ) λ∈Λ ,
with each H (λ) equal to Φ(E), and a homogeneous R[x, f ]-homomorphism
Y′
H (λ)
µ : Φ(M) −→
λ∈Λ
such that its component µ0 of degree 0 is a monomorphism. Since µn (sxn ⊗ m) =
sxn µ0 (m) for all m ∈ M, s ∈ S and n ∈ N0 , it follows that the R-monomorphism
∗,S
∗,S
µ0 maps 0∗,S
M into a direct product of copies of 0E . Therefore (0 :R 0E ) annihilates
0∗,S
M . Note that this is true for each R-module M.
(v) It now follows from part (iv) and the fact (see Example 1.3(ii)) that
∗,S
∗,S
∆S (Φ(E)) = 0∗,S
E ⊕ 0Rx⊗R E ⊕ · · · ⊕ 0Rxn ⊗R E ⊕ · · ·
S
S
S,Φ(E)
that (0 :R 0∗,S
, by Theorem 2.6.
E ) = (0 :R ∆ (Φ(E))). But (0 :R ∆ (Φ(E))) = b
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
11
When S is the complement in R of the union of finitely many prime ideals, it follows
from Corollary 2.8 that τ S (R) = bS,Φ(E) .
2.11. Remarks. Suppose that (R, m) is local and F -pure; set E := ER (R/m).
(i) In the special case in which S is taken to be R◦ , Proposition 2.10(v) reduces
◦
to the (probably well-known) result that the big test ideal τe(R) = τ R (R) of
R is equal to (0 :R 0∗E ).
(ii) In the special case in which S is taken to be R◦ , the first part of Proposition 2.10(iii) reduces to (a special case of) a result of Hochster–Huneke [2,
Proposition (8.23)(d)] about the test ideal τ (R):
◦
τ (R) = τ fg,R (R) = (0 :R 0∗fg,R
) = (0 :R 0∗fg
E
E ).
◦
We have seen that, over an F -pure local ring (R, m), the set I(Φ(E)) (where
E := ER (R/m)) of radical ideals includes the test ideal τ (R), the big test ideal
◦
◦
τe(R) = bR ,Φ(E) = τ R (R) of R and the S-test ideal, for each multiplicatively closed
subset S of R which is the complement in R of the union of finitely many prime
ideals. It is natural to ask whether every member of the finite set I(Φ(E)) occurs
as the S ′ -test ideal for some multiplicatively closed subset S ′ of R. In Theorem 2.12
below, we shall answer this question in the affirmative.
2.12. Theorem. Suppose that the local ring (R, m) is F -pure, and set E := ER (R/m).
Let a ∈ I(Φ(E)). Then there exists a multiplicatively closed subset S of R such that
a is the S-test ideal of R. Moreover, S can be taken to be the complement in R of the
union of finitely many prime ideals.
Proof. If a = R, then we can take S = {1} or S = R \ m. We therefore assume
henceforth in this proof that a is proper.
Let p1 , . . . , pt be the (distinct) associated prime ideals of a; recall from [7, Theorem
3.6 and Corollary 3.7] that they all belong to I(Φ(E)). Let T be the set of all prime
members of I(Φ(E)) which neither contain, nor are contained in, any of p1 , . . . , pt .
Let q1 , . . . , qu be the maximal members of the set of prime ideals in I(Φ(E)) that are
properly contained in one of p1 , . . . , pt , and let U := {q1 , . . . , qu }. (Observe that T
and/or U could S
be empty; for example, both are empty if a = 0.)
Set S := R \ q∈T ∪U q. Our aim is to show that a is the S-test ideal τ S (R) of R.
It follows from Corollary 2.8 that τ S (R) = bS,Φ(E), the intersection of the minimal
members of the set of prime ideals in I(Φ(E)) that meet S.
Let p ∈ I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R). Then, since I(Φ(E)) and therefore T and U are finite,
p ∩ S = ∅ if and only if p is contained in some q ∈ T ∪ U.
Let i ∈ {1, . . . , t}. Then pi meets S, or else pi ⊆ qj for some j ∈ {1, . . . , u}, and as
qj is properly contained in one of p1 , . . . , pt , this would lead to a contradiction to the
minimality of the primary decomposition a = p1 ∩ · · · ∩ pt . Furthermore, pi must be a
minimal member of the set J := {p ∈ I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R) : p ∩ S 6= ∅} , for otherwise
there would exist p ∈ J with p ⊂ pi , so that p would be contained in one of q1 , . . . , qu
and therefore disjoint from S. This shows that p1 , . . . , pt are all associated primes
of bS,Φ(E) . To complete the proof, it is enough for us to show that there is no other
associated prime of this ideal.
So suppose that p ∈ ass bS,Φ(E) \ {p1 , . . . , pt } and seek a contradiction. Then p must
contain, or be contained in, pi for some i ∈ {1, . . . , t} (or else it would be in T and
12
RODNEY Y. SHARP
disjoint from S); if p ⊂ pi , then p would be contained in qj for some j ∈ {1, . . . , t}
and so would be disjoint from S; if p ⊃ pi , then p could not be a primary component
of the radical ideal bS,Φ(E) . Thus each possibility leads to a contradiction. Therefore
ass bS,Φ(E) = {p1 , . . . , pt } and bS,Φ(E) = a.
3. The complete case
In this section we shall concentrate on the case where (R, m) is local, F -pure and
complete.
3.1. Theorem. Suppose (R, m) is local, F -pure and complete. Set E := ER (R/m).
Let c ∈ I(Φ(E)) with c 6= R. In the light of Theorem 2.12, letSp1 , . . . , pw be prime
ideals of R for which the multiplicatively closed subset S = R \ w
i=1 pi of R satisfies
c = τ S (R). Set J := ∆S (Φ(E)), a graded left R[x, f ]-module.
∗,S
∗,S
(i) We have J = 0∗,S
E ⊕ 0Rx⊗R E ⊕ · · · ⊕ 0Rxn ⊗R E ⊕ · · · .
(ii) When we regard J as a graded left (R/c)[x, f ]-module in the natural way, it
is x-torsion-free and has IR/c (J) = {g/c : g ∈ I(Φ(E)) : g ⊇ c} .
(iii) The 0th component J0 of J is (0 :E c); as R/c-module, this is isomorphic to
ER/c ((R/c)/(m/c)).
(iv) The ring R/c is F -pure.
(v) We have I(ΦR/c (J0 )) ⊆ IR/c (J), so that
d : d is an ideal of R with d ⊇ c and d/c ∈ I(ΦR/c (J0 )) ⊆ I(ΦR (E)).
Proof. Set R := R/c.
(i) It follows from Example 1.3(ii) that
∗,S
∗,S
∆S (Φ(E)) = 0∗,S
E ⊕ 0Rx⊗R E ⊕ · · · ⊕ 0Rxn ⊗R E ⊕ · · · .
(ii) Since gr-annR[x,f ] ∆S (Φ(E)) = cR[x, f ], we see that c annihilates ∆S (Φ(E)),
and so the latter inherits a structure as an x-torsion-free left R[x, f ]-module. As the
R[x, f ]-submodules of J are exactly the R[x, f ]-submodules of Φ(E) contained in J,
the claim about IR (J) is clear.
(iii) Note that c = bS,Φ(E) = τ S (R), and that, by Proposition 2.10(v), this is the
∗,S
R-annihilator of 0∗,S
E . Since R is complete, we can conclude that 0E = (0 :E c), by
Matlis duality (see, for example, [11, p. 154]).
(iv),(v) Let N be an R-module. Use the Embedding Theorem 2.5 over the ring R
(with J playing the rôle of H) to deduce that ΦR (N) is x-torsion-free and I(ΦR (N)) ⊆
IR (J). These are true for each R-module N, and, in particular, for J0 . It follows that
R is F -pure.
The final claim follows from the description of IR (J) given in part (ii).
3.2. Corollary. Suppose that (R, m) is local, F -pure and complete. Denote ER (R/m)
by E. Let c ∈ I(Φ(E)) with c 6= R. Denote R/c by R, and note that R is F pure, by Theorem 3.1(iv). Let T be a multiplicatively closed subset of R which is the
complement in R of the union of finitely many prime ideals.
(i) If h denotes the unique ideal of R that contains c and is such that h/c =
τ fg,T (R), the finitistic T -test ideal of R, then h ∈ I(Φ(E)).
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
13
(ii) In particular, if h′ denotes the unique ideal of R that contains c and is such
that h′ /c = τ (R), the test ideal of R, then h′ ∈ I(Φ(E)).
(iii) If g denotes the unique ideal of R that contains c and is such that g/c =
τ T (R), the T -test ideal of R, then g ∈ I(Φ(E)).
(iv) In particular, if g′ denotes the unique ideal of R that contains c and is such
that g′ /c = τe(R), the big test ideal of R, then g′ ∈ I(Φ(E)).
Proof. Use the notation of Theorem 3.1. Note that, as R-module, J0 is the injective
envelope of the simple R-module.
(i) By Proposition 2.10(iii), we have τ fg,T (R) ∈ I(ΦR (J0 )). The result therefore
follows from Theorem 3.1(v).
◦
(ii) This is a special case of part (i): take T = R .
(iii) By Proposition 2.10(v), we have τ T (R) ∈ I(ΦR (J0 )). The result therefore
follows from Theorem 3.1(v).
◦
(iv) This is a special case of part (iii): take T = R .
The remainder of the paper is devoted to the provision of some examples of the
above ideas.
3.3. Example. Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p, and assume
that p ≥ 5 and that p ≡ 1 (mod 3). Let R′ = K[[X, Y, Z]], where X, Y, Z are
independent indeterminates, and a = (X 3 + Y 3 + Z 3 ) ∈ Spec(R′ ). By Huneke [3,
Examples 4.7 and 4.8], R := R′ /a is F -pure, and the test ideal τ (R) = m. Because
R is Gorenstein and excellent, the test ideal τ (R) is equal to the big test ideal τe(R),
by 1.9(ii)(a). This means that m must be the smallest ideal in I(Φ(E)) of positive
height, so that I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R) = {0, m} .
3.4. Reminder. Suppose that (R, m) is local and F -pure, and set E = ER (R/m).
In the case where R is an (F -pure) homomorphic image of an F -finite regular local
ring, Janet Cowden Vassilev showed in [13, §3] that there exists a strictly ascending
chain 0 = τ0 ⊂ τ1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ τt ⊂ τt+1 = R of radical ideals of R such that, for each
i = 0, . . . , t, the reduced local ring R/τi is F -pure and its test ideal is exactly τi+1 /τi .
If R is complete, all of τ0 , τ1 , . . . , τt and all their associated primes belong to I(Φ(E))
(by Corollary 3.2(ii) and [7, Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.7]).
3.5. Lemma. Assume that (R, m) is local, F -pure and complete. Set E = ER (R/m).
(i) There is a strictly ascending chain 0 = τ0 ⊂ τ1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ τt ⊂ τt+1 = R of
radical ideals of R such that, for each i = 0, . . . , t, the reduced local ring R/τi
is F -pure and its test ideal is τi+1 /τi . We call this the test ideal chain of R.
All of τ0 = 0, τ1 , · · · , τt , and all their associated primes, belong to I(Φ(E)).
(ii) There is a strictly ascending chain 0 = τe0 ⊂ τe1 ⊂ · · · ⊂ τew ⊂ τew+1 = R of
radical ideals in I(Φ(E)) such that, for each i = 0, . . . , w, the reduced local
ring R/e
τi is F -pure and its big test ideal is τei+1 /e
τi . We call this the big test
ideal chain of R. All of τe0 = 0, τe1 , · · · , τew , and all their associated primes,
belong to I(Φ(E)).
Note. We have not assumed that R is F -finite in part (i). If the conjecture mentioned
in 1.9(ii) turns out to be true, then the big test ideal chain and the test ideal chain
of R would coincide.
14
RODNEY Y. SHARP
Proof. (i) We know from Theorem 0.1 that E can be given a structure as an x-torsionfree left R[x, f ]-module (that extends its R-module structure). It therefore follows
from work of the present author in [8, Corollary 3.8] that, in this complete case, the
test ideal chain of R exists. By Corollary 3.2(ii), all the terms in the test ideal chain
of R belong to I(Φ(E)), and all the associated prime ideals of these ideals also belong
to I(Φ(E)), by [7, Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.7].
(ii) Let c ∈ I(Φ(E)) with c 6= R. By Theorem 3.1(iv), the ring R/c is F -pure.
By Corollary 3.2(iv), if g′ denotes the unique ideal of R that contains c and is such
that g′ /c = τe(R/c), then g′ ∈ I(Φ(E)). One can therefore construct τe1 (R), τe2 (R), . . .
successively until some τet+1 (R) = R, when the process stops. Use Corollary 3.2(iv)
and [7, Theorem 3.6 and Corollary 3.7] again to complete the proof.
We can now use some of Vassilev’s computations in [13, §3] to give some examples.
3.6. Examples. Let K be an algebraically closed field of characteristic p. In these
examples, X, Y, Z, W denote independent indeterminates over K, and x, y, z, w denote
the natural images of X, Y, Z, W (respectively) in R′ /a = R for appropriate choices
of R′ and a proper ideal a of R′ .
(i) As in Vassilev [13, Example 3.12(1)], take
R′ = K[[X, Y, Z]],
a = (XY, XZ, Y Z) and R = R′ /a.
For this R, the test ideal chain is 0 ⊂ m ⊂ R. Since R is an isolated
singularity, we have τ (R) = τe(R), by 1.9(ii)(d). Therefore m is the smallest
ideal of positive height in I(Φ(E)). Thus in this case,
I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R) = {(x, y), (x, z), (y, z), m} .
(ii) As in Vassilev [13, Example 3.12(2)], take
R′ = K[[X, Y, Z, W ]],
a = (XY Z, XY W, XZW, Y ZW ) and R = R′ /a.
For this R, the test ideal chain is 0 ⊂ (xy, xz, xw, yz, yw, zw) ⊂ m ⊂ R. It
therefore follows from Lemma 3.5(i) that
{ (x, y), (x, z), (x, w), (y, z),(y, w), (z, w), (x, y, z), (x, y, w), (x, z, w),
(y, z, w), m} ⊆ I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R).
(iii) As in Vassilev [13, Example 3.12(3)], take R′ = K[[X, Y, Z]], a = (XY, Y Z),
and R = R′ /a. For this R, the test ideal chain is 0 ⊂ m ⊂ R. Because R is an
isolated singularity, τ (R) = τe(R), by 1.9(ii)(d). This means that m must be
the smallest ideal in I(Φ(E)) of positive height, so that I(Φ(E)) ∩Spec(R) =
{(x, z), (y), m} .
(iv) As in Vassilev [13, Example 3.12(4)], take
R′ = K[[X, Y, Z, W ]],
a = (XY, ZW ) and R = R′ /a.
For this R, the test ideal chain is 0 ⊂ (xy, xz, xw, yz, yw, zw) ⊂ m ⊂ R, so
that
{(x, z), (x, w), (y, z), (y, w), (x, y, z), (x, y, w), (x, z, w), (y, z, w), m}
⊆ I(Φ(E)) ∩ Spec(R)
by Lemma 3.5(i).
S-TIGHT CLOSURE OVER AN F -PURE LOCAL RING
15
References
[1] R. Fedder, ‘F -purity and rational singularity’, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc. 278 (1983)
461–480.
[2] M. Hochster and C. Huneke, ‘Tight closure, invariant theory and the Briançon-Skoda Theorem’, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3 (1990) 31–116.
[3] C. Huneke, ‘Tight closure, parameter ideals and geometry’, Six lectures on commutative algebra, Eds. J. Elias, J. M. Giral, R. M. Miró-Roig and S. Zarzuela, Progress in Mathematics 166
(Birkhäuser, Basel, 1998), pp. 187–239.
[4] I. Kaplansky, Commutative rings (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1970).
[5] G. Lyubeznik and K. E. Smith, ‘Strong and weak F -regularity are equivalent for graded
rings’, American J. Math. 121 (1999) 1279–1290.
[6] G. Lyubeznik and K. E. Smith, ‘On the commutation of the test ideal with localization and
completion’, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001) 3149–3180.
[7] R. Y. Sharp, ‘Graded annihilators of modules over the Frobenius skew polynomial ring, and
tight closure’, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007) 4237–4258.
[8] R. Y. Sharp, ‘Graded annihilators and tight closure test ideals’, J. Algebra 322 (2009) 3410–
3426.
[9] R. Y. Sharp, ‘An excellent F -pure ring of prime characteristic has a big tight closure test
element’, Transactions Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010) 5455–5481.
[10] R. Y. Sharp, ‘Big tight closure test elements for some non-reduced excellent rings’, J. Algebra
349 (2012) 284-316.
[11] D. W. Sharpe and P. Vámos, Injective modules, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics and
Mathematical Physics 62 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972).
[12] K. E. Smith, ‘Tight closure of parameter ideals’, Inventiones math. 115 (1994) 41–60.
[13] J. C. Vassilev, ‘Test ideals in quotients of F -finite regular local rings’, Transactions Amer.
Math. Soc. 350 (1998) 4041–4051.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Hicks Building, Sheffield S3 7RH,
United Kingdom
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
Power Beacon-Assisted Millimeter Wave Ad Hoc
Networks
Xiaohui Zhou, Jing Guo, Salman Durrani, and Marco Di Renzo
arXiv:1703.06611v2 [cs.IT] 6 Sep 2017
Abstract
Deployment of low cost power beacons (PBs) is a promising solution for dedicated wireless power transfer
(WPT) in future wireless networks. In this paper, we present a tractable model for PB-assisted millimeter wave
(mmWave) wireless ad hoc networks, where each transmitter (TX) harvests energy from all PBs and then uses the
harvested energy to transmit information to its desired receiver. Our model accounts for realistic aspects of WPT and
mmWave transmissions, such as power circuit activation threshold, allowed maximum harvested power, maximum
transmit power, beamforming and blockage. Using stochastic geometry, we obtain the Laplace transform of the
aggregate received power at the TX to calculate the power coverage probability. We approximate and discretize the
transmit power of each TX into a finite number of discrete power levels in log scale to compute the channel and
total coverage probability. We compare our analytical predictions to simulations and observe good accuracy. The
proposed model allows insights into effect of system parameters, such as transmit power of PBs, PB density, main
lobe beam-width and power circuit activation threshold on the overall coverage probability. The results confirm
that it is feasible and safe to power TXs in a mmWave ad hoc network using PBs.
Index Terms
Wireless communications, wireless power transfer, millimeter wave transmission, power beacon, stochastic
geometry.
X. Zhou, J. Guo and S. Durrani are with the Research School of Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science, The Australian
National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia (Emails: {xiaohui.zhou, jing.guo, salman.durrani}@anu.edu.au). M. Di Renzo is with
the Laboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, CentraleSupélec, University Paris Sud, Université
Paris-Saclay, 91192 Gif-sur-Yvette, France (Email: [email protected]).
1
I. I NTRODUCTION
Wireless power transfer (WPT) can prolong the lifetime of low-power devices in the network and
is currently in the spotlight as a key enabling technology in future wireless communication networks
[1]–[3]. Compared to energy harvesting from ambient energy sources, e.g., solar, wind or ambient radio
frequency (RF) sources, which may change rapidly with time, location and weather conditions, WPT
has a significant advantage of being always available and controllable [1]. There are currently two main
approaches to WPT: (i) simultaneous information and power transfer (SWIPT) and (ii) power beacon
(PB) based approach. While SWIPT, which proposes to extract the information and power from the same
signal, has been the subject of intense research in the academic community [1], [4], [5], industry has
preferred to adopt the PB approach. In this approach, low cost PBs, which do not require backhaul links,
are deployed to provide dedicated power transfer in wireless networks. For example, the Cota Tile is a
PB designed to wirelessly charge devices like smartphones in a home environment and was showcased at
the 2017 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) [6].
There are two key challenges in the application of PBs to wider networks. The first challenge is the lack
of tractable models for analysis and design of such networks. Although simulations can be used in this
regard, exhaustive simulation of every possible scenario of interest will be extremely time-consuming and
onerous. Hence, it is important to explore tractable models for PB-assisted communications in wireless
networks. The second challenge is the use of practical models for WPT, which capture realistic aspects of
WPT. For instance, WPT receivers (RXs) can only harvest power if the incident received power is greater
than the power circuit activation threshold (typically around −20 dBm [1]). Similarly, WPT transmitters
(TXs) have to adhere to maximum transmit power constraints due to safety considerations. Hence, it is
important to adopt a realistic and practical model for WPT.
A. Related Work
Microwave (below 6 GHz) systems: Recently, the investigation of PBs has drawn attention in the literature from different aspects. For point-to-point or point-to-multipoint communication systems, the resource
allocation for PB-assisted system was considered in [7], [8], where the authors mainly aimed at finding
2
the optimum time ratio for power transfer (PT) and information transmission (IT). In [9], the authors
studied the PB-assisted network in the context of physical layer security, where an energy constrained
source is powered by a dedicated PB. For large scale networks, some papers have characterized the
performance of PB-assisted communications using stochastic geometry, which is a powerful mathematical
tool to provide tractable analysis by incorporating the randomness of users. Specifically, the feasibility
of PB deployment in a cellular network, under the outage constraint at the base station, was investigated
in [10], where cellular users are charged by PBs for uplink transmission. By considering that the secondary
TX is charged by the primary user in a cognitive network, the authors derived the spatial throughput for
the secondary network in [11]. Adaptively directional PBs were proposed for sensor network in [12] and
the authors found the optimal charging radius for different sensing tasks. In [13], three WPT schemes
were proposed to select the PB for charging in a device-to-device-aided cognitive cellular network. The
authors in [14] formulated the total outage probability in a PB-assisted ad hoc network by including the
energy harvesting sensitivity into the analysis. Note that all the aforementioned works considered the
conventional microwave frequency band, i.e., below 6 GHz.
MmWave systems: Millimeter wave (mmWave) communication, which aims to use the spectrum band
typically around 30 GHz, is emerging as a key technology for the fifth generation systems [15]. Considerable advancements have already been made in the understanding, modelling and analysis of mmWave
communication using stochastic geometry [16]–[19]. From the prior work, we can summarize two distinctive features of mmWave communication: (i) owing to the smaller wavelength, mmWave allows a large
number of antenna arrays with directional beamforming to be equipped at the TX and RX; (ii) since the
mmWave propagation is susceptible to blockage, it causes the large difference for path-loss and fading
characteristics between line of sight (LOS) and non light of sight (NLOS) environment.
MmWave communication can be beneficial for WPT since both technologies inherently operate over
short distances and the narrow beams in mmWave communication can focus the transmit power. Very
recently, some papers have used stochastic geometry to analyse mmWave SWIPT networks [20], [21].
The statistics of the aggregate received power from PBs in a mmWave ad hoc network were studied in
3
our preliminary work in [22]. To the best of our knowledge, the study of a PB-assisted mmWave network
using stochastic geometry, taking into account realistic and practical WPT and mmWave characteristics
such as building blockages, beamforming, power circuit activation threshold, maximum harvested power
and maximum transmit power, is not available in the literature.
B. Our Approach and Contributions
In this paper, we consider a PB-assisted wireless ad hoc network under mmWave transmission where
TXs adopt the harvest-then-transmit protocol, i.e., they harvest energy from the aggregate RF signal
transmitted by PBs and then use the harvested energy to transmit the information to their desired RXs. Both
the PT and IT phases are carried out using antenna beamforming under the mmWave channel environment,
which is subjected to building blockages. Using tools from stochastic geometry, we develop a tractable
analytical framework to investigate the power coverage probability, the channel coverage probability and
the total coverage probability at a reference RX taking a mmWave three-state propagation model and multislope bounded path-loss model into account. In the proposed framework, the power coverage probability
is efficiently and accurately computed by numerical inversion using the closed-form expression for the
Laplace transform of the aggregate received power1 at the typical TX. The novel contributions of this
paper are summarized as follows:
•
We adopt a realistic model of wirelessly powered TXs by taking into consideration (i) the power
circuit activation threshold, which accounts for the minimum aggregate received power required to
activate the energy harvesting circuit, (ii) the allowed maximum harvested power, which accounts for
the saturation of the energy harvesting circuit and (iii) the maximum transmit power, which accounts
for the safety regulation and the electrical rating of the antenna circuit.
•
For tractable analysis of the channel coverage probability and the total coverage probability, we
propose to discretize the transmit power of each TX into a finite number of discrete power levels
in the log scale. Using this approximation, we derive the channel coverage probability and the total
1
In this paper, we use the Laplace transform of a random variable to denote the Laplace transform of the distribution of a random variable
for brevity.
4
coverage probability at the typical RX. Comparison with simulation results shows that the model, with
only 10 discrete levels for the transmit power of TXs, has good accuracy in the range of 5%-10%.
•
Based on our proposed model, we investigate the impact of varying important system parameters
(e.g., transmit power of PB, PB density, allowed maximum harvested power, directional beamforming
parameters etc.) on the network performance. These trends are summarized in Table V.
•
We investigate the feasibility of using PBs to power up TXs while providing an acceptable performance for IT towards RXs in mmWave ad hoc network. Our results show that under practical setups,
for PB transmit power of 50 dBm and TXs with a maximum transmit power between 20 − 40 dBm,
which are practical and safe for human exposure, the total coverage probability is around 90%.
C. Notation and Paper Organization
The following notation is used in this paper. Pr(·) indicates the probability measure and E[·] denotes
the expectation operator. j is the imaginary number and Re[·] denotes the real part of a complex numR∞
R∞
ber. Γ(x) = 0 tx−1 exp(−t)dt is the complete gamma function and Γ(a, x) = x ta−1 exp(−t)dt is
R 1 tb−1 (1−t)c−b−1
Γ(c)
dt is the
the upper incomplete gamma function, respectively. 2 F1 (a, b; c; z) = Γ(b)Γ(c−b)
(1−tz)a
0
Gaussian hypergeometric function. fX (x) and FX (x) denotes the probability density function (PDF) and
the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of a random variable X. LX (s) = E[exp(−sX)] denotes the
Laplace transform of a random variable X. A list of the main mathematical symbols employed in this
paper is given in Table I.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section II describes the system model and assumptions.
Section III focuses on the PT phase of the system and derives the power coverage probability. Section IV
details the IT phase, which covers the analysis of transmit power statistics and channel coverage probability.
Section V summaries the total coverage probability. Section VI presents the results and the effect of the
system parameters on the network performance. Finally, Section VII concludes the paper.
5
TABLE I: Summary of Main Symbols Used in the Paper.
Symbol
Definition
Symbol
Definition
φp
PB PPP
Pp
PB transmit power
φt
TX PPP
Pt
TX transmit power
φn
t
nth level TX PPP
Ptn
nth level TX transmit power
λp
Density of PB PPP
kn
Portion of TXs at the nth level
λt
Density of TX PPP
N
Number of battery levels
λn
t
Density of nth level TX PPP
w
Step size of each battery level
d0
Length of desired TX-RX link
σ2
Noise power
rmin
Radius of the LOS region
η
Power conversion efficiency
rmax
Exclusion radius of the OUT region
ρ
Time switching parameter
αL
LOS link path-loss exponent
γPT
Power circuit activation threshold
αN
NLOS link path-loss exponent
P1max
Allowed maximum harvested power at active TX
gL
LOS link channel fading
P2max
Maximum transmit power of active TX
gN
NLOS link channel fading
γTR
SINR threshold
m
Nakagami-m fading parameter
PP
cov
Power coverage probability
min
Gmax
p , Gp , θp
PB beamforming parameters
PC
cov
Channel coverage probability
min
Gmax
t , Gt , θt
TX beamforming parameters
Pcov
Total coverage probability
min
Gmax
r , Gr , θr
RX beamforming parameters
II. S YSTEM M ODEL
We consider a two-dimensional mmWave wireless ad hoc network, where TXs are first wirelessly
charged by PBs and then they transmit information to RXs. The locations of PBs are modeled as a
homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP) φp in R2 with constant node density λp . TXs are assumed to
be randomly independently deployed and their locations are modeled as a homogeneous PPP φt with node
density λt . For each TX, it has a desired RX located at a distance d0 in a random direction. Throughout
the paper, we use Xi to denote both the random location as well as the ith TX itself, Yi to denote both
the location and the corresponding ith RX and Zi to denote both the location and the ith PB, respectively.
Note that we assume the indoor-to-outdoor penetration loss is high. Therefore, all the PBs, TXs and RXs
can be regarded as outdoor devices.
6
A. Power Transfer and Information Transmission Model
We assume that each PB has access to a dedicated power supply (e.g., a battery or power grid) and
transmits with a constant power Pp . Time is divided into slots and let T denote one time slot. Each TX
adopts the harvest-then-transmit protocol to perform PT and IT. Specifically, each time slot T is divided
into two parts with ratio ρ ∈ (0, 1): in the first ρT seconds TX harvests energy from the RF signal
transmitted by PBs and stores the energy in an ideal (infinite capacity) battery2 . In the remaining (1 − ρ)T
seconds, TXs use all the harvested energy to transmit information to their desired RXs. Hence, there is
no interference between the PT and IT stages. We make the following assumptions for realistic modelling
of PT:
•
Different from previous works [10], [21], [24], where energy harvesting activation threshold is not
considered and the devices can harvest power from any amount of incident power, we assume that
the TX can scavenge energy if and only if the instantaneous aggregate received power from all PBs
is greater than a power circuit activation threshold γPT . If this condition is met, then the TX is called
an active TX. Otherwise, the TX will be inactive and will not scavenge any energy from the PBs.
•
Once the energy harvesting circuit is activated, the harvested power at the active TX is assumed to
be linearly proportional to the aggregate received power with power conversion efficiency η. Due to
the saturation of the energy harvesting circuit, the harvested power at the active TX cannot exceed
a maximum level denoted as P1max [25]. In addition, the active TX cannot transmit information with
a power greater than P2max because of the safety regulation and the electrical rating of the antenna
circuit [26].
B. MmWave Blockage Model
Under outdoor mmWave transmissions, each link between the PB and the TX (i.e., PB-TX link) or
between the TX and the RX (i.e., TX-RX link) is susceptible to building blockages due to their high
diffraction and penetration characteristics [16]. In this work, we adopt the state-of-the-art three-state
blockage model as in [17], [27], where each PB-TX or TX-RX link can be in one of the following three
2
In this work, we do not consider the impact of battery imperfections [23].
7
states: (i) the link is in LOS state if no blockage exists, (ii) the link is in NLOS state if blockage exists
and (iii) the link is in outage (OUT) state if the link is too weak to be established.
Given that the PB-TX or TX-RX link has a length of r, the probabilities pLOS (·), pNLOS (·) and pOUT (·)
of it being in LOS, NLOS and OUT states, respectively, are
pOUT (r) = u(r − rmax );
pNLOS (r) = u(r − rmin ) − u(r − rmax );
(1)
pLOS (r) = 1 − u(r − rmin ),
where u(·) denotes the unit step function, rmin is the radius of the LOS region and rmax is the exclusion
radius of the OUT region3 , as illustrated in Fig. 1. The values of rmin and rmax depend on the propagation
scenario and the mmWave carrier frequency [17]. Moreover, the communication link between TX and its
desired RX is assumed to be always in LOS state.
C. MmWave Channel Model
It has been shown by the measurements that mmWave links experience different channel conditions
under LOS, NLOS and OUT states [30]. Thus, we consider the following path-loss plus block fading
channel model.
For the path-loss, we adopt and modify a multi-slope path-loss model [31] and define the path-loss of
PB-TX or TX-RX link with a propagation distance
1,
r−αL ,
l(r) =
βr−αN ,
∞,
of r as follows
06r<1
1 6 r < rmin
,
(2)
rmin 6 r < rmax
rmax 6 r
where the first condition is added to avoid the singularity as r → 0, αL denotes the path-loss exponent
for the link in LOS state, αN denotes the path-loss exponent for the link in NLOS state (2 6 αL 6 αN ),
3
Note that the two-state blockage model in [28], [29], which does not consider the OUT region, can be considered as a special case of
the three-state blockage model with rmax = ∞.
8
the path-loss of the link in OUT state is assumed to be infinite [17] and the continuity in the multi-slope
αN −αL
path-loss model is maintained by introducing the constant β , rmin
[31].
As for the fading, the link under LOS state is assumed to experience Nakagami-m fading, while the
link under NLOS state is assumed to experience Rayleigh fading4 . Furthermore, both the LOS and the
NLOS links experience additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) with variance σ 2 . However, under the PT
phase, the AWGN power is too small to be harvested by TXs. Hence, we ignore it in the PT phase.
D. Beamforming Model
To compensate the large path-loss in mmWave band, directional beamforming is necessary for devices [33]. In this work, we consider that mmWave antenna arrays perform directional beamforming at
all PBs, TXs and RXs. Similar to [16], [17], the actual antenna array pattern can be approximated by a
sectorized gain pattern which is given by
Ga (θ) =
Gmax
|θ| ≤
a ,
Gmin
a ,
θa
2
,
(3)
otherwise
is the main lobe antenna gain,
where subscript a = p for PB, a = t for TX and a = r for RX, Gmax
a
is the side lobe antenna gain, θ ∈ [−π, π) is the angle off the boresight direction and θa is the main
Gmin
a
lobe beam-width. Note that, as shown in Section VI-C, this model can be easily related to specific array
geometries, such as an N element uniform planar or linear or circular array [18].
The main beam at the PBs are assumed to be randomly and independently oriented with respect to
each other and uniformly distributed in [−π, π). Given a sufficient density of the PBs, this simple strategy
ensures that the aggregate received power from PBs at different locations in the network is roughly on
the same order and avoids the need for channel estimation and accurate beam alignment. In addition, it
has been shown in [33] that the random directional beamforming can perform reasonably well given that
more than one users need to be served.
4
We do not consider shadowing but it can be included using the composite fading model in [32].
9
PB-TX gain Gij
Fig. 1: Illustration of mmWave blockage model.
TX-RX gain Dij
k
Gain Gk
Probability pk
Gain Dk
Probability qk
1
max
Gmax
p Gt
θp θt
4π 2
max
Gmax
t Gr
θt θr
4π 2
2
min
Gmax
p Gt
θp (2π−θt )
4π 2
min
Gmax
t Gr
θt (2π−θr )
4π 2
3
max
Gmin
p Gt
(2π−θp )θt
4π 2
max
Gmin
t Gr
(2π−θt )θr
4π 2
4
min
Gmin
p Gt
(2π−θp )(2π−θt )
4π 2
min
Gmin
t Gr
(2π−θt )(2π−θr )
4π 2
TABLE II: Probability Mass Function of Gij and Dij .
Let Gij be the effective antenna gain on the link from the ith PB to the jth TX. Under sectorization,
Gij is a discrete random variable with probability pk = Pr(Gij = Gk ) and k ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4}, where its
distribution is summarized in Table II.
With regards to TX and RX, we assume that each TX points its main lobe towards its desired RX
max
and the
directly. Therefore, the effective antenna gain of the desired TX-RX link is D0 = Gmax
t Gr
orientation of the beam of the interfering TX is uniformly distributed in [−π, π). Let Dij (i 6= j) be the
effective antenna gain on the link from the ith TX to the jth RX. Similar to Gij , Dij is a discrete random
variable with probability qk = Pr(Dij = Dk ), where its distribution is given in Table II.
E. Metrics
In this paper, we are interested in the PB-assisted mmWave wireless ad hoc network in terms of the
total coverage probability for RXs (i.e., the probability that a RX can successfully receive the information
from its TX after the TX successfully harvests energy from PBs). Based on the system model described
above, the success of this event has to satisfy two requirements, which are:
•
The corresponding TX is in power coverage. Due to the random network topology and the fading
channels, the aggregate received power from all PBs is a random variable. If the aggregate received
power at a TX is greater than the power circuit activation threshold, the energy harvesting circuit is
active and this TX can successfully harvest energy from PBs. As a result, the TX is under power
coverage and IT then takes place.
10
•
The RX is in channel coverage. The instantaneous transmit power for each active TX depends on
its random received power. RX can receive the information from its desired TX (i.e., in channel
coverage) if the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the RX is above a certain threshold.
By leveraging the Laplace transform of the aggregate received power at a typical TX and the interference
at a typical RX, we compute the power coverage probability and channel coverage probability in the
following sections. In the subsequent analysis, we condition on having a reference RX Y0 at the origin
(0, 0) and its associated TX X0 located at a distance d0 away at (d0 , 0). According to Slivnyak’s theorem,
the conditional distribution is the same as the original one for the rest of the network [34].
III. P OWER T RANSFER
In this section, we focus on the PT phase of the system. We analyze the aggregate received power at
a reference TX from all PBs and find the power coverage probability at the corresponding RX.
Since the power harvested from the noise is negligible, the instantaneous aggregate received power at
the typical TX X0 from all the PBs can be expressed as
PPT = Pp
X
Gi0 gi0 l(ri ),
(4)
Zi ∈φp
where Pp is the PB transmit power, Gi0 is the effective antenna gain between Zi and X0 , gi0 is the fading
power gain between the ith PB Zi and the typical TX X0 , which follows the gamma distribution (under
Nakagami-m fading assumption) if the PB-TX link is in LOS state and exponential distribution (under
Rayleigh fading distribution) if the PB-TX link is in NLOS state. l(ri ) is the path-loss function given
in (2) and ri = |Zi − X0 | is the Euclidean length of the PB-TX link between Zi and X0 . Using (4), the
power coverage probability is defined as follows.
Definition 1: The power coverage probability is the probability that the aggregate received power at
the typical TX is higher than the power circuit activation threshold γPT . It can be expressed as
PPcov (γPT ) = Pr(PPT > γPT ).
(5)
Remark 1: Analytically characterizing the power coverage probability in (5) is a challenging open
problem in the literature. Generally, it is not possible to obtain a closed-form power coverage probability
11
because of the randomness in the antenna gain, mmWave channels and locations of PBs. The closed-form
expression only exists under the unbounded path-loss model with α = 4 and Rayleigh fading for all
links, which is shown to be Lévy distribution [34]. To overcome this problem, some works [20], [28],
[35] employed the Gamma scaling method. This approach involves introducing a dummy Gamma random
variable with parameter N 0 to reformulate the original problem. However, the approach can sometimes
lead to large errors with finite N 0 value. Other works adopted the Gil-Pelaez inversion theorem [36] . This
approach involves one fold integration and is only suitable for the random variable with a simple Laplace
transform. If the Laplace transform is even moderately complicated, this method is not very efficient even
if the Laplace transform is in closed-form.
In this work, we adopt a numerical inversion method, which is easy to compute, if the Laplace transform
of a random variable is in closed-form, and provides controllable error estimation. Following [37], [38],
the CDF of the aggregate received power PPT is given as
1
FPPT (x) =
2πj
=
1
2πj
Z
a+j∞
a−j∞
Z a+j∞
a−j∞
LFPPT (s) exp(sx)ds
(6a)
LPPT (s)
exp(sx)ds.
s
(6b)
where (6a) is obtained according to the Bromwich integral [39] and (6b) follows from probability theory
that LPPT (s) = sLFPPT (s). Using the trapezoidal rule and the Euler summation, the above integral can be
transformed into a finite sum. Therefore, we can express the power coverage probability as
B C+b
2−B exp( A2 ) X B X (−1)c
LPPT (s)
P
Pcov (γPT ) =1 −
Re
,
γPT
b
D
s
c
c=0
b=0
where Re[·] is the real part operator, s =
A+j2πc
,
2γPT
(7)
LPPT (s) is the Laplace transform of PPT , Dc = 2 (if
c = 0) and Dc = 1 (if c = 1, 2, ..., C + b). A, B and C are positive parameters used to control the
estimation accuracy.
From (7), the key parameter in order to obtain the power coverage probability is LPPT (s). By the
definition of Laplace transform of a random variable, we express LPPT (s) in closed-form in the following
theorem.
Theorem 1: Following the system model in Section II, the Laplace transform of the aggregate received
12
power at the typical TX from all the PBs in a mmWave ad hoc network is
4
Y
−αL
2
LPPT (s) = exp πλp rmin
pk mm (m+srmin
Pp Gk )−m−1 + πλp pk (sPp Gk )δL (Ξ1 (1) − Ξ1 (rmin ))
k=1
+ πλp pk sPp Gk β (Ξ2 (rmin ) − Ξ2 (rmax )) +
πλp
pk (sPp Gk β)δN (Ξ3 (rmin ) − Ξ3 (rmax )) ,
2 + αN
(8)
where
mm (r−αL sPp Gk )−δL −m αL Γ(1 + m)
mrαL
Ξ1 (r) =
,
(9)
2 F1 1 + m,m + δL ;1 + m + δL ;−
(2 + mαL )Γ(m)
sPp Gk
r2
Ξ2 (r) = α
,
(10)
r N + sPp Gk β
(r−αN sPp Gk β)−δN −1
rαN β −1
αN
Ξ3 (r) =
,
sPp Gk β(2 + αN ) −2(r +sPp Gk β)2 F1 1, δN +1; 2+δN ; −
rαN + sPp Gk β
sPp Gk
(11)
and Γ(·) is the complete gamma function,
function, δL ,
2
αL
and δN ,
2 F1 (·, ·; ·; ·)
is the Gaussian (or ordinary) hypergeometric
2
.
αN
Proof: See Appendix A.
By substituting (8) into (7), we can compute the power coverage probability. As shown in Theorem 1,
the Laplace transform of PPT is in closed-form; hence, PPcov (γPT ) is just a summation over a finite number
of terms. Following the selection guideline of parameters A, B and C in [38], we can achieve a stable
numerical result by carefully choosing them.
Before ending this section, we validate the analysis for the power coverage probability. Fig. 2 plots the
power coverage probability versus power circuit activation threshold. The simulation results are generated
by averaging over 108 Monte Carlo simulation runs. We set A = 24, B = 20 and C = 30 in order to
achieve an estimation error of 10−10 . The other system parameters follow Table IV. From the figure, we
can see that the analytical results match perfectly with the simulation results, which demonstrates the
accuracy of the proposed approach. Fig. 2 also shows that the power coverage probability increases with
the density of PBs, because the aggregate received power at TX increases as the PB density increases.
IV. I NFORMATION T RANSMISSION
In this section we focus on the IT phase between the TX and RX. We assume that the TX uses all the
harvested energy in the IT phase. As indicated in Section II-A, the transmit power of an active TX is a
13
Power coverage probability
1
=100/km2
p
0.8
=50/km2
p
=10/km2
p
0.6
Simulation
0.4
0.2
0
-20
-10
0
10
Power circuit activation threshold
20
PT
30
(dBm)
Fig. 2: Power coverage probability versus power circuit activation threshold γPT for different PB densities. Other system parameters follow
Table IV.
random variable which depends on its harvested power. Hence, we first evaluate the transmit power for an
active TX. Then, we calculate the channel coverage probability at the reference RX. Note that the derived
channel coverage probability is in fact a conditional probability, which is conditioned on the reference
TX-RX link being active.
A. Transmit Power and Locations of Active TX
Using the PT assumptions in Section II-A, the instantaneous transmit power for each active TX is
ρ
η 1−ρ
PPT ,
min(η −1 P1max , 1−ρ
P max ) > PPT > γPT
ηρ 2
Pt =
,
(12)
ρ
1−ρ
min( P max , P max ), P > min(η −1 P max ,
P max )
1−ρ
1
2
PT
1
ηρ
2
where 0 6 η 6 1 is the power conversion efficiency. Note that the first condition in (12) comes from the
fact that the received power at an active TX must be greater than γPT . For the second condition in (12),
P1max is the maximum harvested power at an active TX when the energy harvesting circuit is saturated
and P2max is the maximum transmit power for an active TX. Thus, the second condition caps the transmit
power by the allowed maximum harvested power constraint or the maximum transmit power constraint.
The following remarks discuss the modelling challenges and proposed solution for characterizing Pt .
Remark 2: To the best of our knowledge, the closed-form expression for the PDF of Pt is very difficult
to obtain. This is because Pt and PPT are correlated and the closed-form CDF of PPT is not available
14
according to Section III. In the literature, some papers [21], [40] have proposed to use the average harvested
power as the transmit power for each TX. However, this does not always lead to accurate results. Hence,
inspired from the approach in [41], we propose to discretize Pt in (12) into a finite number of levels.
We show that this approximation allows tractable computation of the channel coverage probability. The
accuracy of this approximation depends on the number of levels. Our results in Section VI-A show that
if we discretize the power level in the log scale, a reasonable level of accuracy is reached with as little
as 10 levels.
Remark 3: From (12), we can see that Pt depends on PPT . Hence, the motivation for discretizing Pt
in the log scale comes from looking into two important measures of PPT , the skewness and the kurtosis.
The skewness and the kurtosis describe the shape of the probability distribution of PPT . As presented in
[22], the distribution of the aggregate received power is skewed to the right with a heavy tail, because
both the skewness and the kurtosis of PPT are much greater than 0 for most cases. Therefore, most of the
TXs will be at the lowest power level if we discretize Pt in linear scale. Hence, we discretize the power
level in the log scale. This improves the accuracy of the approximation.
Let N + 1 and w denote the total number of levels and the step size of each level, respectively.
P2max )−γPT
min(η −1 P1max , 1−ρ
ηρ
dBm. We further define kn as the portion of TXs
They are related by w =
N
whose Pt is at the nth level, i.e., kn = Pr ((nw + γPT ) dBm 6 PPT < ((n + 1) w + γPT ) dBm) for n =
{0, 1, 2, ..., N − 1} and kN = Pr(PPT > min(η −1 P1max , 1−ρ
P max )). Combining with the power coverage
ηρ 2
probability derived in Section III, we can express kn as
PPcov ((nw + γPT )dBm) − PPcov (((n + 1) w + γPT ) dBm) ,
kn =
PP (min(η −1 P max , 1−ρ P max )),
cov
1
ηρ
2
n = {0, 1, 2, ..., N − 1}
.
(13)
n=N
The above expression allows us to determine the portion of TXs whose Pt is at the nth level. The
transmit power for the active TX at the nth level is
nw+γPT −30
ρ
n
10
Pt = η
10
W.
1−ρ
(14)
The next step is to decide how to model the locations of the TXs whose Pt is at the nth level. This is
discussed in the remark below.
15
Remark 4: In general, the location and the transmit power of an active TX are correlated, i.e., a TX has
higher chance to be activated and transmits with a larger power, if its location is closer to a PB. However,
it is not easy to identify and fit a spatial point process with local clustering to model the location of active
TXs [14], [42]. In this paper, for analytical tractability, we assume that the location and the transmit power
of an active TX are independent, i.e., a TX in φt can have a transmit power of Ptn with probability kn
independently of other TXs.
Therefore, using the thinning theorem, we interpret the active TX at the nth level as an independent
homogeneous PPP with node density λnt = kn λt , denoted as φnt . The accuracy of this approximation will
be validated in Section VI-A.
B. Channel Coverage Probability
Given that the desired TX is active, the instantaneous SINR at the reference RX, Y0 , is given as
SIN R = P
PX0 D0 h0 l(d0 )
,
2
Xi ∈φactive PXi Di0 hi0 l(Xi ) + σ
(15)
where h0 and hi0 denote the fading power gains on the reference link and the ith interference link
respectively, D0 and Di0 denote the beamforming antenna gain at the RX from its reference TX and the
ith interfering TX respectively and σ 2 is the AWGN power. PX0 and PXi are the transmit power for the
reference TX and the active TX Xi , respectively. Using (15), the power coverage probability is defined
as follows.
Definition 2: The channel coverage probability is the probability that the SINR at the reference RX is
above a threshold γTR and can be expressed as
PC
cov (γTR ) = Pr(SIN R > γTR ).
(16)
Remark 5: It is possible to employ the numerical inversion method in Section III to find the channel
coverage probability. In doing so, the Laplace transform of the term
IX +σ 2
PX0 D0 h0 l(d0 )
is required. This Laplace
tranform cannot be expressed in closed-form because of the random variables PX0 and h0 in the denominator. Although it is still computable, it leads to greater computation complexity. Consequently, we
employ the reference link power gain (RLPG) based method in [38] to efficiently find the channel coverage
16
probability. The basic principle of this approach is to first find the conditional outage probability in terms
of the CDF of the reference links fading power gain and then remove the conditioning on the fading
power gains and locations of the interferers, respectively. In order to apply this method, the reference
TX-RX link is assumed to undergo Nakagami-m fading with integer m. The result for the conditional
channel coverage probability is presented in the following proposition.
Proposition 1: Following the system model in Section II, the conditional channel coverage probability
at the reference RX in a mmWave ad hoc network is
PC
cov (γTR ) =
where IX =
PN P
n=0
Xi ∈φn
t
N m−1
X
X (−s)l dl
kn
2 (s)
,
L
I
+σ
X
l
P (γ
l!
ds
P
)
PT
cov
n=0 l=0
Ptn Di0 hi0 l(Xi ) and s =
(17)
mγTR
.
Ptn D0 l(d0 )
Proof: See Appendix B.
(17) needs the Laplace transform of the interference plus noise. Using stochastic geometry, we can
derive it and the result is shown in the following corollary.
Corollary 1: Following the system model in Section II and the discretization assumption in Section IV-A, the Laplace transform of the aggregate interference plus noise at the reference RX in a mmWave
ad hoc network is
LIX +σ2 (s) =
N Y
4
Y
−αL n
2
exp πλnt rmin
qk mm (m+srmin
Pt Dk )−m−1 + πλnt qk (sPtn Dk )δL (Ξ01 (1) − Ξ01 (rmin ))
n=0k=1
+πλnt qk sPtn Dk β (Ξ02 (rmin ) − Ξ02 (rmax )) +
πλnt
qk (sPtn Dk β)δN (Ξ03 (rmin ) − Ξ03 (rmax )) exp(−sσ 2 ),
2 + αN
(18)
where
mm (r−αL sPtn Dk )−δL −m αL Γ(1 + m)
mrαL
=
,
(19)
2 F1 1 + m,m + δL ;1 + m + δL ;−
(2 + mαL )Γ(m)
sPtn Dk
r2
Ξ02 (r) = α
,
(20)
r N + sPtn Dk β
(r−αN sPtn Dk β)−δN −1 n
rαN β −1
0
αN
n
Ξ3 (r) =
sPt Dk β(2 + αN ) −2(r +sPt Dk β)2 F1 1, δN +1; 2+δN ; − n
.
rαN + sPtn Dk β
sPt Dk
Ξ01 (r)
(21)
Proof: Following the definition of Laplace transform, we have
LIX +σ2 (s) =EIX [exp(−s(IX + σ 2 ))] = EIX [exp(−sIX )] exp(−sσ 2 ) = LIX (s) exp(−sσ 2 ),
(22)
17
where the Laplace transform of the aggregate interference can be expressed as
N
X
X
LIX (s) =EIX [exp(−sIX )] = EDi0 ,hi0 ,φnt exp −s
Ptn Di0 hi0 l(Xi )
n=0 Xi ∈φn
t
=
N
Y
n=0
EDi0 ,hi0 ,φnt exp −s
X
Ptn Di0 hi0 l(Xi ) .
(23)
Xi ∈φn
t
Then, following the same steps as the proof of Laplace transform of aggregate received power in Appendix A, we can find the expectation in (23) and arrive at the result in (18).
The Laplace transform shown in Corollary 1 is in closed-form. Substituting (18) into (17), we can easily
compute the conditional channel coverage probability. Note that (17) requires higher order derivatives of
the Laplace transform of the interference plus noise
dl
2 (s),
L
dsl IX +σ
which can be yielded in closed-form
using chain rules and changing variables. For brevity, the details are omitted here.
V. T OTAL C OVERAGE P ROBABILITY
As discussed in Section II-E, the event that the information can be successfully delivered to RX has
two requirements, i.e., satisfying power coverage and channel coverage. Based on our definition, the total
coverage probability is
Pcov (γPT , γTR ) = Pr(TX is in power coverage & RX is in channel coverage)
= Pr(TX is in power coverage) Pr(RX is in channel coverage | TX is in power coverage)
Combining our analysis presented in Section III and IV, we have
Pcov (γPT , γTR ) =PPcov (γPT )PC
cov (γTR )
N m−1
X
X (−s)l dl
=
LI +σ2 (s)kn ,
l! dsl X
n=0 l=0
where s =
mγTR
,
Ptn D0 l(d0 )
(24)
LIX +σ2 (s) is given in Corollary 1, kn is presented in (13), which is determined by
the power coverage probability. The key metrics are summarized in Table III.
VI. R ESULTS
In this section, we first validate the proposed model and then discuss the design insights provided by
the model. Unless stated otherwise, the values of the parameters summarized in Table IV are used. The
18
TABLE III: Summary of the Analytical Model for PB-assisted mmWave Ad Hoc Networks.
Performance metrics
General form
Key factor(s)
Power coverage probability
(7)
LPPT (s) in (8)
Channel coverage probability
(17)
PP
cov (γPT ) in (7) & LIX +σ 2 (s) in (18)
Total coverage probability
(24)
PP
cov (γPT ) in (7) & LIX +σ 2 (s) in (18)
TABLE IV: Parameter Values.
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
Parameter
Value
λp
50 /km2
m
5
αL
2
ρ
0.5
λt
100 /km2
min
Gmax
p , Gp , θp
[20 dB, −10 dB, 30o ]
αN
4
η
0.5
d0
20 m
min
Gmax
t , Gt , θt
[10 dB, −10 dB, 45o ]
Pp
40 dBm
γPT
-20 dBm
rmin
100 m
min
Gmax
r , Gr , θr
[10 dB, −10 dB, 45o ]
P1max
20 dBm
γTR
30 dBm
rmax
200 m
σ2
-30 dBm
P2max
30 dBm
N
10
chosen values are consistent with the literature in mmWave and WPT [1], [16], [17]. Note that the values
of rmin and rmax correspond to 28 GHz mmWave carrier frequency [16]. We mainly focus on illustrating
the results for total coverage probability and channel coverage probability. As for the power coverage
probability, it will be explained within the text.
Table V summarizes the impact of varying the important system parameters5 , i.e., SINR threshold γTR ,
PB density λp , TX density λt , PB transmit power Pp , radius of the LOS region rmin , power circuit activation
threshold γPT , the beam-width of the main lobe of TX θt , RX’s main lobe beam-width θr , allowed
maximum harvested power at active TX P1max , time switching parameter ρ and TX maximum transmit
power P2max on the three network performance metrics. In Table V, ↑, ↓ and - denote increase, decrease
and unrelated, respectively. ↑↓ represents that the performance metric first increases then decreases with
the system parameter. Please note that the trends in Table V originate from the analysis of the numerical
results, which is presented in detail in the following subsections.
5
Note that the trends reported in Table V remain the same for a two-state blockage model.
19
TABLE V: Effect of Important System Parameters.
Parameter
Power coverage probability
Channel coverage probability
Total coverage probability
Increasing γTR
-
↓
↓
Increasing λp
↑
↓↑
↑
Increasing λt
-
↓
↓
Increasing Pp
↑
↑
↑
Increasing rmin
↑
↑
↑
Increasing γPT
↓
↑
↓
Increasing θt and θr
↑
↓
↓
Increasing P1max
-
↑↓
↑↓
Increasing ρ
-
↑
↑
Increasing P2max
-
↓
↓
A. Model Validation
In this section, we validate the proposed model for the channel coverage probability and the total
coverage probability. Fig. 3 plots the channel coverage probability and the total coverage probability for
a reference RX against SINR threshold for different densities of PBs and TXs. The analytical results are
obtained using Proposition 1 and (24) with 10 discrete levels for Pt . The simulation results are generated
by averaging over 108 Monte Carlo simulation runs and do not assume any discretization of power levels.
From the figure, we can see that our analytical results provide a good approximation to the simulation.
The small gap between them comes from two reasons: (i) discretization of the power levels, as discussed in
Remark 3, and (ii) ignorance of the correlation between the location and the transmit power of active TX,
as discussed in Remark 4. From Fig. 3, we can see that the gap between the simulation and the analytical
results is smaller, when γTR is higher. At γTR = 30 dBm, which is a typical SINR threshold, the relative
errors between the proposed model and the simulation results for both channel coverage probability and
total coverage probability are between 5% to 10%. This validates the use of 10 discrete levels for Pt ,
which provides good accuracy.
Insights: Comparing the four cases for the different PB and TX densities, Fig. 3 shows that: (i)
The channel coverage probability decreases while the total coverage probability increases as PB density
1
1
0.8
0.8
Coverage probability
Coverage probability
20
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
Channel
Total
Simulation
20
30
SINR threshold
40
TR
50
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
60
(dBm)
0.8
0.8
Coverage probability
Coverage probability
1
0.6
0.4
Channel
Total
Simulation
20
30
SINR threshold
40
TR
50
(dBm)
(c) λp = 50 /km2 , λt = 250 /km2 .
30
40
TR
50
60
(dBm)
(b) λp = 10 /km2 , λt = 100 /km2 .
1
0
10
20
SINR threshold
(a) λp = 50 /km2 , λt = 500 /km2 .
0.2
Channel
Total
Simulation
60
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
Channel
Total
Simulation
20
30
SINR threshold
40
TR
50
60
(dBm)
(d) λp = 10 /km2 , λt = 50 /km2 .
Fig. 3: Channel coverage probability and total coverage probability versus SINR threshold γTR . The PB density is 50 and 10 per km2 and
the TX density is 500, 100, 250 and 50 per km2 .
increases. As the PB density increases, the aggregate received power at TX increases as well as the number
of active TXs. Therefore, interfering power received by the RX is higher and the channel coverage
probability decreases. However, the total coverage probability increases because the power coverage
probability increases with the PB density. (ii) When the PB density is low, the TXs are very likely
to be inactive and the total coverage probability is dominated by the power coverage probability. When
the PB density is high, the TXs are very likely to be active. Hence, the interference is strong and the
channel coverage probability dominates the total coverage probability. (iii) For the same PB density, both
the total coverage probability and the channel coverage probability are higher, when the TX density is
lower. This is because more interfering TXs exist if TX density increases.
21
B. Effect of PB Transmit Power
Fig. 4(a) illustrates the effect of PB transmit power Pp on the total coverage probability and channel
coverage probability, with different radius of the LOS region rmin = 50m, 100m. The simulation results
are also plotted in the figure, which are averaged over 108 Monte Carlo simulation runs. The accuracy is
between 3% to 8%, which again validates the proposed model. Hence, in the subsequent figures in the
paper we only show the analytical results and discuss the insights.
Fig. 4(b) plots the total coverage probability against the transmit power of PB. We also plot an asymptotic
result when Pp approaches infinity. This result is obtained as follows. As Pp approaches infinity, if one
or more PBs fall into the LOS or NLOS region of a TX, this TX will be active and transmit with a
ρ
P1max , P2max ). Hence, the asymptotic power coverage probability is equivalent to
power of Pt = min( 1−ρ
the probability that at least one PB falls into the LOS or NLOS region of the TX, which is given by
2
lim PPcov = 1 −exp −πλp rmax
.
Pp →∞
(25)
The asymptotic conditional channel coverage probability and the asymptotic total coverage probability
can be found by (17) and (24) respectively with the portion of TXs at the nth level as
0,
n = {0, 1, 2, ..., N − 1}
.
lim kn =
Pp →∞
PPcov , n = N
(26)
From the figure, we can see that the analytical and asymptotic results converge as Pp gets large, which
validates the derivation of the asymptotic results. In addition, in Fig. 4(b), we have marked the safe RF
exposure region with a PB transmit power less than 51 dBm, equivalently power density smaller than 10
W/m2 at 1 m from the PB [26]. We will discuss in detail later in the feasibility study in Section VI-E.
Insights: Fig. 4(a) shows that: (i) The channel coverage probability first slightly decreases and then
increases with the increase of Pp . This can be explained as follows. At first, both the transmit power of the
desired TX and the number of interfering TX increase with Pp . The interplay of this two factors results
in the slightly decreasing trend for the channel coverage probability. As Pp further increases, the increase
in the number of interfering TX is negligible, while the transmit power of the desired TX continues to
22
1
Total coverage probability
1
Coverage probability
Channel coverage probability
0.8
Total coverage probability
0.6
rmin=50m
0.4
rmin=100m
Simulation (P ccov)
0.2
Simulation (P cov)
0
30
35
40
45
Asymptotic total coverage
probability=0.9953
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
50
PB transmit power Pp (dBm)
(a) Channel coverage and total coverage with different rmin .
Analytical
Asymptotic
0
30
Safe level of RF exposure
40
50
Unsafe level of RF exposure
60
70
80
PB transmit power Pp (dBm)
(b) Total coverage and asymptotic total coverage.
Fig. 4: Coverage probabilities versus PB transmit power Pp .
increase, which leads to the increase of the channel coverage probability. (ii) The total coverage probability
increases as PB transmit power Pp increases. When Pp is small, the desired TX might not receive enough
power to activate the IT process. So the total coverage probability is small and is limited by the power
coverage probability. When Pp is large, the channel coverage probability becomes the dominant factor
in determining the total coverage probability. Hence, eventually the channel coverage probability and
total coverage probability curves merge. (iii) The total coverage probability increase with rmin , because
more PBs falls into the LOS region and the path-loss is less severe, which improves the power coverage
probability. The benefit of increasing the radius of the LOS region is less significant for the channel
coverage probability.
C. Effect of Directional Beamforming at PB, TX and RX
Fig. 5 plots the total coverage probability and channel coverage probability against the power circuit
activation threshold of TX for different beamforming parameters at TX and RX, i.e., [20 dB, −10 dB,
30o ] and [10 dB, −10 dB, 45o ].
Insights: Fig. 5 shows that, for both sets of beamforming parameters, as the power circuit activation
threshold γPT increases, the channel coverage probability is always increasing, while the total coverage
probability stays roughly the same at first and then decreases. This can be explained as follows. When γPT
23
1
Channel coverage probability
0.9
0.8
Total coverage probability
0.7
o
TX, RX [20, -10, 30 ]
TX, RX [10, -10, 45 o]
0.6
-30
Total coverage probability
Coverage probability
1
Np =4, 9, 16
0.9
1
0.8
0.95
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.85
4
6
8
N =4
10
p
Np=9
0.5
Np=16
0.4
-25
-20
-15
Power circuit activation threshold
-10
PT
(dBm)
5
10
15
20
Number of TX and RX antenna elements Nt , N r
Fig. 5: Channel coverage probability and total coverage probability
Fig. 6: Total coverage probability versus the numbers of antenna
versus power circuit activation threshold γPT with different TX and
elements at TX and RX Nt and Nr with different numbers of
RX beamforming parameters.
antenna elements at PB.
increases, the power coverage probability decreases. The reduction in the number of active TXs improves
the channel coverage probability. With regards to the total coverage probability, its trend is determined by
the interplay of channel coverage probability and power coverage probability. At first, the drop in power
coverage is relatively small as shown in Fig. 2; so the total coverage probability is almost unchanged.
After a certain point, the power coverage probability drops a lot, which mainly governs the total coverage
probability. Hence, the total coverage probability decreases later on.
Comparing the curves for the different beamforming parameters, we can see that TX and RX with [20
dB, −10 dB, 30o ] gives a higher total coverage probability in the low power circuit activation threshold
region. This is because a narrower main lobe beam-width gives a larger main lobe gain and makes less
interfering TXs fall into its main lobe which results in higher channel coverage probability. However, the
total coverage probability is limited by the power coverage probability when γPT is large.
Impact of number of antenna elements: The beamforming model adopted in this paper can be related to
any specific array geometry by substituting the appropriate values for the three beamforming parameters.
For instance, a uniform planar square array with half-wavelength antenna element spacing can be used
min
at the PBs, TXs and RXs. The values for the main lobe antenna gain Gmax
a , side lobe antenna gain Ga
and main lobe beamwidth θa depend on the number of the antenna elements Na and can be calculated
24
by using the equations below [18]:
√
Gmax
= Na , Gmin
a
a
√
√
√
Na − 2π3 Na sin( 2√N3 a )
3
√
√
, θa = √ ,
= √
3
3
Na
Na − 2π sin( 2√Na )
(27)
where subscript a = p for PB, a = t for TX and a = r for RX.
Fig. 6 plots the total coverage probability versus the numbers of antenna elements at the TX and
RX Nt and Nr with different PB antenna element number Np . The figure shows that the total coverage
probability increases with the numbers of antenna elements at the TX and RX, which agrees with our
previous findings. However, under our considered system parameters, the total coverage probability stays
roughly the same after having more than about 15 TX and RX antenna elements, as the side lobe antenna
gain and the main lobe beamwidth stay almost constant with further increase in the number of antenna
elements. In addition, the number of antenna elements at the PB does not significantly impact the total
coverage probability.
D. Effect of Allowed Maximum Harvested Power at TX
Fig. 7 plots the total coverage probability and channel coverage probability against the allowed maximum
harvested power of TX P1max for different time switching ratios 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8. Note that both the time
switching ratio and the allowed maximum harvested power do not affect the power coverage probability.
Insights: Fig. 7 shows that the channel coverage probability and the total coverage probability both first
increase with P1max , then decrease. The rise of the channel coverage probability is because the possible
transmit power of the desired TX increases with its allowed maximum harvested power. However, as
P1max further increases, the accumulated harvested energy during the PT phase is higher and the transmit
power of other active TX also goes up. As a result, the interfering power received at the RX is higher and
the channel coverage probability decreases. The channel coverage probability will converge to a constant
value as P1max increases even further, because the maximum transmit power of active TX has limited the
channel performance.
Comparing the curves for different ρ, we can see that for a given maximum harvested power of TX
P1max , increasing ρ improves the coverage probabilities. When ρ is higher, more energy is captured during
25
1
1
Coverage probability
Coverage probability
Pp =50 dBm
0.8
=0.2
=0.5
=0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Channel coverage probability
Total coverage probability
0
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
0.9
0.8
Pp =30 dBm
0.7
0.6
Channel coverage probability
Total coverage probability
0.5
20
Maximum harvested power Pmax
(dBm)
1
25
30
35
40
Maximum TX transmit power Pmax
(dBm)
2
Fig. 7: Channel coverage probability and total coverage probability
Fig. 8: Channel coverage probability and total coverage probability
versus allowed maximum harvested power P1max with different time
versus maximum TX transmit power P2max for different PB transmit
switching ratios.
power with the allowed maximum harvested power of TX being 50
dBm.
the PT phase. Therefore, the transmit power of active TX is now limited by the maximum transmit power
P2max . As a result, the channel coverage probability and total coverage probability converge and do not
vary much with the changes in the allowed maximum harvested power.
E. Feasibility of PB-assisted mmWave Wireless Ad hoc Networks
Finally, we investigate the feasibility of PB-assisted mmWave wireless ad hoc network. Fig. 8 is a plot
of the total coverage probability and channel coverage probability versus maximum TX transmit power
P2max with varied PB transmit power, 50 dBm and 30 dBm. To better highlight the impact of the maximum
transmit power at TX, we have set P1max equal to 50 dBm which is much higher than P2max . From the
figure, we can see that the channel coverage probability and total coverage probability do not change
much with the considered maximum TX transmit power, which means that the probability mass function
(PMF) of the transmit power for the desired TX remains almost the same. Note that the power coverage
probability is independent of the maximum transmit power of TX.
Insight: From Fig. 8, the total coverage probability and the channel coverage probability are around
90% if Pp is 50 dBm. If PB transmits with a constant power of 50 dBm, the power density at a distant of
1 m from the PB is 7.95 W/m2 . This power density is smaller than 10 W/m2 , which is the permissible
26
safety level of human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields based on IEEE Standard. Under this safety
regulation, the maximum permissible PB transmit power would be 51 dBm. We have marked this value
in Fig. 4(b). From Fig. 4(b), we can see that the total coverage probability with a PB transmit power
less than 51 dBm can be up to 93.4% of the maximum system performance, as given by the asymptotic
analysis in Section VI-B, based on our considered system parameters. The results in Fig. 4(b) and Fig. 8
show that PB-assisted mmWave ad hoc networks are feasible under practical network setup.
VII. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, we have presented an approximate yet accurate model for PB-assisted mmWave wireless
ad hoc networks, where TXs harvest energy from all PBs and then use the harvested energy to transmit
information to their corresponding RXs. We first obtained the Laplace transform of the aggregate received
power at the TX to compute the power coverage probability. Then, the channel coverage probability and
total coverage probability were formulated based on discretizing the transmit power of TXs into a finite
number of levels. The simulation results confirmed the accuracy of the proposed model. The results have
shown that the total coverage probability improves by increasing the transmit power of PB, narrowing the
main lobe beam-width and decreasing the maximum harvested power at the TX. Our results also showed
that PB-assisted mmWave ad hoc network is feasible under realistic setup conditions. Future work can
consider extensions to other MAC protocols such as carrier-sense multiple access (CSMA) [43], [44] and
optimal allocation of the transmit power of an active TX.
27
A PPENDIX A
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 1
Following the definition of Laplace transform, the Laplace transform of the aggregate received power
can be expressed as
LPPT (s) = EPPT [exp(−sPPT )] = Eφp ,Gi0 ,gi0 exp −sPp
X
Gi0 gi0 l(ri )
Zi ∈φp
"
!#
= Eφp ,Gi0 ,gi0 exp −sPp
X
"
Eφp ,Gi0 ,gi0 exp −sPp
Gi0 gi0 l(ri )
06ri <1
!#
X
Gi0 gi0 l(ri )
16ri <rmin
"
!#
× Eφp ,Gi0 ,gi0 exp −sPp
X
Gi0 gi0 l(ri )
rmin 6ri <rmax
Z πZ 1
EGi0 ,gi0 [1 − exp(−sPp Gi0 gi0 )]λp rdrdθ
= exp −
−π 0
{z
}
|
A1
Z π Z rmin
−αL
EGi0 ,gi0 [1−exp(−sPp Gi0 gi0 r )]λp rdrdθ
× exp −
−π 1
|
{z
}
A2
Z π Z rmax
−αN
EGi0 ,gi0 [1−exp(−sPp Gi0 gi0 βr )]λp rdrdθ .
× exp −
−π rmin
{z
}
|
(28)
A3
The first term A1 is evaluated as follows
A1 = exp (−πλp (1 − EGi0 ,gi0 [exp(−sPp Gi0 gi0 )]))
Z ∞
= exp −πλp 1 − EGi0
exp(−sPp Gi0 g)fgL (g)dg
0
= exp −πλp + πλp mm EGi0 (m + sPp Gi0 )−m
!
4
X
= exp −πλp + πλp mm
(m + sPp Gk )−m pk ,
(29)
k=1
where we use the fact that the link in LOS state experiences Nakagami-m fading with fgL (g) =
mm g m−1 exp(−mg)
.
Γ(m)
The second term A2 is evaluated as follows
−αL
2
A2 = exp πλp EGi0 ,gi0 [1 − exp(−sPp Gi0 gi0 )] − πλp rmin
EGi0 ,gi0 1 − exp(−srmin
Pp Gi0 gi0 )
h
i
δL δL
− πλp EGi0 ,gi0 (sPp Gi0 ) gi0 γ(1 − δL , sPp gi0 Gi0 )
h
i
δL
−αL
+πλp EGi0 ,gi0 (sPp Gi0 )δL gi0
γ(1 − δL , sPp gi0 Gi0 rmin
)
(30a)
28
m
= exp πλp −πλp m
4
X
−m
(m + sPp Gk )
2
pk −πλp rmin
k=1
+ πλp
4
X
(sPp Gk )δL
k=1
4
X
m
+
4
X
−αL
2
πλp rmin
mm (m + srmin
Pp Gk )−m pk
k=1
−δL−m
m
m (sPp Gk )
αL Γ(1+m)
pk
2 F1 1 + m,m + δL ;1 + m + δL ;−
(2 + mαL )Γ(m)
sPp Gk
−αL
mm (rmin
sPp Gk )−δL−m αL Γ(1+m)
(2 + mαL )Γ(m)
k=1
αL
rmin
m
pk ,
× 2 F1 1 + m,m + δL ;1 + m + δL ;−
sPp Gk
− πλp
(sPp Gk )δL
(30b)
where (30a) follows from changing variables and integration by parts and (30b) is obtained after taking
the expectation over gL then Gi0 .
Similarly, the third term A3 can be worked out by taking the expectation over gN , which has a PDF as
fgN (h) = exp(−g). The details are omitted for sake of brevity. Finally, the Laplace transform in Theorem 1
is obtained by substituting A1 , A2 and A3 into (28).
A PPENDIX B
P ROOF OF P ROPOSITION 1
By substituting (15) into (16), we can express the conditional channel coverage probability as
!
PX0 D0 h0 l(d0 )
C
Pcov (γTR ) = Pr P
> γTR
2
Xi ∈φactive PXi Di0 hi0 l(Xi ) + σ
!
PX0 D0 h0 l(d0 )
≈ Pr PN P
(31a)
> γTR
n
2
P
D
i0 hi0 l(Xi ) + σ
t
n=0
Xi ∈φn
t
γTR (IX + σ 2 )
γTR (IX + σ 2 )
= Pr h0 >
= EPX0 ,IX 1 − Fh0
,
(31b)
PX0 D0 l(d0 )
PX0 D0 l(d0 )
P
P
where approximation in (31a) comes from our power level discretization, IX = N
Ptn Di0 hi0 l(Xi )
n=0
Xi ∈φn
t
and Fh0 (·) is the CDF of the fading power gain on the reference TX-RX link. Since the desired link is
assumed to experience Nakagami-m fading with integer m, the CDF of h0 has a nice form, which is
P
1
l
Fh0 (h) = 1 − m−1
l=0 l! (mh) exp(−mh). Hence, we can re-write (31b) as
"m−1
l
#
2
2
X1
γ
(I
+
σ
)
γ
(I
+
σ
)
TR
X
TR
X
PC
m
exp −m
cov (γTR ) =EPX0 ,IX
l!
PX0 D0 l(d0 )
PX0 D0 l(d0 )
l=0
"
l
#
N m−1
X
X1
γTR (IX + σ 2 )
γTR (IX + σ 2 )
kn
=
EIX
m n
exp −m n
,
(32)
P
l!
Pt D0 l(d0 )
Pt D0 l(d0 )
Pcov (γPT )
n=0 l=0
29
where the PMF of PX0 is Pr(PX0 = Ptn ) =
kn
PP
cov (γPT )
in (32), as we assume that the desired TX is active.
The general form of the Laplace transform of IX + σ 2 is LIX +σ2 (s) = EIX [exp(−s(IX + σ 2 ))]. Taking
lth derivative with respect to s, we achieve
dl
dl
2
LIX +σ2 (s) = EIX
exp(−s(IX + σ )) = EIX (−IX − σ 2 )l exp(−s(IX + σ 2 )) .
l
l
ds
ds
(33)
Comparing (33) with the expectation term in (32), we have
PC
cov (γTR )
where s =
mγTR
.
Ptn D0 l(d0 )
N m−1
X
X (−s)l dl
kn
=
,
LIX +σ2 (s) P
l
l!
ds
P
(γ
)
PT
cov
n=0 l=0
(34)
Hence, we arrive the result in Proposition 1.
R EFERENCES
[1] X. Lu, P. Wang, D. Niyato, D. I. Kim, and Z. Han, “Wireless networks with RF energy harvesting: A contemporary survey,” IEEE
Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 757–789, Second-quarter 2015.
[2] H. Tabassum, E. Hossain, A. Ogundipe, and D. I. Kim, “Wireless-powered cellular networks: key challenges and solution techniques,”
IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 63–71, Jun. 2015.
[3] Y. Zeng, B. Clerckx, and R. Zhang, “Communications and signals design for wireless power transmission,” IEEE Trans. Commun.,
vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 2264–2290, May 2017.
[4] R. Zhang and C. K. Ho, “MIMO broadcasting for simultaneous wireless information and power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1989–2001, May 2013.
[5] A. A. Nasir, X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and R. A. Kennedy, “Relaying protocols for wireless energy harvesting and information processing,”
IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3622–3636, Jul. 2013.
[6] (2017, Mar.) CES 2017 Innovation Awards. [Online]. Available: http://www.ces.tech/Events-Experiences/Innovation-Awards-Program/
Honorees.aspx
[7] Y. Ma, H. Chen, Z. Lin, Y. Li, and B. Vucetic, “Distributed and optimal resource allocation for power beacon-assisted wireless-powered
communications,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 3569–3583, Oct. 2015.
[8] C. Zhong, X. Chen, Z. Zhang, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Wireless-powered communications: Performance analysis and optimization,”
IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 5178–5190, Dec. 2015.
[9] X. Jiang, C. Zhong, Z. Zhang, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Power beacon assisted wiretap channels with jamming,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 8353–8367, Dec. 2016.
[10] K. Huang and V. K. N. Lau, “Enabling wireless power transfer in cellular networks: Architecture, modeling and deployment,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 902–912, Feb. 2014.
[11] S. Lee, R. Zhang, and K. Huang, “Opportunistic wireless energy harvesting in cognitive radio networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun.,
vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 4788–4799, Sep. 2013.
30
[12] Z. Wang, L. Duan, and R. Zhang, “Adaptively directional wireless power transfer for large-scale sensor networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 1785–1800, May 2016.
[13] Y. Liu, L. Wang, S. A. R. Zaidi, M. Elkashlan, and T. Q. Duong, “Secure D2D communication in large-scale cognitive cellular networks:
A wireless power transfer model,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 329–342, Jan. 2016.
[14] J. Guo, S. Durrani, X. Zhou, and H. Yanikomeroglu, “Outage probability of ad hoc networks with wireless information and power
transfer,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 409–412, Aug. 2015.
[15] T. S. Rappaport, S. Sun, R. Mayzus, H. Zhao, Y. Azar, K. Wang, G. N. Wong, J. K. Schulz, M. Samimi, and F. Gutierrez, “Millimeter
wave mobile communications for 5G cellular: It will work!” IEEE Access, vol. 1, pp. 335–349, 2013.
[16] J. G. Andrews, T. Bai, M. N. Kulkarni, A. Alkhateeb, A. K. Gupta, and R. W. Heath, “Modeling and analyzing millimeter wave cellular
systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 403–430, Jan. 2017.
[17] M. D. Renzo, “Stochastic geometry modeling and analysis of multi-tier millimeter wave cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 5038–5057, Sep. 2015.
[18] K. Venugopal, M. C. Valenti, and R. W. Heath, “Device-to-device millimeter wave communications: Interference, coverage, rate, and
finite topologies,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 6175–6188, Sep. 2016.
[19] D. Maamari, N. Devroye, and D. Tuninetti, “Coverage in mmWave cellular networks with base station co-operation,” IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 2981–2994, Apr. 2016.
[20] T. A. Khan, A. Alkhateeb, and R. W. Heath, “Millimeter wave energy harvesting,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 9, pp.
6048–6062, Sep. 2016.
[21] L. Wang, M. Elkashlan, R. W. Heath, M. D. Renzo, and K. K. Wong, “Millimeter wave power transfer and information transmission,”
in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM, Dec. 2015.
[22] X. Zhou, S. Durrani, and J. Guo, “Characterization of aggregate received power from power beacons in millimeter wave ad hoc
networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICC, May 2017.
[23] A. Biason and M. Zorzi, “Joint transmission and energy transfer policies for energy harvesting devices with finite batteries,” IEEE J.
Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2626–2640, Dec. 2015.
[24] A. Ghazanfari, H. Tabassum, and E. Hossain, “Ambient RF energy harvesting in ultra-dense small cell networks: performance and
trade-offs,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 38–45, Apr. 2016.
[25] E. Boshkovska, D. W. K. Ng, N. Zlatanov, and R. Schober, “Practical non-linear energy harvesting model and resource allocation for
SWIPT systems,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2082–2085, Dec. 2015.
[26] M. Xia and S. Aissa, “On the efficiency of far-field wireless power transfer,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 2835–2847,
Jun. 2015.
[27] M. D. Renzo, W. Lu, and P. Guan, “The intensity matching approach: A tractable stochastic geometry approximation to system-level
analysis of cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 5963–5983, Sep. 2016.
[28] T. Bai and R. W. Heath, “Coverage and rate analysis for millimeter-wave cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 14,
no. 2, pp. 1100–1114, Feb. 2015.
31
[29] M. D. Renzo and W. Lu, “System-level analysis and optimization of cellular networks with simultaneous wireless information and
power transfer: Stochastic geometry modeling,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 2251–2275, Mar. 2017.
[30] M. R. Akdeniz, Y. Liu, M. K. Samimi, S. Sun, S. Rangan, T. S. Rappaport, and E. Erkip, “Millimeter wave channel modeling and
cellular capacity evaluation,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1164–1179, Jun. 2014.
[31] X. Zhang and J. G. Andrews, “Downlink cellular network analysis with multi-slope path loss models,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63,
no. 5, pp. 1881–1894, May 2015.
[32] S. Al-Ahmadi and H. Yanikomeroglu, “On the approximation of the generalized-k distribution by a gamma distribution for modeling
composite fading channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 706–713, Feb. 2010.
[33] G. Lee, Y. Sung, and J. Seo, “Randomly-directional beamforming in millimeter-wave multiuser MISO downlink,” IEEE Trans. Wireless
Commun., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1086–1100, Feb. 2016.
[34] M. Haenggi, Stochastic Geometry for Wireless Networks.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[35] A. Thornburg, T. Bai, and R. W. Heath, “Performance analysis of outdoor mmWave ad hoc networks,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process.,
vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 4065–4079, Aug. 2016.
[36] M. D. Renzo and P. Guan, “Stochastic geometry modeling of coverage and rate of cellular networks using the Gil-Pelaez inversion
theorem,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1575–1578, Sep. 2014.
[37] Y.-C. Ko, M.-S. Alouini, and M. K. Simon, “Outage probability of diversity systems over generalized fading channels,” IEEE Trans.
Commun., vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 1783–1787, Nov. 2000.
[38] J. Guo, S. Durrani, and X. Zhou, “Outage probability in arbitrarily-shaped finite wireless networks,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 62,
no. 2, pp. 699–712, Feb. 2014.
[39] I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 7th ed.
Academic Press, 2007.
[40] S. Akbar, Y. Deng, A. Nallanathan, M. Elkashlan, and A. H. Aghvami, “Simultaneous wireless information and power transfer in
K-tier heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 5804–5818, Aug. 2016.
[41] A. H. Sakr and E. Hossain, “Analysis of K-tier uplink cellular networks with ambient RF energy harvesting,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas
Commun., vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 2226–2238, Oct. 2015.
[42] ——, “Cognitive and energy harvesting-based D2D communication in cellular networks: Stochastic geometry modeling and analysis,”
IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1867–1880, May 2015.
[43] H. ElSawy and E. Hossain, “A modified hard core point process for analysis of random CSMA wireless networks in general fading
environments,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 1520–1534, Apr. 2013.
[44] M. Kaynia, N. Jindal, and G. E. Øien, “Improving the performance of wireless ad hoc networks through MAC layer desgin,” IEEE
Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 240–252, Jan. 2011.
| 7cs.IT
|
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN
CHARACTERISTIC 2
arXiv:1512.02289v2 [math.RA] 5 Aug 2016
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
Abstract. In 2012 the second author obtained a description of the lattice of subgroups of a
Chevalley group G(Φ, A), containing the elementary subgroup E(Φ, K) over a subring K ⊆ A
provided Φ = Bn , Cn or F4 , n > 2, and 2 is invertible in K. It turns out that this lattice is
a disjoint union of “sandwiches” parameterized by subrings R such that K ⊆ R ⊆ A.
In the current article a similar result is proved for Φ = Cn , n > 3, and 2 = 0 in K. In this
setting one has to introduce more sandwiches, namely, sandwiches which are parameterized
by form rings (R, Λ) such that K ⊆ Λ ⊆ R ⊆ A. The result we get generalizes Ya. N. Nuzhin’s
theorem of 2013 concerning the root systems Φ = Bn , Cn , n > 3, where the same description
of the subgroup lattice is obtained, but under the condition that A is an algebraic extension
of a field K.
Introduction
Throughout this paper K, R and A will denote commutative rings. Let G = GP (Φ, )
denote a Chevalley–Demazure group scheme with a reduced irreducible root system Φ and
weight lattice P . If the weight lattice P is not important, we leave it out of the notation.
Denote by E(A) = EP (Φ, A) the elementary subgroup of G(A), i. e. the subgroup generated
by all elementary root unipotent elements
xα (t), α ∈ Φ, t ∈ A. Let K be a subring of A.
We study the lattice L = L E(K), G(A) of subgroups of G(A), containing E(K).
The standard description of L is called a sandwich classification theorem. It states that
for each H ∈ L there exists a unique subring R between K and A suchthat H lies between
E(R) and its normalizer NA (R) in G(A). The lattice L E(R), NA (R) of all subgroups of
G(A) that lie between E(R) and NA (R) is called a standard sandwich. Thus, the sandwich
classification theorem holds iff L is the disjoint union of all standard sandwiches. In [17] the
second author proved the sandwich classification theorem provided that Φ is doubly laced
and 2 is invertible in K.
In this article we consider the symplectic case of rank n > 3 with 2 = 0 in A, in particular,
we always assume that Φ = Cn . In this situation we show that the sandwich classification
theorem, as formulated above, does not hold. Let R be a subring of A, containing K.
Recall [5] that an additive subgroup Λ of R is called a (symplectic) form parameter if it
contains 2R and is closed under multiplication by ξ 2 for all ξ ∈ R. If 2 = 0, the set
R2 = {ξ 2 | ξ ∈ R} is a subring of R, and a form parameter Λ in R is just an R2 -submodule
of R. Let Ep2n (R, Λ) denote the subgroup of Sp2n (R) generated by all root unipotents xα (µ)
and xβ (λ), where α is a short root and µ ∈ R and β is a long root and λ ∈ Λ. Suppose
now that Λ ⊇ K. Then clearly Ep2n (R, Λ) > Ep2n (K). But one can check that
if Λ 6= R
′
′
then Ep2n (R, Λ) is not contained in any standard sandwich L Ep2n (R ), NA (R ) such that
K ⊆ R′ . This shows that L cannot be a union of standard sandwiches, unless we enlarge our
standard sandwiches or introduce additional ones. It turns out that the latter approach is
the correct one. It is analogous to that followed by the first author in [3] and by E. Abe and
The work of the second named author under this publication is supported by Russian
Science Foundation, grant N.14-11-00297.
1
2
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
K.Suzuki in [2, 1] in order to provide enough sandwiches to classify subgroups of Sp2n (R),
which are normalized by Ep2n (R).
If A and K are field and A is algebraic over K, then the sandwich classification theorem
was obtained by Ya. N. Nuzhin in [14, 15]. In [15] he considered the case of doubly laced root
systems in characteristic 2 and G2 in characteristics 2 and 3. In all these cases sandwiches were
parameterized by pairs; each pair consists of a subring and an additive subgroup, satisfying
certain properties.
Let F be a field of characteristic 2. Then there are injections Sp2n (F ) SO2n+1 (F )
Sp2n (F ), which turn to isomorphisms if F is perfect, see [16] Theorem 28, Example (a)
after this theorem, and Remark before Theorem 29. Note that in this case the Chevalley
groups GP (Cn , F ) and GP (Bn , F ) do not depend on the weight lattice P ([16], Exercise after
′
Corollary 5 to Theorem
4 ). Therefore, the lattice L E(Φ, K), G(Φ, F ) embeds to the lattice
L Ep2n (F2 ), Sp2n (F ) for Φ = Bn , Cn and a subring K of F , and its description follows from
the main result of the current article.
Actually, the injections above are constructed in [16] on the level of Steinberg groups.
Since over a field K2 (Φ, F ) is generated by Steinberg symbols, they induce the injections of
Chevalley groups. Over a ring A there is no appropriate description of K2 available, therefore
we can not use the above arguments. Moreover, in the ring case the group GP (Φ, A) depends
on P . By these reasons, the adjoint group of type Cn and groups of type Bn over rings will
be considered in a subsequent article.
We state now our main result. Following [5], we call a pair (R, Λ) consisting of a ring R
and a form parameter Λ in R a form ring.
Theorem 1. Let A denote a (commutative) ring such 2 = 0 in A. Let K be a subring of A.
If H is a subgroup of Sp2n (A) containing Ep2n (K), n > 3, then there is a unique form ring
(R, Λ) such that K ⊆ Λ ⊆ R ⊆ A and
Ep2n (R, Λ) 6 H 6 NA (R, Λ),
where NA (R, Λ) is the normalizer of Ep2n (R, Λ) in Sp2n (A).
Let L(R, Λ) = L Ep2n (R, Λ), NA (R, Λ) denote the lattice of all subgroups H of Sp2n (A)
such that Ep2n (R, Λ) 6 H 6 NA (R, Λ). From now on, L(R, Λ) is what we shall mean by
a standard sandwich. In view of Theorem 1 it is natural to study the lattice structure of
L(R, Λ). By definition Ep2n (R, Λ) is normal in NA (R, Λ). Therefore the lattice structure of
L(R, Λ) is the same as that of the quotient group NA (R, Λ)/ Ep2n (R, Λ). The lattice L(R, Λ)
contains an important subgroup Sp2n (R, Λ), which is called a Bak symplectic group, whose
definition will be recalled in Section 1. A group will be called quasi-nilpotent if it is a direct
limit of nilpotent subgroups, i. e. the group has a directed system of nilpotent subgroups
whose colimit is the group itself.
In the following result we use the notion of Bass–Serre dimension of a ring introduced by
the first author in [6, § 4]. Recall that the Krull (or combinatorial) dimension of a topological
space is the supremum of the lengths of proper chains of nonempty closed irreducible subsets.
Bass–Serre dimension d = BS-dim R of a ring R is the smallest integer such that the maximal
spectrum Max R is a union of a finite number of irreducible Noetherian subspaces of Krull
dimension not greater than d. If there is no such integer, then BS-dim R = ∞.
Theorem 2. Let A denote a (commutative) ring and let R be a subring of A and (R, Λ) a
form ring. Suppose n > 2.
1. Sp2n (R, Λ) = Sp2n (R) ∩ NA (R, Λ).
2. Sp2n (R, Λ) is normal in NA (R, Λ).
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
3
3. NA (R, Λ)/ Sp2n (R, Λ) is abelian.
4. Sp2n (R, Λ)/ Ep2n (R, Λ) is quasi-nilpotent.
5. Let R0 denotes the subring of R, generated by all elements ξ 2 such that ξ ∈ R. If
Bass–Serre dimension of R0 is finite, then Sp2n (R, Λ)/ Ep2n (R, Λ) is nilpotent.
In particular, the sandwich quotient group NA (R, Λ)/ Ep2n (R, Λ) is quasi-nilpotent by abelian
or nilpotent by abelian if BS-dim R0 < ∞.
Although Theorem 1 is proven under the assumptions 2 = 0 and n > 3, we do not invoke
these assumptions until the proof of the theorem in Section 6. In particular, Theorem 2 is
proven without these assumptions. Of course, we always assume that n > 2.
Notation. Let H be a group. For two elements x, y ∈ H we write [x, y] = xyx−1 y −1 for
their commutator and xy = y −1xy for the y-conjugate of x. For subgroups X, Y 6 H we
let X Y denote the normal closure of X in the subgroup generated by X and Y , while [X, Y ]
stands for the mixed commutator group generated by X and Y . By definition it is the group
generated by all commutators [x, y] such that x ∈ X and y ∈ Y . The commutator subgroup
[X, X] of X will be also denoted by D(X) and we set D k (X) = D k−1 (X), D k−1(X) . Recall
that a group X is called perfect if D(X) = X.
The identity matrix is denoted by e as well as the identity element of a Chevalley group.
We denote by eij the matrix with 1 in position (ij) and zeroes elsewhere. The entries of
a matrix g are denoted by gij . For the entries of the inverse matrix we use abbreviation
(g −1)ij = gij′ . The transpose of the matrix g is denoted by g T, thus (g T )ij = gji .
1. The symplectic group
The symplectic group Sp2n (R), its elementary root unipotent elements, and its elementary subgroup Ep2n (R) will be recalled below. The groups Sp2n (R, Λ) and their elementary
subgroups Ep2n (R, Λ) will be defined in Section 2.
Since the groups Sp2n (R, Λ) are not in general algebraic (in fact, Sp2n (R, Λ) is algebraic
iff Λ = R or Λ = {0}), it is convenient to work with the standard matrix representation of
Sp2n (R). On the other hand, we want to use the notions of parabolic subgroup, unipotent
radical, etc. from the theory of algebraic groups. Thus, to simplify the exposition, we define
below these notions directly in terms of the matrix representation we use.
Following Bourbaki [9] we view the root system Cn and its set of fundamental roots Π in
the following way. Let Vn denote n-dimensional euclidean space with the orthonormal basis
ε1 , . . . , εn . Let
Cn = {±εi ± εj | 1 6 i < j 6 n} ∪ {±2εk | 1 6 k 6 n},
Π = {αi = εi − εi+1 , where i = 1, . . . , n − 1, αn = 2εn }.
The elements ±εi ± εj are called short roots and the elements ±2εk long roots.
From the perspective of algebraic groups, we want the standard Borel subgroup of Sp2n (R)
to be the group of all upper triangular matrices in Sp2n (R). Accordingly, we take the following
matrix description of Sp2n (R). Let J denote the
n × n-matrix with 1 in each antidiagonal
0 J
position and zeroes elsewhere. Let F = −J 0 . Then, the group Sp2n (R) is the subgroup
of GL2n (R) consisting of all matrices which preserve the bilinear form whose matrix is F . In
other words,
Sp2n (R) = {g ∈ GL2n (R) | g T F g = F }.
Let I = (1, . . . , n, −n, . . . , −1) denote the linearly ordered set whose linear ordering is
obtained by reading from left to right. We enumerate the rows and columns of the matrices
4
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
of GL2n (R) by indexes from I. Thus the position of a coordinate of a matrix in GL2n (R) is
denoted by a pair (i, j) ∈ I × I.
In the language of algebraic groups the set of all diagonal matrices in Sp2n (R) is a maximal
torus. Let e denote the 2n × 2n identity matrix. The following matrices are elementary root
unipotent elements of Sp2n (R) with respect to the torus above:
xεi −εj (ξ) = Tij (ξ) = T−j,−i (−ξ) = e + ξeij − ξe−j,−i,
xεi +εj (ξ) = Ti,−j (ξ) = Tj,−i (ξ) = e + ξei,−j + ξej,−i ,
x−εi −εj (ξ) = T−i,j (ξ) = T−j,i (ξ) = e + ξe−i,j + ξe−j,i ,
x2εk (ξ) = Tk,−k (ξ) = e + ξek,−k ,
x−2εk (ξ) = T−k,k (ξ) = e + ξe−k,k ,
where ξ ∈ R, 1 6 i, j, k 6 n, i 6= j.
Note that the subscripts (i, j), (i, j), (i, −j), (j, −i), (−j, −i), (k, −k), and (−k, k) on the
T above all belong to the set C̃n = I × I \ {(k, k) | k ∈ I} of nondiagonal positions of a
matrix from Sp2n (R) and exhaust C̃n .
There is a surjective map p : C̃n → Cn defined by the following rule.
p(i, j) = p(−j, −i) = εi − εj ;
p(i, −j) = p(j, −i) = εi + εj ;
p(−i, j) = p(−j, i) = −εi − εj ;
p(k, −k) = 2εk ;
p(−k, k) = −2εk ;
where ξ ∈ R, 1 6 i, j, k 6 n, i 6= j.
With this notation the correspondence between elementary symplectic transvections Tij (ξ)
and root elements xα (ξ) looks as follows.
Tij (ξ) = xp(i,j) (− sign(ij)ξ)
for all i 6= j ∈ I.
Note that p maps symmetric (with respect to the antidiagonal) positions to the same root.
Therefore, for (ij) ∈ I and ξ ∈ R we have Ti,j (ξ) = T−j,−i (− sign(ij)ξ).
The root subgroup scheme Xα is defined by Xα (R) = {xα (ξ) | ξ ∈ R}. The scheme Xα
is naturally isomorphic to Ga , i. e. xα (ξ)xα (µ) = xα (ξ + µ) for all ξ, µ ∈ R. The following
commutator formulas are well known in matrix language, cf. [8, § 3]. They are special cases
of the Chevalley commutator formula in the algebraic group theory.
c = 2π/3;
[xα (λ), xβ (µ)] = xα+β (±λµ), if α + β ∈ Φ, αβ
c = π/2;
[xα (λ), xβ (µ)] = xα+β (±2λµ), if α + β ∈ Φ, αβ
c = 3π/4;
[xα (λ), xβ (µ)] = xα+β (±λµ)xα+2β (±λµ2 ), if α + β, α + 2β ∈ Φ, αβ
[xα (λ), xβ (µ)] = e, if α + β ∈
/ Φ ∪ {0}
In our proofs we make frequent use of the parabolic subgroup P1 of Sp2n . In the matrix
language above it is defined as follows:
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
5
P1 (R) = {g ∈ Sp2n R | gi1 = g−1−i = 0 ∀i 6= 1}
−1
The definition above of Sp2n (R) shows that g11 = g−1,−1
for any matrix g ∈ P1 (R). The
unipotent radical U1 of P1 is the subgroup generated by all root subgroups T1i such that
i 6= 1. The Levi subgroup L1 (R) of P1 (R) consists of all g ∈ P1 (R) such that g1i = g−i,−1 = 0
for all i 6= 1. As a group scheme it is isomorphic to Gm × Sp2n−2 .
2. Bak symplectic groups
The Bak symplectic group Sp2n (R, Λ) is the particular case of the Bak general unitary
group, where the involution is trivial and the symmetry λ = −1. The main references for the
definition and the structure of the general unitary group is the book [5] and the paper [8] by
N. Vavilov and the first author. In this section we recall definitions and simple properties to
be used in the sequel.
Let R be a commutative ring. An additive subgroup Λ of R is called a symplectic form
parameter in R, if it contains 2R and is closed under multiplication by squares, i. e. µ2 λ ∈ Λ
for all µ ∈ R and λ ∈ Λ. Define Sp2n (R, Λ) as the subgroup of Sp2n (R) consisting of all
matrices preserving the quadratic form which takes values in R/Λ and is defined by the
matrix ( 00 J0 ).
Let ∗ denote the involution on the matrix ring Mn (R) given by the formula a∗ = JaT J.
Note that this is the reflection of a matrix with respect to the antidiagonal. Define
Mn (R, Λ) = {a ∈ Mn (R) | a = a∗ , an−k+1 k ∈ Λ for all k = 1, . . . , n}.
Write a matrix of degree 2n in the block form ( ac db ), where a, b, c, d ∈ Mn (R). It follows
from [8, Lemma 2.2] and its proof that under the notation above we have the following
formula.
a b
∗
∗
∗
∗
Lemma 2.1. Sp2n (R, Λ) =
| a d − c b = e and c a, d b ∈ Mn (R, Λ) .
c d
It is easy to check that Mn (R, Λ) is a form parameter in the ring Mn (R) with involution
∗, corresponding to the symmetry λ = −1. The minimal form parameter in Mn (R) with the
same involution and symmetry is Mn (R, 2R); it is denoted by Minn (R). Let M̄n (R, Λ) denote
the additive group Mn (R, Λ)/ Minn (R).
Lemma 2.2. The group M̄n (R, Λ) has a natural structure of a left Mn (R)-module under the
operation a ◦ b̄ = aba∗ mod Minn (R), where a ∈ Mn (R), b̄ ∈ M̄n (R, Λ), and b is a preimage
of b̄ in Mn (R, Λ).
By abuse of notation for a ∈ Mn (R) and b ∈ Mn (R, Λ) we shall write a ◦ b instead of
a ◦ (b + Minn (R)).
It is easy to check that an elementary root unipotent element xα (ξ) ∈ Sp2n (R) belongs
to Sp2n (R, Λ) if and only if α is a short root or ξ ∈ Λ. Denote by Ep2n (R, Λ) the group
generated by all such elements:
Ep2n (R, Λ) = hxα (ξ) | α ∈ Cnshort & ξ ∈ R ∨ α ∈ Cnlong & ξ ∈ Λi.
3. Subgroups generated by elementary root unipotents
In this section we assume that n > 3. Let H be a subgroup of Sp2n (A), containing Ep2n (K).
The following lemma shows that we can uncouple a short root element from a long one inside
H.
6
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
Lemma 3.1. Let α, β ∈ Cn be a short and a long root, respectively, such that α + β is not a
root. Let g = xα (µ)xβ (λ), where λ, µ ∈ A. If Ep2n (K)g 6 H (e. g. g ∈ H), then each factor
of g belongs to H.
Proof. Since n > 3, there exists a short root γ such that γ + α is a short root and γ + β is not
a root. Then, Xβ (A) commutes with Xα (A) and Xγ (A), hence [g, xγ (1)] = xα+γ (±µ) ∈ H.
Conjugating this element by an appropriate element from the Weyl group over K and taking
the inverse if necessary, we get xα (µ) ∈ H. It follows that Ep2n (K)xβ (λ) 6 H.
Now, take a short root δ such that β+δ is a root. Then, [xδ (1), xβ (λ)] = xδ+β (±λ)x2δ+β (±λ) ∈
H. Notice that the root δ + β is short whereas 2δ + β is long. As in the first paragraph of
the proof one concludes that xδ+β (±λ) ∈ H, hence x2δ+β (±λ) ∈ H. Again, using the action
of the Weyl group and taking inverse if necessary, one shows that xβ (λ) ∈ H.
Put Pα (H) = {t ∈ A | xα (t) ∈ H}. Since the Weyl group acts transitively on the set of roots
of the same length, it is easy to see that Pα (H) = Pβ (H) if |α| = |β|. Let R = RH = Pα (H)
for any short root α, and let Λ = ΛH = Pβ (H) for any long root β.
Lemma 3.2. With the above notation (R, Λ) is a form ring and K ⊆ Λ ⊆ R ⊆ A.
Proof. Clearly, Pα (H) is an additive subgroup of A. Since n > 3, there are two short roots
α, α′ such that α + α′ also is short. The commutator formula
[xα (λ), xα′ (µ)] = xα+α′ (±λµ)
shows that R is a ring.
Now, let α, α′ be short roots which are orthogonal in Vn and such that β = α + α′ ∈ Φ is
a long root. Then
[xα (µ), xα′ (1)] = xβ (±2µ).
If µ ∈ R, then this element belongs to H. This proves that 2R ⊆ Λ. Finally, we show that
Λ is closed under multiplication by squares in R. Let
g = [xβ (λ), x−α (µ)] = xα′ (±λµ)xβ−2α (±λµ2 )
If λ ∈ Λ and µ = 1, then g ∈ H, and Lemma 3.1 shows that xα′ (±λ) ∈ H. Therefore, Λ ⊆ R.
On the other hand, if µ ∈ R and λ ∈ Λ, then g also lies in H, and by Lemma 3.1 we have
xβ−2α (±λµ2 ) ∈ H. This shows that Λ is stable under multiplication by squares of elements
of R.
If H is a subgroup of Sp2n (A) containing Ep2n (K), then (RH , ΛH ) is called the form ring
associated with H.
4. The normalizer
Let (R, Λ) be a form subring of a ring A such that 1 ∈ Λ. In this section we develop properties of the normalizer NA (R, Λ) of the group Ep2n (R, Λ) in Sp2n (A) and prove Theorem 2.
Here we do not assume that n > 3. By a result of Bak and Vavilov [7, Theorem 1.1] we know
that Ep2n (R, Λ) is normal in Sp2n (R, Λ), thus Sp2n (R, Λ) 6 NA (R, Λ). First, we show that
the quotient NA (R, Λ)/ Sp2n (R, Λ) is abelian.
Lemma 4.1. Let g ∈ Sp2n (A). If Ep2n (R, Λ)g 6 GL2n (R) then gij gkl ∈ R for all i, j, k, l ∈ I.
P
Proof. To begin we express a matrix unit ejk as a linear combination
ξm a(m) for some
(m)
ξm ∈ R and a
∈ Ep2n (R, Λ). Note that the set of such linear combinations is closed under
multiplication. Suppose j 6= k and let i 6= ±j, ±k. Then ejk = (Tji (1) − e)(Tik (1) − e)
and ejj = ejk ekj . It follows that if Ep2n (R, Λ)g 6 GL2n (R), then g −1 ejk g ∈ Mn (R). Thus
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
7
gij′ gkl ∈ R for all i, j, k, l ∈ I (recall that gij′ = (g −1 )ij ). The conclusion of the lemma follows
since the entries of g −1 coincide with the entries of g up to sign and a permutation.
The next proposition describes the normalizer in the case A = R.
Proposition 4.2. NR (R, Λ) = Sp2n (R, Λ).
Proof. Let g = ( ac db ) ∈ NR (R, Λ). Since g ∈ Sp2n (R), then d∗ a − b∗ c = e. We have to prove
that c∗ a, d∗ b ∈ Mn (R, Λ). Since h = ( 0e Je ) ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ), we have
e − aJc∗
aJa∗
−1
∈ Ep2n (R, Λ)
f = ghg =
−cJc∗ e + cJa∗
It follows that the matrices −(cJc∗ )∗ (e − aJc∗ ) and (e + cJa∗ )∗ (aJa∗ ) belong to Mn (R, Λ).
Since cJc∗ and aJa∗ are automatically in Mn (R, Λ), we have that cJc∗ aJc∗ , aJc∗ aJa∗ ∈
Mn (R, Λ). Modulo Minn (R) we can write (cJ)◦(c∗a), (aJ)◦(c∗ a) ∈ M̄n (R, Λ). By Lemma 2.2
M̄n (R, Λ) is an Mn (R) module, therefore
c∗ a + Minn (R) = J(d∗ a − b∗ c)J ◦ (c∗ a) =
(Jd∗ ) ◦ (aJ) ◦ (c∗ a) − (Jb∗ ) ◦ (cJ) ◦ (c∗ a) ∈ M̄n (R, Λ).
The proof that d∗ b ∈ Mn (R, Λ) is essentially the same.
Corollary 4.3. [NA (R, Λ), NA (R, Λ)] 6 Sp2n (R, Λ).
Proof. If g, h ∈ NA (R, Λ) and f = [g, h], then by Lemma 4.1 for all indexes p, q we have
fpq =
n
X
i,j,k=1
′ ′
gpi
hij gjk hkq
=
n
X
′
(gpi
gjk )(h′ij hkq ) ∈ R
i,j,k=1
Therefore,
f ∈ Sp2n (R) ∩ NA (R, Λ) = NR (R, Λ) = Sp2n (R, Λ).
The first 3 items of Theorem 2 are already proved. Our next goal is to show that the main
theorem of [12] implies that Sp2n (R, Λ)/ Ep2n (R, Λ) is nilpotent, provided that R0 has finite
Bass–Serre dimension. This will imply the rest of Theorem 2. Recall that R0 denotes the
subring of R generated by all elements ξ 2 such that ξ ∈ R.
Lemma 4.4. If R0 is semilocal and 1 ∈ Λ, then Sp2n (R, Λ) = Ep2n (R, Λ).
Proof. Since R is integral over R0 , it is a direct limit of R0 -subalgebras R′ ⊆ R such that R′
is module finite and integral over R0 . By the first theorem of Cohen–Seidenberg, each R′ is
semilocal. Thus by [4, Lemma 4] Sp2n (R′ , Λ ∩ R′ ) = Ep2n (R′ , Λ ∩ R′ ) for each R′ . Since Sp2n
and Ep2n commute with direct limits, it follows that Sp2n (R, Λ) = Ep2n (R, Λ).
Lemma 4.5. If R is a finitely generated Z-algebra then so is R0 .
Proof. Since 2ξ = (ξ + 1)2 − ξ 2 − 1, we have 2R ⊆ Q
R0 . Let S be a finite set of generators
2
for R as a Z-algebra. We set S0 = {s | s ∈ S} ∪ {2 s∈S ′ s | S ′ ⊆ S} and denote by R1 the
Z-subalgebra generated by S0 . Clearly, 2R ⊆ R1 . The map ξ 7→ ξ 2 is a ring epimorphism
R/2R → R0 /2R, therefore R0 /2R is generated by the images of generators of R. It follows
that R0 /2R = R1 /2R, hence R0 = R1 is finitely generated.
8
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
Proof of Theorem 2. Since NR (R, Λ) = NA (R, Λ) ∩ Sp2n (R), the first statement follows from
Proposition 4.2, the second is a particular case of [7, Theorem 1.1], and the third one coincides
with Corollary 4.3.
Recall that Sp02n (R, Λ) = ∩ϕ Ker ϕ, where ϕ ranges over all group homomorphisms Sp2n (R, Λ) →
Sp2n (R̃, Λ̃′ )/ Ep2n (R̃, Λ̃) induced by form ring morphisms (R, Λ) → (R̃, Λ̃) such that R̃0 is
semilocal. By Lemma 4.4 Sp02n (R, Λ) = Sp2n (R, Λ).
Since R is integral over R0 , it is a direct limit of R0 -subalgebras R′ ⊆ R such that R′ is
module finite over R0 . By [12][Theorem 3.10] the group Sp02n (R′ , Λ ∩ R′ )/ Ep2n (R′ , Λ ∩ R′ ) is
nilpotent, provided that R0 has finite Bass–Serre dimension. Since Sp2n and Ep2n commute
with direct limits, this proves (5).
Any commutative ring is a direct limit of finitely generated Z-algebras. Let R = inj lim R(i) ,
where i ranges over some index set I and each R(i) is a finitely generated Z-algebra. Then
(i)
R0 = inj lim R0 and Sp2n (R, Λ ∩ R)/ Ep2n (R, Λ) = inj lim Sp(R(i) , Λ ∩ R(i) )/ Ep2n (R(i) , Λ ∩
(i)
R(i) ). By Lemma 4.5 each R0 is a finitely generated Z-algebra. Therefore, this ring has
finite Krull dimension and hence finite Bass–Serre dimension. By (5) each group Sp(R(i) , Λ ∩
R(i) )/ Ep2n (R(i) , Λ ∩ R(i) ) is nilpotent which implies item (4).
The following statement is crucial for the proof of our main theorem. For Noetherian rings
it is almost immediate consequence of Theorem 2.
Lemma 4.6. Let g ∈ Sp2n (A), n > 3. If Ep2n (R, Λ)g 6 NA (R, Λ), then g ∈ NA (R, Λ).
Moreover, Ep2n (R, Λ) is a characteristic subgroup of NA (R, Λ).
Proof. Let θ be either an automorphism of NA (R, Λ) or an automorphism of Sp2n (A) such
that Ep2n (R, Λ)θ 6 NA (R, Λ) (we denote by hθ the image of an element h ∈ NA (R) under
the action of θ). Since n > 3, the Chevalley commutator formula (see section 1) implies that
the group Ep2n (R, Λ) is perfect. By Corollary 4.3 we have
Ep2n (R, Λ)θ = [Ep2n (R, Λ), Ep2n (R, Λ)]θ 6
[NA (R, Λ), NA (R, Λ)] 6 Sp2n (R, Λ).
We shall prove that hθ ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ) for any h ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ). Write h as a product of elementary root unipotents xα1 (s1 ) · · · xαm (sm ). Let R′ denote the Z-subalgebra of R generated
by all si ’s, and let Λ′ denote the form parameter of R′ generated by those sj for which αj
is a long root. Clearly h ∈ Ep2n (R′ , Λ′) and Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ ) is a finitely generated group. Let
R′′ denote the R′ -algebra generated by all entries of the matrices y θ , where y ranges over all
generators of Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ ). Let Λ′′ = Λ ∩ R′′ . The inclusion Ep2n (R, Λ)θ 6 Sp2n (R, Λ) shows
that R′′ ⊆ R. Note that Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ )θ 6 Sp2n (R′′ , Λ′′ ) by the choice of R′′ .
Since R′′ is a finitely generated R′ -algebra, it is a finitely generated Z-algebra. By Lemma 4.5
R0′′ is a finitely generated Z-algebra. Therefore, it has finite Krull dimension and hence finite
Bass–Serre dimension. Thus by Theorem 2(5), the kth commutator subgroup D k Sp2n (R′′ , Λ′′ )
equals to Ep2n (R′′ , Λ′′ ) for some positive integer k. Now, since Ep2n (R′ , Λ′) is perfect, it is
equal to D k Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ ). It follows that
Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ )θ = D k Ep2n (R′ , Λ′ )θ 6 D k Sp2n (R′′ , Λ′′) = Ep2n (R′′ , Λ′′ ).
In particular, hθ ∈ Ep2n (R′′ , Λ′′ ) 6 Ep2n (R, Λ). Thus, Ep2n (R, Λ) is invariant under θ.
If θ is an automorphism of NA (R) this means that Ep2n (R, Λ) is a characteristic subgroup
of NA (R). If θ is an inner automorphism defined by g ∈ G(A), then the statement we proved
is the first assertion of the lemma.
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
9
The following straightforward corollary
shows that the normalizers of all subgroups of the
sandwich L Ep2n (R, Λ), NA (R, Λ) lie in that sandwich.
Corollary 4.7. For any H 6 NA (R, Λ) containing Ep2n (R, Λ) its normalizer is contained
in NA (R, Λ). In particular, the group NA (R, Λ) is self normalizing.
5. Inside a parabolic subgroup
Let H be a subgroup of Sp2n (A), normalized by Ep2n (K). Denote by (R, Λ) the form
ring, associated with H. In the proof of the following lemma we keep
Q using the ordering
on the index set I, defined in section 1. For example, the product −1
j=2 means that j =
2, . . . , n, −n, . . . , −1. We assume that the order of factors agrees with the ordering on I.
Lemma 5.1. If g ∈ U1 (R) and Ep2n (K)g ∈ H, then g ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ).
Q
Proof. Let g = −1
j=2 T1j (µj ). We have to prove that µj ∈ R for any j 6= −1 and µ−1 ∈ Λ.
Let h be the smallest element from I such that µj 6= 0. We proceed by going down induction
on h. If h = −1, then g consists of a single factor and there is nothing to prove. If h = −2,
then the result follows from Lemma 3.1.
Q
Now, let h 6 −2. Denote by i the successor of h in I. Then, [Th,i (−1), g] = T1,i (µh ) T1,j (ξh ).
j>i
By induction hypothesis µh ∈ R. The element T1h (−µh )g satisfies the conditions of the
lemma. Again by induction hypothesis it belongs to Ep2n (R, Λ). Thus, g ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ).
It is known that in a Chevalley group the unipotent radicals of two opposite standard
parabolic subgroups span the elementary group (see e. g. [18, Lemma 2.1]). The next lemma
shows that this holds for the parabolic subgroup P1 of Sp2n (R, Λ) as well.
Lemma 5.2. The set
{T1i (µ), Ti1 (µ), T±1 ∓1 (λ) | i 6= ±1, µ ∈ R, λ ∈ Λ}
generates the elementary group Ep2n (R, Λ).
Proof. If i 6= ±j, ±1 then Tij (µ) = [Ti1 (µ), T1j (1)]. On the other hand, for λ ∈ Λ we have
T−ii (λ) = [T−11 (µ), T1i (1)]T−i1 (−λ).
Lemma 5.3. Let H be a subgroup of Sp2n (A), containing Ep2n (K) and let (R, Λ) be a form
ring, associated with H. Suppose that g commutes with a long root subgroup Xγ (K) and
Ep2n (K)g ∈ H. Then g ∈ NA (R, Λ).
Proof. Without loss of generality we may assume that γ = 2ε1 is the maximal root. Then g
belongs to the standard parabolic subgroup P1 , corresponding to the simple root α1 = ε1 −ε2 ,
′
′
in other words, gi1 = g−1i = g−11 = 0 for all i 6= ±1. Moreover, g11 = g−1−1 = g11
= g−1−1
=
2
µ, where µ = 1. Then g = ab for some b ∈ U1 (A) and a ∈ L1 (A) (a and b are not
necessarily in H). For any d ∈ U1 (K) the element dg belongs to H ∩ U1 (A). By Lemma 5.1,
dg ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ). If d = T1i (1), then the above inclusion implies that µgij ∈ R for all
i 6= 1 and all j ∈ I. It follows that T1i (1)a and Ti1 (1)a belong to Ep2n (R, Λ). On the other
hand, a commutes with root subgroups X±γ (K). By the previous lemma we conclude that a
normalizes Ep2n (R, Λ).
Now, we have Ep2n (K)b 6 Ep2n (R, Λ)g ∈ H and by Lemma 5.1 b ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ). Thus,
g ∈ NA (R, Λ) as required.
10
ANTHONY BAK AND ALEXEI STEPANOV
6. Proof of Theorem 1
In this section we assume that 2 = 0 in K. Let G be a Chevalley group with a not
simply laced root system, e. g. G = Sp2n . Recall that in this case a short root unipotent
element h is called a small unipotent element, see [11]. The terminology reflects the fact that
the conjugacy class of h is small. In our settings a small unipotent element is conjugate to
Tij (µ), where i 6= ±j and µ ∈ R.
The following lemma was obtained over a field by Golubchik and Mikhalev in [10], Gordeev
in [11] and Nesterov and Stepanov in [13].
Lemma 6.1. Let Φ = Bn , Cn , F4 and let R be a ring such that 2 = 0. Let α be a long root
g
and g ∈ G(Φ, R). If h ∈ G(R) is a small unipotent element, then Xα (R)h commutes with
Xα (R).
g
Proof. The identity with constants [Xα (R)h , Xα (R)] = {1} is inherited by subrings and
quotient rings. Any commutative ring with 2 = 0 is a quotient of a polynomial ring over F2
which is a subring of a field of characteristic 2.
The next lemma is the last ingredient for the proof of Theorem 1. It follows from the
normal structure of the general unitary group GU2n (R, Λ) obtained by Bak and Vavilov at
the middle of 1990-s. Since this result has not been published yet, we give a prove of a very
simple special case of it.
Lemma 6.2. A normal subgroup N of Ep2n (R, Λ), containing a root element Tij (1), coincides with Ep2n (R, Λ).
Proof. First, suppose that i 6= ±j. Take k 6= ±i, ±j. Then, [Tij (1), Tjk (ξ)] = Tik (µ) ∈ N.
Since the Weyl group acts transitively on the set of all short roots, we have Tlm (µ) ∈ N for
all l 6= ±m and µ ∈ R. Further,
Tl,−m (−λ)[Tlm (1), Tm,−m (λ)] = Tl,−l (λ) ∈ N
for all λ ∈ Λ and l ∈ I.
Now, let i = m, j = −m and l 6= ±m. Put λ = 1 in the latter commutator identity.
Then, Tl,−m (1)Tl,−l (1) ∈ N. By transitivity of the Weyl group we know that Tl,−l (1) ∈ N,
therefore Tl,−m (1) ∈ N. By the first paragraph of the proof, N contains all the generators of
Ep2n (R, Λ).
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 1. The idea of the proof is the same as for the main
result of [17].
Proof of Theorem 1. Let (R, Λ) be the form subring associated with H. Put h = T12 (1) and
x = T1,−1 (λ), where λ ∈ Λ. Take two arbitrary elements a, b from Ep2n (R, Λ) and consider
agb
the element c = xh ∈ H. By Lemma 6.1 this element commutes with a long root subgroup
and by Lemma 5.3 c ∈ NA (R). Rewrite c in the form
b
c = g −1 (a−1 h−1 a)g(bxb−1 )g −1(a−1 ha)g
Since b ∈ Ep2n (R, Λ), the element bcb−1 is in NA (R). Fix a and let b and λ vary. The
subgroup generated by bxb−1 is normal in Ep2n (R, Λ). By Lemma 6.2 it must coincide with
−1 −1 −1
Ep2n (R, Λ). Thus, Ep2n (R, Λ)g (a h a)g ∈ NA (R), and by Lemma 4.6 (a−1 h−1 a)g ∈ NA (R).
Again, elements of the form a−1 h−1 a, as a ranges over Ep2n (R, Λ), generate a normal
subgroup in Ep2n (R, Λ). The minimal normal subgroup of Ep2n (R, Λ) containing h must be
equal to Ep2n (R, Λ) by Lemma 6.2. Therefore, Ep2n (R, Λ)g ∈ NA (R). By Lemma 4.6 one
has g ∈ NA (R), which completes the proof.
SUBRING SUBGROUPS IN SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2
11
References
[1] E. Abe, Normal subgroups of Chevalley groups over commutative rings, Contemp. Math.
83 (1989), 1–17.
[2] E. Abe and K. Suzuki, On normal subgroups of Chevalley groups over commutative rings,
Tohoku Math. J. 28 (1976), no. 2, 185–198.
[3] A. Bak, The stable structure of quadratic modules, Ph.D. thesis, Columbia Univ.,
Columbia, USA, 1969.
, Odd dimension surgery groups of odd torsion groups vanish, Topology 14 (1975),
[4]
no. 4, 367–374.
, K-theory of forms, Ann. of Math. Stud. 98, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
[5]
N.J., 1981.
, Nonabelian K-theory: The nilpotent class of K1 and general stability, K-Theory
[6]
4 (1991), 363–397.
[7] A. Bak and N. A. Vavilov, Normality for elementary subgroup functors, Math. Proc.
Cambridge Philos. Soc. 118 (1995), no. 1, 35–47.
[8]
, Structure of hyperbolic unitary groups I: Elementary subgroups, Algebra Colloq
7 (2000), no. 2, 159–196.
[9] N. Bourbaki, Elements of mathematics. Lie groups and Lie algebras. Chapters 4-6,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 2008.
[10] I. Z. Golubchik and A. V. Mikhalev, Generalized group identities is classical groups, J.
Soviet Math. 27 (1984), no. 4, 2902–2918.
[11] N. L. Gordeev, Freedom in conjugacy classes of simple algebraic groups and identities
with constants, St.Petersburg Math. J. 9 (1998), no. 4, 709–723.
[12] R. Hazrat, Dimension theory and nonstable K1 of quadratic modules, K-Theory 27
(2002), no. 4, 293–328.
[13] V. V. Nesterov and A. V. Stepanov, Identity with constant in a Chevalley group of type
F4 , St.Petersburg Math. J. 21 (2010), no. 5, 819–823.
[14] Ya. N. Nuzhin, Groups contained between groups of Lie type over different fields, Algebra
Logic 22 (1983), 378–389.
, Intermediate subgroups in the Chevalley groups of type Bl , Cl , F4 , and G2 over
[15]
the nonperfect fields of characteristic 2 and 3, Sib. Math. J. 54 (2013), no. 1, 119–123.
[16] R. G. Steinberg, Lectures on Chevalley groups, Dept. of Mathematics, Yale University,
1968.
[17] A. V. Stepanov, Subring subgroups in Chevalley groups with doubly laced root systems,
J. Algebra 362 (2012), 12–29.
[18] A. V. Stepanov, Elementary calculus in Chevalley groups over rings, J. Prime Research
in Math. 9 (2013), 79–95.
Bielefeld University, Postfach 100131, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
St.Petersburg State University
and
St.Petersburg Electrotechnical University
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
Joint Modelling of Location, Scale and Skewness Parameters of the Skew
Laplace Normal Distribution
Fatma Zehra Doğru1* and Olcay Arslan2
1
Giresun University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Econometrics, 28100
Giresun/Turkey
[email protected]
2
Ankara University, Faculty of Science, Department of Statistics, 06100 Ankara/Turkey
[email protected]
Abstract
In this article, we propose joint location, scale and skewness models of the skew Laplace normal (SLN)
distribution as an alternative model for joint modelling location, scale and skewness models of the skewt-normal (STN) distribution when the data set contains both asymmetric and heavy-tailed observations.
We obtain the maximum likelihood (ML) estimators for the parameters of the joint location, scale and
skewness models of the SLN distribution using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. The
performance of the proposed model is demonstrated by a simulation study and a real data example.
Keywords: EM algorithm, joint location, scale and skewness models, ML, SLN, SN.
1. Introduction
There are many remarkable and tractable methods for modeling the mean. In practice, modelling the
dispersion will be of direct interest in its own right, to identify the sources of variability in the
observations (Smyth and Verbyla (1999)).
In recent years, joint mean and dispersion models have been used for modeling heteroscedastic data
sets. For instance, Park (1966) proposed a log linear model for the variance parameter and described the
Gaussian model using a two stage process to estimate the parameters. Harvey (1976) examined the
maximum likelihood (ML) estimation of the location and scale effects and also proposed a likelihood
ratio test for heteroscedasticity. Aitkin (1987) proposed the modelling of variance heterogeneity in
normal regression analysis. Verbyla (1993) estimated the parameters of the normal regression model
under the log linear dependence of the variances on explanatory variables using the restricted ML. Engel
and Huele (1996) represented an extension of the response surface approach to Taguchi type
experiments for robust design by accommodating generalized linear modeling. Taylor and Verbyla
(2004) introduced joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution. Lin and Wang
(2009) proposed a robust approach for joint modelling of mean and scale parameters for longitudinal
data. Lin and Wang (2011) studied Bayesian inference for joint modelling of location and scale
parameters of the t distribution for longitudinal data. Wu and Li (2012) explored the variable selection
for joint mean and dispersion models of the inverse Gaussian distribution. Li and Wu (2014) proposed
joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the skew normal (SN) (Azzalini (1985, 1986))
distribution. Zhao and Zhang (2015) proposed variable selection of varying dispersion student-t
regression models. Recently, Li et al. (2017) proposed variable selection in joint location, scale and
skewness models of the SN distribution and Wu et al. (2017) explored variable selection in joint location,
scale and skewness models of the STN distribution.
The skew exponential power distribution was proposed by Azzalini (1986) to deal with both
skewness and heavy-tailedness, simultaneously. Its properties and inferential aspects were studied by
DiCiccio and Monti (2004). Gómez et al. (2007) studied the skew Laplace normal (SLN) distribution
that is a special case of the skew exponential power distribution. This distribution has wider range of
skewness and also more applicable than the SN distribution. In literature, skewness and heavy-tailedness
are modelled by using STN distribution for joint location, scale and skewness models. However, the
1
STN distribution has an extra parameter that is the degrees of freedom parameter. Since this parameter
should be estimated along with the other parameters, it may be computationally more exhaustive in
practice. Therefore, in this paper, we propose to model joint location, scale and skewness models of the
SLN distribution as an alternative model for the joint location, scale and skewness models of the STN
distribution to model both skewness and heavy-tailedness in the data.
The rest of the paper is designed as follows. In Section 2, we give some properties of the SLN
distribution. In Section 3, we introduce joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN
distribution. In Section 4, we give the ML estimation of the proposed joint location, scale and skewness
model using the EM algorithm. In Section 5, we provide a simulation study to show the performance of
the proposed model. In Section 6, modeling applicability of the proposed model is illustrated by using
a real data set. The paper is finalized with a conclusion section.
2. Skew Laplace normal distribution
Let 𝑌 be a SLN distributed random variable (𝑌 ∼ 𝑆𝐿𝑁(𝜇, 𝜎 2 , 𝜆)) with the location parameter 𝜇 ∈ ℝ,
scale parameter 𝜎 2 ∈ (0, ∞) and the skewness parameter 𝜆 ∈ ℝ. The probability density function (pdf)
of 𝑌 is given as
𝑓(𝑦) = 2𝑓𝐿 (𝑦; 𝜇, 𝜎)Φ (𝜆
𝑦−𝜇
),
𝜎
(1)
where 𝑓𝐿 (𝑦; 𝜇, 𝜎) represents the pdf of Laplace distribution with
𝑓𝐿 (𝑦; 𝜇, 𝜎) =
1 −|𝑦−𝜇|
𝑒 𝜎
2𝜎
and Φ is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. Figure 1 displays the
plots of the pdf of the SLN distribution for 𝜇 = 0, 𝜎 = 1 and different values of 𝜆.
Figure 1. Examples of the SLN pdf for 𝜇 = 0, 𝜎 = 1 and different skewness parameter values of 𝜆.
Let the random variables 𝑍 ∼ 𝑆𝑁(0,1, 𝜆) and 𝑉 with the pdf 𝑓𝑉 (𝑣) = 𝑣 −3 exp(−(2𝑣 2 )−1 ), 𝑣 > 0 be
two independent random variables. Then, the random variable 𝑌 ∼ 𝑆𝐿𝑁(𝜇, 𝜎 2 , 𝜆) has the following
scale mixture form
2
𝑌 =𝜇+𝜎
𝑍
.
𝑉
(2)
Further, using the stochastic representation of the SN (Azzalini (1986, p. 201) and Henze (1986,
Theorem 1)) distributed random variable 𝑍, the stochastic representation of the random variable 𝑌 is
obtained as
𝑌 = 𝜇 +𝜎(
𝜆|𝑍1 |
√𝑉 2 (𝑉 2 + 𝜆2 )
+
𝑍2
√𝑉 2
+ 𝜆2
(3)
),
where 𝑍1 ∼ 𝑁(0,1) and 𝑍2 ∼ 𝑁(0,1) are independent random variables. This stochastic representation
will give the following hierarchical representation of the SLN distribution. Let 𝑈 =
√𝑉 −2 (𝑉 2 + 𝜆2 )|𝑍1 |. Then,
𝜎𝜆𝑢
𝜎2
,
),
𝑣 2 + 𝜆2 𝑣 2 + 𝜆2
𝑣 2 + 𝜆2
𝑈|𝑣 ∼ 𝑇𝑁 ((0,
) ; (0, ∞)) ,
𝑣2
𝑉 ∼ 𝑓𝑉 (𝑣) = 𝑣 −3 exp(−(2𝑣 2 )−1 ),
𝑌|𝑢, 𝑣 ∼ 𝑁 (𝜇 +
(4)
where 𝑇𝑁(∙) shows the truncated normal distribution. The hierarchical representation will allow us to
carry on the parameter estimation using the EM algorithm. Using this hierarchical representation the
joint pdf of 𝑌, 𝑈 and 𝑉 can be written as
2
1 −2
1 𝑣 2 (𝑦 − 𝜇)2
𝜆(𝑦 − 𝜇)
2 )−1 )
𝑓(𝑦, 𝑢, 𝑣) =
𝑣 exp(−(2𝑣
exp {− (
+
−
(𝑢
) )}.
𝜋𝜎
2
𝜎2
𝜎
(5)
Next we will turn our attention to the conditional distribution of 𝑈 given 𝑌 and 𝑉. Taking the integral
of (5) over 𝑈, we obtain the joint pdf of 𝑌 and 𝑉 as
2 1⁄2 −2
𝑣 2𝑠2
𝑓(𝑦, 𝑣) = ( 2 ) 𝑣 exp (−(2𝑣 2 )−1 −
) Φ(𝜆𝑠) ,
𝜋𝜎
2
(6)
where 𝑠 = (𝑦 − 𝜇)⁄𝜎. Then, dividing (5) by (6) yields the following conditional density function of 𝑈
given the others
𝑓(𝑢|𝑦, 𝑣) =
1
√2𝜋
exp {−
(𝑢 − 𝜆𝑠)2
} Φ(𝜆𝑠).
2
(7)
It is clear from the density given in (7) that 𝑈 and 𝑉 are conditionally independent. Therefore, the
distribution of 𝑈|𝑌 = 𝑦 is
𝑈|𝑌 = 𝑦 ∼ 𝑇𝑁((𝜆𝑠, 1); (0, ∞)).
(8)
Further, after dividing (6) by (1), we get the following conditional density function of 𝑉 given 𝑌
2
𝑣 2 𝑠 2 |𝑦 − 𝜇|
𝑓(𝑣|𝑦) = √ 𝑣 −2 exp {−(2𝑣 2 )−1 −
+
}.
𝜋
2
𝜎
3
(9)
Now, we are ready to give the following proposition. The proof of this proposition can be easily done
using the conditional pdfs given above.
Proposition 1. Using the hierarchical representation given in (4), we have the following conditional
expectations
𝜎
,
|𝑦 − 𝜇|
Φ(𝜆𝑠)
𝐸(𝑈|𝑦) = 𝜆𝑠 +
,
𝜙(𝜆𝑠)
𝐸(𝑈 2 |𝑦) = 1 + 𝜆𝑠𝐸(𝑈|𝑦) .
(10)
𝐸(𝑉 2 |𝑦) =
(11)
(12)
Note that these conditional expectations will be used in the EM algorithm given in Section 4.
3. Joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN distribution
In this study, we consider the following joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN
distribution
𝑦𝑖 ∼ 𝑆𝐿𝑁(𝜇𝑖 , 𝜎𝑖2 , 𝜆𝑖 ), 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛
𝜇𝑖 = 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷 ,
log 𝜎𝑖2 = 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 ,
𝑇
{ 𝜆𝑖 = 𝒘 𝑖 𝜶 ,
(13)
𝑇
𝑇
where 𝑦𝑖 is the 𝑖𝑡ℎ observed response, 𝒙𝑖 = (𝑥𝑖1 , … , 𝑥𝑖𝑝 ) , 𝒛𝑖 = (𝑧𝑖1 , … , 𝑧𝑖𝑞 ) and 𝒘𝑖 = (𝑤𝑖1 , … , 𝑤𝑖𝑟 )𝑇
𝑇
are observed covariates corresponding to 𝑦𝑖 , 𝜷 = (𝛽1 , … , 𝛽𝑝 ) is a 𝑝 × 1 vector of unknown parameters
𝑇
in the location model, and 𝜸 = (𝛾1 , … , 𝛾𝑞 ) is a 𝑞 × 1 vector of unknown parameters in the scale model
and 𝜶 = (𝛼1 , … , 𝛼𝑟 )𝑇 is a 𝑟 × 1 vector of unknown parameters in the skewness model. These covariate
vectors 𝒙𝑖 , 𝒛𝑖 and 𝒘𝑖 are not needed to be identical.
4. ML estimation of joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN distribution
Let (𝑦𝑖 , 𝒙𝑖 , 𝒛𝑖 ), 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛, be a random sample from model given in (13). Let 𝜽 = (𝜷, 𝜸, 𝜶). Then,
the log-likelihood function of 𝜽 based on the observed data is written as
𝑛
𝑛
𝑛
1
|𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷|
ℓ(𝜽) = − ∑ 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 − ∑
+ ∑ log Φ(𝜅𝑖 ),
𝑇
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑖=1
where 𝜅𝑖 = 𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
(𝑦𝑖 −𝒙𝑇
𝑖 𝜷)
𝑇 ⁄
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸 2
𝑖=1
(14)
𝑖=1
. The ML estimator of 𝜽 can be found by maximizing the equation (14). We
can see that the direct maximization of this function does not seem very tractable, so numerical
algorithms may be needed to approximate the possible maximizer of this function. Since, the SLN
distribution has a scale mixture form, the EM algorithm (Dempster et al. (1977)) can be implemented
to obtain the ML estimator for 𝜽. To simplify the steps of the EM algorithm, we will use the stochastic
representation of the SLN distribution given in (3).
4
Let 𝑉 and 𝑈 be the latent variables. Using the hierarchical representation given in (4), or the model
(13) we get the following hierarchical representation
𝑇
𝑌𝑖 |𝑢𝑖 , 𝑣𝑖 ∼
𝑁 (𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷 +
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2 (𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)𝑢𝑖
2
𝑣𝑖2 + (𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
𝑇
,
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2) ,
𝑣𝑖2 + (𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
2
𝑣𝑖2 + (𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
𝑈𝑖 |𝑣𝑖 = 1 ∼ 𝑇𝑁 ((0,
) ; (0, ∞)) ,
𝑣𝑖2
−1
(15)
𝑣𝑖 ∼ 𝑓(𝑣𝑖 ) = 𝑣𝑖−3 exp (−(2𝑣𝑖2 ) ).
Let 𝒖 = (𝑢1 , … , 𝑢𝑛 ) and 𝒗 = (𝑣1 , … , 𝑣𝑛 ) be the missing data and (𝒚, 𝒖, 𝒗) be the complete data, where
𝒚 = (𝑦1 , … , 𝑦𝑛 ). Then, using the hierarchical representation given in (15), the complete data loglikelihood function of 𝜽 can be written as
𝑛
2
1
1 (𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 2
−1
ℓ𝑐 (𝛉; 𝒚, 𝒖, 𝒗) = ∑ {− log 𝜋 − 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 − 2 log 𝑣𝑖 − (2𝑣𝑖2 ) − (
𝑣𝑖
𝑇
2
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑖=1
+𝑢𝑖2
−2
2
𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
(𝑦𝑖 −
𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝑢𝑖
+
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2
(16)
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) )}.
To obtain the ML estimator of 𝜽, we have to maximize (16). However, the estimators obtained from this
maximization will be dependent on the latent variables. Thus, to handle this latency problem, we have
to take the conditional expectation of the complete data log-likelihood function given the observed data
𝑦𝑖
𝑛
1
−1
𝐸(ℓ𝑐 (𝛉; 𝒚, 𝒖, 𝒗)|𝑦𝑖 ) = ∑ {− log 𝜋 − 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 − 2𝐸(log 𝑉𝑖 |𝑦𝑖 ) − 𝐸 ((2𝑉𝑖2 ) | 𝑦𝑖 )
2
𝑖=1
2
1 (𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)
− (
𝐸(𝑉𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 ) + 𝐸(𝑈𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 )
𝑇𝜸
𝒛
2
𝑒 𝑖
−2
𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
2
(𝑦𝑖 −
𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝐸(𝑈𝑖 |𝑦𝑖 )
+
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) )}.
(17)
The conditional expectations 𝐸(𝑉𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 ), 𝐸(𝑈𝑖 |𝑦𝑖 ) and 𝐸(𝑈𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 ) in (17) can be calculated using the
conditional expectations given in (10)-(12). Note that since the other conditional expectations are not
related to the parameters, we do not calculate them. Let
𝑇
𝑣̂𝑖 =
𝐸(𝑉𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 )
=
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸̂⁄2
|𝑦𝑖 −
̂|
𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷
(18)
,
Φ(𝜅̂ 𝑖 )
,
𝜙(𝜅̂ 𝑖 )
= 𝐸(𝑈𝑖2 |𝑦) = 1 + 𝜅̂ 𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖 ,
𝑢̂1𝑖 = 𝐸(𝑈𝑖 |𝑦𝑖 ) = 𝜅̂ 𝑖 +
(19)
𝑢̂2𝑖
(20)
̂
where, 𝜅̂ 𝑖 = 𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
̂
(𝑦𝑖 −𝒙𝑇
𝑖 𝜷)
𝑇 ̂⁄
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸 2
. Then, using these conditional expectations in (17) we get the following
objective function to be maximized with respect to 𝜽
5
𝑛
2
1
1 (𝑦 − 𝒙𝑇 𝜷)
̂ ) = ∑ {− log 𝜋 − 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 − ( 𝑖 𝑇 𝑖
𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝑣̂𝑖 + 𝑢̂2𝑖
2
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑖=1
−2
2
𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
(𝑦𝑖 −
𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝑢̂1𝑖
+
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) )}.
(21)
Now, the steps of the EM algorithm will be as follows:
EM algorithm:
1. Take initial value for 𝜽(0) = (𝜷(0) , 𝜸(0) , 𝜶(0) ).
2. E-Step: Given the observed data and the current parameter values, find the conditional expectation
of the complete data log-likelihood function given in (16). This corresponds to calculating the
conditional expectations given in (18)-(20). This step will be carried on as follows. Compute the
following conditional expectations for the 𝑘 = 0,1,2, … iteration
𝑣̂𝑖
(𝑘)
=
̂ (𝑘) )
𝐸(𝑉𝑖2 |𝑦𝑖 , 𝜽
𝑇 (𝑘) ⁄
2
=
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸̂
̂ (𝑘) |
|𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷
(22)
,
(𝑘)
(𝑘)
𝑢̂1𝑖
̂ (𝑘)
= 𝐸(𝑈𝑖 |𝑦𝑖 , 𝜽
)=
(𝑘)
𝜅̂ 𝑖
(𝑘)
̂ (𝑘) ) = 1
𝑢̂2𝑖 = 𝐸(𝑈 2 |𝑦, 𝜽
(𝑘)
where, 𝜅̂ 𝑖
̂ (𝑘)
= 𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶
+
Φ (𝜅̂ 𝑖 )
,
(𝑘)
𝜙 (𝜅̂ 𝑖 )
(𝑘) (𝑘)
+ 𝜅̂ 𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖 ,
(23)
(24)
̂ (𝑘) )
(𝑦𝑖 −𝒙𝑇
𝑖𝜷
𝑇 ̂(𝑘) ⁄2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
.
̂ ) and maximize it with respect to 𝜽 to obtain
3. M-Step: Use these conditional expectations in 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
new estimates. This maximization step yields the following formulation to update the new estimates.
The (𝑘 + 1)𝑡ℎ parameter estimates can be computed using
−1
̂ (𝑘+1) = 𝜽
̂ (𝑘) + (−𝐻(𝜽
̂ (𝑘) ))
𝜽
where 𝐺(𝜽) =
̂)
𝜕𝑄(𝜽;𝜽
and 𝐻(𝜽) =
𝜕𝜽
̂ (𝑘) ),
𝐺(𝜽
̂)
𝜕2 𝑄(𝜽;𝜽
𝜕𝜽𝜕𝜽𝑇
(25)
.
4. Repeat E and M steps until the convergence is satisfied.
Remark. For the detail expressions of 𝐺(𝜽) and 𝐻(𝜽) see Appendix.
5. Simulation study
In this section, we give a simulation study to show the performance of the proposed location, scale and
skewness models of the SLN distribution in terms of mean squared error (MSE). The MSE is given with
the following formula
𝑁
̂ (𝜃̂) =
𝑀𝑆𝐸
1
2
∑(𝜃̂𝑗 − 𝜃) ,
𝑁
𝑗=1
6
where 𝜃 is the true parameter value, 𝜃̂𝑗 is the estimate of 𝜃 for the 𝑗𝑡ℎ simulated data and 𝜃̅ =
1 𝑁
∑ 𝜃̂ .
𝑁 𝑗=1 𝑗
All simulation studies are conducted as 𝑁 = 1000 times. We set the sample sizes as 50, 100, 150 and
200. Note that the simulation study and real data example are performed using MATLAB R2015b. For
all numerical calculations, the convergence rule is taken as 10−6.
The data are generated from the following location, scale and skewness models of the SLN
distribution
𝑦𝑖 ∼ 𝑆𝐿𝑁(𝜇𝑖 , 𝜎𝑖2 , 𝜆), 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑛
𝜇𝑖 = 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷 ,
log 𝜎𝑖2 = 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝜸 ,
𝑇
{ 𝜆𝑖 = 𝒘𝑖 𝜶.
Here, all covariate vectors 𝒙𝑖 , 𝒛𝑖 and 𝒘𝑖 are independently generated from uniform distribution
𝑈(−1,1). To carry out the simulation study, we take the following two cases for true parameter values:
Case I: 𝛽0 = (0, −1, −1)𝑇 , 𝛾0 = (0, −1, −1)𝑇 and 𝛼0 = (0, −1, −1)𝑇 ,
Case II: 𝛽0 = (0,1,1)𝑇 , 𝛾0 = (0,1,1)𝑇 and 𝛼0 = (0,1,1)𝑇 ,
Case III: 𝛽0 = (1,1,0,0,1)𝑇 , 𝛾0 = (0.7,0.7,0,0,0.7)𝑇 and 𝛼0 = (0.5,0.5,0,0,0.5)𝑇 .
The simulation results are summarized in Tables 1, 2 and 3. These tables include the mean of the
estimators and the values of MSE. From these tables, we observe the followings. The proposed EM
algorithm is working accurately for estimating the parameters. When the sample sizes increase, the
values of MSE decrease.
Table 1. Mean of the estimators and the values of MSE for the different sample sizes for the Case I.
Model
Location Model
Scale Model
Skewness Model
𝑛
𝛽0
𝛽1
𝛽2
𝛾0
𝛾1
𝛾2
𝛼0
𝛼1
𝛼2
50
Mean
MSE
0.0010
0.0433
-1.0068
0.0624
-0.9950
0.0643
-0.0655
0.0905
-1.0595
0.3300
-1.1024
0.3445
-0.0527
0.5398
-1.5780
1.7814
-1.6140
2.0557
100
Mean
0.0020
-0.9983
-0.9987
-0.0384
-1.0576
-1.0281
0.0035
-1.1981
-1.2066
MSE
0.0161
0.0243
0.0256
0.0369
0.1376
0.1272
0.0600
0.2234
0.2339
150
Mean
-0.0002
-0.9987
-1.0077
-0.0278
-1.0264
-1.0118
-0.0034
-1.1213
-1.1157
MSE
0.0088
0.0143
0.0150
0.0228
0.0829
0.0843
0.0296
0.1113
0.1141
200
Mean
-0.0006
-0.9965
-0.9987
-0.0223
-1.0088
-1.0060
-0.0016
-1.0852
-1.0754
MSE
0.0061
0.0109
0.0117
0.0161
0.0594
0.0629
0.0190
0.0727
0.0652
Table 2. Mean of the estimators and the values of MSE for the different sample sizes for the Case II.
Model
Location Model
Scale Model
Skewness Model
𝑛
𝛽0
𝛽1
𝛽2
𝛾0
𝛾1
𝛾2
𝛼0
𝛼1
𝛼2
50
Mean
0.0059
1.0046
1.0036
-0.0794
1.0957
1.0562
-0.0130
1.5993
1.5928
MSE
0.0417
0.0623
0.0661
0.0935
0.3421
0.3332
0.4643
1.9956
1.7924
100
Mean
0.0035
1.0040
1.0095
-0.0369
1.0380
1.0357
0.0045
1.2105
1.2117
7
150
MSE
0.0142
0.0247
0.0265
0.0346
0.1282
0.1252
0.0635
0.2636
0.2621
Mean
-0.0020
0.9956
1.0085
-0.0209
1.0281
1.0193
-0.0009
1.1210
1.1148
200
MSE
0.0088
0.0158
0.0138
0.0224
0.0796
0.0783
0.0285
0.1035
0.1075
Mean
0.0018
1.0034
1.0036
-0.0239
1.0200
1.0130
-0.0013
1.0717
1.0802
MSE
0.0067
0.0115
0.0105
0.0162
0.0600
0.0580
0.0203
0.0672
0.0705
Table 3. Mean of the estimators and the values of MSE for the different sample sizes for the Case III.
Model
Location Model
Scale Model
Skewness Model
𝑛
𝛽0
𝛽1
𝛽2
𝛽3
𝛽4
𝛾0
𝛾1
𝛾2
𝛾3
𝛾4
𝛼0
𝛼1
𝛼2
𝛼3
𝛼4
50
Mean
1.0035
1.0018
0.0117
-0.0151
0.9971
0.5812
0.8583
-0.0148
-0.0303
0.8151
1.3635
1.2163
0.0499
-0.0369
1.3361
100
MSE
0.1734
0.2093
0.2129
0.2219
0.2102
0.1404
0.5997
0.6155
0.5936
0.5718
3.2188
3.1849
1.8253
1.6726
3.4589
Mean
0.9631
1.0057
-0.0181
-0.0006
1.0053
0.6667
0.7411
-0.0024
-0.0136
0.7538
0.7983
0.7769
0.0156
-0.0245
0.7471
150
MSE
0.0900
0.0709
0.0806
0.0784
0.0767
0.0598
0.1412
0.1715
0.1621
0.1561
0.4941
0.4341
0.1861
0.2151
0.3766
Mean
0.9596
0.9966
0.0045
0.0037
0.9958
0.6913
0.7145
0.0170
-0.0168
0.7044
0.6819
0.6210
-0.0059
-0.0103
0.6317
200
MSE
0.0508
0.0415
0.0473
0.0447
0.0372
0.0387
0.0955
0.0963
0.0951
0.0920
0.1866
0.1381
0.0807
0.0764
0.1347
Mean
0.9808
1.0012
0.0091
-0.0095
1.0081
0.6792
0.7226
-0.0147
-0.0110
0.7309
0.6067
0.5894
0.0033
-0.0041
0.5827
MSE
0.0356
0.0296
0.0294
0.0301
0.0287
0.0240
0.0685
0.0612
0.0665
0.0621
0.0975
0.0831
0.0420
0.0499
0.0608
6. Real data example
The Martin Marietta data set includes the relationship of the excess rate of returns of the Marietta
Company and an index for the excess rate of return for the New York Exchange (CRSP). These rate of
returns for the company and the CRSP index were determined monthly over a period of five years. This
data set used by Butler et al. (1990) for modelling a simple linear regression with Gaussian errors.
Azzalini and Capitanio (2003) analyzed this data set for modelling the linear regression model when the
errors have the skew t distribution. Also, Taylor and Verbyla (2004) examined this data set for joint
modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution. We display the scatter plot of the data
set and the histogram of the Martin Marietta excess returns. Since the skewness coefficient of Martin
Marietta excess returns is 2.9537 and also according to the Figure 2 (b), we can say that it will be more
suitable to model this data set with a joint location, scale and skewness models of a skew distribution.
Figure 2. (a) Scatter plot of the data set. (b) Histogram of the Martin Marietta excess returns.
In this article, we analyze this data set to illustrate the applicability of the joint location, scale and
skewness models of SLN distribution over the joint location, scale and skewness models of the STN
distribution. For the comparison of the models, we use the values of the Akaike information criterion
8
(AIC) (Akaike (1973)), the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Schwarz (1978)), and the efficient
determination criterion (EDC) (Bai et al. (1989)). These criteria have the following form
̂) + 𝑚𝑐𝑛 ,
−2ℓ(𝛉
where ℓ(∙) represents the maximized log-likelihood, 𝑚 is the number of free parameters to be estimated
in the model and 𝑐𝑛 is the penalty term. Here, we take 𝑐𝑛 = 2 for AIC, 𝑐𝑛 = log(𝑛) for BIC and 𝑐𝑛 =
0.2√𝑛 for EDC.
We give the estimation results in Table 4 for all models. This table contains the estimates, bootstrap
standard errors (BSEs) (Efron and Tibshirani (1993)) of estimates based on 500 random samples, the
log-likelihood, and the values of AIC, BIC, and EDC. Note that we take the heteroscedastic t model
results given in Taylor and Verbyla (2004) as initial values for the parameters of location and scale
models. Also, we set 𝛼0 = 𝛼1 = 0 as initial values for the parameters of skewness model and the degrees
of freedom parameter 3.75. In Figure 3, we show the scatter plot of the data set with the fitted regression
lines obtained from the joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN distribution and the joint
location, scale and skewness models of the STN distribution. We observe that the joint location, scale
and skewness models of the SLN distribution has better fit than the location, scale and skewness models
of the STN distribution according to the information criteria and also Figure 3.
Table 4. Estimation results for Martin Marietta data set.
Location model
Scale model
Skewness model
Information Criteria
𝛽0
𝛽1
𝛾0
𝛾1
𝛼0
𝛼1
̂)
ℓ(𝛉
AIC
BIC
EDC
Skew t Normal
Estimate
BSE
0.0289
-0.0349
1.1387
0.4888
0.4418
-5.7905
15.8670
25.1552
1.6808
0.5614
33.9531
19.3303
75.9986
-139.9872
-125.3268
-118.3268
9
Skew Laplace Normal
Estimate
BSE
0.0227
-0.0267
0.3683
0.7344
0.3234
-5.8282
11.8023
17.2765
1.0923
0.4040
9.0474
13.3093
76.9986
-139.9971
-127.4311
-121.4311
Figure 3. The scatterplot of the data set with the fitted regression lines obtained from joint location,
scale and skewness models of the SN and SLN distributions.
7. Conclusions
In this study, we have proposed the joint location, scale and skewness models of the SLN distribution
as an alternative to the joint location, scale and skewness models of the STN distribution. We have
obtained the ML estimates via the EM algorithm. We have provided a simulation study to show the
estimation performance of the proposed model. We have observed from simulation results that the
parameters can be accurately estimated. We have given a real data application to test the applicability
of the proposed model and also to compare with the joint, location, scale and skewness models of the
STN distribution. We have seen from real data example results that the joint location, scale and skewness
models of the SLN distribution gives better fit than the joint, location, scale and skewness models of the
STN distribution. Thus, we have concluded that the proposed model can be used as an alternative to the
the joint, location, scale and skewness models of the STN distribution for modelling the data sets which
have asymmetric and heavy-tailed outcomes.
References
Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Proceeding
of the Second International Symposium on Information Theory, B.N. Petrov and F. Caski, eds.,
267-281, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
Aitkin, M. 1987. Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM. Applied statistics,
332-339.
Azzalini, A. 1985. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scandinavian Journal of
Statistics, 12(2), 171-178.
Azzalini, A. 1986. Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Statistica,
46(2), 199-208.
Azzalini, A., Capitanio, A. 2003. Distributions generated by perturbation of symmetry with emphasis
on a multivariate skew t distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical
Methodology), 65(2), 367-389.
10
Bai, Z.D., Krishnaiah, P R., Zhao, L.C. 1989. On rates of convergence of efficient detection criteria in
signal processing with white noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 35, 380-388.
DiCiccio, T.J., Monti, A.C. 2004. Inferential aspects of the skew exponential power distribution. Journal
of the American Statistical Association, 99(466), 439-450.
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. NewYork: Chapman&Hall.
Engel, J., Huele, A.F. 1996. A generalized linear modeling approach to robust design. Technometrics,
38(4), 365-373.
Gómez, H.W., Venegas, O., Bolfarine, H. 2007. Skew-symmetric distributions generated by the
distribution function of the normal distribution. Environmetrics, 18, 395-407.
Harvey, A.C. 1976. Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Econometrica:
Journal of the Econometric Society, 44(3), 461-465.
Li, H.Q., Wu, L.C. 2014. Joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the skew-normal
distribution. Applied Mathematics-A Journal of Chinese Universities, 29(3), 265-272.
Li, H., Wu, L., Ma, T. 2017. Variable selection in joint location, scale and skewness models of the skewnormal distribution, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 30(3), 694-709.
Lin, T.I., Wang, Y.J. 2009. A robust approach to joint modeling of mean and scale covariance for
longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 139(9), 3013-3026.
Lin, T.I., Wang, W.L. 2011. Bayesian inference in joint modelling of location and scale parameters of
the t distribution for longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 141(4), 15431553.
Park, R.E. 1966. Estimation with heteroscedastic error terms, Econometrica, 1966, 34, 888.
Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461-464.
Smyth, G.K., Verbyla, A.P. 1999. Adjusted likelihood methods for modelling dispersion in generalized
linear models. Environmetrics, 10(6), 695-709.
Taylor, J., Verbyla, A. 2004. Joint modelling of location and scale parameters of the t distribution.
Statistical Modelling, 4(2), 91-112.
Verbyla, A.P. 1993. Modelling variance heterogeneity: residual maximum likelihood and diagnostics.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 55(2), 493-508.
Wu, L., Li, H. 2012. Variable selection for joint mean and dispersion models of the inverse Gaussian
distribution. Metrika, 75(6), 795-808.
Wu, L., Tian, G. L., Zhang, Y. Q., Ma, T. 2017. Variable selection in joint location, scale and skewness
models with a skew-t-normal distribution. Statistics and Its Interface, 10(2), 217-227.
Zhao, W., Zhang, R. 2015. Variable selection of varying dispersion student-t regression models. Journal
of Systems Science and Complexity, 28(4), 961-977.
Appendix
Using the objective function given in (21), we obtain the score function
𝐺(𝜽) =
̂)
𝑇
𝜕𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
= (𝐺1𝑇 (𝜷), 𝐺2𝑇 (𝜸), 𝐺3𝑇 (𝜶)) ,
𝜕𝜽
where
𝑛
𝐺1 (𝜷) = ∑
𝑖=1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒙𝑖
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑛
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑖=1
𝑛
(𝑣̂𝑖 +
2
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶) ) −
∑
𝑖=1
2
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)𝒙𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
,
𝑛
1
1
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 𝒛𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒛𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
2
𝑇
𝐺2 (𝜸) = − ∑ 𝒛𝑖 + ∑
(𝑣
̂
+
𝜶)
)
−
∑
,
(𝒘
𝑖
𝑖
𝑇
𝑇
2
2
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑖=1
11
𝑛
𝐺3 (𝜶) = ∑
𝑛
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒘𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
−∑
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑖=1
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒘𝑖
𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑖=1
,
and observed Fisher information matrix
̂ ) 𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂ ) 𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜷𝑇
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜸𝑇
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜶𝑇
2
2
2
2
̂)
̂ ) 𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂ ) 𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝐻(𝜽) =
=
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜽𝜕𝜽
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜷
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜸
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜶
̂ ) 𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂ ) 𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝑇
𝑇
𝑇
[ 𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜷
𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜸
𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜶 ]
where
𝑛
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
2
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝒙𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)
= − ∑ 𝑇 𝑣̂𝑖 − ∑
𝒙𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖 ,
𝑇
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜷𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑛
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒙𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)𝒙𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
2
𝑇
=
−
∑
(𝑣
̂
+
𝜶)
)
+
∑
,
(𝒘
𝑖
𝑖
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜸𝑇
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
2
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑖=1
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝒙𝑖 𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒙𝑖 𝒘𝑇𝑖
=
−
∑
+
2
∑
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜷𝜕𝜶𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑛
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒛𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)𝒛𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
2
𝑇
= −∑
(𝑣̂𝑖 + (𝒘𝑖 𝜶) ) + ∑
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜷𝑇
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
2
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛
2
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
1
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 𝒛𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒛𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
2
𝑇
=
−
∑
(𝑣
̂
+
𝜶)
)
+
∑
,
(𝒘
𝑖
𝑖
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜸𝑇
2
4
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
2
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑛
𝑖=1
2
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒛𝑖 𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 𝒛𝑖 𝒘𝑇𝑖
=
−
∑
+
∑
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜸𝜕𝜶𝑇
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
𝒘𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒘𝑖 𝒙𝑇𝑖
= −∑
+ 2∑
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜷𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
𝑛
2
̂)
𝜕 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
1
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷)𝒘𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖 𝑢̂1𝑖
(𝒘𝑇𝑖 𝜶)(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 𝒘𝑖 𝒛𝑇𝑖
=− ∑
+∑
,
𝑇
𝑇
𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜸𝑇
2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸⁄2
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
2
𝑖=1
𝑛
𝑖=1
2
̂)
𝜕 2 𝑄(𝜽; 𝜽
(𝑦𝑖 − 𝒙𝑇𝑖 𝜷) 𝒘𝑖 𝒘𝑇𝑖
=
−
∑
.
𝑇
𝜕𝜶𝜕𝜶𝑇
𝑒 𝒛𝑖 𝜸
𝑖=1
12
| 10math.ST
|
1
Investigations of a Robotic Testbed with
Viscoelastic Liquid Cooled Actuators
arXiv:1711.01649v2 [cs.SY] 8 Mar 2018
Donghyun Kim, Junhyeok Ahn, Orion Campbell, Nicholas Paine, and Luis Sentis,
Abstract—We design, build, and thoroughly test a new type of
actuator dubbed viscoelastic liquid cooled actuator (VLCA) for
robotic applications. VLCAs excel in the following five critical
axes of performance: energy efficiency, torque density, impact
resistence, joint position and force controllability. We first study
the design objectives and choices of the VLCA to enhance the
performance on the needed criteria. We follow by an investigation
on viscoelastic materials in terms of their damping, viscous and
hysteresis properties as well as parameters related to the longterm performance. As part of the actuator design, we configure
a disturbance observer to provide high-fidelity force control
to enable a wide range of impedance control capabilities. We
proceed to design a robotic system capable to lift payloads of
32.5 kg, which is three times larger than its own weight. In
addition, we experiment with Cartesian trajectory control up to
2 Hz with a vertical range of motion of 32 cm while carrying a
payload of 10 kg. Finally, we perform experiments on impedance
control and mechanical robustness by studying the response of
the robotics testbed to hammering impacts and external force
interactions.
Index Terms—Viscoelastic liquid cooled actuator, Torque feedback control, Impedance control.
I. I NTRODUCTION
ERIES elastic actuators (SEAs) [1] have been extensively
used in robotics [2], [3] due to their impact resistance and
high-fidelity torque controllability. One drawback of SEAs is
the difficulty that arises when using a joint position controller
due to the presence of the elastic element in the drivetrain. To
remedy this problem the addition of dampers has been previously considered [4]–[6]. However, incorporating mechanical
dampers makes actuators bulky and increases their mechanical
complexity.
One way to avoid this complexity is to employ elastomers
instead of metal springs. Using a viscoelastic material instead
of combined spring-damper systems enables compactness [7]
and simplified drivetrains [8]. However, it is difficult to
achieve high bandwidth torque control due to the nonlinear
behavior of elastomers. To address this difficulty, [9] models
the force-displacement curve of elastomer using a “standard
linear model.” The estimated elastomer force is employed in
a closed-loop force controller. Unfortunately, the hysteresis in
the urethane elastomer destabilized the system at frequencies
above 2 Hz. In contrast our controllers achieve a bandwidth of
70 Hz. The study on [10] accomplishes reasonably good torque
control performance, but the range of torques is small to ensure
that the elastomer operates in the linear region; our design and
control methods described here achieve more than an order of
magnitude higher range of torques with high fidelity tracking.
To sufficiently address the nonlinear behavior of elastomers,
which severely reduce force control performance, we empiri-
S
cally analyze various viscoelastic materials with a custom-built
elastomer testbed. We measure each material’s linearity, creep,
compression set, and damping under preloaded conditions,
which is a study under-documented in the academic literature.
To achieve stable and accurate force control, we study various
feedback control schemes. In a previous work, we showed that
the active passivity obtained from motor velocity feedback
[11] and model-based control such as disturbance observer
(DOB) [12] play an essential role in achieving high-fidelity
force feedback control. Here, we analyze the phase margins
of various feedback controllers and empirically show their
operation in the new actuators. We verify the stability and
accuracy of our controllers by studying impedance control and
impact tests.
To test our new actuator, we have designed a two degree-offreedom (DOF), robotic testbed, shown in Fig. 5. It integrates
two of our new actuators, one in the ankle, and another in the
knee, while restricting motions to the sagittal plane. With the
foot bolted to the floor for initial tests, weight plates can be
loaded on the hip joint to serve as an end-effector payload.
We test operational space control to show stable and accurate
operational space impedance behaviors. We perform dynamic
motions with high payloads to showcase another important
aspect of our system, which is its cooling system aimed at
significantly increasing the power of the robot.
The torque density of electric motors is often limited by
sustainable core temperature. For this reason, the maximum
continuous torque achieved by these motors can be significantly enhanced using an effective cooling system. Our
previous study [13] analyzed the improvements on achievable
power based on thermal data of electric motors and proposed
metrics for design of cooling systems. Based on the metrics
from that study, we chose a 120 W Maxon EC-max 40, which
is expected to exert 3.59 times larger continuous torque when
using the proposed liquid cooling system. We demonstrate the
effectiveness of liquid cooling by exerting 860N continous
force during 5 min and 4500N peak force during 0.5s while
keeping the core temperatures below 115◦C, which is much
smaller than the maximum, 155◦C. We accurately track fast
motions of 2 Hz while carrying a 10 kg payload for endurance
tests. In addition we perform heavy lift tests with a payload
of 32.5 kg keeping the motor temperatures under 80◦C.
The main contribution of this paper is the introduction of a
new viscoelastic liquid cooled actuator and a thorough study
of its performance and its use on a multidof testbed. We
demonstrate that the use of liquid cooling and the elastomer
significantly improve joint position controllability and power
density over traditional SEAs. More concretely, we 1) design
2
a new actuator, dubbed the VLCA, 2) extensively study
viscoelastic materials, 3) extensively analyze torque feedback
controllers for VLCAs, and 4) examine the performance in a
multidof prototype.
II. BACKGROUND
Existing actuators can be characterized using four criteria:
power source (electric or hydraulic), cooling type (air or liquid), elasticity of the drivetrain (rigid or elastic), and drivetrain
type (direct, harmonic drive, ball screw, etc.) [14], [15]. One of
the most powerful and common solutions is the combination of
hydraulic, liquid-cooling, rigid and direct drive actuation. This
achieves high power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios,
joint position controllability, and shock tolerance. Existing
robots that use this type of actuators include Atlas, Spot, Big
Dog, and Wildcat of Boston Dynamics, BLEEX of Berkeley
[16], and HyQ of IIT [17]. However, hydraulics are less
energy efficient primarily because they require more energy
transformations [18]. Typically, a gasoline engine or electric
motor spins a pump, which compresses hydraulic fluid, which
is modulated by a hydraulic servo valve, which finally causes
a hydraulic piston to apply a force. Each stage in this process
incurs some efficiency loss, and the total losses can be very
significant.
The combination of electric, air-cooled, rigid, and harmonic
drive actuators are other widely used actuation types. Some
robots utilizing these actuator types include Asimo of Honda,
HRP2,3,4 of AIST [19], HUBO of KAIST [20], REEM-C of
PAL Robotics, JOHNNIE and LOLA of Tech. Univ. of Munich
[21], [22], CHIMP of CMU [23], Robosimian of NASA JPL
[24], and more. These actuators have precise position control
and high torque density. For example, LOLA’s theoretical
knee peak torque-density (129N m/kg) is comparable to ours
(107N m/kg), although they did not validate their number
experimentally and their max speed is roughly 2/3 of our max
speed [22]. Compared to us, low shock tolerance, low fidelity
force sensing, and low efficiency gearboxes are common
drawbacks of these type of actuators. According to Harmonic
Drive AGs catalog, the efficiency of harmonic drives may be
as poor as 25% and only increases above 80% when optimal
combinations of input shaft speed, ambient temperature, gear
ratio, and lubrication are present. Conversely, the efficiency of
our VLCA is consistently above 80% due to the use of a ball
screw mechanism.
[25] used liquid cooling for electric, rigid, harmonic
drive actuators to enhance continuous power-to-weight ratio.
The robots using this type of actuation include SCHAFT
and Jaxon [26]. These actuators share the advantages and
disadvantages of electric, rigid, harmonic drive actuators, but
have a significant increase of the continuous power output
and torque density. One of our studies [13], indicates a 2x
increase in sustained power output by retrofitting an electric
motor with liquid cooling. Other published results indicate a
6x increase in torque density through liquid cooling [14], [27],
though such performance required custom-designing a motor
specifically for liquid cooling. In our case we use an off-theshelf electric motor. In contrast with our design, these actuators
do not employ viscoelastic materials reducing their mechanical
robustness and high quality force sensing and control.
Although the increased power density achieved via liquid cooling amplifies an electric actuator’s power, the rigid
drivetrain is still vulnerable to external impacts. To increase
impact tolerance, many robots (e.g. Walkman and COMAN
of IIT [28], Valkyrie of NASA [29], MABEL and MARLO in
UMich [30], [31], and StarlETH of ETH [32]) adopt electric,
air-cooled, elastic, harmonic drive actuators. This type of
actuation provides high quality force sensing, force control,
impact resistance, and energy efficiency. However, precise
joint position control is difficult because of the elasticity in
the drivetrain and the coupled effect of force feedback control
and realtime latencies [33]. Low efficiency originating from
the harmonic drives is another drawback.
As an alternative to harmonic drives, ball screws are great
drives for mechanical power transmission. SAFFiR, THOR,
and ESCHER of Virginia Tech [34]–[36], M2V2 of IHMC
[37], Spring Flamingo of MIT [38], Hume of UT Austin [11],
and the X1 Mina exoskeleton of NASA [39] use electric,
air-cooled, elastic, ball-screw drives. These actuators show
energy efficiency, good power and force density, low noise
force sensing, high fidelity force controllability, and low
backlash. Compared to these actuators our design significantly
reduces the bulk of the actuator and increases its joint position
controllability. There are some other actuators that have special
features such as the electric actuators used in MIT’s cheetah
[40], which allow for shock resistance through a transparent
but backlash-prone drivetrain. However, the lack of passive
damping limits the joint position controllability of these type
of actuators compared to us.
III. VISCOELASTIC MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION
The primary driver for using elastomers instead of metal
springs is to benefit from their intrinsic damping properties.
However, the mechanical properties of viscoelastic materials
can be difficult to predict, thus making the design of an
actuator based on these materials a challenging endeavor.
The most challenging aspect of incorporating elastomers
into the structural path of an actuator is in estimating or modeling their complex mechanical properties. Elastomers possess both hysteresis and strain-dependent stress, which result
in nonlinear force displacement characteristics. Additionally,
elastomers also exhibit time-varying stress-relaxation effects
when exposed to a constant load. The result of this effect is a
gradual reduction of restoration forces when operating under a
load. A third challenge when using elastomers in compression
is compression set. This phenomenon occurs when elastomers
are subjected to compressive loads over long periods of time.
An elastomer that has been compressed will exhibit a shorter
free-length than an uncompressed elastomer. Compression set
is a common failure mode for o-rings, and in our application,
it could lead to actuator backlash if not accounted for properly.
To address these various engineering challenges we designed experiments to empirically measure the following four
properties of our viscoelastic springs: 1) force versus displacement, 2) stress relaxation, 3) compression set, and 4)
3
E-stop
Load cell
Displacement
sensor
Elastic material
EtherCAT-based
embedded
control system
Belt drive
BLDC motor
2500
2000
1500
Force (N)
1000
Ball screw drive
(a) Viscoelastic material Testbed
0
-500
Spring steel
Viton 75A
Polyurethane 80A
Polyurethane 90A
EPDM 80A
Reinforced Silicon 70A
Buna- N 90A
Silicone 90A
-1000
Reinforced silicone 70A
Viton 75A
Buna-N 90A
Polyurethane 80A
Polyurethane 90A
Spring steel
500
EPDM 80A
-1500
-2000
0
1
2
3
4
5
-2500
6
-5
Compression set (%)
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
Dispacement (m)
5
10 -4
(c) Force vs Displacement curve
Phase (deg)
Force (N)
Magnitude (dB)
(b) Complession set
4
time (sec)
(d) Stess relaxation
Increasing system bandwidth
Spring steel
Viton 75A
Buna-N 90A
Polyurethane 90A
Frequency (Hz)
(e) Dynamic response of four elastomer
Fig. 1. Viscoelastic material test. (a) The elastomer testbed is designed and constructed to study various material properties of candidate viscoelastic
materials. (b) We measured each elastomers free length both before and after they were placed in the preloaded testbed. (c) A strong correlation between
material hardness and the materials stiffness can be observed. An exception to this correlation is the fabric reinforced silicone which we hypothesize had
increased stiffness due to the inelastic nature of its reinforcing fabric. Nonlinear effects such as hysteresis can also be observed in this plot. (d) We command
a rapid change in material displacements and then measured the materials force change versus time for 300 seconds. Note that the test of reinforced silicone
70A is omitted due to its excessive stiffness. (d) Although the bandwidths of the four responses are different, their damping ratios (signal peak value) are
relatively constant, which implies different damping.
frequency response, which will be used to characterize each
material’s effective viscous damping. We built a viscoelastic
material testbed, depicted in Fig. 1(a), to measure each of
these properties. We selected and tested the seven candidate
materials that are listed in Table I. The dimension of the tested
materials are fairly regular, with 46mm diameter and 27mm
thickness.
A. Compression set
Compression set is the reduction in length of an elastomer
after prolonged compression. The drawback of using materials with compression set in compliant actuation is that the
materials must be installed with larger amounts of preload
forces to avoid the material sliding out of place during usage.
To measure this property, we measured each elastomers free
length both before and after the elastomer was placed in
the preloaded testbed. The result of our compression set
experiments are summarized in Table I.
B. Force versus displacement
In the design of compliant actuation, it is essential to know
how much a spring will compress given an applied force.
This displacement determines the required sensitivity of a
spring-deflection sensor and also affects mechanical aspects
of the actuator such as usable actuator range of motion and
clearance to other components due to Poisson ratio expansion.
In this experiment, we identify the force versus displacement
curves for the various elastomer springs. Experimental data
for all eight springs as shown in Fig 1(b). Note that there is
a disagreement between our empirical measurements and the
analytic model relating stiffness to hardness, i.e. the Gent’s
relation shown in [41]. This mismatch arises because in our
experiments the materials are preloaded whereas the analytical
models assume unloaded materials.
4
Materials
Compression Linearity
set (%)
(R-square)
Linear stiffness
(N/mm)
Spring steel
0
0.996
860.8
Polyurethane 90A
2
0.992
8109
Preloaded elastic
modulus (N/mm)
Material damping
(N s/m)
Creep
(%)
Material
Cost ($)
0
0
-
112.5
16000
15.3
19.40
Reinforced silicone 70A
2.7
0.978
57570
798.7
242000
-
29.08
Buna-N 90A
2.8
0.975
11270
156.4
29000
25
51.47
Viton 75A
4
0.963
2430
33.7
9000
30.14
105.62
Polyurethane 80A
4.5
0.993
2266
31.4
4000
16.8
19.40
EPDM 80A
6.48
0.939
6499
90.2
16000
23.4
35.28
Silicone 90A
-
0.983
12460
172.9
37000
10.7
29.41
TABLE I
S UMMARY OF VISCOELASTIC MATERIALS
C. Stress relaxation
E. Selection of Polyurethane 90A
Stress-relaxation is an undesirable property in compliant
actuators for two reasons. First, the time-varying force degrades the quality of the compliant material as a force sensor.
When a material with significant stress-relaxation properties
is used, the only way to accurately estimate actuator force
based on deflection data is to model the effect and then pass
deflection data through this model to obtain a force estimate.
This model introduces complexity and more room for error.
The second reason stress-relaxation can be problematic is that
it can lead to the loss of contact forces in compression-based
spring structures.
The experiment for stress relaxation is conducted as follow:
1) enforce a desired displacement to a material, 2) record
the force data over time from the load cell, 3) subtract the
initially measured force from all of the force data. Empirically
measured stress-relaxation properties for each of the materials
are shown in Fig. 1 (c), which represents force offsets as
time goes under the same displacement enforced. Note that
each material shows different initial force due to the different
stiffness and each initial force data is subtracted in the plot.
A variety of other experiments were conducted to strengthen
our analysis and are summarized in Table I. Based on these
results, Polyurethane 90A appears to be a strong candidate
for viscoelastic actuators based on its high linearity (0.992),
low compression set (2%), low creep (15%), and reasonably
high damping (16000 N s/m). It is also the cheapest of the
materials and comes in the largest variety of hardnesses and
sizes.
D. Dynamic response
In regards to compliant actuation, the primary benefit of
using an elastomer spring is its viscous properties, which can
characterize the dynamic response of an actuator in series with
such a component. To perform this experiment, we generate
motor current to track an exponential chirp signal, testing
frequencies between 0.001Hz and 200Hz. Given the inputoutput relation of the system, we can fit a second order transfer
function to the experimental data to obtain an estimate of
the system’s viscous properties. However, this measure also
includes the viscoelastic testbed’s ballscrew drive train friction
(Fig. 1(a)). To quantify the elastomer spring damping independently of the damping of the testbed drive train, the latter
(8000 N s/m) was first characterized using a metal spring,
and then subtracted from subsequent tests of the elastomer
springs to obtain estimates for the viscous properties of the
elastomer materials. Fig. 1(d) shows the frequency response
results for current input and force output of three different
springs, while controlling the damping ratio. The elastomers
have higher stiffness than the metal spring, hence their natural
frequencies are higher.
IV. V ISCOELASTIC L IQUID C OOLED ACTUATION
The design objectives of the VLCA are 1) power density, 2)
efficiency, 3) impact tolerance, 4) joint position controllability,
and 5) force controllability. Compactness of actuators is also
one of the critical design parameters, which encourage us
to use elastomers instead of metal springs and mechanical
dampers. Our previous work [13] shows a significant improvement in motor current, torque, output power and system
efficiency for liquid cooled commercial off-the-shelf (COTS)
electric motors and studied several Maxon motors for comparison. As an extension of this previous work, in this new
study we studied COTS motors and their thermal behavior
models and selected the Maxon EC-max 40 brushless 120 W
(Fig. 2(e)), with a custom housing designed for the liquid
cooling system (Fig. 2(h)). The limit of continuous current
increases by a factor of 3.59 when liquid convection is used
for cooling the motor. Therefore, a continuous motor torque
of 0.701 N · m is theoretically achievable. Energetically, this
actuator is designed to achieve 366 W continuous power
and 1098W short-term power output with an 85% ball screw
efficiency (Fig. 2(b)) since short-term power is generally three
time larger than continuous power. With the total actuator
mass of 1.692 kg, this translates into a continuous power of
216W/kg and a short-term power of 650W/kg. The liquid
pump, radiator, and reservoir are products of Swiftech which
weight approximately 1kg. By combining convection liquid
cooling, high power brushless DC (BLDC) motors, and a
high-efficiency ball screw, we aim to surpass existing electric
actuation technologies with COTS motors in terms of power
density.
In terms of controls, a common problem with conventional
SEAs is their lack of physical damping at their mechanical
output. As a result, active damping must be provided from
torque produced by the motor [42]. However, the presence of
5
(e) BLDC Motor
(a) Timing belt transmission
(b) Ball screw drive
(c) Load cell
(d) Actuator output
(f) Quadrature encoder
(g) Temperature sensor
(h) Liquid cooling jacket
Opposite side
Motor part
Rubber part
Load part
(i) Tube connector
(j) Polyuretane elastomer
(k) Compliance deflection sensor
(l) Mechanical ground pivot
(m) Quadrature encoder (deflection)
ground
Fig. 2. Viscoelastic Liquid Cooled Actuator. The labels are explanatory. In addition, the actuator contains five sensors: a load cell, a quadrature encoder
for the electric motor, a temperature sensor, and two elastomer deflection sensors. One of the elastomer deflection sensors is absolute and the other one is a
quadrature encoder. The quadrature encoder gives high quality velocity data of the elastomer deflection.
signal latency and derivative signal filtering limit the amount
by which this active damping can be increased, resulting
in SEA driven robots achieving only relatively low output
impedances [33] and thus operating with limited joint position
control accuracy and bandwidth. Our VLCA design incorporates damping directly into the compliant element itself,
reducing the requirements placed on active damping efforts
from the controller. The incorporation of passive damping aims
to increase the output impedance while retaining compliance
properties, resulting in higher joint position control bandwidth.
The material properties we took into consideration will be
introduced in Section III. The retention of a compliant element
in the VLCA drive enables the measurement of actuator forces
based on deflection. The inclusion of a load cell (Fig. 2(c)) on
the actuators output serves as a redundant force sensor and is
used to calibrate the force displacement characteristics of the
viscoelastic element.
Mechanical power is transmitted when the motor turns a
ball nut via a low-loss timing belt and pulley (Fig. 2 (a)),
which causes a ball screw to apply a force to the actuator’s
output (Fig. 2(d)). The rigid assembly consisting of the motor,
ball screw, and ball nut connects in series to a compliant viscoelastic element (Fig. 2(j)), which connects to the mechanical
ground of the actuator (Fig. 2(k)). When the actuator applies a
force, the reaction force compresses the viscoelastic element.
The viscoelastic element enables the actuator to be more shock
tolerant than rigid actuators yet also maintain high output
impedance due to the inherent damping in the elastomer.
V. ACTUATOR F ORCE F EEDBACK C ONTROL
To demonstrate various impedance behaviors in operational
space, robots must have a stable force controller. Stable and
accurate operational space control (OSC) is not trivial to
achieve because of the bandwidth interference between outer
position feedback control (OSC) and inner torque feedback
control [11]. Since stable torque control is a critical component
for a successful OSC implementation, we extensively study
various force feedback controls.
Jm (kg m2 )
bm (N m s)
mr (kg)
br (N s/m)
kr (N/m)
3.8e−5
2.0e−4
1.3
2.0e4
5.5e6
TABLE II
ACTUATOR PARAMETERS
The first step in this analysis is to identify the actuator
dynamics. The transfer functions of the reaction force sensed
in the series elastic actuators (elastomer deflection) are well
explained in [43]. When the actuator output is fixed, the
transfer function from the motor current input to the elastomer
deflection is given by
Px =
xr
ηkτ Nm
=
, (1)
2 + m )s2 + (b N 2 + b )s + k
im
(Jm Nm
r
m m
r
r
where η, kτ , Nm , and im are the ball screw efficiency,
the torque constant of a motor, the speed reduction ratio of
the motor to the ball screw, and the current input for the
motor, respectively. The equations follow the nomenclature in
Fig. 3(a). We can find η, kτ , and Nm in data sheets, which are
0.9, 0.0448 N · m/A, and 3316 respectively. The gear ratio of
the drivetrain is computed by dividing the speed reduction of
pulleys (2.111) with lead length of the ball screw (0.004m)
using the equation 2π × 2.111/0.004.
However, we need to experimentally identify kr , br , Jm ,
and bm . We infer kr by dividing the force measurement
from the load cell by the elastomer deflection. The other
parameters are estimated by comparing the frequency response
of the model and experimental data. The frequency response
test is done with the ankle actuator while prohibiting joint
movement with a load and an offset force command. The
results are presented in Fig. 3 with solid gray lines. Note that
the dotted gray lines are the estimated response from the transfer function (measured elastomer force/ input motor force)
using the parameters of Table. II. The estimated response and
experimental result match closely with one another, implying
that the parameters we found are close to the actual values.
We also study the frequency response for different load
masses to understand how the dynamics changes as the joint
moves. When 10kg is attached to the end of link, the reflected
6
(a)
VCLA
-149
o
27.5 Hz
Fig. 3. Frequency response of VLCA. Gray solid lines are experimental data
and the other lines are estimated response with the model using empirically
parameters.
(b)
Open-loop
PDm
PIDm
PDf
PDm + DOB
60
Magnitude (dB)
Experiment result
40
20
0
-20
-40
0
Phase margin
-45
47.6
-90
41.0
1) Proportional (P) + Derivative (Df ) using velocity signal
obtained by a low-pass derivative filtered elastomer
deflection
2) Proportional (P) + Derivative (Dm ) using motor velocity
signal measured by a quadrature encoder connected to
a motor axis
The second controller (PDm ) has benefits over the first one
(PDf ) with respect to sensor signal quality. The velocity of
motor is directly measured by a quadrature encoder rather than
low-pass filtered elastomer deflection data, which is relatively
noisy and lagged. In addition, Fig. 4 shows that the phase
margin of the second controller (47.6) is larger than the first
one (17.1).
To remove the force tracking error at low frequencies, we
consider two options: augmenting the controller either with
integral control or with a DOB on the PDm controller. To
compare the two controllers, we analyzed the phase margins
of all the mentioned controllers. First, we chose to focus on
the location where the sensor data returns in order to address
the time delay of digital controllers (Fig. 4 (a) and (c)). Next,
we have to compute the open-loop transfer function for each
closed loop system. For example, the PDf controller’s closed
loop transfer function is
kr Px
kp (Fr − e−T s Fk ) + Fr − kd,f Qd e−T s Fk ,
N
(2)
where Fk , Fr , T , and Qd are the measured force from a
elastomer deflection, a reference force, a time delay, a low
pass derivative filter, respectively.For convenience, we use N
instead of the multiplication of three terms, ηkτ Nm . When
34.0
-225
10
(c)
42.8
17.7
-135
-180
mass to the actuator varies from 1500kg to 2500kg because
the length of the effective moment arm changes depending on
joint position. In Fig. 3(b), the bode plots are presented and
the response is not significantly different than the fixed output
case. Therefore, we design and analyze the feedback controller
based on the fixed output dynamics.
For the force feedback controller, we first compare two
options, which we have used in our previous studies [11],
[12]:
Fk =
kr
-3dB
Phase (deg)
Inf. mass
2500 kg
2000 kg
1500 kg
0
10
1
10 2
Frequency (Hz)
VCLA
kr
s
Fig. 4. Stability analysis of controllers. Phase margins of each controllers
and open-loop system are presented.
gathering the term with e−T s of Eq. (2), we obtain
Fk
kr Px (Kp + 1)/N
=
.
Fr
1 + e−T s kr Px (Kp + Kd,f Qd )/N
(3)
Then, the open-loop transfer function of the closed system
with the time delay is
open
PPD
= kr Px (Kp + Kd,f Qd )/N.
f
(4)
We can apply the same method for the PIDm and PDm +DOB
controllers.
The transfer function of PIDm , which is presented in
Fig. 4(c), is
1
kr Px
(Fr − e−T s Fk )(Kp + Ki ) + Fr
Fk =
N
s
(5)
Fk
−T s
− Kd,m e
sNm
.
kr
Then it becomes
Fk
kr Px (Kp + Ki /s + 1)/N
=
.
Fr
1 + e−T s Px (kr (Kp + Ki /s) + Kd sNm )/N
(6)
When we apply a DOB instead of integral control, we need
the inverse of the plant. In our case, the plant of the DOB is
PDm , which is similar to Eq. (6) except that Ki and e−T s are
omitted:
kr Px (Kp + 1)
PPDm (= Pc ) =
.
(7)
N + Px (kr Kp + Kd,m sNm )
7
Fig. 5. Robotic testbed. Our testbed consists of two VLCAs at the ankle
and the knee. The foot of the testbed is fixed on the ground. The linkages
are designed to vary the maximum peak torques and velocities depending on
postures. As the joint positions change, the ratios between ball screw velocities
(L̇0,1 ) and joint velocities (q̇0,1 ) also change because of effective lengths of
moment arms vary. The linkages are designed to exert more torque when the
robot crouches, which is the posture that the gravitational loads on the joints
are large.
The formulation of PDm including the DOB, which is shown
in Fig. 4(c), is
Fk =
kr Px (Kp + 1)(Fd − e−T s Pc−1 Qτ d Fk )
, (8)
(N + e−T s Px (kr Kp + Kd,m sNm )) (1 − Qτ d )
the hip, and the foot is fixed on the ground. With this testbed,
we intended to demonstrate coordinated position control with
two VLCAs, the viability of liquid cooling on an articulated
platform, cartesian position control of a weighted end effector,
and verification of a linkage design.
The two joints each have a different linkage structure that
was carefully designed so that the moment arm accommodates
the expected torques and joint velocities as the robot posture
changes (Fig. 5). For example, each joint can exert a peak
torque of approximately 270 N m and the maximum joint
velocity ranges between 7.5 rad/s and 20+ rad/s depending
on the mechanical advantage of the linkage along the configurations. The joints can exert a maximum continuous torque
of 91 N m at the point of highest mechanical advantage. This
posture dependent ratio of torque and velocity is a unique
benefit of prismatic actuators.
Given cartesian motion trajectories, which are 2nd order Bspline or sinusoidal functions, the centralized controller computes the torque commands with operational space position
and velocity, which are updated by the sensed joint position
and velocity. The OSC formulation that we use is
−1
τ = AJhip
(ẍdes + Kp e + Kd ė − J˙hip q̇) + b + g,
(11)
where A, b, and g represent inertia, coriolis, and gravity
joint torque, respectively. ẍdes , e, and ė are desired trajectory
acceleration, position and velocity error, respectively. q̇ ∈ R2
is the joint velocity of the robot and τ is the joint torque. Jhip
is a jacobian of the hip, which is a 2 × 2 square matrix and
assumed to be full-rank.
where Qτ d is a second order low-pass filter. Then the transfer
function is
VII. R ESULTS
Fk
kr Px (Kp + 1)
.
=
We first conducted various single actuator tests to show
Fd
N (1 − Qτ d ) + e−T s (N Qτ d + Px (kr Kp + Kd,m sNm ))
(9) basic performance such as torque and joint position controllability, continuous and peak torque, and impact resistance. SubThe open-loop transfer function is
sequently, we focused on the performance of OSC using the
N Qτ d + Px (kr Kp + Kd,m sNm )
open
robotic testbed integrated with DOB based torque controllers
PPD
=
(10)
m +DOB
N (1 − Qτ d )
to demonstrate actuator efficiency and high power motions.
open
open
open
open
The bode plots of PPD
,
P
,
P
,
and
P
PDm
PIDm
PDm +DOB
f
are presented in Fig. 4(b). The gains (Kp , Kd,m , Ki ) are the A. Single Actuator Tests
same as the values that we use in the experiments presented in
Fig. 6(a) shows the experimental results of our frequency
Section VII-A, which are 4, 15, and 300, respectively. The PDf response testing as well as the estimated response based on
controller uses Kd Nm /kr for Kd,f to normalize the derivative the transfer functions. We compare three types of controllers:
gain. The cutoff frequency of the DOB is set to 15Hz because PD , PID , and PD + DOB. As we predicted in the
m
m
m
this is where the PDm +DOB shows a magnitude trend similar analysis of Section V, the PD + DOB controller shows less
m
to the integral controller (PIDm ). The results imply that the phase drop and overshoot than PID . The integral control
m
PDm +DOB controller is more stable than PIDm with respect feedback gain used in the experiment is 300 and the cutoff
to phase margin and maximum phase lag. This analysis is also frequency of the DOB’s Q filter is 60Hz, which shows
τd
experimentally verified in Section VII-A.
similar error to the PID controller (Fig. 6(b)). Another test
m
VI. ROBOTIC T ESTBED
We built a robotic testbed shown in Fig. 5. To demonstrate dynamic motion, we implemented an operational space
controller (OSC) incorporating the multi-body dynamics of
the robot. We designed and built a robotic testbed (Fig. 5)
consisting of two VLCAs - one for the ankle (q0 ) and one
for the knee (q1 ). The design constrains motion to the sagittal
plane, the robot carries 10kg, 23kg, or 32.5kg of weight at
presented in Fig. 6(c) also supports the stability and accuracy
of torque control. In the test, we command a ramp in joint
torque from 1 to 25N m in 0.1s. The sensed torque (blue solid
line) almost overlaps the commanded torque (red dashed line).
Fig. 6(d) is the result of a joint position control test designed
to show that VLCAs have better joint position controllability
than SEAs using springs. In the experiment, we use a joint
encoder for position control and a motor quadrature encoder
for velocity feedback. To compare the VLCAs performance
8
20
10
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
-1.8
JPos (rad)
Phase (deg)
(c) Torque fast response
Open (estimated)
(estimated)
(estimated)
-2
-2.4
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
70
1
60
0
50
40
-2
-3
2.8
30
0
1
2
3
time (sec)
20
(f) peak force
(d) Position fast response
Actuator force (N)
80
1000
150
500
100
0
-500
time (sec)
50
actuator force
core temperature (w/ liquid)
core temperature (w/o liquid)
0
50
100
150
200
250
0
350
300
Motor temperature (oC)
Error (dB)
(a) Frequency responses of different controllers
Frequency (Hz)
90
2
time (sec)
Reference
100
-1
(sim.) metal spring
(sim.) elastomer
(exp.) command
(exp.) sensed
-2.2
Frequency (Hz)
110
3
0
1.6
Open
x 103
4
command
sensed
Actuator force (N)
Magnitude (dB)
5
Motor temperature (oC)
Torque (Nm)
30
time (sec)
(e) Continous force and core temperature
(b) Error magintude and chirp test trajectories
Fig. 6. Torque Feedback Control Test. (a) Experimental data and estimated response based on the transfer functions are presented. Estimated response of
PD controller is identical to the PD+DOB since DOB theoretically does not change the transfer function. The plot show PD+DOB shows better performance
in terms of less overshoot and smaller phase drop near to the natural frequency. (b) We choose integral controller feedback gain that shows similar accuracy
of PD+DOB’s. The left is error magnitude of three controllers. PD controller has larger error than the other two controller in the low frequency region. The
right is torque trajectories in the time domain.
Load cell (solid holding)
Load cell (w/ elastomer)
Rubber deflection (solid holding)
Rubber deflection (w/ elastomer)
1000
Actuator force (N)
with that of spring-based SEAs, we present simulation results
for a spring-based SEA on the same plot as the experiment
result for the VLCA. The green dashed line is the simulated
step response of our actuator and the yellow dotted line is
the result of the simulation model using the same parameters
except the spring stiffness and damping. The spring stiffness
was selected to be 11% of the elastomer’s, based on the
results of our tests in Section III, and the damping for the
spring case was set to 8000 N s/m which only includes the
drivetrain friction. The results show a notable improvement in
joint position control when using an elastomer instead of a
steel spring.
Fig. 6(e) shows the continous force and the motor core temperature trend with and without liquid cooling. The observed
continous force is 860N and the motor core temperature settles
at 115◦C with liquid cooling. Fig. 6(f) is the the result of shortterm torque test. In the experiment, we fix the output of the
actuator and command a 31A current for 0.5s. The observed
force measured by a loadcell (Fig. 2(c)) is 4500N, which is
a little smaller than the theoretically expected value, 5900N.
Considering that the estimated core temperature surpassed
107◦C (< 155◦C limit), we expect that the theoretical value
is reasonable. Thus, we conclude that the maximum force
density of our actuator is larger than 2700N/kg and potentially
3500N/kg.
Fig. 7 shows loadcell and elastomer force data from the
impact tests. In the tests, we hit the loadcell connected to the
ball screw (Fig. 2(c)) with a hammer falling from a constant
height while fixing the actuator in two different places to
500
0
95% interval
-500
-1000
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
time (ms)
Fig. 7. Impact test. 83 trials are plotted and estimated with gaussian process.
We can see the deflections of the elastomer, which imply that the elastic
element absorbes the external impact force.
compare the rigid actuator to viscoelastic actuator response. In
the rigid scenario, outer case of ballnut, a blue part in Fig. 2,
is fixed to exclude the elastomer from the external impact
force path. In the second case, we fixed the ground pin of the
actuator, which is depicted by a gray part in Fig. 2(l), to see
how the elastomers react to the impact.
The impact experiment is challenging because the number
of data points we can obtain is very small with a 1ms update
rate. To overcome the lack of data points, we estimate the
mean and variance of 83 trials by gaussian process regression.
The results presented in Fig. 7 imply that there is no significant
difference in the forces measured by the loadcell in both
cases, which is predictable because the elastic element is
placed behind the drivetrain. However, the elastomer does
Ankle
command
sensed
20
0
power
supply
14
16
18
20
22
24
14
16
18
20
22
24
40
Wm
Wb
0.2
Hip position (m)
joint
electric
motor
50
30
0
-0.1
14
16
18
20
22
24
1
Wk
Average efficiency
1.5
0.1
Wk / W m
Compliant in
horizontal direction
servo
drive
-20
Knee
Stiff in
vertical direction
Torque (Nm)
9
1
0.5
0.8
14
16
(a) Impedance control
22
0
0.6
0.4
-20
12
14
16
18
40
12
14
16
18
Hip position (m)
0.1
10
12
10
12
14
16
18
14
16
18
1
time (sec)
(b) Operational space impact test
0.9
0.1
0.85
0
0.8
-0.1
2
command
2.5
sensed
0.9
0.75
0.7
0.8
0.65
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.5
time (sec)
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
5 (sec)
3
1
0.5
0.3
0.2
0
-0.2
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0
-0.1
0.8
1
1
time (sec)
0.2
1.5
0.5
-0.4
30
10
1
0
24
Wk / W b
Ankle
20
-10
10
Knee
Torque (Nm)
Hitting down
18
time (sec)
2
2.5
-0.05
0
0.05
(c) Fast up and down (1.7 Hz)
Fig. 8. Operational Space Impedance Control Test. (a) The robot
demonstrates different impedance: stiff in the vertical direction and compliant
in the horizontal direction. The high tracking performance of force feedback
control results in the overlapped commanded and sensed torques. (b) To
show the stability, we hit the weight with a hammer while operating the
impedance control. Even under the impact, force control show stable and
accurate tracking. (c) The robot demonstrates a 1.7Hz up and down motion
while carrying 10kg weight at the hip, and shows a position error of less than
2.5cm.
play a significant role in absorbing energy from the impact
which is evident from large elastomer deflection in the second
case. Thus, the presence of the elastic element mitigates the
propagation of an impulse to the link where the actuator
grounds.
B. Operational Space Impedance Control
Fig. 8 shows our OSC experimental tests (Section VI)
carrying a 10kg weight. In the first test presented in Fig. 8(a),
the commanded behavior is to be compliant in the horizontal
direction (x) and to be stiff in the vertical direction (y).
When pushing the hip with a sponge in the x direction, the
robot smoothly moves back to comply with the push, but it
strongly resists the given vertical disturbance to maintain the
Fig. 9. Efficiency analysis of the ankle actuator. Efficiencies of mechanical
system using electrical power has 3 steps from a power supply to robot joints.
The graph shows the ratio of the mechanical power of the ankle joint and the
motor power and the ratio of the joint power and power supply’s input power.
commanded height. To show the stability of our controller, we
also test the response to impacts by hitting the weight with a
hammer (Fig. 8(b)). Even when there are sudden disturbances,
the torque controllers rapidly respond to maintain good torque
tracking performance as shown in Fig. 6(d).
Fig. 8(c) shows the tracking performance of our system
while following a fast vertical hip trajectory. While traveling 0.3m with 1.7Hz frequency, the hip position errors are
bounded by 0.025m. This result demonstrates that our system
is capable of stable and accurate OSC, which is challenging
because of the bandwidth conflict induced by its cascaded
structure.
C. Efficiency Analysis
Fig. 9 explains the power flow from the power supply to the
robot joint. Input current (Ib ) and voltage (Vb ) are measured
in the micro-controllers and the product of those two yields
the input power from the power supply. θ̇m is measured by the
quadrature encoder connected to the motor’s axis (Fig. 2(f))
and τm is computed from kτ im with im measured in the
micro-controller. Joint velocity is low-pass derivative filtered
joint positions measured at the absolute joint encoders. The
torque (τk ) is computed from projecting the load cell data
across the linkage’s effective moment arm.
In this test, the robot lifts a 23kg load using five different
durations to observe efficiency over a range of different speeds
and torques. The results are presented in Fig. 9 with the
description of three different power measures. The sensed
torque data measured by a load cell is noisy; therefore, we
compute the average of the drivetrain efficiency for a clearer
comparison. The averages are the integrations of efficiency divided by the time durations. Here we only integrate efficiency
while the mechanical power is positive, to prevent confounding
our results by incorporating the work done by gravity.
7
7.5
8
200
100
0
-100
0
7
joint torque
7.5
mechanical power
8
400
200
0
-200
-400
-600
200
100
0
6.5
7
7.5
Mechanical power (W)
Ankle
7
200
-200
6.5
Knee
8
5
4
6.5
Joint torque (Nm)
7.5
8
(a) 2Hz up and down motion
Ankle
0
45
40
-1000
35
-2000
-3000
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
actuator force
3
3.5
4
motor
temperature
30
4.5
80
Knee
-1000
60
-2000
-3000
40
-4000
0
Power (W)
Ankle
Knee
6.5
6
1000
Actuator force (N)
command
joint encoder
motor encoder
2.6
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Motor temperature (oC)
Joint position (rad)
10
4.5
total
ankle
knee
1500
1000
500
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
time (sec)
(b) Heavy weight lift
Fig. 10. High power motion experiment. (a) Joint position data from joint encoder and motor encoder are shown. In this experiment, the maximum observed
torque of the ankle joint is 250 N m and the maximum observed mechanical power of the knee joint is 310W. (b) The robot lifts by 0.3m a 32.5 kg load
during 0.4s. There is still a safety margin with respect to the limits equal to 5900N and 155◦C.
The experimental results show that the drivetrain efficiency
is approximately 0.89, which means that we lose only a small
amount of power in the drivetrain and most of the torque
from the motor is delivered to the joint. This high efficiency
indicates only minor drivetrain friction, which is beneficial for
dynamics-based motion controllers.
D. High Power Motion Experiment
To demonstrate high power motions such as fast vertical
trajectories and heavy payload lifts, we use the motor position
control mode, which uses the quadrature encoders attached
directly to the motor for feedback. Fig. 10(a) presents the
results of a test comprised of 2Hz vertical motion with 0.32
m of travel while carrying a load of 10 kg at the hip.
With respect to mechanical power, the knee joint repeatedly
exerts 305W, which is close to the predicted constant power
(360W). Although the limited range of motion makes it hard
to demonstrate continuous mechanical power, these results
convincingly support our claim of enhanced continuous power
enabled through liquid cooling.
Fig. 10(b) presents another test in which the robot lifts a
32.5kg weight. We can see that the robot operates in the safe
region (≤ 5900N and ≤ 155◦C) while demonstrating high
power motion.
6(e). As we can see, when turning off liquid cooling the
temperature rises quickly above safety limits whereas when
turning on the cooling we can sustain large payload torques
for long periods of time. The use of elastomers versus steel
springs has demonstrated a clear improvement on joint position
performance as shown in Fig. 6(d). This capability is important
to achieve a large range of output joint or Cartesian space
impedances.
In the future we will explore further reducing the size
of our viscoelastic liquid cooled actuators. Maintaining the
current compact design structure we can still reduce another
significant percentage the bulk of the actuator by exploring
new types of bearings, ballnut sizes and piston bearings at the
front end of the actuator. We will also explore using different
material for the liquid cooling actuator jacket. The current
polyoxymethylene material is easily breakable and develops
cracks due to the vibrations and impacts of this kind of robotic
applications. In the future we will switch to sealed metal
chambers for instance. Further in the future we will consider
designing our own motor stators and rotors for improved performance. We expect this kind of actuators to make their way
into full humanoid robots and high performance exoskeleton
devices and we look forward to participate in such interesting
future studies.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
VIII. C ONCLUDING R EMARKS
Overall our main contribution has been on the design and
extensive testing of a new viscoelastic liquid cooled actuator
for robotics.
One of the tests addressed is impedance control in the
operational space instead of joint impedance control. It is often
the case that humanoid robots require impedance control in
the operational space. For instance, controlling the operational
space impedance can enable improved locomotion behaviors
such as running. Our controllers demonstrate that we can
control the impedance in the Cartesian operational space as
a potential functionality for future robotic systems. The use
of liquid cooling has allowed to sustain high output torque
for prolonged times as shown in the experiments of Fig.
The authors would like to thank the members of the
Human Centered Robotics Laboratory at The University of
Texas at Austin for their help and support. This work was
supported by the Office of Naval Research, ONR Grant
[grant #N000141512507] and NASA Johnson Space Center,
NSF/NASA NRI Grant [grant #NNX12AM03G].
R EFERENCES
[1] G. A. Pratt and M. M. Williamson, “Series elastic actuators,” in Intelligent Robots and Systems 95. ’Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative
Robots’, Proceedings. 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on,
1995, pp. 399–406.
[2] B. Henze, M. A. Roa, and C. Ott, “Passivity-based whole-body balancing
for torque-controlled humanoid robots in multi-contact scenarios,” The
International Journal of Robotics Research, p. 0278364916653815, Jul.
2016.
11
[3] N. Paine, J. S. Mehling, and J. Holley, “Actuator Control for the NASAJSC Valkyrie Humanoid Robot: A Decoupled Dynamics Approach for
Torque Control of Series Elastic Robots,” Journal of Field Robotics,
2015.
[4] J. Hurst, A. Rizzi, and D. Hobbelen, “Series elastic actuation: Potential
and pitfalls,” in International Conference on Climbing and Walking
Robots, 2004.
[5] N. Kashiri, G. A. Medrano-Cerda, N. G. Tsagarakis, M. Laffranchi, and
D. Caldwell, “Damping control of variable damping compliant actuators,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
(ICRA). IEEE, 2015, pp. 850–856.
[6] C.-M. Chew, G.-S. Hong, and W. Zhou, “Series damper actuator: a
novel force/torque control actuator,” in 2004 4th IEEE/RAS International
Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, pp. 533–546.
[7] D. Rollinson, Y. Bilgen, B. Brown, F. Enner, S. Ford, C. Layton,
J. Rembisz, M. Schwerin, A. Willig, P. Velagapudi, and H. Choset,
“Design and architecture of a series elastic snake robot,” in 2014
IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
(IROS 2014). IEEE, 2014, pp. 4630–4636.
[8] K. Abe, T. Suga, and Y. Fujimoto, “Control of a biped robot driven by
elastomer-based series elastic actuator,” in 2012 12th IEEE International
Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC). IEEE, 2012, pp. 1–6.
[9] J. Austin, A. Schepelmann, and H. Geyer, “Control and evaluation of
series elastic actuators with nonlinear rubber springs,” in 2015 IEEE/RSJ
International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
IEEE, 2015, pp. 6563–6568.
[10] D. Rollinson, S. Ford, B. Brown, and H. Choset, “Design and Modeling
of a Series Elastic Element for Snake Robots,” ASME Proceedings
of the Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, pp. V001T08A002–
V001T08A002, Oct. 2013.
[11] D. Kim, Y. Zhao, G. Thomas, B. R. Fernandez, and L. Sentis, “Stabilizing Series-Elastic Point-Foot Bipeds Using Whole-Body Operational
Space Control,” Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1362–1379,
2016.
[12] N. Paine, S. Oh, and L. Sentis, “Design and control considerations for
high-performance series elastic actuators,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on
Mechatronics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1080–1091, 2014.
[13] N. Paine and L. Sentis, “Design and Comparative Analysis of a
Retrofitted Liquid Cooling System for High-Power Actuators,” Actuators, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 182–202, 2015.
[14] I. W. Hunter, J. M. Hollerbach, and J. Ballantyne, “A comparative
analysis of actuator technologies for robotics,” Robotics Review, vol. 2,
pp. 299–342, 1991.
[15] N. A. Paine, “High-performance Series Elastic Actuation,” Ph.D. dissertation, Austin, 2014.
[16] A. B. Zoss, H. Kazerooni, and A. Chu, “Biomechanical design of
the berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (bleex),” Transactions On
Mechatronics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 128–138, 2006.
[17] C. Semini, “Hyq-design and development of a hydraulically actuated
quadruped robot,” Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.), University of Genoa,
Italy, 2010.
[18] P. A. Bhounsule, J. Cortell, A. Grewal, B. Hendriksen, J. D. Karssen,
C. Paul, and A. Ruina, “Low-bandwidth reflex-based control for lower
power walking: 65 km on a single battery charge,” The International
Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1305–1321, 2014.
[19] N. Kanehira, T. Kawasaki, S. Ohta, T. Ismumi, T. Kawada, F. Kanehiro,
S. Kajita, and K. Kaneko, “Design and experiments of advanced leg
module (hrp-2l) for humanoid robot (hrp-2) development,” in International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol. 3.
IEEE, 2002, pp. 2455–2460.
[20] I.-W. Park, J.-Y. Kim, J. Lee, and J.-H. Oh, “Mechanical design of
humanoid robot platform khr-3 (kaist humanoid robot 3: Hubo),” in 5th
International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 2005, pp. 321–
326.
[21] M. Gienger, K. Loffler, and F. Pfeiffer, “Towards the design of a biped
jogging robot,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation,
vol. 4. IEEE, 2001, pp. 4140–4145.
[22] S. Lohmeier, T. Buschmann, H. Ulbrich, and F. Pfeiffer, “Modular joint
design for performance enhanced humanoid robot lola,” in International
Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2006, pp. 88–93.
[23] A. Stentz, H. Herman, A. Kelly, E. Meyhofer, G. C. Haynes, D. Stager,
B. Zajac, J. A. Bagnell, J. Brindza, C. Dellin et al., “Chimp, the cmu
highly intelligent mobile platform,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 32,
no. 2, pp. 209–228, 2015.
[24] S. Karumanchi, K. Edelberg, I. Baldwin, J. Nash, J. Reid, C. Bergh,
J. Leichty, K. Carpenter, M. Shekels, M. Gildner et al., “Team robosimian: Semi-autonomous mobile manipulation at the 2015 darpa
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
robotics challenge finals,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 34, no. 2,
pp. 305–332, 2017.
J. Urata, Y. Nakanishi, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Design of high torque
and high speed leg module for high power humanoid,” in International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 2010, pp. 4497–
4502.
K. Kojima, T. Karasawa, T. Kozuki, E. Kuroiwa, S. Yukizaki, S. Iwaishi,
T. Ishikawa, R. Koyama, S. Noda, F. Sugai, S. Nozawa, Y. Kakiuchi, K. Okada, and M. Inaba, “Development of life-sized high-power
humanoid robot JAXON for real-world use,” in 15th International
Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 2015, pp. 838–843.
F. Aghili, J. M. Hollerbach, and M. Buehler, “A modular and highprecision motion control system with an integrated motor,” Transactions
on Mechatronics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 317–329, 2007.
N. G. Tsagarakis, S. Morfey, G. M. Cerda, L. Zhibin, and D. G.
Caldwell, “Compliant humanoid coman: Optimal joint stiffness tuning
for modal frequency control,” in International Conference on Robotics
and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, 2013, pp. 673–678.
N. A. Radford, P. Strawser, K. Hambuchen, J. S. Mehling, W. K.
Verdeyen, A. S. Donnan, J. Holley, J. Sanchez, V. Nguyen, L. Bridgwater
et al., “Valkyrie: Nasa’s first bipedal humanoid robot,” Journal of Field
Robotics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 397–419, 2015.
J. W. Grizzle, J. Hurst, B. Morris, H.-W. Park, and K. Sreenath,
“Mabel, a new robotic bipedal walker and runner,” in American Control
Conference (ACC). IEEE, 2009, pp. 2030–2036.
A. Ramezani, “Feedback Control Design for MARLO, a 3D-Bipedal
Robot,” Ph.D. dissertation, 2013.
M. Hutter, C. Gehring, M. Bloesch, M. A. Hoepflinger, C. D. Remy,
and R. Siegwart, “Starleth: A compliant quadrupedal robot for fast,
efficient, and versatile locomotion,” in Adaptive Mobile Robotics. World
Scientific, 2012, pp. 483–490.
Y. Zhao, N. Paine, K. Kim, and L. Sentis, “Stability and Performance Limits of Latency-Prone Distributed Feedback Controllers,” IEEE
Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 7151–716,
November 2015.
D. Lahr, V. Orekhov, B. Lee, and D. Hong, “Early developments of a
parallelly actuated humanoid, saffir,” in ASME 2013 international design
engineering technical conferences and computers and information in
engineering conference, 2013, pp. V06BT07A054–V06BT07A054.
B. Lee, C. Knabe, V. Orekhov, and D. Hong, “Design of a HumanLike Range of Motion Hip Joint for Humanoid Robots,” in International
Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, Aug. 2014.
C. Knabe, J. Seminatore, J. Webb, M. Hopkins, T. Furukawa,
A. Leonessa, and B. Lattimer, “Design of a series elastic humanoid
for the darpa robotics challenge,” in 15th International Conference on
Humanoid Robots (Humanoids). IEEE, 2015, pp. 738–743.
J. Pratt and B. Krupp, “Design of a bipedal walking robot,” in Proc. of
SPIE, vol. 6962, 2008, pp. 69 621F1–69 621F13.
J. E. Pratt, “Exploiting inherent robustness and natural dynamics in the
control of bipedal walking robots,” Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Dept.
of Electr. Eng. and Comp. Science, Tech. Rep., 2000.
R. Rea, C. Beck, R. Rovekamp, P. Neuhaus, and M. Diftler, “X1: A
robotic exoskeleton for in-space countermeasures and dynamometry,” in
AIAA SPACE 2013 Conference and Exposition, 2013, p. 5510.
S. Seok, A. Wang, M. Y. M. Chuah, D. J. Hyun, J. Lee, D. M. Otten,
J. H. Lang, and S. Kim, “Design principles for energy-efficient legged
locomotion and implementation on the mit cheetah robot,” Transactions
on Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1117–1129, 2015.
E. Pucci and G. Saccomandi, “A note on the Gent model for rubberlike materials,” Rubber chemistry and technology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp.
839–852, 2002.
M. Hutter, C. D. Remy, M. A. Hoepflinger, and R. Siegwart, “High
compliant series elastic actuation for the robotic leg scarleth,” in Proc.
of the International Conference on Climbing and Walking Robots
(CLAWAR), no. EPFL-CONF-175826, 2011.
Y. Park, S. Oh, and H. Zoe, “Dynamic analysis of Reaction Force sensing
Series Elastic Actuator as Unlumped two mass system,” in IECON 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.
IEEE, 2016, pp. 5784–5789.
| 3cs.SY
|
1
Surprise Search for Evolutionary Divergence
arXiv:1706.02556v1 [cs.NE] 8 Jun 2017
Daniele Gravina, Antonios Liapis, and Georgios N. Yannakakis
Abstract—Inspired by the notion of surprise for unconventional
discovery we introduce a general search algorithm we name
surprise search as a new method of evolutionary divergent search.
Surprise search is grounded in the divergent search paradigm and
is fabricated within the principles of evolutionary search. The
algorithm mimics the self-surprise cognitive process and equips
evolutionary search with the ability to seek for solutions that
deviate from the algorithm’s expected behaviour. The predictive
model of expected solutions is based on historical trails of where
the search has been and local information about the search space.
Surprise search is tested extensively in a robot maze navigation
task: experiments are held in four authored deceptive mazes and
in 60 generated mazes and compared against objective-based
evolutionary search and novelty search. The key findings of this
study reveal that surprise search is advantageous compared to
the other two search processes. In particular, it outperforms
objective search and it is as efficient as novelty search in all
tasks examined. Most importantly, surprise search is faster, on
average, and more robust in solving the navigation problem
compared to any other algorithm examined. Finally, our analysis
reveals that surprise search explores the behavioural space more
extensively and yields higher population diversity compared to
novelty search. What distinguishes surprise search from other
forms of divergent search, such as the search for novelty, is its
ability to diverge not from earlier and seen solutions but rather
from predicted and unseen points in the domain considered.
Index Terms—Surprise search, novelty search, divergent
search, deception, fitness-based evolution, maze navigation,
NEAT.
I. I NTRODUCTION
VER the last 50 years, evolutionary computation (EC)
has shown vast potential in numerical and behavioural
optimization. The most common approach to optimization in
artificial evolution is via an objective function, which rewards
solutions based on their ‘goodness’ [1], i.e. how close they
are to an optimal behaviour (if such a behaviour is known
beforehand) or how much they improve a performance metric.
The objective function (or fitness function) encapsulates the
principle of evolutionary pressure for fitting (adapting) within
the environment. Despite the success of such approaches in a
multitude of tasks [1], [2], they are challenged in deceptive fitness landscapes [3] where the global optimum is neighboured
by low-quality solutions. In such cases, the local search of an
objective-based evolutionary algorithm can guide search away
from a global optimum and towards local optima. As a general
principle, more deceptive problems challenge the design of a
corresponding objective function; this paper follows [4] and
views deception as the intuitive definition of problem hardness.
Many algorithms have been proposed to tackle the problem
O
All authors are with the Institute of Digital Games, University of
Malta, Msida 2080, Malta (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])
of deception, primarily revolving around diversity preservation [5]–[7], which deters premature convergence while still
rewarding proximity to the objective and divergent search [8]
which abandons objectives in favour of rewarding diversity in
the population.
There are, however, problems which lack an easily defined
objective — or a gradient to reaching it. For instance, openended evolution studies within artificial life [9] do not have
a goal state and instead prioritize e.g. survival [10], [11]. In
evolutionary art, music or design, a large body of research
in computational creativity and generative systems [12]–[14]
focuses on the creative capacity of search rather than on the
objectives. In [13], computational creativity is considered on
two core properties of a produced solution: value and novelty
[13]. Value is the degree to which a solution is of high quality,
whereas novelty is the degree to which a solution (or output)
is dissimilar to existing examples. While objective-based EC
can be seen as a metaphor of searching for value, a divergent
EC strategy as novelty search [8], [15] can be considered as
a metaphor of searching for novelty. An effective use of both
in EC can lead to highly novel and valuable at the same time
outcomes [16], thus realizing quality diversity [17]. However,
according to [18], novelty and value are not sufficient for
the discovery of highly creative and unconventional solutions
to problems. While novelty can be considered as a static
property, surprise considers the temporal properties of the
discovery, an important dimension to assess the creativity of
the generated solution [18], [19]. Further studies in general
intelligence and decision making [20] support the importance
of unexpectedness for problem-solving.
Driven by the notion of computational surprise for the
purpose of creatively traversing the search space towards unexpected or serendipitous solutions, this paper proposes surprise
search for the purposes of divergent evolutionary search. The
hypothesis is that searching for unexpected — not merely
unseen — solutions is beneficial to EC as it complements our
search capacities with highly efficient and robust algorithms
beyond the search for objectives or mere novelty. Surprise
search is built upon the novelty search [8] paradigm that
rewards individuals which differ from other solutions in the
same population and a historical archive. Surprise is assumed
to arise from a violation of expectations [21]: as such, it
is different than novelty which rewards deviation from past
and current behaviours. A computational, quantifiable model
of surprise must build expectations based on trends in past
behaviours, and predict future behaviours from which it must
diverge from. In order to create expected behaviours, the
algorithm maintains a lineage of where evolutionary search has
been. These groups of evolutionary lineages require the right
level of locality in the behavioural space — surprise can be
inclusive of all behaviours (globally) or merely consider part
2
of all possible behaviours (locally). Any deviation from these
stepping stones of search would elicit surprise; alternatively,
they can be viewed as serendipitous discovery if the deviation
leads to a surprisingly good point in the behavioural space.
The findings of this paper suggest that surprise constitutes a
powerful drive for computational discovery as it incorporates
predictions of an expected behaviour that it attempts to deviate
from; these predictions may be based on behavioural relationships in the solution space as well as historical trends derived
from the algorithm’s sampling of the domain.
This paper builds upon and extends significantly our earlier
work which introduced the notion of surprise search [22]
and compared its performance against novelty search and
objective-based search [23] in the maze navigation testbed of
[8]. The current paper extends the preliminary study of [23] by
introducing two new maze navigation problems of increased
complexity, and analysing the impact of several parameters
to the behaviour of surprise search. This paper also includes
an extensive comparison between novelty search and surprise
search both in the behavioural and the genotypic space. Finally, to further examine how surprise search performs across
a wide range of problems, we test how it scales in sixty
randomly generated mazes of varying degrees of complexity.
The key findings of the paper suggest that surprise search is as
efficient as novelty search and both algorithms, unsurprisingly,
outperform fitness-based search. Furthermore, surprise search
appears to be the most robust algorithm in the four testbed
tasks and to be the most successful and fastest algorithm in the
60 randomly generated mazes. While both novelty and surprise
search converge to the solution significantly faster than fitnessbased search, surprise search solves the navigation problem
faster, on average, and more often than novelty search. The
experiments of this paper validate our hypothesis that surprise
can be beneficial as a divergent search approach and provide
evidence for its supremacy over novelty search in the tasks
examined.
II. D ECEPTION , D IVERGENT S EARCH AND Q UALITY
D IVERSITY
This section motivates surprise search by providing a brief
overview of the challenges faced by fitness-based approaches
when handling deceptive problems and how divergent search
has been used to address such challenges. The section concludes with a discussion on the relationship between surprise
search and quality diversity algorithms.
A. Deception in Evolutionary Computation
The term deception in the context of EC was introduced
by [3] to describe instances where highly-fit building blocks,
when recombined, may guide search away from the global
optimum. Since that first mention, the notion of deception (including deceptive problems and deceptive search spaces) has
been refined and expanded to describe several problems that
challenge evolutionary search for a solution. [4] argues that
“the only challenging problems are deceptive”. EC-hardness is
often attributed to deception, as well as sampling error [24] and
a rugged fitness landscape [25]. In combinatorial optimisation
problems, the fitness landscape can affect optimisation when
performing local search. Such a search process assumes that
there is a high correlation between the fitness of neighbouring
points in the search space, and that genes in the chromosome
are independent of each other. The latter assumption refers
to epistasis [26] which is a factor of GA-hardness: when
epistasis is high (i.e. where too many genes are dependent
on other genes in the chromosome), the algorithm searches
for a unique optimal combination of genes but no substantial
fitness improvements are noticed [26].
As noted, epistasis is evaluated from the perspective of the
fitness function and thus is susceptible to deception; [27] argue
that deceptive functions can not have low epistasis, although
fitness functions with high epistasis are not necessarily deceptive. Such approaches are often based on the concepts of
correlation, i.e. the degree to which an individual’s fitness
score is well correlated to its neighbours’ in the search space,
or epistasis, i.e. the degree of interaction among genes’ effects.
As noted by [8], most of the factors of EC-hardness originate
from the fitness function itself; however, poorly designed
genetic operators and poorly chosen evolutionary parameters
can exacerbate the problem.
B. Divergent Search
By definition, the biggest issue of a deceptive problem
is premature convergence to local optima, while the global
optimum is difficult to reach as the deceptive fitness landscape
lead the search away from it. Several approaches have been
proposed to counter this behaviour, surveyed by [15]. For
instance, speciation [28] and niching [29] are popular diversity maintenance techniques, which enforce local competition
among similar solutions. Similarity can be measured on the
genotypical level [5], on the fitness scores [6], or on the age of
the individuals [7]. Multiple promising directions are favoured
by this localised competition, making premature convergence
less likely. Alternatives such as coevolution [30] can lead to
an arms race that finds a better gradient for search, but can
suffer when individuals’ performance is poor or one individual
vastly outperforms others [31]. Finally, techniques from multiobjective optimisation can, at least in theory, explore the search
space more effectively by evaluating individuals in more than
one measures of quality [32] and thus avoid local optima in
one fitness function by attempting to improve other objectives;
however, multi-objective optimisation can not guarantee to
circumvent deception [33].
Divergent search methods differ from previous approaches
as they explicitly ignore the objective of the problem they are
trying to solve. While the approaches described above provide
control mechanisms, modifiers or alternate objectives which
complement the gradient search towards a better solution,
divergent algorithms such as novelty search [8] motivates
exploration of the search space by rewarding individuals
that are phenotypically (or behaviourally) different without
considering whether they are objectively “better” than others.
Novelty search is neither random walk nor exhaustive search,
however, as it gives higher rewards to solutions that are
different from others in the current and past populations
3
by maintaining a memory of the areas of the search space
it has explored via a novelty archive. The archive contains
previously found novel individuals, and the highest-scoring
individuals in terms of novelty are continuously added to it
as evolution carries on. The distance measure which assesses
“difference” is based on a behaviour characterization, which
is problem-dependent: for a maze navigation task, distance
may be calculated on the agents’ final positions or directions
[8], [17], for robot locomotion it may be on the position of
a robot’s centre of mass [8], for evolutionary art it may be
on properties of the images such as brightness and symmetry
[34].
C. Quality Diversity
A recent trend in evolutionary computation is inspired by
a species’ tendency to face a strong competition for survival
within its own niche [17]. EC algorithms of this type seek
for the discovery of both quality and diversity at the same
time, following the traditional approach within computational
creativity of seeking outcomes characterized by both quality
(or value) and novelty [13]. Such evolutionary algorithms
have been named quality diversity algorithms [17] and aim
to find a maximally diverse population of highly performing
individuals. Examples of such algorithms include novelty
search with local competition [35] and MAP-Elites [36] as
well as algorithms that constrain the feasible space of solutions
— thereby forcing high quality solutions — while searching
for divergence such as constrained novelty search [16], [37].
Surprise search can complement the search for diversity and
replace other divergent search algorithms commonly used for
quality diversity. It can, for instance, be used in combination
with local competition instead of novelty search as in [35].
Towards that goal, a recent study employed surprise search
for game weapon generation in a constrained fashion [38]. The
constrained surprise search algorithm rewarded the generation
of surprising weapons — thereby maintaining diversity — with
guaranteed high quality imposed by constraints on weapon
balance and effectiveness.
III. T HE N OTION OF S URPRISE S EARCH
This section examines the notion of surprise as a driver
of evolutionary search. To this end, we first describe the
concept of surprise, we then highlight the differences between
surprise and novelty and, finally, we frame surprise search in
the context of divergent search.
A. What is Surprise?
The study of surprise has been central in neuroscience, psychology, cognitive science, and to a lesser degree in computational creativity and computational search. In psychology and
emotive modelling studies, surprise defines one of Ekman’s
six basic emotions [39]. Within cognitive science, surprise
has been defined as a temporal-based cognitive process of
the unexpected [21], [40], a violation of a belief [41], a
reaction to a mismatch [21], or a response to novelty [14].
In computational creativity, surprise has been attributed to the
creative output of a computational process [14], [18].
While variant types and taxonomies of surprise have been
suggested in the literature — such as aggressive versus passive
surprise [18] — we can safely derive a definition of surprise
that is general across all disciplines that study surprise as
a phenomenon. For the purposes of this paper we define
surprise as the deviation from the expected and we use the
notions surprise and unexpectedness interchangeably due to
their highly interwoven nature.
B. Novelty vs. Surprise
Novelty and surprise are different notions by definition as
it is possible for a solution to be both novel and/or expected
to variant degrees. Following the core principles of Lehman
and Stanley [8] and Grace et al. [18], novelty is defined as the
degree to which a solution is different from prior solutions to
a particular problem. On the other hand, surprise is the degree
to which a solution is different from the expected solution to
a particular problem.
Expectations are naturally based on inference from past
experiences; analogously surprise is built on the temporal
model of past behaviours. To exemplify the difference between
the notions of novelty and surprise, [22] uses a card memory
game where cards are revealed, one at a time, to the player who
has to predict which card will be revealed next. The novelty of
game outcome (i.e. next card) is the highest if all past revealed
cards are different. The surprise value of the game outcome
in that case is low as the player has grown to expect a new,
unseen, card every time. On the other hand, if seen cards are
revealed after a while then the novelty of the game outcome
decreases, but surprise increases as the game deviates from
the expected behaviour which calls for a new card every time.
Surprise is a temporal notion as expectations are by nature
temporal. Prior information is required to predict what is
expected; hence a prediction of the expected [19] is a necessary
component for modelling surprise computationally. By that
logic, surprise can be viewed as a temporal novelty process
or as novelty on the prediction (rather than the behavioural)
space. Surprise search maintains a prediction (a gradient) of
where novelty has been on the prediction space, which is
derived from the behavioural space. In that sense surprise
resembles a time derivative of novelty.
C. Novelty Search vs. Surprise Search
According to Grace et al. [18], novelty and value (i.e.
objective in the context of EC) are not sufficient for the
discovery of unconventional solutions to problems (or creative
outputs) as novelty does not cater for the temporal aspects
of discovery. Novelty search rewards divergence from current
behaviours (i.e. other individuals of the population) and prior
behaviours (i.e. an archive of previously novel solutions) [8];
in this way it provides the necessary stepping stones toward
achieving an objective (i.e. value). Surprise, on the other hand,
complements the search for novelty as it rewards divergence
from the expected behaviour. In other words while novelty
search attempts to deviate from previously seen solutions,
surprise search attempts to deviate from solutions that are
expected to be seen in the future.
4
As discussed above, surprise search must reward an individual’s deviation from the expected behaviour. This goal can be
decomposed into two tasks: prediction and deviation. At the
highest descriptive level, surprise search uses local information
from past generations to predict behaviour(s) of the population
in the current generation; observing the behaviours of each
individual in the actual population, it rewards individuals that
deviate from predicted behaviour(s): this is summarized in
Fig. 1. The following sections will describe the models of
prediction and deviation, and the parameters which can affect
their behaviour.
Fig. 1: High-level overview of the surprise search algorithm
when evaluating an individual i in a population at generation
t. The h previous generations are considered, with respect
to k behavioural characteristics per generation, to predict the
expected k behaviours of generation t. The surprise score of
individual i is the deviation of the behaviour of i from a subset
of these k expected behaviours.
Highly relevant to this study is the work on computational
models of surprise for artificial agents [42], which however
does not consider using such a model of surprise for search.
Other aspects of unexpectedness such as intrinsic motivation
[43] and artificial curiosity [44] have also been modelled. The
concepts of novelty within reinforcement learning research
are also interlinked to the idea of surprise search [43], [45].
Artificial curiosity and intrinsic motivation differ from surprise
search as the latter is based on evolutionary divergent search
and motivated by open-ended evolution, similarly to novelty
search. Specifically, surprise search does not keep a persistent
world model as [44] does; instead it focuses on the current
trajectory of search using the latest points of the search space
it has explored (and ordering them temporally). Additionally,
it rewards deviations from expected behaviours agnostically
rather than based on how those deviations improve a world
model. This allows surprise search to backtrack and re-visit
areas of the search space it has already visited, which is
discouraged in both novelty search and curiosity.
Inspired by the above arguments and findings in computational creativity, we view surprise for computational search
as the degree to which expectations about a solution are
violated through observation [18]. Our hypothesis is that if
modelled appropriately, surprise may enhance divergent search
and complement or even surpass the performance of traditional
forms of divergent search such as novelty. The main findings
of this paper validate our hypothesis.
IV. T HE S URPRISE S EARCH A LGORITHM
This section discusses the principles of designing a surprise
search algorithm for any task or search space. To realise
surprise as a search mechanism, an individual should be
rewarded when it deviates from the expected behaviour, i.e. the
evaluation of a population in evolutionary search is adapted.
This means that surprise search can be applied to any EC
method, such as NEAT [28] in the case study of this paper.
A. Model of Prediction
As shown in Fig. 1, the predictive model uses local information from previous generations to estimate (in a quantitative
way) the expected behaviour(s) in the current population.
Formally, predicted behaviours (p) are created via eq. (1),
where m is the predictive model that uses a degree of local
(or global) behavioural information (expressed by k) from h
previous generations. Each parameter (m, h, k) may influence
the scope and impact of predictions, and are problem-specific
both from a theoretical (as they can affect performance of
surprise search) and a practical (as certain domains may limit
the possible choice of parameters) perspective.
p = m(h, k)
(1)
How much history of prior behaviours (h) should surprise search consider?: In order to predict behaviours in
the current population, the predictive model must consider
previous generations. In order to estimate behaviours of a
population at generation t, the predictive model must find
trends in the populations of generations t − 1, t − 2, · · · , t − h.
The minimum number of generations to consider in order
to observe an evolutionary trend, therefore, is h = 2 (the
two prior generations to the one being evaluated). However,
behaviours that have performed well in the past could also be
included in a surprise archive, similar to the novelty archive of
novelty search [8], and subsequently used to make predictions
of interesting future behaviours. Such a surprise archive would
serve as a more persistent history (h > 2) but considering
only the interesting historical behaviours rather than all past
behaviours.
How local (k) are the behaviours surprise search needs to
consider to make a prediction?: Surprise search can consider
behavioural trends of the entire population when creating a
prediction (global information). In that case, k = 1 and all
behaviours are aggregated into a meaningful average metric
for each prior generation. The current generation’s expected
behaviours are similarly expressed as a single (average) metric;
deviation of individuals in the actual population is derived
from that single metric. At the other extreme, surprise search
can consider each individual in the population and derive an
estimated behaviour based on the behaviours of its ancestors in
the genotypic sense (parents, grandparents etc.) or behavioural
sense (past individuals with the closest behaviour). In this case
k = P where P is the size of the population, and the number
of predictions to deviate from will similarly be P . Therefore,
5
the parameter k determines the level of prediction locality
which can vary from 1 to P ; intermediate values of k split
prior populations into a number of population groups using
problem-specific criteria and clustering methods.
What predictive model (m) should surprise search use?:
Any predictive modelling approach can be used to predict a future behaviour, such as a simple linear regression of a number
of points in the behavioural space, non-linear extrapolations,
or machine learned models. Again, we consider the predictive
model, m, to be problem-dependent and contingent on the h
and k parameters.
B. Model of Deviation
To put pressure on unexpected behaviours, we need an
estimate of the deviation of an observed behaviour from the
expected behaviour (if k = 1) or behaviours. Following the
principles of novelty search [8], this estimate is derived from
the behaviour space as the average distance to the n-nearest
expected behaviours (prediction points). The surprise score s
for an individual i in the population is calculated as:
n
s(i) =
1X
ds (i, pi,j )
n j=0
(2)
where ds is the domain-dependent measure of behavioural
difference between an individual and its expected behaviour,
pi,j is the j-closest prediction point (expected behaviour)
to individual i and n is the number of prediction points
considered; n is a problem-dependent parameter determined
empirically (n≤k).
C. Important notes
The evolutionary dynamics of surprise search are similar
to those achieved via novelty search. A temporal window of
where the search has been is maintained by looking at the prior
behaviours (expressed by h and k), which are used to make
a prediction of the expected behaviours. However, surprise
search works on a different search space (the prediction space)
which is orthogonal to the behavioural space used by novelty,
as it deviates from the expected and not from the actual behaviours. Therefore, a new form of divergent search emerges,
which looks at previous behaviours only in an implicit way
in order to derive the prediction space. A concern could be if
surprise search is merely a version of random walk, especially
considering that it deviates from predictions which can differ
from actual behaviours. Several comparative experiments in
section VII show that surprise search is different and far more
effective compared to various random benchmark algorithms.
The source code of the surprise search algorithm is publicly
available here1 .
V. M AZE NAVIGATION T EST B ED
Inspired by the work of Lehman and Stanley for testing
novelty search [8], we use a maze navigation problem as a
testbed for surprise search, as it particularly suits the definition
1 http://www.autogamedesign.eu/mazesurprisesearch
(a) Neural Network
(b) Sensors
Fig. 2: Robot controller for the maze navigation task. Fig. 2a
shows the network’s inputs and outputs. Fig. 2b shows the
layout of the sensors: the six black arrows are rangefinder
sensors, and the four blue pie-slice sensors act as a compass
towards the goal.
of deceptive problem. The maze navigation task is made of a
closed two-dimensional maze, which contains a start position
and a goal position: the navigation task has a deceptive
landscape—which is directly visible to a human observer—
due to the several local optima present in the search space
of the problem. Cul-de-sacs added in the shortest path to
the goal makes the problem more deceptive, as EC must
visiting positions with lower fitness scores before reaching
the goal, making the problem harder and more deceptive. In
this case, navigation is performed by virtual robot controllers
with sensors and mechanisms for controlling their direction
and speed: the mapping between the two is provided is via an
artificial neural network (ANN) evolved via neuroevolution of
augmenting topologies [28]. Starting from the mazes introduced in [8], we designed two additional mazes of enhanced
complexity and deceptiveness. This section briefly describes
the maze navigation problem, the four mazes adopted, and the
parameters for the experiment of Section VII.
A. The Maze Navigation Task
The maze navigation task consists of finding the path from
a starting point to a goal in a two-dimensional maze, in a
fixed number of simulation steps. The problem becomes harder
when mazes include dead-ends and the goal is far away from
the starting point. As in [8], the robot has six range sensors
to measure its distance from the closest obstacle, plus four
range radars that fire if the goal is in their arc (see Fig.
2b). Therefore, the robot’s ANN receives 10 inputs from the
sensors and it controls two actuators, i.e. whether to turn or
change the speed (see Fig. 2a). Evolving a controller able to
successfully navigate a maze is a challenging problem, as EC
needs to evolve a complex mapping between the input (sensors) and the output (movement) in an unknown environment.
Even if it can be considered a toy problem, it is an interesting
testbed as it stands for a general deceptive search space. Two
properties have made this environment a canonical test for
divergent search (e.g. [8], [17]): the ease of manually designing
deceptive mazes and the low computational burden, which
enables researchers to run multiple comparative tests among
6
(a) Medium
(b) Hard
(c) Very hard (d) Extremely hard
Fig. 3: The maze testbeds that appear in [8] (Fig. 3a and 3b)
and new mazes introduced in [46] and this paper (Fig. 3c
and 3d respectively). The filled circle is the robot’s starting
position and the empty circle is the goal. The maze size is
300×150 units for medium and 200×200 for the other mazes.
algorithms. Furthermore, the generality of the findings can be
tested with automatically generated mazes, as in Section VIII.
B. Mazes
This paper tests the performance of surprise search on four
mazes (see Fig. 3), two of which (medium and hard) have
been used in [8]. The medium maze (see Fig. 3a) is somewhat
challenging as an algorithm should evolve a robot that avoids
dead-ends placed alongside the path to the goal. The hard
maze (see Fig. 3b) is more deceptive, due to the dead-end at
the leftmost part of the maze; an algorithm must search in
less promising (less fit) areas of the maze to find the global
optimum. For these two mazes we follow the experimental
parameters set in [8] and consider a robot successful if it
manages to reach the goal within a radius of five units at
the end of an evaluation of 400 simulation steps.
Beyond the two mazes of [8], two additional mazes (very
hard and extremely hard) were designed to test an algorithm’s
performance in even more deceptive environments. The very
hard maze (see Fig. 3c) is a modification of the hard maze
introduced in [46] with more dead ends and winding passages.
The extremely hard maze is a new maze (see Fig. 3d) that
features a longer and more complex path from start to goal,
thereby increasing the deceptive nature of the problem.
If we define a maze’s complexity as the shortest path
between the start and the goal, complexity increases substantially from medium (240 units), to hard (360 units), to very
hard (442 units) and finally to the extremely hard maze (552
units); note that the last three mazes are of equal size. The
high problem complexity of the very hard and the extremely
hard mazes led us to empirically increase the number of
simulation steps for the evaluation of a robot to 500 and 1000
simulation steps, respectively. By increasing the simulation
time in the more deceptive mazes we manage to achieve
reasonable performances for at least one algorithm examined
which allows for a better analysis and comparison.
VI. A LGORITHM PARAMETERS FOR M AZE NAVIGATION
This section provides details about the general and specific
parameters for all the algorithms compared. We primarily test
the performance of three algorithms: objective search, novelty
search and surprise search, and include three baseline algorithms for comparative purposes. All algorithms use NEAT
to evolve a robot controller with the same parameters as in
[8], where the maze navigation task and the mazes of Fig. 3
were introduced. Evolution is carried on a population of 250
individuals for a maximum of 300 generations in the medium
and hard maze for a fair comparison to results obtained in [8].
However, the number of generations is increased to 1000 for
the more deceptive mazes (very hard and extremely hard) to
allow us to analyse the algorithms’ behaviour over a longer
evolutionary period. The NEAT algorithm uses speciation and
recombination, as described in [28]. The specific parameters
of all compared algorithms are detailed below.
A. Objective search
Objective search uses the agent’s proximity to the goal as
a measure of its fitness. Following [8], proximity is measured
as the Euclidean distance between the goal and the position
of the robot at the end of the simulation. This distance does
not account for the maze’s topology and walls, and can be
deceptive in the presence of dead-ends.
B. Novelty Search
Novelty search uses the same novelty metric and parameter
values as presented in [8]. In particular, the novelty metric
is the average distance of the robot from the nearest neighbouring robots among those in the current population and in a
novelty archive. Distance in this case is the Euclidean distance
between two robot positions at the end of the simulation; this
rewards robots ending in positions that no other robot has
explored yet. The parameter for the novelty archive (e.g. the
initial novelty threshold for inserting individuals to the archive
is 6) is as given in [8].
Sensitivity Analysis: While in [8] novelty is calculated
as the average distance from the 15 nearest neighbours, the
introduction of new mazes in this paper mandates that the
n parameter of novelty search is tested empirically. For that
purpose we vary n from 5 to 30 in increments of 5 across
all mazes and select the n values that yield the highest
number of maze solutions (successes) in 50 independent runs
of 300 generations for the medium and hard maze, and 1000
generations for the other mazes. If there is more than one
n value that yields the highest number of successes then the
lowest average evaluations to solve the maze is taken into
account as a selection criterion. Figure 5a shows the results
obtained by this analysis across all mazes.
The best results are indeed obtained with 15 nearest neighbours for the medium and hard maze, as in [8] (49 and 48
successes, respectively). In the very hard maze there is no
difference between 10 and 15 in terms of successes (39) but
n = 15 yields less evaluations, while in the extremely hard
maze n = 10 yields less evaluations and more successes (24)
than any other value tested. In summary, reported results in
Section VII use n = 15 for the medium, hard and very hard
maze, and n = 10 for the extremely hard maze.
C. Surprise search
Surprise search uses the surprise metric of eq. (2) to reward
unexpected behaviours. As with the other algorithms compared, behaviour in the maze navigation domain is expressed
Normalized Evaluations
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1 5 10 15 20 25 30
n
(a) Generation t − 2
(b) Generation t − 1
Normalized Evaluations
7
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240
k
(c) Generation t
Fig. 4: The key phases of the surprise search algorithm as
applied to the maze navigation domain. Surprise search uses a
history of two generations (h = 2) and 10 behavioural clusters
(k = 10) in this example. Cluster centroids and prediction
points are depicted as empty red (light gray in grayscale) and
solid blue (dark gray in grayscale) circles, respectively.
as the position of the robot at the end of a simulation. The
behavioural difference ds in eq. (2) is the Euclidean distance
between the robots’ final position and a considered prediction
point, p.
Following the general formulation of surprise in Section
IV-A, the prediction points are a function of a model m that
considers k local behaviours of h prior generations. In this
comparative study we use the simplest possible prediction
model (m) which is a one-step linear regression of two points
(h = 2) in the behavioural space. Thus, only the two previous
generations are considered when creating prediction points to
deviate from in the current generation (see Fig. 4). In the first
two generations the algorithm performs mere random search
due to a lack of prediction points.
The locality (k) of behaviours is determined by the number
of behavioural clusters in the population that is obtained by
running k-means on the final robot positions. The surprise
search algorithm applies k-means clustering at each generation
by seeding the initial configuration of the k centroids with
the centroids obtained in the previous generation; this seeding
process is omitted only in the first generation due to the lack of
earlier clusters. This way the algorithm is able to pair centroids
in subsequent generations and track their behavioural history.
Using the k pairs of centroids of the last two generations, the
algorithm creates k prediction points for the current generation
through a simple linear projection. Surprise search rewards the
behaviour that obtains a surprising outcome given the temporal
sequence of the final points of the robot across generations.
Surprise search is thus orthogonal to objective and novelty
search as it rewards robots that visit areas outside the predicted
space(s), without any explicit knowledge of the final goal.
It should be noted that for high values of k the k-means
algorithm might end up not assigning any data point to a
particular cluster; the chance of this happening increases with
k and the sparseness of data (in particular in datasets containing outliers) [47]. Further, the seeding initialization procedure
we follow for k-means in this domain aims to behaviourally
connect centroids across generations so as to enable us to
predict and deviate from the expected behaviour in the next
generation. The adopted initialization procedure (i.e. inheriting
from centroids of the previous generation) does not guarantee
(a) Novelty search parameters
(b) Surprise search parameters
Fig. 5: Sensitivity Analysis: selecting n for novelty search
(Fig. 5b), k and n for surprise search (Fig. 5a). Figures depict
the average number of evaluations (normalized by the total
number of evaluations) obtained out of 50 runs . Error bars
represent the 95% confidence interval.
that all seeded centroids will be allocated a robot position
during the assignment step of k-means, as robot positions (data
points) might change drastically from one generation to the
next. In the case of surprise search, when an empty cluster
appears in the current generation (i.e. in positions where a
cluster existed in a past generation but not currently), then
its prediction is not updated (i.e. moved) until a final robot
position gets close to the empty cluster’s centroid. Predicted
centroids that have not been recently updated (due to empty
clusters) are still considered when calculating the surprise
score, and indirectly act as an archive of earlier predictions.
However, this archive is not persistent as the number of
‘archived’ prediction points can increase or decrease during
the course of evolution, and depends on k.
Sensitivity Analysis: To choose appropriate parameters for
k (information locality) and n (number of prediction points) in
the prediction and deviation models respectively, a sensitivity
analysis is conducted for all mazes. We obtain k empirically
by varying its value between 20 and P in increments of 20
for each maze. We also test all k for n = 1 and n = 2 in
this paper. As in the sensitivity analysis for novelty search we
select the k and n values that yield the highest number of
successes in 50 independent runs. If there is more than one
k, n combination that yields the highest number of successes
we select the combination that solves the maze in the fewest
average evaluations.
Figure 5b shows the average number of evaluations for all
k values tested, for n = 1 and n = 2. It is clear that higher
k values result to less evaluations on average. Moreover, it
seems that n = 2 leads to better performance in the two more
deceptive mazes. Based on the above selection criteria, we
pick k = 200 and n = 1 for the medium maze, which gives
the highest number of successes (50) and the lowest number
of evaluations (16, 364 evaluations on average). For the hard
maze we select k = 100 and n = 1, as it is the most robust (49
success) and fastest (23, 214 evaluations on average) among
tested values. Following the same procedure k = 200 and
n = 2 in the very hard maze, and k = 220 and n = 2 in the
extremely hard maze (see Fig. 5b).
300
280
260
240
220
200
1800 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
3
Average Maximum Fitness
In this paper we started our investigations with the simplest
possible prediction model (m), which is a linear regression,
and the shortest possible time window of two generations for
the history parameter (h). The impact of the history parameter
and the prediction model on the algorithm’s performance is not
examined empirically in this paper and remains open to future
investigations. We get back to this discussion in Section IX.
Average Maximum Fitness
8
The robot maze navigation problem is used to compare
the performance of surprise, novelty and objective search.
To test the algorithms’ performance, we follow the approach
proposed in [48] and compare their efficiency and robustness
in all four test bed mazes. We finally analyse some typical
examples on both the behavioural and the genotypical space
of the generated solutions. All results reported are obtained
from 100 independent evolutionary runs; reported significance
and corresponding p values are obtained via two-tailed MannWhitney U-test, with a significance level of 5%.
A. Efficiency
Efficiency is defined as the maximum fitness over time,
where fitness is calculated as 300 − d(i); d(i) the Euclidean
distance between the final position of robot i and the goal,
as in [8]. Figure 6 shows the average maximum fitness across
evaluations for each approach for the four mazes.
In the medium maze, we can observe that both surprise
and novelty search converge after approximately 35,000 evaluations. Even if novelty seems to yield a higher average
maximum fitness values than surprise search, the difference
is insignificant. Novelty search, on average, obtains a final
maximum fitness of 295.84 (σ = 1.47), while surprise
search obtains a fitness of 295.93 (σ = 0.72); p > 0.05.
By looking at the 95% confidence intervals, it seems that
novelty search yields higher average maximum fitness between
240
220
200
1800 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
3
Average Maximum Fitness
300
280
260
240
220
200
1800
25
50
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Evaluations (x103 )
(c) Very hard maze
(b) Hard maze
Average Maximum Fitness
(a) Medium maze
D. Other baseline algorithms
VII. S URPRISE S EARCH IN AUTHORED D ECEPTIVE M AZES
260
Evaluations (x10 )
Evaluations (x10 )
Three more baseline algorithms are included for comparative purposes. Random search is a baseline proposed in [8]
that uses a uniformly-distributed random value as the fitness
function of an individual. The other two baselines are variants
of surprise search that test the impact of the predictive model.
Surprise search (random), SSr , selects k random prediction
points (pi,j in eq. 2) within the maze following a uniform
distribution, and tests how surprise search would perform
with a highly inaccurate predictive model. Surprise search (no
prediction), SSnp , uses the current generation’s actual clusters
as its prediction points (pi,j in eq. 2), thereby, omitting the
prediction phase of the surprise search algorithm. SSnp uses
real data (cluster centroids) from the current generation rather
than predicted data regarding the current generation, and tests
how the algorithm performs divergent search from real data.
Note that SSnp is reminiscent of novelty search, except that
it uses deviation from cluster centroids (not points) and does
not use a novelty archive. The same parameter values (k and
n) are used for these variants of surprise search.
300
280
300
280
260
240
220
200
1800
25
50
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Evaluations (x103 )
(d) Extremely hard maze
Fig. 6: Efficiency (average maximum fitness) comparison for
the four mazes in Fig. 3. The graphs depict the evolution of
fitness over the number of evaluations. Values are averaged
across 100 runs of each algorithm and the error bars represent
the 95% confidence interval of the average.
7500 and 25,000 evaluations. This difference is due to the
predictions that surprise search tries to deviate from. Early
during evolution, two consecutive generations may have robots
far from each other, lead to distant and erratic predictions.
Eventually, we have a convergence and the predictions become
more consistent, allowing surprise search to solve the maze.
Both objective search and SSnp seem fairly efficient to solve
the maze; however, they are not able to find the goal in all the
runs. The random baselines, instead, perform poorly and show
very little improvement as evolution progresses. The baselines’
performance proves that surprise search is different from a
random walk and that the prediction model positively affects
the performance of the algorithm.
In a more deceptive test, the hard maze, we can see from
Fig. 6b that novelty and surprise perform much better than all
other algorithms; differences in efficiency between novelty and
surprise search are not significant. Surprise search and novelty
search find the goal in 99 and 93 out of 100 runs respectively,
SSnp finds the solution in 61 runs, while for the rest of the
baselines the success rate is far below. It is interesting to note
that objective search reaches a high fitness score around 260
at the very beginning of the evolutionary process, and then it
stops to improve. This is due to the dead-end at the upper right
corner of the maze (Fig. 3b), which prevents the algorithm
from discovering the global optimum. In order to discover the
global optimum, in fact, the algorithm needs to explore the
least fit areas of the search space, such as the bottom-right
corner of the maze.
In the very hard maze, objective search never finds the
100
80
80
Successes
100
60
40
20
60
40
20
00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
3
00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75
3
Evaluations (x10 )
Evaluations (x10 )
(a) Medium maze
(b) Hard maze
100
100
80
80
Successes
Successes
solution in 100 runs; Fig. 6c shows that this algorithm is
not able to reach the goal because, as in the hard maze, it
reaches the left-most dead end and is unable to bypass that
local optimum. Unsurprisingly, the random and SSR baselines
also perform poorly. On the other hand, novelty search finds
the solution in 85 out of 100 runs, while surprise search finds
a solution in 99 runs. Interestingly, SSnp finds 88 solutions out
of 100 runs, similar to novelty search. This can be explained
by looking at how SSnp is implemented. Its behaviour is
quite similar to novelty search as it merely uses the local
behaviours of the current generation; the key difference is that
these behaviours are clustered in SSnp . In such a complex
maze surprise search seems to handle maze deceptiveness in
a better way; it obtains a final maximum fitness of 295.77
(σ = 3.59) which is higher (but not significantly) than that
of novelty search (292.15; σ = 9.85); p > 0.05. From the
confidence intervals of Fig. 7c, it appears that surprise search
is performing better or significantly better than novelty search
after 50, 000 evaluations until the end of the run.
In the most deceptive (extremely hard) maze, objective
search, random and SSr do not find any solution in 100 runs,
performing poorly in terms of efficiency. This is not surprising
as all of these algorithms perform consistently poorly in all but
the simplest mazes. Novelty search and surprise search find the
solution 48 and 67 times, respectively, while the SSnp obtains
39 solutions. As can be seen in Fig. 6d, surprise search yields
a higher maximum fitness after 150,000 evaluations, with a
final maximum fitness of 287.68 (σ = 12.16).
Another way of estimating efficiency is the effort it takes
an algorithm to find a solution. In this case, surprise clearly
manages to be more advantageous. In the medium maze
surprise search manages to find the goal, on average, in
16, 084 evaluations (σ = 11, 588) which is faster than novelty (19, 814; σ = 15, 441) and significantly faster than
objective search (48, 186; σ = 23, 590) and SSnp (26, 452;
σ = 21, 249). We observe the same comparative advantage in
the hard maze as surprise search solves the problem in 23, 566
evaluations on average (σ = 15, 925) whereas novelty search,
SSnp , and objective search solve it in 28, 493 (σ = 19, 939),
47, 550 (σ = 25, 524) and 73, 643 (σ = 7, 542) evaluations,
respectively. Most importantly surprise search is significantly
faster (p < 0.05) than novelty search in the more deceptive
problems: on average surprise search finds the solution in
76, 261 evaluations (σ = 52, 385) in the very hard maze and
in 154, 794 evaluations (σ = 84, 733) in the extremely hard
maze, whereas novelty search requires 115, 600 evaluations
(σ = 81, 091) and 178, 045 evaluations (σ = 86, 410),
respectively. Furthermore surprise search is significantly faster
(p < 0.01) than SSnp , which requires 117, 560 (σ = 74, 430)
and 200, 190 (σ = 75, 569) evaluations in the very hard and
the extremely hard maze, respectively.
The findings from the above experiments indicate that, in
terms of maximum fitness obtained, surprise search is comparable to novelty search and far more efficient than objective
search in deceptive domains. We can further argue that the
deviation from the predictions (which are neither random
nor omitted) is beneficial for surprise search as indicated by
the performances of SSr and SSnp . The performance of this
Successes
9
60
40
40
20
20
00
60
25
50
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Evaluations (x103 )
(c) Very hard maze
00
25
50
75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250
Evaluations (x103 )
(d) Extremely hard maze
Fig. 7: Robustness comparison for the four mazes in Fig. 3.
The graphs depict the evolution of algorithm successes in
solving the maze problem over the number of evaluations.
baseline appears to be similar to novelty search, especially in
harder mazes; this is not surprising as SSnp is conceptually
similar to novelty search, as noted in Section VI-D. It is also
clear that, on average, surprise search finds the solution faster
than any other algorithm in all mazes.
B. Robustness
Robustness is defined as the number of successes obtained
by the algorithm across time (i.e. evaluations). In Figure 7
we compare the robustness of each approach across the four
mazes, collected from 100 runs. In the medium maze (Fig.
7a), surprise search is more successful than novelty search in
the first 20,000 evaluations; moreover, surprise search finds,
on average, the 100 solutions in fewer evaluations compared
to the other approaches. As noticed in the previous section, in
the first 20,000 evaluations novelty search has a comparable
or higher efficiency in Fig. 6a; this points to the fact that
while some individuals in surprise search manage to reach the
goal, others do not get as close to it as in novelty search.
On the other hand, objective search fails to find the goal
in 29 runs, because of the several dead-ends present in this
maze. The control algorithm SSnp finds the goal 93 times
out of 100, but it’s slower compared to novelty and surprise
search. Few solutions are found by the baseline random search
and SSr , and they are significantly slower than the other
approaches. Fig. 7b shows that, in the hard maze, novelty
search attains more successes than surprise search in the first
10,000 evaluations but the opposite is true for the remainder
of the evolutionary progress. As in the previous maze, this
behaviour is not reflected in the efficiency graph (Fig. 6b): this
10
can be explained by how surprise search evolves individuals,
as they change their distance to the goal more abruptly, while
novelty search evolves behaviours in smooth incremental steps.
On the other hand, SSnp finds fewer solutions in this maze,
62 out of 100. Finally, the deceptive properties of this maze
are exemplified by the poor performance of objective search
and the two random baselines.
The capacity of surprise search is more evident in the very
hard maze (see Fig. 7c) where the difference in terms of
robustness becomes even larger between surprise and novelty
search. While in the first 50,000 evaluations novelty and
surprise search attain a comparable number of successes, the
performance of surprise search is boosted for the remainder
of the evolutionary run. Ultimately, surprise search solves
the very hard maze in 99 out of 100 times in just 160,000
evaluations whereas novelty search manages to obtain 85
solutions by the end of the 250,000 evaluations. With 88
solutions out of 100, SSnp performs similarly to novelty search
in this maze but is generally slower compared to surprise
search. Objective search and the two random baselines, as
expected, do not succeed in solving the maze.
Similarly, in the extremely hard maze (see Fig. 7d) the
benefits of surprise search over the other algorithms are quite
apparent. While surprise and novelty obtain a similar number
of successes in the first 100,000 evaluations, surprise search
obtains more successes in the remaining evaluations of the run.
At the end of 250,000 evaluations in the most deceptive map
examined, surprise search finds solutions in 67 runs versus
48 runs of novelty search. SSnp finds 39 solutions and it is
generally slower than novelty and surprise search. As in the
very hard maze, the remaining algorithms fail to find a single
solution to this maze.
C. Analysis
As an additional comparison between surprise and novelty
search, we study the behavioural and genotypical characteristics of these two approaches. The behavioural space is
presented in a number of typical runs collected from the four
mazes, while the genotypical space is inspected through the
metrics computed from the final ANNs evolved by these two
algorithms. Objective search and the other baselines are not
further analysed in this section to emphasise on comparisons
between surprise and novelty search.
1) Behavioural Space: Typical Examples: Table I shows
pairs of typical surprise and novelty search runs for each
of the four mazes; in all examples illustrated the maze is
solved at different number of evaluations as indicated at the
captions of the images. The typical runs are shown as heatmaps
which represent the aggregated distribution of the robots’ final
positions throughout all evaluations. Moreover, we report the
entropy (H) of those positions as a measure of the populations’
spatial diversity in the maze. Surprise search seems to explore
more uniformly the space, as revealed by the final positions
depicted in the heatmaps. The corresponding H values further
support this claim, especially in the more deceptive mazes.
2) Genotypic Space: Table II contains a set of metrics that
characterize the final ANNs evolved by surprise and novelty
search obtained from all four mazes, which quantify aspects
of genomic complexity and genomic diversity. For genomic
complexity we consider the number of connections and the
number of hidden nodes of the final ANNs evolved, while
genomic diversity is measured as the average pairwise distance
of the final ANNs evolved. This distance is computed with
the compatibility metric, a linear combination of disjoint and
excess genes and weight difference, as defined in [28]. As
noted in [8], novelty search tends to evolve simpler networks in
terms of connections when compared to objective search. Surprise search, on the other hand, seems to generate significantly
more densely connected ANNs than novelty search (based on
the number of connections). It also evolves slightly larger
ANNs than novelty search (based on the number of hidden
nodes). Most importantly, surprise search yields population
diversity — as expressed by the compatibility metric [8] —
that is significantly higher than novelty search. This difference
seems to be mostly due to the disjoint factor, which counts
the number of mismatching genes between two genomes,
depending on whether their genes are within the innovation
numbers of the other genome [28]. This suggests that ANNs
evolved with surprise search are more diverse in terms of evolutionary history. In the more deceptive mazes, differences in
genomic complexity and diversity become significantly larger.
In the very hard maze the average number of connections for
surprise search grows to 101.94 (σ = 52.45) while novelty
search evolves ANNs with 42.03 connections (σ = 14.53),
on average; the number of hidden nodes used by surprise
search is significantly larger (6.94; σ = 3.62) compared to
novelty search. Moreover the diversity metric (compatibility)
is around three times that of novelty search. A similar trend can
be noticed in the extremely hard maze, where again surprise
search evolves denser, larger and more diverse ANNs. As
mentioned earlier, handling more complex and larger ANNs
has a direct impact on the computational cost of surprise
search since it takes more time to simulate new networks
across generations. It should be noted that creating larger
networks does not imply that this behaviour is beneficial, it is
however an indication that surprise search operates differently
to novelty search.
VIII. S URPRISE S EARCH IN G ENERATED M AZES
In the previous sections we showed the power of surprise
search in four selected instances of deceptive problems. While
surprise search outperforms novelty and objective search both
in terms of efficiency and robustness in four human-designed
mazes, an important concern is whether these results are
general enough across a broader set of problems.
In order to assess how surprise search generalises in any
maze navigation task, we follow the methodology presented
in [49] and test the performance of surprise, novelty and
objective search as well as the baselines across numerous
mazes generated through an automated process. Moreover,
the parameters of k and n which were fine-tuned for the
problem at hand in each maze of Section VII are now kept the
same, enabling us to observe if a particular parameter setup
for surprise search can perform well in unseen problems of
varying complexity.
11
TABLE I: Behavioural Space. Typical successful runs solved after a number of evaluations (E) across the four mazes examined.
Heatmaps illustrate the aggregated numbers of final robot positions across all evaluations. Note that white space in the maze
indicates that no robot visited
that position. The entropy (H ∈ [0, 1]) of visited positions is also reported and is calculated as
P
follows: H = (1/logC) i {(vi /V )log(vi /V )}; where vi is the number of robot visits in a position i, V is the total number
of visits and C is the total number of discretized positions (cells) considered in the maze.
Medium Maze
(E = 25, 000)
Novelty
Surprise
H = 0.63
H = 0.67
Hard Maze
(E = 25, 000)
Novelty
Surprise
H = 0.61
H = 0.67
Very Hard Maze
(E = 75, 000)
Novelty
Surprise
H = 0.63
H = 0.69
Extremely Hard Maze
(E = 75, 000)
Novelty
Surprise
H = 0.64
H = 0.68
TABLE II: Genotypic Space. Metrics of genomic complexity and diversity of the final ANNs evolved using NEAT, averaged
across successful runs. Values in parentheses denote standard deviations.
Maze
Medium
Hard
Very Hard
Extremely Hard
Algorithm
Surprise
Novelty
Surprise
Novelty
Surprise
Novelty
Surprise
Novelty
Genomic Complexity
Connections
Hidden Nodes
33.76 (15.08)
2.46 (1.53)
29.08 (6.10)
2.2 (1.0)
52.34 (28.57)
3.84 (2.66)
32.55 (9.84)
2.48 (1.29)
101.94 (52.45)
6.94 (3.62)
42.03 (14.53)
3.27 (1.90)
158.16 (89.65)
10.63 (5.85)
41.79 (11.77)
3.25 (1.53)
Compatibility
42.52 (19.80)
32.55 (7.90)
73.24 (36.82)
39.35 (12.05)
160.31 (67.01)
56.53 (19.66)
260.52 (113.08)
54.05 (14.44)
Genomic Diversity
Disjoint
Weight Difference
27.40 (16.27)
1.22 (0.25)
24.97 (7.05)
1.09 (0.26)
51.60 (27.76)
1.25 (0.24)
31.06 (11.32)
1.19 (0.28)
121.56 (57.11)
1.26 (0.22)
46.65 (19.25)
1.16 (0.27)
207.97 (107.2)
1.31 (0.23)
45.30 (14.55)
1.15 (0.24)
Excess
11.44 (11.45)
4.28 (3.41)
17.86 (20.99)
4.71 (4.66)
34.96 (37.34)
6.38 (7.71)
48.62 (54.20)
5.28 (4.93)
A. Experiment Description
To compare the capabilities in navigation policies of surprise, novelty and objective search in increasingly complex
maze problems, we test their performance against 60 randomly
generated mazes. These mazes are created by a recursive
division algorithm [50], which starts from an empty maze and
divides it into two areas by adding a vertical or a horizontal
wall with a randomly located hole in it. This process is
repeated until no areas can be further subdivided, because
doing so would make the maze untraversable or because a
maximum number of subdivisions is reached. In this experiment, the starting position and the ending position of the
maze have been fixed in the lower left and upper right corner
respectively, while the generated mazes have a number of
subdivisions chosen randomly between 2 and 6. These values
have been chosen empirically to avoid generating mazes that
are too easy (solvable by all three methods in few generations)
or impossible to solve (because of too many subdivisions).
Examples of the mazes generated are shown in Fig. 8. The
parameters of surprise search and novelty search are fixed
based on well-performing setups with mazes of Section VII:
surprise search uses k = 200 and n = 2 (used in the very
hard maze) and novelty uses n = 15 (used in medium, hard
and very hard mazes). Each generated maze was tested 50
times for each of three methods, measuring the number of
successes (i.e. once the agent reaches the goal) in each maze.
The number of simulation timesteps is set to 200 and the
number of generations to 600.
2 subdivisions 3 subdivisions 4 subdivisions 5 subdivisions 6 subdivisions
Fig. 8: Maze generator: Sample generated mazes (200x200
units) created via recursive division, showing the starting
location (black circle) and the goal location (white circle).
B. Results
As a first analysis on the results obtained on the 60 mazes,
we focus on which of the evolutionary approaches finds strictly
more successes. Table III shows that surprise search has more
successes than novelty search in 40% of mazes, while novelty
achieves more successes than surprise search in 8% of the
generated mazes. Comparing the results of these two approaches against objective search, surprise search outperforms
objective search in more mazes (56%) than novelty search
(40%). If we look at the baselines, SSnp reaches comparable
performance to novelty search, but surprise search remains the
most successful algorithm, as it outperforms SSnp in 45%
of the considered mazes. Finally, SSr and random search
evidently perform poorly compared to the other approaches.
An important question to put to the test is how novelty
search and surprise search perform with respect to maze
deceptiveness. Intuitively, we can say that the deceptiveness
(or difficulty) of the maze can be determined by the number
of successes obtained by objective search: the more deceptive
12
Fig. 9: Linear regression:
relation between the failures
of objective search and successes of surprise and novelty search.
Fig. 10: Robustness: algorithm successes in solving
all the generated mazes over
the number of evaluations
for each considered method.
the maze, the more often objective search would fail to find
a solution. Figure 9 shows the number of successes obtained
by novelty and surprise search against the number of failures
obtained by objective search. Unsurprisingly, surprise search
and novelty search find mazes where objective search failed
more difficult as well, since their successes are highly correlated with the failures of objective search (adjusted R2 > 0.85
for each method, p < 0.001). Looking at the trends of the
linear regression lines, surprise search constantly achieves a
greater number of successes, based on the intercept values of
the linear regression models which are significantly different
according to an ANCOVA test (p < 0.05). Based on the angle
of the linear regression line, it also seems that surprise search
scales better for more deceptive mazes.
As a final analysis, we report the robustness obtained by
aggregating all the runs of the 60 generated mazes for each
approach, i.e. a total of 3000 runs. From Fig. 10 we can
observe that surprise search is faster, on average, than novelty
and objective search in reaching the goal from 112, 500
evaluations onward (p < 0.05). Surprise, novelty and objective
search require on average 71, 865 (σ = 63, 007), 76, 225
(σ = 64, 961) and 84, 398 (σ = 65, 081) evaluations for each
success, respectively. As Fig. 10 shows, some maze problems
are easy to solve as all three methods fare similarly in the
first 20, 000 evaluations but as the problems become more
complex, surprise and novelty search become faster than objective search and eventually surprise search surpasses novelty
search in terms of successes. Furthermore, surprise search
shows a significant improvement compared to its baseline
variants. Respectively, SSnp , SSr and random search obtain
75, 531 (σ = 63, 820), 118, 668 (σ = 53934) and 123, 558
(σ = 50, 568) evaluations; all results are significantly different
from the performance of surprise search (p < 0.05).
IX. D ISCUSSION
This paper identified the notion of surprise, i.e. deviation
from expectations, as an alternative measure of divergence to
the notion of novelty and presented a general framework for
incorporating surprise in evolutionary search in Section IV. In
order to highlight the differences between surprise search and
other divergent search techniques (such as novelty search) or
baselines (such as random search or search with inaccurate
predictions), an experiment in the robot maze navigation
testbed was carried out and comparisons between algorithms
were made on several dimensions. The key findings of these
experiments suggest that surprise search yields comparable
efficiency to novelty search and it outperforms objective
search. Moreover it finds solutions faster and more often than
any other algorithm considered. In a broader range of mazes,
generated via recursive subdivision, surprise search was also
shown to be more robust and generalise well, as it had more
successes than novelty search in 40% of generated mazes.
The comparative advantages of surprise search over novelty
search are inherent to the way the algorithm searches, attempting to deviate from predicted unseen behaviours instead of
prior seen behaviours. Compared to novelty search, surprise
search may also deviate from expected behaviours that exist
in areas that have been visited in the past by the algorithm.
The novelty archive operates in a similar fashion; however
it contains positions (instead of prediction points) and these
positions are always considered for the calculation of the novelty score. In surprise search, instead, the prediction points are
derived from clusters that characterise areas in the behavioural
space.
The findings in the maze navigation experiments show
a clear difference between novelty and surprise, both behaviourally and genotypically. Surprise search has greater
exploratory capabilities, which are more obvious in later
generations. Surprise search also creates genotypically diverse
populations, with larger and denser ANNs. It is likely this
combination of diverse populations, larger and denser networks and a higher spatial diversity that gives surprise search
its advantage over novelty search.
Finally, the comparative analysis of surprise search against
random search suggests that surprise search is not random
search. Clearly it outperforms random search in efficiency
and robustness. Furthermore, the poor performance of the
two surprise search variants — employing random predictions
and omitting predictions — suggests that the prediction of
expected behaviour is beneficial for divergent search.
By now we have enough evidence for the benefits of surprise
search and enough findings suggesting that surprise search is
a different and more robust algorithm compared to novelty
search in this domain. Furthermore, through our analysis, we
have identified qualitative characteristics of the algorithm that
gave us critical insights on the way the algorithm operates.
However, we still lack empirical evidence on the reasons the
algorithm manages to perform that well compared to other
divergent search algorithms. An intuition by the anonymous
reviewers of a previous paper about the comparative benefits
of surprise search is that the algorithm allows search to revisit
areas in the behavioural space. Such a behaviour, in contrast,
is penalised in novelty search. This difference in how the two
algorithms operate leads to the assumption that surprise search
is more willing to revisit points in the behaviour space —
in a form of backtracking or cyclical manner. As a result
of this shifting selection pressure in the behavioural space
a different strategy is adopted every time a particular area
is revisited as each time the ANN controller is different and
potentially larger. Such an algorithmic behaviour appears to
be beneficial for search and might explain why ANNs get
significantly larger in surprise search.
13
TABLE III: Successes: Percentage of generated mazes for which the algorithm in the row has a strictly greater number of
successes than the algorithm in the column. The last row and the last column are respectively the average of each column and
the average of each row.
Objective
Novelty
Surprise
SSnp
SSr
Random
Total
Objective
40
56
51
1
0
29.6
Novelty
15
40
35
1
0
19
Surprise
5
8
11
1
0
5
More importantly than a performance comparison between
algorithms, however, is the introduction of surprise as a drive
for divergent search. As will be discussed in Section X, the
general framework of surprise search can be used with other
behaviour characterizations and in other domains. Moreover,
while some properties such as the model of prediction are
inherent to surprise search, properties such as the clustering
of behaviours as well as findings regarding the ability of
surprise search to backtrack can be re-used in other divergent
search algorithms; examples include a variant of novelty
search which considers neighboring cluster centroids rather
than neighboring individuals in the behavioural space, or a
novelty archive which is pruned (and reduces in size) over time
to allow backtracking. We can only hypothesise that the way
surprise search operates may result in increased evolvability
[51], which is an individual’s capacity to generate future
phenotypic variation, or alternatively, the potential for further
evolution. Naturally, all these hypotheses need to be tested
empirically in future studies as outlined in the next section.
SSnp
6
20
45
1
0
16.5
SSr
71
75
78
78
20
62.8
Generation t − 2
Random
78
81
85
85
36
71.8
Total
35
44.8
60.8
52
8
4
-
Generation t − 1
Generation t
Fig. 11: Behaviour Characterization: The key phases of
the surprise search algorithm on the maze navigation task,
characterizing behaviour via 200 samples of robot positions
over time. Surprise search uses a history of two generations
(h = 2) and 10 clusters (k = 10) in this example (for the sake
of visualization, only one cluster is shown). Robot trails are
depicted as green lines. Cluster centroids in generations t − 2
and t−1 as well as their predictions are depicted, respectively,
as red, dark red and blue lines.
X. E XTENSIONS AND F UTURE W ORK
While this study already offers evidence for the advantages
of surprise as a form of divergent search, further work on
several directions needs to be performed.
Behaviour Characterization: The surprise search algorithm currently characterises a behaviour merely as a point (i.e.
the final robot position on the maze after the simulation time
elapses). While such a decision was made in order to compare
our findings against the initial results of [8], we currently have
no evidence suggesting that surprise search would be able to
generalise well in behaviours that are characterised by higher
dimensions (e.g. a robot trail). To envision the behaviour of
surprise search in a high dimensional space, Fig. 11 shows a
possible implementation for surprise search with robot trails,
sampled over time. Following the implementation described in
Section VI-C, we show the three key phases of the algorithm:
the robots’ trails are clustered at generation t − 2 via kmeans (see Fig. 11a), then at generation t − 1 we seed the
clustering algorithm with the ones computed in the previous
generation and we find the new trajectories’ centroids (Fig.
11b). Finally the prediction at generation t is computed via
linear interpolation of each point on the computed (centroid)
trajectories at generations t−2 and t−1 (Fig. 11c). Preliminary
experiments have shown that predictions of robot trails do
not affect the performance of surprise search compared to
results in this paper; future studies, however, should investigate
Ht−2 at generation t−2 Ht−1 at generation t−1
Ht at generation t
Fig. 12: Deviation: Surprise search using heatmaps, at generation t. The first two heatmaps are computed in the last two
generations by using the final robot positions, Ht−2 and Ht−1 .
Using linear interpolation, the difference Ht−1 − Ht−2 is
computed and applied to Ht−1 to derive the predicted current
population’s Ht . The surprise score penalizes a robot if its
position (green point) is on a high concentration cell on the
predicted heatmap Ht .
the impact of higher dimensional behaviours across several
domains, especially on how they affect the predictive model
of the algorithm.
Deviation: The current algorithm allows for any degree and
type of deviation from the expected behaviour. Inspired by
novelty search, this paper only investigated a linear deviation
from expectations — i.e. the further a behaviour is from the
prediction the better. There exist, however, several ways of
computing deviation in a non-linear or probabilistic fashion,
e.g. as per [18]. In a maze navigation environment for instance,
14
we can alternatively consider a non-distance-based deviation
by using heatmaps of the chosen behaviour characterization.
Figure 12 shows the key phases of this implementation: in
generation t − 2 and t − 1 we compute the heatmaps Ht−2
and Ht−1 which map the final positions of all robots (k = 1),
and we use a linear interpolation to compute the predicted
heatmap at generation t. The surprise score is then computed
by mapping the individual’s position on the predicted heatmap:
1 − Ht (x, y), where x, y is the final position of the robot
mapped onto the heatmap.
Complexity and generality: To a degree, the experiment
with 60 generated mazes tests how generalizable surprise
search is without explicit parameter tuning. Since results from
that experiment indicated that surprise search scales better to
more deceptive problems, we need to further test the algorithm’s potential within the maze navigation domain through
more deceptive and complex environments. The capacity of
surprise search will then need to be tested in other domains
such as robot locomotion or procedural content generation. As
an example, the potential of surprise search has been explored
for the generation of unexpected weapons in a first person
shooter game [38]. In that work, the considered behaviour
characterization is a weapon tester agent’s death location:
as we have described above, we can employ a heatmap as
a probability distribution of the population’s behaviour and
predict the next generation’s heatmap by means of linear
interpolation of each singular cell. Surprise search has shown
its capacity to generate feasible and diverse content, thereby
achieving quality diversity.
Surprise search has also been successfully implemented to
evolve soft robot morphologies [52] constrained by a fixed
lattice. The goal of this experiment is to create robots able
to travel as far as possible from a starting position, within a
number of simulation steps. In this task, surprise search was
shown to be as efficient as novelty search; moreover, it evolved
more diverse morphologies. When computing behavioural
distance for this problem, the surprise score is computed
by predicting an entire robot trace in all simulation steps,
based on past behaviours (traces). This further supports the
claim that surprise is unaffected by the dimensionality of the
behaviour characterization. The experiments presented in this
paper, in [38] and [52] already demonstrate the generalizability
of surprise search across three rather diverse domains: maze
navigation, game content generation and robot design.
Model of expected behaviour: When it comes to designing
a model of expected behaviour there are two key aspects
that need to be considered: how much prior information the
model requires and how is that information used to make
a prediction. In this paper the prediction of behaviour is
based on the simplest form of 1-step predictions via a linear
regression. This simple predictive model shows the capacity of
surprise search given its performance advantages over novelty
search. However we can envision that better results can be
achieved if machine learned or non-linear predicted models
are built on more prior information (h > 2). A possible
way of considering more extensive history is to apply linear
interpolation of past centroids over time. It is thus possible
to compute a 3-dimensional line over the three dimensions
considered (x, y, t) and compute the next predicted position
over the line by taking the interpolated position at generation
t. Linear regression can be easily replaced by a quadratic or
cubic regression or even an artificial neural network model or
a support vector machine.
Prediction locality of surprise search: The algorithm
presented in this paper allows for various degrees of prediction
locality. We define prediction locality as the amount of local
information considered by surprise search to make a prediction. This is expressed by k which is left as a variable for the
algorithm designer. Prediction locality can be derived from the
behavioural space (as in this paper) but also on the genotypic
space. Future investigations should investigate the effect of
locality for surprise search. Experiments in this paper (see
Fig. 5b) already showcase that algorithm performance is not
sensitive with respect to k (as long as k is sufficiently high
for the problem at hand).
Clustering: Surprise search, in the form presented here,
requires some form of behavioural clustering. While k-means
was investigated in the experiments of this paper for its
simplicity and popularity, any clustering algorithm is applicable. Comparative studies between approaches need to be
investigated, including different ways of dealing with (or
taking advantage of) empty clusters.
XI. C ONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we argue that surprise is a concept that can
be exploited for evolutionary divergent search, we provide a
general definition of the algorithm that follows the principles
of searching for surprise and we test the idea in a maze
navigation task. Results show that surprise search has clear advantages over other forms of evolutionary divergent search, i.
e. novelty search, and outperforms traditional fitness search in
deceptive problems. In particular, surprise search has shown a
comparable efficiency to novelty search and, most importantly,
to be more successful and faster in finding the goal. Moreover,
a detailed analysis of the behaviours and the genomes evolved
by surprise search has revealed a more diverse population
and a higher exploratory capacity. Finally, the capacity of
surprise search to generalize in tasks of increasing complexity
is evidently higher when surprise drives the search process,
as tested in randomly generated mazes of increasing deceptive
properties. These findings support the idea that deviation from
expected behaviours can be a powerful alternative to divergent
search with key benefits over novelty or objective search.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work has been supported in part by the FP7 Marie
Curie CIG project AutoGameDesign (project no: 630665).
R EFERENCES
[1] D. E. Goldberg and J. H. Holland, “Genetic algorithms and machine
learning,” Machine learning, vol. 3, no. 2, 1988.
[2] R. S. Michalski, J. G. Carbonell, and T. M. Mitchell, Machine learning:
An artificial intelligence approach. Springer Science & Business Media,
2013.
[3] D. E. Goldberg, “Simple genetic algorithms and the minimal deceptive
problem,” in Genetic Algorithms and Simulated Annealing, Research
Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.
15
[4] L. D. Whitley, “Fundamental principles of deception in genetic search,”
in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
[5] D. E. Goldberg and J. Richardson, “Genetic algorithms with sharing
for multimodal function optimization,” in Proceedings of the Second
International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1987.
[6] J. Hu, E. Goodman, K. Seo, Z. Fan, and R. Rosenberg, “The hierarchical fair competition (hfc) framework for sustainable evolutionary
algorithms,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 13, no. 2, 2005.
[7] G. S. Hornby, “Alps: the age-layered population structure for reducing
the problem of premature convergence,” in Proceedings of the Genetic
and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2006.
[8] J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley, “Abandoning objectives: Evolution through
the search for novelty alone,” Evolutionary computation, vol. 19, no. 2,
2011.
[9] A. Channon, “Passing the alife test: Activity statistics classify evolution
in geb as unbounded,” in Advances in Artificial Life. Springer, 2001.
[10] L. Yaeger, “Poly world: Life in a new context,” Proc. Artificial Life,
vol. 3, 1994.
[11] C. Adami, C. Ofria, and T. C. Collier, “Evolution of biological complexity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 97, no. 9,
2000.
[12] M. A. Boden, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Routledge,
2004.
[13] G. Ritchie, “Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a
computer program,” Minds and Machines, vol. 17, no. 1, 2007.
[14] G. A. Wiggins, “A preliminary framework for description, analysis and
comparison of creative systems,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 19,
no. 7, 2006.
[15] J. Lehman, K. O. Stanley, and R. Miikkulainen, “Effective diversity
maintenance in deceptive domains,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and
Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2013.
[16] A. Liapis, H. P. Martı́nez, J. Togelius, and G. N. Yannakakis, “Transforming exploratory creativity with DeLeNoX,” in Proceedings of the
International Conference on Computational Creativity, 2013.
[17] J. K. Pugh, L. B. Soros, and K. O. Stanley, “Quality diversity: A new
frontier for evolutionary computation,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI,
vol. 3, p. 40, 2016.
[18] K. Grace, M. L. Maher, D. Fisher, and K. Brady, “Modeling expectation
for evaluating surprise in design creativity,” in Design Computing and
Cognition, 2014.
[19] M. L. Maher, “Evaluating creativity in humans, computers, and collectively intelligent systems,” in Proceedings of the 1st DESIRE Network
Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, 2010.
[20] A. Barto, M. Mirolli, and G. Baldassarre, “Novelty or surprise?”
Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 4, 2013.
[21] E. Lorini and C. Castelfranchi, “The cognitive structure of surprise:
looking for basic principles,” Topoi, vol. 26, no. 1, 2007.
[22] G. N. Yannakakis and A. Liapis, “Searching for surprise,” in Proceedings
of the International Conference on Computational Creativity, 2016.
[23] D. Gravina, A. Liapis, and G. N. Yannakakis, “Surprise search: Beyond
objectives and novelty,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation Conference. ACM, 2016.
[24] G. E. Liepins and M. D. Vose, “Representational issues in genetic
optimization,” Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, no. 101, 1990.
[25] S. A. Kauffman, “Adaptation on rugged fitness landscapes,” in Lectures
in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison-Wesley, 1989.
[26] Y. Davidor, “Epistasis variance: A viewpoint on ga-hardness,” in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
[27] B. Naudts and A. Verschoren, “Epistasis and deceptivity,” Bulletin of
the Belgian Mathematical Society, vol. 6, no. 1, 1999.
[28] K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen, “Evolving neural networks through
augmenting topologies,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 2, 2002.
[29] S. Wessing, M. Preuss, and G. Rudolph, “Niching by multiobjectivization with neighbor information: Trade-offs and benefits,” in Proceedings
of the Evolutionary Computation Congress, 2013.
[30] P. J. Angeline and J. B. Pollack, “Competitive environments evolve
better solutions for complex tasks,” in Proceedings of the International
Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1994.
[31] S. Ficici and J. B. Pollack, “Challenges in coevolutionary learning:
Arms-race dynamics, open-endedness, and mediocre stable states,” in
Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Life, 1998.
[32] J. D. Knowles, R. A. Watson, and D. W. Corne, “Reducing local optima
in single-objective problems by multi-objectivization,” in International
Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. Springer,
2001, pp. 269–283.
[33] K. Deb, “Multi-objective genetic algorithms: Problem difficulties and
construction of test problems,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, 1999.
[34] J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley, “Beyond open-endedness: Quantifying
impressiveness,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on
Artificial Life, 2012.
[35] ——, “Evolving a diversity of virtual creatures through novelty search
and local competition,” in Proceedings of the 13th annual conference
on Genetic and evolutionary computation. ACM, 2011, pp. 211–218.
[36] J.-B. Mouret and J. Clune, “Illuminating search spaces by mapping
elites,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.04909, 2015.
[37] A. Liapis, G. N. Yannakakis, and J. Togelius, “Constrained novelty
search: A study on game content generation,” Evolutionary Computation,
vol. 23, no. 1, 2015.
[38] D. Gravina, A. Liapis, and G. N. Yannakakis, “Constrained surprise
search for content generation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computational Intelligence and Games Conference. IEEE, 2016.
[39] P. Ekman, “An argument for basic emotions,” Cognition & emotion,
vol. 6, no. 3-4, 1992.
[40] W.-U. Meyer, R. Reisenzein, and A. Schützwohl, “Toward a process
analysis of emotions: The case of surprise,” Motivation and Emotion,
vol. 21, no. 3, 1997.
[41] A. Ortony and D. Partridge, “Surprisingness and expectation failure:
what’s the difference?” in Proceedings of the Joint conference on
Artificial intelligence, 1987.
[42] L. Macedo and A. Cardoso, “Modeling forms of surprise in an artificial
agent,” in Proceedings of the nnual Conference of the Cognitive Science
Society, 2001.
[43] P.-Y. Oudeyer, F. Kaplan, and V. V. Hafner, “Intrinsic motivation
systems for autonomous mental development,” IEEE Transactions on
Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, no. 2, 2007.
[44] J. Schmidhuber, “Formal theory of creativity, fun, and intrinsic motivation (1990–2010),” IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, vol. 2, no. 3, 2010.
[45] F. Kaplan and V. V. Hafner, “Information-theoretic framework for
unsupervised activity classification,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 20, no. 10,
2006.
[46] D. Gravina, A. Liapis, and G. N. Yannakakis, “Coupling novelty and
surprise for evolutionary divergence,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and
Evolutionary Computation Conference, 2017.
[47] J. A. Hartigan and M. A. Wong, “Algorithm as 136: A k-means
clustering algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series
C (Applied Statistics), vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 100–108, 1979.
[48] G. N. Yannakakis, J. Levine, J. Hallam, and M. Papageorgiou, “Performance, robustness and effort cost comparison of machine learning
mechanisms in flatland,” in Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 2003.
[49] J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley, “Novelty search and the problem with
objectives,” in Genetic Programming Theory and Practice IX. Springer,
2011, pp. 37–56.
[50] A. Reynolds, “Maze-solving by chemotaxis,” Physical Review E, vol. 81,
no. 6, p. 062901, 2010.
[51] J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley, “Improving evolvability through novelty
search and self-adaptation,” in 2011 IEEE Congress of Evolutionary
Computation (CEC). IEEE, 2011, pp. 2693–2700.
[52] D. Gravina, A. Liapis, and G. N. Yannakakis, “Exploring divergence in
soft robot evolution,” in Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary
Computation Conference Companion. ACM, 2017.
| 9cs.NE
|
Journal of Automated Reasoning manuscript No.
(will be inserted by the editor)
Mechanized semantics for the Clight subset of the C language
arXiv:0901.3619v1 [cs.PL] 23 Jan 2009
Sandrine Blazy · Xavier Leroy
the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later
Abstract This article presents the formal semantics of a large subset of the C language
called Clight. Clight includes pointer arithmetic, struct and union types, C loops and structured switch statements. Clight is the source language of the CompCert verified compiler.
The formal semantics of Clight is a big-step operational semantics that observes both terminating and diverging executions and produces traces of input/output events. The formal
semantics of Clight is mechanized using the Coq proof assistant. In addition to the semantics
of Clight, this article describes its integration in the CompCert verified compiler and several
ways by which the semantics was validated.
Keywords The C programming language · Operational semantics · Mechanized semantics ·
Formal proof · The Coq proof assistant
1 Introduction
Formal semantics of programming languages—that is, the mathematical specification of
legal programs and their behaviors—play an important role in several areas of computer
science. For advanced programmers and compiler writers, formal semantics provide a more
precise alternative to the informal English descriptions that usually pass as language standards. In the context of formal methods such as static analysis, model checking and program
proof, formal semantics are required to validate the abstract interpretations and program logics (e.g. axiomatic semantics) used to analyze and reason about programs. The verification of
programming tools such as compilers, type-checkers, static analyzers and program verifiers
is another area where formal semantics for the languages involved is a prerequisite. While
This work was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche, grant number ANR-05-SSIA-0019.
S. Blazy
ENSIIE, 1 square de la Résistance, 91025 Evry cedex, France
E-mail: [email protected]
X. Leroy
INRIA Paris-Rocquencourt, B.P. 105, 78153 Le Chesnay, France
E-mail: [email protected]
2
formal semantics for realistic languages can be defined on paper using ordinary mathematics [31, 16, 7], machine assistance such as the use of proof assistants greatly facilitates their
definition and uses.
For high-level programming languages such as Java and functional languages, there exists a sizeable body of mechanized formalizations and verifications of operational semantics,
axiomatic semantics, and programming tools such as compilers and bytecode verifiers. Despite being more popular for writing systems software and embedded software, lower-level
languages such as C have attracted less interest: several formal semantics for various subsets
of C have been published, but only a few have been mechanized.
The present article reports on the definition of the formal semantics of a large subset
of the C language called Clight. Clight features most of the types and operators of C, including pointer arithmetic, pointers to functions, and struct and union types, as well as
all C control structures except goto. The semantics of Clight is mechanized using the Coq
proof assistant [10, 4]. It is presented as a big-step operational semantics that observes both
terminating and diverging executions and produces traces of input/output events. The Clight
subset of C and its semantics are presented in sections 2 and 3, respectively.
The work presented in this paper is part of an ongoing project called CompCert that
develops a realistic compiler for the C language and formally verifies that it preserves the
semantics of the programs being compiled. A previous paper [6] reports on the development
and proof of semantic preservation in Coq of the front-end of this compiler: a translator from
Clight to Cminor, a low-level, imperative intermediate language. The formal verification of
the back-end of this compiler, which generates moderately optimized PowerPC assembly
code from Cminor is described in [28]. Section 4 describes the integration of the Clight
language and its semantics within the CompCert compiler and its verification.
Formal semantics for realistic programming languages are large and complicated. This
raises the question of validating these semantics: how can we make sure that they correctly
capture the expected behaviors? In section 5, we argue that the correctness proof of the
CompCert compiler provides an indirect but original way to validate the semantics of Clight,
and discuss other approaches to the validation problem that we considered.
We finish this article by a discussion of related work in section 6, followed by future
work and conclusions in section 7.
Availability The Coq development underlying this article can be consulted on-line at
http://compcert.inria.fr .
Notations [x, y[ denotes the semi-open interval of integers {n ∈ Z | x ≤ n < y}. For functions
returning “option” types, ⌊x⌋ (read: “some x”) corresponds to success with return value x,
and 0/ (read: “none”) corresponds to failure. In grammars, a∗ denotes 0, 1 or several occurrences of syntactic category a, and a? denotes an optional occurrence of syntactic category a.
2 Abstract syntax of Clight
Clight is structured into expressions, statements and functions. In the Coq formalization, the
abstract syntax is presented as inductive data types, therefore achieving a deep embedding
of Clight into Coq.
3
Signedness:
Integer sizes:
Float sizes:
signedness ::= Signed | Unsigned
intsize ::= I8 | I16 | I32
floatsize ::= F32 | F64
Types:
τ ::= int(intsize,signedness)
| float(floatsize)
| void
| array(τ ,n)
| pointer(τ )
| function(τ ∗ , τ )
| struct(id, ϕ )
| union(id, ϕ )
| comp pointer(id)
Field lists:
ϕ ::= (id, τ )∗
Fig. 1 Abstract syntax of Clight types.
2.1 Types
The abstract syntax of Clight types is given in figure 1. Supported types include arithmetic
types (integers and floats in various sizes and signedness), array types, pointer types (including pointers to functions), function types, as well as struct and union types. Named types
are omitted: we assume that typedef definitions have been expanded away during parsing
and type-checking.
The integral types fully specify the bit size of integers and floats, unlike the C types int,
long, etc, whose sizes are left largely unspecified in the C standard. Typically, the parser
maps int and long to size I32, float to size F32, and double to size F64. Currently, 64-bit
integers and extended-precision floats are not supported.
Array types carry the number n of elements of the array, as a compile-time constant. Arrays with unknown sizes (τ [] in C) are replaced by pointer types in function parameter lists.
Their only other use in C is within extern declarations of arrays, which are not supported
in Clight.
Functions types specify the number and types of the function arguments and the type of
the function result. Variadic functions and unprototyped functions (in the style of Ritchie’s
pre-standard C) are not supported.
In C, struct and union types are named and compared by name. This enables the
definition of recursive struct types such as struct s1 { int n; struct * s1 next;}.
Recursion within such types must go through a pointer type. For instance, the following is
not allowed in C: struct s2 { int n; struct s2 next;}. To obviate the need to carry
around a typing environment mapping struct and union names to their definitions, Clight
struct and union types are structural: they carry a local identifier id and the list ϕ of their
fields (names and types). Bit-fields are not supported. These types are compared by structure, like all other Clight types. In structural type systems, recursive types are traditionally
represented with a fixpoint operator µα .τ , where α names the type µα .τ within τ . We
adapt this idea to Clight: within a struct or union type, the type comp pointer(id) stands
for a pointer type to the nearest enclosing struct or union type named id. For example, the
structure s1 defined previously in C is expressed by
struct(s1, (n, int(I32, signed))(next, comp pointer(s1)))
4
Expressions:
a ::= id
|n
|f
| sizeof(τ )
| op1 a
| a1 op2 a2
| *a
| a.id
| &a
| (τ )a
| a1 ? a2 : a3
Unary operators:
op1 ::= - | ~ | !
Binary operators:
op2 ::= + | - | * | / | %
| << | >> | & | | | ^
| < | <= | > | >= | == | !=
variable identifier
integer constant
float constant
size of a type
unary arithmetic operation
binary arithmetic operation
pointer dereferencing
field access
taking the address of
type cast
conditional expressions
arithmetic operators
bitwise operators
relational operators
Fig. 2 Abstract syntax of Clight expressions
Incorrect structures such as s2 above cannot be expressed at all, since comp_pointer let us
refer to a pointer to an enclosing struct or union, but not to the struct or union directly.
Clight does not support any of the type qualifiers of C (const, volatile, restrict).
These qualifiers are simply erased during parsing.
The following operations over types are defined: sizeof(τ ) returns the storage size, in
bytes, of type τ , and field offset(id, ϕ ) returns the byte offset of the field named id in a
struct whose field list is ϕ , or 0/ if id does not appear in ϕ . The Coq development gives
concrete definitions for these functions, compatible with the PowerPC ABI [48, chap. 3].
Typically, struct fields are laid out consecutively and padding is inserted so that each field
is naturally aligned. Here are the only properties that a Clight producer or user needs to rely
on:
– Sizes are positive: sizeof(τ ) > 0 for all types τ .
– Field offsets are within the range of allowed byte offsets for their enclosing struct: if
field offset(id, ϕ ) = ⌊δ ⌋ and τ is the type associated with id in ϕ , then
[δ , δ + sizeof(τ )[ ⊆ [0, sizeof(struct id′ ϕ )[.
– Different fields correspond to disjoint byte ranges: if field offset(idi , ϕ ) = ⌊δi ⌋ and
τi is the type associated with id i in ϕ and id 1 6= id 2 , then
[δ1 , δ1 + sizeof(τ1 )[ ∩ [δ2 , δ2 + sizeof(τ2 )[ = 0.
/
– When a struct is a prefix of another struct, fields shared between the two struct have
the same offsets: if field offset(id, ϕ ) = ⌊δ ⌋, then field offset(id, ϕ .ϕ ′) = ⌊δ ⌋ for
all additional fields ϕ ′ .
2.2 Expressions
The syntax of expressions is given in figure 2. All expressions and their sub-expressions
are annotated by their static types. In the Coq formalization, expressions a are therefore
pairs (b, τ ) of a type τ and a term b of an inductive datatype determining the kind and
5
Statements:
Switch cases:
s ::= skip
| a1 = a2
| a1 = a2 (a∗ )
| a(a∗ )
| s1 ;s2
| if(a) s1 else s2
| switch(a) sw
| while(a) s
| do s while(a)
| for(s1 ,a2 ,s3 ) s
| break
| continue
| return a?
sw ::= default : s
| case n : s;sw
empty statement
assignment
function call
procedure call
sequence
conditional
multi-way branch
“while” loop
“do” loop
“for” loop
exit from the current loop
next iteration of the current loop
return from current function
default case
labeled case
Fig. 3 Abstract syntax of Clight statements.
arguments of the expression. In this paper, we omit the type annotations over expressions,
but write type(a) for the type annotating the expression a. The types carried by expressions
are necessary to determine the semantics of type-dependent operators such as overloaded
arithmetic operators. The following expressions can occur in left-value position: id, *a, and
a. id.
Within expressions, only side-effect free operators of C are supported, but not assignment operators (=, +=, ++, etc) nor function calls. In Clight, assignments and function calls
are presented as statements and cannot occur within expressions. As a consequence, all
Clight expressions always terminate and are pure: their evaluation performs no side effects.
The first motivation for this design decision is to ensure determinism of evaluation. The
C standard leaves evaluation order within expressions partially unspecified. If expressions
can contain side-effects, different evaluation orders can lead to different results. As demonstrated by Norrish [36], capturing exactly the amount of nondeterminism permitted by the
C standard complicates a formal semantics.
It is of course possible to commit on a particular evaluation order in a formal semantics for C. (Most C compiler choose a fixed evaluation order, typically right-to-left.) This is
the approach we followed in an earlier version of this work [6]. Deterministic side-effects
within expressions can be accommodated relatively easily with some styles of semantics
(such as the big-step operational semantics of [6]), but complicate or even prevent other
forms of semantics. In particular, it is much easier to define axiomatic semantics such as
Hoare logic and separation logic if expressions are terminating and pure: in this case, syntactic expressions can safely be used as part of the logical assertions of the logic. Likewise,
abstract interpretations and other forms of static analysis are much simplified if expressions
are pure. Most static analysis and program verification tools for C actually start by pulling
assignments and function calls out of expressions, and only then perform analyses over pure
expressions [9, 13, 42, 8, 1, 17].
6
dcl ::= (τ id)∗
Variable declarations:
name and type
F ::= τ id(dcl1 ) { dcl2 ; s } (dcl1 = parameters, dcl2 = local variables)
Internal function definitions:
External function declarations:
Fe ::= extern τ id(dcl)
Functions:
Fd ::= F | Fe
internal or external
P ::= dcl;Fd∗ ;main = id
Programs:
global variables, functions, entry point
Fig. 4 Abstract syntax of Clight functions and programs.
Some forms of C expressions are omitted in the abstract syntax but can be expressed as
syntactic sugar:
array access:
a1 [a2 ]
indirect field access: a->id
sequential “and”:
a1 && a2
sequential “or”:
a1 || a2
≡
≡
≡
≡
*(a1 + a2 )
*(a.id)
a1 ? (a2 ? 1 : 0) : 0
a1 ? 1 : (a2 ? 1 : 0)
2.3 Statements
Figure 3 defines the syntax of Clight statements. All structured control statements of C
(conditional, loops, Java-style switch, break, continue and return) are supported, but
not unstructured statements such as goto and unstructured switch like the infamous “Duff’s
device” [12]. As previously mentioned, assignment a1 = a2 of an r-value a2 to an l-value a1 ,
as well as function calls, are treated as statements. For function calls, the result can either
be assigned to an l-value or discarded.
Blocks are omitted because block-scoped variables are not supported in Clight: variables
are declared either with global scope at the level of programs, or with function scope at the
beginning of functions.
The for loop is written for(s1 , a2 , s3 ) s, where s1 is executed once at the beginning of
the loop, a2 is the loop condition, s3 is executed at the end of each iteration, and s is the loop
body. In C, s1 and s3 are expressions, which are evaluated for their side effects. In Clight,
since expressions are pure, we use statements instead. (However, the semantics requires that
these statements terminate normally, but not by e.g. break.)
A switch statement consists in an expression and a list of cases. A case is a statement
labeled by an integer constant (case n) or by the keyword default. Contrary to C, the
default case is mandatory in a Clight switch statement and must occur last.
2.4 Functions and programs
A Clight program is composed of a list of declarations for global variables (name and type),
a list of functions (see figure 4) and an identifier naming the entry point of the program (the
main function in C). The Coq formalization supports a rudimentary form of initialization for
global variables, where an initializer is a sequence of integer or floating-point constants; we
omit this feature in this article.
Functions come in two flavors: internal or external. An internal function, written
τ id(dcl1 ) { dcl2 ; s }, is defined within the language. τ is the return type, id the name of
7
the function, dcl1 its parameters (names and types), dcl2 its local variables, and s its body.
External functions extern τ id(dcl) are merely declared, but not implemented. They are
intended to model “system calls”, whose result is provided by the operating system instead
of being computed by a piece of Clight code.
3 Formal semantics for Clight
We now formalize the dynamic semantics of Clight, using natural semantics, also known as
big-step operational semantics. The natural semantics observe the final result of program execution (divergence or termination), as well as a trace of the invocations of external functions
performed by the program. The latter represents the input/output behavior of the program.
Owing to the restriction that expressions are pure (section 2.2), the dynamic semantics is
deterministic.
The static semantics of Clight (that is, its typing rules) has not been formally specified
yet. The dynamic semantics is defined without assuming that the program is well-typed, and
in particular without assuming that the type annotations over expressions are consistent. If
they are inconsistent, the dynamic semantics can be undefined (the program goes wrong), or
be defined but differ from what the C standard prescribes.
3.1 Evaluation judgements
The semantics is defined by the 10 judgements (predicates) listed below. They use semantic
quantities such as values, environments, etc, that are summarized in figure 5 and explained
later.
G, E ⊢ a, M ⇐ ℓ
(evaluation of expressions in l-value position)
G, E ⊢ a, M ⇒ v
(evaluation of expressions in r-value position)
G, E ⊢ a∗ , M ⇒ v∗
(evaluation of lists of expressions)
t
G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ out, M ′
(execution of statements, terminating case)
t
G, E ⊢ sw, M ⇒ out, M ′ (execution of the cases of a switch, terminating case)
t
G ⊢ Fd(v∗ ), M ⇒ v, M ′ (evaluation of function invocations, terminating case)
T
G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ ∞
(execution of statements, diverging case)
T
G, E ⊢ sw, M ⇒ ∞
(execution of the cases of a switch, diverging case)
T
G ⊢ Fd(v∗ ), M ⇒ ∞
⊢ P⇒B
(evaluation of function invocations, diverging case)
(execution of whole programs)
Each judgement relates a syntactic element to the result of executing this syntactic element. For an expression in l-value position, the result is a location ℓ: a pair of a block
identifier b and a byte offset δ within this block. For an expression in r-value position and
for a function application, the result is a value v: the discriminated union of 32-bit integers,
64-bit floating-point numbers, locations (representing the value of pointers), and the special
value undef representing the contents of uninitialized memory. Clight does not support assignment between struct or union, nor passing a struct or union by value to a function;
therefore, struct and union values need not be represented.
Following Norrish [36] and Huisman and Jacobs [21], the result associated with the
execution of a statement s is an outcome out indicating how the execution terminated: either normally by running to completion or prematurely via a break, continue or return
statement.
8
Block references:
b ∈Z
Memory locations:
ℓ ::= (b, δ )
byte offset δ (a 32-bit integer) within block b
Values:
v ::= int(n)
| float( f )
| ptr(ℓ)
| undef
integer value (n is a 32-bit integer)
floating-point value ( f is a 64-bit float)
pointer value
undefined value
Statement outcomes:
out ::= Normal
| Continue
| Break
| Return
| Return(v)
Global environments:
G ::= (id 7→ b)
×(b 7→ Fd)
map from global variables to block references
and map from function references to function definitions
Local environments:
E ::= id 7→ b
map from local variables to block references
Memory states:
M ::= b 7→ (lo,hi, δ 7→ v)
map from block references to bounds and contents
Memory quantities:
κ ::= int8signed | int8unsigned
| int16signed | int16unsigned
| int32 | float32 | float64
vν ::= int(n) | float( f )
I/O values:
continue with next statement
go to the next iteration of the current loop
exit from the current loop
function exit
function exit, returning the value v
I/O events:
ν ::= id( vν ∗ 7→ vν )
name of external function, argument values, result value
Traces:
t ::= ε | ν .t
T ::= ε | ν .T
finite traces (inductive)
finite or infinite traces (coinductive)
Program behaviors:
B ::= terminates(t,n)
| diverges(T )
termination with trace t and exit code n
divergence with trace T
Operations over memory states:
alloc(M,lo,hi) = (M′ ,b)
Allocate a fresh block of bounds [lo,hi[.
free(M,b) = M′
Free (invalidate) the block b.
load(κ ,M,b,n) = ⌊v⌋
Read one or several consecutive bytes (as determined by κ ) at block b,
offset n in memory state M. If successful return the contents of these
bytes as value v.
store(κ ,M,b,n,v) = ⌊M′ ⌋ Store the value v into one or several consecutive bytes (as determined
by κ ) at offset n in block b of memory state M. If successful, return an
updated memory state M′ .
Operations over global environments:
funct(G,b) = ⌊b⌋
Return the function definition Fd corresponding to the block b, if any.
symbol(G,id) = ⌊b⌋ Return the block b corresponding to the global variable or function name id.
globalenv(P) = G
Construct the global environment G associated with the program P.
initmem(P) = M
Construct the initial memory state M for executing the program P.
Fig. 5 Semantic elements: values, environments, memory states, statement outcomes, etc
Most judgements are parameterized by a global environment G, a local environment E,
and an initial memory state M. Local environments map function-scoped variables to references of memory blocks containing the values of these variables. (This indirection through
memory is needed to allow the & operator to take the address of a variable.) These blocks
are allocated at function entry and freed at function return (see rule 32 in figure 10). Likewise, the global environment G associates block references to program-global variables and
functions. It also records the definitions of functions.
The memory model used in our semantics is detailed in [29]. Memory states M are
modeled as a collection of blocks separated by construction and identified by integers b.
Each block has lower and upper bounds lo, hi, fixed at allocation time, and associates values
9
Expressions in l-value position:
E(id) = b or (id ∈
/ Dom(E) and symbol(G,id) = ⌊b⌋)
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ ptr(ℓ)
(1)
G,E ⊢ id,M ⇐ (b,0)
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇐ (b, δ )
(2)
G,E ⊢ *a,M ⇐ ℓ
type(a) = struct(id′ , ϕ )
field offset(id, ϕ ) = ⌊δ ′ ⌋
G,E ⊢ a.id,M ⇐ (b, δ + δ )
(3)
′
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇐ ℓ
type(a) = union(id′ , ϕ )
(4)
G,E ⊢ a.id,M ⇐ ℓ
Expressions in r-value position:
G,E ⊢ n,M ⇒ int(n) (5)
G,E ⊢ f ,M ⇒ float( f ) (6)
G,E ⊢ sizeof(τ ),M ⇒ int(sizeof(τ )) (7)
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇐ ℓ
G,E ⊢ &a,M ⇒ ptr(ℓ)
G,E ⊢ a1 ,M ⇒ v1
(8)
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
G,E ⊢ a1 ,M ⇒ v1
(9)
loadval(type(a),M′ ,ℓ) = ⌊v⌋
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇐ ℓ
eval unop(op1 ,v1 ,type(a1 )) = ⌊v⌋
(10)
G,E ⊢ op1 a1 ,M ⇒ v
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M1 ⇒ v2
eval binop(op2 ,v1 ,type(a1 ),v2 ,type(a2 )) = ⌊v⌋
(11)
G,E ⊢ a1 op2 a2 ,M ⇒ v
G,E ⊢ a1 ,M ⇒ v1
is true(v1 ,type(a1 ))
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M ⇒ v2
(12)
G,E ⊢ a1 ? a2 : a3 ,M ⇒ v2
G,E ⊢ a1 ,M ⇒ v1
is false(v1 ,type(a1 ))
G,E ⊢ a3 ,M ⇒ v3
(13)
G,E ⊢ a1 ? a2 : a3 ,M ⇒ v3
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v1
cast(v1 ,type(a), τ ) = ⌊v⌋
G,E ⊢ (τ )a,M ⇒ v
(14)
Fig. 6 Natural semantics for Clight expressions
to byte offsets δ ∈ [lo, hi[. The basic operations over memory states are alloc, free, load
and store, as summarized in figure 5.
Since Clight expressions are pure, the memory state is not modified during expression
evaluation. It is modified, however, during the execution of statements and function calls.
The corresponding judgements therefore return an updated memory state M ′ . They also
produce a trace t of the external functions (system calls) invoked during execution. Each
such invocation is described by an input/output event ν recording the name of the external
function invoked, the arguments provided by the program, and the result value provided by
the operating system.
In addition to terminating behaviors, the semantics also characterizes divergence during
the execution of a statement or of a function call. The treatment of divergence follows the
coinductive natural approach of Leroy and Grall [30]. The result of a diverging execution is
the trace T (possibly infinite) of input/output events performed.
In the Coq specification, the judgements of the dynamic semantics are encoded as mutually inductive predicates (for terminating executions) and mutually coinductive predicates
(for diverging executions). Each defining case of each predicate corresponds exactly to an inference rule in the conventional, on-paper presentation of natural semantics. We show most
of the inference rules in figures 6 to 12, and explain them in the remainder of this section.
10
Access modes:
µ ::= By value(κ )
| By reference
| By nothing
access by value
access by reference
no access
Associating access modes to Clight types:
A (int(I8,Signed))
A (int(I8,Unsigned))
A (int(I16,Signed))
A (int(I16,Unsigned))
A (int(I32, ))
A (pointer( ))
=
=
=
=
=
=
By
By
By
By
By
By
value(int8signed)
A (array( , ))
value(int8unsigned)
A (function( , ))
value(int16signed)
A (struct)( , ))
value(int16unsigned)
A (union)( , ))
value(int32)
A (void)
value(int32)
=
=
=
=
=
By
By
By
By
By
reference
reference
nothing
nothing
nothing
Accessing or updating a value of type τ at location (b, δ ) in memory state M:
loadval(τ ,M,(b, δ ))
loadval(τ ,M,(b, δ ))
loadval(τ ,M,(b, δ ))
storeval(τ ,M,(b, δ ),v)
storeval(τ ,M,(b, δ ),v)
=
=
=
=
=
load(κ ,M,b, δ )
⌊(b, δ )⌋
0/
store(κ ,M,b, δ ,v)
0/
if A (τ ) = By
if A (τ ) = By
if A (τ ) = By
if A (τ ) = By
otherwise
value(κ )
reference
nothing
value(κ )
Fig. 7 Memory accesses.
3.2 Evaluation of expressions
Expressions in l-value position The first four rules of figure 6 illustrate the evaluation of an
expression in l-value position. A variable id evaluates to the location (b, 0), where b is the
block associated with id in the local environment E or the global environment G (rule 1). If
an expression a evaluates (as an r-value) to a pointer value ptr(ℓ), then the location of the
dereferencing expression *a is ℓ (rule 2).
For field accesses a. id, the location ℓ = (b, δ ) of a is computed. If a has union type,
this location is returned unchanged. (All fields of a union share the same position.) If a has
struct type, the offset of field id is computed using the field_offset function, then added
to δ .
From memory locations to values The evaluation of an l-value expression a in r-value position depends on the type of a (rule 8). If a has scalar type, its value is loaded from memory
at the location of a. If a has array type, its value is equal to its location. Finally, some types
cannot be used in r-value position: this includes void in C and struct and union types
in Clight (because of the restriction that structs and unions cannot be passed by value). To
capture these three cases, figure 7 defines the function A that maps Clight types to access
modes, which can be one of: “by value”, with a memory quantity κ (an access loads a quantity κ from the address of the l-value); “by reference” (an access simply returns the address
of the l-value); or “by nothing” (no access is allowed). The loadval and storeval functions, also defined in figure 7, exploit address modes to implement the correct semantics for
conversion of l-value to r-value (loadval) and assignment to an l-value (storeval).
Expressions in r-value position Rules 5 to 14 of figure 6 illustrate the evaluation of an
expression in r-value position. Rule 8 evaluates an l-value expression in an r-value context.
The expression is evaluated to its location ℓ. From this location, a value is deduced using
11
ε
G,E ⊢ skip,M ⇒ Normal,M (15)
ε
G,E ⊢ break,M ⇒ Break,M (16)
ε
G,E ⊢ continue,M ⇒ Continue,M (17)
ε
⇒ Return,M (18)
G,E ⊢ (return 0),M
/
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
(19)
ε
G,E ⊢ (return ⌊a⌋),M ⇒ Return(v),M
G,E ⊢ a1 ,M ⇐ ℓ
storeval(type(a1 ),M,ℓ,v) = ⌊M′ ⌋
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M ⇒ v
ε
(20)
G,E ⊢ (a1 = a2 ),M ⇒ Normal,M′
t
t
2
out,M2
G,E ⊢ s2 ,M1 ⇒
1
Normal,M1
G,E ⊢ s1 ,M ⇒
(21)
t .t
1 2
G,E ⊢ (s1 ;s2 ),M ⇒
out,M2
t
G,E ⊢ s1 ,M ⇒ out,M′
out 6= Normal
(22)
t
G,E ⊢ (s1 ;s2 ),M ⇒ out,M′
Fig. 8 Natural semantics for Clight statements (other than loops and switch statements)
the loadval function described above. By rule 9, &a evaluates to the pointer value ptr(ℓ) as
soon as the l-value a evaluates to the location ℓ.
Rules 10 and 11 describe the evaluation of unary and binary operations. Taking binary
operations as an example, the two argument expressions are evaluated and their values v1 , v2
are combined using the the eval_binop function, which takes as additional arguments the
types τ1 and τ2 of the arguments, in order to resolve overloaded and type-dependent operators. To give the general flavor of eval_binop, here are the cases corresponding to binary
addition:
τ1
τ2
v1
int( ) int( ) int(n1 )
float( ) float( ) float( f1 )
ptr(τ ) int( ) ptr(b, δ )
int( ) ptr(τ ) int(n)
otherwise
v2
int(n2 )
float( f2 )
int(n)
ptr(b, δ )
eval binop(+, v1 , τ1 , v2 , τ2 )
⌊int(n1 + n2 )⌋
⌊float( f1 + f2 )⌋
⌊ptr(b, δ + n × sizeof(τ ))⌋
⌊ptr(b, δ + n × sizeof(τ ))⌋
0/
The definition above rejects mixed arithmetic such as “int + float” because the parser that
generates Clight abstract syntax (described in section 4.1) never produces this: it inserts
explicit casts from integers to floats in this case. However, it would be easy to add cases
dealing with mixed arithmetic. Likewise, the definition above adds two single precision
floats using double-precision addition, in violation of the ISO C standard. Again, it would
be easy to recognize this case and perform a single-precision addition.
Rules 12 and 13 define the evaluation of conditional expressions a1 ? a2 : a3 . The
predicates is_true and is_false determine the truth value of the value of a1 , depending
on its type. At a float type, float(0.0) is false and any other float value is true. At an int
or ptr type, int(0) is false and int(n) (n 6= 0) and ptr(ℓ) values are true. (The null pointer
is represented as int(0).) All other combinations of values and types are neither true nor
false, causing the semantics to go wrong.
Rule 14 evaluates a cast expression (τ )a. The expression a is evaluated, and its value
is converted from its natural type type(a) to the expected type τ using the partial function
cast. This function performs appropriate conversions, truncations and sign-extensions between integers and floats. We take a lax interpretation of casts involving pointer types: if the
12
Outcome updates (at the end of a loop execution):
loop
Break ❀ Normal
loop
loop
Return ❀ Return
Return(v) ❀ Return(v)
while loops:
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
is false(v,type(a))
ε
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
is true(v,type(a))
t
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒ out,M′
(23)
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M ⇒ Normal,M
loop
out ❀ out ′
(24)
t
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M ⇒ out′ ,M′
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v is true(v,type(a))
t1
t2
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒
(Normal | Continue),M1
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M1 ⇒
out′ ,M2
(25)
t .t
1 2
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M ⇒
out′ ,M2
for loops:
s1 6= skip
t
1
G,E ⊢ s1 ,M ⇒
Normal,M1
t
2
G,E ⊢ (for(skip,a2 ,s3 ) s),M1 ⇒
out,M2
(26)
t .t
1 2
G,E ⊢ (for(s1 ,a2 ,s3 ) s),M ⇒
out,M2
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M ⇒ v
is false(v,type(a2 ))
ε
G,E ⊢ (for(skip,a2 ,s3 ) s),M ⇒ Normal,M
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M ⇒ v
is true(v,type(a2 ))
t
1
out1 ,M1
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒
(27)
loop
out1 ❀ out
(28)
t
G,E ⊢ (for(skip,a2 ,s3 ) s),M ⇒ out,M1
G,E ⊢ a2 ,M ⇒ v is true(v,type(a2 ))
t1
t2
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒
(Normal | Continue),M1
G,E ⊢ s3 ,M1 ⇒
Normal,M2
t
3
out,M3
G,E ⊢ (for(skip,a2 ,s3 ) s),M2 ⇒
(29)
t .t .t
2 3
out,M3
G,E ⊢ (for(skip,a2 ,s3 ) ),M 1 ⇒
Fig. 9 Natural semantics for Clight loops
source and destination types are both either pointer types or 32-bit int types, any pointer
or integer value can be converted between these types without change of representation.
However, the cast function fails when converting between pointer types and float or small
integer types, for example.
3.3 Statements and function invocations, terminating case
The rules in figure 8 define the execution of a statement that is neither a loop nor a switch
statement. The execution of a skip statement yields the Normal outcome and the empty trace
(rule 15). Similarly, the execution of a break (resp. continue) statement yields the Break
(resp. Continue) outcome and the empty trace (rules 16 and 17). Rules 18–19 describe
the execution of a return statement. The execution of a return statement evaluates the
argument of the return, if any, and yields a Return outcome and the empty trace.
Rule 20 executes an assignment statement. An assignment statement a1 = a2 evaluates
the l-value a1 to a location ℓ and the r-value a2 to a value v, then stores v at ℓ using the
storeval function of figure 7, producing the final memory state M ′ . We assume that the
types of a1 and a2 are identical, therefore no implicit cast is performed during assignment,
unlike in C. (The Clight parser described in section 4.1 inserts an explicit cast on the r-value
13
Function calls:
G,E ⊢ a f un ,M ⇒ ptr(b,0)
G,E ⊢ aargs ,M ⇒ vargs
t
G ⊢ Fd(vargs ),M ⇒ vres ,M′
funct(G,b) = ⌊Fd⌋ type of fundef(Fd) = type(a f un )
(30)
t
G,E ⊢ a f un (aargs ),M ⇒ vres ,M′
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇐ ℓ
G,E ⊢ a f un ,M ⇒ ptr(b,0)
G,E ⊢ aargs ,M ⇒ vargs
t
funct(G,b) = ⌊Fd⌋
type of fundef(Fd) = type(a f un ) G ⊢ Fd(vargs ),M ⇒ vres ,M1
storeval(type(a),M1 ,ptr(ℓ),vres ) = ⌊M2 ⌋
(31)
t
G,E ⊢ a = a f un (aargs ),M ⇒ vres ,M2
Compatibility between values, outcomes and return types:
Normal,void # undef
Return, void # undef
Return(v), τ # v when τ 6= void
Function invocations:
F = τ id(dcl1 ) { dcl2 ; s }
alloc vars(M,dcl 1 + dcl2 ,E) = (M1 ,b∗ ) bind params(E,M1 ,dcl1 ,vargs ) = M2
t
G,E ⊢ s,M2 ⇒ out,M3
out, τ # vres
(32)
t
G ⊢ F(vargs ),M ⇒ vres ,free(M3 ,b∗ )
Fe = extern τ id(dcl)
ν = id( vargs ,vres )
ν
(33)
G ⊢ Fe(vargs ),M ⇒ vres ,M
Fig. 10 Natural semantics for function calls
a2 when necessary.) Note that storeval fails if a1 has a struct or union type: assignments
between composite data types are not supported in Clight.
The execution of a sequence of two statements starts with the execution of the first
statement, thus yielding an outcome that determines whether the second statement must be
executed or not (rules 21 and 22). The resulting trace is the concatenation of both traces
originating from both statement executions.
The rules in figure 9 define the execution of while and for loops. (The rules describing
the execution of dowhile loops resemble the rules for while loops and are omitted in this
paper.) Once the condition of a while loop is evaluated to a value v, if v is false, the execution
of the loop terminates normally, with an empty trace (rules 23 and 27). If v is true, the loop
body s is executed, thus yielding an outcome out (rules 24, 25, 28 and 29). If out is Normal or
Continue, the whole loop is re-executed in the memory state modified by the first execution
of the body. In s, the execution of a continue statement interrupts the current execution
of the loop body and triggers the next iteration of s. If out is Break, the loop terminates
normally; if out is Return, the loop terminates prematurely with the same outcome (rules 24
loop
and 28). The ❀ relation models this evolution of outcomes after the premature end of the
execution of a loop body.
Rules 26–29 describe the execution of a for(s1 , a2 , s3 ) s loop. Rule 26 executes the
initial statement s1 of a for loop, which must terminate normally. Then, the loop with an
empty initial statement is executed in a way similar to that of a while loop (rules 27–29). If
the body s terminates normally or by performing a continue, the statement s3 is executed
before re-executing the for loop. As in the case of s1 , it must be the case that s3 terminates
normally.
14
t
T
G,E ⊢ s1 ,M ⇒ ∞
T
G,E ⊢ s2 ,M1 ⇒ ∞
G,E ⊢ s1 ,M ⇒ Normal,M1
(34)
T
(35)
t.T
G,E ⊢ s1 ;s2 ,M ⇒ ∞
G,E ⊢ s1 ;s2 ,M ⇒ ∞
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
T
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒ ∞
is true(v,type(a))
(36)
T
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M ⇒ ∞
G,E ⊢ a,M ⇒ v
is true(v,type(a))
t
G,E ⊢ s,M ⇒ (Normal | Continue),M1
T
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M1 ⇒ ∞
(37)
t.T
G,E ⊢ (while(a) s),M ⇒ ∞
G,E ⊢ a f un ,M ⇒ ptr(b,0)
funct(G,b) = ⌊Fd⌋
G,E ⊢ aargs ,M ⇒ vargs
type of fundef(Fd) = type(a f un )
T
G ⊢ Fd(vargs ),M ⇒ ∞
(38)
T
G,E ⊢ a f un (aargs ),M ⇒ ∞
F = τ id(dcl1 ) { dcl2 ; s }
bind params(E,M1 ,dcl1 ,vargs ) = M2
alloc vars(M,dcl1 + dcl2 ,E) = (M1 ,b∗ )
T
G,E ⊢ s,M2 ⇒ ∞
(39)
T
G ⊢ F(vargs ),M ⇒ ∞
Fig. 11 Natural semantics for divergence (selected rules)
We omit the rules for switch(a) sw statements, which are standard. Based on the integer
value of a, the appropriate case of sw is selected, and the corresponding suffix of sw is
executed like a sequence, therefore implementing the “fall-through” behavior of switch
cases. A Break outcome for one of the cases terminates the switch normally.
The rules of figure 10 define the execution of a call statement a f un (aargs ) or
a = a f un (aargs ). The expression a f un is evaluated to a function pointer ptr(b, 0), and
the reference b is resolved to the corresponding function definition Fd using the global
environment G. This function definition is then invoked on the values of the arguments aargs
vres
as per the judgment G ⊢ Fd(vargs ), M ⇒
t, M ′ . If needed, the returned value vres is then
stored in the location of the l-value a (rules 30 and 31).
The invocation of an internal Clight function F (rule 32) allocates the memory required
for storing the formal parameters and the local variables of F, using the alloc_vars function. This function allocates one block for each variable id : τ , with lower bound 0 and upper
bound sizeof(τ ), using the alloc primitive of the memory model. These blocks initially
contain undef values. Then, the bind_params function iterates the storeval function in
order to initialize formal parameters to the values of the corresponding arguments.
The body of F is then executed, thus yielding an outcome (fourth premise). The return
value of F is computed from this outcome and from the return type of F (fifth premise):
for a function returning void, the body must terminate by Normal or Return and the return
value is undef; for other functions, the body must terminate by Return(v) and the return
value is v. Finally, the memory blocks b∗ that were allocated for the parameters and local
variables are freed before returning to the caller.
A call to an external function Fe simply generates an input/output event recorded in the
trace resulting from that call (rule 33).
15
G = globalenv(P) M = initmem(P)
t
symbol(G,main(P)) = ⌊b⌋ funct(G,b) = ⌊ f ⌋ G ⊢ f (nil),M ⇒ int(n),M′
(40)
⊢ P ⇒ terminates(t,n)
G = globalenv(P)
symbol(G,main(P)) = ⌊b⌋
M = initmem(P)
funct(G,b) = ⌊ f ⌋
T
G ⊢ f (nil),M ⇒ ∞
(41)
⊢ P ⇒ diverges(T )
Fig. 12 Observable behaviors of programs
3.4 Statements and function invocations, diverging case
Figure 11 shows some of the rules that model divergence of statements and function invocations. As denoted by the double horizontal bars, these rules are to be interpreted coinductively, as greatest fixpoints, instead of the standard inductive interpretation (smallest fixpoints) used for the other rules in this paper. In other words, just like terminating executions
correspond to finite derivation trees, diverging executions correspond to infinite derivation
trees [30].
A sequence s1 ; s2 diverges either if s1 diverges, or if s1 terminates normally and s2 diverges (rules 34 and 35). Likewise, a loop diverges either if its body diverges, or if it terminates normally or by continue and the next iteration of the loop diverges (rules 36 and 37).
A third case of divergence corresponds to an invocation of a function whose body diverges
(rules 38 and 39).
3.5 Program executions
Figure 12 defines the execution of a program P and the determination of its observable
behavior. A global environment and a memory state are computed for P, where each global
variable is mapped to a fresh memory block. Then, the main function of P is resolved and
applied to the empty list of arguments. If this function invocation terminates with trace t and
result value int(n), the observed behavior of P is terminates(t, n) (rule 40). If the function
invocation diverges with a possibly infinite trace T , the observed behavior is diverges(T )
(rule 41).
4 Using Clight in the CompCert compiler
In this section, we informally discuss how Clight is used in the CompCert verified compiler
[27, 6, 28].
4.1 Producing Clight abstract syntax
Going from C concrete syntax to Clight abstract syntax is not as obvious as it may sound. After an unsuccessful attempt at developing a parser, type-checker and simplifier from scratch,
we elected to reuse the CIL library of Necula et al. [33]. CIL is written in OCaml and
provides the following facilities:
16
1. A parser for ISO C99 (plus GCC and Microsoft extensions), producing a parse tree that
is still partially ambiguous.
2. A type-checker and elaborator, producing a precise, type-annotated abstract syntax tree.
3. A simplifier that replaces many delicate constructs of C by simpler constructs. For instance, function calls and assignments are pulled out of expressions and lifted to the
statement level. Also, block-scoped variables are lifted to function scope or global scope.
4. A toolkit for static analyses and transformations performed over the simplified abstract
syntax tree.
While conceptually distinct, (2) and (3) are actually performed in a single pass, avoiding the
creation of the non-simplified abstract syntax tree.
Thomas Moniot and the authors developed (in OCaml) a simple translator that produces
Clight abstract syntax from the output of CIL. Much information produced by CIL is simply
erased, such as type attributes and qualifiers. struct and union types are converted from
the original named representation to the structural representation used by Clight. String
literals are turned into global, initialized arrays of characters. Finally, constructs of C that
are unsupported in Clight are detected and meaningful diagnostics are produced.
The simplification pass of CIL sometimes goes too far for our needs. In particular, the
original CIL transforms all C loops into while(1) { ... } loops, sometimes inserting
goto statements to implement the semantics of continue. Such CIL-inserted goto statements are problematic in Clight. We therefore patched CIL to remove this simplification of
C loops and natively support while, do and for loops
CIL is an impressive but rather complex piece of code, and it has not been formally
verified. One can legitimately wonder whether we can trust CIL and our hand-written translator to preserve the semantics of C programs. Indeed, two bugs in this part of CompCert
were found during testing: one that we introduced when adding native support for for loops;
another that is present in the unmodified CIL version 1.3.6, but was corrected since then.
We see two ways to address this concern. First, we developed a pretty-printer that displays Clight abstract syntax tree in readable, C concrete syntax. This printer makes it possible to conduct manual reviews of the transformations performed by CIL. Moreover, experiment shows that re-parsing and re-transforming the simplified C syntax printed from the
Clight abstract syntax tree reaches a fixed point in one iteration most of the time. This does
not prove anything but nonetheless instills some confidence in the approach.
A more radical way to establish trust in the CIL-based Clight producer would be to
formally verify some of the simplifications performed. A prime candidate is the simplification of expressions, which transforms C expressions into equivalent pairs of a statement
(performing all side effects of the expression) and a pure expression (computing the final
value). Based on initial experiments on a simple “while” language, the Coq verification of
this simplification appears difficult but feasible. We leave this line of work for future work.
4.2 Compiling Clight
The CompCert C compiler is structured in two parts: a front-end compiler translates Clight
to an intermediate language called Cminor, without performing any optimizations; a backend compiler generates PowerPC assembly code from the Cminor intermediate representation, performing good register allocation and a few optimizations. Both parts are composed
of multiple passes. Each pass is proved to preserve semantics: if the input program P has
observable behavior B, and the pass translates P to P′ without reporting a compile-time error, then the output program P′ has the same observable behavior B. The proofs of semantic
17
preservation are conducted with the Coq proof assistant. To facilitate the proof, the compiler
passes are written directly in the specification language of Coq, as pure, recursive functions.
Executable Caml code for the compiler is then generated automatically from the functional
specifications by Coq’s extraction facility.
The back-end part of CompCert is described in great detail in [28]. We now give an
overview of the front-end, starting with a high-level overview of Cminor, its target intermediate language. (Refer to [28, section 4] for detailed specifications of Cminor.)
Cminor is a low-level imperative language, structured like Clight into expressions, statements, and functions. A first difference with Clight is that arithmetic operators are not overloaded and their behavior is independent of the static types of their operands: distinct operators are provided for integer arithmetic and floating-point arithmetic. Conversions between
integers and floats are explicit. Likewise, address computations are explicit in Cminor, as
well as individual load and store operations. For instance, the C expression a[x] where a is
a pointer to int is expressed as load(int32, a +i x *i 4), making explicit the memory
quantity being addressed (int32) as well as the address computation.
At the level of statements, Cminor has only 5 control structures: if-then-else conditionals, infinite loops, block-exit, early return, and goto with labeled statements. The exit n
statement terminates the (n + 1) enclosing block statements.
Within Cminor functions, local variables can only hold scalar values (integers, pointers,
floats) and they do not reside in memory. This makes it easy to allocate them to registers
later in the back-end, but also prohibits taking a pointer to a local variable like the C operator & does. Instead, each Cminor function declares the size of a stack-allocated block,
allocated in memory at function entry and automatically freed at function return. The expression addrstack(n) returns a pointer within that block at constant offset n. The Cminor
producer can use this block to store local arrays as well as local scalar variables whose
addresses need to be taken.
To translate from Clight to Cminor, the front-end of CompCert C therefore performs the
following transformations:
1. Resolution of operator overloading and materialization of all type-dependent behaviors.
Based on the types that annotate Clight expressions, the appropriate flavors (integer or
float) of arithmetic operators are chosen; conversions between ints and floats, truncations
and sign-extensions are introduced to reflect casts; address computations are generated
based on the types of array elements and pointer targets; and appropriate memory chunks
are selected for every memory access.
2. Translation of while, do and for loops into infinite loops with blocks and early exits.
The break and continue statements are translated as appropriate exit constructs.
3. Placement of Clight variables, either as Cminor local variables (for local scalar variables
whose address is never taken), sub-areas of the Cminor stack block for the current function (for local non-scalar variables or local scalar variables whose address is taken), or
globally allocated memory areas (for global variables).
In the first version of the front-end, developed by Zaynah Dargaye and the authors and
published in [6], the three transformations above were performed in a single pass, resulting
in a large and rather complex proof of semantic preservation. To make the proofs more
manageable, we split the front-end in two passes: the first performs transformations (1)
and (2) above, and the second performs transformation (3). A new intermediate language
called C#minor was introduced to connect the two passes. C#minor is similar to Cminor,
except that it supports a & operator to take the address of a local variable. Accordingly,
18
the semantics of C#minor, like that of Clight, allocates one memory block for each local
variable at function entrance, while the semantics of Cminor allocates only one block.
To account for this difference in allocation patterns, the proof of semantic preservation
for transformation (3) exploits the technique of memory injections formalized in [29, section
5.4]. It also involves nontrivial reasoning about separation between memory blocks and
between sub-areas of a block. The proof requires about 2200 lines of Coq, plus 800 lines for
the formalization of memory injections.
The proof of transformations (1) and (2) is more routine: since the memory states match
exactly between the original Clight and the generated C#minor, no clever reasoning over
memory states, blocks and pointers is required. The Coq proof remains relatively large (2300
lines), but mostly because many cases need to be considered, especially when resolving
overloaded operators.
5 Validating the Clight semantics
Developing a formal semantics for a real-world programming language is no small task; but
making sure that the semantics captures the intended behaviors of programs (as described,
for example, by ISO standards) is even more difficult. The smallest mistake or omission in
the rules of the semantics can render it incomplete or downright incorrect. Below, we list
a number of approaches that we considered to validate a formal semantics such as that of
Clight. Many of these approaches were prototyped but not carried to completion, and should
be considered as work in progress.
5.1 Manual reviews
The standard way to build confidence in a formal specification is to have it reviewed by
domain experts. The size of the semantics for Clight makes this approach tedious but not
downright impossible: about 800 lines of Coq for the core semantics, plus 1000 lines of Coq
for dependencies such as the formalizations of machine integers, floating-point numbers,
and the memory model. The fact that the semantics is written in a formal language such
as Coq instead of ordinary mathematics is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, the typechecking performed by Coq guarantees the absence of type errors and undefined predicates
in the specification, while such trivial errors are common in hand-written semantics. On the
other hand, domain experts might not be familiar with the formal language used and could
prefer more conventional presentations as e.g. inference rules. (We have not yet found any C
language expert who is comfortable with Coq, while several of them are fluent with inference
rules.) Manual transliteration of Coq specifications into LATEX inference rules (as we did in
this paper) is always possible but can introduce or (worse) mask errors. Better approaches
include automatic generation of LATEX from formal specifications, like Isabelle/HOL and Ott
do [35, 43].
5.2 Proving properties of the semantics
The primary use of formal semantics is to prove properties of programs and meta-properties
of the semantics. Such proofs, especially when conducted on machine, are effective at revealing errors in the semantics. For example, in the case of strongly-typed languages, type
19
soundness proofs (showing that well-typed programs do not go wrong) are often used for
this purpose. In the case of Clight, a type soundness proof is not very informative, since the
type system of C is coarse and unsound to begin with: the best we could hope for is a subject
reduction property, but the progress property does not hold. Less ambitious sanity checks
include “common sense” properties such as those of the field_offset function mentioned
at end of section 2.1, as well as determinism of evaluation, which we obtained as a corollary
of the verification of the CompCert compiler [28, sections 2.1 and 13.3].
5.3 Verified translations
Extending the previous approach to proving properties involving two formal semantics instead of one, we found that proving semantics preservation for a translation from one language to another is effective at exposing errors not only in the translation algorithm, but
also in the semantics of the two languages involved. If the translation “looks right” to compiler experts and the semantics of the target language has already been debugged, such a
proof of semantic preservation therefore generates confidence in the semantics of the source
language. In the case of CompCert, the semantics of the Cminor intermediate language is
smaller (300 lines) and much simpler than that of Clight; subsequent intermediate languages
in the back-end such as RTL are even simpler, culminating in the semantics of the PPC
assembly language, which is a large but conceptually trivial transition function [28]. The
existence of semantic-preserving translations between these languages therefore constitutes
an indirect validation of their semantics.
Semantic preservation proofs and type soundness proofs detect different kinds of errors
in semantics. For a trivial example, assume that the Clight semantics erroneously interprets
the + operator at type int as integer subtraction. This error would not invalidate an hypothetical type soundness proof, but would show up immediately in the proof of semantic
preservation for the CompCert front-end, assuming of course that we did not commit the
same error in the translations nor in the semantics of Cminor. On the other hand, a type
soundness proof can reveal that an evaluation rule is missing (this shows up as failures of
the progress property). A semantic preservation proof can point out a missing rule in the
semantics of the target language but not in the semantics of the source language, since it
takes as hypothesis that the source program does not go wrong.
5.4 Testing executable semantics
Just like programs, formal specifications can be tested against test suites that exemplifies
expected behaviors. An impressive example of this approach is the HOL specification of the
TCP/IP protocol by Sewell et al. [5], which was extensively validated against network traces
generated by actual implementations of the protocol.
In the case of formal semantics, testing requires that the semantics is executable: there
must exist an effective way to determine the result of a given program in a given initial environment. The Coq proof assistant does not provide efficient ways to execute a specification
written using inductive predicates such as our semantics for Clight. (But see [11] for ongoing work in this direction.) As discussed in [3], the eauto tactic of Coq, which performs
Prolog-style resolution, can sometimes be used as the poor man’s logic interpreter to execute inductive predicates. However, the Clight semantics is too large and not syntax-directed
enough to render this approach effective.
20
On the other hand, Coq provides excellent facilities for executing specifications written
as recursive functions: an interpreter is built in the Coq type-checker to perform conversion
tests; Coq 8.0 introduced a bytecode compiler to a virtual machine, speeding up the evaluation of Coq terms by one order of magnitude [15]; finally, the extraction facility of Coq
can also be used to generate executable Caml code. The recommended approach to execute
a Coq specification by inductive predicates, therefore, is to define a reference interpreter
as a Coq function, prove its equivalence with the inductive specification, and evaluate applications of the function. Since Coq demands that all recursive functions terminate, these
interpretation functions are often parameterized by a nonnegative integer counter n bounding the depth of the evaluation. Taking the execution of Clight statements as an example, the
corresponding interpretation function is of the shape
exec stmt(W, n, G, E, M, s) = Bottom(t) | Result(t, out, M ′ ) | Error
where n is the maximal recursion depth, G, E, M are the initial state, and s the statement
to execute. The result of execution is either Error, meaning that execution goes wrong, or
Result(t, out, M ′ ), meaning that execution terminates with trace t, outcome out and final
memory state M ′ , or Bottom(t), meaning that the maximal recursion depth was exceeded
after producing the partial trace t. To handle the non-determinism introduced by input/output
operations, exec_stmt is parameterized over a world W : a partial function that determines
the result of an input/output operation as a function of its arguments and the input/output
operation previously performed [28, section 13.1].
The following two properties characterize the correctness of the exec_stmt function
with respect to the inductive specification of the semantics:
t
G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ out, M ′ ∧ W |= t ⇔ ∃n, exec stmt(W, n, G, E, M, s) = Result(t, out, M)
T
G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ ∞ ∧ W |= T ⇔ ∀n, ∃t, exec stmt(W, n, G, E, M, s) = Bottom(t)
∧ t is a prefix of T
Here, W |= t means that the trace t is consistent with the world W , in the sense of [28, section
13.1]. See [30] for detailed proofs of these properties in the simpler case of call-by-value λ calculus without traces. The proof of the second property requires classical reasoning with
the axiom of excluded middle.
We are currently implementing the approach outlined above, although it is not finished
at the time of this writing. Given the availability of the CompCert verified compiler, one
may wonder what is gained by using a reference Clight interpreter to run tests, instead of
just compiling them with CompCert and executing the generated PowerPC assembly code.
We believe that nothing is gained for test programs with well-defined semantics. However,
the reference interpreter enables us to check that programs with undefined semantics do go
wrong, while the CompCert compiler can (and often does) turn them into correct PowerPC
code.
5.5 Equivalence with alternate semantics
Yet another way to validate a formal semantics is to write several alternate semantics for the
same language, using different styles of semantics, and prove logical implications between
them. In the case of the Cminor intermediate language and with the help of Andrew Appel,
we developed three semantics: (1) a big-step operational semantics in the style of the Clight
semantics described in the present paper [27]; (2) a small-step, continuation-based semantics
21
[2, 28]; (3) an axiomatic semantics based on separation logic [2]. Semantics (1) and (3) were
proved correct against semantics (2). Likewise, for Clight and with the help of Keiko Nakata,
we prototyped (but did not complete yet) three alternate semantics to the big-step operational
semantics presented in this paper: (1) a small-step, continuation-based semantics; (2) the
reference interpreter outlined above; (3) an axiomatic semantics.
Proving the correctness of a semantics with respect to another is an effective way to find
mistakes in both. For instance, the correctness of an axiomatic semantics against a big-step
operational semantics without traces can be stated as follows: if {P}s{Q} is a valid Hoare
triple, then for all initial states G, E, M satisfying the precondition P, either the statement s
diverges (G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ ∞) or it terminates (G, E ⊢ s, M ⇒ out, M ′ ) and the outcome out and
the final state G, E, M ′ satisfy postcondition Q. The proof of this property exercises all cases
of the big-step operational semantics and is effective at pointing out mistakes and omissions
in the latter. Extending this approach to traces raises delicate issues that we have not solved
yet. First, the axiomatic semantics must be extended with ways for the postconditions Q
to assert properties of the traces generated by the execution of the statement s. A possible
source of inspiration is the recent work by Hoare and O’Hearn [20]. Second, in the case of
a loop such as {P} while(a) s {Q}, we must not only show that the loop either terminates
or diverges without going wrong, as in the earlier proof, but also prove the existence of the
corresponding traces of events. In the diverging case, this runs into technical problems with
Coq’s guardedness restrictions on coinductive definitions and proofs.
In the examples given above, the various semantics were written by the same team and
share some elements, such as the memory model and the semantics of Clight expressions.
Mistakes in the shared parts will obviously not show up during the equivalence proofs.
Relating two independently-written semantics would provide a more convincing validation.
In our case, an obvious candidate for comparison with Clight is the Cholera semantics of
Norrish [36]. There are notable differences between our semantics and Cholera, discussed
in section 6, but we believe that our semantics is a refinement of the Cholera model. A
practical issue with formalizing this intuition is that Cholera is formalized in HOL while our
semantics is formalized in Coq.
6 Related work
Mechanized semantics for C The work closest to ours is Norrish’s Cholera project [36],
which formalizes the static and dynamic semantics of a large subset of C using the HOL
proof assistant. Unlike Clight, Cholera supports side effects within expressions and accounts
for the partially specified evaluation order of C. For this purpose, the semantics of expressions is given in small-step style as a non-deterministic reduction relation, while the semantics of statements is given in big-step style. Norrish used this semantics to characterize
precisely the amount of non-determinism allowed by the C standard [37]. Also, the memory
model underlying Cholera is more abstract than that of Clight, leaving unspecified a number
of behaviors that Clight specifies.
Tews et al [46, 47] developed a denotational semantics for a subset of the C++ language.
The semantics is presented as a shallow embedding in the PVS prover. Expressions and
statements are modeled as state transformers: functions from initial states to final states plus
value (for expressions) or outcome (for statements). The subset of C++ handled is close to
our Clight, with a few differences: side effects within expressions are allowed (and treated
using a fixed evaluation order); the behavior of arithmetic operations in case of overflow is
22
not specified; the goto statement is not handled, but the state transformer approach could be
extended to do so [45].
Using the Coq proof assistant, Giménez and Ledinot [14] define a denotational semantics for a subset of C appropriate as target language for the compilation of the Lustre synchronous dataflow language. Owing to the particular shape of Lustre programs, the subset
of C does not contain general loops nor recursive functions, but only counted for loops.
Pointer arithmetic is not supported.
As part of the Verisoft project [40], the semantics of a subset of C called C0 has been
formalized using Isabelle/HOL, as well as the correctness of a compiler from C0 to DLX assembly language [26, 44, 41]. C0 is a type-safe subset of C, close to Pascal, and significantly
smaller than Clight: for instance, there is no pointer arithmetic, nor break and continue
statements. A big-step semantics and a small-step semantics have been defined for C0, the
latter enabling reasoning about non-terminating executions.
Paper and pencil semantics for C Papaspyrou [39] develops a monadic denotational semantics for most of ISO C. Non-determinism in expression evaluation is modeled precisely. The
semantics was validated by testing with the help of a reference interpreter written in Haskell.
Nepomniaschy et al. [34] define a big-step semantics for a subset of C similar to Pascal:
it supports limited uses of goto statements, but not pointer arithmetic.
Abstract state machines have been used to give semantics for C [16] and for C# [7].
The latter formalization is arguably the most complete (in terms of the number of language
features handled) formal semantics for an imperative language.
Other examples of mechanized semantics Proof assistants were used to mechanize semantics for languages that are higher-level than C. Representative examples include [23, 25] for
Standard ML, [38] for a subset of OCaml, and [24] for a subset of Java. Other Java-related
mechanized verifications are surveyed in [18]. Many of these semantics were validated by
conducting type soundness proofs.
Subsets of C Many uses of C in embedded or critical applications mandate strict coding
guidelines restricting programmers to a “safer” subset of C [19]. A well-known example is
MISRA C [32]. MISRA C and Clight share some restrictions (such as structured switch
statements with default cases at the end), but otherwise differ significantly. For instance,
MISRA C prohibits recursive functions, but permits all uses of goto. More generally, the
restrictions of MISRA C and related guidelines are driven by software engineering considerations and the desire for tool-assisted checking, while the restrictions of Clight stem from
the desire to keep its formal semantics manageable.
Several tools for static analysis and deductive verification of C programs use simplified
subsets of C as intermediate representations. We already discussed the CIL intermediate
representation [33]. Other examples include the Frama-C intermediate representation [8],
which extends CIL’s with logical assertions, and the Newspeak representation [22]. CIL is
richer than Clight and accurately represents all of ISO C plus some extensions. Newspeak is
lower-level than Clight and targeted more towards static analysis than towards compilation.
7 Conclusions and future work
In this article, we have formally defined the Clight subset of the C programming language
and its dynamic semantics. While there is no general agreement on the formal semantics of
23
the C language, we believe that Clight is a reasonable proposal that works well in the context
of the formal verification of a compiler. We hope that, in the future, Clight might be useful
in other contexts such as static analyzers and program provers and their formal verification.
Several extensions of Clight can be considered. One direction, discussed in [29], is to
relax the memory model so as to model byte- and bit-level accesses to in-memory data
representations, as is commonly done in systems programming.
Another direction is to add support for some of the C constructs currently missing, in
particular the goto statement. The main issue here is to formalize the dynamic semantics of
goto in a way that lends itself well to proofs. Natural semantics based on statement outcomes
can be extended with support for goto by following the approach proposed by Tews [45],
but at the cost of nearly doubling the size of the semantics. Support for goto statements is
much easier to add to transition semantics based on continuations, as the Cminor semantics
exemplifies [28, section 4]. However, such transition semantics do not lend themselves easily
to proving transformations of loops such as those performed by the front-end of CompCert
(transformation 2 in section 4.2).
Finally, the restriction that Clight expressions are pure is both a blessing and a curse:
on the one hand, it greatly simplifies all further processing of Clight, be it compilation,
static analysis or program verification; on the other hand, programmers cannot be expected
to directly write programs where all expressions are pure, requiring nontrivial, untrusted
program transformations in the Clight parser. One way to address this issue would be to
define an extension of Clight, tentatively called Cmedium, that supports side effects within
expressions, and develop and prove correct a translation from Cmedium to Clight.
References
1. Aiken, A., Bugrara, S., Dillig, I., Dillig, T., Hackett, B., Hawkins, P.: An overview of the Saturn project.
In: PASTE ’07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for
software tools and engineering, pp. 43–48. ACM Press (2007)
2. Appel, A.W., Blazy, S.: Separation logic for small-step Cminor. In: Theorem Proving in Higher Order
Logics, 20th Int. Conf. TPHOLs 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4732, pp. 5–21. Springer
(2007)
3. Appel, A.W., Leroy, X.: A list-machine benchmark for mechanized metatheory (extended abstract). In:
Proc. Int. Workshop on Logical Frameworks and Meta-Languages (LFMTP’06), Electronic Notes in
Computer Science, vol. 174/5, pp. 95–108 (2007)
4. Bertot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development – Coq’Art: The Calculus
of Inductive Constructions. EATCS Texts in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer (2004)
5. Bishop, S., Fairbairn, M., Norrish, M., Sewell, P., Smith, M., Wansbrough, K.: Engineering with logic:
HOL specification and symbolic-evaluation testing for TCP implementations. In: 33rd Symposium on
Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 55–66. ACM Press (2006)
6. Blazy, S., Dargaye, Z., Leroy, X.: Formal verification of a C compiler front-end. In: FM 2006: 14th Int.
Symp. on Formal Methods, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4085, pp. 460–475. Springer (2006)
7. Börger, E., Fruja, N., Gervasi, V., Stärk, R.F.: A high-level modular definition of the semantics of C#.
Theoretical Computer Science 336(2-3), 235–284 (2005)
8. CEA LIST: FRAMA-C: Framework for modular analysis of C. Software and documentation available
on the Web (2008). URL http://frama-c.cea.fr/
9. Condit, J., Harren, M., McPeak, S., Necula, G.C., Weimer, W.: CCured in the real world. In: PLDI ’03:
Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 conference on Programming language design and implementation, pp. 232–244. ACM Press (2003)
10. Coq development team: The Coq proof assistant. Software and documentation available on the Web
(1989-2008). URL http://coq.inria.fr/
11. Delahaye, D., Dubois, C., Étienne, J.F.: Extracting purely functional contents from logical inductive
types. In: Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, 20th International Conference, TPHOLs 2007,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4732, pp. 70–85. Springer (2007)
24
12. Duff, T.: On Duff’s device (1988). URL http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/duffs-device.html.
Message to the comp.lang.c Usenet group
13. Filliâtre, J.C., Marché, C.: Multi-prover verification of C programs. In: 6th Int. Conference on Formal
Engineering Methods, ICFEM 2004, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3308, pp. 15–29 (2004)
14. Gimenez, E., Ledinot, E.: Semantics of a subset of the C language (2004).
URL
http://coq.inria.fr/contribs/minic.html . Coq contributed library
15. Grégoire, B., Leroy, X.: A compiled implementation of strong reduction. In: International Conference
on Functional Programming (ICFP 2002), pp. 235–246. ACM Press (2002)
16. Gurevich, Y., Huggins, J.: The semantics of the C programming language. In: Computer Science Logic,
6th Workshop, CSL ’92, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 702, pp. 274–308. Springer (1993)
17. Hardekopf, B., Lin, C.: The ant and the grasshopper: fast and accurate pointer analysis for millions of
lines of code. SIGPLAN Notices 42(6), 290–299 (2007)
18. Hartel, P.H., Moreau, L.: Formalizing the safety of Java, the Java virtual machine, and Java card. ACM
Computing Surveys 33(4), 517–558 (2001)
19. Hatton, L.: Safer language subsets: an overview and a case history, MISRA C. Information & Software
Technology 46(7), 465–472 (2004)
20. Hoare, T., O’Hearn, P.W.: Separation logic semantics for communicating processes. In: Proceedings of
the First International Conference on Foundations of Informatics, Computing and Software (FICS 2008),
Electronic Notes in Computer Science, vol. 212, pp. 3–25 (2008)
21. Huisman, M., Jacobs, B.: Java program verification via a Hoare logic with abrupt termination. In: Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 3rd Int. Conf. FASE 2000, Lecture Notes in Computer
Science, vol. 1783, pp. 284–303. Springer (2000)
22. Hymans, C., Levillain, O.: Newspeak, doubleplussimple minilang for goodthinkful static analysis of C.
Technical note 2008-IW-SE-00010-1, EADS (2008)
23. van Inwegen, M., Gunter, E.L.: HOL-ML. In: Higher Order Logic Theorem Proving and its Applications,
6th International Workshop, HUG ’93, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 780, pp. 61–74. Springer
(1993)
24. Klein, G., Nipkow, T.: A machine-checked model for a Java-like language, virtual machine, and compiler.
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 28(4), 619–695 (2006)
25. Lee, D.K., Crary, K., Harper, R.: Towards a mechanized metatheory of Standard ML. In: 34th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 173–184. ACM Press (2007)
26. Leinenbach, D., Paul, W., Petrova, E.: Towards the formal verification of a C0 compiler: Code generation
and implementation correctness. In: IEEE Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods
(SEFM’05), pp. 2–11. IEEE Computer Society Press (2005)
27. Leroy, X.: Formal certification of a compiler back-end, or: programming a compiler with a proof assistant. In: 33rd ACM symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, pp. 42–54. ACM Press
(2006)
28. Leroy,
X.:
A
formally
verified
compiler
backend
(2008).
URL
http://gallium.inria.fr/~ xleroy/publi/compcert-backend.pdf.
Submitted for publication
29. Leroy, X., Blazy, S.: Formal verification of a C-like memory model and its uses for verifying program
transformations. Journal on Automated Reasoning 41(1), 1–31 (2008)
30. Leroy, X., Grall, H.: Coinductive big-step operational semantics. Information and Computation (2007).
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ic.2007.12.004. To appear
31. Milner, R., Tofte, M., Harper, R., MacQueen, D.: The definition of Standard ML (revised). The MIT
Press (1997)
32. Motor Industry Software Reliability Association: MISRA-C. http://www.misra-c.com/ (2004)
33. Necula, G.C., McPeak, S., Rahul, S.P., Weimer, W.: CIL: Intermediate language and tools for analysis
and transformation of C programs. In: Compiler Construction, 11th International Conference, CC 2002,
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2304, pp. 213–228. Springer (2002)
34. Nepomniaschy, V.A., Anureev, I.S., Promsky, A.V.: Towards verification of C programs: Axiomatic semantics of the C-kernel language. Programming and Computer Software 29(6), 338–350 (2003)
35. Nipkow, T., Paulson, L.C.: Isabelle/Hol: A Proof Assistant for Higher-Order Logic. Springer (2004)
36. Norrish, M.: C formalised in HOL. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (1998). Technical report
UCAM-CL-TR-453
37. Norrish, M.: Deterministic expressions in C. In: Programming Languages and Systems, 8th European
Symposium on Programming, ESOP’99, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1576, pp. 147–161.
Springer (1999)
38. Owens, S.: A sound semantics for OCamllight. In: Programming Languages and Systems, 17th European
Symposium on Programming, ESOP 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4960, pp. 1–15.
Springer (2008)
25
39. Papaspyrou, N.: A formal semantics for the C programming language. Ph.D. thesis, National Technical
University of Athens (1998)
40. Paul, W., et al.: The Verisoft project (2003–2008). URL http://www.verisoft.de/
41. Schirmer, N.: Verification of sequential imperative programs in Isabelle/HOL. Ph.D. thesis, Technische
Universität München (2006)
42. Sen, K., Marinov, D., Agha, G.: CUTE: a concolic unit testing engine for C. In: ESEC/FSE-13: Proceedings of the 10th European software engineering conference, pp. 263–272. ACM Press (2005)
43. Sewell, P., Zappa Nardelli, F., Owens, S., Peskine, G., Ridge, T., Sarkar, S., Strnisa, R.: Ott: effective tool
support for the working semanticist. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Functional
Programming, pp. 1–12. ACM Press (2007)
44. Strecker, M.: Compiler verification for C0. Tech. rep., Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse (2005)
45. Tews, H.: Verifying Duff’s device: A simple compositional denotational semantics for goto and computed
jumps (2004). URL http://www.cs.ru.nl/~ tews/Goto/goto.pdf. Draft paper
46. Tews, H., Weber, T., Völp, M.: A formal model of memory peculiarities for the verification of low-level
operating-system code. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Systems Software Verification
(SSV’08), Electronic Notes in Computer Science, vol. 217, pp. 79–96 (2008)
47. Tews, H., Weber, T., Völp, M., Poll, E., van Eekelen, M., van Rossum, P.: Nova micro-hypervisor
verification.
Robin project deliverable D13, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen (2008).
URL
http://robin.tudos.org/D.13%20Formal%20Verification.pdf
48. Zucker, S., Karhi, K.: System V application binary interface, PowerPC processor supplement. Tech. Rep.
802-3334-10, SunSoft (1995)
| 6cs.PL
|
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
arXiv:1011.2083v4 [math.GR] 10 Mar 2016
MANOJ K. YADAV
Abstract. In 1904, Issai Schur proved the following result. If G is an arbitrary group such
that G/ Z(G) is finite, where Z(G) denotes the center of the group G, then the commutator
subgroup of G is finite. A partial converse of this result was proved by B. H. Neumann in
1951. He proved that if G is a finitely generated group with finite commutator subgroup, then
G/ Z(G) is finite. In this short note, we exhibit few arguments of Neumann, which provide
further generalizations of converse of the above mentioned result of Schur. We classify all
finite groups G such that |G/ Z(G)| = |γ2 (G)|d , where d denotes the number of elements in a
minimal generating set for G/ Z(G). Some problems and questions are posed in the sequel.
1. Introduction
In 1951, Neumann [18, Theorem 5.3] proved the following result: If the index of Z(G) in
G is finite, then γ2 (G) is finite, where Z(G) and γ2 (G) denote the center and the commutator
subgroup of G respectively. He mentioned [19, End of page 237] that this result can be obtained
from an implicit idea of Schur [23], and his proof also used Schur’s basic idea. However there is
no mention of this fact in [18] in which Schur’s paper is also cited. In this note, this result will
be termed as ‘the Schur’s theorem’. Neumann also provided a partial converse of the Schur’s
theorem [18, Corollary 5.41] as follows: If G is finitely generated by k elements and γ2 (G) is
finite, then G/ Z(G) is finite, and bounded by |G/ Z(G)| ≤ |γ2 (G)|k .
Our first motivation of writing this note is to exhibit an idea of Neumann[18, page 179] which
proves much more than what is said above on converse of the Schur’s theorem. We quote the
text here (with a minor modification in the notations):
“Let G be generated by g1 , g2 , . . . , gk . Then
Z(G) = ∩κ=k
κ=1 CG (gκ );
for, an element of G lies in the centre if and only if it (is permutable) commutes with all the
generators of G. If G is an FC-group (group whose all conjugacy classes are of finite length),
then |G : CG (gκ )| is finite for 1 ≤ κ ≤ k, and Z(G), as intersection of a finite set of subgroups
of finite index, also has finite index. The index of the intersection of two subgroups does not
exceed the product of the indices of the subgroups: hence in this case one obtains an upper bound
for the index of the centre, namely
|G : Z(G)| ≤ Πκ=k
κ=1 |G : CG (gκ )|.”
Just a soft staring at the quoted text for a moment or two suggests the following. The
conclusion does not require the group G to be FC-group. It only requires the finiteness of the
conjugacy classes of the generating elements. If a generator of the group G is contained in
Z(G), one really does not need to count it. Thus the argument works perfactly well even if G is
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 20F24, 20E45.
Key words and phrases. commutator subgroup, Schur’s theorem, class-preserving automorphism.
1
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
2
generated by infinite number of elements, all but finite of them lie in the center of G. Thus the
following result holds true.
Theorem A. Let G be an arbitrary group such that G/ Z(G) is finitely generated by x1 Z(G),
x2 Z(G), . . . , xt Z(G) and the conjugacy class of xi in G is of finite length for 1 ≤ i ≤ t. Then
G
G/ Z(G) is finite. Moreover |G/ Z(G)| ≤ Πti=1 |xG
i | and γ2 (G) is finite, where xi denotes the
conjugacy class of xi in G.
Neumann’s result [18, Corollary 5.41] was reproduced by Hilton [12, Theorem 1]. It seems
that Hilton was not aware of Neumann’s result. This lead two more publications [21] and [24]
dedicated to proving special cases of Theorem A.
Converse of the Schur’s theorem is not true in general as shown by infinite extraspecial pgroups, where p is an odd prime. It is interesting to know that example of such a 2-group also
exists, which is mentioned on page 238 (second para of Section 3) of [19]. It is a central product
of infinite copies of quaternion groups of order 8 amalgamated at the center of order 2.
Our second motivation of writing this note is to provide a modification of an innocent looking
result of Neumann [20, Lemma 2], which allows us to say little more on converse of the Schur’s
theorem. A modified version of this lemma is the following.
Lemma 1.1. Let G be an arbitrary group having a normal abelian subgroup A such that the
index of CG (A) in G is finite and G/A is finitely generated by g1 A, g2 A, . . . , gr A, where |giG | < ∞
for 1 ≤ i ≤ r. Then G/Z(G) is finite.
This lemma helps proving the first three statements of the following result.
Theorem B. For an arbitrary group G, G/ Z(G) is finite if any one of the following holds true:
(i) Z2 (G)/ Z(Z2 (G)) is finitely generated and γ2 (G) is finite.
(ii) G/ Z(Z2 (G)) is finitely generated and G/(Z2 (G)γ2 (G)) is finite.
(iii) γ2 (G) is finite and Z2 (G) ≤ γ2 (G).
(iv) γ2 (G) is finite and G/ Z(G) is purely non-abelian.
Our final motivation is to provide a classification of all groups G upto isoclinism (see Section
3 for the definition) such that |G/ Z(G)| = |γ2 (G)|d is finite, where d denotes the number of
elements in a minimal generating set for G/ Z(G), discuss example in various situations and pose
some problems. We conclude this section with fixing some notations. For an arbitrary group
G, by Z(G), Z2 (G) and γ2 (G) we denote the center, the second center and the commutator
subgroup of G respectively. For x ∈ G, [x, G] denotes the set {[x, g] | g ∈ G}. Notice that
|[x, G]| = |xG |, where xG denotes the conjugacy class of x in G. If [x, G] ⊆ Z(G), then [x, G]
becomes a subgroup of G. For a subgroup H of G, CG (H) denotes the centralizer of H in G
and for an element x ∈ G, CG (x) denotes the centralizer of x in G.
2. Proofs
We start with the proof of Lemma 1.1, which is essentialy same as the one given by Neumann.
Proof of Lemma 1.1. Let G/A be generated by g1 A, g2 A, . . . , gr A for some gi ∈ G, where
1 ≤ i ≤ r < ∞. Let X := {g1 , g2 , . . . , gr } and A be generated by a set Y . Then G = hX ∪ Y i
and Z(G) = CG (X) ∩ CG (Y ). Notice that CG (A) = CG (Y ). Since CG (A) is of finite index,
CG (Y ) is also of finite index in G. Also, since |giG | < ∞ for 1 ≤ i ≤ r, CG (X) is of finite index
in G. Hence the index of Z(G) in G is finite and the proof is complete.
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
3
Proof of Theorem A can be made quite precise by using Lemma 1.1.
Proof of Theorem A. Taking A = Z(G) in Lemma 1.1, it follows that G/ Z(G) is finite.
Moreover,
|G/ Z(G)| = |G/ ∩ti=1 CG (xi )| ≤ Πti=1 |G : CG (xi )| = Πti=1 |[xi , G]| = Πti=1 |xG
i |.
That γ2 (G) is finite now follows from the Schur’s theorem.
For the proof of Theorem B we need the following result of Hall [9] and the subsequent
proposition.
Theorem 2.1. If G is an arbitrary group such that γ2 (G) is finite, then G/ Z2 (G) is finite.
Explicit bounds on the order of G/ Z2 (G) were first given by Macdonald [14, Theorem 6.2] and
later on improved by Podoski and Szegedy [22] by showing that if |γ2 (G)/(γ2 (G) ∩ Z(G))| = n,
then |G/ Z2 (G)| ≤ nc log2 n with c = 2.
Proposition 2.2. Let G be an arbitrary group such that γ2 (G) is finite and G/ Z(G) is infinite.
Then G/ Z(G) has an infinite abelian group as a direct factor.
Proof. Since γ2 (G) is finite, by Theorem 2.1 G/ Z2 (G) is finite. Thus Z2 (G)/ Z(G) is infinite.
Again using the finiteness of γ2 (G), it follows that the exponent of Z2 (G)/ Z(G) is finite. Hence
by [6, Theorem 17.2] Z2 (G)/ Z(G) is a direct sum of cyclic groups. Let G/ Z2 (G) be generated
by x1 Z2 (G), . . . , xr Z2 (G) and H := hx1 , . . . , xr i. Then it follows that modulo Z(G), H ∩ Z2 (G)
is finite. Thus we can write
Z2 (G)/ Z(G) = hy1 Z(G)i × · · · × hys Z(G)i × hys+1 Z(G)i × · · · ,
such that (H ∩ Z2 (G)) Z(G)/ Z(G) ≤ hy1 Z(G)i × · · · × hys Z(G)i. It now follows that the infinite
abelian group hys+1 Z(G)i × · · · is a direct factor of G/ Z(G), and the proof is complete.
We are now ready to prove Theorem B.
Proof of Theorem B. Since γ2 (G) is finite, it follows from Theorem 2.1 that G/ Z2 (G) is finite.
Now using the fact that Z2 (G)/ Z(Z2 (G)) is finitely generated, it follows that G/ Z(Z2 (G)) is
finitely generated. Take Z(Z2 (G)) = A. Then notice that A is a normal abelian subgroup of
G such that the index of CG (A) in G is finite, since Z2 (G) ≤ CG (A). Hence by Lemma 1.1,
G/ Z(G) is finite, which proves (i).
Again take Z(Z2 (G)) = A and notice that Z2 (G)γ2 (G) ≤ CG (A). (ii) now directly follows
from Lemma 1.1. If Z2 (G) ≤ γ2 (G), then Z2 (G) is abelian. Thus (iii) follows from (i). Finally,
(iv) follows from Proposition 2.2. This completes the proof of the theorem.
We conclude this section with an extension of Theorem A in terms of conjugacy classpreserving automorphisms of given group G. An automorphism α of an arbitrary group G
is called (conjugacy) class-preserving if α(g) ∈ g G for all g ∈ G. We denote the group of all
class-preserving automorphisms of G by Autc (G). Notice that Inn(G), the group of all inner
automorphisms of G, is a normal subgroup of Autc (G) and Autc (G) acts trivially on the center
of G. A detailed survey on class-preserving automorphisms of finite p-groups can be found in
[25].
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
4
Let G be the group as in the statement of Theorem A. Then G is generated by x1 , x2 , . . . , xt
along with Z(G). Since Autc (G) acts trivially on the center of G, it follows that
(2.3)
| Autc (G)| ≤ Πti=1 |xG
i |
as there are only |xG
i | choices for the image of each xi under any class-preserving automorphism.
G
Since |xi | is finite for each xi , 1 ≤ i ≤ t, it follows that | Autc (G)| ≤ Πti=1 |xG
i | is finite.
We have proved the following result of which Theorem A is a corollary, because |G/ Z(G)| =
| Inn(G)| ≤ | Autc (G)|.
Theorem 2.4. Let G be an arbitrary group such that G/ Z(G) is finitely generated by x1 Z(G),
x2 Z(G), . . . , xt Z(G) and the conjugacy class of xi in G is of finite length for 1 ≤ i ≤ t. Then
Autc (G) is finite. Moreover | Autc (G)| ≤ Πti=1 |xG
i | and γ2 (G) is finite.
Proof of Theorem A is also reproduced using IA-automorphisms (automorphisms of a group
that induce identity on the abelianization) in [7, Theorem 2.3]. Proof goes on the same way as
in the case of class-preserving automorphisms.
3. Groups with maximal central quotient
We start with the following concept due to Hall [8]. For a group X, the commutator map
aX : X/ Z(X) × X/ Z(X) → γ2 (X) given by aX (x1 Z(X), x2 Z(X)) = [x1 , x2 ] is well defined.
Two groups K and H are said to be isoclinic if there exists an isomorphism φ of the factor
group K̄ = K/ Z(K) onto H̄ = H/ Z(H), and an isomorphism θ of the subgroup γ2 (K) onto
γ2 (H) such that the following diagram is commutative
a
K̄ × K̄ −−−G−→ γ2 (K)
φ×φy
yθ
a
H̄ × H̄ −−−H−→ γ2 (H).
The resulting pair (φ, θ) is called an isoclinism of K onto H. Notice that isoclinism is an
equivalence relation among groups.
The following proposition (also see Macdonald’s result [14, Lemma 2.1]) is important for the
rest of this section.
Proposition 3.1. Let G be a group such that G/ Z(G) is finite. Then there exists a finite group
H isoclinic to the group G such that Z(H) ≤ γ2 (H). Moreover if G is a p-group, then H is also
a p-group.
Proof. Let G be the given group. Then by Schur’s theorem γ2 (G) is finite. Now it follows from
a result of Hall [8] that there exists a group H which is isoclinic to G and Z(H) ≤ γ2 (H). Since
|γ2 (G)| = |γ2 (H)| is finite, Z(H) is finite. Hence, by the definition of isoclinism, H is finite.
Now suppose that G is a p-groups. Then it follows that H/ Z(H) as well as γ2 (H) are p-groups.
Since Z(H) ≤ γ2 (H), this implies that H is a p-group.
For an arbitrary group G with finite G/ Z(G), we have
(3.2)
|G/ Z(G)| ≤ |γ2 (G)|d ,
where d = d(G/ Z(G)). For simplicity we say that a group G has Property A if G/ Z(G) is finite
and equality holds in (3.2) for G. We are now going to classify, upto isoclinism, all groups G
having Property A.
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
5
Let G be an arbitrary group having Property A. Then by Proposition 3.1 there exists a finite
group H isoclinic to G and, by the definition of isoclinism, H has Property A. Thus for classifying
all groups G, upto isoclinism, having Property A, it is sufficient to classify all finite group with
this property.
Let us first consider non-nilpotent finite groups. For such group we prove the following result
in [5]
Theorem 3.3. There is no non-nilpotent group G having Property A.
So we only need to consider finite nilpotent groups. Since a finite nilpotent group is a direct
product of it’s Sylow p-subgroups, it is sufficient to classify finite p-groups admitting Property A.
Obviously, all abelian groups admit Property A. Perhaps the simplest examples of non-abelian
groups having Property A are finite extraspecial p-groups. The class of 2-generated finite capable
nilpotent groups with cyclic commutator subgroup also admits Property A. A group G is said
∼ H/ Z(H). Isaacs [13, Theorem 2] proved:
to be capable if there exists a group H such that G =
Let G be finite and capable, and suppose that γ2 (G) is cyclic and that all elements of order 4
in γ2 (G) are central in G. Then |G/ Z(G)| ≤ |γ2 (G)|2 , and equality holds if G is nilpotent. So
G admits Property A, if G is a nilpotent group as in this statement and G is 2-generated. A
complete classification of 2-generated finite capable p-groups of class 2 is given in [15].
Motivated by finite extraspecial p-groups, a more general class of groups G admitting Property
A can be constructed as follows. For any positive integer m, let G1 , G2 , . . . , Gm be 2-generated
finite p-groups such that γ2 (Gi ) = Z(Gi ) ∼
= X (say) is cyclic of order q for 1 ≤ i ≤ m, where q
is some power of p. Consider the central product
(3.4)
Y = G1 ∗X G2 ∗X · · · ∗X Gm
of G1 , G2 , . . . , Gm amalgamated at X (isomorphic to cyclic commutator subgroups γ2 (Gi ), 1 ≤
i ≤ m). Then |Y | = q 2m+1 and |Y / Z(Y )| = q 2m = |γ2 (Y )|d(Y ) , where d(Y ) = 2m is the number
of elements in any minimal generating set for Y . Thus Y has Property A. Notice that in all of
the above examples, the commutator subgroup is cyclic. Infinite groups having Property A can
be easily obtained by taking a direct product of an infinite abelian group with any finite group
having Property A.
We now proceed to showing that any finite p-group G of class 2 having Property A is isoclinic
to a group Y defined in (3.4).
Let x ∈ Z2 (G) for a group G. Then, notice that [x, G] is a central subgroup of G. We have
the following simple but useful result.
Lemma 3.5. Let G be an arbitrary group such that Z2 (G)/ Z(G) is finitely generated by x1 Z(G),
x2 Z(G), . . . , xt Z(G) such that exp([xi , G]) is finite for 1 ≤ i ≤ t. Then
| Z2 (G)/ Z(G)| =
t
Y
exp([xi , G]).
i=1
Proof. By the given hypothesis exp([xi , G]) is finite for all i such that 1 ≤ i ≤ t. Suppose that
exp([xi , G]) = ni . Since [xi , G] ⊆ Z(G), it follows that [xni i , G] = [xi , G]ni = 1. Thus xni i ∈ Z(G)
and no smaller power of xi than ni can lie in Z(G), which implies that the order of xi Z(G) is
Qt
ni . Since Z2 (G)/ Z(G) is abelian, we have | Z2 (G)/ Z(G)| = i=1 exp([xi , G]).
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
6
Let Φ(X) denote the Frattini subgroup of a group X. The following result provides some
structural information of p-groups of class 2 admitting Property A.
Proposition 3.6. Let H be a finite p-group of class 2 having Property A and Z(H) = γ2 (H).
Then
(i) γ2 (H) is cyclic;
(ii) H/ Z(H) is homocyclic;
(iii) [x, H] = γ2 (H) for all x ∈ H − Φ(H);
(iv) H is minimally generated by even number of elements.
Proof. Let H be the group given in the statement, which is minimally generated by d elements
x1 , x2 . . . , xd (say). Since Z(H) = γ2 (H), it follows that H/ Z(H) is minimally generated by
x1 Z(H), x2 Z(H), . . . , xd Z(H). Thus by the identity |H/ Z(H)| = |γ2 (H)|d , it follows that
order of xi Z(H) is equal to |γ2 (H)| for all 1 ≤ i ≤ d. Since the exponent of H/ Z(H) is equal
to the exponent of γ2 (H), we have that γ2 (H) is cyclic and H/ Z(H) is homocyclic. Now by
Qt
Lemma 3.5, |γ2 (H)|d = |H/ Z(H)| = i=1 exp([xi , H]). Since [xi , H] ⊆ γ2 (H), this implies that
[xi , H] = γ2 (H) for each i such that 1 ≤ i ≤ d. Let x be an arbitrary element in H − Φ(H).
Then the set {x} can always be extended to a minimal generating set of H. Thus it follows that
[x, H] = γ2 (H) for all x ∈ H − Φ(H). This proves first three assertions.
For the proof of (iv), we consider the group H̄ = H/Φ(γ2 (H)). Notice that both H as well
as H̄ are minimallay generated by d elements. Since [x, H] = γ2 (H) for all x ∈ H − Φ(H), it
follows that for no x ∈ H − Φ(H), x̄ ∈ Z(H̄), where x̄ = xΦ(γ2 (H)) ∈ H̄. Thus it follows that
Z(H̄) ≤ Φ(H̄). Also, since γ2 (H) is cyclic, γ2 (H̄) is cyclic of order p. Thus it follows that H̄ is
isoclinic to a finite extraspecial p-group, and therefore it is minimally generated by even number
of elements. Hence H is also minimally generated by even number of elements. This completes
the proof of the proposition.
Using the definition of isoclinism, we have
Corollary 3.7. Let G be a finite p-group of class 2 admitting Property A. Then γ2 (G) is cyclic
and G/ Z(G) is homocyclic.
We need the following important result.
Theorem 3.8 ([3], Theorem 2.1). Let G be a finite p-group of nilpotency class 2 with cyclic
center. Then G is a central product either of two generator subgroups with cyclic center or two
generator subgroups with cyclic center and a cyclic subgroup.
Theorem 3.9. Let G be a finite p-group of class 2 having Property A. Then G is isoclinic to
the group Y , defined in (3.4), for suitable positive integers m and n.
Proof. Let G be a group as in the statement. Then by Proposition 3.1 there exists a finite p-group
H isoclinic to G such that Z(H) = γ2 (H). Obviously H also satisfies |H/ Z(H)| = |γ2 (H)|d ,
where d denotes the number of elements in any minimal generating set of G/ Z(G). Then by
Proposition 3.6, γ2 (H) = Z(H) is cyclic of order q = pn (say) for some positive integer n, and
H/ Z(H) is homocyclic of exponent q and is of order q 2m for some positive integer m. Since
Z(H) = γ2 (H) is cyclic, it follows from Theorem 3.8 that H is a central product of 2-generated
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
7
groups H1 , H2 , . . . , Hm . It is easy to see that γ2 (Hi ) = Z(Hi ) for 1 ≤ i ≤ m and |γ2 (H)| = q.
This completes the proof of the theorem.
We would like to remark that Theorem 3.9 is also obtained in [26, Theorem 11.2] as a
consequence on study of class-preserving automorphisms of finite p-group. But we have presented
here a direct proof.
Now we classify finite p-groups of nilpoency class larger than 2. Consider the metacylic groups
E
D
r+t
r
r+s
t
(3.10)
K := x, y | xp
= 1, y p = xp , [x, y] = xp ,
where 1 ≤ t < r and 0 ≤ s ≤ t (t ≥ 2 if p = 2) are non-negative integers. Notice that the
nilpotency class of K is at least 3. Since K is generated by 2 elements, it follows from (2.3)
that | Autc (K)| ≤ |γ2 (K)|2 = p2r . It is not so difficult to see that | Inn(K)| = |K/ Z(K)| = p2r .
Since Inn(K) ≤ Autc (K), it follows that | Autc (K)| = | Inn(K)| = |γ2 (K)|2 = |γ2 (K)|d(K) (That
Autc (G) = Inn(G), is, in fact, true for all finite metacylic p-groups). Thus K admits Property
A. Furthermore, if H is any 2-generator group isoclinic to K, then it follows that H admits
Property A. For a finite p-groups having Property A, there always exists a p-group H isoclinic
G such that |H/ Z(H)| = |γ2 (H)|d , where d = d(H). The following theorem now classifies, upto
isoclinism, all finite p-groups G of nilpotency class larger than 2 having Property A.
Theorem 3.11 (Theorem 11.3, [26]). Let G be a finite p-group of nilpotency class at least 3.
Then the following hold true.
(i) If |G/ Z(G)| = |γ2 (G)|d , where d = d(G), then d(G) = 2;
(ii) If |γ2 (G)/γ3 (G)| > 2, then |G/ Z(G)| = |γ2 (G)|d if and only if G is a 2-generator group
with cyclic commutator subgroup. Furthermore, G is isoclinic to the group K defined in (3.10)
for suitable parameters;
(iii) If |γ2 (G)/γ3 (G)| = 2, then |G/ Z(G)| = |γ2 (G)|d if and only if G is a 2-generator 2-group
of nilpotency class 3 with elementary abelian γ2 (G) of order 4.
It is clear that the groups G occuring in Theorem 3.11(iii) are isoclinic to certain groups
of order 32. Using Magma (or GAP), one can easily show that such groups of order 32 are
SmallGroup(32,k) for k = 6, 7, 8 in the small group library.
We conclude this section with providing some different type of bounds on the central quotient
of a given group. If |γ2 (G) Z(G)/ Z(G)| = n is finite for a group G, then it follows from [22,
Theorem 1] that |G/ Z2 (G)| ≤ n2 log2 n . Using this and Lemma 3.5 we can also provide an
upper bound on the size of G/ Z(G) in terms of n, the rank of Z2 (G)/ Z(G) and exponents of
certain sets of commutators (here these sets are really subgroups of G) of coset representatives
of generators of Z2 (G)/ Z(G) with the elements of G. This is given in the following theorem.
Theorem 3.12. Let G be an arbitrary group. Let |γ2 (G) Z(G)/ Z(G)| = n is finite and Z2 (G)/ Z(G)
is finitely generated by x1 Z(G), x2 Z(G), . . . , xt Z(G) such that exp([xi , G]) is finite for 1 ≤ i ≤ t.
Then
Yt
exp([xi , G]).
|G/ Z(G)| ≤ n2 log2 n
i=1
4. Problems and Examples
Theorem B provides some conditions on a group G under which G/ Z(G) becomes finite. It
is interesting to solve
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
8
Problem 1. Let G be an arbitrary group. Provide a set C of optimal conditions on G such
that G/ Z(G) is finite if and only if all conditions in C hold true.
As we know that there is no finite non-nilpotent group G admitting Property A. Since
Inn(G) ≤ Autc (G), it is interesting to consider
Problem 2. Classify all non-nilpotent finite group G such that | Autc (G)| = |γ2 (G)|d , where
d = d(G).
A much stronger result than Theorem 3.3 is known in the case when the Frattini subgroup
of G is trivial. This is given in the following theorem of Herzog, Kaplan and Lev [10, Theorem
A] (the same result is also proved independently by Halasi and Podoski in [11, Theorem 1.1]).
Theorem 4.1. Let G be any non-abelian group with trivial Frattini subgroup. Then |G/ Z(G)| <
|γ2 (G)|2 .
The following result with the assertion similar to the preceding theorem is due to Isaacs [13].
Theorem 4.2. If G is a capable finite group with cyclic γ2 (G) and all elements of order 4 in
γ2 (G) are central in G, then |G : Z(G)| ≤ |γ2 (G)|2 . Moreover, equality holds if G is nilpotent.
So, there do exist nilpotent groups with comparatively small central quotient. A natural
problem is the following.
Problem 3. Classify all finite p-groups G such that |G : Z(G)| ≤ |γ2 (G)|2 .
Let G be a finite nilpotent group of class 2 minimally generated by d elements. Then it
Qd
follows from Lemma 3.5 that |G/ Z(G)| ≤ i=1 exp([xi , G]), which in turn implies
(4.3)
|G/ Z(G)| ≤ |exp(γ2 (G))|d .
Problem 4. Classify all finite p-groups G of nilpotency class 2 for which equality holds in (4.3).
Now we discuss some examples of infinite groups with finite central quotient. The most
obvious example is the infinite cyclic group. Other obvious examples are the groups G = H × Z,
where H is any finite group and Z is the infinite cyclic group. Non-obvious examples include
finitely generated F C-groups, in which conjugacy class sizes are bounded, and certain Cernikov
groups. We provide explicit examples in each case. Let Fn be the free group on n symbols and
p be a prime integer. Then the factor group Fn /(γ2 (Fn )p γ3 (Fn )) is the required group of the
first type, where γ2 (Fn )p = hup | u ∈ γ2 (Fn )i. Now let H = Z(p∞ ) × A be the direct product of
quasi-cyclic (Prüfer) group Z(p∞ ) and the cyclic group A = hai of order p, where p is a prime
integer. Now consider the group G = H ⋊ B, the semidirect product of H and the cyclic group
B = hbi of order p with the action by xb = x for all x ∈ Z(p∞ ) and ab = ac, where c is the
unique element of order p in Z(p∞ ). This group is suggested by V. Romankov and Rahul D.
Kitture through ResearchGate, and is a Cernikov group.
The following problem was suggested by R. Baer in [1].
Problem 5. Let A be an abelian group and Q be a group. Obtain necessary and sufficient
conditions on A and G so that there exists a group Q with A ∼
= Z(G) and Q ∼
= G/A.
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
9
This problem was solved by Baer himself for an arbitrary abelian group A and finitely generated abelian group G. Moskalenko [16] solved this problem for an arbitrary abelian group A
and a periodic abelian group G. He [17] also solved this problem for arbitrary abelian group A
and a non-periodic abelian group G such that the rank of G/t(G) is 1, where t(G) denotes the
tortion subgroup of G. If this rank is more than 1, then he solved the problem when A is a
torsion abelian group. For a given group Q, the existence of a group G such that Q ∼
= G/ Z(G)
has been studied extensively under the theme ‘Capable groups’. However, to the best of our
knowledge, Problem 5 has been poorly studied in full generality. Let us restate a special case of
this problem in a little different setup. A pair of groups (A, Q), where A is an arbitray abelian
group and Q is an arbitrary group, is said to be a capable pair if there exists a group G such
that A ∼
= Z(G) and Q ∼
= G/ Z(G). So, in our situation, the following problem is very interesting.
Problem 6. Classify capable pairs (A, Q), where A is an infinite abelian group and Q is a finite
group.
Finally let us get back to the situation when G is a group with finite γ2 (G) but infinite
G/ Z(G). The well known examples of such type are infinite extraspecial p-groups. Other class
of examples can be obtained by taking a central product (amalgamated at their centers) of
infinitely many copies of a 2-generated finite p-group of class 2 such that γ2 (H) = Z(H) is cyclic
of order q, where q is some power of p. Notice that both of these classes consist of groups of
nilpotency class 2. Now if we take G = X × H, where X is an arbitrary group with finite γ2 (X)
and H is with finite γ2 (H) and infinite H/ Z(H), then γ2 (G) is finite but G/ Z(G) is infinite. So
we can construct nilpotent groups of arbitrary class and even non-nilpotent group with infinite
central quotient and finite commutator subgroup.
A non-nilpotent group G is said to be purely non-nilpotent if it does not have any non-trivial
nilpotent subgroup as a direct factor. With the help of Rahul D. Kitture, we have also been
able to construct purely non-nilpotent groups G such that γ2 (G) is finite but G/ Z(G) is infinite.
Let H be an infinite extra-special p-group. Then we can always find a field Fq , where q is
some power of a prime, containing all pth roots of unity. Now let K be the special linear group
sl(p, Fq ), which is a non-nilpotent group having a central subgroup of order p. Now consider
the group G which is a central product of H and K amalgamated at Z(H). Then G is a purely
non-nilpotent group with the required conditions. It will be interesting to see more examples of
this type which do not occur as a central product of such infinite groups of nilpotency class 2
with non-nilpotent groups.
By Proposition 2.2 we know that for an arbitrary group G with finite γ2 (G) but infinite
G/ Z(G), the group G/ Z(G) has an infinite abelian group as a direct factor. Further structural
information is highly welcome.
Problem 7. Provide structural information of the group G such that γ2 (G) is finite but G/ Z(G)
is infinite?
References
[1] R. Baer, Groups with preassigned central and central quotient group, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 44 (1938),
387-412.
[2] W. Bosma, J. Cannon and C. Playoust, The Magma algebra system. I. The user language, J. Symbolic
Comput., 24 (1997), 235-265.
CENTRAL QUOTIENT VERSUS COMMUTATOR SUBGROUP OF GROUPS
10
[3] J. M. Brady, R. A. Bryce, and J. Cossey, On certain abelian-by-nilpotent varieties, Bull. Austral. Math.
Soc. 1 (1969), 403 - 416.
[4] Y. Cheng, On finite p-groups with cyclic commutator subgroup, Arch. Math. 39 (1982), 295-298.
[5] S. Dolfi, E. Pacifici and M. K. Yadav, Bounds for the index of the centre in non-nilpotent groups, preprint.
[6] L. Fuchs, Infinite abelian groups, Vol. I Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol 36 Academic Press, Yew York
- London, 1970.
[7] D. K. Gumber and H. Kalra, On the converse of a theorem of Schur, Arch. Math. (Basel) 101 (2013), 17-20.
[8] P. Hall, The classification of prime power groups, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 182
(1940), 130-141.
[9] P. Hall, Finite-by-nilpotent groups, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 52 (1956), 611-616.
[10] M. Herzog, G. Kaplan and A. Lev, The size of the commutator subgroup of finite groups, J. Algebra 320
(2008), 980-986.
[11] Z. Halasi and K. Podoski, Bounds in groups with trivial Frattini subgroups, J. Algebra 319 (2008), 893-896.
[12] P. Hilton, On a theorem of Schur, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 28 (2001), 455-460.
[13] I. M. Isaacs, Derived subgroups and centers of capable groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (2001), 2853-2859.
[14] I. D. Macdonald, Some explicit bounds in groups with finite derived groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)
11 (1961), 23-56.
[15] A. Magidin and R. F. Morse, Certain homological functors of 2-generator p-groups of class 2, Contemp.
Math. 511 (2010), 127-166.
[16] A. I. Moskalenko, Central extensions of abelian groups by means of abelian groups, Sibirsk. Mat. Z. 9 (1968),
104-115.
[17] A. I. Moskalenko, Central extensions of a periodic abelian group by means of an abelian group. Algebra and
number theory. Moskov. Gos. Ped. Inst. Ucen. Zap. 375 (1971), 80-84.
[18] B. H. Neumann, Groups with finite classes of conjugate elements, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 1 (1951),
178-187.
[19] B. H. Neumann, Groups covered by permutable subsets, J. London Math. Soc. 29 (1954), 236-248.
[20] B. H. Neumann, A problem of Paul Erdös on groups, J. Austral. Math. Soc. 21 (Series A) (1976), 467-472.
[21] P. Niroomand, The converse of Schur’s theorem, Arch. Math. 94 (2010), 401-403.
[22] K. Podoski and B. Szegedy, Bounds for the index of the centre in capable groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.
133 (2005), 3441-3445.
[23] I. Schur, Über die Darstellung der endlichen Gruppen durch gebrochene lineare Substitutionen, Journal für
die reine und angewandte Mathematik 127 (1904), 20-50.
[24] B. Sury, A generalization of a converse of Schur’s theorem, Arch. Math. 95 (2010), 317-318.
[25] M. K. Yadav, Class-preserving automorphisms of finite p-groups: a survey, Groups St Andrews - 2009
(Bath), LMS Lecture Note Ser. 388 (2011), 569-579.
[26] M. K. Yadav, Class-preserving automorphisms of finite p-groups II, Israel J. Math. 209 (2015), 355-396.
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-015-1222-4
School of Mathematics, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad
- 211 019, INDIA
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1709.00410v2 [cs.NE] 10 Jan 2018
Visual art inspired by the collective feeding behavior of
sand–bubbler crabs
Hendrik Richter
HTWK Leipzig University of Applied Sciences
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology
Postfach 301166, D–04251 Leipzig, Germany.
Email: [email protected].
January 11, 2018
Abstract
Sand–bubblers are crabs of the genera Dotilla and Scopimera which are known to produce remarkable
patterns and structures at tropical beaches. From these pattern–making abilities, we may draw inspiration
for digital visual art. A simple mathematical model is proposed and an algorithm is designed that may
create such sand–bubbler patterns artificially. In addition, design parameters to modify the patterns are
identified and analyzed by computational aesthetic measures. Finally, an extension of the algorithm is
discussed that may enable controlling and guiding generative evolution of the art–making process.
1
Introduction
Among the various forms of inspiration from biology for digital visual art, swarms and other types of
collective animal behavior are considered to be particularly promising of showing algorithmic ideas and
templates that may have the potential to create non–trivial patterns of aesthetic value. Examples are ant–
and ant–colony–inspired visual art [12, 25], but our imagination has also been stimulated by the pattern–
making of flies [1] and other swarms, flocks, or colonies [15, 22].
In this paper, the collective behavior of another family of animals provides a source of inspiration: crabs
of the genera Dotilla and Scopimera, commonly called sand–bubblers. Sand–bubbler crabs are known for
their burrow–orientated feeding behavior that produces radial patterns of regular shapes and designs in
the wet sand of tropical beaches [2, 3, 7]. The patterns consist of tiny balls that are placed in curves or
spirals, straight or bent lines, which finally form overall structures, thus producing astonishing works of
natural art [4]. The creation of structures starts at receding tide. The patterns grow in complexity and
scale as time goes by until the returning tide cleans them off, in fact resetting the art–making process. This
pattern–making behavior, its visual results, and the potentials of thus inspired algorithms producing digital
visual art are our topics.
We approach these topics by discussing three interconnected main themes in this paper. The first is to
describe an aspect of animal behavior observed in nature (the feeding pattern of a colony of sand–bubbler
crabs) by economic mathematical means in order to make it accessible for an algorithmic process producing
two–dimensional visual art. This goes along with identifying design parameters that allow the patterns to
vary within the restriction that they should generally resemble structures as found in nature. The second
theme is to study the image–producing process by computational aesthetic measures. Here, the focus is
not on numerically evaluating an overall artistic value. There are some strong arguments that such an
evaluation is rather elusive and may not really be achievable free from ambiguity, see also the discussion
in Sec. 3. Instead, the focus is put on how some aesthetic measures, namely Benford’s law measure, Ross,
1
Figure 1: Feeding patterns of sand–bubbler crabs, observed by the author at Tanjung Beach, Langkawi,
Malaysia, in March 2017.
Ralph and Zong’s bell–curve measure and a fractal dimension measure, scale to the design parameters. A
third theme is to use these measures to guide and control the art–making process. This is done by updating
the design parameters while the algorithmic process is running. By employing the relationships between
aesthetic measures and design parameters for updating the parameters, the measures can be changed in an
intended way. Hence, this theme studies the possibilities of including generative development, which takes
up some ideas from evolving and evolutionary art.
The paper is structured as follows. Sec. 2 reviews the behavior of sand–bubbler crabs, particularly the
burrow–orientated feeding process. Inspired by these behavioral patterns, Sec. 3 presents an algorithm to
create visual art, studies computational aesthetic measures and generative development, and finally shows
examples of art pieces thus created. Concluding remarks and an outlook end the paper.
2
Behavior of sand–bubbler crabs
Sand–bubbler crabs are tiny crustacean decapods of the genera Dotilla and Scopimera in the family Dotillidae
that dwell on tropical sandy beaches across the Indo–Pacific region. They permanently inhabit intertidal
environments as they adapted to the interplay between high and low tide. Sand–bubblers are surface deposit
feeders. Thus, their habitat must be periodically covered by water for their food supply to restore. They
are also air–breathers. Thus, the habital zone needs to be periodically uncovered from water for giving
them time for feeding. Observing these periodic changes, the crabs dig burrows in the sand where they seek
shelter and hide during high tide. In low tide (and daylight) they swarm out in search for food. They pick
up sand grains with their pincers and eat the microscopic organic particles that are left over by the receding
tide and coat the grains. After they have cleaned the sand grains of eatable components, they form them
into small balls, also called pseudo–faecal pellets, and throw them behind. Supposedly, they do so in order
to avoid searching the same sand twice. As high tide comes back in, they retreat to their burrows, seal them
to trap air, and wait for the next tidal cycle.
By this process of feeding, and particularly by molding sand into pellets and distributing them, sand–
bubbler crabs create intricate patterns in the sand that remain there until the next high tide washes them
away, see Fig. 1 that shows such feeding patterns as observed by the author at Tanjung Beach, Langkawi,
Malaysia in March 2017. The patterns in the sand start from a center point, have a radial orientation
and comprise of small sand balls along a tiny path. The patterns vary in complexity depending on how
many crabs there are contributing, on how long the last high tide is away, and on several other factors
discussed below. The patterns in the sand are starting point and inspiration for an algorithm producing
two–dimensional visual art. Before presenting such an algorithm in Sec. 3, it may be interesting to explore
the feeding process and the pattern–making a bit more deeply.
A main feature of the lifestyle of sand–bubblers is their burrow–orientated feeding behavior [2, 3, 5, 7].
2
This means that the entrance of the burrow is the center of the feeding range and the feeding process is
highly structured. Basically, such a structured and stereotype behavior can be found generally among the
14 species of Dotilla and 17 species of Scopimera currently recognized, but there is variety in the details
of the feeding. This, in turn, offers to vary the art–making algorithm in order to achieve different graphic
effects.
The feeding starts from the burrow entrance, where the crab sets out to progress sideways along a
straight line radiating from the burrow. While moving along, it sorts sand from organic–rich fine particles
which are scraped off and subsequently ingested. The crab only feeds on the upper millimeter or two of
the sand. The residual larger nutrient–deficient sand grains are molded into ball–like globules, but not
digested, which motivates calling them pseudo–faecal pellets. When a pellet has reached a certain diameter,
which scales to the size of the crab, it is moved along the body and pushed away behind the animal. After
moving along the straight line radiating from the burrow and ejecting pellets for a certain distance, the
crab steps aside, turns around and moves back toward the burrow entrance while continuing with feeding
and pellet ejecting. When reaching the entrance, its turns around again, and works the next line (see also
Fig. 2 for a schematic description). The pellets are placed in such a way that a straight path to the burrow
entrance always remains clear. This is essential for the crab to retreat to the burrow in case of external
disturbance or danger. Consequently, the feeding progresses radially line by line while the lines (which
are also called trenches in the biological literature) rotate around the burrow entrance just like the hands
of a clock. In fieldwork it has been observed that the rotation may be clockwise or anti–clockwise with
approximately the same frequency [17, 20]. By such a rotation of the feeding trench, an angular sector of
a circle in the sand is excavated, cleared of eatable components, and amassed with pellets. The angular
sector of uninterrupted feeding may vary; an average of 60◦ has been reported, but also that occasionally
a full circle has been completed [2, 13, 17], see also the right–hand side of Fig. 1. Furthermore, it has
been reported that there is a fairly close relationship between the maximum length of a trench and the size
of the crab. Such a relationship is plausible as the maximum length together with the crab size scales to
the maximum time needed for the crab to seek shelter in the burrow, if an external disturbance requires
such an escape. For one species of sand–bubblers, Dotilla wichmanni, even a measurement of the maximum
length has been recorded with the body length of eight to nine crabs [17]. Furthermore, another stereotype
of pattern has been identified as sometimes the distribution of pellets along the trench follows a rhythmic
pattern where the crab regularly suspends pellet ejecting and “concentric rings” emerge, as shown for Dotilla
clepsydrodactylus [20].
In view of the structured burrow–orientated feeding behavior of sand–bubbler crabs as described above,
it seems not surprising that regular patterns in the sand emerge. Ideally, a well–ordered collection of full
circular areas with the burrow entrance in the center should appear that are filled with radial strings of
equally distanced pellets. However, looking at patterns from nature (see, for instance, Fig. 1) reveals them
as irregular in several respects. There are reasons for these irregularities. A first reason is that for a colony
of sand–bubblers the coordinates of the burrow entrances are randomly distributed across the beach where
they are dwelling. There is almost always a certain minimum distance between two burrow entrances and
the number of burrows for a given square of beach follows a Poisson distribution, as shown for the species
Dotilla fenestrata [11]. A second reason is that the orientation of the first trench (and hence the overall
orientation of the angular sector) is not different from a random distribution [17, 20]. There is no indication
that the orientation is related to the slope of the sand surface, or any compass direction or the sun’s position.
Another reason, for instance reported for the species Scopimera inflata [7], is that a crab may move a short
distance away from the entrance of the burrow before starting to feed, which results in a gap between
burrow and trench. The width of the gap appears to be randomly distributed around the crab’s size. A
further reason is that for a given burrow (and therefore a crab of given size) the trenches have not all the
same length, even if the feeding is undisturbed [11]. There is a weak correlation between trench length and
feeding time, with the trenches growing longer the longer the crab feeds, but generally also trench length
must be regarded as to follow a random distribution. Finally, a crab may be externally disturbed at any
time, for instance by intruders such as other crabs or human observers, or eating enemies such as shorebirds.
3
y
j=36
s
Cs
j = 4
j=2
Cs
J
B
J C
B
J^
BMB j = 1
J
J Cs
s
rk
J Cs
M
J Cs
Pi
j =5P
θ1
PP
D P
JC
u
x
D
T
(xi , yi )
>
j = 6 DD
Figure 2: Algorithmically generating a pellet location with the burrow coordinates (xi , yi )T , the trench
angle θ1 of the (lower branch of the) first trench and the radial coordinate rk ; see also the first term of the
right–hand side of Eq. (1). The arrows indicate the feeding direction of a sand–bubbler crab. The outbound
trench j = 3 depicts a radial string of six equally distanced pellets, while for j = 1 there is one pellet; for
the other trenches the pellets are not shown.
As sand–bubblers are extremely perceptive to movement, in such a case the crab rapidly escapes to the
burrow. It may reemerge a little later and resume eating. The feeding may or may not continue along the
trench last used before escape. It has been convincingly argued by field experiments that sand–bubblers
(for instance the species Dotilla wichmanni) must possess remarkable orientation abilities that allow them
to resume the direction along which they were feeding, even in the absence of visual clues such as a partly
finished trench [17]. Whether or not a crab uses these abilities in a given situation, however, also appears
to follow a random distribution. Lastly, a crab may interrupt its feeding even if there is no evident external
trigger, for instance to rest or to restore its water supply, which is done in the burrow.
To sum it up: The exact position of each pellet follows from the structure of the burrow–oriented feeding
behavior, but is subject to a substantial degree of random. If we reframe the organized and sequential
placement of a sufficiently large number of pellets as a dynamic process, the pattern generation could
be interpreted as a random walk substantially biased by the feeding structure. This interplay between
determinism and random may be one of the reasons why the patterns in the sand appear non–trivial and of
some aesthetic value. Finally, we may note that apart from feeding, there are at least two further aspects
of the sand–bubbler’s lifestyle that might be interesting as inspiration for visual art, burrow–digging and
interaction with other crabs. These aspects could be addressed in future work.
3
3.1
Design of art–making algorithms
Generating patterns from pellet distribution
The feeding behavior of sand–bubbler crabs as described in Sec. 2 is now used to design templates for
algorithmically generating two–dimensional visual art. With respect to the regular and irregular aspects of
the sand patterns, the art–making algorithm is also comprised of deterministic and random elements.
Describing the algorithm starts with the notion that every pellet has a location (xijk , yijk )T in a two–
dimensional plane. The index (ijk) refers to the k–th pellet (k = 1, 2, 3, . . . , Kij ) belonging to the j–th
trench (j = 1, 2, 3, . . . , Ji ) of the i–th burrow (i = 1, 2, 3, . . . , I). The pellet location is algorithmically
specified by
2 )
N (µijk , σijk
xijk
xi + rk · cos (θj )
=
+
,
(1)
2 )
yijk
yi + rk · sin (θj )
N (µijk , σijk
where (xi , yi )T are the coordinates of the i–th burrow, θj is the trench angle belonging to the j–th trench,
and rk is the radial coordinate of the k–th pellet. For each burrow, the maximum number of pellets Kij
remains to be specified for a given i and j; the same applies to the maximum number of trenches Ji . Fig. 2
unpacks the description and shows an example with one burrow and six trenches (three outbound and three
returning).
4
Algorithm 1 Generate patterns from pellet distribution
Set maximum number of burrows I
for i=1 to I do
Generate burrow coordinates (xi , yi )T
Set maximum number of trenches Ji
for j=1 to Ji do
Generate trench angle θj
Set maximum number of pellets Kij
for k=1 to Kij do
Generate pellet radial coordinate rk
2
Set mean µijk and variance σijk
Calculate pellet location (xijk , yijk )T by Eq. (1)
Return location and store for subsequent coloring and visualization
end for
end for
end for
The first term of the right–hand side of Eq. (1) can be seen as to represent the deterministic aspect
of the pellet ejecting that characterizes the burrow–orientated feeding behavior of sand–bubblers. The
second term represents the random aspect with shifting the position by a realization of a random variable
2 . Accordingly, every pellet location (x , y )T has
normally distributed with mean µijk and variance σijk
ijk ijk
three deterministic parameters: burrow coordinates (xi , yi )T , trench angle θj and radial coordinate rk ;
2
of the normal distribution from which the
and two stochastic parameters: mean µijk and variance σijk
random shift in position is realized. Eq. (1) not only specifies the location of a pellet, it can also be
used to generate patterns consisting of pellets, trenches and burrows, see Algorithm 1. Therefore, for each
burrow coordinates (xi , yi )T , one sequence of trench angles (θ1 , θ2 , . . . , θJi ) and Ji sequences of pellet radial
coordinates (r1 , r2 , . . . , rKij ) are defined. A major guideline for defining these parameter sequences is the
intention to replicate characteristic features of the sand–bubbler pattern as discussed in Sec. 2. These
patterns can be labeled according to the graphic effects they convey and subsequently taken as templates
to create two–dimensional visual art works. In the numerical experiments reported in Sec. 3.4 the following
templates are used: (i) random trench length (RTL), (ii) growing trench length (GTL), (iii) concentric
rings (CCR), and (iv) burrow–to–trench gaps (BTG). Each template varies the art–making algorithm and
replicates a specific pattern found in nature. For random trench length (RTL), the maximal number of
trenches Ji is a random integer uniformly distributed on [1, Jmax ]. The first and the last trench angle (θ1
and θJi ) are chosen as realizations of a uniform random variable distributed on [0, 2π]; the remaining trench
angles are calculated from the number Ji to be equidistant between θ1 and θJi . Each trench has a length `j
that is a realization of a random variable normally distributed on [µT , σT2 ]. From the length `j , the pellet
radial coordinates are calculated to be equidistant with distance dj . Growing trench length (GTL) is similar
to RTL (and uses the same general design parameters), but the trench length `j is calculated by a normal
distribution where the mean µT grows with trench j by a growth rate ∆µT . Thus, the first trench has
mean µT , while the Ji –th trench has mean µT + (Ji − 1)∆µT . The variance σT2 is constant. Concentric
rings (CCR) again have trenches with constant mean and variance but do not always have equidistant pellet
radial coordinates as there are λ gaps of width gλ where no pellets are placed. Finally, burrow–to–trench
gaps (BTG) start with a gap of width g0 in pellet placement. Tab. 1 summarizes the design parameters.
Algorithm 1 specifies the location of the pellets and hence the structure of the patterns. In nature, the
patterns are monochromatic as the pellets all have the color of the sand they are built from, see Fig. 1.
The artistic interpretation of the patterns suggests using different colors for making them more visually
appealing and also conveying additional information. As the algorithm imposes a chronological order on
pellet placement by a forward counting of burrows, trenches and finally the pellets themselves, a possible
5
Table 1: Design parameters and default values for generating patterns from pellet distribution, see Algorithm
1. The parameters of RTL are general and also apply to the other templates.
Template Design parameter
Symbol Default value
RTL
Number of burrows
I
3
T
(and
Burrow coordinates
(xi , yi )
N (0, 7)
general)
Maximum number of trenches Jmax
50
Pellet distance
dj
0.25
Mean random shifting
µijk
−1, 0, 1
2
Variance random shifting
σijk
0.3, 0.8
Mean trench length
µT
25
Variance trench length
σT2
1
GTL
Grow rate
∆µT
2
CCR
Number of gaps
λ
3
Gap width
gλ
4
BTG
Burrow gap width
g0
8
design is to use a colorization that reflects this order. Alternatively, each burrow can be associated with
a specific color and the order of the pellet placement can be characterized by shades or brightness of this
color. In addition, the burrows using the same template (see Tab. 1) may take colors that are similar.
3.2
Analysis by computational aesthetic measures
Next, the templates and their design parameters are analyzed by computational aesthetic measures. This
analysis aims at studying two questions. (i) To what extend do the measures vary over the templates and
parameters? This goes along with assessing how sensitive these relationships are. (ii) Which templates
and/or parameters are most suitable to guide and control the art–making process toward desired values of
the aesthetic measures?
Three computational aesthetic measures are studied, Benford’s law measure (BFL), Ross, Ralph and
Zong’s bell curve measure (RRZ) and a fractal dimension measure (FRD), which were chosen because a
recent study reported them to be weakly correlated [6]. All measures are calculated for the images with
512 × 512 pixels. The Benford’s law measure BFL [6, 21] is known for scaling to the naturalness of an image.
It is calculated by taking the distribution of the luminosity of an image and comparing it to the Benford’s
law distribution:
BFL = 1 − dtotal /dmax
(2)
P9
where dtotal = i=1 (HI (i) − HB (i)), dmax = 1.398 is the maximum possible value of dtotal , HB = (0.301, 0.176, 0.125,
is the Benford’s law distribution and HI is the normalized sorted 9–bin histogram of the luminosity of the
image. The luminosity of the image is calculated for each pixel of the image by taking the weighted sum of
the red (R), green (G) and blue (B) values: lum = 0.2126 · R + 0.7152 · G + 0.0722 · B.
Ross, Ralph and Zong’s bell–curve measure RRZ [6, 23] is a measure of color gradient normality. It
compares the color gradients of the image to a normal (bell-curve or Gaussian) distribution. Therefore, the
color gradient of the colors red, green and blue are calculated for each pixel, summarized and normalized by
a detection threshold, see [6, 23] for details. Hence, we obtain a distribution with mean µ and variance σ 2 .
The distribution is discretized into 100 bins to obtain a discrete color gradient distribution pi . For µ and
σ 2 calculated from the observed color gradient distribution, an expected discrete Gaussian distribution qi
is computed. Finally, the Kullback–Leibler divergence between these two distributions gives the bell–curve
measures
X
RRZ =
pi log (pi /qi ).
(3)
i
6
Figure 3: Aesthetic measures as a function of design parameters: number of burrows I, maximum number
of trenches Jmax and pellet distance dj . RTL (blue), GTL (magenta), CCR (red), BTG (green); solid lines,
2 = 0.3, dotted lines, σ 2 = 0.8.
σijk
ijk
Note that in deviation from [6, 23], the Kullback–Leibler divergence in Eq. (3) is not amplified by the factor
1000.
The third aesthetic measure studied is the fractal dimension FRD [6, 24] of the image. Following empirical
studies and an argument by Spehar et al. [24], a fractal image of dimension 1.3 ≤ d ≤ 1.5 is most preferred
by human evaluation, compared to images that have a fractal dimension outside this range. Thus, a fractal
dimension d ≈ 1.35 is considered to be most desirable and the fractal aesthetic measure
FRD = max (0, 1 − |1.35 − d|)
(4)
can be defined, where d is the fractal dimension of the image calculated by box–counting.
Fig. 3 shows the measures for the templates RTL, GTL, CCR and BTG for selected design parameters
2 . The results are means over 100 images generated
and two values of the variance of the random shifting σijk
by Algorithm 1 and the design parameters listed in Tab. 1. The design parameter number of burrows I
is varied over 2 ≤ I ≤ 10, the maximum number of trenches Jmax over 20 ≤ Jmax ≤ 100 and the pellet
distance dj over 0.05 ≤ dj ≤ 1. The default values of these parameters all lie within the range studied.
7
Furthermore, as the aesthetic measures are calculated from the RGB values of the pixels, the colors of the
image have a profound effect on the values of the measures. As discussed in Sec. 3.1, the colorization of the
pellets is also a subject of algorithmic design. Thus, to counter the effect of a given colorization and for not
singularizing particular colors, the results are calculated as means over 70 hue values randomly selected.
From the results in Fig. 3, we see that the different templates (RTL, GTL, CCR, BTG) generally produce
characteristic curves over the design parameters for the aesthetic measures BFL and RRZ. Also, the two
values of random shifting (which can be interpreted as noise levels) are clearly distinct. The general trend
is that BFL and RRZ decrease with increasing number of burrows I and increasing maximum number of
trenches Jmax , while there is an increase with increasing pellet distance dj . An interesting exception is the
template CCR which for varying pellet distance dj behaves differently and crosses the curves of the other
templates. The results for the aesthetic measures FRD are slightly different. For FRD, the templates RTL
and BTG (blue and green lines) have almost the same results and for all templates, different noise levels
have only negligible effect. A possible explanation is that the difference between RTL and BTG is only that
in the images there is a circle free from pellets around the burrow entrance for BTG. The overall structure of
the pellet placement is the same, which is recognized by the calculation of the fractal dimension accounting
mainly for density of geometrical objects but less for their layout. The same may apply for varying the
noise level. Based on these results assessing how sensitive the relationships between design parameters and
aesthetic measures are, some conclusions can be drawn about possible ways to guide and control the art–
making algorithm. Basically, there are two options. One is to switch to a particular template but keep the
values of design parameters, another is to keep the template but change the values of design parameters.
(In fact, it would also be thinkable to change both template and parameter value at the same time, but this
may appear rather contrived.) For instance, to increase the aesthetic measure BFL, employing the template
BTG is suitable, while RRZ is largest for RTL (but not very clearly) and FRD for GTL. Another possibility
to raise BFL is to decrease the maximum number of trenches Jmax . The same is also useful to increase
RRZ, particularly for the template CCR, but not for FRD. There are more subtle schemes to manipulate
the measures, but it is also clear that the three aesthetic measures studied here react differently, yet even
contradictory to these manipulations. With this in mind, next section discusses possible designs of such
manipulations and their effects on the art–making process.
3.3
Guiding and controlling generative evolution
Main features of generative and evolving digital art are that the creating process develops over time, is
guided and controlled by the algorithmic design, and thus gains functional autonomy to produce complete
art works [10]. A frequently used design for guidance and control is to implement a feedback, for instance via
evaluating the works by using a measure of their aesthetic value [18, 22]. Such ideas are, for instance, implemented by employing evolutionary algorithms for finding “optimal” values of the aesthetic measures, which
has shown to create interesting works of art [1, 6, 14, 22]. Algorithm 1 given in Sec. 3.1 does not really, in
itself, evoke such a perspective of autonomously guiding and controlling generative evolution. The algorithm
is suitable for producing visual art works. It also depends on selecting templates and design parameters
(see Tab. 1), which enables modifying the works by changing the selection. Thus, promoting generative
evolution essentially requires measuring the aesthetic value of the algorithmically generated patterns and
designing a feedback.
Of course, it is possible to evaluate the pattern by interaction with humans. However, there are some
issues with interactive evaluation [8, 9, 22]. The first is that humans evaluating art are usually much slower
in doing so than computers algorithmically generating the works, which creates the proverbial “fitness
bottleneck”. A second reason is that human evaluation may change over time, for instance caused by
fatigue, but also by boredom, which may bias the results towards superficial novelty rather than overall
quality. A third reason is that human evaluation of art is always conditioned by personal and cultural
“taste”. For this reason, it is no real help to distribute the evaluation to a larger group of human evaluators.
In such a case, either the tastes of different subgroups become visible (as for instance shown for evaluating
8
Algorithm 2 Guide and control pattern–making
Set up look–up table with template and design parameters that increase computational aesthetic measures
Calculate expected aesthetic measures for the look–up table
Select random template and take default design parameter
while Termination criterion not met do
Generate burrow by Algorithm 1
Calculate aesthetic measures
if Measure < Expectation then
Select randomly increasing template or design parameter
else
Keep template and parameter
end if
end while
the beauty of abstract paintings [19]), or generally the averaging effect of asking a large group of people
about their aesthetic choices is reproduced, but arguably “the unique kind of vision expected from artists” [8]
is not achieved.
An alternative are computational aesthetic measures [6, 8, 9, 19, 21], which enable an automated rating
without human interference or supervision. Sec. 3.2 discussed such measures for evaluating sand–bubbler
patterns. These aesthetic measures of two–dimensional visual art are frequently calculated by analyzing the
(spatial) distribution of colored pixels (or groups of pixels). In other words, computational aesthetic measures
use properties such as pixel–wise color information to deduce an overall rating of an image. However, there
is a significant conceptual gap between measuring computational image properties and aesthetic beauty.
Apart from the measures considered in Sec. 3.2, there is a huge number of measures that try to bridge
this gap, see e.g. [9, 6, 16, 19] for an overview. Some of them are strongly correlated, while others address
different aspects of the color distribution. Moreover, recent studies [6, 19] suggested that it seems rather
difficult to establish stable correlations between beauty ratings by humans and image properties, which casts
some doubts on whether an evaluation of the aesthetic value of visual art based on computational aesthetic
measures is really objective, meaningful and feasible. These studies have also shown that computational
aesthetic measures account more for certain visual effects (or “visual styles” [6]) than for aesthetic value
in general. For instance, Benford’s law measure (BFL) assigns high values for images that have a grainy
texture, while Ross, Ralph and Zong’s bell curve measure (RRZ) likes distinct color progression and the
fractal dimension measure (FRD) values low colorfulness highly; see den Heijer & Eiben [6] for a discussion
and comparison of 7 computational aesthetic measures.
In the following, we study an alternative approach for guiding and controlling generative evolution that
tries to address the desire to promote certain visual effects, see Algorithm 2. It utilizes the relationships
between design parameters and aesthetic measures discussed in Sec. 3.2. Therefore, a look–up–table is set
up that lists templates and design parameters that increase aesthetic measures. After generating the pattern
for each single burrow, an aesthetic measure is calculated and compared to an “expected value” recorded
before, see Fig. 3. If the value is below the expectation, a measure–increasing template or design parameter
is activated. If not, the generation process continues unaltered. Which template or parameter is selected
is due to chance. These steps are repeated until a termination criterion is met. In this implementation,
the pattern generation ends if a maximum number of burrows are placed in the image. (In the rare case
that no measure–increasing template or parameter is available, the setting is also kept.) An interesting
feature of such an algorithmic design is that it immediately allows to control and intervene while the image
is being created. In other words, the control does not wait until the image is completed, but uses feedback
for intervening during the process creating the art works. Fig. 4 shows the aesthetic measures BFL, RRZ
and FRD for Algorithm 2. The experimental setup is the same as for the templates, see Fig. 3. Again, the
9
Figure 4: Aesthetic measures for guiding and controlling pattern–making. The measures for the templates
(RTL, GLT, CCR, BTG) with the default values of the design parameters (see Tab. 1) are compared to
the measures obtained by Algorithm 2. GCB means using the measure BFL to guide and control, GCR uses
RRZ, GCF uses FRD.
results are averages over 100 images and 70 random hue values. The aesthetic measures for the templates
in Tab. 1 are compared to using the measures BFL (GCB ), RRZ (GCR ) and FRD (GCF ) for guiding and
controlling the art–making process. Apart from the results of the measures that are obtained by using the
same measures to guide and control, we also record the results of the other measures to examine cross–effects
(GCR and GCF for BFL, GCB and GCF for RRZ and GCB and GCR for FRD). The results in Fig. 4 indicate
that using templates and design parameters is mostly suitable to manipulate the aesthetic measures in an
intended way. For BFL we obtain that the measure for GCB is increased as compared to the templates RTL,
GTL and CCR, while the images do contain a mix of all templates. For FRD, we even find an increase in
GCF compared to all templates. However, for RRZ we get a rather strong decrease in GCR . A possible
explanation is that the measure RRZ accounts for color gradient normality, while the effect of Algorithm 2
is basically in changing the selection of templates and design parameters but only indirectly in colorization.
Hence, the measure RRZ is poorly sensitive to such a changed selection. These speculations are supported
by looking at cross–effects as we see that also the measures that are not used for guidance and control
show similar results. This additionally allows to conjecture that for images such as the feeding patterns the
aesthetic measures are more correlated than initially assumed. Next, we look at the visual results produced
by both algorithms1 .
3.4
Examples of art works
Fig. 5 shows a gallery of nine art works generated by Algorithm 1 with the parameter values given in Tab.
1. Looking at these images, we can see that they all display structures that have similarity to natural sand–
bubbler patterns. However, colorization of the actual choices of the random–dependent design parameters
also offers diversity. In addition, another six images generated by Algorithm 2 are shown in Fig. 6. Although
there is a substantial degree of similarity between these images and the images generated by Algorithm 1, it
is worth observing some subtle differences. For instance, it is noticeable that typically the images produced
by Algorithm 2 are more widespread and grainier, see for instance Fig. 6 upper left and lower middle, which
may be attributed to the effect of promoting the visual effects associated with the measure BFL. However,
at least in the opinion of the author, there was no real success in provoking a distinct color progression or a
particularly low colorfulness, as supposedly associated with RRZ and FRD. More analytic work is needed to
clarify the relationships between aesthetic measures and visual effects for a given image–producing algorithm.
1
See https://feit-msr.htwk-leipzig.de/sandbubblerart/ for further images and videos.
10
Figure 5: Gallery with examples of sand–bubbler inspired art works generated by Algorithm 1.
4
Concluding remarks and outlook
An algorithm to create visual art has been presented that draws inspiration from the collective feeding
behavior of sand–bubbler crabs. Thus, the paper exemplifies another instance of an art–making process
based on mathematical models of animal behavior observed in nature. Apart from the algorithmic design
and its artistic output, we mainly studied the algorithmic process, particularly how computational aesthetic
measures scale to the design parameters and how these measures can be used for controlling and guiding
generative evolution. The interest in analyzing the algorithmic process of digital art–making is from both
a computational and an artistic point of view. The rationale for the latter is that art–theoretically and
following an argument of Philip Galanter [8, 10], in generative art the artistic work in itself is not seen as
important as the artistic process. In a reminiscence to the art movement of “truth to material”, generative
art may focus on “truth to process”. A possible interpretation states that it is far less interesting to just
ask if a human observer likes a particular piece of artificial art. What is much more interesting is to analyze
the creation procedure of generative art and study the interplay between algorithmic design (and design
parameters) and the works thus created. Not only is the question of whether or not an artificially created
image is more or less aesthetic from a human point of view merely opening up an inexhaustible topic
11
Figure 6: Gallery with examples of sand–bubbler inspired art works generated by Algorithm 2.
of debate and might be not answerable, this question may actually not be very useful for advancing our
understanding of what constitutes artistic beauty and how it can be algorithmically (re–)created. In this
spirit the galleries of art works shown in Figs. 5 and 6 could be rather seen as accompanying the analytic
results, and not the other way around.
The analytic and visual results given here only use a small subset of the design space opened up by
Algorithm 1 and 2. Future work could further explore this design space. For instance, the images only
contain pellets of a given size and color. It would be interesting to study the visual effects of pellets
with different sizes or pellets decorated in a polychromatic way and/or with their own visual structure.
Furthermore, the patterns presented are bound by the restriction that they resemble (at least roughly)
sand–bubbler patterns as can be observed in nature. A possible extension is to soften this restriction. For
instance, in nature the scale of patterns may vary, but not dramatically. In the art works, there could be
(next to patterns of the size as seen in Figs. 5 and 6) very large structures even exceeding the edges of
the images. A possible effect would be to have a background of pellets across the entire image, which may
produce different levels of pointillism, as similarly shown by Urbano’s sand painting artists [25].
References
[1] Abbood, Z. A., Amlal, O., Vidal, F. P.: Evolutionary art using the fly algorithm. In: Squillero, G.,
Sim, K. (eds.) Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2017. pp. 455–470, Springer,
Cham (2017) .
[2] Ansell, A. D.: Migration or shelter? Behavioural options for deposit feeding crabs on tropical sandy
shores. In: Chelazzi, G., Vannini, M. (eds.) Behavioral Adaptation to Intertidal Life. pp. 15–26,
Springer, New York (1988).
[3] Bigalke, R.: On the habits of the crab Dotilla fenestrata, Hilgendorf, with special reference to the mode
of feeding. South Afr. J. Nat. Hist. 3, 205–209 (1921).
12
[4] Burton, A.: Symbols in sand. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 456 (2016).
[5] Chakrabarti, A., Chakrabarti, R., Hertweck, G.: Surface traces and bioturbate textures from bubbler
crabs: an indicator of subtropical to tropical tidal flat environments. Senckenbergiana maritima 36,
19–27 (2006).
[6] den Heijer, E., Eiben, A. E.: Investigating aesthetic measures for unsupervised evolutionary art. Swarm
Evol. Comput. 16, 52–68 (2014).
[7] Fielder, D. R.: The feeding behaviour of the sand crab Scopimera inflata (Decapoda, Ocypodidae). J.
Zool. (London) 160, 35–49 (1970).
[8] Galanter, P.: The problem with evolutionary art is... In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) Applications of
Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2010. pp. 321–330, Springer, Berlin (2010).
[9] Galanter, P.: Computational aesthetic evaluation: Past and future. In: McCormack, J., d’Inverno, M.
(eds.) Computers and Creativity. pp. 255–293, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012).
[10] Galanter, P.: Generative art theory. In: Paul, C. (ed.) A Companion to Digital Art. pp. 146–180, John
Wiley, Chichester (2016).
[11] Gherardi, F., Russo, S.: Burrowing activity in the sand–bubbler crab, Dotilla fenestrata (Crustacea,
Ocypodidae), inhabiting a mangrove swamp in Kenya. J. Zool. (London) 253, 211–223 (2001).
[12] Greenfield, G., Machado, P.: Ant– and ant–colony–inspired Alife visual art. Artificial life 21, 293–306
(2015).
[13] Hartnoll, R. G.: Factors affecting the distribution and behaviour of the crab Dotilla fenestrata on East
African shores. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 1, 137–152 (1973).
[14] House, A., Agah, A.: Autonomous evolution of digital art using genetic algorithms. J. Intell. Syst. 25,
319–333 (2016).
[15] Jacob, C. J., Hushlak, G., Boyd, J. E., Nuytten, P., Sayles, M., Pilat, M.: Swarmart: Interactive art
from swarm intelligence. Leonardo 40, 248–254 (2007).
[16] Johnson, C. G.: Fitness in evolutionary art and music: a taxonomy and future prospects. Int. J. Arts
and Technology 9, 4–25, (2016).
[17] Luschi, P., Del Seppia, C., Crosio, E.: Orientation during short–range feeding in the crab Dotilla
wichmanni. J. Comp. Physiol. A181, 461–468 (1997).
[18] Machado, P., Martins, T., Amaro, H., Abreu, P. H.: An interface for fitness function design. In: Romero,
J., McDermott, J., Correia, J. (eds.), Evolutionary and Biologically Inspired Music, Sound, Art and
Design. pp. 13–25, Springer, Berlin (2014).
[19] Mallon, B., Redies, C., Hayn–Leichsenring, G. U.: Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast
and statistical properties. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 161–1–14 (2014).
[20] Mohan, P. M., Pandey, P., Vijay, D., Dhivya, P.: Studies on morphology and orientation of pseudofaecal
pellets of sand bubbler crab. Jour. Coast. Env. 2, 129–142 (2011).
[21] Neumann, A., Bradley, A., Neumann, F.: Evolutionary image transition using random walks. In:
Correia, J., Ciesielski, V., Liapis, A. (eds.) Computational Intelligence in Music, Sound, Art and
Design. pp. 230–245, Springer, Cham (2017).
13
[22] Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.): The Art of Artificial Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and
Music. Springer, New York (2008).
[23] Ross, B. J., Ralph, W., Zong, H.: Evolutionary image synthesis using a model of aesthetics. In: Yen, G.
G. (ed.), Proc. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE CEC 2006. pp. 1087–1094 , IEEE
Press, Piscataway, NJ (2006).
[24] Spehar, B., Clifford, C. W., Newell, B. R., Taylor, R. P.: Universal aesthetic of fractals. Computers &
Graphics, 27, 813–820, (2003).
[25] Urbano, P.: The T. albipennis sand painting artists. In: Di Chio, C., et al. (eds.) Applications of
Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2011. pp. 414–423, Springer, Berlin (2011).
14
| 2cs.AI
|
ICA based on the data asymmetry
arXiv:1701.09160v1 [math.ST] 31 Jan 2017
P. Spurek, J. Tabor
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza 6,
30-348 Cracow, Poland
P. Rola
Department of Mathematics of the Cracow University of Economics, Rakowicka 27,
31-510 Cracow, Poland
M. Ociepka
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza 6,
30-348 Cracow, Poland
Abstract
Independent Component Analysis (ICA) - one of the basic tools in data analysis - aims to find a coordinate system in which the components of the data
are independent. Most of existing methods are based on the minimization
of the function of fourth-order moment (kurtosis). Skewness (third-order
moment) has received much less attention.
In this paper we present a competitive approach to ICA based on the
Split Gaussian distribution, which is well adapted to asymmetric data. Consequently, we obtain a method which works better than the classical approaches, especially in the case when the underlying density is not symmetric,
which is a typical situation in the color distribution in images.
Keywords: ICA, Split Normal distribution, skewness.
1. Introduction
Independent component analysis (ICA) is one of the most popular methods of data analysis and preprocessing. Historically, Herault and Jutten [1]
Email addresses: [email protected],[email protected]
(P. Spurek, J. Tabor), [email protected] (P. Rola)
Preprint submitted to Pattern Recognition
February 1, 2017
seem to be the first (around 1983) to have addressed the problem of ICA to
separate mixtures of independent signals.
In signal processing ICA is a computational method for separating a
multivariate signal into additive subcomponents and has been applied in
magnetic resonance [2], MRI [3, 4], EEG analysis [5, 6, 7], fault detection [8],
financial time series [9] and seismic recordings [10]. Moreover, it is hard to
overestimate the role of ICA in pattern recognition and image analysis; its
applications include face recognition [11, 12], facial action recognition [13],
image filtering [14], texture segmentation [15], object recognition [16, 17],
image modeling [18], embedding graphs in pattern-spaces [19, 20], multi-label
learning [21] and feature extraction [22]. The calculation of ICA is discussed
in several papers [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29], where the problem is given
various names, in particular it is also called “source separation problem”.
ICA is similar in many aspects to principal component analysis (PCA). In
PCA we look for an orthonormal change of basis so that the components are
not linearly dependent (uncorrelated). ICA can be described as a search for
the optimal basis (coordinate system) in which the components are independent. Let us now, for the readers convenience, describe how the ICA works.
Data is represented by the random vector x and the components as the random vector s. The aim is to transform the observed data x into maximally
independent components s with respect to some measure of independence.
Typically we use a linear static transformation W , called the transformation
matrix, combined with the formula s = W x.
Most ICA methods are based on the maximization of non-Gaussianity.
This follows from the fact that one of the theoretical foundations of ICA is
given by the dual view at the Central Limit Theorem [30], which states that
the distribution of the sum (average or linear combination) of N independent
random variables approaches Gaussian as N → ∞. Obviously if all source
variables are Gaussian, ICA will not work.
The classical measure of non-Gaussianity is kurtosis (the forth central
moment), which can be both positive or negative. Random variables that
have a negative kurtosis are called subgaussian, and those with the positive
one are called supergaussian. Supergaussian random variables have typically
a “spiky” pdf with heavy tails, i.e. the pdf is relatively large at zero and
at large values of the variable, while being small for intermediate values (ex.
the Laplace distribution). Typically non-Gaussianity is measured by the
absolute value of kurtosis (the square of kurtosis can also be used). Thus
many methods of finding independent components are based on fitting a
2
Figure 1: Comparison of images separation by our method (ICASG ), with FastICA and
ProDenICA.
density with similar kurtosis as the data, and consequently are very sensitive
to the existence of outliers. Moreover, typically data sets are bounded, and
therefore the credible estimation of tails is not easy. Another problem with
these methods, is that they usually assume that the underlying density is
symmetric, which is rarely the case.
In our work we introduce and explore a new approach ICASG , based on
the asymmetry of the data, which can be measured by the third central moment (skewness). Any symmetric data, in particular gaussian, has skewness
equal to zero. Negative values of skewness indicate the data skewed to the left
and the positive ones indicate the data skewed to the right1 . Consequently,
1
By skewed to the left, we mean that the left tail is long relative to the right tail.
Similarly, skewed to the right means that the long tail is on the right-hand side.
3
skewness is a natural measure of non-Gaussianity. In our approach, instead
of approximating the data by product of densities with heavy tails, we approximate it by a product of asymmetric densities (so called Split Gaussians).
Contrary to classical approaches which consider third or fourth central
moment, our algorithm is based on second moments. This is a consequence
of the fact that Split Gaussian distributions arise from merging two opposite
halves of normal distributions in their common mode (for more information
see Section 4). Therefore we use only second order moments to describe
skewness in dataset, and therefore we obtain an effective ICA method which
is resistant to outliers.
Figure 2: MLE estimation for image histograms with respect to Logistic and Split Gaussian
distributions.
The results of classical ICA and ICASG in the case of image separation
(for more detail comparison we refer to Section 6) is presented in Fig. 1. In
the experiment we mixed two images (see Fig. 1 a) by adding and subtracting
them (see Fig. 1 b). Our approach gives essentially better results than the
classical FastICA approach, compare Fig. 1 c) to Fig. 1 d) and Fig. 1 f) to
Fig. 1 g). In the case of classical ICA we can see artifacts in background,
which means that the method does not separate signal properly. On the other
hand, ProDenICA and ICASG almost perfectly recovered images, compare
Fig. 1 c) to Fig. 1 e) and Fig. 1 f) to Fig. 1 h).
In general, ICASG in most cases gives better results than other ICA methods, see Section 6, while its numerical complexity lies below the methods
4
Figure 3: Comparison between our approach and classical ICA in the case of resistance
on outliers.
which obtain comparable results, that is ProDenICA and PearsonICA. This
is caused in particular by the fact that asymmetry is more common than
heavy tails in real data sets – we performed the symmetry test by using R
package lawstat [31] with 5 percent confidence ratio, and it occurred that
all image datasets we used in our paper have asymmetric densities. We also
verified it in the case of density estimation of our images. We found optimal
parameters of Logistic and Split Gaussian distributions and compared the
values of MLE function in Fig. 2. As we see, in most cases Split Gaussian
distribution fits the data better than the Logistic one.
Summarizing the results obtained in the paper, our method works better than classical approaches for asymmetric data, and is more resistant to
outliers (see Example 1.1).
Example 1.1. We consider the data with heavy tails (a sample from the
Logistic distribution) and skewed ones (a sample from the Split Normal distribution). We added to the data outliers uniformly generated from rectangle [min(X1 ) − sd(X1 ), max(X1 ) + sd(X1 )] × [min(X2 ) − sd(X2 ), max(X2 ) +
sd(X2 )], where sd(Xi ) is a standard deviation of the i-th coordinate of X. In
Fig. 3 we present how the absolute value of the Tucker’s congruence coefficient (the similarity measure of extracted factors, see Section 6) is changing
when we add the outliers.
As we see, ICASG is more stable and deals better with outliers in the
5
Figure 4: Logistic, Split Normal and Classical Gaussian distribution fitted to data with
heavy tails and skew one.
data, which follows from the fact that classical ICA typically depends on the
moments of order four, while our approach uses moments of order two.
This paper is arranged as follows. In the second section, we discuss related
works. In the third, the theoretical background of our approach to ICA
is presented. We introduce a cost function which uses the General Split
Gaussian distribution and show that it is enough to minimize it respectively
to only two parameters: vector m ∈ Rd and d×d matrix W . We also calculate
the gradient of the cost function, which is necessary for the efficient use in the
minimization procedure. The last section describes numerical experiments.
The effects of our algorithm are illustrated on simulated and real datasets.
2. Related works
Various ICA methods were discussed in [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Herault
and Jutten seem to be the first who introduced the ICA around 1983. They
proposed an iterative real-time algorithm based on a neuro-mimetic architecture, which nevertheless, can show the lack of convergence in a number
of cases [32]. It is worth mentioning that in their framework, higher-order
statistics were not introduced explicitly. Giannakis et al. [33] addressed the
6
issue of identifiability of ICA in 1987 using third-order cumulants. However,
the resulting algorithm required an exhaustive search.
Lacoume and Ruiz [34] sketched a mathematical approach to the problem using higher-order statistics, which can be interpreted as a measure of
fitting independent components. Cardoso [35, 36] focused on the algebraic
properties of the fourth-order cumulants (kurtosis) what is still a popular
approach [37]. Unfortunately kurtosis has some drawbacks in practice, when
its value has to be estimated from a measured sample. The main problem is
that kurtosis can be very sensitive to the outliers. Its value may depend on
only a few observations in the tails of the distribution. In high-dimensional
problems, where separation process contains PCA (for dimension reduction),
whitening (for scale normalization), and standard ICA this effect is called a
small sample size problem [38, 39]. This is caused by the fact that for the
high-dimensional data sets ICA algorithms tend to extract the independent
features simply by the projections that isolate single or very few samples (outliers). To address the difficulty random pursuit and locality pursuit methods
were applied [39].
Another commonly used solution is to use skewness [40, 41, 42, 43] instead
of kurtosis. Unfortunately, skewness has received much less attention than
kurtosis, and consequently methods based on skewness are usually not well
theoretically justified.
One of the most popular ICA method dedicated to the skew data is
PearsonICA [44, 45], which minimizes mutual information using a Pearson
[46] system-based parametric model. The model covers a wide class of source
distributions including skewed distributions. The Pearson system is defined
by the differential equation
f 0 (x) =
(a1 x − a0 )f (x)
,
b0 + b1 x + b2 x 2
where a0 , a1 , b0 , b1 and b2 are the parameters of the distribution. The parameters of the Pearson system can be estimated using the method of moments.
Therefore such algorithms have strong limitations connected with the optimization procedure. The main problems are number of parameters which
have to be fitted and numerical efficiency of the minimization procedure.
An important measure of fitting independent components is given by negentropy [47]. FastICA [48], one of the most popular implementations of
ICA, uses this approach. Negentropy is based on the information-theoretic
7
quantity of (differential) entropy. This concept leads to the mutual information which is the natural information-theoretic measure of the independence
of random variables. Consequently, one can use it as the criterion for finding
the ICA transformation [28, 49]. It can be shown that minimization of the
mutual information is roughly equivalent to maximization of negentropy and
it is easier to estimate since we do not need additional parameters. ProDenICA [50, 51] is based not on a single nonlinear function, but on an entire
function space of candidate nonlinearities. In particular, the method works
with the functions in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and make use of the
“kernel trick” to search over this space efficiently. The use of a function space
makes it possible to adapt to a variety of sources and thus makes ProDenICA
algorithms more robust to varying source distributions.
A somewhat similar approach to ICA is based on the maximum likelihood
estimation [27]. It is closely connected to the infomax principle since the
likelihood is proportional to the negative of mutual information. In recent
publications, the maximum likelihood estimation is one of the mot popular
[24, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57] approaches to ICA. Maximum likelihood approach
needs the source pdf. In the classical ICA it is common to use the superGaussian logistic density or other heavy tails distributions.
In this paper we present ICASG , a method which joins the positive aspects of classical ICASG approaches with recent ones like ProDenICA or
Pearson ICA. First of all we use a General Split Gaussian distribution, which
uses second order moments to describe skewness in dataset, and therefore is
relatively robust to noise or outliers. The GSG distribution can be fitted
by minimizing a simple function, which depends on only two parameters
m ∈ Rd , W ∈ M(Rd ), see Theorem 5.1. Moreover we calculate its gradient,
and therefore we can use numerically efficient gradient type algorithms, see
Theorem 5.2.
3. Theoretical justification
Let us describe the idea2 behind ICA [30]. Suppose that we have a random
vector X in Rd which is generated by the model with the density F . Then
it is well-known that components of X are independent iff there exist onedimensional densities f1 , . . . , fd ∈ DR , where by DR we denote the set of
2
In fact it is one of the possible approaches, as there are many explanations which lead
to similar formula.
8
Figure 5: Logistic and General Split Normal distributions fitted to data with heavy tails
and skew ones.
densities on R, such that
F (x) = f1 (x1 ) · . . . · fd (xd ), for x = (x1 , . . . , xd ) ∈ Rd .
Now suppose that the components of X are not independent, but that we
know (or suspect) that there is a basis A (we put W = A−1 ) such that in that
base the components of X become independent. This may be formulated in
the form
F (x) = det(W ) · f1 (ω1T (x − m)) · . . . · fd (ωdT (x − m)) for x ∈ Rd ,
9
(3.1)
where ωiT (x − m) is the i-th coefficient of x − m (the basis is centered in m)
in the basis A (ωi denotes the i-th column of W ). Observe, that for a fixed
family of one-dimensional densities F ⊂ DR , the set of all densities given by
(3.1) for fi ∈ F, forms an affine invariant set of densities.
Thus, if we want to find such a basis that components become independent, we need to search for a matrix W and one-dimensional densities such
that the approximation
F (x) ≈ det(W ) · f1 (ω1T (x − m)) · . . . · fd (ωdT (x − m)), for x ∈ Rd ,
is optimal. However, before proceeding to practical implementations, we
need to precise:
1. how to measure the above approximation,
2. how to deal with data X, since we do not have the density,
3. how to work with the family of all possible densities.
The answer to the first point is simple and is given by the Kullback-Leibler
divergence, which is defined to be the integral:
Z ∞
p(x)
dx,
DKL (P kQ) =
p(x) log
q(x)
−∞
where p and q denote the densities of P and Q. This can be written as
DKL (P kQ) = h(P ) − M LE(P, Q),
where h is the classical Shannon entropy. Thus to minimize the KullbackLeibler divergence, we can equivalently maximize the MLE. This is helpful,
since for a discrete data X we have nice estimator of the LE (likelihood
estimation):
1 X
LE(X, Q) =
ln(q(x)).
|X| x∈X
Thus we arrive at the following problem.
Problem [reduced]. Let X be a data set. Find an unmixing matrix W ,
center m, and densities f1 , . . . , fd ∈ DR so that the value
LE(X, f1 , . . . , fd , m, W ) =
P
1
ln(f1 (ω1T (x − m)) . . . fd (ωdT (x − m))) + ln(det(W )) =
|X|
1
|X|
x∈X
d P
P
ln(fi (ωiT (x − m))) + ln(det(W ))
i=1 x∈X
10
is maximized.
However, there is still a problem with the last point, as the search over the
space of all densities DR is not feasible. Thus, we naturally have to reduce
our search to a subclass of all densities F (which should be parametrized by
a finite amount of parameters).
Problem [final]. Let X ⊂ Rd be a data set and F ⊂ DR be a set of densities.
Find an unmixing matrix W , center m, and densities f1 , . . . , fd ∈ F so that
the value
d
1 XX
ln(fi (ωiT (x − m))) + ln(det(W ))
|X| i=1 x∈X
is maximized.
It may seem that the most natural choice is Gaussian densities. However,
this is not the case as Gaussian densities are affine invariant, and therefore
do not “prefer” any fixed choice of coordinates3 . In other words we have to
choose a family of densities which is distant from Gaussian ones.
In the classical ICA approach it is common to use the super-Gaussian
logistic distribution:
f (x; µ, s) =
e
x−µ
s
s 1+e
1
2 x−µ
sech
.
=
x−µ 2
4s
2s
s
The main difference between the gaussian and super-gaussian is the existence
of the heavy tails. This can be also viewed as the difference in the fourth
moments.
However, such a choice leads to some negative consequences, namely the
model is very sensitive to outliers. Moreover, if the data is not-symmetric,
the approximation could not give the expected results, as the model consists
only of symmetric densities.
The idea behind this paper was to choose the model of densities which
wouldn’t have the two above disadvantages. So, instead of choosing the
family which differs from the Gaussians by the size of tail (fourth moment),
we chose a family which would allow estimation of asymmetric densities –
Split Gaussian distribution [58].
3
In fact one can observe that the choice of gaussian densities leads to PCA, if we restrict
to the case of orthonormal bases
11
Figure 6: Level sets of the General Split Normal distribution with different parameters.
Example 3.1. In Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 we present a comparison between the
Logistic and the Split Normal distribution in 1d and 2d respectively. In experiments we use the classical skew dataset Lymphoma [59, 60] and the classical
heavy tails dataset Australian athletes [61]. In the case of heavy tails both
methods work nice, since real dataset represent heavy tails which are not symmetric and the skew model is able to detect it. On the other hand, in the case
of skew data Split Normal gives essentially better results.
4. Split Gaussian distribution
In this section we present our density model. A natural direction for extending the normal distribution is the introduction of some skewness, and
several proposals have indeed emerged, both in the univariate and multivariate case, see [62, 63, 64]. One of the most popular approaches is the Split
Normal (SN) distribution, or the Split Gaussian (SG) distribution [58]. In
our paper we use a generalization of this model, which we call the General
Split Normal (GSN) distribution.
12
We start from the one-dimensional case. After that we present a possible generalization of this definition to the multidimensional setting, which
corresponds with the formula (3.1). Contrary to the Split Gaussian distribution, we skip the assumption of the orthogonality of coordinates (often called
principal components), and obtain an ICA model.
4.1. One-dimensional case
The density of the one-dimensional Split Gaussian distribution is given
by the formula
for x ≤ m,
c · exp[− 2σ1 2 (x − m)2 ],
2
2
SN (x; m, σ , τ ) =
1
2
c · exp[− 2τ 2 σ2 (x − m) ], for x > m,
q
where c = π2 σ −1 (1 + τ )−1 .
As we see the split normal distribution arises from merging two opposite
halves of two probability density functions of normal distributions in their
common mode. In general the use of the Split Gaussian distribution (even
in 1D) allows to fit data with better precision (from the likelihood function
point of view). In 1982 John [65] showed that the likelihood function can be
expressed in an intensive form, in which the scale parameters σ and τ are
a function of the location parameter m (see Theorem 3.1 proved by [64]).
Thanks to this theorem we can maximize the likelihood function numerically with respect to a single parameter m only. The rest of parameters are
explicitly given by simple formulas.
4.2. Multidimensional Split Gaussian distribution
A natural generalization of the univariate split normal distribution to the
multivariate settings was presented by [64]. Roughly speaking, authors assume that a vector x ∈ Rd follows the multivariate Split Normal distribution,
if its principal components are orthogonal and follow the one-dimensional
Split Normal distribution.
Definition 4.1 (Definition 2.2. [64]). A density of the multivariate Split
Normal distribution is given by
SNd (x; m, Σ, τ ) =
d
Y
SN (ωjT (x − m); 0, σj2 , τj2 ),
j=1
13
where ωj is the eigenvector corresponding to the j-th largest eigenvalue in
the spectral decomposition of Σ = W AW T and m = [m1 , . . . , md ]T , A =
diag(σ12 , . . . , σd2 ) and τ = [τ12 , . . . , τd2 ].
One can easily observe that the principal components ωjT x are independent.
For this generalization a similar theorem, like in the one-dimensional case,
is valid. We can extract the maximum likelihood estimation by maximizing
the function with respect to two parameters m ∈ Rd and W ∈ Md (R)
where columns of W are orthonormal vectors (Md (R) denotes the set of
d-dimensional square matrices).
We may use this theorem for numerical maximization of the likelihood
function w.r.t. m and W . Unfortunately, the optimization process on Stiefel
manifold (the set of orthogonal matrices) studied by [66] is numerically ineffective and requires additional tools. This problem can be omitted by using
Eulerian angles described by [67]. In the two-dimensional case, W is explicitly parametrized as
π
π
cos(θ) sin(θ)
W =
, − <θ≤ .
− sin(θ) cos(θ)
2
2
In such a case we can straightforwardly apply standard numerical optimization algorithm.
Both of these solutions can be applied. Nevertheless, unnatural assumption of the orthogonality of principal components causes two negative effects:
the optimization process is time consuming and the model with the restriction that the coordinates are orthogonal can not accommodate data as good
as the general one. Therefore, in this article we use more flexible model –
the General Split Normal [68] distribution:
Definition 4.2. A density of the multivariate General Split Normal distribution is given by
2
2
GSNd (x; m, W, σ , τ ) = det(W )
d
Y
SN (ωjT (x − m); 0, σj2 , τj2 ),
j=1
where ωj is the j-th column of non-singular matrix W , m = (m1 , . . . , md )T ,
σ = (σ1 , . . . , σd ) and τ = (τ1 , . . . , τd ).
14
Figure 7: Comparison between fitting Gaussian, Split Gaussian and General Split distribution on [59, 60]. Observe that, contrary to Split Gaussian, General Split Gaussian does
not have orthogonal basis.
Our model is a natural generalization of the multivariate Split Normal
distribution proposed in [64] (see Definition 4.1) and is given in the form
formulated by (3.1) for the set of Split Gaussian densities. Clearly every
Split Normal distribution is a General Split Normal distribution.
The above generalization is flexible and allows to fit data with greater
precision, see Fig. 7. The level sets of the GSN distribution with different
parameters are presented in Fig. 6. We skip the constraints of orthogonality
of the principal components. Consequently, we can apply the standard optimization procedure directly. In the next section we discuss how to fit data
in our model.
5. Maximum likelihood estimation
In the previous section we introduced the GSN distribution. Now we show
how to use the likelihood estimation in our setting. As it was mentioned, we
have to maximize the likelihood function with respect to four parameters. In
the case of the General Split Normal distribution (contrary to the classical
Gaussian one) we do not have explicit formulas and consequently we heave
to solve the optimization problem.
In the first subsection, we reduce our problem to the simpler one by
introducing the function l. Minimization of l is equivalent to maximization of
the likelihood function. In the second subsection we present how to minimize
our function by using the gradient method.
15
5.1. Optimization problem
The density of the GSN distribution depends on four parameters m ∈ Rd ,
W ∈ M(Rd ), σ ∈ Rd , τ ∈ Rd . We can find them by minimizing the simpler
function, which depends on only m ∈ Rd and W ∈ M(Rd ). Other parameters
are given by explicit formulas.
Theorem 5.1. Let x1 , . . . , xn be given. Then the likelihood maximized w.r.t.
σ and τ is
−3n/2
dn/2
d
Y
1
2n
gj (m, W )
,
(5.1)
L̂(X; m, W ) =
2
πe
|det(W )| 3 j=1
where
1/3
1/3
gj (m, W ) = s1j + s2j ,
s1j =
P
[ωjT (xi − m)]2 , Ij = {i = 1, . . . , n : ωjT (xi − m) ≤ 0},
i∈Ij
s2j =
P
i∈Ijc
[ωjT (xi − m)]2 , Ijc = {i = 1, . . . , n : ωjT (xi − m) > 0},
and the maximum likelihood estimators of σj2 and τj are
σ̂j2 (m, W )
=
1 2/3
s g (m, W ),
n 1j j
τ̂j (m, W ) =
s2j
s1j
1/3
.
Proof. See Appendix 8.
Thanks to the above theorem, instead of looking for the maximum of
the likelihood function, it is enough to obtain the maximum of the simpler
function (5.1) which depends on two parameters m ∈ Rd and W ∈ M(Rd )
l(X; m, W ) =
d
Y
1
2
|det(W )| 3
gj (m, W ),
(5.2)
j=1
where ωj stands for the j-th column of matrix W . Consequently, maximization of (5.1) is equivalent to minimization of (5.2), see the following corollary.
Corollary 5.1. Let X ⊂ Rd , m ∈ Rd , W ∈ M(Rd ) be given, then
argmax L̂(X; m, W ) = argmin l(X; m, W ).
m,W
m,W
16
Figure 8: Results of image separation with the uses of various ICA algorithms.
5.2. Gradient
One of the possible methods of optimization is the gradient method. Since
the minimum of l is equal to the minimum of ln(l), in this subsection we
17
calculate the gradient of ln(l). Before we prove suitable Theorem 5.2, we
recall the following lemma.
Lemma 5.1. Let A = (aij )1≤i,j≤d be a differentiable map from real numbers
to d × d matrices then
∂det(A)
= adjT (A)ij ,
(5.3)
∂aij
where adj(A) stands for the adjugate of A, i.e. the transpose of the cofactor
matrix.
Proof. By the Laplace expansion detA =
d
P
(−1)i+j aij Mij where Mij is the
j=1
minor of the entry in the i-th row and j-th column. Hence
∂detA
= (−1)i+j Mij = adjT (A)ij .
∂aij
Now we are ready to calculate gradient of our cost function.
Theorem 5.2. Let X ⊂ Rd , m = (m1 , . . . , md )T ∈ Rd , W = (ωij )1≤i,j≤d non
T
)
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
singular be given. Then ∇m ln l(X; m, W ) = ∂ ln l(X;m,W
,
.
.
.
,
,
∂m1
∂md
where
d
P T
P T
P
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
1
1
−1
2ωj (xi − m)ωjk + 2
2ωj (xi − m)ωjk .
=
1
1
2
∂mk
3 +s 3
j=1 s1j
2j
3
3s1j
i∈Ij
Moreover, ∇W ln l(X; m, W ) =
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
∂ωpk
−2
+ 31 s2p3
P
i∈Ipc
=
− 23 (ω −1 )Tpk
+
h
3
3s2j
i∈Ijc
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
∂ωpk
1
1
1
3 +s 3
s1p
2p
i
2
1 −3
s
3 1p
, where
1≤p,k≤d
P
2ωpT (xi − m)(xik − mk )+
i∈Ip
T
2ωp (xi − m)(xik − mk ) ,
and
s1j =
P
[ωjT (xi − m)]2 , Ij = {i = 1, . . . , n : ωjT (xi − m) ≤ 0},
i∈Ij
s2j =
P
i∈Ijc
[ωjT (xi − m)]2 , Ijc = {i = 1, . . . , n : ωjT (xi − m) > 0}.
18
Proof. See Appendix 9.
Thanks to the above theorem we can use gradient descent, a first-order
optimization algorithm. To find a local minimum of the cost function ln(l)
using gradient descent, one takes steps proportional to the negative of the
gradient of the function at the current point. If instead one takes steps
proportional to the positive of the gradient, one approaches a local maximum
of that function, see Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 :
Input
data set X
Initial conditions
initialization of mean vector m = mean(X)
initialization of matrix W = cov(X)
Gradient algorithm
obtain new values of m and V by applying gradient method for function
log(l) (see formula 5.1):
(m, W ) = argmin log(l(X; m̄, W̄ )),
m̄,W̄
where
∇m ln l(X; m, W )
∇W ln l(X; m, W )
are given by Theorem 5.2
calculate σ ∈ Rd and τ ∈ Rd by using Theorem 5.1
Return value
return optimal ICA basis (m, W ).
At the end of this section we present comparison of computational efficiency between ICASG and various ICA methods, see Fig. 9. In our experiment we consider the classical image separation problem, where we mixed
two images by adding and subtracting them. We use ten pairs of images.
Each pair was scaled to different sizes. In Fig. 9 we present mean value of
computation time. FastICA, Infomax and JADE are the most effective but
19
Figure 9: Comparison of computational efficiency between ICASG and various ICA methods.
do not solve the problem of image separation sufficiently well, see Tab. 1.
On the other hand, the ProDenICA which gives comparable result to ICASG ,
is much slower.
6. Experiments and analysis
To compare our method to classical ones we use Tucker’s congruence
coefficient [69] (uncentered correlation) defined by
Pd
Cr(s, s̄) = qP
d
i=1
si s̄i
qP
d
2
i=1
si
.
2
i=1 s̄i
Its values range between −1 and +1. It can be used to study the similarity of
extracted factors across different samples. Generally, a congruence coefficient
of 0.9 indicates a high degree of factor similarity, while a coefficient of 0.95
20
or higher indicates that the factors are virtually identical. In the case of
ICA methods multiplying by the scalar any of the sources do not change
results. Therefore the sign of congruence coefficient is not important and we
can compare absolute value of Tucker’s congruence.
We evaluate our method in the context of images, sound, hyperspectral unmixing and EEG data. For comparison we use R package ica [70],
PearsonICA [71], ProDenICA [72], tsBSS [73]. The most popular method
used in practice is FastICA [48, 74] algorithm, which uses negentropy. In
this context we can use three different functions to estimate neg-entropy: logcosh, exp and kurtosis. We also compare our method with algorithm using
Information-Maximization (Infomax) approach [49]. Similarly to FastICA
we consider three possible nonlinear functions: hyperbolic tangent, logistic
and extended Infomax. We also consider algorithm which uses Joint Approximate Diagonalization of Eigenmatrices (JADE) proposed by Cardoso
and Souloumiac’s [75, 75, 74].
One of the most popular ICA methods dedicated for skew data is PearsonICA [44, 45], which minimizes mutual information using a Pearson [46]
system-based parametric model. Another model we consider is ProDenICA
[50, 51], which is based not on a single nonlinear function, but on an entire
function space of candidate nonlinearities. In particular, the method works
with the functions in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and make use of
the kernel trick to search over this space efficiently. We also compare our
method with FixNA [76], method for blind source separation problem.
6.1. Separation of images
One of the most popular application of ICA is the separation of images.
In our experiments we use four images from the USC-SIPI Image Database of
size 256 × 256 pixels (4.1.01, 4.1.06, 4.1.02, 4.1.03) and eight of size 512 × 512
pixels (4.2.04, 4.2.02, boat.512, elaine.512, 5.2.10, 5.2.08, 5.3.01, 4.2.03). We
also use 8 images from the Berkeley Segmentation Dataset of size 482 ×
321 with indexes (#119082, #42049, #43074, #38092, #157055, #220075,
#295087, #167062). We make random pairs of above images
and use
them
1 1
as a source signal, combined by the mixing matrix A =
. From
1 −1
practical point of view, we simply obtain two new images by adding and
dividing sources pictures. Our goal is to reconstruct original images by using
only the knowledge about mixed ones. The visualization of this process we
21
ICASG
4.1.01
4.1.02
4.1.06
4.1.03
4.2.04
5.2.10
4.2.02
5.2.08
boat.512
5.3.01
elaine.512
4.2.03
119082
157055
42049
220075
43074
295087
38092
167062
-0.9818
0.992
-0.9609
0.5664
-0.5034
0.2893
0.2305
0.5717
0.3593
0.4316
0.5874
-0.0226
0.9987
0.389
-0.7493
0.4359
-0.7371
-0.3997
-0.5949
0.3255
FastICA
logcosh
exp
0.5481 -0.5457
0.6696 0.6644
-0.4297 -0.4297
0.2062 0.2062
0.0506 0.0528
-0.0719 -0.0749
-0.0376 0.0203
0.1037 -0.0625
0.0351 0.0314
0.0078 0.0138
0.32
0.32
-0.3196 -0.3196
0.5736 0.5736
-0.3619 -0.3619
0.3009 0.3028
-0.5087 -0.5154
0.0344 0.0323
-0.048 -0.0458
0.0555 0.0564
-0.0025 -0.0041
kurtosis
-0.5485
0.6707
-0.4296
0.2057
-0.0499
0.0709
-0.0017
-0.0097
-0.056
-0.0262
-0.32
0.3201
0.5731
-0.3618
-0.299
0.503
0.0429
-0.0566
0.031
0.0425
Infomax
JADE PearsonICA
tanh
tangent logistic
0.548
-0.5484 -0.548 -0.5492
-0.5308
0.6695 0.6705 0.6695
0.6726
0.6696
-0.4297 -0.4297 -0.4296 -0.4296
-0.4297
0.2061
0.206
0.2058
0.2058
-0.2062
0.0505 -0.0512 0.0508
0.0397
0.3123
-0.0717 0.0727 -0.0722 -0.057
-0.4275
0.0377 0.0265 0.0061 -0.0093
-0.1228
-0.1039 -0.0773 -0.0285 0.0086
-0.2913
0.0343 -0.0449 0.0298
0.0356
-0.1046
0.0091
-0.008
0.0164
0.007
0.1061
0.32
-0.32
0.32
0.32
-0.32
-0.3196 0.3199 -0.3196 -0.3202
-0.3195
0.5737 0.5733 0.5735
0.5735
-0.032
-0.3619 -0.3619 -0.3619 -0.3619
0.0046
-0.3005 -0.3031 -0.3007 -0.2898
0.2596
0.5074 0.5168 0.5081
0.4789
0.4838
0.0348 0.0404 0.0342
0.0324
0.0891
-0.0484 -0.0541 -0.0478 -0.0459
-0.1035
-0.0553
0.041
0.0557
0.0375
0.0535
0.0021 0.0241 -0.0029 0.0306
0.0011
ProDenICA
FixNA
-0.0013
-0.0981
0.4297
0.207
-0.3164
0.4334
0.1282
-0.3091
-0.0461
0.0486
0.0287
-0.048
0.5744
0.3619
0.0421
-0.0645
0.3925
0.4015
0.4036
0.7404
0.5503
-0.6761
0.0148
0.0127
0.1461
-0.1979
0.1235
-0.2931
0.3175
-0.5303
0.2282
-0.2554
0.3695
-0.2446
0.142
-0.1839
0.2458
-0.2406
0.2614
-0.5495
Table 1: The Tucker’s congruence coefficient measure between original images and results
of different ICA algorithms.
present in Fig. 8. The results of this experiment are presented in Tab. 1
where we exhibit Tucker’s congruence coefficients.
In the case of the Tucker’s congruence coefficient measure almost in all
situation we obtain better results. The ICASG method essentially better
recovers original signals. In Fig. 8 we can sow that ICASG almost perfectly
recovers source signal.
6.2. Cocktail-party problem
In this subsection we compare our method with classical ones in the case
of cocktail-party problem. Imagine that you are in a room where two people
are speaking simultaneously. You have two microphones, which you hold
in different locations. The microphones give you two recorded time signals,
which we could interpret as mixed signal x. Each of these recorded signals
is a weighted sum of the speech signals emitted by the two speakers, which
we denote by s. The cocktail-party problem is to estimate the two original
speech signals.
In our experiments we use signal obtained by mixing synthetic sources4
4
We use signals from http://research.ics.aalto.fi/ica/cocktail/cocktail_en.
cgi.
22
ICASG
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
source
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
0.1597
0.7739
0.1388
0.9435
0.1985
0.8453
0.232
0.7679
0.1728
0.9424
0.15
0.7417
0.1036
0.908
0.1166
0.8212
logcosh
0.1097
0.7705
0.0899
0.9075
0.079
0.8887
0.0989
0.7798
0.0989
0.9245
0.0404
0.7129
0.0839
0.9016
0.1153
0.8136
FastICA
exp
0.1096
0.7713
0.0899
0.9076
0.0791
0.8882
0.0989
0.7799
0.099
0.9243
0.0404
0.7134
0.084
0.9015
0.1156
0.8116
kurtosis
0.1101
0.7672
0.0908
0.898
0.079
0.8889
0.099
0.7793
0.0988
0.9256
0.0402
0.707
0.0839
0.9019
0.1145
0.8195
tanh
0.1097
0.7705
0.0899
0.9074
0.079
0.8887
0.0989
0.7798
0.0989
0.9246
0.0404
0.7132
0.0839
0.9019
0.1152
0.8141
Infomax
tangent
0.11
0.7685
0.0899
0.907
0.079
0.8892
0.0989
0.7798
0.0989
0.925
0.0404
0.7125
0.0839
0.9019
0.1148
0.8174
logistic
0.1097
0.7705
0.0899
0.9074
0.079
0.8887
0.0989
0.7798
0.0989
0.9246
0.0404
0.7129
0.0839
0.9017
0.1153
0.8138
JADE
PearsonICA
ProDenICA
FixNA
0.1101
0.7704
0.0908
0.9075
0.079
0.8898
0.099
0.7801
0.0989
0.9245
0.0402
0.7124
0.0839
0.9014
0.1155
0.8165
0.1097
0.7704
0.0899
0.9075
0.0789
0.8898
0.0989
0.7801
0.0989
0.9245
0.0404
0.7124
0.084
0.9014
0.1149
0.8165
0.1412
0.9998
0.0984
0.9989
0.0843
0.8459
0.1153
0.9344
0.0963
0.9729
0.0567
0.9998
0.093
0.9999
0.1427
0.9996
0.109
0.7751
0.0907
0.8988
0.0791
0.8882
0.0989
0.7796
0.0987
0.9273
0.0402
0.7099
0.0836
0.9056
0.1147
0.8176
Table 2: The Tucker’s congruence coefficient measure between original sound and results
of different ICA algorithms in the case of cocktail-party problem.
1 1
(similar as before we use mixing matrix A =
). Comparison between
1 −1
methods we present in Tab. 2. In the case of cocktail-party problem our
method recovers sources signal better then classical methods.
6.3. Hyperspectral Unmixing
Independent component analysis has been recently applied into hyperspectral unmixing as a result of its low computation time and its ability to
perform without prior information. However, when applying ICA for hyperspectral unmixing, the independence assumption in the ICA model conflicts
with the abundance sum-to-one constraint and the abundance nonnegative
constraint in the linear mixture model, which affects the hyperspectral unmixing accuracy. Nevertheless, ICA was recently applied in this area [77, 78].
In this subsection we apply simple example which shows that our method
can by used for spectral data.
Urban data [79, 80, 81] is one of the most widely used hyperspectral datasets used in the hyperspectral unmixing study. Each image has 307 × 307
pixels, each of which corresponds to a 2 × 2 m area. In this image, there
are 210 wavelengths ranging from 400 nm to 2500 nm, resulting in a spectral
resolution of 10 nm. After the channels 1–4, 76, 87, 101–111, 136–153 and
198–210 are removed (due to dense water vapor and atmospheric effects),
there remain 162 channels (this is a common preprocess for hyperspectral
unmixing analyses). There is ground truth [79, 80, 81], which contains 4
channels: #1 Asphalt, #2 Grass, #3 Tree and #4 Roof.
23
ICASG
#1 Asphalt
#2 Grass
#3 Tree
#4 Roof
0.6774
-0.7784
0.7267
0.6666
logcosh
0.2859
-0.2746
0.2338
-0.4256
FastICA
exp
0.2864
-0.2605
0.2717
0.4279
kurtosis
-0.2595
-0.2798
-0.2547
0.4167
Infomax
PearsonICA ProDenICA
tanh
tangent logistic
-0.2972 -0.2954 -0.2972
0.20978
0.4928
-0.2814 -0.2816 -0.2814
-0.2412
-0.4323
0.2441 0.2354 0.2442
0.2482
-0.5961
-0.4244 0.4301 -0.4244
0.4193
-0.6128
Table 3: The Tucker’s congruence coefficient measure between reference layers and results
of different ICA algorithms in the case of the urban data set.
Figure 10: Congruence distance between layers obtain by different ICA algorithms and
the closest reference channel.
A highly mixed area is cut from the original data set in this experiment
(similar example was showed in [77]), with the size of 200 × 150 pixels.
In our experiment we apply various ICA methods and report the Tucker’s
congruence coefficient measure between each layer and the closest reference
channel, see Fig. 10. ICASG and ProDenICA give layers which contain more
information then the other approaches. Distance between four best channels
to the reference ones we present in Tab. 3.
24
6.4. EEG
At the end of this section we present how our method works in the case
of EEG signals. In this context, ICA is applied to many different task like
eye movements, blinks, muscle, heart and line noise e.t.c.. In this experiment we concentrate on eye movement and blink artifacts. Our goal here is
to demonstrate that our method is capable of finding artifacts in real EEG
data. However, we emphasize that it does not provide a complete solution
to any of these practical problems. Such a solution usually entails a significant amount of domain-specific knowledge and engineering. Nevertheless,
from these preliminary results with EEG data, we believe that the method
presented in this paper provides a reasonable solution for signal separation,
which is simple and effective enough to be easily customized for a broad range
of practical problems.
For EEG analysis, the rows of the input matrix x are the EEG signals
recorded at different electrodes, the rows of the output data matrix s = W x
are time courses of activation of the ICA components, and the columns of the
inverse matrix, W , give the projection strengths of the respective components
onto the scalp sensors.
One EEG data set used in the analysis was collected from 40 scalp electrodes (see Fig. 11 a)). The second and the third are located very near to eye
and can be understood as a base (we can use them for removing eye blinking
artifacts). In Fig. 11 b) we present signals obtained by ICASG . The scale of
this figure is large but we can find the data which have spikes exactly in the
same place as the two base signals (see Fig. 11 c)). After removing selected
signal and going back to the original situation we obtain signal (see Fig. 11
d)) without eye blinking artifacts (compare Fig. 11 a) with Fig. 11 d)).
7. Conclusion
In our work we introduce and explore a new approach to ICA which is
based on the asymmetry of the data. Roughly speaking in our approach,
instead of approximating the data by product of densities with heavy tails,
we approximate it by a product of asymmetric densities – the Split Gaussian
distribution. Contrary to classical approaches which consider third or fourth
central moment, our algorithm in practice is based on second moments. This
is a consequence of the fact that Split Gaussian distributions arise from
merging two opposite halves of normal distributions in their common mode.
25
Figure 11: Results of ICASG in the case of EEG data.
Therefore we use only second order moments to describe skewness in dataset,
and therefore we obtain an effective ICA method which is resistant to outliers.
We verified our approach on images, sound and EEG data. In the case
of source signal reconstructing our approach gives essentially better results
(better recover original signals). The main reason is such that kurtosis is
very sensitive to the outliers and that the asymmetry of the data is more
popular than heavy tails in real data sets.
8. Appendix A
Proof of Theorem 5.1. Let X = {x1 , . . . , xn }. We write
zi = W (xi − m),
zij = ωjT (xi − m),
26
for observation i, where i = 1, . . . , n and coordinates j = 1, . . . , d.
Let us consider the likelihood function, i.e.
n
Q
L(X; m, W, σ, τ ) =
GSNd (xi ; m, W, σ, τ )
i=1
n
Q
d
Q
SN (ωjT (xi − m); 0, σj2 , τj2 )
i=1
j=1
n Q
−n Q
h
d
n Q
d
= c1 |det(W )|
σj (1 + τj )
exp −
=
|det(W )|
j=1
where c1 =
q d
2
π
i=1 j=1
1 2
z (1{zij ≤0}
2σj2 ij
i
+ τj−2 1{zij >0} ) ,
. Now we take the log-likelihood function, i.e.
ln(L(X; m, W, σ, τ ))
n Q
−n P
i
d
n P
d h
σj (1 + τj )
= ln c1 |det(W )|
+
− 2σ1 2 zij2 (1{zij ≤0} + τj−2 1{zij >0} )
j
j=1
i=1 j=1
n Q
−n
d
d
P −2 P 2
σ −2 P 2
σj
zij
= ln c1 |det(W )|
σj (1 + τj )
zij + τj2
− 12
j
j=1
j=1
i∈Ijc
i∈Ij
n Q
d
d
−n
P
1
= ln c1 |det(W )|
σj (1 + τj )
s1j + τ12 s2j .
−
2σ 2
j=1
j=1
j
j
We fix m, W and maximize the log-likelihood function over τ and σ. In
such a case we have to solve the following system of equations
∂ ln(L(X;m,W,σ,τ ))
∂σj
= − σnj + σj−3 (s1j + τj−2 s2j ) = 0,
∂ ln(L(X;m,W,σ,τ ))
∂τj
n
= − 1+τ
+
j
s2j
τj3 σj2
= 0,
for j = 1, . . . , d. By simple calculations we obtain the expressions for the
estimators
1/3
s2j
2
1 2/3
σ̂j (m, W ) = n s1j gj (m, W ),
τ̂j (m, W ) =
.
s1j
Substituting it into the log-likelihood function, we get
dn
Q
d
2
3 −n
dn
2
1
n
√
2
g (m, W )
e− 2
L̂(m, W ) = π
|det(W )| ·
n j
j=1
dn
− 3n2
d
2
Q
1
= 2n
.
g
(m,
W
)
2
j
πe
|det(W )| 3 j=1
27
9. Appendix B
Proof of Theorem 5.2. Let us start with the partial derivative of ln(l) with
respect to m. We have
1
1
d
d
d
3 +s 3 ) P
P
P
∂(s1j
∂ ln(gj (m,W ))
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
2j
1
1 ∂s1j
1 ∂s2j
1
=
=
.
1
1
2 ∂m +
2 ∂m
1
1
∂mk
∂mk
∂mk
k
k
3 +s 3
j=1 s1j
2j
j=1
Now, we need
∂s1j
∂mk
=
P
i∈Ij
∂s1j
∂mk
∂s2j
,
∂mk
and
∂[ωjT (xi −m)]2
∂mk
=
3 +s 3
j=1 s1j
2j
3
3s1j
3
3s2j
therefore
2ωjT (xi − m)
P
i∈Ij
∂ωjT (xi −m)
∂mk
=
P
−2ωjT (xi − m)ωjk .
i∈Ij
Analogously we get
∂s2j
∂mk
=
P
i∈Ijc
−2ωjT (xi − m)ωjk .
Hence
∂ ln l
∂mk
=
d
P
−1
1
1
3 +s 3
j=1 s1j
2j
1
2
P
3
3s1j
i∈Ij
2ωjT (xi
− m)ωjk +
1
2
P
3
3s2j
i∈Ijc
2ωjT (xi
− m)ωjk .
Now we calculate the partial derivative of ln l(X; m, W ) with respect to
the matrix W . We have
∂ ln l(X;m,W )
∂ωpk
2
=
∂ ln |det(W )|− 3
∂ωpk
+
d
P
j=1
∂ ln(gj (m,W ))
.
∂ωpk
To calculate the derivative of the determinant we use Jacobi’s formula (see
Lemma 5.1). Hence
2
5
2
∂ ln(det(W )− 3 )
)
2
3
=
det(W
)
det(W )− 3 ∂det(W
= − 23 det(W )−1 adjT (W )pk
−
∂ωpk
3
∂ωpk
1
det(W )(W −1 )Tpk = − 23 (ω −1 )Tpk ,
= − 32 det(W
)
where (ω −1 )Tpk is the element in the p-th row and k-th column of the matrix
(W −1 )T . Now we calculate
1
1
3 +s 3 )
∂(s1j
∂ ln(gj (m,W ))
2j
1
1
1 ∂s1j
1 ∂s2j
= 1 1 ∂ωpk = 1 1
+ 2 ∂ωpk ,
2 ∂ω
∂ωpk
pk
3 +s 3
s1j
2j
3 +s 3
s1j
2j
28
3
3s1j
3
3s2j
where
∂s1j
∂ωpk
(
=
0,
P
P
i∈Ij
∂[ωjT (xi −m)]2
∂ωpk
=
P
2ωjT (xi − m)
i∈Ij
∂ωjT (xi −m)
∂ωpk
=
if j =
6 p
2ωpT (xi − m)(xik − mk ), if j = p
i∈Ip
and xik is the k-th element of the vector xi . Analogously we get
(
0,
if j 6= p,
∂s2j
P T
=
2ωp (xi − m)(xik − mk ), if j = p.
∂ωpk
i∈I c
p
Hence we obtain
∂ ln l
∂ωpk
=
−2
+ 31 s2p3
− 32 (ω −1 )Tpk
P
i∈Ipc
+
1
1
1
3 +s 3
s1p
2p
2
1 −3
s
3 1p
P
2ωpT (xi − m)(xik − mk )
i∈Ip
2ωpT (xi − m)(xik − mk ) .
Acknowledgment
Research of P. Spurek was supported by the National Center of Science (Poland) grant no. 2015/19/D/ST6/01472. Research of J. Tabor was
supported by the National Center of Science (Poland) grant no. UMO2014/13/B/ST6/01792.
References
References
[1] J. Herault, C. Jutten, Space or time adaptive signal processing by neural
network models, in: Neural networks for computing, volume 151, AIP
Publishing, pp. 206–211.
[2] C. F. Beckmann, S. M. Smith, Probabilistic independent component
analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging, Medical Imaging,
IEEE Transactions on 23 (2004) 137–152.
29
[3] C. F. Beckmann, S. M. Smith, Tensorial extensions of independent component analysis for multisubject fmri analysis, Neuroimage 25 (2005)
294–311.
[4] P. A. Rodriguez, V. D. Calhoun, T. Adalı, De-noising, phase ambiguity
correction and visualization techniques for complex-valued ica of group
fmri data, Pattern recognition 45 (2012) 2050–2063.
[5] C. Brunner, M. Naeem, R. Leeb, B. Graimann, G. Pfurtscheller, Spatial filtering and selection of optimized components in four class motor imagery eeg data using independent components analysis, Pattern
Recognition Letters 28 (2007) 957–964.
[6] A. Delorme, T. Sejnowski, S. Makeig, Enhanced detection of artifacts
in eeg data using higher-order statistics and independent component
analysis, Neuroimage 34 (2007) 1443–1449.
[7] H. Zhang, H. Yang, C. Guan, Bayesian learning for spatial filtering in
an eeg-based brain–computer interface, IEEE transactions on neural
networks and learning systems 24 (2013) 1049–1060.
[8] S. W. Choi, E. B. Martin, A. J. Morris, I.-B. Lee, Fault detection based
on a maximum-likelihood principal component analysis (pca) mixture,
Industrial & engineering chemistry research 44 (2005) 2316–2327.
[9] K. Kiviluoto, E. Oja, Independent component analysis for parallel financial time series., in: ICONIP, volume 2, pp. 895–898.
[10] A. M. Haghighi, I. M. Haghighi, et al., An ica approach to purify
components of spatial components of seismic recordings, in: SPE Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
[11] J. Yang, X. Gao, D. Zhang, J.-y. Yang, Kernel ica: An alternative
formulation and its application to face recognition, Pattern Recognition
38 (2005) 1784–1787.
[12] I. Dagher, R. Nachar, Face recognition using ipca-ica algorithm, IEEE
transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 28 (2006) 996–
1000.
30
[13] C.-F. Chuang, F. Y. Shih, Recognizing facial action units using independent component analysis and support vector machine, Pattern
recognition 39 (2006) 1795–1798.
[14] D.-M. Tsai, P.-C. Lin, C.-J. Lu, An independent component analysisbased filter design for defect detection in low-contrast surface images,
Pattern Recognition 39 (2006) 1679–1694.
[15] R. Jenssen, T. Eltoft, Independent component analysis for texture segmentation, Pattern Recognition 36 (2003) 2301–2315.
[16] M. Bressan, D. Guillamet, J. Vitria, Using an ica representation of local
color histograms for object recognition, Pattern Recognition 36 (2003)
691–701.
[17] D. Tao, L. Jin, Y. Yuan, Y. Xue, Ensemble manifold rank preserving
for acceleration-based human activity recognition, IEEE transactions
on neural networks and learning systems 27 (2016) 1392–1404.
[18] K. I. Kim, M. O. Franz, B. Scholkopf, Iterative kernel principal component analysis for image modeling, IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27 (2005) 1351–1366.
[19] B. Luo, R. C. Wilson, E. R. Hancock, Spectral embedding of graphs,
Pattern recognition 36 (2003) 2213–2230.
[20] B. Luo, R. C. Wilson, E. R. Hancock, The independent and principal
component of graph spectra, in: Pattern Recognition, 2002. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on, volume 2, IEEE, pp. 164–167.
[21] C. Xu, T. Liu, D. Tao, C. Xu, Local rademacher complexity for multilabel learning, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 25 (2016) 1495–
1507.
[22] Z. Lai, Y. Xu, Q. Chen, J. Yang, D. Zhang, Multilinear sparse principal
component analysis, IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning
systems 25 (2014) 1942–1950.
[23] P. Secchi, S. Vantini, P. Zanini, Hierarchical independent component
analysis: a multi-resolution non-orthogonal data-driven basis, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 95 (2016) 133–149.
31
[24] A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis,
volume 46, John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
[25] T.-W. Lee, M. Girolami, T. J. Sejnowski, Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and
supergaussian sources, Neural computation 11 (1999) 417–441.
[26] J.-F. Cardoso, Source separation using higher order moments, in:
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1989. ICASSP-89., 1989 International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 2109–2112.
[27] D. T. Pham, P. Garat, Blind separation of mixture of independent
sources through a quasi-maximum likelihood approach, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 45 (1997) 1712–1725.
[28] P. Comon, Independent component analysis, a new concept?, Signal
processing 36 (1994) 287–314.
[29] B. Du, S. Wang, N. Wang, L. Zhang, D. Tao, L. Zhang, Hyperspectral
signal unmixing based on constrained non-negative matrix factorization
approach, Neurocomputing 204 (2016) 153–161.
[30] A. Hyvärinen, E. Oja, Independent component analysis: algorithms and
applications, Neural networks 13 (2000) 411–430.
[31] J. Gastwirth, G. Yulia, H. Wallace, L. Vyacheslav, M. Weiwen, N. Kimihiro, lawstat: Tools for Biostatistics, Public Policy, and Law, 2015. R
package version 3.0.
[32] C. Jutten, J. Herault, Blind separation of sources, part i: An adaptive
algorithm based on neuromimetic architecture, Signal processing 24
(1991) 1–10.
[33] G. B. Giannakis, Y. Inouye, J. M. Mendel, Cumulant based identification of multichannel moving-average models, Automatic Control, IEEE
Transactions on 34 (1989) 783–787.
[34] J.-L. Lacoume, P. Ruiz, Separation of independent sources from correlated inputs, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 40 (1992) 3074–
3078.
32
[35] J.-F. Cardoso, Super-symmetric decomposition of the fourth-order cumulant tensor. blind identification of more sources than sensors, in:
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 1991. ICASSP-91., 1991 International Conference on, IEEE, pp. 3109–3112.
[36] J.-F. Cardoso, High-order contrasts for independent component analysis, Neural computation 11 (1999) 157–192.
[37] A. Sharma, K. K. Paliwal, Subspace independent component analysis
using vector kurtosis, Pattern Recognition 39 (2006) 2227–2232.
[38] J. Yang, D. Zhang, J.-y. Yang, Is ica significantly better than pca for face
recognition?, in: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer
Vision (ICCV’05) Volume 1, volume 1, IEEE, pp. 198–203.
[39] W. Deng, Y. Liu, J. Hu, J. Guo, The small sample size problem of
ica: A comparative study and analysis, Pattern Recognition 45 (2012)
4438–4450.
[40] J. Stone, J. Porrill, N. Porter, I. Wilkinson, Spatiotemporal independent
component analysis of event-related fmri data using skewed probability
density functions, NeuroImage 15 (2002) 407–421.
[41] T. Kollo, Multivariate skewness and kurtosis measures with an application in ica, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 99 (2008) 2328–2338.
[42] Z. Liu, H. Qiao, Investigation on the skewness for independent component analysis, Science China Information Sciences 54 (2011) 849–860.
[43] J. Karvanen, V. Koivunen, Independent component analysis via optimum combining of kurtosis and skewness-based criteria, Journal of the
Franklin Institute 341 (2004) 401–418.
[44] J. Karvanen, J. Eriksson, V. Koivunen, Pearson system based method
for blind separation, in: Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation
(ICA2000), Helsinki, Finland, pp. 585–590.
[45] J. Karvanen, V. Koivunen, Blind separation methods based on pearson
system and its extensions, Signal Processing 82 (2002) 663–673.
33
[46] A. Stuart, M. G. Kendall, et al., The advanced theory of statistics,
Charles Griffin, 1968.
[47] M. Gaeta, J.-L. Lacoume, et al., Source separation without a priori
knowledge: the maximum likelihood solution, in: Proc. EUSIPCO,
volume 90, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 621–624.
[48] A. Hyvärinen, Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent
component analysis, Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on 10 (1999)
626–634.
[49] A. J. Bell, T. J. Sejnowski, An information-maximization approach to
blind separation and blind deconvolution, Neural computation 7 (1995)
1129–1159.
[50] F. R. Bach, M. I. Jordan, Kernel independent component analysis,
Journal of machine learning research 3 (2002) 1–48.
[51] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The elements of statistical learning 2nd edition, 2009.
[52] F. Harroy, J.-L. Lacoume, Maximum likelihood estimators and cramerrao bounds in source separation, Signal processing 55 (1996) 167–177.
[53] P. Comon, C. Jutten, Handbook of Blind Source Separation: Independent component analysis and applications, Academic press, 2010.
[54] R. J. Samworth, M. Yuan, et al., Independent component analysis via
nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation, The Annals of Statistics
40 (2012) 2973–3002.
[55] V. Zarzoso, J. J. Murillo-Fuentes, R. Boloix-Tortosa, A. K. Nandi, Optimal pairwise fourth-order independent component analysis, Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 54 (2006) 3049–3063.
[56] J. J. Murillo-Fuentes, F. J. González-Serrano, A sinusoidal contrast
function for the blind separation of statistically independent sources,
Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on 52 (2004) 3459–3463.
[57] J.-F. Cardoso, T. Adali, The maximum likelihood approach to complex
ica., in: ICASSP (5), Citeseer, pp. 673–676.
34
[58] J. Gibbons, S. Mylroie, Estimation of impurity profiles in ion-implanted
amorphous targets using joined half-gaussian distributions, Applied
Physics Letters 22 (1973) 568–569.
[59] L. M. Maier, D. E. Anderson, P. L. De Jager, L. S. Wicker, D. A.
Hafler, Allelic variant in ctla4 alters t cell phosphorylation patterns,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (2007) 18607–
18612.
[60] S. Pyne, X. Hu, K. Wang, E. Rossin, T.-I. Lin, L. M. Maier, C. BaecherAllan, G. J. McLachlan, P. Tamayo, D. A. Hafler, et al., Automated
high-dimensional flow cytometric data analysis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (2009) 8519–8524.
[61] A. Clauset, C. R. Shalizi, M. E. Newman, Power-law distributions in
empirical data, SIAM review 51 (2009) 661–703.
[62] A. Azzalini, A class of distributions which includes the normal ones,
Scandinavian journal of statistics (1985) 171–178.
[63] A. Azzalini, A. Dalla Valle, The multivariate skew-normal distribution,
Biometrika 83 (1996) 715–726.
[64] M. Villani, R. Larsson, The multivariate split normal distribution and
asymmetric principal components analysis, Communications in StatisticsTheory and Methods 35 (2006) 1123–1140.
[65] S. John, The three-parameter two-piece normal family of distributions
and its fitting, Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 11
(1982) 879–885.
[66] P.-A. Absil, R. Mahony, R. Sepulchre, Optimization algorithms on matrix manifolds, Princeton University Press, 2009.
[67] C. Khatri, K. Mardia, The von mises-fisher matrix distribution in orientation statistics, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B
(Methodological) (1977) 95–106.
[68] P. Spurek, General split gaussian cross–entropy clustering, Expert Systems with Applications 68 (2017) 58–68.
35
[69] U. Lorenzo-Seva, J. M. Ten Berge, Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a
meaningful index of factor similarity, Methodology 2 (2006) 57–64.
[70] N. E. Helwig, ica: Independent Component Analysis, 2015. R package
version 1.0-1.
[71] J. Karvanen, PearsonICA, 2008. R package version 1.2-3.
[72] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, ProDenICA: Product Density Estimation for
ICA using tilted Gaussian density estimates, 2010. R package version
1.0.
[73] M. Matilainen, J. Miettinen, K. Nordhausen, H. Oja, S. Taskinen, tsBSS:
Tools for Blind Source Separation for Time Series, 2016. R package
version 0.2.
[74] N. E. Helwig, S. Hong, A critique of tensor probabilistic independent component analysis: implications and recommendations for multisubject fmri data analysis, Journal of neuroscience methods 213 (2013)
263–273.
[75] J.-F. Cardoso, A. Souloumiac, Blind beamforming for non-gaussian
signals, in: Radar and Signal Processing, IEE Proceedings F, volume
140, IET, pp. 362–370.
[76] Z. Shi, Z. Jiang, F. Zhou, J. Yin, Blind source separation with nonlinear autocorrelation and non-gaussianity, Journal of computational and
applied mathematics 229 (2009) 240–247.
[77] N. Wang, B. Du, L. Zhang, L. Zhang, An abundance characteristic-based
independent component analysis for hyperspectral unmixing, IEEE
Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53 (2015) 416–428.
[78] C. F. Caiafa, E. Salerno, A. N. Proto, L. Fiumi, Blind spectral unmixing
by local maximization of non-gaussianity, Signal Processing 88 (2008)
50–68.
[79] F. Zhu, Y. Wang, S. X. andBin Fan, C. Pan, Structured sparse method
for hyperspectral unmixing, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing 88 (2014) 101–118.
36
[80] F. Zhu, Y. Wang, B. Fan, G. Meng, S. Xiang, C. Pan, Spectral unmixing
via data-guided sparsity, CoRR abs/1403.3155 (2014).
[81] F. Zhu, Y. Wang, B. Fan, G. Meng, C. Pan, Effective spectral unmixing via robust representation and learning-based sparsity, CoRR
abs/1409.0685 (2014).
37
| 10math.ST
|
Infinitesimal topological generators and quasi
non-archimedean topological groups
arXiv:1505.00415v2 [math.GR] 14 Mar 2016
Tsachik Gelander∗and François Le Maître†
Abstract
We show that connected separable locally compact groups are infinitesimally
finitely generated, meaning that there is an integer n such that every neighborhood
of the identity contains n elements generating a dense subgroup. We generalize a
theorem of Schreier and Ulam by showing that any separable connected compact
group is infinitesimally 2-generated.
Inspired by a result of Kechris, we introduce the notion of a quasi non-archimedean
group. We observe that full groups are quasi non-archimedean, and that every continuous homomorphism from an infinitesimally finitely generated group into a quasi
non-archimedean group is trivial. We prove that a locally compact group is quasi
non-archimedean if and only if it is totally disconnected, and provide various examples which show that the picture is much richer for Polish groups. In particular, we
get an example of a Polish group which is infinitesimally 1-generated but totally disconnected, strengthening Stevens’ negative answer to Problem 160 from the Scottish
book.
1
Introduction
One of the simplest invariants one can come up with for a topological group G is its
topological rank t(G), that is, the minimum number of elements needed to generate a
dense subgroup of G. For this invariant to have a chance to be finite, one needs to assume
that G is separable since every finitely generated group is countable.
The oldest result in this topic is probably due to Kronecker in 1884 [Kro31], and says
that an n-tuple (a1 , ..., an ) of real numbers projects down to a topological generator of
Tn = Rn /Zn if and only if (1, a1 , ..., an ) is Q-linearly independent. Since such n-tuples
always exist, the topological rank of the compact connected abelian group Tn is equal to
one.
Using this result, it is then an amusing exercise to show that t(Rn ) = n+1. This means
that as a topological group, Rn remembers its vector space dimension. In particular, we
see that the topological rank sometimes contains useful information (another somehow
similar instance of this phenomenon was recently discovered by the second-named author
for full groups, see [LM14]).
In order to deal with general connected Lie groups, it is useful to introduce the following definition.
∗
Research supported by the ISF, Moked grant 2095/15.
Research supported by the Interuniversity Attraction Pole DYGEST and Projet ANR-14-CE25-0004
GAMME.
†
1
Definition 1.1. The infinitesimal rank of a topological group G is the minimum n ∈
N ∪ {+∞} such that every neighborhood of the identity in G contains n elements g1 , ..., gn
which generate a dense subgroup of G. We denote it by tI (G).
One can easily show that tI (Rn ) = t(Rn ) = n + 1. This is relevant for the study of
the infinitesimal rank of real Lie groups because if we know that the Lie algebra of a
connected Lie group G is generated (as a Lie algebra) by n elements, then using the fact
fact that tI (R) = 2 we can deduce that tI (G) 6 2n (see the well-known Lemma 4.2).
For various classes of connected Lie groups one can say more. In particular this is the
situation for compact connected Lie groups, in which case a uniform result is useful in view
of the important role of compact groups in the structure theory of locally compact groups.
Auerbach showed that for every compact connected Lie group G, one has tI (G) 6 2
[Aue34]. Moreover, he could show that the set of pairs of topological generators of G has
full measure, which then led Schreier and Ulam to the following general result, for which
we will include a short proof.
Theorem 1.2 (Schreier-Ulam, [SU35]). Let G be a connected compact metrisable group.
Then almost every pair of elements of G generates a dense subgroup of G. In particular,
tI (G) = t(G) = 2 for any non-abelian such G.
Note that there is a vast area between metrizable compact groups and separable ones;
R
for instance (T1 ) is compact separable, but not metrizable. Conversely, being separable
is a minimal assumption for a group to have finite topological rank. Going back to
the n-torus, Kronecker’s result admits a far-reaching generalization due to Halmos and
Samelson, which settles the abelian case.
Theorem 1.3 (Halmos-Samelson, [HS42, Corollary]). The topological rank of every connected separable compact abelian group is equal to one.
Our first result is a generalization of Schreier and Ulam’s Theorem to the separable
compact case. One of the difficulties is that we cannot use their Haar measure argument
anymore.
Theorem 1.4 (see Theorem 3.1). Let G be a separable compact connected group. If G is
non-abelian, then tI (G) = 2, and if G is abelian, then tI (G) = 1.
The fact that the topological rank t(G) = 2 was proved by Hoffmann and Morris
[HM90, Theorem. 4.13]. Note that it follows that tI (G) = t(G) for separable compact
connected group.
It is natural to ask if the following stronger statement is true:
Question 1.5. Let G be a separable compact connected group. Is the set of pairs in G
which topologically generate G necessarily of full measure in G × G?
Say that a topological group is infinitesimally finitely generated if it has finite
infinitesimal rank. Using the previous result, and the solution to Hilbert’s fifth problem,
we establish the following result, which was noted by Schreier and Ulam in the abelian
case (see the last paragraph of [SU35]).
Theorem 1.6 (see Theorem. 4.1). Let G be a separable locally compact group. Then G
is infinitesimally finitely generated if and only if G is connected.
2
Let us now leave the realm of locally compact groups for a moment and discuss the class
of Polish groups, i.e. separable topological groups whose topology admits a compatible
metric. These groups abound in analysis, for instance the unitary group of a separable
Hilbert space or the group of measure-preserving transformations of a standard probability
space are Polish groups. Moreover, they form a robust class of groups, e.g. every countable
product of Polish groups is Polish (see [Gao09] for other properties of this flavour). Recall
that a locally compact group is Polish if and only if it is second-countable.
It is not hard to show that Theorem 1.6 fails for Polish groups: for instance RN is
connected but not topologically finitely generated, in particular it is not infinitesimally
finitely generated. The question of the converse is more interesting, even for the following
weaker property.
Definition 1.7. A topological group G is infinitesimally generated if every neighbourhood of the identity generates G.
Clearly every connected group is infinitesimally generated, and every infinitesimally
finitely generated group is infinitesimally generated. Moreover it follows from van Dantzig’s
theorem that every infinitesimally generated locally compact group is connected.
Question 1.8 (Mazur’s Problem 160 [Mau81]). Must an infinitesimally generated Polish
group be connected?
In [Ste86], Stevens exhibited the first examples of infinitesimally generated Polish
group which are totally disconnected. We show that her examples actually have infinitesimal rank 2 and then provide the following stronger negative answer to Question 1.8.
Theorem 1.9 (see Theorem. 5.15). There exists a Polish group of infinitesimal rank 1
which is totally disconnected.
Let us now introduce the quasi non-archimedean property which is a strong negation
of being infinitesimally finitely generated.
Definition 1.10. A topological group is quasi non-archimedean if for every neighborhood of the identity U in G and every n ∈ N, there exists a neighborhood of the identity
V such that for every g1 , ..., gn ∈ V , the group generated by g1 , ..., gn is contained in U.
Remark. If we switch the quantifiers and ask for a V which works for every n ∈ N, it is
not hard to see that the definition then becomes that of a non-archimedean topological
group (i.e. admitting a basis of neighborhoods of the identity made of open subgroups).
Our inspiration for the above definition comes from the following result of Kechris:
every continuous homomorphism from an infinitesimally finitely generated group into a
full group is trivial (see the paragraph just before Section (E) of Chapter 4 in [Kec10]).
We upgrade this by showing that every full group is quasi non-archimedean, and that any
continuous homomorphism from an infinitesimally finitely generated group into a quasi
non-archimedean group is trivial (see Proposition 5.5). For locally compact groups, we
obtain the following characterisation.
Theorem 1.11 (see Theorem. 5.8). Let G be a separable locally compact group. Then G
is quasi non-archimedean if and only if G is totally disconnected.
3
Note that full groups are connected and at the same time quasi non-archimedean Polish
groups. Moreover, we show that every quasi non-archimedean Polish groups embeds into
a connected quasi non-archimedean Polish group (see Proposition 5.4.).
We also provide examples of totally disconnected Polish groups which are quasi nonarchimedean, but not non-archimedean (see Corollary. 5.12). On the other hand Theorem
1.9 ensures us that there are totally disconnected Polish groups which are not quasi nonarchimedean.
The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2, we prove some basic results on topological generators. In Section 3, we show that separable connected compact groups are
infinitesimally 2-generated. Section 4 is devoted to the proof that every connected separable locally compact group is infinitesimally finitely generated. In Section 5 we introduce
quasi non-archimedean groups and study their basic properties. We also give numerous
examples, and show that a separable locally compact group is totally disconnected if and
only if it is quasi non-archimedean. Finally, a Polish group into which no non-discrete
locally compact group can embed is built in Section 6, where we also ask three questions
raised by this work.
Acknowledgements. We warmly thank Pierre-Emmanuel Caprace for coming up with
the terminology “infinitesimally generated”, as well as for useful conversations around this
topic. We also thank Yves de Cornulier for his helpful remarks on a first version of the
paper.
2
Basic results about topological generators
We collect some results which will serve us in the preceding sections.
Proposition 2.1. Let G be a connected locally compact group. Suppose that K is a
profinite normal subgroup of G such that G/K is infinitesimally finitely generated. Then
tI (G) = tI (G/K). Moreover, if ḡ1 , . . . , ḡk topologically generate the group G/K, and
g1 , . . . , gk are arbitrary respective lifts in G, then g1 , . . . , gk topologically generate G.
The proof of Proposition 2.1 will rely on the following two lemmas:
Lemma 2.2. Let H be a connected locally compact group and f : H ։ L a finite covering
map. Let {l1 , . . . lk } be a topological generating set for L and pick hi ∈ f −1 (li ), i = 1, . . . , k
arbitrarily. Then h1 , . . . , hk topologically generate H.
Proof. Set F = hh1 , . . . , hk i. Note that f , being a finite cover, is a closed map, and hence
f (F ) is closed in L. Since l1 , . . . , lk ∈ f (F ) we have f (F ) = L. Thus Ker f · F = H.
Hence by the Baire category theorem F has a non-empty interior. Since H is connected,
this implies that F = H.
Lemma 2.3. Let G be a (connected) locally compact group admitting a pro-finite normal
subgroup K ⊳G such that L = G/K is a Lie group. Then G is an inverse limit G = lim Lα
←−
of finite (central) extensions Lα of L.
Although the Lemma holds without the assumption that G is connected, since it
significantly simplify the proof while being sufficient for our needs, we will prove it only
under the connectedness assumption.
4
Proof. Given k ∈ K, the image of the orbit map G → K, g 7→ gkg −1 is at the same time
connected, since G is connected and the map is continuous, and totally disconnected as
the image lies in K. It follows that it is constant and k is central. Since k is arbitrary we
deduce that K is central in G. In particular every subgroup of K is normal in G.
Let Kα be a net of open subgroups in K with trivial intersection. Then K = lim K/Kα
←−
and G = lim G/Kα . Set Lα = G/Kα and note that as Kα is open in K, it is of finite
←−
index there. Thus the map Lα → L is a finite covering.
Proof of Proposition 2.1. Let G and K be as in Proposition 2.1. By Lemma 2.3, G =
lim Lα is an inverse limit of finite covers Lα of L = G/K. Let ḡ1 , . . . , ḡk be topological
←−
generators of L, let g1 , . . . , gk be arbitrary lifts in G and denote by giα the projection of gi
in Lα , for every i, α. By Lemma 2.2, hgiα : i = 1, . . . , ki is dense in Lα . That is, the group
hgi : i = 1, . . . , ki projects densely to all Lα . This implies that it is dense in G.
3
Connected compact separable groups are infinitesimally 2-generated
Our aim in this section is to prove the following result. Recall that t(G) is the minimal
number of topological generators of G, while tI (G) is the minimal n ∈ N such that every
neighborhood of the identity contains n elements which topologically generate G.
Theorem 3.1. Let G be a separable compact connected group. Then tI (G) = t(G) = 2 if
G is nonabelian and tI (G) = t(G) = 1 if G is abelian.
3.1
The metrizable case
The case where G is metrizable was proved by Schreier and Ulam [SU35]. Recall that a
compact group is metrizable if and only if it is first countable. In that case one can show
that almost every pair of elements in G (or a single element if G is abelian) topologically
generates G. Let us give a short argument for Theorem 1.2 in that case. First recall
that by the Peter–Weyl theorem, G is an inverse limit of compact Lie groups and, being
first countable, the limit is over a countable net. Since a countable intersection of full
measured sets is of full measure, it is enough to prove the analog statement for compact
connected Lie groups.
Note also that, in complete generality, a subgroup H ≤ G is dense if and only if
• H ∩ G′ is dense in G′ , where G′ is the commutator subgroup in G, and
• HG′ is dense in G.
A connected compact Lie group G is reductive, hence an almost direct product of its
commutator G′ with its centre Z. Moreover G′ is connected and a finite cover of G/Z
which is a semisimple group of adjoint type. In view of Lemma 2.2, we deduce:
Lemma 3.2. Let G be a connected compact Lie group and H ≤ G a subgroup. Then H
is dense in G if and only if both HG′ and HZ(G) are dense in G.
Therefore, for a pair (x, y) ∈ G2 to generate a dense subgroup, it is sufficient if
• the projections of x, y to G/Z generate a dense subgroup in G/Z, and
5
• the projection of x to G/G′ generates a dense subgroup in G/G′ .
It is easy to check that both conditions are satisfied with Haar probability 1 (cf. [Gel08,
Lem. 1.4 and Lem. 1.10]).
3.2
Proof of Theorem 3.1 in the general case
Let us first deal with abelian groups. By the Halmos–Samelson theorem, whenever G is
connected compact separable abelian, one has t(G) = 1. From their result, we deduce the
following consequence.
Lemma 3.3. Let G be a compact connected separable abelian group. Then tI (G) = 1.
Proof. By the Halmos–Samelson theorem, we may and do pick g ∈ G such that hgi is
dense in G. Let U be a neighborhood of the identity in G, and fix n ∈ Z \ {0} such
that g n ∈ U. Then since hg n i has finite index in hgi, its closure hg n i has finite index in
hgi = G. Since G is connected, we must have hg n i = G.
Now suppose that G is any connected compact group. By the Peter–Weil theorem
G = lim Gα is an inverse limit of compact connected Lie groups Gα .
←−
Observe that a surjective map f : G1 ։ G2 between groups always satisfies
f (G′1 ) = G′2 and f (Z(G1 )) ⊂ Z(G2 ),
while for reductive Lie groups we also have f (Z(G1 )) = Z(G2 ). Since every connected
compact Lie group is reductive, hence the product of its centre and its commutator, we
deduce that the same hold for general compact connected groups, i.e.
Z(G) = lim Z(Gα ), G′ = lim G′α and G = Z(G)G′ .
←−
←−
Moreover, since the G′α are semisimple, and in particular perfect, G′ is also perfect,
i.e. G′ = G′′ . It follows that if Γ ≤ G′ is dense, then Γ′ is dense in G′ . Hence we have:
Claim. Suppose that a, b ∈ G′ topologically generate G′ , and h ∈ Z(G) is an element
whose image mod G′ topologically generates G/G′ . Then ah and b topologically generate
G.
Suppose from now on that G is separable. Then every quotient of G is also separable.
Now G/G′ is connected and abelian, so we have tI (G/G′ ) = 1 by Lemma 3.3.
Since Z(G) surjects onto G/G′ , every identity neighbourhood in G contains a central
element h whose image in G/G′ generate a dense subgroup. Thus we are left to show
that tI (G′ ) = 2. The centre of G′ is totally disconnected since it can be written as
Z(G′ ) = lim Z(G′α ), and every G′α has finite center. In view of Proposition 2.1 we may
←−
thus suppose that G′ is center-free. In order to simplify notations, let us suppose below
that G itself is center-free. Note that:
Lemma 3.4. A center-free connected compact group is a direct product of simple Lie
groups.
Q
Thus, G is of the form G = α∈I Sα with Sα being connected adjoint simple Lie group.
Q
Lemma 3.5. The group G = α∈I Sα is separable (if and) only if Card(I) ≤ 2ℵ0 .
6
Let us explain the ‘only if’ side. The other direction will follow once we show that
Card(I) ≤ 2ℵ0 implies that G has a two generated dense subgroup. Suppose by way of
contradiction that Card(I) > 2ℵ0 . Since there are only countably many isomorphism types
of (compact adjoint) simple Lie groups, we deduce that there is some compact simple Lie
group S and a cardinality κ > 2ℵ0 such that G admits a factor isomorphic to S κ . However
by the cardinals version of the pigeon hole principal, if D ⊂ S κ is a countable subset,
there must be two factors S1 , S2 of S κ such that the projection of D to S1 × S2 lies in the
diagonal. In particular, D cannot be dense, confirming the desired contradiction.
Thus, we may suppose below that Card(I) ≤ 2ℵ0 .
Definition 3.6. Let S1 , S2 be two groups, F a set and fi : F → Si , i = 1, 2 two maps.
We shall say that the maps f1 and f2 are isomorphically related if there is an isomorphism
φ : S1 → S2 such that the following diagram is commutative
F
f1
−
→ S1
ց f2 ↓ φ
S2
Q
Q
Lemma 3.7. Let ki=1 Si (k ≥ 2) be a product of simple groups and let R < ki=1 Si be a
proper subgroup that projects onto every Si . Then there are two factors Si , Sj , i 6= j such
that the restrictions of the quotient maps R → Si and R → Sj are isomorphically related.
Q
Proof. For a subset J ⊂ {1, . . . , k} let us denote SJ = i∈J Si and RJ = ProjSJ (R). Let
J ⊂ {1, . . . , k} be a minimal subset such that RJ is a proper subgroup of SJ . By our
assumption J exists and satisfies |J| > 1. We claim that |J| = 2. To see this, we may
reorder the indices so that J = {1, . . . , j} and suppose by way of contradiction that j ≥ 3.
This, together with the minimality of J, implies that for every g ∈ S1 and every 1 < i ≤ j
there is an element in RJ whose first coordinate is g and whose i’th coordinate is 1.
However, multiplying commutators of elements as above, forcing that at each coordinate
1 < i ≤ j at least one of the elements we use is trivial, and using the fact that S1 is
perfect, we deduce that S1 ≤ RJ . In the same way we get that Si ≤ RJ for all i ∈ J
contradicting the assumption that RJ is proper in SJ . Thus J = {1, 2}. Moreover, as Si
is simple and normal, and RJ projects onto Si , while RJ is proper in SJ , it follows that
RJ ∩ Si is trivial, for i = 1, 2. Therefore, the restriction of the projection from RJ to Si
is an isomorphism, for i = 1, 2, hence the maps R → S1 and R → S2 are isomorphically
related.
Assembling
together isomorphic factors of G, we may decompose G as a direct product
Q
G = n∈N Gn where different n’s correspond to non-isomorphic simple Lie factors Sn , and
each Gn is of the form Gn = SnIn with |In | ≤ 2ℵ0 . For x ∈ G we shall denote by xαn , α ∈ In
its corresponding coordinates.
Two elements x, y ∈ G generate a dense subgroup if and only if for any finite
Q set of
indices F = {(ni , αi )} the projections of x and y generate a dense subgroup in F Snαii .
In view of Lemma 3.7 we have:
Corollary 3.8. Two elements x, y ∈ G generate a dense subgroup in G if and only if
• hxαn , ynαi is dense in Snα for every n ∈ N and every α ∈ In , and
• For every n, m ∈ N and α ∈ In , β ∈ Im the (projection) maps {x, y} → Snα , {x, y} →
β
Sm
are not isomorphically related.
7
Thus, in order to prove the theorem, we should explain how to pick (xαn , ynα) arbitrarily
close to the identity in Snα , for every n ∈ N, α ∈ In , which generate a dense subgroup of
Sn , such that for every pair (n, α) 6= (m, β) there is no isomorphism Sn → Sm taking
β
(xαn , ynα ) to (xβm , ym
). Since for n 6= m there is no isomorphism between Sn and Sm we
should only consider the case n = m.
Let S = Sn . Recall that there is an identity neighbourhood (a Zassenhaus neighbourhood) Ω ⊂ S on which the logarithm is well defined, and for x, y ∈ Ω the group hx, yi is
dense in S if log(x) and log(y) generate the Lie algebra Lie(S), (see [Kur49]). Thus we
may pick some open set U1 × U2 ⊂ Ω2 such that for all (x, y) ∈ U1 × U2 the group hx, yi is
dense in S (cf. [GŻuk02]). Furthermore, we may pick U1 , U2 arbitrarily close to the identity. Since Out(S) is finite and S is compact, we may also suppose, by taking U1 and U2
sufficiently small, that for (x, y) ∈ U1 × U2 , if f ∈ Aut(S) satisfies (f (x), f (y)) ∈ U1 × U2 ,
then f is inner. Finally, since the orbit of each (x, y) ∈ U1 × U2 under the action of S
on S × S by conjugation, is dim(S) dimensional, while dim(U1 × U2 ) = 2 dim(S), we can
pick a section S transversal to the orbits foliation, inside U1 × U2 . Clearly the cardinality of that section is 2ℵ0 , hence we may imbed In inside this section. This imbedding
yields a choice of (xα , y α) ∈ S ⊂ U1 × U2 for every α ∈ In , and we have that each pair
(xα , y α ) generates a dense subgroup in S, and no two pairs are isomorphically related.
This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1.
4
Local generators and locally compact connected groups
Recall that a topological group G is infinitesimally finitely generated if tI (G) < +∞,
that is, if there exists n ∈ N such that every neighborhood of the identity contains n
topological generators for G.
Similarly, we say that G is topologically finitely generated if t(G) < ∞, that is,
if G admits a dense finitely generated subgroup.
Last but not least, a topological group is infinitesimally generated if it is generated
by every neighborhood of the identity.
Note that if a group is infinitesimally finitely generated, then it is also topologically
finitely generated and infinitesimally generated. Our main goal in this section is to prove
the following result.
Theorem 4.1. Let G be a separable connected locally compact group. Then G is infinitesimally finitely generated.
As already noted, the separability condition is necessary for a group to be topologically
finitely generated. The connectedness assumption is also necessary (for local generation)
since otherwise G/G◦ , the group of connected components, is non-trivial and by the van
Dantzig’s theorem admits a base of identity neighbourhood consisting of open compact
subgroups. In particular, if O ≤ G/G◦ is a proper open subgroup, its pre-image in G
cannot contain a topological generating set.
Let us start by dealing with the nicest connected locally compact groups: Lie groups.
For these, one can use the Lie algebra to produce topological generators. The following
lemma is well known, but we include a proof for the reader’s convenience.
Lemma 4.2 (Folklore). Let G be a connected Lie group, and let g be its Lie algebra.
Suppose that g is generated as a Lie algebra by X1 , ..., Xn . Then every neighborhood of
8
the identity in G contains 2n elements g1 , ..., g2n which generate a dense subgroup in G.
In particular, G is infinitesimally finitely generated.
Proof. Let V be a neighborhood of the identity in G. Let U be a small enough neighborhood of 0 in g such that exp : U → G is a homeomorphism onto its image, and
exp(U) ⊆ V . Fix 2n elements Y1 , ..., Y2n of U such that for every i ∈ {1, ..., n}, {Y2i , Y2i+1 }
generates a dense subgroup of RXi .
For all i ∈ {1, ..., 2n}, let gi = exp(Yi ), we will show that these elements topologically
generate G. Let H be the closed subgroup generated by the set {gi }2n
i=1 . Note that for
all i ∈ {1, ..., n}, the group H contains exp(RXi ) since the restriction of the exponential
map to RXi is a continuous group homomorphism and RXi is topologically generated by
Y2i and Y2i+1 which are mapped to g2i ∈ H and g2i+1 ∈ H.
Furthermore, H is a Lie group by Cartan’s theorem, and since H contains every
exp(RXi ) the Lie algebra h of H contains every Xi , so h = g. Because G is connected,
we get that G = H.
We deduce from the above lemma that for any connected Lie group, tI (G) 6 2 dim(G).
Better bounds on tI (G) can be deduced from the analysis in [BG03, BGSS06, Gel08].
Let now G be a general connected locally compact group. Recall the celebrated
Gleason-Yamabe theorem (cf. [Kap71, Page 137]):
Theorem 4.3. (Gleason–Yamabe) Let G be a connected locally compact group. Then
there is a compact normal subgroup K ⊳ G such that G/K is a Lie group.
Since G is connected, G/K is a connected Lie group and hence tI (G/K) is finite.
However, K may not be connected.
Example 4.4. (1) (The solenoid) For every n, let Tn be a copy of the circle group
{z ∈ C : |z| = 1}, and whenever m divides n let fn,m : Tn → Tm be the n/m sheeted cover
fn,m (z) = z n/m . Let T = lim Tn be the inverse limit group. Then T is connected, abelian
←−
and locally compact, but admits no connected co-Lie subgroups.
(2) Similarly, as SL2 (R) is homotopic to a circle, we can define, for every n ∈ N, Gn as
the n sheeted cover of SL2 (R). Then whenever m divides n there is a canonical covering
morphisms ψn,m : Gn → Gm , and we may let G be the inverse limit G = lim Gn . Then
←−
G is a connected locally compact group which admits no nontrivial connected compact
normal subgroups.
In order to prove Theorem 4.1, we need one last elementary lemma.
Lemma 4.5. Let G be a topological group and N a normal subgroup. Then tI (G) ≤
tI (N) + tI (G/N). In particular if G/N and N are infinitesimally finitely generated then
so is G.
Proof of Theorem 4.1. Let G be a connected separable locally compact group. Let K ⊳ G
be a compact normal subgroup such that G/K is a Lie group (see Theorem 4.3), and let K ◦
be its identity connected component. Then K ◦ is characteristic in K and therefore normal
in G. Being a closed subgroup of a locally compact separable group, K ◦ is separable
[CI77]. Let H = G/K ◦ and K t = K/K ◦ . By the isomorphism theorem, G/K ∼
= H/K t .
t
Note that K is a pro-finite group, hence by Proposition 2.1 H is infinitesimally finitely
generated. By Theorem 3.1, K ◦ is infinitesimally finitely generated, hence, by Lemma
4.5, G is infinitesimally finitely generated.
9
5
Quasi non-archimedean groups
A topological group is non-archimedean if it has a basis of neighborhoods of the identity
made of open subgroups. Equivalently, every neighborhood of the identity V contains a
smaller neighborhood of the identity U such that the group generated by U is contained in
V , which is the same as requiring that for every n ∈ N and g1 , ..., gn ∈ U, the group generated by g1 , ..., gn is contained in V . The definition that follows is obtained by switching
two quantifiers in the above condition.
Definition 5.1. Say a topological group G is quasi non-archimedean if for all n ∈ N
and all neighborhood of the identity V ⊆ G, there exists a neighborhood of the identity
U ⊆ V such that for all g1 , ..., gn ∈ U, the group generated by g1 , ..., gn is contained in V .
Clearly every non-archimedean group is also quasi non-archimedean. Let us give right
away the motivating example for this definition. We fix a standard probability space
(X, µ), that is, a probability space which is isomorphic to the interval [0, 1] with its Borel
σ-algebra and the Lebesgue-measure.
A Borel bijection T of X is called a non-singular automorphism if for all measurable A ⊆ X, one has µ(A) = 0 if and only if µ(T −1(A)) = 0. The group of all these
automorphisms is denoted by Aut∗ (X, µ), two such automorphisms being identified if they
coincide on a full measure set. We then define the uniform metric du on Aut∗ (X, µ) by:
for all T, U ∈ Aut∗ (X, µ),
du (T, U) = µ({x ∈ X : T (x) 6= U(x)}).
This is a complete metric, though far from being separable (e.g. the group S1 acts freely
on itself, yielding an uncountable discrete subgroup of (Aut∗ (X, µ), du )). But among
closed subgroups of (Aut∗ (X, µ), du ), full groups are separable. Full groups are invariants
of orbit equivalence attached to nonsingular actions of countable groups on (X, µ): given
a non-singular action of a countable group Γ on (X, µ), its full group [RΓ ] is the group of
all T ∈ Aut∗ (X, µ) such that for every x ∈ X, T (x) ∈ Γ · x.
Since every subgroup of a quasi non-archimedean group is quasi non-archimedean
for the induced topology, the following result implies that full groups are quasi nonarchimedean.
Theorem 5.2 (Kechris). Aut∗ (X, µ) is quasi non-archimedean for the uniform metric.
Proof. Define the support of T ∈ Aut∗ (X, µ) to be the set of all x ∈ X such that
T (x) 6= x. Note that du (idX , T ) is precisely the measure of the support of T .
Let ǫ > 0 and n ∈ N, and consider the open ball U := Bdu (idX , ǫ). Suppose that
g1 , ..., gn belong to V := Bdu (idX , ǫ/n), and let A be the reunion of their supports. By
assumption, A has measure less than ǫ. Then the group generated by g1 , ..., gn is contained
in the group of elements supported in A, which is itself a subset of U = Bdu (idX , ǫ).
The following proposition shows that the class of quasi non-archimedean groups satisfies basically the same closure properties as the class of non-archimedean groups.
Proposition 5.3. The class of quasi non-archimedean groups is closed under taking subgroups (with the induced topology), products and quotients.
10
The next proposition highlights the main difference between non-archimedean and
quasi non-archimedean groups. From now on, we will restrict ourselves to the narrower
but well-behaved class of Polish groups, that is, separable groups whose topology admits a compatible complete metric, e.g. full groups for the uniform topology, the group
Aut∗ (X, µ) endowed with the weak topology, or the unitary group of a separable Hilbert
space endowed with the strong operator topology. Let us point out that a locally compact
group is Polish if and only if it is second-countable (see [Kec95, Thm. 5.3]).
Recall that if G is a Polish group and (X, µ) is a standard (non-atomic) probability
space, then the group L0 (X, µ, G) of measurable maps from X to G is a Polish group for
the topology of convergence in measure, two such maps being identified if they coincide
on a full measure set. A basis of neighborhoods of the identity for this topology is given
by the sets
Ũǫ = {f ∈ L0 (X, µ, G) : µ({x ∈ X : f (x) 6∈ U}) < ǫ},
where U is an open neighborhood of the identity in G and ǫ > 0. The Polish group
L0 (X, µ, G) enjoys the two following nice properties (see e.g. [Kec10, Chap. 19]) .
• G embeds into L0 (X, µ, G) via constant maps.
• L0 (X, µ, G) is connected, in fact contractible.
Proposition 5.4. Let G be a quasi non-archimedean Polish group. Then L0 (X, µ, G) is
quasi non-archimedean. In particular any quasi non-archimedean Polish group embeds in
a connected quasi non-archimedean Polish group.
Proof. Let Ũǫ = {f : µ({x ∈ X : f (x) 6∈ U}) < ǫ} be a basic neighborhood of the
identity in L0 (X, µ, G). Let n ∈ N and V be a corresponding neighborhood of the identity
witnessing that G is quasi non-archimedean. Consider the following open neighborhood
of the identity in L0 (X, µ, G):
Ṽǫ/n = {f : µ({x ∈ X : f (x) 6∈ V }) < ǫ/n}.
Then if we let f1 , ..., fn ∈ Ṽǫ,n , the reunion of the sets {x ∈ X : fi (x) 6∈ V } has measure
less than ǫ. By the definition of V and U the group generated by f1 , ..., fn is a subset of
Ũǫ .
Remark. Since non-archimedean groups are totally disconnected, the above proposition
implies there are a lot more quasi non-archimedean groups than the non-archimedean
ones.
The following proposition is inspired by Section (D) of Chapter 4 in [Kec10], where
it is shown that any continuous homomorphism from an infinitesimally finitely generated
group into a full group is trivial.
Proposition 5.5. Any continuous homomorphism from an infinitesimally finitely generated group into a quasi non-archimedean group is trivial.
Proof. Let ϕ : G → H be such a morphism, let V be any neighborhood of the identity
in H, and let n = tI (G). Then there is a neighborhood of the identity U in H such
that any subgroup of H generated by n elements of U is contained in V . Since ϕ is
continuous, ϕ−1 (U) is a neighborhood of the identity in G, and because tI (G) = n we
may find g1 , ..., gn ∈ ϕ−1 (U) which generate a dense subgroup in G. Then the closure of
ϕ(G) coincides with the closure of the group generated by ϕ(g1 ), ..., ϕ(gn ) ∈ U, which by
assumption is contained in V . So ϕ(G) is contained in the closure of any neighborhood
of the identity in H, and since H is Hausdorff this means that ϕ is trivial.
11
Corollary 5.6. The only topological group which is both infinitesimally finitely generated
and quasi non-archimedean is the trivial group.
Corollary 5.7. Every continuous homomorphism from a connected separable locally compact group into (Aut∗ (X, µ), du ) is trivial.
Proof. Since every connected separable locally compact group is infinitesimally finitely
generated by Theorem 4.1 and Aut∗ (X, µ) is quasi non-archimedean by Theorem 5.2, the
previous proposition readily applies.
As a consequence of the previous proposition and Theorem 1.6, we have the following interesting characterizations of connectedness and total disconnectedness for locally
compact separable groups.
Theorem 5.8. Let G be a locally compact separable group. Then the following hold:
(1) G is connected if and only if G is infinitesimally finitely generated.
(2) G is totally disconnected if and only if G is quasi non-archimedean.
Proof. If G is not connected but infinitesimally finitely generated, then G/G0 must also
be infinitesimally finitely generated, which is impossible by van Dantzig’s theorem. The
converse is provided by Theorem 1.6.
If G is totally disconnected, then G is non-archimedean by van Dantzig’s theorem. But
this implies that G is quasi non-archimedean. For the converse, suppose G is quasi nonarchimedean. Then G0 also is, but then by (1) and Proposition 5.5 it must be trivial.
Remark. As was pointed out by Caprace and Cornulier, one can prove (2) more directly.
Indeed, if G0 is non-trivial then it admits a non-trivial one-parameter subgroup which
is in particular infinitesimally 2-generated, contradicting Proposition 5.5. This actually
gives a proof that a locally compact group is quasi non-archimedean if and only if it is
totally disconnected, regardless of its separability.
Let us now give an example of a totally disconnected Polish group which is quasi
non-archimedean, but not non-archimedean. This class of examples was introduced by
Tsankov [Tsa06, Sec. 5], using work of Solecki [Sol99]. We denote by S∞ the group of all
permutations of the integers, equipped with its Polish topology of pointwise convergence.
Recall that every non-archimedean Polish group arises as a closed subgroup of S∞ (see
[BK96, Thm. 1.5.1]). Here, the groups that we will consider are subgroups of S∞ , but
equipped with a Polish topology which refines the topology of pointwise convergence.
Definition 5.9. A lower semi-continuous submeasure on N is a function λ : P(N) →
[0, +∞] such that the following hold:
• λ(∅) = 0;
• for all n ∈ N, we have 0 < λ({n}) < +∞;
• for all A ⊆ B ⊆ N, we have λ(A) 6 λ(B);
• (subadditivity) for all A, B ⊆ N, we have λ(A ∪ B) 6 λ(A) + λ(B);
• (lower semi-continuity)
for every increasing sequence (Ak )k∈N of subsets of N, we
S
have λ( k∈N Ak ) = limk∈N λ(Ak ).
12
We associate to every lower semi-continuous submeasure λ on N a subgroup of S∞ ,
denoted by Sλ , defined by
Sλ = {σ ∈ S∞ : λ(supp σ \ {0, ..., n}) → 0 [n → +∞]},
where supp σ = {n ∈ N : σ(n) 6= n}. Note that since µ({0, ..., n}) < +∞ for every
n ∈ N, the support of every σ ∈ Sλ has finite measure. Also, if λ is actually a measure,
then Sλ = {σ ∈ S∞ : λ(supp σ) < +∞}; furthermore if λ is a probability measure then
Sλ = S∞ .
The group Sλ is equipped with a natural left-invariant metric dλ analogous to the
uniform metric on Aut∗ (X, µ) defined by
dλ (σ, σ ′ ) = λ({n ∈ N : σ(n) 6= σ ′ (n)}).
Note that the condition λ(supp σ \ {0, ..., n}) → 0 ensures that the countable group of
permutations of finite support is dense in Sλ which is thus separable. It is a theorem
of Tsankov that Sλ is actually a Polish group. The following result is a straightforward
adaptation of Theorem 5.2, replacing du by dλ .
Proposition 5.10. Let λ be a lower semi-continuous submeasure on N. Then Sλ is quasi
non-archimedean.
It is easily checked that the topology of Sλ refines the topology induced by S∞ , so
that Sλ is always totally disconnected, and that the open subgroups of Sλ separate points
from the identity (in particular, Sλ is not locally generated). The following example shows
that it can furthermore fail to be non-archimedean. Note that this is just a particular
case of a more general phenomenon: one can actually characterize when the topology fails
to be zero-dimensional1 (see [Tsa06, Thm. 5.3]; the example below is taken from [Mal15,
Cor. 4]).
Example 5.11. Consider the measure λ on N defined by
X1
.
λ(A) =
n
n∈A
Then Sλ is not a non-archimedean group. Indeed, if we fix ǫ > 0 and N ∈ N, we can
find a finite family (Ai )N
i=1 of disjoint subsets of N such that for every i ∈ {1, ..., N},
ǫ
< λ(Ai ) < ǫ. For all i ∈ {1, ..., N}, let σi be a permutation whose support is equal
2
Q
to Ai . Then σ = N
i=1 σi is at distance at least Nǫ/2 from the identity, so that the ball
of radius ǫ around the identity generates a group which contains elements arbitrarily far
away from the identity.
Corollary 5.12. There exists a totally disconnected Polish group which is quasi nonarchimedean, but not non-archimedean.
Let us now give examples of totally disconnected Polish group which are infinitesimally
finitely generated. To do this, we will upgrade a result of Stevens [Ste86] who showed the
existence of totally disconnected infinitesimally generated Polish groups: we will show that
her examples are actually infinitesimally finitely generated. This will be a consequence
of the following general statement, which also implies the well-known fact that R has a
dense Gδ of pairs of topological generators.
1
A topology is zero-dimensional if it has a basis made of clopen sets.
13
Theorem 5.13. Let G be an abelian Polish group which contains the group Z[1/2] of
dyadic rationals as a dense subgroup, and assume furthermore that in the topology induced
by G on Z[1/2], we have 21n → 0 [n → +∞]. Then for every g0 ∈ Z[1/2], the set of h ∈ G
such that hg, hi generate a dense subgroup of G is dense.
In particular there is a dense Gδ set of couples of topological generators of G in G2
and so G is infinitesimally finitely generated with infinitesimal rank at most 2.
Proof. Let g0 ∈ Z[1/2]. In order for a couple (g0 , h) ∈ G2 to generate a dense subgroup
of G, it suffices for the closed subgroup they generate to contain 21n for every n ∈ N, for
2
the group Z[1/2] is dense in G.
T So the set T := {h ∈ G : hg0 , hi = G} may be written as
a countable intersection T = n∈N Tn , where
1
Tn := h ∈ G : n ∈ hg0 , hi .
2
Since G is Polish the set Tn is Gδ , so we only need to show that Tn is dense. To this end,
fix ǫ > 0, n ∈ N, and let h0 ∈ Z[1/2]. We want to find h ∈ Tn such that d(h, h0 ) < ǫ,
where d is a fixed compatible metric on G.
Write g0 = 2km1 and h0 = 2km2 , where k1 , k2 ∈ Z and m ∈ N. We will find β ∈ N such
β
1
that for all N ∈ N, if h = h0 + 2m+N
, then hg0 , hi contains 2N+m
, so that in particular it
1
1
if and only if we can
contains 2n as soon as N + m > n. The group hg0 , hi contains 2N+m
1
find u, v ∈ Z such that ug0 + vh = 2m+N . This condition can be rewritten as
2N k1 u + (2N k2 + β)v = 1.
So we want to find β ∈ N such that for all N ∈ N we have that 2N k1 and 2N k2 + β are
relatively prime. Let us furthermore ask that β is odd, so that we only have to make sure
that every odd prime divisor of k1 does not divide 2N k2 + β.
Let p1 , ..., pk list the odd primes which divide both k1 and k2 , while pk+1, ..., pl are
the odd primes which divide k1 but not k2 . Then it is easily checked that β = (2 +
p1 · · · pk )pk+1 · · · pl works: for all i 6 k we have that β is invertible modulo pi and pi
divides k2 so that 2N k2 + β is not divisible by pi , while for k < i 6 l, β is null modulo pi
while 2N k2 is invertible so that 2N k2 + β is not divisible by pi .
β
1
But then, since 2m+N
tends to zero as N tends to +∞, we also have 2m+N
→ 0
β
[N → +∞]. Then, as explained before, the group generated by g := g0 and h := h0 + 2m+N
1
contains 2m+N , so that (g, h) ∈ Tn , while 0 = d(g, g0) < ǫ and d(h, h0 ) < ǫ if N was chosen
large enough.
So every Tn is a dense subset of G, which ends the proof since this furthermore shows
that the set of couples generating a dense subgroup of G is dense in G2 and this set has
to be a Gδ .
Let us now apply the previous theorem and describe Steven’s examples of Polish groups
which are infinitesimally finitely generated but totally disconnected. These groups arise as
a Polishable subgroups of the real line, constructed by taking a completion of the dyadic
rationals with respect to a well chosen norm which makes 2−n have much bigger norm
than usually.
We fix a biinfinite sequence of positive real number (ri )i∈Z such that ri → 0[i → +∞]
and for all i ∈ Z, we have ri+1 6 ri 6 2ri+1 . Then one can define the following group
14
norm2 k·k on the ring Z[1/2] of dyadic rationals: for every x ∈ Z[1/2],
( n
)
n
X
X
kxk := inf
|ai | ri : x =
ai 2−i , ai ∈ Z, n ∈ N .
i=−n
i=−n
It is easy to check that this defines a group norm on Z[1/2] which refines the usual norm.
Using the fact that ri 6 2ri+1 , one can easily show that for all x ∈ Z[1/2],
( n
)
n
X
X
kxk = inf
|ai | ri : x =
ai 2−i , ai ∈ {−1, 0, 1}, n ∈ N .
i=−n
i=−n
In particular, we see that for all n ∈ N, we have k2−n k = rn so that 2−n → 0 as n → +∞.
Let Z[1/2]
k·k
denote the completion of Z[1/2] with respect to this norm. Since this norm
refines the usual norm, Z[1/2]
k·k
is a subgroup of R. Stevens explicitely described the
k·k
k·k
elements of R belonging to Z[1/2] and showed that the group Z[1/2] is infinitesimally
generated [Ste86, Thm. 2.1 (ii)], and we see that Theorem 5.13 strengthens this because
k·k
it implies that Z[1/2] is infinitesimally 2-generated.
To obtain totally disconnected examples, we need another result of Stevens stating
that the following are equivalent (see [Ste86, Thm. 2.2]):
P
(i)
i∈N ri = +∞,
(ii) k·k is not equivalent to |·| when restricted to Z[1/2],
(iii) Q ∩ Z[1/2]
(iv) Z[1/2]
k·k
k·k
= Z[1/2],
is totally disconnected,
Remark. Note that every subgroup G of R which is not equal to R has to be totally
disconnected for the induced topology, since its complement is dense in R so that the sets
of the form ]r, +∞[ for r ∈ R \ G are clopen in G. In particular, if G is a proper subgroup
of R equipped with a topology which refines the usual topology of R then G is totally
disconnected. So conditions (ii) and condition (iii) clearly imply condition (iv).
P
So suppose further that i∈N ri = +∞ (e.g. take ri = 1 if i 6 0 and ri = 1i otherwise).
k·k
Then we see that Z[1/2] is a totally disconnected Polish group which has infinitesimal
rank at most 2. Moreover since this group is a subgroup of the real line endowed with a
finer topology (see [Ste86, Thm. 2.1]) it cannot be monothetic, so its infinitesimal rank
is actually equal to 2.
Corollary 5.14. There exists a totally disconnected Polish group which has infinitesimal
rank 2, in particular there is a totally disconnected Polish group which is not quasi nonarchimedean.
Remark. Note that one can see directly that Stevens’ groups are not quasi non-archimedean,
even for n = 1. Indeed, if U is a neighborhood of 0 not containing 1, then if V is another
neighborhood of 0 there is some N ∈ N such that 1/2N ∈ V , but the group generated by
1/2N contains 1 hence it is not a subset of U.
2
A norm on an abelian group is a function |·| : G → [0, +∞) such that for any x, y ∈ G, |x + y| 6
|x| + |y|, and |x| = |−x|.
15
We know that while the group of the reals has infinitesimal rank 2, its quotient S1 =
R/Z has infinitesimal rank 1. The same is true of Stevens’ examples, which is going to
yield the following result.
Theorem 5.15. There exists a totally disconnected Polish group which has infinitesimal
rank 1.
Proof. Let G be a totally disconnected Polish group obtained by Stevens’ construction
from a sequence ; then G is a proper subgroup of R containing Z[1/2] as a dense subgroup.
Observe that Z is a discrete subgroup of G and we may thus form the Polish group
G̃ := G/Z.
The group G̃ is a proper dense subgroup of S1 = R/Z, so S1 \ G̃ is thus dense in S1 .
Let A = p([0, 1/2[) where p : R → R/Z is the usual projection, then for all g ∈ S1 \ G̃
the set (g + A) ∩ G̃ is clopen in G̃. Moreover since S1 \ G̃ is dense in S1 the family of sets
((g + A) ∩ G̃)g∈S1 \G̃ separates points in G̃, so G̃ is totally disconnected.
Furthermore, we have by Theorem 5.13 that there is a dense Gδ of h ∈ G such that
the group generated by 1 and h is dense in G. Since 1 ∈ Z and G̃ = G/Z we conclude
that there is a dense Gδ of h ∈ G̃ which generate a dense subgroup in G̃, in particular G̃
has infinitesimal rank 1.
We don’t know an example of a totally disconnected Polish group which is infinitesimally generated and quasi non-archimedean. Moreover, we want to stress out that all
the examples we know of Polish groups which are quasi non-archimedean actually fail
the property even for n = 1, so it would be very interesting to have examples having a
“non-QNA rank” greater than 1.
6
Further remarks and questions
Let us point out how one can easily build Polish groups into which no non-discrete locally
compact group can embed.
Lemma 6.1. Let Γ be a countable discrete group without elements of finite order. Then
every monothetic subgroup of L0 (X, µ, Γ) is infinite discrete. In particular, no nontrivial
compact group embeds into L0 (X, µ, Γ).
Proof. Given 1 6= f ∈ L0 (X, µ, Γ), find A ⊆ X non-null and γ ∈ Γ \ {1} such that f↾A is
constant equal to γ. By assumption, for all n ∈ Z \ {0}, the support of f n contains A,
and so hf i is discrete.
Theorem 6.2. Let Γ be a countable discrete group without elements of finite order, and let
G be a separable locally compact group. Then every continuous morphism G → L0 (X, µ, Γ)
factors through a discrete group.
Proof. Let G0 be the connected component of the identity. Because L0 (X, µ, Γ) is quasi
non-archimedean, π factors through G/G0 by Proposition 5.5 and Theorem 1.6. Then by
van Dantzig’s theorem and the previous lemma, the kernel of the later map contains an
open subgroup of G/G0 , hence it factors through a discrete group.
Question 6.3. Is there a Polish group without any locally compact closed subgroup?
16
The group L0 (X, µ, G) was originally introduced to show that every Polish group
embeds into a connected group, and we saw that being quasi non-archimedean is somehow
opposite to being connected. Because L0 (X, µ, G) can be quasi non-archimedean, one
may ask whether every Polish group embeds into a connected not quasi non-archimedean
group. The isometry group of the Urysohn space answers this question — it is universal
for Polish groups, connected (see [Mel06, Mel10] for stronger versions of these results
as well as background on the Urysohn space) and cannot be quasi non-archimedean by
universality.
However, the same question can be asked replacing not quasi non-archimedean by
infinitesimally finitely generated. It seems to be open wether the isometry group of the
Urysohn space is infinitesimally finitely generated (it is topologically 2-generated by a
result of Solecki, see [Sol05]).
Question 6.4. Is the isometry group of the Urysohn space infinitesimally 2-generated?
Let us end this paper by mentioning a question related to ample generics. A Polish group G has ample generics if the diagonal conjugacy action of G onto Gn has a
comeager orbit for every n ∈ N (see [KR07]). It has been recently discovered that there
exists Polish groups with ample generics which are not non-archimedean (see[KLM15] and
[Mal15]). These examples arise either as full groups or as groups of the form Sλ , which
are quasi non-archimedean groups by Theorem 5.2 and Proposition 5.10. This motivates
the following question.
Question 6.5. Is there a Polish group which has ample generics, but which is not quasi
non-archimedean?
References
[Aue34] H. Auerbach. Sur les groupes linéaires bornés (iii). Studia Mathematica, 5(1):43–
49, 1934.
[BG03] E. Breuillard and T. Gelander. On dense free subgroups of Lie groups. J. Algebra,
261(2):448–467, 2003.
[BGSS06] Emmanuel Breuillard, Tsachik Gelander, Juan Souto, and Peter Storm. Dense
embeddings of surface groups. Geom. Topol., 10:1373–1389, 2006.
[BK96] Howard Becker and Alexander S. Kechris. The descriptive set theory of Polish
group actions, volume 232 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
[CI77]
W. W. Comfort and G. L. Itzkowitz. Density character in topological groups.
Math. Ann., 226(3):223–227, 1977.
[Gao09] Su Gao. Invariant descriptive set theory, volume 293 of Pure and Applied Mathematics (Boca Raton). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2009.
[Gel08] Tsachik Gelander. On deformations of Fn in compact Lie groups. Isr. J. Math.,
167:15–26, 2008.
[GŻuk02] Tsachik Gelander and Andrzej Żuk. Dependence of Kazhdan constants on
generating subsets. Isr. J. Math., 129:93–98, 2002.
17
[HM90] Karl Heinrich Hofmann and Sidney A. Morris. Weight and c. J. Pure Appl.
Algebra, 68(1-2):181–194, 1990. Special issue in honor of B. Banaschewski.
[HS42]
Paul R. Halmos and H. Samelson. On monothetic groups. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.
U. S. A., 28:254–258, 1942.
[Kap71] Irving Kaplansky. Lie algebras and locally compact groups. Chicago Lectures in
Mathematics. 1971.
[Kec95] Alexander S. Kechris. Classical descriptive set theory, volume 156 of Graduate
Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
[Kec10] Alexander S. Kechris. Global aspects of ergodic group actions, volume 160 of
Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.
[KLM15] Adriane Kaïchouh and François Le Maître. Connected Polish groups with ample
generics. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc., 47(6):996–1009, 2015.
[KR07] Alexander S. Kechris and Christian Rosendal. Turbulence, amalgamation, and
generic automorphisms of homogeneous structures. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3),
94(2):302–350, 2007.
[Kro31] Leopold Kronecker. Näherungsweise ganzzahlige Auflösung linearer Gleichungen.
Leopold Kronecker’s Werke. Hrsg. von K. Hensel. Bd. 3. 1. Halbbd. Leipzig :
Druck und Verlag von B.G. Teubner, 1931.
[Kur49] Masatake Kuranishi. Two elements generations on semi-simple Lie groups. Kōdai
Math. Semin. Rep., 1949:89–90, 1949.
[LM14] François Le Maître. The number of topological generators for full groups of
ergodic equivalence relations. Invent. Math., 198:261–268, 2014.
[Mal15] Maciej Malicki. An example of a non non-archimedean polish group with ample
generics. to appear in Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 2015.
[Mau81] R. Daniel Mauldin, editor. The Scottish Book. Birkhäuser, Boston, Mass., 1981.
Mathematics from the Scottish Café, Including selected papers presented at the
Scottish Book Conference held at North Texas State University, Denton, Tex.,
May 1979.
[Mel06] Julien Melleray. Stabilizers of closed sets in the Urysohn space. Fundam. Math.,
189(1):53–60, 2006.
[Mel10] Julien Melleray. Topology of the isometry group of the Urysohn space. Fundam.
Math., 207(3):273–287, 2010.
[Sol99] Sławomir Solecki. Analytic ideals and their applications. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic,
99(1-3):51–72, 1999.
[Sol05] Sławomir Solecki. Extending partial isometries. Israel J. Math., 150:315–331,
2005.
18
[Ste86] T.Christine Stevens. Connectedness of complete metric groups. Colloq. Math.,
50:233–240, 1986.
[SU35]
J. Schreier and Stanisław Ulam. Sur le nombre des générateurs d’un groupe
topologique compact et connexe. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 24(1):302–304,
1935.
[Tsa06] Todor Tsankov. Compactifications of N and Polishable subgroups of S∞ . Fund.
Math., 189(3):269–284, 2006.
19
| 4math.GR
|
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research vol 65:1–58, 2017
Towards Instance Optimal Bounds for Best Arm Identification
arXiv:1608.06031v2 [cs.LG] 24 May 2017
Lijie Chen
Jian Li
Mingda Qiao
CHENLJ 13@ MAILS . TSINGHUA . EDU . CN
LIJIAN 83@ MAIL . TSINGHUA . EDU . CN
QMD 14@ MAILS . TSINGHUA . EDU . CN
Institute for Interdisciplinary Information Sciences (IIIS), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
In the classical best arm identification (Best-1-Arm) problem, we are given n stochastic bandit
arms, each associated with a reward distribution with an unknown mean. Upon each play of an
arm, we can get a reward sampled i.i.d. from its reward distribution. We would like to identify
the arm with the largest mean with probability at least 1 − δ, using as few samples as possible.
The problem has a long history and understanding its sample complexity has attracted significant
attention since the last decade. However, the optimal sample complexity of the problem is still
unknown.
Recently, Chen and Li (2016) made an interesting conjecture, called gap-entropy conjecture,
concerning the instance optimal sample complexity of Best-1-Arm. Given a Best-1-Arm instance
I (i.e., a set of arms), let µ[i] denote the ith largest mean and ∆[i] = µ[1] − µ[i] denote the corPn
−2
responding gap. H(I) =
i=2 ∆[i] denotes the complexity of the instance. The gap-entropy
conjecture states that for any instance I, Ω H(I) · ln δ −1 + Ent(I) is an instance lower bound,
where Ent(I) is an entropy-like term determined
by the gaps, and there is a δ-correct algorithm
for
−1
.
We
note
Best-1-Arm with sample complexity O H(I) · ln δ −1 + Ent(I) + ∆−2
ln
ln
∆
[2]
[2]
−2
−1
that Θ ∆[2] ln ln ∆[2] is necessary and sufficient to solve the two-arm instance with the best
and second best arms. If the conjecture is true, we would have a complete understanding of the
instance-wise sample complexity of Best-1-Arm (up to constant factors).
In this paper, we make significant progress towards a complete resolution of the gap-entropy
conjecture. For the upper bound, we provide a highly nontrivial algorithm which requires
−1
−1
O H(I) · ln δ −1 + Ent(I) + ∆−2
ln
ln
∆
polylog(n,
δ
)
[2]
[2]
samples in expectation for any instance I. For the lower bound, we show that for any Gaussian
Best-1-Arm instance with gaps of the form 2−k , any δ-correct monotone algorithm requires at least
Ω H(I) · ln δ −1 + Ent(I)
samples in expectation. Here, a monotone algorithm is one which uses no more samples (in expectation) on I ′ than on I, if I ′ is a sub-instance of I obtained by removing some sub-optimal
arms.
Keywords: best arm identification, instance optimality, gap-entropy
1. Introduction
The stochastic multi-armed bandit is one of the most popular and well-studied models for capturing the exploration-exploitation tradeoffs in many application domains. There is a huge body
c 2017 L. Chen, J. Li & M. Qiao.
C HEN L I Q IAO
of literature on numerous bandit models from several fields including stochastic control, statistics, operation research, machine learning and theoretical computer science. The basic stochastic
multi-armed bandit model consists of n stochastic arms with unknown distributions. One can adaptively take samples from the arms and make decision depending on the objective. Popular objectives include maximizing the cumulative sum of rewards, or minimizing the cumulative regret (see
e.g., Cesa-Bianchi and Lugosi (2006); Bubeck et al. (2012)).
In this paper, we study another classical multi-armed bandit model, called pure exploration
model, where the decision-maker first performs a pure-exploration phase by sampling from the
arms, and then identifies an optimal (or nearly optimal) arm, which serves as the exploitation
phase. The model is motivated by many application domains such as medical trials Robbins (1985);
Audibert and Bubeck (2010), communication network Audibert and Bubeck (2010), online advertisement Chen et al. (2014), crowdsourcing Zhou et al. (2014); Cao et al. (2015). The best arm
identification problem (Best-1-Arm) is the most basic pure exploration problem in stochastic multiarmed bandits. The problem has a long history (first formulated in Bechhofer (1954)) and has
attracted significant attention since the last decade Audibert and Bubeck (2010); Even-Dar et al.
(2006); Mannor and Tsitsiklis (2004); Jamieson et al. (2014); Karnin et al. (2013); Chen and Li (2015);
Carpentier and Locatelli (2016); Garivier and Kaufmann (2016). Now, we formally define the problem and set up some notations.
Definition 1.1 Best-1-Arm: We are given a set of n arms {A1 , . . . , An }. Arm Ai has a reward
distribution Di with an unknown mean µi ∈ [0, 1]. We assume that all reward distributions are
Gaussian distributions with unit variance. Upon each play of Ai , we get a reward sampled i.i.d.
from Di . Our goal is to identify the arm with the largest mean using as few samples as possible.
We assume here that the largest mean is strictly larger than the second largest (i.e., µ[1] > µ[2] ) to
ensure the uniqueness of the solution, where µ[i] denotes the ith largest mean.
Remark 1.2 Some previous algorithms for Best-1-Arm take a sequence (instead of a set) of n arms
as input. In this case, we may simply assume that the algorithm randomly permutes the sequence at
the beginning. Thus the algorithm will have the same behaviour on two different orderings of the
same set of arms.
Remark 1.3 For the upper bound, everything proved in this paper also holds if the distributions
are 1-sub-Gaussian, which is a standard assumption in the bandit literature. On the lower bound
side, we need to assume that the distributions are from some family parametrized by the means and
satisfy certain properties. See Remark D.4. Otherwise, it is possible to distinguish two distributions
using 1 sample even if their means are very close. We cannot hope for a nontrivial lower bound in
such generality.
The Best-1-Arm problem for Gaussian arms was first formulated in Bechhofer (1954). Most
early works on Best-1-Arm did not analyze the sample complexity of the algorithms (they proved
their algorithms are δ-correct though). The early advances are summarized in the monograph Bechhofer et al.
(1968).
For the past two decades, significant research efforts have been devoted to understanding the optimal sample complexity of the Best-1-Arm problem. On the lower bound
Mannor and Tsitsiklis
Pn side,−2
(2004) proved that any δ-correct algorithm for Best-1-Arm takes Ω( i=2 ∆[i] ln δ−1 ) samples in
expectation. In fact, their result is an instance-wise lower bound (see Definition 1.6). Kaufmann et al.
2
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
P
−1
(2015) also provided an Ω( ni=2 ∆−2
[i] ln δ ) lower bound for Best-1-Arm, which improved the
constant factor in Mannor and Tsitsiklis (2004). Garivier and Kaufmann (2016) focused on the
asymptotic sample complexity of Best-1-Arm as the confidence level δ approaches zero (treating
the gaps as fixed), and obtained a complete resolution of this case (even for the leading constant).1
Chen and
Li (2015) showed that
for each n there exists a Best-1-Arm instance with n arms that
Pn
−2
require Ω
ln
ln
n
samples, which further refines the lower bound.
∆
i=2 [i]
The algorithms for Best-1-Arm have also been significantly improved in the last two decades Even-Dar et al.
(2002); Gabillon et al. (2012); Kalyanakrishnan et al. (2012); Karnin et al. (2013); Jamieson et al.
(2014); Chen and Li (2015); Garivier and Kaufmann (2016). Karnin et al. (2013) obtained an upper
bound of
Xn
−1
−1
.
O
+
ln
δ
ln
ln
∆
∆−2
[i]
[i]
i=2
The same upper bound was obtained by Jamieson et al. (2014) using a UCB-type algorithm called
lil’UCB. Recently, the upper bound was improved to
Xn
−1
−1
−2
−1
+
ln
ln
∆
,
n)
+
ln
δ
ln
ln
min(∆
O ∆−2
∆
[2]
[2]
[i]
[i]
i=2
by Chen and Li (2015). There is still a gap between the best known upper and lower bound.
To understand the sample complexity of Best-1-Arm, it is important to study a special case,
which we term as SIGN-ξ. The problem can be viewed as a special case of Best-1-Arm where there
are only two arms, and we know the mean of one arm. SIGN-ξ will play a very important role in
our lower bound proof.
Definition 1.4 SIGN-ξ: ξ is a fixed constant. We are given a single arm with unknown mean µ 6= ξ.
The goal is to decide whether µ > ξ or µ < ξ. Here, the gap of the problem is defined to be
∆ = |µ − ξ|. Again, we assume that the distribution of the arm is a Gaussian distribution with unit
variance.
In this paper, we are interested in algorithms (either for Best-1-Arm or for SIGN-ξ) that can
identify the correct answer with probability at least 1 − δ. This is often called the fixed confidence
setting in the bandit literature.
Definition 1.5 For any δ ∈ (0, 1), we say that an algorithm A for Best-1-Arm (or SIGN-ξ) is δcorrect, if on any Best-1-Arm (or SIGN-ξ) instance, A returns the correct answer with probability
at least 1 − δ.
1.1. Almost Instance-wise Optimality Conjecture
It is easy to see that no function f (n, δ) (only depending on n and δ) can serve as an upper
bound of the sample complexity of Best-1-Arm (with n arms and confidence level 1 − δ). Instead,
the sample complexity depends on the gaps. Intuitively, the smaller the gaps are, the harder the
instance is (i.e., more samples are required). Since the gaps completely determine an instance (for
Gaussian arms with unit variance, up to shifting), we use ∆[i] ’s as the parameters to measure the
sample complexity.
1. In contrast, our work focus on the situation that both δ and all gaps are variables that tend to zero. In fact, if we let
the gaps (i.e., ∆[i] ’s) tend to 0 while maintaining δ fixed, their lower bound is not tight.
3
C HEN L I Q IAO
Now, we formally define the notion of instance-wise lower bounds and instance optimality.For
algorithm A and instance I, we use TA (I) to denote the expected number of samples taken by A on
instance I.
Definition 1.6 (Instance-wise Lower Bound)
For a Best-1-Arm instance I and a confidence level δ, we define the instance-wise lower bound
of I as
L(I, δ) :=
inf
TA (I).
A:A is δ-correct for Best-1-Arm
We say a Best-1-Arm algorithm A is instance optimal, if it is δ-correct, and for every instance
I, TA (I) = O(L(I, δ)).
Now, we consider the Best-1-Arm problem from the perspective of instance optimality. Unfortunately, even for the two-arm case, no instance optimal algorithm may exist. In fact, Farrell (1964)
showed that for any δ-correct algorithm A for SIGN-ξ, we must have
lim inf
∆→0
TA (I)
= Ω(1).
∆−2 ln ln ∆−1
This implies that any δ-correct algorithm requires ∆−2 ln ln ∆−1 samples in the worst case. Hence,
the upper bound of ∆−2 ln ln ∆−1 for SIGN-ξ is generally not improvable. However, for a particular
SIGN-ξ instance I∆ with gap ∆, there is an δ-correct algorithm that only needs O(∆−2 ln δ−1 )
samples for this instance, implying L(I∆ , δ) = Θ(∆−2 ln δ−1 ). See Chen and Li (2015) for details.
Despite the above fact, Chen and Li (2016) conjectured that the two-arm case is the only obstruction toward an instance optimal algorithm. Moreover, based on some evidence from the previous
work Chen and Li (2015), they provided an explicit formula and conjecture that L(I, δ) can be expressed by the formula. Interestingly, the formula involves an entropy term (similar entropy terms
also appear in Afshani et al. (2009) for completely different problems). In order to state Chen and
Li’s conjecture formally, we define the entropy term first.
Definition 1.7 Given a Best-1-Arm instance I and k ∈ N, let
X
Gk = {i ∈ [2, n] | 2−(k+1) < ∆[i] ≤ 2−k }, Hk =
∆−2
[i] ,
i∈Gk
and
pk = H k /
X
j
Hj .
We can view {pk } as a discrete probability distribution. We define the following quantity as the gap
entropy of instance I:
X
2
Ent(I) =
pk ln p−1
k .
k∈N:Gk 6=∅
Remark 1.8 We choose to partition the arms based on the powers of 2. There is nothing special
about the constant 2, and replacing it by any other constant only changes Ent(I) by a constant
factor.
Conjecture 1.9 (Gap-Entropy Conjecture (Chen and Li, 2016)) There is an algorithm for Best1-Arm with sample complexity
−1
ln
ln
∆
O L(I, δ) + ∆−2
[2] ,
[2]
2. Note that it is exactly the Shannon entropy for the distribution defined by {pk }.
4
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
for any instance I and δ < 0.01. And we say such an algorithm is almost instance-wise optimal for
Best-1-Arm. Moreover,
Xn
−1
L(I, δ) = Θ
.
·
ln
δ
+
Ent(I)
∆−2
[i]
i=2
Remark 1.10 As we mentioned before, the term ∆−2 ln ln ∆−1 is sufficient and necessary for distinguishing the best and the second best arm, even though it is not an instance-optimal bound. The
gap entropy conjecture states that modulo this additive term, we can obtain an instance optimal
algorithm. Hence, the resolution of the conjecture would provide a complete understanding of the
sample complexity of Best-1-Arm (up to constant factors). All the previous bounds for Best-1-Arm
agree with Conjecture 1.9, i.e., existing upper (lower) bounds are no smaller (larger) the conjectured bound. See Chen and Li (2016) for details.
1.2. Our Results
In this paper, we make significant progress toward the resolution of the gap-entropy conjecture.
On the upper bound side, we provide an algorithm that almost matches the conjecture.
Theorem 1.11 There is a δ-correct algorithm for Best-1-Arm with expected sample complexity
Xn
−1
−2
−1
−1
O
·
polylog(n,
δ
)
.
ln
ln
∆
·
ln
δ
+
Ent(I)
+
∆
∆−2
[2]
[2]
i=2 [i]
P
−1 + Ent(I) in Conjecture 1.9. For the
Our algorithm matches the main term ni=2 ∆−2
[i] · ln δ
additive term (which is typically small), we lose a polylog(n, δ−1 ) factor. In particular, for those
instances where the additive term is polylog(n, δ−1 ) times smaller than the main term, our algorithm
is optimal.
On the lower bound side, despite that we are not able to completely solve the lower bound, we
do obtain a rather strong bound. We need to introduce some notations first. We say an instance is
discrete, if the gaps of all the sub-optimal arms are of the form 2−k for some positive integer k.
We say an instance I ′ is a sub-instance of an instance I, if I ′ can be obtained by deleting some
sub-optimal arms from I. Formally, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 1.12 For any discrete instance I, confidence level δ < 0.01, and any δ-correct algorithm
A for Best-1-Arm, there exists a sub-instance I ′ of I such that
Xn
−1
TA (I ′ ) ≥ c ·
,
·
ln
δ
+
Ent(I)
∆−2
[i]
i=2
where c is a universal constant.
We say an algorithm is monotone, if TA (I ′ ) ≤ TA (I) for every I ′ and I such that I ′ is a subinstance of I. Then we immediately have the following corollary.
Corollary 1.13 For any discrete instance I, and confidence level δ < 0.01, for any monotone
δ-correct algorithm A for Best-1-Arm, we have that
Xn
−1
TA (I) ≥ c ·
,
·
ln
δ
+
Ent(I)
∆−2
[i]
i=2
where c is a universal constant.
We remark that all previous algorithms for Best-1-Arm have monotone sample complexity
bounds. The above corollary also implies
P that if an algorithm has amonotone sample complexn
−2
−1 + Ent(I)
on all discrete instances.
ity bound, then the bound must be Ω
i=2 ∆[i] · ln δ
5
C HEN L I Q IAO
2. Related Work
SIGN-ξ and A/B testing. In the A/B testing problem, we are asked to decide which arm between
the two given arms has the larger mean. A/B testing is in fact equivalent to the SIGN-ξ problem.
It is easy to reduce SIGN-ξ to A/B testing by constructing a fictitious arm with mean ξ. For the
other direction, given an instance of A/B testing, we may define an arm as the difference between
the two given arms and the problem reduces to SIGN-ξ where ξ = 0. In particular, our refined
lower bound for SIGN-ξ stated in Lemma 4.1 also holds for A/B testing. Kaufmann et al. (2015);
Garivier and Kaufmann (2016) studied the limiting behavior of the sample complexity of A/B testing as the confidence level δ approaches to zero. In contrast, we focus on the case that both δ and
the gap ∆ tend to zero, so that the complexity term due to not knowing the gap in advance will not
be dominated by the ln δ−1 term.
Best-k-Arm. The Best-k-Arm problem, in which we are required to identify the k arms with the k
largest means, is a natural extension of Best-1-Arm. Best-k-Arm has been extensively studied in the
past few years Kalyanakrishnan and Stone (2010); Gabillon et al. (2011, 2012); Kalyanakrishnan et al.
(2012); Bubeck et al. (2013); Kaufmann and Kalyanakrishnan (2013); Zhou et al. (2014); Kaufmann et al.
(2015); Chen et al. (2017), and most results for Best-k-Arm are generalizations of those for Best-1Arm. As in the case of Best-1-Arm, the sample complexity bounds of Best-k-Arm depend on the
gap parameters of the arms, yet the gap of an arm is typically defined as the distance from its mean
to either µ[k+1] or µ[k] (depending on whether the arm is among the best k arms or not) in the context
of Best-k-Arm problem. The Combinatorial Pure Exploration problem, which further generalizes
the cardinality constraint in Best-k-Arm (i.e., to choose exactly k arms) to general combinatorial
constraints, was also studied Chen et al. (2014, 2016); Gabillon et al. (2016).
PAC learning. The sample complexity of Best-1-Arm and Best-k-Arm in the probably approximately correct (PAC) setting has also been well studied in the past two decades. For Best-1-Arm, the
tight worst-case sample complexity bound was obtained by Even-Dar et al. (2002); Mannor and Tsitsiklis
(2004); Even-Dar et al. (2006). Kalyanakrishnan and Stone (2010); Kalyanakrishnan et al. (2012);
Zhou et al. (2014); Cao et al. (2015) also studied the worst case sample complexity of Best-k-Arm
in the PAC setting.
3. Preliminaries
Throughout the paper, I denotes an instance of Best-1-Arm (i.e., I is a set of arms). The arm
with the largest mean in I is called the optimal arm, while all other arms are sub-optimal. We assume
that every instance has a unique optimal arm. Ai denotes the arm in I with the i-th largest mean,
unless stated otherwise. The mean of an arm A is denoted by µA , and we use µ[i] as a shorthand
notation for µAi (i.e., the i-th largest mean in an instance). Define ∆A = µ[1] − µA as the gap of
arm A, and let ∆[i] = ∆Ai denote the gap of arm Ai . We assume that ∆[2] > 0 to ensure the optimal
arm is unique.
We partition the sub-optimal
arms into different groups based on their gaps. For each k ∈ N,
group Gk is defined as Ai : ∆[i] ∈ 2−(k+1) , 2−k . For brevity, let G≥k and G≤k denoted
S∞
Sk
−2
i=k Gi and
i=1 Gi respectively. The complexity of arm Ai is defined as ∆[i] , while the comPn
plexity of instance I is denoted by H(I) = i=2 ∆−2
[i] (or simply H, if the instance is clear from
P
−2
the context). Moreover, Hk = A∈Gk ∆A denotes the total complexity of the arms in group Gk .
6
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
(Hk )∞
k=1 naturally defines a probability distribution on N, where the probability of k is given by
pk = Hk /H. The gap-entropy of the instance I is then denoted by
X
Ent(I) =
pk ln p−1
k .
k
Here and in the following, we adopt the convention that 0 ln 0−1 = 0.
4. A Sketch of the Lower Bound
4.1. A Comparison with Previous Lower Bound Techniques
We briefly discuss the novelty of our new lower bound technique, and argue why the previous techniques are not sufficient to obtain our result. To obtain a lower bound on the sample
complexity of Best-1-Arm, all the previous work Mannor and Tsitsiklis (2004); Chen et al. (2014);
Kaufmann et al. (2015); Garivier and Kaufmann (2016) are based on creating two similar instances
with different answers, and then applying the change of distribution method (originally developed
in Kaufmann et al. (2015)) to argue that a certain number of samples are necessary to distinguish
such two instances. The idea was further refined by Garivier and Kaufmann (2016). They formulated a max-min game between the algorithm and some instances (with different answers than
the given instance) created by an adversary. The value of the game at equilibrium would be a lower
bound of the samples one requires to distinguish the current instance and several worst adversary instances. However, we notice that even in the two-arm case, one cannot prove the Ω(∆−2 ln ln ∆−1 )
lower bound by considering only one max-min game to distinguish the current instance from other
instance. Roughly speaking, the ln ln ∆−1 factor is due to not knowing the actual gap ∆, and any
lower bound that can bring out the ln ln ∆−1 factor should reflect the union bound paid for the uncertainty of the instance. In fact, for the Best-1-Arm problem with n arms, the gap entropy Ent(I)
term exists for a similar reason (not knowing the gaps). Hence, any lower bound proof for Best1-Arm that can bring out the Ent(I) term necessarily has to consider the uncertainty of current
instance as well (in fact, the random permutation of all arms is the kind of uncertainty we need for
the new lower bound). In our actual lower bound proof, we first obtain a very tight understanding
of the SIGN-ξ problem (Lemma 4.1).3 Then, we provide an elegant reduction from SIGN-ξ to
Best-1-Arm, by embedding the SIGN-ξ problem to a collection of Best-1-Arm instances.
4.2. Proof of Theorem 1.12
Following the approach in Chen and Li (2015), we establish the lower bound by a reduction
from SIGN-ξ to discrete Best-1-Arm instances, together with a more refined lower bound for SIGNξ stated in the following lemma.
Lemma 4.1 Suppose δ ∈ (0, 0.04), m ∈ N and A is a δ-correct algorithm for SIGN-ξ. P is
a probability distribution on {2−1 , 2−2 , . . . , 2−m } defined by P (2−k ) = pk . Ent(P ) denotes the
Shannon entropy of distribution P . Let TA (µ) denote the expected number of samples taken by A
when it runs on an arm with distribution N (µ, 1) and ξ = 0. Define αk = TA (2−k )/4k . Then,
m
X
pk αk = Ω(Ent(P ) + ln δ−1 ).
k=1
3. Farrell’s lower bound Farrell (1964) is not sufficient for our purpose.
7
C HEN L I Q IAO
It is well known that to distinguish the normal distribution N (2−k , 1) from N (−2−k , 1), Ω(4k )
samples are required. Thus, αk = TA (2−k )/4k denotes the ratio between the expected number
of samples taken by A and the corresponding lower bound, which measures the “loss” due to not
knowing the gap in advance. Then Lemma 4.1 can be interpreted as follows: when the gap is drawn
from a distribution P , the expected loss is lower bounded by the sum of the entropy of P and ln δ−1 .
We defer the proof of Lemma 4.1 to Appendix D.
Now we prove Theorem 1.12 by applying Lemma 4.1 and an elegant reduction from SIGN-ξ to
Best-1-Arm.
Proof [Proof of Theorem 1.12] Let c0 be the hidden constant in the big-Ω in Lemma 4.1, i.e.,
m
X
pk αk ≥ c0 · (Ent(P ) + ln δ−1 ).
k=1
We claim that Theorem 1.12 holds for constant c = 0.25c0 .
Suppose towards a contradiction that A is a δ-correct (for some δ < 0.01) algorithm for Best-1Arm and I = {A1 , A2 , . . . , An } is a discrete instance, while for all sub-instance I ′ of I,
TA (I ′ ) < c · H(I)(Ent(I) + ln δ−1 ).
Recall that H(I) and Ent(I) denote the complexity and entropy of instance I, respectively.
Construct a distribution of SIGN-ξ instances. Let nk be the number of arms in I with gap 2−k ,
and m be the greatest integer such that nm > 0. Since I is discrete, the complexity of instance I is
given by
m
X
H(I) =
4k nk .
k=1
−1 −2
−m }. Moreover,
Let pk = 4k nk /H(I). Then (pk )m
k=1 defines a distribution P on {2 , 2 , . . . , 2
the Shannon entropy of distribution P is exactly the entropy of instance I, i.e., Ent(P ) = Ent(I).
Our goal is to construct an algorithm for SIGN-ξ that violates Lemma 4.1 on distribution P .
A family of sub-instances of I. Let U = {k ∈ [m] : nk > 0} be the set of “types” of arms that
are present in I. We consider the following family of instances obtained from I. For S ⊆ U , define
IS as the instance obtained from I by removing exactly one arm of gap 2−k for each k ∈ S. Note
that IS is a sub-instance of I.
Let S denote U \ S, the complement of set S relative to U . For S ⊆ U and k ∈ S, let τkS denote
the expected number of samples taken on all the nk arms with gap 2−k when A runs on IS . Define
αSk = 4−k τkS /nk . We note that 4k αSk is the expected number of samples taken on every arm with
gap 2−k in instance IS .4
We have the following inequality:
XX
XX
X
4k nk αSk =
τkS ≤
TA (IS ) < c · 2|U | H(I)(Ent(I) + ln δ−1 ).
(1)
S⊆U k∈S
S⊆U k∈S
S⊆U
The second step holds because the lefthand side only counts part of the samples taken by A. The
last step follows from our assumption and the fact that IS is a sub-instance of I.
4. Recall that a Best-1-Arm algorithm is defined on a set of arms, so the arms with identical means in the instance
cannot be distinguished by A. See Remark 1.2 for details.
8
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Construct algorithm Anew from A. Now we define an algorithm Anew for SIGN-ξ with ξ = 0.
Given an arm A, we first choose a set S ⊆ U uniformly at random from all subsets of U . Recall that
µ[1] denotes the mean of the optimal arm in I. Anew runs the following four algorithms A1 through
A4 in parallel:
1. Algorithm A1 simulates A on IS ∪ {µ[1] + A}.
2. Algorithm A2 simulates A on IS ∪ {µ[1] + A}.
3. Algorithm A3 simulates A on IS ∪ {µ[1] − A}.
4. Algorithm A4 simulates A on IS ∪ {µ[1] − A}.
More precisely, when one of the four algorithms requires a new sample from µ[1] + A (or µ[1] − A),
we draw a sample x from arm A, feed µ[1] + x to A1 and A2 , and then feed µ[1] − x to A3 and A4 .
Note that the samples taken by the four algorithms are the same up to negation and shifting.
Anew terminates as soon as one of the four algorithms terminates. If one of A1 and A2 identifies
µ[1] + A as the optimal arm, or one of A3 and A4 identifies an arm other than µ[1] − A as the optimal
arm, Anew outputs “µA > 0”; otherwise it outputs “µA < 0”.
Clearly, Anew is correct if all of A1 through A4 are correct, which happens with probability at
least 1 − 4δ. Note that since 4δ < 0.04, the condition of Lemma 4.1 is satisfied.
Upper bound the sample complexity of Anew . The crucial observation is that when µA = −2−k
and k ∈ S, A1 effectively simulates the execution of A on IS\{k} . In fact, since all arms are
Gaussian distributions with unit variance, the arm µ[1] + A is the same as an arm with gap 2−k in
the original Best-1-Arm instance. Recall that the number of samples taken on each of the arms with
S\{k}
. Therefore, the expected number of samples taken on A
gap 2−k in instance IS\{k} is 4k αk
S\{k}
is upper bounded by 4k αk
.5 Likewise, when µA = −2−k and k ∈ S, A2 is equivalent to the
execution of A on IS\{k} , and thus the expected number of samples on A is less than or equal to
S\{k}
4k αk
. Analogous claims hold for the case µA = +2−k and algorithms A3 and A4 as well.
It remains to compute the expected loss of Anew on distribution P and derive a contradiction to
Lemma 4.1. It follows from a simple calculation that
m
X
X
X
X
1
S\{k}
S\{k}
pk αk ≤
αk
pk · |U |
+
αk
2
k=1
k∈U
S⊆U :k∈S
S⊆U :k∈S
=
=
≤
1
2|U |−1
1
2|U |−1
X
X
S\{k}
pk αk
k∈U S⊆U :k∈S
X X 4k nk
· αS
H(I) k
S⊆U k∈S
2|U |
· c · (Ent(I) + ln δ−1 ) < c0 (Ent(P ) + ln(4δ)−1 ).
2|U |−1
5. Recall that if A1 terminates after taking T samples from µ[1] + A, the number of samples taken by Anew on A is also
T (rather than 4T ).
9
C HEN L I Q IAO
The first step follows from our discussion on algorithm Anew . The third step renames the variables
and rearranges the summation. The last line applies (1). This leads to a contradiction to Lemma 4.1
and thus finishes the proof.
5. Warmup: Best-1-Arm with Known Complexity
To illustrate the idea of our algorithm for Best-1-Arm, we consider the following
Pn simplified
yet still non-trivial version of Best-1-Arm: the complexity of the instance, H(I) = i=2 ∆−2
[i] , is
given, yet the means of the arms are still unknown.
5.1. Building Blocks
We introduce some subroutines that are used throughout our algorithm.
Uniform sampling. The first building block is a uniform sampling procedure, Unif-Sampl(S, ε, δ),
which takes 2ε−2 ln(2/δ) samples from each arm in set S. Let µ̂A be the empirical mean of arm A
(i.e., the average of all sampled values from A). It obtains an ε-approximation of the mean of each
arm with probability 1 − δ. The following fact directly follows by the Chernoff bound.
Fact 5.1 Unif-Sampl(S, ε, δ) takes O(|S|ε−2 ln δ−1 ) samples. For each arm A ∈ S, we have
Pr [|µ̂A − µA | ≤ ε] ≥ 1 − δ.
We say that a call to procedure Unif-Sampl(S, ε, δ) returns correctly, if |µ̂A − µA | ≤ ε holds
for every arm A ∈ S. Fact 5.1 implies that when |S| = 1, the probability of returning correctly is at
least 1 − δ.
Median elimination. Even-Dar et al. (2002) introduced the Median Elimination algorithm for the
PAC version of Best-1-Arm. Med-Elim(S, ε, δ) returns an arm in S with mean at most ε away from
the largest mean. Let µ[1] (S) denote the largest mean among all arms in S. The performance
guarantees of Med-Elim is formally stated in the next fact.
Fact 5.2 Med-Elim(S, ε, δ) takes O(|S|ε−2 ln δ−1 ) samples. Let A be the arm returned by Med-Elim.
Then
Pr[µA ≥ µ[1] (S) − ε] ≥ 1 − δ.
We say that Med-Elim(S, ε, δ) returns correctly, if it holds that µA ≥ µ[1] (S) − ε.
Fraction test. Procedure Frac-Test(S, clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , δ) decides whether a sufficiently
large fraction (compared to thresholds θ low and θ high ) of arms in S have small means (compared to
thresholds clow and chigh ). The procedure randomly samples a certain number of arms from S and
estimates their means using Unif-Sampl. Then it compares the fraction of arms with small means
to the thresholds and returns an answer accordingly. The detailed implementation of Frac-Test is
relegated to Appendix A, where we also prove the following fact.
Fact 5.3 Frac-Test(S, clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , δ) takes O (ε−2 ln δ−1 ) · (∆−2 ln ∆−1 ) samples,
where ε = chigh − clow and ∆ = θ high − θ low . With probability 1 − δ, the following two claims hold
simultaneously:
10
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
• If Frac-Test returns True, |{A ∈ S : µA < chigh }| > θ low |S|.
• If Frac-Test returns False, |{A ∈ S : µA < clow }| < θ high |S|.
We say that a call to procedure Frac-Test returns correctly, if both the two claims above hold;
otherwise the call fails.
Elimination. Finally, procedure Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ) eliminates the arms with means
smaller than threshold dlow from S. More precisely, the procedure guarantees that at most a 0.1
fraction of arms in the result have means smaller than dlow . On the other hand, for each arm with
mean greater than dhigh , with high probability it is not eliminated. We postpone the pseudocode of
procedure Elimination and the proof of the following fact to Appendix A.
Fact 5.4 Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ) takes O(|S|ε−2 ln δ−1 ) samples in expectation, where ε =
dhigh − dlow . Let S ′ denote the set returned by Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ). Then with probability
at least 1 − δ/2,
|{A ∈ S ′ : µA < dlow }| ≤ 0.1|S ′ |.
Moreover, for each arm A ∈ S with µA ≥ dhigh , we have
Pr A ∈ S ′ ≥ 1 − δ/2.
We say that a call to Elimination returns correctly if both |{A ∈ S ′ : µA < dlow }| ≤ 0.1|S ′ |
and A1 (S) ∈ S ′ hold; otherwise the call fails. Here A1 (S) denotes the arm with the largest mean
in set S. Fact 5.4 directly implies that procedure Elimination returns correctly with probability at
least 1 − δ.
5.2. Algorithm
Now we present our algorithm for the special case that the complexity of the instance is known
in advance. The Known-Complexity algorithm takes as its input a Best-1-Arm instance I, the
complexity H of the instance, as well as a confidence level δ. The algorithm proceeds in rounds,
and maintains a sequence {Sr } of arm sets, each of which denotes the set of arms that are still
considered as candidate answers at the beginning of round r.
Roughly speaking, the algorithm eliminates the arms with Ω(εr ) gaps at the r-th round, if they
constitute a large fraction of the remaining arms. Here εr = 2−r is the accuracy parameter that we
use in round r. To this end, Known-Complexity first calls procedures Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl
to obtain µ̂ar , which is an estimation of the largest mean among all arms in Sr up to an O(εr ) error.
After that, Frac-Test is called to determine whether a large proportion of arms in Sr have Ω(εr )
gaps. If so, Frac-Test returns True, and then Known-Complexity calls the Elimination procedure
with carefully chosen parameters to remove suboptimal arms from Sr .
The following two lemmas imply that there
algorithm for Best-1-Arm that matches
is a δ-correct
−1
−2
the instance-wise lower bound up to an O ∆[2] ln ln ∆[2] additive term.6
6. Lemma 5.6 only bounds the number of samples conditioning on an event that happens with probability 1 − δ, so
the algorithm may take arbitrarily many samples when the event does not occur. However, Known-Complexity can
be transformed to a δ-correct algorithm with the same (unconditional) sample complexity bound, using the “parallel
simulation” technique in the proof of Theorem 1.11 in Appendix C.
11
C HEN L I Q IAO
Algorithm 1: Known-Complexity(I, H, δ)
Input: Instance I with complexity H and risk δ.
Output: The best arm.
S1 ← I; Ĥ ← 4096H;
for r = 1 to ∞ do
if |Sr | = 1 then return the only arm in Sr ; ;
εr ← 2−r ; δr ← δ/(10r 2 );
ar ← Med-Elim(Sr , 0.125εr , 0.01);
µ̂ar ← Unif-Sampl({ar }, 0.125εr , δr );
if Frac-Test(S
r , µ̂ar −1.75εr , µ̂ar − 1.125εr , 0.3, 0.5, δr ) then
δr′ ← |Sr |ε−2
r /Ĥ δ;
Sr+1 ← Elimination(Sr , µ̂ar − 0.75εr , µ̂ar − 0.625εr , δr′ );
else
Sr+1 ← Sr ;
end
Lemma 5.5 For any Best-1-Arm instance I and δ ∈ (0, 0.01), Known-Complexity(I, H(I), δ)
returns the optimal arm in I with probability at least 1 − δ.
Lemma 5.6 For any Best-1-Arm instance I and δ ∈ (0, 0.01), conditioning on an event that
happens with probability 1 − δ, Known-Complexity(I, H(I), δ) takes
−1
ln
ln
∆
O H(I) · (ln δ−1 + Ent(I)) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
samples in expectation.
5.3. Observations
We state a few key observations on Known-Complexity, which will be used throughout the
analysis. The proofs are exactly identical to those of Observations A.3 through A.5 in Appendix A.
The following observation bounds the value of µ̂ar at round r, assuming the correctness of Unif-Sampl
and Med-Elim.
Observation 5.7 If Unif-Sampl returns correctly at round r, µ̂ar ≤ µ[1] (Sr ) + 0.125εr . Here
µ[1] (Sr ) denotes the largest mean of arms in Sr . If both Unif-Sampl and Med-Elim return correctly,
µ̂ar ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.25εr .
The following two observations bound the thresholds used in Frac-Test and Elimination by applying Observation 5.7.
= µ̂ar − 1.75εr and chigh
= µ̂ar − 1.125εr denote the
Observation 5.8 At round r, let clow
r
r
two thresholds used in Frac-Test. If Unif-Sampl returns correctly, chigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) − εr . If both
r
low
Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl return correctly, cr ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 2εr .
Observation 5.9 Let dlow
= µ̂ar − 0.75εr and dhigh
= µ̂ar − 0.625εr denote the two thresholds
r
r
used in Elimination. If Unif-Sampl returns correctly, dhigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.5εr . If both Med-Elim
r
and Unif-Sampl return correctly, dlow
≥
µ
(S
)
−
ε
.
r
[1] r
r
12
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
5.4. Correctness
We define E as the event that all calls to procedures Unif-Sampl, Frac-Test, and Elimination
return correctly. We will prove in the following that Known-Complexity returns the correct answer
with probability 1 conditioning on E, and Pr [E] ≥ 1 − δ. Note that Lemma 5.5 directly follows
from these two claims.
Event E implies correctness. It suffices to show that conditioning on E, Known-Complexity
never removes the best arm, and the algorithm eventually terminates. Suppose that A1 ∈ Sr .
Observation 5.9 guarantees that at round r, the upper threshold used by Elimination is smaller than
or equal to µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.5εr < µ[1] . By Fact 5.4, the correctness of Elimination guarantees that
A1 ∈ Sr+1 .
It remains to prove that Known-Complexity terminates conditioning on E. Define rmax :=
maxGr 6=∅ r. Suppose r ∗ is the smallest integer greater than rmax such that Med-Elim returns correctly at round r ∗ .7 By Observation 5.9, the lower threshold in Elimination is greater than or equal
to µ[1] − εr∗ . The correctness of Elimination implies that
|Sr∗ +1 |−1 = |Sr∗ +1 ∩G≤rmax | ≤ |Sr∗ +1 ∩G<r∗ | = |{A ∈ Sr∗ +1 : µA < µ[1] −εr∗ }| < 0.1|Sr∗ +1 |.
It follows that |Sr∗ +1 | = 1. Therefore, the algorithm terminates either before or at round r ∗ + 1.
E happens with high probability. We first note that at round r, the probability that either Unif-Sampl
or Frac-Test fails (i.e., returns incorrectly) is at most 2δr . By a union bound, the probability that at
least one call to Unif-Sampl or Frac-Test returns incorrectly is upper bounded by
∞
X
r=1
∞
X
δ
< δ/2.
2δr =
5r 2
r=1
It remains to bound the probability that Elimination fails at some round, yet procedures Unif-Sampl
and Frac-Test are always correct. Define P (r, Sr ) as the probability that, given the value of Sr at
the beginning of round r, at least one call to Elimination returns incorrectly in round r or later,
yet Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test always return correctly. We prove by induction that for any Sr that
contains the optimal arm A1 ,
P (r, Sr ) ≤
δ
Ĥ
where M (r, Sr ) := |Sr ∩ G≤r−2 | and
C(r, Sr ) :=
128C(r, Sr ) + 16M (r, Sr )ε−2
,
r
∞
X
|Sr ∩ Gi |
i+1
X
ε−2
j +
j=r
i=r−1
rmax
X+1
(2)
ε−2
i .
i=r
The details of the induction are postponed to Appendix E.
7. Med-Elim returns correctly with probability at least 0.99 in each round, so r ∗ is well-defined with probability 1.
13
C HEN L I Q IAO
Observe that M (1, I) = 0 and
C(1, I) =
∞
X
|Sr ∩ Gi |
∞
X
rmax
X+1
|Sr ∩ Gi |4i + 4rmax
∞
16 X
≤
3
X
i=0 A∈Sr ∩Gi
Pr [E] ≥ 1 − P (1, S1 ) −
4i
i=1
i=0
Therefore we conclude that
4j +
j=1
i=0
16
≤
3
i+1
X
!
−2
∆−2
≤
A + ∆[2]
32
H(I).
3
δ
2
δ
δ
128C(1, I) + 16M (1, I)ε−2
−
1
2
Ĥ
δ
32H
δ
≥ 1 − 128 ·
·
− ≥ 1 − δ,
4096H
3
2
which completes the proof of correctness. Here the first step applies a union bound. The second
step follows from inequality (2), and the third step plugs in C(1, I) ≤ 32H(I)/3 and Ĥ = 4096H.
≥1−
5.5. Sample Complexity
As in the proof of Lemma 5.5, we define E as the event that all calls to procedures Unif-Sampl,
Frac-Test, and Elimination return correctly. We prove that Known-Complexity takes
−1
ln
ln
∆
O H(I)(ln δ−1 + Ent(I)) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
samples in expectation conditioning on E.
Samples taken by Unif-Sampl and
By Facts 5.1 and 5.3, procedures Unif-Sampl
Frac-Test.
−1
−2
−1
−2
and Frac-Test take O εr ln δr = O εr (ln δ + ln r) samples in total at round r.
In the proof of correctness, we showed that conditioning on E, the algorithm does not terminate
before or at round k (for k ≥ rmax + 1) implies that Med-Elim fails between round rmax + 1 and
round k − 1, which happens with probability at most 0.01k−rmax −1 . Thus for k ≥ rmax + 1, the
expected number of samples taken by Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test at round k is upper bounded by
−1
O 0.01k−rmax −1 · ε−2
(ln
δ
+
ln
k)
.
k
Summing over all k = 1, 2, . . . yields the following upper bound:
rX
max
k=1
−1
ε−2
+ ln k) +
k (ln δ
∞
X
−1
0.01k−rmax −1 · ε−2
+ ln k)
k (ln δ
k=rmax +1
−1
−1
.
ln
δ
+
ln
ln
∆
=O 4rmax (ln δ−1 + ln rmax ) = O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
Here the first step holds since the first summation is dominated by the last term (k = rmax ), while
the second one is dominated by the firstj term (k =
k rmax + 1). The second step follows from the
−1
observation that rmax = maxGr 6=∅ r = log2 ∆[2] .
14
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Samples taken by Med-Elim and Elimination. By Facts 5.2 and 5.4, Med-Elim and Elimination
(if called) take
H
−2
−2
′
−2
−1
O(|Sr |εr ) + O(|Sr |εr ln(1/δr )) = O |Sr |εr
ln δ + ln
|Sr |ε−2
r
samples in total at round r.
We upper bound the number of samples by a charging argument. For each round i, define ri as
the largest integer r such that |G≥r | ≥ 0.5|Si |.8 Then we define
0,
j < ri ,
Ti,j =
H
−2
ln δ−1 + ln
, j ≥ ri
εi
|Gj |εi−2
as the number of samples that each arm in G
Pj is charged at round i.
We prove in Appendix E that for any i, j |Gj |Ti,j is an upper bound on the number of samples
taken by Med-Elim and Elimination at the i-th round. Moreover, the expected number of samples
that each arm in group Gj is charged is upper bounded by
!!
X
H
E[Ti,j ] = O ε−2
.
ln δ−1 + ln
j
|Gj |ε−2
j
i
Note that Hk =
P
A∈Gk
O
X
i,j
−2
∆−2
A = Θ(|Gk |εk ). Therefore, Med-Elim and Elimination take
!
H
−2
|G
|ε
j
j
j
X
H
Hj ln δ−1 + ln
= O
Hj
j
= O H(I) ln δ−1 + Ent(I)
|Gj |E[Ti,j ] = O
X
|Gj |ε−2
j
ln δ−1 + ln
samples in expectation conditioning on E.
In total, algorithm Known-Complexity takes
−1
−1
+ O H(I) ln δ−1 + Ent(I)
ln
δ
+
ln
ln
∆
O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
−1
ln
ln
∆
=O H(I) ln δ−1 + Ent(I) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
samples in expectation conditioning on E. This proves Lemma 5.6.
5.6. Discussion
In the Known-Complexity algorithm, knowing the complexity H in advance is crucial to the
efficient allocation of confidence levels (δr′ ’s) to different calls of Elimination. When H is unknown,
8. Note that |G≥0 | = n − 1 ≥ 0.5|Si | and |G≥r | = 0 < 0.5|Si | for sufficiently large r, so ri is well-defined.
15
C HEN L I Q IAO
our approach is to run an elimination procedure similar to Known-Complexity with a guess of H.
The major difficulty is that when our guess is much smaller than the actual complexity, the total
confidence that we allocate will eventually exceed the total confidence δ. Thus, we cannot assume
in our analysis that all calls to the Elimination procedure are correct. We present our ComplexityGuessing algorithm for the Best-1-Arm problem in Appendix A.
References
Peyman Afshani, Jérémy Barbay, and Timothy M Chan. Instance-optimal geometric algorithms.
In Foundations of Computer Science, 2009. FOCS’09. 50th Annual IEEE Symposium on, pages
129–138. IEEE, 2009.
Jean-Yves Audibert and Sébastien Bubeck. Best arm identification in multi-armed bandits. In
COLT-23th Conference on Learning Theory-2010, pages 13–p, 2010.
Robert E Bechhofer. A single-sample multiple decision procedure for ranking means of normal
populations with known variances. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages 16–39, 1954.
Robert Eric Bechhofer, Jack Kiefer, and Milton Sobel. Sequential identification and ranking procedures: with special reference to Koopman-Darmois populations, volume 3. University of Chicago
Press, 1968.
Sébastien Bubeck, Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, et al. Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multiarmed bandit problems. Foundations and Trends R in Machine Learning, 5(1):1–122, 2012.
Sébastien Bubeck, Tengyao Wang, and Nitin Viswanathan. Multiple identifications in multi-armed
bandits. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 258–265, 2013.
Wei Cao, Jian Li, Yufei Tao, and Zhize Li. On top-k selection in multi-armed bandits and hidden
bipartite graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 1036–1044, 2015.
Alexandra Carpentier and Andrea Locatelli. Tight (lower) bounds for the fixed budget best arm
identification bandit problem. In Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Learning Theory, 2016.
Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi and Gábor Lugosi. Prediction, learning, and games. Cambridge university
press, 2006.
Lijie Chen and Jian Li. On the optimal sample complexity for best arm identification. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1511.03774, 2015.
Lijie Chen and Jian Li. Open problem: Best arm identification: Almost instance-wise optimality and
the gap entropy conjecture. In 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 1643–1646,
2016.
Lijie Chen, Anupam Gupta, and Jian Li. Pure exploration of multi-armed bandit under matroid
constraints. In 29th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, pages 647–669, 2016.
Lijie Chen, Jian Li, and Mingda Qiao. Nearly instance optimal sample complexity bounds for top-k
arm selection. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 101–110, 2017.
16
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Shouyuan Chen, Tian Lin, Irwin King, Michael R Lyu, and Wei Chen. Combinatorial pure exploration of multi-armed bandits. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages
379–387, 2014.
Eyal Even-Dar, Shie Mannor, and Yishay Mansour. Pac bounds for multi-armed bandit and markov
decision processes. In International Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pages 255–
270. Springer, 2002.
Eyal Even-Dar, Shie Mannor, and Yishay Mansour. Action elimination and stopping conditions
for the multi-armed bandit and reinforcement learning problems. Journal of machine learning
research, 7(Jun):1079–1105, 2006.
RH Farrell. Asymptotic behavior of expected sample size in certain one sided tests. The Annals of
Mathematical Statistics, pages 36–72, 1964.
Victor Gabillon, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Alessandro Lazaric, and Sébastien Bubeck. Multibandit best arm identification. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages
2222–2230, 2011.
Victor Gabillon, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, and Alessandro Lazaric. Best arm identification: A
unified approach to fixed budget and fixed confidence. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 3212–3220, 2012.
Victor Gabillon, Alessandro Lazaric, Mohammad Ghavamzadeh, Ronald Ortner, and Peter Bartlett.
Improved learning complexity in combinatorial pure exploration bandits. In Proceedings of the
19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1004–1012, 2016.
Aurélien Garivier and Emilie Kaufmann. Optimal best arm identification with fixed confidence. In
Proceedings of the 29th Conference On Learning Theory (to appear), 2016.
Kevin Jamieson, Matthew Malloy, Robert Nowak, and Sébastien Bubeck. lilucb: An optimal exploration algorithm for multi-armed bandits. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 423–439,
2014.
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan and Peter Stone. Efficient selection of multiple bandit arms: Theory and
practice. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10),
pages 511–518, 2010.
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan, Ambuj Tewari, Peter Auer, and Peter Stone. Pac subset selection in
stochastic multi-armed bandits. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Machine
Learning (ICML-12), pages 655–662, 2012.
Zohar Karnin, Tomer Koren, and Oren Somekh. Almost optimal exploration in multi-armed bandits.
In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-13), pages
1238–1246, 2013.
Emilie Kaufmann and Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan. Information complexity in bandit subset selection. In Conference on Learning Theory, pages 228–251, 2013.
17
C HEN L I Q IAO
Emilie Kaufmann, Olivier Cappé, and Aurélien Garivier. On the complexity of best arm identification in multi-armed bandit models. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2015.
Shie Mannor and John N Tsitsiklis. The sample complexity of exploration in the multi-armed bandit
problem. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 5(Jun):623–648, 2004.
Herbert Robbins. Some aspects of the sequential design of experiments. In Herbert Robbins Selected Papers, pages 169–177. Springer, 1985.
Yuan Zhou, Xi Chen, and Jian Li. Optimal pac multiple arm identification with applications
to crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML-14), pages 217–225, 2014.
18
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Organization of the Appendix
The appendix contains the proofs of our main results. In Section A, we present our algorithm
for Best-1-Arm along with a few useful observations. In Section B and Section C, we prove the
correctness and the sample complexity of our algorithm, thus proving Theorem 1.11. We present
the complete proof of Theorem 1.12 in Section D. Finally, Section E contains the complete proofs
of Lemma 5.5 and Lemma 5.6.
Appendix A. Upper Bound
A.1. Building Blocks
We start by presenting the missing implementation and performance guarantees of our subroutines Frac-Test and Elimination.
Fraction test. Recall that on input (S, clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , δ), procedure Frac-Test decides
whether a sufficiently large fraction (with respect to θ low and θ high ) of arms in S have means smaller
than the thresholds clow and chigh . The pseudocode of Frac-Test is shown below.
Algorithm 2: Frac-Test(S, clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , δ)
Input: An arm set S, thresholds clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , and confidence level δ.
ε ← chigh − clow ; ∆ ← θ high − θ low ;
m ← (∆/6)−2 ln(2/δ); cnt ← 0;
for i = 1 to m do
Pick A ∈ S uniformly at random;
µ̂A ← Unif-Sampl({A}, ε/2, ∆/6);
if µ̂A < (clow + chigh )/2 then
cnt ← cnt + 1;
end
if cnt/m > (θ low + θ high )/2 then
return True;
else
return False;
Now we prove Fact 5.3.
Fact 5.3 (restated) Frac-Test(S, clow , chigh , θ low , θ high , δ) takes O((ε−2 ln δ−1 ) · (∆−2 ln ∆−1 ))
samples, where ε = chigh − clow and ∆ = θ high − θ low . With probability 1 − δ, the following
two claims hold simultaneously:
• If Frac-Test returns True, |{A ∈ S : µA < chigh }| > θ low |S|.
• If Frac-Test returns False, |{A ∈ S : µA < clow }| < θ high |S|.
Proof The first claim directly follows from Fact 5.1 and
m · O(ε−2 ln ∆−1 ) = O((ε−2 ln δ−1 ) · (∆−2 ln ∆−1 )).
It remains to prove the contrapositive of the second claim: |{A ∈ S : µA < clow }| ≥ θ high |S|
implies Frac-Test returns True, and |{A ∈ S : µA < chigh }| ≤ θ low |S| implies Frac-Test returns
False.
19
C HEN L I Q IAO
Suppose |{A ∈ S : µA < clow }| ≥ θ high |S|. Then in each iteration of the for-loop, it holds that
µA < clow with probability at least θ high . Conditioning on µA < clow , by Fact 5.1 we have
µ̂A ≤ µA + ε/2 < clow + ε/2 = (clow + chigh )/2
with probability at least 1 − ∆/6. Thus, the expected increment of counter cnt is lower bounded by
θ high (1 − ∆/6) ≥ θ high − ∆/6.
Thus, cnt/m is the mean of m i.i.d. Bernoulli random variables with means greater than or
equal to θ high − ∆/6. By the Chernoff bound, it holds with probability 1 − δ/2 that
cnt/m ≥ θ high − ∆/6 − ∆/6 > (θ low + θ high )/2.
An analogous argument proves cnt/m < (θ low + θ high )/2 with probability 1 − δ/2, given
|{A ∈ S : µA < chigh }| ≤ θ low |S|. This completes the proof.
Elimination. We implement procedure Elimination by repeatedly calling Frac-Test to determine whether a large fraction of the remaining arms have means smaller than the thresholds. If so,
we uniformly sample the arms, and eliminate those with low empirical means.
Algorithm 3: Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ)
Input: An arm set S, thresholds dlow , dhigh , and confidence level δ.
Output: Arm set after the elimination.
S1 ← S;
dmid ← (dlow + dhigh )/2;
for r = 1 to +∞ do
δr ← δ/(10 · 2r );
if Frac-Test(Sr , dlow , dmid , 0.05, 0.1, δr ) then
high − dmid )/2, δ );
µ̂ ← Unif-Sampl(S
r , (d
r
Sr+1 ← A ∈ Sr : µ̂A > (dmid + dhigh )/2 ;
else
return Sr ;
end
We prove Fact 5.4 in the following.
Fact 5.4 (restated) Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ) takes O(|S|ε−2 ln δ−1 ) samples in expectation,
where ε = dhigh − dlow . Let S ′ be the set returned by Elimination(S, dlow , dhigh , δ). Then we have
Pr[|{A ∈ S ′ : µA < dlow }| ≤ 0.1|S ′ |] ≥ 1 − δ/2.
Moreover, for each arm A ∈ S with µA ≥ dhigh , we have
Pr[A ∈ S ′ ] ≥ 1 − δ/2.
20
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Proof Let ε = dhigh − dlow . To bound the number of samples taken by Elimination, we note
that the number of samples taken in the r-th iteration is dominated by that taken by Unif-Sampl,
O(|Sr |ε−2 ln δr−1 ). It suffices to show that |Sr | decays exponentially (in expectation); a direct
summation over all r proves the sample complexity bound.
We fix a particular round r. Suppose Frac-Test returns correctly (which happens with probability at least 1 − δr ) and the algorithm does not terminate at round r. Then by Fact 5.3, it holds
that
|{A ∈ Sr : µA < dmid }| > 0.05|Sr |.
For each A ∈ Sr with µA < dmid , it holds with probability 1 − δr that
µ̂A < µA + (dhigh − dmid )/2 < dmid + (dhigh − dmid )/2 = (dmid + dhigh )/2.
Note that δr = δ/(10 · 2r ) ≤ 0.1. Thus, at most a 0.1 fraction of arms in {A ∈ Sr : µA < dmid }
would remain in Sr+1 in expectation. It follows that conditioning on the correctness of Frac-Test
at round r, the expectation of |Sr+1 | is upper bounded by
0.05|Sr | · δr + 0.95|Sr | ≤ 0.05|Sr |/10 + 0.95|Sr | = 0.955|Sr |.
Moreover, even if Frac-Test returns incorrectly, which happens with probability at most 0.1, we
still have |Sr+1 | ≤ |Sr |. Therefore,
E[|Sr+1 |] ≤ 0.9 · 0.955E[|Sr |] + 0.1E[|Sr |] < 0.96E[|Sr |].
A simple induction yields E[|Sr |] ≤ 0.96r−1 |S|. Then the sample complexity of Elimination is
upper bounded by
!
∞
∞
X
X
r−1
−1
−2
−1
−2
0.96 (ln δ + r)
E[|Sr |]ε ln δr = O |S|ε
r=1
r=1
= O |S|ε−2 ln δ−1 .
Then we proceed to the proof of the second claim. Let E denote the event that all calls to
procedure Frac-Test returns correctly. By Fact 5.3 and a union bound,
∞
X
Pr [EA ] ≥ 1 −
δr ≥ 1 − δ/2.
r=1
Conditioning on event E, if the algorithm terminates and returns Sr at round r, Fact 5.3 implies that
|{A ∈ Sr : µA < dlow }| < 0.1|Sr |.
This proves the second claim.
Finally, fix an arm A ∈ S with µA > dhigh . Define EA as the event that every call to Frac-Test
returns correctly in the algorithm, and |µ̂A − µA | < (dhigh − dmid )/2 in every round. By Facts
5.1 and 5.3,
∞
X
Pr [EA ] ≥ 1 −
2δr ≥ 1 − δ/2.
r=1
Then in each round r, it holds conditioning on EA that
µ̂A ≥ µA − (dhigh − dmid )/2 > dhigh − (dhigh − dmid )/2 = (dmid + dhigh )/2.
Thus, with probability 1 − δ/2, A is never removed from Sr .
21
C HEN L I Q IAO
A.2. Overview
As shown in Section 5, we can solve Best-1-Arm using
−1
ln
ln
∆
O H · (Ent + ln δ−1 ) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
P
samples, if we know in advance the complexity of the instance, i.e., H = ni=2 ∆−2
[i] .
The value of H is essential for allocating appropriate confidence levels to different calls of
Elimination and achieving the near-optimal sample complexity. When H is unknown, our strategy
is to guess its value. The major difficulty with our approach is that when our guess, Ĥ, is much
smaller than the actual complexity H, the total confidence that we allocate will exceed the total confidence δ. To prevent this from happening, we maintain the total confidence that we have allocated
so far, and terminate the algorithm as soon as the sum exceeds δ.9 After that, we try a guess that is
a hundred times larger. As we will see later, the most challenging part of the analysis is to ensure
that our algorithm does not return an incorrect answer when Ĥ is too small.
We also keep track of the number of samples that have been taken so far. Roughly speaking,
when the number exceeds 100Ĥ , we also terminate the algorithm and try the next guess of Ĥ.
This simplifies the analysis by ensuring that the number of samples we take for each guess grows
exponentially, and thus it suffices to bound the number of samples taken on the last guess.
A.3. Algorithm
Algorithm Entropy-Elimination takes an instance of Best-1-Arm, a confidence δ and a guess
of complexity Ĥt = 100t . It either returns an optimal arm (i.e., “accept” Ĥt ) or reports an error
indicating that the given Ĥt is much smaller than the actual complexity (i.e., “reject” Ĥt ).
Throughout the algorithm, we maintain Sr , Hr and Tr for each round r. Sr denotes the collection of arms that are still under consideration at the beginning of round r. We say that an arm is
removed (or eliminated) at round r, if it is in Sr \ Sr+1 . Roughly speaking, Hr is an estimate of
the total complexity of arms in group G1 , G2 , . . . , Gr . When this quantity exceeds our guess Ĥt ,
Entropy-Elimination directly rejects (i.e., returns an error). Tr is an upper bound on the number of
samples taken by Med-Elim and Elimination10 before round r. As mentioned before, we also terminate the algorithm when Tr exceeds 100Ĥt . Intuitively, this prevents Entropy-Elimination from
taking too many samples on small guesses of H, which gives rise to an inferior sample complexity.
In each round of Entropy-Elimination, we first call Med-Elim to obtain a near-optimal arm ar .
Then we use Unif-Sampl to estimate the mean of ar , denoted by µ̂ar . After that, we call Frac-Test
with appropriate parameters to find out whether a considerable fraction of arms in Sr have gaps
larger than εr . If so, we call procedure Elimination and update the value of Hr+1 accordingly.
Note that we set the thresholds {θr } of Frac-Test such that the intervals [θr−1 , θr ] are disjoint. In
particular, this property is essential for proving Lemma B.6 in the analysis of the correctness of the
algorithm.
Our algorithm for Best-1-Arm guesses the complexity of the instance and invokes EntropyElimination to check whether the guess is reasonable. If Entropy-Elimination reports an error,
9. For ease of analysis, we actually use δ 2 instead of δ in the algorithm.
10. As we will see later, the analysis of the sample complexity of Med-Elim and Elimination are different from the other
two procedures.
22
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Algorithm 4: Entropy-Elimination(I, δ, Ĥt )
Input: Instance I, confidence δ and a guess of complexity Ĥt = 100t .
Output: The best arm, or an error indicating the guess is wrong.
S1 ← I; H1 ← 0; T1 ← 0;
θ0 ← 0.3; c ← log4 100;
for r = 1 to ∞ do
if |Sr | = 1 then
return the only arm in Sr ;
εr ← 2−r ; δr ← δ/(50r 2 t2 );
2
δr′ ← (4|Sr |ε−2
r /Ĥ)δ ;
−1
−2 δ/Ĥ
ln
|S
|ε
;
Tr+1 ← Tr + |Sr |ε−2
r r
t
r
if (Hr + 4|Sr |ε−2
r ≥ Ĥt ) or (Tr+1 ≥ 100Ĥt ) then
return error;
ar ← Med-Elim(Sr , 0.125εr , 0.01);
µ̂ar ← Unif-Sampl({ar }, 0.125εr , δr );
θr ← θr−1 + (ct − r)−2 /10;
if Frac-Test(Sr , µ̂ar − 1.75εr , µ̂ar − 1.125εr , δr , θr−1 , θr ) then
Hr+1 ← Hr + 4|Sr |ε−2
r ;
Sr+1 ← Elimination(Sr , µ̂ar − 0.75εr , µ̂ar − 0.625εr , δr′ );
else
Sr+1 ← Sr ;
Hr+1 ← Hr ;
end
23
C HEN L I Q IAO
we try a guess that is a hundred times larger. Otherwise, we return the arm chosen by EntropyElimination.
Algorithm 5: Complexity-Guessing
Input: Instance I and confidence δ.
Output: The best arm.
for t = 1 to ∞ do
Ĥt ← 100t ;
Call Entropy-Elimination(I, δ, Ĥt );
if Entropy-Elimination does not return an error then
return the arm returned by Entropy-Elimination;
end
A.4. Observations
We start with a few simple observations on Entropy-Elimination that will be used throughout
the analysis.
We first note that Entropy-Elimination lasts O(t) rounds on guess Ĥt , and our definition of θr
ensures that all θr are in [0.3, 0.5].
Observation A.1 The for-loop in Entropy-Elimination(I, δ, Ĥt ) is executed at most ct times,
where c = log4 100.
Proof When r ≥ ct − 1,
ct−1
Hr + 4|Sr |ε−2
= Ĥt .
r ≥4·4
Thus Entropy-Elimination rejects at the if-statement.
Observation A.2 For all t ≥ 1 and 1 ≤ r ≤ ct − 1, 0.3 ≤ θr−1 ≤ θr ≤ 0.5.
Proof Clearly θr ≥ θ0 = 0.3. Moreover,
r
∞
X
1 X −2
−2
(ct − k) /10 ≤ 0.3 +
θr = θ0 +
k ≤ 0.5.
10
k=1
k=1
The following observation bounds the value of µ̂ar at round r, conditioning on the correctness
of Unif-Sampl and Med-Elim.
Observation A.3 If Unif-Sampl returns correctly at round r, µ̂ar ≤ µ[1] (Sr ) + 0.125εr . Here
µ[1] (Sr ) denotes the largest mean of arms in Sr . If both Unif-Sampl and Med-Elim return correctly,
µ̂ar ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.25εr .
24
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Proof By definition, µar ≤ µ[1] (Sr ). When Unif-Sampl({ar }, 0.125εr , δr ) returns correctly, it
holds that
µ̂ar ≤ µar + 0.125εr ≤ µ[1] + 0.125εr .
When both Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl are correct, µar ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.125εr , and thus
µ̂ar ≥ µar − 0.125εr ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.25εr .
The following two observations bound the thresholds used in Frac-Test and Elimination by
applying Observation A.3.
= µ̂ar − 1.75εr and chigh
= µ̂ar − 1.125εr denote the
Observation A.4 At round r, let clow
r
r
two thresholds used in Frac-Test. If Unif-Sampl returns correctly, chigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) − εr . If both
r
low
Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl return correctly, cr ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 2εr .
Proof Observation A.3 implies that when Unif-Sampl is correct,
chigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) + 0.125εr − 1.125εr = µ[1] (Sr ) − εr
r
and when both Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl return correctly,
clow
≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.25εr − 1.75εr = µ[1] (Sr ) − 2εr .
r
Observation A.5 Let dlow
= µ̂ar − 0.75εr and dhigh
= µ̂ar − 0.625εr denote the two thresholds
r
r
used in Elimination. If Unif-Sampl returns correctly, dhigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.5εr . If both Med-Elim
r
low
and Unif-Sampl return correctly, dr ≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − εr .
Proof By the same argument, we have
dhigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) + 0.125εr − 0.625εr = µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.5εr
r
when Unif-Sampl returns correctly, and
dlow
≥ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.25εr − 0.75εr = µ[1] (Sr ) − εr
r
when both Med-Elim and Unif-Sampl are correct.
25
C HEN L I Q IAO
Appendix B. Analysis of Correctness
B.1. Overview
We start with a high-level overview of the proof of our algorithm’s correctness. We first define a
good event on which we condition in the rest of the analysis. Let E1 be the event that in a particular
run of Complexity-Guessing, all calls of procedure Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test return correctly.
Recall that δr , the confidence of Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test, is set to be δ/(50r 2 t2 ) in the r-th
round of iteration t. By a union bound,
Pr[E1 ] ≥ 1 − 2
∞ X
∞
X
δ/(50t2 r 2 ) = 1 − 2δ(π 2 /6)2 /50 ≥ 1 − δ/3.
t=1 r=1
The δ-correctness of our algorithm is guaranteed by the following two lemmas. The first lemma
states that Entropy-Elimination accepts a guess Ĥt and returns correctly with high probability when
Ĥt is sufficiently large. The second lemma guarantees that Entropy-Elimination rejects a guess Ĥt
when Ĥt is significantly smaller than H, the actual complexity. More precisely, we define the
following two thresholds:
tmax = ⌊log100 H⌋ − 2
and
t′max = log100 H(Ent + ln δ−1 )δ−1 + 2.
The precise statements of the two lemmas are shown below.
Lemma B.1 With probability 1 − δ/3 conditioning on event E1 , Complexity-Guessing halts before or at iteration t′max and it never returns a sub-optimal arm between iteration tmax + 1 and
t′max .
Lemma B.2 With probability 1 − δ/3 conditioning on event E1 , Complexity-Guessing never
returns a sub-optimal arm in the first tmax iterations.
Lemma B.1 and Lemma B.2 directly imply the following theorem.
Theorem B.3 Complexity-Guessing is a δ-correct algorithm for Best-1-Arm.
Proof Recall that Pr[E1 ] ≥ 1 − δ/3. It follows directly from Lemma B.1 and Lemma B.2 that
with probability 1 − δ, Entropy-Elimination accepts at least one of Ĥ1 , Ĥ2 , . . . , Ĥt′max . Moreover,
when Entropy-Elimination accepts, it returns the optimal arm. Therefore, Complexity-Guessing
is δ-correct.
B.2. Useful Lemmas
To analyze our algorithm, it is essential to bound the probability that a specific guess Ĥt gets
rejected by Entropy-Elimination. We hope that this probability is high when Ĥt is small (compared
to the true complexity H), while it is reasonably low when Ĥt is large enough.
It turns out to be useful to consider the following procedure P obtained from Entropy-Elimination
by removing the if-statement that checks whether Hr + 4|Sr |ε−2
r ≥ Ĥt and Tr+1 ≥ 100Ĥt . In other
26
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
words, the modified procedure P never rejects, regardless the value of Ĥt . Note that r, the number
of rounds, may exceed ct in P, which leads to invalid values of θr . In this case, we simply assume
that the thresholds used in Frac-Test are 0.3 and 0.5 respectively, and the following analysis still
works. Define random variable H∞ and T∞ to be the final estimation of the complexity and the
number of samples at the end of P. More precisely, if P terminates at round r ∗ , then H∞ and T∞
are defined as Hr∗ and Tr∗ , respectively.
Note that there is a natural mapping from an execution of P to an execution of EntropyElimination. In particular, if both H∞ < Ĥt and T∞ < 100Ĥt hold in an execution of procedure
P, then Entropy-Elimination accepts in the corresponding run. Therefore, we may upper bound the
probability of rejection by establishing upper bounds of H∞ and T∞ . The following two lemmas
bound the expectation of H∞ and T∞ conditioning on the event that Elimination always returns
correctly.
Lemma B.4 E[H∞ |all Elimination return correctly] ≤ 256H.
Lemma B.5 Suppose Ĥt ≥ H. E[T∞ |all Elimination return correctly] ≤ 16(H(Ent + ln δ−1 +
ln(Ĥt /H))).
Note that it is crucial for the two lemmas above that all Elimination are correct. The following
lemma gives an upper bound on the probability that some call of Elimination returns incorrectly.
Lemmas B.4 through B.6 together can be used to upper bound the probability of rejecting a guess
Ĥ. In the statement of Lemma B.6, we abuse the notation a little bit by assuming A1 ∈ G∞ and
∆−2
[1] = +∞.
Lemma B.6 Suppose that s ∈ {2, 3, . . . , n} and r ∗ ∈ N ∪ {∞} satisfy As−1 ∈ Gr∗ . When
Entropy-Elimination runs on parameter Ĥt < ∆−2
[s−1] , the probability that there exists a call of
procedure Elimination that returns incorrectly before round r ∗ is upper bounded by
!
n
X
−2
∆[i] δ2 /Ĥt .
3000s
i=s
The proofs of the three lemmas above are shown below.
Proof [Proof of Lemma B.4] In the following analysis, we always implicitly condition on the event
that all Elimination return correctly. Define H(r, S) as the expectation of H∞ −Hr at the beginning
of the r-th kround of Entropy-Elimination, when the current set of arms is Sr = S. Let rmax denote
j
log2 ∆−1
[2] . Define
C(r, S) =
∞
X
|S ∩ Gi |
i+1
X
ε−2
j +
j=r
i=r−1
rmax
X+1
ε−2
i
i=r
and M (r, S) = |S ∩ G≤r−2 |. We prove by induction on r that
H(r, S) ≤ 128C(r, S) + 16M (r, S)ε−2
r .
(3)
We start with the base case at round rmax + 2. Recall that clow
and dlow
denote the lower
r
r
threshold of Frac-Test and Elimination in round r respectively. For all r ≥ rmax + 2, if Med-Elim
27
C HEN L I Q IAO
returns correctly at round r (which happens with probability 0.99), according to Observation A.4
and Observation A.5, we have
dlow
≥ clow
≥ µ[1] − 2εr ≥ µ[1] − 2−(rmax +1) ≥ µ[2] .
r
r
Since Frac-Test returns correctly (contioning on E1 ) and
|{A ∈ Sr : µA ≤ clow
r }| ≥ |{A ∈ Sr : µA ≤ µ[2] }| = |Sr | − 1 ≥ 0.5|Sr | ≥ θr |Sr |
(the last step applies Observation A.2), Frac-Test must return True and Elimination will be called.
Since we assume that all calls of Elimination return correctly, we have
|Sr+1 | − 1 = |{A ∈ Sr+1 : µA ≤ µ[2] }| ≤ |{A ∈ Sr+1 : µA ≤ dlow
r }| ≤ 0.1|Sr+1 |,
which guarantees that Sr+1 only contains the optimal arm and the algorithm will return correctly in
the next round. Let r0 denote the first round after round rmax + 2 (inclusive) in which Med-Elim
returns correctly. Then according to the discussion above, we have Pr[r0 = r] ≤ 0.01r−rmax −2 for
all r ≥ rmax + 2. Thus it follows from a direct summation on possible values of r0 that
∞
X
H(rmax + 2, S) ≤
≤
≤
r=rmax +2
∞
X
Pr[r0 = r] · 4|S|ε−2
r
r−rmax −2
4|S|ε−2
r 0.01
r=rmax +2
8|S|ε−2
rmax +2
≤ 16M (rmax + 2, S)ε−2
rmax +2 ,
which proves the base case.
Before proving the induction step, we note the following fact: for r = 1, 2, . . . , rmax + 1,
C(r, S) − C(r + 1, S) =
=
∞
X
i=r−1
∞
X
|S ∩ Gi |
i+1
X
ε−2
j −
j=r
−2
|S ∩ Gi |ε−2
r + εr
∞
X
i=r
|S ∩ Gi |
i+1
X
−2
ε−2
j + εr
j=r+1
(4)
i=r−1
= (|S ∩ G≥r−1 | + 1)ε−2
r .
Suppose inequality (3) holds for r + 1. Consider the following three cases of the execution of
Entropy-Elimination in round r. Let Ncur = |S ∩ Gr−1 | and Nbig = |S ∩ G≥r |. For brevity, let
Nsma denote M (r, S) in the following. We have Nsma + Ncur + Nbig = |S| − 1. Note that Sr+1 is
the set of arms that survive round r.
Case 1: Med-Elim returns correctly and Frac-Test returns True.
28
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
According to the induction hypothesis, the expectation of H∞ − Hr in this case can be bounded
by:
H(r + 1, Sr+1 ) + 4|S|ε−2
r
−2
≤128C(r + 1, Sr+1 ) + 16M (r + 1, Sr+1 )ε−2
r+1 + 4|S|εr
−2
≤128C(r + 1, S) + 16[(Nsma + Ncur )/10] · (4ε−2
r ) + 4|S|εr
−2
=128[C(r, S) − (Ncur + Nbig + 1)ε−2
r ] + (6.4Nsma + 6.4Ncur + 4|S|)εr
=128C(r, S) + (10.4Nsma − 117.6Ncur − 124Nbig − 124)ε−2
r
≤128C(r, S) + 10.4Nsma ε−2
r .
Here the third line follows from the fact that Sr+1 ⊆ S and C(r+1, S) is monotone in S. Moreover,
the correctness of the Elimination procedure implies that M (r + 1, Sr+1 ) ≤ (Nsma + Ncur )/10.
The fourth line applies identity (4).
Case 2: Med-Elim returns correctly and Frac-Test returns False.
Since Frac-Test is always correct (conditioning on E1 ) and it returns False, Fact 5.3, Observation A.2 and Observation A.4 together imply Nsma ≤ θr |S| ≤ |S|/2. Thus Nsma ≤ |S| − Nsma =
Ncur + Nbig + 1. As Elimination is not called in this round, the expectation of H∞ − Hr in this
case can be bounded by
H(r + 1, S) ≤128C(r + 1, S) + 16M (r + 1, S)ε−2
r+1
−2
≤128[C(r, S) − (Ncur + Nbig + 1)ε−2
r ] + 64(Nsma + Ncur )εr
=128C(r, S) + (64Nsma − 64Ncur − 128Nbig − 128)ε−2
r ≤ 128C(r, S).
Here the last step follows from 64Nsma −64Ncur −128Nbig −128 ≤ 64(Nsma −Ncur −Nbig −1) ≤ 0.
Case 3: Med-Elim returns incorrectly.
In this case, the worst scenario happens when we add 4|S|ε−2
r to the complexity Hr , but no
arms are eliminated. Then the expectation of H∞ − Hr in this case can be bounded by
H(r + 1, S) + 4|S|ε−2
r
−2
≤128C(r + 1, S) + 16M (r + 1, S)ε−2
r+1 + 4|S|εr
−2
≤128[C(r, S) − (Ncur + Nbig + 1)ε−2
r ] + [64(Nsma + Ncur ) + 4|S|]εr
−2
=128C(r, S) + (68Nsma − 60Ncur − 124Nbig − 124)ε−2
r ≤ 128C(r, S) + 68Nsma εr .
Recall that Case 3 happens with probability at most 0.01. Thus we have:
H(r, S) ≤ 0.01 128C(r, S) + 68M (r, S)ε−2
+ 0.99 128C(r, S) + 10.4M (r, S)ε−2
r
r
≤ 128C(r, S) + 16M (r, S)ε−2
r .
29
C HEN L I Q IAO
The induction is completed. Note that (3) directly implies our bound:
E [H∞ |all Elimination return correctly]
=H(1, S) ≤ 128C(1, S) + 16M (1, S)
i+1
∞
X
X
4j
|S ∩ Gi | ·
=128
j=0
i=0
≤256
∞
X
4i+1 |S ∩ Gi |
i=0
≤256
∞
X
X
∆−2
A = 256H.
i=0 A∈S∩Gi
Then we prove Lemma B.5, which is restated below.
Lemma B.5. (restated) Suppose Ĥt ≥ H. E[T∞ |all Elimination return correctly] ≤ 16(H(Ent +
ln δ−1 + ln(Ĥt /H))).
Proof [Proof of Lemma B.5] Recall that T∞ is the sum of
!
−1
−2
H
|S
|ε
Ĥ
r r
t
ln
= |Sr |ε−2
|Sr |ε−2
δ
+ ln δ−1 + ln
r
r ln
H
|Sr |εr−2
Ĥt
(5)
for all round r. T∞ serves as an upper bound on the expected number of samples taken by Med-Elim
and Elimination (up to a constant factor). Before the technical proof, we discuss the intuition of our
analysis.
In order to bound T∞ , we attribute each term in (5) to a specific subset of arms. For simplicity,
r
we assume for now that this term is just |Sr |ε−2
r = 4 |Sr |. Roughly speaking, we “charge” a cost of
r
−2
εr = 4 to each arm in group G≥r . We expect that |G≥r | is at least a constant times |Sr |, so that
the number of samples (i.e., 4r |Sr |) can be covered by the total charges. Then the analysis reduces
to calculating the total cost that each arm is charged. Fix an arm A ∈ Gr′ for some r ′ . As described
′
above, A is charged 4r in round r (1 ≤ r ≤ r ′ ), and thus the total charge is bounded by 4r , which
is the actual complexity of A.
Now we start the formal proof. Consider the execution of procedure P on Ĥt . We define a
collection of random variables {Ti,j : i, j ≥ 1}, where Ti,j corresponds to the cost we charge each
arm in Gj at round i. For each i, let ri denote the largest integer such that |G≥ri | ≥ 0.5|Si |. Note
that such an ri always exists, as |G≥1 | = |S1 | ≥ 0.5|Si | and |G≥r | = 0 for sufficiently large r. We
define Ti,j as
0,
j < ri ,
Ti,j =
−2
Ĥ
H
−1
t
εi
ln |G |ε−2 + ln δ + ln H , j ≥ ri .
j
i
Note that this slightly differs from the proof idea described above: Ti,j might be positive when
i > j (i.e., we may not always charge G≥i in round i). In fact, the charging argument described
30
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
in the proof idea works only if, ideally, all calls of Med-Elim are correct. Since actually some
Med-Elim may return incorrectly, we have to slightly modify the charging method. Nevertheless,
we will show that this difference only incurs a reasonably small cost in expectation.
We first claim that
X
T∞ ≤ 2
|Gj | · Ti,j .
(6)
i,j
In other words, the total costh we charge is indeed an upper bound on Ti∞ . Note that the contribution
−1 + ln(Ĥ /H) , while its contribution to the
ln(H/(|Sr |ε−2
of round i to T∞ is |Si |ε−2
t
r )) + ln δ
i
right-hand side of (6) is
X
X
−2
−1
))
+
ln
δ
+
ln(
Ĥ
/H)
ln(H/(|G
|ε
2
|Gj | · Ti,j = 2
|Gj | · ε−2
t
j
i
i
j
j
h
i
−2
−1
ln(H/(|S
|ε
))
+
ln
δ
+
ln(
Ĥ
/H)
≥ 2|G≥ri | · ε−2
r
t
r
i
h
i
−2
−1
ln(H/(|S
|ε
))
+
ln
δ
+
ln(
Ĥ
/H)
.
≥ |Si |ε−2
r
t
r
i
Then identity (6) directly follows from a summation on i.
Then we bound the expectation of each Ti,j . When i ≤ j, we have the trivial bound
!
Ĥt
H
−1
−2
.
+ ln δ + ln
ln
E[Ti,j ] ≤ εi
H
|Gj |ε−2
i
When i > j, we bound the probability that Ti,j > 0. By definition, Ti,j > 0 if and only if ri ≤ j,
where ri is the largest integer that satisfies |G≥ri | ≥ 0.5|Si |. It follows that Ti,j > 0 only if
|G≥j+1 | < 0.5|Si |.
Observe that in order to have |G≥j+1 | < 0.5|Si |, Med-Elim must return incorrectly between
round j + 1 and round i − 1. In fact, suppose towards a contradiction that Med-Elim is correct in
round k ∈ [j + 1, i − 1]. Then we have
|G≥j+1 | ≥ |G≥k | ≥ |Sk+1 ∩ G≥k | > 0.5|Sk+1 | ≥ 0.5|Si |,
a contradiction. Here the third step is due to the fact that when Elimination returns correctly at
round k, the fraction of arms in Sk+1 with gap greater than 2−k is less than 0.1.
Note that for each specific round, the probability that Med-Elim returns incorrectly is at most
0.01. Thus, the probability that Ti,j > 0 for i > j is upper bounded by 0.01i−j−1 . Therefore,
!
Ĥt
H
−1
i−j−1 −2
+ ln δ + ln
.
E[Ti,j ] ≤ 0.01
εi
ln
H
|Gj |εi−2
It remains to sum up the upper bounds of E[Ti,j ] to yield our bound of E[T∞ ].
X
X
X
|Gj | · E[Ti,j ] = 2
|Gj | · E[Ti,j ] + 2
|Gj | · E[Ti,j ].
E[T∞ ] ≤ 2
i,j
i≤j
31
i>j
C HEN L I Q IAO
Here the first part can be bounded by
2
X
i≤j
j
XX
Ĥt
H
+ ln δ−1 + ln
|Gj | · E[Ti,j ] ≤ 2
|Gj | · 4 ln
i
|Gj |4
H
j i=1
!
X
Ĥt
H
+ ln δ−1 + ln
≤4
|Gj | · 4j ln
j
|Gj |4
H
j
!
X
H
Ĥ
t
≤4
Hj ln
+ Hj ln δ−1 + Hj ln
Hj /4
H
j
!
Ĥt
.
≤ 8H Ent + ln δ−1 + ln
H
i
!
The second part can be bounded similarly.
2
X
i>j
∞
X X
H
Ĥt
|Gj | · E[Ti,j ] ≤ 2
0.01
|Gj | · 4 ln
+ ln δ−1 + ln
i
|Gj |4
H
j i=j+1
!
X
H
Ĥt
≤4
|Gj | · 4j ln
+ ln δ−1 + ln
j
|Gj |4
H
j
!
X
Ĥ
H
t
+ Hj ln δ−1 + Hj ln
≤4
Hj ln
Hj /4
H
j
!
Ĥt
.
≤ 8H Ent + ln δ−1 + ln
H
i−j−1
i
!
In fact, the crucial observation for both the two inequalities above is that the summation decreases
exponentially as i becomes farther away from j. The lemma directly follows.
Finally, we prove Lemma B.6, which is restated below. Recall that we abuse the notation a little
bit by assuming A1 ∈ G∞ and ∆−2
[1] = +∞.
Lemma B.6. (restated) Suppose that s ∈ {2, 3, . . . , n} and r ∗ ∈ N ∪ {∞} satisfy As−1 ∈ Gr∗ .
When Entropy-Elimination runs on parameter Ĥt < ∆−2
[s−1] , the probability that there exists a call
of procedure Elimination that returns incorrectly before round r ∗ is upper bounded by
!
n
X
δ2 /Ĥt .
∆−2
3000s
[i]
i=s
Proof [Proof of Lemma B.6] Recall that As−1 ∈ Gr∗ . Suppose As ∈ Gr′ . Suppose that we are at
the beginning of round r of Entropy-Elimination and the subset of arms that have not been removed
is Sr = S. Moreover, we assume that the optimal arm, A1 , is still in Sr . Let P (r, S) denote the
probability that some call of procedure Elimination returns incorrectly in round r, r + 1, . . . , r ∗ − 1.
32
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
As in the proof of Lemma B.4, we bound P (r, S) by induction using the potential function
method. Define
′ +2
rX
i+1
r′
X
X
−2
ε−2
εj + (s − 1)
|S ∩ Gi |
C(r, S) =
j
j=r
j=r
i=r−1
and M (r, S) = |S ∩ G≤r−2 |. Then it holds that for 1 ≤ r ≤ r ′ + 1,
′
C(r, S) − C(r + 1, S) =
r
X
−2
−2
|S ∩ Gi |ε−2
r + (s − 1)εr ≥ (|S ∩ G≥r−1 | + 1)εr .
i=r−1
We prove by induction that
2
P (r, S) ≤ 128C(r, S) + 16M (r, S)ε−2
δ /Ĥ.
r
(7)
We first prove the base case at round r ′ + 2. If r ′ + 2 ≥ r ∗ , the bound holds trivially. Otherwise,
we consider the ratio
α = |Sr′ +2 ∩ {As , As+1 , . . . , An }|/|Sr′ +2 |,
which is the fraction of arms at round r ′ + 2 that are strictly worse than As−1 . Let r0 be the first
round after r ′ + 2 (inclusive) in which Med-Elim returns correctly. If Frac-Test returns False in
round r0 , according to Fact 5.3 and the correctness of Frac-Test conditioning on event E1 , we have
α ≤ θr0 . Consequently, in each of the following rounds (say, round r > r0 ), Frac-Test always
returns False since α ≤ θr0 ≤ θr−1 , and Elimination will never be called before round r ∗ . Note
that it is crucial that the threshold interval of Frac-Test in diffrent rounds are disjoint. For the
other case, suppose Frac-Test returns True and we call Elimination in round r0 . Then after that,
assuming Elimination returns correctly, the fraction of arms worse than As−1 will be smaller than
0.1. It also follows that Elimination will never be called after round r0 . Therefore, Elimination is
called at most once between round r ′ + 2 and r ∗ − 1, and it can only be called at round r0 . Note that
′
for r ≥ r ′ + 2, Pr[r0 = r] ≤ 0.01r−r −2 . A direct summation on all possible values of r0 yields
′
P (r + 2, S) ≤
∗ −1
rX
Pr[r0 = r] · δr′
r=r ′ +2
=
∗ −1
rX
′
2
0.01r−r −2 · 4|S|ε−2
r δ /Ĥ
r=r ′ +2
∞
X
2
≤ 4|S|ε−2
δ
/
Ĥ
0.01k 4k
′
r +2
k=0
≤
2
5|S|ε−2
r ′ +2 δ /Ĥ.
′
′
′
Note that C(r ′ +2, S) = (s−1)ε−2
r ′ +2 , M (r +2, S) = |S ∩G≤r | and |S| ≤ |S ∩G≤r |+(s−1).
Thus
2
P (r ′ + 2, S) ≤ 5(|S ∩ G≤r′ | + s − 1)ε−2
r ′ +2 δ /Ĥ
which proves the base case.
2
≤ 128C(r ′ + 2, S) + 16M (r ′ + 2, S)ε−2
′
r +2 δ /Ĥ,
33
C HEN L I Q IAO
Then we proceed to the induction step. Again, we consider whether Med-Elim returns correctly
and whether Frac-Test returns True. Let Ncur = |S ∩ Gr−1 | and Nbig = |S ∩ G≥r |. Again, we
denote M (r, S) by Nsma for brevity. Note that Sr+1 is the set of arms that survive round r.
Case 1: Med-Elim returns correctly and Frac-Test returns True.
In this case, Elimination is called with confidence level δr′ . Then the conditional probability
that some Elimination returns incorrectly in this case is bounded by
P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) + δr′
2
−2
≤ 128C(r + 1, Sr+1 ) + 16M (r + 1, Sr+1 )ε−2
δ /Ĥ
r+1 + 4|S|εr
−2
≤ 128C(r + 1, S) + 64(Nsma + Ncur )ε−2
δ2 /Ĥ
r /10 + 4|S|εr
2
−2
= 128C(r, S) − 128(Ncur + Nbig + s − 1)ε−2
δ /Ĥ
r + (6.4Nsma + 6.4Ncur + 4|S|)εr
≤[128C(r, S) + 10.4M (r, S)εr−2 ]δ2 /Ĥ.
Case 2: Med-Elim returns correctly and Frac-Test returns False.
Since Frac-Test returns False, according to Fact 5.3 and Observation A.4, we have Nsma ≤
|S| − Nsma = Ncur + Nbig + 1. Then the conditional probability in this case is bounded by
2
P (r + 1, S) ≤ [128C(r + 1, S) + 16M (r + 1, S)ε−2
r+1 ]δ /Ĥ
−2 2
≤ [128C(r, S) − 128(Ncur + Nbig + s − 1)ε−2
r + 64(Nsma + Ncur )εr ]δ /Ĥ
2
≤ [128C(r, S) + (64Nsma − 64Ncur − 128Nbig − 128(s − 1))ε−2
r ]δ /Ĥ
2
≤ 128C(r, S)ε−2
r δ /Ĥ.
Here the last step follows from 64Nsma − 64Ncur − 128Nbig − 128(s − 1) ≤ 64(Nsma − Ncur −
Nbig − 1) ≤ 0.
Case 3: Med-Elim returns incorrectly.
2
In this case, the worst scenario is that we call Elimination with confidence δr′ ≤ 4|S|ε−2
r δ /Ĥ,
yet no arms are removed. So the conditional probability in this case is bounded by
2
P (r + 1, S) + 4|S|ε−2
r δ /Ĥ
2
−2
≤ 128C(r + 1, S) + 16M (r + 1, S)ε−2
δ /Ĥ
r+1 + 4|S|εr
−2
−2 2
≤[128C(r, S) − 128(Ncur + Nbig + s − 1)ε−2
r + 64(Nsma + Ncur )εr + 4(Nsma + Ncur + Nbig + 1)εr ]δ /Ĥ
2
≤[128C(r, S) + (68Nsma − 60Ncur − 124Nbig − 124)ε−2
r ]δ /Ĥ
≤ 128C(r, S) + 68M (r, S)ε−2
δ2 /Ĥ.
r
Recall that Case 3 happens with probability at most 0.01. Thus we have:
2
2
P (r, S) ≤ 0.01 128C(r, S) + 68M (r, S)ε−2
δ /Ĥ + 0.99 128C(r, S) + 10.4M (r, S)ε−2
δ /Ĥ
r
r
≤ 128C(r, S) + 16M (r, S)ε−2
δ2 /Ĥ.
r
34
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
The induction is completed. It follows from (7) that
′ +2
rX
i+1
r′
X
X
δ2 /Ĥ
ε−2
ε−2
|Gi |
P (1, S) ≤ 128
j
j + (s − 1)
r′
≤ 128 (4/3)
"
X
i+1
|Gi |4
i=0
n
X
≤ 128 (16/3)
≤ 3000s
j=1
j=1
i=0
"
+ (4/3)(s − 1)4
r′
∆−2
[i] + (64/3)(s − 1)4
i=s
n
X
i=s
r ′ +2
∆−2
[i]
!
#
#
δ2 /Ĥ
δ2 /Ĥ
δ2 /Ĥ.
B.3. Proof of Lemma B.1
Recall that tmax = ⌊log100 H⌋ − 2 and t′max = ⌈log100 [H(Ent + ln δ−1 )δ−1 ]⌉ + 2. We restate
and prove Lemma B.1 in the following.
Lemma B.1. (restated) With probability 1 − δ/3 conditioning on event E1 , Complexity-Guessing
halts before or at iteration t′max and it never returns a sub-optimal arm between iteration tmax + 1
and t′max .
The high-level idea of the proof is to construct three other “good events” E2 , E3 and E4 . We show
that each event happens with high probability conditioning on E1 . Moreover, events E1 through E4
together imply the desired event.
Proof Recall that tmax = ⌊log100 H⌋ − 2 and t′max = ⌈log100 [H(Ent + ln δ−1 )δ−1 ]⌉ + 2. Let E2
denote the following event: for all t such that t ≥ tmax + 1 and Ĥt < 1003 H, Entropy-Elimination
either rejects or outputs the optimal arm. Since Ĥtmax +1 = 100tmax +1 ≥ H/10000, there are at
most log100 [1003 H/(H/10000)] + 1 = 6 different values of such Ĥt . For each Ĥt , the probability
of returning a sub-optimal arm is bounded by the probability that the optimal arm is deleted, which
is in turn upper bounded by δ2 as a corollary of Lemma B.9 proved in the following section.
Thus, by a union bound,
Pr[E2 |E1 ] ≥ 1 − 6δ2 .
Let E3 be the event that for all Ĥt such that t ≤ t′max and Ĥt ≥ 1003 H (or equivalently,
⌈log100 H⌉ + 3 ≤ t ≤ t′max ), Entropy-Elimination never returns an incorrect answer. In fact, in
order for Entropy-Elimination to return incorrectly, some call of Elimination must be wrong. Thus
we may apply Lemma B.6 to bound the probability of E3 . Specifically, we apply Lemma B.6 with
35
C HEN L I Q IAO
s = 2. Then we have
t′max
Pr[E3 |E1 ] ≥ 1 −
≥1−
≥1−
3000s
X
t=⌈log100 H⌉+3
∞
X
P
n
−2
i=s ∆[i]
Ĥt
δ2
6000H 2
δ
100t
t=⌈log100 H⌉+3
∞
X
6000 2
δ ≥
100k
k=3
1 − δ2 /100.
Here the third step is due to the simple fact that 100⌈log 100 H⌉ ≥ H.
Finally, let E4 denote the event that when Entropy-Elimination runs on Ĥt′max , no Elimination
is wrong and the algorithm finally accepts. In order to bound the probability of the last event, we
simply apply Markov inequality based on Lemma B.4 and Lemma B.5. Let E0 be the event that no
Elimination is wrong when Entropy-Elimination runs on Ĥt′max . Then we have
Pr[E4 |E1 ] ≥ Pr[E0 |E1 ] −
E[H∞ |E0 ]
Ĥt′max
−
E[T∞ |E0 ]
100Ĥt′max
h
i
16H Ent + ln δ−1 + ln(Ĥt′max /H)
256H
−
+ ln δ−1 )δ−2
1003 H(Ent + ln δ−1 )δ−2
256 2 16 Ent + 3 ln δ−1 + ln(1002 (Ent + ln δ−1 )) 2
2
δ
δ −
≥1−δ −
1002
1003 (Ent + ln δ−1 )
≥ 1 − 2δ2 .
≥ 1 − δ2 −
1002 H(Ent
Note that conditioning on events E1 through E4 , Entropy-Elimination never outputs an incorrect
answer between iteration tmax + 1 and t′max . Moreover, our algorithm terminates before or at
iteration t′max . The lemma directly follows from a union bound and the observation that for all
δ ∈ (0, 0.01),
6δ2 + δ2 /100 + 2δ2 ≤ δ/3.
Remark B.7 The last part of the proof implies a more general fact: for fixed Ĥt , EntropyElimination accepts with probability at least
1 − δ2 −
256H
Ĥt
−
16H(Ent + ln δ−1 + ln(Ĥt /H))
100Ĥt
.
B.4. Mis-deletion of Arms
We prove Lemma B.2 in the following. Again, our analysis in this subsection conditions on
event E1 , which guarantees that all calls of Frac-Test and Unif-Sampl in Entropy-Elimination are
correct. The high-level idea of the proof is to show that a large proportion of arms will not be
accidentally removed before they have contributed a considerable amount to the total complexity.
Formally, we define the mis-deletion of arms as follows.
36
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Definition B.8 An arm A ∈ Gr is mis-deleted in a particular run of Entropy-Elimination, if A is
deleted before or at round r − 1. In particular, the optimal arm is mis-deleted if it is deleted in any
round.
The following lemma bounds the probability that a certain collection of arms are all mis-deleted.
Lemma B.9 For a fixed collection of k arms, the probability that all of them are mis-deleted is at
most δ2k .
Proof Let S = {A1 , A2 , . . . , Ak } be a fixed set of k arms. (Here we temporarily drop the convention that Ai denotes the arm with the i-th largest mean.) For each Ai , let Eibad denote the event
that Ai is mis-deleted, and let ri denote the group that contains Ai (i.e., Ai ∈ Gri ). By definition,
µAi ≥ µ[1] − εri .
We start by proving the following fact: suppose Elimination is called with confidence level δr′
in round r. Then the probability that all arms in S are mis-deleted in round r simultaneously is
bounded by δ′ kr .
We assume that r < ri for all i = 1, 2, . . . , k. Otherwise, if r ≥ ri for some i, then Ai cannot
be mis-deleted in round r, since the definition of mis-deletion requires that r < ri . To analyze the
behaviour of Elimination, we recall that each run of Elimination consists of several stages. (Here
we use the term “stage” for an iteration of Elimination, while the term for Entropy-Elimination is
“round”.) In each stage, procedure Unif-Sampl is called at line 6 to estimate the means of the arms
that have not been eliminated. Let ribad denote the stage in which Ai gets deleted.
Recall that dhigh
is the upper threshold used in Elimination in round r. According to Observar
tion A.5,
dhigh
≤ µ[1] (Sr ) − 0.5εr = µ[1] (Sr ) − 2−(r+1) ≤ µ[1] − εri ≤ µAi .
r
Here the third step follows from our assumption that r < ri . In order for Elimination to eliminate
an arm Ai with mean greater than dhigh in stage ribad , the Unif-Sampl subroutine must return an
incorrect estimation
for Ai (i.e., |µ̂Ai − µAi | > (dhigh − dmid )/2), which happens with probability
bad
. Since the samples taken on different arms are independent, the events that
at most δr′ / 10 · 2ri
Unif-Sampl returns incorrect estimates for different arms are also independent,
and it follows
that
Qk ′
bad
r
bad
.
the probability that each arm Ai is removed at stage ri is bounded by i=1 δr / 10 · 2 i
Therefore, the probability that all the k arms in S are mis-deleted in Elimination is upper
bounded by
∞
X
∞
X
r1bad =1 r2bad =1
=
k
Y
i=1
≤
k
Y
···
∞ Y
k
X
rkbad =1 i=1
bad
δr′ /(10 · 2ri )
∞
X
bad
δr′ / 10 · 2ri
ribad =1
k
δr′ = δ′ r .
i=1
Then we start with the proof of the lemma. Suppose that we are at the beginning of round r. m
arms among S are still in Sr , while the sum of confidence levels allocated in the previous rounds
37
C HEN L I Q IAO
Pr−1 ′
is δ′ (i.e., δ′ = i=1
δi ). Let P (r, δ′ , m) denote the probability that all the m remaining arms are
mis-deleted in the future. We prove by induction that
P (r, δ′ , m) ≤ (δ2 − δ′ )m .
(8)
Recall that the number of rounds that Entropy-Elimination lasts is bounded by ct according to
Observation A.1. Thus when r = ⌈ct⌉ + 1, we have P (r, δ′ , m) = 0. Observe that δ′ never exceeds
δ2 according to the behaviour of Entropy-Elimination. Therefore (8) holds for the base case. Now
we proceed to the induction step. If Elimination is not called in round r, by induction hypothesis
we have
P (r, δ′ , m) ≤ P (r + 1, δ′ , m) ≤ (δ2 − δ′ )m ,
which proves inequality (8). If, on the other hand, Elimination is called with confidence δr′ . We
observe that by the claim
we proved
above, the probability that exactly j arms among the m arms
m ′j
are mis-deleted is at most
δ r . Thus by a simple summation,
j
′
P (r, δ , m) ≤
m
X
m
j=0
j
j
δ′ r ·P (r +1, δ′ +δr′ , m−j)
≤
m
X
m
j=0
j
j
δ′ r (δ2 −δ′ −δr′ )m−j = (δ2 −δ′ )m ,
which completes the induction step.
Finally, the lemma directly follows from (8) by plugging in r = 1, δ′ = 0 and m = k.
Remark B.10 Let Eibad denote the event that Ai is mis-deleted. Note that although the events
{Eibad } are not independent, we can still obtain an exponential bound (i.e., δ2k ) on the probability
that k such events happen simultaneously. We call such events quasi-independent to reflect this
property. Formally, a collection of n events {Ei }ni=1 are δ-quasi-independent, if for all 1 ≤ k ≤ n
and 1 ≤ a1 < a2 < · · · < ak ≤ n, we have
Pr[Ea1 ∩ Ea2 ∩ · · · ∩ Eak ] ≤ δk .
Then the collection of events {Eibad } are δ2 -quasi-independent.
The following lemma proves a generalized Chernoff bound for quasi-independent events.
Lemma B.11 Suppose v1 , v2 , . . . , vn > 0. {Yi }ni=1 is a collection of random variables, where
the support of Yi is {0, vi }. Moreover, the collection of events {YP
i = vi } are δ-quasi-independent.
Let (S1 , S2 , . . . , Sm ) be a partition of {1, 2, . . . , n} such that j∈Si vj ≤ 1 for all i. Define
P
1 Pm
δ Pn
Xi = j∈Si Yj . Let X = m
i=1 Xi and p = m
i=1 vi . Then for all q ∈ (p, 1),
Pr[X ≥ q] ≤ e−mD(q||p) ,
where
D(x||y) = x ln(x/y) + (1 − x) ln[(1 − x)/(1 − y)]
is the relative entropy function.
38
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
Proof Let pi = δ
P
j∈Si
vj . Then p =
1
m
Pm
i=1 pi .
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
For t > 0, we have
Pr[X ≥ q] = Pr[etmX ≥ etmq ] ≤
E[etmX ]
.
etmq
To bound E[etmX ], we consider a collection of independent random
P variables Ỹ1 , Ỹ2 , . . . , Ỹn
defined by Pr[Ỹi = vi ] = δ and Pr[Ỹi = 0] = 1 − δ. Define X̃i = j∈Si Ỹj for i = 1, 2, . . . , m,
1 Pm
tmX can be written as
and X̃ = m
i=1 X̃i . Note that each term in the Taylor expansion of e
Ql
α i=1 Ynl , where l ≥ 0, (n1 , n2 , . . . , nl ) ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n}l , and α = tl /(l!) > 0. The correspondQ
ing term in etmX̃ is then α li=1 Ỹnl . Let U = |{ni : i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , l}}| denote the set of distinct
numbers among n1 , n2 , . . . , nl . We have
" l
#
#
" l
l
l
Y
Y
Y
Y
vn l = E
vnl ≤ δ|U |
Ỹnl .
Ynl = Pr[Yi = vi for all i ∈ U ] ·
E
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
Summing over all terms in the expansion yields
m
i
h
i Y
h
E etX̃i .
E etmX ≤ E etmX̃ =
i=1
Here the last step holds since {X̃i } are independent. Note that since X̃i ∈ [0, 1], it follows from
Jensen’s inequality that
i
i
h
h
E etX̃i ≤ E et X̃i + 1 − X̃i = pi et + 1 − pi .
Then
tmX
E e
Pm
≤
m
Y
(pi et + 1 − pi ) ≤ (pet + 1 − p)m .
i=1
1
Recall that p = m
i=1 pi . Here the last step follows from Jensen’s inequality and the concavity
t
of ln(e x + 1 − x) for t > 0.
By setting t = ln q(1−p)
p(1−q) , we have
Pr[X ≥ q] ≤
t
m
pe + 1 − p
E[etmX ]
≤
= e−mD(q||p) .
etmq
etq
The following lemma states that if a collection of arms with a considerable amount of total
complexity are not mis-deleted, Entropy-Elimination rejects Ĥ.
Lemma B.12 S is a set of sub-optimal arms with complexity H(S) > Ĥ. Let r ∗ = maxA∈S log2 ∆−1
A .
If in a particular run of Entropy-Elimination, no arm in S is mis-deleted and there exists an arm
A∗ outside S with µA∗ ≥ maxA∈S µA such that A∗ is not deleted in the first r ∗ − 1 rounds, then Ĥ
is rejected in that run.
39
C HEN L I Q IAO
Proof Suppose S = {A1 , A2 , . . . , Ak } and Ai ∈ Gri . Without loss of generality, µA1 ≤ µA2 ≤
· · · ≤ µAk . By definition of r ∗ , we have r ∗ = max1≤i≤k ri = rk . According to our assumption,
both Ak and A∗ are not deleted in the first r ∗ − 1 rounds. Thus Entropy-Elimination does not
accept in the first r ∗ rounds.
Suppose for contradiction that Ĥ is not rejected by Entropy-Elimination in a particular run.
Define R = {r ∈ [1, r ∗ − 1] : Elimination is called in round r}. Let N1 = {i ∈ [k] : ∃r ∈
R, r ≥ ri } and N2 = [k] \ N1 . For each i ∈ N1 , since Ai is not mis-deleted, Ai ∈ Sri . Define
ri′ = min{r ∈ R : r ≥ ri } as the first round after ri (inclusive) in which Elimination is called.
.
It follows that Ai ∈ Sri′ . At round ri′ of Entropy-Elimination, Hri′ +1 is set to Hri′ + 4|Sri′ |ε−2
r′
i
. It follows that Hr∗ is at least the total cost
= ε−2
Therefore we can “charge” Ai a cost of 4ε−2
ri′ +1
ri′
P
.
that arms in N1 are charged, i∈N1 ε−2
ri′ +1
For each i ∈ N2 , we have Ai ∈ Sri and Sri = Sr∗ . Thus it holds that |Sr∗ | ≥ |N2 |. When the
if-statement in Entropy-Elimination is checked in round r ∗ , we have
Hr ∗ +
4|Sr∗ |ε−2
r∗
≥
X
i∈N1
ε−2
ri′ +1
+ N2 ε−2
r ∗ +1
≥
k
X
i=1
ε−2
ri +1
≥
k
X
∆−2
Ai = H(S) > Ĥ.
i=1
Here the second step follows from ri′ ≥ ri and r ∗ ≥ ri , while the third step follows from ∆Ai ≥
2−(ri +1) . Therefore Entropy-Elimination rejects in round r ∗ , a contradiction.
B.5. Proof of Lemma B.2
Lemma B.2 is restated below. Recall that tmax = ⌊log100 H⌋ − 2.
Lemma B.2. (restated) With probability 1 − δ/3 conditioning on event E1 , Complexity-Guessing
never returns a sub-optimal arm in the first tmax iterations.
The high-level idea of the proof is simple. For each Ĥt , we identify a collection of near-optimal
“crucial arms”. By Lemma B.9, the probability that all “crucial arms” are mis-deleted is small, thus
we may assume that at least one crucial arm survives. This crucial arm serves as A∗ in Lemma B.12.
Then according to Lemma B.12, in order for Entropy-Elimination to accept Ĥt , it must mis-delete
a collection of “non-crucial” arms with a significant fraction of complexity. The probability of this
event can also be bounded by using the generalized Chernoff bound proved in Lemma B.11.
The major technical difficulty is the choice of “crucial arms”. We deal the following three cases
separately: (1) Ĥt is greater than ∆−2
[2] , the complexity of the arm with the second largest mean; (2)
−2
−2
Ĥt is between ∆−2
[s] and ∆[s−1] for some 3 ≤ s ≤ n; and (3) Ĥt is smaller than ∆[n] . We bound the
probability that the lemma is violated in each case, and sum them up using a union bound.
Proof [Proof of Lemma B.2]
Case 1: ∆−2
[2] ≤ Ĥt ≤ Ĥtmax .
We first deal with the case that Ĥt is relatively large. We partition the sequence of sub-optimal
arms A2 , A3 , . . . , An into contiguous
B1 , B2 , . . . , Bm such that the total complexity in each
P blocks −2
−2
−2
block Bi , denoted by H(Bi ) =
A∈Bi ∆A , is between ∆[2] and 3∆[2] . To construct such a
partition, we append arms to the current block one by one from A2 to An . When the complexity
40
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
of the current block exceeds ∆−2
[2] , we start with another block. Clearly, the complexity of each
. Note that the last block may have a complexity less than
resulting block is upper bounded by 2∆−2
[2]
. In that case, we simply merge it into the second last block. As a result, the total complexity
∆−2
[2]
i
i
h
h
−2
−2
−2
,
3m∆
.
It
follows
that
H
∈
m∆
,
3∆
of every block is in ∆−2
[2] .
[2]
[2]
[2]
≤ Ĥt <
For brevity, let B≤i denote B1 ∪B2 ∪· · ·∪Bi and B<i = B≤i−1 . Since H(B1 ) = ∆−2
[2]
H = H(B≤m ), therehexists a unique integer
i k ∈ [2, m] that satisfies H(B<k ) ≤ Ĥt < H(B≤k ).
−2
−2
Then we have Ĥt ∈ (k − 1)∆[2] , 3k∆[2] . Since B≤k contains at least k arms, it follows from
Lemma B.9 that with probability 1 − δ2k , at least one arm in B≤k is not mis-deleted. Recall that by
Lemma B.12, Entropy-Elimination accepts Ĥt only if either of the following two events happens:
(a) no arm in B≤k survives, which happens with probability δ2k ; (b) a collection of arms among
B>k with total complexity of at least H(B>k ) − Ĥ are mis-deleted.
−2
For i = 2, 3, . . . , n, define vi = ∆−2
[i] /(3∆[2] ) and Yi = vi · I[Ai is mis-deleted]. For i =
1, 2, . . . , m, Xi is defined as
Xi =
X
Aj ∈Bi
Yj =
X ∆−2
A
−2 · I[A is mis-deleted].
3∆
[2]
A∈B
i
In other words, Xi is the total complexity of the arms in block Bi that are mis-deleted, divided by a
−2
constant 3∆−2
[2] . Recall that H(Bi ) ≤ 3∆[2] , so Xi is between 0 and 1. Let
X=
n
m
X
1
1 X
∆−2
Xi =
−2
[i] · I[Ai is mis-deleted]
m
3m∆
[2]
i=2
i=1
denote the mean of these random variables. Since the events of mis-deletion of arms are δ2 -quasiindependent, we may apply Lemma B.11. Note that
−2
n
n
Hδ2
δ2 X
δ2 X ∆[i]
2
=
p=
vi =
−2
−2 ≤ δ .
m
m
3∆
3m∆
[2]
[2]
i=2
i=2
Here the last step applies H ≤ 3m∆−2
[2] . On the other hand, conditioning on event (b) (i.e., a
collection of arms with total complexity H(B>k ) − Ĥ are mis-deleted), we have
X=
n
X
1
∆−2
[i] · I[Ai is mis-deleted]
3m∆−2
[2] i=2
−2
(m − k)∆−2
H(B>k ) − Ĥ
[2] − 3k∆[2]
≥
≥
3m∆−2
3m∆−2
[2]
[2]
≥
m − 4k
m − 12m/10000
1
≥
≥ .
3m
3m
6
−2
Here the third step follows from H(B>k ) ≥ (m − k)∆−2
[2] and Ĥ ≤ 3k∆[2] . The last line holds
since
−2
k∆−2
[2] ≤ Ĥ ≤ Ĥtmax ≤ H/10000 ≤ 3m∆[2] /10000,
41
C HEN L I Q IAO
which implies k ≤ 3m/10000.
According to Lemma B.11, we have
Pr[X ≥ 1/6] ≤ exp −mD 1/6||δ2
1
5
m
5m
ln
= exp − ln 2 −
6
6δ
6
6(1 − δ2 )
≤ (6δ2 )m/6 · (6/5)5m/6 ≤ δm/6 .
Recall that D(x||y) stands for the relative entropy function. The last step follows from 6δ ·(6/5)5 ≤
1.
Therefore,
i
h
(9)
Pr Entropy-Elimination accepts Ĥt ≤ δ2k + δm/6 .
i
h
It remains to apply a union bound to (9) for all values of Ĥt in ∆−2
,
Ĥ
t
max . Recall that k ≥ 2,
[2]
and the ratio between different guesses Ĥt is at least 100. It follows that the values of k are distinct
for different values of Ĥt , and thus the sum of the first term, δ2k , can be bounded by
∞
X
k=2
δ2k =
δ4
≤ 2δ4 .
1 − δ2
For the second term, we note that the number of guesses Ĥt between ∆−2
[2] and Ĥtmax is at most
m
l
H
−2
− 1 ≤ log100 (3m) − 1.
tmax − log100 ∆−2
[2] + 1 ≤ log100 H − 2 − log 100 ∆[2] + 1 = log100
∆−2
[2]
In particular, if m < 1002 /3, no Ĥt will fall into [∆−2
[2] , tmax ]. Thus we focus on the nontrivial case
m ≥ 1002 /3. Then the sum of the second term δm/6 can be bounded by
2 /18
δm/6 · (log100 (3m) − 1) ≤ δ100
,
since δm/6 · (log100 (3m) − 1) decreases on [1002 /3, +∞) for δ ∈ (0, 0.01). Finally, we have
i
h
2
,
H
]
≤ 2δ4 + δ100 /18 ≤ 3δ4 .
Pr Entropy-Elimination accepts Ĥt for some Ĥt ∈ [∆−2
t
max
[2]
−2
Case 2: ∆−2
[s] ≤ Ĥ < ∆[s−1] for some 3 ≤ s ≤ n.
In this case, Ĥ is between the complexity of As−1 and As . Our goal is to prove an upper bound
of δΩ(s) on the probability of returning a sub-optimal arm for each specific s. Summing
Pover all s
yields a bound on the total probability. Our analysis depends on the ratio between Ĥ and ni=s ∆−2
[i] ,
the complexity of arms that are worse than As . Intuitively, when Ĥ is greater than the sum (Case
2-1), the contribution of the arms worse than As to the complexity is negligible. Thus we have to
rely on the fact that the s − 1 arms with the largest means will not be mis-deleted simultaneously
with high probability. On the other hand, when Ĥ is significantly smaller than the sum (Case 2-2),
we may apply the same analysis as in Case 1. Finally, if the value of Ĥ is between the two cases
(Case 2-3), it suffices to prove a relatively loose bound, since the number of possible values is small.
42
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
Case 2-1: Ĥ > 300000s
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Pn
−2
i=s ∆[i] .
In this case, our guess Ĥ is significantly larger than the total complexity of As , As+1 , . . . , An ,
yet Ĥ is smaller than the complexity of any one among the remaining arms. Thus intuitively,
in order to reject Ĥ, Entropy-Elimination should not mis-delete all the first s − 1 arms. More
formally, we have the following fact: in order for Entropy-Elimination to return a sub-optimal arm,
it must delete A1 along with at least s − 3 arms among A2 , A3 , . . . , As−1 before round r ∗ , where r ∗
r ∗ +1 ≥ ∆−2
is the group that contains As−1 . In fact, since 4ε−2
r∗ = 4
[s−1] ≥ Ĥt , Entropy-Elimination
∗
terminates before or at round r . If A1 is not deleted before round r ∗ , Entropy-Elimination can
only return A1 as the optimal arm, which is correct. If less than s−3 arms among A2 , A3 , . . . , As−1
are deleted before round r ∗ , for example Ai and Aj are not deleted (2 ≤ i < j ≤ s − 1), then both
of them are contained in Sr∗ . It follows that Entropy-Elimination does not return before round r ∗ .
We first bound the probability that A1 is deleted before round r ∗ . In order for this to happen,
some Elimination must return incorrectly. By Lemma B.6, the probability of this event is upper
bounded by
!
n
X
δ2 /Ĥt .
∆−2
3000s
[i]
i=s
In fact, we have a more general fact: the probability that a fixed set of k arms among {A2 , A3 , . . . , As−1 }
together with A1 are deleted before round r ∗ is bounded by
!
!
n
n
X
X
δ2(k+1) /Ĥt .
∆−2
δ2 /Ĥt · δ2k = 3000s
∆−2
3000s
[i]
[i]
i=s
i=s
The proof follows from combining the two inductions in the proof of Lemma B.6 and Lemma B.9,
and we omit it here. Since {A2 , A3 , . . . , As−1 } contains s − 2 subsets of size s − 3, the probability
that Entropy-Elimination returns an incorrect answer on a particular guess Ĥt is at most
!
n
X
−2
∆[i] δ2(s−2) /Ĥt .
(s − 2) · 3000s
i=s
It remains to apply a union bound on all Ĥt that fall into this case. Recall that Ĥt > 300000s
Pn
−2
i=s ∆[i]
and Ĥt grows exponentially in t at a rate of 100. Thus the total probability is upper bounded by
P
n
−2
∞
∞ 2(s−2)
δ2(s−2) (s − 2) X
3000s
∆
X
i=s [i]
1 2(s−2)
δ
(s − 2)
δ
(s − 2).
=
=
P
n
−2
k+1
100
99
100k · 300000s i=s ∆[i]
k=0
k=0
P
Case 2-2: Ĥ < ni=s ∆−2
[i] /(78s).
In this case, we apply the technique in the proof of Case 1. We partition
the sequence
As , As+1 , . . . , An
i
h
−2
−2
into m consecutive blocks B1 , B2 , . . . , Bm such that H(Bi ) ∈ ∆[s] , 3∆[s] . Let B≤i denote
Pn
−2
B1 ∪ B2 ∪ · · · ∪ Bi . Since H(B1 ) = ∆−2
i=s ∆[i] /(78s) < H(B≤m ), there
[s] ≤ Ĥ <
exists
a unique integer
i k ∈ [2, m] such that H(B<k ) ≤ Ĥ < H(B≤k ). It follows that Ĥ ∈
h
−2
−2
(k − 1)∆[s] , 3k∆[s] .
By Lemma B.12, in order for Entropy-Elimination to accept Ĥ, one of the following two events
happens: (a) Entropy-Elimination mis-deletes all arms in B≤k ∪ {A1 , A2 , . . . , As−1 }; (b) the total
43
C HEN L I Q IAO
complexity of mis-deleted arms among B>k is greater than H(B>k ) − Ĥ. Since B≤k contains at
least k arms, by Lemma B.9, the probability of event (a) is bounded by δ2(s+k−1) .
Again, we bound the probability of event (b) using the generalized Chernoff bound in Lemma B.11.
−2
For each i = s, s + 1, . . . , n, define vi = ∆−2
[i] /(3∆[s] ) and Yi = vi · I[Ai is mis-deleted]. Define
random variables {Xi : i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m}} as
Xi =
X
Yj =
Aj ∈Bi
1 X −2
∆A · I[A is mis-deleted].
3∆−2
[s] A∈B
i
Since H(Bi ) ≤ 3∆−2
[s] , Xi is between 0 and 1. Let
X=
n
m
X
1 X
1
∆−2
Xi =
[i] · I[Ai is mis-deleted]
−2
m
3m∆
[s]
i=s
i=1
denote the mean of these random variables. Since the events {Yi = vi } are δ2 -quasi-independent,
we may apply Lemma B.11. We have
n
p=
H(B≤m )δ2
δ2 X
vi =
≤ δ2 .
−2
m
3m∆
[s]
i=s
Here the last step applies H(B≤m ) ≤ 3m∆−2
[s] . On the other hand, conditioning on event (b) (i.e., a
collection of arms in B>k with total complexity H(B>k ) − Ĥ are mis-deleted), we have
n
X
1
· I[Ai is mis-deleted]
∆−2
X=
−2
3m∆[s] i=s [i]
−2
(m − k)∆−2
H(B>k ) − Ĥ
[s] − 3k∆[s]
≥
≥
3m∆−2
3m∆−2
[s]
[s]
≥
m − 4m/(26s)
1
m − 4k
≥
≥ .
3m
3m
6
. The last line holds
and Ĥ ≤ 3k∆−2
Here the third step follows from H(B>k ) ≥ (m − k)∆−2
[s]
[s]
since
−2
k∆−2
[s] ≤ Ĥ ≤ H(B≤m )/(78s) ≤ m∆[s] /(26s),
which implies k ≤ m/(26s). By Lemma B.11, we have
Pr[X ≥ 1/6] ≤ δm/6 ,
and thus the probability that Entropy-Elimination return an incorrect answer on Ĥt is bounded by
δ2(s+k−1) + δm/6 .
It remains to apply a union bound on all valus of Ĥt that fall into this case. Since k ≥ 2 and the
values of k are distinct, the sum of the first term is bounded by
∞
X
k=2
δ2(s+k−1) =
δ2s+2
≤ 2δ2s+2 .
1 − δ2
44
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
For the second term, note that the number of different values of Ĥt between ∆−2
[s] and
H(B≤m )/(78s) is bounded by
i
h
log100 H(B≤m )/(78s)/∆−2
[s] + 1 ≤ log 100 [m/(26s)] + 1.
Pn
−2
i=s ∆[i] /(78s)
In particular, if m < 26s, no Ĥt will fall into this case. So in the following we focus on the
nontrivial case that m ≥ 26s. Since The sum of the second term is at most
δm/6 (log100 [m/(26s)] + 1) ≤ δ13s/3 ≤ δ2s+2 .
Here the first step follows from the fact that δm/6 (log100 [m/(26s)] + 1) decreases on [26s, +∞)
for all δ ∈ (0, 0.01) and s ≥ 3. The second step follows from s ≤ 3.
Therefore, the total probability that Entropy-Elimination returns incorrectly in this sub-case is
bounded by
2δ2s+2 + δ2s+2 ≤ 3δ2s+2 .
Pn
P
−2
Case 2-3: Ĥ ∈ [ ni=s ∆−2
i=s ∆[i] ].
[i] /(78s), 300000s
In this case, we simply bound the probability of returning an incorrect answer by the probability
that at least s − 2 arms in {A1 , A2 , . . . , As−1 } are mis-deleted, which is in turn bounded by (s −
1)δ2(s−2) according to Lemma B.9. As in the argument of Case 2-1, suppose that two arms Ai and
Aj (1 ≤ i < j ≤ s − 1) are not mis-deleted. Let r ∗ be the group that contain As−1 . Then both Ai
r ∗ +1 ≥ ∆−2
and Aj are contained in Sr∗ . However, as 4ε−2
r∗ = 4
[s−1] ≥ Ĥt , Entropy-Elimination will
∗
reject in round r , which implies that Entropy-Elimination will never return a sub-optimal arm.
Note that at most
log100
300000s
+ 1 ≤ 2 log100 s + 5 = log10 s + 5
1/(78s)
different values of Ĥ fall into this case. Therefore, the total probability is bounded by
δ2(s−2) (log10 s + 5)(s − 1).
Combining Case 2-1 through Case 2-3 yields the following bound: the probability that Entropy−2
Elimination outputs an incorrect answer for some 3 ≤ s ≤ n and Ĥ ∈ [∆−2
[s] , ∆[s−1] ) is at most
n
X
1 2(s−2)
2s+2
2(s−2)
δ
(s − 2) + 3δ
+δ
(log10 s + 5)(s − 1)
99
s=3
n
X
6
2(s−2) s − 2
+ 3δ + (log10 s + 5)(s − 1)
δ
=
99
≤
s=3
∞
X
δ2(s−2) (log10 s + 6)(s − 1)
s=3
∞
X
2
≤δ
0.012(s−3) (log10 s + 6)(s − 1) ≤ 20δ2 .
s=3
Case 3: Ĥt < ∆−2
[n] .
45
=
C HEN L I Q IAO
Finally, we turn to the case that Ĥ is smaller than ∆−2
[n] . In this case, Complexity-Guessing
always rejects. Suppose An ∈ Gr∗ . Then in the first r ∗ − 1 rounds of Entropy-Elimination,
Frac-Test always returns False. Thus no elimination is done before round r ∗ . Since Ĥt < ∆−2
[n] ≤
∗
4ε−2
r ∗ , Entropy-Elimination directly rejects when checking the if-statement at round r .
Case 1 through Case 3 together directly imply the lemma, as 3δ4 + 20δ2 < δ/3 for all δ ∈
(0, 0.01).
Appendix C. Analysis of Sample Complexity
Recall that E1 is the event that all calls of Frac-Test and Unif-Sampl in Entropy-Elimination
return correctly. We bound the sample complexity of our algorithm using the following two lemmas.
Lemma C.1 Conditioning on E1 , the expected number of samples taken by Med-Elim and Elimination
in Complexity-Guessing is
O(H(Ent + ln δ−1 )).
Lemma C.2 Conditioning on E1 , the expected number of samples taken by Unif-Sampl and
Frac-Test in Complexity-Guessing is
−1
−1
O(∆−2
[2] ln ln ∆[2] polylog(n, δ )).
The two lemmas above directly imply the following theorem.
Theorem C.3 Conditioning on E1 , the expected sample complexity of Complexity-Guessing is
−1
−1
polylog(n,
δ
)
.
ln
ln
∆
O H(ln δ−1 + Ent) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
Theorems B.3 and C.3 together imply that Complexity-Guessing is a δ-correct algorithm for
Best-1-Arm, and its expected sample complexity is
−1
−1
polylog(n,
δ
)
ln
ln
∆
O H(ln δ−1 + Ent) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
conditioning on an event which happens with probability at least 1 − δ. However, to prove Theorem 1.11, we need a δ-correct algorithm with the desired sample complexity in expectation (not
conditioning on another event). In the following, we prove Theorem 1.11 using a parallel simulation
trick developed in Chen and Li (2015).
Proof [Proof of Theorem 1.11] Given an instance I of Best-1-Arm and a confidence level δ, we
define a collection of algorithms {Ak : k ∈ N}, where Ak simulates Complexity-Guessing on
instance I and confidence level δk = δ/2k . Then we construct the following algorithm A:
• A runs in iterations. In iteration t, for each k such that 2k−1 divides t, A simulates Ak until Ak
requires a sample from some arm A. A draws a sample from A, feeds it to Ak , and continue
simulating Ak until it requires another sample. After that, A temporarily suspends Ak .
• When some algorithm Ak terminates, A also terminates and returns the same answer.
46
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
We first note that if all algorithms in {Ak } are correct, A eventually returns the correct answer.
Recall that Ak is a δ/2k -correct
for Best-1-Arm. Thus by a simple union bound, A is
P∞ algorithm
k
correct with probability 1 − k=1 δ/2 = 1 − δ, thus proving that A is δ-correct.
It remains to bound the sample complexity of A. According to Theorem C.3, there exist constants C and m, along with a collection of events {Ek }, such that for each k, Pr[Ek ] ≥ 1 − δk , and
the expected number of samples taken by Ak conditioning on Ek is at most
i
h
−1
m
m −1
(ln
n
+
ln
δ
)
ln
ln
∆
C H · (ln δk−1 + Ent) + ∆−2
k
[2]
[2]
i
h
−1
m
−1 m
(ln
n
+
(k
ln
δ
)
)
ln
ln
∆
≤C H · (k ln δ + Ent) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
≤km · T (I).
i
h
−1
m
m −1
(ln
n
+
ln
δ
)
, the desired samln
ln
∆
Here T (I) denotes C H · (ln δ−1 + Ent) + ∆−2
[2]
[2]
ple complexity. The first step follows from the fact that ln δk−1 = ln δ−1 + k ≤ k ln δ−1 for
δ < 0.01.
Since different algorithms in {Ak } take independent samples, the events {Ek } are independent.
Define random variable σ as the minimum number such that event Eσ happens. Then it follows that
Pr[σ = k] ≤ Pr[E 1 ∩ E 2 ∩ · · · ∩ E k−1 ] ≤
k−1
Y
δi ≤ 0.01k−1 .
i=1
Let Tk denote the number of samples taken by Ak if it is allowed to run indefinitely (i.e., A does not
terminate). Conditioning on σ = k, we have E[Tk ] ≤ km · T (I). Moreover, A terminates before or
at iteration 2k−1 km · T (I). It follows that the number of samples taken by A is bounded by
∞
∞
X
X
2−(i−1) ≤ 2k km · T (I).
⌊2k−1 km · T (I)/2i−1 ⌋ ≤ 2k−1 km · T (I)
i=1
i=1
Thus the expected sample complexity of A is bounded by
∞
X
Pr[σ = k] · 2k km · T (I)
k=1
≤
∞
X
0.01k−1 · 2k km · T (I)
k=1
≤100T (I)
∞
X
0.02k km = O(T (I)).
k=1
Therefore, A is a δ-correct algorithm for Best-1-Arm with expected sample complexity of
−1
−1
O(H · (ln δ−1 + Ent) + ∆−2
[2] ln ln ∆[2] polylog(n, δ )).
We conclude the section with the proofs of Lemmas C.1 and C.2.
47
C HEN L I Q IAO
Proof [Proof of Lemma C.1] Suppose that Complexity-Guessing terminates after iteration t0 .
According to Entropy-Elimination, for each 1 ≤ t ≤ t0 , the algorithm takes O(Ĥt ) = O(100t )
samples in Med-Elim and Elimination when it runs on Ĥt . As 100t grows exponentially in t, it
suffices to bound the expectation of the last term, namely 100t0 .
Let t∗ = ⌈log100 H(Ent + ln δ−1 ) + 3⌉. We first show that when t ≥ t∗ , Entropy-Elimination
accepts Ĥt with constant probability. According to Remark B.7, the probability that EntropyElimination rejects Ĥt is upper bounded by
256H
Ĥt
+
H(Ent + ln δ−1 + ln(Ĥt /H))
100Ĥt
≤
256H
Ĥt /20
≤ 1/200.
+
3
100 H
100Ĥt
The first step follows from the following two observations. First, as Ĥt ≥ Ĥt∗ ≥ 1003 H(Ent +
ln δ−1 ), we have H(Ent + ln δ−1 ) ≤ 100−3 Ĥt . Second, since Ĥt /H ≥ 1003 and x ≥ 100 ln x
1
holds for all x ≥ 106 , we have H ln(Ĥt /H) ≤ H ·
(Ĥt /H) = Ĥt /100.
100
Therefore, the probability that t0 equals t∗ + k is bounded by 200−k for all k ≥ 1. It follows
from a simple summation on all possible t0 that
∞
X
100t Pr[t0 = t]
E 100t0 =
≤
t=1
t∗
X
t
100 · 1 +
t=1
∞
X
∗ +k
100t
· 200−k
k=1
t∗
= O H(Ent + ln δ−1 ) .
= O 100
Proof [Proof of Lemma C.2] When Entropy-Elimination runs on guess Ĥt , Unif-Sampl takes
−1
O(ε−2
r ln δr ) samples in the r-th round, while the number of samples taken by Frac-Test is
−1
−2
−1
−3
ln(θr − θr−1 )−1 = O ε−2
O ε−2
.
r ln δr (θr − θr−1 )
r ln δr (θr − θr−1 )
As the second term dominates the first, we focus on the complexity of Frac-Test in the following
analysis.
Recall that εr = 2−r , δr = δ/(50r 2 t2 ) ≥ δ2 /(r 2 t2 ) and θr − θr−1 = (ct − r)−2 /10. For each
t, suppose r ranges from 1 to rmax , then the complexity at iteration t is bounded by
rX
max
−1
−3
ε−2
r ln δr (θr − θr−1 )
r=1
rX
max
≤2
4r (ln δ−1 + ln r + ln t)[(ct − r)−2 /10]−3
r=1
rX
max
≤2000
4r (ln δ−1 + ln r + ln t)(ct − r)6
r=1
rmax
=O(4
(ln δ−1 + ln t)(ct − rmax )6 )
48
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
The last step follows from the observation that the last term dominates the summation, and the fact
ln rmax = O(ln t) due to Observation A.1.
Let random variable t0 denote the last t in the execution of Complexity-Guessing. As in the
proof of Lemma C.1, we define t∗ = ⌈log100 H(Ent + ln δ−1 ) + 3⌉. We have also shown that
Pr[t ≥ t0 + k] ≤ 200−k for all k ≥ 1. Thus, the expected complexity incurred after iteration t∗ can
be bounded by the complexity at iteration t∗ .
When t < log100 ∆−2
[2] , it follows from rmax ≤ ct − 1 that the complexity is
O(4ct (ln δ−1 + ln t)) = O(100t (ln δ−1 + ln t)).
Summing over t = 1, 2, . . . , log100 ∆−2
[2] yields
log100 ∆−2
[2]
X
−1
+ ln ln ∆−1
100t (ln δ−1 + ln t) = O(∆−2
[2] )).
[2] (ln δ
t=1
Clearly this term is bounded by the desired complexity.
−2
−1
∗
When log100 ∆−2
[2] ≤ t ≤ t , we choose rmax = log 2 ∆[2] = log4 ∆[2] . Note that in fact the
algorithm may not always terminate before or at round rmax . However, since the probability that
the algorithm lasts rmax + k rounds is bounded by O(100−k ), the contribution of those rounds to
total complexity is also dominated. Thus we have
t0
X
O(4rmax (ln δ−1 + ln t)(ct − rmax )6 )
t=log100 ∆−2
[2]
=
t0
X
6
−1
+ ln t)(ct − log4 ∆−2
O(∆−2
[2] ) )
[2] (ln δ
t=log100 ∆−2
[2]
−2 6
−2
−1
∗
∗
)
(ln
δ
+
ln
t
)(ct
−
log
∆
·
O
∆
=O t∗ − log100 ∆−2
4 [2]
[2]
[2]
)7
(ln δ−1 + ln t∗ )(ct∗ − log4 ∆−2
=O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
−2
−1 7
−1
)
+
ln
Ent
+
ln
δ
)
(ln
δ
+
ln
ln
H)(ln(H/∆
=O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
−1
−1
−1 7
(ln
δ
+
ln
ln
n)(ln
n
+
ln
δ
)
ln
ln
∆
=O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
−1
−1
polylog(n,
δ
)
.
ln
ln
∆
=O ∆−2
[2]
[2]
The fourth step follows from
O(ln t∗ ) = O(ln ln(H(Ent + ln δ−1 ))) = O(ln ln H + ln ln Ent + ln ln ln δ−1 ),
while the last two terms are dominated by ln δ−1 + ln ln H. The fifth step follows from the simple
observation that H/∆−2
[2] ≤ n and Ent = O(ln ln n).
49
C HEN L I Q IAO
Appendix D. Lower Bound
In this section, we prove Lemma 4.1. We restate it here for convenience.
Lemma 4.1. (restated) Suppose δ ∈ (0, 0.04), m ∈ N and A is a δ-correct algorithm for SIGN-ξ.
P is a probability distribution on {2−1 , 2−2 , . . . , 2−m } defined by P (2−k ) = pk . Ent(P ) denotes
the Shannon entropy of distribution P . Let TA (µ) denote the expected number of samples taken by
A when it runs on an arm with distribution N (µ, 1) and ξ = 0. Define αk = TA (2−k )/4k . Then,
m
X
pk αk = Ω(Ent(P ) + ln δ−1 ).
k=1
D.1. Change of Distribution
We introduce a lemma that is essential for proving the lower bound for SIGN-ξ in Lemma 4.1,
which is a special case of (Kaufmann et al., 2015, Lemma 1). In the following, KL stands for the
Kullback-Leibler divergence, while D(x||y) = x ln(x/y)+(1−x) ln[(1−x)/(1−y)] is the relative
entropy function.
Lemma D.1 (Change of Distribution) Let A be an algorithm for SIGN-ξ. Let A and A′ be two
instances of SIGN-ξ (i.e., two arms). PrA and PrA′ (EA and EA′ ) denote the probability law
(expectation) when A runs on instance A and A′ respectively. Random variable τ denotes the
number of samples taken by the algorithm. For all event E in Fσ , where σ is a stopping time with
respect to the filtration {Ft }, we have
′
EA [τ ]KL(A, A ) ≥ D Pr[E] Pr′ [E] .
A
A
D.2. Proof of Lemma 4.1
We start with an overview of our proof of Lemma 4.1. For each k, we consider the number of
samples taken by Algorithm A when it runs on an arm with mean 2−k . We first show that with high
probability, this number is between Ω(4k ) and O(4k αk ). Then we apply Lemma D.1 to show that
the same event happens with probability at least e−αk when the input is an arm with mean zero.
Since the probability of an event is at most 1, we would like to bound the sum of e−αk by 1, yet
the problem is that the events for different k may not be disjoint.
avoid this difficulty, we carefully
PTo
m
select P
a collection of disjoint events denoted by S. We bound k=1 e−dαk (for appropriate constant
d) by k∈S e−αk based on the way
Pwe construct S. After that, we use the “change of distribution”
argument (Lemma D.1) to bound k∈S e−αk by 1. As a result, we have the following inequality
for appropriate constant M , which is reminiscent of Kraft’s inequality in coding theory.
m
X
e−dαk ≤ M .
(10)
k=1
Once we obtain (10), the desired bound directly follows from a simple calculation.
Proof [Proof of Lemma 4.1] Fix m ∈ N. Recall that all arms are normal distributions with a
standard deviation of 1 and ξ is always equal to zero. 4k αk is the expected number of samples taken
50
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
by A on an arm A with distribution N (2−k , 1). It is well-known that to distinguish N (2−k , 1) from
N (−2−k , 1) with confidence level δ, Ω(4k ln δ−1P
) samples are required in expectation. Therefore,
−1
−1
we have αk = Ω(ln δ ) for P
all k. It follows that m
k=1 pk αk = Ω(ln δ ).
m
It remains to prove that k=1 pk αk = Ω(Ent(P )) for all 0.04-correct algorithms. For each
µ ∈ R, let Prµ and Eµ denote the probability and expectation when A runs on an arm with mean µ
(i.e., N (µ, 1)). Define random variable τA as the number of samples taken by A. Let c = 1/64. Let
Ek denote the event that A outputs “µ > 0” and τA ∈ [4k c, 16 · 4k αk ]. The following lemma gives
a lower bound of Pr0 [Ek ].
Lemma D.2
1
Pr[Ek ] ≥ e−αk .
0
4
Our second step is to choose a collection of disjoint events from {Ek : 1 ≤ k ≤ m}. We have
the following lemma.
Lemma D.3 There exists a set S ⊆ {1, 2, . . . , m} such that:
• {Ek : k ∈ S} is a collection of disjoint events.
P
Pm −dα
−αk for universal constants d and M independent of m and A.
k ≤ M
•
k∈S e
k=1 e
It follows that
m
X
e−dαk ≤ M
k=1
X
e−αk ≤ 4M
k∈S
X
k∈S
Pr[Ek ] = 4M .
0
Here the first two steps follow from Lemma D.3 and Lemma D.2, respectively. The last step follows
from the fact that {Ek : k ∈ S} is a disjoint collection of events.
Finally, for a distribution P on {2−1 , 2−2 , . . . , 2−m } defined by P (2−k ) = pk , we consider the
following optimization problem with variables α1 , α2 , . . . , αm :
minimize
m
X
pk αk
k=1
subject to
m
X
e−dαk ≤ 4M
k=1
P
−dαk =
The method of Lagrange multipliers yields that the minimum value is obtained when m
k=1 e
1
4M and e−dαk is proportional to pk . It follows that αk = − ln(4M pk ) and consequently
d
m
X
k=1
m
pk αk ≥
1
1X
pk (ln(4M )−1 + ln p−1
) = (Ent(P ) − ln(4M )) .
k
d
d
k=1
Note that d and M are constants independent of m, distribution P and algorithm A. This completes
the proof.
51
C HEN L I Q IAO
D.3. Proofs of Lemma D.2 and Lemma D.3
Finally, we prove the two technical lemmas.
Proof [Proof of Lemma D.2] Recall that our goal is to lower bound Pr0 [Ek ]. We first show that
Pr2−k [Ek ] ≥ 1/2 and then prove the desired lower bound by applying change of distribution. Recall
that Ek = (A outputs µ > 0) ∧ (τA ∈ [4k c, 16 · 4k αk ]). We have
h
i
h
i
Pr [Ek ] ≥ Pr [A outputs µ > 0] − Pr τA > 16 · 4k αk − Pr τA < 4k c
2−k
2−k
2−k
2−k
h
i
≥ 1 − 0.04 − 1/16 − Pr τA < 4k c
2−k
h
i
k
≥ 0.8 − Pr τA < 4 c .
2−k
Here the second step follows fromMarkov’sinequality and the fact that E2−k [τA ] = 4k αk .
It remains to show that Pr2−k τA < 4k c ≤ 0.3. Suppose towards a contradiction this does not
hold. Then we consider the algorithm A′ that simulates A in the following way: if A terminates
within 4k c samples, A′ outputs the same answer; otherwise A′ outputs nothing. Let PrA′ ,µ denote
the probability when A′ runs on an arm of mean µ. Moreover, let Ekbad denote the event that the
output is “µ > 0”. Then we have
i
h
i
h
Pr [Ekbad ] = Pr Ekbad ∧ τA < 4k c ≥ Pr τA < 4k c − 0.04 > 0.26.
2−k
2−k
A′ ,2−k
On the other hand, when we run A′ on an arm with mean −2−k , we have
i
i
h
h
Pr
Ekbad ≤ Pr Ekbad ≤ 0.04.
−2−k
A′ ,−2−k
Since A′ never takes more than 4k c samples, it follows from Lemma D.1 that
2c = 4k c · KL(N (2−k , 1), N (−2−k , 1))
≥ EA′ ,2−k [τA′ ] · KL(N (2−k , 1), N (−2−k , 1))
bad
bad
Pr [Ek ]
≥D
Pr [Ek ]
A′ ,2−k
A′ ,−2−k
≥ D(0.26||0.04) ≥ 0.2,
which leads to a contradiction as c = 1/64.
In the following, we lower bound Pr0 [Ek ] using change of distribution. Note that
D Pr [Ek ] Pr[Ek ] ≤ 4k αk · KL(N (2−k , 1), N (0, 1))
2−k
0
≤ 4k αk ·
Let θk = e−αk /4. We have
D(1/2||θk ) =
1 −k 2
2
= αk /2.
2
1
1
1
1
ln
≥ ln
= αk /2.
2 4θk (1 − θk )
2 4θk
52
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Since we have shown Pr2−k [Ek ] ≥ 1/2, the two inequalities above imply
1
Pr[Ek ] ≥ θk = e−αk .
0
4
Proof [Proof of Lemma D.3] We map each event Ek to an interval
Ik = [log4 (4k c) + 3, log4 (16 · 4k αk ) + 3] = [k, k + log4 αk + 5].
By construction, two events Ei and Ej are disjoint if and only if their corresponding intervals, Ii and
Ij , are disjoint.
We construct a subset of {1, 2, . . . , m} using the following greedy algorithm:
• Sort (1, 2, . . . , m) into a list (l1 , l2 , . . . , lm ) such that αl1 ≤ αl2 ≤ · · · ≤ αlm .
• While the list is not empty, we add the first element x in the list into set S. Let Sx = {y :
y is in the current list, and Ix ∩ Iy 6= ∅}. We remove all elements in Sx from the list.
Note that the way we construct S ensures that {Ek : k ∈ S} is indeed a disjoint collection
of events, which proves the first part of the lemma. Moreover, {Sk : k ∈ S} is a partition of
{1, 2, . . . , m}. Thus we have
m
X
XX
e−dαj .
(11)
e−dαk =
k=1
k∈S j∈Sk
It suffices to bound j∈Sk e−dαj by M e−αk for appropriate constants d and M . Summing over all
k yields the desired bound
m
X
X
e−dαk ≤
e−αk .
P
k=1
k∈S
According to our construction of S, for all j ∈ Sk we have αj ≥ αk . For each integer l ≥
⌊log4 αk ⌋, we consider the values of j such that log4 αj ∈ [l, l + 1). Recall that the interval
corresponding to event Ek is Ik = [k, k + log4 αk + 5]. In order for Ij to intersect Ik , we must
have j ∈ [k − log4 αj − 5, k + log4 αk + 5]. Since log4 αj < l + 1, j must be contained in
[k − l − 6, k + log4 αk + 5], and thus there are at most (log4 αk + l + 12) such values of j.
Recall that since Ik = [k, k + log4 αk + 5] is nonempty, we have αk ≥ 4−5 . In the following
calculation, we assume for simplicity that αk ≥ 1 for all k, since it can be easily verified that the
contribution of the terms with αk < 1 (i.e., l = −5, −4, . . . , −1) is a constant, and thus can be
53
C HEN L I Q IAO
covered by a sufficiently large constant M in the end. Then we have
X
e−dαj ≤
j∈Sk
≤
∞
X
X
l=⌊log4 αk ⌋ j∈Sk
∞
X
exp(−dαj )I[log4 αj ∈ [l, l + 1)]
exp(−d4l )(log4 αk + l + 12)
l=⌊log4 αk ⌋
= (log4 αk + 12)
∞
X
l=⌊log 4 αk ⌋
exp −d4l +
∞
X
l=⌊log4 αk ⌋
l exp −d4l
(12)
= (log4 αk + 12) · O(exp(−dαk )) + O(exp(−dαk ) · log4 αk )
≤ M (log4 αk + 12) exp(−dαk )
= M exp(−dαk + ln log4 αk + ln 12) ≤ M e−αk .
The first step rearranges the summation based on the value of l. The second step follows from the
observation that Sk contains at most log4 αk + l + 12 values of j corresponding to each l. The fourth
step holds since both summations decrease double-exponentially, and thus can be bounded by their
respective first terms. Then we find a sufficiently large constant M (which depends on d) to cover
the hidden constant in the big-O notation. Finally, the last step holds for sufficiently large d. In fact,
we first choose d according to the last step, and then find the appropriate constant M . Clearly the
choice of M and d is independent of the value of m and the algorithm A.
Remark D.4 Recall that all distributions are assumed to be Gaussian distributions with a fixed
variance of 1. In fact, our proof of Lemma 4.1 only uses the following property: the KL-divergence
between two distributions with mean µ1 and µ2 is Θ((µ1 − µ2 )2 ). Note that this property is indeed
essential to the “change of distribution” argument in the proof of Lemma D.2.
In general, suppose U is a set of real numbers and D = {Dµ : µ ∈ U } is a family of distributions with the following two properties: (1) the mean of distribution Dµ is µ; (2) KL(Dµ1 , Dµ2 ) ≤
C(µ1 − µ2 )2 for fixed constant C > 0. Then Lemma 4.1 also holds for distributions from D.
For instance, suppose D = {B(1, µ) : µ ∈ [1/2 − ε, 1/2 + ε]}, where ε ∈ (0, 1/2) is a constant
and B(1, µ) denotes the Bernoulli distribution with mean µ. Since
KL(B(1, p), B(1, q)) ≤
(p − q)2
(p − q)2
≤
,
q(1 − q)
1/4 − ε2
4
. It follows that Lemma 4.1
1 − 4ε2
also holds for Bernoulli distributions with means sufficiently away from 0 and 1.
distribution family D satisfies the condition above with C =
Appendix E. Missing Proofs in Section 5
In this section, we present the technical details in the proofs of Lemma 5.5 and Lemma 5.6.
These are essentially identical to the proofs of Lemmas B.4 and B.5, which either use a potential
function or apply a charging argument.
54
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
E.1. Proof of Lemma 5.5
Proof [Proof of Lemma 5.5 (continued)] Recall that P (r, Sr ) is defined as the probability that,
given the value of Sr at the beginning of round r, at least one call to Elimination returns incorrectly
at round r or later rounds, while Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test always return correctly. We prove
inequality (2) by induction: for any Sr that contains the optimal arm A1 ,
P (r, Sr ) ≤
where
C(r, Sr ) :=
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 16M (r, Sr )ε−2
,
r
Ĥ
∞
X
|Sr ∩ Gi |
ε−2
j
+
rmax
X+1
ε−2
i ,
i=r
j=r
i=r−1
and
i+1
X
M (r, Sr ) := |Sr ∩ G≤r−2 |.
Note that if |Sr | = 1, the algorithm directly terminates at round r, and the inequality clearly holds.
Thus, we assume |Sr | ≥ 2 in the following.
Base case. We prove the base case r = rmax + 2, where rmax = maxGr 6=∅ r. Note that
C(r, S) = 0 and M (r, S) = |S| − 1 for r = rmax + 2 and any S ⊆ I with A1 ∈ S.
Let random variable r ∗ be the smallest integer greater than or equal to r, such that Med-Elim
is correct at round r ∗ . Note that for k ≥ r, Pr [r ∗ = k] ≤ 0.01k−r . We claim that conditioning
on r ∗ = k, if Elimination is correct between round r and round k, the algorithm will terminate
at round k + 1. Consequently, the probability that Elimination fails in some round is bounded by
the probabilityP
that it fails between round r and k. This allows us to upper bound the conditional
probability by ki=r δi′ .
Now we prove the claim. By Observation 5.8, the lower threshold used in Frac-Test at round
k, denoted by clow
k , is greater than or equal to µ[1] − εk . Since k ≥ r = rmax + 2,
|{A ∈ S : µA < clow
k }| ≥ |{A ∈ S : µA < µ[1] −εk }| = |S∩G≤k−1 | ≥ |S∩G≤rmax +1 | = |S|−1 ≥ 0.5|S|.
Thus by Fact 5.3, Frac-Test is guaranteed to return True in round k, and the algorithm calls
Elimination. Then, by Observation 5.9, it holds that dlow
k ≥ µ[1] −0.5εk . Assuming that Elimination
returns correctly at round k, the set returned by Elimination, denoted by Sk+1 , satisfies |{A ∈
Sk+1 : µA < dlow
k }| < 0.1|Sk+1 |, which implies
|Sk+1 | − 1 ≤ |Sk+1 ∩ G≤k | = |{A ∈ Sk+1 : µA < µ[1] − 0.5εk }| < 0.1|Sk+1 |.
Thus we have |Sk+1 | = 1, which proves the claim.
Summing over all possible k yields that the probability that Elimination returns incorrectly is
upper bounded by
∞
X
k=r
Pr [r ∗ = k]
k
X
δj′ ≤
j=r
∞
X
0.01k−r
j=r
∞
X
|Sr |ε−2
r δ
k=r
4
≤ ·
3
≤
k
X
|Sj |ε−2
j
Ĥ
2|Sr |ε−2
r δ
Ĥ
Ĥ
δ
0.01k−r · 4k−r
k=r
≤
δ
Ĥ
55
128C(r, Sr ) + 16M (r, Sr )ε−2
.
r
C HEN L I Q IAO
Inductive step. Assuming that the inequality holds for r + 1 and all Sr+1 that contains A1 ,
we bound the probability P (r, Sr ). We first note that both C and M are monotone in the following
sense: C(r, S) ≤ C(r, S ′ ) and M (r, S) ≤ M (r, S ′ ) for S ⊆ S ′ . Moreover, we have
C(r, Sr ) − C(r + 1, Sr ) =
∞
X
−2
−2
|Sr ∩ Gi |ε−2
r + εr = εr (|Sr ∩ G≥r−1 | + 1).
(13)
i=r−1
We consider the following three cases separately:
• Case 1. Med-Elim is correct and Frac-Test returns True.
• Case 2. Med-Elim is correct and Frac-Test returns False.
• Case 3. Med-Elim is incorrect.
Let P1 through P3 denote the conditional probability of the event that Elimination fails at some
round while Unif-Sampl and Frac-Test are correct in Case 1 through Case 3.
Upper bound P1 . Assuming that Frac-Test returns True, procedure Elimination will be called
at round r. By a union bound, we have P1 ≤ P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) + δr′ , where Sr+1 is the set of arms
returned by Elimination. According to the inductive hypothesis, the monotonicity of C, and identity
(13),
P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) ≤
≤
=
δ
Ĥ
δ
Ĥ
δ
Ĥ
128C(r + 1, Sr+1 ) + 16M (r + 1, Sr+1 )ε−2
r+1
128C(r + 1, Sr ) + 64M (r + 1, Sr+1 )ε−2
r
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
r (64M (r + 1, Sr+1 ) − 128|Sr ∩ G≥r−1 | − 128) .
(14)
≤ µ[1] − εr . If Elimination returns correctly at round r, we have
By Observation 5.9, dlow
r
M (r+1, Sr+1 ) = |{A ∈ Sr+1 : µA < µ[1] −εr }| ≤ |{A ∈ Sr+1 : µA < dlow
r }| < 0.1|Sr+1 | ≤ 0.1|Sr |.
For brevity, let Nsma , Ncur and Nbig denote |Sr ∩ G≤r−2 |, |Sr ∩ Gr−1 | and |Sr ∩ G≥r |, respectively.
Note that |Sr | = Nsma + Ncur + Nsma + 1. Then we have
P1 ≤ P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) + δr′
δ
≤
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
r (|Sr | + 64M (r + 1, Sr+1 ) − 128|Sr ∩ G≥r−1 | − 128)
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
≤
r (7.4(Nsma + Ncur + Nbig + 1) − 128(Ncur + Nbig + 1))
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 7.4ε−2
≤
r Nsma .
Ĥ
56
T OWARDS I NSTANCE O PTIMAL B OUNDS
FOR
B EST A RM I DENTIFICATION
Upper bound P2 . Since Frac-Test returns True, procedure Elimination is not called. Then
P2 ≤ P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) = P (r + 1, Sr ). By inequality (14),
P2 ≤
≤
≤
δ
Ĥ
δ
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
r (64M (r + 1, Sr ) − 128|Sr ∩ G≥r−1 | − 128)
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
r (64(Nsma + Ncur ) − 128(Ncur + Nbig + 1))
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 64ε−2
· 128C(r, Sr ).
r (Nsma − Ncur − Nbig − 1) ≤
Ĥ
Ĥ
Here the last step holds since by Observation 5.8, clow
≥ µ[1] − 2εr , and thus Frac-Test returns
r
False implies that
Nsma = |Sr ∩ G≤r−2 | = |{A ∈ Sr : µA < εr−1 }| < 0.5|Sr | = (Nsma + Ncur + Nbig + 1)/2.
Upper bound P3 . By (14) and M (r + 1, Sr+1 ) ≤ M (r + 1, Sr ), we have
P3 ≤ P (r + 1, Sr+1 ) + δr′
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
≤
r (64M (r + 1, Sr ) − 128|Sr ∩ G≥r−1 | − 128 + |Sr |)
Ĥ
δ
=
128C(r, Sr ) + ε−2
r (64(Nsma + Ncur ) − 128(Ncur + Nbig ) − 128 + (Nsma + Ncur + Nbig + 1))
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 65ε−2
≤
r Nsma .
Ĥ
Recall that Case 3 happens with probability at most 0.01, and Nsma = |Sr ∩G≤r−2 | = M (r, Sr ).
Therefore, we obtain the following bound on P (r, Sr ), which finishes the proof.
δ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 65ε−2
128C(r, Sr ) + 7.4ε−2
r Nsma + 0.99 ·
r Nsma
Ĥ
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 16ε−2
≤
r Nsma
Ĥ
δ
128C(r, Sr ) + 16M (r, Sr )ε−2
.
≤
r
Ĥ
P (r, Sr ) ≤ 0.01 ·
E.2. Proof of Lemma 5.6
Proof [Proof of Lemma 5.6 (continued)] Recall that for each round i, ri is defined as the largest
integer r such that |G≥r | ≥ 0.5|Si |, and
0,
j < ri ,
Ti,j =
H
−2
, j ≥ ri
ln δ−1 + ln
εi
|Gj |εi−2
is the number of samples that each arm in Gj is charged at round i.
57
C HEN L I Q IAO
H
We first show that j |Gj |Ti,j is an upper bound on
+ ln
, the num|Si |ε−2
i
ber of samples taken by Med-Elim and Elimination at round i. Recall that |G≥ri | ≥ 0.5|Si |. By
definition of Ti,j ,
X
X
H
−2
−1
|Gj |Ti,j =
|Gj |εi
ln δ + ln
|Gj |εi−2
j
j≥ri
H
−2
−1
≥ |G≥ri |εi
ln δ + ln
|Si |ε−2
i
H
1
−2
−1
.
ln δ + ln
≥ |Si |εi
2
|Si |ε−2
i
P
Then we prove the upper bound on i E[Ti,j ], the expected number of samples that each arm
in Gj is charged. For i ≤ j + 1, we have the straightforward bound
H
−2
−1
E[Ti,j ] ≤ εi
ln δ + ln
.
(15)
|Gj |ε−2
i
|Si |ε−2
i
P
ln δ−1
For i ≥ j + 2, we note that Ti,j is non-zero only if j ≥ ri , which implies that |G≥j+1 | < 0.5|Si |.
We claim that this happens only if Med-Elim fails between round j + 2 and round i − 1, which
happens with probability at most 0.01i−j−1 . In fact, suppose Med-Elim is correct at some round k,
≥ µ[1] − 2εk and dlow
≥ µ[1] − εk ,
where j + 2 ≤ k ≤ i − 1. By Observations 5.8 and 5.9, clow
k
k
low
low
where c and d are the two lower thresholds used in Frac-Test and Elimination. If Frac-Test
returns False, by Fact 5.3, we have
|Sk ∩ G<k−1 | = {A ∈ Sk : µA < µ[1] − 2εk } ≤ {A ∈ Sk : µA < clow
k } < 0.5|Sk |.
Since Sk+1 = Sk in this case, it follows that |Sk+1 ∩ G<k−1 | < 0.5|Sk+1 |. If Frac-Test returns
True and the algorithm calls Elimination, by Fact 5.4,
|Sk+1 ∩ G<k | = |{A ∈ Sk+1 : µA < µ[1] − εk }| ≤ |{A ∈ Sk+1 : µA < dlow
k }| < 0.1|Sk+1 |.
In either case, we have |Sk+1 ∩ G≥k−1 | > 0.5|Sk+1 |, and thus,
|G≥j+1 | ≥ |G≥k−1 | ≥ |Sk+1 ∩ G≥k−1 | > 0.5|Sk+1 | ≥ 0.5|Si |,
which contradicts |G≥j+1 | < 0.5|Si |. Therefore, for i ≥ j + 2, we have
H
−2
−1
E[Ti,j ] = Pr [Ti,j > 0] · εi
ln δ + ln
|Gj |εi−2
H
−2
i−j−1
−1
.
≤ 0.01
· εi
ln δ + ln
|Gj |ε−2
i
By (15) and (16), a direct summation gives
X
i
E[Ti,j ] = O ε−2
j
H
ln δ−1 + ln
|Gj |ε−2
j
58
!!
.
(16)
| 8cs.DS
|
Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit with General
Reward Functions
arXiv:1610.06603v3 [cs.LG] 1 Feb 2017
Wei Chen∗
Wei Hu†
Fu Li‡
Jian Li§
Yu Liu¶
Pinyan Luk
Abstract
In this paper, we study the stochastic combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB)
framework that allows a general nonlinear reward function, whose expected value
may not depend only on the means of the input random variables but possibly on
the entire distributions of these variables. Our framework enables a much larger
class of reward functions such as the max() function and nonlinear utility functions. Existing techniques relying on accurate estimations of the means of random variables, such as the upper confidence bound (UCB) technique, do not work
directly on these functions. We propose a new algorithm called stochastically
dominant confidence bound (SDCB), which estimates the distributions of underlying random variables and their stochastically dominant confidence bounds.√We
prove that SDCB can achieve O(log T ) distribution-dependent regret and Õ( T )
distribution-independent regret, where T is the time horizon. We apply our results
to the K-MAX problem and expected utility maximization problems. In particular, for K-MAX, we provide the first polynomial-time
√ approximation scheme
(PTAS) for its offline problem, and give the first Õ( T ) bound on the (1 − ǫ)approximation regret of its online problem, for any ǫ > 0.
1 Introduction
Stochastic multi-armed bandit (MAB) is a classical online learning problem typically specified as a
player against m machines or arms. Each arm, when pulled, generates a random reward following an
unknown distribution. The task of the player is to select one arm to pull in each round based on the
historical rewards she collected, and the goal is to collect cumulative reward over multiple rounds
as much as possible. In this paper, unless otherwise specified, we use MAB to refer to stochastic
MAB.
MAB problem demonstrates the key tradeoff between exploration and exploitation: whether the
player should stick to the choice that performs the best so far, or should try some less explored
alternatives that may provide better rewards. The performance measure of an MAB strategy is its
cumulative regret, which is defined as the difference between the cumulative reward obtained by
always playing the arm with the largest expected reward and the cumulative reward achieved by the
learning strategy. MAB and its variants have been extensively studied
in the literature, with classical
√
results such as tight Θ(log T ) distribution-dependent and Θ( T ) distribution-independent upper
and lower bounds on the regret in T rounds [19, 2, 1].
An important extension to the classical MAB problem is combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB).
In CMAB, the player selects not just one arm in each round, but a subset of arms or a combinatorial
∗
Microsoft Research, email: [email protected]. The authors are listed in alphabetical order.
Princeton University, email: [email protected].
‡
The University of Texas at Austin, email: [email protected].
§
Tsinghua University, email: [email protected].
¶
Tsinghua University, email: [email protected].
k
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, email: [email protected].
†
30th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2016), Barcelona, Spain.
object in general, referred to as a super arm, which collectively provides a random reward to the
player. The reward depends on the outcomes from the selected arms. The player may observe partial
feedbacks from the selected arms to help her in decision making. CMAB has wide applications
in online advertising, online recommendation, wireless routing, dynamic channel allocations, etc.,
because in all these settings the action unit is a combinatorial object (e.g. a set of advertisements,
a set of recommended items, a route in a wireless network, and an allocation between channels
and users), and the reward depends on unknown stochastic behaviors (e.g. users’ click through
behaviors, wireless transmission quality, etc.). Therefore CMAB has attracted a lot of attention in
online learning research in recent years [12, 8, 22, 15, 7, 16, 18, 17, 23, 9].
Most of these studies focus on linear reward functions, for which the expected reward for playing a
super arm is a linear combination of the expected outcomes from the constituent base arms. Even for
studies that do generalize to non-linear reward functions, they typically still assume that the expected
reward for choosing a super arm is a function of the expected outcomes from the constituent base
arms in this super arm [8, 17]. However, many natural reward functions do not satisfy this property.
For example, for the function max(), which takes a group of variables and outputs the maximum one
among them, its expectation depends on the full distributions of the input random variables, not just
their means. Function max() and its variants underly many applications. As an illustrative example,
we consider the following scenario in auctions: the auctioneer is repeatedly selling an item to m
bidders; in each round the auctioneer selects K bidders to bid; each of the K bidders independently
draws her bid from her private valuation distribution and submits the bid; the auctioneer uses the
first-price auction to determine the winner and collects the largest bid as the payment.1 The goal of
the auctioneer is to gain as high cumulative payments as possible. We refer to this problem as the
K-MAX bandit problem, which cannot be effectively solved in the existing CMAB framework.
Beyond the K-MAX problem, many expected utility maximization (EUM) problems are studied in
stochastic
P optimization literature [27, 20, 21, 4]. The problem can be formulated as maximizing
E[u( i∈S Xi )] among all feasible sets S, where Xi ’s are independent random variables and u(·)
is a utility function. For example, Xi could be the random delay of edge ei in a routing graph,
S is a routing path in the graph, and the objective is maximizing the utility obtained from any
routing path, and typically the shorter the delay, the larger the utility. The utility function u(·) is
typically nonlinear to model risk-averse or risk-prone behaviors of users (e.g. a concave utility
function is often used to model risk-averse behaviors). The non-linear utility function makes the
objective function much more complicated: in particular, it is no longer a function of the means of
the underlying random variables Xi ’s. When the distributions of Xi ’s are unknown, we can turn
EUM into an online learning problem where the distributions of Xi ’s need to be learned over time
from online feedbacks, and we want to maximize the cumulative reward in the learning process.
Again, this is not covered by the existing CMAB framework since only learning the means of Xi ’s
is not enough.
In this paper, we generalize the existing CMAB framework with semi-bandit feedbacks to handle
general reward functions, where the expected reward for playing a super arm may depend more than
just the means of the base arms, and the outcome distribution of a base arm can be arbitrary. This
generalization is non-trivial, because almost all previous works on CMAB rely on estimating the
expected outcomes from base arms, while in our case, we need an estimation method and an analytical tool to deal with the whole distribution, not just its mean. To this end, we turn the problem
into estimating the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of each arm’s outcome distribution. We
use stochastically dominant confidence bound (SDCB) to obtain a distribution that stochastically
dominates the true distribution with high probability, and hence
√ we also name our algorithm SDCB.
We are able to show O(log T ) distribution-dependent and Õ( T ) distribution-independent regret
bounds in T rounds. Furthermore, we propose a more efficient algorithm called Lazy-SDCB, which
first executes a discretization step
√ and then applies SDCB on the discretized problem. We show that
Lazy-SDCB also achieves Õ( T ) distribution-independent regret bound. Our regret bounds are
tight with respect to their dependencies on T (up to a logarithmic factor for distribution-independent
bounds). To make our scheme work, we make a few reasonable assumptions, including boundedness,
monotonicity and Lipschitz-continuity2 of the reward function, and independence among base arms.
We apply our algorithms to the K-MAX and EUM problems, and provide efficient solutions with
1
We understand that the first-price auction is not truthful, but this example is only for illustrative purpose
for the max() function.
2
The Lipschitz-continuity assumption is only made for Lazy-SDCB. See Section 4.
2
concrete regret bounds. Along the way, we also provide the first polynomial time approximation
scheme (PTAS) for the offline K-MAX problem, which is formulated as maximizing E[maxi∈S Xi ]
subject to a cardinality constraint |S| ≤ K, where Xi ’s are independent nonnegative random variables.
To summarize, our contributions include: (a) generalizing the CMAB framework to allow a general reward function whose expectation may depend on the entire distributions of the input random
variables; (b) proposing the SDCB algorithm to achieve efficient learning in this framework with
near-optimal regret bounds, even for arbitrary outcome distributions; (c) giving the first PTAS for
the offline K-MAX problem. Our general framework treats any offline stochastic optimization algorithm as an oracle, and effectively integrates it into the online learning framework.
Related Work. As already mentioned, most relevant to our work are studies on CMAB frameworks, among which [12, 16, 18, 9] focus on linear reward functions while [8, 17] look into nonlinear reward functions. In particular, Chen et al. [8] look at general non-linear reward functions
and Kveton et al. [17] consider specific non-linear reward functions in a conjunctive or disjunctive
form, but both papers require that the expected reward of playing a super arm is determined by the
expected outcomes from base arms.
The only work in combinatorial bandits we are aware of that does not require the above assumption on the expected reward is [15], which is based on a general Thompson sampling framework.
However, they assume that the joint distribution of base arm outcomes is from a known parametric
family within known likelihood function and only the parameters are unknown. They also assume
the parameter space to be finite. In contrast, our general case is non-parametric, where we allow
arbitrary bounded distributions. Although in our known finite support case the distribution can be
parametrized by probabilities on all supported points, our parameter space is continuous. Moreover,
it is unclear how to efficiently compute posteriors in their algorithm, and their regret bounds depend
on complicated problem-dependent coefficients which may be very large for many combinatorial
problems. They also provide a result on the K-MAX problem, but they only consider Bernoulli
outcomes from base arms, much simpler than our case where general distributions are allowed.
There are extensive studies on the classical MAB problem, for which we refer to a survey by Bubeck
and Cesa-Bianchi [5]. There are also some studies on adversarial combinatorial bandits, e.g. [26, 6].
Although it bears conceptual similarities with stochastic CMAB, the techniques used are different.
Expected utility maximization (EUM) encompasses a large class of stochastic optimization problems
and has been well studied (e.g. [27, 20, 21, 4]). To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study
the online learning version of these problems, and we provide a general solution to systematically
address all these problems as long as there is an available offline (approximation) algorithm. The
K-MAX problem may be traced back to [13], where Goel et al. provide a constant approximation
algorithm to a generalized version in which the objective is to choose a subset S of cost at most K
and maximize the expectation of a certain knapsack profit.
2 Setup and Notation
Problem Formulation. We model a combinatorial multi-armed bandit (CMAB) problem as a tuple (E, F , D, R), where E = [m] = {1, 2, . . . , m} is a set of m (base) arms, F ⊆ 2E is a set
of subsets of E, D is a probability distribution over [0, 1]m , and R is a reward function defined on
[0, 1]m × F . The arms produce stochastic outcomes X = (X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm ) drawn from distribution D, where the i-th entry Xi is the outcome from the i-th arm. Each feasible subset of arms
S ∈ F is called a super arm. Under a realization of outcomes x = (x1 , . . . , xm ), the player receives
a reward R(x, S) when she chooses the super arm S to play. Without loss of generality, we assume
the reward value to be nonnegative. Let K = maxS∈F |S| be the maximum size of any super arm.
Let X (1) , X (2) , . . . be an i.i.d. sequence of random vectors drawn from D, where X (t) =
(t)
(t)
(X1 , . . . , Xm ) is the outcome vector generated in the t-th round. In the t-th round, the player
(t)
chooses a super arm St ∈ F to play, and then the outcomes from all arms in St , i.e., {Xi | i ∈ St },
are revealed to the player. According to the definition of the reward function, the reward value in the
t-th round is R(X (t) , St ). The expected reward for choosing a super arm S in any round is denoted
by rD (S) = EX∼D [R(X, S)].
3
We also assume that for a fixed super arm S ∈ F , the reward R(x, S) only depends on the revealed
outcomes xS = (xi )i∈S . Therefore, we can alternatively express R(x, S) as RS (xS ), where RS is
a function defined on [0, 1]S .3
A learning algorithm A for the CMAB problem selects which super arm to play in each round
based on the revealed outcomes in all previous rounds. Let StA be the super arm selected by A
to maximize the expected cumulative reward in T rounds, which
in the
t-th round.4 The goal
hP
i is
PT
T
(t)
A
is E
, St ) = t=1 E rD (StA ) . Note that when the underlying distribution D is
t=1 R(X
known, the optimal algorithm A∗ chooses the optimal super arm S ∗ = argmaxS∈F {rD (S)} in
every round. The quality of an algorithm A is measured by its regret in T rounds, which is the
difference between the expected cumulative reward of the optimal algorithm A∗ and that of A:
∗
RegA
D (T ) = T · rD (S ) −
T
X
t=1
E rD (StA ) .
For some CMAB problem instances, the optimal super arm S ∗ may be computationally hard to find
even when the distribution D is known, but efficient approximation algorithms may exist, i.e., an
α-approximate (0 < α ≤ 1) solution S ′ ∈ F which satisfies rD (S ′ ) ≥ α · maxS∈F {rD (S)} can
be efficiently found given D as input. We will provide the exact formulation of our requirement
on such an α-approximation computation oracle shortly. In such cases, it is not fair to compare a
CMAB algorithm A with the optimal algorithm A∗ which always chooses the optimal super arm S ∗ .
Instead, we define the α-approximation regret of an algorithm A as
∗
RegA
D,α (T ) = T · α · rD (S ) −
T
X
t=1
E rD (StA ) .
As mentioned, almost all previous work on CMAB requires that the expected reward rD (S) of a
super arm S depends only on the expectation vector µ = (µ1 , . . . , µm ) of outcomes, where µi =
EX∼D [Xi ]. This is a strong restriction that cannot be satisfied by a general nonlinear function RS
and a general distribution D. The main motivation of this work is to remove this restriction.
Assumptions. Throughout this paper, we make several assumptions on the outcome distribution
D and the reward function R.
Assumption 1 (Independent outcomes from arms). The outcomes from all m arms are mutually
independent, i.e., for X ∼ D, X1 , X2 , . . . , Xm are mutually independent. We write D as D =
D1 × D2 × · · · × Dm , where Di is the distribution of Xi .
We remark that the above independence assumption is also made for past studies on the offline EUM
and K-MAX problems [27, 20, 21, 4, 13], so it is not an extra assumption for the online learning
case.
Assumption 2 (Bounded reward value). There exists M > 0 such that for any x ∈ [0, 1]m and any
S ∈ F , we have 0 ≤ R(x, S) ≤ M .
Assumption 3 (Monotone reward function). If two vectors x, x′ ∈ [0, 1]m satisfy xi ≤ x′i (∀i ∈
[m]), then for any S ∈ F , we have R(x, S) ≤ R(x′ , S).
Computation Oracle for Discrete Distributions with Finite Supports. We require that there
exists an α-approximation computation oracle (0 < α ≤ 1) for maximizing rD (S), when each Di
(i ∈ [m]) has a finite support. In this case, Di can be fully described by a finite set of numbers
(i.e., its support {vi,1 , vi,2 , . . . , vi,si } and the values of its cumulative distribution function (CDF)
Fi on the supported points: Fi (vi,j ) = PrXi ∼Di [Xi ≤ vi,j ] (j ∈ [si ])). The oracle takes such a
representation of D as input, and can output a super arm S ′ = Oracle(D) ∈ F such that rD (S ′ ) ≥
α · maxS∈F {rD (S)}.
3 SDCB Algorithm
[0, 1]S is isomorphic to [0, 1]|S| ; the coordinates in [0, 1]S are indexed by elements in S.
Note that StA may be random due to the random outcomes in previous rounds and the possible randomness
used by A.
3
4
4
Algorithm 1 SDCB (Stochastically dominant confidence bound)
1: Throughout the algorithm, for each arm i ∈ [m], maintain: (i) a counter Ti which stores the
number of times arm i has been played so far, and (ii) the empirical distribution D̂i of the
observed outcomes from arm i so far, which is represented by its CDF F̂i
2: // Initialization
3: for i = 1 to m do
4:
// Action in the i-th round
5:
Play a super arm Si that contains arm i
6:
Update Tj and F̂j for each j ∈ Si
7: end for
8: for t = m + 1, m + 2, . . . do
9:
// Action in the t-th round
10:
For each i ∈ [m], let Di be a distribution whose CDF Fi is
Fi (x) =
(
max{F̂i (x) −
1,
q
3 ln t
2Ti , 0},
0≤x<1
x=1
11:
Play the super arm St ← Oracle(D), where D = D1 × D2 × · · · × Dm
12:
Update Tj and F̂j for each j ∈ St
13: end for
We present our algorithm stochastically dominant confidence bound (SDCB) in Algorithm 1.
Throughout the algorithm, we store, in a variable Ti , the number of times the outcomes from arm i
are observed so far. We also maintain the empirical distribution D̂i of the observed outcomes from
arm i so far, which can be represented by its CDF F̂i : for x ∈ [0, 1], the value of F̂i (x) is just the
fraction of the observed outcomes from arm i that are no larger than x. Note that F̂i is always a
step function which has “jumps” at the points that are observed outcomes from arm i. Therefore
it suffices to store these discrete points as well as the values of F̂i at these points in order to store
the whole function F̂i . Similarly, the later computation of stochastically dominant CDF Fi (line 10)
only requires computation at these points, and the input to the offline oracle only needs to provide
these points and corresponding CDF values (line 11).
The algorithm starts with m initialization rounds in which each arm is played at least once5 (lines 27). In the t-th round (t > m), the algorithm consists of three steps. First, it calculates for each
i ∈ [m] a distribution Di whose CDF Fi is obtained by lowering the CDF F̂i (line 10). The
second step is to call the α-approximation oracle with the newly constructed distribution D =
D1 × · · · × Dm as input (line 11), and thus the super arm St output by the oracle satisfies rD (St ) ≥
α·maxS∈F {rD (S)}. Finally, the algorithm chooses the super arm St to play, observes the outcomes
from all arms in St , and updates Tj ’s and F̂j ’s accordingly for each j ∈ St .
The idea behind our algorithm is the optimism in the face of uncertainty principle, which is the key
principle behind UCB-type algorithms. Our algorithm ensures that with high probability we have
Fi (x) ≤ Fi (x) simultaneously for all i ∈ [m] and all x ∈ [0, 1], where Fi is the CDF of the outcome
distribution Di . This means that each Di has first-order stochastic dominance over Di .6 Then from
the monotonicity property of R(x, S) (Assumption 3) we know that rD (S) ≥ rD (S) holds for all
S ∈ F with high probability. Therefore D provides an “optimistic” estimation on the expected
reward from each super arm.
√
Regret Bounds. We prove O(log T ) distribution-dependent and O( T log T ) distributionindependent upper bounds on the regret of SDCB (Algorithm 1).
5
Without loss of generality, we assume that each arm i ∈ [m] is contained in at least one super arm.
We remark that while Fi (x) is a numerical lower confidence bound on Fi (x) for all x ∈ [0, 1], at the
distribution level, Di serves as a “stochastically dominant (upper) confidence bound” on Di .
6
5
We call a super arm S bad if rD (S) < α · rD (S ∗ ). For each super arm S, we define
∆S = max{α · rD (S ∗ ) − rD (S), 0}.
Let FB = {S ∈ F | ∆S > 0}, which is the set of all bad super arms. Let EB ⊆ [m] be the set of
arms that are contained in at least one bad super arm. For each i ∈ EB , we define
∆i,min = min{∆S | S ∈ FB , i ∈ S}.
Recall that M is an upper bound on the reward value (Assumption 2) and K = maxS∈F |S|.
Theorem 1. A distribution-dependent upper bound on the α-approximation regret of SDCB (Algorithm 1) in T rounds is
2
X 2136
π
2
M K
ln T +
+ 1 αM m,
∆i,min
3
i∈EB
and a distribution-independent upper bound is
√
93M mKT ln T +
π2
+ 1 αM m.
3
The proof of Theorem 1 is given in Appendix A.1. The main idea is to reduce our analysis on general
reward functions satisfying
Assumptions 1-3 to the one in [18] that deals with the summation reward
P
function R(x, S) = i∈S xi . Our analysis relies on the Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality [10,
24], which gives a uniform concentration bound on the empirical CDF of a distribution.
Applying Our Algorithm to the Previous CMAB Framework. Although our focus is on general
reward functions, we note that when SDCB is applied to the previous CMAB framework where the
expected reward depends only on the means of the random variables, it can achieve the same regret
bounds as the previous combinatorial upper confidence bound (CUCB) algorithm in [8, 18].
Let µi = EX∼D [Xi ] be arm i’s mean outcome. In each round CUCB calculates (for each arm i) an
upper confidence bound µ̄i on µi , with the essential property that µi ≤ µ̄i ≤ µi +Λi holds with high
probability, for some Λi > 0. In SDCB, we use Di as a stochastically dominant confidence bound
of Di . We can show that µi ≤ EYi ∼Di [Yi ] ≤ µi + Λi holds with high probability, with the same
interval length Λi as in CUCB. (The proof is given in Appendix A.2.) Hence, the analysis in [8, 18]
can be applied to SDCB, resulting in the same regret bounds.We further remark that in this case we
do not need the three assumptions stated in Section 2 (in particular the independence assumption on
Xi ’s): the summation reward case just works as in [18] and the nonlinear reward case relies on the
properties of monotonicity and bounded smoothness used in [8].
4 Improved SDCB Algorithm by Discretization
In Section 3, we have shown that our algorithm SDCB achieves near-optimal regret bounds. However,
that algorithm might suffer from large running time and memory usage. Note that, in the t-th round,
an arm i might have been observed t − 1 times already, and it is possible that all the observed values
from arm i are different (e.g., when arm i’s outcome distribution Di is continuous). In such case,
it takes Θ(t) space to store the empirical CDF F̂i of the observed outcomes from arm i, and both
calculating the stochastically dominant CDF Fi and updating F̂i take Θ(t) time. Therefore, the
worst-case space usage of SDCB in T rounds is Θ(T ), and the worst-case running time is Θ(T 2 )
(ignoring the dependence on m and K); here we do not count the time and space used by the offline
computation oracle.
In this section, we propose an improved
algorithm Lazy-SDCB which reduces the worst-case
√
√ mem3/2
ory usage and running time to O( T ) and O(T ), respectively, while preserving the O( T log T )
distribution-independent regret bound. To this end, we need an additional assumption on the reward
function:
Assumption 4 (Lipschitz-continuous reward function). There exists C > 0 such that for any S ∈ F
′
′
m
′
′
and
P any x, x ′ ∈ [0, 1] , we have |R(x, S) − R(x , S)| ≤ CkxS − xS k1 , where kxS − xS k1 =
|x
−
x
|.
i
i
i∈S
6
Algorithm 2 Lazy-SDCB with known time horizon
Input: time
√ horizon T
1: s ← ⌈ T ⌉
1
j=1
[0, s ],
2: Ij ←
j−1 j
( s , s ], j = 2, . . . , s
3: Invoke SDCB (Algorithm 1) for T rounds, with the following change: whenever observing an
outcome x (from any arm), find j ∈ [s] such that x ∈ Ij , and regard this outcome as sj
Algorithm 3 Lazy-SDCB without knowing the time horizon
1: q ← ⌈log2 m⌉
2: In rounds 1, 2, . . . , 2q , invoke Algorithm 2 with input T = 2q
3: for k = q, q + 1, q + 2, . . . do
4:
In rounds 2k + 1, 2k + 2, . . . , 2k+1 , invoke Algorithm 2 with input T = 2k
5: end for
We first describe the algorithm when the time horizon T is known in advance. The algorithm is
summarized in Algorithm 2. We perform a discretization on the distribution D = D1 × · · · × Dm
to obtain a discrete distribution D̃ = D̃1 × · · · × D̃m such that (i) for X̃ ∼ D̃, X̃1 , . . . , X̃m
are also mutually independent, and (ii)
√ every D̃i is supported on a set of equally-spaced values
{ 1s , 2s , . . . , 1}, where s is set to be ⌈ T ⌉. Specifically, we partition [0, 1] into s intervals: I1 =
s−1
s−1
[0, 1s ], I2 = ( 1s , 2s ], . . . , Is−1 = ( s−2
s , s ], Is = ( s , 1], and define D̃i as
Pr [X̃i = j/s] =
X̃i ∼D̃i
Pr [Xi ∈ Ij ] ,
Xi ∼Di
j = 1, . . . , s.
For the CMAB problem ([m], F , D, R), our algorithm “pretends” that the outcomes are drawn from
D̃ instead of D, by replacing any outcome x ∈ Ij by js (∀j ∈ [s]), and then applies SDCB to the
problem ([m], F , D̃, R). Since each D̃i has a known support { 1s , 2s , . . . , 1}, the algorithm only
needs to maintain the number of occurrences of each support value in order to obtain the empirical
CDF of all the observed
outcomes from arm i. Therefore, all the operations in a round can be done
√
using O(s)
=
O(
T
)
time
and space, and the total time and space used by Lazy-SDCB are O(T 3/2 )
√
and O( T ), respectively.
The discretization parameter s in Algorithm 2 depends on the time horizon T , which is why Algorithm 2 has to know T in advance. We can use the doubling trick to avoid the dependency on T . We
present such an algorithm (without knowing T ) in Algorithm 3. It is easy to see that Algorithm 3
has the same asymptotic time and space usages as Algorithm 2.
√
Regret Bounds. We show that both Algorithm 2 and Algorithm 3 achieve O( T log T )
distribution-independent regret bounds. The full proofs are given in Appendix B. Recall that C
is the coefficient in the Lipschitz condition in Assumption 4.
Theorem 2. Suppose the time horizon T is known in advance. Then the α-approximation regret of
Algorithm 2 in T rounds is at most
2
√
√
π
+ 1 αM m.
93M mKT ln T + 2CK T +
3
Proof Sketch. The regret consists of two parts: (i) the regret for the discretized CMAB problem
([m], F , D̃, R), and (ii) the error due to discretization. We directly apply Theorem 1 for the first
part. For the second part, a key step is to show |rD (S) − rD̃ (S)| ≤ CK/s for all S ∈ F (see
Appendix B.1).
Theorem 3. For any time horizon T ≥ 2, the α-approximation regret of Algorithm 3 in T rounds is
at most
√
√
318M mKT ln T + 7CK T + 10αM m ln T.
7
5 Applications
We describe the K-MAX problem and the class of expected utility maximization problems as applications of our general CMAB framework.
The K-MAX Problem. In this problem, the player is allowed to select at most K arms from the
set of m arms in each round, and the reward is the maximum one among
the outcomes from the
selected arms. In other words, the set of feasible super arms is F = S ⊆ [m] |S| ≤ K , and
the reward function is R(x, S) = maxi∈S xi . It is easy to verify that this reward function satisfies
Assumptions 2, 3 and 4 with M = C = 1.
Now we consider the corresponding offline K-MAX problem of selecting at most K arms from
m independent arms, with the largest expected reward. It can be implied by a result in [14] that
finding the exact optimal solution is NP-hard, so we resort to approximation algorithms. We can
show, using submodularity, that a simple greedy algorithm can achieve a (1 − 1/e)-approximation.
Furthermore, we give the first PTAS for this problem. Our PTAS can be generalized to constraints
other than the cardinality constraint |S| ≤ K, including s-t simple paths, matchings, knapsacks, etc.
The algorithms and corresponding proofs are given in Appendix C.
Theorem 4. There exists a PTAS for the offline K-MAX problem. In other words, for any constant
ǫ > 0, there is a polynomial-time (1 − ǫ)-approximation algorithm for the offline K-MAX problem.
We thus can apply our SDCB√algorithm to the K-MAX bandit problem and obtain O(log T )
distribution-dependent and Õ( T ) distribution-independent
regret bounds according to Theorem 1,
√
or can apply Lazy-SDCB to get Õ( T ) distribution-independent bound according to Theorem 2
or 3.
Streeter and Golovin [26] study an online submodular maximization problem in the oblivious adversary model. In particular,
their result can cover the stochastic K-MAX bandit problem as a special
√
case, and an O(K mT log m) upper bound on the (1 − 1/e)-regret can be shown. While the techniques in [26] can√only give a bound on the (1 − 1/e)-approximation regret for K-MAX, we can
obtain the first Õ( T ) bound on the (1 − ǫ)-approximation regret for any constant ǫ > 0, using our
PTAS as the offline oracle. Even when we use the simple greedy algorithm as the oracle, our experiments show that SDCB performs significantly better than the algorithm in [26] (see Appendix D).
Expected Utility Maximization.
Our framework can also be applied to reward functions of the
P
utility function. The corresponding offline
form R(x, S) = u( i∈S xi ), where u(·) is an increasing
P
problem is to maximize the expected utility E[u( i∈S xi )] subject to a feasibility constraint S ∈ F .
Note that if u is nonlinear, the expected utility may not be a function of the means of the arms in
S. Following the celebrated von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theorem, nonlinear utility
functions have been extensively used to capture risk-averse or risk-prone behaviors in economics
(see e.g., [11]), while linear utility functions correspond to risk-neutrality.
Li and Deshpande [20] obtain a PTAS for the expected utility maximization (EUM) problem for several classes of utility functions (including for example increasing concave functions which typically
indicate risk-averseness), and a large class of feasibility constraints (including cardinality constraint,
s-t simple paths, matchings, and knapsacks). Similar results for other utility functions and feasibility constraints can be found in [27, 21, 4]. In the online problem, we can apply our algorithms,
using their PTASs as the offline oracle. Again, we can obtain the first tight regret bounds on the
(1 − ǫ)-approximation regret for any ǫ > 0, for the class of online EUM problems.
Acknowledgments
Wei Chen was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
61433014). Jian Li and Yu Liu were supported in part by the National Basic Research Program
of China grants 2015CB358700, 2011CBA00300, 2011CBA00301, and the National NSFC grants
61033001, 61361136003. The authors would like to thank Tor Lattimore for referring to us the
DKW inequality.
8
References
[1] Jean-Yves Audibert and Sébastien Bubeck. Minimax policies for adversarial and stochastic bandits. In
COLT, pages 217–226, 2009.
[2] Peter Auer, Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, and Paul Fischer. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem.
Machine learning, 47(2-3):235–256, 2002.
[3] Peter Auer, Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi, Yoav Freund, and Robert E. Schapire. The nonstochastic multiarmed
bandit problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(1):48–77, 2002.
[4] Anand Bhalgat and Sanjeev Khanna. A utility equivalence theorem for concave functions. In IPCO, pages
126–137. Springer, 2014.
[5] Sébastien Bubeck and Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi. Regret analysis of stochastic and nonstochastic multi-armed
bandit problems. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning, 5(1):1–122, 2012.
[6] Nicolo Cesa-Bianchi and Gábor Lugosi. Combinatorial bandits. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 78(5):1404–1422, 2012.
[7] Shouyuan Chen, Tian Lin, Irwin King, Michael R. Lyu, and Wei Chen. Combinatorial pure exploration
of multi-armed bandits. In NIPS, 2014.
[8] Wei Chen, Yajun Wang, Yang Yuan, and Qinshi Wang. Combinatorial multi-armed bandit and its extension to probabilistically triggered arms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(50):1–33, 2016.
[9] Richard Combes, M. Sadegh Talebi, Alexandre Proutiere, and Marc Lelarge. Combinatorial bandits
revisited. In NIPS, 2015.
[10] Aryeh Dvoretzky, Jack Kiefer, and Jacob Wolfowitz. Asymptotic minimax character of the sample distribution function and of the classical multinomial estimator. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, pages
642–669, 1956.
[11] P. C. Fishburn. The foundations of expected utility. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982.
[12] Yi Gai, Bhaskar Krishnamachari, and Rahul Jain. Combinatorial network optimization with unknown
variables: Multi-armed bandits with linear rewards and individual observations. IEEE/ACM Transactions
on Networking, 20(5):1466–1478, 2012.
[13] Ashish Goel, Sudipto Guha, and Kamesh Munagala. Asking the right questions: Model-driven optimization using probes. In PODS, pages 203–212. ACM, 2006.
[14] Ashish Goel, Sudipto Guha, and Kamesh Munagala. How to probe for an extreme value. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 7(1):12:1–12:20, 2010.
[15] Aditya Gopalan, Shie Mannor, and Yishay mansour. Thompson sampling for complex online problems.
In ICML, pages 100–108, 2014.
[16] Branislav Kveton, Zheng Wen, Azin Ashkan, Hoda Eydgahi, and Brian Eriksson. Matroid bandits: Fast
combinatorial optimization with learning. In UAI, pages 420–429, 2014.
[17] Branislav Kveton, Zheng Wen, Azin Ashkan, and Csaba Szepesvári. Combinatorial cascading bandits. In
NIPS, 2015.
[18] Branislav Kveton, Zheng Wen, Azin Ashkan, and Csaba Szepesvári. Tight regret bounds for stochastic
combinatorial semi-bandits. In AISTATS, pages 535–543, 2015.
[19] Tze Leung Lai and Herbert Robbins. Asymptotically efficient adaptive allocation rules. Advances in
applied mathematics, 6(1):4–22, 1985.
[20] Jian Li and Amol Deshpande. Maximizing expected utility for stochastic combinatorial optimization
problems. In FOCS, pages 797–806, 2011.
[21] Jian Li and Wen Yuan. Stochastic combinatorial optimization via poisson approximation. In STOC, pages
971–980, 2013.
[22] Tian Lin, Bruno Abrahao, Robert Kleinberg, John Lui, and Wei Chen. Combinatorial partial monitoring
game with linear feedback and its applications. In ICML, pages 901–909, 2014.
[23] Tian Lin, Jian Li, and Wei Chen. Stochastic online greedy learning with semi-bandit feedbacks. In NIPS,
2015.
[24] Pascal Massart. The tight constant in the dvoretzky-kiefer-wolfowitz inequality. The Annals of Probability,
pages 1269–1283, 1990.
[25] George L. Nemhauser, Laurence A. Wolsey, and Marshall L. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for
maximizing submodular set functions – I. Mathematical Programming, 14(1):265–294, 1978.
[26] Matthew Streeter and Daniel Golovin. An online algorithm for maximizing submodular functions. In
NIPS, 2008.
[27] Jiajin Yu and Shabbir Ahmed. Maximizing expected utility over a knapsack constraint. Operations
Research Letters, 44(2):180–185, 2016.
9
Appendix
A
Missing Proofs from Section 3
A.1 Proof of Theorem 1
We present the proof of Theorem 1 in four steps. In Section A.1.1, we review the L1 distance
between two distributions and present a property of it. In Section A.1.2, we review the DvoretzkyKiefer-Wolfowitz (DKW) inequality, which is a strong concentration result for empirical CDFs. In
Section A.1.3, we prove some key technical lemmas. Then we complete the proof of Theorem 1 in
Section A.1.4.
A.1.1 The L1 Distance between Two Probability Distributions
For simplicity, we only consider discrete distributions with finite supports – this will be enough for
our purpose.
Let P be a probability distribution. For any x, let P (x) = PrX∼P [X = x]. We write P = P1 ×P2 ×
· · · × Pn if the (multivariate) random variable X ∼ P can be written as X = (X1 , X2 , . . . , Xn ),
where X1 , . . . , Xn are mutually independent and Xi ∼ Pi (∀i ∈ [n]).
For two distributions P and Q, their L1 distance is defined as
X
L1 (P, Q) =
|P (x) − Q(x)|,
x
where the summation is taken over x ∈ supp(P ) ∪ supp(Q).
The L1 distance has the following property. It is a folklore result and we provide a proof for completeness.
Lemma 1. Let P = P1 ×P2 ×· · ·×Pn and Q = Q1 ×Q2 ×· · ·×Qn be two probability distributions.
Then we have
n
X
L1 (Pi , Qi ).
(1)
L1 (P, Q) ≤
i=1
Proof. We prove (1) by induction on n.
When n = 2, we have
XX
L1 (P, Q) =
|P (x, y) − Q(x, y)|
x
=
x
≤
=
y
XX
y
XX
x
X
y
|P1 (x)P2 (y) − Q1 (x)Q2 (y)|
(|P1 (x)P2 (y) − P1 (x)Q2 (y)| + |P1 (x)Q2 (y) − Q1 (x)Q2 (y)|)
P1 (x)
x
X
y
|P2 (y) − Q2 (y)| +
= 1 · L1 (P2 , Q2 ) + 1 · L1 (P1 , Q1 )
=
2
X
X
y
Q2 (y)
X
x
|P1 (x) − Q1 (x)|
L1 (Pi , Qi ).
i=1
Here the summation is taken over x ∈ supp(P1 ) ∪ supp(Q1 ) and y ∈ supp(P2 ) ∪ supp(Q2 ).
Suppose (1) is proved for n = k − 1 (k ≥ 3). When n = k, using the results for n = k − 1 and
n = 2, we get
L1 (P, Q) ≤
k−2
X
i=1
L1 (Pi , Qi ) + L1 (Pk−1 × Pk , Qk−1 × Qk )
10
≤
=
k−2
X
L1 (Pi , Qi ) + L1 (Pk−1 , Qk−1 ) + L1 (Pk , Qk )
i=1
k
X
L1 (Pi , Qi ).
i=1
This completes the proof.
A.1.2 The DKW Inequality
Consider a distribution D with CDF F (x). Let F̂n (x) be the empirical CDF of n i.i.d. samples
Pn
X1 , . . . , Xn drawn from D, i.e., F̂n (x) = n1 i=1 1{Xi ≤ x} (x ∈ R).7 Then we have:
Lemma 2 (Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality [10, 24]). For any ǫ > 0 and any n ∈ Z+ , we
have
2
Pr sup F̂n (x) − F (x) ≥ ǫ ≤ 2e−2nǫ .
x∈R
h
i
Note that for any fixed x ∈ R, from the Chernoff bound we have Pr F̂n (x) − F (x) ≥ ǫ ≤
2
2e−2nǫ . The DKW inequality states a stronger guarantee that the Chernoff concentration holds
simultaneously for all x ∈ R.
A.1.3 Technical Lemmas
The following lemma describes some properties of the expected reward rP (S) = EX∼P [R(X, S)].
′
be two probability distributions over
Lemma 3. Let P = P1 × · · · × Pm and P ′ = P1′ × · · · × Pm
m
′
′
[0, 1] . Let Fi and Fi be the CDFs of Pi and Pi , respectively (i = 1, . . . , m). Suppose each Pi
(i ∈ [m]) is a discrete distribution with finite support.
(i) If for any i ∈ [m], x ∈ [0, 1] we have Fi′ (x) ≤ Fi (x), then for any super arm S ∈ F , we have
rP ′ (S) ≥ rP (S).
(ii) If for any i ∈ [m], x ∈ [0, 1] we have Fi (x) − Fi′ (x) ≤ Λi (Λi > 0), then for any super arm
S ∈ F , we have
X
rP ′ (S) − rP (S) ≤ 2M
Λi .
i∈S
Proof. It is easy to see why (i) is true. If we have Fi′ (x) ≤ Fi (x) for all i ∈ [m] and x ∈ [0, 1], then
for all i, Pi′ has first-order stochastic dominance over Pi . When we change the distribution from Pi
into Pi′ , we are moving some probability mass from smaller values to larger values. Recall that the
reward function R(x, S) has a monotonicity property (Assumption 3): if x and x′ are two vectors
in [0, 1]m such that xi ≤ x′i for all i ∈ [m], then R(x, S) ≤ R(x′ , S) for all S ∈ F . Therefore we
have rP (S) ≤ rP ′ (S) for all S ∈ F .
Now we prove (ii). Without loss of generality, we assume S = {1, 2, . . . , n} (n ≤ m). Let P ′′ =
′′
P1′′ × · · · × Pm
be a distribution over [0, 1]m such that the CDF of Pi′′ is the following:
max{Fi (x) − Λi , 0}, 0 ≤ x < 1,
′′
Fi (x) =
(2)
1,
x = 1.
It is easy to see that Fi′′ (x) ≤ Fi′ (x) for all i ∈ [m] and x ∈ [0, 1]. Thus from the result in (i) we
have
(3)
rP ′ (S) ≤ rP ′′ (S).
7
We use 1{·} to denote the indicator function, i.e., 1{H} = 1 if an event H happens, and 1{H} = 0 if it
does not happen.
11
Let supp(Pi ) = {vi,1 , vi,2 , . . . , vi,si } where 0 ≤ vi,1 < · · · < vi,si ≤ 1. Define PS = P1 × P2 ×
· · · × Pn , and define PS′ and PS′′ similarly. Recall that the reward function R(x, S) can be written as
RS (xS ) = RS (x1 , . . . , xn ). Then we have
rP ′′ (S) − rP (S)
X
X
RS (x1 , . . . , xn )PS (x1 , . . . , xn )
RS (x1 , . . . , xn )PS′′ (x1 , . . . , xn ) −
=
x1 ,...,xn
x1 ,...,xn
=
X
x1 ,...,xn
≤
X
x1 ,...,xn
RS (x1 , . . . , xn ) ·
(PS′′ (x1 , . . . , xn )
− PS (x1 , . . . , xn ))
M · |PS′′ (x1 , . . . , xn ) − PS (x1 , . . . , xn )|
= M · L1 (PS′′ , PS ),
where the summation is taken over xi ∈ {vi,1 , . . . , vi,si } (∀i ∈ S). Then using Lemma 1 we obtain
X
rP ′′ (S) − rP (S) ≤ M ·
L1 (Pi′′ , Pi ).
(4)
i∈S
′′
Now we give an upper bound on L1 (Pi′′ , Pi ) for each i. Let Fi,j = Fi (vi,j ), Fi,j
= Fi′′ (vi,j ), and
′′
Fi,0 = Fi,0 = 0. We have
L1 (Pi′′ , Pi ) =
si
X
j=1
=
=
si
X
j=1
si
X
j=1
|Pi′′ (vi,j ) − Pi (vi,j )|
′′
′′
(Fi,j
− Fi,j−1
) − (Fi,j − Fi,j−1 )
(5)
′′
′′
(Fi,j − Fi,j
) − (Fi,j−1 − Fi,j−1
) .
′′
′′
In fact, for all 1 ≤ j < si , we have Fi,j − Fi,j
≥ Fi,j−1 − Fi,j−1
. To see this, consider two cases:
′′
′′
= Fi,j−1
=
• If Fi,j < Λi , then we have Fi,j−1 ≤ Fi,j < Λi . By definition (2) we have Fi,j
′′
′′
0. Thus Fi,j − Fi,j = Fi,j ≥ Fi,j−1 = Fi,j−1 − Fi,j−1 .
′′
′′
• If Fi,j ≥ Λi , then by definition (2) we have Fi,j − Fi,j
= Λi ≥ Fi,j−1 − Fi,j−1
.
Therefore (5) becomes
L1 (Pi′′ , Pi ) =
sX
i −1
j=1
′′
′′
′′
(Fi,j − Fi,j
) − (Fi,j−1 − Fi,j−1
) + (1 − 1) − (Fi,si −1 − Fi,s
)
i −1
′′
′′
= Fi,si −1 − Fi,s
+ Fi,si −1 − Fi,s
i −1
i −1
′′
= 2 Fi,si −1 − Fi,s
i −1
(6)
≤ 2Λi ,
where the last inequality is due to (2).
We complete the proof of the lemma by combining (3), (4) and (6):
X
X
rP ′ (S) − rP (S) ≤ rP ′′ (S) − rP (S) ≤ M ·
L1 (Pi′′ , Pi ) ≤ 2M
Λi .
i∈S
i∈S
The following lemma is similar to Lemma 1 in [18]. We will use some additional notation:
• For t ≥ m + 1 and i ∈ [m], let Ti,t be the value of counter Ti right after the t-th round
of SDCB. In other words, Ti,t is the number of observed outcomes from arm i in the first t
rounds.
12
• Let St be the super arm selected by SDCB in the t-th round.
Lemma 4. Define an event in each round t (m + 1 ≤ t ≤ T ):
s
(
)
X
3 ln t
Ht = 0 < ∆St ≤ 4M ·
.
2Ti,t−1
(7)
i∈St
Then the α-approximation regret of SDCB in T rounds is at most
" T
#
X
π2
E
+ 1 αM m.
1{Ht }∆St +
3
t=m+1
Proof. Let Fi be the CDF of Di . Let F̂i,l be the empirical CDF of the first l observations from arm
i. For m + 1 ≤ t ≤ T , define an event
s
(
)
3 ln t
Et = there exists i ∈ [m] such that sup F̂i,Ti,t−1 (x) − Fi (x) ≥
,
2Ti,t−1
x∈[0,1]
which means that the empirical CDF F̂i is not close enough to the true CDF Fi at the beginning of
the t-th round.
Recall that we have S ∗ = argmaxS∈F {rD (S)} and ∆S = max{α · rD (S ∗ ) − rD (S), 0} (S ∈ F ).
We bound the α-approximation regret of SDCB as
RegSDCB
D,α (T ) =
T
X
t=1
=E
"
E [α · rD (S ∗ ) − rD (St )] ≤
m
X
#
∆St + E
t=1
"
where ¬Et is the complement of event Et .
T
X
t=m+1
T
X
E [∆St ]
t=1
#
1{Et }∆St + E
"
T
X
t=m+1
#
(8)
1{¬Et }∆St ,
We separately bound each term in (8).
(a) the first term
The first term in (8) can be trivially bounded as
"m
#
m
X
X
E
α · rD (S ∗ ) ≤ m · αM.
∆St ≤
(9)
t=1
t=1
(b) the second term
By the DKW inequality we know that for any i ∈ [m], l ≥ 1, t ≥ m + 1 we have
#
"
r
3 ln t
3 ln t
≤ 2e−2l· 2l = 2e−3 ln t = 2t−3 .
Pr sup F̂i,l (x) − Fi (x) ≥
2l
x∈[0,1]
Therefore
E
"
T
X
t=m+1
#
1{Et } ≤
≤
T
m X
t−1
X
X
t=m+1 i=1 l=1
T
m X
t−1
X
X
t=m+1 i=1 l=1
≤ 2m
≤
T
X
t−2
t=m+1
π2
m,
3
13
Pr
"
2t−3
F̂i,j,l − Fi,j ≥
r
3 ln t
2l
#
and then the second term in (8) can be bounded as
" T
#
X
π2
π2
E
1{Et }∆St ≤
m · (α · rD (S ∗ )) ≤
αM m.
3
3
t=m+1
(10)
(c) the third term
q
3 ln t
We fix t > m and first assume ¬Et happens. Let ci =
2Ti,t−1 for each i ∈ [m]. Since ¬Et
happens, we have
F̂i,Ti,t−1 (x) − Fi (x) < ci
∀i ∈ [m], x ∈ [0, 1].
(11)
Recall that in round t of SDCB (Algorithm 1), the input to the oracle is D = D1 × · · · × Dm , where
the CDF Fi of Di is
0 ≤ x < 1,
max{F̂i,Ti,t−1 (x) − ci , 0},
Fi (x) =
(12)
1,
x = 1.
From (11) and (12) we know that Fi (x) ≤ Fi (x) ≤ Fi (x) + 2ci for all i ∈ [m], x ∈ [0, 1]. Thus,
from Lemma 3 (i) we have
rD (S) ≤ rD (S)
∀S ∈ F ,
(13)
and from Lemma 3 (ii) we have
rD (S) ≤ rD (S) + 2M
X
2ci
i∈S
∀S ∈ F .
(14)
Also, from the fact that the algorithm chooses St in the t-th round, we have
rD (St ) ≥ α · max{rD (S)} ≥ α · rD (S ∗ ).
(15)
S∈F
From (13), (14) and (15) we have
α · rD (S ∗ ) ≤ α · rD (S ∗ ) ≤ rD (St ) ≤ rD (St ) + 2M
X
2ci ,
i∈St
which implies
∆St ≤ 4M
X
ci .
i∈St
P
Therefore, when ¬Et happens, we always have ∆St ≤ 4M i∈St ci . In other words,
s
)
(
X
3 ln t
.
¬Et =⇒ ∆St ≤ 4M
2Ti,t−1
i∈St
This implies
{¬Et , ∆St > 0} =⇒
(
0 < ∆St ≤ 4M
X
i∈St
s
3 ln t
2Ti,t−1
)
= Ht .
Hence, the third term in (8) can be bounded as
" T
#
" T
#
" T
#
X
X
X
E
1{¬Et }∆St = E
1{¬Et , ∆St > 0}∆St ≤ E
1{Ht }∆St .
t=m+1
t=m+1
t=m+1
Finally, by combining (8), (9), (10) and (16) we have
" T
#
X
π2
SDCB
RegD,α (T ) ≤ E
1{Ht }∆St +
+ 1 αM m,
3
t=m+1
completing the proof of the lemma.
14
(16)
A.1.4 Finishing the Proof of Theorem 1
Lemma 4 is very similar to Lemma 1 in [18]. We now apply the counting argument in [18] to finish
the proof of Theorem 1.
hP
i
T
From Lemma 4 we know that it remains to bound E
t=m+1 1{Ht }∆St , where Ht is defined
in (7).
Define two decreasing sequences of positive constants
1 = β0 >β1 > β2 > . . .
α1 > α2 > . . .
such that limk→∞ αk = limk→∞ βk = 0. We choose {αk } and {βk } as in Theorem 4 of [18],
which satisfy
∞
√ X
βk−1 − βk
6
≤1
(17)
√
αk
k=1
and
∞
X
αk
k=1
βk
< 267.
For t ∈ {m + 1, . . . , T } and k ∈ Z+ , let
(
2
ln T
αk 2MK
∆St
mk,t =
+∞
(18)
∆St > 0,
∆St = 0,
and
Ak,t = {i ∈ St | Ti,t−1 ≤ mk,t }.
Then we define an event
Gk,t = {|Ak,t | ≥ βk K},
which means “in the t-th round, at least βk K arms in St had been observed at most mk,t times.”
Lemma 5. In the t-th round (m + 1 ≤ t ≤ T ), if event Ht happens, then there exists k ∈ Z+ such
that event Gk,t happens.
Proof. Assume that Ht happens and that none of G1,t , G2,t , . . . happens. Then |Ak,t | < βk K for all
k ∈ Z+ .
Let A0,t = St and Āk,t = St \ Ak,t for k ∈ Z+ ∪{0}. It is easy to see Āk−1,t ⊆ Āk,t for all k ∈ Z+ .
Note that limk→∞
exists N ∈ Z+ such that Āk,t = St for all k ≥ N , and then
S∞mk,t = 0. Thus there
we have St = k=1 Āk,t \ Āk−1,t . Finally, note that for all i ∈ Āk,t , we have Ti,t−1 > mk,t .
Therefore
∞
X
i∈St
X
1
p
=
Ti,t−1 k=1
∞
X
∞
X
i∈Āk,t \Āk−1,t
X
1
p
≤
Ti,t−1
k=1
∞
X
X
i∈Āk,t \Āk−1,t
1
√
mk,t
∞
Āk,t \ Āk−1,t
|Ak−1,t \ Ak,t | X |Ak−1,t | − |Ak,t |
=
=
√
√
√
mk,t
mk,t
mk,t
k=1
k=1
k=1
∞
X
1
|St |
1
+
|Ak,t | √
=√
−√
m1,t
mk+1,t
mk,t
k=1
∞
X
K
1
1
<√
+
βk K √
−√
m1,t
mk+1,t
mk,t
=
k=1
∞
X
(βk−1 − βk )K
=
.
√
mk,t
k=1
15
Note that we assume Ht happens. Then we have
s
X
X
√
1
3 ln t
p
∆St ≤ 4M ·
≤ 2M 6 ln T ·
2Ti,t−1
Ti,t−1
i∈S
i∈S
t
t
∞
∞
X
√
√ X
(βk−1 − βk )K
βk−1 − βk
=
· ∆St ≤ ∆St ,
6
< 2M 6 ln T ·
√
√
mk,t
αk
k=1
k=1
where the last inequality is due to (17). We reach a contradiction here. The proof of the lemma is
completed.
By Lemma 5 we have
T
X
t=m+1
∞
T
X
X
1{Ht }∆St ≤
1{Gk,t , ∆St > 0}∆St .
k=1 t=m+1
For i ∈ [m], k ∈ Z+ , t ∈ {m + 1, . . . , T }, define an event
Gi,k,t = Gk,t ∧ {i ∈ St , Ti,t−1 ≤ mk,t }.
Then by the definitions of Gk,t and Gi,k,t we have
1{Gk,t , ∆St > 0} ≤
Therefore
T
X
t=m+1
1{Ht }∆St ≤
1 X
1{Gi,k,t , ∆St > 0}.
βk K
i∈EB
∞
T
X X
X
1{Gi,k,t , ∆St > 0}
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1
∆St
.
βk K
B
B
B
For each arm i ∈ EB , suppose i is contained in Ni bad super arms Si,1
, Si,2
, . . . , Si,N
. Let ∆i,l =
i
∆Si,l
B (l ∈ [Ni ]). Without loss of generality, we assume ∆i,1 ≥ ∆i,2 ≥ . . . ≥ ∆i,Ni . Note that
2
= 0. Then we
∆i,Ni = ∆i,min . For convenience, we also define ∆i,0 = +∞, i.e., αk 2MK
∆i,0
have
T
X
t=m+1
≤
≤
=
1{Ht }∆St
Ni
T
∞
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1
Ni
∞
T
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1
Ni
∞
T
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1
=
B
1{Gi,k,t , St = Si,l
}
B
1{Ti,t−1 ≤ mk,t , St = Si,l
}
(
1 Ti,t−1 ≤ αk
Ni X
∞
T
l
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1 j=1
≤
≤
≤
Ni X
∞
T
l
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1 j=1
Ni X
Ni
∞
T
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 l=1 j=1
Ni
∞
T
X X
X
X
i∈EB k=1 t=m+1 j=1
∆St
βk K
(
2M K
∆i,l
(
1 αk
2M K
∆i,j−1
2
(
1 αk
2M K
∆i,j−1
2
(
2M K
∆i,j−1
2
1 αk
1 αk
2M K
∆i,j−1
2
2
∆i,l
βk K
B
ln T, St = Si,l
)
∆i,l
βk K
B
ln T, St = Si,l
)
∆i,l
βk K
ln T, St =
B
Si,l
)
∆i,j
βk K
2
ln T, St =
B
Si,l
)
∆i,j
βk K
ln T
)
ln T < Ti,t−1 ≤ αk
2M K
∆i,j
2
ln T < Ti,t−1 ≤ αk
2M K
∆i,j
2
ln T < Ti,t−1 ≤ αk
2M K
∆i,j
ln T < Ti,t−1 ≤ αk
16
2M K
∆i,j
2
∆i,j
βk K
≤
Ni
∞ X
X X
αk
i∈EB k=1 j=1
∞
X
αk
2M K
∆i,j
2
ln T − αk
2M K
∆i,j−1
2
Ni
X X
!
1
1
ln T ·
− 2
=4M K
2
βk
∆i,j
∆i,j−1
i∈EB j=1
k=1
!
Ni
X X
1
1
≤1068M 2K ln T ·
∆i,j ,
2 − ∆2
∆
i,j
i,j−1
j=1
2
ln T
!
!
∆i,j
βk K
∆i,j
i∈EB
where the last inequality is due to (18).
Finally, for each i ∈ EB we have
Ni
X
1
1
− 2
∆2i,j
∆i,j−1
j=1
!
∆i,j =
≤
1
∆i,Ni
1
∆i,Ni
+
N
i −1
X
j=1
+
Z
1
(∆i,j − ∆i,j+1 )
∆2i,j
∆i,1
∆i,Ni
2
1
dx
x2
1
−
∆i,Ni
∆i,1
2
.
<
∆i,min
=
It follows that
T
X
t=m+1
1{Ht }∆St ≤ 1068M 2K ln T ·
X
i∈EB
2
∆i,min
= M 2K
X 2136
ln T.
∆i,min
(19)
i∈EB
Combining (19) with Lemma 4, the distribution-dependent regret bound in Theorem 1 is proved.
To prove the distribution-independent bound, we decompose
T
X
t=m+1
1{Ht }∆St =
T
X
t=m+1
≤ ǫT +
PT
1{Ht , ∆St ≤ ǫ}∆St +
T
X
t=m+1
T
X
1{Ht }∆St into two parts:
1{Ht , ∆St > ǫ}∆St
t=m+1
(20)
1{Ht , ∆St > ǫ}∆St ,
t=m+1
where ǫ > 0 is a constant to be determined. The second term can be bounded in the same way as in
the proof of the distribution-dependent regret bound, except that we only consider the case ∆St > ǫ.
Thus we can replace (19) by
T
X
t=m+1
1{Ht , ∆St > ǫ}∆St ≤ M 2 K
It follows that
T
X
t=m+1
Finally, letting ǫ =
q
T
X
i∈EB ,∆i,min >ǫ
2136
2136
ln T ≤ M 2 Km
ln T.
∆i,min
ǫ
1{Ht }∆St ≤ ǫT + M 2 Km
2136M 2 Km ln T
T
t=m+1
X
(21)
2136
ln T.
ǫ
, we get
√
√
1{Ht }∆St ≤ 2 2136M 2KmT ln T < 93M mKT ln T .
Combining this with Lemma 4, we conclude the proof of the distribution-independent regret bound
in Theorem 1.
17
Algorithm 4 CUCB [8, 18]
1: For each arm i, maintain: (i) µ̂i , the average of all observed outcomes from arm i so far, and (ii)
Ti , the number of observed outcomes from arm i so far.
2: // Initialization
3: for i = 1 to m do
4:
// Action in the i-th round
5:
Play a super arm Si that contains arm i, and update µ̂i and Ti .
6: end for
7: for t = m + 1, m + 2, . . . do
8:
// Action in the t-th
q round
ln t
9:
µ̄i ← min{µ̂i + 32T
, 1}
i
∀i ∈ [m]
10:
Play the super arm St ← Oracle(µ̄), where µ̄ = (µ̄1 , . . . , µ̄m ).
11:
Update µ̂i and Ti for all i ∈ St .
12: end for
A.2 Analysis of Our Algorithm in the Previous CMAB Framework
We now give an analysis of SDCB in the previous CMAB framework, following our discussion in
Section 3. We consider the case in which the expected reward only depends on the means of the
random variables. Namely, rD (S) only depends on µi ’s (i ∈ S), where µi is arm i’s mean outcome.
In this case, we can rewrite rD (S) as rµ (S), where µ = (µ1 , . . . , µm ) is the vector of means. Note
that the offline computation oracle only needs a mean vector as input.
We no longer need the three assumptions (Assumptions 1-3) given in Section 2. In particular, we do
not require independence among outcome distributions of all arms (Assumption 1). Although we
cannot write D as D = D1 × · · · × Dm , we still let Di be the outcome distribution of arm i. In this
case, Di is the marginal distribution of D in the i-th component.
We summarize the CUCB algorithm [8, 18] in Algorithm 4. It maintains the empirical mean µ̂i of the
outcomes from each arm i, and stores the number of observed outcomes from arm i in a variable Ti .
In each round, it calculates an upper confidence bound (UCB) µ̄i of µi , Then it uses the UCB vector
µ̄ as the input to the oracle, and plays the super arm output by the oracle. In the t-th round (t > m),
each UCB µ̄i has the key property that
s
3 ln t
µi ≤ µ̄i ≤ µi + 2
(22)
2Ti,t−1
holds with high probability. (Recall
q that Ti,t−1 is the value of Ti after t − 1 rounds.) To see this,
ln t
with high probability (by Chernoff bound), and then (22)
note that we have |µi − µ̂i | ≤ 2T3i,t−1
follows from the definition of µ̄i in line 9 of Algorithm 4.
We prove that the same property as (22) also holds for SDCB. Consider a fixed t > m, and let
D = D1 × · · · × Dm be the input to the oracle in the t-th round of SDCB. Let νi = EYi ∼Di [Yi ]. We
can think that SDCB uses the mean vector ν = (ν1 , . . . , νm ) as the input to the oracle used by CUCB.
We now show that for each i, we have
s
3 ln t
µi ≤ ν i ≤ µi + 2
(23)
2Ti,t−1
with high probability.
To show (23), we first prove the following lemma.
Lemma 6. Let P and P ′ be two distributions over [0, 1] with CDFs F and F ′ , respectively. Consider
two random variables Y ∼ P and Y ′ ∼ P ′ .
(i) If for all x ∈ [0, 1] we have F ′ (x) ≤ F (x), then we have E[Y ] ≤ E[Y ′ ].
(ii) If for all x ∈ [0, 1] we have F (x) − F ′ (x) ≤ Λ (Λ > 0), then we have E[Y ′ ] ≤ E[Y ] + Λ.
18
Proof. We have
E[Y ] =
Z
1
x dF (x) = (xF (x))
0
1
0
−
Z
1
0
F (x) dx = 1 −
Z
1
F (x) dx.
0
Similarly, we have
′
E[Y ] = 1 −
Then the lemma holds trivially.
Z
1
F ′ (x) dx.
0
Now we prove (23). According to the DKW inequality, with high probability we have
s
3 ln t
≤ Fi (x) ≤ Fi (x)
Fi (x) − 2
2Ti,t−1
(24)
for all i ∈ [m] and x ∈ [0, 1], where Fi is the CDF of Di used in round t of SDCB, and Fi is
the CDF of Di . Suppose (24) holds for all i, x, then
qfor any i, the two distributions Di and Di
ln t
satisfy the two conditions in Lemma 6, with Λ = 2 2T3i,t−1
; then from Lemma 6 we know that
q
ln t
µi ≤ νi ≤ µi + 2 2T3i,t−1
. Hence we have shown that (23) holds with high probability.
The fact that (23) holds with high probability means that the mean of Di is also a UCB of µi with
the same confidence as in CUCB. With this property, the analysis in [8, 18] can also be applied to
SDCB, resulting in exactly the same regret bounds.
B Missing Proofs from Section 4
B.1
Analysis of the Discretization Error
The following lemma gives an upper bound on the error due to discretization. Refer to Section 4 for
the definition of the discretized distribution D̃.
Lemma 7. For any S ∈ F , we have
|rD (S) − rD̃ (S)| ≤
CK
.
s
To prove Lemma 7, we show a slightly more general lemma which gives an upper bound on the
discretization error of the expectation of a Lipschitz continuous function.
Lemma 8. Let g(x) be a Lipschitz continuous function on P
[0, 1]n such that for any x, x′ ∈ [0, 1]n ,
′
′
′
we have |g(x) − g(x )| ≤ Ckx − x k1 , where kx − x k1 = ni=1 |xi − x′i |. Let P = P1 × · · · × Pn
be a probability distribution over [0, 1]n . Define another distribution P̃ = P̃1 × · · ·× P̃n over [0, 1]n
as follows: each P̃i (i ∈ [n]) takes values in { 1s , 2s , . . . , 1}, and
Pr [X̃i = j/s] = Pr [Xi ∈ Ij ] ,
X̃i ∼P̃i
Xi ∼Pi
j ∈ [s],
s−1
s−1
where I1 = [0, 1s ], I2 = ( 1s , 2s ], . . . , Is−1 = ( s−2
s , s ], Is = ( s , 1]. Then
EX∼P [g(X)] − EX̃∼P̃ [g(X̃)] ≤
C ·n
.
s
(25)
Proof. Throughout the proof, we consider X = (X1 , . . . , Xn ) ∼ P and X̃ = (X̃1 , . . . , X̃n ) ∼ P̃ .
Let vj =
j
s
(j = 0, 1, . . . , s) and
pi,j = Pr[X̃i = vj ] = Pr[Xi ∈ Ij ]
We prove (25) by induction on n.
19
i ∈ [n], j ∈ [s].
(1) When n = 1, we have
E[g(X1 )] =
X
j∈[s],p1,j >0
p1,j · E g(X1 ) X1 ∈ Ij .
(26)
Since g is continuous, for each j ∈ [s] such that p1,j > 0, there exists ξj ∈ [vj−1 , vj ] such that
E [g(X1 )|X1 ∈ Ij ] = g(ξj )
From the Lipschitz continuity of g we have
|g(vj ) − g(ξj )| ≤ C|vj − ξj | ≤ C|vj − vj−1 | =
C
.
s
Hence
E[g(X1 )] − E[g(X̃1 )] =
X
p1,j · E[g(X1 )|X1 ∈ Ij ] −
X
p1,j · g(ξj ) −
j∈[s],p1,j >0
=
j∈[s],p1,j >0
≤
≤
=
j∈[s],p1,j >0
X
p1,j · |g(ξj ) − g(vj )|
X
p1,j ·
j∈[s],p1,j >0
j∈[s],p1,j >0
C
.
s
X
X
j∈[s],p1,j >0
p1,j · g(vj )
p1,j · g(vj )
C
s
This proves (25) for n = 1.
(ii) Suppose (25) is correct for n = 1, 2, . . . , k − 1. Now we prove it for n = k (k ≥ 2).
We define two functions on [0, 1]k−1 :
h(x1 , . . . , xk−1 ) = EXk [g(x1 , . . . , xk−1 , Xk )]
and
h̃(x1 , . . . , xk−1 ) = EX̃k [g(x1 , . . . , xk−1 , X̃k )].
For any fixed x1 , . . . , xk−1 ∈ [0, 1], the function g(x1 , . . . , xk−1 , x) on x ∈ [0, 1] is Lipschitz
continuous. Therefore from the result for n = 1 we have
h(x1 , . . . , xk−1 ) − h̃(x1 , . . . , xk−1 ) ≤
20
C
s
∀x1 , . . . , xk−1 ∈ [0, 1].
Then we have
E[g(X)] − E[g(X̃)]
= EX1 ,...,Xk−1 [E[g(X)|X1 , . . . , Xk−1 ]] − E[g(X̃)]
= EX1 ,...,Xk−1 [h(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 )] − E[g(X̃)]
≤ EX1 ,...,Xk−1 [h(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 )] − EX1 ,...,Xk−1 [h̃(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 )]
+ EX1 ,...,Xk−1 [h̃(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 )] − E[g(X̃)]
h
i
≤ EX1 ,...,Xk−1 h(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 ) − h̃(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 )
+ EX1 ,...,Xk−1 ,X̃k [g(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 , X̃k )] − E[g(X̃)]
h
i
C
+ EX̃k E[g(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 , X̃k )|X̃k ] − E[g(X̃1 , . . . , X̃k−1 , X̃k )|X̃k ]
≤ EX1 ,...,Xk−1
s
h
i
C
≤ + EX̃k E[g(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 , X̃k )|X̃k ] − E[g(X̃1 , . . . , X̃k−1 , X̃k )|X̃k ]
s
X
C
= +
pk,j · E[g(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 , vj )] − E[g(X̃1 , . . . , X̃k−1 , vj )] .
s
j∈[s],pk,j >0
(27)
For any j ∈ [s], the function g(x1 , . . . , xk−1 , vj ) on (x1 , . . . , xk−1 ) ∈ [0, 1]
uous. Then from the induction hypothesis at n = k − 1, we have
E[g(X1 , . . . , Xk−1 , vj )] − E[g(X̃1 , . . . , X̃k−1 , vj )] ≤
k−1
C(k − 1)
s
is Lipschitz contin-
∀j ∈ [s].
(28)
From (27) and (28) we have
E[g(X)] − E[g(X̃)] ≤
C
+
s
X
j∈[s],pk,j >0
pk,j ·
C(k − 1)
s
C(k − 1)
C
+
s
s
Ck
.
=
s
=
This concludes the proof for n = k.
Now we prove Lemma 7.
Proof of Lemma 7. We have
rD (S) = EX∼D [R(X, S)] = EX∼D [RS (XS )] = EXS ∼DS [RS (XS )],
where XS = (Xi )i∈S and DS = (Di )i∈S . Similarly, we have
rD̃ (S) = EX̃S ∼D̃S [RS (X̃S )].
According to Assumption 4, the function RS defined on [0, 1]S is Lipschitz continuous. Then from
Lemma 8 we have
|rD (S) − rD̃ (S)| = EXS ∼DS [RS (XS )] − EX̃S ∼D̃S [RS (X̃S )] ≤
This completes the proof.
21
C·K
C · |S|
≤
.
s
s
B.2
Proof of Theorem 2
Proof of Theorem 2. Let S ∗ = argmaxS∈F {rD (S)} and S̃ ∗ = argmaxS∈F {rD̃ (S)} be the optimal super arms in problems ([m], F , D, R) and ([m], F , D̃, R), respectively. Suppose Algorithm 2
selects super arm St in the t-th round (1 ≤ t ≤ T ). Then its α-approximation regret is bounded as
Alg. 2
RegD,α
(T )
= T · α · rD (S ∗ ) −
T
X
E [rD (St )]
t=1
T
X
= T · α rD (S ∗ ) − rD̃ (S̃ ∗ ) +
E [rD̃ (St ) − rD (St )] +
t=1
≤ T · α (rD (S ∗ ) − rD̃ (S ∗ )) +
T
X
t=1
T · α · rD̃ (S̃ ∗ ) −
T
X
E [rD̃ (St )]
t=1
!
Alg. 1
(T ).
E [rD̃ (St ) − rD (St )] + RegD̃,α
where the inequality is due to rD̃ (S̃ ∗ ) ≥ rD̃ (S ∗ ).
Then from Lemma 7 and the distribution-independent bound in Theorem 1 we have
2
√
CK
CK
π
Alg. 2
+T ·
+ 93M mKT ln T +
+ 1 αM m
RegD,α (T ) ≤ T · α ·
s
s
3
2
√
CKT
π
(29)
≤2·
+ 93M mKT ln T +
+ 1 αM m
s
3
2
√
√
π
≤ 93M mKT ln T + 2CK T +
+ 1 αM m.
3
√
√
Here in the last two inequalities we have used α ≤ 1 and s = ⌈ T ⌉ ≥ T . The proof is completed.
B.3
Proof of Theorem 3
Proof of Theorem 3. Let n = ⌈log2 T ⌉. Then we have 2n−1 < T ≤ 2n .
If n ≤ q = ⌈log2 m⌉, then T ≤ 2m and the regret in T rounds is at most 2m · αM . The regret
bound holds trivially.
Now we assume n ≥ q + 1. Using Theorem 2, we have
Alg. 3
(T )
RegD,α
Alg. 3
≤ RegD,α (2n )
Alg. 2 q
= RegD,α
(2 ) +
n−1
X
2 k
RegAlg.
D,α (2 )
k=q
2
≤ RegAlg.
D,α (2m)
≤ 2m · αM +
+
n−1
X
Alg. 2 k
RegD,α
(2 )
k=q
n−1
X
k=q
2
√
√
π
k
k
k
+ 1 αM m
93M mK · 2 ln 2 + 2CK 2 +
3
2
n−1
X√
√
π
n−1
k
≤ 2αM m + 93M mK ln 2
+ 2CK ·
2 + (n − 1) ·
+ 1 αM m
3
k=1
2
√2n
√
π
n−1
+ 2CK · √
+
+ 3 (n − 1) · αM m
≤ 93M mK ln 2
3
2−1
√
2
√
2T
π
≤ 93M mK ln T + 2CK · √
+ 3 log2 T · αM m
+
3
2−1
22
Algorithm 5 Greedy-K-MAX
1: S ← ∅
2: for i = 1 to K do
3:
k ← argmaxj∈[m]\S rD (S ∪ {j})
4:
S ← S ∪ {k}
5: end for
Output: S
√
√
≤ 318M mKT ln T + 7CK T + 10αM m ln T.
C
The Offline K-MAX Problem
In this section, we consider the offline K-MAX problem. Recall that we have m independent random variables {Xi }i∈[m] . Xi follows the discrete distribution Di with support {vi,1 , . . . , vi,si } ⊂
[0, 1], and D = D1 × · · · × Dm is the joint distribution of X = (X1 , . . . , Xm ). Let pi,j = Pr[Xi =
vi,j ]. Define rD (S) = EX∼D [maxi∈S Xi ] and OPT = maxS:|S|=K rD (S). Our goal is to find
(in polynomial time) a subset S ⊆ [m] of cardinality K such that rD (S) ≥ α · OPT (for certain
constant α).
First, we show that rD (S) can be calculated in polynomial time given any S ⊆ [m]. Let
S = {iS
1 , i2 , . . . , in }. Note that for X ∼ D, maxi∈S Xi can only take values in the set
V (S) = i∈S supp(Di ). For any v ∈ V (S), we have
Pr max Xi = v
X∼D
i∈S
= Pr [Xi1 = v, Xi2 ≤ v, . . . , Xin ≤ v]
X∼D
+ Pr [Xi1 < v, Xi2 = v, Xi3 ≤ v, . . . , Xin ≤ v]
(30)
X∼D
+ ···
+ Pr [Xi1 < v, . . . , Xin−1 < v, Xin = v].
X∼D
Since Xi1 , . . . , Xin are mutually independent, each probability appearing in (30) can be calculated
in polynomial time. Hence for any v ∈ V (S), PrX∼D [maxi∈S Xi = v] can be calculated in polynomial time using (30). Then rD (S) can be calculated by
X
v · Pr max Xi = v
rD (S) =
v∈V (S)
X∼D
i∈S
in polynomial time.
C.1 (1 − 1/e)-Approximation
We now show that a simple greedy algorithm (Algorithm 5) can find a (1 − 1/e)-approximate solution, by proving the submodularity of rD (S). In fact, this is implied by a slightly more general
result [13, Lemma 3.2]. We provide a simple and direct proof for completeness.
Lemma 9. Algorithm 5 can output a subset S such that rD (S) ≥ (1 − 1/e) · OPT.
Proof. For any x ∈ [0, 1]m , let fx (S) = maxi∈S xi be a set function defined on 2[m] . (Define
fx (∅) = 0.) We can verify that fx (S) is monotone and submodular:
• Monotonicity. For any A ⊆ B ⊆ [m], we have fx (A) = maxi∈A xi ≤ maxi∈B xi =
fx (B).
• Submodularity. For any A ⊆ B ⊆ [m] and any k ∈ [m] \ B, there are three cases (note
that maxi∈A xi ≤ maxi∈B xi ):
(i) If xk ≤ maxi∈A xi , then fx (A ∪ {k}) − fx (A) = 0 = fx (B ∪ {k}) − fx (B).
23
(ii) If maxi∈A xi < xk ≤ maxi∈B xi , then fx (A ∪ {k}) − fx (A) = xk − maxi∈A xi >
0 = fx (B ∪ {k}) − fx (B).
(iii) If xk > maxi∈B xi , then fx (A ∪ {k}) − fx (A) = xk − maxi∈A xi ≥ xk −
maxi∈B xi = fx (B ∪ {k}) − fx (B).
Therefore, we always have fx (A ∪ {k}) − fx (A) ≥ fx (B ∪ {i}) − fx (B). The function
fx (S) is submodular.
For any S ⊆ [m] we have
rD (S) =
s2
s1 X
X
j1 =1 j2 =1
···
sm
X
f(v1,j1 ,...,vm,jm ) (S)
m
Y
pi,ji .
i=1
jm =1
Since each set function f(v1,j1 ,...,vm,jm ) (S) is monotone and submodular, rD (S) is a convex combination of monotone submodular functions on 2[m] . Therefore, rD (S) is also a monotone submodular
function. According to the classical result on submodular maximization [25], the greedy algorithm
can find a (1 − 1/e)-approximate solution to maxS⊆[m],|S|≤K {rD (S)}.
C.2 PTAS
Now we provide a PTAS for the K-MAX problem. In other words, we give an algorithm which,
given any fixed constant 0 < ε < 1/2, can find a solution S of cardinality |K| such that rD (S) ≥
(1 − ε) · OPT in polynomial time.
We first provide an overview of our approach, and then spell out the details later.
1. (Discretization) We first transform each Xi to another discrete distribution X̃i , such that all
X̃i ’s are supported on a set of size O(1/ε2 ).
2. (Computing signatures) For each Xi , we can compute from X̃i a signature Sig(X
P i ) which
is a vector of size O(1/ε2 ). For a set S, we define its signature Sig(S) to be i∈S Sig(Xi ).
We show that if two sets S1 and S2 have the same signature, their objective values are close
(Lemma 12).
3. (Enumerating signatures) We enumerate all possible signatures (there are polynomial number of them when treating ε as a constant) and try to find the one which is the signature of
a set of size K, and the objective value is maximized.
C.2.1 Discretization
We first describe the discretization step. We say that a random variable X follows the Bernoulli
distribution B(v, q) if X takes value v with probability q and value 0 with probability 1 − q. For any
discrete distribution, we can rewrite it as the maximum of a set of Bernoulli distributions.
Definition 1. Let X be a discrete random variable with support {v1 , v2 , . . . , vs }(v1 < v2 < · · · <
vs ) and Pr[X = vj ] = pj . We define a set of independent Bernoulli random variables {Zj }j∈[s] as
!
pj
Zj ∼ B vj , P
.
j ′ ≤j pj ′
We call {Zj } the Bernoulli decomposition of Xi .
Lemma 10. For a discrete distribution X and its Bernoulli decomposition {Zj }, maxj {Zj } has
the same distribution with X.
Proof. We can easily see the following:
Pr[max{Zj } = vi ] = Pr[Zi = vi ]
j
= P
pi
i′ ≤i
pi′
24
Y
Pr[Zi′ = 0]
i′ >i
Y
h>i
1− P
ph
h′ ≤h
p h′
!
Algorithm 6 Discretization
1: We first run Greedy-K-MAX to obtain a solution SG and let W = rD (SG ).
2: for i = 1 to m do
3:
Compute the Bernoulli decomposition {Zi,j }j of Xi .
4:
for all Zi,j do
5:
Create another Bernoulli variable Z̃i,j as follows:
6:
if vi,j > W/ε then
ε
7:
Let Z̃i,j ∼ B W
ε , E[Zi,j ] W (Case 1)
8:
else
Zi,j
9:
Let Z̃i,j = ⌊ εW
⌋εW (Case 2)
10:
end if
11:
end for
12:
Let X̃i = maxj {Z̃ij }
13: end for
= P
pi
i′ ≤i
pi′
Y
h>i
Hence, Pr[maxj {Zj } = vi ] = Pr[X = vi ] for all i ∈ [s].
P
h′ ≤h−1 ph′
P
= pi .
h′ ≤h ph′
Now, we describe how to construct the discretization X̃i of Xi for all i ∈ [m]. The pseudocode can
be found in Algorithm 6. We first run Greedy-K-MAX to obtain a solution SG . Let W = rD (SG ).
By Lemma 9, we know that W ≥ (1 − 1/e)OPT. Then we compute the Bernoulli decomposition
{Zi,j }j of Xi . For each Zi,j , we create another Bernoulli variable Z̃i,j as follows: Recall that vi,j
is the nonzero possible value
of Zij . We distinguish two cases. Case 1: If vi,j > W/ε, then we let
ε
,
E[Z
]
.
It
is
easy to see that E[Z̃ij ] = E[Zij ]. Case 2: If vi,j ≤ W/ε, then we
Z̃i,j ∼ B W
i,j
ε
W
Zi,j
⌋εW. We note that more than one Z̃ij ’s may have the same support, and all Z̃ij ’s
let Z̃i,j = ⌊ εW
are supported on DS = {0, εW, 2εW, . . . , W/ε}. Finally, we let X̃i = maxj {Z̃ij }, which is the
discretization of Xi . Since X̃i is the maximum of a set of Bernoulli distributions, it is also a discrete
distribution supported on DS. We can easily compute Pr[X̃i = v] for any v ∈ DS.
Now, we show that the discretization only incurs a small loss in the objective value. The key is to
show that we do not lose much in the transformation from Zi,j ’s to Z̃i,j ’s. We prove a slightly more
general lemma as follows.
Lemma 11. Consider any set of Bernoulli variables {Zi ∼ B(ai , pi )}1≤i≤n . Assume that
E[maxi∈[n] Zi ] < cW, where c is a constant such that cε < 1/2. For each Zi , we create a Bernoulli
variable Z̃i in the same way as Algorithm 6. Then the following holds:
E[max Zi ] ≥ E[max Z̃i ] ≥ E[max Zi ] − (2c + 1)εW.
Proof. Assume a1 is the largest among all ai ’s.
If a1 < W/ε, all Z̃i are created in Case 2. In this case, it is obvious to have that
E[max Zi ] ≥ E[max Z̃i ] ≥ E[max Zi ] − εW.
If a1 ≥ W/ε, the proof is slightly more complicated. Let L = {i | ai ≥ W/ε}. We prove by
induction on n (i.e., the number of the variables) the following more general claim:
X
E[max Zi ] ≥ E[max Z̃i ] ≥ E[max Zi ] − εW − c
εai pi .
(31)
i∈L
Consider the base case n = 1. The lemma holds immediately in Case 1 as E[Z1 ] = E[Z˜1 ].
Assuming the lemma is true for n = k, we show it also holds for n = k + 1. Recall we have
Z̃1 ∼ B( W
ε , εE[Z1 ]/W). Thus
E[max Zi ] − E[max Z̃i ] =a1 p1 + (1 − p1 )E[max Zi ] − a1 p1 − (1 − εE[Z1 ]/W)E[max Z̃i ]
i≥1
i≥1
i≥2
25
i≥2
≥(1 − p1 )E[max Z̃i ] − (1 − εE[Z1 ]/W)E[max Z̃i ]
i≥2
i≥2
=(εa1 p1 /W − p1 )E[max Z̃i ] ≥ 0,
i≥2
where the first inequality follows from the induction hypothesis and the last from a1 ≥ W/ε. The
other direction can be seen as follows:
E[max Z̃i ] − E[max Zi ] =a1 p1 + (1 − εE[Z1 ]/W)E[max Z̃i ] − (a1 p1 + (1 − p1 )E[max Zi ])
i≥1
i≥1
i≥2
i≥2
X
εai pi
≥(1 − εE[Z1 ]/W)E[max Zi ] − (1 − p1 )E[max Zi ] − εW − c
i≥2
i≥2
≥(−εE[Z1 ]/W)E[max Zi ] − εW − c
i≥2
≥ − εW − c
X
X
i∈L\{1}
εai pi
i∈L\{1}
εai pi ,
i∈L
where the last inequality holds since E[maxi≥2 Zi ] ≤ cW. This finishes the proof of (31).
P
Now, we show that i∈L ai pi ≤ 2W. This can be seen as follows. First, we can see from Markov
inequality that
Pr[max Zi > W/ε] ≤ cε.
Q
Equivalently, we have i∈L (1 − pi ) ≥ 1 − cε. Then, we can see that
W≥
X
ai
i∈L
X
Y
1X
(1 − pj )pi ≥ (1 − cε)
ai p i ≥
ai p i .
2
j<i
i∈L
i∈L
Plugging this into (31), we prove the lemma.
Corollary 1. For any set S ⊆ [m], suppose E[maxi∈S Xi ] < cW, where c is a constant such that
cε < 1/2. Then the following holds:
E[max Xi ] ≥ E[max X̃i ] ≥ E[max Xi ] − (2c + 1)εW.
i∈S
i∈S
i∈S
C.2.2 Signatures
For each Xi , we have created its discretization X̃i = maxj {Z̃ij }. Since X̃i is a discrete distribution,
we can define its Bernoulli decomposition {Yij }j∈[h] where h = |DS|. Suppose Yij ∼ B(jεW, qij ).
Now, we define the signature of Xi to be the vector Sig(Xi ) = (Sig(Xi )1 , . . . , Sig(Xi )h ) where
4
− ln (1 − qij )
ε
ln(1/ε4 )
Sig(Xi )j = min
,
·
j ∈ [h].
ε4 /m
ε4 /m
m
For any set S, define its signature to be
Sig(S) =
X
Sig(Xi ).
i∈S
Define the set SG of signature vectors to be all nonnegative h-dimensional vectors, where each
coordinate
is an integer multiple
of ε4 /m and at most m ln(1/ε4 ). Clearly, the size of SG is
2
h−1
O mε−4 log(h/ε2 )
= Õ(mO(1/ε ) ), which is polynomial for any fixed constant ε > 0
(recall h = |DS| = O(1/ε2 )).
Now, we prove the following crucial lemma.
Lemma 12. Consider two sets S1 and S2 . If Sig(S1 ) = Sig(S2 ), the following holds:
E[max X̃i ] − E[max X̃i ] ≤ O(ε)W.
i∈S1
i∈S2
26
Algorithm 7 PTAS-K-MAX
1: U ← ∅
2: for all signature vector sg ∈ SG do
3:
Find a set S such that |S| = K and Sig(S) = sg
4:
if rD (S) > rD (U ) then
5:
U ←S
6:
end if
7: end for
Output: U
Proof. Suppose {Yij }j∈[h] is the Bernoulli decomposition of X̃i . For any set S, we define Yk (S) =
maxi∈S Yik (it is the max of a set of Bernoulli distributions).
Q It is not hard to see that Yk (S) has a
Bernoulli distribution B(kεW, pk (S)) with pk (S) = 1 − i∈S (1 − qik ). As Sig(S1 ) = Sig(S2 ),
we have that
Y
Y
|pk (S1 ) − pk (S2 )| = |
(1 − qik ) −
(1 − qik )|
i∈S1
= exp
i∈S2
X
i∈S1
≤ 2ε4
!
ln(1 − qik )
− exp
∀k ∈ [h].
X
i∈S2
!
ln(1 − qik )
Noticing maxi∈S X̃i = maxk Yk (S), we have that
E[max X̃i ] − E[max X̃i ] = E[max Yk (S1 )] − E[max Yk (S2 )]
k
k
i∈S2
i∈S1
!
X
W
|pk (S1 ) − pk (S2 )|
≤
ε
k
≤4hε3 W = O(ε)W
where the first inequality follows from Lemma 1.
For any signature vector sg, we associate to it a set of random variables {Bk ∼ B(kεW, 1 −
e−sgk )}hk=1 .8 Define the value of sg to be Val(sg) = E[maxk∈[h] Bk ].
Corollary 2. For any feasible set S with Sig(S) = sg, |E[maxi∈S X̃i ] − Val(sg)| ≤ O(ε)W.
Moreover, combining with Corollary 1, we have that |E[maxi∈S Xi ] − Val(sg)| ≤ O(ε)W.
C.2.3 Enumerating Signatures
Our algorithm enumerates all signature vectors sg in SG. For each sg, we check if we can find a set S
2
of size K such that Sig(S) = sg. This can be done by a standard dynamic program in Õ(mO(1/ε ) )
′
′
time as follows: We use Boolean variable R[i][j][sg ] to represent whether signature vector sg ∈ SG
can be dominated by i variables in set {X1 , . . . , Xj }. The dynamic programming recursion is
R[i][j][sg′ ] = R[i][j − 1][sg′ ] ∧ R[i − 1][j − 1][sg′ − Sig(Xj )].
If the answer is yes (i.e., we can find such S), we say sg is a feasible signature vector and S is
a candidate set. Finally, we pick the candidate set with maximum rD (S) and output the set. The
pseudocode can be found in Algorithm 7.
Now, we are ready to prove Theorem 4 by showing Algorithm 7 is a PTAS for the K-MAX problem.
Proof of Theorem 4. Suppose S ∗ is the optimal solution and sg∗ is the signature of S ∗ . By Corollary 2, we have that |OPT − Val(sg∗ )| ≤ O(ε)W.
8
It is not hard to see the signature of maxk∈[h] Bk is exactly sg.
27
Algorithm 8 Online Submodular Maximization [26]
1: Let A1 , A2 , . . . , AK be K instances of Exp3
2: for t = 1, 2, . . . do
3:
// Action in the t-th round
4:
for i = 1 to K do
5:
Use Ai to select an arm at,i ∈ [m]
6:
end for
SK
7:
Play the super arm St ← i=1 {at,i }
8:
for i = 1 to K do
Si−1
Si
9:
Feed back ft ( j=1 {at,j }) − ft ( j=1 {at,j }) as the payoff Ai receives for choosing at,i
10:
end for
11: end for
When Algorithm 7 is enumerating sg∗ , it can find a set S such that Sig(S) = sg∗ (there exists at
least one such set since S ∗ is one). Therefore, we can see that
|E[max Xi ] − E[max∗ Xi ]| ≤ |Val(sg∗ ) − max Xi | + |Val(sg∗ ) − E[max∗ Xi ]| ≤ O(ε)W.
i∈S
i∈S
i∈S
i∈S
Let U be the output of Algorithm 7. Since W ≥ (1 − 1/e)OPT, we have rD (U ) ≥ rD (S) =
E[maxi∈S Xi ] ≥ (1 − O(ε))OPT.
The running time of the algorithm is polynomial for a fixed constant ε > 0, since the number of
signature vectors is polynomial and the dynamic program in each iteration also runs in polynomial
time. Hence, we have a PTAS for the K-MAX problem.
Remark. In fact, Theorem 4 can be generalized in the following way: instead of the cardinality
constraint |S| ≤ K, we can have more general combinatorial constraint on the feasible set S. As
long as we can execute line 3 in Algorithm 7 in polynomial time, the analysis wound be the same.
Using the same trick as in [20], we can extend the dynamic program to a more general class of
combinatorial constraints where there is a pseudo-polynomial time for the exact version9 of the
deterministic version of the corresponding problem. The class of constraints includes s-t simple
paths, knapsacks, spanning trees, matchings, etc.
D
Empirical Comparison between the SDCB Algorithm and Online
Submodular Maximization on the K-MAX Problem
We perform experiments to compare the SDCB algorithm with the online submodular maximization
algorithm in [26], on the K-MAX problem.
Online Submodular Maximization. First we briefly describe the online submodular maximization problem considered in [26] and the algorithm therein. At the beginning, an oblivious adversary
sets a sequence of submodular functions f1 , f2 , . . . , fT on 2[m] , where ft will be used to determine the reward in the t-th round. In the t-th round, if the player selects a feasible super arm
St , the reward will be ft (St ). This model covers the K-MAX problem as an instance: suppose
(t)
(t)
X (t) = (X1 , . . . , Xm ) ∼ D is the outcome vector sampled in the t-th round, then the func(t)
tion ft (S) = maxi∈S Xi is submodular and will determine the reward in the t-th round. We
summarize the algorithm in Algorithm 8. It uses K copies of the Exp3√algorithm (see [3] for an
introduction). For the K-MAX problem, Algorithm 8 achieves an O(K mT log m) upper bound
on the (1 − 1/e)-approximation regret.
Setup. We set m = 9 and K = 3, i.e., there are 9 arms in total and it is allowed to select at
most 3 arms in each round. We compare the performance of SDCB/Lazy-SDCB and the online submodular maximization algorithm on four different distributions. Here we use the greedy algorithm
Greedy-K-MAX (Algorithm 5) as the offline oracle.
9
In the exact version of a problem, we ask for a feasible set S such that total weight of S is exactly a given
target value B. For example, in the exact spanning tree problem where each edge has an integer weight, we
would like to find a spanning tree of weight exactly B.
28
Let Xi ∼ Di (i = 1, . . . , 9). We consider the following distributions. For all of them, the optimal
super arm is S ∗ = {1, 2, 3}.
• Distribution 1: All Di ’s have the same support {0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1}.
For i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.1 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.5.
For i ∈ {4, 5, 6, . . . , 9}, Pr[Xi = 0] = 0.5 and Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi =
0.6] = Pr[Xi = 0.8] = Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.1.
• Distribution 2: All Di ’s have the same support {0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1}.
For i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.1 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.5.
For i ∈ {4, 5, 6, . . . , 9}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.12 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.4.
• Distribution 3: All Di ’s have the same support {0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1}.
For i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.1 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.5.
For i ∈ {4, 5, 6}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.12 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.4.
For i ∈ {7, 8, 9}, Pr[Xi = 0] = Pr[Xi = 0.2] = Pr[Xi = 0.4] = Pr[Xi = 0.6] =
Pr[Xi = 0.8] = 0.16 and Pr[Xi = 1] = 0.2.
• Distribution 4: All Di ’s are continuous distributions on [0, 1].
For i ∈ {1, 2, 3}, Di is the uniform distribution on [0, 1].
For i ∈ {4, 5, 6, . . . , 9}, the probability density function (PDF) of Xi is
1.2
x ∈ [0, 0.5],
f (x) =
0.8
x ∈ (0.5, 1].
These distributions represent several different scenarios. Distribution 1 is relatively “easy” because
the suboptimal arms 4-9’s distribution is far away from arms 1-3’s distribution, whereas distribution
2 is “hard” since the distribution of arms 4-9 is close to the distribution of arms 1-3. In distribution
3, the distribution of arms 4-6 is close to the distribution of arms 1-3’s, while arms 7-9’s distribution is further away. Distribution 4 is an example of a group of continuous distributions for which
Lazy-SDCB is more efficient than SDCB.
We use SDCB for distributions 1-3, and Lazy-SDCB (with known time horizon) for distribution 4.
Figure 1 shows the regrets of both SDCB and the online submodular maximization algorithm. We
plot the 1-approximation regrets instead of the (1 − 1/e)-approximation regrets, since the greedy
oracle usually performs much better than its (1 − 1/e)-approximation guarantee. We can see from
Figure 1 that our algorithms achieve much lower regrets in all examples.
29
1000
SDCB
Online Submodular Maximization
900
450
SDCB
Online Submodular Maximization
800
400
700
350
600
Regret
Regret
300
500
400
250
200
300
150
200
100
100
0
50
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0
10000
Time
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
8000
9000
10000
Time
(a) Distribution 1
(b) Distribution 2
600
600
Lazy-SDCB
Online Submodular Maximization
500
500
400
400
Regret
Regret
SDCB
Online Submodular Maximization
300
300
200
200
100
100
0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
0
10000
Time
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Time
(c) Distribution 3
(d) Distribution 4
Figure 1: Regrets of SDCB/Lazy-SDCB and Algorithm 8 on the K-MAX problem, for distributions
1-4. The regrets are averaged over 20 independent runs.
30
| 8cs.DS
|
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
C ONTINUOUS A DAPTATION VIA M ETA -L EARNING IN
N ONSTATIONARY AND C OMPETITIVE E NVIRONMENTS
Maruan Al-Shedivat∗
CMU
Trapit Bansal
UMass Amherst
arXiv:1710.03641v2 [cs.LG] 23 Feb 2018
Igor Mordatch
OpenAI
Yura Burda
OpenAI
Ilya Sutskever
OpenAI
Pieter Abbeel
UC Berkeley
A BSTRACT
The ability to continuously learn and adapt from limited experience in nonstationary
environments is an important milestone on the path towards general intelligence. In
this paper, we cast the problem of continuous adaptation into the learning-to-learn
framework. We develop a simple gradient-based meta-learning algorithm suitable
for adaptation in dynamically changing and adversarial scenarios. Additionally,
we design a new multi-agent competitive environment, RoboSumo, and define
iterated adaptation games for testing various aspects of continuous adaptation. We
demonstrate that meta-learning enables significantly more efficient adaptation than
reactive baselines in the few-shot regime. Our experiments with a population of
agents that learn and compete suggest that meta-learners are the fittest.
1
I NTRODUCTION
Recent progress in reinforcement learning (RL) has achieved very impressive results ranging from
playing games (Mnih et al., 2015; Silver et al., 2016), to applications in dialogue systems (Li et al.,
2016), to robotics (Levine et al., 2016). Despite the progress, the learning algorithms for solving
many of these tasks are designed to deal with stationary environments. On the other hand, real-world
is often nonstationary either due to complexity (Sutton et al., 2007), changes in the dynamics or the
objectives in the environment over the life-time of a system (Thrun, 1998), or presence of multiple
learning actors (Lowe et al., 2017; Foerster et al., 2017a). Nonstationarity breaks the standard
assumptions and requires agents to continuously adapt, both at training and execution time, in order
to succeed.
Learning under nonstationary conditions is challenging. The classical approaches to dealing with
nonstationarity are usually based on context detection (Da Silva et al., 2006) and tracking (Sutton
et al., 2007), i.e., reacting to the already happened changes in the environment by continuously
fine-tuning the policy. Unfortunately, modern deep RL algorithms, while able to achieve super-human
performance on certain tasks, are known to be sample inefficient. Nevertheless, nonstationarity allows
only for limited interaction before the properties of the environment change. Thus, it immediately
puts learning into the few-shot regime and often renders simple fine-tuning methods impractical.
A nonstationary environment can be seen as a sequence of stationary tasks, and hence we propose to
tackle it as a multi-task learning problem (Caruana, 1998). The learning-to-learn (or meta-learning)
approaches (Schmidhuber, 1987; Thrun & Pratt, 1998) are particularly appealing in the few-shot
regime, as they produce flexible learning rules that can generalize from only a handful of examples.
Meta-learning has shown promising results in the supervised domain and have gained a lot of attention
from the research community recently (e.g., Santoro et al., 2016; Ravi & Larochelle, 2016). In this
paper, we develop a gradient-based meta-learning algorithm similar to (Finn et al., 2017b) and suitable
for continuous adaptation of RL agents in nonstationary environments. More concretely, our agents
meta-learn to anticipate the changes in the environment and update their policies accordingly.
While virtually any changes in an environment could induce nonstationarity (e.g., changes in the
physics or characteristics of the agent), environments with multiple agents are particularly challenging
∗
Correspondence: maruan.alshedivat.com. Work done while MA and TB interned at OpenAI.
1
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
due to complexity of the emergent behavior and are of practical interest with applications ranging
from multiplayer games (Peng et al., 2017) to coordinating self-driving fleets Cao et al. (2013).
Multi-agent environments are nonstationary from the perspective of any individual agent since all
actors are learning and changing concurrently (Lowe et al., 2017). In this paper, we consider the
problem of continuous adaptation to a learning opponent in a competitive multi-agent setting.
To this end, we design RoboSumo—a 3D environment with simulated physics that allows pairs of
agents to compete against each other. To test continuous adaptation, we introduce iterated adaptation
games—a new setting where a trained agent competes against the same opponent for multiple rounds
of a repeated game, while both are allowed to update their policies and change their behaviors between
the rounds. In such iterated games, from the agent’s perspective, the environment changes from
round to round, and the agent ought to adapt in order to win the game. Additionally, the competitive
component of the environment makes it not only nonstationary but also adversarial, which provides a
natural training curriculum and encourages learning robust strategies (Bansal et al., 2018).
We evaluate our meta-learning agents along with a number of baselines on a (single-agent) locomotion
task with handcrafted nonstationarity and on iterated adaptation games in RoboSumo. Our results
demonstrate that meta-learned strategies clearly dominate other adaptation methods in the few-shot
regime in both single- and multi-agent settings. Finally, we carry out a large-scale experiment
where we train a diverse population of agents with different morphologies, policy architectures, and
adaptation methods, and make them interact by competing against each other in iterated games. We
evaluate the agents based on their TrueSkills (Herbrich et al., 2007) in these games, as well as evolve
the population as whole for a few generations—the agents that lose disappear, while the winners get
duplicated. Our results suggest that the agents with meta-learned adaptation strategies end up being the
fittest. Videos that demonstrate adaptation behaviors are available at https://goo.gl/tboqaN.
2
R ELATED W ORK
The problem of continuous adaptation considered in this work is a variant of continual learning
(Ring, 1994; 1997) and is related to lifelong (Thrun & Pratt, 1998; Silver et al., 2013) and neverending (Mitchell et al., 2015) learning. Life-long learning systems aim at solving multiple tasks
sequentially by efficiently transferring and utilizing knowledge from already learned tasks to new
tasks while minimizing the effect of catastrophic forgetting (McCloskey & Cohen, 1989). Neverending learning is concerned with mastering a fixed set of tasks in iterations, where the set keeps
growing and the performance on all the tasks in the set keeps improving from iteration to iteration.
The scope of continuous adaptation is narrower and more precise. While life-long and never-ending
learning settings are defined as general multi-task problems (Silver et al., 2013; Mitchell et al.,
2015), continuous adaptation targets to solve a single but nonstationary task or environment. The
nonstationarity in the former two problems exists and is dictated by the selected sequence of tasks.
In the latter case, we assume that nonstationarity is caused by some underlying dynamics in the
properties of a given task in the first place (e.g., changes in the behavior of other agents in a multiagent setting). Finally, in the life-long and never-ending scenarios the boundary between training and
execution is blurred as such systems constantly operate in the training regime. Continuous adaptation,
on the other hand, expects a (potentially trained) agent to adapt to the changes in the environment at
execution time under the pressure of limited data or interaction experience between the changes1 .
Nonstationarity of multi-agent environments is a well known issue that has been extensively studied
in the context of learning in simple multi-player iterated games (such as rock-paper-scissors) where
each episode is one-shot interaction (Singh et al., 2000; Bowling, 2005; Conitzer & Sandholm, 2007).
In such games, discovering and converging to a Nash equilibrium strategy is a success for the learning
agents. Modeling and exploiting opponents (Zhang & Lesser, 2010; Mealing & Shapiro, 2013) or
even their learning processes (Foerster et al., 2017b) is advantageous as it improves convergence or
helps to discover equilibria of certain properties (e.g., leads to cooperative behavior). In contrast,
each episode in RoboSumo consists of multiple steps, happens in continuous time, and requires
learning a good intra-episodic controller. Finding Nash equilibria in such a setting is hard. Thus, fast
adaptation becomes one of the few viable strategies against changing opponents.
1
The limited interaction aspect of continuous adaptation makes the problem somewhat similar to the recently
proposed life-long few-shot learning (Finn et al., 2017a).
2
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Policy
...
τφ
τθ
...
T
φi−1
φi+1
φi
τi−1
τi
τi+1
Ti−1
Ti
Ti+1
Trajectory
+
+
...
deterministic
(a)
Loss
...
Intermediate steps
φ
θ
(b)
stochastic
gradient
(c)
Fig. 1: (a) A probabilistic model for MAML in a multi-task RL setting. The task, T , the policies, π, and the
trajectories, τ , are all random variables with dependencies encoded in the edges of the given graph. (b) Our
extended model suitable for continuous adaptation to a task changing dynamically due to non-stationarity of the
environment. Policy and trajectories at a previous step are used to construct a new policy for the current step. (c)
Computation graph for the meta-update from φi to φi+1 . Boxes represent replicas of the policy graphs with the
specified parameters. The model is optimized via truncated backpropagation through time starting from LTi+1 .
Our proposed method for continuous adaptation follows the general meta-learning paradigm (Schmidhuber, 1987; Thrun & Pratt, 1998), i.e., it learns a high-level procedure that can be used to generate
a good policy each time the environment changes. There is a wealth of work on meta-learning,
including methods for learning update rules for neural models that were explored in the past (Bengio et al., 1990; 1992; Schmidhuber, 1992), and more recent approaches that focused on learning
optimizers for deep networks (Hochreiter et al., 2001; Andrychowicz et al., 2016; Li & Malik, 2016;
Ravi & Larochelle, 2016), generating model parameters (Ha et al., 2016; Edwards & Storkey, 2016;
Al-Shedivat et al., 2017), learning task embeddings (Vinyals et al., 2016; Snell et al., 2017) including
memory-based approaches (Santoro et al., 2016), learning to learn implicitly via RL (Wang et al.,
2016; Duan et al., 2016), or simply learning a good initialization (Finn et al., 2017b).
3
M ETHOD
The problem of continuous adaptation in nonstationary environments immediately puts learning
into the few-shot regime: the agent must learn from only limited amount of experience that it can
collect before its environment changes. Therefore, we build our method upon the previous work on
gradient-based model-agnostic meta-learning (MAML) that has been shown successful in the fewshot settings (Finn et al., 2017b). In this section, we re-derive MAML for multi-task reinforcement
learning from a probabilistic perspective (cf. Grant et al., 2018), and then extend it to dynamically
changing tasks.
3.1
A PROBABILISTIC VIEW OF MODEL - AGNOSTIC META - LEARNING (MAML)
Assume that we are given a distribution over tasks, D(T ), where each task, T , is a tuple:
T := (LT , PT (x) , PT (xt+1 | xt , at ) , H)
(1)
LT is a task-specific loss function that maps a trajectory, τ := (x0 , a1 , x1 , R1 , . . . , aH , xH , RH ) ∈
T , to a loss value, i.e., LT : T 7→ R; PT (x) and PT (xt+1 | xt , at ) define the Markovian dynamics
of the environment in task T ; H denotes the horizon; observations, xt , and actions, at , are elements
(typically, vectors) of the observation space, X , and action space, A, respectively. The loss of a
PH
trajectory, τ , is the negative cumulative reward, LT (τ ) := − t=1 Rt .
The goal of meta-learning is to find a procedure which, given access to a limited experience on a
task sampled from D(T ), can produce a good policy for solving it. More formally, after querying
K trajectories from a task T ∼ D(T ) under policy πθ , denoted τθ1:K , we would like to construct a
new, task-specific policy, πφ , that would minimize the expected subsequent loss on the task T . In
particular, MAML constructs parameters of the task-specific policy, φ, using gradient of LT w.r.t. θ:
K
1 X
φ := θ − α∇θ LT τθ1:K , where LT τθ1:K :=
LT (τθk ), and τθk ∼ PT (τ | θ)
K
k=1
3
(2)
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Algorithm 1 Meta-learning at training time.
Algorithm 2 Adaptation at execution time.
input Distribution over pairs of tasks, P(Ti , Ti+1 ),
learning rate, β.
1: Randomly initialize θ and α.
2: repeat
3: Sample a batch of task pairs, {(Ti , Ti+1 )}n
i=1 .
4: for all task pairs (Ti , Ti+1 ) in the batch do
5:
Sample traj. τθ1:K from Ti using πθ .
Compute φ = φ(τθ1:K , θ, α) as given in (7).
6:
7:
Sample traj. τφ from Ti+1 using πφ .
8: end for
9: Compute ∇θ LTi ,Ti+1 and ∇α LTi ,Ti+1 using
τθ1:K and τφ as given in (8).
10:
Update θ ← θ + β∇θ LT (θ, α).
11:
Update α ← α + β∇α LT (θ, α).
12: until Convergence
output Optimal θ∗ and α∗ .
input A stream of tasks, T1 , T2 , T3 , . . . .
1: Initialize φ = θ.
2: while there are new incoming tasks do
3: Get a new task, Ti , from the stream.
4:
Solve Ti using πφ policy.
1:K
5: While solving Ti , collect trajectories, τi,φ
.
1:K
∗
∗
6: Update φ ← φ(τi,φ , θ , α ) using
importance-corrected meta-update as in (9).
7: end while
Policy parameter space
We call (2) the adaptation update with a step α. The adaptation update is parametrized by θ, which
we optimize by minimizing the expected loss over the distribution of tasks, D(T )—the meta-loss:
min ET ∼D(T ) [LT (θ)] , where LT (θ) := Eτθ1:K ∼PT (τ |θ) Eτφ ∼PT (τ |φ) LT (τφ ) | τθ1:K , θ
(3)
θ
where τθ and τφ are trajectories obtained under πθ and πφ , respectively.
In general, we can think of the task, trajectories, and policies, as random variables (Fig. 1a), where φ
is generated from some conditional distribution PT (φ| θ, τ1:k ). The meta-update(2) is equivalent to
PK
1
2
assuming the delta distribution, PT (φ | θ, τ1:k ) := δ θ − α∇θ K
k=1 LT (τk ) . To optimize (3),
we can use the policy gradient method (Williams, 1992), where the gradient of LT is as follows:
"
"
##
K
X
k
∇θ LT (θ) = Eτθ1:K ∼PT (τ |θ) LT (τφ ) ∇θ log πφ (τφ ) + ∇θ
log πθ (τθ )
(4)
τφ ∼PT (τ |φ)
k=1
The expected loss on a task, LT , can be optimized with trust-region policy (TRPO) (Schulman et al.,
2015a) or proximal policy (PPO) (Schulman et al., 2017) optimization methods. For details and
derivations please refer to Appendix A.
3.2
C ONTINUOUS ADAPTATION VIA META - LEARNING
In the classical multi-task setting, we make no assumptions about the distribution of tasks, D(T ).
When the environment is nonstationary, we can see it as a sequence of stationary tasks on a certain
timescale where the tasks correspond to different dynamics of the environment. Then, D(T ) is
defined by the environment changes, and the tasks become sequentially dependent. Hence, we would
like to exploit this dependence between consecutive tasks and meta-learn a rule that keeps updating
the policy in a way that minimizes the total expected loss encountered during the interaction with the
changing environment. For instance, in the multi-agent setting, when playing against an opponent
that changes its strategy incrementally (e.g., due to learning), our agent should ideally meta-learn to
anticipate the changes and update its policy accordingly.
In the probabilistic language, our nonstationary environment is equivalent to a distribution of tasks
represented by a Markov chain (Fig. 1b). The goal is to minimize the expected loss over the chain of
tasks of some length L:
" L
#
X
min EP(T0 ),P(Ti+1 |Ti )
LTi ,Ti+1 (θ)
(5)
θ
2
i=1
Grant et al. (2018) similarly reinterpret adaptation updates (in non-RL settings) as Bayesian inference.
4
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Here, P(T0 ) and P(Ti+1 | Ti ) denote the initial and the transition probabilities in the Markov chain
of tasks. Note that (i) we deal with Markovian dynamics on two levels of hierarchy, where the upper
level is the dynamics of the tasks and the lower level is the MDPs that represent particular tasks,
and (ii) the objectives, LTi ,Ti+1 , will depend on the way the meta-learning process is defined. Since
we are interested in adaptation updates that are optimal with respect to the Markovian transitions
between the tasks, we define the meta-loss on a pair of consecutive tasks as follows:
h
i
1:K
1:K ∼P
LTi ,Ti+1 (θ) := Eτi,θ
Eτi+1,φ ∼PTi+1 (τ |φ) LTi+1 (τi+1,φ ) | τi,θ
,θ
(6)
Ti (τ |θ)
1:K
The principal difference between the loss in (3) and (6) is that trajectories τi,θ
come from the
current task, Ti , and are used to construct a policy, πφ , that is good for the upcoming task, Ti+1 .
Note that even though the policy parameters, φi , are sequentially dependent (Fig. 1b), in (6) we
always start from the initial parameters, θ 3 . Hence, optimizing LTi ,Ti+1 (θ) is equivalent to truncated
backpropagation through time with a unit lag in the chain of tasks.
To construct parameters of the policy for task Ti+1 , we start from θ and do multiple4 meta-gradient
steps with adaptive step sizes as follows (assuming the number of steps is M ):
φ0i := θ, τθ1:K ∼ PTi (τ | θ),
m−1
1:K
m−1 LT
φm
:=
φ
−
α
∇
τ
, m = 1, . . . , M − 1,
m−1
m
i
i
i
(7)
φi
i,φ
i
−1
1:K
φi+1 := φM
− αM ∇φM −1 LTi τi,φ
M −1
i
i
i
where {αm }M
m=1 is a set of meta-gradient step sizes that are optimized jointly with θ. The computation
graph for the meta-update is given in Fig. 1c. The expression for the policy gradient is the same as
in (4) but with the expectation is now taken w.r.t. to both Ti and Ti+1 :
∇θ,α LTi ,Ti+1 (θ, α) =
"
"
##
K
X
(8)
k
1:K
E τi,θ
LTi+1 (τi+1,φ ) ∇θ,α log πφ (τi+1,φ ) + ∇θ
log πθ (τi,θ )
∼PT (τ |θ)
i
τi+1,φ ∼PTi+1 (τ |φ)
k=1
More details and the analog of the policy gradient theorem for our setting are given in Appendix A.
Note that computing adaptation updates requires interacting with the environment under πθ while
computing the meta-loss, LTi ,Ti+1 , requires using πφ , and hence, interacting with each task in the
sequence twice. This is often impossible at execution time, and hence we use slightly different
algorithms at training and execution times.
Meta-learning at training time. Once we have access to a distribution over pairs of consecutive
tasks5 , P(Ti−1 , Ti ), we can meta-learn the adaptation updates by optimizing θ and α jointly with a
gradient method, as given in Algorithm 1. We use πθ to collect trajectories from Ti and πφ when
interacting with Ti+1 . Intuitively, the algorithm is searching for θ and α such that the adaptation
update (7) computed on the trajectories from Ti brings us to a policy, πφ , that is good for solving
Ti+1 . The main assumption here is that the trajectories from Ti contain some information about Ti+1 .
Note that we treat adaptation steps as part of the computation graph (Fig. 1c) and optimize θ and α
via backpropagation through the entire graph, which requires computing second order derivatives.
Adaptation at execution time. Note that to compute unbiased adaptation gradients at training time,
we have to collect experience in Ti using πθ . At test time, due to environment nonstationarity, we
usually do not have the luxury to access to the same task multiple times. Thus, we keep acting
according to πφ and re-use past experience to compute updates of φ for each new incoming task (see
Algorithm 2). To adjust for the fact that the past experience was collected under a policy different
from πθ , we use importance weight correction. In case of single step meta-update, we have:
K
1 X
πθ (τ k )
φi := θ − α
∇θ LTi−1 (τ k ), τ 1:K ∼ PTi−1 (τ | φi−1 ),
(9)
K
πφi−1 (τ k )
k=1
3
This is due to stability considerations. We find empirically that optimization over sequential updates from
φi to φi+1 is unstable, often tends to diverge, while starting from the same initialization leads to better behavior.
4
Empirically, it turns out that constructing φ via multiple meta-gradient steps (between 2 and 5) with adaptive
step sizes tends yield better results in practice.
5
Given a sequences of tasks generated by a nonstationary environment, T1 , T2 , T3 , . . . , TL , we use the set of
all pairs of consecutive tasks, {(Ti−1 , Ti )}L
i=1 , as the training distribution.
5
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
(a)
(b)
(c)
Fig. 2: (a) The three types of agents used in experiments. The robots differ in the anatomy: the number of legs,
their positions, and constraints on the thigh and knee joints. (b) The nonstationary locomotion environment. The
torques applied to red-colored legs are scaled by a dynamically changing factor. (c) RoboSumo environment.
where πφi−1 and πφi are used to rollout from Ti−1 and Ti , respectively. Extending importance weight
correction to multi-step updates is straightforward and requires simply adding importance weights to
each of the intermediate steps in (7).
4
E NVIRONMENTS
We have designed a set of environments for testing different aspects of continuous adaptation methods
in two scenarios: (i) simple environments that change from episode to episode according to some underlying dynamics, and (ii) a competitive multi-agent environment, RoboSumo, that allows different
agents to play sequences of games against each other and keep adapting to incremental changes in
each other’s policies. All our environments are based on MuJoCo physics simulator (Todorov et al.,
2012), and all agents are simple multi-leg robots, as shown in Fig. 2a.
4.1
DYNAMIC
First, we consider the problem of robotic locomotion in a changing environment. We use a six-leg
agent (Fig. 2b) that observes the absolute position and velocity of its body, the angles and velocities
of its legs, and it acts by applying torques to its joints. The agent is rewarded proportionally to its
moving speed in a fixed direction. To induce nonstationarity, we select a pair of legs of the agent and
scale down the torques applied to the corresponding joints by a factor that linearly changes from 1 to
0 over the course of 7 episodes. In other words, during the first episode all legs are fully functional,
while during the last episode the agent has two legs fully paralyzed (even though the policy can
generate torques, they are multiplied by 0 before being passed to the environment). The goal of
the agent is to learn to adapt from episode to episode by changing its gait so that it is able to move
with a maximal speed in a given direction despite the changes in the environment (cf. Cully et al.,
2015). Also, there are 15 ways to select a pair of legs of a six-leg creature which gives us 15 different
nonstationary environments. This allows us to use a subset of these environments for training and a
separate held out set for testing. The training and testing procedures are described in the next section.
4.2
C OMPETITIVE
Our multi-agent environment, RoboSumo, allows agents to compete in the 1-vs-1 regime following
the standard sumo rules6 . We introduce three types of agents, Ant, Bug, and Spider, with different
anatomies (Fig. 2a). During the game, each agent observes positions of itself and the opponent, its
own joint angles, the corresponding velocities, and the forces exerted on its own body (i.e., equivalent
of tactile senses). The action spaces are continuous.
Iterated adaptation games. To test adaptation, we define the iterated adaptation game (Fig. 3)—a
game between a pair of agents that consists of K rounds each of which consists of one or more fixed
length episodes (500 time steps each). The outcome of each round is either win, loss, or draw. The
agent that wins the majority of rounds (with at least 5% margin) is declared the winner of the game.
There are two distinguishing aspects of our setup: First, the agents are trained either via pure self-play
or versus opponents from a fixed training collection. At test time, they face a new opponent from a
testing collection. Second, the agents are allowed to learn (or adapt) at test time. In particular, an
6
To win, the agent has to push the opponent out of the ring or make the opponent’s body touch the ground.
6
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Round 1
Round 2
Round 3
Round K
version 1
version 2
version 3
version K
Agent:
Episodes:
Opponent:
Fig. 3: An agent competes with an opponent in an iterated adaptation games that consist of multi-episode rounds.
The agent wins a round if it wins the majority of episodes (wins and losses illustrated with color). Both the agent
and its opponent may update their policies from round to round (denoted by the version number).
agent should exploit the fact that it plays against the same opponent multiple consecutive rounds and
try to adjust its behavior accordingly. Since the opponent may also be adapting, the setup allows to
test different continuous adaptation strategies, one versus the other.
Reward shaping. In RoboSumo, rewards are naturally sparse: the winner gets +2000, the loser is
penalized for -2000, and in case of a draw both opponents receive -1000 points. To encourage fast
learning at the early stages of training, we shape the rewards given to agents in the following way:
the agent (i) gets reward for staying closer to the center of the ring, for moving towards the opponent,
and for exerting forces on the opponent’s body, and (ii) gets penalty inversely proportional to the
opponent’s distance to the center of the ring. At test time, the agents continue having access to the
shaped reward as well and may use it to update their policies. Throughout our experiments, we use
discounted rewards with the discount factor, γ = 0.995. More details are in Appendix D.2.
Calibration. To study adaptation, we need a well-calibrated environment in which none of the agents
has an initial advantage. To ensure the balance, we increased the mass of the weaker agents (Ant
and Spider) such that the win rates in games between one agent type versus the other type in the
non-adaptation regime became almost equal (for details on calibration see Appendix D.3).
5
E XPERIMENTS
Our goal is to test different adaptation strategies in the proposed nonstationary RL settings. However,
it is known that the test-time behavior of an agent may highly depend on a variety of factors besides
the chosen adaptation method, including training curriculum, training algorithm, policy class, etc.
Hence, we first describe the precise setup that we use in our experiments to eliminate irrelevant
factors and focus on the effects of adaptation. Most of the low-level details are deferred to appendices.
Video highlights of our experiments are available at https://goo.gl/tboqaN.
5.1
T HE SETUP
Policies. We consider 3 types of policy networks: (i) a 2-layer MLP, (ii) embedding (i.e., 1
fully-connected layer replicated across the time dimension) followed by a 1-layer LSTM, and
(iii) RL2 (Duan et al., 2016) of the same architecture as (ii) which additionally takes previous reward
and done signals as inputs at each step, keeps the recurrent state throughout the entire interaction
with a given environment (or an opponent), and resets the state once the latter changes. For advantage
functions, we use networks of the same structure as for the corresponding policies and have no
parameter sharing between the two. Our meta-learning agents use the same policy and advantage
function structures as the baselines and learn a 3-step meta-update with adaptive step sizes as given
in (7). Illustrations and details on the architectures are given in Appendix B.
Meta-learning. We compute meta-updates via gradients of the negative discounted rewards received
during a number of previous interactions with the environment. At training time, meta-learners
interact with the environment twice, first using the initial policy, πθ , and then the meta-updated
policy, πφ . At test time, the agents are limited to interacting with the environment only once, and
hence always act according to πφ and compute meta-updates using importance-weight correction
(see Sec. 3.2 and Algorithm 2). Additionally, to reduce the variance of the meta-updates at test time,
the agents store the experience collected during the interaction with the test environment (and the
corresponding importance weights) into the experience buffer and keep re-using that experience
7
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Total episodic reward
Back two legs
Middle two legs
Front two legs
Policy + adaptation method
1000
1000
1000
500
500
0
500
0
0
1
3
5
7
MLP
MLP + PPO-tracking
MLP + meta-updates
LSTM
LSTM + PPO-tracking
LSTM + meta-updates
RL2
1
3
5
7
Consecutive episodes
1
3
5
7
Fig. 4: Episodic rewards for 7 consecutive episodes in 3 held out nonstationary locomotion environments. To
evaluate adaptation strategies, we ran each of them in each environment for 7 episodes followed by a full reset of
the environment, policy, and meta-updates (repeated 50 times). Shaded regions are 95% confidence intervals.
Best viewed in color.
to update πφ as in (7). The size of the experience buffer is fixed to 3 episodes for nonstationary
locomotion and 75 episodes for RoboSumo. More details are given in Appendix C.1.
Adaptation baselines. We consider the following three baseline strategies:
(i) naive (or no adaptation),
(ii) implicit adaptation via RL2 , and
(iii) adaptation via tracking (Sutton et al., 2007) that keeps doing PPO updates at execution time.
Training in nonstationary locomotion. We train all methods on the same collection of nonstationary
locomotion environments constructed by choosing all possible pairs of legs whose joint torques are
scaled except 3 pairs that are held out for testing (i.e., 12 training and 3 testing environments for
the six-leg creature). The agents are trained on the environments concurrently, i.e., to compute a
policy update, we rollout from all environments in parallel and then compute, aggregate, and average
the gradients (for details, see Appendix C.2). LSTM policies retain their state over the course of 7
episodes in each environment. Meta-learning agents compute meta-updates for each nonstationary
environment separately.
Training in RoboSumo. To ensure consistency of the training curriculum for all agents, we first
pre-train a number of policies of each type for every agent type via pure self-play with the PPO
algorithm (Schulman et al., 2017; Bansal et al., 2018). We snapshot and save versions of the pretrained policies at each iteration. This lets us train other agents to play against versions of the
pre-trained opponents at various stages of mastery. Next, we train the baselines and the meta-learning
agents against the pool of pre-trained opponents7 concurrently. At each iteration k we (a) randomly
select an opponent from the training pool, (b) sample a version of the opponent’s policy to be in [1, k]
(this ensures that even when the opponent is strong, sometimes an undertrained version is selected
which allows the agent learn to win at early stages), and (c) rollout against that opponent. All baseline
policies are trained with PPO; meta-learners also used PPO as the outer loop for optimizing θ and α
parameters. We retain the states of the LSTM policies over the course of interaction with the same
version of the same opponent and reset it each time the opponent version is updated. Similarly to
the locomotion setup, meta-learners compute meta-updates for each opponent in the training pool
separately. A more detailed description of the distributed training is given in Appendix C.2.
Experimental design. We design our experiments to answer the following questions:
• When the interaction with the environment before it changes is strictly limited to one or very
few episodes, what is the behavior of different adaptation methods in nonstationary locomotion
and competitive multi-agent environments?
• What is the sample complexity of different methods, i.e., how many episodes is required for
a method to successfully adapt to the changes? We test this by controlling the amount of
experience the agent is allowed to get form the same environment before it changes.
7
In competitive multi-agent environments, besides self-play, there are plenty of ways to train agents, e.g.,
train them in pairs against each other concurrently, or randomly match and switch opponents each few iterations.
We found that concurrent training often leads to an unbalanced population of agents that have been trained under
vastly different curricula and introduces spurious effects that interfere with our analysis of adaptation. Hence,
we leave the study of adaptation in naturally emerging curricula in multi-agent settings to the future work.
8
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Agent:
Opponent:
0.6
Win rate
RL2
Ant
Ant
LSTM + PPO-tracking
Opponent:
0.6
Bug
0.2
0.2
0
25
Agent:
0.8
Win rate
Spider
0.4
0.2
50
75
100
0.0
0
25
50
75
Consecutive rounds
RL2
Bug
Opponent:
0.8
Ant
100
0
LSTM + PPO-tracking
Opponent:
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.2
0
25
Agent:
50
75
25
50
75
Consecutive rounds
RL2
Ant
Bug
0.2
0.2
0.2
75
100
0
25
50
75
Consecutive rounds
25
100
Spider
100
50
75
100
LSTM + meta-updates
Opponent:
0.6
0.4
50
Opponent:
0
0.4
25
75
LSTM + meta-updates
LSTM + PPO-tracking
Opponent:
0.6
100
0.4
0
50
0.2
0
Spider
Opponent:
0.6
100
25
0.8
Bug
0.6
0.2
Win rate
Opponent:
0.6
0.4
0.4
LSTM + meta-updates
0
25
50
Spider
75
100
Fig. 5: Win rates for different adaptation strategies in iterated games versus 3 different pre-trained opponents.
At test time, both agents and opponents started from versions 700. Opponents’ versions were increasing with
each consecutive round as if they were learning via self-play, while agents were allowed to adapt only from the
limited experience with a given opponent. Each round consisted of 3 episodes. Each iterated game was repeated
100 times; shaded regions denote bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals; no smoothing. Best viewed in color.
Additionally, we ask the following questions specific to the competitive multi-agent setting:
• Given a diverse population of agents that have been trained under the same curriculum, how do
different adaptation methods rank in a competition versus each other?
• When the population of agents is evolved for several generations—such that the agents interact
with each other via iterated adaptation games, and those that lose disappear while the winners
get duplicated—what happens with the proportions of different agents in the population?
5.2
A DAPTATION IN THE FEW- SHOT REGIME AND SAMPLE COMPLEXITY
Few-shot adaptation in nonstationary locomotion environments. Having trained baselines and
meta-learning policies as described in Sec. 5.1, we selected 3 testing environments that corresponded
to disabling 3 different pairs of legs of the six-leg agent: back, middle, and front legs. The results are
presented on Fig. 4. Three observations: First, during the very first episode, the meta-learned initial
policy, πθ? , turns out to be suboptimal for the task (it underperforms compared to other policies).
However, after 1-2 episodes (and environment changes), it starts performing on par with other policies.
Second, by the 6th and 7th episodes, meta-updated policies perform much better than the rest. Note
that we use 3 gradient meta-updates for the adaptation of the meta-learners; the meta-updates are
computed based on experience collected during the previous 2 episodes. Finally, tracking is not able
to improve upon the baseline without adaptation and sometimes leads to even worse results.
Adaptation in RoboSumo under the few-shot constraint. To evaluate different adaptation methods
in the competitive multi-agent setting consistently, we consider a variation of the iterated adaptation
game, where changes in the opponent’s policies at test time are pre-determined but unknown to the
9
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Ant vs Ant
Win rate
0.6
Bug vs Bug
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0
25
50
75
0.2
0
Spider vs Spider
0.6
25
50
75
Episodes per round
0.2
0
25
50
RL2
LSTM + PPO-tracking
LSTM + meta-updates
No adaptation
75
Fig. 6: The effect of increased number of episodes per round in the iterated games versus a learning opponent.
agents. In particular, we pre-train 3 opponents (1 of each type, Fig. 2a) with LSTM policies with
PPO via self-play (the same way as we pre-train the training pool of opponents, see Sec. 5.1) and
snapshot their policies at each iteration. Next, we run iterated games between our trained agents that
use different adaptation algorithms versus policy snapshots of the pre-trained opponents. Crucially,
the policy version of the opponent keeps increasing from round to round as if it was training via
self-play8 . The agents have to keep adapting to increasingly more competent versions of the opponent
(see Fig. 3). This setup allows us to test different adaptation strategies consistently against the same
learning opponents.
The results are given on Fig. 5. We note that meta-learned adaptation strategies, in most cases, are
able to adapt and improve their win-rates within about 100 episodes of interaction with constantly
improving opponents. On the other hand, performance of the baselines often deteriorates during the
rounds of iterated games. Note that the pre-trained opponents were observing 90 episodes of self-play
per iteration, while the agents have access to only 3 episodes per round.
Sample complexity of adaptation in RoboSumo. Meta-learning helps to find an update suitable
for fast or few-shot adaptation. However, how do different adaptation methods behave when more
experience is available? To answer this question, we employ the same setup as previously and vary
the number of episodes per round in the iterated game from 3 to 90. Each iterated game is repeated
20 times, and we measure the win-rates during the last 25 rounds of the game.
The results are presented on Fig. 6. When the number of episodes per round goes above 50, adaptation
via tracking technically turns into “learning at test time,” and it is able to learn to compete against the
self-trained opponents that it has never seen at training time. The meta-learned adaptation strategy
performed near constantly the same in both few-shot and standard regimes. This suggests that the
meta-learned strategy acquires a particular bias at training time that allows it to perform better from
limited experience but also limits its capacity of utilizing more data. Note that, by design, the
meta-updates are fixed to only 3 gradient steps from θ? with step-sizes α? (learned at training), while
tracking keeps updating the policy with PPO throughout the iterated game. Allowing for meta-updates
that become more flexible with the availability of data can help to overcome this limitation. We leave
this to future work.
5.3
E VALUATION ON THE POPULATION - LEVEL
Combining different adaptation strategies with different policies and agents of different morphologies
puts us in a situation where we have a diverse population of agents which we would like to rank
according to the level of their mastery in adaptation (or find the “fittest”). To do so, we employ
TrueSkill (Herbrich et al., 2007)—a metric similar to the ELO rating, but more popular in 1-vs-1
competitive video-games.
In this experiment, we consider a population of 105 trained agents: 3 agent types, 7 different policy
and adaptation combinations, and 5 different stages of training (from 500 to 2000 training iterations).
First, we assume that the initial distribution of any agent’s skill is N (25, 25/3) and the default
distance that guarantees about 76% of winning, β = 4.1667. Next, we randomly generate 1000
matches between pairs of opponents and let them adapt while competing with each other in 100-round
iterated adaptation games (states of the agents are reset before each game). After each game, we
8
At the beginning of the iterated game, both agents and their opponent start from version 700, i.e., from the
policy obtained after 700 iterations (PPO epochs) of learning to ensure that the initial policy is reasonable.
10
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
record the outcome and updated our belief about the skill of the corresponding agents using the
TrueSkill algorithm9 . The distributions of the skill for the agents of each type after 1000 iterated
adaptation games between randomly selected players from the pool are visualized in Fig. 7.
TrueSkill
40
Sub-population:
Ants
Sub-population:
40
Bugs
30
30
30
20
20
20
MLP
LSTM
MLP
no adaptation
Sub-population:
40
LSTM
PPO-tracking
MLP
meta-updates
RL2
Spiders
LSTM
Fig. 7: TrueSkill for the top-performing MLP- and LSTM-based agents. TrueSkill was computed based on
outcomes (win, loss, or draw) in 1000 iterated adaptation games (100 consecutive rounds per game, 3 episodes
per round) between randomly selected pairs of opponents from a population of 105 pre-trained agents.
There are a few observations we can make: First, recurrent policies were dominant. Second, adaptation
via RL2 tended to perform equally or a little worse than plain LSTM with or without tracking in this
setup. Finally, agents that meta-learned adaptation rules at training time, consistently demonstrated
higher skill scores in each of the categories corresponding to different policies and agent types.
Proportion (%)
Finally, we enlarge the population from 105 to 1050 agents by duplicating each of them 10 times and
evolve it (in the “natural selection” sense) for several generations as follows. Initially, we start with
a balanced population of different creatures. Next, we randomly match 1000 pairs of agents, make
them play iterated adaptation games, remove the agents that lost from the population and duplicate the
winners. The same process is repeated 10 times. The result is presented in Fig 8. We see that many
agents quickly disappear form initially uniform population and the meta-learners end up dominating.
Policy + adaptation
100
75
50
25
0
MLP
MLP + PPO-tracking
MLP + meta-updates
LSTM
LSTM + PPO-tracking
LSTM + meta-updates
RL2
Spiders
Bugs
Ants
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Creature generation (#)
7
8
9
10
Fig. 8: Evolution of a population of 1050 agents for 10 generations. Best viewed in color.
6
C ONCLUSION AND F UTURE D IRECTIONS
In this work, we proposed a simple gradient-based meta-learning approach suitable for continuous
adaptation in nonstationary environments. The key idea of the method is to regard nonstationarity
as a sequence of stationary tasks and train agents to exploit the dependencies between consecutive
tasks such that they can handle similar nonstationarities at execution time. We applied our method to
nonstationary locomotion and within a competitive multi-agent setting. For the latter, we designed
the RoboSumo environment and defined iterated adaptation games that allowed us to test various
aspects of adaptation strategies. In both cases, meta-learned adaptation rules were more efficient than
the baselines in the few-shot regime. Additionally, agents that meta-learned to adapt demonstrated
the highest level of skill when competing in iterated games against each other.
The problem of continuous adaptation in nonstationary and competitive environments is far from
being solved, and this work is the first attempt to use meta-learning in such setup. Indeed, our
meta-learning algorithm has a few limiting assumptions and design choices that we have made mainly
due to computational considerations. First, our meta-learning rule is to one-step-ahead update of the
9
We used an implementation from http://trueskill.org/.
11
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
policy and is computationally similar to backpropagation through time with a unit time lag. This
could potentially be extended to fully recurrent meta-updates that take into account the full history
of interaction with the changing environment. Additionally, our meta-updates were based on the
gradients of a surrogate loss function. While such updates explicitly optimized the loss, they required
computing second order derivatives at training time, slowing down the training process by an order of
magnitude compared to baselines. Utilizing information provided by the loss but avoiding explicit
backpropagation through the gradients would be more appealing and scalable. Finally, our approach
is unlikely to work with sparse rewards as the meta-updates use policy gradients and heavily rely on
the reward signal. Introducing auxiliary dense rewards designed to enable meta-learning is a potential
way to overcome this issue that we would like to explore in the future work.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank Harri Edwards, Jakob Foerster, Aditya Grover, Aravind Rajeswaran, Vikash
Kumar, Yuhuai Wu and many others at OpenAI for helpful comments and fruitful discussions.
R EFERENCES
Maruan Al-Shedivat, Avinava Dubey, and Eric P Xing. Contextual explanation networks. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1705.10301, 2017.
Marcin Andrychowicz, Misha Denil, Sergio Gomez, Matthew W Hoffman, David Pfau, Tom Schaul,
and Nando de Freitas. Learning to learn by gradient descent by gradient descent. In Advances in
Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3981–3989, 2016.
Trapit Bansal, Jakub Pachocki, Szymon Sidor, Ilya Sutskever, and Igor Mordatch. Emergent complexity via multi-agent competition. In International Conference on Learning Representations,
2018. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=Sy0GnUxCb.
Samy Bengio, Yoshua Bengio, Jocelyn Cloutier, and Jan Gecsei. On the optimization of a synaptic
learning rule. In Preprints Conf. Optimality in Artificial and Biological Neural Networks, pp. 6–8.
Univ. of Texas, 1992.
Yoshua Bengio, Samy Bengio, and Jocelyn Cloutier. Learning a synaptic learning rule. Université
de Montréal, Département d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelle, 1990.
Michael Bowling. Convergence and no-regret in multiagent learning. In Advances in neural
information processing systems, pp. 209–216, 2005.
Yongcan Cao, Wenwu Yu, Wei Ren, and Guanrong Chen. An overview of recent progress in the
study of distributed multi-agent coordination. IEEE Transactions on Industrial informatics, 9(1):
427–438, 2013.
Rich Caruana. Multitask learning. In Learning to learn, pp. 95–133. Springer, 1998.
Vincent Conitzer and Tuomas Sandholm. Awesome: A general multiagent learning algorithm that
converges in self-play and learns a best response against stationary opponents. Machine Learning,
67(1-2):23–43, 2007.
Antoine Cully, Jeff Clune, Danesh Tarapore, and Jean-Baptiste Mouret. Robots that can adapt like
animals. Nature, 521(7553):503–507, 2015.
Bruno C Da Silva, Eduardo W Basso, Ana LC Bazzan, and Paulo M Engel. Dealing with nonstationary environments using context detection. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, pp. 217–224. ACM, 2006.
Yan Duan, John Schulman, Xi Chen, Peter L Bartlett, Ilya Sutskever, and Pieter Abbeel. Rl2 : Fast
reinforcement learning via slow reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02779, 2016.
Harrison Edwards and Amos Storkey. Towards a neural statistician. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02185,
2016.
12
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Lifelong few-shot learning. In Lifelong Learning: A
Reinforcement Learning Approach ICML workshop, 2017a.
Chelsea Finn, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Model-agnostic meta-learning for fast adaptation of
deep networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03400, 2017b.
Jakob Foerster, Gregory Farquhar, Triantafyllos Afouras, Nantas Nardelli, and Shimon Whiteson.
Counterfactual multi-agent policy gradients. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.08926, 2017a.
Jakob N Foerster, Richard Y Chen, Maruan Al-Shedivat, Shimon Whiteson, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor
Mordatch. Learning with opponent-learning awareness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.04326, 2017b.
Erin Grant, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine, Trevor Darrell, and Thomas Griffiths. Recasting gradientbased meta-learning as hierarchical bayes. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2018. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=BJ_UL-k0b.
David Ha, Andrew Dai, and Quoc V Le. Hypernetworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09106, 2016.
Ralf Herbrich, Tom Minka, and Thore Graepel. TrueskillTM : a bayesian skill rating system. In
Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 569–576, 2007.
Sepp Hochreiter, A Steven Younger, and Peter R Conwell. Learning to learn using gradient descent.
In International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, pp. 87–94. Springer, 2001.
Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Darrell, and Pieter Abbeel. End-to-end training of deep
visuomotor policies. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17(39):1–40, 2016.
Jiwei Li, Will Monroe, Alan Ritter, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, and Dan Jurafsky. Deep reinforcement learning for dialogue generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01541, 2016.
Ke Li and Jitendra Malik. Learning to optimize. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01885, 2016.
Ryan Lowe, Yi Wu, Aviv Tamar, Jean Harb, Pieter Abbeel, and Igor Mordatch. Multi-agent actorcritic for mixed cooperative-competitive environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02275, 2017.
Michael McCloskey and Neal J Cohen. Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The
sequential learning problem. Psychology of learning and motivation, 24:109–165, 1989.
Richard Mealing and Jonathan L Shapiro. Opponent modelling by sequence prediction and lookahead
in two-player games. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing,
pp. 385–396. Springer, 2013.
Tom M Mitchell, William W Cohen, Estevam R Hruschka Jr, Partha Pratim Talukdar, Justin Betteridge,
Andrew Carlson, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Matthew Gardner, Bryan Kisiel, Jayant Krishnamurthy,
et al. Never ending learning. In AAAI, pp. 2302–2310, 2015.
Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Andrei A Rusu, Joel Veness, Marc G Bellemare,
Alex Graves, Martin Riedmiller, Andreas K Fidjeland, Georg Ostrovski, et al. Human-level control
through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540):529–533, 2015.
Peng Peng, Quan Yuan, Ying Wen, Yaodong Yang, Zhenkun Tang, Haitao Long, and Jun Wang.
Multiagent bidirectionally-coordinated nets for learning to play starcraft combat games. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1703.10069, 2017.
Sachin Ravi and Hugo Larochelle. Optimization as a model for few-shot learning. 2016.
Mark B Ring. Continual learning in reinforcement environments. PhD thesis, University of Texas at
Austin Austin, Texas 78712, 1994.
Mark B Ring. CHILD: A first step towards continual learning. Machine Learning, 28(1):77–104,
1997.
Adam Santoro, Sergey Bartunov, Matthew Botvinick, Daan Wierstra, and Timothy Lillicrap. Metalearning with memory-augmented neural networks. In International conference on machine
learning, pp. 1842–1850, 2016.
13
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Jurgen Schmidhuber. Evolutionary principles in self-referential learning. On learning how to learn:
The meta-meta-... hook.) Diploma thesis, Institut f. Informatik, Tech. Univ. Munich, 1987.
Jürgen Schmidhuber. Learning to control fast-weight memories: An alternative to dynamic recurrent
networks. Learning, 4(1), 1992.
John Schulman, Sergey Levine, Pieter Abbeel, Michael Jordan, and Philipp Moritz. Trust region
policy optimization. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML-15), pp. 1889–1897, 2015a.
John Schulman, Philipp Moritz, Sergey Levine, Michael Jordan, and Pieter Abbeel. High-dimensional
continuous control using generalized advantage estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438,
2015b.
John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Radford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy
optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017.
Daniel L Silver, Qiang Yang, and Lianghao Li. Lifelong machine learning systems: Beyond learning
algorithms. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Lifelong Machine Learning, volume 13, pp. 05, 2013.
David Silver, Aja Huang, Chris J Maddison, Arthur Guez, Laurent Sifre, George Van Den Driessche,
Julian Schrittwieser, Ioannis Antonoglou, Veda Panneershelvam, Marc Lanctot, et al. Mastering
the game of go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587):484–489, 2016.
Satinder Singh, Michael Kearns, and Yishay Mansour. Nash convergence of gradient dynamics
in general-sum games. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial
intelligence, pp. 541–548. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2000.
Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, and Richard S Zemel. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1703.05175, 2017.
Richard S Sutton, David A McAllester, Satinder P Singh, and Yishay Mansour. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In Advances in neural information
processing systems, pp. 1057–1063, 2000.
Richard S Sutton, Anna Koop, and David Silver. On the role of tracking in stationary environments.
In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning, pp. 871–878. ACM,
2007.
Sebastian Thrun. Lifelong learning algorithms. Learning to learn, 8:181–209, 1998.
Sebastian Thrun and Lorien Pratt. Learning to learn. Springer, 1998.
Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control.
In Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 5026–
5033. IEEE, 2012.
Oriol Vinyals, Charles Blundell, Tim Lillicrap, Daan Wierstra, et al. Matching networks for one shot
learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3630–3638, 2016.
Jane X Wang, Zeb Kurth-Nelson, Dhruva Tirumala, Hubert Soyer, Joel Z Leibo, Remi Munos,
Charles Blundell, Dharshan Kumaran, and Matt Botvinick. Learning to reinforcement learn. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1611.05763, 2016.
Ronald J Williams. Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement
learning. Machine learning, 8(3-4):229–256, 1992.
Chongjie Zhang and Victor R Lesser. Multi-agent learning with policy prediction. In AAAI, 2010.
14
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
A
D ERIVATIONS AND THE POLICY GRADIENT THEOREM
In this section, we derive the policy gradient update for MAML as give in (4) as well as formulate
and equivalent of the policy gradient theorem (Sutton et al., 2000) in the learning-to-learn setting.
Our derivation is not bound to a particular form of the adaptation update. In general, we are interested
in meta-learning a procedure, fθ , parametrized by θ, which, given access to a limited experience
on a task, can produce a good policy for solving it. Note that fθ is responsible for both collecting
the initial experience and constructing the final policy for the given task. For example, in case of
MAML (Finn et al., 2017b), fθ is represented by the initial policy, πθ , and the adaptation update
rule (4) that produces πφ with φ := θ − α∇θ LT (τθ1:K ).
More formally, after querying K trajectories, τθ1:K , we want to produce πφ that minimizes the
expected loss w.r.t. the distribution over tasks:
h
i
L(θ) := ET ∼D(T ) Eτθ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ) Eτφ ∼pT (τ |φ) LT (τφ ) | τθ1:K
(10)
Note that the inner-most expectation is conditional on the experience, τθ1:K , which our meta-learning
procedure, fθ , collects to produce a task-specific policy, πφ . Assuming that the loss LT (τθ1:K ) is
linear in trajectories, and using linearity of expectations, we can drop the superscript 1 : K and
denote the trajectory sampled under φθ for task Ti simply as τθ,i . At training time, we are given a
finite sample of tasks from the distribution D(T ) and can search for θ̂ close to optimal by optimizing
over the empirical distribution:
θ̂ := argmin L̂(θ), where L̂(θ) :=
θ
N
h
i
1 X
Eτθ,i ∼pTi (τ |θ) Eτφ,i ∼pTi (τ |φ) [LTi (τφ,i ) | τθ,i ] (11)
N i=1
We re-write the objective function for task Ti in (11) more explicitly by expanding the expectations:
h
i
LTi (θ) := Eτθ,i ∼pTi (τ |θ) Eτφ,i ∼pTi (τ |φ) [LTi (τφ,i ) | τθ,i ] =
Z
(12)
LTi (τφ,i ) PTi (τφ,i | φ) PTi (φ | θ, τθ,i ) PTi (τθ,i | θ) dτφ,i dφ dτθ,i
Trajectories, τφ,i and τθ,i , and parameters φ of the policy πφ can be thought as random variables that
we marginalize out to construct the objective that depends on θ only. The adaptation update rule (4)
assumes the following PTi (φ | θ, τθ,i ):
!
K
1 X
k
LTi (τθ,i )
(13)
PTi (φ | θ, τθ,i ) := δ θ − α∇θ
K
k=1
Note that by specifying PTi (φ | θ, τθ,i ) differently, we may arrive at different meta-learning algorithms. After plugging (13) into (12) and integrating out φ, we get the following expected loss for
task Ti as a function of θ:
h
i
LTi (θ) = Eτθ,i ∼pTi (τ |θ) Eτφ,i ∼pTi (τ |φ) [LTi (τφ,i ) | τθ,i ] =
!
Z
K
(14)
1 X
k
LTi (τφ,i ) PTi τφ,i | θ − α∇θ
LTi (τθ,i ) PTi (τθ,i | θ) dτφ,i dτθ,i
K
k=1
The gradient of (14) will take the following form:
Z
∇θ LTi (θ) = [LTi (τφ,i ) ∇θ log PTi (τφ,i | φ)] PTi (τφ,i | φ) PTi (τθ,i | θ) dτ dτθ,i +
Z
[LTi (τ ) ∇θ log PTi (τθ,i | θ)] PTi (τ | φ) PTi (τθ,i | θ) dτ dτθ,i
(15)
1:K
where φ = φ(θ, τθ,i
) as given in (14). Note that the expression consists of two terms: the first
term is the standard policy gradient w.r.t. the updated policy, πφ , while the second one is the policy
1:K
gradient w.r.t. the original policy, πφ , that is used to collect τθ,i
. If we were to omit marginalization
15
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
1:K
of τθ,i
(as it was done in the original paper (Finn et al., 2017b)), the terms would disappear. Finally,
the gradient can be re-written in a more succinct form:
"
"
##
K
X
1:K
∇θ LTi (θ) = Eτθ,i
log πθ (τk )
(16)
∼PT (τ |θ) LTi (τ ) ∇θ log πφ (τ ) + ∇θ
i
τ ∼PTi (τ |φ)
k=1
The update given in (16) is an unbiased estimate of the gradient as long as the loss LTi is simply the
sum of discounted rewards (i.e., it extends the classical REINFORCE algorithm (Williams, 1992) to
meta-learning). Similarly, we can define LTi that uses a value or advantage function and extend the
policy gradient theorem Sutton et al. (2000) to make it suitable for meta-learning.
Theorem 1 (Meta policy gradient theorem). For any MDP, gradient of the value function w.r.t. θ
takes the following form:
∇θ VTθ (x0 ) =
"
#
X φ
X ∂πφ (a | x) φ
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
dT (x)
QT (a, x) +
∂θ
(17)
x
a
"
!
#
K
X
∂ X
log πθ (τk )
πφ (a | x0 )QφT (a, x0 ) ,
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
∂θ
a
k=1
where dφT (x) is the stationary distribution under policy πφ .
Proof. We define task-specific value functions under the generated policy, πφ , as follows:
"H
#
X
φ
t
VT (x0 ) = Eτ ∼pT (τ |φ)
γ RT (xt ) | x0 ,
t=k
"
QφT (x0 , a0 )
= Eτ ∼pT (τ |φ)
H
X
t=k
#
(18)
t
γ RT (xt ) | x0 , a0 ,
where the expectations are taken w.r.t. the dynamics of the environment of the given task, T , and the
policy, πφ . Next, we need to marginalize out τ1:K :
##
"
"H
X
t
θ
VT (x0 ) = Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ) Eτ ∼pT (τ |φ)
γ RT (xt ) | x0 ,
(19)
t=k
and after the gradient w.r.t. θ, we arrive at:
∇θ VTθ (x0 ) =
#
"
X ∂πφ (a | x0 ) φ
∂QφT (a, x0 )
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
QT (a, x0 ) + πφ (a | x0 )
+
∂θ
∂θ
a
" K
!
#
X
X ∂
φ
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
log πθ (τk )
πφ (a | x0 )QT (a, x0 ) ,
∂θ
a
(20)
k=1
where the first term is similar to the expression used in the original policy gradient theorem (Sutton
et al., 2000) while the second one comes from differentiating trajectories τ1:K that depend on θ.
Following Sutton et al. (2000), we unroll the derivative of the Q-function in the first term and arrive
at the following final expression for the policy gradient:
∇θ VTθ (x0 ) =
"
#
X φ
X ∂πφ (a | x) φ
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
dT (x)
QT (a, x) +
∂θ
(21)
x
a
"
!
#
K
X
∂ X
Eτ1:K ∼pT (τ |θ)
log πθ (τk )
πφ (a | x0 )QφT (a, x0 )
∂θ
a
k=1
Remark 1. The same theorem is applicable to the continuous setting with the only changes in the
distributions used to compute expectations in (17) and (18). In particular, the outer expectation in
(17) should be taken w.r.t. pTi (τ | θ) while the inner expectation w.r.t. pTi+1 (τ | φ).
16
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
A.1
M ULTIPLE ADAPTATION GRADIENT STEPS
All our derivations so far assumed single step gradient-based adaptation update. Experimentally, we
found that the multi-step version of the update often leads to a more stable training and better test
time performance. In particular, we construct φ via intermediate M gradient steps:
φ0 := θ,
τθ1:K ∼ PT (τ | θ),
φm := φm−1 − αm ∇φm−1 LT τφ1:K
,
m−1
φ := φM −1 − αM ∇φM −1 LT τφ1:K
M −1
m = 1, . . . , M − 1,
(22)
where φm are intermediate policy parameters. Note that each intermediate step, m, requires interacting
with the environment and sampling intermediate trajectories, τφ1:K
m . To compute the policy gradient,
we need to marginalize out all the intermediate random variables, πφm and τφ1:K
m , m = 1, . . . , M .
The objective function (12) takes the following form:
LT (θ) =
Z
LT (τ ) PT (τ | φ) PT φ | φM −1 , τφ1:K
dτ dφ×
M −1
M
−2
Y
PT
m=1
τφ1:K
m+1
|φ
m+1
(23)
PT φ
m+1
|φ
m
, τφ1:K
m
m+1
dτφ1:K
×
m+1 dφ
PT τ 1:K | θ dτ 1:K
Since PT φm+1 | φm , τφ1:K
at each intermediate steps are delta functions, the final expression
m
for the multi-step MAML objective has the same form as (14), with integration taken w.r.t. all
intermediate trajectories. Similarly, an unbiased estimate of the gradient of the objective gets M
additional terms:
"
"
##
M
−1
K
X
X
k
M −1
∇θ LT = E{τ 1:K
∇θ
log πφm (τφm ) ,
(24)
,τ LT (τ ) ∇θ log πφ (τ ) +
m }
φ
m=0
m=0
k=1
where the expectation is taken w.r.t. trajectories (including all intermediate ones). Again, note that at
training time we do not constrain the number of interactions with each particular environment and
do rollout using each intermediate policy to compute updates. At testing time, we interact with the
environment only once and rely on the importance weight correction as described in Sec. 3.2.
17
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
surrogate
loss
surrogate
loss
surrogate
loss
at
Vt
at
Vt
at
Vt
MLP
MLP
LSTM
LSTM
LSTM
LSTM
64 x 64
64 x 64
64 x 64
64 x 64
xt
xt
(a) MLP
(b) LSTM
64 x 64
xt
64 x 64
dt-1
rt-1
(c) RL2
Fig. 9: Policy and value function architectures.
B
A DDITIONAL DETAILS ON THE ARCHITECTURES
The neural architectures used for our policies and value functions are illustrated in Fig. 9. Our MLP
architectures were memory-less and reactive. The LSTM architectures had used a fully connected
embedding layer (with 64 hidden units) followed by a recurrent layer (also with 64 units). The state
in LSTM-based architectures was kept throughout each episode and reset to zeros at the beginning
of each new episode. The RL2 architecture additionally took reward and done signals from the
previous time step and kept the state throughout the whole interactions with a given environment (or
opponent). The recurrent architectures were unrolled for T = 10 time steps and optimized with PPO
via backprop through time.
C
C.1
A DDITIONAL DETAILS ON META - LEARNING AND OPTIMIZATION
M ETA - UPDATES FOR CONTINUOUS ADAPTATION
Our meta-learned adaptation methods were used with MLP and LSTM policies (Fig. 9). The metaupdates were based on 3 gradient steps with adaptive step sizes α were initialized with 0.001. There
are a few additional details to note:
1. θ and φ parameters were a concatenation of the policy and the value function parameters.
2. At the initial stages of optimization, meta-gradient steps often tended to “explode”, hence
we clipped them by values norms to be between -0.1 and 0.1.
3. We used different surrogate loss functions for the meta-updates and for the outer optimization.
For meta-updates, we used the vanilla policy gradients computed on the negative discounted
rewards, while for the outer optimization loop we used the PPO objective.
C.2
O N PPO AND ITS DISTRIBUTED IMPLEMENTATION
As mentioned in the main text and similar to (Bansal et al., 2018), large batch sizes were used
to ensure enough exploration throughout policy optimization and were critical for learning in the
competitive setting of RoboSumo. In our experiments, the epoch size of the PPO was set 32,000
episodes and the batch size was set to 8,000. The PPO clipping hyperparameter was set to = 0.2 and
the KL penalty was set to 0. In all our experiments, the learning rate (for meta-learning, the learning
rate for θ and α) was set to 0.0003. The generalized advantage function estimator (GAE) (Schulman
et al., 2015b) was optimized jointly with the policy (we used γ = 0.995 and λ = 0.95).
To train our agents in reasonable time, we used a distributed implementation of the PPO algorithm. To
do so, we versioned the agent’s parameters (i.e., kept parameters after each update and assigned it a
version number) and used a versioned queue for rollouts. Multiple worker machines were generating
rollouts in parallel for the most recent available version of the agent parameters and were pushing
them into the versioned rollout queue. The optimizer machine collected rollouts from the queue and
made a PPO optimization steps (see (Schulman et al., 2017) for details) as soon as enough rollouts
were available.
18
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
We trained agents on multiple environments simultaneously. In nonstationary locomotion, each
environment corresponded to a different pair of legs of the creature becoming dysfunctional. In
RoboSumo, each environment corresponded to a different opponent in the training pool. Simultaneous training was achieved via assigning these environments to rollout workers uniformly at random,
so that the rollouts in each mini-batch were guaranteed to come from all training environments.
D
D.1
A DDITIONAL DETAILS ON THE ENVIRONMENTS
O BSERVATION AND ACTION SPACES
Both observation and action spaces in RoboSumo continuous. The observations of each agent
consist of the position of its own body (7 dimensions that include 3 absolute coordinates in the global
cartesian frame and 4 quaternions), position of the opponent’s body (7 dimensions), its own joint
angles and velocities (2 angles and 2 velocities per leg), and forces exerted on each part of its own
body (6 dimensions for torso and 18 for each leg) and forces exerted on the opponent’s torso (6
dimensions). All forces were squared and clipped at 100. Additionally, we normalized observations
using a running mean and clipped their values between -5 and 5. The action spaces had 2 dimensions
per joint. Table 1 summarizes the observation and action spaces for each agent type.
Table 1: Dimensionality of the observation and action spaces of the agents in RoboSumo.
Agent
Coordinates
Observation space
Self
Opponent
Velocities Forces Coordinates Forces
Action space
Ant
15
14
78
7
6
8
Bug
Spider
19
23
18
22
114
150
7
7
6
6
12
16
Note that the agents observe neither any of the opponents velocities, nor positions of the opponent’s
limbs. This allows us to keep the observation spaces consistent regardless of the type of the opponent.
However, even though the agents are blind to the opponent’s limbs, they can sense them via the forces
applied to the agents’ bodies when in contact with the opponent.
D.2
S HAPED REWARDS
In RoboSumo, the winner gets 2000 reward, the loser is penalized for -2000, and in case of draw both
agents get -1000. In addition to the sparse win/lose rewards, we used the following dense rewards to
encourage fast learning at the early training stages:
• Quickly push the opponent outside. The agent got penalty at each time step proportional
to exp{−dopp } where dopp was the distance of the opponent from the center of the ring.
• Moving towards the opponent. Reward at each time step proportional to magnitude of the
velocity component towards the opponent.
• Hit the opponent. Reward proportional to the square of the total forces exerted on the
opponent’s torso.
• Control penalty. The l2 penalty on the actions to prevent jittery/unnatural movements.
D.3
R O B O S U M O CALIBRATION
To calibrate the RoboSumo environment we used the following procedure. First, we trained each
agent via pure self-play with LSTM policy using PPO for the same number of iterations, tested
them one against the other (without adaptation), and recorded the win rates (Table 2). To ensure the
balance, we kept increasing the mass of the weaker agents and repeated the calibration procedure
until the win rates equilibrated.
19
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
Table 2: Win rates for the first agent in the 1-vs-1 RoboSumo without adaptation before and after calibration.
E
Masses (Ant, Bug, Spider)
Ant vs. Bug
Ant vs. Spider
Bug vs. Spider
Initial (10, 10, 10)
Calibrated (13, 10, 39)
25.2 ± 3.9%
50.6 ± 5.6%
83.6 ± 3.1%
51.6 ± 3.4%
90.2 ± 2.7%
51.7 ± 2.8%
A DDITIONAL DETAILS ON EXPERIMENTS
E.1
AVERAGE WIN RATES
Table 3 gives average win rates for the last 25 rounds of iterated adaptation games played by different
agents with different adaptation methods (win rates for each episode are visualized in Figure 5).
Table 3: Average win-rates (95% CI) in the last 25 rounds of the 100-round iterated adaptation games between
different agents and different opponents. The base policy and value function were LSTMs with 64 hidden units.
Adaptation Strategy
LSTM + PPO-tracking LSTM + meta-updates
Agent
Opponent
Ant
Ant
Bug
Spider
24.9 (5.4)%
21.0 (6.3)%
24.8 (10.5)%
30.0 (6.7)%
15.6 (7.1)%
27.6 (8.4)%
44.0 (7.7)%
34.6 (8.1)%
35.1 (7.7)%
Bug
Ant
Bug
Spider
33.5 (6.9)%
28.6 (7.4)%
45.8 (8.1)%
26.6 (7.4)%
21.2 (4.2)%
42.6 (12.9)%
39.5 (7.1)%
43.7 (8.0)%
52.0 (13.9)%
Spider
Ant
Bug
Spider
40.3 (9.7)%
38.4 (7.2)%
33.9 (7.2)%
48.0 (9.8)%
43.9 (7.1)%
42.2 (3.9)%
45.3 (10.9)%
48.4 (9.2)%
46.7 (3.8)%
E.2
RL2
T RUE S KILL RANK OF THE TOP AGENTS
Rank
Agent
TrueSkill rank*
Bug+LSTM-meta - 1 0.50
0.59
0.69
0.70
0.70
0.89
0.93
0.94
0.97
0.97
1
2
3
4
5
Bug + LSTM-meta
Ant + LSTM-meta
Bug + LSTM-track
Ant + RL2
Ant + LSTM
31.7
30.8
29.1
28.6
28.4
Ant+LSTM-meta - 2 0.41
0.50
0.60
0.62
0.62
0.85
0.90
0.92
0.96
0.95
Bug+LSTM-track - 3 0.31
0.40
0.50
0.51
0.51
0.78
0.84
0.88
0.93
0.92
Ant+LSTM-RL2 - 4 0.30
0.38
0.49
0.50
0.50
0.77
0.83
0.87
0.92
0.91
Ant+LSTM - 5 0.30
0.38
0.49
0.50
0.50
0.77
0.83
0.87
0.92
0.91
6
7
8
9
10
Bug + MLP-meta
Ant + MLP-meta
Spider + MLP-meta
Spider + MLP
Bug + MLP-track
23.4
21.6
20.5
19.0
18.9
Bug+MLP-meta - 6 0.11
0.15
0.22
0.23
0.23
0.50
0.60
0.65
0.75
0.74
Ant+MLP-meta - 7 0.07
0.10
0.16
0.17
0.17
0.40
0.50
0.56
0.66
0.65
Spd+MLP-meta - 8 0.06
0.08
0.12
0.13
0.13
0.35
0.44
0.50
0.61
0.60
Spd+MLP - 9 0.03
0.04
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.25
0.34
0.39
0.50
0.49
Bug+MLP-track - 10 0.03
0.05
0.08
0.09
0.09
0.26
0.35
0.40
0.51
0.50
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
* The rank is a conservative estimate of the skill, r = µ − 3σ, to
ensure that the actual skill of the agent is higher with 99% confidence.
1
Table 4 & Fig. 10: Top-5 agents with MLP and LSTM policies from the population ranked by TrueSkill. The
heatmap shows a priori win-rates in iterated games based on TrueSkill for the top agents against each other.
Since TrueSkill represents the belief about the skill of an agent as a normal distribution (i.e., with
two parameters, µ and σ), we can use it to infer a priori probability of an agent, a, winning against
20
Published as a conference paper at ICLR 2018
its opponent, o, as follows (Herbrich et al., 2007):
!
µa − µo
1
x
P (a wins o) = Φ p
, where Φ(x) :=
1 + erf √
2
2
2β 2 + σa2 + σo2
(25)
The ranking of the top-5 agents with MLP and LSTM policies according to their TrueSkill is given in
Tab. 1 and the a priori win rates in Fig. 10. Note that within the LSTM and MLP categories, the best
meta-learners are 10 to 25% more likely to win the best agents that use other adaptation strategies.
E.3
I NTOLERANCE TO LARGE DISTRIBUTIONAL SHIFTS
Continuous adaptation via meta-learning assumes consistency in the changes of the environment or
the opponent. What happens if the changes are drastic? Unfortunately, the training process of our
meta-learning procedure turns out to be sensitive to such shifts and can diverge when the distributional
shifts from iteration to iteration are large. Fig. 11 shows the training curves for a meta-learning agent
with MLP policy trained against versions of an MLP opponent pre-trained via self-play. At each
iteration, we kept updating the opponent policy by 1 to 10 steps. The meta-learned policy was able to
achieve non-negative rewards by the end of training only when the opponent was changing up to 4
steps per iteration.
# of opponent updates per iteration
1 step
4 steps
7 steps
10 steps
Avg. reward per episode
2000
1000
0
−1000
−2000
−3000
0
500
1000
Iteration
1500
Fig. 11: Reward curves for a meta-learning agent trained against a learning opponent. Both agents were Ants
with MLP policies. At each iteration, the opponent was updating its policy for a given number of steps using
self-play, while the meta-learning agent attempted to learn to adapt to the distributional shifts. For each setting,
the training process was repeated 15 times; shaded regions denote 90% confidence intervals.
21
| 2cs.AI
|
A
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person
Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFi
arXiv:1702.02046v1 [cs.CE] 6 Feb 2017
Xuyu Wang, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Chao Yang, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Shiwen Mao, Auburn University, Auburn, AL
Breathing signal monitoring can provide important clues for human’s physical health problems. Comparing
to existing techniques that require wearable devices and special equipment, a more desirable approach is
to provide contact-free and long-term breathing rate monitoring by exploiting wireless signals. In this paper, we propose TensorBeat, a system to employ channel state information (CSI) phase difference data to
intelligently estimate breathing rates for multiple persons with commodity WiFi devices. The main idea is
to leverage the tensor decomposition technique to handle the CSI phase difference data. The proposed TensorBeat scheme first obtains CSI phase difference data between pairs of antennas at the WiFi receiver to
create CSI tensor data. Then Canonical Polyadic (CP) decomposition is applied to obtain the desired breathing signals. A stable signal matching algorithm is developed to find the decomposed signal pairs, and a peak
detection method is applied to estimate the breathing rates for multiple persons. Our experimental study
shows that TensorBeat can achieve high accuracy under different environments for multi-person breathing
rate monitoring.
General Terms: Health sensing, breathing rate estimation, tensor decomposition, stable roommate matching, commodity WiFi, channel state information, phase difference
1. INTRODUCTION
It is estimated that 100 million Americans suffer chronic health conditions such
as lung disorders, diabetes, and heart disease [Boric-Lubeke and Lubecke 2002].
About three-fourths of the total US healthcare cost is spent on dealing with these
health conditions. To reduce such costs, there is an increasing demand for longterm health monitoring in indoor environments. By tracking vital signs such as
breathing and heart beats, the patient’s physical health can be timely evaluated
and meaningful clues for medical problems can be provided [Rashidi and Cook 2013].
For example, monitoring breathing signals can help identify sleep disorders or
anomalies for patients, as well as decreasing sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS) for sleeping infants [Hunt and Hauck 2006]. Traditional approaches for
monitoring vital signs require patients to wear special devices, such as a capnometer [Mogue and Rantala 1988] to estimate breathing rate, or a pulse oximeter [Shariati and Zahedi 2005] on the finger to track heart beats. Recently, smartphones are used to estimate breathing rate by employing the built-in gyroscope, accelerometer [Aly and Youssef 2016], and microphone [Ren et al. 2015], and for physical
activity recognition using accelerometer [Tao et al. 2016]. This requires the patient to
place a smartphone near-by and wear sensors in the monitoring environment. Moreover, the readily available smartphone sensors such as accelerometer and gyroscope
This work is supported in part by the U.S. NSF under Grants CNS-1247955 and CNS-1320664, and by the
Wireless Engineering Research and Education Center (WEREC) at Auburn University. Author’s addresses:
X. Wang, C. Yang, and S. Mao, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Auburn University,
Auburn, AL 36849-5201 USA.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted
without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that
copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned
by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request
permissions from [email protected].
c YYYY ACM. 2157-6904/YYYY/01-ARTA $15.00
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/0000000.0000000
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:2
X. Wang et al.
can only monitor breathing rate for single person. Such existing approaches could be
expensive, inconvenient to use, and annoying even for a short period of time. An alternative approach is in need to provide a contact-free and long-term breathing monitoring at low costs.
Recently, several RF based systems for vital signs tracking are proposed, which employ wireless signal to monitor breathing-induced chest movements and are mainly
based on radar and WiFi techniques. For radar based vital signals monitoring, several techniques, such as the Doppler radar [Droitcour et al. 2009] and ultra-wideband
radar [Salmi and Molisch 2011], are used to track vital signs, which require special
hardware operated at high frequency and at a high cost. Moreover, the Vital-Radio system employs a frequency modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar to track breathing and heart rates [Adib et al. 2015]; it requires a customized hardware using a wide
bandwidth from 5.46 GHz to 7.25 GHz. For WiFi based vital signs monitoring, mmVital [Yang et al. 2016] can exploit the received signal strength (RSS) of 60 GHz millimeter wave (mmWave) signals for breathing and heart rate estimation. mmVital also operates with a larger bandwidth of about 7 GHz, and uses a customized hardware with
a mechanical rotator. Another technique UbiBreathe uses WiFi RSS for breathing rate
estimation, which, however, requires the device be placed in the line of sight (LOS)
path between the transmitter and the receiver [Abdelnasser et al. 2015].
Compared with RSS, channel state information (CSI) provides fine-grained channel information in the physical layer, which can now be read from modified device drivers for several off-the-shelf WiFi network interface cards (NIC), such as
the Intel WiFi Link 5300 NIC [Halperin. et al. 2010] and the Atheros AR9580
chipset [Xie et al. 2015]. Moreover, CSI includes both amplitude and phase values at
the subcarrier-level for orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) channels,
which is a more stable and accuracy representation of channel characteristics than
RSS, including the non-LOS (NLOS) components for small-scale fading. Recently, the
authors in [Liu et al. 2015] use the CSI amplitude data to monitor breathing and heart
signals, which requires the person to remain in the sleeping mode. However, the measured CSI phase data has not been fully exploited in prior works, largely due to random
phase fluctuation resulting from asynchronous times and frequencies of the transmitter and receiver. For multiple person breathing monitoring, because the reflected components in the received signal are from the chests of multiple persons, each moves
slightly due to breathing and the movements are independent. Thus, vital signs monitoring and estimation for multiple persons still remains a challenging and open problem.
In this paper, we propose to utilize CSI phase difference data between antenna pairs
to monitor the breathing rates of multiple persons. First, we show that when the person is in a stationary state, such as standing, sitting, or sleeping, the CSI phase difference data is highly stable in consecutively received packets, which can be leveraged
for extracting the small, periodic breathing signal hidden in the received WiFi signal. In fact, phase difference is more robust than amplitude, which usually exhibits
large fluctuations because of the attenuation over the link distance, obstacles, and the
multipath effect. Moreover, the phase difference data captures and preserves the periodicity of breathing, when the wireless signal is reflected from the patients’ chests. To
extract the weak breathing signal, and more important, to distinguish among multiple persons, we propose to employ a tensor decomposition method to handle the phase
difference data [Papalexakis et al. 2016; Luo et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2014]. We create the
CSI tensor data by increasing the dimension of CSI data from one to three, which can
be used to effectively separate different breathing signals in different clusters.
We present a system termed TensorBeat, Tensor decomposition for estimating multiple persons breathing Beats, by exploiting CSI phase difference data. TensorBeat
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:3
operates as follows. First, it obtains 60 CSI phase difference data from antenna pairs
1 and 2, and 2 and 3, at the receiver. Next, a data preprocessing procedure is applied
to the measured phase difference data, including data calibration and Hankelization.
In the data calibration phase, the direct current (DC) component and high frequency
noises are removed. In the Hankelization phase, a two dimensional Hankel matrix
is created based on the calibrated phase difference data from every subcarrier, and
the rank of the Hankel matrix is analyzed. Then, we adopt Canonical Polyadic (CP)
decomposition for estimating multiple persons breathing signs, and prove the uniqueness of the proposed CSI tensor. After CP decomposition, we obtain twice amount of
breathing signals, which, however, are randomly indexed. We thus design a stable signal matching algorithm (for the stable roommate problem [Irving 1985]) to identify the
decomposed signal pairs for each person. Finally, we combine the decomposed signals
in each pair and employ a peak detection method to estimate the breathing rate for
each person.
We implement TensorBeat on commodity 5 GHz WiFi devices and verify its performance with five persons over six months in different indoor environments, such as
a computer laboratory, a through-wall scenario, and a long corridor. The results show
that the proposed TensorBeat system can achieve high accuracy and high success rates
for multiple persons breathing rates estimation. Moreover, we demonstrate the robustness of the proposed TensorBeat system for monitoring multiple persons’ breathing
beats under a wide range of environmental parameters.
The main contributions of this paper are summarized as follows.
(1) We theoretically and experimentally verify the feasibility of leveraging CSI phase
difference for breathing monitoring. In particular, we analyze the measured phase
errors in detail and demonstrate that phase difference data is stable and can be
used to extract breathing signs. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to
leverage phase difference for multiple persons breathing rate estimation.
(2) We are also the first to apply tensor decomposition for RF sensing based vital signs
monitoring. We use the phase difference data to create a CSI tensor for all subcarrier at the three antennas of the WiFi receiver. We then incorporate CP decomposition to obtain the desired breathing signals. A stable signal matching algorithm is
developed to match the decomposed signals for each person, while a peak detection
method is used to estimate multiple persons’ breathing rates.
(3) We prototype the TensorBeat system with commodity 5 GHz WiFi devices and
demonstrate its superior performance in different indoor environments with extensive experiments. The results show that the proposed TensorBeat system can
achieve very high accuracy and high success rates for multiple persons breathing
rate estimation.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. The preliminaries and phase
difference analysis are provided in Section 2. We present the TensorBeat system design and performance analysis in Section 3 and verify its performance with extensive
experiments in Section 4. We provide the related work in Section 5. Section 6 concludes
this paper.
2. PRELIMINARIES AND PHASE DIFFERENCE INFORMATION
2.1. Tensor Decomposition Preliminaries
A tensor is considered as a multidimensional array [Kolda and Bader 2009]. The dimensions of the tensor are called as modes, and the order of the tensor is the number of the modes. For example, the N -order tensor is a N -mode tensor. Moreover, It
is noticed that a first-order tensor is a vector, a second-order tensor is a matrix, and
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:4
X. Wang et al.
a third-order tensor is a cubic structure. Higher-order tensors with (N ≥ 3) have a
wide range of applications such as data mining, brain data analysis, recommendation systems, wireless communications, computer vision, and healthcare and medical applications [Papalexakis et al. 2016]. For higher-order tensors, they face various
computational challenging because of the exponential increase in time and space complexity with the orders increase of tensors. This leads to the curse of dimensionality. Fortunately, tensor decomposition as one powerful tool is leveraged for alleviating the curve by decomposing high-order tensors into a limited number of factors.
Also, it can obtain hidden feature components, thus extracting physical insight of
higher-order tensors. Two main tensor decompositions are tucker decomposition and
CP decomposition [Kolda and Bader 2009]. We consider CP decomposition for multiple persons breathing rate estimation because it can easily obtain the unique solution [Kolda and Bader 2009]. On the other hand, we will provide some necessary definitions and equations of tensor decomposition, which can be used for our proposed
algorithm.
Definition 2.1. (Frobenius Norm of a Tensor). The Frobenius norm of a tensor χ ∈
KI1 ×I2 ×···×IN is the square root of the sum of the squares of all its elements, which is
defined by
v
u I1 I2
IN
X
uX X
t
kχkF =
(1)
x2i1 ,i2 ···iN .
···
i1 =1 i2 =1
iN =1
where K stands for R or C.
Definition 2.2. (Kronecker Product). The Kronecker product of matrics A ∈ KI×J
and B ∈ KM×N is denoted as A ⊗ B. The result is an (IM ) × (JN ) matrix, which is
defined by
a11 B a12 B . . . a1J B
a21 B a22 B . . . a2J B
A⊗B =
.
(2)
..
..
..
...
.
.
.
aI1 B aI2 B . . . aIJ B
Definition 2.3. (Khatri-Rao Product). The Khatri-Rao product of A ∈ KI×J and
B ∈ KM×J is denoted as A ⊙ B. It is the column-wise Kronecker product with the size
(IM ) × J, which is defined by
(3)
A ⊙ B = [a1 ⊗ b1 , a2 ⊗ b2 , · · · , aJ ⊗ bJ ].
I×J
Definition 2.4. (Hadamard product). The Hadamard product of A ∈ K
and B ∈
KI×J is denoted as A ∗ B. It is the elementwise matrix product with the size I × J,
which is defined by
a11 b11 a12 b12 . . . a1J b1J
a21 b21 a22 b22 . . . a2J b2J
A∗B =
.
(4)
..
..
..
...
.
.
.
aI1 bI1 aI2 bI2 . . . aIJ bIJ
2.2. Channel State Information Preliminaries
OFDM is an effective wireless transmission technique widely used in many wireless systems, including WiFi (such as IEEE 802.11 a/g/n) and LTE [Wang et al. 2016;
Xu et al. 2014]. The OFDM system partitions the wireless channel into multiple
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:5
orthogonal subcarriers, where data is transmitted over all the subcarriers by using the same modulation and coding scheme (MCS) to combat frequency selective
fading. With modified device driver for off-the-shelf NICs, such as the Intel 5300
NIC [Halperin. et al. 2010] and the Atheros AR9580 chipset [Xie et al. 2015], the CSI
data can be extracted, which represents fine-grained physical (PHY) information.
Moreover, CSI captures rich wireless channel characteristics such as shadowing fading, distortion, and the multipath effect.
The WiFi OFDM channel can be regarded as a narrowband flat fading channel,
which can be expressed in the frequency domain as
~ =H·X
~ +N
~,
Y
(5)
~ denote the received and transmitted wireless signal vectors, respecwhere Y~ and X
~ is the additive white Gaussian noise, and H represents the channel frequency
tively, N
~ and X.
~
response, which can be estimated from Y
Although the WiFi OFDM system can use 56 subcarriers for data transmission on a
20 MHz channel, the Intel 5300 NIC device driver can only provide CSI for 30 out of the
56 subcarriers using the channel bonding technique. The channel frequency response
of subcarrier i, denoted by Hi , is a complex value, given as
Hi = Ii + jQi = |Hi | exp (j 6 Hi ),
(6)
where Ii and Qi are the in-phase component and quadrature component, respectively;
|Hi | and 6 Hi are the amplitude and phase response of subcarrier i, respectively.
For indoor environments with multipath components, the channel frequency response of subcarrier i, Hi , can also be written as
Hi =
K
X
rk · e−j2πfi τk ,
(7)
k=0
where K is the number of multipath components, and rk and τk are the attenuation
and propagation delay on the kth path, respectively.
Traditionally, the multipath components are regarded as harmful for wireless communications, since they cause the delay spread (requires guard times) and large fluctuation of received wireless signal (harder to demodulate). For indoor localization systems, multiple signals will be received from a single transmission, including one LOS
signal and many reflected signals. It is a challenging problem to detect the LOS signal
from the mixed multipath components, which is indicative of the direction of the transmitter [Yang et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2014]. In this paper, however, we take a different
view and show that the multiple signals reflected from the chests of multiple persons
can be useful for estimating their breathing rates simultaneously.
2.3. Phase Difference Information
As discussed, we exploit phase difference information for breathing rate estimation.
We verify that the phase difference values between two adjacent antennas are stable
for consecutively received packets in this section. In fact, the extracted phase information from the Intel 5300 NIC is high random and cannot be used for breathing
monitoring. This is because of the asynchronous times and frequencies of transmitter and receiver NICs. Recently, two effective techniques are proposed for CSI phase
calibration, to remove the unknown random components in CSI phase data. The first
technique is to take a linear transformation for the CSI phase data over all the subcarirers [Qian et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2015]. The other technique is
to use the phase difference between two adjacent antennas in the 2.4 GHz band, and to
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:6
X. Wang et al.
remove the measured average of phase difference for LOS recognition [Wu et al. 2015].
It can be seen that these techniques only obtain the stable phase information and
phase difference data with a zero mean, respectively, but none of these are useful for
breathing rate estimation.
To prove the stability of measured CSI phase difference in the 5 GHz band, we write
b i , as [Speth et al. 1999]
the measured phase of subcarrier i, denoted as 6 H
6
b i = 6 Hi + (λp + λs )mi + λc + β + Z,
H
(8)
where Hi is the true phase of CSI data, mi is the subcarrier index of subcarrier i,
β is the initial phase offset at the phase-locked loop (PLL), Z is the measurement
environment noise, and λp , λs and λc are the phase errors from the packet boundary
detection (PBD), the sampling frequency offset (SFO), and central frequency offset
(CFO), respectively [Speth et al. 1999], which are given by
λp = 2π ∆t
N′
(9)
λ = 2π( T T−T ) TTus n
s
λc = 2π∆f Ts n,
6
where ∆t is the packet boundary detection delay, N is the FFT size, T ′ and T are the
sampling periods from the receiver and the transmitter, respectively, Tu is the length
of the data symbol, Ts is the total length of the data symbol and the guard interval,
n is the sampling time offset for the current packet, and ∆f is the center frequency
′
difference between the transmitter and receiver. In fact, the values of ∆t, T T−T , n, ∆f ,
and β in (8) and (9) are unknown, and the values of λp , λs , and λc can be different
for different packets. Thus, we cannot obtain the true phase 6 Hi of CSI data from
measured phase values.
However, the measured phase difference on subcarrier i is stable, which can be employed for breathing rate estimation. Since the three antennas (radios) of the Intel
5300 NIC are on the same NIC, they use the same system clock and the same downconverter frequency. The measured CSI phases on subcarrier i from two adjacent antennas have the same λp , λs , λc , and mi . The phase difference can be computed as
b i = ∆6 Hi + ∆β + ∆Z,
∆6 H
(10)
where ∆6 Hi is the true phase difference of subcarrier i, ∆β is the unknown difference in phase offsets, which is a constant [Gjengset et al. 2014], and ∆Z is the noise
difference. Since in (10), the random values ∆t, ∆f , and n are all removed, the phase
difference becomes more stable for back-to-back received packets. As an example, we
plot in Fig. 1 the phase differences (marked as red dots) and the single antenna phases
(marked as gray crosses) read from the 3rd subcarrier for 500 consecutively received
packets. It can be seen that the single antenna phase is nearly uniformly distributed
between 0◦ and 360◦ . However, all the phase difference data concentrate in a small
sector between 330◦ and 340◦ , which is significantly more stable than phase data.
Breathing rate estimation for multiple persons is a challenging problem, because
the reflected components in the received signal are from the chests of multiple persons,
each moves slightly due to breathing and the movements are independent. Thus, the
peak-to-peak detection method cannot be effective for detecting the multiple breathing
signals from the received signal. The aggregated breathing signal from multiple persons is not a clearly periodic signal anymore. Fig. 2 shows the detected breathing signals for one person (the upper plot) and three persons (the lower plot). We can see that
for one person, the breathing signal exhibits a noticeable periodicity. So the breathing rate can be estimated by peak detection after removing the noise. However, the
aggregated breathing signal of three persons does not show noticeable periodicity for
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:7
90
20
120
15
60
10
150
30
5
180
0
330
210
300
240
270
Fig. 1. The phase differences (marked by red dots) and the single antenna phases (marked by gray crosses)
of the 3rd subcarrier for 500 back-to-back packets, plotted in the polar coordinate system.
packet 400 to 600. Traditional FFT based methods can transform the received signal
from the time domain to the frequency domain to estimate the breathing frequencies
from multiple persons. Fig. 3 shows the breathing rate estimation for one person (the
upper plot) and three persons (the lower plot) with the FFT method. We can see that
the estimated frequency for one person is 0.2 Hz, which is almost the same as the true
breathing rate. However, for three-person breathing rate estimation, the FFT curve
only has two peaks, and the estimated breathing rates are much less accurate. In particular, the third peak cannot be estimated. This is because FFT based methods require
a larger window size to improve the frequency resolution. We show that the proposed
tensor decomposition based method is highly effective for multi-person breathing rate
estimation in the following section.
3. THE TENSORBEAT SYSTEM
3.1. TensorBeat System Architecture
The main idea of the proposed TensorBeat system is to estimate multi-person breathing rates by employing a tensor decomposition method. To obtain CSI tensor data, we
first create a two dimensional Hankel matrix with phase difference data from backto-back received packets extracted from each subcarrier at each antenna. Then, by
leveraging the phase differences from the 60 subcarriers, i.e., that between antennas
1 and 2, and between antennas 2 and 3, we can construct the third dimension of the
CSI tensor data. The TensorBeat system will then leverage the created CSI tensor
to estimate multi-person breathing signs. Our approach is motivated by two observations. First, for stationary modes of a person, such as standing, sitting, or sleeping, CSI phase difference from consecutively received packets is highly stable. It can
thus be useful for extracting the periodic breathing signals. Second, the tensor decomposition method can effectively estimate multi-person breathing beats. We create
the CSI tensor data by increasing the dimension of CSI data, from one dimension to
three dimensions. The higher dimension CSI data is helpful to effectively separate
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:8
X. Wang et al.
Breathing Curve of One Person
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
600
Breathing Curve of Three Persons
-1
-1.5
-2
0
100
200
300
400
Packet Index
FFT Magnitude
FFT Magnitude
Fig. 2. Detected breathing signals for one person (the upper plot) and three persons (the lower plot).
Breathing Rate Estimation for One Person
20
10
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
Breathing Rate Estimation for Three Persons
40
20
0
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 3. Breathing rate estimation for one person (the upper plot) and three persons (the lower plot) based
on FFT.
different breathing signals by forming different clusters. This strategy is similar to
the kernel method in traditional machine learning, such as support vector machine
(SVM) [Wu et al. 2007] or multiple hidden layers in deep learning [LeCun et al. 2015;
Wang et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2017].
As shown in Fig. 4, the TensorBeat system consists of four main modules: Data Extraction, Data Preprocessing, CP Decomposition, Signal Matching, and Breathing Rate
Estimation. For Data Extraction, TensorBeat obtains 60 CSI phase difference data, 30
between antennas 1 and 2, and 30 between antennas 2 and 3, at the receiver with
an off-the-shelf WiFi device. The Data Preprocessing module includes data calibration and Hankelization. Data calibration is implemented to remove the DC component
and high frequency noises. Hankelization is to create a two dimensional Hankel matrix with phase difference data from each subcarrier for back-to-back received packets.
The rank of the constructed Hankel matrix is then analyzed. We next apply CP decomposition to estimate multiple persons’ breathing signals, and prove the uniqueness
of the proposed CSI tensor. For Signal Matching, we first compute the autocorrelation
function of the decomposed signals, and incorporate a stable roommate matching algorithm to identify the decomposed signal pairs for each person, where a preference
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:9
)&1&#$,(3,2.(''*-4
)&1&#/01,&.1*2!"#$%&'(#)*++(,(-.(#
/01,&.1*2-
';
6.
&,
,*(
,'
<
<
<
)&1&# &5*6,&1*2-
3&.8(1'
<
$#)(.2:32'*1*2<
';
6.
&,
,*(
,'
7&-8(5*9&1*2-
7&-8(5#
:&1,*0
=#͑ ͑ ͑ ͑ ͑ =
!?@
!>
͑͑͑͑͑͑͑͑͑͑
!*4-&5#B&1.%*-4#A542,*1%:
D,(&1%*-4#/'1*:&1*2!*4-&5#C;'*2-
!1&65(#@22::&1(#
B&1.%*-4
$(&8#)(1(.1*2-
!?@
+>
͑͑͑͑͑͑
A;12.2,,(5&1*2-
͑͑͑͑͑͑
!>
+@
Fig. 4. The TensorBeat system architecture.
list is computed with the dynamic time warping (DTW) values of the autocorrelation
signals. For Breathing Rate Estimation, we combine the decomposed signals in each
pair and use the peak detection method to compute the breathing rate for each person.
In the remainder of this section, we present the design and analysis of each module
of the TensorBeat system in detail.
3.2. Data Preprocessing
3.2.1. Data Calibration. We use a 20 Hz sampling rate to obtain 60 CSI phase difference
data, 30 between antennas 1 and 2, and 30 between antennas 2 and 3, at the receiver
with an off-the-shelf WiFi device at 5 GHz for data extraction. Then, data calibration
is applied to remove the DC component and high frequency noises. Because the DC
component is also considered as a kind of signal, which may affect CSI tensor decomposition, TensorBeat adopts the Hampel filter to remove the DC component. Unlike
traditional data calibration approaches that only remove the high frequency noise, we
use the Hampel Filter for detrending the original CSI phase difference data to remove
DC component. In fact, the Hampel Filter, which is set as a large sliding window with
150 samples wide and a small threshold of 0.001, is firstly used to extract the basic
trend of the original data. Then, the detrended data is generated by subtracting the
basic trend data from the original data. We also utilize the Hampel Filter to reduce
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:10
X. Wang et al.
Original Phase Difference
-0.5
-1
-1.5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
500
600
Calibrated Phase Difference
0.2
0
-0.2
-0.4
0
100
200
300
400
Packet Index
Fig. 5. Data calibration: an example.
the high frequency noise by using a sliding window of 6 samples wide and a threshold
of 0.01.
Fig. 5 presents an example of data calibration. We can see that the original phase
differences of all the subcarriers have both a DC component and high frequency noises.
With the proposed data calibration approach, it can be seen that the DC components
are readily removed and all the subcarriers demonstrate a similar calibrated signal
over the 600 packet range with low noise. Such calibrated signal will then be used for
estimating the breathing rates of multiple persons.
3.2.2. Hankelization. After data calibration, we obtain the CSI phase difference data
matrix with a dimension of (number of packets × number of subcarriers). We then
employ a Hankelization method to transform the large CSI matrix into a CSI tensor by
expanding the packets into an additional dimension [Lathauwer 2011]. Specifically, we
rearrange the signals of each subcarrier into a 2-D Hankel matrix, so that the signals
from all the 60 subcarriers can be considered as a 3-Dimensional tensor. Define Hr as
the constructed Hankel matrix with the size I × J for subcarrier r, which is created by
mapping N packets onto the Hankel matrix with N = I +J −1. We consider the Hankel
matrix with size I = J = N2+1 . We thus obtain the Hankel matrix Hr for subcarrier r,
as
hr (0)
hr (1) . . . hr ( N2+1 − 1)
hr (1)
hr (2) . . .
hr ( N2+1 )
Hr =
(11)
,
..
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
hr ( N2+1 − 1) hr ( N2+1 ) . . .
hr (N − 1)
where hr (i) is the calibrated phase difference data from subcarrier r for packet i. In our
experiments, we set N = 599 and I = J = 300. To determine the number of components
needed for CSI tensor decomposition, we provide the following theorem for estimating
R breathing signals.
T HEOREM 3.1. If there are R breathing signals in an indoor monitoring environment, the constructed Hankel matrix H r for subcarrier r has a rank of 2R when noise
is negligible.
P ROOF. When analyzing signal data structure, we assume the noise is negligible.
Moreover, let the ith breathing signal be represented as Si (t) = Ai cos(wi t + ϕi ). The
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:11
observed signal from a subcarrier can be represented by [Cichocki et al. 2015]
Y (t) =
i=R
X
Ki Si (t) =
i=R
X
(12)
K̂i cos(wi t + ϕi ),
i=1
i=1
where Ki is the coefficient for breathing signal i and the new coefficient K̂i = Ki Ai .
The ith component of Y (t), K̂i cos(wi t + ϕi ), can be decomposed using Euler’s formula.
We have
K̂i
K̂i
exp(j(wi t + ϕi )) +
exp(j(−wi t − ϕi ))
2
2
K̂i
K̂i
exp(jϕi ) exp(jwi t) +
exp(−jϕi ) exp(−jwi t).
(13)
=
2
2
Each breathing signal can be separated into two exponential signals with different
coefficients. Combining all the R breathing signals, we have
!
R
X
K̂i
K̂i
Y (t) =
exp(jϕi ) exp(jwi t) +
exp(−jϕi ) exp(−jwi t)
2
2
i=1
K̂i cos(wi t + ϕi ) =
=
2R
X
K̃i Zit ,
(14)
i=1
where the updated signal Zit is denoted as Zit = exp(±jwi t), and K̃i = K̂2i exp(±jϕi )
is its coefficient. For packets received at discrete times, we represent the received
P2R
n
signal as Y (n) =
i=1 K̃i Zi . Note that the combined signal can be considered as
an exponential polynomial with 2R different exponential terms. Map signal Y (n) for
n = 1, 2, · · · , N into a Hankel matrix with size I = J = N2+1 , we have
P
N +1
P2R
P2R
−1
2R
K̃i Zi1 · · ·
K̃i Zi 2
K̃i Zi0
i=1
i=1
i=1
P
N +1
P2R
P2R
2R
2
1
2
···
i=1 K̃i Zi
i=1 K̃i Zi
i=1 K̃i Zi
Hr =
(15)
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
·
·
·
.
N +1
N +1
P2R
P2R
P2R
N −1
2 −1
2
K̃
Z
·
·
·
K̃
Z
K̃
Z
i
i
i
i
i
i
i=1
i=1
i=1
We can see that the Hankel matrix can be decomposed with Vandermonde decomposition [Lathauwer 2011], as
T
H r = V r · diag(K̃1 , K̃1 , · · · , K̃2R ) · Ṽ r ,
where the Vandermode matrices V r ∈ K
1
Z1
..
V r = Ṽ r =
.
N +1
2 −1
Z1
N +1
2 ×2R
and Ṽ r ∈ K
1
Z2
..
.
N +1
2 −1
Z2
···
···
···
N +1
2 ×2R
1
Z2R
..
.
N +1
2 −1
· · · Z2R
(16)
are given by
.
(17)
Because a Vandermode matrix is full rank, which is obtained by different poles, the
rank of the Hankel matrix generated by R breathing signals is 2R.
According to Theorem 3.1, 2R signal components is required to separate the R
breathing signals.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:12
X. Wang et al.
Next we consider the influence of measurement noise on the Hankel matrix H r .
Because of noise, the Hankel matrix Hr is actually a full-rank matrix. However, Theorem 3.1 shows that the rank of the combined breathing signal is 2R, meaning that the
first 2R weighted decomposed components are much stronger than the remaining ones
as long as the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is not very low. This shows that the Hankel matrix structure can be used to effectively separate breathing signals from white
noise. Actually, the different signals will be well denoised and separated by using tensor decomposition, as to be discussed in Section 3.3.
3.3. Canonical Polyadic Decomposition
Once the CSI tensor is ready, we apply CP decomposition to estimate multiple persons’
breathing signals. With CP decomposition, the CSI tensor data can be approximated
as the sum of 2R rank-one tensors according to Theorem 3.1. Denote χ ∈ KI×J×K as a
third-order CSI tensor, which can be obtained by the sum of three-way outer products
as [Kolda and Bader 2009; Papalexakis et al. 2016]
χ≈
2R
X
(18)
ar ◦ b r ◦ cr ,
r=1
where ar , br , cr are the vectors at the rth position for the first, second, and third dimension, respectively, and 2R is the number of decomposition components, which is the
approximation rank of the tensor based on CP decomposition [Sun and Kumar 2014;
Sun and Kumar 2015]. Their outer product is defined by
for all i, j, k.
(ar ◦ br ◦ cr )(i, j, k) = ar (i)br (j)cr (k),
(19)
I×2R
We consider factor matrices A = [a1 , a2 , · · · , a2R ] ∈ K
, B = [b1 , b2 , · · · , b2R ] ∈
KJ×2R , and C = [c1 , c2 , · · · , c2R ] ∈ KK×2R as the combination of vectors from rankone components. Moreover, define X(1) ∈ KI×JK , X(2) ∈ KJ×IK , and X(3) ∈ KK×IJ
as 1-mode, 2-mode, and 3-mode matricization of CSI tensor χ ∈ KI×J×K , respectively,
which are obtained by fixing one mode and arranging the slices of the rest of the modes
into a long matrix [Kolda and Bader 2009]. Then, we can write the three matricized
forms as
X(1) ≈ A(C ⊙ B)T ,
(20)
T
(21)
T
(22)
X(2) ≈ B(C ⊙ A) ,
X(3) ≈ C(B ⊙ A) ,
where ⊙ denotes the Khatri-Rao product.
When the number of components 2R is given, we apply the Alternating Least
Squares (ALS) algorithm, the most widely used algorithm for CP decomposition [Kolda and Bader 2009]. To decompose the CSI tensor, we minimize the square
sum of the differences between the CSI tensor χ and the estimated tensor.
min
A,B,C
χ−
2R
X
2
ar ◦ b r ◦ cr
r=1
.
(23)
F
Note that (23) is not convex. However, the ALS algorithm can effectively solve the
problem by fixing two of the factor matrices, to reduce the problem to a linear least
squares problem with the third factor matrix as variable. If we fix B and C, we can
rewrite problem (23) as
min X(1) − A(C ⊙ B)T
A
2
F
.
(24)
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:13
We can derive the optimal solution to problem (24) as A = X(1) [(C ⊙ B)T ]† . Applying
the property of pseudoinverse of the Khatri-Rao product, it follows that
A = X(1) (C ⊙ B)(C T C ∗ B T B)† ,
(25)
where ∗ denotes the Hadamard product. This equation only requires computing the
pseudoinverse of a 2R × 2R matrix rather than a JK × 2R matrix. Note that R is
much smaller than J and K, thus the computing complexity can be greatly reduced.
Similarly, we can obtain the optimal solutions for B and C as
B = X(2) (C ⊙ A)(C T C ∗ AT A)†
T
T
†
C = X(3) (B ⊙ A)(B B ∗ A A) .
(26)
(27)
Applying ALS to CP decomposition, we obtain matrices A, B, and C. To guarantee
the effectiveness of the decomposed components, we next examine the uniqueness of
CP decomposition. The basic theorem on the uniqueness of CP decomposition is given
in [Kolda and Bader 2009], which is provided in the following.
FACT 1. For tensor χ with rank L, if kA + kB + kC ≥ 2L + 2, then the CP decomposition of χ is unique, where kA , kB , and kC denote the k-rank of matrix A, B, C,
respectively. Here k-rank means the maximum value k such that any k columns are
linearly independent [Kolda and Bader 2009].
Based on Fact 1, we have the following theorem for the CSI tensor.
T HEOREM 3.2. For the proposed CSI tensor χ with rank 2R, the CP decomposition
of χ is unique.
P ROOF. The proposed CSI tensor χ is created by K Hankel matrix, where the
rth Hankel matrix H r is rank-2R according to Theorem 3.1. Thus, for the k-rank
of the matrices A and B, we have kA = 2R and kB = 2R. On the other hand, because phase differences of subcarriers between antennas 1 and 2, and antennas 2
and 3 are independent, the k-rank of matrix C has kC ≥ 2. Thus, the expression is
kA + kB + kC ≥ 2R + 2R + 2 = 2(2R) + 2, which satisfies the conditions in Theorem 1.
This proofs the theorem.
Theorem 3.2 indicates that the CP decomposition of the created CSI tensor is unique,
which can be used to effectively estimate multiple breathing rates. In the proposed
TensorBeat system, we leverages the matrix A = [a1 , a2 , · · · , a2R ] as decomposed signals S1 , S2 , · · · , S2R . For example, Fig. 6 shows the results of CP decomposition for CSI
tensor data from three persons (R = 3). We can see that there are six signals. Moreover, signals 1 and 2 are similar, signals 3 and 5 are similar, and signals 4 and 6 are
similar. This is because CP decomposition cannot guarantee that similar signals are
located in adjacent locations (i.e., the output signals are randomly indexed). Thus, we
need to identify the signal pairs among the decomposed signals for each person, which
will be addressed in Section 3.4.
3.4. Signal Matching Algorithm
The CP decomposition of CSI tensor data yields 2R decomposed signals, i.e.,
S1 , S2 , · · · , S2R , which, however, are randomly indexed. In this section, we propose a
signal matching algorithm to pair the two similar decomposed signals that belong to
the same person. The main idea is to leverage the autocorrelation to strengthen the
periodicity of decomposed signals and use the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) method
to compute the similarity value for any pair of signals. Finally, we apply the stableroommate matching algorithm to pair the decomposed signals for each person, using
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:14
X. Wang et al.
0.2
6
0
5
4
-0.2
0
3
100
2
200
Packet Index
300
Signal Index
1
Fig. 6. CP decomposition results for a CSI tensor of three persons.
2
6
0
-2
0
5
4
100
3
200
300
400
Packet Index
2
500
600
Signal Index
1
Fig. 7. Autocorrelation of the decomposed breathing signals.
the DTW values as the closeness metric. We introduce the proposed signal matching
algorithm in the following.
3.4.1. Autocorrelation and Dynamic Time Warping. After CP decomposition of CSI tensor
data, we first compute the autocorrelation function of the 2R decomposed signals to
strengthen their periodicity. We evaluate the autocorrelation function of the decomposed signals for two reasons. The first is that the autocorrelation of a decomposed
signal can increase the data length, which helps to improve the accuracy of the peak
detection. Second, because the decomposed signals have phase shift and nonalignment,
using the autocorrelation of decomposed signals can reduce such shifts and strengthen
the periodicity of the decomposed signals. Fig. 7 shows the autocorrelation of the decomposed breathing signals produced by CP decomposition. We can see that each autocorrelation signal exhibits a more obvious periodicity than that of the original decomposition signals. Moreover, the data length is increased from 300 to 600.
Furthermore, we employ the DTW approach to measure the distance between any
pair of autocorrelation signals, which is different from the Euclidean distance method
that computes the sum of distances from each value on one curve to the corresponding
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:15
value on the other curve. Moreover, the Euclidean distance method believes that two
autocorrelation signals with the same length are different as long as one of them has
a small shift. However, DTW can automatically identify these shifts and provide the
similar distance measurement between two autocorrelation signals by aligning the
corresponding time series, thus overcoming the limitation of the Euclidean distance
method.
With the autocorrelation signals, we design the DTW method for measuring their
pairwise distance. Given two autocorrelation signals and a cost function, the DTW
method seeks an alignment by matching each point in the first autocorrelation signal
to one or more points in the second signal, thus minimizing the cost function for all
points [Wang and Katabi 2013; Salvador and Chan 2004; Salvador and Chan 2007].
To reduce the computational complexity of DTW, we apply downsampling to the two
autocorrelation signals, which leads to a reduced number of packets N ′ . Then, consider two downsampled autocorrelation signals Pi = [Pi (0), Pi (1), · · · , Pi (N ′ − 1)] and
Pj = [Pj (0), Pj (1), · · · , Pj (N ′ − 1)], we need to find a warping path W = [w1 , w2 , · · · , wL ],
where L is the length of the path, and the lth element of the warping path is
wl = (ml , nl ), where m and n are the packet index for the two downsampled autocorrelation signals. The objective is to minimize the total cost function by implementing
the non-linear mapping between two downsampled autocorrelation signals Pi and Pj .
The formulated problem is given by
min
L
X
kPi (ml ) − Pj (nl )k
(28)
l=1
s.t.
(m1 , n1 ) = (0, 0)
(mL , nL ) = (N ′ − 1, N ′ − 1)
ml ≤ ml+1 ≤ ml + 1
nl ≤ nl+1 ≤ nl + 1.
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
The objection function is to minimize the distance between two downsampled autocorrelation signals. The first and second constraints are boundary constraints, which
require that the warping path starts at Pi (0) and Pj (0) and ends at Pi (N ′ − 1) and
Pj (N ′ − 1). This can guarantee all points of the two downsampled autocorrelation signals are used for measuring their distance, thus avoiding to use only local data. Furthermore, the third and fourth constraints are monotonic and marching constraints,
which require that there be no cycles for wi and wj in the warping path and the path
is increased with the maximum 1 at each step.
We apply dynamic programming to solve problem (28), to obtain the minimum
distance warping path between two downsampled autocorrelation signals. We consider a two-dimensional cost matrix C with size N ′ × N ′ , whose element C(ml , nl ) is
the minimum distance warping path for two downsampled autocorrelation signals
Pi = [Pi (0), Pi (1), · · · , Pi (ml )] and Pj = [Pj (0), Pj (1), · · · , Pj (nl )]. We design the recurrence equation in dynamic programming as follows.
C(ml , nl ) = kPi (ml ) − Pj (nl )k + min [C(ml − 1, nl ), C(ml , nl − 1), C(ml − 1, nl − 1)]. (33)
By filling all elements of the cost matrix C, the value C(N ′ − 1, N ′ − 1) can be computed
as the DTW value between the two downsampled autocorrelation signals. The time
complexity is O(N ′2 ). Fig. 8 shows the DTW results for downsampled autocorrelation
signals 4 and 6 (the upper plot), and downsampled autocorrelation signals 4 and 3 (the
N
lower plot), where we set the downsampling number of packets as N ′ = 10
= 60. It
can be seen that downsampled autocorrelation signals 4 and 6 have a smaller DTW
value (i.e., 3.65) than downsampled autocorrelation signals 4 and 3 (i.e., 13.7). That is,
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:16
X. Wang et al.
DTW Value with 3.6500
3
2
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
50
60
DTW Value with 13.7013
3
2
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
Packet Index
Fig. 8. DTW results for downsampled autocorrelation signals 4 and 6 (the upper plot), and downsampled
autocorrelation signal 4 and 3 (the lower plot), respectively.
signals 4 and 6 are more similar, and more likely to belong to the same person. We also
find that the downsampled autocorrelation signals have a high similarity in the center
than that on the boundary, and it can reduce the phase shift values. Thus, the DTW
value is a good measure of the distance between two downsampled autocorrelation
signals. We need to compute the DTW values for all the downsampled autocorrelation
signal pairs, which are then used in stable roommate matching.
3.4.2. Stable Roommate Matching. Since the CP decomposed signals are randomly indexed (see Fig. 7), we need to identify the pair for each person. With the DTW values for all downsampled autocorrelation signal pairs, we can model this problem as a
stable roommate matching problem [Irving 1985; Feng et al. 2015b; Feng et al. 2015a].
There are a group of 2R signals, and each signal maintains a preference list of all
other signals in the group, where the preference value for another signal is the inverse of the corresponding DTW value (i.e., distance). The problem is to pair the signals, such that there is no such a pair of signals that both of them have a more desired selection than their current selection, i.e., to find a stable matching [Irving 1985;
Feng et al. 2015b; Feng et al. 2015a]. The proposed signal matching algorithm is presented in Algorithm 1.
We first compute the autocorrelation of all decomposed signals. Then each autocorrelation signal populates its preference list with other autocorrelation signals according
to the DTW values. The stable roommate matching algorithm is executed in two steps.
In step 1, each signal proposes to other signals according to its preference list. If a signal m receives a proposal from another signal n, we implement the following strategy:
(i) signal m rejects signal n if it has a better proposal from another signal; (ii) signal
m accepts signal n’s proposal if it is better than all other proposals that signal m currently holds. Moreover, signal n stops to propose when its proposal is accepted, while it
needs to continue to propose to other signals if being rejected. This strategy is implemented in step 1 of the signal matching algorithm, where we use f inish f lag to mark
whether the current signal num is accepted or not. Moreover, variables accept num and
propose num are used to record the current signal’s proposed number and proposing
number, respectively. Also, variable scan num is used to record the current scanning
signal number. After completing step 1, every signal holds a proposal or one signal
has been rejected by other signals (this case hardly happens in TensorBeat, because
the CP decomposition produces two very similar signals with high probability for each
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:17
ALGORITHM 1: Signal Matching Algorithm
Input: Decomposed signals: S1 , S2 , · · · , S2R .
Output: Matched signal pairs.
Compute autocorrelation of all decomposed signals;
Compute the DTW values for every pair of autocorrelation signals;
Each autocorrelation signal sets its preference list using the DTW values;
//step1;
for signal num = 1 : 2R do
Set f inish f lag = 0;
Set scan num = signal num;
while f inish f lag = 0 do
if the proposal is the first one then
Proposing signal’s propose num=the current choice;
Set f inish f lag = 1;
Proposed signal’s accept num = scan num;
else
if the signal prefers the former proposal then
Reject the current proposal symmetrically;
Propose to the next choice;
else
Accept the current proposal;
Reject the former proposal symmetrically;
scan num = proposed signal’s accept num;
Propose to the next choice;
end
end
end
end
for signal num = 1 : 2R do
Reject signals that have less than accept num in every preference list symmetrically;
end
//step2;
signal num = 1;
while signal num < 2R + 1 do
if propose num = accept num then
signal num=signal num+1;
else
Let p1 be a signal whose preference list contains more than one element;
while p sequence is not cyclic do
qi = the second preference of pi ’s current list;
pi+1 = the last preference of qi ’s current list;
end
Denote ps as the first element in the p sequence to be repeated and r as the length of
the circle;
for i = 1 : r do
Reject matching (qs+i−2 , ps+i−1 ) symmetrically;
end
signal num = 1;
end
end
Obtain signal matching pairs based on all processed preference lists;
person). Then, we need to delete some elements in all the preference lists based on the
following method, which is that if signal m is the first on signal n’s list , then signal n
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:18
X. Wang et al.
is the last on signal m’s list. For the proposed algorithm, every signal can reject signals
that have less than accept num in its preference list symmetrically (reject each other).
An example is shown in Fig. 6. According to the DTW values, signals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and
6 have their preference lists as (2, 3, 5, 6, 4), (1, 3, 5, 6, 4), (5, 1, 2, 6, 4), (6, 5, 3, 2, 1),
(3, 2, 1, 4, 6), and (4, 5, 3, 2, 1), respectively. When step 1 is executed, we have: Signal
1 proposes to 2, and signal 2 holds 1; Signal 2 proposes 1, and signal 1 holds; Signal
3 proposes to signal 5, and signal 5 holds; Signal 4 proposes to signal 6, and signal 6
holds; Signal 5 proposes to signal 3, and signal 3 holds; Signal 6 proposes to signal 4,
and signal 4 holds. It is easy to find three pairs (1,2), (3,5), and (4,6).
Although most of decomposed signals are paired in step 1, step 2 will still be necessary for the more challenging cases of much more breathing signals and NLOS environments. In step 2, we consider the reduced preference lists, where some of the
lists have more than one signals. By implementing step 2, we can reduce the preference lists such that each signal only holds one proposal. The main idea is that we
need to find some all-or-nothing cycles and symmetrically delete signals in the cycle
sequence by rejecting the first and last choice pairs. The signal in the cycle accepts the
secondary choice, thus obtaining a stable roommate matching. To find all-or-nothing
cycles, let p1 be a signal with a preference list that contains more than one element,
and generate the sequences such that qi = the second preference of pi ’s current list,
and pi+1 = the last preference of qi ’s current list. After the cycle sequence generation,
denote ps as the first element in the p sequence to be repeated. Then, we reject matching (qs + i − 2, ps + i − 1) for i = 1 to r symmetrically, where r is the length of the cycle.
Finally, we can obtain signal matching pairs based on all processed preference lists.
The computational complexity of Algorithm 1 is O(R2 ), because steps 1 and 2 each has
a complexity of O(R2 ), respectively.
3.5. Breathing Rate Estimation
3.5.1. Signal Fusion and Autocorrelation. After obtaining the outcomes of the signal
matching algorithm, TensorBeat next applies peak detection to estimate the breathing
rates for multiple persons. Comparing to the FFT method, a higher resolution in the
time domain can be achieved. To implement peak detection, we first need to combine
the decomposed signal pairs for each person into a single signal, by taking the average of the signal pairs. Averaging can decrease the variance of the decomposed signals
while preserving the same period. For example, Fig. 9 shows the fusion results based
on the outcome of the signal matching algorithm, where three smoothly decomposed
signals with different periods are obtained. To strengthen the accuracy of peak detection, we compute the autocorrelation function again for every fused signal. Fig. 10
shows the autocorrelation of the three fused signals. It can be seen that the length of
data is increased from 300 to 600 and the number of peaks of every signal are also
increased, which help to improve the estimation accuracy.
3.5.2. Peak Detection. Although breathing signal is generated by the small periodic
chest movement of inhaling and exhaling, the phase difference data can effectively
capture the breathing rate. Traditionally, estimation of breathing rates is achieved
with FFT based methods. However, the FFT approach may have limited accuracy, because the frequency resolution of breathing signals is based on the window size of
FFT. When the window size becomes larger, the accuracy will be higher, but the time
domain resolution will be reduced. Also see Figs. 2 and 3 for the limitation of the FFT
based approach for the multi-person scenario. Therefore, we leverage peak detection
instead in TensorBeat system to achieve accurate breathing rate estimation for each
of autocorrelations of fused signals.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:19
0.2
3
0
-0.2
0
2
50
100
Signal Index
150
200
Packet Index
250
300
1
Fig. 9. Fusion results based on the outcomes of the signal matching algorithm.
5
3
0
-5
0
2
100
200
300
Signal Index
400
Packet Index
500
600
1
Fig. 10. Autocorrelation of fused signals.
For peak detection, the traditional method based on amplitude needs to detect the
fake peak, which is not a real peak but has larger values than its two immediate neighboring points. To avoid the fake peak, a large moving window can be used to identify
the real peak based on the maximum breathing periodicity. This method is not robust,
which requires adjusting the window size. In TensorBeat, we only consider a smaller
moving window of 7 samples wide. This is because we leverage the Hankel matrix and
CP decomposition to smooth out the breathing curves, which hardly contains any fake
peaks. Then, for the ith autocorrelation curve of fused signal, we seek all the peaks by
determining whether or not the medium of the 7 samples in the moving window is the
maximum value. Finally, we consider the median of all peak-to-peak intervals as the
final period of the ith breathing signal, which is denoted as Ti . Finally, the estimated
breathing rates can be computed as fi = 60/Ti , for i = 1 to R.
4. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY
4.1. Experiment Configuration
In this section, we validate the TensorBeat performance with an implementation with
5 GHz Wi-Fi devices. To obtain 5 GHz CSI data, we use a desktop computer and a Dell
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:20
X. Wang et al.
laptop as access point and mobile device, respectively, both of which are equipped with
an Intel 5300 NIC. We use the desktop computer instead of the commodity routers,
because none is equipped with the Intel 5300 NIC. The operating system is Ubuntu
destop 14.04 LTS OS for both the access point and the mobile device. The PHY is the
IEEE 802.11n OFDM system with QPSK modulation and 1/2 coding rate. Moreover,
the access point is set in the monitor model and the distance between its two adjacent
antennas is approximately 2.68 cm, which is half of the wavelength of 5GHz WiFi.
Also, the mobile device is set in the injection model and uses one antenna to transmit
data. Moreover, we use omnidirectional antennas for both the receiver and transmitter
to estimate breathing signs beats. With the packet injection technique with LORCON
version 1, we can obtain 5 GHz CSI data from the three antennas of the receiver.
Our experimental study is with up to five persons over a period of six months. The
experimental scenarios include a computer laboratory, a through-wall scenario, and a
corridor, as shown in Fig. 11. The first scenario is within a 4.5 × 8.8 m2 laboratory,
where both single person and multi-person breathing rate estimation experiments are
conducted. There are lots of tables and desktop computers crowded in the laboratory,
which block parts of the LOS paths and form a complexity radio propagation environment. The second setup is a through-wall environment, where single person breathing
rate estimation is tested due to the relatively weaker signal reception. The person is
on the transmitter side, and the receiver is behind a wall in this experiment. The third
scenario is a long corridor of 20 m, where the maximum distance between the receiver
and transmitter is 11 m in the experiment. This scenario is still considered for single
person breathing rate monitoring. We use a NEULOG Respiration to record the ground
truths for single person breathing rates. The single person breathing rates estimation
can be easily implemented by removing the signal matching algorithm, because there
are only two decomposed signals after CP decomposition in this case. For muti-person
breathing rate estimation in the first scenario, all persons participating in the experiment record their breathing rates by using a metronome smartphone application with
1 bpm accuracy at the same time. We consider five persons are stationary for LOS and
NLOS environments for breathing monitoring. Moreover, there are no other persons
in the breathing measurement area.
For multi-person breathing rate estimation, we need to define a proper metric for
evaluating TensorBeat’s performance. For R estimated breathing rates [f1 , f2 , ...fR ],
the ith breathing rate estimation error, Ei , is defined as
Ei = fi − fˆi , for i = 1, 2, · · · , R,
(34)
where fˆi is the ground truth of the ith breathing rate. We also define a new metric
termed success rate, denoted as SR, which is defined as
SR =
N {maxi {Ei } < 2bpm}
× 100%,
N {E}
(35)
where N {maxi {Ei } < 2bpm} means the number of repeated experiments of the maximum breathing rate error less than 2 bpm, and N {E} is the number of repeated
experiments. We adopt the success rate metric because there are weak signals for
multi-person experiments in indoor experiments at different locations, and sometimes
a breathing signal may not be successfully detected [Wang et al. 2016].
4.2. Performance of Breathing Estimation
In Fig. 12, we present the cumulative distribution functions (CDF) of the estimation
errors for single person breathing rate detection for three different experiment scenarios. We can see that for TensorBeat, high estimation accuracy of breathing rates
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:21
'()*+#,--.(/01/+,-2)-,0*/,
&!&#
!"#
%!$#
3.4,.5.(/01/+,-2)-,0*/,
$!$#
Fig. 11. Experimental setup: computer laboratory, through-wall, and long corridor scenarios.
1
0.8
Laboratory
Corridor
Through-wall
CDF
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Estimation Error (bpm)
Fig. 12. Performance of single person breathing rate estimation in the computer laboratory, through-wall,
and long corridor scenarios.
can be achieved in all the three scenarios. The maximum estimation error is less than
0.9 bpm. Moreover, it is noticed that 50% of the tests for the computer laboratory experiment have errors less than aboout 0.19 bpm, while the tests for the corridor and
through-wall scenarios have errors less than approximately 0.25 bpm and 0.35 bpm,
respectively. Thus, the performances in the laboratory setting is better than that in
the corridor and through-wall scenarios. This is because the laboratory has a smaller
space and the breathing signal is stronger than that of other two cases with larger
attenuation due to the long distance and the wall.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:22
X. Wang et al.
1
0.8
CDF
0.6
One Person
Two Persons
Three Persons
Four Persons
Five Persons
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Estimation Error (bpm)
Fig. 13. Performance of breathing rate estimation for different number of persons (computer laboratory).
Fig. 13 presents the performance of breathing rate estimation for different number of
persons. It is noticed that higher accuracy is achieved for the single person test, where
approximately 96% of the test data have an estimation error less than 0.5 bpm. The
five-person test has the worse performance, where approximately 62% of the test data
have an estimation error less than 0.5 bpm. Moreover, we fine that the performances
of the two-person and three-person tests are similar, both of which can have an error
smaller than 0.5 bpm for 93% of the test data. Generally, when the number of persons
is increased, the performance of breathing rate estimation gets worse. In fact, when the
number of breathing signals is increased, the distortion of the mixed received signal
will become larger, thus leading to high estimation errors.
Fig. 14 plots the success rates for different number of persons. We find that although
the success rate for one person is the highest, there are still few of test data that
cannot obtain high accuracy breathing rates estimation. These test data should come
from different locations in the indoor environments, where parts of the received signals are severely distorted. In fact, we find that low phase difference usually occurs
when the SNR is low. On the other hand, we can see that breathing rate estimation
for two persons also has a high success rate, because the probability for two persons
to have exactly the same breathing rate is very low. When the number of persons is
increased, the chance of getting two close breathing rates becomes higher. Even in this
case, TensorBeat can still effectively separate them with a high success probability.
With the increase of the number of persons, the success rate for TensorBeat system
decreases. The reason is that each breathing rate is more likely to cover each other
and the strength of the received signal becomes lower. From Fig. 14, we can see that
the success rate is about 82.4% when the number of persons is five.
Fig. 15 shows the success rate for different sampling rates. In this experiment, there
are four persons and the window size is set to 30 s. From Fig. 15, we can see that
with the increase of the number of sampling rates, the success rate is also increased.
It is noticed that the success rates for 5 Hz and 30 Hz are approximately 70% and
90%, respectively. As the sampling rate is increased, the length of the data for CP
decomposition is increased for the 30 s window size case, which helps to improve the
estimation accuracy. Furthermore, we find that the performance becomes stable when
the sampling rate exceeds 20 Hz, indicating that a sampling rate of 20 Hz is sufficient
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:23
100
Success Rate (%)
80
60
40
20
0
1
2
3
4
5
The Number of Persons
Fig. 14. Success rates for different number of persons (computer laboratory).
100
Success Rate (%)
80
60
40
20
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Sampling Rate (Hz)
Fig. 15. Success rates for different sampling rates (computer laboratory).
for CP decomposition. Thus, we set the sampling rate to 20 Hz for the TensorBeat
experiments.
Fig. 16 plots the success rates for different window sizes. This experiment is for the
computer laboratory scenario with four persons and the sampling rate is set to 20 Hz.
From Fig. 16, we can see that the success rate is greatly increased by increasing the
window size of the Hankel matrix from 15 s to 30 s. This is because Hankelizaiton
will take half of the data to smooth the phase difference signal, which reduces the
resolution in the time domain. Thus, we need to increase the window size to improve
the estimation accuracy. Furthermore, the change of success rate is small for window
sizes from 30 s to 45 s. Thus, we select the window size of 30 s for the TensorBeat
experiments.
Finally we examine the impact of LOS and NLOS scenarios. The success rates are
plotted in Fig. 17. In this experiment, we consider the challenge condition of the NLOS
scenario, where all the persons stay on the LOS path between the transmitter and
receiver, i.e., they form a straight line and block each other. From Fig. 15, we find
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:24
X. Wang et al.
100
Success Rate (%)
80
60
40
20
0
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
The Size of Window (s)
Fig. 16. Success rates for different window sizes (computer laboratory).
100
LOS
NLOS
Success Rate (%)
80
60
40
20
0
2
3
4
5
The Number of Persons
Fig. 17. Success rates for (i) when multiple persons form a line in the LOS path between the transmitter
and receiver; (ii) when multiple persons are in scattered around (computer laboratory).
that the performances for LOS and NLOS are nearly the same for the cases of two
or three persons, where high estimation accuracy can be achieved. This is due to the
WiFi multipath effect, which is regarded harmful in general but becomes helpful in
breathing rate estimation when tensor decomposition is used. The breathing signal
of every person can still be captured at the receiver from the phase difference data.
However, when the number of the persons is further increased, the success rate will
decrease quickly. In fact, the strength of the breathing signals for some persons will
become too weak to be detected when there are too many people blocking each other.
5. RELATED WORK
This work is closely related to sensor based and RF signal based vital signs monitoring,
as well as CSI based indoor localization and human activity recognition, which are
discussed in the following.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:25
Sensor-based vital signs monitoring with wearable and smart devices employs the
special hardware attached the person body to monitor breathing and heart rate data.
The capnometer can measure carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in respired gases,
which are employed to monitor patients breathing rate in hospital. However, it is uncomforted for patients to wear them, which are thus leveraged in clinical environments [Mogue and Rantala 1988]. Photoplethysmography (PPG) is an optical technique to monitor the blood volume changes in the tissues by measuring light absorption changes, thus requiring the sensors attached to persons finger such as pulse
oximeters [Shariati and Zahedi 2005]. In addition, smartphone can use the camera to
detect light changes from the video frames which can extract the PPG signal to monitor the heart rate [Scully et al. 2010]. Moreover, the smartphones can also estimate
breathing rate by using the built-in accelerometer, gyroscope [Aly and Youssef 2016]
and microphone [Ren et al. 2015], which require persons to put smartphones near-by
and wear sensors for breathing monitoring. However, these techniques based on sensors cannot be applied for remote monitoring vital signs.
RF based systems for vital signs monitoring use wireless signals to track the
breathing-induced chest change of a person, which are mainly based on radar and WiFi
techniques. For radar based vital signals monitoring, Vital-Radio employs frequency
modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar to estimate breathing and heart rates, even
for two person subjects in parallel [Adib et al. 2015]. But the system requires a custom
hardware with a large bandwidth from 5.46 GHz to 7.25 GHz. For WiFi based vital
signs monitoring, UbiBreathe system employ WiFi RSS for breathing rate monitoring,
which, however, requires the device placed in the line of sight path between the transmitter and the receiver for estimating the breathing rate [Abdelnasser et al. 2015].
Moreover mmVital based on RSS can use 60 GHz millimeter wave (mmWave) signal for breathing and heart rates monitoring with the larger bandwidth about 7GHz,
which cannot monitor the longer distance and require high gain directional antennas
for the transmitter and the receiver [Yang et al. 2016][Gong et al. 2010]. Recently, the
authors leverage the amplitudes of CSI data to monitoring vital signs [Liu et al. 2015].
This work is mainly to track the vital signs when a person is sleeping, which is limited
for monitoring a maximum of two persons at the same time.
In additional to vital signs monitoring, recently, CSI based sensing systems have also been used for indoor localization and human activity recognition [Cushman et al. 2016]. CSI-based fingerprinting systems have been proposed to
obtain high localization accuracy. FIFS is the first work to uses the weighted average of
CSI amplitude values over multiple antennas for indoor localization [Xiao et al. 2012].
To exploit the diversity among the multiple antennas and subcarriers, DeepFi leverage
90 CSI amplitude data from the three antennas with a deep autoencoder network for
indoor localization [Wang et al. 2015]. Also, PhaseFi leverages calibrated CSI phase
data for indoor localization based on deep learning [Wang et al. 2015]. Different from
CSI-based fingerprinting techniques, SpotFi system leverages a super-resolution algorithm to estimate the angle of arrival (AoA) of multipath components for indoor
localization based on CSI data from three antennas [Kotaru et al. 2015]. On the other
hand, E-eyes system leverages CSI amplitude values for recognizing household activities such as washing dishes and taking a shower [Wang et al. 2014]. WiHear system
employs specialized directional antennas to measure CSI changes from lip movement
for determining spoken words [Wang et al. 2014]. CARM system considers a CSI based
speed model and a CSI based activity model to build the correlation between CSI data
dynamics and a given human activity [Wang et al. 2015]. Although CSI based sensing
are effective for indoor localization and activity recognitions, there are few works for
using CSI phase difference data to detect multiple persons behaviors at the same time.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:26
X. Wang et al.
The TensorBeat system is motivated by these interesting prior works. To the best
of our knowledge, we are the first to leverage CSI phase difference data for multiple
persons breathing rate estimation. We are also the first to employ tensor decomposition
for RF sensing based vital signs monitoring, which can be also employed for indoor
localization and human activity recognition.
6. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we proposed TensorBeat, tensor decomposition for estimating multiple
persons breathing beats with commodity WiFi. The proposed TensorBeat system employed CSI phase difference data to obtain the periodic signals from the movements
of multiple breathing chests by leveraging tensor decomposition. We implemented several signal processing methods including data preprocessing, CP decomposition, signal
matching algorithm, and peak detection in TensorBeat. We validate the performance
of TensorBeat with extensive experiments under three indoor environments. Our analysis and experimental study demonstrated that the proposed TensorBeat system can
achieve satisfactory performance for multiple persons breathing estimation.
REFERENCES
H. Abdelnasser, K. A. Harras, and M. Youssef. 2015. Ubibreathe: A Ubiquitous non-invasive WiFi-based
Breathing Estimator. In Proc. IEEE MobiHoc’15. ACM, Hangzhou, China, 277–286.
F. Adib, H. Mao, Z. Kabelac, D. Katabi, and R. Miller. 2015. Smart homes that monitor breathing and heart
rate. In Proc. ACM CHI’15. ACM, Seoul, Korea, 837–846.
H. Aly and M. Youssef. 2016. Zephyr: Ubiquitous Accurate multi-Sensor Fusion-based Respiratory Rate
Estimation Using Smartphones. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM’16. IEEE, San Francisco, CA, 1–9.
O. Boric-Lubeke and V.M. Lubecke. 2002. Wireless House Calls: Using Communications Technology for
Health Care and Monitoring. IEEE Microwave Mag. 3, 3 (Oct. 2002), 43–48.
A. Cichocki, D. P. Mandic, L. De Lathauwer, G. Zhou, Q. Zhao, C. F. Caiafa, and A. H. Phan. 2015. Tensor
decompositions for signal processing applications: From two-way to multiway component analysis. IEEE
Signal Processing Magazine 32, 2 (Mar. 2015), 145–163.
I. Cushman, D. B. Rawat, A. Bhimraj, and M. Fraser. 2016. Experimental approach for seeing through walls
using Wi-Fi enabled software defined radio technology. Elsevier Digit. Commun. Netw 2, 4 (Nov. 2016),
245–255.
A. Droitcour, O. Boric-Lubecke, and G. Kovacs. 2009. Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Doppler Radar System for
Heart and Respiratory Rate Measurements. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 57, 10 (Oct. 2009),
2498–2507.
M. Feng, S. Mao, and T. Jiang. 2015a. Duplex mode selection and channel allocation for full-duplex cognitive
femtocell networks. In Proc. IEEE WCNC 2015. IEEE, New Orleans, LA, 1900–1905.
M. Feng, S. Mao, and T. Jiang. 2015b. Joint duplex mode selection, channel allocation, and power control for
full-duplex cognitive femtocell networks. Elsevier Digit. Commun. Netw 1, 1 (Feb. 2015), 30–44.
J. Gjengset, J. Xiong, G. McPhillips, and K. Jamieson. 2014. Phaser: Enabling phased array signal processing
on commodity WiFi access points. In Proc. ACM Mobicom’14. ACM, Maui, HI, 153–164.
M. X. Gong, R. J. Stacey, D. Akhmetov, and S. Mao. 2010. A directional CSMA/CA protocol for mmWave
wireless PANs. In Proc. IEEE WCNC 2010. Sydney, Australia, 1–6.
D. Halperin., W. J. Hu., A. Sheth., and D. Wetherall. 2010. Predictable 802.11 Packet Delivery from Wireless
Channel Measurements. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM’10. ACM, New Delhi, India, 159–170.
H. Hu, Y.G. Wen, T.-S. Chua, and X.L. Li. 2014. Towards Scalable Systems for Big Data Analytics: A Technology Tutorial. IEEE Access Journal 2 (July 2014), 652–687.
C. Hunt and F. Hauck. 2006. Sudden infant death syndrome. Can. Med. Assoc. J 174, 13 (2006), 1309–1310.
R. Irving. 1985. An efficient algorithm for the ’Stable Roommates’ problem. J. Algorithms 6, 6 (1985), 577–
595.
T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader. 2009. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Rev. 51, 3 (Aug. 2009),
455–500.
M. Kotaru, K. Joshi, D. Bharadia, and S. Katti. 2015. Spotfi: Decimeter level localization using wif. In Proc.
ACM SIGCOMM’15. ACM, London, United Kingdom, 269–282.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
TensorBeat: Tensor Decomposition for Monitoring Multi-Person Breathing Beats with Commodity WiFiA:27
L. De Lathauwer. 2011. Blind separation of exponential polynomials and the decomposition of a tensor in
rank-(Lr, Lr, 1) terms. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl 32, 4 (Dec. 2011), 1451–1474.
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. Nature 521, 7553 (May 2015), 436–444.
J. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, J. Yang, X. Chen, and J. Cheng. 2015. Tracking vital signs during sleep leveraging
off-the-shelf wifi. In Proc. ACM Mobihoc’15. ACM, Hangzhou, China, 267–276.
Y. Luo, D.C. Tao, Y.G. Wen, R. Kotagiri, and C. Xu. 2015. Tensor Canonical Correlation Analysis for Multiview Dimension Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 11 (Nov. 2015),
3111–3124.
M. L. R. Mogue and B. Rantala. 1988. Capnometers. Journal of Clinical Monitoring 4 (Apr. 1988), 115–121.
E. E. Papalexakis, C. Faloutsos, and N. D. Sidiropoulos. 2016. Tensors for Data Mining and Data Fusion:
Models, Applications, and Scalable Algorithms. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 8, 2 (Nov. 2016), 16:1–16:44.
Kun Qian, Chenshu Wu, Zheng Yang, Yunhao Liu, and Zimu Zhou. 2014. PADS: Passive Detection of Moving
Targets with Dynamic Speed using PHY Layer Information. In Proc. IEEE ICPADS’14. IEEE, Hsinchu,
Taiwan, 1–8.
P. Rashidi and D. J. Cook. 2013. COM: A Method for Mining and Monitoring Human Activity Patterns in
Home-based Health Monitoring Systems. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 4, 4
(Sept. 2013), 64:1–64:20.
Y. Ren, C. Wang, J. Yang, and Y. Chen. 2015. Fine-grained Sleep Monitoring: Hearing Your Breathing with
Smartphones. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM’15. IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 1194–1202.
J. Salmi and A. F. Molisch. 2011. Propagation parameter estimation, modeling and measurements for ultrawideband mimo radar. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn. 59, 11 (Nov. 2011), 4257–4267.
S. Salvador and P. Chan. 2004. FastDTW: Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space.
In Proc. KDD Workshop Mining Temporal Sequential Data. ACM, Seattle, WA, 70–80.
S. Salvador and P. Chan. 2007. Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space. Intelligent
Data Analysis Journal 11, 5 (Oct. 2007), 561–580.
C. G. Scully, J. Lee, J. Meyer, A. M. Gorbach, D. Granquist-Fraser, Y. Mendelson, and K. H. Chon. 2010.
Physiological parameter monitoring from optical recordings with a mobile phone. IEEE Trans. Biomed.
Eng. 59, 2 (Feb. 2010), 303–306.
N. H. Shariati and E. Zahedi. 2005. Comparison of selected parametric models for analysis of the photoplethysmographic signal. In Proc. 1st IEEE Conf. Comput., Commun. Signal Process. IEEE, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia, 169–172.
M. Speth, S. Fechtel, G. Fock, and H. Meyr. 1999. Optimum receiver design for wireless broad-band systems
using OFDM–Part I. IEEE Trans. Commun. 47, 11 (Nov. 1999), 1668–1677.
Y. Sun and M. Kumar. 2014. Numerical Solution of High Dimensional Stationary Fokker-Planck Equations
via Tensor Decomposition and Chebyshev Spectral Differentiation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 67, 10 (2014), 1960–1977.
Y. Sun and M. Kumar. 2015. A Numerical Solver for High Dimensional Transient Fokker-Planck Equation
in Modeling Polymeric Fluids. J. Comput. Phys. 289, 10 (2015), 149–168.
D.P. Tao, Y.G. Wen, and R.C. Hong. 2016. Multi-column Bi-directional Long Short-Term Memory for Mobile
Devices-based Human Activity Recognition. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 3, 6 (Dec. 2016), 1124–
1134.
G. Wang, Y. Zou, Z. Zhou, K. wu, and L. Ni. 2014. We can hear you with wi-fi!. In Proc. ACM Mobicom’14.
ACM, Maui, Hawaii, 593–604.
H. Wang, D. Zhang, J. Ma, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Wu, T. Gu, and B. Xie. 2016. Human Respiration Detection
with Commodity WiFi Devices: Do User Location and Body Orientation Matter?. In Proc. Ubicomp’16.
ACM, Heidelberg, Germany, 25–36.
J. Wang and D. Katabi. 2013. Dude, where’s my card?: RFID positioning that works with multipath and
non-line of sight. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM’13. ACM, Hong Kong, China, 51–62.
W. Wang, A. Liu, M. Shahzad, K. Ling, and S. Lu. 2015. Understanding and Modeling of WiFi Signal Based
Human Activity Recognition. In Proc. ACM Mobicom’15. ACM, Paris, France, 65–76.
X. Wang, L. Gao, and S. Mao. 2015. PhaseFi: Phase fingerprinting for indoor localization with a deep learning
approach. In Proc. GLOBECOM’15. IEEE, San Diego, CA, 1–6.
X. Wang, L. Gao, and S. Mao. 2016. CSI phase fingerprinting for indoor localization with a deep learning
approach. IEEE Internet of Things J. 3, 6 (Dec. 2016), 1113–1123.
X. Wang, L. Gao, S. Mao, and S. Pandey. 2015. DeepFi: Deep Learning for Indoor Fingerprinting Using
Channel State Information. In Proc. WCNC’15. IEEE, New Orleans, LA, 1666–1671.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
A:28
X. Wang et al.
X. Wang, L. Gao, S. Mao, and S. Pandey. 2017. CSI-Based Fingerprinting for Indoor Localization: A Deep
Learning Approach. IEEE Trans Veh. Technol. 66, 1 (Jan. 2017), 763–776.
X. Wang, S. Mao, and M.X. Gong. 2016. A survey of LTE Wi-Fi coexistence in unlicensed bands. ACM GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 20, 3 (July 2016), 17–23.
X. Wang, S. Mao, S. Pandey, and P. Agrawal. 2014. CA2T: Cooperative antenna arrays technique for pinpoint
indoor localization. In Proc. MobiSPC 2014. Elsevier, Niagara Falls, Canada, 392–399.
Y. Wang, J. Liu, Y. Chen, M. Gruteser, J. Yang, and H. Liu. 2014. E-eyes: Device-free Location-oriented
Activity Identification Using Fine-grained WiFi Signatures. In Proc. ACM Mobicom’14. ACM, Maui, HI,
617–628.
Chenshu Wu, Zheng Yang, Zimu Zhou, Kun Qian, Yunhao Liu, and Mingyan Liu. 2015. PhaseU: Real-time
LOS Identification with WiFi. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM’15. IEEE, Hong Kong, China, 2038–2046.
Z.L. Wu, C.H. Li, J.K.Y. Ng, and K.R.P.H. Leung. 2007. Location Estimation via Support Vector Regression.
IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput. 6, 3 (Mar. 2007), 311–321.
J. Xiao, Kaishun Wu., Y. Yi, and L.M. Ni. 2012. FIFS: Fine-Grained Indoor Fingerprinting System. In Proc.
IEEE ICCCN’12. ACM, Munich, Germany, 1–7.
Y. Xie, Z. Li, and M. Li. 2015. Precise power delay profiling with commodity wifi. In Proc. ACM Mobicom’15.
ACM, Paris, France, 53–64.
Y. Xu, G. Yue, and S. Mao. 2014. User grouping for Massive MIMO in FDD systems:
New design methods and analysis. IEEE Access Journal 2, 1 (Sept. 2014), 947–959.
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2014.2353297
Z. Yang, P. Pathak, Y. Zeng, X. Liran, and P. Mohapatra. 2016. Monitoring Vital Signs Using Millimeter
Wave. In Proc. IEEE MobiHoc’16. ACM, Paderborn, Germany, 211–220.
Z. Yang, Z. Zhou, and Y. Liu. 2013. From RSSI to CSI: Indoor localization via channel response. Comput.
Surveys 46, 2 (Nov. 2013), 25:1–25:32.
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Vol. V, No. N, Article A, Publication date: January YYYY.
| 5cs.CE
|
SAMPLE-LEVEL CNN ARCHITECTURES FOR MUSIC AUTO-TAGGING
USING RAW WAVEFORMS
Taejun Kim1 , Jongpil Lee2 , Juhan Nam2
arXiv:1710.10451v2 [cs.SD] 14 Feb 2018
1
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Seoul,
2
Graduate School of Culture Technology, KAIST,
[email protected], {richter, juhannam}@kaist.ac.kr
ABSTRACT
Recent work has shown that the end-to-end approach using
convolutional neural network (CNN) is effective in various types of machine learning tasks. For audio signals, the
approach takes raw waveforms as input using an 1-D convolution layer. In this paper, we improve the 1-D CNN architecture for music auto-tagging by adopting building blocks
from state-of-the-art image classification models, ResNets
and SENets, and adding multi-level feature aggregation to it.
We compare different combinations of the modules in building CNN architectures. The results show that they achieve
significant improvements over previous state-of-the-art models on the MagnaTagATune dataset and comparable results on
Million Song Dataset. Furthermore, we analyze and visualize
our model to show how the 1-D CNN operates.
Index Terms— convolutional neural networks, music
auto-tagging, raw waveforms, multi-level learning
1. INTRODUCTION
Time-frequency representations based on short-time Fourier
transform, often scaled in a log-like frequency such as melspectrogram, are the most common choice of input in the
majority of state-of-the-art music classification algorithms
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. The 2-dimentional input represents acoustically meaningful patterns well but requires a set of parameters, such as window size/type and hop size, which may
have different optimal settings depending on the type of input
signals.
In order to overcome the problem, there have been some
efforts to directly use raw waveforms as input particularly for
convolutional neural networks (CNN) based models [6, 7].
While they show promising results, the models used large filters, expecting them to replace the Fourier transform. Recently, Lee et. al. [8] addressed the problem using very small
filters and successfully applied the 1D CNN to the music autotagging task. Inspired from the well-known VGG net that uses
very small size of filters such as 3 × 3, [9], the sample-level
CNN model was configured to take raw waveforms as input
and have filters with such small granularity.
A number of techniques to further improve performances
of CNNs have appeared recently in image domain. He et. al.
introduced ResNets which includes skip connections that enables a very deep CNN to be effectively trained and makes
gradient propagation fluent [10]. Using the skip connections,
they could successfully train a 1001-layer ResNet [11]. Hu
et. al proposed SENets [12] which includes a building block
called Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE). Unlike other recent approaches, the block concentrates on channel-wise information, not spatial. The SE block adaptively recalibrates feature
maps using a channel-wise operation. Most of the techniques
were developed in the field of computer vision but they are not
fully adopted for music classification tasks. Although there
were a few approaches to readily apply them to audio domain
[7, 13]. They used 2D representations as input [13] or used
large filters for the first 1D convolutional layer [7].
On the other hand, some methods are concerned with
overall architecture of the model rather than designing a
fine-grained building block [2, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Specifically,
multi-level feature aggregation combines several hidden layer
representations for final prediction [2, 14]. They significantly
improved the performance in music auto-tagging by taking
different levels of abstractions of tag labels into account.
In this paper, we explore the building blocks of advanced CNN architectures, ResNets and SENets, based on
the sample-level CNN for music auto-tagging. Also, we
observe how the multi-level feature aggregation affects the
performance. The results show that they achieve significant
improvements over previous state-of-the-art models on the
MagnaTagATune dataset and comparable results on Million
Song Dataset. Furthermore, we analyze and visualize our
model built with the SE blocks to show how the 1D CNN operates. The results show that the input signals are processed
in a different manner depending on the level of layers.
2. ARCHITECTURES
All of our models are based on the sample-level 1D CNN
model [8], which is constructed with the basic block shown in
Figure 1(b). Every filter size of the convolution layers is fixed
raw waveform
strided conv
19683 × 128
1D convolutional block ×9
2187× 128
729 × 256
243 × 256
81 × 256
FC ×2
9 × 256
3 × 256
1 × 512
512
global max pooling
global max pooling
27 × 256
multi-level feature aggregation
6551 × 128
256
Conv1D
Conv1D
BatchNorm
BatchNorm
relu
relu
Conv1D
Conv1D
BatchNorm
BatchNorm
59049 × 1
MaxPool
relu
relu
MaxPool
T×C
GlobalAvgPool
1×C
FC
1×αC
relu
Dropout
Dropout
Conv1D
Conv1D
BatchNorm
BatchNorm
T×C
FC
T×C
1×C
GlobalAvgPool
sigmoid
relu
Scale
1×C
FC
MaxPool
T×C
1×αC
relu
FC
T×C
1×C sigmoid
Scale
256
T×C
50
relu
MaxPool
tag prediction
(a) Overview of the architecture
(b) Basic block [8]
(c) SE block
(d) Res-n block
(e) ReSE-n block
Fig. 1. The proposed architecture for music auto-tagging. (a) The models consist of a strided convolutional layer, 9 blocks, and
two fully-connected (FC) layers. The outputs of the last three blocks are concatenated and then used as input of the last two FC
layers. Output dimensions of each block (or layer) are denoted inside of them (temporal×channel). (b-e) The 1D convolutional
building blocks that we evaluate.
to three. The differences between the sample-level CNN and
ours are the use of advanced building blocks and multi-level
feature aggregation. In this section, we describe the details.
2.1. 1D convolutional building blocks
2.1.1. SE block
We utilize the SE block from SENets to increase representational power of the basic block. As shown in Figure 1(c), we
simply attached the SE block to the basic block. The SE block
recalibrates feature maps from the basic block through two
operations. One is squeeze operation that aggregates a global
temporal information into channel-wise statistics using global
average pooling. The operation reduces the temporal dimensionality (T ) to one, averaging outputs from each channel.
The other is excitation operation that adaptively recalibrates
feature maps of each channel using the channel-wise statistics
from the squeeze operation and a simple gating mechanism.
The gating mechanism consists of two fully-connected (FC)
layers that compute nonlinear interactions among channels.
Finally, the original outputs from the basic block are rescaled
by channel-wise multiplication between the feature map and
the sigmoid activation of the second FC layer.
Unlike the original SE block in SENets, our excitation operation does not form a bottleneck. On the contrary, we expand the channel dimensionality (C) to αC at the first FC
layer, and then reduce the dimensionality back to C at the
second layer. We set the amplifying ratio α to be 16, after a
grid search with α = [2−3 , 2−2 , ..., 26 ].
2.1.2. Res-n block
Inspired by skip connections from ResNets, we modified the
basic block by adding a skip connection as shown in Figure
1(d). Res-n denotes that the block uses n convolutional layers
where n is one or two. Specifically, Res-2 is a block that
has the additional layers denoted by the dotted line in Figure
1(d), and Res-1 is a block that has a skip connection only.
When the block uses two convolutional layers (Res-2), we
add a dropout layer (with a drop ratio of 0.2) between two
convolutions to avoid overfitting. This technique was firstly
introduced at WideResNets [18].
2.1.3. ReSE-n block
The ReSE-n block is a combination of the SE and Res-n
blocks as shown in Figure 1(e). n denotes the number of convolutional layers in the block, where n is also one or two. A
dropout layer is inserted when n is two.
2.2. Multi-level feature aggregation
Fig. 1(a) shows the multi-level feature aggregations that we
configured. The outputs of the last three blocks are concate-
Table 1. AUCs of CNN architectures on MTAT. “multi” and
“no multi” indicates if the multi-level feature aggregation is
used or not. † denotes using a weight decay of 10−4 .
MTAT
Block
Basic [8]
SE
Res-1
Res-2
ReSE-1
ReSE-2
multi
no multi
0.9077
0.9111
0.9037
0.9098
0.9053
0.9113†
0.9055
0.9083
0.9048
0.9061
0.9066
0.9102†
nated and then delivered to the FC layers. Before the concatenation, temporal dimensions of the outputs are reduced to
one by a global max pooling. Unlike [2], the concatenation
occurs while training the CNN and the average pooling over
the whole audio clip (i.e. 29 second long), which followed by
the global max pooling, is not included.
3. EXPERIMENTS
3.1. Datasets
We evaluated the proposed architectures on two datasets,
MagnaTagATune (MTAT) dataset [19] and Million Song
Dataset (MSD) annotated with the Last.FM tags [20]. We
split and filtered both of the datasets, following the previous work [5, 6, 8]. We used the 50 most frequent tags. All
songs are trimmed to 29 seconds long, and resampled to
22050Hz as needed. The song is divided into 10 segments of
59049 samples. To evaluate the performance of music autotagging which is a multi-class and multi-label classification
task, we computed the Area Under the Receiver Operating
Characteristic curve (AUC) for each tag and computed the
average across all 50 tags. During the evaluation, we average
predictions across all segments.
3.2. Implementation details
All the networks were trained using SGD with Nesterov momentum of 0.9 and mini-batch size 23. The initial learning
rate is set to 0.01, decayed by a factor of 5 when a validation
loss is on a plateau. None of the regularizations are used on
MSD. A dropout layer of 0.5 was inserted before the last FC
layer on MTAT. For all building blocks, we evaluated either
with or without the multi-level feature aggregation. Since the
training for MSD takes much time longer than MTAT, we explored the architectures mainly on MTAT, and then trained the
two best models on MSD. Code and models built with TensorFlow and Keras are available at the link1 .
1 https://github.com/tae-jun/resemul
Table 2. AUCs of state-of-the-art models on MTAT and
MSD. † denotes that the model used an ensemble of three.
Model
Bag of multi-scaled features [3]
End-to-end [6]
Transfer learning [4]
Persistent CNN [21]
Time-Frequency CNN [22]
Timbre CNN [23]
2D CNN [5]
CRNN [1]
Multi-level & multi-scale [2]
SampleCNN multi-features [14]
SampleCNN [8]
SE [This work]
ReSE [This work]
MTAT
0.8980
0.8815
0.8800
0.9013
0.9007
0.8930
0.8940
0.9017†
0.9064†
0.9055
0.9111
0.9113
MSD
0.8510
0.8620
0.8878†
0.8842
0.8812
0.8840
0.8847
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Comparison of the architectures
Table 1 summarizes the evaluation results of compared CNN
architectures on the MTAT dataset. They show that the SE
block is more effective than the Res-n blocks, increasing the
performance of the basic block for all cases. In the Res-n
block, only adding the skip connection to the basic block
(Res-1) actually decreases the performance. The combination
of the SE and the Res-2 improves it slightly more. However,
a training time of the ReSE-2 is 1.8 times longer than the basic block whereas the SE block only 1.08 times longer. Thus,
if the training or prediction time of the models is important,
the SE model will be preferred to the ReSE-2. The effect
of the multi-level aggregation is valid for the majority of the
models. We obtained two best results in Table 1 by using the
multi-level aggregation.
4.2. Comparison with state-of-the-arts
Table 2 compares previous state-of-the-art models in music
auto-tagging with our best models, the SE block and ReSE2 block, each with multi-level aggregation. On the MTAT
dataset, our best models outperform all the previous results.
On MSD, they are not the best but are comparable to the
second-tier.
5. ANALYSIS OF EXCITATION
To lay the groundwork for understanding how 1D CNNs operate, we analyze the sigmoid activations of excitations in the
SE blocks at different levels graphically and quantitatively. In
this section, we observe how the SE blocks recalibrate channels, depending on which level they exist. The blocks used
for the analysis are from the SE model using the multi-level
Table 3. Co-occurrence matrix of the tags used in Figure 2
1st block
classical
metal
dance
classical
704
0
1
metal
0
166
0
dance
1
0
153
5th (mid) block
std
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
block level
9th (last) block
Fig. 2. Visualization of the sigmoid activations of excitations
in the SE model. The channel index was sorted by the average
of the activations.
feature aggregation and they were trained on MTAT. The activations were extracted from its test set. The activations were
averaged over all segments separately for each tag.
5.1. Graphical analysis
For this analysis, we chose three tags, classical, metal, and
dance that are not similar to each other as shown in Table
3. Figure 2 shows the average sigmoid activations in the SE
blocks for the songs with the three tags. The different levels
of activations indicate that the SE blocks process input audio
differently depending on the tag (or genre) of the music. That
is, every block in Figure 2 fires different patterns of activations for each tag at a specific channel. This trend is strongest
at the first block (top), weakest at the mid block (middle), and
becomes stronger again at the last block (bottom).
This trend is somewhat different from what are observed
in the image domain [12], where the exclusiveness of average
excitation for input with different labels are monotonically
increasing along the layers. Specifically, the first block fires
high activations for classical, low ones for dance, and even
lower ones for metal for the majority of the channels. On the
other hand, the activations of the last block vary depending
on the tags. For example, the activations of metal are high at
some channels but low at the others, which makes the activations noisy even though they are sorted. We can interpret this
result as follows. The first block normalizes the loudness of
the audios because the block fires high activations for classical music, which tend to have small volume, and low activa-
Fig. 3. Standard deviations (std) of the activations of excitations across all tags along each layer.
tions for metal music, which tend to have large volume. Also,
the middle block processes common features among them as
they have similar levels of activations. Finally, the noisy exclusiveness in the last block indicates that they effectively discriminate the music with different tags.
5.2. Quantitative analysis
We assure the exclusiveness trend by measuring standard deviations of the activations across all tags at every level. Figure
3 shows that the higher the standard deviation is, the more the
block responses to the song differently according to its tag.
The result shows that the standard deviation is highest at the
first block, it drops and stays low up to the 5th block and then
increases gradually until the last block. That is, the four lower
blocks except the the bottom one (2 to 5) tend to handle general features whereas the four upper blocks (6 to 9) tend to
progressively more discriminative features.
6. CONCLUSION
We proposed 1D convolutional building blocks based on the
previous work, the sample-level CNN, ResNets, and SENets.
The ReSE block, which is a combination of the three models, showed the best performance. Also, the multi-level feature aggregation showed improvements on the majority of the
building blocks. Through the experiments, we obtained stateof-the-art performance on the MTAT dataset and high-ranked
results on MSD. In addition, we analyzed the activations of
excitation in SE model to understand the effect. With this
analysis, we could observe that the SE blocks process nonsimilar songs exclusively and how the different levels of the
model process the songs in a different manner.
7. REFERENCES
[1] Keunwoo Choi, György Fazekas, Mark Sandler, and
Kyunghyun Cho, “Convolutional recurrent neural networks for music classification,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2017,
pp. 2392–2396.
[2] Jongpil Lee and Juhan Nam, “Multi-level and multiscale feature aggregation using pretrained convolutional
neural networks for music auto-tagging,” IEEE Signal
Processing Letters, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1208–1212, 2017.
[3] Sander Dieleman and Benjamin Schrauwen, “Multiscale approaches to music audio feature learning,” in International Society of Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 2013, pp. 116–121.
[4] Aäron Van Den Oord, Sander Dieleman, and Benjamin Schrauwen, “Transfer learning by supervised pretraining for audio-based music classification,” in International Society of Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 2014.
[5] Keunwoo Choi, György Fazekas, and Mark B. Sandler,
“Automatic tagging using deep convolutional neural networks,” in International Society of Music Information
Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 2016.
[6] Sander Dieleman and Benjamin Schrauwen, “End-toend learning for music audio,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2014,
pp. 6964–6968.
[7] Wei Dai, Chia Dai, Shuhui Qu, Juncheng Li, and Samarjit Das, “Very deep convolutional neural networks for
raw waveforms,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2017, pp. 421–425.
[8] Jongpil Lee, Jiyoung Park, Keunhyoung Luke Kim, and
Juhan Nam, “Sample-level deep convolutional neural networks for music auto-tagging using raw waveforms,” in Sound and Music Computing Conference
(SMC), 2017.
[9] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman, “Very deep
convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition,” ICLR, 2015.
[10] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian
Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,”
in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2016, pp. 770–778.
[11] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian
Sun, “Identity mappings in deep residual networks,”
in European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV).
Springer, 2016, pp. 630–645.
[12] Jie Hu, Li Shen, and Gang Sun,
“Squeeze-andexcitation networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01507,
2017.
[13] Shawn Hershey, Sourish Chaudhuri, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Jort F. Gemmeke, Aren Jansen, R. Channing Moore,
Manoj Plakal, Devin Platt, Rif A. Saurous, Bryan Seybold, Malcolm Slaney, Ron J. Weiss, and Kevin W. Wilson, “Cnn architectures for large-scale audio classification,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2017, pp. 131–135.
[14] Jongpil Lee and Juhan Nam, “Multi-level and multiscale feature aggregation using sample-level deep convolutional neural networks for music classification,”
Machine Learning for Music Discovery Workshop, International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML),
2017.
[15] Yi Sun, Xiaogang Wang, and Xiaoou Tang, “Deep learning face representation from predicting 10,000 classes,”
in IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 2014, pp. 1891–1898.
[16] Jeff Donahue, Yangqing Jia, Oriol Vinyals, Judy Hoffman, Ning Zhang, Eric Tzeng, and Trevor Darrell, “Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic
visual recognition,” in International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2014, pp. 647–655.
[17] Yusuf Aytar, Carl Vondrick, and Antonio Torralba,
“Soundnet: Learning sound representations from unlabeled video,” in Neural Information Processing Systems
(NIPS), 2016, pp. 892–900.
[18] Sergey Zagoruyko and Nikos Komodakis, “Wide residual networks,” British Machine Vision Conference
(BMVC), 2016.
[19] Edith Law, Kris West, Michael I. Mandel, Mert Bay,
and J. Stephen Downie, “Evaluation of algorithms using games: The case of music tagging,” in International
Society of Music Information Retrieval Conference (ISMIR), 2009.
[20] Thierry Bertin-Mahieux, Daniel P. W. Ellis, Brian Whitman, and Paul Lamere, “The million song dataset,”
in International Society of Music Information Retrieval
Conference (ISMIR), 2011, vol. 2, p. 10.
[21] Jen-Yu Liu, Shyh-Kang Jeng, and Yi-Hsuan Yang, “Applying topological persistence in convolutional neural network for music audio signals,” arXiv preprint
arXiv:1608.07373, 2016.
[22] Umut Güçlü, Jordy Thielen, Michael Hanke, Marcel van
Gerven, and Marcel AJ van Gerven, “Brains on beats,”
in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2016,
pp. 2101–2109.
[23] Jordi Pons, Olga Slizovskaia, Rong Gong, Emilia
Gómez, and Xavier Serra, “Timbre analysis of music audio signals with convolutional neural networks,” arXiv
preprint arXiv:1703.06697, 2017.
| 9cs.NE
|
On the linear quadratic problem for systems with time reversed
Markov jump parameters and the duality with filtering of Markov
jump linear systems
arXiv:1611.07558v1 [cs.SY] 22 Nov 2016
Daniel Gutierrez and Eduardo F. Costa
Abstract— We study a class of systems whose parameters
are driven by a Markov chain in reverse time. A recursive
characterization for the second moment matrix, a spectral
radius test for mean square stability and the formulas for
optimal control are given. Our results are determining for the
question: is it possible to extend the classical duality between
filtering and control of linear systems (whose matrices are
transposed in the dual problem) by simply adding the jump
variable of a Markov jump linear system. The answer is positive
provided the jump process is reversed in time.
I. I NTRODUCTION
In this note we study a class of systems whose parameters
are driven by a time reversed Markov chain. Given a time
horizon ℓ and a standard Markov chain {η(t), t = 0, 1, . . .}
taking values in the set {1, 2, . . . , N }, we consider the
process
θ(t) = η(ℓ − t), 0 ≤ t ≤ ℓ,
(1)
and the system
(
x(t + 1) = Aθ(t) x(t) + Bθ(t) u(t),
Φ:
x(0)
= x0 , 0 ≤ t ≤ ℓ − 1,
(2)
where, as usual, x represents the state variable of the system
and u is the control variable. These systems may be encountered in real world problems, specially when a Markov chain
interacts with the system parameters via a first in last out
queue. An example consists of drilling sedimentary rocks
whose layers can be modelled by a Markov chain from
bottom to top as a consequence of their formation process.
The first drilled layer is the last formed one. Another example
is a DC-motor whose brush is grind by a machine subject to
failures, leaving a series of imprecisions on the brush width
that can be described by a Markov chain, so that the last
failure will be the first to affect the motor collector depending
on how the brush is installed.
One of the most remarkable features of system Φ is
that it provides a dual for optimal filtering of standard
Markov jump linear systems (MJLS). In fact, if we consider
a quadratic cost functional for system Φ with linear state
feedback, leading to an optimal control problem [4] that we
call time reversed Markov jump linear quadratic problem
(TRM-JLQP), then we show that the solution is identical
to the gains of the linear minimum mean square estimator
This work was supported by FAPESP, CNPQ and Capes. Authors
are with the Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e de Computação,
Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil [email protected],
[email protected]
(LMMSE) formulated in [8], [9], with time-reversed gains
and transposed matrices. In perspective with existing duality
relations, the one obtained here is a direct generalization
of the well known relation between control and filtering
of linear time varying systems as presented for instance
in [10, Table 6.1], or also in [3], [16], [17] in different
contexts. As for MJLS, the duality between control and
filtering have been considered e.g. in [2], [5], [7], [8], [12],
[13], [15], while purely in the context of standard MJLS,
thus leading to more complex relations involving certain
generalized coupled Riccati difference equations. Here, the
duality follows naturally from the simple reversion of the
Markov chain given in (1), with no extra assumptions nor
complex constructions.
Another interesting feature of Φ is that the variable
E{x(t)x(t)′ · 1{θ(t)=i} }, which is commonly used in the
literature of MJLS, [1], [8], [11], [14], evolves along time
t according to a time-varying linear operator, as shown in
Remark 1, in a marked dissimilarity with standard MJLS.
This motivated us to employ X(k), the conditioned second
moment of x(k), leading to time-homogeneous operators.
The contents of this note are as follows. We present basic
notation in Section II. In Section III we give the recursive
equation describing X, which leads to a stability condition
involving the spectral radius of a time-homogeneous linear
operator. In Section IV, we formulate and solve the TRMJLQ problem, following a proof method where we decompose X into two components as to handle θ that are visited
with zero probability. The duality with the LMMSE then
follows in a straightforward manner, as presented in Section
V. Concluding remarks are given in Section VI.
II. N OTATION AND
THE SYSTEM SETUP
Let ℜn be the n-dimensional euclidean space and ℜm,n
be the space formed by real matrices of dimension m by
n. We write C m,n to represent the Hilbert space composed
of N real matrices, that is Y = (Y1 , . . . , YN ) ∈ C m,n ,
where Yi ∈ ℜm,n , i = 1, . . . , N . The
C n,m equipped
Pspace
N
′
with the inner product hY, Zi =
Tr(Y
i Zi ), where
i=1
Tr(·) is the trace operator and the superscript ′ denotes the
transpose, is a Hilbert space. The inner product induces the
norm kY k = hY, Y i1/2 . If n = m, we write simply C n .
The mathematical operations involving elements of C n,m ,
are used in element-wise fashion, e.g. for Y and Z in C n we
have Y Z = (Y1 Z1 , . . . , YN ZN ), where Yi Zi is the usual
matrix multiplication. Similarly, for a set of scalars α =
(α1 , . . . , αN ) ∈ C 1 we write αY = (α1 Y1 , . . . , αN YN ).
Regarding the system setup, it is assumed throughout
the paper that x0 ∈ ℜn is a random variable with zero
mean satisfying E{x0 x′0 } = ∆. We have x(t) ∈ ℜn and
u(t) ∈ ℜm . The system matrices belong to given sets
A, E ∈ C n , B ∈ C n,m , C ∈ C s,n and D ∈ C s,m with
Ci′ Di = 0 and Di′ Di > 0 for each i = 1, . . . , N . We write
πi (t) = Pr(θ(t) = i), where Pr(·) is the probability measure;
π(t) is considered as an element of C 1 , that is, π(t) =
(π1 (t), . . . , πN (t)). πi stands for the limiting distribution
of the Markov chain η when it exists, in such a manner
that πi = limℓ→∞ πi (0). Also, we denote by P = [pij ],
i, j = 1, . . . , N the transition probability matrix of the
Markov chain η, so that for any t = 1, . . . , ℓ,
Pr(θ(t − 1) = j | θ(t) = i) =
= Pr(η(ℓ − t + 1) = j | η(ℓ − t) = i) = pij .
UZ,i (Y ) =
VZ,i (Y ) =
Di (Y ) =
pij Zj Yj Zj′
j=1
Zi′ Di (Y
N
X
)Zi ,
(3)
pji Yj .
OF SYSTEM
Φ
Let E{·} be the expected value of a random variable. We
consider the conditioned second moment of x(t) defined by
Xi (t) = E{x(t)x(t)′ | θ(t) = i},
t = 0, 1, . . . .
(4)
Lemma 3.1: Consider the system Φ with u(t) = 0 for
each t. The conditioned second moment X(t) ∈ C n is given
by X(0) = (∆, . . . , ∆) and
X(t + 1) = UA (X(t)), t = 0, 1, . . . ℓ − 1.
(5)
Proof: For a fixed, arbitrary i ∈ {0, . . . , N }, note that
Xi (0) =
E{x0 x′0
| θ(0) = i} =
E{x0 x′0 }
= ∆.
From (2), (4) and the total probability law we obtain:
Xi (t + 1) = E{Aθ(t) x(t)x(t)′ A′θ(t) | θ(t + 1) = i}
=
N
X
′
E{Aθ(t) x(t)x(t)
A′θ(t)
= E{Γ(η(ℓ), . . . , η(ℓ − t))|η(ℓ − t) = j, η(ℓ − t − 1) = i}
· Prob(η(ℓ − t) = j | η(ℓ − t − 1) = i}
= E{Γ(η(ℓ), . . . , η(ℓ − t))|η(ℓ − t) = j}pij
= E{Γ(θ(0), . . . , θ(t)) | θ(t) = j}pij ,
then by replacing Γ with Aθ (t)x(t)x(t)′ A′θ(t) and applying
the above in (6) yields
Xi (t + 1) =
· 1θ(t)=j | θ(t + 1) = i}.
N
X
pij Aj Xj (t)A′j = UA,i (X(t)),
j=1
which completes the proof.
Remark 1: Let W (t) ∈ C n , t = 0, . . . , ℓ be given by
Wi (t + 1) =
N
X
pij
j=1
πi (t + 1)
Aj Wj (t)A′j .
πj (t)
j=1
In order to compute the right hand side of (6), we need the
following standard Markov chain property: for any function
(8)
Note that the Markov chain measure appears explicitly,
leading to a time-varying mapping from W (t) to W (t + 1).
The only exception is when the Markov chain is reversible, in
which case the facts that πj pji = πi pij and that the Markov
chain starts with the invariant measure (by definition) yield
πi (t + 1)
πi
= pji ,
= pij
πj (t)
πj
in which case W evolves exactly as in a standard MJLS.
The following notion is adapted from [8, Chapter 3].
Definition 3.1: We say that the system Φ with u(t) = 0
is mean square stable (MS-stable), whenever
lim E kx(ℓ)k2 = 0.
ℓ→∞
This is equivalent to say that the variable X(ℓ) converges to
zero as ℓ goes to infinity, leading to the following result.
Theorem 3.1: The system Φ with u(t) = 0 is MS-stable
if and only if the spectral radius of UA is smaller than one.
IV. T HE TRM-JLQ
PROBLEM
Let the output variable y given by y(ℓ) = Eθ(ℓ) x(ℓ) and
y(t) = Cθ(t) x(t) + Dθ(t) u(t),
t = 0, . . . , ℓ − 1.
The TRM-JLQ consists of minimizing the mean square of y
with ℓ stages, as usual in jump linear quadratic problems,
)
( ℓ
X
2
(9)
min
E
ky(t)k .
u(0),...,u(ℓ−1)
(6)
(7)
This variable is commonly encountered in the majority of
papers dealing with (standard) MJLS. However, calculations
similar to that in Lemma 3.1 lead to
pij
j=1
III. P ROPERTIES
E{Γ(θ(0), . . . , θ(t)) · 1θ(t)=j | θ(t + 1) = i}
= E{Γ(η(ℓ), . . . , η(ℓ − t)) · 1η(ℓ−t)=j | η(ℓ − t − 1) = i}
Wi (t) = E{x(t)x(t)′ · 1θ(t)=i }.
No additional assumption is made on the Markov chain,
yielding a rather general setup that includes periodic chains,
important for the duality relation given in Remark 2. We
shall deal with linear operators UZ , VZ , D : C n → C n . We
write the i-th element of UZ (Y ) by UZ,i (Y ) and similarly
for the other operators. For each i = 1, . . . , N , we define:
N
X
Γ : θ(0), . . . , θ(t) → ℜn,n we have
t=0
Regarding the information structure of the problem, we
assume that θ(t) is available to the controller, that the control
is in linear state feedback form,
u(t) = Kθ(t) (t)x(t),
t = 0, 1, . . . ℓ − 1,
(10)
where K(t) ∈ C m,n is the decision variable, and that one
should be able to compute the sequence K(0), . . . , K(ℓ − 1)
prior to the system operation, that is, K(t) is not a function
of the observations (x(s), θ(s)), 0 ≤ s ≤ ℓ. The conditioned
second moment X for the closed loop system is of much
help in obtaining the solution. The recursive formula for X
follows by a direct adaptation of Lemma 3.1, by replacing
A ∈ C n with its closed loop version
Ai (t) = Ai + Bi Ki (t).
(11)
Then,
V t (X) = hP (t), Xi
(19)
op
and K (t) = M (t), t = 0, . . . , ℓ.
Proof: We apply the dynamic programming approach
for the costs defined in (16) and the system in (12), whose
state is the variable X := X(t). It can be checked that U is
the adjoint operator of V, and consequently
V t (X) = min hπ(t)Q(t), Xi + hP (t + 1), UA(t) (X)i,
K(t)
= min hπ(t)Q(t) + A(t)′ D(P (t + 1))A(t), Xi.
(20)
K(t)
Lemma 4.1: The conditioned second moment X(t) ∈ C
is given by X(0) = (∆, . . . , ∆) and
X(t + 1) = UA(t) (X(t)), t = 0, 1, . . . , ℓ − 1.
In what follows, for brevity we denote
Q(ℓ) = π(ℓ)E ′ E,
Q(t) = C ′ C + K(t)′ D′ DK(t),
n
N
t = 0, . . . , ℓ − 1.
t=0
Proof: The mean square of the terminal cost, y(ℓ) is:
E{ky(ℓ)k2 } =
N
X
′
E{x(ℓ)′ Eθ(ℓ)
Eθ(ℓ) x(ℓ) · 1θ(ℓ)=i }
i=1
=
N
X
(14)
i=1
Now, by a calculation similar as above leads to
′
′
Substituting (14) and (15) into (9) we obtain (13).
Let us denote the gains attaining (13) by K op (t). From
a dynamic programming standpoint, we introduce value
functions V t : C n → ℜ by: V ℓ = hπ(ℓ)Q(ℓ), X(ℓ)i and
for t = ℓ − 1, ℓ − 2, . . . , 0,
( ℓ
)
X
t
(16)
hπ(τ )Q(τ ), X(τ )i ,
V (X) =
min
τ =t
where X(t) = X and X(τ ), τ = t + 1, . . . , ℓ, satisfies (12).
Theorem 4.1: Define P (t) ∈ C n and M (t) ∈ C m,n , t =
0, . . . , ℓ − 1, as follows. Let P (ℓ) = π(ℓ)E ′ E and for each
t = ℓ − 1, . . . , 0 and i = 1, . . . , N , compute: if πi (t) = 0,
Mi (t) = 0 and Pi (t) = 0,
Ri (t) = (Bi′ Di (P (t + 1))Bi + πi (t)Di′ Di ),
Pi (t)
= πi (t)Ci′ Ci + A′i Di (P (t + 1))Ai
− A′i Di (P (t + 1))Bi Ri (t)−1 Bi′ Di (P (t
is zero irrespectively of K(t). First, note that for i ∈ Nt
we have πi (t)Qi (t)XN
i = 0. Second, for i ∈ Nt one can
check that πj (t + 1) = 0 for all j such that pji > 0, so that
Pj (t + 1) = 0. This yields Di (P (t + 1)) = 0. Bringing these
facts together and recalling that by construction XN
i = 0 for
all i ∈
/ Nt , we evaluate
(21)
By substituting (21) into (20) we write
V t (X) = min hπ(t)Q(t) + A(t)′ D(P (t + 1))A(t), XP i.
K(t)
X
Tr (πi (t)Qi (t)
= min
{i∈N
/ t}
+ Ai (t)′ Di (P (t + 1))Ai (t))XPi .
(22)
By expanding some terms and after some algebra to complete
the squares, we have
X
Tr (πi (t)Ci′ Ci + A′i Di (P (t + 1))Ai
V t (X) = min
K(t)
{i∈N
/ t}
+(Ki (t) − Oi (t))′ (Bi′ Di (P (t + 1))Bi + πi (t)Di′ Di )
·(Ki (t) − Oi (t)) − Oi (t)′ (Bi′ Di (P (t + 1))Bi
+ πi (t)Di′ Di )Oi (t))XP
i ,
(23)
where Oi (t) = Mi (t) as given in (17). This makes clear that
the minimal cost is achieved by setting Kiop (t) = Mi (t),
op
i∈
/ Nt . Now, by replacing Ki (t) with Ki (t) in (23),
X
Tr Pi (t)XP
V t (X) =
i
{i∈N
/ t}
else (if πi (t) > 0),
Mi (t) = Ri (t)−1 Bi′ Di (P (t + 1))Ai ,
hπ(t)Q(t) + A(t)′ D(P (t + 1))A(t), XN i
K(t)
′
E{ky(t)k } = hπ(t)(C C + K(t) D DK(t)), X(t)i. (15)
K(t),...,K(ℓ−1)
We write X = X + XP , where XN is such that XN
i = 0 for
any i ∈
/ Nt , and in a similar fashion XPi = 0 for i ∈ Nt . We
now show that the term
hπ(t)Q(t) + A(t)′ D(P (t + 1))A(t), XN i = 0.
Tr(πi (ℓ)Ei′ Ei Xi (ℓ) = hπ(ℓ)E ′ E, X(ℓ)i.
2
Nt = {i : πi (t) = 0}.
(12)
Lemma 4.2: The TRM-JLQ problem can be formulated as
( ℓ
)
X
(13)
min
hπ(t)Q(t), X(t)i .
K(0),...,K(ℓ−1)
Let us decompose X as follows; let the set of states θ having
zero probability of being visited at time t be denoted by
(17)
with Pi (t) as given in (18), i ∈
/ Nt . Finally, by choosing
Pi (t) = 0, i ∈ Nt , we write
X
X
Tr Pi (t)XN
+
Tr Pi (t)XP
V t (X) =
i ,
i
{i∈N
/ t}
+ 1))Ai .
(18)
P
{i∈Nt }
N
= hP (t), X i + hP (t), X i = hP (t), Xi,
which completes the proof.
V. T HE DUALITY BETWEEN THE TRM-JLQ
LMMSE FOR STANDARD MJLS
AND THE
We consider the LMMSE for standard MJLS as presented
in [6], [9]. The problem consists of finding the sequence
of sets of gains K f (t), t = 0, . . . , ℓ, that minimizes the
covariance of the estimation error z̃(t) = ẑ(t) − z(t) when
the estimate is given by a Luenberger observer in the form
f
ẑ(t + 1) = Aη(t+1) ẑ(t) + Kη(t+1)
(t)(y(t) − Lη(t) ẑ(t)),
where y(t) is the output of the MJLS
z(t + 1) = Fη(t+1) z(t) + Gη(t+1) ω(t)
y(t)
= Lη(t+1) z(t) + Hη(t+1) ω(t)
z(0)
= z0 ,
(24)
and ω(t) and z0 are i.i.d. random variables satisfying
E{ω(t)} = 0, E{ω(t)ω(t)′ } = I and E{z0 z0′ } = Σ.
Moreover, it is assumed that Li Hi′ = 0 and Hi Hi′ > 0.
We write υi (t) = Prob(η(t) = i), i = 1, . . . , N , so
that it is the time-reverse of π, υ(t) = π(ℓ − t). Note
that we are considering the same problem as in [6], [9],
though our notation is slightly different: here we assume that
(y(t), η(t + 1)) is available for the filter to obtain ẑ(t + 1)
and the system matrices are indexed by η(t+1), while in the
standard formulation (y(t), η(t)) are observed at time t and
the system matrices are indexed by η(t). This “time shifting”
in η avoids a cluttering in the duality relation. Along the
same line, instead of writing the filter gains as a function of
the variable Yi (t) = E{z̃(t)z̃(t)′ · 1{η(t+1)=i} }, given by the
coupled Riccati difference equation [9, Equation 24]
Yi (t + 1) =
N
X
j=1
pji Fj Yj (t)Fj′ + υj (t)Gj G′j − Fj Yj (t)L′j
· Lj Yj (t)L′j + υj (t)Hj Hj′
−1
Lj Yj (t)Fj′
whenever υi (t) > 0 and Yi (t + 1) = 0 otherwise, in this
note we use the variable Si (t) = E{z̃(t)z̃(t)′ · 1{η(t)=i} }
defined in [7], leading to Y (t) = D(S(t)). Replacing this in
the above equation, after some algebraic manipulation one
obtains [7, Equation 8]:
Si (t + 1) = υi (t)Gi G′i + Fi Di (S(t))Fi′ − Fi Di (S(t))L′i
· (Li Fi (S(t))L′i + υi (t)Hi Hi′ )−1 Li Di (S(t))Fi′ ,
(25)
whenever υi (t) > 0 and Si (t + 1) = 0 otherwise, with initial
condition Si (0) = E{z̃(0)z̃(0)′ · 1{η(0)=i} } = υi (0)Σ. The
optimal gains are given for t = 0, . . . , ℓ by
−1
Kif (t) = Fi Di (S(t))L′i (Li Di (S(t))L′i + υi (t)Hi Hi′ )
(26)
whenever υi (t) > 0 and Kif (t) = 0 otherwise. The duality
relations between the filtering and control problems are
now evident by direct comparison between (18) and (25).
Fi , Li , Gi and Hi are replaced with A′i , Bi′ , Ci′ and Di′ ,
respectively. Moreover, comparing the initial conditions of
the coupled Riccati difference equations, we see Σ replaced
with E ′ E. Also, we note that P (0), P (1), . . . , P (ℓ) are
equivalent to S(ℓ), S(ℓ−1), . . . , S(0), with a similar relation
op
for the gains Kif and Ki . The Markov chains driving the
filtering and control systems are time-reversed one to each
other.
Remark 2: Time-varying parameters can be included both
in standard MJLS and in Φ by augmenting the Markov state
as to describe the pair (θ, t), 1 ≤ θ ≤ N , 0 ≤ t ≤ ℓ,
and considering a suitable matrix P of higher dimension
N × (ℓ + 1). Although this reasoning leads to a matrix P
of high dimension, periodic and sparse, it is useful to make
clear that our results are readily adaptable to plants whose
matrices are in the form Aθ(t) (t). Either by this reasoning
or by re-doing all computations given in this note for timevarying plants, we obtain the following generalization of [10,
Table 6.1].
FILTERING of MJLS
CONTROL of Φ
Fi (t)
Li (t)
Gi (t)
Hi (t)
A′i (t)
Bi′ (t)
Ci′ (t)
Di′ (t)
Kif (t)
Si (0) = υi (0)Σ
Si (t)
ηi (t)
Ki (ℓ − t)
Pi (ℓ) = πi (ℓ)Ei′ Ei
Pi (ℓ − t)
θi (ℓ − t)
op ′
TABLE I
S UMMARY OF THE F ILTERING /C ONTROL D UALITY. t = 0, . . . , ℓ.
VI. C ONCLUDING REMARKS
We have presented an operator theory characterization of
the conditional second moment X, an MS stability test and
formulas for the optimal control of system Φ. The results
have exposed some interesting relations with standard MJLS.
For system Φ it is fruitful to use the true conditional second
moment X whereas for standard MJLS one has to resort to
the variable W given in (7) to obtain a recursive equation
similar to the ones expressed in the Lemmas 3.1 and 4.1.
Moreover, these classes of systems are equivalent if and only
if the Markov chain is revertible, as indicated in Remark 1.
The solution of the TRM-JLQ problem is given in Theorem
4.1 in the form of a coupled Riccati equation that can be
computed backwards prior to the system operation, as usual
in linear quadratic problems for linear systems. The result
beautifully extends the classic duality between filtering and
control into the relations expressed in Table 1.
R EFERENCES
[1] E. F. Costa A. N. Vargas and J. B. R. do Val. On the control of
Markov jump linear systems with no mode observation: application
to a dc motor device. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear
Control, 2011.
[2] H. Abou-Kandil, G. Freiling, and G. Jank. On the solution of discretetime Markovian jump linear quadratic control problems. Automatica,
31:765–768, 1995.
[3] Panos J. Antsaklis and Anthony N. Michel.
Linear Systems.
Birkhauser, 2006.
[4] T. Basar. The Riccati Equation: Generalized Riccati Equation in
Dynamic Games, chapter 11, pages 293–333. Springer-Verlag Berlin
Heidelberg, 1991.
[5] S. Bittanti, A. J. Laub, and J. C. Willems. The Riccati Equation.
Springer Verlag, 1991.
[6] O. L. V. Costa. Linear minimum mean square error estimation for
discrete-time Markovian jump linear systems. IEEE Transactions on
Automatic Control, 39(8):1685–1689, 1994.
[7] O. L. V. Costa. Discrete-time coupled Riccati equations for systems
with Markov switching parameters. Journal of Mathematical Analysis
and Applications, 194:197–216, 1995.
[8] O. L. V. Costa, M. D. Fragoso, and R. P. Marques. Discrete-Time
Markovian Jump Linear Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2005.
[9] O. L. V. Costa and E. F. Tuesta. Finite horizon quadratic optimal
control and a separation principle for Markovian jump linear systems.
IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 48, 2003.
[10] M. H. Davis and R. B. Vinter. Stochastic Modelling and Control.
Chapman and Hall, 1984.
[11] J. do Val and T. Basar. Receding horizon control of jump linear
systems and a macroeconomic policy problem. Journal of Economic
Dynamics & Control, 23:1099–1131, 1999.
[12] V. Dragan and T. Morozan. Discrete-time Riccati type equations and
the tracking problem. ICIC Express Letters, 2(2):109–116, 2008.
[13] V. Dragan, T. Morozan, and A. M. Stoica. Mathematical methods
in robust control of discrete-time linear stochastic systems. Springer,
2009.
[14] J. B. R. do Val E. F. Costa, A. N. Vargas. Quadratic costs and
second moments of jump linear systems with general Markov chain.
Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications, 2012.
[15] V. Ionescu H. Abou-Kandil, G. Freiling and G. Jank. Matrix Riccati
Equations in Control Systems Theory. Birkhauser, Basel, 2003.
[16] R. E. Kalman and Bucy R. S. New results in linear filtering and
prediction theory. Journal of Basic Engineering, 83(1), 1963.
[17] X. Song and X. Yan. Duality of linear estimation for multiplicative
noise systems with measurement delay. IET Signal Processing, 2013.
| 3cs.SY
|
Offline and Online Models of Budget Allocation for
Maximizing Influence Spread
arXiv:1508.01059v3 [cs.DS] 12 Mar 2018
Noa Avigdor-Elgrabli∗
Gideon Blocq†
Iftah Gamzu‡
Ariel Orda§
Abstract
The research of influence propagation in social networks via word-of-mouth processes has been given
considerable attention in recent years. Arguably, the most fundamental problem in this domain is the
influence maximization problem, where the goal is to identify a small seed set of individuals that can
trigger a large cascade of influence in the network. While there has been significant progress regarding this
problem and its variants, one basic shortcoming of the underlying models is that they lack the flexibility in
the way the overall budget is allocated to different individuals. Indeed, budget allocation is a critical issue
in advertising and viral marketing. Taking the other point of view, known models allowing flexible budget
allocation do not take into account the influence spread in social networks. We introduce a generalized
model that captures both budgets and influence propagation simultaneously.
For the offline setting, we identify a large family of natural budget-based propagation functions that
admits a tight approximation guarantee. This family extends most of the previously studied influence
models, including the well-known Triggering model. We establish that any function in this family implies
an instance of a monotone submodular function maximization over the integer lattice subject to a knapsack
constraint. This problem is known to admit an optimal 1 − 1/e ≈ 0.632-approximation. We also study the
price of anarchy of the multi-player game that extends the model and establish tight results.
For the online setting, in which an unknown subset of agents arrive in a random order and the algorithm
needs to make an irrevocable budget allocation in each step, we develop a 1/(15e) ≈ 0.025-competitive
algorithm. This setting extends the celebrated secretary problem, and its variant, the submodular knapsack
secretary problem. Notably, our algorithm improves over the best known approximation for the latter
problem, even though it applies to a more general setting.
∗
Yahoo Labs, Haifa, Israel. Email: [email protected].
Technion, Haifa, Israel. Email: [email protected]. This work was done when the author was an intern at
Yahoo Labs, Haifa, Israel.
‡
Amazon, Israel. Email: [email protected]. This work was done when the author was affiliated with Yahoo Labs,
Haifa, Israel.
§
Technion, Haifa, Israel. Email: [email protected].
†
1 Introduction
The study of information and influence propagation in societies has received increasing attention for several
decades in various areas of research. Recently, the emergence of online social networks brought forward
many new questions and challenges regarding the dynamics by which information, ideas, and influence spread
among individuals. One central algorithmic problem in this domain is the influence maximization problem,
where the goal is to identify a small seed set of individuals that can trigger a large word-of-mouth cascade of
influence in the network. This problem has been posed by Domingos and Richardson [13, 36] in the context
of viral marketing. The premise of viral marketing is that by targeting a few influential individuals as initial
adopters of a new product, it is possible to trigger a cascade of influence in a social network. Specifically,
those individuals are assumed to recommend the product to their friends, who in turn recommend it to their
friends, and so on.
The influence maximization problem was formally defined by Kempe, Kleinberg and Tardos [26, 27].
In this setting, we are given a social network graph, which represents the individuals and the relationships
between them. We are also given an influence function that captures the expected number of individuals that
become influenced for any given subset of initial adopters. Given some budget b, the objective is to find a
seed set of b initial adopters that will maximize the expected number of influenced individuals. Kempe et
al. studied several operational models representing the step-by-step dynamics of propagation in the network,
and analyzed the influence functions that are derived from them. While there has been significant progress
regarding those models and related algorithmic issues, one shortcoming that essentially has not been treated
is the lack of flexibility in the way that the budget is allocated to the individuals. Indeed, budget allocation is
a critical factor in advertising and viral marketing. This raises some concerns regarding the applicability of
current techniques.
Consider the following scenario as a motivating example. A new daily deals website is interested in
increasing its exposure to new audience. Consequently, it decides to provide discounts to individuals who are
willing to announce their purchases in a social network. The company has several different levels of discounts
that it can provide to individuals to incentivize them to better communicate their purchases, e.g., making
more enthusiastic announcements on their social network. The company hopes that those announcements
will motivate the friends of the targeted individuals to visit the website, so a word-of-mouth process will
be created. The key algorithmic question for this company is whom should they offer a discount, and what
amount of discounts should be offered to each individual.
Alon et al. [1] have recently identified the insufficiency of existing models to deal with budgets. They
introduced several new models that capture issues related to budget distribution among potential influencers
in a social network. One main caveat in their models is that they do not take into account the influence
propagation that happens in the network. The main aspect of our work targets this issue.
1.1
Our results
We introduce a generalized model that captures both budgets and influence propagation simultaneously. Our
model combines design decisions taken from both the budget models [1] and propagation models [26]. The
model interprets the budgeted influence propagation as a two-stage process consisting of: (1) influence related
directly to the budget allocation, in which the seed set of targeted individuals influence their friends based on
their budget, and (2) influence resulting from a secondary word-of-mouth process in the network, in which
no budgets are involved. Note that the two stages give rise to two influence functions whose combination
designates the overall influence function of the model. We study our model in both offline and online settings.
An offline setting. We identify a large family of natural budget-based propagation functions that admits a
tight approximation guarantee. Specifically, we establish sufficient properties for the two influence functions
1
mentioned above, which lead to a resulting influence function that is both monotone and submodular. It is important to emphasize that the submodularity of the combined function is not the classical set-submodularity,
but rather, a generalized version of submodularity over the integer lattice. Crucially, when our model is associated with such an influence function, it can be interpreted as a special instance of a monotone submodular
function maximization over the integer lattice subject to a knapsack constraint. This problem is known to
have an efficient algorithm whose approximation ratio of 1 − 1/e ≈ 0.632, which is best possible under P
6= NP assumption [40]. We then focus on social networks scenario, and introduce a natural budget-based
influence propagation model that we name Budgeted Triggering. This model extends many of the previously
studied influence models in networks. Most notably, it extends the well-known Triggering model [26], which
in itself generalizes several models such as the Independent Cascade and the Linear Threshold models. We
analyze this model within the two-stage framework mentioned above, and demonstrate that its underlying
influence function is monotone and submodular. Consequently, we can approximate this model to within a
factor of 1 − 1/e. We also consider a multi-player game that extends our model. In this game, there are
multiple players, each of which is interested to spend her budget in a way that maximizes her own network
influence. We establish that the price of anarchy (PoA) of this game is equal to 2. This result is derived by
extending the definition of a monotone utility game on the integer lattice [32]. Specifically, we show that one
of the conditions of the utility game can be relaxed, while still maintaining a PoA of at most 2, and that the
refined definition captures our budgeted influence model.
An online setting. In the online setting, there is unknown subset of individuals that arrive in a random order.
Whenever an individual arrives, the algorithm learns the marginal influence for each possible budget assignment, and needs to make an irrevocable decision regarding the allocation to that individual. This allocation
cannot be altered later on. Intuitively, this setting captures the case in which there is an unknown influence
function that is partially revealed with each arriving individual. Similarly to before, we focus on the case that
the influence function is monotone and submodular. Note that this setting is highly-motivated in practice. As
observed by Seeman and Singer [37], in many cases of interest, online merchants can only apply marketing
techniques on individuals who have engaged with them in some way, e.g., visited their online store. This
gives rise to a setting in which only a small unknown sample of individuals from a social network arrive in
an online fashion. We identify that this setting generalizes the submodular knapsack secretary problem [5],
which in turn, extends the well-known secretary problem [14]. We develop a 1/(15e) ≈ 0.025-competitive
algorithm for the problem. Importantly, our results not only apply to a more general setting, but also improve
the best known competitive bound for the former problem, which is 1/(20e) ≈ 0.018, due to Feldman, Naor
and Schwartz [17].
1.2
Related work
Models of influence spread in networks are well-studied in social science [22] and marketing literature [18].
Domingos and Richardson [13, 36] were the first to pose the question of finding influential individuals who
will maximize adoption through a word-of-mouth effect in a social network. Kempe, Kleinberg and Tardos [26, 27] formally modeled this question, and proved that several important models have submodular influence functions. Subsequent research have studied extended models and their characteristics [29, 34, 6, 24, 8,
39, 15, 37, 28, 12], and developed techniques for inferring influence models from observable data [20, 19, 31].
Influence maximization with multiple players has also been considered in the past [6, 21, 25]. Kempe et
al. [26], and very recently, Yang et al. [43], studied propagation models that have a similar flavor to our budgeted setting. We like to emphasize that there are several important distinctions between their models and
ours. Most importantly, their models assume a strong type of fractional diminishing returns property that our
integral model does not need to satisfy. Therefore, their models cannot capture the scenarios we describe.
The reader may refer to the cited papers and the references therein for a broader review of the literature.
2
Alon et al. [1] studied models of budget allocation in social networks. As already mentioned, our model
follows some of the design decisions in their approach. For example, their models support constraints on
the amount of budget that can be assigned to any individual. Such constraints are motivated by practical
marketing conditions set by policy makers and regulations. Furthermore, their models focus on a discrete
integral notion of a budget, which is consistent with common practices in many organizations (e.g., working
in multiplications of some fixed value) and related simulations [38]. We include those considerations in our
model as well. Alon et al. proved that one of their models, namely, the budget allocation over bipartite
influence model, admits an efficient (1 − 1/e)-approximation algorithm. This result was extended by Soma
et al. [40] to the problem of maximizing a monotone submodular function over the integer lattice subject to a
knapsack constraint. The algorithm for the above problems is a reminiscent of the algorithm for maximizing a
monotone submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint [41]. Note that none of those papers have
taken into consideration the secondary propagation process that occurs in social networks.
The classical secretary problem was introduced more than 50 years ago (e.g., [14]). Since its introduction,
many variants and extension of that problem have been proposed and analyzed [30, 2, 3, 4]. The problem that
is closest to the problem implied from our online model is the submodular knapsack secretary problem [5,
23, 17]. An instance of this problem consists of a set of n secretaries that arrive in a random order, each of
which has some intrinsic cost. An additional ingredient of the input is a monotone submodular set function
that quantifies the value gained from any subset of secretaries. The objective is to select a set of secretaries
of maximum value under the constraint that their overall cost is no more than a given budget parameter. Note
that our model extends this setting by having a more general influence function that is submodular over the
integer lattice. Essentially, this adds another layer of complexity to the problem as we are not only required
to decide which secretaries to select, but we also need to assign them budgets.
2 Preliminaries
We begin by introducing a very general budgeted influence propagation model. This model will be specialized
later when we consider the offline and online settings. In our model, there is a set of n agents and an influence
function f : Nn → R+ . Furthermore, there is a capacity vector c ∈ Nn+ and a budget B ∈ N+ . Our objective
is to compute a budget assignment to the agents b ∈ Nn , which maximizes the influence f (b). The vector b
must
Pn (1) respect the capacities, that is, 0 ≤ bi ≤ ci , for every i ∈ [n], (2) respect the total budget, namely,
i=1 bi ≤ B. In the following, we assume without loss of generality that each ci ≤ B.
We primarily focus on influence functions that maintain the properties of monotonicity and submodularity.
A function f : Nn → R+ is called monotone if f (x) ≤ f (y) whenever x ≤ y coordinate-wise, i.e., xi ≤ yi ,
for every i ∈ [n]. The definition of submodularity for functions over the integer lattice is a natural extension
of the classical definition of submodularity over sets (or boolean vectors):
Definition 2.1. A function f : Nn → R+ is said to be submodular over the integer lattice if f (x) + f (y) ≥
f (x ∨ y) + f (x ∧ y), for all integer vectors x and y, where x ∨ y and x ∧ y denote the coordinate-wise maxima
and minima, respectively. Specifically, (x ∨ y)i = max{xi , yi } and (x ∧ y)i = min{xi , yi }.
In the remainder of the paper, we abuse the term submodular to describe both set functions and functions
over the integer lattice. We also make the standard assumption of a value oracle access for the function f .
A value oracle for f allows us to query about f (x), for any vector x. The question of how to compute the
function f in an efficient (and approximate) way has spawned a large body of work in the context of social
networks (e.g., [26, 10, 9, 33, 11, 7]).
Notice that for the classical case of sets, the submodularity condition implies that f (S) + f (T ) ≥ f (S ∪
T ) + f (S ∩ T ), for every S, T ⊆ [n], and the monotonicity property implies that f (S) ≤ f (T ) if S ⊆ T .
3
An important distinction between the classical set setting and the integer lattice setting can be seen when we
consider the diminishing marginal returns property. This property is an equivalent definition of submodularity
of set functions, stating that f (S ∪ {i}) − f (S) ≥ f (T ∪ {i}) − f (T ), for every S ⊆ T and every i ∈
/ T.
However, this property, or more accurately, its natural extension, does not characterize submodularity over
the integer lattice, as observed by Soma et al. [40]. For example, there are simple examples of a submodular
function f for which
f (x + χi ) − f (x) ≥ f (x + 2χi ) − f (x + χi )
does not hold. Here, χi is the characteristic vector of the set {i}, so that x + kχi corresponds to an update of
x by adding an integral budget k to agent i. Note that a weaker variant of the diminishing marginal returns
does hold for submodular functions over the integer lattice.
Lemma 2.2 (Lem 2.2 [40]). Let f be a monotone submodular function over the integer lattice. For any
i ∈ [n], k ∈ N, and x ≤ y, it follows that
f (x ∨ kχi ) − f (x) ≥ f (y ∨ kχi ) − f (y) .
3 An Offline Model
In this section, we study the offline version of the budgeted influence propagation model. As already noted, we
consider budgeted influence propagation to be a two-stage process consisting of (1) direct influence related to
the budget assignment, followed by (2) influence related to a propagation process in the network. In particular,
in the first stage, the amount of budget allocated to an individual determines her level of effort and success
in influencing her direct friends. This natural assumption is consistent with previous work [1]. Then, in the
second stage, a word-of-mouth propagation process takes place in which additional individuals in the network
may become affected. Note that the allocated budgets do not play role at this stage.
We identify a large family of budget-based propagation functions that admit an efficient solution. Specifically, we first identify sufficient properties of the influence functions of both stages, which give rise to a
resulting (combined) influence function that is monotone and submodular. Consequently, our model can be
interpreted as an instance of a monotone submodular function maximization over the integer lattice subject
to a knapsack constraint. This problem is known to have an efficient (1 − 1/e)-approximation [40], which
is best possible under the assumption that P 6= NP. This NP-hardness bound of 1 − 1/e already holds for the
special case of maximum coverage [16, 1].
We subsequently develop a natural model of budgeted influence propagation in social networks that we
name Budgeted Triggering. This model generalizes many settings, including the well-known Triggering
model. Note that the Triggering model already extends several models used to capture the spread of influence
in networks, like the Independent Cascade, Linear Threshold, and Listen Once models [26]. We demonstrate
that the influence function defined by this model is monotone and submodular, and thus, admits an efficient
(1 − 1/e)-approximation. Technically, we achieve this result by demonstrating that the two-stage influence
functions that underlie this model satisfy the sufficient properties mentioned above.
Finally, we study an extension of the Budgeted Triggering model to a multi-player game. In this game,
there are multiple self-interested players (e.g., advertisers), each of which is interested to spend her budget in
a way that maximizes her own network influence. We establish that the price of anarchy (PoA) of the game is
exactly 2. In fact, we prove that this result holds for a much more general type of games. Maehara et al. [32]
recently defined the notion of a monotone utility game on the integer lattice, and demonstrated that its PoA
is at most 2. Their utility game definition does not capture our multi-player game. We show that one of the
conditions in their game definition can be relaxed while still maintaining the same PoA. Crucially, this relaxed
definition captures our model.
4
3.1
A two-stage influence composition
The two-stage process can be formally interpreted as a composition of two influence functions, f = h◦g. The
first function g : Nn → {0, 1}n captures the set of influenced agents for a given budget allocation, while the
second function h : {0, 1}n → R+ captures the overall number (or value) of influenced agents, given some
seed agent set for a propagation process. In particular, the influenced agents of the first stage are the seed set
for the second stage. We next describe sufficient conditions for the functions g and h which guarantee that
their composition is monotone and submodular over the integer lattice. Note that we henceforth use notation
related to sets and their binary vector representation interchangeably.
Definition 3.1. A function g : Nn → {0, 1}n is said to be coordinate independent if it satisfies g(x ∨ y) ≤
g(x) ∨ g(y), for any x, y ∈ Nn .
Definition 3.2. A function g : Nn → {0, 1}n is said to be monotone if g(x) ≤ g(y) coordinate-wise whenever
x ≤ y coordinate-wise.
Many natural influence functions are coordinate independent. One such example is the family of functions
in which the output vector is a coordinate-wise disjunction over a set of n vectors, each of which captures the
independent influence implied by some agent. Specifically, the ith vector in the disjunction is the result of
some function fi : N → {0, 1}n indicating the affected agents as a result of any budget allocation assigned
only to agent i. We are now ready to prove our composition lemma.
Lemma 3.3. Given a monotone coordinate independent function g : Nn → {0, 1}n and a monotone submodular function h : {0, 1}n → R+ , the composition f = h ◦ g : Nn → R+ is a monotone submodular function
over the integer lattice.
Proof. The coordinate independence properties of g and the monotonicity of h imply that
h(g(x) ∨ g(y)) ≥ h(g(x ∨ y)).
In addition, from the monotonicity of g we know that g(x ∧ y) ≤ g(x) and g(x ∧ y) ≤ g(y). Thus, together
with the monotonicity of h, we get that
h(g(x) ∧ g(y)) ≥ h(g(x ∧ y)).
Utilizing the above results, we attain that f is submodular since
f (x) + f (y) = h(g(x)) + h(g(y))
≥ h(g(x) ∨ g(y)) + h(g(x) ∧ g(y))
≥ h(g(x ∨ y)) + h(g(x ∧ y))
= f (x ∨ y) + f (x ∧ y) ,
where the first inequality is by the submodularity of h.
We complete the proof by noting that f is monotone since both g and h are monotone. Formally, given
x ≤ y then it follows that f (x) = h(g(x)) ≤ h(g(y)) = f (y) by h’s monotonicity and since g(x) ≤ g(y) by
g’s monotonicity.
As a corollary of the lemma, we get the following theorem.
5
Theorem 3.4. Given a monotone coordinate independent function g : Nn → {0, 1}n and a monotone submodular function h : {0, 1}n → R+ , there is a (1 − 1/e)-approximation algorithm for maximizing the
influence function f = h ◦ g : Nn → R+ under capacity constraints c ∈ Nn+ and a budget constraint
B ∈ N+ , whose running time is polynomial in n, B, and the query time of the value oracle for f .
Proof. We know by Lemma 3.3 that f is monotone and submodular. Consequently, we attain an instance of
maximizing a monotone submodular function over the integer lattice subject to a knapsack constraint. Soma
et al. [40] recently studied this problem, and developed a (1 − 1/e)-approximation algorithm whose running
time is polynomial in n, B, and the query time for the value oracle of the submodular function.
3.2
The budgeted triggering model
We now focus on social networks, and introduce a natural budget-based influence model that we call the
Budgeted Triggering model. This model consists of a social network, represented by a directed graph G =
(V, E) with n nodes (agents) and a set E of directed edges (relationships between agents). In addition, there
is a function f : Nn → R+ that quantifies the influence of any budget allocation b ∈ Nn to the agents. The
concrete form of f strongly depends on the structure of the network, as described later. The objective is to
find a budget allocation b that maximizes the numberPof influenced nodes, while respecting the feasibility
constraints: (1) bi ≤ ci , for every node i ∈ V , and (2) i∈V bi ≤ B.
For ease of presentation, we begin by describing the classic Triggering model [26]. Let N (v) be the set
of neighbors of node v in the graph. The influence function implied by a Triggering model is defined by the
following simple process. Every node v ∈ V independently chooses a random triggering set T v ⊆ N (v)
among its neighbors according to some fixed distribution. Then, for any given seed set of nodes, its influence
value is defined as the result of a deterministic cascade process in the network which works in steps. In the
first step, only the selected seed set is affected. At step ℓ, each node v that is still not influenced becomes
influenced if any of its neighbors in T v became influenced at time ℓ − 1. This process terminates after at most
n rounds.
Our generalized model introduces the notion of budgets into this process. Specifically, the influence function in our case adheres to the following process. Every node v independently chooses a random triggering
vector tv ∈ N|N (v)| according to some fixed distribution. Given a budget allocation b ∈ Nn , the influence
value of that allocation is the result of the following deterministic cascade process. In the first step, every
node v that was allocated a budget bv > 0 becomes affected. At step ℓ, every node v that is still not influenced
becomes influenced if any of its neighbors u ∈ N (v) became influenced at time ℓ − 1 and bu ≥ tvu . One can
easily verify that the Triggering model is a special case of our Budgeted Triggering model, where the capacity
vector c = 1n , and each tvu = 0 if u ∈ T v , and tvu = B + 1, otherwise.
Intuitively, the triggering vectors in our model capture the amount of effort that is required from each
neighbor of some agent to affect her. Of course, the underlying assumption is that the effort of individuals
correlates with the budget they receive. As an example, consider the case that a node v selects a triggering
value tvu = 1 for some neighbor u. In this case, u can only influence v if it receives a budget of at least 1.
However, if v selects a value tvu = 0 then it is enough that u becomes affected in order to influence v. In
particular, it is possible that u does not get any budget but still influences v after it becomes affected in the
cascade process.
Given a budget allocation b, the value of the influence function f (b) is the expected number of nodes
influenced in the cascade process, where the expectation is taken over the random choices of the model.
Formally, let σ be some fixed choice of the triggering vectors of all nodes (according to the model distribution),
and let Pr(σ) be the probability of this outcome. Let fσ (b) be the (deterministic) number of
Pnodes influenced
when the triggering vectors are defined by σ and the budget allocation is b. Then, f (b) = σ Pr(σ) · fσ (b).
6
Theorem 3.5. There is a (1 − 1/e)-approximation algorithm for influence maximization under the Budgeted
Triggering model whose running time is polynomial in n, B, and the query time of the value oracle for the
influence function.
Proof. Consider an influence function f : Nn → R+ resulting from the Budgeted Triggering model. We next
show that the function f is monotone and submodular over the integer lattice. As a result, our model can be
interpreted as an instance of maximizing a monotone submodular function over the integer lattice subject to
a knapsack constraint, which admits an efficient (1 − 1/e)-approximation. Notice that it is sufficient to prove
that each (deterministic) function fσ is monotone submodular function over the integer lattice. This follows as
f is a non-negative linear combination of all fσ . One can easily validate that submodularity and monotonicity
are closed under non-negative linear combinations.
Consider some function fσ : Nn → R+ . For the purpose of establishing that fσ is monotone and submodular, we show that fσ can be interpreted as a combination of a monotone coordinate independent function
gσ : Nn → {0, 1}n , and a monotone submodular function hσ : {0, 1}n → R+ . The theorem then follows
by utilizing Lemma 3.3. We divide the diffusion process into two stages. In the first stage, we consider the
function gσ , which given a budget allocation returns (the characteristic vector of) the set S of all the nodes
that were allocated a positive budget along with their immediate neighbors that were influenced according to
the Budgeted Triggering model. Formally,
gσ (b) = S , v : bv > 0 ∪ u : ∃v ∈ N (u), bv > 0, bv ≥ tuv .
In the second stage, we consider the function hσ that receives (the characteristic vector of) S as its seed set,
and makes the (original) Triggering model interpretation of the vectors. Specifically, the triggering set of
each node v is considered to be T v = {u : tvu = 0}. Intuitively, the function gσ captures the initial budget
allocation step and the first step of the propagation process, while the function hσ captures all the remaining
steps of the propagation. Observe that fσ = hσ ◦ gσ by our construction. Also notice that hσ is trivially
monotone and submodular as it is the result of a Triggering model [26, Thm. 4.2]. Therefore, we are left to
analyze the function gσ , and prove that it is monotone and coordinate independent. The next claim establishes
these properties, and completes the proof of the theorem.
Claim 3.6. The function gσ is monotone and coordinate independent.
Proof. Let x, y ∈ Nn , and denote w = x ∨ y. We establish coordinate independence by considering each
influenced node in gσ (w) separately. Recall that gσ (w) consist of the union of two sets {v : wv > 0} and
{u : ∃v ∈ N (u), wv > 0, wv ≥ tuv }. Consider a node v for which wv > 0. Since wv = max{xv , yv }, we
know that at least one of {xv , yv } is equal to wv , say wv = xv . Hence, v ∈ gσ (x). Now, consider a node
u ∈ gσ (w) having wu = 0. It must be the case that u is influenced by one of its neighbors v. Clearly, wv > 0
and wv ≥ tuv . Again, we can assume without loss of generality that wv = xv , and get that u ∈ gσ (x). This
implies that for each v ∈ gσ (x ∨ y), either v ∈ gσ (x) or v ∈ gσ (y), proving coordinate independence, i.e.,
gσ (x ∨ y) ≤ gσ (x) ∨ gσ (y).
We prove monotonicity in a similar way. Let x ≤ y. Consider a node v ∈ gσ (x) for which xv > 0. Since
yv ≥ xv > 0, we know that v ∈ gσ (y). Now, consider a node u ∈ gσ (x) having xu = 0. There must be a
node v ∈ N (u) such that xv > 0, and xv ≥ tuv . Accordingly, we get that yv ≥ tuv , and hence, u ∈ gσ (y). This
implies that gσ (x) ≤ gσ (y), which completes the proof.
3.3
A multi-player budgeted influence game
We now focus on a multi-player budgeted influence game. In the general setting of the game, which is
i M
formally defined by the tuple (M, (Ai )M
i=1 , (f )i=1 ), there are M self-interested players, each of which needs
7
to decide how to allocate its budget B i ∈ N+ among n agents. Each player has a capacity vector ci ∈ Nn+ that
bounds the amount of budget she may allocate to every agent. The budget assignment of player i is denoted
The strategy of player i is feasible if it respects the constraints:
by bi ∈ Nn+ , and is referred to as its strategy.
P
(1) bij ≤ cij , for every j ∈ [n], and (2) nj=1 bij ≤ B i . Let Ai be the set of all feasible strategies for player i.
Note that we allow mixed (randomized) strategies. Each player has an influence function f i : NM ×n → R+
that designates her own influence (payoff) in the game. Specifically, f i (b) is the payoff of player i for the
budget allocation b of all players. This can also be written as f i (bi , b−i ), where the strategy of i is bi and the
strategies of all the other players are marked as b−i . Note that the goal of each player is to maximize
PM i her own
influence, given her feasibility constraints and the strategies of other players. Let F (b) = i=1 f (b) be the
social utility of all players in the game.
One of the most commonly used notions in game theory is Nash equilibrium (NE) [35]. This notion
translates to our game as follows: A budget allocation b is said to be in a NE if f i (bi , b−i ) ≥ f i (b̃i , b−i ), for
every i and b̃i ∈ Ai .
Monotone utility game on the integer lattice. We begin by studying a monotone utility game on the integer
lattice, and establish that its PoA is no more than 2. Later on, we demonstrate that our Budgeted Triggering
model can be captured by this game. Utility games were defined for submodular set functions by Vetta [42],
and later extended to submodular functions on the integer lattice by Maehara et al. [32]. We build on the latter
work, and demonstrate that one of the conditions in their utility game definition, namely, the requirement that
the submodular function satisfies component-wise concavity, can be neglected. Note that component-wise
concavity corresponds to the diminishing marginal returns property, which does not characterize submodularity over the integer lattice, as noted in Section 2. Therefore, removing this constraint is essential for proving
results for our model.
We refine the definition of a monotone utility game on the integer lattice [32], so it only satisfies the
following conditions:
(U1) F (b) is a monotone submodular function on the integer lattice.
P
i
(U2) F (b) ≥ M
i=1 f (b).
(U3) f i (b) ≥ F (bi , b−i ) − F (0, b−i ), for every i ∈ [M ].
Theorem 3.7. The price of anarchy of the monotone utility game designated by U1-U3 is at most 2.
1
M
Proof. Let b∗ = (b1∗ , . . . , bM
∗ ) be the social optimal budget allocation, and let b = (b , . . . , b ) be a budget
i
1
i
allocation in Nash equilibrium. Let b̃ = (b∗ , . . . , b∗ , 0, . . . , 0) be the optimal budget allocation restricted to
the first i players. Notice that
F (b∗ ) − F (b) ≤ F (b∗ ∨ b) − F (b)
=
M
X
F (b̃i ∨ b) − F (b̃i−1 ∨ b)
i=1
≤
M
X
F (bi∗ ∨ bi , b−i ) − F (bi , b−i ) ,
i=1
where the first inequality is due to the monotonicity of F , the equality holds by a telescoping sum, and the
last inequality is due to submodularity of F . Specifically, submodularity implies that inequality since
F (bi∗ ∨ bi , b−i ) + F (b̃i−1 ∨ b) ≥ F (b̃i ∨ b) + F (bi , b−i ) .
8
Now, observe that
F (bi , b−i ) + F (bi∗ , b−i ) ≥ F (bi∗ ∨ bi , b−i ) + F (bi∗ ∧ bi , b−i ) ≥ F (bi∗ ∨ bi , b−i ) + F (0, b−i ) .
Here, the first inequality holds by the submodularity of F , while the last inequality follows from the monotonicity of F . Consequently, we derive that
F (b∗ ) − F (b) ≤
M
X
F (bi∗ , b−i ) − F (0, b−i ) ≤
M
X
i=1
i=1
f i (bi∗ , b−i ) ≤
M
X
f i (bi , b−i ) ≤ F (b) ,
i=1
where the second inequality is by condition (U3) of the utility game, the third inequality holds since b is a
Nash equilibrium, and the last inequality is by condition (U2) of the utility game. This completes the proof as
F (b∗ ) ≤ 2F (b).
A multi-player Budgeted Triggering model. We extend the Budgeted Triggering model to a multi-player
setting. As before, we have a social network, represented by a directed graph G = (V, E), such that every
node v has an independent random triggering vector tv ∈ N|N (v)| . Each player i has a budget B i ∈ N+ , and
a function f i : NM ×n → R+ that quantifies her influence, given the budget allocation of all players. The
objective of each player i is to find a budget allocation bi , given the budget allocations of other players, that
maximizes the number of nodes that she influences, while respecting the feasibility constraints: (1) bij ≤ cij ,
P
for every node j ∈ V , and (2) j∈V bij ≤ B.
The process in which nodes become affected is very similar to that in Budgeted Triggering, but needs some
refinement for the multi-player setting. We follow most design decisions of Bharathi et al. [6]. Specifically,
whenever a player influences a node, this node is assigned the color of that player. Once a node become
influenced, its color cannot change anymore. If two or more players provide positive budgets to the same
node, then the node is given the color of the player that provided the highest budget. In case there are several
such players, the node is assigned a color uniformly at random among the set of players with the highest
budget assignment. If a node u becomes influenced at step ℓ, it attempts to influence each of its neighbors. If
the activation attempt from u to its neighbor v succeeds, which is based on the triggering vector of v, then v
becomes influenced with the same color as u at step ℓ + Tuv , assuming that it has not been influenced yet. All
Tuv ’s are independent positive continuous random variables. This essentially prevents simultaneous activation
attempts by multiple neighbors.
PM i
Lemma 3.8. The social function F (b) =
i=1 f (b) is a monotone submodular function on the integer
lattice.
Proof. We prove this lemma along similar lines to those in the proof of Theorem 3.5, which attains to the
single-player scenario. Let σ be some fixed choice of triggering vectors of all nodes and all the activation
times Tuv . We also assume that σ encodes other random decisions in the model, namely, all tie-breaking
choices related to equal (highest) budget assignments for nodes. Let Fσ (b) be the deterministic
number of
P
influenced nodes for the random choices σ and the budget allocation b, and note that F (b) = σ Pr(σ)·Fσ (b).
Similar to Theorem 3.5, it is sufficient to prove that Fσ is monotone submodular function on the integer
lattice. Again, we view the social influence as a two-stage process. In the first step, we consider a function
Gσ : NM ×n → {0, 1}n that given the budget allocation of all players returns a set S of immediate influenced
nodes. Formally,
Gσ (b) = S , v : ∃i, biv > 0 ∪ u : ∃v ∈ N (u), ∃i, biv > 0, biv ≥ tuv .
9
In the second stage, we consider the function Hσ that receives S as its seed set, and makes the original
Triggering model interpretation of the vectors, that is, it sets each T v = {u : tvu = 0}. Notice that the fact
that there are multiple players at this stage does not change the social outcome, i.e., the number of influenced
nodes, comparing to a single-player scenario. The only difference relates to the identity of the player that
affects every node. This implies that Hσ is monotone and submodular as its result is identical to that of the
original (single-player) Triggering model [26]. Observe that Fσ = Hσ ◦ Gσ by our construction. Therefore,
by Lemma 3.3, we are left to establish that the function Gσ is monotone and coordinate independent. The
next claim proves that.
Claim 3.9. The function Gσ is monotone and coordinate independent.
We prove this claim using almost identical line of argumentation to that in Claim 3.6. Let x, y ∈ NM ×n ,
and denote w = x ∨ y. We establish coordinate independence by considering every affected node in
Gσ (w) separately. Recall that Gσ (w) consist of the union of two sets {v : ∃i, wvi > 0} and {u : ∃v ∈
N (u), ∃i, wvi > 0, wvi ≥ tuv }. Consider a node v that has some player i with wvi > 0. Since wvi =
max{xiv , yvi }, we know that at least one of {xiv , yvi } is equal to wvi , say wvi = xiv . Hence, v ∈ Gσ (x), since
in particular, player i competes on influencing v. Now, consider a node u ∈ Gσ (w) with wui = 0, for all i. It
must be the case that u is influenced by one of its neighbors v. Clearly, there exists some player i such that
wvi > 0 and wvi ≥ tuv . Again, we can assume without loss of generality that wvi = xiv , and get that u ∈ Gσ (x),
since in particular, player i competes on influencing u via v. This implies that for each v ∈ Gσ (x ∨ y), either
v ∈ Gσ (x) or v ∈ Gσ (y), proving coordinate independence, i.e., Gσ (x ∨ y) ≤ Gσ (x) ∨ Gσ (y).
We prove monotonicity in a similar way. Let x ≤ y. Consider a node v ∈ Gσ (x) such that there is a
player i for which xiv > 0. Since yvi ≥ xiv > 0, we know that player i competes on influencing v, and thus,
v ∈ Gσ (y). Now, consider a node u ∈ Gσ (x) with xiu = 0, for all i. There must be a node v ∈ N (u)
and a player i such that xiv > 0 and xiv ≥ tuv . Accordingly, we get that yvi ≥ tuv . Therefore, player i also
competes on influencing u via v, and thus, u ∈ Gσ (y). This implies that Gσ (x) ≤ Gσ (y), which completes
the proof.
Theorem 3.10. The Budgeted Triggering model with multiple players has a PoA of exactly 2.
Proof. We begin by demonstrating that the model satisfies conditions U1-U3 of the monotone utility game
on the integer lattice. As a result, we can apply Theorem 3.7 to attain an upper bound of 2 on the PoA of the
model. Notice that condition (U1) holds by Lemma 3.8. Also, condition (U2) trivially holds by the definition
of the social function F .
For the purpose of proving that the model satisfies condition (U3), let σ be some fixed choice of triggering
vectors of all nodes and all the activation times Tuv . We also assume that σ encodes other random decisions
in the model, namely, all tie-breaking choices related to equal (highest) budget assignments for nodes. Let
Fσ (b) be the deterministic number of influenced nodes for the random choices σ and the budget allocation
b. Finally, let fσi (b) be the deterministic number of nodes influenced by player i for the random choices σ
and the budget allocation b. We next argue that fσi (b) ≥ Fσ (bi , b−i ) − Fσ (0, b−i ), for any σ. Notice that this
implies condition (U3) since
X
X
f i (b) =
Pr(σ)fσi (b) ≥
Pr(σ) Fσ (bi , b−i ) − Fσ (0, b−i ) = F (bi , b−i ) − F (0, b−i ) .
σ
σ
We turn to prove the above argument. Notice that it is sufficient to focus only on cases that Fσ (bi , b−i ) >
Fσ (0, b−i ), since otherwise, the argument is trivially true as fσi (b) ≥ 0. We concentrate on all nodes u that
are not influenced by any player when the mutual strategy is (0, b−i ), but became influenced for a strategy
(bi , b−i ). We claim that all those nodes must be assigned the color of player i. It is easy to verify that
10
increasing the budget assignment of a player to any node can only negatively affect other players, that is,
they may only influence a subset of the nodes. This follows as all the activation results are deterministically
encoded in the choices σ, so adding a competition can only make the outcome worse, i.e., players may not
affect a node that they previously did. This implies the claim. As a result, fσi (b) ≥ Fσ (bi , b−i ) − Fσ (0, b−i ).
This completes the proof that the model is an instance of the monotone utility game on the integer lattice, and
thus, has a PoA of at most 2.
We proceed by proving the tightness of the PoA result. We show there is an instance of the multi-player
Budget Triggering model whose PoA is 2N/(N + 1). Notice that as N → ∞, the lower bound on the
PoA tends to 2. This instance has been presented in a slightly different context by He and Kempe [25,
Proposition 1]. Concretely, the input graph is a union of a star with one center and N leaves, and N additional
(isolated) nodes. The triggering vectors are selected from a degenerate distribution that essentially implies
that each activated node also activates all of its neighbors. Every player has one unit of budget. One can
easily verify that the solution in which all players assign their unit budget to the center of the star is a NE.
This follows since the expected payoff for each player is (N + 1)/N , while unilaterally moving the budget
to any other node leads to a payoff of 1. However, the strategy that optimizes the social utility is to place one
unit of budget at the center of the star graph, and the remaining budget units at different isolated nodes.
4 An Online Model
We study the online version of the budgeted influence propagation model. This setting can capture scenarios
in which the social influences in a network are known in advance, but the (subset of) agents that will arrive and
their order is unknown. The input for this setting is identical to that of the offline variant with the exception
that the n agents arrive in an online fashion. This intuitively means that we do not know the monotone
submodular influence function f : Nn → R+ in advance, but rather, it is revealed to us gradually with time.
More specifically, upon the arrival of the ith agent, we can infer the (constrained) function fi , which quantifies
the influence of f for the set of the first i agents, while fixing the budget of all other agents to 0. Note that we
also learn the maximum budget ci that can be allocated to agent i whenever she arrives. For every arriving
agent i, the algorithm needs to make an irrevocable decision regarding the amount of budget bi allocated to that
agent without knowing the potential contribution of future arriving agents. As mentioned in the introduction,
this problem is a generalization of the classical secretary problem. This immediately implies that any online
algorithm preforms very poorly under an unrestricted adversarial arrival of the agents. We therefore follow
the standard assumption that the agents and their influence are fixed in advanced, but their order of arrival is
random. Note that the overall influence of some budget allocation to the agents is not affected by the arrival
order of the agents.
We analyze the performance of our algorithm, ON, using the competitive analysis paradigm. Note that
competitive analysis focuses on quantifying the cost that online algorithms suffer due to their complete lack
of knowledge regarding the future, and it does not take into account computational complexity. Let OPT be
an optimal algorithm for the offline setting. Given an input instance I for the problem, we let OPT(I) and
ON(I) be the influence values that OPT and ON attain for I, respectively. We say that ON is c-competitive
if inf I E[ON(I)]/OPT(I) ≥ c, where E[ON(I)] is the expected value taken over the random choices of the
algorithm and the random arrival order of the agents. We like to note that our algorithm and its analysis are
inspired by the results of Feldman et al. [17] for the submodular knapsack secretary problem. However, we
make several novel observations and identify some interesting structural properties that enable us to simultaneously generalize and improve their results. Also note that in the interests of expositional simplicity, we
have not tried to optimize the constants in our analysis.
11
Theorem 4.1. There is an online randomized algorithm that achieves 1/(15e) ≈ 0.025-competitive ratio for
the budgeted influence maximization problem.
Proof. Recall that an instance of the online budgeted influence maximization problem consists of a set of
n agents that arrive in a random order, a budget constraint B ∈ N+ , capacity constraints c ∈ Nn+ , and a
monotone submodular influence function over the integer lattice f : Nn → R+ . We begin by describing
the main component of our algorithm. This component is built to address the case that the contribution
of each agent is relatively small with respect to the optimal solution. That is, even when one assigns the
maximum feasible budget to any single agent, the contribution of that agent is still small compared to the
optimum. We refer to this component as light influence algorithm (abbreviated, LI). This component will
be later complemented with another component, derived from the classical secretary algorithm, to deal with
highly influential agents.
Let ha1 , a2 , . . . , an i be an arbitrary fixed ordering of the set of agents. This is not necessarily the arrival order of the agents. Algorithm light influence, formally described below, assumes that each agent ai
is assigned a uniform continuous random variable ti ∈ [0, 1) that determines its arrival time. Note that this
assumption does not add restrictions on the model since one can create a set of n samples of the uniform distribution from the range [0, 1) in advance, and assign them by a non-decreasing order to each arriving agent
(see, e.g., the discussion in [17]).
The algorithm begins by exploring the first part of the agent sequence, that is, the agents in L = {ai :
ti ≤ 1/2}. Note that it does not allocate any budget to those agents. Let bL be an optimal (offline) budget
allocation for the restricted instance that only consists of the agents in L, and let f (bL ) be its influence value.
Furthermore, let f (bL )/B be a lower bound on the average contribution of each unit of budget in that solution.
The algorithm continues by considering the remainder of the sequence. For each arriving agent, it allocates
a budget of k if the increase in the overall influence value is at least αkf (bL )/B, for some fixed α to be
determined later. That is, the average influence contribution of an each unit of budget is (up to the α-factor)
at least as large as the average unit contribution in the optimal solution for the first part. If there are several
budget allocations that satisfy the above condition then the algorithm allocates the maximal amount of budget
that still satisfies the capacity and budget constraints.
Prior to formally describing our algorithm, we like to remind that χi corresponds to the characteristic
vector of ai , i.e., (χi )i = 1 and (χi )j = 0 for every j 6= i. Accordingly, if b ∈ Nn is a budget allocation
vector in which the ith coordinate represents the allocation to agent ai , and bi = 0, then the allocation b ∨ kχi
corresponds to an update of b by adding a budget k to agent ai . We say that the marginal value of assigning
k units of budget to ai is f (b ∨ kχi ) − f (b), and the marginal value per unit is (f (b ∨ kχi ) − f (b))/k.
Having described our main component, we are now ready to complete the description of our algorithm. As
already , we randomly combine algorithm LI with the classical algorithm for the secretary problem. Specifically, algorithm LI is employed with probability 5/8 and the classical secretary algorithm with probability
3/8. This latter algorithm assigns a maximal amount of budget to a single agent ai to attain an influence value
of f (ci χi ). The algorithm selects ai by disregarding the first n/e agents that arrive, and then picking the first
agent whose influence value is better than any of the values of the first n/e agents. This optimal algorithm is
known to succeed in finding the single agent with the best influence with probability of 1/e [14].
4.1
Analysis
We begin by analyzing the performance guarantee of algorithm LI, and later analyze the complete algorithm.
Let OPT∗ = [OPT∗1 , . . . , OPT∗n ] be the optimal budget allocation for a given instance, and let OPTL be the
L
∗
budget allocation for the agents in L, that is, OPTL
i = OPTi whenever i ∈ L and OPTi = 0, otherwise.
R
R
Similarly, OPT is the budget allocation for the agents in R = [n] \ L, i.e., OPTi = OPT∗i for i ∈ R, and
12
Algorithm 1: Light Influence (LI)
Input : an online sequence of n agents, a budget constraint B ∈ N+ , capacity constraints c ∈ Nn+ , a monotone
submodular function f : Nn → R+ , a parameter α ∈ R+
Output: A budget allocation b
b ← (0, 0, . . . , 0)
f (bL ) ← value of the optimal budget allocation for agents in L = {ai : ti ≤ 1/2}
for every agent
ai such that ti ∈ (1/2, 1] do
P
Ki ← k ≤ ci : f (b ∨ kχi ) − f (b) ≥ αkf (bL )/B ∪ k + j6=i bj ≤ B
if Ki 6= ∅ then
k ← maxk {Ki }
b ← b ∨ kχi
end
end
return b
Algorithm 2: Online Influence Maximization
Input : an online sequence of n agents, a budget constraint B ∈ N+ , capacity constraints c ∈ Nn+ , a monotone
submodular function f : Nn → R+ , a parameter α ∈ R+
Output: A budget allocation b
r ← random number in [0, 1]
if r ∈ [0, 3/8] then
b ← run the classical secretary algorithm with (n, B, c, f )
else if r ∈ (3/8, 1] then
b ← run algorithm LI with (n, B, c, f, α)
end
return b
OPTR
/ R. Recall that algorithm LI attends to the case in which no single agent has a significant
i = 0 for i ∈
influence contribution compared to the optimal value. More formally, let β = maxi f (ci χi )/f (OPT∗ ) be the
ratio between the maximal contribution of a single agent and the optimal value.
Lemma 4.2. If α ≥ 2β then f (b) ≥ min{αf (OPTL )/2, f (OPTR ) − αf (OPT∗ )}.
Proof. We prove this lemma by bounding the expected influence value of the algorithm in two cases and
taking the minimum of them:
Case I: Algorithm LI allocates a budget of more than B/2 units. We know that the algorithm attains a value
of at least αf (bL )/B from each allocated budget unit by the selection rule f (b ∨ ki χi ) − f (b) ≥ αkf (bL )/B.
Hence, the total influence of this allocation is at least
f (b) >
αf (bL )
αf (OPTL )
B αf (bL )
·
=
≥
.
2
B
2
2
Case II: Algorithm LI allocates at most B/2 budget units. We utilize the following lemma proven in [40,
Lem 2.3].
Lemma 4.3. Let f be a monotone submodular function over the integer lattice. For arbitrary x, y,
X
f (x ∨ y) ≤ f (x) +
f (x ∨ yi χi ) − f (x) .
i∈[n]:
yi >xi
13
This lemma applied to our case implies that
f (b ∨ OPTR ) ≤ f (b) +
X
i∈[n]:
OPTR
i >bi
f (b ∨ OPTR
i χi ) − f (b) .
(1)
We consider two sub-cases:
Subcase A: There is ℓ ∈ [n] such that OPTR
ℓ > B/2. Clearly, there can only be one agent ℓ having this
∗
property. One can easily validate that f (b ∨ OPTR
ℓ χℓ ) − f (b) ≤ β · f (OPT ) by the definition of β and
R
Lemma 2.2. Now, consider any agent i 6= ℓ with OPTi > bi . The reasonP
that the optimal solution allocated
more budget to i than our algorithm cannot be the lack of budget since i bi < B/2 and OPTR
i < B/2.
Hence, it must be the case that
f (bL )
f (b ∨ OPTR
i χi ) − f (b)
<
α
,
(2)
B
OPTR
i
by the selection rule of the algorithm. Note that b in the above equation designates the budget allocation at
the time that the agent ai was considered and not the final allocation. However, due to the weak version of
marginal diminishing returns that was described in Lemma 2.2, the inequality also holds for the final allocation
vector. As a result,
f (OPTR ) ≤ f (b ∨ OPTR )
≤ f (b) + f (b ∨ OPTR
ℓ χℓ ) − f (b) +
X
i∈[n]\{ℓ}:
OPTR
i >bi
f (b ∨ OPTR
i χi ) − f (b)
f (bL ) B
·
≤ f (b) + βf (OPT∗ ) + α
B 2
α
,
≤ f (b) + f (OPT∗ ) · β +
2
where the first inequality follows due to the monotonicity of f , and the third inequality uses the sub-case
assumption
that there is one agent that receives at least half of the overall budget in OPTR , and thus,
P
R
R
∗
i6=ℓ OPTi ≤ B/2. Recall that α ≥ 2β, and thus, f (b) ≥ f (OPT ) − αf (OPT ).
Subcase B: OPTR
i ≤ B/2, for every i ∈ [n]. The analysis of this sub-case follows the same argumentation of
the previous sub-case. Notice that for every agent i ∈ [n] such that OPTR
i > bi , we can apply inequality (2).
Consequently, we can utilize inequality (1), and get that
f (OPTR ) ≤ f (b ∨ OPTR ) ≤ f (b) +
X
i∈[n]:
OPTR
i >bi
f (bL )
f (b ∨ OPTR
·B ,
i χi ) − f (b) ≤ f (b) + α
B
which implies that f (b) ≥ f (OPTR ) − αf (OPT∗ ).
Recall that we considered some arbitrary fixed ordering of the agents ha1 , a2 , . . . , an i that is not necessary
their arrival order. Let wi the marginal contribution of agent ai to the optimal value when calculated according
to this order. Namely, let OPT∗<i = [OPT∗1 , . . . , OPT∗i−1 , 0, . . . , 0] be the allocation giving the same budget
as OPT∗ for every agent aj with j < i, and 0 for the rest, and define wi = f (OPT∗<i ∨OPT∗i χi )−f (OPT<i ).
This point of view allow us to associate fixed parts of the optimal value to the agents in a way that is not
affected
by their order of arrival. Let Xi be a random indicator for the event that ai ∈ L, and let W =
Pn
i=1 wi Xi . Let α ≥ 2β to be determined later.
14
By the weak version of marginal
in Lemma 2.2, it holds that f (OPTL ) ≥
Pn diminishing returns specified
R
∗
W , and similarly, f (OPT ) ≥ i=1 wi (1 − Xi ) = f (OPT ) − W . Using this observation, in conjunction
with Lemma 4.2, we get that f (b) ≥ min{αW/2, f (OPT∗ )·(1−α−W/f (OPT∗ ))}. Let Y = W/f (OPT∗ ),
and observe that
f (b) ≥ f (OPT∗ ) · min{αY /2, 1 − α − Y } .
(3)
Note that Y ∈ [0, 1] captures the ratio between the expected optimum value associated with the agents in L
and the (overall) optimum value. We continue to bound the expected value of f (b) by proving the following
lemma.
Lemma 4.4. Let α = 2/5 and assume that β ≤ 1/5, then,
E[f (b)] ≥
p 2
f (OPT∗ )
· 1− β .
20
Proof. By assigning α = 2/5 to the bound in inequality 3, we obtain that
Y 3
∗
, −Y .
f (b) ≥ f (OPT ) · min
5 5
Notice that the expected value of f (b) is
∗
E[f (b)] ≥ f (OPT )
Z
3
5
′
[Pr(Y ≤ γ)] · min
0
γ 3
, − γ dγ ,
5 5
since [Pr(Y ≤ γ)]′ is the probability density function of Y . Now, observe that we can split the integral range
into two parts
∗
E[f (b)] ≥ f (OPT )
f (OPT∗ )
≥
5
Z
1
2
[Pr(Y ≤ γ)]
0
Z
′γ
1
2
5
∗
dγ + f (OPT )
Z
3
5
1
2
′
[Pr(Y ≤ γ)]
[Pr(Y ≤ γ)]′ γdγ.
3
− γ dγ
5
(4)
0
To bound Pr(Y ≤ γ), we use Chebyshev’s inequality, while noting that
E[Y ] =
n
X
wi E[Xi ]/f (OPT∗ ) = W/(2f (OPT∗ )) = 1/2 ,
i=1
since E[Xi ] = 1/2 and W = f (OPT∗ ). Now,
1
β
Var[Y ]
Pr Y −
≤ 2 ,
≥c ≤
2
c2
4c
where the last inequality follows from [17, Lem B.5]. For completeness, the proof of this lemma appears as
Lemma A.1 in the Appendix. Now, observe that Y is symmetrically distributed around 1/2, and therefore,
Pr(Y ≤ 12 − c) = Pr(Y ≥ 21 + c) ≤ β/(8c2 ). This implies that for every γ ≤ 1/2,
Pr(Y ≤ γ) ≤
15
β
.
8( 21 − γ)2
Note that we cannot simply plug this upper bound on the cumulative distribution function into inequality (4).
R 1/2
The fact that Y is symmetrically distributed around 1/2 implies that 0 [Pr(Y ≤ γ)]′ dγ = 1/2, and this
does hold with this bound. To bypass this issue, and maintain the later constrain, we decrease the integration
range. One can easily verify that
#′
Z 1−√β "
2
β
1
dγ = ,
1
2
2
8( 2 − γ)
0
and as a result, we can infer that
Z
1
2
′
[Pr[Y ≤ γ]] γdγ ≥
0
Z
√
1− β
2
0
"
β
1
8( 2 − γ)2
#′
γdγ.
Specifically, this inequality holds since we essentially considered the worst distribution (from an algorithms
analysis point of view) by shifting probability from higher values of Y to smaller values (note that multiplication by γ). The proof of the lemma now follows since
#′
Z 1−√β "
2
β
f (OPT∗ )
γdγ
E[f (b)] ≥
5
8( 12 − γ)2
0
√
∗ Z 1−2 β
β · f (OPT )
γ
=
dγ
1
20
( 2 − γ)3
0
1−√β
2
4γ − 1
β · f (OPT∗ )
=
20
(1 − 2γ)2 0
∗
p 2
f (OPT )
· 1− β
=
.
20
Recall that β = maxi f (ci χi )/f (OPT∗ ). We next consider two cases depending on the value of β. When
β > 1/5, our algorithm executes the classical secretary algorithm with probability 3/8. This algorithm places
a maximal amount of budget on the agent having maximum influence, maxi f (ci χi ), with probability 1/e.
Consequently,
3 β · f (OPT∗ )
3f (OPT∗ )
f (OPT∗ )
E[f (b)] ≥ ·
>
>
.
8
e
40e
15e
When β ≤ 1/5, we know that our algorithm executes the classical secretary algorithm with probability 3/8,
and algorithm LI with probability 5/8. Utilizing Lemma 4.4 results in
p 2
p 2
5
3 βf (OPT∗ ) 5 f (OPT∗ )
3β
1− β
+ ·
· 1− β =
+
E[f (b)] ≥ ·
· f (OPT∗ ).
8
e
8
20
8e
160
One can validate that this latter term is minimized for β = 1/(12/e + 1)2 ≈ 0.034, which implies that
E[f (b)] ≥
f (OPT∗ )
3
f (OPT∗ ) >
.
96 + 8e
15e
This completes the proof of the theorem.
16
References
[1] Noga Alon, Iftah Gamzu, and Moshe Tennenholtz. Optimizing budget allocation among channels and
influencers. In WWW, pages 381–388, 2012.
[2] Moshe Babaioff, Nicole Immorlica, David Kempe, and Robert Kleinberg. A knapsack secretary problem
with applications. In APPROX, pages 16–28, 2007.
[3] Moshe Babaioff, Nicole Immorlica, David Kempe, and Robert Kleinberg. Online auctions and generalized secretary problems. SIGecom Exchanges, 7(2), 2008.
[4] Siddharth Barman, Seeun Umboh, Shuchi Chawla, and David L. Malec. Secretary problems with convex
costs. In ICALP, pages 75–87, 2012.
[5] MohammadHossein Bateni, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, and Morteza Zadimoghaddam. Submodular
secretary problem and extensions. ACM Transactions on Algorithms, 9(4):32, 2013.
[6] Shishir Bharathi, David Kempe, and Mahyar Salek. Competitive influence maximization in social networks. In WINE, pages 306–311, 2007.
[7] Christian Borgs, Michael Brautbar, Jennifer T. Chayes, and Brendan Lucier. Maximizing social influence
in nearly optimal time. In SODA, pages 946–957, 2014.
[8] Ning Chen. On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 23(3),
2009.
[9] Wei Chen, Chi Wang, and Yajun Wang. Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing
in large-scale social networks. In KDD, pages 1029–1038, 2010.
[10] Wei Chen, Yajun Wang, and Siyu Yang. Efficient influence maximization in social networks. In KDD,
pages 199–208, 2009.
[11] Edith Cohen, Daniel Delling, Thomas Pajor, and Renato F. Werneck. Sketch-based influence maximization and computation: Scaling up with guarantees. In CIKM, pages 629–638, 2014.
[12] Erik D. Demaine, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Hamid Mahini, David L. Malec, S. Raghavan, Anshul
Sawant, and Morteza Zadimoghaddam. How to influence people with partial incentives. In WWW, pages
937–948, 2014.
[13] Pedro Domingos and Matthew Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In KDD, pages
57–66, 2001.
[14] E. B. Dynkin. The optimum choice of the instant for stopping a markov process. Sov. Math. Dokl.,
4:627–629, 1963.
[15] Milad Eftekhar, Yashar Ganjali, and Nick Koudas. Information cascade at group scale. In KDD, pages
401–409, 2013.
[16] Uriel Feige. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. In J. ACM, pages 634–652, 1998.
[17] Moran Feldman, Joseph Naor, and Roy Schwartz. Improved competitive ratios for submodular secretary
problems. In APPROX, pages 218–229, 2011.
17
[18] Jacob Goldenberg, Barak Libai, and Eitan Muller. Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the
underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 2001.
[19] Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez, Jure Leskovec, and Andreas Krause. Inferring networks of diffusion and
influence. TKDD, 5(4):21, 2012.
[20] Amit Goyal, Francesco Bonchi, and Laks V. S. Lakshmanan. Learning influence probabilities in social
networks. In WSDM, pages 241–250, 2010.
[21] Sanjeev Goyal and Michael Kearns. Competitive contagion in networks. In STOC, pages 759–774,
2012.
[22] M. Granovetter. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol., 83(6):1420–1443, 1978.
[23] Anupam Gupta, Aaron Roth, Grant Schoenebeck, and Kunal Talwar. Constrained non-monotone submodular maximization: Offline and secretary algorithms. In WINE, pages 246–257, 2010.
[24] Jason D. Hartline, Vahab S. Mirrokni, and Mukund Sundararajan. Optimal marketing strategies over
social networks. In WWW, pages 189–198, 2008.
[25] Xinran He and David Kempe. Price of anarchy for the n-player competitive cascade game with submodular activation functions. In WINE, pages 232–248, 2013.
[26] David Kempe, Jon M. Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social
network. In KDD, pages 137–146, 2003.
[27] David Kempe, Jon M. Kleinberg, and Éva Tardos. Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social
networks. In ICALP, pages 1127–1138, 2005.
[28] Sanjeev Khanna and Brendan Lucier. Influence maximization in undirected networks. In SODA, pages
1482–1496, 2014.
[29] Jon Kleinberg. Cascading behavior in networks: Algorithmic and economic issues. Algorithmic Game
Theory, 2007.
[30] Robert D. Kleinberg. A multiple-choice secretary algorithm with applications to online auctions. In
SODA, pages 630–631, 2005.
[31] Siyu Lei, Silviu Maniu, Luyi Mo, Reynold Cheng, and Pierre Senellart. Online influence maximization.
In SIGKDD, pages 645–654, 2015.
[32] Takanori Maehara, Akihiro Yabe, and Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi. Budget allocation problem with multiple
advertisers: A game theoretic view. In ICML, pages 428–437, 2015.
[33] Michael Mathioudakis, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Aristides Gionis, and Antti Ukkonen. Sparsification of influence networks. In KDD, pages 529–537, 2011.
[34] Elchanan Mossel and Sebastien Roch. On the submodularity of influence in social networks. In STOC,
pages 128–134, 2007.
[35] John F. Nash. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 36:48–49, 1950.
18
[36] Matthew Richardson and Pedro Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In
KDD, pages 61–70, 2002.
[37] Lior Seeman and Yaron Singer. Adaptive seeding in social networks. In FOCS, pages 459–468, 2013.
[38] Hsu-Shih Shih and E. Stanley Lee. Discrete Multi-Level Programming in a Dynamic Environment, pages
79–98. Physica-Verlag HD, 2001.
[39] Yaron Singer. How to win friends and influence people, truthfully: influence maximization mechanisms
for social networks. In WSDM, pages 733–742, 2012.
[40] Tasuku Soma, Naonori Kakimura, Kazuhiro Inaba, and Ken-ichi Kawarabayashi. Optimal budget allocation: Theoretical guarantee and efficient algorithm. In ICML, pages 351–359, 2014.
[41] Maxim Sviridenko. A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint.
Oper. Res. Lett., 32(1):41–43, 2004.
[42] Adrian Vetta. Nash equilibria in competitive societies, with applications to facility location, traffic
routing and auctions. In FOCS, pages 416–425, 2002.
[43] Yu Yang, Xiangbo Mao, Jian Pei, and Xiaofei He. Continuous influence maximization: What discounts
should we offer to social network users? In SIGMOD, pages 727–741, 2016.
A
Additional details
The following claim was established by [17, Lem B.5]. We include it here for completeness.
P
Lemma A.1. Consider the random variable Y = i wi Xi /f (OPT∗ ), defined in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
Its variance is Var[Y ] ≤ β/4.
Proof.
P 2
P 2
P
w
V ar[ i wi Xi ]
i wi V ar[Xi ]
=
= 2 i i ∗
V ar[Y ] =
∗
∗
2
2
f (OPT )
f (OPT )
4f (OPT )
P
maxi wi · i wi
maxi wi · f (OPT∗ )
β
=
≤ .
≤
∗
∗
2
2
4f (OPT )
4f (OPT )
4
19
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:1403.6920v3 [math.AC] 10 Apr 2014
GRÖBNER BASES OF BALANCED POLYOMINOES
JÜRGEN HERZOG, AYESHA ASLOOB QURESHI AND AKIHIRO SHIKAMA
Abstract. We introduce balanced polyominoes and show that their ideal of inner
minors is a prime ideal and has a squarefree Gröbner basis with respect to any
monomial order, and we show that any row or column convex and any tree-like
polyomino is simple and balanced.
Introduction
Polyominoes are, roughly speaking, plane figures obtained by joining squares of
equal size edge to edge. Their appearance origins in recreational mathematics but
also has been subject of many combinatorial investigations including tiling problems.
A connection of polyominoes to commutative algebra has first been established by
the second author of this paper by assigning to each polyomino its ideal of inner
minors, see [14]. This class of ideals widely generalizes the ideal of 2-minors of
a matrix of indeterminates, and even that of the ideal of 2-minors of two-sided
ladders. It also includes the meet-join ideal of plane distributive lattices. Those
classical ideals have been extensively studied in the literature, see for example [2],
[3] and [7]. Typically one determines for such ideals their Gröbner bases, determines
their resolution and computes their regularity, checks whether the rings defined by
them are normal, Cohen-Macaulay or Gorenstein. A first step in this direction for
the inner minors of a polyomino (also called polyomino ideals) has been done by
Qureshi in the afore mentioned paper. Very recently those convex polyominoes have
been classified in [5] whose ideal of inner minors is linearly related or has a linear
resolution. For some special polyominoes also the regularity of the ideal of inner
minors is known, see [8].
In this paper, for balanced polyominoes, we provide some positive answers to the
questions addressed before. To define a balanced polyomino, one labels the vertices
of a polyomino by integer numbers in a way that row and column sums are zero
along intervals that belong to the polyomino. Such a labeling is called admissible.
There is a natural way to attach to each admissible labeling of a polyomino P a
binomial. The given polyomino is called balanced if all the binomials arising from
admissible labelings belong to the ideal of inner minors IP of P. It turns out that
P is balanced if and only if IP coincides with the lattice ideal determined by P,
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13C05, 05E40, 13P10.
Key words and phrases. polyominoes, Gröbner bases, lattice ideals.
This paper was partially written during the visit of the second and third author at Universität
Duisburg-Essen, Campus Essen. The second author wants to thank the Abdus Salam International
Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy for supporting her. The third author wants
to thank Professor Hibi who made his visit to Essen possible.
1
see Proposition 1.2. This is the main observation of Section 1 where we provide
the basic definitions regarding polyominoes and their ideals of inner minors. An
important consequence of Proposition 1.2 is the result stated in Corollary 1.3 which
asserts that for any balanced polyomino P, the ideal IP is a prime ideal and that
its height coincides with the number of cells of P. It is conjectured in [14] by the
second author of this paper that IP is a prime ideal for any simple polyomino P. A
polyomino is called simple if it has no ‘holes’, see Section 1 for the precise definition.
We expect that simple polyominoes are balanced. This would then imply Qureshi’s
conjecture.
In Section 2 we identify the primitive binomials of a balanced polyomino (Theorem 2.1) and deduce from this that for a balanced polyomino P the ideal IP has
a squarefree initial ideal for any monomial order. This then implies, as shown in
Corollary 2.3, that the residue class ring of IP is a normal Cohen-Macaulay domain.
Finally, in Section 3 we show that all row or column convex, and all tree-like polyminoes are simple and balanced. This supports our conjecture that simple polyominoes
are balanced.
1. The ideal of inner minors of a polyomino
In this section we introduce polyominoes and their ideals of inner minors. Given
a = (i, j) and b = (k, l) in N2 we write a ≤ b if i ≤ k and j ≤ l. The set
[a, b] = {c ∈ N2 : a ≤ c ≤ b} is called an interval, and an interval of the from
C = [a, a + (1, 1)] is called a cell (with left lower corner a). The elements of C are
called the vertices of C, and the sets {a, a+(1, 0)}, {a, a+(0, 1)}, {a+(1, 0), a+(1, 1)}
and {a + (0, 1), a + (1, 1)} the edges of C.
Let P be a finite collection of cells of N2 , and let C and D be two cells of P. Then
C and D are said to be connected, if there is a sequence of cells C = C1 , . . . , Cm = D
of P such that Ci ∩ Ci+1 is an edge of Ci for i = 1, . . . , m − 1. If in addition, Ci 6= Cj
for all i 6= j, then C is called a path (connecting C and D). The collection of cells P
is called a polyomino if any two cells of P are connected, see Figure 1.
Figure 1. A polyomino
Let P be a polyomino, and let K be a field. We denote by S the polynomial over
K with variables xij with (i, j) ∈ V (P). Following [14] a 2-minor xij xkl − xil xkj ∈ S
is called an inner minor of P if all the cells [(r, s), (r + 1, s + 1)] with i ≤ r ≤ k − 1
and j ≤ s ≤ l − 1 belong to P. In that case the interval [(i, j), (k, l)] is called an
2
inner interval of P. The ideal IP ⊂ S generated by all inner minors of P is called
the polyomino ideal of P. We also set K[P] = S/IP .
Let P be a polyomino. An interval [a, b] with a = (i, j) and b = (k, l) is called a
horizontal edge interval of P if j = l and the sets {r, r + 1} for r = i, . . . , k − 1 are
edges of cells of P. Similarly one defines vertical edge intervals of P. According to
[14], an integer value function α : V (P) → Z is called admissible, if for all maximal
horizontal or vertical edge intervals I of P one has
X
α(a) = 0.
a∈I
−3
−1
−2
5
−2
2
−2
0
1
−4
4
0
3
0
0
−2
−1
0
3
−1
2
−2
Figure 2. An admissible labeling
In Figure 2 an admissible labeling of the polyomino displayed Figure 1 is shown.
Given an admissible labeling α we define the binomial
fα =
Y
xaα(a) −
a∈V (P)
α(a)>0
Y
xa−α(a) ,
a∈V (P)
α(a)<0
Let JP be the ideal generated by the binomials fα where α is an admissible labeling
of P. It is obvious that IP ⊂ JP . We call a polyomino balanced if for any admissible
labeling α, the binomial fα ∈ IP . This is the case if and only if IP = JP .
L
Consider the free abelian group G = (i,j)∈V (P) Zeij with basis elements eij . To
any cell C = [(i, j), (i + 1, j + 1)] of P we attach the element bC = eij + ei+1,j+1 −
ei+1,j − ei,j+1 in G and let Λ ⊂ G be the lattice spanned by these elements.
Lemma 1.1. The elements bC form a K-basis of Λ and hence rankZ Λ = |P|.
Moreover, Λ is saturated. In other words, G/Λ is torsionfree.
Proof. We order the basis elements eij lexicographically. Then the lead term of bC
is eij . This shows that the elements bC are linearly independent and hence form a
Z-basis of Λ. We may complete this basis of Λ by the elements eij for which (i, j) is
not a left lower corner of a cell of P to obtain a basis of G. This shows that G/Λ is
free, and hence torsionfree.
The lattice ideal IΛ attached to the lattice Λ is the ideal generated by all binomials
fv =
Y
xvaa −
Y
a∈V (P)
va <0
a∈V (P)
va >0
with v ∈ Λ.
3
xa−va
Proposition 1.2. Let P be a balanced polyomino. Then IP = IΛ .
Proof. The assertion follows once we have shown that for any v ∈ Λ there exists
an admissible labeling α of P such that va = α(a) for all a ∈ V (P). Indeed, since
the elements bC ∈ Λ form a Z-basis of Λ, there exist integers zC ∈ Z such that
P
P
v = C zC bC . We set α = C∈P zC αC where for C = [(i, j), (i + 1, j + 1)],
αC ((k, l)) =
1,
if (k, l) = (i, j) or (k, l) = (i + 1, j + 1),
−1, if (k, l) = (i + 1, j) or (k, l) = (i, j + 1),
0,
otherwise.
Then α(a) = va for all a ∈ V (P). Since each αC is an admissible labeling of P and
since any linear combination of admissible labelings is again an admissible labeling,
the desired result follows.
Corollary 1.3. If P is a balanced polyomino, then IP is a prime ideal of height |P|.
Proof. By Proposition 1.2, IP = IΛ and by Lemma 1.1, Λ is saturated. It follows
that IP is a prime ideal, see [9, Theorem 7.4]. Next if follows from [12, Corollary
2.2] (or [9, Proposition 7.5]) that height IP = rankZ Λ. Hence the desired conclusion
follows from Lemma 1.1.
Let P be a polyomino and let [a, b] an interval with the property that P ⊂ [a, b].
According to [14], a polyomino P is called simple, if for any cell C not belonging to
P there exists a path C = C1 , C2 , . . . , Cm = D with Ci 6∈ P for i = 1, . . . , m and
such that D is not a cell of [a, b]. It is conjectured in [14] that IP is a prime ideal if
P is simple. There exist examples of polyominoes for which IP is a prime ideal but
which are not simple. Such an example is shown in Figure 3. On the other hand,
we conjecture that a polyomino is simple if and only it is balanced. This conjecture
implies Qureshi’s conjecture on simple polyominoes.
Figure 3. Not simple but prime
2. Primitive binomials of balanced polyominoes
The purpose of this section is to identify for any balanced polyomino P the primitive binomials in IP . This will allow us to show that the initial ideal of IP is a
squarefree monomial ideal for any monomial order.
The primitive binomials in P are determined by cycles. A sequence of vertices
C = a1 , a2 , . . . , am in V (P) with am = a1 and such that ai 6= aj for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤
m − 1 is a called a cycle in P if the following conditions hold:
(i) [ai , ai+1 ] is a horizonal or vertical edge interval of P for all i = 1, . . . , m − 1;
4
(ii) for i = 1, . . . , m one has: if [ai , ai+1 ] is a horizonal interval of P, then
[ai+1 , ai+2 ] is a vertical edge interval of P and vice versa. Here, am+1 = a2 .
a1
a2
a5
a9
a7
a8
a3
a1
a2
a4
a3
a4
Figure 4. A cycle and a non-cycle in P
It follows immediately from the definition of a cycle that m − 1 is even. Given a
cycle C, we attach to C the binomial
(m−1)/2
fC =
Y
(m−1)/2
xa2i−1 −
i=1
Y
xa2i
i=1
Theorem 2.1. Let P be a balanced polyomino.
(a) Let C be a cycle in P. Then fC ∈ IP .
(b) Let f ∈ IP be a primitive binomial. Then there exists a cycle C in P such that
each maximal interval of P contains at most two vertices of C and f = ±fC .
Proof. (a) Let C = a1 , a2 , . . . , am be the cycle in P. We define the labeling α of P by
setting α(a) = 0 if a 6∈ C and α(ai ) = (−1)i+1 for i = 1, . . . , m, and claim that α is an
admissible labeling of P. To see this we consider a maximal horizontal edge interval
I of P. If I ∩ C = ∅, then α(a) = 0 for all a ∈ I. On the other hand, if I ∩ C =
6 ∅,
then there exist integers i such that ai , ai+1 ∈ I (where ai+1 = a1 if i = m − 1), and
P
no
other
vertex
of
I
belongs
C.
It
follows
that
a∈I α(a) = 0. Similarly, we see that
P
a∈I α(a) = 0 for any vertical edge interval. It follows form the definition of α that
fC = fα , and hence since P is balanced it follows that fC ∈ IP .
(b) Let f ∈ IP be a primitive binomial. Since P is balanced and f is irreducible,
[14, Theorem 3.8(a)] implies that there exists an admissible labeling α of P such
that
Y
Y
f = fα =
xaα(a) −
xa−α(a) .
a∈V (P)
α(a)>0
a∈V (P)
α(a)<0
Choose a1 ∈ V (P) such that α(a1 ) > 0. Let I1 be the maximal horizontal edge interval with a1 ∈ I1 . Since α is admissible, there exists some a2 ∈ I1 with α(a2 ) < 0.
Let I2 be the maximal vertical edge interval containing a2 . Then similarly as before,
there exists a3 ∈ I2 with α(a3 ) > 0. In the next step we consider the maximal horizontal edge interval containing and a3 and proceed as before. Continuing in this way
we obtain a sequence a1 , a2 , a3 . . . . , of vertices of P such that α(a1 ), α(a2 ), α(a3 ), . . .
is a sequence with alternating signs. Since V (P) is a finite set, there exist a number
m such that ai 6= aj for all 1 ≤ i < j ≤ m and am = ai for some i < m. If
follows that α(am ) = α(ai ) which implies that m − i is even. Then the sequence
C = ai , ai+1 , . . . am is a cycle in P, and hence by (a), fC ∈ IP .
For any binomial g = u − v we set g (+) = u and g (−) = v. Now if i is odd, then
(+)
(−)
(+)
fC divides f (+) and fC divides f (−) , while if i is even, then fC divides f (−) and
(−)
fC divides f (+) . Since f is primitive, this implies that f = ±fC , as desired.
5
Corollary 2.2. Let P be a balanced polyomino. Then IP admits a squarefree initial
ideal for any monomial order.
Proof. By Corollary 1.3, IP is a prime ideal, since P is a balanced polyomino. This
implies that IP is a toric ideal, see for example [4, Theorem 5.5]. Now we use the
fact (see [10, Lemma 4.6] or [6, Corollary 10.1.5]) that the primitive binomials of
a toric ideal form a universal Gröbner basis. Since by Theorem 2.1, the primitive
binomials of IP have squarefree initial terms for any monomial order, the desired
conclusion follows.
Corollary 2.3. Let P be a balanced polyomino. Then K[P] is a normal CohenMacaulay domain of dimension |V (P)| − |P|.
Proof. A toric ring whose toric ideal admits a squarefree initial ideal is normal by
theorem of Sturmfels [10, Chapter 8], and by a theorem of Hochster ([1, Theorem
6.3.5]) a normal toric ring is Cohen–Macaulay. Since P is balanced, we know from
L
Proposition 1.2 that IP = IΛ where Λ is the lattice in (i,j)∈V (P) Zeij spanned by
the elements bC = eij + ei+1,j+1 − ei+1,j − ei,j+1 where C = [(i, j), (i + 1, j + 1)] is a
cell of P. By [9, Proposition 7.5], the height of IΛ is equal to the rank of Λ. Thus
we see that height IP = |P|. It follows that the Krull dimension of K[P] is equal to
|V (P)| − |P|, as desired.
3. Classes of balanced polyominoes
In this section we consider two classes of balanced polyominoes. As mentioned
in Section 1 one expects that any simple polyomino is balanced. In this generality
we do not yet have a proof of this statement. Here we want to consider only two
special classes of polyominoes which are simple and balanced, namely the row and
column convex polyominoes, and the tree-like polyominoes.
Let P be a polyomino. Let C = [(i, j), (i + 1, j + 1)] be a cell of P. We call
the vertex a = (i, j) the left lower corner of C. Let C1 and C2 be two cells with
left lower corners (i1 , j1 ) and (i2 , j2 ), respectively. We say that C1 and C2 are in
horizontal (vertical) position if j1 = j2 (i1 = i2 ). The polyomino P is called row
convex if for any two horizontal cells C1 and C2 with lower left corners (i1 , j) and
(i2 , j) and i1 < i2 , all cells with lower left corner (i, j) with i1 ≤ i ≤ i2 belong to
P. Similarly one defines column convex polyominoes. For example, the polyomino
displayed in Figure 5 is column convex but not row convex.
Figure 5. Column convex but not row convex
A neighbor of a cell C in P is a cell D which shares a common edge with C.
Obviously, any cell can have at most four neighbors. We call a cell of P a leaf, if
6
it has an edge which does not has a common vertex with any other cell. Figure 6
illustrates this concept.
Figure 6. A polyomino with three leaves
The polyomino P is called tree-like each subpolyomino of P has a leaf. The
polyomino displayed in Figure 6 is not tree-like, because it contains a subpolyomino
which has no leaf. On the other hand, Figure 7 shows a tree-like polyomino.
Figure 7. A tree-like polyomino
A free vertex of P is a vertex which belongs to exactly one cell. Notice that any
leaf has two free vertices.
We call a path of cells a horizontal (vertical) cell interval, if the left lower corners
of the path form a horizontal (vertical) edge interval. Let C be a leaf, and let I
by the maximal cell interval to which C belongs, and assume that I is a horizontal
(vertical) cell interval. Then we call C a good leaf, if for one of the free vertices of
C the maximal horizontal (vertical) edge interval which contains it has the same
length as I. We call a leaf bad if it is not good, see Figure 8.
Theorem 3.1. Let P be a row or column convex, or a tree-like polyomino. Then P
is balanced and simple.
good
bad
good
Figure 8. Bad and good leaves
7
Proof. Let P be a tree-like polyomino. We first show that P is balanced. Let α be
an admissible labeling of P. We have to show that fα ∈ IP . To prove this we first
show that P has a good leaf.
If |P| = 1, then the assertion is trivial. We may assume that |P| ≥ 2. Let
ni = |{C ∈ P : deg C = i}|.
Observe that C∈P deg C = n1 + 2n2 + 3n3 + 4n4 , where deg C denotes the number
of neighbor cells of P.
Let P be any polyomino with cells C1 , . . . , Cn . Associated to P, is the so-called
connection graph on vertex [n] with the edge set {{i, j} : E(Ci ) ∩ E(Cj ) 6= ∅}.
It is easy to see that connection graph of a tree-like polyomino is a tree. Therefore,
using some elementary facts from graph theory, we obtain that
P
n1 + 2n2 + 3n3 + 4n4 = 2(|P| − 1) = 2(n1 + n2 + n3 + n4 − 1).
This implies that n1 = n3 + 2n4 + 2. Let g(P) be the number of good leaves in
P and b(P) be the number of bad leaves in P. It is obvious that n1 = g(P) + b(P).
Then we have
(1)
g(P) = n3 + 2n4 + 2 − b(P).
Next, we show that b(P) ≤ n3 . Suppose that C is a bad leaf in P and I the unique
maximal cell interval to which C belongs. Let DC be the end cell of the interval
I. Observe that C 6= DC . We claim that deg DC = 3. Indeed, since C is bad, the
length of the maximal intervals containing the two free vertices of C is bigger than
the length of the interval I. See Figure 9 where the cells belonging to I are marked
with dots and E is the cell next to DC which does not belong to P. Since E ∈
/ P,
the cells D1 and D2 belong to P. Suppose D3 6∈ P. Since P is a polyomino there
exists a path C connecting D1 and DC . Since E, D3 6∈ P the path C (which is a
subpolyomino of P) does not have a leaf, contradicting the assumption that P is
tree-like. Therefore, D3 ∈ P. Similarly one shows that D4 ∈ P. This shows that
deg DC = 3.
D3 D1
E
D4 D2
Figure 9.
Moreover, DC cannot be the end cell of any other cell interval, because D3 and
D4 are neighbors of DC . Thus we obtain a one-to-one correspondence between the
bad leafs C and the cells DC as defined before. It follows that n3 ≤ b(P). Therefore,
by (1) we obtain
g(P) = n3 + 2n4 + 2 − b(P) ≥ 2n4 + 2 ≥ 2.
8
Thus, we have at least 2 good end cell for every tree-like polyomino.
Now we show P is balanced. Indeed, let α be an admissible labeling of P. We
want to show that fα ∈ IP . Let C be a good leaf of P with free vertices a1 and
a2 . Then α(a1 ) = −α(a2 ). If α(ai ) = 0 for i = 1, 2, then α restricted to P ′ is an
admissible labeling of P ′ , where P ′ is obtained from P by removing the cell C from
P. Inducting on the number of cells we may then assume that fα ∈ IP ′ . Since
IP ′ ⊂ IP , we are done is this case.
Assume now that α(a1 ) 6= 0. We proceed by induction on |α(a1)|. Note that
α(a2 ) 6= 0, too. Since C is a good leaf, we may assume that the maximal interval
[a2 , b] to which a2 belongs has the same length as the cell interval [C, DC ] and
α(a1 ) > 0. Then α(a2 ) < 0 and hence, since α is admissible, there exists a c ∈ [a2 , b]
with α(c) > 0. The cells of the interval [c, a1 ] all belong to [C, DC ]. Therefore,
g = xc xa1 − xd xa2 ∈ IP . Here d is the vertex as indicated in Figure 10.
a2
c
b
DC
C
d
a1
Figure 10.
Notice that the labeling β of P defined by
β1 (e) =
α(e) − 1, if e = a1 or e = c,
α(e) + 1, if e = a2 or e = d,
α(e),
elsewhere.
is admissible and |β(a1 )| < |α(a1 )|. By induction hypothesis we have that fβ ∈ IP .
Then the following relation
(2)
fα − (fα(+) /xc xa1 )g = (xa2 xd )fβ
gives that fα ∈ IP , as well.
Next, we show that P is simple by applying induction on number of cells. The
assertion is trivial if P consists of only one cell. Suppose now |P| > 1, and let D be
a cell not belonging to P and I an interval such V (P) ⊂ I.
Since P is tree-like, P admits a leaf cell C. Let P ′ be the polyomino which is
obtained from P by removing the cell C. Then P ′ is again tree-like and hence
is simple by induction. Therefore, since D 6∈ P ′ , there exists a path D ′ : D =
D1 , D2 , · · · , Dm of cells with Di 6∈ P ′ for all i and such that Dm is a border cell of
I. We let D = D ′ , if Di 6= C for all i. Note that C 6= D1 , Dm . Suppose Di = C for
some i with 1 < i < m. Since C a leaf, it follows that the cells C1 , C2 , C3 , C4 and
C5 as shown in Figure 11 do not belong to P.
Since Di = C and since D ′ is a path of cells it follows that Di−1 ∈ {C1 , C3 , C5 }
and Di+1 ∈ {C1 , C3 , C5 }. If Di−1 = C1 and Di+1 = C3 , then we let
D : D1 , . . . , Di−1 , C2 , Di+1 , . . . , Dm ,
9
C1 C2
C
C3
C5 C4
Figure 11.
and if Di−1 = C1 and Di+1 = C5 , then we let
D : D1 , . . . , Di−1 , C2 , C3 , C4 , Di+1 , . . . , Dm .
Similarly one defines D in all the other cases that my occur for Di−1 and Di+1 , so
that in any case D ′ can be replaced by the path of cells D which does not contain
any cell of P c and connects D with the border of I. This shows that P is simple.
Now we show that if P is row or column convex then P is balanced and simple.
We may assume that P be column convex. We first show that P is balanced. For
this part of the proof we follow the arguments given in [14, Proof of Theorem 3.10].
Let C1 = [C1 , Cn ] be the left most column interval of P and a be lower left corner
of C1 . Let α be an admissible labeling for P. If α(a) = 0, then α restricted to P ′ is
an admissible labeling of P ′ , where P ′ is obtained from P by removing the cell C1
from P. By applying induction on the number of cells we have that fα ∈ IP ′ ⊂ IP ,
and we are done is this case.
Now we may assume that α(a) 6= 0. We may assume that α(a) > 0. By following
the same arguments as in case of tree-like polyominoes, it suffice to show that there
exist an inner interval [(i, j), (k, l)] with i < k and j < l such that α((i, j))α((k, l)) >
0 or α((k, j))α((i, l)) > 0.
Let [a, b] and [a, c] be the maximal horizontal and vertical edge intervals of P
containing a. Then there exist e ∈ [a, b] and f ∈ [a, c] such that α(e), α(f ) < 0
because α is admissible. Let [f, g] be the maximal horizontal edge interval of P
which contains f . Then there exists a vertex h ∈ [f, g] such that α(h) > 0. If
size([f, g]) ≤ size([a, b]), then column convexity of P gives that [a, h] is an inner
interval of P and α(a)α(h) > 0. Otherwise, if size([f, g]) ≥ size([a, b]), then again
by using column convexity of P, xa xq − xe xf ∈ IP where q is as shown in following
figure. By following the same arguments as in case of tree-like polyominoes, we
conclude that fα ∈ IP .
Now we will show that P is simple. We may assume that V (P) ⊂ [(k, l), (r, s)]
with l > 0. Let C 6∈ P be a cell with with lower left corner a = (i, j), and consider
the infinite path C of cells where C = C0 , C1 , . . . and where the lower left corner of
Ck is (i, k) for k = 0, 1, . . .. If C ∩ P = ∅, then C is connected to C0 . On the other
hand, if C ∩ P =
6 ∅, then, since P is column convex, there exist integers k1 , k2 with
l ≤ k1 ≤ k2 ≤ s such that Ck ∈ P if and only if k1 ≤ k ≤ k2 . Since C 6∈ P it follows
that j < k1 or j > k2 . In the first case, C is connected to C0 and in the second case
C is connected to Cs .
10
Corollary 3.2. Let P be a row or column convex, or a tree-like polyomino. Then
K[P] is a normal Cohen–Macaulay domain.
References
[1] W. Bruns, J. Herzog, Cohen–Macaulay rings, Cambridge University Press, London, Cambridge,
New York, (1993)
[2] W. Bruns, U. Vetter, Determinantal rings, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, (1988)
[3] A. Conca, Ladder determinantal rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 98, 119–134 (1995)
[4] V. Ene, J. Herzog, Gröbner bases in Commutative Algebra, Graduate Studies in Mathematics
130, American Mathematical Society, (2011).
[5] V. Ene, J. Herzog, T. Hibi, Linearly related polyominoes, arXiv:1403.4349 [math.AC]
[6] J. Herzog, T. Hibi, Monomial ideals, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 260, Springer, (2010)
[7] J. Herzog, N.V. Trung, Gröbner bases and multiplicity of determinantal and Pfaffian ideals,
Advances in Math. 96 (1992), 1-37
[8] V. Ene, A. A. Qureshi, A. Rauf, Regularity of join-meet ideals of distributive lattices, Electron
J. Combin. 20 (3) (2013), #P20.
[9] E. Miller, B. Sturmfels, Combinatorial Commutative Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathematics
260, Springer (2005)
[10] B. Sturmfels, Gröbner Bases and Convex Polytopes, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (1995)
[11] J. Shapiro, S. Hoşten, Primary decomposition of lattice basis ideals. J.Symbolic Computation
29, 625–639 (2000)
[12] B. Sturmfels, D. Eisenbud, Binomial ideals, Duke Math. J. 84 , 1–45 (1996)
[13] R. Villarreal, Monomial Algebras. Marcel Dekker
[14] A. A. Qureshi, Ideals generated by 2-minors, collections of cells and stack polyominoes, Journal
of Algebra, 357, 279– 303, (2012).
Jürgen Herzog, Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Campus
Essen, 45117 Essen, Germany
E-mail address: [email protected]
Ayesha Asloob Qureshi, The Abdus Salam International Center of Theoretical
Physics, Trieste, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
Akihiro Shikama, Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Graduate School
of Information Science and Technology, Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 5600043, Japan
E-mail address: [email protected]
11
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1802.02568v1 [cs.CV] 7 Feb 2018
V I S E R: Visual Self-Regularization
Hamid Izadinia∗
University of Washington
Pierre Garrigues
Flickr, Yahoo Research
[email protected]
[email protected]
Abstract
problem. However, image recognition remains an area of
active research. ImageNet is indeed biased towards single
objects appearing in the middle of the image, which is in
contrast with the photos we take with our mobile phones that
typically contain a range of objects that appear in context.
Also, the list of object categories in ImageNet is a subset of
the lexical database WordNet [29]. This makes ImageNet
biased towards certain categories such as breeds of dogs, and
does not match the scope of more general image recognition
tasks such as object detection and localization in context.
In this work, we propose the use of large set of unlabeled
images as a source of regularization data for learning robust visual representation. Given a visual model trained by
a labeled dataset in a supervised fashion, we augment our
training samples by incorporating large number of unlabeled
data and train a semi-supervised model. We demonstrate that
our proposed learning approach leverages an abundance
of unlabeled images and boosts the visual recognition performance which alleviates the need to rely on large labeled
datasets for learning robust representation. To increment
the number of image instances needed to learn robust visual
models in our approach, each labeled image propagates
its label to its nearest unlabeled image instances. These
retrieved unlabeled images serve as local perturbations of
each labeled image to perform Visual Self-Regularization
(V I S E R). To retrieve such visual self regularizers, we compute the cosine similarity in a semantic space defined by the
penultimate layer in a fully convolutional neural network.
We use the publicly available Yahoo Flickr Creative Commons 100M dataset as the source of our unlabeled image
set and propose a distributed approximate nearest neighbor
algorithm to make retrieval practical at that scale. Using
the labeled instances and their regularizer samples we show
that we significantly improve object categorization and localization performance on the MS COCO and Visual Genome
datasets where objects appear in context.
Datasets such as MS COCO [25] or Visual Genome [21]
have been constructed such that photos are typically composed of multiple objects appearing at a variety of positions
and scales. They provide a more realistic benchmark for
image recognition systems that are intended for consumer
photography products such as Flickr or Google Photos. MS
COCO currently contains 300K images and 80 object categories, whereas Visual Genome contains 100K images and
thousands of object categories. CNNs are also showing the
best performance on these datasets [34, 21]. As training
deep neural networks requires a large amount of data and
the size of MS COCO and Visual Genome is an order of
magnitude smaller than ImageNet, the CNN weights are
initialized using the weights of a model that was originally
trained on ImageNet. In this paper we focus on improving
image recognition performance on MS COCO and Visual
Genome.
The labels in MS COCO and Visual Genome are obtained
via crowdsourcing platforms such as Amazon Mechanical
Turk. Hence it is time-consuming and expensive to obtain
additional labels. However, we have access to huge quantities of unlabeled or weakly labeled images. For example, the
Yahoo Flickr Creative Commons 100M dataset (YFCC) [40]
is comprised of a hundred million Flickr photos with userprovided annotations such as photo tags, titles, or descriptions.
1. Introduction
Image recognition has rapidly progressed in the last five
years. It was shown in the ground-breaking work of [22] that
deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are extremely
effective at recognizing objects and images. The development of deeper neural networks with over a hundred layers
has kept improving performance on the ImageNet dataset [7],
and we have arguably achieved human performance on this
task [35]. These developments have become mainstream and
may lead to the perception of image recognition as a solved
In this paper, we present a simple yet effective semisupervised learning algorithm that is able to leverage labeled
and unlabeled data to improve classification accuracy on
the MS COCO and Visual Genome datasets. We first train
a fully convolutional network using the multi-labeled data
∗ Work was done while the author was an intern at Flickr, Yahoo Research.
1
Figure 1. The t-SNE [27] map of the whole set of images (including MS COCO and YFCC images) labeled as ‘Bus’ category after applying
our proposed V I S E R approach. Can you guess whether green or blue background correspond to the human annotated images of MS COCO
dataset?
Answer key: blue: MS COCO, green: YFCC
(e.g. MS COCO or Visual Genome). Then, we retrieve for
each training sample the nearest samples in YFCC using
the cosine similarity in a semantic space of the penultimate
layer in the trained fully convolutional network. We call
these Regularizer samples which can be considered as real
perturbed samples compared to the Gaussian noise perturbation considered in virtual adversarial training [31]. Having
access to a large set of unlabeled data is critical for finding
representative regularizer samples for each training instance.
For making this approach practical at scale, we propose an
approximate distributed algorithm to find the images with
semantically similar attention activation. We then fine-tune
the network using the labeled instances and Regularizer samples. Our experimental results show that we significantly
improve performance over previous methods where models
are trained using only the labeled data. We also demonstrate
how our approach is applicable to object-in-context retrieval.
2. Related work
The recognition and detection of objects that appear “in
context” is an active area of research. The most common
benchmarks for this task are the PASCAL VOC [10] and MS
COCO datasets. Deep convolutional neural networks have
been shown to provide optimal performance in this setting
with state-of-the-art performance results for object detection
in [34]. It has recently been shown in [33, 38, 9, 3, 42]
that it is possible to accurately classify and localize objects
using training data that does not contain any object bounding
box information. We refer to this training data that does
not contain the location information of the object as weaklysupervised.
The size of labeled "objects in context" datasets is typically small. For example, MS COCO has around 300,000
images and Visual Genome has over 100,000 images. However, we have access to large amounts of unlabeled web
images. The Yahoo Flickr Creative Commons 100M dataset
has one hundred million images that have user annotations
such as tags, titles, and description. There has been some
recent efforts to leverage this user annotation to build object classifiers. For instance, [18] proposes a noise model
that is able to better capture the uncertainty in the user annotations and improve the classification performance. It is
shown in [19] that it is possible to learn state-of-the-art image features when training a convolutional neural network
from a random initialization using user annotations as target
labels. In [12], the authors also train deep neural networks
from scratch and use the output layers as classifiers directly.
However, classifier performance is lower when training on
noisy data. Contrary to these approaches, we propose a form
of curriculum learning [4] where we first train a model on a
small set of clean data, and then augment the training set by
mining instances from a large set of unlabeled images.
While it is shown that by making small perturbations to
the input it is possible to make adversarial examples which
can fool machine learning models [39, 23, 24], adversarial examples can be used as a means for data augmentation to improve the regularization capability of the deep
models. Our method is related to adversarial training techniques [13, 31, 30] in the sense that additional training instances with small perturbations are created and added to
the training data. However, in contrast to those methods,
we retrieve real adversarial examples from a large set of
person
person, sports ball, tennis racket
3
sports ball
tennis racket
High
64
128
256
512
Conv(3,3,512)
512
Low
1024
Conv(3,3,512)
2048
N
N
Noisy-Or
Conv(3,3,256)
Conv(3,3,64)
Conv(3,3,128)
Figure 2. We use a Fully Convolutional Network to simultaneously categorize images and localize the objects of interest in a single forward
pass. The last layer of the network produces an tensor of N heatmaps for localizing objects where each corresponds to one of the Nth object.
The green areas correspond to regions with high probability for the object produced by our network.
unlabeled images. Our examples are thus real image instances which possess high correlation to the labeled data
in the semantic space determined by the penultimate layer
of the neural network after the first phase of training. Such
instances usually correspond to large perturbations in the
input space but follow the natural distribution of the data
which is analogous to the adversarial perturbations. We call
our retrieved image instances as Regularizer and show that
the Regularizer instances can be used to re-train the model
and further improve performance.
other modalities. For example, in [8] the performance of
several nearest neighbor methods is examined on the image
captioning task. By conducting extensive experiments, the
results of [8] have shown that nearest neighbor approaches
can perform as good as state-of-the-art methods for image
captioning.
Semi-supervised learning is the class of algorithms where
classifiers are trained using labeled and unlabeled data. A
number of approaches have been proposed in this setting
such as Naive Bayes and EM algorithm [32], ensemble methods [5] and propagating labels based on similarity as in [43].
In our case the size of the unlabeled set is three orders of
magnitude larger than the size of the labeled set. Existing
methods are therefore impractical, and we propose a simple
method to propagate labels using a nearest neighbor search.
The metric is the cosine distance in the space defined by the
penultimate layer of the fully convolutional neural network
after it has been trained on the clean dataset. We argue that
the size of our unlabeled set is critical in order for the label
propagation to work effectively, and we propose approximations using MapReduce to make the search practical [6].
Most recent developments in image recognition have been
driven by optimizing performance on the ImageNet dataset.
However, images in this dataset have a bias for single objects
appearing in the center of the image. In order to increase
performance on photos where multiple objects may appear at
different scales and position, we adopt a fully convolutional
neural network architecture inspired by [26]. Each fully connected layer is replaced with a convolutional layer. Hence,
the output of the network is a H × W × N tensor where the
width and height depend on the input image size and N is
the number of object classes. For each object class the corresponding heatmap provides information about the object’s
location as illustrated in Figure 2. In our experiments we use
the base architecture of VGG16 [36] shown in Figure 2.
Large-scale nearest neighbor search is commonly used
in the computer vision community for a variety of tasks
such as scene completion [16], image editing with the PatchMatch algorithm [2], or image annotation with the TagProp
algorithm [15]. Techniques such as TagProp [15] have been
proposed to transfer tags from labeled to unlabeled images.
In this work we take advantage of the powerful image representation from a deep neural network to transfer labels
as well as regularize training. Similarly labels can be propagated using semantic segmentation [14]. This method is
applied on ImageNet which has a bias towards a single object appearing in the center of the image. We focus here on
images where objects appear in context.
3.2. Multiple instance learning for multilabel classification
Nearest neighbor search has also been shown to be successful in other computer vision applications which involve
3. Proposed Method
3.1. Fully Convolutional Network Architecture
We are given a set of annotated images A =
{(xi , yi )}i=1...n , where xi is an image and yi =
(yi1 , . . . , yiN ) ∈ {0, 1}N is a binary vector determining
which object category labels are present in xi . Let f l be
the object heatmap for the lth label in the final layer of the
network. The probability at location j is given by applying a
sigmoid unit to the logits f l , e.g. plj = σ(fjl ).
We do not have access to the location information of the
objects since we are in a weakly labeled setting. Therefore,
to compute the probability score for the lth object category to
appear at the jth location, we incorporate a multiple instance
learning approach with Noisy-OR operation [28, 41, 11].
The probability for label l is given by Equation 1. Also, for
learning the parameters of the FCN, we use stochastic gradient descent to minimize the cross-entropy loss L formalized
in Equation 2.
Y
pl = 1 −
(1 − plj ).
(1)
L=
N
X
j
−y l log pl − (1 − y l ) log (1 − pl )
(2)
l=1
3.3. Visual Self-Regularization
It has been observed that deep neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples [39]. Let x be an image
and η a small perturbation such that kηk∞ ≤ . If the
perturbation is aligned with the gradient of the loss function η = sign(∇x L) which is the most discriminative
direction in the image space, then the output of the network
may change dramatically, even though the perturbed image
x̃ = x + η is virtually indistinguishable from the original.
Goodfellow et al. suggest that this is due to the linear nature
of deep neural networks. They also show that augmenting
the training set with adversarial examples results in regularization similar to dropout[13].
In Virtual Adversarial Training [31] the perturbation is
produced by maximizing the smoothness of the local model
distribution around each data point. This method does not
require the labels for data perturbations and can also be used
in semi-supervised learning. The virtual adversarial example
is the point in an ball around the datapoint that maximally
perturbs the label distribution around that point as measured
by the Kullback-Leibler divergence
η = arg min KL[p(y|x, θ) || p(y|x + r, θ)].
(3)
r:krk2 ≤
We propose to draw perturbations from a large dataset
of unlabeled images U whose cardinality is much higher
than A. For each example x, we use the example x̃ that
is nearby in the space defined by the penultimate layer in
our fully convolutional network. This layer contains spatial
and semantic information about the objects present in the
image, and therefore x and x̃ have similar semantics and
composition while they may be far away in pixel space. We
consider the cosine similarity metric to find samples which
are close to each other in the feature space and for efficiency
we compute the dot product of the L2 normalized feature
vectors. Let θ denote the optimal parameters found after
minimizing the cross-entropy loss using the training data in
A, and fθ (x) be the L2 normalized feature vector obtained
from the penultimate layer of our network(Conv(1,1,2048)).
The similarity between two images x and x0 is then computed
by their dot product S(x, x0 ) = fθ (x)T fθ (x0 ). For each
training sample (xi , yi ) in A, we find the most similar item
in U
x̃i = arg max S(xi , x),
(4)
x∈U
Algorithm 1 Distributed Regularizer Sample Search
function M AP(k, x) . k: sample index in U, x: image
data
Compute network output layer fθ (x)
Compute similarities with samples in A: si =
fθ (x)T fθ (xi ), ∀i = 1 . . . n
Sort s by descending similarity values si1 ≥ si2 . . . ≥
sin
for l = 1 to km do
EMIT il , (k, sil )
end for
end function
function R EDUCE(k, v)
. k: sample index in A, v:
Iterator over (sample index in U, similarity score) tuples
Let v = ((i1 , c1 ), (i2 , c2 ) . . .
Sort v by descending similarity values cj1 ≥ cj2 . . . ...
for l = 1 to kr do
EMIT k, ijl , cjl
end for
end function
and transfer the labels from xi , to generate a new, Real Adversarial (Regularizer), training sample (x̃i , yi ). Similar
to adversarial and virtual adversarial training, our method
improves the classification performance. We interpret our
sample perturbation as a form of adversarial training where
additional examples are sampled from a similar semantic
distribution as opposed to noise. We also used the perturbation of each labeled sample in the gradient direction (similar
to adversarial training) to find the nearest neighbor in unlabeled set and observed similar performance. Therefore,
in this paper our focus is on using the labeled samples for
finding Regularizer instances to improve performance.
3.4. Large scale approximate regularizer sample
search
In our experiments we use the YFCC dataset as our set
of unlabeled images. Since it contains 100 million images,
an exhaustive nearest neighbor search is impractical. Hence
we use the MapReduce framework [6] to find approximate
nearest neighbors in a distributed fashion. Our approach is
outlined in Algorithm 1. We first pre-compute the feature
representations fθ (xi ) for xi ∈ A. The size of A for datasets
such as MS COCO or Visual Genome is small enough that
it is possible for each mapper to load a copy into memory.
A mapper then iterates over samples x in U, computes the
feature representation fθ (x) and its inner product with the
pre-computed features in A. It emits tuples for the top km
matches that are keyed by the index in A, and also contain
the index in U and similarity score. After the shuffling phase,
the reducers can select for each sample in A the kr closest
samples in U. We use km = 1000 and kr = 10. We are
able to run the search in a few hours, with the majority of
Figure 3. Top regularizer examples from unlabeled YFCC dataset (row 2-6) that are retrieved for multi-label image queries in several of the
MS COCO categories (first row).
the time being in the mapper phase where we compute the
image feature representation. Note that our method does
not guarantee that we can retrieve the nearest neighbor for
each sample in A. Indeed, if for a sample xi there exists
km samples xj such that fθ (xj )T fθ (x̃i ) ≥ fθ (xi )T fθ (x̃i ),
then the algorithm will output either no nearest neighbor or
another sample in U. However we found our approximate
method to work well in practice.
4. Experiments
4.1. Semi-Supervised Multilabel Object Categorization and Localization
We use the MS COCO [25] and Visual Genome [21]
datasets as our source of clean training data as well as for
evaluating our algorithms. MS COCO has 80 object categories and is a common benchmark for evaluating object
detectors and classifiers in images where objects appear in
context. The more recent Visual Genome dataset has annotations for a larger number of categories than MS COCO. Applying our proposed method on the Visual Genome dataset
is important to understand whether the algorithm scales to
a larger number of categories, as it is ultimately important
to recognize thousands of object classes in real world applications. All images for both datasets come from Flickr. In
all experiments we only use the image labels for training
our models and discard image captions and bounding box
annotations.
For the MS COCO dataset we use the standard split used
in [25] for training and evaluating the models. The training
set contains 82,081 images and validation set has 40,504
images. For the Visual Genome dataset we only use object
category annotations for images. The images are labeled as a
positive instance for each object if the area ratio of the bounding box with regards to the image area is more than 0.025.
We only consider the 1,432 object categories for which there
are at least 80 image instances in the training set. The Visual
Genome test set is the intersection of Visual Genome with
the MS COCO validation set which is comprised of 17,471
images. We use the remaining 90,606 images for training our
models. As for the source of unlabeled images, we use the
tie
bottle
umbrella
refrigerator
truck
remote
Figure 4. Object localization comparison between “FCN,N-OR”(mid row) and “FCN,N-OR,V I S E R”(last row).
YFCC dataset [40] and discard the images that are present
in Visual Genome or MS COCO. The data is 14TB and is
stored in the Hadoop Distributed File System.
We use the TensorFlow software library [1] to implement
our neural networks and conduct our experiments. To conduct the distributed nearest-neighbor search, we use a CPU
cluster. We use VGG16 architecture pre-trained for the ImageNet classification task as our base network. We resize
images to 500×500. Our initial learning rate is 0.01 and we
apply the 0.1 decay factor for adapting the learning rate two
times during the training after 20K and 40K mini-batches.
We run stochastic gradient descent for 60K iterations with
mini-batches of size 15 which corresponds to 11 epochs.
We conduct our experiments on the object classification
and point-based object localization tasks. As for the object
evaluation metric, we use the mean Average Precision (AP)
metric where we first compute the precision for each class
and then take the average over classes. For evaluating our
object localization, we use the point localization metric introduced in [33], where the location for a given class is given
by the location with maximum response in the corresponding
object heatmap. The location is considered correct if it is
located inside the bounding box associated with that class.
Similar to [33] we use a tolerance of 18 pixels.
Tables 1 and 2 summarize our results with the mean AP
for the classification and localization tasks on the MS COCO
and Visual Genome datasets. We compare our performance
with three state-of-the-art methods for object localization and
classification [33, 38, 3]. In [33], to handle the uncertainty
in object localization, the last fully connected layers of the
network are considered as convolution layers and a maxpooling layer is used to hypothesize the possible location of
the object in the images. In contrast, we use Noisy-OR as
our pooling layer. In [38], a multi-scale fully convolutional
neural network called ProNet is proposed that aims to zoom
into promising object-specific boxes for localization and
classification. We compare against the different variants
of ProNet with chain and tree cascades. Our method uses
a single fully convolutional network, is simpler and has a
lighter architecture as compared to ProNet. In all tables
‘FullyConn’ refers to the standard VGG16 architecture while
’FullyConv’ refers to the fully convolutional version of our
network (see Figure 2). The Noisy-OR loss is abbreviated
as ’N-OR’, and we denote our algorithm with V I S E R.
We can see in Table 1 that our proposed algorithm reaches
50.64% accuracy in the object localization task on the MS
COCO dataset which is more than a 4% boost over [38] and
a 9.5% boost over [33]. Also, without doing any regularization and by only using Noisy OR (N-OR) paired with a
fully convolutional network, we obtain higher localization
accuracy than Oquab et al. [33] and different variants of
ProNet [38].
In the object classification task, our proposed V I S E R
approach outperforms other state-of-the-art baselines of [38,
33] by a margin of more than 4.5% and gains an accuracy
of 75.48% for the MS COCO dataset. In addition, other
variants of [38] are less accurate than our fully convolutional
network architecture with Noisy-OR pooling (‘FullyConv, NOR’). This result is consistent with the results we obtained in
the object localization task. While the method of [3] obtains
competitive performance on the MS COCO localization task,
our method outperforms it in the classification task by a large
margin of 21.4%. A recent method [9] obtains classification
and localization accuracy of 80.7% and 53.4% respectively
using the deeper ResNet [17] architecture. Hence it is not
directly comparable with ProNet [38], [3] and our method
which use the VGG [36] as base network architecture. In
addition our proposed method has a label propagation step
which produces a large set of labeled images with object level
localization in “object in context” scenes and can be used in
Table 1. Mean AP for classification and localization tasks on the
MS COCO dataset (higher is better).
Table 2. Mean AP for classification and localization tasks on the
Visual Genome dataset (higher is better).
Method
Classification
Localization
Method
Classification
Localization
Oquab et al. [33]
ProNet (proposal) [38]
ProNet (chain cascade) [38]
ProNet (tree cascade) [38]
Bency et al. [3]
62.8
67.8
69.2
70.9
54.1
41.2
43.5
45.4
46.4
49.2
FullyConn
FullyConv,N-OR
FullyConv,N-OR,AT [13]
FullyConv,N-OR,VAT [31]
FullyConv,N-OR,V I S E R
9.94
12.35
13.96
13.95
14.82
–
7.55
9.05
9.06
9.74
FullyConn
FullyConv,N-OR
FullyConv,N-OR,AT [13]
FullyConv,N-OR,VAT [31]
FullyConv,N-OR,V I S E R
66.68
72.52
74.38
74.30
75.48
–
47.47
49.75
49.42
50.64
other learning methods. Also, the method of [9] is based on a
new pooling mechanism while our method proposes a better
regularization for training ConvNets using a large scale set of
unlabeled images in a semi-supervised setting and therefore
is orthogonal to [9]. We also perform an ablation study and
compare against other forms of regularization using our fully
convolutional network architecture with Noisy-OR pooling
(‘FullyConv, N-OR’). In Table 1 and 2, we compare three
forms of regularization: adversarial training (‘AT’) [13],
virtual adversarial training (‘VAT’) [31], and our proposed
Visual Self-Regularization (V I S E R) using the YFCC dataset
as source of unlabeled images.
To conclude, our proposed approach outperforms state-ofthe-art methods as well as several baselines by a substantial
margin in object classification and localization tasks according to the results shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Hence, the
regularization mechanism of our proposed method results
in a performance boost compared to the other forms of adversarial example data augmentation. We show that visual
self-regularizers (V I S E R) make our learning robust to noise
and provides better generalization capabilities.
4.2. Object-in-Context Retrieval
To qualitatively evaluate V I S E R, we show several examples of the Regularizer instances retrieved using our approach in Figure 3. For each of the labeled images shown in
the first row of Figure 3, we show the top 5 retrieved images.
As we can see, the unlabeled images retrieved by our approach have high similarity with the queried labeled image.
Furthermore, most of the objects in the labeled images also
appear in the retrieved images. This observation qualitatively
demonstrates the effectiveness of our label propagation approach. It is worth mentioning that Figure 3 shows that the
relative location of the objects in the retrieved images is
fairly consistent with that of the query images. This suggests that our simultaneous categorization and localization
approach can also be used for propagating bounding box
annotations.
Figure 1 shows the results of our V I S E R approach on
the ‘Bus’ category. We visualize the t-SNE [27] map of
the whole set of images labeled as ‘Bus’ which includes
instances from both the labeled images in the MS COCO
and unlabeled instances from the YFCC dataset. To produce
the t-SNE visualization we take the output of the penultimate
layer of our network as explained in Section 3. We L2
normalize the feature vectors to compute the pairwise cosine
similarity between images using a dot product. We visualize
the t-SNE map using a grid [20]. A different background
color (blue vs. green) is assigned to images depending on
whether they are from the labeled or unlabeled set. Notice
that it is challenging to determine the color corresponding
to each dataset as photos are from a similar domain. The
images with a blue background belong to the MS COCO
dataset and the images with a green background belong to
the YFCC dataset. This visualization reveals that there are
many images in the large unlabeled web resources that can
potentially be used to populate the fully annotated dataset
with more examples. This is a step forward for improving
object categorization as well as decreasing human effort for
supervision.
Figure 6 demonstrates the qualitative performance of
“FCN,N-OR,V I S E R” for multi-label localization. We visualize the object localization score maps where the localization
regions with high probability are shown in green. We also
display the localized objects using red dots. The score maps
show that our approach can accurately localize small and
big objects even in extreme cases where a big portion of the
object is occluded. In the first row of Figure 6 ‘dog’ and
‘laptop’ are localized quite accurately while they are largely
occluded and truncated. Similarly, the third row shows the
accurate localization of a ‘chair’ although it appears in a
small region of the image and is largely occluded. When
there are multiple instances of an object category, such as
‘person’ in the second row, ‘potted plant’ in the third row,
and ‘car’ in the sixth row, all regions corresponding to these
instances get a high score.
The failure cases of our approach are distinguished via
red boxes in Figure 6. For instance, the ‘skateboard’ in row
6 is localized around the region close to the person’s leg. In
row 8, although the ‘backpack’ region gets a high score map,
it fails to contain the highest peak and thus the localization
metric considers it as a mistake.
0.95
0.80
0.65
0.50
0.35
0.20
Cross entropy
Dropout
Adversarial training
VAT
VISER(ours)
0.05
Figure 5. Generalization comparison on a synthetic dataset between proposed V I S E R , dropout, adversarial training, and virtual adversarial
training (VAT). Training samples are shown with black borders and rest of instances are test set. Each plot demonstrates the contour of the
p(y = 1|x, θ), from p = 0 (blue) to p = 1 (red).
Table 3. Classification error on test synthetic dataset (lower is better).
Error(%)
cross entropy
dropout [37]
AT [13]
VAT [31]
VISER
9.244±0.651
9.262±0.706
8.960±0.849
8.940±0.393
8.508±0.493
We show several examples of the localization score maps
produced by “FCN,N-OR” and “FCN,N-OR,V I S E R” in Figure 4. By comparing the localized regions in green, we
see that “FCN,N-OR,V I S E R” can locate both small and
big objects more accurately. For example, in localizing
small objects such as ‘tie’, ‘bottle’ and ‘remote’, the peak
of the localization region produced by “FCN,N-OR” has a
large distance with the correct location of the object while
“FCN,N-OR,V I S E R” localizes these objects precisely. Also,
“FCN,N-OR” fails to be as accurate as “FCN,N-OR,V I S E R”
in localizing big objects such as ‘umbrella’ and ‘refrigerator’.
4.3. Classification on Synthetic Data
In order to evaluate the ability of our algorithm to leverage
unlabeled data to regularize learning, we generate a synthetic
two-class dataset with a multimodal distribution. The dataset
contains 16 training instances (each class has 8 modes with
random mean and covariance for each mode and 1 random
sample per mode is selected), 1000 unlabeled and 1000 test
samples. We linearly embed the data in 100 dimensions.
Since the data has different modes, we can mimic the object
categorization task where each object category appears in a
variety of shapes and poses, each of which can be considered
as a mode in the distribution.
We use a multi layer neural network with two fully connected layers of size 100, each followed by a ReLU activation and optimized via the cross-entropy loss. We compare
the generalization behavior of V I S E R with the following regularization methods: dropout [37], adversarial training [13],
and virtual adversarial training (VAT) [31]. The contour
visualization of the estimated model distribution is shown
in Figure 5. We can see that both adversarial training and
virtual adversarial training are vulnerable to the location
of the training sample of each mode. These regularization
techniques can learn a good boundary of the class when
the training instance is at the center of the mode, but they
over-smooth the boundary whenever the training instance is
off-center. However, our proposed V I S E R sampling from
unlabeled data learns a better local class distribution as adversarial samples follow the true distribution of the data and are
less biased to the training instances. The dropout technique
is also learning a good regularization, but it is less smooth at
the boundaries of the local modes. Table 3 summarizes the
misclassification error on test data over 50 independent runs
on the synthetic dataset.
5. Conclusion and Future Work
In this paper we have presented a simple yet effective
method to leverage a large unlabeled dataset in addition to
a small labeled dataset to train more accurate image classifiers. Our semi-supervised learning approach is able to find
Regularizer examples from a large unlabeled dataset. We
have achieved significant improvements on the MS COCO
and Visual Genome datasets for both the classification and
localization tasks. The performance of our approach could
be further improved in future work by incorporating user
provided data such as ‘tags’. Also, having access to a large
set of unlabeled data is fairly common in other domains and
hence we believe our approach could be applicable beyond
visual recognition.
References
[1] M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen,
C. Citro, G. S. Corrado, A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al.
Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous
systems. 2015. 6
[2] C. Barnes, E. Shechtman, A. Finkelstein, and D. Goldman.
Patchmatch: A randomized correspondence algorithm for
structural image editing. ACM TOG, 2009. 3
[3] A. J. Bency, H. Kwon, H. Lee, S. Karthikeyan, and B. Manjunath. Weakly supervised localization using deep feature
maps. In ECCV, 2016. 2, 6, 7
Figure 6. Localization results of the proposed model on MS COCO validation set. Localization results of our proposed model trained on
MS COCO training set and YFCC100M as the source of unlabeled set. The score map and localization of positive categories are overlaid on
each image. Some failure examples are highlighted with red box for the skateboard, handbag and backpack object categories.
[4] Y. Bengio, J. Louradour, R. Collobert, and J. Weston. Curriculum learning. In ICML, 2009. 2
[5] K. P. Bennett, A. Demiriz, and R. Maclin. Exploiting unlabeled data in ensemble methods. In ACM SIGKDD, 2002.
3
[6] J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM, 2008.
3, 4
[7] J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. FeiFei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In
CVPR, 2009. 1
[8] J. Devlin, S. Gupta, R. Girshick, M. Mitchell, and C. L. Zitnick. Exploring nearest neighbor approaches for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1505.04467, 2015. 3
[9] T. Durand, T. Mordan, N. Thome, and M. Cord. Wildcat:
Weakly supervised learning of deep convnets for image classification, pointwise localization and segmentation. In CVPR,
2017. 2, 6, 7
[10] M. Everingham, A. Zisserman, C. K. Williams, L. Van Gool,
M. Allan, C. M. Bishop, O. Chapelle, N. Dalal, T. Deselaers,
G. Dorkó, et al. The pascal visual object classes challenge
2007 (voc2007) results. 2007. 2
[11] H. Fang, S. Gupta, F. Iandola, R. K. Srivastava, L. Deng,
P. Dollár, J. Gao, X. He, M. Mitchell, J. C. Platt, C. L. Zitnick,
and G. Zweig. From captions to visual concepts and back. In
CVPR, 2015. 3
[12] P. Garrigues, S. Farfade, H. Izadinia, K. Boakye, and Y. Kalantidis. Tag prediction at flickr: a view from the darkroom.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01922, 2016. 2
[13] I. J. Goodfellow, J. Shlens, and C. Szegedy. Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1412.6572, 2014. 2, 4, 7, 8
[14] M. Guillaumin, D. Küttel, and V. Ferrari. Imagenet autoannotation with segmentation propagation. IJCV, 2014. 3
[15] M. Guillaumin, T. Mensink, J. Verbeek, and C. Schmid. Tagprop: Discriminative metric learning in nearest neighbor models for image auto-annotation. In ICCV, 2009. 3
[16] J. Hays and A. A. Efros. Scene completion using millions of
photographs. In ACM TOG, 2007. 3
[17] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. Deep residual learning
for image recognition. In CVPR, 2016. 6
[18] H. Izadinia, B. C. Russell, A. Farhadi, M. D. Hoffman, and
A. Hertzmann. Deep classifiers from image tags in the wild.
In Multimedia COMMONS, 2015. 2
[19] A. Joulin, L. van der Maaten, A. Jabri, and N. Vasilache.
Learning visual features from large weakly supervised data.
In ECCV, 2016. 2
[20] A. Karpathy.
t-SNE visualization of CNN codes.
http://cs.stanford.edu/people/karpathy/
cnnembed/. 7
[21] R. Krishna, Y. Zhu, O. Groth, J. Johnson, K. Hata, J. Kravitz,
S. Chen, Y. Kalantidis, L.-J. Li, D. A. Shamma, M. Bernstein,
and L. Fei-Fei. Visual genome: Connecting language and
vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. IJCV,
2017. 1, 5
[22] A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. Imagenet
classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In
NIPS, 2012. 1
[23] A. Kurakin, I. Goodfellow, and S. Bengio. Adversarial examples in the physical world. ICLR Workshop, 2017. 2
[24] A. Kurakin, I. J. Goodfellow, and S. Bengio. Adversarial
machine learning at scale. In ICLR, 2017. 2
[25] T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common
objects in context. In ECCV, 2014. 1, 5
[26] J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. Fully convolutional
networks for semantic segmentation. In CVPR, 2015. 3
[27] L. v. d. Maaten and G. Hinton. Visualizing data using t-sne.
JMLR, 2008. 2, 7
[28] O. Maron and T. Lozano-Pérez. A framework for multipleinstance learning. NIPS, 1998. 3
[29] G. A. Miller. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 1995. 1
[30] T. Miyato, A. M. Dai, and I. Goodfellow. Adversarial training
methods for semi-supervised text classification. In ICLR,
2017. 2
[31] T. Miyato, S.-i. Maeda, M. Koyama, K. Nakae, and S. Ishii.
Distributional smoothing with virtual adversarial training. In
ICLR, 2016. 2, 4, 7, 8
[32] K. Nigam, A. K. McCallum, S. Thrun, and T. Mitchell. Text
classification from labeled and unlabeled documents using
em. Machine learning, 2000. 3
[33] M. Oquab, L. Bottou, I. Laptev, and J. Sivic. Is object localization for free?-weakly-supervised learning with convolutional
neural networks. In CVPR, 2015. 2, 6, 7
[34] S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards
real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In
NIPS, 2015. 1, 2
[35] O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma,
Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla, M. Bernstein, A. C. Berg,
and L. Fei-Fei. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV, 2015. 1
[36] K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. Very deep convolutional
networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint
arXiv:1409.1556, 2014. 3, 6
[37] N. Srivastava, G. E. Hinton, A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and
R. Salakhutdinov. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural
networks from overfitting. JMLR, 2014. 8
[38] C. Sun, M. Paluri, R. Collobert, R. Nevatia, and L. Bourdev. Pronet: Learning to propose object-specific boxes for
cascaded neural networks. In CVPR, 2016. 2, 6, 7
[39] C. Szegedy, W. Zaremba, I. Sutskever, J. Bruna, D. Erhan,
I. Goodfellow, and R. Fergus. Intriguing properties of neural
networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6199, 2013. 2, 4
[40] B. Thomee, D. A. Shamma, G. Friedland, B. Elizalde, K. Ni,
D. Poland, D. Borth, and L.-J. Li. YFCC100M: The new data
in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM, 2016.
1, 5
[41] C. Zhang, J. C. Platt, and P. A. Viola. Multiple instance
boosting for object detection. In NIPS, 2005. 3
[42] B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Lapedriza, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba.
Learning deep features for discriminative localization. In
CVPR, 2016. 2
[43] X. Zhu and Z. Ghahramani. Learning from labeled and unlabeled data with label propagation. 2002. 3
| 1cs.CV
|
Article
Antenna Arrays for Line-Of-Sight Massive MIMO:
Half Wavelength Is Not Enough
Daniele Pinchera *, Marco Donald Migliore, Fulvio Schettino and Gaetano Panariello
DIEI and ELEDIA@UNICAS, University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via G. Di Biasio 43, 03043 Cassino, Italy;
[email protected] (M.D.M.); [email protected] (F.S.); [email protected] (G.P.)
* Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0776-299-4348
arXiv:1705.06804v2 [cs.IT] 1 Sep 2017
Received: 22 July 2017; Accepted: 8 August 2017; Published: 10 August 2017
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the array synthesis for 5 G massive MIMO systems
in the line-of-sight working condition. The main result of the numerical investigation performed
is that non-uniform arrays are the natural choice in this kind of application. In particular, by
using non-equispaced arrays, we show that it is possible to achieve a better average condition
number of the channel matrix and a significantly higher spectral efficiency. Furthermore, we verify
that increasing the array size is beneficial also for circular arrays, and we provide some useful
rules-of-thumb for antenna array design for massive MIMO applications. These results are in contrast
to the widely-accepted idea in the 5 G massive MIMO literature, in which the half-wavelength linear
uniform array is universally adopted.
Keywords: MIMO; antenna arrays; line-of-sight propagation; millimeter wave propagation;
5 G mobile communication
1. Introduction
Massive MIMO is going to become one of the key technologies of the incoming next generation 5
G wireless systems [1–12]. In particular, the use of frequencies above 6 GHz seems to be particularly
appealing, because of two main reasons: first of all, the availability of wide contiguous frequency
bands to exploit for communications; second, the relative compactness of the resulting arrays [12–15].
If we briefly focus on this second aspect, we would observe that the use of a frequency of the
order of 60 GHz would mean a wavelength λ of 5 mm; thus, a 100λ array would be just half a meter
in size.
The use of mm-length frequencies is not, unfortunately, without drawbacks. The well-known
Friis formula for wireless connections shows a power attenuation that increases with the square of
the wavelength, which significantly reduces the area that can be covered by a transmitting antenna.
Furthermore, the propagation of the waves at mm-wave frequencies is much different from the
propagation at lower frequencies, resembling more a quasi-optical connection between the terminals:
the rich scattering condition is really difficult to realize, and the Line-of-Sight (LoS) component becomes
dominant (if not the only present) [16,17].
This fact has posed some questions on the actual possibility to achieve the so-called “favorable
propagation” in the Multi-User MIMO (MU-MIMO) channel matrix, but both measurements and
simulations have confirmed the advantages of massive MIMO also in the extreme LoS condition [18–24].
One of the key points to understand why massive MIMO keeps on working with a very good spectral
efficiency also in this case is that the massive antenna array, because of its huge size, does not work
in the far-field condition, so that the wave fronts are not planar, but spherical: we could be able to
distinguish between two terminals positioned at the same angle with respect to the Base Station (BS)
by means of their different distances [25–27].
Electronics 2017, 6, 57; doi:10.3390/electronics6030057
www.mdpi.com/journal/electronics
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
2 of 20
Among the many aspects of massive MIMO systems, the optimization of the radiation system
has been the object of relatively little research, and equispaced half-wavelength arrays are commonly
considered for massive MIMO antennas. However, as pointed out above, massive MIMO antennas
work in the near-field condition. This characteristic does not seem to have been exploited in the
literature. A further point to be better explored is the reduction of the cost and the complexity of the
overall antenna, which is critically related to the number of radiating elements.
Accordingly, a fundamental consideration is now in order: is it possible to exploit this near-field
behavior with a fixed complexity of the antenna in terms of the number of elements without affecting,
or hopefully increasing, the performance? This paper will try to answer this question, showing that
optimization of the antenna array using non-uniform arrays in the case of linear antennas and properly
equispaced arrays in circular antennas can allow a significant improvement of the communication
system performance.
2. Antennas and Propagation Model
In this paper, we will use a simplified model for antennas and propagation; in particular, we will
consider isotropic radiating elements; we will neglect the effect of mutual coupling and polarization,
and we will consider a simple 2D propagation model, i.e., BS antennas and user terminals will lie on the
same plane. Furthermore, we will consider a fixed frequency f and the corresponding wavelength λ.
These assumptions have a two-fold reason; first, the model we will discuss, and the achieved
results, could be easily reproduced by any interested reader; second, the simplified model will allow
us to remove the aspects that play a minor role in the definition of the channel matrix (polarization
and mutual coupling), focusing only on the aspects, like the antenna positioning, that play the main
role in the overall system performance.
In particular, we will consider a linear antenna array of N identical elements, with the antennas
aligned along the x axis, whose abscissas are stored in the vectors xs = [ xs,1 ; · · · ; xs,N ]. The position
of the K terminal antennas will be instead described by the vectors xt = [ xt,1 ; · · · ; xt,K ] and yt =
[yt,1 ; · · · ; yt,K ] (see Figure 1). The transfer function between the n-th antenna of the BS and the k-th
terminal will be achieved as:
e− jβRn,k
hn,k = γ
(1)
Rn,k
where γ is an inessential multiplicative constant, β = 2π/λ is the free space wavenumber and:
Rn,k =
q
( xs,n − xt,k )2 + y2t,k
(2)
The MU-MIMO channel matrix can be thus built as:
H = [ h1 · · · h K ]
(3)
where the column vector hk represents the channel response of the k-th terminal.
This channel matrix can be properly normalized, according to the guidelines in [20] before
performing its singular value decomposition or calculating the spectral efficiency (thus making the
constant γ inessential). It has also to be underlined that the use of Equation (1) allows us to take into
account the different power received by the antennas at the base station because of their different
distance from the terminals, as well as the spherical shape of the wavefronts.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
3 of 20
Figure 1. Massive MIMO system scenario. Circles: base station antennas; squares: terminals.
3. User Correlation Analysis
From this section on, we will choose f = 60 GHz as the working frequency and a base station
array of 200 elements. The choice of considering a fixed number of antennas at the BS has been made
just to compare different antenna geometries with the same system complexity.
In order to get better insight into the effect of the antenna shape on the system performance,
we will start considering the simple case of only two terminals, and we will calculate the correlation
coefficient between the two columns of H, as:
χ1,2 =
|h1 · h2∗ |
.
||h1 || ||h2 ||
(4)
The use of this performance metric is due to the fact that it provides a simple way to check
the effectiveness of a maximal ratio combining approach at the BS; furthermore, as will be clear in
the following, it allows us to provide a simple and effective graphical description of the correlation
between user terminal positions.
Let us first consider the case of an equispaced array, with the inter-element distance d = λ/2;
in Figure 2, it is possible to see the case in which the two terminals are aligned along the y axis,
and have only different distances (r1 and r2 ) from the BS. In the left subplot, we can see an image map
representing the correlation coefficient of Equation (4) for variable r1 and r2 , while in the right subplot,
we can see the plot of the correlation coefficient for some fixed values of r2 . This figure confirms that
it is possible to distinguish between two users sharing the same angular position with respect to the
center of the BS, but this feature can be exploited only when one terminal is very close to the BS with
respect to the other.
It has to be underlined that this behavior has been obtained when the two terminals lie on
the y axis; for other directions, it is possible to obtain different plots, showing a slightly increased
correlation, not reported here for the lack of space.
Let us now consider an equispaced array with a larger inter-element distance, say d = 2λ. From an
antenna point of view, increasing the inter element distance, without changing the number of elements,
increases the far-field distance of the array, which is conventionally calculated as:
r FAR =
2[( N − 1)d]2
.
λ
(5)
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
4 of 20
This means that an increase of the inter-element distance of a four factor increases the far field
distance of a 16 factor. In Figure 3, we can see the image map and the plot of the correlation for the
larger array. It is clear that we are now allowed to easily distinguish two users that share the same
angular position with respect to the BS, much more than in the previous case.
Figure 2. Two terminal correlation analysis for the λ/2 equispaced array. (Left) Image map with the
correlation level for variable r1 and r2 ; (right): plot of the correlation coefficient for some fixed values
of r2 .
Figure 3. Two terminal correlation analysis for the 2λ equispaced array. (Left) Image map with the
correlation level for variable r1 and r2 ; (right): plot of the correlation coefficient for some fixed values
of r2 .
The previous result has shown that the increase of the inter-element distance seems to have
a beneficial effect on the capability of decorrelating users. To confirm this feature, let us see what
happens if we consider the first terminal in a fixed position with respect to the array, and we move
the second terminal on the xy plane. In Figure 4, we can see the case of a λ/2 equispaced array:
apart from an angular sector around the broadside direction of the array, the correlation is very low,
thus confirming the very good results, in terms of favorable propagation, found by other researchers.
If we instead employ the 2λ equispaced array, we obtain the result depicted in Figure 5: apart from
the broadside direction, which shows a slightly lower correlation level with respect to the λ/2 case,
there are other directions in space that present a non-negligible correlation. These regions are related to
the unavoidable grating lobes, appearing when we consider equispaced elements with an inter-element
distance greater than half-wavelength. Clearly, the presence of grating lobes causes ambiguities and
must be avoided. As an example, let us imagine a communication system with just two user terminals:
when user Terminal A is in the angular position of a grating lobe relative to user Terminal B, it could
be very difficult to distinguish them.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
5 of 20
Figure 4. Image map of the correlation coefficient when the first terminal is fixed in the position marked
with the circle and the second user is moved on the plane for the λ/2 equispaced array.
Figure 5. Image map of the correlation coefficient when the first terminal is fixed in the position marked
with the circle and the second user is moved on the plane for the 2λ equispaced array.
We would like to specify that in an array not working in the far field region, we could not
rigorously talk of grating lobes, but for the sake of simplicity, we will keep on using this definition for
the rest of the manuscript.
According to the correlation analysis, it seems that the possible advantage of distinguish
aligned user terminals could be negated by the effect of grating lobes. These results suggest that a
non-equispaced array, not affected by grating lobes, could get the advantages of a larger size of the
array, without the drawbacks of the grating lobes, but to confirm this hypothesis, we are first required
to analyze what happens with multiple terminals.
4. Multi User Channel Matrix
Let us now consider a number K of terminals, uniformly randomly displaced in an angular sector
ϕ ∈ [− ϕs , ϕs ], with a minimum distance rmin and a maximum distance rmax from the center of the BS
array. For all of the simulations that will be discussed in this section, we will use ϕs = π/3, rmin = 5 m
and rmax = 200 m; the choice of these parameters has been done in order to simulate a sectorized
coverage of a large planar area, like a plaza or a park. It has to be underlined that differently from [28],
we will consider a fixed number of antennas at the BS, in order to compare systems with the same
complexity (and cost).
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
6 of 20
In order to better emphasize the possibility to discriminate different users according to their
distance, we will employ “Normalization 1” from [20]. In this way, all of the columns of the channel
matrix H will have the same norm, thus removing the unbalance of channel attenuation between users
due to their different relative distance from the BS. M = 1000 different random scenarios have been
considered in the numerical simulations.
As a first test, in Figure 6, we show as a function of the inter-element distance d and the number
of users K the average condition number of the channel matrix, defined as:
ρdB = 20 ∗ log10
σ1
σK
(6)
where σ1 and σK are the greatest and smallest singular values of the channel matrix. The choice of
the condition number is due to the fact that it provides a direct indication of the orthogonality of the
columns of the channel matrix, and it is related to the stability of its inversion [29], needed in many
multi-user MIMO transmission schemes [30].
Figure 6. Mean condition number of the channel matrix as a function of the inter-element distance d
and the number of users K.
The main advantage in using the condition number is that the presented results are independent
of the actual SNR at the receiver; it is indeed true that the condition number provides only a rough
indication of the channel quality, since it gives only the spread of the singular values and not their
actual distribution, but its value is strongly related with the performances of MIMO precoders and
detectors [31–33].
We see that the average condition number is an increasing function of the number of users, but it
is interesting to note that (besides some oscillations), it is also a decreasing function of the inter-element
distance d at the base station, confirming the advantages of a larger array at the BS foreseen in the
previous paragraph.
A brief discussion of the oscillations is now needed. Taking as a reference the K = 100 curve of
Figure 6, we can see that the condition number increases up to about d = 0.7λ, then it decreases up to
d = 1.1λ, then it increase again up to d = 1.3λ, and so on. As we have seen in Figure 5, the presence
of grating lobes implies that a number of angular regions of the scenario should be avoided for an
effective communication. The number of grating lobes that affect the results is indeed an increasing
discrete function of d, while the reduction of the beamwidth and the correlation among users sharing
the same angle ϕ with respect to the BS are instead a continuous decreasing function of d. These two
effects together contribute to the aforementioned oscillating/decreasing behavior seen in Figure 6.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
7 of 20
It is important to recall that a very low condition number is necessary to apply the Maximal Ratio
Combining (MRC) algorithm at the BS, and a low condition number is also necessary to correctly
calculate the matrix inversion needed to efficiently use Zero Forcing (ZF) at the BS [11,34].
To get better insight into this result, let us focus on the case of K = 50; in Figure 7, we show the
distribution of the condition number as a function of the distance d (each column of the matrix in the
image map is a histogram of the condition number). The increase of d from λ/2 to 2λ reduces the
average value of the condition number of about 15 dB, and also, its spreading decreases.
Figure 7. Distribution of the condition number as a function of the distance d for K = 50. Each column
of the matrix in the image map is a histogram of the condition number.
With reference to the two extreme cases of d = λ/2 and d = 2λ, let us now analyze the distribution
of the singular values for K = 50. In Figures 8 and 9, we have the image map of the distribution of the
singular values, as well as the plot of their average values. The larger spacing improves in particular
the lower singular values, leading to a much more stable inversion.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
8 of 20
Figure 8. Singular values analysis for d = λ/2 and K = 50. (Left) Image map of the distribution of
each one of the 50 singular values; (right) solid line, average singular values; dashed lines, average
singular values ± the standard deviation of the distribution.
It has to be underlined that the results achieved in this paragraph hold also when we do not
consider the normalization. Since we would just see a slightly larger spreading of the singular values
for all of the considered cases, we do not report these results because of the limited space of the paper.
Figure 9. Singular values analysis for d = 2λ and K = 50. (Left) Image map of the distribution of each
one of the 50 singular values. (Right) solid line, average singular values; dashed lines, average singular
values ± the standard deviation of the distribution.
5. Exploiting Sparse Arrays
In the previous section, we have shown that increasing the size of the array is beneficial to the
overall MU-MIMO channel matrix condition number: even if we have to deal with the effect of grating
lobes, the possibility to discriminate sources that share a similar angular direction, as well as the
reduced width of the main beam lead to a better conditioned matrix.
It is trivial to recognize that, if we could get rid of the grating lobes, we should expect a further
improvement of the performances. To this aim, we would have two different possibilities: in the first
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
9 of 20
case, we could employ a sub-array architecture [35], but we should also deal with the reduced scanning
capability of our array (and hence, the dimension of the sector we could cover); the second possibility
would be to employ a non-equispaced, sparse array.
The synthesis of sparse arrays is one of the most studied antenna topics in the last 50 years,
and a very large number of methods and algorithms has been developed for linear and planar
arrays [36–47]. Unfortunately, none of these algorithms can be directly applied to an MU-MIMO system:
our aim is to obtain the antenna positions, within a given range, that allow the best performances of a
multi-user scenario, and this problem cannot be directly translated into a classical antenna pattern
synthesis problem.
To solve this issue, we propose a novel paradigm for antenna array synthesis, inspired by the
results presented in the previous paragraph: we will be seeking for the antenna positions providing the
best performances on a relatively large set of user terminal scenarios. We could, for example, optimize
the antenna array to provide the lowest average condition number of the channel matrix, or we could
look for the antenna configuration that guarantees the lowest 0.99-quantile of the condition number.
Once we have defined our optimization objective, we could use an evolutionary search method
to achieve the sought antenna positions. Actually, the direct application of this approach could be
very ineffective, since the number of unknowns we have to deal with is of the order of the number
of antennas, and evolutionary algorithms are known to require a computational time that increases
exponentially with the number of unknowns [48].
A much more convenient, yet sub-optimal, choice is to define a proper parametrization of the
antenna positions, thus reducing the search space of the evolutionary algorithm to a small number of
parameters and leading to a reasonable computational time.
A simple and effective parametrization of the antenna positions can be found using Tchebyshev
polynomials. If we are looking for a symmetric array, the position of the n-th antenna xs,n could be
found has:
!
!
P
xs,n = L
1−
∑ αp
p =1
with:
L=
P
un +
∑ α p T2p+1 (un )
(7)
p =1
d0
2( N − 1)
(8)
where Tp (·) is the Tchebyshev polynomial of order p, [α1 , · · · , α P ] is the set of P parameters defining
the position of the antenna elements, d0 is the desired average inter-element distance, N is the overall
number of antennas and [u1 ; · · · ; u N ] is an equispaced ordered sampling of the interval [−1, 1]. Not all
of the combinations of [α1 ; · · · ; α P ] would lead to a monotonically-increasing vector of positions xs in
the range [− L, L]; for instance, it is easy to demonstrate that if P = 1, any value of α1 in the range:
−
1
1
< α1 <
8
4
(9)
would lead to a set of positions in the range [− L, L] satisfying the monotonicity constraint, but for
higher values of P, it would be non-trivial to achieve a formula like Equation (9) in closed form.
In the remaining part of the paper, we will focus on the relatively easy case of P = 1; this choice
is justified by the results of some numerical tests, which have shown only a marginal improvement
when using P > 1. In particular, values of α1 < 0 would lead to antenna arrays with a higher density
of elements at the extrema, while values of α1 > 0 would lead to antenna arrays with a higher density
of elements at the center.
Following the guidelines discussed before, we will consider now a parametric analysis of the
performances, in terms of average condition number, on a set of 1000 configurations of K = 50 user
terminals, as a function of α1 . The result is depicted in Figure 10: apart from values very close to α1 = 0,
corresponding to the equispaced array, we achieve a significant advantage in the mean condition
number for both positive and negative values of α1 (with a slight advantage for the latter).
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
10 of 20
Figure 10. Average condition number as a function of α1 for a number of users K = 50 and d0 = 2λ.
To get better insight into this surprising result and to better understand the effect of the non-linear
spacing on the array performances, we will consider the same analysis developed in the previous
two paragraphs on a test array obtained with α = −0.03 with an average inter-element distance
d0 = 2λ. The choice of this particular value of α1 is driven by the desire of reducing the spreading of
the inter-element distance, in particular in this case, we have a minimum inter-element distance (at the
edges) of 1.53λ and a maximum inter-element distance (at the center) of 2.24λ.
In Figure 11, we can see that the capability of the array to distinguish terminals sharing the same
angular position with respect to the BS has been marginally improved with respect to the case of
Figure 3. The difference with respect to the corresponding equispaced array is instead much clearer
from the analysis of Figure 12: now, the effect of the grating lobes is replaced by some sectors of the
plane that show a lower (but non-null) correlation coefficient.
Figure 11. Two terminal correlation analysis for the 2λ non-equispaced array with α1 = −0.03. (Left)
Image map with the correlation level for variable r1 and r2 ; (right) plot of the correlation coefficient for
some fixed values of r2 .
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
11 of 20
Figure 12. Image map of the correlation coefficient when the first terminals are fixed in the position
marked with the circle and the second user is moved on the plane for the 2λ non-equispaced array
with α1 = −0.03.
In Figure 13, we have instead depicted the effect of the non-linear spacing for a variable number
of the average inter-element distance d and the number of users K: the oscillatory behavior of Figure
6 has now disappeared, and the condition number is now a monotonic function of the number of
terminals and the average inter-element distance. The improvement with respect to the equispaced
array is even more significant when the number of user terminals is higher. It is worth underlining
that the use of a non-equispaced array is beneficial even when using an inter-element distance only
slightly higher than half-wavelength, so to achieve a performance improvement, we are not required
to employ large array sizes.
It is also interesting to see that the spreading of the condition number is reduced when using
a non-equispaced array: the result in Figure 14, where the case with K = 50 is analyzed, shows a
conditioning significantly better than the one presented in the equispaced case of Figure 7, for any
average inter-element spacing. Finally, also the analysis of the distribution of the singular values for
the K = 50 case confirms the advantages of the non-equispaced array (see Figure 15).
Figure 13. Mean condition number of the channel matrix as a function of the average inter-element
distance d and the number of users K for a non-equispaced array with α1 = −0.03.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
12 of 20
Figure 14. Distribution of the condition number as a function of the average distance d for K = 50 and
the sparse array with α1 = −0.03. Each column of the matrix in the image map is a histogram of the
condition number.
Figure 15. Singular values analysis for d0 = 2λ, α1 = −0.03 and K = 50. (Left) Image map of the
distribution of each one of the 50 singular values; (right) solid line, average singular values; dashed
lines, average singular values ± the standard deviation of the distribution.
It is important to underline that, whatever the optimization approach used to define the position
of the elements in the sparse array, those positions are fixed: their choice has to be done only once,
when designing the array.
It is also worth underlining that in the simulations shown, no smart terminal selection
techniques [18] have been employed. This means that we can achieve an even better conditioned
channel matrix by the application of these approaches.
6. Circular Arrays
In the previous sections, we have considered linear BS arrays for a sectoral coverage; if the
terminals are displaced in a circular area, it could be convenient to use a circular array. The increase of
the antenna dimension, without changing the number of active elements, can be very beneficial also in
this case.
A circular array does not show grating lobes, so it will not be necessary to consider non-equispaced
positioning of the array elements on the circle, but the increase in size would allow a better
discrimination of the users, because of the increased far field distance of the array.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
13 of 20
To better compare the results of the present section to the results of the previous ones, we will
always consider N = 200 radiating elements, displaced on a circle of radius R = Nd/(2π ) where d is
the (approximate) inter-element distance.
For the sake of compactness of the paper, we will skip the correlation analysis, and we will
only focus on the condition number analysis of the MU-MIMO channel matrix. In particular,
we will consider a set of 1000 different propagation scenarios, where a variable number K of
randomly-positioned user terminals is displaced between a distance rmin = 5 m and rmax = 200
m from the center of the BS antenna.
In Figure 16, we can see the average condition number that we can obtain for a variable
inter-element distance d and a variable number of users K. This result confirms the importance
of increasing the size of the antenna array as much as possible if we are interested in improving the
conditioning of the channel matrix. It is also worth noting that this result is surprisingly very similar
to the result obtained with the non-equispaced antenna array of Figure 13.
In Figure 17, we instead depict the distribution of the condition number for a variable antenna
distance d for the specific case K = 50; even in this case, it is surprising to see the behavior of the
condition number that is very similar to the result depicted in Figure 14.
Finally, in Figures 18 and 19, we depict the distribution of the singular values for the two specific
cases of d = λ/2 and d = 2λ, confirming the advantage of an increased antenna array dimension.
Figure 16. Mean condition number of the channel matrix as a function of the average inter-element
distance d and the number of users K for a circular array.
Figure 17. Distribution of the condition number as a function of the average distance d for the circular
array with K = 50. Each column of the matrix in the image map is a histogram of the condition number.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
14 of 20
Figure 18. Singular values analysis for the circular array with d = λ/2 and K = 50. (Left) Image map
of the distribution of each one of the 50 singular values. (Right) solid line, average singular values;
dashed lines, average singular values ± the standard deviation of the distribution.
Figure 19. Singular values analysis for the circular array with d = 2λ and K = 50. (Left) Image map of
the distribution of each one of the 50 singular values; (right) solid line, average singular values; dashed
lines, average singular values ± the standard deviation of the distribution.
7. Evaluating the Spectral Efficiency
Up to this point, we have focused on the singular values of the channel matrix and its condition
number. As stated before, this choice provides results independent of the SNR at the receiver.
A further figure of merit that is often used in MIMO system analysis is spectral efficiency. In this
section, we show how the better conditioning of the channel matrix influences the spectral efficiency
of massive MIMO systems. In particular, we will evaluate the average maximum achievable rate using
a Zero Forcing (ZF) receiver [49], considering a set of 1000 different scenarios for the user terminals:
K
CZF =
∑
k =1
log 1 +
ρ
N [(H H H)−1 ]kk
(10)
where ρ is the average SNR at the receivers and [A]ij takes the (i, j)-entry of the matrix A.
In Figure 20, we compare the performances of the equispaced array, with inter-element distances
(λ/2, λ, 2λ), with the performances of the non-equispaced array, calculated with a α1 = −0.03 and
average inter-element distance of (λ, 2λ); the SNR at the receiver is 5 dB. It is worth noting that
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
15 of 20
the maximum spectral efficiency is increased from C = 146.1 bit/s/Hz/cell for K = 45 of the λ/2
equispaced array to C = 162.6 bit/s/Hz/cell for K = 55 for the 2λ non equispaced array.
We can obtain an average spectral efficiency gain of about 11% just positioning the radiating
element of the BS in an optimal fashion.
In Figure 21, we present the same results, but comparing only the λ/2 equispaced array and the
2λ non-equispaced array. In this plot, we also represent, by means of two colored areas, the spreading
of the spectral efficiency: the areas represent a range of a standard deviation with respect to the mean.
It is interesting to compare the “top” border of these two areas, which gives us an indication of the
performances achievable by a smart user scheduling scheme: the advantage of the non-equispaced
architecture is again clear.
As a final remark, in our numerical tests, we have also considered the Dirty Paper Coding
(DPC) capacity [30], which is calculated supposing the use of the optimum receiver. In this case, the
results are stable with respect to the inter-element distance and marginally depend on the use of
non-equispaced architectures.
The reason for this fact is that only the greatest singular values of the channel matrix affect the
DPC, and from the plots in Figures 8, 9 and 15, we can see that the distribution of the elements of the
BS array influences mostly the distribution of the smallest singular values.
Figure 20. Average maximum achievable Zero Forcing (ZF) rate as a function of the number of user
terminals K.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
16 of 20
Figure 21. Average maximum achievable ZF rate as a function of the number of user terminals K;
the areas represent the range of the standard deviation with respect to the mean.
Actually, communication schemes that achieve the DPC capacity are very hard to implement in
the massive MIMO framework, where linear processing (like ZF) is preferred for computing reasons,
and for this reason, we decided to show only the ZF performances.
8. Some Considerations and Antenna Array Design Guidelines
In this section, we would like to sum up some design consideration that can be inferred by the
shown results.
All of the simulations have been performed focusing on arrays with N = 200 radiating elements,
but we have also performed other simulations, with a different number of radiators, confirming the
advantages of sparse arrays for massive MIMO applications.
We have indeed chosen a very simple antenna model for the simulations (an array of isotropic
elements without mutual coupling), but in the examples reported in the paper, the inter-element
spacing is always larger than 0.5 wavelengths, and in some cases, it is much larger. For such
inter-element distances, it is well known that mutual coupling usually plays a minor role. Anyway,
we have performed some numerical tests including the mutual coupling (not reported here for lack
of space), and we found that there was no significant modification of the distribution of the singular
values. Similarly, the element pattern and the polarization will provide a different amplification of the
signal received by the terminals, but the overall impact on the singular values distribution would be
small. For these reasons, we preferred the use of the architecture of isotropic elements without mutual
coupling, providing more easily repeatable results by interested readers.
We would also like to underline that the proposed increase in size of the array can have an effect
on the overall cost of the antenna system, but this increment would not be significant when dealing
with mm-wave frequencies. It is indeed true that the optimization of the BS antenna that we propose
has to be realized only when setting up the system; no optimizations/antenna selections are required
during operation.
On the contrary, the use of non-equispaced architectures, instead of equispaced ones, should
not have, in general, a direct impact on the overall cost or complexity of the communication system.
The only relevant effect that should be taken into account in an architecture trade-off is the difficulty
of employing modular BS arrays (i.e., antenna arrays divided in equal modules of a fixed number of
elements): in this case, it could be advantageous to design non-equispaced modules for the BS array
and placing them in a non-regular fashion, but the discussion of this possibility goes beyond the aims
of this paper.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
17 of 20
A final consideration is now needed. In the numerical tests shown, we have considered the LoS
component only; even if this is a reasonable assumption, we could argue if the shown results hold
also when a non-LoS propagation component is present. Some preliminary simulations show that the
advantage of using larger, non-equispaced arrays is still present, but smaller. Anyway, the analysis of
this case deserves particular attention and will be the main topic of a forthcoming work.
Summing up, we would like to list some rules-of-thumb for designing massive MIMO arrays that
work in LoS propagation.
1.
2.
3.
The antenna array geometry needs to be matched to the expected user terminal displacement.
For sectoral coverage, a linear array is preferable, while for circular coverage, a circular antenna
works better, since a linear array is not capable of discriminating between two terminals in
specular positions with respect to the array.
Given the number of radiating elements, and hence transceivers, that can be used in the MIMO
system, the BS antenna array should be as large as possible.
Once the maximum dimension is used, in a linear array, the radiating elements should be
possibly arranged in a non-equispaced fashion, by using for instance the positions provided by
Equation (7).
9. Conclusions
In this paper, we have discussed the impact of the array on the performances of a massive
MIMO system.
In particular, we have analyzed the LoS case, showing that increasing the size of the array can
be very beneficial to the condition number of the MU-MIMO channel matrix: since the BS antenna
is working in the near-field region of the array, a larger element distance allows one to exploit the
spherical shape of the wavefronts.
We have also shown that using a non-equispaced array, we are able to further improve the
resulting condition number, since by getting rid of the grating lobes, we are able to achieve a significant
lowering of the average condition number also for small increases of the antenna array dimension.
Such an improvement in the conditioning of the channel matrix results in an improvement in the
spectral efficiency of the massive MIMO systems when using linear processing of the signals.
We have also analyzed the results achievable by means of circular arrays and a full circle coverage,
finding results perfectly aligned with the ones of the non-equispaced linear array.
It is worth underlining that all of the performed analyses have been done considering a fixed BS
complexity. It is trivial to understand that with a proper sparse array design, we could reduce the
number of antennas at the BS, achieving the same average conditioning of the channel matrix for a
desired number of user terminals.
It is fundamental to underline that the improvement that can be achieved by optimizing the
antenna array geometry has a minimum impact on the overall system cost and does not increase the
computational effort of the communication schemes in any way.
As a development of the present work, we are working on the design of more complex planar
and conformal antenna array geometries; we are also working towards the use of a ray-tracing
simulator, in order to check the achieved results when the line of sight is the dominant, but not the
only, propagation term present. Finally, we will investigate the effect of a joint optimization of the
antenna array when using a smart user scheduling approach.
Author Contributions: D.P.conceived of the approach and wrote the numerical code to perform the simulations.
M.D.M, G.P. and F.S. helped with the discussion and comparison of the results. D.P., M.D.M. and F.S.
wrote the paper.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
18 of 20
Hoydis, J.; Ten Brink, S.; Debbah, M. Massive MIMO: How many antennas do we need? Communication,
Control, and Computing (Allerton), 2011 49th Annual Allerton Conference on. IEEE, 2011, pp. 545–550.
Huh, H.; Caire, G.; Papadopoulos, H.C.; Ramprashad, S.A. Achieving massive MIMO spectral efficiency
with a not-so-large number of antennas. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2012, 11, 3226–3239.
Rusek, F.; Persson, D.; Lau, B.K.; Larsson, E.G.; Marzetta, T.L.; Edfors, O.; Tufvesson, F. Scaling up MIMO:
Opportunities and challenges with very large arrays. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2013, 30, 40–60.
Hoydis, J.; Hosseini, K.; Brink, S.t.; Debbah, M. Making smart use of excess antennas: Massive MIMO,
small cells, and TDD. Bell Labs Technical Journal 2013, 18, 5–21.
Nam, Y.H.; Ng, B.L.; Sayana, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Kim, Y.; Lee, J. Full-dimension MIMO (FD-MIMO) for
next generation cellular technology. IEEE Communications Magazine 2013, 51, 172–179.
Hoydis, J.; Ten Brink, S.; Debbah, M. Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of cellular networks: How many
antennas do we need? IEEE Journal on selected Areas in Communications 2013, 31, 160–171.
Lu, L.; Li, G.Y.; Swindlehurst, A.L.; Ashikhmin, A.; Zhang, R. An overview of massive MIMO: Benefits
and challenges. IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing 2014, 8, 742–758.
Boccardi, F.; Heath, R.W.; Lozano, A.; Marzetta, T.L.; Popovski, P. Five disruptive technology directions for
5G. IEEE Communications Magazine 2014, 52, 74–80.
Jungnickel, V.; Manolakis, K.; Zirwas, W.; Panzner, B.; Braun, V.; Lossow, M.; Sternad, M.; Apelfrojd, R.;
Svensson, T. The role of small cells, coordinated multipoint, and massive MIMO in 5G. IEEE Communications
Magazine 2014, 52, 44–51.
Larsson, E.G.; Edfors, O.; Tufvesson, F.; Marzetta, T.L. Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems.
IEEE Communications Magazine 2014, 52, 186–195.
Björnson, E.; Sanguinetti, L.; Hoydis, J.; Debbah, M. Optimal design of energy-efficient multi-user MIMO
systems: Is massive MIMO the answer? IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2015, 14, 3059–3075.
Björnson, E.; Larsson, E.G.; Marzetta, T.L. Massive MIMO: Ten myths and one critical question. IEEE
Communications Magazine 2016, 54, 114–123.
Swindlehurst, A.L.; Ayanoglu, E.; Heydari, P.; Capolino, F. Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: the next
wireless revolution? IEEE Communications Magazine 2014, 52, 56–62.
Lee, G.; Sung, Y.; Seo, J. Randomly-directional beamforming in millimeter-wave multiuser MISO downlink.
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2016, 15, 1086–1100.
Puglielli, A.; Townley, A.; LaCaille, G.; Milovanović, V.; Lu, P.; Trotskovsky, K.; Whitcombe, A.; Narevsky,
N.; Wright, G.; Courtade, T.; others. Design of energy-and cost-efficient massive MIMO arrays. Proceedings
of the IEEE 2016, 104, 586–606.
Sarkar, T.K.; Ji, Z.; Kim, K.; Medouri, A.; Salazar-Palma, M. A survey of various propagation models for
mobile communication. IEEE Antennas and propagation Magazine 2003, 45, 51–82.
Medbo, J.; Börner, K.; Haneda, K.; Hovinen, V.; Imai, T.; Järvelainen, J.; Jämsä, T.; Karttunen, A.; Kusume,
K.; Kyröläinen, J.; others. Channel modelling for the fifth generation mobile communications. Antennas
and Propagation (EuCAP), 2014 8th European Conference on. IEEE, 2014, pp. 219–223.
Ngo, H.Q.; Larsson, E.G.; Marzetta, T.L. Aspects of favorable propagation in massive MIMO. 2014 22nd
European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, 2014, pp. 76–80.
Migliore, M.D. Some Electromagnetic Limitations on the Number of Users in MU-MIMO Communication
Systems. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 2014, 13, 181–184.
Gao, X.; Edfors, O.; Rusek, F.; Tufvesson, F. Massive MIMO performance evaluation based on measured
propagation data. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 2015, 14, 3899–3911.
Lee, G.; Sung, Y.; Kountouris, M. On the performance of randomly directional beamforming between
line-of-sight and rich scattering channels. Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications
(SPAWC), 2015 IEEE 16th International Workshop on. IEEE, 2015, pp. 141–145.
Liu, L.; Matolak, D.W.; Tao, C.; Li, Y.; Ai, B.; Chen, H. Channel capacity investigation of a linear massive
MIMO system using spherical wave model in LOS scenarios. Science China Information Sciences 2016,
59, 1–15.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
19 of 20
Chandhar, P.; Danev, D.; Larsson, E.G. On ergodic rates and optimal array geometry in line-of-sight
massive MIMO. Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2016 IEEE 17th
International Workshop on. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–6.
Liu, L.; Matolak, D.W.; Tao, C.; Lu, Y.; Ai, B.; Chen, H. Geometry based large scale attenuation over linear
massive MIMO systems. Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2016 10th European Conference on. IEEE,
2016, pp. 1–5.
Zhou, Z.; Gao, X.; Fang, J.; Chen, Z. Spherical wave channel and analysis for large linear array in LoS
conditions. Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2015 IEEE. IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–6.
Chen, C.M.; Volskiy, V.; Chiumento, A.; Van der Perre, L.; Vandenbosch, G.A.; Pollin, S. Exploration of
User Separation Capabilities by Distributed Large Antenna Arrays. Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps),
2016 IEEE. IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–6.
Liu, L.; Matolak, D.W.; Tao, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, H. The Benefits of Large-Scale Attenuation over the Antenna
Array in Massive MIMO Systems. Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), 2016 IEEE 84th. IEEE,
2016, pp. 1–5.
Masouros, C.; Matthaiou, M. Space-constrained massive MIMO: Hitting the wall of favorable propagation.
IEEE Communications Letters 2015, 19, 771–774.
Golub, G.H.; Van Loan, C.F. Matrix computations; Vol. 3, JHU Press, 2012.
Tsoulos, G. MIMO system technology for wireless communications; CRC press, 2006.
Artés, H.; Seethaler, D.; Hlawatsch, F. Efficient detection algorithms for MIMO channels: A geometrical
approach to approximate ML detection. IEEE transactions on signal processing 2003, 51, 2808–2820.
Maurer, J.; Matz, G.; Seethaler, D. Low-complexity and full-diversity MIMO detection based on condition
number thresholding. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007. ICASSP 2007. IEEE International
Conference on. IEEE, 2007, Vol. 3, pp. III–61.
Mohammed, S.K.; Viterbo, E.; Hong, Y.; Chockalingam, A. MIMO precoding with X-and Y-codes. IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory 2011, 57, 3542–3566.
Yang, H.; Marzetta, T.L. Performance of conjugate and zero-forcing beamforming in large-scale antenna
systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2013, 31, 172–179.
Mailloux, R.J. Phased array antenna handbook; Vol. 2, Artech House Boston, 2005.
Donelli, M.; Caorsi, S.; DeNatale, F.; Pastorino, M.; Massa, A. Linear antenna synthesis with a hybrid
genetic algorithm. Progress In Electromagnetics Research 2004, 49, 1–22.
Massa, A.; Donelli, M.; De Natale, F.G.; Caorsi, S.; Lommi, A. Planar antenna array control with genetic
algorithms and adaptive array theory. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2004, 52, 2919–2924.
Liu, Y.; Nie, Z.; Liu, Q.H. Reducing the number of elements in a linear antenna array by the matrix pencil
method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2008, 56, 2955–2962.
Oliveri, G.; Donelli, M.; Massa, A. Linear array thinning exploiting almost difference sets. IEEE Transactions
on Antennas and Propagation 2009, 57, 3800–3812.
Poli, L.; Rocca, P.; Salucci, M.; Massa, A. Reconfigurable thinning for the adaptive control of linear arrays.
IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2013, 61, 5068–5077.
Oliveri, G.; Bekele, E.T.; Robol, F.; Massa, A. Sparsening conformal arrays through a versatile BCS-based
method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2014, 62, 1681–1689.
Bucci, O.M.; Perna, S.; Pinchera, D. Synthesis of isophoric sparse arrays allowing zoomable beams
and arbitrary coverage in satellite communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2015,
63, 1445–1457.
D’Urso, M.; Prisco, G.; Tumolo, R.M. Maximally Sparse, Steerable, and Nonsuperdirective Array Antennas
via Convex Optimizations. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2016, 64, 3840–3849.
Pinchera, D.; Migliore, M.D.; Lucido, M.; Schettino, F.; Panariello, G. A Compressive-Sensing Inspired
Alternate Projection Algorithm for Sparse Array Synthesis. Electronics 2016, 6, 3.
Rocca, P.; Oliveri, G.; Mailloux, R.J.; Massa, A. Unconventional phased array architectures and design
methodologies—A review. Proceedings of the IEEE 2016, 104, 544–560.
Pinchera, D.; Migliore, M.D. Comparison guidelines and benchmark procedure for sparse array synthesis.
Progress In Electromagnetics Research M 2016, 52, 129–139.
Electronics 2017, 6, 57
47.
48.
49.
20 of 20
Bucci, O.M.; Perna, S.; Pinchera, D. Interleaved Isophoric Sparse Arrays for the Radiation of Steerable
and Switchable Beams in Satellite Communications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 2017,
65, 1163–1173.
Nemirovskii, A.; Yudin, D.B.; Dawson, E.R. Problem complexity and method efficiency in optimization
1983.
Chen, C.J.; Wang, L.C. Performance analysis of scheduling in multiuser MIMO systems with zero-forcing
receivers. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 2007, 25.
c 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access
article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
(CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
| 7cs.IT
|
On Reachable Sets of Hidden CPS Sensor Attacks
arXiv:1710.06967v1 [cs.SY] 19 Oct 2017
Carlos Murguia and Justin Ruths
Abstract— For given system dynamics, observer structure,
and observer-based fault/attack detection procedure, we provide
mathematical tools – in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities
(LMIs) – for computing outer ellipsoidal bounds on the set
of estimation errors that attacks can induce while maintaining
the alarm rate of the detector equal to its attack-free false
alarm rate. We refer to these sets to as hidden reachable sets.
The obtained ellipsoidal bounds on hidden reachable sets quantify the attacker’s potential impact when it is constrained to
stay hidden from the detector. We provide tools for minimizing
the volume of these ellipsoidal bounds (minimizing thus the
reachable sets) by redesigning the observer gains. Simulation
results are presented to illustrate the performance of our tools.
I. I NTRODUCTION
There has recently been significant interest and work
in the broad area of security of cyber-physical systems
(CPS), see for example [1]-[8]. This topic investigates the
properties of conventional control systems in the presence
of adversarial disturbances. Control theory has shown great
ability to robustly deal with disturbances and uncertainties
[9]. However, adversarial attacks raise all-new issues due to
the aggressive and strategic nature of the disturbances that
attackers might inject into the system.
This paper focuses on attack detection and attack capabilities in CPSs. A majority of the work on attack detection leverages the established literature of fault detection
[1],[2],[10],[11]. A fault detection approach uses an estimator to forecast the evolution of the system dynamics. When
the residual (the difference between what is measured and
the estimation), or some function of the residual, is larger
than a predetermined threshold, an alarm is raised. Arguably
the most insidious attacks are those that occur without our
knowledge. Fault detectors impose limits on the attacker, if
the attacker aims to avoid being identified. Beyond retooling
these existing methods for the new attack detection context,
a fundamental question is: given a chosen fault detection
approach, how does this method constrain the influence of
an attacker? More specifically, what is an attacker able to
accomplish when a system employs certain fault detection
procedure?
Different methodologies exist for evaluating the impact
of attacks. Most of the existing work uses some measure
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF),
Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its National Cybersecurity R&D
Programme (Award No. NRF2014NCR-NCR001-40) and administered by
the National Cybersecurity R&D Directorate.
C. Murguia is with the Engineering Systems and Design Pillar, Singapore
University of Technology and Design. J. Ruths is with the Departments of
Mechanical and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at Dallas. emails:
[email protected] & [email protected].
of state (or state estimate) deviation. In [2], the authors
identify that if the attacker can take advantage of the zero
dynamics of a (noise-free) input-output system, it can modify
the system dynamics without reflecting its influence in the
residual variables. This type of attacks are stealthy to any
fault detector. A number of groups have studied the system
response when the attacks are constrained by the detector.
An important distinction between the collection of existing
work – and the work discussed here – is the definition of
how the attacker is constrained. We suggest the following
terminology. While the term stealthy attack is used very
broadly, we suggest that this refer to the zero-dynamics case,
as discussed in [2], because these attacks do not propagate
to the residual. Some work has investigated the case of
system response due to what we here call zero-alarm attacks,
i.e., attacks such that the detector threshold is never crossed
[12]-[16]. Because real systems (with noise) always have a
nonzero rate of false alarms raised by the detector, this attack
model yields a relatively obvious attack signature because
the alarms stop as soon as the attack starts. Other papers
identify attacks that mimic the false alarm rate, thus making
the alarm rate during the attack very close to the false alarm
rate before the attack started [17],[18]. These attacks we
call hidden attacks because although they do change the
distribution of the residual, these changes are hidden from
the way the detector evaluates the distribution. A majority of
this work uses state bounds or steady-state limits to quantify
the impact that an attacker can have. The exceptions to this
are [17],[18], which quantify the reachable set of states and
estimation errors when driven by the attack input.
This paper fuses several of these successful lines of
research with a more strict interpretation of hidden attacks.
The papers [17],[18] consider hidden attacks, however, they
permit the alarm rate to change by a small value; the attacker
capabilities that are derived are associated with this small
deviation rather than the full scope of allowable attacks.
Here, we fix the alarm rate exactly to study true hidden
attacks (i.e., alarm rate exactly equal to the false alarm
rate), and characterize the reachable sets on the estimation
error dynamics associated with this broader definition of
possible attack vectors. In this work, we characterize the
hidden reachable sets that the attacker can induce through
manipulation of sensor data. Because in general, it is quite
difficult to compute these sets exactly, for given system
dynamics and attack detection scheme, we derive ellipsoidal
bounds on the hidden reachable sets using Linear Matrix
Inequalities (LMIs) [19]. Then, we provide synthesis tools
for minimizing these bounds (minimizing thus the hidden
reachable set) by properly redesigning the detectors.
This builds off of our previous work in [18]. The strict
interpretation of hidden attacks requires more direct handling
of the effect of noise. To derive finite ellipsoidal bounds,
we introduce the notion of p-probable reachable sets, which
provides a nested set of ellipsoidal bounds based on the
probability of the driving random sequences taking certain
values. Because the derivation of the reachable set of states
from the reachable set of estimation errors is captured in [18]
(for a class of observer-based output feedback controllers),
and similar techniques can be used in this paper, we report
here only on estimation error reachable sets. Note that the
problem formulation in this paper, while seemingly similar,
requires an entirely different characterization from [18].
II. S YSTEM D ESCRIPTION & ATTACK D ETECTION
We study LTI stochastic systems of the form:
(
x(tk+1 ) = F x(tk ) + Gu(tk ) + v(tk ),
y(tk ) = Cx(tk ) + η(tk ),
(1)
with sampling time-instants tk , k ∈ N, state x ∈ Rn ,
measured output y ∈ Rm , control input u ∈ Rl , matrices F ,
G, and C of appropriate dimensions, and i.i.d. multivariate
zero-mean Gaussian noises v ∈ Rn and η ∈ Rm with
covariance matrices R1 ∈ Rn×n , R1 ≥ 0 and R2 ∈ Rm×m ,
R2 ≥ 0, respectively. The initial state x(t1 ) is assumed
to be a Gaussian random vector with covariance matrix
R0 ∈ Rn×n , R0 ≥ 0. The processes v(tk ), k ∈ N and
η(tk ), k ∈ N and the initial condition x(t1 ) are mutually
independent. It is assumed that (F, G) is stabilizable and
(F, C) is detectable. At the time-instants tk , k ∈ N, the
output of the process y(tk ) is sampled and transmitted over
a communication network. The received output ȳ(tk ) is used
to compute control actions u(tk ) which are sent back to the
process, see Fig. 1. The complete control-loop is assumed to
be performed instantaneously, i.e., the sampling, transmission, and arrival time-instants are supposed to be equal. In
this paper, we focus on attacks on sensor measurements. That
is, in between transmission and reception of sensor data, an
attacker may replace the signals coming from the sensors
to the controller, see Fig. 1. After each transmission and
reception, the attacked output ȳ takes the form:
ȳ(tk ) := y(tk ) + δ(tk ) = Cx(tk ) + η(tk ) + δ(tk ),
(2)
where δ(tk ) ∈ Rm denotes additive sensor attacks. Denote
xk := x(tk ), uk := u(tk ), vk := v(tk ), ȳk := ȳ(tk ), ηk :=
η(tk ), and δk := δ(tk ). Using this new notation, the attacked
system is written as follows
xk+1 = F xk + Guk + vk ,
(3)
ȳk = Cxk + ηk + δk .
A. Observer
In order to estimate the state of the process, we use the
following Luenberger observer [20]
(4)
x̂k+1 = F x̂k + Guk + L ȳk − C x̂k ,
with estimated state x̂k ∈ Rn , x̂1 = E[x(t1 )], where E[ · ]
denotes expectation, and observer gain matrix L ∈ Rn×m .
Define the estimation error ek := xk − x̂k . Given the system
Fig. 1.
Cyber-physical system under attacks on the sensor measurements.
dynamics (3) and the observer (4), the estimation error is
governed by the following difference equation
ek+1 = F − LC ek − Lηk − Lδk + vk .
(5)
The pair (F, C) is detectable; hence, the observer gain L can
be selected such that (F − LC) is Schur. Moreover, under
detectability of (F, C), if there are no attacks (i.e., δk = 0),
where 0 denotes the zero matrix of appropriate dimensions,
the covariance matrix Pk := E[ek eTk ] converges to steady
state in the sense that limk→∞ Pk = P exists, see [21]. For
a given L and δk = 0, it can be verified that the asymptotic
covariance matrix P = limk→∞ Pk is given by the solution
P of the following Lyapunov equation:
(F − LC)P (F − LC)T − P + R1 + LR2 LT = 0.
(6)
It is assumed that the system has reached steady state before
an attack occurs.
B. Residuals and Hypothesis Testing
In this manuscript, we characterize the effect that output
injection attacks can induce in the system with being detected
by fault detection techniques. The main idea behind fault
detection theory is the use of an estimator to forecast the
evolution of the system. If the difference between what
it is measured and the estimation is larger than expected,
there may be a fault in or attack on the system. Although
the notion of residuals and model-based detectors is now
routine in the fault detection literature, the primary focus
has been on detecting and isolating failures that have known
signatures in the degradation of measurement quality, i.e.,
faults with specific structures. Now, in the context of an
intelligent adversarial attacker for which there is no known
attack signature, new challenges arise to understand the effect
that an adaptive intruder can have on the system without
being detected. In this paper, we use the linear observer
introduced in the previous section as our estimator. Define
the residual sequence rk , k ∈ N, as
rk := ȳk − C x̂k = Cek + ηk + δk ,
(7)
which evolves according to the difference equation:
ek+1 = F − LC ek − Lηk − Lδk + vk ,
rk = Cek + ηk + δk .
If there are no attacks, the steady state mean of rk is
E[rk+1 ] = CE[ek+1 ] + E[ηk+1 ] = 0m×1 ,
and its asymptotic covariance matrix is given by
T
Σ := E[rk+1 rk+1
] = CP C T + R2 .
(8)
(9)
(10)
It is assumed that Σ ∈ Rm×m is positive definite. For this
residual, we identify two hypotheses to be tested: H0 the
normal mode (no attacks) and H1 the faulty mode (with
faults/attacks). Then, we have
E[rk ] = 0m×1 ,
E[rk ] 6= 0m×1 , or
H0 :
H1 :
T
E[rk rk ] = Σ,
E[rk rkT ] 6= Σ,
where 0m×1 denotes an m-dimensional vector composed of
zeros only. In this manuscript, we use the chi-squared procedure for examining the residual and subsequently detecting
attacks.
C. Distance Measure and Chi-squared Procedure
The input to any detection procedure is a distance measure
zk ∈ R, k ∈ N, i.e., a measure of how deviated the
estimator is from the sensor measurements. We employ
distance measures any time we test to distinguish between
H0 and H1 . The chi-squared test uses a quadratic form
on the residual as distance measure to test for substantial
variations in mean and variance of the error between the
measured output and the estimate. Consider the residual
sequence rk , (8), and its covariance matrix Σ, (10). The chisquared procedure is defined as follows.
Chi-squared procedure:
If zk := rkT Σ−1 rk > α, k̃ = k.
(11)
Design parameter: threshold α ∈ R>0 .
Output: alarm time(s) k̃.
Thus, the procedure is designed so that alarms are triggered if
zk exceeds the threshold α. The normalization by Σ−1 makes
setting the value of the threshold α system independent. This
quadratic expression leads to a sum of the squares of m
normally distributed random variables which implies that the
distance measure zk follows a chi-squared distribution with
m degrees of freedom, see, e.g., [22] for details.
D. False Alarms
The occurrence of an alarm in the chi-squared procedure
when there are no attacks to the CPS is referred to as a false
alarm. The threshold α must be selected to fulfill a desired
false alarm rate A∗ . Let A ∈ [0, 1] denote the false alarm
rate of the chi-squared procedure defined as the expected
proportion of observations which are false alarms, i.e., A :=
pr[zk ≥ α], where pr[·] denotes probability, see [23] and [24].
Proposition 1 [13]. Assume that there are no attacks on
the system and consider the chi-squared procedure (11)
with residual rk ∼ N (0, Σ) and threshold α ∈ R>0 . Let
−1
∗
(·, ·) denotes the
α = α∗ := 2P−1 ( m
2 , 1 − A ), where P
inverse regularized lower incomplete gamma function (see
[22]), then A = A∗ .
III. H IDDEN R EACHABLE S ETS
In this section, we provide tools for quantifying (for
given L) and minimizing (by selecting L) the impact of the
attack sequence δk on the estimation error ek when the chisquared procedure is used for attack detection. To quantify
the effect of attacks, we need to introduce some measure
of impact. However, because malicious adversaries may
launch any arbitrary attack, we need a measure which can
capture all possible trajectories that the attacker can induce
in the estimation error dynamics, given how it accesses the
dynamics (i.e., through residual variables by tampering with
sensor measurements). We propose to use the reachable set
of the attack sequence δk as our measure of impact. We
are interested in attacks that do not change the false alarm
rate of the detector A, i.e., Ā = A, where Ā denotes the
alarm rate under the attacker’s action. This class of attacks
is what we refer to as hidden attacks and the trajectories
that hidden attacks can induce in the system are referred to
as hidden reachable sets. In this section, we provide tools
based on Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMIs) for computing
outer ellipsoidal bounds on the hidden reachable sets induced
by the attack sequence δk given the system dynamics, the
chi-squared procedure, the noise, and the false alarm rate A.
A. Attack Model and Hidden Reachable Sets
We assume that the attacker has perfect knowledge of the
system dynamics, the observer, measurements, and detection
procedure (chi-squared). It is further assumed that all the
sensors can be compromised by the attacker at each time
step (the case where not all the sensors are attacked is left as
future work). By considering this strong, worst-case attacker,
we are able to construct an upper bound on the abilities of
the attacker. Consider the estimation error dynamics (8), the
residual sequence rk = Cek + ηk + δk , and the distance
measure
1
1
(12)
zk = ||Σ− 2 rk ||2 = ||Σ− 2 (Cek + ηk + δk )||2 ,
− 21
denotes the symmetric squared root matrix of
where Σ
Σ−1 . The set of feasible attack sequences that the opponent
can launch while satisfying Ā = A can be written as the
following constrained control problem on δk :
(
δk ∈ R
m
ek satisfies (8), and
1
pr[||Σ− 2 (Cek + ηk + δk )||2 > α ] = A,
)
,
(13)
for k ∈ N. We are interested in the error trajectories that
the attacker can induce in the system restricted to satisfy
(13). Note that, as long as Ā = A, the attacker may
induce any arbitrary random sequence δk . This and the fact
that vk and ηk are Gaussian (thus having infinite support)
imply that deterministic reachable sets induced by δk and
the noise sequences are generally unbounded. To overcome
this obstacle, we introduce the notion of p-probable hidden
1
reachable sets Rpα . Define ζk := Σ− 2 (Cek + ηk + δk ) and
note that the estimation error dynamics (8) can be written in
terms of ζk as:
1
ek+1 = F ek − LΣ 2 ζk + vk ,
(14)
1
ζk = Σ− 2 (Cek + ηk + δk ).
For given false alarm rate A and probability p ∈ (0, 1), the
p-probable hidden reachable set of the attack sequence δk in
(14), Rpα , is defined as the set of ek ∈ Rn , k ∈ N that can
be reached from the origin e1 = 0 due to the the attacker’s
action δk restricted to satisfy Ā = A and
2
pr[||ζk ||2 ≤ ζ̄p ] = pr[kvk k ≤ v̄p ] = p,
(15)
for some constants ζ̄p , v̄p ∈ R>0 , i.e.,
p
n e1 = 0,
. (16)
Rα := ek ∈ R
ek , δk , vk satisfy (13)-(15),
By restricting the probabilities in (15), we are delimiting the
support of the attack and noise sequences to compact sets.
Then, the p-probable hidden reachable sets correspond to the
trajectories of the system when the driving random sequences
are restricted to satisfy Ā = A and (15). For delimited vk and
δk , we can characterize reachable sets using deterministic
tools. In general, it is analytically intractable to compute
Rpα exactly. Instead, using LMIs, for some positive definite
matrix Pαp ∈ Rn×n , we derive outer ellipsoidal bounds of
the form Eαp := {ek ∈ Rn |eTk Pαp ek ≤ 1} containing Rpα .
Remark 1 Note, from (14), that if for some k = k ∗ , ek∗ 6=
0 and ρ[F ] > 1, where ρ[·] denotes spectral radius, then
||ek || diverges to infinity as k → ∞ for any non-stabilizing
ζk . That is, Rpα is unbounded if the system is open-loop
unstable. If ρ[F ] ≤ 1, then ||ek || may or may not diverge to
infinity depending on algebraic and geometric multiplicities
of the eigenvalues with unit modulus of F (a known fact from
stability of LTI systems), see [21] for details.
Given Remark 1, in what follows, we consider open-loop
stable systems (ρ[F ] < 1). The following result is used to
compute the ellipsoidal bounds Eαp .
Lemma 1 [25] Let ξk ∈ Rn , ξ1 = 0, Vk := ξkT Pξk , for
some positive definite matrix P ∈ Rn×n , and ωkT ωk ≤ ω̄,
ω̄ ∈ R>0 . If there exists a constant b ∈ (0, 1) such that
1−b T
Vk+1 − bVk −
ωk ωk ≤ 0, ∀ k ∈ N,
(17)
ω̄
T
then, Vk = ξk Pξk ≤ 1.
B. Case 1: p ∈ [0, 1 − A]
Because the attack sequence is restricted to satisfy (13),
we start computing the ellipsoidal bounds corresponding to
p = 1 − A, i.e., Eα1−A . It is easy to verify using Lemma 1
that Eαp ⊆ Eα1−A for p ∈ [0, 1 − A] because ζ̄p ≤ ζ̄1−A = α
and v̄p ≤ v̄1−A in (15); i.e., all p-probable ellipsoidal bounds
for p ∈ [0, 1 − A] lie within the 1 − A-probable ellipsoidal
bound. It follows that Rpe ⊆ Eα1−A for p ∈ [0, 1−A], i.e., for
p in this interval, we only need to compute the ellipsoidal
bound corresponding to p = 1−A. Characterizing p-probable
sets for small p values is of little interest because they do not
provide a informative bound on system trajectories (since the
smaller p is, the more trajectories lie outside the p-probable
ellipsoidal bound). We work with the data available in this
setting, namely the number of alarms raised by the detector,
to bound the most informative p = 1 − A probable reachable
set; in Case 2, we extend these results for larger p values.
Theorem 1 For given system matrix F , observer gain L,
residual covariance matrix Σ, and false alarm rate A,
consider the set R1−A
in (16). If there exists a positive
α
definite matrix P ∈ Rn×n and b ∈ (0, 1) satisfying the
following matrix inequality:
bP
FTP
0
0
00
1
PF
P
P −PLΣ 2 0 0
1−b
0
0
0 0
P
≥ 0;
ω̄ I
(18)
1
1−b
0 −Σ 2 LT P 0
0 0
ω̄ I
0
0
0
0
I 0
0
0
0
0
0I
1−A
1−A
for ω̄ = α + v̄1−A ; then, Rα
⊆ Eα
with Pα1−A = P,
i.e., the (1 − A)-probable hidden reachable set is contained
in the ellipsoid Eα1−A = {ek ∈ Rn |eTk Pα1−A ek ≤ 1}.
Proof : For a positive definite matrix P ∈ Rn×n , consider
the function Vk := eTk Pek , then, from (16), inequality (17)
takes the form:
1
bP − F T PF
F T PLΣ 2
−F T P
1
1
1
1
T
2
2 Σ 2 LT P ϑk
= −ϑTk Σ 2 LT PF 1−b
ω̄ I − Σ L1 PLΣ
1−b
2
−PF
PLΣ
ω̄ I − P
T
=: −ϑk Qe ϑk ≤ 0,
where ϑ := (eTk , ζkT , vkT )T . The above inequality is satisfied
if and only if Qe ≥ 0. Matrix Qe can be written as the
Schur complement of a higher dimensional matrix Q′e ; hence,
Qe ≥ 0 ↔ Q′e ≥ 0, i.e.,
Qe ≥ 0 ↔
bP
0
0
F T P 00
1
0 1−b I
0 −Σ 2 LT P 00
ω̄
1−b
0
(19)
I
P
00
0
′
≥ 0.
ω̄
Qe :=
1
2
P
00
PF −PLΣ P
0
0
0
0
I 0
0
0
0
0
0I
Finally, inequality (18) follows from (19) by a simple reordering of rows and columns.The result follows now from
Lemma 1 by taking Pα1−A = P and ω̄ = α + v̄1−A .
The result in Theorem 1 provides a tool for computing
ellipsoidal bounds on R1−A
. To make the bounds most
α
useful, we next construct ellipsoids with minimal volume,
i.e., the tightest possible ellipsoid bounding R1−A
. In this
α
case, we have to minimize det P −1 subject to (18) (because
det P −1 is proportional to the volume of eTk Pek = 1). This
is formally stated in the following corollary of Theorem 1,
see [19] for further details.
Corollary 1 For given matrices (F, L, Σ), false alarm rate
A, and b ∈ (0, 1), the solution P of the following convex
optimization:
(
minP − log det P,
(20)
s.t. P > 0 and (18),
for ω̄ = α + v̄1−A , minimizes the volume of the ellipsoid
Eα1−A (with Pα1−A = P) bounding R1−A
.
α
See [26] for an example of how to solve (26) using
YALMIP.
As we now move toward redesigning L to minimize
the ellipsoids, we note that as ||L|| → 0, the volume of
Eα1−A goes to zero because the attack-dependent term in
1
(14), LΣ 2 ζk , vanishes. In other words, without any other
considered criteria, the observer gain leading to the minimum
volume ellipsoid is trivially given by L = 0. While this is
effective at eliminating the impact of the attacker, it implies
that we discard the observer altogether and, therefore, forfeit
any ability to build a reliable estimate of the system state.
If we impose a performance criteria that the observer must
satisfy in the attack-free case (e.g., convergence speed, noiseoutput gain, and minimum asymptotic variance), it has to be
added into the minimization problem (26) so as to minimize
the volume of Eα1−A while still achieving the observer
performance in the attack-free case. For completeness, in
the following proposition, we provide an LMI criteria for
ensuring that the H∞ gain from the noise to the residual rk
in (8) is less than or equal to some γ ∈ R>0 . Then, using
this criteria and Theorem 1, we provide a synthesis tool for
minimizing the volume of Eα1−A while ensuring a desired
H∞ performance in the attack-free case.
Proposition 2 For given matrices (F, C, L), if there exist a
positive definite matrix P ∈ Rn×n and constant γ ∈ R>0
satisfying the following matrix inequality:
P
0
0 (F − LC)T P C T
0
γ2I 0
−LT P
I
2
0
0 γ I
P
0
≥ 0, (21)
P(F − LC) −PL P
P
0
C
I
0
0
I
then, the H∞ gain from the noise νk := (ηkT , vkT )T to the
residual rk = Cek + ηk of the estimation error dynamics (8)
is less than or equal to γ.
P) bounding R1−A
and guarantees that the H∞ gain from
α
the noise νk = (ηkT , vkT )T to the residual rk of (8) is less
than or equal to γ in the attack-free case.
Proof : This follows from Theorem 1, Proposition 2, and the
linearizing change of variables M = PL.
C. Case 2: p ∈ (1 − A, 1]
Note that, for p ∈ (1 − A, 1], ζ̄p > ζ̄1−A = α according
2
to (15). Then, we can write ζ̄p = α + ǫp and pr[kζk k ≤
α + ǫp ] = 1 − A + ap, for some ǫp ∈ (0, ∞) and ap ∈ (0, A].
To be able to compute ellipsoidal bounds, the constant ǫp
corresponding to a given probability 1−A+ap is required. If
ǫp is available, we can restrict ζk to compact sets as in Case 1.
Note, however, that the distribution of the attack sequence
δk (and thus the one of ζk ) is generally unknown. Actually,
the attacker may induce any arbitrary (and possibly) nonstationary random sequence ζk in (14) as long as Ā = A.
Nevertheless, we can obtain bounds on ǫp using Markov’s
inequality [22] to link the statistical properties of ζk with ǫp .
This is stated in the following proposition.
Proposition 3 Denote Mk := E[ζk ζkT ] and µk := E[ζk ].
For given false alarm rate A, probability p = 1 − A + ap ,
and ap ∈ (0, A), the following is satisfied:
2
(23a)
pr[kζk k ≤ α + ǫp ] ∈ [1 − A + ap , 1],
tr[Mk ] + µTk µk
− α.
for all ǫp ≥ ǫp :=
A − ap
(23b)
2
The proof of Proposition 2 is omitted here due to the page
limit. However, this is a standard result and details about
the proof can be found in, e.g., [9] and references therein.
In the following corollary of Theorem 1 and Proposition 2,
we formulate the optimization problem for designing the
observer gain L such that the volume of the ellipsoid Eα1−A
is minimized and a desired H∞ performance is achieved in
the attack-free case.
Corollary 2 For given system matrices (F, C), residual
covariance matrix Σ, false alarm rate A, b ∈ (0, 1), and
γ ∈ R>0 , if there exist matrices P ∈ Rn×n and M ∈ Rn×m
solution to the following convex optimization:
minP,M − log det P,
bP F T P
0
0
00
1
PF
P
P −M Σ 2 0 0
1−b
0
P
I
0
0 0
ω̄
s.t.
P
>
0,
≥ 0, and
1
T
1−b
0 −Σ 2 M
0
I 0 0
ω̄
0
0
0
0
I0
0
0
0
0
0
I
P
0
0 F T P − CT M T CT
2
T
0
γ I 0
−M
I
0
0 γ2I
P
0
≥ 0,
PF
−
M
C
−M
P
P
0
C
I
0
0
I
(22)
for ω̄ = α + v̄1−A ; then, the observer gain L = P −1 M
minimizes the volume of the ellipsoid Eα1−A (with Pα1−A =
Proof : The probability pr[kζk k ≤ α + ǫp ] can be written as
2
2
pr[kζk k ≤ α + ǫp ] = 1 − pr[kζk k > α + ǫp ]. Then, using
Markov’s inequality [22], we can write the following
2
E[kζk k ]
pr[kζk k2 > α + ǫp ] = 1 − pr[kζk k2 ≤ α + ǫp ] ≤
.
α + ǫp
Therefore, if ǫp satisfies E[kζk k2 ]/(α + ǫp ) ≤ A − ap , then
2
2
pr[kζk k > α+ǫp ] ≤ A−ap and hence pr[kζk k ≤ α+ǫp ] ∈
[1 − A + ap , 1]. The expectation of the quadratic form ζkT ζk
2
is given by E[kζk k ] = E[ζkT ζk ] = tr[Mk ] + µTk µk [22];
2
then, E[kζk k ]/(α + ǫp ) ≤ A − ap is satisfied for all ǫp ≥ ǫp
with ǫp as defined in (23b), and the assertion follows.
Using Proposition 3, for given false alarm rate A and
probability p = 1 − A + ap ∈ (1 − A, 1], ap ∈ (0, A),
we can characterize p-probable hidden reachable sets, R̃pα ,
2
by using the lower bounds on pr[kζk k ≤ α + ǫp ] and ǫp in
(23). Specifically, for p > 1 − A, the set R̃pα of the sequence
δk is defined as the set of ek ∈ Rn that can be reached from
e1 = 0 restricted to satisfy Ā = A and
pr[kvk k2 ≤ v̄p ] = 1 − A + ap and
(24)
ǫp = ǫp → pr[kζk k2 ≤ α + ǫp ] ∈ [1 − A + ap , 1],
for some constant v̄p ∈ R>0 and ǫp as defined in (24), i.e.,
R̃pα :=
e k ∈ Rn
e1 = 0,
ek , ζk , vk , satisfy (13)-(14),(24),
. (25)
Remark 2 For a p-probable reachable set, we select ap such
that p = 1 − A + ap , then determine ǫp using (23b). Note
that, because the attacker can induce an attack sequence with
Fig. 2.
1−A
Ellipsoid Eα
for different values of false alarm rate A.
Fig. 3. The improvement in the (1 − A)-probable hidden reachable set
1−A
ellipsoidal bound Eα
, for A = 0.01, through application of Corollary 2
to design the optimal observer gain.
arbitrarily large covariance Mk and mean µk , the lower
bound on ǫp , ǫp , in (23b) can be made arbitrarily large for
any ap . Therefore, if δk (and thus ζk ) is only restricted to
satisfy Ā = A, the opponent can induce arbitrarily large
reachable sets R̃pα .
Remark 2 implies that if we only monitor the alarms raised
by the detector, the attacker can inject arbitrarily large signals
in the residual sequence rk without changing the alarm rate.
Consequently, the sets R̃pα can be made arbitrarily large for
arbitrarily small ap . If we place additional assumptions on
the attacker, namely that the mean and covariance of the
attack sequence ζk are finite, the reachable sets will be
bounded by Proposition 3. In particular, if we assume the
attacker maintains the mean and covariance of the attack-free
scenario, i.e., E[ζk ] = µk = 0 and E[ζk ζkT ] = Mk = Im ,
m
− α. Hence, if in addition to imposing Ā =
then ǫp = A−a
p
A, the attack is restricted to keep the statistical properties of
ζk in the attack-free case, i.e., µk = 0 and Mk = Im , the
reachable sets R̃pα are bounded for each ap ∈ (0, A) (because
ǫp is bounded); and therefore, in this case, we can compute
ellipsoidal bounds on R̃pα . This additional assumption could
be enforced by adding detectors that identify anomalies in
the sample mean and sample covariance of the residual. Such
detectors would force the attacker to avoid arbitrarily large
attack values in order to avoid detection by these additional
mean and covariance detectors.
As before, we characterize, for some positive definite
matrix P̃αp ∈ Rn×n , outer ellipsoidal bounds of the form
Ẽαp := {ek ∈ Rn |eTk P̃αp ek ≤ 1} containing R̃pα . The results
corresponding to Theorem 1, and Corollary 1 for Case 1 are
stated in the following corollary.
Corollary 3 For given false alarm rate A, probability p =
m
− α,
1 − A + ap , ap ∈ (0, A), threshold ǫp = ǫp = A−a
p
p
and matrices (F, L, Σ), consider the set R̃α in (25). Then,
for given b ∈ (0, 1), if there exists a matrix P ∈ Rn×n
solution of the following convex optimization:
(
minP − log det P,
(26)
s.t. P > 0 and (18),
for ω̄ = α + ǫp + v̄p ; then, R̃pα ⊆ Ẽαp (with P̃αp = P) and Ẽαp
has minimum volume, i.e., the p-probable hidden reachable
set R̃pα is contained in the minimum volume ellipsoid Eαp =
{ek ∈ Rn |eTk Pαp ek ≤ 1}.
p
Fig. 4. Ellipsoidal bound Ẽα
for different values of ap obtained using
Corollary 3.
A result for redesigning the observer gain for minimizing
the volume of the above ellipsoids, as in Corollary 2 for Case
1, can be stated in a similar manner as the corollary above;
however, this is omitted here due to the page limit.
IV. S IMULATION E XPERIMENTS
Consider the closed-loop system (3)-(4) with matrices:
0.84 0.23
0.07
F
=
,
G
=
,C= 10 ,
−0.47 0.12
0.23
1.16
0.45 −0.11
L=
, R1 =
,
(27)
−0.69
−0.11 0.45
R = 1 0 , R = 1, Σ = 3.26.
0
2
01
We start with Case 1. Using Proposition 2, the observer
gain L is designed such that the H∞ gain from the noise
to the residual rk of (8) is less than or equal to γ =
1.86 in the attack-free case. Consider the false alarm rates
A = {0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20} and the corresponding α =
{6.63, 3.84, 2.70, 1.64}, obtained using Proposition 1. The
2
thresholds v̄1−A in (15) are computed such that pr[kvk k ≤
v̄1−A ] = 1−A. Because the entries on the diagonal of R1 are
2
equal and vk ∼ N (0, R1 ), the random sequence kvk k , k ∈
N follows a gamma distribution, Γ(κ, θ), with shape parameter κ = 1 and scale parameter θ = 0.90, see [22]. It follows
that, for these A, v̄1−A = {4.14, 2.69, 2.07, 1.44}. For these
values of v̄1−A and α, in Figure 2, we depict the ellipsoidal
bounds Eα1−A on the (1 − A)-probable hidden reachable sets
obtained using Theorem 1 and Corollary 1. Next, for
R1−A
α
A = 0.01, using Corollary 2, we redesign the observer gain
L to minimize the volume of Eα1−A while maintaining the
H∞ performance below γ = 1.86. The obtained optimal
ellipsoidal bound, Eα1−A , is depicted in Figure 3 for the
optimal observer gain L = (0.1272, −0.0160)T . For Case
2, let A = 0.05, p = 1 − A + ap , ap = {0.01, 0.03},
and L as in (27); then, the corresponding v̄p are v̄p =
{2.8970, 3.5208} and the ǫp , computed through (23), are
given by ǫp = {21.16, 46.16}. In Figure 4, we show the
ellipsoidal bounds Ẽαp on the reachable sets R̃pα obtained
using Corollary 3.
Remark 3 Many numerical results considering hidden attacks with different distributions are presented in the accompanying paper [27] (Section 4). Also, extensive Monte-Carlo
simulations showing the tightness of the bounds presented
here are given in [27].
V. C ONCLUSION
In this paper, for a class of discrete-time LTI systems
subject to sensor/actuator noise, we have provided tools for
quantifying and minimizing the negative impact of sensor
attacks on the estimation error dynamics performance given
how the opponent accesses the dynamics (i.e., through the
controller by tampering with sensor measurements). We
have proposed to use the reachable set as a measure of
the impact of an attack given a chosen detection method.
For given system dynamics and attack detection scheme,
we have derived ellipsoidal bounds on these reachable sets
using LMIs. Then, we have provided synthesis tools for
minimizing these bounds (minimizing thus the reachable
sets) by properly redesigning the detectors.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Cárdenas, S. Amin, Z. Lin, Y. Huang, C. Huang, and S. Sastry, “Attacks against process control systems: Risk assessment, detection, and
response,” in Proceedings of the 6th ACM Symposium on Information,
Computer and Communications Security, 2011, pp. 355–366.
[2] F. Pasqualetti, F. Dorfler, and F. Bullo, “Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic
Control, vol. 58, pp. 2715–2729, 2013.
[3] Y. Mo, E. Garone, A. Casavola, and B. Sinopoli, “False data injection
attacks against state estimation in wireless sensor networks,” in Decision and Control (CDC), 2010 49th IEEE Conference on, 2010, pp.
5967–5972.
[4] C. Kwon, W. Liu, and I. Hwang, “Security analysis for cyber-physical
systems against stealthy deception attacks,” in American Control
Conference (ACC), 2013, 2013, pp. 3344–3349.
[5] F. Miao, Q. Zhu, M. Pajic, and G. J. Pappas, “Coding sensor outputs
for injection attacks detection,” in Decision and Control (CDC), 2014
IEEE 53rd Annual Conference on, 2014, pp. 5776–5781.
[6] C. M. Ahmed, C. Murguia, and J. Ruths, “Model-based attack detection scheme for smart water distribution networks,” in Proceedings of
the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications
Security, ser. ASIA CCS ’17, 2017, pp. 101–113.
[7] E. Rothstein Morris, C. Murguia, and M. Ochoa, “Design-time quantification of integrity in cyber-physical-systems,” in Proceedings of
the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Workshop on Programming Languages and
Analysis for Security, (accepted), 2017.
[8] C. Z. Bai, F. Pasqualetti, and V. Gupta, “Security in stochastic
control systems: Fundamental limitations and performance bounds,”
in American Control Conference (ACC), 2015, 2015, pp. 195–200.
[9] C. Scherer and S. Weiland, Linear Matrix Inequalities in Control. The
Netherlands: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
[10] J. Chen and R. J. Patton, Robust Model-based Fault Diagnosis for
Dynamic Systems. Norwell, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers,
1999.
[11] E. Kyriakides and M. M. Polycarpou, Eds., Intelligent Monitoring,
Control, and Security of Critical Infrastructure Systems, ser. Studies
in Computational Intelligence. Springer, 2015, vol. 565.
[12] C. Murguia and J. Ruths, “Characterization of a cusum model-based
sensor attack detector,” in proceedings of the 55th IEEE Conference
on Decision and Control (CDC), 2016.
[13] ——, “Cusum and chi-squared attack detection of compromised
sensors,” in proceedings of the IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems
and Control (MSC), 2016.
[14] J. Giraldo, A. Cardenas, and N. Quijano, “Integrity attacks on realtime pricing in smart grids: Impact and countermeasures,” IEEE
Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. PP, 2016.
[15] A. Cardenas, S. Amin, B. Sinopoli, A. Giani, A. Perrig, and S. Sastry,
“Challenges for securing cyber physical systems,” in Workshop on
Future Directions in Cyber-physical Systems Security, 2009.
[16] Z. Guo, D. Shi, K. H. Johansson, and L. Shi, “Optimal Linear CyberAttack on Remote State Estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Control
of Network Systems, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–10, 2016.
[17] Y. Mo and B. Sinopoli, “On the performance degradation of cyberphysical systems under stealthy integrity attacks,” IEEE Transactions
on Automatic Control, vol. 61, pp. 2618–2624, 2016.
[18] C. Murguia, N. van de Wouw, and J. Ruths, “Reachable sets of hidden
cps sensor attacks: Analysis and synthesis tools,” in proceedings of the
IFAC World Congress, 2016.
[19] S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix
Inequalities in System and Control Theory, ser. Studies in Applied
Mathematics. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1994, vol. 15.
[20] D. Luenberger, Introduction to dynamic systems : theory, models, and
applications. New York: Wiley, 1979.
[21] K. J. Aström and B. Wittenmark, Computer-controlled Systems (3rd
Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1997.
[22] M. Ross, Introduction to Probability Models, Ninth Edition. Orlando,
FL, USA: Academic Press, Inc., 2006.
[23] C. van Dobben de Bruyn, Cumulative sum tests : theory and practice.
London : Griffin, 1968.
[24] B. Adams, W. Woodall, and C. Lowry, “The use (and misuse) of false
alarm probabilities in control chart design,” Frontiers in Statistical
Quality Control 4, pp. 155–168, 1992.
[25] N. D. That, P. T. Nam, and Q. P. Ha, “Reachable set bounding for
linear discrete-time systems with delays and bounded disturbances,”
Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 157, pp. 96–
107, 2013.
[26] J. Lofberg, “Yalmip : a toolbox for modeling and optimization in
matlab,” in Computer Aided Control Systems Design, 2004 IEEE
International Symposium on, 2004, pp. 284–289.
[27] N. Hashemil, C. Murguia, and J. Ruths, “A comparison of stealthy
sensor attacks on control systems,” in eprint arXiv (submitted to
ACC2018), 2017.
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:1710.11354v1 [cs.CV] 31 Oct 2017
Spatio-temporal interaction model for crowd video analysis
Neha Bhargava
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
India
Subhasis Chaudhuri
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
India
[email protected]
[email protected]
Abstract
scopic modeling methods. They also present a critical survey on crowd event detection. Julio et al. cover
various vision techniques applicable to crowd analysis such as tracking, density estimation, and computer
simulation [3]. Zhan et al. discuss various vision based
techniques used in crowd analysis. They also discuss
crowd analysis from the perspective of different disciplines − psychology, sociology and computer graphics [4]. At the top level, the techniques used in crowd
motion analysis can be divided into two major classes
− holistic and particle based. The holistic methods
consider crowd as a single entity and analyze the overall behavior. These methods fail to provide much insight at an individual or intermediate level. On the
other hand, particle based methods consider crowd as
a collection of individuals. But their performance degrades with the increase in crowd density due to occlusion and tracking problems. The analysis at intermediate level i.e. at group level might provide more
insights at individual and overall levels.
We present an unsupervised approach to analyze crowd
at various levels of granularity − individual, group and
collective. We also propose a motion model to represent
the collective motion of the crowd. The model captures
the spatio-temporal interaction pattern of the crowd from
the trajectory data captured over a time period. Furthermore, we also propose an effective group detection algorithm
that utilizes the eigenvectors of the interaction matrix of
the model. We also show that the eigenvalues of the interaction matrix characterize various group activities such as
being stationary, walking, splitting and approaching. The
algorithm is also extended trivially to recognize individual
activity. Finally, we discover the overall crowd behavior
by classifying a crowd video in one of the eight categories.
Since the crowd behavior is determined by its constituent
groups, we demonstrate the usefulness of group level features during classification. Extensive experimentation on
various datasets demonstrates a superlative performance of
our algorithms over the state-of-the-art methods.
We believe that a moderately dense crowd consists
of various groups which form a primary entity of a
crowd [6, 7] whereas a highly dense crowd can be considered to form a single group and a highly sparse
crowd might have groups with cardinality of one. Together, they guide the overall behavior of the crowd
and individually influence the actions of the members.
Therefore, group level analysis and hence group detection becomes important in crowd analysis. We define a group as a set of individuals (agents) having
some sort of interactions e.g. the group members are
walking together. Spatial proximity is also necessary
to form a group; if there are agents with a similar motion pattern but are far away from each other, they do
not form a group as per our definition. Each group
has its own set of goals that leads to various interaction patterns among the members of the group. The
collective behavior of these constituent groups identifies the global crowd behavior which can vary from
a highly structured to a completely unstructured pat-
Understanding human behavior at an individual
level, at a group level and at a crowd level in different scenarios has always attracted the researchers.
The variability and complexity in the behavior make
it a highly challenging task. However, this decade is
witnessing a huge interest of researchers in the area
of crowd motion analysis due to its various applications in surveillance, safety, public place management,
hazard prevention, and virtual environments. This interest has resulted in many interesting papers in the
area. We are aware of at least four survey papers on
the subject of crowd analysis that indicate the amount
of attention, it has drawn in this and the previous
decade [1],[2],[3],[4]. The latest survey paper [1] by
Chang et al. encapsulates the recent works published
after 2009, covering topics of motion pattern segmentation, crowd behavior and anomaly detection. Thida
et al. [2] provide a review on macroscopic and micro1
(a) Uniform crowd
(d) Walking
(b) Mixed crowd
(c) Stationary group
(e) Approaching
(f) Splitting
Figure 1: (a) and (b) give examples of structured and unstructured crowd. Output of the proposed algorithm: (c) - (f) show
groups with different activities: Standing (St), Walking (W), Splitting (Sp) and Approaching (A). Tracklets for some of the
agents over past few frames are also shown. Each color represents a detected group (Best viewed in color). The videos are
from BEHAVE [5] and CUHK [6] datasets.
tern. In case of a structured crowd, for example −
marching of soldiers, all groups are in coordination
and share the same goal (see Fig.1a); whereas in an
unstructured crowd, for example − at railway station
or at a shopping complex, there are multiple groups
with different goals (see Fig.1b). We are interested in
understanding these different types of crowd behaviors at various levels by exploiting motion information
of individuals. The paper makes the following contributions:
strates the effectiveness of the algorithm.
3. We also demonstrate how the activities can be
classified at three different levels − at atomic (individual) level, at group level and at crowd level.
The eigenvalues of the interaction matrix characterize various group and individual activities
− Fig 1c-1f show examples of activities at group
level. At crowd level, we employ group level features to identify the behavior of the crowd. We
classify the crowd videos in one of the 8 categories as defined by [6] and demonstrate its performance in terms of classification accuracy.
1. A framework is proposed to model the collective
motion of the crowd by a first order dynamical
system. The model captures the interaction patterns among the individuals. Although, the proposed model does not capture any possible nonlinear relations, its usefulness for short-term analysis has been verified experimentally. We also
provide an optimization formulation for the estimation of the interaction matrix under the constraints of spatial proximity, temporal continuity
and sparsity of inter-agent relationship.
The remaining part of the paper is organized as follows. Next section reviews the related literature. Section 2 explains the proposed mathematical formulation followed by group detection algorithm in Section
3. Detection of group activity and atomic activity is
discussed in Section 4. We look at crowd video classification in Section 5. The experimental results are presented in Section 6 followed by conclusions in Section
7.
2. Since the interaction matrix is learned from the
trajectory data, it captures the spatio-temporal
patterns present among the agents. We observe
that the eigenvectors of the interaction matrix reflect the spatio-temporal patterns. Thus, we propose a spectral clustering [8] based algorithm to
identify the groups present in the scene. Extensive experimentation on various datasets demon-
1. Related Work
There are numerous research papers in the challenging and interesting area of crowd behavior
analysis.
There are several holistic approaches
(e.g. [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]) as well as particle based
algorithms (e.g. [14], [15], [7], [16], [17]) in the literature. Holistic methods analyze crowd as a single en2
2. Mathematical Formulation
tity and ignore individuals or groups. In many papers,
a dense crowd is considered analogous to fluid and
hence concepts from fluid mechanics are applied for
analysis. Mehran et al. in [9] present streakline representation of crowd flow for behavior analysis. Solmaz
et al. recognize crowd behaviors such as bottlenecks,
fountainheads, lanes, arches and blocks through stability analysis of a dynamical system [10]. Benabbas et
al. detect motion patterns and events in the crowded
scenes by modeling motion and velocity at each spatial location [11]. In [12], Lin et al. find a coherent motion regions in the video by generating thermal energy
field.
We define a group as a set of agents having spatial proximity and some sort of interaction. In general, such interactions are complex and non-linear in
nature. We approximate these interactions locally in
time by a first order dynamical model. Note that we
refer by agent an individual entity (represented by a
point to be tracked) in the crowd.
2.1. Proposed Interaction Model
We model the collective relationship among the
agents by a first order affine system. Our hypothesis is
based on the intuition that each agent takes into consideration (a) the movement of other agents present
nearby and (b) her/his desired goal, while taking the
next step. To capture these two intuitions, our model
relates the next position of each agent to the current
positions of all the agents including herself/himself.
Let x(k ) = [ x1 (k), x2 (k), ..., x N (k )] T , then
The agent based approaches analyze each individual or group to discover the global behavior. Solera
et al. propose correlation clustering based group detection which uses socially constrained features. Shao
et al. introduce a collective transition prior in [6] and
represent each group by a Markov chain. They define
interesting group descriptors which proved to be useful in group state analysis and crowd classification. In
[15], Sethi and Chowdhury propose a phase space algorithm to identify pairwise correlation between the
motion patterns. Ge et al. find groups by hierarchical
clustering based on pairwise velocities and distance
[18], [7]. Zhou et al. find groups by using coherent filtering [16]. They propose a coherent neighbor invariance property which characterizes coherently moving
individuals. Sochman et al. [19] infer groups based
on social force model [14]. They define a pairwise
group activity confidence to identify groups. Srikrishnan and Chaudhuri in [20] define a linear cyclic
pursuit based framework for collective motion modelling with the goal of short-term prediction. But they
do not explore group detection and there is no analysis of crowd behavior. In the interesting work of [17],
they consider group detection as a clustering problem
and learn a socially meaningful pairwise affinity under Structural SVM framework.
x ( k + 1) = [ A | a ]
x(k)
= A0 x0 (k )
1
(1)
where N is the total number of agents, A ∈ R N × N ,
A0 ∈ R N ×( N +1) , a ∈ R N ×1 is the bias, x0 (k) ∈
R( N +1)×1 and xi (k) ∈ R is the location of the ith agent
at time instant k along the x-axis. We call A as the
interaction matrix which captures the evolution of an
agent as a function of all agents present in the scene.
Note that A has no assumption on its form and entries. It need not be symmetric i.e. agent i may not
depend on agent j in the same way as agent j depends
on agent. For example, consider a case where agent
i is stationary and agent j approaches him/her. Since
their behaviors are not symmetric with respect to each
other, we assume that it implies aij 6= a ji .
In this paper, it is assumed that the motions along
x and y directions are independent and hence can be
analyzed independently. The corresponding model
along y direction is y(k + 1) = By(k) + b. In the rest of
the paper, we discuss the solution for matrix A noting
this fact that the same process is also carried out for B.
In the end, the outputs from both the models are combined appropriately to get the final output. We expect
matrices A and B to be dependent on crowd motion.
Since crowd behavior might change with time, the interaction matrix is time varying in nature, which we
represent as Ak where k is a time instant. Assuming A
has N independent eigenvectors, the general solution
Most of the particle based algorithms compute pairwise velocity and spatial cues to find the groups
hierarchically. They do not model spatio-temporal
patterns of the agents collectively which might capture more complex interactions. Additionally, most
of the methods assume a constant velocity motion
model which is not valid for many scenarios. To address these limitations in the paper, we propose to
model motion trajectories collectively instead of individually or pairwise. Also instead of relying on
spatio-temporal information directly (which is prone
to noise) for group detection, we use spectral clustering to identify groups.
3
to Eq.(1) is given as
N
x(k) =
∑
{ci λik ei + di
i =1
λ i 6 =1
(λik − 1)
e }+
λi − 1 i
A and a with each incoming frame as interaction patterns may change over the time. In addition, sudden
changes in these interactions are unlikely. Therefore
it is desired that the entries of A and a do not change
drastically in consecutive time instants − we assume
them to be varying smoothly over time. We incorporate this constraint by minimizing l2 norm of the
difference between the current matrix A0k and the previous estimate at (k − 1)th instant. Furthermore for
crowded scenes, it is unlikely that an agent’s motion
depends on all the agents present in the neighborhood. We capture this sparse relationship in A0k by
minimizing l1 norm of A0k .
Adding these constraints to the cost function, the
final formulation at kth time instant becomes:
N
∑ (ci + kdi )ei ,
i =1
λ i =1
(2)
where λi is the ith eigenvalue, ei is the corresponding normalized eigenvector, ci and di are the corresponding constant coefficients that depend on the initial condition and a respectively. Different values of
λi and ei generate various motion patterns for an
agent. These patterns can be associated to different
motion tracks generated by an agent while walking,
approaching, splitting or being stationary. For example, an agent is stationary if λ1 = 1 and d1 = 0 at
location c1 e1 or an agent is moving with a constant
speed if λ1 = 1 and d1 6= 0. Hence, this more generalized model is appropriate for modeling temporally
localized complex motions.
Â0k
j
k
N
(n + i ) − x j
∑ ∑ |x actual
j
pred
A0k ∈R N ×( N +1)
n
1
k
2
||A0k Xkk−
− L − Xk− L+1 ||2
(4)
where Xi ∈ R N +1× L contains the positions of all N
agents from ith to jth frames concatenated together
with an appended row of ones to account for the bias,
A0k−1 is the estimate at the previous frame and r1 and
r2 are appropriate regularization parameters. Note
that we will use A0 instead of A0k for notational convenience.
One requires at least L ≥ ( N + 1) past positions
to solve the Eq. 4. Therefore the interaction pattern
is assumed to remain constant over L frames. Hence
we want L to be small enough to capture the shortterm linear relationship among the agents. A large N
(in crowded scenes) leads to two major problems: (i)
longer trajectories (i.e. higher L) are required to learn
the interaction matrix A0 as L ≥ N + 1 which may not
be available and (ii) the interaction may not remain
constant over past L positions for high values of L as
discussed before and we would like to keep L ≤ 30
as discussed in the previous section. To address these
problems, we identify spatial neighbors of each agent
separately and learn only the corresponding entries in
the matrix (one row at a time). The neighborhood is
defined as follows − the agent p is a neighbor to the
agent q if dist(p, q) < Rp . The value of Rp is decided
so as to satisfy the constraint L ≤ 30. The intuition
for enforcing the neighborhood criteria is that it is unlikely that far away agents influence the motion of an
agent. The advantage is that the shorter trajectories
are now sufficient as the number of entries of A0 to
be learned are lesser. Note that we estimate matrix A0
in a row-wise manner where the ith row has number
of entries to be estimated as equal to one more than
We use an average k-step prediction error as a measure to test the validity of the proposed model on
real videos. Fig. 2a shows average errors for different step size prediction on videos from BEHAVE and
CUHK datasets, each curve corresponding to a different video. The k-step prediction error at any time instant n is calculated as follows:
1
kN
min
o
+ r1 ||A0k − A0k−1 ||22 + r2 ||A0k ||1 ,
2.2. Validation of the Model
En (k ) =
= arg
(n + i )|, (3)
i =1 j =1
It may be noted that matrix A is estimated from the
latest video frames up to n and then Eq. 1 is used to
pred
obtain x j . The k-step prediction error for the video
is obtained by averaging En (k ) over all the frames of
the video. As expected, error increases with k but with
a marginal increment. We observe that, for both the
databases, prediction is quite valid up to 1-1.5 seconds
(about 30 frames). Since the model assumes that the
interaction remains same over L frames, Fig 2a suggests that one can select L upto 30 frames without
introducing much error. These error plots show that
the proposed model is suitable for short-term analysis, which is the underlying theme of the proposed algorithm.
2.3. Estimation of Interaction Model Parameters
The matrix A and vector a at any time instant are
learned from the immediate past trajectory data of all
the agents in a least squares framework. We update
4
(a) On videos from BEHAVE dataset
Error (in pixels)
30
20
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
45
50
(b) On videos from CUHK dataset
Error (in pixels)
30
20
10
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Number of frames predicted (k)
(a)
(b)
Figure 2: (a) Illustration of suitability of the proposed model: Average k-step prediction error for sample videos from BEHAVE and CUHK datasets, each curve corresponds to a different video. (b) Neighborhood criteria: Spatial neighborhoods
around agents p and r are represented as circles around them. There are a total of 20 agents in the scene out of which only 8
are neighbors of p. Estimation of elements of a row of A corresponding to agent p, considering all agents present in the scene
requires 2.5 × 20 = 50 previous video frames (assuming L = 2.5N). While the use of neighborhood constraint reduces this to
2.5 ∗ 9 ≈ 23 frames.
the number of the neighbors of agent i. Further, there
could be an agent within the spatial proximity of another agent but there may not be any interaction between them. Hence it is required that the corresponding entry in the matrix A0 should be zero. This is
enforced by adding sparsity constraint in Eq. 4. We
use L1General package developed by Schmidt [21] for
solving L1-regularization problems.
For an illustration, see Fig.2b. There are a total of
N = 20 agents present in the scene. Estimation of
the row of matrix A corresponding to agent p requires
50 previous frames (assuming L = 2.5N) whereas
the neighborhood based estimation reduces this to 23.
Also consider a case where agents p and r interact
with each other but are not within the spatial proximity owing to neighborhood constraint. The interaction
is captured when intersection of neighborhoods of p
and r has at least one interacting agent, in this case its
q who is in the spatial proximity of both.
Let the eigenvector matrix contain all the eigenvectors column-wise. We define a mapping for ith agent
as f ( xi ) : xi ∈ R → zi = (ei1 , ei2 , . . . , eir ) T ∈ Rr×1
where e ji is the ith entry of jth eigenvector of interaction matrix A and r is the number of significant eigenvalues. A clustering algorithm is applied on the points
{zi }, ∀i = 1, 2, . . . , N to identify the groups. The clustering algorithm runs on the components of eigenvectors, therefore this algorithm falls in the category of
spectral clustering [8]. Since the number of groups
is unknown, we apply a threshold based clustering.
The adaptive threshold used for the ith point is c|zi |,
where |zi | is its magnitude and c is found empirically.
For example, all the agents within the distance of c|z1 |
from z1 will form a group with agent 1. In this way,
all the groups are obtained. We consider only significant eigenvectors (with |λ| ≥ 0.90) of A for group detection since the response from the eigenvectors with
|λ| < 0.9 dies down to an insignificant level within
the period of L frames.
It may be noted that this group detection algorithm
remains the same in the case where A does not have
N independent eigenvectors. In such a case, the clustering algorithm runs on generalized eigenvectors.
3. Group Detection
In this section, we discuss an algorithm for identifying the groups present in the scene. As seen from
Eq. 2, the general solution is a linear combination of
eigenvectors at any time instant k. Notice that if the
corresponding entries of any two rows of the eigenvector matrix are similar, the corresponding agents
form a group. This group information is not available
from the position vector alone at a particular time instant x(k) because temporal evolution is also an important factor in deciding the groups. Since the eigenvectors are learned from the trajectories collectively, it
encapsulates spatio-temporal evolution of the agents
and hence can be exploited for group detection.
4. Group Activity Identification
While the eigenvectors identify the groups, the
eigenvalues can be used to determine the activity of
a group. We employ the same model mentioned in
Eq. 1 for the group g to estimate its interaction matrix Ag and ag . We do not use the submatrix formed
by the agents of the group g in the previously learned
0
matrix A0 = [A|a] to get Ag = [Ag |ag ]. This is to get
a refined matrix for the group and avoid any possi5
this corresponds to j = 1. Initially the two agents
were standing together and then the second agent
starts moving away from the first one leading to
split of the group.
ble interference from the outside agents in the estimag
g
g
tion. Let xg (k) = [ x1 (k), x2 (k ), . . . , x M (k)] T , where M
g
is the cardinality of the group g and xi (k) is the position of the ith agent of the group at time instant k. To
learn matrix Ag’ at kth time instant, we define a similar
optimization framework as follows, where the second
term enforces temporal continuity in the activity but
unlike Eq. 4, there is no need for sparsity constraint
as, by definition, all agents in a group interact. Therefore,
g’
Âk
= arg
g’
min
n
Ak ∈R M×( M+1)
g’
g’
+ λ||Ak − Ak−1 ||22
This group activity detection method is dependent
on eigenvalues and hence sensitive to perturbations in
the measurements. To address this, we define threshold bands for crucial values of eigenvalues. For example, if 0.995 < µ < 1.005, we consider µ to be 1 and if
µ < 0.5 then it is considered as 0.
4.1. Atomic Activity Detection
g’
1
k
2
||Ak Xkk−
− L − Xk− L+1 ||2
o
This algorithm is now extended to identification of
individual’s activity as follows. Let x (k ) denotes position of an agent at time k, then
(5)
x (k + 1) = µx (k) + b
Assuming Ag to be again diagonalizable, the general solution is similar as given in Eq. 2. The velocity
vector v(k) for the group g can be written as
M
v(k) =
∑
i =1
{ci (µi − 1)µik−1
+ di µik−1 }ui ,
(7)
The velocity v(k) is as follows:
v ( k ) = (1 − µ ) µ k −1 x (0 ) + µ k −1 b
(6)
(8)
Note that there is no longer a activity called splitting as one needs at least two agents to define it. We
identify following activities based on the value of µ:
where |µ1 | ≥ |µ2 | . . . ≥ |µ M | are the eigenvalues of
Ag . Since some of the coefficients ci and di could be
zero, let µ j be the largest eigenvalue for which at least
one of the coefficients ci or di is non-zero. Now we
state how different values of µ j characterize various
activities:
1. Stationary: An agent is stationary if |µ| = 0 at
the location given by b. It is also stationary when
|µ| = 1 and b = 0.
2. Stopping: 0 < |µ| < 1 indicates that the agent is
stopping soon.
1. Stationary: A group is stationary if |µ j | = 0 indicating all the eigenvalues (with at least one nonzero coefficient) to be zero. That corresponds to
zero velocity vector and hence the agents are stationary. In the illustration shown in Fig. 3(a), the
deciding eigenvalue is µ2 which is 0. The two
agents are stationary at locations 140 and 120 respectively.
3. Walking: An agent is walking if |µ| > 1. Further, an agent is walking with a constant velocity
if |µ| = 1 and b 6= 0.
Note that the group detection and activity recognition algorithms run in x and y directions independently and results need to be combined together. For
group detection, a group is formed only if it is formed
in both the directions. For example, let Zx = [1, 1, 2, 1]
and Zy = [2, 1, 2, 2] be the label vectors (indicating
assigned group number for all the four agents) obtained along x and y directions respectively. It says
that agents {1,2,4} form a group along x direction
while {1,3,4} form a group along y axis. Combining both the labels will result in the final label vector as Z = [1, 2, 3, 1] i.e. out of 4 agents, 1 and 4
are grouped together while agents 2 and 3 are singleton groups. To identify the final group activity
from the two separate group activity estimates along
x and y directions, we merge the two decisions according to the following priority sequence − Splitting>Walking>Approaching>Stationary. For example,
2. Approaching: A group has an approaching members if |µ j | < 1 as limk→∞ v(k ) → 0. In the example shown in Fig. 3(b), j = 2. One agent is stationary at 120 while the other agent starts from the
location 100 and approaches to the first one.
3. Walking: If |µ j | = 1 then the group is walking
with a constant velocity of d j u j . In Fig. 3(c), both
the agents walk together and deciding eigenvalue
corresponds to j = 2. Note that we do not discriminate between walking and running in this
work.
4. Splitting: A group has a tendency for divergence
if |µ j | > 1 as limk→∞ v(k) → ∞. In Fig. 3(d),
6
150
145
125
µ1 = 1, d1 = 0
µ2* = 0
120
125
µ1 = 1, d1 = 0
µ2* = 0.9, d2 ≠ 0
x(k)
100
115
140
110
115
135
130
50
105
100
110
0
95
125
90
105
120
115
0
150
120
85
5
10
100
0
k
5
10
k
80
0
µ1 = 1, d1 = 0
µ2* = 1, d2 ≠ 0
5
10
k
−50
15
−100
0
µ1* >1, c1 ≠ 0
5
10
k
Figure 3: Illustration of group activity - Stationary, Approaching, Walking and Splitting respectively from the estimated model
parameters for a group consisting of two members. Eigenvalue with ∗ is the activity deciding eigenvalue. See the text for
details.
if a group has splitting and approaching activities in x
and y directions respectively, the final group activity
is splitting.
We employ group level features that cover lowlevel details such as motion information to high-level
information such as group activities. The features are
described as follows:
5. Crowd Video Classification
1. Group density (GD): It is the ratio of number of
groups by the total number of agents in the scene.
A low value of GD indicates highly structured
crowd. For example, GD for a group of marching soldiers is small whereas a mixed crowd has
a higher group density.
Having group level information in hand, we can
use them in identifying the overall crowd behavior. Ability to identify crowd behavior enables crowd
management systems to design and manage public
places effectively to ensure safety and smooth operation. The overall crowd behavior is determined by
how each group behaves. Depending on the synchronization among the groups, the behavior of crowd
varies from being structured to unstructured. In this
section, we define group level features that are useful for crowd video classification. We classify crowd
videos into 8 classes as defined by [6]. The dataset
containing 474 video clips covers a variety of videos.
The eight classes are as follows:
2. Histogram of λmax : The histogram has three bins
which are λmax ≥ 1, λmax < 1 and λmax = 0,
where λmax is the largest eigenvalue of the interaction matrix for a group (µ j from the last section). The value at a particular bin is the number of groups in a scene having λmax as defined
by that bin. Left skewed histogram i.e. towards
λmax ≥ 1 indicates moving crowd whereas right
skewed histogram suggests more or less stationary crowd.
C1 : Mixed crowd
C2 : Well organized crowd following mainstream:
3. Histogram of motion direction: The motion direction of each member of a group is calculated
from its trajectory data and the mean direction is
assigned to the group. This histogram has eight
bins covering 0◦ to 360◦ with a bin size of 45◦ .
The bin value is the number of groups falling in
that particular bin. The uniform histogram indicates a mixed crowd whereas a skewed histogram
indicates directionality in the crowd movement.
C3 : Not well organized crowd following any mainstream
C4 : Crowd merge
C5 : Crowd split
C6 : Crowd crossing in opposite directions
Since the analysis is conducted independently in x
and y directions; we get two histograms for λmax , leading to final feature vector of length 1 + 2 × 3 + 8 = 15.
C7 : Intervened escalator traffic
C8 : Smooth escalator traffic
7
Table 1: Performance comparison of different group detection algorithms on CUHK dataset.
We use random forest (RF) as a classifier [22]. It consists of a multitude of decision trees that are trained
from randomly sampled subsets of training dataset
(bootstrap aggregating). This bootstrapping increases
the performance by reducing the variance of the classifier. Also the split at each node of a tree is decided by
m features selected randomly out of n features where
m << n. We use RF to classify a crowd video by training it with the above mentioned features. The classification results are discussed in next section.
NMI
Purity
RI
CF [16]
0.66
0.71
0.67
CT [6]
0.69
0.72
0.69
Proposed
0.86
0.90
0.85
for each video where we compare the proposed algorithm with other methods and the ground truth instead of manually deciding on the instants when the
performance has to be evaluated. We use Normalized
Mutual Information (NMI) [26], Purity [27] and Rand
Index (RI) [28] which are widely used for evaluation
of clustering algorithms. Table 1 shows the comparison on these measures. It is quite evident from the
table that the performance of the proposed algorithm
far surpasses those of [6] and [16].
Fig. 4 demonstrates a visual comparison for different scenarios. Since Zhou et al. in [16] find coherent
motion patterns at one time and then update them
over time, it is sensitive to tracking errors and has the
possibility of accumulation of errors if any frame has
tracking error. Shao et al. [6] assign every agent to
a collective transition prior. They have spatial proximity constraint only at the initial time instant which
might not be effective as time progresses. Their algorithm groups all the agents moving in the same direction giving less importance to their spatial relationships. This can be observed from the output figures
in column (b) of Fig. 4. Further in 4th row, a person
with red hat is moving faster than the group behind
him but CT and CF fail to capture this difference in
velocity while the proposed algorithm could capture
it. The groups in last row have small changes in their
directions of movement which is again not captured
by these two methods while the proposed method detects such small changes.
We also compare the proposed group detection algorithm with the method of [17] on the videos VEIIG,
student003 and eth. To compare with [17], we also
use G-MITRE precision P and recall R as proposed
by them. Table 2 shows the quantitative results that
indicate an improved performance by the proposed
method.
The proposed algorithm outperforms these stateof-the-art methods because it is more robust to tracking errors since we extract groups from the eigenvectors rather than directly using the tracklets. It is quite
evident from Fig. 4 where the tracklets for various
agents are marked with different colors to indicate the
group they belong to, that the proposed algorithm is
able to detect agents in a group much better than the
6. Experiments and Results
In this section, we discuss the performance of the
proposed algorithms for group detection, group activity recognition and crowd video classification. We
have tested our algorithms on various publicly available datasets containing real videos. We first discuss
these datasets followed by performance evaluation of
the proposed algorithms.
6.1. Datasets
We tested our algorithms on different videos from
various datasets contributed by several researchers
namely CUHK [6], BEHAVE [5], BIWI Walking Pedestrians [23], Crowds-By-Example (CBE) [24] and Vittorio
Emanuele II Gallery (VEIIG) [25]. CUHK dataset is a
comprehensive crowd video dataset containing 474
video clips covering various crowd behaviors with
varying crowd density. BEHAVE dataset has video
clips with low crowd density and covering various
group activities. BIWI dataset contains two low density crowd videos (namely eth and hotel). CBE has
a medium density crowd video (student003) recorded
outside a university. These datasets collectively cover
a large variety of crowd videos.
6.2. Group Detection
We tested group detection algorithm on all the 474
videos from CUHK dataset and 3 video clips (having
duration of more than 10 minutes in total) from BEHAVE dataset. In case of videos from CUHK dataset,
we restricted our algorithm to run only on those data
that have sufficiently long tracks, since some of the
clips are too short to accommodate for an analysis
of a large number of agents. We compared the proposed algorithm with other methods on these selected
agents. The ground truth for CUHK dataset was obtained manually.
We compare the proposed algorithm for group detection with state-of-the-art methods by Shao et al.
[6] and Zhou et al. [16]. For quantitative analysis on
CUHK videos, we randomly select two time instants
8
Table 2: Performance comparison of the proposed group detection with [17]
. BIWI eth
CBE student003
VEIIG
Baseline [17]
P
R
72.4 ± 4.4 65.2 ± 3.4
59.9 ± 2.9 53.5 ± 6.8
49.2 ± 9.9 34.4 ± 6.7
[17]
P
R
91.8 ± 1.2
94.2 ± 0.9
81.7 ± 0.2
82.5 ± 0.2
84.12 ± 0.6 84.11 ± 0.5
other existing methods. Also the proposed algorithm
yields NMI = 0.92, Purity = 0.94 and RI = 0.93 on
video clips from BEHAVE dataset whereas the corresponding measures for [6] and [16] have very low values (e.g. Purity for CF is only 0.35). It shows that these
methods do not perform well in videos of a sparse
crowd whereas the proposed method can also handle
a sparse crowd effectively.
Proposed
P
R
95.78 96.15
77.58 85.90
82.97 84.70
for Class 4 (Class Merge) is difficult, while the rest of
the classes could be categorized quite easily using the
proposed method. The OOB error, which indicates the
generalized error, converges to a value 30% as shown
in Fig. 7b. The importance plots, which show the significance of each group level feature in the classification are shown in Fig. 7c. It shows that the group density and histogram of eigenvalues are important for
classification.
6.3. Group Activity Recognition
We use BEHAVE and CUHK datasets for testing
the algorithm for group activity identification. Here,
we have excluded the clips containing other activities
such as fight. We compared the activity results with
the ground truth at regular intervals. Table 8 shows
the confusion matrix for the proposed algorithm on
BEHAVE dataset. The algorithm gives an accuracy of
70% for Walking and Stationary activities whereas it is
less for the other two activities. We observed that the
algorithm gets confused between these two activities.
We suspect that the confusion is due to the fact that
Splitting and Approaching are more abrupt in the motion dynamics than Walking and Stationary, which results in a poorer estimate of eigenvalues over the window of L frames. In CUHK dataset, since groups in
most of the videos are walking, we obtain an accuracy
of 85%. Some of the qualitative results on the videos
from BEHAVE and CUHK dataset are given in Fig. 5
and Fig. 6, respectively.
7. Conclusions
In this work, we presented a framework for analysis of medium dense crowd videos at various levels. We proposed a first order dynamical system
to model agent trajectories collectively and subsequently demonstrated the effectiveness of this interaction model for group detection. We also show how
eigenvalues of the model characterize group activities.
We then showed the effectiveness of group level features in crowd video classification.
Our algorithm assumes the availability of tracks
which itself is a challenge in many crowded videos
due to occlusion and other tracking problems. As
a next goal, we aspire to define a unified framework where the proposed model and a tracker work
together to improve each other’s performance in
crowded videos by incorporating group interaction
cues.
6.4. Crowd Video Classification
References
Since we update the interaction model with each
incoming frame as explained in Section 6, we collect
group level features at regular intervals. From each
class, we randomly pick 70% feature vectors to train
the classifier and the remaining for testing. As discussed before, we use random forest as a classifier
with n = 17 and m = 4. We run the classifier 100
times with random splits of dataset for training and
testing. To avoid over-fitting, the training data and
testing data do not contain features from the same
video. The average accuracy obtained is around 74%,
an improvement over [6] where the reported accuracy
is 70%. The confusion matrix is shown in Fig. 7a. From
this figure, it is seen that classification of the crowd
[1] T. Li, H. Chang, M. Wang, B. Ni, R. Hong, S. Yan,
Crowded scene analysis: A survey, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 25 (3) (2015) 367–386.
[2] M. Thida, Y. L. Yong, P. Climent-Pérez, H.-l. Eng,
P. Remagnino, A literature review on video analytics of crowded scenes, in: Intelligent Multimedia Surveillance, Springer, 2013, pp. 17–36.
[3] J. S. J. Junior, S. Musse, C. Jung, Crowd analysis using computer vision techniques, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 5 (27) (2010) 66–77.
9
(a) CF
(b) CT
(c) P
(d) GT
Figure 4: Comparison of group detection results from Coherent Filtering [16] in column (a), Collective Transition [6] in column
(b), our proposed method in column (c) with the ground truth in column (d) for different types of scenes. Each group is
represented by a different color. Best viewed in color and when zoomed.
[4] B. Zhan, D. N. Monekosso, P. Remagnino, S. A.
Velastin, L.-Q. Xu, Crowd analysis: a survey, Ma-
chine Vision and Applications 19 (5-6) (2008) 345–
357.
10
(a) stationary
(b) approaching
(c) walking, stationary
(d) splitting
Figure 5: Group activity results on BEHAVE dataset. Notation - St: Stationary, A: Approaching, W: Walking and Sp: Splitting.
Best viewed in color and when zoomed.
Figure 6: Group activity results on CUHK dataset. Same notation as in Fig. 5. Best viewed in color and when zoomed.
[5] S. Blunsden, R. Fisher, The behave video dataset:
ground truthed video for multi-person behavior
classification, Annals of the BMVA 4 (1-12) (2010)
4.
[8] A. Y. Ng, M. I. Jordan, Y. Weiss, et al., On spectral
clustering: Analysis and an algorithm, Advances
in neural information processing systems 2 (2002)
849–856.
[6] J. Shao, C. C. Loy, X. Wang, Scene-independent
group profiling in crowd, in: CVPR, 2014, IEEE,
2014, pp. 2227–2234.
[9] R. Mehran, B. E. Moore, M. Shah, A streakline
representation of flow in crowded scenes, in:
Computer Vision–ECCV 2010, Springer, 2010, pp.
439–452.
[7] W. Ge, R. T. Collins, R. B. Ruback, Vision-based
analysis of small groups in pedestrian crowds,
IEEE Trans. PAMI 34 (5) (2012) 1003–1016.
[10] B. Solmaz, B. E. Moore, M. Shah, Identifying behaviors in crowd scenes using stability analysis
for dynamical systems, IEEE Transactions on Pat11
C6 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.14 0.00
C7 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.07
C8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.91
C1
C2
C3
C4
C5
C6
C7
C8
magnitude
0.1
0.05
0.45
0
1
2
3
4
40
0.35
0.3
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15
feature
Mean decrease in Gini index
0.4
magnitude
C4 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
C5 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Mean decrease in Accuracy
0.15
0.5
OOB error rate
C3 0.00 0.10 0.80 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00
OOB error rate
0.55
C1 0.64 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00
C2 0.00 0.88 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
30
20
10
0
0.25
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
iteration (# trees)
(a)
(b)
3000
3500
4000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15
feature
(c)
Figure 7: (a) Confusion matrix with categories represented as C1 to C8 (true classes along the column and predicted classes
along the row), (b) Out of bag (OOB) error, (c) Importance plot for the features
object behaviour in phase space, in: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2011, IEEE, 2011, pp.
1502–1509.
[16] B. Zhou, X. Tang, X. Wang, Coherent filtering: detecting coherent motions from crowd clutters, in:
Computer Vision–ECCV 2012, Springer, 2012, pp.
857–871.
[17] F. Solera, S. Calderara, R. Cucchiara, Socially constrained structural learning for groups detection
in crowd, IEEE transactions on pattern analysis
and machine intelligence 38 (5) (2016) 995–1008.
Figure 8: Confusion matrix for group activity on BEHAVE
dataset. The true classes are along the column and the predicted classes are along the row.
[18] W. Ge, R. T. Collins, B. Ruback, Automatically detecting the small group structure of a crowd, in:
Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision
(WACV), 2009, IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–8.
tern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34 (10)
(2012) 2064–2070.
[11] Y. Benabbas, N. Ihaddadene, C. Djeraba, Motion
pattern extraction and event detection for automatic visual surveillance, Journal on Image and
Video Processing 2011 (2011) 7.
[19] J. Šochman, D. C. Hogg, Who knows whoinverting the social force model for finding
groups, in: IEEE International Conference on
Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops),
2011, IEEE, 2011, pp. 830–837.
[12] W. Lin, Y. Mi, W. Wang, J. Wu, J. Wang, T. Mei, A
diffusion and clustering-based approach for finding coherent motions and understanding crowd
scenes, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
25 (4) (2016) 1674–1687.
[20] V. Srikrishnan, S. Chaudhuri, Crowd motion
analysis using linear cyclic pursuit, in: International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR),
2010, IEEE, 2010, pp. 3340–3343.
[13] A. Pennisi, D. D. Bloisi, L. Iocchi, Online realtime crowd behavior detection in video sequences, Computer Vision and Image Understanding 144 (2016) 166–176.
[21] M. Schmidt, G. Fung, R. Rosales, Optimization methods for l1-regularization, University of
British Columbia, Technical Report TR-2009 19.
[22] L. Breiman, Random forests, Machine learning
45 (1) (2001) 5–32.
[14] D. Helbing, P. Molnar, Social force model for
pedestrian dynamics, Physical review E 51 (5)
(1995) 4282.
[23] S. Pellegrini, A. Ess, K. Schindler, L. Van Gool,
You’ll never walk alone: Modeling social behavior for multi-target tracking, in: 2009 IEEE 12th
[15] R. J. Sethi, A. K. Roy-Chowdhury, Individuals,
groups, and crowds: Modelling complex, multi12
International Conference on Computer Vision,
IEEE, 2009, pp. 261–268.
[24] A. Lerner, Y. Chrysanthou, D. Lischinski, Crowds
by example, in: Computer Graphics Forum,
Vol. 26, Wiley Online Library, 2007, pp. 655–664.
[25] S. Bandini, A. Gorrini, G. Vizzari, Towards an integrated approach to crowd analysis and crowd
synthesis: A case study and first results, Pattern
Recognition Letters 44 (2014) 16–29.
[26] M. Wu, B. Schölkopf, A local learning approach
for clustering, in: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2006, pp. 1529–1536.
[27] C. C. Aggarwal, A human-computer interactive
method for projected clustering, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16 (4)
(2004) 448–460.
[28] W. M. Rand, Objective criteria for the evaluation
of clustering methods, Journal of the American
Statistical association 66 (336) (1971) 846–850.
13
| 1cs.CV
|
Approximation Algorithms for Clustering Problems with Lower
Bounds and Outliers∗
arXiv:1608.01700v3 [cs.DS] 3 Nov 2016
Sara Ahmadian†
Chaitanya Swamy†
Abstract
We consider clustering problems with non-uniform lower bounds and outliers, and obtain the first approximation guarantees for these problems. We have a set F of facilities with lower bounds {Li }i∈F and
a set D of clients located in a common metric
space {c(i, j)}i,j∈F ∪D , and bounds k, m. A feasible solution is a pair S ⊆ F, σ : D 7→ S ∪ {out} , where σ specifies the client assignments, such that |S| ≤ k,
|σ −1 (i)| ≥ Li for all i ∈ S, and |σ −1 (out)| ≤ m.P
In the lower-bounded min-sum-of-radii with outliers
(LBkSRO) problem, the objective is to minimize i∈S maxj∈σ−1 (i) c(i, j), and in the lower-bounded
k-supplier with outliers (LBkSupO) problem, the objective is to minimize maxi∈S maxj∈σ−1 (i) c(i, j).
We obtain an approximation factor of 12.365 for LBkSRO, which improves to 3.83 for the nonoutlier version (i.e., m = 0). These also constitute the first approximation bounds for the min-sum-ofradii objective when we consider lower bounds and outliers separately. We apply the primal-dual method
to the relaxation where we Lagrangify the |S| ≤ k constraint. The chief technical contribution and
novelty of our algorithm is that, departing from the standard paradigm used for such constrained problems, we obtain an O(1)-approximation despite the fact that we do not obtain a Lagrangian-multiplierpreserving algorithm for the Lagrangian relaxation. We believe that our ideas have broader applicability
to other clustering problems with outliers as well.
We obtain approximation factors of 5 and 3 respectively for LBkSupO and its non-outlier version.
These are the first approximation results for k-supplier with non-uniform lower bounds.
1
Introduction
Clustering is an ubiquitous problem that arises in many applications in different fields such as data mining,
machine learning, image processing, and bioinformatics. Many of these problems involve finding a set S
of at most k “cluster centers”, and an assignment σ mapping an underlying set D of data points located
in some metric space {c(i, j)} to S, to minimize some objective
P function; examples include the k-center
(minimize maxj∈D P
c(σ(j), j)) [21, 22], k-median (minimize j∈D c(σ(j), j)) [10, 23, 26, 7], and min-sumof-radii (minimize i∈S maxj:σ(j)=i c(i, j)) [16, 12] problems. Viewed from this perspective, clustering
problems can often be viewed as facility-location problems, wherein an underlying set of clients that require
service need to be assigned to facilities that provide service in a cost-effective fashion. Both clustering and
facility-location problems have been extensively studied in the Computer Science and Operations Research
literature; see, e.g., [28, 30] in addition to the above references.
We consider clustering problems with (non-uniform) lower-bound requirements on the cluster sizes, and
where a bounded number of points may be designated as outliers and left unclustered. One motivation for
considering lower bounds comes from an anonymity consideration. In order to achieve data privacy, [29]
proposed an anonymization problem where we seek to perturb (in a specific way) some of (the attributes of)
∗
A preliminary version [3] appeared in the Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 2016.
†
{sahmadian,cswamy}@uwaterloo.ca. Dept. of Combinatorics and Optimization, Univ. Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L
3G1. Supported in part by NSERC grant 327620-09 and an NSERC Discovery Accelerator Supplement award.
1
the data points and then cluster them so that every cluster has at least L identical perturbed data points, thus
making it difficult to identify the original data from the clustering. As noted in [2, 1], this anonymization
problem can be abstracted as a lower-bounded clustering problem where the clustering objective captures
the cost of perturbing data. Another motivation comes from a facility-location perspective, where (as in the
case of lower-bounded facility location), the lower bounds model that it is infeasible or unprofitable to use
services unless they satisfy a certain minimum demand (see, e.g., [27]). Allowing outliers enables one to
handle a common woe in clustering problems, namely that data points that are quite dissimilar from any
other data point can often disproportionately (and undesirably) degrade the quality of any clustering of the
entire data set; instead, the outlier-version allows one to designate such data points as outliers and focus on
the data points of interest.
Formally, adopting the facility-location terminology, our setup is as follows. We have a set F of facilities
with lower bounds {Li }i∈F and a set D of clients located in a common metric space {c(i, j)}i,j∈F ∪D , and
bounds k, m. A feasible solution chooses a set S ⊆ F of at most k facilities, and assigns each client j to a
facility σ(j) ∈ S, or designates j as an outlier by setting σ(j) = out P
so that |σ −1 (i)| ≥ Li for all i ∈ S, and
−1
|σ (out)| ≤ m. We consider two clustering objectives: minimize i∈S maxj:σ(j)=i c(i, j), which yields
the lower-bounded min-sum-of-radii with outliers (LBkSRO) problem, and minimize maxi∈S maxj:σ(j)=i c(i, j),
which yields the lower-bounded k-supplier with outliers (LBkSupO) problem. (k-supplier denotes the
facility-location version of k-center; the latter typically has F = D.) We refer to the non-outlier versions of
the above problems (i.e., where m = 0) as LBkSR and LBkSup respectively.
Our contributions. We obtain the first results for clustering problems with non-uniform lower bounds
and outliers. We develop various techniques for tackling these problems using which we obtain constantfactor approximation guarantees for LBkSRO and LBkSupO. Note that we need to ensure that none of the
three types of hard constraints involved here—at most k clusters, non-uniform lower bounds, and at most m
outliers—are violated, which is somewhat challenging.
We obtain an approximation factor of 12.365 for LBkSRO (Theorem 2.8, Section 2.2), which improves
to 3.83 for the non-outlier version LBkSR (Theorem 2.7, Section 2.1). These also constitute the first approximation results for the min-sum-of-radii objective when we consider: (a) lower bounds (even uniform
bounds) but no outliers (LBkSR); and (b) outliers but no lower bounds. Previously, an O(1)-approximation
was known only in the setting where there are no lower bounds and no outliers (i.e., Li = 0 for all i,
m = 0) [12].
For the k-supplier objective (Section 3), we obtain an approximation factor of 5 for LBkSupO (Theorem 3.2), and 3 for LBkSup (Theorem 3.1). These are the first approximation results for the k-supplier problem with non-uniform lower bounds. Previously, [1] obtained approximation factors of 4 and 2 respectively
for LBkSupO and LBkSup for the special case of uniform lower bounds and when F = D. Complementing our approximation bounds, we prove a factor-3 hardness of approximation for LBkSup (Theorem 3.3),
which shows that our approximation factor of 3 is optimal for LBkSup. We also show (Appendix C) that
LBkSupO is equivalent to the k-center version of the problem (where F = D).
Our techniques. Our main technical contribution is an O(1)-approximation algorithm for LBkSRO (Section 2.2). Whereas for the non-outlier version LBkSR (Section 2.1), one can follow an approach similar to
that of Charikar and Panigrahi [12] for the min-sum-of-radii problem without lower bounds or outliers, the
presence of outliers creates substantial difficulties whose resolution requires various novel ingredients. As
in [12], we view LBkSRO as a k-ball-selection (k-BS) problem of picking k suitable balls (see Section 2)
and consider its LP-relaxation (P2 ). Let OPT denote its optimal value. Following the Jain-Vazirani (JV)
template for k-median [23], we move to the version where we may pick any number of balls but incur a
fixed cost of z for each ball we pick. The dual LP (D2 ) has αj dual variables for the clients, which “pay” for
(i, r) pairs (where (i, r) denotes the ball {j ∈ D : c(i, j) ≤ r}). For LBkSR (where m = 0), as observed
2
in [12], it is easy to adapt the JV primal-dual algorithm for facility location to handle this fixed-cost version
of k-BS: we raise the αj s of uncovered clients until all clients are covered by some fully-paid (i, r) pair (see
PDAlg). This yields a so-called Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving
(LMP) 3-approximation algorithm: if F
P
is the primal solution constructed, then 3 j αj can pay for cost(F ) + 3|F |z; hence, by varying z, one can
find two solutions F1 , F2 for nearby values of z, and combine them to extract a low-cost k-BS-solution.
The presence of outliers in LBkSRO significantly complicates things. The natural adaptation of the
primal-dual algorithm is to now stop when at least |D| − m clients are covered by fully-paid (i, r) pairs.
But now, the dual objective involves a −m · γ term, where γ = maxj αj , which potentially cancels the
dual contribution of (some) clients that pay for the last fully-paid (i, r) pair, say f . Consequently, we do
not obtain anPLMP-approximation: if F is the primal solution we construct, we can only say that (loosely
speaking) 3( j αj − m · γ) pays for cost(F \ f ) + 3|F \ f |z (see Theorem 2.9 (ii)). In particular, this
means that even if the primal-dual algorithm returns a solution with k pairs, its cost need not be bounded,
an artifact that never arises in LBkSR (or k-median). This in turn means that by combining the two solutions
F1 , F2 found for z1 , z2 ≈ z1 , we only obtain a solution of cost O(OPT + z1 ) (see Theorem 2.14).
Dealing with the case where z1 = Ω(OPT ) is technically the most involved portion of our algorithm
(Section 2.2.2). We argue that in this case the solutions F1 , F2 (may be assumed to) have a very specific
structure: |F1 | = k + 1, and every F2 -ball intersects at most one F1 -ball, and vice versa. We utilize this
structure to show that either we can find a good solution in a suitable neighborhood of F1 and F2 , or F2
itself must be a good solution.
We remark that the above difficulties (i.e., the inability to pay for the last “facility” and the ensuing
complications) also arise in the k-median problem with outliers. We believe that our ideas also have implications for this problem and should yield a much-improved approximation ratio for this problem. (The
current approximation ratio is a large (unspecified) constant [13].)
For the k-supplier problem, LBkSupO, we leverage the notion of skeletons and pre-skeletons defined
by [15] in the context of capacitated k-supplier with outliers, wherein facilities have capacities instead of
lower bounds limiting the number of clients that can be assigned to them. Roughly speaking, a skeleton
F ⊆ F ensures there is a low-cost solution (F, σ). A pre-skeleton satisfies some of the properties of a
skeleton. We show that if F is a pre-skeleton, then either F is a skeleton or F ∪ {i} is a pre-skeleton for
some facility i. This allows one to find a sequence of facility-sets such that at least one of them is a skeleton.
For a given set F , one can check if F admits a low-cost assignment σ, so this yields an O(1)-approximation
algorithm.
Related work. There is a wealth of literature on clustering and facility-location (FL) problems (see,
e.g., [28, 30]); we limit ourselves to the work that is relevant to LBkSRO and LBkSupO.
The only prior work on clustering problems to incorporate both lower bounds and outliers is by Aggarwal et al. [1]. They obtain approximation ratios of 4 and 2 respectively for LBkSupO and LBkSup with
uniform lower bounds and when F = D, which they consider as a means of achieving anonymity. They
also consider an alternate cellular clustering (CellC) objective and devise an O(1)-approximation algorithm
for lower-bounded CellC, again with uniform lower bounds, and mention that this can be extended to an
O(1)-approximation for lower-bounded CellC with outliers.
More work has been directed towards clustering problems that involve either outliers or lower bounds
(but not both), and here, clustering with outliers has received more attention than lower-bounded clustering
problems. Charikar et al. [11] consider (among other problems) the outlier-versions of the uncapacitated
FL, k-supplier and k-median problems. They devise constant-factor approximations for the first two problems, and a bicriteria approximation for the k-median problem with outliers. They also proved a factor-3
approximation hardness result for k-supplier with outliers. This nicely complements our factor-3 hardness
result for k-supplier with lower bounds but no outliers. Chen [13] obtained the first true approximation
for k-median with outliers via a sophisticated combination of the primal-dual algorithm for k-median and
3
local search that yields a large (unspecified) O(1)-approximation. As remarked earlier, the difficulties that
we overcome in designing our 12.365-approximation for LBkSRO are similar in spirit to the difficulties
that arise in k-median with outliers, and we believe that our techniques should also help and significantly
improve the approximation ratio for this problem. Cygan and Kociumaka [15] consider the capacitated ksupplier with outliers problem, and devise a 25-approximation algorithm. We leverage some of their ideas
in developing our algorithm for LBkSupO.
Lower-bounded clustering and FL problems remain largely unexplored and are not well understood.
Besides LBkSup (which has also been studied in Euclidean spaces [17]), another such FL problem that
has been studied is lower-bounded facility location (LBFL) [24, 20], wherein we seek to open (any number
of) facilities
(which have lower bounds) and assign each client j to an open facility σ(j) so as to miniP
mize j∈D c(σ(j), j). Svitkina [31] obtained the first true approximation for LBFL, achieving an O(1)approximation; the O(1)-factor was subsequently improved by [4]. Both results apply to LBFL with uniform lower bounds, and can be adapted to yield O(1)-approximations to the k-median variant (where we
may open at most k facilities).
We now discuss work related to our clustering objectives, albeit that does not consider lower bounds
or outliers. Doddi et al. [16] introduced the k-clustering min-sum-of-diameters (kSD) problem, which is
closely related to the k-clustering min-sum-of-radii (kSR) problem: the kSD-cost is at least the kSR-cost,
and at most twice the kSR-cost. The former problem is somewhat better understood than the latter one.
Whereas the kSD problem is APX-hard even for shortest-path metrics of unweighted graphs (it is NP-hard
to obtain a better than 2 approximation [16]), the kSR problem is only known to be NP-hard for general
metrics, and its complexity for shortest-path metrics of unweighted graphs is not yet settled with only a
quasipolytime (exact) algorithm known [18]. On the positive side, Charikar and Panigrahi [12] devised the
first (and current-best) O(1)-approximation algorithms for these problems, obtaining approximation ratios
of 3.504 and 7.008 for the kSR and kSD problems respectively, and Gibson et al. [18] obtain a quasi-PTAS
for the kSR problem when F = D. Various other results are known for specific metric spaces and when
F = D, such as Euclidean spaces [19, 8] and metrics with bounded aspect ratios [18, 6].
The k-supplier and k-center (i.e., k-supplier with F = D) objectives have a rich history of study.
Hochbaum and Shmoys [21, 22] obtained optimal approximation ratios of 3 and 2 for these problems
respectively. Capacitated versions of k-center and k-supplier have also been studied: [25] devised a 6approximation for uniform capacities, [14] obtained the first O(1)-approximation for non-uniform capacities, and this O(1)-factor was improved to 9 in [5].
Finally, our algorithm for LBkSRO leverages the template based on Lagrangian relaxation and the
primal-dual method to emerge from the work of [23, 9] for the k-median problem.
2
Minimizing sum of radii with lower bounds and outliers
Recall that in the lower-bounded min-sum-of-radii with outliers (LBkSRO) problem, we have a facility-set
F and client-set D located in a metric space {c(i, j)}i,j∈F ∪D, lower bounds {Li }i∈F , and bounds k and m.
A feasible solution is a pair S ⊆ F, σ : D 7→ S ∪ {out} , where σ(j) ∈ S indicates that j is assigned
−1
to facility σ(j), and σ(j) = out designates j as an outlier, such
P that |σ (i)| ≥ Li for all i ∈ S, and
−1
|σ (out)| ≤ m. The cost of such a solution is cost(S, σ) := i∈S ri , where ri := maxj∈σ−1 (i) c(i, j)
denotes the radius of facility i; the goal is to find a solution of minimum cost. We use LBkSR to denote the
non-outlier version where m = 0.
It will be convenient to consider a relaxation of LBkSRO that we call the k-ball-selection (k-BS) problem, which focuses on selecting at most k balls centered at facilities of minimum total radius. More precisely, let B(i, r) := {j ∈ D : c(i, j) ≤ r} denote the ball of clients centered
at i with radius r. Let
S
cmax = maxi∈F ,j∈D c(i, j). Let Li := {(i, r) : |B(i, r)| ≥ Li }, and L := i∈F Li . The goal in k-BS is to
4
P
S
find a set F ⊆ L with |F | ≤ k and D \ (i,r)∈F B(i, r) ≤ m so that cost(F ) := (i,r)∈F r is minimized.
(When formulating the LP-relaxation of the k-BS-problem, we equivalently view L as containing only pairs
of the form (i, c(i, j)) for some client j, which makes L finite.) It is easy to see that any LBkSRO-solution
yields a k-BS-solution of no greater cost. The key advantage of working with k-BS is that we do not explicitly consider the lower bounds (they are folded into the Li s) and we do not require the balls B(i, r)
for (i, r) ∈ F to be disjoint. While a k-BS-solution F need not directly translate to a feasible LBkSROsolution, one can show that it does yield a feasible LBkSRO-solution of cost at most 2 · cost(F ). We prove a
stronger version of this statement in Lemma 2.1. In the following two sections, we utilize this relaxation to
devise the first constant-factor approximation algorithms for for LBkSR and LBkSRO. To our knowledge,
our algorithm is also the first O(1)-approximation algorithm for the outlier version of the min-sum-of-radii
problem without lower bounds.
We consider an LP-relaxation for the k-BS-problem, and to round a fractional k-BS-solution to a good
integral solution, we need to preclude radii that are much larger than those used by an (integral) optimal solution. We therefore “guess” the t facilities in the optimal solution with the largest
radii, and Otheir
2t
radii, where t ≥ 1 is some constant. That is, we enumerate over all O (|F| + |D|) S choices F =
{(i1 , r1 ), . . . , (it , rt )} of t (i, r) pairs from L. For each such selection, we set D0 = D \ (i,r)∈F O B(i, r),
L0 = {(i, r) ∈ L : r ≤ min(i,r)∈F O r} and k 0 = k − |F O |, and run our k-BS-algorithm on the modified
k-BS-instance (F, D0 .L0 , c, k 0 , m) to obtain a k-BS-solution F . We translate F ∪ F O to an LBkSROsolution, and return the best of these solutions. The following lemma, and the procedure described therein,
is repeatedly used to bound the cost of translating F ∪ F O to a feasible LBkSRO-solution. We call pairs
(i, r), (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F × R≥0 non-intersecting, if c(i, i0 ) > r + r0 , and intersecting otherwise. Note that
B(i, r) ∩ B(i0 , r0 ) = ∅ if (i, r) and (i0 , r0 ) are non-intersecting. For a set P ⊆ F × R≥0 of pairs, define
µ(P ) := {i ∈ F : ∃r s.t. (i, r) ∈ P }.
Lemma 2.1. Let F O ⊆ L, and D0 , L0 , k 0 be as defined above. Let F ⊆ L be a k-BS-solution for the
k-BS-instance (F, D0 , L0 , c, kS0 , m). Suppose for each i ∈ µ(F ), we have a radius ri0 ≤ maxr:(i,r)∈F r
and U ⊆ L. Then there exists a feasible
such that the pairs in U := i∈µ(F ) (i, ri0 ) are non-intersecting
P
LBkSRO-solution (S, σ) with cost(S, σ) ≤ cost(F ) + (i,r)∈F O 2r.
Proof. Pick a maximal subset P ⊆ F O to add to U such that all pairs in U 0 = U ∪ P are non-intersecting.
For each (i, r) ∈ F O \ P , define κ(i, r) to be some intersecting pair (i0 , r0 ) ∈ U 0 . Define S = µ(U 0 ).
Assign each client j to σ(j) ∈ S as follows. If j ∈ B(i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ U 0 , set σ(j) = i. Note that
U 0 ⊆ L, so this satisfies the lower bounds for all i ∈ S. Otherwise, if j ∈ B(i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ F , set
σ(j) = i. Otherwise, if j ∈ B(i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ F O \ P and (i0 , r0 ) = κ(i, r), set σ(j) = i0 . Any
remaining unassigned client is not covered by the balls corresponding to pairs in F ∪ F O . There are at most
m such clients, and we set σ(j) = out for each such client j. Thus (S, σ) is a feasible LBkSRO-solution.
For any i ∈ S and j ∈ σ −1 (i) either j ∈ B(i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ F ∪ U 0 , or
j ∈ B(i0 , r0 ) where
P
κ(i0 , r0 ) = (i, r) ∈ U 0 , in which case c(i, j) ≤ r + 2r0 . So cost(S, σ) ≤ cost(F ) + (i,r)∈F O 2r.
2.1
Approximation algorithm for LBkSR
We now present our algorithm for the non-outlier version, LBkSR, which will introduce many of the ideas
underlying our algorithm for LBkSRO described in Section 2.2. Let O∗ denote the cost of an optimal
solution to the given LBkSR instance.
As discussed
above, for each selection of (i1 , r1 ), . . . , (it , rt ) of t pairs, we do the following. We set
S
D0 = D \ tp=1 B(ip , rp ), L0 = {(i, r) ∈ L : r ≤ R∗ := minp=1,...,t rp }, k 0 = k − t, and consider the
k-BS-problem of picking at most k 0 pairs from L0 whose corresponding balls cover D0 incurring minimum
cost (but our algorithm k-BSAlg will return pairs from L). We consider the following natural LP-relaxation
5
(P1 ) of this problem, and its dual (D1 ).
X
r · yi,r
min
(P1 )
max
X
yi,r ≥ 1
∀j ∈ D0
s.t.
(D1 )
X
αj − z ≤ r
∀(i, r) ∈ L0
(2)
j∈B(i,r)∩D0
(i,r)∈L0 :j∈B(i,r)
X
αj − k 0 · z
j∈D0
(i,r)∈L0
s.t.
X
yi,r ≤ k 0
α, z ≥ 0.
(1)
(i,r)∈L0
y ≥ 0.
If (P1 ) is infeasible then we discard this choice of t pairs and move on to the next selection. So we assume
(P1 ) is feasible in the remainder of this section. Let OPT denote the common optimal value of (P1 ) and (D1 ).
As in the JV-algorithm for k-median, we Lagrangify constraint (1) and consider the unconstrained problem
where we do not bound the number of pairs we may pick, but we incur a fixed cost z for each pair (i, r)
that we pick (in addition to r). It is easy to adapt the JV primal-dual algorithm for facility location [23] to
devise a simple Lagrangian-multiplier-preserving (LMP) 3-approximation algorithm for this problem (see
PDAlg and Theorem 2.3). We use this LMP algorithm within a binary-search procedure for z to obtain
two solutions F1 and F2 with |F1 | ≤ k < |F2 |, and show that these can be “combined” to extract a k-BSsolution F of cost at most 3.83 · OPT + O(R∗ ) (Lemma A.4). This combination step is more involved
than in k-median. The main idea here is to use the F2 solution as a guide to merge some F1 -pairs. We
cluster the F1 pairs around the F2 -pairs and setup a covering-knapsack problem whose solution determines
for each F2 -pair (i, r), whether to “merge” the F1 -pairs clustered around (i, r) or select all these F1 -pairs
(see step B2). Finally, we add back the pairs (i1 , r1 ), . . . (it , rt ) selected earlier and apply Lemma 2.1 to
obtain an LBkSR-solution. As required by Lemma 2.1, to aid in this translation, our k-BS-algorithm returns,
along with F , a suitable radius rad(i) for every facility i ∈ µ(F ). This yields a (3.83 + )-approximation
algorithm (Theorem 2.7).
While our approach is similar to the one in [12] for the min-sum-of-radii problem without lower bounds
(although our combination step is notably simpler), an important distinction that arises is the following. In
the absence of lower bounds, the ball-selection problem k-BS is equivalent to the min-sum-of-radii problem,
but (as noted earlier) this is no longer the case when we have lower bounds since in k-BS we do not insist
that the balls we pick be disjoint. Consequently, moving from overlapping balls in a k-BS-solution to an
LBkSR-solution incurs, in general, a factor-2 blowup in the cost (see Lemma 2.1). It is interesting that we
are able to avoid this blowup and obtain an approximation factor that is quite close to the approximation
factor (of 3.504) achieved in [12] for the min-sum-of-radii problem without lower bounds.
We now describe our algorithm in detail and proceed to analyze it. We describe a slightly simpler
(6.183 + )-approximation algorithm below (Theorem 2.2). We sketch the ideas behind the improved approximation ratio at the end of this section and defer the details to Appendix A.
Algorithm 1. Input: An LBkSR-instance I = F, D, {Li }, {c(i, j)}, k , parameter > 0.
Output: A feasible solution (S, σ).
A1. Let t = min k, 1 . For each set F O ⊆ L with |F O | = t, do the following.
S
A1.1. Set D0 = D \ (i,r)∈F O B(i, r), L0 = {(i, r) ∈ L : r ≤ R∗ = min(i,r)∈F O r}, and k 0 = k − t.
O
0
0
0 0
A1.2. If (P1 ) is infeasible, then reject
this guess and move to the next set F . If D 6= ∅, run k-BSAlg(D , L , k , )
to obtain F, {rad(i)}i∈F ; else set (F, rad) = (∅, ∅).
A1.3. Apply the procedure in Lemma 2.1 taking ri0 = rad(i) for all i ∈ µ(F ) to obtain (S, σ).
A2. Among all the solutions (S, σ) found in step A2, return the one with smallest cost.
6
Figure 1: An example of stars formed by F1 and F2 where F1 = {u1 , u2 , . . . , u11 } and F2 =
{v1 , v2 , . . . , v6 } depicted by squares and circles, respectively.
Algorithm k-BSAlg(D 0 , L0 , k0 , ). Output: F ⊆ L with |F | ≤ k 0 , a radius rad(i) for all i ∈ µ(F ).
B1. Binary search for z.
B1.1. Set z1 = 0 and z2 = 2k 0 cmax . For p = 1, 2, let(Fp , {radp (i)}, αp ) ← PDAlg(D0 , L0 , zp ), and let
kp = |Fp |. If k1 ≤ k 0 , stop and return F1 , {rad1 (i)} . We prove in Theorem 2.3 that k2 ≤ k 0 ; if k2 = k 0 ,
stop and return F2 , {rad2 (i)} .
z1 +z2
B1.2. Repeat the following until z2 − z1 ≤ δz = OPT
3n , where n = |F| + |D|. Set z =
2 . Let
0
0
0
(F, {rad(i)}, α) ← PDAlg(D , L , z). If |F | = k , stop and return F, {rad(i)} ; if |F | > k 0 , update
z1 ← z and (F1 , rad1 , α1 ) ← (F, rad, α), else update z2 ← z and (F2 , rad2 , α2 ) ← (F, rad, α).
B2. Combining F1 and F2 . Let π : F1 7→ F2 be any map such that (i0 , r0 ) and π(i0 , r0 ) intersect ∀(i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 .
(This exists since every j ∈ D0 is covered by B(i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ F2 .) Define star Si,r = π −1 (i, r) for all
(i, r) ∈ F2 (see Fig. 1). Solve the following covering-knapsack LP.
X
P
P
min
xi,r (2r + (i0 ,r0 )∈Si,r 2r0 ) + (1 − xi,r ) (i0 ,r0 )∈Si,r r0
(C-P)
(i,r)∈F2
s.t.
X
xi,r + |Si,r |(1 − xi,r ) ≤ k,
0 ≤ xi,r ≤ 1
∀(i, r) ∈ F2 .
(i,r)∈F2
Let x∗ be an extreme-point optimal solution to (C-P). The variable x(i,r) has the following interpretation. If
x∗i,r = 0, then we select all pairs in Si,r . Otherwise, if Si,r 6= ∅, we pick a pair in (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Si,r , and include
(i0 , 2r + r0 + max(i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r \{(i0 ,r0 )} 2r00 ) in our solution.
the radius of i0 to 2r + r0 +
S Notice that by expanding
00
00
00
max(i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r \{(i0 ,r0 )} 2r , we cover all the clients in (i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r B(i , r ). Let F 0 be the resulting set of
pairs.
B3. If cost(F2 ) ≤ cost(F ), return (F2 , rad2 ), else return F 0 , {rad1 (i)}i∈µ(F 0 ) .
Algorithm PDAlg(D 0 , L0 , z). Output: F ⊆ L, radius rad(i) for all i ∈ µ(F ), dual solution α.
P1. Dual-ascent phase. Start with αj = 0 for all j ∈ D0 , D0 as the set of active clients, and the set T of tight
pairs initialized to ∅. We repeat the following until all clients become inactive: we raise the αj s of all active
clients uniformly until constraint (2) becomes tight for some (i, r); we add (i, r) to T and mark all active clients
in B(i, r) as inactive.
P2. Pruning phase. Let TI be a maximal subset of non-intersecting pairs in T picked by a greedy algorithm that
scans pairs in T in non-increasing order of radius. Note that for each i ∈ µ(TI ), there is exactly one pair
(i, r) ∈ TI . We set rad(i) = r, and ri = max {c(i, j) : j ∈ B(i0 , r0 ), (i0 , r0 ) ∈ T, r0 ≤ r, (i0 , r0 ) intersects (i, r)
((i0 , r0 ) could be (i, r))}. Let F = {(i, ri )}i∈µ(TI ) . Return F , {rad(i)}i∈µ(TI ) , and α.
Analysis. We prove the following result.
Theorem 2.2. For any > 0, Algorithm 1 returns a feasible LBkSR-solution of cost at most 6.1821 +
O() O∗ in time nO(1/) .
We firstP
prove that PDAlg is an LMP 3-approximation algorithm, i.e., its output (F, α) satisfies cost(F )+
3|F |z ≤ 3 j∈D0 αj (Theorem 2.3). Utilizing this, we analyze k-BSAlg, in particular, the output of the
combination step B2, and argue that k-BSAlg returns a feasible solution of cost at most 6.183 + O() ·
OPT + O(R∗ ) (Theorem 2.5). For the right choice of F O , combining this with Lemma 2.1 yields Theorem 2.2.
7
Theorem 2.3. Suppose PDAlg(D0 , L0 , z) returns (F, {rad(i)}, α). Then
(i) the balls corresponding to F cover D0 ,
P
(ii) cost(F ) + 3|F |z ≤ 3 j∈D0 αj ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z),
(iii) (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 , is a set of non-intersecting pairs, and rad(i) ≤ ri ≤ 3R∗ ∀i ∈ µ(F ),
(iv) if |F | ≥ k 0 then cost(F ) ≤ 3 · OPT ; if |F | > k 0 , then z ≤ OPT . (Hence, k2 ≤ k 0 in step B1.1.)
Proof. We prove parts (i)—(iii) first. Note that (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) is TI (by definition). Consider a client
j ∈ D0 and let (i0 , r0 ) denote the pair in T that causes j to become inactive. Then there must be a pair
(i, r) ∈ TI that intersects (i0 , r0 ) such that r ≥ r0 (we could have (i, r) = (i0 , r0 )). Since by definition
ri ≥ c(i, j), j ∈ B(i, ri ). Also, c(i, i0 ) ≤ r + r0 . So if j is the client that determines ri , then ri = c(i, j) ≤
c(i0 , i) + c(i, j) ≤ 2r0 + r ≤ 3r ≤ 3R∗ .
All pairs in TI are tight and non-intersecting. So for every i ∈ µ(F ), there must be some j ∈
B(i, rad(i)) ∩ D0 with c(i, j) = rad(i), so rad(i) ≤ ri . Since |F | = |TI |,
X
X
X
X
(ri + 3z) ≤
3αj ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z).
cost(F ) + 3|F |z =
(3r + 3z) =
3αj ≤
(i,r)∈TI
(i,r)∈TI
(i,r)∈TI
j∈B(i,r)∩D0
j∈D0
The last inequality above follows since (α, z) is a feasible solution to (D1 ).
Rearranging the bound yields 3(|F |−k 0 )z ≤ 3·OPT −cost(F ), so when |F | ≥ k 0 , we have cost(F ) ≤
3 · OPT , and when |F | > k 0 , we have z ≤ OPT .
Recall that in step B1.1, k2 is the number of pairs returned by PDAlg for z = 2k 0 cmax . So the last
0
0
statement follows
Psince OPT ≤ k0 cmax , as all balls in L have radius at most cmax and any feasible solution
to (P1 ) satisfies (i,r)∈L0 yi,r ≤ k .
Let F, {rad(i)} = k-BSAlg(D0 , L0 , k 0 ). If k-BSAlg terminates in step B1, then cost(F ) ≤ 3 · OPT
due to part (ii) of Theorem 2.3, so assume otherwise. Let a, b ≥ 0 be such that ak1 + bk2 = k 0 , a + b = 1.
Let C1 = cost(F1 ) and C2 = cost(F2 ). Recall that (F1 , rad1 , α1 ) and (F2 , rad2 , α2 ) are the outputs of
PDAlg for z1 and z2 respectively.
Claim 2.4. We have aC1 + bC2 ≤ (3 + )OPT .
Proof. By part (ii) of Theorem 2.3, we have C1 +3k1 z1 ≤ 3(OPT +k 0 z1 ) and C2 +3k2 z2 ≤ 3(OPT +k 0 z2 ).
Combining these, we obtain
aC1 +bC2 ≤ 3OPT +3k 0 (az1 +bz2 )−3(ak1 z1 +bk2 z2 ) ≤ 3(OPT +k 0 z2 )−3k 0 z2 +3ak1 δz ≤ (3+)OPT .
The second inequality follows since 0 ≤ z2 − z1 ≤ δz .
0 , k 0 ) returns a feasible solution F, {rad(i)} with cost(F ) ≤ 6.183 +
Theorem
2.5. k-BSAlg(D0 , L
O() · OPT + O(R∗ ) where (i, rad(i))}i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 is a set of non-intersecting pairs.
Proof. The radii {rad(i)}i∈µ(F ) are simply the radii obtained from some execution of PDAlg, so
(i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 and comprises non-intersecting pairs. If k-BSAlg terminates in step B1, we have
argued a better bound on cost(F ). If not, and we return F2 , the cost incurred is C2 .
Otherwise, we return the solution F 0 found in step B2. Since (C-P) has only one constraint in addition
to the bound constraints 0 ≤ xi,r ≤ 1, the extreme-point
x∗ has at most
one fractional
P optimal solution
∗
component, and if it has a fractional component, then (i,r)∈F2 xi,r + |Si,r |(1 − x∗i,r ) = k 0 . For any
(i, r) ∈ F2 with x∗i,r ∈ {0, 1}, the number of pairs we include is exactly x∗i,r + |Si,r |(1 − x∗i,r ), and the total
cost of these pairs is at most the contribution to the objective function of (C-P) from the x∗i,r and (1 − x∗i,r )
8
terms. If x∗ has a fractional component (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F2 , then x∗i0 ,r0 + |Si0 ,r0 |(1 − x∗i0 ,r0 ) is a positive integer.
Since we include at most one pair for (i0 , r0 ), this implies that |F 0 | ≤ k 0 . The cost of the pair we include is
at most 15R∗ , since all (i, r) ∈ F1 ∪ F2 satisfy r ≤ 3R∗ . Therefore, cost(F 0 ) ≤ OPT C-P + 15R∗ . Also,
OPT C-P ≤ 2bC2 + (2b + a)C1 = 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 , since setting xi,r = b for all (i, r) ∈ F2 yields a
feasible solution to (C-P) of this cost.
So when we terminate in step B3, we return a solution F with cost(F ) ≤ min{C2 , 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 +
15R∗ }. The following claim (Claim 2.6) shows that min{C2 , 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 } ≤ 2.0607(aC1 + bC2 ) for
all a, b ≥ 0 with a + b = 1. Combining this with Claim 2.4 yields the bound in the theorem.
Claim 2.6. min{C2 , 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 } ≤ ( 3b2b+1
)(aC1 + bC2 ) ≤ 2.0607(aC1 + bC2 ) for all a, b ≥ 0
−2b+1
such that a + b = 1.
Proof. Since the minimum is less than any convex combination,
min(C2 , 2bC2 + bC1 + C1 ) ≤
=
3b2 − b
1−b
C2 + 2
(2bC2 + bC1 + C1 )
2
3b − 2b + 1
3b − 2b + 1
(1 − b)(1 + b)
b2 + b
b+1
C1 + 2
C2 = 2
((1 − b)C1 + bC2 )
2
3b − 2b + 1
3b − 2b + 1
3b − 2b + 1
Since a = 1 − b, the first inequality in the claim follows.√
3
The expression 3b2b+1
≈ 2.0607, which yields
is maximized at b = −1 + 2, and has value 1 + 2√
−2b+1
2
the second inequality in the claim.
Now we have all the ingredients needed for proving the main theorem of this section.
Proof of Theorem 2.2. It suffices to show that when the selection F O = {(i1 , r1 ), . . . (it , rt )} in step A1
corresponds to the t facilities in an optimal solution with largest radii, we obtain the desired approximation
∗
bound. In this case, if t = k, then F O is an optimal solution. Otherwise, t ≥ 1 , so we have R∗ ≤ Ot ≤ O∗
P
and OPT ≤ O∗ − tp=1 rp . Combining Theorem 2.5 and Lemma 2.1 then yields the theorem.
Improved approximation ratio. The improved approximation ratio comes from a better way of combining F1 and F2 in step B2. The idea is that we can ensure that the dual solutions α1 and α2 are componentwise quite close to each other by setting δz in the binary-search procedure to be sufficently small. Thus,
we may essentially assume that if T1,I , T2,I denote the tight pairs yielding F1 , F2 respectively, then every
pair in T1,I intersects some pair in T2,I , because we can augment T2,I to include non-intersecting pairs of
T1,I . This yields dividends when we combine solutions as in step B2, because we can now ensure that if
π(i0 , r0 ) = (i, r), then the pairs of T2,I and T1,I yielding (i, r) and (i0 , r0 ) respectively intersect, which
yields an improved bound on ci,i0 . This yields an improved approximation of 3.83 for the combination step
(Lemma A.4), and hence for the entire algorithm (Theorem 2.7); we defer the details to Appendix A.
Theorem 2.7. For any > 0, our algorithm returns a feasible LBkSR-solution of cost at most (3.83 +
O())O∗ in time nO(1/) .
2.2
Approximation algorithm for LBkSRO
We now build upon the ideas in Section 2.1 to devise an O(1)-approximation algorithm for the outlier
version LBkSR. The high-level approach is similar to the one in Section 2.1. We again “guess” the t (i, r)
pairs F O corresponding to the facilities with largest radii in an optimal solution, and consider the modified
k-BS-instance (D0 , L0 , k 0 , m) (where D0 , L0 , k 0 are defined as before). We design a primal-dual algorithm
for the Lagrangian relaxation of the k-BS-problem where we are allowed to pick any number of pairs from
9
L0 (leaving at most m uncovered clients) incurring a fixed cost of z for each pair picked, utilize this to obtain
two solutions F1 and F2 , and combine these to extract a low-cost solution. However, the presence of outliers
introduces various difficulties both in the primal-dual algorithm and in the combination step. We consider
the following LP-relaxation of the k-BS-problem and its dual (analogous to (P1 ) and (D1 )).
X
X
max
αj − k 0 · z − m · γ
(D2 )
min
r · yi,r
(P2 )
j∈D0
(i,r)∈L0
s.t.
X
yi,r + wj ≥ 1
∀j ∈ D0
s.t.
αj − z ≤ r
∀(i, r) ∈ L0
(3)
j∈B(i,r)∩D0
(i,r)∈L0 :j∈B(i,r)
X
X
yi,r ≤ k 0 ,
(i,r)∈L0
X
αj ≤ γ
wj ≤ m
∀j ∈ D0
α, z, γ ≥ 0.
j∈D0
y, w ≥ 0.
As before, if (P2 ) is infeasible, we reject this guess; so we assume (P2 ) is feasible in the remainder of this
section. Let OPT denote the optimal value of (P2 ). The natural modification of the earlier primal-dual
algorithm PDAlg is to now stop the dual-ascent process when the number of active clients is at most m
and set γ = maxj∈D0 αj . This introduces the significant complication that one may not be able to pay for
the (r + z)-cost of non-intersecting tight pairs selected in the pruning phase by the dual objective value
P
j∈D0 αj − m · γ, since clients with αj = γ may be needed to pay for both the r + z-cost of the last tight
pair f = (if , rf ) but their contribution gets canceled by the −m · γ term. This issue affects us in various
guises. First, we no longer obtain an LMP-approximation for the unconstrained problem since we have to
account for the (r + z)-cost of f separately. Second, unlike Claim 2.4, given solutions F1 and F2 obtained
via binary search for z1 , z2 ≈ z1 respectively with |F2 | ≤ k 0 < |F1 |, we now only obtain a fractional
k-BS-solution of cost O(OPT + z1 ). While one can modify the covering-knapsack-LP based procedure in
step B2 of k-BSAlg to combine F1 , F2 , this only yields a good solution when z1 = O(OPT ). The chief
technical difficulty is that z1 may however be much larger than OPT . Overcoming this obstacle requires
various novel ideas and is the key technical contribution of our algorithm. We design a second combination
procedure that is guaranteed to return a good solution when z1 = Ω(OPT ). This requires establishing
certain structural properties for F1 and F2 , using which we argue that one can find a good solution in the
neighborhood of F1 and F2 .
We now detail the changes to the primal-dual algorithm and k-BSAlg in Section 2.1 and analyze them
to prove Theorem 2.18, which states the performance guarantee we obtain for the modified k-BSAlg. As
before, for the right guess of F O , combining this with Lemma 2.1 immediately yields the following result.
Theorem 2.8. There exists a 12.365 + O() -approximation algorithm for LBkSRO that runs in time
nO(1/) for any > 0.
Modified primal-dual algorithm PDAlgo (D 0 , L0 , z). This is quite similar to PDAlg (and we again
return pairs from L). We stop the dual-ascent process when there are at most m active clients. We set
γ = maxj∈D0 αj . Let f = (if , rf ) be the last tight pair added to the tight-pair set T , and Bf = B(if , rf ).
We sometimes abuse notation and
S use (i, r) to also denote the singleton set {(i, r)}. For a set P of (i, r)
pairs, define uncov(P ) := D0 \ (i,r)∈P B(i, r). Note that |uncov(T \ f )| > m ≥ |uncov(T )|. Let Out be
a set of m clients such that uncov(T ) ⊆ Out ⊆ uncov(T \ f ). Note that αj = γ for all j ∈ Out.
The pruning phase is similar to before, but we only use f if necessary. Let TI be a maximal subset
of non-intersecting pairs picked by greedily scanning pairs in T \ f in non-increasing order of radius. For
i ∈ µ(TI ), set rad(i) to be the unique r such that (i, r) ∈ TI , and let ri be the smallest radius ρ such
that B(i, ρ) ⊇ B(i0 , r0 ) for every (i0 , r0 ) ∈ T \ f such that r0 ≤ rad(i) and (i0 , r0 ) intersects (i, rad(i)).
Let F 0 = {(i, ri )}i∈µ(TI ) . If uncov(F 0 ) ≤ m, set F = F 0 . If uncov(F 0 ) > m and ∃i ∈ µ(F 0 ) such
10
that c(i, if ) ≤ 2R∗ , then increase ri so that B(i, ri ) ⊇ Bf and let F be this updated F 0 . Otherwise, set
F = F ∪ f and rif = rad(if ) = rf . We return (F, f, Out, {rad(i)}i∈µ(F ) , α, γ). The proof of Theorem 2.9
dovetails the proof of Theorem 2.3.
Theorem 2.9. Let (F, f, Out, {rad(i)}, α, γ) = PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , z). Then
(i) uncov(F ) ≤ m,
P
(ii) cost(F \ f ) + 3|F \ f |z − 3R∗ ≤ 3( j∈D0 αj − mγ) ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z),
(iii) (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 , is a set of non-intersecting pairs, and rad(i) ≤ ri ≤ 3R∗ ∀i ∈ µ(F ),
(iv) if |F \ f | ≥ k 0 then cost(F ) ≤ 3 · OPT + 4R∗ , and if |F \ f | > k 0 then z ≤ OPT .
Proof. We first prove parts (i)–(iii). Let F 0 = {(i, ri0 )}i∈µ(TI ) be the set of pairs obtained from the set TI in
the pruning phase. By the same argument as in the proof of Theorem 2.3, we have ri0 ≤ 3rad(i) ≤ 3R∗ for
all i ∈ µ(TI ), and uncov(F 0 ) ⊆ uncov(T \ f ). If we return F = F 0 , then |uncov(F )| ≤ m by definition.
If uncov(F 0 ) > m and we increase the radius of some i ∈ µ(F 0 ) with c(i, if ) ≤ 2R∗ , then we have
ri ≤ max{ri0 , 3R∗ } ≤ 3R∗ and uncov(F ) ⊆ uncov(T ), so |uncov(F )| ≤ m. If f ∈ F , then we again have
uncov(F ) ⊆ uncov(T ). This proves part (i).
P
The above argument shows that cost(F \ f ) ≤ i∈µ(TI ) 3 · rad(i) + 3R∗ . All pairs in TI are tight and
non-intersecting and |F \ f | = |TI |. Also, Out ⊆ uncov(T \ f ) ⊆ uncov(TI ). (Recall that |Out| = m and
αj = γ for all j ∈ Out.) So
X
X
cost(F \ f ) + 3|F \ f |z − 3R∗ ≤
(3 · rad(i) + 3z) =
3αj
i∈µ(TI )
i∈µ(TI )
j∈B(i,rad(i))∩D0
X
X
X
≤3
αj −
αj = 3
αj − mγ ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z). (4)
j∈D0
j∈Out
j∈D0
The last inequality
follows since (α, γ, z) is a feasible solution to (D2 ). This proves part (ii).
Notice that (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) is TI if f ∈
/ F , and TI + f otherwise. In the latter case, we know that
∗
c(i, if ) > 2R for all i ∈ µ(TI ), so f does not intersect (i, rad(i)) for any i ∈ µ(TI ). Thus, all pairs in
(i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) are non-intersecting. The claim that rad(i) ≤ ri for all i ∈ µ(F ) follows from exactly
the same argument as that in the proof of Theorem 2.3.
Part (iv) follows from part (ii) and (4). The bound on cost(F
P ) follows from part (ii) since that cost(F ) ≤
cost(F \ f ) + R∗ . Inequality (4) implies that |F \ f |z ≤ i∈µ(TI ) (rad(i) + z) ≤ OPT + k 0 z, and so
z ≤ OPT if |F \ f | > k 0 .
Modified algorithm k-BSAlgo (D 0 , L0 , k0 , ). As before, we use binary search to find solutions F1 , F2
and extract a low-cost solution from these. The only changes to step B1 are as follows. We start with
z1 = 0 and z2 = 2nk 0 cmax ; for this z2 , we argue below that PDAlgo returns at most k 0 pairs. We stop
o
0
when z2 − z1 ≤ δz := OPT
3n2n . We do not stop even if PDAlg returns a solution (F, . . .) with |F | = k for
2
some z = z1 +z
2 , since Theorem 2.9 is not strong enough to bound cost(F ) even when this happens!. If
0
|F | > k , we update z1 ← z and the F1 -solution; otherwise, we update z2 ← z and the F2 -solution. Thus,
we maintain that k1 = |F1 | > k 0 , and k2 = |F2 | ≤ k 0 .
Claim 2.10. When z = z2 = 2nk 0 cmax , PDAlgo returns at most k 0 pairs.
Proof. Let (F, f, out, {rad(i)}i∈µ(F ) , α, γ) be the output of PDAlgo for this z. Let T be the sight of tight
pairs after the dual-ascent process. Observe that γ ≥ 2k 0 cmax , since for any tight pair (i, r) ∈ T , we have
11
P
P
that nγ ≥ j∈B(i,r)∩D0 αj ≥ z. We have j∈D0 αj − mγ ≤ OPT + k 0 z ≤ k 0 cmax + k 0 z. On the other
hand, since uncov(T \ f ) \ out 6= ∅ and αj = γ for all j ∈ uncov(T \ f ), we also have the lower bound
X
X
αj − mγ ≥
αj + γ ≥ |F \ f |z + γ.
j∈D0
i∈µ(F \f )
j∈B(i,rad(i))∩D0
So if |F | > k 0 , we arrive at the contradiction that γ ≤ k 0 cmax .
The main change is in the way solutions F1 , F2 are combined. We adapt step B2 to handle outliers (procedure A in Section 2.2.1), but the key extra ingredient is that we devise an alternate combination procedure
B (Section 2.2.2) that returns a low-cost solution when z1 = Ω(OPT ). We return the better of the solutions
output by the two procedures. We summarize these changes at the end in Algorithm k-BSAlgo (D0 , L0 , k 0 , )
and state the approximation bound for k-BSAlgo (Theorem 2.18). Combining this with Lemma 2.1 (for the
right selection of t (i, r) pairs) immediately yields Theorem 2.8.
We require the following continuity lemma, which is essentially Lemma 6.6 in [12]; we include a proof
in Appendix B for completeness.
Lemma 2.11. Let (Fp , . . . , αp , γ p ) = PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , zp ) for p = 1, 2, where 0 ≤ z2 − z1 ≤ δz . Then,
1
2
n
1
2
n
0
kα
P j − αj k∞ ≤p2 δz and |γ −n γ | ≤ 2 δz . Thus, if (3) is tight for some (i, r) ∈ L in one execution, then
j∈B(i,r)∩D0 αj ≥ r + z1 − 2 δz for p = 1, 2.
2.2.1
Combination subroutine A (F1 , rad1 ), (F2 , rad2 )
As in step B2, we cluster the F1 -pairs around F2 -pairs in stars. However, unlike before, some (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1
may remain unclustered and and we may not pick (i0 , r0 ) or some pair close to it. Since we do not cover all
clients covered by F1 , we need to cover a suitable number of clients from uncov(F1 ). We again setup an
LP to obtain a suitable collection of pairs. Let ucp denote uncov(Fp ) and Dp := D0 \ ucp for p = 1, 2. Let
π : F1 → F2 ∪ {∅} be defined as follows: for each (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 , if (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 intersects some F2 -pair,
pick such an intersecting (i, r) ∈ F2 and set π(i0 , r0 ) = (i, r); otherwise, set π(i0 , r0 ) = ∅. In the latter case,
(i0 , r0 ) is unclustered, and B(i0 , r0 ) ⊆ uc2 . Define Si,r = π −1 (i, r) for all (i, r) ∈ F2 . Let Q = π −1 (∅).
Let {uc1 (i, r)}(i,r)∈F2 be a partition of uc1 ∩ D2 such that uc1 (i, r) ⊆ uc1 ∩ B(i, r) for all (i, r) ∈ F2 .
Similarly, let {uc2 (i0 , r0 )}(i0 ,r0 )∈F1 be a partition of uc2 ∩ D1 such that uc2 (i0 , r0 ) ⊆ uc2 ∩ B(i0 , r0 ) for all
(i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 . We consider the following 2-dimensional covering knapsack LP.
X
X
P
P
min
xi,r (2r + (i0 ,r0 )∈Si,r 2r0 ) + (1 − xi,r ) (i0 ,r0 )∈Si,r r0 +
qi0 ,r0 · r0
(2C-P)
(i0 ,r0 )∈Q
(i,r)∈F2
X
s.t.
xi,r + |Si,r |(1 − xi,r ) +
(i,r)∈F2
(1 − xi,r )|uc1 (i, r)| +
qi0 ,r0 ≤ k
(5)
(i0 ,r0 )∈Q
(i,r)∈F2
X
X
X
(1 − qi0 ,r0 )|uc2 (i0 , r0 )| ≤ m − |uc1 ∩ uc2 |
(6)
(i0 ,r0 )∈Q
0 ≤ xi,r ≤ 1
∀(i, r) ∈ F2 ,
0 ≤ qi0 ,r0 ≤ 1
∀(i0 , r0 ) ∈ Q.
The interpretation of the variable xi,r is similar to before. If xi,r = 0, or xi,r = 1, Si,r 6= ∅, we proceed
as in step B2 (i.e., select all pairs in Si,r , or pick some (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Si,r and expand its radius suitably). But
if xi,r = 1, Si,r = ∅, then we may also pick (i, r) (see Theorem 2.14). Variable qi0 ,r0 indicates if we pick
(i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 . The number of uncovered clients in such a solution is at most |uc1 ∩ uc2 | + (LHS of (6)), and
(6) enforces that this is at most m.
12
Let (x∗ , q ∗ ) be an extreme-point optimal solution to (2C-P). The number of fractional components in
is at most the number of tight constraints from (5), (6). We exploit this to round (x∗ , q ∗ ) to an
integer solution (x̃, q̃) of good objective value (Lemma 2.13), and then use (x̃, q̃) to extract a good set of
pairs as sketched above (Theorem 2.14). Recall that k1 = |F1 |, k2 = |F2 |. Let a, b ≥ 0 be such that
ak1 + bk2 = k 0 , a + b = 1. Let C1 = cost(F1 ) and C2 = cost(F2 ).
(x∗ , q ∗ )
Lemma 2.12. The following hold.
(i) aC1 + bC2 ≤ (3 + )OPT + 4R∗ + 3z1 ,
(ii) OPT2C-P ≤ 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 .
Proof. Part (i) follows easily from part (ii) of Theorem 2.9 and since cost(Fp ) ≤ cost(Fp \ fp ) + R∗ for p =
1, 2. So we have C1 + 3(k1 − 1)z1 ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z1 ) + 4R∗ and C2 + 3(k2 − 1)z2 ≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z2 ) + 4R∗ .
Combining these, we obtain
aC1 + bC2 ≤ 3OPT + 3k 0 (az1 + bz2 ) − 3(ak1 z1 + bk2 z2 ) + 3(az1 + bz2 ) + 4R∗
≤ 3(OPT + k 0 z2 ) − 3k 0 z2 + 3ak1 δz + 3z1 + 3bδz + 4R∗
≤ (3 + )OPT + 4R∗ + 3z1 .
The second inequality follows since 0 ≤ z2 − z1 ≤ δz .
For part (ii), we claim that setting xi,r = b for all (i, r) ∈ F2 , and qi0 ,r0 = a for all (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Q yields
0
a feasible solution to (2C-P). The
P LHS of (5) evaluates to ak1 + bk2 , which is exactly k . The first term on
the LHS of (6) evaluates to a (i,r)∈F2 |uc1 (i, r)| = a|uc1 ∩ D2 | = a|uc1 \ uc2 | since {uc1 (i, r)}(i,r)∈F2
is a partition of uc1 ∩ D2 . Similarly, the second term on the LHS of (6) evaluates to at most b|uc2 ∩ D1 | =
b|uc2 \ uc1 |. So we have
(LHS of (6)) + |uc1 ∩ uc2 | = a|uc1 | + b|uc2 | ≤ m
since |uc1 |, |uc2 | ≤ m. The objective value of this solution is 2bC2 + 2bC1 + (1 − b)C1 = 2bC2 + (1 +
b)C1 .
Let P = {(i, r) ∈ F2 : Si,r = ∅}.
Lemma 2.13. (x∗ , q ∗ ) can be rounded to a feasible integer solution (x̃, q̃) to (2C-P) of objective value at
most OPT2C-P + O(R∗ ).
Proof. Let S be the set of fractional components of (x∗ , q ∗ ). As noted earlier, |S| is at most the number of
tight constraints from (5), (6). Let
X
X
l∗ :=
x∗i,r + |Si,r |(1 − x∗i,r ) +
qi∗0 ,r0
(i0 ,r0 )∈S∩Q
(i,r)∈S∩F2
denote the contribution of the fractional components of (x∗ , q ∗ ) to the LHS of (5). Note that if (5) is tight,
then l∗ must be an integer. For a vector v = (vj )j∈I where I is some index-set, let dve denote dvj e j∈I .
We round (x∗ , q ∗ ) as follows.
• If l∗ ≥ 2 or |S| ≤ 1 or |S ∩ (F2 \ P)| ≥ 1, set (x̃, q̃) = d(x∗ , q ∗ )e.
• Otherwise, we set x̃i,r = x∗i,r , q̃i0 ,r0 = qi∗0 ,r0 for all the integer-valued coordinates. We set the fractional
component with larger absolute coefficient value on the LHS of (6) equal to 1 and the other fractional
component to 0.
13
We prove that (x̃, q̃) is a feasible solution to (2C-P). Note that (6) holds for (x̃, q̃) since we always have
X
X
(1 − q̃i0 ,r0 )|uc2 (i0 , r0 )|
(1 − x̃i,r )|uc1 (i, r)| +
(i0 ,r0 )∈Q
(i,r)∈F2
≤
X
(1 − x∗i,r )|uc1 (i, r)| +
X
(1 − qi∗0 ,r0 )|uc2 (i0 , r0 )|.
(i0 ,r0 )∈Q
(i,r)∈F2
Clearly, the contribution to the LHS of (5) from the components not in S is the same in both (x̃, q̃) and
(x∗ , q ∗ ). Let l denote the contribution from (x̃, q̃) to the LHS of (5) from the components in S. Clearly, l is
an integer.
If l∗ ≥ 2, then l = 2. If |S| ≤ 1, then l = 1. If l∗ ≥ 1, then in these cases the LHS of (5) evaluated
at (x̃, q̃) is at most the LHS of (5) evaluated at (x∗ , q ∗ ). If l∗ < 1 and |S| ≤ 1 (so l = 1), then since l∗
is fractional, we know that (5) is not tight for (x∗ , q ∗ ). So despite the increase in LHS of (5), we have that
(5) holds for (x̃, q̃). If |S| = 2 and |S ∩ (F2 \ P)| ≥ 1, then we actually have l∗ > 1 and l = 2. Again,
since l∗ is fractional, we can conclude that (x̃, q̃) satisfies (5) despite the increase in LHS of (5). Finally,
suppose
l∗ < 2, |S|
P
P = 2, and S ∩ (F2 \ P) = ∅. Then the contribution from S to the LHS of (5) is
x
+
(i,r)∈S∩F2 i,r
(i0 ,r0 )∈S∩Q qi0 ,r0 , and at most one of the components in S is set to 1 in (x̃, q̃). So l = 1,
∗
∗
and either l ≤ l or l < 1, and in both cases (5) holds for (x̃, q̃).
To bound the objective value of (x̃, q̃), notice that compared to (x∗ , q ∗ ), the solution (x̃, q̃) pays extra
only for the components that are rounded up. There are at most two such components, and their objectivefunction coefficients are bounded by 15R∗ , so the objective value of (x̃, q̃) is at most OPT2C-P + 30R∗ .
Theorem 2.14. The integer solution (x̃, q̃) returnedby Lemma 2.13 yields a solution
F,
{rad(i)}
to
i∈µ(F
)
∗
the k-BS-problem with cost(F ) ≤ 6.1821 + O() (OPT + z1 ) + O(R ) where (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0
is a set of non-intersecting pairs.
Proof. Unlike in step B2 of k-BSAlg, we will not simply pick a subset of pairs of F1 and expand their radii.
We will sometimes need to pick pairs from F2 in order to ensure that we have at most m outliers, but we
need to be careful in doing so because we also need to find suitable radii for the facilities we pick so that we
obtain non-intersecting pairs.
We first construct F 00 as follows. If q̃i0 ,r0 = 1, we include (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F 00 and set rad(i0 ) = rad1 (i0 ). If
x̃i,r = 0, we include all pairs in Si,r in F 00 and set rad(i0 ) = rad1 (i0 ) for all (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Si,r . If x̃i,r = 1
and Si,r 6= ∅, we pick a pair in (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Si,r , and include (i0 , 2r + r0 + max(i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r \{(i0 ,r0 )} 2r00 ) in F 00 .
We set rad(i0 ) = rad1 (i0 ). Now we initialize F 0 = F 00 and consider all (i, r) ∈ P with x̃i,r = 1. If (i, r)
does not intersect any (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F 00 then we add (i, r) to F 0 , and set rad(i) = rad2 (i). Otherwise, if (i, r)
intersects some (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F 00 , then we replace (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F 0 with (i0 , r0 + 2r). We have thus ensured that
(i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F 0 ) ⊆ L0 and consists of non-intersecting pairs. Note that in all the cases above, the total
cost of the pairs we include when we process some q̃i0 ,r0 or x̃i,r term is at most the total contribution to the
objective function from the q̃i0 ,r0 term, or the x̃i,r and 1 − x̃i,r terms. Therefore, cost(F 0 ) is at most the
objective value of (x̃, q̃). Finally, we argue that |uncov(F 0 )| ≤ m. We have |uncov(F 0 )| ≤ |uc1 ∩ uc2 | +
|uncov(F 0 ) ∩ D1 | + |uncov(F 0 ) ∩ D2 ∩ uc1 |. Observe that for every client j ∈ uncov(F 0 ) ∩ D1 and every
0 , r0 )
(i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 such that j ∈ B(i0 , r0 ), it must be that (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Q and q̃i0 ,r0 =
P0. It follows that j ∈ uc2 (i
0
0
0
0
for some (i , r ) ∈ Q with q̃i0 ,r0 = 0. Therefore, |uncov(F ) ∩ D1 | ≤ (i0 ,r0 )∈Q (1 − q̃i0 ,r0 )|uc2 (i , r0 )|.
Similarly, for every j ∈ uncov(F 0 ) ∩ D2 ∩ uc1 and every (i, r) ∈ F2 such that j ∈ B(i, r), we must
have (i, r) ∈ P and x̃i,r P
= 0; hence, j ∈ uc1 (i, r) for some (i, r) ∈ P with x̃i,r = 0. Therefore,
0
|uncov(F ) ∩ D2 ∩ uc1 | ≤ (i,r)∈P (1 − x̃i,r )|uc1 (i, r)|. Thus, since (x̃, q̃) is feasible, constraint (6) implies
that |uncov(F 0 )| ≤ m.
We return (F2 , rad2 ) if cost(F2 ) ≤ cost(F 0 ), and F 0 , {rad(i)}i∈µ(F 0 ) otherwise. Combining the
above bound on cost(F 0 ) with part (ii) of Lemma 2.12 and Lemma 2.13, we obtain that the cost of the
14
solution returned is at most
min C2 , 2bC2 + (1 + b)C1 + 30R∗ ≤ 2.0607 aC1 + bC2 + 30R∗
≤ 2.0607 (3 + )OPT + 4R∗ + 3z1 + 30R∗ ≤ (6.1821 + 3)(OPT + z1 ) + 39R∗ .
The first inequality follows from Claim 2.6, and the second follows from part (i) of Lemma 2.12.
2.2.2
Subroutine B (F1 , f1 , Out 1 , rad1 , α1 , γ 1 ), (F2 , f2 , Out 2 , rad2 , α2 , γ 2 )
Subroutine A in the previous section yields a low-cost solution only if z1 = O(OPT ). We complement
subroutine A by now describing a procedure that returns a good solution when z1 is large. We assume in
this section that z1 > (1 + )OPT . Then |F1 \ f1 | ≤ k 0 (otherwise z1 ≤ OPT by part (iv) of Theorem 2.9),
so |F1 \ f1 | ≤ k 0 < |F1 |, which means that k1 = k 0 + 1 and f1 ∈ F1 . Hence, αj1 = γ 1 for all j ∈ Bf1 ∩ D0 .
First, we take
care of some simple cases. If there exists (i, r) ∈ F1 \f1 such that |uncov F1 \{f1 , (i, r)}∪
(i, r + 12R∗ ) | ≤ m, then set F = F1 \ {f1 , (i, r)} ∪ (i, r + 12R∗ ). We have cost(F ) = cost(F1 \
f1 ) + 12R∗ ≤ 3 · OPT + 15R∗ (by part (ii) of Theorem 2.9). If there exist pairs (i, r), (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1
such that c(i, i0 ) ≤ 12R∗ , take r00 to be the minimum ρ ≥ r such that B(i0 , r0 ) ⊆ B(i, ρ) and set F =
∗
∗
F1 \ {(i, r), (i0 , r0 )} ∪ (i, r00 ). We
have cost(F ) ≤ cost(F1 \ f1 ) + 13R ≤ 3 · OPT + 16R . In both cases,
we return F, {rad1 (i)}i∈µ(F ) .
So we assume in the sequel that neither
of the above apply. In particular, all pairs in F1 are wellP
separated. Let AT = {(i, r) ∈ L0 : j∈B(i,r)∩D0 αj1 ≥ r + z1 − 2n δz } and AD = {j ∈ D0 : αj1 ≥
γ 1 − 2n δz }. By Lemma 2.11, AT includes the tight pairs of PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , zp ) for both p = 1, 2, and
Out 1 ∪ Out 2 ⊆ AD. Since the tight pairs T2 used for building solution F2 are almost tight in (α1 , γ 1 , z1 ),
we swap them in and swap out pairs from F1 one by one while maintaining a feasible solution. Either at
some point, we will be able to remove f , which will give us a solution of size k 0 , or we will obtain a bound
on cost(F2 ). The following lemma is our main tool for bounding the cost of the solution returned.
Lemma 2.15. Let F ⊆ L0 , and let TF = (i, ri0 ) i∈µ(F ) where ri0 ≤ r for each (i, r) ∈ F . Suppose
S
TF ⊆ AT and pairs in TF are non-intersecting. If |F | ≥ k 0 and |AD \ (i,r)∈F B(i, r))| ≥ m then
cost(TF ) ≤ (1 + )OPT . Moreover, if |F | > k 0 then z1 ≤ (1 + )OPT .
S
Proof. Let Out F be a subset of exactly m of clients from AD \ (i,r)∈F B(i, r). Since the pairs in TF are
P
P
non-intersecting and almost tight, i∈µ(F ) (ri0 + z1 ) ≤ j∈D0 \Out F (αj1 + 2n δz ), so
X
i∈µ(F )
(ri0 +z1 ) ≤
X
j∈D0
(αj1 +2n δz )−m(γ 1 −2n δz ) ≤
X
αj1 −mγ 1 +(m+|D0 |)2n δz ≤ (1+)OPT +k 0 z1
j∈D0
where the last inequality follows since (α1 , γ 1 , z1 ) is a feasible solution to (D2 ). So cost(TF ) ≤ (1+)OPT
if |TF | = |F | ≥ k 0 , and z1 ≤ (1 + )OPT if |F | > k 0 .
Define a mapping ψ : F2 → F1 \ f1 as follows. Note that any (i, r) ∈ F2 may intersect with at most one
F1 -pair: if it intersects (i0 , r0 ), (i00 , r00 ) ∈ F1 , then we have c(i0 , i00 ) ≤ 12R∗ . First, for each (i, r) ∈ F2 that
intersects with some (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 , we set ψ(i, r) = (i0 , r0 ). Let M ⊆ F2 be the F2 -pairs mapped by ψ this
way. For every (i, r) ∈ F2 \ M , we arbitrarily match (i, r) with a distinct (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 \ ψ(M ). We claim
that ψ is in fact a one-one function.
Lemma 2.16. Every (i, r) ∈ F1 \ f1 intersects with at most one F2 -pair.
15
Proof. Suppose two pairs (i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 ) ∈ F2 intersect with a common pair (i, r) ∈ F1 \ f1 . Let T1,I
be the tight pairs corresponding to F1 \ f1 obtained from (the pruning phase of) PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , z1 ). Let
(i, rad1 (i)) ∈ T1,I be the tight pair corresponding to (i, r). Let (i1 , rad2 (i1 )), (i2 , rad2 (i2 )) be the tight pairs
corresponding to (i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 ) obtained from PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , z2 ). Let F 00 = F1 \ {f1 , (i, r)} ∪ (i, r +
12R∗ ). We show that either z1 ≤ OPT or |uncov(F 00 )| ≤ m, both of which lead to a contradiction.
Define F 0 = F1 \ {f1 , (i, r)} ∪ {(i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 )}, so |F 0 | = k + 1. Consider the set TF 0 = T1,I \
{(i, rad1 (i))} ∪ {(i1 , rad2 (i1 )), (i2 , rad2 (i2 ))}. Since (i1 , rad2 (i1 ) and (i2 , rad2 (i2 )) are non-intersecting
and they do not intersect with any pair in TS1,I \ (i, rad1 (i)), the pairs in TF 0 are non-intersecting. Also,
TF 0 ⊆ AT . If |AD ∩ uncov(F 0 )| = |AD \ (i0 ,r0 )∈F 0 B(i0 , r0 )| ≥ m, then z1 ≤ OPT by Lemma 2.15.
Otherwise, note that every client in B(i1 , r1 ) ∪ B(i2 , r2 ) is at distance at most r + 2 max{r1 , r2 } ≤
r + 6R∗ from i. So we have uncov(F 00 ) ⊆ uncov(F ) ∪ Bf1 ⊆ AD and uncov(F 00 ) ⊆ uncov(F 0 ). So
|uncov(F 00 )| ≤ |AD ∩ uncov(F 0 )| ≤ m.
Let F20 be the pairs (i, r) ∈ F2 such that if (i0 , r0 ) = ψ(i, r), then r0 < r. Let P = F20 ∩ M and
Q = F20 \ M . For every (i0 , r0 ) ∈ ψ(Q) and j ∈ B(i0 , r0 ), we have j ∈ uncov(F2 ) ⊆ AD (else (i0 , r0 )
would lie in ψ(M )). Starting with F = F1 \ f1 , we iterate over (i, r) ∈ F20 and do the following. Let
(i0 , r0 ) = ψ(i, r). If (i, r) ∈ P , we update F ← F \ (i0 , r0 ) ∪ (i, r + 2r0 ) (so B(i, r + 2r0 ) ⊇ B(i0 , r0 )),
else we update F ← F \ (i0 , r0 ) ∪ (i, r). Let TF = {(i, rad1 (i))}(i,r)∈F ∩F1 ∪ {(i, rad2 (i))}(i,r)∈F \F1 . Note
that |F | = k 0 and uncov(F ) ⊆ AD at all times. Also, since (i, r) intersects only (i0 , r0 ), which we remove
when (i, r) is added, we maintain that TF is a collection of non-intersecting pairs and a subset of AT ⊆ L0 .
This process continues until |uncov(F )| ≤ m, or when all pairs of F20 are swapped in. In the former case,
we argue that cost(F ) is small and return F, {rad1 (i)}(i,r)∈F ∩F1 ∪ {rad2 (i)}(i,r)∈F \F1 . In the latter case,
we show that cost(F20 ), and hence cost(F2 ) is small, and return (F2 , rad2 ).
Lemma 2.17. (i) If the algorithm stops with |uncov(F )| ≤ m, then cost(F ) ≤ (9 + 3)OPT + 18R∗ .
(ii) If case (i) does not apply, then cost(F2 ) ≤ (3 + 3)OPT + 9R∗ .
(iii) The pairs corresponding to the radii returned are non-intersecting and form a subset of L0 .
Proof. Part (iii) follows readily from the algorithm description and the discussion above. Consider part (i).
Let (i, r) ∈ F20 be the last pair scanned by the algorithm before it terminates, and (i0 , r0 ) = ψ(i, r). Let F 0 be
the set F before the last iteration. So F 0 = F \ (i, r + 2r0 ) ∪ (i0 , r0 ) if (i, r) ∈ P , and F 0 = F \ (i, r) ∪ (i0 , r0 )
if (i, r) ∈ Q. Note that r + 2r0 ≤ 9R∗ . Since uncov(F 0 ) ⊆ AD and |uncov(F 0 )| > m, by Lemma 2.15,
we have cost(TF 0 ) ≤ (1 + )OPT . For all (i, r) ∈ F1 , we have r ≤ 3rad1 (i) (since f1 ∈ F1 ). For all
but at most one (i, r) ∈ F2 , we have r ≤ 3rad2 (i) and for the one possible exception, we have r ≤ 3R∗ .
Therefore,
cost(F ) ≤ cost(F 0 ∩ F1 ) + cost(F 0 \ F1 ) + 9R∗ ≤ 3 · cost(TF 0 ) + 3R∗ + 2 · cost(F1 \ F 0 ) + 9R∗
≤ 3(1 + )OPT + 3R∗ + 2(3 · OPT + 3R∗ ) + 9R∗ = 9 + 3)OPT + 18R∗ .
P
The second inequality above follows since cost(F 0 ∩ F1 ) ≤ (i,r)∈F 0 ∩F1 3rad1 (i) and cost(F 0 \ F1 ) ≤
P
∗
0
(i,r)∈F 0 \F1 3rad2 (i) + 3R + 2cost(F1 \ F ).
Forpart (ii), Lemma 2.15 shows that cost(TF ) ≤ (1 + )OPT , and so cost(F20 ) + cost F1 \ (f1 ∪
ψ(F20 )) ≤ 3 · cost(TF ) + 3R∗ . Now
cost(F2 ) = cost(F20 ) + cost(F2 \ F20 ) ≤ cost(F20 ) + cost ψ(F2 \ F20 )
= cost(F20 ) + cost F1 \ (f1 ∪ ψ(F20 ) ≤ 3(1 + ) · OPT + 3R∗
where the first inequality follows by the definition of F20 .
16
Algorithm k-BSAlgo (D 0 , L0 , k0 , ). Output: F ⊆ L with |F | ≤ k 0 , a radius rad(i) for all i ∈ µ(F ).
C1. Binary search. Let (F1 , rad1 , . . .) = PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , 0). If |F1 | ≤ k 0 pairs, return (F1 , rad1 ). Else perform binary-search in the range [0, ncmax ] to find z1 , z2 with 0 ≤ z2 − z1 ≤ δz = OPT
3n2n such that letting
(Fp , fp , Out p , radp , αp , γ p ) = PDAlg(D0 , L0 , zp ) for p = 1, 2, we have |F2 | ≤ k 0 < |F1 |.
C2. Let FA , {radA (i)}i∈µ(FA ) = A (F1 , rad1 ), (F2 , rad2 ) (Section 2.2.1). If |F1 \ f1 | > k 0 , return (FA , radA ).
C3. If ∃(i, r) ∈ F1 \f1 such that |uncov F1 \{f1 , (i, r)}∪(i, r +12R∗ ) | ≤ m, then set F = F1 \{f1 , (i, r)}∪(i, r +
0 0
12R∗ ). If ∃(i, r), (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 such that c(i, i0 ) ≤ 12R∗ , let r00 be the minimum ρ ≥ r such that B(i
,r ) ⊆
0 0
00
B(i, ρ); set F = F1 \ {(i, r), (i , r )} ∪ (i, r ). If either of the above apply, return F, {rad1 (i)}i∈µ(F ) .
C4. Let FB , {radB (i)}i∈µ(FB ) be the output of subroutine B (Section 2.2.2).
C5. If cost(FA ) ≤ cost(FB ), return (FA , radA ), else return (FB , radB ).
Theorem 2.18. k-BSAlgo (D0 , L0 , k 0 ) returns a solution (F, rad) with cost(F ) ≤ 12.365 + O() · OPT +
O(R∗ ) where (i, rad(i)) i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 comprises non-intersecting pairs.
Proof. This follows essentially from Theorem 2.14 and Lemma 2.17. When z1 ≤ (1 + ) · OPT , Theorem 2.14 yields the above bound on cost(FA ). Otherwise, if none of the cases in step C3 apply, then
Lemma 2.17 bounds cost(FB ). In the boundary cases, when we terminate in step C1 or C3, we have
cost(F ) ≤ cost(F1 \ f1 ) + cost(f1 ) + 12R∗ , which is at most the expression in the theorem due to part (ii)
of Theorem 2.9.
3
Minimizing the maximum radius with lower bounds and outliers
The lower-bounded k-supplier with outliers (LBkSupO) problem is the min max-radius version of LBkSRO.
The input and the set of feasible
solutions are the same as in LBkSRO: the input is an
instance I =
F, D, {Li }, {c(i, j)}, k 0 , m , and a feasible solution is S ⊆ F, σ : D 7→ S ∪ {out} with |S| ≤ k,
|σ −1 (i)| ≥ Li for all i ∈ S, and |σ −1 (out)| ≤ m. The cost of (S, σ) is now maxi∈S maxj∈σ−1 (i) c(i, j).
The special case where m = 0 is called the lower-bounded k-supplier (LBkSup) problem, and the setting
where D = F is often called the k-center version.
Let τ ∗ denote the optimal value; note that there are only polynomially many choices for τ ∗ . As is
common in the study of min-max problems, we reduce the problem to a “graphical” instance, where given
some value τ , we try to find a solution of cost O(τ ) or deduce that τ ∗ > τ . We construct a bipartite
unweighted graph Gτ = Vτ = D ∪ Fτ , Eτ ), where Fτ = {i ∈ F : |B(i, τ )| ≥ Li }, and Eτ =
{ij : c(i, j) ≤ τ, i ∈ Fτ , j ∈ D}. Let dist τ (i, j) denote the shortest-path distance in Gτ between i
and j, so c(i, j) ≤ distτ (i, j) · τ . We say that an assignment σ : D 7→ Fτ ∪ {out} is a distance-α
assignment if dist τ (j, σ(j)) ≤ α for every client j with σ(j) 6= out. We call such an assignment feasible,
if it yields a feasible LBkSupO-solution, and we say that Gτ is feasible if it admits a feasible distance-1
assignment. It is not hard to see that given F ⊆ Fτ , the problem of finding a feasible distance-α-assignment
σ : D 7→ F ∪ {out} in Gτ (if one exists) can be solved by creating a network-flow instance with lower
bounds and capacities.
Observe that an optimal solution yields a feasible distance-1 assignment in Gτ ∗ . We devise an algorithm
that for every τ , either finds a feasible distance-α assignment in Gτ for some constant α, or detects that Gτ
is not feasible. This immediately yields an α-approximation algorithm since the smallest τ for which the
algorithm returns a feasible LBkSupO-solution must be at most τ ∗ . We obtain Theorems 3.1 and 3.2 via
this template.
Theorem 3.1. There is a 3-approximation algorithm for LBkSup.
Theorem 3.2. There is a 5-approximation algorithm for LBkSupO.
17
We complement our approximation results via a simple hardness result (Theorem 3.3) showing that our
approximation factor for LBkSup is tight. We also show that LBkSupO is equivalent to the k-center version
(i.e., where F = D) of the problem (Appendix C); a similar equivalence is known to hold for the capacitated
versions of k-supplier and k-center with outliers [15].
Theorem 3.3. It is NP-hard to approximate LBkSup within a factor better than 3, unless P = N P .
Proof. The result is shown via a reduction from set cover problem. Suppose we have a set cover instance
0
with set U = [n] of elements and collection S = ∪np=1 {Sp } of subsets of U, and we want to know if
there exists k subsets of U in S that cover all elements of U. Let j1 , j2 , · · · , jn represent the elements and
i1 , i2 , · · · , in0 represent subsets of U in S. Construct an LBkSup instance I with client set D = ∪np=1 {jp },
0
facility set F = ∪nq=1 {iq }, define c(jp , iq ) for jp ∈ D, iq ∈ F to be 1 if p ∈ Sq , 3 otherwise, and let Li = 1
for each i ∈ F. Suppose there exists a collection F of k subsets in S that cover all elements. First, remove
any set i in F , if i does not cover an element that is not covered by F \ i. Let σ : D → F be defined
for element j to be some set in F that covers j. Since each set i in F covers at least one element that is
not covered by F \ i, |σ −1 (i)| ≥ 1, so (F, σ) is a feasible solution to I with radius 1. If no collection
of k subsets of U in S covers all elements, then there does not exist k facilities in F that all elements
are at distance at most 1 from them, so optimal solution of I has cost at least 3. Therefore, it is NP-hard
to approximate LBkSup with a factor better than 3 as otherwise the algorithm can be used to answer the
decision problem.
Finding a distance-3 assignment for LBkSup. Consider the graph Gτ ∗ . Note that there exists an optimal
center among the neighbors of each client in G. Moreover, two clients at distance at least 3 are served by
two distinct centers. These insights motivate the following algorithm.
Let N (v) denote the neighbors of vertex v in the given graph Gτ . Find a maximal subset Γ of clients
with distance at least 3 from each other. If |Γ| > k or there exists a client j with N (j) = ∅, then return Gτ
is not feasible. For each j ∈ Γ, let ij denote the center
S in N (j) with minimum lower bound. If there exists a
feasible distance-3 assignment σ of clients to F = j∈Γ {ij }, return σ, otherwise return Gτ is not feasible.
The following lemma yields Theorem 3.1.
Lemma 3.4. The above algorithm finds a feasible distance-3 assignment in Gτ if Gτ is feasible.
Proof. Let σ ∗ : D 7→ F ∗ be a feasible distance-1 assignment in Gτ . So F ∗ ⊆ Fτ and every client has a
non-empty neighbor set. Since each client in Γ has to be served by a distinct center in F ∗ , |Γ| ≤ |F ∗ | ≤ k.
For each client j ∈ Γ, let i∗j = σ ∗ (j). Note that i∗j ∈ N (j), so Lij ≤ Li∗j by the choice of ij , and every
client in σ ∗−1 (i∗j ) is at distance at most 3 from ij .
We show that there is a feasible distance-3 assignment σ : D 7→ F . For each j ∈ Γ, we assign all
clients in σ ∗−1 (i∗j ) to ij . As argued above this satisfies the lower bound of ij . For any unassigned client j,
let j 0 ∈ Γ be a client at distance at most 2 from j (which must exist by maximality of Γ). We assign j to
ij 0 .
Finding a distance-5 assignment for LBkSupO. The main idea here is to find a set F ⊆ Fτ of at most
k centers that are close to the centers in F ∗ ⊆ Fτ for some feasible distance-1 assignment σ ∗ : D 7→
F ∗ ∪ {out} in Gτ . The non-outlier clients of (F ∗ , σ ∗ ) are close to F , so there are at least |D| − m clients
close to F . If centers in F do not share a neighbor in Gτ , then clients in N (i) can be assigned to i for each
i ∈ F to satisfy the lower bounds. We cannot check if F satisfies the above properties, but using an idea
similar to that in [15], we will find a sequence of facility sets such that at least one of these sets will have
the desired properties when Gτ is feasible.
18
Definition 3.5. Given the bipartite graph Gτ , a set F ⊆ F is called a skeleton if it satisfies the following
properties.
(a) (Separation property) For i, i0 ∈ F , i 6= i0 , we have dist τ (i, i0 ) ≥ 6;
(b) There exists a feasible distance-1 assignment σ ∗ : D 7→ F ∗ ∪ {out} in Gτ such that
• (Covering property) For all i∗ ∈ F ∗ , dist τ (i∗ , F ) ≤ 4, where dist τ (i∗ , F ) = mini∈F dist τ (i∗ , i).
• (Injection property) There exists f : F 7→ F ∗ such that dist τ (i, f (i)) ≤ 2 for all i ∈ F .
If F satisfies the separation and injection properties, it is called a pre-skeleton.
Note that if F ⊆ Fτ is a skeleton or pre-skeleton, then Gτ is feasible. Suppose F ⊆ Fτ is a skeleton and
satisfies the properties with respect to a feasible distance-1 assignment (F ∗ , σ ∗ ). The separation property
ensures that the neighbor sets of any two locations i, i0 ∈ F are disjoint. The covering property ensures
that F ∗ is at distance at most 4 from F , so there are at least |D| − m clients at distance at most 5 from F .
Finally, the injection and separation properties together ensure that |F | ≤ k since no two locations in F can
be mapped to the same location in F ∗ . Thus, if F is a skeleton, then we can obtain a feasible distance-5
assignment σ : D 7→ F ∪ {out}.
Lemma 3.6. Let F be a pre-skeleton in Gτ . Define U = {i ∈ Fτ : dist τ (i, F ) ≥ 6} and let i =
arg maxi0 ∈U |N (i0 )|. Then, either F is a skeleton, or F ∪ {i} is a pre-skeleton.
Proof. Suppose F is not a skeleton and F ∪ {i} is not a pre-skeleton. Let σ ∗ : D 7→ F ∗ ∪ {out} be a
feasible distance-1 assignment in Gτ such F satisfies the injection property with respect to (F ∗ , σ ∗ ). Let
f : F 7→ F ∗ be the mapping given by the injection property. Since F ∪ {i} is not a pre-skeleton and
dist τ (i, F ) ≥ 6, this implies that dist τ (i, F ∗ ) > 2, and hence, dist τ (i, F ∗ ) ≥ 4 as Gτ is bipartite. This
means that all clients in N (i) are outliers in (F ∗ , σ ∗ ). Moreover, since F is not a skeleton, there exists a
center i∗ ∈ F ∗ with dist τ (i∗ , F ) > 4, and so dist(i∗ , F ) ≥ 6. Therefore, i∗ ∈ U . By the choice of i, we
know that |N (i)| ≥ |N (i∗ )|. Now consider F 0 = F ∗ \{i∗ }∪{i}, and define σ 0 : D 7→ F 0 ∪{out} as follows:
σ 0 (j) = σ ∗ (j) for all j ∈
/ N (i) ∪ N (i∗ ), σ 0 (j) = i for all j ∈ N (i), and σ 0 (j) = out for all j ∈ N (i∗ ).
Note that the F covers as many clients as F ∗ , and so σ 0 : D 7→ F 0 ∪ {out} is another feasible distance-1
assignment. But this yields a contradiction since F ∪ {i} now satisfies the injection property with respect to
(F 0 , σ 0 ) as certified by the function f 0 : F → F 0 defined by f 0 (s) = f (s) for s ∈ F , f 0 (i) = i.
If Gτ is feasible, then ∅ is a pre-skeleton. A skeleton can have size at most k. So using Lemma 3.6, we
can find a sequence F 0 of at most k + 1 subsets of Fτ by starting with ∅ and repeatedly applying Lemma 3.6
until we either have a set of size k or the set U in Lemma 3.6 is empty. By Lemma 3.6, if Gτ is feasible
then one of these sets must be a skeleton. So for each F ∈ F 0 , we check if there exists a feasible distance-5
assignment σ : D 7→ F ∪ {out}, and if so, return (F, σ). Otherwise we return that Gτ is not feasible.
Acknowledgment
Part of this work was carried out while the authors were visiting the Hausdorff Institute of Mathematics
(HIM) in Bonn, Germany, as part of the HIM Trimester Program on Combinatorial Optimization. We thank
the organizers of the trimester program, and HIM for their support and generous hospitality.
References
[1] Gagan Aggarwal, Tomás Feder, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Samir Khuller, Rina Panigrahy, Dilys
Thomas, and An Zhu. Achieving anonymity via clustering. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG),
6(3):49, 2010.
19
[2] Gagan Aggarwal, Tomás Feder, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Rajeev Motwani, Rina Panigrahy, Dilys
Thomas, and An Zhu. Approximation algorithms for k-anonymity. Journal of Privacy Technology
(JOPT), 2005.
[3] Sara Ahmadian and Chaitanya Swamy. Approximation guarantees for clustering problems with lower
bounds and outliers. In Proceedings of the 43rd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages
and Programming (ICALP), 2016.
[4] Sara Ahmadian and Chaitanya Swamy. Improved approximation guarantees for lower-bounded facility
location. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms
(WAOA), pages 257–271, 2012.
[5] Hyung-Chan An, Aditya Bhaskara, Chandra Chekuri, Shalmoli Gupta, Vivek Madan, and Ola Svensson. Centrality of trees for capacitated k-center. Mathematical Programming, 154(1-2):29–53, 2015.
[6] Babak Behsaz and Mohammad R. Salavatipour. On minimum sum of radii and diameters clustering.
Algorithmica, 73(1):143–165, 2015.
[7] Jarosław Byrka, Thomas Pensyl, Bartosz Rybicki, Aravind Srinivasan, and Khoa Trinh. An improved
approximation for k-median, and positive correlation in budgeted optimization. In Proceedings of the
26th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 737–756, 2015.
[8] Vasilis Capoyleas, Günter Rote, and Gerhard Woeginger. Geometric clusterings. Journal of Algorithms, 12(2):341–356, 1991.
[9] Moses Charikar and Sudipto Guha. Improved combinatorial algorithms for facility location problems.
SIAM Journal on Computing, 34(4):803–824, 2005.
[10] Moses Charikar, Sudipto Guha, Éva Tardos, and David B Shmoys. A constant-factor approximation
algorithm for the k-median problem. In Proceedings of the 31st annual ACM Symposium on Theory of
Computing (STOC), pages 1–10, 1999.
[11] Moses Charikar, Samir Khuller, David Mount, and Giri Narasimhan. Algorithms for facility location problems with outliers. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete
Algorithms (SODA), pages 642–651, 2001.
[12] Moses Charikar and Rina Panigrahy. Clustering to minimize the sum of cluster diameters. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 1–10, 2001.
[13] Ke Chen. A constant factor approximation algorithm for k-median clustering with outliers. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 826–835,
2008.
[14] Marek Cygan, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, and Samir Khuller. Lp rounding for k-centers with nonuniform hard capacities. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
Computer Science (FOCS), pages 273–282, 2012.
[15] Marek Cygan and Tomasz Kociumaka. Constant factor approximation for capacitated k-center with
outliers. In Proceedings of the 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer
Science (STACS), pages 251–262, 2014.
[16] Srinivas R Doddi, Madhav V Marathe, SS Ravi, David Scot Taylor, and Peter Widmayer. Approximation algorithms for clustering to minimize the sum of diameters. In Proceedings of the 11th Scandinavian Workshop on Algorithm Theory (SWAT), pages 237–250, 2000.
20
[17] Alina Ene, Sariel Har-Peled, and Benjamin Raichel. Fast clustering with lower bounds: No customer
too far, no shop too small. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7318, 2013.
[18] Matt Gibson, Gaurav Kanade, Erik Krohn, Imran A Pirwani, and Kasturi Varadarajan. On metric
clustering to minimize the sum of radii. Algorithmica, 57(3):484–498, 2010.
[19] Matt Gibson, Gaurav Kanade, Erik Krohn, Imran A Pirwani, and Kasturi Varadarajan. On clustering
to minimize the sum of radii. SIAM Journal on Computing, 41(1):47–60, 2012.
[20] Sudipto Guha, Adam Meyerson, and Kamesh Munagala. Hierarchical placement and network design
problems. In Proceedings of 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(FOCS), pages 603–612, 2000.
[21] Dorit S Hochbaum and David B Shmoys. A best possible heuristic for the k-center problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 10(2):180–184, 1985.
[22] Dorit S Hochbaum and David B Shmoys. A unified approach to approximation algorithms for bottleneck problems. Journal of the ACM, 33(3):533–550, 1986.
[23] Kamal Jain and Vijay V Vazirani. Approximation algorithms for metric facility location and k-median
problems using the primal-dual schema and lagrangian relaxation. Journal of the ACM, 48(2):274–296,
2001.
[24] David R. Karger and Maria Minkoff. Building steiner trees with incomplete global knowledge. In
Proceedings of 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages
613–623, 2000.
[25] Samir Khuller and Yoram J Sussmann. The capacitated k-center problem. SIAM Journal on Discrete
Mathematics, 13(3):403–418, 2000.
[26] Shi Li and Ola Svensson. Approximating k-median via pseudo-approximation. In Proceedings of the
44th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pages 901–910, 2013.
[27] Andrew Lim, Fan Wang, and Zhou Xu. A transportation problem with minimum quantity commitment.
Transportation Science, 40(1):117–129, 2006.
[28] Pitu B Mirchandani and Richard L Francis. Discrete location theory. Wiley-Interscience, 1990.
[29] Pierangela Samarati. Protecting respondents identities in microdata release. IEEE Transactions on
Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(6):1010–1027, 2001.
[30] David B Shmoys. The design and analysis of approximation algorithms. Trends in Optimization:
American Mathematical Society Short Course, January 5-6, 2004, Phoeniz, Arizona, 61:85, 2004.
[31] Zoya Svitkina. Lower-bounded facility location. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 6(4):69,
2010.
A
Improved Approximation Ratio for LBkSR
We now describe in detail the changes to algorithm k-BSAlg and its analysis leading to Theorem 2.7. First,
we set δz = OPT
3n2n in the binary-search procedure (step B1); note that the binary search still takes polynomial
time. By Lemma 2.11 (specialized to the non-outlier setting), we have kα1 − α2 k∞ ≤ 2n δz , which implies
21
that every (i, r) ∈ T1 ∪ T2 is almost tight with respect to (αp , zp ) for p = 1, 2. To obtain the improved
guarantee, we construct the mapping π : F1 7→ F2 , and hence, our stars, based on whether pairs (i0 , rad1 (i0 ))
and (i, rad2 (i)) intersect for i0 ∈ µ(F1 ), i ∈ µ(F2 ). To ensure that every (i0 , r0 ) ∈ F1 belongs to some star,
we first modify F2 and T2,I by including non-intersecting pairs from T1,I (which are almost tight in (α2 , z2 )).
We consider pairs in F1 in arbitrary order. For each (i, r) ∈ F1 , if (i, rad1 (i)) does not intersect any pair in
T2,I , we add (i, rad1 (i)) to T2,I , add (i, r) to F2 , and set rad2 (i) = rad1 (i). We continue this process until
all pairs in F1 are scanned or |F2 | = k 0 .
Lemma A.1. If |F2 | = k 0 after the above process, then F2 is a feasible k-BS solution with cost(F2 ) ≤
(3 + )OPT , and T2,I ⊆ L0 is a set of non-intersecting pairs.
Proof. All clients in D0 are covered by balls corresponding to the F2 -pairs since this holds even before any
0
pairs P
are added to F2 . It is clear
Using Lemma 2.11, we
P that T12,I ⊆nL and consists
P of non-intersecting pairs.
have (î,r̂)∈T2,I (r̂ + z1 ) ≤ j∈D0 αj + 2 δz |T2,I |, so (î,r̂)∈T2,I r̂ ≤ 1 + 3 OPT . For every (i, r) ∈ F2
P
we have r ≤ 3rad2 (i), so cost(F2 ) ≤ (î,r̂)∈T2,I 3r̂ ≤ (3 + )OPT .
So if |F2 | = k 0 after the above preprocessing, we simply return (F2 , rad2 ). Otherwise, we combine
solutions F1 and F2 using an LP similar to (C-P). We construct a map π : F1 → F2 similar to before, but
with the small modification that we set π(i0 , r0 ) = (i, r) only if (i0 , rad1 (i0 )) intersects with (i, rad2 (i)).
Due to our preprocessing, π is well-defined. As before, let star Si,r = π −1 (i, r) for each (i, r) ∈ F2 .
Figure 2: Old combination method.
Si,r = {(i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 ), (i3 , r3 )}
Figure 3: New combination method.
Si,r = {(i1 , r1 ), (i2 , r2 ), (i3 , r3 )}
The LP again has an indicator variable xi,r . If xi,r = 0,Pwe select all pairs in Si,r . Otherwise, if Si,r 6= ∅,
we select a pair (i0 , r0 ) ∈ Si,r and include i0 , 2rad2 (i) + (i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r 4rad1 (i00 ) in our solution; note that
S
the corresponding ball covers all clients in (i00 ,r00 )∈Si,r B(i00 , r00 ). So we consider the following LP.
min
X
xi,r 2rad2 (i) +
P
(i0 ,r0 )∈S
P
0
0
4rad
(i
)
+
(1
−
x
)
3rad
(i
)
0
0
1
i,r
1
(i ,r )∈Si,r
i,r
(i,r)∈F2
s.t.
X
xi,r + |Si,r |(1 − xi,r ) ≤ k,
(i,r)∈F2
22
0 ≤ xi,r ≤ 1
∀(i, r) ∈ F2 .
(C-P’)
Let x∗ be an extreme point of (C-P’). Let F 0 be the pairs obtained by picking the pairs corresponding to
dx∗ e as described above. Since x∗ has at most
one fractional component, it follows as before that |F 0 | ≤ k 0 .
0
As before, we return
F , {rad(i)}µ(i)∈F 0 or P
(F2 , {rad2 (i)}), whichever has lower cost.
P
0 =
0
Let C10 =
rad
(i)
and
C
1
2
(i,r)∈F1
(i0 ,r0 )∈F2 rad2 (i ). The following claims are analogous to
Claims 2.4 and 2.6.
Claim A.2. We have aC10 + bC20 ≤ 1 + 3 OPT .
Proof. Using Lemma 2.11, we have
aC10 + bC20 = a
X
(i,r)∈F1
rad1 (i) + b
X
rad2 (i) ≤ a ·
X
j∈D0
(i,r)∈F2
X
αj1 − k1 z1 + b · k2 2n δz +
αj1 − k2 z2
j∈D0
· OPT
3
j∈D0
X
=
αj1 − k 0 · z1 + · OPT ≤ 1 +
OPT .
3
3
0
≤
X
(aαj1 + bαj1 ) − (ak1 + bk2 ) · z1 +
j∈D
Claim A.3. min{3C20 , 2bC20 + (3 + b)C10 } ≤
such that a + b = 1.
3(b+3)
(aC10
3b2 −2b+3
+ bC20 ) ≤ 3.83(aC10 + bC20 ) for all a, b ≥ 0
Proof. Since the minimum is less than any convex combination,
min(3C20 , 2bC20 + bC10 + 3C10 ) ≤
=
=
3b2 + b
−3b + 3
(3C20 ) + 2
(2bC20 + bC10 + 3C10 )
3b2 − 2b + 3
3b − 2b + 3
3b(b + 3)
3(1 − b)(b + 3) 0
(C1 ) + 2
C0
3b2 − 2b + 3
3b − 2b + 3 2
3(b + 3)
((1 − b)C10 + bC20 ).
3b2 − 2b + 3
Since a = 1 − b, the first inequality in the claim follows. The expression 3b3(b+3)
2 −2b+3 is maximized at
√
√
3
b = −3 + 2 3, and has value 8 (5 + 3 3) ≈ 3.8235, which yields the second inequality in the claim.
Lemma A.4. The cost of the solution (F, {rad(i)}) returned by the above combination subroutine is at most
(3.83 + O())OP T + O(R∗ ) where {(i, rad(i))}i∈µ(F ) ⊆ L0 is a set of non-intersecting pairs.
Proof. First note that {rad(i)} correspond to {rad2 (i)} if F = F2 and {rad(i)} ⊆ {rad1 (i)} if F = F 0 , so
in both cases it consists of non-intersecting pairs from L0 .
The cost of the pair included in F 0 corresponding to a fractional component of x∗ is at most 7R∗ as
each radp (i) is bounded by R∗ for p ∈ {1, 2}. Since x∗ has at most one fractional component, cost(F 0 ) ≤
OPT C-P’ + 7R∗ . Also, OPT C-P’ ≤ 2bC20 + (4b + 3a)C10 = 2bC20 + (3 + b)C10 , since setting xi,r = b for all
(i, r) ∈ F2 yields a feasible solution to (C-P’) of this cost. Therefore, cost(F ) ≤ min{3C20 , 2bC20 + (b +
3)C10 + 7R∗ }, which is at most 3.83(aC10 + bC20 ) + 7R∗ by Claim A.3. Combining this with Claim A.2
yields the bound in the lemma.
Proof of Theorem 2.7. It suffices to show that when the selection F O = {(i1 , r1 ), . . . (it , rt )} in step A1
corresponds to the t facilities in an optimal solution with largest radii, we obtain the desired approximation
∗
bound. In this case, if t = k, then F O is an optimal solution; otherwise, we have R∗ ≤ Ot ≤ O∗ and
P
OPT ≤ O∗ − tp=1 rp . Combining Lemma A.4 and Lemma 2.1 then yields the theorem.
23
B
Proof of Lemma 2.11
We abbreviate PDAlgo (D0 , L0 , z) to PDAlgo (z). We use x− to denote a quantity infinitesimally smaller than
x. Consider the dual-ascent phase of PDAlgo for z1 and z2 . First, suppose that m = 0. Sort clients with
respect to their αj0 = min(αj1 , αj2 ) value. Let this ordering be α10 ≤ α20 ≤ · · · ≤ αn0 . We prove by induction
that |αj1 − αj2 | ≤ 2j−1 δz .
For the base case, assume without loss of generality that αj0 = αj1 , and let (i, r) be the tight pair that
0
caused j to become inactive in PDAlgo (z1 ). Consider time point t =
Pα1 in the two executions. By definition
−
o
all clients are active at time t in PDAlg (z2 ). So the contribution j∈B(i,r)∩D0 αj of clients to the LHS of
(3) at time t− is at least as much as their contribution in PDAlgo (z1 ) at time t− . Therefore, we can increase
α1 by at most δz beyond time t in PDAlgo (z2 ) as z2 − z1 = δz .
Suppose we have shown that for all clients j = 1, 2, · · · , ` − 1 (where ` ≥ 2), Now consider client `
and let (i, r) be the tight pair that makes ` inactive at time α`0 in PDAlgo (zp ), where p ∈ {1, 2}. Consider
time point t = α`0 in both executions. By definition, all clients j > ` are still active at time t− in both
o
executions PDAlgo (z1 ) and
PPDAlg (z2 ). (They might become inactive at time t but can not become inactive
earlier.) The contribution j∈B(i,r)∩D0 αj of clients to the LHS of (3) in the execution other than p at time
P
j−1 δ . The values of z in the
t− is at least their contribution in PDAlgo (zp ) at time t− minus `−1
z
j=1 2
two executions
differs
by
at
most
δ
,
so
in
the
execution
other
than
p,
α
can
grow beyond t by at most
z
`
P`−1 j−1
2 )δz ≤ 2` δz .
(1 + j=1
P
Now if we consider a tight pair (i, r) in one of the execution, the value of RHS and LHS of j∈B(i,r) αj ≤
P
r + z for the other execution can differ by at most (1 + nj=1 2j−1 )δz ≤ 2n δz .
Now consider the case where m > 0. Note that in this case, we can assume that we have the execution
for m = 0, pick the first time at which there are at most m active clients, i.e., time γ in PDAlgo , and set
αj = γ for every active client at this time point. Let γ 0 = min(γ 1 , γ 2 ), suppose γ 0 = γp , where p ∈ {1, 2}.
Note that by time γ 0 + 2n δz , all pairs that are tight in the p-th execution by time γ 0 are also tight in the other
execution. So the number of active clients after this time point is at most m. Therefore |γ 1 −γ 2 | ≤ 2n δz .
C
Equivalence of lower-bounded k-supplier with outliers and lower-bounded
k-center with outliers
Let LBkCentO denote the special case of LBkSupO where F = D. In this section, we show that if there
exists an α-approximation for LBkCentO, then there exists an α-approximation for LBkSupO. Let I =
(k, F, D, c, L, m) be an instance of LBkSupO with N = |F| + 1 and |D| = n. Define an instance I 0 =
(k 0 , D0 , c0 , L0 , m0 ) as follows: let k 0 = k and D0 = (D × {1, 2, · · · , N }) ∪ F. Let c0 ((j, p), i) = c(j, i)
for each j ∈ D, p ∈ [N ], i ∈ F, and let c0 be the metric completion of these distances (i.e., c0 (q, q 0 ) is the
shortest-path distance between q and q 0 with respect to these distances for q, q 0 ∈ D0 ). Define L0i = N Li for
i ∈ F and L0(j,p) = N (n + 1), and let m0 = N · m + (N − 1). Clearly I 0 can be constructed from I in
polynomial time. The lower-bounds for (j, p), j ∈ D, p ∈ [N ] are set so that L0(j,p) < |D0 |, so (j, p) cannot
be opened as a center in any feasible solution to I 0 .
Let OP T (I 0 ) denote the value of optimal solution of I 0 and OP T (I) denote the value of optimal
solution of I. We claim that OP T (I 0 ) ≤ OP T (I). Let (F ∗ , σ ∗ ) denote an optimal solution of I. Let
solution (F̂ , σ̂) for I be constructed as follows: let F̂ = F ∗ , for each p ∈ [N ], define σ(q) = i for
q = (j, p) if σ ∗ (j) = i, and σ(q) = out otherwise. Note that since there are at most m outliers in solution
(F ∗ , σ ∗ ) then there are at most N m + |F| = N m + (N − 1) outliers in (F̂ , σ̂). Clearly the radius of the
opened centers is the same as before, so OP T (I 0 ) ≤ OP T (I).
Now suppose there exists an α-approximation algorithm A for LBkCentO problem. Use A to generate
24
a solution (F̂ , σ̂) for I 0 with maximum radius R. As noted above, we have F̂ ⊆ F. We construct a solution
(F̂ , σ 0 ) for I of maximum radius at most R using Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 Constructing a feasible assignment σ 0
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
Construct network N = (V, E) where V = {s, t} ∪ D ∪ F̂ and E = {si : i ∈ F̂ } ∪ {ij : i ∈ F̂ , j ∈
D, c(i, j) ≤ r} ∪ {jt : j ∈ D}.
Set lij = 0, uij = ∞ for each ij ∈ E, i ∈ F̂ , j ∈ D.
Set lsi = Li , usi = ∞ for each si ∈ E, i ∈ F̂ .
Set ljt = 0, ujt = 1 for each jt ∈ E, j ∈ D.
Let f ← max-flow(N ) respecting lower-bounds (l) and upper-bounds (u) on edges.
if value of f is ≥ n − m then,
set σ 0 (j) = i if fjt = 1 and fij = 1 for i ∈ F̂ .
set σ 0 (j) = out if fjt = 0.
return f .
return σ 0 = ∅.
Lemma C.1. Solution (F̂ , σ 0 ) is a feasible solution to I with maximum radius at most R, where σ 0 is the
output of Algorithm 1.
P
Proof. Consider any set S ⊆ F̂ . There are at least Pi∈S N Li clients in D0 assigned to S. Since there are
P
i∈S N Li −(N −1)
at most N − 1 facilities among D0 , there
are
at
least
>
i∈S Li − 1 clients at distance at
N
P
most R from S. So there are
P at least i∈S Li clients in neighbor set of S in N . It follows that every s-t cut
in N has capacity at least i∈F̂ Li , so there exists a flow f that satisfies the lower-bounds and upper-bounds
on the edges.
It remains to show that value of f is at least |D| − m. If there is an incoming edge to a client in N ,
then a flow of 1 can be sent through j. So we want to bound the number of clients with no incoming edge
in N . If any copy of client j is served by some facility in the solution (F̂ , σ̂) then j is at distance at most
R from some facility in F̂ . Since there are at most N m + (N − 1) outliers in (F̂ , σ̂), there are at most
N m+(N −1)
< m + 1 clients with no incoming edge in N .
N
Since algorithm A is an α-approximation algorithm, wehave R ≤ α · OP T (I 0 ) ≤ αOP T (I).
25
| 8cs.DS
|
Quintic algebras over Dedekind domains and their resolvents
arXiv:1511.03162v1 [math.NT] 10 Nov 2015
Evan O’Dorney
November 11, 2015
This is an addendum to [4], which classified quadratic, cubic, and quartic rings over a
Dedekind domain.
1
A coordinate-free description of resolvents
Let Q be a quintic ring over a Dedekind domain R, and let L = Q/R. Our first task is to
generalize the notion of a sextic resolvent, developed by Bhargava in [2] in the case R = Z.
Following the approach of [6] and the present author’s senior thesis, we expect the resolvent
to consist of a rank-5 lattice M (to be thought of as S/R, where S is a sextic ring) with two
linear maps relating certain multilinear expressions in L and M . The orientation map θ—which
relates the top exterior powers of L and M —is easy to guess. The discriminant of an R-algebra T
naturally lies in (Λtop (T ))⊗−2 . Just as the equality Disc Q = Disc C between the discriminants of
a quartic ring and its cubic resolvent(s) suggests an identification of the top exterior powers of the
two rings, so the relation Disc S = (16 Disc Q)3 (Bhargava’s (33) of [2]) linking the discriminants
of a quintic ring and its sextic resolvent(s) suggests an isomorphism
θ : Λ5 M →(Λ4 L)⊗3 .
The second piece of data—that which contains the 40 integers that actually parametrize resolvents over Z—is slightly trickier to work out. Bhargava presents it as a map φ from L to
Λ2 M (equivalently, from Λ2 M ∗ to L∗ ), but this does not have the correct properties in our
situation. The correct construction, foreshadowed somewhat by the mysterious constant factor
in Bhargava’s fundamental resolvent ((28) in [2]), is to take a map
φ : Λ4 L ⊗ L → Λ2 M.
Finally, we must find the fundamental relations that link φ and θ to the ring structure. Just as
Lemma 9 of [1] provided the inspiration for Bhargava’s coordinate-free description of resolvents
of a quartic ring ([1], section 3.9), so we begin at Lemma 4(a), which, after eliminating the
references to S5 -closure, states that
1
φ(y) φ(x)
φ(y) φ(x)
Pfaff
− Pfaff
= 1 ∧ y ∧ x ∧ z ∧ yz.
φ(x) φ(z)
φ(x) −φ(z)
2
The Pfaffians are to be interpreted by writing φ(x), etc., as a 5 × 5 skew-symmetric matrix with
regard to any convenient basis (i.e. viewing it as a skew bilinear form on Λ2 M , once a generator
of Λ4 L is fixed. Then we paste together four of these to make a 10 × 10 skew-symmetric matrix
and take the Pfaffian. This is a clever way to manufacture certain degree-5 integer polynomials
in the 40 coefficients of φ. To re-express them in a way that is coordinate-free (and applicable
in characteristic 2), we consider two preliminary multilinear constructions.
1
1.1
The quadratic map µ 7→ µ
Let V be a 5-dimensional vector space over a field K (which we will soon take to be Frac R). We
examine the constructions that can be made starting with elements of Λ2 V . We have a bilinear
map ∧ : Λ2 V × Λ2 V → Λ4 V . However, the most fundamental map from Λ2 V to Λ4 V is not the
bilinear map ∧ but the quadratic map from which it arises. It is defined by
!
n
X
X
vi ∧ wi
=
vi ∧ wi ∧ vj ∧ wj .
(1)
i=1
1≤i<j≤n
It is not hard to prove that this is well defined. Note that if char K 6= 2, then µ can be described
more simply by
1
µ = µ ∧ µ.
2
Moreover, the bilinear map ∧ can always be recovered from • via
µ ∧ ν = (µ + ν) − µ − ν .
1.2
(2)
The contraction µ(α, β)
The second construction takes one element µ ∈ Λ2 V and two elements α, β ∈ Λ4 V and outputs
an element of a suitable one-dimensional vector space as follows. First, the perfect pairing
∧ : Λ4 V × V → Λ5 V
allows us to identify α and β as elements of Λ5 V ⊗ V ∗ . These have a wedge product
α ∧ β ∈ Λ2 (Λ5 V ⊗ V ∗ ) ∼
= (Λ5 V )⊗2 ⊗ Λ2 V ∗ .
We now use the duality between Λ2 V ∗ and Λ2 V , described explicitly by
(f ∧ g)(v ∧ w) = f v · gw − f w · gv,
to obtain an element
µ(α, β) ∈ (Λ5 V )⊗2 .
1.3
The definition
We are now ready to state the definition of a sextic resolvent.
Definition 1.1. Let Q be a quintic ring over a Dedekind domain R, and let L = Q/R. A
resolvent for Q consists of a rank-5 lattice M and a pair of linear maps
φ : Λ4 L ⊗ L → Λ2 M
and θ : Λ5 M →(Λ4 L)⊗3
satisfying the identity
θ⊗2 [φ(λ1 x)(φ(λ2 y) , φ(λ3 z) ] = λ1 λ22 λ23 (x ∧ y ∧ z ∧ yz)
(3)
where x, y, z ∈ L and λi ∈ Λ4 L are formal variables. The resolvent is called numerical if θ is an
isomorphism.
Note that the expression within square brackets lies in (Λ5 M )⊗2 ; applying θ⊗2 , one ends up
in (Λ4 L)⊗6 which is where the right-hand side also resides. It should also be remarked that the
product yz is carried out in Q; translating the lifts ỹ, z̃ by constants in R simply changes the
product ỹ z̃ by multiples of ỹ, z̃, and 1, thereby not changing the product y ∧ z ∧ yz.
2
2
Resolvent to ring
Our first task is to show that the resolvent maps φ and θ uniquely encode the multiplication
data of the ring Q.
Theorem 2.1. Let L and M be lattices over R of ranks 4 and 5 respectively, and let φ :
Λ4 L ⊗ L → Λ2 M and θ : Λ5 M →(Λ4 L)⊗3 be maps. There is a quintic ring Q with a quotient
map Q/R ∼
= L, unique up to isomorphism, such that (M, φ, θ) is a resolvent of Q.
Proof. Let (e1 , e2 , e3 , e4 ) be a basis for L, by which we mean that there is a decomposition
L = a1 e1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ a4 e4 for some fractional ideals ai of R. To place a ring structure on the module
−1
Q = L ⊕ R, it is then necessary to choose the coefficient ckij ∈ ak a−1
i aj of ek in the product ei ej .
We allow k = 0, with the conventions e0 = 1 and a0 = R. On the other hand, allowing i = 0
or j = 0 gives no useful information. Hence the ring structure is given by the 40 coefficients ckij ,
1 ≤ i ≤ j ≤ 4, 0 ≤ k ≤ 5.
Some of these coefficients are immediately determined by the resolvent. For instance, if
{i, j, k, ℓ} is a permutation of {1, 2, 3, 4}, and ǫ = ±1 its sign, then
−6
⊗2
ckij = −ǫe−1
[φ(eℓ etop )(φ (ei etop ), φ (ej etop )],
top · eℓ ∧ ei ∧ ej ∧ ei ej = −ǫetop · θ
(4)
where etop = e1 ∧ e2 ∧ e3 ∧ e4 = ǫ · ei ∧ ej ∧ ek ∧ eℓ is the natural generator of Λ4 L. This determines
the values of all ckij where i, j, and k are nonzero and distinct.
Likewise, the following expressions are determined, for i, j, k distinct:
j
cjii = ǫe−1
top · eℓ ∧ ei ∧ (ei + ek ) ∧ ei (ei + ek ) − cik
j
k
ckik − cjij = ǫe−1
top · eℓ ∧ ei ∧ (ej + ek ) ∧ ei (ej + ek ) − cik + cij
ciii − cjij − ckik = ǫe−1
top · eℓ ∧ (ei + ek ) ∧ (ei + ej ) ∧ (ei + ej )(ei + ek )
(5)
− cijk + cjik + ckij + cjii + ckii + (cjkj − ciki ) + (ckjk − ciji ).
The reader familiar with ring parametrizations will recognize the left-hand sides of (4) and (5)
as the linear expressions in the ckij that are invariant under translations ei 7→ ei + ti (ti ∈ a−1
i )
of the ring basis elements. If we normalize our basis so that, say, c112 = c212 = c334 = c434 = 0,
then all the ckij are now uniquely determined, except for the c0ij . The c0ij can be computed by
comparing the coefficients of k in (ei ej )ek and ei (ej ek ) for any k 6= i, yielding formula (22) of
[2]:
4
X
c0ij =
(crjk ckri − crij ckrk ).
r=1
The theorem is now reduced to three verifications.
−1
1. That all ckij belong to the correct ideals ak a−1
i aj . This is routine.
2. ThatP
the c0ij are well defined, and more generally that the associative law holds on the ring
Q = ai ei that we have just constructed. This is a family of integer polynomial identities
in the 40 free coefficients of φ in the chosen basis; as such, it was proved in the course of
Bhargava’s parametrization of quintic rings over Z.
3. That the original maps φ and θ indeed form a resolvent of Q, i.e. that the identity (3)
holds. This can probably also be proved by appeal to results over Z, but here a direct
proof is not difficult. We can assume that λ1 = λ2 = λ3 = etop and x is a basis element
eℓ , since the equation (3) is linear in those variables. We can also assume that each of y
and z is a basis element or a sum of two different basis elements, since (3) is quadratic in
those variables. Now we have a finite set of cases, some of which are the relations (4) and
(5), and the rest of which will be reduced to them using the following properties of the
underlying multilinear operations:
3
Lemma 2.2. Let V be a 5-dimensional vector space, and let µ, ν, ξ ∈ Λ2 V and α ∈ Λ4 V .
Then
(a) µ(µ ∧ ν, α) = ν(µ , α)
(b) µ(µ , α) = 0
(c) ν(µ , µ ∧ ξ) = −ξ(µ , µ ∧ ν).
Proof. Calculation, although only (a) need be checked directly, as (b) follows by setting
µ = ν and (c) by the derivation
ν(µ , µ ∧ ξ) = µ(µ ∧ ν, µ ∧ ξ) = −µ(µ ∧ ξ, µ ∧ ν) = −ξ(µ , µ ∧ ν).
Now we return to proving
θ⊗2 [φ(etop x)(φ(etop y) , φ(etop z) ] = e5top (eℓ ∧ y ∧ z ∧ yz)
(6)
for x = eℓ and y, z ∈ {ei }i ∪ {ei + ej }i<j . The cases where eℓ does not appear in y or z
are all subsumed by the definitions (4) and (5), with one exception: the expression for cjii
is not visibly symmetric under switching k and ℓ. This can be seen by writing
cjii = ǫe−1
top (eℓ ∧ ei ∧ (ei + ek ) ∧ ei (ei + ek ) − eℓ ∧ ei ∧ ek ∧ ei ek )
= ǫe−5
top φ(eℓ )(φ (ei ), φ (ei + ek )) − φ(eℓ )(φ (ei ), φ (ek ))
= ǫe−5
top φ(eℓ )(φ (ei ), φ (ei ) + φ(ei ) ∧ φ(ek ) + φ (ek )) − φ(eℓ )(φ (ei ), φ (ek ))
= ǫe−5
top φ(eℓ )(φ (ei ), φ(ei ) ∧ φ(ek ))
and using Lemma 2.2(c). It remains to dispose of the cases where eℓ does appear in y or z.
The key is to use Lemma 2.2(a) to reduce the case (x, x + y, z) of (6) to the cases (x, y, z)
and (y, x, z). The details are left to the reader.
Remark. Over Z, assuming that θ is an isomorphism, the resolvent devolves into the basis
representation of φ. This has 40 independent entries which can be arranged into a quadruple of
5 × 5 skew-symmetric matrices, representing the values φ(x) (as x runs through a basis) as skew
bilinear forms on M ∗ . The coefficients ckij of the ring we have constructed are certain degree-5
polynomials in these 40 entries which are easily identified with the formulas given in (21) of [2].
Thus our definition of resolvent is compatible with Bhargava’s (Definition 10), which justifies
our invocation of his computations in our situation, despite the dissimilarities of the definitions.
2.1
The sextic ring
It ought to be remarked that, given any resolvent (L, M, φ, θ), the rank-6 lattice M ⊕ R also
picks up a canonical ring structure, whose structure coefficients dkij are integer polynomials in
the coefficients of φ of degree 12 (for k 6= 0) and 24 (for k = 0). As the construction given by
Bhargava in [2], Section 6 works without change over a Dedekind domain, we will not discuss it
further.
3
3.1
Constructing resolvents
Resolvents over a field
Let K be a field. We will first investigate what sort of family of resolvents a quintic K-algebra
has. In the quartic case, it was the trivial ring T = K[x, y, z]/(x, y, z)2 that had a large family, all
4
other rings having a unique resolvent. Here, if a ring has multiple resolvents, it is not necessarily
trivial, but as we will see, it is in a sense minimally far from being trivial. The appropriate
definition is as follows:
Definition 3.1. A quintic algebra Q over K is very degenerate if it has subspaces Q4 ⊆ Q3 , of
dimension 4 and 3 respectively, such that Q4 Q3 = 0 (that is, the product of any element of Q4
and any element of Q3 is zero).
This implies that Q has a multiplication table
×
1
α
β
γ
δ
1
1
α
β
γ
δ
α
α
u
0
0
0
β
β
0
0
0
0
γ
γ
0
0
0
0
δ
δ
0
0
0
0
(7)
in which 15 of the 16 non-forced entries are zero. We prove:
Theorem 3.2. Every not very degenerate quintic K-algebra has a unique resolvent up to isomorphism.
Proof. The first few steps are easy: let M be a K-vector space of dimension 5, and let θ :
Λ5 M →(Λ4 L)⊗3 be any isomorphism. So far we have not made any choices. (The choice θ = 0
works only for the trivial ring.) We will first try to construct the map φ = φ(•) , a quadratic
map from Λ4 L ⊗ L to Λ4 M . For this purpose we concoct a corollary of (3) that involves only
φ .
Lemma 3.3. Let V be a 5-dimensional vector space. Let µ ∈ Λ2 M and α, β, γ, δ ∈ Λ4 M . Then
µ ∧ α ∧ β ∧ γ ∧ δ = µ(α, β)µ(γ, δ) + µ(α, γ)µ(δ, β) + µ(α, δ)µ(β, γ)
in Λ5 (Λ4 V ) ∼
= (Λ5 V )⊗4 .
Proof. Write the general µ as u ∧ v + w ∧ x (u, v, w, x ∈ V ) and expand.
As a corollary, we get that if (M, φ, θ) is a resolvent of a quintic ring Q, then for all a, b, c, d, e ∈
Λ4 L ⊗ L,
Motivated by this, we define for any quintic ring Q the pentaquadratic form
F (a, b, c, d, e) = (a ∧ b ∧ c ∧ bc)(a ∧ d ∧ e ∧ de)
+ (a ∧ b ∧ d ∧ bd)(a ∧ e ∧ c ∧ ec) + (a ∧ b ∧ e ∧ be)(a ∧ c ∧ d ∧ cd)
(8)
from L5 to (Λ4 L)⊗2 , or equivalently from (Λ4 L ⊗ L)5 to (Λ4 L)⊗12 . We get that for any resolvent
(M, φ, θ) of Q,
θ⊗4 (φ (a) ∧ φ (b) ∧ φ (c) ∧ φ (d) ∧ φ (e)) = F (a, b, c, d, e).
(9)
We claim the following:
Lemma 3.4. F is identically zero if and only if Q is very degenerate.
Proof. We prove that the property of being very degenerate is invariant under base-changing to
the algebraic closure K̄ of K; then the lemma can be proved by checking the finitely many quintic
algebras over an algebraically closed field (see [3, 5]). Let Q̄ = Q ⊗K K̄ be the corresponding
5
K̄-algebra. Clearly if Q is very degenerate, so is Q̄, so assume that Q̄ is very degenerate. Then
the subsets
M = {x ∈ Q′ | dim ker x ≥ 3} and N = {x ∈ Q′ |M x = 0}
are, by reference to the multiplication table (7), vector spaces with dim M = 4 and dim N ∈
{3, 4}. Moreover, because they are canonically defined, they are invariant under the Galois group
Gal(K̄/K). This shows that M ∩ Q and N ∩ Q are K-vector spaces of the same dimensions with
(M ∩ Q)(N ∩ Q) = 0, so Q is very degenerate.
Picking a1 , . . . , a5 ∈ Λ4 L ⊗ L such that F (a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 , a5 ) = f0 6= 0, we get that the five
vectors vi = φ (ai ) must form a basis such that
θ⊗4 (v1 ∧ v2 ∧ v3 ∧ v4 ∧ v5 ) = f0 .
Any such basis is as good as any other—they are all related by elements of SL(∧4 M ), which is
canonically isomorphic to SL(M ) (although GL(∧4 M ) ∼
6 GL(M ) in general). Once the vi are
=
fixed, there is at most one candidate for the map φ up to SL(M )-equivalence, namely
φ (a) =
5
X
F (a1 , . . . , âi , a, . . . , a5 )
F (a1 , a2 , a3 , a4 , a5 )
i=1
vi
(10)
Then the relations
φ(x)(φ (ai ), φ (aj )) = x ∧ ai ∧ aj ∧ ai aj ,
for 1 ≤ i < j ≤ 5, determine the map φ uniquely. So the resolvent map φ, if it exists, must
be given by a predetermined formula, or rather by any one of a finite number of such formulas,
inasmuch as the ai in (10) can be chosen from the finite set {e1 , e2 , e3 , e4 , e1 + e2 , e1 + e3 , . . . , e3 +
e4 } for any basis {e1 , e2 , e3 , e4 } of Λ4 L ⊗ L. It remains to prove that the (M, φ, θ) we have hereby
constructed is actually a resolvent; this is a collection of integer polynomial identities, not in a
family of free variables as in the previous lemma, but in the coefficients ckij of the given ring Q,
which are restricted by the associative law. If Q has nonzero discriminant—the most common
case—the theorem can be proved by base-changing to the algebraic closure K̄ and noting that
K̄ ⊕5 , the unique nondegenerate quintic K̄-algebra, does have a resolvent (Example 4.1). The
general case can be handled by a limiting argument, appealing to the known fact that all quintic
K̄-algebras can be deformed to K̄ ⊕5 , at least in characteristic zero (see [3]).
3.2
From field to Dedekind domain
Let Q be a quintic ring over a Dedekind domain R. We will assume that Q is not very degenerate
and hence that the corresponding K-algebra QK = Q ⊗R K has a unique resolvent (MK , φ, θ).
Resolvents of Q are now in bijection with lattices M in the vector space MK such that
φ(Λ4 L ⊗ L) ⊆ Λ2 M
(11)
⊗3
(12)
5
4
θ(Λ M ) ⊆ (Λ L)
.
For any resolvent M , note that we must have
M∗ ∼
= Λ4 M ⊗ (M 5 )⊗−1 ⊇ φ (Λ4 L ⊗ L) ⊗ (θ((Λ4 L)⊗3 ))⊗−1 .
Since Q is not very degenerate, the right-hand side is a lattice of full rank and we may take its
dual, which we denote by M0 . Then any resolvent is contained in M0 . Condition (11) is vacuous
for M = M0 , since
φ(λx)(φ (λ′ y), φ (λ′′ z)) = θ⊗2 (λλ′ λ′′ (x ∧ y ∧ z ∧ yz)) ∈ (θ(Λ3 L))⊗2
6
for all λ′ , λ′′ ∈ Λ3 L and y, z ∈ L. On the other hand, condition (12) is generally not satisfied by
M = M0 ; indeed, one readily finds that θ−1 ((Λ4 L)⊗3 ) ⊆ Λ5 M0 using (9), so if M0 is a resolvent,
it is numerical.
The classification of resolvents is now reduced to a local problem. Any M determines a family
of resolvents (Mp , φ, θ) of the quintic algebras Qp over the DVR’s Rp ⊆ K, and conversely
an arbitrary
choice of resolvents Mp of the Rp can be glued together to form the resolvent
T
M = p Mp . The choice Mp = M0,p = M0 ⊗ Rp is forced for all but finitely many primes p,
namely those dividing the ideal
c = [Λ5 M0 : θ−1 ((Λ4 L)⊗3 )] = [(Λ4 L)⊗2 : hF (a, b, c, d, e) : a, b, c, d, e ∈ Li].
(13)
In the lucky case that c is the unit ideal, M0 is the only resolvent. This occurs in one important
instance:
Theorem 3.5. If Q is a maximal quintic ring, that is, is not contained in any strictly larger
quintic ring, then Q has a unique resolvent, which is numerical.
Proof. Suppose that c were not the unit ideal, so there is a prime p such that p|F (a, b, c, d, e) for
all a, b, c, d, e ∈ L. We will prove that Q is not maximal at p. It is convenient to localize and to
assume that R = Rp is a DVR with uniformizer π.
Note that Q/pQ, a quintic algebra over R/p, has its associated pentaquadratic form F identically zero, so by Lemma 3.4, it is very degenerate. So Q has an R-basis (1, x, ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 ) such that
(x, ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 )(ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 ) ⊆ pR. We claim that the lattice Q′ with basis (1, x, π −1 ǫ1 , π −1 ǫ2 , π −1 ǫ3
either is a quintic ring or is contained in a quintic ring, showing that Q is not maximal.
Set M = hπ, x, ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 i and N = hπ, πx, ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 i. Then Q ⊇ M ⊇ N ⊇ πQ and M N ⊆ πQ.
Consider, for any i, j ∈ {1, 2, 3}, the multiplication maps
Q/N
ǫi
h1, xi
/ N/πQ
ǫj
hǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 i
ǫi
/ πQ/πN
hπ, πxi
/ πN /π 2 Q
hπǫ1 , πǫ2 , πǫ3 i .
These are all linear maps of R/p-vector spaces. Denote by f the composition of the left two
maps and by g the composition of the right two. Write f (1) = π(a + bx), where a, b ∈ R/p. Then
g(ǫi ) = aπǫi , since xǫi ∈ πQ. Thus g is given in the bases above by the scalar matrix a. But g
has rank at most 2, since it factors through the two-dimensional space πQ/πN ; hence a = 0. So
N 2 ⊆ πM .
Now consider the following multiplication maps:
Q/M
h1i
ǫi
/ N/πQ
hǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 i
ǫj
/ πM /πN
ǫk
/ π 2 Q/π 2 M
π2
hπxi
ǫi
/ π 2 N /π 3 Q
π 2 ǫ1 , π 2 ǫ2 , π 2 ǫ3 .
Similarly to the previous argument, the composition of the first three maps must be zero, or else
the composition of the last three would be a nonzero scalar. Since the images of the first map
(as i varies) span N/πQ, the composition of the middle two maps is always zero. There are two
cases:
(a) The second map is always zero, that is, N 2 ⊆ πN . This implies that π −1 N is a quintic
ring, as desired.
7
(b) The third map is always zero, that is, M N ⊆ πM . We get that π −1 ǫi is integral over
R (look at the characteristic polynomial of its action on M ), so R[π −1 ǫ1 , π −1 ǫ2 , π −1 ǫ3 ] is
finitely generated and thus a quintic ring, as desired.
Note that, in this proof, if the resolvent is not unique, then the extension Q′ ) Q has
(R/p)3 ⊆ Q′ /Q. So the following stronger theorem holds:
Theorem 3.6. If Q is a quintic ring such that the R/p-vector space of congruence classes in
π −1 Q/Q whose elements are integral over R has dimension at most 2, for each prime p, then Q
has a unique resolvent, which is numerical.
3.3
Bounds on the number of numerical resolvents
Finally, we examine bounds on the number of numerical resolvents a not very degenerate quintic
ring can have. A lower bound of 1 was proved over Z in [2], Theorem 12; the method is
adaptable to our situation, and we do not attempt to sharpen the bound. Instead, let us prove
a complementary upper bound in terms of the invariant c of (13).
Theorem 3.7. A not very degenerate ring Q has at most
Y N (p)5 − 1 n
N (p) − 1
p prime,
pn kc
numerical resolvents, provided that the absolute norms N (p) = |R/p| are finite. In particular,
a not very degenerate quintic ring over the ring of integers of a number field has finitely many
numerical resolvents.
Proof. Since all numerical resolvents have index c in M0 , it suffices to bound the number of
sublattices of index c in a fixed lattice M0 . By localization we may reduce to the case c = pn ,
where p is prime. Now a fixed lattice M has (N (p)5 − 1)/(N (p) − 1) sublattices of index p, the
kernels of the nonzero linear functionals ℓ : M/pM → R/p mod scaling. A sublattice Mn of index
pn has a filtration M0 ( M1 ( · · · ( Mn where the quotients are R/p; given Mi , there are at
most (N (p)5 − 1)/(N (p) − 1) possibilities for Mi+1 , giving the claimed bound.
4
Examples
Example 4.1. The most fundamental example of a sextic resolvent is as follows. Let Q = R⊕5 ,
with basis e1 , e2 , . . . , e5 , and let M = R5 with basis f1 , . . . , f5 . Then the map
φ(ei ) = fi ∧ (fi−1 + fi+1 )
(indices mod 5), supplemented by the natural orientation θ(ftop ) = e3top , is verified to be a
resolvent for Q (indeed the unique one, as Q is maximal). The automorphism group S5 of Q
acts on M by the 5-dimensional irreducible representation obtained (in characteristic not 2) by
restricting to the image of the exceptional embedding S5 ֒→ S6 the standard representation of
S6 , permuting the six vectors
fi−2 − fi−1 + fi − fi+1 + fi+2
(1 ≤ i ≤ 5) and f1 + f2 + f3 + f4 + f5 .
8
Example 4.2. For the subring
Q = {x1 e1 + · · · + x5 e5 ∈ Z⊕5 : x1 ≡ x2 ≡ x3 ≡ x4 mod p},
the bounding module M0 of Section 3.2 is no longer a resolvent, as can be seen by observing that
Q/pQ ∼
= Fp [t, ǫ1 , ǫ2 , ǫ3 ]/h{t2 − t, tǫi , ǫi ǫj }i is very degenerate. We have L = hpe1 , pe2 , pe3 , e5 i and
thus Λ4 L = hp3 etop i. One computes that
M0 = p(f1 + f4 ), p2 f2 , p2 f3 , p2 f4 , pf5 ,
and thus
c = [Λ5 M0 : θ−1 ((Λ4 L)⊗3 )] = [hp8 ftop i : hp9 ftop i] = p.
Consequently a numerical resolvent of Q is a submodule M of index p in M0 having the property
that φ(Λ4 L ⊗ L) ⊆ Λ2 M . Writing M as the kernel of some linear functional ℓ : M0 /pM0 → Fp ,
the condition is that ℓ lies in the kernel of each of the skew-symmetric bilinear forms obtained
by reducing φ(x) ∈ Λ2 M0 mod p for all x ∈ Λ4 L ⊗ L). Let
f1′ = p(f1 + f4 ), f2′ = p2 f2 , f3′ = p2 f3 , f4′ = p2 f4 , f5′ = pf5
be the basis elements of M0 listed above. We compute
φ(p4 etop e1 ) = (pf1′ − f4′ ) ∧ (pf5′ + f2′ )
φ(p4 etop e2 ) = f2′ ∧ (pf1′ − f4′ + f3′ )
φ(p4 etop e3 ) = f3′ ∧ (pf2′ + f4′ )
φ(p3 etop e5 ) = f5′ ∧ (pf1′ ).
So, letting f¯i′ denote the basis vector of M0 /pM0 corresponding to fi′ and f¯i′∗ the corresponding
vector of the dual basis, we have
ℓ ∈ ker(f¯2′ ∧ f¯4′ ) ∩ ker(f¯2′ ∧ f¯3′ ) ∩ ker(f¯3′ ∧ f¯4′ ) = f¯1′∗ , f¯5′∗ .
Since ℓ can take any value in the last-named vector space, up to scaling, we get p + 1 numerical
resolvents (and, as it turns out, no nonnumerical ones).
Example 4.3. The ring
Q = Z ⊕ Z ⊕ Z[x, y]/(x, y)2
is a curious example of Theorem 3.6. Although Q is infinitely far from being maximal (Z ⊕ Z ⊕
Z[n−1 x, n−1 y]/(n−2 (x, y)2 ) is a quintic extension ring for any n > 0), the extensions are only in
two directions, as it were, and the resolvent is accordingly unique.
Example 4.4. The simplest example of a non-numerical resolvent is given by the ring
Q = Z + p2 Z⊕5 = {x1 e1 + · · · + x5 e5 ∈ Z⊕5 : x1 ≡ · · · ≡ x5 mod p2 }.
We recognize L = p2 L1 , and we set M = p5 M1 , φ = φ1 |Λ4 L⊗L , and θ = θ1 |M , where the
subscript 1 denotes the corresponding entity in Example 4.1. Here
φ(Λ4 L ⊗ L) = φ(p8 Λ4 L1 ⊗ p2 L1 ) = p10 Λ2 M1 = Λ2 M,
while
θ(Λ5 M ) = θ(p25 Λ5 M1 ) = p25 (Λ4 L1 )⊗3 ( p24 (Λ4 L1 )⊗3 = (p8 Λ4 L1 )⊗3 = (Λ4 L)⊗3 .
The ring Q also has a large number of numerical resolvents, including for instance any supermodule of index p over M .
9
Example 4.5. Very degenerate rings. Over a field K, a very degenerate ring has a multiplication
table (7) with a single indeterminate entry u = α2 . By changing basis, we can reduce to the case
that u is either α, β, or 0, giving three very degenerate rings up to isomorphism; in Mazzola’s
nomenclature [3], they are
A18 = K ⊕ K[x, y, z]/(x, y, z)2 ,
A19 = K[x, y, z]/(x3 , xy, y 2 , xz, yz, z 2)
A20 = K[x, y, z, w]/(x, y, z, w)4 .
Each of these has a large family of resolvents. Utilizing Bhargava’s representation
quadruple of 5 × 5 skew-symmetric matrices, the maps
0 0 0 0 ∗
0 0 0 0 ∗
0 0 −1 0 ∗
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0 ∗ 0 0 1 0 ∗ 0 0 0 0 ∗ −1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 ∗ , 0 −1 0 0 ∗ , 1 0 0 0 ∗ , 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
∗ ∗ ∗ −1 0
∗ ∗ ∗ 0 0
∗ ∗ ∗ 0 0
∗ ∗ ∗ 0
(where ∗ represents any
0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0
0 −1 0 0
0 0 0 0
∗ ∗ ∗ −1
element)
∗
0
0
∗
∗
, 0
1 0
0
∗
are resolvents for A18 ,
0 0 0 ∗
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 ∗
0 0 0 ∗
, 1 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
∗ ∗ 0 0
∗ ∗
while
−1
0
0
0
∗
0
0
0
0
0
∗
0
−1
∗
∗
, 0
0 0
0
∗
1
0
0
0
∗
0
0
0
0
∗
0
0
0
0
0
of φ as a
∗
∗
∗
0
0
∗
∗
∗
0
0
works for A19 . The trivial ring A20 has an even larger family of resolvents, namely those where
φ lands in Λ2 N , for any hyperplane N ⊆ M , or in V ∧ M for any 2-plane V , or where θ = 0.
Are these all the resolvents? The classification of resolvents of very degenerate rings, even over
fields, is an inviting problem which does not readily yield to the φ -based method of Theorem
3.2.
References
[1] Manjul Bhargava. Higher composition laws. III. The parametrization of quartic rings. Ann.
of Math. (2), 159(3):1329–1360, 2004.
[2] Manjul Bhargava. Higher composition laws. IV. The parametrization of quintic rings. Ann.
of Math. (2), 167(1):53–94, 2008.
[3] Guerino Mazzola. Generic finite schemes and Hochschild cocycles. Comment. Math. Helv.,
55(2):267–293, 1980.
[4] Evan
O’Dorney.
Rings
of
small
rank over
a
Dedekind
domain.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.02777 (accessed 11/10/2015). Awaiting publication.
[5] Bjorn Poonen. The moduli space of commutative algebras of finite rank. J. Eur. Math. Soc.
(JEMS), 10(3):817–836, 2008.
[6] Melanie Matchett Wood. Parametrizing quartic algebras over an arbitrary base. Algebra
Number Theory, 5(8):1069–1094, 2011.
10
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1710.07177v1 [cs.CL] 19 Oct 2017
Findings of the Second Shared Task on Multimodal Machine Translation
and Multilingual Image Description
Desmond Elliott
School of Informatics
University of Edinburgh
[email protected]
Stella Frank
Centre for Language Evolution
University of Edinburgh
[email protected]
Loı̈c Barrault and Fethi Bougares
LIUM
University of Le Mans
[email protected]
Lucia Specia
Department of Computer Science
University of Sheffield
[email protected]
Abstract
We present the results from the second
shared task on multimodal machine translation and multilingual image description.
Nine teams submitted 19 systems to two
tasks. The multimodal translation task, in
which the source sentence is supplemented
by an image, was extended with a new language (French) and two new test sets. The
multilingual image description task was
changed such that at test time, only the
image is given. Compared to last year, multimodal systems improved, but text-only
systems remain competitive.
1
Introduction
The Shared Task on Multimodal Translation and
Multilingual Image Description tackles the problem of generating descriptions of images for languages other than English. The vast majority of
image description research has focused on Englishlanguage description due to the abundance of
crowdsourced resources (Bernardi et al., 2016).
However, there has been a significant amount of
recent work on creating multilingual image description datasets in German (Elliott et al., 2016;
Hitschler et al., 2016; Rajendran et al., 2016), Turkish (Unal et al., 2016), Chinese (Li et al., 2016),
Japanese (Miyazaki and Shimizu, 2016; Yoshikawa
et al., 2017), and Dutch (van Miltenburg et al.,
2017). Progress on this problem will be useful
for native-language image search, multilingual ecommerce, and audio-described video for visually
impaired viewers.
The first empirical results for multimodal translation showed the potential for visual context to
improve translation quality (Elliott et al., 2015;
Hitschler et al., 2016). This was quickly followed
by a wider range of work in the first shared task at
WMT 2016 (Specia et al., 2016).
The current shared task consists of two subtasks:
• Task 1: Multimodal translation takes an image with a source language description that is
then translated into a target language. The
training data consists of parallel sentences
with images.
• Task 2: Multilingual image description
takes an image and generates a description in
the target language without additional source
language information at test time. The training data, however, consists of images with
independent descriptions in both source and
target languages.
The translation task has been extended to include
a new language, French. This extension means the
Multi30K dataset (Elliott et al., 2016) is now triple
aligned, with English descriptions translated into
both German and French.
The description generation task has substantially
changed since last year. The main difference is
that source language descriptions are no longer
observed for test images. This mirrors the realworld scenario in which a target-language speaker
wants a description of image that does not already
have source language descriptions associated with
it. The two subtasks are now more distinct because
multilingual image description requires the use of
the image (no text-only system is possible because
the input contains no text).
Another change for this year is the introduction
of two new evaluation datasets: an extension of the
existing Multi30K dataset, and a “teaser” evaluation dataset with images carefully chosen to contain
ambiguities in the source language.
This year we encouraged participants to submit
systems using unconstrained data for both tasks.
Training on additional out-of-domain data is underexplored for these tasks. We believe this setting
will be critical for future real-world improvements,
given that the current training datasets are small
and expensive to construct.1
2
2.1
Tasks & Datasets
Tasks
The Multimodal Translation task (Task 1) follows
the format of the 2016 Shared Task (Specia et al.,
2016). The Multilingual Image Description Task
(Task 2) is new this year but it is related to the
Crosslingual Image Description task from 2016.
The main difference between the Crosslingual Image Description task and the Multilingual Image
Description task is the presence of source language
descriptions. In last year’s Crosslingual Image Description task, the aim was to produce a single
target language description, given five source language descriptions and the image. In this year’s
Multilingual Image Description task, participants
received only an unseen image at test time, without
source language descriptions.
2.2
En: A group of people are eating noddles.
De: Eine Gruppe von Leuten isst Nudeln.
Fr: Un groupe de gens mangent des nouilles.
Datasets
The Multi30K dataset (Elliott et al., 2016) is the
primary dataset for the shared task. It contains
31K images originally described in English (Young
et al., 2014) with two types of multilingual data:
a collection of professionally translated German
sentences, and a collection of independently crowdsourced German descriptions.
This year the Multi30K dataset has been extended with new evaluation data for the Translation
and Image Description tasks, and an additional language for the Translation task. In addition, we
released a new evaluation dataset featuring ambiguities that we expected would benefit from visual
context. Table 1 presents an overview of the new
evaluation datasets. Figure 1 shows an example of
an image with an aligned English-German-French
description.
In addition to releasing the parallel text, we also
distributed two types of ResNet-50 visual features
1
All of the data and results are available at http://www.
statmt.org/wmt17/multimodal-task.html
Figure 1: Example of an image with a source description in English, together with German and
French translations.
(He et al., 2016) for all of the images, namely the
‘res4 relu’ convolutional features (which preserve
the spatial location of a feature in the original image) and averaged pooled features.
Multi30K French Translations
We extended the translation data in Multi30K
dataset with crowdsourced French translations. The
crowdsourced translations were collected from 12
workers using an internal platform. We estimate the
translation work had a monetary value of e9,700.
The translators had access to the source segment,
the image and an automatic translation created with
a standard phrase-based system (Koehn et al., 2007)
trained on WMT’15 parallel text. The automatic
translations were presented to the crowdworkers to
further simplify the crowdsourcing task. We note
that this did not end up being a post-editing task,
that is, the translators did not simply copy and paste
the suggested translations. To demonstrate this, we
calculated text-similarity metric scores between the
phrase-based system outputs and the human translations on the training corpus, resulting in 0.41 edit
distance (measured using the TER metric), meaning that more than 40% of the words between these
two versions do not match.
Multi30K 2017 test data
We collected new evaluation data for the Multi30K
dataset. We sampled new images from five of
the six Flickr groups used to create the original
Flickr30K dataset using MMFeat (Kiela, 2016)2 .
2
Strangers!, Wild Child, Dogs in Action, Action Photography, and Outdoor Activities.
Training set
Development set
Images
Sentences
Images
Sentences
Translation
29,000
29,000
1,014
1,014
Description
29,000
145,000
1,014
5,070
2017 test
COCO
Images
Sentences
Images
Sentences
Translation
1,000
1,000
461
461
Description
1,071
5,355
—
Table 1: Overview of the Multi30K training, development, 2017 test, and Ambiguous COCO datasets.
Task 1
Task 2
Strangers!
150
154
Wild Child
83
83
remaining 1,071 images were used for the Multilingual Image Description task. We collected five additional independent German descriptions of those
images from Crowdflower.
Dogs in Action
78
92
Ambiguous COCO
Action Photography
238
259
Flickr Social Club
241
263
Everything Outdoor
206
214
Outdoor Activities
4
6
As a secondary evaluation dataset for the Multimodal Translation task, we collected and translated
a set of image descriptions that potentially contain ambiguous verbs. We based our selection on
the VerSe dataset (Gella et al., 2016), which annotates a subset of the COCO (Lin et al., 2014) and
TUHOI (Le et al., 2014) images with OntoNotes
senses for 90 verbs which are ambiguous, e.g. play.
Their goals were to test the feasibility of annotating images with the word sense of a given verb
(rather than verbs themselves) and to provide a
gold-labelled dataset for evaluating automatic visual sense disambiguation methods.
Altogether, the VerSe dataset contains 3,518 images, but we limited ourselves to its COCO section,
since for our purposes we also need the image descriptions, which are not available in TUHOI. The
COCO portion covers 82 verbs; we further discarded verbs that are unambiguous in the dataset,
i.e. although some verbs have multiple senses in
OntoNotes, they all occur with one sense in VerSe
(e.g. gather is used in all instances to describe the
‘people gathering’ sense), resulting in 57 ambiguous verbs (2,699 images). The actual descriptions
of the images were not distributed with the VerSe
dataset. However, given that the ambiguous verbs
were selected based on the image descriptions, we
assumed that in all cases at least one of the original COCO description (out of the five per image)
should contain the ambiguous verb. In cases where
more than one description contained the verb, we
Group
Table 2: Distribution of images in the Multi30K
2017 test data by Flickr group.
We sampled additional images from two thematically related groups (Everything Outdoor and
Flickr Social Club) because Outdoor Activities
only returned 10 new CC-licensed images and
Flickr-Social no longer exists. Table 2 shows the
distribution of images across the groups and tasks.
We initially downloaded 2,000 images per Flickr
group, which were then manually filtered by three
of the authors. The filtering was done to remove
(near) duplicate images, clearly watermarked images, and images with dubious content. This process resulted in a total of 2,071 images.
We crowdsourced five English descriptions of
each image from Crowdflower3 using the same process as Elliott et al. (2016). One of the authors selected 1,000 images from the collection to form the
dataset for the Multimodal Translation task based
on a manual inspection of the English descriptions.
Professional German translations were collected
for those 1,000 English-described images. The
3
http://www.crowdflower.com
En: A man on a motorcycle is passing another
vehicle.
De: Ein Mann auf einem Motorrad fährt an einem
anderen Fahrzeug vorbei.
Fr: Un homme sur une moto dépasse un autre
véhicule.
En: A red train is passing over the water on a
bridge
De: Ein roter Zug fährt auf einer Brücke über
das Wasser
Fr: Un train rouge traverse l’eau sur un pont.
Figure 2: Two senses of the English verb ”to pass” in their visual contexts, with the original English and
the translations into German and French. The verb and its translations are underlined.
randomly selected one such description to be part
of the dataset of descriptions containing ambiguous
verbs. This resulted in 2,699 descriptions.
As a consequence of the original goals of the
VerSe dataset, each sense of each ambiguous verb
was used multiple times in the dataset, which resulted in many descriptions with the same sense,
for example, 85 images (and descriptions) were
available for the verb show, but they referred to a
small set of senses of the verb.
The number of images (and therefore descriptions) per ambiguous verb varied from 6 (stir) to
100 (pull, serve). Since our intention was to have a
small but varied dataset, we selected a subset of a
subset of descriptions per ambiguous verb, aiming
at keeping 1-3 instances per sense per verb. This
resulted in 461 descriptions for 56 verbs in total,
ranging from 3 (e.g. shake, carry) to 26 (reach)
(the verb lay/lie was excluded as it had only one
sense). We note that the descriptions include the
use of the verbs in phrasal verbs. Two examples
of the English verb “to pass” are shown in Figure
2. In the German translations, the source language
verb did not require disambiguation (both German
translations use the verb “fährt”), whereas in the
French translations, the verb was disambiguated
into “dépasse” and “traverse”, respectively.
3
Participants
This year we attracted submissions from nine different groups. Table 3 presents an overview of the
groups and their submission identifiers.
AFRL-OHIOSTATE (Task 1) The AFRLOHIOSTATE system submission is an atypical Machine Translation (MT) system in that the image
is the catalyst for the MT results, and not the textual content. This system architecture assumes an
image caption engine can be trained in a target
language to give meaningful output in the form of
a set of the most probable n target language candidate captions. A learned mapping function of
the encoded source language caption to the corresponding encoded target language captions is then
employed. Finally, a distance function is applied
to retrieve the “nearest” candidate caption to be the
translation of the source caption.
CMU (Task 2) The CMU submission uses a
multi-task learning technique, extending the baseline so that it generates both a German caption
and an English caption. First, a German caption
is generated using the baseline method. After the
LSTM for the baseline model finishes producing
a German caption, it has some final hidden state.
Decoding is simply resumed starting from that final
state with an independent decoder, separate vocabulary, and this time without any direct access to
the image. The goal is to encourage the model to
keep information about the image in the hidden
state throughout the decoding process, hopefully
improving the model output. Although the model
is trained to produce both German and English cap-
ID
AFRL-OHIOSTATE
Participating team
Air Force Research Laboratory & Ohio State University (Duselis et al., 2017)
CMU
Carnegie Melon University (Jaffe, 2017)
CUNI
Univerzita Karlova v Praze (Helcl and Libovický, 2017)
DCU-ADAPT
Dublin City University (Calixto et al., 2017a)
LIUMCVC
Laboratoire d’Informatique de l’Université du Maine & Universitat Autonoma
de Barcelona Computer Vision Center (Caglayan et al., 2017)
NICT
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology & Nara
Institute of Science and Technology (Zhang et al., 2017)
OREGONSTATE
SHEF
UvA-TiCC
Oregon State University (Ma et al., 2017)
University of Sheffield (Madhyastha et al., 2017)
Universiteit van Amsterdam & Tilburg University (Elliott and Kádár, 2017)
Table 3: Participants in the WMT17 multimodal machine translation shared task.
tions, at evaluation time the English component of
the model is ignored and only German captions are
generated.
den state. Each image has one corresponding feature vector, obtained from the activations of the
FC7 layer of the VGG19 network, and consist of a
4096D real-valued vector that encode information
about the entire image.
CUNI (Tasks 1 and 2) For Task 1, the submissions employ the standard neural MT (NMT)
scheme enriched with another attentive encoder for
the input image. It uses a hierarchical attention
combination in the decoder (Libovický and Helcl,
2017). The best system was trained with additional
data obtained from selecting similar sentences from
parallel corpora and by back-translation of similar
sentences found in the SDEWAC corpus (Faaß and
Eckart, 2013).
The submission to Task 2 is a combination of
two neural models. The first model generates an
English caption from the image. The second model
is a text-only NMT model that translates the English caption to German.
LIUMCVC (Task 1) LIUMCVC experiment
with two approaches: a multimodal attentive NMT
with separate attention (Caglayan et al., 2016)
over source text and convolutional image features,
and an NMT where global visual features (2048dimensional pool5 features from ResNet-50) are
multiplicatively interacted with word embeddings.
More specifically, each target word embedding is
multiplied with global visual features in an elementwise fashion in order to visually contextualize word
representations. With 128-dimensional embeddings and 256-dimensional recurrent layers, the
resulting models have around 5M parameters.
DCU-ADAPT (Task 1) This submission evaluates ensembles of up to four different multimodal
NMT models. All models use global image features obtained with the pre-trained CNN VGG19,
and are either incorporated in the encoder or the
decoder. These models are described in detail in
(Calixto et al., 2017b). They are model IMGW ,
in which image features are used as words in the
source-language encoder; model IMGE , where image features are used to initialise the hidden states
of the forward and backward encoder RNNs; and
model IMGD , where the image features are used
as additional signals to initialise the decoder hid-
NICT (Task 1) These are constrained submissions for both language pairs. First, a hierarchical phrase-based (HPB) translation system s built
using Moses (Koehn et al., 2007) with standard
features. Then, an attentional encoder-decoder network (Bahdanau et al., 2015) is trained and used
as an additional feature to rerank the n-best output
of the HPB system. A unimodal NMT model is
also trained to integrate visual information. Instead
of integrating visual features into the NMT model
directly, image retrieval methods are employed to
obtain target language descriptions of images that
are similar to the image described by the source
sentence, and this target description information
is integrated into the NMT model. A multimodal
NMT model is also used to rerank the HPB output.
All feature weights (including the standard features,
the NMT feature and the multimodal NMT feature)
were tuned by MERT (Och, 2003). On the development set, the NMT feature improved the HPB system significantly. However, the multimodal NMT
feature did not further improve the HPB system
that had integrated the NMT feature.
OREGONSTATE (Task 1) The OREGONSTATE system uses a very simple but effective
model which feeds the image information to both
encoder and decoder. On the encoder side, the
image representation was used as an initialization
information to generate the source words’ representations. This step strengthens the relatedness
between image’s and source words’ representations.
Additionally, the decoder uses alignment to source
words by a global attention mechanism. In this way,
the decoder benefits from both image and source
language information and generates more accurate
target side sentence.
UvA-TiCC (Task 1) The submitted systems are
Imagination models (Elliott and Kádár, 2017),
which are trained to perform two tasks in a multitask learning framework: a) produce the target
sentence, and b) predict the visual feature vector of
the corresponding image. The constrained models
are trained over only the 29,000 training examples
in the Multi30K dataset with a source-side vocabulary of 10,214 types and a target-side vocabulary
of 16,022 types. The unconstrained models are
trained over a concatenation of the Multi30K, News
Commentary (Tiedemann, 2012) parallel texts, and
MS COCO (Chen et al., 2015) dataset with a joint
source-target vocabulary of 17,597 word pieces
(Schuster and Nakajima, 2012). In both constrained
and unconstrained submissions, the models were
trained to predict the 2048D GoogleLeNetV3 feature vector (Szegedy et al., 2015) of an image associated with a source language sentence. The
output of an ensemble of the three best randomly
initialized models - as measured by BLEU on the
Multi30K development set - was used for both the
constrained and unconstrained submissions.
SHEF (Task 1) The SHEF systems utilize the
predicted posterior probability distribution over the
image object classes as image features. To do so,
they make use of the pre-trained ResNet-152 (He
et al., 2016), a deep CNN based image network that
is trained over the 1,000 object categories on the
Imagenet dataset (Deng et al., 2009) to obtain the
posterior distribution. The model follows a standard encoder-decoder NMT approach using softdot
attention as described in (Luong et al., 2015). It
explores image information in three ways: a) to
initialize the encoder; b) to initialize the decoder;
c) to condition each source word with the image
class posteriors. In all these three ways, non-linear
affine transformations over the posteriors are used
as image features.
Baseline — Task 1 The baseline system for the
multimodal translation task is a text-only neural
machine translation system built with the Nematus toolkit (Sennrich et al., 2017). Most settings
and hyperparameters were kept as default, with a
few exceptions: batch size of 40 (instead of 80
due to memory constraints) and ADAM as optimizer. In order to handle rare and OOV words, we
used the Byte Pair Encoding Compression Algorithm to segment words (Sennrich et al., 2016b).
The merge operations for word segmentation were
learned using training data in both source and target
languages. These were then applied to all training,
validation and test sets in both source and target
languages. In post-processing, the original words
were restored by concatenating the subwords.
Baseline — Task 2 The baseline for the multilingual image description task is an attention-based
image description system trained over only the German image descriptions (Caglayan et al., 2017).
The visual representation are extracted from the
so-called res4f relu layer from a ResNet-50 (He
et al., 2016) convolutional neural network trained
on the ImageNet dataset (Russakovsky et al., 2015).
Those feature maps provide spatial information
on which the model focuses through the attention
mechanism.
4
Text-similarity Metric Results
The submissions were evaluated against either professional or crowd-sourced references. All submissions and references were pre-processed to lowercase, normalise punctuation, and tokenise the
sentences using the Moses scripts.4 The evaluation was performed using MultEval (Clark
et al., 2011) with the primary metric of Meteor
4
https://github.com/moses-smt/
mosesdecoder/blob/master/scripts/
1.5 (Denkowski and Lavie, 2014). We also report
the results using BLEU (Papineni et al., 2002) and
TER (Snover et al., 2006) metrics. The winning
submissions are indicated by •. These are the topscoring submissions and those that are not significantly different (based on Meteor scores) according
the approximate randomisation test (with p-value
≤ 0.05) provided by MultEval. Submissions
marked with * are not significantly different from
the Baseline according to the same test.
4.1
Task 1: English → German
4.1.1 Multi30K 2017 test data
Table 4 shows the results on the Multi30K
2017 test data with a German target language.
It interesting to note that the metrics do not
fully agree on the ranking of systems, although
the four best (statistically indistinguishable) systems win by all metrics.
All-but-one submission outperformed the text-only NMT baseline. This year, the best performing systems
include both multimodal (LIUMCVC MNMT C
and UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U) and text-only
(NICT NMTrerank C and LIUMCVC MNMT C)
submissions.
(Strictly speaking, the UvATiCC IMAGINATION U system is incomparable
because it is an unconstrained system, but all unconstrained systems perform in the same range as
the constrained systems.)
4.1.2 Ambiguous COCO
Table 5 shows the results for the out-of-domain
ambiguous COCO dataset with a German target
language. Once again the evaluation metrics do not
fully agree on the ranking of the submissions.
It is interesting to note that the metric scores are
lower for the out-of-domain Ambiguous COCO
data compared to the in-domain Multi30K 2017 test
data. However, we cannot make definitive claims
about the difficulty of the dataset because the Ambiguous COCO dataset contains fewer sentences
than the Multi30K 2017 test data (461 compared
to 1,000).
The systems are mostly in the same order as
on the Multi30K 2017 test data, with the same
four systems performing best. However, two systems (DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C and OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C) are ranked higher
on this test set than on the in-domain Flickr dataset,
indicating that they are relatively more robust and
possibly better at resolving the ambiguities found
in the Ambiguous COCO dataset.
4.2
4.2.1
Task 1: English → French
Multi30K Test 2017
Table 6 shows the results for the Multi30K 2017
test data with French as target language. A reduced
number of submissions were received for this new
language pair, with no unconstrained systems. In
contrast to the English→German results, the evaluation metrics are in better agreement about the
ranking of the submissions.
Translating from English→French is an easier
task than English→German systems, as reflected
in the higher metric scores. This also includes
the baseline systems where English→French results in 63.1 Meteor compared to 41.9 for
English→German.
Eight out of the ten submissions outperformed
the English→French baseline system. Two of the
best submissions for English→German remain the
best for English→French (LIUMCVC MNMT C
and NICT NMTrerank C), the text-only system
(LIUMCVC NMT C) decreased in performance,
and no UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U system was
submitted for French.
An interesting observation is the difference
of the Meteor scores between text-only NMT
system (LIUMCVC NMT C) and Moses hierarchical phrase-based system with reranking
(NICT NMTrerank C). While the two systems are
very close for the English→German direction, the
hierarchical system is better than the text-only
NMT systems in the English→French direction.
This pattern holds for both the Multi30K 2017 test
data and Ambiguous COCO test data.
4.2.2
Ambiguous COCO
Table 7 shows the results for the out-of-domain
Ambiguous COCO dataset with the French target language. Once again, in contrast to the
English→German results, the evaluation metrics are in better agreement about the ranking
of the submissions. The performance of all
the models is once again in mostly agreement
with the Multi30K 2017 test data, albeit lower.
Both DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C and OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C again perform relatively better on this dataset.
4.3
Task 2: English → German
The description generation task, in which systems
must generate target-language (German) captions
for a test image, has substantially changed since
•LIUMCVC MNMT C
•NICT NMTrerank C
•LIUMCVC NMT C
•UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT U
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT U
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
Baseline (text-only NMT)
AFRL-OHIOSTATE-MULTIMODAL U
BLEU ↑
Meteor ↑
TER ↓
33.4
31.9
33.2
33.3
30.2
31.1
31.0
29.8
29.5
28.5
29.7
25.8
25.0
24.2
19.3
6.5
54.0
53.9
53.8
53.5
51.2
51.0
50.6
50.5
50.2
49.2
48.9
47.1
44.5
43.4
41.9
20.2
48.5
48.1
48.2
47.5
50.8
50.7
50.7
52.3
52.5
54.3
51.6
56.3
53.8
55.9
72.2
87.4
Table 4: Official results for the WMT17 Multimodal Machine Translation task on the English-German
Multi30K 2017 test data. Systems with grey background indicate use of resources that fall outside the
constraints provided for the shared task.
•LIUMCVC NMT C
•LIUMCVC MNMT C
•NICT 1 NMTrerank C
•UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT U
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT U
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
Baseline (text-only NMT)
BLEU ↑
Meteor ↑
TER ↓
28.7
28.5
28.1
28.0
26.4
27.4
26.6
26.4
26.1
25.7
23.2
22.4
21.4
21.0
18.7
48.9
48.8
48.5
48.1
46.8
46.5
46.0
45.8
45.7
45.6
43.8
42.7
40.7
40.0
37.6
52.5
53.4
52.9
52.4
54.5
52.3
54.8
55.4
55.9
55.7
59.8
60.1
56.5
57.8
66.1
Table 5: Results for the Multimodal Translation task on the English-German Ambiguous COCO dataset.
Systems with grey background indicate use of resources that fall outside the constraints provided for the
shared task.
•LIUMCVC MNMT C
•NICT NMTrerank C
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
LIUMCVC NMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
Baseline (text-only NMT)
*SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
BLEU ↑
Meteor ↑
TER ↓
55.9
55.3
54.1
53.3
51.9
51.0
49.9
50.3
44.3
45.0
43.6
72.1
72.0
70.1
70.1
68.3
67.2
67.2
67.0
63.1
62.8
61.5
28.4
28.4
30.0
31.7
32.7
33.6
34.3
33.6
39.6
38.4
40.5
Table 6: Results for the Multimodal Translation task on the English-French Multi30K Test 2017 data.
•LIUMCVC MNMT C
•NICT NMTrerank C
•DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
LIUMCVC NMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTexutalMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
*SHEF ShefClassProj C
Baseline (text-only NMT)
BLEU ↑
Meteor ↑
TER ↓
45.9
45.1
44.5
44.1
43.6
43.0
42.9
41.2
37.2
36.8
35.1
65.9
65.6
64.1
63.8
63.4
62.5
62.5
61.6
57.3
57.0
55.8
34.2
34.7
35.2
36.7
37.4
38.2
38.2
37.8
42.4
44.5
45.8
Table 7: Results for the Multimodal Translation task on the English-French Ambiguous COCO dataset.
Baseline (target monolingual)
CUNI NeuralMonkeyCaptionAndMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyCaptionAndMT U
CMU NeuralEncoderDecoder C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyBilingual C
BLEU ↑
Meteor ↑
TER ↓
9.1
4.2
6.5
9.1
2.3
23.4
22.1
20.6
19.8
17.6
91.4
133.6
91.7
63.3
112.6
Table 8: Results for the Multilingual Image Description task on the English-German Multi30K 2017 test
data.
last year. The main difference is that source language descriptions are no longer observed for images at test time. The training data remains the
same and contains images with both source and
target language descriptions. The aim is thus to
leverage multilingual training data to improve a
monolingual task.
Table 8 shows the results for the Multilingual
image description task. This task attracted fewer
submissions than last year, which may be because it
was no longer possible to re-use a model designed
for Multimodal Translation. The evaluation metrics
do not agree on the ranking of the submissions,
with major differences in the ranking using either
BLEU or TER instead of Meteor.
The main result is that none of the submissions outperform the monolingual German
baseline according to Meteor.
All of the
submissions are statistically significantly different compared to the baseline.
However,
the CMU NeuralEncoderDecoder C submission
marginally outperformed the baseline according
to TER and equalled its BLEU score.
asked to evaluate the semantic relatedness between
the source sentence in English and the target sentence in German or French. The image was shown
along with the source sentence and the candidate
translation and evaluators were told to rely on the
image when necessary to obtain a better understanding of the source sentence (e.g. in cases where
the text was ambiguous). Note that the reference
sentence is not displayed during the evaluation, in
order to avoid influencing the assessor. Figure 3
shows an example of the direct assessment interface used in the evaluation. The score of each translation candidate ranges from 0 (meaning that the
meaning of the source is not preserved in the target
language sentence) to 100 (meaning the meaning
of the source is “perfectly” preserved). The human
assessment scores are standardized according to
each individual assessor’s overall mean and standard deviation score. The overall score of a given
system (z) corresponds to the mean standardized
score of its translations.
5
The French outputs were evaluated by seven assessors, who conducted a total of 2,521 DAs, resulting
in a minimum of 319 and a maximum of 368 direct
assessments per system submission, respectively.
The German outputs were evaluated by 25 assessors, who conducted a total of 3,485 DAs, resulting
in a minimum of 291 and a maximum of 357 direct
assessments per system submission, respectively.
This is somewhat less than the recommended number of 500, so the results should be considered
preliminary.
Tables 9 and 10 show the results of the human evaluation for the English to German and
the English to French Multimodal Translation task
(Multi30K 2017 test data). The systems are ordered
by standardized mean DA scores and clustered ac-
Human Judgement Results
This year, we conducted a human evaluation in addition to the text-similarity metrics to assess the
translation quality of the submissions. This evaluation was undertaken for the Task 1 German and
French outputs for the Multi30K 2017 test data.
This section describes how we collected the human assessments and computed the results. We
would like to gratefully thank all assessors.
5.1
Methodology
The system outputs were manually evaluated by
bilingual Direct Assessment (DA) (Graham et al.,
2015) using the Appraise platform (Federmann,
2012). The annotators (mostly researchers) were
5.2
Results
Figure 3: Example of the human direct assessment evaluation interface.
cording to the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at p-level
p ≤ 0.05. Systems within a cluster are considered tied. The Wilcoxon signed-rank scores can be
found in Tables 11 and 12 in Appendix A.
When comparing automatic and human evaluations, we can observe that they globally agree
with each other, as shown in Figures 4 and
5, with German showing better agreement than
French. We point out two interesting disagreements: First, in the English→French language pair,
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C and DCUADAPT MultiMT C are significantly better than
LIUMCVC MNMT C, despite the fact that the latter system achieves much higher metric scores. Secondly, across both languages, the text-only LIUMCVC NMT C system performs well on metrics but
does relatively poorly on human judgements, especially as compared to the multimodal version of
the same system.
6
Discussion
Visual Features: do they help? Three teams
provided text-only counterparts to their multimodal
systems for Task 1 (CUNI, LIUMCVC, and OREGONSTATE), which enables us to evaluate the
contribution of visual features. For many systems,
visual features did not seem to help reliably, at least
as measured by metric evaluations: in German,
the CUNI and OREGONSTATE text-only systems
outperformed the counterparts, while in French,
there were small improvements for the CUNI multimodal system. However, the LIUMCVC multimodal system outperformed their text-only system
across both languages.
The human evaluation results are perhaps more
promising: nearly all the highest ranked systems
(with the exception of NICT) are multimodal.
An intruiging result was the text-only LIUMCVC NMT C, which ranked highly on metrics but
poorly in the human evaluation. The LIUMCVC
systems were indistinguishable from each other in
terms of Meteor scores but the standardized mean
direct assessment score showed a significant difference in performance (see Tables 11 and 12):
further analysis of the reasons for humans disliking
the text-only translations will be necessary.
The multimodal Task 1 submissions can be
broadly categorised into three groups based on
how they use the images: approaches useing
double-attention mechanisms, initialising the hidden state of the encoder and/or decoder networks
with the global image feature vector, and alternative uses of image features. The doubleattention models calculate context vectors over
the source language hidden states and locationpreserving feature vectors over the image; these
vectors are used as inputs to the translation decoder (CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT). Encoder and/or decoder initialisation involves initialising the recurrent neural network with an
affine transformation of a global image feature vector (DCU-ADAPT MultiMT, OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation) or initialising the
encoder and decoder with the 1000 dimension softmax probability vector over the object
classes in ImageNet object recognition challenge
NICT NMTrerank C
54
LIUMCVC NMT C
LIUMCVC MNMT C
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
52
Meteor
50
48
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT U
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT U
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
46
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
44
42
40
−1
SHEF ShefClassProj C
Baseline
−0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2
0
0.2
0.4
Human judgments (z)
0.6
0.8
1
Figure 4: System performance on the English→German Multi30K 2017 test data as measured by human
evaluation against Meteor scores. The AFRL-OHIOSTATE-MULTIMODAL U system has been ommitted
for readability.
74
LIUMCVC MNMT C
72
NICT NMTrerank C
LIUMCVC NMT C
Meteor
70
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
68
66
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
64
Baseline
62
60
−1
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
−0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2
0
0.2
0.4
Human judgments (z)
0.6
0.8
1
Figure 5: System performance on the English→French Multi30K 2017 test data as measured by human
evaluation against Meteor scores.
#
Raw
z
English→German
System
1
77.8
0.665
LIUMCVC MNMT C
2
74.1
0.552
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
3
70.3
68.1
68.1
65.1
60.6
59.7
55.9
54.4
54.2
53.3
49.4
46.6
0.437
0.325
0.311
0.196
0.136
0.08
-0.049
-0.091
-0.108
-0.144
-0.266
-0.37
NICT NMTrerank C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT U
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
LIUMCVC NMT C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT U
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
15
39.0
36.6
-0.615
-0.674
Baseline (text-only NMT)
AFRL-OHIOSTATE MULTIMODAL U
Table 9: Results of the human evaluation of the WMT17 English-German Multimodal Translation task
(Multi30K 2017 test data). Systems are ordered by standardized mean DA scores (z) and clustered
according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test at p-level p ≤ 0.05. Systems within a cluster are considered tied,
although systems within a cluster may be statistically significantly different from each other (see Table 11).
Systems using unconstrained data are identified with a gray background.
(SHEF ShefClassInitDec). The alternative uses
of the image features include element-wise multiplication of the target language embeddings
with an affine transformation of a global image feature vector (LIUMCVC MNMT), summing the source language word embeddings
with affine-transformed 1000 dimension softmax probability vector (SHEF ShefClassProj), using the visual features in a retrieval framework
(AFRL-OHIOSTATE MULTIMODAL), and learning visually-grounded encoder representations by
learning to predict the global image feature vector from the source language hidden states (UvATiCC IMAGINATION).
Overall, the metric and human judgement results
in Sections 4 and 5 indicate that there is still a
wide scope for exploration of the best way to integrate visual and textual information. In particular,
the alternative approaches proposed in the LIUMCVC MNMT and UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION
submissions led to strong performance in both the
metric and human judgement results, surpassing
the more common approaches using initialisation
and double attention.
Finally, the text-only NICT system ranks highly
across both languages. This system uses hierarchical phrase-based MT with a reranking step based on
a neural text-only system, since their multimodal
system never outperformed the text-only variant in
development (Zhang et al., 2017). This is in line
with last year’s results and the strong Moses baseline (Specia et al., 2016), and suggests a continuing
role for phrase-based MT for small homogeneous
datasets.
Unconstrained systems The Multi30k dataset is
relatively small, so unconstrained systems use more
data to complement the image description translations. Three groups submitted systems using external resources: UvA-TiCC, CUNI, and AFRLOHIOSTATE. The unconstrained UvA-TiCC and
CUNI submissions always outperformed their respective constrained variants by 2–3 Meteor points
and achieved higher standardized mean DA scores.
These results suggest that external parallel text corpora (UvA-TiCC and CUNI) and external monolingual image description datasets (UvA-TiCC) can
usefully improve the quality of multimodal translation models.
However, tuning to the target domain remains important, even for relatively simple image captions.
#
Raw
z
English→French
System
1
79.4
74.2
74.1
0.446
0.307
0.3
NICT NMTrerank C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
4
71.2
65.4
61.9
60.8
60.5
0.22
0.056
-0.041
-0.078
-0.079
LIUMCVC MNMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
LIUMCVC NMT C
9
54.7
54.0
-0.254
-0.282
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
11
44.1
-0.539
Baseline (text-only NMT)
Table 10: Results of the human evaluation of the WMT17 English-French Multimodal Translation
task (Multi30K 2017 test data). Systems are ordered by standardized mean DA score (z) and clustered
according to Wilcoxon signed-rank test at p-level p ≤ 0.05. Systems within a cluster are considered
tied, although systems within a cluster may be statistically significantly different from each other (see
Table 12).
We ran the best-performing English→German
WMT’16 news translation system (Sennrich et al.,
2016a) on the English→German Multi30K 2017
test data to gauge the performance of a state-ofthe-art text-only translation system trained on only
out-of-domain resources5 . It ranked 10th in terms
of Meteor (49.9) and 11th in terms of BLEU (29.0),
placing it firmly in the middle of the pack, and below nearly all the text-only submissions trained on
the in-domain Multi30K dataset.
The effect of OOV words The Multi30k translation training and test data are very similar, with
a low OOV rate in the Flickr test set (1.7%). In
the 2017 test set, 16% of English test sentences
include a OOV word. Human evaluation gave the
impression that these often led to errors propagated
throughout the whole sentence. Unconstrained systems may perform better by having larger vocabularies, as well as more robust statistics. When we
evaluate the English→German systems over only
the 161 OOV-containing test sentences, the highest ranked submission by all metrics is the unconstrained UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION submission,
with +2.5 Metor and +2.2 BLEU over the second
best system (LIUMCVC NMT; 45.6 vs 43.1 Meteor and 24.0 vs 21.8 BLEU).
The difference over non-OOV-containing sen5
http://data.statmt.org/rsennrich/
wmt16_systems/en-de/
tences is not nearly as stark, with constrained systems all performing best (both LIUMCVC systems,
MNMT and NMT, with 56.6 and 56.3 Meteor, respectively) but unconstrained systems following
close behind (UvA-TiCC with 55.4 Meteor, CUNI
with 53.4 Meteor).
Ambiguous COCO dataset We introduced a
new evaluation dataset this year with the aim of
testing systems’ ability to use visual features to
identify word senses.
However, it is unclear whether visual features
improve performance on this test set. The text-only
NICT NMTrerank system performs competitively,
ranking in the top three submissions for both languages. We find mixed results for submissions
with text-only and multimodal counterparts (CUNI,
LIUMCVC, OREGONSTATE): LIUMCVC’s multimodal system improves over the text-only system
for French but not German, while the visual features help for German but not French in the CUNI
and OREGONSTATE systems.
We plan to perform a further analysis on the
extent of translation ambiguity in this dataset. We
will also continue to work on other methods for
constructing datasets in which textual ambiguity
can be disambiguated by visual information.
Multilingual Image Description It proved difficult for Task 2 systems to use the English data to
improve over the monolingual German baseline.
In future iterations of the task, we will consider
a lopsided data setting, in which there is much
more English data than target language data. This
setting is more realistic and will push the use of
multilingual data. We also hope to conduct human
evaluation to better assess performance because automatic metrics are problematic for this task (Elliott
and Keller, 2014; Kilickaya et al., 2017).
No. ANR-15-CHR2-0006-01 – Loı̈c Barrault and
Fethi Bougares), and by the MultiMT project (EU
H2020 ERC Starting Grant No. 678017 – Lucia
Specia). Desmond Elliott acknowledges the support of NWO Vici Grant No. 277-89-002 awarded
to K. Sima’an, and an Amazon Academic Research
Award. We thank Josiah Wang for his help in selecting the Ambiguous COCO dataset.
7
A Significance tests
Conclusions
We presented the results of the second shared task
on multimodal translation and multilingual image
description. The shared task attracted submissions
from nine groups, who submitted a total of 19 systems across the tasks. The Multimodal Translation task attracted the majority of the submissions.
Human judgements for the translation task were
collected for the first time this year and ranked
systems broadly in line with the automatic metrics.
The main findings of the shared task are:
(i) There is still scope for novel approaches to
integrating visual and linguistic features in
multilingual multimodal models, as demonstrated by the winning systems.
(ii) External resources have an important role to
play in improving the performance of multimodal translation models beyond what can be
learned from limited training data.
(iii) The differences between text-only and multimodal systems are being obfuscated by the
well-known shortcomings of text-similarity
metrics. Multimodal systems often seem to
be prefered by humans but not rewarded by
metrics. Future research on this topic, encompassing both multimodal translation and multilingual image description, should be evaluated
using human judgements.
In future editions of the task, we will encourage
participants to submit the output of single decoder
systems to better understand the empirical differences between approaches. We are also considering
a Multilingual Multimodal Translation challenge,
where the systems can observe two language inputs
alongside the image to encourage the development
of multi-source multimodal models.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CHIST-ERA
M2CR project (French National Research Agency
Tables 11 and 12 show the Wilcoxon signed-rank
test used to create the clustering of the systems.
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
2.8e-2
3.1e-4
NICT NMTrerank C
4.9e-2
4.8e-5
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT U
-
1.8e-2
1.1e-6
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
-
1.2e-3
4.5e-8
LIUMCVC NMT C
1.3e-2
4.3e-2
-
6.8e-5
6.6e-10
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT U
1.6e-3
1.3e-2
4.0e-2
-
3.5e-6
6.2e-13
8.1e-5
6.8e-4
4.9e-3
-
2.0e-8
7.9e-18
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
9.6e-8
2.4e-6
3.0e-5
5.7e-3
1.7e-2
-
3.2e-12
1.0e-18
OREGONSTATE 2NMT C
1.0e-8
4.9e-7
3.3e-6
1.4e-3
5.7e-3
2.8e-2
-
2.1e-13
2.9e-17
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
4.6e-8
1.3e-6
1.3e-5
2.2e-3
5.6e-3
3.3e-2
-
4.7e-12
3.2e-18
OREGONSTATE 1NMT C
9.8e-9
3.1e-7
2.2e-6
7.5e-4
2.8e-3
1.3e-2
-
5.6e-13
5.2e-26
SHEF ShefClassProj C
1.3e-13
1.6e-11
1.4e-10
2.2e-06
4.5e-06
6.2e-05
6.5e-03
1.9e-02
4.7e-02
-
3.2e-19
1.2e-30
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
2.2e-17
6.8e-15
5.3e-14
8.5e-09
2.7e-08
3.3e-07
1.5e-04
1.1e-03
3.3e-03
1.2e-02
-
9.1e-24
2.2e-26
3.8e-23
9.8e-23
2.0e-15
1.2e-15
3.5e-14
1.5e-10
2.0e-09
8.3e-08
9.1e-07
4.7e-05
2.0e-03
3.9e-33
5.5e-41
BASELINE
LIUMCVC MNMT C
Table 11: English → German Wilcoxon signed-rank test at p-level p ≤ 0.05. ‘-’ means that the value is higher than 0.05.
BASELINE
AFRL-OHIOSTATE MULTIMODAL C
NICT NMTrerank C
CUNI NMT U
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
LIUMCVC NMT C
CUNI MNMT U
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
CUNI NMMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NMT C
CUNI NMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NMT C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION U
LIUMCVC MNMT C
UvA-TiCC IMAGINATION C
English→German
-
4.0e-28
4.7e-25
2.4e-24
4.0e-17
9.7e-18
5.0e-16
1.7e-12
3.6e-11
2.1e-09
2.6e-08
1.3e-06
1.2e-04
1.2e-34
3.1e-43
AFRL-OHIOSTATE MULTIMODAL C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
-
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
-
LIUMCVC MNMT C
1.0e-03
8.8e-03
2.2e-02
-
2.5e-05
2.9e-04
1.3e-03
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
1.7e-02
-
5.5e-08
5.2e-07
6.7e-06
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
2.7e-03
-
1.5e-09
5.0e-08
7.9e-07
LIUMCVC NMT C
1.2e-02
-
1.8e-07
2.9e-06
2.3e-05
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
5.3e-07
1.7e-04
7.7e-03
2.4e-02
1.8e-02
2.2e-16
2.4e-14
2.2e-12
-
2.0e-06
1.8e-04
7.7e-03
1.8e-02
1.6e-02
6.8e-15
1.1e-13
1.3e-11
SHEF ShefClassProj C
NICT NMTrerank C
3.2e-04
1.8e-03
5.9e-14
7.3e-11
5.0e-08
2.3e-07
5.6e-07
5.8e-26
2.3e-24
3.9e-21
Table 12: English → French Wilcoxon signed-rank test at p-level p ≤ 0.05. ‘-’ means that the value is higher than 0.05.
BASELINE
SHEF ShefClassInitDec C
SHEF ShefClassProj C
LIUMCVC MNMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyTextualMT C
OREGONSTATE 1NeuralTranslation C
LIUMCVC NMT C
NICT NMTrerank C
CUNI NeuralMonkeyMultimodalMT C
DCU-ADAPT MultiMT C
OREGONSTATE 2NeuralTranslation C
English→French
BASELINE
References
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua
Bengio. 2015. Neural machine translation by
jointly learning to align and translate. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Learning Representations.
Raffaella Bernardi, Ruket Cakici, Desmond Elliott,
Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis,
Frank Keller, Adrian Muscat, and Barbara Plank.
2016. Automatic description generation from
images: A survey of models, datasets, and evaluation measures. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 55:409–442.
Ozan Caglayan, Walid Aransa, Adrien Bardet, Mercedes Garcı́a-Martı́nez, Fethi Bougares, Loı̈c
Barrault, Marc Masana, Luis Herranz, and Joost
van de Weijer. 2017. LIUM-CVC Submissions
for WMT17 Multimodal Translation Task. In
Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers. pages 432–439.
Ozan Caglayan, Loı̈c Barrault, and Fethi Bougares.
2016. Multimodal attention for neural machine
translation. CoRR abs/1609.03976.
Ozan Caglayan, Mercedes Garcı́a-Martı́nez,
Adrien Bardet, Walid. Aransa, Fethi. Bougares,
and Loı̈c Barrault. 2017. NMTPY: A Flexible Toolkit for Advanced Neural Machine
Translation Systems. CoRR 1706.00457.
Iacer Calixto, Koel Dutta Chowdhury, and Qun
Liu. 2017a. DCU System Report on the WMT
2017 Multi-modal Machine Translation Task. In
Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers. pages 440–444.
Iacer Calixto, Qun Liu, and Nick Campbell.
2017b. Incorporating Global Visual Features
into Attention-Based Neural Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on
Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
Xinlei Chen, Hao Fang, Tsung-Yi Lin, Ramakrishna Vedantam, Saurabh Gupta, Piotr Dollár,
and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2015. Microsoft
COCO captions: Data collection and evaluation
server. CoRR abs/1504.00325.
Jonathan H Clark, Chris Dyer, Alon Lavie, and
Noah A Smith. 2011. Better hypothesis testing
for statistical machine translation: Controlling
for optimizer instability. In 49th Annual Meeting
of the Association for Computational Linguistics:
Human Language Technologies. pages 176–181.
Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li,
Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A
Large-Scale Hierarchical Image Database. In
IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pages 248–255.
Michael Denkowski and Alon Lavie. 2014. Meteor
universal: Language specific translation evaluation for any target language. In EACL 2014
Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation.
John Duselis, Michael Hutt, Jeremy Gwinnup,
James Davis, and Joshua Sandvick. 2017. The
AFRL-OSU WMT17 Multimodal Translation
System: An Image Processing Approach. In
Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers. pages 445–449.
Desmond Elliott, Stella Frank, and Eva Hasler.
2015. Multi-language image description with
neural sequence models. CoRR abs/1510.04709.
Desmond Elliott, Stella Frank, Khalil Simaan, and
Lucia Specia. 2016. Multi30k: Multilingual
english-german image descriptions. In 5th Workshop on Vision and Language. pages 70–74.
Desmond Elliott and Ákos Kádár. 2017. Imagination improves Multimodal Translation. CoRR
abs/1705.04350.
Desmond Elliott and Frank Keller. 2014. Comparing automatic evaluation measures for image
description. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual
Meeting of the Association for Computational
Linguistics: Short Papers. pages 452–457.
Gertrud Faaß and Kerstin Eckart. 2013. SdeWaC–a
corpus of parsable sentences from the web. In
Language processing and knowledge in the Web,
Springer, pages 61–68.
Christian Federmann. 2012. Appraise: An opensource toolkit for manual evaluation of machine
translation output. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 98:25–35.
Spandana Gella, Mirella Lapata, and Frank Keller.
2016. Unsupervised visual sense disambiguation for verbs using multimodal embeddings. In
2016 Conference of the North American Chapter
of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. San Diego,
California, pages 182–192.
Yvette Graham, Timothy Baldwin, Alistair Moffat,
and Justin Zobel. 2015. Can machine translation systems be evaluated by the crowd alone.
Natural Language Engineering 23(1):3–30.
Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and
Jian Sun. 2016. Deep residual learning for image
recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition. pages 770–778.
Jindřich Helcl and Jindřich Libovický. 2017. CUNI
System for the WMT17 Multimodal Translation
Task. In Proceedings of the Second Conference
on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task
Papers. pages 450–457.
Julian Hitschler, Shigehiko Schamoni, and Stefan
Riezler. 2016. Multimodal Pivots for Image Caption Translation. In 54th Annual Meeting of
the Association for Computational Linguistics.
pages 2399–2409.
Alan Jaffe. 2017. Generating Image Descriptions
using Multilingual Data. In Proceedings of the
Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers. pages 458–464.
Douwe Kiela. 2016. MMFeat: A toolkit for extracting multi-modal features. In Proceedings of
ACL-2016 System Demonstrations. pages 55–60.
Mert Kilickaya, Aykut Erdem, Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis,
and Erkut Erdem. 2017. Re-evaluating automatic
metrics for image captioning. In Proceedings of
EACL 2017. pages 199–209.
Philipp Koehn, Hieu Hoang, Alexandra Birch,
Chris Callison-Burch, Marcello Federico, Nicola
Bertoldi, Brooke Cowan, Wade Shen, Christine
Moran, Richard Zens, et al. 2007. Moses: Open
source toolkit for statistical machine translation.
In 45th Annual meeting of Association for Computational Linguistics. pages 177–180.
D.T. Le, R. Bernardi, and J.R.R. Uijlings. 2014.
TUHOI: Trento Universal Human Object Interaction Dataset. In Vision and Language Workshop at the 26th International Conference on
Computational Linguistics.
Xirong Li, Weiyu Lan, Jianfeng Dong, and Hailong
Liu. 2016. Adding chinese captions to images. In
Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on International
Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. pages 271–
275.
Jindřich Libovický and Jindřich Helcl. 2017. Attention strategies for multi-source sequence-tosequence learning. CoRR abs/1704.06567.
Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie,
Lubomir D. Bourdev, Ross B. Girshick, James
Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr
Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. 2014. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context.
CoRR abs/1405.0312.
Minh-Thang Luong, Hieu Pham, and Christopher D Manning. 2015. Effective approaches
to attention-based neural machine translation. In
Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
pages 1412–1421.
Mingbo Ma, Dapeng Li, Kai Zhao, and Liang
Huang. 2017. OSU Multimodal Machine Translation System Report. In Proceedings of the
Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2: Shared Task Papers. pages 465–469.
Pranava Swaroop Madhyastha, Josiah Wang, and
Lucia Specia. 2017. Sheffield MultiMT: Using
Object Posterior Predictions for Multimodal Machine Translation. In Proceedings of the Second
Conference on Machine Translation, Volume 2:
Shared Task Papers. pages 470–476.
Takashi Miyazaki and Nobuyuki Shimizu. 2016.
Cross-lingual image caption generation. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pages
1780–1790.
Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational
Linguistics. Sapporo, Japan, pages 160–167.
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and
Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In
40th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. pages 311–318.
Janarthanan Rajendran, Mitesh M Khapra, Sarath
Chandar, and Balaraman Ravindran. 2016.
Bridge correlational neural networks for multilingual multimodal representation learning. In
Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North
American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. pages 171–181.
Olga Russakovsky, Jia Deng, Hao Su, Jonathan
Krause, Sanjeev Satheesh, Sean Ma, Zhiheng Huang, Andrej Karpathy, Aditya Khosla,
Michael Bernstein, Alexander C. Berg, and
Li Fei-Fei. 2015. ImageNet Large Scale Visual
Recognition Challenge. International Journal of
Computer Vision (IJCV) 115(3):211–252.
Mike Schuster and Kaisuke Nakajima. 2012.
Japanese and korean voice search. In 2012 IEEE
International Conference on Acoustics, Speech
and Signal Processing (ICASSP). pages 5149–
5152.
Rico Sennrich, Orhan Firat, Kyunghyun Cho,
Alexandra Birch, Barry Haddow, Julian
Hitschler, Marcin Junczys-Dowmunt, Samuel
Läubli, Antonio Valerio Miceli Barone, Jozef
Mokry, et al. 2017. Nematus: a toolkit for neural
machine translation. In Software Demonstrations of the 15th Conference of the European
Chapter of the Association for Computational
Linguistics. pages 65–68.
Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra
Birch. 2016a. Edinburgh neural machine translation systems for WMT 16. In Proceedings of
the First Conference on Machine Translation.
Rico Sennrich, Barry Haddow, and Alexandra
Birch. 2016b. Neural machine translation of
rare words with subword units. In 54th Annual
Meeting of the Association for Computational
Linguistics. Berlin, Germany, pages 1715–1725.
Matthew Snover, Bonnie Dorr, Richard Schwartz,
Linnea Micciulla, and John Makhoul. 2006. A
study of translation edit rate with targeted human
annotation. In Proceedings of Association for
Machine Translation in the Americas.
Lucia Specia, Stella Frank, Khalil Sima’an, and
Desmond Elliott. 2016. A shared task on multimodal machine translation and crosslingual image description. In First Conference on Machine
Translation. pages 543–553.
Christian Szegedy, Vincent Vanhoucke, Sergey
Ioffe, Jonathon Shlens, and Zbigniew Wojna.
2015. Rethinking the inception architecture for
computer vision. CoRR abs/1512.00567.
Jörg Tiedemann. 2012. Parallel data, tools and
interfaces in opus. In Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation
(LREC’12).
Mesut Erhan Unal, Begum Citamak, Semih
Yagcioglu, Aykut Erdem, Erkut Erdem, Nazli Ikizler Cinbis, and Ruket Cakici. 2016.
Tasviret:
Görüntülerden otomatik türkçe
açıklama oluşturma İçin bir denektaçı veri
kümesi (TasvirEt: A benchmark dataset for automatic Turkish description generation from images). In IEEE Sinyal İşleme ve İletişim Uygulamaları Kurultayı (SIU 2016).
Emiel van Miltenburg, Desmond Elliott, and Piek
Vossen. 2017. Cross-linguistic differences and
similarities in image descriptions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on
Natural Language Generation.
Yuya Yoshikawa, Yutaro Shigeto, and Akikazu
Takeuchi. 2017. Stair captions: Constructing
a large-scale japanese image caption dataset.
CoRR abs/1705.00823.
Peter Young, Alice Lai, Micah Hodosh, and Julia
Hockenmaier. 2014. From image descriptions
to visual denotations: New similarity metrics
for semantic inference over event descriptions.
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2:67–78.
Jingyi Zhang, Masao Utiyama, Eiichro Sumita,
Graham Neubig, and Satoshi Nakamura. 2017.
NICT-NAIST System for WMT17 Multimodal
Translation Task. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Machine Translation, Volume
2: Shared Task Papers. Copenhagen, Denmark,
pages 477–482.
| 1cs.CV
|
Noname manuscript No.
(will be inserted by the editor)
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of
Artificial Neural Networks ⋆
arXiv:1106.1194v2 [cs.NE] 19 Sep 2013
Angelos A. Anastassi
Abstract A methodology that can generate the optimal coefficients of a numeri-
cal method with the use of an artificial neural network is presented in this work.
The network can be designed to produce a finite difference algorithm that solves
a specific system of ordinary differential equations numerically. The case we are
examining here concerns an explicit two-stage Runge-Kutta method for the numerical solution of the two-body problem. Following the implementation of the
network, the latter is trained to obtain the optimal values for the coefficients of
the Runge-Kutta method. The comparison of the new method to others that are
well known in the literature proves its efficiency and demonstrates the capability
of the network to provide efficient algorithms for specific problems.
Keywords Feedforward artificial neural networks, Gradient descent, Backprop-
agation, Initial value problems, Ordinary differential equations, Runge-Kutta
methods
1 Introduction
The literature that involves solving ordinary or partial differential equations with
the use of artificial neural networks is quite limited, but has grown significantly in
the past decade. To name a few, Dissanayake et al. used a ”universal approximator” (see [1][2]) to transform the numerical problem of solving partial differential
equations to an unconstrained minimization problem of an objective function [3].
Meade et al. demonstrated feedforward neural networks that could approximate
linear and nonlinear ordinary differential equations [4][5]. Puffer et al. constructed
cellular neural networks that were able to approximate the solution of various
⋆ The final publication is available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00521013-1476-x
A.A. Anastassi
Department of Informatics,
University of Piraeus,
Karaoli & Dimitriou 80,
18534 Piraeus, GREECE
E-mail: [email protected]
2
Angelos A. Anastassi
partial differential equations [6]. Lagaris et al. introduced a method for the solution of initial and boundary value problems, that consists of an invariable part,
which satisfies by construction the initial/boundary conditions and an artificial
neural network, which is trained to satisfy the differential equation [7]. S. He et
al. used feedforward neural networks to solve a special class of linear first-order
partial differential equations [8]. The radial basis function (RBF) network architecture [10] has also been used for the solution of differential equations in [9],
where Jianyu et al. demonstrated a method for solving linear ordinary differential
equations based on multiquadric RBF networks. Ramuhalli et al. proposed an artificial neural network with an embedded finite-element model, for the solution of
partial differential equations [11]. Tsoulos et al. demonstrated a hybrid method for
the solution of ordinary and partial differential equations, which employed neural
networks, based on the use of grammatical evolution, periodically enhanced using
a local optimization procedure [12].
In all the aforementioned cases, the neural networks functioned as direct solvers
of differential equations. In this work, however, we use the constructed neural network, not as a direct solver, but as a means to generate proper Runge-Kutta
coefficients. In this aspect, there has been little relevant published material. For
instance in [13], Tsitouras constructs a multilayer feedforward neural network that
uses input data associated with an initial value problem and trains the network to
produce the solution of this problem as output data, thus generating (by construction of the network) coefficients for a predefined number of Runge-Kutta stages.
In this work we construct an artificial neural network that can generate the coefficients of two-stage Runge-Kutta methods. We consider the two-body problem,
which is a typical case of an initial value problem where Runge-Kutta methods
apply, and therefore the resulting method is specialized in solving it. The comparison shows that the new method is more efficient than the classical methods
and thus proves the capability of the constructed neural network to create new
Runge-Kutta methods.
The structure is as follows: in Sections 2 and 3 we present the basic theory for
Runge-Kutta methods and Artificial Neural Networks respectively. In Section 4
we present the implementation of the neural network that applies to a two-stage
Runge-Kutta method which solves the two-body problem numerically, while in
Section 5 the derivation of the method is provided. In Section 6 we demonstrate
the final results along with the comparison of the new method to other well-known
methods and finally in Section 7 we reach some conclusions about this work.
2 Runge-Kutta methods
We consider a two-stage Runge-Kutta method to solve the first order initial value
problem
v′ (t) = f (t, v) and v(t0 ) = v0
(1)
At each step of the integration interval, we approximate the solution of the initial
value problem at tn+1 , where tn+1 = tn + h. For the two-stage Runge-Kutta
method, the approximate solution vn+1 is given by
v n + 1 = v n + h ( b1 k 1 + b2 k 2 )
(2)
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
⋆
3
where
k 1 = f ( tn , v n )
(3)
k2 = f (tn + c2 h, vn + h a21 k1 )
(4)
The coefficients for this set of methods can be presented by the Butcher tableau
given below
c2
a21
b1
b2
An explicit two-stage Runge-Kutta method can be of second algebraic order at
most (see [14]). In order for that to hold, the following conditions must be satisfied
b1 + b2 = 1
(5)
1
(6)
2
The extra condition that needs to be satisfied in order for the method to be
consistent is
a21 = c2
(7)
b2 c2 =
3 Artificial Neural Networks
An artificial neural network (ANN) is a network of interconnected artificial
processing elements (called neurons) that co-operate with each other in order to
solve specific problems. ANNs are inspired by the structure and functional aspects
of biological nervous systems and therefore present a resemblance. Haykin in [15]
defines an artificial neural network as ”a massively parallel distributed processor
that has a natural propensity for storing experiential knowledge and making it
available for use”. ANNs, similarly to brains, acquire knowledge through a learning
process, which is called training. That knowledge is stored in the form of synaptic
weights, whose values express the strength of the connection between two neurons.
There are many types of artificial neural networks, depending on the structure
and the means of training. An ANN, in its simplest form, consists of a single
neuron, in what we call the Perceptron model. The Perceptron is connected with
a number of inputs: x1 , x2 , ..., xn . A weight corresponds to each of the neuron’s
connections with the inputs and expresses the specific input’s significance to the
calculation of the Perceptron’s output. Therefore, there is a number of weights
equal to the number of inputs, with wi being the weight that corresponds to input
xi , and wi xi being the combined weighted input. The neuron is also connected with
a weight, which is not connected with any input and is called bias (symbolized
by b). The weighted input data are essentially being mapped to an output value,
through the transfer function of the neuron. The transfer function consists of the
net input function and the activation function. The first function undertakes
the task of combining the various weighted inputs into a scalar value. Typically,
the summation function is used for this purpose, thus the net input in that case
is described by the following expression
4
Angelos A. Anastassi
Fig. 1 An artificial neuron (Perceptron)
u=
n
X
wi x i + b
(8)
i=1
For ease of use, the bias can be treated as any other weight and be represented
as w0 , with x0 = 1, so the previous expression becomes
u=
n
X
wi x i
(9)
i=0
The activation function receives the output u of the net input function and
produces its own output y (also known as the activation value of the neuron),
which is a scalar value as well. The general form of the activation function is
y = f (u)
(10)
What is required of a neural network, such as the Perceptron, is the ability to
learn. That means the ability to adjust its weights in order to be able to produce
a specific set of output data for a specific set of input data. In the supervised
type of learning (which is used to train the Perceptron and other types of neural
networks), besides the input data, we provide the network with target data,
which are the data that the output should ideally converge to, with the given
set of input. The Perceptron uses an estimation of the error as a measure that
expresses the divergence between the actual output and the target. In that sense,
training is essentially the learning process of adjusting the synaptic weights, in
order to minimize the aforementioned error. To achieve this, a gradient descent
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
⋆
5
algorithm called delta rule is employed, also known as the Least Mean Square
(LMS) method or the Widrow-Hoff rule, developed by Widrow and Hoff in [16].
The training process that uses the delta rule has the following steps:
1. Assign random values to the weights
2. Generate the output data for the set of the training input data
3. Calculate the error E , which is given by a norm of the differences between the
target and the output data
4. Adjust the weights according to the following rule
∆wi = −η
∂E ∂u
∂E
= −η
= ηδxi
∂wi
∂u ∂wi
(11)
Where η is a small positive constant, called learning step or learning rate,
and δ (delta error) is equal to the following expression
δ=−
∂E
∂u
(12)
5. Repeat from step 2, unless the error E is less than a small predefined constant
ǫ or the maximum number of iterations has been reached
With each iteration of the learning method, the weights are adjusted in such
manner as to reduce the error. Notice that the correction ∆wi of the weights is
∂E
, since the desired goal is the minimization of
proportional to the negative of ∂w
i
the error.
Strictly speaking, the Perceptron is not technically a network, since it consists
of a single neuron. An actual network and the most common form of ANNs is
the multilayer Perceptron (MLP), which falls in the general category of feedforward neural networks (FFNNs). Feedforward are the neural networks that
contain no feedback connections, i.e. the connections do not form a loop, but are
instead all directed towards the output of the network. A multilayer Perceptron
consists of various layers, namely the input layer, the output layer, and one or
more hidden layers. The hidden layers are not visible externally of the network,
hence the ”hidden” property. Each of the layers consists of one or more neurons,
except for the input layer, whose input nodes simply function as an entry point
for the input data. Each layer is connected to the previous and the next layer,
thus providing a pathway for the data to travel throughout the network. When a
layer is connected to another, each neuron of the first layer is connected to every
neuron of the second layer. In this way, the output of one layer becomes the input
for the next one. Therefore, to calculate the output of the MLP, the data (either
input data or activation values) are being propagated forward through the neural
network.
To train the MLP, the backpropagation method is used. Backpropagation is
a generalization of the delta rule that is used to train the Perceptron. The method,
essentially, functions in the same way for each neuron of the MLP, as simple delta
rule does for the Perceptron. The difference lies in the fact that, since the learning
procedure requires the calculation of the δ error, the neurons that reside inside the
hidden layers must be provided with the δ errors of the neurons of the next layer.
For this reason, the δ errors are first calculated for the neurons of the output layer
and are propagated backwards (hence the backpropagation term), all across the
network. The procedure is the following:
6
Angelos A. Anastassi
Fig. 2 A typical multilayer Perceptron
1. Assign random values to the weights
2. Generate the activation values of each neuron, starting from the first hidden
layer and continue until the output layer
3. Calculate the error E , which is given by a norm of the differences between the
target and the output data
4. Calculate the δ errors of each neuron of the output layer, according to (12)
5. Calculate the δ errors of each neuron of the previous layer, according to
δ = f ′ (u)
M
X
w i δi
(13)
i=1
Where f (u) is the activation function of the neuron, M is the number of the
neurons in the next layer, and δi is the δ error of the ith neuron of the next
layer
6. Repeat step 5 for the previous layer, until all δ errors for all the hidden layers
have been calculated
7. Adjust the weights according to (11)
8. Repeat from step 2, unless the error E is less than a small predefined constant
ǫ or the maximum number of iterations has been reached
4 Implementation
We introduce a feedforward neural network that can generate the coefficients of
two-stage Runge-Kutta methods, specifically designed to apply to the needs of the
two-body problem. The two-body problem is described by the following system of
equations
p
x
y
x′′ = − 3 , y ′′ = − 3 , r = x2 + y 2
(14)
r
r
whose analytical solution is given by
x = cos t,
y = sin t
(15)
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
⋆
7
Since a Runge-Kutta method can only solve a system of first order ordinary
differential equations, v according to the notation of equation (1), can be given by
v = [v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 ] = x, y, x′ , y ′
(16)
and
h
f (t, v) = v′ (t) = v1′ , v2′ , v3′ , v4′ = v3 , v4 , −
p
v2
v1
, − 3 , r = v12 + v22
r3
r
i
(17)
From now on we will be using x, y, x′ , y ′ , for being more straightforward than
v1 , v2 , v3 , v4 .
The neural network we have constructed has six inputs: The coordinates of
the second body: x and y , the derivatives of the coordinates with respect to the
independent variable t: x′ , y ′ , the steplength h and a ”dummy” input with the
constant value of 1. The input data consist of a matrix, where each column is a
vector, intended to be used by the corresponding input of the network. The matrix
satisfies the following equation
′
xn , yn , x′n , yn
, h, 1 = [cos tn , sin tn , − sin tn , cos tn , h, 1]
(18)
With tn+1 = tn + h, where n = 1, 2, ..., N and N is the number of total steps.
Similarly, the target matrix satisfies the following equation
[xn+1, yn+1 , x′n+1 , yn′ +1 ] = [cos tn+1 , sin tn+1 , − sin tn+1 , cos tn+1 ]
(19)
The input and the target data are generated through a certain procedure. In
this procedure, we set a number of parameters, namely the integration interval
[ts , te ], the x0 , y0 , x′0 , y0′ values that correspond to v0 as notated in equation (1),
and the constant steplength h. With the use of the integration interval and the
steplength, the number of steps N is calculated. For each step, the process generates the input and target data that correspond to the starting and ending point
of the integration step respectively. Thus, two matrices are generated by using the
theoretical solution of the problem and consist of x, y, x′ , y ′ at the beginning and
at the end of each integration step.
Apart from the input layer, the network comprises of thirteen additional layers,
each consisting of a single neuron. Each layer is connected to one or more other
layers, always in a feedforward fashion. Most of the connections have a fixed,
unadjustable weight, whose value is equal to one. Practically, that means that the
significance of the specific connections does not vary in the progress of the training
phase. The connections that do have an adjustable weight are those related with
the three coefficients of the Runge-Kutta method, namely a21 , b1 , and b2 . The
coefficient c2 is equal to a21 , therefore it does not need to be explicitly calculated
through the use of the neural network.
The neural network is constructed in such manner as to replicate the actual
Runge-Kutta methodology and produce the numerical solution for the two-body
problem for each step of the integration. In contrast to the actual methodology,
the approximate solution at the end of each step is not used as a starting point
for the next step, but instead of this, theoretical values are used as starting points
for each step’s calculations.
8
Angelos A. Anastassi
Fig. 3 The constructed neural network
Most of the layers do not use the standard summation function as the net input
function, but a custom one, different in most of the cases. The activation function
in every neuron is the identity function, described by the following equation
y = f (u) = u
(20)
Therefore, the transfer function in each case is, in essence, the net input function.
Below, there is the list of the inputs and the layers of the network, their input and
output connections (with any of the 6 inputs or 13 layers) and in parentheses the
expression that they represent:
Input 1:
– Output connections: layers 1 (k1x′ ), 2 (k1y ′ ), 6 (k2x′ ), 7 (k2y ′ ), 10 (xn+1 )
– Value: xn
Input 2:
– Output connections: layers 1 (k1x′ ), 2 (k1y ′ ), 6 (k2x′ ), 7 (k2y ′ ), 11 (yn+1 )
– Value: yn
Input 3:
– Output connections: layers 8 (k2x ), 10 (xn+1 ), 12 (x′n+1 )
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
⋆
9
– Value: x′n = k1x
Input 4:
′
– Output connections: layers 9 (k2y ), 11 (yn+1 ), 13 (yn
+1 )
′
– Value: yn = k1y
Input 5:
′
– Output connections: layers 3 (h a21 ), 10 (xn+1 ), 11 (yn+1 ), 12 (x′n+1 ), 13 (yn
+1 )
– Value: h
Input 6:
– Output connections: layers 4 (b1 ), 5 (b2 )
– Value: 1
Layer 1:
– Input connections: inputs 1 (xn ), 2 (yn )
– Output connections: layers 6 (k2x′ ), 7 (k2y ′ ), 12 (x′n+1 )
– Net input function: fx′ (xn , yn ) = − √ 2xn 2 3
(
xn +yn )
– Output value: k1x′
Layer 2:
– Input connections: inputs 1 (xn ), 2 (yn )
′
– Output connections: layers 6 (k2x′ ), 7 (k2y ′ ), 13 (yn
+1 )
– Net input function: fy ′ (xn , yn ) = − √ 2yn 2 3
(
xn +yn )
– Output value: k1y ′
Layer 3:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: input 5 (h)
Output connections:P
layers 6 (k2x′ ), 7 (k2y′ ), 8 (k2x ), 9 (k2y )
Net input function:
Output value: h a21
Layer 4:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: input 6 (1)
Output connections:P
layers 10 (xn+1), 11 (yn+1), 12 (x′n+1), 13 (yn′ +1 )
Net input function:
Output value: b1
Layer 5:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: input 6 (1)
Output connections:P
layers 10 (xn+1), 11 (yn+1), 12 (x′n+1), 13 (yn′ +1 )
Net input function:
Output value: b2
Layer 6:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: inputs 1 (xn ), 2 (yn ), layers 1 (k1x′ ), 2 (k1y′ ), 3 (h a21 )
Output connections: layer 12 (x′n+1)
Net input function: f2x′ = fx′ (xn + h a21 k1x′ , yn + h a21 k1y′ )
Output value: k2x′
10
Angelos A. Anastassi
Layer 7:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: inputs 1 (xn ), 2 (yn ), layers 1 (k1x′ ), 2 (k1y′ ), 3 (h a21 )
Output connections: layer 13 (yn′ +1 )
Net input function: f2y′ = fy′ (xn + h a21 k1x′ , yn + h a21 k1y′ )
Output value: k2y′
Layer 8:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: input 3 (x′n = k1x ), layer 3 (h a21 )
Output connections: layer 10 (xn+1)
Net input function: f2 = x′n + h a21 k1x = x′n · (1 + h a21 )
Output value: k2x
Layer 9:
–
–
–
–
Input connections: input 4 (yn′ = k1y ), layer 3 (h a21 )
Output connections: layer 11 (yn+1 )
Net input function: f2 = yn′ + h a21 k1y = yn′ · (1 + h a21 )
Output value: k2y
Layer 10:
– Input connections: inputs 1 (xn ), 3 (x′n = k1x ), 5 (h), layers 4 (b1 ), 5 (b2 ), 8
( k2 x )
– Output connections: network output
– Net input function: f3 = xn + h · (b1 k1x + b2 k2x )
– Output value: xn+1
Layer 11:
′
– Input connections: inputs 2 (yn ), 4 (yn
= k1y ), 5 (h), layers 4 (b1 ), 5 (b2 ), 9
( k2 y )
– Output connections: network output
– Net input function: f3 = yn + h · (b1 k1y + b2 k2y )
– Output value: yn+1
Layer 12:
– Input connections: inputs 3 (x′n = k1x ), 5 (h), layers 1 (k1x′ ), 4 (b1 ), 5 (b2 ), 6
( k2 x ′ )
– Output connections: network output
– Net input function: f3 = x′n + h · (b1 k1x′ + b2 k2x′ )
– Output value: x′n+1
Layer 13:
′
– Input connections: inputs 4 (yn
= k1y ), 5 (h), layers 2 (k1y′ ), 4 (b1 ), 5 (b2 ), 7
( k2 y ′ )
– Output connections: network output
′
– Net input function: f3 = yn
+ h · ( b 1 k1 y ′ + b 2 k2 y ′ )
′
– Output value: yn
+1
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
⋆
11
5 Method derivation
The derivation of the coefficients for the RK method described in (2), includes
certain subroutines:
– Data generation
– Neural network training
– Conversion to fraction
During the data generation phase, we generate the input and target data that
are going to be used to train the neural network. We have used various integration
intervals [ts , te ], from [0, 2π ] up to [0, 200π ] and various steplengths, from h = π4
π
down to 512
. As we mentioned before, the input and the target data are described
by the equations (18) and (19) respectively. Therefore, after the data generation,
we obtain an input matrix of size 6 × N and a target matrix of size 4 × N . Where
N is the number of steps and the following equation holds
N=
te − ts
h
(21)
During the training phase, we use the generated data to train the neural
network. The method used to conduct the training is a variation of the typical backpropagation method, called Gradient Descent with Momentum and
Adaptive Learning Rate Backpropagation or GDX. The back-propagation algorithm and its numerous variants constitute the most popular learning technique
for feedforward neural networks [15]. However, a shortcoming of the original backpropagation algorithm is that it can be easily trapped in local minima. In order
to deal with this disadvantage, the addition of a momentum term has been proposed. GDX includes the momentum term in order to be able to escape from local
minima, but also has been found to present faster convergence and lower training
times compared to other competing methods [17].
Instead of a standard error estimation function, we use a custom one for this
purpose, which is shown below
||Output − Target||∞ + |b1 + b2 − 1| + |a21 b2 −
1
|
2
(22)
The error to be minimized is the maximum absolute difference between the output
and the target data, plus some added expressions to satisfy the algebraic conditions. The terms |b1 + b2 − 1| and |a21 b2 − 12 | are used to satisfy the conditions
(5) and (6) respectively. The coefficient a21 is used interchangeably with c2 , due
to (7).
As a result of the training phase, the obtained coefficients a21 , b1 and b2 satisfy the conditions to a certain degree of accuracy. Additionally, the Runge-Kutta
method constructed with the generated coefficients can produce an output, sufficiently close to the target data.
During the last phase, the coefficient a21 is converted into a fraction to simplify
the method, with an insignificant loss of accuracy. The rest of the coefficients
are calculated with the use of the fractional a21 , in order for the algebraic and
consistency conditions, (5), (6) and (7) respectively, to be satisfied. The coefficients
of the new method are presented in Table 1.
For the current implementation, the number of maximum iterations was set
at 10000. That value was selected empirically, as the neural network provided a
12
Angelos A. Anastassi
solution after approximately 5000 iterations and effectively completed the training,
as it could not improve on the performance any further.
6 Results
The best method was provided by using the integration interval [0, 2π ] and the
π
. Training with other integration intervals and steplengths have
steplength h = 128
returned similar results. 2π represents a full oscillation for the two-body problem,
which in part explains why training over wider intervals does not yield better
results. Apart from the new method, the training has also generated some well
known classical methods, some of which are given later in this section.
We compare the new method with three classical two-stage explicit RungeKutta methods. The corresponding Butcher tableaus of all methods are shown in
Tables 1-4.
11
26
11
26
2
− 11
13
11
Table 1 New method
1
1
1
2
1
2
Table 2 Heun’s method
1
2
1
2
0
1
Table 3 Midpoint method
2
3
2
3
1
4
3
4
Table 4 Third classical method
A comparison between the classical methods and the new method is presented
in figure 4, which regards the numerical integration of the two-body problem over
the interval [0, 1000]. The vertical axis represents the accuracy as expressed by
−log10 (maximum absolute error), while the horizontal axis represents the total
number of function evaluations that are required for the computation. The latter
is provided by the formula F.E. = s · N , where s = 2 and stands for the number of
stages of the RK method and N is the number of total steps. We can see that the
new method is more efficient among all methods compared.
Constructing Runge-Kutta Methods with the Use of Artificial Neural Networks
13
⋆
Two-body Problem
8
7
New Method
Midpoint
Classical 3
Heun
-log10(error)
6
5
4
3
2
1
2.5E+05
2.5E+06
2.5E+07
2.5E+08
Function Evaluations
Fig. 4 Efficiency of the compared methods for the integration of the two-body problem
7 Conclusions
We have constructed an artificial neural network that can generate the optimal
coefficients of an explicit two-stage Runge-Kutta method. The network is specifically designed to apply to the needs of the two-body problem, and therefore the
resulting method is specialized in solving that problem. Following the implementation of the network, the latter is trained to obtain the optimal values for the
coefficients of the method. The comparison has shown that the new method developed in this work is more efficient than other well known methods and thus proved
the capability of the constructed neural network to create new efficient numerical
algorithms.
References
1. Cybenko G (1989) Approximations by superpositions of sigmoidal functions. Mathematics
of Control, Signals, and Systems 2:303–314
2. Hornik K (1991) Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Feedforward Networks. Neural
Networks 4:251–257
3. Dissanayake MWMG, Phan-Thien N (1994) Neural-network-based approximations for
solving partial differential equations. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering 10:195–201
4. Meade AJ Jr, Fernandez AA (1994) The numerical solution of linear ordinary differential
equations by feedforward neural networks. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19:1–25
5. Meade AJ Jr, Fernandez AA (1994) Solution of nonlinear ordinary differential equations
by feedforward neural networks. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 20:19–44
6. Puffer F, Tetzlaff R, Wolf D (1995) Learning algorithm for cellular neural networks (CNN)
solving nonlinear partial differential equations. Conference Proceedings of the International
Symposium on Signals, Systems and Electronics:501–504
14
Angelos A. Anastassi
7. Lagaris IE, Likas A, Fotiadis DI (1998) Artificial neural networks for solving ordinary and
partial differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 9:987–1000
8. He S, Reif K, Unbehauen R S (2000) Multilayer neural networks for solving a class of
partial differential equations. Neural Networks 13:385–396
9. Jianyu L, Siwei L, Yingjian Q, Yaping H (2002) Numerical solution of differential equations
by radial basis function neural networks. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference
on Neural Networks 1:773–777
10. Alexandridis A, Chondrodima E, Sarimveis H (2013) Radial Basis Function Network Training Using a Nonsymmetric Partition of the Input Space and Particle Swarm Optimization.
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 24:219–230
11. Ramuhalli P, Udpa L, Udpa SS (2005) Finite-element neural networks for solving differential equations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 16:1381–1392
12. Tsoulos IG, Gavrilis D, Glavas E (2009) Solving differential equations with constructed
neural networks. Neurocomputing 72(10-12):2385–2391
13. Tsitouras C (2002) Neural Networks with multidimensional transfer functions. IEEE
Transactions on Neural Networks 13:222–228
14. Butcher JC (2003) Numerical methods for ordinary differential equations. Wiley, New
York
15. Haykin S (1999) Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey
16. Widrow B, Hoff ME (1960) Adaptive switching circuits. IRE WESCON Convention Record
4:96–104
17. Yu CC, Liu BD (2002) A back-propagation algorithm with adaptive learning rate and
momentum coefficient. Proceedings of the 2002 International Joint Conference on Neural
Networks 2:1218–1223
| 9cs.NE
|
SPATIAL DIFFUSENESS FEATURES FOR DNN-BASED SPEECH RECOGNITION
IN NOISY AND REVERBERANT ENVIRONMENTS
Andreas Schwarz, Christian Huemmer, Roland Maas, Walter Kellermann
Multimedia Communications and Signal Processing
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU)
Cauerstr. 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
arXiv:1410.2479v2 [cs.CL] 16 Feb 2015
{schwarz, huemmer, maas, wk}@lnt.de
ABSTRACT
We propose a spatial diffuseness feature for deep neural network
(DNN)-based automatic speech recognition to improve recognition accuracy in reverberant and noisy environments. The feature
is computed in real-time from multiple microphone signals without requiring knowledge or estimation of the direction of arrival,
and represents the relative amount of diffuse noise in each time
and frequency bin. It is shown that using the diffuseness feature as an additional input to a DNN-based acoustic model leads
to a reduced word error rate for the REVERB challenge corpus,
both compared to logmelspec features extracted from noisy signals, and features enhanced by spectral subtraction.
Index Terms— Speech Recognition, Reverberation, Diffuse
Noise, Deep Neural Networks
1. INTRODUCTION
In automatic speech recognizers (ASR) based on Gaussian Mixture Models and Hidden Markov Models (GMM-HMM), a wide
variety of transformations and feature extraction steps is currently
being employed with the aim of extracting and normalizing the information contained in the time-domain input signal as efficiently
as possible. Recently, with the development of effective training methods for acoustic models based on multiple-layer neural
networks, which are often summarized under the term “deep neural networks” (DNN) [1], it has become possible for the acoustic
model to learn relationships between features and phonemes to a
higher degree than it is possible with manually implemented feature transformation steps. For example, it has been found that
simple filterbank features outperform mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) [2, 3], and it is conceivable that, given large
amounts of training data and sufficiently complex network structures, time-domain signals may at some point even be directly
used as inputs to a neural network.
Although the trend in ASR goes towards replacing explicit processing stages by implicit learning, for noise- and
reverberation-robust ASR using microphone arrays, spatial information is still predominantly being exploited in a separate speech
The authors would like to thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
(DFG) for supporting this work (contract number KE 890/4-2).
enhancement preprocessor, e.g., in the form of beamforming [4],
multichannel linear prediction [5], blocking matrix-based postfilters [6] or coherence-based postfilters [7]. The single-channel
output of the preprocessor is then used to compute features for
ASR. In some GMM-HMM-based systems, spatial information
is exploited indirectly in uncertainty decoding-based approaches,
e.g., in [8], where the feature uncertainty is derived from a noise
estimate obtained in a multichannel signal enhancement stage.
For DNN-based acoustic models, “noise-aware training” has
been proposed [3], where a noise estimate is appended to the
noisy feature vector. This has been evaluated for stationary noise
estimates [3] and noise-estimates derived from time-frequency
masking [9], but may in principle also be used for noise estimates obtained from spatial processing. In [10] and [11], feature
vectors from multiple microphones are concatenated to form the
input of a DNN-based acoustic model, however, no spatial phase
information is exploited.
Inspired by the trend towards moving more explicit feature
processing steps into the DNN, we propose to exploit spatial information about the diffuseness of the sound field directly by incorporating it into the acoustic model of a DNN-based speech recognizer. The diffuseness estimate is derived from the complex coherence between two omnidirectional microphones and has been
used for signal enhancement based on the assumption that late
reverberation and noise components can be modeled as diffuse
noise [7]. Using the diffuseness as a feature is motivated by the
fact that humans exploit similar spatial information for speech
recognition in reverberant and noisy environments [12, 13], as it
was found that the human auditory system treats spectro-temporal
variations in the interaural coherence as “a perceptual surrogate
for spectro-temporal variations in the energy of speech signals”
[13]. The aim is to learn similar behavior in a DNN-based acoustic model.
We first describe the signal model for the estimation of the
diffuseness from the instantaneous spatial coherence of a reverberated and noisy speech signal. Then, we show how this estimate is integrated into a feature extraction scheme for ASR, and
describe the structure of the DNN-based speech recognizer. Finally, we evaluate the proposed feature on the two-channel task of
the REVERB challenge [14], showing that the proposed approach
outperforms both noisy multi-condition training and multichannel
spectral subtraction-based signal enhancement.
2. BLIND DIFFUSENESS ESTIMATION
We consider a reverberated and noisy speech signal recorded by
two omnidirectional microphones. The signal xi (t) recorded at
the i-th microphone is composed of the desired signal component
si (t) and the undesired noise component ni (t) comprising additive noise and late reverberation, i.e., xi (t) = si (t) + ni (t), i =
1, 2. The microphone, desired, and noise signals are represented
in the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) domain by the corresponding uppercase letters, i.e., Xi (k, f ), Si (k, f ) and Ni (k, f ),
respectively, with the discrete frame index k and continuous frequency f , and the auto- and cross-power spectra Φxi xj (k, f ),
Φsi sj (k, f ), Φni nj (k, f ). Note that the continuous frequency f
is used here for generality; in practice, f denotes discrete values
along the frequency axis. It is assumed that the auto-power spectra of all signal components are identical at both microphones,
i.e., Φsi si (k, f ) = Φs (k, f ), Φni ni (k, f ) = Φn (k, f ). The timeand frequency-dependent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the microphone signals can then be defined as
SNR(k, f ) =
Φs (k, f )
.
Φn (k, f )
(1)
The aim in the following is to estimate the SNR from the coherence of the mixed sound field Γx (k, f ). This coherence is first
estimated as
Φ̂x1 x2 (k, f )
,
Γ̂x (k, f ) = q
Φ̂x1 x1 (k, f )Φ̂x2 x2 (k, f )
where the spectral estimates Φ̂xi xj (k, f ) are obtained by recursive averaging:
Φ̂xi xj (k, f ) = λΦ̂xi xj (k−1, f ) + (1−λ)Xi (k, f )Xj∗ (k, f ), (7)
with a constant forgetting factor λ between 0 and 1. In [15, 7],
it was shown that (3) can be solved for the SNR without requiring knowledge of Γs , using only the assumption that the desired
signal is fully coherent, i.e., |Γs | = 1. This yields a “blind” estimator for the SNR (or coherent-to-diffuse ratio, CDR) from the
mixture coherence Γ̂x (k, f ) which does not require knowledge or
estimation of the signal DOA. The estimator is given in (8) at the
bottom of this page (the indices k and f are omitted for brevity).
The CDR can be transformed into the diffuseness [16]
d
D̂(k, f ) = [CDR(k,
f ) + 1]−1 ,
The complex spatial coherence functions of the desired signal and
noise components are given by
Φs1 s2 (k, f )
Φn1 n2 (k, f )
Γs (f ) =
, Γn (f ) =
,
Φs (k, f )
Φn (k, f )
(2)
and are assumed to be time-invariant, i.e., dependent only on the
spatial characteristics of the signal components. It is furthermore
assumed that signal and noise components are orthogonal, such
that Φx (k, f ) = Φs (k, f ) + Φn (k, f ). The complex spatial coherence of the mixed sound field can then be written as a function of
the SNR and the signal and noise coherence functions:
Γx (k, f ) =
SNR(k, f )Γs (f ) + Γn (f )
.
SNR(k, f ) + 1
(3)
The direct sound is now modeled as a plane wave with an unknown direction of arrival (DOA) and therefore unknown time
difference of arrival ∆t, while the undesired noise and late reverberation component is modeled as a diffuse (spherically isotropic)
sound field. The corresponding spatial coherence functions for
the direct and diffuse sound components are then given by
Γs (f ) = ej2πf ∆t ,
(4)
d
Γn (f ) = Γdiffuse (f ) = sinc(2πf ),
c
(5)
respectively. The direct signal coherence has a magnitude of one
with an unknown phase determined by the DOA, while the diffuse
noise coherence only depends on the known microphone spacing
d.
2
d
CDR(k,
f) =
Γn Re{Γ̂x } − |Γ̂x | −
(6)
(9)
which can be thought of as the relative amount of diffuse signal
power in the respective time and frequency bin. Since the diffuseness is bounded between 0 and 1, it is more convenient to use as
basis for feature computation than the CDR itself.
3. FEATURE EXTRACTION FOR ASR
Fig. 1 shows the block diagram of the proposed feature extraction
scheme. The microphone signals are first windowed and transformed into the STFT domain. The upper path then corresponds
to a classical feature extraction of NMel -dimensional logmelspec
(often termed “log-filterbank” or “Log FBank”) features, where
the two microphone signals are combined by averaging the spectral powers computed from each microphone, and NMel triangular Mel-scaled weighting filters are applied. The second path
shows the extraction of enhanced logmelspec features, where signal enhancement based on the diffuseness estimate is performed
by multiplication in the STFT domain with a gain factor G(k, f ),
which is computed as described in [7] according to the spectral
magnitude subtraction rule. The third path illustrates the computation of the proposed “meldiffuseness” features: the diffuseness
D̂(k, f ) is estimated as described in the previous section, and
the same NMel triangular Mel weighting filters that are used in
the logmelspec feature extraction are applied to create an output
vector of the dimensionality NMel . Finally, for comparison, the
Mel-weighted magnitude-squared coherence (“melmsc”) is computed as a feature. While the magnitude-squared coherence of a
q
2
2
2
Γ2n Re{Γ̂x } − Γ2n |Γ̂x | + Γ2n − 2 Γn Re{Γ̂x } + |Γ̂x |
2
|Γ̂x | − 1
(8)
Window
X1(k, f )
STFT
|⋅|
2
logmelspec
NSTFT
Window
avg
X2(k, f )
STFT
log
Mel weighting
NMel
|⋅|2
G(k, f )
NSTFT
enhanced logmelspec
log
Mel weighting
NMel
Coherence
estimation
Γˆ x(k, f )
Diffuseness
estimation
ˆ f)
D(k,
meldiffuseness
Mel weighting
NMel
melmsc
|⋅|2
Mel weighting
NMel
Fig. 1. Feature extraction of logmelspec, enhanced logmelspec, meldiffuseness and melmsc features from 2-channel signals.
1 http://www.lms.lnt.de/files/publications/icassp2015-diffuseness.zip
Mel band
a) logmelspec
20
10
100
200
300
0
−5
−10
−15
−20
Mel band
b) enhanced logmelspec
20
10
100
200
300
0
−5
−10
−15
−20
c) meldiffuseness
Mel band
mixed sound field is also related to the amount of diffuse noise,
this relationship is strongly dependent on the signal DOA and the
microphone spacing, therefore the melmsc feature is expected to
perform worse than the proposed diffuseness estimate.
The interesting question is now how using concatenated logmelspec and meldiffuseness features as input to the neural network compares to using logmelspec features which have been enhanced in the STFT domain.
Since the trend in DNN-based acoustic modeling goes towards replacing explicit feature preprocessing and normalization
steps by implicit learning, one might consider using the complex
spatial coherence directly as feature. Note, however, that the proposed diffuseness feature has two significant advantages over the
complex coherence. The complex coherence depends on two additional variables, namely the DOA and the microphone spacing,
both of which would need to be sufficiently represented in the
training data. Moreover, the diffuseness is a characteristic of the
sound field which is independent of the microphone array geometry, and may therefore also be estimated from microphone arrays
with other geometries, e.g., spherical arrays [17] or arrays consisting of directional microphones [18], without requiring adaptation
of the acoustic model.
It is interesting to note that the additional temporal smoothing
which is required for the estimation of the coherence (and therefore the diffuseness) has parallels in the human auditory system,
where reaction to changes in interaural coherence was found to be
more sluggish than reaction to changes in energy [19].
For the results presented in this paper, the time-domain signals (sampled at 16 kHz) are windowed using a 25 ms Hann window with a frame shift of 10 ms and transformed using a 512point DFT, resulting in NSTFT = 257 subbands in the STFT domain. The spatial coherence is estimated using the forgetting factor λ = 0.68. NMel = 24 triangular Mel-scale weighting filters
are used, covering a frequency range from 64 to 8000 Hz. MATLAB code for the feature computation is provided online1 .
Fig. 2 illustrates the features computed from a noisy and reverberated speech signal taken from the multi-condition training set of the REVERB challenge corpus (LargeRoom2). The
coherence-based spectral enhancement visibly reduces the noise
floor and the smearing of the speech features over time. The meld-
20
10
100
200
300
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
frame
Fig. 2. Features for the reverberated utterance “The statute allows
for a great deal of latitude”.
iffuseness clearly highlights portions of the signal where noise or
reverberation components are dominant.
4. DNN-BASED SPEECH RECOGNITION
We employ the Kaldi toolkit [20] as ASR back-end system using
the WSJ0 trigram 5k language model of the REVERB challenge
and 3551 context-dependent triphone-states in the acoustic model.
In a first step, we set up a GMM-HMM baseline system based
on Weninger et al. [4] by extracting 13 mean and variance normalized MFCCs (including the zeroth cepstral coefficient), followed by ±4 frame splicing, linear discriminant analysis (LDA),
maximum likelihood linear transform (MLLT), and feature-space
maximum likelihood linear regression (fMLLR) (see [4, 21] for
a detailed description). After conventional maximum likelihood
training, discriminative training is performed with the boosted
maximum mutual information (bMMI) criterion [4]. The GMM-
Table 1. ASR Word Error Rate for the REVERB challenge evaluation and development test sets.
Recognizer
Feature
GMM-HMM MFCC-LDA-MLLT-fMLLR
logmelspec+∆+∆∆
enhanced logmelspec+∆+∆∆
DNN-HMM
logmelspec+∆+meldiffuseness
logmelspec+∆+melmsc
Room 1
near
far
6.61
7.50
5.74
6.67
6.61
7.12
5.91
6.06
6.17
6.32
SimData
Room 2
near
far
9.42
16.59
7.65
13.92
7.65
12.18
6.94
10.96
7.04
12.25
HMM system is trained on the clean WSJCAM0 Cambridge Read
News REVERB corpus [22]. The alignment of the training data
to the HMM states is then extracted from the clean training data
and used for the later multi-condition training of the DNN-HMM
system. This technique is known to yield better results than a
multi-condition state-frame alignment [9, 23].
The hybrid DNN-HMM Kaldi system is based on “Dan’s implementation” [20] using a maxout network with 2-norm nonlinearities/activation functions and 4 hidden layers, each one with an
input dimension of 2000 and an output dimension of 400.
In accordance with [2, 3], and as described in the previous
section, we extract NMel = 24 static logmelspec coefficients,
with or without applying coherence-based spectral subtraction
enhancement in the STFT domain. Depending on the particular
setup in Table 1, also Delta (∆), acceleration (∆∆), melmsc,
and/or the proposed meldiffuseness features are derived. Mean
and variance normalization and ±5 frame splicing is applied to
the entire resulting feature vector. The training is performed
on the REVERB multi-condition training set [14], consisting of
7861 noisy and reverberated utterances from the WSJCAM0 corpus, using greedy layer-wise supervised training, preconditioned
stochastic gradient descent, “mixing up” [24] as well as final
model combination [24].
5. EVALUATION RESULTS
We evaluate the proposed system using the two-channel task
of the REVERB challenge [14]. The REVERB evaluation test
set consists of ∼5000 reverberated and noisy utterances, partially created by convolution of clean WSJCAM0 utterances with
impulse responses and mixing with recorded noise sequences
(“SimData”), and partially consisting of multichannel recordings
of speakers in a reverberant and noisy room from the MC-WSJAV corpus (“RealData”). For SimData, the reverberation times of
the three rooms are approx. 0.25 s, 0.5 s and 0.7 s and the sourcemicrophone spacing is 0.5 m (near) or 2 m (far). For RealData,
the reverberation time is approx 0.7 s and the source-microphone
distance is 1 m (near) or 2.5 m (far). In both cases, an 8-channel
circular microphone array with a diameter of 20 cm was used, of
which two microphones with a spacing of d = 8 cm are selected
for the two-channel recognition task which is evaluated here.
First, we evaluate the word error rate (WER) obtained from
the GMM-based recognizer with MFCC features, which is used
to obtain the alignment. For the DNN-based recognizer, we compare logmelspec features extracted from the noisy signals, and
Evaluation Set
Room 3
near
far
11.05
20.69
8.65
14.62
8.32
14.57
8.24
12.88
8.17
13.87
Avg
11.98
9.54
9.41
8.50
8.97
RealData
Room 1
near
far
31.17
30.15
28.45
29.14
28.46
29.07
27.82
26.27
27.34
27.99
Development Set
SimData RealData
Avg
30.66
28.80
28.77
27.05
27.67
Avg
12.14
9.68
9.13
7.92
8.68
Avg
31.61
24.93
25.29
24.19
24.73
enhanced logmelspec features. In both cases, the feature vector is
extended by first- (∆) and second-order (∆∆) derivatives. Then,
we evaluate the combination of noisy logmelspec features with
spatial meldiffuseness or melmsc features; in this case, only firstorder derivatives (∆) are computed for the logmelspec features,
in order to keep the overall dimension of the feature vectors the
same (3NMel ).
Table 1 shows the WER results for the REVERB challenge
evaluation test set, and the average WER for the development
test set. As expected, the DNN-based acoustic model achieves a
lower WER than the GMM-based model. The diffuseness-based
signal enhancement has a negligible effect on WER. This seems
to contradict [15], where the same signal enhancement method
led to a significantly lower WER, however, there, acoustic models were trained on clean speech. Apparently the effect of the
multichannel spectral subtraction for signal enhancement is compensated by noisy multi-condition training. Using the combined
noisy logmelspec and diffuseness features as input to the neural
network however yields a significantly reduced WER. This confirms that the spatial information extracted from the coherence
can be exploited more successfully by the DNN than by speech
enhancement using spectral subtraction, even though, in this case,
the frequency resolution of the meldiffuseness features is reduced
compared to the diffuseness estimate used for spectral subtraction. The melmsc feature also leads to a reduced WER compared
to noisy logmelspec features, although the improvement is smaller
than with meldiffuseness features.
6. CONCLUSION
It has been shown that spatial information extracted from multiple microphones does not necessarily have to be exploited in a
signal enhancement front-end, but may be used more effectively
as an additional feature input for a DNN-based speech recognizer.
The proposed approach has a number of properties which make it
highly suitable for practical applications like cloud-based speech
recognition for smartphones. First, the diffuseness feature is normalized with respect to the microphone array geometry, and can
therefore be used for speech recognition with features extracted
from a variety of multichannel recording devices without requiring adaptation of the acoustic model. Second, the feature can
be computed in real-time (as opposed to batch processing) and
“blindly” in the sense that knowledge or estimation of the direction of arrival is not required. Finally, the evaluation shows that
consistent improvements in recognition accuracy can be achieved.
7. REFERENCES
[1] G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. Dahl, A.-R. Mohamed,
N. Jaitly, A. Senior, V. Vanhoucke, P. Nguyen, T. Sainath,
and B. Kingsbury, “Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 82–97, Nov. 2012.
[2] L. Deng, J. Li, J.-T. Huang, K. Yao, D. Yu, F. Seide,
M. Seltzer, G. Zweig, X. He, J. Williams, and others, “Recent advances in deep learning for speech research at Microsoft,” in Proc. ICASSP, Vancouver, Canada, 2013, pp.
8604–8608.
[3] M. Seltzer, D. Yu, and Y. Wang, “An investigation of deep
neural networks for noise robust speech recognition,” in
Proc. ICASSP, Vancouver, Canada, 2013, pp. 7398–7402.
[4] F. Weninger, S. Watanabe, J. Le Roux, J. R. Hershey,
Y. Tachioka, J. Geiger, B. Schuller, and G. Rigoll, “The
MERL/MELCO/TUM system for the REVERB challenge
using deep recurrent neural network feature enhancement,”
in Proc. REVERB Workshop, Florence, Italy, 2014.
[5] M. Delcroix, T. Yoshioka, A. Ogawa, Y. Kubo, M. Fujimoto,
N. Ito, K. Kinoshita, M. Espi, T. Hori, and T. Nakatani,
“Linear prediction-based dereverberation with advanced
speech enhancement and recognition technologies for the
REVERB challenge,” in Proc. REVERB Workshop, Florence, Italy, 2014.
[6] R. Maas, A. Schwarz, Y. Zheng, K. Reindl, S. Meier,
A. Sehr, and W. Kellermann, “A two-channel acoustic frontend for robust automatic speech recognition in noisy and
reverberant environments,” in Proc. International Workshop on Machine Listening in Multisource Environments
(CHiME), Florence, Italy, 2011, pp. 41–46.
[7] A. Schwarz and W. Kellermann, “Coherent-to-diffuse power
ratio estimation for dereverberation,” IEEE/ACM Trans. on
Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 2015, under review, preprint available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03784.
[8] R. F. Astudillo, D. Kolossa, A. Abad, S. Zeiler, R. Saeidi,
P. Mowlaee, J. P. da Silva Neto, and R. Martin, “Integration
of beamforming and uncertainty-of-observation techniques
for robust ASR in multi-source environments,” Computer
Speech & Language, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 837–850, May 2013.
[9] A. Narayanan and D. Wang, “Joint noise adaptive training
for robust automatic speech recognition,” in Proc. ICASSP,
Florence, Italy, 2014, pp. 2504–2508.
[10] P. Swietojanski, A. Ghoshal, and S. Renals, “Hybrid acoustic models for distant and multichannel large vocabulary
speech recognition,” in Proc. ASRU, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 2013, pp. 285–290.
[11] Y. Liu, P. Zhang, and T. Hain, “Using neural network frontends on far field multiple microphones based speech recognition,” in Proc. ICASSP, Florence, Italy, 2014, pp. 5542–
5546.
[12] L. Danilenko, “Binaurales Hören im nichtstationären diffusen Schallfeld,” Kybernetik, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 50–57, June
1969.
[13] J. F. Culling, B. A. Edmonds, and K. I. Hodder, “Speech
perception from monaural and binaural information,” The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 119, no.
1, pp. 559–565, 2006.
[14] K. Kinoshita, M. Delcroix, T. Yoshioka, T. Nakatani,
A. Sehr, W. Kellermann, and R. Maas, “The REVERB challenge: A common evaluation framework for dereverberation
and recognition of reverberant speech,” in Proc. WASPAA,
New Paltz, NY, USA, 2013, pp. 1–4.
[15] A. Schwarz and W. Kellermann, “Unbiased coherentto-diffuse ratio estimation for dereverberation,” in Proc.
IWAENC, Antibes - Juan Les Pins, France, 2014, pp. 6–10.
[16] G. Del Galdo, M. Taseska, O. Thiergart, J. Ahonen, and
V. Pulkki, “The diffuse sound field in energetic analysis,”
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 131,
no. 3, pp. 2141–2151, Mar. 2012.
[17] D. P. Jarrett, O. Thiergart, E. A. P. Habets, and P. A. Naylor, “Coherence-based diffuseness estimation in the spherical harmonic domain,” in Proc. IEEEI, Eilat, Israel, 2012,
pp. 1–5.
[18] O. Thiergart, T. Ascherl, and E. A. P. Habets, “Power-based
signal-to-diffuse ratio estimation using noisy directional microphones,” in Proc. ICASSP, Florence, Italy, 2014, pp.
7440–7444.
[19] J. F. Culling and H. S. Colburn, “Binaural sluggishness in
the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise,” The
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 107, no.
1, pp. 517–527, Jan. 2000.
[20] D. Povey, A. Ghoshal, G. Boulianne, L. Burget, O. Glembek, N. Goel, M. Hannemann, P. Motlicek, Y. Qian,
P. Schwarz, and others, “The Kaldi speech recognition
toolkit,” in Proc. ASRU, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 2011.
[21] S. P. Rath, D. Povey, K. Vesely, and J. Cernocky, “Improved
feature processing for deep neural networks,” in Proc. Interspeech, Lyon, France, 2013, pp. 109–113.
[22] T. Robinson, J. Fransen, D. Pye, J. Foote, S. Renals,
P. Woodland, and S. Young, “WSJCAM0 Cambridge
read news for REVERB LDC2013E109,” Web Download.
Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, 2013.
[23] M. Delcroix, Y. Kubo, T. Nakatani, and A. Nakamura, “Is
speech enhancement pre-processing still relevant when using deep neural networks for acoustic modeling?,” in Proc.
Interspeech, Lyon, France, 2013, pp. 2992–2996.
[24] X. Zhang, J. Trmal, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “Improving deep neural network acoustic models using generalized
maxout networks,” in Proc. ICASSP, 2014, pp. 215–219.
| 9cs.NE
|
Multiparameter spectral analysis for aeroelastic
instability problems
Arion Pons1,* and Stefanie Gutschmidt2
1
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
2
Key words
AMS classification
multiparameter eigenvalue problems; instability; aeroelasticity.
97M50; 65F15; 15A18; 15A69
This paper presents a novel application of multiparameter spectral theory to the study of
structural stability, with particular emphasis on aeroelastic flutter. Methods of multiparameter
analysis allow the development of new solution algorithms for aeroelastic flutter problems;
most significantly, a direct solver for polynomial problems of arbitrary order and size,
something which has not before been achieved. Two major variants of this direct solver are
presented, and their computational characteristics are compared. Both are effective for
smaller problems arising in reduced-order modelling and preliminary design optimization.
Extensions and improvements to this new conceptual framework and solution method are
then discussed.
1. Introduction
Predicting and controlling aeroelastic instability forms a major part of the discipline of
aeroelasticity. Many different physical systems show flutter instability, and many models
exist to describe them. In a linear system, or the linearization of a nonlinear system, the onset
of flutter or divergence can be formulated in the well-known stability criterion:
Im(𝜒) > 0 for stability
(1)
where 𝜒 are the time-eigenvalues of the system according to the Fourier transform 𝑞(𝑡) =
𝑞̂𝑒 𝜄𝜒𝑡 for the system coordinate 𝑞 [1]. These eigenvalues may be nondimensionalised. Flutter
occurs when the system parameters are such that the system is on the stability boundary,
Im(𝜒f ) = 0. The flutter point may then be described as a tuple which includes the set of
system parameters (particularly, an airspeed parameter) and the modal frequency of
instability, 𝜒f . Typically only one or two flutter or divergence points are of industrial
relevance.
Eq. 1 is not however the only criterion that can be used to characterize instability. This leads
us into the study of aeroelastic methods. Apart from the four established methods – the pmethod, classical flutter analysis, the k-method (or U-g method, or V-g method) and the p-k
method; all of which are detailed and discussed in a number of reference works [1–3] – recent
years have seen a proliferation of new aeroelastic methods. Several authors have refined the
existing established methods for particular scenarios or applications [4–6]. The application of
concepts from robust control theory have yielded a series of methods, including the 𝜇-method
by Lind and Brenner [7,8], the 𝜇-k method by Borglund [9–12], and others [13–15]. The
prime advantage of these 𝜇-type methods is that they facilitate the propagation of uncertainty
*
Corresponding author, [email protected], tel. +44 755 366 3296
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
distributions through the system, allowing a worst-case flutter speed estimate to be made in a
system with high uncertainty. Other developments have come from other fields: Afolabi
[16,17] characterized coupled-mode flutter as a loss of eigenvector orthogonality, using
methods from catastrophe theory. Irani and Sazesh [18] used stochastic methods, while Gu et
al. [19] devised a genetic algorithm, and a number of authors [20–23] have applied neural
networks to the detection of flutter points.
It is in the context of these developments that we propose our method of analyzing flutter
problems. The central methodological contribution of this paper is the concept that the
solution of an aeroelastic system for its flutter points is nothing other than a multiparameter
eigenvalue problem. We will show the simple link between the aeroelastic stability problem
and multiparameter spectral theory, and how this allows for direct solution of a variety of
flutter problems. The purpose of this paper is to detail this link and to explore the
mechanisms by which this direct solution may be accomplished. For this purpose we will
apply our analysis to simple example problems – however, the method does extend to
problems that are significantly more complex; these are considered in Pons and Gutschmidt
[24, 25].
2. Aeroelastic flutter as a multiparameter eigenvalue problem (MEP)
Consider a linear finite-dimensional system with eigenvector 𝐱 ∈ ℂ𝑛 and arbitrary continuous
dependence on both an eigenvalue parameter 𝜒 ∈ ℂ, and another structural or environmental
parameter 𝑝 ∈ ℝ:
(2)
A(𝜒, 𝑝)𝐱 = 𝟎
𝑛×𝑛
where A ∈ ℂ . Any complex structural parameter can of course be split into two real
parameters. The stability problem for this system (with respect to parameter 𝑝) is to find 𝑝
such that an eigenvalue of the problem (𝜒) has zero imaginary part. This point is the ‘stability
boundary’: for a system with multiple structural parameters, the stability boundary may be a
line or other higher-dimensional surface. We then note that the condition Im(𝜒) = 0 is
equivalent to modifying the original definition of the problem such that 𝜒 ∈ ℝ and not 𝜒 ∈ ℂ.
Such a manoeuvre does not seem to be immediately useful: under 𝜒 ∈ ℝ, a solution to Eq. 2
only exists on the stability boundary, and nowhere else. In order to develop, for example,
iterative methods for flutter point calculation, we need to be able to define some form of
solution in the subcritical and supercritical areas (above and below the stability boundary,
respectively). There is an easy way of doing this. Following [26], we take the complex
conjugate of Eq. 2 as another equation:
A(𝜒, 𝑝)𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅ (𝜒, 𝑝)𝐱̅ = 𝟎.
A
(3)
As 𝑝 ∈ ℝ and 𝜒 ∈ ℝ are unaffected by the conjugation, this operation enforces these
conditions. This procedure has been utilized before in the analysis of delay differential
equations [26], and (in a limited form) in the context of Hopf bifurcation prediction [27], but
has never been applied to aeroelastic or other structural stability problems. Equation 3 is
nothing other than a multiparameter eigenvalue problem (MEP): an eigenvalue problem in
which the eigenvalue point is not simply defined by a scalar and an eigenvector, but by an 𝑛tuple and an eigenvector. A number of methods of analysis have been developed for such
problems, and in this paper we will explore some of these. However, as the methods that are
available depend strongly on the structure of matrix A, we will first define a system to work
with.
Page 2 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
3. An Example Section model
3.1. Formulation
Consider first the simple section model shown in Figure 1. This model has two degrees of
freedom: plunge ℎ and twist 𝜃. The governing equations for this model are easy to derive;
they are:
𝑚ℎ̈ + 𝑑ℎ ℎ̇ + 𝑘ℎ ℎ − 𝑚𝑥𝜃 𝜃̈ = −𝐿(𝑡),
𝐼𝑃 𝜃̈ + 𝑑𝜃 𝜃̇ + 𝑘𝜃 𝜃 − 𝑚𝑥𝜃 ℎ̈ = 𝑀(𝑡),
(4)
where 𝑚 and 𝐼𝑃 are the section mass and polar moment of inertia, 𝑘ℎ and 𝑘𝜃 are the section
plunge and twist stiffnesses, 𝑑ℎ and 𝑑𝜃 are the section plunge and twist damping coefficients,
and 𝑥𝜃 is the section’s static imbalance – defined as the distance along the 𝑥-axis from the
pivot point to the centre of mass. Taking the Fourier transform, [ℎ(𝑡), 𝜃(𝑡)] = [ℎ̂, 𝜃̂]𝑒 𝜄𝜒𝑡 , of
this model, we obtain:
(−𝑚𝜒 2 + 𝜄𝑑ℎ 𝜒 + 𝑘ℎ )ℎ̂ + 𝑚𝑥𝜃 𝜒 2 𝜃̂ = 𝐿(𝜒, ℎ̂, 𝜃̂),
𝑚𝑥𝜃 𝜒 2 ℎ̂ + (−𝐼𝑃 𝜒 2 + 𝜄𝑑𝜃 𝜒 + 𝑘𝜃 )𝜃̂ = 𝑀(𝜒, ℎ̂, 𝜃̂).
(5)
To model the aerodynamic loads in the frequency domain we use Theodorsen’s unsteady
aerodynamic theory [3]:
𝐿 = −𝜒 2 (𝐿ℎ ℎ̂ + 𝐿𝜃 𝜃̂), 𝑀 = 𝜒 2 (𝑀ℎ ℎ̂ + 𝑀𝜃 𝜃̂ ).
(6)
The aerodynamic coefficients {𝐿ℎ , 𝐿𝜃 , 𝑀ℎ , 𝑀𝜃 } are complex functions of 𝜅 – the reduced
frequency; an aerodynamic parameter related to the airspeed (𝑈) by 𝜅 = 𝑏𝜒⁄𝑈. Other
structural and environmental parameters involved are the air density (𝜌), the semichord (𝑏)
and the distance along the 𝑥-axis from the midchord to the pivot point, as a fraction of the
semichord (𝑎). See Pons [24] or Hodges and Pierce [3] for details. We assume that the flow
over the airfoil is quasisteady: that is, that Theodorsen’s function takes a value of 1
universally [1,3]. We will deal with general Theodorsen aerodynamics in a later paper, as this
requires iterative or approximate multiparameter solution methods which we will not cover
here. We also assume without loss of generality a lift-angle of attack coefficient of 𝐶𝐿𝛼 = 2𝜋,
as per thin-airfoil theory [28].
It is then customary to nondimensionalise Eq. 5. Further details of this are given in Pons [24].
The final result is a flutter problem of the form
1
1
((M0 + G0 + G1 + G2 2 ) 𝜒 2 − D0 𝜒 − K 0 ) 𝐱 = 𝟎.
𝜅
𝜅
(7)
with dimensionless parameters defined as in Table 1 and the nomenclature, and the matrix
coefficients
𝑎
1 1
G0 = [𝑎 (1 + 𝑎2 )],
𝜇
8
(8)
1
−2𝜄
2𝜄(1 − 𝑎)
G1 = [
],
𝜇 −𝜄(1 + 2𝑎) 𝜄𝑎(1 − 2𝑎)
Page 3 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
Table 1: Dimensionless parameter values for
the section model
Parameter
Value
mass ratio – 𝜇
20
radius of gyration – 𝑟
0.4899
0.5642 rad/s
bending nat. freq. – 𝜔ℎ
1.4105 rad/s
torsional nat. freq. – 𝜔𝜃
bending damping – 𝜁ℎ
1.4105 %
torsional damping – 𝜁𝜃
2.3508 %
−0.1
static imbalance – 𝑟𝜃
pivot point location – 𝑎
−0.2
Figure 1: Diagram of section model
G2 =
1 0
[
𝜇 0
2𝜄𝜁ℎ 𝜔ℎ
D0 = [
0
2
],
1 + 2𝑎
M0 = [
0
],
2
2𝜄𝑟 𝜁𝜃 𝜔𝜃
1
−𝑟𝜃
𝜔2
K0 = [ ℎ
0
−𝑟𝜃
],
𝑟2
0
2 2 ],
𝑟 𝜔𝜃
(8)
Note that this nondimensionalisation is a convenience and not necessary prerequisite for
using multiparameter solution methods. However something that will be of great use is to
rearrange Eq. 7 into two polynomial forms by defining new eigenvalue parameters: Υ = 𝑈⁄𝑏,
𝜏 = 1⁄𝜅 , and 𝜆 = 1⁄𝜒. These two forms are then
((M0 + G0 )𝜒 2 + G1 Υ𝜒 + G2 Υ 2 − D0 𝜒 − K 0 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
(9)
which we term the Υ-𝜒 form, and
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝜏 2 − D0 𝜆 − K 0 𝜆2 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
(10)
which we term the 𝜏-𝜆 form. Both are preferable to the 𝑘-𝜒 form, Eq. 7. We should note at
this point that, although we have here derived these two forms for a small 2-DOF section
model, these forms arise in many other models; often with significantly larger matrices. The
solution methods we develop for this form will thus be applicable to a wide variety of
problems.
3.2. Undamped system
In many aeroelastic systems structural damping is negligible, in which case D0 = 0. While
this may seem to be a trivial case of the preceeding systems, the omission of the structural
damping term does allow us to change the structure of the system, leading to a faster
computation time (as we will show later). In the case of Eq. 10, we have
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝜏 2 − K 0 Λ)𝐱 = 𝟎,
(11)
where Λ = 𝜆2. This system is now linear in Λ, whereas it was previously quadratic in 𝜆. Note
that the 𝜏-𝜒 form is the only polynomial form presented which allows us to make one
parameter linear in this situation.
Page 4 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
3.3. Transformation into MEPs
The three polynomial systems that we have introduced in this section (Eq. 9, 10 and 11) are
not yet fully constrained MEPs, as they only consist of one equation. To constrain the system
we employ the method introduced in Section 2 – the addition of an equation representing the
conjugate of the initial equation. We obtain:
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝜏 2 − K 0 Λ)𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 ) + G
̅1 𝜏 + G
̅2 𝜏 2 − K
̅0 + G
̅ 0 Λ)𝐱̅ = 𝟎,
((M
(12)
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝜏 2 − D0 𝜆 − K 0 𝜆2 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 ) + G
̅1 𝜏 + G
̅2 𝜏 2 − D
̅0 + G
̅0𝜆 − K
̅ 0 𝜆2 )𝐱̅ = 𝟎,
((M
(13)
((M0 + G0 )𝜒 2 + G1 Υ𝜒 + G2 Υ 2 − D0 𝜒 − K 0 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 )𝜒 2 + G
̅1 Υ𝜒 + G
̅2 Υ 2 − D
̅0 + G
̅0𝜒 − K
̅ 0 )𝐱̅ = 𝟎.
((M
(14)
and
These systems are all polynomial multiparameter eigenvalue problems [29]. A number of
solution methods are known for such systems.
4. Direct solution via linearization
4.1. Linearization
Any polynomial MEP can be made into a linear one (consisting of a zeroth-order term and
first-order terms in each eigenvalue) via the process of linearization [30]. This process bears
resemblance to the linearization of single-parameter polynomial eigenvalue problems; a
process which is well-known [31]. Multiparameter linearization is relevant because a number
of direct solution methods exist for linear MEPs. Consider first Eq. 12. This equation
contains only one quadratic variable (𝜏), as Λ is already linear. To linearize this system, we
define a new eigenvector which contains a factor of 𝜏: 𝐪 = [𝐱; 𝜏𝐱]. By expanding the
system’s coefficient matrices and using this factor of 𝜏 in the eigenvector to reduce the order
of the quadratic term, we obtain a linear problem of double the size:
M0 + G0
0
̅0
̅
M +G
([ 0
0
([
0
−K
]+[ 0
−𝐼𝑛
0
̅
0
] + [−K 0
−𝐼𝑛
0
G
0
]Λ + [ 1
𝐼𝑛
0
̅
0] Λ + [G1
𝐼𝑛
0
G2
] 𝜏) 𝐪 = 𝟎
0
̅2
G
̅=𝟎
] 𝜏) 𝐪
0
(15)
The upper rows of Eq. 15 represents Eq. 12 directly, and the lower row represents the identity
𝐼𝑛 (𝜏𝐱) = 𝜏𝐼𝑛 𝐱. Note that other linearizations of similar form are possible. However,
irrespective of the exact linearization used, the resulting system will be of the form:
(A + BΛ + C𝜏)𝐪 = 𝟎,
̅+B
̅Λ + C̅𝜏)𝐪
(A
̅ = 𝟎.
(16)
Note that it is not actually necessary to linearize the second (i.e. conjugate) equation of the
aeroelastic system, because the linearized conjugate equation will be the conjugate of the
linearized first equation. This is a property of this method of linearization.
This same linearization process can be applied to any quadratic MEP. Any problem of the
form
(A + B𝜆 + C𝜏 + D𝜆𝜏 + E𝜆2 + F𝜏 2 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
(17)
Page 5 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
can be linearized as
A B
([ 0 −𝐼𝑛
0
0
C
0
0 ] + [𝐼𝑛
−𝐼𝑛
0
0 0
+[0 0
𝐼𝑛 0
D E
0 0] 𝜆
0 0
F
𝐱
0] 𝜏) [𝜆𝐱] = 𝟎.
0
𝜏𝐱
(18)
We have
A = M0 + G0
D = −K 0
(19)
B = G1
E=0
C = −D0
F = G2
for Eq. 13, and changing 𝜆 → 𝜒 and 𝜏 → Υ,
A = −K 0
D = M0 + G0
(20)
B = −D0
E = G1
C=0
F = G2
for Eq. 14. These linearised systems have matrix coefficients triple the size of the original
problem.
4.2. Direct solution
Consider Eq. 16. Post-multiplying the first equation in this system by C̅𝐲 and premultiplying
the second by C𝐱, we have
(A + BΛ + C𝜏)𝐱 ⊗ (C̅𝐲) = 0,
(21)
̅+B
̅Λ + C̅𝜏)𝐲 = 0.
(C𝐱) ⊗ (A
These two equations are both equal to zero so we may equate them. After cancelling the
terms in 𝜏, the expression can be manipulated into:
(22)
Δ1 𝐳 = ΛΔ0 𝐳
and an enlarged eigenvector 𝐳 = 𝐱 ⊗ 𝐲 and the operator determinants
̅
Δ0 = B ⊗ C̅ − C ⊗ B
̅
Δ1 = C ⊗ A − A ⊗ C̅
̅.
̅−B⊗A
Δ2 = A ⊗ B
(23)
Eq. 22 is a generalized eigenvalue problem (GEP), in the single parameter 𝜆. Solvers for the
generalized eigenvalue problem are very widely available. If the linear system has square
coefficients of size 𝑚 then the operator determinants are of size 𝑚2 .
The operator determinants can also be used to define a second GEP in 𝜏. By multiplying the
̅𝐲 and B𝐱 respectively, we can also show that:
first and second equations of Eq. 16 by B
(24)
Δ2 𝐳 = 𝜏Δ0 𝐳.
However, it is only necessary to solve one of Eq. 22 or Eq. 24: once one has been solved,
then its solutions can be substituted back into the original polynomial system, which yields
another smaller GEP. Alternatively, if the eigenvalue is simple then it may be computed more
cheaper via Rayleigh quotients in 𝐳 or (decomposing 𝐳 = 𝐱 ⊗ 𝐲), 𝐱 and 𝐲. The system is thus
completely solved for its flutter points. This direct solution method is known in mathematical
literature as the operator determinant method. Its computational complexity is 𝒪(𝑛6 ),
irrespective of whether 𝑛 is the size of the linear coefficients (A, B, etc.) or the polynomial
coefficients (M0 , G0 , etc.) [30,32,33]. This large complexity arises from solving the
generalized eigenvalue problem, an 𝒪(𝑚3 ) process by the QZ algorithm [34], with operator
Page 6 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
determinants of size 𝑚 = 𝒪(𝑛2 ). The operator determinant method has not previously been
used in aeroelasticity, and has only rarely seen engineering application in the study of
dynamic model updating [35,36].
4.3. Singularity
One important caveat of the operator determinant approach is that the matrix Δ0 must not be
singular. If it is, then the eigenvalues of the original polynomial system (e.g. Eq. 12-14) will
not generally coincide with those of the GEPs of the linearized problem (Eq. 22 and 24)
[30,37,38]. A linear MEP with singular Δ0 is said to be singular MEP. A large proportion of
the linear flutter problems that arise in the study of aircraft aeroelasticity are singular. This is
largely because the linearization of polynomial problems tends to generate singular linear
problems, even if the original polynomial problem has all its matrix coefficients at full rank –
compare Eq. 18. Some smaller linearizations are not necessarily singular: for example Eq. 15.
However, here we find that (for our aerodynamic model) the coefficient matrix G2 is not full
rank and so the linearized problem is singular anyway. In many circumstances we will be
dealing with a singular problem, and for a long time the lack of a working solver for such
singular problems has been a major obstacle to the application of multiparameter methods to
real-world problems.
However, recently a solution has been proposed. Muhič and Plestenjak [29] proved that the
eigenvalues of a polynomial system are equivalent to the finite regular eigenvalues of the pair
of singular operator determinant GEPs constructed via linearization. The finite regular
eigenvalues of a linear two-parameter system are the pairs (𝜆, 𝜇) such that
𝑖 ∈ {1,2} [37]:
rank(A𝑖 + B𝑖 𝜆 + C𝑖 𝜇) < max 2 rank(A𝑖 + B𝑖 𝑠 + C𝑖 𝑡),
(𝑠,𝑡)∈ℂ
(25)
that is, the finite regular eigenvalues are the set of points that cause the singular problem to
have its maximum rank, even though this is not full rank. On the basis of this proof, Muhič
and Plestenjak [29] devised a set of algorithms which would extract the common regular part
of the singular matrix pencils (i.e. matrix-valued functions polynomial in a variable 𝜆)
Δ1s − 𝜆Δ0s and Δ2s − 𝜆Δ0s . This common regular part is represented by two smaller
nonsingular matrix pencils (Δ1 − 𝜆Δ0 and Δ2 − 𝜆Δ0 ), the eigenvalues of which are the finite
regular eigenvalues of the singular problem and thus the eigenvalues of the polynomial
problem. In practical terms, this can be seen as a compression of the singular operator
determinant matrices into smaller full-rank matrices. The operator determinant method, as
presented in Section 4.2, can be applied to these compressed pencils. The algorithms involved
in the extraction of the common regular part are presented in [29] and published also in
MATLAB code [39]. We will not detail them here as they are complex.
5. Direct solution via Quasi-linearization
5.1. Quasi-linearization
Hochstenbach et al. [30] recently presented another method of linearization for polynomial
MEPs. Instead of increasing the size of the coefficient matrices, this method of linearization
increases the number of parameters and equations in the system. To differentiate it from strict
linearization, Hochstenbach et al. [30] term this new method quasi-linearization. The process
is as follows. Considering again Eq. 12, we define a new eigenvalue parameter 𝛼 = 𝜏 2 . The
equations then become
Page 7 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝛼 − K 0 Λ)𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 ) + G
̅1 𝜏 + G
̅2 𝛼 − K
̅0 + G
̅ 0 Λ)𝐱̅ = 𝟎.
((M
(26)
This is now a linear three-parameter eigenvalue problem, but with only two equations. We
need a third equation to constrain the system. We have the relation 𝛼 − 𝜏 2 = 0, but this is
nonlinear. However, noticing that we can write this relation as
𝛼 𝜏
(27)
det ([
]) = 0
𝜏 1
we can recast it as a new MEP to add to Eq. 26 (using an arbitrary eigenvector 𝐲):
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝛼 − K 0 Λ)𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 ) + G
̅1 𝜏 + G
̅2 𝛼 − K
̅0 + G
̅ 0 Λ)𝐱̅ = 𝟎,
((M
0 0
0 1
1 0
([
]+[
]𝜏 + [
] 𝛼) 𝐲 = 𝟎.
0 1
1 0
0 0
(28)
In a similar way, we can linearize Eq. 13 with the definitions 𝛼 = 𝜏 2 and 𝛽 = 𝜆2 :
((M0 + G0 ) + G1 𝜏 + G2 𝛼 − D0 𝜆 − K 0 𝛽)𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 ) + G
̅1 𝜏 + G
̅2 𝛼 − D
̅0 + G
̅ 0𝜆 − K
̅ 0 𝛽)𝐱̅ = 𝟎,
((M
0 0
0 1
1 0
([
]+[
]𝜏 +[
] 𝛼) 𝐲𝟏 = 𝟎,
0 1
1 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 0
([
]+[
]𝜆 + [
] 𝛽) 𝐲𝟐 = 𝟎,
0 1
1 0
0 0
(29)
and Eq. 14 with the definitions 𝛼 = 𝜒 2 , 𝛽 = Υ 2 , 𝛾 = Υ𝜒:
((M0 + G0 )𝛼 + G2 𝛽 + G1 𝛾 − D0 𝜒 − K 0 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
̅0 )𝛼 + G
̅2𝛽 + G
̅1 𝛾 − D
̅0 + G
̅0𝜒 − K
̅ 0 )𝐱 = 𝟎,
((M
1 0
0 1
0 0
([
]𝛼 + [
]𝜒 +[
]) 𝐲𝟏 = 𝟎,
0 0
1 0
0 1
0 1
0 0
1 0
([
]𝛼 + [
]𝛽 + [
] 𝛾) 𝐲𝟐 = 𝟎,
0 0
1 0
0 1
(30)
These systems can be solved via the operator determinant method, in a more general form
than that presented in Section 4.2.
5.2. The general operator determinant method
The general form of a nonhomogeneous MEP is
𝑁
𝑊𝑖 (𝜼) = A𝑖0 𝐱 𝑖 + ∑ 𝜂𝑗 A𝑖𝑗 𝐱 𝑖 ,
𝑖 = 1, … , 𝑛
(31)
𝑗=1
where 𝜼 is the vector of eigenvalues (𝜂𝑗 being the individual eigenvalues), A𝑖𝑗 are the
coefficient matrices, which can be complex and of different sizes for each equation, and 𝐱 𝑖
are the eigenvectors. Eq. 31 can be visualized as a non-square array of matrices:
A10
A20
[
⋮
A𝑁0
A11
A21
⋮
A𝑁1
A12
A22
⋮
A𝑁2
⋯ A1𝑁
⋯ A2𝑁
].
⋱
⋮
⋯ A𝑁𝑁
Page 8 of 20
(32)
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
In a process analogous to that presented in Section 4.4, we can construct a series of operator
determinants for this system. There are 𝑁 + 1 such operator determinants (Δ0 through to Δ𝑁 ),
of size 𝑛𝑁 for constant coefficient size 𝑛. They correspond to taking determinants of Eq. 32,
with certain columns removed or inserted, and with the normal scalar multiplication
operation replaced by a Kronecker product between matrices. Definitions and derivations of
these determinants may be found in [40–44], and one software implementation in [39]. In the
two-parameter case this analysis collapses into that of Section 4.2.
These general operator determinants allow us to compute the eigenvalues of the Eq. 31 via
generalized eigenvalue problems. Providing Δ0 is nonsingular, it holds that
Δ𝑖 𝐱 = 𝜂𝑖 Δ0 𝐱.
(33)
In this way we are able to solve the quasi-linearized systems given in Section 5.1 (we will
discuss singularity in Section 5.4). However, note that already by using this quasilinearization process we have made the operator determinants smaller than they were with
standard linearization. Using Eq. 12, the operator determinants are square and of size 2𝑛2 ,
and using Eq. 13 or 14 they are of size 4𝑛2 . With standard linearization they are of size 4𝑛2
and 9𝑛2 , respectively.
5.3. Computing operator determinants
In the two-parameter case, the computation of the operator determinants is trivial. However
in the case of larger systems we must find some other approach. In the general case, the
operator determinants may be computed by modifying the Leibniz formula for the
determinant [40]:
𝑁
Δ(M) = ∑ sgn(𝐬) ⊗ M𝑖,𝐬𝑖 ,
𝐬 ∈ 𝑆𝑁
𝑖=1
(34)
where 𝑆𝑁 is the set of permutations of the set {1, … , 𝑁}, sgn(𝐬) is the sign of the permutation
vector 𝐬 ∈ 𝑆𝑁 . M is the square matrix array (a modification of Eq. 32) corresponding to the
operator determinant desired. The notation ⊗𝑁
𝑖 denotes the repeated application of the
Kronecker product. Note that the tensor determinant definition in [40] is slightly erroneous as
the factor (−1)sgn(𝜎) in their tensor determinant expressions should be either sgn(𝜎) or
(−1)𝑁(𝜎) , where 𝑁(𝜎) is the number of inversions in 𝜎. Alternatively, Muhič and Plestenjak
[39] devised an operator determinant Laplace expansion [45] that is able to compute the
operator determinants of a system of arbitrary size, via a process of recursion:
𝑁
Δ(M) = ∑(−1)𝑖+1 M𝑖1 ⊗ 𝑚𝑖1 ,
(35)
𝑖=1
where 𝑚𝑖1 denotes the minor entry corresponding to M𝑖1 . The summation in Eq. 35 follows
the first column of M, though, of course, many other summation paths could be used. It
should be noted that the use of the Laplace or Leibniz methods for computing the determinant
of an ordinary matrix have very high non-polynomial computational complexity costs –
𝒪(𝑛!) and 𝒪(𝑛! 𝑛), respectively [46,47].
5.4. Singularity
One major advantage of the direct solver based on quasi-linearization is that it generates
linearized problems that are not always singular – when the coefficient matrices are of full
rank, Eq. 28-30 are in general nonsingular. However in our case the coefficient G2 is singular,
and so it happens that all these three equations are singular anyway. The theory of the
Page 9 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
compression process noted in Section 4.3 has never been extended to the general
multiparameter case, and so we have no rigorous method of solving singular MEPs with
𝑁 > 2. However, we do have a practical method of doing so. Numerical experiments (some
of which are detailed in Section 6) indicate that, although the compression algorithm takes
only Δ0 , Δ1 and Δ2 as an input, it will successfully compress these three operator
determinants for the general multiparameter problem (ignoring all the others). In the case of
Eq. 28-30, with these three operator determinants we can solve for all the eigenvalue
parameters of the system, irrespective of the order in which we arrange the eigenvalues.
We should note that there is no justification for this procedure other than the experimental
evidence that the algorithm works – evidence confirmed also by the nonrigourous 𝑁 > 2
compression process utilized in [39]. The common regular part relationship proved by [29]
applies only to two-parameter eigenvalue problems arising from linearization, and indeed it is
not clear how the concept of the common regular part would extend to an 𝑁 > 2 problem
with more than two pencils. That the two-parameter algorithm does work for the first three
operator determinants of an 𝑁 > 2 problem implies that the algorithm will generalize – it is a
question of working out what this generalization is. This is an interesting area for further
research. For the purposes of this paper, however, we will use the compression algorithm for
the quasi-linearized Δ0 , Δ1 and Δ2 without proof.
6. Numerical experiments
6.1. Undamped model
We are now in a position to compute the flutter points of the models we introduced in Section
3. We have devised two direct solvers to do so: a direct solver with linearization and a direct
solver with quasi-linearization. Consider first the undamped section model (Eq. 12), with
parameter values as per Table 1. To validate our direct solution methods, we first produce a
modal damping plot (Figure 2). Three points of neutral stability may be observed 𝜏 = ±1.00
and 𝜏 = 0. The point 𝜏𝐹 = 1.00 is the only physical flutter point. We can link the modal
damping curve for this flutter point with the lower modal frequency path in the Re(𝜒) plot
(this requires data not observed directly on Figure 2). We thus can estimate that 𝜒𝐹 =
1.32 rad/s (Λ 𝐹 = 0.57s2 /rad2 ). The point at 𝜏 = −1.00 along the same mode corresponds to a
nonphysical flutter event occurring at negative airspeed. Finally, at 𝜏 = 0 both modes have
neutral stability (at 𝜒 = 0.548 rad/s and 𝜒 = 1.426 rad/s or Λ = 3.33 s2 /rad2 and Λ =
0.492s2 /rad2 ). This, however, merely represents the fact that the structure is undamped at
zero airspeed due to the lack of any structural damping in the model. The divergence point of
this system does not appear on this plot, as it occurs at infinite 𝜏 and Λ. However, the
computation of divergence points does not require multiparameter methods anyway, as if the
frequency 𝜒 is assumed to be zero in the governing equation (e.g. Eq. 9) then the problem
becomes a single parameter eigenvalue problem in the airspeed parameter (e.g. Υ). This
problem can then be solved with single-parameter solvers.
We then compute the flutter points of the system via our two direct solution methods,
yielding flutter points identical to those detailed above for the presented accuracy. With the
solver based on linearization, the uncompressed operator determinants are of size 16 and the
compressed ones of size 4. With the solver based on quasi-linearization the size of the
uncompressed determinants can be reduced significantly – down to 8 – while producing
compressed determinants of the same size. The quasi-linearization method thus reduces the
time required for the compression process, as the finite-regular part extraction algorithm
Page 10 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
works by successively increasing the rank of the system (not all at once). However, for this
problem the computation time is too small for any meaningful assessment: we will
investigate computation time more fully in Section 6.3. Figure 3 shows the system flutter
points superimposed on a contour plot [24]. As can be seen, there is an exact agreement
between the direct solutions and the contour plot solutions (the intersections of Re(𝑑) = 0
and Im(𝑑) = 0).
Figure 2: Modal damping plot for the undamped section model.
Figure 3: Contour plot for the undamped section model, showing identical solutions from the two direct solvers.
Page 11 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
6.2. Damped model
We now simulate the damped system, in both forms (Eq. 13 and 14). Figure 4 shows a
contour plot for the 𝜏-𝜆 form of this system (Eq. 16), with direct solutions from both solution
methods. There is a single physical flutter point at 𝜏𝐹 = 1.650, 𝜆𝐹 = 0.8336 s/rad, and a
nonphysical flutter point at a small negative 𝜏. The divergence point occurs at infinite 𝜏 and
𝜆. As expected, the solutions from both direct solution methods are identical to each other
and the solutions from the contour plot. Figure 5 shows a contour plot of the Υ-𝜒 form (Eq.
14) with direct solutions from both solution methods. This physical flutter point can be
located at Υ𝐹 = 1.98 Hz, 𝜒𝐹 = 1.20 rad/s and the divergence point at Υ𝐷 = 3.99 Hz. Again,
the flutter points computed with direct solvers agree exactly with those seen on the contour
plot, and the results from the system as a whole agree with those of the 𝜏-𝜆 form (𝜆𝐹 =
1⁄𝜒𝐹 = 0.83 s/rad and 𝜏𝐹 = Υ𝐹 ⁄𝜆𝐹 = 1.65).
6.3. Computation time
Given the high computational complexity of these direct solution methods – 𝒪(𝑛6 ) – we are
interested in the maximum system size for which a direct solution is practical. We have
already found that for 𝑛 = 2 the computational effort required is tiny, and so at the very least
these direct solvers are useful for small reduced-order models as might be used in a
preliminary design analysis. This alone is of use, as the directness of these solvers makes
them ideal for use in optimization routines or other applications in which a large number of
computations must be performed with limited user guidance. To gain a better understanding
of the computational complexity characteristics of our methods, we simulate a series of
systems of increasing matrix coefficient size. We generate random complex-valued matrices
for the polynomial coefficients (M0 , G0 , etc.), of size 𝑛 = 2𝑘 with 𝑘 ∈ {1, 2, … , 5}. For
robustness, we average the results for 𝑘 = 1 over 50 random matrices, for 𝑘 = 2 over 10
random matrices, for 𝑘 = 3 over 5 random matrices; and for systems larger than this we
generate only one matrix. Figure 6 shows the wall-clock solution time against system size for
the direct solver with linearization, for a 64-bit Intel i7-4770 with 3.4 GHz processor and 16
GB RAM, running MATLAB R2014b. Note that the 𝜆 solution time denotes the time
required to compute the 𝜆 components of the solution via a series of one-parameter
eigenvalue problems. As can be seen, the compression process is the most expensive
component of the algorithm, making up a constant fraction of about 65% of the total
computation time over the entire range of 𝑛. The GEP solution time is initially completely
negligible but becomes more significant as system size increases: by 𝑛 = 32 it makes up 34%
of the total computation time. The 𝜆-solution and setup process are never of much
significance.
We expect from computational complexity theory that the gradient of the GEP-solution time
curve in log-log units will be approximately 6.0 (Section 4.2). Fitting a linear curve through
this data yields a gradient of 5.46, with an 𝑅 2 of 0.994. However, the GEP solution-time
curve is slightly concave, with a maximum gradient of 6.47. The algorithm can then be said
to have complexity 𝒪(𝑛6 ) overall. Figure 7 shows the wall-clock solution time against
system size for the direct solver with quasi-linearization. This simulation was run on the same
Intel i7-4770 platform with MATLAB R2014b. The random coefficient matrices used are
identical to those in Figure 6.And although now the quasi-linearized system in no longer
singular, we still apply the compression algorithm to capture some of its overhead costs.. As
can be seen, these costs are not large but are still more significant than the GEP and 𝜆
solution times for some system sizes.
Page 12 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
Figure 4: Contour plot for the damped section model (𝜏-𝜆 form), showing identical solutions from the two direct
solvers.
Figure 5: Contour plot for the damped section model (Υ-𝜒 form), showing identical solutions from the two
direct solvers.
Page 13 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
Figure 6: Wall-clock solution time against system size for the direct solver with linearization.
Figure 7: Wall-clock solution time against system size for the direct solver with quasi-linearization.
Page 14 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
These GEP and 𝜆 solution times are effectively identical to those of the direct solver with
linearization, as the algorithm is solving a GEP of exactly the same size, yielding exactly the
same eigenvalues. However, the most striking aspect of Figure 7 is the fact that the setup time
occupies the majority of the required computation time right up to 𝑛 = 16 (after which it is
surpassed by the GEP solution time). The setup process involved using defining the system
array (Eq. 32) in a cell array, and computing the necessary operator determinants of this array
(Δ0 and Δ2 ) using the modified Leibniz formula (Eq. 34). On investigating these two
procedures we find that it is the computation of the Kronecker products within the operator
determinant which occupies the greatest time. However, despite this, the actual computational
complexity of the algorithm as a whole is lower than that of the direct solver with
linearization. GEP solution time is still approximately 𝒪(𝑛6 ), though the concavity that was
noted in Figure 6 is still present.
Finally, Figure 8 shows a comparison of the total computation times for the two algorithms.
As can be seen, below a system coefficient size of approximately 10, linearisation is faster
than quasi-linearisation (at 𝑛 = 2, over an order of magnitude faster). Above this coefficient
size, quasi-linearisation is faster (at 𝑛 = 32, twice as fast). To keep computation times below
10s, the system size must be below 11; to keep it below 1s, 8, and below 0.1s, 5. As it stands,
the operator determinant method is not suitable for use with finite-element models or any
other systems with a large number of degrees of freedom. It is, however, useful for the
solution of simple reduced order models, e.g. in a preliminary design optimization.
Figure 8: Total wall-clock solution time against system size for the two direct solver variants.
Page 15 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
7. Discussion
7.1. Alternative solution methods
We have so far discussed the operator determinant method – a solution method which is
direct but computationally expensive. However, two other classes of method are also
available. The Sylvester-Arnoldi type methods are a set of closely-related algorithms that are
only valid for two-parameter problems, but are fast and can handle large systems [48]. They
still use operator determinants to reformulate the system into a set of generalized eigenvalue
problems, but instead of solving this set of GEPs directly, the solution procedure is optimized
based on the given knowledge that the operator determinants consist of a difference of two
Kronecker products. For example, each step of a Krylov subspace procedure solution
procedure for the GEP reduces to the solution of a Sylvester equation. Several related
algorithms may be devised this way, and in some cases the computational complexity of the
solution process can be reduced all the way down to 𝒪(𝑛3 ) [48]. However, this technique
shows little potential for generalization to 𝑁-parameter systems, as it relies on being able to
reformulate the operator determinant GEP into a simple and well-known matrix equation. As
the operator determinant definition becomes more complex, the resulting matrix equation
changes and efficient solvers may not be available. There is also no easy extension for
singular problems.
Subspace methods for one-parameter eigenvalue problems are based around generating a
series of linear spaces that eventually approximate one of the system’s eigenspaces (the linear
space of eigenvectors corresponding to a given eigenvalue). The Jacobi-Davidson and
Rayleigh-Ritz methods are well-known one-parameter subspace methods, which can be
generalized to apply to two-parameter systems [26,32,49–51], though this is not without
difficulties [49]. These methods do not invoke the operator determinants, and show potential
for generalization both to 𝑁-parameter and to polynomial systems. The Jacobi-Davidson is
applicable to singular systems and has previously been tested on singular linearized
aeroelastic stability problems [25]; but its performance was observed to be poorer than the
operator determinant method. However the solution of singular MEPs has only been achieved
very recently (2010 [29]), and so it is likely that the next few years will bring significant
developments in this area.
7.2. Extensions to the concept
The core methodology presented in this paper can be extended to a wide variety of problems.
Not only more complex two-parameter flutter models – considered in Pons [24] and Pons and
Gutschmidt [25] – but also stability problems from a wide variety of fields, including
systems with entirely different eigenvalue definitions. Indeed, any combination of model
parameters in a stability model can indeed be treated as multiparameter eigenvalues; and
scalar constraints on these parameters can cast as eigenvalue problems by introducing a scalar
eigenvector [24]. For example, in aeroelastic model, given the location of a flutter point, we
could solve for the sets of parameter values that could generate such a flutter point – allowing
us to perform model identification based on flutter point information. This could pave the
way for a least-squares approach for overconstrained multiparameter systems. Alternatively,
we could introduce a flight altitude / air density / Mach number parameter and compute
points on the aeroelastic flutter envelope of the aircraft. The multiparameter formulation
provides a versatile way of analysing stability problems in any combination of parameters.
Page 16 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
8. Conclusion
In this paper we have demonstrated and discussed the use of multiparameter solution
techniques for the solution of aeroelastic and related stability problems. We have introduced
the link between multiparameter spectral theory and stability analysis, and we showed how
this link can be used to reformulate stability problems with a complex-valued stability metric
and a pertinent environmental parameter into a two-parameter eigenvalue problem. We
demonstrated that this allows the direct solution of stability problems that are linear or
polynomial in these parameters, and we discussed aspects of the solution process, including
the linearization and quasi-linearization of polynomial problems, general N-parameter
problems, computational costs and approaches to problem singularity. We discuss extensions
to these methods, including the generalization to more complex problems; and further
applications, including parameter identification and flight envelope computation. The
application of multiparameter methods to stability problems – in aeroelasticity and in other
disciplines – has the potential to provide a wide variety of new methods for stability analysis.
References
[1]
R. L. BISPLINGHOFF, H. ASHLEY, R. L. HALFMAN. Aeroelasticity. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1957.
[2]
H. J. HASSIG. An approximate true damping solution of the flutter equation by determinant iteration.
Journal of Aircraft 1971; 8(11): 885–889. DOI: 10.2514/3.44311.
[3]
D. H. HODGES, G. A. PIERCE. Introduction to Structural Dynamics and Aeroelasticity. 2nd ed. Cambridge
University Press: New York, 2011.
[4]
H. HADDADPOUR, R. D. FIROUZ-ABADI. True damping and frequency prediction for aeroelastic systems:
The PP method. Journal of Fluids and Structures 2009; 25(7): 1177–1188. DOI:
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.06.006.
[5]
A. NAMINI, P. ALBRECHT, H. BOSCH. Finite element-based flutter analysis of cable-suspended bridges.
Journal of Structural Engineering 1992; 118(6): 1509–1526. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)07339445(1992)118:6(1509).
[6]
P. C. CHEN. Damping perturbation method for flutter solution: the g-method. AIAA Journal 2000; 38(9):
1519–1524. DOI: 10.2514/2.1171.
[7]
R. LIND, M. BRENNER. Robust aeroservoelastic stability analysis. Springer-Verlag: London, 1999.
[8]
R. LIND. Match-Point Solutions for Robust Flutter Analysis. Journal of Aircraft 2002; 39(1): 91–99. DOI:
10.2514/2.2900.
[9]
D. BORGLUND. Robust aeroelastic stability analysis considering frequency-domain aerodynamic
uncertainty. Journal of Aircraft 2003; 40(1): 189–193. DOI: 10.2514/2.3074.
[10] D. BORGLUND. The μ-k method for robust flutter solutions. Journal of Aircraft 2004; 41(5): 1209–1216.
DOI: 10.2514/1.3062.
[11] D. BORGLUND. Upper Bound Flutter Speed Estimation Using the μ-k Method. Journal of Aircraft 2005;
42(2): 555–557.
[12] D. BORGLUND, U. RINGERTZ. Efficient computation of robust flutter boundaries using the μ-k method.
Journal of Aircraft 2006; 43(6): 1763–1769.
[13] Y. GU, Z. YANG, W. WANG, W. XIA. Dynamic Pressure Perturbation Method for Flutter Solution: the MuOmega Method. In Proceedings of the 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural
Page 17 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Palm
Springs, CA, 2009. DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-2312.
[14] Y. GU, Z. YANG. Generalized Mu-Omega Method with Complex Perturbation to Dynamic Pressure. In
Proceedings of the 51st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials
Conference, Orlando, FL, 2010. DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-2799.
[15] D. BORGLUND. Robust Aeroelastic Analysis in the Laplace Domain: The µ-p Method. In Proceedings of
the 2007 International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD), Stockholm, Sweden,
2007.
[16] D. AFOLABI. Flutter analysis using transversality theory. Acta mechanica 1994; 103(1–4): 1–15. DOI:
10.1007/BF01180214.
[17] D. AFOLABI, R. M. V. PIDAPARTI, H. T. Y. YANG. Flutter Prediction Using an Eigenvector Orientation
Approach. AIAA Journal 1998; 36(1): 69–74. DOI: 10.2514/2.353.
[18] S. IRANI, S. SAZESH. A new flutter speed analysis method using stochastic approach. Journal of Fluids
and Structures 2013; 40: 105–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2013.03.018.
[19] Y GU, X. ZHANG, Z. YANG. Robust flutter analysis based on genetic algorithm. Science China
Technological Sciences 2012; 55(9): 2474–2481.
[20] P. W. BLYTHE, I. H. HERSZBERG. The Solution of Flutter Equations Using Neural Networks. In 5th
Australian Aeronautical Conference: Preprints of Papers, Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1993; 415.
[21] C. H. CHEN. Determination of flutter derivatives via a neural network approach. Journal of Sound and
Vibration 2003; 263(4): 797–813. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01279-8.
[22] C. H. CHEN, J. C. WU, J. H. CHEN. Prediction of flutter derivatives by artificial neural networks. Journal of
Wind
Engineering
and
Industrial
Aerodynamics
2008;
96(10):
1925–1937.
DOI:
10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.044.
[23] A. NATARAJAN, “Aeroelasticity of morphing wings using neural networks,” Doctoral Dissertation,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA, 2002.
[24] A PONS, “Aeroelastic flutter as a multiparameter eigenvalue problem,” Master’s Thesis, University of
Canterbury, New Zealand, 2015.
[25] A PONS AND S GUTSCHMIDT. Multiparameter Solution Methods for Semi-Structured Aeroelastic Flutter
Problems. AIAA Journal, article in advance, 2017. DOI: 10.2514/1.J055447.
[26] K. MEERBERGEN, C. SCHRÖDER, H. VOSS. A Jacobi-Davidson method for two-real-parameter nonlinear
eigenvalue problems arising from delay-differential equations. Numerical Linear Algebra with
Applications 2013; 20(5): 852–868. DOI: 10.1002/nla.1848.
[27] K. MEERBERGEN, A. SPENCE. Inverse Iteration for Purely Imaginary Eigenvalues with Application to the
Detection of Hopf Bifurcations in Large-Scale Problems. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and
Applications 2010; 31(4): 1982–1999. DOI: 10.1137/080742890.
[28] F. M. WHITE. Fluid mechanics. 6th ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, 2009.
[29] A. MUHIČ, B. PLESTENJAK. On the quadratic two-parameter eigenvalue problem and its linearization.
Linear Algebra and its Applications 2010; 432(10): 2529–2542. DOI: 10.1016/j.laa.2009.12.022.
[30] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, A. MUHIČ, B. PLESTENJAK. On linearizations of the quadratic two-parameter
eigenvalue problem. Linear Algebra and its Applications 2012; 436(8): 2725–2743. DOI:
10.1016/j.laa.2011.07.026.
Page 18 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
[31] F. TISSEUR, K. MEERBERGEN. The Quadratic Eigenvalue Problem. SIAM Review 2001; 43(2): 235–286.
DOI: 10.1137/S0036144500381988.
[32] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, B. PLESTENJAK. A Jacobi-Davidson Type Method for a Right Definite TwoParameter Eigenvalue Problem. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 2002; 24(2): 392–
410. DOI: 10.1137/S0895479801395264.
[33] B. PLESTENJAK. A continuation method for a weakly elliptic two-parameter eigenvalue problem. IMA
Journal of Numerical Analysis 2001; 21(1): 199–216. DOI: 10.1093/imanum/21.1.199.
[34] A. QUARTERONI, R. SACCO, F. SALERI. Numerical mathematics. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin: Berlin,
Germany, 2007.
[35] N. COTTIN. Dynamic model updating – a multiparameter eigenvalue problem. Mechanical Systems and
Signal Processing 2001; 15(4): 649–665. DOI: 10.1006/mssp.2000.1362.
[36] N. COTTIN, J. REETZ. Accuracy of multiparameter eigenvalues used for dynamic model updating with
measured natural frequencies only. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 2006; 20(1): 65–77. DOI:
10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.10.005.
[37] A. MUHIČ, B. PLESTENJAK. On the singular two-parameter eigenvalue problem. Electronic Journal of
Linear Algebra 2009; 18: 420–437.
[38] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, B. PLESTENJAK. Backward error, condition numbers, and pseudospectra for the
multiparameter eigenvalue problem. Linear Algebra and its Applications 2003; 375: 63–81. DOI:
10.1016/S0024-3795(03)00613-X.
[39] B. PLESTENJAK, A. MUHIČ. MultiParEig 1.0. MATLAB File Exchange: Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2015.
[40] T. KOŠIR. Finite-dimensional multiparameter spectral theory: the nonderogatory case. Linear Algebra and
its Applications 1994; 212–213: 45–70. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(94)90396-4.
[41] B. BINDING, P. J. BROWNE. Two parameter eigenvalue problems for matrices. Linear Algebra and its
Applications 1989; 113: 139–157. DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(89)90293-0.
[42] F. V. ATKINSON. Multiparameter spectral theory. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 1968;
74(1): 1–28. DOI: 10.1090/S0002-9904-1968-11866-X.
[43] F. V. ATKINSON. Multiparameter Eigenvalue Problems: Matrices and Compact Operators. Academic
Press: London, 1972.
[44] B. P. RYNNE. Multiparameter spectral theory and Taylor’s joint spectrum in Hilbert space. Proceedings of
the Edinburgh Mathematical Society 1988; 31(01): 127. DOI: 10.1017/S0013091500006635.
[45] H. ANTON. Elementary Linear Algebra. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons: New York, New York State, USA,
1977.
[46] H. A. EISELT, C. L. SANDBLOM. Linear Programming and its Applications. Springer-Verlag: Berlin,
Germany, 2007.
[47] L. N. TREFETHEN, D. BAU. Numerical linear algebra. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics:
Philadelphia, PA, 1997.
[48] K. MEERBERGEN, B. PLESTENJAK. A Sylvester-Arnoldi type method for the generalized eigenvalue
problem with two-by-two operator determinants. Department of Computer Science, Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven: Leuven, Belgium, 2014.
[49] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, T. KOSIR, B. PLESTENJAK. A Jacobi-Davidson Type Method for the TwoParameter Eigenvalue Problem. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 2004; 26(2): 477–
497. DOI: 10.1137/S0895479802418318.
Page 19 of 20
Multiparameter analysis for instability problems
[50] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, B. PLESTENJAK. Harmonic Rayleigh–Ritz extraction for the multiparameter
eigenvalue problem. Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis 2008; 29: 81–96.
[51] M. E. HOCHSTENBACH, A. MUHIČ, B. PLESTENJAK. Jacobi–Davidson methods for polynomial twoparameter eigenvalue problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 2015; 288: 251–263.
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2015.04.019.
Page 20 of 20
| 5cs.CE
|
Cluster Synchronization of Coupled Systems with
Nonidentical Linear Dynamics
Zhongchang Liu∗ and Wing Shing Wong
arXiv:1502.07481v2 [cs.SY] 30 Dec 2015
Abstract
This paper considers the cluster synchronization problem of generic linear dynamical systems
whose system models are distinct in different clusters. These nonidentical linear models render
control design and coupling conditions highly correlated if static couplings are used for all individual
systems. In this paper, a dynamic coupling structure, which incorporates a global weighting factor
and a vanishing auxiliary control variable, is proposed for each agent and is shown to be a feasible
solution. Lower bounds on the global and local weighting factors are derived under the condition
that every interaction subgraph associated with each cluster admits a directed spanning tree. The
spanning tree requirement is further shown to be a necessary condition when the clusters connect
acyclicly with each other. Simulations for two applications, cluster heading alignment of nonidentical
ships and cluster phase synchronization of nonidentical harmonic oscillators, illustrate essential parts
of the derived theoretical results.
Index Terms
Cluster synchronization; Coupled linear systems; Nonidentical systems; Graph topology
I. I NTRODUCTION
Understanding the interaction of coupled individual systems continues to receive interest
in the engineering research community [1]. Recently, more attention has been paid to cluster
synchronization problems which have much wide applications, such as segregation into small
subgroups for a robotic team [2] or physical particles [3], predicting opinion dynamics in
social networks [4], and cluster phase synchronization of coupled oscillators [5], [6].
In the models reported in most of the literature, the clustering pattern is predefined and
fixed; research focuses are on deriving conditions that can enforce cluster synchronization for
This work is supported by the Hong Kong RGC Earmarked Grant CUHK 14208314. The authors are with Department
of Information Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
∗
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected].
various system models [7]–[17]. Preliminary studies in [7]–[10] reported algebraic conditions
on the interaction graph for coupled agents with simple integrator dynamics. Subsequently,
a cluster-spanning tree condition is used to achieve intra-cluster synchronization for firstorder integrators (discrete time [11] or continuous time [12]), while inter-cluster separations
are realized by using nonidentical feed-forward input terms. For more complicated system
models, e.g., nonlinear systems ([13]–[15]) and generic linear systems ([16], [17]), both
control designs and inter-agent coupling conditions are responsible for the occurrence of
cluster synchronization. For coupled nonlinear systems, e.g., chaotic oscillators, algebraic
and graph topological clustering conditions are derived for either identical models ([13]) or
nonidentical models ([14], [15]) under the key assumption that the input matrix of all systems
is identical and it can stabilize the system dynamics of all individual agents via linear state
feedback (i.e., the so-called QUAD condition). For identical generic linear systems which
are partial-state coupled [16], [17], a stabilizing control gain matrix solved from a Ricatti
inequality is utilized by all agents, and agents are pinned with some additional agents so that
the interaction subgraph of each cluster contains a directed spanning tree.
The system models introduced above can describe a rich class of applications for multiagent systems. A common characteristic is that the uncoupled system dynamics of all the
agents can be stabilized by linear state feedback attenuated by a unique matrix (i.e., static state
feedback). This simplification allows the derivation of coupling conditions to be independent
of the control design of any agent, and thus offers scalability to a static coupling strategy. This
kind of benefit still exists for nonidentical nonlinear systems which are full-state coupled, as
all the system dynamics can be constrained by a common Lipchitz constant (Lipchitz can
imply the QUAD condition [18]). However, for the class of partial-state coupled nonidentical
linear systems, the stabilizing matrices for distinct linear system models are usually different.
Then the coupling conditions under static couplings will be correlated with the control designs
of all individual systems. This correlation not only harms the scalability of a coupling strategy
but also increases the difficulty in specifying a graph topological condition on the interaction
graph.
The goal of this paper is to achieve state cluster synchronization for partial-state coupled
nonidentical linear systems, where agents with the same uncoupled dynamics are supposed to
synchronize together. This is a problem of practical interest, for instance, maintaining different
formation clusters for different types of interconnected vehicles, providing different synchronization frequencies for different groups of clocks using coupled nonidentical harmonic oscil-
lators, reaching different consensus values for people with different opinion dynamics, and so
on. In order to relieve the difficulties in using the conventional static couplings, couplings with
a dynamic structure is proposed by introducing a vanishing auxiliary variable which facilitates
interactions among agents. With the proposed dynamic couplings, an algebraic necessary and
sufficient condition, which is independent of the control design, is derived. This newly derived
algebraic condition subsumes those published for integrator systems in [7]–[10] as special
cases. Due to the entanglement between nonidentical system matrices and the parameters
from the interaction graph, the algebraic condition is not straightforward to check. Thus, a
graph topological interpretation of the algebraic condition is provided under the assumption
that the interaction subgraph associated with each cluster contain a directed spanning tree.
We also derive lower bounds for the local coupling strengths in different clusters, which
are independent of the control design due to the dynamic coupling structure. This spanning
tree condition is further shown to be a necessary condition when the clusters and the intercluster links form an acyclic structure. This conclusion reveals the indispensability of direct
links among agents belonging to the same cluster, and further strengthens the sufficiency
statement presented initially in [16]. Another contribution of the proposed dynamic couplings
in comparison to those static couplings in [17] is that the lower bound of a global factor
which weights the whole interaction graph is also independent of the control design. For
this reason, the least exponential convergence rate of cluster synchronization is characterized
more explicitly than that in [17]. The derived results in this paper are illustrated by simulation
examples for two applications: cluster heading alignment of nonidentical ships and cluster
phase synchronization of nonidentical harmonic oscillators.
The organization of this paper is as follows: Following this section, the problem formulation
is presented in Section II. In Section III, both algebraic and graph topological conditions
for cluster synchronization are developed. Simulation examples are provided in Section IV.
Concluding remarks and discussions for potential future investigations follow in Section V.
II. P ROBLEM S TATEMENT
Consider a multi-agent system consisting of L agents, indexed by I = {1, . . . , L}, and
S
N ≤ L clusters. Let C = {C1 , . . . , CN } be a nontrivial partition of I, that is, N
i=1 Ci = I,
Ci 6= ∅, and Ci ∩ Cj = ∅, ∀i 6= j. We call each Ci a cluster. Two agents, l and k in I, belong
to the same cluster Ci if l ∈ Ci and k ∈ Ci . Agents in the same cluster are described by the
same linear dynamic equation:
ẋl (t) = Ai xl (t) + Bi ul (t), l ∈ Ci , i = 1, . . . , N
(1)
where xl (t) ∈ Rn with initial value, xl (0), is the state of agent l and ul (t) ∈ Rmi is the
control input; Ai ∈ Rn×n and Bi ∈ Rn×mi are constant system matrices which are distinct
for different clusters.
A. Interaction graph topology and graph partitions
A directed interaction graph G = (V, E, A) is associated with system (1) such that each
agent l is regarded as a node, vl ∈ V, and a link from agent k to agent l corresponds to a
directed edge (vk , vl ) ∈ E. An agent k is said to be a neighbor of l if and only if (vk , vl ) ∈ E.
The adjacency matrix A = [alk ] ∈ RL×L has entries defined by: alk 6= 0 if (vk , vl ) ∈ E,
and alk = 0 otherwise. In addition, all = 0 to avoid self-links. Note that alk < 0 means that
the influence from agent k to agent l is repulsive, while links with alk > 0 are cooperative.
P
Define L = [blk ] ∈ RL×L as the Laplacian of G, where bll = Lk=1 alk and blk = −alk for
any k 6= l.
Corresponding to the partition C = {C1 , . . . , CN }, a subgraph Gi , i = 1, . . . , N , of G
contains all the nodes with indexes in Ci , and the edges connecting these nodes. See Fig. 1 for
illustration. Without loss of generality, we assume that each cluster Ci , i = 1, . . . , N , consists
P
of li ≥ 1 agents ( N
i=1 li = L), such that C1 = {1, . . . , l1 }, . . ., Ci = {σi + 1, . . . , σi + li },
Pi−1
. . ., CN = {σN + 1, . . . , σN + lN } where σ1 = 0 and σi = j=1
lj , 2 ≤ i ≤ N . Then, the
Laplacian L of the graph G can be partitioned
L11 L12
L
21 L22
L= .
..
..
.
LN 1 LN 2
into the following form:
· · · L1N
· · · L2N
,
..
...
.
· · · LN N
(2)
where each Lii ∈ Rli ×li specifies intra-cluster couplings and each Lij ∈ Rli ×lj with i 6= j,
specifies inter-cluster influences from cluster Cj to Ci , i, j = 1, · · · , N . Note that Lii is not
the Laplacian of Gi in general.
Construct a new graph by collapsing any subgraph of G, Gi , into a single node and define
a directed edge from node i to node j if and only if there exists a directed edge in G from
a node in Gi to a node in Gj . We say G admits an acyclic partition with respect to C, if
G¹1
G1
1
2
01
1
3
4
02
3
4
G¹2
G2
Fig. 1.
2
A graph topology partitioned into two subgraphs.
the newly constructed graph does not contain any cyclic components.
If the latter holds, by
4
1
2
relabeling the clusters and the nodes in G, we can represent the Laplacian L in a lower
-a
triangular form
1
a
-1
1
L
0
11
..
.
.
L= .
.
,
3
-1
LN 1 · · · LN N
-1
(3)
4
so that each cluster Ci receives no input from clusters Cj if j > i. In Fig. 1, the two subgraphs
-1
1
G1 and G2 illustrate an acyclic partition of the whole
graph.
-1
1
1
c1
B. The cluster synchronization problem
1
5
3
-1
c1
c2
The main task in this paper is to achieve cluster synchronization for the states of systems
2
6
-1
1
4
in (1) via distributed couplings through the control inputs ul (t) which is defined as follows:
for l ∈ Ci , i = 1, . . . , N
ul (t) = Ki ηl (t)
"
1 X
η̇l (t) = (Ai + Bi Ki )ηl + c ci
c1
c1
2
3
alk (ηk − ηl + xl − xk )
-1
(4a)
4
1
k∈Ci
+
X
alk (ηk − ηl +1xl −-1xk ) ,
1
-1
(4b)
k∈C
/ i
1
n
c
c
3
where Ki is the control gain matrix to be specified;
the7 vector3 ηl (t)8 ∈ R , l ∈ I is an5
6
-1
auxiliary control variable with initial value, ηl (0); c > 0 is the global weighting factor for
the whole interaction graph G; each ci > 0 is a local weighting factor used to adjust the
intra-cluster coupling strength of cluster Ci . Note that the couplings in (4) takes a dynamic
structure. The reasons why conventional static couplings (e.g., those in [13]–[17]) are not
c2
preferred will be explained in details in the main part.
The cluster synchronization problem is defined below.
Definition 1: A linear multi-agent system in (1) with couplings in (4) is said to achieve
N -cluster synchronization with respect to the partition C if the following holds: for any xl (0)
and ηl (0), l ∈ I, limt→∞ kxl (t) − xk (t)k = 0 ∀k, l ∈ Ci , i = 1, . . . , N , limt→∞ ηl (t) =
0 ∀l ∈ I, and for any set of xl (0), l ∈ I there exists a set of ηl (0), l ∈ I such that
lim supt→∞ kxl (t) − xk (t)k > 0 ∀l ∈ Ci , ∀k ∈ Cj , ∀i 6= j.
In the definition, all auxiliary variables, ηl (t), l ∈ I are required to decay to zero so as
to guarantee that the control effort of every agent is essentially of finite duration. For state
separations among distinct clusters, one should not expect them to happen for any set of
xl (0)’s and ηl (0)’s; an obvious counterexample is that all system states will stay at zero
when xl (0) = ηl (0) = 0 for all l ∈ I. Some assumptions throughout the paper are in order.
Assumption 1: Each of the pairs (Ai , Bi ), i = 1, . . . , N is stabilizable.
Assumption 2: Each Ai has at least one eigenvalue on the closed right half plane.
This assumption excludes trivial scenarios where all system states synchronize to zero.
To deal with stable Ai ’s, one may introduce distinct feed-forward terms in ul (t) as studied
in [11], [12]. In order to segregate the system states according to the uncoupled system
dynamics in (1), an additional mild assumption is made on the system matrices Ai ’s, namely,
they can produce distinct trajectories. Rigorously, for any i 6= j, the solutions xi (t) and xj (t)
to the linear differential equations ẋi (t) = Ai xi (t) and ẋj (t) = Aj xj (t), respectively satisfy
lim supt→∞ kxi (t) − xj (t)k > 0 for almost all initial states xi (0) and xj (0) in the Euclidean
space Rn .
Assumption 3: Every block Lij of L defined in (2) has zero row sums, i.e., Lij 1lj = 0.
This assumption guarantees the invariance of the clustering manifold
{x(t) = [xT1 (t), . . . , xTL (t)]T : x1 (t) = · · · = xl1 (t), . . . , xσN +1 (t) = · · · = xL (t)}.
It is imposed frequently in the literature to result in cluster synchronization for various
multi-agent systems (see [7]–[10], [13], [14], [16], [17]). To fulfill it, one can let positive
and negative weights be balanced for all of the links directing from one cluster to any
agent in another cluster. The negative weights for inter-cluster links is supposed to provide
desynchronizing influences. Note also that with Assumption 3 each Lii is the Laplacian of a
subgraph Gi , i = 1, . . . , N .
Notation: 1n = [1, 1, . . . , 1]T ∈ Rn . The identity matrix of dimension n is In ∈ Rn×n .
The symbol blockdiag{M1 , . . . , MN } represents the block diagonal matrix constructed from
the N matrices M1 , . . . , MN . “⊗” stands for the Kronecker product. A symmetric positive
(semi-) definite matrix S is represented by S > 0(S ≥ 0). Reλ(A) is the real part of the
eigenvalue of a square matrix A, and σ(A) is the spectrum of A.
III. C ONDITIONS FOR ACHIEVING C LUSTER S YNCHRONIZATION
In this section, we first present a necessary and sufficient algebraic clustering condition that
entangles parameters from the Laplacian L and the system matrices Ai ’s. Then, we present
some graph topological conditions which offer more intuitive interpretations.
The following discussion makes use
cL
1 11
..
Lc = .
LN 1
of the weighted graph Laplacian
···
L1N
..
...
∈ RL×L ,
.
· · · cN L N N
(5)
and the following matrix:
c L̂
···
1 11
..
...
L̂c = .
L̂N 1 · · ·
L̂1N
..
.
cN L̂N N
∈ R(L−N )×(L−N ) ,
(6)
where each L̂ij , i, j = 1, . . . , N is a block matrix defined as
L̂ij = L̃ij − 1li γijT ,
(7)
with
γij = [bσi +1,σj +2 , · · · , bσi +1,σj +lj ]T ∈ Rlj −1 ,
b
· · · bσi +2,σj +lj
σi +2,σj +2
..
..
.
.
L̃ij =
.
∈ R(li −1)×(lj −1) .
.
.
bσi +li ,σj +2 · · · bσi +li ,σj +lj
The two matrices Lc and L̂c have the following relation, whose proof is shown in Appendix
I.
Lemma 1: Under Assumption 3, each diagonal block Lii in Lc has exactly one zero
eigenvalue if and only if the corresponding matrix L̂ii defined in (7) is nonsingular. Moreover,
Lc defined in (5) has exactly N zero eigenvalues if and only if the matrix L̂c defined in (6)
is nonsingular.
A. Algebraic clustering conditions
Under Assumption 1, for each i = 1, . . . , N there exists a matrix Pi > 0 satisfying the
Riccati equation
Pi Ai + ATi Pi − Pi Bi BiT Pi = −I.
(8)
Choose the control gain matrices as Ki = −BiT Pi , and denote  = blockdiag{Il1 −1 ⊗
A1 , . . . , IlN −1 ⊗ AN }. Then, we have the following algebraic condition to check the cluster
synchronizability.
Theorem 1: Under Assumptions 1 to 3, the multi-agent system in (1) with couplings in
(4) achieves N -cluster synchronization if and only if the matrix  − cL̂c ⊗ In is Hurwitz,
where L̂c is defined in (6).
The proof is given in Appendix II. The matrix  − cL̂c ⊗ In contains parameters from the
interaction graph that entangle intimately with those from the system dynamics. In general,
it is not possible to verify the above synchronization condition by simply comparing the
eigenvalues of L̂ with those of Ai ’s. However, one can do so for a homogeneous multi-agent
system as stated in the following corollary.
Corollary 1: Under Assumptions 1 to 3, and with identical system parameters: Ai = A,
Bi = B, Ki = K, for all i = 1, . . . , N , a multi-agent system in (1) with couplings in (4)
achieves N -cluster synchronization if and only if the following holds:
min Reλ(cL̂c ) > max Reλ(A).
σ(L̂c )
σ(A)
(9)
A sketch of the proof for this corollary is given in Appendix III.
Remark 1: In words, the algebraic condition (9) states that the weighted graph Laplacian
Lc has exactly N zero eigenvalues, and all the nonzero eigenvalues have large enough positive
real parts to dominate the unstable system dynamics described by A. This condition implies
that related results in [7]–[9] are special cases with A = 0, B = 1 and K = 1. It also
includes part of the results in [10], which are obtained for identical double integrators. Note
that with identical system parameters, one can use static controllers without involving the
auxiliary variables ηl ’s. However, in that case the synchronized state in each cluster depends
linearly on the initials states xl (0)’s only. For certain initial state sets, state separations in
the limit cannot be guaranteed.
B. Graph topological conditions
The matrix  − cL̂c ⊗ In in Theorem 1 can be proven to be Hurwitz for certain graph
topologies in conjunction with some lower bounds on the weighting factors. To do so, the
following well-known result for subgraphs will be useful.
Lemma 2 ([19]): Let Gi be a non-negatively weighted subgraph. Then, the Laplacian Lii
of Gi has a simple zero eigenvalue and all the nonzero eigenvalues have positive real parts
if and only if Gi contains a directed spanning tree.
By Lemma 1, there exists a positive definite matrix Ŵi ∈ R(li −1)×(li −1) such that
Ŵi L̂ii + L̂Tii Ŵi > 0, i = 1, . . . , N,
(10)
if the corresponding subgraph Gi satisfies the conditions in Lemma 2. Denote
Ŵ = blockdiag{Ŵ1 , . . . , ŴN },
and let
L̂o = L̂c − L̂d ,
(11)
with L̂d = blockdiag{c1 L̂11 , . . . , cN L̂N N }. The following theorem states the main result of
this subsection.
Theorem 2: Under Assumptions 1 to 3, a multi-agent system in (1) with couplings in (4)
achieves N -cluster synchronization exponentially fast with the least rate of 21 [c − λmax (Â +
ÂT )], if each subgraph, Gi , contains only cooperative edges and has a directed spanning tree,
and the weighting factors satisfy
c>
max λmax (Ai + ATi ),
(12)
i∈{1,...,N }
and for each i = 1, . . . , N
ci ≥
λmax (Ŵ) − λmin (Ŵ L̂o + L̂To Ŵ)
λmin (Ŵi L̂ii + L̂Tii Ŵi )
,
(13)
where each Ŵi satisfies (10).
Proof: Following the proof of the sufficiency part of Theorem 1, we need to show that
the system
ζ̇(t) = (Â − cL̂c ⊗ In )ζ(t)
(14)
is exponentially stable under the conditions in Theorem 2. First, these conditions guarantee
the existence of positive definite matrices, Ŵi ’s, satisfying (10). Hence, (13) can be written
as
ci λmin (Ŵi L̂ii + L̂Tii Ŵi ) + λmin (Ŵ L̂o + L̂To Ŵ) ≥ λmax (Ŵ)
for i = 1, . . . , N . These inequalities together with Weyl’s eigenvalue theorem ([20]) yield
the following:
λmin (Ŵ L̂c + L̂Tc Ŵ)
= λmin (Ŵ L̂d + L̂Td Ŵ + Ŵ L̂o + L̂To Ŵ)
≥ λmin (Ŵ L̂d + L̂Td Ŵ) + λmin (Ŵ L̂o + L̂To Ŵ)
≥ λmax (Ŵ),
which further implies that
Ŵ L̂c + L̂Tc Ŵ ≥ Ŵ.
(15)
Now, consider the Lyapunov function candidate V (t) = ζ(t)T (Ŵ ⊗ In )ζ(t) for the system
(14). Taking time derivative on both sides of V (t), one gets
V̇ (t) = ζ T (t)(Ŵ ⊗ In )(Â − cL̂c ⊗ In )
+ (Â − cL̂c ⊗ In )T (Ŵ ⊗ In )ζ(t)
= ζ T (t)[(Ŵ ⊗ In )(Â + ÂT )
− c(Ŵ L̂c + L̂Tc Ŵ) ⊗ In ]ζ(t)
≤ ζ T (t)[(Ŵ ⊗ In )(Â + ÂT ) − cŴ ⊗ In ]ζ(t)
≤ −[c − λmax (Â + ÂT )]V (t),
where the last inequality follows from (12). This confirms the exponential stability of system
(14), and therefore cluster synchronization can be achieved exponentially fast with the least
rate of 21 [c − λmax (Â + ÂT )].
We have the following comments on the condition in (12):
1) From the above proof, one can find another lower bound for c as follows:
c>
λmax ((Ŵ ⊗ In )(Â + ÂT ))
λmin (Ŵ L̂c + L̂Tc Ŵ)
.
(16)
This bound is tighter than that in (12) since the inequality in (15) and λmax (Ŵi ) >
0, λmax (Ai + ATi ) ≥ 0 for any i imply that the right-hand side (RHS) of (16) ≤
λmax (Ŵ)λmax (Â + ÂT )
= RHS of (12). However, this tighter bound only guarantees
λmax (Ŵ)
that V̇ (t) < 0, and does not provide a lower bound on the convergence rate, which
could be quite slow. Moreover, the RHS of (16) involves all the ci ’s in L̂c , and no
known distributed algorithm is available for the computation.
2) Note that the role of c is more essential in stabilizing the unstable modes of the system
matrices, Ai ’s, than in strengthening the connective ability of the interaction graph.
A global weighting factor similar to c is utilized in a related paper [17] where the
clustering problem for identical linear systems are solved. In that paper, the global
factor serves as a parameter in a Ricatti inequality so as to result in a control gain
matrix. However, using a larger value for that factor does not necessarily increase the
convergence rate. In contrast, the selection of c in this paper is independent of the
control design in (8). And the rate of convergence can be improved definitely by using
a larger value for c.
The following two remarks explain why we prefer the dynamic couplings in (4) than static
couplings when dealing with nonidentical linear systems.
Remark 2: To achieve state cluster synchronization for a group of generic linear systems,
a natural choice of static couplings is the following (slightly modified from couplings of
homogeneous linear systems in [16], [17]): for each l ∈ Ci , i = 1, . . . , N
X
X
ul (t) = Ki ci
blk xk (t) +
blk xk (t)
k∈Ci
(17)
k∈C
/ i
However, following a similar procedure as in [17], one will need the following condition
ci λmin ((Ŵi L̂ii + L̂Tii Ŵi ) ⊗ Pi Bi BiT Pi ) ≥ ρ,
(18)
for every i = 1, . . . , N , where ρ = λmax ((Ŵ ⊗ In )PBBT P) − λmin (PBBT P(ŴLo ⊗ In ) +
(LTo Ŵ ⊗ In )PBBT P). To compute ρ, one needs information on the control design of all
agents, i.e., BT P = blockdiag{Il1 −1 ⊗ B1 P1 , . . . , IlN −1 ⊗ BN PN }. This fact renders the
selection of local weighting factors, ci ’s, a centralized decision. Moreover, (18) cannot be
satisfied by any ci in the nontrivial case that ρ > 0, and Pi Bi BiT Pi is singular for some i.
In contrast to (18), the condition (13) specifies explicitly the requirements for ci ’s, and it is
independent of the design of control gain matrices. In this sense, the dynamic couplings in
(4) are preferable to the static ones in (17).
Remark 3: For nonidentical nonlinear systems of the form, ẋl (t) = fi (xl , t), l ∈ Ci , static
couplings are used to result in closed-loop systems as follows ([14], [15]):
X
X
ẋl (t) = fi (xl , t) − Γ ci
blk xk (t) +
blk xk (t) ,
k∈Ci
k∈C
/ i
where Γ is a constant (usually nonnegative-definite) matrix. It was shown that clustering
conditions involve the graph Laplacian only (see [15]) if all individual self-dynamics are
constrained by the so-called QUAD condition: for any x, y ∈ Rn , (x − y)T [fl (x) − fl (y) −
Γ(x−y)] ≤ −ω(x−y)T (x−y), where ω > 0 is a prescribed positive scalar. For generic linear
systems with static couplings in (17), this QUAD condition requires that for any x ∈ Rn ,
xT (Ai − Γ)x ≤ −ωxT x with Γ = Bi Ki for all i = 1, . . . , N . Given a Γ, for the existence of
control gains Ki ’s, one needs all Bi ’s to satisfy Rank(Bi ) = Rank([Bi Γ]). However, this
rank condition is too restrictive. For example, for the models in (21), an applicable choice of
Γ is I2 , but then Rank(Bi ) < Rank([Bi Γ]) and thus no Ki can be solved from Γ = Bi Ki . In
contrast, the dynamic couplings in (4) do not impose such constraints on the system models.
Generally, it is not always necessary to let every subgraph contain a directed spanning
tree. In fact, agents belonging to a common cluster may not need to have direct connections
at all as long as the algebraic condition in Theorem 1 is satisfied. This point is illustrated
by a simulation example in the next section. Nevertheless, the spanning tree condition turns
out to be necessary under some particular graph topologies as stated by the corollary below.
Corollary 2: Let G be an interaction graph with an acyclic partition as in (3), and let the
edge weights of every subgraph Gi be nonnegative. Under Assumptions 1 to 3, a multi-agent
system (1) with couplings in (4) achieves N -cluster synchronization if and only if every Gi
contains a directed spanning tree, and the weighting factors satisfy
c · ci >
maxσ(Ai ) Reλ(Ai )
minσ(L̂ii ) Reλ(L̂ii )
, ∀i = 1, . . . , N,
(19)
where each L̂ii is defined in (7).
Proof:
By Theorem 1, we can examine the stability of  − cL̂c ⊗ In . Let Ti ∈
R(li −1)×(li −1) , i = 1, . . . , N , be a set of nonsingular matrices such that Ti−1 L̂ii Ti = Ji ,
where Ji is the Jordan form of L̂ii . Denote T = blockdiag{T1 ⊗ In , . . . , TN ⊗ In }. Then, the
3
4
3
02
c1
4
G¹2
G2
1
G1
2
G1
1
1
2
1
2
-1
1
-5
-1
1
5
-1
-4
1
4
-1
1
1
1
3
4
1
4
G2
(b)
(a)
Fig. 2. Interaction graph partitioned into two clusters C1 = {1, 2} and C2 = {3, 4} (a) cyclic partition (b) acyclic partition.
1
3
5
-1
1
1
1
3
G2
c2
-1
4
-1
G1
c1
c2
−1
s1
1
1
2
block triangular matrix T (Â − cL̂c ⊗1 In )T has diagonal blocks Ai − c̃i λk (L̂ii )In , where
6
-1
4
-5 5
c̃i = c ·1 ci , k = 1, . . . , li − 1, i = 1, . . . , N . Hence,
the matrix  − cL̂c ⊗ In is Hurwitz if
1
and only if c̃i mink Reλk (L̂ii ) > maxm Reλ1m (Ai )-1for any i. This claim is equivalent to the
c1
2
3
-1
1
4
3 the first 1claim of Lemma
2
conclusion of4 this corollary due to sLemma
2,
1, and Assumption
1
2 that requires maxm Reλm (Ai ) ≥ 0.
-1
1
G2
c2 reveals the indispensability of direct links among agents in the same cluster
This corollary
under
1 an acyclicly partitioned interaction graph. Note that such direct communication require7
c3
8
5
ments
-1 for intra-cluster agents is not necessary under a nonnegatively weighted interaction
graph (see [11], [12], [15] for references).
Remark 4: It is worth mentioning for the condition in (19) that one can set ci = 1 for all
i, and adjust the global factor c only to result in cluster synchronization. In contrast, without
the acyclic partitioning structure, the local weighting factors ci ’s need to satisfy the lower
bound conditions in (13). Note that (19) specifies the tightest lower bound for c, while a
lower bound reported in [16] for identical linear systems via Lyapunov stability analysis can
be quite loose.
IV. S IMULATION E XAMPLES
In this section, we provide application examples for cluster synchronization of nonidentical
linear systems. We also conduct numerical simulations using these models to illustrate the
derived theoretical results.
A. Example 1: Heading alignment of nonidentical ships
Consider a group of four ships with the interaction graph described by Fig. 2(a), where
ship 1 and 2 (respectively, ship 3 and 4) are of the same type. The purpose is to synchronize
the heading angles for ships of the same type. The steering dynamics of a ship is described
by the well-known Nomoto model [21]:
ψ̇l (t) = vl (t)
1
κi
v̇l (t) = − vl (t) + ul (t)
τi
τi
(20)
where ψl is the heading angle (in degree) of a ship l ∈ I, vl (deg/s) is the yaw rate, and ul
is the output of the actuator (e.g., the rudder angle). The parameter τi is a time constant, and
κi is the actuator gain, both of which are related to the type of a ship. Define for i = 1, 2
the system matrices
0 1
0
, Bi = ,
Ai =
κi
0 − τ1i
τi
(21)
and assume that τ1 = 42.21, τ2 = 107.3, κ1 = 0.181, κ2 = 0.185. The solutions
to the
22.3 233.2
34
580
and P2 =
,
Riccati equations in (8) are given by P1 =
233.2 3915.4
580 16875
which lead to the control gain matrices K1 = −[1 16.79] and K2 = −[1 29.09]. Since
maxi=1,2 λmax (Ai + ATi ) = 0.99, we set c = 1 according to (12).
The weighted graph Laplacian is given by
0
0
5 −5
−c c
1 1 1 −1
Lc =
,
−1 1
0
0
0
0 −c2 c2
c1
4
using the definition in (6). So, L̂11 = 1, L̂22 = 1, and for any
which yields L̂c =
−1 c2
Ŵ1 > 0 and Ŵ2 > 0, the inequalities in (10) hold. We choose Ŵ1 = Ŵ2 = 1. It follows that
λmax (Ŵ) = 1, λmin (Ŵ L̂o + L̂To Ŵ) = −3, and λmin (Ŵi L̂ii + L̂Tii Ŵi ) = 2 for i = 1, 2. Then,
we can choose c1 = c2 = 2 so that the inequalities in (13) are satisfied. Simulation result in
Fig. 3(a) shows that cluster synchronization is achieved for the heading angles (the velocity
vl (t) of every agent will converge to zero as shown in Fig. 3(b)).
Now, let c1 = 0 so that agents 1 and 2 in cluster C1 have no direct connection. Cluster
synchronization is still achieved as shown in Fig. 3(c). This example illustrates that intracluster connections are not necessary for cluster synchronization under a cyclicly partitioned
ψ(t) (deg)
40
20
ψ1
ψ2
ψ3
ψ4
0
−20
−40
0
v1
v2
v3
v4
2
v(t) (deg/s)
60
1
0
−1
−2
100
200
t (sec)
300
0
100
200
t (sec)
300
(a) Under the graph in Fig. 2(a), cluster synchro- (b) Under the graph in Fig. 2(a), the velocity
nization is achieved with c1 = c2 = 2.
vl (t) of every ship converges to zero.
60
ψ(t) (deg)
ψ1
ψ2
ψ3
ψ4
20
0
−20
−40
0
ψ(t) (deg)
50
40
ψ1
ψ2
ψ3
ψ4
0
−50
100
200
t (sec)
300
0
100
200
t (sec)
300
(c) Under the graph in Fig. 2(a), cluster synchro- (d) Under the acyclic partitioning graph in Fig.
nization is achieved with c1 = 0, c2 = 2.
2(b), ψl ’s in the first cluster cannot synchronize
together.
Fig. 3.
Evolutions of ψl (t) and vl (t) for the ship heading steering dynamics in (20) connected with graphs in Fig. 2.
interaction graph. However, under an acyclic partition as in Fig. 2(b), the first cluster of
agents, having no direct connections, cannot achieve state synchronization as shown in Fig.
3(d).
B. Example 2: Cluster synchronization of oscillators
The studied cluster synchronization problem for nonidentical linear systems may find
applications in the coexistence of oscillators with different frequencies. To see this, let us
consider two clusters of coupled harmonic oscillators with graph topology in Fig. 4(a), where
the first cluster contains a sender s1 and two receivers r1 and r2 , the second cluster contains
a sender s2 and two receivers r3 and r4 , and the four receivers are coupled by some directed
links. Assume the angular frequencies of the two clusters of oscillators are w1 = 2 rad/s and
1
3
4
1
3
G2
G2
(b)
(a)
G1
3
s1
1
1
r1
-1
1
4
1
s2
1
r4
1
r3
x1l (t)
-5 5
10
0
−10
0
G2
(a)
c2
s1
r1
r2
s2
r3
r4
20
r2
c1
4
4
π
2π
t (sec)
3π
(b)
Fig. 4. (a) Interaction graph partitioned into two clusters C1 = {s1 , r1 , r2 } and C2 = {s2 , r3 , r4 }. (b) Evolutions of the
first components of the nonidentical harmonic oscillators under the graph in Fig. 4(a).
5
w2 = 2.5 rad/s, respectively. So, the dynamic equation of each oscillator is
ẋ1l (t) = x2l (t),
ẋ2l (t) = −wi2 x1l (t) + ul (t), l ∈ Ci , i = 1, 2
(22)
which corresponds to the following system matrices:
0
1
0
, Bi = , i = 1, 2.
Ai =
−wi2 0
1
The objective is to let the receivers of each cluster follow the state of the sender.
By a similar design procedure as in the previous example, we can set K1 = −[0.1231 1.1163],
K2 = −[0.0554 1.0539], c = 6, and c1 = c2 = 13. Simulation result in Fig. 4(b) shows the
synchronous oscillations of the harmonic oscillators with two distinct angular frequencies.
V. C ONCLUSIONS
This paper investigates the state cluster synchronization problem for multi-agent systems
with nonidentical generic linear dynamics. By using a dynamic structure for coupling strategies, this paper derives both algebraic and graph topological clustering conditions which are
independent of the control designs. For future studies, cluster synchronization which can only
be achieved for the system outputs is a promising topic, especially for linear systems with
parameter uncertainties or for heterogeneous nonlinear systems. For completely heterogenous
linear systems, research works following this line are conducted by the authors in [22]
and others in [23]. For nonlinear heterogeneous systems, the new theory being established
for complete output synchronization problems [24], [25] may be further extended. Another
interesting challenge existing in cluster synchronization problems is to discover other graph
topologies that meet the algebraic conditions.
A PPENDIX I
P ROOF OF L EMMA 1
1
0
∈ Rli ×li for i =
Proof: Let S = blockdiag{S1 , . . . , SN }, where Si =
1li −1 Ili −1
1
0
. By direct computation
1, . . . , N . Clearly, Si has the inverse matrix Si−1 =
−1li −1 Ili −1
one can show that
0 γij
.
Si−1 Lij Sj =
0 L̂ij
This implies the first claim when i = j.
For the second claim, consider that
0 γ11
0 c L̂
1 11
.
..
−1
.
S Lc S =
.
.
0 γN 1
0 L̂N 1
···
0
γ1N
···
...
0
..
.
L̂1N
..
.
···
0
γN N
.
···
0 cN L̂N N
Rearrange the columns and rows of S−1 Lc S by permutation and similarity transformations
to get the following block upper-triangular
01×N
..
.
01×N
0(L−N )×N
matrix
γ11
..
.
···
..
.
γN 1 · · ·
γ1N
..
.
,
γN N
L̂c
where L̂c is defined in (6). Then, the second claim of this lemma follows immediately.
A PPENDIX II
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 1
Proof: The closed-loop system equations for (1) using couplings (4) are given as
X
X
żl = Aci zl − c ci
blk Ezk +
blk Ezk ,
(23)
k∈C
/ i
k∈Ci
for all l ∈ Ci , i = 1 . . . , N , where zl = [xTl , ηlT ]T and
Ai
Bi Ki
0
0
, E =
.
Aci =
0 Ai + Bi Ki
−In In
(24)
Let el (t) := zl (t) − zσi +1 (t) for l ∈ Ci and l 6= σi + 1, i = 1, . . . , N . It follows from (23) and
Assumption 3 that
"
ėl (t) = Aci el (t) − c ci
X
(blk − bσi +1,k )Eek (t)
k∈Ci
+
X
(blk − bσi +1,k )Eek (t) .
(25)
k∈C
/ i
Define a nonsingular transformation matrix Q as follows:
In 0
I
0
, Q−1 = n
,
Q=
In In
−In In
(26)
and let εl (t) := [ξlT (t), ζlT (t)]T = Q−1 el (t). Clearly, ξl = xl − xσi +1 and ζl = ηl − ησi +1 −
xl + xσi +1 . By (25), one can obtain the following dynamic equations:
ξ˙l (t) = (Ai + Bi Ki )ξl (t) + Bi Ki ζl (t),
"
X
(blk − bσi +1,k )ζk (t)
ζ̇l (t) = Ai ζl (t) − c ci
k∈Ci
+
X
(blk − bσi +1,k )ζk (t) ,
k∈C
/ i
for l ∈ Ci and l 6= σi + 1, i = 1, . . . , N . Since Ki stabilizes (Ai , Bi ), the variable εl (t) tends
to zero as t → ∞ if and only if ζl (t) tends to zero. Denote
ζ(t) = [ζσT1 +2 (t), . . . , ζσT1 +l1 (t), · · · , ζσTN +2 (t), . . . , ζσTN +lN (t)]T ,
which evolves with the following differential equation
ζ̇(t) = Â − cL̂c ⊗ In ζ(t).
(27)
Clearly, ζ(t) and every εl (t) (hence every el (t)) all converge to zero if and only if Â−cL̂c ⊗In
is Hurwitz. That is, we have shown that limt→∞ kxl (t) − xk (t)k = 0 and limt→∞ kηl (t) −
ηk (t)k = 0, ∀l, k ∈ Ci , i = 1, . . . , N .
Next, we prove that ηl (t) for any l ∈ I vanishes as t → ∞. To this end, for each
i = 1, . . . , N , let ηi (t) be the solution of η̇i (t) = (Ai + Bi Ki )ηi (t) with an arbitrary initial
P
value ηi (0). Since k∈Cj blk = 0 ∀l ∈ I by Assumption 3, we have that
η̇i (t) = (Ai + Bi Ki )ηi (t)
"
= (Ai + Bi Ki )ηi (t) − c ci (
X
blk )(ησi +1 − xσi +1 )
k∈Ci
N
X
X
+
(
blk )(ησj +1 − xσj +1 ) ,
j=1,j6=i k∈Cj
for any l ∈ Ci . Subtracting the above from (4b) yields
η̇l (t) − η̇i (t) = (Ai + Bi Ki )(ηl (t) − ηi (t))
N
X
X
X
− c ci
blk ζk +
blk ζk .
k∈Ci
j=1,j6=i k∈Cj
The above system is exponentially stable and driven by inputs which all converge to zero
exponentially fast. Therefore, for any ηl (0), l ∈ I, we have ηl (t) → ηi (t) → 0 ∀l ∈ Ci , as
t → ∞.
Lastly, we show that inter-cluster state separations can be achieved for any initial states
xl (0)’s by selecting ηl (0)’s properly. Given any set of xl (0), l ∈ I, choose ηl (0), l ∈ I such
that xl (0)−ηl (0) = xσi +1 (0)−ησi +1 (0) for all l ∈ Ci , i = 1 . . . , N , and lim supt→∞ keAi t [xl (0)−
ηl (0)] − eAj t [xl (0) − ηl (0)]k =
6 0 for any i 6= j. Considering the definition of ζl and the linear
differential equation (27), one has xl (t) − ηl (t) = xσi +1 (t) − ησi +1 (t) for all t > 0. This
together with (4) lead to the following dynamics
ẋl (t) − η̇l (t) = Ai (xl (t) − ηl (t)), ∀l ∈ Ci .
It follows that
xl (t) = eAi t [xl (0) − ηl (0)] + ηl (t)
→ eAi t [xl (0) − ηl (0)], ∀l ∈ Ci as t → ∞.
Therefore, lim supt→∞ kxl (t) − xk (t)k =
6 0 ∀l ∈ Ci , ∀k ∈ Cj , ∀i 6= j. This completes the
proof.
A PPENDIX III
P ROOF OF C OROLLARY 1
Proof: The proof for the necessity and sufficiency of (9) is straightforward using the
results in Lemma 1 and Theorem 1, and thus is omitted for simplicity. We only show that
state separations are possible for any initial states xl (0), l ∈ I by using the dynamic couplings
even for systems with identical parameters.
Constellate the states zl (t) = [xTl (t), ηlT (t)]T of all L agents to form
z(t) := [z1T (t), z2T (t), . . . , zLT (t)]T .
It follows that
ż(t) = (IL ⊗ Ac − cLc ⊗ E)z(t),
(28)
A
BK
0
0
and E =
. One can derive, after a series of manipuwith Ac =
0 A + BK
−In In
lations, that
" N
#
X
z(t) → (
µi νiT ) ⊗ eAc t z(0), as t → ∞,
i=1
where each νi = [νi1 , . . . , νiL ]T ∈ RL is a left eigenvector of Lc such that νiT Lc = 0,
νiT µi = 1, and νiT µj = 0, ∀i 6= j, with µ1 = [1Tl1 , 0TL−l1 ]T , µ2 = [0Tl1 , 1Tl2 , 0TL−l1 −l2 ]T , . . . , µN =
[0TL−lN , 1TlN ]T . It then follows from the definitions of zl (t) and z(t) that for all l ∈ Ci ,
xl (t) →
L
X
νik [eAt xk (0) + (e(A+BK)t − eAt )ηk (0)]
k=1
At
→e
L
X
νik [xk (0) − ηk (0)], as t → ∞.
k=1
Since A is non-Hurwitz, eAt is nonzero as t → ∞. Then, for any set of initial states xl (0),
l ∈ I, one can always find a set of ηl (0), l ∈ I such that lim supt→∞ kxl (t) − xk (t)k =
6 0 for
any two agents l ∈ Ci and k ∈ Cj , i 6= j. This completes the proof.
R EFERENCES
[1] Y. Cao, W. Yu, W. Ren, and G. Chen, “An overview of recent progress in the study of distributed multi-agent
coordination,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 427–438, Feb. 2013.
[2] M. Kumar, D. P. Garg, and V. Kumar, “Segregation of heterogeneous units in a swarm of robotic agents,” IEEE Trans.
Autom. Control, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 743–748, Mar. 2010.
[3] Z. Chen, H. Liao, and T. Chu, “Aggregation and splitting in self-driven swarms,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics
and its Applications, vol. 391, no. 15, pp. 3988–3994, 2012.
[4] F. De Smet and D. Aeyels, “Clustering in a network of non-identical and mutually interacting agents,” Proceedings
of the Royal Society A, vol. 465, pp. 745–768, 2009.
[5] W.-X. Qin and G. Chen, “Coupling schemes for cluster synchronization in coupled Josephson equations,” Physica D:
Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 375–391, 2004.
[6] V. N. Belykh, G. V. Osipov, V. S. Petrov, J. A. Suykens, and J. Vandewalle, “Cluster synchronization in oscillatory
networks,” Chaos, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 037106, 2008.
[7] J. Yu and L. Wang, “Group consensus of multi-agent systems with undirected communication graphs,” in Proc. 7th
Asian Control Conference, 2009, pp. 105–110.
[8] ——, “Group consensus in multi-agent systems with switching topologies and communication delays,” Systems &
Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 340–348, 2010.
[9] W. Xia and M. Cao, “Clustering in diffusively coupled networks,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2395–2405, 2011.
[10] Y. Feng, S. Xu, and B. Zhang, “Group consensus control for double-integrator dynamic multiagent systems with fixed
communication topology,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 3, pp. 532–547, 2014.
[11] Y. Han, W. Lu, and T. Chen, “Cluster consensus in discrete-time networks of multiagents with inter-cluster nonidentical
inputs,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. and Learning Systems, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 566–578, 2013.
[12] ——, “Achieving cluster consensus in continuous-time networks of multi-agents with inter-cluster non-identical inputs,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 793–798, 2015.
[13] W. Wu, W. Zhou, and T. Chen, “Cluster synchronization of linearly coupled complex networks under pinning control,”
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Reg. Papers, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 829–839, 2009.
[14] W. Sun, Y. Bai, R. Jia, R. Xiong, and J. Chen, “Multi-group consensus via pinning control with nonlinear heterogeneous
agents,” in the 8th Asian Control Conference, 2011, pp. 323–328.
[15] W. Lu, B. Liu, and T. Chen, “Cluster synchronization in networks of coupled nonidentical dynamical systems,” Chaos,
vol. 20, no. 1, p. 013120, 2010.
[16] J. Qin and C. Yu, “Cluster consensus control of generic linear multi-agent systems under directed topology with
acyclic partition,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2898 – 2905, 2013.
[17] C. Yu, J. Qin, and H. Gao, “Cluster synchronization in directed networks of partial-state coupled linear systems under
pinning control,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2341 – 2349, 2014.
[18] P. DeLellis, M. di Bernardo, and G. Russo, “On quad, lipschitz, and contracting vector fields for consensus and
synchronization of networks,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Reg. Papers, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 576–583, 2011.
[19] W. Ren and R. Beard, “Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies,”
IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655–661, May 2005.
[20] R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[21] T. I. Fossen, Guidance and Control of Ocean Vehicles. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1994.
[22] Z. Liu and W. S. Wong, “Output cluster synchronization for heterogeneous linear multi-agent systems,” in Proc. IEEE
Conf. Decis. Control, Osaka, Japan, Dec. 15-18, 2015.
[23] H. Liu, C. De Persis, and M. Cao, “Robust decentralized output regulation with single or multiple reference signals
for uncertain heterogeneous systems,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1399–1422, 2015.
[24] P. Wieland, R. Sepulchre, and F. Allgöwer, “An internal model principle is necessary and sufficient for linear output
synchronization,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1068–1074, 2011.
[25] Y. Su and J. Huang, “Cooperative global output regulation of heterogeneous second-order nonlinear uncertain multiagent systems,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3345–3350, 2013.
| 3cs.SY
|
ArbiText: Arbitrary-Oriented Text Detection in Unconstrained Scene
Daitao Xing1,3 , Zichen Li1,3 , Xin Chen4 , and Yi Fang1,2,3∗
arXiv:1711.11249v1 [cs.CV] 30 Nov 2017
1
NYU Multimedia and Visual Computing Lab
2
NYU Abu Dhabi, UAE
3
New York University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
4
HERE Technologies
Abstract
Arbitrary-oriented text detection in the wild is a very
challenging task, due to the aspect ratio, scale, orientation, and illumination variations. In this paper, we propose a novel method, namely Arbitrary-oriented Text (or
ArbText for short) detector, for efficient text detection in
unconstrained natural scene images. Specifically, we first
adopt the circle anchors rather than the rectangular ones
to represent bounding boxes, which is more robust to orientation variations. Subsequently, we incorporate a pyramid pooling module into the Single Shot MultiBox Detector framework, in order to simultaneously explore the local and global visual information, which can therefore generate more confidential detection results. Experiments on
established scene-text datasets, such as the ICDAR 2015
and MSRA-TD500 datasets, have demonstrated the superior performance of the proposed method, compared to the
state-of-the-art approaches.
Figure 1: Text detection results of the proposed ArbiText
method. Images in the first row shows examples from ICDAR2015 dataset, the second row shows examples MSRATD500 dataset
1. Introduction
Understanding texts in the wild plays an important role in
many real-world applications such as PhotoOCR [2], road
sign detection in intelligent vehicles [3], license plate detection [17], and assistive technology for the visually impaired
[6] [1]. To achieve this goal, the task of accurate arbitraryoriented text detection becomes extremely important. Conventionally, when dealing with horizontal texts under controlled environments, this task can be accomplished through
character-based methods such as [9], [10], [18], and [24]
considering that individual letters can be easily segmented
and distinguished. However, in an unconstrained naturalscene image, text detection becomes rather challenging due
∗ 5 Metrotech Center LC024, Brooklyn, NY, 11201;
[email protected]; Tel: +1-646-854-8866
to uncontrolled text variations and uncertainties, such as
multi-orientation, text distortion, background noise, occlusion, and illumination changes. To address these problems, a lot of recent efforts have been devoted to employing
state-of-the-art generic object detectors, such as the Fully
Convolutional Network(FCN) [20], Region-based Convolutional Neural Network(R-CNN) [19], and Single Shot Detector(SSD) [14], for the purpose of text detection in the
wild.
Despite their promising performance in generic object
detection, these methods suffered from bridging gaps between the data distributions of texts and generic objects.
To enhance the generative abilities of existing deep mod-
Email:
1
Figure 2: The Framework of the Proposed Method. Given an input image with a size of 384×384,VGG-16 base network
outputs the first feature map from conv4 3 layer. More feature maps with cascading sizes are extracted from extra layers
following the first feature map. The first feature map is also used to produce different sub-region representations through the
Pyramid Pooling Module. These representation layers are then concatenate feature maps with same size to output the final
feature maps. Finally, those maps are fed into a convolution layer to get the final.
els, [7] proposed to naturally blend rendered words onto
wild images for training data augmentation. The trained
model based on such training data is robust to noises and
uncontrolled variations. [31] and [13] attempted to integrate
region-proposal layers into the deep neural networks, which
can generate text-specific proposals (e.g. bounding boxes
with larger aspect ratios). In [16], the bounding-box rotation proposals were introduced to make the proposed model
more adaptive for unknown orientations of texts in naturalscene images. Nevertheless, the aforementioned scene-text
detectors either needed to consider a lot of proposal hypotheses, thus dramatically decreasing the computational
efficiency, or utilize insufficient preset bounding-box characteristics to handle severe visual variations of scene-texts
in unconstrained natural images.
the conventional rectangular ones. The Single Shot Detector (SSD), one of the state-of-art object detectors, is employed, considering its fast detection speed and promising
accuracy in generic object detection. Besides the feature
maps generated by the original SSD, we additionally incorporate a pyramid pooling module, which can build multiple feature representations on different spatial scales. By
merging those different kinds of feature maps, both the local and global information can be preserved, such that texts
in unconstrained natural scenes can be more reliably detected. Subsequently, the merged feature maps are fed into
a text detection module, consisting of several fully connected convolutional layers, to predict confidential circle
anchors. Furthermore, in order to overcome the difficulty
of deciding positive points caused by unfixed sizes of circle
anchors, we introduce a novel mask loss function by assigning those ambiguous points to a new class. To obtained the
final detection results, the Locality-Aware Non-MaximumSuppression (LANMS) scheme [33] is employed. It should
be noted that we do not utilize any proposal, which makes
the proposed method more computationally efficient.
To address the aforementioned drawbacks of existing
methods, we propose a novel proposal-free model for
arbitrary-oriented text detection in natural images based
on the circle anchors and the Single Shot Detector (SDD)
framework. More specifically, we adopt circle anchors to
represent the bounding boxes, which are more robust to
orientation, aspect ratio, and scale variations, compared to
In summary, the contributions of our work mainly lie in
2
three-fold:
text-line hypothesis. Although these methods can achieve
state-of-art results even with scene-text detection in the
wild, the requirement for a sophisticated post-processing
step of word partitioning and false positive removal can be
too time consuming and computationally intensive for realworld applications.
A more recent method proposed in [33], however, seeks
to make dramatic improvement in efficiency over [29] and
[26] by eliminating intermediate steps such as candidate aggregation and word partitioning in the neural network. Nevertheless, the inherent nature of the segmentation approach dense per-pixel processing and prediction - is still a bottleneck that prevents segmentation-based methods from outperforming its competitors.
Region-Proposal-based Methods: Although regionproposal based models like R-CNN have already been a
state-of-art object detector, it can not be implemented for
the purpose of text detection without modifications since its
anchor box design is not ideal for the large aspect ratio of
words/text-lines. [31] addresses this problem by proposing
a novel Region Proposal Network(RPN) called InceptionRPN, which contains a preset of text characteristic prior
bounding boxes to generate text-specific proposals and thus
filtering out low-quality word regions.
However, [31] only performs well on horizontal texts
since bounding box characteristics are extremely unpredictable for scene-texts in the wild; multi-oriented and distorted texts can create countless possibilities and variations
of bounding-box size, shape, and orientation.
To address this challenge, some researchers designed
novel region-proposal methods: the rotation proposal
method in [16] has the ability to predict the orientation of
a text line and thus generate inclined bounding-boxes for
oriented texts, while the quadrilateral sliding windows in
[15] create a much tighter bounding-box fit around text regions, thus dramatically reduce background noise and interference. On the other hand, some researchers propose methods to modify model architecture like the one proposed in
[5], which adds 2D offsets in the standard convolution to
enable free form deformation of the sampling grid, and the
one proposed in [8], which utilizes direct bounding-box regression originating from a center anchor point in a proposal
region.
SSD-based Methods. SSD-based method is highly stable and efficient in generating word proposals because SSD
is one of the fastest object detector that is also as accurate as slower region-proposal based models like R-CNN.
However, SSD possesses similar shortcomings in terms of
anchor box design when it comes to scene-text detection.
Thus, [13] supplements SSD with ”textbox layers” that can
generate bounding-boxes with larger aspect ratios and simultaneously predict text presence and bounding boxes.
Unfortunately, this method only works on horizontal texts,
• We propose a novel proposal-free method for detecting
arbitrary-oriented texts in unconstrained natural scene
images, based on the circular anchor representation
and the Single Shot Detector framework. The circular
anchors are more robust to different aspect ratio, scale,
and orientation variations, compared to conventional
rectangular ones.
• We incorporate a pyramid pooling module into SSD,
which can explore both the local and global visual information for robust text detection.
• We develop a new mask loss function to overcome the
difficulty of deciding positive points caused by unfixed
sizes of circle anchors, which can therefore improve
the final detection accuracy.
2. Related Works
Character-based detection methods have already
achieved state-of-art results on horizontal texts in relatively controlled and stable environments. Methods like
those proposed in [9], [10], [18], and [24] either detect
individual characters by classification of sliding windows
or utilize some form of connected-component and regionbased framework such as the Maximally Stable Extremal
Regions(MSER) detector.
However, some of these methods might not be ideal for
detecting scene-texts or multi-oriented texts as more and
more environmental variations and uncertainties in terms of
text distortion, orientation, occlusion, and noise are introduced. Detecting individual characters in close clusters or
ones that blend into the background can also be challenging. Hence, many researchers decide to tackle the problem
by approaching the task of text detection as object detection:
treating words and/or text-lines as the target object.
Region-based Convolutional Neural Network(RCNN)[19],
Single
Shot
Detector(SSD)[14],
and
segmentation-based
Fully
Convolutional
Network(FCN)[20] are frequently re-purposed for text
detection because their superior speed and accuracy are
better suited for the time and resource-constraining nature
of the task. Expectedly, a majority of the cutting-edge
research in scene-text detection, including ours, are based
on one of the aforementioned object detection models,
which we will analyze below.
Segmentation-based Methods: Both [29] and [26] accomplish semantic segmentation of text lines by utilizing
Fully Convolutional Network(FCN), which has achieved
great performance in pixel-level classification tasks. In
[29], for example, pixel-wise text/non-text salient map is
first produced via the FCN and subsequently, geometric and
character processing is implemented to generate and filter
3
conv10 2 and global layers. However, local information is
lost as layer goes deeper and deeper, which results in poor
detection precisions especially on texts with complex contextual information.
Inspired by [30], we introduced the Pyramid Pooling
Module to leverage low-level visual information even in
deeper layers. This module fuses feature maps with different pyramid scales. As shown in Fig. 2, the first feature
map from the based network is separated on pyramid levels
into different sub-regions and output pooled representations
after a 1 ∗ 1 convolution layer. Thus, the low-level information of the original image could be preserved in multi-scale
level feature maps, which will be further concatenated with
ones of the same size to form the final feature map for text
detection. By merging these two types of features, both the
local and global visual information can be explored.
Finally, the text detection layer applies a 3∗3 convolution
kernel on the fused feature map to output prediction on the
text bounding box.
Figure 3: Matching of Circle Anchors The red circle is
generated from the ground-truth coordinates, and the blue
circle anchor is the one with same size with red circle on
the feature point. The blue circle which associates the red
one by a vector(cx, cy, area, diameter, angle) where cx and
cy are offset between centers of circles.
3.2. Circle Anchors
and not scene-texts.
Thus in this paper, we attempt to solve the aforementioned limitations of previous detection models by utilizing
a proposal-free method based on circular anchors and the
SSD framework. Our method is computationally more efficient than both segmentation-based and Region-Proposalbased models because the removal of the region-proposal
layer in our network. Our method also improves upon the
existing SSD-based method by having the ability to detect
both arbitrary-oriented texts and generic objects.
As illustrated in Fig. 3, instead of the traditional rectangular anchors, we use circle anchors to represent the bounding box. Specifically, a bounding box can be represented by
a 5-dimensional vector (x, y, a, r, θ), where a, r, and θ denotes the area, radius, and rotated angle of a circle anchor.
a
1
arcsin( 2 )
2
(2r )
x2 = r · cos(α + θ), y2 = r · sin(α + θ)
α=
3. Method
x3 = r · cos(α − θ), y3 = r · sin(α − θ)
(1)
x1 , y1 = −x3 , −y3 , x4 , y4 = −x2 , −y2
In this section, we will describe the details of our proposed model - ArbiText. We will first introduce the framework and network architecture of our method. Subsequently, we will elaborate on the key components such as
the circle anchor representation and the proposed loss function.
x1 , x2 , x3 , x4 = x1 + x, x2 + x, x3 + x, x4 + x
y1 , y2 , y3 , y4 = y1 + y, y2 + y, y3 + y, y4 + y
On a feature map of size (w ∗ w), location,
denoted (i, j), associates a circle anchor C0 with
(c, ∆x, ∆y, ∆a, ∆r, ∆θ), indicating that a unique circle anchor, represented by (x, y, a, r, θ), is detected with confidence c, where
3.1. Model Framework
Our proposed method, in essence, is a multi-scale,
proposal-free framework based on the Single Shot Detector. As shown in Fig.2, our model mainly consists of the
following four components: 1) the backbone-based network
for converting original images into dense feature representations; 2) the feature maps component with cascading map
size for detecting multi-scale texts; 3) the Pyramid Pooling
Module [30] for extracting sub-region feature representations; and 4) the final text detection layer for circle anchor
prediction.
We adopt VGG-16 [22] as our base network, and utilize
the 6 feature maps at the conv4 3, conv7, con8 2, conv9 2,
ra
ra
+ j, y = ∆y ·
+i
w
w
ra
r = exp(∆r) ·
w
ra
a = exp(∆a) ·
w
θ = ∆θ
x = ∆x ·
(2)
Here, we use the area a and radius r for computational
stability. Also, we multiply each value by a factor rwa where
ra =1.5.
4
(a)
(b)
Figure 4: (a) shows the the coordinates of a rectangle.
Given the area and diagonal of rectangle, p2 and p3 can
be calculated by rotation angles. p1 and p4 are diagonal
points of p3 and p1, respectively, which also have negative
values. (b) shows the predictable vertical flag, which is 0 if
the angles of the bounding box are between −45◦ and 45◦ ;
otherwise, it is set to 1.
Figure 6: The Selection of Ground Truth. The blue rectangle is the bounding box and the 10 ∗ 10 grid represents
a feature map with the same size. Only the feature points
in the red eclipse are labeled as positives; the points outside
of the yellow eclipse are labeled as negatives. The feature
points in the yellow region will be labeled as their own separate class.
Figure 5: Score Distribution. (a) shows a bounding box the
text. The red and yellow rectangles are possible bounding
boxes that have maximum IOU overlap scores with ground
truth . (b) shows the eclipse-shape like score function we
use in ArbiText.
For a SSD-based method, all points on a feature map will
potentially be used for minimizing a specific loss function.
Each feature point needs to be labeled as either positive or
negative. Specifically, in SSD, the points that are labeled
as positive are chosen from the regions where the overlap
between the default anchor and ground-truth bounding box
is larger than 0.5. However, there is no default anchor in
our method, but we can still calculate a confidence score for
each point. As illustrated in Fig. 5 (a), the feature point on
the edge of the bounding box can have a maximum overlap of 0.5(bounding boxes are colored in red and yellow).
So the score follows an eclipse distribution (as illustrated
in Fig. 5 (b)). The scores at the center of the eclipse have
a maximum value of 1.0 and it decreases to 0.5 when the
points reach the edge. We use a semi-ellipse as the function
to compute the score for each point. As a result, the points
outside of the eclipse have a score value 0.
Imagine an eclipse score function which has rotation angle θ, the semi-major axes and semi-minor axes have length
of w2 and h2 , respectively, where w and h are the width and
height of the bounding box. Thus, the score function can be
The angle θ is the intersection angle between the long
edge of the bounding box and the horizontal axis. Thus, the
value of θ ranges from −90◦ to 90◦ .
In a deep neural network, each layer has a receptive field
that indicates how much contextual information we can utilize. Although the circle anchor representation is invariant
to scale variations, [32] has shown that feature maps have
limited receptive fields that are much smaller than theoretical ones, especially on high-level layers. As a result, if
we do not utilize multi-scale feature maps, the detection
scope of the proposed circle anchor representation will be
restricted. And considering the size of the extra feature layers, this operation only adds a small amount of computational cost.
3.3. Training Labels Rebuilding and the Loss Function Formulation
.
5
4. Experiments
represented as:
A · (x)2 + B · (x) · (y) + C · (y)2 + F · s2 = F
w
h
a = ;b =
2
2
2
2
2
A = a · sin (θ) + b · cos2 (θ)
4.1. Datasets
In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed
method, we ran experiments on two benchmark datasets:
the ICDAR 2015 dataset and the MSRA-TD500(TD500)
dataset.
SynthText in the Wild[7] dataset contains more than
800,000 synthetic images created by blending rendered
words on wild images. Only samples with width larger than
10 pixels are chosen for training.
ICDAR 2015[34] incidental text dataset is from Challenge 4 of ICDAR 2015 Robust Reading Competition that
includes 1000 training images and 500 testing images.
Since those images are collected by Google Glasses, they
suffer from motion blur. The blurry texts have a label of
”###” and are excluded from our experiment. We also included training and testing images from the ICDAR 2013
dataset[12], which helps us in building a more robust text
detector.
MSRA-TD500(TD500)[4] is a multilingual dataset that
includes oriented texts in both Chinese and English. Unlike
ICDAR 2015, texts in MSRA-TD500 are annotated at the
text-line level and the images were captured more formally,
thus texts are much clearer and standardized. There are a
total of 500 images, 300 of them were used as training data
and 200 were used as testing data.
(3)
B = −2(a2 − b2 ) · sin(θ) · cos(θ)
C = a2 · cos2 (θ) + b2 · sin2 (θ)
F = a2 · b2
where x,y are the distances between a feature point and
the center of the bounding box respectively,s is score. According to the score function, all points inside the eclipse
have a score greater than 0.5. However, the closer the point
is to the edge of the bounding box, the large the noise outside of the bounding box will be, which could make the
training of networks harder to converge. Thus, only the
points with score large than a threshold α will be treated
as positives (as shown in Fig. 6, only points inside the red
zone are labeled as ”positive”). Points outside of the bounding box will be labeled as ”negative”. For those points with
a score between 0.5 and α, we assign them an additional
label. Thus, there will be a total of (N + 1) classes(without
background). This additional class will only be involved in
calculating the classification loss.
The feature maps with different sizes can detect texts
with different scales. A default box will be labeled as positive if
hg
1<
< 4.
(4)
ch
4.2. Implementation Details
Base network In our experiment, we uses a pre-trained
VGG-16 as our based network. This network is widely
used in object detection tasks. All images are resized to
384 ∗ 384 after data augmentation. We extracted five layers with cascading resolution as our feature maps, which
are conv4 3, conv7, conv8, conv9, and conv10. We first
trained our model on the SynthText dataset for 50,000 iterations with a learning rate of 0.001. Then, we fine-tuned
our model using the other datasets with a 0.0005 learning
rate. The details of training different datasets are described
in later sections. We tested our model on different α values
and we discovered that our model achieves optimal performance when α is set to 0.7 for text detection.
Locality-Aware NMS In the post-processing stage,
bounding boxes with a confidence score greater than 0.5
will be used to produce the final output by NMS merging. The naive NMS has O(n2 ) computational complexity,
which is not ideal for real-world applications. We adopt LocalityAware NMS [33] to improve speed of merging bounding boxes.
Hard Negative Mining Hard Negative Mining is essential for SSD-based methods because of the imbalance between positive and negative training samples. We adopt
the same configuration in SSD[14] by selecting the top 3K
where hg is the height of bounding box and ch is the height
of cell on feature map. For training, we use the following
objective loss function:
L(mask, c, l, g) =
λ1
λ2
N +1
1 X
maski · Lcls (ci )+
Ncls i=0
N
1 X
maski · Lloc (l, g)+
Nreg i=1
(5)
N
1 X
maski · Lcls (vertical)
Nreg i=1
where N is the number of object categories, l is the prediction location, and g is the ground-truth location. For each
class, maski = 1 if the corresponding point is labeled as
”positive” and belongs to the i-th class. is the loss for vertical bounding box classification that only includes the positive points. We adopt L1 loss for smoothing and Softmax
loss as the classification losses.
6
Figure 7: Results of ArtTex on the ICDAR2015 dataset. Blue rectangles are detected text regions by using ArtTex.
Table 1: Comparison results of various methods on the ICDAR 2015 Incidental Text dataset
negative training samples, where k is number of positive
training samples. Thus, we adopt Locality-Aware NMS[33]
in our experiment. This algorithm can produce bounding
boxes with greater precision in shorter time.
Data Augmentation We utilize a data augmentation
pipeline that is similar to the one in SSD to make our model
more robust against different text variations. The original
image is randomly cropped into patches. The crop size is
chosen from [0.1, 1] of original image size. Each sample
patch will be horizontally flipped with a probability of 0.5.
In order to balance samples of different orientations, we
also augmented datasets by randomly rotating images by θ
degrees. θ is randomly chosen from the following angle set:
(-90, -75, -60, -45, -30, -15, 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90).
Method
HUST MCLAB
NJU Text
StradVision-2
MCLAB FCN[29]
CTPN[23]
Megcii-Image++
Yao et al.[26]
Seglink [21]
ArbiText
Precision
47.5
72.7
77.5
70.8
51.6
72.4
72.3
73.1
79.2
Recall
34.8
35.8
36.7
43.0
74.2
57.0
58.7
76.8
73.5
F-score
40.2
48.0
49.8
53.6
60.9
63.8
64.8
75.0
75.9
4.3. Detection Results
4.3.1
Detecting Oriented English Text
official off-line evaluation scripts.
We list the results of our model along with other
state-of-art object and text detection methods. The results
were obtained from the original papers. The best result of
this dataset was obtained by Seglink[21], which achieved a
F-measure score of 75.0%. However, our model obtained
a score of 75.9%. The improvement comes from the high
precision rate we obtained, which outperforms the second
First, our model is tested on ICDAR 2015 dataset. The
pre-trained model is fine-tuned using both the ICDAR
2013 and the ICDAR 2015 training datasets after 20k
iterations. Considering all images in ICDAR 2015 have
high resolution, testing images are first resized to 768 ∗ 768.
The threshold α is set to 0.7, similar to the one used in
the pre-training stage. Performance is evaluated using the
7
Figure 8: Results of ArtTex on the MSRA-TD500 dataset. Blue rectangles are detected text regions by using ArtTex.
Table 2: Comparison results of various methods on the
MSRA-TD500 dataset
highest model by 6.1%
Figure.7 shows several detection results taken from the
testing dataset of ICDAR 2015. Our proposed method
ArbiText can distinguish and localize all kinds of scene text
in noisy backgrounds.
4.3.2
Method
Kang et al.[11]
Yao et al.[25]
Yin et al.[27]
Yin et al.[28]
Zhang et al.[29]
Yao et al.[26]
Seglink [21]
ArbiText
Detecting Multi-Lingual Text in Long Lines
We further tested our method on the TD500 dataset consists of long text in English and non-Latin scripts. We augmented this dataset by doing the following: 1) Randomly
place an image on a canvas of n times of the original image size filled by mean values where n ranges from 1 to 3.
2)We applies random crop according to the overlap strategy described in section 4.3. Thus, we obtained enough
images for training. The pre-trained model is fine-tuned for
20K iterations. All images are resized to 384 ∗ 384, which
is consistent with the training stage. The experiment has
demonstrated that this technique can dramatically increase
detection speed without losing much precision. As illustrated in Table 2, ArbiText achieved comparable F-measure
scores with other state-of-the-art methods. However, benefiting from lighter network architecture and simplified anchors mechanism, ArbiText has the highest FPS of 12.1.
Figure.8 shows ArbiText can detect long lines of text
in mixed languages(English and Chinese) without changing
any parameters or structures.
Precision
71
63
81
71
83
77
86
78
Recall
62
63
63
61
67
75
70
72
F-score
66
60
74
65
74
76
77
75
FPS
0.14
0.71
1.25
0.48
∼1.61
8.9
12.1
4.4. Limitations
As shown in Figure.9.a,b, curved texts can’t be represented by circle anchors. Moreover, Figure.9.c shows our
model’s weakness in detecting hand-written texts.
5. Conclusion
We have presented ArbiText, a novel, proposal-free
object detection method that can be utilized to detect
both arbitrary-oriented texts and generic objects simultaneously. Its outstanding performance on different benchmarks
demonstrates that ArbiText is accurate, robust, and flexible
for real-world applications. In the future, we will extend
8
[13]
(a)
(b)
(c)
[14]
Figure 9: Failure Cases On MSRA-TD500 The blue rectangles are true positives. The red ones are false negatives
and yellow ones are false positives. In (a) and (b), ArbiText
fails to detect curved texts. In (c), ArbiText fails to detect
certain hand-written texts
[15]
[16]
the Circle Anchor methodology to detect deformable objects and/or texts.
References
[17]
[1] M. Bastan, H. Kandemir, and B. Canturk. MT3s: Mobile Turkish Scene Text-to-Speech System for the Visually Impaired. arXiv:1608.05054 [cs], Aug. 2016. arXiv:
1608.05054.
[2] A. Bissacco, M. Cummins, Y. Netzer, and H. Neven. PhotoOCR: Reading Text in Uncontrolled Conditions. In 2013
IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages
785–792, Dec. 2013.
[3] L. Chen, Q. Li, M. Li, and Q. Mao. Traffic sign detection and
recognition for intelligent vehicle. In 2011 IEEE Intelligent
Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 908–913, June 2011.
[4] Y. Cong. MSRA Text Detection 500 Database (MSRATD500) - TC11, 2012.
[5] J. Dai, H. Qi, Y. Xiong, Y. Li, G. Zhang, H. Hu, and Y. Wei.
Deformable Convolutional Networks. arXiv:1703.06211
[cs], Mar. 2017. arXiv: 1703.06211.
[6] N. Ezaki, M. Bulacu, and L. Schomaker. Text detection from
natural scene images: towards a system for visually impaired
persons. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference
on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004., volume 2, pages
683–686 Vol.2, Aug. 2004.
[7] A. Gupta, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Synthetic Data for
Text Localisation in Natural Images. arXiv:1604.06646 [cs],
Apr. 2016. arXiv: 1604.06646.
[8] W. He, X.-Y. Zhang, F. Yin, and C.-L. Liu. Deep Direct Regression for Multi-Oriented Scene Text Detection.
arXiv:1703.08289 [cs], Mar. 2017. arXiv: 1703.08289.
[9] W. Huang, Y. Qiao, and X. Tang. Robust Scene Text Detection with Convolution Neural Network Induced MSER
Trees. Sept. 2014.
[10] M. Jaderberg, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. Deep Features
for Text Spotting”, booktitle. 2014.
[11] L. Kang, Y. Li, and D. Doermann. Orientation Robust Text
Line Detection in Natural Images. In 2014 IEEE Conference
on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4034–
4041, June 2014.
[12] D. Karatzas, F. Shafait, S. Uchida, M. Iwamura, L. G. i. Bigorda, S. R. Mestre, J. Mas, D. F. Mota, J. A. Almazn, and
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
9
L. P. d. l. Heras. ICDAR 2013 Robust Reading Competition. In 2013 12th International Conference on Document
Analysis and Recognition, pages 1484–1493, Aug. 2013.
M. Liao, B. Shi, X. Bai, X. Wang, and W. Liu. TextBoxes:
A Fast Text Detector with a Single Deep Neural Network.
arXiv:1611.06779 [cs], Nov. 2016. arXiv: 1611.06779.
W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg. SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. arXiv:1512.02325 [cs], 9905:21–37, 2016. arXiv:
1512.02325.
Y. Liu and L. Jin. Deep Matching Prior Network: Toward
Tighter Multi-oriented Text Detection. arXiv:1703.01425
[cs], Mar. 2017. arXiv: 1703.01425.
J. Ma, W. Shao, H. Ye, L. Wang, H. Wang, Y. Zheng, and
X. Xue. Arbitrary-Oriented Scene Text Detection via Rotation Proposals. arXiv:1703.01086 [cs], Mar. 2017. arXiv:
1703.01086.
S. Z. Masood, G. Shu, A. Dehghan, and E. G. Ortiz. License
Plate Detection and Recognition Using Deeply Learned Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv:1703.07330 [cs], Mar.
2017. arXiv: 1703.07330.
L. Neumann and J. Matas. Real-Time Lexicon-Free Scene
Text Localization and Recognition. IEEE Transactions
on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38(9):1872–
1885, Sept. 2016.
S. Ren, K. He, R. Girshick, and J. Sun. Faster R-CNN:
Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal
Networks. arXiv:1506.01497 [cs], June 2015. arXiv:
1506.01497.
E. Shelhamer, J. Long, and T. Darrell. Fully Convolutional
Networks for Semantic Segmentation. arXiv:1605.06211
[cs], May 2016. arXiv: 1605.06211.
B. Shi, X. Bai, and S. Belongie. Detecting Oriented Text
in Natural Images by Linking Segments. arXiv:1703.06520
[cs], Mar. 2017. arXiv: 1703.06520.
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman.
Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition.
arXiv:1409.1556 [cs], Sept. 2014. arXiv: 1409.1556.
Z. Tian, W. Huang, T. He, P. He, and Y. Qiao. Detecting Text
in Natural Image with Connectionist Text Proposal Network.
arXiv:1609.03605 [cs], Sept. 2016. arXiv: 1609.03605.
T. Wang, D. J. Wu, A. Coates, and A. Y. Ng. End-to-end text
recognition with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR2012), pages 3304–3308, Nov. 2012.
C. Yao, X. Bai, W. Liu, Y. Ma, and Z. Tu. Detecting texts of
arbitrary orientations in natural images. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages
1083–1090, June 2012.
C. Yao, X. Bai, N. Sang, X. Zhou, S. Zhou, and Z. Cao.
Scene Text Detection via Holistic, Multi-Channel Prediction.
arXiv:1606.09002 [cs], June 2016. arXiv: 1606.09002.
X. C. Yin, W. Y. Pei, J. Zhang, and H. W. Hao. MultiOrientation Scene Text Detection with Adaptive Clustering.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37(9):1930–1937, Sept. 2015.
[28] X. C. Yin, X. Yin, K. Huang, and H. W. Hao. Robust Text
Detection in Natural Scene Images. IEEE Transactions on
Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36(5):970–983,
May 2014.
[29] Z. Zhang, C. Zhang, W. Shen, C. Yao, W. Liu, and X. Bai.
Multi-Oriented Text Detection with Fully Convolutional
Networks. arXiv:1604.04018 [cs], Apr. 2016. arXiv:
1604.04018.
[30] H. Zhao, J. Shi, X. Qi, X. Wang, and J. Jia. Pyramid Scene
Parsing Network. arXiv:1612.01105 [cs], Dec. 2016. arXiv:
1612.01105.
[31] Z. Zhong, L. Jin, S. Zhang, and Z. Feng. DeepText: A
Unified Framework for Text Proposal Generation and Text
Detection in Natural Images. arXiv:1605.07314 [cs], May
2016. arXiv: 1605.07314.
[32] B. Zhou, A. Khosla, A. Lapedriza, A. Oliva, and A. Torralba. Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNs.
arXiv:1412.6856 [cs], Dec. 2014. arXiv: 1412.6856.
[33] X. Zhou, C. Yao, H. Wen, Y. Wang, S. Zhou, W. He,
and J. Liang. EAST: An Efficient and Accurate Scene
Text Detector. arXiv:1704.03155 [cs], Apr. 2017. arXiv:
1704.03155.
[34] X. Zhou, S. Zhou, C. Yao, Z. Cao, and Q. Yin. ICDAR 2015
Text Reading in the Wild Competition. arXiv:1506.03184
[cs], June 2015. arXiv: 1506.03184.
10
| 1cs.CV
|
arXiv:1609.06782v2 [cs.CV] 22 Feb 2018
1
Deep Learning for Video
Classification and
Captioning
Zuxuan Wu (University of Maryland, College Park),
Ting Yao (Microsoft Research Asia),
Yanwei Fu (Fudan University),
Yu-Gang Jiang (Fudan University)
1.1
Introduction
Today’s digital contents are inherently multimedia: text, audio, image, video, and
so on. Video, in particular, has become a new way of communication between Internet users with the proliferation of sensor-rich mobile devices. Accelerated by the
tremendous increase in Internet bandwidth and storage space, video data has been
generated, published, and spread explosively, becoming an indispensable part of
today’s big data. This has encouraged the development of advanced techniques for
a broad range of video understanding applications including online advertising,
video retrieval, video surveillance, etc. A fundamental issue that underlies the success of these technological advances is the understanding of video contents. Recent
advances in deep learning in image [Krizhevsky et al. 2012, Russakovsky et al. 2015,
Girshick 2015, Long et al. 2015] and speech [Graves et al. 2013, Hinton et al. 2012]
domains have motivated techniques to learn robust video feature representations
to effectively exploit abundant multimodal clues in video data.
In this chapter, we review two lines of research aiming to stimulate the comprehension of videos with deep learning: video classification and video captioning.
While video classification concentrates on automatically labeling video clips based
on their semantic contents like human actions or complex events, video captioning
4
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
Benchmarks and challenges
Video classification
Video captioning
…
Basketball
Graduation
…
A woman is playing Frisbee with
a black dog on the grass.
Basic deep learning modules
Figure 1.1
An overview of the organization of this chapter.
attempts to generate a complete and natural sentence, enriching video classification’s single label to capture the most informative dynamics in videos.
There have been several efforts surveying the literature on video content understanding. Most of the approaches surveyed in these works adopted handcrafted
features coupled with typical machine learning pipelines for action recognition and
event detection [Aggarwal and Ryoo 2011, Turaga et al. 2008, Poppe 2010, Jiang et al.
2013]. In contrast, this chapter focuses on discussing state-of-the-art deep learning
techniques not only for video classification but also video captioning. As deep learning for video analysis is an emerging and vibrant field, we hope this chapter could
help stimulate future research along the line.
Figure 1.1 shows the organization of this chapter. To make it self-contained, we
first introduce the basic modules that are widely adopted in state-of-the-art deep
learning pipelines in Section 1.2. After that, we discuss representative works on
video classification and video captioning in Section 1.3 and Section 1.4, respectively.
Finally, in Section 1.5 we provide a review of popular benchmarks and challenges
in that are critical for evaluating the technical progress of this vibrant field.
1.2
Basic Deep Learning Modules
In this section, we briefly review basic deep learning modules that have been widely
adopted in the literature for video analysis.
1.2 Basic Deep Learning Modules
5
1.2.1 Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)
Inspired by the visual perception mechanisms of animals [Hubel and Wiesel 1968]
and the McCulloch-Pitts model [McCulloch and Pitts 1943], Fukushima proposed
the “neocognitron” in 1980, which is the first computational model of using local
connectivities between neurons of a hierarchically transformed image [Fukushima
1980]. To obtain the translational invariance, Fukushima applied neurons with the
same parameters on patches of the previous layer at different locations; thus this
can be considered the predecessor of convolutional neural networks (CNN. Further
inspired by this idea, LeCun et al. [1990] designed and trained the modern framework of CNNs LeNet-5, and obtained the state-of-the-art performance on several
pattern recognition datasets (e.g., handwritten character recognition). LeNet-5 has
multiple layers and is trained with the back-propagation algorithm in an end-toend formulation, that is, classifying visual patterns directly by using raw images.
However, limited by the scale of labeled training data and computational power,
LeNet-5 and its variants [LeCun et al. 2001] did not perform well on more complex
vision tasks until recently.
To better train deep networks, Hinton et al. in 2006 made a breakthrough and
introduced deep belief networks (DBNs) to greedily train each layer of the network in an unsupervised manner. And since then, researchers have developed more
methods to overcome the difficulties in training CNN architectures. Particularly,
AlexNet, as one of the milestones, was proposed by Krizhevsky et al. in 2012 and
was successfully applied to large-scale image classification in the well-known ImageNet Challenge. AlexNet contains five convolutional layers followed by three fully
connected (fc) layers [Krizhevsky et al. 2012]. Compared with LeNet-5, two novel
components were introduced in AlexNet:
1. ReLUs (Rectified Linear Units) are utilized to replace the tanh units, which
makes the training process several times faster.
2. Dropout is introduced and has proven to be very effective in alleviating
overfitting.
Inspired by AlexNet, several variants, including VGGNet [Simonyan and Zisserman 2015], GoogLeNet [Szegedy et al. 2015a], and ResNet [He et al. 2016b], have
been proposed to further improve the performance of CNNs on visual recognition
tasks:
VGGNet has two versions, VGG16 and VGG19, which contain 16 and 19 layers,
respectively [Simonyan and Zisserman 2015]. VGGNet pushed the depth of
CNN architecture from 8 layers as in AlexNet to 16–19 layers, which greatly
6
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
improves the discriminative power. In addition, by using very small (3 × 3)
convolutional filters, VGGNet is capable of capturing details in the input
images.
GoogLeNet is inspired by the Hebbian principle with multi-scale processing
and it contains 22 layers [Szegedy et al. 2015a]. A novel CNN architecture
commonly referred to as Inception is proposed to increase both the depth
and the width of CNN while maintaining an affordable computational cost.
There are several extensions upon this work, including BN-Inception-V2
[Szegedy et al. 2015b], Inception-V3 [Szegedy et al. 2015b], and Inception-V4
[Szegedy et al. 2017].
ResNet, as one of the latest deep architectures, has remarkably increased the
depth of CNN to 152 layers using deep residual layers with skip connections
[He et al. 2016b]. ResNet won the first place in the 2015 ImageNet Challenge
and has recently been extended to more than 1000 layers on the CIFAR-10
dataset [He et al. 2016a].
From AlexNet, VGGNet, and GoogLeNet to the more recent ResNet, one trend
in the evolution of these architectures is to deepen the network. The increased
depth allows the network to better approximate the target function, generating better feature representations with higher discriminative power. In addition, various
methods and strategies have been proposed from different aspects, including but
not limited to Maxout [Goodfellow et al. 2013], DropConnect [Wan et al. 2013], and
Batch Normalization [Ioffe and Szegedy 2015], to facilitate the training of deep networks. Please refer to Bengio et al. [2013] and Gu et al. [2016] for a more detailed
review.
1.2.2 Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)
The CNN architectures discussed above are all feed-forward neural networks
(FFNNs) whose connections do not form cycles, which makes them insufficient
for sequence labeling. To better explore the temporal information of sequential
data, recurrent connection structures have been introduced, leading to the emergence of recurrent neural networks (RNNs). Unlike FFNNs, RNNs allow cyclical
connections to form cycles, which thus enables a “memory” of previous inputs to
persist in the network’s internal state [Graves 2012]. It has been pointed out that a
finite-sized RNN with sigmoid activation functions can simulate a universal Turing
machine [Siegelmann and Sontag 1991].
The basic RNN block, at a time step t, accepts an external input vector x (t) ∈ Rn
and generates an output vector z(t) ∈ Rm via a sequence of hidden states
1.2 Basic Deep Learning Modules
7
h(t) ∈ Rr :
h(t) = σ Wx x (t) + Whh(t−1) + bh
(1.1)
z(t) = softmax Wz h(t) + bz
where Wx ∈ Rr×n, Wh ∈ Rr×r , and Wz ∈ Rm×r are weight matrices and bh
and bz are biases. The σ is defined as sigmoid function σ (x) = 1+e1−x and
softmax (.) is the softmax function.
A problem with RNN is that it is not capable of modeling long-range
dependencies and is unable to store information about past inputs for a
very long period [Bengio et al. 1994], though one large enough RNN should,
in principle, be able to approximate the sequences of arbitrary complexity.
Specifically, two well-known issues—vanishing and exploding gradients, exist
in training RNNs: the vanishing gradient problem refers to the exponential
shrinking of gradients’ magnitude as they are propagated back through time;
and the exploding gradient problem refers to the explosion of long-term components due to the large increase in the norm of the gradient during training
sequences with long-term dependencies. To solve these issues, researchers
introduced Long short-term memory models.
Long short-term memory (LSTM) is an RNN variant that was designed to store
and access information in a long time sequence. Unlike standard RNNs, nonlinear multiplicative gates and a memory cell are introduced. These gates,
including input, output, and forget gates, govern the information flow into
and out of the memory cell. The structure of an LSTM unit is illustrated in
Figure 1.2.
h(t–1)
f (t)
Memory cell
o(t)
i (t)
Figure 1.2
×
c (t)
×
Output
x(t)
Input
×
h(t)
The structure of an LSTM unit. (Modified from Wu et al. [2016])
8
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
More specifically, given a sequence of an external input vector x (t) ∈ Rn, an
LSTM maps the input to an output vector z(t) ∈ Rm by computing activations
of the units in the network with the following equations recursively from t = 1
to t = T :
i(t) = σ (Wxi x (t) + Whi h(t−1) + Wci c(t) + bi ),
(1.2)
f (t) = σ (Wxf x (t) + Whf h(t) + Wcf c(t) + bf ),
c(t) = f (t)c(t−1) + it tanh(Wxc x (t) + Whc h(t−1) + bc ),
o(t) = σ (Wxo x (t) + Who h(t−1) + Wco c(t) + bo ),
h(t) = o(t) tanh(c(t)),
where x (t) , h(t) are the input and hidden vectors with the subscription t denoting the t-th time step, while i(t) , f (t) , c(t) , o(t) are, respectively, the activation
vectors of the input gate, forget gate, memory cell, and output gate. Wαβ denotes the weight matrix between α and β. For example, the weight matrix
from the input x (t) to the input gate i(t) is Wxi .
In Equation 1.2 and Figure 1.2 and at time step t, the input x (t) and the
previous states h(t−1) are used as the input of LSTM. The information of the
memory cell is updated/controlled from two sources: (1) the previous cell
memory unit c(t−1) and (2) the input gate’s activation it . Specifically, c(t−1) is
multiplied by the activation from the forget gate f (t), which learns to forget
the information of the previous states. In contrast, the it is combined with
the new input signal to consider new information. LSTM also utilizes the
output gate o(t) to control the information received by hidden state variable
h(t). To sum up, with these explicitly designed memory units and gates, LSTM
is able to exploit the long-range temporal memory and avoids the issues of
vanishing/exploding gradients. LSTM has recently been popularly used for
video analysis, as will be discussed in the following sections.
1.3
Video Classification
The sheer volume of video data has motivated approaches to automatically categorizing video contents according to classes such as human activities and complex
events. There is a large body of literature focusing on computing effective local
feature descriptors (e.g., HoG, HoF, MBH, etc.) from spatio-temporal volumes to
account for temporal clues in videos. These features are then quantized into bagof-words or Fisher Vector representations, which are further fed into classifiers like
1.3 Video Classification
9
support vector machines (SVMs). In contrast to hand crafting features, which is
usually time-consuming and requires domain knowledge, there is a recent trend
to learn robust feature representations with deep learning from raw video data.
In the following, we review two categories of deep learning algorithms for video
classification, i.e., supervised deep learning and unsupervised feature learning.
1.3.1 Supervised Deep Learning for Classification
1.3.1.1
Image-Based Video Classification
The great success of CNN features on image analysis tasks [Girshick et al. 2014,
Razavian et al. 2014] has stimulated the utilization of deep features for video classification. The general idea is to treat a video clip as a collection of frames, and then
for each frame, feature representation could be derived by running a feed-forward
pass till a certain fully-connected layer with state-of-the-art deep models pre-trained
on ImageNet [Deng et al. 2009], including AlexNet [Krizhevsky et al. 2012], VGGNet
[Simonyan and Zisserman 2015], GoogLeNet [Szegedy et al. 2015a], and ResNet [He
et al. 2016b], as discussed earlier. Finally, frame-level features are averaged into
video-level representations as inputs of standard classifiers for recognition, such
as the well-known SVMs.
Among the works on image-based video classification, Zha et al. [2015] systematically studied the performance of image-based video recognition using features
from different layers of deep models together with multiple kernels for classification. They demonstrated that off-the-shelf CNN features coupled with kernel SVMs
can obtain decent recognition performance. Motivated by the advanced feature encoding strategies in images [Sánchez et al. 2013], Xu et al. [2015c] proposed to
obtain video-level representation through vector of locally aggregated descriptors
(VLAD) encoding [Jégou et al. 2010b], which can attain performance gain over the
trivial averaging pooling approach. Most recently, Qiu et al. [2016] devised a novel
Fisher Vector encoding with Variational AutoEncoder (FV-VAE) to quantize the local
activations of the convolutional layer, which learns powerful visual representations
of better generalization.
1.3.1.2
End-to-End CNN Architectures
The effectiveness of CNNs on a variety of tasks lies in their capability to learn features from raw data as an end-to-end pipeline targeting a particular task [Szegedy
et al. 2015a, Long et al. 2015, Girshick 2015]. Therefore, in contrast to the imagebased classification methods, there are many works focusing on applying CNN
models to the video domain with an aim to learn hidden spatio-temporal patterns.
Ji et al. [2010] introduced the 3D CNN model that operates on stacked video frames,
10
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
extending the traditional 2D CNN designed for images to the spatio-temporal space.
The 3D CNN utilizes 3D kernels for convolution to learn motion information between adjacent frames in volumes segmented by human detectors. Karpathy et al.
[2014] compared several similar architectures on a large scale video dataset in order
to explore how to better extend the original CNN architectures to learn spatiotemporal clues in videos. They found that the performance of the CNN model with
a single frame as input achieves similar results to models operating on a stack of
frames, and they also suggested that a mixed-resolution architecture consisting of a
low-resolution context and a high-resolution stream could speed up training effectively. Recently, Tran et al. [2015] also utilized 3D convolutions with modern deep
architectures. However, they adopted full frames as the inputs of 3D CNNs instead
of the segmented volumes in Ji et al. [2010].
Though the extension of conventional CNN models by stacking frames makes
sense, the performance of such models is worse than that of state-of-the-art handcrafted features [Wang and Schmid 2013]. This may be because the spatio-temporal
patterns in videos are too complex to be captured by deep models with insufficient training data. In addition, the training of CNNs with inputs of 3D volumes is
usually time-consuming. To effectively handle 3D signals, Sun et al. [2015] introduced factorized spatio-temporal convolutional networks that factorize the original
3D convolution kernel learning as a sequential process of learning 2D spatial kernels in the lower layer. In addition, motivated by the fact that videos can naturally
be decomposed into spatial and temporal components, Simonyan and Zisserman
[2014] proposed a two-stream approach (see Figure 1.3), which breaks down the
learning of video representation into separate feature learning of spatial and temporal clues. More specifically, the authors first adopted a typical spatial CNN to
model appearance information with raw RGB frames as inputs. To account for
temporal clues among adjacent frames, they explicitly generated multiple-frame
dense optical flow, upon which a temporal CNN is trained. The dense optical flow
is derived from computing displacement vector fields between adjacent frames (see
Figure 1.4), which represent motions in an explicit way, making the training of the
network easier. Finally, at test time, each individual CNN generates a prediction
by averaging scores from 25 uniformly sampled frames (optical flow frames) for a
video clip, and then the final output is produced by the weighted sum of scores from
the two streams. The authors reported promising results on two action recognition
benchmarks. As the two-stream approach contains many implementation choices
that may affect the performance, Ye et al. [2015b] evaluated different options, including dropout ratio and network architecture, and discussed their findings.
Very recently, there have been several extensions of the two-stream approach.
Wang et al. utilized the point trajectories from the improved dense trajectories
1.3 Video Classification
·· ··
·· ··
11
··
···
Individual
frame
Spatial stream CNN
Score
fusion
·· ··
·· ··
··
···
Stacked
optical flow
Motion stream CNN
Figure 1.3
Two-stream CNN framework. (From Wu et al. [2015c])
Figure 1.4
Examples of optical flow images. (From Simonyan and Zisserman [2014])
[Wang and Schmid 2013] to pool two-stream convolutional feature maps to generate trajectory-pooled deep-convolutional descriptors (TDD) [Wang et al. 2015].
Feichtenhofer et al. [2016] improved the two-stream approach by exploring a better fusion approach to combine spatial and temporal streams. They found that two
streams could be fused using convolutional layers rather than averaging classification scores to better model the correlations of spatial and temporal streams.
Wang et al. [2016b] introduced temporal segment networks, where each segment is
used as the input of a two-stream network and the final prediction of a video clip is
produced by a consensus function combining segment scores. Zhang et al. [2016]
proposed to replace the optical flow images with motion vectors with an aim to
achieve real-time action recognition. More recently, Wang et al. [2016c] proposed
to learn feature representation by modeling an action as a transformation from an
initial state (condition) to a new state (effect) with two Siamese CNN networks, operating on RGB frames and optical flow images. Similar to the original two-stream
approach, they then fused the classification scores from two streams linearly to obtain final predictions. They reported better results on two challenging benchmarks
12
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
than Simonyan and Zisserman [2014], possibly because the transformation from
precondition to effect could implicitly model the temporal coherence in videos.
Zhu et al. [2016] proposed a key volume mining approach that attempts to identify
key volumes and perform classification at the same time. Bilen et al. [2016] introduced the dynamic image to represent motions with rank pooling in videos, upon
which a CNN model is trained for recognition.
1.3.1.3
Modeling Long-Term Temporal Dynamics
As discussed earlier, the temporal CNN in the two-stream approach [Simonyan
and Zisserman 2014] explicitly captures the motion information among adjacent
frames, which, however, only depicts movements within a short time window. In
addition, during the training of CNN models, each sweep takes a single frame (or a
stacked optical frame image) as the input of the network, failing to take the order
of frames into account. This is not sufficient for video analysis, since complicated
events/actions in videos usually consist of multiple actions happening over a long
time. For instance, a “making pizza” event can be decomposed into several sequential actions, including “making the dough,” “topping,” and “baking.” Therefore,
researchers have recently attempted to leverage RNN models to account for the
temporal dynamics in videos, among which LSTM is a good fit without suffering
from the “vanishing gradient” effect, and has demonstrated its effectiveness in several tasks like image/video captioning [Donahue et al. 2017, Yao et al. 2015a] (to be
discussed in detail later) and speech analysis [Graves et al. 2013].
Donahue et al. [2017] trained two two-layer LSTM networks (Figure 1.5) for action recognition with features from the two-stream approach. They also tried to
fine-tune the CNN models together with LSTM but did not obtain significant performance gain compared with only training the LSTM model. Wu et al. [2015c] fused
the outputs of LSTM models with CNN models to jointly model spatio-temporal
clues for video classification and observed that CNNs and LSTMs are highly complementary. Ng et al. [2015] further trained a 5-layer LSTM model and compared
several pooling strategies. Interestingly, the deep LSTM model performs on par
with single frame CNN on a large YouTube video dataset called Sports-1M, which
may be because the videos in this dataset are uploaded by ordinary users without
professional editing and contain cluttered backgrounds and severe camera motion.
Veeriah et al. [2015] introduced a differential gating scheme for LSTM to emphasize the change in information gain to remove redundancy in videos. Recently, in a
multi-granular spatio-temporal architecture [Li et al. 2016a], LSTMs have been utilized to further model the temporal information of frame, motion, and clip streams.
Wu et al. [2016] further employed a CNN operating on spectrograms derived from
1.3 Video Classification
Figure 1.5
13
LSTM
LSTM
yt
LSTM
LSTM
yt+1
LSTM
LSTM
yt+2
LSTM
LSTM
yt+n
Utilizing LSTMs to explore temporal dynamics in videos with CNN features as inputs.
soundtracks of videos to complement visual clues captured by CNN and LSTMs,
and demonstrated strong results.
1.3.1.4
Incorporating Visual Attention
Videos contain many frames. Using all of them is computationally expensive and
may degrade the performance of recognizing a class of interest as not all the frames
are relevant. This issue has motivated researchers to leverage the attention mechanism to identify the most discriminative spatio-temporal volumes that are directly
related to the targeted semantic class. Sharma et al. [2015] proposed the first attention LSTM for action recognition with a soft-attention mechanism to attach higher
importance to the learned relevant parts in video frames. More recently, Li et al.
[2016c] introduced the VideoLSTM, which applied attention in convolutional LSTM
models to discover relevant spatio-temporal volumes. In addition to soft-attention,
VideoLSTM also employed motion-based attention derived from optical flow images for better action localization.
1.3.2 Unsupervised Video Feature Learning
Current remarkable improvements with deep learning heavily rely on a large
amount of labeled data. However, scaling up to thousands of video categories
presents significant challenges due to insurmountable annotation efforts even at
video level, not to mention frame-level fine-grained labels. Therefore, the utilization
of unsupervised learning, integrating spatial and temporal context information, is
a promising way to find and represent structures in videos. Taylor et al. [2010]
14
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
proposed a convolutional gated boltzmann Machine to learn to represent optical
flow and describe motion. Le et al. [2011] utilized two-layer independent subspace
analysis (ISA) models to learn spatio-temporal models for action recognition. More
recently, Srivastava et al. [2015] adopted an encoder-decoder LSTM to learn feature
representations in an unsupervised way. They first mapped an input sequence into
a fixed-length representation by an encoder LSTM, which would be further decoded
with single or multiple decoder LSTMs to perform different tasks, such as reconstructing the input sequence, or predicting the future sequence. The model was
first pre-trained on YouTube data without manual labels, and then fine-tuned on
standard benchmarks to recognize actions. Pan et al. [2016a] explored both local
temporal coherence and holistic graph structure preservation to learn a deep intrinsic video representation in an end-to-end fashion. Ballas et al. [2016] leveraged
convolutional maps from different layers of a pre-trained CNN as the input of a
gated recurrent unit (GRU)-RNN to learn video representations.
Summary
The latest developments discussed above have demonstrated the effectiveness of
deep learning for video classification. However, current deep learning approaches
for video classification usually resort to popular deep models in image and speech
domain. The complicated nature of video data, containing abundant spatial, temporal, and acoustic clues, makes off-the-shelf deep models insufficient for videorelated tasks. This highlights the need for a tailored network to effectively capture
spatial and acoustic information, and most importantly to model temporal dynamics. In addition, training CNN/LSTM models requires manual labels that are usually
expensive and time-consuming to acquire, and hence one promising direction is to
make full utilization of the substantial amounts of unlabeled video data and rich
contextual clues to derive better video representations.
1.4
Video Captioning
Video captioning is a new problem that has received increasing attention from
both computer vision and natural language processing communities. Given an input video, the goal is to automatically generate a complete and natural sentence,
which could have a great potential impact, for instance, on robotic vision or on
helping visually impaired people. Nevertheless, this task is very challenging, as
a description generation model should capture not only the objects, scenes, and
activities presented in the video, but also be capable of expressing how these objects/scenes/activities relate to each other in a natural sentence. In this section, we
elaborate the problem by surveying the state-of-the-art methods. We classify exist-
1.4 Video Captioning
15
Input video:
…
Video tagging:
baby, boy, chair
Figure 1.6
…
Video (frame) captioning:
Two baby boys are in the chair.
Video captioning:
A baby boy is biting finger of
another baby boy.
Examples of video tagging, image (frame) captioning, and video captioning. The input is
a short video, while the output is a text response to this video, in the form of individual
words (tags), a natural sentence describing one single image (frame), and dynamic
video contents, respectively.
ing methods in terms of different strategies for sentence modeling. In particular,
we distill a common architecture of combining convolutional and recurrent neural
networks for video captioning. As video captioning is an emerging area, we start by
introducing the problem in detail.
1.4.1 Problem Introduction
Although there has already been extensive research on video tagging [Siersdorfer
et al. 2009, Yao et al. 2013] and image captioning [Vinyals et al. 2015, Donahue
et al. 2017], video-level captioning has its own characteristics and thus is different
from tagging and image/frame-level captioning. A video tag is usually the name of
a specific object, action, or event, which is recognized in the video (e.g., “baby,”
“boy,” and “chair” in Figure 1.6). Image (frame) captioning goes beyond tagging
by describing an image (frame) with a natural sentence, where the spatial relationships between objects or object and action are further described (e.g., “Two baby
boys are in the chair” generated on one single frame of Figure 1.6). Video captioning has been taken as an even more challenging problem, as a description should
not only capture the above-mentioned semantic knowledge in the video but also
express the spatio-temporal relationships in between and the dynamics in a natural sentence (e.g., “A baby boy is biting finger of another baby boy” for the video in
Figure 1.6).
Despite the difficulty of the problem, there have been several attempts to address video caption generation [Pan et al. 2016b, Yu et al. 2016, Xu et al. 2016],
which are mainly inspired by recent advances in machine translation [Sutskever
16
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
et al. 2014]. The elegant recipes behind this are the promising developments of
the CNNs and the RNNs. In general, 2D [Simonyan and Zisserman 2015] and/or
3D CNNs [Tran et al. 2015] are exploited to extract deep visual representations and
LSTM [Hochreiter and Schmidhuber 1997] is utilized to generate the sentence word
by word. More sophisticated frameworks, additionally integrating internal or external knowledge in the form of high-level semantic attributes or further exploring the
relationship between the semantics of sentence and video content, have also been
studied for this problem.
In the following subsections we present a comprehensive review of video captioning methods through two main categories based on the strategies for sentence
generation (Section 1.4.2) and generalizing a common architecture by leveraging
sequence learning for video captioning (Section 1.4.3).
1.4.2 Approaches for Video Captioning
There are mainly two directions for video captioning: a template-based language
model [Kojima et al. 2002, Rohrbach et al. 2013, Rohrbach et al. 2014, Guadarrama
et al. 2013, Xu et al. 2015b] and sequence learning models (e.g., RNNs) [Donahue
et al. 2017, Pan et al. 2016b, Xu et al. 2016, Yu et al. 2016, Venugopalan et al. 2015a,
Yao et al. 2015a, Venugopalan et al. 2015b, Venugopalan et al. 2015b]. The former
predefines the special rule for language grammar and splits the sentence into several parts (e.g., subject, verb, object). With such sentence fragments, many works
align each part with detected words from visual content by object recognition and
then generate a sentence with language constraints. The latter leverages sequence
learning models to directly learn a translatable mapping between video content and
sentence. We will review the state-of-the-art research along these two dimensions.
1.4.2.1
Template-based Language Model
Most of the approaches in this direction depend greatly on the sentence templates
and always generate sentences with syntactical structure. Kojima et al. [2002] is
one of the early works that built a concept hierarchy of actions for natural language description of human activities. Tan et al. [2011] proposed using predefined
concepts and sentence templates for video event recounting. Rohrbach et al.’s conditional random field (CRF) learned to model the relationships between different
components of the input video and generate descriptions for videos [Rohrbach et al.
2013]. Furthermore, by incorporating semantic unaries and hand-centric features,
Rohrbach et al. [2014] utilized a CRF-based approach to generate coherent video
descriptions. In 2013, Guadarrama et al. used semantic hierarchies to choose an
appropriate level of the specificity and accuracy of sentence fragments. Recently, a
1.4 Video Captioning
17
deep joint video-language embedding model in Xu et al. [2015b] was designed for
video sentence generation.
1.4.2.2
Sequence Learning
Unlike the template-based language model, sequence learning-based methods can
learn the probability distribution in the common space of visual content and textual sentence and generate novel sentences with more flexible syntactical structure. Donahue et al. [2017] employed a CRF to predict activity, object, and location
present in the video input. These representations were concatenated into an input
sequence and then translated to a natural sentence with an LSTM model. Later,
Venugopalan et al. [2015b] proposed an end-to-end neural network to generate
video descriptions by reading only the sequence of video frames. By mean pooling, the features over all the frames can be represented by one single vector, which
is the input of the following LSTM model for sentence generation. Venugopalan
et al. [2015a] then extended the framework by inputting both frames and optical flow images into an encoder-decoder LSTM. Inspired by the idea of learning
visual-semantic embedding space in search [Pan et al. 2014, Yao et al. 2015b],
[Pan et al. 2016b] additionally considered the relevance between sentence semantics and video content as a regularizer in LSTM based architecture. In contrast to
mean pooling, Yao et al. [2015a] proposed to utilize the temporal attention mechanism to exploit temporal structure as well as a spatio-temporal convolutional
neural network to obtain local action features. Then, the resulting video representations were fed into the text-generating RNN. In addition, similar to the knowledge
transfer from image domain to video domain [Yao et al. 2012, 2015c], Liu and Shi
[2016] leveraged the learned models on image captioning to generate a caption
for each video frame and incorporate the obtained captions, regarded as the attributes of each frame, into a sequence-to-sequence architecture to generate video
descriptions. Most recently, with the encouraging performance boost reported on
the image captioning task by additionally utilizing high-level image attributes in
Yao et al. [2016], Pan et al. [2016c] further leveraged semantic attributes learned
from both images and videos with a transfer unit for enhancing video sentence
generation.
1.4.3 A Common Architecture for Video Captioning
To better summarize the frameworks of video captioning by sequence learning, we
illustrate a common architecture as shown in Figure 1.7. Given a video, 2D and/or
3D CNNs are utilized to extract visual features on raw video frames, optical flow
images, and video clips. The video-level representations are produced by mean
18
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
…
…
a
small
red
#end
…
Mean pooling/
soft-attention
LSTM
LSTM
LSTM
…
…
#start
Figure 1.7
LSTM
3D CNN
…
Optical flow images
…
2D CNN
…
Raw video frames
a
small
street
A common architecture for video captioning by sequence learning. The video representations are produced by mean pooling or soft-attention over the visual features of raw
video frames/optical flow images/video clips, extracted by 2D/3D CNNs. The sentence
is generated word by word in the following LSTM, based on the video representations.
pooling or soft attention over these visual features. Then, an LSTM is trained for
generating a sentence based on the video-level representations.
Technically, suppose we have a video V with Nv sample frames/optical images/clips (uniform sampling) to be described by a textual sentence S, where S =
{w1 , w2 , . . . , wNs } consisting of Ns words. Let v ∈ RDv and wt ∈ RDw denote the Dv dimensional visual features of a video V and the Dw -dimensional textual features
of the t-th word in sentence S, respectively. As a sentence consists of a sequence of
words, a sentence can be represented by a Dw × Ns matrix W ≡ [w1 , w2 , . . . , wNs ],
with each word in the sentence as its column vector. Hence, given the video representations v, we aim to estimate the conditional probability of the output word
sequence {w1 , w2 , . . . , wNs }, i.e.,
Pr (w1 , w2 , . . . , wNs |v).
(1.3)
Since the model produces one word in the sentence at each time step, it is
natural to apply the chain rule to model the joint probability over the sequential
words. Thus, the log probability of the sentence is given by the sum of the log
probabilities over the words and can be expressed as:
log Pr (W|v) =
Ns
t=1
log Pr wt v, w1 , . . . , wt−1 .
(1.4)
1.5 Benchmarks and Challenges
19
In the model training, we feed the start sign word #start into LSTM, which
indicates the start of the sentence generation process. We aim to maximize the log
probability of the output video description S given the video representations, the
previous words it has seen, and the model parameters θ, which can be formulated as
∗
θ = arg max
θ
Ns
log Pr wt v, w1 , . . . , wt−1; θ .
(1.5)
t=1
This log probability is calculated and optimized over the whole training dataset
using stochastic gradient descent. Note that the end sign word #end is required to
terminate the description generation. During inference, we choose the word with
maximum probability at each time step and set it as the LSTM input for the next
time step until the end sign word is emitted.
Summary
The introduction of the video captioning problem is relatively new. Recently, this
task has sparked significant interest and may be regarded as the ultimate goal of
video understanding. Video captioning is a complex problem and has been initially
forwarded by the fundamental technological advances in recognition that can effectively recognize key objects or scenes from video contents. The developments of
RNNs in machine translation have further accelerated the growth of this research
direction. The recent results, although encouraging, are still indisputably far from
practical use, as the forms of the generated sentences are simple and the vocabulary
is still limited. How to generate free-form sentences and support open vocabulary
are vital issues for the future of this task.
1.5
Benchmarks and Challenges
We now discuss popular benchmarks and challenges for video classification (Section 1.5.1) and video captioning (Section 1.5.2).
1.5.1 Classification
Research on video classification has been stimulated largely by the release of the
large and challenging video datasets such as UCF101 [Soomro et al. 2012], HMDB51
[Kuehne et al. 2011], and FCVID [Jiang et al. 2015], and by the open challenges
organized by fellow researchers, including the THUMOS challenge [Jiang et al.
2014b], the ActivityNet Large Scale Activity Recognition Challenge [Heilbron et al.
2015], and the TRECVID multimedia event detection (MED) task [Over et al. 2014].
20
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
Table 1.1
Popular benchmark datasets for video classification, sorted by the year of
construction
Dataset
KTH
#Video
#Class
Released Year
Background
600
6
2004
Clean Static
81
9
2005
Clean Static
1,358
25
2007
Dynamic
430
8
2008
Dynamic
Hollywood2
1,787
12
2009
Dynamic
MCG-WEBV
234,414
15
2009
Dynamic
800
16
2010
Dynamic
HMDB51
6,766
51
2011
Dynamic
CCV
9,317
20
2011
Dynamic
UCF-101
13,320
101
2012
Dynamic
THUMOS-2014
18,394
101
2014
Dynamic
≈31,000
20
2014
Dynamic
Sports-1M
1,133,158
487
2014
Dynamic
ActivityNet
27,901
203
2015
Dynamic
EventNet
95,321
500
2015
Dynamic
MPII Human Pose
20,943
410
2014
Dynamic
FCVID
91,223
239
2015
Dynamic
Weizmann
Kodak
Hollywood
Olympic Sports
MED-2014 (Dev. set)
In the following, we first discuss related datasets according to the list shown in
Table 1.1, and then summarize the results of existing works.
1.5.1.1
Datasets
KTH dataset is one of the earliest benchmarks for human action recognition
[Schuldt et al. 2004]. It contains 600 short videos of 6 human actions performed by 25 people in four different scenarios.
Weizmann dataset is another very early and simple dataset, consisting of 81
short videos associated with 9 actions performed by 9 actors [Blank et al.
2005].
Kodak Consumer Videos dataset was recorded by around 100 customers of
the Eastman Kodak Company [Loui et al. 2007]. The dataset collected 1,358
1.5 Benchmarks and Challenges
21
video clips labeled with 25 concepts (including activities, scenes, and single
objects) as a part of the Kodak concept ontology.
Hollywood Human Action dataset contains 8 action classes collected from 32
Hollywood movies, totaling 430 video clips [Laptev et al. 2008]. It was further extended to the Hollywood2 [Marszalek et al. 2009] dataset, which is
composed of 12 actions from 69 Hollywood movies with 1,707 video clips in
total. This Hollywood series is challenging due to cluttered background and
severe camera motion throughout the datasets.
MCG-WEBV dataset is another large set of YouTube videos that has 234,414 web
videos with annotations on several topic-level events like “a conflict at Gaza”
[Cao et al. 2009].
Olympic Sports includes 800 video clips and 16 action classes [Niebles et al.
2010]. It was first introduced in 2010 and, unlike in previous datasets, all the
videos were downloaded from the Internet.
HMDB51 dataset comprises 6,766 videos annotated into 51 classes [Kuehne
et al. 2011]. The videos are from a variety of sources, including movies and
YouTube consumer videos.
Columbia Consumer Videos (CCV) dataset was constructed in 2011, aiming to
stimulate research on Internet consumer video analysis [Jiang et al. 2011]. It
contains 9,317 user-generated videos from YouTube, which were annotated
into 20 classes, including objects (e.g., “cat” and “dog”), scenes (e.g., “beach”
and “playground”), sports events (e.g., “basketball” and “soccer”), and social
activities (e.g., “birthday” and “graduation”).
UCF-101 & THUMOS-2014 dataset is another popular benchmark for human action recognition in videos, consisting of 13,320 video clips (27 hours in total)
with 101 annotated classes such as “diving” and “weight lifting” [Soomro
et al. 2012]. More recently, the THUMOS-2014 Action Recognition Challenge
[Jiang et al. 2014b] created a benchmark by extending the UCF-101 dataset
(used as the training set). Additional videos were collected from the Internet,
including 2,500 background videos, 1,000 validation videos, and 1,574 test
videos.
TRECVID MED dataset was released and annually updated by the task of MED,
created by NIST since 2010 [Over et al. 2014]. Each year an extended dataset based on datasets from challenges of previous years is constructed and
released for worldwide system comparison. For example, in 2014 the MED
22
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
dataset contained 20 events, such as “birthday party,” “bike trick,” etc. According to NIST, in the development set, there are around 8,000 videos for
training and 23,000 videos used as dry-run validation samples (1,200 hours
in total). The MED dataset is only available to the participants of the task,
and the labels of the official test set (200,000 videos) are not available even
to the participants.
Sports-1M dataset consists of 1 million YouTube videos in 487 classes, such
as “bowling,” “cycling,” “rafting,” etc., and has been available since 2014
[Karpathy et al. 2014]. The video annotations were automatically derived by
analyzing online textual contexts of the videos. Therefore the labels of this
dataset are not clean, but the authors claim that the quality of annotation is
fairly good.
ActivityNet dataset is another large-scale video dataset for human activity recognition and understanding and was released in 2015 [Heilbron et al. 2015]. It
consists of 27,801 video clips annotated into 203 activity classes, totaling 849
hours of video. Compared with existing datasets, ActivityNet contains more
fine-grained action categories (e.g., “drinking beer” and “drinking coffee”).
EventNet dataset consists of 500 events and 4,490 event-specific concepts and
was released in 2015 [Ye et al. 2015a]. It includes automatic detection models
for its video events and some constituent concepts, with around 95,000
training videos from YouTube. Similarly to Sports-1M, EventNet was labeled
by online textual information rather than manually labeled.
MPII Human Pose dataset includes around 25,000 images containing over
40,000 people with annotated body joints [Andriluka et al. 2014]. According
to an established taxonomy of human activities (410 in total), the collected
images (from YouTube videos) were provided with activity labels.
Fudan-Columbia Video Dataset (FCVID) dataset contains 91,223 web videos
annotated manually into 239 categories [Jiang et al. 2015]. The categories
cover a wide range of topics, such as social events (e.g., “tailgate party”),
procedural events (e.g., “making cake”), object appearances (e.g., “panda”),
and scenes (e.g., “beach”).
1.5.1.2
Challenges
To advance the state of the art in video classification, several challenges have been
introduced with the aim of exploring and evaluating new approaches in realistic
settings. We briefly introduce three representative challenges here.
1.5 Benchmarks and Challenges
23
THUMOS Challenge was first introduced in 2013 in the computer vision community, aiming to explore and evaluate new approaches for large-scale action
recognition of Internet videos [Idrees et al. 2016]. The three editions of the
challenge organized in 2013–2015 made THUMOS a common benchmark
for action classification and detection.
TRECVID Multimedia Event Detection (MED) Task aims to detect whether a
video clip contains an instance of a specific event [Awad et al. 2016, Over
et al. 2015, Over et al. 2014]. Specifically, based on the released TRECVID
MED dataset each year, each participant is required to provide for each
testing video the confidence score of how likely one particular event is
to happen in the video. Twenty pre-specified events are used each year,
and this task adopts the metrics of average precision (AP) and inferred
AP for event detection. Each event was also complemented with an event
kit, i.e., the textual description of the event as well as the potentially useful information about related concepts that are likely contained in the
event.
ActivityNet Large Scale Activity Recognition Challenge was first organized as
a workshop in 2016 [Heilbron et al. 2015]. This challenge is based on the
ActivityNet dataset [Heilbron et al. 2015], with the aim of recognizing highlevel and goal-oriented activities. By using 203 activity categories, there are
two tasks in this challenge: (1) Untrimmed Classification Challenge, and
(2) Detection Challenge, which is to predict the labels and temporal extents
of the activities present in videos.
1.5.1.3
Results of Existing Methods
Some of the datasets introduced above have been popularly adopted in the literature. We summarize the results of several recent approaches on UCF-101 and
HMDB51 in Table 1.2, where we can see the fast pace of development in this area.
Results on video classification are mostly measured by the AP (for a single class)
and mean AP (for multiple classes), which are not introduced in detail as they are
well known.
1.5.2 Captioning
A number of datasets have been proposed for video captioning; these commonly
contain videos that have each been paired with its corresponding sentences annotated by humans. This section summarizes the existing datasets and the adopted
evaluation metrics, followed by quantitative results of representative methods.
24
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
Table 1.2
Comparison of recent video classification methods on UCF-101 and HMDB51
datasets
Methods
Table 1.3
LRCN [Donahue et al. 2017]
82.9
—
LSTM-composite [Srivastava et al. 2015]
84.3
—
FST CN [Sun et al. 2015]
88.1
59.1
C3D [Tran et al. 2015]
86.7
—
Two-Stream [Simonyan and Zisserman 2014]
88.0
59.4
LSTM [Ng et al. 2015]
88.6
—
Image-Based [Zha et al. 2015]
89.6
—
Transformation CNN [Wang et al. 2016c]
92.4
63.4
Multi-Stream [Wu et al. 2016]
92.6
—
Key Volume Mining [Zhu et al. 2016]
92.7
67.2
Convolutional Two-Stream [Feichtenhofer et al. 2016]
93.5
69.2
Temporal Segment Networks [Wang et al. 2016b]
94.2
69.4
Comparison of video captioning benchmarks
Dataset
Context
MSVD
Multi-category
AMT workers
—
TV16-VTT
Multi-category
Humans
2,000
YouCook
Cooking
AMT workers
88
—
2,668
TACoS-ML
Cooking
AMT workers
273
14,105
52,593
Movie
DVS
92
48,986
55,905
94
68,337
68,375
653,467
7,180
10,000
200,000
1,856,523
M-VAD
MPII-MD
MSR-VTT-10K
1.5.2.1
UCF-101 HMDB51
Sentence Source #Videos
Movie
Script+DVS
20 categories
AMT workers
#Clips
1,970
—
#Sentences
70,028
4,000
#Words
607,339
—
42,457
—
519,933
Datasets
Table 1.3 summarizes key statistics and comparisons of popular datasets for video
captioning. Figure 1.8 shows a few examples from some of the datasets.
Microsoft Research Video Description Corpus (MSVD) contains 1,970
YouTube snippets collected on Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) by requesting workers to pick short clips depicting a single activity [Chen and Dolan
2011]. Annotators then label the video clips with single-sentence descrip-
1.5 Benchmarks and Challenges
(a) MSVD dataset
Sentences:
• A dog walks around on its front legs.
• The dog is doing a handstand.
• A pug is trying for balance walk on two legs.
Sentences:
• A man lights a match book on fire.
• A man playing with fire sticks.
• A man lights matches and yells.
(b) M-VAD dataset
Sentence:
• Later he drags someone through a jog.
Sentence:
• A waiter brings a pastry with a candle.
(c) MPII-MD dataset
Sentence:
• He places his hands around her waist as she
• opens her eyes.
Sentence:
• Someone’s car is stopped by a couple of
• uniformed police.
(d) MSR-VTT-10K dataset
Sentences:
• People practising volleyball in the play ground.
• A man is hitting a ball and he falls.
• A man is playing a football game on green land.
Figure 1.8
Sentences:
• A cat is hanging out in a bassinet with a baby.
• The cat is in the baby bed with the baby.
• A cat plays with a child in a crib.
Examples from (a) MSVD, (b) M-VAD, (c) MPII-MD, and (d) MSR-VTT-10K datasets.
25
26
Chapter 1 Deep Learning for Video Classification and Captioning
tions. The original corpus has multi-lingual descriptions, but only the English descriptions are commonly exploited on video captioning tasks. Specifically, there are roughly 40 available English descriptions per video and the
standard split of MSVD is 1,200 videos for training, 100 for validation, and
670 for testing, as suggested in Guadarrama et al. [2013].
YouCook dataset consists of 88 in-house cooking videos crawled from
YouTube and is roughly uniformly split into six different cooking styles, such
as baking and grilling [Das et al. 2013]. All the videos are in a third-person
viewpoint and in different kitchen environments. Each video is annotated
with multiple human descriptions by AMT. Each annotator in AMT is instructed to describe the video in at least three sentences totaling a minimum
of 15 words, resulting in 2,668 sentences for all the videos.
TACoS Multi-Level Corpus (TACoS-ML) is mainly built [Rohrbach et al. 2014]
based on MPII Cooking Activities dataset 2.0 [Rohrbach et al. 2015c], which
records different activities used when cooking. TACoS-ML consists of 185
long videos with text descriptions collected via AMT workers. Each AMT
worker annotates a sequence of temporal intervals across the long video,
pairing every interval with a single short sentence. There are 14,105 distinct
intervals and 52,593 sentences in total.
Montreal Video Annotation Dataset (M-VAD) is composed of about 49,000 DVD
movie snippets, which are extracted from 92 DVD movies [Torabi et al.
2015]. Each movie clip is accompanied by one single sentence from semiautomatically transcribed descriptive video service (DVS) narrations. The fact
that movies always contain a high diversity of visual and textual content, and
that there is only one single reference sentence for each movie clip, has made
the video captioning task on the M-VAD dataset very challenging.
MPII Movie Description Corpus (MPII-MD) is another collection of movie descriptions dataset that is similar to M-VAD [Rohrbach et al. 2015b]. It contains around 68,000 movie snippets from 94 Hollywood movies and each
snippet is labeled with one single sentence from movie scripts and DVS.
MSR Video to Text (MSR-VTT-10K) is a recent large-scale benchmark for video
captioning that contains 10K Web video clips totalling 41.2 hours, covering
the most comprehensive 20 categories obtained from a commercial video
1.5 Benchmarks and Challenges
27
search engine, e.g., music, people, gaming, sports, and TV shows [Xu et al.
2016]. Each clip is annotated with about 20 natural sentences by AMT workers. The training/validation/test split is provided by the authors with 6,513
clips for training, 2,990 for validation, and 497 for testing.
The TRECVID 2016 Video to Text Description (TV16-VTT) is another recent video
captioning dataset that consists of 2,000 videos randomly selected from
Twitter Vine videos [Awad et al. 2016]. Each video has a total duration of
about 6 seconds and is annotated with 2 sentences by humans. The human
annotators are asked to address four facets in the generated sentences: who
the video is describing (kinds of persons, animals, things) and what the
objects and beings are doing, plus where it is taking place and when.
1.5.2.2
Evaluation Metrics
For quantitative evaluation of the video captioning task, three metrics are commonly adopted: BLEU@N [Papineni et al. 2002], METEOR [Banerjee and Lavie
2005], and CIDEr [Vedantam et al. 2015]. Specifically, BLEU@N is a popular machine translation metric which measures the fraction of N-gram (up to 4-gram)
in common between a hypothesis and a reference or set of references. However,
as pointed out in Chen et al. [2015], the N-gram matches for a high N (e.g., 4)
rarely occur at a sentence level, resulting in poor performance of BLEU@N especially when comparing individual sentences. Hence, a more effective evaluation
metric, METEOR, utilized along with BLEU@N , is also widely used in natural
language processing (NLP) community. Unlike BLEU@N, METEOR computes unigram precision and recall, extending exact word matches to include similar words
based on WordNet synonyms and stemmed tokens. Another important metric for
image/video captioning is CIDEr, which measures consensus in image/video captioning by performing a Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF)
weighting for each N-gram.
1.5.2.3
Results of Existing Methods
Most popular methods of video captioning have been evaluated on MSVD [Chen
and Dolan 2011], M-VAD [Torabi et al. 2015], MPII-MD [Rohrbach et al. 2015b], and
TACoS-ML [Rohrbach et al. 2014] datasets. We summarize the results on these four
datasets in Tables 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6. As can be seen, most of the works are very recent, indicating that video captioning is an emerging and fast-developing research
topic.
Table 1.4
Reported results on the MSVD dataset, where B@N , M, and C are short for
BLEU@N , METEOR, and CIDEr-D scores, respectively
Methods
B@1
B@2
B@3
B@4
M
C
FGM [Thomason et al. 2014]
—
—
—
13.7
23.9
—
LSTM-YT [Venugopalan et al. 2015b]
—
—
—
33.3
29.1
—
MM-VDN [Xu et al. 2015a]
—
—
—
37.6
29.0
—
S2VT [Venugopalan et al. 2015a]
—
—
—
—
29.8
—
S2FT [Liu and Shi 2016]
—
—
—
—
29.9
—
80.0
64.7
52.6
41.9
29.6
51.7
—
—
—
42.1
31.4
—
78.8
66.0
55.4
45.3
31.0
—
SA [Yao et al. 2015a]
Glove+Deep Fusion [Venugopalan et al. 2016]
LSTM-E [Pan et al. 2016b]
GRU-RCN [Ballas et al. 2016]
h-RNN [Yu et al. 2016]
—
—
—
43.3
31.6
68.0
81.5
70.4
60.4
49.9
32.6
65.8
All values are reported as percentages (%).
Table 1.5
Reported results on (a) M-VAD and (b) MPII-MD
datasets, where M is short for METEOR
M-VAD dataset
Methods
M
SA [Yao et al. 2015a]
4.3
Mean Pool [Venugopalan et al. 2015a]
6.1
Visual-Labels [Rohrbach et al. 2015a]
6.4
S2VT [Venugopalan et al. 2015a]
6.7
Glove+Deep Fusion [Venugopalan et al. 2016]
6.8
LSTM-E [Pan et al. 2016b]
6.7
MPII-MD dataset
Methods
M
SMT [Rohrbach et al. 2015b]
5.6
Mean Pool [Venugopalan et al. 2015a]
6.7
Visual-Labels [Rohrbach et al. 2015a]
7.0
S2VT [Venugopalan et al. 2015a]
7.1
Glove+Deep Fusion [Venugopalan et al. 2016]
6.8
LSTM-E [Pan et al. 2016b]
7.3
All values are reported as percentages (%).
1.6 Conclusion
Table 1.6
29
Reported results on the TACoS-ML dataset, where B@N , M, and C are short
for BLEU@N , METEOR, and CIDEr-D scores, respectively
Methods
B@1
B@2
B@3
B@4
M
C
CRF-T [Rohrbach et al. 2013]
56.4
44.7
33.2
25.3
26.0
124.8
CRF-M [Rohrbach et al. 2014]
58.4
46.7
35.2
27.3
27.2
134.7
LRCN [Donahue et al. 2017]
59.3
48.2
37.0
29.2
28.2
153.4
h-RNN [Yu et al. 2016]
60.8
49.6
38.5
30.5
28.7
160.2
All values are reported as percentages (%).
1.6
Conclusion
In this chapter, we have reviewed state-of-the-art deep learning techniques on two
key topics related to video analysis, video classification and video captioning, both
of which rely on the modeling of the abundant spatial and temporal information in
videos. In contrast to hand crafted features that are costly to design and have limited generalization capability, the essence of deep learning for video classification is
to derive robust and discriminative feature representations from raw data through
exploiting massive videos with an aim to achieve effective and efficient recognition, which could hence serve as a fundamental component in video captioning.
Video captioning, on the other hand, focuses on bridging visual understanding
and language description by joint modeling. We also provided a review of popular benchmarks and challenges for both video classification and captioning tasks.
Though extensive efforts have been made in video classification and captioning
with deep learning, we believe we are just beginning to unleash the power of deep
learning in the big video data era. Given the substantial amounts of videos generated at an astounding speed every hour and every day, it remains a challenging open
problem how to derive better video representations with deep learning modeling
the abundant interactions of objects and their evolution over time with limited (or
without any) supervisory signals to facilitate video content understanding (i.e., the
recognition of human activities and events as well as the generation of free-form
and open-vocabulary sentences for describing videos). We hope this chapter sheds
light on the nuts and bolts of video classification and captioning for both current
and new researchers.
Bibliography
M. Abadi, R. Subramanian, S. Kia, P. Avesani, I. Patras, and N. Sebe. 2015. DECAF:
MEG-based multimodal database for decoding affective physiological responses.
IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 6(3): 209–222. DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2015
.2392932. 221, 238, 240, 249
A. E. Abdel-Hakim and A. A. Farag. 2006. CSIFT: A SIFT descriptor with color invariant
characteristics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer
Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), vol. 2, pp. 1978–1983. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2006
.95. 234
E. Abdulin and O. Komogortsev. 2015. User eye fatigue detection via eye movement behavior.
In CHI Extended Abstracts, pp. 1265–1270. DOI: 10.1145/2702613.2732812. 250
E. Adam. 1993. Fighter cockpits of the future. In Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1993.
12th DASC., AIAA/IEEE, pp. 318–323. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/DASC.1993.283529. 165, 167
A. Adelsbach and A.-R. Sadeghi. 2001. Zero-knowledge watermark detection and proof of
ownership. In Information Hiding, volume 2137 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pp. 273–288. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45496-9_20. 81
A. Adi and O. Etzion. 2004. Amit—the situation manager. The VLDB Journal—The International
Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 13(2): 177–203. DOI: 10.1007/s00778-003-0108-y.
165
C. Aggarwal, J. H. Jiawei, and J. W. P. S. Yu. 2003. A framework for clustering evolving data
streams. In Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 29th International Conference on Very
Large Data Bases, volume 29, pp. 81–92. 97, 98
C. Aggarwal, D. Olshefski, D. Saha, Z.-Y. Shae, and P. Yu. 2005. CSR: Speaker recognition
from compressed VoIP packet stream. In IEEE International Conference on Multimedia
and Expo, pp. 970–973. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2005.1521586. 97, 98
J. K. Aggarwal and M. S. Ryoo. 2011. Human activity analysis: A review. ACM Computing
Surveys, 43(3): April 2011. DOI: 10.1145/1922649.1922653. 4
A. Aghasaryan, M. Bouzid, D. Kostadinov, M. Kothari, and A. Nandi. July 2013. On the use of
LSH for privacy preserving personalization. In IEEE International Conference on Trust,
Security, and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom), pp. 362–371.
DOI: 10.1109/TrustCom.2013.46. 105
316
Bibliography
E. Agichtein, E. Brill, S. Dumais, and R. Ragno. 2006. Learning user interaction models
for predicting web search result preferences. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval, pp. 3–10. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1148170.1148175. 147
E. Agrell, T. Eriksson, A. Vardy, and K. Zeger. 2002. Closest point search in lattices. IEEE
Trans. Inform. Theory, 48(8): 2201–2214. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2002.800499. 115
M. Aguilar, C. XLIM, S. Fau, C. Fontaine, G. Gogniat, and R. Sirdey. 2013. Recent advances in
homomorphic encryption: A possible future for signal processing in the encrypted
domain. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(2): 108–117. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2012
.2230219. 77
N. Ahituv, Y. Lapid, and S. Neumann. 1987. Processing encrypted data. Communications of
the ACM, 30(9): 777–780. DOI: 10.1145/30401.30404. 78, 84
L. Ai, J. Yu, Z. Wu, Y. He, and T. Guan. 2015. Optimized residual vector quantization
for efficient approximate nearest neighbor search. Multimedia Systems, pp. 1–13.
DOI: 10.1007/s00530-015-0470-9. 131
X. Alameda-Pineda and R. Horaud. 2015. Vision-guided robot hearing. International Journal
of Robotics Research, 34(4–5): 437–456. DOI: 10.1177/0278364914548050. 55
X. Alameda-Pineda, J. Sanchez-Riera, J. Wienke, V. Franc, J. Cech, K. Kulkarni, A. Deleforge,
and R. Horaud. 2013. Ravel: An annotated corpus for training robots with audiovisual
abilities. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 7(1–2): 79–91. DOI: 10.1007/s12193012-0111-y. 55
X. Alameda-Pineda, Y. Yan, E. Ricci, O. Lanz, and N. Sebe. 2015. Analyzing free-standing
conversational groups: A multimodal approach. In ACM International Conference on
Multimedia (ACMMM), pp. 4–15. DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806238. 55, 56, 61
X. Alameda-Pineda, E. Ricci, Y. Yan, and N. Sebe. 2016a. Recognizing emotions from abstract
paintings using non-linear matrix completion. In CVPR. 58
X. Alameda-Pineda, J. Staiano, R. Subramanian, L. Batrinca, E. Ricci, B. Lepri, O. Lanz,
and N. Sebe. 2016b. SALSA: A novel dataset for multimodal group behavior analysis.
IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, (IEEE TPAMI), 38(8): 1707–1720.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2496269. 56, 66, 238
M. Alhamad, T. Dillon, and E. Chang. 2010. SLA-based trust model for cloud computing.
In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems
(NBiS), pp. 321–324. DOI: 10.1109/NBiS.2010.67. 260
Y. Aloimonos, A. K. Mishra, L. F. Cheong, and A. Kassim. 2012. Active visual segmentation.
IEEE PAMI, 34: 639–653. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.171. 220
D. Anderson. 2004. BOINC: A system for public-resource computing and storage. In
Proceedings of IEEE/ACM Grid Computing (GC), pp. 4–10. DOI: 10.1109/GRID.2004.14.
258, 261
Bibliography
317
D. Anderson, J. Cobb, E. Korpela, M. Lebofsky, and D. Werthimer. 2002. SETI@home: An
experiment in public-resource computing. ACM Transactions on Communications,
45(11): 56–61. DOI: 10.1145/581571.581573. 258
N. Anderson, W. F. Bischof, K. E. Laidlaw, E. F. Risko, and A. Kingstone. 2013. Recurrence
quantification analysis of eye movements. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3): 842–856.
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0299-5. 229
A. Andoni. Nov. 2009. Nearest Neighbor Search: The Old, the New, and the Impossible. PhD
thesis, MIT. 108, 113, 115
A. Andoni and P. Indyk. 2006. Near-optimal hashing algorithms for near neighbor problem
in high dimensions. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Computer
Science, pp. 459–468. DOI: 10.1109/FOCS.2006.49. 105, 112, 115, 117
P. André, E. Cutrell, D. S. Tan, and G. Smith. 2009. Designing novel image search interfaces
by understanding unique characteristics and usage. In IFIP Conference on HumanComputer Interaction, pp. 340–353. Springer. 148
M. Andriluka, L. Pishchulin, P. Gehler, and B. Schiele. 2014. 2D human pose estimation: New benchmark and state of the art analysis. In CVPR, pp. 3686–3693.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.471. 22
S. Argamon, S. Dhawle, M. Koppel, and J. Pennbaker. 2005. Lexical predictors of personality
type. In Interface and the Classification Society of North America. DOI: 10.1.1.60.6697.
238
V. Athitsos, J. Alon, S. Sclaroff, and G. Kollios. Jan. 2008. BoostMap: An embedding
method for efficient nearest neighbor retrieval. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 30(1): 89–104.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1140. 133
S. Avidan and M. Butman. 2006. Blind vision. In Proceedings of the 9th European Conference
on Computer Vision, volume 3953 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–13.
Springer. DOI: 10.1007/11744078_1. 82, 91, 93
G. Awad, J. Fiscus, M. Michel, D. Joy, W. Kraaij, A. F. Smeaton, G. Quenot, M. Eskevich, R. Aly,
G. J. F. Jones, R. Ordelman, B. Huet, and M. Larson. 2016. TRECVID 2016: Evaluating
video search, video event detection, localization, and hyperlinking. In Proceedings of
TRECVID 2016, pp. 407–411. 23, 27
S. Ba, X. Alameda-Pineda, A. Xompero, and R. Horaud. 2016. An on-line variational Bayesian
model for multi-person tracking from cluttered scenes. In Computer Vision and
Human Understanding (CVHU) 153:64–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2015.07.006. 52, 55
O. Babaoglu, M. Marzolla, and M. Tamburini. 2012. Design and implementation of a
P2P cloud system. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC),
pp. 412–417. DOI: 10.1145/2245276.2245357. 259
A. Babenko and V. Lempitsky. June 2014. Additive quantization for extreme vector
compression. In CVPR. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.124. 131
A. Babenko and V. Lempitsky. June 2015a. The inverted multi-index. In IEEE TPAMI, 37(6):
1247–1260. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248038. 132
318
Bibliography
A. Babenko and V. Lempitsky. June 2015b. Tree quantization for large-scale similarity search
and classification. In CVPR. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299052. 131
A. Babenko, A. Slesarev, A. Chigorin, and V. Lempitsky. September 2014. Neural codes for
image retrieval. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV),
pp. 584–599. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_38. 107
M. Backes, G. Doychev, M. Dürmuth, and B. Köpf. 2010. Speaker recognition in encrypted
voice streams. In Computer Security—ESORICS, volume 6345 of Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, pp. 508–523. Springer. 98, 100
A. Baddeley and R. Turner. 2000. Practical maximum pseudolikelihood for spatial
point patterns. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics, 42: 283–322.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-842X.00128. 208
S. Bahmani and B. Raj. 2013. A unifying analysis of projected gradient descent for pconstrained least squares. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 34(3):
366–378. DOI: 10.1016/j.acha.2012.07.004. 39
S. Bahmani, P. Boufounos, and B. Raj. 2011. Greedy sparsity-constrained optimization.
In Proceedings 45th IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers
(ASILOMAR), pp. 1148–1152. 39
S. Bahmani, B. Raj, and P. Boufounos. 2016. Learning model-based sparsity via projected
gradient descent. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 62(4): 2092–2099.
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2016.2515078. 39
N. Ballas, L. Yao, C. Pal, and A. Courville. 2016. Delving deeper into convolutional networks
for learning video representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Learning Representations (ICLR). arXiv:1511.06432, 2015. 14, 28
T. Baltrušaitis, P. Robinson, and L.-P. Morency. 2016. OpenFace: an open source facial
behavior analysis toolkit. In IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer
Vision, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477553. 225
R. Balu, T. Furon, and H. Jégou. April 2014. Beyond project and sign for distance estimation
with binary codes. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and
Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 6884–6888. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854934. 123,
127
S. Banerjee and A. Lavie. 2005. METEOR: An automatic metric for MT evaluation with
improved correlation with human judgments. In Proceedings of the ACL Workshop
on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Evaluation Measures for Machine Translation and/or
Summarization, pp. 65-72. 27
K. Baokye, B. Trueba-Hornero, O. Vinyals, and G. Friedland. 2008a. Overlapped speech
detection for improved diarization in multiparty meetings. In ICASSP, pp. 4353–
4356. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518619. 36
K. Baokye, O. Vinyals, and G. Friedland. 2008b. Two’s a crowd: Improving speaker diarization
by automatically identifying and excluding overlapped speech. In Proceedings of
Interspeech, pp. 32–35. 36
Bibliography
319
R. Bardeli, D. Wolff, F. Kurth, M. Koch, K.-H. Tauchert, and K.-H. Frommolt. 2010. Detecting
bird sounds in a complex acoustic environment and application to bioacoustic
monitoring. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(12): 1524–1534. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec
.2009.09.014. 38
M. Barni and A. Piva. 2008. Co-chairs, special issue on signal processing in the encrypted
domain. Proceedings of EURASIP European Signal Processing Conference. 77
M. Barni, T. Bianchi, D. Catalano, M. Di Raimondo, R. D. Labati, P. Failla, D. Fiore,
R. Lazzeretti, V. Piuri, A. Piva, and F. Scotti. 2010. A privacy-compliant fingerprint
recognition system based on homomorphic encryption and fingercode templates.
In 4th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics: Theory Applications and Systems,
pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634527. 82
M. Barni, P. Failla, R. Lazzeretti, A. R. Sadeghi, and T. Schneider. 2011. Privacy-preserving
ECG classification with branching programs and neural networks. IEEE Transactions
on Information Forensics and Security, 6(2): 452–468. DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2108650.
83
R. Barthes. 1981. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Macmillan. 187
J. Barwise and J. Perry. 1980. The situation underground. Stanford Working Papers in
Semantics, 1: 1–55. 165, 167
J. Barwise and J. Perry. 1981. Situations and attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 78(11):
668–691. DOI: 10.2307/2026573. 165
R. Bayer and E. M. McCreight. July 1970. Organization and maintenance of large ordered
indices. Mathematical and Information Sciences Report 20, Boeing Scientific
Research Laboratories. DOI: 10.1145/1734663.1734671. 107
M. Bebbington and D. S. Harte. 2001. On the statistics of the linked stress release model.
Journal of Applied Probability, 38(A): 176–187. DOI: 10.1017/S0021900200112768. 208
J. S. Beis and D. G. Lowe. June 1997. Shape indexing using approximate nearest-neighbour
search in high-dimensional spaces. In CVPR. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.1997.609451. 105,
107, 118
A. J. Bell and T. J. Sejnowski. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind
separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7(6): 1129–1159.
citeseer.nj.nec.com/bell95informationmaximization.html. 36
A. Beloglazov, J. Abawajy, and R. Buyya. 2012. Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics
for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Generation
Computer Systems, 28(5): 755–768. DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2011.04.017. 259
J. Benaloh. 1994. Dense probabilistic encryption. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Selected
Areas of Cryptography, pp. 120–128. 81
B. Benfold and I. Reid. 2011. Unsupervised learning of a scene-specific coarse gaze estimator.
In Proceedings of IEEE Internationa Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2344–
2351. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126516. 57
320
Bibliography
Y. Bengio, P. Simard, and P. Frasconi. 1994. Learning long-term dependencies with gradient
descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks (TNN), 5(2): 157–166.
DOI: 10.1109/72.279181. 7
Y. Bengio, A. Courville, and P. Vincent. 2013. Representation learning: A review and new
perspectives. IEEE TPAMI, pp. 1798–1828. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50. 6
C. J. Bennett. 2008. The Privacy Advocates: Resisting the Spread of Surveillance. MIT Press. 91
W. Bennett. July 1948. Spectra of quantized signals. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):
1–43. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01340.x. 117
A. Berenzweig, B. Logan, D. P. W. Ellis, and B. Whitman. June 2004. A large-scale evaluation
of acoustic and subjective music-similarity measures. Computer Music Journal,
28(2): 63–76. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/pubs/BerenLEW04-museval.pdf.
DOI: 10.1162/014892604323112257. 38
T. Bertin-Mahieux and D. P. W. Ellis. Oct. 2011. Large-scale cover song recognition using
hashed chroma landmarks. In Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal
Proceedings to Audio and Acoustics, pp. 117–120. DOI: 10.7916/D8J67S98. 38
T. Bianchi, A. Piva, and M. Barni. 2008a. Efficient pointwise and blockwise encrypted
operations. In Proceedings of the ACM 10th Workshop on Multimedia and Security,
pp. 85–90. DOI: 10.1145/1411328.1411344. 79, 80
T. Bianchi, A. Piva, and M. Barni. 2008b. Comparison of different FFT implementations
in the encrypted domain. In Proceedings of EUSIPCO 16th European Signal Processing
Conference, pp. 1–5. 80
T. Bianchi, A. Piva, and M. Barni. 2008c. Implementing the discrete Fourier transform in the
encrypted domain. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, pp. 1757–1760. 80
T. Bianchi, A. Piva, and M. Barni. 2009a. Efficient linear filtering of encrypted signals via
composite representation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 16th International Conference on
Digital Signal Processing, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICDSP.2009.5201116. 80
T. Bianchi, T. Veugen, A. Piva, and M. Barni. 2009b. Processing in the encrypted domain
using a composite signal representation: PROS and CONS. In Proceedings of the
IEEE 1st International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, pp. 176–180.
DOI: 10.1109/WIFS.2009.5386460. 76, 77, 79, 80
T. Bianchi, S. Turchi, A. Piva, R. D. Labati, V. Piuri, and F. Scotti. 2010. Implementing
fingercode-based identity matching in the encrypted domain. In I EEE Workshop on
Biometric Measurements and Systems for Security and Medical Applications, pp. 15–21.
DOI: 10.1109/BIOMS.2010.5610445. 77, 82
H. Bilen, B. Fernando, E. Gavves, A. Vedaldi, and S. Gould. 2016. Dynamic image networks
for action recognition. In CVPR, pp. 3034–3042. 12
D. Bitouk, N. Kumar, S. Dhillon, P. Belhumeur, and S. Nayar. 2008. Face swapping:
automatically replacing faces in photographs. In ACM Transactions on Graphics,
volume 27, p. 39. DOI: 10.1145/1399504.1360638. 92, 93
Bibliography
321
M. Blank, L. Gorelick, E. Shechtman, M. Irani, and R. Basri. 2005. Actions as space-time
shapes. In ICCV. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.70711. 20
D. Bogdanov, 2007. Foundations and properties of Shamir’s secret sharing scheme. Research
Seminar in Cryptography. 88
F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, and S. Addepalli. 2012. Fog computing and its role in the
Internet of Things. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing
(MCC), pp. 13–16. DOI: 10.1145/2342509.2342513. 256
D. Borth, R. Ji, T. Chen, T. Breuel, and S.-F. Chang. 2013. Large-scale visual sentiment
ontology and detectors using adjective noun pairs. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 223–232. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2502081
.2502282. 150
P. T. Boufounos. March 2012. Universal rate-efficient scalar quantization. IEEE Trans. Inform.
Theory, 58(3): 1861–1872. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2011.2173899. 122
P. T. Boufounos and R. G. Baraniuk. March 2008. 1-bit compressive sensing. In Proceedings
Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS), pp. 16–21. DOI: 10.1109/CISS
.2008.4558487. 121
T. E. Boult. 2005. Pico: Privacy through invertible cryptographic obscuration. In Proceedings
of IEEE Computer Vision for Interactive and Intelligent Environment, pp. 27–38.
DOI: 10.1109/CVIIE.2005.16. 91
A. Bourrier, F. Perronnin, R. Gribonval, P. Pérez, and H. Jégou. 2015. Nearest neighbor search
for arbitrary kernels with explicit embeddings. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and
Vision, 52(3): 459–468. 133
S. Boyd, N. Parikh, E. Chu, B. Peleato, and J. Eckstein. 2011. Distributed optimization and
statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations
and Trends in Machine Learning, 3(1): 1–122. DOI: 10.1561/2200000016. 63, 64
G. Bradski and A. Kaehler. 2008. Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the OpenCV Library.
O’Reilly Media. 179
Z. Brakerski, C. Gentry, and V. Vaikuntanathan. 2012. (Leveled) fully homomorphic
encryption without bootstrapping. In Proceedings of 3rd ACM Innovations in
Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 309–325. DOI: 10.1145/2090236
.2090262. 101, 102
J. Brandt. June 2010. Transform coding for fast approximate nearest neighbor search in
high dimensions. In CVPR, pp. 1815–1822. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539852. 128
O. Brdiczka, P. Yuen, S. Zaidenberg, P. Reignier, and J. Crowley. 2006. Automatic acquisition
of context models and its application to video surveillance. In 18th International
Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2006 (ICPR), volume 1, pp. 1175–1178. IEEE. DOI:
10.1109/ICPR.2006.292. 165
P. Brémaud and L. Massoulié. 1996. Stability of nonlinear Hawkes processes. The Annals of
Probability, 24(3): 1563–1588. DOI: 10.1214/aop/1065725193. 200
322
Bibliography
J. Bringer, H. Chabanne, M. Favre, A. Patey, T. Schneider, and M. Zohner. 2014. GSHADE:
Faster privacy-preserving distance computation and biometric identification. In
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security,
pp. 187–198. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600918.2600922. 82
A. Z. Broder. June 1997. On the resemblance and containment of documents. In Proceedings
Compression and Complexity of Sequences, p. 21. DOI: 10.1109/SEQUEN.1997.666900.
120
G. J. Brown and M. P. Cooke. 1994. Computational auditory scene analysis. Computer Speech
and Language, 8: 297–336. DOI: 10.1006/csla.1994.1016. 36, 37
A. Bujari, M. Massaro, and C. E. Palazzi. Dec. 2015. Vegas over access point: Making room
for thin client game systems in a wireless home. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems for Video Technology, 25(12): 2002–2012. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2015.2450332.
309
R. Buyya, S. Garg, and R. Calheiros. 2011. SLA-oriented resource provisioning for cloud
computing: Challenges. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud and
Service Computing (CSC), pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1109/CSC.2011.6138522. 259
R. Cabral, F. De la Torre, J. Costeira, and A. Bernardino. 2014. Matrix completion for
multi-label image classification. IEEE TPAMI, 37(1): 121–135. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI
.2014.2343234. 58, 60
W. Cai, M. Chen, and V. C. M. Leung. May 2014. Toward gaming as a service. IEEE
Internet Computing, 18(3): 12–18. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper
.htm?arnumber=6818918. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2014.22. 290, 291
W. Cai, R. Shea, C.-Y. Huang, K.-T. Chen, J. Liu, V. C. M. Leung, and C.-H. Hsu.
April 2016a. The future of cloud gaming. Proceedings of IEEE, 104(4): 687–691.
DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2016.2539418. 304
W. Cai, R. Shea, C.-Y. Huang, K.-T. Chen, J. Liu, V. C. M. Leung, and C.-H. Hsu. Jan.
2016b. A survey on cloud gaming: Future of computer games. IEEE Access, pp. 1–25.
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2590500. 289, 291
A. T. Campbell, S. B. Eisenman, N. D. Lane, E. Miluzzo, and R. A. Peterson. 2006.
People-centric urban sensing. In Int. Work. on Wireless Internet, article 18.
DOI: 10.1145/1234161.1234179. 55
E. J. Candès and T. Tao. 2010. The power of convex relaxation: Near-optimal matrix
completion. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 56(5): 2053–2080. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.2010
.2044061. 61
J. Canny. 2002. Collaborative filtering with privacy. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on
Security and Privacy, pp. 45–57. DOI: 10.1145/564376.564419. 82
C. Canton-Ferrer, C. Segura, J. R. Casas, M. Pardas, and J. Hernando. 2008. Audiovisual head
orientation estimation with particle filtering in multisensor scenarios. EURASIP
Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, article 32. 57
Bibliography
323
J. Cao, Y.-D. Zhang, Y.-C. Song, Z.-N. Chen, X. Zhang, and J.-T. Li. 2009. MCG-WEBV: A
benchmark dataset for web video analysis. Technical Report, CAS Institute of Computing
Technology, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2008/276846. 21
N. Carrier, T. Deutsch, C. Gruber, M. Heid, and L. Jarrett. Aug. 2008. The business case for
enterprise mashups. IBM White Paper. 171
M. Casey and M. Slaney. April 2007. Fast recognition of remixed music audio. In ICASSP,
volume 4, pp. 1425–1428. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2007.367347. 105
C. Castelluccia, A. Chan, E. Mykletun, and G. Tsudik. 2009. Efficient and provably secure
aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on
Sensor Networks, 5(3): 20. 103
S. Chachada and C.-C. J. Kuo. 2014. Environmental sound recognition: A survey. APSIPA
Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 3. ISSN 2048-7703. http://journals
.cambridge.org/article_S2048770314000122. DOI: 10.1017/ATSIP.2014.12. 38
S.-F. Chang. 2013. How far we’ve come: Impact of 20 years of multimedia information
retrieval. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and
Applications (TOMCCAP), 9(1s): 42. DOI: 10.1109/CCGRID.2010.132. 151, 155
V. Chang, D. Bacigalupo, G. Wills, and D. Roure. 2010. Categorisation of cloud computing
business models. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster,
Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), pp. 509–512. DOI: 10.1145/2491844. 259
Y.-C. Chang, K.-T. Chen, C.-C. Wu, and C.-L. Lei. 2008. Inferring speech activity from
encrypted Skype traffic. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference,
pp. 1–5. 97, 98
Y.-C. Chang, P.-H. Tseng, K.-T. Chen, and C.-L. Lei. May 2011. Understanding the
performance of thin-client gaming. In Proceedings of IEEE Communications Quality
and Reliability (CQR) 2011, pp. 1—6. DOI: 10.1109/CQR.2011.5996092. 291
M. S. Charikar. May 2002. Similarity estimation techniques from rounding algorithms. In
(Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp.
380–388. DOI: 10.1145/509907.509965. 105, 110, 112, 120, 121, 123, 133
A. Chattopadhyay and T. E. Boult. 2007. PrivacyCam: A privacy preserving camera using
uCLinux on the Blackfin DSP. In Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision
and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383413. 91, 93
S. Chaudhuri. 2013. Structured Models for Semantic Analysis of Audio Content. PhD thesis,
Carnegie Mellon University. 46, 47
S. Chaudhuri and B. Raj. 2011. Learning contextual relevance of audio segments using
discriminative models over AUD sequences. In IEEE Workshop on Applications of
Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA), pp. 197–200. DOI: 10.1109/ASPAA
.2011.6082335. 39
S. Chaudhuri and B. Raj. 2012. Unsupervised structure discovery for semantic analysis of
audio. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2:1178–1186.
39, 46, 47
324
Bibliography
S. Chaudhuri, M. Harvilla, and B. Raj. 2011. Unsupervised learning of acoustic unit
descriptors for audio content representation and classification. In Proceedings of
Interspeech, pp. 2265–2268. 39
S. Chaudhuri, R. Singh, and B. Raj. 2012. Exploiting temporal sequence structure for
semantic analysis of multimedia. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 2:1726–1729. 39, 46,
47
C. Chen and J.-M. Odobez. 2012. We are not contortionists: Coupled adaptive learning for
head and body orientation estimation in surveillance video. In CVPR, pp. 1544–1551.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247845. 53, 57, 58, 62, 68, 70, 71
D. L. Chen and W. B. Dolan. 2011. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In
Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics
(ACL), pp. 190–200. 24, 27
K.-T. Chen, Y.-C. Chang, P.-H. Tseng, C.-Y. Huang, and C.-L. Lei. Nov. 2011. Measuring the
latency of cloud gaming systems. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2011, pp. 1269–
1272. DOI: 10.1145/2072298.2071991. 291, 292
K.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, and C.-H. Hsu. 2014. Cloud gaming onward: Research opportunities
and outlook. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and
Expo (ICME2014), pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ICMEW.2014.6890683. 290, 291
X. Chen, H. Fang, T.-Y. Lin, R. Vedantam, S. Gupta, P. Dollár, and C. L. Zitnick. 2015.
Microsoft COCO captions: Data collection and evaluation server. arXiv:1504.00325.
27
Y. Chen, T. Guan, and C. Wang. 2010. Approximate nearest neighbor search by residual
vector quantization. Sensors, 10(12): 11259–11273. DOI: 10.3390/s101211259. 131
G. Chéron, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. 2015. P-CNN: Pose-based CNN features for action
recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision,
pp. 3218–3226. arXiv:1506.03607 [cs.CV] 53
Y. W. Ching and P. C. Su. 2009. A region of interest rate-control scheme for encoding
traffic surveillance videos. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Intelligent
Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 194–197. DOI: 10.1109/IIHMSP.2009.114. 92
J. Choi, H. Lei, and G. Friedland. September 2011. The 2011 ICSI video location estimation
system. Proceedings of MediaEval 2011. http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/pubs/speech
/icsivideolocation11.pdf 39
T. Choudhury and A. Pentland. 2003. Sensing and modeling human networks using the
sociometer. In Inter. Sym. on Wearable Comp., p. 216. DOI: 10.1109/ISWC.2003
.1241414. 53
K.-Y. Chu, Y.-H. Kuo, and W. H. Hsu. 2013. Real-time privacy-preserving moving object
detection in the cloud. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on
Multimedia, pp. 597–600. 94, 96
Bibliography
325
W.-T. Chu and F.-C. Chang. 2015. A privacy-preserving bipartite graph matching framework
for multimedia analysis and retrieval. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International
Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, pp. 243–250. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2671188
.2749286. 86, 90
S.-P. Chuah, C. Yuen, and N.-M. Cheung. 2014. Cloud gaming: A green solution to
massive multiplayer online games. IEEE Wireless Communications (August): 78–87.
DOI: 10.1109/MWC.2014.6882299. 290, 291, 308
M. Claypool and K. Claypool. 2006. Latency and player actions in online games. ACM
Communications 49(11): 40–45. DOI: 10.1145/1167838.1167860. 256, 302
J. Conway and N. Sloane. 1982a. Fast quantizing and decoding algorithms for lattice
quantizers and codes. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2): 227–232.
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056484. 115
J. Conway and N. Sloane. 1982b. Voronoi regions of lattices, second moments of
polytopes, and quantization. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28(2): 211–226.
DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1982.1056483. 115
J. Conway and N. Sloane. 1990. Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups, third ed. Springer.
ISBN:0-387-96617-X 128
M. Cooke, J. Barker, S. Cunningham, and X. Shao. 2006. An audio-visual corpus for speech
perception and automatic speech recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 120: 2421. DOI: 10.1121/1.2229005. 37
P. T. Costa and R. R. McCrae. 1980. Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective
well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
38(4): 668. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668. 244
P. T. J. Costa and R. R. McCrae. 1992. NEO-PI-R Professional Manual: Revised NEO Personality
and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI), volume 4. Psychological Assessment
Resources, Odessa, Florida. 237
I. Cox, J. Kilian, T. Leighton, and T. Shamoon. 1996. A secure, robust watermark for
multimedia. In Information Hiding, volume 1174 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pp. 185–206. Springer. ISBN:3-540-61996-8. 81
R. Cramer, R. Gennaro, and B. Schoenmakers. 1997. A secure and optimally efficient
multi-authority election scheme. Wiley Online Library, European Transactions on
Telecommunications, 8(5): 481–490. 81
M. Cristani, L. Bazzani, G. Paggetti, A. Fossati, A. Del Blue, G. Menegaz, and V. Murino. 2011.
Social interaction discovery by statistical analysis of F-formations. In British Machine
Vision Conference (BMVC), 2(4). DOI: 10.5244/C.25.23. 52, 57, 69, 70, 71
P. Cui, F. Wang, S. Liu, M. Ou, S. Yang, and L. Sun. 2011. Who should share what?: Itemlevel social influence prediction for users and posts ranking. In Proceedings of the
34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval, pp. 185–194. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2009916.2009945. 148
326
Bibliography
P. Cui, S.-W. Liu, W.-W. Zhu, H.-B. Luan, T.-S. Chua, and S.-Q. Yang. 2014a. Social-sensed
image search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 32(2): 8. DOI: 10.1145
/2590974. 148
P. Cui, Z. Wang, and Z. Su. 2014b. What videos are similar with you?: Learning a common
attributed representation for video recommendation. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 597–606. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2647868
.2654946. 140
N. Dalal and B. Triggs. 2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In
CVPR, pp. 886–893. 59
D. J. Daley and D. Vere-Jones. 2003. An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes, 2nd ed.
Springer-Verlag, New York. DOI: 10.1007/b97277. 193, 200, 206, 208, 209
I. Damgard and M. Jurik. 2001. A generalisation, a simplification and some applications of
Paillier’s probabilistic public-key system. In Proceeedings of 4th International Workshop
on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptosystems, volume 1992 of Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, pp. 119–136. Springer. 81, 96
Q. Danfeng, S. Gammeter, L. Bossard, T. Quack, and L. V. Gool. 2011. Hello neighbor:
Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors. In CVPR, pp. 777–784.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995373. 106
P. Das, C. Xu, R. F. Doell, and J. J. Corso. 2013. A thousand frames in just a few words:
Lingual description of videos through latent topics and sparse object stitching. In
CVPR, pp. 2634–2641. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.340. 26
A. Dassios and H. Zhao. 2011. A dynamic contagion process. Advances in Applied Probability,
pp. 814–846. DOI: 10.1239/aap/1316792671. 200
A. Dassios and H. Zhao. 2013. Exact simulation of Hawkes process with exponentially
decaying intensity. Electronic Communications in Probability, 18: 1–13. DOI: 10.1214
/ECP.v18-2717. 202, 204
M. Datar, N. Immorlica, P. Indyk, and V. Mirrokni. 2004. Locality-sensitive hashing scheme
based on p-stable distributions. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Computational
Geometry, pp. 253–262. DOI: 10.1145/997817.997857. 105, 108, 113, 114, 131
R. Datta, D. Joshi, J. Li, and J. Z. Wang. 2008. Image retrieval: Ideas, influences, and trends
of the new age. ACM Computing Surveys, 40(2): 5. DOI: 10.1145/1348246.1348248. 84,
86
M. de Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. H. Overmars, and O. Schwarzkopf. March 2008. Computational
Geometry: Algorithms and Applications, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag. 109
M. De Choudhury, Y.-R. Lin, H. Sundaram, K. S. Candan, L. Xie, and A. Kelliher. 2010. How
does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in
social media? Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and
Social Media (ICWSM), 10: 34–41. 144
F. De la Torre et al. 2009. Guide to the Carnegie Mellon University multimodal activity
(CMU-MMAC) database. Technical report. 57
Bibliography
327
Y.-A. de Montjoye, E. Shmueli, S. S. Wang, and A. S. Pentland. 2014a. openPDS: Protecting
the privacy of metadata through SafeAnswers. PloS ONE, 9(7): e98790. DOI: 10.1371
/journal.pone.0098790. 188
Y.-A. de Montjoye, A. Stopczynski, E. Shmueli, A. Pentland, and S. Lehmann. 2014b. The
strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving. Scientific Reports,
4:5277. DOI: 10.1038/srep05277. 186
Y.-A. de Montjoye, L. Radaelli, V. K. Singh, and A. S. Pentland. 2015. Unique in the shopping
mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science, 347(6221): 536–539.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1256297. 188
J. Dean and S. Ghemawat. 2008. MapReduce: Simplified data processing on large clusters.
Communications of the ACM, 51(1): 107–133. DOI: 10.1145/1327452.1327492. 279
A. Delvinioti, H. Jégou, L. Amsaleg, and M. Houle. January 2014. Image retrieval with
reciprocal and shared nearest neighbors. In Proceedings of the International Conference
on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), pp. 321–328. 106
M. Demirkus, D. Precup, J. J. Clark, and T. Arbel. 2014. Probabilistic temporal head
pose estimation using a hierarchical graphical model. In ECCV, pp. 328–344.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_22. 57
J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei. 2009. ImageNet: A large-scale
hierarchical image database. In CVPR. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206848. 9
S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke. 2011. From game design elements to
gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of ACM International Academic
MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek), pp. 9–15.
DOI: 10.1145/2181037.2181040. 261
S. Dey, C. Invited, and P. Paper. 2012. Cloud mobile media: Opportunities, challenges,
and directions. In 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and
Communications, ICNC’12, pp. 929–933. DOI: 10.1109/ICCNC.2012.6167561. 290, 291
D. Dietrich, W. Kastner, T. Maly, C. Roesener, G. Russ, and H. Schweinzer. 2004. Situation
modeling. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Factory
Communication Systems, pp. 93–102. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/WFCS.2004.1377687. 165,
167
T. G. Diettereich, R. H. Lathrop, and T. Lozano-Perez. 1998. Solving the multiple instance
problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence, 89:31–71. DOI: 10.1007
/3-540-45153-6_20. 48
M. V. Dijk, C. Gentry, S. Halevi, and V. Vaikuntanathan. 2010. Fully homomorphic encryption
over the integers. In Advances in Cryptology—EUROCRYPT, volume 6110 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pp. 24–43. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_2.
101
T. Dillon, C. Wu, and E. Chang. 2010. Cloud computing: Issues and challenges. In Proceedings
of IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications
(AINA), pp. 27–33. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13190-5_2. 259
328
Bibliography
P. Dimandis. 2012. Abundance is our future. In TED Conference. 162
N. Do, C. Hsu, and N. Venkatasubramanian. 2012. CrowdMAC: A crowdsourcing system
for mobile access. In Proceedings of ACM/IFIP/USENIX Middleware, pp. 1–20.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35170-9_1. 263, 264, 265
N. Do, Y. Zhao, C. Hsu, and N. Venkatasubramanian. 2016. Crowdsourced mobile data
transfer with delay bound. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 16(4):
1–29. DOI: 10.1145/2939376. 263, 264, 265, 267
T. M. T. Do and D. Gatica-Perez. 2013. Human interaction discovery in smartphone proximity
networks. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(3): 413–431. DOI: 10.1007/s00779011-0489-7. 55
C. Dominguez, M. Vidulich, E. Vogel, and G. McMillan. 1994. Situation awareness: Papers
and annotated bibliography. Armstrong Laboratory, Human System Center, ref.
Technical report, AL/CF-TR-1994-0085. 166, 167
J. Donahue, L. A. Hendricks, M. Rohrbach, S. Venugopalan, S. Guadarrama, K. Saenko, and
T. Darrell. 2017. Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition
and description. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,
39(4): 677–691 DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2599174. 12, 15, 16, 17, 24, 29
W. Dong, M. Charikar, and K. Li. July 2008a. Asymmetric distance estimation with sketches
for similarity search in high-dimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development (SIGIR), pp. 123–130.
DOI: 10.1145/1390334.1390358. 110, 122, 123
W. Dong, Z. Wang, W. Josephson, M. Charikar, and K. Li. October 2008b. Modeling LSH
for performance tuning. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Information and
Knowledge Management (CIKM), pp. 669–678. DOI: 10.1145/1458082.1458172. 115,
117
W. Dong, M. Charikar, and K. Li. March 2011. Efficient k-nearest neighbor graph
construction for generic similarity measures. In Proceedings of the 20th International
Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), pp. 577–586. DOI: 10.1145/1963405.1963487.
109, 133
J. J. Dongarra, J. Du Croz, S. Hammarling, and I. S. Duff. 1990. A set of level 3 basic linear
algebra subprograms. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 16(1):
1–17. DOI: 10.1145/77626.79170. 111
B. Dostal. 2007. Enhancing situational understanding through employment of unmanned
aerial vehicle. Army Transformation Taking Shape: Interim Brigade Combat Team
Newsletter. 166, 167
C. Dousson, P. Gaborit, and M. Ghallab. 1993. Situation recognition: Representation and
algorithms. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 13,
pp. 166–166. 166, 167
M. Douze, H. Jégou, H. Singh, L. Amsaleg, and C. Schmid. July 2009. Evaluation of GIST
descriptors for web-scale image search. In Proceedings of the ACM International
Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 140–147. 132
Bibliography
329
M. Douze, H. Jégou, and F. Perronnin. October 2016. PCIVRolysemous codes. In ECCV,
pp. 785–801. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46475-6_48. 109, 134
J. Downie. 2008. The music information retrieval evaluation exchange (2005–2007): A
window into music information retrieval research. Acoustical Science and Technology,
29(4): 247–255. DOI: 10.1250/ast.29.247. 37
S. Duan, J. Zhang, P. Roe, and M. Towsey. 2014. A survey of tagging techniques for music,
speech and environmental sound. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42(4): 637–661.
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-012-9362-y. 38
L. Dubbeld. 2002. Protecting personal data in camera surveillance practices. Surveillance &
Society, 2(4). 91
R. Duda and P. Hart. 1996. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis. Wiley. 167
F. Dufaux and T. Ebrahimi. 2004. Video surveillance using JPEG 2000. In International
Society for Optics and Photonics. Optical Science and Technology, pp. 268–275.
DOI: 10.1117/12.564828. 91
F. Dufaux and T. Ebrahimi. 2008. Scrambling for privacy protection in video surveillance
systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 18(8): 1168–
1174. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2008.928225. 92, 93
N. Eagle and A. Pentland. 2006. Reality mining: Sensing complex social systems. Personal
and Ubiquitous Computing, 10(4): 255–268. DOI: 10.1007/s00779-005-0046-3. 55, 187
P. Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3/4): 169–200.
DOI: 10.1080/02699939208411068. 236
A. El Ali, A. Matviienko, Y. Feld, W. Heuten, and S. Boll. 2016. VapeTracker: Tracking vapor
consumption to help e-cigarette users quit. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference
Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2049–2056. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2851581.2892318. 188
T. Elgamal. 1985. A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete
logarithms. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual International Cryptology Conference,
volume 196 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 10–18. Springer. DOI: 10.1109
/TIT.1985.1057074. 79
T. Elgamal, M. Yabandeh, A. Aboulnaga, W. Mustafa, and M. Hefeeda. 2015. sPCA: Scalable
principal component analysis for big data on distributed platforms. In Proceedings
of ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD), pp. 79–91.
DOI: 10.1145/2723372.2751520. 276, 277, 278, 279, 280
P. Elias and L. Roberts. 1963. Machine Perception of Three-Dimensional Solids. PhD thesis,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/11589. 159
B. Elizalde, G. Friedland, H. Lei, and A. Divakaran. October 2012. There is no data like
less data: percepts for video concept detection on consumer-produced media. In
Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2012 (MM’12), pp. 27–32. DOI: 10.1145/2390214
.2390223. 43
330
Bibliography
B. Elizalde, A. Kumar, R. Badlani, A. Bhatnagar, A. Shah, R. Singh, B. Raj, and I. Lane, 2016.
Never Ending Learning of Sound. http://nels.cs.cmu.edu. 48
D. P. W. Ellis. March 2007. Beat tracking by dynamic programming. J. New Music Research,
36(1): 51–60. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/pubs/Ellis07-beattrack.pdf.
DOI: 10.1080/09298210701653344. Special Issue on Tempo and Beat Extraction.
38
D. P. W. Ellis and G. Poliner. 2007. Identifying cover songs with chroma features and dynamic
programming beat tracking. In Proceedings of the ICASSP-07, pp. 1429–1432. Hawai’i.
http://www.ee.columbia.edu
/~dpwe/pubs/EllisP07-coversongs.pdf. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2007.367348. 38
D. P. W. Ellis, R. Singh, and S. Sivadas. 2001. Tandem acoustic modeling in large-vocabulary
recognition. In (ICASSP, pp. I–517–520. Salt Lake City. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/
~dpwe/pubs/icassp01-spine.pdf. 36
P. Embrechts, T. Liniger, and L. Lin. Aug. 2011. Multivariate Hawkes processes:
An application to financial data. Journal of Applied Probability, pp. 367–378.
DOI: 10.1017/S0021900200099344. 200
M. Endsley. May 1988. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In
Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, volume 3,
pp. 789–795. DOI: 10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097. 165, 167
Z. Erkin, A. Piva, S. Katzenbeisser, R. L. Lagendijk, J. Shokrollahi, G. Neven, and M. Barni,
2006. SPEED project. http://www.speedproject.eu/. 76
Z. Erkin, A. Piva, S. Katzenbeisser, R. L. Lagendijk, J. Shokrollahi, G. Neven, and M. Barni.
2007. Protection and retrieval of encrypted multimedia content: When cryptography
meets signal processing. EURASIP Journal on Information Security, 2007, article 78943.
DOI: 10.1155/2007/78943. 77, 79, 80
Z. Erkin, M. Franz, J. Guajardo, S. Katzenbeisser, I. Lagendijk, and T. Toft. 2009. Privacypreserving face recognition. In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium, Privacy
Enhancing Technologies, volume 5672 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 235–
253. Springer. DOI: 10.1155/2007/78943. 82, 94, 96
Z. Erkin, M. Beye, T. Veugeri, and R. L. Lagendijk. 2011. Efficiently computing private
recommendations. In (ICASSP), pp. 5864–5867. DOI: 10.1504/IJACT.2014.062738. 82
S. Escalera, X. Bar, J. Gonzlez, M. A. Bautista, M. Madadi, M. Reyes, V. Ponce, H. J. Escalante,
J. Shotton, and I. Guyon. 2014. ChaLearn Looking at People Challenge 2014: Dataset
and results. In ECCV Workshops, pp. 459–473. 57
N. Evans, S. Marcel, A. Ross, and A. B. J. Teoh. 2015. Biometrics security and privacy
protection [from the guest editors]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 32(5): 17–18. 83
M. Everingham, L. Van Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. 2012. The PASCAL
Visual Object Classes Challenge 2012 (VOC2012) Results. http://www.pascalnetwork
.org/challenges/VOC/voc2012/workshop/index.html. 227
Bibliography
331
M. Everingham, S. M. A. Eslami, L. Gool, C. K. I. Williams, J. Winn, and A. Zisserman. 2014.
The Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge: A retrospective. International Journal of
Computer Vision (IJCV), 111(1): 98–136. 220, 226
H. J. Eysenck. 1947. Dimensions of Personality. The International Library of Psychology.
Transaction Publishers.
R. Fagin. June 1998. Fuzzy queries in multimedia database systems. In Proceedings of the ACM
Symposium on Principles of Database Systems, pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1145/275487.275488.
105
R. Fagin, R. Kumar, and D. Sivakumar. 2003. Efficient similarity search and classification
via rank aggregation. In SIGMOD, pp. 301–312. DOI: 10.1145/872757.872795. 114
C.-I. Fan, S.-Y. Huang, and W.-C. Hsu. 2015. Encrypted data deduplication in cloud storage.
In 2015 10th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS), pp. 18–25. IEEE.
DOI: 10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2015.12. 94
Farach-Colton and P. Indyk. October 1999. Approximate nearest neighbor algorithms
for Hausdorff metrics via embeddings. In Proceedings of the Symposium on the
Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 171–179. DOI: 10.1109/SFFCS.1999.814589. 133
C. Feichtenhofer, A. Pinz, and A. Zisserman. 2016. Convolutional two-stream network fusion
for video action recognition. In CVPR, pp. 1933–1941. 11, 24
P. Flajolet and G. N. Martin. October 1985. Probabilistic counting algorithms for data
base applications. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 31(2): 182–209. DOI:
10.1016/0022-0000(85)90041-8. 120
M. Flickner, S. Harpreet, W. Niblack, J. Ashley, Q. Huang, B. Dom, M. Gorkani, J. Hafner,
D. Lee, D. Petkovic, D. Steele, and P. Yanker. September 1995. Query by image and
video content: The QBIC system. Computer, 28: 23–32. DOI: 10.1109/2.410146. 105
C. Fontaine and F. Galand. 2007. A survey of homomorphic encryption for nonspecialists.
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, EURASIP Journal on Information Security, 2007,
pp. 1–10. DOI: 10.1155/2007/13801. 77
J. Fortmann, E. Root, S. Boll, and W. Heuten. 2016. Tangible apps bracelet: Designing
modular wrist-worn digital jewellery for multiple purposes. In Proceedings of the 2016
ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS ’16, pp. 841–852. ACM, New
York. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2901790.2901838. DOI: 10.1145/2901790.2901838.
188
T. Foulsham, R. Dewhurst, M. Nyström, H. Jarodzka, R. Johansson, G. Underwood, and
K. Holmqvist. 2012. Comparing scanpaths during scene encoding and recognition:
A multi-dimensional approach. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 5(4:3): 1–14.
DOI: 10.16910/jemr.5.4.3. 229
M. Franz and S. Katzenbeisser. 2011. Processing encrypted floating point signals. In
Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Multimedia Workshop on Multimedia and Security,
pp. 103–108. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2037252.2037271. 102
332
Bibliography
M. Franz, B. Deiseroth, K. Hamacher, S. Katzenbeisser, S. Jha, and H. Schroeder. 2010.
Secure computations on real-valued signals. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop
on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pp. 25–27. DOI: 10.1109/WIFS
.2010.5711458. 102
G. Friedland and D. van Leeuwen. 2010. Speaker recognition and diarization. In Semantic
Computing, pp. 115–130. IEEE Press/Wileys. DOI: 10.1002/9780470588222.ch7. 36
J. H. Friedman, J. L. Bentley, and R. A. Finkel. 1977. An algorithm for finding best matches
in logarithmic expected time. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 3(3):
209–226. DOI: 10.1145/355744.355745. 107
J.-J. Fuchs. November 2011. Spread representations. In ASILOMAR. DOI: 10.1109/ACSSC
.2011.6190120. 126
T. Fujishima. 1999. Realtime chord recognition of musical sound: A system using Common
Lisp music. In Proceedings International Computer Music Conference, pp. 464–467.
http://www-ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/mus423h/Real_Time_Chord_Recognition_
Musical.html. 37
K. Fukushima. 1980. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism
of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36(4):
193–202. 5
T. Furon and H. Jégou. February 2013. Using extreme value theory for image detection.
Research Report RR-8244, INRIA. 106
T. Furon, H. Jégou, L. Amsaleg, and B. Mathon. November 2013. Fast and secure
similarity search in high dimensional space. In WIFS, pp. 73–78. DOI: 10.1109/WIFS
.2013.6707797. 105
GaiKai. January 2015. GaiKai web page. http://www.gaikai.com/. 287, 291
GamingAnywhere Repository. 2013. GamingAnywhere: An open source cloud gaming
project. http://gaminganywhere.org. 292, 294, 296
R. Ganti, F. Ye, and H. Lei. 2011. Mobile crowdsensing: Current state and future challenges.
IEEE Communication Magazine, 49(11): 32–39. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069707.
268
M. Gao. 2012. EventShop: A scalable framework for analysis of spatio-temporal-thematic data
streams. PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine. 183
M. Gao, V. K. Singh, and R. Jain. 2012. EventShop: From heterogeneous web streams to
personalized situation detection and control. In Proceedings of the 4th Annual ACM
Web Science Conference, pp. 105–108. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2380718.2380733. 161, 177,
185
L. P. Garcı́a-Perera, J. A. Nolazco-Flores, B. Raj, and R. M. Stern. 2012. Optimization of
the DET curve in speaker verification. In 2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology
Workshop (SLT), Miami, FL, USA, December 2–5, 2012, pp. 318–323. DOI: 10.1109/SLT
.2012.6424243. 36
Bibliography
333
L. P. Garcı́a-Perera, B. Raj, and J. A. Nolazco-Flores. 2013a. Ensemble approach in speaker
verification. In INTERSPEECH 2013, 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech
Communication Association, Lyon, France, August 25–29, 2013, pp. 2455–2459. 36
L. P. Garcı́a-Perera, B. Raj, and J. A. Nolazco-Flores. 2013b. Optimization of the DET curve
in speaker verification under noisy conditions. In IEEE International Conference on
Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2013, Vancouver, BC, Canada, May
26–31, 2013, pp. 7765–7769. 36
D. Gatica-Perez. 2009. Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: A
review. Image and Vision Computing, 27(12): 1775–1787. DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2009
.01.004. 55
T. Ge, K. He, Q. Ke, and J. Sun. June 2013. Optimized product quantization for approximate
nearest neighbor search. In CVPR, pp. 744–755. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.240. 131
I.-D. Gebru, X. Alameda-Pineda, F. Forbes, and R. Horaud. 2016. EM algorithms for weighteddata clustering with application to audio-visual scene analysis. IEEE TPAMI, 38(12):
2402–2415. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2522425. 55
H. W. Gellersen, A. Schmidt, and M. Beigl. 2002. Multi-sensor context-awareness in
mobile devices and smart artifacts. Mobile Networks and Applications, 7(5): 341–351.
DOI: 10.1023/A:1016587515822. 187
X. Geng and Y. Xia. 2014. Head pose estimation based on multivariate label distribution. In
CVPR. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.237. 57
C. Gentry. 2009. A fully homomorphic encryption scheme. PhD thesis, Stanford University. 77,
101
L. Georgiadis, M. Neely, and L. Tassiulas. 2006. Resource allocation and cross-layer control in
wireless networks. Foundations and Trends in Networking. DOI: 10.1561/1300000001.
265
I. Ghosh and V. Singh. 2016. Predicting privacy attitudes using phone metadata. In
Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural
Modeling & Prediction and Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation,
Washington DC, volume 1, pp. 51–60. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39931-7_6. 188
D. Giannoulis, E. Benetos, D. Stowell, M. Rossignol, M. Lagrange, and M. Plumbley, 2013.
IEEE AASP challenge: Detection and classification of acoustic scenes and events.
Web resource, available: http://c4dm.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/sceneseventschallenge/.
DOI: 10.1109/WASPAA.2013.6701819. 38
S. O. Gilani, R. Subramanian, Y. Yan, D. Melcher, N. Sebe, and S. Winkler. 2015. PET: An eyetracking dataset for animal-centric Pascal object classes. In International Conference
on Multimedia & Expo (ICME). DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2015.7177450. 221, 226, 230, 233,
234, 236
A. Gionis, P. Indyk, and R. Motwani. 1999. Similarity search in high dimension via hashing.
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Databases, pp. 518–529.
105, 113, 132
334
Bibliography
M. Girolami, S. Lenzi, F. Furfari, and S. Chessa. 2008. SAIL: A sensor abstraction and
integration layer for context awareness. In 2008 34th Euromicro Conference Software
Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 374–381. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/SEAA.2008
.30. 187
R. Girshick. 2015. Fast R-CNN. In ICCV, pp. 1440–1448. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169. 3, 9
R. Girshick, J. Donahue, T. Darrell, and J. Malik. 2014. Rich feature hierarchies for
accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In CVPR, pp. 580–587.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81. 9
A. Goldberg, B. Recht, J. Xu, R. Nowak, and X. Zhu. 2010. Transduction with matrix
completion: Three birds with one stone. In NIPS, pp. 757–765. 57, 60, 62, 68
D. Goldman. Apr. 2012. Google unveils ‘Project Glass’ virtual-reality glasses. In Money.
DOI: 10.1109/NWeSP.2011.6088206. 313
O. Goldreich, S. Micali, and A. Wigderson. 1987. How to play any mental game. In Proceedings
of the Nineteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 218–229. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/28395.28420. 80
S. Goldwasser and S. Micali. 1984. Probabilistic encryption. Elsevier Journal of Computer and
System Sciences, 28(2): 270–299. DOI: 10.1016/0022-0000(84)9 0070-9. 80
B. Golub and M. O. Jackson. 2010. Using selection bias to explain the observed structure
of internet diffusions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(24):
10833–10836. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1000814107. 145
Y. Gong and S. Lazebnik. June 2011. Iterative quantization: A procrustean approach to
learning binary codes. In CVPR, pp. 817–824. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995432. 122,
124
Z. Gong, X. Gu, and J. Wilkes. 2010. PRESS: Predictive elastic resource scaling for cloud
systems. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Network and Service
Management (CNSM), pp. 9–16. DOI: 10.1109/CNSM.2010.5691343. 259
M. C. Gonzalez, C. A. Hidalgo, and A.-L. Barabasi. 2008. Understanding individual human
mobility patterns. Nature, 453(7196): 779–782. DOI: 10.1038/nature06958. 187
I. J. Goodfellow, D. Warde-Farley, M. Mirza, A. C. Courville, and Y. Bengio. 2013. Maxout
networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML),
pp. 1319–1327. 6
D. Gorisse, M. Cord, and F. Precioso. February 2012. Locality-sensitive hashing for CHI2
distance. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 34(2): 402–409. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.193. 133
G. J. Gorn. 1982. The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical
conditioning approach. The Journal of Marketing, pp. 94–101. DOI: 10.2307/1251163.
187
M. Goto. 2001. A predominant-F0 estimation method for CD recordings: Map estimation
using EM algorithm for adaptive tone models. In Proceedings ICASSP-2001, pp. 3365–
3368. 37
Bibliography
335
V. K. Goyal, M. Vetterli, and N. T. Thao. January 1998. Quantized overcomplete expansions
in RN : Analysis, synthesis, and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 44(1): 16–31.
DOI: 10.1109/18.650985. 121, 124
K. Graffi, D. Stingl, C. Gross, H. Nguyen, A. Kovacevic, and R. Steinmetz. 2010. Towards a
P2P cloud: Reliable resource reservations in unreliable P2P systems. In Proceedings of
IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 27–34.
DOI: 10.1109/ICPADS.2010.34. 259
A. Graves. 2012. Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks. Springer. 6
A. Graves, A. Mohamed, and G. E. Hinton. 2013. Speech recognition with deep recurrent
neural networks. In ICASSP, pp. 6645–6649. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947. 3,
12
R. M. Gray and D. L. Neuhoff. October 1998. Quantization. IEEE Transactions on Information
Theory, 44: 2325–2384. DOI: 10.1109/18.720541. 117, 127, 128
J. Gu, Z. Wang, J. Kuen, L. Ma, A. Shahroudy, B. Shuai, T. Liu, X. Wang, and G. Wang. 2016.
Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. In arXiv:1512.07108. 6
S. Guadarrama, N. Krishnamoorthy, G. Malkarnenkar, S. Venugopalan, R. Mooney, T. Darrell,
and K. Saenko. 2013. YouTube2Text: Recognizing and describing arbitrary activities
using semantic hierarchies and zero-shot recognition. In ICCV, pp. 2712–2719.
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.337. 16, 26
J. Guo, C. Gurrin, and S. Lao. 2013. Who produced this video, amateur or professional?
In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval,
pp. 271–278. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2461466.2461509. 147
S. Gupta and J. Nicholson. 1985. Simple visual reaction time, personality strength of
the nervous system: Theory approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(4):
461–469. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(85)90139-4. 244
A. Guttman. 1984. R-trees: A dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In SIGMOD,
pp. 47–57. DOI: 10.1145/602259.602266. 107
H. Haddadi, H. Howard, A. Chaudhry, J. Crowcroft, A. Madhavapeddy, and R. Mortier. 2015.
Personal data: Thinking inside the box. In arXiv:1501.04737. 188
A. Hanjalic. 2013. Multimedia retrieval that matters. ACM Transactions on Multimedia
Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), 9(1s): 44. DOI: 10.1145
/2490827. 155
A. Hanjalic and L.-Q. Xu. 2005. Affective video content representation and modeling. IEEE
Transcations on Multimedia, 7(1): 143–154. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2004.840618. 221
A. Hanjalic, C. Kofler, and M. Larson. 2012. Intent and its discontents: The user at the
wheel of the online video search engine. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM International
Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1239–1248. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2393347.2396424. 140
D. A. Harville. 1998. Matrix Algebra from a Statistician’s Perspective. Springer-verlag. 185
A. G. Hawkes. 1971. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes.
Biometrika, pp. 83–90. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/58.1.83. 193, 197, 198, 200
336
Bibliography
A. G. Hawkes and D. Oakes. 1974. A cluster process representation of a self-exciting process.
Journal of Applied Probability, 11: 493–503. DOI: 10.2307/3212693. 200
S. Haynes and R. Jain. 1986. Event detection and correspondence. Optical Engineering, 25:
387–393. DOI: 10.1117/12.7973835. 159
K. He, F. Wen, and J. Sun. June 2013. K-means hashing: An affinity-preserving quantization
method for learning binary compact codes. In CVPR, pp. 2938–2945. DOI: 10.1109
/CVPR.2013.378. 121
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. 2016a. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In
ECCV, pp. 630–645. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38. 6
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun. 2016b. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In
CVPR, pp. 770–778. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2016.90. 5, 6, 9
L. He, G. Liu, and C. Yuchen. Jul. 2014. Buffer status and content aware scheduling scheme
for cloud gaming based on video streaming. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on
Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICME), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICMEW.2014.6890629.
309
F. C. Heilbron, V. Escorcia, B. Ghanem, and J. C. Niebles. 2015. ActivityNet: A large-scale
video benchmark for human activity understanding. In CVPR, pp. 1914–1923. 19, 22,
23
M. Hemmati, A. Javadtalab, A. A. Nazari Shirehjini, S. Shirmohammadi, and T. Arici. 2013.
Game as video: Bit rate reduction through adaptive object encoding. In Proceedings
of the 23rd ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio
and Video, NOSSDAV ’13, pp. 7–12. ACM, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2460782.2460784.
310
J. Hershey, S. Rennie, P. Olsen, and T. Kristjansson. 2010. Super-human multi-talker speech
recognition: A graphical modeling approach. Computer Speech & Language, 24(1):
45–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2008.11.001. 37
G. Higgins. December 14, 1993. System for distributing, processing and displaying financial
information. US Patent 5,270,922. 165
G. Hinton, L. Deng, D. Yu, G. E. Dahl, A.-R. Mohamed, N. Jaitly, A. Senior, V. Vanhoucke,
P. Nguyen, T. N. Sainath, et al. 2012. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in
speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, pp. 82–97. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597. 3
G. E. Hinton, S. Osindero, and Y.-W. Teh. 2006. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief
nets. Neural Computation, 18(7): 1527–1554. DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527.
M. Hirt and K. Sako. 2000. Efficient receipt-free voting based on homomorphic encryption.
In Advances in Cryptology, volume 1807 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pp. 539–556. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45539-6_38. 81
G. Hjaltason and H. Samet. 1998. Incremental distance join algorithms for spatial databases.
In ACM SIGMOD Record, volume 27, pp. 237–248. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/276305.276326.
173
Bibliography
337
S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation,
9(8): 1735–1780. DOI: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. 16
S. C. Hoi, W. Liu, and S.-F. Chang. 2008. Semi-supervised distance metric learning for
collaborative image retrieval. In CVPR, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1145/1823746.1823752. 149
H. Hong, D. Chen, C. Huang, K. Chen, and C. Hsu. 2015. Placing virtual machine to optimize
cloud gaming experience. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 3(1): 42–53.
DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2014.2338295. 259
H. Hong, J. Chuang, and C. Hsu. 2016a. Animation rendering on multimedia fog computing
platforms. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing
Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp. 336–343. DOI: 10.1109/CloudCom.2016.0060.
274, 275
H. Hong, P. Tsai, and C. Hsu. 2016b. Dynamic module deployment in a fog computing
platform. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management
Symposium (APNOMS), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/APNOMS.2016.7737202. 282, 283, 284
H.-J. Hong, D.-Y. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, K.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Hsu. 2014a. Placing virtual machines to optimize cloud gaming experience. IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing,
pp. 1–2. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6853364.
DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2014.2338295. 296
H.-J. Hong, T.-Y. Fan-Chiang, C.-R. Lee, K.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Huang, and C.-H. Hsu. 2014b.
GPU consolidation for cloud games: Are we there yet? 2014 13th Annual Workshop on
Network and Systems Support for Games (NetGames), article 3. DOI: 10.1109/NetGames
.2014.7008969. 297, 302
C.-F. Hsu, T.-H. Tsai, C.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Hsu, and K.-T. Chen. Mar 2015. Screencast dissected:
Performance measurements and design considerations. In Proceedings of ACM
Multimedia Systems 2015, pp. 177–188. DOI: 10.1145/2713168.2713176. 297
C. Y. Hsu, C. S. Lu, and S. C. Pei. 2009. Secure and robust SIFT. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 637–640. DOI: 10.1145/1631272.1631376.
86, 87
C. Y. Hsu, C. S. Lu, and S. C. Pei. 2011. Homomorphic encryption-based secure SIFT for
privacy-preserving feature extraction. Proceedings of the International Society for Optics
and Photonics, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging, 7880(788005). DOI: 10.1117/12.873325.
86, 87, 90
G. Hu and D. L. Wang. 2003. Monaural speech separation. In NIPS, volume 13. MIT Press,
Cambridge MA. 37
X.-S. Hua, L. Yang, J. Wang, J. Wang, M. Ye, K. Wang, Y. Rui, and J. Li. 2013. Clickage:
Towards bridging semantic and intent gaps via mining click logs of search engines.
In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 243–
252. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502283. 148
C.-Y. Huang, D.-Y. Chen, C.-H. Hsu, and K.-T. Chen. Oct. 2013a. GamingAnywhere: An opensource cloud gaming testbed. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia 2013 (Open Source
Software Competition Track), pp. 36–47. DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502222. 297
338
Bibliography
C.-Y. Huang, C.-H. Hsu, D.-Y. Chen, and K.-T. Chen. 2013b. Quantifying user satisfaction in
mobile cloud games. In Proceedings of Workshop on Mobile Video Delivery, MoViD’14,
pp. 4:1–6. ACM, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2579465.2579468. 297
C.-Y. Huang, K.-T. Chen, D.-Y. Chen, H.-J. Hsu, and C.-H. Hsu. Jan. 2014a. GamingAnywhere:
The first open source cloud gaming system. ACM Transactions on Multimedia
Computer Communication Applications, 10(1s): 10:1–25. DOI: 10.1145/2537855. 292,
293
C.-Y. Huang, P.-H. Chen, Y.-L. Huang, K.-T. Chen, and C.-H. Hsu. 2014b. Measuring the
client performance and energy consumption in mobile cloud gaming. 2014 13th
Annual Workshop on Network and Systems Support for Games (NetGames), pp. 4–6. 297
R. W. Hubbard, S. Magotiaux, and M. Sullivan. 2004. The state use of closed circuit TV: Is
there a reasonable expectation of privacy in public? Crim. LQ, 49: 222. 91
D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel. 1968. Receptive fields and functional architecture of
monkey striate cortex. The Journal of Physiology, pp. 215–243. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol
.1968.sp008455. 5
H. Hung and B. Kröse. 2011. Detecting F-formations as dominant sets. In Proceedings
of the 13th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI), pp. 231–238.
DOI: 10.1145/2070481.2070525. 70
ICSI, U. Berkeley, Yahoo, and LLNL. 2015. The Multimedia Commons Project.
http://mmcommons.org. 39
H. Idrees, A. R. Zamir, Y.-G. Jiang, A. Gorban, I. Laptev, R. Sukthankar, and M. Shah.
2016. The THUMOS challenge on action recognition for videos “in the wild.” In
arXiv:1604.06182. DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2016.10.018. 23
D. Imseng and G. Friedland. 2010. Tuning-robust initialization methods for speaker
diarization. Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 18(8): 2028–2037.
DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2010.2040796. 36
P. Indyk. 2002. Approximate nearest neighbor algorithms for Frechet distance via product
metrics. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computational
Geometry, pp. 102–106. DOI: 10.1145/513400.513414. 133
P. Indyk and R. Motwani. 1998. Approximate nearest neighbors: Towards removing the
curse of dimensionality. In STOC, pp. 604–613. DOI: 10.1145/276698.276876. 105,
107, 108, 114
P. Indyk and A. Naor. Aug. 2007. Nearest-neighbor-preserving embeddings. ACM Transactions
on Algorithms (TALG), 3: article 31. DOI: 10.1145/1273340.1273347. 133
P. Indyk and N. Thaper. Oct. 2003. Fast image retrieval via embeddings. In International
Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision, ICCV Workshop. 120
Infinity Research. Dec. 2016. Global Cloud Gaming Market 2017–2021. http://www
.technavio.com/report/global-gaming-global-cloud-gaming-market-2017-2021. 287
S. Ioffe and C. Szegedy. 2015. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by
reducing internal covariate shift. In ICML, pp. 448–456. 6
Bibliography
339
R. Iqbal, S. Shirmohammadi, and A. E. Saddik. 2006. Compressed-domain encryption of
adapted H.264 video. Proceedings of IEEE 8th International Symposium on Multimedia,
pp. 979–984. DOI: 10.1109/ISM.2006.50. 92, 93
N. Islam, W. Puech, and R. Brouzet. 2009. A homomorphic method for sharing secret
images. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Digital Watermarking, volume 5703 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 121–135. Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03688-0_13. 88
Y. Isoda, S. Kurakake, and H. Nakano. 2004. Ubiquitous sensors based human behavior
modeling and recognition using a spatio-temporal representation of user states. In
18th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications,
volume 1, pp. 512–517. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/AINA.2004.1283961. 187
L. Itti and C. Koch. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert
shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10): 1489–1506. DOI: 10.1016/S00426989(99)00163-7. 222
L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid
scene analysis. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 20(11): 1254–1259. DOI: 10.1109/34.730558. 231
H. Jain, P. Pérez, R. Gribonval, J. Zepeda, and H. Jégou. October 2016. Approximate search
with quantized sparse representations. In ECCV, pp. 681–696. DOI: 10.1007/978-3319-46478-7_42. 131
R. Jain and D. Sonnen. 2011. Social life networks. IT Professional, 13(5): 8–11. DOI: 10.1109
/MITP.2011.86. 137
G. Jakobson, J. Buford, and L. Lewis. Oct. 2006. A framework of cognitive situation modeling
and recognition. In Military Communications Conference, 2006. IEEE, pp. 1–7.
DOI: 10.1109/MILCOM.2006.302076. 166
M. Jamali and M. Ester. 2009. TrustWalker: A random walk model for combining trustbased and item-based recommendation. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD
International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 397–406. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1557019.1557067. 152
B. J. Jansen. 2006. Search log analysis: What it is, what’s been done, how to do it. Library &
Information Science Research, 28(3): 407–432. DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2006.06.005. 148
S. Jarvinen, J.-P. Laulajainen, T. Sutinen, and S. Sallinen. 2006. QoS-aware real-time video
encoding how to improve the user experience of a gaming-on-demand service.
2006 3rd IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, 2: 994–
997. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=1593187.
DOI 10.1109/CCNC.2006.1593187. 308
E. Jeannot, C. Kelly, and D. Thompson. 2003. The development of situation awareness
measures in ATM systems. EATMP Report HRS/HSP-005-REP-01. 165, 167
H. Jégou, H. Harzallah, and C. Schmid. June 2007. A contextual dissimilarity measure for
accurate and efficient image search. In CVPR, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2007
.382970. 119
340
Bibliography
H. Jégou, L. Amsaleg, C. Schmid, and P. Gros. April 2008a. Query-adaptive locality sensitive
hashing. In ICASSP, pp. 825–828. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4517737. 115, 117, 119
H. Jégou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. October 2008b. Hamming embedding and weak
geometric consistency for large scale image search. In ECCV, pp. 304–317.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_24. 120, 123, 132
H. Jégou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. February 2010a. Improving bag-of-features for large
scale image search. IJCV, 87(3): 316–336. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-009-0285-2. 116, 119
H. Jégou, M. Douze, C. Schmid, and P. Pérez. June 2010b. Aggregating local descriptors into
a compact image representation. In CVPR, pp. 3304–3311. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010
.5540039. 9, 124, 131, 132
H. Jégou, C. Schmid, H. Harzallah, and J. Verbeek. January 2010. Accurate image
search using the contextual dissimilarity measure. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 32(1): 2–11.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.285. 106
H. Jégou, M. Douze, and C. Schmid. January 2011. Product quantization for nearest neighbor
search. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 33(1): 117–128. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.57. 106, 110, 112,
123, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131
H. Jégou, R. Tavenard, M. Douze, and L. Amsaleg. May 2011. Searching in one billion
vectors: Re-rank with source coding. In ICASSP, pp. 861–864. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP
.2011.5946540. 131
H. Jégou, T. Furon, and J.-J. Fuchs. January 2012. Anti-sparse coding for approximate nearest
neighbor search. In ICASSP, pp. 2029–2032. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2012.6288307. 123,
124, 127
J. H. Jensen, M. G. Christensen, D. P. W. Ellis, and S. H. Jensen. May 2009. Quantitative
analysis of a common audio similarity measure. IEEE Transactions on Audio,
Speech, and Language Processing, 17(4): 693–703. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp
/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4804953&isnumber=4787206. DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2008
.2012314. 38
J. Ji, J. Li, S. Yan, B. Zhang, and Q. Tian. Dec. 2012. Super-bit locality-sensitive hashing. In
NIPS, pp. 108–116. 124
S. Ji, W. Xu, M. Yang, and K. Yu. 2010. 3D convolutional neural networks for human action
recognition. In ICML, pp. 221–231. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.59. 9, 10
M. Jiang, P. Cui, R. Liu, Q. Yang, F. Wang, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. 2012a. Social contextual
recommendation. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on
Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 45–54. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2396761
.2396771. 147, 152
M. Jiang, P. Cui, F. Wang, Q. Yang, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. 2012b. Social recommendation
across multiple relational domains. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1422–1431. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2396761.2398448. 152
Bibliography
341
M. Jiang, P. Cui, F. Wang, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. 2014a. Scalable recommendation with
social contextual information. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,
26(11): 2789–2802. DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2014.2300487. 152
Y.-G. Jiang, G. Ye, S.-F. Chang, D. Ellis, and A. C. Loui. 2011. Consumer video understanding:
A benchmark database and an evaluation of human and machine performance. In
ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR), p. 29. DOI: 10.1145
/1991996.1992025. 21
Y.-G. Jiang, S. Bhattacharya, S.-F. Chang, and M. Shah. 2013. High-level event recognition
in unconstrained videos. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval
(IJMIR), pp. 73–101. DOI: 10.1007/s13735-012-0024-2. 4
Y.-G. Jiang, J. Liu, A. Roshan Zamir, G. Toderici, I. Laptev, M. Shah, and R. Sukthankar.
2014b. THUMOS challenge: Action recognition with a large number of classes.
http://crcv.ucf.edu/THUMOS14/. 19, 21
Y.-G. Jiang, Z. Wu, J. Wang, X. Xue, and S.-F. Chang. 2015. Exploiting feature and class
relationships in video categorization with regularized deep neural networks.
arXiv:1502.07209. 19, 22
X. Jin, A. Gallagher, L. Cao, J. Luo, and J. Han. 2010. The wisdom of social multimedia: Using
Flickr for prediction and forecast. In Proceedings of the International Conference on
Multimedia, pp. 1235–1244. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1873951.1874196. 156
Z. Jin, Y. Hu, Y. Lin, D. Zhang, S. Lin, D. Cai, and X. Li. Dec. 2013. Complementary projection
hashing. In ICCV, pp. 257–264. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.39. 118
T. Joachims. 1999. Transductive inference for text classification using SVM. In ICML,
pp. 200–209. 68, 70, 71
J. Johnson, M. Douze, and H. Jégou. Feb. 2017. Billion-scale similarity search with GPU.
arXiv:1702.08734. 132
W. B. Johnson and J. Lindenstrauss. 1984. Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert
space. Contemp. Math., (26): 189–206. DOI: 10.1090/conm/026/737400. 107
H. Joho, J. Staiano, N. Sebe, and J. M. Jose. 2011. Looking at the viewer: Analysing facial
activity to detect personal highlights of multimedia contents. Multimedia Tools and
Applications, 51(2): 505–523. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-010-0632-x. 221, 242, 243
A. Joly and O. Buisson. 2008. A posteriori multi-probe locality sensitive hashing. In ACM
Multimedia, pp. 209–218. DOI: 10.1145/1459359.1459388. 118
A. Joly and O. Buisson. Oct. 2009. Logo retrieval with a contrario visual query expansion. In
ACM Multimedia, pp. 581–584. DOI: 10.1145/1631272.1631361. 106
A. Joly and O. Buisson. 2011. Random maximum margin hashing. In CVPR, pp. 873–880.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995709. 133
D. Joshi, R. Datta, E. Fedorovskaya, Q.-T. Luong, J. Z. Wang, J. Li, and J. Luo. 2011.
Aesthetics and emotions in images. Signal Processing Magazine, IEEE, 28(5): 94–115.
DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2011.941851. 150, 156
342
Bibliography
T. Judd, K. Ehinger, F. Durand, and A. Torralba. 2009. Learning to predict where humans
look. In ICCV, pp. 2106–2113. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459462. 222, 227
T. Kalker. 2007. A cryptographic method for secure watermark detection. In Information
Hiding, volume 4437 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 26–41. Springer.
DOI: 10.1155/2007/78943. 81
O. Kallenberg. 2006. Foundations of Modern Probability. Springer Science & Business Media.
DOI: 10.1007/b98838. 185
V. Kalofolias, X. Bresson, M. Bronstein, and P. Vandergheynst. 2014. Matrix completion on
graphs. arXiv:1408.1717. 58, 63, 64
Y. Kamarianakis and P. Prastacos. 2003. Forecasting traffic flow conditions in an urban
network: Comparison of multivariate and univariate approaches. Transportation
Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1857): 74–84.
DOI: 10.3141/1857-09. 186
M. Kantarcioglu, W. Jiang, Y. Liu, and B. Malin. 2008. A cryptographic approach to securely
share and query genomic sequences. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in
Biomedicine, 12(5): 606–617. DOI: 10.1109/TITB.2007.908465. 83
A. Kapoor, P. Shenoy, and D. Tan. 2008. Combining brain computer interfaces with vision
for object categorization. In CVPR, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587618. 220
A. Karpathy, G. Toderici, S. Shetty, T. Leung, R. Sukthankar, and L. Fei-Fei. 2014. Large-scale
video classification with convolutional neural networks. In CVPR, pp. 1725–1732.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2014.223. 10, 22
Y. Ke, R. Sukthankar, and L. Huston. 2004. Efficient near-duplicate detection and sub-image
retrieval. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 869–876. DOI: 10.1145/1027527.1027729. 105
E. G. Kehoe, J. M. Toomey, J. H. Balsters, and A. L. W. Bokde. 2012. Personality modulates
the effects of emotional arousal and valence on brain activation. Social Cognitive &
Affective Neuroscience, 7: 858–870. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsr059. 244
A. Kendon. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters, volume 7.
Cambridge University Press Archive, Cambridge. 51
A. D. Keromytis. 2009. A survey of voice over IP security research. In Information Systems
Security, volume 5905 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 1–17. Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10772-6_1. 98
L. A. Khan, M. S. Baig, and A. M. Youssef. 2010. Speaker recognition from encrypted VoIP
communications. Elsevier Digital Investigation, 7(1): 65–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2009
.10.001. 98, 99, 100
H. Kim, J. Wen, and J. D. Villasenor. 2007. Secure arithmetic coding. IEEE Transactions on
Signal Processing, 55(5): 2263–2272. DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2007.892710. 86
J. Kim and E. Andre. 2008. Emotion recognition based on physiological changes in music
listening. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(12): 2067–2083.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.26. 242, 243
Bibliography
343
S.-S. Kim, K.-I. Kim, and J. Won. 2011. Multi-view rendering approach for cloud-based
gaming services. In AFIN 2011, The Third International Conference on Advances in
Future Internet, pp. 102–107. ISBN 9781612081489. 300
S. Kingsbury. 1987. Wisdom for the masses. American Speech, pp. 358–360. DOI: 10.2307
/455412. 162
H. Kiya and M. Fujiyoshi. 2012. Signal and image processing in the encrypted domain. ECIT
Transactions on Computer and Information Technology, 6(1): 11–18. 87, 88, 90
A. Klapuri. 2003. Multiple fundamental frequency estimation by harmonicity and spectral
smoothness. IEEE Trans. Speech and Audio Processing, 11(6): 804–816. http://www.cs
.tut.fi/sgn/arg/klap/multiplef0.pdf. DOI: 10.1109/TSA.2003.815516. 37
S. Koelstra and I. Patras. 2013. Fusion of facial expressions and EEG for implicit affective
tagging. Image and Vision Computing, 31(2): 164–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2012.10
.002. 247
S. Koelstra, C. Mühl, M. Soleymani, J.-S. Lee, A. Yazdan, T. Ebrahimi, T. Pun, A. Nijholt, and
I. Patras. 2012. DEAP: A database for emotion analysis using physiological signals.
IEEE Trans. Affective Computing, 3(1): 18–31. DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.15. 221, 240,
242, 247, 249
C. Kofler, M. Larson, and A. Hanjalic. 2014. Intent-aware video search result optimization.
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16(5): 1421–1433. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2014
.2315777. 140
A. Kojima, T. Tamura, and K. Fukunaga. 2002. Natural language description of human
activities from video images based on concept hierarchy of actions. IJCV, pp. 171–
184. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020346032608. 16
D. Kounades-Bastian, L. Girin, X. Alameda-Pineda, S. Gannot, and R. Horaud. 2016. A
variational EM algorithm for the separation of time-varying convolutive audio
mixtures. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 24(8):
1408–1423. DOI: 10.1109/TASLP.2016.2554286. 53
D. Kounades-Bastian, L. Girin, X. Alameda-Pineda, S. Gannot, and R. Horaud. 2017. An EM
algorithm for joint source separation and diarisation of multichannel convolutive
mixtures. In IEEE International Conference on Audio, Speech and Signal Processing.
New Orleans, USA. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2017.7951789. 53
N. Krahnstoever, M.-C. Chang, and W. Ge. 2011. Gaze and body pose estimation from a
distance. In AVSS, pp. 11–16. DOI: 10.1109/AVSS.2011.6027285. 57
G. Krieger, I. Rentschler, G. Hauske, K. Schill, and C. Zetzsche. 2000. Object and scene
analysis by saccadic eye-movements: An investigation with higher-order statistics.
Spatial Vision, 13(2–3): 201–214. DOI: 10.1163/156856800741216. 230
A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep
convolutional neural networks. In NIPS, pp. 1097–1105. DOI: 10.1145/3065386. 3, 5,
9, 220
344
Bibliography
H. Kuehne, H. Jhuang, E. Garrote, T. Poggio, and T. Serre. 2011. HMDB: A large video
database for human motion recognition. In ICCV, pp. 2556–2563. DOI: 10.1109
/ICCV.2011.6126543. 19, 21
G. Kuhn, B. Tatler, and G. Cole. 2009. You look where I look! Effect of gaze cues on
overt and covert attention in misdirection. Visual Cognition, 17(6–7): 925–944.
DOI: 10.1080/13506280902826775. 223
B. Kulis and T. Darrell. December 2009. Learning to hash with binary reconstructive
embeddings. In NIPS, pp. 1042–1050. 124
B. Kulis and K. Grauman. October 2009. Kernelized locality-sensitive hashing for scalable
image search. In ICCV, pp. 2130–2137. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.219. 133
A. Kumar, P. Dighe, S. Chaudhuri, R. Singh, and B. Raj. 2012. Audio event detection from
acoustic unit occurrence patterns. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on
Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 489–492. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP
.2012.6287923. 39
A. Kumar, R. Singh, and B. Raj. 2014. Detecting sound objects in audio recordings. In 22nd
European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO 2014, Lisbon, Portugal, September
1–5, 2014, pp. 905–909. 47
H. Kwak, C. Lee, H. Park, and S. Moon. 2010. What is Twitter, a social network or a news
media? In WWW ’10, pp. 591–600. DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772751. 213
R. L. Lagendijk, Z. Erkin, and M. Barni. 2013. Encrypted signal processing for privacy
protection: Conveying the utility of homomorphic encryption and multiparty
computation. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(1): 82–105. DOI: 10.1109/MSP
.2012.2219653. 77, 104
O. Lanz. 2006. Approximate Bayesian multibody tracking. IEEE TPAMI, 28: 1436–1449.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.177. 59, 71
B. M. Lapham. 2014. Hawkes processes and some financial applications. Thesis, University
of Cape Town. 208
I. Laptev, M. Marszalek, C. Schmid, and B. Rozenfeld. 2008. Learning realistic human
actions from movies. In CVPR, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587756. 21
A. Lathey and P. K. Atrey. 2015. Image enhancement in encrypted domain over cloud. ACM
Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 11(3): 38.
DOI: 10.1145/2656205. 89, 90
A. Lathey, P. Atrey, and N. Joshi. 2013. Homomorphic low pass filtering over cloud. In
IEEE International Conference on International Conference on Semantic Computing,
pp. 310–313. DOI: 10.1109/ICSC.2013.60. 89, 90
P. J. Laub, T. Taimre, and P. K. Pollett. 2015. Hawkes processes. arXiv:1507.02822. 206
J.-P. Laulajainen, T. Sutinen, S. Järvinen, and S. Jarvinen. Apr. 2006. Experiments with
QoS-aware gaming-on-demand service. In 20th International Conference on Advanced
Information Networking and Applications, volume 1, pp. 805–810. DOI: 10.1109/AINA
.2006.175. 308
Bibliography
345
R. Lazzeretti, J. Guajardo, and M. Barni. 2012. Privacy preserving ECG quality evaluation. In
Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Multimedia and Security, pp. 165–174. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2361407.2361435. 83
Q. V. Le, W. Y. Zou, S. Y. Yeung, and A. Y. Ng. 2011. Learning hierarchical invariant spatiotemporal features for action recognition with independent subspace analysis. In
CVPR, pp. 3361–3368. DOI: 10.1145/2361407.2361435. 14
B. B. LeCun, J. S. Denker, D. Henderson, R. E. Howard, W. Hubbard, and L. D. Jackel. 1990.
Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In NIPS, vol. 2. 5
Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. 2001. Gradient-based learning applied to
document recognition. In Intelligent Signal Processing, pp. 306–351. DOI: 10.1109/5
.726791. 5
C. M. Lee and S. S. Narayanan. 2005. Toward detecting emotions in spoken dialogs. Speech
and Audio Processing, 13(2): 293–303. DOI: 10.1109/TSA.2004.838534. 221
H. Lei, J. Choi, A. Janin, and G. Friedland. May 2011. Persona linking: Matching uploaders
of videos across accounts. In Proceedings of ICASSP, pp. 2404–2407. 39
H. Lei, J. Choi, and G. Friedland. 2012. Multimodal city-verification on Flickr videos using
acoustic and textual features. In Proceedings of ICASSP, pp. 2273–2276. DOI: 10.1109
/ICASSP.2012.6288367. 39
H. Lejsek, F. H. Asmundsson, B. P. Jónsson, and L. Amsaleg. May 2009. NV-tree: An efficient
disk-based index for approximate search in very large high-dimensional collections.
IEEE Trans. PAMI, 31(5): 869–883. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.130. 112, 114
B. Lepri, R. Subramanian, K. Kalimeri, J. Staiano, F. Pianesi, and N. Sebe. 2012. Connecting
meeting behavior with Extraversion—A systematic study. IEEE Trans. Affective
Computing, 3(4): 443–455. DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.17. 238, 240
J. Leskovec, A. Singh, and J. Kleinberg. 2006. Patterns of influence in a recommendation
network. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
pp. 380–389. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/11731139_44. 152
H. J. Levesque, R. Reiter, Y. Lespérance, F. Lin, and R. B. Scherl. 1997. GOLOG: A logic
programming language for dynamic domains. Journal of Logic Programming, P1(1–3):
59–83. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-1066(96)00121-5. 165
M. S. Lew, N. Sebe, C. Djeraba, and R. Jain. 2006. Content-based multimedia information
retrieval: State of the art and challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing,
Communications, and Applications, 2(1): 1–19. DOI: 10.1145/1126004.1126005. 85
J. Li, Q. Wang, C. Wang, N. Cao, K. Ren, and W. Lou. 2010. Fuzzy keyword search over
encrypted data in cloud computing. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 441–445.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-38562-9_74. 260
P. Li, X. Yu, Y. Liu, and T. Zhang. 2014. Crowdsourcing fraud detection algorithm based on
Ebbinghaus forgetting curve. International Journal of Security and Its Applications,
8(1): 283–290. DOI: 10.14257/ijsia.2014.8.1.26. 262
346
Bibliography
Q. Li, Z. Qiu, T. Yao, T. Mei, Y. Rui, and J. Luo. 2016a. Action recognition by learning
deep multi-granular spatio-temporal video representation. In ICMR, 159–166.
DOI: 10.1145/2911996.2912001. 12
W. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. Sun, W. Wang, W. Zhang, and X. Lin. 2016b. Approximate nearest neighbor
search on high dimensional data—Experiments, analyses, and improvement (v1.0).
arXiv:1610.02455. 134
X. Li, C. G. Snoek, and M. Worring. 2009. Learning social tag relevance by neighbor
voting. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 11(7): 1310–1322. DOI: 10.1109/TMM
.2009.2030598. 148
Z. Li, E. Gavves, M. Jain, and C. G. Snoek. 2016c. VideoLSTM convolves, attends and flows
for action recognition. arXiv:1607.01794. 13
C. Liao, T. Hou, T. Lin, Y. Cheng, C. H. A. Erbad, and N. Venkatasubramania. 2014. SAIS:
Smartphone augmented infrastructure sensing for public safety and sustainability
in smart cities. In Proceedings of ACM International Workshop on Emerging Multimedia
Applications and Services for Smart Cities (EMASC), pp. 3–8. DOI: 10.1145/2661704
.2661706. 268, 269, 270, 271, 272
L. Lin, X. Liao, G. Tan, H. Jin, X. Yang, W. Zhang, and B. Li. 2014. LiveRender: A Cloud
Gaming System Based on Compressed Graphics Streaming. In Proceedings of the
ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM ’14, pp. 347–356. ACM, New York.
DOI: 10.1145/2647868.2654943. 307
T. Lin, T. Lin, C. Hsu, and C. King. 2013. Context-aware decision engine for mobile cloud
offloading. In Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference
Workshops (WCNCW), pp. 111–116. DOI: 10.1109/WCNCW.2013.6533324. 258
F. Lingenfelser, J. Wagner, E. André, G. McKeown, and W. Curran. 2014. An event driven
fusion approach for enjoyment recognition in real-time. In ACMMM, pp. 377–386.
DOI: 10.1145/2647868.2654924. 52
M. Lipczak, M. Trevisiol, and A. Jaimes. 2013. Analyzing favorite behavior in Flickr.
In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, pp. 535–545. Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35725-1_49. 148
S. Liu, P. Cui, H. Luan, W. Zhu, S. Yang, and Q. Tian. 2013a. Social visual image ranking for
web image search. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling, pp. 239–249.
Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35725-1_22. 149
S. Liu, P. Cui, W. Zhu, S. Yang, and Q. Tian. 2014. Social embedding image distance
learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia,
pp. 617–626. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2647868.2654905. 148, 149
S. Liu, P. Cui, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. 2015. Learning socially embedded visual representation
from scratch. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International conference on Multimedia,
pp. 109–118. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806247. 149
X. Liu, J. He, and B. Lang. July 2013b. Reciprocal hash tables for nearest neighbor search. In
Proceedings of the 27th Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)
Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 626–632. 118
Bibliography
347
Y. Liu and Z. Shi. 2016. Boosting video description generation by explicitly translating
from frame-level captions. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 631–634. DOI: 10.1145/2964284
.2967298. 17, 28
Y. Liu, Y. Guo, and C. Liang. 2008. A survey on peer-to-peer video streaming systems. Peerto-peer Networking and Applications, 1(1): 18–29. DOI: 10.1007/s12083-007-0006-y.
259
B. Logan et al. 2000. Mel frequency cepstral coefficients for music modeling. In International
Symposium on Music Information Retrieval, volume 28, p. 5. 37
LogMeIn. July 2012. LogMeIn web page. http://secure.logmein.com/. 291
J. Long, E. Shelhamer, and T. Darrell. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic
segmentation. In CVPR, p. 3431–3440. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683. 3, 9
A. Loui, J. Luo, S.-F. Chang, D. Ellis, W. Jiang, L. Kennedy, K. Lee, and A. Yanagawa. 2007.
Kodak’s consumer video benchmark data set: Concept definition and annotation.
In ACM Multimedia Information Retrieval (MIR) Workshop, pp. 245–254. DOI: 10.1145
/1290082.1290117. 20
D. Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International
Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2): 91–110. 106, 107, 275
W. Lu, A. Swaminathan, A. L. Varna, and M. Wu. 2009a. Enabling search over encrypted
multimedia databases. Proceedings of International Society for Optics and Photonics,
SPIE, Media Forensics and Security, pp. 7254–7318. DOI: 10.1117/12.806980. 82, 85,
86, 90
W. Lu, A. L. Varna, A. Swaminathan, and M. Wu. 2009b. Secure image retrieval through
feature protection. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal
Processing, pp. 1533–1536. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2009.4959888. 85, 86, 90
W. Lu, A. L. Varna, and M. Wu. 2010. Security analysis for privacy preserving search of
multimedia. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2093–2096.
DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2010.5653399. 86
W. Lu, A. Varna, and M. Wu. 2011. Secure video processing: Problems and challenges. In
Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing,
pp. 5856–5859. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947693. 77
P. Lucey, J. F. Cohn, T. Kanade, J. Saragih, Z. Ambadar, and I. Matthews. 2010. The
extended Cohn-Kanade dataset (CK+): A complete dataset for action unit and
emotion-specified expression. In CVPR Workshops, pp. 94–101. DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW
.2010.5543262. 221
Y. Luo, S. Ye, and S. Cheung. 2010. Anonymous subject identification in privacy-aware video
surveillance. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo,
pp. 83–88. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2010.5583561. 92
Q. Lv, M. Charikar, and K. Li. Nov. 2004. Image similarity search with compact data
structures. In CIKM, pp. 208–217. DOI: 10.1145/1031171.1031213. 120
348
Bibliography
Q. Lv, W. Josephson, Z. Wang, M. Charikar, and K. Li. 2007. Multi-probe LSH: Efficient
indexing for high-dimensional similarity search. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Very Large DataBases, pp. 950–961. 118
M. S. Magnusson. 2000. Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and
their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32(1): 93–110.
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200792. 187
R. Maher and J. Beauchamp. 1994. Fundamental frequency estimation of musical signals
using a two-way mismatch procedure. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
95(4): 2254–2263. DOI: 10.1121/1.408685. 37
Y. Malkov, A. Ponomarenko, A. Logvinov, and V. Krylov. 2014. Approximate nearest neighbor
algorithm based on navigable small world graphs. Information Systems, 45: 61–68.
DOI: 10.1016/j.is.2013.10.006. 133
Y. A. Malkov and D. A. Yashunin. March 2016. Efficient and robust approximate nearest
neighbor search using hierarchical navigable small world graphs. arXiv:1603.09320.
133
M. Mandel and D. P. W. Ellis. Sept. 2008. Multiple-instance learning for music information
retrieval. In Proceedings ISMIR, pp. 577–582. Philadelphia, PA. http://www.ee
.columbia.edu/~dpwe/pubs/MandelE08-MImusic.pdf. 38
M. I. Mandel and D. P. W. Ellis. Sept. 2005. Song-level features and support vector machines
for music classification. In Proceedings International Conference on Music Information
Retrieval ISMIR, pp. 594–599. London. http://www.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/pubs/
ismir05-svm.pdf. 38
C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. 2008. Introduction to Information Retrieval.
Cambridge University Press. 116
Y. Mao and M. Wu. 2006. A joint signal processing and cryptographic approach to multimedia
encryption. Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 15(7): 2061–2075.
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2006.873426. 92, 93, 96
O. Maron and T. Lozano-Perez. 1998. A framework for multiple-instance learning. In
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 570–576. 48
M. Marszalek, I. Laptev, and C. Schmid. 2009. Actions in context. In CVPR. pp. 2929–2936.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206557. 21
J. Martinez, H. H. Hoos, and J. J. Little. 2014. Stacked quantizers for compositional vector
compression. arXiv:1411.2173. 131
I. Martı́nez-Ponte, X. Desurmont, J. Meessen, and J.-F. Delaigle. 2005. Robust human face
hiding ensuring privacy. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Image Analysis
for Multimedia Interactive Services, p. 4. DOI: 10.1.1.72.4758. 91
B. Matei, Y. Shan, H. Sawhney, Y. Tan, R. Kumar, D. Huber, and M. Hebert. July 2006.
Rapid object indexing using locality sensitive hashing and joint 3D-signature space
estimation. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 28(7): 1111–1126. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2006.148. 105
Bibliography
349
A. Matic, V. Osmani, A. Maxhuni, and O. Mayora. 2012. Multi-modal mobile sensing of social
interactions. In PervasiveHealth. (Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare),
IEEE, May 2012. DOI: 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2012.248689. 55
A. Matviienko, A. Löcken, A. El Ali, W. Heuten, and S. Boll. 2016. NaviLight: Investigating
ambient light displays for turn-by-turn navigation in cars. In Proceedings of the 18th
International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and
Services, pp. 283–294. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2935334.2935359. 188
J. McCarthy, and P. Hayes. 1968. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial
intelligence. Stanford University: Stanford Artificial Intelligence Project. 165, 167
W. McCulloch and W. Pitts. 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.
Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5(4): 115–133. DOI: 10.1007/BF02478259. 5
MediaEval. 2010. MediaEval’s video CLEF-Placing task. http://www.multimediaeval.org
/placing/placing.html. 39
D. Meilander, F. Glinka, S. Gorlatch, L. Lin, W. Zhang, X. Liao, and D. Meil. Apr. 2014.
Bringing mobile online games to clouds. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer
Communications Workshops, pp. 340–345. DOI: 10.1109/INFCOMW.2014.6849255.
308
D. K. Mellinger. 1991. Event formation and separation in musical sound. PhD thesis, CCRMA,
Stanford University. 37
Merriam-Webster. 2003. Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. 166, 167
R. Mertens, P. S. Huang, L. Gottlieb, G. Friedland, and A. Divakarian. 2011a. On the
applicability of speaker diarization to audio concept detection for multimedia
retrieval. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, pp.
446–451. DOI: 10.1109/ISM.2011.79. 43
R. Mertens, H. Lei, L. Gottlieb, G. Friedland, and A. Divakarian. 2011b. Acoustic super
models for large scale video event detection. In Proceedings of the Joint ACM Workshop
on Modeling and Representing Events, pp. 19–24. DOI: 10.1145/2072508.2072513. 36
I. Mervielde, F. De Fruyt, and S. Jarmuz. 1998. Linking openness and intellect in
childhood and adulthood. In Parental Descriptions of Child Personality: Developmental
Antecedents of the Big Five, pp. 105–126. 246
P. Messaris. 1996. Visual Persuasion: The Role of Images in Advertising. Sage Publications. 187
P. B. Miltersen, N. Nisan, S. Safra, and A. Wigderson. August 1998. On data structures and
asymmetric communication complexity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 57:
37–49. DOI: 10.1006/jcss.1998.1577. 108
D. Mishra, M. E. Zarki, A. Erbad, C.-H. Hsu, N. Venkatasubramanian, and M. El Zarki. May
2014. Clouds + games: A multifaceted approach. Internet Computing, IEEE, 18(3):
20–27. DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2014.20. 289, 290, 291
M. Mishra, A. Das, P. Kulkarni, and A. Sahoo. 2012. Dynamic resource management
using virtual machine migrations. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(9): 34–40.
DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2012.6295709. 259
350
Bibliography
S. Mishra, M.-A. Rizoiu, and L. Xie. 2016. Feature driven and point process approaches
for popularity prediction. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference
on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1069–1078. DOI: 10.1145/2983323
.2983812. 209, 211, 213
M. Mohanty, P. K. Atrey, and W.-T. Tsang. 2012. Secure cloud-based medical data
visualization over cloud. In Proceedings of ACM International Conference on Multimedia,
pp. 1105–1108. DOI: 10.1145/2393347.2396394. 89, 90
M. Mohanty, W.-T. Tsang, and P. K. Atrey. 2013. Scale me, crop me, know me not: Supporting
scaling and cropping in secret image sharing. In IEEE International Conference on
Multimedia and Expo, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2013.6607567. 89, 90
D. Moise, D. Shestakov, G. P. Gudmundsson, and L. Amsaleg. April 2013. Indexing and
searching 100M images with Map-Reduce. In ICMR, pp. 17–24. DOI: 10.1145/2461466
.2461470. 113
J. Møller and J. G. Rasmussen. 2005. Perfect simulation of Hawkes processes. Advances in
Applied Probability, 37(3): 629–646. DOI: 10.1017/S0001867800000392. 208
M. Montanari, S. Mehrotra, and N. Venkatasubramanian. 2007. Architecture for an
automatic customized warning system. In 2007 IEEE Intelligence and Security
Informatics, pp. 32–39. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ISI.2007.379530. 177, 182
J. A. Moorer. 1975. On the Segmentation and Analysis of Continuous Musical Sound by Digital
Computer. PhD thesis, Department of Music, Stanford University. 37
N. Moray and T. Sheridan. 2004. Oil sont les neiges d’antan? In Human Performance,
Situation Awareness and Automation II. D. A. Vincenzi, H. Mouloua, and P. Hancock,
eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Marwah NJ. 165, 167
C. Moreno, N. Tizon, and M. Preda. 2012. Mobile cloud convergence in GaaS: A business
model proposition. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science
(HICSS), pp. 1344–1352. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.433. 290
C. P. Moreno, A. G. Antolı́n, and F. D. Fernando. 2001. Recognizing voice over IP: A
robust front-end for speech recognition on the world wide web. Proceedings of
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 3(2): 209–218. DOI: 10.1109/6046.923820. 97
P. J. Moreno, B. Raj, and R. M. Stern. 1996. A vector taylor series approach for environmentindependent speech recognition. In 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,
Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 2, pp. 733–736. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP
.1996.543225. 36
F. Morstatter, J. Pfeffer, H. Liu, and K. M. Carley. 2013. Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose.
http://scholar.google.de/scholar.bib?q=info:NkS2afIrqyQJ:scholar.google.com
/&output=citation&hl=de&as_sdt=0,5&ct=citation&cd=0. 144
M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. February 2009. Fast approximate nearest neighbors with automatic
algorithm configuration. In VISAPP, pp. 331–340. DOI: 10.5220/0001787803310340.
116, 117
Bibliography
351
M. Muja and D. G. Lowe. 2014. Scalable nearest neighbor algorithms for high dimensional
data. IEEE Trans. PAMI, p. 36. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2321376. 117
M. Müller, D. P. W. Ellis, A. Klapuri, and G. Richard. Oct. 2011. Signal processing for
music analysis. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 5(6): 1088–1110.
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=5709966. DOI: 10.1109/JSTSP
.2011.2112333. 38
E. Murphy-Chutorian and M. M. Trivedi. 2009. Head pose estimation in computer vision: A
survey. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 31(4): 607–626. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.106. 219
B. Myers, S. Hudson, and R. Pausch. 2000. Past, present, and future of user interface
software tools. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1): 3–28.
DOI: 10.1145/344949.344959. 170
G. Mysore, P. Smaragdis, and B. Raj. 2010. Non-negative hidden-Markov modeling of audio
with application to source separation. In Proceedings of 9th International Conference
on Latent Variable Analysis and Source Separation (LVA/ICA), pp. 140–148. 37
M. Naaman. 2012. Social multimedia: Highlighting opportunities for search and mining
of multimedia data in social media applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications,
56(1): 9–34. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-010-0538-7. 145
X. Naturel and P. Gros. June 2008. Detecting repeats for video structuring. Multimedia Tools
and Applications, 38: 233–252. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-007-0180-1. 120
A. Nazari Shirehjini. 2006. Situation modelling: A domain analysis and user study. In 2nd IET
International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 2006, volume 2, pp. 193–199. IET.
DOI: 10.1049/cp:20060695. 165
R.-A. Negoescu and D. Gatica-Perez. 2010. Modeling Flickr communities through
probabilistic topic-based analysis. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 12(5): 399–416.
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2010.2050649. 148
E. M. Newton, L. Sweeney, and B. Malin. 2005. Preserving privacy by de-identifying face
images. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(2): 232–243.
DOI: 10.1109/TKDE.2005.32. 92, 93
B. Neyshabur and N. Srebro. 2015. On symmetric and asymmetric LSHs for inner product
search. In ICML, pp. 1926–1934. 133
J. Y.-H. Ng, M. Hausknecht, S. Vijayanarasimhan, O. Vinyals, R. Monga, and G. Toderici.
2015. Beyond short snippets: Deep networks for video classification. In CVPR,
pp. 4694–4702. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299101. 12, 24
W. Ng. 2009. Clarifying the relation between neuroticism and positive emotions. Personality
and Individual Differences, 47(1): 69–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.01.049. 244
J. C. Niebles, H. Wang, and L. Fei-Fei. 2008. Unsupervised learning of human action
categories using spatial-temporal words. International Journal of Computer Vision,
79(3): 299–318. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-007-0122-4. 47
352
Bibliography
J. C. Niebles, C.-W. Chen, and L. Fei-Fei. 2010. Modeling temporal structure of decomposable
motion segments for activity classification. In ECCV, pp. 392–405. DOI: 10.1007/9783-642-15552-9_29. 21
D. Nistér and H. Stewénius. June 2006. Scalable recognition with a vocabulary tree. In CVPR,
pp. 2161–2168. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.264. 116
M. Norouzi and D. Fleet. June 2013. Cartesian k-means. In CVPR, pp. 3017–3024.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.388. 131
C. Norris, J. Moran, and G. Armstrong (eds.). 1998. CCTV: A new battleground for privacy.
Surveillance, closed-circuit television and social control, pp. 243–254. 91
M. Nouh, A. Almaatouq, A. Alabdulkareem, V. K. Singh, E. Shmueli, M. Alsaleh, A. Alarifi,
A. Alfaris, and A. S. Pentland. 2014. Social information leakage: Effects of awareness
and peer pressure on user behavior. In Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy,
and Trust, pp. 352–360. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07620-1_31. 188
E. Nowak, F. Jurie, and B. Triggs. 2006. Sampling strategies for bag-of-features image
classification. Computer Vision–ECCV 2006, pp. 490–503. DOI: 10.1007/11744085_38.
167
Y. Ogata. 1981. On Lewis’ simulation method for point processes. IEEE Transactions on
Information Theory, 27(1): 23–31. DOI: 10.1109/TIT.1981.1056305. 202, 204, 209
Y. Ogata. 1988. Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for
point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(401). DOI: 10.1080
/01621459.1988.10478560. 200, 209
Y. Ogata, R. S. Matsuúra, and K. Katsura. 1993. Fast likelihood computation of epidemic
type aftershock-sequence model. Geophysical Research Letters, 20(19): 2143–2146.
DOI: 10.1029/93GL02142. 209
A. Ojala and P. Tyrvainen. Jul. 2011. Developing cloud business models: A case study on
cloud gaming. IEEE Software, 28(4): 42–47. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03
/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5741005. DOI: 10.1109/MS.2011.51. 290
A. Oliva and A. Torralba. 2001. Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of
the spatial envelope. IJCV, 42(3): 145–175. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011139631724. 132
D. Omercevic, O. Drbohlav, and A. Leonardis. October 2007. High-dimensional feature
matching: employing the concept of meaningful nearest neighbors. In ICCV, pp. 1–8
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408880. 106
OnLive. January 2015. OnLive web page. http://www.onlive.com/. 287, 291
M. Osadchy, B. Pinkas, A. Jarrous, and B. Moskovich. 2010. SCiFI—A system for secure face
identification. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 239–254.
DOI: 10.1109/SP.2010.39. 94, 96
P. Over, G. Awad, M. Michel, J. Fiscus, G. Sanders, W. Kraaij, A. F. Smeaton, and G. Quéenot.
2014. TRECVID 2014—An overview of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms
and metrics. In Proceedings of TRECVID 2014, National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST). 19, 21, 23
Bibliography
353
P. Over, G. Awad, M. Michel, J. Fiscus, W. Kraaij, A. F. Smeaton, G. Quéenot, and R. Ordelman.
2015. TRECVID 2015—An overview of the goals, tasks, data, evaluation mechanisms
and metrics. In Proceedings of TRECVID 2015, NIST. 23
T. Ozaki. 1979. Maximum likelihood estimation of Hawkes’ self-exciting point processes.
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 31(1): 145–155. DOI: 10.1007
/BF02480272. 198
P. Paillier. 1999. Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes.
In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Theory and Application of
Cryptographic Techniques, volume 1592 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science,
pp. 223–238. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48910-X_16. 79, 87
Y. Pan, T. Yao, T. Mei, H. Li, C.-W. Ngo, and Y. Rui. 2014. Click-through-based crossview learning for image search. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 717–726. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2600428.2609568. 17, 148
Y. Pan, Y. Li, T. Yao, T. Mei, H. Li, and Y. Rui. 2016a. Learning deep intrinsic video
representation by exploring temporal coherence and graph structure. In International
Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 3832–3838. 14
Y. Pan, T. Mei, T. Yao, H. Li, and Y. Rui. 2016b. Jointly modeling embedding and translation
to bridge video and language. In CVPR, pp. 4594–4602. 15, 16, 17, 28
Y. Pan, T. Yao, H. Li, and T. Mei. 2016c. Video captioning with transferred semantic attributes.
arXiv:1611.07675. 17
S. Pancoast and M. Akbacak. 2011. Bag-of-audio-words approach for multimedia event
classification. In Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 2105–2108. 46
P. F. Panter and W. Dite. Jan. 1951. Quantizing distortion in pulse-count modulation with
nonuniform spacing of levels. Proceedings IRE, 39: 44–48. DOI: 10.1109/JRPROC.1951
.230419. 117
M. Pantic, N. Sebe, J. F. Cohn, and T. Huang. 2005. Affective multimodal human-computer
interaction. In ACMMM, pp. 669–676. 52
D. P. Papadopoulos, A. D. F. Clarke, F. Keller, and V. Ferrari. 2014. Training object class
detectors from eye tracking data. In ECCV, pp. 361–376. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-31910602-1_24. 220, 226
K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu. 2002. Bleu: A method for automatic evaluation
of machine translation. In ACL, pp. 311–318. DOI: 10.3115/1073083.1073135. 27
O. M. Parkhi, A. Vedaldi, C. V. Jawahar, and A. Zisserman. 2011. The truth about cats
and dogs. 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1427–1434. DOI:
10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126398. 227
D. Parkhurst and E. Niebur. 2003. Scene content selected by active vision. Spatial Vision,
16(2): 125–54. DOI: 10.1163/15685680360511645. 230
354
Bibliography
P. Patel, A. Ranabahu, and A. Sheth. 2009. Service level agreement in cloud computing.
In Proceedings of International Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems,
Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA), 1(1–10). 260
M. A. Pathak and B. Raj. March 2012. Privacy-preserving speaker verification as password
matching. In ICASSP, pp. 1849–1852. 105
M. Pathak and B. Raj. 2013. Privacy-preserving speaker verification and identification
using gaussian mixture models. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language
Processing, 21(2): 397–406. DOI: 10.1109/TASL.2012.2215602. 99, 100
L. Paulevé, H. Jégou, and L. Amsaleg. Aug. 2010. Locality sensitive hashing: A comparison
of hash function types and querying mechanisms. Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(11):
1348–1358. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.04.004. 110, 116, 118, 119, 132
E. M. M. Peck, B. F. Yuksel, A. Ottley, R. J. Jacob, and R. Chang. 2013. Using fNIRS brain
sensing to evaluate information visualization interfaces. In ACM Conference on Human
Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 473–482. DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2010.04.004. 251
M. Perugini and L. Di Blas. 2002. Analyzing personality-related adjectives from an eticemic
perspective: The big five marker scale (BFMS) and the Italian AB5C taxonomy. Big
Five Assessment, pp. 281–304. 222, 238, 240
R. J. Peters, A. Iyer, L. Itti, and C. Koch. 2005. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in
natural images. Vision Research, 45(8): 2397–2416. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.03.019.
231
S. Petridis, B. Martinez, and M. Pantic. 2013. The MAHNOB laughter database. Image and
Vision Computing, 31(2): 186–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2012.08.014. 55
T. T. Pham, S. Hamid Rezatofighi, I. Reid, and T.-J. Chin. 2016. Efficient point process
inference for large-scale object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2837–2845. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016
.310. 193
J. Philbin, O. Chum, M. Isard, J. Sivic, and A. Zisserman. June 2008. Lost in quantization:
Improving particular object retrieval in large scale image databases. In CVPR, pp. 1–8.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587635. 116, 119
A. Pikrakis, T. Giannakopoulos, and S. Theodoridis. 2008. Gunshot detection in audio
streams from movies by means of dynamic programming and Bayesian networks. In
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, pp. 21–24.
IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4517536. 38
J. K. Pillai, V. M. Patel, R. Chellappa, and N. K. Ratha. 2011. Secure and robust iris recognition
using random projections and sparse representations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 33(9): 1877–1893. 82
A. Piva and S. Katzenbeisser. 2008. Special issue on signal processing in the encrypted
domain. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, EURASIP Journal on Information Security
(eds.), 2007. DOI: 10.1155/2007/82790. 77
Bibliography
355
G. Poliner and D. P. W. Ellis. 2007. A discriminative model for polyphonic piano transcription.
EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2007(2007): 9 pages. http://www
.ee.columbia.edu/~dpwe/pubs/PoliE06-piano.pdf. DOI: 10.1155/2007/48317. Special
Issue on Music Signal Processing. 38
S. Pongpaichet, V. K. Singh, R. Jain, and A. P. Pentland. 2013. Situation fencing: making
geo-fencing personal and dynamic. In 2013 ACM International Workshop on Personal
Data Meets Distributed Multimedia. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 3–10.
DOI: 10.1145/2509352.2509401. 161, 177
R. Poppe. 2010. A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image and Vision
Computing, pp. 976–990. DOI: 10.1016/j.imavis.2009.11.014. 4
D. A. Pospelov. 1986. Situational Control: Theory and Practice (in Russian). Nauka. 165
I. Potamitis, S. Ntalampiras, O. Jahn, and K. Riede. 2014. Automatic bird sound detection
in long real-field recordings: Applications and tools. Applied Acoustics, 80: 1–9.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.01.001. 38
J. Pouwelse, P. Garbacki, D. Epema, and H. Sips. 2005. The Bittorrent P2P file-sharing system:
Measurements and analysis. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer
Systems (IPTPS), pp. 205–216. DOI: 10.1007/11558989_19. 259
J. Prins, Z. Erkin, and R. L. Lagendijk. 2006. Literature study: Signal processing in the
encrypted domain. Technical report, Information and Communication Theory
Group, Delft University of Technology. 77
W. Puech, Z. Erkin, M. Barni, S. Rane, and R. L. Lagendijk. 2012. Emerging cryptographic
challenges in image and video processing. Proceedings of 19th IEEE International
Conference on Image Processing, pp. 2629–2632. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2012.6467438. 77,
82, 103
Z. Qin, J. Yan, K. Ren, C. W. Chen, and C. Wang. 2014. Towards efficient privacy-preserving
image feature extraction in cloud computing. In Proceedings of the ACM International
Conference on Multimedia, pp. 497–506. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2647868.2654941. 87, 90
F. Qiu and J. Cho. 2006. Automatic identification of user interest for personalized search. In
Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 727–736. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1135777.1135883. 147
Z. Qiu, T. Yao, and T. Mei. 2016. Deep quantization: Encoding convolutional activations with
deep generative model. arXiv:1611.09502. 9
J. Rabin, J. Delon, and Y. Gousseau. Dec. 2008. A contrario matching of SIFT-like descriptors.
In ICPR, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2008.4761371. 106
J. Rabin, J. Delon, and Y. Gousseau. Sep. 2009. A statistical approach to the matching of local
features. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2(3): 931–958. DOI: 10.1137/090751359.
106
M. Radovanović, A. Nanopoulos, and M. Ivanović. Dec. 2010. Hubs in space: Popular
nearest neighbors in high-dimensional data. Journal of Machine Learning Research,
11: 2487–2531. 106
356
Bibliography
M. Raginsky and S. Lazebnik. 2010. Locality-sensitive binary codes from shift-invariant
kernels. In NIPS, pp. 1509–1517. 122
A. Rahimi and B. Recht. 2007. Random features for large-scale kernel machines. In NIPS,
pp. 1177–1184. 122
B. Raj and R. M. Stern. 2005. Missing-feature approaches in speech recognition. Signal
Processing Magazine, IEEE, 22(5): 101–116. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2005.1511828. 36
B. Raj, T. Virtanen, S. Chaudhuri, and R. Singh. 2010a. Non-negative matrix factorization
based compensation of music for automatic speech recognition. In Proceedings of
Interspeech, pp. 717–720. 37
B. Raj, T. Virtanen, S. Chaudhuri, and R. Singh. 2010b. Ungrounded non-negative
independent factor analysis. In Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 330–333. 37
B. Raj, R. Singh, and T. Virtanen. 2011. Phoneme-dependent NMF for speech enhancement
in monaural mixtures. In Proceedings of Interspeech, pp. 1217–1220. 37
A. K. Rajagopal, R. Subramanian, R. L. Vieriu, E. Ricci, O. Lanz, K. Ramakrishnan, and
N. Sebe. 2012. An adaptation framework for head-pose classification in dynamic
multi-view scenarios. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision (ACCV), pp. 652–666.
Springer Berlin Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-37444-9_51. 57
A. K. Rajagopal, R. Subramanian, E. Ricci, R. L. Vieriu, O. Lanz, and N. Sebe. 2014.
Exploring transfer learning approaches for head pose classification from multiview surveillance images. IJCV, 109(1–2): 146–167. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-013-0692-2.
57
U. Rajashekar, I. van der Linde, A. C. Bovik, and L. K. Cormack. 2008. GAFFE: A gaze-attentive
fixation finding engine. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 17(4): 564–573.
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2008.917218. 231
S. Rane and M. Barni. 2011. Special session on secure signal processing. Proceedings of
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (co-chaired),
pp. 5848–5871. 77
J. Rasmussen, 2011. Temporal point processes: The conditional intensity function.
http://people.math.aau.dk/~jgr/teaching/punktproc11/tpp.pdf. 206
J. G. Rasmussen. 2013. Bayesian inference for Hawkes processes. Methodology and Computing
in Applied Probability, 15(3): 623–642. DOI: 10.1007/s11009-011-9272-5. 206, 208
A. S. Razavian, H. Azizpour, J. Sullivan, and S. Carlsson. 2014. CNN features off-theshelf: An astounding baseline for recognition. In CVPR Workshop, pp. 512–519.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2014.131. 9
R. Reiter. 2001. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing
Dynamical Systems. MIT Press. 165
E. Ricci, G. Zen, N. Sebe, and S. Messelodi. 2013. A prototype learning framework
using EMD: Application to complex scenes analysis. IEEE TPAMI, 35(3): 513–526.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.131. 55
Bibliography
357
E. Ricci, J. Varadarajan, R. Subramanian, S. Rota Bulo, N. Ahuja, and O. Lanz. 2015.
Uncovering interactions and interactors: Joint estimation of head, body orientation and f-formations from surveillance videos. In IEEE ICCV, pp. 4660–4668.
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.529. 57, 70, 71, 72, 73
L. Riungu-Kalliosaari, J. Kasurinen, and K. Smolander. 2011. Cloud services and cloud
gaming in game development. IADIS International Conference Game and Entertainment
Technologies 2013 (GET 2013), (1). 290
R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman. 1978. A method for obtaining digital signatures
and public-key cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM, 21(2): 120–126.
DOI: 10.1145/359340.359342. 79
M.-A. Rizoiu, L. Xie, S. Sanner, M. Cebrian, H. Yu, and P. Van Hentenryck. 2017. Expecting
to be HIP: Hawkes intensity processes for social media popularity. In International
Conference on World Wide Web 2017, pp. 1–9. Perth, Australia. http://arxiv.org/abs
/1602.06033. DOI: 10.1145/3038912.3052650. 198
N. Robertson and I. Reid. 2006. Estimating gaze direction from low-resolution faces in video.
In ECCV, pp. 402–415. DOI: 10.1007/11744047_31. 57
A. Rohrbach, M. Rohrbach, W. Qiu, A. Friedrich, M. Pinkal, and B. Schiele. 2014. Coherent
multi-sentence video description with variable level of detail. In GCPR, pp. 184–195.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-11752-2_15. 16, 26, 27, 29
A. Rohrbach, M. Rohrbach, and B. Schiele. 2015a. The long-short story of movie description.
In GCPR, pp. 209–221. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24947-6_17. 28
A. Rohrbach, M. Rohrbach, N. Tandon, and B. Schiele. 2015b. A dataset for movie description.
In CVPR, pp. 3202–3212. 26, 27, 28
M. Rohrbach, W. Qiu, I. Titov, S. Thater, M. Pinkal, and B. Schiele. 2013. Translating
video content to natural language descriptions. In ICCV, pp. 433–440. DOI: 10.1109
/ICCV.2013.61. 16, 29
M. Rohrbach, A. Rohrbach, M. Regneri, S. Amin, M. Andriluka, M. Pinkal, and B. Schiele.
2015c. Recognizing fine-grained and composite activities using hand-centric features
and script data. IJCV, 119(3): 346–373. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-015-0851-8. 26
R. C. Rose and D. B. Paul. 1990. A hidden Markov model based keyword recognition
system. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and
Signal Processing, pp. 129–132. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.1990.115555. 95, 98
P. Ross. Mar. 2009. Cloud Computing’s Killer App: Gaming. IEEE Spectrum, 46(3):
14. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4795441.
DOI: 10.1109/MSPEC.2009.4795441. 289
H. A. Rowley, S. Baluja, and T. Kanade. 1998. Neural network-based face detection. IEEE
TPAMI, 20(1): 23–38. DOI: 10.1109/34.655647. 225
Y. Rui, T. S. Huang, M. Ortega, and S. Mehrotra. 1998. Relevance feedback: A power tool for
interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
for Video Technology, 8(5): 644–655. DOI: 10.1109/76.718510. 148
358
Bibliography
O. Russakovsky, J. Deng, H. Su, J. Krause, S. Satheesh, S. Ma, Z. Huang, A. Karpathy, A. Khosla,
M. Bernstein, et al. 2015. Image Net large scale visual recognition challenge. IJCV,
115(3): 211–252. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y. 3
B. C. Russell, A. Torralba, K. P. Murphy, and W. T. Freeman. 2008. Labelme: A database and
web-based tool for image annotation. IJCV, 77(1–3): 157–173. DOI: 10.1007/s11263007-0090-8. 220
J. Russell. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
39: 1161–1178. DOI: 10.1037/h0077714. 236
M. Ryynanen and A. Klapuri. April 2008. Query by humming of midi and audio using locality
sensitive hashing. In ICASSP, pp. 2249–2252. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518093.
105
A. Sablayrolles, M. Douze, N. Usunier, and H. Jégou. 2016. How should we evaluate supervised
hashing? arXiv:1609.06753. 121
A. R. Sadeghi, T. Schneider, and I. Wehrenberg. 2010. Efficient privacy-preserving face
recognition. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Information, Security
and Cryptology, volume 5984 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 229–244.
Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14423-3_16. 94, 96
S. Saeger, B. Elizalde, C. Schulze, D. Borth, B. Raj, and I. Lane. 2016, under review. Audio
content descriptors. IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing. 48
M. S. SaghaianNejadEsfahani, Y. Luo, and S.-C. Sen. 2012. Privacy protected image denoising
with secret shares. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Conference on Image
Processing, pp. 253–256. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2012.6466843. 89, 90
M. Saini, P. K. Atrey, S. Mehrotra, and M. S. Kankanhalli. 2012. W 3-Privacy: Understanding
what, when, and where inference channels in multi-camera surveillance video.
Springer International Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications, 68(17): 135–158.
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-012-1207-9. 75
M. Saini, P. K. Atrey, S. Mehrotra, and M. S. Kankanhalli. 2013. Privacy aware publication
of surveillance video. Inderscience International Journal of Trust Management in
Computing and Communications, 1(1): 23–51. DOI: 10.1504/IJTMCC.2013.052523. 92,
93
H. Samet. 2007. Foundations of Multidimensional and Metric Data Structures. Elsevier. 107
J. Sánchez, F. Perronnin, T. Mensink, and J. Verbeek. 2013. Image classification with the
Fisher vector: Theory and practice. IJCV, 105(3): 222–245. DOI: 10.1007/s11263-0130636-x. 9
T. Sander and C. Tschudin. 1998. On software protection via function hiding. In Information
Hiding, volume 1525 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 111–123. Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-49380-8_9. 81
H. Sandhawalia and H. Jégou. March 2010. Searching with expectations. In ICASSP, Signal
Processing, pp. 1242–1245. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495403. 123, 128
Bibliography
359
B. Sankaran. 2010. A survey of unsupervised grammar induction. Manuscript, Simon Fraser
University. 47
A. Santella and D. DeCarlo. 2004. Robust clustering of eye movement recordings
for quantification of visual interest. In Symposium on Eye Tracking Research &
Applications, pp. 27–34. DOI: 10.1145/968363.968368. 223
T. S. Saponas, J. Lester, C. Hartung, S. Agarwal, and T. Kohno. 2007. Devices that tell on you:
Privacy trends in consumer ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual
USENIX Security Symposium, volume 3, pp. 55–70. 97
F. Sarmenta. 2001. Volunteer computing. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology. 258
N. Sarter and D. Woods. 1991. Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon.
The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1(1): 45–57.
DOI: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0101_4. 166, 167
M. Satyanarayanan, P. Bahl, R. Caceres, and N. Davies. 2009. The case for VM-based cloudlets
in mobile computing. IEEE Transactions on Pervasive Computing, 8(4): 14–24.
DOI: 10.1109/MPRV.2009.82. 259, 261
M. Schneider and T. Schneider. 2014. Notes on non-interactive secure comparison in
image feature extraction in the encrypted domain with privacy-preserving SIFT. In
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security,
pp. 135–140. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2600918.2600927. 87
C. Schuldt, I. Laptev, and B. Caputo. 2004. Recognizing human actions: A local SVM
approach. In ICPR, pp. 32–36. DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2004.747. 20
N. Sebe, I. Cohen, T. Gevers, and T. S. Huang. 2006. Emotion recognition based on joint
visual and audio cues. In International Conference on Pattern Recognition, volume 1,
pp. 1136–1139. DOI: 10.1109/ICPR.2006.489. 221
M. L. Seltzer, B. Raj, and R. M. Stern. 2004. Likelihood-maximizing beamforming for robust
hands-free speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing,
12(5): 489–498. DOI: 10.1109/TSA.2004.832988. 36
A. Senior, S. Pankanti, A. Hampapur, L. Brown, Y.-L. Tian, and A. Ekin. 2003. Blinkering
surveillance: Enabling video privacy through computer vision. Technical report, IBM.
92, 93
F. Setti, O. Lanz, R. Ferrario, V. Murino, and M. Cristani. 2013. Multi-scale F-formation
discovery for group detection. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Image
Processing (ICIP), pp. 3547–3551. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2013.6738732. 52, 69, 71
F. Setti, C. Russell, C. Bassetti, and M. Cristani. 2015. F-formation detection: Individuating
free-standing conversational groups in images. PloS ONE, 10(5). DOI: 10.1371/journal
.pone.0123783. 69, 70, 71
H. Shacham and B. Waters. 2008. Compact proofs of retrievability. Journal of Cryptology,
26(3): 442–483. DOI: 10.1007/s00145-012-9129-2. 260
360
Bibliography
G. Shakhnarovich, T. Darrell, and P. Indyk. March 2006. Nearest-Neighbor Methods in Learning
and Vision: Theory and Practice, chapter 3. MIT Press. 105
S. Sharma, R. Kiros, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2015. Action recognition using visual attention.
arXiv:1511.04119. 13
J. Shashank, P. Kowshik, K. Srinathan, and C. Jawahar. 2008. Private content based image
retrieval. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587388. 84, 86, 91, 93
M. V. Shashanka and P. Smaragdis. 2006. Secure sound classification: Gaussian mixture
models. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal
Processing, volume 3, pp. 1088–1091. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2006.1660847.
99, 100
M. Shashanka, B. Raj, and P. Smaragdis. May 2008. Probabilistic latent variable models
as non-negative factorizations. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, article
947438. DOI: 10.1155/2008/947438. 37
R. Shea, J. Liu, E. C. Ngai, and Y. Cui. 2013. Cloud gaming: Architecture and performance.
IEEE Network, 27(August): 16–21. DOI: 10.1109/MNET.2013.6574660. 301
R. Shea, S. Member, D. Fu, S. Member, J. Liu, and S. Member. 2015. Cloud gaming:
Understanding the support from advanced virtualization and hardware. IEEE
Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 25(12): 2026–2037.
DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2015.2450172. 299, 301, 302, 305
A. Sheh and D. P. Ellis. 2003. Chord segmentation and recognition using EM-trained hidden
Markov models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information
Retrieval ISMIR-03, http://doi.org/10.7916/D8TB1H83. DOI: 10.7916/D8TB1H83. 37,
38
S. Shekhar, P. R. Schrater, R. R. Vatsavai, W. Wu, and S. Chawla. 2002. Spatial contextual
classification and prediction models for mining geospatial data. IEEE Transactions
on Multimedia, 4(2): 174–188. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2002.1017732. 186
P. Shenoy and D. S. Tan. 2008. Human-aided computing: Utilizing implicit human processing
to classify images. In ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
pp. 845–854. DOI: 10.1145/1357054.1357188. 220
B. Sheridan. March 9, 2009. A trillion points of data. Newsweek, 34–37. 162
S. Shi, C.-H. Hsu, K. Nahrstedt, and R. Campbell. 2011. Using graphics rendering contexts
to enhance the real-time video coding for mobile cloud gaming. Proceedings of the
19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, p. 103. http://dl.acm.org/citation
.cfm?doid=2072298.2072313. DOI: 10.1145/2072298.2072313. 307
E. Shmueli, V. K. Singh, B. Lepri, and A. Pentland. 2014. Sensing, understanding, and
shaping social behavior. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 1(1):
22–34. DOI: 10.1109/TCSS.2014.2307438. 186
T. Shortell and A. Shokoufandeh. 2015. Secure brightness/contrast filter using fully
homomorphic encryption. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on
Bibliography
361
Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 346–347. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2737095
.2742922. 89, 90
J. Shotton, A. Fitzgibbon, A. Blake, A. Kipman, M. Finocchio, B. Moore, and T. Sharp.
2013. Real-time human pose recognition in parts from single depth images.
Communications of the ACM, 56(1): 116–124. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995316.
56
A. Shrivastava and P. Li. 2014. Asymmetric LSH for sublinear time maximum inner product
search. In NIPS, pp. 2321–2329. 133
H. T. Siegelmann and E. D. Sontag. 1991. Turing computability with neural nets. Applied
Mathematics Letters, 4(6): 77–80. DOI: 10.1.1.47.8383. 6
S. Siersdorfer, J. S. Pedro, and M. Sanderson. 2009. Automatic video tagging using content
redundancy. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and
Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 395–402. DOI: 10.1145/1571941.1572010.
15
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. 2014. Two-stream convolutional networks for action
recognition in videos. In NIPS, 568–576. 10, 11, 12, 24
K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman. 2015. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale
image recognition. In ICLR, pp. 1–14. 5, 9, 16
K. Simonyan, A. Vedaldi, and A. Zisserman. 2013. Learning local feature descriptors
using convex optimisation. Technical report, Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford. 124
R. Singh, B. Raj, and P. Smaragdis. 2010a. Latent-variable decomposition based dereverberation of monaural and multi-channel signals. In Proceedings of IEEE International
Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 1914–1917.
DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495326. 37
V. Singh and R. Agarwal. 2016. Cooperative phoneotypes: Exploring phone-based behavioral
markers of cooperation. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on
Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 646–657. DOI: 10.1145/2971648.2971755. 186
V. Singh and R. Jain. 2009b. Situation based control for cyber-physical environments. In
Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) 2009. IEEE, pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1109
/MILCOM.2009.5380000. 166, 167, 185
V. Singh, H. Pirsiavash, I. Rishabh, and R. Jain. 2009a. Towards environment-to-environment
(E2E) multimedia communication systems. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 44(3):
361–388. DOI: 10.1007/s11042-009-0281-0. 185
V. Singh, M. Gao, and R. Jain. 2010b. Event analytics on microblogs. In Proceedings of the
ACM Web Science Conference, pp. 1–4. ACM. 185
V. Singh, M. Gao, and R. Jain. 2010c. From microblogs to social images: Event analytics for
situation assessment. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia
Information Retrieval, pp. 433–436. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1743384.1743460. 185
362
Bibliography
V. K. Singh and R. Jain. 2016. Situation Recognition Using Eventshop. Springer. 161, 162, 170,
172, 175, 177, 183, 185
V. K. Singh, R. Jain, and M. S. Kankanhalli. 2009b. Motivating contributors in social media
networks. In Proceedings of the First SIGMM Workshop on Social Media, pp. 11–18. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1631144.1631149. 162
V. K. Singh, M. Gao, and R. Jain. 2010d. Situation detection and control using spatiotemporal analysis of microblogs. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference
on World Wide Web, pp. 1181–1182. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772864. 161, 185
V. K. Singh, M. Gao, and R. Jain. 2010e. Social pixels: Genesis and evaluation. In
Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 481–490. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1873951.1874030. 174, 183, 185
V. K. Singh, M. Gao, and R. Jain. 2012. Situation recognition: An evolving problem for
heterogeneous dynamic big multimedia data. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1209–1218. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2393347
.2396421. 161, 176, 183, 185
V. K. Singh, T.-S. Chua, R. Jain, and A. S. Pentland. 2013. Summary abstract for the 1st
ACM international workshop on personal data meets distributed multimedia.
In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1105–
1106. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2503836. 189
V. K. Singh, A. Mani, and A. Pentland. 2014. Social persuasion in online and physical
networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 102(12): 1903–1910. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2014
.2363986. 161, 187
V. K. Singh, S. Pongpaichet, and R. Jain. 2016. Situation recognition from multimodal data.
In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval,
pp. 1–2. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2911996.2930061. 189
J. Sivic and A. Zisserman. Oct. 2003. Video Google: A text retrieval approach to object
matching in videos. In ICCV, pp. 1470–1477. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2003.1238663. 114,
116
M. Slaney, Y. Lifshits, and J. He. September 2012. Optimal parameters for locality-sensitive
hashing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(9): 2604–2623. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2012
.2193849. 115, 117
I. Slivar, M. Suznjevic, L. Skorin-Kapov, and M. Matijasevic. Dec. 2014. Empirical QoE study
of in-home streaming of online games. In 2014 13th Annual Workshop on Network
and Systems Support for Games (NetGames), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/NetGames.2014
.7010133. 296
C. Slobogin. 2002. Public privacy: Camera surveillance of public places and the right to
anonymity. Mississippi Law Journal, 72: 213–301. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.364600. 91
P. Smaragdis. 1998. Blind separation of convolved mixtures in the frequency domain.
Neurocomputing, 22(1): 21–34. DOI: 10.1109/ASPAA.1997.625609. 36
Bibliography
363
P. Smaragdis and B. Raj. 2010. The Markov selection model for concurrent speech
recognition. In IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP),
pp. 214–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2011.09.014. 37
P. Smaragdis and B. Raj. 2011. Missing data imputation for time-frequency representation
of audio signals. Journal of Signal Processing Systems, 65(3): 361–370. DOI: 10.1007
/s11265-010-0512-7. 37
P. Smaragdis and B. Raj. March 2012. The Markov selection model for concurrent speech
recognition. Neurocomputing, 80: 64–72. DOI: 10.1109/MLSP.2010.5588124. 37
P. Smaragdis, B. Raj, and M. Shashanka. 2009a. Missing data imputation for spectral audio
signals. In IEEE International Workshop for Machine Learning in Signal Processing,
pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/MLSP.2009.5306194. 37
P. Smaragdis, M. Shashanka, and B. Raj. 2009b. A sparse non-parametric approach for single
channel separation of known sounds. In Proceedings of Neural Information Processing
Systems (NIPS), pp. 1705–1713. 37
A. W. Smeulders, M. Worring, S. Santini, A. Gupta, and R. Jain. 2000. Content-based image
retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and
Machine Intelligence, 22(12): 1349–1380. DOI: 10.1109/34.895972. 85, 220
K. Smith and P. Hancock. 1995. Situation awareness is adaptive, externally directed
consciousness. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics
Society, 37(1): 137–148. DOI: 10.1518/001872095779049444. 166, 167
B. Smyth. 2007. A community-based approach to personalizing web search. Computer, 40(8):
42–50. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2007.259. 151
H. Sohn, K. Plataniotis, and Y. Ro. 2010. Privacy-preserving watch list screening in video
surveillance system. In Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Rim Conference on Multimedia,
Advances in Multimedia Information Processing, volume 6297 of Lecture Notes in
Computer Science, pp. 622–632. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15702-8_57. 94, 96
M. Soleymani, J. Lichtenauer, T. Pun, and M. Pantic. 2012. A multimodal database for
affect recognition and implicit tagging. IEEE Trans. Affective Computing, 3: 42–55.
DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.25. 221, 242, 243
O. Soliman, A. Rezgui, H. Soliman, and N. Manea. 2013. Mobile cloud gaming: Issues
and challenges. In F. Daniel, G. Papadopoulos, and P. Thiran, eds., Mobile Web
Information Systems SE - 10, volume 8093 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp.
121–128. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-40275-3. DOI: 10.1007/978-3642-40276-0_10. 290, 291
E. Solovey, P. Schermerhorn, M. Scheutz, A. Sassaroli, S. Fantini, and R. Jacob. 2012.
Brainput: Enhancing interactive systems with streaming fNIRS brain input. In ACM
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2193–2202. DOI: 10.1145
/2207676.2208372. 251
D. Song, D. Wagner, and A. Perig. 2000. Practical techniques for searches on encrypted
data. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp. 44–55.
DOI: 10.1109/SECPRI.2000.848445. 82
364
Bibliography
Y. Song, L.-P. Morency, and R. Davis. 2012. Multimodal human behavior analysis: Learning
correlation and interaction across modalities. In ICMI, pp. 27–30. DOI: 10.1145
/2388676.2388684. 55
Sony-Gaikai. July 2012. Cloud gaming adoption is accelerating . . . and fast! http://www
.nttcom.tv/2012/07/09/cloud-gaming-adoption-is-acceleratingand-fast/. 287
K. Soomro, A. R. Zamir, and M. Shah. 2012. UCF101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes
from videos in the wild. Computing Research Repository. http://arxiv.org/corr/home.
19, 21
T. Spindler, C. Wartmann, L. Hovestadt, D. Roth, L. V. Gool, and A. Steffen. 2008. Privacy
in video surveilled spaces. Journal of Computer Security, IOS Press, 16(2): 199–222.
DOI: 10.1145/1501434.1501469. 91, 93
N. Srivastava, E. Mansimov, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2015. Unsupervised learning of video
representations using LSTMs. In ICML, pp. 843–852. 14, 24
J. Staiano, M. Menéndez, A. Battocchi, A. De Angeli, and N. Sebe. 2012. UX_Mate: From
facial expressions to UX evaluation. In Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 741–750.
DOI: 10.1145/2317956.2318068. 251
A. Steinberg, C. Bowman, and F. White. 1999. Revisions to the JDL data fusion model.
Technical report, DTIC Document. DOI: 10.1117/12.341367. 165, 166, 167
G. Stenberg. 1992. Personality and the EEG: Arousal and emotional arousability. Personality
and Individual Differences, 13: 1097–1113. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90025-K. 244
Strategy Analytics. November 2014. Cloud gaming to reach inflection point in 2015.
http://tinyurl.com/p3z9hs2.
StreamMyGame. July 2012. StreamMyGame web page. http://streammygame.com/. 291
C. Strecha, A. M. Bronstein, M. M. Bronstein, and P. Fua. January 2012. LDAHash: Improved
matching with smaller descriptors. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 34(1): 66–78. DOI: 10.1109
/TPAMI.2011.103. 120
R. Subramanian, H. Katti, N. Sebe, M. Kankanhalli, and T.-S. Chua. 2010. An eye fixation
database for saliency detection in images. In ECCV, pp. 30–43. DOI: 10.1007/978-3642-15561-1_3. 222
R. Subramanian, V. Yanulevskaya, and N. Sebe. 2011. Can computers learn from humans
to see better?: Inferring scene semantics from viewers’ eye movements. In ACM
Multimedia, pp. 33–42. DOI: 10.1145/2072298.2072305. 221, 222, 223, 224, 225
R. Subramanian, Y. Yan, J. Staiano, O. Lanz, and N. Sebe. 2013. On the relationship
between head pose, social attention and personality prediction for unstructured and
dynamic group interactions. In Int’l Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 3–10.
DOI: 10.1145/2522848.2522862. 219, 238, 240
R. Subramanian, D. Shankar, N. Sebe, and D. Melcher. 2014. Emotion modulates eye
movement patterns and subsequent memory for the gist and details of movie scenes.
Journal of Vision, 14(3): 31. DOI: 10.1167/14.3.31. 237
Bibliography
365
R. Subramanian, J. Wache, M. Abadi, R. Vieriu, S. Winkler, and N. Sebe. 2016. ASCERTAIN:
Emotion and personality recognition using commercial sensors. IEEE Transactions
on Affective Computing, issue 99. DOI: 10.1109/TAFFC.2016.2625250. 237
Y. Sugano, Y. Matsushita, and Y. Sato. 2013. Graph-based joint clustering of fixations and
visual entities. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 10(2): 1–16. DOI: 10.1145
/2465780.2465784. 224
L. Sun, K. Jia, D.-Y. Yeung, and B. E. Shi. 2015. Human action recognition using factorized
spatio-temporal convolutional networks. In CVPR, pp. 4597–4605. DOI: 10.1109
/ICCV.2015.522. 10, 24
Y. Sutcu, Q. Li, and N. Memon. 2007. Protecting biometric templates with sketch: Theory
and practice. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2(3): 503–512.
83
I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural
networks. In NIPS, pp. 3104–3112. 16
A. Swaminathan, Y. Mao, G.-M. Su, H. Gou, A. L. Varna, S. He, M. Wu, and D. W. Oard. 2007.
Confidentiality-preserving rank-ordered search. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop
on Storage Security and Survivability, pp. 7–12. DOI: 10.1145/1314313.1314316. 82, 85
D. Szajda, M. Pohl, J. Owen, B. G. Lawson, and V. Richmond. 2006. Toward a practical
data privacy scheme for a distributed implementation of the Smith-Waterman
genome sequence comparison algorithm. In Network and Distributed System Security
Symposium (NDSS), pp. 253–265. 83
C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke,
and A. Rabinovich. 2015a. Going deeper with convolutions. In CVPR, pp. 1–9.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594. 5, 6, 9
C. Szegedy, V. Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, and Z. Wojna. 2015b. Rethinking the inception
architecture for computer vision. arXiv:1512.00567. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.308. 6
C. Szegedy, S. Ioffe, and V. Vanhoucke. 2017. Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the impact
of residual connections on learning. In AAAI, pp. 4278–4284. 6
K. Takata, J. Ma, B. Apduhan, R. Huang, and N. Shiratori. 2008. Lifelog image analysis
based on activity situation models using contexts from wearable multi sensors.
In International Conference on Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, pp. 160–
163. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/MUE.2008.69. 165
C.-C. Tan, Y.-G. Jiang, and C.-W. Ngo. 2011. Towards textually describing complex video
contents with audio-visual concept classifiers. In ACM Multimedia, 655–658.
DOI: 10.1145/2072298.2072411. 16
J. Tang, S. Yan, R. Hong, G.-J. Qi, and T.-S. Chua. 2009. Inferring semantic concepts from
community-contributed images and noisy tags. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia,
pp. 223–232. DOI: 10.1145/1631272.1631305. 47
366
Bibliography
M. Tang, P. Agrawal, S. Pongpaichet, and R. Jain. 2015. Geospatial interpolation analytics
for data streams in EventShop. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia
and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–6. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2015.7177513. 186
H. R. Tavakoli, A. Atyabi, A. Rantanen, S. J. Laukka, S. Nefti-Meziani, and J. Heikkilä. 2015.
Predicting the valence of a scene from observers’ eye movements. PLoS ONE, 10(9):
1–19. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138198. 237
G. W. Taylor, R. Fergus, Y. LeCun, and C. Bregler. 2010. Convolutional learning of spatiotemporal features. In ECCV, pp. 140–153. 13
TeamViewer. July 2012. TeamViewer web page. http://www.teamviewer.com. DOI: 10.1007
/978-3-642-15567-3_11. 291
J. Teevan, S. T. Dumais, and E. Horvitz. 2005. Personalizing search via automated analysis
of interests and activities. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR
Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 449–456. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1076034.1076111. 147
J. Teevan, S. T. Dumais, and D. J. Liebling. 2008. To personalize or not to personalize:
modeling queries with variation in user intent. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual
International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information
Retrieval, pp. 163–170. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1390334.1390364. 140
A. Temko, R. Malkin, C. Zieger, D. Macho, C. Nadeu, and M. Omologo. 2006. Acoustic event
detection and classification in smart-room environments: Evaluation of CHIL project
systems. IV Jornadas en Tecnologia del Habla, 65(48): 5. 38
J. Thomason, S. Venugopalan, S. Guadarrama, K. Saenko, and R. Mooney. 2014. Integrating
language and vision to generate natural language descriptions of videos in the
wild. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics,
pp. 1218–1227. 28
B. Thomee, D. A. Shamma, B. Elizalde, G. Friedland, K. Ni, D. Poland, D. Borth, and L. Li.
2016. YFCC100M: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM,
59(2): 64–73. 39
Y. Tian, J. Srivastava, T. Huang, and N. Contractor. 2010. Social multimedia computing.
Computer, 43(8): 27–36. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2010.188. 155
S. Tok, M. Koyuncu, S. Dural, and F. Catikkas. 2010. Evaluation of International Affective
Picture System (IAPS) ratings in an athlete population and its relations to personality.
Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5): 461–466. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.04
.020. 244, 246
I. M. Toke. 2011. An introduction to Hawkes processes with applications to finance. Lectures
Notes from Ecole Centrale Paris, BNP Paribas Chair of Quantitative Finance. 193
A. Torabi, C. Pal, H. Larochelle, and A. Courville. 2015. Using descriptive video services to
create a large data source for video annotation research. arXiv:1503.01070. 26, 27
Bibliography
367
A. Torralba, R. Fergus, and Y. Weiss. June 2008. Small codes and large databases for
recognition. In 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.
1–8. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587633. 120
W. A. A. Torres, N. Bhattacharjee, and B. Srinivasan. 2014. Effectiveness of fully homomorphic encryption to preserve the privacy of biometric data. In Proceedings of the
16th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications
& Services, pp. 152–158. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2684200.2684296. 82
D. Tran, L. D. Bourdev, R. Fergus, L. Torresani, and M. Paluri. 2015. C3D: Generic features
for video analysis. In ICCV, 2(7): 8. 10, 16, 24
J. R. Troncoso-Pastoriza, S. Katzenbeisser, and M. Celik. 2007. Privacy preserving error
resilient DNA searching through oblivious automata. In Proceedings of the 14th
ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 519–528. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/1315245.1315309. 83
B. L. Tseng, C.-Y. Lin, and J. R. Smith. 2004. Using MPEG-7 and MPEG-21 for personalizing
video. MultiMedia, IEEE, 11(1): 42–52. DOI: 10.1109/MMUL.2004.1261105. 157
V. Tudor, M. Almgren, and M. Papatriantafilou. 2015. Harnessing the unknown in advanced
metering infrastructure traffic. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on
Applied Computing, pp. 2204–2211. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2695664.2695725. 103
S. Tulyakov, X. Alameda-Pineda, E. Ricci, L. Yin, J. F. Cohn, and N. Sebe. 2016. Selfadaptive matrix completion for heart rate estimation from face videos under realistic
conditions. In CVPR, pp. 2396–2404. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.263. 58
P. Turaga, R. Chellappa, V. S. Subrahmanian, and O. Udrea. 2008. Machine recognition
of human activities: A survey. IEEE TPAMI, 18(11): 1473–1488. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT
.2008.2005594. 4
T. Tuytelaars and C. Schmid. Oct. 2007. Vector quantizing feature space with a regular
lattice. In ICCV, pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408924. 116
G. Tzanetakis and P. Cook. 2002. Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE
transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5): 293–302. DOI: 10.1109/TSA.2002
.800560. 37
Ubitus. January 2015. Ubitus web page. http://www.ubitus.net. 287
A. Ulges, M. Koch, and D. Borth. 2012. Linking visual concept detection with viewer
demographics. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
Retrieval, p. 24. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2324796.2324827. 147
J. Ullman. 1983. Principles of database systems. W.H. Freeman & Co. New York. 175
UltraVNC. July 2012. UltraVNC web page. http://www.uvnc.com/. 291
M. Upmanyu. 2010. Efficient Privacy Preserving Protocols for Visual Computation. Master’s
thesis, IIIT Hyderabad, India. 82, 93, 96, 102
M. Upmanyu, A. M. Namboodiri, K. Srinathan, and C. V. Jawahar. 2009. Efficient privacy
preserving video surveillance. In Proceedings of IEEE 12th International Conference on
Computer Vision, pp. 1639–1646. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459370. 82, 91, 93, 96
368
Bibliography
R. Valenti, N. Sebe, and T. Gevers. 2009. Image saliency by isocentric curvedness and color.
In ICCV, pp. 2185–2192. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459240. 222
G. Valenzise, L. Gerosa, M. Tagliasacchi, F. Antonacci, and A. Sarti. 2007. Scream and
gunshot detection and localization for audio-surveillance systems. In IEEE Conference
on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, pp. 21–26. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/AVSS
.2007.4425280. 38
H. Van, F. Tran, and J. Menaud. 2009. SLA-aware virtual resource management for cloud
infrastructures. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer and
Information Technology (CIT), pp. 357–362. DOI: 10.1109/CIT.2009.109. 260
L. Vaquero and L. Merino. 2014. Finding your way in the fog: Towards a comprehensive
definition of fog computing. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 44(5):
27–32. DOI: 10.1145/2677046.2677052. 257
A. Vardy and Y. Be’ery. July 1993. Maximum likelihood decoding of the leech lattice. IEEE
Trans. Inform. Theory, 39(4): 1435–1444. DOI: 10.1109/18.243466. 115
A. Vedaldi and A. Zisserman. March 2012. Efficient additive kernels via explicit feature maps.
IEEE Trans. PAMI, 34: 480–492. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2010.5539949. 133
R. Vedantam, C. Lawrence Zitnick, and D. Parikh. 2015. CIDEr: Consensus-based image
description evaluation. In CVPR, pp. 4566–4575. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299087.
27
A. Veen and F. P. Schoenberg. 2008. Estimation of space-time branching process models in
seismology using an EM-type algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association,
103(482): 614–624. DOI: 10.1198/016214508000000148. 200
V. Veeriah, N. Zhuang, and G.-J. Qi. 2015. Differential recurrent neural networks for action
recognition. In ICCV, pp. 4041–4049. 12
S. Venugopalan, M. Rohrbach, J. Donahue, R. Mooney, T. Darrell, and K. Saenko. 2015a.
Sequence to sequence—video to text. In ICCV, pp. 4534–4542. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV
.2015.515. 16, 17, 28
S. Venugopalan, H. Xu, J. Donahue, M. Rohrbach, R. Mooney, and K. Saenko. 2015b.
Translating videos to natural language using deep recurrent neural networks. In
Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association
for Computational Linguistics–Human Language Technologies (NAACL HLT), pp. 1494–
1504. 16, 17, 28
S. Venugopalan, L. A. Hendricks, R. Mooney, and K. Saenko. 2016. Improving LSTM-based
video description with linguistic knowledge mined from text. arXiv:1604.01729.
DOI: 10.18653/v1/D16-1204. 28
T. Verbelen, S. Pieter, T. Filip, and D. Bart. 2012. Cloudlets: Bringing the cloud to the mobile
user. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing and Services (MCS),
pp. 29–36. DOI: 10.1145/2307849.2307858. 259
O. Verscheure, M. Vlachos, A. Anagnostopoulos, P. Frossard, E. Bouillet, and P. S. Yu. 2006.
Finding “who is talking to whom” in VoiP networks via progressive stream clustering.
Bibliography
369
In Proceedings of IEEE Sixth International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 667–677.
DOI: 10.1109/ICDM.2006.72. 97, 98
VideoLAN. VLC media player. Official page for VLC media player, the Open Source video
framework. http://www.videolan.org/vlc/. 293
C. Viedma. 2010. Mobile web mashups. www.mobilemashups.com 171
A. Vinciarelli, A. Dielmann, S. Favre, and H. Salamin. 2009. Canal9: A database of political
debates for analysis of social interactions. In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ICACII), September
2009, pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ACII.2009.5349466. 55
O. Vinyals, A. Toshev, S. Bengio, and D. Erhan. 2015. Show and tell: A neural image caption
generator. In CVPR, pp. 3156–3164. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2587640. 15
P. Viola and M. J. Jones. 2004. Robust real-time face detection. IJCV, 57(2): 137–154.
DOI: 10.1023/B:VISI.0000013087.49260.fb. 225
T. Virtanen, J. F. Gemmeke, B. Raj, and P. Smaragdis. 2015. Compositional models for audio
processing: Uncovering the structure of sound mixtures. Signal Processing Magazine,
IEEE, 32(2): 125–144. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2013.2288990. 42
M. Voit and R. Stiefelhagen. 2010. 3D user-perspective, voxel-based estimation of visual focus
of attention in dynamic meeting scenarios. In ICMI, DOI: 10.1145/1891903.1891966.
57
L. von Ahn and L. Dabbish. 2004. Labeling images with a computer game. In ACM Conference
on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 319–326. DOI: 10.1145/985692.985733.
220
J. Vuurens and A. Vries. 2012. Obtaining high-quality relevance judgments using crowdsourcing. IEEE Transactions on Internet Computing, 16(5): 20–27.
DOI: 10.1109/MIC.2012.71. 262
J. Wache, R. Subramanian, M. K. Abadi, R. L. Vieriu, S. Winkler, and N. Sebe. 2015. Implicit
Personality Profiling Based on Psycho–Physiological Responses to Emotional Videos.
In Int’l Conference on Multimodal Interaction, pp. 239–246. DOI: 10.1145/2818346
.2820736. 221, 237, 238, 239, 241, 245, 247, 249
A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler. 2006. On the implementation of a primal-dual interior point
filter line search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Mathematical
Programming, 106(1): 25–57. DOI: 10.1007/s10107-004-0559-y. 211
K. Walby. 2005. Open-street camera surveillance and governance in Canada. Canadian
Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de
justice pénale, 47(4): 655–684. DOI: 10.3138/cjccj.47.4.655. 91
O. Walter, R. Haeb-Umbach, S. Chaudhuri, and B. Raj. 2013. Unsupervised word discovery
from phonetic input using nested Pitman-Yor language modeling. In Proceedings
of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) Workshop on
Autonomous Learning. 47
370
Bibliography
L. Wan, M. Zeiler, S. Zhang, Y. L. Cun, and R. Fergus. 2013. Regularization of neural networks
using DropConnect. In ICML, 28(3): 1058–1066. 6
C. Wang, K. Ren, W. Lou, and J. Li. 2010. Toward publicly auditable secure cloud data storage
services. IEEE Network, 24(4): 19–24. DOI: 10.1109/MNET.2010.5510914. 260
C. Wang, S. Chow, Q. Wang, K. Ren, and W. Lou. 2013. Privacy-preserving public auditing
for secure cloud storage. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 62(2): 362–375. 260
D. Wang and G. J. Brown (eds.). 2006. Computational Auditory Scene Analysis: Principles,
Algorithms, and Applications, volume 147. Wiley Interscience. 36
H. Wang and C. Schmid. 2013. Action recognition with improved trajectories. In ICCV,
pp. 3551–3558. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.441. 10, 11
J. Wang, S. Kumar, and S.-F. Chang. 2012a. Semi-supervised hashing for large-scale search.
IEEE Trans. PAMI, 34(12): 2393–2406. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.48. 113
J. Wang, H. T. Shen, J. Song, and J. Ji. 2014. Hashing for similarity search: A survey.
arXiv:1408.2927. 120
J. Wang, W. Liu, S. Kumar, and S.-F. Chang. Jan. 2016a. Learning to hash for indexing big
data—A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 104(1): 34–57. DOI: 10.1109/JPROC.2015
.2487976. 120
L. Wang, Y. Qiao, and X. Tang. 2015. Action recognition with trajectory-pooled deepconvolutional descriptors. In CVPR, pp. 4305–4314. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015
.7299059. 11
L. Wang, Y. Xiong, Z. Wang, Y. Qiao, D. Lin, X. Tang, and L. Van Gool. 2016b. Temporal
segment networks: Towards good practices for deep action recognition. In ECCV,
pp. 20–36. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46484-8_2. 11, 24
S. Wang and S. Dey. Nov. 2009. Modeling and characterizing user experience in a cloud
server based mobile gaming approach. In Global Telecommunications Conference,
2009. GLOBECOM 2009. IEEE, pp. 1–7. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03
/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5425784. DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5425784. 220, 309
S. Wang and S. Dey. Apr. 2010a. Addressing response time and video quality in remote
server based internet mobile gaming. 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and
Networking Conference, 5: 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper
.htm?arnumber=5506572. DOI: 10.1109/WCNC.2010.5506572. 309
S. Wang and S. Dey. Dec. 2010b. Rendering adaptation to address communication and
computation constraints in cloud mobile gaming. In Global Telecommunications
Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), IEEE, pp. 1–6. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs
/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=5684144. DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5684144.
309
S. Wang and S. Dey. 2013. Adaptive mobile cloud computing to enable rich mobile multimedia applications. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 15(4): 870–883.
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2013.2240674. 311
Bibliography
371
X. Wang, S. Chen, and S. Jajodia. 2005. Tracking anonymous peer-to-peer VoiP calls on the
internet. In Proceedings of the ACM 12th Conference on Computer and Communications
Security, pp. 81–91. 97, 98
X. Wang, A. Farhadi, and A. Gupta. 2016c. Actions ∼ transformations. In CVPR, pp. 2658–
2667. 11, 24
Y. Wang. 2004. An FSM model for situation-aware mobile application software systems. In
ACM-SE 42: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Southeast Regional Conference, pp. 52–57.
ISBN 1-58113-870-9. DOI: 10.1145/1102120.1102133. 165
Y. Wang and M. S. Kankanhalli. 2015. Tweeting cameras for event detection. In Proceedings
of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 1231–1241. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2736277.2741634. 185
Y. Wang and G. Mori. 2009. Human action recognition by semilatent topic models.
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 31(10): 1762–1774.
DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.43. 187
Y. Wang, C. von der Weth, Y. Zhang, K. H. Low, V. K. Singh, and M. Kankanhalli. 2016d.
Concept based hybrid fusion of multimodal event signals. In 2016 IEEE International
Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), pp. 14–19. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2009.43. 185
Z. Wang, L. Sun, X. Chen, W. Zhu, J. Liu, M. Chen, and S. Yang. 2012b. Propagation-based
social-aware replication for social video contents. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 29–38. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2393347
.2393359. 153
R. Weber and H. Blott. 1997. An approximation based data structure for similarity search.
Technical report, ESPRIT Project HERMES. 109, 110
R. Weber, H.-J. Schek, and S. Blott. 1998. A quantitative analysis and performance study
for similarity-search methods in high-dimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Very Large DataBases, pp. 194–205. 107, 109, 110
WebM. April 2013. The WebM project web page. http://www.webmproject.org. 292
K. Q. Weinberger and L. K. Saul. 2009. Distance metric learning for large margin nearest
neighbor classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10(Feb): 207–244. 149
C. Weinhardt, A. Anandasivam, B. Blau, N. Borissov, T. Meinl, W. Michalk, and J. Stober.
2009. Cloud computing—A classification, business models, and research directions.
Business and Information Systems Engineering, 1(5): 391–399. DOI: 10.1007/s12599009-0071-2. 259
M. Weintraub. 1985. A Theory and Computational Model of Auditory Monoaural Sound
Separation. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University.
37
Y. Weiss, A. Torralba, and R. Fergus. Dec. 2009. Spectral hashing. In NIPS, pp. 1753–1760.
110, 112, 122, 124
J.Wen, M. Severa,W. Zeng, M. Luttrell, and W. Jin. 2001. A format-compliant configurable
encryption framework for access control of multimedia. In 2001 IEEE Fourth Workshop
372
Bibliography
on Multimedia Signal Processing, pp. 435–440. DOI: 10.1109/MMSP.2001.962772. 92,
93
J. Wen, M. Severa, W. Zeng, M. H. Luttrell, and W. Jin. 2002. A format-compliant configurable
encryption framework for access control of video. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems for Video Technology, 12(6): 545–557. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT.2002.800321. 92,
93
P. Wieschollek, O. Wang, and A. Sorkine-Hornung. June 2016. Efficient large-scale
approximate nearest neighbor search on the GPU. In CVPR, pp. 2027–2035.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.223. 111
D. Willis, A. Dasgupta, and S. Banerjee. 2014. ParaDrop: A multi-tenant platform for
dynamically installed third party services on home gateways. In Proceedings
of ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Distributed Cloud Computing (DCC), pp. 43–48.
DOI: 10.1145/2645892.2645901. 259
J. G. Wilpon, L. R. Rabiner, C.-H. Lee, and E. R. Goldman. 1990. Automatic recognition
of keywords in unconstrained speech using hidden Markov models. Proceedings
of IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 38(11): 1870–1878.
DOI: 10.1109/29.103088. 95, 98
K. W. Wilson and B. Raj. 2010. Spectrogram dimensionality reduction with independence
constraints. In ICASSP, pp. 1938–1941. DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2010.5495308. 37
K. W. Wilson, B. Raj, P. Smaragdis, and A. Divakaran. 2008. Speech denoising using nonnegative matrix factorization with priors. In ICASSP, pp. 4029–4032.
DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518538. 36
C. V. Wright, L. Ballard, F. Monrose, and G. M. Masson. 2007. Language identification of
encrypted VoiP traffic: Alejandra y Roberto or Alice and Bob. In Proceedings of the 16th
USENIX Security Symposium, pp. 1–12. 97, 98
C. V. Wright, L. Ballard, S. E. Coull, F. Monrose, and G. M. Masson. 2008. Spot me if you can:
Uncovering spoken phrases in encrypted VoiP conversations. In IEEE Symposium on
Security and Privacy, pp. 35–49. DOI: 10.1109/SP.2008.21. 97, 98
B. Wu, S. Lyu, B.-G. Hu, and Q. Ji. 2015a. Multi-label learning with missing labels for image
annotation and facial action unit recognition. Pattern Recognition, 48(7): 2279–2289.
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.01.022. 58
F. Wu and B. A. Huberman. Nov. 2007. Novelty and collective attention. PNAS ’07, 104(45):
17599–17601. http://www.pnas.org/content/104/45/17599.abstract. DOI: 10.1073
/pnas.0704916104. 210
J. Wu, C. Yuen, N. Cheung, J. Chen, and C. W. Chen. Dec. 2015b. Enabling adaptive highframe-rate video streaming in mobile cloud gaming applications. IEEE Transactions
on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 25(12): 1988–2001. DOI: 10.1109/TCSVT
.2015.2441412. 309
L. Wu, S. Garg, and R. Buyya. 2011. SLA-based resource allocation for Software as a Service
Provider (SaaS) in cloud computing environments. In Proceedings of IEEE/ACM
Bibliography
373
International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing (CCGRID), pp.195–204.
DOI: 10.1109/CCGrid.2011.51. 260
L. Wu, R. Jin, and A. K. Jain. 2013. Tag completion for image retrieval. IEEE TPAMI, 35(3):
716–727. DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.124. 58
Z. Wu. 2014. Gaming in the cloud: One of the future entertainment. In Interactive Multimedia
Conference, pp. 1–6. 290, 291
Z. Wu, X. Wang, Y.-G. Jiang, H. Ye, and X. Xue. 2015c. Modeling spatial-temporal clues
in a hybrid deep learning framework for video classification. In ACM Multimedia,
pp. 461–470. DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806222. 11, 12
Z. Wu, Y.-G. Jiang, X. Wang, H. Ye, and X. Xue. 2016. Multi-stream multi-class fusion
of deep networks for video classification. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 791–800.
DOI: 10.1145/2964284.2964328. 7, 12, 24
x264. July 2012. x264 web page. http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html. 292
L. Xie, A. Natsev, J. R. Kender, M. Hill, and J. R. Smith. 2011. Visual memes in social
media: Tracking real-world news in YouTube videos. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM
International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 53–62. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2072298
.2072307. 156
X. Xie, H. Liu, S. Goumaz, and W.-Y. Ma. 2005. Learning user interest for image browsing on
small-form-factor devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors
in Computing Systems, pp. 671–680. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/1054972.1055065. 148
X. Xiong and F. De La Torre. 2013. Supervised descent method and its applications to face
alignment. In CVPR, pp. 532–539. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.75. 225
Z. Xiong, R. Radhakrishnan, and A. Divakaran. 2003. Generation of sports highlights using
motion activity in combination with a common audio feature extraction framework.
In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Image Processing, volume 1,
pp. I–5. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICIP.2003.1246884. 38
H. Xu, J. Wang, Z. Li, G. Zeng, S. Li, and N. Yu. November 2011. Complementary hashing for
approximate nearest neighbor search. In ICCV, pp. 1631–1638. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV
.2011.6126424. 118
H. Xu, S. Venugopalan, V. Ramanishka, M. Rohrbach, and K. Saenko. 2015a. A multi-scale
multiple instance video description network. arXiv:1505.05914. 28
J. Xu, E.-C. Chang, and J. Zhou. 2013. Weak leakage-resilient client-side deduplication of
encrypted data in cloud storage. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGSAC Symposium
on Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 195–206. ACM.
DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126424. 95
J. Xu, T. Mei, T. Yao, and Y. Rui. 2016. MSR-VTT: A large video description dataset for bridging
video and language. In CVPR, pp. 5288–5296. 15, 16, 27
K. Xu, M. Song, X. Zhang, and J. Song. 2009. A cloud computing platform based on P2P. In
Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on IT in Medicine and Education (ITIME),
pp. 1–4. DOI: 10.1109/ITIME.2009.5236386. 259
374
Bibliography
L. Xu, X. Guo, Y. Lu, S. Li, O. C. Au, and L. Fang. Jul. 2014. A low latency cloud gaming system
using edge preserved image homography. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on
Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2014.6890279. 307
M. Xu, N. Maddage, C. Xu, M. Kankanhalli, and Q. Tian. 2003. Creating audio keywords for
event detection in soccer video. In Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on
Multimedia and Expo, volume 2, pp. II–281. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2003.1221608.
38
R. Xu, C. Xiong, W. Chen, and J. J. Corso. 2015b. Jointly modeling deep video and
compositional text to bridge vision and language in a unified framework. In AAAI,
pp. 2346–2352. 16, 17
Z. Xu, Y. Yang, and A. G. Hauptmann. 2015c. A discriminative CNN video representation for
event detection. In CVPR, pp. 1798–1807. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298789. 9
K. Yadati, H. Katti, and M. Kankanhalli. 2014. CAVVA: Computational affective video-in-video
advertising. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16(1): 15–23. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2013
.2282128. 237
M. A. Yakubu, P. K. Atrey, and N. C. Maddage. 2015. Secure audio reverberation over cloud.
In 10th Annual Symposium on Information Assurance (ASIA ’15), p. 39. 99, 100
Y. Yan, E. Ricci, R. Subramanian, O. Lanz, and N. Sebe. 2013. No matter where you are:
Flexible graph-guided multi-task learning for multi-view head pose classification
under target motion. In IEEE ICCV, pp. 1177–1184. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2013.150. 57,
71
Y. Yan, E. Ricci, R. Subramanian, G. Liu, and N. Sebe. 2014. Multitask linear discriminant
analysis for view invariant action recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
(TIP), 23(12): 5599–5611. DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2014.2365699. 56
J. Yang, K. Yu, Y. Gong, and T. Huang. 2009. Linear spatial pyramid matching using sparse
coding for image classification. In CVPR, 1794–1801. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2009
.5206757. 233, 234, 235
L. Yang and R. Jin. 2006. Distance metric learning: A comprehensive survey. Michigan State
University, 2(2): 78. 149
Q. Yang, M. J. Wooldridge, and H. Zha. 2015. Trailer generation via a point process-based
visual attractiveness model. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, pp. 2198–2204. AAAI Press. ISBN 9781577357384. 193, 200
Y. Yang, P. Cui, W. Zhu, and S. Yang. 2013. User interest and social influence based emotion
prediction for individuals. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on
Multimedia, pp. 785–788. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502204. 148, 150
A. C.-C. Yao. July 1981. Should tables be sorted? Journal of the ACM, 28(3): 615–628.
DOI: 10.1145/322261.322274. 108, 113
L. Yao, A. Torabi, K. Cho, N. Ballas, C. Pal, H. Larochelle, and A. Courville. 2015a. Describing
videos by exploiting temporal structure. In ICCV, pp. 4507–4515. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV
.2015.512. 12, 16, 17, 28
Bibliography
375
T. Yao, C.-W. Ngo, and S. Zhu. 2012. Predicting domain adaptivity: Redo or recycle? In ACM
Multimedia, pp. 821–824. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.512. 17
T. Yao, T. Mei, C.-W. Ngo, and S. Li. 2013. Annotation for free: Video tagging by mining user
search behavior. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 977–986. DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502085.
15
T. Yao, T. Mei, and C.-W. Ngo. 2015b. Learning query and image similarities with ranking
canonical correlation analysis. In ICCV, pp. 28–36. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2015.12. 17
T. Yao, Y. Pan, C.-W. Ngo, H. Li, and T. Mei. 2015c. Semi-supervised domain adaptation
with subspace learning for visual recognition. In CVPR, pp. 2142–2150. DOI: 10.1109
/CVPR.2015.7298826. 17
T. Yao, Y. Pan, Y. Li, Z. Qiu, and T. Mei. 2016. Boosting image captioning with attributes.
arXiv:1611.01646. 17
K. Yatani and K. N. Truong. 2012. Bodyscope: A wearable acoustic sensor for activity
recognition. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing,
pp. 341–350. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2370216.2370269. 52
S. Yau and J. Liu. 2006. Hierarchical situation modeling and reasoning for pervasive
computing. In The Fourth IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future
Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, 2006, and the 2006 Second International Workshop
on Collaborative Computing, Integration, and Assurance, pp. 5–10. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109
/SEUS-WCCIA.2006.25. 165, 167
G. Ye, Y. Li, H. Xu, D. Liu, and S.-F. Chang. 2015a. Eventnet: A large scale structured concept
library for complex event detection in video. In ACM Multimedia, pp. 471–480.
DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806221. 22
H. Ye, Z. Wu, R.-W. Zhao, X. Wang, Y.-G. Jiang, and X. Xue. 2015b. Evaluating two-stream CNN
for video classification. In ACM ICMR, pp. 435–442. DOI: 10.1145/2671188.2749406.
10
S. Yi, Z. Hao, Z. Qin, and Q. Li. 2015. Fog computing: Platform and applications. In
Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in Web Systems and Technologies (HotWeb),
pp. 73–78. DOI: 10.1109/HotWeb.2015.22. 257
R. Yogachandran, R. Phan, J. Chambers, and D. Parish. 2012. Facial expression recognition
in the encrypted domain based on local Fisher discriminant analysis. In Proceedings
of the IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, pp. 83–92. DOI: 10.1109/T-AFFC.2012
.33. 88, 90
H. Yu, J. Wang, Z. Huang, Y. Yang, and W. Xu. 2016. Video paragraph captioning using
hierarchical recurrent neural networks. In CVPR, pp. 4584–4593. 15, 16, 28, 29
Z. Yuan, J. Sang, Y. Liu, and C. Xu. 2013. Latent feature learning in social media network. In
Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 253–262. ACM.
DOI: 10.1145/2502081.2502284. 148
376
Bibliography
M. Yuen, I. King, and K. Leung. 2011. A survey of crowdsourcing systems. In Proceedings
of IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 739–773.
DOI: 10.1109/PASSAT/SocialCom.2011.203. 257
K. Yun, Y. Peng, D. Samaras, G. J. Zelinsky, and T. L. Berg. 2013. Studying relationships
between human gaze, description, and computer vision. In CVPR, pp. 739–746.
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2013.101. 220, 226
G. Zen, B. Lepri, E. Ricci, and O. Lanz. 2010. Space speaks: Towards socially and personality
aware visual surveillance. In ACM International Workshop on Multimodal Pervasive
Video Analysis, pp. 37–42. DOI: 10.1145/1878039.1878048. 238, 240
W. Zeng and S. Lei. 1999. Efficient frequency domain video scrambling for content access
control. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Multimedia
(Part 1), pp. 285–294. DOI: 10.1145/319463.319627. 92, 93
W. Zeng and S. Lei. 2003. Efficient frequency domain selective scrambling of digital video.
IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 5(1): 118–129. DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2003.808817. 92,
93
S. Zha, F. Luisier, W. Andrews, N. Srivastava, and R. Salakhutdinov. 2015. Exploiting imagetrained CNN architectures for unconstrained video classification. In BMVC, 60: 1–13.
DOI: 10.5244/C.29.60. 9, 24
B. Zhang, L. Wang, Z. Wang, Y. Qiao, and H. Wang. 2016. Real-time action recognition with
enhanced motion vector CNNs. In CVPR, pp. 2718–2726. 11
H. Zhang, Z.-J. Zha, S. Yan, J. Bian, and T.-S. Chua. 2012. Attribute feedback. In Proceedings of
the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 79–88. ACM. DOI: 10.1145
/2393347.2393365. 148
T. Zhang and C.-C. J. Kuo. 2001. Audio content analysis for online audiovisual data
segmentation and classification. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing,
9(4): 441–457. DOI: 10.1109/89.917689. 38
T. Zhang, C. Du, and J. Wang. June 2014. Composite quantization for approximate nearest
neighbor search. In ICML, pp. 838–846. DOI: 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126424. 131
T. Zhang, G.-J. Qi, J. Tang, and J. Wang. June 2015a. Sparse composite quantization. In CVPR,
pp. 4548–4556. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299085. 131
Y.-Q. Zhang, W.-L. Zheng, and B.-L. Lu. 2015b. Transfer Components Between Subjects for
EEG-based Driving Fatigue Detection, pp. 61–68. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-31926561-2_8. 250
Z. Zhao, K. Hwang, and J. Villeta. 2012. Game cloud design with virtualized CPU/GPU servers
and initial performance results. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Scientific Cloud
Computing, ScienceCloud ’12, pp. 23–30. ACM, New York. DOI: 10.1145/2287036
.2287042. 301
Y. Zheng, X. Yuan, X. Wang, J. Jiang, C. Wang, and X. Gui. 2015. Enabling encrypted cloud
media center with secure deduplication. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on
Bibliography
377
Information, Computer and Communications Security, pp. 63–72. ACM. DOI: 10.1145
/2714576.2714628. 94, 96
E. Zhong, B. Tan, K. Mo, and Q. Yang. 2013. User demographics prediction based on mobile
data. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, pp. 823–837. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.07.009.
147
M. Zhou, R. Zhang, W. Xie, W. Qian, and A. Zhou. 2010. Security and privacy in cloud
computing: A survey. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Semantics
Knowledge and Grid (SKG), pp. 105–112. DOI: 10.1109/SKG.2010.19. 260
C. Zhu, R. H. Byrd, P. Lu, and J. Nocedal. 1997. Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines
for large-scale bound-constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathematical
Software (TOMS), 23(4): 550–560. DOI: 10.1145/279232.279236. 207
W. Zhu, J. Hu, G. Sun, X. Cao, and Y. Qiao. 2016. A key volume mining deep framework for
action recognition. In CVPR, pp. 1991–1999. DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.219. 12, 24
X. Zhu and A. B. Goldberg. 2009. Introduction to semi-supervised learning. Synthesis Lectures
on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Morgan and Claypool Publishers. 72
X. Zhuang, S. Tsakalidis, S. Wu, P. Natarajan, R. Prasad, and P. Natarajan. 2011. Compact
audio representation for event detection in consumer media. In Proceedings of
Interspeech, pp. 2089–2092. 46
J. R. Zipkin, F. P. Schoenberg, K. Coronges, and A. L. Bertozzi. 2016. Point-process
models of social network interactions: Parameter estimation and missing data
recovery. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 27: 502–529. DOI: 10.1017
/S0956792515000492. 209
Index
1-bit compressive sensing for sketch
similarity, 121
1 Million Song Corpus for audition, 37–38
3D CNN model, 9–10
3DMark Ice Storm Benchmark, 305–306
Abstraction in situations, 166, 168
Accelerometers in multimodal analysis of
social interactions, 55–56
Acoustic backgrounds, 41
Acoustic events, 41
Acoustic intelligence, 32–33
Action Control in EventShop platform, 179
Actionable situations, 168
Actions of audition objects, 47
ActivityNet dataset for video classification,
22
ActivityNet Large Scale Activity Recognition
Challenge, 23
Actuators in eco-systems, 162
AdaPtive HFR vIdeo Streaming (APHIS) for
cloud gaming, 309–310
Additive and multiplicative homomorphism, 88–90
Additive quantization in similarity searches,
131
ADMM (alternating-direction method of
multipliers), 63–66
Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) for cloud
gaming, 289
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard), 98
Affective ratings in emotion and personality
type recognition, 240, 243–247
Aggregation in situation recognition, 175–
176
Agreeableness personality dimension, 237
Alerts in EventShop platform, 182
AlexNet, 5, 9
Algebraic homomorphic property in
encrypted content, 101
All-in-one software pack for GamingAnywhere, 294–295
Alternating-direction method of multipliers
(ADMM), 63–66
AMD (Advanced Micro Devices) for cloud
gaming, 289
amtCNN (asymmetric multi-task CNN)
model, 149
Animation rendering
crowdsourced, 273–275
resource requirements, 256
ANN (approximate nearest neighbors)
strategies, 105, 107–111
Annotations
eye fixations as, 226–236
user cues, 220
Anti-sparse coding for sketch similarity,
126–127
APHIS (AdaPtive HFR vIdeo Streaming) for
cloud gaming, 309–310
Applications for audition, 49
Approximate nearest neighbors (ANN)
strategies, 105, 107–111
Approximate search algorithms, 107–108
Architecture for video captioning, 17–18
Arousal dimensions in emotion and
380
Index
personality type recognition, 236–
237, 243–247
Arrival times in Poisson processes, 195
Asthma/allergy risk recommendations, 163,
183–184
Asymmetric multi-task CNN (amtCNN)
model, 149
Asymmetric sketch similarity schemes,
123
Attention mechanism for LSTM, 13
Audio
emotion recognition, 221
multimodal analysis of social interactions, 55–56
multimodal pose estimation, 60
segment grouping, 43–44
Audio processing in encrypted domain
audio editing quality enhancement,
99–100
speech/speaker recognition, 95–99
Audition for multimedia computing
applications, 49
background, 35–39
Computer Audition field, 32–35
conclusion, 49–50
data for, 39–40
generative models of sound, 45
generative structure of audio, 44–45
grouping audio segments, 43–44
nature of audio data, 40–41
NELS, 47–48
overview, 31–32
peculiarities of sound, 41–49
representation and parsing of mixtures,
42–43
structure discovery in audio, 46–47
weak and opportunistic supervision,
48–49
Augmented Lagrangian in ADMM, 64
Augmented-reality cloud gaming, 313
Average query time for similarity searches,
111
B-trees in similarity searches, 107
Bag-of-words representation
object recognition, 232–233
similarity searches, 116
Basic linear algebra subprograms (BLAS)
for similarity searches, 111
Behavior analysis in user-multimedia
interaction, 146
Benchmarks in deep learning, 19–29
Best-bin-first strategy in similarity searches,
107
BGN (Boneh-Goh-Nissim) cryptosystem, 99
BGV (Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan)
scheme, 101
Big-five marker scale (BFMS) questionnaire
for emotion and personality type
recognition, 238
Big-five model for emotion recognition, 237
Binary regularization term in multimodal
pose estimation, 62
Biometric data, SPED for, 82–83
Biometric recognition for image processing,
88
BLAS (basic linear algebra subprograms) for
similarity searches, 111
BLEU@N metric for video classification,
27–29
Blind source separation (BSS) in audition,
36
BOINC platform, 258
Boneh-Goh-Nissim (BGN) cryptosystem, 99
Bottlenecks in Hawkes processes, 208–209
Bounding box annotations in scene
recognition, 228–229
Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan (BGV)
scheme, 101
Branching structure in Hawkes processes,
200–202, 213
Broadcasts in situation-aware applications,
164
BSS (blind source separation) in audition,
36
Building blocks in situation recognition,
171
Business models in fog computing, 261
Index
C-ADMM (coupled alternating direction
method of multipliers), 64–66
Caller/callee pairs of streams in speech/
speaker recognition, 97
Captioning video, 14–19, 23–29
Capture servers for GamingAnywhere, 296
CASA (computational auditory scene
analysis), 36–37
Cascade size in Hawkes processes, 213–215
CBIR (content-based information retrieval),
85
CCV (Columbia Consumer Videos) dataset,
21
CDC (cloud data center) architecture, 80
Cell-probe model and algorithms for
similarity searches
description, 108
hash functions, 113–118
introduction, 113–114
query mechanisms, 118–120
CF (collaborative filtering)
recommender systems, 151–152
SPED for, 82
CG (computationally grounded) factor
definitions for situations, 167
Characterization in situation recognition,
175–176
Chi-Square in similarity searches, 133
CHIL Acoustic Event Detection campaign,
38
Children events in Hawkes processes,
212–213
Chroma features in audition, 37–38
CIDEr metric for video classification, 27–29
Classification
audition, 38
situation recognition, 175–176
Client-server privacy-preserving image
retrieval framework, 86
Cloud computing. See Fog computing
Cloud data center (CDC) architecture, 80
Cloud gaming, 256
adaptive transmission, 308–310
cloud deployment, 298–302
381
communication, 307–310
conclusion, 314
future paradigm, 310–314
GamingAnywhere, 291–298
hardware decoders, 306
interaction delay, 302–304
introduction, 287–289
multiplayer games, 310–311
research, 289–291
thin client design, 302–306
Cloudlet servers, 259
Clusters of offspring in Hawkes processes,
201–202
CNNs (convolutional neural networks)
end-to-end architectures, 9–12
similarity searches, 107
video, 5–6
Collaborative filtering (CF)
recommender systems, 151–152
SPED for, 82
Color SIFT (CSIFT) features in object
recognition, 234–236
Columbia Consumer Videos (CCV) dataset,
21
Column-wise regularization in C-ADMM, 64
Common architecture for video captioning,
17–18
Common principles of interactions between
users and multimedia data, 155
Communications
cloud gaming, 307–310
fog computing, 257
Complementary hash functions, 117–118
Complex mathematical operations in
encrypted multimedia analysis,
102–103
Complexity
encrypted multimedia content, 101
similarity searches, 109–111
Compositional models of sound, 42–43
Compressed-domain distance estimation
in similarity searches, 127–128
Compressed speaker recognition (CSR)
systems, 97
382
Index
Compression in cloud gaming, 307–308
Computational auditory scene analysis
(CASA), 36–37
Computational bottlenecks in Hawkes
processes, 208–209
Computational complexity in encrypted
multimedia content, 101
Computational/conditional security in
encrypted multimedia content, 103
Computational cost in similarity searches,
109
Computationally grounded (CG) factor
definitions for situations, 167
Computations in fog computing, 257
Computer Audition. See Audition for
multimedia computing
Conditional random field (CRF) in video
captioning, 17–18
Confidentiality of data, SPED for, 83–84
Connectivity for cloud gaming, 311
Conscientiousness personality dimension,
237, 246
Containers in fog computing, 261, 282–284
Content-based information retrieval (CBIR),
85
Content-centric computing, 138, 143
Content delay in CrowdMAC framework,
266–267
“Content Is Dead; Long Live Content!”
panel, 142
Content quality in Hawkes processes, 210
Context-aware cloud gaming, 313–314
Controlled minions in fog computing, 257
Conversion operator in EventShop platform,
182
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs)
end-to-end architectures, 9–12
similarity searches, 107
video, 5–6
Cooperative component sharing in cloud
gaming, 312
Correctness in fog computing, 262
Cosine similarity and indexing
similarity searches, 133
sketch similarity, 121–124
Cost
CrowdMAC framework, 266–267
crowdsourced animation, 273
“Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda: 20 Years of
Multimedia Opportunities” panel,
142
Counter-Strike game, 302
Coupled alternating direction method of
multipliers (C-ADMM), 64–66
CRF (conditional random field) in video
captioning, 17–18
Crowdedness monitors in fog computing,
284
CrowdMAC framework, 263–267
Crowdsensing in SAIS, 268
Crowdsourced animation rendering
services, 273–275
Cryptology. See Encrypted domain
multimedia content analysis
CSIFT features in object recognition,
234–236
CSR (compressed speaker recognition)
systems, 97
CubeLendar system, 188
D-CASE (Detection and Classification
of Acoustic Scenes and Events)
challenge, 38
DAGs (direct acyclic graphs) in fog
computing, 276–278
Data Box project, 188
Data-centric computing, 137–138, 143
Data collection of social media, 144–145
Data compression in cloud gaming, 307–
308
Data ingestion
EventShop platform, 179, 181
situation recognition, 173
Data overhead in encrypted domain
multimedia content analysis, 101
Data representation and analysis
multimedia analysis, 154
situation recognition, 174, 185–186
Index
Data-source Panel in EventShop platform,
178
Data unification in situation recognition,
173
Datasets in video classification, 19–23
DBNs (deep belief networks) in convolutional neural networks, 5
DCT sign correlation for images, 88
dE-mages, 185
Decoders in cloud gaming, 306
Decomposition in Hawkes processes,
204–205
Deep belief networks (DBNs) in convolutional neural networks, 5
Deep learning
benchmarks and challenges, 19–29
conclusion, 29
introduction, 3–4
modules, 4–8
video captioning, 14–19
video classification, 8–14, 19–23
Delay bounded admission control
algorithm, 266
Delays
cloud gaming, 302–304
CrowdMAC framework, 266–267
Demographic information inference from
user-generated content, 147
Descriptors in situation definitions,
167
Detection and Classification of Acoustic
Scenes and Events (D-CASE)
challenge, 38
Device-aware scalable applications for cloud
gaming, 291
Difference-of-Gaussian (DoG) transforms in
SIFT, 86–87
Digital watermarking, SPED for, 81
Direct acyclic graphs (DAGs) in fog
computing, 276–278
Direct memory access (DMA) channels for
cloud gaming, 300
Discrete Fourier transformation for
probabilistic cryptosystems, 80
383
Distance embeddings in similarity searches,
133
Distance metric learning, intentionoriented, 149–150
Distributed principal component analysis,
275–280
DMA (direct memory access) channels for
cloud gaming, 300
Docker containers for fog computing,
283–284
DoG (Difference-of-Gaussian) transforms in
SIFT, 86–87
Dropout in AlexNet, 5
E-mages
EventShop platform, 178–181
situation recognition, 173
E2LSH techniques in similarity searches,
131
ECGs (electrocardiograms) in emotion and
personality type recognition, 238,
241–242
Eco-systems for situation recognition,
162–164
Edge effects in Hawkes processes, 208
EEG (electroencephalogram) devices
emotion and personality type recognition, 238, 241–242
user cues, 220–221
Efficiency
encrypted domain multimedia content
analysis, 103
situation recognition, 174
SPED for, 84
Efficient Task Assignment (ETA) algorithm
in SAIS, 269–272
EigenBehaviors in situation recognition,
187
Electrocardiograms (ECGs) in emotion and
personality type recognition, 238,
241–242
Electroencephalogram (EEG) devices
emotion and personality type recognition, 238, 241–242
384
Index
Electroencephalogram (EEG) devices
(continued)
user cues, 220–221
Electronic voting, SPED for, 81
ElGamal cryptosystem, 79
Emerging applications in encrypted domain
multimedia content analysis, 102–
103
Emotion and personality type recognition
introduction, 236–238
materials and methods, 238–240
personality scores vs. affective ratings,
243–247
physiological feature extraction, 240–243
physiological signals, 247–250
user cues, 221
Encoder-decoder LSTM, 14
Encoding strategies in sketch similarity,
125–126
Encrypted domain multimedia content
analysis
audio processing, 95–100
conclusion, 104
future research and challenges, 101–104
image processing, 84–90
introduction, 75–78
SPED, 78–84
video processing in encrypted domain,
91–96
End-to-end CNN architectures in imagebased video classification, 9–12
Energy usage in CrowdMAC framework,
266, 272
Enhancement layer in cloud gaming, 308
Environmental sound classification in
audition, 38
Epidemic type aftershock-sequences (ETAS)
model, 209
Equivalent counting point processes, 194
ESP game, 220
ETA (Efficient Task Assignment) algorithm
in SAIS, 269–272
ETAS (epidemic type aftershock-sequences)
model, 209
Ethical issues in situation recognition, 188
Euclidean case in similarity searches,
106–107, 114–115
Evaluation criteria for similarity searches,
109–113
Event-driven servers for GamingAnywhere,
296
EventNet dataset for video classification, 22
Events, point processes for. See Point
processes for events
EventShop platform
asthma/allergy risk recommendation,
183–184
heterogeneous data, 180–182
operators, 181–182
overview, 177–178
situation-aware applications, 182–185
system design, 178–180
Exact search algorithms, 107–108
Exhaustive search algorithms, 107–108
Exogenous events in Hawkes processes, 198
Expectation in similarity searches, 128
Expected number of future events in Hawkes
processes, 212–213
Expected value in Poisson processes, 194
Exploding gradients in recurrent neural
networks, 7
Expressive power concept in situation
recognition, 170
Extraversion personality dimension, 237,
244
Eye fixations and movements in object
recognition
discussion, 232
emotion recognition, 237
fixation-based annotations, 232–236
free-viewing and visual search, 227–232
introduction, 226–227
materials and methods, 227
scene semantics inferences from, 222–
226
user cues, 220
Eysenck’s personality model, 237
F-formation detection in head and body
pose estimation, 69–73
Index
Face detectors in fog computing, 283–284
Face swapping in video surveillance
systems, 92
Facial expressions, differentiating via eye
movements in, 224–226
Facial landmark trajectories in emotion
and personality type recognition,
242–243
Fairness in cloud gaming, 311
FCGs. See Free-standing conversational
groups (FCGs)
FCVID (Fudan-Columbia Video Dataset)
dataset for video classification, 22
Feature extraction in image processing,
86–88
Feed-forward neural networks (FFNNs),
6
Filtering
probabilistic cryptosystems, 80
recommender systems, 151–152
situation recognition, 175
SPED for, 82
Fisher Vector encoding with Variational
AutoEncoder (FV-VAE), 9
Five-factor model for emotion recognition,
237
Fixed-base annotations for object
recognition, 232–236
Flickr videos
in audition, 39
user favorite behavior patterns, 148
Fog computing
challenges, 260–262
conclusion, 285–286
CrowdMAC framework, 263–267
crowdsourced animation rendering
service, 273–275
introduction, 255–258
open-source platforms, 280–285
related work, 258–260
scalable and distributed principal
component analysis, 275–280
Smartphone-Augmented Infrastructure
Sensing, 268–272
Fraud in fog computing, 262
385
Frechet distances in similarity searches,
133
Free-standing conversational groups
(FCGs), 51
conclusion, 73–74
F-formation detection, 69–73
head and body pose estimation, 56–57,
66–69
introduction, 52–55
matrix completion for multimodal pose
estimation, 59–66
matrix completion overview, 57–58
multimodal analysis of social interactions, 55–56
SALSA dataset, 58–59
Free-viewing (FV) tasks
eye movements, 227–232
scene recognition, 226
Freelance minions in fog computing, 257
Fudan-Columbia Video Dataset (FCVID)
dataset for video classification, 22
Fully homomorphic encryption (FHE)
techniques, 88–90
Function hiding, SPED for, 81
Future actions (FA) in situation definitions,
166
Future events in Hawkes processes, 212–213
FV-VAE (Fisher Vector encoding with
Variational AutoEncoder), 9
G-cluster cloud gaming company, 290
Galvanic skin response (GSR) in emotion
and personality type recognition,
238, 241–242
Games as a Service (GaaS), 291
GamingAnywhere
community participation, 297–298
environment setup, 294–295
execution, 296–297
introduction, 291–292
research, 297
system architecture, 293–294
target users, 292–293
Gaussian distribution in situation
recognition, 185
386
Index
Gaussian mixture model (GMM)
CSR systems, 97–99
speech recognition, 36
Generative models
Hawkes processes, 213–215
sound, 45
Generative structure of audio, 44–45
Geolocation in audition, 39
GIST descriptors in similarity searches, 132
GMM (Gaussian mixture model)
CSR systems, 97–99
speech recognition, 36
Goal based (GB) factor in situation
definitions, 166
Google search engine, 151
GoogLeNet, 6, 9
GPUs (graphical processing units) for cloud
gaming, 298–302
Gradients in recurrent neural networks, 7
Graph-based approaches for similarity
searches, 132–134
Graph-cut approach in F-formation
detection, 69–70
Graphical processing units (GPUs) for cloud
gaming, 298–302
Graphics compression in cloud gaming,
307–308
Graphs in social graph modeling, 145
Grouping audio segments, 43–44
GSR (galvanic skin response) in emotion
and personality type recognition,
238, 241–242
Hamming space and embedding
similarity searches, 114–115, 132
sketch similarity, 121–122
Hardware decoders in cloud gaming, 306
Hash functions
similarity searches, 113–118
sketch similarity, 123–124
Hawkes processes, 197
branching structure, 200–202
conclusion, 217–218
estimating, 211–212
expected number of future events,
212–213
generative model, 213–215
hands-on tutorial, 215–217
Hawkes model for social media, 209–217
information diffusion, 210–211
intensity function, 198–200
introduction, 192–193
likelihood function, 205–206
maximum likelihood estimation, 207–
209, 211–212
parameter estimates, 205–209
sampling by decomposition, 204–
205
self-exciting processes, 197–198
simulating events, 202–205
thinning algorithm, 202–204
Head and body pose estimates (HBPE)
experiments, 66–69
F-formation detection, 69–73
free-standing conversational groups,
53–54
overview, 56–57
SALSA dataset, 59
Heart rate in emotion and personality type
recognition, 238, 241–243
Heterogeneous data
EventShop platform, 180–182
user-multimedia interaction, 146
Hidden Markov models (HMM) in speech/
speaker recognition, 95–98
Hierarchical structure in audition, 46–47
High-intensity facial expressions in eye
movements, 224–226
High-rate quantization theory in similarity
searches, 117
Histogram of oriented gradient (HOG)
descriptors, 59
HMDB51 dataset for video classification,
21, 24
HMM (Hidden Markov models) in speech/
speaker recognition, 95–98
HOG (Histogram of oriented gradient)
descriptors, 59
Index
Hollywood Human Action dataset for video
classification, 21
Homomorphic encryption
image search and retrieval, 86
SPED, 79
speech/speaker recognition, 99
video processing in encrypted domain,
94
Homophily hypothesis, 154
Honest-but-curious model, 80–81
Hotspots in mobile Internet, 264–268
Hough voting method (HVFF-lin), 69–70
Hough voting method multi-scale extension
(HVFF-ms), 69–70
Householder decomposition in sketch
similarity, 124
Human actuators in eco-systems, 162
Human behavior in situation recognition,
187
Human-centric computing, 138
Human pose in free-standing conversational groups, 53
Human sensors in eco-systems, 162
HVFF-lin (Hough voting method), 69–70
HVFF-ms (Hough voting method multi-scale
extension), 69–70
Hybrid approaches to similarity searches,
131–132
Hybrid compression in cloud gaming,
307–308
Hyper-diamond E8 lattices in similarity
searches, 115
Hypervisors for cloud gaming, 299
IARPA Aladdin Please program, 38
Image-based video classification, 9
Image collectors in fog computing, 283–284
Image processing in encrypted domain
biometric recognition, 88
feature extraction, 86–88
image search and retrieval, 84–86
quality enhancement, 88–90
Image representation learning, intentionoriented, 148–149
387
ImageNet, 9
Imbalance factor (IF) in similarity searches,
116–117
Immigrant events in Hawkes processes,
198, 200, 204, 210
Impact sounds, 45
In-situ sensing in SAIS, 270–271
Independent sample-wise processing in
SPED, 79–80
Indexing schemes
image search and retrieval, 85
similarity searches, 107–109, 112, 133
Inferring scene semantics from eye
movements, 222–226
Influence-based recommendation, 152
Information diffusion in Hawkes processes,
210–211
Information theoretic/unconditional
security in encrypted multimedia
content, 103
Infrared detection in multimodal pose
estimation, 60
Infrastructure sensing in fog computing,
268–272
Input/output memory management units
(IOMMUs) for cloud gaming, 300
Instance-level inferences in audition, 33
Integrity of data
encrypted domain multimedia content
analysis, 103–104
SPED for, 83
Intensity
Hawkes processes, 198–200, 210
Poisson processes, 195
Intention-oriented learning
distance metric, 149–150
image representation, 148–149
Inter-arrival times in Poisson processes,
194–196
Interaction delay in cloud gaming, 302–304
Interactions of objects in audition, 47
Interactive scenes, saccades in, 223
Intermediate Query Panel in EventShop
platform, 178
388
Index
Internal Storage in EventShop platform, 179
Interoperable common principles in social
media, 155
Interpolation operator in EventShop
platform, 182
Intuitive query and mental model in
situation recognition, 174
Inverse transform sampling technique for
Hawkes processes, 202–203
IOMMUs (input/output memory management units) for cloud gaming,
300
Job assignment algorithms in SAIS, 269
Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, 107
Joint estimation in multimodal pose
estimation, 62
JPEG 2000 images in encrypted domains, 88
K-means in similarity searches, 117, 127–
129
k-NN graphs for similarity searches, 109
KD-trees in similarity searches, 107, 116–
117
Kernel function in Hawkes processes,
198–200, 204–205
Kernel PAC (KPCA) in similarity searches,
133
Kernelized LSH (KLSH) in similarity
searches, 133
Keyword recognizers (KWR) in speech/
speaker recognition, 95–97
Keyword searches for images, 85
Kgraph method for similarity searches, 133
KLSH (kernelized LSH) in similarity
searches, 133
Kodak Consumer Videos dataset for video
classification, 20–21
KPCA (kernel PAC) in similarity searches,
133
Kronecker product in multimodal pose
estimation, 62
KTH dataset for video classification, 20
Kubernetes platform
cloud applications, 256
fog computing, 281–283
Kusanagi project, 290
KVM technology in fog computing, 282
KWR (keyword recognizers) in speech/
speaker recognition, 95–97
LabelMe database, 220
Lagrangian in ADMM, 64
Laplacian matrix in multimodal pose
estimation, 62
Large margin nearest neighbor (LMNN),
149–150
Last-mile technology, 142
Latent variable analysis (LVA) approach in
audition, 37
Lattices in similarity searches, 115
Learned quantizers in similarity searches,
115–116
Leech lattices in similarity searches, 115
Legal issues in cloud gaming, 291
LeNet-5 framework, 5
Likelihood function in Hawkes processes,
205–206
Limb tracking with visual-inertial sensors,
57
Linear filtering in probabilistic cryptosystems, 80
Local maxima in Hawkes processes, 207–
208
Local minima in Hawkes processes, 212
Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH)
hash functions, 114–115
query-adaptive, 119–120
similarity searches, 105–106
sketch similarity, 122, 126–127
Long short-term memory (LSTM)
modeling, 12–13
recurrent neural networks, 7–8
video classification, 17–19
Long-term temporal dynamics modeling,
12–13
Look-up operations in similarity searches,
110
Low-intensity facial expressions in eye
movements, 224–226
Index
Lower the floor concept in situation
recognition, 171
LSH. See Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH)
LSTM (long short-term memory)
modeling, 12–13
recurrent neural networks, 7–8
video classification, 17–19
LXC containers for fog computing, 282
M-VAD (Montreal Video Annotation Dataset)
for video classification, 26
Macroscopic behavior analysis, 146
Magnetoencephalogram (MEG) signals in
emotion recognition, 221
Magnitude of influence in Hawkes
processes, 210
Mahout-PCA library for fog computing,
279–280
Malicious model in SPED, 81
MapReduce platform, 279–280
Marked Hawkes processes, 210–211
Marked memory kernel in Hawkes
processes, 211
Markov process in Hawkes processes,
204–205
Massively multiplayer online role-playing
games (MMORPGs), 310
Matching biometric data, SPED for, 82–83
Matrix completion (MC)
free-standing conversational groups, 54
head and body pose estimation, 57–58
multimodal pose estimation, 59–66
Matrix completion for head and body pose
estimation (MC-HBPE), 60–61,
66–69
Maximum likelihood estimation in Hawkes
processes, 207–209, 211–212
McCulloch-Pitts model for convolutional
neural networks, 5
MCG-WEBV dataset for video classification,
21
MDA (Module Deployment Algorithm), 282,
284
Mean average precision in similarity
searches, 112
389
MediaEval dataset for audition, 39
Medical data, SPED for, 83
MEG (magnetoencephalogram) signals in
emotion recognition, 221
Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients
(MFCCs) in audition, 37
Memory over time in Hawkes processes, 210
Memory reads in similarity searches,
110–111
Memorylessness property in Poisson
processes, 195–196
Mesoscopic behavior analysis, 146
Meta inferences in audition, 33
METEOR metric for video classification,
27–29
MFCCs (Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients) in audition, 37
Microscopic behavior analysis, 146
Microsoft Research Video Description
Corpus (MSVD) dataset for video
classification, 24–28
Minions in fog computing, 257–258
MIREX evaluations in audition, 37
Missing and uncertain data in situation
recognition, 185–186
Mixtures in audition, 42–43
MMORPGs (massively multiplayer online
role-playing games), 310
Mobile Internet, CrowdMAC framework for,
263–267
Mobile offloading in fog computing, 258–
259
Modeling approach in situation recognition,
171–172
Module Deployment Algorithm (MDA), 282,
284
Montreal Video Annotation Dataset (M-VAD)
for video classification, 26
MPEG-X standard, 156–157
MPII Human Pose dataset for video
classification, 22
MPII Movie Description Corpus (MPII-MD)
for video classification, 26
MSR Video to Text (MSR-VTT-10K) dataset
for video classification, 26–27
390
Index
MSVD (Microsoft Research Video
Description Corpus) dataset for
video classification, 24–28
Multi-probe LSH
similarity searches, 118–119
sketch similarity, 122
Multi-task learning approach in head and
body pose estimation, 57
Multimedia Commons initiative for
audition, 39
Multimedia data
social attributes for, 154–155
user interest modeling from, 147–148
Multimedia fog platforms, 257–258
Multimedia-sensed social computing, 156
Multimodal analysis
encrypted domain multimedia content
analysis, 102
free-standing conversational groups.
See Free-standing conversational
groups (FCGs)
sentiment, 150
social interactions, 55–56
Multimodal pose estimation
matrix completion, 59–66
model, 60–63
optimization method, 63–66
Multiplayer games, 310–311
Music signals in audition, 37–38
Natural audio, 33–34
Near neighbors in similarity searches, 114
Need gap vs. semantic gap, 139–141
Neighbors in similarity searches, 106–111,
114
NELL (Never Ending Language Learner)
system, 48
NELS (Never-Ending Sound Learner)
proposal, 47–48
Neuroticism personality dimension, 237,
244–245
NN-descent algorithm for similarity
searches, 133
Non-Euclidean metrics for similarity
searches, 132–134
Non-homogeneous Poisson process, 195–
197
Non-interactive scenes, saccades in, 223
Normalized deviation in crowdsourced
animation rendering service, 274–
275
NP-hard problem in multimodal pose
estimation, 61
Object interactions with saccades, 222–224
Object recognition with eye fixations as
implicit annotations, 226–236
Observed situations, 168
Observers in GamingAnywhere, 293
Offspring events in Hawkes processes,
200–201
Olympic Sports dataset for video
classification, 21
OnLive gaming, 290
Open-source platforms
cloud gaming systems, 292
fog computing, 280–285
OpenCV package in EventShop platform,
179
Openness personality dimension, 237, 246
OpenPDS project, 188
OpenStack platform
cloud applications, 256
fog computing, 281
Operators Panel in EventShop platform, 178
Opportunistic supervision in audition,
48–49
Optimization techniques
cloud gaming, 288
hash functions, 117–118
multimodal pose estimation, 63–66
OTT service for cloud gaming, 310
P2P (peer-to-peer) paradigm
CrowdMAC framework, 265
fog computing, 259
Paillier cryptosystem
homomorphic encryption, 79
SIFT, 86–87
speech/speaker recognition, 99
Index
ParaDrop for fog computing, 259
Parsing of mixtures in audition, 42–43
Pascal animal classes Eye Tracking (PET)
database, 226–228
PASCAL Visual Object Classes for user cues,
220
Pass-through GPUs for cloud gaming, 300
Pattern matching in situation recognition,
175–176
PCA (principal component analysis), 275–
280
peer-to-peer (P2P) paradigm
CrowdMAC framework, 265
fog computing, 259
Percepts in audition, 43
Personality scores in emotion and
personality type recognition
vs. affective ratings, 243–247
description, 240
Personality trait recognition, 247–248
Personalization in EventShop platform, 182
Personalized alerts in situation-aware
applications, 164
Persuading user action, 187–188
PET (Pascal animal classes Eye Tracking)
database, 226–228
Physiological signals in emotion and
personality type recognition
experiments, 249–250
feature extraction, 240–243
materials and methods, 238–240
overview, 236–238
personality scores vs. affective ratings,
243–247
responses, 238–239
trait recognition, 247–249
Play-as-you-go services in cloud gaming, 298
Point processes for events
conclusion, 217–218
defining, 193–194
Hawkes processes. See Hawkes processes
introduction, 191–193
Poisson processes, 193–197
Poisson processes
definition, 194–195
391
memorylessness property, 195–
196
non-homogeneous, 196–197
points, 193–194
POSIX platforms for GamingAnywhere,
295–296
Power consumption in cloud gaming,
305–306
Power-law kernel function for Hawkes
processes, 215–216
Pre-binarized version vectors in sketch
similarity, 126
Principal component analysis (PCA), 275–
280
Privacy
encryption for. See Encrypted domain
multimedia content analysis
fog computing, 262
situation recognition, 174, 188
Probabilistic cryptosystems, 80
Probability density function in Poisson
processes, 195
Product quantization in similarity searches,
128–131
Project+take sign approach for sketch
similarity, 124–127
Protocols in emotion and personality type
recognition, 240
Proximity sensors in multimodal analysis of
social interactions, 55–56
Public video surveillance systems, 91
Quality enhancement in image processing
in encrypted domain, 88–90
Quality of Experience (QoE) metrics in cloud
gaming, 288
Quality of Service (QoS)
cloud gaming, 288
fog computing, 262
Quantization in similarity searches, 106,
127–131
Quantization-optimized LSH in sketch
similarity, 126–127
Quantizers in similarity searches, 115–116,
128–129
392
Index
Queries in similarity searches
mechanisms, 118–120
preparation cost, 110
query-adaptive LSH, 119–120
times, 109, 111
Query plan trees in EventShop platform,
180
Query Processing Engine in EventShop
platform, 179–180
R-trees in similarity searches, 107
Raise the ceiling concept in situation
recognition, 171
Rank-ordered image searches, 85
Rapid prototyping toolkit in situation
recognition, 172
Raspberry Pis for fog computing, 283–284
Raw vectors in similarity searches, 112
Real time strategy (RTS) games, 303
Real time streaming protocol (RTSP),
293–294
Real time transport protocol (RTP), 293–294
Recognition problem in situation
definitions, 168
Recommendation in social-sensed
multimedia, 151–152
Rectified Linear Units (ReLUs) in AlexNet, 5
Recurrence Quantification Analysis (RQA)
in scene recognition, 229–230
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs), 6–8
Redundant computation in fog computing,
278
Region-of-interest rectangles, 225
Registered Queries in EventShop platform,
178
Reliable data collection of social media,
144–145
ReLUs (Rectified Linear Units) in AlexNet, 5
RenderStorm cloud rendering platform, 273
Representation and parsing of mixtures in
audition, 42–43
Request delays in CrowdMAC framework,
266–267
Residual vectors in similarity searches, 129
ResNet, 6
Resource management in fog computing,
261–262
Results Panel in EventShop platform, 178
Revenue in CrowdMAC framework, 266–267
RNNs (recurrent neural networks), 6–8
Round trip time (RTT) jitter in cloud
gaming, 308
Rowe, Larry, 142
Rowley eye detectors, 225
RQA (Recurrence Quantification Analysis)
in scene recognition, 229–230
RSA cryptosystem, 79
RSA-OPRF protocol, 95
RTP (real time transport protocol), 293–294,
303
RTSP (real time streaming protocol), 293–
294
SaaS (Software as a Service) for cloud
gaming, 290
Saccades
object interactions, 222–224
scene recognition, 229
SAIS (Smartphone-Augmented Infrastructure Sensing), 268–272
SALSA (Synergistic sociAL Scene Analysis)
dataset
free-standing conversational groups,
58–59
head and body pose estimation, 66–69
SaltStack platform
cloud applications, 256
fog computing, 281–282
Sampling by decomposition in Hawkes
processes, 204–205
Scalable and distributed principal
component analysis, 275–280
Scalable solutions, SPED for, 84
Scalable video coded (SVC) videos, 94–95
Scale invariant feature transform (SIFT)
fog computing, 275–276
image processing in encrypted domain,
86–87
object recognition with fixation-based
annotations, 234–236
Index
similarity searches, 107, 132
Scene understanding
from eye movements, 222–226
user cues, 220
Searches
images, 84–86
similarity. See Similarity searches
SPED, 82
speech/speaker recognition, 97
visual, 226–232
Secure domains for video encoding, 92–93
Secure processing of medical data, SPED
for, 83
Secure real time transport protocol (SRTP),
98
Security
vs. accuracy, 102–103
encryption. See Encrypted domain
multimedia content analysis
fog computing, 262
Selectivity in similarity searches, 110, 112
Self-exciting processes
Hawkes processes, 197–198
point processes, 192
Semantic gap
bridging, 145
vs. need gap, 139–141
Semantic inferences in audition, 33
Semi-controlled minions in fog computing,
257
Semi-honest model for SPED, 80–81
Semi-supervised hierarchical structure in
audition, 46
Sensors
eco-systems, 162
fog computing, 257
Sequence learning for video captioning,
17
SETI@Home application, 258
SEVIR (Socially Embedded VIsual
Representation Learning) approach,
149
Shaderlight cloud rendering platform, 273
Shallow models and approaches
audition, 46
393
intention-oriented image representation
learning, 148–149
Shannon Information Theory, 138
Shape gain in similarity searches, 115, 128
SIDL (Social-embedding Image Distance
Learning) approach, 149–150
SIFT. See Scale invariant feature transform
(SIFT)
Signal processing in encrypted domain
(SPED), 80
applications, 81–83
background, 78–81
benefits, 83–84
introduction, 76–78
Similarity estimation for sketches, 121–123
Similarity searches
background, 106–107
cell-probe algorithms, 113–120
conclusion, 134
evaluation criteria, 109–113
hash functions, 113–118
hybrid approaches, 131–132
introduction, 105–106
non-Euclidean metrics and graph-based
approaches, 132–134
quantization, 127–131
query mechanisms, 118–120
sketches and binary embeddings, 120–
127
types, 107–108
Simulating events in Hawkes processes,
202–205
Situation awareness in SAIS, 268
Situation definitions
data, 168–169
existing, 165–167
features, 169
overview, 164
proposed, 167–168
recognition problem, 168
Situation recognition using multimodal
data
asthma risk-based recommendations,
163
challenges and opportunities, 185–188
394
Index
Situation recognition using multimodal
data (continued)
conclusion, 188–189
eco-system, 162–164
EventShop platform. See EventShop
platform
framework, 170–177
individual behavior, 186–187
introduction, 159–161
missing and uncertain data, 185–186
persuading user action, 187–188
privacy and ethical issues, 188
situation-aware applications, 163–164
situation defined, 164–170
situation estimation, 186
situation evaluation, 174–176
situation responses, 177
workflow, 172–176
Sketches and binary embeddings
hash function design, 123–124
introduction, 120–121
project+take sign approach, 124–127
similarity estimation, 121–123
similarity search, 120–127
SLA in fog computing, 262
Smartphone-Augmented Infrastructure
Sensing (SAIS), 268–272
Social attributes for users and multimedia,
154–155
Social-embedding Image Distance Learning
(SIDL) approach, 149–150
Social graph modeling, 145
Social interactions in multimodal analysis,
55–56
Social knowledge on user-multimedia
interactions, 143
Social representation of multimedia data,
145
Social-sensed multimedia computing
conclusion, 157
demographic information inference from
user-generated content, 147
exemplary applications, 150–153
future directions, 153–157
intention-oriented distance metric
learning, 149–150
intention-oriented image representation
learning, 148–149
introduction, 137–139
MPEG-X, 156–157
multimedia sentiment analysis, 150
overview, 142–144
recent advances, 146–150
reliable data collection, 144–145
semantic gap vs. need gap, 139–141
social attributes for users and
multimedia, 154–155
social representation of multimedia data,
145
social-sensed multimedia recommendation, 151–152
social-sensed multimedia search, 151
social-sensed multimedia summarization, 152–153
social-sensed video communication, 153
user interest modeling from multimedia
data, 147–148
user-multimedia interaction behavior
analysis, 146
user profiling and social graph modeling,
145
Socially Embedded VIsual Representation
Learning (SEVIR) approach, 149
Sociometric badges in SALSA dataset, 58–59
Software as a Service (SaaS) for cloud
gaming, 290
Sound. See Audition for multimedia
computing
Source separation in audition, 36
Space and time (ST) in situation definitions,
166
Space complexity in similarity searches,
111–112
Space-Time ARIMA (STARIMA) models, 186
Sparse coding in object recognition, 234
Spatial inferences in audition, 33
Spatial pyramid histogram representation
in object recognition, 232–234
Index
Spatio-temporal aggregation in situation
recognition, 173–174
Spatio-temporal convolutional networks, 10
Spatio-temporal situations, 168
sPCA algorithm, 277–279
SPED. See Signal processing in encrypted
domain (SPED)
Speech/speaker recognition, 36, 95–99
Sports-1M dataset
LSTM, 12
video classification, 22
ST (space and time) in situation definitions,
166
STARIMA (Space-Time ARIMA) models, 186
Stimuli in emotion and personality type
recognition, 240
Stop-words in similarity searches, 116
Storage in fog computing, 257
Stream selection in situation recognition,
172–173
Structural questions in audition, 33
Structure discovery in audio, 46–47
Structured quantizers in similarity searches,
115–116
STTPoints
EventShop platform, 180–181
situation recognition, 173
Subcritical regime in Hawkes processes,
201
Sum-product of two signals in probabilistic
cryptosystems, 80
Super-bits in sketch similarity, 124
Supercritical regime in Hawkes processes,
201
Supervised deep learning for video
classification, 9–13
Surface information in audition, 47
Surveillance systems, 91
SVC (scalable video coded) videos, 94–95
Synergistic sociAL Scene Analysis (SALSA)
dataset
free-standing conversational groups,
58–59
head and body pose estimation, 66–69
395
System architecture in GamingAnywhere,
293–294
System design in EventShop platform,
178–180
TACoS Multi-Level Corpus (TACoS-ML)
dataset for video classification, 26
Tagging video, 14–19
TDD (trajectory-pooled deep-convolutional
descriptors), 11
Template-based language model for video
captioning, 16–17
Temporal inferences in audition, 33
Temporal segment networks, 11
Temporary engagement in cloud gaming,
311
Thin client design for cloud gaming,
302–306
Thinning algorithm for Hawkes processes,
202–204
Third-party service providers security and
privacy concerns, 75
Throughput-driven GPUs for cloud gaming,
299
THUMOS Challenge, 23
Time complexity in similarity searches,
109–110
Trajectory-pooled deep-convolutional
descriptors (TDD), 11
Transductive support vector machines
(TSVMs), 68
Transferable common principles in social
media, 155
Transmission efficiency in encrypted
multimedia content analysis, 104
TRECVID 2016 Video to Text Description
(TV16-VTT) dataset for video
classification, 27
TRECVID MED dataset for video classification, 21–23
Trust-based approaches in recommender
systems, 152
TSVM (transductive support vector
machines), 68
396
Index
TV16-VTT (TRECVID 2016 Video to Text
Description) dataset for video
classification, 27
Tweets dataset for fog computing, 278–280
Two-layer LSTM networks, 12
Two-stream approach for end-to-end CNN
architectures, 10–11
UCF-101 & THUMOS-2014 dataset for video
classification, 21, 24
Unicast alerts in situation-aware applications, 164
Unimodal approaches for wearable devices,
52
Unitary regularization term in multimodal
pose estimation, 62
Unsupervised hierarchical structure in
audition, 46–47
Unsupervised video feature learning, 13–14
User-centric multimedia computing, 143–
144
User cues
conclusion, 250–251
emotion and personality type recognition, 236–250
eye fixations as implicit annotations for
object recognition, 226–236
introduction, 219–222
scene semantics inferences from eye
movements, 222–226
User-generated content, demographic
information inference from, 147
User interest modeling from multimedia
data, 147–148
User-multimedia interaction behavior
analysis, 146
User profiling, 145
Users, social attributes for, 154–155
VA-files (vector approximation files) for
similarity searches, 109–110
Valence dimensions in emotion and
personality type recognition, 236–
237, 243–247
Vanishing gradients in recurrent neural
networks, 7
Variable bit rate (VBR) encoding in
speech/speaker recognition, 98
Vector approximation files (VA-files) for
similarity searches, 109–110
Vector ARMA (VARMA) models, 186
Vector identifiers in similarity searches, 112
Vector of locally aggregated descriptors
(VLAD)
encoding, 9
in similarity searches, 132
Vegas over Access Point (VoAP) algorithm in
cloud gaming, 309
VGGNet, 5–6, 9
Video
convolutional neural networks, 5–6
introduction, 3–4
recurrent neural networks, 6–8
social-sensed communication, 153
Video captioning
approaches, 16–17
common architecture, 17–18
overview, 14–15
problem, 15–16
research, 23–29
Video classification
overview, 8–9
research, 19–23
supervised deep learning, 9–13
unsupervised video feature learning,
13–14
Video in cloud gaming
compression, 307
decoders, 305–306
sharing, 311–312
Video processing in encrypted domain
introduction, 91
making video data unrecognizable, 91–92
secure domains for video encoding,
92–93
security implementation, 93–96
VideoLSTM, 13
Viola-Jones face detectors, 225
Index
Virality in Hawkes processes, 201, 210
Virtualization
cloud gaming, 298–302, 312–313
fog computing, 261, 282
Visual data and inertial sensors in head and
body pose estimation, 57
Visual Objects Classes (VOC) challenge in
scene recognition, 226
Visual search (VS) tasks
eye movements, 227–232
scene recognition, 226
Visualization
EventShop platform, 182
situation recognition, 173
VLAD (vector of locally aggregated
descriptors)
encoding, 9
in similarity searches, 132
VoAP (Vegas over Access Point) algorithm in
cloud gaming, 309
VOC (Visual Objects Classes) challenge in
scene recognition, 226
VOC2012 dataset, 227
Vocal sounds, 45
Voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) traffic,
95–99
Volunteer computing in fog computing, 258
Voronoi diagrams for similarity searches,
109
Voting, SPED for, 81
397
Watermarking, SPED for, 81
Weak and opportunistic supervision in
audition, 48–49
Wearable sensing devices, 52
head and body pose estimation, 58
multimodal analysis of social interactions, 55–56
SALSA dataset, 58
Weizmann dataset for video classification,
20
Windows platforms for GamingAnywhere,
295–296
Wisdom sources in eco-systems, 162
Wonder Shaper for fog computing, 283
Word-of-mouth diffusion
Hawkes processes, 210
point processes, 192
Wrappers in EventShop platform, 181
Xen technology in fog computing, 282
XFINITY Games, 310
Yahoo Flickr Creative Commons 100 Million
dataset (YFCC100M) for audition,
39
YouCook dataset for video classification, 26
Zero-knowledge watermark detection
protocol, 81
ZYNC cloud rendering platform, 273
Editor Biography
Shih-Fu Chang
Shih-Fu Chang is the Richard Dicker Professor at
Columbia University, with appointments in both
Electrical Engineering Department and Computer
Science Department. His research is focused on multimedia information retrieval, computer vision, machine learning, and signal processing. A primary goal
of his work is to develop intelligent systems that
can extract rich information from the vast amount
of visual data such as those emerging on the Web,
collected through pervasive sensing, or available in
gigantic archives. His work on content-based visual
search in the early 90s—VisualSEEk and VideoQ—set the foundation of this vibrant
area. Over the years, he continued to develop innovative solutions for image/video
recognition, multimodal analysis, visual content ontology, image authentication,
and compact hashing for large-scale indexing. His work has had major impacts
in various applications like image/video search engines, online crime prevention,
mobile product search, AR/VR, and brain machine interfaces.
His scholarly work can be seen in more than 350 peer-reviewed publications,
many best-paper awards, more than 30 issued patents, and technologies licensed to
seven companies. He was listed as the Most Influential Scholar in the field of Multimedia by Aminer in 2016. For his long-term pioneering contributions, he has been
awarded the IEEE Signal Processing Society Technical Achievement Award, ACM
Multimedia Special Interest Group Technical Achievement Award, Honorary Doctorate from the University of Amsterdam, the IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award, and IBM
Faculty Award. For his contributions to education, he received the Great Teacher
Award from the Society of Columbia Graduates. He served as Chair of ACM SIGMM
400
Editor Biography
(2013–2017), Chair of Columbia Electrical Engineering Department (2007–2010),
the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Signal Processing Magazine (2006–2008), and advisor for several international research institutions and companies. In his current
capacity as Senior Executive Vice Dean at Columbia Engineering, he plays a key role
in the School’s strategic planning, special research initiatives, international collaboration, and faculty development. He is a Fellow of the American Association for
the Advancement of Science (AAAS), a Fellow of the IEEE, and a Fellow of the ACM.
| 1cs.CV
|
1
FLiER: Practical Topology Update Detection Using
Sparse PMUs
arXiv:1409.6644v3 [cs.SY] 22 Jul 2016
C. Ponce D. S. Bindel
Abstract—In this paper, we present a Fingerprint Linear
Estimation Routine (FLiER) to identify topology changes in
power networks using readings from sparsely-deployed phasor
measurement units (PMUs). When a power line, load, or generator trips in a network, or when a substation is reconfigured,
the event leaves a unique “voltage fingerprint” of bus voltage
changes that we can identify using only the portion of the network
directly observed by the PMUs. The naive brute-force approach
to identify a failed line from such voltage fingerprints, though
simple and accurate, is slow. We derive an approximate algorithm
based on a local linearization and a novel filtering approach that
is faster and only slightly less accurate. We present experimental
results using the IEEE 57-bus, IEEE 118-bus, and Polish 19992000 winter peak networks.
Index Terms—topology changes, phasor measurement units,
voltage fingerprint, approximation, linearization, filtering
I. I NTRODUCTION
A. Motivation
Detection of topology changes is an important network
monitoring function, and is a key part of the power grid
state estimation pipeline, either as a pre-processing step or
as an integrated part of a generalized state estimator. If a
topology error processing module fails to detect an error in
the model topology, poor and even dangerous control actions
may result [1], [2], as unexpected topology changes, such as
those due to failed lines, may put stress on the remaining lines
and destabilize the network. Thus, it is important to identify
topology changes quickly in order to take appropriate control
actions.
Substations and transmission lines in transmission networks
have sensors that directly report failures (or switch open/closed
status). However, if a sensor malfunctions, then finding the
topology change is again difficult. This can happen due to
normal equipment malfunctions, or because a cyber-attacker
wishes to mislead network operators. Although failure to
The information, data, or work presented herein was funded in part by
the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E), U.S. Department
of Energy, under Award Number de-ar0000230. The information, data, or
work presented herein was funded in part by an agency of the United States
Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof,
nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or
assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness,
or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or
represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference
herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade
name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute
or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States
Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors
expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States
Government or any agency thereof.
This research was conducted with Government support under and awarded
by DoD, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science
and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship, 32 CFR 168a
correctly identify a topology error is less common in a
transmission network, the stakes are higher: state estimation
based on incorrect topology assumptions can lead to incorrect
estimates, causing operators to overlook system instability, and
in the worst case, leading to avoidable blackouts. Thus, it
is important to have more than one way to monitor network
topology.
B. Prior work
State estimation and topology detection have co-evolved
since at least the late 1970s [3]; see [4] for an overview of the
state of the art as of 2000. These industry-standard methods
use low time-resolution SCADA data about power flows and
digital status, together with a reference model, to infer system
voltages and currents as well as the current topology. Since
the turn of the century, researchers have increasingly proposed
PMU-based methods for state estimation, model calibration,
fault detection, and wide area monitoring and control [5],
[6], [7]. Some PMU-based methods yield state estimates [8],
[9], information about oscillations [10], [11], [12], [13], and
indicators of faults or contigencies [14], [15] without SCADA
data and with little or no reference to a system model during
regular operation. These “model-free” methods are attractive
because power system models are often not wholly correct.
Current PMU deployments do not provide complete observability of most of the power grids, which has lead to a broad
literature on optimally placing what PMUs are available [16],
[17], [18]. And where PMU data is available, it is much
faster than other data sources: within an operating area,
SCADA sensors typically report at most every few seconds;
and the system data exchange (SDX) model of the North
American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) provides
inter-area topology information only on an hourly basis [19].
According to the IEEE specification, data from a correctly
functioning PMU also satisfy tight phase and magnitude error
tolerances [20]. Hence, many methods combine PMU data,
SCADA data, and model information for state estimation [21],
[22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32],
[33] and for detection and localization of faults [34], [35],
[36], [37], [38], [14], [39], [15], [40], [41], [42], [43].
Conventional state estimators use loss functions such as
least absolute variation (LAV) or Huber loss [44], [21] for
robustness to inconsistent outlier equations caused by bad data
or by errors in the model topology. The shape of residuals
associated with the outlier equations reflects topology errors,
and a quarter century of work on topology estimators exploits
this [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]. Robust regression is also
used in many hybrid state estimators [21], [22], [25], [31],
2
as deployed PMUs sometimes have errors greater than those
nominally allowed by the IEEE standard [?], [?], [?], [?],
whether due to poor GPS synchronization (which may cause
persistent phase errors), deficiencies in the signal processing
algorithms (which may cause oscillations in the PMU output),
or other issues. The methods in this paper use differences
between PMU predictions, so are insensitive to absolute
phase errors; and we filter the signal to reduce sensitivity to
deficiencies in signal processing algorithms and to ambient
oscillations. Nonetheless, we also use robust regression to
defend against other types of sensor errors.
Because PMUs measure current and voltage phasors directly, PMU-assisted methods can observe topology changes
even in the sparse case when there is not a measurement
directly incident on the affected element. This is the basis for
several methods for line outage detection; the closest to our
work is [34], though other closely related work includes [35],
[36], [37]. Our work extends these prior approaches by using
PMU signals to identify not only line trips, but also load trips,
generator trips, and substation reconfigurations. As with many
SCADA topology estimation techniques, we model possible
substation reconfigurations using a breaker-level model [51],
[52], [53], [44], [54]. In the SCADA literature, one sometimes
uses expanded bus-section models only in regions where a
substation reconfiguration is suspected [55], but we use a fixed
breaker-level model and an extended system with a minimal
set of multipliers corresponding to the edges in trees associated
with each connected set of bus sections [56], [57].
C. Our work
We present here an efficient method to identify topology
changes in networks with a (possibly small) number of PMUs.
We assume that a complete state estimate is obtained shortly
before a topology change, e.g. through conventional SCADA
measurements, and we use discrepancies between this state
estimate and PMU measurements to identify failures. Our
method does not require complete observability from PMU
data; it performs well even when there are few PMUs in
the network, though having more PMUs does improve the
accuracy. Though our approach is similar in spirit to [34],
this paper makes three key novel contributions:
• We treat not only line outages, but also load trips,
generator trips, and substation reconfigurations. This is
not new for standard topology estimators, but to our
knowledge it is new for PMU-based methods.
• We describe a novel subspace-based filtering method to
rule out candidate topology changes at low cost.
• We take advantage of existing state estimation procedures
by linearizing the full AC power flow about a previously
estimated state. This increases accuracy compared to the
DC approximation used in prior work.
II. P ROBLEM F ORMULATION
AND
F INGERPRINTS
Let yik = gik + bik denote the elements of the admittance
matrix Y ∈ Cn×n in a bus-branch network model; let Pℓ and
Qℓ denote the real and reactive power injections at bus ℓ; and
let vℓ = |vℓ | exp(θℓ ) denote the voltage phasor at bus ℓ. These
quantities are related by the power flow equations
H(v; Y ) − s = 0
(1)
where
X
n
gℓh
Hℓ
=
|vℓ ||vh |
−bℓh
Hn+ℓ
h=1
with θℓh = θℓ − θh and
s = P1 · · ·
Pn
Q1
bℓh
gℓh
cos(θℓh )
,
sin(θℓh )
(2)
T
(3)
···
Qn
.
We note that H is quadratic in v, but linear Y .
In a breaker-level model, we use a similar system in which
variables are associated with bus sections, and H represents
the power flows when all breakers are open. We then write
the power flow equations as
H(v; Y ) + Cλ − s = 0
C T v = b,
(4)
where the constraint equations C T v = b have the form
cTk v = (ei − ej )T v = vi − vj = bk = 0,
i.e. voltage variable j for a “slave” bus section is constrained
to be the same as voltage variable i for a “master” bus section.
In addition, we include constraints of the form
cTk v = eTi v = bk
to assign a voltage magnitude at a PV bus or the phase angle
at a slack bus. We could trivially eliminate these constraints,
but keep them explicit for notational convenience.
Our goal is to use the power flow equations to diagnose
topology changes such as single line failures, substation reconfigurations, or load or generator trips. We assume the
network remains stable and the state shifts from one quasisteady state to another. In practice, of course, there may be
oscillations, whether due to ringdown after a topology change
or ambient forcing; hence we recommend applying a low-pass
filter to extract the mean behavior at each quasi-steady state.
Under a topology update, the voltage vector shifts from v
to v̂ = v + ∆v. We assume m voltage phasor components,
indicated by the rows of E ∈ {0, 1}m×n, are directly observed
by PMUs, with appropriate filtering. Assuming the loads and
generation vary slowly, modulo high-frequency fluctuations
removed by the low-pass filter, we can predict what E∆v
should be for each possible contingency. That is, we can
match the observed voltage changes E∆v to a list of voltage
fingerprints to identify simple topology changes. We note that
the same approach used to produce fingerprints for load and
generator trips can also be used to identify significant changes
in load or generation at a single source.
Multiple contingencies can have the same or practically
indistinguishable fingerprints. For example, one of two parallel
lines with equal admittance may fail, or two lines that are
distant from all PMUs but near each other may yield similar
fingerprints. But even when a contingency is not identifiable,
our method still produces valuable information. When multiple
lines have the same effect on the network, our technique can
be used to identify a small set of potential lines or breakers
to inspect more closely.
3
III. A PPROXIMATE F INGERPRINTS
To compute the exact fingerprint for a contingency, we
require a nonlinear power flow solve. In a large network
with many possible contingencies, this computation becomes
expensive. We approximate the changing voltage in each
contingency by linearizing the AC power flow equations about
the pre-contingency state. As in methods based on the DC
approximation, we use the structure of changes to the linearized system to compute voltage change fingerprints for each
contingency with a few linear solves. By using information
about the current state, we observe better diagnostic accuracy
with our AC linearization than with the DC approximation.
We consider three different types of contingencies: bus
merging or bus splitting due to substation reconfiguration, and
line failure. In each case, we assume the pre-contingency state
is x = (v, λ) satisfying (4). We denote the post-contingency
state by primed variables x′ = (v ′ , λ′ ); we assume in general
that the power injections s are the same before and after the
contingency. The exact shift in state is ∆x′ = x′ − x, and
our approximate fingerprints are based from the approximation
δx′ ≈ ∆x to the shift in state. The computation of δx′ for each
contingency involves the pre-contingency Jacobian matrix
∂H
(v; Y ) C
∂v
.
A=
CT
0
We assume a factorization of A is available, perhaps from a
prior state estimate.
A. Bus Merging Fingerprints
In the case of two bus sections becoming electrically tied
due to a breaker closing, we augment C by two additional
constraints C ′ to tie together the voltage magnitudes and phase
angles of the previously-separate bus sections. That is, the
post-contingency state satisfies the augmented system
H(v ′ ; Y ) + Cλ′ + C ′ γ − s = 0
C T v′ = b
(5)
′T ′
C v = 0.
We linearize (5) about the original state x (with γ = 0);
because the first two equations are satisfied at this state, we
have the approximate system
′
A U δx′
0
C
=
−
,
U
=
(6)
UT 0
γ
C ′T v
0
The slack variables γ let the voltage phasor for a “breakaway”
group of previously-slaved sections differ from a phasor at the
former master section. The two columns of F ∈ {0, 1}n×2
indicate rows of C T that constrain the breakaway voltage
magnitudes and the phase angles, respectively. The third
equation says no power flows across the open breaker.
We linearize (9) about the original state x (with γ = 0);
because the first two equations are satisfied at this state, we
have the approximate system
A U δx′
0
0
=
−
,
U
=
.
(10)
UT 0
γ
FTλ
F
The bordered systems (10) has the same form as (6); and, as
before, block Gaussian elimination requires only two solves
with A, some dot products, and a 2 × 2 system solve.
C. Load/Generator Trip Fingerprints
When a load or generator trips offline, that bus becomes
a zero-injection PQ nodes. In the case of a PQ load tripping
offline, the network itself does not change, so we do not need
to augment the matrix A as is done in Equations (6) and
(10), but we compute the approximate fingerprint with just
A. Rather, it is the power injection vector s that changes.
In the case of a generator at a PV bus tripping offline,
we need to convert that bus into a PQ bus with zero power
injection. We write the augmented system
H(v ′ ; Y ) + Cλ′ − s′ = 0
C T v′ + f γ = b
T
(11)
′
f λ = 0.
The slack variable γ lets the voltage magnitude of the bus
of interest shift. The vector f is an indicator vector such that
the third equation constrains the reactive power injection slack
variable to zero. Note that s has also been changed to s′ to
represent the real power injection shifting to zero.
The resulting system is
A u δx′
0
0
=
−
,
u
=
.
(12)
uT 0
γ
fT λ
f
The bordered system (12) has the same form as (10) and (6).
In this case, only one solve with A is required.
We then solve the system by block elimination to obtain
γ = (U T A−1 U )−1 (C ′T v)
′
−1
δx = −A
Uγ
(7)
(8)
The formulas (7)–(8) only require two significant linear solves
(to evaluate A−1 U ), some dot products, and a 2 × 2 solve.
B. Bus Splitting Fingerprints
When a bus splits after a breaker opens, the postcontingency state satisfies the augmented system
H(v ′ ; Y ) + Cλ′ − s = 0
C T v′ + F γ = b
T
′
F λ = 0.
(9)
D. Line Failure Fingerprints
In principle, line failures can be handled in the same way as
substation reconfigurations that lead to bus splitting: explicitly
represent two nodes on a line that are normally connected
(physically corresponding to two sides of a breaker) with
a multiplier that forces them to be equal, and compute the
fingerprint by an extended system that negates the effect of
that multiplier. In practice, we may prefer to avoid the extra
variables in this model. The following formulation requires
no explicit extra variables in the base model, and can be used
with either a breaker-level model or a bus-branch model with
no breakers (i.e. C an empty matrix).
4
For line failures, the admittance changes to Y ′ = Y + ∆Y ′
where ∆Y ′ is a rank-one update. The post-contingency state
satisfies the system
More concretely, we have
Uik =
′
′
|vi |2
P̌i − gii
|vi |2
P̌i + gii
−Q̌i − b′ii |vi |2
Q̌k + b′ |vk |2 P̌k − g ′ |vk |2 P̌k + g ′ |vk |2
kk
kk
kk
P̌i − g ′ |vi |2
Q̌i + b′ii |vi |2
Q̌i − b′ii |vi |2
ii
′
−P̌k + gkk
|vk |2 Q̌k + b′kk |vk |2 Q̌k − b′kk |vk |2
1 −1
0
0
0 .
VikT = 0 0 |vi |−1
0 0
0
|vk |−1
H(v ′ ; Y ′ ) + Cλ′ − s = 0
C T v ′ = b,
and linearization about x gives
∂H
′
′
δv
H(v; ∆Y ′ )
∂v (v; Y ) C
=−
0
CT
0 δλ′
(13)
where H(v; ∆Y ′ ) = H(v; Y ′ ) − H(v; Y ). As we show
momentarily,
Because H(v, ∆Y ′ ) does not depend on any voltage phasors
other than those at nodes i and j, we may write
∂H
∂H
∂H
(v; Y ′ ) −
(v; Y ) =
(v; ∆Y ′ ) = U 0 (V 0 )T .
∂v
∂v
∂v
∂H(v; ∆Y ′ )
T
= Eik Dik Eik
= U 0 (V 0 )T
∂v
e ek
∈ R2n×4 .
Eik = i
ei ek
where U 0 and V 0 each have three columns. That is, the matrix
in the system (13) is a rank-three update to A. We can solve
such a system by the Sherman-Morrison-Woodbury update
formula, also widely known as the Inverse Matrix Modification
Lemma [58], [59]. We use the equivalent extended system
′
A
U
δx
r
=
−
,
(14)
V T −I
γ
0
where
U=
U0
,
0
V =
V0
,
0
r=
H(v; ∆Y ′ )
.
0
γ = (I + V T A−1 U )−1 (V T r)
δx′ = −A−1 (r + U γ).
and
U 0 = Eik Uik ,
(16)
′
= P̌ik + gii
|vi |2
Q̌i ≡ Hi+n = Q̌ik − b′ii |vi |2
P̌i
P̌k
0
H(v, ∆Y ′ ) = Eik
Q̌i = U z,
Q̌k
′
= P̌ki + gkk
|vk |2
where
′
P̌ik
gik
≡ |vi ||vk |
−b′ik
Q̌ik
b′ik
′
gik
cos(θik )
,
sin(θik )
and P̌ki , Q̌ki are defined similarly. Let
Dik ≡
∂(P̌i , P̌k , Q̌i , Q̌k )
∈ R4×4 ;
∂(θi , θk , |v|i , |v|k )
by the chain rule, we can write Dik = Uik VikT where
∂(P̌i , P̌k , Q̌i , Q̌k )
∈ R4×3
∂(θik , log |v|i , log |v|k )
∂(θik , log |v|i , log |v|k )
∈ R3×4 .
≡
∂(θi , θk , |v|i , |v|k )
Uik ≡
VikT
(19)
0
z = 1/2 ,
1/2
δx′ = −A−1 U (z + γ).
(20)
IV. F ILTERING
In Section III we discussed how to approximate voltage
shifts δv ′ associated with several types of contingencies. This
approach to predicting voltage changes costs less than a
nonlinear power flow solve, but may still be costly for a large
network with many contingencies to check. In the current
section we show how to rule out contingencies without any
solves by computing a cheap lower bound on the discrepancy
between the observed voltage changes and the predicted voltage changes under the contingencies.
For each contingency, we define the fingerprint score
t = kE∆v − Eδv ′ k
Q̌k ≡ Hk+n = Q̌ki − b′kk |vk |2 ,
V 0 = Eik Vik .
Moreover, we note that
(15)
The work to evaluate (15)–(16) is three linear solves (for
A−1 U ), some dot products, and a small 3 × 3 solve. We will
show momentarily how to avoid the solve involving r.
We now show that the Jacobian matrix changes by a rank-3
update. For a failed line between nodes i and k, the vector
H(v, ∆Y ′ ) has only four nonzero entries:
P̌k ≡ Hk
(18)
so that we may rewrite (16) as
We again solve by block elimination:
P̌i ≡ Hi
where
(17)
(21)
where ∆v is the observed voltage shift and δv ′ is the voltage
shift predicted for the contingency. For the contingencies we
have described, Eδv ′ has the form
Eδv ′ = ĒA−1 U γ
(22)
where Ē = E 0 simply ignores the multiplier variables λ,
and γ is some short vector of slack variables. The expression
ĒA−1 does not depend on the contingency, and can be precomputed at the cost of m linear solves (one per observed
phasor component). After this computation, the main cost in
evaluating (22) is the computation of γ, which involves a
contingency-dependent linear system with A as an intermediate step. However, we do not need γ for the filter score
τ = min kE∆v − ĒA−1 U µk ≤ t.
µ
(23)
5
PMUs
FLiER
FLiER+noise
DC Approx
DC Approx+noise
Algorithm 1 FLiER
Compute and store ĒA−1 .
For each contingency i, compute τi via (23).
Order the contingencies in ascending order by τ .
for ℓ = 2, 3, . . . do
Compute fingerprint score tℓ
Break if tℓ < τℓ+1
end for
Return contingencies with computed tℓ
tk < τi ≤ ti ,
without ever computing ti . Exploiting this fact leads to the
FLiER method (Algorithm 1)1 .
We note that PQ load trips require no filtering, as they
involve no change to the system matrix.
Filter score computations are embarrassingly parallel and
can be spread across processors. Nonetheless, for huge networks with many PMUs and many contingencies, the filter
computations might be deemed too expensive for very rapid
diagnosis (e.g. in less than a second). However, the concept
of a filter subspace can be adapted to these cases. First, one
can define a coarse filtering subspaces that is the sum of the
filtering subspaces for a set of contingencies. For example,
one might define a coarse filtering subspace associated with
all possible breaker reconfigurations inside a substation. The
coarse subspace filter score provides a lower bound on the
filter scores (and hence the fingerprint scores) for all contingencies in the set. Hence, it may not even be necessary to
compute individual filter scores for all contingencies considered. Second, one can work with a projected filtering subspace W T (EA−1 U ) where W is a matrix with orthonormal
columns. The distance from a projected measurement vector
to the projected filtering subspace again gives a lower bound
on the full filter score. In addition to reducing the cost of filter
score computations, projections can also be used to eliminate
faulty or missing PMU measurements from consideration.
V. E XPERIMENTS
Our standard experimental setup is as follows. For each
possible topology change, we compute and pass to FLiER
both the full pre-contingency state and the subset of the postcontingency state that would be observed by the PMUs. We
test both with no noise and with independent random Gaussian
noise with standard deviation 1.7 · 10−3 (≈ 0.1 degrees for
phase angles) added to both the initial state estimate and the
can
be
Sparse
68(77)
66(78)
52(74)
49(64)
All
78(78)
78(78)
72(77)
66(68)
TABLE I
IEEE 57- BUS NETWORK ACCURACY COMPARISON FOR 78 LINE FAILURE
CONTINGENCIES . W E REPORT COUNTS OF LINE FAILURES CORRECTLY
IDENTIFIED AND THOSE SCORED IN THE TOP THREE ( IN PARENTHESES ).
In the Euclidean norm, τ is simply the size of the residual in
a least squares fit of E∆v to the columns of ĒA−1 U , which
can be computed quickly due to the sparsity of U . If U is the
augmentation matrix associated with contingency i, we refer
to ĒA−1 U as its filtering subspace.
Filter score computations are cheap; and if the filter score
τi for contingency i exceeds the fingerprint score tk for
contingency k, then we know
1 Example
Python code of this algorithm
https://github.com/cponce512/FLiER Test Suite
Single
55(73)
40(65)
17(40)
5(22)
found
at
PMU readings. In [34], 0.1 degrees of Gaussian random noise
was applied to phase angles, then smoothed by passing a
simulated time-domain signal through a low pass filter; we
apply the noise without filtering, so the effect is more drastic.
One of the possibilities FLiER checks is that there has been
no change; in this case, we use the norm of the fingerprint as
both the fingerprint score and the filter score. By including this
possibility among those checked, FLiER acts simultaneously
as a method for topology change detection and identification.
We run tests on the IEEE 57 bus and 118 bus networks,
with three different PMU arrangements on each:
• Single: Only one PMU is placed in the network, at a lowdegree node (bus 35 in the 57-bus network and 65 in the
118-bus network, providing a total of 3 and 5 bus voltage
readings, respectively). This represents a near-worst-case
deployment for our method.
• Sparse: A few PMUs are placed about the network (on
buses 4, 13, and 34 in the 57-bus network and on buses 5,
17, 37, 66, 80, and 100 in the 118-bus network, providing
a total of 15 and 40 bus voltage readings, respectively).
We consider this a realistic scenario in which sparselydeployed PMUs do not offer full network observability.
• All: PMUs are placed on all buses. Any error is due
purely to the linear approximation.
We did not test changes that cause convergence failure in our
power flow solver. We assume such contingencies result in
collapse without some control action.
A. Accuracy
1) Line Failures: Figure 1 shows the accuracy of FLiER in
identifying line failures in the IEEE 57-bus test network. For
each PMU deployment, we show the cumulative distribution
function of ranks, i.e. the ranks of each simulated contingency
in the ordered list produced by FLiER. We show further results
in Table I. With PMUs everywhere, the correct answer was
chosen in all 78 of 78 cases, even in the presence of noise. The
case with three PMUs is also quite robust to noise. In the test
with a single unfavorably-placed PMU, FLiER typically ranks
the correct line among the top three in the absence of noise;
with noise, the accuracy degrades, though not completely.
In Figure 2, we repeat the experiment of Figure 1, but
with the DC approximation used in [34] rather than the AC
linearization used in FLiER. We also present comparisons
in Table I. With PMUs everywhere, there is little difference
in accuracy. With fewer PMUs, FLiER is more accurate. In
the sparse case, the DC approximation without noise behaves
similarly to FLiER with noise, while in the single PMU
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Fraction of Tests
All
Sparse
Single
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
Fraction of Tests
1.0
0.6
0.4
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
All
Sparse
Single
Single BF
0.4
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
Fig. 1. Cumulative distribution function showing the fraction of line failures
where FLiER assigned the correct line at most a given rank (up to 10). Top:
Noise-free case. Bottom: Entries with Gaussian noise with σ = 0.0017.
“Single BF” is the result from using a brute-force approach with a single
PMU and represents the signal-to-noise ratio in that PMU’s information.
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
0.6
All
Sparse
Single
Single BF
0.4
0.2
0.0
9 10
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
9 10
Fraction of Tests
Fraction of Tests
6
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
Fig. 2. CDF of line failures where the DC approximation of [34] assigned
the correct line at most a given rank (up to 10). Top: Noise-free case. Bottom:
Entries with Gaussian noise with σ = 0.0017. “Single BF” is the result from
using a brute-force approach with a single PMU and represents the signal-tonoise ratio in that PMU’s information.
deployment the DC results without noise are much worse than
those from FLiER even with noise.
Figure 3 shows the raw scores computed by FLiER with
three PMUs. In this plot, each column represents the fingerprint scores computed for one line failure scenario. The
black crosses represent the scores of lines that get past the
filter, while the green circles and yellow triangles represent the
scores for the correct answer. If there is a green circle, then
our algorithm correctly identified the actual line that failed. If
there is a yellow triangle, the correct line was not chosen but
was among the top three lines selected by the algorithm.
In Figure 4, we show one case that FLiER misidentifies.
PMUs are deployed on buses marked with blue squares, and
lines are colored and thickened according to the FLiER score.
The best-scoring line is adjacent to the line that failed.
2) Substation Reconfigurations: Next, we show the accuracy of FLiER as it applies to substation reconfigurations. For
these tests, we suppose that every bus in the IEEE 57-bus
test network is a ring substation with each bus section on the
ring possessing either load, generation, or a branch. We then
suppose a substation splits when two of its circuit breakers
open. We do not consider cases that isolate a node with a
nonzero power injection. Line failures are a subset of this
scenario: if the breakers on either side of a section with a
branch open, that section becomes a zero-injection leaf bus,
which disappears in the quasi-static setting.
Figure 5 shows the accuracy of FLiER on substation re-
Approximation error
100
10−1
10−2
10−3
10−4
10−5
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Line number (sorted)
Fig. 3.
Test of our algorithm on the IEEE 57-bus network with the
sparse PMU deployment. Each column represents one test. Black crosses are
fingerprint scores for incorrect lines. Green dots and yellow triangles indicate
the scores of the correct line in the case of correct diagnosis or diagnosis in
the top three, respectively.
configurations with and without noise. With three PMUs and
no noise, FLiER is right in 164 of 193 possibilities, and
ranks the correct answer among the top three scores in 160
cases. With PMUs everywhere, FLiER is right 181 times, but
gets the answer in the top three every single time. With few
PMUs, FLiER is more susceptible to noise when diagnosing
substation reconfigurations. This is expected, as there are
significantly more possibilities to choose from in this case.
Also, FLiER sometimes filters out the correct answer in the
presence of noise. One possible remedy for this would be to be
7
Contingency
Correct %
Top 3 %
26
75.2
95.4
Substation
of contingency
85.4
96.5
TABLE II
A CCURACY OF FL I ER WITH 100 RANDOMLY- PLACED PMU S ON THE
P OLISH NETWORK . R ESULTS ARE OUT OF 6283 TESTS .
24
27
1.0
Fig. 4.
Line (24, 26) isqthe line removed in this test. Lines are colored and
thickened according to t−1
ik . Line (26, 27) was chosen by the algorithm.
Fraction of Tests
28
0.8
0.6
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
1.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
9 10
1.0
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
0.8
0.6
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
1.0
0.0
Fraction of Tests
8
0.6
Fraction of Tests
Fraction of Tests
0.0
0.8
0.8
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
0.6
All
Sparse
Single
Single BF
0.4
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
Fig. 5. Rank CDF for substation reconfigurations without noise (top) and with
noise (bottom). “Single BF” is the result from using a brute-force approach
with a single PMU and represents the signal-to-noise ratio in that PMU’s
information.
more lenient with filtering, only throwing a possibility away
if τℓ is greater than the kth smallest tℓ , for example.
Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of using FLiER
for substation reconfigurations on a large-scale network by
running FLiER on the 400, 220, and 100 kV subset of
the Polish network during peak conditions of the 1999-2000
winter, taken from [60]. This is a larger network with 2,383
buses. We placed 100 PMUs randomly around the network,
and tested every substation reconfiguration contingency. We
summarize the results in Table II. We could likely further
improve the accuracy with a thoughtful deployment of PMUs.
3) Including Load and Generator Trips: Here we include
load and generator trips in our results. In Figure 6, we show
Fig. 6. Rank CDF for generator trips without noise (top) and with noise
(bottom).
the results of testing for generator trips, in Figure 7, we show
the results of testing for load trips, and in Figure 8, we show
the results of including load and generator trips in the set of
contingencies to test and check for along with substation splits.
All tests use the IEEE 57-bus network.
In the noisy case for Figure ??, we allow some extra slack
in the filtering procedure. In particular, rather than checking if
tk < τi , we check if tk < τi − σ, where σ is the standard
deviation of the included noise. We did this because the
filtering method sometimes filtered out the correct answer for
load trips. In a real-world setting one would need to choose
that slack value intelligently, but this test shows that slightly
less-stringent filtering can improve the method in some cases.
4) PMU Placement: Here we demonstrate the robustness of
FLiER to PMU placement. We tested this by sampling three
busses from the IEEE 57-bus network uniformly at random,
running FLiER for the substation reconfiguration case (as in
Figure 5) and recording the fraction of contingencies FLiER
identified correctly, and the fraction of contingencies with the
solution ranked in the top 3. We performed this test 200 times.
We show cumulative distribution functions for the fraction
correct and fraction in the top 3 in Figure 9.
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
0.6
0.4
1.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
All
Sparse
Single
Single BF
0.4
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
Fig. 7. Rank CDF for load trips without noise (top) and with noise (bottom).
In the noisy case, we allow a filtering slack equal to one noise standard
deviation, as otherwise the filter is too stringent. “Single BF” is the result from
using a brute-force approach with a single PMU and represents the signalto-noise ratio in that PMU’s information. We do not include zero-injection
busses in this test.
This figure shows that FLiER tends to be quite robust
to PMU placement. In fact, the median fraction correct and
median fraction in top 3 are only slightly below those for the
noiseless test in Figure 5, where we attempted to place the
three PMUs favorably. Furthermore, the standard deviation for
fraction correct is only 3.65%, while the standard deviation for
fraction in top 3 is 2.67%.
5) Robustness to Bad Data: Here we demonstrate how one
can easily modify FLiER for enhanced robustness to bad data
and heavy-tailed noise. In Equations (21) and (23), we use the
L2 loss function to measure the distance between an estimated
fingerprint or subspace and the actual fingerprint. The L2 loss
function, while simple and useful, is sensitive to outliers. A
single large error component drastically increases the t or τ
value, even if all other components have very small error. The
result is using the L2 loss can make FLiER sensitive to bad
data and heavy-tailed noise.
An alternative is to use a loss function that is robust to large
outliers. One popular such loss function is the Huber loss [44]:
kek2H =
Lδ (ei )
m
X
Lδ (ei )
i=1
1 2
2 ei
=
δ |ei | − 12 δ
(24)
|ei | ≤ δ
otherwise
(25)
This function behaves like the L2 loss for error components
near zero, but for error components larger than δ, the loss
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
0.6
All
Sparse
Single
Single BF
0.4
0.2
0.0
9 10
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
9 10
Fraction of Tests
Fraction of Tests
Fraction of Tests
1.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
Fig. 8. Rank CDF for substation reconfigurations and load/generator trips
without noise (top) and with noise (bottom). “Single BF” is the result from
using a brute-force approach with a single PMU and represents the signal-tonoise ratio in that PMU’s information.
1.0
Fraction of Samples
Fraction of Tests
8
0.8
Correct
Top 3
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00
Fraction Correct/Fraction Top3
Fig. 9. CDF for fraction of substation reconfiguration contingencies that
FLiER gets correct (blue) and in the top 3 (green) with random uniform
placement of three PMUs. Noise is not included in this test.
grows linearly rather than quadratically. The result is a loss
function that is robust to outliers in data.
In Figures 10 and 11 we show the usefulness of the Huber
loss in certain cases. In Figure 10, we run FLiER on the line
failures test (as in the noisy case of Figure 1), but with the
PMU reading from bus 4 given a large post-event bias, always
returning an after-event angle reading that is 5 degrees too
large. As shown in the figure, this single bad reading can
cause major problems with FLiER accuracy using L2 loss.
With Huber loss, however, that bad data is almost completely
ignored, resulting in accuracy essentially identical to that of
the noisy case in Figure 1.
9
0.8
0.6
0.4
L2 Loss
Huber Loss
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
0.0
9 10
Fig. 10. CDF for line failures with a single PMU reading that systematically
gives angle readings that are too large by 5 degrees, along with Gaussian
random noise with standard deviation 0.0017. PMUs are at locations 4, 13,
and 34. Huber scale parameter δ = 1.365 · 0.0017
Fraction of Tests
Fraction of lines filtered
1.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Fraction of failure scenarios
0.6
0.8
0.6
0.4
All
Sparse
Single
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Fraction of failure scenarios
0.4
L2 Loss
Huber Loss
0.2
0.0
1
2
3
4
5 6
Rank
7
8
9 10
1.0
1.0
Fraction of lines filtered
Fraction of Tests
1.0
1.0
Fig. 12. Cumulative distribution function of fraction of lines for which
tik need not be computed when a line in the IEEE 57-bus (top) or 118-bus
(bottom) network fails uniformly at random.
Fig. 11. CDF for substation reconfigurations with Cauchy noise with a scale
parameter of 0.001.
In Figure 11, we show the utility of the Huber loss in
the presence of heavy-tailed noise. Here we test substation
reconfigurations with noise given by a Cauchy distribution
with scale parameter 0.001. As shown in the figure, the use
of the Huber loss significantly improves FLiER’s performance
under this type of noise.
It is unclear if either of these situations are likely to arise
in practice. In the former case (with a bad PMU), it is likely
that this bad data stream would be identified in an earlier state
estimation stage and already removed from the fingerprint. In
the latter case, the IEEE specification [20] requires that the
PMU noise profile not have heavy tails, so systematic heavytailed noise is unlikely.
B. Filter Effectiveness and Speed
The cost of FLiER depends strongly on the effectiveness
of the filtering procedure. In Figure 12, we show how often
the filter saves us from computing fingerprint scores in experiments on the IEEE 57-bus and 118-bus networks when
checking for line failures. For each PMU deployment, we
show the cumulative distribution function of the fraction of
lines for which fingerprint scores need not be computed for
each line failure. The filter performs well even for the sparse
PMU deployments; we show a typical case in Figure 13.
Approximation error
100
10−1
10−2
10−3
10−4
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Line number (sorted)
Fig. 13.
Example of effective filtering in Algorithm 1. Each column
represents a line checked. Blue dots are the lower bounds τik , while red
squares are true scores tik . Columns are sorted by τik . In this case, tik only
needs to be computed for eight lines.
Finally, we demonstrate the importance of the filter by
running FLiER on the large Polish network [60] with 100
randomly placed PMUs. Table III shows FLiER run times with
and without the filter on ten randomly selected branches. The
code is unoptimized Python, so these timings do not indicate of
how fast FLiER would run in a performance setting. However,
they give a sense of the speedup one expects from filtering.
Note also that FLiER correctly identified the failed branch
in 9 of 10 cases. In the one case in which it failed, on branch
(2346, 2341), tℓ for the correct answer was 6.25 · 10−5 ; this
suggests the failure had a negligible impact on the network.
We also performed this timing test for a randomly selected
10
Line
(1502, 917)
(1502, 1482)
(557, 556)
(2346, 2341)
(909, 1155)
(644, 629)
(591, 737)
(559, 542)
(378, 336)
(101, 94)
FLiER (s)
0.27
0.27
0.27
2.95
0.26
0.29
0.29
0.32
0.28
0.26
Solution
rank
1
1
1
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
# t’s
computed
2
2
4
502
2
7
6
13
6
2
FLiER n.f. (s)
14.14
15.30
14.75
14.40
14.32
14.59
17.27
16.59
16.16
15.29
TABLE III
FL I ER RUN TIMES FOR TEN LINE FAILURES WITH AND WITHOUT
FILTERING . A BOUT 3000 CONTINGENCIES ARE CONSIDERED .
Bus /
Split nodes
86/1,2,3
176/1,2
539/7
702/4,5
754/2,3,4,5
994/2,3,4,5
1131/2
1513/4,5,6
1663/1,2,3,4
2164/5
FLiER (s)
4.54
4.70
8.11
4.66
4.97
4.86
5.22
6.65
7.83
4.56
Sol. rank /
Sol. bus rank
1/1
3/3
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
1/1
4/1
1/1
1/1
# t’s
computed
2
4
38
4
7
6
9
23
35
3
FLiER n.f. (s)
823.0
836.9
829.8
820.1
829.8
835.8
850.3
862.3
928.1
875.3
TABLE IV
FL I ER RUN TIMES FOR TEN SUBSTATION RECONFIGURATIONS WITH AND
WITHOUT FILTERING . N EARLY 7000 CONTINGENCIES ARE CONSIDERED .
set of substation reconfigurations, shown in Table IV. Again,
the results give a sense of the speedup one expects from
filtering in the substation reconfiguration case.
VI. C ONCLUSION AND F UTURE W ORK
We have presented FLiER, a new algorithm to identify
topology changes involving load and generator trips, line
outages, and substation reconfigurations using a sparse deployment of PMUs. Our method uses a linearization of the power
flow equations together with a novel subspace-based filtering
approach to provide fast diagnosis. Unlike prior approaches
based on DC approximation, our approach takes advantage of
a state estimate obtained shortly before the topology changes,
assuming that the network specifications remain unchanged or
change in a known way as a result of the failure.
Several extensions remain open for future work. We hope
to model noise sensitivity of our computations, so that we can
provide approximate confidence intervals for fingerprint and
filter scores; we also believe it possible to diagnose when the
linear approximation will lead to incorrect diagnosis, and do
more computation to deal just with those cases. In addition,
we plan to extend our approach to other events, such as
single-phase line failures or changes in line parameters due
to overloading.
R EFERENCES
[1] A. Ashok and M. Govindarasu, “Cyber attacks on power system state
estimation through topology errors,” in IEEE PES Meeting, 2012, pp.
1–8.
[2] E. Caro, A. J. Conejo, and A. Abur, “Breaker status identification,” IEEE
Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 694–702, 2010.
[3] R. Lugtu, D. Hackett, K. Liu, and D. Might, “Power system state estimation: Detection of topological errors,” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus
and Syst., vol. PAS-99, no. 6, pp. 2406–2412, 1980.
[4] A. Monticelli, “Electric power system state estimation,” Proc. IEEE,
vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 262–282, 2000.
[5] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, A. Safdarian, A. Davoudi, and
M. Shahidehpour, “Synchrophasor measurement technology in power
systems: Panorama and state-of-the-art,” IEEE Access, vol. 2, pp. 1607–
1628, 2014.
[6] J. D. L. Ree, V. Centeno, J. S. Thorp, and A. G. Phadke, “Synchronized
phasor measurement applications in power systems,” IEEE Transactions
on Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–27, June 2010.
[7] A. G. Phadke and J. S. Thorp, Synchronized Phasor Measurements and
Their Applications. New York: Springer, 2008.
[8] T. Yang, H. Sun, and A. Bose, “Transition to a two-level linear state
estimator - part I: Architecture,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1,
pp. 46–53, 2011.
[9] ——, “Transition to a two-level linear state estimator - part II: Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54–62, 2011.
[10] N. Zhou, D. J. Trudnowski, J. W. Pierre, and W. A. Mittelstadt,
“Electromechanical mode online estimation using regularized robust rls
methods,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 23, no. 4, pp.
1670–1680, Nov 2008.
[11] N. Zhou, J. W. Pierre, and D. Trudnowski, “A stepwise regression
method for estimating dominant electromechanical modes,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1051–1059, May 2012.
[12] L. Dosiek, J. W. Pierre, and J. Follum, “A recursive maximum likelihood
estimator for the online estimation of electromechanical modes with
error bounds,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp.
441–451, Feb 2013.
[13] L. Dosiek, N. Zhou, J. W. Pierre, Z. Huang, and D. J. Trudnowski,
“Mode shape estimation algorithms under ambient conditions: A comparative review,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2,
pp. 779–787, May 2013.
[14] T. Guo and J. V. Milanovi, “Online identification of power system
dynamic signature using pmu measurements and data mining,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1760–1768, May
2016.
[15] L. Xie, Y. Chen, and P. R. Kumar, “Dimensionality reduction of
synchrophasor data for early event detection: Linearized analysis,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2784–2794, Nov
2014.
[16] V. Madani, M. Parashar, J. Giri, S. Durbha, F. Rahmatian, D. Day,
M. Adamiak, and G. Sheble, “Pmu placement considerations – a
roadmap for optimal pmu placement,” in Power Systems Conference
and Exposition (PSCE), 2011 IEEE/PES, March 2011, pp. 1–7.
[17] N. M. Manousakis, G. N. Korres, and P. S. Georgilakis, “Taxonomy of
pmu placement methodologies,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,
vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1070–1077, May 2012.
[18] A. S. Deese, T. Nugent, and S. Coppi, “A comparative study of optimal
pmu placement algorithms for cost minimization,” in 2014 IEEE PES
General Meeting — Conference Exposition, July 2014, pp. 1–5.
[19] U.S.-Canada Power
System Outage Task Force, “Final
report on the implementation of the task force recommendation,”
Available
http://energy.gov/oe/downloads/
blackout-2003-blackout-final-implementation-report,
September
2006.
[20] K. E. Martin, G. Brunello, M. G. Adamiak, G. Antonova, M. Begovic,
G. Benmouyal, P. D. Bui, H. Falk, V. Gharpure, A. Goldstein, Y. Hu,
C. Huntley, T. Kase, M. Kezunovic, A. Kulshrestha, Y. Lu, R. Midence,
J. Murphy, M. Patel, F. Rahmatian, V. Skendzic, B. Vandiver, and
A. Zahid, “An overview of the ieee standard c37.118.2. – synchrophasor
data transfer for power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid,
vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1980–1984, July 2014.
[21] M. Gl and A. Abur, “Lav based robust state estimation for systems
measured by pmus,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4,
pp. 1808–1814, July 2014.
[22] J. Zhao, G. Zhang, K. Das, G. N. Korres, N. M. Manousakis, A. K.
Sinha, and Z. He, “Power system real-time monitoring by using pmubased robust state estimation method,” IEEE Transactions on Smart
Grid, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 300–309, Jan 2016.
[23] L. Hu, Z. Wang, I. Rahman, and X. Liu, “A constrained optimization
approach to dynamic state estimation for power systems including pmu
and missing measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems
Technology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 703–710, March 2016.
11
[24] A. R. Salgado, C. R. F. Esquivel, and J. G. C. Guizar, “Scada and pmu
measurements for improving power system state estimation,” IEEE Latin
America Transactions, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 2245–2251, July 2015.
[25] G. Valverde, S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, and V. Terzija, “A constrained formulation for hybrid state estimation,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1102–1109, Aug 2011.
[26] E. Ghahremani and I. Kamwa, “Dynamic state estimation in power
system by applying the extended kalman filter with unknown inputs to
phasor measurements,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 26,
no. 4, pp. 2556–2566, Nov 2011.
[27] M. Glavic and T. V. Cutsem, “Reconstructing and tracking network
state from a limited number of synchrophasor measurements,” IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1921–1929, May
2013.
[28] A. S. Costa, A. Albuquerque, and D. Bez, “An estimation fusion
method for including phasor measurements into power system real-time
modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp.
1910–1920, May 2013.
[29] K. Das, J. Hazra, D. P. Seetharam, R. K. Reddi, and A. K. Sinha,
“Real-time hybrid state estimation incorporating scada and pmu measurements,” in 2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies
Europe (ISGT Europe), Oct 2012, pp. 1–8.
[30] P. Yang, Z. Tan, A. Wiesel, and A. Nehorai, “Power system state estimation using pmus with imperfect synchronization,” IEEE Transactions
on Power Systems, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4162–4172, Nov 2013.
[31] M. Gl and A. Abur, “A hybrid state estimator for systems with limited
number of pmus,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 3,
pp. 1511–1517, May 2015.
[32] ——, “A fast decoupled state estimator for systems measured by pmus,”
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2766–2771,
Sept 2015.
[33] N. Kashyap, S. Werner, Y. F. Huang, and T. Riihonen, “Power system
state estimation under incomplete pmu observability – a reduced-order
approach,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8,
no. 6, pp. 1051–1062, Dec 2014.
[34] J. E. Tate and T. J. Overbye, “Line outage detection using phasor angle
measurements,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1644–1652,
2008.
[35] ——, “Double line outage detection using phasor angle measurements,”
in IEEE PES Meeting. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1–5.
[36] H. Zhu and G. B. Giannakis, “Lassoing line outages in the smart power
grid,” in SmargGridComm. IEEE, 2011, pp. 570–575.
[37] ——, “Sparse overcomplete representations for efficient identification
of power line outages,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp.
2215–2224, 2012.
[38] P. Bhui and N. Senroy, “Online identification of tripped line for transient
stability assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31,
no. 3, pp. 2214–2224, May 2016.
[39] G. Feng and A. Abur, “Fault location using wide-area measurements
and sparse estimation,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 31,
no. 4, pp. 2938–2945, July 2016.
[40] O. Gmez, C. Portilla, and M. A. Ros, “Reliability analysis of substation
monitoring systems based on branch pmus,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 962–969, March 2015.
[41] C. Chen, J. Wang, and H. Zhu, “Effects of phasor measurement
uncertainty on power line outage detection,” IEEE Journal of Selected
Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1127–1139, Dec 2014.
[42] S. Azizi and M. Sanaye-Pasand, “A straightforward method for widearea fault location on transmission networks,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Delivery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 264–272, Feb 2015.
[43] J. Wu, J. Xiong, and Y. Shi, “Efficient location identification of multiple
line outages with limited pmus in smart grids,” IEEE Transactions on
Power Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1659–1668, July 2015.
[44] L. Mili, G. Steeno, F. Dobraca, and D. French, “A robust estimation
method for topology error identification,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst.,
vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1469–1476, 1999.
[45] M. R. Irving and M. J. H. Sterling, “Substation data validation,” in IEE
Proc. C, vol. 129, no. 3. IET, 1982, pp. 119–122.
[46] K. Clements and P. Davis, “Detection and identification of topology
errors in electric power systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 3, no. 4,
pp. 1748–1753, 1988.
[47] F. F. Wu and W.-H. E. Liu, “Detection of topology errors by state
estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 176–183, 1989.
[48] I. Costa and J. Leao, “Identification of topology errors in power system
state estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1531–1538,
1993.
[49] A. Abur, H. Kim, and M. Celik, “Identifying the unknown circuit breaker
statuses in power networks,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, no. 4,
pp. 2029–2037, 1995.
[50] H. Singh and F. L. Alvarado, “Network topology determination using
least absolute value state estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10,
no. 3, pp. 1159–1165, 1995.
[51] A. Monticelli and A. Garcia, “Modeling zero impedance branches in
power system state estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 6, no. 4,
pp. 1561–1570, 1991.
[52] A. Monticelli, “Modeling circuit breakers in weighted least squares state
estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1143–1149, 1993.
[53] K. A. Clements and A. S. Costa, “Topology error identification using
normalized Lagrange multipliers,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13,
no. 2, pp. 347–353, 1998.
[54] E. Lourenco, A. J. A. Costa, K. A. Clements, and R. A. Cernev, “A
topology error identification method directly based on collinearity tests,”
IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1920–1929, 2006.
[55] O. Alsaç, N. Vempati, B. Stott, and A. Monticelli, “Generalized state
estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1069–1075,
1998.
[56] A. Gómez Expósito and A. de la Villa Jaén, “Reduced substation models
for generalized state estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 4,
pp. 839–846, 2001.
[57] A. De La Villa Jaén and A. Gómez-Expósito, “Implicitly constrained
substation model for state estimation,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 17,
no. 3, pp. 850–856, 2002.
[58] O. Alsac, B. Stott, and W. F. Tinney, “Sparsity-oriented compensatin
methods for modified network solutions,” IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus
and Syst., vol. PAS-102, no. 5, pp. 1050–1059, May 1983.
[59] W. W. Hager, “Updating the inverse of a matrix,” SIAM Rev., vol. 31,
no. 2, pp. 221–239, June 1989.
[60] R. D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sánchez, , and R. J. Thomas, “MATPOWER: Steady-state operations, planning and analysis tools for power
systems research and education,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1,
pp. 12–19, 2011.
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:1503.02436v2 [math.GR] 15 Mar 2017
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR
TOTALLY DISCONNECTED LOCALLY COMPACT GROUPS
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Abstract. Rational discrete cohomology and homology for a totally disconnected locally compact group G is introduced and studied. The Hom-⊗ identities associated to the rational discrete bimodule Bi(G) allow to introduce the
notion of rational duality groups in analogy to the discrete case. It is shown
that semi-simple groups defined over a non-discrete, non-archimedean local
field are rational t.d.l.c. duality groups, and the same is true for certain topological Kac-Moody groups. However, Y. Neretin’s group of spheromorphisms
of a locally finite regular tree is not even of finite rational discrete cohomological dimension. For a unimodular t.d.l.c. group G of type FP it is possible to
define an Euler-Poincaré characteristic χ(G) which is a rational multiple of a
Haar measure. This value is calculated explicitly for Chevalley groups defined
over a non-discrete, non-archimedean local field K and some other examples.
1. Introduction
For a topological group G several cohomology theories have been introduced
and studied in the past. In many cases the main motivation was to obtain an
interpretation of the low-dimensional cohomology groups in analogy to discrete
groups (cf. [3], [33], [34], [35]).
The main subject of this paper is rational discrete cohomology for totally disconnected, locally compact (= t.d.l.c.) groups. Discrete cohomology can be defined in
a very general frame work. We will call a topological group G to be of type OS, if
(1.1)
Osgrp(G) = { O ⊆ G | O an open subgroup of G }
is a basis of neighbourhoods of 1 in G, e.g., any profinite group is of type OS,
and, by van Dantzig’s theorem (cf. [48]), any t.d.l.c. group is of type OS. For any
topological group G of type OS and any commutative ring R the category R[G] dis
of discrete left R[G]-modules is an abelian category with enough injectives. This
allows to define dExt•R[G] ( , ) as the right derived functors of HomR[G] ( , ), and
dH• (R[G], ) as the right derived functors of the fixed point functor G . Even
in this general context one has a Hochschild-Lyndon-Serre spectral sequence for
short exact sequences of topological groups of type OS (cf. §2.8), and a generalized
Eckmann-Shapiro type lemma in the first argument (cf. §2.9).
In case that G is a t.d.l.c. group it turns out that Q[G] dis is also an abelian
category with enough projectives (cf. Prop. 3.2). Moreover, any projective rational
discrete right Q[G]-module is flat with respect to short exact sequences of rational
Date: March 16, 2017.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 20J05, 22D05, 57T99, 22E20, 51E42, 17B67.
Key words and phrases. Discrete cohomology, totally disconnected locally compact groups,
duality groups, discrete actions on simplicial complexes, E-spaces.
1
2
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
discrete left Q[G]-modules (cf. (4.4)). Thus for a discrete left Q[G]-module M one
may define rational discrete cohomology with coefficients in M by
(1.2)
dHk (G, M ) = dExtkG (Q, M ),
k ≥ 0,
and discrete rational homology with coefficients in M by
(1.3)
dHk (G, M ) = dTorG
k (Q, M ),
k≥0
in analogy to discrete groups (cf. §4).
The rational discrete cohomological dimension cdQ (G) (cf. (3.11)) reflects structural information on a t.d.l.c. group G, e.g.,
(1) G is compact if, and only if, cdQ (G) = 0 (cf. Prop. 3.7(a));
(2) the flat rank of G is bounded by cdQ (G) (cf. Prop. 3.10(b));
(3) if G is acting discretely on a tree with compact stabilizers then cdQ (G) ≤ 1
(cf. Prop. 5.4(b));
(4) more generally, if G is acting discretely on a contractable simplical complex
Σ with compact stabilizers, then cdQ (G) ≤ dim(Σ) (cf. Prop. 6.6(a));
(5) a nested t.d.l.c. group G satisfies cdQ (G) ≤ 1 (cf. Prop. 5.8).
The existence of finitely generated projective rational discrete Q[G]-modules allows
to define the FPk -property, k ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}, (cf. §3.6) in analogy to discrete groups
(cf. [14, §VIII.5]). A t.d.l.c. group G is compactly generated if, and only if, it is of
type FP1 (cf. Thm. 5.3). Using the theory of rough Cayley graphs due to H. Abels
(cf. [1]) and Bass-Serre theory, one may also introduce the notion of a compactly
presented t.d.l.c. groups (cf. §5.8). Such a group must be of type FP2 .
For a t.d.l.c. group G there is not necessarily a group algebra but two natural rational discrete Q[G]-bimodules Bi(G) and Cc (G, Q) and both turn out to be
useful in this context. If G is unimodular, they are isomorphic, but not necessarily canonically isomorphic; if G is not unimodular, they are non-isomorphic (cf.
Prop. 4.11(b)). The Q[G]-bimodule Cc (G, Q) just consists of the continuous functions with compact support from G to the discrete field Q. The rational discrete
left Q[G]-module Bi(G) is defined by
(1.4)
Bi(G) =
lim
−→
Q[G/O],
O∈CO(G)
where CO(G) = { O ∈ Osgrp(G) | O compact } and the direct limit is taken along a
rational multiple of the transfers (cf. (4.15)). It carries naturally also the structure
of a discrete right Q[G]-module.
The rational discrete Q[G]-bimodule Bi(G) can be used to establish Hom-⊗
identities which are well known for discrete groups (cf. §4.3). This allows to define
the notion of a rational t.d.l.c. duality group. In more detail, a t.d.l.c. group G will
be said to be a rational duality group of dimension d ≥ 0, if
(i) G is of type FP∞ ;
(ii) cdQ (G) < ∞;
(iii) dHk (G, Bi(G)) = 0 for k 6= d.
Note that any discrete virtual duality group in the sense of R. Bieri and B. Eckmann
(cf. [9]) of virtual cohomological dimension d ≥ 0 is indeed a rational t.d.l.c.
duality group of dimension d ≥ 0, and the same is true for discrete duality groups
of dimension d over Q (cf. [8, §9.2]). For these t.d.l.c. groups one has a nontrivial relation between discrete cohomology and discrete homology (cf. Prop. 4.10).
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
3
However, it differs slightly from the usual form. A t.d.l.c. group G satisfying (i)
and (ii) will be said to be of type FP. Note that a t.d.l.c. group G satisfying (i),
(ii) and (iii) must also satisfy cdQ (G) = d (cf. Prop. 4.7). The rational discrete
right Q[G]-module
DG = dHd (G, Bi(G))
(1.5)
will be called the rational dualizing module. A compact t.d.l.c. group G is a
rational t.d.l.c. duality group of dimension 0 with dualizing module isomorphic
to the trivial right Q[G]-module Q. If G is a compactly generated t.d.l.c. group
satisfying cdQ (G) = 1, then G is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group of dimension 1.
Provided that G acts discretely on a locally finite tree T with compact stabilizers
one has an isomorphism of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules
(1.6)
×
DG ≃ Hc1 (|T |, Q) ⊗ Q(∆)
(cf. §6.10), where |T | denotes the topological realization1 of T (cf. §A.2), and
Hc1 ( , Q) denotes cohomology with compact support with coefficients in the discrete
field Q. If Σ is a locally finite C-discrete simplicial G-complex (cf. §6.4), then
Hck (|Σ|, Q) carries naturally the structure of a rational discrete left Q[G]-module
(cf. §A.4). Here Q(∆) denotes the 1-dimensional rational discrete left Q[G]-module
which action is given by the modular function2 ∆ : G → Q+ of G (cf. Remark 4.13).
For a right Q[G]-module M we denote by × M the associated left Q[G]-module, i.e.,
for m ∈ M and g ∈ G one has g · m = m · g −1 .
Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. The family of compact open subgroups C of G is closed
under conjugation and finite intersections. Hence there exists a G-classifying space
E C (G) for the family C (cf. [32, §2], [47, Chap. 1, Thm. 6.6]) which is unique up
to G-homotopy equivalence. E.g., if Π = π1 (A, Λ, x0 ) is the fundamental group of
a graph of profinite groups, then the tree T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + ) arising in Bass-Serre
theory (cf. [41, §I.5.1, Thm. 12]) is an E C (Π)-space (cf. §6.10). For algebraic
groups defined over a non-discrete non-archimedean t.d.l.c. field K a celebrated
theorem of A. Borel and J-P. Serre yields the following (cf. §6.11).
Theorem A. Let G be a simply-connected semi-simple algebraic group defined over
a non-discrete non-archimedian local field K, let (C, S) be the affine building associated to G, and let |Σ(C, S)| denote the topological realization of the Bruhat-Tits
realization of (C, S). Then G(K) is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group of dimension
d = rk(G) = dim(Σ(C, S)), and
(1.7)
×
DG(K) ≃ Hcd (|Σ(C, S)|, Q).
Moreover, |Σ(C, S)| is an E C (G(K))-space.
Here rk(G) denotes the rank of G as algebraic group defined over K, i.e., rk(G)
coincides with the rank of a maximal split torus of G. As already mentioned in [12]
one may think of × DG(K) as a generalized Steinberg module of G(K).
Another source of rational t.d.l.c. duality groups arises in the context of topological Kac-Moody groups as introduced by B. Rémy and M. Ronan in [40, §1B].
In principal, these t.d.l.c. groups behave very similarly as the examples described
1Although this topological space is also known as the realization of the tree T (cf. [41, §I.2,
p. 14]), we have chosen this name in order to avoid the linguistic ambiguity with the geometric
realization of buildings.
2Throughout this paper Haar measures are considered to be left invariant.
4
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
in Theorem B, but there are also quite notable differences. Any split Kac-Moody
group G(F) defined over a finite field F has an action on the positive part Ξ+ of the
associated twin building. Assuming that the associated Weyl group (W, S) is infinite
one defines Ḡ(F) as the permutation closure of G(F) on its action on the chambers
of Ξ+ . Then Ḡ(F) acts also on Σ(Ξ+ ), the Davis-Moussang realization of Ξ+ ,
which is a finite dimensional locally finite simplicial complex. The subgroup Ḡ(F)◦
of Ḡ(F), which is the closure of the image of the type preserving automorphisms of
Ξ, is of finite index in Ḡ(F). This group has the following properties.
Theorem B. Let F be a finite field, let Ḡ(F) be a topological Kac-Moody group
obtained by completing the split Kac-Moody group G(F), and let (W, S) denote its
associated Weyl group.
(a) Then Σ(Ξ) is a tame C-discrete simplicial Ḡ(F)◦ -complex, and |Σ(Ξ)| is an
E C (Ḡ(F)◦ )-space.
(b) cdQ (Ḡ◦ (F)) = cdQ (Ḡ(F)) = cdQ (W ).
(c) For d = cdQ (Ḡ◦ (F)) one has × DḠ(F)◦ ≃ Hcd (|Σ(Ξ)|, Q).
(d) Ḡ(F)◦ (and hence Ḡ(F)) is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group if, and only if,
W is a rational duality group.
One may verify easily that whenever W is a hyperbolic Coxeter group, the topological Kac-Moody group Ḡ(F)◦ is indeed a rational t.d.l.c. duality group (cf. Remark 6.12). However, one may also construct examples of topological Kac-Moody
groups which are not rational t.d.l.c. duality groups (cf. Remark 6.13).
We close our investigations with a short discussion of the Euler-Poincaré characteristic χ(G) one may define for a unimodular t.d.l.c. group G of type FP. The
value χ(G) is a rational multiple of a left invariant Haar measure µO , µO (O) = 1,
for some compact open subgroup O of G. Indeed, for a discrete group Π of type
FP it is straightforward to verify that χ(Π) = χΠ · µ{1} , where χΠ denotes the
classical Euler-Poincaré characteristic (cf. [14, §XI.7]). Although we present some
explicit calculations in section 7.2, we are still very far away from understanding
the generic behaviour of the Euler-Poincaré characteristic. We conjecture that a
unimodular compactly generated t.d.l.c. group G satisfying cdQ (G) = 1 should
have non-positive Euler-Poincaré characteristic (cf. Question 6). An affirmative
answer to this question would resolve the accessibility problem, and thus would
yield a complete description of unimodular compactly generated t.d.l.c. groups of
rational discrete cohomological dimension 1.
Acknowledgements: Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5 are part of the first author’s PhD
thesis (cf. [20]). The authors would like to thank M. Bridson for some helpful
discussions concerning CAT(0)-spaces.
2. Discrete cohomology
2.1. Topological groups of type OS. Let G be a topological group of type OS.
If H is a closed subgroup of G, then { O ∩ H | O ∈ Osgrp(G) } is a basis of
neighbourhood of 1 in H. Hence H is also of type OS. Moreover, if π : G → Ḡ is
a continuous, open, surjective homomorphism of topological groups, then { π(O) |
O ∈ Osgrp(G) } is a basis of neighbourhoods of 1 in Ḡ. Thus Ḡ is also of type OS.
Finally, if G is homeomorphic to an open subgroup of a topological group Y , then
Y is of type OS as well.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
5
Any compact totally-disconnected topological group is profinite and therefore,
by definition, of type OS (cf. [42, Prop. 1.1.0]). By van Dantzig’s theorem (cf. [48]),
every t.d.l.c. group contains a compact open subgroup. Hence from the previously
mentioned properties one conlcudes the following.
Fact 2.1. Any totally-disconnected locally-compact group is of type OS.
2.2. Discrete modules of topological groups of type OS. Let R be a commutative ring with 1 ∈ R. For a group G we denote by R[G] its R-group algebra,
and by R[G] mod the abelian category of left R[G]-modules. Let G be a topological
group of type OS. For M ∈ ob(R[G] mod) the subset
(2.1)
d(M ) = { m ∈ M | stabG (m) open in G },
where stabG (m) = { g ∈ G | g · m = m }, is an R[G]-submodule of M , the largest
discrete R[G]-submodule of M . Here we call a left R[G]-module B discrete, if the
map · : G × B → B is continuous, where B carries the discrete topology. If
φ : B → M is a morphism of left R[G]-modules and B is discrete, one concludes
that im(φ) ⊆ d(M ). This has the following consequences (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]).
Fact 2.2. Let G be a topological group of type OS, and let R[G] dis denote the full
subcategory of R[G] mod the objects of which are discrete left R[G]-modules. Then
(a) R[G] dis is an abelian category;
(b) d : R[G] mod → R[G] dis is a covariant additive left exact functor, which is
the right-adjoint of the forgetful functor f : R[G] dis → R[G] mod;
(c) d is mapping injectives to injectives;
(d) R[G] dis has enough injectives.
The abelian category R[G] mod admits minimal injective envelopes, i.e., for M ∈
ob(R[G] mod) the maximal essential extension iM : M → I(M ) is a minimal injective
envelope (cf. [31, §III.11]). Thus, if M ∈ ob(R[G] dis), then d(iM ) : M → d(I(M ))
is a minimal injective envelope in R[G] dis. This has the following consequence.
Fact 2.3. The abelian category
R[G] dis
admits minimal injective resolutions.
If M and N are left R[G]-modules, then M ⊗ N = M ⊗R N is again a left
R[G]-module. Moreover, if G is a topological group of type OS and M and N are
discrete left R[G]-modules, then M ⊗ N is discrete as well.
2.3. Closed subgroups. Let H be a closed subgroup of the topological group G
of type OS. Then one has a restriction functor
(2.2)
resG
H( ):
R[G] dis
−→ R[H] dis
which is exact. The discrete coinduction functor
(2.3)
G
dcoindG
H ( ) = d ◦ coindH ( ) :
R[H] dis
−→ R[G] dis
where coindG
H (M ) = HomR[H] (R[G], M ), M ∈ ob(R[H] mod), is the coinduction
functor, is left exact. It is the right-adjoint of the restriction functor. In particular,
dcoindG
H ( ) is mapping injectives to injectives (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]).
Let N be a closed normal subgroup of the topological group G of type OS. The
canonical projection π : G → Ḡ, where Ḡ = G/N , is surjective, continuous and
open. One has an inflation functor
(2.4)
inf G
Ḡ ( ) :
R[Ḡ] dis
−→ R[G] dis
6
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
which is exact. The inflation functor is left-adjoint to the N -fixed point functor
(2.5)
N
:
R[G] dis
−→ R[Ḡ] dis
which is left exact. In particular, one has the following (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]).
Fact 2.4. Let G be a topological group of type OS, and let N be a closed normal
subgroup of G. Then the N -fixed point functor N : R[G] dis −→ R[Ḡ] dis, Ḡ = G/N ,
is mapping injectives to injectives.
2.4. Open subgroups. Let H ⊆ G be an open subgroup
P of the topological group
G of type OS, and let M ∈ ob(R[H] dis). Then for y = 1≤i≤n ri gi ⊗mi ∈ indG
H (M )
T
one has 1≤i≤n g stabH (mi ) ⊆ stabG (y). In particular, M is a discrete left R[G]module, and one has an exact induction functor
(2.6)
indG
H( ):
R[H] dis
−→ R[G] dis.
which is the left adjoint of the restriction functor resG
H ( ). Hence one has the
following (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]).
Fact 2.5. Let H ⊆ G be an open subgroup of the topological group G of type OS.
Then resG
H ( ) is mapping injectives to injectives.
2.5. Discrete cohomology. Let G be a topological group of type OS. For M ∈
ob(R[G] dis) we denote by
(2.7)
dExtkR[G] (M, ) = Rk HomR[G] dis (M, )
the right derived functors of HomR[G] (M, ) in
bifunctors
(2.8)
dExtkR[G] ( , ) :
op
R[G] dis
R[G] dis.
The contra-/covariant
× R[G] dis −→ R mod,
k ≥ 0, admit long exact sequences in the first and in the second argument. Moreover, dExt0R[G] (M, ) ≃ HomR[G] (M, ), and dExtkR[G] (M, I) = 0 for every injective, discrete left R[G]-module I. We define the k th discrete cohomology group of
G with coefficients in R[G] dis by
(2.9)
dHk (R[G], ) = dExtkR[G] (R, ),
k ≥ 0,
where R denotes the trivial left R[G]-module.
Example 2.6. Let R = Z.
(a) If G is a discrete group, G is of type OS and Z[G] dis = Z[G] mod. In particular,
dH• (Z[G], ) = H • (G, ) coincides with ordinary group cohomology (cf. [14]).
(b) If G is a profinite group, G is of type OS and Z[G] dis coincides with the abelian
category of discrete G-modules. Thus dH• (Z[G], ) = H • (G, ) coincides with the
Galois cohomology groups discussed in [42].
2.6. The restriction functor. Let H ⊆ G be a closed subgroup of the topological
group G of type OS, and let M ∈ ob(R[G] dis). Let (I • , ∂ • , µG ) be an injective
resolution of M in ob(R[G] dis), and let (J • , δ • , µH ) be an injective resolution of
resG
H (M ) in R[H] dis. By the comparison theorem in homological algebra, one has a
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
7
•
•
morphism of cochain complexes of left R[H]-modules φ• : resG
H (I ) → J such that
the diagram
(2.10)
resG
H (M )
µG
/ resG (I 0 )
H
∂0
/ resG (I 1 )
H
φ0
resG
H (M )
/ J0
µH
∂1
/ resG (I 2 )
H
φ1
δ
0
/ J1
∂2
/ ...
φ2
δ
/ J2
1
δ2
/ ...
commutes. Moreover, φ• is unique up to chain homotopy equivalence with respect
to this property. Let
φ̃k : (I k )G
(2.11)
/ (I k )H
(φk )H
/ (J k )H .
Then φ̃• : ((I • )G , ∂˜• ) → (J • )H , δ̃ • ) is a mapping of cochain complexes of R-modules.
Applying the cohomology functor yields a mapping of cohomological functors
(2.12)
res•G,H (M ) : dH• (R[G], M ) −→ dH• (R[H], resG
H (M )).
The map res•G,H ( ) will be called the restriction functor in discrete cohomology.
2.7. The inflation functor. Let N be a closed normal subgroup of the topological
group of type OS, and let π : G → Ḡ, Ḡ = G/N , denote the canonical projection.
Let M ∈ ob(R[Ḡ] dis), and let (I • , ∂ • , µḠ ) be an injective resolution of M in R[Ḡ] dis.
Let (J • , δ • , µG ) be an injective resolution of inf G
Ḡ (M ) in R[G] dis. By the comparison
theorem in homological algebra, one has a mapping of cochain complexes of left
•
•
R[G]-modules φ• : inf G
Ḡ (I ) → J which is unique up to chain homotopy equivalence
such that the diagram
(2.13)
inf G
Ḡ (M )
inf G
(µḠ )
Ḡ
/ inf G (I 0 )
Ḡ
∂0
φ0
inf G
Ḡ (M )
µG
/ J0
/ inf G (I 1 )
Ḡ
φ1
δ0
/ J1
commutes. Applying first the fixed point functor
functor one obtains a functor
(2.14)
∂1
/ inf G (I 2 )
Ḡ
∂2
/ ...
φ2
δ1
G
/ J2
δ2
/ ...
and then the cohomology
inf •Ḡ,G (M ) : dH• (R[Ḡ], M ) −→ dH• (R[G], inf G
Ḡ (M )),
which will be called the inflation functor in discrete cohomology.
2.8. The Hochschild - Lyndon - Serre spectral sequence. Let N be a closed
normal subgroup of the topological group G of type OS, and let π : G → Ḡ, Ḡ =
G/N , denote the canonical projection. The functor G : R[G] dis −→ R mod can be
decomposed by G = ( Ḡ ) ◦ ( N ). Moreover, N : R[G] dis −→ R[Ḡ] dis is mapping
injectives to injectives (cf. Fact 2.4). Thus for M ∈ ob(R[G] dis) the Grothendieck
spectral sequence (cf. [49, Thm. 5.8.3]) yields a Hochschild-Lyndon-Serre spectral
sequence
(2.15)
s+t
E2s,t (M ) = dHs (R[Ḡ], dHt (R[N ], resG
(R[G], M )
N (M ))) =⇒ dH
8
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
of cohomological type concentrated in the first quadrant which is functorial in M .
The edge homomorphisms are given by
esh : dHs (R[Ḡ], M N )
(2.16)
inf sḠ,G (M N )
0,t
etv : E∞
(M )
/ E s,0 (M )
2
/ E 0,t (M )
2
restG,N (M)N
s,0
/ E∞
(M ),
/ dHt (R[N ], M )G/N ,
and one has a 5-term exact sequence
(2.17)
0
/ dH1 (R[Ḡ], M N )
e1h
/ dH1 (R[G], M )
e1v
/ dH1 (R[N ], M )G/N
d0,1
2
dH2 (R[G], M ) o
e2h
dH2 (R[Ḡ], M N )
2.9. An Eckmann-Shapiro type lemma. Let H be an open subgroup of the
topological group G of type OS, and let M ∈ ob(R[G] dis). Let (I • , ∂ • , µG ) be
•
G
•
G
an injective resolution of M in R[G] dis. Then (resG
H (I ), resH (∂ ), resH (µG )) is an
G
injective resolution of resH (M ) in R[H] dis (cf. Fact 2.5). For B ∈ ob(R[H] dis) one
has natural isomorphisms
k
G k
HomR[G] (indG
H (B), I ) ≃ HomR[H] (B, resH (I ))
(2.18)
k ≥ 0, which yield isomorphisms
k
G
dExtkR[G] (indG
H (B), M ) ≃ dExtR[H] (B, resH (M )),
(2.19)
k ≥ 0. In particular, for B = R one obtains natural isomorphisms
k
εk : dExtkR[G] (indG
H (R), ) −→ dH (R[H], )
(2.20)
such that
(2.21)
dExt•R[G] (indG
H (R), )
❚❚❚❚
❧5
❧
❧
❚❚❚ε❚•
❧❧❧
❧
❚❚❚❚
❧
❧
❧
❚❚❚)
❧
•
❧❧❧
resG,H ( )
•
/
dExtR[G] (R, )
dH• (R[H], resG
H ( ))
dExt•
R[G] (ε)
is a commutative diagram of cohomological functors with values in
ε : indG
H (R) → R is the canonical map.
R[G] dis,
where
3. Rational discrete cohomology for t.d.l.c. groups
Throughout this section we will assume that G is a t.d.l.c. group. Furthermore,
we choose R = Q to be the field of rational numbers. From now on we will omit the
appearance of the field Q in the notation, i.e., we put dH• (G, ) = dH• (Q[G], ),
dExt•Q[G] ( , ) = dExt•G ( , ), etc.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
9
3.1. Profinite groups. It is well known that a t.d.l.c. group is compact if, and
only if, it is profinite (cf. [42, Prop. 1.1.0]). The main goal of this subsection is to
establish the following property which will turn out to be essential for our purpose.
Proposition 3.1. Let G be a profinite group. Then every discrete left Q[G]-module
M is injective and projective in Q[G] dis.
Proof. The proposition is a consequence of several facts.
Claim 3.1.1. One has dHk (G, M ) = 0 for every M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) and k ≥ 1. In
particular, every finite dimensional discrete left Q[G]-module is projective.
Proof of Claim 3.1.1. By [42, §2.2, Prop. 8], one has
(3.1)
dHk (G, M ) = limU⊳ G dHk (G/U, M U ),
−→ ◦
where the projective limit is running over all open normal subgroups U of G.
By Maschke’s theorem, one has dHk (G/U, M U ) = 0 for k ≥ 1, and thus, by
(3.1), dHk (G, M ) = 0 for all k ≥ 1. Let U be an open subgroup of G. Since
dExt1U (Q, ) = 0, HomU (Q, ) : Q[U] dis → Q mod is an exact functor. In particuG
lar, Q ∈ ob(Q[U] dis) is projective. Thus, as resG
U ( ) is exact, Q[G/U ] ≃ indU (Q) is
projective for every open subgroup U of G (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]). By Maschke’s
theorem, every finite dimensional discrete left Q[G]-module is a direct summand of
Q[G/U ] for some open subgroup U of G. This yields the claim.
As a consequence one obtains the following.
Claim 3.1.2. Let S ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) be irreducible, and let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). Then
dExtkG (S, M ) = 0 for all k ≥ 1.
Proof of Claim 3.1.2. Note that every irreducible discrete left Q[G]-module S is of
finite dimension, and therefore projective (cf. Claim 3.1.1).
For a discrete left Q[G]-module M we denote by soc(M ) ⊆ M the socle of M ,
i.e., soc(M ) is the sum of all irreducible left Q[G]-submodules of M . Moreover, as
m ∈ M is contained in the finite dimensional discrete left Q[G]-module Q[G] · m,
one has that soc(M ) = 0 if, and only if, M = 0.
Claim 3.1.3. Every discrete left Q[G]-module M is injective in ob(Q[G] dis).
Proof of Claim 3.1.3. Let (I • , δ • ) be a minimal injective resolution of M in Q[G] dis
(cf. Fact 2.3). By Claim 3.1.2, for any irreducible S ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) one has for
k ≥ 1 that 0 = dExtkG (S, M ) = HomG (S, I k ) (cf. [6, Cor. 2.5.4(ii)]). In particular,
soc(I k ) = 0, and therefore I k = 0. Hence M is injective.
Claim 3.1.4. The category
Q[G] dis
has enough projectives.
Proof of Claim 3.1.4. Let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). By definition, for m ∈ M the left Q[G]submodule Q[G] · m ⊆ M is finite dimensional and discrete.
Thus, by Claim 3.1.1,
`
Q[G] · m is projective in Q[G] dis, and therefore, P = m∈M Q[G] · m is projective in
Q[G] dis. The canonical map π : P → M is surjective, and this yields the claim.
Claim 3.1.5. Every discrete left Q[G]-module is projective in
Q[G] dis.
10
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proof of Claim 3.1.5. Let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). By Claim 3.1.4, there exist a projective
discrete left Q[G]-module P and a map π : P → M such that
(3.2)
0
/ ker(π)
/P
π
/M
/0
is a short exact sequence in Q[G] dis. By Claim 3.1.3, ker(π) is injective. Hence (3.2)
splits, and M is isomorphic to a direct summand of P , i.e., M is projective.
3.2. Discrete permutation modules. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. A left G-set Ω is
said to be discrete, if stabG (ω) is an open subgroup of G for any ω ∈ Ω. In this case
· : G × Ω → Ω is continuous, where Ω is considered to be a discrete topological
space and G × Ω carries the product topology. We say that Ω is a discrete left
G-set with compact stabilizers, if stabG (ω) is a compact and open subgroup for any
ω ∈ Ω.
Let Ω be a left G-set. Then Q[Ω] - the free Q-vector space over the set Ω carries canonically the structure of left Q[G]-module. Moreover, Ω is a discrete left
G-set if, and only if, Q[Ω] is a discrete left Q[G]-module. For a discrete left G-set
Ω, Q[Ω] is also called a discrete left Q[G]-permutation module. Additionally, one
has the following property.
Proposition 3.2. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let Ω be a discrete left G-set with
compact stabilizers. Then Q[Ω] is projective in Q[G] dis. In particular, the abelian
category Q[G] dis has enough projectives.
F
Proof.
Let Ω = i∈I Ωi be the decomposition of Ω into G-orbits. Since Q[Ω] =
`
i∈I Q[Ωi ] and as the coproduct of projective objects remains projective, it suffices
to prove the claim for transitive discrete left G-sets Ω with compact stabilizers, i.e.,
we may assume that for ω ∈ Ω one has an isomorphism of left G-sets Ω ≃ G/O, and
an isomorphism of left Q[G]-modules Q[Ω] ≃ indG
O (Q), where O = stabG (ω). The
induction functor is left adjoint to the restriction functor which is exact. Since the
trivial left Q[O]-module is projective in Q[O] dis (cf. Prop. 3.1), and as indG
O ( ) is
mapping projectives to projectives (cf. §2.4 and [49, Prop. 2.3.10]), one concludes
that Q[Ω] is projective.
Let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). For each element m in M let Om be a compact open
subgroup of stabG (m). Then πm : indG
Om (Q) → M given by πm (g ⊗ 1) = g · m is a
mapping of left Q[G]-modules. It is straightforward to verify that
`
`
(3.3)
π = m∈M πm : m∈M indG
Om (Q) −→ M
`
is F
a surjective mapping of discrete left Q[G]-modules, and m∈M indG
Om (Q) ≃
Q[ m∈M G/Om ] is projective.
It is somehow astonishing that for a t.d.l.c. group G, the category Q[G] dis is
a full subcategory of Q[G] mod with enough projectives and enough injectives (cf.
Fact 2.2), but the reader may have noticed that this is a direct consequence of
Proposition 3.1.
Corollary 3.3. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. A discrete left Q[G]-module M is projective if, and only if, it is a direct summand of a discrete left Q[G]-permutation
module Q[Ω] for some discrete left G-set Ω with compact stabilizers.
From Proposition 3.2 and Corollary 3.3 one deduces the following properties.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
11
Proposition 3.4. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group and, let H ⊆ G be a closed subgroup
of G. Then resG
H : Q[G] dis → Q[H] dis is mapping projectives to projectives. Moreover, if H is open in G, then indG
H : Q[H] dis → Q[G] dis is mapping projectives to
projectives.
Proof. By Corollary 3.3, it suffices to prove that resG
H (Q[Ω]) is projective for any
discrete left Q[G]-permutation with compact stabilizers. Since resG
H ( ) commutes
with coproducts, we may also assume that Ω is a transitive discrete left G-set with
compact stabilizers, i.e., for ω ∈ Ω and O = stabG (ω) one has Ω ≃ G/O.FLet R ⊆ G
be a set of representatives of the (H, O)-double cosets in G, i.e., G = r∈R H r O.
Then
`
r
(3.4)
resG
H (Q[G/O]) ≃
r∈R Q[H/(H ∩ O)].
Since H is closed and O compact and open, H ∩ r O is compact and open in H.
Hence, by Proposition 3.2, resG
H (Q[G/O]) is a projective discrete left Q[H]-module.
Assume that H is open in G. Since indG
H ( ) : Q[H] dis → Q[G] dis is the left adjoint
G
of the exact functor resG
(
)
:
dis
→
Q[G]
Q[H] dis, indH ( ) is mapping projectives
H
to projectives (cf. [49, Prop. 2.3.10]).
We close this subsection with the following characterization of compact t.d.l.c.
groups.
Proposition 3.5. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let O be a compact open subgroup
of G. Then HomG (Q, Q[G/O]) 6= 0 if, and only if, G is compact. Moreover, if G
is compact, then HomG (Q, Q[G/O]) ≃ Q.
Proof. If G is not compact, then |G : O| = ∞. Hence HomG (Q, Q[G/O]) = 0
(cf. [14, §III.5, Ex. 4]). If G is compact, then |G : O| < ∞, and Q[G/O] coincides with the coinduced module coindG
O (Q) (cf. [14, §III, Prop. 5.9]). Hence
HomG (Q, Q[G/O]) ≃ HomO (Q, Q) ≃ Q. This yields the claim.
3.3. Signed rational discrete permutation modules. For some application it
will be useful to consider signed discrete permutation modules. Let (Ω, ¯ , ·) be a
signed discrete left G-set, i.e., (Ω, ¯) is a signed set (cf. §A.5), and (Ω, ·) is a left
G-set satisfying
g · ω = g · ω̄,
(3.5)
for all g ∈ G and ω ∈ Ω. Then (cf. (A.16))
(3.6)
Q[Ω] = Q[Ω]/spanQ { ω + ω̄ | ω ∈ Ω }
is a discreteF
left Q[G]-module. For ω ∈ Ω let ω denote its canonical image in Q[Ω].
Let Ω = j∈J Ωr be a decomposition of Ω in G × C2 -orbits, where C2 = Z/2Z
and σ = 1 + 2Z ∈ C2 acts by application of ¯ . We say that G acts without inversion
on Ωj , if g · ω 6= ω for all g ∈ G and ω ∈ Ωj , otherwise we say that G acts with
inversion. In this case, there exists g ∈ G and ω ∈ Ωj such that g ·ω = ω̄. Moreover,
the action of G±ω = stabG ({ω, ω̄}) on Q · ω ⊆ Q[Ω] is given by a sign character
sgnω : G±ω −→ {±1}.
(3.7)
Moreover, by choosing representatives of the G × C2 -orbits, one obtains an isomorphism of discrete left Q[G]-modules
a
a
(3.8)
Q[Ω] ≃
indG
indG
G±ω (Q(sgnω )) ⊕
G̟ (Q)).
ω∈Rw
̟∈Rwo
12
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Note that by the ± -construction (cf. §A.5) any rational discrete permutation
module Q[Ω] can be considered as the signed rational discrete permutation module
Q[Ω± ].
3.4. The rational discrete cohomological dimension. Let M be a discrete left
Q[G]-module for a t.d.l.c. group G. Then M is said to have projective dimension
less or equal to n ≤ ∞, if M admits a projective resolution (P• , ∂• , ε) in Q[G] dis
satisfying Pk = 0 for k > n, i.e., the sequence
(3.9)
/ Pn
0
∂n
∂n−1
/ Pn−1
/ ...
∂2
/ P1
∂1
/ P0
ε
/M
/0
is exact. The projective dimension projQ dim(M ) ∈ N0 ∪ {∞} of M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis)
is defined to be the minimum of such n ≤ ∞. As in the discrete case one has the
following property.
Lemma 3.6. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let M be a discrete left Q[G]-module.
Then the following are equivalent.
(i) projQ dim(M ) ≤ n;
(ii) dExti (M, ) = 0 for all i > n;
(iii) dExtn+1 (M, ) = 0;
(iv) In any exact sequence
(3.10)
0
in
/K
Q[G] dis
/ Pn−1
∂n−1
/ ...
∂2
/ P1
∂1
/ P0
ε
/M
/0
with Pi , 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1, projective, one has that K is projective.
Proof. The proof of [14, Chap. VIII, Lemma 2.1] can be transferred verbatim.
For a t.d.l.c. group G
(3.11)
cdQ (G) = projQ dim(Q)
will be called the rational discrete cohomological dimension of G, i.e., one has
cdQ (G) =projQ dim(Q)
(3.12)
= min({ n ∈ N0 | dHi (G, ) = 0 for all i > n } ∪ {∞})
= sup{ n ∈ N0 | dHn (G, M ) 6= 0 for some M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) }.
Proposition 3.7. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
(a) One has cdQ (G) = 0 if, and only if, G is compact.
(b) If N is a closed normal subgroup of G, then
(3.13)
cdQ (G) ≤ cdQ (N ) + cdQ (G/N ).
(c) If H is a closed subgroup of G, then
(3.14)
cdQ (H) ≤ cdQ (G).
In particular, if H is normal and co-compact, then equality holds in (3.14).
Proof. (a) If G is compact, then G is profinite, and thus, by Proposition 3.1,
cdQ (G) = projQ dim(Q) = 0. Suppose that G satisfies cdQ (G) = 0, i.e., Q ∈
ob(Q[G] dis) is projective. By van Dantzig’s theorem, there exists a compact open
subgroup O of G. By hypothesis, the canonical projection ε : Q[G/O] → Q admits a section. In particular, HomG (Q, Q[G/O]) 6= 0. Hence one concludes that
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
13
|G : O| < ∞, and G is compact. (b) is a direct consequence of the HochschildLyndon-Serre spectral sequence (cf. (2.15)) and (3.12). (c) By Proposition 3.4, the
restriction of a projection resultion of Q in Q[G] dis is a projective resolution of Q in
Q[H] dis showing the inequality (3.14). The final remark is a consequence of (3.13),
(3.14) and part (a).
Remark 3.8. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let H ⊆ G be such that |G : H| < ∞.
One concludes from Proposition 3.7(c) that cdQ (H) = cdQ (G). However, the following question will remain unanswered in this paper.
Question 1. Suppose that H is a closed co-compact subgroup of the t.d.l.c. group
G. Is it true that cdQ (H) = cdQ (G)?
Remark 3.9. Proposition 3.7(c) implies that for any discrete group D of a t.d.l.c.
group G one has
(3.15)
cdQ (D) ≤ cdQ (G).
3.5. The flat rank of a t.d.l.c. group. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let H
be a closed subgroup of G. Then H is called a flat subgroup of G, if there exists
a compact open subgroup O of G which is tidy for all h ∈ H (cf. [5, §2, Def. 1]).
For such a subgroup H(1) = { h ∈ H | s(h) = 1 } is a normal subgroup, and
H/H(1) is a free abelian group over some set IH (cf. [51, Cor. 6.15]). Moreover,
rk(H) = card(IH ) ∈ N ∪ {∞} is called the rank of the flat subgroup H. The flat
rank frk(G) of G is defined by
(3.16)
frk(G) = sup({ rk(H) | H a flat subgroup of G } ∪ {0}) ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}
(cf. [4, §1.3]). We call the t.d.l.c. group G to be N -compact, if for any compact
open subgroup O of G, the open subgroup NG (O) is also compact. One has the
following property.
Proposition 3.10. Let G be an N -compact t.d.l.c. group.
(a) Let H be a flat subgroup of G. Then rk(H) = cdQ (H).
(b) frk(G) ≤ cdQ (G).
Proof. (a) For any abelian group A which is a free over a set IA one has
(3.17)
cdQ (A) = cdZ (A) = card(IA ) ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}.
Let O be a compact open subgroup such that O is tidy for all h ∈ H. By hypothesis, NG (O) is compact, and therefore C = H ∩ NG (O) is compact. Then, by
Proposition 3.7(a) and the Hochschild-Lyndon-Serre spectral sequence (cf. (2.15)),
one has natural isomorphisms dHk (H, ) ≃ dHk (H/C, C ) for all k > 0. Hence,
by (3.17), cdQ (H) = cdQ (H/C) = rk(H). (b) is a direct consequence of (a).
Remark 3.11. (Neretin’s group of spheromorphisms) Let Td+1 be a d+1-regular tree,
and let G = Hier◦ (Td+1 ) = Nd+1,d be the group of all almost automorphisms (or
spheromorphisms) of Td+1 introduced by Y. Neretin in [37]. It is well known that G
is a compactly generated simple (in particular topologically simple) t.d.l.c. group.
The group G contains a discrete subgroup D which is isomorphic to the HigmanThompson group Fd+1,d . From this fact one concludes that G contains discrete
subgroups isomorphic to Zn for all n ≥ 1. Hence, by Remark 3.9, cdQ (G) = ∞.
14
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
3.6. Totally disconnected locally compact groups of type FP∞ . Let G be
a t.d.l.c. group, and let M be a discrete left Q[G]-module. Then M is said to be
finitely generated, if there exist
` compact open subgroups O1 , . . . , On of G and a
surjective homomorphism π : 1≤j≤n Q[G/Oj ] → M . A partial projective resolution
(3.18)
Pn
∂n
/ Pn−1
∂n−1
/ ...
∂2
/ P1
∂1
ε
/ P0
/M
/0
of M will be called to be of finite type, if Pj is finitely generated for all 0 ≤ j ≤ n.
One has the following property.
Proposition 3.12. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let M be a discrete left Q[G]module. Then the following are equivalent:
(i) There is a partial projective resolution (Pj , ∂j , ε)0≤j≤n of finite type of M
in Q[G] dis;
(ii) the discrete left Q[G]-module M is finitely generated and for every partial
projective resolution of finite type
(3.19)
Qk
in
Q[G] dis
ðk
/ Qk−1
ðk−1
/ ...
ð2
/ Q1
ð1
/ Q0
ε′
/M
/0
with k < n, ker(ðk ) is finitely generated.
Proof. The proposition is a direct consequence of generalized form of Schanuel’s
lemma (cf. [14, Chap. VIII, Lemma 4.2 and Prop. 4.3]).
The discrete left Q[G]-module M will be said to be of type FPn , n ≥ 0, if M
satisfies either of the hypothesis (i) or (ii) in Proposition 3.12, i.e., M is of type
FP0 if, and only if, M is finitely generated. If M is of type FPn for all n ≥ 0, then
M will be said to be of type FP∞ . The t.d.l.c. group G will be called to be of type
FPn , n ∈ N ∪ {∞}, if the trivial left Q[G]-module Q is of type FPn .
4. Rational discrete homology for t.d.l.c. groups
β
α
For a profinite group O any short exact sequence 0 → L → M → N → 0 of
discrete left Q[O]-modules splits (cf. Prop. 3.1). Hence, if Q ∈ ob(disQ[O] ) denotes
the trivial right Q[O]-module, the sequence
(4.1)
0
/ Q ⊗O L
idQ ⊗α
/ Q ⊗O M
idQ ⊗β
/ Q ⊗O N
/0
is exact. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let O ⊆ G be a compact open subgroup, and
β
α
let 0 → L → M → N → 0 be a short exact sequence of discrete left Q[G]-modules.
Since indG
O ( ) : disQ[O] → disQ[G] is an exact functor, and as
indG
O (Q) ⊗G
(4.2)
≃ Q ⊗O resG
O( ) :
Q[G] dis
−→ Q mod
are naturally isomorphic additive functors, the sequence
(4.3) 0
/ indG
O (Q) ⊗G L
id⊗α
/ indG
O (Q) ⊗G M
id⊗β
/ indG
O (Q) ⊗G N
/0
: Q[G] dis → Q mod is an exact functor. Moreover, as
is exact, i.e., indG
O (Q) ⊗G
⊗G commutes with direct limits in the first and in the second argument (cf.
[14, §VIII.4, p. 195]), the sequence
(4.4)
0
/ Q ⊗G L
idQ ⊗α
/ Q ⊗G M
idQ ⊗β
/ Q ⊗G N
/0
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
15
is exact for any projective discrete right Q[G]-module Q (cf. Cor. 3.3), i.e., Q is
flat. For a discrete right Q[G]-module C, we denote by
dTorG
k (C, ) :
(4.5)
Q[G] dis
−→ Q mod
the left derived functors of the right exact functor C ⊗G
define the rational discrete homology of G by
:
Q[G] dis
→ Q mod, and
dHk (G, ) = dTorG
k (Q, ).
(4.6)
By definition, one has the following properties.
Proposition 4.1. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let C be a discrete right Q[G]-module,
and let M be a discrete left Q[G]-module. Then
(a) dHk (G, M ) = 0 for all k > cdQ (G);
(b) if P ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) is projective, one has dTorG
k (C, P ) = 0 for all k ≥ 1;
(c) if G is compact, one has dTorG
(C,
M
)
=
0
for
all k ≥ 1.
k
Proof. (a) is a direct consequence of the definition of cdQ (G) (cf. (3.11)). (b) Using
the previously mentioned arguments one concludes that ⊗G P : disQ[G] → Q mod
is an exact functor. This property implies that for the left derived functors LM
k of
G
M
P
⊗G M one has that dTork (C, M ) ≃ Lk (C). Since P is projective, Lk = 0 for
all k > 1. This yields the claim. (c) is a direct consequence of Proposition 3.1.
4.1. Invariants and coinvariants. Let O be a profinite group, and let M be a
discrete left Q[O]-module. The Q-vector space
M O = { m ∈ M | g · m = m for all g ∈ O } ⊆ M
(4.7)
is called the space of O-invariants of M , and
MO = Q ⊗O M,
(4.8)
is called the space of O-coinvariants of M . By definition, one has a canonical map
φM,O : M O −→ MO
(4.9)
given by φM,O (m) = 1 ⊗O m for m ∈ M . One has the following.
Proposition 4.2. Let O be a profinite group, and let M be a discrete left Q[O]module. Then φM,O is an isomorphism. Moreover, if U ⊆ O is an open subgroup,
one has commutative diagrams
MO
(4.10)
φM,O
ρO,U
MU
where
φM,U
MO O
/ MO
φM,O
/ MO
O
λU,O
/ MU
MU
φM,U
/ MU
X
1
r · m,
|O : U |
r∈R
X
1
ρO,U (1 ⊗O n) =
1 ⊗U r−1 · n,
|O : U |
λU,O (m) =
(4.11)
(4.12)
r∈R
U
m ∈ M , n ∈ N , and R ⊆ O is any set of coset representatives of O/U .
16
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proof. The space of O-invariants M O ⊆ M is a discrete left Q[O]-submodule of M .
Hence, by Claim 3.1.3, M = M O ⊕ C for some discrete left Q[O]-submodule C of
M . Since C is a discrete left Q[O]-module, one has C = limi∈I Ci , where Ci are
−→
finite-dimensional discrete left Q[G]-submodules of C. By construction, CiO = 0,
and thus, by Maschke’s theorem, (Ci )O = 0. Since Q ⊗O commutes with direct
limits, this implies that CO = 0. Hence C is contained in the kernel of the canonical
map τM : M → MO . Let φM,O = (τM )|M O denote the restriction of τM to the
Q[O]-submodule M O . Since dH1 (O, ) = 0 (cf. Prop 3.7(a), Prop. 4.1(a)), the
long exact sequence for dH• (O, ) implies that the map (M O )O → MO is injective.
As τM O : M O → (M O )O is a bijection, the commutativity of the diagram
/M
MO ◆
◆◆◆
◆◆φ◆M,O
τM O
τM
◆◆◆
◆◆&
/ MO
(M O )O
(4.13)
yields that φM,O is injective. As τM is surjective and C ⊆ ker(τM ), one concludes
that φM,O is bijective, and C = ker(τM ). The commutativity of the diagrams (4.10)
can be verified by a straightforward calculation.
4.2. The rational discrete standard bimodule Bi(G). For a t.d.l.c. group G
the set of compact open subgroups CO(G) of G with the inclusion relation ”⊆” is a
directed set, i.e., (CO(G), ⊆) is a partially ordered set, and for U, V ∈ CO(G) one
has also U ∩ V ∈ CO(G). For U, V ∈ CO(G), V ⊆ U , one has an injective mapping
of discrete left Q[U ]-modules
X
1
r V,
(4.14)
η̃U,V : Q −→ Q[U/V ],
η̃U,V (1) =
|U : V |
r∈R
G
U
where R ⊂ U is any set of coset representatives of U/V . As indG
V = indU ◦ indV ,
η̃U,V induces an injective mapping
X
1
x r V, x ∈ G.
(4.15)
ηU,V : Q[G/U ] −→ Q[G/V ], ηU,V (x U ) =
|U : V |
r∈R
By construction, one has for W ∈ CO(G), W ⊆ V ⊆ U , that ηU,W = ηV,W ◦ ηU,V .
For g ∈ G one has an isomorphism of discrete left Q[G]-modules
cU,g : Q[G/U ] −→ Q[G/U g ],
(4.16)
g
where U = g
−1
cU,g (x U ) = x g U g ,
x ∈ G,
U g. Moreover, for g, h ∈ G and U, V ∈ CO(G), V ⊆ U , one has
(4.17)
cV,g ◦ ηU,V = ηU g ,V g ◦ cU,g ,
(4.18)
cU g ,h ◦ cU,g = cU,gh .
Let Bi[G] = limU∈CO(G) (Q[G/U ], ηU,V ). Then, by definition, Bi[G] is a discrete left
−→
Q[G]-module. By (4.17), the assignment
(4.19)
(xU ) · g = cU,g (x U ) = xg U g , g, x ∈ G, U ∈ CO(G),
defines a Q-linear map · : Bi(G) × Q[G] → Bi(G), and, by (4.18), this map
defines a right Q[G]-module structure on Bi(G). By (4.19), Bi(G) is a discrete
right Q[G]-module making Bi(G) a rational discrete Q[G]-bimodule. Therefore, we
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
17
will call Bi(G) the rational discrete standard bimodule of G. It has the following
straightforward properties.
Proposition 4.3. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
(a) Bi(G) is a flat rational discrete right Q[G]-module, and a flat rational discrete left Q[G]-module, i.e.,
(4.20)
G
dTorG
k (A, Bi(G)) = dTork (Bi(G), B) = 0
for all A ∈ ob(disQ[G] ), B ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) and k ≥ 1.
(b) One has
(
Q if G is compact,
(4.21)
HomG (Q, Bi(G)) ≃
0
if G is not compact.
Proof. (a) The direct limit of flat objects is flat (cf. [14, §VIII.4, p. 195]). Thus,
by Proposition 4.1(b), Bi(G) is a flat rational discrete left Q[G]-module. A similar
argument shows that Bi(G) is also a flat rational discrete right Q[G]-module.
(b) is a direct consequence of Proposition 3.5.
Let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) and U ∈ CO(G). The composition of maps (cf. Prop. 4.2)
(4.22)
θM,U : Q[U \G] ⊗G M
ξM,U
/ Q ⊗U M
φ−1
M,U
/ MU ,
where ξM,U (U g ⊗G m) = 1 ⊗U gm, g ∈ G, m ∈ M , is an isomorphism. Moreover,
if V ∈ CO(G), V ⊆ U , one has by (4.10) a commutative diagram
(4.23)
Q[U \G] ⊗G M
θM,U
/ MU
νU,V ⊗G idM
Q[V \G] ⊗G M
/ MV
θM,V
which is natural in M , where νU,V : Q[U \G] → Q[V \G] is given by
X
1
V r−1 x,
(4.24)
νU,V (U x) =
|U : V |
r∈R
x ∈ G, and R ⊆ U is a set of coset representatives of U/V , i.e., U =
Thus the family of maps (θM,U )U∈CO(G) induces an isomorphism
(4.25)
θM : Bi(G) ⊗G M −→ M
F
r∈R
rV .
which is natural in M . Note that the map θM can be described quite explicitly.
For g ∈ G and m ∈ M the subgroup W = stabG (g · m) is open. In
F particular, for
U ∈ CO(G) the intersection U ∩W is of finite index in U . Let U = r∈R r·(U ∩W ).
Then
X
1
(4.26)
θM (U g ⊗G m) =
·
r · m.
|U : (U ∩ W )|
r∈R
From the commutative diagram (4.23) one concludes the following property.
Proposition 4.4. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. Then one has a natural isomorphism
θ : Bi(G) ⊗G −→ idQ[G] dis .
18
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Remark 4.5. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. One verifies easily using (4.26) that
·
(4.27)
= θBi(G) : Bi(G) ⊗G Bi(G) → Bi(G)
defines the structure of an associative algebra on (Bi(G), ·). However, (Bi(G), ·)
contains a unit 1Bi(G) ∈ Bi(G) if, and only if, G is compact. Nevertheless, the
algebra (Bi(G), ·) has an augmentation or co-unit, i.e., the canonical map
ε : Bi(G) → Q,
(4.28)
x ∈ G, U ∈ CO(G)
ε(xU ) = 1,
is a mapping of Q[G]-bimodules satisfying ε(a · b) = ε(a) · ε(b) for all a, b ∈ Bi(G).
The algebra Bi(G) comes also equipped with an antipode
(4.29)
S=
×
: Bi(G) → Bi(G),
S(U g) = g −1 U,
g ∈ G, U ∈ CO(G).
Again by (4.26) one verifies also that θM : Bi(G) ⊗G M → M defines the structure
of a Bi(G)-module for any rational discrete Q[G]-module M .
4.3. The Hom-⊗-identity. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let Q, M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis).
Then one has a canonical map (cf. (4.25))
(4.30)
ζQ,M : HomG (Q, Bi(G)) ⊗G M −→ HomG (Q, M ),
ζQ,M (h ⊗G m)(q) = θM (h(q) ⊗G m),
for h ∈ HomG (Q, Bi(G)), q ∈ Q, m ∈ M . Let U ⊆ G be a compact open subgroup
of G. From now on we will assume that the canonical embedding
ηU : Q[G/U ] −→ Bi(G)
(4.31)
is given by inclusion. By the Eckmann-Shapiro-type lemma (cf. §2.9), the map
(4.32)
ˆ : HomG (Q[G/U ], Bi(G)) −→ Bi(G),
ĥ = h(U ),
h ∈ HomG (Q[G/U ], Bi(G)), is injective satisfying
im(ˆ ) = spanQ { x U x | x ∈ G } ⊆ Bi(G).
(4.33)
In particular, one has an isomorphism
jU : HomG (Q[G/U ], Bi(G)) → Q[U \G]
(4.34)
induced by ˆ . Hence, by the Eckmann-Shapiro-type lemma (cf. §2.9), (4.22), and
the commutativity of the diagram
(4.35)
HomG (Q[G/U ], Bi(G)) ⊗G M
ζQ[G/U ],M
/ HomG (Q[G/U ], M )
O
jU ⊗G idM
Q[U \G] ⊗G M
/ MU
φ−1
M,U
/ MU
one concludes that ζQ[G/U],M is an isomorphism for all M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). The
additivity HomG ( , M ) yields the following.
Proposition 4.6. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let M, P ∈ ob(Q[G] dis), and assume
further that P is finitely generated and projective. Then
(4.36)
ζP,M : HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗G M −→ HomG (P, M )
is an isomorphism.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
19
4.4. Dualizing finitely generated projective rational discrete Q[G]-modules. From (4.34) one concludes that for any finitely generated projective rational
discrete left Q[G]-module P , HomG (P, Bi(G)) is a finitely generated projective rational discrete right Q[G]-module. In order to obtain a functor ⊛ : Q[G] disop →
Q[G] dis we put for M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis)
(4.37)
M ⊛ = Hom×
G (M, Bi(G))
= { ϕ ∈ HomQ (M, Bi(G)) | ∀g ∈ G ∀m ∈ M : ϕ(g · m) = m · g −1 }.
Obviously, × ◦ : HomG (M, Bi(G)) → M ⊛ (cf. (4.29)) yields an isomorphism of
Q-vector spaces. Note that for g ∈ G, ϕ ∈ M ⊛ and m ∈ M one has
(g · ϕ)(m) = g · ϕ(m).
(4.38)
By construction, if P is a finitely generated projective rational discrete left Q[G]module, then P ⊛ is a finitely generated projective rational discrete left Q[G]-module
as well. Let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis), let m ∈ M and let ϕ ∈ M ⊛ . Put
ϑM (m)(ϕ) = ϕ(m)× .
(4.39)
Then for g ∈ G one has
ϑM (m)(g · ϕ) = ((g · ϕ)(m))× = (g · ϕ(m))×
= ϕ(m)× · g −1 = ϑM (m)(ϕ) · g −1 ,
(4.40)
i.e., ϑM (m) ∈ M ⊛⊛ , and thus one has a Q-linear map ϑM : M → M ⊛⊛ . As
ϑM (g · m)(ϕ) = ϕ(g · m)× = (ϕ(m) · g −1 )×
= g · ϕ(m)× = (g · ϑM (m))(ϕ),
(4.41)
ϑM : M → M ⊛⊛ is a mapping of left Q[G]-modules. It is straightforward to verify
that one obtains a natural transformation
ϑ : idQ[G] dis −→
(4.42)
⊛⊛
.
By (4.32) and (4.34) one has for U ∈ CO(G) that ϑQ[G/U] (U ) = jU× , where jU× is
the map making the diagram
(4.43)
HomG (Q[G/U ), Bi(G))
×
/ Q[U \G]
×
◦...
Q[G/U ]⊛
jU
×
jU
/ Bi(G)
commute. This yields that ϑQ[G/U] is an isomorphism. Hence the additivity of ϑ
and the functors idQ[G] dis and ⊛⊛ imply that ϑP : P → P ⊛⊛ is an isomorphism
for every finitely generated projective rational discrete Q[G]-module P .
4.5. T.d.l.c. groups of type FP. A t.d.l.c. group G is said to be of type FP, if
(i) cdQ (G) = d < ∞;
(ii) G is of type FP∞
(cf. [14, §VIII.6]). By Lemma 3.6 and Proposition 3.12, for such a group G the trivial left Q[G]-module Q possesses a projective resolution (P• , ∂• , ε) which is finitely
generated and concentrated in degrees 0 to d. One has the following property.
20
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proposition 4.7. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group of type FP. Then
(4.44)
cdQ (G) = max{ k ≥ 0 | dHk (G, Bi(G)) 6= 0 }.
Proof. Let m = max{ k ≥ 0 | dHk (G, Bi(G)) 6= 0 }. Then m ≤ d = cdQ (G). By
definition, there exists a discrete left Q[G]-module M such that dHd (G, M ) 6= 0.
As G is of type FP∞ , the functor dHd (G, ) commutes with direct limits (cf. [14,
§VIII.4, Prop. 4.6]). Since M = limi∈I Mi , where Mi are finitely generated Q[G]−→
submodules of M , we may assume also that M is finitely generated,
i.e., there
P
exist finitely many elements m1 , . . . , mn ∈ M such that M = 1≤j≤n Q[G] · mj .
Let Oj be a compact open subgroup contained in stabG (mj ). Then one has a
`
canonical surjective map 1≤j≤n Q[G/Oj ] → M . Thus, as dHd (G, ) is right
`
exact, dHd (G, 1≤j≤n Q[G/Oj ]) 6= 0, and therefore dHd (G, Q[G/Oj ]) 6= 0 for some
element j ∈ {1, . . . , d}. Let O = Oj . For any pair of compact open subgroups
U, V of G, V ⊆ U , which are contained in O the map ηU,V : Q[G/U ] → Q[G/V ]
(cf. (4.15)) is split injective (cf. Prop. 3.1). From the additivity of dHd (G, ) one
concludes that dHd (ηU,V ) : dHd (G, Q[G/U ]) → dHd (G, Q[G/V ]) is injective. Hence
(4.45)
dHd (G, Bi(G)) = limU∈CO (G) dHd (G, Q[G/U ]) 6= 0,
−→
O
i.e., m ≥ d, and this yields the claim.
For a t.d.l.c. group G of type FP with d = cdQ (G) we will call the rational
discrete right Q[G]-module
DG = dHd (G, Bi(G))
(4.46)
the rational dualizing module of G. It has the following fundamental property.
Proposition 4.8. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group of type FP with d = cdQ (G). Then
there exists a canonical isomorphism
υ : dHd (G, ) −→ DG ⊗G
(4.47)
of covariant additive right exact functors.
Proof. Let (P• , ∂•P , εQ ) be a projective resolution of the trivial left Q[G]-module Q,
which is finitely generated and concentrated in degrees 0 to d, and let (Q• , ð• , εDG )
be a projective resolution of the discrete right Q[G]-module DG . Let (C• , ∂•C ) be
the chain complex of discrete right Q[G]-modules given by
(4.48)
Ck = HomG (Pd−k , Bi(G)), ∂kC = HomG (∂d−k+1 , Bi(G)) : Ck → Ck−1 , 0 ≤ k ≤ d,
(cf. (4.37)). In particular, by construction, H0 (C• , ∂•C ) is canonically isomorphic to
DG . Since (C• , ∂• ) is a chain complex of projectives, and as (Q• , ð• , εDG ) is exact,
the comparison theorem in homological algebra implies that there exists a mapping
of chain complexes χ• : (C• , ∂•C ) → (Q• , ð• ) which is unique up to chain homotopy
equivalence. For M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis), χ• induces a chain map
(4.49) χ•,M = χ• ⊗G idM : (C• ⊗G M, ∂•C ⊗G idM ) −→ (Q• ⊗G M, ð• ⊗G idM ).
The right exactness of
(4.50)
⊗G M implies that
H0 (χ•,M ) : H0 (C• ⊗G M ) −→ DG ⊗G M
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
21
is an isomorphism. By the Hom-⊗ identity (4.36), one has a natural isomorphism
of chain complexes
(4.51)
C• ⊗G M ≃ HomG (Pd−• , M ).
Hence H0 (C• ⊗G M ) ≃ dHd (G, M ), and this yields the claim.
Remark 4.9. A straightforward modification of the proof of Proposition 4.8 shows
that for a t.d.l.c. group G of type FP one has natural isomorphisms
(4.52)
χ̄•, : dHd−• (G, ) −→ dTorG
• (C• , [[0]]),
where dTorG
• ( , ) denotes the hyper-homology (cf. [6, §2.7], [14, §VIII.4, Ex. 7]).
4.6. Rational duality groups. A t.d.l.c. group G is said to be a rational duality
group of dimension d ≥ 0, if
(i) G is of type FP;
(ii) dHk (G, Bi(G)) = 0 for all k 6= d.
By Proposition 4.7, for such a group one has d = cdQ (G). These groups have the
following fundamental property.
Proposition 4.10. Let G be t.d.l.c. group which is a rational duality group of
dimension d ≥ 0, and let DG denote its rational dualizing module. Then one has
natural isomorphisms of (co)homological functors
(4.53)
dH• (G, ) ≃ dTorG
d−• (DG , ),
×
dH• (G, ) ≃ dExtd−•
G ( DG , ).
Proof. Let (P• , ∂• , εQ ) be a projective resolution of the trivial left Q[G]-module Q,
which is finitely generated and concentrated in degrees 0 to d. Then
(4.54) Qk = HomG (Pd−k , Bi(G)), ðk = HomG (∂d−k+1 , Bi(G)), k ∈ {0, . . . , d},
is a chain complex of projective rational discrete right Q[G]-modules concentrated
in degrees 0, . . . , d which satisfies
(
DG for k = 0,
(4.55)
Hk (Q• , ð• ) ≃
0
for k 6= 0,
By Proposition 4.6, one has for M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) isomorphisms
(4.56)
d−k
Hk (Q• ⊗G M, ð• ⊗G idM ) ≃ dTorG
k (DG , M ) ≃ dExtG (Q, M )
which are natural in M . This yields the first natural isomorphism in (4.53).
Let (P•⊛ [d], ∂•⊛ [d]) be the chain complex (P•⊛ , ∂•⊛ ) concentrated in homological
degrees −d, . . . , −0 moved d-places to the left such that it is concentrated in homological degrees 0, . . . , d, i.e.,
(
×
DG for k = 0,
⊛
⊛
(4.57)
Hk (P• [d], ∂• [d]) ≃
0
for k 6= 0.
In particular, (P•⊛ [d], ∂•⊛ [d]) is a projective resolution of the rational discrete left
Q[G]-module × DG . Then, by (4.42) and the remarks following it, one has an
isomorphism of chain complexes of projective rational discrete left Q[G]-modules
(4.58)
(P•⊛ [d]⊛ [d], ∂•⊛ [d]⊛ [d]) ≃ (P• , ∂• ).
22
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
By the same arguments as used before, one obtains for M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) and
(4.59)
Rk = HomG (P ⊛ [d]d−k , Bi(G)), δk = HomG (∂ ⊛ [d]d−k+1 , Bi(G)), k ∈ {0, . . . , d},
isomorphisms
(4.60)
d−k ×
Hk (R• ⊗G M, δ• ⊗G idM ) ≃ dTorG
k (Q, M ) ≃ dExtG ( DG , M )
which are natural in M . This yields the claim.
4.7. Locally constant functions with compact support. Let G be a t.d.l.c.
group, and let C(G, Q) denote the Q-vector space of continuous functions from G
to Q, where Q is considered as a discrete topological space. Then C(G, Q) is a
Q[G]-bimodule, where the G-actions are given by
(4.61)
(g · f )(x) = f (g −1 x), (f · g)(x) = f (x g −1 ), g, x ∈ G, f ∈ C(G, Q).
For any compact open set Ω ⊆ G let IΩ : G → Q denote the continuous function
given by IΩ (x) = 1 for x ∈ Ω and IΩ (x) = 0 for x ∈ G \ Ω. Then g · IΩ = Ig Ω and
IΩ · g = IΩ g . Moreover,
(4.62)
Cc (G, Q) = spanQ { IgU | g ∈ G, U ∈ CO(G) } ⊆ C(G, Q),
coincides with the set of locally constant functions from G to Q with compact support. It is a rational discrete Q[G]-bisubmodule of C(G, Q).
The rational discrete left Q[G]-module Bi(G) is isomorphic to the left Q[G]module Cc (G, Q), but the isomorphism is not canonical. Let O ⊆ G be a fixed
compact open subgroup of G, and put COO (G) = { U ∈ CO(G) | U ⊆ O }. The
(O)
Q-linear map ψU : Q[G/U ] → Cc (G, Q) given by
(4.63)
(O)
ψU (xU ) = |O : U | · IxU
is an injective homomorphism of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules. For U, V ∈
(O)
(O)
(O)
COO (G), V ⊆ U , one has ψV ◦ ηU,V = ψU (cf. (4.15)), and thus (ψU )U∈COO (G)
induces an isomorphism of left Q[G]-modules
(4.64)
(O)
ψ (O) : Bi(G) → Cc (G, Q),
ψ (O) |Q[G/U] = ψU .
This isomorphism has the following properties.
Proposition 4.11. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group with modular function ∆ : G → Q+ ,
i.e., if µ : Bor(G) → R+
0 ∪ {∞} is a left invarinat Haar measure on G, one has
µ(S · g) = ∆(g) · µ(S) for all S ∈ Bor(G). Let O ∈ CO(G).
(a) If U is a compact open subgroup of G containing O, then
ψ (U ) = |U : O| · ψ (O) .
(4.65)
(b) For all g, h ∈ G and u ∈ Bi(G) one has
(4.66)
ψ (O) (g · W · h) = ∆(h−1 ) · g · ψ (O) (W ) · h.
Proof. (a) Let g ∈ G and W ∈ CO(G). Then, by subsection 4.2,
X
1
(4.67)
gW =
·
g · r · (W ∩ O).
|W : W ∩ O|
r∈R
Here we omitted the mappings ηW,W ∩O in the notation. Hence
(4.68)
ψ (O) (gW ) =
µ(O)
|O : W ∩ O|
· IgW =
· IgW ,
|W : W ∩ O|
µ(W )
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
23
for some left invariant Haar measure µ on G, and
(4.69)
ψ (U ) (gW ) =
µ(U)
· IgW .
µ(W )
As µ(U) = |U : O| · µ(O), this yields the claim.
(b) As ψ (O) is a homomorphism of left Q[G]-modules, it suffices
to prove the claim
F
for g = 1 and u = W ∈ CO(G). If W h = h−1 · W · h = s∈S s · (W h ∩ O), one
obtains by (a) that
ψ (O) (W h) = h · ψ (O) (W h )
X
1
=h·
·
ψ (O) (s · (W h ∩ O)).
h
h
|W : W ∩ O|
s∈S
h
(4.70)
=
µ(O)
|O : W ∩ O|
· IW h =
· IW h .
|W h : W h ∩ O|
µ(W h )
In particular, ψ (O) (W h) = µ(W )/µ(W h ) · ψ (O) (W ) · h. Since
(4.71)
µ(W h ) = µ(h−1 W h) = µ(W h) = ∆(h) · µ(W ),
this completes the proof.
L
Remark 4.12. With a particular choice of Haar measure µ : Bor(G) → R+
0 ∪ {∞}
on G one can make (Cc (G, Q), ∗µ ) an associative algebra where ∗µ is convolution
with respect to µ. However, we have seen that Bi(G) carries an algebra structure
which is independent of the choosen Haar measure µ (cf. Remark 4.5). Both
rational discrete Q[G]-bimodules Bi(G) and Cc (G, Q) will turn out to be useful.
The standard rational Q[G]-bimodule Bi(G) seem to be the canonical choice for
studying Hom-⊗ identities or dualizing functors (cf. §4.3, §4.4); while Cc (G, Q)
seem to be the right choice for relating the cohomology groups dH• (G, Cc (G, Q))
with the cohomology with compact support of certain topological spaces associated
to G (cf. §6.8).
Remark 4.13. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let ∆ : G → Q+ denote its modular function. Let Q(∆) denote the rational discrete left Q[G]-module which is
isomorphic - as abelian group - to Q and which G-action is given by
(4.72)
g · q = ∆(g) · q,
g ∈ G, q ∈ Q(∆).
Let Q(∆)× denote the rational discrete right Q[G]-module associated to Q(∆), i.e.,
Q(∆)× = Q(∆) and for g ∈ G and q ∈ Q(∆)× one has q · g = g −1 · q. Then, by
Proposition 4.11(b), one has a (non-canonical) isomorphism
(4.73)
Bi(G) ≃G Cc (G) ⊗ Q(∆)×
of rational discrete right Q[G]-modules. Considering Q(∆)× as a trivial left Q[G]module, the isomorphism (4.73) can be interpreted as an isomorphism of rational
discrete Q[G]-bimodules.
24
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
4.8. The trace map. For a compact open subgroup O of G let µO denote the
left-invariant Haar measure on G satisfying µO (O) = 1, i.e., if U is a compact open
subgroup of G containing O, then µO = |U : O| · µU . We also denote by
h(G) = Q · µO
(4.74)
the 1-dimensional Q-vector space generated by all Haar measures µO , O ∈ CO(G).
One has a Q-linear map
tr = ψ (O) ( )(1) · µO : Bi(G) −→ h(G),
(4.75)
which is independent of the choice of the compact open subgroup O of G, i.e., for
all u ∈ Bi(G) and all O, U ∈ CO(G) one has
(4.76)
tr(u) = ψ (O) (u)(1) · µO = ψ (U ) (u)(1) · µU
(cf. (4.65)). In particular, by definition,
(
µO
(4.77)
tr(Og) =
0
if Og = O,
if Og =
6 O.
In case that G is unimodular one has the following.
Proposition 4.14. Let G be a unimodular t.d.l.c. group. Then one has
(4.78)
tr(g · u) = tr(u · g)
for all u ∈ Bi(G) and g ∈ G.
In particular, putting Bi(G) = Bi(G)/h g · u − u · g | u ∈ Bi(G), g ∈ G iQ , the
Q-linear map tr induces a Q-linear map tr : Bi(G) −→ h(G).
Proof. Since (g · f )(1) = (f · g)(1) = f (g −1 ) for all g ∈ G and f ∈ C(G, Q), one
concludes from (4.66) that
(4.79)
tr(g · u) − tr(u · g) = (ψ (O) (u)(g −1 ) − ψ (O) (u)(g −1 )) · µO = 0.
This yields the claim.
4.9. Homomorphism into the bimodule Cc (G, Q). Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
In order to simplify notations we put Cc (G) = Cc (G, Q) (cf. (4.62)). For a rational
discrete left Q[G]-module M we put also
M ⊙ = HomG (M, Cc (G)),
(4.80)
and consider M ⊙ as left Q[G]-module, i.e., for g ∈ G and h ∈ M ⊙ one has
(g · h)(m) = h(m) · g −1 .
(4.81)
One has a homomorphism of Q-vector spaces
(4.82)
∨
M
: HomG (M, Cc (G)) −→ HomQ (M, Q),
which is given by evaluation in 1 ∈ G, i.e., for m ∈ M and h ∈ M ⊙ one has
(4.83)
h∨
M (m) = h(m)(1).
The Q-vector space M ∗ = HomQ (M, Q) carries canonically the structure of a left
Q[G]-module, i.e., for g ∈ G and f ∈ M ∗ one has
(4.84)
(g · f )(m) = f (g −1 · m).
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
25
However, M ∗ is not necessarily a discrete Q[G]-module. For m ∈ M , g ∈ G and
h ∈ HomG (M, Cc (G)) one concludes from (4.81) and (4.84) that
−1
(g · h)∨
)(1) = h(m)(g)
M (m) = (g · h)(m) (1) = (h(m) · g
−1
−1
−1
(4.85)
= g · h(m) (1) = h(g · m)(1) = h∨
· m),
M (g
i.e., ∨
M is a homomorphism of left Q[G]-modules. This homomorphism has the
following property.
Proposition 4.15. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis). Then
∨
⊙
→ M ∗ is injective.
M: M
Proof. Let h ∈ M ⊙ , h 6= 0, i.e., there exists m ∈ M with h(m) 6= 0. In particular,
there exists g ∈ G such that h(m)(g) 6= 0. Since
(4.86)
−1
h(m)(g) = (g −1 · h(m))(1) = h(g −1 · m)(1) = h∨
· m),
M (g
this implies h∨
M 6= 0.
Let α : B → M be a homomorphism of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules. Then
for h ∈ M ⊙ and b ∈ B one has (cf. (4.83))
⊙
α⊙ (h)∨
B (b) = α (h)(b) (1) = h(α(b))(1)
∗ ∨
= h∨
M (α(b)) = α (hM )(b),
(4.87)
i.e., the diagram
M⊙
(4.88)
α⊙
/ B⊙
∨
M
M∗
∨
B
∗
α
/ B∗
is commutative.
4.10. Proper signed discrete left G-sets. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. A signed
discrete left G-set Ω (cf. §3.3) will be said to be proper, if G has finitely many
orbits on Ω and stabG (ω) is compact for all ω ∈ Ω. In particular, Q[Ω] is a finitely
generated projective rational discrete left Q[G]-module (cf. (3.8)). For ω ∈ Ω define
ω ∗ ∈ Q[Ω]∗ by
if ξ = ω,
1
∗
(4.89)
ω (ξ) = −1 if ξ = ω̄,
and
0
if ξ 6∈ {ω, ω̄}.
In particular, if g ∈ G then
(4.90)
g · ω ∗ = (g · ω)∗ .
For a proper signed discrete left G-set Ω we put also
(4.91)
Q[Ω∗ ] = spanQ { ω ∗ | ω ∈ Ω} ⊆ Q[Ω]∗ .
In particular, as Ω∗ = { ω ∗ | ω ∈ Ω } is a proper signed discrete left G-set, Q[Ω∗ ]
is a finitely generated projective discrete left Q[G]-module. One has the following
property.
26
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proposition 4.16. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let Ω be a proper signed discrete
∗
∨
left G-set. Then im( ∨
Q[Ω] ) = Q[Ω ]. In particular,
Q[Ω] induces an isomorphism
∗
⊙
∨
].
−→
Q[Ω
:
Q[Ω]
Ω
Proof. In suffices to prove the claim for a proper signed discrete left G-set Ω with
one G × C2 -orbit (cf. (3.8)). We distinguish the two cases.
Case 1: G acts without inversion on Ω. Let ω ∈ Ω and put O = stabG (ω). By
hypothesis, Ω = G · ω ⊔ G · ω̄. Let R ⊆ G be a set of representatives for G/O.
For x ∈ R there exists hx ∈ Q[Ω]⊙ = HomG (Q[Ω], Cc (G)) given by hx (ω) = IOx−1 .
Moreover, as O Cc (G) = spanQ { IOx−1 | x ∈ R } (cf. (4.34) and (4.64)), one has
Q[Ω]⊙ = spanQ { hx | x ∈ R }. For ̟ ∈ G · ω there exists a unique element y ∈ R
such that ̟ = y · ω. Hence
∨
(4.92) (hx )∨
Q[Ω] (̟) = (hx )Q[Ω] (y · ω) = hx (y · ω)(1) = IyOx−1 (1) = IyO (x) = δx,y .
∨
∗
Thus (hx )∨
Q[Ω] = (x·ω) . From this fact one concludes that Q[Ω] induces a mapping
∗
⊙
−→ Q[Ω ], and that Ω is surjective. Hence the claim follows from
Ω : Q[Ω]
Proposition 4.15.
Case 2: G acts with inversion on Ω. Let ω ∈ Ω and σ ∈ G be such that σ·ω = ω̄.
Put U = stabG ({ω, ω̄}) and O = stabG (ω). In particular, O is normal in U and
σ ∈ U. Let S ⊆ G be a set of representatives for G/U, and put R = S ⊔ Sσ.
Then R is a set of representatives for G/O. For x ∈ S there exists kx ∈ Q[Ω]⊙ =
HomG (Q[Ω], Cc (G)) given by kx (ω) = IOx−1 − IOσ−1 x−1 . Moreover, as before one
has O Cc (G) = spanQ { IOz−1 | z ∈ R }, and spanQ { kx | x ∈ S } coincides with the
eigenspace of the endomorphism σ◦ ∈ End(O Cc (G)) with respect to the eigenvalue
−1. Thus Q[Ω]⊙ = spanQ { kx | x ∈ S }.
By hypothesis, Ω = G · ω. Let Ω+ = S · ω. Then Ω = Ω+ ⊔ Ω− , where
−
Ω = {̟
¯ | ̟ ∈ Ω+ }. Hence for ̟ ∈ Ω+ there exists a unique element y ∈ S such
that ̟ = y · ω. This yields
∨
(kx )∨
Q[Ω] (̟) = (kx )Q[Ω] (y · ω) = kx (y · ω)(1) = IyOx−1 (1) − IyOσ−1 x−1 (1).
(4.93)
= IyOx−1 (1) = δx,y
Here we used the fact that IyOσ−1 x−1 (1) = IyU x−1 (1) − IyOx−1 (1) = 0. Hence
∗
(kx )∨
Q[Ω] = (x · ω) and the claim follows by the same argument as in the previous
case.
One also concludes the following.
Proposition 4.17. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let Ξ and Ω be proper signed discrete
left G-sets, and let α : Q[Ξ] → Q[Ω] be a proper homomorphism of left Q[G]-modules
(cf. (A.20)). Then one has a commutative diagram
(4.94)
Q[Ω]⊙
α⊙
∨
Ω
Q[Ω∗ ]
/ Q[Ξ]⊙
∨
Ξ
α
∗
/ Q[Ξ∗ ],
where the vertical maps are isomorphisms.
Proof. This is an immediate consequence of Proposition 4.16 and the commutativity
of the diagram (4.88).
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
27
5. Discrete actions of t.d.l.c. groups on graphs
The notion of graph which will be used throughout the paper coincides with the
notion used by J-P. Serre in [41], i.e., a graph Γ = (V(Γ), E(Γ)) will consist of a set
of vertices V(Γ), a set of edges E(Γ), an origin mapping o : V(Γ) → E(Γ), a terminus
mapping t : V(Γ) → E(Γ) and an edge inversion mapping ¯ : E(Γ) → E(Γ) satisfying
¯ = e,
ē
ē 6= e
(5.1)
t(ē) = o(e),
o(ē) = t(e),
for all e ∈ E(Γ) (cf. [41, §I.2.1]). In particular, E(Γ) is a signed set (cf. §A.5). Such
a graph is said to be combinatorial, if the map
(t, o) : E(Γ) −→ V(Γ) × V(Γ)
(5.2)
is injective. Moreover, Γ is said to be locally finite, if stΓ (v) = { e ∈ E(Γ) | o(e) = v }
is finite for every vertex v ∈ V(Γ).
5.1. The exact sequence associated to a graph. For a graph Γ let
(5.3)
V(Γ) = Q[V(Γ)]
denote the free Q-vector space over the set of vertices of Γ, and let
E(Γ) = Q[E(Γ)] = Q[E(Γ)]/h e + ē | e ∈ E(Γ) i,
(5.4)
(cf. (A.16)), i.e., if e ∈ E[Γ] denotes the image of e ∈ E(Γ) in E(Γ), one has ē = −e.
One has a canonical Q-linear mapping ∂ : E(Γ) → V(Γ) given by
∂(e) = t(e) − o(e),
(5.5)
e ∈ E(Γ),
which has the following well known properties (cf. [41, §2.3, Cor. 1]).
Fact 5.1. Let Γ = (V(Γ), E(Γ)) be a graph, and let ∂ : E(Γ) → V(Γ) be the map
given by (5.5). Then
(a) ker(∂) ≃ H1 (|Γ|, Q), where |Γ| denotes the topological realization of Γ.
(b) coker(∂) ≃ Q[V(Γ)/ ∼], where ∼ is the connectedness relation, i.e., Γ is
connected, if and only if, coker(∂) ≃ Q.
In particular, Γ is a tree if, and only if, ker(∂) = 0 and coker(∂) ≃ Q.
Let L(Γ) = ker(∂), i.e., if Γ is a connected graph the sequence
(5.6)
0
/ L(Γ)
/ E(Γ)
∂
/ V(Γ)
ε
/Q
/0
is exact.
5.2. Rough Cayley graphs. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let O be a compact open
subgroup of G, and let S ⊆ G \ O be a symmetric subset of G intersecting O
trivially, i.e., s ∈ S implies s−1 ∈ S. The rough Cayley graph Γ = Γ(G, S, O)
associated with (G, S, O) is the graph given by V(Γ) = G/O and
(5.7)
E(Γ) = { (gO, gsO) | g ∈ G, s ∈ S }.
The origin mapping is given by the projection on the first coordinate, the terminus
mapping is given by the projection on the second coordinate, while the edge inversion mapping permutes the first and second coordinate. The definition we have
chosen here follows the approach used in [29, §2]. However, in our setup edges of
a graph are directed, and we do not claim Γ to be connected. By construction, G
has a discrete left action on Γ = Γ(G, S, O). It is straightforward to verify that Γ
is combinatorial. One has the following properties.
28
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proposition 5.2. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, let O be a compact open subgroup of
G, let S be a symmetric subset of G \ O, and let Γ = Γ(G, S, O) be the rough Cayley
graph associated with (G, S, O).
(a) G acts transitively on the set of vertices of Γ;
(b) if S is a finite set, then Γ is locally finite;
(c) Γ is connected if, and only if, G is generated by O and S, i.e., G = h S, O i.
Proof. (a) is obvious.
(b) Suppose that S is finite. By (a), it suffices to show that stΓ (O) is a finite set.
By definition, stΓ (O) = { (ωO, ωsO | ω ∈ O, s ∈ S }. Since O is compact open
in G, any double coset OsO is the union of finitely many right cosets g1 (s)O,. . . ,
gα(s) (s)O, i.e., t(stΓ (O)) = { gj (s)O | s ∈ S, 1 ≤ j ≤ α(s) }. As Γ is combinatorial,
the restriction of t to stΓ (O) is injective. This yields the claim.
(c) Suppose that Γ is connected, and let g ∈ G. Then there exists a path p =
e0 · · · en from O to gO, i.e., o(e0 ) = O, t(en ) = gO and o(ej ) = t(ej−1 ) for
1 ≤ j ≤ n. Let gj ∈ G, sj ∈ S such that ej = (gj O, gj sj O) for 0 ≤ j ≤ n, i.e.,
g0 = ω0 ∈ O. By induction, one concludes that gj ∈ h S, O i for all 1 ≤ j ≤ n. By
construction, there exists ωn ∈ O such that gn sn ωn = g. In particular, g ∈ h S, O i,
and thus G = h S, O i.
Suppose now that G = h S, O i. By (a), it suffices to show that for any vertex
gO ∈ V(Γ), there is a path from O to gO. By hypothesis, there exists elements
s1 , . . . , sn ∈ S and ω0 , . . . , ωn ∈ O such that g = ω0 s1 · · · sn ωn . Hence for e0 =
(ω0 O, ω0 s1 O) and ek = (ω0 s1 · · · sk−1 ωk−1 O, ω0 s1 · · · sk O) for 1 ≤ k ≤ n one
verifies easily that p = e0 · · · en is a path from O to gO. Thus Γ is connected.
5.3. T.d.l.c. groups of type FP1 . It is well known that a discrete group is finitely generated if, and only if, it is of type FP1 (cf. [14, Ex. 1d of §I.2 and Ex. 1 of
§VIII]). For t.d.l.c. groups one has the following.
Theorem 5.3. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. Then the following are equivalent.
(i) The group G is compactly generated.
ε
(ii) The discrete Q[G]-module ker(Q[G/O] → Q) is finitely generated for any
compact open subgroup O of G, where ε is the augmentation map.
ε
(iii) There exists a compact open subgroup O of G such that ker(Q[G/O] → Q)
is finitely generated.
(iv) The group G is of type FP1 .
Proof. The implication (ii)⇒(iii) is trivial, and, by Proposition 3.12, (iii) and (iv)
are equivalent. Suppose that G is compactly generated, and let O be any compact
open subgroup of G. Then there exists a finite symmetric subset S ⊆ G \ O such
that G = h S, O i. Let Γ = Γ(G, S, O) be the rough Cayley graph associated with
(G, S, O). Then, as Γ is connected (cf. Prop. 5.2), one has a short exact sequence
(cf. (5.6))
(5.8)
E(Γ)
∂
/ Q[G/O]
ε
/Q
/ 0.
Moreover, as E(Γ) is a rational discrete left Q[G]-module being generated by the
finite subset { (O, sO) | s ∈ S }, ker(ε) is finitely generated. This shows (i)⇒(ii).
Let O be a compact open subgroup of G such that K = ker(εO : Q[G/O] → Q) is
a finitely generated discrete left Q[G]-module, i.e., there exist finitely many elements
u1 , . . . , un ∈ K generating K as Q[G]-module. The set B = { gO −O | g ∈ G\O } is
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
29
a generating set of K as Q-vector space, i.e., any element uj is a linear combination
of finitely many elements of B. Hence there exists a finite subset S ⊂ G \ O such
that any element uj is a linear combination of Σ = { sO − O | s ∈ S }. Adjoining
the inverses of elements in S if necessary, we may also assume that S is symmetric,
i.e., s ∈ S implies s−1 ∈ S. Note that, by construction, one has
P
P
(5.9)
K = 1≤j≤n Q[G] · uj = s∈S Q[G] · (sO − O).
Let Γ = Γ(G, S, O) be the rough Cayley graph associated with (G, S, O), and let
∂ : E(Γ) → Q[G/O] denote the canonical map, where we have identified V(Γ) with
Q[G/O]. Then im(∂) ⊆ ker(εO ), and sO − O ∈ im(∂) for all s ∈ S (cf. (5.5),
(5.7)). In particular, by (5.9), im(∂) = K, and coker(∂) ≃ Q, i.e., Γ is connected
(cf. Fact 5.1(b)). Therefore, G = h S, O i (cf. Prop. 5.2(c)), and G is compactly
generated. This yields the implication (iii)⇒(i) and completes the proof.
5.4. T.d.l.c. groups acting discretely on a tree. Let G be a group acting
discretely on a graph Γ, i.e., all vertex stabilizers Gv = stabG (v), v ∈ V(Γ), and
all edge stabilizers Ge = stabG (e), e ∈ E(Γ) are open. For e ∈ E(Γ) the set {e, ē}
will be called a geometric edge of Γ. By E g (Γ) we denote the set of all geometric
edges of Γ, i.e., E g (Γ) = E(Γ)/C2 , where C2 is the cyclic group of order 2 where
the involution is acting by edge inversion. Let G{e} denote the stabilizer of the
geometric edge {e, ē}, i.e., one has a sign character
sgne : G{e} −→ {±1}.
(5.10)
By Qe we denote the 1-dimensional rational discrete left Q[G{e} ]-module with action given by (5.10), i.e., for g ∈ G{e} and q ∈ Qe one has g · q = sgne (g) · q.
For a tree T one has L(T ) = 0. Hence the exact sequence (5.6) specializes
to a short exact sequence. This fact implies the following version of a result of
I. Chiswell (cf. [14, p. 179], [23]).
Proposition 5.4. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group acting discretely on a tree T . Let
RV ⊆ V(T ) be a set of representatives of the G-orbits on V(T ), and let RE ⊆ E(T )
be a set of representatives of the G × C2 -orbits on E(T ).
(a) For M ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) one has a long exact sequence
(5.11)
Q
Q
k
k
/
/
/ dHk (G, M )
...
v∈RV dH (Gv , M )
e∈RE dH (G{e} , M ⊗ Qe )
/ ...
(b) Suppose that Gv is compact for all v ∈ V(T ). Then cdQ (G) ≤ 1. In
particular, (5.11) specializes to an exact sequence
Q
0
/ dH0 (G, M )
/
(5.12)
0
v∈RV dH (Gv , M )
0o
dH1 (G, M ) o
Q
e∈RE
dH0 (G{e} , M ⊗ Qe )
Proof. (a) By hypothesis, one has isomorphisms
`
V(T )≃ v∈RV indG
Gv (Q),
(5.13)
`
E(T )≃ e∈RE indG
G{e} (Qe ),
30
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
and a short exact sequence
(5.14)
0
/ E(T )
∂
/ V(T )
ε
/Q
/ 0.
of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules. Hence (5.11) is a direct consequence of the
long exact sequence associated to dExt•G ( , M ) and (5.14), the Eckmann-Shapiro
lemma (cf. §2.9), and the isomorphisms dExtkG{e} (Qe , M ) ≃ dHk (G{e} , M ⊗ Qe )
which are natural in M .
(b) By hypothesis, Gv is compact open, and Ge is open for all v ∈ V(T ) and
e ∈ E(T ). As Ge ⊆ Gt(e) , this implies that Ge and G{e} are also compact and
open. Hence (5.14) is a projective resolution of Q in Q[G] dis, and thus cdQ (G) ≤ 1.
The exact sequence (5.12) follows from (5.11) and the fact that in this case one has
cdQ (Gv ) = cdQ (G{e} ) = 0 (cf. Prop. 3.7(a)).
Remark 5.5. If G is a compactly generated t.d.l.c. group, then dH1 (G, Bi(G)) must
have dimension 0, 1 or ∞. It is shown in [21] that in
`the latter case G is either
isomorphic to a free product with amalgamation H U O, where H is an open
subgroup of G, O is a compact open subgroup of G and |O : O ∩ H| 6= 1, or
G is isomorphic to an HNN-extension HNN(H, ϕ) for some open subgroup H, O
and U are compact open subgroups of H with at least one of them different from
H and ϕ : O → U is an isomorphism, i.e., Stallings’ decomposition theorem holds
for compactly generated t.d.l.c. groups. As a consequence a compactly generated
t.d.l.c. group G satisfying dim(dH1 (G, Bi(G))) ≥ 2 must have a non-trivial discrete
action on some tree T .
5.5. Fundamental groups of graphs of profinite groups. Let Λ be a connected
graph. A graph of profinite groups (A, Λ) based on the graph Λ consists of
(i) a profinite group Av for every vertex v ∈ V(Λ);
(ii) a profinite group Ae for every edge e ∈ E(Λ) satisfying Ae = Aē ;
(iii) an open embedding ιe : Ae → At(e) for every edge e ∈ E(Λ).
For a graph of groups (A, Λ) one defines the group F (A, Λ) (cf. [41, §I.5.1]) as the
group generated by Av , v ∈ V(Λ), and e ∈ E(Λ) subject to the relations
(5.15)
e−1 = ē and e ιe (a)e−1 = ιē (a) for all e ∈ E(Λ), a ∈ Ae .
Let Ξ ⊆ Λ be a maximal subtree of Λ. The fundamental group π1 (A, Λ, Ξ) of the
graph of groups (A, Λ) with respect to Ξ is given by
(5.16)
Π = π1 (A, Λ, Ξ) = F (A, Λ)/h e | e ∈ E(Ξ) i
(cf. [41, §I.5.1]). Choosing an orientation E + ⊂ E(Λ) of Λ one may construct a tree
T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + ) with a canonical left Π-action (cf. [41, §I.5.1, Thm. 12]). The
fundamental group of a graph of profinite groups carries naturally the structure
of t.d.l.c. group. Indeed, the set of all open subgroups of vertex stabilizers are a
neighborhood basis of the identity element of the topology. Thus from the Main
Theorem of Bass-Serre theory one concludes the following.
Proposition 5.6. Let (A, Λ) be a graph of profinite groups, let Ξ ⊆ Λ be a maximal
subtree of Λ, and let E + ⊂ E(Λ) be an orientation of Λ. Then Π = π1 (A, Λ, Ξ) carries naturally the structure of a t.d.l.c. group, and its action on T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + )
is discrete and proper, i.e., vertex stabilizers and edge stabilizers are compact and
open. In particular, cdQ (Π) ≤ 1.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
31
Proof. This follows from the Main Theorem of Bass-Serre theory and Proposition 5.4(b).
Remark 5.7. The Main Theorem of Bass-Serre theory would yield more information
than stated in Proposition 5.6. Indeed, a discrete and proper action of a t.d.l.c.
group G on a tree T can be used to define a graph of profinite groups (A, Λ) such
that G ≃ π1 (A, Λ, Ξ).
5.6. Nested t.d.l.c. groups. A t.d.l.c. group G is said to be nested, if there
exists a countable ascending sequence of compact open subgroups (Ok )k≥0 of G
such that
S
(5.17)
G = k≥0 Ok .
Such a group can be represented as the fundamental group of the graph of profinite
groups
(5.18)
(A, Λ) :
O1
•
O1
O2
•
O2
O3
•
O3
O4
•
O4
O5
•
O5
...
based on the straight infinite half line Λ, where all injections are the canonical ones,
i.e., one has
(5.19)
G ≃ π1 (A, Λ, Λ).
Thus from Proposition 5.6 one concludes the following.
Proposition 5.8. Let G be a nested t.d.l.c. group. Then cdQ (G) ≤ 1.
S
Remark 5.9. Let p be a prime number. Then Qp = k≥0 p−k Zp , the additive
group of the p-adic numbers is a nested t.d.l.c. group, but Qp is not compact.
Hence cdQ (Qp ) = 1.
5.7. Generalized presentations of a t.d.l.c. groups. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
A generalized presentation of G is a graph of profinite groups (A, Λ) together with
a continuous open surjective homomorphism
(5.20)
φ : π1 (A, Λ, Ξ) −→ G,
such that φ|Av is injective for all v ∈ V(Λ).
Proposition 5.10. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
(a) G has a generalized presentation ((A, Λ0 ), φ), where Λ0 is a graph with a
single vertex.
(b) For any generalized presentation ((A, Λ), φ), K = ker(φ) is a discrete free
group contained in the quasi-center
(5.21)
QZ(Π) = { g ∈ Π | CΠ (g) is open in Π }.
of Π = π1 (A, Λ, Ξ). In particular,
(5.22)
R(φ) = K/[K, K] ⊗Z Q
is a rational discrete left Q[G]-module.
(c) If ((Ai , Λi ), φi ), i = 1, 2, are two presentations of G, then R(φ1 ) and
R(φ2 ) are stably equivalent, i.e., there exist projective rational discrete
Q[G]-modules P1 and P2 such that R(φ1 ) ⊕ P1 ≃ R(φ2 ) ⊕ P2 .
32
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Proof. (a) By van Dantzig’s theorem there exists a compact open subgroup O of G.
Choose a subset S of G such that G =< O, S >. Without loss of generality we may
assume that S = S −1 , and choose a subset S + ⊆ S such that S = S + ∪ (S + )−1 .
Let Λ0 be the graph with a single vertex v with a loop attached for any s ∈ S + , i.e.,
V(Λ0 ) = {v} and E(Λ0 ) = { es , ēs | s ∈ S + }. Let (A, Λ0 ) be the graph of profinite
groups based on Λ0 defined as follows:
- Av = O;
- Aes = Aēs = O ∩ s−1 Os for all s ∈ S + ;
is
Av for all s ∈ S + , where is is left conjugation by
- αes : Aes −→ s−1 Os −→
s;
- αēs : Aes → Av is the canonical inclusion for all s ∈ S + .
Clearly, (A, Λ0 ) is a graph of profinite groups, and for the canonical map
(5.23)
φ0 : E(Λ0 ) ∪ O → G,
φ(es ) = φ(ēs )−1 = s, φ0 (w) = w, w ∈ O,
the relations (5.15) are satisfied. The edge set of the maximal subtree Ξ is empty.
Hence F (A, Λ0 ) → π1 (A, Λ0 , Ξ) is an isomorphism. This show that there exists a
unique group homomorphism φ : π1 (A, Λ0 , Ξ) → G such that φ|E(Λ0 )∪O = φ0 . By
construction, φ is surjective and φ|Av is injective. Hence ((A, Λ0 ), φ) is a generalized
presentation.
(b) Let T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + ). Then, by construction, any non-trivial element of K
acts without inversion of edges and without fixed points on T . Thus, by Stallings’
theorem (cf. [41, §I.3.3, Thm. 4]), K is a free discrete group. As K is normal in Π
and discrete, K must be contained in QZ(Π). This implies that R(φ) is a rational
discrete left Q[G]-module.
(c) Let Πi = π1 (Ai , Λi , Ξi ), and let Ti = T (Ai , Λi , Ξi , Ei+ ) be trees associated to
(Ai , Λi ). In particular, Πi is acting without inversion on Ti . Put Ki = ker(φi ).
Then for the quotient graphs Γi = Ti //Ki ,
(5.24)
E(Γi )
∂i
/ V(Γi )
εi
/Q
are partial projective resolutions of Q in Q[G] dis. Hence, by Schanuel’s lemma (cf.
[14, §VIII.4, Lemma 4.2]), ker(∂1 ) and ker(∂2 ) are stably equivalent. By Fact 5.1(a),
one has ker(∂1 ) ≃ R(φ1 ) and ker(∂2 ) ≃ R(φ2 ). This yields the claim.
Remark 5.11. Let ((A, Λ), φ) be a presentation of the t.d.l.c. group G. One should
think of R(φ) as the relation module of the presentation ((A, Λ), φ). By Proposition 5.10, its stable isomorphism type is an invariant of the t.d.l.c. group G.
5.8. Compactly presented t.d.l.c. groups. A t.d.l.c. group G is said to be
compactly presented, if there exists a presentation ((A, Λ), φ), such that
(i) Λ is a finite connected graph, and
(ii) K = ker(φ) is finitely generated as a normal subgroup of Π = π1 (A, Λ, Ξ).
Condition (i) implies that such a group G must be compactly generated. Hence
G is of type FP1 (cf. Thm. 5.3). From condition (ii) follows that R(φ) is a
finitely generated rational discrete Q[G]-module. Thus, as R(φ) ≃ L(Γ), where
T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + ) and Γ = T //K (cf. (5.6)), G must be of type FP2 (cf.
Prop. 3.12).
It has been an open problem for a long time whether discrete groups of type
FP2 are indeed finitely presented. Finally, it has been answered negatively by
M. Betsvina and N. Brady in [7]. In our context the following question arises.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
33
Question 2. Does there exist a non-discrete t.d.l.c. group G which is of type FP2 ,
but which is not compactly presented?
6. G-spaces for topological groups of type OS
Throughout this section we assume that G is a topological group of type OS,
and that F ⊆ Osgrp(G) is a non-empty subset of open subgroups of G satisfying
(F1 ) for A ∈ F and g ∈ G one has g A = gAg −1 ∈ F;
(F2 ) for A, B ∈ F one has A ∩ B ∈ F;
In some cases it will be helpful to assume that the class F satisfies additionally the
following condition.
(F3 ) for A, B ∈ Osgrp(G), B ⊆ A, |A : B| < ∞ and B ∈ F one has A ∈ F.
6.1. F-discrete G-spaces. Let G be a topological group of type OS. We fix a nonempty set of open subgroups F satisfying (F1 ) and (F2 ). A non-trivial topological
space X together with a continuous left G-action · : G × X → X will be called
a left G-space. Such a space will be said to be F-discrete, if stabG (x) ∈ F for all
x ∈ X. A continuous map f : X → Y of left G-spaces which commutes with the
G-action is called a mapping of G-spaces. The non-empty G-space X together with
an increasing filtration (X n )n≥0 of closed subspaces X n ⊆ X is called a (G, F)CW-complex, if
S
(C1 ) X = n≥0 X n ;
(C2 ) X 0 is an F-discrete subspace of X;
(C3 ) for n ≥ 1 there is an F-discrete G-space Λn , G-maps f : S n−1 × Λn → X n−1
and fb: B n × Λn → X n such that
(6.1)
S n−1 × Λn
f
/ X n−1
B n × Λn
fb
/ Xn
is a pushout diagram, where S n−1 denotes the unit sphere and B n the unit
ball in euclidean n-space (with trivial G-action);
(C4 ) a subspace Y ⊂ X is closed if, and only if, Y ∩ X n is closed for all n ≥ 0.
The dimension of X is defined by
(6.2)
dim(X) = min({ k ∈ N0 | X k = X } ∪ {∞}).
Moreover, X is said to be of type Fn , n ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}, if G has finitely many orbits
on Λk for 0 ≤ k ≤ n.
6.2. The F-universal G-CW-complex. Let G be a topological group of type
OS, and let F ⊆ Osgrp(G) be a non-empty set of open subgroups satisfying (F1 )
and (F2 ). A left G-CW-complex X said to be F-universal or an E F (G)-space, if
(U1 ) X is contractable;
(U2 ) for all x ∈ X one has stabG (x) ∈ F;
(U3 ) for all A ∈ F the set of A-fixed points X A is non-empty and contractable.
It is well known that an F-universal G-CW-complex E F (G) exists and is unique
up to G-homotopy. The G-CW-complex E F (G) is universal with respect to all
G-CW-complexes with point stabilizers in F, i.e., if X is a G-CW-complex with
34
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
stabG (x) ∈ F for all x ∈ X, then there exists a G-map X → E F (G) which is unique
up to G-homotopy (cf. [32, Remark 2.5], [47, Chap. 1, Ex. 6.18.7]). This space can
be explicitly
constructed as the union of the n-fold joins of the discrete G-space
F
ΩF = A∈F G/A (cf. [32, §2], [47, Chap. 1, §6]). This notion leads to an obvious
notion of dimension, i.e.,
(6.3)
dimF (G) = min{ dim(X) | X an E F (G)-space } ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}
may be considered as the topological F-dimension of G. Although this might be
the most natural dimension to be considered, we prefered to introduce and study
a combinatorial version of this dimension, the simplicial F-dimension of G. This
choice is motivated by the fact, that for the examples we are interested in the E F (G)spaces arise naturally as the topological realization of certain simplicial complexes.
6.3. Simplicial G-complexes. A simplicial complex (cf. §A.1) Σ with a left Gaction will be called a simplicial G-complex. The simplicial G-complex Σ is said to
be of type Fn , n ∈ N0 , if G has finitely many orbits on Σq for all q ∈ {0, . . . , n },
and of type F∞ , if it is of type Fn for all n ∈ N0 . For a simplicial G-complex Σ and
a q-simplex ω = {x0 , . . . , xq } ∈ Σq we denote by
T
stabG (ω) = 0≤j≤q stabG (xj ),
(6.4)
stabG {ω} = { g ∈ G | g · ω = g },
the pointwise and setwise stabilizer of ω, respectively. In particular, one has
stabG (ω) ⊆ stabG {ω}, and |stabG {ω} : stabG (ω)| < ∞. The simplicial G-complex
Σ will be said to be G-tame3 if stabG (ω) = stabG {ω} for all ω ∈ Σ. For the convenience of the reader some basic properties of simplicial complexes are recollected
in §A.
6.4. F-discrete simplical G-complexes. Let G be a topological group of type
OS, and let F ⊆ Osgrp(G) be a non-empty set of open subgroups satisfying (F1 ),
(F2 ) and (F3 ). A simplicial G-complex Σ will be said to be F-discrete, if stabG (x) ∈
F for all x ∈ Σ0 . Thus, by (F2 ), for an F-discrete simplicial G-complex one has
stabG (ω) ∈ F and, by (F3 ), stabG {ω} ∈ F for all ω ∈ Σ. This property has the
following consequence.
Fact 6.1. Let G be topological group of type OS, and let F ⊆ Osgrp(G) be a nonempty set of open subgroups of G satisfying (F1 ), (F2 ) and (F3 ). Then for every
F-discrete simplicial G-complex Σ, its topological realization |Σ| (cf. §A.2) is an
F-discrete G-CW-complex.
Proof. The property of being a G-CW-complex is straightforward. For any point
z ∈ |Σ|, there exists a unique q-simplex ω ∈ Σ such that z is an interior point
of |Σ(ω)| (cf. Fact A.3). Hence stabG (ω) ⊆ stabG (z) ⊆ stabG {ω}, and thus
stabG (z) ∈ F by (F3 ).
6.5. Contractable F-discrete simplical G-complexes. The F-discrete simplical G-complex Σ will be said to be contractable, if |Σ| is contractable. But note
that we do not claim that |Σ| is G-homotopic to a point (cf. [32, Thm. 2.2]).
3In case that Σ = Σ(Γ) for a graph Γ (cf. Ex. A.2), then Σ is a G-tame simplicial G-complex
if, and only if, G acts without inversion of edges on the graph Γ.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
35
Example 6.2. Let G be a topological group of type OS, and let F ⊆ Osgrp(G) be
a non-empty set of open subgroups satisfying (F1 ), (F2 ) and (F3 ). Let A ∈ F, and
put Ω(A) = Σ[G/A] (cf. Ex. A.1). Then Ω(A) is an F-discrete simplical G-complex.
By Fact A.4, |Ω(A)| is contractable, i.e., Ω(A) is a contractable F-discrete simplicial
G-complex.
We define the simplicial F-dimension of G by
(6.5)
sdimF (G) = min({ n ∈ N0 | ∃ a contractable F-discrete
simplicial G-complex Σ: dim(Σ) = n } ∪ {∞})
(cf. (A.4)). For n ∈ N0 ∪ {∞} we call G to be of type sFn (F), if there exists
a contractable F-discrete simplicial G-complex Σ which is of type Fn (cf. §6.3).
Moreover, G will be said to be of type sF(F), if there exists a contractable F-discrete
simplicial G-complex Σ of type F∞ satisfying dim(Σ) < ∞.
6.6. The Bruhat-Tits property. The F-discrete simplicial G-complex Σ is said
to have the Bruhat-Tits property, if for all A ∈ F one has |Σ|A 6= ∅. For every point
z ∈ |Σ|A there exists a unique q-simplex ω(z) ∈ Σ such that z is contained in the
interior of |Σ(ω(z))| (cf. Fact A.3). Hence A ⊆ stabG (z) ⊆ stabG {ω(z)}.
6.7. Classes of open subgroups for t.d.l.c. groups. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group.
Obviously, the class of all open subgroups O = Osgrp(G) and the class C = CO(G)
of all compact open subgroups satisfy the conditions (F1 ), (F2 ) and (F3 ). The same
is true for
(6.6)
vN = { O ∈ Osgrp(G) | ∃ U ⊆ O, U open and nested, |O : U| < ∞ },
the class of all virtually nested open subgroups of G (cf. §5.6).
Proposition 6.3. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. Then vN satisfies the conditions (F1 ),
(F2 ) and (F3 ).
Proof. Obviously, vN satisfies (F1 ) and (F3 ). Let
S O ∈ vN, and let U ⊆ O be an
open, nested subgroup of finite index, i.e., U = k≥0 Uk , Uk ⊆ Uk+1 , Uk ∈ CO(G).
Since |O : U| < ∞, we may also assume that U is normal in O. Let V ∈ vN. Then
V ∩ U is a nested open subgroup of G. Moreover, as V ∩ U = ker(V → O/U), one
has that |V : V ∩ U| < ∞. Hence vN satisfies (F2 ) as well.
Remark 6.4. The proof of Proposition 5.8 show also that N - the class of all nested
open subgroups of a t.d.l.c. group G - satisfies the conditions (F1 ) and (F2 ).
Remark 6.5. It is a remarkable fact, that although the Higman-Thompson groups
Fn,r , Tn,r , Gn,r are not of finite cohomological dimension, they still satisfy the
FP∞ -condition (cf. [15]). The Neretin group Nn,r of spheromorphism of a regular
rooted tree Tn,r can be seen as a t.d.l.c. analogue of the Higman-Thompson groups
(cf. Remark 3.11). In particular, this group has a factorization
(6.7)
Nn,r = O · Fn,r ,
O ∩ Fn,r = {1},
where Fn,r is a discrete subgroup isomorphic to the Richard Thompson group Fn,r
and O is a nested open subgroup of Nn,r . Hence the following questions arise.
Question 3. Is Nn,r of type sF(N)∞ or even of type sF(C)∞ ?
Question 4. Does there exist an E N (Nn,r )-space which is of type F∞ ?
36
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
The finiteness conditions we discussed in subsection §6.5 for C-discrete simplicial
G-complexes for a t.d.l.c. group G have the following consequence for its cohomological finiteness conditions.
Proposition 6.6. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group. Then one has the following.
(a) sdimC (G) ≥ cdQ (G).
(b) Let n ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}. If G is of type sFn (C), then G is of type FPn .
(c) If G is of type sF(C), then G is of type FP.
Proof. Let Σ be a C-discrete simplicial G-complex, let ω = {x0 , . . . , xq } ∈ Σq , and
e q (cf. (A.8)). Then stabG {ω} is acting on {±ω}, i.e., one
let ω = x0 ∧ · · · ∧ xq ∈ Σ
has a continuous group homomorphism
(6.8)
sgnω : stabG {ω} −→ {±1}.
Let Qω denote the 1-dimensional rational discrete left stabG {ω}-module associated
to sgnω , i.e., for g ∈ stabG {ω} and z ∈ Qω one has g · z = sgnω (g) · z. Thus if
Rq ⊆ Σq is a set of representatives for the G-orbits on Σq , one has an isomorphism
`
(6.9)
Cq (Σ) ≃ ω∈Rq indG
stabG {ω} (Qω )
of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules (cf. §A.3). In particular, Cq (Σ) is a projective
rational discrete left Q[G]-module.
If Σ is contractable, one has H0 (|Σ|, Q) ≃ Q and Hk (|Σ|, Q) = 0 for k 6= 0. Hence
(C• (Σ), ∂• ) is a projective resolution of the rational discrete left Q[G]-module Q
(cf. Fact A.6). In particular, cdQ (G) ≤ dim(Σ). This yields (a).
If Σ is contractable and of type Fn , n ∈ N0 ∪ {∞}, then, by (6.9), Ck (Σ) is a
finitely generated projective rational discrete left Q[G]-module for 0 ≤ k ≤ n. This
yields (b). Part (c) follows by similar arguments.
6.8. Simplicial t.d.l.c. rational duality groups. As in the discrete case it is
possible to detect from a group action that a t.d.l.c. group G is indeed a rational
duality group.
Theorem 6.7. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let Σ be a C-discrete simplicial
G-complex such that
(D1 ) Σ is contractable;
(D2 ) dim(Σ) < ∞ and Σ is of type F∞ ;
(D3 ) Σ is locally finite.
Then d = cdQ (G) < dim(Σ) and one has
(6.10)
×
DG = Hcd (|Σ|, Q) ⊗ Q(∆).
In particular, if
(D4 ) Hck (|Σ|, Q) = 0 for k 6= d,
then G is a t.d.l.c. rational duality group of dimension d.
Proof. By (D1 ), (C• (Σ), ∂• ) is a projective resolution of Q in Q[G] dis, and by (D2 ),
Cq (Σ) is a finitely generated projective rational discrete Q[G]-modules for all q ≥ 0.
As Σ is locally finite by (D3 ), ∂q : Cq (Σ) → Cq−1 (Σ), q ≥ 1, has an adjoint map
e ∗ ] → Q[Σ
e ∗ ], where one has to replace Σ
e 0 by Σ
e ± (cf. §A.5). Moreover,
∂q∗ : Q[Σ
q−1
q
0
(6.11)
∨
eq
Σ
∗
eq]
: Cq (Σ)⊙ −→ Q[Σ
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
37
is an isomorphism (cf. Prop. 4.16), and one has the commutative diagram
(6.12)
∨
eq
Σ
Cq (Σ)⊙
/ Q[Σ
e ∗]
q
Ccq (Σ)
∂∗
q+1
⊙
∂q+1
∨
e
Σ
Cq+1 (Σ)⊙
q+1
e ∗q+1 ]
/ Q[Σ
ðq
Ccq+1 (Σ)
(cf. Prop. 4.17). In particular, one obtains canonical isomorphisms (cf. Fact A.7)
dHk (G, Cc (G)) ≃ Hck (|Σ|, Q)×
(6.13)
of rational discrete right Q[G]-modules, and non-canonical isomorphisms
×
(6.14)
dHk (G, Bi(G)) ≃ Hck (|Σ|, Q) ⊗ Q(∆)
of rational discrete left Q[G]-modules (cf. Remark 4.13). In particular, as G is of
type FP (cf. Prop. 6.6(c)), one has
(6.15)
cdQ (G) = max{ k ∈ N0 | Hck (|Σ|, Q) 6= 0 }
(cf. Prop. 4.7). Thus for d = cdQ (G) one has an isomorphism
(6.16)
×
DG = Hcd (|Σ|, Q) ⊗ Q(∆).
This yields the claim.
A t.d.l.c. group G admitting a C-discrete simplicial G-complex Σ satisfying (Dj ),
1 ≤ j ≤ 4, will be called a simplicial t.d.l.c. rational duality group. It should be
mentioned that the dimension of Σ as simplicial complex does not have to coincide
with d = cdQ (G).
6.9. Universal C-discrete simplicial G-complexes. Let Σ be a C-discrete simplical G-complex, and let δ : |Σ| × |Σ| → R+
0 be a G-invariant metric on its topological realization. Then (Σ, δ) is called a C-discrete CAT(0) simplicial G-complex,
if
(E1 ) (|Σ|, δ) is a complete CAT(0)-space4,
(E2 ) Σ is G-tame.
Note that property (E1 ) implies that |Σ| is contractable (cf. [2, Prop. 11.7]). Let
O be a compact open subgroup of G. By hypothesis, any orbit O · x, x ∈ |Σ|,
is finite and thus in particular bounded. In particular, O has a fixed point z in
|Σ| (cf. [2, Thm. 11.23]). Let ω(z) ∈ Σ denote the unique simplex such that
z is contained in the interior of ω(z) (cf. Fact A.3). Then, by property (E2 ),
O ⊆ stabG (z) = stabG {ω(z)} = stabG (ω(z)), i.e., Σ has the Bruhat-Tits property
(cf. §6.6). By property (E2 ), ΣO is a simplicial subcomplex of Σ, and, by (E1 ),
(|ΣO |, δ) is a complete CAT(0)-space. In particular, |ΣO | is contractable. This
shows the following.
Proposition 6.8. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let Σ be a C-discrete CAT(0)
simplical G-complex. Then |Σ| is an E C (G)-space.
4For details on CAT(0)-spaces see [13].
38
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
6.10. Compactly generated t.d.l.c. groups of rational discrete cohomological dimension 1. Let G be a compactly generated t.d.l.c. group satisfying
cdQ (G) = 1. Then G is of type FP (cf. Thm. 5.3). As G is not compact (cf.
Prop. 3.7(a)), one has
(6.17)
dH0 (G, Bi(G)) = HomG (Q, Bi(G)) = 0
(cf. (4.21)). Hence G is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group.
Suppose that Π = π1 (A, Λ, Ξ) is the fundamental group of a finite graph of
profinite groups (A, Λ), i.e., Λ is a finite connected graph. Moreover, Π acts on the
tree T = T (A, Λ, Ξ, E + ) without inversion of edges. L We also assume that Π is
not compact. Then cdQ (G) = 1 (cf. Prop. 5.6). Hence the simplicial version of the
tree T - which we will denote by the same symbol - has the following properties:
(1) T is a locally finite simplicial complex of dimension 1;
(2) T is a C-discrete simplicial Π-complex;
(3) Π has finitely many orbits on the simplicial complex T , i.e., T is of type
F∞ ;
(4) T is Π-tame;
(5) the standard metric δ : |T | × |T | → R+
0 gives (|T |, δ) the structure of a
complete CAT(0)-space.
(6) Hc0 (|T |, Q) = 0.
Hence (1), (2), (3) and (5) imply that Π is a simplicial t.d.l.c. duality group.
Moreover, by Theorem 6.7, one has
(6.18)
×
DΠ ≃ Hc1 (|T |, Q) ⊗ Q(∆).
From (4) and (5) one concludes that T is a C-discrete CAT(0)-simplicial Π-complex,
and thus an E C (Π)-space (cf. Prop. 6.8).
6.11. Algebraic groups defined over a non-discrete, non-archimedean local field. Let K be a non-discrete non-archimedean local field5 with residue field
F; in particular, F is finite. Let G be a semi-simple, simply-connected algebraic
group defined over K, and let G(K) denote the group of K-rational points. In
particular, G(K) carries naturally the structure of a t.d.l.c. group. Suppose that
G(K) is not compact. Then G(K) has a type preserving action on an affine building
(C, S), the Bruhat-Tits building, where (W, S) is an affine Coxeter group. Moreover, d = |S| − 1 coincides with the algebraic K-rank of G. For further details see
[17], [18], [46] and [50].
The Tits realization Σ(C, S) of the Bruhat-Tits building (C, S) is a discrete simplicial G(K)-complex of dimension d with the following properties:
(1) For ω ∈ Σ(C, S) its stabilizer stabG(K) (ω) is a parahoric subgroup and
hence compact, i.e., Σ(C, S) is a C-discrete simplicial G(K)-complex.
(2) G(K) has finitely many orbits on Σ(C, S), i.e., Σ(C, S) is of type F∞ .
(3) As G(K) acts type preserving, Σ(C, S) is G(K)-tame.
(4) Σ(C, S) is locally finite.
5By a local field we understand a non-discrete locally compact field. Such a field comes
equipped with a valuation v, and, in case that v is non-archimedean, v is also discrete. Hence
such a field is either isomorphic to a finite extension of the p-adic numbers Qp or isomorphic to a
Laurent power series ring Fq [t−1 , t]] for some finite field Fq .
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
39
(5) There exists a G(K)-invariant metric δ : |Σ(C, S)| × |Σ(C, S)| → R+
0 making
(|Σ(C, S)|, δ) a complete CAT(0)-space (cf. [2, Thm. 11.16]). In particular,
|Σ(C, S)| is contractable.
(6) By a theorem of A. Borel and J-P. Serre, one has Hck (|Σ(C, S)|, Q) = 0 for
k 6= d and Hcd (|Σ(C, S)|, Q) 6= 0 (cf. [10], [12]).
From these properties one concludes the following.
Theorem 6.9. Let G be a semi-simple, simply-connected algebraic group defined
over the non-discrete non-archimedean local field K.
(a) The topological realization |Σ(C, S)| of the Tits realization of the affine
building (C, S) is an E C (G(K))-space.
(b) G(K) is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group of dimension rk(G) = dim(Σ(C, S)).
(c) For d = cdQ (G(K)) one has × DG(K) ≃ Hcd (|Σ(C, S)|, Q).
Proof. (a) is a direct consequence of the properties (1), (3), (5) and Proposition 6.8.
(b) and (c) follow from the properties (1), (2), (4), (5), (6) and Theorem 6.7.
Note that G(K) is in particular a simplicial t.d.l.c. rational duality group and
(6.19)
dimC (G(K)) = sdimC (G(K)) = cdQ (G(K)).
6.12. Topological Kac-Moody groups. Let F be a finite field, and let G(F)
denote the rational points of an almost split Kac-Moody group defined over F (cf.
[38, 12.6.3]) with infinite Weyl group (W, S). Such a group acts naturally on a twin
building Ξ (cf. [40, 1.A]). Let Σ(Ξ+ ) denote the Davis-Moussang realization of the
positive part of Ξ (cf. [24], [36]). In particular,
(1) Σ(Ξ+ ) is a locally finite simplicial complex of finite dimension.
Moreover, G(F) is acting on Ξ+ and hence on Σ(Ξ+ ), and thus one has a homomorphism of groups π : G(F) → Aut(Σ(Ξ+ )). As Σ(Ξ+ ) is locally finite, Aut(Σ(Ξ+ ))
carries naturally the structure of a t.d.l.c. group. The closure Ḡ(F) of im(π) is
called the topological Kac-Moody group associate to G(F) (cf. [40, 1.B and 1.C]).
By construction,
(2) Σ(Ξ+ ) is a C-discrete Ḡ(F)-simplicial complex.
Indeed, if F is of positive characteristic p, then stabḠ(F) (ω) is a virtual pro-p group
for all ω ∈ Σ(Ξ+ ) (cf. [40, p. 198, Theorem]). Let G(F)◦ denote the subgroup of
G(F) which elements are type preserving on Ξ, and let Ḡ(F)◦ denote the closure
of π(G(F)◦ ). Then Ḡ(F)◦ is open and of finite index in Ḡ(F). As G(F)◦ is type
preserving, one concludes that
(3) Σ(Ξ+ ) is Ḡ(F)◦ -tame.
Since G(F) (and thus Ḡ(F)) acts δ-2-transitive on chambers of Ξ, one has that
(4) Σ(Ξ+ ) is a C-discrete simplicial Ḡ(F)◦ -complex of type F∞ (cf. §6.3).
By a remarkable result of M.W. Davis (cf. [24]) the topological realization |Σ(Ξ+ )|
admits a Ḡ(F)◦ -invariant CAT(0)-metric d : |Σ(Ξ+ )| × |Σ(Ξ+ )| → R+
0 (cf. [2,
Thm. 12.66]). Hence Proposition 6.8 implies the following.
Theorem 6.10. Let F be a finite field, let G(F) denote the rational points of an
almost split Kac-Moody group defined over F with infinite Weyl group, and let Ḡ(F)
be the associated topological Kac-Moody group. Then the topological realization
|Σ(Ξ+ )| of the David-Moussang realization Σ(Ξ+ ) is an E C (Ḡ(F)◦ )-space.
40
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
Note that by Davis’ theorem,
(5) Σ(Ξ+ ) is a contractable C-discrete simplicial Ḡ(F)-complex.
Hence Theorem 6.7 implies that
(6.20)
d = cdQ (Ḡ(F)) = cdQ (Ḡ(F)◦ ) ≤ dim(Σ(Ξ+ )) < ∞,
Ḡ(F) is of type FP, and since Ḡ(F) is unimodular (cf. [39, p. 811, Thm.(i)]),
×
(6.21)
DḠ(F) ≃ Hcd (|Σ(Ξ+ )|, Q).
Moreover, by (6.15),
(6.22)
cdQ (Ḡ(F)) = max{ k ≥ 0 | Hck (|Σ(Ξ+ )|, Q) 6= 0 }.
However, Ḡ(F) may or may not be a rational t.d.l.c. duality group (cf. Remark 6.12
and 6.13). The cohomology with compact support of |Σ(Ξ+ )| with coefficients in
Z was computed in [26]. In more detail,
a
bT (Ξ+ ),
Hck (|Σ(Ξ+ )|, Z) =
(6.23)
H k (K, K S−T ) ⊗ A
T ∈S
and a similar formula holds for the Davis realization of the Coxeter complex Σ(C)
associated to (W, S) (cf. [25]), i.e.,
a
bT (C),
Hck (|Σ(C)|, Z) =
(6.24)
H k (K, K S−T ) ⊗ A
T ∈S
Here S denotes the set of non-trivial spherical subsets of S, and K is a simplicial
complex associated to (W, S) build up from the spherical subsets of S. A more
bT (Ξ+ ) and A
bT (C) yields the following.
detailed analysis of the coeffcient modules A
Theorem 6.11. Let F be a finite field, let G(F) denote the rational points of an
almost split Kac-Moody group defined over F with infinite Weyl group (W, S), and
let Ḡ(F) be the associated topological Kac-Moody group. Then
(6.25)
cdQ (Ḡ(F)◦ ) = cdQ (W ).
Moreover, Ḡ(F)◦ (and thus Ḡ(F)) is a rational t.d.l.c. duality group if, and only if,
W is a rational discrete duality group.
bT (Ξ+ ) and A
bT (C) are free Z-modules. Moreover, for T ∈ S one
Proof. Note that A
bT (C) 6= 0 and A
bT (Ξ+ ) 6= 0 (cf. [26, §6, p. 570, Remark and Definition 7.4]).
has A
As the abelian groups H k (K, K S−T ) are finitely generated, the universal coefficient
theorem implies that
cdQ (W ) = max{ k ≥ 0 | ∃ T ∈ S : H k (K, K S−T ) is not torsion }
= max{ k ≥ 0 | Hck (|Σ(Ξ+ )|, Q) 6= 0 }
(6.26)
= cdQ (Ḡ(F))
(cf. Thm. 6.7). Let d = cdQ (W ) = cdQ (Ḡ(F)). Then W is a rational duality group
if, and only if, H k (K, K ST ) is a torsion group for all T ∈ S and all k 6= d. By
(6.24), this is equivalent to Hck (|Σ(Ξ+ )|, Q) = 0 for all k 6= d. Thus Theorem 6.7
yields the claim.
Remark 6.12. Let F be a finite field, let G(F) denote the rational points of a split
Kac-Moody group defined over F, and let Ḡ(F) be the associated topological KacMoody group. Suppose further that
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
41
(1) the associated generalized Cartan matrix is symmetrizable, and that
(2) the associated Weyl group (W, S) is hyperbolic (cf. [28, §6.8]).
Condition (2) implies that W is a lattice in the real Lie group O(n, 1), |S| = n + 1
(cf. [28, p. 140, and the references therein]). Moreover, as W is the Weyl group
of a (split) Kac-Moody Lie algebra with property (1), the Tits representation of
the Weyl group W is integral (cf. [19, §16.2]). Hence W is an arithmetic lattice
in O(n, 1). Thus by A. Borel’s and J-P. Serre’s theorem (cf. [11]), W is a virtual
duality group, and thus, in particular, a rational duality group. Hence Theorem 6.11
implies that Ḡ(F) is a rational discrete t.d.l.c. duality group.
Remark 6.13. Consider the Coxeter group (W, S) associated to the Coxeter diagram
•✤✷
☞☞✤ ✷✷✷
☞
✷
☞
☞☞ ✤ ∞ ✷✷✷
☞
✤
☞
✷✷
✤
☞☞
✷✷
☞
☞
✷✷
✤▼
☞
•
(6.27)
q
✷
☞
▼
▼∞ ✷✷
☞☞ ∞q q
▼
☞
✷
q
☞q
▼ ✷✷
▼•
☞☞
•q
`
e2 ) W (A1 ). In particular, cdQ (W ) = 2. By Stallings’ decomposiThen W ≃ W (A
tion theorem (cf. [44]), H 1 (W, Q[W ]) 6= 0. Thus W is not a rational duality group.
Let G(F) denote the rational points of a split Kac-Moody group defined over F
with associated Coxeter group is (W, S), and let Ḡ(F) be the associated topological
Kac-Moody group. Then Theorem 6.11 implies, that Ḡ(F) is of rational cohomological dimension 2, but that Ḡ(F) is not a rational t.d.l.c. duality group, i.e.,
dH1 (Ḡ(F), Bi(Ḡ(F)) 6= 0. The t.d.l.c. version of Stalling’s decomposition theorem
established in [21] implies that Ḡ(F) can be decomposed non-trivially as a free product with amalgamation in a compact open subgroup (where one factor is a compact
open subgroup as well), or as an HNN-extension with amalgamation in a compact
open subgroup. It would be interesting to understand how this decomposition is
related to the root datum of G(F).
We close this section with a question which is motivated by (6.19).
Question 5. For which topological Kac-Moody groups Ḡ(F), F a finite field, does
dimC (Ḡ(F)) = cdQ (Ḡ(F)) hold (cf. §6.3)?
7. The Euler-Poincaré characteristic
of a unimodular t.d.l.c. group of type FP
In this subsection we indicate how one can associate to any unimodular t.d.l.c.
group G of type FP an Euler-Poincaré characteristic
(7.1)
χ(G) ∈ h(G) = Q · µO ,
where O is a compact open subgroup, and µO denotes the left invariant Haar
measure on G satisfying µO (O) = 1. If h ∈ Q+ · µO we simply write h > 0;
similarly h < 0 shall indicate that h ∈ Q− · µO .
In some particular cases discussed in §6.10 and §6.11 it will be possible to calculate the Euler-Poincaré characteristic χ(G) explicitly. It is quite likely, that similar
calculation can be done also for the examples decribed in §6.12. However, one of the
42
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
most interesting question from our perspective which was our original motivation
to introduce and study this notion we were not able to answer.
Question 6. Let G be a compactly generated t.d.l.c. group satisfying cdQ (G) = 1.
Does this imply that χ(G) ≤ 0?
An affirmative answer of Question 6 would resolve the problem of accessibility for
compactly generated t.d.l.c. groups of rational discrete cohomological dimension 1
in analogy to the discrete case (cf. [30]).
7.1. The Hattori-Stallings rank of a finitely generated projective rational
discrete Q[G]-module. Let G be a t.d.l.c. group, and let P be a finitely generated
projective rational discrete Q[G]-module. The evaluation map
(7.2)
evP : HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗Q P → Bi(G),
φ ∈ HomG (P, Bi(G)),
evP (φ ⊗ p) = φ(p),
p ∈ P,
induces a mapping evP : HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗G P → Bi(G) such that the diagram
(7.3)
HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗Q P
/ HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗G P
evP
evP
/ Bi(G)
Bi(G)
commutes, where the horizontal maps are the canonical ones and Bi(G) is as defined
in §4.8. Then - provided that G is unimodular - one has a map
(7.4)
ρP : HomG (P, P )
−1
ζP,P
/ HomG (P, Bi(G)) ⊗G P
evP
/ Bi(G)
tr
/ h(G).
(cf. Prop. 4.6, Prop. 4.14). The value rP = ρP (idP ) ∈ h(G) will be called the
Hattori-Stallings rank of P .
Proposition 7.1. Let G be a unimodular t.d.l.c. group, and let O ⊆ G be a
compact open subgroup. Then rQ[G/O] = µO .
Proof. Let ηO : Q[G/O] → Bi(G) be the canonical embedding (cf. (4.31)). Then
jO (ηO ) = O ∈ O\G (cf. (4.34)). Hence,
(7.5)
(jO ⊗G idQ[G/O] )(ηO ⊗ O) = O ⊗G O
and
O
φ−1
Q[G/O],O (O ⊗G O) = O ∈ Q[G/O] .
(7.6)
Under the Eckmann-Shapiro isomorphism α: Q[G/O]O → HomG (Q[G/O], Q[G/O])
the element O is mapped to idQ[G/O] . Hence, by (4.35),
(7.7)
ζQ[G/O],Q[G/O](ηO ⊗G O) = idQ[G/O] ,
−1
(idQ[G/O] )) = O, where O denotes the canonical image
and evQ[G/O] (ζQ[G/O],Q[G/O]
of O in Bi(G). Thus, by the definition of tr : Bi(G) → h(G) (cf. (4.77)),
(7.8)
and this yields the claim.
rQ[G/O] = tr(O) = µO
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
43
Remark 7.2. Let G be a unimodular t.d.l.c. group, and let P ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) be
finitely generated and projective. In [22] it is shown, that rP ≥ 0, and rP = 0 if,
and only if, P = 0.
7.2. The Euler-Poincaré characteristic. Let G be a unimodular t.d.l.c. group,
and let P1 , P2 ∈ ob(Q[G] dis) be finitely generated and projective. Then, by (7.4),
one has ρP1 ⊕P2 (idP1 ⊕P2 ) = ρP1 (idP1 ) + ρP2 (idP2 ), i.e.,
rP1 ⊕P2 = rP1 + rP2 .
(7.9)
Let (P• , δ• ) be a finite projective resolution of Q in Q[G] dis, i.e., there exists N ≥ 0
such that Pk = 0 for k > N , and Pk is finitely generated for all k ≥ 0. From the
identity (7.10) one concludes that the value
P
(7.10)
χ(G) = k≥0 (−1)k · rPk ∈ h(G)
is independent from the choice of the projective resolution (P• , δ• ) (cf. [45, Proposition 4.1]) for a similar argument). We will call χ(G) the Euler-Poincaré characteristic of G.
7.3. Examples.
7.3.1. Compact t.d.l.c. groups. Let O be a compact t.d.l.c. group. Then Proposition 7.1 implies that χ(G) = rQ = µO .
7.3.2. Fundamental groups of finite graphs of profinite groups. Let (A, Λ) be a finite
graph of profinite groups. Assume further that Π = π1 (A, Λ, x0 ) is unimodular6.
Then, by Proposition 7.1,
X
X
µAv −
µAe .
(7.11)
χ(Π) =
v∈V(Λ)
e∈E + (Λ)
In particular, if (A, Λ) is a finite graph of finite groups one obtains
X
X
1
1
(7.12)
χ(Π) =
· µ = χΠ · µ{1} ,
−
|Av |
|Ae |
+
v∈V(Λ)
e∈E (Λ)
where χΠ denotes the Euler characteristic of the discrete group Π (cf. [41, §II.2.6,
Ex. 3]). One has the following:
Proposition 7.3. Let (A, Λ) be a finite graph of profinite groups, such that Π =
π1 (A, Λ, x0 ) is unimodular and non-compact. Then χ(Π) ≤ 0.
Proof. Suppose that one of the open embeddings αe : Ae → At(e) is surjective.
Then removing the edge e form Λ, idetifying t(e) with o(e) and taking the induced
graph of profinite groups (A′ , Λ′ ) does not change the fundamental group, i.e., one
has a topological isomorphism π1 (A, Λ, x0 ) ≃ π1 (A′ , Λ′ , x′0 ). Thus we may assume
that the finite graph of profinite groups has the property that none of the injections
αe : Ae → At(e) is surjective. Since Π is not compact, Λ cannot be a single vertex.
Thus, as |At(e) : αe (Ae )| ≥ 2 one has µAe ≥ µAt(e) + µAo(e) for any edge e ∈ E(Λ).
Choosing a maximal subtree of Λ then yields the claim.
6For a given finite graph of profinite groups it is possible to decide when Π is unimodular.
However, the complexity of this problem will depend on the rank of H 1 (|Λ|, Z). E.g., if Λ is a
finite tree, then Π will be unimodular.
44
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
7.3.3. The automorphism group of a locally finite regular tree. Let Td+1 be a (d+1)regular tree, 1 ≤ d < ∞, and let G = Aut(Td+1 )◦ denote the group of automorphism
not inverting the orientation of edges. Then, as G is the fundamental group of a
finite graph of profinite groups based on a tree with 2 vertices, G is unimodular.
One concludes from Bass-Serre theory and §7.3.2 that
χ(Aut(Td+1 )◦ ) =
(7.13)
1−d
· µG e ,
1+d
where Ge is the stabilizer of an edge. Moreover, χ(Aut(Td+1 )◦ ) < 0.
7.3.4. Chevalley groups over non-discrete non-archimedean local fields. Let X be a
simply-connected simple Chevalley group scheme, and let K be a non-archimedean
local field with finite residue field F. Put q = |F|. Let W be the finite (or spherical)
f denote the associated affine Weyl group
Weyl group associated to X, and let W
f . Let n =
associated to W . We also fix a Coxeter generating system ∆ of W
f
rk(W ) = rk(W ) − 1 = |∆| − 1 denote the rank of W as Coxeter group. It is wellknown that X(K) modulo its center is simple. In particular, X(K) is a unimodular
t.d.l.c. group.
Let Σ be the affine building associated to X(K) (cf. §6.11). The stablizer
Iw = stabX(K) (ω) of a simplex ω ∈ Σn of maximal dimension is also called a
Iwahori subgroup of X(K). Let Σ(ω) = { ̟ ∈ Σ | ̟ ⊆ ω } = P(ω) \ {∅}. For
̟ ∈ Σ(ω) let P̟ = stabX(K) (̟) denote the parahoric subgroup associated to ̟,
i.e., Pω = Iw. Then
X
(−1)|̟| · µP̟ ,
(7.14)
χ(X(K)) =
̟∈Σ(ω)
where |̟| is the degree of ̟, i.e., ̟ ∈ Σ|̟| (cf. §6.11). Any parahoric subgroup
P̟ , ̟ ∈ Σ(ω), corresponds to a unique proper subset ∆(̟) of ∆ of cardinality
|ω| − |̟|, i.e., ∆(ω) = ∅. Moreover,
|P̟ : Iw| = pW (∆(̟)) (q),
(7.15)
where pW (∆(̟)) (t) ∈ Z[t] is the Poincaré polynomial associated to the finite Weyl
group W (∆(̟)). Thus, by [28, §5.12, Proposition], one obtains that
χ(X(K)) =
X
̟∈Σ(ω)
(7.16)
(−1)|̟|
· µIw
|P̟ : Iw|
= (−1)n+1 ·
X (−1)|I|−1
(−1)n+1
· µIw =
· µIw .
pW (I) (q)
pW
f (q)
I⊆∆
I6=∆
Q
mi
), where mi = di − 1
By R. Bott’s theorem, one has pW
f (t) = pW (t)/
1≤i≤n (1 − t
are the exponents of W (cf. [28, §8.9, Theorem]). Thus χ(X(K)) can be rewritten
as
(7.17)
χ(X(K)) = −
Y
1
·
(q mi − 1) · µIw .
pW (q)
1≤i≤n
In particular, χ(X(K)) < 0.
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
45
Remark 7.4. One may speculate whether in a situation which is controlled by
geometry the Euler-Poincaré characteristic should be related to a meromorphic ζfunction evaluated in −1. There are some phenomenon supporting this idea which
arise even in a completely different context (cf. [16]). Indeed, using Hecke algebras
one may define a formal Dirichlet series ζG,O (s) for certain t.d.l.c. groups G and
any compact open subgroup O of such a group G. It turns out that for the example
discussed in §7.3.4 one obtains χ(X(K)) = (−1)n+1 · ζX(K),Iw (−1)−1 · µIw (cf. [22]).
Nevertheless, further investigations seem necessary in order to shed light on such a
possible connection.
We close the discussion of the Euler-Poincaré characteristic with a question which
is motivated by the examples discussed in §7.3.2 and §7.3.4.
Question 7. Suppose that G is a t.d.l.c. group admitting a C-discrete simplicial
G-complex Σ such that
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
dim(Σ) = cdQ (G) < ∞;
Σ is of type F∞ ;
Σ is locally finite;
Σ is G-tame;
|Σ| admits a G-invariant metric δ : |Σ| × |Σ| → R+
0 making (|Σ|, δ) a complete CAT(0)-space (cf. §6.9).
What further condition ensures that χ(G) ≤ 0?
The most trivial examples (cf. §7.3.1) show that the conditions (1)-(5) are not
sufficient (for G compact Σ can be chosen to consist of 1 point).
Appendix A. Simplicial complexes
A.1. Simplicial complexes. A simplicial complex Σ is a non-empty set of nontrivial finite subsets of a set X with the property that if B ∈ Σ and
F A ⊆ B then
A ∈ Σ. Any simplicial complex Σ carries a canonical grading Σ = q≥0 Σq , where
(A.1)
Σq = { A ∈ Σ | card(A) = q + 1 }.
Example A.1. Let X be a set, and let Σ[X] ⊆ P(X) \ {∅} denote the set of all
non-trivial finite subsets of X. Then Σ[X] is a simplicial complex - the simplicial
complex generated by X.
Example A.2. Let Γ = (V(Γ), E(Γ)) be a combinatorial graph (cf. §5.4). Then
Σ(Γ) given by Σ0 (Γ) = V(Γ) and Σ1 (Γ) = { {o(e), t(e)} | e ∈ E(Γ) } is a simplicial
complex - the simplicial complex associated with the graph Γ.
In a simplicial complex Σ and n ≥ 0 the subset
(A.2)
Σ(n) = { A ∈ Σ | card(A) ≤ n + 1 }
is again simplicial subcomplex of Σ - the n-skeleton of Σ. A subset Y ⊆ Σ0 defines
a simplicial subcomplex
(A.3)
Σ(Y ) = { C ∈ Σ | C ⊆ Y }.
For a simplicial complex Σ one defines the dimension by
(A.4)
dim(Σ) = min({ q ∈ N0 | Σq+1 = ∅ } ∪ {∞}).
46
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
In particular, dim(Σ(X)) = card(X) − 1. A simplicial complex of dimension 0
is just a set, while simplicial complexes of dimension 1 are unoriented graphs (cf.
Ex. A.2). For A ∈ Σq one defines the set of neighbours NΣ (A) of A by
NΣ (A) = { B ∈ Σq+1 | A ⊂ B }.
(A.5)
Moreover, Σ is called locally finite if for all A ∈ Σq one has card(NΣ (A)) < ∞.
A.2. The topological realization of a simplicial complex. With any simplicial complex Σ ⊆ P(X) \ {∅} one can associate a topological space |Σ| - the
topological realization of Σ - which is a CW-complex. The space |Σ| can be constructed as follows: Let V = R[X] denote the free R-vector space over the set X,
and for A ∈ Σq , A = { a0 , . . . , aq }, put
Pq
Pq
(A.6)
|A| = { j=0 tj · aj | 0 ≤ tj ≤ 1,
j=0 tj = 1 } ⊂ R[X].
S
Then |Σ| = A∈Σ |A| ⊂ R[X], and |Σ| carries the weak topology with respect to
the embeddings iA : |A| → |Σ|, where |A| ⊂ R[A] carries the induced topology (cf.
[43, §3.1]). By construction, one has the following property.
Fact A.3. Let Σ be a simplical complex, and let z ∈ |Σ|. Then there exists a unique
simplex A ∈ Σ such that z is an interior point of |Σ(A)| ⊆ |Σ|.
The topological space |Σ| has the following well-known property.
Fact A.4. Let Σ be a simplicial complex, and let C be a compact subspace of |Σ|.
Then there exists a finite subset Y ⊆ Σ1 such that C ⊆ |Σ(Y )|.
Proof. (cf. [27, p. 520, Prop. A.1]).
The just mentioned property has the following consequence.
Fact A.5. Let X be a non empty set. Then |Σ[X]| is contractable.
Proof. Put Σ = Σ[X]. As |Σ| is a connected CW-complex, one concludes from
Whitehead’s theorem (cf. [27,SThm. 4.5]) that it suffices to show that πi (|Σ|, x0 ) = 1
for all i ≥ 1. Note that Σ = A∈Px Σ(A), where
0
(A.7)
Px0 = { A ⊆ X | x0 ∈ A, card(A) < ∞ }.
By Fact A.4, for any compact subset C of |Σ|, there exists a finite set A ∈ Px0 such
that C ⊆ |Σ(A)|. Hence πi (|Σ|, x0 ) = limA∈P πi (|Σ(A)|, x0 ). As |Σ(A)| coincides
−→
x0
with the standard (card(A) − 1)-simplex, one has πi (|Σ(A)|, x0 ) = 1.
A.3. The chain complex of a simplicial complex. Let Σ ⊆ P(X) \ {∅} be a
simplicial complex. For q ≥ 0 put
e q = { x0 ∧ · · · ∧ xq | {x0 , . . . , xq } ∈ Σq } ⊂ Λq+1 (Q[X]),
(A.8)
Σ
where Λ• (Q[X]) denotes the exterior algebra of the free Q-vector space over the set
X, and define
e q ) ⊆ Λq+1 (Q[X]).
(A.9)
Cq (Σ) = span (Σ
Q
Then (C• (Σ), ∂• ), where
(A.10)
∂q (x0 ∧ · · · ∧ xq ) =
P
j
0≤j≤q (−1)
x0 ∧ · · · ∧ xj−1 ∧ xj+1 ∧ · · · ∧ xq
is a chain complex of Q-vector spaces - the rational chain complex of the simplicial
complex Σ (cf. [43, §4.1]). It has the following well-known property (cf. [43, §4.3,
Thm. 8]).
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
47
Fact A.6. Let Σ be a simplicial complex. Then one has a canonical isomorphism
(A.11)
H• (C• (Σ), ∂• ) ≃ H• (|Σ|, Q).
A.4. Cohomology with compact support. Let Σ ⊆ P(X) \ {∅} be a locally
finite simplicial complex. Put X ∗ = { x∗ | x ∈ X }, and think of X ∗ as a subset of
the Q-vector space Cc (X, Q), the functions from X to Q with finite support, i.e.,
for x, y ∈ X one has x∗ (y) = δx,y . Here δ.,. denotes Kronecker’s function. For q ≥ 0
put
(A.12)
and define
(A.13)
b q = { x∗ ∧ · · · ∧ x∗ | {x0 , . . . , xq } ∈ Σq } ⊂ Λq (Q[X ∗ ]),
Σ
0
q
b q ) ⊆ Λq (Q[X ∗ ]).
Ccq (Σ) = spanQ (Σ
By definition, for A ∈ Σq the set
(A.14)
IΣ (A) = { x ∈ Σ1 \ A | A ∪ {x} ∈ Σq+1 }
is finite. Then (Cc• (Σ), ð• ), where
(A.15)
ðq (x∗0 ∧ · · · ∧ x∗q ) =
P
z∈IΣ ({x0 ,...,xq })
z ∧ x∗0 ∧ · · · ∧ x∗q
b q , is a cochain complex. It has the following well-known property
x∗0 ∧ · · · ∧ x∗q ∈ Σ
(cf. [27, p. 242ff]).
Fact A.7. Let Σ be a locally finite simplicial complex. Then one has a canonical
isomorphism H • (Cc• (Σ), ð• ) ≃ Hc• (|Σ|, Q), where Hc• ( , Q) denotes cohomology
with compact support with coefficients in Q.
A.5. Signed sets. A set X together with a map ¯ : X → X satisfying x̄¯ = x and
x̄ 6= x for all x ∈ X will be called a signed set. A map of signed sets φ : X → Y is
a map satisfying φ(x̄) = φ(x) for all x ∈ X. Every signed set X defines a Q-vector
space
(A.16)
Q[X] = Q[X]/spanQ { x + x̄ | x ∈ X }.
For a signed set X let X ∗ = { x∗ | x ∈ X } denote the signed set satisfying x̄∗ = x∗ .
Then we may consider Q[X ∗ ] as a Q-subspace of Q[X]∗ = HomQ (Q[X], Q), i.e.,
if y = x,
1
∗
(A.17)
x (y) = −1 if y = x̄,
0
if y 6∈ {x, x̄}.
Any map of signed sets φ : X → Y defines a Q-linear map φQ : Q[X] → Q[Y ], but
it does not necessarily possess an adjoint map φ∗Q : Q[Y ∗ ] → Q[X ∗ ]. However, if φ
is proper, i.e., φ has finite fibres, then there exists a unique map φ∗Q satisfying
(A.18)
hv ∗ , φQ (u)iY = hφ∗Q (v), uiX ,
u ∈ Q[X], v ∈ Q[Y ∗ ],
where h., .iX and h., .iY denote the evaluation mappings, respectively. Let X + ⊂ X
and Y + ⊂ Y be a set of representative for the Z/2Z-orbits on X and Y , respectively.
For a map ψ : Q[X] → P
Q[Y ] and x ∈ Q[X] - the canonical image of x ∈ X + in
Q[X] - one has ψ(x) = y∈Y + λy (x) · y for λy (x) ∈ Q. Put
(A.19)
supp(ψ, x) = { y ∈ Y + | λy (x) 6= 0 }.
48
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
We call the map ψ : Q[X] → Q[Y ] proper, if for all y ∈ Y + the set
(A.20)
csupp(ψ, y) = { x ∈ X + | y ∈ supp(φ, x) }
is finite. It is straightforward to verify that the mapping ψ ∗ : Q[Y ∗ ] → Q[X ∗ ],
X
λy (x) · x∗ ,
y ∈Y+
(A.21)
ψ ∗ (y ∗ ) =
x∈csupp(ψ,y)
satisfies (A.18) and thus can be seen as the adjoint of ψ.
e q , q ≥ 1, are signed sets, and one has a
If Σ is a simplicial complex, then Σ
canonical isomorphism
e q ] ≃ Cq (Σ).
(A.22)
Q[Σ
e 0 by
The same applies also for q = 0 replacing Σ
e ± = { ±x0 | x0 ∈ Σ0 } ⊆ Λ1 (Q[Σ0 ]),
(A.23)
Σ
0
e ±]
Q[Σ
0
= C0 (Σ). Moreover, if Σ is locally finite, then ∂q : Cq (Σ) → Cq−1 (Σ) is
i.e.,
proper for q ≥ 2. By construction, one has for q ≥ 1 a canonical isomorphism
(A.24)
e ∗ ],
Ccq (Σ) ≃ Q[Σ
q
e ± )∗ ]. Moreover, ðq = ∂ ∗ .
and Cc0 (Σ) ≃ Q[(Σ
q+1
0
References
[1] H. Abels, Specker-Kompaktifizierungen von lokal kompakten topologischen Gruppen, Math.
Z. 135 (1973/74), 325–361. MR 0344375 (49 #9114)
[2] P. Abramenko and K. S. Brown, Buildings, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 248,
Springer, New York, 2008, Theory and applications. MR 2439729 (2009g:20055)
[3] T. Austin and C. C. Moore, Continuity properties of measurable group cohomology, Math.
Ann. 356 (2013), no. 3, 885–937. MR 3063901
[4] U. Baumgartner, B. Rémy, and G. A. Willis, Flat rank of automorphism groups of buildings,
Transform. Groups 12 (2007), no. 3, 413–436. MR 2356316 (2008j:22035)
[5] U. Baumgartner and G. A. Willis, The direction of an automorphism of a totally disconnected
locally compact group, Math. Z. 252 (2006), no. 2, 393–428. MR 2207803 (2007a:22005)
[6] D. J. Benson, Representations and cohomology. I, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 30, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991, Basic representation theory
of finite groups and associative algebras. MR 1110581 (92m:20005)
[7] M. Bestvina and N. Brady, Morse theory and finiteness properties of groups, Invent. Math.
129 (1997), no. 3, 445–470. MR 1465330 (98i:20039)
[8] R. Bieri, Homological dimension of discrete groups, Mathematics Department, Queen Mary
College, London, 1976, Queen Mary College Mathematics Notes. MR 0466344 (57 #6224)
[9] R. Bieri and B. Eckmann, Groups with homological duality generalizing Poincaré duality,
Invent. Math. 20 (1973), 103–124. MR 0340449 (49 #5204)
[10] A. Borel and J-P. Serre, Cohomologie à supports compacts des immeubles de Bruhat-Tits;
applications à la cohomologie des groupes S-arithmétiques, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B
272 (1971), A110–A113. MR 0274456 (43 #221)
[11] A. Borel and J.-P. Serre, Corners and arithmetic groups, Comment. Math. Helv. 48 (1973),
436–491, Avec un appendice: Arrondissement des variétés à coins, par A. Douady et L.
Hérault. MR 0387495 (52 #8337)
[12] A. Borel and J-P. Serre, Cohomologie d’immeubles et de groupes S-arithmétiques, Topology
15 (1976), no. 3, 211–232. MR 0447474 (56 #5786)
[13] M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger, Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Grundlehren der
Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 319,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. MR 1744486 (2000k:53038)
[14] K. S. Brown, Cohomology of groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 87, Springer-Verlag,
New York, 1982. MR 672956 (83k:20002)
RATIONAL DISCRETE COHOMOLOGY FOR T.D.L.C. GROUPS
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
49
, Finiteness properties of groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 44 (1987), no. 1-3, 45–75.
MR 885095 (88m:20110)
, The coset poset and probabilistic zeta function of a finite group, J. Algebra 225
(2000), no. 2, 989–1012. MR 1741574 (2000k:20082)
F. Bruhat and J. Tits, Groupes réductifs sur un corps local, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ.
Math. (1972), no. 41, 5–251. MR 0327923 (48 #6265)
, Groupes réductifs sur un corps local. II. Schémas en groupes. Existence d’une donnée
radicielle valuée, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1984), no. 60, 197–376. MR 756316
(86c:20042)
R. W. Carter, Lie algebras of finite and affine type, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 96, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005. MR 2188930 (2006i:17001)
I. Castellano, Stallings’ decomposition theorem for totally disconnected and locally compact
groups, PhD thesis, 2015.
, Stallings’ decomposition theorem for totally disconnected, locally compact groups,
preprint, 2015.
I. Castellano and Th. Weigel, Hecke algebras associated to totally disconnected, locally compact groups, preprint, 2015.
I. M. Chiswell, Exact sequences associated with a graph of groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 8
(1976), no. 1, 63–74. MR 0399296 (53 #3147)
M. W. Davis, Buildings are CAT(0), Geometry and cohomology in group theory (Durham,
1994), London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 252, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge,
1998, pp. 108–123. MR 1709955 (2000i:20068)
M. W. Davis, J. Dymara, T. Januszkiewicz, and B. Okun, Cohomology of Coxeter groups
with group ring coefficients. II, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6 (2006), 1289–1318 (electronic).
MR 2253447 (2007f:20068)
M.W. Davis, J. Dymara, T. Januszkiewicz, J. Meier, and B. Okun, Compactly supported
cohomology of buildings, Comment. Math. Helv. 85 (2010), no. 3, 551–582. MR 2653692
(2011k:20081)
A. Hatcher, Algebraic topology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002. MR 1867354
(2002k:55001)
J. E. Humphreys, Reflection groups and Coxeter groups, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 29, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990. MR 1066460
(92h:20002)
B. Krön and R. G. Möller, Analogues of Cayley graphs for topological groups, Math. Z. 258
(2008), no. 3, 637–675. MR 2369049 (2009c:22002)
P. A. Linnell, On accessibility of groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 30 (1983), no. 1, 39–46.
MR 716233 (85c:20021)
S. Mac Lane, Homology, Classics in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, Reprint of
the 1975 edition. MR 1344215 (96d:18001)
G. Mislin, Equivariant K-homology of the classifying space for proper actions, Proper group
actions and the Baum-Connes conjecture, Adv. Courses Math. CRM Barcelona, Birkhäuser,
Basel, 2003, pp. 1–78. MR 2027169 (2005e:19008)
C. C. Moore, Group extensions of p-adic and adelic linear groups, Inst. Hautes Études Sci.
Publ. Math. (1968), no. 35, 157–222. MR 0244258 (39 #5575)
, Group extensions and cohomology for locally compact groups. III, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 221 (1976), no. 1, 1–33. MR 0414775 (54 #2867)
, Group extensions and cohomology for locally compact groups. IV, Trans. Amer.
Math. Soc. 221 (1976), no. 1, 35–58. MR 0414776 (54 #2868)
G. Moussong, Hyperbolic Coxeter groups, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1988, Thesis
(Ph.D.)–The Ohio State University. MR 2636665
Y. A. Neretin, Combinatorial analogues of the group of diffeomorphisms of the circle, Izv.
Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 56 (1992), no. 5, 1072–1085. MR 1209033 (94h:22008)
B. Rémy, Groupes de Kac-Moody déployés et presque déployés, Astérisque (2002), no. 277,
viii+348. MR 1909671 (2003d:20036)
, Topological simplicity, commensurator super-rigidity and non-linearities of KacMoody groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 14 (2004), no. 4, 810–852, With an appendix by P.
Bonvin. MR 2084981 (2005g:22024)
50
I. CASTELLANO AND TH. WEIGEL
[40] B. Rémy and M. Ronan, Topological groups of Kac-Moody type, right-angled twinnings and
their lattices, Comment. Math. Helv. 81 (2006), no. 1, 191–219. MR 2208804 (2007b:20063)
[41] J-P. Serre, Trees, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980, Translated from the French by John Stillwell.
MR 607504 (82c:20083)
[42]
, Galois cohomology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997, Translated from the French by
Patrick Ion and revised by the author. MR 1466966 (98g:12007)
[43] E. H. Spanier, Algebraic topology, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1966. MR 0210112 (35
#1007)
[44] J. R. Stallings, On torsion-free groups with infinitely many ends, Ann. of Math. (2) 88 (1968),
312–334.
[45] T. Terragni and Th. Weigel, The Euler characteristic of a Hecke algebra, J. Pure Appl.
Algebra 219 (2015), no. 4, 1008–1019. MR 3282120
[46] J. Tits, Reductive groups over local fields, Automorphic forms, representations and Lfunctions (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, Ore., 1977), Part 1,
Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1979, pp. 29–69.
MR 546588 (80h:20064)
[47] T. tom Dieck, Transformation groups, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, vol. 8, Walter de
Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1987. MR 889050 (89c:57048)
[48] D. van Dantzig, Studien über topologische Algebra, Dissertation, 1931.
[49] C. A. Weibel, An introduction to homological algebra, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 38, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994. MR 1269324 (95f:18001)
[50] R. M. Weiss, The structure of affine buildings, Annals of Mathematics Studies, vol. 168,
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009. MR 2468338 (2009m:51022)
[51] G. A. Willis, Tidy subgroups for commuting automorphisms of totally disconnected groups:
an analogue of simultaneous triangularisation of matrices, New York J. Math. 10 (2004),
1–35 (electronic). MR 2052362 (2005a:20041)
I. Castellano, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Bari ”Aldo Moro”, Via
E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
Th. Weigel, Dipartimento di Matematica e Applicazioni, Università degli Studi di
Milano-Bicocca, Ed. U5, Via R.Cozzi 55, 20125 Milano, Italy
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
Generalized Preconditioning and Network Flow Problems
Jonah Sherman∗
University of California, Berkeley
June 28, 2016(preliminary draft)
arXiv:1606.07425v2 [cs.DS] 27 Jun 2016
Abstract
We consider approximation algorithms for the problem of finding x of minimal norm kxk satisfying a
linear system Ax = b, where the norm k · k is arbitrary and generally non-Euclidean. We show a simple
general technique for composing solvers, converting iterative solvers with residual error kAx−bk ≤ t−Ω(1)
into solvers with residual error exp(−Ω(t)), at the cost of an increase in kxk, by recursively invoking the
solver on the residual problem b̃ = b − Ax. Convergence of the composed solvers depends strongly
on a generalization of the classical condition number to general norms, reducing the task of designing
algorithms for many such problems to that of designing a generalized preconditioner for A. The new
ideas significantly generalize those introduced by the author’s earlier work on maximum flow, making
them more widely applicable.
As an application of the new technique, we present a nearly-linear time approximation algorithm for
uncapacitated minimum-cost flow on undirected graphs. Given an undirected graph with m edges labelled
with costs, and n vertices labelled with demands, the algorithm takes −2 m1+o(1) -time and outputs a flow
routing the demands with total cost at most (1 + ) times larger than minimal, along with a dual solution
proving near-optimality. The generalized preconditioner is obtained by embedding the cost metric into
`1 , and then considering a simple hierarchical routing scheme in `1 where demands initially supported
on a dense lattice are pulled from a sparser lattice by randomly rounding unaligned coordinates to their
aligned neighbors. Analysis of the generalized condition number for the corresponding preconditioner
follows that of the classical multigrid algorithm for lattice Laplacian systems.
1
Introduction
A fundamental problem in optimization theory is that of finding solutions x of minimum-norm kxk to
rectangular linear systems Ax = b. Such solvers have extensive applications, due to the fact that many
practical optimization problems reduce to minimum norm problems. When the norm is Euclidean, classical
iterative solvers such as steepest descent and conjugate gradient methods produce approximately optimal
solutions with residual error kAx − bk exponentially small in iteration count, The rate of exponential
convergence depends strongly on the condition number of the square matrix AA∗ .
Therefore, the algorithm design process for such problems typically consists entirely of efficiently constructing preconditioners: easily computable left-cancellable operators P, for which the transformed problem PA = Pb is well-conditioned so iterative methods converge rapidly. In a seminal work, Spielman and
Teng[17] present a nearly-linear-time algorithm to construct preconditioners with condition number polylogarithmic in problem dimension for a large class of operators A, including Laplacian systems and others
arising from discretization of elliptic PDEs.
There are many fundamental optimization problems that can be expressed as minimum-norm problems
with respect to more general, non-Euclidean norms, including some statistical inference problems and network
flow problems on graphs. In particular, the fundamental maximum-flow and uncapacitated minimum-cost
flow problems reduce respectively to `∞ and `1 minimum-norm problems in the undirected case.
For such problems, there is presently no known black-box iterative solver analagous to those for `2 that
converge exponentially with rate independent of problem dimension. Therefore, one is forced to choose
between interior point methods to obtain zero or exponentially small error[4], at the cost of iteration count
depending strongly on problem dimension, or alternative methods that have error only polynomially small
with respect to iterations[15, 9, 14].
∗ Research
supported by NSF Grant CCF-1410022
An important idea implicitly used by classical iterative `2 solvers is residual recursion: reducing the error
of an approximate solution x by recursively applying the solver to b̃ = b − Ax. Such recursion is implicit
in those solvers due to the fact that in `2 , the map b 7→ xopt is linear, with xopt = (AA∗ )+ b. Therefore,
the classical methods are effectively recursing on every iteration, with no distinction between iterations and
recursive solves. In general norms, an xopt may not be unique, and there is generally no linear operator
mapping b to some xopt .
In this paper, we make two primary contibutions. Our first contribution is to extend analysis of residual
recursion to arbitrary norms. We present a general and modular framework for efficiently solving minimumnorm problems by composing simple well-known base solvers. The main tool is the composition lemma, describing the approximation parameters of a solver composed via residual recursion of two black-box solvers.
The resulting parameters depend on a generalization of the condition number to arbitrary norms; therefore,
much like `2 , the algorithm design process is reduced to constructing good generalized preconditioners. Our
second contribution is to present, as a practical application of those tools, a nearly-linear time approximation
algorithm for the uncapacitated minimum-cost flow problem on undirected graphs. Having established the
former framework, the latter algorithm is entirely specified by the construction of a generalized preconditioner, and analyzed by bounding its generalized condition number.
Our framework builds upon earlier work[16], where we leveraged ideas introduced by Spielman and Teng
to obtain nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for undirected maximum flow. We have since realized
that some of the techniques applied to extend `2 -flows to `∞ -flows are in no way specific to flows, and indeed
the composition framework presented here is a generalization of those ideas to non-Euclidean minimum-norm
problems. Moreover, a significantly simpler max-flow algorithm may be recovered using black-box solvers
and general composition as presented here, requiring only the truly flow-specific part of the earlier work: the
congestion approximator, now understood to be a specific instance of a more widely-applicable generalized
preconditioner.
We proceed to discuss those contributions separately in more detail, and outline the corresponding
sections of the paper. We also discuss some related work.
1.1
Minimum Norm Problems
In section 2, we define the minimum norm problem more precisely, and introduce a useful bicriteria notion of
approximation we call (α, β)-solutions. In that notion, α quantifies how much kxk relatively exceeds kxopt k,
and β quantifies the residual error kAx − bk, with an appropriate relative scale factor. We may succinctly
describe some frequently used algorithms as (α, β)-solvers; we discuss some examples in section 4, including
steepest descent and conjugate gradient for `2 , and multiplicative weights for `1 and `∞ .
In section 3, we present the composition lemma, which shows that by composing a (α1 , β1 )-solver with
a (α2 , β2 )-solver in a black-box manner, we obtain a (α3 , β3 )-solver with different parameter tradeoffs. The
composed algorithm’s parameters (α3 , β3 ) depends crucially on a generalization of the classical condition
number to rectangular matrices in general norms; Demko[7] provides essentially the exact such generalization
needed, so we briefly recall that definition before stating and proving the composition lemma. The proof of
the composition lemma is not difficult; it follows quite easily once the right definitions of (α, β)-solutions and a
generalized condition number have been established. Nevertheless, the modularity of the composition lemma
proves to quite useful. By recursively composing a solver with itself t times, we may decrease β exponentially
with t, at the cost of a single fixed increase in α. By composing solvers with different parameters, better
parameters may be obtained than any single solver alone. A particularly useful example uses a (M, 0)-solver,
where M is uselessly-large on its own, to terminate a chain of t solvers and obtain zero error. As the final
step in the chain, we get all of the benefits (zero error), and almost none of the costs, as it contributes M 2−t
instead of M to the final solver.
By composing the existing solvers discussed in section 4, we obtain solvers for `1 and `∞ problems with
residual error exponentially small in t. We state the final composed algorithms parameters. As a result, the
algorithm design problem for such problems is reduced to that of designing a generalized preconditioner for
A. We briefly discuss such preconditioning in section 5.
1.2
Minimum Cost Flow
The second part of this paper applies generalized preconditioning to solve a fundamental problem in network optimization. In the uncapacitated minimum-cost flow problem on undirected graphs, we are given a
connected graph G with m edges, each annotated with a cost, and a specified demand at each vertex. The
2
problem is to find an edge flow with vertex divergences equal to the specified demands, of minimal total cost.
Our main result is a randomized algorithm that, given such a problem, takes −2 m1+o(1) time and outputs
a flow meeting the demands with cost at most (1 + )-times that of optimal. We define various flow-related
terms and give a more precise statement of the problem and our result in section 6.
We describe and analyze the algorithm in section 7. Having built up our general tools in earlier sections,
our task is reduced to the design and analysis of a generalized preconditioner for min-cost flow. We begin
by interpreting the edge costs as lengths inducing a metric on the graph, and then apply Bourgain’s smalldistortion embedding[3] into `1 . That is, by paying a small distortion factor in our final condition number,
we may focus entirely on designing a preconditioner for min-cost flow in `1 space. The construction of our
precondtitioner is based on an extremely simple hierarchical routing scheme, inspired by a combination of
the multigrid algorithm for grid Laplacians, and the Barnes-Hut algorithm for n-body simulation[2]. The
routing scheme proceeds on a sequence of increasingly dense lattices V0 , V1 , . . . in `1 , where Vt are the lattice
points with spacing 2−t , and the input demands are specified on the densest level VT . Starting at level t = T ,
the routing scheme sequentially eliminates the demand supported on Vt \ Vt−1 by pulling the demand from
level t − 1 using a random-rounding based routing: each vertex x ∈ Vt picks a random nearest neighbor in
Vt−1 , corresponding to randomly rounding its unaligned coordinates, and then pulls a fractional part of its
demand from that neighbor via any shortest path. Afterwards, all demands on Vt \ Vt−1 are met, leaving
a reduced problem with demands supported on Vt−1 . The scheme then recurses on the reduced problem.
At level 0, the demands are supported on the corners of a hypercube, for which the simple routing scheme
of pulling all demand from a uniformly random corner performs well-enough. Having described the routing
scheme, we need not actually carry it out. Instead, our preconditioner crudely estimates the cost of that
routing. Furthermore, while the routing has been described on an infinite lattice, we’ll observe that if the
demands are only initially supported on a small set of n vertices, the support remains small throughout.
1.3
Related Work
Spielman and Teng present a nearly-linear time algorithm for preconditioning and solving symmetric diagonally dominant matrices, including those of graph Laplacians[17]. The ideas introduced in that work have
led to breakthroughs in various network cut and flow algorithms for the case of undirected graphs. Christiano et. al. apply the solver as a black-box to approximately solve the maximum flow problem in Θ(m4/3 )
time. Madry[13] opens the box and uses the ideas directly to give a family of algorithms for approximating
cut-problems, including a mo(1) -approximation in m1+o(1) time. Both the present author[16] and Kelner et.
al.[11] combine madry’s ideas with `∞ optimization methods to obtain (1 − )-approxmations to maximum
flow in m1+o(1) −O(1) time. While those two algorithms use similar ideas, the actual path followed to achieve
the result is rather different. Kelner et. al. construct an oblivious routing scheme that is no(1) -competetive,
and then show how to use it to obtain a flow. The algorithm maintains a demand-respecting flow at all times,
and minimizes a potential function measuring edge congestion. In contrast, our earlier algorithm short-cuts
the need to explicitly construct the routing scheme by using Madry’s construction directly, maintaining a
flow that is neither demand nor capacity respecting, aiming to minimize a certain potential function that
measures both the congestion and the demand error.
For min-cost flow, earlier work considers the more general directed, capacitated case, with integer capacities in {1, . . . , U }. The Θ(nm log log U )-time double-scaling algorithm of Ahuja, Goldberg, Orlin, and
Tarjan[1] remained the fastest algorithm for solving min-cost flow for 25 years between its publication and
the Laplacian breakthrough. Shortly after that breakthrough, Daitch and Spielman[5] showed how to use the
Laplacian solver with interior-point methods to obtain an Θ(m3/2 log2 U )-time algorithm. Lee and Sidford
√
further reduce this to Θ(m n logO(1) U ) by a general improvement in interior point methods[12]. We are
not aware of prior work
2
Approximate Solutions
Let X , Y be finite dimensional vector spaces, where X is also a Banach space, and let A ∈ Lin(X , Y) be
fixed throughout this section. We consider the problem of finding a minimal norm pre-image of a specified
b in the image of A; that is, finding x ∈ X with Ax = b and kxkX minimal.
Let xopt be an exact solution, with Axopt = b, and kxopt kX minimal. There are multiple notions of
3
approximate solutions for this problem. The most immediate is x ∈ X with Ax = b and
kxk
≤α
kxopt k
(1)
. We call such x an (α, 0)-solution; we shall be interested in finding (1 + , 0)-solutions for small . A weaker
notion of approximation is obtained by further relaxing Ax = b to Ax u b. Quantifying that requires
more structure on Y, so let us further assume Y to also be a Banach space. In that case, we say x is an
(α, β)-solution if equation 1 holds and
kAx − bk
≤β
(2)
kAkkxopt k
The practical utility of such solutions depends on the application. However, the weaker notion has the
distinct advantage of being approachable by a larger family of algorithms, such as penalty and dual methods,
by avoiding equality constraints. We discuss such existing algorithms in section 4, but mention that they
typically yield (1, )-solutions after some number of iterations. For `2 , the iteration dependency on is
O(log(1/)), while for some more general norms it is −O(1) .
3
Recursive Composition and Generalized Condition Numbers
We now consider how to trade an increase in α for a decrease in β. Residual recursion suggests a natural
strategy: after finding an (α, β)-solution, recurse on b̃ = b − Ax. More precisely, we define the composition
of two algorithms as follows.
Definition 3.1. Let Fi be an (αi , βi )-algorithm for A, for i ∈ {1, 2}. The composition F2 ◦ F1 takes input
b, and first runs F1 on b to obtain x. Next, setting b̃ = b − Ax, it runs F2 on input b̃ to obtain x̃. Finally,
it outputs x + x̃.
Success of composition depends on kb̃kY being small implying b̃ has a small-norm pre-image. The extent
to which that is true is quantified by the condition number of A. The condition number in `2 may be defined
several ways, resulting in the same quantity. When generalized to arbitrary norms, those definitions differ.
We recall two natural definitions, following Demko[7].
Definition 3.2. The non-linear condition number of A : X → Y is
kAkX →Y kxkX
κ̃X →Y (A) = min
: Ax 6= 0
kAxkY
The linear condition number is defined by
κX →Y (A) = min {kAkX →Y kGkY→X : G ∈ Lin(Y, X ) : AGA = A}
Of course, κ̃ ≤ κ. Having defined the condition number, we may now state how composition affects the
approximation parameters.
Theorem 3.3 (Composition). Let Fi be an (αi , βi /κ̃)-algorithm for A : X → Y, where A has non-linear
condition number κ̃ Then, the composition F2 ◦ F1 is an (α1 + α2 β1 , β1 β2 /κ̃-algorithm for the same problem.
Before proving lemma 3.3, we state two useful corollaries. The first concerns the result of recursively
composing a (α, β/κ̃)-algorithm with itself.
Corollary 3.4. Let F be a (α, β/κ̃)-algorithm for β < 1. Let F t be the sequence formed by iterated composition, with F 1 = F , F t+1 = F t ◦ F . Then, F t is a (α/(1 − β), β t /κ̃)-algorithm.
Proof. By induction on t. To start, an (α, β/κ̃)-algorithm is trivially a (α/(1−β), β/κ̃)-algorithm. Assuming
the claim holds for F t , lemma 3.3 implies F t+1 is a (α + αβ/(1 − β), β t+1 /κ̃)-algorithm.
We observe that to obtain (1 + O(), δ)-solution, only the first solver in the chain need be very accurate.
Corollary 3.5. Let F be a (1+, /2κ̃-solver and G be a (2, 1/2κ̃)-solver. Then, Gt ◦F is a (1+5, 2−t−1 /κ̃solver.
For some problems, there is a very simple (M, 0)-solver known. A final composition with that solver
serves to elimate the error.
Corollary 3.6. Let F be a (1 + , δ/κ̃)-solver and G be a (M, 0)-solver. Then G ◦ F is a (1 + (1 + δM ), 0)solver.
4
3.1
Proof of lemma 3.3
Since F1 is an (α1 , β1 /κ̃)-algorithm, we have
kxk
kb̃k
kAk
≤ α1 kxopt k
β1
kxopt k
κ̃
≤
By the definition of κ̃,
kx̃opt k ≤ κ̃
kb̃k
≤ β1 kxopt k
kAk
Since F2 is an (α2 , β2 /κ̃)-algorithm,
kx̃k
kAx̃ − b̃k
kAk
≤ α2 kx̃opt k ≤ α2 β1 kxkopt
≤
β2
β 1 β2
kx̃opt k ≤
κ̃
κ̃
The conclusion follows from kx + x̃k ≤ kxk + kx̃k.
4
Solvers for `p
The recursive composition technique takes existing (α, β)-approximation algorithms and yields new algorithms with different approximation parameters. In this section, we discuss the parameters of existing
well-known base solvers.
Let A : Rm → Rn be linear and fixed throughout this section. To concisely describe results and ease
comparison, for a norm k · kX on Rm and a norm k · kY in Rn , we write (α, β)X →Y to denote an (α, β)
solution with respect to A : X → Y.
The classical `2 solvers provide a useful goalpost for comparison.
Theorem 4.1 ([4]).
The steepest-descent algorithm produces a (1, δ)2→2 -solution after O(κ2→2 (A)2 log(1/δ)) simple iterations
The conjugate gradient algorithm produces a (1, δ)2→2 -solution after O(κ2→2 (A) log(1/δ)) simple iterations.
There are many existing algorithms for p-norm minimization, and composing them yields algorithms with
exponentially small error. For this initial manuscript, we simply state the `1 version required for min-cost
flow. The general cases consist of describing the many existing algorithms[14] in terms of (α, β)-solvers.
Theorem 4.2. There is a (1 + , δ)1→1 -solver with simple iterations totalling
O κ̃1→1 (A)2 log(m) −2 ) + log(δ −1 )
Theorem 4.3. There is a (1 + , δ)∞→∞ -solver with simple iterations totalling
O κ̃∞→∞ (A)2 log(n) −2 + log(δ −1 )
The preceding theorems follow by combining the multiplicative weights algorithm[15, 9] with the composition lemma. The former algorithm applies in a more general online setting; for our applications, the
algorithm yields the “weak” approximation algorithms that shall be composed.
A support oracle for a compact-convex set C takes input y and returns some x ∈ C maximizing x · C.
Let 4n be the unit simplex in Rn (i.e., the convex hull of the standard basis).
The multiplicative weights method finds approximate solutions to the saddle point problem,
max min w · z
w∈4n z∈C
In particular, it obtains an additive -approximation in O(ρ2 −2 log n) iterations with each iteration taking
O(n) time plus a call to a support oracle for C.
5
Let Bp be the unit ball in `p . A point w ∈ B1 is represented as w = w+ − w− for (w+ , w− ) ∈ 42n . The
base solvers follow by considering the saddle-point problems,
max min
y ∗ · (Ax − µb)
max min
y ∗ · (Ax − µb)
y ∗ ∈b1 x∈b∞
x∈b1 y ∗ ∈b∞
where µ is scaled via binary-search as needed. The search adds a factor O(log κ̃) to the complexity. This
factor may be avoided by using `p -norm for p = log n and p = (log m)/ regularization, respectively, instead.
5
Generalized Preconditioning
Let A : X → Y be linear. The minimum-norm problem for A does not intrinsically require Y to be normed;
nor does the definition of a (α, 0)-solution. Thus, an algorithm designer seeking to solve a class of minimum
norm problems may freely choose how to norm Y. The best choice requires balancing two factors. First, the
norm should be sufficiently “simple” that (1, ) solutions for polynomially-small are easy to find. Second,
the norm should be chosen so that κ̃(A)X →Y is small. If only the latter constraint existed, the ideal choice
would be the optimal A pre-image norm,1
kbkopt(A) = min{kxkX : Ax = b}
By construction, κ̃(A)X →opt(A) = 1. Of course, simply evaluating that norm is equivalent to the original
problem we aim to solve. It follows that Y should be equipped with the relatively closest norm to opt(A)
that can be efficiently minimized.
Following the common approach in `2 , when X = `p , we propose to choose a generalized pre-conditioner
P : Y → `p injective and consider the norm kPbkp . Again, P should be chosen such that κ̃(PA)p→p is
small, and P, P∗ are easy to compute.
6
Graph Problems
In this section we discuss some applications of generalized preconditioning to network flow problems. Let
G = (V, E) be an undirected graph with n vertices and m edges. While undirected, we assume the edges
are oriented arbitrarily. We denote by V ∗ , E ∗ the spaces of real-valued functions f : V → R and f : E → R
on vertices and edges, respectively. We denote by V, E the corresponding dual spaces of demands and flows.
For S ⊆ V , we write 1S ∈ V ∗ for the indicator function on S.
The discrete derivative operator D∗ : V ∗ → E ∗ is defined by (D∗ f )(xy) = f (y) − f (x) for each oriented
edge xy. The constant function has zero derivative, D∗ 1V = 0. The (negative) adjoint −D : E → V is
the discrete divergence operator ; for a flow ∈ E and vertex x ∈ V , −(D)(x) is the net quantity being
transported away from vertex x by the flow.
A single-commodity flow problem is specified by a demand vector b ∈ V, and requires finding a flow ∈ E
satisfying D = b, minimizing some cost function. When the cost-function is a norm on E, the problem is a
minimum-norm pre-image problem. Assuming G is connected, b has a pre-image iff the total demand 1V · b
is zero. We hereafter assume G to be connected and total demands equal to zero.
Having established the generalized preconditioning framework, we may now design fast algorithms for
fundamental network flow problems by designing generalized preconditioners for the corresponding minimumnorm problems. As a result, we obtain nearly-linear time algorithms for max-flow and uncapacitated min-cost
flow in undirected graphs. The max-flow algorithm was presented previously[16], and involved a combination
of problem-specific definitions (e.g. congestion approximators) and subroutines (e.g. gradient-based `∞
minimization). The brief summary in subsection 6.1 shows how the same result may be immediately obtained
by combining theorem ?? with only small part of the earlier flow-specific work[16]: the actual construction
of the preconditioner.
In section 7, we present a nearly-linear time algorithm for uncapacitated min-cost flows, another fundamental network optimization problem. Once again, all that is needed is description and analysis of the
preconditioner.
1 We remark this is only defined on the image space of A, rather than the entire codomain. However, we only consider b in
that image space
6
6.1
Max-Flow
A capacitated graph associates with each edge e, a capacity c(e) > 0. Given capacities, we define the capacity
P
norm on E ∗ by kf kc∗ = e c(e)|f (e)|; the dual congestion norm on E is defined by kkc = maxe |(e)|
c(e) .
∗
The boundary capacity of a set S ⊆ V is kD 1S kc , which we abbreviate as c(∂S).
The single-commodity flow problem with capacity norm is undirected maximum flow problem, and is a
fundamental problem in network design and optimization. Following the work of Spielman and Teng for
`2 -flows[17], and Madry[13] for cut problems, the author has obtained a nearly-linear time algorithm for
maximum flow[16]. We have since realized that only certain parts of the ideas introduced in that paper
are actually specific to maximum-flow, and the present work has been obtained through generalizing the
other parts. The (previously presented as) flow-specific composition and optimization parts of that paper
are entirely subsumed by the earlier sections of this paper. The truly flow-specific part of that work required
to complete the algorithm is the generalized preconditioner construction, which we have previously called a
congestion-approximator. We briefly describe the main ideas of the construction, and some simple illustrative
examples. For the full details, we refer the reader to the third section of [16].
Let F ⊆ 2V be a family of subsets. Such a family, together with a capacity norm on E, induces a cut|1S ·b|
. That is, for each set in the family, consider the
congestion semi-norm on V via kbkc(F) = maxS∈F c(∂S)
ratio of the total aggregate demand in that set to the total capacity of all edges entering that set. If the
indicator functions of sets in F span V, then it is a norm. Note also that we may write kbkc(F) = kPbk∞ ,
1S ·b
.
where P : Rn → RF is defined by (Pb)S = c(∂S)
V
If F is taken to be the full power set F = 2 , the max-flow, min-cut theorem is equivalent to the statement
that the non-linear condition number κ̃c→c(F) (D∗ ) is exactly one. If F is taken to be the family of singleton
sets, the non-linear condition number is the inverse of the combinatorial conductance of G. That is, for highconductance graphs, composition yields a fast algorithm requiring only a simple diagonal preconditioner.
This is closely analagous to the situation for `2 , where diagonal preconditioning yields fast algorithms for
graphs of large algebraic conductance.
A√particularly illustrative example consists of a unit-capacity 2t × 2t 2-D grid. With low (Θ(2−t ) =
Θ(1/ n) conductance, the singleton family F performs poorly. A simple but dramatically better family
consists of taking F to be all power-of-two size, power-of-two aligned subgrids. The latter family yields linear
condition number O(t) = O(log n). Furthermore, computing the aggregate demand in all such sets requires
only O(n) time, with each sub-grid aggregate equal to the sum of its four child aggregates. This algorithm
is analagous to an `∞ version of multi-grid [?]. Note that the indicator “step” functions 1S are different from
the bilinear “pyramid” functions used by multigrid.
Theorem 6.1 ([16]). There is an algorithm that given a capacitated graph (G, c) with n vertices and m edges,
takes m1+o(1) time and outputs a data structure of size n1+o(1) that efficiently represents a preconditioner P
with κ(PD)c→∞ ≤ no(1) . Given the data structure, P and P∗ can be applied in n1+o(1) time.
Let C : Rm → E be the diagonal capacity matrix; (Cx)(e) = c(e)x(e). The nearly-linear time algorithm
follows by using the preconditioner P in the preceding theorem, applying theorem ?? to the problem of
minimizing kxk∞ subject to PDCx = b. A final minor flow-specific part is needed to achieve zero error:
the simple (m, 0)-approximation algorithm that consists of routing all flow through a maximum-capacity
spanning tree.
7
Uncapacitated Min-Cost Flow
In this section, we present a nearly-linear time algorithm for the uncapacitated minimum-cost flow problem
on undirected graphs. A cost graph associates
P a cost l(e) > 0 with each edge e in G. The cost norm on
the space of flows E is defined by kkl = e k(e)kl(e). The undirected uncapacitated minimum-cost flow
problem is specified by the graph G, lengths `, and demands b ∈ V, and consists of finding ∈ E with
D = b minimizing kkl . Note that, unlike max-flow, the single-source uncapacitated min-cost flow problem
is significantly easier than the distributed source case: the optimal solution is to route along a single-source
shortest path away from the source. The problem only becomes interesting with distributed sources and
sinks.
As a new application of generalized preconditioning, we obtain a nearly-linear time algorithm for approximately solving this problem.
7
Theorem 7.1. There is a randomized algorithm that, given a length-graph G = (V, E, l), takes
and outputs a (1 + , 0)-solution to the undirected uncapacitated min-cost flow problem.
m1+o(1)
2
time
As expected, the bulk of the algorithm lies in constructing a good preconditioner. After introducing
some useful definitions and lemmas, we spend the majority of this section constructing and analyzing a
preconditioner for this problem.
Theorem 7.2. There is a randomized algorithm that, given a length-graph G, takes O(m log2 n + n1+o(1) )
time and outputs a n1+o(1) × n matrix P with κlto∞ (PD) ≤ no(1) . Every column of P has no(1) non-zero
entries.
Dual to cost is the stretch norm on E ∗ is kf kl∗ = maxe |f (e)|/l(e). We say a function φ ∈ V is L-Lipschitz
iff kD∗ φkl∗ ≤ L; that is, |φ(x) − φ(y)| ≤ Ll(xy) for all edges xy. The dual problem is to maximize φ · b over
1-Lipschitz φ ∈ V.
A length function l induces an intrinsic metric d : V × V → R, with distances determined by shortest
paths. The preceding definition of Lipschitz is equivalent to |φ(x) − φ(y)| ≤ Ld(x, y) for all x, y ∈ V . That
is, the Lipschitz constant of φ depends only on the metric, and is otherwise independent of the particular
graph or edge lengths inducing that metric. As the dual problem depends only on the induced metric, so
must the value of the min-cost flow. Therefore, we may unambiguously write
kbkopt(d) = max{φ · b : φ is 1-Lipschitz w.r.t. d}
The monotonicity of cost with distance follows immediately.
Lemma 7.3. If d(x, y) ≤ d̃(x, y) for all x, y ∈ V, then for all b ∈ V⊥1 ,
kbkopt(d) ≤ kbkopt(d̃)
We recall that in some cases, the identity operator is a good preconditioner; for max-flow, such is the case
in constant-degree expanders. For min-cost flow, the analagous case is a metric where distances between any
pair of points differ relatively by small factors.
Definition 7.4. Let U ⊆ V . We say U is r-separated if d(x, y) ≥ r for all x, y ∈ U with x 6= y. We say U
is R-bounded if d(x, y) ≤ R for all x, y ∈ U .
Lemma 7.5. Let U ⊂ V be R-bounded and r-separated with respect to d. Let b ∈ V⊥1 be demands supported
on U . Then,
R
r
kbk1 ≤ kbkopt(d) ≤ kbk1
2
2
Proof. Note 2r kbk1 is exactly the min-cost of routing b in the metric where all distances are exactly r (consider
the star graph with edge lengths r/2, with a leaf for each x ∈ U ). The inequalities follow by monotonicity.
To complete the proof of theorem 7.1, assuming theorem 7.2, we also need a simple approximation
algorithm that yields a poor approximation, but with zero error. This is easily achieved by the algorithm
that routes all flow through a minimum cost (i.e., total length) spanning tree T .
Lemma 7.6. Let T be a minimum cost spanning tree with respect to l on G. Consider the algorithm that,
given b ∈ V⊥1 , outputs the flow ∈ E routing b using only the edges in T . Then,
kk ≤ nkbkopt(d)
Proof. The flow on T is unique, and therefore, optimal for the metric d̃ induced by paths restricted to lie in
T . As T is a minimum cost spanning tree, d̃(x, y) ≤ nd(x, y).
We now prove theorem 7.1. Let L : Rm → E be the diagonal length matrix (Lx)(e) = `(e)x(e), and let P
be the preconditioner from theorem 7.2. Computing P takes O(m log2 n) + n1+o(1) time. The minimum-cost
flow problem is equivalent to the problem of minimizing kxk1 subject to PDL−1 x = Pb. As P has n1+o(1)
1+o(1)
non-zero entries and κ1→1 (PDL−1 ) ≤ no(1) , the total running time is m 2 .
8
8
Preconditioning Min-Cost Flow
A basic concept in metric spaces is that of an embedding: ψ : V → Ṽ , with respective metrics d, d̃. An
embedding has distortion L if for some µ > 0,
1≤µ
d̃(ψ(x), ψ(y))
≤L
d(x, y)
Metric embeddings are quite useful for preconditioning; if d embeds into d̃ with distortion L, then the
monotonicity lemma implies the relative costs of flow problems differ by a factor L. It follows that if we can
construct a preconditioner P for the min-cost flow problem on d̃, the same P may be used to precondition
min-cost flow on d, with condition number at most L-factor worse.
Our preconditioner uses embeddings in two ways. The preconditioner itself is based on a certain hierarchical routing scheme. Hierarchical routing schemes based on embeddings into tree-metrics have been
studied extensively(see e.g. [8]), and immediately yield preconditioners with polylogarithmic condition number. However, we are unable to efficiently implement those schemes in nearly-linear time. Instead, we apply
Bourgain’s O(log n)-distortion embedding[3] into `1 . That is, by paying an O(log n) factor in condition
number, we may completely restrict our attention to approximating min-cost flow in `1 space.
Theorem 8.1 (Bourgain’s Embedding[3]). Any n-point metric space embeds into `p space with distortion
O(log n). If d is the intrinsic metric of a length-graph G = (V, E) with m edges, there is a randomized
algorithm that takes O(m log2 n) time and w.h.p. outputs such an embedding, with dimension O(log2 n).
The complexity of constructing and evaluating√our preconditioner is exponential in the embedding’s
√ dimension. Therefore, we reduce the dimension to Θ( log n), incuring another distortion factor of exp(O( log n)).
Theorem 8.2 (Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma[10, 6]). Any n points in Euclidean space embed into kdimensional Euclidean space√with distortion nO(1/k)
√ , for k ≤ Ω(log n). In particular, k = O(log n) yields
O(1) distortion, and k = O( log n) yields exp(O( log n)) distortion.
If the original points are in d > k dimensions, there is a randomized algorithm that w.h.p outputs such
an embedding in O(nd) time.
Our√reduction consists of first embedding the vertices into `2 via theorem 8.1, reducing the dimension to
k = O( log
√ n) using lemma 8.2, and then using the identity embedding of `2 into `1 , for a total distortion
of exp(O( log n)).
To estimate routing costs in `1 , we propose an extremely simple hierarchical routing algorithm in `1 , and
show it achieves a certain competetive ratio. The routing scheme applies to the exponentially large graph
corresponding to a lattice discretization of the k-dimensional cube in `1 ; after describing such a scheme, we
show that if the demands in that graph are supported on n vertices, the distributed routing algorithm finds
no demand to route in most of the graph, and the same routing algorithm may be carried out in a k − d-tree
instead of the entire lattice.
On the lattice, the routing algorithm consists of sequentially reducing the support set of the demands
from a lattice with spacing 2−t−1 to a lattice with spacing 2−t , until all demand is supported on the corners
of a cube containing the original demand points. On each level, the demand on a vertex not appearing in
the coarser level is eliminated by pushing its demand to a distribution over the aligned points nearby.
8.1
Lattice Algorithm
For t ∈ Z, let Vt = (2−t Z)k be the lattice with spacing 2−t . We design a routing scheme and preconditioner for
min-cost flow in `1 , with initial input demands bT supported on a bounded subset of VT . For t = T, T −1, . . .,
the routing scheme recursively reduces a min-cost flow problem with demands supported on Vt to a min-cost
flow problem with demands supported on the sparser lattice Vt−1 . Given demands bt supported on Vt , the
scheme consists of each vertex x ∈ Vt pulling its demand bt (x) uniformly from the closest points to x in Vt−1
along any shortest path, the lengths of which are at most k2−t . For example, a point x = (x1 , . . . , xk ) ∈ V1
with j ≤ k non-integer coordinates and demand b1 (x) pulls b1 (x)2−j units of flow from each of the 2j points
in V0 corresponding to rounding those j coordinates in any way. By construction, all points in Vt \ Vt−1
have their demands met exactly, and we are left with a reduced problem residual demands bt−1 supported on
Vt−1 . As we show, eventually the demands are supported entirely on the 2k corners of a hypercube forming a
9
bounding box of the original support set, at which point the the simple scheme of distributing the remaining
demand uniformly to all corners is a k-factor approximation.
We do not actually carry out the routing; rather, we state a crude upper-bound on its cost, and then
show that bound itself exceeds the true min-cost by a factor of some κ. For the preconditioner, we shall only
require the sequence of reduced demands bt , bt−1 , . . ., and not the flow actually routing them.
Theorem 8.3.
kbt kopt ≤
t
X
k2−s kbs k1 ≤ 2k(t + 1)kbt kopt
s=0
Assuming theorem 8.3 holds, we take our preconditioner to be a matrix P such that,
kPbT k1 =
T
X
k2−t kbt k1
t=0
The proof of theorem 8.3 uses two essential properties of the routing scheme described. The first is that
the cost incurred in the reduction from bt to bt−1 is not much larger than the min-cost of routing bt . The
second is the reduction does not increase costs. That is, the true min-cost for routing the reduced problem
bt−1 is at most that of routing the original demands bt .
Lemma 8.4. Let bt−1 be the reduced demands produced when the routing scheme is given bt . Then,
1. The cost incurred by that level of the scheme is at most k2−t kbt k1 ≤ 2kkbt kopt
2. The reduction is non-increasing with respect to min-cost: kbt−1 kopt ≤ kbt kopt
Assuming lemma 8.4, we now prove 8.3. We argue the sum is an upper bound on the total cost incurred
by the routing scheme, when applied to bt . The left inequality follows immediately, as the true min-cost is
no larger.
The total cost of the scheme is at most the cost incurred on each level, plus the cost of the final routing
of b0 . Lemma 8.4(a) accounts for all terms above s = 0. For the final routing, the demands b0 are supported
in {0, 1}k , so the cost of routing all demand to a random corner is at most 12 kkb0 k1 .
For the right inequality, we observe
t
X
k2−t kbt k1 ≤
s=0
t
X
2kkbs kopt
s=0
The inequality follows termwise, using lemma 8.4(a) for s ≥ 1; the s = 0 case follows from lemma 7.5 because
V0 is 1-separated.
8.2
Proof of Lemma 8.4
For the first part, each vertex x ∈ Vt routes its demand bt (x) to the closest points in Vt−1 any shortest path.
As such paths have length at most k2−t , each point x contributes at most k2−t |bt (x)|.
For the second part, by scale-invariance it suffices to consider t = 1. Moreover, it suffices to consider
the case where b1 consists of a unit demand from between two points x, y ∈ V1 with kx − yk1 = 21 . To see
this, we observe any flow routing arbitrary demands b1 consists of a sum of such single-edge flows. As the
reduction is linear, if the cost of each single-edge demand-pair is not increased, then the cost their sum is
not increased. By symmetry, it suffices to consider x, y with x = (0, z) and y = ( 21 , z). Then, the reduction
distributes x’s demand to a distribution over (0, z 0 ) where z 0 ∼ Z 0 ; y’s demand is split over (0, z 0 ) and (1, z 0 )
where z 0 ∼ Z 0 . Therefore, half of the demand at (0, z 0 ) is cancelled, leaving the residual problem of routing
1/2 unit from (0, z 0 ) to (1, z 0 ). That problem has cost 1/2, by routing each fraction directly from (0, z 0 ) to
(1, z 0 ).
References
[1] Ravindra K Ahuja, Andrew V Goldberg, James B Orlin, and Robert E Tarjan. Finding minimum-cost
flows by double scaling. Mathematical programming, 53(1-3):243–266, 1992.
10
[2] Josh Barnes and Piet Hut. A hierarchical o (n log n) force-calculation algorithm. nature, 324(6096):446–
449, 1986.
[3] J. Bourgain. On lipschitz embedding of finite metric spaces in hilbert space. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 52(1):46–52, 1985.
[4] Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe. Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, New York,
NY, USA, 2004.
[5] Samuel I Daitch and Daniel A Spielman. Faster approximate lossy generalized flow via interior point
algorithms. In Proceedings of the fortieth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages
451–460. ACM, 2008.
[6] Sanjoy Dasgupta and Anupam Gupta. An elementary proof of a theorem of johnson and lindenstrauss.
Random Structures & Algorithms, 22(1):60–65, 2003.
[7] Stephen Demko. Condition numbers of rectangular systems and bounds for generalized inverses. Linear
Algebra and its Applications, 78:199–206, 1986.
[8] Jittat Fakcharoenphol, Satish Rao, and Kunal Talwar. A tight bound on approximating arbitrary metrics
by tree metrics. In Proceedings of the thirty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pages
448–455. ACM, 2003.
[9] Yoav Freund and Robert E Schapire. Adaptive game playing using multiplicative weights. Games and
Economic Behavior, 29(1):79–103, 1999.
[10] William B Johnson and Joram Lindenstrauss. Extensions of lipschitz mappings into a hilbert space.
Contemporary mathematics, 26(189-206):1, 1984.
[11] Jonathan A Kelner, Yin Tat Lee, Lorenzo Orecchia, and Aaron Sidford. An almost-linear-time algorithm
for approximate max flow in undirected graphs, and its multicommodity generalizations. In Proceedings
of the Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 217–226. Society for
Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2014.
[12] Yin Tat Lee and Aaron Sidford. Path finding methods for linear programming: Solving linear programs
in o (vrank) iterations and faster algorithms for maximum flow. In Foundations of Computer Science
(FOCS), 2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on, pages 424–433. IEEE, 2014.
[13] Aleksander Madry. Fast approximation algorithms for cut-based problems in undirected graphs. In
Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2010 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on, pages 245–254.
IEEE, 2010.
[14] Yu Nesterov. Smooth minimization of non-smooth functions. Math. Program., 103(1):127–152, May
2005.
[15] Serge A. Plotkin, David B. Shmoys, and Eva Tardos. Fast approximation algorithms for fractional
packing and covering problems. Mathematics of Operations Research, 20:257–301, 1995.
[16] Jonah Sherman. Nearly maximum flows in nearly linear time. In Foundations of Computer Science
(FOCS), 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on, pages 263–269. IEEE, 2013.
[17] Daniel A. Spielman and Shang-Hua Teng. Nearly-linear time algorithms for preconditioning and solving
symmetric, diagonally dominant linear systems. CoRR, abs/cs/0607105, 2006.
11
| 8cs.DS
|
Re-embedding a 1-Plane Graph into a
Straight-line Drawing in Linear Time ⋆
Seok-Hee Hong1 and Hiroshi Nagamochi2
arXiv:1608.07662v2 [cs.CG] 2 Sep 2016
1
University of Sydney, Australia
[email protected]
2
Kyoto University, Japan
[email protected]
Abstract. Thomassen characterized some 1-plane embedding as the forbidden configuration such that a given 1-plane embedding of a graph is
drawable in straight-lines if and only if it does not contain the configuration [C. Thomassen, Rectilinear drawings of graphs, J. Graph Theory,
10(3), 335-341, 1988].
In this paper, we characterize some 1-plane embedding as the forbidden
configuration such that a given 1-plane embedding of a graph can be reembedded into a straight-line drawable 1-plane embedding of the same
graph if and only if it does not contain the configuration. Re-embedding
of a 1-plane embedding preserves the same set of pairs of crossing edges.
We give a linear-time algorithm for finding a straight-line drawable 1plane re-embedding or the forbidden configuration.
1
Introduction
Since the 1930s, a number of researchers have investigated planar graphs. In
particular, a beautiful and classical result, known as Fáry’s Theorem, asserts
that every plane graph admits a straight-line drawing [5]. Indeed, a straight-line
drawing is the most popular drawing convention in Graph Drawing.
More recently, researchers have investigated 1-planar graphs (i.e., graphs that
can be embedded in the plane with at most one crossing per edge), introduced
by Ringel [13]. Subsequently, the structure of 1-planar graphs has been investigated [4, 12]. In particular, Pach and Toth [12] proved that a 1-planar graph
with n vertices has at most 4n − 8 edges, which is a tight upper bound. Unfortunately, testing the 1-planarity of a graph is NP-complete [6, 11], however
linear-time algorithms are available for special subclasses of 1-planar graphs [1,
3, 7].
Thomassen [14] proved that every 1-plane graph (i.e., a 1-planar graph embedded with a given 1-plane embedding) admits a straight-line drawing if and
only if it does not contain any of two special 1-plane graphs, called the Bconfiguration or W-configuration, see Fig. 1.
⋆
Research supported by ARC Future Fellowship and ARC Discovery Project
DP160104148. This is an extended abstract. For a full version with omitted proofs,
see [9].
u2
outer face
u2
v1
u4
c
u1
outer face
c
s
u3
u3
u1
w4c
w3c
u1
u3
v2
(a)
u4
v3
c
w2c
w1c
u2
(c)
(b)
Fig. 1. (a) B-configuration with three edges u1 u2 , u2 u3 and u3 u4 and one crossing c
made by an edge pair {u1 u2 , u3 u4 }, where edge u2 u3 may have a crossing when the
configuration is part of a 1-plane embedding; (b) W-configuration with four edges u1 u2 ,
u2 u3 , v1 v2 and v2 v3 and two crossings c and s made by edge pairs {u1 u2 , v2 v3 } and
{u2 u3 , v1 v2 }, where possibly u1 = v1 and u3 = v3 ; (c) Augmenting a crossing c ∈ χ
made by edges u1 u3 and u2 u4 with a new cycle Qc = (u1 , w1c , u2 , w2c , u3 , w3c , u4 , w4c )
depicted by gray lines.
Recently, Hong et al. [8] gave an alternative constructive proof, with a lineartime testing algorithm and a drawing algorithm. They also showed that some
1-planar graphs need an exponential area with straight-line drawing.
We call a 1-plane embedding straight-line drawable (SLD for short) if it admits a straight-line drawing, i.e., it does not contain a B- or W-configuration
by Thomassen [14]. In this paper, we investigate a problem of “re-embedding”
a given non-SLD 1-plane embedding γ into an SLD 1-plane embedding γ ′ . For
a given 1-plane embedding γ of a graph G, we call another 1-plane embedding
γ ′ of G a cross-preserving embedding of γ if exactly the same set of edge pairs
make the same crossings in γ ′ .
More specifically, we first characterize the forbidden configuration of 1-plane
embeddings that cannot admit an SLD cross-preserving 1-plane embedding.
Based on the characterization, we present a linear-time algorithm that either
detects the forbidden configuration in γ or computes an SLD cross-preserving
1-plane embedding γ ′ .
Formally, the main problem considered in this paper is defined as follows.
Re-embedding a 1-Plane Graph into a Straight-line Drawing
Input: A 1-planar graph G and a 1-plane embedding γ of G.
Output: Test whether γ admits an SLD cross-preserving 1-plane embedding
γ ′ , and construct such an embedding γ ′ if one exists, or report the forbidden
configuration.
To design a linear-time implementation of our algorithm in this paper, we
introduce a rooted-forest representation of non-intersecting cycles and an efficient
procedure of flipping subgraphs in a plane graph. Since these data structure and
procedure can be easily implemented, it has advantage over the complicated
decomposition of biconnected graphs into triconnected components [10] or the
SPQR tree [2].
2
2
Plane Embeddings and Inclusion Forests
Let U be a set of n elements, and let S be a family of subsets S ⊆ U . We say
that two subsets S, S ′ ⊆ U are intersecting if none of S ∩ S ′ , S − S ′ and S ′ − S is
empty. We call S a laminar if no two subsets in S are intersecting. For a laminar
S, the inclusion-forest of S is defined to be a forest I = (S, E) of a disjoint union
of rooted trees such that (i) the sets in S are regarded as the vertices of I, and
(ii) a set S is an ancestor of a set S ′ in I if and only if S ′ ⊆ S.
Lemma 1. For a cyclic sequence (u1 , u2 , . . . , uδ ) of δ ≥ 2 elements, define an
interval (i, j) to be the set of elements uk with i ≤ k ≤ j if i ≤ j and (i, j) =
(i, δ) ∪ (1, j) if i > j. Let S be a set of intervals. A pair of two intersecting
intervals in S (when S is not a laminar) or the inclusion-forest of S (when S is
a laminar) can be obtained in O(δ + |S|) time.
Throughout the paper, a graph G = (V, E) stands for a simple undirected
graph. The set of vertices and the set of edges of a graph G are denoted by V (G)
and E(G), respectively. For a vertex v, let E(v) be the set of edges incident to
v, N (v) be the set of neighbors of v, and deg(v) denote the degree |N (v)| of
v. A simple path with end vertices u and v is called a u, v-path. For a subset
X ⊆ V , let G − X denote the graph obtained from G by removing the vertices
in X together with the edges in ∪v∈X E(v).
A drawing D of a graph G is a geometric representation of the graph in the
plane, such that each vertex of G is mapped to a point in the plane, and each
edge of G is drawn as a curve. A drawing D of a graph G = (V, E) is called
planar if there is no edge crossing. A planar drawing D of a graph G divides
the plane into several connected regions, called faces, where a face enclosed by
a closed walk of the graph is called an inner face and the face not enclosed by
any closed walk is called the outer face.
A planar drawing D induces a plane embedding γ of G, which is defined to
be a pair (ρ, ϕ) of the rotation system (i.e., the circular ordering of edges for each
vertex) ρ, and the outer face ϕ whose facial cycle Cϕ gives the outer boundary
of D. Let γ = (ρ, ϕ) be a plane embedding of a graph G = (V, E). We denote by
F (γ) the set of faces in γ, and by Cf the facial cycle determined by a face f ∈ F ,
where we call a subpath of Cf a boundary path of f . For a simple cycle C of G,
the plane is divided by C in two regions, one containing only inner faces and the
other containing the outer area, where we say that the former is enclosed by C
or the interior of C, while the latter is called the exterior of C. We denote by
Fin (C) the set of inner faces in the interior of C, by Ein (C) the set of edges in
E(Cf ) with f ∈ Fin (C), and by Vin (C) the set of end-vertices of edges in Ein (C).
Analogously define Fex (C), Eex (C) and Vex (C) in the exterior of C. Note that
E(C) = Ein (C) ∩ Eex (C) and V (C) = Vin (C) ∩ Vex (C).
For a subgraph H of G, we define the embedding γ|H of γ induced by H to be
a sub-embedding of γ obtained by removing the vertices/edges not in H, keeping
the same rotation system around each of the remaining vertices/crossings and
the same outer face.
3
2.1
Inclusion Forests of Inclusive Set of Cycles
In this and next subsections, let (G, γ) stand for a plane embedding of γ = (ρ, ϕ)
of a biconnected simple graph G = (V, E) with n = |V | ≥ 3.
Let C be a simple cycle in G. We define the direction of C to be an ordered
pair (u, v) with uv ∈ E(C) such that the inner faces in Fin (C) appear on the
right hand side when we traverse C in the order that we start u and next visit v.
For simplicity, we say that two simple cycles C and C ′ are intersecting if Fin (C)
and Fin (C ′ ) are intersecting.
Let C be a set of simple cycles in G. We call C inclusive if no two cycles in
C are intersecting, i.e., {Fin (C) | C ∈ C} is a laminar. When C is inclusive, the
inclusion-forest of C is defined to be a forest I = (C, E) of a disjoint union of
rooted trees such that:
(i) the cycles in C are regarded as the vertices of I, and
(ii) a cycle C is an ancestor of a cycle C ′ in I if and only if Fin (C ′ ) ⊆ Fin (C).
Let I(C) denote the inclusion-forest of C. For a vertex subset X ⊆ V , let
C(X) denote the set of cycles C ∈ C such that x ∈ V (C) for some vertex x ∈ X,
where we denote C({v}) by C(v) for short.
Lemma 2. For (G, γ), let C be a set ofP
simple cycles of G. Then any of the
following tasks can be executed in O(n + C∈C |E(C)|) time.
(i) Decision of the directions of all cycles in C;
(ii) Detection of a pair of two intersecting cycles in C when C is not inclusive,
and construction of the inclusion-forests I(C(v)) for all vertices v ∈ V when
C is inclusive; and
(iii) Construction of the inclusion-forest I(C) when C is inclusive.
2.2
Flipping Spindles
A simple cycle C of G is called a spindle (or a u, v-spindle) of γ if there are two
vertices u, v ∈ V (C) such that no vertex in V (C) − {u, v} is adjacent to any
vertex in the exterior of C, where we call vertices u and v the junctions of C.
Note that each of the two subpaths of C between u and v is a boundary path of
some face in F (γ).
Given (G, γ), we denote the rotation system around a vertex v ∈ V by ργ (v).
For a spindle C in γ, let J(C) denote the set of the two junctions of C.
Flipping a u, v-spindle C means to modify the rotation system of vertices in
Vin (C) as follows:
(i) For each vertex w ∈ Vin (C) − J(C), reverse the cyclic order of ργ (w); and
(ii) For each vertex u ∈ J(C), reverse the order of subsequence of ργ (u) that
consists of vertices N (u) ∩ Vin (C).
Every two distinct spindles C and C ′ in γ are non-intersecting, and they
always satisfy one of Ein (C) ∩ Ein (C ′ ) = ∅, Ein (C) ⊆ Ein (C ′ ), and Ein (C ′ ) ⊆
Ein (C). Let C be a set of spindles in γ, which is always inclusive, and let I(C)
denote the inclusion-forest of C.
4
When we modify the current embedding γ by flipping each spindle in C, the
resulting embedding γC is the same, independent from the ordering of the flipping
operation to the spindles, since for two spindles C and C ′ which share a common
junction vertex u ∈ J(C) ∩ J(C ′ ), the sets N (u) ∩ Vin (C) and N (u) ∩ Vin (C ′ ) do
not intersect, i.e., they are disjoint or one is contained in the other.
Define the depth of a vertex v ∈ V in I to be the number of spindles C ∈ C
such that v ∈ Vin (C) − J(C), and denote by p(v) the parity of depth of vertex
v, i.e., p(v) = 1 if the depth is odd and p(v) = −1 otherwise.
For a vertex v ∈ V , let C[v] denote the set of spindles C ∈ C such that
v ∈ J(C), and let γC[v] be the embedding obtained from γ by flipping all spindles in C[v]. Let revhσi mean the reverse of a sequence σ. Then we see that
ργC (v) = ργC[v] (v) if p(v) = 1; and ργC (v) = revhργC[v] (v)i otherwise. To obtain
the embedding γC from the current embedding γ by flipping each spindle in C, it
suffices to show how to compute each of p(v) and ργC[v] (v) for all vertices v ∈ V .
Lemma 3. Given (G, γ), let C be a set
P of spindles of γ. Then any of the following tasks can be executed in O(n + C∈C |E(C)|) time.
(i) Decision of parity p(v) of all vertices v ∈ V ; and
(ii) Computation of ργC[v] (v) for all vertices v ∈ V .
3
Re-embedding 1-plane Graph and Forbidden
Configuration
A drawing D of a graph G = (V, E) is called a 1-planar drawing if each edge
has at most one crossing. A 1-planar drawing D of graph G induces a 1-plane
embedding γ of G, which is defined to be a tuple (χ, ρ, ϕ) of the crossing system
χ of E, the rotation system ρ of V , and the outer face ϕ of D. The planarization
G(G, γ) of a 1-plane embedding γ of graph G is the plane embedding obtained
from γ by regarding crossings also as graph vertices, called crossing-vertices. The
set of vertices in G(G, γ) is given by V ∪χ. For a notational convenience, we refer
to a subgraph/face of G(G, γ) as a subgraph/face in γ.
Let γ = (χ, ρ, ϕ) be a 1-plane embedding of graph G. We call another 1-plane
embedding γ ′ = (χ′ , ρ′ , ϕ′ ) of graph G a cross-preserving 1-plane embedding of
γ when the same set of edge pairs makes crossings, i.e., χ = χ′ . In other words,
the planarization G(G, γ ′ ) is another plane embedding of G(G, γ) such that the
alternating order of edges incident to each crossing-vertex c ∈ χ is preserved.
To eliminate the additional constraint on the rotation system on each crossingvertex c ∈ χ, we introduce “circular instances.” We call an instance (G, γ) of
1-plane embedding circular when for each crossing c ∈ χ, the four end-vertices
of the two crossing edges u1 u3 and u2 u4 that create c (where u1 , u2 , u3 and
u4 appear in the clockwise order around c) are contained in a cycle Qc =
(u1 , w1c , u2 , w2c , u3 , w3c , u4 , w4c ) of eight crossing-free edges for some vertices wic ,
i = 1, 2, 3, 4 of degree 2, as shown in Fig. 1(c). By definition, c and each wic
not necessarily appear along the same facial cycle in the planarization G(G, γ).
For example, path (v, w, u) is part of such a cycle Qs for the crossing s in the
5
circular instance in Fig. 2(a), but c and w are not on the same facial cycle in
the planarization.
A given instance can be easily converted into a circular instance by augmenting the end-vertices of each pair of crossing edges as follows. In the plane graph,
G(G, γ), for each crossing-vertex c ∈ χ and its neighbors u1 , u2 , u3 and u4 that
appear in the clockwise order around c, we add a new vertex wic , i = 1, 2, 3, 4
and eight new edges ui wic and wic ui+1 , i = 1, 2, 3, 4 (where u5 means u1 ) to form
a cycle Qc of length 8 whose interior contains no other vertex than c.
Let H be the resulting graph augmented from G, and let Γ be the resulting
1-plane embedding of H augmented from γ. Note that |V (H)| ≤ |V (G)| + 4|χ|
holds. We easily see that if γ admits an SLD cross-preserving embedding γ ′ then
Γ admits an SLD cross-preserving embedding Γ ′ . This is because a straight-line
drawing Dγ ′ of γ ′ can be changed into a straight-line drawing DΓ ′ of some crosspreserving embedding Γ ′ of Γ by placing the newly introduced vertices wic within
the region sufficiently close to the position of c. We here see that cycle Qc can
be drawn by straight-line segments without intersecting with other straight-line
segments in Dγ ′ .
Note that the instance (G, γ ′ ) remains circular for any cross-preserving embedding γ ′ of γ. In the rest of paper, let (G, γ) stand for a circular instance
(G = (V, E), γ = (χ, ρ, ϕ)) with n ≥ 3 vertices and let G denote its planarization
G(G, γ). Fig. 2 shows examples of circular instances (G, γ), where the vertexconnectivity of G is 1.
As an important property of a circular instance, the subgraph G(0) with
crossing-free edges is a spanning subgraph of G and the four end-vertices of
any two crossing edges are contained in the same block of the graph G(0) . The
biconnectivity is necessary to detect certain types of cycles by applying Lemma 2.
outer face ϕ
outer face ϕ
u’
u’
w
s
c’ v
s
u
s’
s’
c
u
v
c’
c
z
v’
v’
(a)
(b)
Fig. 2. Circular instances (G, γ) with a cut-vertex u of G, where the crossing edges
are depicted by slightly thicker lines: (a) hard B-cycles C = (u, c, v, s) and C ′ =
(u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ), (b) hard B-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) and a nega-cycle C ′ = (u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ) whose
reversal is a hard B-cycle, where vertices u, v, u′ , v ′ ∈ V and crossings c, s, c′ , s′ ∈ χ.
6
3.1
Candidate Cycles, B/W Cycle, Posi/Nega Cycle, Hard/Soft
Cycle
For a circular instance (G, γ), finding a cross-preserving embedding of γ is effectively equivalent to finding another plane embedding of G so that all the current
B- and W-configurations are eliminated and no new B- or W-configurations
are introduced. To detect the cycles that can be the boundary of a B- or Wconfiguration in changing the plane embedding of G, we categorize cycles containing crossing vertices in G.
A candidate posi-cycle (resp., candidate nega-cycle) in G is defined to be a
cycle C = (u, c, v) or C = (u, c, v, s) in G with u, v ∈ V and c, s ∈ χ such that
the interior (resp., exterior) of C does not contain a crossing-free edge uv ∈ E
and any other crossing vertex c′ adjacent to both u and v.
outer face ϕ
ϕ
u
e
c’
v
(a) C C p
c
s
c’
ϕ
ϕ
u
c’
c
e
c
v
v
(c) C C n
(b) C C p
u
u
c’
c
s
v
(d) C C n
Fig. 3. Candidate posi- and nega-cycles C = (u, c, v) and C = (u, c, v, s) in G, where
white circles represent vertices in V while black ones represent crossings in χ: (a)
candidate posi-cycle of length 3, (b) candidate posi-cycle of length 4, (c) candidate
nega-cycle of length 3, and (d) candidate nega-cycle of length 4.
Fig. 3(a)-(b) and (c)-(d) illustrate candidate posi-cycles and candidate negacycles, respectively. Let C p and C n be the sets of candidate posi-cycles and candidate nega-cycles, respectively. By definition we see that the set C p ∪ C n ∪ {Cf |
f ∈ F (γ)} is inclusive, and hence |C p ∪ C n ∪ {Cf | f ∈ F (γ)}| = O(n).
A candidate posi-cycle C with C = (u, c, v) (resp., C = (u, c, v, s)) is called
a B-cycle if
(a)-(B): the exterior of C contains no vertices in V − {u, v} adjacent to c (resp.,
contains exactly one vertex in V − {u, v} adjacent to c or s).
Note that uv ∈ E when C = (u, c, v) is a B-cycle, as shown in Fig. 4(a).
Fig. 4(b) and (d) illustrate the other types of B-cycles.
A candidate posi-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) is called a W-cycle if
(a)-(W): the exterior of C contains no vertices in V − {u, v} adjacent to c or s.
Fig. 4(c) and (e) illustrate W-cycles.
Let CW (resp., CB ) be the set of W-cycles (resp., B-cycles) in γ. Clearly a
W-cycle (resp., B-cycle) gives rise to a W-configuration (resp., B-configuration).
7
outer face ϕ
ϕ
u
e
c
(a) C C B-C+
c
v
(f) C C-
v
(b) C C B-C+
(c) C C W-C+
c
c
v
(e) C C W C+
ϕ
u
u
c
c
s
v
(h) C C n-C-
(g) C C-
c
v
s
v
u
s
(d) C C B C+
ϕ
u
ϕ
u
s
c
s
s
ϕ
u
v
ϕ
u
s
c
s
v
ϕ
ϕ
u
v
(i) C C n-C-
Fig. 4. Illustration of types of cycles C = (u, c, v) and C = (u, c, v, s) in G, where white
circles represent vertices in V while black ones represent crossings in χ: (a) B-cycle of
length 3, which is always soft, (b) soft B-cycle of length 4, (c) soft W-cycle, (d) hard
B-cycle of length 4, (e) hard W-cycle, (f) nega-cycle whose reversal is a hard B-cycle,
(g) nega-cycle whose reversal is a hard W-cycle, (h) candidate nega-cycle of length 4
that is not a nega-cycle whose reversal is a hard B-cycle, and (i) candidate nega-cycle
of length 4 that is not a nega-cycle whose reversal is a hard W-cycle.
Conversely, by choosing a W-configuration (resp., B-configuration) so that the
interior is minimal, we obtain a W-cycle (resp., B-cycle). Hence we observe that
the current embedding γ admits a straight-line drawing if and only if CW = CB =
∅.
A W- or B-cycle C is called hard if
(b): length of C is 4, and the interior of C = (u, c, v, s) contains no inner face f
whose facial cycle Cf contains both vertices u and v, i.e., some path connects c
and s without passing through u or v.
On the other hand, a W- or B-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) of length 4 that does not
satisfy condition (b) or a B-cycle of length 3 is called soft. We also call a hard
B- or W-cycle a posi-cycle.
Fig. 4(d) and (e) illustrate a hard B-cycle and a hard W-cycles, respectively,
whereas Fig. 4(a) and (b) (resp., (c)) illustrate soft B-cycles (resp., a soft Wcycle).
A cycle C = (u, c, v, s) is called a nega-cycle if it becomes a posi-cycle when
an inner face in the interior of C is chosen as the outer face. In other words,
a nega-cycle is a candidate nega-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) of length 4 that satisfies
the following conditions (a’) and (b’), where (a’) (resp., (b’)) is obtained from
the above conditions (a)-(B) and (a)-(W) (resp., (b)) by exchanging the roles of
“interior” and “exterior”:
(a’): the interior of C contains at most one vertex in V − {u, v} adjacent to c
or s; and
8
(b’): the exterior of C contains no face f whose facial cycle Cf contains both
vertices u and v.
Fig. 4(f) and (g) illustrate nega-cycles, whereas Fig. 4(h) and (i) illustrate
candidate nega-cycles that are not nega-cycles.
Let C + (resp., C − ) denote the set of posi-cycles (resp., nega-cycles) in γ. By
definition, it holds that C + ⊆ CW ∪ CB ⊆ C p and C − ⊆ C n .
3.2
Forbidden Cycle Pairs
We define a forbidden configuration that characterizes 1-plane embeddings, which
cannot be re-embedded into SLD ones. A forbidden cycle pair is defined to
be a pair {C, C ′ } of a posi-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) and a posi- or nega-cycle
C ′ = (u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ) in G with u, v, u′ , v ′ ∈ V and c, s, c′ , s′ ∈ χ to which G has a
u, u′ -path P1 and a v, v ′ -path P2 such that:
(i) when C ′ ∈ C + , paths P1 and P2 are in the exterior of C and C ′ , i.e., V (P1 ) −
{u, u′ }, V (P2 ) − {v, v ′ } ⊆ Vex (C) ∩ Vex (C ′ ), where C and C ′ cannot have any
common inner face; and
(ii) when C ′ ∈ C − , paths P1 and P2 are in the exterior of C and the interior
of C ′ , i.e., V (P1 ) − {u, u′ }, V (P2 ) − {v, v ′ } ⊆ Vex (C) ∩ Vin (C ′ ), where C is
enclosed by C ′ .
In (i) and (ii), P1 and P2 are not necessary disjoint, and possibly one of them
consists of a single vertex, i.e., u = u′ or v = v ′ .
The pair of cycles C and C ′ in Fig. 5(a) (resp., Fig. 5(b)) is a forbidden cycle
pair, because there is a pair of a u, u′ -path P1 = (u, x, z, y, u′ ) and a v, v ′ -path
P2 = (v, x′ , z, y ′ , v ′ ) that satisfy the above conditions (i) (resp., (ii)). Note that
the pair of cycles C and C ′ in Fig. 2(a)-(b) is not forbidden cycle pair, because
there are no such paths.
Our main result of this paper is as follows.
Theorem 1. A circular instance (G, γ) admits an SLD cross-preserving embedding if and only if it has no forbidden cycle pair. Finding an SLD cross-preserving
embedding of γ or a forbidden cycle pair in G can be computed in linear time.
Proof of necessity: The necessity of the theorem follows from the next
lemma.
For a cycle C = (u, c, v, s) ∈ C + (resp., C − ) with u, v ∈ V and c, s ∈ χ in
G, we call a vertex z ∈ V an in-factor of C if the exterior of C ∈ C + (resp.,
the interior of C ∈ C − ) has a z, u-path Pz,u and a z, v-path Pz,v , i.e., V (Pz,u −
{u}) ∪ V (Pz,v − {v}) is in Vex (C) (resp., Vin (C)). Paths Pz,u and Pz,v are not
necessarily disjoint.
Lemma 4. Given G = G(G, γ), let γ ′ be a cross-preserving embedding of γ.
Then:
(i) Let z ∈ V be an in-factor of a cycle C ∈ C + ∪ C − in G. Then cycle C is a
posi-cycle (resp., a nega-cycle) in G(G, γ ′ ) if and only if z is in the exterior
(resp., interior) of C in γ ′ ;
9
outer face ϕ
outer face ϕ
u’
y
u’
u
x
u
x
y
c’
s’
s
z
c
z
s’
s
x’
x’
v
v’
c’
c
y’
v
y’
v’
(a)
(b)
Fig. 5. Illustration of circular instances (G, γ) with a cut-vertex z of G, where the
crossing edges are depicted by slightly thicker lines: (a) forbidden cycle pair with hard
B-cycles C = (u, c, v, s) and C ′ = (u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ) (b) forbidden cycle pair with a hard
B-cycle C = (u, c, v, s) and a nega-cycle C ′ = (u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ) whose reversal is a hard
B-cycle, where vertices u, v, u′ , v ′ ∈ V and crossings c, s, c′ , s′ ∈ χ.
(ii) For a forbidden cycle pair {C, C ′ }, one of C and C ′ is a posi-cycle in G(G, γ ′ )
(hence any cross-preserving embedding of γ contains a B- or W-configuration
and (G, γ) admits no SLD cross-preserving embedding).
Proof of sufficiency: In the rest of paper, we prove the sufficiency of
Theorem 1 by designing a linear-time algorithm that constructs an SLD crosspreserving embedding of an instance without a forbidden cycle pair.
4
Biconnected Case
In this section, (G, γ) stands for a circular instance such that the vertex-connectivity
of the plane graph G is at least 2. In a biconnected graph G, any two posi-cycles
C = (u, c, v, s), C ′ = (u′ , c′ , v ′ , s′ ) ∈ C + with u, v, u′ , v ′ ∈ V give a forbidden
cycle pair if they do not share an inner face, because there is a pair of u, u′ -path
and v, v ′ -path in the exterior of C and C ′ . Analogously any pair of a posi-cycle
C and a nega-cycle C ′ such that C ′ encloses C is also a forbidden cycle pair in
a biconnected graph G.
To detect such a forbidden pair in G in linear time, we first compute the sets
Cp , Cn , CW , CB , C + and C − in γ in linear time by using the inclusion-forest from
Lemma 2.
Lemma 5. Given (G, γ), the following in (i)-(iv) can be computed in O(n) time.
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
The sets Cp , Cn and the inclusion-forest I of Cp ∪ Cn ∪ {Cf | f ∈ F (γ)};
The sets CW and CB ;
The sets C + , C − and the inclusion-forest I ∗ of C + ∪ C − ; and
A set {fC | C ∈ (CW ∪CB )− C + } such that fC is an inner face in the interior
of a soft B- or W-cycle C with V (Cf ) ⊇ V (C).
10
Given (G, γ), a face f ∈ F (γ) is called admissible if all posi-cycles enclose f
but no nega-cycle encloses f . Let A(γ) denote the set of all admissible faces in
F (γ).
Lemma 6. Given (G, γ), it holds A(γ) 6= ∅ if and only if no forbidden cycle
pair exists in γ. A forbidden cycle pair, if one exists, and A(γ) can be obtained
in O(n) time.
By the lemma, if (G, γ) has no forbidden cycle pair, i.e., A(γ) 6= ∅, then any
new embedding obtained from γ by changing the outer face with a face in A(γ)
is a cross-preserving embedding of γ which has no hard B- or W-cycle.
4.1
Eliminating Soft B- and W-cycles
Suppose that we are given a circular instance (G, γ) such that G is biconnected
and C + = ∅. We now show how to eliminate all soft B- and W-cycles in G in linear
time using the inclusion-forest from Lemma 2 and the spindles from Lemma 3.
Lemma 7. Given (G, γ) with C + = ∅, there exists an SLD cross-preserving
embedding γ ′ = (χ, ρ′ , ϕ′ ) of γ such that V (Cϕ′ ) ⊇ V (Cϕ ) for the facial cycle
Cϕ (resp., Cϕ′ ) of the outer face ϕ (resp., ϕ′ ), which can be constructed in O(n)
time.
Given an instance (G, γ) with a biconnected graph G, we can test whether it
has either a forbidden cycle pair or an admissible face by Lemmas 5 and 6. In
the former, it cannot have an SLD cross-preserving embedding by Lemma 4. In
the latter, we can eliminate all hard B- and W-cycles by choosing an admissible
face as a new outer face, and then eliminate all soft B- and W-cycles by a flipping
procedure based on Lemma 7. All the above can be done in linear time.
To treat the case where the vertex-connectivity of G is 1 in the next section,
we now characterize 1-plane embeddings that can have an SLD cross-preserving
embedding such that a specified vertex appears along the outer boundary. For
a vertex z ∈ V in a graph G, we call a 1-plane embedding γ of G z-exposed if
vertex z appears along the outer boundary of γ. We call (G, γ) z-feasible if it
admits a z-exposed SLD cross-preserving embedding γ ′ of γ.
Lemma 8. Given (G, γ) such that A(γ) 6= ∅, let z be a vertex in V . Then:
(i) The following conditions are equivalent:
(a) γ admits no z-exposed SLD cross-preserving embedding;
(b) A(γ) contains no face f with z ∈ V (Cf ); and
(c) G has a posi- or nega-cycle C to which z is an in-factor;
(ii) A z-exposed SLD cross-preserving embedding or a posi- or nega-cycle C to
which z is an in-factor can be computed in O(n) time.
11
5
One-connected Case
In this section, we prove the sufficiency of Theorem 1 by designing a linear-time
algorithm claimed in the theorem. Given a circular instance (G, γ), where G may
be disconnected, obviously we only need to test each connected component of
G separately to find a forbidden cycle pair. Thus we first consider a circular
instance (G, γ) such that the vertex-connectivity of G is 1; i.e., G is connected
and has some cut-vertices.
A block B of G is a maximal biconnected subgraph of G. For a biconnected
graph G, we already know how to find a forbidden cycle pair or an SLD crosspreserving embedding from the previous section. For a trivial block B with
|V (B)| = 2, there is nothing to do. If some block B of G with |V (B)| ≥ 3 contains a forbidden cycle pair, then (G, γ) cannot admit any SLD cross-preserving
embedding by Lemma 4.
We now observe that G may contain a forbidden cycle pair even if no single
block of G has a forbidden cycle pair.
Lemma 9. For a circular instance (G, γ) such that the vertex-connectivity of
G is 1, let B1 and B2 be blocks of G and let P1,2 be a z1 , z2 -path of G with the
minimum number of edges, where V (Bi ) ∩ V (P1,2 ) = {zi } for each i = 1, 2. If
γ|Bi has a posi- or nega-cycle Ci to which zi is an in-factor for each i = 1, 2,
then {C1 , C2 } is a forbidden cycle pair in G.
For a linear-time implementation, we do not apply the lemma for all pairs of
blocks in B. A block of G is called a leaf block if it contains only one cut-vertex
of G, where we denote the cut-vertex in a leaf block B by vB . Without directly
searching for a forbidden cycle pair in G, we use the next lemma to reduce a
given embedding by repeatedly removing leaf blocks.
Lemma 10. For a circular instance (G, γ) such that the vertex-connectivity of
G = G(G, γ) is 1 and a leaf block B of G such that γ|B is vB -feasible, let H =
G−(V (B)−{vB }) be the graph obtained by removing the vertices in V (B)−{vB }.
Then
(i) The instance (H, γ|H ) is circular; and
∗
(ii) If (H, γ|H ) admits an SLD cross-preserving embedding γH
, then an SLD
∗
cross-preserving embedding γ of γ can be obtained by placing a vB -exposed
∗
SLD cross-preserving embedding γB
of γ|B within a space next to the cut∗
vertex vB in γH .
Given a circular instance (G, γ) such that G = G(G, γ) is connected, an
algorithm Algorithm Re-Embed-1-Plane for Theorem 1 is designed by the
following three steps.
The first step tests whether G has a block B such that γ|B has a forbidden
cycle pair, based on Lemma 8. If one exists, the algorithm outputs a forbidden
cycle pair and halts.
After the first step, no block has a forbidden cycle pair. In the current circular
instance (G, γ), one of the following holds:
12
(i) the number of blocks in G is at least two and there is at most one leaf block
B such that γ|B is not vB -feasible;
(ii) G has two leaf blocks B and B ′ such that γ|B is not vB -feasible and γ|B ′ is
not vB ′ -feasible; and
(iii) the number of blocks in G is at most one.
In (ii), vB is an in-factor of a cycle C in γ|B and vB ′ is an in-factor of a
cycle C ′ in γ|B ′ by Lemma 8, and we obtain a forbidden cycle pair {C, C ′ } by
Lemma 9. Otherwise if (i) holds, then we can remove all leaf blocks B such that
γ|B is not vB -feasible by Lemma 10. The second step keeps removing all leaf
blocks B such that γ|B is not vB -feasible until (ii) or (iii) holds to the resulting
embedding. If (i) occurs, then the algorithm outputs a forbidden cycle pair and
halts.
When all the blocks of G can be removed successfully, say in an order of
B 1 , B 2 , . . . , B m , the third step constructs an embedding with no B- or Wcycles by starting with such an SLD embedding of B m and by adding an SLD
embedding of B i to the current embedding in the order of i = m−1, m−2, . . . , 1.
By Lemma 10, this results in an SLD cross-preserving embedding of the input
instance (G, γ).
∗
Note that we can obtain an SLD cross-preserving embedding γH
1 of γ in the
third step when the first and second step did not find any forbidden cycle pair.
Thus the algorithm finds either an SLD cross-preserving embedding of γ or a
forbidden cycle pair. This proves the sufficiency of Theorem 1.
By the time complexity result from Lemma 8, we see that the algorithm can
be implemented in linear time.
References
1. Auer, C., Bachmaier, C., Brandenburg, F. J. , Gleißner, A., Hanauer, K., Neuwirth
D., Reislhuber J.: Outer 1-Planar Graphs, Algorithmica, 74(4), 1293–1320 (2016)
2. Di Battista G., Tamassia R.: On-line Planarity Testing, SIAM J. on Comput.,
25(5), 956–997 (1996)
3. Eades, P., Hong S-H., Katoh N., Liotta, G. Schweitzer P., Suzuki Y.: A linear Time
Algorithm for Testing Maximal 1-planarity of Graphs with a Rotation System,
Theor. Comput. Sci., 513, 65–76 (2013)
4. Fabrici I., Madaras T.: The Structure of 1-planar Graphs, Discrete Mathematics,
307(7-8), 854–865 (2007)
5. Fáry I. : On straight line representations of planar Graphs, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged,
11, 229–233 (1948)
6. Grigoriev A., Bodlaender H.: Algorithms for Graphs embeddable with few crossings
per edge, Algorithmica, 49(1), 1–11 (2007)
7. Hong S-H., Eades P., Katoh N., Liotta G., Schweitzer P., Suzuki Y.: A linear-time
Algorithm for Testing Outer-1-planarity, Algorithmica, 72(4), 1033–1054 (2015)
8. Hong S-H., Eades P., Liotta G., Poon S.: Fary’s Theorem for 1-planar Graphs,
In: J. Gudmundsson, J., J. Mestre J., Viglas T. (eds.) COCOON 2012 LNCS, vol.
7434, pp. 335–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
13
9. Hong S-H, Nagamochi H.: Re-embedding a 1-Plane Graph into a Straight-line
Drawing in Linear Time, Technical Report TR 2016-002, Department of Applied
Mathematics and Physics, Kyoto University (2016)
10. Hopcroft J. E., Tarjan R. E.: Dividing a Graph into Triconnected Components,
SIAM J. on Comput., 2, 135–158 (1973)
11. Korzhik V. P., Mohar B.: Minimal Obstructions for 1-immersions and Hardness of
1-planarity Testing, J. Graph Theory, 72(1), 30–71 (2013)
12. Pach J., Toth G.: Graphs Drawn with Few Crossings per Edge, Combinatorica,
17(3), 427–439 (1997)
13. Ringel G.: Ein Sechsfarbenproblem auf der Kugel, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hamb.,
29, 107–117 (1965)
14. Thomassen C.: Rectilinear Drawings of Graphs, J. Graph Theory, 10(3), 335–341
(1988)
14
| 8cs.DS
|
Action selection in growing state spaces: Control of Network
Structure Growth
arXiv:1606.07777v2 [cs.SI] 27 Dec 2016
Dominik Thalmeier1 , Vicenç Gómez 2 , and Hilbert J. Kappen 1
1
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands
2
Department of Information and Communication Technologies
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Barcelona, Spain
Abstract
The dynamical processes taking place on a network depend on its topology. Influencing the growth process of a network therefore has important implications on such
dynamical processes. We formulate the problem of influencing the growth of a network
as a stochastic optimal control problem in which a structural cost function penalizes undesired topologies. We approximate this control problem with a restricted class of control
problems that can be solved using probabilistic inference methods. To deal with the increasing problem dimensionality, we introduce an adaptive importance sampling method
for approximating the optimal control. We illustrate this methodology in the context of
formation of information cascades, considering the task of influencing the structure of a
growing conversation thread, as in Internet forums. Using a realistic model of growing
trees, we show that our approach can yield conversation threads with better structural
properties than the ones observed without control.
Keywords: control, complex Networks, sampling, conversation threads
1
Introduction
Many complex systems can be described as dynamic processes which are characterized by
the topology of an underlying network. Examples of such systems are human interaction
networks, where the links may represent transmitting opinions Olfati-Saber et al. [2007],
Dai and Mesbahi [2011], Centola and Baronchelli [2015], habits Centola [2010], Farajtabar
et al. [2014], money Gai and Kapadia [2010], Amini et al. [2016], Giudici and Spelta [2016]
or viruses Pastor-Satorras and Vespignani [2001], Eguı́luz and Klemm [2002]. Being able to
control, or just influence in some way, the dynamics of such complex networks may lead to
important progress, for example, avoiding financial crises, preventing epidemic outbreaks or
maximizing information spread in marketing campaigns.
The control of the dynamics on networks is a very challenging problem that has attracted
significant interest recently Liu et al. [2011], Cornelius et al. [2013], Gao et al. [2014], Yan et al.
[2015]. Existing approaches typically consider network controllability as the controllability of
1
the dynamical system induced by the underlying network structure. While it is agreed that
network controllability critically depends on the network structure, the problem of how to
control the network structure itself while it is evolving remains open.
The network structure is determined by the dynamics of addition and deletion of nodes
and links over time. In this paper, we address the problem of influencing this dynamics in
the framework of stochastic optimal control. The standard way to address these problems
is through the Bellman equation and dynamic programming. Dynamic programming is only
feasible in small problems and requires approximations when the state and action spaces are
large. In the setting of network growth, this problem is more severe, since the state space
increases (super-)exponentially with the number of nodes.
In order to deal with this curse of dimensionality, we propose to approximate the network
growth control problem by a special class of stochastic optimal control problems, known
as Kullback-Leibler (KL) control or Linearly-Solvable Markov Decision Problems (LMDPs)
Todorov [2009], Kappen et al. [2012]. For this class of problems, one can use efficient adaptive
importance sampling methods that scale well in high dimensions. The optimal solution for
the KL-control problem tends to be sparse, so that only a few next states become relevant,
effectively reducing the branching factor of the original problem. The obtained solution of
the KL-control problem is then used to compute the optimal action in the original problem
that does not belong to the KL-control class.
In the next section we present our proposed general methodology. We then apply it to
a realistic problem: influencing the growth process of cascades in online forums, in order
to maximize structural network measures that are connected to the quality of an online
conversation thread. We conclude the paper with a discussion.
2
Optimal Network Growth as a Control Problem
We now formulate the network growth control problem as a stochastic optimal control problem. Let
xt ∈ X , with X being the set of all possible network structures, denote the growing structure (state)
of the network at time t and let P (x0 |x, u) describe the network dynamics, where the control variable
u ∈ U denotes possible actions we can perform in order to manipulate the network. Let us label the
default action, which means not interacting with the system, with u = 0. We denote the corresponding
dynamics without control as the uncontrolled process p(x0 |x) := P (x0 |x, u = 0).
At each time-step t, we incur an arbitrary cost function on the network state r(x, t) which is
assigned when the state is reached. The state cost r(x, t) penalizes network structures that are not
convenient in the particular context under consideration. For example, if one wants to favour networks
with large average clustering coefficient C(x), then r(x, t) = −C(x). Alternatively, one can consider
more complex functions, such as the structural virality or Wiener index Mohar and Pisanski [1988],
as proposed recently Goel et al. [2015], to maximize the influence in a social network. In general,
any measure that can be (efficiently) computed from x fits the presented framework.
Our objective is to find the control function u(x, t) : X × N 7→ U which minimizes the total cost
over a time horizon T, starting at state x at initial time t = 0
* T
+
X
0
C (x, t = 0, u(·)) = r (x, 0) +
r xt0 , t
,
(1)
t0 =t+1
2
P (x1:T |x,u(·),t=0)
where the expectation is taken with respect to the probability P (x1:T |x, u(·), t = 0) over paths x1:T in
the state space, given state x at time Q
t = 0 using the control-function u(·). The probability of a path is
given by P (xt+1:T |x, u(·), t = 0) = T−1
s=t P (xs+1 |xs , u(xs , s), s).
Computing the optimal control can be done by dynamic programming Bertsekas [1995]. We
introduce the optimal cost-to-go
J(x, t) = min C (x, t, u(·)) ,
(2)
u(·)
which is an expectation of the cumulative cost starting at state x and time t and acting optimally
thereafter. This can be computed using the Bellman equation
J(x, t) = min r(x, t) + J(x0 , t + 1) P (x0 |x,u,t) .
(3)
u
From J(x, t), the optimal control is obtained by a greedy local optimization:
u∗ (x, t) = argminu r(x, t) + J(x0 , t + 1) P (x0 |x,u,t) .
(4)
In general, the solution to equation (3) can be computed recursively using dynamic programming
Bertsekas [1995] for all possible states. This is however infeasible for controlling network growth,
as the computation is of polynomial order in the number of states and the state space of networks
increases super-exponentially on the number of nodes. E.g. for directed unweighed networks, there
2
are 2N possible networks with N labelled nodes.
3
Approximating the network growth problem by a Kullback-Leibler
control problem
In this section we present our main approach, which first computes the optimal cost-to-go on a relaxed
problem and then uses it as a proxy for the original optimal cost-to-go. In the next subsection, we
introduce the class of KL-control problems that we use as a relaxation. We then illustrate KL-control
using a tractable example of tree growth. In subsection 3.3, we explain how can we approximate the
KL-control solution using the cross-entropy method. Finally, in subsection 3.4 we show how can we
use that result to compute the action selection in the original problem.
3.1
Kullback-Leibler control
In order to efficiently compute the optimal cost-to-go, we make the assumption that our controls directly specify the transition probabilities between two subsequent network structures, e.g. P (x0 |x, u(t)) ≈
u(x0 |x, t). Further, we define the natural growth process of the network (the uncontrolled dynamics)
as a Markov chain with transition probabilities p(x0 |x). Because our influence on the network dynamics is limited, we add a regularization term to the total cost defined in equation (1) that penalizes
deviations from p(x0 |x). The approximated control cost becomes
* T
+
X
λ
CKL
(x, t, u(·)) =λKL [u (xt+1:T |x, t) k p (xt+1:T |x, t)] + r (x, t) +
r xt0 , t0
, (5)
t0 =t+1
3
u(xt+1:T |x,t)
with the KL-divergence
KL [u (xt+1:T |x, t) k p (xt+1:T |x, t)] =
u (xt+1:T |x, t)
log
p (xt+1:T |x, t)
,
u(xt+1:T |x,t)
which measures the closeness of the two path distributions, p (xt+1:T |x, t) and u (xt+1:T |x, t). The
parameter λ thereby regulates the strength of this penalization.
λ w.r.t. the control u(x0 |x, t)
With this assumption, the control problem consisting in minimizing CKL
belongs to the KL-control class and has a closed form solution Todorov [2009], Kappen et al. [2012].
The probability distribution of an optimal path u∗KL (xt+1:T |x, t) that minimizes equation (5) is
u∗KL (xt+1:T |x, t) =
p (xt+1:T |x, t)
φ(xt+1:T ),
hφ(xt+1:T )ip(xt+1:T |x,t)
with
φ(xt+1:T ) := exp −λ
−1
T
X
(6)
!
0
r(xt0 , t ) .
(7)
t0 =t+1
Plugging this into equation (5) and minimizing gives the optimal cost-to-go
λ
JKL
(x, t) = r(x, t) − λ log hφ(xt+1:T )ip(xt+1:T |x,t) ,
(8)
which can be numerically approximated using paths sampled from the uncontrolled dynamics p(xt+1:T |x, t).
The optimal control corresponding to equation (4) corresponds to a state transition probability
distribution that is obtained by marginalization in equation (6). It is expressed in terms of the uncontrolled transition probability p(x0 |x) and the (exponentiated) optimal cost-to-go:
λ (x0 , t + 1)
X
JKL
∗
0
∗
0
0
uKL (x |x, t) =
uKL xt+1 = x , xt+2:T |x, t ∝ p(x |x) exp −
.
(9)
λ
x
t+2:T
This resembles a Boltzmann distribution with temperature λ where the optimal cost-to-go takes the
role of an energy. The effect of the temperature becomes clear: for high values of λ, u∗KL (x0 |x, t)
deviates only a little from the uncontrolled dynamics p(x0 |x), thus the optimal control has a weak
influence on the system. In contrast, for low values of λ, the exponential in equation (9) becomes very
λ (x0 , t + 1), suppressing the transition
pronounced for the state(s) x0 with the smallest cost-to-go JKL
0
probabilities to suboptimal states x . Thus the control has a very strong effect on the process. In
λ (x0 , t + 1) is not
the limit of λ going to zero, the controlled process becomes deterministic, if JKL
0
degenerate (meaning there is a unique state x which minimizes the optimal cost-to-go). In this case
the control is so strong that it overpowers the noise completely.
We thus approximate our original (possibly difficult) control problem as a KL-control problem,
parametrized by the temperature λ. The approximated optimal cost-to-go J(x0 , t + 1) of equation
λ (x0 , t + 1) of
(4) is replaced by the corresponding optimal cost-to-go of the KL-control problem JKL
equation (9) and used to compute the action selection in the original problem.
3.2
A Tractable Example
We now present a tractable example amenable for exact optimal control computation. This example
already belongs to the KL-control class, so no approximation is made. The purpose of this analysis it
4
to show how different values of the temperature λ may lead to qualitatively different optimal solutions
and other interesting phenomena.
Let’s consider a tree that grows at discrete time-steps, starting with the root node at time t = 0.
We represent the tree at time t as a vector xt = (x0 , x1 , ..., xt ), where xt indicates the label of the
parent of the node attached at time t. At every time-step, either the tree remains the same or a new
node is attached to it. The root node has label 1 and the label 0 is specially used to indicate that no
node was added at a given time-step (it is also the label of the parent of the root node). The nodes are
labelled in increasing order as they arrive to the tree, so that at time-step t, for a tree with k nodes,
k ≤ t, xt = 0, 1, . . . , k corresponds to the parent of node k + 1 if a node is added or zero otherwise.
Thus, the parent vector at time t = 1 is always x1 = (0, 1).
Our example is a finite horizon task of T = 10 time-steps and end-cost only. The end-cost
implements two control objectives: it prefers trees of large Wiener index while penalising trees with
many nodes (more than five, in this case). The Wiener index is the sum of the lengths of the shortest
paths between all nodes in a graph. It is maximal for a chain and minimal for a star.
The uncontrolled process is biased to the root: new nodes choose to link the root with probability
3/5 and uniformly otherwise. More precisely
(
3
for j = 1
p(xt+1 = j|xt ) = 5 2
(10)
for (j = 0) or j ∈ {2, . . . , kxt k0 }
5kxt k0
(
−Wiener(xt )δt,T if kxt k0 < 5
r(xt , t) =
(11)
δt,T
otherwise
where kxk0 denotes the number of non-zero elements in x and Wiener the (normalized) Wiener
index.
In this setting, the uncontrolled process p tends to grow trees with more than five nodes with many
of them attached to the root node, i.e. with low Wiener index. We want to influence this dynamics
so that the target configuration, a chain of five nodes (maximal Wiener index) is more likely to be
obtained.
Figure 1 (top) shows the state cost r of the final tree that results from choosing the most probable
control (MAP solution) as a function of the temperature λ. The exact solution is calculated using
dynamic programming Kappen et al. [2012]. We can differentiate three types of solutions, denoted as
A, B and C in the figure.
For low temperatures (region A) the control aims to fulfil both control objectives: to find a small
network with maximal Wiener index. The optimal strategy does not add nodes initially and then
builds a tree of maximal Wiener index (see inset of initial controls in left column of the figure). This
type of control (to wait while the target is far in the future) is reminiscent of the delayed choice
mechanism described previously Kappen [2005]. This initial waiting period makes sense because if
the chain of length 5 would be grown immediately, then at time 6 the size of 5 is already reached.
If now an additional node attaches, then the final cost would be zero. However if one first waits and
then grows the chain, an accidental node insertion before time 6 would not be so disastrous (actually
it may help), as one can then just wait until time 7 to start growing the rest of the tree. So delaying
the decision when to start growing the tree helps compensating accidental events.
For intermediate temperatures (region B), the initial control becomes less extreme, as we observe
if we compare the left plots between regions A and B. For λ ≈ 0.07, the solution that builds the tree
with maximal Wiener index is no longer optimal, since it deviates too much from the uncontrolled
5
Most Probable solution
0
state cost
C
-0.5
B
A
-1
∗
1
A
u
0.5
0
1
B
10 -2
(λ = 0.01)
0
u∗
1
10 -1
10 0
λ
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
4
5
1
0
2
1
6
1
2
2
3
7
1
1
2
4 2 4
3
3 5
8
9
u∗
(λ = 100)
3
1
0
1
1
2
6
1
2
7
3
3
1
8
2
10
2
1
4
9
3
4
2
1
5
10
3
1
C 0.5
0
1
(λ = 0.29)
0.5
0
10 1
1
2
1
2
1
3
2
4
3
2
1
4
4
5
3
3
4 2 4 2
3
3
2 4
2 4 2 5 1 9 5 1 10
2 4
1
1
5 1
9
8 67 8 6
5
5
7 6
1
6
6
7 8
7
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
Figure 1: Example of optimal control of tree growth. (Top): the state cost of the most probable
solutions as a function of the temperature λ. In region A, the optimal strategy waits until the last
time-steps and then grows a tree with maximal Wiener index. In region B, it builds a star of five
nodes. Finally, in region C, it follows the uncontrolled dynamics and builds a star of ten nodes.
(Left): for each region, the optimal probabilities u∗ (xt+1 |xt ) at t = 1 for the two actions which are
initially available: no node addition (0) and adding a node to the root (1). In regions A, B the optimal
control favours not adding a new node initially. The sequences on the right show how the tree grows.
When a new node is added to the tree, it is coloured in red.
dynamics. In region B, the control aims to build a network of five nodes or less, but no longer aims
to maximize the Wiener index. The control is characterized by an initial waiting period and the
subsequent growth of a tree of five nodes, which are in this case all attached to the root node.
Finally, for high temperatures (region C, λ > 0.4), the control essentially ignores the cost r and
the optimal strategy is to add one node to the root at every time-step, following the uncontrolled
process.
From these results we conclude that KL-control as a mechanism for controlling network growth
can capture complex phenomena such as transitions between qualitatively different optimal solutions
and delayed choice effects.
3.3
Sampling from the KL-optimally controlled dynamics
In this subsection, we explain how we can sample from the optimally controlled dynamics and thereby
λ (x, t) of equation (8).
obtain an estimate of the optimal cost-to-go JKL
The probability of an optimally controlled path, equation (6), corresponds to the product of the
uncontrolled dynamics by the exponentiated state costs. Hence a naive way to obtain samples from
the optimal dynamics, would consist in sampling paths from the uncontrolled dynamics p(x0 |x) and
6
weight them by their exponentiated state costs. Using these samples we can then compute expectations from the optimally controlled dynamics. We use that for any function f (xt+1:T ) we have:
+
*
φ(xt+1:T )
.
hf (xt+1:T )iu∗ (xt+1:T |x,t) = f (xt+1:T )
KL
hφ(xt+1:T )ip(xt+1:T |x,t)
p(xt+1:T |x,t)
More precisely, provided a learned model or a simulator of the uncontrolled dynamics p(x0 |x), we
(i)
(i)
generate M sample paths xt+1:T , i = 1, . . . , M from p(x0 |x) and compute the weights
denominator thereby gives with equation (8) an estimate of the optimal cost-to-go as
φ(xt+1:T )
φ̂
. The
M
hφ(xt+1:T )ip(xt+1:T |x,t)
1 X (i)
≈ φ̂ :=
φ xt+1:T .
M
i=1
This method can be combined with resampling techniques Douc and Cappé [2005], Hol et al. [2006]
opt,(i)
to obtain unweighted samples xt+1:T from the optimal dynamics (for the numerical methods in this
article, we have used structural resampling Douc and Cappé [2005], Hol et al. [2006]).
Using such a naive sampling method, however, can be inefficient, specially for low temperatures.
(i)
φ(x
)
t+1:T
are more or less equal, for low temperWhile for high temperatures λ basically all weights
φ̂
atures only a few samples with very large weights contribute to the approximation, resulting in very
poor estimates.
This is a standard problem in Monte Carlo sampling and can be addressed using the Cross-Entropy
(CE) method De Boer et al. [2005], Kappen and Ruiz [2016], which is an adaptive importance sampling algorithm that incrementally updates a baseline sampling policy or sequence of controls. Here
we propose to use the CE method in the discrete formulation and use a parametrized Markov process e
uω (x0 |x, t), with parameters ω, to approximate u∗KL . The CE method in our setting alternates the
following steps:
1. In the first step, the optimal control is estimated using M sample paths drawn from a parametrized
proposal distribution e
uω (x0 |x, t).
2. In the second step, the parameters ω are updated so that the proposal distribution becomes
closer to the optimal probability distribution.
As a proposal distribution e
uω (x0 |x, t), we use
JeKL (x0 , ω(t))
e
uω (x0 |x, t) ∝ p(x0 |x) exp −
λ
!
,
(12)
which has the same functional form as the optimally controlled transition probabilities in equation
(9). The KL-optimal cost-to-go is thereby approximated by a linear sum of time-dependent feature
vectors ψkt (x)
X
JeKL (x, ω(t)) =
ωk (t)ψkt (x).
(13)
k
The probability distribution of an optimally controlled path, equation (6), can be written as
!
(i)
T
p xt+1:T |x, t
X
(i)
(i)
(i) 0
∗
−1
uKL xt+1:T |x, t ∝ e
uω (xt+1:T |x, t)
exp −λ
r(xt0 , t ) .
(14)
(i)
e
uω (xt+1:T |x, t)
0
t =t+1
7
This shows that we can draw samples from the proposal distribution and reweight them with the
combined weights
(i)
p(xt+1:T |x, t) (i)
w(i) =
φ xt+1:T .
(i)
e
uω (xt+1:T |x, t)
The parameters ωk (t) of the importance sampler are initialized with zeros, which makes the initial
proposal distribution equivalent to the uncontrolled dynamics. The procedure requires the gradients
of e
uω (x0 |x, t) at each iteration. We describe the details of the CE method in A.
We measure the efficiency of an obtained proposal control using the effective sample size (EffSS),
which estimates how many effective samples can be drawn from the optimal distribution. Given M
samples with weights w(i) , the EffSS is given by
1 PM
(i) 2
i=1 w
M
EffSS = P
(15)
2 .
M
1
(i)
i=1 w
M
If the weights w(i) are all about the same value, the EffSS is high, indicating that many samples
contribute to statistical estimates using the weighted samples. If all weights are equal, the EffSS is
equal to the number of samples M. Conversely if the weights w(i) have a large spread, the EffSS is
low, indicating that only few independent samples contribute to statistical estimates. In the extreme
case, when one weight is much larger then all others, the EffSS approaches 1.
3.4
Action selection using the KL-approximation
λ , we need to select an action u ∈ U in the original
Once we have an estimate of the cost-to-go JKL
control problem, which is not of the KL-control type. We select the optimal action according to
D
E
λ
u∗ (x, t) ≈ argminu r(x, t) + JKL
(x0 , t + 1)
,
(16)
0
P (x |x,u,t)
λ (x
which requires the computation of JKL
t+1 , t + 1) for every reachable state xt+1 . In growing networks, the number of possible next states (the branching factor) increases quickly, and visiting all of
them soon becomes infeasible.
In this subsection we highlight an important benefit of using the KL-approximation as a relaxation of the original problem: the optimally controlled process tends to discard many irrelevant
states, specially for small values of λ. This means that u∗KL (x0 |x, t) is sparse on x0 (only a few next
λ (x0 , t) is very large for the corresponding x0 where
states are relevant for the task), since the cost JKL
u∗KL (x0 |x, t) ≈ 0.
opt
Let xt+1:T denote a trajectory sampled from the optimally controlled process, as described in the
previous section. We compute u∗KL (x0 |x, t) using:
û∗KL (x0 |x, t) = δxopt (t+1),x0
u∗KL (xt+1:T |x,t)
,
(17)
where xopt (t + 1) is the first element of the trajectory and δxopt (t+1),x0 is the Kronecker delta which is
equal one if xopt (t + 1) is equal to x0 , and zero otherwise.
We then compute the optimal cost using equation (9):
∗
ûKL (x0 |x, t)
λ
0
JKL (x , t + 1) ∼ − log
,
(18)
p(x0 |x, t)
8
Figure 2: Task illustration: example of an Internet news forum. News are posted periodically and
users can write comments either to the original post or to other user’s comments, forming a cascade of
messages. The figure shows an example of conversation thread taken from Slashdot about Google’s
AlphaGo. The control task is to influence the structure of the conversation thread (shown as a growing
tree in the top-right).
where we dropped a term which does not depend on x0 and therefore plays no role in the minimization
of equation (16). The KL-approximation can help reducing the branching factor because it needs only
λ (x0 , t + 1) only for the x0 where u∗ (x0 |x, t) > 0 and thus J λ (x0 , t)
a few samples to calculate JKL
KL
KL
has a finite value.
As mentioned earlier, u∗KL (x0 |x, t) tends to be more sparse for small values of λ, when the KLcontrol problem is less noisy. In B we provide analytical details of the two extreme conditions, when
λ is zero or infinite, respectively.
4
Application to Conversation Threads
We have described a framework for controlling growing graphs. We now illustrate this framework in
the context of growing information cascades. In particular, we focus on the task of controlling the
growth of online conversation threads. These are information cascades that occur, for example, in
online forums such as weblogs Leskovec et al. [2007], news aggregators Gómez et al. [2008] or the
synthesis of articles of Wikipedia Laniado et al. [2011]. In conversation threads, after an initial post
appears, different users react writing comments either to the original post or to comments from other
users.
9
Figure 3: Our proposed control mechanism: in addition to the the threaded conversation, we highlight
a comment (red node in the growing tree), suggested to be replied by the user. The choice of suggested
comment, shown at the bottom of the page, is calculated using the method described in section 3.3.
Figure 2 shows an example of a conversation thread, taken from Slashdot (www.slashdot.org).
Users see a conversation thread using a similar hierarchical interface.
The task we consider is to optimize the structure of the generated conversation thread while it
grows. The state is thus defined as a growing tree. We assume an underlying (not observed) population
of users that keep adding nodes to this tree. Since we can not control directly what is the node that will
receive the next comment, we propose the user interface as a control mechanism to influence indirectly
the growth process. This can be done in different ways, for example, manipulating the layout of the
comments. In our case, the control signal will be to recommend a comment (by highlighting it) to
which the next user can reply. Figure 3 illustrates such a mechanism. The action selection strategy
introduced in section 3.4 is used to select the comment to highlight. Our goal is thus to modify
the structure of a cascade in certain way while it evolves, by influencing its growth indirectly. It is
known that the structure of online threads is strongly related with the complexity of the underlying
conversation Gómez et al. [2008], Gonzalez-Bailon et al. [2010].
To fully define our control problem, we need to specify the structural cost function, the uncontrolled dynamics, i.e. the equivalent of equations (10) and (11) for this task, and a model of how an
action (highlighting a node) changes the dynamics. Globally, this application differs from the toy
example of subsection 3.2 in some important ways:
1. The state-space is larger (threads typically receive more than 10 comments).
2. We choose as state-cost function the Hirsch index (h-index), which makes the control task
10
highly non-trivial.
3. The original problem is not a KL-control problem. We use the action selection method described in section 3.4 to control the growth of the conversation thread.
4.1
Structural Cost Function
We propose to optimize the Hirsch index (h-index) as structural measure. In our context, a cascade
with h-index h has h comments each of which have received at least h replies. It is a sensible quantity
to optimize, since it measures how distributed the comments of users on previous comments are. A
high h-index prevents two extreme cases that occur in a rather poor conversation: the case where
a small number of posts attract most of the replies, thus there is no interaction, and the case with
deep chains, characteristic of a flame war of little interest for the community. Both cases have a low
h-index, while a high h-index spreads the conversation over multiple levels of the cascade.
The h-index is a function of the degree sequence of all nodes in the tree, where the degree of a
node is this case is the number of replies plus one, as there is also a link to the parent (replied comment
or post). Therefore we use the degree histogram as features ψkt (x) for the parametrized form of the
optimal cost-to-go, equation (13). That is, feature ψkt (x) is the number of nodes with degree k in the
tree x at time-step t. We model the problem as a finite horizon task with end-cost. Thus, the state cost
is defined as r(x, t) = −δt,T · h(x), where h(x) is the h-index of the tree x.
4.2
Uncontrolled Dynamics for Online Conversation Threads
As uncontrolled dynamics, we use a realistic model that determines the probability of a comment to
attract the replies of other users at any time, by means of an interplay between the following features:
• Popularity α: number of replies that a comment has already received.
• Novelty τ : the elapsed time since the comment appeared in the thread.
• Root node bias β: characterizes the level of trendiness of the main post.
Such a model has proven to be successful in capturing the structural properties and the temporal
evolution of discussion threads present in very diverse platforms Gómez et al. [2013]. Notice that
these features θ = (α, τ, β) should not be confused with the features ψkt (x) used to encode the costto-go.
We represent the conversation thread as a vector of parents xt = (x0 , x1 , ..., xt ). Given the current
state of the thread xt , the uncontrolled dynamics attaches a new node t + 1 to an existing node j with
probability
1
pθ (xt+1 = j|xt ) =
degj,t α + δj,1 β + τ t+1−j
(19)
Zt+1
with Zt+1 a normalization constant, degj,t the degree of node j at time t and δj,1 the Kronecker delta
function, so parameter β is only nonzero for the root.
Given a dataset composed of S threads D := {x(1) , . . . , x(S) } with respective sizes |x(k) |, k ∈
{1, . . . S}, the parameter vector θ can be learned by minimizing
(k)
− log L(D; θ) = −
S |x
X
X|
k=1 t=2
11
(k)
(k)
log pθ (xt+1 |xt ).
We learn the parameters using the Slashdot dataset, which consists of S = 9, 820 threads, containing
more than 2 · 106 comments among 93, 638 users. In Slashdot, the most relevant feature is the
preferential attachment, as detailed in Gómez et al. [2013]. This will have implications in the optimal
control solution, as we show later.
4.3
Control interaction
The control interaction is done by highlighting a single comment of the conversation. We assume
a behavioural model for the user inspired by Craswell et al. [2008], where the user looks at the
highlighted comment and decides to reply or not. For simplicity, we assume that the user chooses
the highlighted comment with a fixed probability p0 = α/(1 + α) and with probability 1 − p0 she
chooses to ignore it. If the highlighting of the comment is ignored, the thread grows according to the
uncontrolled process. Therefore, α parametrizes the strength of the influence the controller has on
the user. For α → ∞, we can fully control the behaviour and for α = 0, the thread evolves according
to the uncontrolled process. A typical control would have a small α as usually the influence of an
controlling agent on a social systems is weak.
4.4
Experimental Setup
To evaluate the proposed framework we use a simulated environment, without real users. We consider
a finite horizon task with T = 50 with the goal to maximize the h-index at end-time, starting from a
thread with a single node as initial condition. The state-space consists of 50! ≈ 364 states. The thread
grows in discrete time-steps. At each time-step, a new node is added to the thread by a (simulated)
user. For that, we first choose which node to highlight (optimal action) as described in section 3.4
using equation (16). We then simulate the user as described in section 4.3, so the highlighted node is
selected with probability p0 = α/(1 + α) as the parent of the new node. Otherwise, with probability
1 − p0 , the user ignores the highlighted node and the parent of the new node is chosen according to
the Slashdot model, equation (19). This is repeated until the end time.
4.5
Experimental Results
We first analyse the performance of the adaptive importance sampling algorithm described in section 3.3 for different fixed values of λ.
Figure 4 shows the effective sample size (EffSS), equation (15) as a function of the number of
iterations of the CE method. We observe that the EffSS increases to reach a stable value. As expected,
large temperature (easier) problems result in higher values of EffSS. We can also see that, even for
hard problems with low temperature, the obtained EffSS is significantly larger than zero, which allows
us to compute the KL-optimal control. In general, the curves are less smooth for smaller values of
λ, because a few qualitatively better samples dominate the EffSS, resulting in higher variance. On
the other hand we also observe that the EffSS never reaches 100%. This is expected, as this would
mean that our parametrized importance sampler perfectly resembles the optimal control, and this is
not possible due to the approximation error introduced by the use of features.
We can better understand the learned control by analysing the linear coefficients of the parametrized
optimal cost-to-go, equation (13), for this problem. Figure 5 shows the feature weights ωk (t), at different times t = 1, . . . , T, after convergence of the CE method. Feature k corresponds to the number
of nodes with degree k in the tree, after a new node arrives. The parent node to which the new node
12
100
λ=1
λ = 1/3
λ = 0.2
λ = 0.1
90
80
EffSS in %
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
20
40
60
80
Iteration
100
120
140
Figure 4: Evaluation of the inference step: The Effective sampling size (EffSS) increases after
several iterations of the cross-entropy method. As expected, large values of the temperature λ result
in higher values of EffSS. We use M = 105 samples to compute the EffSS. The EffSS is measured
here in percent of the maximum number of samples M .
feature weight forλ=0.2
0.1
5
10
0.05
15
0
Time
20
-0.05
25
30
-0.1
35
-0.15
40
-0.2
45
5
10
15
20
feature degree of parent
25
30
Figure 5: The learned importance sampler: The figure shows the time-dependent parameters of
the learned expected cost-to-go for λ = 0.2. Each pixel is the parameter of a feature at a certain time.
The features are the degrees of the parent node after the new child attaches. The colour represents the
weight of the parameter. Large negative weights (pixels in blue colour) stand for a low cost and thus
a desirable state, while large positive weights (red pixels) stand for high cost and thus undesirable
states. At all times there is a desirable degree which the parent should have and higher as well as
lower degrees are inhibited. This desirable degree is small at early times and becomes larger at later
times.
13
has attached is thereby the only node whose degree changes (the degree increases by 1). Thus a high
weight for a feature which measures the number of nodes with a certain degree k results in a low
probability of attaching to a node with degree k − 1. Conversely low, or large negative weights thus
correspond to nodes which have a high probability of becoming the parent of the next node which
is added. We observe that there is an intermediate preferred degree (large negative weight, in blue).
This is the preferred degree of the parent of the new node, and this preferred degree increases with
time, reaching a value of 5 at t = 50.
Does this strategy make sense? The maximum h-index of a tree of 50 nodes is 7, and it is achieved
if 6 nodes have exactly 7 children and one node has 8. However, achieving such a configuration
requires a very precise control. For example, increasing too much the degree of a node, say up to
9, prevents the maximum h-index to be reached, as there are not enough links left, due to the finite
horizon. Thus, in this setting, steering for the maximal possible h-index is not optimal. The controller
prefers all parents to have a degree of 5 and not less, but also not much more. As having more than
five parents with degree at least five will result in an h-index of 5 we conclude that the control seems
to aim for a target h-index of 5, while preventing wasting links to higher or lower degree nodes, which
would not contribute to achieve that target.
The interpretation of why the preferred degree increases with time involves the uncontrolled dynamics. Remember that the most relevant term in equation (19) for the considered dataset corresponds
to the preferential attachment, parametrized by α. This term boosts high-degree nodes to get more
links. If this happens, most of the links end up attached to a few parents, and this effect can only be
suppressed by a strong control. The controller prevents that self-amplifying effect by aiming initially
for an overall low degree, preventing a high impact of the preferential attachment. This keeps the
process controllable and allows for a more equal distribution of the links.
After having evaluated the sampling algorithm, we evaluate the proposed mechanism for actual
control of the conversation thread. As described in section 3.4, in our simulated scenario, we highlight
the node as the parent which minimizes the computed expected cost-to-go.
Figure 6 shows the evolution of the h-index using different control mechanisms. The blue curve
shows how the h-index changes under the uncontrolled dynamics. On average, it reaches a maximum
of about 3.7 after 50 time steps. In green, we show the evolution of the h-index under a KL-optimal
controlled case, for temperature λ = 0.2. As expected, we observe a faster increase, on average, than
using the uncontrolled dynamics. The maximum is about 4.7.
The red and black curves show the evolution of the h-index using the control mechanism described
λ of the KLin subsections 3.4 and 4.3, where we select actions using the expected cost-to-go JKL
optimal control with λ = 0.2, for α = 1 and α = 0.5, respectively. In both cases the obtained h-index
is even higher than the one obtained with the KL-control relaxation. Therefore, the objective for this
task, to increase the h-index, can be achieved through our action selection strategy. As expected, a
stronger interaction strength α = 1 leads to higher h-indices than a lower strength α = 0.5.
Finally, in Figure 7 we show examples of a real discussion thread from the dataset (Slashdot), a
thread generated from the learned model (uncontrolled process) and one resulting from applying our
action selection strategy. The latter has higher h-index.
5
Discussion
We have addressed the problem of controlling the growth process of a network using stochastic optimal control with the objective to optimize a structural cost that depends on the topology of the
14
6
p
5.5
u
max-costtogo α=1
5
max-costtogo α=0.5
4.5
h-index
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
1.5
1
0
5
10
15
20
25
time
30
35
40
45
50
Figure 6: Evaluation of the actual control: uncontrolled dynamics (blue), KL-optimally controlled
dynamics (green) action selection based control for α = 1 (red) and α = 0.5 (black). The KLoptimally controlled dynamics, which optimize the sum of the λ-weighted KL-term and the end cost,
shifts the final mean value from about 3.7 to about 4.7. The action selection based control, which
is aiming to optimize the end cost only, is able to shift the h-index to even higher values then the
KL-optimal control. For the controlled dynamics, λ = 0.2 for all three cases. To compute the control
in each time-step we sample 1000 trajectories. The statistics where computed using 1000 samples for
each of the three cases.
growing network. The main difficulty of such a problem is the exploding size of the state space,
which grows (super-)exponentially with the number of nodes in the network and renders exact dynamic programming infeasible.
We have shown that a convenient way to address this problem is using KL-control, where a
regularizer is introduced which penalizes deviations from the natural network growth process. One
advantage of this approach is that the optimal control can be solved by sampling. The difficulty of the
sampling is controlled by the strength of the regularization, which is parametrized by a temperature
parameter λ: for high temperatures the sampling is easy, while for low temperatures, it becomes hard.
This is in contrast to standard dynamic programming, whose complexity is directly determined by the
number of states and independent of λ.
In order to tackle the more challenging low temperature case, we have introduced a featurebased parametrized importance sampler and used adaptive importance sampling for optimizing its
parameters. This allows us to sample efficiently in the low temperature regime. For control problems
which cannot directly be formulated as KL-control problems, we have proposed to use the solution
of a related KL-control problem as a proxy to estimate the effective values of possible next network
states. These expected effective values are subsequently used in a greedy strategy for action selection
in the original control problem. This action selection mechanism benefits from the sparsity induced
by the optimal KL-control solution.
We have illustrated the effectiveness of our method on the task of influencing the growth of
15
Slashdot thread
Uncontrolled thread
Controlled thread
Figure 7: Examples of threads. A thread from the data (Slashdot), an uncontrolled thread generated
from the model and a controlled thread. The nodes that contribute to the h-index are coloured in
yellow. The h-index for the data and the uncontrolled thread is 4 and 6 for the controlled one.
conversation cascades. Our control seeks to optimize the structure of the cascade, as it evolves in
time, to maximize the h-index at a final time. This task is non-trivial and characterized by a sparse,
delayed reward, since the h-index remains constant during most of the time, and therefore a greedy
strategy is not possible.
Our approach for controlling network growth is inspired in recent approaches to optimal decisionmaking with information-processing constraints Todorov [2009], Tishby and Polani [2011], Kappen
et al. [2012], Theodorou and Todorov [2012], Rawlik et al. [2012]. The Cross-Entropy method has
been explored previously in the continuous case Kappen and Ruiz [2016]. The continuous formulation of this class of problems has been used in robotics, using parametrized policies Theodorou et al.
[2010], Levine and Koltun [2013], Gómez et al. [2014]. In economics, the question of altering social
network structure in order to optimize utility has been addressed mainly from a game theoretical point
of view, under the name of strategic network formation Jackson and Watts [2002], Bloch and Jackson
[2007]. To the best of our knowledge, the problem of network formation has not yet been addressed
from a stochastic optimal control perspective.
The standard approach to address the problem of controlling a complex, networked system is to
directly try to control the dynamics on the network Liu et al. [2011], Cornelius et al. [2013]. This
approach considers the classical notion of structural controllability as the capability of being driven
from any initial state to any desired final state within finite time. Optimal control in thus referred to
the situation where a network can be fully controlled using only one driving signal. This idea is also
prevalent in the influence maximization problem in social networks Kempe et al. [2003], Farajtabar
et al. [2014, 2015], which consists in finding the subset of driver (most influential) nodes in a network.
Since the controllability of the dynamics on the network depends crucially on the topology, several
works have considered the idea of changing the network structure is some way that favours structural
controllability.
For example, the perturbation approach introduced in Wang et al. [2012] looks for the minimum
16
number of links that needs to be added so that the perturbed network can be fully controlled using a
single input signal. In Hou et al. [2015], a method to enhance structural controllability of a directed
network by changing the direction of a small fraction of links is proposed. More recently, Wang et al.
[2016] analyzed node augmentation of directed networks while insisting that the minimum number
of drivers remains unchanged.
The main difference between our approach and these approaches is that, rather than considering
the controllability of the dynamical system on the underlying network, our optimal control task is
defined on the structure of the network itself, regardless of the dynamical system defined on it. In
some sense, our results complement these approaches. For example, one could use our optimal control
approach to shape the growth of the network in a way that the structural controllability, understood as
the state cost function, is optimized.
Acknowledgements
This project is co-financed by the Marie Curie FP7-PEOPLE-2012-COFUND Action, Grant agreement no: 600387, the Marie Curie Initial Training Network NETT, project N. 289146 and the Spanish
Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the Marı́a de Maeztu Units of Excellence Programme (MDM-2015-0502).
A
Adaptive Importance Sampling for KL-Optimal Control Computation using the Cross-Entropy method
Here we show how the time-dependent weights ωk (t) of the importance sampler are updated such
that e
uω (x0 |x, t) becomes closer to the optimal sampling distribution. This corresponds to the second
step of the Cross-Entropy method described in subsection 3.3. For clarity in the derivations, we will
replace p(x1:T |x, 0) and u∗KL (x1:T |x, 0) by p and u∗KL , respectively, in the expectations. The closeness
of the two distributions e
uω (x0 |x, t) and u∗KL (x0 |x, t) can be measured as the cross entropy between the
path x1:T probabilities under these two Markov processes:
u∗KL (x1:T |x, 0)
∗
KL [uKL (x1:T |x, 0) k e
uω (x1:T |x, 0)] = log
e
uω (x1:T |x, 0) u∗
KL
= − hlog e
uω (x1:T |x, 0)iu∗ + const. =: −D(ω),
KL
(20)
where the constant term hlog u∗KL (x1:T |x, 0)iu∗ is dropped.
KL
We minimize equation (20) by gradient descent. At iteration l, the gradient D(ω (l) ) with respect
to ωk (t) is given by
∂D(ω (l) )
=−
∂ωk (t)
∂
log e
uω(l) (x1:T |x, 0)
∂ωk (t)
u∗
KL
17
where
T−1
Y
1
JeKL (xt+1 , ω(t))
e
uω(l) (x1:T |x, 0) = p(x1:T |x, 0)
exp −
Z
λ
t=0
*T−1
!+
Y
JeKL (xt0 +1 , ω(t0 ))
Z=
exp −
λ
0
t =0
!
p
with the normalization constant Z. This leads to
*
!+
T−1 e
X
∂D(ω (l) )
∂
JKL (xt0 +1 , ω(t0 ))
log p(x1:T |x, 0) −
=−
− log Z
∂ωk (t)
∂ωk (t)
λ
0
(21)
u∗KL
t =0
where we can drop the first term as it is independent of ω(t). The second term can be evaluated using
the definition of JeKL , equation (13).
Further, plugging in Z we get
* *T−1
!+ +
Y
∂
JeKL (xt0 +1 , ω(t0 ))
∂D(ω (l) )
−1
t
=λ
ψk (xt+1 ) u∗ +
log
exp −
KL
∂ωk (t)
∂ωk (t)
λ
0
t =0
= λ−1 ψkt (xt+1 )
= λ−1 ψkt (xt+1 )
u∗KL
u∗KL
p
*T−1
Y
∂
JeKL (xt0 +1 , ω(t0 ))
log
exp −
∂ωk (t)
λ
t0 =0
*T−1
!+
Y
1 ∂
JeKL (xt0 +1 , ω(t0 ))
+
exp −
Z ∂ωk (t) 0
λ
+
t =0
u∗KL
!+
p
p
!+
0
e
0
1
JKL (xt +1 , ω(t ))
= λ−1 ψkt (xt+1 ) u∗ −
ψkt (xt+1 )
exp −
KL
Z
λ
0
t =0
p
= λ−1 ψkt (xt+1 ) u∗ − ψkt (xt+1 ) eu (x |x,0)
KL
ω (l) 1:T
D
E
p(x1:T |x,0)
t (x
φ
(x
)
ψ
)
1:T
k t+1
euω (x1:T |x,0)
e
uω(l) (x1:T |x,0)
D
E
= λ−1
− ψkt (xt+1 ) eu (x |x,0)
,
p(x1:T |x,0)
ω (l) 1:T
φ
(x
)
1:T
e
uω (x1:T |x,0)
*
T−1
Y
e
uω(l) (x1:T |x,0)
(22)
where we have used the estimates from the importance sampling step and equation (9).
The update rule for the parameters becomes
(l+1)
ωk
(l)
(t) = ωk (t) + η
∂D(ω (l) )
,
∂ωk (t)
for some learning rate η. Algorithm 1 summarizes the CE method applied to this context.
18
(23)
Algorithm 1 Cross-Entropy Method for KL-control
Require: importance sampler e
uω ,
feature space ψ(·),
number of samples M,
learning rate η
l←0
(l)
ωk (t) ← 0, Initialize weights for all k, t, l
(i)
xt+1:T ← draw M sample trajectories ∼ e
uω(l) , i = 1, . . . , M
repeat
(l) )
compute gradient ∂D(ω
∂ωk (t) using equation (21)
(l+1)
ωk
(l)
(l)
)
(t) ← ωk (t) + η ∂D(ω
∂ωk (t) for all k, t, l
(i)
xt+1:T ← draw M samples ∼ e
uω(l+1)
l ←l+1
until convergence
B
Analyzing the KL-optimal cost-to-go based action selection
We have introduced an action selection framework which is based on an approximation of the optimal
λ (x0 , t + 1) of a parametrized family of KL-control
cost-to-go J(x0 , t) by the optimal cost-to-go JKL
problems which share the same state cost r(x, t).
Why is this a good idea? Consider the two extreme cases where the temperature λ, which
parametrizes the family of equivalent KL-control problems, is zero or infinite, respectively.
Extreme case λ → 0 (zero temperature): The total cost in the KL-control problem becomes
equal to the total cost in the original control problem, equation (1), as the KL term vanishes. The
KL-optimal control becomes deterministic:
λ 0
(
J (x ,t+1)
λ (x0 , t + 1)
p(x0 |x) exp − KL λ
1 for x0 = argmin JKL
lim u∗KL (x0 |x, t) = lim
=
, (24)
λ→0
λ→0
Z
0 otherwise
where Z is a normalization constant.
Thus, for λ → 0, the KL-control problem becomes identical to the original problem if the system
is fully controllable, i.e. for every t, x and x̃ there is a ux̃ ∈ U such that p(x0 |x, t, ux̃ ) = δx̃,x0 .
Extreme case λ → ∞ (infinite temperature): For this case, using equation (8) we get
∞
λ
JKL
(x, t) = lim JKL
(x, t)
λ→∞
*
T
X
= r(x, t) − lim λ log exp −λ−1
λ→∞
*
= r(x, t) +
T
X
t0 =t+1
t0 =t+1
+
r(xt0 , t0 )
.
p(xt+1:T |x,t)
19
!+
r(xt0 , t0 )
p(xt+1:T |x,t)
Using equation (1) and the definition of the uncontrolled dynamics, we can write
* T
+
X
∞
JKL
(x, t) = r (x, t) +
r xt0 , t0
= C (x, t, 0) .
t0 =t+1
(25)
P (xt+1:T |x,0,t)
Thus, for λ → ∞, the KL-optimal cost-to-go becomes equal to the total cost in the original control
problem under the uncontrolled dynamics (using u = 0). Having this equation (16) can be written as
u∗ (x, t) ≈ argminu r(x, t) + C x0 , t + 1, 0 P (x0 |x,u,t) .
(26)
In this case, the action selection is equivalent to optimize an expected total cost assuming the
system will evolve according to the free dynamics in the future. Thus the infinite temperature control
can be used if one wants to guarantee that the obtained solution will not be worse than the solution
obtained with zero control. Choosing a lower λ, however, might in practice work better (as we also
have shown in section 4) but has no theoretical guarantee.
We can conclude that our action selection strategy is meaningful in the two extreme cases, λ → ∞
and λ → 0. Also this analysis suggests that, if the available set of actions u ∈ U offers a strong control
λ with a low temperature λ.
over the system dynamics, it is more convenient to use a JKL
References
H. Amini, R. Cont, and A. Minca. Resilience to contagion in financial networks. Mathematical
finance, 26(2):329–365, 2016.
D. P. Bertsekas. Dynamic programming and optimal control, volume 1. Athena Scientific Belmont,
MA, 1995.
F. Bloch and M. O. Jackson. The formation of networks with transfers among players. Journal of
Economic Theory, 133(1):83–110, 2007.
D. Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329(5996):
1194–1197, 2010.
D. Centola and A. Baronchelli. The spontaneous emergence of conventions: An experimental study
of cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(7):1989–1994, 2015.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418838112.
S. P. Cornelius, W. L. Kath, and A. E. Motter. Realistic control of network dynamics. Nature Communications, 4(1942), Jun 2013. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2939.
N. Craswell, O. Zoeter, M. Taylor, and B. Ramsey. An experimental comparison of click position-bias
models. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining,
pages 87–94. ACM, 2008.
R. Dai and M. Mesbahi. Optimal topology design for dynamic networks. In Decision and Control
and European Control Conference, 2011 50th IEEE Conference on, pages 1280–1285, 2011.
P.-T. De Boer, D. P. Kroese, S. Mannor, and R. Y. Rubinstein. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method.
Annals of operations research, 134(1):19–67, 2005.
20
R. Douc and O. Cappé. Comparison of resampling schemes for particle filtering. In Image and Signal
Processing and Analysis, 2005. ISPA 2005. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on,
pages 64–69. IEEE, 2005.
V. M. Eguı́luz and K. Klemm. Epidemic threshold in structured scale-free networks. Physical Review
Letters, 89(10):108701, Aug 2002.
M. Farajtabar, N. Du, M. Gomez-Rodriguez, I. Valera, H. Zha, and L. Song. Shaping social activity
by incentivizing users. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 2474–2482,
2014.
M. Farajtabar, Y. Wang, M. Rodriguez, S. Li, H. Zha, and L. Song. COEVOLVE: A joint point process
model for information diffusion and network co-evolution. In Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, pages 1945–1953, 2015.
P. Gai and S. Kapadia. Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society
of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2010. ISSN 1364-5021.
doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0410.
J. Gao, Y.-Y. Liu, R. M. D’Souza, and A.-L. Barabási. Target control of complex networks. Nature
communications, 5(5415), 2014.
P. Giudici and A. Spelta. Graphical network models for international financial flows. Journal of
Business & Economic Statistics, 34(1):128–138, 2016.
S. Goel, A. Anderson, J. Hofman, and D. J. Watts. The structural virality of online diffusion. Management Science, 62(1):180–196, 2015.
V. Gómez, A. Kaltenbrunner, and V. López. Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion
threads in Slashdot. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, pages
645–654. ACM, 2008.
V. Gómez, H. J. Kappen, N. Litvak, and A. Kaltenbrunner. A likelihood-based framework for the
analysis of discussion threads. World Wide Web, 16(5-6):645–675, 2013. ISSN 1386-145X. doi:
10.1007/s11280-012-0162-8.
V. Gómez, H. J. Kappen, J. Peters, and G. Neumann. Policy search for Path-Integral control. In
Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 482–497. Springer, 2014.
S. Gonzalez-Bailon, A. Kaltenbrunner, and R. E. Banchs. The structure of political discussion networks: a model for the analysis of online deliberation. Journal of Information Technology, 25(2):
230–243, 2010.
J. D. Hol, T. B. Schon, and F. Gustafsson. On resampling algorithms for particle filters. In Nonlinear
Statistical Signal Processing Workshop, pages 79–82. IEEE, 2006.
L. Hou, S. Lao, M. Small, and Y. Xiao. Enhancing complex network controllability by minimum link
direction reversal. Physics Letters A, 379(20):1321–1325, 2015.
M. O. Jackson and A. Watts. The evolution of social and economic networks. Journal of Economic
Theory, 106(2):265–295, 2002.
21
H. J. Kappen. Linear theory for control of nonlinear stochastic systems. Physical Review Letters, 95
(20):200201, 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.200201.
H. J. Kappen and H. C. Ruiz. Adaptive importance sampling for control and inference. Journal of
Statistical Physics, 162(5):1244–1266, 2016. ISSN 1572-9613. doi: 10.1007/s10955-016-1446-7.
H. J. Kappen, V. Gómez, and M. Opper. Optimal control as a graphical model inference problem.
Machine Learning, 87(2):159–182, 2012.
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network.
In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and
data mining, pages 137–146. ACM, 2003.
D. Laniado, R. Tasso, Y. Volkovich, and A. Kaltenbrunner. When the wikipedians talk: network and
tree structure of wikipedia discussion pages. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference
on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 177–184, 2011.
J. Leskovec, M. McGlohon, C. Faloutsos, N. S. Glance, and M. Hurst. Patterns of cascading behavior
in large blog graphs. In SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, volume 7, pages 551–556,
2007.
S. Levine and V. Koltun. Guided policy search. Proceedings of The 30th International Conference
on Machine Learning, 3:1–9, 2013.
Y.-Y. Liu, J.-J. Slotine, and A.-L. Barabási. Controllability of complex networks. Nature, 473(7346):
167–173, 2011.
B. Mohar and T. Pisanski. How to compute the Wiener index of a graph. Journal of Mathematical
Chemistry, 2(3):267–277, 1988. ISSN 0259-9791. doi: 10.1007/BF01167206.
R. Olfati-Saber, A. Fax, and R. M. Murray. Consensus and cooperation in networked multi-agent
systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(1):215–233, 2007.
R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review
Letters, 86(14):3200–3203, Apr 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200.
K. Rawlik, M. Toussaint, and S. Vijayakumar. On stochastic optimal control and reinforcement
learning by approximate inference. In Int. Conf. on Robotics Science and Systems (R:SS 2012),
2012.
E. Theodorou and E. Todorov. Relative entropy and free energy dualities: Connections to path integral
and KL control. In Decision and Control, 2012 IEEE 51st Annual Conference on, pages 1466–
1473. IEEE, 2012.
E. Theodorou, J. Buchli, and S. Schaal. A generalized path integral control approach to reinforcement
learning. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11(Nov):3137–3181, 2010.
N. Tishby and D. Polani. Information theory of decisions and actions. In Perception-action cycle,
pages 601–636. Springer, 2011.
22
E. Todorov. Efficient computation of optimal actions. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 106(28):11478–11483, 2009.
J. Wang, X. Yu, and L. Stone. Effective augmentation of complex networks. Scientific Reports, 6:
25627, 2016.
W.-X. Wang, X. Ni, Y.-C. Lai, and C. Grebogi. Optimizing controllability of complex networks by
minimum structural perturbations. Physical Review E, 85(2):026115, Feb 2012. doi: 10.1103/
PhysRevE.85.026115.
G. Yan, G. Tsekenis, B. Barzel, J. J. Slotine, Y. Y. Liu, and A. L. Barabasi. Spectrum of controlling
and observing complex networks. Nature Physics, 11(9):779–786, 2015.
23
| 3cs.SY
|
Submitted
Spectral Precoding for Out-of-band Power Reduction under
Condition Number Constraint in OFDM-Based System
Lebing Pan
1
No.50 Research Institute of China Electronic Technology Group Corporation, Shanghai
200311, China.
[email protected]
Abstract: Due to the flexibility in spectrum shaping, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM)
is a promising technique for dynamic spectrum access. However, the out-of-band (OOB) power radiation
of OFDM introduces significant interference to the adjacent users. This problem is serious in cognitive
radio (CR) networks, which enables the secondary system to access the instantaneous spectrum hole.
Existing methods either do not effectively reduce the OOB power leakage or introduce significant biterror-rate (BER) performance deterioration in the receiver. In this paper, a joint spectral precoding (JSP)
scheme is developed for OOB power reduction by the matrix operations of orthogonal projection and
singular value decomposition (SVD). We also propose an algorithm to design the precoding matrix under
receive performance constraint, which is converted to matrix condition number constraint in practice. This
method well achieves the desirable spectrum envelope and receive performance by selecting zero-forcing
frequencies. Simulation results show that the OOB power decreases significantly by the proposed scheme
under condition number constraint.
Keyword: Spectral precoding, Out-of-band, Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM),
Sidelobe suppression, Condition number constraint.
1. Introduction
Dynamic spectrum access [1, 2] technology is extensively studied as an effective scheme to achieve
high spectral efficiency, which is a crucial step for cognitive radio (CR) networks. Due to the flexible
operability over non-continuous bands, orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) is considered
as a candidate transmission technology for CR system [3]. However, due to the use of rectangular pulse
shaping, the power attenuation of its sidelobe is slow by the square of the distance to the main lobe in the
1
Submitted
frequency domain. Therefore, the out-of-band (OOB) power radiation or sidelobe leakage of OFDM
causes severe interference to the adjacent users. Furthermore, this problem is serious in CR networks,
which enables the secondary users to access the instantaneous spectrum hole. Therefore, these secondary
users need to ensure that the interference level of the power emission is acceptable for primary users.
In practice, typically of the order of 10% guard-band is needed for an OFDM signal in the long term
evolution (LTE) system [4]. Therefore, the spectrum efficiency is significantly reduced. The traditional
method of sidelobe suppression is based on windowing techniques [5], such as the raised cosine
windowing [6], which is applied to the time-domain signal wave. However, this scheme requires an
extended guard interval to avoid signal distortion, and the spectrum efficiency is also reduced for large
guard intervals. The cancellation carriers (CCs) [7, 8] technique inserts a few carriers at the edge of the
spectrum in order to cancel the sidelobe of the data carriers. However, this technique degraded the signalto-noise ratio (SNR) at the receiver. The subcarrier weighting method [9] is based on weighting the
individual subcarriers in a way that the sidelobe of the transmission signal are minimized according to an
optimization algorithm. However, the bit-error-rate (BER) increases in the receiver, and when the number
of subcarriers is large, it is difficult to implement in real-time scenario. The multiple choice sequence
method [10] maps the transmitted symbol into multiple equivalent transmit sequences. Therefore, the
system throughput is reduced when the size of sequences set grows. Constellation adjustment [11] and
constellation expansion [12] are difficult to implement when the order of quadrature amplitude modulation
(QAM) is high. Strikingly, the methods [10, 11] require the transmission of side information. The adaptive
symbol transition [13] scheme usually provides weak sidelobe suppression in frequency ranges closely
neighboring the secondary user occupied band. However, the schemes [7-14] depend heavily on the
transmitted data symbols.
The precoding technology is widely used in OFDM system to enhance the performance of
transmission reliability over the wireless environment, in which there are many precoding methods
2
Submitted
proposed for OOB power reduction [15]. There are two main optimization schemes with obtaining large
suppression performance. One is to force the frequency response of some frequency points to be zero by
orthogonal projection [16-19]. These frequency points are regarded as zero-forcing frequencies. The other
method [20, 21] is to minimize the power leakage in an optimization frequency region by adopting the
quadratic optimization method, using matrix singular value decomposition (SVD). The precoding scheme
in [16] is designed to satisfy the condition that the first N derivatives of the signals are continuous at the
edges of symbols. However, this method introduces an error floor in error performance. The sidelobe
suppression with orthogonal projection (SSOP) method in [19] adopts one reserved subcarrier for
recovering the distorted signal in the receiver. To maintain the BER performance, data cost is introduced
in [17] by exploiting the redundant information in the subsequent OFDM symbol. The sidelobe
suppression in [21] is based on minimizing the OOB power by selecting some frequencies in an optimized
region. The suppression problem is first treated as a matrix Frobenius norm minimization problem, and the
optimal orthogonal precoding matrix is designed based on matrix SVD. In [20], an approach is proposed
for multiuser cognitive radio system. This method ensures user independence by constructing individual
precoder to render selected spectrum nulls. Unlike the methods that focus on minimizing or forcing the
sidelobe to zero, the mask compliant precoder in [22] forces the spectrum below the mask by solving an
optimization problem. However, the algorithm leads to high complexity.
In this paper, a spectral precoding scheme is proposed with matrix orthogonal projection and SVD
for OOB reduction in OFDM-based system. The main idea of this scheme is to reduce the OOB power
under the receive quality. The condition number of the precoding matrix indicates the BER loss in the
receiver. Therefore, we develop an iteration algorithm to design the precoding matrix under matrix
condition number constraint. The proposed method has an appropriate balance among suppression
performance, spectral efficiency and receive quality. Consequently, it is flexible for practical
implementation.
3
Submitted
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the system model of OOB
power reduction by the spectral precoding method. In Section 3, we present the proposed spectral
precoding approach. Next, in Section 4, we provide an iteration algorithm to design the precoding matrix
according to the desirable spectrum envelope, spectral efficiency and BER performance. Simulations are
presented in Section 5 to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method, followed by a summary in
Section 6.
s
d
Precoding
Add
Guard
IFFT
DAC&UP
Conversion
Channel
d
s
Decoding
Remove
Guard
FFT
Down Conversion
&ADC
Fig. 1 System diagram of spectrally precoded OFDM.
2. System Model
The block diagram of a typical OFDM system using a precoding technique is illustrated in Fig. 1.
The number of total carriers used in the transmitter is M . The digital spectral precoding process before
inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) operation is expressed as
s Pd,
(1)
where d is the original OFDM symbol of size N 1 , and s is the precoded vector. The size of the
precoding matrix P is M N ( M N ) and the coding redundancy R M N is usually small. The
spectral precoding method achieves better suppression performance in zero-padding (ZP) OFDM system
than cyclic-prefix (CP) OFDM [19, 21]. What’s more, the ZP scheme has already been proposed as an
alternative to the CP in OFDM transmissions [23] and particularly for cognitive radio [24]. The proposed
method also can be directly applied to CP systems with degraded performance on sidelobe suppression.
4
Submitted
Conventionally, power spectral density (PSD) analysis for multicarrier systems is based on an
analog model with a sinc kernel function [25]. The PSD converges to the sinc function with the sampling
rate increasing. In addition, the oversampling constraint presented in [26] ensures the desirable power
spectral sidelobe envelope property after precoding for DFT-based OFDM. In a general OFDM system,
the time-domain signal can be defined by a rectangular function (baseband-equivalent) as
0t T
elsewhere
1,
g (t )
0,
(2)
where T is the symbol duration. The frequency domain representation of m-th subcarrier is written as
Gm ( ) e jT /2
sin(( m )T / 2)
,
( m ) / 2
(3)
where m is the center frequency of m-th subcarrier. Therefore, the magnitude envelope in the OOB
region ( m ) is expressed by
Gm ( )
sin(( m )T / 2)
( m ) / 2
2
.
m
(4)
Then we define the function Cm ( ) to indicate the magnitude envelope by
Cm ( )
1
.
m
(5)
The expression (5) is obtained from (4) by ignoring a constant factor. This operation does not affect
the mathematical analysis for the design of the precoding matrix [19]. The complex computing by (3) is
converted to real operation, which reduce the complexity of spectral precoding in the following. Based on
(5), using the superposition of M carriers, the target function indicating the PSD at OOB frequency is
defined by
5
Submitted
A( )
M 1
s C
m0
m
m
2
( ) ,
(6)
where sm is the m-th element in the precoded OFDM vector s . In OFDM system, the power spectrum of
its sidelobe decays slowly as ( )2 , where m is the frequency distance to the mainlobe. From
(1) and (6), the PSD target function of the OFDM signal is expressed in the matrix form as
P( )
2
1
1
A( ) cT Pd ,
Ts
Ts
(7)
where c C0 ( ), C1 ( ),...CM 1 ( ) , (.)T and denote transpose operation and expectation respectively.
T
P( ) and C ( ) are not the PSD presentation of the OFDM signal and the frequency response
respectively, but indicate their envelope character. The goal of the precoding method is to design P to
reduce the emission in OOB region. Simultaneously, the process is irrespective of the value of vector d .
3. The Proposed Joint Spectral Precoding (JSP) Method
In this paper, a joint spectral precoding (JSP) method is proposed with two times orthogonal
projection and one time SVD. The process is given by three steps: Inner orthogonal projection → SVD →
Outside orthogonal projection. As presented in the previous papers [19, 21], in each step, the main idea of
orthogonal projection is to force the power of zero-forcing frequency points to be zero, and the SVD
operation is to minimize the power in optimized region. However, the precoding matrix derived from the
final step does not achieve the goal in each step again. Unlike the methods that focus on minimizing or
forcing the sidelobe to zero, we reduce the OOB power under the receive quality constraint by selecting
the frequency points in each step. Therefore, the proposed method has an appropriate balance between the
suppression performance and the receive quality. In addition, when the number of the reserved carriers is
small, such as only one, then the number of zero-forcing frequencies in orthogonal projection method is
one. But in the JSP, we set the zero-forcing frequency in inner and outside orthogonal projection to be
different and better suppression performance is obtained.
6
Submitted
data carriers
reserved carriers
zero-forcing frequency
…
optimized region
…
…
Fig. 2 The spectrum diagram for OOB power reduction.
Generally, the subcarriers of OFDM-based system are considered to be continuous. The proposed
method also can be used for non-continuous multi-carriers system. The number of employed carriers is M
and the index is from 0 to M 1 . Fig. 2 illustrates the frequency region of m . The R reserved
carriers at the upper and lower spectral edges, which are used to achieve sidelobe suppression and
maintain the receive quality.
Two groups of zero-forcing frequency points ω a and ωb are selected in inner and outside orthogonal
projection respectively. The corresponding number is N a and N b ( N a R , Nb R ). K frequency points
in the optimized region are chosen to reduce the OOB power by SVD operation. We first give the process
of JSP in this section, and the detail of how to select the parameters is presented in the next.
In the first step, the group of zero-forcing frequency points ω a ( ωa [a1 ,...ai ,...aN ] , ai 0 or
a
a M 1 ) are chosen to achieve
i
Ca Padˆ 0,
(8)
Where d̂ is a vector of size M , derived from the original data symbol d N1 by adding zero in the location
of the reserved carriers, i.e., dˆ [0, 0,...dT ,...0, 0]T . Ca is the magnitude response matrix of size N a M ,
whose element Ca (i, j ) C j (ai ) computed by (5). j is the index of the carriers. The solution of (8) is
equivalent to map d̂ to the nullspace of Ca , In [27], the orthogonal projector Pa mapping vector onto Ca
( Ca is the nullspace of Ca ) along Ca is given by
7
Submitted
Pa I M Ca (CTa Ca )1 CTa ,
(9)
where I M is a unit matrix of size M M . This projector has a property that the precoded data vector Pa dˆ ,
in the nullspace of Ca , is closest to d̂ as
min Padˆ dˆ .
Padˆ Ca
(10)
Obviously, Pa is non-orthogonal. Therefore, it will cause significant BER performance degradation
in the receiver. After the step of the inner orthogonal projection, the precoded data is given by
s a Padˆ .
(11)
Then in the second step, the magnitude response matrix of K frequency points ω o in the optimized
region is written as Cop Co Pa , where Co is a magnitude response matrix of the K optimized frequency
points. The elements in Co is computed by (5). We then use the SVD operation to minimize the power
leakage in the optimized region. The problem is determined by
Po arg min Cop P .
(12)
P
By decomposing the matrix Cop into Cop Uc Σc VcT using SVD, the optimal precoding matrix Po to
achieve (12) is derived from
Po [VcR , VcR1 ,...VcM 1 ],
(13)
where Vci is the i-th column of Vc . The matrix Po of size M N is composed of the last N columns in
Vc . Po is an orthogonal matrix that PoT Po I N , where I N is a unit matrix of size N N . The original data
d is mapped to Pod , while the length is extended from N to M . The average power of each symbol of
M 1
N 1
i 0
i 0
before and after precoding are Ps i2 and Ps i2 , where i is the i-th diagonal element in Σ c and Ps
8
Submitted
is the average power of each symbol d . The second step is to abandon the largest R singular values in Σ c ,
then the OOB power is reduced after precoding by Pod .
In the third step, the group of zero-forcing frequency points ωb ( ωb [b1 ,...bi ,...bN ] , bi 0 or
b
b M 1 ) are chosen. The orthogonal projection matrix Pb is obtained similar to (9) by
i
Pb I M Cb (CTb Cb )1 CTb ,
(14)
where the matrix Cb of size Nb M , is the magnitude response matrix of the frequency points b . Finally,
the precoding matrix is obtained by
P Pb Po .
(15)
After precoding, the minimum error problem of decoding in the receiver, is given by
ˆ -d ,
min PPd
(16)
where P̂ is the decoding matrix. The orthogonal projector Pb map the vector onto Cb , so
rank (Pb ) M Nb N , where rank (.) denotes the rank of a matrix. Due to rank (Po ) N and the value
of N b is small, the case of that P is full column rank, is easy to be achieved in practice. Then the pseudo-
ˆ I , which is given by Pˆ (PT P)1 PT .
inverse matrix of P is the optimal solution for (16) to achieve PP
N
This JSP scheme is unlike the methods that minimize the OOB power or forcing the sidelobe to zero.
In the third step, we map Pod to the nullspace of Cb rather than the nullspace of Cb Po . If the nullspace of
Cb Po is selected, the JSP method turns to the traditional orthogonal projection method, which introduces
large deterioration in the receiver. Furthermore, after the operations in the last two steps, the precoding
matrix P does not achieve the goal in the first step of mapping d to the nullspace of Ca . In addition, after
the operation in the third step, P also does not achieve the goal of minimizing the power leakage in the
optimized region in the second step.
9
Submitted
As presented in the SVD operation [21] or orthogonal projection method [19], the receive quality
and suppression performance have not been well balanced. We also had some tests to examine other
combinations that only employing the first two steps or the last two steps in the JSP method. The results
indicate that the suppression performance is similar to only using orthogonal projection or SVD operation.
The reason is that the better OOB power reduction performance by the JSP method is obtained by two
times orthogonal projection. In addition, the BER performance is improved by using reserved carriers in
the second step. What’s more, the desirable spectrum envelope also can be achieved by selecting the
frequency points or optimized region in the three steps independently.
4. Design of The Precoding Matrix Under Condition Number Constraint
In this section, we develop an algorithm to design the precoding matrix, obtaining the desirable
spectrum envelope under receive performance constraint. As illustrated in Fig.1, the data after FFT process
in the receiver is expressed as
s Qd + n,
(17)
where Q = HP , H is a complex diagonal matrix with the channel frequency response of M subcarriers
and n is complex additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) vector with zero mean. Q = P for AWGN
channel. s is the received signal from noise measurement.
The matrix P is full column but PT P I N . Thus, this non-orthogonal precoding matrix will
introduce BER loss in the receiver. If some singular values of P are too small, compared to the other
values, low additive noise will result of large errors. Therefore, the condition number of P is
introduced, which is to measure the sensitivity of the solution of linear equations to errors in the data [28].
is given by
Con(P)=
max
,
min
(18)
10
Submitted
where max and min is the largest and the smallest singular value of P . Con(.) denotes the condition
number of a matrix. The value of indicates the BER loss in the precoding. [1, ) and larger value
of leads to worse BER performance.
Fig. 3 The condition number of transition matrix Q in AWGN channel and Rayleigh fading channel.
The transition matrix Q significantly influence the receive quality. We examine the average
condition number of Q through different channels in Fig. 3. The results of through Rayleigh channel are
averaged over 2000 realizations. Two Rayleigh channel is selected: 3GPP extended pedestrian A (EPA)
model [29], whose excess tap delay = (0 30 70 90 110 190 410)ns with the relative power = (0 -1 -2 -3 -8 17.2 -20.8)dB, and a ten-tap Rayleigh block fading channel with exponentially decaying powers set as
E (| hl (i) |2 ) el /3
9
j 0
e j /3 , j 0,1,...,9 . As illustrated in Fig. 3, the receive performance is better
through the AWGN channel than the Rayleigh fading channel. Compared to the transmission without
precoding, the condition number of Q linearly increases with condition number constraint 0 in AWGN
channel, but decrease in the Rayleigh fading channel when the value of 0 is small. The zero-forcing
equalizer is used for AWGN channel and fading channel respectively by
11
Submitted
(PT P)1 PT s,
d =
H 1 H
(Q Q) Q s,
AWGN channel
(19)
Fading channel
where (.) H and d denotes conjugate transpose and the decoded data respectively.
In this part, we develop an algorithm to obtain P under a condition number constraint by selecting
the frequency points. In order to keep the receive performance decreases slightly, the number of zeroforcing frequency points in the first orthogonal projection is chosen as small as possible. In practice, we
select N a 1 for single-side suppression or N a 2 for double-side suppression to keep the spectrum
symmetric. If the special case of R 1 is selected, then we fix N a 1 . The envelope of the precoded PSD
curve is mainly determined by the outside orthogonal projection. Thus, Nb R is selected for high
suppression performance. The two group zero-forcing frequencies ω a and ωb are arranged in the different
OOB region, far from or close to the mainlobe. The one far from the mainlobe is fixed, for the amplitude
response is weak by (5). The one closed to the mainlobe is used to maintain the receive quality by
adjusting its location. In the SVD operation, in order to effectively abandon the largest R singular values
in Σ c , K should larger or equal to R . We select ωo ωb for simple implementation and K R . Then
the variables for obtaining P are only the group closed to the mainlobe. Thus, we change these frequency
points to achieve
P maxCon(P)
P
s.t. Con(P) 0 ,
(20)
where 0 is the given condition number according to the BER constraint. The signal estimation
performance under condition number constraint in a communication system is illustrated in [28, 30]. In
addition, as presented in [16, 19], the zero-forcing frequency point close to mainlobe leads to quicker
power reduction on the edge of the mainlobe, but the power far from the mainlobe is larger. Inversely, if
these points are far from the mainlobe, the power decreases slowly on the edge, while the emission from
the mainlobe decreases largely.
12
Submitted
Table 1 The correlation between OFDM performance and the parameters in the proposed method.
BER
Case
0
R
Na
―
↓
―
↓
Case A: Quicker power reduction
on the edge of the mainlobe
Na=1: Single-side suppression
↑
↑
Case B: Lower power leakage far
Na=2: Double-side suppression
from the mainlobe
↓: Negative correlation; ↑: Positive correlation; ―: Weak or no effect.
OOB power
reduction
With summarizing the properties analyzed above, we first give the correlation between the
parameters and the performance of OFDM transceiver in Table 1, which is also presented in the simulation
section. In the following, we develop an algorithm to obtain the precoding matrix P by selecting the
frequencies ωb and ω a , according to the summary in Table 1. The main spectrum envelope is decided in
the initialization process step by step as
(a.) The value of N a and Case is selected according to the power spectrum envelope property.
(b.) R is chosen according to sidelobe suppression performance and spectral efficiency.
(c.) 0 is the given condition number according to the BER quality constraint.
If Case A is required, we fix ω a far from the mainlobe and adjust ωb . The process to solve (20) is
given in the algorithm. 1.
Algorithm. 1:
Initialization: 0 , R , N a , iteration increment , ωb ωb0 , ωa ωa0 , 0 , i 0 .
1.
i : i i +1 . i-th iteration.
2.
Design Pi by Section 3 and compute the condition number Con(Pi ) .
3.
if ( 0 )
ωb : ωb , go back to Step 1.
else
Stop.
Output: P Pi1 .
where ωb0 is the initializing frequency points close to the mainlobe, and ω a0 is the fixed frequencies far
from the mainlobe. If the number of reserved carriers of R is large, a little adjusting of ωb will lead to
13
Submitted
large change to . Therefore, the iteration increment also should be small, and the distance between
the frequency points in ωb should not be too small. In practice, we select R 4 .
If Case B is required, we fix ωb far from the mainlobe and adjust ωa : ωa in the Step 3. The
distance between the frequency points in ωb also should not be too small or too far from the mainlobe.
Otherwise, the matrix Cop may be close to singular or badly scaled. That may lead to that the results may
be inaccurate in (13) by SVD in practice.
5. Simulation Results and Discussions
In this section, some numerical results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the proposed
method. An instance in LTE is selected that the subcarrier spacing is 15 kHz. The number of the
subcarriers is N 300 in 5 MHz bandwidth [4]. The frequency axis is normalized to the spacing 2 / T .
The index of data subcarriers is from -150 to 150, while the direct current carrier 0 is not employed.
To illustrate the OOB power reduction effect, the PSD is obtained by computing the power of DFT
coefficients of time-domain OFDM signal over a time span and averaging over thousands of symbols. The
frequency-domain oversampling rate is eight and the QPSK modulation is employed. The simulated are
mainly ZP-OFDM system, unless noted otherwise.
A. Sidelobe Suppression Performance
In the first experiment, the OOB reduction performance comparison is presented using different
precoding technologies. The number of reserved subcarriers is selected as R 2 . The SSOP [19], the
orthogonal projection (OP) [16], the optimal orthogonal precoding (OOP) [21] and CC [8] methods are
selected as a comparison. The zero-forcing frequencies are fixed at ω 180 for OP and SSOP method.
The optimized region for OOP and CC scheme is also selected nearby the frequencies ω 180 . N a 2
for double-side suppression to keep the spectrum symmetric in the proposed JSP method. The spectral
14
Submitted
coding rate is 300/302, ωa 4000 and ωb 180 . The condition number of the precoding matrix is
3.2279 .
Fig. 4 PSD of the OFDM signal with different precoding techniques.
As the PSD curves illustrated in Fig. 4, all the transmitted signals are ZP-OFDM, besides CP-OFDM
signal is presented by the proposed JSP method. It is obviously that the OOB power using the JSP method
is lower than other approaches. The OOP/OP/SSOP methods have similar suppression performance. The
CC, which is not a spectral precoding method, achieves less OOB power reduction. In addition, the results
show the performance degradation of sidelobe suppression in CP systems.
Fig. 5 Quicker power reduction on the edge of the mainlobe (Case A) with different condition number constraint.
15
Submitted
Fig. 6 Lower power leakage far from the mainlobe (Case B) with different condition number constraint.
In Fig. 5, the precoding matrix is designed under a condition number constraint of
0 {1.5,3,5,10, 20} respectively. The PSD curves of Case A is presented with N a 2 . ω a is fixed far
from the mainlobe and ωa 4000 , R 2 and 0.25 . Obviously, the suppression performance is
improved by relaxing the condition number constraint while the distance between ωb and mainlobe
increasing. In Fig. 6, the Case B is presented with N a 2 . We fix ωb far from the mainlobe and
ωb 4000 , and the other parameters are same with in Fig. 5. The suppression performance is also
improved by relaxing 0 . The OOB power in the region far from the mainlobe is lower than Case A.
However, the power on the edge of mainlobe decreases slowly.
Fig. 7 Single-side suppression with different number of revered carriers, Na=1.
Fig. 8 PSD of Multi-band OFDM signal.
In Fig. 7, the Case B is selected, N a 1 and 0 1.5 . The right-side suppression is presented by
choosing ω a and ωb in the right side of the mainlobe. The distance between two adjacent frequencies in
ω a is five when R 1 . As the symmetry presented in (5), (9) and (14), the difference between adopting
the OOB frequency ω and ω to design the precoding matrix is only in the second step of SVD.
Therefore, the power on the left side OOB region is also reduced, while the power emission is higher than
16
Submitted
on the right side. The suppression performance is improved by increasing the number of revered carriers.
Although the simulation is not illustrated, this property is also presented in the case of N a 2 by adjusting
R.
In cognitive radio system, the secondary users access the spectrum hole dynamically. In addition,
carrier aggregation (CA) [31] is a critical technology in LTE system, which enable a user to employ noncontiguous subbands. Therefore, in Fig. 8, the PSD of two non-contiguous subbands occupied by one user
or two is presented. The condition number is 0 10 for all the cases. The number of the carriers of each
subband is 150. The design of the precoding matrix for two users is independent, while the data
transmitted by one user through two subbands is dependent. The results indicate that the proposed scheme
is also suitable for multi-users transmitting through non-contiguous subbands.
B. BER performance
Fig. 9 BER performance with different spectral precoding techniques through AWGN channel.
Fig. 10 BER performance with same condition number constraint through AWGN channel, Na=1.
A comparison of the BER performance using spectral precoding techniques is shown in Fig.9. The
condition number constraint is 0 2 for the JSP. The optimized region or zero-forcing frequencies for
OOP, SSOP and OP method is same with the JSP method. As illustrated in Fig. 4, the sidelobe suppression
17
Submitted
performance by OOP, SSOP and OP method is similar. The difference is that OOP scheme introduces no
quality loss in the receiver and the OP method leads to large error as presented in Fig. 9. The SSOP
method improves the receive quality by adopting a reserved subcarrier to decode the distorted signal. The
BER quality loss by the JSP method is not notable.
In Fig. 10, the condition number constraint is fixed as 0 10 , as well as single-side suppression is
selected as N a 1 . The results illustrated that the receive quality is approximate identical when the
condition number and N a are fixed, although both of the number of reserved carriers R and the Case are
different. This property indicates that if N a has been selected according to single-side suppression or
double-side suppression, the BER performance constraint can be converted to the condition number
constraint in practice.
Fig. 11 BER performance with difference condition number constraint and Na through AWGN channel, R=2.
In Fig. 11, the results demonstrate that the BER performance of N a 1 is better than N a 2 under
same constraint. This is why we select the value of N a as small as possible to maintain the receive quality.
18
Submitted
Fig. 12 BER performance with difference condition number constraint through AWGN channel.
Fig. 13 BER performance with difference condition number constraint through 3GPP EPA fading channel.
In Fig. 12, the receive quality is presented with N a 2 . The number of revered carriers is R 2 .
The results show that the BER performance decreases by relaxing 0 , but the suppression performance is
improved shown in Fig. 5-6. For example, the power in the OOB region can be reduced by nearly 40dB
when 0 10 , while the SNR loss is less than 1dB at BER=10−7. When the condition number of
precoding matrix is small, such as 0 1.5 in Fig. 12, the BER performance is slightly better than that of
without precoding. Because the number of the modulated carriers of each symbol is extended from N to
M , the receive quality is improved by frequency diversity. However, this property is not notable when the
value of 0 is large.
In Fig. 13, the parameters are set same with in Fig.12. Comparing to without precoding, the BER
performance through the fading channel is similar to AWGN channel, when SNR is small. The receive
quality decreases by relaxing 0 . But with SNR increasing, the BER line converges to without precoding.
6. Conclusions
In this paper, a joint spectral precoding (JSP) method is proposed to reduce the OOB power emission
in OFDM-based system, as well as an iteration algorithm is given to obtain the precoding matrix. We also
19
Submitted
convert the BER performance constraint to the condition number constraint of the precoding matrix. As
summarized in Table I and presented in the simulations, the proposed method has an appreciate balance
between suppression performance and spectral efficiency, under a receive quality constrain. We also can
obtain the desirable spectrum envelope by parameters configuration. Therefore, this method is flexible for
spectrum shaping in both conventional OFDM systems and non-continuous multi-carriers cognitive radio
networks.
7. References
1.
Xing, Y.P., Chandramouli, R., Mangold, S., and Shankar, N.S., 'Dynamic Spectrum Access in Open
Spectrum Wireless Networks', IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2006, 24, (3), pp.
626-637.
2. Zhao, Q. and Sadler, B.M., 'A Survey of Dynamic Spectrum Access', IEEE Signal Processing
Magazine, 2007, 24, (3), pp. 79-89.
3. Mahmoud, H.A., Yucek, T., and Arslan, H., 'Ofdm for Cognitive Radio: Merits and Challenges',
IEEE Wireless Communications, 2009, 16, (2), pp. 6-14.
4. Dahlman, E., Parkvall, S., and Skold, J., 4g: Lte/Lte-Advanced for Mobile Broadband, (Academic
Press, 2013)
5. Faulkner, M., 'The Effect of Filtering on the Performance of Ofdm Systems', IEEE Transactions on
Vehicular Technology, 2000, 49, (5), pp. 1877-1884.
6. Lin, Y.P. and Phoong, S.M., 'Window Designs for Dft-Based Multicarrier Systems', IEEE
Transactions on Signal Processing, 2005, 53, (3), pp. 1015-1024.
7. Schmidt, J.F., Costas-Sanz, S., and Lopez-Valcarce, R., 'Choose Your Subcarriers Wisely: Active
Interference Cancellation for Cognitive Ofdm', IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in
Circuits and Systems, 2013, 3, (4), pp. 615-625.
8. Brandes, S., Cosovic, I., and Schnell, M., 'Reduction of out-of-Band Radiation in Ofdm Systems by
Insertion of Cancellation Carriers', IEEE Communications Letters, 2006, 10, (6), pp. 420-422.
9. Cosovic, I., Brandes, S., and Schnell, M., 'Subcarrier Weighting: A Method for Sidelobe Suppression
in Ofdm Systems', IEEE Communications Letters, 2006, 10, (6), pp. 444-446.
10. Cosovic, I. and Mazzoni, T., 'Suppression of Sidelobes in Ofdm Systems by Multiple-Choice
Sequences', European Transactions on Telecommunications, 2006, 17, (6), pp. 623-630.
11. Li, D., Dai, X.H., and Zhang, H., 'Sidelobe Suppression in Nc-Ofdm Systems Using Constellation
Adjustment', IEEE Communications Letters, 2009, 13, (5), pp. 327-329.
12. Liu, S., Li, Y., Zhang, H., and Liu, Y., 'Constellation Expansion-Based Sidelobe Suppression for
Cognitive Radio Systems', Communications, IET, 2013, 7, (18), pp. 2133-2140.
20
Submitted
13. Mahmoud, H.A. and Arslan, H., 'Sidelobe Suppression in Ofdm-Based Spectrum Sharing Systems
Using Adaptive Symbol Transition', IEEE Communications Letters, 2008, 12, (2), pp. 133-135.
14. Xu, R., Chen, M., Zhang, J., Wu, B., and Wang, H., 'Spectrum Sidelobe Suppression for Discrete
Fourier Transformation-Based Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Using Adjacent
Subcarriers Correlative Coding', IET Communications, 2012, 6, (11), pp. 1374-1381.
15. Huang., X., Zhang., J.A., and Guo, Y.J., 'Out-of-Band Emission Reduction and a Unified Framework
for Precoded Ofdm', IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015, 53, (6), pp. 151-159.
16. van de Beek, J. and Berggren, F., 'N-Continuous Ofdm', IEEE Communications Letters, 2009, 13, (1),
pp. 1-3.
17. Zheng, Y.M., Zhong, J., Zhao, M.J., and Cai, Y.L., 'A Precoding Scheme for N-Continuous Ofdm',
IEEE Communications Letters, 2012, 16, (12), pp. 1937-1940.
18. van de Beek, J., 'Sculpting the Multicarrier Spectrum: A Novel Projection Precoder', IEEE
Communications Letters, 2009, 13, (12), pp. 881-883.
19. Zhang, J.A., Huang, X.J., Cantoni, A., and Guo, Y.J., 'Sidelobe Suppression with Orthogonal
Projection for Multicarrier Systems', IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2012, 60, (2), pp. 589599.
20. Zhou, X.W., Li, G.Y., and Sun, G.L., 'Multiuser Spectral Precoding for Ofdm-Based Cognitive Radio
Systems', IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2013, 31, (3), pp. 345-352.
21. Ma, M., Huang, X.J., Jiao, B.L., and Guo, Y.J., 'Optimal Orthogonal Precoding for Power Leakage
Suppression in Dft-Based Systems', IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2011, 59, (3), pp. 844853.
22. Tom, A., Sahin, A., and Arslan, H., 'Mask Compliant Precoder for Ofdm Spectrum Shaping', IEEE
Communications Letters, 2013, 17, (3), pp. 447-450.
23. Muquet, B., Wang, Z.D., Giannakis, G.B., de Courville, M., and Duhamel, P., 'Cyclic Prefixing or
Zero Padding for Wireless Multicarrier Transmissions?', IEEE Transactions on Communications,
2002, 50, (12), pp. 2136-2148.
24. Lu, H., Nikookar, H., and Chen, H., 'On the Potential of Zp-Ofdm for Cognitive Radio', Proc.
WPMC’09, 2009, pp. 7-10.
25. Van Waterschoot, T., Le Nir, V., Duplicy, J., and Moonen, M., 'Analytical Expressions for the Power
Spectral Density of Cp-Ofdm and Zp-Ofdm Signals', Signal Processing Letters, IEEE, 2010, 17, (4),
pp. 371-374.
26. Wu, T.W. and Chung, C.D., 'Spectrally Precoded Dft-Based Ofdm and Ofdma with Oversampling',
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2014, 63, (6), pp. 2769-2783.
27. Meyer, C.D., Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, (SIAM, 2000)
28. Tong, J., Guo, Q.H., Tong, S., Xi, j.T., and Yu, Y.G., 'Condition Number-Constrained Matrix
Approximation with Applications to Signal Estimation in Communication Systems', IEEE
Communications Letters, 2014, 21, (8), pp. 990-993.
29. 3GPP TS 36.141: 'E-Utra Base Station (Bs) Conformance Testing', 2015
21
Submitted
30. Aubry, A., De Maio, A., Pallotta, L., and Farina, A., 'Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a
Structured Covariance Matrix with a Condition Number Constraint', Signal Processing, IEEE
Transactions on, 2012, 60, (6), pp. 3004-3021.
31. Yuan, G.X., Zhang, X., Wang, W.B., and Yang, Y., 'Carrier Aggregation for Lte-Advanced Mobile
Communication Systems', IEEE Communications Magazine, 2010, 48, (2), pp. 88-93.
22
| 5cs.CE
|
arXiv:1604.00656v1 [math.AC] 3 Apr 2016
DEPTH, STANLEY DEPTH AND REGULARITY OF IDEALS
ASSOCIATED TO GRAPHS
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
Abstract. Let K be a field and S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring in n
variables over K. Let G be a graph with n vertices. Assume that I = I(G) is the
edge ideal of G and J = J(G) is its cover ideal. We prove that sdepth(J) ≥ n−νo (G)
and sdepth(S/J) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1, where νo (G) is the ordered matching number
of G. We also prove the inequalities sdepth(J k ) ≥ depth(J k ) and sdepth(S/J k ) ≥
depth(S/J k ), for every integer k ≫ 0, when G is a bipartite graph. Moreover, we
provide an elementary proof for the known inequality reg(S/I) ≤ νo (G).
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let K be a field and let S = K[x1 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring in n variables over
K. Let M be a finitely generated Zn -graded S-module. Let u ∈ M be a homogeneous
element and Z ⊆ {x1 , . . . , xn }. The K-subspace uK[Z] generated by all elements uv
with v ∈ K[Z] is called a Stanley space of dimension |Z|, if it is a free K[Z]-module.
Here, as usual, |Z| denotes the number of elements of Z. A decomposition D of M
as a finite direct sum of Stanley spaces is called a Stanley decomposition of M. The
minimum dimension of a Stanley space in D is called the Stanley depth of D and is
denoted by sdepth(D). The quantity
sdepth(M) := max sdepth(D) | D is a Stanley decomposition of M
is called the Stanley depth of M. We say that a Zn -graded S-module M satisfies
Stanley’s inequality if
depth(M) ≤ sdepth(M).
In fact, Stanley [22] conjectured that every Zn -graded S-module satisfies Stanley’s
inequality. This conjecture has been recently disproved in [1]. However, it is still interesting to find the classes of Zn -graded S-modules which satisfy Stanley’s inequality.
For a reader friendly introduction to Stanley depth, we refer to [18] and for a nice
survey on this topic, we refer to [11].
Let G be a graph with vertex set V (G) = x1 , . . . , xn and edge set E(G) (by
abusing the notation, we identify the vertices of G with the variables of S). For
a vertex xi , the neighbor set of xi is NG (xi ) = {xj | xi xj ∈ E(G)} and We set
NG [xi ] = NG (xi ) ∪ {xi } and call it the closed neighborhood of xi . For every subset
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 13C15, 05E99; Secondary: 13C13.
Key words and phrases. Cover ideal, Edge ideal, Ordered matching, Regularity, Stanley depth,
Stanley’s inequality.
1
2
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
A ⊂ V (G), the graph G \ A is the graph with vertex set V (G \ A) = V (G) \ A and
edge set E(G \ A) = {e ∈ E(G) | e ∩ A = ∅}. A bipartite graph is one whose vertex set
is partitioned into two (not necessarily nonempty) disjoint subsets in such a way that
the two end vertices for each edge lie in distinct partitions. A matching in a graph is
a set of edges such that no two different edges share a common vertex. A subset W
of V (G) is called an independent subset of G if there are no edges among the vertices
of W . A subset C of V (G) is called a vertex cover of the graph G if every edge of G
is incident to at least one vertex of C. A vertex cover C is called a minimal vertex
cover of G if no proper subset of C is a vertex cover of G.
Next, we define the notion of ordered matching for a graph. It was introduced in
[5] and plays a central role in this paper.
Definition 1.1. Let G be a graph, and let M = {{ai , bi } | 1 ≤ i ≤ r} be a nonempty
matching of G. We say that M is an ordered matching of G if the following hold:
(1) A := {a1 , . . . , ar } ⊆ V (G) is a set of independent vertices of G; and
(2) {ai , bj } ∈ E(G) implies that i ≤ j.
The ordered matching number of G, denoted by νo (G), is defined to be
νo (G) = max{|M| | M ⊆ E(G) is an ordered matching of G}.
The edge ideal I(G) of G is the ideal of S generated by the squarefree monomials
xi xj , where {xi , xj } is an edge of G. The Alexander dual of the edge ideal of G in S,
i.e., the ideal
\
J(G) = I(G)∨ =
(xi , xj ),
{xi ,xj }∈E(G)
is called the cover ideal of G in S. The reason for this name is due to the well-known
fact that the generators of J(G) correspond to minimal vertex covers of G.
The main goal of This paper is to study the Stanley depth of cover ideals and
their power. In Theorem 2.4, we prove that for every graph G, the inequalities
sdepth(J(G)) ≥ n−νo (G) and sdepth(S/J(G)) ≥ n−νo (G)−1 hold. In that theorem,
we also prove that the same inequalities hold, if one replaces sdepth by depth. Then,
in Corollary 2.5, we conclude that for every graph G we have reg(S/I) ≤ νo (G). This
inequality was previously proved by Constantinescu and Varbaro [5, Remark 4.8].
However, our proof is more elementary.
In Section 3, we consider the Stanley depth of powers of cover ideal of bipartite
graphs. Let G be a bipartite graph. In [20, Corollary 3.6], the author proved that the
k ∞
sequences {sdepth(J(G)k )}∞
k=1 and {sdepth(S/J(G) )}k=1 are non-increasing. Thus
the both sequences are convergent. In Theorem 3.3, we provide lower bounds for the
limit value of theses sequences. Indeed, we prove that for every bipartite graph G, we
have
lim sdepth(J(G)k ) ≥ n − νo (G) and
k→∞
lim sdepth(S/J(G)k ) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1.
k→∞
Then we conclude in Corollary 3.4 that J(G)k and S/J(G)k satisfy the Stanley’s
inequality, for every integer k ≫ 0. Theorem 3.3 also shows that a conjecture of the
DEPTH, SDEPTH AND REGULARITY
3
author is true for the powers of cover ideal of bipartite graphs (see Conjecture 3.5 and
the paragraph after it).
2. First Power
The first main result of this paper is Theorem 2.4, which provides a lower bound for
the depth and the Stanley depth of cover ideal of graphs. We first need the following
three simple lemmas. The first one shows that the ordered matching number of a
graph strictly decreases when we delete the closed neighborhood of a non-isolated
vertex.
Lemma 2.1. Let G be a graph and x be a non-isolated vertex of G. Then we have
νo (G \ NG [x]) ≤ νo (G) − 1.
Proof. Assume that νo (G\NG [x]) = t and let M = {{ai , bi } | 1 ≤ i ≤ t} be an ordered
matching of G \ NG [x]. Since x is not isolated, we may choose a vertex y ∈ NG (x).
Set at+1 = x and bt+1 = y. Then {a1 , . . . , at+1 } is a set of independent vertices of G,
because a1 , . . . , at are vertices of G\NG [x]. By the same reason, at+1 is not adjacent to
b1 , . . . , bt . This shows that M ∪{at+1 , bt+1 } is an ordered matching of G and therefore,
νo (G) ≥ t + 1.
The next Lemma shows that how the cover ideal of a graph G and that of G \ NG [x]
are related, when x is an arbitrary vertex of G.
Lemma 2.2. Let G ba a graph with vertex
set V (G) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. Assume that
Q
x ∈ V (G) is a vertex of G. Set u = xi ∈NG (x) xi and J ′ = J(G \ NG [x])S. Then
J(G) + (x) = uJ ′ + (x).
Proof. Let C be a vertex cover of G with x ∈
/ C. Then NG (x) ⊆ C and C \ NG (x) is a
vertex cover of G \ NG [x]. This shows that J(G) + (x) ⊆ uJ ′ + (x). For the converse
inclusion, assume that D is a vertex cover of G \ NG [x]. Then D ∪ NG (x) is a vertex
cover of G. This shows that uJ ′ + (x) ⊆ J(G) + (x) and completes the proof.
The following lemma provides a combinatorial description for the colon of cover
ideals.
Lemma 2.3. Let G ba a graph with vertex set V (G) = {x1 , . . . , xn }. Assume that
x ∈ V (G) is a vertex of G. Set J ′ = J(G \ x)S. Then (J(G) : x) = J ′ .
Proof. If C is a vertex cover of G, then C \ {x} is a vertex cover of G \ x. This shows
that (J(G) : x) ⊆ J ′ . On the other hand, if D is a vertex cover of G \ x, then D ∪ {x}
is a vertex cover of G. This shows that J ′ ⊆ (J(G) : x).
We are now ready to prove the first main result of this paper. As we mentioned in
introduction, the second part of this theorem is known by [5, Remark 4.8]. But our
argument is completely different and provides a simple proof for it.
Theorem 2.4. Let G be a graph and J(G) be its cover ideal. Then
4
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
(i) sdepth(J(G)) ≥ n − νo (G) and sdepth(S/J(G)) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1,
(ii) depth(S/J(G)) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1.
Proof. We prove (i) and (ii) simultaneously by induction on the number of edges of
G. If G has only one edge, then νo (G) = 1 and J(G) is generated by two variables.
Then depth(S/J(G)) = n − 2. Also, sdepth(S/J(G)) = n − 2 by [19, Theorem 1.1]
and sdepth(J(G)) ≥ n − 1 by [11, Corollary 24] and [13, Lemma 3.6]. Therefore, in
these cases, the inequalities in (i) and (ii) are trivial.
We now assume that G has at least two edges. Note that, G has at least one nonisolated vertex. Without loss of generality, we may assume that x1 is a non-isolated
vertex of G. Let S ′ = K[x2 , . . . , xn ] be the polynomial ring obtained from S by
deleting the variable x1 and consider the ideals J ′ = J(G) ∩ S ′ and J ′′ = (J(G) : x1 ).
Now J(G) = J ′ S ′ ⊕ x1 J ′′ S and S/J(G) = (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ) ⊕ x1 (S/J ′′ S) (as vector spaces)
and therefore by definition of the Stanley depth we have
sdepth(J(G)) ≥ min{sdepthS ′ (J ′ S ′ ), sdepthS (J ′′ )},
(1)
and
(2)
sdepth(S/J(G)) ≥ min{sdepthS ′ (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ), sdepthS (S/J ′′ )}.
On the other hand, by applying the depth lemma on the exact sequence
0 −→ S/(J(G) : x1 ) −→ S/J(G) −→ S/(J(G), x1 ) −→ 0
we conclude that
(3)
depth(S/J(G)) ≥ min{depthS ′ (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ), depthS (S/J ′′ )}.
Using Lemma 2.3, it follows that J ′′ = J(G \ x1 )S. Hence our induction hypothesis
implies that
depthS (S/J ′′ ) = depthS ′ (S ′ /J ′′ ) + 1 ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ x1 ) − 1 + 1 ≥ n − νo (G) − 1.
Also, it follows from [13, Lemma 3.6] that
sdepthS (S/J ′′ ) = sdepthS ′ (S ′ /J ′′ ) + 1 ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ x1 ) − 1 + 1 ≥ n − νo (G) − 1,
and
sdepthS (J ′′ ) = sdepthS ′ (J ′′ ) + 1 ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ x1 ) + 1 ≥ n − νo (G).
On the other hand, it follows from Lemma 2.2 that there exists a monomial u ∈ S ′
such that J ′ S ′ = uJ(G \ NG [x1 ])S ′ . Since uJ(G \ NG [x1 ])S ′ and J(G \ NG [x1 ])S ′ , (up
to a shift) are isomorphic as graded S ′ -Modules, we conclude that depthS ′ (J ′ S ′ ) =
depthS ′ (J(G \ NG [x1 ])S ′ ). On the other hand, it follows from [7, Theorem 1.1] that
sdepthS ′ (J ′ S ′ ) = sdepthS ′ (J(G\NG [x1 ])S ′ ) and sdepthS ′ (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ) = sdepthS ′ (S ′ /J(G\
NG [x1 ])S ′ ). Therefore by [13, Lemma 3.6], Lemma 2.1 and the induction hypothesis
we conclude that
sdepthS ′ (J ′ S ′ ) = sdepthS ′ (J(G \ NG [x1 ])S ′ ) ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ NG [x1 ]) ≥ n − νo (G),
DEPTH, SDEPTH AND REGULARITY
5
and similarly sdepthS ′ (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ) ≥ n−νo (G) −1 and depthS ′ (S ′ /J ′ S ′ ) ≥ n−νo (G) −1.
Now the assertions follow by inequalities (1), (2) and (3).
Let M be a finitely generated graded S-Module. The Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity (or simply, regularity) of M, denoted by reg(M), is defined as follows:
reg(M) = max{j − i| TorSi (K, M)j 6= 0}.
The regularity of a module is one of the most important homological invariants of it.
Computing the regularity of edge ideals or finding bounds for it has been studied by
a number of researchers (see for example [8], [10], [14], [15], [23]).
An immediate consequence of the second part of theorem 2.4 is the following corollary.
Corollary 2.5. For every graph G, we have reg(S/I(G)) ≤ νo (G).
Proof. It follows from Theorem 2.4 and the Auslander-Buchsbaum Formula that the
projective dimension of J(G) is at most νo (G). Then it follows from Terai’s theorem
[12, Theorem 8.1.10] that reg(S/I(G)) ≤ νo (G).
Remark 2.6. One can give a direct proof for the above corollary, by applying [16,
Corollary 18.7] on the following exact sequence.
0 −→ S/(I(G) : x1 ) −→ S/I(G) −→ S/(I(G), x1 ) −→ 0
However, this proof is essentially the same as given above.
In [10], Hà and Van Tuyl proved that the for every graph G, the regularity of
S/I(G) is less than or equal to the maximum cardinality of matchings of G. In fact,
it follows from their proof (and was explicitly stated in [24]) that the reg(S/I(G)) is
at most the minimum cardinality of maximal matchings of G. The following examples
show that this bound is not comparable with the bond given in Corollary 2.5.
Examples 2.7.
(1) Let G = C4 be the 4-cycle-graph. Then one can easily check
that νo (G) = 1 and the cardinality of every maximal matching of G is equal to
2. Thus, in this example, νo (G) is strictly less than the minimum cardinality
of maximal matchings of G. We also have reg(S/I(G)) = 1 = νo (G).
(2) Let G = P4 be the path with 4 vertices. Then one can easily check that
νo (G) = 2, while the minimum cardinality of maximal matchings of G is equal
to 1. Thus, in this example, the minimum cardinality of maximal matchings
of G is strictly less than νo (G). We also have reg(S/I(G)) = 1 is equal to the
minimum cardinality of maximal matchings of G.
3. High Powers
The aim of this section is to prove that the high powers of cover ideal of bipartite
graphs satisfy the Stanley’s inequality. To do this, in Theorem 3.3, we provide a lower
bound for the Stanley depth of cover ideal of bipartite graphs. Before that, in Lemma
3.2, we prove that the different powers of cover ideal of a bipartite graphs, can be
6
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
obtained from each other by taking colon with respect to a suitable monomial. To
prove Lemma 3.2, we need to remind the definition of symbolic powers.
Definition 3.1. Let I be a squarefree monomial ideal in S and suppose that I has
the irredundant primary decomposition
I = p1 ∩ . . . ∩ pr ,
where every pi is an ideal of S generated by a subset of the variables of S. Let k be
a positive integer. The kth symbolic power of I, denoted by I (k) , is defined to be
I (k) = pk1 ∩ . . . ∩ pkr .
The proof of the following lemma is based on the fact that the symbolic and the
ordinary powers of cover ideal of bipartite graphs coincide.
Lemma 3.2. Let G be a bipartite graph
Q and assume that V (G) = U ∪ W is a bipartition for the vertex set of G. Set u = xi ∈U xi . Then for every integer k ≥ 1, we have
(J(G)k : u) = J(G)k−1 .
Proof. It follows from [9, Corollary 2.6] that for every integer k ≥ 1 we have J(G)k =
J(G)(k) . On the other hand, for every edge e = {xi , xj } of G, we have | e ∩ U |= 1.
Thus, ((xi , xj )k : u) = (xi , xj )k−1 , for every integer k ≥ 1. Hence
\
(J(G)k : u) = (J(G)(k) : u) =
((xi , xj )k : u)
{xi ,xj }∈E(G)
=
\
(xi , xj )k−1 = J(G)(k−1) = J(G)k−1 .
{xi ,xj }∈E(G)
As we mentioned in the the first section, the sequences {sdepth(J(G)k )}∞
k=1 and
{sdepth(S/J(G)k )}∞
are
convergent.
In
the
following
theorem,
we
provide
lower
k=1
bounds for the limit of theses sequences.
Theorem 3.3. Let G be a bipartite graph. Then for every integer k ≥ 1, the inequalities
sdepth(J(G)k ) ≥ n − νo (G)
and
sdepth(S/J(G)k ) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1
hold.
Proof. Assume that V (G) = U ∪ W is a bipartition for the vertex set of G. Without
loss of generality, we may assume that U = {x1 , . . . , xt } and W = {xt+1 , . . . , xn }, for
some integer t with 1 ≤ t ≤ n. Let m be the number of edges of G. We prove the
assertions by induction on m + k. First, we can assume that G has no isolated vertex.
Because deleting the isolated vertices does not change the cover ideal and the ordered
matching number of G.
For k = 1, the assertions follow from Theorem 2.4. If m = 1, then G has two vertices
and νo (G) = 1. In this case, the first inequality follows from [11, Corollary 24] and the
DEPTH, SDEPTH AND REGULARITY
7
second inequality is trivial. Therefore, assume that k, m ≥ 2. Let S1 = K[x2 , . . . , xn ]
be the polynomial ring obtained from S by deleting the variable x1 and consider the
ideals J1 = J(G)k ∩ S1 and J1′ = (J(G)k : x1 ).
Now J(G)k = J1 ⊕ x1 J1′ and S/J(G)k = (S1 /J1 ) ⊕ x1 (S/J1′ ) (as vector spaces) and
therefore by definition of the Stanley depth we have
(†)
sdepth(J(G)k ) ≥ min{sdepthS1 (J1 ), sdepthS (J1′ )},
and
(‡)
sdepth(S/J(G)k ) ≥ min{sdepthS1 (S1 /J1 ), sdepthS (S/J1′ )}.
Notice that J1 = (J(G) ∩ S1 )k . Hence, by Lemma 2.2 we conclude that there exists
a monomial u1 ∈ S1 such that J1 = uk1 J(G \ NG [x1 ])k S1 . It follows from [7, Theorem 1.1] that sdepthS1 (J1 ) = sdepthS1 (J(G \ NG [x1 ])k S1 ) and sdepthS1 (S1 /J1 S1 ) =
sdepthS1 (S1 /J(G \ NG [x1 ])k S1 ). Therefore, by [13, Lemma 3.6], Lemma 2.1 and the
induction hypothesis, we conclude that
sdepthS1 (J1 ) = sdepthS1 (J(G \ NG [x1 ])k S1 ) ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ NG [x1 ]) ≥ n − νo (G),
and similarly sdepthS1 (S1 /J1 ) ≥ n−νo (G)−1. Thus, using the inequalities (†) and (‡),
it is enough to prove that sdepthS (J1′ ) ≥ n−νo (G) and sdepthS (S/J1′ ) ≥ n−νo (G)−1.
For every integer i with 2 ≤ i ≤ t, let Si = K[x1 , . . . , xi−1 , xi+1 , . . . , xn ] be the
polynomial ring obtained from S by deleting the variable xi and consider the ideals
′
′
∩ Si .
: xi ) and Ji = Ji−1
Ji′ = (Ji−1
Claim. For every integer i with 1 ≤ i ≤ t − 1 we have
′
sdepth(Ji′ ) ≥ min{n − νo (G), sdepth(Ji+1
)}
and
′
sdepth(S/Ji′ ) ≥ min{n − νo (G) − 1, sdepth(S/Ji+1
)}.
Proof of the Claim. For every integer i with 1 ≤ i ≤ t − 1, we have Ji′ = Ji+1 ⊕
′
′
) (as vector spaces) and therefore by
and S/Ji′ = (Si+1 /Ji+1 ) ⊕ xi+1 (S/Ji+1
xi+1 Ji+1
definition of the Stanley depth we have
(∗)
′
sdepth(Ji′ ) ≥ min{sdepthSi+1 (Ji+1 ), sdepthS (Ji+1
)},
and
(∗∗)
′
)}.
sdepth(S/Ji′ ) ≥ min{sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /Ji+1 ), sdepthS (S/Ji+1
Notice that for every integer i with 1 ≤ i ≤ t−1, we have Ji′ = (J(G)k : x1 x2 . . . xi ).
Thus Ji+1 = Ji′ ∩ Si+1 = ((J(G)k ∩ Si+1 ) :Si+1 x1 x2 . . . xi ). Hence, it follows from [17,
Proposition 2] and [6, Proposition 2.7] (see also [20, Proposition 2.5]) that
(∗ ∗ ∗)
sdepthSi+1 (Ji+1 ) ≥ sdepthSi+1 (J(G)k ∩ Si+1 ).
and
(∗ ∗ ∗∗)
sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /Ji+1 ) ≥ sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /(J(G)k ∩ Si+1 )).
8
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
By Lemma 2.2 we conclude that there exists a monomial ui+1 ∈ Si+1 such that
J(G) ∩ Si+1 = ui+1 J(G \ NG [xi+1 ])Si+1 . Therefore
J(G)k ∩ Si+1 = uki+1 J(G \ NG [xi+1 ])k Si+1
and it follows from [7, Theorem 1.1] that
sdepthSi+1 (J(G)k ∩ Si+1 ) = sdepthSi+1 (J(G \ NG [xi+1 ])k Si+1 )
and
sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /(J(G)k ∩ Si+1 )) = sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /J(G \ NG [xi+1 ])k Si+1 ).
Therefore by [13, Lemma 3.6], Lemma 2.1 and the induction hypothesis we conclude
that
sdepthSi+1 (J(G)k ∩ Si+1 ) ≥ n − 1 − νo (G \ NG [xi+1 ]) ≥ n − νo (G),
and similarly sdepthSi+1 (Si+1 /(J(G)k ∩ Si+1 )) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1. Now the claim follows
by inequalities (∗), (∗∗), (∗ ∗ ∗) and (∗ ∗ ∗∗).
Now, Jt′ = (J(G)k : x1 x2 . . . xt ) and hence, Lemma 3.2 implies that Jt′ = J(G)k−1
and thus, by induction hypothesis we conclude that sdepth(Jt′ ) ≥ n − νo (G) and
sdepth(S/Jt′ ) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1. Therefore, using the claim repeatedly implies that
sdepth(J1′ ) ≥ n − νo (G) and sdepth(S/J1′ ) ≥ n − νo (G) − 1. This completes the proof
of the theorem.
Let I ⊂ S be a monomial ideal. A classical result by Burch [3] states that
min depth(S/I k ) ≤ n − ℓ(I),
k
where ℓ(I)
analytic spread of I, that is, the dimension of R(I)/mR(I), where
L is the
n
I
=
S[It] ⊆ S[t] is the Rees ring of I and m = (x1 , . . . , xn ) is the maxR(I) = ∞
n=0
imal ideal of S. By a theorem of Brodmann [2], depth(S/I k ) is constant for large k.
We call this constant value the limit depth of I, and denote it by limk→∞ depth(S/I k ).
Brodmann improved the Burch’s inequality by showing that
(♯)
limk→∞ depth(S/I k ) ≤ n − ℓ(I).
Let I ⊂ S be an arbitrary ideal. An element f ∈ S is integral over I, if there exists
an equation
f k + c1 f k−1 + . . . + ck−1 f + ck = 0 with ci ∈ I i .
The set of elements I in S which are integral over I is the integral closure of I. The
ideal I is integrally closed, if I = I.
It is known that the equality holds, in inequality (♯), if I is a normal ideal. By
[9, Corollary 2.6] and [12, Theorem 1.4.6], we know that J(G) is a normal ideal, for
every bipartite graph G. Also, it follows from [5, Theorem 2.8] that for every bipartite
graph G, we have ℓ(J(G)) = νo (G) + 1. Thus, we conclude that
lim depth(S/J(G)k ) = n − 1 − νo (G).
k→∞
DEPTH, SDEPTH AND REGULARITY
9
(This equality is explicitly stated in [4, Theorem 4.5].) Therefore, Theorem 3.3 implies
the following result
Corollary 3.4. Let G be a bipartite graph and J(G) be its edge ideal. Then there
exists an integer n0 ≥ 1 such that J(G)k and S/J(G)k satisfy the Stanley’s inequality,
for every integer k ≥ n0 .
In [21], the author proposed the following conjecture regarding the Stanley depth
of integrally closed monomial ideals.
Conjecture 3.5. ([21, Conjecture 2.6]) Let I ⊂ S be an integrally closed monomial
ideal. Then sdepth(S/I) ≥ n − ℓ(I) and sdepth(I) ≥ n − ℓ(I) + 1.
Let G be a bipartite graph. As we mentioned above J(G) is a normal ideal. Thus,
every power of J(G) is integrally closed. Therefore, Theorem 3.3 shows that Conjecture 3.5 is true for the powers of cover ideal of bipartite graphs.
References
[1] A. M. Duval, B. Goeckner, C. J. Klivans, J. L. Martin, A non-partitionable Cohen-Macaulay
simplicial complex, preprint.
[2] M. Brodmann, The asymptotic nature of the analytic spread, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos.
Soc. 86 (1979), no. 1, 35–39.
[3] L. Burch, Codimension and analytic spread, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 72 (1972), 369–373.
[4] A. Constantinescu, M. R. Pournaki, S. A. Seyed Fakhari, N.Terai, S. Yassemi, CohenMacaulayness and limit behavior of depth for powers of cover ideals, Comm. Algebra, 43 (2015),
no. 1, 143–157.
[5] A. Constantinescu, M. Varbaro, Koszulness, Krull dimension, and other properties of graphrelated algebras, J. Algebraic Combin. 34 (2011), no. 3, 375–400.
[6] M. Cimpoeaş, Several inequalities regarding Stanley depth, Romanian Journal of Math. and
Computer Science 2, (2012), 28–40.
[7] M. Cimpoeaş, Stanley depth of monomial ideals with small number of generators, Central
European Journal of Mathematics, 7 (2009), 629–634.
[8] H. Dao, C. Huneke, J. Schweig, Bounds on the regularity and projective dimension of ideals
associated to graphs, J. Algebraic Combin. 38 (2013), 37–55.
[9] I. Gitler, E. Reyes, R. H. Villarreal, Blowup algebras of ideals of vertex covers of bipartite
graphs, Contemp. Math. 376 (2005), 273–279.
[10] H. T. Hà, A. Van Tuyl, Monomial ideals, edge ideals of hypergraphs, and their graded Betti
numbers, J. Algebraic Combin. 27 (2008), 215–245.
[11] J. Herzog, A survey on Stanley depth. In ”Monomial Ideals, Computations and Applications”,
A. Bigatti, P. Giménez, E. Sáenz-de-Cabezón (Eds.), Proceedings of MONICA 2011. Lecture
Notes in Math. 2083, Springer (2013).
[12] J. Herzog, T. Hibi, Monomial Ideals, Springer-Verlag, 2011.
[13] J. Herzog, M. Vladoiu, X. Zheng, How to compute the Stanley depth of a monomial ideal, J.
Algebra 322 (2009), no. 9, 3151–3169.
[14] M. Kummini, Regularity, depth and arithmetic rank of bipartite edge ideals, J. Algebraic Combin. 30 (2009), 429–445.
[15] E. Nevo, Regularity of edge ideals of C4 -free graphs via the topology of the lcm-lattice, J.
Combin. Theory Ser. A 118 (2011), 491–501.
[16] I. Peeva, Graded syzygies, Algebra and Applications, vol. 14, Springer-Verlag London Ltd.,
London, 2011.
10
S. A. SEYED FAKHARI
[17] D. Popescu, Bounds of Stanley depth, An. St. Univ. Ovidius. Constanta, 19(2),(2011), 187–194.
[18] M. R. Pournaki, S. A. Seyed Fakhari, M. Tousi, S. Yassemi, What is . . . Stanley depth? Notices
Amer. Math. Soc. 56 (2009), no. 9, 1106–1108.
[19] A. Rauf, Stanley decompositions, pretty clean filtrations and reductions modulo regular elements, Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roumanie (N.S.) 50(98) (2007), no. 4, 347–354.
[20] S. A. Seyed Fakhari, Stanley depth and symbolic powers of monomial ideals, Math. Scand., to
appear.
[21] S. A. Seyed Fakhari, Stanley depth of the integral closure of monomial ideals, Collect. Math.
64 (2013), 351–362.
[22] R. P. Stanley, Linear Diophantine equations and local cohomology, Invent. Math. 68 (1982),
no. 2, 175–193.
[23] A. Van Tuyl, Sequentially Cohen-Macaulay bipartite graphs: vertex decom posability and regularity, Arch. Math. (Basel) 93 (2009), 451–459.
[24] R. Woodroofe, Matchings, coverings, and Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, J. Commut. Algebra
6 (2014), 287–304.
S. A. Seyed Fakhari, School of Mathematics, Statistics and Computer Science,
College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
E-mail address: [email protected]
URL: http://math.ipm.ac.ir/∼fakhari/
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1206.5648v3 [cs.PL] 19 Sep 2013
C to O-O Translation: Beyond the Easy Stuff∗
Marco Trudel · Carlo A. Furia · Martin Nordio
Bertrand Meyer · Manuel Oriol
19 April 2013
Abstract
Can we reuse some of the huge code-base developed in C to take advantage
of modern programming language features such as type safety, object-orientation,
and contracts? This paper presents a source-to-source translation of C code into
Eiffel, a modern object-oriented programming language, and the supporting tool
C2Eif. The translation is completely automatic and handles the entire C language
(ANSI, as well as many GNU C Compiler extensions, through CIL) as used in
practice, including its usage of native system libraries and inlined assembly code.
Our experiments show that C2Eif can handle C applications and libraries of significant size (such as vim and libgsl), as well as challenging benchmarks such as
the GCC torture tests. The produced Eiffel code is functionally equivalent to the
original C code, and takes advantage of some of Eiffel’s features to produce safe
and easy-to-debug translations.
1
Introduction
Programming languages have significantly evolved since the original design of C in the
1970’s as a “system implementation language” [29] for the Unix operating system. C
was a high-level language by the standards of the time, but it is pronouncedly low-level
compared with modern programming paradigms, as it lacks advanced features—static
type safety, encapsulation, inheritance, and contracts [20], to mention just a few—that
can have a major impact on programmer’s productivity and on software quality and
maintainability.
C still fares as the most popular general-purpose programming language [38], and
countless C applications are being actively written and maintained, that take advantage of the language’s conciseness, speed, ubiquitous support, and huge code-base. An
automated solution to translate and integrate C code into a modern language would
combine the large availability of C programs in disparate domains with the integration in a modern language that facilitates writing safe, robust, and easy-to-maintain
applications.
The present paper describes the fully automatic translation of C programs into Eiffel, an object-oriented programming language, and the tool C2Eif, which implements
∗ This
work was partially supported by ETH grant “Object-oriented reengineering environment”.
1
the translation. While the most common approaches to re-use C code in other host
languages are based on “foreign function APIs” (see Section 5 for examples), sourceto-source translation solves a different problem, and has some distinctive benefits: the
translated code can take advantage of the high-level nature of the target language and
of its safer runtime.
Main features of C2Eif. Translating C to a high-level object-oriented language is
challenging because it requires adapting to a more abstract memory representation, a
tighter type system, and a sophisticated runtime that is not directly accessible. There
have been previous attempts to translate C into an object-oriented language (see the
review in Section 5). A limitation of the resulting tools is that they hardly handle the
trickier or specialized parts of the C language [7], which it is tempting to dismiss as
unimportant “corner cases”, but figure prominently in real-world programs; examples
include calls to pre-compiled C libraries (e.g., for I/O), inlined assembly, and unrestricted branch instructions including setjmp and longjmp.
One of the distinctive features of the present work is that it does not stop at the core
features but extends over the often difficult “last mile”: it covers the entire C language
as used in practice. The completeness of the translation scheme is attested by the set
of example programs to which the translation was successfully applied, as described
in Section 4, including major applications such as the vim editor (276 KLOC), major
libraries such as libgsl (238 KLOC), and the challenging “torture” tests for the GCC
C compiler.
C2Eif is available at http://se.inf.ethz.ch/research/c2eif. The
webpage includes C2Eif’s sources, pre-compiled binaries, source and binaries of all
translated programs of Table 1, and a user guide.
Sections 2–3 describe the distinctive features of the translation: it supports the
complete C language (including pointer arithmetic, unrestricted branch instructions,
and function pointers) with its native system libraries; it complies with ANSI C as
well as many GNU C Compiler extensions through the CIL framework [22]; it is fully
automatic, and it handles complete applications and libraries of significant size; the
generated Eiffel code is functionally equivalent to the original C code (as demonstrated
by running thorough test suites), and takes advantage of some advanced features, such
as strong typing and contracts, to facilitate debugging some programming mistakes.
In our experiments, C2Eif translated completely automatically over 900,000
lines of C code from real-world applications, libraries, and testsuites,
producing functionally equivalent1 Eiffel code.
Safer code. Translating C code to Eiffel with C2Eif is quite useful to reuse C programs in a modern environment, and is the main motivation behind this work. However,
it also implies other valuable side-benefits, which we demonstrate in Section 4. First,
the translated code blends reasonably well with hand-written Eiffel code because it is
not a mere transliteration from C; it is thus modifiable with Eiffel’s native tools and
environments (EiffelStudio and related analysis and verification tools). Second, the
1 As
per standard regression testsuites and general usage.
2
translation automatically introduces simple contracts, which help detect recurring mistakes such as out-of-bound array access or null-pointer dereferencing. To demonstrate
this, Section 4.4 discusses how we easily discovered a few unknown bugs in widely
used C programs (such as libgmp) just by translating them into Eiffel and running
standard tests. While the purpose of C2Eif is not to debug C programs, the source of
errors is usually more evident when executing programs translated into Eiffel—either
because a contract violation occurs, or because the Eiffel program fails sooner, before
the effects of the error propagate to unrelated portions of the code. The translated C
code also benefits from the tighter Eiffel runtime, so that certain buffer overflow errors
are harder to exploit than in native C environments.
Why Eiffel? We chose Eiffel as the target language not only out of our familiarity
with it, but also because it offers features that complement C’s, such as an emphasis on
correctness [44] through the native support of contracts.
Another reason for the choice has to do with the size of Eiffel’s community of
developers, which is quite small compared to those of other object-oriented languages
such as Java or C#. While Java users can avail of countless libraries and frameworks
offering high-quality implementations of a wide array of functionalities, Eiffel users
often have to implement such functionalities themselves from scratch. An automatic
translation tool could therefore bring immediate benefits to reuse the rich C code-base
in Eiffel; in fact, translations produced by C2Eif are already being used by the Eiffel
community.
Finally, Eiffel uncompromisingly epitomizes the object-oriented paradigm; hence
translating C into it cannot take the shortcut of merely transliterating similar constructs
(as it would have been possible, for example, with C++). The results of the paper are
thus applicable to other object-oriented languages.2
An abridged version of this paper was presented at WCRE 2012 [42]; a companion
paper presents the tool C2Eif from the user’s point of view [40].
2
Overview and Architecture
C2Eif is a compiler with graphical user interface that translates C programs to Eiffel
programs. The translation is a complete Eiffel program which replicates the functionality of the C source program. C2Eif is implemented in Eiffel.
High-level view. Figure 1 shows the overall picture of how C2Eif works. C2Eif inputs C projects (applications or libraries) processed with the C Intermediate Language
(CIL) framework. CIL [22] is a C front-end that simplifies programs written in ANSI
C or using the GNU C Compiler extensions into a restricted subset of C amenable to
program transformations; for example, there is only one form of loop in CIL. Using
CIL input to C2Eif ensures complete support of the whole set of C statements, without
having to deal with each of them explicitly (although it also introduces some limitations, discussed in Section 4.5). C2Eif then translates CIL programs to Eiffel projects
2 As proof of this, the first author has made some progress towards applying the technique described in
this paper to automatic translations from C to Java; and has recently been granted startup funding to support
this development and turn it into a commercial product.
3
Helper
Classes
C application
or library
CIL
CIL C file
C2Eif
Eiffel
application or
library
Eiffel
Compiler
Binary
Figure 1: Usage workflow of C2Eif.
consisting of collections of classes that rely on a small set of Eiffel helper classes (described below). Such projects can be compiled with any standard Eiffel compiler.
Incremental translation. C2Eif implements a translation T from CIL C to Eiffel
as a series T1 , . . . , Tn of successive incremental transformations on the Abstract Syntax
Tree. Every transformation Ti targets exactly one language aspect (for example, loops
or inlined assembly code) and produces a program in an intermediate language Li
which is a mixture of C and Eiffel constructs: the code progressively morphs from C
to Eiffel code. The current implementation uses around 45 such transformations (i.e.,
n = 45). Combining several simple transformations improves the decoupling among
different language constructs and facilitates reuse (e.g., to implement a translator of
C to Java) and debugging: the intermediate programs are easily understandable by
programmers familiar with both C and Eiffel.
Helper classes. The core of the translation from C to Eiffel must ensure that Eiffel
applications have access to objects with the same capabilities as their counterparts in
C; for example, an Eiffel class that translates a C struct has to support field access and
every other operation defined on structs. Conversely, C external pre-compiled code
may also have to access the Eiffel representations of C constructs; for example, the
Eiffel translation of a C program calling printf to print a local string variable str of type
char∗ must grant printf access to the Eiffel object that translates str, in conformance
with C’s conventions on strings. To meet these requirements, C2Eif includes a limited
number of hand-written helper Eiffel classes that bridge the Eiffel and C environments;
their names are prefixed by CE for C and Eiffel. Rather than directly replicating or
wrapping commonly used external libraries (such as stdio and stdlib), the helper
classes target C fundamental language features and in particular types and type constructors. This approach works with any external library, even non-standard ones, and
is easier to maintain because involves only a limited number of classes. We now give
a concise description of the most important helper classes; Section 3 shows detailed
examples of their usage.
• CE POINTER [G] represents C pointers of any type through the generic parameter G. It includes features to perform full-fledged pointer arithmetic and to
get pointer representations which C can access but the Eiffel’s runtime will not
modify (in particular, the garbage collector will not modify pointed addresses
nor relocate memory areas).
4
• CE CLASS defines the basic interface of Eiffel classes that correspond to unions
and structs. It includes features (members) that return instances of class
CE POINTER pointing to a memory representation of the structure that C can
access.
• CE ARRAY [G] extends CE POINTER and provides consistent array access to
both C and Eiffel (according to their respective conventions). It includes contracts that check for out-of-bound access.
• CE ROUTINE represents function pointers. It supports calls to Eiffel routines
through agents—Eiffel’s construct for function objects (closures or delegates in
other languages)—and calls to (and callbacks from) external C functions through
raw function pointers.
• CE VA LIST supports variadic functions, using the Eiffel class TUPLE (sequences
of elements of heterogeneous type) to store a variable number of arguments. It
offers an Eiffel interface that extends the standard C’s (declared in stdarg.h),
as well as output in a format accessible by external C code.
3
Translating C to Eiffel
This section presents the major details of the translation T from C to Eiffel implemented in C2Eif, and illustrates the general rules with a number of small examples.
The presentation breaks down T into several components that target different language
aspects (for example, TTD maps C type declarations to Eiffel classes); these components mirror the incremental transformations Ti of C2Eif (mentioned in Section 2) but
occasionally overlook inessential details for presentation clarity.
External functions in Eiffel. Eiffel code translated from C normally includes calls
to external C pre-compiled functions, whose actual arguments correspond to objects
in the Eiffel runtime. This feature relies on the external Eiffel language construct:
Eiffel routines can be declared as external and directly execute C code embedded as
Eiffel strings3 or call functions declared in header files. For example, the following
Eiffel routine (method) sin twice returns twice the sine of its argument by calling the
C library function sin (declared in math.h):
sin twice (arg: REAL 32): REAL 32
external C inline use <math.h> alias return 2*sin($arg); end
Calls using external can exchange arguments between the Eiffel and the C runtimes
only for a limited set of primitive type: numeric types (that have the same underlying machine representation in Eiffel and C) and instances of the Eiffel system class
POINTER that corresponds to raw untyped C pointers (not germane to Eiffel’s pointer
representation, unlike CE POINTER). In the sin twice example, argument arg of numeric type REAL 32 is passed to the C runtime as $arg. Every helper class (described
in Section 2) includes an attribute c pointer of type POINTER that offers access to a
C-conforming representation usable in external calls.
3 For
readability, we will omit quotes in external strings.
5
The mechanism of external calls is used not only in the translations produced by
C2Eif but also in the Eiffel standard libraries, wherever interaction with the operating
system is required, such as for input/output, file operations, and memory management.
Supporting calls to native code is also the only strict requirement to be able to implement, in languages other than Eiffel, this paper’s approach to automatic translation
from C. Java, for example, offers similar functionalities through the Java Native Interface (JNI).
3.1
Types and Type Constructors
C declarations T v of a variable v of type T become Eiffel declarations v :TTY (T), where
TTY is the mapping from C types to Eiffel classes described in this section.
Numeric types. C numeric types correspond to Eiffel classes INTEGER (signed
integers), NATURAL (unsigned integers), REAL (floating point numbers) with the appropriate bit-size as follows4 :
C TYPE T
char
short int
int, long int
long long int
float
double
long double
E IFFEL CLASS TTY (T )
INTEGER 8
INTEGER 16
INTEGER 32
INTEGER 64
REAL 32
REAL 64
REAL 96
Unsigned variants follow the same size conventions as signed integers but for class
NATURAL; for example TTY (unsigned short int) is NATURAL 16.
Pointers. Pointer types are translated using class CE POINTER [G] with the generic
parameter G instantiated with the pointed type:
TTY (T ∗)
= CE POINTER [TTY (T)]
with the convention that TTY (void) maps to Eiffel class ANY, ancestor to every other
class (Object in Java). The definition works recursively for multiple indirections; for
example, CE POINTER[CE POINTER[REAL 32]] stands for TTY (float ∗∗).
Function pointers. Function pointers are translated to Eiffel using class CE ROUTINE:
TTY (T0 (∗) (T1 , ...,Tn )) = CE ROUTINE
CE ROUTINE inherits from CE POINTER [ANY], and hence it behaves as a generic
pointer, but customizes its behavior using references to agents that wrap the functions
pointed to; Section 3.2 describes this mechanism.
Arrays. Array types are translated to Eiffel using class CE ARRAY[G] with the
generic parameter G instantiated with the array base type: TTY (T [n]) = CE ARRAY[TTY (T)].
4 We
implemented class REAL 96 specifically to support long double on Linux machines.
6
The size parameter n, if present, does not affect the declaration, but initializations of array variables use it (see Section 3.2). Multi-dimensional arrays are defined recursively
as arrays of arrays: TTY (T [n1 ][n2 ]...[nm ]) is then CE ARRAY[TTY (T[n2 ]...[nm ])].
Enumerations. For every type enum E defined or used, the translation introduces
an Eiffel class E defined by the translation TTD (for type definition):
TTD (enum E {v1 = k1 , . . . , vm = km }) =
class E feature v1 : INTEGER 32 =k1 ; . . . ; vm : INTEGER 32 =km end
Class E has as many attributes as the enum type has values, and each attribute is an integer that receives the corresponding value in the enumeration. Every C variable of type
E also becomes an integer variable in Eiffel (that is, TTY (enum E ) = INTEGER 32),
and the class E is only used to assign constant values according to the enum naming
scheme.
Structs and unions. For every compound type struct S defined or used, the translation introduces an Eiffel class S:
class S inherit CE CLASS feature TF (T1 v1 ) . . . TF (Tm vm ) end
for TTD (struct S {T1 v1 ; . . . ; Tm vm }). Correspondingly, TTY (S) = S; that is, variables of type S become references of class S in Eiffel. The translation TF (T v) of each
field v of the struct S introduces an attribute of the appropriate type in class S, and a
setter routine set v which also updates the underlying C representation of v:
v: TTY (T) assign set v −− declares ‘set v’ as the setter of v
set v (a v: TTY (T)) do v := a v ; update memory field (”v”) end
Class CE CLASS, from which S inherits, implements update memory field using reflection, so that the underlying C representation is created and updated dynamically
only when needed during execution (for example, to pass a struct instance to a native
C library), thus avoiding any data duplication overhead whenever possible.
Example 1. Consider a C struct car that contains an integer field plate num and a
string field brand:
typedef struct { unsigned int plate num; char∗ brand; } car;
The translation TTD introduces a class CAR as follows:
class CAR inherit CE CLASS feature
plate num: NATURAL 32 assign set plate num
brand: CE POINTER [INTEGER 8] assign set brand
set plate num (a plate num: NATURAL 32)
do plate num := a plate num; update memory field (”plate num”) end
set brand (a brand: CE POINTER [INTEGER 8])
do brand := a brand; update memory field (”brand”) end
end
7
The translation of union types follows the same lines as that of structs, with the
only difference that classes translating unions generate the underlying C representation
in any case upon initialization, even if the union is not passed to the C runtime; calls
to update memory field update all attributes of the class to reflect the correct memory
value. We found this to be a reasonable compromise between performance and complexity of memory management of union types where, unlike structs, fields share the
same memory space.
3.2
Variable Initialization and Usage
Initialization. Eiffel variable declarations v : C only allocate memory for a reference to objects of class C, and initialize it to Void (null in Java). The only exceptions
are, once again, numeric types: a declaration such as n: INTEGER 64 reserves memory for a 64-bit integer and initializes it to zero. Therefore, every C local variable
declaration T v of a variable v of type T may also produce an initialization, consisting
of calls to creation procedures of the corresponding helper classes, as specified by the
declaration mapping TDE :
(NT)
v : TTY (T )
TDE (T v;) = v : TTY (T ); create v.make( n1 , . . . , nm ) (AT)
v : TTY (T ); create v.make
(OT)
where definition (NT) applies if T is a numeric type; (AT) applies if T is an array
type S[n1 ],. . ., [nm ]; and (OT) applies otherwise. The creation procedure make of
CE ARRAY takes a sequence of integer values to allocate the right amount of memory
for each array dimension; for example int a[2][3] is initialized by create a.make( 2, 3 ).
Memory management. Helper classes are regular Eiffel classes; therefore, the
Eiffel garbage collector disposes instances when they are no longer referenced (for example, when a local variable gets out of scope). Upon collection, the dispose finalizer
routines of the helper classes ensure that the C memory representations are also appropriately deallocated; for example, the finalizer of CE ARRAY frees the array memory
area by calling free on the attribute c pointer.
To replicate the usage of malloc and free, we offer wrapper routines that emulate the syntax and functionalities of their C homonym functions, but operate on
CE POINTER: they get raw C pointers by external calls to C library functions, convert
them to CE POINTER, and record the dynamic information about allocated memory
size. The latter is used to check that successive usages conform to the declared size
(see Section 4.4). Finally, the creation procedure make cast of the helper classes can
convert a generic pointer returned by malloc to the proper pointed type, according to
the following translation scheme:
C CODE
T∗ p;
p = (T ∗)malloc(sizeof(T));
free(p);
T RANSLATED E IFFEL CODE
p: CE POINTER[TTY (T)]
create p.make cast (malloc (σ(T)))
free(p)
8
where σ is an encoding of the size information.
Variable usage. The translation of variable usage is straightforward: variable
reads in expressions are replicated verbatim, and C assignments (=) become Eiffel
assignments (:=); the latter is, for CE ARRAY, CE POINTER, and classes translating C structs and unions, syntactic sugar for calls to setter routines that achieve the
desired effect. The only exceptions occur when implicit type conversions in C must
become explicit in Eiffel, which may spoil the readability of the translated code but
is necessary with strong typing. For example, the C assignment cr = ’s’—assigning
character constant ’s’ to variable cr of type char—becomes the Eiffel assignment
cr := (’s’).code.to integer 8 that encodes ’s’ using the proper representation.
Variable address. Whenever the address &v of a C variable v of type T is taken, v
is translated as an array of unit size and type T: TDE (T v) = TDE (T v[1]), and every
usage of v is adapted accordingly: &v becomes just v, and occurrences of v in expressions become ∗v. This little hack makes it possible to have Eiffel assignments translate
C assignment uniformly; otherwise, usages of v should have different translations according to whether the information about v’s memory location is copied around (with
&) or not.
Dereferencing and pointer arithmetic. The helper class CE POINTER features
a query item which translates dereferencing (∗) of C pointers. Pointer arithmetic is
translated verbatim, because class CE POINTER overloads the arithmetic operators to
be aliases of proper underlying pointer manipulations, so that an expression such as
p + 3 in Eiffel, for references p of type CE POINTER, hides the explicit expression
c pointer + 3 ∗ element size.
Example 2. Consider an integer variable num, a pointer variable p, and a double
pointer variable carsp with target type struct car (defined in Example 1). The following C code fragment declares num, p, and carsp, allocates space for an array of num
consecutive cars pointed to by carsp, and makes p point to the array’s third element.
int num;
car ∗ p;
car ∗∗ carsp;
∗carsp = malloc(num ∗ sizeof(car));
p = ∗carsp + 2;
C2Eif translates the C fragment as follows, where the implicit C conversion from
signed to unsigned int become explicit in Eiffel (calls to routine to natural 32).
num: INTEGER 32
p: CE POINTER [CAR]
carsp: CE POINTER [CE POINTER [CAR]]
carsp.item := create {CE POINTER [CAR]}.make cast
(malloc (num.to natural 32 ∗ (create {CAR}.make).structure size.
to natural 32))
p := carsp.item + 2
9
2:libffi
1:agent
Eiffel
C
3:libffi
Figure 2: Calls through function pointers.
Using function pointers. Class CE ROUTINE, which translates C function pointers, is usable both in the Eiffel and in the C environment (see Figure 2). On the Eiffel
side, its instances wrap Eiffel routines using agents—Eiffel’s mechanism for function
objects. A private attribute routine references objects of type ROUTINE [ANY, TUPLE],
an Eiffel system class that corresponds to agents wrapping routines, with any number
of arguments and argument types stored in a tuple. Thus, Eiffel code can use the agent
mechanism to create instances of class ROUTINE. For example, if foo denotes a routine
of the current class and fp has type CE ROUTINE, create fp.make agent (agent foo)
makes fp’s attribute routine point to foo. On the C side, when function pointers are directly created from C pointers (e.g., references to external C functions), CE ROUTINE
behaves as a wrapper of raw C function pointers, and dynamically creates invocations
to the pointed functions using the library libffi [9].
The Eiffel interface to CE ROUTINE will then translate calls to wrapped functions
into either agent invocations or external calls with libffi according to how the class
has been instantiated. Assume, for example, that fp is an object of class CE ROUTINE
that wraps a procedure with one integer argument. If fp has been created with an Eiffel
agent foo as above, calling fp.call ([42]) wraps the call foo (42) (edge 1 in Figure 2); if,
instead, fp only maintains a raw C function pointer, the same instruction fp.call ([42])
creates a native C call using libffi (edge 2 in Figure 2).
The services of class CE ROUTINE behave as an adapter between the procedural and object-oriented representation of routines: the signatures of C functions must
change when they are translated to Eiffel routines, because routines in object-oriented
languages include references to a target object as implicit first argument. Calls from
external C code to Eiffel routines are therefore intercepted at runtime with libffi
callbacks (edge 3 in Figure 2) and dynamically converted to suitable agent invocations.
3.3
Conditionals, Loops, and Functions
The translation TCF takes care of constructs to structure the control flow of computations: conditionals, loops, and function definitions and calls.
Conditionals and loops. Sequential composition, conditional instructions, and
loop instructions are similar in C and Eiffel; therefore, their translation is straightforward.5
5 Eiffel
loops have the general form: from init until exit loop B end. init is executed once before the ac-
10
TCF (I1 ; I2 )
TCF (if (c) {TB} else {EB})
=
=
TCF (while (c) {LB})
=
T(I1 ) ; T(I2 )
if T(c)
then T(TB) else T(EB) end
from until not T(c)
loop T(LB) end
Note that Eiffel has only one type of loop, which translates the unique type of C
loops produced by CIL.
Functions. Function declarations and function calls in C translate to routine declarations and routine calls in Eiffel. Given a function foo with arguments a1 , . . . , an of
type T1 , . . . , Tn and return type T0 , the translation:
TCF T0 foo (T1 a1 , . . . , Tn an ){ B }
is defined as follows:
(
foo(a1: TTY (T1 ); . . . ; an: TTY (Tn )) do T(B) end
if T0 is void
foo(a1: TTY (T1 ); . . . ; an: TTY (Tn )) : TTY (T0 ) do T(B) end otherwise
Correspondingly, function calls in C become routine calls in Eiffel with the actual
arguments also recursively translated:
TCF (foo (e1 , . . . , en ))
=
foo (T(e1 ), . . . , T(en ))
Variadic functions. The C language supports variadic functions, also known as
varargs functions, which work on a variable number of arguments. The Eiffel translation of variadic function declarations uses the class TUPLE to wrap lists of arguments:
the translation of a variadic function var foo with n ≥ 0 required arguments a1 , . . . , an
of type T1 , . . . , Tn , optional additional arguments, and return type T0 :
TCF T0 var foo (T1 a1 , . . . , Tn an , . . .){ B }
is defined as:
var foo (args: TUPLE[a1 : TTY (T1 ); . . . ; an : TTY (Tn )]): TTY (T0 )
assuming T0 is not void; otherwise, the return type is omitted, as in the translation of
standard functions.
Calls to variadic functions with n required arguments may provide m ≥ 0 additional actual arguments en+1 , . . . , en+m after the n required ones e1 , . . . , en . The
translation combines all arguments, required and additional, into an (n + m)-TUPLE
denoted by square brackets:
TCF (var foo (e1 , . . . , en , en+1 , . . . , en+m )) =
var foo ([T(e1 ), . . . , T(en ), T(en+1 ), . . . , T(en+m )])
tual loop; the loop body B is executed until the Boolean condition exit becomes true; since the exit condition
is tested before each iteration, the body may not be executed. Body B and init may be empty.
11
The correctness of this translation relies on Eiffel’s type conformance rule for instances
of the TUPLE class: every (n + m)-TUPLE with types [T1 , . . . , Tn , Tn+1 , . . . , Tn+m ],
for n, m ≥ 0, conforms to any shorter n-TUPLE with types [T1 , . . . , Tn ]. Thus, translated calls are type-safe because the assignment of actual to formal arguments is covariant [12].
The bodies of variadic functions can refer to the required arguments by name using the usual syntax. The C type va list and functions va start and va arg in library
stdarg provide a means to access the optional arguments: va start(argp, last) initializes a variable argp of type va list to point to the first optional argument after last (the
name of the last declared argument). Every successive invocation of va arg(argp, T) returns the argument of type T pointed to by argp, and then moves argp right after it. The
Eiffel translation relies on the helper class CE VA LIST which replicates stdarg’s
functionality:
TDE ( va list argp )
T( va start(argp, last) )
T( va arg(argp, T) )
=
=
=
argp: CE VA LIST
create argp.make (args, index)
argp.TTY (T ) item
where args is the name of the argument TUPLE in the enclosing variadic function and
index is the index of the first optional argument.
While CE VA LIST provides a uniform interface to both Eiffel and C, the actual arguments of a variadic function may also be accessed in the Eiffel translation using the
standard syntax for TUPLEs: in a variadic function with n required arguments, the expression args.ai refers to the ith named argument ai , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n; and args.Tj item(j)
refers to the jth argument aj , for any 1 ≤ j ≤ n (required argument) or j > n (optional
argument), where Tj is aj ’s type.
Example 3. Continuing Examples 1 and 2, consider a variadic function init cars that
takes a pointer carsp to an array of cars and num pairs of unsigned integers and strings
(passed as optional arguments), and initializes the array with num cars whose plate
numbers and brands respectively correspond to the integer and string in each pair.
void init cars(car ∗∗carsp, int num, . . .) {
va list argp;
car ∗ccar;
int n;
∗carsp = malloc(num ∗ sizeof(car));
ccar = ∗carsp;
va start(argp, num);
for(n = num ; n >0; n−−) {
ccar →plate num = va arg(argp, unsigned int);
ccar →brand = va arg(argp, char∗);
ccar++;
}
}
The translation into Eiffel uses the class CE VA LIST and accesses the optional
unsigned integer arguments with argp.natural 32 item, and the optional strings with
12
argp.pointer item. The latter returns a generic pointer, which is cast to char ∗ with an
explicit cast (line 15).
13
init cars (args: TUPLE [carsp: CE POINTER [CE POINTER [CAR]]; num:
INTEGER 32])
local
argp: CE VA LIST
ccar: CE POINTER [CAR]
n: INTEGER 32
do
args.carsp.item := create {CE POINTER [CAR]}.make cast (
malloc ( num.to natural 32 ∗ (create {CAR}.make).structure size.
to natural 32 )
)
ccar := args.carsp.item
create argp.make (args, 3)
n := num
from until not n >0 loop
ccar.item.plate num := argp.natural 32 item
15
ccar.item.brand := (create {CE POINTER [INTEGER 8]}.make cast (argp.
pointer item))
ccar := ccar + 1
n := n − 1
end
end
3.4
Unstructured Control Flow
In addition to constructs for structured programming, C offers control-flow breaking
instructions such as jumps. This section discusses their translation to Eiffel.
Jumps. Eiffel enforces structured programming, and hence it lacks control-flow
breaking instructions such as goto, break, continue, and return. The translation TCF
eliminates such instructions along the lines of the global version—using Harel’s terminology [13]—of the structured programming theorem. The body of a function using
goto determines a list of instructions s0 , s1 , . . . , sn , where each si is a maximal sequential block of instructions, with no labels after the first instruction or jumps before
the last one in the block. TCF translates the body into a single loop over an auxiliary
integer variable pc that emulates a program counter:6
6 Eiffel’s
inspect/when instructions corresponds to a restricted form of switch/case without fall through.
14
from pc := 0 until pc = −1 loop
inspect pc
when 0 then T(s0 ) ; upd(pc)
when 1 then T(s1 ) ; upd(pc)
TCF (hs0 , s1 , . . . , sn i) =
..
.
when n then T(sn ) ; upd(pc)
end
end
Variable pc is initially zero; every iteration of the loop body executes spc for the
current value of pc, and then updates pc (with upd(pc)) to determine the next instruction
to be executed: blocks ending with jumps modify pc directly, other blocks increment it
by one, and exit blocks set it to −1, which makes the overall loop terminate (whenever
the original function terminates).
This translation supports all control-flow breaking instructions, and in particular
continue, break, and return, which are special cases of goto. TCF , however, improves
the readability in these special simpler cases by directly using auxiliary Boolean flag
variables with the same names as the instruction they replace. The flags are tested
as part of the translated exit conditions for the loops where the control-flow breaking
instructions appear. Using this alternative translation scheme where the generality of
gotos is not required makes for translations with little changes to the code structure,
which are usually more readable. The loop while (n > 0){ if (n == 3) break; n−−; },
for example, becomes:
from until break or not n >0 loop
if n = 3 then break := True end
if not break then n := n − 1 end
end
Long jumps. The C library setjmp provides functions setjmp and longjmp to
save an arbitrary return point and jump back to it across function call boundaries. The
wrapping mechanism used for external functions (see Section 3.5) does not work to
replicate long jumps, because the return values saved by setjmp wrapped as an external
function are no longer valid after execution leaves the wrapper. Therefore, C2Eif translates setjmp and longjmp by means of the helper class CE EXCEPTION. As the name
suggests, CE EXCEPTION uses Eiffel’s exception propagation mechanism to go back
in the call stack to the allocation frame of the function that called setjmp. There, translated goto instructions jump to the specific point saved with setjmp within the function
body.
Example 4. Consider a C function target that executes setjmp(buf) to save a location
using a global variable buf of type jmp buf. In the translated Eiffel code, buf becomes an
attribute of type CE EXCEPTION, and the call to setjmp in target becomes a creation
of an instance attached to buf: buf := create {CE EXCEPTION}.make (. . .); make’s
actual arguments (omitted for simplicity) contain references to the stack frame of the
current instance of target, and to the specific instruction where to jump.
15
Later during the execution, another function source called from target performs a
longjmp(buf, 3), which diverts execution to the location previously marked by setjmp
and returns value 3. In Eiffel, the longjmp becomes a raising of the exception object
buf enclosing the return value: buf.raise (3).
The flow of what happens next depends on the semantics of Eiffel exceptions,
which is significantly different than that of other object-oriented languages such as
Java and C#. The raised exception propagates to the recipient target, where it is handled by a rescue clause. Such exception handling blocks are routine-specific in Eiffel,
rather than being associated to arbitrary scopes such as in Java’s try /catch blocks.
The translation of setjmp also took care of setting up target’s rescue clause: if the
raised exception stores a reference to the current instance of routine target, the code
in the rescue clause modifies a variable pc local to target to point to the location of
the setjmp and, using Eiffel’s retry instruction, executes target’s body again with this
new value. Based on the value, the new execution of target’s body jumps to the correct
location following a mechanism similar to the previously discussed translation of goto
instructions. Finally, if the handled exception references a routine instance other than
the current execution of target, the rescue clause propagates the exception through the
call stack, so that it can reach the correct stack frame.
3.5
Externals and Encapsulation
The translation T uses classes to wrap header and source files, which give a simple
modular structure to C programs.
Externals. For every included system header header.h, T defines a class HEADER
with wrappers for all external functions and variables declared in header.h. The
wrappers are routines using the Eiffel external mechanism and performing the necessary conversions between the Eiffel and the C runtimes. In particular, external functions
using only numeric types, which are interoperable between C and Eiffel, directly map
to wrapper routines; for example, exit in stdlib.h becomes:
exit (status: INTEGER 32) external C inline use <stdlib.h>
alias exit($status); end
When external functions involve types using helper classes in Eiffel, a routine passes
the underlying C representation to the external calls; for example, fclose in stdio.h
generates:
fclose (stream: CE POINTER [ANY]): INTEGER 32
do Result := c fclose (stream.c pointer) end
c fclose (stream: POINTER): INTEGER 32
external C inline use <stdio.h>
alias return fclose($stream); end
In some complex cases—typically, with variadic external functions—the wrapper can
only assemble the actual call on the fly at runtime; this is done using CE ROUTINE.
For example, printf is wrapped as:
16
printf (args: TUPLE[format: CE POINTER[INTEGER 8]]): INTEGER 32
do
Result := (create {CE ROUTINE}.make shared (c printf)).integer 32 item (args)
end
c printf: POINTER
external C inline use <stdio.h> alias return &printf; end
The translation can also inline assembly code, using the same mechanisms as external function calls.
Globals. For every source file source.c, T defines a class SOURCE that includes translations of all function definitions (as routines) and global variables (as attributes) in source.c. Class SOURCE also inherits from the classes translating the
other system header files that source.c includes, to have access to their declarations.
For example, if foo.c includes stdio.h, FOO is declared as class FOO inherit STDIO.
3.6
Formatted Output Optimization
The library function printf is the standard C output function, which displays values
according to format strings passed as argument. In contrast, Eiffel provides the command Io.put string to put plain text strings on standard output, as well as type-specific
formatter classes, such as FORMAT INTEGER, to produce string representations of
arbitrary types.
With the goal of making the translated code as close as possible to standard Eiffel,
C2Eif tries to replace calls to printf with equivalent calls to Io.put string and routines of
the formatter classes. Whenever printf’s returned value is not used and the format string
is a constant literal, C2Eif parses the literal format string and encodes it as equivalent
calls to Io.put string and formatters. This process may find mismatches between some
format specifiers and the types of the corresponding value arguments, which C2Eif
reports as warnings. Another situation where C2Eif can replace calls to printf with
calls to put string is when only one argument is passed to the former, which is then
interpreted verbatim as a string. Whenever a warning is issued or the usage of printf
cannot be rendered using put string, C2Eif falls back to calling a wrapper of the native
printf function (described in Section 3.5). The translation also implements similar
optimizations for variants of printf such as fprintf.
4
Evaluation and Discussion
This section evaluates the translation T and its implementation in C2Eif. The bulk of
the evaluation assesses correctness (Section 4.1) and performance (Section 4.2) based
on experiments with 14 open-source programs. We also qualitatively discuss other
aspects that influence maintainability (Section 4.3), the advantages in terms of safety
deriving from switching to the Eiffel runtime (Section 4.4), as well as the current limitations of the C2Eif approach (Section 4.5).
17
4.1
Correct Behavior
To experimentally assess the translations produced by C2Eif, we applied it to 14 opensource C programs, including 7 applications, 6 libraries, and one testsuite; most of
them are widely-used in Linux and other “*nix” distributions. hello world is
the only toy application, which is however useful to have a baseline of translating
from C to Eiffel with C2Eif. The other applications are: micro httpd 12dec2005,
a minimal HTTP server; xeyes 1.0.1, a widget for the X Windows System which
shows two googly eyes following the cursor movements; less 382-1, a text terminal pager; wget 1.12, a command-line utility to retrieve content from the web;
links 1.00, a simple web browser; vim 7.3, a powerful text editor. The libraries are:
libSDL mixer 1.2, an audio playback library; libmongoDB 0.6, a library to access
MongoDB databases; libpcre 8.31, a library for regular expressions; libcurl
7.21.2, a URL-based transfer library supporting protocols such as FTP and HTTP;
libgmp 5.0.1, for arbitrary-precision arithmetic; libgsl 1.14, a powerful numerical
library. The gcc “torture tests” are short but semantically complex pieces of C code,
used as regression tests for the GCC compiler.
Table 1 shows the results of translating the 14 programs into Eiffel using C2Eif,
running on a GNU/Linux box (kernel 2.6.37) with a 2.66 GHz Intel dual-core CPU
and 8 GB of RAM, GCC 4.5.1, CIL 1.3.7, EiffelStudio 7.1.8. For each application,
library, and testsuite Table 1 reports: (1) the size (in lines of code) of the CIL version
of the C code and of the translated Eiffel code; (2) the number of Eiffel classes created;
(3) the time (in seconds) spent by C2Eif to perform the source-to-source translation
(not including compilation from Eiffel source to binary); (4) the size of the binaries (in
MBytes) generated by EiffelStudio.7
We ran extensive trials on the translated programs to verify that they behave as in
their original C version, thus validating the correctness of the translation T and its implementation in C2Eif. The trials comprised informal usage, systematic performance
tests for some of the applications, and running the standard testsuites available for the
three biggest libraries (libcurl, libgmp, and libgsl). The rest of this section
describes the translated testsuites and their behavior with respect to correctness; Section 4.2 discusses the quantitative performance results.
Library libcurl comes with a client application and a testsuite of 583 tests defined in XML and executed by a Perl script calling the client; libgmp and libgsl
respectively include testsuites of 145 and 46 tests, consisting of client C code using the
libraries. All tests execute and pass on both the C and the translated Eiffel versions of
the libraries, with the same logged output. For libcurl, C2Eif translated the library
and the client application. For libgmp and libgsl, it translated the test cases as
well as the libraries.
The gcc torture testsuite includes 1116 tests; the GCC version we used fails 4 of
them; CIL (which depends on GCC) fails another 110 tests among the 1112 that GCC
passes; finally, C2Eif (which depends on CIL) passes 989 (nearly 99%) and fails 13 of
the 1002 tests passed by CIL. Given the challenging nature of the torture testsuite, this
result is strong evidence that C2Eif handles the complete C language used in practice,
and produces correct translations.
7 We
do not give a binary size for libraries, because EiffelStudio cannot compile them without a client.
18
Table 1: Translation of 14 open-source programs.
S IZE (LOCS)
CIL
E IFFEL
hello world
micro httpd
xeyes
less
wget
links
vim
libSDL mixer
libmongoDB
libpcre
libcurl
libgmp
libgsl
gcc (torture)
T OTAL
8
565
1,463
16,955
46,528
70,980
276,635
7,812
7,966
18,220
37,836
61,442
238,080
147,545
932,035
15
1,934
10,661
22,545
57,702
100,815
395,094
11,553
10,341
24,885
65,070
79,971
344,115
256,246
1,380,947
#E IFFEL
CLASSES
T IME
(S)
B INARY SIZE
(MB)
1
16
78
75
183
211
663
47
43
38
289
370
978
2,569
5,561
1
1
1
5
25
33
144
3
3
14
18
21
85
79
433
1.3
1.5
1.8
2.6
4.5
13.9
24.2
–
–
–
–
–
–
1,576
1,626
The 13 torture tests failing after translation to Eiffel target the following unsupported features. One test reads an int from a va list (variadic function list of arguments) which actually stores a struct whose first field is a double; the Eiffel typesystem does not allow this, and inspection suggests that it is probably a copy-paste
error rather than a feature. Two tests exercise GCC-specific optimizations, which are
immaterial after translation to Eiffel. Six tests target exotic GCC built-in functions,
such as builtin frame address; one test performs explicit function alignment; and three
rely on special bitfield operations.
4.2
Performance
We analyzed the performance of 5 applications, the GCC torture testsuite, and the standard testsuites of 3 libraries (described in Section 4.1) translated to Eiffel using C2Eif.
Table 2 shows the result of the performance trials, running on the same system used
for the experiments of Section 4.1.8 For each program or testsuite, Table 2 reports
the execution time (in seconds), the maximum percentage of CPU, and the maximum
amount of RAM (in MBytes) used while running. The table compares the performance
of the original C versions (columns “C”) against the Eiffel translations with C2Eif
(columns “T”), and, for the simpler examples, against manually written Eiffel implementations (columns “E”) that transliterate the original C implementations using the
closest Eiffel constructs (for example, putchar becomes Io.put character) with as little changes as possible to the code structure (we manually wrote these transliterations
8 We
compiled all CIL-processed C programs with the GCC options -O2 -s; and all Eiffel programs
with disabled void checking, inlining size 100, and stripped binaries.
19
Table 2: Performance comparison for 5 applications and 4 testsuites.
hello world
micro httpd
less
wget
vim
libcurl
libgmp
libgsl
gcc (torture)
E XECUTION TIME ( S )
C
T
E
M AX % CPU
C
T
E
M AX MB RAM
C
T
E
0
5
36
16
85
199
44
25
0
0
99
–
22
–
–
–
–
–
1.3
2.3
–
4.4
–
–
–
–
–
0
37
36
16
85
212
728
1501
5
0
46
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
30
99
–
22
–
–
–
–
–
30
99
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
5.5
7.8
–
69
–
–
–
–
–
5.3
5.6
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
ourselves). Maximum CPU and RAM usages are immaterial for the testsuites (torture
and libraries), because their execution consists of a large number of separate calls. The
rest of this section discusses the performance results together with other qualitative
performance assessments.
The performance of hello world demonstrates the base overhead, in terms of
CPU and memory usage, of the default Eiffel runtime (objects, automatic memory
management, and contract checking—which can however be disabled for applications
where sheer performance is more important than having additional checks).
The test with micro httpd consisted in serving the local download of a 174 MB
file (the Eclipse IDE); this test boils down to a very long sequence (approximately 200
million iterations) of inputting a character from file and outputting it to standard output.
The translated Eiffel version incurs a significant overhead with respect to the original
C version, but is faster than the manually written Eiffel transliteration. This might
be due to feature lookups in Eiffel or to the less optimized implementation of Eiffel’s
character services. As a side note, we did the same exercise of manually transliterating
micro httpd using Java’s standard libraries; this Java translation ran the download
example in 170 seconds, using up to 99% of CPU and 150 MB of RAM.
The test with wget downloaded the same 174 MB Eclipse package over the SWITCH
Swiss network backbone. The bottleneck is the network bandwidth, and hence differences in performance are negligible, except for memory consumption, which is higher
in Eiffel due to garbage collection (memory is deallocated only when necessary, thus
the maximum memory usage is higher in operational conditions).
The test with libcurl consisted in running all 583 tests from the standard testsuite mentioned before. The total runtime is comparable in translated Eiffel and C.
The tests with libgmp and libgsl ran their respective standard testsuites. The
overall slow-down seems significant, but a closer look shows that the large majority of
tests run in comparable time in C and Eiffel: 30% of the libgmp tests take up over
95% of the running time; and 26% of the libgsl tests take up almost 99% of the time.
The GCC torture tests incur only a moderate slow-down, concentrated in 3 tests that
take 97% of the time. In all these experiments, the tests responsible for the conspicuous
20
slow-down target operations that execute slightly slowlier in the translated Eiffel than
in the native C (e.g., accessing a struct field) and repeat it a huge number of times, so
that the basic slow-down increases many-fold. These bottlenecks are an issue only in a
small fraction of the tests and could be removed manually in the translation.
The interactive applications (xeyes, less, links, and vim) run smoothly with
good responsiveness, comparable to their original implementations. The test for less
and vim consisted in scrolling through large text files one line at a time (by holding
“arrow down” in less) or one page at a time (by holding “page down” in vim).
Table 2 shows the running times, which are the same in C and Eiffel; the screen refresh
rate is also indistinguishable.
In all, the performance overhead in switching from C to Eiffel significantly varies
with the program type but, even when it is significant, does not preclude the usability of
the translated application or library in normal conditions—as opposed to the behavior
in a few specific test cases.
4.3
Usability and Maintainability
A tool such as C2Eif, which provides automatic translation between languages, is applicable in different contexts within general software maintenance and evolution processes. This section discusses some of these applications and how suitable C2Eif can
be for each of them.
Reuse in clients. The first, most natural application is using C2Eif to automatically
reuse large C code-bases in Eiffel. This is not merely a possibility, but something
extremely valuable for Eiffel, whose user community is quite small compared to those
of other mainstream languages such as C, Java, or C++. Since we released C2Eif to the
public as open-source, we have been receiving several requests from the community
to produce Eiffel versions of C libraries whose functionalities are sorely missed in
Eiffel, and whose native implementation would require a substantial effort to get to
software of quality comparable to the widely tested and used C implementations. This
was the case, in particular, of libSDL mixer, libmongoDB, and libpcre, whose
automatic translations created using C2Eif were requested from the community and are
now being used in Eiffel applications. We are also aware of some Eiffel programmers
directly trying to use C2Eif to translate useful C libraries and deploy them in their own
software.
This form of reuse mainly entails writing Eiffel client code that accesses translated C components. Supporting it requires tools that handle the full C language as
used in practice, and that produce translated APIs understandable and usable with a
programming style sufficiently close to what is the norm in Eiffel, without requiring
in-depth understanding of the C conventions. To give an idea of how C2Eif fares
in this respect, consider writing a simple class PRINT SOURCE SEHOME, which
uses the API of cURL to retrieve and print the HTML code of the home page at
http://se.inf.ethz.ch. Table 3 shows two versions of this client class. The
one on the left uses the translation of libcurl automatically generated by C2Eif;
the one on the right uses the wrapper of libcurl part of the Eiffel standard libraries
included with the EiffelStudio IDE, written by EiffelSoftware programmers. The two
21
solutions are quite similar in structure and style. The version based on C2Eif still requires adhering to a couple of conventions that are a legacy of the translation from C:
the arguments passed to routine curl easy setopt must be listed in a tuple, and the routine call itself includes a do nothing which is needed whenever a function that returns
a value is used as an instruction (Eiffel enforces separation between functions and procedures). On the other hand, the “native” solution has a slightly more complex control
structure, because it has to check that the dynamically linked cURL library is actually
accessible at runtime; this is unnecessary with the implementation based on C2Eif,
which does not depend on dynamically linked libraries since libcurl is available
translated to Eiffel.
When a C library undergoes maintenance, the introduced changes have the same
impact on the C and on the Eiffel clients of the library. In particular, if the changes
to the library do not break client compatibility (that is, the API does not change), one
should simply run C2Eif again on the new library version and replace it in the Eiffel projects that depends on it. If the API changes, clients may have to change too,
independent of the language they are written in.
Evolution of translated libraries. Once a program is translated from C to Eiffel,
one may decide it has become part of the Eiffel ecosystem, and hence it will undergo
maintenance and evolution as any other piece of Eiffel code. In this scenario, C2Eif
class
PRINT SOURCE SEHOME
class
PRINT SOURCE SEHOME
inherit
LIBCURL CONSTANTS
inherit
CURL OPT CONSTANTS
create
make
create
make
feature
feature
make
local
easy: P EASY STATIC
handle: CE POINTER [ANY]
ret: NATURAL 32
do
create easy
handle := easy.curl easy init
easy.curl easy setopt ([handle, Curlopt url,
ce string (”se.inf.ethz.ch”)]).do nothing
ret := easy.curl easy perform (handle)
easy.curl easy cleanup (handle)
end
end
make
local
easy: CURL EASY EXTERNALS
handle: POINTER
ret: INTEGER 32
do
create easy
if easy.is dynamic library exists then
handle := easy.init
easy.setopt string (handle, Curlopt url,
”se.inf.ethz.ch”)
ret := easy.perform (handle)
easy.cleanup (handle)
else
Io.error.put string (”cURL not found.%N”)
end
end
end
Table 3: Two Eiffel clients of cURL: using libcurl translated with C2Eif (left) and
using the library wrapper provided by EiffelStudio (right).
22
provides an immediately applicable solution to port C code to Eiffel, whereas the ensuing maintenance effort is distributed over an entire lifecycle and devoted to improve the
automatic translation (for example, removing the application-dependent performance
bottlenecks highlighted in Section 4.2) and completely conforming it to the Eiffel style.
Such maintenance of translations is the easier the closer the generated code follows
Eiffel conventions and, more generally, the object-oriented paradigm. Providing a convincing empirical evaluation of the readability and maintainability of the code generated by C2Eif (not just from the perspective of writing client applications) is beyond
the scope of the present work. Notice, however, that C2Eif already follows numerous
Eiffel conventions such as for the names of classes, types, and local variables, which
might look verbose to hard-core C programmers but are de rigueur in Eiffel. Follow-up
work, which we briefly discuss in Section 6, has targeted the object-oriented reengineering of C2Eif translations. In all, while the translations produced by C2Eif still
retain some “C flavor”, we believe they are overall understandable and modifiable in
Eiffel with reasonable effort.
Two-way propagation of changes. One more maintenance scenario occurs if one
wants to be able to independently modify a C program and its translation to Eiffel,
while still being able to propagate the changes produced in each to the counterpart. For
example, this scenario applies if a C library is being extended with new functionality,
while its Eiffel translation produced by C2Eif undergoes refactoring to optimize it to
the Eiffel environment. This scenario is the most challenging of those discussed in this
section; it poses problems similar to those of merging different development branches
of the same project. While merge conflicts are still a bane of collaborative development,
modern version control systems (such as Git or Mercurial) have evolved to provide
powerful support to ease the process of conflict reconciliation. Thus, they could be
very useful also in combination with automatic translators such as C2Eif to be able to
integrate changes in C with other changes in Eiffel.
4.4
Safety and Debuggability
Besides the obvious advantage of reusing the huge C code-base, translating C code to
Eiffel using C2Eif leverages some high-level feature which may improve safety and
make debugging easier in some conditions.
Uncontrolled format string is a well-known vulnerability [4] of C’s printf library
function, which permits malicious clients to access data in the stack by supplying special format strings. Consider for example the C program:
int main (int argc, char ∗ argv[])
{ char ∗secret = ”This is secret!”; if (argc >1) printf(argv[1]); return 0;
}
If we call it with: ./example "{Stack: %x%x%x%x%x%x} --> %s", we get
the output {stack: 0b7[. . .]469} --> This is secret!, which reveals the
local string secret. The safe way to achieve the intended behavior would be the instruction printf (”%s”, argv[1]) instead of printf (argv[1]), so that the input string is
interpreted literally.
23
What is the behavior of code vulnerable to uncontrolled format strings, when translated to Eiffel with C2Eif? In simple usages of printf with just one argument as in
the example, the translation replaces calls to printf with calls to Eiffel’s Io.put string,
which prints strings verbatim without interpreting them; therefore, the translated code
is not vulnerable in these cases. The replacement was possible in 65% of all the
printf calls in the programs of Table 1. C2Eif translates more complex usages of
printf (for example, with more than one argument and no literal format string such as
printf (argv[1], argv[2])) into wrapped calls to the external printf function, and hence
the vulnerability still exists. However, it is less extensive or more difficult to exploit
in Eiffel: primitive types (such as numeric types) are stored on the stack in Eiffel as
they are in C, but Eiffel’s bulkier runtime typically stores them farther up the stack, and
hence longer and more complex format strings must be supplied to reach the stack data
(for instance, a variation of the example with secret requires 386 %x’s in the format
string to reach local variables). On the other hand, non-primitive types (such as strings
and structs) are wrapped by Eiffel classes in C2Eif, which are stored in the heap, and
hence unreachable directly by reaching stack data. In these cases, the vulnerability
vanishes in the Eiffel translation.
Debugging format strings. C2Eif also parses literal format strings passed to printf
and detects type mismatches between format specifiers and actual arguments. This
analysis, necessary when moving from C to a language with a stronger type system,
helps debug incorrect and potentially unsafe usages of format strings. Indeed, a mismatch detected while running the 145 libgmp tests revealed a real error in the library’s
implementation of macro TESTS REPS:
char ∗envval, ∗end; /∗ ... ∗/
long repfactor = strtol(envval, &end, 0);
if(∗end || repfactor ≤ 0) fprintf (stderr, ”Invalid repfactor: %s.\n”, repfactor);
String envval should have been passed to fprintf instead of long repfactor. GCC with
standard compilation options does not detect this error, which may produce garbage
or even crash the program at runtime. Interestingly, version 5.0.2 of libgmp patches
the code in the wrong way, changing the format specifier %s into %ld. This is still
incorrect because when envval does not encode a valid “repfactor”, the outcome of
the conversion into long is unpredictable. Finally, notice that C2Eif may also report
false positives, such as long v = ”Hello!”; printf(”%s”, v) which is acceptable (though
probably not commendable) usage.
Out-of-bound error detection. C arrays translate to instances of class CE ARRAY
(see Section 3.1), which includes contracts that signal out-of-bound accesses to the
array content. Therefore, out-of-bound errors are much easier to detect in Eiffel applications using components translated with C2Eif. Simply by translating and running
the libgmp testsuite, we found an off-by-one error causing out-of-bound access (our
patch has been included in more recent versions of the library); the error does not manifest itself when running the original C version. More generally, contracts help detect
the precise location of array access errors. Consider, for example:
24
int ∗ buf = (int ∗) malloc(sizeof (long long int) ∗ 10);
buf = buf − 10;
buf = buf + 29;
∗buf = ’a’; buf++;
∗buf = ’b’;
1
2
3
4
5
buf is an array that stores 20 elements of type int (which has half the size of long long int).
The error is on line 5, when buf points to position 20, out of the array bounds; line 2
is instead OK: buf points to an invalid location, but it is not written to. This program
executes without errors in C; the Eiffel translation, instead, stops exactly at line 5 and
signals an out-of-bound access to buf.
Array bound checking may be disabled, which is necessary in borderline situations where out-of-bound accesses do not crash because they assume a precise memory layout. For example, links and vim use statements of the following form
block ∗p = (block ∗)malloc(sizeof(struct block)+ len), with len >0, to allocate struct
datatypes of the form struct block { /∗... ∗/char b[1]; }. In this case, p points to a
struct with room for 1 + len characters in p→b; the instruction p→b[len]=‘i’ is then
executed correctly in C, but the Eiffel translation assumes p→b has the statically declared size 1, hence it stops with an error. Another borderline situation is with multidimensional arrays, such as double a[2][3]. An iteration over a’s six elements with
double ∗p = &a[0][0] translated to Eiffel fails to go past the third element, because it
sees a[0][0] as the first element of an array of length 3 (followed by another array of
the same length). A simple cast double ∗ p = (double∗)a achieves the desired result
without fooling the compiler, hence it works without errors also in translated code.
These situations are examples of unsafe programming more often than not.
More safety in Eiffel. Our experiments found another bug in libgmp, where
function gmp sprintf final had three formal input arguments, but was only called with
one actual through a function pointer. Inspection suggests it is a copy-paste error of the
other function gmp sprintf reps. The Eiffel version found the mismatch when calling
the routine and reported a contract violation. Easily finding such bugs demonstrates the
positive side-effects of translating widely-used C programs into a tighter, higher-level
language.
4.5
Limitations
The only significant limitations of the translation T implemented in C2Eif in supporting C programs originate in the introduction of strong typing: programming practices
that implicitly rely on a certain memory layout may not work in C applications translated to Eiffel. Section 4.4 mentioned some examples in the context of array manipulation (where, however, the checks on the Eiffel side can be disabled). Another example
is a function int trick (int a, int b) that returns its second argument through a pointer
to the stack, with the instructions int ∗p = &a; return ∗(p+1). C2Eif’s translation assumes p points to a single integer cell and cannot guarantee that b is stored in the next
cell.
Another limitation is the fact that C2Eif takes input from CIL, and hence it does not
support legacy C such as K&R C. The support can, however, be implemented by di25
rectly extending the pre-processing CIL front-end. Similarly, the GCC torture testsuite
highlighted a few exotic GCC features currently unsupported by C2Eif (Section 4.1),
which may be handled in future work.
Code using unrestricted gotos poses the biggest hurdles to producing readable Eiffel code. This is arguably unavoidable when translating to any programming language
that does not have jumps. The translation T does, however, avoid the most complicated general translation scheme with the simpler control-flow breaking instructions
continue, break, and return instructions, whose translation is normally much more
readable than when using unrestricted gotos (see the example in Section 4).
5
Related Work
There are two main approaches to reuse source code written in a “foreign” language
(e.g., C) in a different “host” language (e.g., Eiffel): define wrappers for the components written in the foreign language; and translate the foreign source code into
functionally equivalent host code. We discuss related work pursuing these approaches
in Sections 5.1 and 5.2. In Section 5.3, we review the major solutions to automate
object-oriented reengineering, which is a natural follow-up of automatic translation
into object-oriented languages.
5.1
Wrapping Foreign Code
Wrappers enable the reuse of foreign implementations through the API of bridge libraries. This approach (e.g., [6, 5, 30]) does not modify the foreign code, whose functionality is therefore not altered; moreover, the complete foreign language is supported.
On the other hand, the type of data that can be retrieved through the bridging API is
often restricted to a simple subset common to the host and foreign language (e.g., primitive types). C2Eif uses wrappers only to translate external functions and assembly
code.
5.2
Translating Foreign Code
Industrial practices have long encompassed manual migrations of legacy code. Some
semi-automated tools exist that help translate code written in legacy programming languages such as old versions of COBOL [37, 21], Fortran-77 [1, 34], and K&R C [46].
Terekhov et al. [37] review how automated language conversion is applied in industry; based on their experience, they conclude that “creating 100% automated conversion tools is neither possible, nor desirable”. Our experience with C2Eif, however,
suggests that such a conclusion has only relative validity: in the rich design space
of automatic translators, there are scenarios where trading off some performance for
complete automation is possible and desirable. Rather than imposing an upfront heavyweight burden on developers in charge of migration, we suggest to start with an automatically translated version which is suboptimal but works out of the box, and then
devote the manual programming effort to improving and adapting what is necessary—
26
incrementally with an agile approach which also depends on the specific application
domain and requirements.
Some translators focus on the adaptation of code into an extension (superset) of the
original language. Examples include the migration of legacy code to object-oriented
code, such as Cobol to OO-Cobol [25, 32, 45], Ada to Ada95 [35], and C to C++ [15,
47]. Some of such efforts try to go beyond the mere hosting of the original code, and
introduce refactorings that take advantage of the object-oriented paradigm. Most of
these refactorings are, however, limited to restructuring modules into classes (see the
focused discussion in Section 5.3). C2Eif follows a similar approach, but also takes
advantage of some advanced features (such as contracts) to improve the reliability of
translated code.
Ephedra [18] is a tool that translates legacy C to Java. It first translates K&R C
to ANSI C; then, it maps data types and type casts; finally, it translate the C source
code to Java. Ephedra handles a significant subset of C, but cannot translate frequently
used features such as unrestricted gotos, external pre-compiled libraries, and inlined
assembly code. A case study evaluating Ephedra [19] involved three small programs:
the implementation of fprintf, a monopoly game (about 3 KLOC), and two graph layout
algorithms. The study reports that the source programs had to be manually adapted to
be processable by Ephedra. In contrast, C2Eif is completely automatic, and works with
significantly larger programs.
Other tools (proprietary or open-source) to translate C (and C++) to Java or C#
include: C2J++ [39], C2J [27], and C++2C# and C++2Java [36]. Table 4 shows a
feature comparison among the currently available tools that translate C to an objectoriented language, showing:
• The target language.
• Whether the tool is completely automatic, that is whether it generates translations
that are ready for compilation.
• Whether the tool is available for download and usable. In a couple of cases we
could only find papers describing the tool but not a version of the implementation
working on standard machines.
• An (subjective to a certain extent) assessment of the readability of the code produced. In each case, we tried to evaluate if the translated code is sufficiently
similar to the C source to be readily understandable by a programmer familiar
with the latter. We judged C2J’s readability negatively because the tool puts data
into a single global array to support pointer arithmetic. This is quite detrimental
to readability and also circumvents type checking in the Java translation.
• Whether the tool supports unrestricted calls to external libraries, unrestricted
pointer arithmetic, unrestricted gotos, and inlined assembly code.
The table demonstrates that C2Eif is arguably the first completely automatic tool that
handles the complete C language as used in practice.
In previous work, we developed J2Eif, an automatic source-to-source translator
from Java to Eiffel [43]; translating between two object-oriented languages does not
27
completely
automatic
available
readability
external
libraries
pointer
arithmetic
gotos
inlined
assembly
Ephedra
Convert2Java
C2J++
C2J
C++2Java
C++2C#
C2Eif
target
language
Table 4: Tools translating C to O-O languages.
Java
Java
Java
Java
Java
C#
Eiffel
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
+
+
+
−
+
+
+
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
yes
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
pose some of the formidable problems of bridging wildly different abstraction levels,
which C2Eif had to deal with.
TXL [2] is an expressive programming language designed to support source code
analysis and transformation. It has been used to implement several language translation frameworks such as from Java to TCL and to Python. We could have used TXL
to implement C2Eif; using regular Eiffel, however, allowed us to be independent of
third-party closed-source tools, and to retain complete control over the implemented
functionalities.
Safer C. Many techniques exist aimed at ameliorating the safety of existing C code;
for example, detection of format string vulnerability [3], out-of-bound array accesses
and other memory errors [28, 24], or type errors [23]. C2Eif has a different scope, as
it offers improved safety and debuggability as side-benefits of automatically porting
C programs to Eiffel. This shares a little similarity with Ellison and Rosu’s formal
executable semantics of C [7], which also finds errors in C program as a “side effect”
of a rigorous translation.
5.3
Object-Oriented Reengineering
After code written in a procedural language has been migrated to an object-oriented environment, it is natural to reengineer it to conform to the object-oriented design style,
taking full advantage of features such as inheritance; this is the goal of object-oriented
reengineering. Object-oriented reengineering is beyond the scope of this paper; and we
tackled it in follow-up work based on C2Eif which we mention in Section 6. Nonetheless, it is still useful to compare existing approaches to reengineering with C2Eif, solely
based on features such as degree of automation and tool support; see our follow-up
work [41] for a discussion focused on the object-oriented reengineering techniques.
Table 5 summarizes some features of the main approaches to object-oriented reengineering of procedural code:
• The source and the target languages (or if it is a generic methodology).
28
full language
evaluated
methodology
methodology
C–C++
C–C++
C–C++
C++–C++
Cobol–OOSM
Cobol–Java
Cobol–Java
PL/I–Java
C–Eiffel
completely
automatic
Gall [11]
Jacobson [14]
Livadas [17]
Kontogiannis [16]
Frakes [10]
Fanta [8]
Newcomb [26]
Mossienko [21]
Sneed [33]
Sneed [31]
C2Eif
tool support
source–target
Table 5: Comparison of approaches to O-O reengineering.
no
no
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
yes
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
no
yes
yes
yes
–
–
no
?
no
no
no
no
no
no
yes
yes
yes
no
10KL
2KL
120KL
168KL
25KL
200KL
10KL
932KL
YES
• Whether tool support was developed, that is whether there exists a tool or the
paper explicitly mentions the implementation of a tool. A YES in small caps
denotes the only currently publicly available tool, namely C2Eif.
• Whether the approach is completely automatic, that is does not require any user
input other than providing a source procedural program.
• Whether the approach supports the full source language (as used in practice) or
only a subset thereof.
• Whether the approach has been evaluated, that is whether the paper mentions
evidence, such as a case study, that the approach was tried on real programs. If
available, the table indicates the size of the programs used in the evaluation.
Newcomb’s [26] and Sneed’s [33] are the only automatic tools which have been
evaluated on programs of significant size. Newcomb’s tool [26], however, produces hierarchical object-oriented state machine models (OOSM); the mapping from OOSM to
an object-oriented language is out of the scope of the work. Sneed’s tool [33] translates
Cobol to Java; the paper reports that manual corrections of the automatically generated
code were needed to get to a correct translation. While these corrections have successively been incorporated as extensions of the tool, the full Cobol language remains
unsupported, according to the paper.
6
Conclusions and Future Work
This paper presented the complete translation of C applications into Eiffel, and its implementation into the freely available automatic tool C2Eif. C2Eif supports the com29
plete C language, including unrestricted pointer arithmetic and pre-compiled libraries.
Experiments in the paper showed that C2Eif correctly translates complete applications
and libraries of significant size, and takes advantage of some of Eiffel’s advanced features to produce code of good quality.
Future work. Future work will improve the readability and maintainability of the
generated code. CIL, in particular, optimizes the code for program analysis, which
is sometimes detrimental to readability of the Eiffel code generated by C2Eif. For
example, CIL does not preserve comments, which are therefore lost in translation. We
will also optimize the helper classes to improve on the few performance bottlenecks
mentioned in Section 4.2.
A major follow-up to the work described in this paper is the object-oriented reengineering of C code translated to Eiffel. In recent work [41], we have developed an
automatic reengineering technique, and implemented it atop the translation produced
by C2Eif and described in the present paper. The technique encapsulates functions and
type definitions into classes that achieve low coupling and high cohesion, and introduces inheritance and contracts when possible. Other future work still remains in the
direction of reengineering, such as in automatically replacing C data structure implementations (e.g., hash tables) with their Eiffel equivalents.
References
[1] B. L. Achee and Doris L Carver. Creating object-oriented designs from legacy
FORTRAN code. Journal of Systems and Software, 39(2):179–194, 1997.
[2] James R. Cordy. The TXL source transformation language. Sci. Comput. Program., 61(3):190–210, 2006.
[3] Crispin Cowan. FormatGuard: Automatic protection from printf format string
vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 10th USENIX Security Symposium, 2001.
[4] CWE-134. Uncontrolled format string. http://cwe.mitre.org/data/
definitions/134.html.
[5] Andrea de Lucia, Giuseppe A. Di Lucca, Anna Rita Fasolino, Patrizia Guerra, and
Silvia Petruzzelli. Migrating legacy systems towards object-oriented platforms.
Proc. of ICSM, pages 122–129, 1997.
[6] W. C. Dietrich, Jr., L. R. Nackman, and F. Gracer. Saving legacy with objects.
SIGPLAN Not., 24(10):77–83, 1989.
[7] Chucky Ellison and Grigore Rosu. An executable formal semantics of C with
applications. In POPL, pages 533–544, 2012.
[8] R. Fanta and V. Rajlich. Reengineering object-oriented code. In International
Conference on Software Maintenance, 1998. Proceedings, pages 238–246, 1998.
[9] FFI. A portable foreign function interface library.
redhat.com/libffi/, 2011.
30
http://sources.
[10] William Frakes, Gregory Kulczycki, and Natasha Moodliar. An empirical comparison of methods for reengineering procedural software systems to objectoriented systems. In ICSR, volume 5030 of LNCS, pages 376–389, 2008.
[11] H. Gall and R. Klosch. Finding objects in procedural programs: an alternative
approach. In WCRE, pages 208–216. IEEE, 1995.
[12] Carlo Ghezzi and Mehdi Jazayeri. Programming Language Concepts. Wiley, 3rd
edition, 1998.
[13] David Harel. On folk theorems. Commun. ACM, 23(7):379–389, 1980.
[14] Ivar Jacobson and Fredrik Lindström. Reengineering of old systems to an objectoriented architecture. In OOPSLA, pages 340–350. ACM, 1991.
[15] Kostas Kontogiannis and Prashant Patil. Evidence driven object identification in
procedural code. In STEP, pages 12–21, 1999.
[16] Kostas Kontogiannis and Prashant Patil. Evidence driven object identification in
procedural code. In STEP, pages 12–21. IEEE, 1999.
[17] Panos E. Livadas and Theodore Johnson. A new approach to finding objects in
programs. Journal of Software Maintenance, 6(5):249–260, 1994.
[18] Johannes Martin and Hausi A. Müller. Strategies for migration from C to Java.
In CSMR, pages 200–210. IEEE Computer Society, 2001.
[19] Johannes Martin and Hausi A. Müller. C to Java migration experiences. In CSMR,
pages 143–153. IEEE Computer Society, 2002.
[20] Bertrand Meyer. Object-Oriented Software Construction. Prentice Hall, 2nd edition, 1997.
[21] M. Mossienko. Automated Cobol to Java recycling. In CSMR, pages 40–50.
IEEE, 2003.
[22] George C. Necula, Scott McPeak, S.P. Rahul, and Westley Weimer. CIL: Intermediate Language and Tools for Analysis and Transformation of C Programs. In
Conference on Compilier Construction, pages 213–228, 2002.
[23] George C. Necula, Scott McPeak, and Westley Weimer. CCured: type-safe
retrofitting of legacy code. In POPL, pages 128–139, 2002.
[24] Nicholas Nethercote and Julian Seward. Valgrind: a framework for heavyweight
dynamic binary instrumentation. In PLDI, pages 89–100, 2007.
[25] P. Newcomb and G. Kotik. Reengineering procedural into object-oriented systems. In WCRE, pages 237–249, 1995.
[26] P. Newcomb and G. Kotik. Reengineering procedural into object-oriented systems. In WCRE, pages 237–249. IEEE, 1995.
31
[27] Novosoft. C2J: a C to Java translator. http://www.novosoft-us.com/
solutions/product_c2j.shtml, 2001.
[28] Yutaka Oiwa. Implementation of the memory-safe full ANSI-C compiler. In
Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGPLAN conference on Programming language
design and implementation, PLDI ’09, pages 259–269, New York, NY, USA,
2009. ACM.
[29] Dennis Ritchie. The development of the C language. In History of Programming
Languages Conference (HOPL-II) Preprints, pages 201–208, 1993.
[30] Miguel A. Serrano, Doris L. Carver, and Carlos Montes de Oca. Reengineering
legacy systems for distributed environments. J. Syst. Softw., 64(1):37–55, 2002.
[31] H. Sneed. Migrating PL/I code to Java. In CSMR, pages 287–296. IEEE, 2011.
[32] H.M. Sneed. Migration of procedurally oriented Cobol programs in an objectoriented architecture. In Software Maintenance, pages 105–116, 1992.
[33] H.M. Sneed. Migrating from COBOL to Java. In ICSM, pages 1–7. IEEE, 2010.
[34] Gokul V. Subramaniam and Eric J. Byrne. Deriving an object model from legacy
Fortran code. ICSM, pages 3–12, 1996.
[35] Ricky Sward. Extracting ada 95 objects from legacy ada programs. In Albert
Llamosı́ and Alfred Strohmeier, editors, Reliable Software Technologies - AdaEurope 2004, volume 3063 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 65–77.
Springer, 2004.
[36] Tangible Software Solutions. C++ to C# and C++ to Java. http://www.
tangiblesoftwaresolutions.com/.
[37] Andrey A. Terekhov and Chris Verhoef. The realities of language conversions.
IEEE Software, 17(6):111–124, 2000.
[38] The Language Popularity Index. http://lang-index.sourceforge.
net, 2011.
[39] Eli Tilevich. Translating C++ to Java. In First German Java Developers’ Conference Journal, Sun Microsystems Press. IEEE Computer Society, 1997.
[40] Marco Trudel, Carlo A. Furia, and Martin Nordio. Automatic C to O-O translation with C2Eiffel. In Rocco Oliveto, Denys Poshyvanyk, James Cordy, and
Thomas Dean, editors, Proceedings of the 19th Working Conference on Reverse
Engineering (WCRE’12), pages 508–509. IEEE Computer Society, October 2012.
Tool demonstration paper.
[41] Marco Trudel, Carlo A. Furia, Martin Nordio, and Bertrand Meyer. Really automatic scalable object-oriented reengineering. In Giuseppe Castagna, editor,
Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming
(ECOOP), volume 7920 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 477–501.
Springer, July 2013.
32
[42] Marco Trudel, Carlo A. Furia, Martin Nordio, Bertrand Meyer, and Manuel Oriol.
C to O-O translation: Beyond the easy stuff. In Rocco Oliveto, Denys Poshyvanyk, James Cordy, and Thomas Dean, editors, Proceedings of the 19th Working
Conference on Reverse Engineering (WCRE’12), pages 19–28. IEEE Computer
Society, October 2012.
[43] Marco Trudel, Manuel Oriol, Carlo A. Furia, and Martin Nordio. Automated
translation of Java source code to Eiffel. In TOOLS Europe, volume 6705 of
LNCS, pages 20–35, 2011.
[44] Julian Tschannen, Carlo A. Furia, Martin Nordio, and Bertrand Meyer. Usable
verification of object-oriented programs by combining static and dynamic techniques. In SEFM, volume 7041 of LNCS, pages 382–398, 2011.
[45] Theo Wiggerts, Hans Bosma, and Erwin Fielt. Scenarios for the identification of
objects in legacy systems. In WCRE, pages 24–32, 1997.
[46] A. Yeh, D. Harris, and H. Reubenstein. Recovering abstract data types and object
instances from a conventional procedural language. In WCRE, pages 227–236,
1995.
[47] Ying Zou and Kostas Kontogiannis. A framework for migrating procedural code
to object-oriented platforms. In APSEC, pages 390–399, 2001.
33
| 6cs.PL
|
arXiv:1704.01302v1 [math.ST] 5 Apr 2017
Extremes in Random Graphs Models of
Complex Networks
Natalia Markovich1
V.A.Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Profsoyuznaya 65, 117997 Moscow, Russia,
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology State University, Kerchenskaya 1,
117303 Moscow, Russia,
(E-mail: [email protected])
Abstract. Regarding the analysis of Web communication, social and complex networks the fast finding of most influential nodes in a network graph constitutes an
important research problem. We use two indices of the influence of those nodes,
namely, PageRank and a Max-linear model. We consider the PageRank as an autoregressive process with a random number of random coefficients that depend on
ranks of incoming nodes and their out-degrees and assume that the coefficients are
independent and distributed with regularly varying tail and with the same tail index.
Then it is proved that the tail index and the extremal index are the same for both
PageRank and the Max-linear model and the values of these indices are found. The
achievements are based on the study of random sequences of a random length and
the comparison of the distribution of their maxima and linear combinations.
Keywords: Extremal Index, PageRank, Max-Linear Model, Branching Process, Autoregressive Process, Complex Networks.
1
Introduction
Regarding the analysis of Web communication, social and complex networks
the fast finding of most influential nodes in a network graph constitutes an
important research problem. PageRank remains the most popular characteristic of such influence. We aim to find an extremal index of PageRank whose
reciprocal value determines the first hitting time, i.e. a minimal time to reach
the first influential node by means of a PageRank random walk. The extremal
index θ ∈ [0, 1] has many other interpretations and plays a significant role in
the theory of extreme values. Particularly, the limit distribution of maxima of
stationary random variables (r.v.s) depends on θ. For independent r.v.s θ = 1
holds.
θ has a connection to the tail index that shows the heaviness of the tail of a
stationary distribution of an underlying process.
Google’s PageRank defines the rank R(Xi ) of the Web page Xi as
R(Xi ) = c
X
Xj ∈N (Xi )
R(Xj )
+ (1 − c)qi ,
Dj
i = 1, ..., n,
(1)
where N (Xi ) is the set of pages that link to Xi (in-degree), Dj is the number
of outgoing links of page Xj (out-degree), c ∈ (0, 1) is a damping factor, q =
(q1 , q2 , ..., qn ) is P
a personalization probability vector or user preference such
n
that qi ≥ 0 and i=1 qi = 1, and n is the total number of pages, [11]. We omit
in (1) the term with dangling nodes for simplicity.
PageRank of a randomly selected page (a node in the graph) with random inand out-degrees may be considered as a branching process (Cf. [4], [5], [14])
Ri =
Ni
X
(j)
Aj Ri + Qi , i = 1, ..., n,
(2)
j=1
(j)
denoting Ri = R(Xi ), Aj =d c/Dj , Qi = (1 − c)qi , [14]. Ri are ranks of
descendants of node i, i.e. nodes with incoming links to node i. The r.v. Ni
determines an in-degree, i.e. a number of directed edges to the ith node, and
a number of nodes in the first generation of descendants belonging to the ith
node as a parent, {Qi } is a sequence of i.i.d. r.v.s.
Starting from the initial page (node) X0 , a PageRank random walk determines a regenerative process or Harris recurrent process {Xt }, letting it visits
pages-followers of the underlying node with probability c and it restarts with
probability 1 − c by jumping to a random independent node.
A Max-linear model can be considered as an alternative characteristic of the
node influence. This model is obtained by a substitution of sums in Google’s
definition of PageRank by maxima, i.e.
Ri =
Ni
_
(j)
Aj Ri ∨ Qi , i = 1, ..., n,
(3)
j=1
is proposed in [6].
Formally, (2) can be considered as an autoregressive process with the random
number Ni of random coefficients and the independent random term Qi . The
extremal index of AR(1) processes with regularly varying stationary distribution and its relation to the tail index were considered in [9]. The extremal
index of AR(q), q ≥ 1 processes with q random coefficients was obtained in [10]
in a form which is not convenient for calculations. In [7] the results by [9] were
extended to multivariate regularly varying distributed random sequences and
the extremal and tail indices of sum and maxima of such sequences with l ≥ 1
r.v.s were derived.
Our achievements extend and adapt the results by [7] to PageRank and Maxlinear processes. The problem concerns the finding of the extremal index of a
random graph that models a real network where incoming nodes of the root
node may be linked and, hence, be dependent. Such a random graph is called
a Thorny Branching Tree (TBT) since any node may have outbound stubs
(teleportations) to arbitrary nodes of the network, [4]. In this respect, such a
graph cannot be considered as a pure Galton-Watson branching process where
descendants of any node are mutually independent and teleportations are impossible.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we recall necessary results regarding the relation between the tail and extremal indices obtained in [7] for
multivariate random sequences which are regularly varying distributed (Theorems 1 and 2). Linear combinations and maxima of the random sequences of a
fixed length are considered and it is derived that they have the same tail and
extremal indices. In Section 3 we extend Theorem 2 to the case of unequal
tail indices assuming r.v.s of a random sequence (Theorem 3). In Section 4 we
consider sequences of random lengths and obtain the tail and extremal indices
of their linear combinations and maxima (Theorem 4). We further discuss
how these results can be applied to PageRank and the Max-linear processes in
Section 5.
2
Related Work
Let {Rj } be a stationary sequence with distribution function F (x) and maxima
Mn = max1≤j≤n Rj . We shall interpret {Rj } as PageRanks of Web pages.
Definition 1. A stationary sequence {Rn }n≥1 is said to have extremal index
θ ∈ [0, 1] if for each 0 < τ < ∞ there is a sequence of real numbers un = un (τ )
such that
lim n(1 − F (un )) = τ
and
(4)
n→∞
lim P {Mn ≤ un } = e−τ θ
(5)
n→∞
hold ([12], p.53).
In [7] the following theorems are proved which we will use to find the extremal
(l)
(2)
(1)
and tail indices of PageRank and a Max-linear model. Let Yn , Yn , ..., Yn ,
n ≥ 1, l ≥ 1 be sequences of r.v.s having stationary distributions with tail
indices k1 , ..., kl and extremal indices θ1 , ..., θl , respectively, i.e.
P {Yn(i) > x} ∼ c(i) x−ki
as
x → ∞,
(i)
where c are some real positive constants.
Let us consider the weighted sum
Yn (z) = z1 Yn(1) + z2 Yn(2) + ... + zl Yn(l) ,
z1 , ..., zl > 0
(6)
and denote its tail index by k(z) and extremal index by θ(z). Supposing that
there is a minimal tail index among k1 , ..., kl , the following theorem states the
corresponding k(z) and θ(z).
Theorem 1. ([7]) Let k1 < ki , i = 2, ..., l hold. Then Yn (z) has the tail index
k(z) = k1 and the extremal index θ(z) = θ1 .
(1)
(2)
(l)
In the next theorem it is assumed that sequences Yn , Yn , ..., Yn are mutually independent with equal tail indices k1 = ... = kl = k. We denote
(7)
Yn∗ (z) = max z1 Yn(1) , z2 Yn(2) , ..., zl Yn(l) .
Theorem 2. ([7]) The sequences Yn∗ (z) and Yn (z) have the same tail index k
and the same extremal index equal to
θ(z) =
c(1) z1k
c(l) zlk
θ
+
...
+
θl .
1
c(1) z1k + ... + c(l) zlk
c(1) z1k + ... + c(l) zlk
3
Generalization of Theorem 2
Theorem 3 is a generalization of Theorem 2 to the case of unequal tail indices.
(j)
Theorem 3. Let {Yn }, n ≥ 1, j = 1, ..., l be mutually independent regularly
varying r.v.s with tail indices k1 , ..., kl , respectively. Let km < ki , i = 1, ..., l,
i 6= m hold. Then r.v.s Yn∗ (z) and Yn (z) have the same tail index k(z) = km
and the same extremal index θ(z) = θm .
Proof. First we show that
P {Yn∗ (z) > x} ∼ c(z)x−km ,
Pl
where c(z) =
i=1
x → ∞,
(8)
c(i) ziki 1{ki = km }. Similar to [7] and as
P {zi Yn(i) > x} ∼ c(i) ziki x−ki
(9)
holds, we have
P {Yn∗ (z) > x} = P {max(z1 Yn(1) , .., zl Yn(l) ) > x}
= 1 − P {max(z1 Yn(1) ≤ x} · ... · P {zl Yn(l) ) ≤ x}
=
l
X
+
l
X
(−1)
∼
l
X
c(i) ziki x−ki
+
l
X
(−1)k−1
P {zi Yn(i) > x}
i=1
k−1
l
X
P {zi1 Yn(i1 ) > x} · ... · P {zik Yn(ik ) > x}
l
X
c(i1 ) zi1 1 x−ki1 · ... · c(ik ) zik k x−kik
i1 <i2 <...<ik ;i1 ,i2 ,...,ik =1
k=2
i=1
ki
ki
i1 <i2 <...<ik ;i1 ,i2 ,...,ik =1
k=2
−km
∼ c(z)x
+ o(x−km ),
x → ∞.
(10)
Thus, P {Yn (z) > x} ∼ c(z)x−km follows from Theorem 1.
Now we show that Yn∗ (z) and Yn (z) have the same extremal index θ(z) = θm .
We use the same notations as in [7]
(i)
(i)
Mn(i) = max{Y1 , Y2 , ..., Yn(i) }, i = 1, .., l;
Mn (z) = max{Y1 (z), Y2 (z), ..., Yn (z)},
Mn∗ (z) = max{Y1∗ (z), Y2∗ (z), ..., Yn∗ (z)}, n ≥ 1.
By (7) it holds
(1)
(l)
Mn∗ (z) = max{z1 Y1 , ..., z1 Yn(1) , ..., zl Y1 , ..., zl Yn(l) }
= max{z1 Mn(1) , ..., zl Mn(l) }.
Then we get
P {Mn∗ (z)n−1/k ≤ x} = P {z1 Mn(1) n−1/k ≤ x, ..., zl Mn(l) n−1/k ≤ x} (11)
Since km is the minimal tail index we have
P {zi Mn(i) n−1/km ≤ x} = P {zi Mn(i) n−1/ki ≤ xn1/km −1/ki }.
It implies
zi Mn(i) n−1/km →P 0, i = 1, ..., l, i 6= m as n → ∞
(12)
(i)
since limn→∞ P {zi Mn n−1/ki ≤ x} = exp(−c(i) θi ziki x−ki ). By (11) it holds
km
θm x−km ),
P {Mn∗ (z)n−1/km ≤ x} → exp(−c(m) zm
n → ∞.
Now we have to show that P {Mn∗ (z)n−1/km ≤ x} ∼ P {Mn (z)n−1/km ≤ x}.
Let us denote un = xn1/km . Note that the event {Mn∗ (z) ≤ un } follows from
{Mn (z) ≤ un }. Then, as in [7], we obtain
0 ≤ P {Mn∗ (z) ≤ un } − P {Mn (z) ≤ un }
(13)
∗
∗
= P {Mn (z) ≤ un } − P {Mn (z) ≤ un , Mn (z) ≤ un }
n
X
= P {Mn∗ (z) ≤ un , Mn (z) > un } ≤
P {Mn∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un }
k=1
≤
n
X
P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un } = nP {Yn∗ (z) ≤ un , Yn (z) > un }
k=1
due to the stationarity of the sequences Yn∗ (z) and Yn (z). Lemma 1 in [7] states
that
P {Yn∗ (z) ≤ un |Yn (z) > un } → 0,
n → ∞,
(14)
(j)
for i.i.d. regularly varying {Yn } with equal tail index. This can be extended
to the case of unequal k1 , ..., kl . Since
nP {Yn (z) > un } → c(z)x−km ,
n → ∞,
(15)
and (14) hold, it follows
lim (P {Mn∗ (z) ≤ un } − P {Mn (z) ≤ un }) = 0.
n→∞
4
Extremal Index of PageRank and the Max-Linear
Processes
(j)
(j)
(j)
We denote in (2) Ri as Yi (z) and Aj Ri = cRi /Dj , j = 1, ..., Ni as zj Yi .
Then we can represent (2) in the form (6) as
Yi (z) =
Ni
X
j=1
(j)
zj Yi
+ Qi ,
i = 1, ..., n,
(16)
where Ni is a nonnegative integer-valued r.v.. In the context of PageRank
zj = c, j = 1, 2, ..., Ni , Qi = z ∗ qi with z ∗ = 1 − c and Ni represents the node
in-degree. It is realistic to assume that Ni is a power law distributed r.v. with
parameter α > 0, i.e.
P {Ni = ℓ} ∼ ℓ−α
(17)
and Ni is bounded by a total number of nodes in the network.
The distribution of Ni is in the domain of attraction of the Fréchet distribution
with shape parameter α > 0 and P {Ni > x} = x−α ℓ(x), ∀x > 0, where ℓ(x) is
a slowly varying function, since it satisfies a sufficient condition for this property, i.e. the von Mises type condition limn→∞ nP {Ni = n}/P {Ni > n} = α,
[1].
Theorem 4 is an extension of Theorems 2 and 3 to maxima and sums of multivariate random sequences of random lengths, that can be applied to PageRank
and the Max-linear processes. Let us turn to (16) and denote
YN∗n (z) = max(z1 Yn(1) , .., zNn Yn(Nn ) , Qn ),
YNn (z) = z1 Yn(1) + .. + zNn Yn(Nn ) + Qn .
(j)
Theorem 4. Let {Yn }, n ≥ 1, j = 1, ..., Nn and qn = Qn /z ∗ be mutually
independent regularly varying i.i.d. r.v.s with tail indices k > 0 and β >
0, respectively, and Nn be regularly varying r.v. with tail index α > 0. Let
(1)
(N )
Yn ,.., Yn n have extremal indices θ1 , ..., θNn , respectively. Then r.v.s YN∗n (z)
and YNn (z) are regularly varying distributed with the same tail index k(z) =
min(k, α, β) and the same extremal index θ(z) such that
θ(z) = (z ∗ )β , if k ≥ β,
∞
X
c(i) θi zik /c(z), if k < β,
θ(z) =
(18)
i=1
where c(z) =
P∞
i=1
c(i) zik holds.
Proof. We shall show first that
P {YN∗n (z) > x} ∼ P {YNn (z) > x} ∼ x− min(k,α,β) .
(19)
(j)
Since r.v.s {Yn }j≥1 are subexponential and i.i.d. it holds
P {z1 Yn(1) + .. + z⌊x⌋ Yn(⌊x⌋) > x} ∼ P {max(z1 Yn(1) , .., z⌊x⌋ Yn(⌊x⌋) ) > x}
∼ xP {z1 Yn(1) > x},
x → ∞,
(20)
(j)
[8]. Due to mutual independence of Qn and {Yn } and similar to (10) we get
P {YN∗n (z) > x} = P {YN∗n (z) > x, Nn ≤ x} + P {YN∗n (z) > x, Nn > x}
∗
(z) > x} + P {Nn > x}
≤ P {Y⌊x⌋
= 1 − P {max(z1 Yn(1) , .., z⌊x⌋ Yn(⌊x⌋) ) ≤ x}P {Qn ≤ x} + P {Nn > x}
∼ cN x−α + cq (z ∗ )β x−β + c(z)x−k ∼ x− min{k,α,β} ,
(21)
as x → ∞, where cN , cq > 0, c(z) =
P∞
i=1
c(i) zik . On the other hand,
P {YN∗n (z) > x} ≥ 0 + P {YN∗n (z) > x, Nn > x}
∗
∗
(z) ≤ x, Nn ≤ x} − 1
(z) > x} + P {Nn > x} + P {Y⌈x⌉
≥ P {Y⌈x⌉
∼ x− min{k,α,β}
(22)
∗
holds, since P {Y⌈x⌉
(z) ≤ x, Nn ≤ x} → 1 as x → ∞. Due to (21) and (22) we
obtain
P {YN∗n (z) > x} ∼ x− min{k,α,β} .
The same is valid for YNn (z) by substitution of the maximum by the sum due
to (20). Hence, (19) follows.
Let us prove that YN∗n (z) and YNn (z) have the same extremal index θ(z). Let
us denote
∗
(z) = max{YN∗1 (z), YN∗2 (z), ..., YN∗n (z)}
MN
n
(N1 )
(1)
= max{z1 Y1 , ..., zN1 Y1
(23)
, Q1 , ..., z1 Yn(1) , ..., zNn Yn(Nn ) , Qn }
and
MNn (z) = max{YN1 (z), YN2 (z), ..., YNn (z)}
(1)
= max{z1 Y1
(N1 )
+ ... + zN1 Y1
+ Q1 , ..., z1 Yn(1) + ... + zNn Yn(Nn ) + Qn }.
Without loss of generality we may assume that Nn = max{N1 , ..., Nn }. Then
(N )
(1)
we can complete vectors (z1 Yi , ..., zNi Yi i ), i = 1, 2, ..., n by zeros up to the
dimension Nn and separate the vector (Q1 , ..., Qn ). We rewrite (23) as
(1)
∗
(z) = max{z1 Y1 , ..., z1 Yn(1) , ..., zNn · 0, ..., zNn · 0, ..., zNn Yn(Nn ) ,
MN
n
Q1 , ..., Qn }
= max(z1 Mn(1) , z2 Mn(2) , ..., zNn Mn(Nn ) , Mn(Q) ).
(Q)
Here, Mn = max{Q1 , ..., Qn } relates to the second term in the rhs of (16)
corresponding to the user preference term Qi in (2). Following the same arguments as after (11) in Section 3 the statement follows. Really, denoting
∗
k ∗ = min{k, β} and un = xn1/k , x > 0, we get
∗
(z) > un }
P {MN
n
∗
∗
(z) > un , Nn ≤ un }
= P {MNn (z) > un , Nn > un } + P {MN
n
∗
(z) > un } + P {Nn > un }.
≤ P {M⌈u
n⌉
On the other hand,
∗
∗
(z) > un } ≥ P {M⌈u
(z) > un , Nn > un }
P {MN
n
n⌉
∗
∗
(z) ≤ un , Nn ≤ un } − 1.
= P {Nn > un } + P {M⌈un ⌉ (z) > un } + P {M⌈u
n⌉
∗
Note that P {M⌈u
(z) ≤ un , Nn ≤ un } − 1 tends to zero as n → ∞. Hence, it
n⌉
holds
∗
∗
(z) > un } + P {Nn > un }, n → ∞. (24)
(z) > un } ∼ P {M⌈u
P {MN
n
n⌉
(Q)
(i)
∗
If k < β holds, then Mn · n−1/k →P 0 as n → ∞ since P {zi Mn n−1/k ≤
x} → exp(−c(i) θi zik x−k ), i = 1, 2, .... Since P {Nn > un } ∼ u−α
n → 0 as n → ∞
holds, then by (24) it follows
∗
∗
(z)n−1/k ≤ x} = exp{−c(z)θ∗ (z)x−k },
lim P {MN
n
n→∞
(25)
P∞
P∞
where θ∗ (z) = i=1 c(i) θi zik /c(z) and c(z) = i=1 c(i) zik .
∗
(i)
(Q)
If k ≥ β holds, then zi Mn ·n−1/k →P 0, i = 1, 2, ... follows since P {Mn n−1/β ≤
∗ β −β
x} → exp(−cq (z ) x ) as n → ∞. Thus, we obtain
∗
∗
(z)n−1/k ≤ x} = exp(−cq (z ∗ )β x−β ).
lim P {MN
n
n→∞
(26)
Since {qi } are i.i.d., its extremal index is equal to one. Then by (25) and (26)
the extremal index of YN∗n (z) satisfies (18) irrespectively of α.
It remains to show that YN∗n (z) and YNn (z) have the same extremal index.
Similarly to [7], we have to derive that
∗
∗
∗
(z)n−1/k ≤ x}.
lim P {MNn (z)n−1/k ≤ x} = lim P {MN
n
n→∞
n→∞
(27)
∗
Since from the event {MNn (z) ≤ un } it follows {MN
(z) ≤ un }, and P {MNn (z) ≤
n
∗
un } ≤ P {MNn (z) ≤ un } holds, we obtain similarly to (13)
∗
(z) ≤ un } − P {MNn (z) ≤ un }
0 ≤ P {MN
n
∗
∗
(z) ≤ un , MNn (z) ≤ un }
(z) ≤ un } − P {MN
= P {MN
n
n
∗
= P {MNn (z) ≤ un , MNn (z) > un }
∗
(z) ≤ un , MNn (z) > un , Nn > un }
= P {MN
n
∗
(z) ≤ un , MNn (z) > un , Nn ≤ un }
+ P {MN
n
∗
(z) ≤ un , M⌊un ⌋ (z) > un , Nn ≤ un }
≤ P {Nn > un } + P {MN
n
⌊un ⌋
≤ P {Nn > un } +
X
P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un }
k=1
= P {Nn > un } + ⌊un ⌋P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un }
due to the stationarity of {Yk∗ (z)} and {Yk (z)}.
(1)
(N )
Completing vectors (z1 Yk , ..., zNk Yk k ) by zeroes
(28)
up to the maximal dimen-
sion ⌊un ⌋, we get
(1)
(⌊un ⌋)
P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un } = P {max(z1 Yk , ..., z⌊un ⌋ Yk
(1)
z1 Yk
(⌊un ⌋)
+ ... + z⌊un ⌋ Yk
, Qk ) ≤ un ,
+ Qk > un }
Then (27) follows from (14) and (15) since in (28)
P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un , Yk (z) > un } = P {Yk (z) > un }P {Yk∗ (z) ≤ un |Yk (z) > un }
holds.
5
Application to Indices of Complex Networks
Theorem 4 can be applied to PageRank and the Max-linear processes. These
processes then have the same tail index and the same extremal index. Theorem
4 is in the agreement with statements in [5] and [14], namely, that the stationary
PNi
(j)
+ Qi is regularly varying and
distribution of PageRank R =d
j=1 Aj Ri
its tail index is determined by a most heavy-tailed distributed term in the
(j)
triple (Ni , Qi , Ai Ri ). This is derived if all terms in the triple are mutually
independent. In contrast, Theorem 4 is valid for an arbitrary dependence
(j)
structure between Nn and {Yn } as well as Nn and Qn , and {Ni } are not
necessarily independent. The novelty of Theorem 4 is that the extremal index
of both PageRank and the Max-linear processes is the same and it depends on
(j)
the tail indices in the couple (Qi , Ai Ri ), irrespective of the tail index of Ni .
The assumptions of both Theorem 4 and the statements in [5] and [14] do
not reflect properly the complicated dependence between node ranks due to
the entanglement of links in a real network. For better understanding let us
consider the matrix
(N )
(1)
(2)
0
0
Q1
z1 Y1 z2 Y1 ...zN1 Y1 1
z1 Y2(1) z2 Y2(2) ...zN1 Y2(N1 ) ...zN2 Y2(N2 )
0
Q2
...
...
...
...
...
...
(N )
(N )
(N )
(1)
(2)
z1 Yn z2 Yn ...zN1 Yn 1 ...zN2 Yn 2 ...zNn Yn n Qn
(k, θ1 ) (k, θ2 ) ...(k, θN1 ) ...(k, θN2 ) ......(k, θNn ) ...(β, (z ∗ )β )
corresponding to (16) and completed by zeros up to the maximal dimension,
let’s say Nn . Strings of the matrix correspond to generations of descendants
of nodes with numbers 1, 2, ..., n. Each column may contain descendants of
different nodes having the same extremal index θi , i = 1, 2, ..., Nn . All columns
apart of the last one are identically regularly varying distributed with the same
tail index k. The columns are mutually independent.
In terms of some network, the conditions of Theorem 4 imply that ranks of
all nodes with incoming links to a root node (i.e. its followers) are mutually
independent, but followers of different nodes may be dependent and, thus, they
are combined into clusters. The reciprocal of the extremal index approximates
the mean cluster size, [12].
The statement (18) implies that the extremal index of PageRank is equal to
θ(z) = (1 − c)β if the user preference dominates (i.e. its distribution tail is
heavier than the tail of ranks of followers). If the damping factor c is close to
one, then θ(z) is close to zero. The latter means the huge-sized cluster of nodes
around a root-node in the presence of rare teleportations. If c is close to zero,
then θ(z) is close to one due to the independence of frequent teleportations. If
k < β holds, then roughly, the mean size of the cluster is determined by the
consolidation of all clusters related to the followers of the underlying root.
In practice, the followers of a node may be linked and their ranks can therefore
be dependent. The future work will focus on the extremal index of PageRank
(j)
process when the terms {Yi } in (16) are mutually dependent.
References
1. C.W. Anderson. Local limit theorems for the maxima of discrete random variables.
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 88, 161–166,
1980.
2. K. Avrachenkov, N. M. Markovich and J.K. Sreedharan. Distribution and Dependence of Extremes in Network Sampling Processes. Computational Social Networks, 2, 12, 1–21, 2015.
3. G.L. O’Brien. Extreme values for stationary and Markov sequences. The Annals of
Probability, 15, 1, 281–291, 1987.
4. N. Chen, N. Litvak and M. Olvera-Cravioto. PageRank in Scale-Free Random
Graphs. WAW 2014, LNCS 8882, ed. A. Bonato et al., Springer, Switzerland,
120–131, 2014.
5. P. R. Jelenkovic and M. Olvera-Cravioto. Information ranking and power laws on
trees. Advances in Applied Probability, 42(4), 1057–1093, 2010.
6. N. Gissibl and C. Klüppelberg. Max-linear models on directed acyclic graphs.
arXiv:1512.07522v1[math.PR], 1–33, 2015.
7. A.A. Goldaeva Indices of multivariate recurrent stochastic sequences. In book ed.
Shiryaev A. N.: Modern problem of mathematics and mechanics, Vol. VIII. Issue
3, 42–51, 2013, Moscow state university ISBN 9785211056527 (In russian)
8. C.M. Goldie and C. Klüppelberg. Subexponential Distributions, A Practical Guide
to Heavy Tails, eds R. Adler, R. Feldman and M.S. Taqqu, Birkhäuser, Boston,
MA, 435–459, 1998
9. L. de Haan, S. Resnick, H. Rootzén and G. de Vries. Extremal behaviour of solutions to a stochastic difference equation with applications to ARCH processes.
Stochastic Processes and Applications, 32, 213–224, 1989.
10. C. Klüppelberg and S. Pergamenchtchikov. Extremal behaviour of models with
multivariate random recurrence representation. Stochastic Processes and their
Applications, 117, 432-456, 2007.
11. A. N. Langville and C. D. Meyer. Google’s PageRank and Beyond: The Science
of Search Engine Rankings, Princeton University Press, 2006.
12. M.R. Leadbetter, G. Lingren and H. Rootzén. Extremes and Related Properties
of Random Sequence and Processes, ch.3, Springer, New York, 1983.
13. H. Rootzén. Maxima and exceedances of stationary markov chains. Advances in
Applied Probability, 20, 371–390, 1988.
14. Y.V. Volkovich and N. Litvak. Asymptotic analysis for personalized web search.
Advances in Applied Probability, 42(2), 577–604, 2010.
| 10math.ST
|
Item Recommendation with Evolving User
Preferences and Experience
∗
Subhabrata Mukherjee† , Hemank Lamba‡ and Gerhard Weikum†
Planck Institute for Informatics, ‡ Carnegie Mellon University
Email: {smukherjee, weikum}@mpi-inf.mpg.de, [email protected]
arXiv:1705.02519v1 [cs.AI] 6 May 2017
† Max
Abstract—Current recommender systems exploit user and item
similarities by collaborative filtering. Some advanced methods
also consider the temporal evolution of item ratings as a global
background process. However, all prior methods disregard the
individual evolution of a user’s experience level and how this is
expressed in the user’s writing in a review community.
In this paper, we model the joint evolution of user experience,
interest in specific item facets, writing style, and rating behavior.
This way we can generate individual recommendations that take
into account the user’s maturity level (e.g., recommending art
movies rather than blockbusters for a cinematography expert).
As only item ratings and review texts are observables, we capture
the user’s experience and interests in a latent model learned from
her reviews, vocabulary and writing style.
We develop a generative HMM-LDA model to trace user
evolution, where the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) traces her
latent experience progressing over time — with solely user
reviews and ratings as observables over time. The facets of a
user’s interest are drawn from a Latent Dirichlet Allocation
(LDA) model derived from her reviews, as a function of her
(again latent) experience level. In experiments with five real-world
datasets, we show that our model improves the rating prediction
over state-of-the-art baselines, by a substantial margin. We also
show, in a use-case study, that our model performs well in the
assessment of user experience levels.
more than recommendations for new blockbusters. Also, the
facets of an item that a user focuses on change with experience.
For example, a mature user pays more attention to narrative,
light effects, and style rather than actors or special effects.
Similar observations hold for ratings of wine, beer, food, etc.
Our approach advances state-of-the-art by tapping review
texts, modeling their properties as latent factors, using them
to explain and predict item ratings as a function of a user’s
experience evolving over time. Prior works considering review
texts (e.g., [12], [15], [18], [23], [24]) did this only to learn
topic similarities in a static, snapshot-oriented manner, without
considering time at all. The only prior work [16], considering
time, ignores the text of user-contributed reviews in harnessing
their experience. However, user experience and their interest
in specific item facets at different timepoints can often be
observed only indirectly through their ratings, and more vividly
through her vocabulary and writing style in reviews.
Use-cases: Consider the reviews and ratings by two users on
a “Canon DSLR” camera about the facet camera lens.
• User 1: My first DSLR. Excellent camera, takes great pictures in
I. I NTRODUCTION
• User 2: The EF 75-300 mm lens is only good to be used outside.
HD, without a doubt it brings honor to its name. [Rating: 5]
The 2.2X HD lens can only be used for specific items; filters are
Motivation and State-of-the-Art: Collaborative filtering algouseless if ISO, AP,... are correct. The short 18-55mm lens is cheap
rithms are at the heart of recommender systems for items like
and should have a hood to keep light off lens. [Rating: 3]
movies, cameras, restaurants and beer. Most of these methods
The second user is clearly more experienced than the first
exploit user-user and item-item similarities in addition to the
one, and more reserved about the lens quality of that camera
history of user-item ratings — similarities being based on
model. Future recommendations for the second user should take
latent factor models over user and item features [11], and more
into consideration the user’s maturity. As a second use-case,
recently on explicit links and interactions among users [6][25].
consider the following reviews of Christopher Nolan movies
All these data evolve over time leading to bursts in item
where the facet of interest is the non-linear narrative style.
popularity and other phenomena like anomalies[7]. State-ofthe-art recommender systems capture these temporal aspects by • User 1 on Memento (2001): “Backwards told is thriller noir-art
empty ultimately but compelling and intriguing this.”
introducing global bias components that reflect the evolution
•
User 2 on The Dark Knight (2008): “Memento was very compliof the user and community as a whole[10]. A few models also
cated. The Dark Knight was flawless. Heath Ledger rocks!”
consider changes in the social neighborhood of users[14]. What
•
User 3 on Inception (2010): “Inception is a triumph of style over
is missing in all these approaches, though, is the awareness of
substance. It is complex only in a structural way, not in terms of
how experience and maturity levels evolve in individual users.
plot. It doesn’t unravel in the way Memento does.”
Individual experience is crucial in how users appreciate items,
and thus react to recommendations. For example, a mature The first user does not appreciate complex narratives, making
cinematographer would appreciate tips on art movies much fun of it by writing her review backwards. The second user
prefers simpler blockbusters. The third user seems to appreciate
∗ This is an extended version of the paper published in ICDM 2015 [20].
the complex narration style of Inception and, more of, Memento.
Refer to [19] for a general (continuous) version of this model with fine-grained
temporal evolution of user experience, and resulting language model using We would consider this maturity level of the more experienced
Geometric Brownian Motion and Brownian Motion, respectively.
User 3 to generate future recommendations to her.
Approach: We model the joint evolution of user experience,
interests in specific item facets, writing style, and rating
behavior in a community. As only item ratings and review
texts are directly observed, we capture a user’s experience
and interests by a latent model learned from her reviews, and
vocabulary. All this is conditioned on time, considering the
maturing rate of a user. Intuitively, a user gains experience
not only by writing many reviews, but she also needs to
continuously improve the quality of her reviews. This varies for
different users, as some enter the community being experienced.
This allows us to generate individual recommendations that take
into account the user’s maturity level and interest in specific
facets of items, at different timepoints.
We develop a generative HMM-LDA model for a user’s
evolution, where the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) traces her
latent experience progressing over time, and the Latent Dirichlet
Allocation (LDA) model captures her interests in specific item
facets as a function of her (again, latent) experience level.
The only explicit input to our model is the ratings and review
texts upto a certain timepoint; everything else – especially the
user’s experience level – is a latent variable. The output is the
predicted ratings for the user’s reviews following the given
timepoint. In addition, we can derive interpretations of a user’s
experience and interests by salient words in the distributional
vectors for latent dimensions. Although it is unsurprising to see
users writing sophisticated words with more experience, we
observe something more interesting. For instance in specialized
communities like beeradvocate.com and ratebeer.com,
experienced users write more descriptive and fruity words to
depict the beer taste (cf. Table V). Table I shows a snapshot
of the words used at different experience levels to depict the
facets beer taste, movie plot and bad journalism, respectively.
We apply our model to 12.7 million ratings from 0.9 million
users on 0.5 million items in five different communities on
movies, food, beer, and news media, achieving an improvement
of 5% to 35% for the mean squared error for rating predictions
over several competitive baselines. We also show that users
at the same (latent) experience level do indeed exhibit similar
vocabulary, and facet interests. Finally, a use-case study in a
news community to identify experienced citizen journalists
demonstrates that our model captures user maturity fairly well.
Contributions: To summarize, this paper introduces the following novel elements:
a) This is the first work that considers the progression of user
experience as expressed through the text of item reviews,
thereby elegantly combining text and time.
b) An approach to capture the natural smooth temporal
progression in user experience factoring in the maturing
rate of the user, as expressed through her writing.
c) Offers interpretability by learning the vocabulary usage of
users at different levels of experience.
d) A large-scale experimental study in five real world datasets
from different communities like movies, beer and food; and
an interesting use-case study in a news community.
Experience Beer
Movies
News
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
stupid, bizarre
storyline, epic
realism, visceral,
nostalgic
bad, stupid
biased, unfair
opinionated, fallacy, rhetoric
bad, shit
sweet, bitter
caramel finish,
coffee roasted
TABLE I: Vocabulary at different experience levels.
II. OVERVIEW
A. Model Dimensions
Our approach is based on the intuition that there is a strong
coupling between the facet preferences of a user, her experience,
writing style in reviews, and rating behavior. All of these factors
jointly evolve with time for a given user.
We model the user experience progression through discrete
stages, so a state-transition model is natural. Once this decision
is made, a Markovian model is the simplest, and thus natural
choice. This is because the experience level of a user at
the current instant t depends on her experience level at the
previous instant t-1. As experience levels are latent (not directly
observable), a Hidden Markov Model is appropriate. Experience
progression of a user depends on the following factors:
• Maturing rate of the user which is modeled by her activity in
the community. The more engaged a user is in the community,
the higher are the chances that she gains experience and
advances in writing sophisticated reviews, and develops taste
to appreciate specific facets.
• Facet preferences of the user in terms of focusing on
particular facets of an item (e.g., narrative structure rather
than special effects). With increasing maturity, the taste for
particular facets becomes more refined.
• Writing style of the user, as expressed by the language
model at her current level of experience. More sophisticated
vocabulary and writing style indicates higher probability of
progressing to a more mature level.
• Time difference between writing successive reviews. It is
unlikely for the user’s experience level to change from that
of her last review in a short time span (within a few hours
or days).
• Experience level difference: Since it is unlikely for a user to
directly progress to say level 3 from level 1 without passing
through level 2, the model at each instant decides whether
the user should stay at current level l, or progress to l+1.
In order to learn the facet preferences and language model of
a user at different levels of experience, we use Latent Dirichlet
Allocation (LDA). In this work, we assume each review to refer
to exactly one item. Therefore, the facet distribution of items
is expressed in the facet distribution of the review documents.
We make the following assumptions for the generative
process of writing a review by a user at time t at experience
level et :
• A user has a distribution over facets, where the facet
preferences of the user depend on her experience level et .
• A facet has a distribution over words where the words
used to describe a facet depend on the user’s vocabulary at
Level 1: film will happy people back supposed good wouldnt cant
Level 2: storyline believable acting time stay laugh entire start funny
Level 3 & 4: narrative cinema resemblance masterpiece crude
undeniable admirable renowned seventies unpleasant myth nostalgic
Level 5: incisive delirious personages erudite affective dramatis
nucleus cinematographic transcendence unerring peerless fevered
E1
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
0
348
504
597
768
720
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
E1
0
141
126
204
371
E2
146
0
36
129
321
E3
129
39
0
39
202
E4
225
153
42
0
106
E5
430
393
240
125
0
640
E2
384
0
449
551
742
560
480
E3
437
318
0
111
190
400
320
E4
509
352
109
0
138
240
E5
452
164
129
Experience Levels
0
80
0
300
250
200
150
100
160
577
400
350
Experience Levels
Experience Levels
Level 1: stupid people supposed wouldnt pass bizarre totally cant
Level 2:storyline acting time problems evil great times didnt money
ended simply falls pretty
Level 3: movie plot good young epic rock tale believable acting
Level 4: script direction years amount fast primary attractive sense
talent multiple demonstrates establish
Level 5: realism moments filmmaker visual perfect memorable
recommended genius finish details defined talented visceral nostalgia
Experience Levels
50
0
(a) Divergence of language model (b) Divergence of facet preference
as a function of experience.
as a function of experience.
Fig. 1: KL Divergence as a function of experience.
Hypothesis 2: Facet Preferences Depend on
Experience Level.
The second hypothesis underlying our work is that users
experience level et . Table II shows salient words for two at similar levels of experience have similar facet preferences.
facets of Amazon movie reviews at different levels of user In contrast to the LM’s where words are observed, facets are
experience, automatically extracted by our latent model. The latent so that validating or falsifying the second hypothesis is
facets are latent, but we can interpret them as plot/script not straightforward. We performed a three-step study:
and narrative style, respectively.
• We use Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) [2] to compute a
As a sanity check for our assumption of the coupling between
latent facet distribution hfk i of each review.
user experience, rating behavior, language and facet prefer- • We run Support Vector Regression (SVR) [4] for each user.
ences, we perform experimental studies reported next.
The user’s item rating in a review is the response variable,
with the facet proportions in the review given by LDA as
B. Hypotheses and Initial Studies
features. The regression weight wkue is then interpreted as
Hypothesis 1: Writing Style Depends on Experience Level.
the preference of user ue for facet fk .
We expect users at different experience levels to have • Finally, we aggregate these facet preferences for each
divergent Language Models (LM’s) — with experienced users
experience level e to get the
facet preference
P corresponding
ue
ue exp(wk )
having a more sophisticated writing style and vocabulary
distribution given by <
>.
#ue
than amateurs. To test this hypothesis, we performed initial
Figure
1b
shows
the
KL
divergence
between
the facet prefstudies over two popular communities1 : 1) BeerAdvocate erences of users at different experience levels in BeerAdvocate.
(beeradvocate.com) with 1.5 million reviews from 33, 000 We see that the divergence clearly increases with the difference
users and 2) Amazon movie reviews (amazon.com) with 8 in user experience levels; this confirms the hypothesis. The
million reviews from 760, 000 users. Both of these span a heatmap for Amazon is similar and omitted.
period of about 10 years.
Note that Figure 1 shows how a change in the experience
In BeerAdvocate, a user gets points on the basis of likes level can be detected. This is not meant to predict the experience
received for her reviews, ratings from other users, number of level, which is done by the model in Section IV.
posts written, diversity and number of beers rated, time in the
community, etc. We use this points measure as a proxy for the
III. B UILDING B LOCKS OF OUR M ODEL
user’s experience. In Amazon, reviews get helpfulness votes
Our model, presented in the next section, builds on and
from other users. For each user, we aggregate these votes over compares itself against various baseline models as follows.
all her reviews and take this as a proxy for her experience.
We partition the users into 5 bins, based on the points A. Latent-Factor Recommendation
/ helpfulness votes received, each representing one of the
According to the standard latent factor model (LFM) [9],
experience levels. For each bin, we aggregate the review texts the rating assigned by a user u to an item i is given by:
of all users in that bin and construct a unigram language model.
rec(u, i) = βg + βu + βi + hαu , φi i
(1)
The heatmap of Figure 1a shows the Kullback-Leibler (KL)
where h., .i denotes a scalar product. βg is the average rating
divergence between the LM’s of different experience levels,
for the BeerAdvocate case. The Amazon reviews lead to a very of all items by all users. βu is the offset of the average rating
similar heatmap, which is omitted here. The main observation given by user u from the global rating. Likewise βi is the rating
is that the KL divergence is higher — the larger the difference bias for item i. αu and φi are the latent factors associated with
is between the experience levels of two users. This confirms our user u and item i, respectively. These latent factors are learned
hypothesis about the coupling of experience and user language. using gradient descent by minimizing the mean squared error
(M SE) between observed
P ratings r(u, i) and predicted ratings
1 Data available at http://snap.stanford.edu/data/
rec(u, i): M SE = |U1 | u,i∈U (r(u, i) − rec(u, i))2
TABLE II: Salient words for two facets at five experience
levels in movie reviews.
B. Experience-based Latent-Factor Recommendation
The most relevant baseline for our work is the “user at
learned rate” model of [16], which exploits that users at the
same experience level have similar rating behavior even if
their ratings are temporarily far apart. Experience of each user
u for item i is modeled as a latent variable eu,i ∈ {1...E}.
Different recommenders are learned for different experience
levels. Therefore Equation 1 is parameterized as:
receu,i (u, i) = βg (eu,i )+βu (eu,i )+βi (eu,i )+hαu (eu,i ), φi (eu,i )i
(2)
The parameters are learned using Limited Memory BFGS
with the additional constraint that experience levels should be
non-decreasing over the reviews written by a user over time.
However, this is significantly different from our approach. All
of these models work on the basis of only user rating behavior,
and ignore the review texts completely. Additionally, the
smoothness in the evolution of parameters between experience
levels is enforced via L2 regularization, and does not model
the natural user maturing rate (via HMM) as in our model.
Also note that in the above parametrization, an experience level
is estimated for each user-item pair. However, it is rare that a
user reviews the same item multiple times. In our approach,
we instead trace the evolution of users, and not user-item pairs.
C. User-Facet Model
In order to find the facets of interest to a user, [22]
extends Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) to include authorship information. Each document d is considered to have a
distribution over authors. We consider the special case where
each document has exactly one author u associated with a
Multinomial distribution θu over facets Z with a symmetric
Dirichlet prior α. The facets have a Multinomial distribution φz
over words W drawn from a vocabulary V with a symmetric
Dirichlet prior β. Exact inference is not possible due to
the intractable coupling between Θ and Φ. Two ways for
approximate inference are MCMC techniques like Collapsed
Gibbs Sampling and Variational Inference. The latter is typically
much more complex and computationally expensive. In our
work, we thus use sampling.
Fig. 2: Supervised model for user facets and ratings.
Fig. 3: Supervised model for user experience, facets, and ratings.
hyper-parameter α for the document-facet Multinomial distribution Θ is parametrized as αd,z = exp(xTd λz ). The model
is trained using stochastic EM which alternates between 1)
sampling facet assignments from the posterior distribution
conditioned on words and features, and 2) optimizing λ given
the facet assignments using L-BFGS. Our approach, explained
in the next section, follows a similar approach to couple
the User-Facet Model and the Latent-Factor Recommendation
Model (depicted in Figure 2).
IV. J OINT M ODEL : U SER E XPERIENCE ,
FACET P REFERENCE , W RITING S TYLE
We start with a User-Facet Model (UFM) (aka. AuthorTopic Model [22]) based on Latent Dirichlet Allocation
(LDA), where users have a distribution over facets and facets
D. Supervised User-Facet Model
have a distribution over words. This is to determine the
The generative process described above is unsupervised and facets of interest to a user. These facet preferences can be
does not take the ratings in reviews into account. Supervision interpreted as latent item factors in the traditional Latent-Factor
is difficult to build into MCMC sampling where ratings are Recommendation Model (LFM) [9]. However, the LFM is
continuous values, as in communities like newstrust.net. supervised as opposed to the UFM. It is not obvious how to
For discrete ratings, a review-specific Multinomial rating incorporate supervision into the UFM to predict ratings. The
distribution πd,r can be learned as in [13], [21]. Discretizing the user-provided ratings of items can take continuous values (in
continuous ratings into buckets bypasses the problem to some some review communities), so we cannot incorporate them into
extent, but results in loss of information. Other approaches [12], a UFM with a Multinomial distribution of ratings. We propose
[15], [18] overcome this problem by learning the feature an Expectation-Maximization (EM) approach to incorporate
supervision, where the latent facets are estimated in an Eweights separately from the user-facet model.
An elegant approach using Multinomial-Dirichlet Regression Step using Gibbs Sampling, and Support Vector Regression
is proposed in [17] to incorporate arbitrary types of observed (SVR) [4] is used in the M-Step to learn the feature weights
continuous or categorical features. Each facet z is associated and predict ratings. Subsequently, we incorporate a layer for
with a vector λz whose dimension equals the number of features. experience in the UFM-LFM model, where the experience
Assuming xd is the feature vector for document d, the Dirichlet levels are drawn from a Hidden Markov Model (HMM) in the
E-Step. The experience level transitions depend on the evolution
of the user’s maturing rate, facet preferences, and writing style
over time. The entire process is a supervised generative process
of generating a review based on the experience level of a user
hinged on our HMM-LDA model.
A. Generative Process for a Review
example, a user at a high level of experience may choose to
write on the beer “hoppiness” or “story perplexity” in a movie.
The word that she writes depends on the facet chosen and the
language model for her current experience level. Thus, she
draws a word from the multinomial distribution φetd ,zdi with
a symmetric Dirichlet prior δ. For example, if the facet chosen
is beer taste or movie plot, an experienced user may choose to
use the words “coffee roasted vanilla” and “visceral”, whereas
an inexperienced user may use “bitter” and “emotional” resp.
Algorithm 1 describes this generative process for the review;
Figure 3 depicts it visually in plate notation for graphical
models. We use MCMC sampling for inference on this model.
Consider a corpus with a set D of review documents denoted
by {d1 . . . dD }. For each user, all her documents are ordered
by timestamps t when she wrote them, such that tdi < tdj for
i < j. Each document d has a sequence of Nd words denoted
by d = w1 . . . .wNd . Each word is drawn from a vocabulary
V having unique words indexed by {1 . . . V }. Consider a set
of U users involved in writing the documents in the corpus,
Algorithm 1: Supervised Generative Model for a User’s
where ud is the author of document d. Consider an ordered set
Experience, Facets, and Ratings
of experience levels {e1 , e2 , ...eE } where each ei is from a set
for
each facet z = 1, ...Z and experience level e = 1, ...E do
E, and a set of facets {z1 , z2 , ...zZ } where each zi is from a
choose φe,z ∼ Dirichlet(β)
set Z of possible facets. Each document d is associated with
end
a rating r and an item i.
for each review d = 1, ...D do
At the time td of writing the review d, the user ud has
Given user ud and timestamp td
experience level etd ∈ E. We assume that her experience level
/*Current experience level depends on previous level*/
transitions follow a distribution Π with a Markovian assumption
1. Conditioned on ud and previous experience etd−1 , choose
and certain constraints. This means the experience level of ud
etd ∼ πetd−1
at time td depends on her experience level when writing the
/*User’s facet preferences at current experience level are
previous document at time td−1 .
influenced by supervision via α – scaled by
hyper-parameter ρ controlling influence of supervision*/
πei (ej ) denotes the probability of progressing to experience
2. Conditioned on supervised facet preference αud ,etd of ud
level ej from experience level ei , with the constraint ej ∈
at experience level etd scaled by ρ, choose
{ei , ei + 1}. This means at each instant the user can either stay
θud ,etd ∼ Dirichlet(ρ × αud ,etd )
at her current experience level, or move to the next one.
for each word i = 1, ...Nd do
The experience-level transition probabilities depend on the
/*Facet is drawn from user’s experience-based facet
interests*/
rating behavior, facet preferences, and writing style of the user.
3. Conditioned on ud and etd choose a facet
The progression also takes into account the 1) maturing rate of
zdi ∼ M ultinomial(θud ,etd )
ud modeled by the intensity of her activity in the community,
/*Word is drawn from chosen facet and user’s
and 2) the time gaps between writing consecutive reviews. We
vocabulary at her current experience level*/
incorporate these aspects in a prior for the user’s transition
4. Conditioned on zdi and etd choose a word
wdi ∼ M ultinomial(φetd ,zdi )
rates, γ ud , defined as:
end
D
u
d
γ ud =
+ λ(td − td−1 )
/*Rating computed via Support Vector Regression with
Dud + Davg
chosen facet proportions as input features to learn α*/
Dud and Davg denote the number of reviews written by ud
5. Choose rd ∼ F (hαud ,etd , φetd ,zd i)
and the average number of reviews per user in the community,
end
respectively. Therefore the first term models the user activity
with respect to the community average. The second term
reflects the time difference between successive reviews. The
B. Supervision for Rating Prediction
user experience is unlikely to change from the level when
writing the previous review just a few hours or days ago. λ
The latent item factors φi in Equation 2 correspond to
controls the effect of this time difference, and is set to a very the latent facets Z in Algorithm 1. Assume that we have
small value. Note that if the user writes very infrequently, the some estimation of the latent facet distribution φe,z of each
second term may go up. But the first term which plays the document after one iteration of MCMC sampling, where e
dominating role in this prior will be very small with respect denotes the experience level at which a document is written,
to the community average in an active community, bringing and let z denote a latent facet of the document. We also have
down the influence of the entire prior. Note that the constructed an estimation of the preference of a user u for facet z at
HMM encapsulates all the factors for experience progression experience level e given by θu,e (z).
outlined in Section II.
For each user u, we compute a supervised regression function
At experience level etd , user ud has a Multinomial facet- Fu for the user’s numeric ratings with the – currently estimated
preference distribution θud ,etd . From this distribution she draws – experience-based facet distribution φe,z of her reviews as input
a facet of interest zdi for the ith word in her document. For features and the ratings as output.
e
The learned feature weights hαu,e (z)i indicate the user’s
Let mei−1
denote the number of transitions from experience
i
preference for facet z at experience level e. These feature level ei−1 to ei over all users in the community, with the
weights are used to modify θu,e to attribute more mass to the constraint ei ∈ {ei−1 , ei−1 + 1}. Note that we allow selffacet for which u has a higher preference at level e. This is transitions for staying at the same experience level. The counts
reflected in the next sampling iteration, when we draw a facet z capture the relative difficulty in progressing between different
from the user’s facet preference distribution θu,e smoothed by experience levels. For example, it may be easier to progress
αu,e , and then draw a word from φe,z . This sampling process to level 2 from level 1 than to level 4 from level 3.
is repeated until convergence.
The state transition probability depending on the previous
In any latent facet model, it is difficult to set the hyper- state, factoring in the user-specific activity rate, is given by:
e
m i−1
+I(ei−1 =ei )+γ u
parameters. Therefore, most prior work assume symmetric
i
P (ei |ei−1 , u, e−i ) = meei−1
u
+I(e
i−1 =ei )+Eγ
.
Dirichlet priors with heuristically chosen concentration paramwhere
I(.)
is
an
indicator
function
taking
the
value 1 when
eters. Our approach is to learn the concentration parameter α
the
argument
is
true,
and
0
otherwise.
The
subscript
−i denotes
of a general (i.e., asymmetric) Dirichlet prior for Multinomial
th
the
value
of
a
variable
excluding
the
data
at
the
i
position.
distribution Θ – where we optimize these hyper-parameters to
All
the
counts
of
transitions
exclude
transitions
to
and
from
learn user ratings for documents at a given experience level.
ei , when sampling a value for the current experience level ei
during Gibbs sampling. The conditional distribution for the
C. Inference
experience level transition is given by:
We describe the inference algorithm to estimate the distriP (E|U, Z, W ) ∝ P (E|U ) × P (Z|E, U ) × P (W |Z, E) (4)
butions Θ, Φ and Π from observed data. For each user, we
Here the first factor models the rate of experience progression
factoring in user activity; the second and third factor models
the facet-preferences of user, and language model at a specific
level of experience respectively. All three factors combined
decide whether the user should stay at the current level of
experience, or has matured enough to progress to next level.
In Gibbs sampling, the conditional distribution for each
hidden variable is computed based on the current assignment
of other hidden variables. The values for the latent variables
are sampled repeatedly from this conditional distribution until
convergence. In our problem setting we have two sets of latent
Du Y
du
U Y
E Y
Z N
variables corresponding to E and Z respectively.
Y
Y
P (U, E, Z, W, θ, φ, π; α, δ, γ) =
{
We perform Collapsed Gibbs Sampling [5] in which we first
u=1 e=1 i=1 z=1 j=1
sample
a value for the experience level ei of the user for the
× P (θu,e ; αu,e ) × P (zi,j |θu,ei )
P (πe ; γ u ) × P (ei |πe )
current
document
i, keeping all facet assignments Z fixed. In
{z
}
|
{z
}
|
experience transition distribution user experience facet distribution order to do this, we consider two experience levels ei−1 and
×
P (φe,z ; δ) × P (wi,j |φei ,zi,j )
} ei−1 + 1. For each of these levels, we go through the current
{z
}
|
document and all the token positions to compute Equation 4 —
experience facet language distribution
(3) and choose the level having the highest conditional probability.
Let n(u, e, d, z, v) denote the count of the word w occurring Thereafter, we sample a new facet for each word wi,j of the
in document d written by user u at experience level e belonging document, keeping the currently sampled experience level of
to facet z. In the following equation, (.) at any position in a the user for the document fixed.
The conditional distributions for Gibbs sampling for the joint
distribution indicates summation of the above counts for the
update of the latent variables E and Z are given by:
respective argument.
compute the conditional distribution over the set of hidden
variables E and Z for all the words W in a review. The exact
computation of this distribution is intractable. We use Collapsed
Gibbs Sampling [5] to estimate the conditional distribution for
each hidden variable, which is computed over the current
assignment for all other hidden variables, and integrating out
other parameters of the model.
Let U, E, Z and W be the set of all users, experience levels,
facets and words in the corpus. In the following, i indexes a
document and j indexes a word in it.
The joint probability distribution is given by:
Exploiting conjugacy of the Multinomial and Dirichlet
ui = u, {zi,j = zj }, {wi,j = wj }, e−i ) ∝
distributions, we can integrate out Φ from the above distribution E-Step 1: P (ei = e|ei−1 ,Y
P (ei |u, ei−1 , e−i ) ×
P (zj |ei , u, e−i ) × P (wj |zj , ei , e−i ) ∝
to obtain the posterior distribution P (Z|U, E; α) of the latent
j
variable Z given by:
e
U Y
E
Y
u=1 e=1
P
Q
Γ( z αu,e,z ) z Γ(n(u, e, ., z, .) + αu,e,z )
P
P
Q
z αu,e,z )
z Γ(αu,e,z )Γ( z n(u, e, ., z, .) +
where Γ denotes the Gamma function.
Similarly, by integrating out Θ, P (W |E, Z; δ) is given by
E Y
Z
Y
e=1 z=1
P
Q
Γ( v δv ) v Γ(n(., e, ., z, v) + δv )
Q
P
P
v Γ(δv )Γ( v n(., e, ., z, v) +
v δv )
Y
P
j
zj
mei−1
+ I(ei−1 = ei ) + γ u
i
×
ei−1
m.
+ I(ei−1 = ei ) + Eγ u
n(u, e, ., zj , .) + αu,e,zj
n(., e, ., zj , wj ) + δ
P
×P
n(u, e, ., zj , .) + zj αu,e,zj
wj n(., e, ., zj , wj ) + V δ
E-Step 2:
P (zj = z|ud = u, ed = e, wj = w, z−j ) ∝
n(u, e, ., z, .) + αu,e,z
n(., e, ., z, w) + δ
P
P
×P
n(u,
e,
.,
z,
.)
+
α
z
z u,e,z
w n(., e, ., z, w) + V δ
(5)
The proportion of the z th facet in document d with words
{wj } written at experience level e is given by:
PNd
j=1 φe,z (wj )
φe,z (d) =
Nd
For each user u, we learn a regression model Fu using these
facet proportions in each document as features, along with the
user and item biases (refer to Equation 2), with the user’s item
rating rd as the response variable. Besides the facet distribution
of each document, the biases < βg (e), βu (e), βi (e) > also
depend on the experience level e.
We formulate the function Fu as Support Vector Regression [4], which forms the M -Step in our problem:
1
M-Step: min αu,e T αu,e + C×
αu,e 2
Du
X
(max(0, |rd − αu,e T < βg (e),βu (e), βi (e), φe,z (d) > | − ))2
d=1
The total number of parameters learned is [E×Z+E×3]×U .
Our solution may generate a mix of positive and negative real
numbered weights. In order to ensure that the concentration
parameters of the Dirichlet distribution are positive reals, we
take exp(αu,e ). The learned α’s are typically very small,
whereas the value of n(u, e, ., z, .) in Equation 5 is very large.
Therefore we scale the α’s by a hyper-parameter ρ to control
the influence of supervision. ρ is tuned using a validation set
by varying it from {100 , 101 ...105 }. In the E-Step of the next
iteration, we choose θu,e ∼ Dirichlet(ρ × αu,e ). We use the
LibLinear2 package for Support Vector Regression.
V. E XPERIMENTS
Setup: We perform experiments with data from five communities in different domains: BeerAdvocate (beeradvocate.com)
and RateBeer (ratebeer.com) for beer reviews, Amazon
(amazon.com) for movie reviews, Yelp (yelp.com) for food
and restaurant reviews, and NewsTrust (newstrust.net)
for reviews of news media. Table III gives the dataset
statistics3 . We have a total of 12.7 million reviews from 0.9
million users from all of the five communities combined. The
first four communities are used for product reviews, from
where we extract the following quintuple for our model <
userId, itemId, timestamp, rating, review >. NewsTrust is
a special community, which we discuss in Section VI.
For all models, we used the three most recent reviews of
each user as withheld test data. All experience-based models
consider the last experience level reached by each user, and
corresponding learned parameters for rating prediction. In all
the models, we group light users with less than 50 reviews
in training data into a background model, treated as a single
user, to avoid modeling from sparse observations. We do not
ignore any user. During the test phase for a light user, we take
her parameters from the background model. We set Z = 20
for BeerAdvocate, RateBeer and Yelp facets; and Z = 100
for Amazon movies and NewsTrust which have much richer
2 http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/
cjlin/liblinear
http://www.yelp.com/dataset challenge/
3 http://snap.stanford.edu/data/,
Dataset
#Users
#Items
#Ratings
Beer (BeerAdvocate)
Beer (RateBeer)
Movies (Amazon)
Food (Yelp)
Media (NewsTrust)
33,387
40,213
759,899
45,981
6,180
66,051
110,419
267,320
11,537
62,108
1,586,259
2,924,127
7,911,684
229,907
134,407
TOTAL
885,660
517,435
12,786,384
TABLE III: Dataset statistics.
Models
Beer
Rate
Advocate Beer
News
Trust
AmazonYelp
Our model
(most recent experience level)
f) Our model
(past experience level)
e) User at learned rate
c) Community at learned rate
b) Community at uniform rate
d) User at uniform rate
a) Latent factor model
0.363
0.309
0.373
1.174
1.469
0.375
0.362
0.470
1.200
1.642
0.379
0.383
0.391
0.394
0.409
0.336
0.334
0.347
0.349
0.377
0.575
0.656
0.767
0.744
0.847
1.293
1.203
1.203
1.206
1.248
1.732
1.534
1.526
1.613
1.560
TABLE IV: MSE comparison of our model versus baselines.
latent dimensions. For experience levels, we set E = 5 for
all. However, for NewsTrust and Yelp datasets our model
categorizes users to belong to one of three experience levels.
A. Quantitative Comparison
Baselines: We consider the following baselines for our work,
and use the available code4 for experimentation.
a) LFM: A standard latent factor recommendation model [9].
b) Community at uniform rate: Users and products in a community evolve using a single “global clock” [10][27][26],
where the different stages of the community evolution
appear at uniform time intervals. So the community prefers
different products at different times.
c) Community at learned rate: This extends (b) by learning the
rate at which the community evolves with time, eliminating
the uniform rate assumption.
d) User at uniform rate: This extends (b) to consider individual users, by modeling the different stages of a user’s
progression based on preferences and experience levels
evolving over time. The model assumes a uniform rate for
experience progression.
4 http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/
jmcauley/code/
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
BeerAdvocate
RateBeer
NewsTrust
User at learned rate
Community at learned rate
User at uniform rate
Latent factor model
Amazon
Yelp
Community at uniform rate
Fig. 4: MSE improvement (%) of our model over baselines.
Experience Level 1: drank, bad, maybe, terrible, dull, shit
e) User at learned rate: This extends (d) by allowing each
user to evolve on a “personal clock”, so that the time to
Experience Level 2: bottle, sweet, nice hops, bitter, strong
light, head, smooth, good, brew, better, good
reach certain experience levels depends on the user [16].
f) Our model with past experience level: In order to determine
Expertise Level 3: sweet alcohol, palate down, thin glass,
malts, poured thick, pleasant hint, bitterness, copper hard
how well our model captures evolution of user experience
over time, we consider another baseline where we randomly
Experience Level 4: smells sweet, thin bitter, fresh hint, honey
end, sticky yellow, slight bit good, faint bitter beer, red brown,
sample the experience level reached by users at some timepoint
good malty, deep smooth bubbly, damn weak
previously in their lifecycle, who may have evolved thereafter.
We learn our model parameters from the data up to this time,
Experience Level 5: golden head lacing, floral dark fruits,
citrus sweet, light spice, hops, caramel finish, acquired taste,
and again predict the user’s most recent three item ratings. Note
hazy body, lacing chocolate, coffee roasted vanilla, creamy
that this baseline considers textual content of user contributed
bitterness, copper malts, spicy honey
reviews, unlike other baselines that ignore them. Therefore it
is better than vanilla content-based methods, with the notion TABLE V: Experience-based facet words for the illustrative
of past evolution, and is the strongest baseline for our model. beer facet taste.
Discussions: Table IV compares the mean squared error (MSE)
0.6
for rating predictions, generated by our model versus the six
baselines. Our model consistently outperforms all baselines,
0.5
reducing the MSE by ca. 5 to 35%. Improvements of our model
0.4
over baselines are statistically significant at p-value < 0.0001.
0.3
Our performance improvement is most prominent for the
0.2
NewsTrust community, which exhibits strong language features,
and topic polarities in reviews. The lowest improvement (over
0.1
the best performing baseline in any dataset) is achieved
0
RateBeer BeeeAdvocate NewsTrust
Amazon
Yelp
for Amazon movie reviews. A possible reason is that the
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
community is very diverse with a very wide range of movies
and that review texts heavily mix statements about movie plots Fig. 5: Proportion of reviews at each experience level of users.
with the actual review aspects like praising or criticizing certain
facets of a movie. The situation is similar for the food and movies (e.g., by genre or production studios) that may better
restaurants case. Nevertheless, our model always wins over the distinguish experienced users from amateurs or novices in
best baseline from other works, which is typically the “user at terms of their refined taste and writing style.
MSE for different experience levels: We observe a weak trend
learned rate” model.
Evolution effects: We observe in Table IV that our model’s that the MSE decreases with increasing experience level. Users
predictions degrade when applied to the users’ past experience at the highest level of experience almost always exhibit the
level, compared to their most recent level. This signals that lowest MSE. So we tend to better predict the rating behavior for
the model captures user evolution past the previous timepoint. the most mature users than for the remaining user population.
Therefore the last (i.e., most recent) experience level attained by This in turn enables generating better recommendations for the
a user is most informative for generating new recommendations. “connoisseurs” in the community.
Experience progression: Figure 5 shows the proportion of
B. Qualitative Analysis
reviews written by community members at different experience
Salient words for facets and experience levels: We point levels right before advancing to the next level. Here we plot
out typical word clusters, with illustrative labels, to show the users with a minimum of 50 reviews, so they are certainly not
variation of language for users of different experience levels “amateurs”. A large part of the community progresses from
and different facets. Tables II and V show salient words to level 1 to level 2. However, from here only few users move
describe the beer facet taste and movie facets plot and narrative to higher levels, leading to a skewed distribution. We observe
style, respectively – at different experience levels. Note that the that the majority of the population stays at level 2.
facets being latent, their labels are merely our interpretation. User experience distribution: Table VI shows the number
of users per experience level in each domain, for users with
Other similar examples can be found in Tables I and VII.
BeerAdvocate and RateBeer are very focused communities; > 50 reviews. The distribution also follows our intuition of
so it is easier for our model to characterize the user experience a highly skewed distribution. Note that almost all users with
evolution by vocabulary and writing style in user reviews. We < 50 reviews belong to levels 1 or 2.
observe in Table V that users write more descriptive and fruity Language model and facet preference divergence: Figure 6b
words to depict the beer taste as they become more experienced. and 6c show the KL divergence for facet-preference and
For movies, the wording in reviews is much more diverse language models of users at different experience levels, as
and harder to track. Especially for blockbuster movies, which computed by our model. The facet-preference divergence
tend to dominate this data, the reviews mix all kinds of aspects. increases with the gap between experience levels, but not as
A better approach here could be to focus on specific kinds of smooth and prominent as for the language models. On one hand,
Datasets
e=1
e=2
e=3
e=4
e=5
Models
F1
N DCG
BeerAdvocate
RateBeer
NewsTrust
Amazon
Yelp
0.05
0.03
-
0.59
0.42
0.72
-
0.19
0.35
0.15
0.13
0.30
0.10
0.18
0.60
0.10
0.68
0.07
0.02
0.25
0.05
0.02
User at learned rate [16]
Our model
0.68
0.75
0.90
0.97
TABLE VI: Distribution of users at different experience levels.
Level 1: bad god religion iraq responsibility
Level 2: national reform live krugman questions clear jon led
meaningful lives california powerful safety impacts
Level 3: health actions cuts medicare nov news points oil
climate major jobs house high vote congressional spending
unemployment strong taxes citizens events failure
TABLE VII: Salient words for the illustrative NewsTrust topic
US Election at different experience levels.
this is due to the complexity of latent facets vs. explicit words.
On the other hand, this also affirms our notion of grounding
the model on language.
Baseline model divergence: Figure 6a shows the facetpreference divergence of users at different experience levels
computed by the baseline model “user at learned rate” [16]. The
contrast between the heatmaps of our model and the baseline
is revealing. The increase in divergence with increasing gap
between experience levels is very rough in the baseline model,
although the trend is obvious.
TABLE VIII: Performance on identifying experienced users.
based on community engagement, time in the community, other
users’ feedback on reviews, profile transparency, and manual
validation. We use these member levels to categorize users as
experienced or inexperienced. This is treated as the ground
truth for assessing the prediction and ranking quality of our
model and the baseline “user at learned rate” model [16].
Table VIII shows the F1 scores of these two competitors. We
also computed the Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain
(NDCG) [8] for the ranked lists of users generated by the
two models. NDCG gives geometrically decreasing weights
to predictions at various positions of ranked list: N DCGp =
DCGp
IDCGp
where DCGp = rel1 +
Pp
reli
i=2 log2 i
Here, reli is the relevance (0 or 1) of a result at position i.
As Table VIII shows, our model clearly outperforms the
baseline model on both F1 and N DCG.
VII. R ELATED W ORK
State-of-the-art recommenders based on collaborative filtering [9][11] exploit user-user and item-item similarities by latent
factors. Explicit user-user interactions have been exploited in
trust-aware recommendation systems [6][25]. The temporal
VI. U SE -C ASE S TUDY
aspects leading to bursts in item popularity, bias in ratings, or
So far we have focused on traditional item recommendation the evolution of the entire community as a whole is studied
for items like beers or movies. Now we switch to a different in [10][27][26]. Other papers have studied temporal issues
kind of items - newspapers and news articles - tapping into the for anomaly detection [7], detecting changes in the social
NewsTrust online community (newstrust.net). NewsTrust neighborhood [14] and linguistic norms [3]. However, none of
features news stories posted and reviewed by members, many these prior work has considered the evolving experience and
of whom are professional journalists and content experts. behavior of individual users.
The recent work[16], which is one of our baselines, modeled
Stories are reviewed based on their objectivity, rationality, and
the
influence of rating behavior on evolving user experience.
general quality of language to present an unbiased and balanced
However,
it ignores the vocabulary and writing style of users in
narrative of an event. The focus is on quality journalism.
reviews,
and
their natural smooth temporal progression. In conIn our framework, each story is an item, which is rated
trast,
our
work
considers the review texts for additional insight
and reviewed by a user. The facets are the underlying topic
into
facet
preferences
and smooth experience progression.
distribution of reviews, with topics being Healthcare, Obama
Prior work that tapped user review texts focused on other
Administration, NSA, etc. The facet preferences can be mapped
issues. Sentiment analysis over reviews aimed to learn latent
to the (political) polarity of users in the news community.
Recommending News Articles: Our first objective is to topics [13], latent aspects and their ratings [12][24], and userrecommend news to readers catering to their facet preferences, user interactions [25]. [15][23] unified various approaches
viewpoints, and experience. We apply our joint model to this to generate user-specific ratings of reviews. [18] further
task, and compare the predicted ratings with the ones observed leveraged the author writing style. However, all of these
for withheld reviews in the NewsTrust community. The mean prior approaches operate in a static, snapshot-oriented manner,
squared error (MSE) results are reported in Table IV in without considering time at all.
Section V. Table VII shows salient examples of the vocabulary
From the modeling perspective, some approaches learn a
by users at different experience levels on the topic US Election. document-specific discrete rating [13][21], whereas others
Identifying Experienced Users: Our second task is to find learn the facet weights outside the topic model (e.g., [12],
experienced members of this community, who have potential [15], [18]). In order to incorporate continuous ratings, [1]
for being citizen journalists. In order to find how good our proposed a complex and computationally expensive Variational
model predicts the experience level of users, we consider the Inference algorithm, and [17] developed a simpler approach
following as ground-truth for user experience. In NewsTrust, using Multinomial-Dirichlet Regression. The latter inspired our
users have Member Levels calculated by the NewsTrust staff technique for incorporating supervision.
E3
E4
E5
138
123
93
18
135
105
E2
E3
134
0
33
8
65
90
75
112
34
0
21
43
60
E4
89
8
18
0
30
45
30
E5
19
63
48
31
0
E1
120
15
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
0
180
71
140
125
E2
38
0
175
47
150
175
125
E3
83
149
5
0
88
100
75
E4
E5
86
155
1
E2
E3
0
180
48
203
100
140
180
150
259
E2
0
73
120
90
60
65
83
0
30
E3
160
2217
E2
181
0
1910
E3
601
309
0
1750
1500
1250
1000
750
500
0
Experience Levels
25
0
E2
0
2000
210
50
116
E1
E1
240
E3
86
0
E1
175
E1
0
Experience Levels
200
Experience Levels
E2
0
Experience Levels
E1
Experience Levels
Experience Levels
E1
250
0
Experience Levels
0
Experience Levels
(a) User at learned rate [16]: Facet preference divergence with experience.
E3
E4
E5
0
104
76
141
114
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
0
192
199
324
161
135
E2
120
105
98
0
78
77
91
90
E3
75
78
0
89
106
75
60
E4
320
E1
132
74
90
0
52
45
109
86
106
52
0
E2
200
0
20
267
167
E3
211
20
0
271
244
160
120
E4
332
284
296
0
129
80
E5
15
240
200
163
0
Experience Levels
E2
E3
0
216
234
E1
E2
E3
0
19
34
225
E1
30
E5
E1
54
280
Experience Levels
Experience Levels
E1
66
45
23
0
200
E1
175
Experience Levels
E2
Experience Levels
E1
150
E2
204
0
162
125
100
75
E3
156
222
50
0
42
36
E2
20
0
57
18
E3
55
34
0
12
6
0
Experience Levels
30
24
25
40
48
0
Experience Levels
0
Experience Levels
(b) Our model: Facet preference divergence with experience.
E3
E4
E5
0
193
209
154
201
200
E1
E1
E2
E3
E4
E5
0
571
563
1242
1440
197
0
71
100
162
150
125
E3
E4
213
71
0
77
140
100
75
156
98
76
0
102
50
E5
203
161
138
102
Experience Levels
0
25
0
RateBeer
Experience Levels
Experience Levels
E2
1350
E2
575
0
78
303
390
1050
900
E3
593
105
0
333
362
750
600
E4
1264
326
329
0
213
E1
E2
E3
0
72
96
450
E1
1441
393
339
194
Experience Levels
Amazon Movies
0
E2
E3
0
32
210
200
70
60
E2
72
0
50
76
40
30
E3
96
76
150
E1
80
20
0
0
Experience Levels
175
150
125
E2
33
0
132
E3
209
132
0
100
75
50
10
300
E5
E1
90
1200
175
Experience Levels
E2
Experience Levels
E1
E1
Experience Levels
25
0
0
Yelp
NewsTrust
(c) Our model: Language model divergence with experience.
Fig. 6: Facet preference and language model KL divergence with experience.
A general (continuous) version of this work is presented
in [19] with fine-grained temporal evolution of user experience,
and resulting language model using Geometric Brownian
Motion and Brownian Motion, respectively.
VIII. C ONCLUSION
Current recommender systems do not consider user experience when generating recommendations. In this paper, we have
proposed an experience-aware recommendation model that can
adapt to the changing preferences and maturity of users in
a community. We model the personal evolution of a user in
rating items that she will appreciate at her current maturity
level. We exploit the coupling between the facet preferences
of a user, her experience, writing style in reviews, and rating
behavior to capture the user’s temporal evolution. Our model is
the first work that considers the progression of user experience
as expressed in the text of item reviews.
Our experiments – with data from domains like beer, movies,
food, and news – demonstrate that our model substantially
reduces the mean squared error for predicted ratings, compared
to the state-of-the-art baselines. This shows our method can
generate better recommendations than those models. We further
demonstrate the utility of our method in a use-case study about
identifying experienced members in the NewsTrust community
who can be potential citizen journalists.
R EFERENCES
[1] D. M. Blei and J. D. McAuliffe. Supervised topic models. NIPS, 2007.
[2] D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. Latent dirichlet allocation. J.
Mach. Learn. Res., 3, 2003.
[3] C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, R. West, D. Jurafsky, J. Leskovec, and
C. Potts. No country for old members: User lifecycle and linguistic
change in online communities. WWW, 2013.
[4] H. Drucker, C. J. C. Burges, L. Kaufman, A. Smola, and V. Vapnik.
Support vector regression machines. NIPS, 1997.
[5] T. Griffiths. Gibbs sampling in the generative model of latent dirichlet
allocation. Technical report, 2002.
[6] R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust
and distrust. WWW, 2004.
[7] S. Günnemann, N. Günnemann, and C. Faloutsos. Detecting anomalies
in dynamic rating data: A robust probabilistic model for rating evolution.
KDD, 2014.
[8] K. Järvelin and J. Kekäläinen. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR
techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 20(4), 2002.
[9] Y. Koren. Factorization meets the neighborhood: A multifaceted
collaborative filtering model. KDD, 2008.
[10] Y. Koren. Collaborative filtering with temporal dynamics. Commun.
ACM, 53(4), 2010.
[11] Y. Koren and R. Bell. Advances in collaborative filtering. In
Recommender systems handbook. 2011.
[12] H. Lakkaraju, C. Bhattacharyya, I. Bhattacharya, and S. Merugu.
Exploiting coherence for the simultaneous discovery of latent facets
and associated sentiments. SDM, 2011.
[13] C. Lin and Y. He. Joint sentiment/topic model for sentiment analysis.
CIKM, 2009.
[14] H. Ma, D. Zhou, C. Liu, M. R. Lyu, and I. King. Recommender systems
with social regularization. WSDM, 2011.
[15] J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. Hidden factors and hidden topics:
Understanding rating dimensions with review text. RecSys, 2013.
[16] J. J. McAuley and J. Leskovec. From amateurs to connoisseurs: modeling
the evolution of user expertise through online reviews. WWW, 2013.
[17] D. Mimno and A. McCallum. Topic models conditioned on arbitrary
features with dirichlet-multinomial regression. UAI, 2008.
[18] S. Mukherjee, G. Basu, and S. Joshi. Joint author sentiment topic model.
SDM, 2014.
[19] S. Mukherjee, S. Günnemann, and G. Weikum. Continuous experienceaware language model. SIGKDD, 2016.
[20] S. Mukherjee, H. Lamba, and G. Weikum. Experience-aware item
recommendation in evolving review communities. ICDM, 2015.
[21] D. Ramage, C. D. Manning, and S. Dumais. Partially labeled topic
models for interpretable text mining. KDD, 2011.
[22] M. Rosen-Zvi, T. Griffiths, M. Steyvers, and P. Smyth. The author-topic
model for authors and documents. UAI, 2004.
[23] C. Wang and D. M. Blei. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending
scientific articles. KDD, 2011.
[24] H. Wang et al. Latent aspect rating analysis without aspect keyword
supervision. KDD, 2011.
[25] R. West, H. S. Paskov, J. Leskovec, and C. Potts. Exploiting social
network structure for person-to-person sentiment analysis. Transactions
of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2(2):297–310, 2014.
[26] L. Xiang, Q. Yuan, S. Zhao, L. Chen, X. Zhang, Q. Yang, and J. Sun.
Temporal recommendation on graphs via long- and short-term preference
fusion. KDD, 2010.
[27] L. Xiong, X. Chen, T. K. Huang, J. Schneider, and J. G. Carbonell.
Temporal collaborative filtering with bayesian probabilistic tensor factorization. SDM, 2010.
| 2cs.AI
|
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
arXiv:1501.04725v1 [cs.PL] 20 Jan 2015
New York University, USA
Abstract. The problem of inferring an inductive invariant for verifying program
safety can be formulated in terms of binary classification. This is a standard problem in machine learning: given a sample of good and bad points, one is asked to
find a classifier that generalizes from the sample and separates the two sets. Here,
the good points are the reachable states of the program, and the bad points are
those that reach a safety property violation. Thus, a learned classifier is a candidate invariant. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm that uses decision trees
to learn candidate invariants in the form of arbitrary Boolean combinations of
numerical inequalities. We have used our algorithm to verify C programs taken
from the literature. The algorithm is able to infer safe invariants for a range of
challenging benchmarks and compares favorably to other ML-based invariant inference techniques. In particular, it scales well to large sample sets.
1
Introduction
Finding inductive invariants is a fundamental problem in program verification. Many
static analysis techniques have been proposed to infer invariants automatically. However, it is often difficult to scale those techniques to large programs without compromising on precision at the risk of introducing false alarms. Some techniques, such as
abstract interpretation [9], are effective at striking a good balance between scalability
and precision by allowing the analysis to be fine-tuned for a specific class of programs
and properties. This fine-tuning requires careful engineering of the analysis [11]. Instead of manually adapting the analysis to work well across many similar programs,
refinement-based techniques adapt the analysis automatically to the given program and
property at hand [8]. A promising approach to achieve this automatic adaptation is to
exploit synergies between static analysis and testing [15,17,34]. Particularly interesting
is the use of Machine Learning (ML) to infer likely invariants from test data [14,31,32].
In this paper, we present a new algorithm of this type that learns arbitrary Boolean combinations of numerical inequalities.
In most ML problems, one is given a small number of sample points labeled by an
unknown function. The task is then to learn a classifier that performs well on unseen
points, and is thus a good approximation to the underlying function. Binary classification is a specific instance of this problem. Here, the sample data is partitioned into good
and bad points and the goal is to learn a predicate that separates the two sets. Invariant
inference can be viewed as a binary classification problem [31]. If the purpose of the
invariant is to prove a safety property, then the good points are the forward-reachable
safe states of the program and the bad points are the backward-reachable unsafe states.
These two sets are sampled using program testing. The learned classifier then represents
2
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
a candidate invariant, which is proved safe using a static analysis or theorem prover. If
the classifier is not a safe invariant, the failed proof yields a spurious counterexample
trace and, in turn, new test data to improve the classifier in a refinement loop.
Our new algorithm is an instance of this ML-based refinement scheme, where candidate invariants are inferred using a decision tree learner. In this context, a decision tree
(DT) is a binary tree in which each inner node is labeled by a function f from points to
reals, called a feature, and a real-valued threshold t. Each leaf of the tree is labeled with
either “good” or “bad”. Such a tree encodes a predicate on points that takes the form
of a Boolean combination of inequalities, f pxq ď t, between features and thresholds.
Given sets of features and sample points, a DT learner computes a DT that is consistent
with the samples. In our algorithm, we project the program states onto the numerical
program variables yielding points in a d-dimensional space. The features describe distances from hyperplanes in this space. The DT learner thus infers candidate invariants
in the form of arbitrary finite unions of polyhedra. However, the approach also easily
generalizes to features that describe nonlinear functions. Our theoretical contribution
is a probabilistic completeness guarantee. More precisely, using the Probably Approximately Correct model for learning [33], we provide a bound on the sample size that
ensures that our algorithm successfully learns a safe inductive invariant with a given
probability.
We have implemented our algorithm for specific classes of features that we automatically derive from the input program. In particular, inspired by the octagon abstract
domain [22], we use as features the set of all hyperplane slopes of the form ˘xi ˘ xj ,
where 1 ď i ă j ď d. We compared our implementation to other invariant generation tools on benchmarks taken from the literature. Our evaluation indicates that our
approach works well for a range of benchmarks that are challenging for other tools.
Moreover, we observed that DT learners often produce simpler invariants and scale
better to large sample sets compared to other ML-based invariant inference techniques
such as [14, 30–32].
2
Overview
In this section, we discuss an illustrative example and walk through the steps taken in
our algorithm to compute invariants. To this end, consider the program in Fig. 1. Our
goal is to find an inductive invariant for the loop on line 4 that is sufficiently strong to
prove that the assertion x ‰ 0 on line 12 is always satisfied.
Good and Bad States. We restrict ourselves to programs over integer variables x “
px1 , . . . , xd q without procedures. Then a state is a point in Zd that corresponds to some
assignment to each of the variables. For simplicity, we assume that our example program has a single control location corresponding to the head of the loop. That is, its
states are pairs pv1 , v2 q where v1 is the value of x and v2 the value of y. When our
program begins execution, the initial state could be p0, 1q or p0, ´3q, but it cannot be
p2, 3q or p0, 0q because of the precondition specified by the assume statement in the
program. A good state is defined as any state that the program could conceivably reach
when it is started from a state consistent with the precondition. If we start execution at
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
1
2
var x, y: Int ;
assume x “ 0 ^ y ‰ 0;
3
4
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
while (y ‰ 0) {
if (y ă 0) {
x := x ´ 1; y := y + 1;
} else {
x := x + 1; y := y ´ 1;
}
}
2
y
4
0
2
4
11
12
assert x ‰ 0;
4
2
0
x
2
4
Fig. 1: Example program. The right side shows some of the good and bad states of the
program, in blue and red respectively
p0, ´3q, then the states we reach are tp´1, ´2q, p´2, ´1q, p´3, 0qu and thus these are
all good states.
Similarly, bad states are defined to be the states such that if the program execution
was to be started at that point (if we ran the program from the loop head, with those
values) then the loop will exit after a finite point and the assertion will fail. For example,
p0, 0q is a bad state, as the loop will not run, and we directly go to the assertion and fail
it. Similarly, p´2, ´2q is a bad state, as after one iteration of the loop the state becomes
p´1, ´1q, and after another iteration we reach p0, 0q, which fails the assertion.
The right-hand side of Fig. 1 shows some of the good and bad states of the program.
A safe inductive invariant can be expressed in terms of a disjunction of the indicated
hyperplanes, which separate the good from the bad states. Our algorithm automatically
finds such an invariant.
Overview. The high-level overview of our approach is as follows: good and bad states
are sampled by running the program on different initial states. Next, a numeric abstract
domain that is likely to contain the invariant is chosen manually. We use disjunctions of
octagons by default. For each hyperplane (up to translation) in the domain we add a new
“feature” to each of the sample points corresponding to the distance to that hyperplane.
A Decision Tree (DT) learning algorithm is then used to learn a DT that can separate
the good and bad states in the sample, and this tree is converted into a formula that is a
candidate invariant. Finally, this candidate invariant is passed to a theorem prover that
verifies the correctness of the invariant. We now discuss these steps in detail.
Sampling. The first step in our algorithm is to sample good and bad states of this program. We sample the good states by picking states satisfying the precondition, running
the program from these states and collecting all states reached. To sample bad states,
we look at all points close to good states, run the program from these. If the loop exits
within a bounded number of iterations and fails the assert, we mark all states reached
as bad states. The sampled good and bad states are shown in Fig. 1.
4
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
Features. The next step is to choose a candidate hyperplane set for the inequalities in
the invariant. For most of our benchmarks, we used the octagon abstract domain, which
consists of all linear inequalities of the form:
bi ¨ xi ` bj ¨ xj ď c where 1 ď i ă j ď d, bi , bj P t´1, 0, 1u, and c P Z.
We then let H “ tw1 , w2 , . . . u be the set of hyperplane slopes for this domain. Then
we transform our sample points (both good and bad) according to these slopes. For each
sample point x, we get a new point z given by zi “ x ¨ wi . In our example, the octagon
slopes H and some of our transformed good and bad points are
fi
»
fi
»
0
»
fi
1 0
—0 1ffi
,
H“–
1 ´1fl
1 1
and
0
1
1 ´1
1
— 1 0 1 1ffi
— 1 0ffi
ffi
—
—´1 0ffi
ffi „
—
—´1 0 ´1 ´1ffi
ffi
—
ffi
—
...
. . . ffi 1 0 1 1
ffi
—
X ¨ HT “ —
— 0 0ffi ¨ 0 1 ´1 1 “ — 0 0 0 0ffi .
ffi
—
ffi
—
— 2 ´2 4 0ffi
— 2 ´2ffi
fl
–
fl
–
´1 1
...
´1
1 ´2
...
0
Learning the DT. After this transformation, we run a Decision Tree learning algorithm
on the processed data. A DT (see Fig. 2 for an example) is a concise way to represent
a set of rules as a binary tree. Each inner node is labeled by a feature and a threshold.
Given a sample point and its features, we evaluate the DT by starting at the root and
taking the path given by the rules: if the features is less than or equal to the threshold,
we go to the left child, otherwise the right. Leaves specify the output label on that point.
Most DT learning algorithms start at an empty tree, and greedily pick the best feature to
split on at each node. From the good and bad states listed above, we can easily see that
a good feature to split on must be the last one, as all bad states have the last column 0.
Indeed, the first split made by the DT is to split on z4 at ´0.5. Since w4 “ p1, 1q, this
split corresponds to the linear inequality x ` y ď ´0.5. Now, half the good states are
represented in the left child of the root (corresponding to z4 ď ´0.5). The right child
contains all the bad states and the other half of the good states. So the algorithm leaves
the left child as is and tries to find the best split for the right child. Again, we see the
same pattern with z4 , and so the algorithm picks the split z4 ă 1. Now, all bad states
fall into the left child, and all good states fall into the right child, and we are done. The
computed DT is shown in Fig. 2.
Finally, we need to convert the DT back into a formula. To do this, we can follow all
paths from the root that lead to good leaves, and take the conjunction of all inequalities
on the path, and finally take the disjunction of all such paths. In our example, we get
the candidate invariant:
px ` y ď ´0.5q _ px ` y ą ´0.5 ^ x ` y ą 0.5q .
This can be simplified to px ` y ‰ 0q.
Verifying the Candidate Invariant. Our program is then annotated with this invariant
and passed to a theorem prover to verify that the invariant is indeed sufficient to prove
the program correct.
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
5
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
Good
TRUE
TRUE
Good
Good
Good
Good
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
TRUE
TRUE
TRUE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
FALSE
Bad
TRUE
Bad
Bad
Bad
Bad
Bad
Good
Good
FALSE
FALSE
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Fig. 2: Decision tree learned from the program and sample data in Fig. 1
3
Preliminaries
Problem Statement. We think of programs as transition systems P “ pS, R, init, safeq,
where S is a set of states, R Ď S ˆ S is a transition relation on the states, init Ď S is
a set of initial states, and safe Ď S is the set of safe states that we want our program to
remain within.
For any set of states X, the set postpXq represents all the successor states with
respect to R. More formally,
postpXq “ t x1 | Dx P X. Rpx, x1 q u .
Then, we can define the set of reachable states of the program (the good states) to be
the least fixed point,
good “ lfppλX. init Y postpXqq .
Similarly, we can define
prepXq “ t x | Dx1 P X. Rpx, x1 q u and
bad “ lfppλX. error Y prepXqq,
where error is the complement of safe. Then we see that the program is correct, with
respect to the safety property given by safe, if good X bad “ H. Thus, our task is to
separate the good states from the bad states.
One method to show that these sets are disjoint is to show the existence of a safe
inductive invariant. A safe inductive invariant is a set inv that satisfies the following
three properties:
– init Ď inv,
– postpinvq Ď inv,
– inv Ď safe.
It is easy to see that these conditions imply, in particular, that inv separates the good
and bad states: good Ď inv and inv X bad “ H.
6
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
Invariant Generation as Binary Classification. The set up for most machine learning
problems is as follows. We have an input space X and an output space Y, and one is
given a set of samples X Ď X that are labeled by some unknown function f : X Ñ Y.
We fix a hypothesis set H Ď Y X , and the aim is to find the hypothesis h P H that most
closely approximates f . The samples are often given in terms of feature vectors, and
thus a sample x can be thought of as a point in some d-dimensional space.
Binary classification is a common instance of this problem, where the labels are
restricted to a binary set Y “ t0, 1u. Following [31], we view the problem of computing
a safe inductive invariant for a program P “ pS, R, init, safeq as a binary classification
problem by defining the input space as the set of all program states X “ S. Sample
states x P bad are labeled by 0 and x P good are labeled by 1. Thus, the unknown
function f is the characteristic function of the set of good states. The hypothesis to be
learned is a safe inductive invariant. Note that if sampling the program shows that some
state x is both good and bad, there exists no safe inductive invariant, and the program
is shown to be unsafe. Hence, we assume that the set of sample states can be partitioned
into good and bad states.
Decision Trees. Instead of considering a hypothesis space that can represent arbitrary
invariants, we restrict it to a specific abstract domain, namely those invariants that can
be represented using decision trees. A Decision Tree (DT) [23] is a binary tree that
represents a Boolean function. Each inner node v of T is labeled by a decision of the
form xi ď t, where xi is one of the input features and t is a real valued threshold.
We denote this inequality by v.cond. We denote the left and right children of an inner
node by v.left and v.right respectively. Each leaf v is labeled by an output v.label. To
evaluate an input, we trace a path down from the root node T.root of the tree, going
left at each inner node if the decision is true, and right otherwise. The output of the
tree on this input is the label of the leaf reached by this process. The hypothesis set
corresponding to all DTs is thus arbitrary Boolean combinations of linear inequalities
of the form xi ď t (axis-aligned hyperplanes).
As one can easily see, many DTs can represent the same underlying function. However, the task of finding the smallest (in terms of number of nodes) DT for a particular
function can be shown to be NP-complete [19]. Standard algorithms to learn DTs work
by greedily selecting at each node the co-ordinate and threshold that separates the remaining training data best [7,27]. This procedure is followed recursively until all leaves
have samples labeled by a single class.
The criterion for separation is normally a measure such as conditional entropy. Entropy is a commonly used measure of uncertainty in a system. It is a function that is
low when the system is homogeneous (in this case, think of when all samples reaching a node have the same label), and high otherwise. Conditional entropy, analogously,
measures how homogeneous the samples are after choosing a particular co-ordinate and
threshold. More formally, at each node, we look at the samples that reach that node, and
define the conditional entropy of splitting feature xi at threshold t as
Hpy|xi : tq “ ppxi ă tqHpy|xi ă tq ` ppxi ě tqHpy|xi ě tq,
ÿ
where Hpy|xi ă tq “ ´
ppy “ a|xi ă tq log ppy “ a|Xi ă tq,
aPY
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
7
Algorithm 1: DTInv: Invariant generation algorithm using DT learning
def DTInv (P : program): safe inductive invariant for P or fail “
val X, y “ Sampler(P)
val H “ Slopes(P)
val Z “ X ¨ H T
val T “ LearnDT(Z, y)
val ϕ “ DTtoForm(T.root)
if IsInvariant(P , ϕ) then ϕ
else fail
def DTtoForm (v: node of a decision tree): formula represented by subtree rooted at v “
if v is a leaf then v.label
else pv.cond ^ DTtoForm(v.left) _ v.cond ^ DTtoForm(v.right)q
and ppAq is the empirical probability, i.e., the fraction of sample points reaching this
node that satisfy the condition A. Hpy|xi ě tq is defined similarly to Hpy|xi ă tq. Note
that if a particular split perfectly separates good and bad samples, then the conditional
entropy is 0. The greedy heuristic is to pick the feature and split that minimize the
conditional entropy. There are other measures as well, such as the Gini index, which is
used by the DT learner we used in our experiments [25].
4
Algorithm
We now present our DT-learning algorithm. We assume that we have black box procedures for sampling points from the given program, and for getting a set of slopes from
a chosen abstract domain. To this end, let Sampler be a procedure that takes a program and returns an n ˆ d matrix X of n sample points, and an n-dimensional vector y
corresponding to the label of each sample point (1 for good states, 0 otherwise). Similarly, let Slopes be a procedure that takes a program and returns an m ˆ d matrix H
of m hyperplane slopes. We describe the actual procedures used in our experiments in
Section 5.1.
Our final algorithm is surprisingly simple, and is given in Algorithm 1. We get the
sample points and the slopes from the helper functions mentioned above, and then transform the sample points according to the slopes given. We run a standard DT learning
algorithm on the transformed sample to obtain a tree that classifies all samples correctly.
The tree is then transformed into a formula that is a candidate invariant, by a simple procedure DTtoForm. Finally, the program is annotated with the candidate invariant and
verified. This final step is realized by another black box procedure IsInvariant,
which checks that the invariant satisfies the three conditions necessary to be a safe inductive invariant. For example, this can be done by encoding init, inv, post and safe as
SMT formulas and feeding the three conditions into an SMT solver.
To convert the DT into a formula, we note that the set of states that reach a particular
leaf is given by the conjunction of all predicates on the path from the root to that leaf.
Thus, the set of all states classified as good by the DT is the disjunction of the sets of
states that reach all the good leaves. A simple conversion is then to take the disjunction
8
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
over all paths to good leaves of the conjunction of all predicates on such paths. The
procedure DTtoForm computes this formula recursively by traversing the learned DT.
Since the tree was learnt on the transformed sample data, the predicate at each node
of the tree will be of the form zi ď c where zi is one of the columns of Z and c
is a constant. Since Z “ X ¨ H T , we know that zi pxq “ x ¨ wi for a sample x.
Thus, the predicate is equivalent to x ¨ wi ď c, which is a linear inequality in the
program variables. Combining this with the conversion procedure above, we see that
our algorithm outputs an invariant which is a Boolean combination of linear inequalities
over the numerical program variables.
Soundness. From the above discussion, we see that the formula ϕ returned by the procedure DTtoForm is of the required format. Moreover, we assume that the procedure
IsInvariant is correct. Thus, we can say that our invariant generation procedure
DTInv is sound: if it terminates successfully, it returns a safe inductive invariant.
Probabilistic Completeness. It is harder to prove that such invariant generation algorithms are complete. We see that the performance of our algorithm depends heavily on
the sample set, if the sample is inadequate, it is impossible for the DT learner to learn the
underlying invariant. One could augment our algorithm with a refinement loop, which
would make the role of the sampler less pronounced, for if the invariant is incorrect,
the theorem prover will return a counterexample that could potentially be added to the
sample set and we can re-run learning. However, we find in practice that we do not need
a refinement loop if our sample set is large enough.
We can justify this observation using Valiant’s PAC (probably approximately correct) model [33]. In this model, one can prove that an algorithm that classifies a large
enough sample of data correctly has small error on all data, with high probability. It
must be noted that one key assumption of this model is that the sample data is drawn
from the same distribution as the underlying data, an assumption that is hard to justify
in most of its applications, including this one. In practice however, PAC learning algorithms are empirically successful on a variety of applications where the assumption on
distribution is not clearly true. Formally, we can give a generalization guarantee for our
algorithm using this result of Blumer et al. [6]:
Theorem 1. A learning algorithm for a hypothesis class H that outputs a hypothesis
h P H will have true error at most with probability at least 1 ´ δ if h is consistent
log 13
with a sample of size maxp 4 log 2δ , 8V CpHq
q.
In the above theorem, a hypothesis is said to be consistent with a sample if it classifies
all points in the sample correctly. The quantity V CpHq is a property of the hypothesis
class called the Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension, and is a measure of the expressiveness of the hypothesis class. As one might imagine, more complex classes lead to a
looser bound on the error, as they are more likely to over-fit the sample and less likely
to generalize well.
Thus, it suffices for us to bound the VC dimension of our hypothesis class, which is
all finite Boolean combinations of hyperplanes in d dimensions. The VC dimension of a
class H is defined as the cardinality of the largest set of points that H can shatter. A set
of points is said to be shattered by a hypothesis class H if for every possible labeling
of the points, there exists a hypothesis in H that is consistent with it. Unfortunately,
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
9
DTs in all their generality can shatter points of arbitrarily high cardinality. Given any
set of m points, we can construct a DT with m leaves such that each point ends up at a
different leaf, and now we can label the leaf to match the labeling given.
Since in practice we will not be learning arbitrarily large trees, we can restrict our
algorithm a-priori to stop growing the tree when it reaches K nodes, for some fixed
K independent of the sample. Now one can use a basic, well-known lemma from [24]
combined with Sauer’s Lemma [29] to get that the VC dimension of bounded decision
trees is OpKd log Kq. Combining this with Theorem 1, we get the following polynomial bound for probabilistic completeness:
Theorem 2. Under the assumptions of the PAC model, the algorithm DTInv returns
an invariant that has true error at most with probability at least 1 ´ δ, given that its
sample size is Op 1 Kd log K log 1δ q .
Complexity. The running time of our algorithm depends on many factors such as the
running time of the sampling (which in turn depends on the benchmark being considered), and so is hard to measure precisely. However, the running time of the learning
routine for DTs is Opmn logpnqq, where m is the number of hyperplane slopes in H
and n is the number of sample points [7, 25]. The learning algorithm therefore scales
well to large sets of sample data.
Nonlinear invariants. An important property of our algorithm is that it generalizes
elegantly to nonlinear invariants as well. For example, if a particular program requires
invariants that reason about px mod 2q for some variable x, then we can learn such
invariants as follows: given the sampled states X, we add to it a new column that corresponds to a variable x1 , such that x1 “ x mod 2. We then run the rest of our algorithm
as before, but in the final invariant, replace all occurrences of x1 by px mod 2q. As is
easy to see, this procedure correctly learns the required nonlinear invariant. We have
added this feature to our implementation, and show that it works on benchmarks requiring these nonlinear features (see Section 5.2).
5
5.1
Implementation and Evaluation
Implementation
We implemented our algorithm in Python, using the scikit-learn library’s decision tree classifier [25] as the DT learner LearnDT. This implementation uses the
CART algorithm from [7] which learns in a greedy manner as described in Section 3,
and uses the Gini index.
We implemented a simple and naive Sampler: we considered all states that satisfied the precondition where the value of every variable was in the interval r´L, Ls. For
these states, we ran the program with a bound I on the number of iterations of loops,
and collected all states reached as good states. To find bad states, we looked at all states
that were a margin M away from every good state, ran the program from this state
(again with at most I iterations), and if the program failed an assertion, we collected all
the states on this path as bad states. The bounds L, I, M were initialized to low values
and increased until we had sampled enough states to prove our program correct.
10
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
For the Slopes function, we found that for most of the programs in our benchmarks it sufficed to consider slopes in the octagonal abstract domain. This consists
of all vectors in t´1, 0, 1ud with at most two non zero elements. In a few cases, we
needed additional slopes (see Table 1). For the programs hola15 and hola34, we
used a class of slopes of vectors in C d where C is a small set of constants that appear
in the program, and their negations.
We also developed methods to learn the class of slopes needed by a program by
looking at the states sampled. In [31], the authors suggest working in the null space of
the good states, viewed as a matrix. This is because if the good states lie in some lower
dimensional space, this would automatically suggest equality relationships among them
that can be used in the invariant. It also reduces the running time of the learning algorithm. Inspired by this, we propose using Principal Component Analysis [20] on the
good states to generate slopes. PCA is a method to find the basis of a set of points so
as to maximize the variance of the points with respect to the basis vectors. For example, if all the good points lie along the line 2x ` 3y “ 4, then the first PCA vector
will be p2, 3q, and intuition suggests that the invariant will use inequalities of the form
2x ` 3y ă c.
Finally, for the IsInvariant routine, we used the program verifier Boogie [4],
which allowed us to annotate our programs with the invariants we verified. Boogie uses
the SMT solver Z3 [12] as a back-end.
5.2
Evaluation
We compared our algorithm with a variety of other invariant inference tools and static
analyzers. We mainly focused on ML-based algorithms, but also considered tools based
on interpolation and abstract interpretation. Specifically, we considered:
– ICE [14]: an ML algorithm based on ICE-learning that uses an SMT solver to learn
numerical invariants.
– MCMC [30]: an ML algorithm based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods. There
are two versions of this algorithm, one that uses templates such as octagons for the
invariant, and one with all constants in the slopes picked from a fixed bag of constants. The two algorithms have very similar characteristics. We ran both versions 5
times each (as they are randomized) and report the better average result of the two
algorithms for each benchmark.
– SC [31]: an ML algorithm based on set cover. We only had access to the learning
algorithm proposed in [31] and not the sampling procedure. To obtain a meaningful
comparison, we combined it with the same sampler that we used in the implementation of our algorithm DTInv.
– CPAchecker [5]: a configurable software model checker. We chose the default
analysis based on predicate abstraction and interpolation.
– UFO [2]: a software model checker that combines abstract interpretation and interpolation (denoted CPA).
– InvGen [18]: an inference tool for linear invariants that combines abstract interpretation, constraint solving, and testing.
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
11
For our comparison, we chose a combination of 22 challenging benchmarks from various sources. In particular, we considered a subset of the benchmarks from [13, 14, 18,
31]. We chose the benchmarks at random among those that were hard for at least one
other tool to solve. Due to this bias in the selection, our experimental results do not
reflect the average performance of the tools that we compare against. Instead, the comparison should be considered as an indication that our approach provides a valuable
complementary technique to existing algorithms.
We ran our experiments on a machine with a quad-core 3.40GHz CPU and 16GB
RAM, running Ubuntu GNU/Linux. For the analysis of each benchmark, we used a
memory limit of 8GB and a timeout of 5 minutes. The results of the experiment are
summarized in Table 1. Here are the observations from our experiments (we provide
more in-depth explanations for these observations in the next section, where we discuss
related work in more detail):
– Our algorithm DTInv seems to learn complex Boolean invariants as easily as simple conjunctions.
– ICE seems to struggle on programs that needed large invariants. For some of these
(gopan, popl07), this is because the constraint solver runs out of time/memory, as
the constants used in the invariants are also large. For hola19 and prog4, ICE
stops because the tool has an inbuilt limit for the complexity of Boolean templates.
– However, ICE solves sum1 and trex3 quickly, even though they need many predicates, because the constant terms are small, so this space is searched first by ICE.
– Similarly, we notice that MCMC has difficulty finding large invariants, again because
the search space is huge.
– SC’s learning algorithm is consistently slower than DTInv, due to its higher running time complexity. It also runs out of memory for large sample sizes.
– DTInv is able to easily handle benchmarks that CPA, UFO and InvGen struggle
on. This is mainly because they are specialized for reasoning about linear invariants,
and have issues dealing with invariants that have complicated Boolean structure.
We also learned some of the weak points in our current approach:
– DTInv is slow in processing fig1 and prog4, both of which are handled by
at least one other tool without much effort. However, we note that most of this
time is spent in the sampling routine, which is currently a naive implementation.
We therefore believe that DT learning could benefit from a combination with a
static analysis that provides approximations of the good and bad states to guide the
sampler.
– We also note that the method of “constant slopes” which we used to handle the non
octagonal benchmarks (hola15, hola34) is ad-hoc, and might not work well for
larger benchmarks.
Beyond octagons. As mentioned in Section 4, we implemented a feature to learn certain nonlinear invariants. We were able to verify some benchmarks that needed reasoning about the modulus of certain variables, as shown in Table 1. Finally, we show one
example where we were able to infer a nonlinear invariant (specifically s “ i2 ^ i ď n
for square).
12
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
Name
Vars Type
Octagonal:
ex23 [14]
4 conj.
fig6 [14]
2 conj.
fig9 [14]
2 conj.
hola10 [13] 4 conj.
nested2 [31] 4 conj.
nested5 [18] 4 conj.
fig1 [14]
2 disj.
test1 [31]
4 disj.
cegar2 [14] 3 ABC
gopan [31]
2 ABC
hola18 [13] 3 ABC
hola19 [13] 4 ABC
popl07 [31] 2 ABC
prog4 [31]
3 ABC
sum1 [14]
3 ABC
trex3 [14]
8 ABC
Non octagonal:
hola15 [13] 3 conj.
Modulus:
hola02 [13] 4 conj.
hola06 [13] 4 conj.
hola22 [13] 4 conj.
Non octagonal modulus:
hola34 [13] 4 ABC
Quadratic:
square
3 conj.
|ϕ| Samp DT SC DTInv ICE MCMC
3
2
2
8
3
4
3
2
5
8
6
7
7
8
6
9
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.03
2.48
14.61
0.90
0.03
0.03
1.60
0.19
0.03
2.32
0.01
8.44
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.04
0.01
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.06
4.73
2.61
2.31
2.45
2.39
MO
F
7.86
2.64
2.54
MO
3.47
2.72
MO
2.61
MO
0.11
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.03
2.50
14.62
0.91
0.04
0.03
1.64
0.20
0.03
2.34
0.02
8.50
CPA UFO InvGen
8.82
0.01 19.77 1.50
0.30
0.00 1.68 0.13
0.33
0.00 1.73 0.13
49.21
TO 2.03
F
62.02
0.09 1.86 0.12
60.95 31.28* 2.08 0.35
0.38
5.13 1.75 1.64
0.39
TO 1.71
F
4.86 17.30 1.97 0.18
F
TO 63.85 58.29
TO 21.93*
TO 8.38
F
TO
F
F
F
TO 110.81 15.20
F
0.13
F
F
1.32 29.04*
F 0.17
4.51
NA
F 0.18
0.02
0.01
0.01
F
0.03
0.03
F
0.04
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
2
0.52 0.02 0.01
0.54 0.53
4
3
5
0.03 0.03
F
1.79 0.03 MO
0.04 0.00
F
0.06
1.82
0.04
F
F
F
NA
NA
NA
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
6
1.14 0.03 3.10
1.17
F
NA
F
F
F
3
0.27 0.24 MO
0.51
F
NA
F
F
F
0.04
MO 0.13
0.02
Table 1: Results of comparison. The table is divided according to what kinds of invariants the benchmark needed. The “Type” column denotes the Boolean structure of the
invariant - conjunctive, disjunctive and arbitrary Boolean combination are denoted as
conj., disj. and ABC respectively. The column |ϕ| contains the number of predicates in
the invariant found by DTInv.
The columns ’Samp’ and ’DT’ show the running time in seconds of our sampling and
DT learning procedures respectively. We show SC next, as we only compare learning
times with SC. Then follows the total time of our tool (DTInv), followed by those for
other tools. Each entry of the tool columns shows the running time in seconds if a safe
invariant was found, or otherwise one of the following entries. ’NA’: program contains
arithmetic operations that are not supported by the tool; ’F’: analysis terminated without
finding a safe invariant; ’TO’: timeout; ’MO’: out of memory. The times for MCMC have
an asterisk if at least one of the repetitions timed out. In this case the number shown is
the average of the other runs.
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
13
We believe our experiments show that Decision Trees are a natural representation
for invariants, and that the greedy learning heuristics guide the algorithm to discover
simple invariants of complex structures without additional overhead.
6
Related Work and Conclusions
Our experimental evaluation compared against other algorithms for invariant generation. We discuss these algorithms in more detail. Sharma et. al. [31] used the greedy set
cover algorithm SC to learn invariants in the form of arbitrary Boolean combinations of
linear inequalities. Our algorithm based on decision trees is simpler than the set cover
algorithm, works better on our benchmarks (which includes most of the benchmarks
from [31]), and scales much better to large sample sets of test data. The improved scalability is due to the better complexity of DT learners. The running time of our learning
algorithm is Opmn logpnqq where m is the number of features/hyperplane slopes that
we consider, and n the number of sample points. On the other hand, the set cover algorithm has a running time of Opmn3 q. This is because the greedy algorithm for set
cover takes time Ophn2 q where h is the number of hyperplanes, and [31] considers one
hyperplane for every candidate slope and sample point, yielding h “ mn.
When invariant generation is viewed as binary classification, then there is a problem
in the refinement loop: if the learned invariant is not inductive, it is unclear whether the
counterexample model produced by the theorem prover should be considered a “bad”
or a “good” state. The ICE-learning framework [14] solves this problem by formulating
invariant generation as a more general classification problem that also accounts for
implication constraints between points. We note that our algorithm does not fit within
this framework, as we do not have a refinement loop that can handle counterexamples
in the form of implications. However, we found in our experiments that we did not
need any refinement loop as our algorithm was able to infer correct invariants directly
after sampling enough data. Nevertheless, considering an ICE version of DT learning is
interesting as sampling without a refinement loop becomes difficult for more complex
programs.
The paper [14] also proposes a concrete algorithm for inferring linear invariants
that fits into the ICE-learning framework (referred to as ICE in our evaluation). If we
compare the complexity of learning given a fixed sample, our algorithm performs better
than [14] both in terms of running time and expressiveness of the invariant. The ICE
algorithm of [14] iterates through templates for the invariant. This iteration is done
by dovetailing between more complex Boolean structures and increasing the range of
the thresholds used. For a fixed template, it formulates the problem of this template
being consistent with all given samples as a constraint in quantifier-free linear integer
arithmetic. Satisfiability of this constraint is then checked using an SMT solver. We note
that the size of the generated constraint is linear in the sample size, and that solving
such constraints is NP-complete. In comparison, our learning is sub-quadratic time in
the sample size. Also, we do not need to fix templates for the Boolean structure of the
invariant or bound the thresholds a priori. Instead, the DT learner automatically infers
those parameters from the sample data.
14
Siddharth Krishna, Christian Puhrsch, and Thomas Wies
Another ICE-learning algorithm based on randomized search was proposed in [30]
(the algorithm MCMC in our evaluation). This algorithm searches over a fixed space of
invariants S that is chosen in advance either by bounding the Boolean structure and
coefficients of inequalities, or by picking some finite sub-lattice of an abstract domain.
Given a sample, it randomly searches using a combination of random walks and hill
climbing until it finds a candidate invariant that satisfies all the samples. There is no
obvious bound on the time of this search other than the trivial bound of |S|. Again,
we have the advantage that we do not have to provide templates of the Boolean structure and the thresholds of the hyperplanes. These parameters have to be fixed for the
algorithm in [30]. Furthermore, the greedy nature of DT learning is a heuristic to try
simpler invariants before more complex ones, and hence the invariants we find for these
benchmarks are often much simpler than those found by MCMC.
Decision trees have been previously used for inferring likely preconditions of procedures [28]. Although this problem is related to invariant generation, there are considerable technical differences to our algorithm. In particular, the algorithm proposed
in [28] only learns formulas that fall into a finite abstract domain (Boolean combinations of a given finite set of predicates), whereas we use decision trees to learn more
general formulas in an infinite abstract domain (e.g., unions of octagons).
We believe that the main value of our algorithm is its ability to infer invariants
with a complex Boolean structure efficiently from test data. Other techniques for inferring such invariants include predicate abstraction [16] as well as abstract interpretation techniques such as disjunctive completion [10]. However, for efficiency reasons,
many static analyses are restricted to inferring conjunctive invariants in practice [3, 11].
There exist techniques for recovering loss of precision due to imprecise joins using
counterexample-guided refinement [1, 21, 26]. In the future, we will explore whether
DL learning can be used to complement such refinement techniques for static analyses.
References
1. A. Albarghouthi, A. Gurfinkel, and M. Chechik. Craig interpretation. In SAS, volume 7460
of LNCS, pages 300–316. Springer, 2012.
2. A. Albarghouthi, A. Gurfinkel, Y. Li, S. Chaki, and M. Chechik. UFO: verification with
interpolants and abstract interpretation - (competition contribution). In TACAS, volume 7795
of LNCS, pages 637–640. Springer, 2013.
3. T. Ball, A. Podelski, and S. K. Rajamani. Boolean and cartesian abstraction for model checking C programs. In TACAS, volume 2031 of LNCS, pages 268–283. Springer, 2001.
4. M. Barnett, B. E. Chang, R. DeLine, B. Jacobs, and K. R. M. Leino. Boogie: A modular
reusable verifier for object-oriented programs. In FMCO 2005, Revised Lectures, pages
364–387, 2005.
5. D. Beyer and M. E. Keremoglu. Cpachecker: A tool for configurable software verification.
In CAV, volume 6806 of LNCS, pages 184–190. Springer, 2011.
6. A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler, and M. K. Warmuth. Learnability and the vapnikchervonenkis dimension. J. ACM, 36(4):929–965, 1989.
7. L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone. Classification and Regression
Trees. Wadsworth, 1984.
8. E. M. Clarke, O. Grumberg, S. Jha, Y. Lu, and H. Veith. Counterexample-guided abstraction
refinement. In CAV, volume 1855 of LNCS, pages 154–169. Springer, 2000.
Learning Invariants using Decision Trees
15
9. P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis
of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In POPL, 1977.
10. P. Cousot and R. Cousot. Systematic design of program analysis frameworks. In POPL,
pages 269–282, San Antonio, Texas, 1979. ACM.
11. P. Cousot, R. Cousot, J. Feret, L. Mauborgne, A. Miné, D. Monniaux, and X. Rival. The
astreé analyzer. In ESOP, volume 3444 of LNCS, pages 21–30. Springer, 2005.
12. L. De Moura and N. Bjørner. Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In TACAS, LNCS, pages 337–
340. Springer, 2008.
13. I. Dillig, T. Dillig, B. Li, and K. L. McMillan. Inductive invariant generation via abductive
inference. In OOPSLA, pages 443–456. ACM, 2013.
14. P. Garg, C. Löding, P. Madhusudan, and D. Neider. ICE: A robust framework for learning
invariants. In CAV, volume 8559 of LNCS, pages 69–87. Springer, 2014.
15. P. Godefroid, A. V. Nori, S. K. Rajamani, and S. Tetali. Compositional may-must program
analysis: unleashing the power of alternation. In POPL, pages 43–56. ACM, 2010.
16. S. Graf and H. Saidi. Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In CAV, pages 72–83,
1997.
17. B. S. Gulavani, T. A. Henzinger, Y. Kannan, A. V. Nori, and S. K. Rajamani. SYNERGY: a
new algorithm for property checking. In FSE, pages 117–127, 2006.
18. A. Gupta and A. Rybalchenko. Invgen: An efficient invariant generator. In CAV, volume
5643 of LNCS, pages 634–640. Springer, 2009.
19. L. Hyafil and R. L. Rivest. Constructing optimal binary decision trees is np-complete. Inf.
Process. Lett., 5(1):15–17, 1976.
20. I. T. Jolliffe. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Verlag, 1986.
21. B. Kafle and J. P. Gallagher. Tree automata-based refinement with application to horn clause
verification. In VMCAI, LNCS. Springer, 2015. To appear.
22. A. Miné. The octagon abstract domain. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, 19(1):31–
100, 2006.
23. T. M. Mitchell. Machine learning. McGraw Hill series in computer science. McGraw-Hill,
1997.
24. M. Mohri. Foundations of machine learning 2014: Homework assignment 1 (problem c).,
Oct. 2014.
25. F. Pedregosa, G. Varoquaux, A. Gramfort, V. Michel, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, M. Blondel,
P. Prettenhofer, R. Weiss, V. Dubourg, J. Vanderplas, A. Passos, D. Cournapeau, M. Brucher,
M. Perrot, and E. Duchesnay. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine
Learning Research, 12:2825–2830, 2011.
26. A. Podelski and T. Wies. Counterexample-guided focus. In POPL, pages 249–260. ACM,
2010.
27. J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, 1993.
28. S. Sankaranarayanan, S. Chaudhuri, F. Ivancic, and A. Gupta. Dynamic inference of likely
data preconditions over predicates by tree learning. In ISSTA, pages 295–306, 2008.
29. N. Sauer. On the density of families of sets. J. Comb. Theor. Ser. A, 25:80–83, 1972.
30. R. Sharma and A. Aiken. From invariant checking to invariant inference using randomized
search. In CAV, volume 8559 of LNCS, pages 88–105. Springer, 2014.
31. R. Sharma, S. Gupta, B. Hariharan, A. Aiken, and A. V. Nori. Verification as learning geometric concepts. In F. Logozzo and M. Fähndrich, editors, SAS, volume 7935 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 388–411. Springer, 2013.
32. R. Sharma, A. V. Nori, and A. Aiken. Interpolants as classifiers. In CAV, volume 7358 of
LNCS, pages 71–87. Springer, 2012.
33. L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Commun. ACM, 27(11):1134–1142, 1984.
34. G. Yorsh, T. Ball, and M. Sagiv. Testing, abstraction, theorem proving: better together! In
ISSTA, pages 145–156. ACM, 2006.
| 6cs.PL
|
Belief Propagation Min-Sum Algorithm for
Generalized Min-Cost Network Flow
arXiv:1710.07600v1 [stat.ML] 20 Oct 2017
Andrii Riazanov1, Yury Maximov2 and Michael Chertkov3
Abstract— Belief Propagation algorithms are instruments
used broadly to solve graphical model optimization and statistical inference problems. In the general case of a loopy
Graphical Model, Belief Propagation is a heuristic which is
quite successful in practice, even though its empirical success,
typically, lacks theoretical guarantees. This paper extends the
short list of special cases where correctness and/or convergence
of a Belief Propagation algorithm is proven.
We generalize formulation of Min-Sum Network Flow problem by relaxing the flow conservation (balance) constraints and
then proving that the Belief Propagation algorithm converges
to the exact result.
I. INTRODUCTION
Belief Propagation algorithms were designed to solve
optimization and inference problems in graphical models.
Since a variety of problems from different fields of science
(communication, statistical physics, machine learning, computer vision, signal processing, etc.) can be formulated in the
context of graphical model, Belief Propagation algorithms
are of great interest for research during the last decade [1],
[2]. These algorithms belong to message-passing heuristic,
which contains distributive, iterative algorithms with little
computation performed per iteration.
There are two types of problems in graphical models
of the greatest interest: computation of the marginal distribution of a random variable, and finding the assignment
which maximizes the likelihood. Sum-product and Min-sum
algorithms were designed for solving these two problems
under the heuristic of Belief Propagation. Originally, the
sum-product algorithm was formulated on trees ([3], [4],
[5]), for which this algorithm represents the idea of dynamic
programming in the message-passing concept, where variable
nodes transmit messages between each other along the edges
of the graphical model. However, these algorithms showed
surprisingly good performance even when applied to the
graphical models of non-tree structure ([6], [7], [8], [9],
[10]). Since Belief Propagation algorithms can be naturally
*The work was supported by funding from the U.S. Department of
Energy’s Office of Electricity as part of the DOE Grid Modernization
Initiative.
1 Andrii Riazanov is with the Computer Science Department,
Carnegie
Mellon
University,
Pittsburgh,
PA
15213,
USA.
[email protected]
2 Yury Maximov is with Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center for Energy Systems, and Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Division T-4 & CNLS, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA
[email protected]
3 Michael Chertkov is with Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Center for Energy Systems, and Los Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Division T-4, Los Alamos, NM 87544, USA
[email protected]
implemented and paralleled using the simple idea of message passing, these instruments are widely used for finding
approximate solutions to optimization of inference problems.
However, despite the good practical performance of this
heuristic in many cases, the theoretical grounding of these
algorithm remain unexplored (to some extend), so there are
no actual proofs that the algorithms give correct (or even
approximately correct) answers for the variety of problem
statements. That’s why one of important tasks is to explore
the scope of the problems, for which these algorithms indeed
can be applied, and to justify their practical usage.
In [11] the authors proved that the Belief Propagation
algorithm give correct answers for Min-Cost Network Flow
problem, regardless of the underlying graph being a tree or
not. Moreover, the pseudo-polynomial time convergence was
proven for these problems, if some additional conditions hold
(the uniqueness of the solution and integral input). This work
significantly extended the set of problems, for which Belief
Propagation algorithms are justified.
In this paper we formulate the extension of Min-Cost
Network Flow problem, which we address as Generalized
Min-Cost Network Flow problem (GMNF). This problem
statement is much broader then the original formulation,
but we amplify the ideas of [11] to prove that Belief
Propagation algorithms also give the correct answers for this
generalization of the problem. This extension might find a
lot of applications in various fields of study, since GMNF
problem is the general problem of linear programming with
additional constraints on the cycles of the underlying graphs
(more precise, on the coefficient of corresponding vertices),
which might be natural for some practical formulations.
II. GENERALIZED MIN-COST NETWORK FLOW
A. Problem statement
Let G = (V, E) be a directed graph, where V is the set
of vertices and E is the set of edges, |V | = n, |E| = m. For
any vertex v we denote Ev as the set of edges incident to v,
and aev is the coefficient related to this pair (v, e), such that
aev > 0 if e is an out-arc with respect to v (e.g. e = (v, w)
for some vertex w), and aev < 0 if e is an in-arc with respect
to v (e.g. e = (w, v) for some vertex w).
For any vertex v and edges e1 , e2 incident to v we
ae1
define δ(v, e1 , e2 ) , ev2 . Then we consider the following
av
property of the graph:
Definition 2.1: The graph G is called ratio-balanced if
for every non-directed cycle C which consists of vertices
{v1 , v2 , v3 , . . . , vk } and edges {e1 , e2 , e3 , . . . , ek } it holds:
k
Y
δ(vi , ei , vi−1 ) = δ(v1 , ek , e1 ) · δ(v2 , e1 , e2 ) · . . . · ×
i=1
×δ(vk−1 , ek−2 , ek−1 ) · δ(vk , ek−1 , ek ) = 1.
(1)
follows:
c(C) , c1 + δ(v2 , e1 , e2 )×
!
× c2 + δ(v3 , e2 , e3 ) c3 + · · · + δ(vk , ek−1 , ek )ck · · · =
= c1 +
Here by non-directed cycle we mean that for every
pair (vi , vi−1 ) and the pair (v1 , vk ) it holds that either
(vi , vi−1 ) ∈ E or (vi−1 , vi ) ∈ E. It is not hard to verify
that it suffices for equation (1) to hold only for every simple
non-directed cycle of G, since then the equation (1) can be
easily deduced to hold for arbitrary non-directed cycle.
To check that the given graph is ratio-balances, one then
need to check whether (1) holds for any simple cycle. If m is
the number of edges, and C is the number of simple cycles
of G, one obviously needs at least O(m + C) time to iterate
trough all simple cycles. In fact, the optimal algorithm for
this task was introduced in [12], which runs for O(m + C)
time. Then, to check whether a graph is ratio-balances, one
may use this algorithm to iterate through all simple cycles
and to check (1) for every one of them.
We formulate the Generalized Min-Cost Network Flow
problem for ratio-balanced graph G as follows:
minimize
X
ce xe
e∈E
subject to
X
aev xe = fv ,
∀v ∈ V,
(GMNF)
e∈Ev
0 ≤ xe ≤ ue ,
∀e ∈ E.
Here the first set of constrains are balance constraints which
must hold for each vertex. The second set of constrains consists of capacity constraints on each edge of G. Coefficients
ce and ue , defined for each edge e ∈ E, are called the cost
and the capacity of the edge, respectively. Any assignment
of x in this problem which satisfies the balance and capacity
constraints
P is referred as flow. Finally, the objective function
g(x) = e∈E ce xe is called the total flow.
B. Definitions and properties
For the given (GMNF) problem on the graph G and flow
x on this graph, the residual network G(x) is defined as
follows: G(x) has the same vertex set as G, and for each
edge e = (v, w) ∈ E if xe < ue then e is an arc in G(x)
with the cost cxe = ce and coefficients (aev )x = aev , (aew )x =
aew . Finally, if xe > 0 then there is an arc e′ = (w, v)
in G(x) with the cost cxe′ = −ce and coefficients (aev )x =
−aev , (aew )x = −aew . It is not hard to see that G(x) is ratiobalanced whenever G is, since only the absolute values of
the coefficients aev occur in the definition of this property.
Then for each directed cycle C = ({v1 , v2 , v3 , . . . , vk },
{e1 , e2 , e3 , . . . , ek }) we define the cost of this cycle as
k
X
i=2
ci
i
Y
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej )
j=2
It is easy to see that c(C) is properly defined whenever
the graph G is ratio-constrained.
Then we define σ(x) , min{cx (C)}, where the minimum
C
is taken over all cycles C in the residual network G(x).
Lemma 2.1: If (GMNF) has a unique solution x∗ , then
σ(x∗ ) > 0.
Proof: We will show that for every directed cycle C
from G(x∗ ) we can push the additional flow through the
edges of this cycle such that the linear constraints in (GMNF)
will still be satisfied, but the total flow in the cycle will
change by ε · cx (C) for some ε > 0.
Let C = ({v1 , v2 , v3 , . . . , vk }, {e1 , e2 , e3 , . . . , ek }). From
the definition of the residual network it follows that we
can increase the flow in every edge of the cycle for some
positive quantity such that the capacity constraints will still
be satisfied. Let’s push additional flow ε > 0 trough e1 . In
order to satisfy the balance constraint in v1 , we need to adjust
the flow in e2 . We have 4 cases: either one of e1 , e2 can be
in G, or their opposites can be in G. If e ∈ C is in G, we
will say that it is ’direct’ arc, otherwise it will be ’opposite’.
Then there are four cases:
1) e1 , e2 are direct arcs. Then we have the new flow
on edge e − 1: y1 = x∗1 + ε. In order to satisfy
the balance constraint for the vertex v2 , is must hold
aev12 x∗1 + aev22 x∗2 = aev12 y1 + aev22 y2 = aev12 x∗1 + aev12 ε +
aev22 y2
⇒
aev22 (x∗2 − y2 ) = aev12 ε
⇒
y2 =
e1
a
v2
∗
x2 − ε e2 . Since both e1 and e2 are direct, it means
av2
that e1 = (v1 , v2 ) ∈ E, and e2 = (v2 , v3 ) ∈ E, and
thus, by definition, aev12 < 0, and aev22 > 0. Therefore,
we have y2 = x∗2 + εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 ).
2) e1 is direct, e2 is opposite. Then again,
y1 = x∗1 + ε, but now ’pushing’ the flow through
e2 (as the edge in the residual network) means
decreasing x2 . The same equalities holds, so
ae1
y2 = x∗2 − ε ev22 = x∗2 − εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 ). Since e2
av2
is opposite arc, that means that we should push
additional εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 ) through e2 .
3) e1 is opposite, e2 is direct – similar to the case 2).
4) e1 , e2 are opposite arcs – similar to the case 1).
So, if we push ε through e1 , we need to push ε2 =
εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 ) through e2 to keep the balance in v2 . Then,
analogically, to maintain the balance in v3 , we need to push
additional ε3 = ε2 δ(v3 , e2 , e3 ) = εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 )δ(v3 , e2 , e3 )
through e3 . Then, consequently adjusting the balance in
all the vertexes of C, we will retrieve that to keep the
balance
Qk in vk , we need to push εk = εk−1 δ(vk , ek−1 , ek ) =
ε i=2 δ(vi , ei−1 , ei ) through ek . Now it suffices to show
that the balance in v1 is also satisfied. Similarly, we know
that if we push εk Q
in ek , then we need to push ε1 =
εk δ(v1 , ek , e1 ) = ε ki=1 δ(vi , ei−1 , e1 ) = ε (since G is
ratio-balanced) through e1 , and that is exactly the amount
which we assumed to push at the beginning of this proof.
So we indeed push consistent flow through all the edges of C
in such a way that the balance constraints in all the vertices
is satisfied. We now only need to mention that we can take
ε > 0 as small as it is needed to satisfy also all the capacity
constraints in the cycle.
Now the additional total cost of such adjusting will be
k
X
Proof:
l(R) = c1 + δ(v2 , e1 , e2 ) c2 + δ(v3 , e2 , e3 )×
!
=
× · · · ck−2 + δ(vk−1 , ek−2 , ek−1 )ck−1 · · ·
= c1 +
+
|
cxi εi = cx1 ε + cx2 εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 )+
+cx2 εδ(v2 , e1 , e2 )δ(v3 , e2 , e3 ) + · · · + cxk ε
δ(vi , ei−1 , ei ) =
×
ci
i=2
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej )
j=2
We also define the ’reducer’ of the path as follows:
t(S) ,
min
j=2,...,k−1
j
Y
|
m
X
i=2
p−1
Y
j=2
"
c′i
i
Y
}
#
+
δ(vj′ , e′j−1 , e′j )
j=2
{z
× cp +
}
δ(vj′ , e′j−1 , e′j ) ·δ(vp , e′m , ep )×
{z
k−1
X
i=p+1
"
}
i
Y
ci
"
p−1
X
i=2
j=p+1
ci
i
Y
j=2
k−1
X
i=p+1
"
i
Y
ci
#
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) ≥
#
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) +
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) ·
δ(vi , ei−1 , ei )
{z
c(C)
≥ c1 +
+
(δ(v1′ ,e′m ,e′1 ))−1
i=2
To prove the main result of this paper we will use the
following crucial lemma:
Lemma 2.2: Let G be any ratio-balanced graph, or a
residual network of some ratio-balanced graph (as we already
mentioned, the residual network will also be ratio-balanced
in this case). Let S = ({v1 , · · · , vk }, {e1, · · · , ek−1 })
′
be a directed path in G, and C = ({v1′ , v2′ , · · · , vm
},
{e′1 , e′2 , · · · , e′m }) be a cycle with v1′ = vp . Let R be
′
, v1′ =
the path R = {v1 , v2 , · · · , vp = v1′ , v2′ , . . . , vm
vp , vp+1 , . . . , vk }. Then l(R) ≥ l(S) + T c(C), where T =
minS t(S) is the minimum of all the reducers among all
directed paths S in G.
m
Y
× cp +
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) +
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) · δ(vp , ep−1 , e′1 )×
j=2
!
× · · · ck−2 + δ(vk−1 , ek−2 , ek−1 )ck−1 · · ·
=
= c1 +
j=2
l(S) , c1 + δ(v2 , e1 , e2 ) c2 + δ(v3 , e2 , e3 )×
i
Y
+
j=2
#
≥T
p−1
Y
∗
k−1
X
j=2
Now it is obvious that if cx (C) ≤ 0 for some C, we can
change the flow in G such that the total cost will not increase.
It means that either x∗ is not an optimal flow, or it is not
the unique solution of (GMNF).
Next we define the cost of a directed path in G or G(x):
Definition 2.2: Let S = ({v1 , · · · , vk }, {e1, · · · , ek−1 })
be a directed path. Then the cost of this path is defined as
ci
i
Y
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) · δ(vp , ep−1 , e′1 ) ×
|
i=2
= ε · cx (C)
i=2
× c′1 +
i=1
k
Y
p−1
Y
"
p−1
X
e′
e
av1′
avp−1
p
e′
av1p
|
j=p+1
1
e′m
v1′
a
{z
e′
avm
p
×
e
avpp
}
δ(vp ,ep−1 ,ep )
#
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) +
+T c(C) =
#
"
p−1
i
Y
X
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) +
ci
= c1 +
j=2
i=2
+
p
Y
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej )×
j=2
× cp +
k−1
X
i=p+1
"
ci
i
Y
j=p+1
#
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) + T c(C) =
#
" i
p−1
Y
X
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) +
ci
= c1 +
B. Computation trees
One of the important notions used for proving correctness
and/or
convergence for BP algorithm is the computation tree
#
" i
k−1
([11], [13], [14], [15]) (unwrapped tree in some sources). The
Y
X
δ(vj , ej−1 , ej ) + T c(C) =
ci
+
idea under this construction is the following: for the fixed
j=2
i=p
edge e of the graph G, one might want to build a tree of
depth N , such that performing N iterations of BP on graph
= l(S) + T c(C)
G gives the same estimation of flow on e, as the optimal
solution of the appropriately defined (GMNF) problem on
the computation tree TeN .
Since the proof of our result is based on the compuIII. B ELIEF P ROPAGATION ALGORITHM FOR GMNF
tation trees approach, in this subsection we describe the
construction in details. We will use the same notations for
A. Min-Sum algorithm
computation tree, as in [11] (section 5).
Algorithm 1 represents the Belief Propagation Min-Sum
In this paper we consider the computation trees, correalgorithm for (GMNF) from [11]. In the algorithm the func- sponding to edges of G. We say that e ∈ E is the ”root”
tions φe (z) and ψv (z) are the variable and factor functions, for N -level computation tree TeN . Each vertex or edge of
respectively, defined for v ∈ V, e ∈ E as follows:
TeN is a duplicate of some vertex or edge of G. Define the
′
N
N
(
mapping ΓN
e : V (Te ) → V (G) such that if v ∈ V (Te ) is
N
′
ce z e
if 0 ≤ ze ≤ ue ,
a duplicate of v ∈ V (G), then Γe (v ) = v. In other words,
φe (z) =
this function maps each duplicate from V (TeN ) to its inverse
+∞
otherwise.
(
P
in V (G).
e
0
if
e∈Ev av ze = fv ,
The easiest way to describe the construction is inductively.
ψv (z) =
+∞
otherwise.
Let e = (v, w) ∈ E(G). Then the tree Te0 consists of two
vertices v ′ , w′ , such that Γ0e (v ′ ) = v, Γ0e (w′ ) = w, and an
edge e′ = (v ′ , w′ ). We say that v ′ , w′ belong to 0-level
Algorithm 1 BP for (GMNF)
of Te0 . Note that for any two vertices v ′ , w′ ∈ V (Te0 ) it
0
0
holds
that (v ′ , w′ ) ∈ E(Te0 ) ⇔ (Γ0e (v ′ ), Γ0e (w′ )) ∈ E(G),
1: Initialize t = 0, messages me→v (z) = 0, me→w (z) =
so
the
vertices in a tree are connected with an edge if and
0, ∀z ∈ R for each e = (v, w) ∈ E.
only
if
their inverse in the initial graph are connected. This
2: for t = 1, 2, . . . N do
property
will hold for all trees TeN . Now assume that we
3:
For each e = (v, w) ∈ E update messages as
defined a tree TeN , such that for any v ′ , w′ ∈ V (TeN ) it
follows:
′
N
′
holds that (v ′ , w′ ) ∈ E(TeN ) ⇔ (ΓN
e (v ), Γe (w )) ∈ E(G).
N
N
mte→v (z) = φe (z)+
Denote by L(Te ) the set of leafs of Te (vertices which
X
are
connected by edge with exactly one another vertex). For
mt−1
zẽ ) , ∀z ∈ R
ψw (~z) +
+
min
e→w (~
|E
|
w
any
u′ ∈ L(TeN ), denote by P (u′ ) the vertex, with which
~
z ∈R
,~
ze =z
ẽ∈Ew \e
′
u is connected by edge (so either (u′ , P (u′ )) ∈ E(TeN ) or
(P (u′ ), u′ ) ∈ E(TeN )). We now build TeN +1 by extending
mte→w (z) = φe (z)+
the three TeN as follows: for every u′ ∈ L(TeN ) let u =
X
N
′
N
′
mt−1
(~zẽ ) , ∀z ∈ R Γe (u ), and consider the set Bu′ = Su \ {Γe (P (u ))},
ψv (~z) +
+
min
e→v
~
z ∈R|Ev | ,~
ze =z
where Su is the set of neighbors of u in G. Then for every
ẽ∈Ev \e
vertex w ∈ Bu′ add vertex w′ to expand V (TeN ) and an edge
4:
t := t + 1
(u′ , w′ ) if (u, w) ∈ E or an edge (w′ , u′ ) if (w, u) ∈ E to
+1
5: end for
expand E(TeN ), and set ΓN
(w′ ) = w. Also set the level
e
′
6: For each e = (v, w) ∈ E, set the belief function as
of w to be equal (N + 1).
N
N
N
So, the tree TeN +1 contains TeN as an induced subtree, and
be = φe (z) + me→v (z) + me→w (z)
also contains vertices on level N + 1, which are connected
7: Calculate the belief estimate by finding x̂N
∈ to leafs of T N (in fact, it is easy to see that new vertices
e
e
arg min bN
e (z) for each e ∈ E.
are connected only with leafs from N th level). From the
8: Return x̂N as an estimation of the optimal solution of
construction, one may see that for any v ′ , w′ ∈ V (TeN +1 ) it
+1 ′
+1
(GMNF).
holds that (v ′ , w′ ) ∈ E(TeN +1 ) ⇔ (ΓN
(v ), ΓN
(w′ )) ∈
e
e
E(G). In fact, any vertex of TeN +1 with level less then
We address the reader to the article [11] for more details, (N + 1) is a local copy of the corresponding vertex from G.
intuition and justifications on the Belief Propagation algo- More precisely: let v ′ ∈ V (TeN +1 ) and the level of v ′ is less
+1 ′
rithm for general optimization problems, linear programs, or or equal then N . Denote v = ΓN
(v ). Then for any vertex
e
Min-Cost Network Flow in particular.
w ∈ V (G) such that either (v, w) ∈ E(G) or (w, v) ∈ E(G),
i=2
j=2
there exist exactly one vertex w′ ∈ V (TeN +1 ) such that
+1
ΓN
(w′ ) = w and v ′ is connected with w′ in the same
e
way (direction) as v and w are connected in G. Then it is
clear that we can extend the mapping Γ on edges by saying
+1 ′
+1 ′
+1
ΓN
(e = (v ′ , w′ )) = (ΓN
(v ), ΓN
(w′ )). Now for
e
e
e
′
N +1
every vertex v ∈ V (Te
) and an incident edge ẽ, we
+1 ′
can define the coefficient aẽv′ = aev , where v = ΓN
(v ),
e
N +1
and e = Γe (ẽ). We also set the cost and capacity on
the computation tree correspondingly to the initial graph, so
+1
+1
cẽ = cΓN
(ẽ) and uẽ = uΓN
(ẽ)
e
e
Now assume there is a (GMNF) problem stated for a
graph G. We define the induced (GMNF)N
e problem on a
computation tree TeN in the following way. Let V 0 (TeN ) ⊂
V (TeN ) be a set of vertices with levels less than N . Then
consider the problem:
X
minimize
cẽ xẽ
ẽ∈E(TeN )
subject to
X
aẽv′ xẽ = fv′ ,
∀v ′ ∈ V 0 (TeN ),
ẽ∈Ev′
∀ẽ ∈ E(TeN ).
(GMNFN
e )
N
Roughly speaking, (GMNFe ) is just a simple (GMNF)
on a computation tree, except that there are no balance
constraints for the vertices of N th level. Keeping in mind
that the computation tree is locally equivalent to the initial
graph, and that Min-Sum algorithm belongs to messagepassing heuristic, which means that the algorithm works
locally at each step, one can intuitively guess that BP for
(GMNFN
e ) works quite similar as BP for the initial (GMNF).
This reasoning can be formalized in the following lemma
from [11].
Lemma 3.1: Let x̂N
e be the value produced by BP for
(GMNF) at the end of iteration N for the flow value on
edge e ∈ E. Then there exists an optimal solution y ∗ of
∗
′
N
N
(GMNFN
e ) such that ye′ = x̂e , where e is the root of Te .
Though this lemma was proven only for ordinary MinCost Network Flow problem, where |aev | = 1 for all v, e, its
proof doesn’t rely on these coefficients at any point, which
allows us to extend it for any values of these coefficients.
0 ≤ xẽ ≤ uẽ ,
C. Main results
We will now use lemma 3.1 to prove our main result
of correctness of BP Min-Sum for (GMNF). The following
theorem is the generalization of Theorem 4.1 from [11], and
our proof shares the ideas from the original proof.
Let n = |V (G)|, and denote by x̂N the estimation of flow
after N iterations of Algorithm 1.
Theorem 3.2: Suppose (GMNF) has a unique solution x∗ .
Define L to be the maximum absolute value of the cost of
a simple directed path in G(x∗ ), and T as the minimum
of
the reducersamong all such paths. Then for any N ≥
L
+ 1 n, x̂N = x∗ .
2σ(x∗ )T
Proof: Suppose to the contrary
that there
exists e0 =
L
(vα , vβ ) ∈ E and N ≥
+ 1 n such that
2σ(x∗ )T
∗
x̂N
e0 6= xe0 . By Lemma 3.1, there exist an optimal solution
∗
∗
N
∗
∗
y of GMNFN
e0 such that ye0 = x̂e0 , and thus ye0 = xe0 .
∗
∗
Then, without loss of generality, assume ye0 > xe0 . We will
show that it it possible to adjust y ∗ in such way, that the
flow in GMNFN
e0 will decrease, which will contradict to the
optimality of y ∗ .
Let e′0 = (vα′ , vβ′ ) be the root edge of the computation tree
∗
N
Te0 . Since y ∗ is a feasible solution of GMNFN
e0 and x is a
feasible solution of GMNF:
X
X
e′
fΓ(vα′ ) =
aẽvα′ yẽ∗ = av0α′ ye∗′0 +
aẽvα′ yẽ∗
ẽ∈Ev′
ẽ∈Ev′
α \e0
α
fΓ(vα′ ) =
X
e′
∗
0
aẽΓ(vα′ ) x∗ẽ = aΓ(v
′ ) xe0 +
α
ẽ∈EΓ(v′
α)
X
aẽΓ(vα′ ) x∗ẽ
ẽ∈Ev′
α \e0
Since the nodes and the edges in the computation tree TeN0
are copies of nodes and vertexes in G, aẽΓ(v′ ) = aẽvα′ . Then
α
from above equalities it follows that there exists e′1 6= e′0
′
e
incident to vα′ in TeN0 such that av1α′ (x∗Γ(e′ ) − ye∗1 ′ ) > 0. If
e′
1
av1α′ > 0, then e′1 is an in-arc for vα′ , and we say that e′1
has the same orientation, as e′0 . In such case, x∗Γ(e′ ) > ye∗1 ′ .
1
Otherwise, we say that e′1 has the opposite orientation, and
x∗Γ(e′ ) < ye∗1 ′ . Using the similar arguments, we will find
1
e′−1 6= e′0 incident to vβ′ satisfying similar condition. Then we
can apply the similar reasoning for the other ends of e′1 , e′−1 ,
using the balance constraints and inequalities on components
of x∗ and y ∗ for corresponding vertexes. In the end, we will
have a non-directed path starting and ending in leaves of
TeN0 : X = {e′−N , e′−N +1 , . . . , e′−1 , e′0 , e′1 , . . . , e′N } such that
for −N ≤ i ≤ N one of two cases holds:
∗
∗
′
′
′
• ye′ > xΓ(e′ ) . Then ei = (v , w ) has the same orientation as e0 . In this case, define Aug(e′ ) = (v ′ , w′ ) and
e′ ∈ D.
∗
∗
′
′
′
• ye′ < xΓ(e′ ) . Then ei = (v , w ) and e0 have opposite
i
i
′
orientations. Define Aug(e ) = (w′ , v ′ ) and e′ ∈ O.
Note that the capacity constraints are similar for corresponding vertices from GMNFN
e0 and GMNF, and since
,
hence,
every e′ ∈ X it holds
y ∗ is feasible for GMNFN
e0
0 ≤ ye∗′ ≤ ue′ = uΓe′ . Then, for any e′ ∈ D, we have
x∗Γ(e′ ) < ye∗′ ≤ ue′ , which means that Γ(e′ ) ∈ G(x∗ ) (from
the definition of the residual network). Note that in this case
e′ = Aug(e′ ), so Γ(Aug(e′ )) ∈ E(G(x∗ )). Next, let’s now
e′ = (v ′ , w′ ) ∈ O, and thus x∗Γ(e′ ) > ye∗′ ≥ 0. Again, out
of the definition of the residual network, (Γ(w′ ), Γ(v ′ )) ∈
E(G(x∗ )). But since e′ ∈ O, we have Aug(e′ ) = (w′ , v ′ ),
thus Γ(Aug(e′ )) ∈ E(G(x∗ )). Therefore, for every edge
e′ ∈ X it holds Γ(Aug(x∗ )) ∈ E(G(x∗ )).
From the definition of Aug(e′ ) for e′ ∈ X one can see that
all Aug(e′ ) have the same direction as e0 . Therefore, W =
{Aug(e′−N ), Aug(e′1−N ), . . . , Aug(e′−1 ), Aug(e′0 ), Aug(e′1 ),
. . . , Aug(e′N −1 ), Aug(e′N )} is the directed path in TeN0 ,
and we will call it augmenting path of y ∗ with respect
to x∗ . Γ(W ) is also a directed walk on G(x∗ ), which
can be decomposed into a simple directed path P and a
collection of k simple directed cycles C1 , C2 , . . . , Ck . Since
each simple cycle or path has at most n edges and W
has 2N + 1 edges, it holds l(W ) ≤ n + kn. On the other
Ln
+ n + 1. Then we obtain
hand, l(W ) = 2N + 1 =
σ(x∗ )T
L
. Further we would denote by c∗ (·) and l∗ (·)
k >
σ(x∗ )T
costs of cycles and paths in the residual network G(x∗ ).
For each cycle Ci we have c∗ (Ci ) ≥ σ(x∗ ) > 0 by Lemma
(2.1), while the cost of P is at least −L. Then using Lemma
(2.2) we have:
L
l∗ (W ) ≥ l∗ (P ) + kT σ(x∗ ) > −L +
T σ(x∗ ) = 0
σ(x∗ )T
We will now ”extract” flow from W in TeN0 . Let’s
redefine the numeration of arcs in W for convenience:
W = {w1 , w2 , . . . , w2N +1 }. This edges correspond to X =
′
′
{w1′ , w2′ , . . . , w2N
+1 }, where wi and wi have the same
′
orientation if wi ∈ D, and have the opposite orientation if
wi′ ∈ O. Hence extraction of flow from wi means decreasing
∗
∗
if wi′ ∈ O.
if wi′ ∈ D, and increasing yw
yw
i
i
Then similarly to the proof of Lemma 2.1, to keep the
balance in all the vertexes of W (except the start and the end,
since there are no balance constraints for them in GMNFN
e0 ),
we have to adjust the flow in the following way:
(
∗
yw
if wi′ ∈ D
′ − λ,
1
ỹw1′ =
(2)
∗
yw
if wi′ ∈ O
′ + λ,
1
(
Qi
∗
′
′
yw
if wi′ ∈ D
′ − λ
j=2 δ(vj , wi−1 , wi ),
i
ỹwi′ =
(3)
Qi
∗
′
′
yw′ + λ j=2 δ(vj , wi−1 , wi ), if wi′ ∈ O
i
for i = 2, 3, . . . , 2N + 1.
Obviously, there exist small enough λ > 0 such that
ỹe > x∗Γ(e) ≥ 0 ∀e ∈ D, and ỹe < x∗Γ(e) ≤ uΓ(e) ∀e ∈ O,
so the capacity constraints are satisfied for ỹ. (The balance
constraints are satisfied by the construction). So, ỹ is a
feasible solution of GMNFN
e0 . Now we explore how the total
cost changes after such transformation of the flow:
X
cΓ(e′ ) ye∗′ −
e′ ∈E(TeN0 )
=
X
cΓ(e′ ) ỹe′ =
e′ ∈E(TeN0 )
X
cΓ(e′ ) (ye∗′ − ỹe′ ) =
e′ ∈E(TeN0 )
=
X
cΓ(e′ ) λe′ −
e′ ∈D
=
X
e′ ∈D
=
2N
+1
X
i=1
c∗Γ(w ) λ
i
cΓ(e′ ) λe′ =
e′ ∈O
c∗Γ(e′ ) λe′ +
X
X
e′ ∈O
i
Y
j=2
c∗Γ(e′ ) λe′ =
X
c∗Γ(e′ ) λe′ =
e′ ∈W
δ(vj , wj−1 , wj ) = l(W )λ > 0
Here we used that c∗Γ(e′ ) = cΓ(e′ ) for e′ ∈ D and c∗Γ(e′ ) =
−cΓ(e′ ) for e′ ∈ O, that is obvious from the construction of
W, D, and O.
So we found the feasible solution of GMNFN
e0 with the
total cost less then of y ∗ . It means that y ∗ is not an optimal
solution of GMNFN
e0 , which leads us to the contradiction.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
The proved correctness of the Belief Propagation algorithms for General Min-Cost Network Flow problems may
serve as justification of applying these algorithms in practice
for real problems. The statement of GMNF problem is broad
enough, and thus many practical problems may fall under
this formulation, which means that these problems may be
solved correctly using BP algorithms.
The future research is required to determine the speed of
convergence of BP for this Generalized Min-Cost Network
Flow, since in our paper we have only proved that after
the finite iterations of the algorithms the answer will not
change and be the correct one. However, since σ(x∗ ) in 3.2
may be arbitrary small for some problems, the number of
iterations until the algorithm will give the correct answer may
be arbitrary big, and further analysis is needed to reasonably
bound the number of steps that should be done.
R EFERENCES
[1] M. J. Wainwright, M. I. Jordan et al., “Graphical models, exponential
families, and variational inference,” Foundations and Trends R in
Machine Learning, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 1–305, 2008.
[2] K. P. Murphy, Y. Weiss, and M. I. Jordan, “Loopy belief propagation
for approximate inference: An empirical study,” in Proceedings of the
Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. Morgan
Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999, pp. 467–475.
[3] J. Pearl, Reverend Bayes on inference engines: A distributed hierarchical approach. Cognitive Systems Laboratory, School of Engineering
and Applied Science, University of California, Los Angeles, 1982.
[4] J. S. Yedidia, W. T. Freeman, and Y. Weiss, “Understanding belief
propagation and its generalizations,” Exploring artificial intelligence
in the new millennium, vol. 8, pp. 236–239, 2003.
[5] V. Kolmogorov and M. J. Wainwright, “On the optimality of treereweighted max-product message-passing,” in Proceedings of the
Twenty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence.
AUAI Press, 2005, pp. 316–323.
[6] S. M. Aji and R. J. McEliece, “The generalized distributive law,” IEEE
transactions on Information Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 325–343, 2000.
[7] G. B. Horn, “Iterative decoding and pseudo-codewords,” Ph.D. dissertation, California Institute of Technology, 1999.
[8] M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and R. Zecchina, “Analytic and algorithmic
solution of random satisfiability problems,” Science, vol. 297, no.
5582, pp. 812–815, 2002.
[9] T. J. Richardson and R. L. Urbanke, “The capacity of low-density
parity-check codes under message-passing decoding,” IEEE Transactions on information theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 599–618, 2001.
[10] Y. Weiss and W. T. Freeman, “On the optimality of solutions of the
max-product belief-propagation algorithm in arbitrary graphs,” IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 736–744, 2001.
[11] D. Gamarnik, D. Shah, and Y. Wei, “Belief propagation for min-cost
network flow: Convergence and correctness,” Operations Research,
vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 410–428, 2012.
[12] E. Birmelé, R. Ferreira, R. Grossi, A. Marino, N. Pisanti, R. Rizzi,
and G. Sacomoto, “Optimal listing of cycles and st-paths in undirected
graphs,” in Proceedings of the twenty-fourth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied
Mathematics, 2013, pp. 1884–1896.
[13] M. Bayati, C. Borgs, J. Chayes, and R. Zecchina, “On the exactness
of the cavity method for weighted b-matchings on arbitrary graphs
and its relation to linear programs,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics:
Theory and Experiment, vol. 2008, no. 06, p. L06001, 2008.
[14] M. Bayati, D. Shah, and M. Sharma, “Max-product for maximum
weight matching: Convergence, correctness, and lp duality,” IEEE
Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1241–1251,
2008.
[15] S. Sanghavi, D. Malioutov, and A. S. Willsky, “Linear programming
analysis of loopy belief propagation for weighted matching,” in
Advances in neural information processing systems, 2008, pp. 1273–
1280.
| 8cs.DS
|
Neural Distributed Autoassociative
Memories: A Survey
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
Abstract
Introduction. Neural network models of autoassociative, distributed memory allow storage
and retrieval of many items (vectors) where the number of stored items can exceed the vector
dimension (the number of neurons in the network). This opens the possibility of a sublinear
time search (in the number of stored items) for approximate nearest neighbors among vectors
of high dimension.
The purpose of this paper is to review models of autoassociative, distributed memory
that can be naturally implemented by neural networks (mainly with local learning rules and
iterative dynamics based on information locally available to neurons).
Scope. The survey is focused mainly on the networks of Hopfield, Willshaw and Potts,
that have connections between pairs of neurons and operate on sparse binary vectors. We discuss not only autoassociative memory, but also the generalization properties of these networks. We also consider neural networks with higher-order connections and networks with a
bipartite graph structure for non-binary data with linear constraints.
Conclusions. In conclusion we discuss the relations to similarity search, advantages and
drawbacks of these techniques, and topics for further research. An interesting and still not
completely resolved question is whether neural autoassociative memories can search for approximate nearest neighbors faster than other index structures for similarity search, in particular for the case of very high dimensional vectors.
Keywords: distributed associative memory, sparse binary vector, Hopfield network,
Willshaw memory, Potts model, nearest neighbor, similarity search.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt188.02.005
This front page has been added to assist automated indexing.
The paper as published begins on the next page.
Please cite as:
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov.
Neural distributed autoassociative memories: A survey. Cybernetics and Computer
Engineering. 2017. N 2 (188). P. 5–35.
Информатика
и информационные технологии
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/kvt188.02.005
УДК 004.22 + 004.93'11
V.I. GRITSENKO1, Corresponding Member of NAS of Ukraine, Director,
e-mail: [email protected]
D.A. RACHKOVSKIJ 1, Dr (Engineering), Leading Researcher,
Dept. of Neural Information Processing Technologies,
e-mail: [email protected]
A.A. FROLOV2, Dr (Biology), Professor,
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science FEI,
e-mail: [email protected]
R. GAYLER3, PhD (Psychology), Independent Researcher,
e-mail: [email protected]
D. KLEYKO4 graduate student,
Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering,
e-mail: [email protected]
E. OSIPOV4 PhD (Informatics), Professor,
Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering,
e-mail: [email protected]
1
International Research and Training Center for Information Technologies
and Systems of the NAS of Ukraine and of Ministry of Education
and Science of Ukraine, ave. Acad. Glushkova, 40, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine
2
Technical University of Ostrava, 17 listopadu 15, 708 33 Ostrava-Poruba,
Czech Republic
3
Melbourne, VIC, Australia
4
Lulea University of Technology, 971 87 Lulea, Sweden
NEURAL DISTRIBUTED AUTOASSOCIATIVE MEMORIES: A SURVEY
Introduction. Neural network models of autoassociative, distributed memory allow storage
and retrieval of many items (vectors) where the number of stored items can exceed the vector
dimension (the number of neurons in the network). This opens the possibility of a sublinear
time search (in the number of stored items) for approximate nearest neighbors among vectors
of high dimension.
The purpose of this paper is to review models of autoassociative, distributed memory
that can be naturally implemented by neural networks (mainly with local learning rules and
iterative dynamics based on information locally available to neurons).
Scope. The survey is focused mainly on the networks of Hopfield, Willshaw and Potts,
that have connections between pairs of neurons and operate on sparse binary vectors. We
ã V.I. GRITSENKO, D.A. RACHKOVSKIJ, A.A. FROLOV, R. GAYLER, D. KLEYKO, E. OSIPOV, 2017
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
5
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
discuss not only autoassociative memory, but also the generalization properties of these
networks. We also consider neural networks with higher-order connections and networks
with a bipartite graph structure for non-binary data with linear constraints.
Conclusions. In conclusion we discuss the relations to similarity search, advantages
and drawbacks of these techniques, and topics for further research. An interesting and still
not completely resolved question is whether neural autoassociative memories can search for
approximate nearest neighbors faster than other index structures for similarity search, in
particular for the case of very high dimensional vectors.
Keywords: distributed associative memory, sparse binary vector, Hopfield network, Willshaw
memory, Potts model, nearest neighbor, similarity search.
INTRODUCTION
In this paper, we review some artificial neural network variants of distributed
autoassociative memories (denoted by Neural Associative Memory, NAM) [1–
159].
Varieties of associative memory [93] (or content addressable memory) can
be considered as index structures performing some types of similarity search. In
autoassociative memory, the output is the word of memory, most similar to the
key at the input. We restrict our initial attention to systems where the key and
memory words are binary vectors. Therefore, autoassociative memory answers
nearest neighbor queries for binary vectors.
In distributed memory, different vectors (items to be stored) are stored in
shared memory cells. That is, each item to be stored consists of a pattern of
activation across (potentially) all the memory cells of the system and each
memory cell of the system contributes to the storage and recall of many
(potentially all) stored items. Some of types of distributed memory have attractive properties of parallelism, resistance to noise and malfunctions, etc. However,
exactly correct answers to the nearest neighbor queries from such memories are
not guaranteed, especially when too many vectors are stored in the memory.
Neurobiologically plausible variants of distributed memory can be represented
as artificial neural networks. These typically perform one-shot memorization of
vectors by a local learning rule modifying connection weights and retrieve a
memory vector in response to a query vector by an iterative procedure of activity
propagation between neurons via their connections.
In the first Section, we briefly introduce Hebb's theory of brain functioning
based on cell assemblies because it has influenced many models of NAM. Then
we introduce a generic scheme of NAMs and their characteristics (discussed in
more details in the other sections). The following three Sections discuss the
widespread matrix-type NAMs (where each pair of neurons is connected by two
symmetric connections) of Hopfield, Willshaw, and Potts that work best with
sparse binary vectors. The next Section is devoted to the function of
generalization, which differs from the function of autoassociative memory and
emerges in some NAMs. The following Section discusses NAMs with higherorder connections (more than two neurons have a connection) and NAMs
without connections. Then some recent NAMs with a bipartite graph structure
are considered. The last Section provides discussion and concludes the paper.
6
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
CELL ASSEMBLIES AND GENERIC NAM
Hebb's paradigm of cell assemblies. According to Hebb [65], nerve cells of the
brain are densely interconnected by excitatory connections, forming a neural
network. Each neuron determines its membrane potential as the sum of other
active neurons' outputs weighted by connection weights. A neuron becomes
active if this potential (the input sum) exceeds the threshold value. During
network functioning, connection weights between simultaneously active neurons
(encoding various items) are increased (the Hebbian learning rule). This results
in organization of neurons into cell assemblies — groups of nerve cells most
often active together and consequently mutually excited by connection weights
between neurons in the assembly. At the same time, the process of increased
connection within assemblies leads to mutual segregation of assemblies. When a
sufficient part of a cell assembly is activated, the assembly becomes active as a
whole because of the strong excitatory connection weights between the cells
within the assembly.
Cell assemblies may be regarded as memorized representations of items
encoded by the distributed patterns of active neurons. The process of assembly
activation by a fragment of the memorized item may be interpreted as the
process of pattern completion or the associative retrieval of similar stored
information when provided with a partial or distorted version of the memorized
item.
Hebb's theory of brain functioning — interpretation of various mental
phenomena in terms of cell assemblies — has turned out to be one of the most
profound and generative approaches to brain modeling and has influenced the
work of many researchers in the fields of artificial intelligence, cognitive
psychology, modeling of neural structures, and neurophysiology (see also
reviews in [39, 40, 54, 75, 98, 104, 120, 121, 134]).
A generic scheme and characteristics of NAMs. Let us introduce a generic
model of the NAM type, inspired by Hebb's paradigm, that will be elaborated in
the sections below devoted to specific NAMs. We mainly consider NAMs of the
distributed and matrix-type, which are fully connected networks of binary
neurons (but see Sections "NAMs with Higher-Order Connections and without
Connections", "NAMs with a Bipartite Graph Structure for Nonbinary Data with
Constraints" for other NAM types). Each of the neurons (their number is D )
represents a component of the binary vector z . That is, each of the D neurons
can be in the state 0 or 1. Each pair of neurons has two mutual connections (one
in each direction). The elements of the connection matrix W( D ´ D) represent
the weights of all these connections. In the learning mode, the vectors y from
the training or memory set (which we call the "base") are "stored" (encoded or
memorized) in the matrix W by using some learning rule that changes the
values of wij (initially each wij is usually zero).
In the retrieval mode, an input binary vector x (probe or key or query
vector) is fed to the network by activation of its neurons: z = x . The input sum
of the i -th neuron
si = å j =1, D wij z j
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
7
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
is calculated. The neuron state is determined as
zi (t + 1) = 1 (active) for si (t ) ³ Ti (t )
and
zi (t + 1) = 0 (inactive) for si (t ) < Ti (t ) ; Ti
is the value of the neuron threshold.
For parallel (synchronous) network dynamics, the input sums and the states
of all D neurons are calculated (updated) at each step t of iterative retrieval.
For sequential (asynchronous) dynamics, zi is calculated for one neuron i ,
selected randomly. For simplicity, let us consider random selection without
replacement, and one step of the asynchronous dynamics to consist of update of
the states of all D neurons.
The parameters W and T are set so that after a single, or several, steps of
dynamics the state of the network (neurons) reaches a stable state (typically, the
state vector does not change with t , but cyclic state changes are also considered
as "stable"). At the stable state, z is the output of the network.
The query vector x is usually a modified version of one of the stored
vectors y . In the literature, this might be referred to as a noisy, corrupted, or
distorted version of a vector. While the number of stored vectors is not too high,
the output z is the stored y closest to x (in terms of dot product
simdot (x, y ) º á x, y ñ ).
That is, z is the base vector y with the maximum value of á x, y ñ . In this
case, NAM returns the (exact) nearest neighbor in terms of simdot . For binary
vectors with the same number of unit (i.e. with value equal to 1) components,
this is equivalent to the nearest neighbor by the Hamming distance ( dist Ham ).
The time complexity (runtime) of one step of the network dynamics is
O( D 2 ) . Thus, if a NAM can be constructed that stores a base of N > D vectors
so that they can be successfully retrieved from their distorted versions, then the
retrieval time via the NAM could be less than the O( DN ) time required for
linear search (i.e. the sequential comparison of all base vectors y to x ). Since
the memory complexity of this NAM type is O( D 2 ) , as D increases, one can
expect an increasing in the size N of the bases that could be stored and retrieved
by NAM.
Unfortunately, the vector at the NAM output may not be the nearest
neighbor of the query vector, and possibly not even a vector of the base. (Note
that if one was not concerned with biological plausibility, one can quickly check
whether the output vector is in the base set by using a hash table to store all base
vectors.) In some NAMs, it is only possible to store many fewer vectors N than
D , with high probability of accurate retrieval, especially if the query vectors are
quite dissimilar to the base vectors.
For NAM analysis, base vectors are typically selected randomly
independently from some distribution of binary vectors (e.g., vectors with the
probability p of 1-components equal to 1/2, or vector with pD 1-components,
8
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
for some p from interval (0,1)). The assumption of independence simplifies
analytical approaches, but is likely unrealistic for real applications of NAMs.
The query vectors are typically generated by as modifications of the base
vectors. Distortion by deletion randomly changes some of the 1s to 0s (the
remaining components are guaranteed to agree). A more complex distortion by
noise randomly changes some 1s to 0s, and some 0s to 1s while (exactly or
approximately) preserving the total number of 1s.
For a random binary vector of dimension D with the probability p of a
component to be 1, the Shannon entropy
H = Dh( p) ,
Where
h( p) = - p log p - (1 - p)log(1 - p) .
For D >> 1 , a random vector with pD of 1s has approximately the same
entropy. The entropy of N vectors is NDh( p) . When N vectors are stored in
NAM, the entropy per connection is [40, 41].
a = NDh( p) / D 2 = Nh( p) / D .
Knowing h( p) , it is easy to determine N for a given a .
When too many vectors are stored, NAM becomes overloaded and the
probability of accurate retrieval drops (even to 0). The value of a for which a
NAM still works reliably depends on the mode of its use (in addition to the
NAM design and distributions of base and query vectors). The mode where the
undistorted stored base vectors are still stable NAM states (or stable states differ
by few components from the intended base vectors), has the largest value of a .
(We denote the largest value of a for this mode as "critical", a crit , and the
corresponding N as N crit .) For a > a crit the stored vectors become unstable.
Note that checking if an input vector is stable does not allow one to extract
information from the NAM, since vectors not stored can also be stable.
The information (in the Shannon information-theoretic sense) that can be
extracted from a NAM is determined by the information efficiency (per connection) E . This quantity is bounded above by some specific a (the entropy per
connection that still permits information extraction), which in its turn is bounded
above by a crit . A NAM may work in recognition or correction mode. In
recognition mode, the NAM distinguishes whether the input (query) vector is
from the base or not, yielding extracted information quantified by Erecog .
When NAM answers the nearest neighbor queries (correction mode),
information quantified by Ecorr is extracted from the NAM by correction
(completion) of the distorted query vectors. The more distorted the base vector
used as the query at the NAM input, the more information Ecorr is extracted from
the NAM (provided that the intended base vector is sufficiently accurately
retrieved). However, more distorted input vectors lower the value of a corr at
which the NAM is still able to retrieve the correct base vectors, and so lowers
Ecorr (which is constrained to be less than a corr ). We refer to these informationISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
9
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
theoretic properties of NAMs as their information characteristics.
Let us now consider specific variants of the generic NAM. Hereafter we use
the terms "NAM" and "(neural) network" interchangeably.
HOPFIELD NAMs
Hopfield networks with dense vectors. In the Hopfield NAM, "dense" random
binary vectors (with the components from {0,1} with the probability p = 1 / 2 of
1) are used [68]. The learning procedure forms a symmetric matrix W of
connection weights with positive and negative elements. The connection matrix
is constructed by successively storing each of the base vectors y according to
the Hopfield learning rule:
wij = wij + ( yi - q)( y j - q)
with parameter q = p = 1 / 2 ; wii = 0 . (For brevity, we use the same name for
generalization of this rule with q < 1 / 2 , though Hopfield did not propose it,
Subsection "Hopfield networks with sparse vectors").
The dynamics in [68] is sequential (in many subsequent studies and
implementations it is parallel) with the threshold T = 0 . It was shown [68] that
each neuron state update decreases the energy function
-(1 / 2) å i , j =1, D zi wij z j ,
so that a (local) minimum of energy is eventually reached and such a network
comes into a stable activation state.
As D ® ¥ , various methods of analysis and approximation of experimental
(modeling) data obtain a crit » 0.14 [68, 8, 5, 71, 35] which gives N crit » 0.14 D
since h(1 / 2) = 1 . Note that similar values of a crit are achieved at rather small
finite D . For rigorous proofs of (smaller) a crit see refs in [107].
max
for distortion by noise, 0.092 was obtained by the method of
As for Ecorr
approximate dynamical equations of the mean field [71], and 0.095 by
approximating the experiments to D ® ¥ [35].
By the coding theory methods in [112] it was shown that asymptotically (as
D ® ¥ ) it is possible to retrieve (with probability approaching 1) exact base
vectors with query vectors distorted by noise (so that their dist Ham < D / 2 from
the base vectors), for N = D / (2ln D) stored base vectors if non-retrieval of
some is permitted. If one requires the exact retrieval of all stored base vectors,
the maximum number of vectors which can be stored decreases to
N = D / (4ln D) . These values of N were shown to be the lower and upper
bounds in [25, 20]. Note that in [47] a crit = 2 was obtained for "optimal" W
(obtained by a non-Hebbian learning rule); a pseudoinverse rule (e.g. [125, 140])
gives a crit = 1 .
For correlated base vectors, the storage capacity N crit depends on the
structure of the correlation. When the base vectors are generated by a onedimensional Markov chain [107], N crit is somewhat higher than it is for
10
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
independent vectors. This and other correlation models were considered in [108].
Hopfield networks with sparse vectors. Hopfield NAMs operating with
sparse vectors p < 1 / 2 appeared to have better information characteristics [154]
(see also Sections "Willshaw NAMs", "Potts NAMs") than those operating with
dense vectors ( p = 1 / 2 ). For example, they attain values N > D .
In the usual Hopfield NAM and learning rule (with q = p = 1 / 2 and
threshold T = 0 ) the number of active neurons is kept near D / 2 by the balance
of negative and positive connections in W . Using the Hopfield rule with
q = p < 1 / 2 one can not set T = 0 . This is especially evident for the Hebb
learning rule (which we obtain from the Hopfield rule by setting q = 0 ). All
connections become non-negative, and T = 0 eventually activates all neurons.
Similar behavior is demonstrated by the Hopfield NAM and learning rule with
q = p < 1 / 2 . The problem of network activity control (i.e. maintaining some
average activity level chosen by the designer) can be solved by applying an
appropriate uniform activation bias to all neurons [9, 21]. This is achieved by
setting an appropriate positive value of the time-varying threshold T (t ) [21] to
ensure, for example, pD < D / 2 active neurons (to match pD in the stored
vectors) for parallel dynamics.
Note that the Hopfield rule with q = p < 1 / 2 provides better information
characteristics than the pure Hebb rule with q = 0 [41, 35]. However, the Hebb
rule requires modification of only ( pD)2 connections per vector, whereas the
Hopfield rule modifies all connections per vector.
As D ® ¥ and p ® 0 ( pD >> 1 , and often p ~ ln D / D ) the theoretical
analysis (e.g., [154, 41, 34] and others) gives
a crit = (log e) / 2 = 1 / (2ln 2) » 0.72
for the Hopfield rule with q = p , the Hebb rule, and the "optimal" W [47]. In
[34] they use a scaled sparseness parameter e = (ln p) -1/2 to investigate
max
max
. For e << 1 they obtained a crit
» 0.72 . However
convergence of a crit to a crit
for e = 0.1 (corresponding to p = 10-8 and to D > 109 ), a crit = 0.43 only.
max
In [122] it was shown that Erecog
= 1 / (4ln 2) » 0.36 (by the impractical
exhaustive enumeration procedure of checking that all vectors of the base are
stable and all other vectors with the same number of 1-components are not
stable). This empirical estimate coincides with the estimate [41]. For retrieval by
a single step of dynamics,
max
Ecorr
= 1 / (8ln 2) » 0.18
for distortion by deletion of half the 1-components of a base vector [40, 41, 119,
146].
Let us note again, all these results are obtained for D ® ¥ and p ® 0 . For
these conditions, multi-step retrieval (the usual mode of NAM retrieval as
explained in Subsection "A generic scheme and characteristics of NAMs") is not
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
11
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
required since NAM reaches a stable state after a single step. In terms of N ,
since h( p) ® 0 for p ® 0 , it follows that N >> D , that is
N crit = a crit D / h ( p ) ® ¥
much faster than D ® ¥ .
The same is valid for N corresponding to E .
In the experiments [146], for the Hebb rule and multi-step retrieval Ecorr
values up to 0.09 were obtained. Detailed studies of the information
characteristics of the finite- and infinite-dimensional networks with the Hopfield
rule, can be found in [34, 35]. Different degrees of distortion by noise for vectors
with pD unit components were used. The dynamic threshold ensured pD
active neurons at each step of the parallel dynamics. It was shown [35] that with
this choice of threshold the stable states are static (some vector) or cycles of
length 2 (two alternating vectors on adjacent steps of the dynamics). (This is the
same behavior as for the fixed static threshold and is valid for all networks with
symmetric connections.) It has been demonstrated experimentally [35] that even
if after the first step of dynamics
simdot (y , z ) < simdot (y , x )
(where y is the correct base vector, z is the network state, and x is the
distorted input), the correct base vector can sometimes be retrieved by the
subsequent steps of the dynamics. Conversely, increasing simdot (y , z ) at the first
step of the dynamics does not guarantee correct retrieval [5]. These results apply
to both the dense and sparse vector cases. The study [35] used analytical
methods developed for the dense Hopfield network and adapted for sparse
vectors, including the statistical neurodynamics (SN) [5, 34], the replica method
(RM) [8], and the single step method (SS) [80].
All these analytical methods rather poorly predicted the behavior of finite
networks for highly sparse vectors, at least for the parallel dynamics studied.
(Note that all these methods (SN, RM, SS) provide accurate results for D ® ¥
and p ® 0 , where retrieval by a single step of dynamics is enough.) Empirical
experimentation avoids the shortcomings of these analytical methods by directly
simulating the behavior of the networks. These simulations allow a corr and
information efficiency, Ecorr , to be estimated as a functions of p, D and the level
of noise in the input vectors. The value of Ecorr monotonically increases as D
increases for a constant p . For p = 0.001 – 0.01, which corresponds to the
activity level of neurons in the brain, the maximum value of Ecorr » 0.205 was
obtained by approximating experimental results to the case D ® ¥ [35] (higher
max
than Ecorr
» 0.18 for p ® 0 ).
In [38] the time of retrieval in the Hopfield network was investigated (using
the number of retrieval steps observed in simulation experiments; this number
somewhat increases with D ). They conclude that for random vectors with small
p , large D , and large N , Hopfield networks may be faster than some other
algorithms (e.g., the inverted index) for approximate and exact nearest neighbor
12
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
querying.
An increase in the number N crit of stable states corresponding to the stored
vectors proportional to ( D / ln D) 2 for p ~ ln D / D is shown asymptotically in
[4] (although non-rigorously, see also [34]). Note, this result also follows from
N = a D / h( p) by approximating h( p) » - p log p for small enough p
( - ln p >> 1 ).
In [67] they give a rigorous analysis of a Hopfield network variant (neurons
are divided into parts, see Section "Potts NAMs"), with the Hebb learning rule
and p slightly less than ln D / D , for retrieval by a single step of parallel
dynamics with fixed T . The lower and upper bounds of N were obtained for
which the memory vectors are stable states (with probability approaching 1 as
D ® ¥ ), and can also be exactly retrieved from query vectors distorted by
noise. The lower and upper bounds of N found in [67] are of the same order as
those found in [4]. For this mode of network operation, if we approximate the
number of retrieval steps as ln D , we may estimate speed-up as D / (ln D)3
relative to linear search (see Subsection "A generic scheme and characteristics of
NAMs").
For both dense and sparse vectors, the NAM capacity N max grows with
increasing D . Also, in order to maintain an adequate information content for a
sparse vector ( Dh( p) for h( p) << 1 ), it is necessary to have a sufficiently high
D . The number of connections grows as D squared (because Hopfield
networks are fully connected), which is unattainable even on modern computers
at D of millions. Besides, the neurobiologically plausible number of
connections per neuron is on the order of 10,000. Therefore, the development of
"diluted" networks that perform NAM functions without being fully connected is
attractive, e.g. [105, 150, 151, 41, 142]. This partial connectivity can be used to
reduce the memory complexity of NAM from quadratic to linear in D [98, 99].
WILLSHAW NAMs
Willshaw networks with sparse vectors. NAMs with binary connections from
{0,1} are promising since they require only one bit per connection. Such
networks were proposed both in heteroassociative [157] and autoassociative
versions (e.g. [118, 156, 16, 152, 49, 115, 119, 122, 24, 48, 41, 42, 43, 44, 81]).
The learning rule (let's call it the Willshaw rule) becomes:
wij = wij Ú ( yi Ù y j ) ,
where Ú is disjunction, Ù is conjunction. Various strategies for threshold
setting can be used, e.g., setting threshold T to ensure pD active neurons, as in
Subsection "Hopfield networks with sparse vectors".
Note that this NAM can not work with dense vectors, since storing only a
small number of dense vectors will set almost all the connection weights to 1.
Moreover, for the same reason, the Willshaw networks (unlike the Hopfield
networks) cease to work at any constant p and a as D ® ¥ . The number N
of random binary vectors able to be stored and retrieved in the Willshaw NAM
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
13
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
grows with decreasing vector density. Even for not very large networks and not
very sparse vectors ( p ~ D / D ), N can exceed D (e.g. D = 4096 allowed
storage and retrieval of up to N = 7000 vectors distorted by noise in the
experiments of [16]). The particular N values reached (for D and p fixed)
vary depending on the degree of the query vector distortion and on the desired
probability of retrieval.
The maximum theoretical a crit = ln 2 » 0.69 is reached as D ® ¥ for
p ~ ln D / D [40, 119, 41]. In [122] they obtained
max
Erecog
= ln 2 / 2 » 0.346
(using a computationally expensive exhaustive enumeration procedure). In [42,
max
43] the same a crit and Erecog
were obtained analytically for the sparseness
parameter b = log(1 / p) / ( pD) equal to 1, i.е. for pD somewhat less than
log D . (The probability of a connection to be modified after storing N vectors
is
1 - (1 - p 2 ) N
» 1 - exp( - Np 2 )
= 1 - exp( -a Dp 2 / h( p))
= 1 - exp( -a p log(1 / p) / ( b h( p))) » 1 - exp( -a / b ) <1 (we used p ® 0 ); thus
the network can be analyzed for fixed a and b at D ® ¥ .) The same upper
bound of E is given as the maximum entropy of W learnt by the Willshaw
rule. In [119] the efficiency
max
Ecorr
= ln 2 / 4 » 0.173
was theoretically shown for single-step (as well as multi-step) retrieval and
distortion by deletion.
For multi-step retrieval in finite Willshaw NAMs (with distortion by
deletion) Ecorr up to 0.19 (at D = 20000) was obtained experimentally in [146].
Experiments in [146, 44] show that in the Willshaw NAM (unlike the Hopfield
NAM), the values a corr and Ecorr for not too large D are higher than for D ® ¥
(see also [42]). Note that the quality of retrieval in the Willshaw NAM is higher
than in the Hopfield NAM; the retrieved vectors more often coincide exactly
with the stored vectors of the base.
From the detailed analytical and experimental study of the values of a corr in
[44] (at various levels of sparsely, parameterized as b , degrees of distortion by
noise, and D up to 100000), it was found that Ecorr » 0.13 per connection can be
reached in the experiments (for small networks, N = 640, pD = 20, b = 0.25 ).
It was also shown that the results of the analytical methods SS [80] and GR [48]
are far from the experimental results (in most cases, worse than them). Due to
the connections being binary, the efficiency per bit of connection implemented
in computer memory is higher than that for the Hopfield network (where
Ecorr » 0.205 per connection [41]).
A review of NAM studies in [81] concludes that for Willshaw networks
having connection matrix W with probability of a nonzero element close to 0 or
1, compression of W improves information characteristics compared with the
14
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
usual uncompressed Willshaw NAM. Such compressed W are obtained when
the base vectors have the number of 1s sublogarithmic or superlogarithmic in
D . Their comparison of the retrieval time in compressed Willshaw networks
and the inverted index has shown the advantage of the inverted index for most
parameters.
An analytical and experimental comparison of the Willshaw, the GB
(Subsection "Willshaw-Potts network"), and the Hopfield networks (with the
Hebb rule [4]) for vectors with p of the order of ln D / D and distortion by
deletion was carried out in [59]. They investigate single-step retrieval
theoretically (asymptotically, for D ® ¥ with probability approaching 1). For
all models, the lower bound of N of the order ( D / ln D) 2 is obtained, and for
the Willshaw network the matching upper bound is shown. In experiments, the
results are worse for a fixed threshold than for a variable threshold. The
Hopfield network performed worse, in terms of empirical probability of retrieval
versus N , compared with the other NAMs, probably because of the non-optimal
Hebb learning rule and non-optimal threshold selection.
For the diluted Willshaw networks [24, 6, 41, 99] the optimal pD
(providing approximately the same capacity N ) is higher than for the fully
connected networks.
Willshaw networks in the index structures for nearest neighbor search. In
[159] the base of binary sparse vectors is divided into disjoint sets (of the same
cardinality) and each is stored in a Willshaw NAM with its own W . When the
query vector x is input, simdot (x, Wx) is calculated for the matrices W of all
sets, and the vectors of sets with the maximum similarity are used as the nearest
neighbor candidates (verified by linear search). Analysis and experiments for
bases of random vectors with small random distortions of query vectors showed
that up to a certain number of vectors in each network the nearest neighbor is
found with a high probability (in experiments, without error) and faster than by
linear search only. If this number of vectors per network is exceeded, both the
probability of finding an incorrect nearest neighbor and its distance to the correct
vector increase. A somewhat lower speedup relative to linear search is shown for
real, nonrandom data, versus synthetic, random data. In [60] similar results were
obtained analytically (asymptotically for D ® ¥ and error probability
approaching zero) and experimentally for bases of sparse and dense random
vectors (for the Hopfield rule).
POTTS NAMs
Potts networks. The NAM from [77] can be considered as a network of neurons
that are divided into non-overlapping parts ("columns"), with d neurons in each
column and only one active neuron in the state z = d - 1 , for the remaining
column neurons z = -1 . That is, the sum of activations over all the neurons is
zero in each column. The Hebb rule is used for learning.
For the more convenient version of this model with the neurons having the
states from {0,1} and single active neuron per column, the Hopfield rule is used.
The connection matrix W for the entire network is constructed so that wij = 0
for neurons i and j in the same column (this implies that wii = 0 ). That is, the
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
15
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
network is structured as a multipartite graph. Network dynamics (parallel or
sequential) activates the one neuron in each column with the maximum input
sum s (one of these neurons is randomly activated for neurons with equal s ,
but see the GB network below).
For the number of columns D , the value of N crit / D of the Potts network
was estimated by [77] to be d (d - 1) / 2 times more than 0.14 (i.e., a crit for the
Hopfield network with p = 1 / 2 ). However, to approximate the number of
connections in the Hopfield network, the Potts network must have D / d
columns. Note also that one "Potts vector" contains only ( D / d )log d bits of
information [79].
The Potts network with parallel and sequential dynamics, and with singlestep and multi-step retrieval was analytically explored in [109]. For exact
retrieval (asymptotically, as D ® ¥ , with probability approaching 1), the upper
and lower bounds of N were estimated both for the mode of querying with
stable stored vectors and for the correction mode querying with distorted query
vectors. In both cases,
N = cD / ln D ,
where the constant c increases quadratically in d , but with different c
depending on the degree of distortion and the desired probability of state to be
stable or vector to be retrieved.
Willshaw-Potts network. For binary connections with the Willshaw learning
rule, the Potts network becomes the Willshaw-Potts network [79]. When a vector
is stored, a clique (a complete subgraph) is created in the connection graph. As
for the Hopfield network, only static stable states or cycles of length 2 were
experimentally observed for parallel dynamics. According to [79], the
information characteristics of this network are close to the Willshaw network at
the same vector sparsity. Since the information content of Willshaw-Potts
vectors is low, the N crit is higher than for the Willshaw network.
This network was rediscovered as the GB network in [58] with various
modifications [3, 59] and hardware implementations (for example, [117] with
non-binary connections). The GB network is oriented for exact retrieval of
vectors with distortion by deletion (columns without values activate all neurons).
The peculiarities of the GB network include: connections of neurons with
themselves; the possibility for several neurons in a column (with the maximum
input sum) to be in the active state; the contribution from each column to the
input sum of a neuron is not more than 1; various options for threshold
management; the possibility of working with vectors having all zero components
in some columns, etc. A theoretical GB analysis for single-step retrieval, as well
as an experimental comparison with the Hopfield and the Willshaw networks for
multi-step retrieval is given in [59], see also Subsection "Willshaw networks
with sparse vectors".
Processing of realistic data. To represent arbitrary binary vectors in the
Potts network, they are divided into segments of dimension log d and each
segment is encoded by the activation of one neuron of its d -dimensional
column [97]. Components of integer vectors can be represented in a similar way.
Simulated data are typically generated as independent random samples. This
16
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
ensures that the vectors to be stored are very nearly equally and maximally
dissimilar. However, data generated from situations in the world is very unlikely
to be so neatly distributed. When working with (unevenly distributed) real data,
NAM is used non-optimally (many connections are not modified, others are
"oversaturated"). To overcome this in the GB network, a free column neuron is
allocated when the number of connections of a neuron (encoding some value)
exceeds the threshold [19]. During retrieval, all column neurons that encode a
certain value are activated.
For better balancing the number of connections, in [64] the number of
neurons in the column allocated to represent a vector component is proportional
to the frequency of its 1-value in the vectors of the base. During storage, the
various neurons representing the component are activated in turn. The authors of
[64] also propose an algorithm for finding (with a high probability) all vectors of
the base closest to the query vector distorted by deletion; the algorithm often
significantly reduces the number of required queries.
GENERALIZATION IN NAMs
The Hebbian learning in matrix-type distributed memories naturally builds a
kind of correlation matrix where the frequencies of joint occurrence of active
neurons are accumulated in the updated connection weights. The neural
assemblies thus formed in the network may have a complex internal structure
reflecting the similarity structure of stored data. This structure can be revealed as
stable states of the network — in the general case, different from the stored data
vectors. That is, it is possible for vectors retrieved from a network to not be
identical to any of the vectors stored in the network (which is generally
undesirable).
Similarity preserving binary vectors. Similarity of patterns of active
neurons (represented as binary vectors) are assumed to reflect the similarity of
items (of various complexity and generality) they encode. The similarity value is
measured in terms of the number or fraction of common active neurons (or
overlap, i.e. normalized dot product of the representing binary vectors).
Moreover, the similarity "content" is available as the identities of common active
neurons (the IDs of the common 1-components of the representing binary
vectors).
Note that such data representation schemes by similarity preserving binary
vectors have been developed for objects represented by various data types,
mainly for (feature) vectors (see survey in [131]), but also for structured data
types such as sequences [102, 72, 85,86] and graphs [127, 128, 148, 136, 62,
134]. A significant part of this research is developed in the framework of
distributed representations [45, 76, 106, 126, 89], including binary sparse
distributed representations [102, 98, 103, 127, 128, 113, 114, 137, 138, 139, 148,
135, 136, 61, 134, 129, 130, 131, 132, 31, 33] and dense distributed representations [75, 76] (see [82, 84, 87, 88, 83] for examples of their applications).
Complex internal structure of cell assemblies for graded connections.
When binary vectors reflecting similarity of real objects are stored in a NAM by
variants of the Hebb (or Hopfield) rule, the weights of connections between the
neurons frequently activated together will be greater than the mean value of all
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
17
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
the weights. On the other hand, rare combinations of active neurons will have
smaller weights. Thus, neuron assemblies (cell assemblies in terms of Hebb
[65]) formed in the network may have a very complicated structure. Hebb and
Milner introduced the notions of "cores" and "fringes" ([65] pp. 126–134; for
more recent research see [101]) to characterize qualitatively such complex
internal structure of assemblies.
The notions of core (kernel, nucleus) and fringe (halo) of assemblies have
attracted attention to the function of assemblies distinct from the function of
associative memory. This different function is not just memorization of
individual activity patterns (vectors), but emergence of some generalized
internal representations, that were not explicitly presented to the network as
vectors for memorization.
Some assembly cores may correspond to "prototypes" representing subsets
of attributes (encoded by the active neurons represented by the 1-components of
the corresponding vectors) often present together in some input vectors. Note
that some of these subsets of components/attributes may never be present in any
single vector. Stronger cores, corresponding to stable combinations of a small
number of typical attributes present in many vectors employed for learning, may
correspond to some more abstract or general object category (class). Cores
formed by more attributes may represent more specific categories, or object
prototypes. However, object tokens (category instances) may also have strong
cores if they were often presented to the network for learning. Note that some
mechanisms may exist to prevent repeated learning of vectors that are already
"familiar" to the network. Also, the rate of weight modification may vary based
on the "importance" of the input vector.
The representations of real objects have different degrees of similarity with
each other. Similarities in various combinations of features often form different
hierarchies of similarities that reflect hierarchies of categories of different
degrees of generalization (object — class of objects — a more general class,
etc.). So, assemblies formed in the network (cores and fringes of different
"strength") may have a complex and rich hierarchical structure, with multiple
overlapping hierarchies reflecting the structure of different contents and values
of similarity implicitly present in the base of vectors used for the unsupervised
network learning by the employed variant of the Hebb rule. Thus, many types of
the category-based hierarchies (also known as generalization or classification or
type-token hierarchies) may naturally emerge in the internal structure of
assemblies formed in a single assembly neural network (NAM).
Complex internal structure of a neural assembly allows a virtually
continuous variety of hierarchical transitions. To reveal various types of
categories and prototypes and instances formed in the network, the
corresponding assemblies should be activated. To activate only stronger cores,
higher values of threshold should be used. Lower threshold values may
additionally activate fringes.
Research of generalization function in NAMs. Additional stable states that
emerge in NAM after memorizing random base vectors and do not coincide with
the base vectors are known as false or spurious states or memories, e.g., [69,
155]. In [155] they regarded the emergence of spurious attractors in the Hopfield
networks as a side effect of the main function of distributed NAMs, consisting
18
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
not in memorizing individual patterns, but in formation of prototypes. Such an
interpretation is close to the earlier work [13, 11, 12] that considered formation
of concepts, prototypes, and taxonomic hierarchies as a natural generalization of
correlated patterns memorized in a distributed memory.
Research of hierarchically correlated patterns and states in Hopfield
networks has been initiated by physicists who studied the "ultrametric"
organization of ground states in spin-glasses (e.g., [123, 32, 63]; see also [6] and
its references). While these earlier works required explicit representation of
patterns at various hierarchical levels to be used in the learning rule, more
neurobiologically plausible and practical Hebb and Hopfield rules applied to
(hierarchically) correlated sparse binary patterns themselves (obtained with
some simple correlation model) were considered, e.g., in [153, 66]. [153]
theoretically showed "natural" formation of stable cores and fringes as well as
traveling through different levels of hierarchies by uniform changing of the
threshold. More complex probabilistic neuron dynamics and threshold control
expressing neuronal fatigue was modeled in [66]. Dynamics of transitions
between stable memory states that models human free recall data and can also be
used with hierarchically organized data was considered in [143]. The "neurowindow" approach of [74] may be considered as using multiple thresholds to
activate cores or fringes. Revealing the stable states corresponding to emergent
assemblies is used for data mining (binary factor analysis) in [36, 37].
Generalization in NAMS with binary connections. The Willshaw learning
rule does not form assemblies with the complex internal structure needed for
generalization functions, such as emergence of generalization (type-token)
hierarchies. The Willshaw learning rule causes the connectivity of an assembly
(corresponding to a vector) to become full after a single learning act (vector
storage) and not change thereafter. To preserve the capability of forming
assemblies with a non-uniform connectivity in NAMs with binary connections, a
stochastic analogue of the Hebbian learning rule for binary connections was
proposed in [100, 98]:
wij = wij Ú ( yi Ù y j Ù xij ) ,
where xij is a binary random variable equal to 1 with the probability that
determines the learning rate.
The connectivity value for some set of neurons is determined here by the
number of their 1-weight connections. Neurons that have more than some
fraction of 1-weight connections with the other neurons of the same assembly
may be attributed to the core part of the assembly.
In [15] they experimentally studied formation of assemblies with cores and
fringes using the above mentioned "stochastic Willshaw" rule ( D = 4096,
pD = 120 – 200, about 60 neurons in the core and 60–140 neurons in the
fringe). Tests have been performed on retrieving a core by its part; a core and its
full fringe by the core and a part of the fringe (the most difficult test); and, a core
by a part of its fringe. As expected, experiments with correlated base vectors
have shown a substantial decrease of storage capacity compared to random
independent vectors. A special learning rule was proposed to increase the
stability of fringes.
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
19
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
Formation of prototypes with the stochastic Willshaw rule was also
investigated in [7, 23]; a model of paired-associate learning in humans is
considered in [141].
Generalization in modular NAMs. A modular structure of neural networks
where the Hebb assemblies are formed inside the modules was proposed and
developed in [50–56]. The modular assembly neural network is intended for
recognition of a limited number of classes. The network is artificially partitioned
into several modules (sub-networks) according to the number of classes that the
network is required to recognize. Each module network is full-connected,
connections are graded. The features extracted from all objects of a certain class
are encoded into activation of the patterns of neurons within the corresponding
sub-network. After learning, the Hebb assemblies are formed in each module
network. In this modular structure, the network acquires the capability to
generalize the description of each class within the corresponding module (subnetwork), i.e. separately and completely independently from all other classes. In
[56] it was shown that the number of connections in each module can be reduced
without loss of the recognition capability.
NAMs WITH HIGHER-ORDER CONNECTIONS
AND WITHOUT CONNECTIONS
Neural networks in the previous sections have connections of order n = 2 (а
connection is between two neurons). In this section we consider values of n
other than 2, for the NAMs with the structure of the Hopfield network (unlike
Section "Hopfield NAMs" where we only considered the case n = 2 ).
Neural networks with higher-order connections. In the higher-order (order
n > 2 ) generalization of the Hopfield network, n neurons are connected by
single connection instead of just two (for example, [124, 17, 46, 1, 70, 94, 26,
95, 96, 30]). For the neuron with states from {–1, + 1} ( p = 1/2), the network
dynamics can be defined as
zi = sign(å j ... j ¹i wij1 ... jn z j1 ... jn ) .
1
n
The analogue of the Hebb learning rule becomes
wi1 ...in = 1
D n -1 å m =1, N
y im y im2 ... y im .
1
n
Other learning rules can also be used.
The number of stable states corresponding to the stored random binary
vectors (possibly slightly different from them) is estimated in the mentioned
papers to be N crit » a crit (n) D n -1 . As in NAMs with connections between pairs of
neurons, a crit depends on the specific type of learning rule and network
dynamics. a crit does not exceed 2 and decreases with increasing n [94]. For the
absence of errors (with a probability approaching 1), the number of stored
vectors
N » 1 D n -1 / ln D
cn
20
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
(for example, [46, 26, 95, 30]). In [95] they obtain cn > 2(2 n - 3)!! So, the
exponential in n growth of N is due to the exponential growth of the
connection number, and the characteristics per connection deteriorate with
increasing n .
The generalization of Krotov-Hopfield. For networks with higher-order
connections, the network energy in [95] is written as
-å m =1, N F (á z, y m ñ)
with a smooth function F (u) . For polynomial F (u) and n = 2 , this gives the
energy of the usual Hopfield network ([68] and Subsection "Hopfield networks
with dense vectors"). For small n , many memory vectors y m have
approximately the same values of F (u) and make a comparable contribution to
the energy. For n ® ¥ , the main contribution to the energy is given by the
memory vector y with the largest á z , yñ . For intermediate n , a large
contribution is made by several nearest memory vectors.
In [30] it is proved that for F (u) = exp(u) this memory allows one to
retrieve N = exp(a D) randomly distorted vectors (within dist Ham < D / 2 from
the stored vectors) by a single step of the sequential dynamics, for some
0 < a < ln 2 / 2 , depending on the distortion, with probability converging to 1 for
D®¥.
In [95] they consider the operation of such a network in the classification
mode, where each stored base vector corresponds to one of the categories to be
recognized. In particular, to classify the handwritten digits of the MNIST base
into 10 classes, in addition to the "visible" neurons to which 28x28 images (with
pixel values in [–1, + 1]) are input, there are 10 "classification" neurons. The
value of the output is obtained by a non-linearity g ( s ) applied to the input sum
s , for example, tanh( s) (instead of the sign( s) function used in the memory
mode). The outputs of visible neurons are fixed, and the outputs of classification
neurons are determined by a single step of the dynamics.
Vectors of N memory states are formed by learning on the training set. The
N = 2000 memory vectors minimizing the classification error for the 60,000
images of the MNIST training set were obtained with the stochastic gradient
descent algorithm.
For a single step of the dynamics this structure is equivalent to a perceptron
with one layer of N hidden neurons [95]. The nonlinearity at the output of the
visible neurons is f (u ) = F (u) , and that at the output of hidden neurons is g (u ) .
The learned memory vectors (with components normalized to [–1, + 1]) are
encoded in the weight vectors of the connections between the visible neurons
and the hidden neurons. It is shown that when n changes the visualized memory
vectors change. For small n , the memorized vectors correspond to the features
of the digit images, and for large n they become prototypes of individual digits
[95, 96].
Neural networks with first-order connections. In a neural network with
connection order n = 1 , each neuron is connected only with itself. They can be
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
21
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
considered as networks without connections, where learning changes the state of
the neurons themselves (with "neuron plasticity" [39]). Thus, memory is a single
vector of the dimension of the vectors of the base.
For binary connections, we get the Bloom filter (see the reviews [22, 149]),
which exactly recognizes the absence of an undistorted query vector in the
stored database by absence of at least one of its 1-components in the memory
vector. If the 1-components of the query vector are a subset of 1-components of
the memory vector, the vector is recognized as the base vector, but it is
necessary to check this, since there is a false positive probability due to "ghosts"
(vectors not from the base, the 1-components of which belong to the memory
vector). Ghosts can be considered as analogous to spurious memories (Subsection "Research of generalization function in NAMs").
An analysis of the probability of their appearance under certain restrictions
on stored random vectors is given in [144]. In [158], they reduce the probability
of false positives. In [57], a Bloom filter version is analyzed which recognizes
the absence of distorted query vectors. The autoscaling Bloom filter approach
proposed in [92] suggests a generalization of the counting Bloom filter approach
based on the mathematics of sparse hyperdimensional computing and allows
elastic adjustment of its capacity with probabilistic bounds on false positives and
true positives. In [90], the formation of sparse memory vectors (with an
additional operation of context-dependent thinning [134]) is considered, and in
[91] the probability of correct recognition is estimated. The use of graded
connections (the formation of the memory vector is done by addition), including
subsequent binarization, and the classification problem for vectors not from the
base, are considered in [89, 91].
For real-valued vectors and connections, the recognition of random
undistorted vectors is analyzed in [10, 126]. In [73] they allow distortion of
vectors. In [126, 73], the analysis of non-random base vectors is given.
NAMs WITH A BIPARTITE GRAPH STRUCTURE FOR NONBINARY DATA WITH CONSTRAINTS
In some recent papers (e.g., [78, 145, 110, 111]), in order to create NAMs which
can store and retrieve (from rather noisy input vectors) the number N of (not
always binary) vectors with N near exponential in D , the vectors considered
are not arbitrary random but satisfy (linear) constraints. The neural network has
the structure of a bipartite graph. One set of neurons (not connected with each
other) is used to represent the vectors of the base, neurons of the other set
represent constraints. A rectangular matrix of connections between these two
sets is learned on the vectors of the base. The connection vector of each
constraint neuron represents the vector of that particular constraint. Iterative
algorithms with local neuron computations are used for retrieval.
Iterative algorithms for learning constraint matrix and vector recovery . In
[78, 145], they consider the problem of the exact retrieval (with high probability)
of vectors that belong to a subspace of dimension less than D . The graded
weights of the bipartite graph connections representing linear constraints are
learned from the vectors of the base (which have only non-negative integer
components). Iterative algorithms are used for learning. The weights are
constrained to be sparse, which is required for analyzing the retrieval algorithm.
22
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
The input (query) vectors x are obtained from the vectors y of the base by
additive noise: x = y + e , where e are random sparse vectors with (bipolar)
integer components. During retrieval, activity propagates first from the data
neurons to the constraint neurons and then in the opposite direction, and so on
for multistep retrieval. Non-linear transformations are used in neurons. In a
stable state, the data neurons represent a base vector, and all constraint neurons
obtain a total weighted zero input from the associated data neurons.
In [78] the vectors are divided into intersecting parts. Any part of the vector
belongs to a subspace of smaller dimension than the vector dimension of that
part. А subset of the constraint neurons corresponds to each part. They are not
looking for an orthogonal basis of constraints, but for vectors orthogonal to the
corresponding parts of the data vectors from the base: W ( k ) y ( k ) = 0 , where k is
the part number. To do this, the objective function is formulated and optimized
with a stochastic gradient descent (several times for each part). During retrieval,
they first independently correct errors in each part by performing several steps of
the network dynamics. The correction is based on the fact that
W ( k ) y ( k ) = W ( k ) e( k ) .
Then, exploiting intersection of the parts, the parts without errors are used to
correct the parts with errors.
In [145], y from a subspace of dimension d < D are considered. Training
forms a matrix W of D - d non-zero linearly independent vectors orthogonal to
the vectors y of the base: Wy = 0 for all y of the base. An iterative algorithm
of activity propagation in the network retrieves y .
Algorithms [78, 145], described above, are claimed to store the number N
of vectors (generated from their respective data models) exponential in D
( O( a D ) , a > 1 ) with the possibility of correcting a number of random errors that
is linear in the vector dimension, D . However, to ensure a high probability of
retrieval, a graph with a certain structure must be obtained, which is not
guaranteed by the learning algorithms used.
NAMs based on sparse recovery algorithms. To create autoassociative
memory on the basis of a bipartite graph, in [110, 111] they use connection
matrices W which allow them to reconstruct a sparse noise vector e which
additively distorts the vector y of the base to form the query vector x . Then the
required base vector is obtained as y = x - e . The noise vector is calculated
using sparse recovery methods (that is, methods that find the solution vector
with the least number of non-zero components). These methods require
knowledge of the linear constraints matrix W such that Wy = 0 for all vectors
y of the base. For some models of vectors (i.e. constraints or generative processes for the base vectors), such W can be obtained in polynomial time from the
base of vectors generated by the model. In contrast to [78, 145], finding W is
guaranteed with high probability, and adversarial rather than random errors are
used as noise.
In [110] real-valued vectors are used as the base, satisfying a set of nonsparse linear constraints. The data model, where the vectors of the base are given
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
23
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
by linear combinations of vectors with sub-Gaussian components, allows storing
the number of vectors N up to exp( D3/4 ) . The data model with a basis of
orthonormal vectors provides N up to exp(d ) , where 1 £ d £ D . Both models
allow for accurate recovery from vectors with significant noise.
In [111], as in [145], the vectors of the base are from a subspace defined by
sparse linear constraints. They consider both real-valued vectors and binary
vectors from {-1, +1}D satisfying W models of a certain type (sparse-subGaussian model). Learning is based on solving the dictionary learning problem
with a square dictionary [111]. An iterative retrieval algorithm uses the fact that
W is an expander graph with good properties [111]. The memory capacity and
resistance to distortion is increased relative to [110].
Note the drawback of the methods considered in this section is that bases of
real data may not correspond to the data models used.
DISCUSSION
In addition to being an interesting model of biological memory, neural network
autoassociative distributed memories (NAMs) have also been considered as
index structures that give promise to speed up nearest neighbor search relative to
linear search (and, hopefully, to some other index structures). This mainly
concerns sparse binary vectors of high dimension, because the number of such
vectors that it is possible to memorize and retrieve from a significantly distorted
version may far exceed the dimensionality of the vectors in some matrix-type
NAMs, and the ratio N / D may be similar to the speed-up relative to linear
search (see the first four Sections).
Distributed NAMs have some drawbacks relative to traditional computer
science methods for nearest neighbor search. The vector retrieved by a NAM
may not be the nearest neighbor of the query vector. This could be tolerable if
the output vector is an approximate nearest neighbor from the set of stored
vectors. However, in NAMs the output vector may not even be a vector of the
base set ("spurious memories"). (Up to a certain number of stored vectors and
query vector distortion these problems remain insignificant.) For dense binary
vectors, the number of vectors able to be reliably stored and retrieved is (much)
smaller than the vector dimension. Also, NAMs are usually analyzed for the
average case of random vectors and distortions, whereas real data are not like
that, which results in poorer performance. However, available comparisons with
the inverted index for sparse binary vectors in the average case do not clearly
show the advantage of one or other algorithm in query time (Subsections "Hopfield networks with sparse vectors", "Willshaw networks with sparse vectors")
An obvious approach to improve the memory and time complexity of the
matrix-type NAMs from quadratic to linear in vector dimension is the use of
incompletely connected networks with constant (but rather large) number of
connections per neuron.
An interesting direction is index structures for similarity search in which
NAM modules are used at some stages. The index structure of Subsection
"Willshaw networks in the index structures for nearest neighbor search" uses
several NAMs to memorize parts of the base, and the similarity of the result of
24
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
single-step retrieval with the query vector is used to select the "best" NAM on
which to perform an exact linear search against its stored vectors.
Some studies are aimed at more efficient use of NAMs when working with
real data. For example, the GB network with binary connections uses different
neurons to represent the same component of the source vector, which allows for
more balanced use of connections.
In Section "Generalization in NAMs" we discussed the use of NAMs for
generalization rather than exact retrieval from associative memory. In the NAMs
that use versions of the Hebb learning rule, storage of vectors (even random
ones) is accompanied by emergence of additional stable states. For correlated
vectors, their common 1-components become "tightly" connected and stable
states corresponding to them arise. Revealing these stable states can be used for
data mining, e.g. for binary factor analysis [36, 37]. Research of complex
(possibly hierarchical) structure of stable states (discussed in terms of cores and
fringes of neural assemblies) may appear useful both for modeling brain function
and for applications.
Real data in many cases are not binary sparse vectors of high dimension
with which the NAMs considered in the first four Sections work best. So,
similarity preserving transformations to that format are required (Subsection
"Similarity preserving binary vectors"). However, the obtained vectors (as well
as the initial real data) are not random and independent, so the analytical and
experimental results available for random, independent vectors usually can not
predict NAM characteristics for real data.
Using data vectors (often non-binary) that satisfy some linear constraints
(instead of random independent vectors) allows bipartite graph based NAM
construction with capacity near exponential in the vector dimension (Section
"NAMs with a Bipartite Graph Structure for Nonbinary Data with Constraints").
However, again, this requires data from specific vector models (to which real
data often do not fit).
In NAMs with higher-order connections, connections are not between a
pair, but between a larger number of neurons (this number being the order). So,
the NAM becomes of tensor-type instead of matrix-type. These NAMs (Section
"NAMs with Higher-Order Connections and without Connections") allow
storing the number of dense vectors exponential in the order. However, this is
achieved by the corresponding increase in the number of connections, and
therefore in memory and in query time.
The higher-order NAMs are generalized in [95, 96], where, roughly, the
sum of polynomial functions of the dot products between all memory vectors
and the network state is used as the input sum of a neuron. Such a treatment
makes it possible to draw interesting analogies with perceptrons and kernel
methods in the classification problem. However, for nearest neighbor search, this
seems impose a query time exceeding that of linear search.
Overcoming these and other drawbacks and knowledge gaps, and improving
NAMs are promising topics for further research.
Let's note other directions of research in fast similarity search of binary
(non- sparse) vectors. Examples of index structures for exact search are [28]
(with a fixed query radius and analysis for worst-case data; however impractical
due to the small query radius required for sub-linear query time and moderate
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
25
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
memory costs) and [116] (practical, with variable radius of the query and
analysis for random data).
Theoretical algorithms for approximate search (providing: sublinear search
time, a specified maximum difference of the result from the result of the exact
search, and no false negatives) in [2] are modifications of more practical
algorithm classes related to Locality Sensitive Hashing and Locality Sensitive
Filtering (see [18, 14, 147]). However, the latter allow false negatives (with low
probability). Unlike NAMs, these algorithms provide guarantees for the worstcase data, but require a separate index structure for each degree of distortion of
the query vector. The bounds on the ratio of binomial coefficients [2] is useful
for NAMs.
We note that the index structures for the Hamming distance [28, 116] work
with vectors of moderate dimension (up to hundreds), and for binary sparse high
dimensional vectors Jaccard similarity index structures are used [147, 2, 27, 29].
A survey of these and other similar index structures is presented in the
forthcoming [133], see also [132] for another type of index structures.
REFERENCES
1. Abbott L.F., Arian Y. Storage capacity of generalized networks. Physical Review A.
1987. Vol. 36, N. 10. P. 5091–5094.
2. Ahle T.D. Optimal las vegas locality sensitive data structures. arXiv:1704.02054. 6 Apr
2017.
3. Aliabadi B. K., Berrou C., Gripon V., Jiang X. Storing sparse messages in networks of
neural cliques. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems . 2014. Vol. 25.
P. 980–989.
4. Amari S. Characteristics of sparsely encoded associative memory. Neural Networks.
1989. Vol. 2, N. 6. P. 451–457.
5. Amari S., Maginu K. Statistical neurodynamics of associative memory. Neural Networks. 1988. Vol. 1. P. 63–73.
6. Amit D.J. Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 1989. 554 p.
7. Amit D.J., Fusi S. Learning in neural networks with material synapses. Neural Computation. 1994. V. 6, N. 5. P. 957–982.
8. Amit D.J., Gutfreund H., Sompolinsky H. Statistical mechanics of neural networks near
saturation. Annals of Physics. 1987. Vol. 173. P. 30–67.
9. Amosov N.M. Modelling of thinking and the mind. New York: Spartan Books. 1967.
10. Anderson J.A. A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists. Psychological Review. 1973. Vol. 80, N. 6. P. 417–438.
11. Anderson, J. A. Cognitive and psychological computation with ceural models. IEEE
trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. 1983. Vol. 13, N. 5. P. 799–814.
12. Anderson J.A., Murphy G.L. Psychological concepts in a parallel system. Physica D.
1986. Vol. 22, N. 1–3. P. 318–336.
13. Anderson J.A., Silverstein J.W., Ritz S.A., Jones R.S. Distinctive features, categorical
perception and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological
Review. 1977. V. 84. P. 413–451.
14. Andoni A., Laarhoven T., Razenshteyn I., Waingarten E. Optimal hashing-based timespace trade-offs for approximate near neighbors. Proc. SODA'17. 2017. P. 47–66.
15. Baidyk T.N., Kussul E.M. Structure of neural assembly. Proc. RNNS/IEEE symposium
on neuroinformatics and neurocomputers. 1992. P. 423–434.
16. Baidyk T.N., Kussul E.M., Rachkovskij D.A . Numerical-analytical method for neural
network investigation. Proc. NEURONET'90. 1990. P. 217–219.
26
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
17. Baldi, P. and Venkatesh, S.S. Number of stable points for spin-glasses and neural networks of higher orders. Physical Review Letters. 1987. Vol. 58, N. 9. P. 913–916.
18. Becker A., Ducas L., Gama N., Laarhoven T. New directions in nearest neighbor searching with applications to lattice sieving. Proc. SODA'16. 2016. P. 10–24.
19. Boguslawski B., Gripon V., Seguin F., Heitzmann F. Twin neurons for efficient realworld data distribution in networks of neural cliques: Applications in power management in electronic circuits. IEEE Trans. NNLS. 2016. Vol. 27, N. 2. P. 375–387.
20. Bovier A. Sharp upper bounds on perfect retrieval in the Hopfield model. J. Appl.
Probab. 1999. Vol. 36, N.3. P. 941–950.
21. Braitenberg V. Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In Theoretical approaches to complex systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1978. P. 171–188.
22. Broder A., Mitzenmacher M. Network applications of Bloom filters: A survey. Internet
mathematics. 2004. Vol. 1, N. 4. P. 485–509.
23. Brunel N., Carusi F., Fusi S. Slow stochastic Hebbian learning of classes of stimuli in a
recurrent neural network. Network. 1998. Vol. 9. P. 123–152.
24. Buckingham J., Willshaw D. On setting unit thresholds in an incompletely connected
associative net. Network. 1993. Vol. 4. P. 441–459.
25. Burshtein D. Non-direct convergence radius and number of iterations of the Hopfield
associative memory. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory. 1994. Vol. 40. P. 838–847.
26. Burshtein D. Long-term attraction in higher order neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural
Networks. 1998. Vol. 9, N. 1. P. 42–50.
27. Christiani T., Pagh R. Set similarity search beyond MinHash. Proc. STOC'17. 2017.
P. 1094–1107.
28. Cole R., Gottlieb L.-A., Lewenstein M. Dictionary matching and indexing with errors
and don’t cares. Proc. STOC'04. 2004. P. 91–100.
29. Dahlgaard S., Knudsen M.B.T., Thorup M. Fast similarity sketching. arXiv:1704.04370.
14 Apr 2017.
30. Demircigil M., Heusel J., Lowe M., Upgang S. Vermet F. On a model of associative
memory with huge storage capacity. J. Stat. Phys. 2017. Vol. 168, N 2. P. 288–299.
31. Donaldson R., Gupta A, Plan Y., Reimer T. Random mappings designed for commercial
search engines. arXiv:1507.05929. 21 Jul 2015.
32. Feigelman M.V., Ioffe L.B. The augmented models of associative memory – asymmetric
interaction and hierarchy of patterns. Int. Journal of Modern Physics B. 1987. Vol. 1,
N. 1, P. 51–68.
33. Ferdowsi S., Voloshynovskiy S., Kostadinov D., Holotyak T. Fast content identification
in highdimensional feature spaces using sparse ternary codes. Proc. WIFS'16. 2016.
P. 1–6.
34. Frolov A.A., Husek D., Muraviev I.P. Information capacity and recall quality in sparsely
encoded Hopfield-like neural network: Analytical approaches and computer simulation.
Neural Networks. 1997. Vol. 10, N. P. 845–855.
35. Frolov A.A., Husek D., Muraviev I.P. Informational efficiency of sparsely encoded
Hopfield-like associative memory. Optical Memory & Neural Networks. 2003. Vol. 12,
N 3. P. 177–197.
36. Frolov A.A., Husek D., Muraviev I.P., Polyakov P. . Boolean factor analysis by attractor
neural network. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 2007. Vol. 18, N. 3. P. 698–707.
37. Frolov A.A., Husek D., Polyakov P.Y. Recurrent neural-network-based boolean factor
analysis and its application to word clustering. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 2009.
Vol. 20, N. 7. P. 1073–1086.
38. Frolov A. A., Husek D., Rachkovskij. Time of searching for similar binary vectors in
associative memory. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2006. Vol. 42, N. 5. P. 615–623.
39. Frolov A.A., Muraviev I.P. Neural models of associative memory. Moscow: Nauka,
1987. 161 p.
40. Frolov A.A., Muraviev I.P. Information characteristics of neural networks. Moscow:
Nauka, 1988. 160 p.
41. Frolov A.A., Muraviev I.P. Information characteristics of neural networks capable of asISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
27
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
sociative learning based on Hebbian plasticity. Network. 1993. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 495–536.
42. Frolov A., Kartashov A., Goltsev A., Folk R. Quality and efficiency of retrieval for
Willshaw-like autoassociative networks. Correction. Network. 1995. Vol. 6. P. 513–534.
43. Frolov A., Kartashov A., Goltsev A., Folk R. Quality and efficiency of retrieval for Willshaw-like autoassociative networks. Recognition. Network. 1995. Vol. 6. P. 535–549.
44. Frolov A.A., Rachkovskij D.A., Husek D. On information characteristics of Willshawlike auto-associative memory. Neural Network World. 2002. Vol. 12, N. 2. P. 141–157.
45. Gallant S.I., Okaywe T.W. Representing objects, relations, and sequences. Neural Computation. 2013. Vol. 25, N. 8. P. 2038–2078.
46. Gardner E. 1987. Multiconnected neural network models. Journal of Physics A. 1998.
Vol. 20, N. 11. P.3453–3464.
47. Gardner E. The space of interactions in neural-network models. J. Phys. A. 1988.
Vol. 21. P. 257–270.
48. Gibson W. G., Robinson J. Statistical analysis of the dynamics of a sparse associative
memory. Neural Networks. 1992. Vol. 5. P. 645–661.
49. Golomb D., Rubin N., Sompolinsky H. Willshaw model: Associative memory with
sparse coding and low firing rates 1990. Phys Rev A. Vol. 41, N. 4. P. 1843–1854.
50. Goltsev A. An assembly neural network for texture segmentation. Neural Networks.
1996. Vol. 9, N. 4. P. 643–653.
51. Goltsev A. Secondary learning in the assembly neural network. Neurocomputing. 2004.
Vol. 62. P. 405–426.
52. Goltsev A., Húsek D. Some properties of the assembly neural networks. Neural Network
World. 2002. Vol. 12, N. 1. P. 15–32.
53. Goltsev A., Wunsch D.C. Generalization of features in the assembly neural networks.
International Journal of Neural Systems . 2004. Vol. 14, N. 1. P. 1–18.
54. Goltsev A.D. Neural networks with the assembly organization. Kiev: Naukova Dumka,
2005. 200 p.
55. Goltsev A., Gritsenko V. Modular neural networks with Hebbian learning rule.
Neurocomputing. 2009. Vol. 72. P. 2477–2482.
56. Goltsev A., Gritsenko V. Modular neural networks with radial neural columnar architecture. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures. 2015. Vol. 13, P. 63–74.
57. Goswami M., Pagh R., Silvestri F., Sivertsen J. Distance sensitive bloom filters without
false negatives. Proc. SODA'17. 2017. P. 257–269.
58. Gripon V., Berrou C. Sparse neural networks with large learning diversity. IEEE Trans.
on Neural Networks. 2011. Vol. 22, N. 7. P. 1087–1096.
59. Gripon V., Heusel J., Lowe M., Vermet F. A comparative study of sparse associative
memories. Journal of Statistical Physics. 2016. Vol. 164. P. 105–129.
60. Gripon V., Lowe M., Vermet F. Associative memories to accelerate approximate nearest
neighbor search. ArXiv:1611.05898. 10 Nov 2016.
61. Gritsenko V.I., Rachkovskij D.A., Goltsev A.D., Lukovych V.V., Misuno I.S., Revunova E.G., Slipchenko S.V., Sokolov A.M., Talayev S.A. Neural distributed representation for intelligent information technologies and modeling of thinking. Cybernetics and
Computer Engineering. 2013. Vol. 173. P. 7–24.
62. Guo J. K., Brackle D. V., Lofaso N., Hofmann M. O. Vector representation for subgraph
encoding to resolve entities. Procedia Computer Science. 2016. Vol. 95. P. 327–334.
63. Gutfreund H. Neural networks with hierarchically correlated patterns. Physical Review
A. 1988. Vol. 37, N. 2. P. 570–577.
64. Hacene G. B., Gripon V., Farrugia N., Arzel M., Jezequel M. Finding all matches in a
database using binary neural networks. Proc. COGNITIVE'17. 2017. P. 59–64.
65. Hebb D.O. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York:
Wiley, 1949. 335 p.
66. Herrmann M., Ruppin E., Usher M. A neural model of the dynamic activation of memory. Biol. Cybern. 1993. Vol. 68. P. 455–463.
67. Heusel J., Lowe M., Vermet F. On the capacity of an associative memory model based
on neural cliques. Statist. Probab. Lett. 2015. Vol. 106. P. 256–261.
28
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
68. Hopfield J.J. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. of the Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 1982. Vol. 79, N 8. P. 2554–2558.
69. Hopfield J.J., Feinstein D.I., Palmer R.G. "Unlearning" has a stabilizing effect in collective memories. Nature. 1983. Vol. 304. P. 158–159.
70. Horn D., Usher M. Capacities of multiconnected memory models. Journal de Physique,
1988. Vol. 49, N. 3. P. 389–395.
71. Horner H., Bormann D., Frick M., Kinzelbach H., Schmidt A. Transients and basins of
attraction in neutral network models. Z. Physik B. 1989. Vol. 76. P. 381–398.
72. Howard M. W., Kahana M. J. A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal
of Mathematical Psychology. 2002. Vol. 46. P. 269–299.
73. Iscen A., Furon T., Gripon V., Rabbat M., Jegou H. Memory vectors for similarity
search in high-dimensional spaces. arXiv:1412.3328. 1 Mar 2017.
74. Kakeya H., Kindo T. Hierarchical concept formation in associative memory composed
of neuro-window elements. Neural Networks. 1996. Vol. 9, N. 7. P. 1095–1098.
75. Kanerva P. Sparse Distributed Memory. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988. 155 p.
76. Kanerva P. Hyperdimensional computing: an introduction to computing in distributed
representation with high-dimensional random vectors. Cognitive Computation. 2009.
Vol. 1, N. 2. P. 139–159.
77. Kanter I. Potts-glass models of neural networks. Physical Rev. A. 1988. V. 37, N 7.
P. 2739–2742.
78. Karbasi A., Salavati A. H., Shokrollahi A. Iterative learning and denoising in convolutional neural associative memories. Proc. ICML'13. 2013. P. 445–453.
79. Kartashov A., Frolov A., Goltsev A., Folk R. Quality and efficiency of retrieval for
Willshaw-like autoassociative networks. Willshaw–Potts model. Network. 1997. Vol. 8,
N. 1. P. 71–86.
80. Kinzel W. Learning and pattern recognition in spin glass models. Z. Physik B. 1985.
Vol. 60. P. 205–213.
81. Knoblauch A., Palm G., Sommer F. T. Memory capacities for synaptic and structural
plasticity. Neural Computation. 2010. Vol. 22, N. 2. P. 289–341.
82. Kleyko D., Khan S., Osipov E., Yong S. P. Modality classification of medical images
with distributed representations based on cellular automata reservoir computing. Proc.
ISBI'17. 2017. P. 1–4.
83. Kleyko D., Lyamin N., Osipov E., Riliskis L. Dependable MAC layer architecture based
on holographic data representation using hyperdimensional binary spatter codes. Proc.
MACOM'12. 2012. P. 134–145.
84. Kleyko D., Osipov E. Brain-like classifier of temporal patterns. Proc. ICCOINS'14.
2014. P. 1–6.
85. Kleyko D., Osipov E. On bidirectional transitions between localist and distributed representations: The case of common substrings search using vector symbolic architecture.
Procedia Computer Science. 2014. Vol. 41. P. 104–113.
86. Kleyko D., Osipov E., Gayler R. W. Recognizing permuted words with Vector Symbolic
Architectures: A Cambridge test for machines. Procedia Computer Science. 2016.
Vol. 88. P. 169–175.
87. Kleyko D., Osipov E., Gayler R. W., Khan A. I., Dyer A. G. Imitation of honey bees’
concept learning processes using vector symbolic architectures. Biologically Inspired
Cognitive Architectures. 2015. Vol. 14. P. 55–72.
88. Kleyko D., Osipov E., Papakonstantinou N., Vyatkin V., Mousavi A. Fault detection in
the hyperspace: Towards intelligent automation systems. Proc. INDIN'15. 2015.
P. 1219–1224.
89. Kleyko D., Osipov E., Senior A., Khan A. I., Sekercioglu Y. A. Holographic Graph
Neuron: a bio-inspired architecture for pattern processing. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks
and Learning Systems. 2017. Vol. 28, N 6. P. 1250–1262.
90. Kleyko D., Osipov E., Rachkovskij D. Modi fication of holographic graph neuron using
sparse distributed representations. Procedia Computer Science. 2016. Vol. 88. P. 39–45.
91. Kleyko D., Rahimi A., Rachkovskij D.A., Osipov E., Rabaey J.M. Classi fication and
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
29
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
recall with binary hyperdimensional computing: trade-offs in choice of density and mapping characteristics (2017, Submitted).
92. Kleyko D., Rahimi A, Osipov E. Autoscaling Bloom Filter: controlling trade-off between true and false. arXiv:1705.03934. 10 May 2017
93. Kohonen T. Content-Addressable Memories. Berlin: Springer, 1987. 388 p.
94. Kohring G.A. Neural networks with many-neuron interactions. Journal de Physique.
1990. Vol. 51, N 2. P. 145–155.
95. Krotov D., Hopfield J.J. Dense associative memory for pattern recognition. Proc.
NIPS'16. 2016. P. 1172–1180.
96. Krotov D., Hopfield J.J. Dense associative memory is robust to adversarial inputs.
arXiv:1701.00939. 4 Jan 2017
97. Kryzhanovsky B.V., Mikaelian A.L., Fonarev A.B. Vector neural net identifing many
strongly distorted and correlated patterns. Proc. SPIE. 2005. Vol. 5642. 124–133.
98. Kussul E. M. Associative neuron-like structures. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1992.
99. Kussul E. M., Baidyk T. N. A modular structure of associative-projective neural networks. Preprint 93-6. Kiev, Ukraine: GIC, 1993.
100. Kussul E.M., Fedoseyeva T.V. On audio signals recognition in neural assembly structures. Preprint 87-28. Kiev: Inst. of Cybern. 1987. 21 pp.
101. Kussul E., Makeyev O., Baidyk T., Calderon Reyes D. Neural network with ensembles.
Proc. IJCNN'10. 2010. P. 2955–2961.
102. Kussul E.M., Rachkovskij D.A. Multilevel assembly neural architecture and processing
of sequences. In Neurocomputers and Attention, V. II: Connectionism and neurocomputers. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1991. P.577–590.
103. Kussul E.M., Rachkovskij D.A., Wunsch D.C. The random subspace coarse coding
scheme for real-valued vectors. Proc. IJCNN'99. 1999. P. 450-455.
104. Lansner A. Associative memory models: From the cell assembly theory to biophysically
detailed cortex simulations. Trends in Neurosciences. 2009. Vol. 32, N. 3. P. 178–186.
105. Lansner A., Ekeberg O. Reliability and speed of recall in an associative network. IEEE
Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1985. Vol. 7. P. 490–498.
106. Levy S. D., Gayler R. Vector Symbolic Architectures: A new building material for artificial general intelligence. Proc. AGI'08. 2008. P. 414–418.
107. Lowe M. On the storage capacity of Hopfield models with correlated patterns. The Annals of Applied Probability. 1998. Vol. 8, N. 4. P. 1216–1250.
108. Lowe M., Vermet F. The storage capacity of the Hopfield model and moderate deviations. Statistics and Probability Letters. 2005. Vol. 75. P. 237–248.
109. Lowe M., Vermet F. The capacity of q-state Potts neural networks with parallel retrieval
dynamics. Statistics and Probability Letters. 2007. Vol. 77, N. 4. P. 1505–1514.
110. Mazumdar A., Rawat A.S. Associative memory via a sparse recovery model. Proc.
NIPS'15. 2015. P. 2683–2691.
111. Mazumdar A., Rawat A.S. Associative memory using dictionary learning and expander
decoding. Proc. AAAI'17. 2017. P. 267–273.
112. McEliece R.J., Posner E.C., Rodemich E.R., Venkatesh S.S. The capacity of the Hopfield associative memory. IEEE Trans. Information Theory. 1987. Vol. 33, N. 4.
P. 461–482.
113. Misuno I.S., Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V. Vector and distributed representations
reflecting semantic relatedness of words. Math. machines and systems. 2005. N. 3.
P. 50–67.
114. Misuno I.S., Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V., Sokolov A.M. Searching for text information with the help of vector representations. Probl. Progr. 2005. N. 4. P. 50–59.
115. Nadal J.-P. Associative memory: on the (puzzling) sparse coding limit. J. Phys. A. 1991.
Vol. 24. P. 1093–1101.
116. Norouzi M., Punjani A., Fleet D. J. Fast exact search in Hamming space with multiindex hashing. IEEE Trans. PAMI. 2014. Vol. 36, N 6. P. 1107–1119.
117. Onizawa N., Jarollahi H., Hanyu T., Gross W.J. Hardware implementation of associative
memories based on multiple-valued sparse clustered networks. IEEE Journal on Emerg-
30
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
ing and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems. 2016. Vol. 6, N. 1. P. 13–24.
118. Palm G. On associative memory. Biological Cybernetics. 1980. Vol. 36. P. 19–31.
119. Palm G. Memory capacity of local rules for synaptic modification. Concepts in Neuroscience. 1991. Vol. 2, N. 1. P. 97–128.
120. Palm G. Neural associative memories and sparse coding. Neural Networks. 2013.
Vol. 37. P. 165–171.
121. Palm G., Knoblauch A., Hauser F., Schuz A. Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. Biol.
Cybern. 2014. Vol. 108, N 5. P. 559–572
122. Palm G., Sommer F. T. Information capacity in recurrent Mc.Culloch-Pitts networks
with sparsely coded memory states. Network. 1992, Vol. 3, P. 177–186.
123. Parga N., Virasoro M.A. The ultrametric organization of memories in a neural network.
J. Mod. Phys. 1986. Vol. 47, N. 11. P. 1857–1864.
124. Peretto P., Niez J.J. Long term memory storage capacity of multiconnected neural networks. Biol. Cybern. 1986. Vol. 54, N. 1. P. 53–63.
125. Personnaz L., Guyon I., Dreyfus G. Collective computational properties of neural networks: New learning mechanisms. Phys. Rev. A. 1986. Vol. 34, N. 5. P. 4217–4228.
126. Plate T. Holographic reduced representation: Distributed representation for cognitive
structures. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 2003. 300 p.
127. Rachkovskij D.A. Representation and processing of structures with binary sparse distributed codes. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering . 2001. Vol. 13,
N 2. P. 261–276.
128. Rachkovskij D.A. Some approaches to analogical mapping with structure sensitive distributed representations. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence.
2004. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 125–145.
129. Rachkovskij D.A. Formation of similarity-reflecting binary vectors with random binary
projections. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2015. Vol. 51, N 2. P. 313–323.
130. Rachkovskij D.A. Estimation of vectors similarity by their randomized binary projections. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2015. Vol. 51, N 5. P. 808–818.
131. Rachkovskij D.A. Binary vectors for fast distance and similarity estimation. Cybernetics
and Systems Analysis. 2017. Vol. 53, N 1. P. 138–156.
132. Rachkovkij D.A. Distance-based index structures for fast similarity search. Cybernetics
and Systems Analysis. 2017. Vol. 53, N 4.
133. Rachkovskij D.A. Index structures for fast similarity search of binary vectors. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis. 2017. Vol. 53, N 5.
134. Rachkovskij D.A., Kussul E.M., Baidyk T.N. Building a world model with structuresensitive sparse binary distributed representations. BICA. 2013. Vol. 3. P. 64–86.
135. Rachkovskij D.A., Misuno I.S., Slipchenko S.V. Randomized projective methods for
construction of binary sparse vector representations. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis.
2012. Vol. 48, N 1. P. 146–156.
136. Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V. Similarity-based retrieval with structure-sensitive
sparse binary distributed representations. Computational Intelligence. 2012. Vol. 28,
N 1. P. 106–129.
137. Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V., Kussul E.M., Baidyk T.N. Sparse binary distributed
encoding of scalars. J. of Automation and Inf. Sci. 2005. Vol. 37, N 6. P. 12–23.
138. Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V., Kussul E.M., Baidyk T.N. Properties of numeric
сodes for the scheme of random subspaces RSC. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis.
2005. 41, N 4. P. 509–520.
139. Rachkovskij D.A., Slipchenko S.V., Misuno I.S., Kussul E.M., Baidyk T.N. Sparse
binary distributed encoding of numeric vectors . J. of Automation and Inf. Sci. 2005.
Vol. 37, N 11. P. 47–61.
140. Reznik A.M., Sitchov A.S., Dekhtyarenko O.K., Nowicki D.W. Associative memories
with killed neurons: the methods of recovery. Proc. IJCNN'03. 2003. P. 2579–2582.
141. Rizzuto D.S., Kahana M.J. An autoassociative neural network model of paired-associate
learning. Neural Computation. 2001. Vol. 13. P. 2075–2092.
142. Rolls E. T. Advantages of dilution in the connectivity of attractor networks in the brain.
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
31
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures. 2012. Vol. 1, P. 44–54.
143. Romani S., Pinkoviezky I., Rubin A., Tsodyks M. Scaling laws of associative memory
retrieval. Neural Computation. 2013. Vol. 25, N. 10. P. 2523–2544.
144. Rosenfeld R., Touretzky D.S. Coarse-coded symbol memories and their properties.
Complex Systems. 1988. Vol. 2, N. 4. P. 463–484.
145. Salavati A.H., Kumar K.R., Shokrollahi A. Nonbinary associative memory with exponential pattern retrieval capacity and iterative learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks
and Learning Systems. 2014. Vol. 25, N. 3. P. 557–570.
146. Schwenker F., Sommer F.T., Palm G. Iterative retrieval of sparsely coded associative
memory patterns. Neural Networks. 1996. Vol. 9. P. 445-455.
147. Shrivastava A., Li P. In defense of minhash over simhash. Proc. AISTATS'14. 2014.
P. 886–894.
148. Slipchenko S.V., Rachkovskij D.A. Analogical mapping using similarity of binary distributed representations. International Journal Information Theories and Applications .
2009. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 269–290.
149. Tarkoma S., Rothenberg C. E., Lagerspetz E. Theory and Practice of Bloom Filters for
Distributed Systems. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials . 2012. Vol. 14,
N 1. P. 131–155.
150. Tsodyks M. Associative memory in asymmetric diluted network with low level of activity. Europhysics Letters. 1988. Vol. 7, N 3. 203–208.
151. Tsodyks M. Associative memory in neural networks with the hebbian learning rule.
Modern Physics Letters B. 1989. Vol. 3, N 7. P. 555–560.
152. Tsodyks M.V. Associative memory in neural networks with binary synapses. Mod. Phys.
Lett. 1990. Vol. B4. P. 713–716.
153. Tsodyks M.V. Hierarchical associative memory in neural networks with low activity
level. Modern Physics Letters B. 1990. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 259–265.
154. Tsodyks M., Feigelman M. The enhanced storage capacity in neural networks with low
activity level. Europhysics Letters. 1988. Vol. 6, N 2. P. 101–105.
155. Vedenov A. A., Ezhov A.A., Knizhnikova L.A., Levchenko E.B. "Spurious memory" in
model neural networks. Preprint IAE-4395/1. 1987. Moscow: KIAE.
156. Willshaw D. Holography, associative memory and inductive generalization. In Parallel
Models of Associative Memory. Hillside: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1981.
P. 83–104.
157. Willshaw D. J., Buneman O. P., Longuet-Higgins H. C. Non-holographic associative
memory. Nature. Vol. 1969. Vol. 222. P. 960–962.
158. Yang X., Vernitski A., Carrea L. An approximate dynamic programming approach for
improving accuracy of lossy data compression by Bloom filters. European Journal of
Operational Research. 2016. Vol. 252, N 3. P 985–994.
159. Yu C., Gripon V., Jiang X., Jegou H. Neural associative memories as accelerators for
binary vector search. Proc. COGNITIVE'15. 2015. P. 85–89.
Получено 15.04.2017
32
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
В.И. Гриценко1, член-корреспондент НАН Украины директор,
e-mail: [email protected]
Д.А. Рачковский1, д-р техн. наук, вед. науч. сотр.
отд. нейросетевых технологий обработки информации,
e-mail: [email protected]
А.А. Фролов2, д-р биол.наук, проф.,
факультет электротехники и информатики,
e-mail: [email protected]
Р. Гейлер3 PhD (психология), исследователь,
e-mail: [email protected]
Д. Клейко4, аспирант, факультет информатики,
электрической и космической техники.
e-mail: [email protected]
Е. Осипов4, PhD (информатика), проф., факультет информатики,
электрической и космической техники
e-mail: [email protected]
1
Международный научно-учебный центр информационных технологий
и систем НАН Украины и МОН Украины, пр. Академика Глушкова, 40,
г. Киев, 03187, Украина
2
Технический университет Остравы, 17 listopadu 15,
708 33 Острава-Поруба, Чешская Республика
3
Мельбурн, штат Виктория, Австралия
4
Технологический университет Лулео, 971 87 Лулео, Швеция
НЕЙРОСЕТЕВАЯ РАСПРЕДЕЛЕННАЯ
АВТОАССОЦИАТИВНАЯ ПАМЯТЬ: ОБЗОР
В настоящем обзоре рассмотрены модели автоассоциативной распределенной памяти,
которые могут быть естественным образом реализованы нейронными сетями. Модели
используют для запоминания векторов в основном локальном правиле обучения путем
модификации значений весов межнейронных связей, которые существуют между всеми нейронами (полносвязные сети). В распределенной памяти различные векторы
запоминают в одних и тех же ячейках памяти, которым в рассматриваемом случае
нейронной сети соответствуют одни и те же связи. Обычно исследуют запоминание
векторов, случайно выбранных из некоторого распределения.
При подаче на вход автоассоциативной памяти искаженных вариантов запомненных в ней векторов осуществляется извлечение (восстановление) ближайшего запомненного вектора. Это реализуется за счет итеративной динамики нейронной сети на
основе локально доступной в нейронах информации, полученной по связям от других
нейронов сети. Вплоть до определенного количества запомненных в сети векторов и
степени их искажения на входе, в результате динамики сеть с симметричными связями
приходит в устойчивое состояние, соответствующее запомненному в сети вектору,
имеющему наибольшее сходство с входным вектором (сходство обычно измеряют в
терминах скалярного произведения).
Такие нейросетевые варианты автоассоциативной памяти позволяют запомнить с
возможностью восстановления такого количества векторов, которое может превышать
размерность векторов (совпадающую с количества нейронов в сети). Для векторов
большой размерности это открывает возможность поиска приближенного ближайшего
соседа с временной сложностью, сублинейной от количества запомненных в нейронной сети векторов. К недостаткам такой памяти относится то, что восстановленный
динамикой сети вектор может не быть ближайшим ко входному или даже может вообще не принадлежать к множеству запомненных векторов и значительно отличаться от
любого из них. Исследования различных типов нейросетевой автоассоциативной памяти направлены на выявление диапазонов параметров, при которых указанные недостатки проявляются с малой вероятностью, а достоинства выражены в максимальной
степени.
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
33
V.I. Gritsenko, D.A. Rachkovskij, A.A. Frolov, R. Gayler, D. Kleyko, E. Osipov
Основное внимание уделено сетям с парными связями типа Hopfield, Willshaw,
Potts и работе с бинарными разреженными векторами (векторами с количеством единичных компонентов, малым по сравнению с количеством их нулевых компонентов),
т.к. только для таких векторов удается запомнить с возможностью восстановления
большое количество векторов. Помимо функции автоассоциативной памяти, для этих
сетей также обсуждается функция обобщения. Обсуждаются также неполносвязные
сети. Кроме того, рассмотрена автоассоциативная память в нейронных сетях со связями высшего порядка — то есть со связями не между парами, а между большим количеством нейронов.
Рассмотрена также автоассоциативная память в нейронных сетях со структурой
двудольного графа, где одно множество нейронов представляет запоминаемые векторы, а другое — линейные ограничения, которым они подчиняются. Эти сети выполняют функцию автоассоциативной памяти и для небинарных данных, удовлетворяющих
заданной модели ограничений.
Обсуждаются отношение рассмотренных в обзоре моделей нейросетевой автоассоциативной распределенной памяти к проблематике поиска по сходству, достоинства
и недостатки рассмотренных методов, направления дальнейших исследований. Один
из интересных и все еще не полностью разрешенных вопросов заключается в том,
может ли нейронная автоассоциативная память искать приближенных ближайших
соседей быстрее других индексных структур для поиска по сходству, в частности, для
случая векторов очень больших размерностей.
Ключевые слова: распределенная ассоциативная память, разреженный бинарный
вектор, сеть Хопфилда, память Уиллшоу, модель Поттса, ближайший сосед, поиск
по сходству.
В.І. Гриценко1, член-кореспондент НАН України, директор,
e-mail: [email protected]
Д.А. Рачковський1, д-р техн. наук, пров. наук. співроб.
відд. нейромережевих технологій оброблення інформації,
e-mail: [email protected]
А.А. Фролов2, д-р біол. наук, проф.,
факультет електротехніки та інформатики,
e-mail: [email protected]
Р. Гейлер3, PhD (психологія), дослідник,
e-mail: [email protected]
Д. Клейко4, аспірант, факультет інформатики,
електричної та космичної техніки.
e-mail: [email protected]
Е. Осипов4, PhD (інформатика), проф., факультет інформатики,
електричної та космичної техніки
e-mail: [email protected]
1
Міжнародний науково-учбовий центр інформаціоних технологій
та систем НАН України та МОН України, пр. Академіка Глушкова, 40,
м. Київ, 03187, Україна
2
Технічний університет Острави, 17 listopadu 15,
708 33 Острава-Поруба, Чеська Республіка
3
Мельбурн, штат Вікторія, Австралія
4
Технологічний університет Лулео, 971 87 Лулео, Швеція
НЕЙРОМЕРЕЖНА РОЗПОДІЛЕНА
АВТОАССОЦІАТИВНА ПАМ’ЯТЬ: ОГЛЯД
У цьому огляді розглянуто моделі автоасоціативної розподіленої пам’яті, які можуть
бути природним чином реалізовані нейронними мережами. Моделі використовують
для запам’ятовування векторів в основному локальному правилі навчання шляхом
34
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
Neural Distributed Autoassociative Memories: A Survey
модифікації значень ваг міжнейронних зв’язків, які існують між всіма нейронами (повнозв’язні мережі). У розподіленій пам’яті різні вектори запам’ятовуються в одних і тих
самих елементах пам’яті, яким в цьому випадку нейронної мережі відповідають одні і
ті ж зв’язки. Зазвичай досліджують запам’ятовування векторів, випадково вибраних з
деякого розподілу.
Якщо на вхід автоасоціативної пам’яті подаються спотворені варіанти запам’ятованих в ній векторів, здійснюється витяг (відновлення) найближчого раніше
запам’ятованого вектора. Це реалізується за рахунок ітераційної динаміки нейронної
мережі на основі локально доступної в нейронах інформації, отриманої від інших
нейронів мережі. До певної кількості запам’ятованих в мережі векторів і ступеня їх
спотворення на вході, в результаті динаміки мережа із симетричними зв’язками приходить в стійкий стан, відповідний запам’ятованому в мережі вектору, який має
найбільшу схожість з вхідним вектором (схожість зазвичай вимірюють як скалярний
добуток).
Такі нейромережні варіанти автоасоціативної пам’яті дозволяють запам’ятати з
можливістю відновлення таку кількість векторів, яка може перевищувати розмірність
векторів (що збігається з кількістю нейронів в мережі). Для векторів великої
розмірності це відкриває можливість пошуку наближеного найближчого сусіда з
складністю, сублінейною від кількості запам’ятованих в нейронній мережі векторів. До
недоліків такої пам’яті відноситься те, що відновлений динамікою мережі вектор може
не бути найближчим до вхідного або навіть може взагалі не належати до множини
запам’ятованих векторів і значно відрізнятися від будь-якого з них. Дослідження
різних типів нейромережної автоасоціативної пам’яті спрямовано на виявлення
діапазонів параметрів, при яких зазначені недоліки проявляються з малою імовірністю,
а достоїнства виражені в максимальному ступені.
Основну увагу приділено мережам з парними зв’язками типу Hopfield, Willshaw,
Potts і роботі з бінарними розрідженими векторами (векторами з кількістю одиничних
компонентів, яке є малим у порівнянні з кількістю їх нульових компонентів), так як
тільки для таких векторів вдається запам’ятати з можливістю відновлення велику
кількість векторів. Крім функції автоасоціативної пам’яті, для цих мереж також
обговорюється функція узагальнення. Обговорюються також неповнозв’язкові мережі.
Крім того, розглянуто автоасоціативну пам’ять в нейронних мережах зі зв’язками вищого порядку — тобто зі зв’язками не між парами, а між великою кількістю нейронів.
Розглянуто також автоасоціативна пам’ять в нейронних мережах зі структурою
двудольного графа, де одна множина нейронів надає вектори, які запам’ятовуються, а
інша — лінійні обмеження, яким вони підкорюються. Ці мережі виконують функцію
автоасоціативної пам’яті також для небінарних даних, які відповідають заданій моделі
обмежень.
Обговорюються можливості використання розглянутих в огляді моделей
нейромережної автоасоціативної розподіленої пам’яті у проблематиці пошуку за
схожістю, достоїнства і недоліки розглянутих методів, напрямки подальших
досліджень. Один із цікавих і все ще не повністю вирішених питань полягає в тому, чи
може нейронна автоасоціативна пам’ять шукати наближених найближчих сусідів
швидше інших індексних структур для пошуку за схожістю, зокрема, у випадку
векторів дуже великих розмірностей.
Ключові слова: розподілена асоціативна пам’ять, розріджений бінарний вектор, мережа Хопфілда, пам’ять Уілшоу, модель Потса, найближчий сусід, пошук за схожістю.
ISSN 2519-2205 (Online), ISSN 0454-9910 (Print). Киб. и выч. техн. 2017. № 2 (188)
View publication stats
35
| 9cs.NE
|
Multi-Rate Control over AWGN Channels via
Analog Joint Source–Channel Coding
arXiv:1609.07715v3 [cs.SY] 28 Oct 2016
Anatoly Khina, Gustav M. Pettersson, Victoria Kostina and Babak Hassibi
Abstract— We consider the problem of controlling an unstable plant over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN)
channel with a transmit power constraint, where the signaling
rate of communication is larger than the sampling rate (for
generating observations and applying control inputs) of the
underlying plant. Such a situation is quite common since
sampling is done at a rate that captures the dynamics of the
plant and which is often much lower than the rate that can be
communicated. This setting offers the opportunity of improving
the system performance by employing multiple channel uses to
convey a single message (output plant observation or control
input). Common ways of doing so are through either repeating
the message, or by quantizing it to a number of bits and then
transmitting a channel coded version of the bits whose length
is commensurate with the number of channel uses per sampled
message. We argue that such “separated source and channel
coding” can be suboptimal and propose to perform joint source–
channel coding. Since the block length is short we obviate
the need to go to the digital domain altogether and instead
consider analog joint source–channel coding. For the case
where the communication signaling rate is twice the sampling
rate, we employ the Archimedean bi-spiral-based Shannon–
Kotel’nikov analog maps to show significant improvement in
stability margins and linear-quadratic Gaussian (LQG) costs
over simple schemes that employ repetition.
Index Terms— Networked control, Gaussian channel, joint
source–channel coding.
I. I NTRODUCTION
Networked control systems, especially those for which
the links connecting the different components of the system
(plant, observer, and controller, say) are noisy, are increasingly finding applications and, as a result have been the
subject of intense recent investigations [1]–[3]. In many of
these applications the rate at which the output of the plant is
sampled and observed, as well as the rate at which control
inputs are applied to the plant, is different from the signaling
rate with which communication occurs. We shall henceforth
A. Khina, V. Kostina and B. Hassibi are with the Dept. of Electrical
Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
(E-mails: {khina, vkostina, hassibi}@caltech.edu).
G. M. Pettersson is with the Dept. of Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44, Stockholm, Sweden
(E-mail: [email protected]).
The work of A. Khina was supported in part by a Fulbright fellowship, Rothschild fellowship and has received funding from the European
Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie
Skłlodowska-Curie grant agreement No 708932.
The work of G. M. Pettersson at Caltech was supported by The Boeing
Company under the SURF program.
The work of B. Hassibi was supported in part by the National Science
Foundation under grants CNS-0932428, CCF-1018927, CCF-1423663 and
CCF-1409204, by a grant from Qualcomm Inc., by NASA’s Jet Propulsion
Laboratory through the President and Directors Fund, and by King Abdullah
University of Science and Technology.
call such systems multi-rate networked control systems. The
rate at which the plant is sampled and controlled is often
governed by how fast the dynamics of the plant is, whereas
the signaling rate of the communication depends on the
bandwidth available, the noise levels, etc. As a result, there
is no inherent reason why these two rates should be related
and, in fact, the communication rate is almost always higher
than the sampling rate.
This latest fact clearly gives us the opportunity to improve
the performance of the system by having the possibility
to convey information about each sampled output of the
plant, and/or each control signal, through multiple uses of
the communication channel. An obvious strategy is to simply
repeat the transmitted signal (so-called repetition coding). In
analog communication this simply adds a linear factor to the
SNR (3 dB for a single repetition); in digital communication
over a memoryless packet erasure link, say, it simply reduces
the probability of packet loss exponentially in the number
of retransmissions. A more sophisticated solution would be
to first quantize the analog message (the sampled output
or the control signal) and then protect the quantized bits
with an error-correcting channel code whose block length is
commensurate with the number of channel uses available per
sample. A yet more sophisticated solution would be to use
a tree code which collectively encodes the quantized bits in
a causal fashion over all channel uses [4]–[6].
The latter two solutions implicitly assume what is called
the “separation between source and channel coding”, i.e.,
that quantization of the messages and channel coding of the
quantized bits (using either a block code or a tree code)
can be done independently of one another. While this is
asymptotically true in communication systems (where it is a
celebrated result), it is not true for control systems where the
overall objective is to minimize a linear-quadratic Gaussian
(LQG) cost [7]. To minimize an LQG cost what is needed
is joint source–channel coding (JSCC). Unfortunately, in its
full generality, this is known to be a notoriously difficult
problem and so it has rarely been attempted (especially, in a
control context). Nonetheless, this is what we shall attempt
in this paper.
We assume the communication links are AWGN (additive
white Gaussian noise) channels with a certain signal-to-noise
ratio (SNR). As we show below, this SNR puts an upper
limit on the size of the maximum unstable eigenvalue of
the plant that can be stabilized. We further assume that the
signaling rate of the communication channel is not much
larger than the sampling rate of the plant, say only a factor
of 2 to 10 larger. Thus, if one sets aside the (daunting) task of
performing coding over multiple messages (a la tree codes)
then one is left with constructing a joint source–channel
code of relatively short length — something that could very
well be feasible. In particular, since both the message and
transmitted signals are analog, in this short block regime it
is not even clear whether it is necessary to go through a
digitization process. Thus, we shall focus on analog JSCC,
originally proposed by Shannon [8] and Kotel’nikov [9],
which can simply be viewed as an appropriately chosen
nonlinear mapping from the analog message to the analog
transmitted signal(s).
Finally, we should mention that we view this work as a
first step and the results as preliminary. Nonetheless, these
already indicate that one can obtain substantial gains (in the
LQG cost) over simple schemes, such as repetition, by using
the ideas mentioned above. The design of more sophisticated
JSCC schemes, as well as a comprehensive comparison of
different schemes will be deferred to future work.
II. P ROBLEM S ETUP
We now formulate the control–communication setting that
will be treated in this work, depicted also in Fig. 1. We
concentrate on the simple case of a scalar full observable
state and a scalar AWGN channel. The model and solutions
can be extended to more complex cases of vector states and
multi-antenna channels.
Consider the scalar system with the plant evolution:
xt+1 = αxt + wt + ut ,
(1)
where xt is the (scalar) state at time t, wt is an AWGN of
power W , α > 1 is a known scalar, and ut is the control
signal. Assume further that x0 is Gaussian with power P0 .
The measured output is equal to the state corrupted by
noise:
y t = x t + vt ,
(2)
where vt is an AWGN of power V .
In contrast to classical control settings, the observer and
the controller are not co-located, and are connected instead
via an AWGN channel
bi = ai + ni ,
(3)
where bi is the channel output, ai is the channel input subject
to a unit power constraint, and ni is an AWGN of power
1/SNR.1
We assume an integer ratio KC between the sample rate
of (2) and the signaling rate over the channel (3). That is,
KC channel uses (3) are available per one control sample (1),
(2).
In this work we further assume that the observer knows all
past control signals {ui |i = 1, . . . , t − 1}; for a discussion
of the case when such information is not available at the
observer, see Section V.
1 This representation is w.l.o.g., as the case of an average power P and
C
noise power N , can always be transformed to an equivalent channel with
average power 1 and
√ noise power N/PC , 1/SNR by multiplying both
sides of (3) by 1/ PC .
vt
wt
Plant
xt
xt+1 = αxt + wt + ut
yt
ut
Channel
Controller/
Receiver
ai Observer/
Transmitter
bi
ni
Fig. 1. Scalar control system with white driving and observation AWGNs
and an AWGN communication channel. The dashed line represents the
assumption that the past control signals are available at the transmitter.
Similarly to the classical LQG control (in which the controller and the observer are co-locatedco-located controller
and observer), we wish to minimize the average stage LQG
cost after the total number of observed samples T :
"
#
T
X
1
2
2
2
Qxt + Rut ,
J¯T , E F xT +1 +
T
t=1
for some non-negative constants F , Q and R, by designing
appropriate operations at the observer [which also plays the
role of the transmitter over (3)] and the controller [which
also serves as the receiver of (3)]. The infinite horizon cost
is defined as
J¯∞ , lim J¯T .
T →∞
To that end, we recall next known results from information
theory for joint source–channel coding design with low delay.
III. L OW-D ELAY J OINT S OURCE –C HANNEL C ODING
In this section, we review known results from information
theory and communications for transmitting an i.i.d. zeromean Gaussian source st of power PS over an AWGN
channel (3).
The number of source samples generated per a time instant
is not necessarily equal to the channel uses of (3) per the
same time. In general, consider the case where KC channel
uses of bi are available for every KS source samples of st .
The goal of the transmitter is to convey the source st to the
receiver with a minimal possible average distortion, where
the appropriate distortion measure for our case of interest is
the mean square error distortion.
To that end, the transmitter applies a mapping E that
transforms every KS source samples to KC channel inputs:
(a1 , . . . , aKC ) = E (s1 , . . . , sKS ) ,
such that the input power constraint is satisfied:
i
1 h
2
E {E (s1 , . . . , sKS )} ≤ 1.
KS
The receiver, upon receiving the KC channel outputs of
(3) — corresponding to the KC transmitted channel inputs —
applies a mapping to these measured outputs to recover
estimates ŝt of the source samples:
(ŝ1 , . . . , ŝKS ) = D (b1 , . . . , bKC ) .
The resulting average distortion of this scheme is
D=
KS
h
i
1 X
2
E (st − ŝt ) ,
KS t=1
and the corresponding (source) signal-to-distortion ratio
(SDR) is defined as
PS
.
D
Our results here are more easily presented in terms of
unbiased errors, as these can be regarded as uncorrelated additive noise in the sequel (when used as part of the developed
control scheme). Therefore, we consider the use of (samplewise) correlation-sense unbiased estimators (CUBE), namely,
estimators that satisfy
SDR ,
SDRlin = 2SNR,
E [st (st − ŝt )] = 0.
We note that any estimator ŝB
t can be transformed into a
CUBE ŝt by multiplying by a suitable constant:
E s2
;
ŝt = tB ŝB
E st ŝt t
for a further discussion of such estimators and their use in
communications the reader is referred to [10].
Shannon’s celebrated result [11] states that the minimal
achievable distortion, using any transmiter–receiver scheme,
is dictated, in the case of a Gaussian source, by2
KS
2
log (1 + SDR) = KS R(D) ≤ KC C =
KC
2
log (1 + SNR)
where R(D) is the rate–distortion function of the source
and C is the channel capacity [11]. Thus, the optimal SDR,
commonly referred to as optimum performance theoretically
achievable (OPTA) SDR, is given by
SDROPTA = (1 + SNR)
For finite blocklengths, (4) cannot be exactly attained, except for specific cases in which the source and the distortion
measure are probabilistically matched to the channel [12],
and strictly tighter outer bounds on the distortion can be
derived [13]–[15]. One eminent case where such a matching
occurs is that of a Gaussian source and a Gaussian channel
with matching number of samples/uses KC = KS . In this
case, sending each source sample as is, up to a possible
power adjustment, proves optimal and achieves (4) with
KC = KS = 1 (and hence also any other positive integer) [16]. Unfortunately, this breaks down when KC 6= KS ,
and consequently led to the proposal and study of various
techniques for low-delay JSCC schemes.3
We next concentrate on the simple case of KS = 1 and
KC = 2. That is, the case in which one source sample is
conveyed over two channel uses.
A naı̈ve approach is to send the source as is over both
channel uses, up to a power adjustment. The corresponding
unbiased SDR in this case is
KC /KS
− 1.
(4)
Shannon’s proof (for a more general case of not necessarily
Gaussian source or channel) is based upon the separation principle, according to which the source samples are
partitioned into blocks and quantized together, resulting in
(approximately) uniform independent bits. These bits are
then partitioned again into blocks and encoded together to
form the channel inputs. At the receiver first the coded bits
are recovered, followed by the reconstruction of the source
samples from these bits.
However, this compression–coding separation-based technique is optimal only in the limit when the blocklengths KS
and KC grow to infinity for a fixed ratio between the two,
which implies, in turn, very large delays.
2 The rate–distortion function here is written in terms of the unbiased
SDR, in contrast to the more common biased SDR expression log(SDR).
a linear improvement rather than an exponential one as in (4).
This scheme approaches (4) for very low SNRs, but suffers
great losses at high SNRs. We note that the linear factor 2
comes from the fact that the total power available over both
channel uses has doubled, and the same performance can be
attained by allocating all of the available power to the first
channel use and remaining silent during the second channel
use.
This suggests that better mappings that truly exploit the
extra channel use can be constructed. The first to propose an improvement for the 1:2 case were Shannon [8]
and Kotel’nikov [9], in the late 1940s. In their works,
the source sample is viewed as a point on a singledimensional line, whereas the two channel uses correspond
to a two-dimensional space. In these terms, the linear scheme
corresponds to mapping the one-dimensional source line
to a straight line in the two-dimensional channel space
(see Fig. 2), and hence clearly cannot provide any improvement (since AWGN is invariant to rotations). However,
by mapping the one-dimensional source line into a twodimensional curve that fills better the space, a great boost
in performance can be attained. Specifically, consider the
Archimedean bi-spiral, which was considered in several
works [17]–[20] (depicted in Fig. 2):
(
reg
areg
s cos(ωs)
= creg |s| cos(ω|s|) sign(s)
1 (s) = c
reg
a2 (s) = creg s sin(ωs) sign(s) = creg |s| sin(ω|s|) sign(s)
(5)
where ω determines the rotation frequency, the factor creg
is chosen to satisfy the power constraint, and the sign(s)
term is needed to avoid overlap of the curve for positive and
3 The term JSCC is somewhat misleading, as in many of these schemes
there is no use of digital components, let alone coding, including the
Shannon–Kotel’nikov (SK) maps which are described in detail and used
in the sequel.
mance (4) for a specific design SNR (4), and improve linearly
for higher SNRs. Similar behavior is observed also in Fig. 3
where the optimal ω value varies with the (design) SNR, and
mimics closely the quadratic growth in the SDR. Above the
design SNR, linear growth is achieved for a particular choice
of ω.
We further note that the distortion component incurred
when a threshold event happens, grows with |s|. To avoid
stretch
this behavior, instead of increasing the
magnitude a
stretch
proportionally to the phase ∠ a
as in (6), we increase
it slightly faster at a pace that guarantees that the incurred
distortion does not grow with |s|:
(
abounded
(s) = cbounded |s|λβ cos ω|s|λ sign(s)
1
(7)
abounded
(s) = cbounded |s|λβ sin ω|s|λ sign(s)
2
Fig. 2.
Linear repetition and Archimedean spiral curves.
negative values of s (for each of which now corresponds
a distinct spiral, and the two meet only at the origin).
This spiral allows to effectively improve the resolution w.r.t.
small noise values, since the one-dimensional source line is
effectively stretched compared to the noise, and hence the
noise magnitude shrinks when the source curve is mapped
(contracted) back. However, for large noise values, a jump to
a different branch — referred to as a threshold effect — may
occur, incurring a large distortion. Thus, the value ω needs
to be chosen to be as large as possible to allow maximal
stretching of the curve for the same given power, while
maintaining a low threshold event probability. The SDRs for
different values of ω are depicted in Fig. 3a.
Another ingredient that is used in conjunction with (5)
is stretching s prior to mapping it to a bi-spiral using
φλ (s) , sign(s)|s|λ :
(
stretch
astretch
(s) = areg
|s|λ cos ω|s|λ sign(s)
1
1 (φλ (s)) = c
stretch
astretch
(s) = areg
|s|λ sin ω|s|λ sign(s)
2
2 (φλ (s)) = c
(6)
The choice λ = 0.5 promises great boost in performance
in the region of high SNRs, as is seen in Fig. 3b. We further
note that although the optimal decoder is a minimum mean
square error (MMSE) estimator E [s|b1 , b2 ], in this case,
the maximum-likelihood (ML) decoder, p(b1 , b2 |s), achieves
similar performance for moderate and high SNRs. A joint
optimization of λ and ω for each SNR, for both ML and
MMSE decoding, was carried out in [19] and is depicted in
Fig. 3.
A desired property of the linear JSCC schemes is their
SDR proportional improvement with the channel SNR
(“SNR universality”). Such an improvement is not allowed
by the separation-based technique, as it fails when the actual
SNR is lower than the design SNR, and does not promise any
improvement for SNRs above it. This motivated much work
in designing JSCC schemes whose performance improves
with the SNR, even for the case of large blocklengths [21]–
[23]. The schemes in these works achieve optimal perfor-
for some β > 1. This has only a slight effect on the resulting
SDRs, as is illustrated in Fig. 3.
Finally note that in no way do we claim that the spiralbased Shannon–Kotel’nikov (SK) scheme is optimal. Various
other techniques exist, most using a hybrid of digital and analog components [24]–[26], which outperform the spiral-based
scheme for various parameters. Nevertheless, this scheme
is the earliest technique to be considered and gives good
performance boosts which suffice for our demonstration.
IV. C ONTROL VIA L OW-D ELAY JSCC
In this section we construct a Kalman-filter-like solution [27] by employing JSCC schemes. We note that the
additional complication here is due to the communication
channel (3) and its inherent input power constraint.
Denote by x̂rt1 |t2 the estimate of xt1 at the receiver given
{bi |i = 1, . . . , t2 }, where ‘r’ stands for ‘receiver’, and by
x̂tt1 |t2 the estimate of xt1 given {yi |i = 1, . . . , t2 }, where ‘t’
stands for ‘transmitter’. Denote
their mean square
erh further
i
h
i
rors (MSEs) by Ptr1 |t2 , E x̃rt1 |t2 and Ptt1 |t2 , E x̃tt1 |t2 ,
where x̃tt1 |t2 , xt1 − x̂tt1 |t2 and x̃rt1 |t2 , xt1 − x̂rt1 |t2 .
Then, the scheme works as follows. At time instant t, the
controller constructs an estimate x̂rt|t of xt . It then applies the
control signal ut = −Lt x̂rt|t to the plant, for a pre-determined
gain Lt 6= 0. Note that, since both the controller and the
observer know the previously applied control signals {uj |j =
1, . . . , t}, they also know x̂rt|t and x̂rt+1|t .
Hence, in order to describe xt , the controller aims to
convey its best estimate of the state x̂tt|t . To that end, it
can save transmit power by transmitting the error signal
(x̂tt|t − x̂rt|t−1 ), instead of x̂tt|t . The controller can then add
back x̂rt|t−1 to the received signal to construct x̂rt|t .
Remark 1: Note that even in the case of a fully observable
state, i.e., when V = 0, the state is corrupted by nt when
conveyed over the AWGN channel (3) to the controller. The
performance of the transmission and the estimation processes
applied by the observer and the controller, respectively,
determine in turn, the total effective observation noise.
The general scheme used throughout this work is detailed
below.
•
Sends the KC channel inputs ai over the channel (3).
Controller/Receiver: At time t
• Receives the KC channel outputs bi corresponding to
time sample t.
ˆt = s̄t +neff
• Recovers a CUBE of the source signal s̄t : s̄
t ,
eff
where nt ⊥ s̄t is an additive noise of power of (at
most) 1/SDR0 .
ˆt to construct an estimate of st :
• Unnormalizes s̄
q
t s̄
r
ˆt
(10a)
− Pt|t
ŝt = Pt|t−1
q
r
t
= Pt|t−1
− Pt|t
s̄t + neff
(10b)
t
q
t neff . (10c)
r
− Pt|t
= x̂tt|t − x̂rt|t−1 + Pt|t−1
t
•
(a) λ = 1.
Constructs an estimate x̂rt|t of xt from all received
channel outputs until and including at time t. Since
ŝt ⊥ x̂rt|t−1 , the linear MMSE estimate amounts to4
x̂rt|t = x̂rt|t−1 +
SDR0
ŝt ,
1 + SDR0
(11)
with an MSE of
1
r
t
Pt|t−1
+ SDR0 Pt|t
.
1 + SDR0
Generates the control signal (Lt is given next):
r
Pt|t
=
•
(12)
ut = −Lt x̂rt|t ,
and the receiver prediction of the next system state
x̂rt|t−1 = αx̂rt−1|t−1 + ut−1 .
(b) λ = 0.5.
Fig. 3. Performances of the JSCC linear repetition scheme, OPTA bound,
and the JSCC SK spiral scheme for optimized λ and ω, for the standard case
(β = 1) and distortion-bounded case. The solid lines depict the performance
of the standard spiral for various values of ω for two stretch parameters
λ = 0.5 and 1, which perform better at high and low SNRs, respectively.
Observer/Transmitter: At time t
• Generates the desired error signal
•
•
St =
α2 R St+1
+ Q,
St+1 + R
(13b)
ST = F .
(13c)
Using (12) and (1), the prediction error at the decoder is
given by the following recursion:
α2
r
t
r
Pt+1|t
=
Pt|t−1
+ SDR0 Pt|t
+ W. (14)
1 + SDR0
Scheme 1:
st = x̂tt|t − x̂rt|t−1
(8a)
= x̃rt|t−1 − x̃tt|t
(8b)
r
Pt|t−1
The control (LQG) signal gain Lt is given by (see, e.g.,
[27]):
αSt+1
,
(13a)
Lt =
St+1 + R
t
Pt|t
of average power
−
(determined in the
sequel).
Since the channel input is subject to a unit power
constraint, st is normalized:
1
s̄t = q
st .
(9)
r
t
Pt|t−1
− Pt|t
Constructs KC channel inputs ai corresponding to s̄t ,
using a bounded-distortion JSCC scheme of choice of
rate ratio 1 : KC with (maximum given any input)
average distortion 1/SDR0 for the given channel SNR.
The estimates x̂tt|t can be generated via Kalman filtering
(see, e.g., [27]):
ỹt = yt − αx̂tt−1|t−1 − ut−1 ,
x̂tt|t
=
αx̂tt−1|t−1
+ ut−1 +
Ktt ỹt
(15a)
,
(15b)
where the Kalman filter coefficients are generated via the
recursion [27]:
Ktt
=
t
Pt|t−1
t
Pt|t−1
+V
,
(16a)
4 If the resulting effective noise neff is not an AWGN with power that
t
does not depend on the channel input, then a better estimator than that in
(11) may be constructed.
t
t
= α2 Pt|t−1
1 − Ktt + W,
Pt+1|t
t
Pt|t
=
Ktt V.
(16b)
(16c)
The recursive relations (14) and (16) lead to the following
condition for the stabilizability of the control system.
Theorem 1 (Achievable): The scalar control system of
Section II is stabilizable using Scheme 1 if α2 < 1 + SDR0 ,
and its infinite-horizon average stage LQG cost J¯r is upper
bounded by
Q + α2 − 1 S
P t − P̄ t ,
(17a)
J¯r ≤ J¯t +
2
1 + SDR0 − α
J¯t = QP̄ t + S P t − P̄ t ,
(17b)
where J¯t is the average stage cost achievable at the observer,5 and P t and P̄ t are the infinite-horizon values of
t
t
Pt|t−1
and Pt|t
, respectively; S and P t are given as the
positive solutions of
S 2 − Q + α2 − 1 R S − QR = 0
and
Pt
2
−
α2 − 1 V + W P t − V W = 0
respectively, and
P tV
.
Pt + V
The following theorem is an adaptation of the lower bound
in [28] to our setting of interest.
Theorem 2 (Lower bound): The scalar control system of
Section II is stabilizable only if α2 < 1 + SDROPTA , and
the optimal achievable infinite-horizon average stage LQG
cost is lower bounded by
Q + α2 − 1 S
r
t
¯
¯
J ≥J +
P t − P̄ t , (18)
1 + SDROPTA − α2
P̄ t =
where P t , P̄ t and S are as in Theorem 1, and SDROPTA is
given in (4).
By comparing (17a) and (18) we see that the possible gap
between the two bounds stems from the gap between the
bounds on the achievable SDR over the AWGN channel (3).
It is interesting to note that in this case, in stark contrast to
the classical LQG setting in which the system is stabilizable
for any values of α, V and W , low values of SDR render
the system unstable. Hence, it provides, among others, the
minimal required transmit power for the system to remain
stable. The difference from the classical LQG case stems
from the additional input power constraint, which effectively
couples the power of the observation noise with that of the
estimation error, and was previously observed in, e.g., [7],
[28]–[30] for the fully-observed setting.
Remark 2: In the limit SNR → ∞, we attain also
SDR → ∞. In this case, the estimate (11) and the prediction
error (14) at the decoder coincide with those at the encoder,
(15b) and (16b), respectively, recovering the renowned results of classical (without a communication channel) LQG
control.
5 Alternatively,
Fig. 4. Optimal average stage LQG cost J¯r of a single representative run
for KC = KS = 1, α = 2, and SNRs 2 and 4 which correspond to a
stabilizable and an unstabilizable systems. The driving noise and observation
noise powers and the LQG penalty coefficients are Q = R = F = W =
V = 1.
this is the cost J¯r in the limit SNR → ∞.
We next discuss the special cases of KC = 1 and
KC = 2 channel uses per sample in Sections IV-A and IV-B,
respectively.
A. Source–Channel Rate Match
In this subsection we treat the case of KC = 1, namely,
where the sample rate of the control system and the signaling
rate of the communication channel match.
As we saw in Section III, analog linear transmission
of a Gaussian source over an AWGN channel achieves
optimal performance (even when infinite delay is allowed),
namely, the OPTA SDR (4), and given any input value.
Thus, the JSCC scheme that we use in this case is linear
transmission — the source is transmitted as is, up to a power
adjustment [recall (8) and (9)]:
at = s̄t
1
=q
st .
r
t
Pt|t−1
− Pt|t
Since in this case SDR0 = SDROPTA , the upper and
lower bounds of Theorems 1 and 2 coincide, establishing
the optimum performance in this case.
Corollary 1: The scalar control system of Section II with
KC = KS = 1 is stabilizable if only if α2 < 1 + SNR, and
the optimal achievable infinite-horizon average stage LQG
cost satisfies (17a) with equality where SDR0 = SNR.
Remark 3: The stabilizability condition and optimum
MMSE performance were previously established in [29], [30]
for the case of no observation noise V = 0.
The optimal averate stage LQG cost is illustrated in Fig. 4,
where the normalized in time LQG cost J¯r is evaluated for
a system with α = 2 and two SNRs — 2 and 4. SNR = 4
satisfies the stabilizability condition α2 < 1 + SNR, whereas
SNR = 2 fails to do so. Unit LQG penalty coefficients
Fig. 5. Average stage LQG costs when using the (distortion-bounded) SK
Archimedean bi-spiral, repetition and the lower bound of Theorem 2 for
α = 3, W = 1, V = 0, Q = 1, R = 0. The vertical dotted lines represent
the minimum SNR below which the cost diverges to infinity.
Q = R = F = 1 and unit driving noise and observation
noise powers W = V = 1 are used.
B. Source–Channel Rate Mismatch
We now consider the case of KC = 2 channel uses
per sample. As we saw in Section III, linear schemes are
suboptimal outside the low-SNR region. Instead, by using
non-linear maps, e.g., the (modified) Arcimedean spiralbased SK maps (7), better performance can be achieved.
We note that the improvement in the SDR of the JSCC
scheme is substantial when α2 is of the order of SDR.
That is, when the SDR of the linear scheme is close to
α2 −1, using an improved scheme with better SDR improves
substantially the LQG cost. Unfortunately, the spiral-based
SK schemes do not promise any improvement for SNRs
below 5dB under maximum-likelihood (ML) decoding.
Remark 4: By replacing the ML decoder with an MMSE
one, strictly better performance can be achieved over the
linear scheme for all SNR values.
The effect of the SDR improvement is illustrated in Fig. 5
for a fully-observable (V = 0) system with α = 3 and
W = 1, for Q = 1 and R = 0, by comparing the achievable
costs and lower bound of Theorems 1 and 2.
Remark 5: The resulting effective noise at the output of
the JSCC receiver is not necessarily Gaussian, and hence
the resulting system states xt , are not necessarily Gaussian
either. Nevertheless, for the bounded-distortion scheme (7),
this has no effect on the resulting performance.
V. D ISCUSSION AND F UTURE R ESEARCH
In this paper we considered the simplest case of scalar systems, and KS = 1 and KC = 2. Clearly, an (exponentially)
large gain in performance can be achieved for KC > 2.
We further note that the results of Theorems 1 and 2
readily extend to systems with vector states xt and vector
control signals ut but scalar observed outputs yt .
Interestingly, for the case of vector observed, state and
control signals, even if the signaling rate of the channel
and the sample rate of the observer are equal (rate matched
case), conveying several analog observations over a single
channel input may be of the essence. This is achieved by a
compression JSCC scheme, e.g., by reversing the roles of the
source and the channel inputs in the SK spiral-based scheme
and similarly promises exponentially growing gains with the
SNR and dimension; see [8], [9], [17]–[19], [26], [31].
In this work, we assumed that the observer knows all
past control signals. This case can be viewed as a two-sided
side-information scenario. Nevertheless, although this is a
common situation in practice, there are scenarios in which
the observer is oblivious of the control signal applied or
has only a noisy measurement of control signal generated
by the controller. Such settings can be regarded as a JSCC
problem with side information at the receiver (only), and
can be treated using JSCC techniques designed for this case,
some of which combine naturally with the JSCC schemes for
rate mismatch [25], [26], [32]. In fact, this idea was recently
applied for the related problem of communication over an
AWGN channel with AWGN feedback in [33]
Finally, note that for the case of bounded noise (even
worst-case/arbitrary bounded noise), using Hilbert curves
(see, e.g., [17]) can provide a desirable solution and is
extendable for any 1 : KC and KS : 1 rate ratios.
R EFERENCES
[1] J. P. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi, and U. Xu, “A survey of recent
results in networked control systems,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 95, pp. 138–
162, 2007.
[2] V. Gupta, A. F. Dana, J. P. Hespanha, R. M. Murray, and B. Hassibi,
“Data transmission over networks for estimation and control,” IEEE
Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1807–1819, Aug. 2009.
[3] L. Schenato, B. Sinopoli, M. Franceschetti, K. Poola, and S. S. Sastry,
“Foundations of control and estimation over lossy networks,” Proc.
IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 163–187, Jan. 2007.
[4] A. Sahai and S. K. Mitter, “The necessity and sufficiency of anytime
capacity for stabilization of a linear system over a noisy communication link—part I: Scalar systems,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52,
no. 8, pp. 3369–3395, Aug. 2006.
[5] R. T. Sukhavasi and B. Hassibi, “Error correcting codes for distributed
control,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, accepted, Jan. 2016.
[6] A. Khina, W. Halbawi, and B. Hassibi, “(Almost) practical tree codes,”
in Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. on Inf. Theory (ISIT), Barcelona, Spain, July
2016.
[7] S. Tatikonda, A. Sahai, and S. K. Mitter, “Stochastic linear control
over a communication channel,” IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 49,
no. 89, pp. 1549–1561, Sep. 2004.
[8] C. E. Shannon, “Communication in the presence of noise,” IRE Trans.
Info. Theory, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 10–21, Jan. 1949.
[9] V. A. Kotel’nikov, The Theory of Optimum Noise Immunity. New
York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.
[10] Y. Kochman, A. Khina, U. Erez, and R. Zamir, “Rematch-andforward: Joint source/channel coding for parallel relaying with spectral
mismatch,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 605–622, 2014.
[11] C. E. Shannon, “A mathematical theory of communication,” Bell Sys.
Tech. Jour., vol. Vol. 27, pp. 379–423, July 1948.
[12] M. Gastpar, B. Rimoldi, and M. Vetterli, “To code, or not to code:
Lossy source–channel communication revisited,” IEEE Trans. Inf.
Theory, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1147–1158, May 2003.
[13] J. Ziv and M. Zakai, “On functionals satisfying a data-processing
theorem,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 1973.
[14] A. Ingber, I. Leibowitz, R. Zamir, and M. Feder, “Distortion lower
bounds for finite dimensional joint source–channel coding,” in Proc.
IEEE Int. Symp. on Inf. Theory (ISIT), Toronto, Canada, July 2008.
[15] S. Tridenski, R. Zamir, and A. Ingber, “The Ziv–Zakai–Rényi bound
for joint source–channel coding,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 61,
no. 8, pp. 4293–4315, Aug. 2015.
[16] T. Goblick, “Theoretical limitations on the transmission of data from
analog sources,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 11, pp. 558–567, 1965.
[17] S. Y. Chung, “On the construction of some capacity-approaching coding schemes,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. EECS, Massachusetts Institute
of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2000.
[18] F. Hekland, P. A. Floor, and T. A. Ramstad, “Shannon–Kotel’nikov
mappings in joint source–channel coding,” IEEE Trans. Comm.,
vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 94–105, Jan. 2009.
[19] Y. Hu, J. Garcia-Frias, and M. Lamarca, “Analog joint source–channel
coding using non-linear curves and MMSE decoding,” IEEE Trans.
Comm., vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 3016–3026, Nov. 2011.
[20] I. Kvecher and D. Rephaeli, “An analog modulation using a spiral
mapping,” in Proc. IEEE Conv. Electrical and Electron. Engineers in
Israel (IEEEI), Eilat, Israel, Nov. 2006.
[21] U. Mittal and N. Phamdo, “Hybrid digital-analog (HDA) joint source–
channel codes for broadcasting and robust communications,” IEEE
Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1082–1102, May 2002.
[22] Z. Reznic, M. Feder, and R. Zamir, “Distortion bounds for broadcasting with bandwidth expansion,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 52,
no. 8, pp. 3778–3788, Aug. 2006.
[23] Y. Kochman and R. Zamir, “Analog matching of colored sources to
colored channels,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3180–
3195, June 2011.
[24] M. Kleiner and B. Rimoldi, “Asymptotically optimal joint source–
channel with minimal delay,” in Proc. IEEE Globecom, Honolulu, HI,
USA, Nov./Dec. 2009.
[25] X. Chen and E. Tuncel, “Zero-delay joint source–channel coding using
hybrid digital–analog schemes in the Wyner–Ziv setting,” IEEE Trans.
Comm., vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 726–735, Feb. 2014.
[26] E. Akyol, K. B. Viswanatha, K. Rose, and T. A. Ramstad, “On zerodelay source–channel coding,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 60, no. 12,
pp. 7473–7489, Dec. 2014.
[27] D. P. Bertsekas, Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, 2nd ed.
Belmont, MA, USA: Athena Scientific, 2000, vol. I.
[28] V. Kostina and B. Hassibi, “Rate–cost tradeoffs in control,” in Proc.
Annual Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control, and Comput., Monticello,
IL, USA, Sep. 2016.
[29] J. S. Freudenberg, R. H. Middleton, and V. Solo, “Stabilization and
disturbance attenuation over a Gaussian communication channel,”
IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 795–799, Mar. 2010.
[30] J. S. Freudenberg, R. H. Middleton, and J. H. Braslavsky, “Stabilization and disturbance attenuation over a Gaussian communication
channel,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decision and Control (CDC), New
Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. 2007, pp. 3958–3963.
[31] A. Ingber and M. Feder, “Power preserving 2:1 bandwidth reduction
mappings,” in Proc. of the Data Comp. Conf., Snowbird, UT, USA,
Mar. 1997.
[32] Y. Kochman and R. Zamir, “Joint Wyner-Ziv/dirty-paper coding by
modulo-lattice modulation,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 55, pp.
4878–4899, Nov. 2009.
[33] A. Ben-Yishai and O. Shayevitz, “The Gaussian channel with noisy
feedback: Near-capacity performance via simple interaction,” in Proc.
Annual Allerton Conf. on Comm., Control, and Comput., Monticello,
IL, USA, Oct. 2014, pp. 152–159.
| 3cs.SY
|
arXiv:1711.09860v1 [math.GR] 27 Nov 2017
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
ANATOLE CASTELLA
Abstract. Lawrence-Krammer representations are an important family of
linear representations of Artin-Tits groups of small type, which are known,
under some assumptions on the parameters, to be faithful when the type is
spherical (or more generally when they are restricted to the Artin-Tits monoid)
and irreducible when the type is connected.
Here, we investigate an analogue of these representations — introduced by
Digne in the spherical cases — for every Artin-Tits monoid that appears as
the submonoid of fixed points of an Artin-Tits monoid of small type under a
group of graph automorphisms, and for the corresponding Artin-Tits group.
Under the same assumptions on the parameters as in the small type cases,
we first show that these so-called “twisted Lawrence-Krammer representations”
are faithful, and we then prove, by computing their formulas when the group
of graph automorphisms is of order two or three, their irreducibility in all the
spherical and connected cases but one.
Introduction
Lawrence-Krammer representations (shortened to LK-representations in what
follows) are a family of linear representations of Artin-Tits monoids and groups of
small type, introduced by Lawrence [17] and Krammer [15] for the braid groups,
and intensively studied since then (see the references listed below).
Under some assumptions on the defining ring and on the parameters (see condition (⋆) of theorem 6 below), they are known to be faithful for the monoids
[16, 1, 8, 12, 22, 14, 6] which ensure their faithfulness for the groups when the type
is spherical, irreducible when the type is connected [23, 18, 7, 6], and have proved
to be useful in the study of several other properties of Artin-Tits groups [18] and
related objects [7, 19].
It is therefore an interesting question to ask if there exists some analogous linear
representations for Artin-Tits monoids and groups of non-small type.
In [12, end of section 3], Digne defines such objects for Artin-Tits monoids and
groups of spherical type Bn , F4 and G2 , using the fact that they appear as the
submonoids and subgroups of fixed points of Artin-Tits monoids and groups of
small and spherical type (namely of type A2n−1 , E6 and D4 respectively) under the
action of a graph automorphism.
These new linear representations — that I call “twisted” LK-representations —
share the same good combinatorial properties with respect to the associated root
systems as in the small type cases, and Digne proves their faithfulness for his choice
of parameters in [12, Cor. 3.11].
Date: November 28, 2017.
1
2
ANATOLE CASTELLA
The aim of this article is to generalize this construction to every Artin-Tits
monoid that appears as the submonoid of fixed elements of an Artin-Tits monoid
of small type under a group of graph automorphisms, and to the associated ArtinTits group.
Under the same condition (⋆) on the defining ring and on the parameters as
in the small type cases, we prove their faithfulness for the monoids, which again
ensure their faithfulness for the groups when the type is spherical, and we prove
their irreducibility for all the connected and spherical types but one.
The paper is organized as follows.
We recall the basic needed notions on Coxeter groups, Artin-tits monoids an
groups, standard root systems and graph automorphisms in section 1.
We recall the definition and the main properties of LK-representations in the
small type cases, as stated in [6], in subsection 2.1, and turn to the definition of
the twisted LK-representations in subsection 2.2. We prove our faithfulness result
in subsection 2.3 (theorem 13).
We explicit the formulas of these twisted LK-representations when the group of
graph automorphisms is of order two or three in section 3.
We use these formulas in section 4 to study the spherical cases. We prove our
irreducibility result in subsection 4.1 (theorem 35), and conclude in subsection 4.2
by giving a sufficient condition on the parameters for non-equivalence in the family
of twisted LK-representations of a given type.
1. Coxeter matrices and related objects
A Coxeter matrix is a matrix Γ = (mi,j )i,j∈I over an arbitrary set I with mi,j =
mj,i ∈ N>1 ∪ {∞}, and mi,j = 1 ⇔ i = j for all i, j ∈ I.
As usual, we encode the data of Γ by its Coxeter graph, i.e. the graph with
vertex set I, an edge between the vertices i and j if mi,j > 3, and a label mi,j on
that edge when mi,j > 4.
We say that a Coxeter matrix Γ is connected when so is its Coxeter graph.
In this paper, we will always assume that I is finite. This condition could be
removed at the cost of some refinements in certain statements below (see [4, Ch. 11]
for some of them), which are left to the reader.
1.1. Coxeter groups and Artin-Tits monoids and groups.
To a Coxeter matrix Γ = (mi,j )i,j∈I , we associate the Coxeter group W = WΓ ,
the Artin-Tits group B = BΓ and the Artin-Tits monoid B + = BΓ+ , given by the
following presentations :
W
=
h si , i ∈ I | si sj si · · · = sj si sj · · · if mi,j 6= ∞, and s2i = 1 i,
| {z } | {z }
mi,j terms
B
=
h si , i ∈ I | si sj si · · · = sj si sj · · · if mi,j 6= ∞ i,
| {z } | {z }
mi,j terms
B
+
=
mi,j terms
mi,j terms
h si , i ∈ I | si sj si · · · = sj si sj · · · if mi,j 6= ∞ i+ .
| {z } | {z }
mi,j terms
mi,j terms
We denote by ℓ the length function on W and on B + relatively to their generating
sets {si , i ∈ I} and {si , i ∈ I} respectively.
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
3
We denote by 4 the left divisibility in the monoid B + , i.e. for g, h ∈ B + , we
write h 4 g if there exists h′ ∈ B + such that g = hh′ . This leads to the natural
notions of left gcd ’s and right lcm’s in B + .
Let J be a subset of I. We denote by ΓJ the submatrix (mi,j )i,j∈J of Γ and by
WJ the subgroup hsj , j ∈ Ji of W . We say that J and ΓJ are spherical if WJ is
finite, or equivalently if the elements sj , j ∈ J, have a common right multiple in
B + (see [3, Thm. 5.6]). In that case, there exists a unique element rJ of maximal
length in WJ , and the elements sj (j ∈ J) have a unique right lcm in B + that we
denote by ∆J (see [3, Props. 4.1 and 5.7]).
1.2. Standard root system.
We refer the reader to [11] for the basic notions on standard root systems.
We denote by Φ = ΦΓ = {w(αi ) | w ∈ W, i ∈ I} the standard root system
associated with Γ in the real vector space E = ⊕i∈I Rαi , where the action of W on
E
is defined, for a generator si and a basis element αj , by si (αj ) = αj +2 cos mπi,j αi .
T
It is known that Φ = Φ+ ⊔ Φ− , where Φ+ = Φ (⊕i∈I R+ αi ) and Φ− = −Φ+ .
As in [6], we will represent Φ+ — and any of its subsets — as a graded graph,
where two elements α and β of Φ+ are linked by an edge labeled i if α = si (β), and
where the grading is by the depth function on Φ+ defined, for α ∈ Φ+ , by
dp(α) = min{ℓ(w) | w ∈ W such that w(α) ∈ Φ− }.
By convention in those graded graphs, we choose to place roots of great depth above
roots of small depth, so edges like the following ones will all mean that α = si (β)
and dp(β) > dp(α) :
sβ
sβ
sβ
i
❏i
i✡
✡
sα
, s α , ❏s α . . .
In particular in section 3, we will focus on some particular subsets of Φ+ , closure
of subsets of Φ+ under the action of some subgroup WJ of W , that we call, after
Hée, meshes :
Notation
For J ⊆ I, we call J-mesh of a subset Ψ of Φ+ the set MJ (Ψ) =
T 1.
+
WJ (Ψ) Φ = {w(α) | w ∈ WJ , α ∈ Ψ such that w(α) ∈ Φ+ }.
1.3. Graph automorphisms.
We call graph automorphism of a Coxeter matrix Γ = (mi,j )i,j∈I every permutation σ of I such that mσ(i),σ(j) = mi,j for all i, j ∈ I, and we denote by Aut(Γ)
the group they constitute.
Any graph automorphism σ of Γ acts by an automorphism on W (resp. on B
and B + ) by permuting the generating set {si | i ∈ I} (resp. {si | i ∈ I}).
If Σ is a subgroup of Aut(Γ), we denote by W Σ (resp. B Σ , resp. (B + )Σ ) the
subgroup of W (resp. subgroup of B, resp. submonoid of B + ) of fixed points
under the action of the elements of Σ. It is known that W Σ (resp. (B + )Σ ) is
a Coxeter group (resp. Artin-Tits monoid), and that the analogue holds for B Σ
when Γ is spherical, or more generally of FC-type (see [13, 21] for the Coxeter case,
[20, 9, 10, 5] for the Artin-Tits case).
More precisely, if we denote by I Σ the set of spherical orbits of I under Σ, then
Σ
W (resp. (B + )Σ , and B Σ when Γ is of FC-type) has a Coxeter (resp. ArtinTits) presentation associated with a Coxeter matrix ΓΣ = (mΣ
J,K )J,K∈I Σ easily
4
ANATOLE CASTELLA
computable from Γ, where the generators are the elements rJ (resp. ∆J ) for J
running through I Σ (see for example [9, 10, 5]).
Similarly, any graph automorphism σ of Γ acts by a linear automorphism on the
vector space E = ⊕i∈I Rαi by permuting the basis (αi )i∈I . This action stabilizes Φ
and Φ+ , and the induced action on those sets is w(αi ) 7→ (σ(w))(ασ(i) ).
It is easily seen on the definition that the action of Aut(Γ) on Φ+ thus defined
respects the depth function on Φ+ . In particular, we can define the depth of an
orbit Θ of Φ+ under Σ as the depth of any element α ∈ Θ.
2. Twisted Lawrence-Krammer representations
From now on, we fix a Coxeter matrix Γ = (mi,j )i,j∈I of small type, i.e. with
mi,j ∈ {2, 3} for all i, j ∈ I with i 6= j.
2.1. Lawrence-Krammer representations - the small type case.
Let R be a (unitary) commutative ring and V be a free R-module with basis
(eα )α∈Φ+ . We denote by V ⋆ the dual of V and by R× the group of units of R.
For f ∈ V ⋆ and e ∈ V , we denote by f ⊗ e the endomorphism of V defined by
v 7→ f (v)e.
4
Definition 2 ([6, Def. 7]). For (a, b, c, d) ∈ R and i ∈ I, we denote by ϕi =
ϕi,(a,b,c,d) the endomorphism of V given on the basis (eα )α∈Φ+ by
ϕi (eα ) = 0
if α = αi ,
ϕ (e ) = de
if α s ✐i ,
i α
α
(
β s
ϕi (eβ ) = beα
i in Φ+ .
if
ϕi (eα ) = aeα + ceβ
αs
For a linear form fi ∈ V ⋆ , we define the Lawrence-Krammer map — or the
LK-map for short — associated with (a, b, c, d) and fi to be the endomorphism
ψi = ψi,(a,b,c,d),fi of V given by ψi = ϕi + fi ⊗ eαi .
Proposition 3 ([6, Lem. 9 and Prop. 12]). Assume that d2 − ad − bc = 0 and that
the family (fi )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I satisfies the following properties :
(i) for i, j ∈ I with i 6= j, fi (eαj ) = 0,
(ii) for i, j ∈ I with mi,j = 2, fi ϕj = dfi ,
(iii) for i, j ∈ I with mi,j = 3, fi ϕj = fj ϕi .
Then si 7→ ψi defines a linear representation ψ : B + → L (V ). Moreover if b, c,
d and fi (eαi ), i ∈ I, belong to R× , then the image of ψ is included in GL(V ) and
hence ψ induces a linear representation ψgp : B → GL(V ).
Definition 4 ([6, Def. 11]). We call LK-family (relatively to (a, b, c, d)) any family
(fi )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I satisfying conditions (i), (ii) and (iii) of proposition 3 above, and
we call LK-representation (relatively to (a, b, c, d) and (fi )i∈I ) the induced representation ψ and, when appropriate, ψgp .
Remark 5. When b is invertible in R, an LK-family (fi )i∈I necessarily satisfies
fi (eαi ) = fj (eαj ) for every i, j ∈ I with mi,j = 3 (see [6, Prop. 34]). In particular
when Γ is connected, we thus get that the elements fi (eαi ), i ∈ I, are all equal. For
sake of brevity when this is the case, we will simply denote by f the common value
of the fi (eαi ), i ∈ I.
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
5
Moreover when Γ is connected and spherical, one can show that the LK-family
(fi )i∈I is entirely determined by this common value f (see [6, Section 3.2]).
The first main properties of these representations can be stated as follows :
Theorem 6 ([6, Thm. A]). Let ψ : B + → L (V ) be an LK-representation over R
associated with parameters (a, b, c, d) ∈ R4 and (fi )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I . Assume that the
following condition holds :
(⋆) R is an integral domain, fi (eαi ) 6= 0 for all i ∈ I, and there exists a totally
ordered integral domain R0 and a ring homomorphism ρ : R → R0 , such
that ρ(t) > 0 for t ∈ {a, b, c, d}, and Im(fi ) ⊆ ker(ρ) for all i ∈ I.
By extension of the scalars from R to its field of fractions K, consider ψ as acting
on the K-vector space VK = K ⊗R V . Then ψ has its image included in GL(VK ),
hence induces an LK-representation ψgp : B → GL(VK ), and the following holds.
(i) The LK-representation ψ is faithful, and so is ψgr if Γ is spherical.
(ii) If Γ is connected, the LK-representations ψ and ψgp are irreducible on VK .
(iii) Assume that Γ has at least one edge and that ψ ′ is an LK-representation
of B + associated with parameters (a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ ) ∈ R4 and (fi′ )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I
that satisfy the conditions of the preamble for the fixed ρ. Then if a′ 6= a,
or if d′ 6= d or if fi′ (eαi ) 6= fi (eαi ) for some i ∈ I, the LK-representations
ψ and ψ ′ are not equivalent on VK .
2.2. Definition of the twisted Lawrence-Krammer representations.
Let us fix a subgroup Σ of Aut(Γ) and an LK-representation ψ : B + → L (V ),
g 7→ ψg , of B + associated with an LK-family (fi )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I .
Recall that Σ naturally acts on B + , and that the submonoid (B + )Σ of fixed
points of B + under Σ is the Artin-Tits monoid BΓ+Σ associated with a certain
Coxeter matrix ΓΣ (see subsection 1.3).
Moreover, Σ acts on Φ+ and this action induces an action of Σ on V by permutation of the basis (eα )α∈Φ+ , which we denote by Σ → GL(V ), σ 7→ σV . We denote
by V Σ the submodule of fixed points of V under the action of Σ.
Let us denote by ϕ : B + → L (V ), g 7→ ϕg , the LK-representation of B +
associated with the trivial LK-family (i.e. where fi is the zero form for all i ∈ I).
Lemma 7. For all (g, σ) ∈ B + × Aut(Γ), we get σV ϕg = ϕσ(g) σV . In particular,
for every g ∈ (B + )Σ , ϕg stabilizes V Σ and hence ϕ induces a linear representation
ϕΣ : (B + )Σ → L (V Σ ), g 7→ ϕΣ
g = ϕg |V Σ .
Proof. The action of Aut(Γ) on Φ+ respects the depth, and this clearly implies that
σV (ϕi (eα )) = ϕσ(i) (eσ(α) ) in view of the formulas of definition 2. The result follows
by linearity and induction on ℓ(g).
Proposition 8. Assume that fi = fσ(i) σV in V ⋆ , for every (i, σ) ∈ I ×Σ. Then for
every (g, σ) ∈ B + × Σ, we get σV ψg = ψσ(g) σV . In particular, for every g ∈ (B + )Σ ,
ψg stabilizes V Σ and hence ψ induces a linear representation
ψ Σ : (B + )Σ → L (V Σ ), g 7→ ψgΣ = ψg |V Σ .
Moreover if the images of ψ are invertible, then so are the images of ψ Σ .
6
ANATOLE CASTELLA
Proof. We have σV ψi = σV ϕi + σV (fi ⊗ eαi ) = σV ϕi + fi ⊗ eασ(i) and ψσ(i) σV =
ϕσ(i) σV + (fσ(i) ⊗ eασ(i) )σV = ϕσ(i) σV + (fσ(i) σV ) ⊗ eασ(i) (thanks to the formulas
of [6, Rem. 1]), whence σV ψi = ψσ(i) σV by the previous lemma and assumption on
fi and fσ(i) . The first point follows by induction on ℓ(g). Moreover if the images
−1
of ψ are invertible, then the equality σV ψg σV−1 = ψσ(g) implies σV ψg−1 σV−1 = ψσ(g)
,
−1
Σ
+ Σ
and hence ψg stabilizes V for every g ∈ (B ) . This gives the result.
Definition 9 (twisted LK-representations). Under the assumption of the previous proposition, we call twisted LK-representation the linear representation ψ Σ :
(B + )Σ → L (V Σ ) of the Artin-Tits monoid (B + )Σ = BΓ+Σ , and, when appropriate,
Σ
the induced representation ψgp
: BΓΣ → GL(V Σ ) of the Artin-Tits group BΓΣ .
The assumption fi = fσ(i) σV for every (i, σ) ∈ I × Σ is equivalent to fi (eα ) =
fσ(i) (eσ(α) ) for every (i, α, σ) ∈ I × Φ+ × Σ. It is not always satisfied : for example
if i and σ(i) are not in the same connected component of Γ, then fi (eαi ) and
fσ(i) (eασ(i) ) can be chosen to be distinct (see [6, Section 3.1]). I do not know if
this assumption is always satisfied when Γ is connected, but we have the following
partial result :
Proposition 10. Let (fi )i∈I be an LK-family. Assume that b, c, d are invertible
in R and that we are in one of the following cases :
(i) Γ is spherical and connected (i.e. of type ADE), or
(ii) Γ is affine (i.e. of type ÃD̃Ẽ), or
(iii) Γ has no triangle and (fi )i∈I is the LK-family of Paris, as in [6, Def. 42].
Then fi = fσ(i) σV for every (i, σ) ∈ I × Aut(Γ).
Proof. The condition fi (eα ) = fσ(i) (eσ(α) ) for every (i, α, σ) ∈ I × Φ+ × Aut(Γ),
for the three situations (note that the first one is a consequence of the third one),
is easy to see by induction on dp(α), using the inductive construction of the fi (eα ),
(i, α) ∈ I × Φ+ , and the independence results at the inductive steps, of [6, Sections
3.2, 3.3 and 3.4] respectively, and using the fact that the action of Aut(Γ) on Φ+
respects the depth.
2.3. Twisted faithfulness criterion.
The aim of this subsection is to prove that the classical faithfulness criterion of
[14], as stated in theorem 6 above, also works in the twisted cases.
For g ∈ B + , we set I(g) = {i ∈ I | si 4 g}.
Lemma 11. Let ψ : (B + )Σ → M be a monoid homomorphism where M is left
cancellative. If ψ satisfies ψ(g) = ψ(g ′ ) ⇒ I(g) = I(g ′ ) for all g, g ′ ∈ (B + )Σ , then
ψ is injective.
Proof. Let g, g ′ ∈ (B + )Σ be such that ψ(g) = ψ(g ′ ). We prove by induction on
ℓ(g) that g = g ′ . If ℓ(g) = 0, i.e. if g = 1, then I(g) = I(g ′ ) = ∅, hence g ′ = 1 and
we are done. If ℓ(g) > 0, fix i ∈ I(g) = I(g ′ ). Since the action of Σ on B + respects
the divisibility and since g is fixed by Σ, the orbit J of i under Σ is included in
I(g) = I(g ′ ), but then J is spherical and there exist g1 , g1′ ∈ B + such that g = ∆J g1
and g ′ = ∆J g1′ . Since the elements g, g ′ and ∆J are fixed by Σ (recall that ∆J
is a generator of (B + )Σ ), so are g1 and g1′ by cancellation in B + . We thus get
ψ(∆J )ψ(g1 ) = ψ(∆J )ψ(g1′ ) in M , whence ψ(g1 ) = ψ(g1′ ) by cancellation in M . We
therefore get g1 = g1′ by induction and finally g = g ′ .
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
7
+
+
Notation 12. We denote
every
Pby Φ /Σ the set of orbits of Φ under Σ and, for
+
Θ ∈ Φ /Σ, we set eΘ = α∈Θ eα . The family (eΘ )Θ∈Φ+ /Σ is a basis of V Σ .
Theorem 13. Assume that fi = fσ(i) σV for every (i, σ) ∈ I × Σ, so that the
twisted LK-representation ψ Σ : (B + )Σ → L (V Σ ) is defined (see proposition 8),
and assume that condition (⋆) holds :
(⋆) R is an integral domain, fi (eαi ) 6= 0 for all i ∈ I, and there exists a totally
ordered integral domain R0 and a ring homomorphism ρ : R → R0 , such
that ρ(t) > 0 for t ∈ {a, b, c, d}, and Im(fi ) ⊆ ker(ρ) for all i ∈ I.
By extension of the scalars from R to its field of fractions K, consider ψ Σ as acting
on the K-vector space VKΣ = K⊗R V Σ , so that ψ Σ has its image included in GL(VKΣ ),
Σ
and hence induces a twisted LK-representation ψgp
: BΓΣ → GL(VKΣ ). Then the
Σ
Σ
twisted LK-representation ψ is faithful, and so is ψgp if ΓΣ is spherical.
Proof. Under condition (⋆), the elements b, c, d and fi (eαi ), i ∈ I, are non-zero in
R, so become units of the field of fractions K of R. By propositions 3 and 8, Im(ψ Σ )
Σ
is then included in GL(VKΣ ) — hence is cancellative — and ψgp
: BΓΣ → GL(VKΣ )
Σ
Σ
is defined. Moreover when Γ is spherical, the faithfulness of ψ implies the one of
Σ
ψgp
by [6, Lem. 6].
In order to prove the theorem, it then suffices to see that ψ Σ satisfies the assumption of lemma 11. So let g, g ′ ∈ (B + )Σ be such that ψgΣ = ψgΣ′ and let us show
that I(g) = I(g ′ ). We need for that some notations of [6, Section 2.2].
If we denote by V0 the free R0 -module with basis (eα )α∈Φ+ , then the morphism
ρ : R → R0 induces a natural monoid homomorphism ρ̃ : L (V ) → L (V0 ), ϕ 7→ ϕ.
By (⋆), the homomorphism ρ̃ sends Im(ψ) into L + (V0 ), the submonoid of L (V0 )
composed of the endomorphisms of V0 whose matrix in the basis (eα )α∈Φ+ has
non-negative coefficients. Now for h ∈ (B + )Σ and β ∈ Φ+ , let us denote by
Rh (β) the support of ψh (eβ ) in the basis (eα )α∈Φ+ , and for Ψ ⊆ Φ+ , let us set
S
Rh (Ψ) = β∈Ψ Rh (β). Since the coefficients of the matrix of ψh in the basis
(eα )α∈Φ+ of V0Pare non-negative, the set Rh (Ψ), when Ψ is finite, is precisely the
support of ψh ( β∈Ψ eβ ) in the basis (eα )α∈Φ+ .
In order to show that I(g) = I(g ′ ), it suffices to prove, in view of [14, Prop. 2]
(see [6, Lem. 20]), that Rg (Φ+ ) = Rg′ (Φ+ ). But since ψg and ψg′ coincide on
V Σ , we get in particular that ψg (eΘ ) = ψg′ (eΘ ),
S and hence Rg (Θ) = Rg′ (Θ)
for every Θ ∈ Φ+ /Σ. And finally since Φ+ = Θ∈Φ+ /Σ Θ, we get Rg (Φ+ ) =
S
S
+
Θ∈Φ+ /Σ Rg′ (Θ) = Rg′ (Φ ), whence the result.
Θ∈Φ+ /Σ Rg (Θ) =
3. Case of an automorphism of order two or three
Let Γ = (mi,j )i,j∈I be a Coxeter matrix of small type and fix Σ = hσi 6 Aut(Γ)
of order two or three.
Recall that the submonoid (B + )Σ of fixed points of B + under Σ is generated by
the elements ∆J , for J running through the spherical orbits of I under Σ.
We fix four parameters (a, b, c, d) ∈ R such that d2 − ad − bc = 0 and consider
an LK-family (fi )i∈I associated with (a, b, c, d) that satisfy fi = fσ(i) σV for every
(i, σ) ∈ I × Σ, so that the associated twisted LK-representation ψ Σ : (B + )Σ →
L (V Σ ) is defined.
8
ANATOLE CASTELLA
Σ
The aim of this section is to compute and study the map ψ∆
for a spherical
J
Σ
Σ
Σ
orbit J of I under Σ. For sake of brevity, we set ψJ := ψ∆J and ϕΣ
J := ϕ∆J for
any spherical orbit J.
Notation 14. Any spherical orbit J of I under Σ is of one of the following types :
(i) type A : J = {i},
(ii) type B : J = {i, j} with mi,j = 2,
(iii) type C : J = {i, j, k} with mi,j = mj,k = mk,i = 2,
(iv) type D : J = {i, j} with mi,j = 3.
Notice that types B and D only occur when Σ is of order two, and type C only
occurs when Σ is of order three. We will make a constant use of these types A to
D in the following.
Notation 15. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ.
• We denote by ΘJ the set {αi | i ∈ J} ; it is an orbit of Φ+ under Σ.
• In case D, {αi + αj } is also an orbit of Φ+ under Σ, that we denote by Θ′J .
Notation 16. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ. Since we are assuming
that fi = fσ(i) σV for every i ∈ I, the linear forms fi , for i ∈ J, coincide on V Σ .
Depending on J, we define the following linear forms on V Σ :
(i) for type A : fJ = fi |V Σ , where J = {i},
(ii) for type B : fJ = dfi |V Σ , for any i ∈ J,
(iii) for type C : fJ = d2 fi |V Σ , for any i ∈ J,
(iv) for type D : fJ = fj (bc Id +aϕi )|V Σ and fJ′ = cfj ϕi |V Σ , where J = {i, j}.
Notice that the two linear forms for case D really only depend on J (not on the
choice of i and j in J) since fi |V Σ = fj |V Σ by assumption and since fj ϕi = fi ϕj
by definition of an LK-family.
Lemma 17. If i, j ∈ I with i 6= j, then fj (bc Id +aϕi ) = fj ϕ2i in V ⋆ . Moreover if
mi,j = 3, then fj ϕ2i = fi ϕj ϕi in V ⋆ .
Proof. By [6, Lem. 11], the endomorphism ϕ2i − aϕi − bc Id has its image included
in Reαi , which is included in ker(fj ) if i 6= j since then fj (eαi ) = 0 by definition of
an LK-family. So fj (ϕ2i − aϕi − bc Id) is the zero form and this gives the first point.
The second point is clear since then fj ϕi = fi ϕj by definition of an LK-family.
Proposition 18. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ. Then
(i) ψJΣ = ϕΣ
J + fJ ⊗ eΘJ if J is of type A, B or C,
′
(ii) ψJΣ = ϕΣ
J + fJ ⊗ eΘJ + fJ ⊗ eΘ′J if J is of type D.
Proof. Recall that for every i ∈ I, ψi is given by ψi = ϕi + fi ⊗ eαi . The result for
type A is trivial, since then ψJΣ = ψi |V Σ . For type B, we have ψJΣ = ψi ψj |V Σ . But
in that case, we also have ϕi (eαj ) = deαj (by definition of ϕi ) and fi (eαj ) = 0 (by
definition of an LK-family), thus we get, thanks to the formulas of [6, Rem. 1],
ψi ψj = ϕi ϕj + fi ϕj ⊗ eαi + dfj ⊗ eαj ,
whence the result since fi ϕj = dfi by definition of an LK-family. Similarly for type
C, we have ψJΣ = ψi ψj ψk |V Σ and since ϕi (eαj ) = deαj , ϕi (eαk ) = ϕj (eαk ) = deαk ,
and fi (eαj ) = fi (eαk ) = fj (eαk ) = 0, we get, thanks to [6, Rem. 1],
ψi ψj ψk = ϕi ϕj ϕk + fi ϕj ϕk ⊗ eαi + dfj ϕk ⊗ eαj + d2 fk ⊗ eαk ,
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
9
whence the result since fi ϕj ϕk = dfi ϕk = d2 fi and fj ϕk = dfj by definition
of an LK-family. Finally for type D, we have ψJΣ = ψi ψj ψi |V Σ and ϕi (eαj ) =
aeαj + ceαi +αj , ϕi ϕj (eαi ) = bceαj , fi (eαj ) = fj (eαi ) = 0, and fi ϕj (eαi ) = 0 (since
fi ϕj = fj ϕi and ϕi (eαi ) = 0), hence we get, thanks to [6, Rem. 1],
ψi ψj ψi = ϕi ϕj ϕi + fi ϕj ϕi ⊗ eαi + [bcfi + afj ϕi ] ⊗ eαj + cfj ϕi ⊗ eαi +αj ,
whence the result by lemma 17 and by the fact that fi |V Σ = fj |V Σ .
Remark 19. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ and let Θ be an orbit of
Φ+ under
T Σ. Recall that we denote by MJ (Θ) the J-mesh of Θ, i.e. the set
WJ (Θ) Φ+ . Notice that this subset of Φ+ is a union of orbits of Φ+ under Σ.
It is clear that all the maps ϕi , for i ∈ J, stabilize the submodule of V generated
by the elements eβ for β running through MJ (Θ). So the map ϕΣ
J stabilizes the
submodule of V Σ generated by the elements eΘ for Θ running through the orbits
Σ
included in MJ (Θ), and hence the matrix of ϕΣ
J in the basis (eΘ )Θ∈Φ+ /Σ of V
+
is block diagonal, relatively to the partition of Φ /Σ induced by those J-meshes
MJ (Θ) for Θ ∈ Φ+ /Σ.
In subsections 3.1 to 3.4 below, we explicit the different possible blocks of ϕΣ
J,
for the four possible types of J and for the different possible J-meshes MJ (Θ) when
Θ runs through Φ+ /Σ. For each such J-mesh X = MJ (Θ), we denote by MX the
corresponding block in ϕΣ
J and by PX its characteristic polynomial.
Notation 20. For sake of brevity in what follows, we set dˇ := a − d in R. In
ˇ and ddˇ = −bc.
particular, the roots of the polynomial X 2 − aX − bc are d and d,
3.1. Type A.
We assume here that J = {i}, and hence that ϕΣ
J = ϕi |V Σ .
• Configuration A1 : Θ = ΘJ . The corresponding block is
MA1 = 0 .
i
• Configuration A2 : Θ s✐
or Θ
The corresponding block is
Θ2
• Configuration A3 :
MA2 = d .
s
Θ2
i
Θ1
s✐
s✐
i
i
or Θ
or
s
Θ1
s
s
i
i
s
s
or
Θ2
Θ1
The corresponding block is
MA3
eΘ1 eΘ2
a b
,
=
c 0
whose characteristic polynomial is
ˇ
PA3 = (X − d)(X − d).
si✐ si✐ si✐.
s
s
i
i
s
i
s
s
s
.
10
ANATOLE CASTELLA
3.2. Type B.
We assume here that J = {i, j} with mi,j = 2, and hence that ϕΣ
J = (ϕi ϕj )|V Σ .
• Configuration B1 : Θ = ΘJ . The corresponding block is
MB1 = 0 .
si✐
j✐
• Configuration B2 : Θ
s✐
s✐
j✐
i j✐
i .
or Θ
MB2
• Configuration B3 :
Θ2
s
j✐
i
s
i✐
j
Θ1
s
j✐
s
i✐
The corresponding block is
= d2 .
. The corresponding block is
MB3
whose characteristic polynomial is
eΘ1 eΘ2
ad bd
,
=
cd 0
ˇ
PB3 = (X − d2 )(X − dd).
Θ3
i
• Configuration B4 :
Θ2
Θ1
s
❅j
❅s
s
❅
j
❅s
MB4
whose characteristic polynomial is
. The corresponding block is
i
3
eΘ2 1 eΘ2 e2Θ
a 2ab b
= ac bc 0 ,
c2
0
0
ˇ
PB4 = (X − d2 )(X − dd)(X
− dˇ2 ).
Θ4
s
s
❅ j ❅i
s ❅s ❅s Θ3
s
. The corresponding block is
❅i
❅
j
j
❅s ❅s
i
• Configuration B5 :
Θ2
Θ1
MB5
eΘ21
a
ac
=
ac
c2
whose characteristic polynomial is
eΘ2
eΘ3 eΘ4
2
ab ab
0 bc
bc 0
0 0
b
0
,
0
0
ˇ 2 (X − dˇ2 ).
PB5 = (X − d2 )(X − dd)
Moreover, it is easily checked that the polynomial PB4 already annihilates MB5 .
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
11
3.3. Type C.
We assume here that J = {i, j, k} with mi,j = mj,k = mk,i = 2, and hence that
ϕΣ
J = (ϕi ϕj ϕk )|V Σ .
• Configuration C1 : Θ = ΘJ . The corresponding block is
MC1 = 0 .
k✐
s
j✐i✐ or
• Configuration C2 : Θ
k✐
k✐
k✐
s
s
s
j✐i✐ j✐i✐ j✐i✐.
Θ
The corresponding block is
MC2 = d3 .
• Configuration C3 :
Θ2
sk✐ i✐
sk✐ j✐si✐
j✐
Θ1
sk✐ i✐
sk✐ j✐si✐
j✐
i
j
MC3
k
. The corresponding block is
eΘ21 eΘ22
ad bd
=
,
cd2
0
whose characteristic polynomial is
ˇ
PC3 = (X − d3 )(X − d2 d).
Θ4
• Configuration C4 :
Θ2
Θ1
k✐ i✐ j✐
s
s
s
✑◗✑j ◗ k
✑
j✑ ◗
k
i
✑◗✑◗ ◗
✑
s i✐✑
s ✐s✑◗s ✐◗s ✐◗s ✐
k✐
◗ ◗ j j◗✑k k ✑ i ✑ j. Θ3
i◗ ◗✑◗✑ ✑
i
◗✑
s ◗s✑◗s✑
k✐ i✐ j✐
The corresponding block is
MC4
eΘ4
eΘ3
eΘ1 eΘ2
a2 d abd abd b2 d
acd
0
bcd 0
,
=
acd bcd
0
0
c2 d
0
0
0
whose characteristic polynomial is
ˇ 2 (X − ddˇ2 ).
PC4 = (X − d3 )(X − d2 d)
ˇ
−ddˇ2 ) already
Moreover, one can check that the polynomial (X −d3 )(X −d2 d)(X
annihilates MC4 .
s
Θ4
Θ3
• Configuration C5 :
Θ2
Θ1
k j❅i
s
s ❅s
k
i
j❅ ❅
j
i
s ❅s k❅s
❅
i j
❅s
k
12
ANATOLE CASTELLA
The corresponding block is
MC5
eΘ1
a3
a2 c
=
ac2
c3
eΘ2
3a2 b
2abc
bc2
0
eΘ3
3ab2
b2 c
0
0
whose characteristic polynomial is
eΘ4
3
b
0
,
0
0
ˇ
− ddˇ2 )(X − dˇ3 ).
PC5 = (X − d3 )(X − d2 d)(X
s ✏P
s ✏sP
✏P
PP
✏✏
✏P
✏P
✏✏
✏P
PP
PPPP
✏
✏
P
✏
✏
✏
s
s
s ✏P
s ✏P
s ✏sP✏
Ps P
✏
✏
✏
P
P
✏s✏P
✏s
PP
P
P
P
P
P✏
✏
✏
✏
✏
P✏
P✏
P✏
P✏
P✏
P✏
P
P
P
P
P
P
✏
✏
✏
✏
✏
✏
P
P
P
P✏
sP✏✏
s ✏✏
s ✏
s ✏
s ✏
P✏
P✏
Ps✏
PsP✏
PsPPs
✏
P
✏
PP
PP
✏✏
✏✏✏✏
PP
P
✏
PPPP✏
P✏
✏ ✏
P
s P✏
s ✏
P✏
Ps✏✏
Θ8
Θ5
• Configuration C6 :
Θ2
Θ1
Θ6 , Θ7
Θ3 , Θ4
(the labels i, j, k on the edges are omitted).
The corresponding block is
MC6
eΘ3
2
eΘ2
2
eΘ31
a
a2 c
2
a c
2
a c
=
ac2
2
ac
2
ac
c3
a b
0
abc
abc
0
0
bc2
0
a b
abc
0
abc
0
bc2
0
0
eΘ4
2
a b
abc
abc
0
bc2
0
0
0
eΘ5
2
ab
0
0
b2 c
0
0
0
0
eΘ6
2
ab
0
b2 c
0
0
0
0
0
eΘ7
2
ab
b2 c
0
0
0
0
0
0
whose characteristic polynomial is
eΘ8
3
b
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
ˇ 3 (X − ddˇ2 )3 (X − dˇ3 ).
PC6 = (X − d3 )(X − d2 d)
And one can check that the polynomial PC5 already annihilates MC6 .
3.4. Type D.
We assume here that J = {i, j} with mi,j = 3, and hence that ϕΣ
J = (ϕi ϕj ϕi )|V Σ .
• Configuration D1 : ΘJ and Θ′J . The corresponding block is
0 0
MD1 =
.
0 0
• Configuration D2 : Θ
si✐
j✐
or Θ
s✐
si✐.
j✐
i j✐
MD2
Θ3
• Configuration D3 : Θ2
Θ1
s j✐
s
i✐
j
i
s
The corresponding block is
= d3 .
s . The corresponding block is
i
j
s
j✐
s
i✐
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
13
eΘ21 eΘ2 eΘ23
ad abd b d
= acd bcd 0 ,
c2 d
0
0
MD3
whose characteristic polynomial is
ˇ 3 ).
PD3 = (X − d3 )(X 2 + (dd)
Θ4
j
s
Θ3
• Configuration D4 : Θ
2
s
❅i
❅s
i
j
s
s . The corresponding block is
❅
j
❅s i
Θ1
eΘ4
eΘ3
eΘ2
2eΘ1
a(a + bc) 2a2 b 2ab2 b3
a2 c
2abc b2 c 0
,
MD4 =
2
ac
bc2
0
0
c3
0
0
0
whose characteristic polynomial is
ˇ 3 )(X − dˇ3 ).
PD4 = (X − d3 )(X 2 + (dd)
Θ6
i
s
Θ4
• Configuration D5 : Θ2
Θ1
MD5
s
s
❅j❅i
s ❅s ❅s Θ5
j
i
j
i
s
s
s
❅j
❅
i
❅s ❅s
s Θ3 . The corresponding block is
i
eΘ2
eΘ1
eΘ3
a(a2 + bc) a2 b a2 b
a2 c
abc abc
a2 c
abc
abc
=
ac2
0 bc2
ac2
bc2
0
3
c
0
0
eΘ4
ab2
0
b2 c
0
0
0
eΘ5
ab2
b2 c
0
0
0
0
eΘ6
3
whose characteristic polynomial is
b
0
0
,
0
0
0
ˇ 3 )2 (X − dˇ3 ).
PD5 = (X − d3 )(X 2 + (dd)
Moreover, it is easily checked that the polynomial PD4 already annihilates MD5 .
3.5. Consequences on annihilating polynomials.
Lemma 21. Let ϕ ∈ L (V ), f, f ′ ∈ V ⋆ and e, e′ ∈ V be such that ϕ(e) = ϕ(e′ ) = 0
and f (e′ ) = f ′ (e) = 0. We set fe = f (e) and fe′ ′ = f ′ (e′ ). Then we get the following
identities in L (V ), for all n ∈ N :
"n−1
#
X
(i) (ϕ + f ⊗ e)n = ϕn + f
fek ϕn−1−k ⊗ e,
k=0
14
ANATOLE CASTELLA
′
′ n
n
(ii) (ϕ+f ⊗e+f ⊗e ) = ϕ +f
"n−1
X
k=0
fek ϕn−1−k
#
⊗e+f
′
"n−1
X
Proof. By induction on n, using the identities of [6, Rem. 1].
k=0
fe′k′ ϕn−1−k
#
⊗e′ .
Lemma 22. Let J = {i, j} be an orbit of I under Σ, with mi,j = 3. Then
fJ (eΘ′J ) = fJ′ (eΘJ ) = 0 and fJ (eΘJ ) = fJ′ (eΘ′J ).
Proof. With the formulas of notation 16 and lemma 17, we get for the first point :
fJ (eΘ′J ) = fi ϕj ϕi (eαi +αj ) = fi ϕj (beαj ) = 0, and
fJ′ (eΘJ ) = cfi ϕj (eαi + eαj ) = cfj ϕi (eαi ) + cfi ϕj (eαj ) = 0,
and for the second point :
fJ (eΘJ ) = fi ϕj ϕi (eαi + eαj ) = fi ϕj ϕi (eαj ) = fi (bceαi ) = bcfi (eαi ), and
fJ′ (eΘ′J ) = cfi ϕj (eαi +αj ) = cfi (beαi ) = bcfi (eαi ).
Proposition 23. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ, and consider P ∈ R[X].
Then there exists a polynomial Q ∈ R[X] (that depends on J and P ) such that :
Σ
(i) P (ψJΣ ) = P (ϕΣ
J ) + fJ Q(ϕJ ) ⊗ eΘJ if J is of type A, B or C,
′
Σ
Σ
Σ
(ii) P (ψJ ) = P (ϕJ ) + fJ Q(ϕΣ
J ) ⊗ eΘJ + fJ Q(ϕJ ) ⊗ eΘ′J if J is of type D.
Proof. For types A, B and C, the result follows from proposition 18 and lemma
21 (i), which applies since ϕΣ
J (eΘJ ) = 0 (cf. configurations A1, B1 and C1). For
type D, lemma 21 (ii) applies to the decomposition of ψJΣ given in proposition 18
Σ
(ii) since ϕΣ
J (eΘJ ) = ϕJ (eΘ′J ) = 0 (cf. configuration D1), and since fJ (eΘ′J ) =
′
fJ (eΘJ ) = 0 by the previous lemma. Hence we get two polynomials Q and Q′ such
′ ′
Σ
Σ
that P (ψJΣ ) = P (ϕΣ
J ) + fJ Q(ϕJ ) ⊗ eΘJ + fJ Q (ϕJ ) ⊗ eΘ′J . But the two polynomials
Q and Q′ thus obtained are in fact equal since, again by the previous lemma,
fJ (eΘJ ) = fJ′ (eΘ′J ).
Pd
n
Remark 24. More precisely, if P =
in proposition 23, then Q =
n=0 pn X
Pd−1
n
q
X
with
q
=
p
and
q
=
p
+
q
f
(e
d−1
d
n−1
n
n J ΘJ ) for every 1 6 n 6 d − 1.
n=0 n
Notation 25. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ. Depending on J, we define
a polynomial PJ ∈ R[X] by :
ˇ if J is of type A,
(i) PJ = (X − d)(X − d)
2
ˇ
(ii) PJ = (X − d )(X − dd)(X
− dˇ2 ) if J is of type B,
3
2ˇ
(iii) PJ = (X − d )(X − d d)(X − ddˇ2 )(X − dˇ3 ) if J is of type C,
ˇ 3 )(X − dˇ3 ) if J is of type D.
(iv) PJ = (X − d3 )(X 2 + (dd)
Lemma 26. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ. Then
′
(i) PJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘ ) = 0 when Θ 6= ΘJ (resp. when Θ 6= ΘJ and Θ 6= ΘJ ) if J is
of type A, B or C (resp. D),
′
(ii) PJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘ ) = PJ (0)eΘ when Θ = ΘJ (resp. when Θ = ΘJ or Θ = ΘJ ) if
J is of type A, B or C (resp. D).
Proof. In view of the results of subsections 3.1 to 3.4 above, the polynomial PJ
Σ
annihilates the non-zero blocks of ϕΣ
J , hence we get that PJ (ϕJ )(eΘ ) = 0 if Θ 6=
′
ΘJ (resp. if Θ 6= ΘJ and Θ 6= ΘJ ) for types A, B and C (resp. D). Moreover
Σ
since ϕΣ
J (eΘJ ) = 0 for all cases, and since ϕJ (eΘ′J ) = 0 for type D, we get that
Σ
PJ (ϕJ )(eΘJ ) = PJ (0)eΘJ for all cases, and that PJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘ′J ) = PJ (0)eΘ′J for
type D.
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
15
Proposition 27. Let J be a spherical orbit of I under Σ. The image of PJ (ψJΣ ) is
included in ReΘJ (resp. in ReΘJ ⊕ ReΘ′J ) if J is of type A, B or C (resp. D). As
a consequence, the polynomial (X − fJ (eΘJ ))PJ annihilates ψJΣ .
Proof. The previous lemma shows that the image of PJ (ϕΣ
J ) is included in ReΘJ
(resp. in ReΘJ ⊕ ReΘ′J ) for types A, B and C (resp. D). But by proposition 23,
Σ
PJ (ψJΣ ) is the sum of PJ (ϕΣ
whose image is
J ) and of some endomorphism of V
included in ReΘJ (resp. in ReΘJ ⊕ ReΘ′J ) for types A, B and C (resp. D), whence
the first point of the proposition.
The second point for types A, B and C (resp. D) follows from proposition 18
(i) (resp. proposition 18 (ii) and lemma 22), and the studies of configurations A1,
B1, and C1 (resp. D1), which show that eΘJ (resp. each of eΘJ and eΘ′J ) is an
eigenvector of ψJΣ for the eigenvalue fJ (eΘJ ).
Remark 28. Let us denote by f the common value of the fi (eαi ) for i ∈ J (recall
that we are assuming that fi = fσ(i) σV for all i ∈ I). Then it is easily checked on
the definitions that the value of fJ (eΘJ ) is f (resp. df , resp. d2 f , resp. bcf ) if J is
of type A (resp. B, resp. C, resp. D).
4. The spherical case
We assume here that Γ is of spherical type An (n > 2), Dn (n > 4) or E6 .
In all the cases but D4 , we fix Σ = Aut(Γ) (of order two), and when Γ is of
type D4 , we take for Σ a subgroup of Aut(Γ) (which is of order six) of order two or
three. The Coxeter matrix ΓΣ = (mΣ
J,K )J,K∈I Σ — which encodes the presentations
of the Coxeter group W Σ , the Artin-Tits monoid (B + )Σ and the Artin-Tits group
B Σ — is then of type Bn if Γ = A2n−1 , A2n or Dn+1 with |Σ| = 2, of type F4 if
Γ = E6 , or of type G2 if Γ = D4 with |Σ| = 3 (see for example [9, 5]).
We fix an integral domain R and (a, b, c, d) ∈ R4 such that d2 − ad − bc = 0. Let
(fi )i∈I ∈ (V ⋆ )I be an LK-family relatively to (a, b, c, d) and consider the associated
LK-representation ψ : B + → L (V ) of B + .
We will always assume in this section that the elements b, c and d are non-zero
in R, so that they become invertible in the field of fractions K of R. By extension
of the scalars from R to K, we will consider ψ as acting on the K-vector space
VK = V ⊗R K. It then follows from proposition 10 that ψ induces a twisted LKrepresentation ψ Σ : (B + )Σ → L (VKΣ ) of (B + )Σ over VKΣ = K ⊗R V Σ .
By [6, Section 3.2], the LK-family (fi )i∈I , seen as an element of (VK⋆ )I , is entirely determined by the common value f of the elements fi (eαi ), i ∈ I. Moreover when f 6= 0, then ψ has its image included in GL(VK ) and hence induces an
LK-representation ψgp : B → GL(VK ) of the Artin-Tits group B, and a twisted
Σ
LK-representation ψgp
: B Σ → GL(VKΣ ) of the Artin-Tits group B Σ .
In view of the results of the previous section, in order to really understand the
Σ
maps ψJΣ = ψ∆
, J ∈ I Σ , we need to list the possible configurations of the J-meshes
J
+
MJ (Θ) in Φ , when Θ runs through Φ+ /Σ. This is done in the following lemma.
Lemma 29. Fix an orbit J of I under Σ. We list, in the following tables, the
number NX of occurrences of configuration X (with the notations of subsections
3.1 to 3.4) among the J-meshes MJ (Θ) in Φ+ , when Θ runs through Φ+ /Σ. (The
configurations that do not occur are omitted).
16
ANATOLE CASTELLA
• If Γ = A2n−1 , or Dn with |Σ| = 2, or E6 , then J can be of type A or B
and we get :
A2n−1
Dn (|Σ| = 2)
E6
NA1
1
1
1
if J is of type A
NA2
NA3
(n − 1)2
n−1
n2 −6n+10 2n−5
9
7
NB1
1
1
1
if J is of type B
NB2
NB3
NB4
(n − 2)2
2n − 4
1
(n−2)(n−3)
0
n−2
6
4
3
• If Γ = A2n , then J can be of type B (if n > 2) or D and we get :
NB1
1
if J is of type B
NB2
NB3
(n − 1)(n − 2) 2n − 3
NB4
1
if J is of type D
ND1
ND2
ND3
1
(n − 1)2 n − 1
• If Γ = D4 with |Σ| = 3, then J can be of type A or C and we get :
if J is of type A
NA1 NA2 NA3
1
1
2
Proof. Left to the reader.
if J is of type C
NC1 NC2 NC5
1
1
1
4.1. Irreducibility.
In this subsection, we exclude the case Γ = A2n , so that there is no orbit of type
D in I, and hence no configurations D1 to D5 in Φ+ .
Lemma 30. For all Θ ∈ Φ+ /Σ with dp(Θ) > 2, there exists J ∈ I Σ such that
dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ).
Proof. Fix α ∈ Θ and i ∈ I such that dp(si (α)) < dp(α), and let us denote by J
the orbit of i under Σ. Necessarily, the J-mesh MJ (Θ) is in configuration A3, B3,
B4 or C5, and Θ is not of minimal depth in MJ (Θ).
In case of a configuration A3, B3, B4 with Θ of maximal depth in MJ (Θ), or C5
with Θ of maximal or second-maximal depth in MJ (Θ), then dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ)
and we are done. In the other cases, then (dp(rJ (Θ)) > dp(Θ) and) a look at the
graph of Φ+ in the different possible situations reveals that there exists i′ ∈ I with
dp(si′ (α)) < dp(α) for which, if we denote by J ′ its orbit under Σ, then MJ ′ (Θ) is
in configuration A3 or B3, so here again we are done, up to changing J for J ′ .
In the following proposition, we prove the first part of our irreducibility criterion.
Notation 31. If J if an orbit of I under Σ, we consider the polynomial PJ as in
notation 25. In view of proposition 23, there exist a polynomial QJ ∈ R[X] such
Σ
that PJ (ψJΣ ) = PJ (ϕΣ
J ) + fJ QJ (ϕJ ) ⊗ eΘJ .
+
By lemma 26, we get PJ (ψJΣ )(eΘ ) = fJ QJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘ )eΘJ for every Θ ∈ Φ /Σ with
)
=
0
for
J,
K
∈
I Σ with
)(e
Θ 6= ΘJ . Moreover it can be checked that fJ QJ (ϕΣ
ΘK
J
=
2.
mΣ
J,K
Σ
with
Proposition 32. Assume that fJ QJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘK ) 6= 0 for every J, K ∈ I
Σ
Σ
Σ
Σ
mJ,K > 3. If U is an invariant subspace of VK under ψ such that PK (ψK )(U ) 6=
{0} for some K ∈ I Σ , then U = VKΣ .
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
17
T
Proof. By proposition 27 and since U is invariant, we get PJ (ψJΣ )(U ) ⊆ U ReΘJ
Σ
)(U ) 6= {0}. Now if J ∈ I Σ is distinct
for all J ∈ I Σ , whence eΘK ∈ U since PK (ψK
Σ
from K, we get that PJ (ψJ )(eΘK ) = fJ QJ (ψJΣ )(eΘK )eΘJ belongs to U , whence
Σ
eΘJ ∈ U if mΣ
J,K > 3 since then, by assumption, fJ QJ (ϕJ )(eΘK ) 6= 0. We thus get
that eΘJ ∈ U for all J ∈ I Σ by connectivity of ΓΣ .
Now consider Θ ∈ Φ+ /Σ, of depth p > 2, such that every eΘ′ belongs to U whenever dp(Θ′ ) < p. By lemma 30, there exists J ∈ I Σ such that dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ),
so in particular erJ (Θ) ∈ U . Necessarily, the J-mesh MJ (Θ) is in configuration
A3, B3, B4 with Θ of maximal depth in MJ (Θ), or C5 with Θ of maximal or
second-maximal depth in MJ (Θ), and hence ψJΣ (erJ (Θ) ) is a linear combination of
eΘ , erJ (Θ) , eΘJ and possibly some other eΘ′ for Θ′ ⊆ MJ (Θ) with dp(Θ′ ) < p, in
which the coefficient of eΘ is c, cd, c2 , c3 or bc2 respectively.
Since U is invariant by ψJΣ and since bcd 6= 0 by assumption, we thus get, in all
the cases, the element eΘ as a linear combination of elements of U , hence eΘ ∈ U
and we conclude by induction that U = VKΣ .
The following lemma explicits the condition on fJ QJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘK ) of the previous
proposition (recall that f is the common value of the fi (eαi ) for i ∈ I, and that we
set dˇ = a − d) :
Lemma 33. Consider two orbits J, K ∈ I Σ with mΣ
J,K > 3. Then the coefficient
Σ
fJ QJ (ϕJ )(eΘK ) is equal to :
(i) −|K|af if J is of type A,
(ii) ad2 f (dˇ2 − df ) if J is of type B,
(iii) ad5 f (−d3 f 2 + addˇ2 f − dˇ5 ) if J is of type C.
Proof. First notice that the assumption mΣ
J,K > 3 implies that mj,k = 3 for some
(j, k) ∈ J × K (see [9, Section 3] or [5, Section 4.2]). Now it is easy to see that if
J is of type A (resp. B, resp. C), then ΘK necessarily appears at the bottom of a
configuration A3 (resp. B3 or B4, resp. C5). The result then follows from direct
computations, using the expression of QJ deduced from remark 24 and notation
25, and the expressions of the encountered fJ (eΘ ) as multiples of f deduced from
[6, Table 1].
Now we turn to the second part of the irreducibility criterion.
Proposition 34. Assume that there exists a prime ideal Q of R with bcd 6∈ Q and
Im(fi ) ⊆ Q for all i ∈ I. If U is an invariant subspace of VKΣ under ψ Σ such that
PJ (ψJΣ )(U ) = {0} for all J ∈ I Σ , then U = {0}.
Proof. Recall that the image of PJ (ψJΣ ) is included in KeΘJ . Since U is invariant,
we get PJ (ψJΣ )ψgΣ (U ) = {0} for every (J, g) ∈ I Σ × (B + )Σ , and hence, if we denote
by L(J,g),Θ the element of R such that PJ (ψJΣ )ψgΣ (eΘ ) = L(J,g),Θ eΘJ , and by L the
matrix (L(J,g),Θ )(J,g)∈I Σ ×(B + )Σ ,Θ∈Φ+ /Σ , we get that U is included in ker(L).
Now we claim that under the assumptions of the proposition, the matrix L is
non-singular, which thus implies that U = {0}. To prove our claim, it suffices to
construct some pairs (JΘ , gΘ ) ∈ I Σ ×(B + )Σ for Θ running through Φ+ /Σ, such that
the square submatrix L′ = (L(JΘ ,gΘ ),Ω )Θ,Ω∈Φ+ /Σ of L is invertible. We construct
the pairs (JΘ , gΘ ) ∈ I Σ × (B + )Σ by induction on dp(Θ) as follows.
18
ANATOLE CASTELLA
If dp(Θ) = 1, i.e. if Θ = ΘJ for some J ∈ I Σ , we set JΘ = J and gΘ = 1. Now
by induction if dp(Θ) > 2, then we fix some J ∈ I Σ such that dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ)
(which exists by lemma 30) and we set JΘ = JrJ (Θ) and gΘ = grJ (Θ) ∆J .
We are going to see that
k l m
Σ
(i) PJΘ (ϕΣ
JΘ )ϕgΘ (eΘ ) = ±b c d eΘJΘ for some k, l, m ∈ N,
Σ
Σ
(ii) PJΘ (ϕJΘ )ϕgΘ (eΩ ) = 0 for Ω ∈ Φ+ /Σ with dp(Ω) > dp(Θ) and Ω 6= Θ.
Σ
Since PJ (ψJΣ )ψgΣ (eΘ ) ≡ PJ (ϕΣ
J )ϕg (eΘ ) mod Q, points (i) and (ii) will show that
′
the matrix L is lower triangular modulo Q — if we choose an order on Φ+ /Σ that
is consistent with depth — with non-zero diagonal coefficients modulo Q, since
bcd 6∈ Q. Hence this will show that the determinant of L′ is non-zero modulo Q
(recall that Q is prime), and therefore is non-zero in R, whence the result.
So it remains to prove (i) and (ii).
Let us prove (i). If Θ = ΘJ for some J ∈ I Σ , then by lemma 26 we get
3
6
PJ (ϕΣ
J )(eΘJ ) = PJ (0)eΘJ , with PJ (0) = −bc (resp. (bc) , resp. (bc) ) if J is of
type A (resp. B, resp. C), whence the result when dp(Θ) = 1. Now assume that
dp(Θ) > 2 and consider the fixed J ∈ I Σ such that dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ).
If MJ (Θ) is in configuration A3, B3, B4 or C5, with Θ of maximal depth in
2
3
MJ (Θ), then ϕΣ
J (eΘ ) = λerJ (Θ) with λ = b, bd, b or b respectively, whence the
result by induction. The only other possible configuration is C5 with Θ of second
maximal depth in MJ (Θ), which occurs when Γ = D4 with |Σ| = 3. If we label
the vertices of D4 as in [2, Planche IV], we thus get I Σ = {J, K} with J = {1, 3, 4}
and K = {2}, Θ = {α1 + α2 + α3 , α1 + α2 + α4 , α2 + α3 + α4 }, gΘ = ∆K ∆J , and
Σ
9 7
Σ
3
JΘ = J, whence ϕΣ
gΘ (eΘ ) = b ceΘJ and PJΘ (ϕJΘ )ϕgΘ (eΘ ) = b c eΘJΘ .
Let us prove (ii). By lemma 26, it suffices to see that ϕΣ
gΘ (eΩ ) is a linear combi′
′
nation of some eΘ with Θ 6= ΘJΘ . This is clear if Θ = ΘJ since then gΘ = 1. So
assume that dp(Θ) > 2 and consider the fixed J ∈ I Σ such that dp(rJ (Θ)) < dp(Θ).
In view of the results of section 3, ϕΣ
J (eΩ ) is a linear combination of some elements
eΩ′ where Ω′ is an orbit included in MJ (Ω), which hence satisfies dp(Ω′ ) > dp(Ω)−p,
where p = 1, 2 or 3 when J is of type A, B or C respectively.
If dp(Ω′ ) > dp(rJ (Θ)) and Ω′ 6= rJ (Θ) for every orbit Ω′ ⊆ MJ (Ω), we get by
′
induction that ϕΣ
grJ (Θ) (eΩ′ ) is a linear combination of elements eΘ′ with Θ distinct
from ΘJrJ (Θ) = ΘJΘ , whence the result. The only obstructions to this situation are
the two following configurations :
• MJ (Θ) in configuration B3, MJ (Ω) in configuration B4, and dp(Θ) =
dp(Ω) maximal in MJ (Θ) and in MJ (Ω).
• MJ (Θ) = MJ (Ω) in configuration C5, Ω of maximal depth, and Θ of
second maximal depth, in MJ (Θ).
The second point occurs if Γ = D4 with Ω = {α1 + α2 + α3 + α4 } and Θ, J and K
3 Σ
as in the proof of (i) above (hence gΘ = ∆K ∆J ), whence ϕΣ
gΘ (eΩ ) = b ϕK (eΘK ) = 0
and the result in that case.
The first point occurs once if Γ = E6 , for J = {3, 5}, Ω = {α2 + α3 + α4 + α5 }
and Θ = {α1 + α3 + α4 + α5 , α3 + α4 + α5 + α6 } with the notations of [2, Planche V].
But the possibilities for (JΘ , gΘ ) are then ({1, 6}, ∆J ∆{2} ∆J ), (J, ∆{1,6} ∆{2} ∆J )
3 2
or (J, ∆{2} ∆{1,6} ∆J ), whence ϕΣ
gΘ (eΩ ) = b d e{α2 } and the result in that case.
The first point also occurs if Γ = A2n−1 (n > 4), for J = {n − j, n + j},
Pn+3j
Pn−j
Pn+j
Ω = { i=n−j αi } and Θ = { i=n−3j αi , i=n+j αi } where 1 6 j 6 n−1
3 , with the
notations of [2, Planche I]. But in that case we necessarily get gΘ = grK rJ (Θ) ∆K ∆J
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
19
where K = {n − k, n + k} for some j + 1 6 k 6 3j. Hence the K-mesh MK (rJ (Ω))
Σ
2
is in configuration B2 and we get ϕΣ
K ϕJ (eΩ ) = (bd) erJ (Ω) , with dp(rJ (Ω)) =
dp(Θ) − 2 = dp(rK rJ (Θ)) and rJ (Ω) 6= rK rJ (Θ), whence the result in those cases
by induction on rK rJ (Θ).
Since there is no configuration B3 in Φ+ for Γ = Dn , the proof is completed.
Theorem 35. Assume that condition (⋆) holds :
(⋆) R is an integral domain, fi (eαi ) 6= 0 for all i ∈ I, and there exists a totally
ordered integral domain R0 and a ring homomorphism ρ : R → R0 , such
that ρ(t) > 0 for t ∈ {a, b, c, d}, and Im(fi ) ⊆ ker(ρ) for all i ∈ I.
Σ
Then the LK-representations ψ Σ and ψgp
are irreducible over VKΣ .
Proof. The result follows from propositions 32 and 34 : the second one applies with
Q = ker(ρ), and the first one applies since under condition (⋆), we get a, d and
ˇ < 0 (since ρ(dd)
ˇ = ρ(−bc) < 0), so
f = fi (eαi ) non-zero in R, f ∈ ker(ρ) and ρ(d)
Σ
Σ
lemma 33 shows that the coefficients fJ QJ (ϕJ )(eΘK ), for mJ,K > 3, are non-zero
in R (look at the image of the parenthesized expressions by ρ).
Remark 36. This result extends to all the spherical and connected cases but A2n
what was done for Γ = E6 in [18, Section 6.1], by a totally different method.
The question for Γ = A2n (n > 2) is still open, as far as I know. The strategy
used here does not directly apply because of the orbit J of type D in Γ : first,
lemma 33 above is not true in this case (look at the orbit Θ′J ), and second, the
image of PJ (ψJΣ ) is not of dimension one, but two (at least when f 6= 0).
The case Γ = A2 is trivial however, since then I Σ = {I}, VKΣ = KeΘI ⊕ KeΘ′I ,
and ψIΣ is the homothety of ratio bcf , hence in this case, ψ Σ is not irreducible.
4.2. Non-equivalence.
In corollary 39 and theorem 41 below, we study the case of two twisted LKrepresentations ψ Σ and ψ ′Σ of BΓ+Σ ≈ (BΓ+ )Σ induced by two LK-representations ψ
and ψ ′ of BΓ+ for a fixed Coxeter matrix Γ.
On the contrary in proposition 42 below, we focus on the particular case of the
Coxeter type Bn , n > 3, and study the case of three twisted LK-representations
′
′′
+
ψ Σ , ψ ′Σ and ψ ′′Σ of BB
induced by three LK-representations ψ, ψ ′ and ψ ′′ of
n
+
+
+
BΓ , BΓ′ and BΓ′′ respectively, where Γ = A2n−1 , Γ′ = Dn+1 and Γ′′ = A2n .
But let us begin with a result on the diagonalizability of the maps ψJΣ .
Proposition 37. Let J be an orbit of I under Σ. We set dˇ = a − d.
(i) If J is of type A and if d, dˇ and f are pairwise distinct, then ψJΣ is diagonalizable over K, with eigenvalues d, dˇ and f of multiplicity NA2 + NA3 ,
NA3 and NA1 respectively.
ˇ dˇ2 and df are pairwise distinct, then ψ Σ
(ii) If J is of type B and if d2 , dd,
J
ˇ dˇ2 and df of multiplicity
is diagonalizable over K, with eigenvalues d2 , dd,
NB2 + NB3 + NB4 , NB3 + NB4 , NB4 and NB1 respectively.
Proof. Let us prove (i). In view of proposition 27, the map ψJΣ is diagonalizable
ˇ But we more precisely claim
over K and its eigenvalues can be fJ (eΘJ ) = f , d or d.
that for any J-mesh M in configuration A1 (resp. A2, resp. A3), some suitable
linear combinations of eΘJ and eΘ , Θ ⊆ M , are eigenvectors of ψJΣ for the value f
ˇ whence the result.
(resp. d, resp. d and d),
20
ANATOLE CASTELLA
The claim is obvious for A1 since eΘJ is clearly an eigenvector of ψJΣ for the value
f . For configuration A2, the linear combination eΘ + λeΘJ is suitable if λ satisfies
fJ (eΘ ) + λf = dλ, and such a λ exists in K since f 6= d by assumption. Now since
ˇ the block of ϕΣ for a J-mesh M in configuration A3 is certainly similar
d 6= d,
J
ˇ i.e. there certainly exists a linear combination
to the diagonal matrix Diag(d, d),
ẽ of eΘ and erJ (Θ) , where M = Θ ∪ rJ (Θ), that is an eigenvector of ϕΣ
J for the
ˇ
eigenvalue d (resp. d). The linear combination ẽ + λeΘJ is then an eigenvector of
ˇ whenever fJ (ẽ) + λf = dλ (resp. dλ),
ˇ and such a
ψJΣ for the eigenvalue d (resp. d)
ˇ
λ exists in K since f 6= d (resp. f 6= d) by assumption.
The proof of (ii) is similar (recall that there is no configuration B5 in Φ+ ).
Remark 38. One can prove an analogue of the previous results for the orbit J of
type C in Γ = D4 (when |Σ| = 3), but we will not need it in what follows. The
ˇ ddˇ2 ,
eigenvalues in this case would be d3 (of multiplicity NC2 + NC5 = 2), and d2 d,
3
2
ˇ
d and d f (of multiplicity NC5 = NC1 = 1).
There is also an analogue for the orbit J of type D in Γ = A2n , if we assume
ˇ 3 of PJ splits in K[X].
that −ddˇ = bc is a square in K, so that the factor X 2 + (dd)
Now let us fix another LK-representation ψ ′ : B + → L (V ) associated with a
quadruple (a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ ) ∈ R4 (such that d′2 − a′ d′ − b′ c′ = 0) and an LK-family
(fi′ )i∈I relatively to (a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ ). We assume that b′ , c′ and d′ are non-zero in R.
As in the preamble of the current section, the LK-family (fi′ )i∈I , seen as an
element of (VK⋆ )I , is entirely determined by the common value f ′ of the fi′ (eαi )
for i ∈ I, and the LK-representation ψ ′ induces a twisted LK-representation ψ ′Σ :
(B + )Σ → L (VKΣ ) of (B + )Σ .
Corollary 39. We set dˇ = a − d and ď′ = a′ − d′ .
(i) Assume that Γ 6= A2n , A3 and that d, dˇ and f (resp. d′ , ď′ and f ′ ) are
pairwise distinct. Then for any orbit J ∈ I Σ of type A, the maps ψJΣ and
ˇ f ) = (d′ , ď′ , f ′ ).
ψJ′Σ are similar over K if and only if (d, d,
ˇ dˇ2 and df (resp. d′2 , d′ ď′ ,
(ii) Assume that Γ = A2n , n > 3, and that d2 , dd,
ď′ 2 and d′ f ′ ) are pairwise distinct. Then for any orbit J of type B, the
ˇ f ) = ±(d′ , ď′ , f ′ ).
maps ψJΣ and ψJ′Σ are similar over K if and only if (d, d,
ˇ f ) 6= (d′ , ď′ , f ′ ) (resp. if Γ = A2n , n > 3,
In particular, if Γ 6= A2n , A3 and (d, d,
′ ′
′
ˇ
and (d, d, f ) 6= ±(d , ď , f )), then the twisted LK-representations ψ Σ and ψ ′Σ are
not equivalent over K.
Proof. Of course if ψ Σ and ψ ′Σ are equivalent, then the maps ψJΣ and ψJ′Σ are similar
for every J ∈ I Σ . But in view of proposition 37 above, the maps ψJΣ and ψJ′Σ are
similar if and only if they have the same eigenvalues, with same multiplicity.
In case (i), the three multiplicities are NA2 + NA3 > NA3 > NA1 (the second
inequality is strict since we avoid the case Γ = A3 ), whence the result.
In case (ii), the four multiplicities are NB2 + NB3 + NB4 > NB3 + NB4 > NB4 =
NB1 (the first inequality is strict since we avoid the case Γ = A4 ), so ψJΣ and ψJ′Σ
are similar if and only if d2 = d′2 , ddˇ = d′ ď′ and {dˇ2 , df } = {ď′ 2 , d′ f ′ }. And these
ˇ f ) = ±(d′ , ď′ , f ′ ).
three equalities are clearly equivalent to (d, d,
Remark 40. The case Γ = A3 (resp. A4 ) can be dealt with as in case (i) (resp. (ii))
of the previous proposition and its proof, but the criterion of similarity of ψJΣ and
TWISTED LAWRENCE-KRAMMER REPRESENTATIONS
21
ˇ f } = {ď′ , f ′ }
ψJ′Σ for J of type A (resp. B) as then to be relaxed to d = d′ and {d,
2 ′ ′
2
2
′2 ′ ′
′
ˇ
ˇ
(resp. {d , dd} = {d , d ď } and {d , df } = {ď , d f }).
The case Γ = A2 is trivial since then I Σ = {I}, VKΣ = KeΘI ⊕ KeΘ′I , and ψIΣ
(resp. ψI′Σ ) is the homothety of ratio bcf (resp. b′ c′ f ′ ). Hence in this case, the
twisted LK-representations ψ Σ and ψ ′Σ are equivalent if and only if bcf = b′ c′ f ′ .
Theorem 41. Assume that Γ 6= A2 and that condition (⋆) holds for both ψ and
ˇ f ) 6=
ψ ′ , for the same morphism ρ : R → R0 if Γ = A3 or Γ = A2n . Then if (d, d,
′ ′
′
Σ
′Σ
(d , ď , f ), the twisted LK-representations ψ and ψ are not equivalent over K.
Proof. Under condition (⋆), the elements d, dˇ and f are pairwise distinct since
ˇ the result
their image by ρ are positive, negative and zero respectively (for d,
2
ˇ
follows from the identity dd = −bc). Similarly, the elements df , d , ddˇ and dˇ2 are
ˇ < 0, ρ(d2 ) > 0 and ρ(dˇ2 ) > 0,
pairwise distinct : indeed, we get ρ(df ) = 0, ρ(dd)
2
2
2
2
ˇ
ˇ
ˇ
and d 6= d since d − d = (d − d)a and hence ρ(d2 − dˇ2 ) > 0.
The analogue occurs for ψ ′ and hence the results of corollary 39 and remark
40 applies. This gives the result if Γ 6= A2n , A3 . If Γ = A2n , n > 3, then
ˇ f ) 6= ±(d′ , ď′ , f ′ ), but we clearly have
the condition stated in corollary 39 is (d, d,
′ ′
′
′
ˇ
(d, d, f ) 6= −(d , ď , f ) since ρ(d) and ρ(d ) are positive, whence the result in that
case. Similarly for Γ = A3 (resp. A4 ), the condition of non-equivalence derived
ˇ f } 6= {ď′ , f ′ } (resp. {d2 , dd}
ˇ =
from remark 40 should be d 6= d′ or {d,
6 {d′2 , d′ ď′ } or
2
′
′
′
2
ˇ f } = {ď′ , f } is equivalent to (d,
ˇ f ) = (ď′ , f ′ )
{dˇ , df } 6= {ď′ , d f }). But here {d,
′
′
since ρ(d) and ρ(d ) are positive and ρ(f ) = ρ(f ) = 0, whence the result for
Γ = A3 . Finally for Γ = A4 , since the images by ρ of d2 , dˇ2 , d′2 and ď′ 2 (resp.
of ddˇ and d′ ď′ , resp. of df and d′ f ′ ) are positive (resp. negative, resp. zero), the
ˇ = {d′2 , d′ ď′ } and {dˇ2 , df } = {ď′ 2 , d′ f ′ } of remark 40 is equivalent
condition {d2 , dd}
2
2
ˇ f ) = (d′ , ď′ , f ′ ) since, again, ρ(d)
ˇ
ˇ
to (d , dd, d , df ) = (d′2 , d′ ď′ , ď′ 2 , d′ f ′ ), i.e. (d, d,
′
and ρ(d ) are positive.
Let us finally turn to the case of the Coxeter type Bn by considering three twisted
′
′′
+
LK-representations ψ Σ , ψ ′Σ and ψ ′′Σ of BB
induced by three LK-representations
n
+
+
+
′
′′
ψ, ψ and ψ of BΓ , BΓ′ and BΓ′′ respectively, where Γ = A2n−1 , Γ′ = Dn+1 and
Γ′′ = A2n .
′′
The twisted LK-representation ψ ′′Σ is clearly non-equivalent to the two others
′′
since it is of dimension |Φ+
Γ′′ /Σ | = n(n+1) whereas the two others are of dimension
′
+
+
′
2
|ΦΓ /Σ| = |ΦΓ′ /Σ | = n . The following proposition proves that ψ Σ ans ψ ′Σ are not
equivalent, under the usual assumptions on the parameters (a, b, c, d) and (fi )i∈I of
ψ, and (a′ , b′ , c′ , d′ ) and (fi′ )i∈I ′ of ψ ′ . We set as above dˇ = a − d and f = fi (eαi )
for any i ∈ I.
Proposition 42. Assume that d, dˇ and f (resp. df , d2 , ddˇ and dˇ2 ) are pairwise
distinct, and that the analogue holds for ψ ′ , which is the case for example if condition (⋆) holds for both ψ and ψ ′ . Then the twisted LK-representations ψ Σ and
′
ψ ′Σ are not equivalent over K.
Proof. The fact that condition (⋆) implies the given conditions on the parameters
has been shown in the proof of theorem 42. But then proposition 37 applies and
+
shows that the images by ψ and ψ ′ of a given standard generator of BB
do not
n
have the same number of eigenvalues, whence the result.
22
ANATOLE CASTELLA
References
[1] S. Bigelow. Braid groups are linear. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), 471–486.
[2] N. Bourbaki. Groupes et Algèbres de Lie, Chapitres IV-VI. Hermann, Paris, 1968.
[3] E. Brieskorn, K. Saito. Artin-Gruppen und Coxeter-Gruppen. Invent. Math. 17 (1972),
245–271.
[4] A. Castella. Automorphismes et admissibilité dans les groupes de Coxeter et les monoı̈des
d’Artin-Tits. PhD Thesis, Orsay (2006).
[5] A. Castella. Admissible submonoids of Artin-Tits monoids. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212
(2008), 1594–1611.
[6] A. Castella. On Lawrence-Krammer representations. J. Algebra 322 (2009), 3614-3639.
[7] A.M. Cohen, D.A.H. Gijsbers, D.B. Wales. BMW algebras of simply laced type. J. Algebra
286 (2005), 107–153.
[8] A.M. Cohen, D.B. Wales. Linearity of Artin groups of finite type. Israel. J. Math. 131
(2002), 101–123.
[9] J. Crisp. Symmetrical subgroups of Artin groups. Adv. in Math. 152 (2000), 159–177.
[10] J. Crisp. Erratum to ”Symmetrical subgroups of Artin groups”. Adv. in Math. 179 (2003),
318–320.
[11] V. V. Deodhar. On the root system of a Coxeter group. Comm. Algebra 10 (1982), 611–630.
[12] F. Digne. On the linearity of Artin Braid groups. J. Algebra 268 (2003), 39-57.
[13] J.-Y. Hée. Systèmes de racines sur un anneau commutatif totalement ordonné. Geom. Dedic.
37 (1991), 65–102.
[14] J.-Y. Hée. Une démonstration simple de la fidélité de la représentation de LawrenceKrammer-Paris. J. Algebra 321 (2009), 1039-1048.
[15] D. Krammer. The braid group B4 is linear. Invent. Math. 142 (2000), 451-486.
[16] D. Krammer. Braid groups are linear. Ann. of Math. 155 (2002), 131-156.
[17] R. J. Lawrence. Homological representations of the Hecke algebra. Commun. Math. Phys.
135 (1990), 141–191.
[18] I. Marin. Sur les représentations de Krammer génériques. Ann. Inst. Fourier 57 (2007),
1883-1925.
[19] I. Marin. Krammer representations for complex braid groups. Preprint (2008).
[20] J. Michel. A note on words in braid monoids. J. Algebra 215 (1999), 366–377.
[21] B. Mühlherr. Coxeter groups in Coxeter groups. Finite Geometry and Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press (1993), 277–287.
[22] L. Paris. Braid monoids inject in their groups. Comment. Math. Helv. 77 (2002), 609–637.
[23] M. G. Zinno. On Krammer’s representation of the braid group. Math. Ann. 321 (2001),
197–211.
Université Paris-Sud 11, Mathématiques - Bât. 425, 91 405 Orsay, France.
E-mail address : [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
BEN HAYES AND ANDREW SALE
arXiv:1601.03286v1 [math.GR] 13 Jan 2016
Abstract. Given sofic approximations for countable, discrete groups G, H, we construct a sofic approximation for their wreath product G ≀ H.
Sofic groups, introduced by Gromov [10] and developed by Weiss [19], are a large class
of groups which can be approximated, in some sense, by finite groups.
There are many examples, including all amenable groups, all residually finite groups,
and all linear groups (by Malcev’s Theorem). However, because of the weakness of the
approximation by finite groups, few permanence properties of soficity are properly understood. Relatively straight-forward examples include closure under direct product and
increasing unions, and the soficity of residually sofic groups. More substantial results
generally require some amenability assumption. For example, an amalgamated product
of two sofic groups is know to be sofic if the amalgamated subgroup is amenable (see
[9],[15],[4],[17]). This was extended to encompass the fundamental groups of all graphs
of groups with sofic vertex groups and amenable edge groups [3]. In the same paper,
it is shown that the graph product of sofic groups is sofic. Also, if H is sofic and is a
coamenable subgroup of G, then G is sofic too [8].
We prove a new permanence result, namely that soficity is closed under taking wreath
products:
Theorem 1. Let G, H be countable, discrete, sofic groups. Then G ≀ H is sofic.
We remark that our result is general and requires no amenability or residual finiteness
assumptions. The special case of Theorem 1 when G is abelian was proved by Paunescu
[15], who used methods of analysis and the notion of sofic equivalence relations developed
by Elek and Lippner [5]. While finishing this paper, we learnt that Holt and Rees have
dealt with the case when H is residually finite and G sofic [12]. We prove the general
result directly, by constructing a sofic approximation for the wreath product, giving a
proof that is constructive, quantitative (see Proposition 2.1), and entirely self-contained.
The notion of hyperlinearlity gives a class of groups defined in a similar vein to sofic
groups, but where they are approximated instead by unitary groups. Our construction
extends to the situation where G is hyperlinear and H sofic, showing that G ≀ H is
hyperlinear, see [11].
Via their approximations by finite groups, sofic groups have applications to problems of
current mathematical interest in a wide area of fields. Sofic groups are relevant to ergodic
theory because they are the largest class of groups for which Bernoulli shifts are classified
by their base entropy (see [1],[13]) and for which Gottschalk’s surjuncitivity conjecture
holds (see e.g. [10],[13]). In the study of group rings they are useful because they are
the largest class of groups for which Kaplansky’s direct finiteness conjecture (see [6]) is
known. In the field of L2 –invariants, they are the largest class of groups for which the
determinant conjecture is known (see [7]), which is necessary to define L2 –torsion (see
[14] Conjecture 3.94). They are also the largest class of groups for which an analogue of
Lück approximation is known (see [18]). We refer the reader to [14] for applications of
L2 –invariants to geometry and group theory. See also [16],[2] for a survey of sofic groups.
Date: April 11, 2018.
1
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
2
Acknowledgments. The first named author would like to thank Jesse Peterson for
asking him if wreath products of sofic groups are sofic at the NCGOA Spring Institute in
2012 at Vanderbilt University.
1. Preliminaries
We begin with the necessary definitions, as well as a useful lemma to help us identify
sofic approximations in wreath products.
Definition 1. Let A be a finite set. The normalized Hamming distance, denoted dHamm ,
on Sym(A) is defined by
dHamm (σ, τ ) =
1
|{a ∈ A : σ(a) 6= τ (a)}|.
|A|
Definition 2. Let G be a countable discrete group, F a finite subset of G, and ε > 0.
Fix a finite set A and a function σ : G → Sym(A). We say that σ is (F, ε)–multiplicative
if
max dHamm (σ(g)σ(h), σ(gh)) < ε.
g,h∈F
We say that σ is (F, ε)–free if
min dHamm (σ(g), Id) > 1 − ε.
g∈F \{1}
We say that σ is an (F, ε)–sofic approximation if it is (F, ε)–multiplicative, (F, ε)–free,
and furthermore σ(1) = Id . Lastly, we say that G is sofic if for every finite F ⊆ G and
ε > 0, there is a finite set A and an (F, ε)–sofic approximation σ : G → Sym(A).
Our aim is to use sofic approximations for G and H and build a sofic approximation
for G ≀ H. First recall that the wreath product is defined as
M
G≀H =
G⋊H
H
L
where the action of h ∈ H is given via αh ∈ Aut ( H G), defined by
αh (gx )x∈H = (gh−1 x )x∈H .
A homomorphism π : L
G ≀ H → K, for some group K, can be decomposed into a pair of
homomorphisms π1 :
H G → K, π2 : H → K which satisfy the following equivariance
condition:
L
π2 (h)π1 (g) = π1 (αh (g))π2 (h), for all h ∈ H, g ∈ H G.
The following lemma gives an “approximate analogue” to this situation.
Lemma 1.1. Let G, H beLcountable, discrete groups. For every finite set F0 ⊆ G ≀ H
there are finite sets E1 ⊆ H G, E2 ⊆ H such that the following holds: Let ε > 0 and Ω
be a finite set. Suppose σ : G ≀ H → Sym(Ω) is a map such that
M
• the restriction of σ to
G is (E1 , ε/6)–multiplicative,
H
• the restriction of σ to H is (E2 , ε/6)–multiplicative,
•
•
max
g∈E1 ,h∈E2
max
g∈E1 ,h∈E2
dHamm σ(g, h), σ(g, 1)σ(1, h) < ε/6,
dHamm (σ(1, h)σ(g, 1), σ(αh (g), 1)σ(1, h)) < ε/6.
Then σ is (F0 , ε)–multiplicative.
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
3
Proof. After making the right definitions for E1 , E2 , we apply the triangle inequality several times to obtain the result. We require that if (g, h), (ĝ, ĥ) are in F0 , then g, ĝ, αh (ĝ) ∈
E1 , and h, ĥ ∈ E2 . This is true if we define
E1 = αh (g) : h ∈ πH (F0 ) ∪ {1}, g ∈ πG (F0 ) ,
E2 = πH (F0 ).
We leave verification that this is sufficient to the reader.
To see how this gives an “approximate analogue” of the situation for homomorphisms,
notice that the above lemma says that an approximate homomorphismL
σ : G≀H → Sym(A)
can be thought of as a pair of approximate homomorphisms σ1 :
H G → Sym(A),
σ2 : H → Sym(A) so that
σ2 (h)σ1 (g) ≈ σ1 (αh (g))σ2 (g)
L
for all g in a large enough finite subset of H G and all h in a large enough finite subset
of H. (Here we use ≈ to indicate that both maps agree on a sufficiently large subset of A).
It is not hard to see that the above lemma is valid with G≀H replaced with any semidirect
product and Sym(A) replaced with any group equipped with a bi-invariant metric.
2. The sofic approximation for wreath products
To facilitate our proof, we need to introduce some notation. Let G, H be countable
discrete groups and σA : G → Sym(A), σB : H → Sym(B) be two functions (not assumed
to be homomorphisms). For h ∈ H, b0 ∈ B, define
!
M
(h)
σA,b0 : G → Sym
A
B
by
(h)
ab )b∈B ,
σA,b0 (g) (ab )b∈B = (b
where
b
ab =
(
σA (g)(ab ),
ab ,
if b = σB (h)b0 ,
otherwise.
Now suppose that E ⊆ H is finite, and take a subset
B0 ⊆ {b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b for all h1 , h2 ∈ E with h1 6= h2 .}.
(h )
(h )
Note that σA,b1 0 (g1 ) and σA,b2 0 (g2 ) commute if b ∈ B0 , g1 , g2 ∈ G, h1 , h2 ∈ H and h1 6= h2 .
Thus it makes sense to define, for b ∈ B0 ,
!
M
M
σA,b :
G → Sym
A
E
by
B
Y (x)
σA,b (gx ).
σA,b (gx )x∈E =
x∈E
In our applications σB will be a sofic approximation, so we can take B0 to make up the
majority of B. Thus σA,b will be defined for “most” b ∈ B. We package all these maps
together as a single map
!
!
M
M
σc
G → Sym
A ⊕B
A:
E
by
σc
A (g)(a, b) =
B
(
σA,b (g)(a), b , if b ∈ B0
(a, b),
if b ∈ B \ B0 .
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
We extend σc
A to
define
L
H
4
L
L
/ E G. Now
G by declaring that σc
A (g) = Id if g ∈
H G, but g ∈
!
!
M
σc
A ⊕B
B : H → Sym
B
by
σc
B (h)(a, b) = a, σB (h)b .
Finally, define
σ
b : G ≀ H → Sym
by
M
!
A
B
⊕B
!
σ
b (g, h) = σc
c
A (g)σ
B (h).
Note that σ
b is determined by the choice of E, B0 and the two maps σA and σB .
Proposition 2.1. Let F ⊆ G ≀ H be finite and ε > 0. Then there are finite sets
EA ⊆ G, EB ⊆ H and an ε′ > 0 so that if σA : G → Sym(A) and σB : H → Sym(B)
are (EA , ε′ ), (EB , ε′ )–sofic approximations for G, H respectively, then σ
b is an (F, ε)–sofic
approximation.
The remainder of this section is dedicating to proving Proposition 2.1. We will see
below that it is possible to compute an explicit upper bound on ε′ . It will depend only
on ε and the set F .
We remark that σ
b(1, 1) = Id by construction. We need to show it is (F, ε)–multiplicative
and (F, ε)–free. First we explain how to define the sets E, EA and EB .
L
Let F ⊆ G ≀ H be finite and ε > 0. Define projections πG : G ≀ H →
H G and
πH : G ≀ H → H by πG (g, h) = g, πH (g, h) = h. Let E1 , E2 be as in Lemma 1.1 for the
finite set F0 = F ∪ {1} ∪ F −1 . As in the proof of Lemma 1.1, we have
E1 = αh (g) : h ∈ πH (F0 ), g ∈ πG (F0 ) ,
E2 = πH (F0 ).
Recall that for g = (gx )x∈H ∈ ⊕H G the support of g, denoted Supp(g), is the set of x ∈ H
with gx 6= 1. We set
[
E = E2 ∪
h Supp(g),
g∈E1
h∈E2
EA = gx ∈ G : (gx )x∈H ∈ E1 ,
EB = E −1 E.
Then our collections of finite sets satisfy the following properties, each of which we need
later on:
EA
⊇
{gx : (gx ) ∈ E1 , x ∈ E},
E
E
⊇
⊇
h Supp(g) for all h ∈ E2 , g ∈ E1 ,
E2 ,
EB
⊇
E ∪ E −1 ∪ E −1 E.
ε
Let σA : G → Sym(A), σB : H → Sym(B) be
Choose ε′ so that 0 < ε′ < 48|E|
2.
(EA , ε′ ), (EB , ε′ )–sofic approximations respectively. Set
B01 = {b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b for all h1 , h2 ∈ E, h1 6= h2 },
B02 = {b ∈ B : σB (h1 h2 )b = σB (h1 )σB (h2 )b for all h1 , h2 ∈ E},
B0 = B01 ∩ B02 .
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
5
Since σB is a sofic approximation, we can intuitively think of B0 as making up most of
the set B. Indeed, Lemma 2.2 below confirms this. Use the sets E ⊂ H, B0 ⊆ B and
the maps σA , σB to define the maps σc
c
b, as constructed at the start of this section.
A, σ
B, σ
We claim that the map σ
b is an (F, ε)–sofic approximation. We first make the following
preliminary observation.
Lemma 2.2. Let κ > 0. If ε′ <
Proof. Note that
κ
4|E|2
\
B01 =
then |B0 | ≥ (1 − κ)|B|.
{b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b},
h1 ,h2 ∈E
h1 6=h2
B02 =
\
{b ∈ B : σB (h1 )σB (h2 )b = σB (h1 h2 )b}.
h1 ,h2 ∈E
h1 6=h2
So
|B \ B01 |
≤
|B|
X
h1 ,h2 ∈E
h1 6=h2
|{b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b}|
.
1−
|B|
We have for all h1 , h2 ∈ E with h1 6= h2 :
|{b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b}|
|B|
= dHamm (σB (h1 ), σB (h2 ))
= dHamm (σB (h2 )−1 σB (h1 ), Id).
Since dHamm is a invariant under left multiplication, and EB ⊇ E ∪ E −1 we have that
−1
′
dHamm (σB (h2 )−1 , σB (h−1
2 )) = dHamm (Id, σB (h2 )σB (h2 )) < ε .
Inserting this into the above two inequalities and using that dHamm is invariant under
right multiplication we see that:
|{b ∈ B : σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b}|
|B|
=
dHamm (σB (h1 ), σB (h2 ))
=
dHamm (σB (h2 )−1 σB (h1 ), Id)
>
′
dHamm (σB (h−1
2 )σB (h1 ), Id) − ε
≥
dHamm (σB (h2−1 h1 ), Id) − 2ε′
>
1 − 3ε′ ,
where in the last two lines we again use that EB ⊇ E ∪ E −1 ∪ E −1 E. Thus
|B01 |
≥ (1 − 3 |E|2 ε′ ).
|B|
Similarly, (EB , ε′ )–multiplicativity of σB gives
X
|B02 |
≥1−
1 − dHamm σB (h1 h2 ), σB (h1 )σB (h2 ) ≥ 1 − |E|2 ε′ .
|B|
h1 ,h2 ∈E
This proves the Lemma.
ε
ε
and choose ε′ > 0 as in Lemma 2.2, so ε′ < 48|E|
Fix κ > 0 with κ < 12
2 . To complete
the proof of Proposition 2.1, we break it up into two steps: we first show that this choice
of ε′ gives us that σ
b is (F, ε)–multiplicative, and then show it is (F, ε)–free.
Step 1. We show that σ
b is (F, ε)–multiplicative.
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
6
To prove Step 1, we apply Lemma 1.1, verifying below the four necessary conditions.
We first check that the restriction to ⊕H G is (E1 , ε/6)–multiplicative. Let g, g ′ ∈ E1 ,
then
′
′
dHamm σc
c
c
A (gg ), σ
A (g)σ
A (g )
M
(a, b) : b ∈ B0 , σA,b (g)σA,b (g ′ ) 6= σA,b (gg ′ )
1
A
⊕
(B
\
B
)
+
≤
0
|A||B| |B| B
|A||B| |B|
1 X
≤κ+
dHamm (σA,b (g)σA,b (g ′ ), σA,b (gg ′ )).
|B|
b∈B0
Q
(x)
Write g = (gx ), g ′ = (gx′ ). Recall, σA,b (g) = x∈E σA,b (gx ). In the following, we use
that the different terms in the product commute, to be precise: for x1 6= x2 ∈ E we have
(x )
(x )
[σA,b1 (gx1 ), σA,b2 (gx′ 2 )] = 1. This gives
!
Y (x)
Y (x)
(x) ′
′
′
′
dHamm (σA,b (g)σA,b (g ), σA,b (gg )) = dHamm
σA,b (gx )σA,b (gx ),
σA,b (gx gx ) .
x∈E
x∈E
Next, using the bi-invariance of the Hamming distance, the triangle inequality, and the
(EA , ε′ )–multiplicativity of σA to see that
X
(x)
(x)
(x)
dHamm (σA,b (g)σA,b (g ′ ), σA,b (gg ′ )) ≤
dHamm σA,b (gx )σA,b (gx′ ), σA,b (gx gx′ )
x∈E
=
X
dHamm (σA (gx )σA (gx′ ), σA (gx gx′ ))
x∈E
<
|E| ε′ .
Thus we get the required multiplicativity:
′
′
′
dHamm (σc
c
c
A (gg ), σ
A (g)σ
A (g )) < κ + |E| ε <
ε
.
6
The fact that the restriction to H is (E2 , ε/6)–multiplicative is more straight-forward.
Indeed, for h, h′ ∈ E2 we have
′
′
′
′
′
dHamm (σc
c
c
B (hh ), σ
B (h)σ
B (h )) = dHamm (σB (hh ), σB (h)σB (h )) < ε ,
where we note that we can use the multiplicative property of σB since E2 ⊆ EB .
The third condition of Lemma 1.1 is automatically satisfied by σ
b, by construction. We
finish this step by verifying the bound on the Hamming distance between σ
b (1, h)b
σ (g, 1)
and σ
b (αh (g), 1)b
σ (1, h) for h ∈ E2 , g ∈ E1 . Indeed, for such g, h we have
dHamm (σc
c
c
c
B (h)σ
A (g), σ
A (αh (g))σ
B (h))
!
M
1
≤
A ⊕ B \ (B0 ∩ σB (h)−1 (B0 ))
|B|
|A| |B|
B
1
(a, b) : b ∈ B0 ∩ σB (h)−1 B0 , σA,b (g)a 6= σA,σB (h)b (αh (g))a
|A||B| |B|
1
(a, b) : b ∈ B0 ∩ σB (h)−1 B0 , σA,b (g)a 6= σA,σB (h)b (αh (g))a .
≤ 2κ +
|B|
|A| |B|
+
Since Supp(αh (g)) = h Supp(g), and E contains both Supp(g) and h Supp(g), it follows
that for every b ∈ B0 ∩ σB (h)−1 (B0 ) we have
Y
Y
(hx)
(x)
σA,σB (h)b (gx ).
σA,σB (h)b (gh−1 x ) =
σA,σB (h)b (αh (g)) =
x∈h Supp(g)
x∈Supp(g)
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
7
Note that we have used that σA (1) = Id to restrict the number of terms in the product.
(x)
(hx)
We use that for h ∈ E (and hence for h ∈ E2 ) we have that σA,σB (h)b (g) = σA,b (g).
Inserting this into the above equation we see that
Y
(x)
σA,b (g) = σA,b (g).
σA,σB (h)b (αh (g)) =
x∈Supp(g)
Returning to the above inequality, we have shown that the remaining sets involved are
empty, implying that
ε
dHamm (σc
c
c
c
B (h)σ
A (g), σ
A (αh (g))σ
B (h)) < 2κ < .
6
The hypotheses of Lemma 1.1 have been checked, completing Step 1.
Step 2. We show that σ
b is (F, ε)–free.
Suppose (g, h) ∈ F. If h 6= 1, then
Thus
(a, b) : σ
b(g, h)(a, b) 6= (a, b) ⊇
M
!
A
B
⊕ b ∈ B : σB (h)b 6= b .
dHamm σ
b(g, h), Id ≥ dHamm σB (h), Id ≥ 1 − ε′ > 1 − ε.
We may therefore assume that h = 1. When b ∈ B0 , the permutation σ
b(g, 1) will act by
(a, b) 7→ (σA,b (g)a, b), for all a ∈ ⊕B A. We then see that
!
!
M
(a, b) : σ
b (g, 1)(a, b) = (a, b) ⊆
A ⊕ B \ B0 ∪ (a, b) : b ∈ B0 , σA,b (g)a = a .
B
Assume g = (gx ) 6= 1 and consider the proportion of elements fixed by σ
b(g, 1). By the
above we have
L
1 X a ∈ B A : σA,b (g)a = a
1
(a, b) : σ
b(g, 1)(a, b) = (a, b) ≤ κ +
.
|B|
|A||B| |B|
|A||B|
b∈B0
Since g 6= 1, we can find x0 ∈ Supp(g). For every b ∈ B0 , we have that σB (h1 )b 6= σB (h2 )b
for every h1 , h2 ∈ Supp(g) with h1 6= h2 . It follows that the (σB (x0 )b)–coordinate of
σA,b (g)a is σA (gx0 )aβ , where aβ is the (σB (x0 )b)–coordinate of a. Thus
(
)
M
M
A ⊕ a ∈ A : σA (gx0 )a = a .
a∈
A : σA,b (g)a = a ⊆
B
So
B\{σB (x0 )b}
a∈
L
B
A : σA,b (g)a = a
|A||B|
≤ 1 − dHamm (σA (gx0 ), 1).
Since gx0 ∈ EA we can use the freeness of σA , yielding
1
|A||B| |B|
|{(a, b) : σ
b (g, 1)(a, b) = (a, b)}| ≤ κ +
|B0 |
(1 − dHamm (σA (g), 1)) ≤ κ + ε′ .
|B|
Equivalently,
dHamm (b
σ (g, 1), Id) ≥ 1 − κ − ε′ > 1 − ε.
This verifies that σ
b is (F, ε)–free, and thus completes the proof of Proposition 2.1, and
hence of Theorem 1.
THE WREATH PRODUCT OF TWO SOFIC GROUPS IS SOFIC
8
References
[1] L. Bowen. Measure conjugacy invariants for actions of countable sofic groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc,
23:217–245, 2010.
[2] V. Caprao and M. Lupini Introduction to sofic and hyerlinear groups and Connes’ embedding conjecutre. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 2136:2015.
[3] L. Ciobanu, D. Holt and S. Rees. Sofic groups: graph products and graphs of groups. Pacific Journal
of Mathematics,271:53–64,2014.
[4] K. Dykema, D. Kerr, and M. Pichot. Sofic dimension for discrete measurable groupoids. Trans.
Amer. Math. Soc, 366(2);707–748,2014.
[5] G. Elek and G. Lippner. Sofic equivalence relations. Journal of Functional Analysis, 258:1692–1708,
2010.
[6] G. Elek and E. Szabó. Sofic groups and direct finiteness. J. Algebra, 280:426-434, 2004.
[7] G. Elek and E. Szabó. Hyperlinearity, essentially free actions and L2 -invariants. The sofic property.
Math. Ann, 332:421-441, 2005.
[8] G. Elek and E. Szabó. On sofic groups. Journal of Group Theory, 9(2):161–171, 2006.
[9] G. Elek and E. Szabó. Sofic representations of amenable groups. Proceedings of the AMS,
139(2011):4285–4291.
[10] M. Gromov. Endomorphisms of symbolic algebraic varieties. J. Eur. Math. Soc., 1(2):109–197, 1999.
[11] B. Hayes. Hyperlinear wreath sofic is hyperlinear.
https://sites.google.com/site/benhayeshomepage/home/research-notes.
[12] D. Holt and S. Rees. Some closure results for C–aproximable groups. arXiv:1601.01836.
[13] D. Kerr and H. Li. Topological entropy and the variational principle for actions of sofic groups.
Invent. Math, 186:501–558, 2011.
[14] W. Lück. L2 -Invariants: Theory and Applications to Geometry and K-theory. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 2002.
[15] L. Paunescu. On sofic actions and equivalence relations. Journal of Functional Analysis, 261(9):2461–
2485, 2011.
[16] V.G. Pestov. Hyperlinear and sofic groups: A brief guide. Bull. Symb. Logic, 14:449-480, 2008.
[17] S. Popa. Independence properties in subalgebras of ultraproduct. II1 factors. Journal of Functional
Analysis, 266(9):5818-5846, 2014.
[18] A. Thom. Sofic groups and Diophantine approximation. Communcations on Pure and Applied
Mathematics 61(8):1155-1171, 2008.
[19] B. Weiss. Sofic groups and dynamical systems. Sankshyā. Ser. A 62(3):350-359, 2000.
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240
E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
Hall-Littlewood-PushTASEP and its KPZ limit
Promit Ghosal
arXiv:1701.07308v1 [math.PR] 25 Jan 2017
Columbia University
Department of Statistics, 1255 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027
e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract: We study a new model of interactive particle systems which we call the randomly activated cascading exclusion process (RACEP). Particles wake up according to
exponential clocks and then take a geometric number of steps. If another particle is encountered during these steps, the first particle goes to sleep at that location and the
second is activated and proceeds accordingly. We consider a totally asymmetric version
of this model which we refer as Hall-Littlewood-PushTASEP (HL-PushTASEP) on Z≥0
lattice where particles only move right and where initially particles are distributed according to Bernoulli product measure on Z≥0 . We prove KPZ-class limit theorems for the
height function fluctuations. Under a particular weak scaling, we also prove convergence
to the solution of the KPZ equation.
Keywords and phrases: Stochastic six vertex model, KPZ universality, Interacting
particle system.
Contents
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 Model and main results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3 Transition Matrix & Laplace Transform . . . . . . . . . .
4 Asymptotics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5 Weak Scaling Limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
A Fredholm Determinant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B eigenfunction of the Transition Matrix in HL-PushTASEP
C Moment Formula . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
4
14
21
43
61
63
66
69
1. Introduction
We introduce and study a special class of interacting particle systems which we call randomly
activated cascading exclusion processes (RACEP). Fix a directed graph G = (V, E) with
conductances ce (i.e., non-negative weights) along directed edges e ∈ E and define a random
walk measure as the Markov chain on vertices with transition probability from v to v ′ given
by cv→v′ normalized by the sum of all conductances out of v. The state space for RACEP is
{0, 1}V where 1 denotes a particle and 0 denotes a hole. Each particle is activated according
to independent Poisson clocks. Once active, a particle moves randomly to one its adjacent
sites. Therein, it chooses an independent random number of steps according to a geometric
distribution and then performs an independent random walk (according to the random walk
measure just described) of that many steps. However, if along that random walk trajectory,
the first particle arrives at a site occupied by a second particle, then, the first particle stays
1
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
2
at that site (and goes back to sleep) and the second particle becomes active and proceeds
as if its Poisson clock had rung (according to the above rules). The Poisson clock activation
processes are supposed to model a much slower process than the random walk cascades, so for
simplicity we assume that these random walk cascades occur instantaneously. There is some
work necessary to prove well-definedness of this process in general, and we do not pursue that
here since we will mainly focus on one concrete case.
RACEP is a special type of exclusion process (see, e.g. [Lig05, Lig99]) in which the jump
distribution depends on the state around the particle in a rather non-trivial way. Exclusion
processes are important models of lattice gases, transport (such as in various ecological or biological contexts), traffic, and queues in series (see for example [SCN10, Cor12] and references
therein). The prototypical example of an exclusion process is the asymmetric simple exclusion
process (ASEP) which was introduced in the biology literature in 1968 [MGP68] (see also
more recent applications such as in [CSN05, GS10]) and two years later in the probability
literature [Spi70].
RACEP can also be thought of as a variant of a frog model (see, e.g. [AMP02, AMPR01]) in
which particles do not fall asleep once active but continue to move and wake up other particles.
A natural interpolation between RACEP and the frog model is to have the probability that
a particle goes back to sleep be in (0, 1). These relations to exclusion processes and frog
models suggest a number of natural probabilistic questions for RACEP, such as understanding
its hydrodynamic and fluctuation limit theorems for various families of infinite graphs with
simple conductances. We attack these questions exactly for the special case of RACEP in
which the underlying graph is Z≥0 and the random walk is totally asymmetric (in the positive
direction). From here on out, we will only focus on this one-dimensional case of RACEP.
ASEP and RACEP on Z are siblings in that they both arise as (different) special limits
of the stochastic six vertex model [GS92, BCG16] – see Section 2.2. They are, in fact, part
of a broader hierarchy of integrable probability particle systems which are solvable due to
connections to quantum integrable systems – see [CP16, BP16a, BP16b]. A totally asymmetric
version of RACEP also comes up as a marginal of certain continuous time RSK-type dynamics
which preserve the class of Hall-Littlewood processes – see [BBW16] wherein they refer to
RACEP as the t-pushTASEP due to its similarity with the model of q-PushTASEP [BP16a,
CP15]. Here, we are mostly interested in this one dimensional totally asymmetric specialization
of RACEP. To avoid the confusion with the time parameter t, we refer RACEP as HallLittlewood-PushTASEP (HL-PushTASEP) throughout the rest of the paper.
These systems enjoy many concise and exact formulas from which one can readily perform
asymptotics. Such results for ASEP go back to the now seminal papers [TW08, TW11] (and
earlier to [Joh00] for TASEP), and results for the stochastic six vertex model were worked out
in [BCG16, AB16]. In our present paper, we work out the analogous asymptotics for the HLPushTASEP on Z≥0 using the approach of [BCG16]. (We also provide some additional details
in the asymptotics compared to the previous works.) Owing to the recent work [Bor16, BO16]
such asymptotics could alternatively be performed via reduction to Schur process asymptotics.
We do not pursue that route here and instead opt for the more direct (albeit technically
demanding) route.
The asymptotic results we show for HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 (as well as those previously
shown for ASEP and the stochastic six vertex model) demonstrate its membership in the
Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class (see, e.g. the review [Cor12] and references therein).
In particular, in Theorem 2.4 we show that for step Bernoulli initial data, HL-PushTASEP
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
3
has fluctuations in its rarefaction fan of order t1/3 and with statistics determined by the
GUE Tracy-Widom distribution. At the edge of the rarefaction fan, we also demonstrate the
occurrence the Baik-Ben Arous-Péché crossover distributions in [BBAP05] which arises also
in ASEP [TW09b], TASEP [BBAP05, BAC11], and the stochastic six vertex model [AB16].
See [Cor14] for further references to asymptotics of other integrable probabilistic systems. The
centering and scaling that our result demonstrates agrees with the predictions of KPZ scaling
theory from the physics literature – see Section 2.4.
The KPZ scaling theory also suggests that under certain weak scalings a broad class of
interacting particle systems should converge to the Cole-Hopf solution to the KPZ stochastic
PDE (i.e., the KPZ equation). There are, in fact, many different choices of weak scalings under
which the KPZ equation remains statistically invariant (see, e.g.[QS15, Section 2.4]). The main
motivation for our present investigation into the KPZ equation limit for HL-PushTASEP was
our desire to solve the analogous question for the stochastic six vertex model. Let us briefly
explain why that question is difficult and what our HL-PushTASEP results suggest regarding
it.
For ASEP under weak asymmetry scaling, the KPZ equation limit was proved in [BG97]
(see also [ACQ11, DT16, CST16]). That work relies upon two main identities. The first is the
Gärtner (or microscopic Cole-Hopf) transform which turns ASEP into a discrete stochastic
heat equation (SHE). The second is a non-trivial key identity (Proposition 4.8 and Lemma A.1
in [BG97]) which allows one to identify white-noise as the limit of the martingale part of
the discrete SHE. For the stochastic six vertex model, one still has an analogous Gärtner
transform (in fact, this holds for all higher-spin vertex models in the hierarchy of [CP16] due
to the duality shown therein). The discrete time nature of the stochastic six vertex model,
however, renders the identification of the white-noise much more complicated and presently
it is unclear how to proceed.
For higher-spin vertex models with unbounded particle occupation capacity, [CT15] proved
convergence to the KPZ equation under certain weak scalings. Even though these models are
still discrete time, the scaling was such that the overall particle density goes to zero with the
scaling parameter ǫ. Owing to that fact, there was no need for an analog of the key estimate
used in the case of ASEP.
Our present analysis of HL-PushTASEP also involves a weak scaling under which the local
density of particles goes to zero. Consequently, we are able to prove the KPZ limit without the
key estimate. This suggests that it may be simpler to derive the KPZ equation directly from
the stochastic six vertex model (or other finite-spin integrable stochastic vertex models) when
the weak scaling facilitates local density decay to zero. Indeed, there are many different weak
scalings which should all lead to the KPZ equation. This can be anticipated, for instance, from
analyzing moment or one-point distribution formulas, see e.g. [BO16, Section 12]. We intend
on investigating such zero-density KPZ equation limits of the stochastic six vertex model in
subsequent work.
There is another approach for proving KPZ limit of particle system (when started from their
invariant measure) via energy solutions. This approach was introduced by Assing [Ass02] and
then significantly developed in [GJ14, GP15]. The invariant measure is Bernoulli product
measure for HL-PushTASEP (as well as for the stochastic six vertex model), so it would
be interesting to see if these methods apply. Presently, the energy solution approach is only
developed for continuous time systems, so an analysis of the stochastic six vertex model results
would require developing a discrete time variant.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
4
Outline
We introduced above RACEP in an arbitrary infinite directed graph. In Section 2, we describe
the dynamics of HL-PushTASEP in one dimension and its connection with stochastic six
vertex model. Further, we state our results on asymptotic fluctuation and KPZ limit of HLPushTASEP in Section 2. At the end of this section, we explain the KPZ scaling theory for
HL-PushTASEP in brief. In Section 3, we first derive the eigenfunctions of the transition
matrix of HL-PushTASEP and then use it to get Fredholm determinant formulas. Section 4
contains the proof of the limiting fluctuation results under the assumption of step Bernoulli
initial data. Interestingly, we see a phase transition in the limiting behavior of the fluctuation.
In Section 5, we prove the KPZ limit theory for HL-PushTASEP. First, we start with the
construction of a discrete SHE. Next, we prove few estimates on the discrete heat kernel
and subsequently, show the tightness of the rescaled SHE. At the end, we elaborate on the
equivalence of all the limit points by solving the martingale problem for HL-PushTASEP.
Acknowledgements
Special thanks are due to Ivan Corwin for suggesting the problem and guiding throughout this
work. We thank Guillaume Barraquand and Peter Nejjar for several constructive comments
on the first draft of this paper. We would also like to thank Li-Cheng Tsai and Rajat Subhra
Hazra for helpful discussions.
2. Model and main results
We now define the HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 , describe its connection to the stochastic six vertex
model, and then state our main results. Theorems 2.4 and 2.5 give the fluctuations limits for
HL-PushTASEP started with step Bernoulli initial data. Theorem 2.9 and 2.10 contain the
KPZ equation limits for HL-PushTASEP under weak scaling given in Definition 2.7.
2.1. HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0
We will consider HL-PushTASEP with a finite number of particles supported on Z≥0 . The
dynamics of HL-PushTASEP are such that the behavior of particles restricted to the interval
[0, L] is Markov. Thus, even if we are interested in HL-PushTASEP with an infinite number
of particles, if we only care about events involving the restriction to finite intervals, then it
suffices to consider the finite particle number version we define here.
The N -particle HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 has state at time t given by (x1 (t), . . . , xN (t))
where xi (t) ∈ Z≥0 for all t ∈ R+ and x1 (t) < . . . < xN (t). For notational simplicity we add
two virtual particles fixed for all time so that x0 = −1 and xN +1 = +∞. For later reference,
we denote the state space of N -particle HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 by
X N := ~x = (−1 = x0 < x1 < x2 < . . . < xN < xN +1 = ∞) : ∀i, xi ∈ Z≥0 .
We illustrate typical moves in HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 in Fig 1 and Fig 2. Each of the
particles in HL-PushTASEP carries an exponential clock of rate 1. When the clock in a particle
rings, it jumps to the right. Unlike the simple exclusion processes, if the particle at xm (t) gets
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
xm−2 (t)
xm−1 (t)
xm (t)
xm+1 (t)
5
xm+2 (t)
Fig 1: Assume that particle at xm (t) (colored green) becomes active at time t. It immediately
takes a step to the right and then continues to jump according to a geometric distribution
with parameter b. Thus, the probability that it takes a jump of exactly size 2 is b(1 − b). With
probability b2 it reaches the position of xm+1 (t) (colored red). In that scenario, the green
particle occupies the position xm+1 (t) and activates the red particle as shown in Fig. 2.
xm−2 (t)
xm−1 (t)
xm (t)
xm+1 (t)
xm+2 (t)
Fig 2: Once red particle has been activated, it moves by one to the right, and then proceeds
according to the same rules which had governed the green particle. For instance, it can jump
by j steps with probability (1 − b)bj−1 for 1 ≤ j < xm+2 (t) − xm+1 (t) and with probability
bj−1 if j = xm+2 (t) − xm+1 (t). We illustrated here the cases when j equals xm+2 (t) − xm+1 (t)
and xm+2 (t) − xm+1 (t) − 1.
excited at time t, then it can jump j steps to the right with a geometric probability (1− b)bj−1
for 1 ≤ j < xm+1 (t) − xm (t). It can also knock its neighbor on the right side at xm+1 (t) out
from its position with probability bxm+1 (t)−xm (t)−1 . In that case, particle at position xm+1 (t)
will also get excited and jumps in the same way independently to others. To be precise, the
HL-PushTASEP shares a large extent of resemblance with the particle dynamics in the case
of stochastic six vertex model (SSVM) (see, [BCG16, Section 2.2]). Although the dynamics in
latter case is governed by a discrete time process, but pushing effect of the particles comes into
play in the same way. We embark more upon the connection between these two model later
in the following section. One can see similar pushing mechanism in the case of Push-TASEP
[BF08], q-PushASEP[CP15] which are also continuous time countable state space Markov
processes. But in contrast with the HL-PushTASEP, each of the particles in those cases can
only jump by one step when their clocks ring.
For HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 , we are interested in studying the evolution of the empirical
particles counts, i.e, for any ν ∈ R, what is the limit shape and fluctuation of the number of
particles in an interval [0, ⌊νt⌋] as the time evolves to infinity. One can note that empirical
particle counts fits into the stereotype of the height function for the exclusion processes. In
what follows, we provide the explicit definitions of the height function and the step Bernoulli
initial condition.
Definition 2.1. Fix a positive integer N . Define a function Nx (t; .) and ηt (x; .) of ~x = (x1 <
x2 < . . . < xN ) ∈ X N via
1 xi = x for some i.
Nx (t; ~x) = #{i; xi ≤ x}, ηx (t; ~x) =
0
otherwise.
For the rest of the paper, we prefer to use Nx (t) and ηt (x) instead of Nx (t; ~x) and ηt (x; ~x)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
6
with the understanding that those are evaluated at ~x. We call Nx (t) as the height function of
HL-PushTASEP and ηt (x) as the occupation variable.
Definition 2.2 (Step Bernoulli Initial Data). Fix any positive integers L. In step Bernoulli
initial condition with parameter ρ over [0, L], each integer lattice site is occupied by a particle with probability ρ independently of others. Whenever ρ = 1, we refer it as step initial
condition.
2.2. Connection with Stochastic Six Vertex Model
Six vertex model was first studied in [Lie67] to compute the residual entropy of the ice structure. One can think of six vertex model as a lattice model where the configurations are the
assignments of six different types of H2 O molecular structure to the vertices of a square grid
so that O atoms are at the vertices of the grid. To each O atoms, there are two H atoms
attached so that they are at the angles 90◦ or 180◦ to each other. Later, a stochastic version of the six vertex model was introduced by Gwa and Spohn in [GS92]. Recently, several
new discoveries related to the stochastic six vertex model came into light in works including [BCG16, BP16a, BP16b, AB16, Agg16]. Furthermore, there are three equivalent ways
of describing stochastic six vertex model: (i) as a ferro-electric asymmetric six vertex model
on a long rectangle with specific vertex weights (see, [GS92] or [BCG16, Section 2.2]); (ii)
as an interacting particle system subject to the pushing effect and exclusion of mass (see,
[BCG16, Section 2.2], [GS92]); or (iii) as a probability measure on directed path ensemble
(see, [BP16a, Section 1], [AB16, Section 1.1]). In what follows, we elaborate in details on the
second description of stochastic six vertex model.
Particle dynamics of stochastic six vertex model is governed by a discrete time Markov
chain with local interactions. Fix b1 , b2 ∈ [0, 1]. Consider a particle configuration Yb1 ,b2 (t) =
(y1 (t) < y2 (t) < . . .) at time t where 0 < b1 , b2 < 1. Then, at time t + 1, each particle decides
with probability b1 whether it will stay in its position, or not. If not, then it moves to the
right for j steps with probability (1 − b2 )b2j−1 where j can be any integer in between 1 and
the distance of the right neighbor from the particle. Further, the particle at yi (t) can jump to
yi+1 (t) with probability byi+1 (t)−yi (t)−1 . In that case, the particle which was initially at yi+1 (t)
is pushed towards right by one step and starts to move in the same way.
It has been noted in [BCG16, Section 2.2] that the dynamics of the limit
Y b (t) := lim Y1−ǫ,b (tǫ−1 )
ǫ→0
(2.1)
are those of HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 . Similarly, they show that the dynamics of
Z p,q (t) := lim {Yǫp,ǫq (tǫ−1 ) − tǫ−1 }
ǫ→0
are those of ASEP with jump parameters p and q (see also [Agg16]). For any finite particle
configuration, it is easy to show that the limiting dynamics in (2.1) indeed matches with HLPushTASEP on Z≥0 . Heuristically, this is attributed to the facts that in an time interval [t, t+
∆t], (i) the expected number of jumps for each of the particles of the limiting process Y b (t)
varies linearly with ∆t and (ii) the probability of more than one jumps decays quadratically
with ∆t. In particular, (i) shows the number of jumps of each of the particles follows a Poisson
point process with intensity 1 and (ii) shows that the Poisson clocks in all particles are
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
7
independent of each other. In the case of countable particle configurations, one can complete
the proof of the convergence of stochastic six vertex model to HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 using
the similar arguments as in [Agg16].
2.3. Main Results
In the following theorems, we state the asymptotic phase transition result for the height
function Nνt (t) of HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 under the step Bernoulli initial data. Let us explain the scalings used in the paper. Assume that initial condition for the HL-PushTASEP
dynamics is step Bernoulli with parameter ρ. Thus, it is expected that the macroscopic
density of the particles varies between 0 to ρ. In fact, it will be shown that whenever
ν ≤ (1 − b)−1 , then macroscopic density around νt will be 0. Furthermore, in the case when
(1 − b)−1 < ν < (1 − ρ)−2 (1 − b)−1 , macroscopic density varies as 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 around
the position νt. Consequently, one can expect KPZ scaling theory to hold in such scenario.
On the contrary, when ν > (1 − ρ)−2 (1 − b)−1 , density profile around the position νt turns out
to be flat, thus yielding the gaussian fluctuation. Before stating the theorems, we must define
three distributions, namely the GUE Tracy-Widom distribution, square of GOE Tracy-Widom
distribution and Gaussian distribution which will arise as limits in three different scenario.
Definition 2.3. (1) Consider a piecewise linear curve Γ(1) consists of two linear segments:
from ∞e−iπ/3 to 0 and from 0 to ∞eiπ/3 . The distribution function FGU E (x) of the GUE
Tracy-widom distributions is defined by FGU E (x) = det(I + KAi )L2 (Γ(1) ) where KAi is the
Airy kernel. For any w, w′ ∈ Γ(1) , Airy kernel is expressed as
Z e2πi/3 ∞ w3 /3−sw
1
e
1
′
dv
KAi (w, w ) =
3 /3−sv
v
2πi e−2πi/3 ∞ e
(v − w)(v − w′ )
where the contour of v is piecewise linear from −1 + e−2πi/3 ∞ to −1 to −1 + e2πi/3 ∞. It
is important to note that the real part of v − w is always negative.
(2) Let δ > 0. Consider a piecewise linear curve Γ(2) which is composed of two linear segments:
2
from −δ + ∞e−iπ/3 to −δ and from −δ to −δ + ∞eiπ/3 . Then, the FGOE
is defined by
2
FGOE (xs) = det(I + KGOE,2 )L2 (Γ(2) ) where KGOE,2 is given by
1
KGOE,2 (w, w ) =
2πi
′
Z
−2δ+∞e2πi/3
−2δ+∞e−2πi/3
3
v
ew /3−sw
1
dv
3 /3−sv
′
v
(v − w)(v − w ) w
e
for aany w, w′ ∈ Γ(2) . The contour of v is piecewise linear from −2δ + ∞e−2πi/3 to −2δ
to −2δ + ∞e2πi/3 .
(3) For completeness, we also add here a very brief description of the Gaussian distribution.
Density of the standard Gaussian distribution function Φ(x) is given by
2
x
1
√ exp −
.
2
2π
Theorem 2.4. Consider HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 . Assume initial data is step Bernoulli data.
−1
Set α = 1−ρ
ρ . Let us also fix a real number ν > (1 − b) . Define the parameters,
p
p
p
b1/3 ( ν(1 − b) − 1)2/3
( ν(1 − b) − 1)2
, σν :=
,
̺
:=
b(
ν(1 − b) − 1),
mν :=
1−b
(1 − b)1/2 ν 1/6
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
1
ν
−
,
m̃ν :=
1 + α α(1 − b)
σ̃ν :=
s
8
ν(1 − b)(1 − ρ)2 − 1
.
α2 (1 − b)
(a) If ρ > 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P
t→∞
= FGU E (s).
(2.2)
2
= FGOE
(s).
(2.3)
(2.4)
mν t − Nνt (t)
≤s
σν t1/3
mν t − Nνt (t)
≤s
σν t1/3
(b) If ρ = 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P
t→∞
(c) If ρ < 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P
t→∞
m̃ν t − Nνt (t)
≤s
σ̃ν t1/2
= Φ(s).
Let us denote the position of m-th particle at time t by xm (t). To this end, one can note
that for any y, t ∈ R+ and m ∈ Z≥0 , the event {Ny (t) ≥ m} is same as the event {xm (t) ≤ y}.
Thus, Theorem 2.4 translates to the following results (noted down below) in terms of the
particle position xm (t).
Theorem 2.5. Continuing with all the notations introduced in Theorem 2.4 above, we have
(a) if ρ > 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P xtmν (t) ≤ νt +
t→∞
∂mν
∂ν
−1
∂mν
∂ν
−1
1/3
!
= FGU E (s),
(2.5)
σν st1/3
!
2
= FGOE
(s),
(2.6)
!
(2.7)
σν st
(b) if ρ = 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P xtmν (t) ≤ νt +
t→∞
(c) if ρ < 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , then
lim P xtm̃ν (t) ≤ tν +
t→∞
∂ m̃ν
∂ν
−1
σ̃ν st
1/2
= Φ(s).
Using the theorems above, we derive the following law of large numbers for HL-PushTASEP.
Corollary 2.6 (Law of large numbers). Consider HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 with step initial
condition. Denote ν0 := (1 − b)−1 . Then,
( √
( ν(1−b)−1)2
Nνt (t)
when ν > ν0 ,
(1−b)
=
lim
t→∞
t
0
otherwise.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
9
Interactive particle systems which obey KPZ class conjecture (see, Section 2.4) form the
KPZ universality class. Models is the KPZ universality class are in a sense characterized by
the KPZ equation which is written as
∂t H(t, x) =
√
1 2
1
δ∂x H(t, x) + κ(∂x H(t, x))2 + Dξ(t, x),
2
2
for δ, κ ∈ R and D > 0 where ξ(., .) denotes the space time white noise. In a seminal work
[KPZ86], Karder, Parisi and Zhang introduced the KPZ equation as a continuum model for
the randomly growing interface which can be subjected to the local dynamics like smoothing,
lateral growth and space-time noise. Most prominent feature of the models in KPZ universality
class is that the scaling exponents of the fluctuation, the space and the time follow a ratio
1 : 2 : 3. Further, it is expected that the long time asymptotics of any model in the KPZ
universality class coincides with the corresponding statistics of the KPZ equation when initial
condition of the model corresponds with the initial condition in KPZ equation. To illustrate,
consider ASEP on Z. Initially, if all the sites in Z≤0 are occupied and the rest are left empty,
then [TW09b] shows that the height fluctuation in t1/3 scale converges to the Tracy-Widom
GUE distribution. Later, it is verified in the work of [ACQ11], [Dot10], [CDR10] and [SS10]
that under narrow wedge initial condition the height fluctuation of the KPZ equation in t1/3
scale has the same asymptotic distribution.
It is now natural to ask what are the other distributions which arise as the long time
fluctuation limits of stochastic models in KPZ universality class. There are only very few
instances where this question has been addressed. In the case of ASEP under the step Bernoulli
initial condition (sites in Z≤0 are occupied w.p ρ and other places are empty), Tracy and
Widom [TW09b] demonstrates that the limiting behavior of the height fluctuation undergoes
a phase transition. In particular, whenever ρ is close to 1, scaling exponent of the fluctuations
is still t1/3 and limiting distribution is Tracy-Widom GUE. On the contrary, when ρ nears 0,
the fluctuation converges to the Gaussian distribution under t1/2 scaling. In between those
two regime, there lies a critical point where the limiting distribution of the fluctuation is F12 .
Nevertheless, the scaling exponent of the fluctuation at the critical point remains 1/3. It is
shown in [CQ13] that the asymptotic limit of the fluctuation (in ASEP) at the critical point
corresponds to the Half-Brownian initial data of the KPZ equation.
Similar phase transition was in fact first unearthed in the work of Baik, Ben Arous and
Péché [BBAP05], where they observed a transition phenomenon (now known as BBP transition) in the limiting law of the largest eigenvalue λ1 of large spiked covariance matrices.
In a follow up paper, [Péc06] proved the same for the finite rank perturbation of the GUE
matrices. When the perturbation has rank one, then the asymptotic distribution of λ1 at criticality coincides with F12 . In the context of interacting particle systems, Barraquand [Bar15]
established the BBP transition in the case of q − T ASEP with few slower particles. More
recently, Aggarwal and Borodin [AB16] showed that the same phenomenon also holds in the
case of stochastic six vertex model when subjected to generalized Bernoulli initial data.
Our next result is on the convergence of an exponential transform of the height function
Nx (t) to a mild solution of the stochastic heat equation (SHE). The stochastic heat equation
is written as
κ√
1
DZ(t, x)ξ(t, x)
∂t Z(t, x) = δ∂x2 Z(t, x) +
2
δ
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
10
ξ(·, ·) denotes the space time white noise. Let us call Z(t, r) ∈ C([0, ∞), C(R)) a mild solution
of the SHE starting from the initial condition Zin if
Z tZ
Z
Pt−s (r − r ′ )Zin (s, r − r ′ )ξ(ds, dr ′ )
(2.8)
Ps (r − r ′ )Zin (s, r ′ )dr ′ +
Z(t, r) =
0
R
√1
2πt
R
exp(−r 2 /2t)
where Pt (r) :=
is the standard heat kernel. For existence, uniqueness, continuity and positivity of the solutions to (2.8), see [Cor12, Proposition 2.5] and [BG97], [BC95],
[Mue91]. Interestingly, the Cole - Hopf solution H(t, x) of the KPZ equation is defined by
H(t, x) = κδ log Z(t, x) whenever Z is a mild solution (see, (2.8)) of the SHE. Bertini and
Giacomin [BG97] proved that ASEP under weak asymmetric scaling and near equilibrium
initial condition converges to the Cole - Hopf solution of the KPZ equation. Later, the same
result has been shown for the narrow wedge initial data in [ACQ11]. In both of these works,
Gärtner transformation which is a discrete analogue of Cole - Hopf transform plays crucial
roles. For weakly asymmetric exclusion process with hopping range m more than 1, similar
result has first appeared in the work of Dembo and Tsai [DT16]. But, their proof breaks
down when m ≥ 4. In the following discussion, we show that under a particular weak scaling, HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 started from the step initial condition converges to the KPZ
equation.
Definition 2.7 (Gärtner Tranform & Weak Noise Scaling). Here, we turn to define explicitly
the exponential transformation (or, Gärtner transformation)
N
νǫ
when x + ⌊t/(1 − bνǫ )⌋ ∈ Z≥0
b x+⌊t/(1−bνǫ )⌋ (t)−(1−νǫ )(x+⌊t/(1−b )⌋) exp(−µǫ t)
Z(t, x) =
0
o.w
(2.9)
√
where t ∈ R+ , νǫ = ( 5 − 1)/2 and
µǫ =
(1 − νǫ ) log b
b−1 − 1
.
+
b−νǫ − 1
1 − bν ǫ
(2.10)
In the rest of our discussion, we will keep on making an abuse of notation by writing t/(1−bνǫ )
1/2
instead of ⌊t/(1 − bνǫ )⌋. Let us mention that we use a weak noise scaling b = bǫ := e−λǫ ǫ ,
−3/2
where ǫ → 0 and λǫ = νǫ
.
We extend the process Z(t, x), defined for t ∈ R+ and x ∈ Z, to a continuous process in
R+ × R by linearly interpolating in x. Let us introduce the scaled process
Zǫ (t, x) := Z(ǫ−1 t, ǫ−1 x).
(2.11)
Furthermore, we endow the space C(R+ ), and C(R+ × R) with the topology of uniform
convergence and use ⇒ to denote the weak convergence.
Definition 2.8 (Near-Equilibrium Condition). Discrete SHE Zǫ (., .) is defined to have near
equilibrium initial condition when the initial data Zǫ (0, x) satisfies the following two conditions:
kZǫ (0, x)k2k ≤ Ceǫτ |x|,
kZǫ (0, x) − Zǫ (0, x′ )k2k
v
′
≤ C ǫ|x − x′ | eǫτ (|x|+|x |) ,
(2.12)
(2.13)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
11
for some v ∈ (0, 1) and τ > 0.
Theorem 2.9. Let Z be the unique C(R+ × R)- valued solution of the SHE starting from
some initial condition ∆ and let Zǫ (t, x) ∈ C(R+ × R) as defined in (2.11) evolved from some
near equilibrium initial condition. If Zǫ (0, .) converges to Z(0, .) whenever ǫ tends to 0, then
Zǫ (., .) ⇒ Z(., .)
on C(R+ × R)
as ǫ → 0.
It can be noted that the step initial condition, i.e, xn (0) = n for n ≥ Z+ and xn (0) = −∞
for n ∈ Z− , doesn’t belong to the family of near equilibrium initial conditions in Definition 2.8. Nevertheless, the rescaled height function of HL-PushTASEP started with step
initial condition also has KPZ limit. We illustrate this further in the following theorem.
Theorem 2.10. Let Z be the unique C(R+ × R)- valued solution of the SHE starting from
delta initial measure. Consider Z̃ǫ (t, x) := ǫ−1 (1 − exp(−λǫ νǫ ))Zǫ (t, x) in C(R+ × R) evolving
from the step initial condition. Then,
Z̃ǫ (., .) ⇒ Z(., .)
on C(R+ × R),
as ǫ tends to 0.
Corollary 2.11. Let Z be as in the Theorem 2.9 so that H(t, x) := log Z(t, x) be the unique
Cole-Hopf solution of the KPZ equation starting from the delta initial measure. Then,
log Z̃ǫ (., .) ⇒ H(., .)
on C(R+ × R)
as ǫ → 0.
P
Proof of Theorem 2.10. To begin with, note that ǫ ζ∈Ξ(0) Z̃ǫ (0, ζ) = 1. Thus, Z̃ǫ (0, .)
converges to the delta initial measure as ǫ goes to 0. Below, in Proposition 2.12 which we
prove in Section 5, we show the moment estimates for Z̃ǫ at any future time point t. Thus,
using Theorem 2.9, one can complete the proof in the same way as in [ACQ11, Section 2].
Proposition 2.12. Fix any T > 0. Consider Z̃(t, x) = ǫ−1 (1 − exp(−λǫ νǫ ))Z(t, x) evolving
from the step initial condition. Then, for any t ∈ (0, ǫ−1 T ], ζ1 , ζ2 ∈ Ξ(t) and v ∈ (0, 1/2), we
have
kZ̃(t, ζ)k ≤ C min{ǫ−1/2 , (ǫt)−1/2 },
′
′ v
−(1+v)/2
kZ̃(t, ζ) − Z̃(t, ζ )k ≤ (ǫ|ζ − ζ |) (ǫt)
.
(2.14)
(2.15)
where the constant C depend only on T and v.
2.4. KPZ Scaling Theory
Here, we explain how the asymptotic fluctuation results in Theorem 2.4 confirms the KPZ
scaling theory (see, [KMHH92], [Spo14]) of the physics literature. To start with, we present
the predictions of KPZ scaling theory in the context of exclusion process following [Spo14]. For
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
12
that, one need to assume that spatially ergodic and time stationary measures of the exclusion
process on Z are precisely labelled by the density of the particles ρ, where
n
X
1
η(n).
n→∞ 2n + 1
ρ := lim
k=−n
We denote the stationary measure arising out of the density ρ by νρ . Consider the average
steady state current j(ρ) which counts the average number of particles transported from 0 to
1 in unit time where the system is distributed as νρ . Further, denote the integrated covariance
P
j∈Z Cov(η0 , ηj ) by A(ρ) where the covariance between the occupation variables η0 and ηj
is computed under the stationary measure νρ . One expects that on the microscopic scale the
rescaled particle density ̺(x, t) given as
̺(x, τ ) = lim P (there is a particle at site ⌊xt⌋ at time ⌊τ t⌋)
t→∞
satisfies the conservation equation
∂
∂
̺(x, τ ) +
j(̺(x, τ )) = 0
∂τ
∂x
when the system is started with the step initial condition, i.e,
1 x≥0
̺(x, 0) =
0 x < 0.
(2.16)
(2.17)
This result can also be phrased as a hydrodynamic limit theory. For any exclusion process,
consider the height function h(., .) : Z × R+ → Z given by
Pj
if j > 0
Nt + i=1 ηt (j)
h(j, t) :=
N
if j = 0
P t
Nt − −j
η
(−i)
if
j < 0.
i=1 t
Then, using the arguments in [Spo91, Part II, Section 3.3], one can prove that (2.16) implies
the following law of large numbers
h(νt, t)
= φ(ν)
t→∞
t
lim
where the limit shape φ(.) is given by
φ(y) = sup {yρ − j(ρ)}.
ρ∈[0,1]
Furthermore, Let us denote λ(ρ) = −j ′′ (ρ). Under such parametrization, we have the following
KPZ class conjecture.
KPZ Class Conjecture:([Spo14]) Let y be such that φ is twice differentiable at y with
φ′′ 6= 0. Set ρ0 = φ′ (y). If 0 ≤ ρ0 < 1, A(ρ0 ) < ∞ and λ(ρ0 ) 6= 0, then under the step initial
condition in (2.17), one has
!
tφ(y) − h(⌊yt⌋, t)
≤ s = FGU E (s).
lim P
t→∞
(− 12 λA2 )1/3 t1/3
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
13
In the case when φ(y) is linear or cusp like, then KPZ conjecture doesn’t hold. It is likely that
the scaling of the fluctuations would be different in those cases. Historically, the conjecture on
the scaling exponent t1/3 of the fluctuation above dates back to the the work [KPZ86]. To that
end, the magnitude of the fluctuation was obtained in [KMHH92] and the limit distribution
was first surfaced in [Joh00].
Lemma 2.13. Fix 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1. Consider the HL-PushTASEP model on Z≥0 . Further, assume
that a jet of particles is entering into the region Z≥0 through 0 at rate τ where τ := ρ(1 −
ρ)−1 (1 − b)−1 . Then, the product Bernoulli measure νρ will be the invariant measure for the
HL-PushTASEP model. In particular, each of the occupation variables {ηt (x)|x ∈ Z≥0 } follows
Ber(ρ) independent of others.
Proof. Assume, at time t = 0, each site on Z+ is occupied by at most one particle with
probability ρ independently of others. First, we show νρ (ηt (0) = 1) = ρ for any t ≥ 0. Note
that influx rate of particles at site x = 0 is equal to τ . Then, rate at which particle leaves site
0 is given by χ1 + χ2 + χ3
χ1 := τ ρ,
χ2 := τ b(1 − ρ),
and ,
χ3 := ρ.
To begin with, consider the case when initially the site 0 was occupied. Probability of this
event is ρ. In such scenario, χ1 captures the rate of out flux of any particle to the right from
the site 0 after a particle arrives there. On the contrary, probability that the site 0 was initially
unoccupied is 1 − ρ. Thus, if a particle arrives when the site 0 is empty, it moves further one
step towards the right with probability b. Henceforth, the value of χ2 synchronizes perfectly
with the rate of outflux from the site 0 whenever initially it was unoccupied. Finally, the
particle which was initially at the site 0 jumps to the right at rate 1 and this contribution
has added up in the total rate out flux through χ3 . Due to the specific choice of τ , we get
τ = χ1 + χ2 + χ3 . Consequently, the rate of in flux matches with the rate of out flux of the
particles from the site 0. Therefore, probability that the site 0 is occupied doesn’t change over
time. More importantly, the rate at which particles will move into the site 1 is also equal to
τ . This further implies P(ηt (1) = 1) = ρ for any t ≥ 0. Using induction, one can now prove
that the occupation variable ηt (x) for any x ∈ Z+ and t ≥ 0 follows Ber(ρ). In fact, using
similar argument, one can show that at any time t, the rate of influx of the particles into any
interval [x1 , x2 ] of finite length over Z+ is equal to the rate at which the particles will come
out of the interval [x1 , x2 ].
Now, we turn to prove the independence of any two occupation variables ηt (x1 ) and ηt (x2 )
for x1 < x2 ∈ Z+ . Let us consider (ǫx1 , ǫx1 +1 , . . . , ǫx2 ) ∈ {0, 1}x2 −x1 +1 . Further, denote
ηt (a)
if ǫa = 1,
ǫa
ηt (a) :=
1 − ηt (a)
if ǫa = 0.
To this end, one can note that
E
x2
Y
a=x1
!
ηtǫa (a)
=E
x2
Y
a=x1
!
η0ǫa (a)
for any choice of the variables (ǫx1 , ǫx1 +1 , . . . , ǫx2 ) in the space {0, 1}x2 −x1 +1 . This is again
due to the principle of conservation of mass, i.e, the influx rate into the interval [x1 , x2 ] is
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
14
same as the rate of out flux of the particles. Thus, we get
xY
2 −1
X
E(ηt (x1 )ηt (x2 )) = E
ηtǫa (a)
ηt (x1 )ηt (x2 )
= E
ǫx1 +1 ,...,ǫx2 −1
a=x1 +1
X
xY
2 −1
η0 (x1 )η0 (x2 )
ǫx1 +1 ,...,ǫx2 −1
a=x1 +1
η0ǫa (a) = E (η0 (x1 )η0 (x2 )) = ρ2 .
To that effect, covariance of ηt (x1 ) and ηt (x2 ) becomes 0. As these are Bernoulli random
variables, thus the independence is proved.
Now, we turn to showing how Theorem 2.4 verifies the KPZ class conjecture in the context
of HL-PushTASEP. In Lemma 2.13, it is proved that all the stationary translation invariant
measure of HL-PushTASEP are given by product measure νρ where each site follows Ber(ρ)
distribution. Further, it has been also shown that under stationary measure νρ steady state
current will be ρ(1 − ρ)−1 (1 − b)−1 . To that effect, we have
ρ
φ(y) = sup ρy −
.
(2.18)
(1 − ρ)(1 − b)
ρ∈[0,1]
If y(1 − b) > 1, then the function g(ρ) = yρ − ρ(1 − ρ)−1 (1 − b)−1 is maximized when
ρ = 1 − (y(1 − b))−1/2 . In this scenario, we get
φ(y) =
p
2
y(1 − b) − 1
(1 − b)
.
One can further derive that the equilibrium density ρ corresponding to y is 1 − (y(1 − b))−1/2 .
To this end, we have λ(ρ) = −j ′′ (ρ) = −2y 3/2 b(1 − b)1/2 . Further, stationarity of the product
Bernoulli measure implies A(ρ) = ρ(1 − ρ) = (y(1 − b))−1/2 (1 − (y(1 − b))−1/2 ). Finally, it can
be noted that
2/3
p
1/3
1/3
y(1
−
b)
−
1
b
1
= σy .
=
− λ(ρ)A2 (ρ)
2
y 1/6 (1 − b)1/2
Thus, KPZ class conjecture implies that the height function N⌊yt⌋ (t) of HL-PushTASEP
started from the step initial condition has a limit shape given by tφ(y) in (2.18) and more importantly, the fluctuation around the limit shape under the scaling of (−2−1 λA2 t)1/3 converges
to the Tracy-Widom GUE distribution. As one can see, Theorem 2.4 verifies the conjecture
and at the same time, identifies the form of the limit shape and the correct scaling of the
fluctuation.
3. Transition Matrix & Laplace Transform
For proving the asymptotic results, we need to have concrete knowledge on the distribution
of the positions of the particles at any fixed time. In most of the cases of interactive particle
systems (see, [TW11] for ASEP, [BCG16] for the stochastic six vertex model), transition
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
15
matrices for the underlying Markov processes play important roles towards that goal. In
particular, transition matrices assists in getting suitable Fredholm determinant formulas for
the Laplace transforms of some of the important observables like in the case of several quantum
integrable interacting particle systems (see, [BC14] for a survey). In the following subsections,
we elaborate on the derivation of the transition matrix of the HL-PushTASEP and its use to
proclaim the formulas for the Laplace transforms.
3.1. Transition Matrix & Transition Probabilities
Primary goal of this section is to compute the transition matrix in the case of finite particle
configurations of the HL-PushTASEP. Later in this section, we use the transition matrix
to specialize on the transition probabilities of a single particle in a system of finite particle
configuration. At first, fix some positive integer N . For any A ⊆ X N define
X (N )
P~x (A; t) :=
Tt (~x → ~y )
~
x∈A
(N )
where Tt (~x → ~y ) denotes the probability of transition to ~y ∈ X N from ~x ∈ X N . In the
(N )
following proposition, we derive the eigenfunctions of the transfer matrix Tt .
Proposition 3.1. For N > 0, fix N small complex numbers z1 , z2 , . . . , zN such that |bzi | < 1
for 1 ≤ i ≤ N and 1 − (2 + b)zj + bzi zj 6= 0 for all 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ N . Fix a permutation
σ ∈ S(N ). Define,
Y 1 − (1 + b)zσ(i) + bzσ(i) zσ(j)
Aσ = (−1)σ
.
1 − (1 + b)zi + bzi zj
i<j
Then the function
Φ(x1 , x2 , . . . , xN ; z1 , z2 , . . . , zN ) =
X
σ∈S(n)
Aσ
N
Y
xi
zσ(i)
i=1
is an eigenfunction of the transfer matrix T (N ) , i.e
X
y ∈X N
~
(N )
Tt (~x
→ ~y )Φ(~y ; z1 , z2 , . . . , zn ) = exp
N
X
i=1
1 − zi
−t
1 − bzi
!
Φ(~y ; z1 , z2 , . . . , zn ). (3.1)
As pointed out in Section 2.2, HL-PushTASEP can be considered as a continuum version of
the stochastic six vertex model for which the transfer matrix has been worked in full details in
the past. See [Lie67], [Nol92] for the derivation in the case of the stochastic six vertex model
under periodic boundary condition and [BCG16, Theorem 3.4] for the derivation on Z. Let
us note that one can derive the relation (3.1) by taking appropriate limit (see, (2.1)) of the
transfer matrix of stochastic six vertex model in [BCG16, Eq.16]. Although, one has to be
careful because the limit might not exist. For completeness, we present a self contained proof
of the result in Appendix B.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
16
Proposition 3.2. For N > 0, fix N small complex numbers z1 , z2 , . . . , zN such that |bzi | < 1
for 1 ≤ i ≤ N and 1 − (2 + b)zj + bzi zj 6= 0 for all 1 ≤ i 6= j ≤ N . For any permutation
σ ∈ S(N ), define
Y 1 − (1 + b)zσ(j) + bzσ(i) zσ(j)
A′σ = (−1)σ
1 − (1 + b)zj + bzi zj
i<j
and
A′′σ = (−1)σ
Y 1 − (1 + b−1 )zσ(i) + b−1 zσ(i) zσ(j)
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj
i<j
.
Let us assume ~x = (x1 , . . . , xN ) and ~y = (y1 , . . . , yN ). Denote the transition matrix for N
(N )
particles in time t by Tt . Then, we have
(N )
Tt (~x
→ ~y) =
Z
X
(Cr )N σ∈S(N )
A′σ
n
Y
−xi yi −1
zσ(i)
zi
exp
xi
zσ(i)
zi−yi −1 exp
i=1
1 − zi
−t
1 − bzi
dz1 . . . dzN
(3.2)
(3.3)
and
(N )
Tt (~x
→ ~y ) =
Z
X
(CR )N σ∈S(N )
A′′σ
n
Y
i=1
1 − zi−1
−t
1 − bzi−1
dz1 . . . dzN
where Cr is small positively oriented circle leaving all the singularities outside and CR is large
positively oriented circle containing all the singularities inside.
Proof. Using the relation (3.1), both the formulas in (3.2) and (3.3) can be proved in the
same way as in [BCG16, Theorem 3.6] (see also [TW11, Section II.4.b]). We omit here further
details of the proof.
Theorem 3.3. Fix an integer N > 0 and a positive real number t. Let us assume that we
have N particles which are initially at the position ~y = (y1 , y2 , . . . , yN ) ∈ X N evolve according
the dynamics of HL-PushTASEP. Then, for 1 ≤ m ≤ N , we have
X X
k−1
bκ(S,Z>0 )−mk−k(k−1)/2
P~y (xm = x; t) = (−1)m−1 bm(m−1)/2
m−1 b
m≤k≤N |S|=k
I
I
Y
zj − zi
1
.
.
.
×
(2πi)k
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj
i,j∈S,i<j
Q
Y
1 − i∈S zi
1 − zi−1
x−yi −1
dzi
zi
exp −t
×Q
1 − bzi−1
i∈S (1 − zi ) i∈S
where the summation goes over S ⊂ {1, 2, . . . , N } of size k, κ(S, Z>0 ) is the sum of the
elements in S, and contours are positively oriented large circles of equal radius which contains
all the singularities.
Proof. This result is in the same spirit of [BCG16, Theorem 4.9] where they found out explicitly the probability of the similar event in the case of the stochastic six vertex model.
They closely followed the techniques used in [TW08, Section 6] in the context of N-particle
ASEP. It begins with the realization that P(xm (t) = x; 1, b) is the sum of the probabilities
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
17
(N )
Tt (~y → ~x) over all ~x = (x1 , x2 , . . . , xN ) ∈ X N such that −∞ < x1 < x2 < . . . < xm−1 <
xm = x and x < xm+1 < . . . < xN < ∞. Now, one have to make use of the formulas for
(N )
Tt (~y → ~x) mentioned in (3.2) and (3.3). Notice that for the sum over all ~x ∈ X N such that
−∞ < x1 < x2 < . . . < xm−1 < xm = x contours of integration is Cr and for other part of
the sum contours will be CR . For brevity, we are skipping here the details of the proof.
3.2. Moments Formulas
In this subsection, we aim to present a series of results on moments of the height function
of HL-PushTASEP. One can see [BCG16, Section 4.4] for similar results in the case of the
stochastic six vertex model. In Section 4, these formulas turns out to be instrumental for
obtaining the asymptotics.
For a function f : X N → R, let E~y (f ; t) represent the expectation of f at time t, i.e
X (N )
E~y (f ; t) =
Tt (~y → ~x).
~
x∈X N
Also, let us introduce (a; q)k and (a; q)∞ by defining
(a; q)k :=
k
Y
(1 − aq j−1 ) and
(a; q)k :=
j=1
∞
Y
(1 − aq j−1 ).
j=1
Furthermore, there is a q - analogue of binomials defined as follows
(q N −k+1 ; q)k
n
(1 − q N )(1 − q N −1 ) . . . (1 − q N −k+1 )
=
.
:=
(1 − q)(1 − q 2 ) . . . (1 − q k )
(q; q)k
k q
In both of the above definitions, we assume k is a non-negative integers.
Proposition 3.4. Consider HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 . Fix a positive real number t. Assume
that the process has been started from the step Bernoulli initial condition with parameter ρ.
Denote the initial data by stepb which belongs to X N . Then for L = 0, 1, 2, . . . and any positive
integer x, we have
!
L
k−2
Y
X
b−k(k−1)/2+L−k ρk
(1 − b1−k+L bi )
Estepb (bLNx ; t) = 1 + (b−L − 1)
(b−1 ; b−1 )k
I
Ik=1 Yi=1
zj − zi
1
×
...
k
(2πi)
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj
1≤i<j≤k
×
k
Y
i=1
(ρ + (1 −
zix (b−1 − 1)
ρ)b−1 − zi b−1 )(1
1 − zi−1
exp −t
− zi )
1 − bzi−1
dzi
(3.4)
where the contours of integrations are largely oriented circles with equal radius and contain
all the singularities of the integrand.
Proof. One can find a similar result in [BCG16, Proposition 4.11] in the case of stochastic six
vertex model with step initial data. For the sake of clarity, we present an independent proof
in C.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
18
Proposition 3.5. Consider HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 . Fix a positive number t. As usual
stepb ∈ X N denotes the step Bernoulli initial condition with parameter ρ. Then for L =
0, 1, 2, . . . and for any integer x, we have
Estepb (b
LNx
bL(L−1)/2
; t) =
(2πi)L
I
x
I Y
L
tui
dui
uA − uB Y
1 + ui
exp
,
...
−1
uA − buB
b
1 + ui b
ui (1 − αui b−1 )
A<B
i=1
where the positively oriented contour for uA includes 0, −b, but does not include bρ(1 − ρ)−1
or {buB }B>A . Note that α := (1 − ρ)ρ−1 .
Proof. To prove this result, one needs to substitute zi = (1 + ui )/(1 + ui b−1 ) into the formula
(3.4). Consequently, one can notice
ui − uj
zj − zi
=
−1
−1
1 − (1 + b )zi + b zi zj
ui − buj
,
dui
ρ(b−1 − 1)dzi
=
−1
−1
(ρ + (1 − ρ)b − zi b )(1 − zi )
ui (1 − αui b−1 )
where α = (1 − ρ)/ρ. Let us mention that a similar result is proved in the case of stochastic
six vertex model in [BCG16, Theorem 4.12]. See [BCS14, Theorem 4.20] for a different proof
in the case of ASEP. Rest of the calculation after the substitution can be completed in the
same way as in [BCG16, Theorem 4.12]. We omit any further details from here.
3.3. Fredholm Determinant Formula
In this section, we discuss the representation of the moment formulas of HL-PushTASEP in
terms of Fredholm determinant. In the last ten years, a large number of works had been put
forward in the literature of KPZ universality class and Fredholm determinant formulas play a
crucial role in reaching out such results. For similar exposition in stochastic six vertex model,
see [BCG16, Section 4.5]. See [BC14, Section 3.2] and [BCS14, Section 3 and 5] for corresponding formulas in the case of q-Whittaker process and q-TASEP. Moreover, various other
instances can be found in the works like [CP16, Theorem 4.2], [BC16, Section 3.3], [BCF14].
Definition and some of the useful properties of the Fredholm determinants are discussed in
Appendix A.
Definition 3.6. Here, we define the contours DR,d,δ and DR,d,δ;κ . Let us fix positive numbers
R, δ, d such that d, δ < 1. Then the contour DR,d,δ is composed of five linear sections:
DR,d,δ := (R − i∞, R − id] ∪ [R − id, δ − id] ∪ [δ − id, δ + id] ∪ [δ + id, R + id] ∪ [R + id, R + i∞).
Let κ be an integer which is greater than R. Denote two points at which circle of radius κ + δ
and centre at 0 crosses (R − i∞, R − id] and (R − i∞, R − id] by ζ and ζ ′ . Let us call that
minor arc joining ξκ and ξκ′ to be Iκ . Then DR,δ,d;κ is defined to be a positively oriented closed
contour formed by the union
DR,d,δ := (ξκ , R − id] ∪ [R − id, δ − id] ∪ [δ − id, δ + id] ∪ [δ + id, R + id] ∪ [R + id, ξκ′ ) ∪ Iκ .
See Figure 3 for details.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
19
R + i∞
ζ
δ + id
R + id
κ
1
R − id
δ − id
ζ′
R − i∞
Fig 3: Plot of the contour DR,d,δ and DR,d,δ;κ .
Theorem 3.7. Consider HL-PushTASEP on Z≥0 . Fix a positive number t. Let stepb ∈ WN
stands for the step Bernoulli initial data with parameter ρ. Let Cr be a positively oriented
circle centered at some negative real number r such that Cr include 0 and −b, but does not
contain bα−1 . Furthermore, Cr does not intersect with bCr , i.e, bCr is contained in the interior
of Cr . Then, there exist a sufficiently large real number R > 1, and sufficiently small real
numbers δ, d < 1 such that for all ζ ∈ C\R≥0 , we have
(A)
inf
′
w,w ∈Cr
κ∈(2R,∞)∩Z
s∈DR,d,δ;κ
|bs w − w′ | > 0,
(B)
sup
w∈Cr
κ∈(2R,∞)∩Z
s∈DR,d,δ;κ
g(w)
< ∞.
g(bs w)
Moreover, for any ζ ∈ C\R≥0 , we have
1
b
,
Estepb
;
t
=
det
I
+
K
ζ
(ζbNx ; b)∞
L2 (Cr )
(3.5)
(3.6)
where the kernel Kζb is given by
Kζb (w, w′ )
1
=
2πi
Z
DR,d,δ
g(w; 1, b, x, t)
ds
(−ζ)s
·
· s
,
s
sin(πs) g(b w; 1, b, x, t) b w − w′
(3.7)
integration contour DR,d,δ is oriented from bottom to top and
x
1
tz
1
g(z; 1, b, x, t) =
exp
.
1 + zb−1
b(1 − b) (αb−1 z; b)∞
where α = ρ−1 (1 − ρ).
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
20
Proof. We first prove the existence of R, d and δ such that (A) and (B) in (3.5) are satisfied.
Note that Cr doesn’t contain 0 on it and it is a bounded closed set in C, thus, compact.
Hence, |w′ w−1 | has a lower bound whenever w, w′ ∈ Cr . Let us choose R in such a way
that bR becomes less than the lower bound of |w′ w−1 |. This ensures that the infimum of
|bs w − w′ | is bounded away from 0 along (ξk , R − id] ∪ [R + id, ξk′ ) ∪ Ik . Further, note that
bCr never touches Cr . Thereafter, using boundedness of Cr , we can found δ sufficiently close
to 1 such that bs Cr remains disjoint from Cr for all s ∈ [δ − id, δ + id]. However, it implies
somewhat much stronger statement. On can say further that bs Cr escapes from Cr for all
s ∈ [δ − id, R − id] ∪ [δ + id, R + id]. Hence, condition (A) in (3.5) is satisfied. Furthermore,
one can see
g(w)
1 + bs−1 w
tw(1 − bs ) (αbs−1 w; b)∞
=
.
exp
g(bs w)
1 + b−1 w
b(1 − b)
(αb−1 w; b)∞
Choice of Cr and R, δ, d implies immediately that condition (B) in (3.5) is also met. Now, we
turn into proving (3.6). Techniques for similar determinantal formula is quite well known by
now, thanks to the vast literature mentioned above. We will sketch here the basic outline of
such technique. For brevity, we skip major portion of details in the proof. We first look into
the expansion of 1/(ζbNx ; b)∞ . Using [AAR99, Corollary 10.2.2 a], one can say
∞
X
ζ L bLNx
1
=
(ζbNx ; b)∞
(b; b)L
L=0
where (b; b)L =
QL
i=1 (1
− b · bi−1 ). Recall that in Lemma 3.5, we have
bL(L−1)/2
µL := Estepb (bLNx ; t) =
(2πi)L
where
f (u) := exp
tu
b
I
...
I Y
L
uA − uB Y f (ui )
dui ,
uA − buB
ui
A<B
1+u
1 + ub−1
x
i=1
1
1 − αub−1
and the integration contours do include 0, −b inside, but, not α−1 b. Moreover, one can notice
that f doesn’t have a pole in an open neighborhood of the line joining 0 P
and −b. Let us denote
any partition λ = (λ1 , λ2 , . . .) of any positive integer k by λ ⊢ k where ∞
i=1 λi = k. Further,
denote number of positive λi ’s in λ by l(λ). Thus, using [BCF14, Proposition 5.2], one can
conclude that
X
1
1
µL = (b; b)L
m1 !m2 ! . . . (2πi)l(λ)
λ⊢L
1m1 2m2 ...
×
Z
...
C
Z
C
det
−1
bλi wi − wj
l(λ) l(λ)
Y
f (wj )f (bwj ) . . . f (bλj −1 wj )dwj
i,j=1 j=1
where the contour C also avoids 0, −b and doesn’t intersect with bn C for any n ∈ N. To this
end, one can conform the contour C to the the circle Cr without passing any singularity of
the integrand. Further, using the form of the function g, it is easy to see
g(wj ; 1, b, x, t)
= f (wj )f (bwj ) . . . f (bλj −1 wj ).
g(bλj wj ; 1, b, x, t)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
21
Consequently, we can write
∞
∞
X
X
ζ L µL
=
(b; b)L
L=0
L=0
X
λ⊢L
1m1 2m2 ...
1
ζL
m1 !m2 ! . . . (2πi)l(λ)
×
Z
Cr
...
Z
det
Cr
(3.8)
g(wj ; 1, b, x, t)
−1
λ
i
b wi − wj g(bλj wj ; 1, b, x, t)
l(λ) l(λ)
Y
dwj .
i,j=1 j=1
At this point, we will make an interchange of two summations above. Let us fix a positive
integer k and first sum over all partitions λ which has size k, i.e l(λ) = k. Interchange of
summations is justified by the linearity of the integrals. Furthermore, one can write ζ L =
ζ λ1 +...+λl(λ) . To that effect, the right side of (3.8) simplifies to
!k
Z
Z
∞
k
∞
X
Y
X
g(wj ; 1, b, x, t)
(−ζ)s
1
det
.
.
.
dwj .
k!(2πi)k C
bL wi − wj g(bL wj ; 1, b, x, t)
C
k=0
i,j=1 j=1
L=1
Now, it remains to show that
∞
X
L=1
g(wj ; 1, b, x, t)
(−ζ)s
1
=
L
L
b wi − wj g(b wj ; 1, b, x, t)
2πi
Z
DR,d,δ
(−ζ)s
g(w; 1, b, x, t)
ds
·
· s
. (3.9)
s
sin(πs) g(b w; 1, b, x, t) b w − w′
Note that the function 1/ sin(πs) decays exponentially as |s| → ∞ along the segments (R −
i∞, R − id] and [R + id, R + i∞). On the flip side, (bs w − w′ )−1 g(w)/g(bs w) is uniformly
bounded on DR,d,δ,κ for all k ≤ R. Thus, integrand in (3.9) goes to zero at at both ends of
the line Re(z) = R. Instead of integrating over DR,d,δ , if we choose to integrate over DR,d,δ;κ ,
then using residue theorem, we obtain
Z
1
(−ζ)s
g(w; 1, b, x, t)
ds
·
· s
(3.10)
s
2πi DR,d,δ;κ sin(πs) g(b w; 1, b, x, t) b w − w′
κ
X
g(w; 1, b, x, t)
1
(−ζ)s
·
·
.
Ress=L
=
sin(πs) g(bs w; 1, b, x, t) bs w − w′
L=1
Moreover, if we let κ grows to infinity, then the integral along the semi-circular arc Iκ tends
0 thanks again to the exponential growth of sin(πs). Thus, integral over DR,d,δ;κ converges to
the right side in (3.9) whereas when κ → ∞, the right side in (3.10) recovers the other side
of the equality in (3.9). This completes the proof.
4. Asymptotics
Main aim of this section is to prove the Theorem 2.4 and Theorem 2.5. Asymptotic analysis
that we present here adapts closely to the similar expositions in [BCG16, Section 5]. The crux
of the proof of Theorem 2.4 essentially is governed by the the steepest descent analysis of the
kernel of the Fredholm determinant in Theorem 3.7. In the following propositions, large time
limit of the Fredholm determinant will be provided. We conclude the proof of Theorem 2.4
after Lemma 4.2 modulo the proof of these propositions.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
22
Proposition 4.1. Recall the definition of the contour Cr from Theorem 3.7. Adopt the notations used in Theorem 2.4.
1/3
(a) Assume ρ > 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 . Set x(t) = ⌊νt⌋ and ζt = −b−mν t+sσν t
lim det 1 + Kζbt 2
= FGU E (s).
t→∞
. Then, we have
(4.1)
L (Cr )
(b) Let ρ = 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 . For the same choices of x(t) and ζt as above, we have
b
2
lim det 1 + Kζt 2
= FGOE
(s).
t→∞
L (Cr )
′
1/3
(c) In the case when ρ < 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , set x(t) = ⌊ν ′ t⌋ and ζt = −b−mν t+sσ νt
one can get
lim det 1 + Kζbt 2
= Φ(s).
t→∞
L (Cr )
. Then,
(4.2)
Lemma 4.2. ([BC14, Lemma 4.1.39]) Consider a set of functions {ft }t≥0 mapping R → [0, 1]
such that for each t, ft (x) is strictly decreasing in x with a limit of 1 at x = −∞ and 0 at
x = ∞ and for each δ > 0, on R\[−δ, δ], ft converges uniformly to 1(x ≤ 0). Define the
r-shift of ft as fnr (x) = fn (x − r). Consider a set of random variables Xt indexed by t ∈ R+
such that for each r ∈ R,
t→∞
E[ftr (Xt )] −→ p(r)
and assume that p(r) is a continuous probability distribution. Then Xt weakly converges in
distribution to a random variable X which is distributed according to P(X ≤ r) = p(r).
Proof of Theorem 2.4. For part (a) and (b) of Theorem 2.4, we use Lemma 4.2 with
the functions
1
, t ∈ R+ .
ft (z) :=
1/3 z
−t
(−b
; b)∞
Note that ft (z) is a monotonously decreasing function of the real argument of z, yielding
limt→∞ ft (z) = 0 if z > 0 and limt→−∞ ft (Z) = 1 if z ≤ 0. Set Xt = σν−1 t−1/3 (mν t − Nνt (t)).
Thus, for any s ∈ R, we can write
fts (Xt ) =
1
(ζt bNνt (t) ; b)∞
1/3
where ζt = b−mν t+sσν t . To this end, part (a) and (b) of Proposition 4.1 shows that the limit
of E (fts (Xt )) are indeed probability distribution function. Hence, this proves part (a) and (b)
of Theorem 2.4. For part (c), we replace ft by gt which is defined as
gt (z) :=
1
(−b
−t1/2 z
; b)∞
, t ∈ R+ .
1/3
Setting Xt = (σ̃ν )−1 t−1/2 (m̃ν t − Nνt (t)) and ζt = b−mν t+sσ̃ν t , one can note gts (Xt ) =
(ζt bNνt (t) ; b)−1
∞ . Therefore, rest of the proof follows from the part (c) of Proposition 4.1.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
23
Proof of Proposition 4.1 We start with some necessary pre-processing of the kernel
Kζbt . Notice that in the statements of all three parts of Proposition 4.1, ζt is substituted
with −bβ and x is substituted with ⌊νt⌋ where β is some function of the time variable t and
ν > (1 − b)−1 . Under these substitutions, the form of the kernel Kζbt effectively reduces to
1
2i
Kζbt (w, w′ ) =
Z
DR,d,δ
g(w; 1, b, νt, t)
dh
bhβ
·
·
sin(πh) g(bh w; 1, b, νt, t) bh w − w′
where
the contour
ofthe integration is oriented from the bottom to top and g(z; 1, b, x, t) =
x
1
t
exp b(1−b) (αb−1 z; b)−1
∞ . Like in [BCG16], the particular form of the integrand in
1+z/b
(3.7) calls for the substitution bh w = v. Unfortunately, the latter substitution is not injective.
Thus, to study how this effect the integral, we have to divide the contour DR,d,δ into countably
many parts which have one-to-one images under the above substitution. For instance, each of
the linear sections Il := [R + i(d + 2π log(b)−1 l), R + i(d + 2π(log(b))−1 (l + 1))] of the contour
of h for l ∈ Z\g{−1} maps to the same image. Furthermore, other parts of DR,d,δ , i.e., the
union
[R − i(d + 2π log(b)−1 ), R − id] ∪ [R − id, δ − id] ∪ [δ − id, δ + id] ∪ [δ + id, R + id]
maps to a closed contour DR,d,δ,w composed of four different portions. For completeness, we
present here a formal definition of the contour DR,d,δ,w .
Definition 4.3. For each w, define a contour DR,d,δ,w as the union
T1 ∪ T2 ∪ T3 ∪ T4 .
We describe Ti ’s successively. To begin with, T1 is a major arc of a small circle around origin
with radius bR |w|. To be exact, T1 is the image of the segment [R − i(d + 2π log(b)−1 ), R − id]
under the map h 7→ bh w. Similarly, T2 , image of [δ − id, δ + id], is a minor arc of a larger
circle of radius bδ |w|. Apparently, these two arcs of two different circle are connected by two
linear segments T2 and T3 . Precisely, T2 connects bR−id w to bδ−id w and T3 connects bδ+id w
to bR+id w. It is evident from the definition of T2 (T3 ) that it is the image of [R − id, δ − id]
([δ + id, R + id]) under the above map. Due to the bottom-to-top orientation of the contour
DR,d,δ in Theorem 3.7, DR,d,δ,w will be anti clockwise oriented. See Figure 4 for further details.
For notational convenience, let us denote the circle of radius s with center at origin in the
complex plane C by Cs (note the difference from Cr ). In fact, CbR |w| is the image of each linear
segments Il for l ∈ Z\{−1}. Thus, one can write
Kζbt (w, w′ )
Z
∞
X
1
=
2i C R
k=−∞
k6=−1
1
+
2i
Z
DR,d,δ,w
b
(v/w)β
|w|
sin
π
log(b) (log(v/w))
(v/w)β
+ 2πik
·
dv
g(w; 1, b, νt, t)
·
g(v; 1, b, νt, t) v log(b)(v − w′ )
dv
g(w; 1, b, νt, t)
·
·
. (4.3)
π
g(v; 1, b, νt, t) v log(b)(v − w′ )
(log(v/w)) − 2πi
sin log(b)
At this point, we would make a surgery over the contour DR,d,w,k . Let us connect a minor arc
−1
from bR−id w to bR−i(d+2π log(b) ) w in the circle CbR |w| (major arc being T1 ) and call it T1′ . We
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
T4
T3
24
wbh
R + id
T2
R − id
T1
R − i(d + 2π log(b)−1 )
Fig 4: Figure on the right side indicates the section of the contour DR,d,δ which under the
map h 7→ wbh pertains to the contour T1 ∪ T2 ∪ T3 ∪ T4 shown in the left.
use −T1′ to indicate clockwise orientation. Therefore, D̃R,d,w,k := T2 ∪ T3 ∪ T4 ∪ −T1′ denotes a
closed contour oriented anti clockwise. Using the properties of the contour integration, it can
be said that integral over DR,d,w,k in (4.3) is a sum of the integrals over D̃R,d,w,k and CbR |w| .
Further, notice that there is no pole of the integrand sitting inside the contour D̃R,d,w,k for
any w ∈ Cr (see, Theorem 3.7 for w) thanks to the conditions (A) and (B) in (3.5). Thus,
integral over D̃R,d,w,k vanishes. To this effect, one can write
Kζbt (w, w′ )
Z
∞
X
1
=
2i C R
k=−∞
b
(v/w)β
|w|
sin
π
log(b) (log(v/w))
+ 2πik
·
dv
g(w; 1, b, νt, t)
·
.
g(v; 1, b, νt, t) v log(b)(v − w′ )
(4.4)
4.1. Case ρ > 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , Tracy-Widom Fluctuations (GUE).
Fix ν > (1 − b)−1 . Set β = −mν t + sσν t1/3 . Define a function Λ as
Λ(z) =
z
− ν log(1 + z/b) + mν log(z).
b(1 − b)
(4.5)
Thus, one can further simplify (4.4) into
Kζbt (w, w′ )
∞ Z
X
1
=
2i log(b)
C R
k=−∞
b
exp(t(Λ(w) − Λ(v)) + t1/3 sσν (log(v) − log(w)))dv
π
′ ) sin
(log(v/w))
+
2πik
(v
−
w
|w|
log(b)
×
dv
(αb−1 v; b)∞
× .
−1
(αb w; b)∞
v
(4.6)
In a nutshell, the asymptotic behavior of the kernel is governed by the variations of the real
part of Λ. In what follows, we exhibit the steepest descent contours, which helps in localizing
the main contribution in a neighborhood of a critical point of Re(Λ). Thereafter, using Taylor
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
25
expansion of the arguments of the exponential inside the kernel in (4.6) and appropriate
estimates for the kernel in the region away from the critical points, we prove the limit. To
this end, notice that
νb−1
mν
1
−
+
.
Λ′ (z) =
b(1 − b) 1 + z/b
z
√
( ν(1−b)−1)2
Plugging mν =
, we get
1−b
Λ′ (z) =
(z − ̺)2
,
b2 (1 − b)(1 + ̺/b)̺
p
where ̺ = b( ν(1 − b) − 1). This shows that Λ′ has an unique double critical point at ̺. In
particular, in a neighborhood of ̺, we have
Λ(z) = Λ(̺) +
σν
̺
3
(z − ̺)3 + R((z − ̺))
where (z − ̺)−3 R((z − ̺)) → 0 when z → ̺. thanks to fact that
σν
̺
3
p
−1
ν(1 − b) − 1 (1 − b)3/2 ν 1/2
= b2
= Λ′′′ (̺).
Now, we would like to deform the contours of v and w suitably so that Re(Λ(w) − λ(v)) < −c
for some c > 0 whenever v and w are away from the critical point ̺. In the following lemma,
we describe the level curves of Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺)) in details. We call a closed contour (let’s
say C) star shaped if for any φ ∈ [0, 2π), there exists exactly one point z ∈ C such that
Arg(z) = φ.
Lemma 4.4. There are exactly three level curves L1 , L2 and L3 of Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺)) in
the complex plane C satisfying the following properties:
(a) both L1 and L2 are simple closed contours meeting with L3 at the point ̺. Further, L1
(L2 ) cuts the negative half of the real line at some point d1 (d2 ) in the interval (−b, 0)
((−∞, −b)),
(b) L3 resides in the right half of the complex plane, escapes to infinity as |z| → ∞,
(c) both L1 and L2 are star shaped,
(d) L1 \{̺} is completely contained inside the interior of the region enclosed by L2 . Furthermore, L3 meet the contours L1 and L2 at no other point point except ̺,
(e) L1 (L2 ) leaves the x-axis at an angle 5π/6 (π/2) from the point ̺ and meets again at
−5π/6 (−π/2). Moreover, upper half (lower half ) of the contour L3 leaves the real line
from ̺ at an angle π/6 (−5π/6).
Proof. We closely adapt here the proofs of the related results in the context of stochastic six
vertex model (see, [BCG16, Section 5.1]).
(a) It can be observed in (4.5) that Λ(z) has singularities at 0 and −b on R. Thus, there
are at least two level curves L1 and L2 of Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺)) which originate from the
point ̺ and in the way back to their origin, they cut R− at some points d1 ∈ (−b, 0) and
d2 ∈ (−∞, −b) respectively.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
26
(b) Tracing the changes in sign of Re(Λ(z)) − Re(Λ(̺)) in Figure 5, one can infer that outside
L2 , there should be a region where Re(Λ(z)) − Re(Λ(̺)) < 0. But, if we take a large circle
CM of radius M in C, then for z ∈ CM and Re(z) < 0, we have
Re(z)
− ν log |zb−1 (1 + z −1 b)| + mν log |z/b|
b(1 − b)
Re(z)
− (ν − mν ) log |z| + ν log(b) − mν log(b) + o(1) < 0
=
b(1 − b)
Re(Λ(z)) =
(4.7)
because mν < ν. Consequently, there doesn’t exists any other level curve which contains
0 or −b inside. But, there are another level curve L3 escaping to the infinity in the right
half of the complex plane after taking off from ̺. This behavior can also be predicted
from (4.7). Let us sketch the necessary arguments behind such predictions. Note that if
we increase the value Re(z) to the infinity with a fixed value of Im(z), then the right side
of (4.7) goes to infinity as well. This shows that at least in the right half of C, some more
solutions (other than those on L1 and L2 ) of the equation Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺)) exist.
This verifies the second claim.
(c) To show that both L1 and L2 are star shaped, we need to prove that any line from origin
can cut L1 or L2 exactly at two points. Let us fix a line rz0 in C where z0 is fixed with
Re(z0 ) = 1 and r varies over the real line. To this end, we have
(z0 )
νz0 b−1
1
∂
Re(Λ(z)) = Re
−
+ mν
.
(4.8)
∂r
b(1 − b) 1 + rzo b−1
r
One can note that solutions of the equation that the right side of (4.8) equals to some fixed
value is given by a cubic polynomial. But any cubic polynomial over R can have either one
∂
or three real roots. Next, we show ∂r
Re(Λ(rz0 ))) = 0 has exactly three real roots unless
Im(z0 ) = 0. It can be readily verified that (i) when r ↓ 0, then right side of (4.8) increases
∂
Re(Λ(rz0 ))) → b−1 (1 − b)−1 and when r = ̺, then
to infinity, (ii) when r → ∞, then ∂r
∂
∂
∂r Re(Λ(rz0 ))) < 0 unless Im(z0 ) = 0. This shows the equation ∂r Re(Λ(rz0 ))) = 0 has at
+
least two distinct solutions on R unless Im(z0 ) = 0. Further, co-efficient of r 3 and the
constant term in the denominator of (4.8) have same sign. This proves the existence of
three real roots out of which two must be positive and last one should be negative. Even
those two positive roots are distinct unless Im(z0 ) = 0. Thus, except for the case when
Im(z0 ) = 0, none of the roots is an inflection point. We have seen Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺))
has at least five roots along the line rz0 (four on L1 & L2 and fifth one on L3 ). As
∂
Re(Λ(rz0 )) vanishes in between any two roots of the same sign, therefore,
we know ∂r
number of roots of Re(Λ(rz0 )) = Re(Λ(̺)) cannot be greater than five. Otherwise, pairs
of consecutive roots with the same sign must be greater than three contradicting the fact
that the numerator of the right hand side in (4.8) is a polynomial of degree 3 in r. Thus,
the third claim is proved.
∂
(d) Fourth claim again follows from the fact that the equation ∂r
Re(Λ(rz0 ))) = 0 has exactly
three solutions in r except when Im(z0 ) = 0. If L1 meets L2 at some point ̺′ 6= ̺,
∂
Re(Λ(r̺′ ))) = 0 is supposed to have at most two real solutions. Thus, ̺′ cannot
then ∂r
be different from ̺. But in the latter case, Re(Λ(r̺)) = (Λ(̺)) is satisfied for three
distinct values of r, namely, 1, d1 ̺−1 and d2 ̺−1 . As a matter of fact, we know d1 6= d2 .
Consequently, L1 has no other point of intersection with L2 except at ̺. Similarly, one
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
27
can prove L3 doesn’t meet L1 or L2 at any other point besides ̺. Moreover, positions of
d1 and d2 over the real line implies L1 \{̺} is completely contained inside the interior of
the region bounded by L2 .
(e) To begin with, note that Λ(z) in a neighbouhood of the point ̺ behaves as Λ(̺) +
σν3 ̺−3 (z − ̺)3 . To that effect, possible choices of the tangents for any of the level curves
of the equation Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(̺)) are given by {π/6 ± 2π/3} ∪ {π/6 ± 4π/3} =
{±π/6, ±π/2, ±5π/6}. Moreover, we know L1 \{0} is completely contained inside the interior of the region bounded by the contour L2 . Also, L3 stays outside of both the contours
L1 and L2 . These together justify the claims in part (e).
Definition 4.5. We define two new contours Lw and Lv . Both Lv and Lw consist of a
(1)
(1)
(2)
(2)
piecewise linear segment (Lv and Lw ) and a curved segment (Lv and Lw ). To begin with,
(1)
(1)
Lw extends linearly from ̺ + ǫe−iπ/3 to ̺ and from there to ̺ + ǫeiπ/3 . Similarly, Lv goes
from ̺−̺σν−1 t−1/3 +ǫe−2iπ/3 to ̺−̺σν−1 t−1/3 to ̺−̺σν−1 t−1/3 +ǫe2iπ/3 . Here, ǫ will be chosen
(1)
(1)
in such a way that (i) Lv is completely contained inside L2 and Lw \{̺} does not intersect
L2 anywhere else, (ii) |R((z − ̺))| is bounded above by c|z − ̺|3 for some small constant c.
(2)
Next, Lw starts from the point ̺ + ǫeiπ/3 and encircles around L2 to join ̺ + ǫe−iπ/3 . On the
(2)
contrary, Lv starts from the point ̺ − ̺σν−1 t−1/3 + ǫe2iπ/3 and curves around 0 and −b to
meet ̺ − ̺σν−1 t−1/3 + ǫe−2iπ/3 . But, it never goes out of the contour L2 . It can be ascertained
that both Lv and Lw are bounded away from L2 in a ǫ-neighborhood of ̺ by choosing ǫ
appropriately.
L3
Lw
L2
+
+
Lv
−
−b
L1
̺
bα−1
−
L3
Fig 5: In the above plot, dashed lines denote the level curves of the equation Re(Λ(z)) =
Re(Λ(̺)) whereas solid lines indicate the contour Lv and Lw respectively. Signature of the
function Re(Λ(z) − Λ(̺)) has been shown in the respective regions with ± signs.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
28
We deform the contours of v and w to Lv and Lw respectively. Such deformations is possible
because Lv sits completely inside Lw whereas previously, contour for v was CbR |w| . It can be
also noted that we didn’t allow any poles to cross in between in doing the deformations of
the contours. Consequently, we have Re(Λ(w)) < Re(Λ(v)) for all w ∈ Lw and for all v ∈ Lv .
In what follows, we show how the contribution of the integrals of Kb (ζt ) over the contour Lw
dominates the rest in the Fredholm determinant in Proposition 4.1 (4.1).
Lemma 4.6. There exists some c, C > 0 and t0 > 0, such that for all t ≥ t0
|Kζbt (w, w′ )| ≤ C
max{ǫ−1 , ̺−1 σν t1/2 }
exp −c(t + |w|) + sσ̃ν t1/3 |w| ∨ |w|−1
log(1 + ǫ)
(4.9)
(2)
where w ∈ Lw , w′ ∈ Lw and ǫ is defined in Definition 4.5. Moreover, the following convergence holds
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) = 0
t→∞
w
(4.10)
Proof. To show (4.9), we need to bound the integrand in (5.13) with suitable integrable
functions. In the following discussion, we enlist the upper bounds on the absolute value of
each of the components of the integrand.
(2)
(i) For any two points v and w on the contours Lv and Lw respectively, we know Re(Λ(w)) <
Re(Λ(v)). In fact, using the compactness of the respective contours, we can further say
that there exists c > 0 such that Re(Λ(w)) − Re(Λ(v)) < −c whenever v ∈ Lv and
(1)
w ∈ Lw . Furthermore, for any complex number z, we have log |z| ≤ |z| ∨ |z|−1 . To sum
up, we get
exp(t(Λ(w) − Λ(v)) + t1/3 sσν (log(v) − log(w))) ≤ exp(−tc + sσν t1/3 |w| ∨ |w|−1 ).
(4.11)
(ii) For any k ∈ Z\{0}, a crude upper bound on the sine function in the integrand is given
by
π
(log(v/w)) + 2πik | ≥ C ′ exp(2π|k|)
(4.12)
| sin
log(b)
for some constant C ′ > 0. For the case when k = 0, | sin((π/ log(b)) log(v/w))| is bounded
(2)
below by C ′′ minv∈L ,w∈L(2) | log |(v/w)||. Recall that Lw stays at least ǫ away from the
v
w
contour L2 . Thus, we have
min
(2)
v∈Lv ,w∈Lw
| log |(v/w)|| ≥ log(1 + ǫ).
(4.13)
Henceforth, (4.12) and (4.13) implies that
X
k∈Z
1
sin
π
log(b) (log(v/w))
+ 2πik
≤
∞
X
2
exp(−2πk).
log(1 + ǫ)
(4.14)
k=0
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
29
(iii) Among the other components, the following bounds can be readily proved.
−1
αb
(αb−1 v; b)∞
≤ exp
(|v| + |w|) ,
(αb−1 w; b)∞
1−b
1
1
≤ max{ǫ−1 , ̺−1 σν t1/2 }.
≤
max
v∈Lv ,w ′ ∈Lw v − w ′
v−w
(4.15)
Thus, these completes the proof of (4.9). Next, we show the limit in (4.10). For that, decompose
Kζb as
Kζbt (w, w′ ) := Kζb,1
(w, w′ ) + Kζbt (w, w′ ),
t
(4.16)
b
(2)
′
= Kζbt (w, w′ )1(w ∈ L(1)
w ) + Kζt (w, w )1(w ∈ Lw ).
Using the definition of the Fredholm determinant in (A.1), one can write
det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) )
(4.17)
w
Z
Z
X
1
| det(Kζbt (wi , wj )) − det(Kζb,1
(wi , wj ))|dw1 . . . dwn .
≤
...
t
n!(2πi)n Lw
Lw
n≥0
Furthermore, (4.16) implies
| det(Kζbt (wi , wj )) − det(Kζb,1
(wi , wj ))| ≤
t
X
τ1 ,...,τn ∈{1,2}
(τ1 ,...,τn )
6=(1,...,1)
b,τ
| det(Kζt j (wi , wj ))|
(4.18)
b,τ
where for any fixed (τ1 , . . . , τn ) ∈ {1, 2}n , (Kζt j (wi , wj ))ni,j=1 denotes a matrix whose j-th
b,τ
column is given by the j-th column of Kζt j . Using the bound on the kernel in (4.9), we have
!
n
n
X
X
ǫ−n tn/2
b,τj
−1
1/2
.
| det(Kζt (wi , wj ))| ≤ C
|wi | ∨ |wi |
|wi | + sσν t
exp −tc + c
(log(1 + ǫ))n
i=1
i=1
Moreover, there are 2n − 1 many terms in the sum in the right side of (4.18). These implies
one can further bound the right side of (4.17) by
det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) ≤ C exp(−ct + c′ t1/2 )
w
(4.19)
for some constant C, c, c′ > 0. Notice that the right side of (4.19) converges to 0 as t tends
to ∞. This implies that the difference of two Fredholm determinant in (4.10) is exponentially
decaying to 0.
We have decomposed the kernel Kζbt in (4.16). Apart from that, there is another kind of
canonical decomposition of Kζbt based on the division of the integral in (4.6) into two parts.
For instance, let us consider
(1)
(2)
Kζbt (w, w′ ) = Kζ1 (w, w′ ) + Kζt (w, w′ )
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
30
where for l = 1, 2
(1)
Kζt
∞ Z
exp t(Λ(v) − Λ(w)) + sσν t1/3 (log(v) − log(w))
1 X
:=
(l)
π
2i
(log(v) − log(w)) + 2πik
sin log(b)
k=−∞ Lv
αb−1 v; b ∞
exp (s (log(v) − log(w)))
dv
×
×
× .
′
−1
log(b)(v − w )
(αb w; b)∞
v
(2)
In what follows, we show that the contribution of the kernel Kζ2 in det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) fades
way as t grows up.
Lemma 4.7. There exist c, C > 0 such that
ǫ−1
(2)
|Kζt (w, w′ )| ≤
exp −c(t + |w|) + sσν t1/3 |w| ∨ |w|−1
log(1 + ǫ)
(4.20)
(1)
holds for all w, w′ ∈ Lw . Thus, one would get
(1)
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) − det(1 + Kζt )L2 (L(1) ) = 0.
t→∞
w
w
(4.21)
Proof. Like in the proof of (4.9), (4.20) can be proved using the bound on each of the com(2)
ponents of the integrand of Kζt . Bound for the exponential term in the integrand would be
exactly same as what had been derived in (4.11). For the series over inverse sin function, we
use the bounds in (4.12) and (4.13) together to get (4.14). We must point out here that mini(2)
(1)
mum value of | log |v/w|| for any v ∈ Lv and w′ ∈ Lw is again bounded below by log(1 + ǫ),
thus, verifying (4.13) in the present scenario. Bound on the infinite product term in (4.15) will
(2)
(1)
again be the same. Minimum distance between any two points on the contour Lv and Lw is
ǫ. Thus, bound on |1/(v − w′ )| for the present scenario is only ǫ−1 . These all together establish
the inequality in (4.20). Using the expansion of the Fredholm determinant as in (4.17) and
bound on difference between two determinants like in (4.18), one can complete the proof of
(2)
(4.21) given the bound on the kernel Kζt . As the bounds in (4.9) and (4.20) are almost same,
thus, it implies that difference of two Fredholm determiant in (4.21) also decays exponentially
fast as t escapes to ∞.
Now, we make a substitutions of the variables v, w and w′ in the ǫ-neighborhood of ̺. In
particular, we transform
v 7→ ̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ,
w 7→ ̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃,
w′ 7→ ̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃′ .
(4.22)
(1)
To the effect of these substitutions, transformed kernel Kζt looks like
(1)
Kζt
∞ Z
t−1/3 ̺σν−1 X
=
(1)
2i
Lṽ sin
k=−∞
exp t(Λ(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − Λ(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃))
+ t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)) + 2πik
exp sσν t1/3 log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)
×
log(b)(ṽ − w̃′ )
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ); b ∞
dṽ
×
×
.
(4.23)
−1
−1
−1/3
−1/3
αb (̺ + t
̺σν w̃); b ∞ ̺ + t
̺σν−1 ṽ
π
log(b) (log(1
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
(1)
31
(2)
We must point out here that Lṽ , Lṽ have been used to denote the contours for the transformed variable ṽ. Similar change in notations for the contours of w̃ and w̃′ will also be made
in the subsequent discussion. Next, we state two lemmas which essentially prove part (a) of
Proposition 4.1.
(1)
Lemma 4.8. For all w̃, w̃′ ∈ Lw̃ , we have
(1)
|Kζt (w̃, w̃′ )| ≤ C exp −c1 |Re(w̃3 )| − sσν |w|
(4.24)
for some constants C, c1 , c2 > 0. Moreover, the following convergence
Z ∞eiπ/3 exp w̃3 − ṽ3 + sṽ − sw̃ dṽ
3
3
1
(1)
lim Kζt (w̃, w̃′ ) =
t→∞
2πi ∞e−iπ/3
(ṽ − w̃′ )(ṽ − w̃)
(4.25)
holds.
(1)
(1)
Proof. For all w̃ ∈ Lw̃ and ṽ ∈ Lṽ , we have
w̃3 ṽ 3
t Λ(̺ + t−13 ̺σν−1 w̃) − Λ(̺ + t−13 ̺σν−1 w̃) =
−
(4.26)
3
3
+ t R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃) − R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ)
where t(|R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃)| + |R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ)|) converges to 0 as t → ∞. One can note that ǫ
(1)
(1)
in Definition 4.5 has been chosen in such a way that for ṽ ∈ Lṽ and w̃ ∈ Lw̃ , we have
t(|R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃)| + |R(t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ)|) ≤ c |ṽ|3 + |w̃|3 .
(1)
(1)
for some small constant c > 0. Further, we know Re(w3 − v 3 ) < 0 for w ∈ Lw and v ∈ Lv .
That implies real part of the right side in (4.26) is bounded above by −c1 |Re(ṽ)3 | + |Re(w̃)3 |
for some constant c1 > 0. Among the other components of the integrand in (4.23), we have
(i)
≤ exp (sσν (|v| − |w|))
exp sσν t1/3 log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)
(4.27)
(ii)
and, as t → ∞,
exp sσν t1/3 log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃) → exp(s(ṽ − w̃)),(4.28)
t1/3
sin
and,
π
log(b)
log(b)
sin
πt−1/3 ̺σν−1
σ | log(b)|
≤ ν
2|ṽ − w̃|
log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)
(4.29)
π
t→∞
−1/3 −1
−1/3 −1
log(1 + t
σν ṽ) − log(1 + t
σν w̃)
−→ ṽ − w̃,
log(b)
(4.30)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
32
(iii)
t
−1/3
∞
X
k=−∞
k6=0
1
sin
π
log(b)
log(1 +
t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ)
− log(1 +
t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)
+ 2πik
t→∞
−→ 0,
(4.31)
(iv)
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 ṽ); b)∞
→ 1,
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 w̃); b)∞
(4.32)
whenever t → ∞. Convergence in (4.28) and (4.30) are easy to see. To prove the inequality in (4.27), note that we have
Re t1/3 (log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/3 σν−1 w̃)) ≤ σν−1 (|v| − |w|)
for all large t. For showing (4.29), we used the fact that | sin(x)| ≥ 2x/π for all x ∈
−1
−1
[−π/2, π/2]. For large values of t, log(1 + t−/3σν ṽ ) and log(1 + t−/3σν ṽ ) will be close
enough to 0. This validates the bound in (4.29). In the third case, when k 6= 0, sin(. +
2πik) grows exponentially fast as |k| increases. This makes the series in (4.31) convergent
and hence, when multiplied with t−1/3 , it goes to 0. To see (4.32), notice that αb−1 ̺ < 1
thanks to the condition ρ > 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 . Therefore,
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 ṽ); b)m t→∞
−→ 1.
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 ṽ); b)m
uniformly over m. Moreover, using some simple inequalities like |(1 + z)| ≤ exp(|z|) for
any z ∈ C and (1 + z)−1 ≤ exp(|z|) for z ∈ C with |Re(z)| < 1, it is also easy to see
following crude bound
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 ṽ); b)∞
≤ exp(σν−1 t−1/3 (|v| + |w|)).
(αb−1 (̺ + ̺σν−1 t−1/3 ṽ); b)∞
Thus, the integrand in (4.23) is uniformly bounded by an integrable function
C
1
exp(−c1 (|Re(ṽ 3 )| + |Re(w̃)3 |) + c2 (|v| − |w|)).
1 + |ṽ|
This integrable envelop proves the bound on the kernel in (4.24). Further, using dominated convergence theorem, we get the convergence in (4.25) whereas (4.28)-(4.32) shows
the limiting value.
Proof of Proposition 4.1(a). Using Lemma 4.6 and 4.7, we have
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Cr ) = lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) .
t→∞
Furthermore, the kernel
(1)
(1)
Kζt
t→∞
w̃
has an integrable upper bound as shown in (4.24) for all w̃, w̃′ ∈
Lw̃ . Thus, using Corollary A.3, one can establish that the limit of the Fredholm determinant
det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) is same as the Fredholm determinant of the limiting kernel in (4.25). This
w̃
completes the proof.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
33
2
Fluctuations.
4.2. Case ρ = 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , FGOE
In this scenario, the double critical point ̺ of the function Λ becomes equal to bα−1 . Thus,
the deformation of the contour of w to Lw is no more viable because in Definition 4.5, Lw is
described to pass through ̺ whereas the contour of w must avoid the pole at bα−1 as stated
in Theorem 3.7. Furthermore, the result in (4.32) is also not going hold. In what follows, we
make a mild change in the definition of contours Lw and Lv to remedy those issues.
Definition 4.9. Recall all the notations from Definition 4.5. To avoid the pole at bα−1 , we
(1)
redefine Lw to go from ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫe−iπ/3 to ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 to ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫeiπ/3 .
(1)
Similarly, we shift the contour Lv to the left in the complex plane by t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 . For instance,
(1)
in this new settings, Lv extends from ̺ − t−1/3 (1 + δ)̺σν−1 + ǫe−i2π/3 to ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 to
̺ − t−1/3 (1 + δ)̺σν−1 + ǫei2π/3 . Here, δ can be any positive real number. Furthermore, ǫ must
be chosen is such a way that following conditions, given as
(1)
(1) both end points ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫe−iπ/3 and ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫeiπ/3 of Lw lie outside
the level curve L2 (see, Theorem 4.4 for definition),
(1)
(1)
(2) Re(Λ(w)) < Re(Λ(w)) for all v ∈ Lv and Lw ,
3
(3) |R((z − ̺))| < c|z − ̺| for any z in an ǫ-neighbourhood of ̺,
(2)
(2)
are satisfied. The residual parts, namely Lw and Lv are defined exactly the same way as in
Definition 4.5 except the necessary adjustments of their origins and end points. For instance,
(2)
Lw now starts from ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫe−iπ/3 and ends at ̺ − t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 + ǫeiπ/3 .
Thanks to the new definitions above, we can deform of the contour of v and w to Lv and
Lw without crossing any singularities. Moreover, one can note that bα−1 lies outside contour
Lw . To this end, one can prove the results like Lemma 4.6 and Lemma 4.7 almost in the
same way in the present
−1context except possibly with a different treatment for the quantity
αb−1 v; b ∞ αb−1 w; b ∞ in (4.15). In what follows, we carry out such changes.
Lemma 4.10. Assume ρ = 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 . There exist c′ , C ′ > 0 such that whenever
max{|w − ̺|, |v − ̺|} < c′ , then
αb−1 v; b ∞
v−̺
< C′
.
−1
(αb w; b)∞
w−̺
(4.33)
(1)
(1)
Furthermore, consider the substitutions in (4.22). Denote the contours Lv and Lw after the
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
substitution by Lṽ and Lw̃ respectively. Then, for any ṽ ∈ Lṽ and w̃ ∈ Lw̃ , we have
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ); b ∞
ṽ
= .
lim
−1
t→∞ αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν w̃); b
w̃
∞
(4.34)
Proof. To prove (4.33), let us write
αb−1 v; b ∞
=A·B·C
(αb−1 w; b)∞
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
where
v−̺
,
A :=
w−̺
Qm
j−1 v)
j=1 (1 − αb
B := Qm
,
j−1 w)
j=1 (1 − αb
C :=
34
(αbm v; b)∞
.
(αbm w; b)∞
Further, m is chosen in such a way that the inequality bm α (̺ + c′ ) < 1/2 is satisfied. To that
effect, we have
∞
∞
m+j−1
j−1
X
X
1 + αb
v
b (v − w)
|C| = exp
log
= exp αbm Re
m+j−1
1 + αb
v
1 + ψ(v, w, j)
j=1
j=1
∞ j−1
X
b |v − w|
2αbm |v − w|
m
≤ exp αb
.
(4.35)
≤ exp
1−b
1 − 21
j=1
In the second equality above, we have used the mean value theorem for the complex variables. Thus, ψ(v, w, j) denotes a complex number in the line joining αbm+j v and αbm+j w.
Consequently, one have
v−w
|v − w|
|v − w|
Re
≤
.
≤
1 + ψ(v, w, j)
1 − |ψ(v, w, j)|
1 − bm α (̺ + c′ )
This shows the inequalities in (4.35). Lastly, B involves product of finitely many terms which
are bounded above. Hence, this completes the proof of (4.33).
Further, one can write
α(̺ + t−1/3 b̺σν−1 ṽ); b ∞
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ); b ∞
(−t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ)
=
. (4.36)
×
(−t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃)
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃); b ∞
α(̺ + t−1/3 b̺σν−1 w̃); b ∞
Note that bn α̺ is bounded away from 1 for all non-negative powers of b. Thus, the second
term in the product of the right side in (4.36) converges to 1 as t → ∞. This shows the limit
in (4.34).
Now, we note down two results in the same spirit of Lemma 4.6 and Lemma 4.7. Proofs
are exactly same except one has to use the bound in (4.33) instead of (4.15). For brevity, we
omit the proofs.
Lemma 4.11. There exists some c, C > 0 and t0 > 0, such that for all t ≥ t0
|Kζbt (w, w′ )| ≤ C
1 max{ǫ−1 , ̺−1 σν t1/3 }
exp −c(t + |w|) + sσν t1/3 |w| ∨ |w|−1
|w − ̺|
log(1 + ǫ)
(2)
where w ∈ Lw , w′ ∈ Lw and ǫ is defined in Definition 4.5. Moreover, the following convergence
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L(1) = 0
t→∞
w
also holds in the present scenario.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
35
Lemma 4.12. There exist c, C > 0 such that
(2)
|Kζt (w, w′ )| ≤
ǫ−1
1
exp −c(t + |w|) + sσν t1/3 |w| ∨ |w|−1
|w − ̺| log(1 + ǫ)
(1)
holds for all w, w′ ∈ Lw . Thus, one would get
(1)
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) − det(1 + Kζt )L2 (L(1) ) = 0.
t→∞
w
w
Lemma 4.13. Recall all the notations from the previous section and Definition 4.9. For all
(1)
w̃, w̃′ ∈ Lw̃ , we have
1
(1)
|K̃ζt (w̃, w̃′ )| ≤ C exp −c1 |Re(w̃3 )| − sσν |w|
δ
(4.37)
for some positive constants c1 , c2 , C and
(1)
lim K̃ζt (w̃, w̃′ ) =
t→∞
1
2πi
Z
−(1+δ)+ei2π/3
exp
w̃ 3
3
−
ṽ3
3
+ s(ṽ − w̃)
(ṽ − w̃)(ṽ − w̃′ )
−(1+δ)+e−i2π/3
×
ṽdṽ
.
w̃
(4.38)
Proof. To get the bound in (4.37), note that integrand in (4.23) is bounded above by
1
exp(−c1 (|Re(ṽ 3 )| + |Re(w̃)3 |) + c2 (|v| − |w|))
C
(1 + |ṽ|)
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 ṽ); b ∞
.
αb−1 (̺ + t−1/3 ̺σν−1 w̃); b ∞
We have illustrated this fact in Lemma 4.8. Thus, we omit further details on it. Let us recall
that Lw is shifted to the left by t−1/3 δ̺σν−1 from ̺. To this effect, |w̃| & δ and henceforth, the
ratio of the infinite products in (4.34) gets bounded above by C ′ |ṽ|/δ thanks to (4.33). This
accounts for the term 1/δ in the bound on the right side in (4.37). Proof of (4.38) follows from
the similar arguments like in Lemma 4.8 except the limit in (4.32) should be replaced by the
result (4.34) of Lemma 4.10.
To summarize, all these results above prove
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Cr ) = det(1 + Kcrit )L2 (L̄w̃ )
t→∞
where
Kcrit (w̃, w̃′ ) :=
1
2πi
Z
−(1+δ)+ei2π/3
−(1+δ)+e−i2π/3
exp
w̃ 3
3
−
ṽ3
3
+ s(ṽ − w̃)
(ṽ − w̃)(ṽ −
w̃′ )
×
ṽdṽ
w̃
and L̄w̃ denotes a piecewise linear contour which extends linearly from −δ + ∞e−iπ/3 to −δ
and from there again linearly to −δ + ∞eiπ/3 . Hence, the proof of Proposition 4.1 (b) follows.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
36
4.3. Case ρ < 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , Gaussian Fluctuation
In this section, we prove part (c) of Proposition 4.1. Main reason behind a separate analysis
is that whenever ρ < 1 − (ν(1 − b))−1/2 , contours like Lv and Lw in Definition 4.5 or even
their modifications in Definition 4.9 contain bα−1 inside. To circumvent this illegal inclusion,
we adjust the choice of mν in the function Λ (see (4.5)) in such a way that bα−1 turns out to
be a new critical point of Λ. To begin with, the form of the kernel Kζbt is given by
Kζbt (w, w′ )
∞ Z
X
1
=
2i log(b)
C R
k=−∞
b
exp(t(Λ(w) − Λ(v)) + t1/2 sσ̃ν (log(v) − log(w)))dv
π
(v − w′ ) sin log(b)
(log(v/w)) + 2πik
|w|
×
dv
(αb−1 v; b)∞
× .
−1
(αb w; b)∞
v
(4.39)
1/2
and v respectively. Under the these
where ζt and bh w are substituted with b−m̃ν t+sσ̃ν t
recalibration, the explicit form of the function Λ is given by
Λ(z) =
z
− ν log(1 + zb−1 ) + m̃ν log(z).
b(1 − b)
(4.40)
In what follows, we perform some calculations de rigueur the asymptotic analysis. Plugging
1
1
ν − α(1−b)
in (4.40), one can write
m̃ν = 1+α
Λ′ (z) =
(z − bα−1 )(z − ̺′ )
.
zb(z + b)(1 − b)
where ̺′ := b (ν(1 − ρ)(1 − b) − 1). Under the condition ρ < 1− (ν(1− b))−1/2 , it can be noted
that ̺′ > ̺. To this end, we have
Λ′′ (bα−1 ) = −
(1 − ρ)2 ν(1 − b) − 1
.
b2 ρ(1 − b)
Further, using Taylor’s expansion, one would get
−1
Λ(z) = Λ(bα
1
)−
2
σ̃ν
bα−1
2
(z − bα−1 )2 + R̃(z − bα−1 )
(4.41)
where |z − bα−1 |2 R̃(z − bα−1 ) converges to 0 whenever z → bα−1 . In the following lemma, we
illustrate on the properties of the level curves Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(bα−1 )).
Lemma 4.14. There exists two simple closed contours L1 and L2 such that for all z ∈ L1 ∪L2 ,
we have Re(Λ(z)) = Re(Λ(bα−1 )). They further satisfy the following properties.
(a) Both the contours originate at the point bα−1 and encircle around 0 to meet again at their
origin. For instance, L1 (L2 ) in its way back to bα−1 crosses the real line for the second
time at a point d1 ∈ (−b, 0) (d2 ∈ (−∞, −b)).
(b) Contour L1 \{bα−1 } is completely contained in the interior of the region bounded by L2 .
(c) Contour L1 (L2 ) leaves x axis from the point bα−1 at an angle 3π/4 (π/4) and meet again
at angle −3π/4 (−π/4).
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
37
Apart from L1 and L2 , there exists another level curve L3 of the equation Re(Λ(z)) =
Re(Λ(bα−1 )) lying completely in the right half of the complex plane. Furthermore, L3 doesn’t
intersect L1 or L2 and escapes to infinity whenever Re(z) → ∞.
Proof. Proof of the existence of L1 , L2 and L3 are similar to that in Lemma 4.4. Moreover, property (a) and (b) can also be proved in the same way. To see part (c), note that
−1
−1 2
−1 )2 in a neighborhood around bα−1 .
Λ(z) − Λ(bα−1 ) behaves as
−2 (σ̃ν αb ) ν(z − bα
−1
−1
Thus, Re Λ(z) − Λ(bα ) = 0 implies Arg(z − bα ) = ± π4 ± 2π
2 . This indicates part (c).
We are left to show that L3 doesn’t intersect L1 or L2 . To start with, note that L3 doesn’t
pass through bα−1 . This is because there are only four possible
choices of the angles (± π4 ± π2 )
−1
that any level curve of the equation Re Λ(z) − Λ(bα ) = 0 can make at bα−1 . Thus, there
can be at most two level curves which pass through the point bα−1 . In fact, L3 crosses
the
real line at a point further right of bα−1 . To see this, notice that Re Λ(z) − Λ(bα−1 ) < 0
if Im(z) = 0 and bα−1 < Re(z) < bα−1 + δ for some δ > 0. Additionally, Re(Λ(z)) increases
to infinity with increasing Re(z). Thus, there must exists
another point on the real line to
the right of bα−1 where once again Re Λ(z) − Λ(bα−1 ) = 0 holds. This shows the claim.
Moreover, one can mimick almost the same proof as in Lemma 4.4 to show that L3 doesn’t
intersect L1 or L2 at any other point. This completes the proof.
We must point out here that L2 is no more star shaped (see Figure 6). This urges for the
necessary changes in the definitions of the contours Lv and Lw in the present scenario. In
what follows, we enunciate those changes formally.
(1)
Definition 4.15. We define the linear segment Lv of Lv to extend linearly from −ǫi +
Intbα−1 ,2δ to ǫi + Intbα−1 ,2δ crossing the real line at Intbα−1 ,2δ where
Intx,τ = x − t−1/3 τ xδ(σ̃ν )−1
for any x ∈ C, τ ∈ R+ .
(1)
On the flip side, we define the piecewise linear segment Lw to extend linearly from ǫe−iπ/6 +
Intbα−1 ,δ to Intbα−1 ,δ and from there to ǫeiπ/6 + Intbα−1 ,δ . At this junction, it is worthwhile to
point out that any particular choice of ǫ must satisfies the following properties: (a) ǫe−iπ/6 +
Intbα−1 ,δ and ǫeiπ/6 + Intbα−1 ,δ should lie outside the contour L2 , (b) in the ǫ - neighborhood
of the point bα−1 , |R(z − bα−1 )| in (4.41) must be less than c|z − bα−1 |2 for small constant
(2)
(2)
c. In particular, c = 1/4 suitably fits into our analysis. Curved segments Lv and Lw are
(2)
(1)
defined similarly as in Definition 4.5. For instance, Lv starts from the top end point of Lv
(1)
and encircles around 0 to meet at the bottom end point of Lv . To be precise, it remains
(1)
(1)
(2)
always inside of the contour L2 . Unlike Lv , starting from the top end point Lw , Lw circles
(1)
outside the contour L2 to meet the bottom end point of Lw .
In the next lemma, we show that the contribution of the kernel Kζbt in the Fredholm
(2)
determinant det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) over the segment Lw decays down exponentially.
(2)
Lemma 4.16. For any w ∈ Lw and w′ ∈ Lw , we have
|Kζbt (w, w′ )| ≤ C max{ǫ−1 , δ−1 t1/2 } exp −tc + sσ̃ν t1/2 |w| ∨ |w|−1 +
α
|w| (4.42)
1−b
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
−
L2
−
+
α−1 b
L1
L3
Lw
Lv
+
−b
38
̺
−
L3
Fig 6: Solid lines are used to denote the contour Lw and Lv whereas dotted lines indicate the
level curves of the equation Re(Λ(z) − Λ(bα−1 )) = 0.
for some constants c, C > 0. Here, ǫ is same as in Definition 4.15. To that effect, we have
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) = 0.
t→∞
w
(4.43)
(2)
Proof. To begin with, note that for all w ∈ Lw and all v ∈ Lv there exists a constant c > 0
(2)
such that Re (Λ(w) − Λ(v)) < −c. This holds due to the particular way the contours Lw , Lv
are chosen and the compactness of each of them. Other components of the integrand in (4.39)
are bounded in the following ways (i)
exp sσ̃ν t1/2 (log(v) − log(w)) ≤ exp sσ̃ν t1/2 (|v| ∨ |v|−1 + |w| ∨ |w|−1 ) ,(4.44)
(ii)
∞
X
k=−∞
1
sin
π
log(b)
log(v/w) + 2πik
≤
∞
X
2 exp(−2πk) exp
k=0
π
−1
−1
(|v| ∨ |v| + |w| ∨ |w| ) ,
log(b)
(4.45)
(iii)
1
≤C
v(v − w)
minv∈L
1
(2)
′
v ,w ∈Lw
|v − w′ |
≤ C max{ǫ−1 ∨ δ−1 t1/2 }
(4.46)
for some large constant C,
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
39
(iv)
∞
m
∞
Y
Y
Y
(αb−1 v; b)∞
k−1
m−1
−1
≤
(1
+
b
α|v|)
|(1
−
b
α|w|)|
(1 + 2bk−1 α|w|)
αb−1 w; b)∞
k=1
k=0
k=m+1
α
≤ C exp
(|v| + 2|w|)
(4.47)
1−b
where for all k ≥ m, one has (1 + 2bk−1 α|w|)(1 − bk−1 α|w|) ≤ 1.
Inequality in (4.44) is a simple consequence of the fact that
| exp(log(v) − log(w))| ≤ exp Re(v) ∨ Re(v −1 ) + Re(w) ∨ Re(w−1 )
≤ exp |v| ∨ |v|−1 + |w| ∨ |w|−1
for any two complex numbers v, w. To see the bound in the right side of (4.45), note that
sin(u + 2πik) is bounded above by 2 exp(|u| − 2πk) for all u ∈ C and k ∈ Z. It is easy to
comprehend the first inequality in (4.46). For the second inequality, recall that both the end
(1)
points of Lw are at a distance ǫ away from the point bα−1 for large enough t. Thus, it is
(2)
possible to construct the contour Lw at a distance of ǫ far away from L2 . As we know Lv is
contained in the region enclosed by L2 , thus the minimum value of |v − w′ | must be greater
(2)
(1)
than ǫ for all v ∈ Lv and w′ ∈ Lw . On the flip side, if w′ ∈ Lw , then minimum value
of |v − w| should be greater than δt−1/2 , thus shows the claim in (4.46). First inequality in
straightforward. To prove the second inequality, note that the finite product
(4.47)
Qm is quite
m−1 α|w|)|−1 is bounded by a large constant. To bound the other components
|(1
−
b
k=0
apart from the finite product term, we use a simple inequality (1 + x) ≤ ex which holds for
any x ∈ R. These all together imply the inequality in (4.42). Next, we prove the limit in
(4.43). Let us write down
b
(2)
′
Kζbt (w, w′ ) = Kζbt (w, w′ )1(w ∈ L(1)
w ) + Kζt (w, w )1(w ∈ Lw ).
. Then, using the inequality in (4.18) and the bound
Denote Kζbt (w, w′ )1(w ∈ Lw ) by Kζb,res
t
(1)
on Kζbt (w, w′ )1(w ∈ Lw ) from (4.42), we have
(2)
n
det Kζbt (wi , wj )
i,j=1
n
(w
,
w
)
− det Kζb,res
i
j
t
i,j=1
≤ C2n max{ǫ−n , (δ−2 t)n/2 } exp(−ct).
Further, using series expansion of Fredholm determinant, we get the following bound
det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) = det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (Lw ) − det(1 + Kζb,res
)L2 (Lw )
t
w
≤ C(1 + exp(−2ǫ−1 )) exp(−ct + 2δ−1 t1/2 ) (4.48)
where the right side of the inequality above goes to 0 as t → ∞. This completes the proof.
Likewise in (4.23), we further represent Kζbt as the sum of two different kernels to identify
the leading contribution in the computation of the Fredholm determinant det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) .
w
In particular, we set
(1)
(2)
Kζbt = Kζt + Kζt
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
40
where for l = 1, 2,
(l)
Kζt
∞ Z
1 X
:=
(l)
2i
Lv sin
k=−∞
exp (t(Λ(v) − Λ(w)))
π
log(b) (log(v)
− log(w)) + 2πik
(4.49)
αb−1 v; b ∞
exp (s (log(v) − log(w)))
dv
×
× .
×
′
−1
log(b)(v − w )
(αb w; b)∞
v
Following lemma which is in the same spirit of the last Lemma 4.48 proves that one can even
(2)
ignore the effect of Kζt as t increases to infinity.
(1)
Lemma 4.17. For any w, w′ ∈ Lw , we have
b
′
−1 1/2
|Kζt (w, w )| ≤ C(ǫδ) t exp −tc + sσ̃ν t1/2 |w| ∨ |w|−1 +
α
|w|
1−b
(4.50)
for some constants c, C > 0. Thus, we claim
(1)
lim det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) − det(1 + Kζt )L2 (L(1) ) = 0.
t→∞
(4.51)
w
w
(2)
Proof. Proof of (4.50) hinges upon the fact that Re(Λ(w) − Λ(v)) < −c for all v ∈ Lv and all
(1)
w ∈ Lw . This again follows from the compactness of both of the contours, continuity of the
map Re(Λ(.)) and more importantly, strategic position of the contours around L2 . Bounds
on the other component of the integrand in (4.49) can be derived as in (4.44) - (4.47). For
instance, bounds in (4.44) and (4.45) work perfectly for the current result. In what follows,
we recollect bounds on other two terms and sharpen it for the present scenario.
(i)
1
1
≤C
≤ Cǫ−1
v(v − w)
minv∈L(2) ,w′ ∈L(1) |v − w′ |
v
(4.52)
w
for some large constant C
(ii)
∞
m
∞
Y
Y
Y
(αb−1 v; b)∞
k−1
m−1
−1
≤
(1
+
b
α|v|)
|(1
−
b
α|w|)|
(1 + 2bk−1 α|w|)
αb−1 w; b)∞
k=1
k=0
k=m+1
α
≤ Cδ−1 t1/2 exp
(|v| + 2|w|)
(4.53)
1−b
where for all k ≥ m, one has (1 + 2bk−1 α|w|)(1 − bk−1 α|w|) ≤ 1.
One can prove the inequality in (4.52) by recalling that the minimum value of |v − w′ | over
(2)
(1)
all v ∈ Lv , w′ ∈ Lw is bounded below by ǫ (see, Definition 4.15). In (4.53), we cannot now
bound the finite product term by a large constant uniformly over all choices of t and w. This
is because
min |1 − αb−1 w| = δt−1/2 .
(1)
w∈Lw
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
41
This causes the factor δ−1 t1/2 to come in the right side of the second inequality. To show
(4.51), we use the inequality in (4.18) to conclude
n
n
(1)
≤ C2n (δǫ)−n tn/2 exp(−ct).
− det Kζt (wi , wj )
det Kζbt (wi , wj )
i,j=1
i,j=1
(1)
whenever w1 , . . . , wn ∈ Lw . To that effect, Fredholm determinant expansion provides the sim(1)
ilar bound as in (4.48) on the difference between det(1 + Kζbt )L2 (L(1) ) and det(1 + Kζt )L2 (L(1) ) .
w
w
This ends the proof.
Above two lemmas show that in order to find out the limit of the Fredholm determinant
(1)
(1)
in (4.2), it suffices to study Kζt over the segment Lw . Thus, like in (4.22), we make the
following substitutions v 7→ bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ,
w 7→ bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃,
w′ 7→ bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃′ .
(4.54)
(1)
To this end, one can further write Kζt in the following form -
(1)
Kζt =
t−1/2 b(ασ̃
ν
)−1
2i
Z
2
2
exp ṽ2 − w̃2 + t R̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃) − R̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃)
(1)
π
−1/2 (σ̃ )−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ )′ w̃)) + 2πik
Lṽ k=−∞ sin
(log(1
+
t
ν
ν
log(b)
∞
X
×
×
(1)
exp sσ̃ν t1/2
(4.55)
log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 w̃)
log(b)(ṽ − w̃′ )
αb−1 (bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ); b
αb−1 (bα−1
(1)
+
t−1/2 b(ασ̃
(1)
ν
)−1 w̃); b
∞ ×
∞
dṽ
bα−1
+
t−1/2 b(ασ̃
−1
ν ) ṽ
(1)
where Lṽ and Lw̃ denote the segments Lv and Lw respectively after the substitutions
made in (4.54). In the next result, we show that in fact the Fredholm determinant of the
(1)
kernel Kζ1 converges to the normal distribution.
Theorem 4.18. For all s ∈ R, we have
(1)
lim det 1 + Kζt
t→∞
(1)
L2 (Lw )
= G(s).
Proof. To begin with, we enlist below how each of the components of the integrand in (4.55)
is bounded above by some integrable function and what are their limits as t → ∞.
(i) We first look at the inequalities shown below 2
w̃2
ṽ
−1/2
−1
−1/2
−1
−
+ t R̃(t
b(ασ̃ν ) w̃) − R̃(t
b(ασ̃ν ) w̃)
(4.56)
exp
2
2
2
w̃2
ṽ
2
2
−
+ c|ṽ| + c|w̃| ≤ C ′ exp −c′1 |ṽ|2 + c′2 Re(w̃2 )
≤ exp Re
2
2
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
42
for some constants C ′ , c′1 > 0 and c′2 . To see the first inequality, recall that |R̃(z − bα−1 )|
is less than c|z −bα−1 |2 in the ǫ-neighborhood of bα−1 (see, Definition 4.15). For showing
the second inequality in (4.56), one can argue that Re(ṽ 2 ) + c|ṽ|2 ≤ −c′1 |ṽ|2 for some
c′1 > 0. This is because the complex variable ṽ varies over −2δ + iR. Thus, Re(ṽ 2 )
converges to −∞ as |ṽ 2 | → ∞. In fact, we get Re(ṽ 2 )/|ṽ|2 → −1 whenever |ṽ| goes to
∞. This completes the proof of the inequalities above. Furthermore, as t → ∞, both
tR̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ) and R̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃) goes to 0. Thus, we get
2
2
ṽ
w̃2
w̃2
ṽ
exp
−
+ t R̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃) − R̃(t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃)
−
.
→ exp
2
2
2
2
(ii) Next, we illustrate on the limit of the infinite sum over k ∈ Z. Note that for any k ∈ Z,
we have
π
−1/2
−1
−1/2
′
sin
(log(1 + t
(σ̃ν ) ṽ) − log(1 + t
(σ̃ν ) w̃)) + 2πik
log(b)
≥ C(1 + t−1/2 |ṽ|) exp(2π|k|).
Thus, it shows the series in (4.55) converges absolutely and uniformly over ṽ. Hence, as
t goes to infinity,
lim
t→∞
∞
X
k=−∞
t−1/2 π(log(b))−1
sin
π
log(b) (log(1
+ t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )′ w̃)) + 2πik
=
1
.
ṽ − w̃
(iii) Likewise in Lemma 4.10, one can prove that for all large t, there exists constants C ′ such
that
αb−1 (bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ); b ∞
ṽ
.
≤ C′
−1
−1
−1/2
−1
w̃
αb (bα + t
b(ασ̃ν ) w̃); b ∞
Moreover, we have
αb−1 (bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ); b
αb−1 (bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 w̃); b
∞ t→∞
−→
∞
ṽ
.
w̃
.
(iv) Lastly, we can put a very crude bound like
exp sσ̃ν t1/2 log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 w̃)
≤ C ′′ exp(c(|ṽ| + |w̃|))
bα−1
bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ
1
.
1 + |ṽ|
for some positive constant C ′′ , c′′ . Notice that even this crude bound doesn’t affect
integrability of the product of all bounds together because of the dominating term
exp(−c′ |ṽ|2 ) in (4.56). Further, we have the following limit
bα−1
exp sσ̃ν t1/2 log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 ṽ) − log(1 + t−1/2 (σ̃ν )−1 w̃)
bα−1 + t−1/2 b(ασ̃ν )−1 ṽ
t→∞
−→ exp (s(ṽ − w̃))
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
43
for the remaining component of the integrand in (4.55).
To this end, using dominated convergence theorem, one can write
2
ṽ2
w̃
Z
−
+
s(
w̃
−
ṽ)
exp
2
2
ṽ
1
(1)
· · dṽ
lim K (w̃, w̃′ ) =
t→∞ ζt
2πi −2δ+iR
(ṽ − w̃′ )(ṽ − w̃)
w̃
(4.57)
(1)
for all w̃, w̃′ in the limiting form of the contour Lw̃ . In Appendix A, we prove that Fredholm
determinant of the limiting kernel is indeed Gaussian distribution function.
Proof of Theorem 2.5. To show (2.2), note that
{xmν t ≤ νt +
∂mν
sLt1/3 } = {Nνs (t) ≥ mν t}.
∂ν
ν −2/3
) and L, s ∈ R. It is easy to see that νs equals to ν when
where νs := ν(1 + sLσν ∂m
∂ν t
s = 0. Moreover, using Taylor’s theorem on mνs , one can obtain
mνs = mν + sLσν
Let us choose L =
∂mν −2/3
Lt
+ o(t−2/3 ).
∂ν
∂mν −1
.
∂ν
To that effect, we have
P (Nνs (t) ≥ mν t) = P mνs t − Nνs t ≤ sσν t1/3 + o(t1/3 )
(4.58)
Theorem 2.2 implies that the right side in (4.58) converges to FGU E (s). Thus, it completes the
proof of (2.5). Similarly, the proofs of (2.6) and (2.7) follow from (2.3) and (2.4) respectively.
Proof of Corollary 2.6
Theorem 2.4 implies (t−1 Nνt (t) − mν ) = Op (t−2/3 ) when ν > ν0 . Thus, it proves the first
case. Further, note that for any ǫ > 0, there exists δǫ > 0 such that whenever ν ≤ ν0 + δǫ ,
limit shape mν < ǫ. To that effect, for any ν ≤ ν0 , we have
lim sup
t→∞
N(ν0 +δǫ )t (t)
Nνt (t)
≤ lim
≤ǫ
t→∞
t
t
with high probability. Henceforth, this shows the second claim.
5. Weak Scaling Limit
Our goal here is to prove the Theorem 2.9. Following two propositions provide the necessary
arguments needed to complete the proof.
Proposition 5.1. The collection of processes {Zǫ }ǫ is tight in C(R+ × R).
Proposition 5.2. Any limiting point Z of {Zǫ }ǫ solves the SHE.
To prove Proposition 5.1-5.2, we first show that the Gärtner transform (recall Definition 2.7)
of HL-PushTASEP satisfies a discrete SHE. This step is in harmony with the other works like
[BC95, Section 3.2], [DT16, Section 2], [CT15, Section 3]. Let us note that here onwards,
constants will change from line to line. Unless specified, they do not depend on anything else.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
44
5.1. Discrete SHE
First, we derive a dynamical equation for Z(t, x). Recall that any particle which is at left side
of any site x when gets excited can move across x with certain probability. For instance, once
the clock of the particle at site y(< x) rings at time t, it jumps across x with probability
bx−y−Nx (t)+Ny (t) . For notational convenience, let us introduce the following notation
κ(x, t) = x +
t
.
1 − bν ǫ
(5.1)
From the definition of Z(t, x) in (2.9), it is clear that contributions of the all the right
hops across x in dZ(t, x) during the interval [t, t + dt] is given by (b−1 − 1)Z(t, x)dPtx where
{Ptx }−∞<x<∞ denotes a sequence of Poisson point processes with rates
κ(x,t)
X
ηt (l)bκ(x,t)−l−Nκ(x,t) (t)+Nl (t)
l=1
and ηt (l) is the occupation variable for the position l (see, Definition 2.1). There is also a
contribution coming from the exponential growth term exp(−µǫ t). Collecting all the terms
together, we can write down the following
κ(x,t)
X
(1 − νǫ ) log b
− µǫ Z(t, x)dt
dZ(t, x) = (b−1 − 1)
ηt (l)bκ(x,t)−l−Nκ(x,t) (t)+Nl (t) −
(1 − bνǫ )
l=1
κ(x,t)
X
+ (b−1 − 1)Z(t, x) dPtx −
ηt (l)bκ(x,t)−l−Nκ(x,t) (t)+Nl (t) dt .
l=1
For the sake of simplicity, denote
dM (t, x) = (b
−1
− 1)
dPtx
−
X
ηt (l)b
κ(x,t)−l−Nκ(x,t) (t)+Nl (t)
l=1
!
dt .
(5.2)
Further, let us define
Ωx := (b−1 − 1)
X
ηt (l)bκ(x,t)−l−Nκ(x,t) (t)+Nl (t) .
(5.3)
l=1
Lemma 5.3. We have
Ωx Z(t, x) = (b−1 − 1)
X
l<x
bνǫ (x−l) Z(t, l) − Z(t, x).
(5.4)
Proof. Using the form of Ωx given in (5.3), we get
X
Ωx Z(t, x) = (b−1 − 1)
ηt (l)bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l exp(−µǫ t).
l≤κ(x,t)
We will show
X
X
bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−l/2 .(5.5)
bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l + exp(µǫ t)Ωx Z(x, t) = b−1
l≤κ(x,t)
l<κ(x,t)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
45
One can easily P
see that above result implies (5.4). For proving (5.5), we have Ωx Z(t, x) =
√
√
λǫ ǫ(1 + C ǫ) l≤κ(x,t) ηt (l)bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l by expanding b−1 − 1 in terms of ǫ. Note
P
λn+1
ǫn
ǫ
that the value of C is ∞
n=1 (n+1)! . To this effect, we have
X
bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l + Ωx Z(x, t) exp(µb t)
l≤κ(x,t)
=
X
(1 +
l≤κ(x,t)
=
X
l≤κ(x,t)
= b−1
√
ǫλǫ ηt (l))bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l +
Cλǫ ǫ
√ Ωx Z(t, x)
1+C ǫ
√
[exp(λǫ ǫηt (l)) − Cλǫ ǫηt (l)]bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l
Cλǫ ǫ
√ Ωx Z(t, x)
+
1+C ǫ
X
bνǫ (κ(x,t)−l) bNl (t)−(1−νǫ )l .
l<κ(x,t)
√
√
We wrote down the equality in the third line by identifying (1+ηt (l)λǫ ǫ) as exp(ηt (l)λǫ ǫ)−
Cλǫ ǫηt (l). In the last line, we used the fact Nx (t) − ηt (x) = Nx−1 (t) for any x ∈ Z≥0 . This
completes the proof.
Using the definition of µǫ in (2.10), one can further write down
!
∞
X
1−b
dZ(t, x) =
(1 − bνǫ )bνǫ k Z(t, x − k) − Z(t, x) dt + Z(t, x)dM (t, x).
b(1 − bνǫ )
k=0
Let {Ri }i≥1 be iid random variables such that
1
,
supp(Ri ) = Z≥0 −
1 − bν ǫ
and P Ri = k −
1
1 − bν ǫ
= (1 − bνǫ )bνǫ k
for k ∈ Z≥0(5.6)
.
Note that Ri satisfies E(Ri ) = 0. Under weak noise scaling, one can note that for small ǫ,
√
√
−1
Ri + (νǫ λǫ ǫ)−1 follows Geo(λǫ νǫ ǫ). Let us denote a Poisson point process of rate b1−b−1
νǫ
associated with Ri ’s by Γt . Its increments over the interval [t1 , t2 ] will be denoted as Γt1 ,t2 .
Further, denote Ξ(t1 , t2 ) := Z≥0 − φǫ for t1 ≤ t2 where
φǫ :=
(b−1 − 1)(t2 − t1 )
.
(1 − bνǫ )2
(5.7)
In this context, define the transition probability
Γt1 ,t2
X
Γt1 ,t2
Ri +
pǫ (t1 , t2 , ξ) := P
− φǫ = ξ
1 − bν ǫ
i=1
for ξ ∈ Ξ(t1 , t2 ). Note that support space of the transition probability pǫ (t1 , t2 , .) is Ξ(t1 , t2 ).
Moreover, one can see that {pǫ (t1 , t2 , ξ)}t1 ≤tP
2 ,ξ∈t1 ,t2 form a semi-group. We use the notation
[pǫ (t1 , t2 ) ∗ f (t1 )] to denote the convolution ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 ) pǫ (t1 , t2 , ξ − ζ)f (t1 , ζ) of any function
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
46
f with the semi-group. One can further note that pǫ (t, .) satisfy the following differential
equation,
!
∞
X
(1 − b)
d
νǫ νǫ k
pǫ (t, x) =
(1 − b )b pǫ (t, x − k) − pǫ (t, x)
(5.8)
dt
b(1 − bνǫ )
k=0
pǫ (0, x) = δ0 (x).
To put this into words, pǫ behaves as a discrete heat kernel. To that effect, we get the following
simple form of a discrete SHE
Z t
Z(t, x) = [pǫ (t1 , t) ∗ Z(t1 )](x) +
[pǫ (s, t) ∗ Z(s)dM (s)](x) where 0 ≤ t1 < t. (5.9)
t1
Further, utilizing the particle dynamics of HL-PushTASEP, we derive the time derivative of
the quadratic variation of the martingale M (t, x) defined in (5.2).
Lemma 5.4. We have
(b−1 −1)−2 Z(t, x1 )Z(t, x2 )dhM (t, x1 ), M (t, x2 )i
(5.10)
bνǫ |x1 −x2 |
(1 − bνǫ )b−1
=
Z(t, x1 ∧ x2 )dt
Z(t, x1 ∧ x2 ) [pǫ (t, t + dt) ∗ Z(t)](x1 ∧ x2 ) −
1 − bν ǫ
b−1 − 1
Proof. We know that dhM (t, x1 ), M (t, x2 )i equals to the rate at which both the Poisson
process associated with M (t, x1 ) and M (t, x2 ) acknowledges a jump in the interval [t, t + dt].
Thus, it must be equals to the rate at which any particle to the left of κ(x1 ∧ x2 , t) hops across
κ(x1 , t) and κ(x2 , t) at time t. Here, we denote min{x1 , x2 } and max{x1 , x2 } by x1 ∧ x2 and
x1 ∨ x2 respectively. To this effect, one can write
X
ηt (l)bκ(x1 ∨x2 ,t)−l−Nκ(x1 ∨x2 ,t) (t)+Nl (t) dt.
dhM (t, x1 ), M (t, x2 )i = (b−1 − 1)2
l≤κ(x1 ∧x2 ,t)
Notice that for l ≤ κ(x1 ∧ x2 , t), we have
bκ(x1 ∨x2 ,t)−l−Nκ(x1 ∨x2 ,t) (t)+Nl (t) = Z(t, x1 ∧x2 )Z −1 (x1 ∨x2 )bνǫ |x1 −x2 | bκ(x1 ∧x2 ,t)−l−Nκ(x1 ∧x2 ,t) (t)+Nl (t) .
Therefore, we can say
(b−1 − 1)−2 Z(t, x1 )Z(t, x2 )dhM (t, x1 ), M (t, x2 )i
X
ηt (l)bκ(x1 ,x2 ,l)l−Nκ(x1 ∧x2 ,t) (t)+Nl (t) dt.
= Z 2 (t, x1 ∧ x2 )bνǫ |x1 −x2 |
l≤κ(x1 ∧x2 ,t)
One can recognize the following
X
ηt (l)bκ(x1 ,x2 ,l)l−Nκ(x1 ∧x2 ,t) (t)+Nl (t) = (b−1 − 1)−1 Ωx1 ∧x2 Z(t, x).
l≤κ(x1 ∧x2 ,t)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
47
Thus, using Lemma 5.3, we can further say that (b−1 −1)−2 Z(t, x1 )Z(t, x2 )dhM (t, x1 ), M (t, x2 )i
equals to
!
∞
νǫ
X
1
−
b
Z(t, x1 ∧ x2 ) dt.
(1 − bνǫ )bνǫ k Z(t, x1 ∧ x2 − k) − −1
(1−bνǫ )−1 bνǫ |x1 −x2 | Z(t, x1 ∧x2 )
b −1
k=1
Note that one can simplifies the term inside the bracket in the above expression to
(1 − bνǫ )b−1
[pǫ (t, t + dt) ∗ Z(t)](x1 ∧ x2 ) −
Z(t, x1 ∧ x2 )dt .
b−1 − 1
This shows the claim.
5.2. Heat Kernel Estimates & Tightness
Now, we aim at proving the tightness of the sequence {Zǫ }ǫ . For that, we need to specialize
on certain properties the discrete heat kernel pǫ (see, (5.8) for definition). In the following
proposition, we provides the necessary estimates for the heat kernel.
Proposition 5.5. Given any T > 0, u ∈ R and v ∈ (0, 1], there exists C depending on T and
u such that
(i)
X
ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) exp(uǫ|ζ|) ≤ C,
(5.11)
(ii)
X
ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
p(t1 , t2 , ζ)|ζ|v exp(uǫ|ζ|) ≤ Cǫ−v/2 (|t2 − t1 |)v/2 ,
(iii)
√
pǫ (t1 , t2 , v) ≤ C ǫ min{1, (|t2 − t1 |)−1/2 },
(5.12)
(iv)
|pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) − pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ ′ )| ≤ Cǫ(1+v)/2 |ζ − ζ ′ |v min{1, (t2 − t1 )−(1+v)/2 }, (5.13)
for all t1 ≤ t2 ∈ (0, ǫ−1 T ] and ζ, ζ ′ ∈ Ξ(t1 , t2 ).
Proof. (i) Recall that φǫ (see, (5.7)) is the mean of a random walk at time t of iid Geometric
random variable with parameter (1 − bνǫ ) driven by a Poisson point process of rate
(1 − bνǫ )−1 (b−1 − 1) over the interval [t1 , t2 ]. We have noted that the support of the
transition probability pǫ (t1 , t2 , .) is given by Z≥0 − φǫ . Also define u′ := ǫ1/2 (νǫ λǫ )−1 u.
For any ζ ∈ Ξ(t1 , t2 ) and n ∈ N, let us denote
n + ζ + φǫ − 1
B(n, ζ) :=
.
ζ + φǫ − 1
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
48
For small ǫ, (1 − bνǫ )−1 (b−1 − 1) ≤ νǫ−1 . Hence, Poisson process associated with the semigroup {pǫ (t1 , t2 , .)} will be dominated by a Poisson process of rate νǫ−1 . For notational
simplicity, we introduce the following
ν −1 (t2 − t1 )n
.
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n) = exp −νǫ−1 (t2 − t1 ) n
n
P
To that effect, we can bound the sum ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 ) pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) exp(uǫ|ζ|) by
∞
X
X
n=0 ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)B(n, ζ)(1 − bνǫ )n bνǫ (ζ+φǫ ) exp(uǫ|ζ|)
Using a simple fact euǫ|ζ| ≤ euǫζ + e−uǫζ and taking the sum over all ζ ∈ Ξ(t1 , t2 ), one
can further bound the sum above by (A) + (B) where
!n
∞
X
(1 − bνǫ )
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
(A) : =
exp(−uǫφǫ )
−1
(1 − bνǫ (1−u′ ) )
n=0
1 − bν ǫ
−1
−1
= exp νǫ
(t2 − t1 ) − νǫ (t2 − t1 ) − uǫφǫ ,
(5.14)
1 − bνǫ (1−u′ )
n
∞
X
(1 − bνǫ )
exp(uǫφǫ )
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
(B) : =
(1 − bνǫ (1+u′ ) )
n=0
1 − bν ǫ
−1
−1
= exp νǫ
(t2 − t1 ) − νǫ (t2 − t1 ) + uǫφǫ .
(5.15)
1 − bνǫ (1+u′ )
Now recall b = e−ǫ
1/2
. Henceforth, one can say
1 − bν ǫ
−1 1/2
+ O(ǫ)
′ = 1 + uνǫ ǫ
1 − bνǫ (1−u )
and
1 − bν ǫ
−1 1/2
+ O(ǫ).
′ = 1 − uνǫ ǫ
1 − bνǫ (1+u )
Also, we have
uǫφǫ = uǫ(1 − bνǫ )−2 (b−1 − 1)(t2 − t1 ) = u(νǫ−2 ǫ1/2 + O(ǫ))(t2 − t1 ).
1/2
1/2
This enforces νǫ−1 1−b1−b
(t2 − t1 ) − νǫ−1 (t2 − t1 ) − uǫφǫ and νǫ−1 1−b1−b
(t2 − t1 ) −
(1−u′ )/2
(1+u′ )/2
−1
−1
νǫ (t2 − t1 ) + uǫφǫ to be bounded by some constant whenever t1 , t2 ∈ (0, ǫ T ]. Thus,
one can note right side in the last line of (5.14) and (5.15) are bounded by some constant
C which depends
P only on u and T .
(ii) We can bound ζ∈E(t1 ,t2 ) pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ)|ζ|v exp(uǫ|ζ|) by
∞
X
n=0
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
X
B(n, ζ)(1 − bνǫ )n bνǫ (ζ+φǫ ) |ζ|v exp(uǫ|ζ|) ≤ (A′ ) + (B ′ )
ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
49
where
(A′ ) :=
∞
X
n=0
≤
(B ′ ) :=
∞
X
n=0
≤
n=0
X
B(n, ζ)(1 − bνǫ )n bνǫ (ζ+φǫ ) |ζ|v exp(uǫζ)
ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
n=0
∞
X
∞
X
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
v
n
1 − bνǫ (1−u′ )
X
− φǫ
1 − bν ǫ
1 − bνǫ (1−u′ )
n
exp(−uǫφǫ ),
(5.16)
B(n, ζ)(1 − b1/2 )n bνǫ (ζ+φǫ ) |ζ|v exp(−uǫζ)
ζ∈Ξ(t1 ,t2 )
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
v
n
1 − bνǫ (1+u′ )
− φǫ
1 − bν ǫ
1 − bνǫ (1+u′ )
n
exp(uǫφǫ ).
(5.17)
Notice g(x) = |x|v is a concave function for v ∈ (0, 1). We used Jensen’s inequality for
concave function in (5.16) - (5.17) of the above computation. To this end, it can be noted
that
n
(1 − bνǫ )n
=
+ (±C + O(ǫ1/2 ))n
′
′
1 − bνǫ (1±u )
(1 − bνǫ (1±u ) )2
for some constant C. Also, φǫ =
νǫ−1 (t2 −t1 )(1−bνǫ )
′
(1−bνǫ (1±u ) )2
± C ′ (t1 − t1 ) + O(ǫ) for some constant
C ′ . For any v < 1, using Hölder’s inequality, we can write
E (|aX + b|v ) ≤ (E((ax + b)2 )v/2
for any random variable X. Thus, we have
∞
X
n=0
m(νǫ , t2 − t1 , n)
n
v
1 − bν ǫ
1 − bνǫ (1±u′ )
n
exp(±uǫφǫ )
− φǫ
1 − bνǫ (1−u′ )
1 − bν ǫ
−1
−1
(t2 − t1 ) − νǫ (t2 − t1 ) ± uǫφǫ
≤ exp νǫ
1 − bνǫ (1±u′ )
v/2
−1
νǫ (t2 − t1 )(1 − bνǫ )2
2
+ C1 (t2 − t1 )
.
(5.18)
×
(1 − bνǫ (1±u′ ) )4
To this end, we have
νǫ−1 (t2 − t1 )(1 − bνǫ )2
+ C1 (t2 − t1 )2 . ǫ−1 (t2 − t2 ).
′
(1 − bνǫ (1±u ) )4
Also, one can note that that other part of the product on the right side of (5.18) appeared
in (5.14) and (5.15). Thus, it is bounded by some constant which only depends on T .
This completes the proof.
(iii) Using the inversion formulae of the characteristic function, we can write down the following
pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) ≤
∞
X
n=0
exp(−νǫ−1 (t2
ν −n (t2 − t1 )n 1
− t1 )) ǫ
n!
2πi
Z
π
−π
|φ(s, ǫ)|n ds
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
50
where
φ(s, ǫ) =
∞
X
ξ=0
exp is ξ − (1 − bνǫ )−1
Now, using the estimate |φ(s, ǫ)| ≤
Z
π
−π
n
|φ(s, ǫ)| ds ≤
√
√ ǫ
ǫ+s2
√
Z
[−π,π]
(1 − bνǫ )bνǫ ξ .
(5.19)
(obtained by Taylor series expansion), we get
2
√
1 + |s|/ ǫ
!n
√
ds ≤ 2 ǫ
Z
∞
0
√ !n
2
ds.
1+s
(5.20)
Notice that when n = 1, transition probability is just (1 − b)bζ+φǫ which is anyway less
that ǫ. But for n > 1, using (5.20) one can further say
Z π
√ 1
|φ(s, ǫ)|n ds ≤ 21+n/2 ǫ
n−1
−π
which implies
"
#
∞ √ −1 n
X
√
( 2νǫ ) (t2 − t1 )n
−1
−1
pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) ≤ C ǫ exp(−νǫ (t2 − t1 )) νǫ (t2 − t1 ) + 2
.
n!(n − 1)
n=2
(5.21)
If X ∼ Poisson(τ ), then using Bernstein’s inequality, we have
√
P |X − τ | ≥ t τ ≤ 2 exp(−Ct2 )
for some constant. This being said, one can deduce that E X1 ≤ C min{1, τ −1/2 }. One
can now see second term in (5.21) has an upper bound min{1, (t2 − t1 )−1/2 }. Also,
(t2 − t1 ) exp(−2(t2 − t1 )) can be bounded by (t2 − t1 )−1/2 upto some multiplicative
constant when ǫ is small enough. Thus, we get
√
pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) ≤ C ǫ min{1, (t2 − t1 )−1/2 }.
(iv) Using uniform v-Holder continuity of the map x 7→ eix for x ∈ R and inversion formulae
of the characteristic functions, one can write down
Z π
∞
X
(t2 − t1 )n 1
|s(ζ − ζ ′ )|v |φ(s, ǫ)|n ds.
exp(−(t2 − t1 ))
|pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ) − pǫ (t1 , t2 , ζ ′ )| ≤
n!
2πi −π
n=0
(5.22)
where φ(., .) is defined in (5.19). Using the estimate of the characteristic function in the
last part, we can have the following bound
√ !n
Z π
Z ∞
2
v
n
(1+v)/2
v
ds
(5.23)
s |φ(s, ǫ)| ds ≤ 2ǫ
s
1
+
s
−π
0
when n > 2. Note that (n−1)(1+s)−n is a density on R+ . It is easy to see that expectation
under that density is 1/(n − 2) whenever n > 2. Thus, using Jensen’s inequality, one can
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
51
conclude that right side of (5.23) is bounded above by 21+n/2 ǫ(1+v)/2 ((n − 1)(n − 2)v )−1
when n exceeds 2. For n = 1, 2,
′
νǫ−1 exp(−νǫ−1 (t2 −t1 ))(t2 −t1 )n (1−b)|bnζ −bnζ | ≤ C min{1, (t2 −t1 )−(1+v)/2 }ǫ(1+v)/2 |ζ−ζ ′ |v
for small enough ǫ. Once again, using the property of the confidence band of Poisson
distribution,
∞
X
n=2
exp(−νǫ−1 (t2 − t1 ))
2n/2 νǫ−n (t2 − t1 )n
≤ C ′ min{1, (t2 − t1 )−(1+v)/2 },
n!(n − 1)(n − 2)v
one can bound right side in (5.22) by C|ζ − ζ ′ |v ǫ(1+v)/2 min{1, (t2 − t1 )−(1+v)/2 }. This
completes the proof.
For the notational convenience, we use Z(t, x) instead of Zǫ (t, x) for the next two lemmas.
Let us note that one can modify the scaling appropriately to get necessary results for Zǫ (t, x).
In a nutshell, the following results portray the key role in showing the tightness. One can also
find similar result in the context of ASEP [BC95, Lemma 4.2, 4.3], higher spin exclusion process [CT15, Lemma 4.3]. Recall the decomposition of Z(t, x) in (5.9). We define Zmg (t1 , t2 , x)
and Z∇,mg (t1 , t2 , x) as follows
Zmg (t1 , t2 , x) : =
′
Z∇,mg (t1 , t2 , x, x ) : =
Z
t2
t1
Z t2
t1
[pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ Z(s)dM (s)](x)
[pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ Z(s)dM (s)](x) −
Z
t2
t1
[pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ Z(s)dM (s)](x′ )
In the next lemma, we probe into the higher order norms of the processes Zmg (t1 , t2 , x) and
Z∇,mg (t1 , t2 , x).
Lemma 5.6. For any k ≥ 1 and v ∈ (0, 1], there exists a large constant C which depends
only on k such that for all t1 ≤ t2 ∈ N and ζ, ζ ′ ∈ Ξ(t1 , t2 ),
kZmg (t1 ,t2 , ζ)k22k
≤ Cǫ
1/2
Z
t2
min{1, (t2 − s)−1/2 } (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ)ds
t1
′ 2
kZ∇,mg (t1 , t2 , ζ, ζ )k2k
(1+v)/2
′ v
Z
t2
≤ Cǫ
|ζ − ζ |
min{1, (t2 − s)−(1+v)/2 }
t1
+ (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ ′ ) ds
(5.24)
(δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ)
(5.25)
where δ0 is the probability mass function of the distribution which is degenerate at 0 and Pǫ
denotes probability mass function of the random variables Ri (see, (5.6) for definition).
Proof. Fix any t ∈ (t1 , t2 ). Using Burkholder-Davis-Gundy’s inequality, we have
|Zmg (t1 , t, ζ)|22k ≤ k[Zmg (t1 , ., ζ), Zmg (t1 , ., ζ)]t kk ,
(5.26)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
52
and
|Z∇,mg (t1 , t, ζ)|22k ≤ k[Z∇,mg (t1 , ., ζ), Z∇,mg (t1 , ., ζ)]t kk ,
(5.27)
where [., .] denotes the quadratic variation. Let us denote set all of all time points at which
particles hop across ζ, ζ ′ in the interval (s1 , s2 ] by S(s1 ,s2 ] (ζ, ζ ′ ). Recall once again the form of
the Martingale in (5.2) and the function κ(., .) in (5.1). Define
X
ηs (y)Z −1 (ξ1 ∨ ξ2 , s)bνǫ κ(ξ1 ∨ξ2 ,s)+Ny (s)−y
Q(ξ1 , ξ2 , y, s) = (b−1 − 1)2
y≤κ(ξ1 ∧ξ2 ,s)
which controls the contribution coming out of the Martingale M (t, x) in the total variation
terms on right side of (5.26) and (5.27). Using interdependence of the Poisson processes
{Pl }−∞<l<∞ , one can say Q(ξ1 , ξ2 , y, s) captures the hopping effect of particles at any position
y across κ(ξ1 , s) and κ(ξ2 , s) at time s. Thus, we have
X
X
pξǫ1 ,ξ2 (t1 , t, ζ)Z ξ1 ,ξ2 (s)Q(ξ1 , ξ2 , y, s) (5.28)
[Zmg (t1 , ., ζ), Zmg (t1 , ., ζ)]t =
ξ1 ,ξ2 s∈S(t1 ,t] (ξ1 ,ξ2 )
and
[Z∇,mg (t1 , ., ζ, ζ ′ ), Z∇,mg (t1 , ., ζ, ζ ′ )]t =
X
X
ξ1 ,ξ2 s∈S(t1 ,t] (ξ1 ,ξ2 )
1 ,ξ2
pξ∇,ǫ
(t1 , t, ζ, ζ ′ )Z ξ1 ,ξ2 (s)Q(ξ1 , ξ2 , y, s)
(5.29)
where Z ξ1 ,ξ2 (s) = Z(ξ1 , s)Z(ξ2 , s), pξǫ1 ,ξ2 (s, t2 , ζ) = pǫ (s, t2 , ζ − ξ1 )pǫ (s, t2 , ζ − ξ2 ) and
1 ,ξ2
pξ∇,ǫ
(s, t, ζ) = (pǫ (s, t2 , ζ − ξ1 ) − pǫ (s, t2 , ζ ′ − ξ1 ))(pǫ (s, t2 , ζ − ξ2 ) − pǫ (s, t2 , ζ ′ − ξ2 )).
For the notational simplicity, for any two point m > n on the lattice Z≥0 and s ∈ R+
h(m, n, s) := m − n − Nn (s) + Nm (s).
On simplifying the summands in (5.28) and (5.29), one can get
X
ηs (y)bh(y,κ(ξ1 ∧ξ2 ,s),s) bνǫ |ξ1 −ξ2 |
Z(ξ1 , s)Z(ξ, s)Q(ξ1 , ξ2 , y, s) = ǫZ(ξ1 ∧ ξ2 , s)2
y≤κ(ξ1 ∧ξ2 ,s)
where h(y, κ(ξ1 ∧ ξ2 , s), s) counts the number of holes in between y and κ(ξ1 ∧ ξ2 , s) at time
√
s. Notice that pξǫ1 ,ξ2 (s, t2 , ζ) ≤ C ǫ max{1, (t2 − s)−1/2
}p (s, t , ζ − ξ ∧ ξ2 ) thanks to the
√ P ǫ νǫ 2|ξ1 −ξ2 | 1
is constant. Thus, we
Proposition 5.5. For any fixed ξ1 , one can note ǫ ξ2 ≥ξ1 b
bound right side of (5.28) by
X
X X
ηs (y)bh(y,κ(ξ,s),s) .
Cǫ min{1, (t2 − s)−1/2 }
pǫ (s, t2 , ζ − ξ)Z(ξ, s)2
ξ
y≤κ(ξ,s)
s∈S(t1 ,t] (ζ)
Divide the interval (t1 , t] into disjoint intervals ∩m
i=1 (si , si+1 ] where each of them is of length
less than or equals to 1. Next, recall that
X
dhM (s, ξ), M (s, ξ)i =
ηs (y)bh(y,κ(ξ,s),s) dt.
(5.30)
y≤κ(ξ,s)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
53
Using Lemma 5.10, one can bound Z 2 (s, ξ) times the right side of (5.30) by
1
(1 − bνǫ )b−1
Z(s, ξ) [Pǫ ∗ Z(s)](ξ) −
Z(s, ξ)dt .
1 − bν ǫ
b−1 − 1
√
Thus, recalling that b = e−λǫ ǫ , we get the following bound
√
[Pǫ ∗ kZ(s)k22k ](ξ) + kZ(s, ξ)k22k
(νǫ λǫ ǫ)−1
+ νǫ kZ(s, ξ)k22k
2
P
on the k-th norm of Z(ξ, s)2 y≤κ(ξ,s) ηs (y)bh(y,κ(ξ,s),s) . Also note that,
√
max Z(s, x) ≤ exp 2 ǫλǫ N(si ,si+1 ] (x) + 4(νǫ )−1 Z(si , x)
s∈(si ,si+1 ]
and
min
s∈(si ,si+1 ]
√
Z(s, x) ≥ exp −2 ǫλǫ N(si ,si+1 ] (x) − 4(νǫ )−1
max
s∈(si ,si+1 ]
Z(si , x)
where N(si ,si+1] (x) is independent of Z(si , x) and dominated by a Poisson point process of
P
rate y≤κ(x,si+1 ) ηsi+1 (y)bh(y,κ(x,si+1 ),si+1 ) . Once again, using the same analysis as above one
can show that the rate is bounded above by Cǫ−1/2 . Thus, we have
√
E exp 2 ǫkλǫ N(si ,si+1 ] (x) + 4k(νǫ )−1 ≤ C ′
where C ′ is a large constant which only depends on k. To this end, we can bound right side
of (5.26) by
m
X
√ X
min{1, (t2 − s)−1/2 }
pǫ (s, t1 , ζ − ξ)
C ǫ
ξ
k=1
inf
s∈(si ,si+1 ]
[Pǫ ∗ kZ(s)k22k ](ξ) + kZ(s, ξ)k22k .
Recall that the length of each of the intervals (siR, si+1 ] is less than Ror equals to 1. Applying
the bound inf s∈(si ,si+1 ] kZ(ξ, s)k2k ≤ (si −sk+1 )−1 kZ(ξ, s)k2k ds = kZ(ξ, s)k2k ds and using
the semi-group property of pǫ , we get
Z t2
kZmg (t1 , t2 , ζ)k22k ≤ Cǫ1/2
min{1, (t2 − s)−1/2 } (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ) ds
t1
where δ0 is the probability mass function which puts all its mass in 0. Note that we also
had made of the fact that under convolution operation, pǫ (t1 , t, .) and Pǫ commute with each
other. This holds because pǫ is essentially the semi-group of the random walk of the iid random
variables coming from the distribution Pǫ .
1 ,ξ2
(t1 , s, ζ, ζ ′ ) in (5.29) by
In the case of Z∇,mg , using Proposition 5.13, we can bound pξ∇,ǫ
Cǫ(1+v)/2 min{1, (t2 − s)−(1+v)/2 }|ζ − ζ ′ |v pǫ (t1 , s, ζ − ξ1 ∧ ξ2 ) + pǫ (t1 , s, ζ ′ − ξ1 ∧ ξ2 ) .
Rest of the terms in (5.28) can be controlled exactly in the same fashion as we have done for
bounding kZmg (t1 , t2 , ζ)2 k2k . Thus, one can write down
kZ∇,mg (t1 , t2 , ζ)k22k
Z t2
≤ Cǫ(1+v)/2 |ζ − ζ ′ |v
min{1, (t2 − s)−(1+v)/2 } (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ)
t1
+ (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t2 ) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ] (ζ ′ ) ds.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
54
In the next result, we present a chaos-series type bound for Z(t, ζ).
Lemma 5.7. For any k ≥ 1, t > 0 and ζ ∈ Ξ(t),
(5.31)
kZ(t, ζ)k2 ≤ 2([pǫ (0, t) ∗ kZ(0)k22k ](ζ))
∞ Z
X
hǫ (s1 , s2 ) . . . hǫ (sn , sn+1 )Ψ(sn+1 , ζ)ds1 ds2 . . . dsn+1
+2
n=1 ~s∈∆n+1 (t)
where hǫ (si , si+1 ) = Cǫ1/2 min{1, (si − s)−1/2 }1si ≥si+1 ,
Ψn (sn+1 , ζ) = (δ0 + Pǫ )n ∗ [pǫ (0, sn+1 ) ∗ kZ 2 (0)k2k ] (ζ)
and ∆n (t) = {~s ∈ (R≥0 )n |t ≥ s1 ≥ . . . ≥ sn+1 ≥ 0}. Here, Pǫ denotes probability mass
function of Ri (see, (5.6) for definition). Note that here C is a finite constant depended only
on k.
Proof. Recall the decomposition of Z(t, x) in (5.9). Using one simple inequality, |x + y|2 ≤
2(x2 + y 2 ), we have
kZǫ (t, ζ)k22k
2
≤ 2(k[pǫ (0, t) ∗ Zǫ (0)]k2k ) + 2
Z
2
t
0
[pǫ (s, t) ∗ Zǫ (s)dM (s)](ζ)ds
. (5.32)
2k
We use Jensen’s inequality to bound the first term on the right side of (5.32) by 2([pǫ (0, t) ∗
kZǫ (0)k22k ]). Moreover, one can also bound second term in (5.32) using (5.24). Thus, we get
kZǫ (t, ζ)k22k ≤ 2([pǫ (0, t) ∗ kZǫ (0)k22k ])
(5.33)
Z t
+ Cǫ1/2
min{1, (t − s)−1/2 } (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZǫ (s)k22k ] (ζ)ds.
0
To this end, using successive recursion on kZ(s, .)k22k in RHS of (5.33), one can get an asymptotic expansion. Furthermore, semi-group property [pǫ (t1 , s) ∗ pǫ (s, t2 )](.) = pǫ (t1 , t2 , .) and
the fact that Pǫ commutes with the semi-group {pǫ } helps in concluding the final step of the
inequality.
Our next goal is to prove Proposition 5.1 with some refined estimates of the norms of
Zǫ (t, x). Below, we illustrate the idea in details.
Proof of Proposition 5.1: First, we prove the following moment estimates:
kZǫ (t, x)k2k ≤ Ceǫτ |x| ,
kZǫ (t, x) − Zǫ (t, x′ )k2k
′
kZǫ (t, x) − Zǫ (t , x)k2k
v
′
≤ C ǫ|x − x′ | eτ ǫ(|x|+|x |) ,
α
≤ C ǫ|t − t′ | eτ ǫ|x| .
(5.34)
(5.35)
(5.36)
for some α := v/2 ∧ 1/4, t, t′ ∈ (t1 , ǫ−1 T ], x, x′ ∈ Ξ(t) where T ∈ (0, ∞) is fixed apriori and v
is exactly same as in (2.13). Once those are proved, we can make use of Kolmogorov-Chentsov
criteria to conclude the tightness of the sequence {Zǫ }ǫ .
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
55
Proof of (5.34): We have kZ(0, x)k2k ≤ eτ ǫ|x| from (2.12). One can further bound |ξ| by
|x − ξ| + |x|. Thus, we have
X
pǫ (0, t, x − ξ) exp(2τ ǫ|x − ξ|) exp(2τ ǫ|x|) ≤ C exp(2τ ǫ|x|).
[pǫ (0, t) ∗ kZ(0)k22k ](x) ≤
ξ∈Ξ(t)
thanks to (5.11). Consequently, first term in RHS of (5.31) is bounded above by C exp(2τ ǫ|x|).
Using the same arguments, one can also bound [pǫ (0, sn+1 ) ∗ kZ(0)k22k ](x) of the second term
in (5.31) by C1 exp(2τ ǫ|x|). Furthermore, we know
x
X
ξ=−∞
∞
√ X
√
√
Pǫ (x − ξ) exp(2τ ǫ|ξ|) ≤ exp(2τ ǫ|x|) ǫ
exp(−k ǫ(νǫ − 2 ǫτ )) ≤ C2 exp(2τ ǫ|x|)
k=0
for some constant C2 when ǫ is small enough. Thus, we can conclude that [(δ0 + Pǫ )n ∗
[pǫ (0, sn+1 ) ∗ Z(s)]](x) is bounded by C1 C2n exp(2τ ǫ|x|) for all small ǫ. Interestingly, we can
now easily compute left over integral of the second term in the RHS of (5.31). It turns out
that
n/2
Z
n
Y
(CΓ(1/2))2 ǫt
hǫ (si , si+1 )ds1 ds2 . . . dsn+1 ≤
.
(5.37)
Γ(n/2)
~
s∈∆n+1 (t)
i=1
This makes the sum in (5.31) finite and thus helps us to conclude (5.34).
Proof of (5.35): We can decompose Z(t, x) − Z(t, x′ ) as
X
Z(t, x) − Z(t, x′ ) =
pǫ (0, t, ξ) Z(t1 , x − ξ) − Z(t1 , x′ − ξ)
ξ∈t
t
+
Z
X
0 ξ∈Ξ(s,t)
pǫ (s, t, x − ξ) − pǫ (s, t, x′ − ξ) Z(s, ξ)dM (s, ξ) (5.38)
Notice that we have the bound on pǫ (0, t, ζ) − pǫ (0, t, ζ ′ ) from Lemma 5.5. One can use (2.13)
to bound the first term on the RHS of (5.38) as noted down below.
k[p(0, t) ∗ Z(0)](x) − [p(0, t) ∗ Z(0)](x′ )k2k
X
≤
pǫ (0, t, ξ)kZ(0, x − ξ) − Z(0, x′ − ξ)k2k
ξ∈Ξ(0,t)
≤
X
ξ∈Ξ(0,t)
v
pǫ (0, t, ξ) ǫ|x − x′ | exp τ ǫ(|x − ξ| + |x′ − ξ|)
v
≤ ǫ|x − x′ | exp τ ǫ(|x| + |x′ |)
X
pǫ (0, t, ξ) exp(2τ ǫ|ξ|)
2ξ∈Ξ(0,t)
v
≤ C ǫ|x − x | exp τ ǫ(|x| + |x′ |) .
′
One can identify the term in the last line of (5.38) with Z∇,mg (t1 , t, x, x′ ). It follows from
(5.34) that kZ(s, ξ)k2k ≤ C exp(τ ǫ|ξ|) for all ξ ∈ Ξ(t1 , s) and 0 ≤ s ≤ ǫ−1 T where C only
depends on T . Using the bound |x − ξ| + |x| for |ξ| in exp(τ ǫ|ξ|), one can bound [pǫ (s, t) ∗
kZ(s)k22k ](x) above by C exp(2τ ǫ|x|). Similarly, C exp(2τ ǫ|x′ |) is also valid as an upper bound
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
56
to [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZ(s)k22k ](x′ ). So, the integrand in (5.24) can be bounded above by min{1, (t2 −
s)−(1+v)/2 }1s≤t2 C exp (2τ ǫ(|x| + |x′ |)) where t2 is equal to t and s ∈ (0, t). Consequently, we
can bound the kZ∇,mg (0, t, x, x′ )k2k by C(ǫ|x − x′ |)v (ǫt)(1−v)/2 exp (τ ǫ(|x| + |x′ |)). This proves
(5.35) thanks to the fact t ∈ (0, ǫ−1 T ].
Proof of (5.36): Assume t′ < t. We can write down the following:
X
X
Z(t, x) − Z(t′ , x) =
p(0, t, ξ)Z(t1 , x − ξ) −
p(0, t′ , ξ ′ )Z(0, x − ξ ′ )
ξ ′ ∈Ξ(t′ )
ξ∈Ξ(0,t)
+
Z
t
t′
[pǫ (s, t) ∗ Z(s)dM (s)](x).
(5.39)
Notice that the first term in the last line of (5.39) is exactly Zmg (t′ , t, x). Furthermore, using
semigroup property of pǫ , one can say
X
X X
pǫ (t1 , t, ξ)Z(0, x − ξ) =
pǫ (0, t′ , ξ ′ )pǫ (t′ , t, ξ − ξ ′ )Z(0, x − ξ)
ξ∈Ξ(t) ξ ′ ∈Ξ(t′ )
ξ∈Ξ(0,t)
X
=
pǫ (0, t′ , ξ ′ )
ξ ′ ∈Ξ(0,t′ )
X
ζ∈Ξ(t′ ,t)
pǫ (t′ , t, ζ)Z(0, x − ξ ′ − ζ).
This helps us to analyse the first term in RHS of (5.39) in the following way.
X
ξ∈Ξ(t)
p(0, t, ξ) Z(t1 , x − ξ) −
=
X
ξ ′ ∈Ξ(t′ )
≤C
X
ξ ′ ∈Ξ(t′ )
pǫ (0, t′ , ξ ′ )
X
p(0, t′ , ξ ′ )Z(0, x − ξ ′ )
2k
ζ∈Ξ(t′ ,t)
pǫ (0, t′ , ξ ′ )
ξ ′ ∈Ξ(t′ )
X
X
pǫ (t′ , t, ζ) Z(0, x − ξ ′ − ζ) − Z(0, x − ξ ′ )
ζ∈Ξ(t′ ,t)
≤ C(ǫ|t − t′ |)v/2 exp(2τ ǫ|x|).
ǫ|ζ|v pǫ (t′ , t, ζ) exp τ ǫ(|ζ| + 2|x| + 2|ξ ′ |)
2k
Note that we have used (5.13) in Proposition 5.5 in the last inequality. One can bound
kZmg (t′ , t, x)k2k using (5.24). Moreover, integrand in the RHS of (5.24) is bounded above
by
√
C ǫ1t′ ≤s≤t min{1, (t′ − s)−1/2 } exp(2τ ǫ|x|)
thanks to (5.34). This enforces kZmg (t′ , t, x)k22k to be bounded by C(ǫ|t − t′ |)1/2 exp(2τ ǫ|x|).
Hence, the claim follows.
Proof of Proposition 2.12: First, we show (2.14). In Lemma 5.7, we multiply both side with
ǫ−2 (1 − exp(−λǫ νǫ ))2 . Consequently, we get
2
kZ̃(t, ζ)k22k ≤2 [pǫ (0, t) ∗ Z̃(0)](ζ)
∞ Z
X
+2
h(s1 , s2 ) . . . h(sn , sn+1 )Ψ̃n (sn+1 , ζ)ds1 . . . dsn+1
n=1 ~s∈∆n+1 (t)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
57
where
i
h
Ψ̃n (sn+1 , ζ) := (δ0 + Pǫ )n ∗ ([pǫ (0, sn+1 ) ∗ Z̃(0)])2 (ζ).
Note that Z̃(0, .) is now deterministic. Using the relation ǫ
bound on pǫ (0, t, .) from (5.12), we further have
P
ζ∈Ξ(0) Z̃(0)
(5.40)
= 1 and the upper
[pǫ (0, t) ∗ Z̃(0)](x) ≤ C min{ǫ−1/2 , (ǫt)−1/2 }.
Similarly, the term [pǫ (0, sn+1 ) ∗ Z̃(0)] inside Ψ̃n (sn+1 , ζ) in (5.40) is also bounded above by
min{ǫ−1/2 , (ǫsn+1 )−1/2 }. To that effect, one can bound the rest of the integral as
Z
−1/2
h(s1 , s2 ) . . . h(sn , sn+1 )(ǫsn+1 )
~s∈∆n+1 (t)
ds1 . . . dsn+1
(CΓ(1/2))2 ǫt
≤
Γ(n/2)
n/2
(5.41)
in the same way as in (5.37). Thus, for all t ∈ (0, ǫ−1 T ], summing (5.41) over n ∈ Z+ , we get
kZ̃(t, x)k22k ≤ C([pǫ (0, t) ∗ Z̃ǫ (0)](ζ))2 + exp((ǫt)1/2 ) ≤ C ′ min{ǫ−1 , (ǫt)−1 }
(5.42)
where the constants C, C ′ > 0 depend only on T . Thus the claim follows.
Now, we turn to show (2.15). To this end, multiplying Z(t, ζ)−Z(t, ζ ′ ) by ǫ−1 (1−exp(−λǫ νǫ )),
we get
2
X
|pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ) − pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ)|Z̃(0, ξ)
kZ̃(t, ζ) − Z̃(t, ζ ′ )k22k ≤ 2
ξ∈Ξ(0)
+ ckZ̃∇,mg (0, t, ζ1 , ζ1′ )k22k
for some constant
c. Using the bound on |pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ) − pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ)| from (5.13) and the
P
relation ǫ ζ∈Ξ(0) Z̃(0, ζ) = 1, one can get the following
X
ξ∈Ξ(0)
|pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ) − pǫ (0, t, ζ − ξ)|Z̃(0, ξ) ≤ C(ǫ|ζ − ζ ′ |)v min{ǫ−
1+v
2
, (ǫt)−
1+v
2
}.
Moreover, substituting 2v in place of v and taking (t1 , t2 ) = (0, t) in (5.25), we get
Z
h
i
1+2v
′ 2
2v
kZ̃∇,mg (0, t, ζ, ζ )k2k ≤ǫ 2 |ζ − ζ|
min{1, (t − s)−(1+2v)/2 } Ψ̃(s, t, ζ) + Ψ̃(s, t, ζ ′ ) ds
(5.43)
i
h
where Ψ̃(s, t, ζ) := (δ0 + Pǫ ) ∗ [pǫ (s, t) ∗ kZ̃(s)k22k ] (ζ). One can further bound the integrand
on the right side in (5.43) using bound on kZ̃(s, ζ)k22k from (5.42). Henceforth, this implies
kZ̃∇,mg (0, t, ζ, ζ ′ )k22k ≤ C(ǫ|ζ − ζ ′ |)2v (ǫt)−v+(1/2) .
(5.44)
But, we know ǫt ≤ T for all t ∈ (0, ǫ−1 T ]. Thus, we can improve the bound on the right side
of (5.44) to C ′ (ǫ|ζ − ζ|)2v (ǫt)−(1+v) where C ′ depends only on T .
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
58
5.3. Proof of Proposition 5.2: The Martingale Problem
Before going into the details of the proof, we present a brief exposure on the martingale
problem from [BG97].
Definition 5.8. Let Z be a C([0, ∞) × (−∞, ∞)) valued process such that for any given
T > 0, there exists u < ∞ such that
sup sup e−u|x| E(Z(t, x)) < ∞.
t∈[0,T ] x∈R
R
For such Z and ψ ∈ Cc∞ (R), let hZ(t), ψi := R Z(t, x)ψ(x)dx. We say Z solves the martingale
problem with initial condition Z ic ∈ C(R), if Z(0, .) = Z ic (.) in distribution and
Z
1 t
∂2ψ
t 7→ Nψ (t) := hZ(t), ψi − hZ(0), ψi −
Z(τ ), 2 dτ
2 0
∂x
Z t
Z 2 (τ ), ψ 2 dτ
t 7→ Nψ′ (t) := (Nψ (t))2 −
0
are local martingales for any ψ ∈
Cc∞ (R).
It has been stated in [BG97], that for any initial condition Z ic satisfying
kZ ic (x)k2k ≤ Cea|x|
for some a > 0,
the solution of the martingale problem stated above coincides with the solution of the SHE
with initial condition Z ic . In our case, if we can show any limit point of {Zǫ }ǫ started from
Z ic solves the martingale problem, then it follows from [BG97] that {Zǫ }ǫ converges to a
unique process which solves SHE with initial condition being Z ic . For solving the martingale
problem, we have to have a discrete analogue of hZ(t), ψi for any Zǫ . Note that we can take
X
hZ(s), ψiǫ = ǫ
Z(t, ξ)ψ(ǫξ)
ξ∈Z
as the discrete analogue for hZǫ (t), ψi. Let us divide (0, ∞) into a number of disjoint subintervals ∪∞
i=1 (si , si+1 ) where 0 = s1 < s2 < . . . and each has length ǫ. Let us assume that
sm ≤ t < sm+1 . On the basis of decomposition of Z(t, x) in (5.9), one can say the following:
m−1
X X
X
hZ(t), ψiǫ − hZ(0), ψiǫ = ǫ
pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) − ψ(ǫζ) Z(si , ζ)
i=1 ζ∈Ξ(si )
X
+ǫ
ζ∈Ξ(si )
+ǫ
Z
t
ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 )+ζ
X
ξ∈Ξ(sm ,t)+ζ
m−1
X Z si+1
i=1
+ǫ
si
X
sm ζ∈Ξ(s)
X
ζ∈Ξ(s)
pǫ (sm , t, ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) − ψ(ǫζ) Z(sm , ζ)
X
X
ξ∈Ξ(s,si+1 )+ζ
ξ∈Ξ(s,t)+ζ
pǫ (s, si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) Z(s, ζ)dM (s, ζ)
pǫ (s, si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) Z(s, ζ)dM (s, ζ).
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
59
Let us define Rǫ (t) as
Rǫ (t) :=ǫ
m−1
X
X
i=1 ζ∈Ξ(si )
X
+ǫ
ζ∈Ξ(si )
Also, define
Nǫ (t) :=ǫ
m Z
X
i=1
+ǫ
Z
t
si+1
si
X
ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 )+ζ
X
ξ∈Ξ(sm ,t)+ζ
X
ζ∈Ξ(s)
X
sm ζ∈Ξ(s)
pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) − ψ(ǫζ) Z(s, ζ)ds
pǫ (sm , t, ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) − ψ(ǫζ) Z(sm , ζ).
X
ξ∈Ξ(s,si+1 )
X
ξ∈Ξ(s,t)+ζ
pǫ (s, si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) Z(s, ζ)dM (s, ζ)
pǫ (s, si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) Z(s, ζ)dM (s, ζ).
Clearly, Nǫ (t) is a local martingale. Let us denote the quadratic variation of Nǫ (t) by N̂ǫ (t).
So, for showing that indeed any limit point of {Zǫ }ǫ solves the martingale problem, it is
enough to show the following:
E hZ(ǫ−1 t), ψiǫ − hZǫ (t), ψi → 0,
Z t
∂2ψ
−1
E Rǫ (ǫ t) −
Zǫ (s), 2 ds → 0,
∂x
0
Z t
E N̂ǫ (ǫ−1 t) −
hZǫ2 (s), ψ 2 ids → 0.
(5.45)
(5.46)
(5.47)
0
To prove (5.45) - (5.47), we need the following lemma.
Proof of (5.45): Here, we have to show that
Z
Zǫ (t, x)ψ(x)dx
hZǫ (t), ψi =
R
and hZ(ǫ−1 t), ψiǫ are asymptotically same in L1 . Notice that for x such that |x − ζ| ≤ 1 where
ζ ∈ Ξ(ǫ−1 t), using smoothness of ψ and moment estimates
from (5.34)-(5.36), one can say
that the sequences ǫ−v Z(ǫ−1 t, ζ)ψ(ǫζ) − Z(ǫ−1 t, x)ψ(ǫx) are L2k bounded for all k ∈ N.
This forces hZ(ǫ−1 t), ψiǫ − hZǫ (t), ψi to go to 0 in L1 as ǫ → 0.
Proof of (5.46): Recall that subintervals {[si , si+1 )}∞
i=1 form a partition of (0, ∞) such that
length of each of the interval is ǫ. Assume here that ǫsm ≤ t < ǫsm+1 . Using the smoothness
of ψ, one can get
X
X
pǫ (si ,si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) − ψ(ǫζ) = ǫψ ′ (ǫζ)
pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)(ξ − ζ)
ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 )+ζ
ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 )
+
X
ǫ2
1
2
ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 )
∂2ψ
∂x
(ǫζ) + o(ǫ)B(ζ) pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)(ξ − ζ)2
2
(5.48)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
60
P
where B belongs to L2 . Note that ξ∈Ξ(s,t) pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)(ξ − ζ) = 0. This goes back to
P
the fact that mean under pǫ (si , si+1 , .) is 0. Moreover, ξ∈Ξ(si ,si+1 ) pǫ (si , si+1 , ξ − ζ)(ξ − ζ)2 =
−1
1
−1 + O(ǫ))(ν λ )−2 ǫ−1 . Recall from
(si+1 − si )σǫ2 = (si+1 − si ) b1−b−1
νǫ (1−bνǫ )2 = (si+1 − si )(νǫ
ǫ ǫ
−3/2
Definition 2.7 that λǫ = νǫ
Rǫ1 (ǫ−1 t) = ǫ
. To this effect, we have
2
m
X
∂ ψ
1X
(si+1 − si )ǫ
Z(si , ζ)
(ǫζ)
+
o(ǫ)
2
∂x2
i=1
(5.49)
ζ∈Ξ(si )
tǫ−1
Z tǫ−1
1
∂2ψ
= ǫ
hZ(s), Biǫ ds + D.
Z(s), 2 ds + o(ǫ)
2 0
∂x ǫ
0
E
RtD
2
Simple change of variable reduces first term in (5.49) to 2−1 0 Z(s), ∂∂xψ2 ds at a cost of
Z
ǫ
an error D. It follows from the moment estimates in (5.34)-(5.36) that D in (5.49) indeed
converges to 0 in L1 as ǫ → 0. Further, we know the fact that B is in L2 . Thus, second
term also converegs to
L1 . Thereafter, one can
R t 0 in −1
R tuse DCT along with (5.45) to conclude
1
L distance between 0 hZ(ǫ s), ∂ 2 ψ/∂x2 iǫ ds and 0 hZǫ (s), ∂ 2 ψ/∂x2 ids converges to 0, thus
shows the claim.
Proof of (5.47): One can write
N̂ (ǫ
−1
t) = ǫ
2
+ ǫ2
m−1
X Z si+1
i=1
t
Z
si
X
X
ψ ζ1 ,ζ2 (s, si+1 )Z(s, ζ1 )Z(s, ζ2 )dhM (s, ζ1 ), M (s, ζ2 )i
ζ1 ,ζ2
ψ ζ1 ,ζ2 (s, t)Z(s, ζ1 )Z(s, ζ2 )dhM (s, ζ1 ), M (s, ζ2 )i
sm ζ ,ζ
1 2
where
ψ ζ1 ,ζ2 (s1 , s2 ) =
X
ξ∈Ξ(s1 ,s2 )
Recall from (5.10) that
pǫ (s1 , s2 , ξ − ζ1 )ψ(ǫξ)
X
ξ∈Ξ(s1 ,s2 )
pǫ (s1 , s2 , ξ − ζ2 )ψ(ǫξ) .
(b−1 − 1)−2 Z(t, ζ1 )Z(t, ζ2 )dhM (t, ζ1 ), M (t, ζ2 )i
bνǫ |ζ1 −ζ2 |
(1 − bνǫ )b−1
=
Z(t, ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ) [pǫ (t, t + dt) ∗ Z(t)](ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ) −
Z(t, ζ1 ∧ ζ2 )dt .
1 − bν ǫ
b−1 − 1
Furthermore, one can write
∞
X
[pǫ (t, t + dt) ∗ Z(t)](x) − Z(t, x)dt =
(1 − bνǫ )bkνǫ (Z(t, x − k) − Z(t, x)) dt.
k=0
Using (5.35), we have
∞
∞
X
X
√
√
νǫ kνǫ
ǫ|ǫk|v exp −λǫ νǫ k ǫ + kǫ = O(ǫv/2 )
(1 − b )b (Z(t, x − k) − Z(t, x)) ≤
k=0
k=0
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
61
for any t > 0. Moreover, one can deduce from (5.48) that
X
ξ∈Ξ(s,si+1 )
pǫ (s, si+1 , ξ − ζ)ψ(ǫξ) = ψ(ǫζ) + ǫ
1 ∂2ψ
(ǫζ)(si+1 − s) + o(ǫ2 )B,
2 ∂x2
where B is in L2 (R). Thus, we get N̂ (ǫ−1 t) equal to
m−1
X Z si+1
i=1
si
ǫ
2
X
ψ
ζ1 ,ζ2
(s, si+1 )b
νǫ |ζ1 −ζ2 |
(b
−1
ζ1 ,ζ2
− 1)
bνǫ −1 − 1 2
v/2
Z (s, ζ1 ∧ ζ2 ) + O(ǫ ) ds.
1 − bν ǫ
where ψ ζ1 ,ζ2 (s, si+1 ) = ψ(ǫζ1 )ψ(ǫζ2 ) + O(ǫ2 )B1 . Further, the random variable B1 belongs to
L2 . Note that νǫ > 0 (see Definition 2.7) is chosen in way so that it satisfies 1 − νǫ = νǫ2 . For
this specific choice of νǫ , we have
X
ζ2 ≥ζ1
bνǫ |ζ1 −ζ2 | (b−1 − 1)
√
bνǫ −1 − 1
=
1
+
O(
ǫ).
1 − bν ǫ
Rt
Thereafter, using continuity of ψ, one can say further N̂ǫ (ǫ−1 t) − 0 hZ 2 (ǫ−1 ), ψ 2 iǫ ds converges
Rt
Rt
to 0 in L1 as ǫ → 0. To this end, (5.45) shows 0 hZ 2 (ǫ−1 s), ψ 2 iǫ ds and 0 hZǫ2 (s), ψ 2 ids both
has same L1 limit and hence, completes the proof.
Appendix A: Fredholm Determinant
We start with the definition of Fredholm determinant.
Definition A.1. Let K(x, y) be the meromorphic function of two complex variable, invariably
referred as kernel in the literature. Let Γ ⊂ C be a curve. Assume that K has no singularities
on Γ × Γ. Then the Fredholm determinant det(I + K) of the kernel K is defined as the sum
of the series of the complex integrals
Z
Z
X
1
det(I + K) =
(A.1)
. . . det (K(zi , zj ))ni,j=1 dz1 , . . . dzn .
n!(2πi)n Γ
Γ
n≥0
Remark 1. In the usual definition of the kernel of Fredholm determinant (see, [Sim05, Chapter 5]), there is no such pre-factor of 1/(2πi)n as in (A.1). Furthermore, to show the absolute
convergence of the series in (A.1), one need to have suitable control on supx∈Γ |K(x, z)|. To
that end, following inequality (see, [Bha97, Exercise 1.1.3]) proves the absolute convergence.
Lemma A.2 (Hadamard Inequality). If D is a N × N complex matrix, then
v
N uX
Y
u n
2.
t
Dij
|det(D)| ≤
i=1
j=1
Corollary A.3. Let Γ be a curve.
Kernel K is defined over Γ×Γ. Furthermore, supx∈Γ |K(x, z)| ≤
R
K(z), where K(z) satisfies Γ K(z)dz < ∞. Then series in (A.1) converges absolutely.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
62
In the next lemma, we show that Fredholm determinant of the limiting kernel in (4.57) is
the Gaussian distribution function. Although, we couldn’t find a direct proof that result, we
believe that it is quite well known. For the sake of clarity, we present here a short proof.
Lemma A.4. Consider a piecewise linear infinite curve Γ which extends linearly from −δ +
∞e−π/6 to −δ and from −δ to −δ + ∞eπ/6 . Let us define the kernel KG for any two points
w, w′ ∈ Γ as
2
w2
v
Z
−
+
s(v
−
w)
exp
2
2
v
1
dv.
KG :=
2πi −2δ+R
(v − w)(v − w′ )
w
Then,
det(1 + KG )L2 (Γ) =
Z
s
−∞
1
2
√ e−z /2 dz.
2π
Proof. To begin with, notice that for all v on the line
R ∞ −2δ + iR, Re(v − w) < 0 whenever
w ∈ Γ. Thus, we can write exp(s(v − w)) = (v − w) s exp(z(v − w))dz. Fix any σ ∈ S(n).
To this end, we have
Z
Z
(A.2)
. . . K(w1 , wσ(1) )K(w2 , wσ(2) ) . . . K(wn , wσ(n) )dw1 , . . . dwn
Γ
Γ
P 2
vi
wi2
n
Z Z
n
exp
−
+
s(v
−
w
)
Y
i
i
i=1
2
2
vi Y
1
Q
dwi
dv
=
i
n
(2πi)n Γn (−2δ+iR)n
wi
i=1 (vi − wi )(vi − wσ(i) )
i=1
i=1
P 2
vi
wi2
n
Z Z
Z
n
n
n
exp
Y
Y
i=1
2 − 2 + zi (vi − wi )
1
vi Y
Q
dwi
=
dv
dz
i
i
n
(2πi)n Γn (−2δ+iR)n [−s,∞)n
wi
i=1 (vi − wσ(i) )
i=1
=
1
(2πi)n
Z
[s,∞)n
Z
(−2δ+iR)n
Z
exp
Γn
P 2
vi
n
i=1
i=1
wi2
2
n
n
n
+
z
(v
−
w
)
Y
Y
i i
i
i=1
2
vi Y
Qn
dwi
dvi
dzi .
wi
i=1 (vi − wσ(i) )
−
i=1
i=1
i=1
Define a piecewise linear curve Γr which extends linearly from −δ + re−iπ/6 to −δ and from
−δ to −δ + reiπ/6 . Notice that Γr tends to Γ as r → ∞. Denote the closed contour formed by
Γ and the line joining −δ + re−iπ/6 to −δ + reiπ/6 as Γ̃r . As r increases, integrand inside the
paranthesis of the last line in (A.2) exponentially decays to zero uniformly for all w ∈ Γ̃r \Γr .
Consequently, the integral over Γ̃r will converges to the integral over Γ. Thus, computing the
integral over Γn boils down to finding out the residue of the integrand at z1 = . . . = zn = 0
because these are the only poles sitting inside the contour Γ̃nr for all large value of r. Thereafter,
2
vi
wi2
!
Z exp Pn
n 2
n
−
+
z
(v
−
w
)
X
i
i
i
i=1
2
2
vi Y
vi
Qn
dwi = exp
+ zi vi
.
wi
2
Γn
i=1 (vi − wσ(i) )
i=1
i=1
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
63
Using the analytic behavior of the function exp(2−1 v 2 + vz), one can argue further
! Y
! Y
Z
Z
n 2
n
n
n 2
X
X
vi
vi
exp
+ zi vi
+ zi vi
dvi =
dvi
exp
2
2
(−i∞,i∞)n
(−2δ+iR)n
i=1
i=1
i=1
i=1
!
n
X
√
2
n
= ( 2πi) exp −
zi .
i=1
To this end, multiple integral in (A.2) becomes equal to (1 − Φ(s))n where Φ(.) is the distribution function of standard normal distribution. This implies for all n ≥ 2
Z
Z
. . . det(K(wi , wj ))ni,j=1 dw1 . . . dwn = 0.
Γ
Γ
Thus, we have det(1 + KG )L2 (Γ) = 1 − (1 − Φ(s)) = Φ(s). Hence, this completes the proof.
Appendix B: eigenfunction of the Transition Matrix in HL-PushTASEP
Proof of Proposition 3.1: Here, we sketch a proof of the present proposition extending
the arguments in [BCG16, Theorem 3.4] in the continuous case. Let us define N functions
gi (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , zi+1 , . . . , zN ) as follows
X
(t,t+dt)
yN
gi (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; z1 , z2 , . . . , zN ) =
Ti
((xi , . . . , xN ) → (yi , . . . , yN )) ziyi . . . zN
(yi ,...,yN )
where Tit,t+dt (.) denotes the probability of the transition from the configuration (xi , . . . , xN )
to (yi , . . . , yN ) once the particle at position xi gets excited in the time interval (t, t + dt). For
convenience, let us consider
gi (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , zi+1 , . . . , zN ) := g (1) (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , zi+1 , . . . , zN )
(2)
+ gi (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , zi+1 , . . . , zN ).
(B.1)
Subsequently, we describe two new functions introduced in (B.1) as follows. In the expansion of
gi , one can note the contribution of the event that the particle at position xi moves by j-steps
x
−1 xi+1
xN
zi
where 1 ≤ j < xi+1 − xi in the time gap (t, t + dt) is 1−bz
(zixi − bxi+1−xi −1 zi i+1 )zi+1
.
. . . zN
i
Thus, define
(1)
gi (xi , . . . , xN ; zi , . . . , zN ) =
zi (1 − b) xi
x
−1 xi+1
xN
. . . zN
.
(zi − bxi+1 −xi −1 zi i+1 )zi+1
1 − bzi
Lastly, g(2) takes account of the event that particle at xi jumps to the position xi+1 and
consequently, particle which was previously there in xi+1 starts to hop to the right in the
same fashion. To this end, one can write
(2)
x
gi (xi , . . . , xN ; zi , . . . , zN ) = bxi+1 −xi −1 zi i+1 gi+1 (xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , . . . , zN ).
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
64
Let us define a function g as
X
g(x1 , . . . , xN ; z1 , . . . , zN ) :=
(y1 ,...,yN )
yN
T (t,t+dt) ((x1 , . . . , xN ) → (y1 , . . . , yN )) ziyi . . . zN
where T (t,t+dt) denotes the transfer matrix in the interval (t, t + dt). Naively, g acts as a
probability generating function in the infinitesimal time interval (t, t + dt). In what follows,
it is easy to see how g and gi ’s are connected
g(x1 , . . . , xN ; z1 , . . . , zN ) =
N
X
x
i−1
z1x1 . . . zi−1
gi (xi , xi+1 , . . . , xN ; zi , zi+1 , . . . , zN )dt.
i=1
If we take N = 2, then we get
g(x1 , x2 ; z1 , z2 ) =
z x2 +1 (1 − b) x2 −x1 −1 x2
z1 (1 − b) x1
(z1 − bx2 −x1 −1 z1x2 −1 )z2x2 dt + 2
(b
z1 + z1x1 )dt.
1 − bz1
1 − bz2
Let us consider S12 g(x1 , x2 ; z1 , z2 )+S21 g(x1 , x2 ; z2 , z1 ) for some functions S12 and S21 of z1 , z2 .
One can write
z1 (1 − b) z2 (1 − b)
+
(S12 z1x1 z2x2 + S21 z2x1 z1x2 )dt
S12 g(x1 , x2 ; z1 , z2 ) + S21 g(x1 , x2 ; z2 , z1 ) =
1 − bz1
1 − bz2
x2 x2 −x1 −1
+ (1 − b)(z1 z2 ) b
S12
1
1
z1
z2
−
−
+ S21
dt.
1 − bz2 1 − bz1
1 − bz1 1 − bz2
Thus, on taking S12 = 1 − (1 + b)z1 + bz1 z2 and S12 = −1 + (1 + b)z2 − bz1 z2 , one can note
that S12 z1x1 z2x2 + S21 z1x2 z2x1 is an eigenfunction of the transfer matrix T with the eigenvalue
z2 (1−b)
z1 (1−b)
1−bz1 + 1−bz2 in the interval (t, t+dt). One can also scale S12 and S21 by 1−(1+b)z1 +bz1 z2
without any major consequences. To obtain the eigenfunction and eigenvalues for any N , we
use induction. Assume N = n − 1 and
X
Aσ g(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn−1 ; zσ(1) , zσ(2) , . . . , zσ(n−1) )
(B.2)
σ∈S(n−1)
= (1 − b)
n−1
X
i=1
zi
1 − bzi
where
Aσ :=
Y
(−1)σ
1≤i<j≤n−1
!
X
σ∈S(n−1)
x
x1
n−1
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(n−1)
dt
1 − (1 + b)zσ(i) + bzσ(i) zσ(j)
.
1 − (1 + b)zi + bzi zj
We need to show that (B.2) holds even when N = n. Consider the following
X
Aσ g(x1 , x2 , . . . , xn ; zσ(1) , zσ(2) , . . . , zσ(n) ) = (I) + (II) + (III)
σ∈S(n)
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
65
where
X
(I) : =
(y1 ,y2 ,...,yn )
y1 =x1
=
n
X
j=1
T (t,t+dt) ((x1 , . . . , xn ) → (y1 , . . . , yn ))
(1 − b)
X
(II) : =
(y1 ,y2 ,...,yn )
x1 <y1 <x2
= (1 − b)
n
X
i=1
i6=j
n
X
j=1
Aσ
σ∈S(n)
σ(1)=j
Y
zi X
x1
x2
xn
Aσ zσ(1)
zσ(2)
. . . zσ(n)
dt,
1 − bzi
X
Aσ
σ∈S(n)
Aσ
σ∈S(n)
yi
, (B.3)
zσ(i)
σ∈S(n)
T (t,t+dt) ((x1 , . . . , xn ) → (y1 , . . . , yn ))
X
X
x2 −x1
bx2 −x1 −1 zσ(1)
zσ(1)
−
1 − bzσ(1)
1 − bzσ(1)
!
Y
yi
zσ(i)
x1
x2
xn
dt,
zσ(1)
zσ(2)
. . . zσ(n)
and
(III) : =
X
(y1 ,y2 ,...,yn )
y1 =x2
= (1 − b)b
+
X
T (t,t+dt) ((x1 , . . . , xn ) → (y1 , . . . , yn ))
(y1 ,y2 ,...,yn )
Aσ
σ∈S(n)
Y
yi
zσ(i)
x3 −x2 !
bx3 −x2 −1 zσ(2)
zσ(2)
x1
x2
xn
−
dt
zσ(1)
zσ(2)
. . . zσ(n)
Aσ
1 − bzσ(2)
1 − bzσ(2)
σ∈S(n)
Y y
X
i
zσ(i)
Aσ
.
T (t,t+dt) ((x1 , . . . , xn ) → (y1 , . . . , yn ))
x2 −x1 −1
y1 =x2 ,y2 =x3
X
X
σ∈S(n)
For any σ ∈ S(n), one can note that
" x2 −x1
#
#
" x2 −x1
zσ(1)
zσ′ (1)
zσ(2)
zσ′ (2)
x2
Aσ
−
(zσ(1) zσ(2) ) = −Aσ′
−
(zσ′ (1) zσ′ (2) )x2
1 − bzσ(1)
1 − bzσ(2)
1 − bzσ′ (1) 1 − bzσ′ (2)
where σ ′ = (1, 2) ∗ σ. Thus, there will be telescopic cancellations of large number of terms in
the sum (II) + (III). To that effect, we would have
(II) + (III) = (1 − b)
X
σ∈S(n)
Aσ
zσ(1)
xn
dt
z x1 z x2 . . . zσ(n)
1 − bzσ(1) σ(1) σ(2)
(B.4)
and consequently, adding (B.3) and (B.4) shows (B.2) when N = n. To this end, denoting
(0,t)
the transfer matrix for exactly m-many clock counts in the interval (0, t) by Tm (.), one can
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
66
deduce
X
(y1 ,...,yN )
=
Z
Tm(0,t) ((x1 , . . . , xN ) → (y1 , . . . , yN ))
(t0 ,...,tm+1 )∈∆(t)
1
= exp(−N t)
m!
t
N
X
(1 − b)zi
i=1
(1 − bzi )
N
X
(1 − b)zi
i=1
(1 − bzi )
!m
X
X
σ∈S(n)
y1
yN
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
)
x1
Aσ zσ(1)
σ∈S(n)
xN
. . . zσ(N
)
m
Y
k=1
(B.5)
exp(−N (tk − tk−1 ))dtk
!m
X
xN
x1
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
)
σ∈S(n)
where ∆(t1 , . . . , tm+1 ) = {0 = t0 < t1 < t2 < . . . < tm+1 = t}. Note that exp(−N (tk − tk−1 ))
term inside the integral above accounts for the probability that N independent clocks associated with N particles do not ring in the interval (tk−1 , tk ). Once any of the N clock rings, it
P
(1−b)zi
results in a factor of N
i=1 (1−bzi ) at the front. Thus, m many clock counts add upto m such
factors. Using (B.5), one can further deduce
X
X
(N )
y1
yN
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
Tt ((x1 , . . . , xN ) → (y1 , . . . , yN ))
)
σ∈S(N )
(y1 ,...,yn )
=
∞
X
X
m=0 (y1 ,...,yn )
=
∞
X
m=0
Tm(0,t) ((x1 , . . . , xN ) → (y1 , . . . , yN ))
1
exp(−N t)
m!
X
σ∈S(N )
t
N
X
(1 − b)zi
i=1
(1 − bzi )
!m
X
σ∈S(n)
y1
yN
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
)
xN
x1
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
)
!
N
X
1 − zi X
xN
x1
= exp −
Aσ zσ(1)
. . . zσ(N
.
)
1 − bzi
i=1
σ∈S(n)
This completes the proof.
Appendix C: Moment Formula
Proof of Proposition 3.4: In what follows, we first find out the moment formula with
the initially N many particles. First, we claim that under step Bernoulli initial condition the
probability of transition of m-th particle to x by time t in HL-PushTASEP is given as
X X
κ(S,Z>0 )−mk−k(k−1)/2 Sk k − 1
m−1 m(m−1)/2
b
ρ
Pstepb (xm (t) = x; t) = (−1)
b
m−1 b
m≤k≤N |S|=k
!Si −Si−1
I
I
k
Y
Y
zj − zi
1
1
×
...
(2πi)k
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj )
1 − (1 − ρ)zi−1 · · · zk−1
i=1
1≤i<j≤k
Q
k
1 − zi−1
1 − ki=1 zi Y x−Si −1
zi
exp −t
dzi ,
(C.1)
× Qk
1 − bzi−1
i=1 (1 − zi ) i=1
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
67
where S = {S1 , . . . , Sk } with 1 ≤ S1 < S2 < . . . < Sk ≤ N and κ(S, Z>0 ) counts the sum of the
elements in S. One can note that when HL-PushTASEP is started with particles at N ordered
places (y1 , . . . , yn ) (call it Y) in Z≥0 , we can have an explicit expression of P~y (xm (t) = x; t)
given in Theorem 3.3. To put all the ingredients together, let us just recall the formula of
P~y (xm (t) = x; t) given there. For a fixed N ≥ 0, when the initial data is ~y = (y1 , . . . , yN ),
then
X X
κ(S,Z>0 )−mk−k(k−1)/2 k − 1
m−1 m(m−1)/2
b
P~y (xm (t) = x; t) = (−1)
b
m−1 b
m≤k≤N |S|=k
I
I
Y
zj − zi
1
.
.
.
×
(2πi)k
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj )
i,j∈S,i<j
Q
Y
1 − i∈S zi
1 − zi−1
x−yi −1
×Q
exp −t
zi
dzi ,
(C.2)
1 − bzi−1
i∈S (1 − zi ) i∈S
where κ(S, Z>0 ) is the sum of the element in S. The term which relates initial data with
P~y (xm (t) = x; t) in (C.2), is zi−yi for i ∈ S. To obtain the result in case of step initial condition,
we have to sum over all ~y by multiplying P~y (xm (t) = x; t) with appropriate probability. Let
us introduce k-many new variables t1 , . . . , tk which are defined as
t1 := S1 − 1, t2 := S1 − S2 − 1, . . . , tk := Sk − Sk−1 − 1.
P
To this end, we can write down Si in terms of ti by Si = ij=1 ti + i. So, initially, we would
P
have the configuration yS1 = S1 + ii , . . . , ySk = Sk + kl=1 il with probability
Sk
ρ
k
Y
tl + il
tl
l=1
(1 − ρ)il .
One can note that
k
k
Pj
Y
X Y
tj + ij
−S
ij −Sj + l=1 il
zSj j
=
(1 − ρ) zSj
tj
j=1
i1 ,...,ik ≥0 j=1
1
· · · zS−1
1 − (1 − ρ)zS−1
j
k
!tj +1
.(C.3)
Q
Q
Q
−S
Now, kj=1 zSj j in (C.3) counts for the replacement of i∈S zix−yi −1 in (C.2) with ki=1 zix−Si −1
in (C.1), whereas extra factor in second line of (C.1) comes from the second term at the end
of the right side in (C.3). Thus, the claim is proved.
Now, we turn to showing the moment formula. Given any L ∈ N, we multiply (C.1) by bmL
and sum over all 1 ≤ m ≤ N . Let us note down the following result (see, [AAR99, Theorem
10.2.1]) known as q- binomial Theorem. For any q, t ∈ C such that |q| =
6 1 and any positive
integer n, we have
n
n−1
X
Y
i
k(k−1)/2 n
(1 + q t) =
q
tk .
(C.4)
k q
i=0
k=0
Thus, using (C.4), one can write
k
X
m=1
m−1 m(m−1)/−mk+mL
(−1)
b
k−2
Y
k−1
(1 − b1−k+L .b).
= bL−k
m−1 b
i=0
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
68
To that effect, we get
min(L,N
X )
Estepb bLNx (t) ηx (t) =
k=1
1
×
(2πi)k
1−
× Qk
I
...
Qk
i=1 zi
i=1 (1
I
Y
1≤i<j≤k
k
Y
− zi ) i=1
k−2
Y
i=0
(1 − b
1−k+L
!
.b)
X
bκ(S,Z>0 )−k(k−1)/2+L−k ρSk
|S|=k
k
Y
zj − zi
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj
1
1 − (1 − ρ)zi−1 · · · zk−1
i=1
zix−Si −1 exp −t
1 − zi−1
1 − bzi−1
!Si −Si−1
dzi ,
(C.5)
where S = {S1 , . . . , Sk } with 1 ≤ S1 < S2 < . . . < Sk ≤ N and κ(S, Z>0 ) counts the sum
of the elements in S. Letting N → ∞, we sum (C.5) over all possible k ordered subsets
1 ≤ S1 < S2 < . . . < Sk of various sizes. This infinite sum can be simplified in the following
way
X
b
k
Y
S1 +...+Sk Sk
ρ
zi−Si
i=1
1≤S1 <S2 <...<Sk
1
1 − (1 − ρ)zi−1 · · · zk−1
= bk(k+1)/2 ρk
!Si −Si−1
=
k
Y
i=1
1
ρ(b/zi )···(b/zk )
1−(1−ρ)zi−1 ···zk−1
ρ(b/zi )···(b/zk )
− 1−(1−ρ)z
−1
−1
i ···zk
1
.
zi · · · zk − (1 − ρ) − bk−i+1 ρ
In what follows, we use a symmetrization identity from [TW09a, Section III] to conclude that
!
L
k−2
X
Y
b−k(k−1)/2+L−k ρk
LNx (t)
1−k+L i
Estepb b
ηx (t) =
(1 − b
b)
(b−1 ; b−1 )k
k=1 i=1
!
I
I
k
Y
Y
zj − zi
1
×
zi
...
1−
(2πi)k
1 − (1 + b−1 )zi + b−1 zi zj
i=1
1≤i<j≤k
×
k
Y
1 − zi−1
zix (b−1 − 1)
exp
−t
(ρ + (1 − ρ)b−1 − zi b−1 )(1 − zi )
1 − bzi−1
i=1
dzi . (C.6)
Moreover, following recursion
b
LNx (t)
=b
LNx−1 (t)
+b
LNx (t)
ηt (x) 1 − b
−L
= . . . = (1 − b
= (1 − b
cancels out the term (1−
Qk
i=1 zi ) from
−L
−L
)
x
X
y=−∞
)
x
X
ηt (x)bLNx (t) + lim bLNy (t)
y→∞
ηt (x)bLNx (t) + 1
y=−∞
(C.6), thus yielding E(bLNx (t) ) in (3.4) from E(bLNx (t) ηx (t)).
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
69
References
[AAR99] G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, and R. Roy. Special Functions:. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1999.
[AB16] A. Aggarwal and A. Borodin. Phase Transitions in the ASEP and Stochastic
Six-Vertex Model. ArXiv e-prints, July 2016.
[ACQ11] G. Amir, I. Corwin, and J. Quastel. Probability distribution of the free energy of
the continuum directed random polymer in 1 + 1 dimensions. Comm. Pure Appl.
Math., 64(4):466–537, 2011.
[Agg16] A. Aggarwal. Convergence of the Stochastic Six-Vertex Model to the ASEP.
ArXiv e-prints, July 2016.
[AMP02] O. S. M. Alves, F. P. Machado, and S. Yu. Popov. The shape theorem for the
frog model. Ann. Appl. Probab., 12(2):533–546, 2002.
[AMPR01] O. S. M. Alves, F. P. Machado, S. Yu. Popov, and K. Ravishankar. The shape
theorem for the frog model with random initial configuration. Markov Process.
Relat., 7(4):525–539, 2001.
[Ass02] S. Assing. A pregenerator for Burgers equation forced by conservative noise.
Comm. Math. Phys., 225(3):611–632, 2002.
[BAC11] G. Ben Arous and I. Corwin. Current fluctuations for TASEP: a proof of the
Prähofer-Spohn conjecture. Ann. Probab., 39(1):104–138, 2011.
[Bar15] G. Barraquand. A phase transition for q-TASEP with a few slower particles.
Stoch. Proc. Appl., 125(7):2674–2699, 2015.
[BBAP05] J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, and S. Péché. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue
for nonnull complex sample covariance matrices. Ann. Probab., 33(5):1643–1697,
2005.
[BBW16] A. Borodin, A. Bufetov, and M. Wheeler. Between the stochastic six vertex model
and Hall-Littlewood processes. ArXiv e-prints, November 2016.
[BC95] L. Bertini and N. Cancrini. The stochastic heat equation: Feynman-Kac formula
and intermittence. J. Stat. Phys., 78(5-6):1377–1401, 1995.
[BC14] A. Borodin and I. Corwin. Macdonald processes. In XVIIth International
Congress on Mathematical Physics, pages 292–316. World Sci. Publ., Hackensack,
NJ, 2014.
[BC16] G. Barraquand and I. Corwin. The q-Hahn asymmetric exclusion process. Ann.
Appl. Probab., 26(4):2304–2356, 08 2016.
[BCF14] A. Borodin, I. Corwin, and P. Ferrari. Free energy fluctuations for directed polymers in random media in 1 + 1 dimension. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 67(7):1129–
1214, 2014.
[BCG16] A. Borodin, I. Corwin, and V. Gorin. Stochastic six-vertex model. Duke Math.
J., 165(3):563–624, 02 2016.
[BCS14] A. Borodin, I. Corwin, and T. Sasamoto. From duality to determinants for qTASEP and ASEP. Ann. Probab., 42(6):2314–2382, 2014.
[BF08] A. Borodin and P. L. Ferrari. Large time asymptotics of growth models on spacelike paths. I. PushASEP. Electron. J. Probab., 13:1380–1418, 2008.
[BG97] L. Bertini and G. Giacomin. Stochastic Burgers and KPZ equations from particle
systems. Comm. Math. Phys., 183(3):571–607, 1997.
[Bha97] R. Bhatia. Matrix analysis, volume 169 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
70
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997.
[BO16] A. Borodin and G. Olshanski. The ASEP and determinantal point processes.
ArXiv e-prints, August 2016.
[Bor16] A. Borodin. Stochastic higher spin six vertex model and Madconald measures.
ArXiv e-prints, August 2016.
[BP16a] A. Borodin and L. Petrov. Higher spin six vertex model and symmetric rational
functions. ArXiv e-prints, January 2016.
[BP16b] A. Borodin and L. Petrov. Lectures on Integrable probability: Stochastic vertex
models and symmetric functions. ArXiv e-prints, May 2016.
[CDR10] P. Calabrese, P. L. Doussal, and A. Rosso. Free-energy distribution of the directed
polymer at high temperature. Europhys. Lett., 90(2):20002, 2010.
[Cor12] I. Corwin. The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class. Random
Matrices Theory Appl., 1(1):1130001, 76, 2012.
[Cor14] I. Corwin. Macdonald processes, quantum integrable systems and the KardarParisi-Zhang universality class. ArXiv e-prints, March 2014.
[CP15] I. Corwin and L. Petrov. The q-PushASEP: a new integrable model for traffic in
1 + 1 dimension. J. Stat. Phys., 160(4):1005–1026, 2015.
[CP16] I. Corwin and L. Petrov. Stochastic higher spin vertex models on the line. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 343(2):651–700, 2016.
[CQ13] I. Corwin and J. Quastel. Crossover distributions at the edge of the rarefaction
fan. Ann. Probab., 41(3A):1243–1314, 2013.
[CSN05] D. Chowdhury, A. Schadschneider, and K. Nishinari. Physics of transport and
traffic phenomena in biology: from molecular motors and cells to organisms. Phys.
L. Rev., 2(4):318 – 352, 2005.
[CST16] I. Corwin, H. Shen, and L.-C. Tsai. ASEP(q,j) converges to the KPZ equation.
ArXiv e-prints, February 2016.
[CT15] I. Corwin and L.-C. Tsai. KPZ equation limit of higher-spin exclusion processes.
ArXiv e-prints, May 2015.
[Dot10] V. Dotsenko. Bethe ansatz derivation of the Tracy-Widom distribution for onedimensional directed polymers. Europhys. Lett., 90(2):20003, 2010.
[DT16] A. Dembo and L.-C. Tsai. Weakly asymmetric non-simple exclusion process and
the Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equation. Comm. Math. Phys., 341(1):219–261, 2016.
[GJ14] P. Gonçalves and M. Jara. Nonlinear fluctuations of weakly asymmetric interacting particle systems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 212(2):597–644, 2014.
[GP15] M. Gubinelli and N. Perkowski. Energy solutions of KPZ are unique. ArXiv
e-prints, August 2015.
[GS92] L. H. Gwa and H. Spohn. Six-vertex model, roughened surfaces, and an asymmetric spin Hamiltonian. Phys. Rev. Lett., 68:725–728, Feb 1992.
[GS10] P. Greulich and L. Santen. Active transport and cluster formation on 2d networks.
Eur. Phys. J. E, 32(2):191–208, 2010.
[Joh00] K. Johansson. Shape fluctuations and random matrices. Comm. Math. Phys.,
209(2):437–476, 2000.
[KMHH92] J. Krug, P. Meakin, and T. Halpin-Healy. Amplitude universality for driven
interfaces and directed polymers in random media. Phys. Rev. A, 45:638–653,
Jan 1992.
[KPZ86] M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang. Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
Ghosal/HL-PushTASEP & its KPZ limit
71
Phys. Rev. Lett., 56:889–892, Mar 1986.
[Lie67] E. H. Lieb. Residual entropy of square ice. Phys. Rev., 162:162–172, Oct 1967.
[Lig99] T. M. Liggett. Stochastic interacting systems: contact, voter and exclusion processes, volume 324 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 1999.
[Lig05] T. M. Liggett. Interacting particle systems. Classics in Mathematics. SpringerVerlag, Berlin, 2005. Reprint of the 1985 original.
[MGP68] C. T. MacDonald, J. H. Gibbs, and A. C. Pipkin. Kinetics of biopolymerization
on nucleic acid templates. Biopolymers, 6(1):1–25, 1968.
[Mue91] C. Mueller. On the support of solutions to the heat equation with noise. Stoch.
& Stoch. Rep., 37(4):225–245, 1991.
[Nol92] I. M. Nolden. The asymmetric six-vertex model. J. Statist. Phys., 67(1-2):155–
201, 1992.
[Péc06] S. Péché. The largest eigenvalue of small rank perturbations of Hermitian random
matrices. Probab. Theory Rel., 134(1):127–173, 2006.
[QS15] J. Quastel and H. Spohn. The one-dimensional KPZ equation and its universality
class. J. Stat. Phys., 160(4):965–984, 2015.
[SCN10] A. Schadschneider, D. Chowdhury, and K. Nishinari. Stochastic Transport in
Complex Systems: From Molecules to Vehicles. Elsevier Science, 2010.
[Sim05] B. Simon. Trace ideals and their applications, volume 120 of Mathematical Surveys
and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition,
2005.
[Spi70] F. Spitzer. Interaction of Markov processes. Adv. Math., 5:246–290, 1970.
[Spo91] H. Spohn. Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles. Texts and Monographs
in Physics. Springer, November 1991.
[Spo14] H. Spohn. KPZ scaling theory and the semidiscrete directed polymer model.
In Random matrix theory, interacting particle systems, and integrable systems,
volume 65 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., pages 483–493. Cambridge Univ. Press,
New York, 2014.
[SS10] T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn. One-dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation: An
exact solution and its universality. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:230602, Jun 2010.
[TW08] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. A Fredholm determinant representation in ASEP.
J. Stat. Phys., 132(2):291–300, 2008.
[TW09a] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. Asymptotics in ASEP with step initial condition.
Comm. Math. Phys., 290(1):129–154, 2009.
[TW09b] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. On ASEP with step Bernoulli initial condition. J.
Stat. Phys., 137(5):825–838, 2009.
[TW11] C. A. Tracy and H. Widom. Formulas and asymptotics for the asymmetric simple
exclusion process. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom., 14(3):211–235, 2011.
imsart-generic ver. 2011/11/15 file: HL-PushTASEPandItsKPZLimit.tex date: January 26, 2017
| 10math.ST
|
Image Captioning using Deep Neural
Architectures
Parth Shah (orcid.org/0000-0002-7880-2228), Vishvajit Bakarola
(orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-9194), and Supriya Pati
(orcid.org/0000-0001-5528-6104)
arXiv:1801.05568v1 [cs.CV] 17 Jan 2018
Chhotubhai Gopalbhai Patel Institute of Technology, Bardoli, India
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Abstract. Automatically creating the description of an image using any
natural languages sentence like English is a very challenging task. It requires expertise of both image processing as well as natural language
processing. This paper discuss about different available models for image captioning task. We have also discussed about how the advancement
in the task of object recognition and machine translation has greatly
improved the performance of image captioning model in recent years. In
addition to that we have discussed how this model can be implemented.
In the end, we have also evaluated the performance of model using standard evaluation matrices.
Keywords: Deep Learning, Deep Neural Network, Image Captioning, Object
Recognition, Machine Translation, Natural Language Processing, Natural Language Generation
1
Introduction
A single image can contain large amount of information in it. Humans have
ability to parse this large amount of information by single glance of it. Humans
normally communicate though written or spoken language. They can use languages for describing any image. Every individual will generate different caption
for same image. If we can achieve same task with machine it will be greatly
helpful for variety of tasks. However, generating captions for an image is very
challenging task for machine. In order to perform caption generation task by machine, it requires brief understanding of natural language processing and ability
to identify and relate objects in an image. Some of the early approaches that
tried to solve these challenge are often based on hard-coded features and well
defined syntax. This limits the type of sentence that can be generated by any
given model. In order to overcome this limitation the main challenge is to make
model free of any hard-coded feature or sentence templates. Rule for forming
models should be learned from the training data.
Another challenge is that there are large number of images available with
their associated text available in the ever expanding internet. However, most of
them are noisy hence it can not be directly used in image captioning model.
Training an image captioning model requires huge dataset with properly available annotated image by multiple persons.
In this paper, we have studied collections of different existing natural image
captioning models and how they compose new caption for unseen images. We
have also presented results of our implementation of these model and compared
them.
Section 2 of this paper describes Related Work in detail. Show & Tell model
in detailed is described in Section 3. Section 4 contains details about implementation environment and dataset. Results and Discussion is provided in detail in
Section 5. At the end we provided our concluding remarks in section 6.
2
Related work
Creating captioning system that accurately generate captions like human depends on the connection between importance of object in image and how they
will be related to other objects in image. Image can be described using more than
one sentence but to efficiently train the image captioning model we requires only
single sentence that can be provided as a caption. This leads to problem of text
summarization in natural language processing.
There are mainly two different way to perform the task of image captioning.
These two types are basically retrieval based method and generative method.
From that most of work is done based on retrieval based method. One of the
best model of retrieval based method is Im2Txt model [1]. It was proposed by
Vicente Ordonez, Girish Kulkarni and Tamara L Berg. Their system is divided
into mainly two part 1) Image matching and 2) Caption generation. First we
will provide our input image to model. Matching image will be retrieved from
database containing images and its appropriate caption. Once we find matching images we will compare extracted high level objects from original image and
matching images. Images will then reranked based on the content matched. Once
it is reranked caption of top-n ranked images will be returned. The main limitation of these retrieval based method is that it can only produce captions which
are already present in database. It can not generate novel captions.
This limitation of retrieval based method is solved in generative models.
Using generative models we can create novel sentences. Generative models can
be of two types either pipeline based model or end to end model. Pipeline type
models uses two separate learning process, one for language modeling and and
one for image recognition. They first identify objects in image and provides the
result of it to language modeling task. While in end-to-end models we combine
both language modeling and image recognition models in single end to end model
[2]. Both part of model learn at the same time in end-to-end system. They are
typically created by combination of convolutional and recurrent neural networks.
Show & Tell model proposed by Vinyals et al. is of generative type end-toend model. Show & Tell model uses recent advancement in image recognition
and neural machine translation for image captioning task. It uses combination of
Inception-v3 model and LSTM cells [3]. Here Inception-v3 model will provides
object recognition capability while LSTM cell provides it language modeling
capability [4][5].
3
Show & Tell Model
Recurrent neural networks generally used in neural machine translation [6]. They
encodes the variable length inputs into a fixed dimensional vectors. Then it
uses these vector representation to decode to the desired output sequence [7][8].
Instead of using text as input to encoder Show & Tell model uses image as
input. This image is then converted to word vector and then this word vector is
translated to caption using Recurrent neural networks as decoder.
To achieve this goal, Show & Tell model is created by hybridizing two different
models. It takes input as the image and provides it to Inception-v3 model. At the
end of Inception-v3 model single fully connected layer is added. This layer will
transform output of Inception-v3 model into word embedding vector. We input
this word embedding vector into series of LSTM cell. LSTM cell provides ability
to store and retrieve sequential information through time. This helps to generate
the sentences with keeping previous words in context. Training of Show & Tell
Fig. 1: Architecture of Show & Tell Model
model can be divided into two part. First part is of training process where model
learns its parameters. While second part is of testing process. In testing process
we infer the captions and we compare and evaluate these machine generated
caption with human generated captions.
3.1
Training
During training phase we provides pair of input image and its appropriate caption to Show & Tell model. Inception-v3 part of model is trained to identify all
possible objects in an image. While LSTM part of model is trained to predict
every word in the sentence after it has seen image as well as all previous words.
For any given caption we add two additional symbols as start word and stop
word. Whenever stop word is encountered it stop generating sentence and it
marks end of string. Loss function for model is calculated as
L(I, S) = −
N
X
log pt (St ) .
(1)
t=1
where I represent input image and S represent generated caption. N is length
of generated sentence. pt and St represent probability and predicted word at the
time t respectively. During the process of training we will try to minimize this
loss function.
3.2
Inference
From various approaches to generate caption a sentence from given image Show
& Tell model uses Beam Search to find suitable words to generate caption. If
we keep beam size as K, it recursively consider K best word at each output
of the word. At each step it will calculate joint probability of word with all
previously generated word in sequence. It will keep producing the output until
end of sentence marker is predicted. It will select sentence with best probability
and outputs it as caption.
4
Implementation
For evaluation of image captioning model we have implemented Show & Tell
model. Details about dataset,implementation tool and implementation environment is given as follows:
4.1
Datasets
For task of image captioning there are several annotated images dataset are
available. Most common of them are Pascal VOC dataset and MSCOCO Dataset.
In this work MSCOCO image captioning dataset is used. MSCOCO is a dataset
developed by Microsoft with the goal of achieving the state-of-the-art in object
recognition and captioning task. This dataset contains collection of day-to-day
activity with theri related captions. First each object in image is labeled and
after that description is added based on objects in an image. MSCOCO dataset
contains image of around 91 objects types that can be easily recognizable by
even a 4 year old kid. It contains around 2.5 million objects in 328K images.
Dataset is created by using crowdsourcing by thousonds of humans [9].
4.2
Implementation tool and environment
For the implementation of this experiment we have used machine with Intel Xeon
E3 processor with 12 cores and 32GB RAM running CentOS 7. Tensorflow liberary is used for creating and training deep neural networks. Tensorflow is a deep
learning library developed by Google[10]. It provides heterogeneous platform for
execution of algorithms i.e. it can be run on low power devices like mobile as
well as large scale distributed system containing thousands of GPUs. To define
structure of our network tensorflow uses graph definition. Once graph is defined
it can be executed on any supported devices.
5
5.1
Results and Discussion
Results
By the implementation of the Show & Tell model we can able to generate moderately comparable captions with compared to human generated captions. First
of all it model will identify all possible objects in image.
Fig. 2: Generated word vector from Sample Image
As shown in Fig. 2 Inception-v3 model will assign probability of all possible
object in image and convert image into word vector. This word vector is provided
as input to LSTM cells which will then form sentence from this word vector as
shown in Fig. 3 using beam search as described in previous section.
Fig. 3: Generated caption from word vector for Sample Image
5.2
Evaluation Matrices
To evaluating of any model that generate natural language sentence BLEU
(Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) Score is used. It describes how natural sentence is compared to human generated sentence [11]. It is widely used to evaluate
performance of Machine translation. Sentences are compared based on modified
n-gram precision method for generating BLEU score [12]. Where precision is
calculated using following equation:
P
C∈{Candidates}
pn = P
P
C 0 ∈{Candidates}
ngram∈C
P
Countclip (ngram)
ngram0 ∈C 0
Count(ngram0 )
(2)
To evaluate our model we have used image from validation dataset of MSCOCO
Dataset. Some of captions generated by Show & Tell model is shown as follows:
(a) Input image
(b) Generated caption
Fig. 4: Experiment Result
As you can see in Fig. 4, generated sentence is “a woman sitting at a table
with a plate of food.”, while actual human generated sentence are “The young
woman is seated at the table for lunch, holding a hotdog.”, “a woman is eatting
a hotdog at a wooden table.”, “there is a woman holding food at a table.”, “a
young woman holding a sandwich at a table.” and “a woman that is sitting down
holding a hotdog.”. This result in BLEU score of 63 for this image.
(a) Input image
(b) Generated caption
Fig. 5: Experiment Result
Similarly in Fig. 5, generated sentence is “a woman holding a cell phone
in her hand.” while actual human generated sentence are “a woman holding a
Hello Kitty phone on her hands”, “a woman holds up her phone in front of her
face”, “a woman in white shirt holding up a cellphone”, “a woman checking her
cell phone with a hello kitty case” and “the asian girl is holding her miss kitty
phone”. This result in BLEU score of 77 for this image.
While calculating BLEU score of all image in validation dataset we get average score of 65.5. Which shows that our generated sentence are very similar
compared to human generated sentence.
6
Conclusion
We can conclude from our findings that we can combine recent advancement in
Image Labeling and Automatic Machine Translation into an end-to-end hybrid
neural network system. This system is capable to autonomously view an image
and generate a reasonable description in natural language with better accuracy
and naturalness.
References
1. V. Ordonez, G. Kulkarni, and T. L. Berg, “Im2text: Describing images using 1
million captioned photographs,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing
Systems, pp. 1143–1151, 2011.
2. A. Karpathy and L. Fei-Fei, “Deep visual-semantic alignments for generating image
descriptions,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition, pp. 3128–3137, 2015.
3. O. Vinyals, A. Toshev, S. Bengio, and D. Erhan, “Show and tell: Lessons learned
from the 2015 mscoco image captioning challenge,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2016.
4. C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich, “Going deeper with convolutions,” in Proceedings of
the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–9, 2015.
28.
5. C. Szegedy, V. Vanhoucke, S. Ioffe, J. Shlens, and Z. Wojna, “Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.00567, 2015.
37.
6. D. Britz, “Introduction to rnns.” WILDML, http://www.wildml.com/, 2016. [Accessed 4-September-2016].
7. Y. Wu, M. Schuster, Z. Chen, Q. V. Le, M. Norouzi, W. Macherey, M. Krikun,
Y. Cao, Q. Gao, K. Macherey, J. Klingner, A. Shah, M. Johnson, X. Liu, L. Kaiser,
S. Gouws, Y. Kato, T. Kudo, H. Kazawa, K. Stevens, G. Kurian, N. Patil, W. Wang,
C. Young, J. Smith, J. Riesa, A. Rudnick, O. Vinyals, G. Corrado, M. Hughes, and
J. Dean, “Google’s neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between
human and machine translation,” CoRR, vol. abs/1609.08144, 2016.
8. I. Sutskever, O. Vinyals, and Q. V. Le, “Sequence to sequence learning with neural
networks,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 3104–3112,
2014.
9. T.-Y. Lin, M. Maire, S. Belongie, J. Hays, P. Perona, D. Ramanan, P. Dollár,
and C. L. Zitnick, “Microsoft coco: Common objects in context,” in European
Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 740–755, Springer, 2014.
10. M. Abadi, A. Agarwal, P. Barham, E. Brevdo, Z. Chen, C. Citro, G. S. Corrado,
A. Davis, J. Dean, M. Devin, et al., “Tensorflow: Large-scale machine learning on
heterogeneous distributed systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.04467, 2016.
11. K. Papineni, S. Roukos, T. Ward, and W.-J. Zhu, “Bleu: a method for automatic
evaluation of machine translation,” in Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on
association for computational linguistics, pp. 311–318, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002.
12. D. Jurafsky, Speech & language processing. Pearson Education India, 2000.
| 1cs.CV
|
Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Exploration and
Reinforcement Learning
arXiv:1803.08287v1 [cs.SY] 22 Mar 2018
Torsten Koller, Felix Berkenkamp, Matteo Turchetta and Andreas Krause
Abstract— Learning-based methods have been successful in
solving complex control tasks without significant prior knowledge about the system. However, these methods typically do
not provide any safety guarantees, which prevents their use
in safety-critical, real-world applications. In this paper, we
present a learning-based model predictive control scheme that
provides provable high-probability safety guarantees. To this
end, we exploit regularity assumptions on the dynamics in terms
of a Gaussian process prior to construct provably accurate
confidence intervals on predicted trajectories. Unlike previous
approaches, we do not assume that model uncertainties are
independent. Based on these predictions, we guarantee that
trajectories satisfy safety constraints. Moreover, we use a
terminal set constraint to recursively guarantee the existence
of safe control actions at every iteration. In our experiments,
we show that the resulting algorithm can be used to safely and
efficiently explore and learn about dynamic systems.
I. I NTRODUCTION
In model-based reinforcement learning (RL, [1]), we aim
to learn the dynamics of an unknown system from data,
and based on the model, derive a policy that optimizes the
long-term behavior of the system. Crucial to the success of
such methods is the ability to efficiently explore the state
space in order to quickly improve our knowledge about
the system. While empirically successful, current approaches
often use exploratory actions during learning, which lead to
unpredictable and possibly unsafe behavior of the system,
e.g. in exploration approaches based on the optimism in the
face of uncertainty principle [2]. Applying such approaches
to the exploration of a real-world safety-critical system, such
as an autonomous car, is undesirable.
In this paper we introduce S AFE MPC, a safe model
predictive control (MPC) scheme that guarantees the existence of feasible return trajectories to a safe region of the
state space at every time step with high-probability. These
return trajectories are identified through a novel uncertainty
propagation method that, in combination with constrained
MPC, allows for formal safety guarantees in learning control.
Related Work: One area that has considered safety
guarantees is robust MPC. There, we iteratively optimize the
performance along finite-length trajectories at each time step,
based on a known model that incorporates uncertainties and
disturbances acting on the system [3]. In a constrained robust
This work was supported by SNSF grant 200020 159557, a fellowship
within the FITweltweit program of the German Academic Exchange Service
(DAAD), and the Max Planck ETH Center for Learning Systems
Torsten Koller is with the Department of Computer Science, University
of Freiburg, Germany. Email: [email protected]
Felix Berkenkamp, Matteo Turchetta and Andreas Krause are with the
Learning & Adaptive Systems Group, Department of Computer Science,
ETH Zurich, Switzerland. Email: {befelix, matteotu, krausea}@inf.ethz.ch
Fig. 1. Propagation of uncertainty over multiple time steps based on a wellcalibrated statistical model of the unknown system. We iteratively compute
ellipsoidal over-approximations (purple) of the intractable image (green) of
the learned model for uncertain ellipsoidal inputs.
MPC setting, we optimize these local trajectories under
additional state and control constraints. Safety is typically
defined in terms of recursive feasibility and robust constraint
satisfaction. In [4], this definition is used to safely control
urban traffic flow, while [5] guarantees safety by switching
between a standard and a safety mode. However, these
methods are conservative since they do not update the model.
In contrast, learning-based MPC approaches (LBMPC,
[6]) adapt their models online based on observations of the
system. This allows the controller to improve over time,
given limited prior knowledge of the system. Theoretical
safety guarantees in LBMPC are established in [6], which
enforces robust feasibility and constraint satisfaction with
learned statistical models. However, the model errors are
assumed to be deterministically bounded in a polytope and
it is not clear how to obtain this outer bound in the first
place. MPC based on Gaussian process (GP, [7]) models is
proposed in a number of works, e.g. [8], [9]. The difficulty
here is that trajectories have complex dependencies on states
and unbounded stochastic uncertainties. Safety through probabilistic chance constraints is considered in [10] and [11]
based on approximate uncertainty propagation. While often
being empirically successful, these approaches do not theoretically guarantee safety of the underlying system.
Another area that has considered learning for control is
model-based RL. There, we aim to learn global policies
based on data-driven modeling techniques, e.g., by explicitly
trading-off between finding locally optimal closed-loop policies (exploitation) and learning the behavior of the system
globally through exploration [1]. This results in data-efficient
learning of policies in unknown systems [12]. In contrast to
MPC, where we optimize finite-length trajectories, in RL
we typically aim to find an infinite horizon optimal policy.
Hence, enforcing hard constraints in RL is challenging.
Control-theoretic safety properties such as Lyapunov stability
or robust constraint satisfaction are only considered in a
few works [13]. In [14], safety is guaranteed by optimizing
parametric policies under stability constraints, while [15]
guarantees safety in terms of constraint satisfaction through
reachability analysis.
Our Contribution: We combine ideas from robust
control and GP-based RL to design a MPC scheme that
recursively guarantees the existence of a safety trajectory
that satisfies the constraints of the system. In contrast to
previous approaches, we use a novel uncertainty propagation
technique that can reliably propagate the confidence intervals of a GP-model forward in time. We use results from
statistical learning theory to guarantee that these trajectories
contain the system with high probability jointly for all time
steps. In combination with a constrained MPC approach
with a terminal set constraint, we then prove the safety of
the system. We apply the algorithm to safely explore the
dynamics of an inverted pendulum simulation.
II. P ROBLEM S TATEMENT
We consider a nonlinear, discrete-time dynamical system
xt+1 = f (xt , ut ) = h(xt , ut ) + g(xt , ut ) ,
| {z } | {z }
prior model
(1)
unknown error
where xt ∈ Rnx is the state and ut ∈ Rnu is the control
input to the system at time step t ∈ N. We assume that
we have access to a twice continuously differentiable prior
model h(xt , ut ), which could be based on a first principles
physics model. The model error g(xt , ut ) is a priori unknown and we use a statistical model to learn it by collecting
observations from the system during operation. In order to
provide guarantees, we need reliable estimates of the modelerror. In general, this is impossible for arbitrary functions g.
We make the following additional regularity assumptions.
assume that the model-error g is of the form g(z) =
PWe
∞
nx
α
× Rn u , a
i=0 i k(z, zi ), αi ∈ R, z = (x, u) ∈ R
weighted sum of distances between inputs z and representer
points zi = (xi , ui ) ∈ Rnx × Rnu as defined through a
symmetric, positive definite kernel k. This class of functions
is well-behaved in the sense that they form a reproducing
kernel Hilbert space (RKHS, [16]) Hk equipped with an
inner-product h·, ·ik . The induced norm ||g||2k = hg, gik
is a measure of the complexity of a function g ∈ Hk .
Consequently, the following assumption can be interpreted
as a requirement on the smoothness of the model-error g
w.r.t the kernel k.
Assumption 1 The unknown function g has bounded norm
in the RKHS Hk , induced by the continuously differentiable
kernel k, i.e. ||g||k ≤ Bg .
In the case of a multi-dimensional output nx > 1, we follow
[17] and redefine g as a single-output function g̃ such that
g̃(·, i) = gi (·) and assume that ||g̃||k ≤ Bg .
We further assume that the system is subject to polytopic
state and control constraints
X = {x ∈ Rnx |Hx x ≤ hx , hx ∈ Rmx },
U = {u ∈ R
nu
u
|Hu u ≤ h , hu ∈ R
mu
},
(2)
(3)
which are bounded. For example, in an autonomous driving
scenario, the state region could correspond to a highway lane
and the control constraints could represent the physical limits
on acceleration and steering angle of the car.
Lastly, we assume access to a backup controller that guarantees that we remain inside a given safe subset of the state
space once we enter it. In the autonomous driving example,
this could be a simple linear controller that stabilizes the car
in a small region in the center of the lane at slow speeds.
Assumption 2 We are given a controller πsafe (·) and a
polytopic safe region
Xsafe := {x ∈ Rnx |Hs x ≤ hs } ⊂ X ,
(4)
which is (robust) control positive invariant (RCPI) under πsafe (·). Moreover, the controller satisfies the control
constraints inside Xsafe , i.e. πsafe (x) ∈ U ∀x ∈ Xsafe .
This assumption allows us to gather initial data from the
system inside the safe region even in the presence of significant model errors, since the system remains safe under the
controller πsafe . Moreover, we can still guarantee constraint
satisfaction asymptotically outside of Xsafe , if we can show
that a finite sequence of control inputs eventually steers
the system back to the safe set Xsafe . In principle, it is
sufficient that we have an arbitrary convex and bounded
RCPI set XRCPI ⊂ X . This set can be inner-approximated
by the safety polytope Xsafe to arbitrary precision [18].
Given a controller π, ideally we want to enforce the stateand control constraints at every time step,
∀t ∈ N : fπ (xt ) ∈ X , π(xt ) ∈ U,
(5)
where xt+1 = fπ (xt ) = f (xt , π(xt )) denotes the closedloop system under π. However, due to limited knowledge of
the system, it is in general impossible to design a controller
that enforces (5) without additional assumptions. Instead, we
slightly relax this requirement to safety with high probability.
Definition 1 Let π : Rnx → Rnu be a controller for (1)
with the corresponding closed-loop system fπ . Let x0 ∈ X
and δ ∈ (0, 1]. A system is δ−safe under the controller π iff:
Pr [ ∀t ∈ N : fπ (xt ) ∈ X , π(xt ) ∈ U] ≥ 1 − δ.
(6)
Based on Definition 1, the goal is to design a control
scheme that guarantees δ-safety of the system (1). At the
same time, we want to improve our model by learning from
observations during operation, which increase the performance of the controller over time.
III. BACKGROUND
In this section, we introduce the necessary background on
GPs and set-theoretic properties of ellipsoids that we need to
model our system and perform multi-step ahead predictions.
A. Gaussian Processes (GPs)
We want to learn the unknown model-error g from data
using a GP model. A GP(m, k) is a distribution over functions, which is fully specified through a mean function m :
Rd → R and a covariance function k : Rd × Rd → R,
where d = nx + nu . Given a set of noisy observations
yi = f (zi ) + wi , wi ∼ N (0, λ2 ), i = 1, . . . , n, we choose a
zero-mean prior on g as m ≡ 0 and regard the differences
ỹn = [y1 − h(z1 ), . . . , yn − h(zn )]T between prior model
h and observed system response at input locations Z =
[z1 , .., zn ]T . The posterior distribution at z is then given as
a Gaussian N (µn (z), σn2 (z)) with mean and variance
µn (z) = kn (z)T [Kn + λ2 In ]−1 ỹn
σn2 (z)
T
(7)
2
−1
= k(z, z) − kn (z) [Kn + λ In ]
kn (z),
(8)
where [Kn ]ij = k(zi , zj ), [kn (z)]j = k(z, zj ), and In is
the n−dimensional identity matrix. In the case of multiple
outputs nx > 1, we model each output dimension with an
independent GP, GP(mj , kj ), j = 1, .., nx . We then redefine
(7) and (8) as µn (·) = (µn,1 (·), .., µn,nx (·)) and σn (·) =
(σn,1 (·), .., σn,nx (·)) corresponding to the predictive mean
and variance functions of the individual models.
Based on Assumption 1, we can use GPs to model the
unknown part of the system (1), which provides us with
reliable confidence intervals on the model-error g.
Lemma 1 [14, Lemma 2]: Assume ||g||k ≤ Bg and
that measurements are
pcorrupted by λ-sub-Gaussian noise.
Let βn = Bg + 4λ γn + 1 + ln(1/δ), where γn is the
information capacity associated with the kernel k. Then with
probability at least 1−δ we have for all i = 1 ≤ i ≤ nx , z ∈
X × U that |µn−1,i (z) − gi (z)| ≤ βn · σn−1,i (z).
In combination with the prior model h(z), this allows
us to construct reliable confidence intervals around the
true dynamics of the system (1). The scaling βn depends on the number of data points n that we gather
from the system through the information capacity, γn =
maxA⊂Z̃,|A|=ñ I(g̃A ; g), Z̃ = X × U × I, ñ = n · nx , i.e. the
maximum mutual information between a finite set of samples
A and the function g. Exact evaluation of γn is in general NPhard, but γn can be greedily approximated and has sublinear
dependence on n for many commonly used kernels [19].
The regularity assumption 1 on our model-error and the
smoothness assumption on the covariance function k additionally imply that the function g is Lipschitz.
Lemma 2 [20, Lemma 2]: Let g have bounded RKHS norm
||g||k ≤ Bg induced by a continuously differentiable kernel
k. Then g is Lg -Lipschitz continuous.
B. Ellipsoids
We use ellipsoids to give an outer bound on the uncertainty
of our system when making multi-step ahead predictions.
Due to appealing geometric properties, ellipsoids are widely
used in the robust control community to compute reachable sets [21], [22]. These sets intuitively provide an outer
approximation on the next state of a system considering
all possible realizations of uncertainties when applying a
controller to the system at a given set-valued input. We
briefly review some of these properties and refer to [23] for
an exhaustive introduction to ellipsoids and to the derivations
for the following properties.
We use the basic definition of an ellipsoid,
E(p, Q) := {x ∈ Rn |(x − p)T Q−1 (x − p) ≤ 1},
(9)
with center p ∈ R and a symmetric positive definite (s.p.d)
shape matrix Q ∈ Rn×n . Ellipsoids are invariant under affine
subspace transformations such that for A ∈ Rn×r , r ≤ n
with full column rank and b ∈ Rr , we have that
n
A · E(p, Q) + b = E(p + b, AQAT ).
(10)
The Minkowski sum E(p1 , Q1 ) ⊕ E(p2 , Q2 ), i.e. the pointwise sum between two arbitrary ellipsoids, is in general not
an ellipsoids anymore, but we have that
E(p1 , Q1 )⊕E(p2 , Q2 ) ⊂ E p1 +p2 , (1+c−1 )Q1 +(1+c)Q2
(11)
for all c > 0. Moreover, the minimizer of the trace of
the resulting shape matrix is analytically given as c =
p
T r(Q1 )/T r(Q2 ). A particular problem that we encounter
is finding the maximum distance r to the center of an
ellipsoid E := E(0, Q) under a special transformation, i.e.
r(Q, S) =
max ||S(x − p)||2 ,
x∈E(p,Q)
(12)
where S ∈ Rm×n with full column rank. We show in the
appendix that this is a generalized eigenvalue problem of the
pair (Q, S T S) and the optimizer is given as the square-root
of the largest generalized eigenvalue.
IV. S AFE M ODEL P REDICTIVE C ONTROL
In this section, we use the assumptions in Sec. II to design
a control scheme that fulfills our safety requirements in Definition 1. We construct reliable, multi-step ahead predictions
based on our GP model and use MPC to actively optimize
over these predicted trajectories under safety constraints.
Using Assumption 2, we use a terminal set constraint to
theoretically prove the safety of our method.
A. Multi-step Ahead Predictions
From Lemma 1 and our prior model h(xt , ut ), we directly
obtain high-probability confidence intervals on f (xt , ut )
uniformly for all t ∈ N. We extend this to over-approximate
the system after a sequence of inputs (ut , ut+1 , ..). The result
is a sequence of set-valued confidence regions that contain
the true dynamics of the system with high probability.
a) One-step ahead predictions: We compute an ellipsoidal confidence region that contains the next state of the
system with high probability when applying a control input,
given that the current state is contained in an ellipsoid. In order to approximate the system, we linearize our prior model
h(xt , ut ) and use the affine transformation property (10) to
compute the ellipsoidal next state of the linearized model.
Next, we approximate the unknown model-error g(xt , ut )
using the confidence intervals of our GP model. We finally
input u ∈ Rnu , by over-approximating the output of the
system f (R, u) = {f (x, u)|x ∈ R} for ellipsoidal inputs R.
Here, we choose p as the linearization center of the state and
choose ū = u, i.e. z̄ = (p, u). Since the function f˜µ is affine,
we can make use of (10) to compute
Fig. 2. Decomposition of the over-approximated image of the system (1)
under an ellipsoidal input R0 . The exact, unknown image of f (right,
green area) is approximated by the linearized model f˜µ (center, top)
˜ which accounts for the confidence interval
and the remainder term d,
and the linearization errors of the approximation (center, bottom). The
resulting ellipsoid R1 is given by the Minkowski sum of the two individual
approximations.
f˜µ (R, u) = E(h(z̄) + µ(z̄), AQAT ),
resulting again in an ellipsoid. This is visualized in Fig. 2
by the upper ellipsoid in the center. To upper-bound the
confidence hyper-rectangle on the right hand side of (21),
we upper-bound the term kz − z̄k2 by
l(R, u) :=
apply Lipschitz arguments to outer-bound the approximation
errors. We sum up these individual approximations, which
result in an ellipsoidal approximation of the next state of
the system. This is illustrated in Fig. 2. We formally derive
the necessary equations in the following paragraphs. The
reader may choose to skip the technical details of these
approximations, which result in Lemma 3.
We first regard the system f in (1) for a single input vector
z = (x, u), f (z) = h(z) + g(z). We linearly approximate f
around z̄ = (x̄, ū) via
f (z) ≈ h(z̄) + Jh (z̄)(z − z̄) + g(z̄) = f˜(z),
(13)
where Jh (z̄) = [A, B] is the Jacobian of h at z̄.
Next, we use the Lagrangian remainder theorem [24] on
the linearization of h and apply a continuity argument on
our locally constant approximation of g. This results in an
upper-bound on the approximation error,
L∇h,i
||z − z̄||22 + Lg ||z − z̄||2 , (14)
|fi (z) − f˜i (z)| ≤
2
where fi (z) is the ith component of f , 1 ≤ i ≤ nx , L∇h,i
is the Lipschitz constant of the gradient ∇hi , and Lg is the
Lipschitz constant of g, which is defined through Lemma 2.
The function f˜ depends on the unknown model error g. We
approximate g with the statistical GP model, µ(z̄) ≈ g(z̄).
From Lemma 1 we have
|gi (z̄) − µn,i (z̄)| ≤ βn σn,i (z̄), 1 ≤ i ≤ nx ,
(15)
with high probability. We combine (14) and (15) to obtain
L∇h,i
|fi (z) − f˜µ(z),i | ≤ βn σi (z̄) +
||z − z̄||22 + Lg ||z − z̄||2 ,
2
(16)
where 1 ≤ i ≤ nx and
f˜µ (z) = h(z̄t ) + Jh (z̄t )(z − z¯t ) + µn (z̄).
(17)
We can interpret (16) as the edges of the confidence hyperrectangle
L∇h
m̃(z) = f˜µ (z) ± [βn σn−1 (z̄) +
||z − z̄||22 + Lg ||z − z̄||2 ],
2
(18)
where L∇h = [L∇h,1 , .., L∇h,nx ] and we use the shorthand
notation a ± b := [a1 ± b1 ] × [anx ± bnx ], a, b ∈ Rnx .
We are now ready to compute a confidence region based
on an ellipsoidal state R = E(p, Q) ⊂ Rnx and a fixed
(19)
max
z(x)=(x,u),
x∈R
||z(x) − z̄||2 ,
(20)
which leads to
˜ u) = βn σn−1 (z̄) + L∇h l2 (R, u)/2 + Lg l(R, u). (21)
d(R,
Due to our choice of z, z̄, we have that ||z(x) − z̄||2 =
||x − p||2 and we can use (12) to get l(R, u) = r(Q, Inx ),
which corresponds to the largest eigenvalue of Q−1 . Using
(20), we can now over-approximate the right side of (21) for
inputs R by an ellipsoid
˜ u) ⊂ E(0, Q ˜(R, u)),
0 ± d(R,
d
(22)
where we obtain Qd˜(R, u) by over-approximating the hyper˜ u) with the ellipsoid E(0, Q ˜(R, u)) through
rectangle d(R,
d
√
a ± b ⊂ E(a, nx · diag([b1 , .., bnx ])), ∀a, b ∈ Rnx . This
is illustrated in Fig. 2 by the lower ellipsoid in the center.
Combining the previous results, we can compute the final
over-approximation using (11),
R+ = m̃(R, u) = f˜µ (R, u) ⊕ E(0, Qd˜(R, u)).
(23)
Since we carefully incorporated all approximation errors and
extended the confidence intervals around our model predictions to set-valued inputs, we get the following generalization
of Lemma 1.
Lemma 3 Let δ ∈ (0, 1] and choose βn as in Lemma 1.
Then, with probability greater than 1 − δ, we have that:
∀x ∈ R : f (x, u) ∈ m̃(R, u),
(24)
uniformly for all R = E(p, Q) ⊂ X , u ∈ U.
Proof: Define m(x, u) = h(x, u)+µn (x, u)±βn σn−1 +
n(x, u). From Lemma
1 we have ∀SR ⊂ X , u ∈ U that, with
S
high probability, x∈R f (x, u)S⊂ x∈R m(x, u). Due to the
over-approximations, we have x∈R m(x, u) ⊂ m̃(R, u).
Lemma 3 allows us to compute confidence ellipsoid
around the next state of the system, given that the current
state of the system is given through an ellipsoidal belief.
b) Multi-step ahead predictions: We now use the previous results to compute a sequence of ellipsoids that contain a
trajectory of the system with high-probability, by iteratively
applying the one-step ahead predictions (23).
Given an initial ellipsoid R0 ⊂ Rnx and control input
ut ∈ U, we iteratively compute confidence ellipsoids as
Rt+1 = m̃(Rt , ut ).
(25)
We can directly apply Lemma 3 to get the following result.
Corollary 1 Let δ ∈ (0, 1] and choose βn as in Lemma 1.
Choose x0 ∈ R0 ⊂ X . Then the following holds jointly for
all t ≥ 0 with probability at least 1 − δ: xt ∈ Rt , where
zt = (xt , ut ) ∈ X × U, R0 , R1 , .. is computed as in (25) and
xt is the state of the system (1) at time step t.
Proof: Since Lemma 3 holds uniformly for all ellipsoids R ⊂ X and u ∈ U, this is a special case that
holds uniformly for all control inputs ut , t ∈ N and for all
ellipsoids Rt , t ∈ N obtained through (25).
Corollary 1 guarantees that, with high probability, the
system is always contained in the propagated belief (25).
Thus, if we provide safety guarantees for the propagated
belief, we obtain high-probability safety guarantees for the
trajectories of (1).
c) Predictions under state-feedback control laws:
When applying multi-step ahead predictions under a sequence of feed-forward inputs ut ∈ X , the individual sets of
the corresponding reachability sequence can quickly grow
unreasonably large. This is because these open loop input
sequences do not account for future control inputs that could
correct deviations from the model predictions. Hence, we
extend (23) to affine state-feedback control laws of the form
πt (xt ) := Kt (xt − pt ) + ut ,
(26)
where Kt ∈ Rnu ×nx is a feedback matrix and ut ∈ Rnu is
the open-loop input. The parameter pt is determined through
the center of the current ellipsoid Rt = E(pt , Qt ). Given an
appropriate choice of Kt , the control law actively contracts
the ellipsoids towards their center. Similar to the derivations
(13)-(23), we can compute the function m̃ for affine feedback
controllers (26) πt and ellipsoids Rt = E(pt , Qt ). The
resulting ellipsoid is
m̃(Rt , πt ) = E(h(z̄t )+µ(z̄t ), Ht Qt HtT )⊕E(0, Qd˜(Rt , πt )),
(27)
where z¯t = (pt , ut ) and Ht = At + Bt Kt . The set
E(0, Qd˜(Rt , πt )) is obtained similarly to (20) as the ellipsoidal over-approximation of
0 ± [βn σ(z̄) + L∇h
l2 (Rt , St )
+ Lg l(Rt , St )],
2
(28)
with St = [Inx , KtT ] and l(Rt , St ) = maxx∈Rt ||St (z(x) −
z¯t )||2 . The theoretical results of Lemma 3 and Corollary 1
directly apply to the case of the uncertainty propagation
technique (27).
B. Safety constraints
The derived multi-step ahead prediction technique provides a sequence of ellipsoidal confidence regions around
trajectories of the true system f through Corollary 1. We
can guarantee that the system is safe by verifying that
the computed confidence ellipsoids are contained inside the
polytopic constraints (2) and (3). That is, given a sequence
of feedback controllers πt , t = 0, .., T − 1 we need to verify
Rt+1 ⊂ X , πt (Rt ) ⊂ U, t = 0, .., T − 1,
(29)
where (R0 , .., RT ) is given through (25).
Since our constraints are polytopes, we have that X =
Tm
x
nx
x
i=1 Xi , Xi = {x ∈ R |[Hx ]i,· x − hi ≤ 0}, where
x
[Hx ]i,· is the ith row of H . We can now formulate the state
constraints through the condition Rt = E(pt , Qt ) ⊂ X as
mx individual constraints Rt ⊂ Xi , i = 1, .., mx , for which
an analytical formulation exists [25],
q
[Hx ]i,· pt + [Hx ]i,· Qt [Hx ]Ti,· ≤ hxi , ∀i ∈ {1, .., mx }. (30)
Moreover, we can use the fact that πt is affine in x to
obtain πt (Rt ) = E(kt , Kt Qt , KtT ), using (10). The corresponding control constraint πt (Rt ) ⊂ U is then equivalently
given by
q
u
[Hu ]i,· ut + [Hu ]i,· Kt Qt KtT [Hu ]T
i,· ≤ hi , ∀i ∈ {1, .., mu }.
(31)
C. The SafeMPC algorithm
Based on the previous results, we formulate a MPC
scheme that optimizes the long-term performance of our
system, while satisfying the safety condition in Definition 1:
minimize
Jt (R0 , .., RT )
(32a)
subject to
Rt+1 = m̃(Rt , πt ), t = 0, .., T − 1
(32b)
πt (Rt ) ⊂ U, t = 0, .., T − 1
(32d)
π0 ,..,πT −1
Rt ⊂ X , t = 1, .., T − 1
RT ⊂ Xsafe ,
(32c)
(32e)
where R0 := {xt } is the current state of the system and
the intermediate state and control constraints are defined in
(30), (31). The terminal set constraint RT ⊂ Xsafe has the
same form as (30) and can be formulated accordingly. The
objective Jt can be chosen to suit the given control task.
Due to the terminal constraint RT ⊂ Xsafe , a solution to
(32) provides a sequence of feedback controllers π0 , .., πT
that steer the system back to the safe set Xsafe . We cannot
directly show that a solution to MPC problem (32) exists
at every time step (this property is known as recursive
feasibility) without imposing additional assumption, e.g. on
the safety controller πsafe . However, we guarantee that such
a sequence of feedback controllers exists at every time step
through Algorithm 1 as follows: Given a feasible solution
Πt = (πt0 , .., πtT −1 ) to (32) at time t, we apply the first feedback control πt0 . In case we do not find a feasible solution to
(32) at the next time step, we shift the previous solution in a
receding horizon fashion and append πsafe to the sequence to
obtain Πt+1 = (πt1 , .., πtT −1 , πsafe ). We repeat this process
until a new feasible solution exists that replaces the previous
input sequence. We now state the main result of the paper
that guarantees the safety of our system under Algorithm 1.
Theorem 2 Let π be the controller defined through algorithm 1 and x0 ∈ Xsafe . Then the system (1) is δ−safe under
the controller π.
Proof: By induction. Base case: If (32) is infeasible, we
are δ-safe using the backup controller πsafe of Assumption 2,
Algorithm 1 Safe Model Predictive Control (S AFE MPC)
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
Input: Safe policy πsafe , dynamics model h, statistical
model GP(0, k).
Π0 ← {πsafe , .., πsafe } with |Π0 | = T
for t = 0, 1, .. do
Jt ← objective from high-level planner
feasible, Π ← solve MPC problem (32)
if feasible then
Πt ← Π
else
Πt ← (Πt−1,1:T −1 , πsafe )
xt+1 ← apply ut = Πt,0 (xt ) to the system (1)
since x0 ∈ Xsafe . Otherwise the controller returned from (32)
is δ-safe as a consequence of Corollary 1 and the terminal set
constraint that leads to xt+T ∈ Xsafe . Induction step: let the
previous controller πt be δ-safe. At time step t + 1, if (34) is
infeasible then Πt leads to a state xt+T ∈ Xsafe , from which
the backup-controller is δ-safe by Assumption 2. If (34) is
feasible, then the return path is δ-safe by Corollary 1.
D. Optimizing long-term behavior
In MPC, we aim to optimize the long-term behavior of
our system based on finite-length trajectories. In contrast,
the S AFE MPC algorithm guarantees the existence of return
strategies. This is undesirable in exploration scenarios, where
one aims to explore uncertain areas of the state space. In
order to optimize the long-term behavior of the system
while maintaining the safety properties of our algorithm,
we propose to simultaneously plan a performance trajectory
perf
s0 , .., sH under a sequence of inputs π0perf , .., πH−1
using
a performance-model mperf along with the return strategy
that we obtain when solving (32). We do not make any
assumptions on the performance model and could be given
by one of the approximate uncertainty propagation methods
proposed in the literature (see, e.g. [10] for an overview).
In order to maintain the safety of our system, we enforce
that the first r ∈ {1, ., min{T, H}} controls are the same for
both trajectories, i.e. we have that πk = πkperf , k = 0, .., r−1.
This extended MPC problem is
minimize
πt ,..,πt+T −1
perf
πtperf ,..,πt+H−1
subject to
Jt (st , .., st+H )
(32b) − (32e), t = 0, .., T − 1
st+1 = mperf (st , πtperf ), t = 0, .., H − 1
πt = πtperf , t = 0, .., r − 1,
(33)
where we replace (32) with this problem in Algorithm 1.
The safety guarantees of Theorem 2 directly translate to this
setting, since we can always fall back to the return strategy.
E. Discussion
Algorithm 1 theoretically guarantees that the system remains safe, while actively optimizing for performance via
the MPC problem (33). This problem can be solved by
commonly used, nonlinear programming (NLP) solvers, such
as the Interior Point OPTimizer (Ipopt, [26]). Due to the
solution of the eigenvalue problem (12) that is required
to compute (23), our uncertainty propagation scheme is
not analytic. However, we can still obtain exact function
values and derivative information by means of algorithmic
differentiation, which is at the core of many state-of-the-art
optimization software libraries [27].
One way to further reduce the conservatism of the multistep ahead predictions is to linearize the GP mean prediction
µn (xt , ut ), which we omitted for clarity.
V. E XPERIMENTS
In this section, we evaluate the proposed S AFE MPC
algorithm to safely explore the dynamics of an inverted
pendulum system.
The continuous-time dynamics of the pendulum are given
by ml2 θ̈ = gml sin(θ) − η θ̇ + u, where m = 0.15kg
and l = 0.5m are the mass and length of the pendulum,
respectively, η = 0.1Nms/rad is a friction parameter, and
g = 9.81m/s2 is the gravitational constant. The state of the
system x = (θ, θ̇) consists of the angle θ and angular velocity
θ̇ of the pendulum. The system is controlled by a torque u
that is applied to the pendulum. The origin of the system
corresponds to the pendulum standing upright.
The system is underactuated with control constraints U =
{u ∈ R| − 1 ≤ u ≤ 1}. Due to these limits, the pendulum
becomes unstable and falls down beyond a certain angle.
We do not impose state constraints, X = R2 . However the
terminal set constraint (32e) of the MPC problem (32) acts as
a stability constraint and prevents the pendulum from falling.
As in [14], our prior model h consists of a linearized and
discretized approximation to the true system with a lower
mass and neglected friction. The safety controller πsafe is
a discrete-time, infinite horizon linear quadratic regulator
(LQR, [28]) of the approximated system h with cost matrices
Q = diag([1, 2]), R = 20. The corresponding safety
region XSafe is given by a conservative polytopic innerapproximation of the true region of attraction of πsafe . We
use the same mixture of linear and Matérn kernel functions
for both output dimensions, albeit with different hyperparameters. We initially train our model with a dataset (Z0 , ỹ0 )
sampled inside the safe set using the backup controller
πSafe . That is, we gather n0 = 25 initial samples Z0 =
{z10 , .., zn0 0 } with zi0 = (xi , πsafe (xi )), xi ∈ Xsafe , i = 1, .., n
and observed next states ỹ0 = {y00 , .., yn0 0 } ⊂ XSafe .
The theoretical choice of the scaling parameter βn for the
confidence intervals in Lemma 1 can be conservative and we
choose a fixed value of βn = 2 instead.
We aim to iteratively collect the most informative samples
of the system, while preserving its safety. To evaluate the
exploration performance, we use the mutual information
I(gZn , g) between the collected samples Zn = {z0 , .., zn } ∪
Z0 and the GP prior on the unknown model-error g, which
can be computed in closed-form [19].
1
1
0
0
0
−1
−1
−1
−1.0
−0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Angular velocity θ̇
−1.0
−0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
−1.0
Angular velocity θ̇
300
200
100
−0.5
0.0
0.5
Iteration
Angle θ
1
1.0
Angular velocity θ̇
Fig. 3. Visualization of the samples acquired in the static exploration setting in Sec. V-A for T ∈ {1, 4, 5}. The algorithm plans informative paths to the
safe set Xsafe (red polytope in the center). The baseline sample set for T = 1 (left) is dense around origin of the system. For T = 4 (center) we get the
optimal trade-off between cautiousness due to a long horizon and limited length of the return trajectory due to a short horizon. The exploration for T = 5
(right) is too cautious, since the propagated uncertainty at the final state is too large.
For a first experiment, we assume that the system is static,
so that we can reset the system to an arbitrary state xn ∈ R2
in every iteration. In the static case and without terminal set
constraints, a provably close-to-optimal exploration strategy
is to, at each iteration n, select state-action pair zn+1 with
the largest predictive standard deviation [19]
X
zn+1 = arg max
σn,j (z),
(34)
z∈X ×U
1≤j≤nx
where
is the predictive variance (8) of the ith
GP(0, ki ) at the nth iteration. Inspired by this, at each
iteration we collect samples by solving
Pnxthe MPC problem
(32) with cost function Jn = − i=1
σn,i , where we
additionally optimize over the initial state xn ∈ X . Hence,
we visit high-uncertainty states, but only allow for stateaction pairs zn that are part of a feasible return trajectory
to the safe set XSafe .
Since optimizing the initial state is highly non-convex, we
solve the problem iteratively with 25 random initializations to
obtain a good approximation of the global minimizer. After
every iteration, we update the sample set Zn+1 = Zn ∪{zn },
collect an observation (zn , yn ) and update the GP models.
We apply this procedure for varying horizon lengths.
The resulting sample sets are visualized for varying horizon lengths T ∈ {1, .., 5} with 300 iterations in Fig. 3, while
Fig. 4 shows how the mutual information of the sample sets
Zi , i = 0, .., n for the different values of T . For short time
horizons (T = 1), the algorithm can only slowly explore,
since it can only move one step outside of the safe set. This is
also reflected in the mutual information gained, which levels
off quickly. For a horizon length of T = 4, the algorithm
is able to explore a larger part of the state-space, which
means that more information is gained. For larger horizons,
the predictive uncertainty of the final state is too large to
explore effectively, which slows down exploration initially,
when we do not have much information about our system.
The results suggest that our approach could further benefit
from adaptively choosing the horizon during operation, e.g.
by employing a variable horizon MPC approach [29], or by
carefully monitoring when the mutual information starts to
saturate for the current horizon.
2
σn,i
(·)
I(gZn , g)
A. Static Exploration
100
50
T=1
T=2
0
50
100
Iteration
T=3
T=4
150
T=5
200
Fig. 4. Mutual information I(gZn , g), n = 1, .., 200 for horizon lengths
T ∈ {1, .., 5}. Exploration settings with shorter horizon gather more
informative samples at the beginning, but less informative samples in the
long run. Longer horizon lengths result in less informative samples at
the beginning, due to uncertainties being propagated over long horizons.
However, after having gathered some knowledge they quickly outperform
the smaller horizon settings. The best trade off is found for T = 4.
B. Dynamic Exploration
As a second experiment, we collect informative samples during operation; without resetting the system at
every iteration. Starting at x0 ∈ Xsafe , we apply the
S AFE MPC,Algorithm 1, over 200 iterations. We consider
two settings. In the first, we solve the MPC problem (32)
with −Jn given by (34), similar to the previous experiments.
In the second setting, we additionally plan a performance
trajectory as proposed in Sec. IV-D. We define the states of
the performance trajectory as Gaussians st = N (mt , St ) ∈
Rnx × Rnx ×nx and the next state is given by the predictive
mean and variance of the current state mt and applied action
ut . That is, st+1 = N(mt+1 , St+1 ) with
mt+1 = µn (mt , ut ), St+1 = Σn (mt , ut ), t = 0, .., H − 1,
(35)
where Σn (·) = diag(σn2 (·)) and m0 = xn . This simple
approximation technique is known as mean-equivalent uncertainty propagation. We define the cost-function −Jt =
PH
PT
1/2
T
t=1 (mt − pt ) Qperf (mt − pt ), which
t=0 trace(St ) +
maximizes the confidence intervals along the trajectory
s1 , .., sH , while penalizing deviation from the safety trajectory. We choose r = 1 in the problem (33), i.e. the first
action of the safety trajectory and performance trajectory are
the same. As in the static setting, we update our GP models
after every iteration.
I(gZ200 , g)
150
100
50
0
T=1
T=2
T=3
T=4
T=5
Fig. 5. Comparison of the information gathered from the system after 200
iterations for the standard setting (blue) and the setting where we plan an
additional performance trajectory (green).
We evaluate both settings for varying T ∈ {1, .., 5} and
fixed H = 5 in terms of their mutual information in Fig. 5.
We observe a similar behavior as in the static exploration
experiments and get the best exploration performance for
T = 4 with a slight degradation of performance for T = 5.
We can see that, except for T = 1, the performance trajectory
decomposition setting consistently outperforms the standard
setting. Planning a performance trajectory (green) provides
the algorithm with an additional degree of freedom, which
leads to drastically improved exploration performance.
VI. C ONCLUSION
We introduced S AFE MPC, a learning-based MPC scheme
that can safely explore partially unknown systems. The algorithm is based on a novel uncertainty propagation technique
that uses a reliable statistical model of the system. As we
gather more data from the system and update our statistical
mode, the model becomes more accurate and control performance improves, all while maintaining safety guarantees
throughout the learning process.
R EFERENCES
[1] R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto, “Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 9, no. 5, pp.
1054–1054, 1998.
[2] C. Xie, S. Patil, T. Moldovan, S. Levine, and P. Abbeel, “Modelbased reinforcement learning with parametrized physical models and
optimism-driven exploration,” in In Proc. of the IEEE International
Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2016, pp. 504–511.
[3] J. B. Rawlings and D. Q. Mayne, Model Predictive Control: Theory
and Design. Nob Hill Pub., 2009.
[4] S. Sadraddini and C. Belta, “A provably correct MPC approach
to safety control of urban traffic networks,” in American Control
Conference (ACC), 2016, pp. 1679–1684.
[5] J. M. Carson, B. Açıkmeşe, R. M. Murray, and D. G. MacMartin, “A
robust model predictive control algorithm augmented with a reactive
safety mode,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1251–1260, 2013.
[6] A. Aswani, H. Gonzalez, S. S. Sastry, and C. Tomlin, “Provably
safe and robust learning-based model predictive control,” Automatica,
vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1216–1226, 2013.
[7] C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. Williams, Gaussian Processes for Machine
Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 2006.
[8] J. Kocijan, R. Murray-Smith, C. E. Rasmussen, and A. Girard,
“Gaussian process model based predictive control,” in In Proc. of the
American Control Conference (ACC), vol. 3, 2004, pp. 2214–2219
vol.3.
[9] G. Cao, E. M.-K. Lai, and F. Alam, “Gaussian process model predictive control of an unmanned quadrotor,” Journal of Intelligent &
Robotic Systems, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 147–162, 2017.
[10] L. Hewing and M. N. Zeilinger, “Cautious model predictive control
using Gaussian process regression,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.10702,
2017.
[11] C. J. Ostafew, A. P. Schoellig, and T. D. Barfoot, “Robust constrained
learning-based NMPC enabling reliable mobile robot path tracking,”
The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 35, no. 13, pp.
1547–1563, 2016.
[12] M. P. Deisenroth and C. E. Rasmussen, “PILCO: A model-based and
data-efficient approach to policy search,” in In Proceedings of the
International Conference on Machine Learning, 2011, pp. 465–472.
[13] D. Ernst, M. Glavic, F. Capitanescu, and L. Wehenkel, “Reinforcement learning versus model predictive control: A comparison on a
power system problem,” In IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and
Cybernetics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 517–529, 2009.
[14] F. Berkenkamp, M. Turchetta, A. P. Schoellig, and A. Krause, “Safe
model-based reinforcement learning with stability guarantees,” In
Proc. of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), vol. 1705,
2017.
[15] A. K. Akametalu, J. F. Fisac, J. H. Gillula, S. Kaynama, M. N.
Zeilinger, and C. J. Tomlin, “Reachability-based safe learning with
Gaussian processes,” in In Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control (CDC), 2014, pp. 1424–1431.
[16] G. Wahba, Spline Models for Observational Data.
Siam, 1990,
vol. 59.
[17] F. Berkenkamp, A. Krause, and A. P. Schoellig, “Bayesian optimization with safety constraints: Safe and automatic parameter tuning in
robotics,” arXiv:1602.04450 [cs], 2016.
[18] E. M. Bronstein, “Approximation of convex sets by polytopes,” Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 727–762, 2008.
[19] N. Srinivas, A. Krause, S. Kakade, and M. Seeger, “Gaussian process
optimization in the bandit setting: No regret and experimental design,”
in In Proc. of the International Conference on Machine Learning
(ICML), 2010, pp. 1015–1022.
[20] F. Berkenkamp, R. Moriconi, A. P. Schoellig, and A. Krause, “Safe
learning of regions of attraction for uncertain, nonlinear systems with
Gaussian processes,” in In Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision
and Control (CDC), 2016, pp. 4661–4666.
[21] T. F. Filippova, “Ellipsoidal estimates of reachable sets for control
systems with nonlinear terms,” In Proc. of the International Federation
of Automatic Control (IFAC), vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 15 355–15 360, 2017.
[22] L. Asselborn, D. Gross, and O. Stursberg, “Control of uncertain
nonlinear systems using ellipsoidal reachability calculus,” In Proc. of
the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC), vol. 46,
no. 23, pp. 50–55, 2013.
[23] A. B. Kurzhanskii and I. Vályi, Ellipsoidal Calculus for Estimation
and Control. Boston, MA : Birkhäuser, 1997.
[24] L. Breiman and A. Cutler, “A deterministic algorithm for global
optimization,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 58, no. 1-3, pp. 179–
199, 1993.
[25] D. H. van Hessem and O. H. Bosgra, “Closed-loop stochastic dynamic
process optimization under input and state constraints,” in In Proc. of
the American Control Conference (ACC), vol. 3, 2002, pp. 2023–2028.
[26] A. Wächter and L. T. Biegler, “On the implementation of an interiorpoint filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming,” Mathematical Programming, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 25–57, 2006.
[27] J. Andersson, “A general-purpose software framework for dynamic
optimization,” PhD Thesis, Arenberg Doctoral School, KU Leuven,
Leuven, Belgium, 2013.
[28] H. Kwakernaak and R. Sivan, Linear Optimal Control Systems.
Wiley-interscience New York, 1972, vol. 1.
[29] Richards Arthur and How Jonathan P., “Robust variable horizon model
predictive control for vehicle maneuvering,” International Journal of
Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 333–351, 2006.
A PPENDIX
A. Generalized eigenvalue problem
Starting at (12), we compute the similar problem
r2 (Q, S) =
max ||S(x − p)||22 =
x∈E(p,Q)
max
sT Q−1 s≤1
sT S T Ss,
(36)
where we used the definition of ellipsoids and the 2-norm under the variable shift s = x−p. Since S has full column rank
and S T S is symmetric positive definite, the maximum of (36)
is at the boundary, r2 (Q, S) = maxsT Q−1 s=1 sT S T Ss,
which is a generalized eigenvalue problem.
| 3cs.SY
|
PCA from noisy, linearly reduced data: the diagonal case
arXiv:1611.10333v1 [math.ST] 30 Nov 2016
Edgar Dobriban∗, William Leeb†, and Amit Singer‡
Abstract
Suppose we observe data of the form Yi = Di (Si + εi ) ∈ Rp or Yi = Di Si + εi ∈ Rp ,
i = 1, . . . , n, where Di ∈ Rp×p are known diagonal matrices, εi are noise, and we wish to
perform principal component analysis (PCA) on the unobserved signals Si ∈ Rp . The first
model arises in missing data problems, where the Di are binary. The second model captures
noisy deconvolution problems, where the Di are the Fourier transforms of the convolution
kernels. It is often reasonable to assume the Si lie on an unknown low-dimensional linear
space; however, because many coordinates can be suppressed by the Di , this low-dimensional
structure can be obscured.
We introduce diagonally reduced spiked covariance models to capture this setting. We
characterize the behavior of the singular vectors and singular values of the data matrix under
high-dimensional asymptotics where n, p → ∞ such that p/n → γ > 0. Our results have the
most general assumptions to date even without diagonal reduction. Using them, we develop
optimal eigenvalue shrinkage methods for covariance matrix estimation and optimal singular
value shrinkage methods for data denoising.
Finally, we characterize the error rates of the empirical Best Linear Predictor (EBLP)
denoisers. We show that, perhaps surprisingly, their optimal tuning depends on whether we
denoise in-sample or out-of-sample, but the optimally tuned mean squared error is the same in
the two cases.
1
Introduction
Principal component analysis (PCA) is a classical statistical method that decomposes a collection of
datapoints s1 , . . . , sn ∈ Rp as a linear combination of vectors that account for the most variability
(e.g., Jolliffe, 2002; Anderson, 2003). More formally, if s1 , . . . , sn are drawn from a probability
distribution with mean zero and covariance matrix ΣS , then the principal components (PCs) of the
distribution are the eigenvectors u1 , . . . , up of ΣS . Typically, we approximate the distribution by
projecting it onto the PCs with the largest eigenvalues.
∗ Department of Statistics, Stanford University. E-mail: [email protected]. Supported in part by NSF
grant DMS-1407813, and by an HHMI International Student Research Fellowship.
† Program
in
Applied
and
Computational
Mathematics,
Princeton
University.
E-mail:
[email protected]. Supported by the Simons Collaborations on Algorithms and Geometry.
‡ Department of Mathematics, and Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University. Email: [email protected]. Partially supported by Award Number R01GM090200 from the NIGMS, FA955012-1-0317 from AFOSR, Simons Foundation Investigator Award and Simons Collaborations on Algorithms and
Geometry, and the Moore Foundation Data-Driven Discovery Investigator Award.
1
A more specific model arising in many applications is the spiked covariance model (Johnstone,
2001). First, the signal Si is a linear combination of r fixed but unobserved orthonormal PCs uk :
Si =
r
X
1/2
`k zik uk ,
(1)
k=1
where r is a fixed parameter (independent of n and p) and zik are iid standardized random variables.
Here `k are the eigenvalues, or equivalently the variances along the PCs uk . Second, the observations
are Xi = Si + εi , where εi is noise with iid standardized entries. The spiked covariance model has
been widely studied in probability and statistics (e.g., Baik et al., 2005; Baik and Silverstein, 2006;
Paul, 2007; Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi, 2012, etc); see also Paul and Aue (2014); Yao et al.
(2015).
This paper considers the setting when the vectors Si are not only corrupted by noise, but also
linearly reduced. This means that for given matrices Di ∈ Rqi ×p , we observe either
Yi = Di Xi = Di Si + Di εi .
(2)
Yi = Di Si + εi .
(3)
or
We think of the reduction matrix Di as either a projection matrix or a linear filter reducing the
information that we observe. In general, it will not be possible to reconstruct a vector v from Di v.
We refer to model (2) as the reduced-noise model, and to model (3) as the unreduced-noise model.
In the reduced-noise model, both the signal and noise are reduced, while in the unreduced-noise
case, only the signal is. These models generalize the spiked covariance model, and arise naturally
in several settings. For instance:
1. Missing data: For diagonal matrices Di with zeros or ones the reduced-noise model from
(2) corresponds to missing data problems widely encountered in statistics (e.g., Schafer, 1997;
Little and Rubin, 2014). For random Di independent of other variables, we are under the
assumption of missing completely at random (MCAR).
2. Deconvolution and image restoration: In image processing, an image might be corrupted
by “blurring”—convolution with a linear filter—followed by noise. After taking the Fourier
transform, this can be modeled as a coordinate-wise multiplication by a diagonal matrix Di ,
followed by adding noise. This corresponds to the unreduced-noise model from (3). For
example, the image formation model in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) under the linear,
weak phase approximation leads to such a model (Frank, 1996). A closely related model was
recently used by Bhamre et al. (2016), where Si are Fourier transforms of projection images
of molecules, and Di are contrast transfer functions.
3. Structural variability in cryo-EM: In cryo-EM, Si is the three-dimensional structure of a
molecule, and Di is a tomographic projection of this volume onto a randomly selected plane.
Since the molecule typically has only a few degrees of freedom, such as different conformations
or states, it is reasonable to model Si to lie on some unknown low-dimensional space (e.g.,
Katsevich et al., 2015; Andén et al., 2015). This corresponds to the unreduced-noise model
from (3): the data Yi = Di Si + εi are tomographic projections Di Si with added noise εi .
2
4. Signal acquisition and compressed sensing: In some signal acquisition tasks such as
hyperspectral imaging, due to resource constraints it is convenient to acquire reduced or
compressed measurements of signals. The reductions are often taken to be random projections.
It is of interest to reconstruct the PCs of the original measurements (e.g., Chang, 2003; Fowler,
2009). This falls under the reduced-noise model from (2).
There may certainly be many other applications fitting this framework. In the above examples
it is natural to posit that the distribution of the signal vectors Si is of low effective dimensionality.
In this paper we will assume that the distribution lies on some unknown linear space of small
dimension r, as in equation (1). Given observations of the form (2) or (3), we address several
natural statistical questions:
1. Covariance estimation: How to estimate the covariance matrix of the signals Si ? This is
both a fundamental statistical problem, and has numerous applications, including classification and denoising.
2. PCA: How should we estimate the principal components of Si ? This question is of special
interest due to the importance of PCA for exploratory data analysis and visualization.
3. Denoising: How can we denoise—or predict—the individual signal vectors Si ? This is a
central question both in the missing data problems, where it corresponds to imputation, as
well as in the image processing problems, where it amounts to noise reduction.
In this paper, we develop new methods for a special class of models, where the matrices Di ∈
Rp×p are diagonal. We will call the observations Yi from (2) or (3) diagonally reduced. The
missing data and deconvolution problems belong to this class. In the high-dimensional asymptotic
regime where p, n both grow to infinity and p/n → γ > 0, we develop methods that provide clear,
quantitative answers to all questions posed above, under quite weak assumptions.
Related work by Katsevich et al. (2015) and Andén et al. (2015) develops methods for covariance
estimation when the Di ’s are projection matrices mapping a 3-D electron density to its integral on a
randomly chosen plane. In this data acquisition model for cryo-EM, the authors propose consistent
estimators of the covariance of the electron density. However, their observation models are different
from our diagonally reduced models. In Bhamre et al. (2016), the questions of covariance estimation
and denoising are studied empirically when the Di ’s come from the contrast transfer function of a
microscope and the Si ’s are Fourier transforms of clean tomographic projections.
Nadakuditi (2014) develops methods for low-rank matrix estimation with missing data. Our
results are more general, and also include methods for covariance estimation and denoising individual datapoints, see Sec. 2.3 for more details. Lounici (2014) develops eigenvalue soft thresholding
methods for covariance estimation with missing data. In our somewhat more specialized models,
we instead find the optimal eigenvalue shrinkers, and they are different from soft thresholding. Cai
and Zhang (2016) develop minimax rate-optimal covariance matrix estimators for missing data,
focusing on bandable and sparse models. We instead focus on the spiked covariance model.
We next give a brief overview of our results.
1.1
Probabilistic Results
A lot of work in random matrix theory studies the asymptotic spectral theory of the spiked covariance model and its variants, see e.g., Paul and Aue (2014); Yao et al. (2015). In Sec. 2, we
3
introduce two general diagonally reduced spiked covariance models corresponding to (2) and (3).
We characterize the limiting eigenvalues of the data matrix Y (with rows Yi> ), and the limiting
angles of its singular vectors with the population singular vectors (of the matrix S with rows Si> ).
More specifically, we show in Thm. 2.1 that the eigenvalue distribution of n−1 Y > Y converges to a
general Marchenko-Pastur distribution (Marchenko and Pastur, 1967), while the top few eigenvalues
have well-defined almost sure limits. This mirrors the behavior known in unreduced spiked models,
(e.g., Baik et al., 2005; Baik and Silverstein, 2006; Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi, 2012); however,
our assumptions in Sec. 2 are very general, and in fact lead to the most general results to date even
in the unreduced case when Di = Ip (see Cor. 2.3 and Sec. 2.3 for discussion).
In the special case where the entries of Di are iid, the limiting spectrum and the angles between
the population and empirical singular vectors are given by explicit formulas related to the standard
Marchenko-Pastur law, as described in Cor. 2.2. For general Di , we can compute numerically
the quantities specified by Thm. 2.1 with the Spectrode method (Dobriban, 2015); see Sec.
2.4. All computational results of this paper are reproducible with software publicly available at
github.com/dobriban/diagonally_reduced/.
1.2
Covariance estimation
In Sec. 3, we apply the probabilistic results from Sec. 2 to develop methods for covariance estimation
from diagonally reduced data, under the additional assumption that the diagonal entries of the
reduction matrices Di are iid. The prototypical example is the missing data problem with uniform
missingness, where in the reduced-noise model (2) the entries are Bernoulli(δ).
Already for unreduced data from the spiked covariance model, the sample covariance matrix is
a poor estimator of the population covariance, since neither the empirical PCs nor the empirical
spectrum converge to their population counterparts. Though little can be done about correcting
the PCs, one can develop optimal shrinkage estimators of the eigenvalues. In the unreduced case,
Donoho et al. (2013) consider estimators of the form U η(Λ)U > , where U is the orthogonal matrix
of PCs, Λ is the matrix of eigenvalues of the sample covariance, η : R → R is a shrinkage function,
and η(Λ) replaces every diagonal element λ of Λ by η(λ).
In Sec. 3, we take a similar approach to the problem of covariance estimation in reduced models.
We first define an unbiased estimator of the population covariance of the unreduced signals (Eq. 10).
Building on the results of Sec. 2, we describe the asymptotic spectral theory of this estimator, and
finally derive shrinkers of the spectrum that are asymptotically optimal for certain loss functions.
We explicitly derive the optimal shrinkers in the case of operator norm loss (Eq. (15) for reducednoise and Eq. (23) for unreduced-noise) and Frobenius norm loss (Eq. (18) for reduced-noise and Eq.
(24) for unreduced-noise). We also derive the asymptotic errors of the optimal shrinkers (Eq. (17)
and (19)), and give a recipe for deriving the optimal shrinkers for a broad class of loss functions.
1.3
Denoising
In Sec. 4, we consider denoising, the task of predicting the signal vectors Si based on the observations
Yi . For this we study the Best Linear Predictor (BLP) well-known from random effects models
(e.g., Searle et al., 2009). The general form of a BLP is Ŝi = ΣS (ΣS + Σε )−1 Yi , where Σε is the
covariance matrix of the noise. This is also known as a “linear Bayesian” method (Hartigan, 1969).
In other areas such as electrical engineering and signal processing, it is known as the “Wiener
4
filter”, “(linear) Minimum Mean Squared Estimator (MMSE)” (Kay, 1993, Ch. 12), “linear Wiener
estimator” (Mallat, 2008, p. 538), or “optimal linear filter” (MacKay, 2003, p. 550-551).
The BLP is an “oracle” method, because it depends on unknown population parameters. In
practice we can use the empirical BLP (EBLP), Σ̂S (Σ̂S + Σ̂ε )−1 Yi , where the unknown parameters
are estimated using the data. Due to the inconsistency of PCA in high dimensions, this is suboptimal to the BLP. However, we can find the asymptotically optimal method for estimating the
covariance matrix ΣS using the empirical PCs. This estimator holds several surprises. In particular, the optimal EBLP coefficients are different for in-sample and out-of-sample denoising—but
the optimal mean squared error ends up identical! See Thms. 4.1, 4.3 for reduced-noise and Sec.
4.4 for unreduced-noise. It also turns out that the formula for in-sample EBLP, applied to all Yi ,
is identical to optimal singular value shrinkage estimators (Sec. 4.2.2).
This analysis involves characterizing random quantities with an intricate dependence structure,
such Yi> Di ûk , where ûk is the k-th PC of the sample covariance matrix of Yi . For this we extend
significantly the technique introduced by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) to study the
angles between uk and ûk . We call this approach the outlier equation method (see Sec. 4).
2
2.1
Probabilistic results
Main probabilistic results
This section presents a new result in random matrix theory, which will be the key tool for our work
on covariance estimation. Recall that we have diagonally reduced observations Yi = Di (Si + εi ) or
Yi = Di Si + εi , i = 1, . . . , n, where Si ∈ Rp are unobserved signals and Di ∈ Rp×p are diagonal
Pr
1/2
matrices. The signals have the form Si = k=1 `k zik uk .
Here uk are deterministic signal directions with kuk k = 1. We will assume that uk are delocalized, so that |uk |∞ ≤ C log(p)B /p1/2 for some constants B, C > 0. The scalars zik are standardized independent random variables, specifying the variation in signal strength from sample to
sample. For simplicity we assume that the deterministic spike strengths are different and sorted:
`1 > `2 > . . . > `r > 0. Finally εi = Γ1/2 αi is sampling noise, where Γ = diag(g12 , . . . , gp2 ) is
diagonal and deterministic, and αi = (αi1 , . . . , αip )> has independent standardized entries.
The diagonal matrices Di = diag(Di1 , . . . , Dip ) have the form
Di = µ + Σ1/2 Ei ,
(4)
where Ei have independent standardized entries. Here µ = diag(µ1 , . . . , µp ) ∈ Rp×p is the deterministic diagonal mean and Σ = diag(σ12 , . . . , σp2 ) ∈ Rp×p is the deterministic diagonal covariance
matrix of the entries of the reduction matrices. Let Hp be the uniform distribution on the p scalars
2
gj2 · EDij
= gj2 · (µ2j + σj2 ), j = 1, . . . , p, and let Gp be the analogous object for gj2 , j = 1, . . . , p. It
turns out that these are the distributions of noise variances relevant for our models. For dealing
with model (2), we assume that as p → ∞, Hp converges to a compactly supported limit distribution H: Hp ⇒ H. For dealing with model (3), we assume that Gp converges to a compactly
supported limit distribution G: Gp ⇒ G.
We will consider the high-dimensional regime where n, p → ∞ such that p/n → γ > 0. In
this setup, our answers will depend on the general Marchenko-Pastur distribution (Marchenko and
Pastur, 1967). This law describes the behavior of empirical eigenvalue distributions of sample
covariance matrices: If N is an n × p matrix with iid standardized entries, and T is a p × p positive
5
Table 1: Definitions
Name
Definition
Defined in
Reduced Observation
(2), (3)
Signal
Yi = Di (Si + εi ) or Yi = Di Si + εi
Pr
1/2
Si = k=1 `k zik uk
Reduction Matrix
Di = µ + Σ1/2 Ei
(4)
(1)
µ = diag(µ1 , . . . , µp ), Σ = diag(σ12 , . . . , σp2 )
Noise
Noise Variances
εi = Γ1/2 αi , where Γ = diag(g12 , . . . , gp2 )
Pp
Hp = p−1 j=1 δgj2 (µ2j +σj2 ) , Hp ⇒ H
Pp
Gp = p−1 j=1 δgj2 , Gp ⇒ G
Stieltjes Transform
Fγ,H , F γ,H (x) = γFγ,H (x) + (1 − γ)δ0
R dF γ,H (x)
R dFγ,H (x)
mγ,H (z) =
x−z , mγ,H (z) =
x−z
R
mH (z) = dH(x)
x−z
D-Transform
Dγ,H (x) = x · mγ,H (x) · mγ,H (x)
Upper Edge
b2H = sup supp(Fγ,H )
General MP Law
semidefinite matrix with eigenvalue distribution converging to H, then the eigenvalue distribution
of the p × p matrix n−1 T 1/2 N > N T 1/2 converges almost surely (a.s.) to the Marchenko-Pastur
distribution Fγ,H (see e.g., Bai and Silverstein, 2009, for a reference).
When T = Ip is the identity, Fγ,H is known as the standard Marchenko-Pastur distribution, and
has density (if γ ∈ (0, 1)):
p
(g+ − x)(x − g− )
fγ (x) =
I(x ∈ [g− , g+ ])
2πx
√
where g± = (1 ± γ)2 . For general H, Fγ,H does not have a closed form, but it can be studied
numerically (see e.g., Dobriban, 2015).
Closely related to Fγ,H is the distribution F γ,H (x) = γFγ,H (x) + (1 − γ)δ0 . This is the limit of
the eigenvalue distribution Rof the n×n matrix n−1 N > T N . We will also need the Stieltjes transform
mγ,H of Fγ,H , mγ,H (z) = (x − z)−1 dFγ,H (x), and the Stieltjes transform mγ,H of F γ,H . Based
on these, one can define the D-transform of Fγ,H by
Dγ,H (x) = x · mγ,H (x) · mγ,H (x).
Up to the change of variables x = y 2 , this agrees with the D-transform defined in BenaychGeorges and Nadakuditi (2012). Let b2H be the supremum of the support of Fγ,H , and Dγ,H (b2H ) =
limt↓b Dγ,H (t2 ). It is easy to see that this limit is well defined, and is either finite or +∞. Let us
denote the support of a distribution H on R by supp(H).
Denote the normalized data matrix Ỹ = n−1/2 Y , with the n × p matrix Y having rows Yi> . Our
main probability result, proved later in Sec. 5.1, is the following.
Theorem 2.1 (Diagonally reduced spiked models). Consider the observation models (2) and (3),
under the above assumptions. Suppose that
6
4
4
1. Eαij
< C, EEij
< C, and E|zi |4+φ < C for some φ > 0 and C < ∞.
2. Under model (2), sup supp(Hp ) → sup supp(H). Under model (3), sup supp(Gp ) → sup supp(G).
3. The squared norms kµuk k2 converge to τk > 0.
4. Under model (2), µuk are generic with respect to M = Γ(Σ + µ2 ) in the sense that
−1
u>
µuk → I(j = k) · τk · mH (z)
j µ(M − zIp )
for all z ∈ C+ , where mH is the Stieltjes transform of H.
−1
Under model (3), µuk are generic with respect to M = Γ, i.e., u>
µuk → I(j =
j µ(M − zIp )
k) · τk · mG (z).
Then
1. Under model (2), the eigenvalue distribution of Ỹ > Ỹ converges to the general MarchenkoPastur law Fγ,H a.s. In addition, the k-th largest singular value of Ỹ converges, σk (Ỹ ) →
tk > 0 a.s., where
−1
if `k > 1/[τk Dγ,H (b2H )],
Dγ,H ( τk1`k )
(5)
t2k =
2
otherwise.
bH
Moreover, let νj = µuj /kµuj k be the normalized reduced signals and let ûk be the right
singular vector of Ỹ corresponding to σk (Ỹ ). Then (νj> ûk )2 → c2jk a.s., where
(
mγ,H (t2k )
if j = k and `k > 1/[τk Dγ,H (b2H )],
0
2
2
D
γ,H (tk )τk `k
cjk =
0
otherwise.
2. Under model (3), the analogous results hold with G replacing H everywhere.
Assumption 4 needs explanation. This assumption generalizes the existing conditions for spiked
models. In particular, it is easy to see that it holds when the vectors uk are random with independent
coordinates. Specifically, let x, y are two independent random vectors with iid zero-mean entries
with variance 1/p. Then Ex> µ(M − zIp )−1 µx = p−1 tr µ(M − zIp )−1 µ. Assumption 4 requires
that this converges to τ · mH (z), which happens for instance when the vector µ itself has random
independent coordinates with variance τ /p, or when it equals a multiple of the identity. However,
Assumption 4 is more general, as it does not require any kind of randomness in uk .
Thm 2.1 gives the limiting angles of the empirical eigenvectors ûk with the reduced population
eigenvectors νj = µuj /kµuj k. These are in general different from the true eigenvectors uj . However,
in our main application (Cor. 2.2 and the following sections) they are the same, because µ is a
multiple of identity.
One can gain some insight into the result in the simpler case where the noise is uncolored, so
that Γ = Ip . In that case, before reduction we have a spike strength ` and an average noise level
of unity. P
After reduction under model (2), we have a spike strength `kµuk2 , and an average noise
2
level p−1 j EDij
= p−1 (kµk2 + kσk2 ), where σ = (σ1 , . . . , σp ). For a delocalized u, we expect
2
−1
2
kµuk ≈ p kµk . Therefore, reduction in model (2) typically decreases the signal strength by a
factor of
kµk2
.
kµk2 + kσk2
7
However, the spike strength after reduction—`kµuk2 —depends on the correlation between µ and
u. In particular, the reduction can vary among the different PCs. In contrast it is easy to see in a
similar way that reduction in model (3) may increase or decrease the signal strength.
The key strength of Thm. 2.1 is its generality. Specifically, there is essentially only one previous
result on reduced spiked models, appearing in Nadakuditi (2014). However, that only studies iid
Bernoulli projections under restrictive conditions on the noise, whereas we allow for (1) a general
diagonal covariance structure Σ in the reduction matrices, as well as (2) a general diagonal noise
structure Γ, and (3) more general moment conditions. Moreover, even in unreduced spiked models,
our results are already the most general results to date (see Sec. 2.3).
We think that the generality is important for several reasons: first, for practical reasons it is
good to have results that require as few assumptions as possible, especially unverifiable conditions
like “randomness” in uk or “orthogonal invariance” of the noise. As a consequence of these general
results, existing tools like singular value shrinkage are shown to apply more generally, so this is a
direct improvement. Second, from a theoretical perspective it is good to understand the reason for
the “spiking” behavior; our results clarify for instance that “orthogonal invariance” of the noise is
not needed.
2.1.1
Comments on the proof
The broad outline of the proof is inspired by the argument presented in Benaych-Georges and
Nadakuditi (2012) for unreduced spiked models. However, there are several new steps. First,
the proof in Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) concerns only the unreduced case, and the
dependence introduced by the random reduction matrices Di is a new challenge. The observations
in model (2) are Di Xi = Di Si + Di εi , so the “signal” Di Si and “noise” Di εi are dependent.
However, we show that the dependence is asymptotically negligible. For non-diagonal reduction
matrices Di , the depencence may be asymptotically non-negligible; this explains why we currently
need the diagonal assumption.
As a second novelty, the proof involves finding the limits of certain quadratic forms u>
k R(z)uj ,
where R(z) is a specific resolvent matrix with complex argument z. Since the uk are deterministic,
the concentration arguments of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) are not available. Instead,
we adapt the “deterministic equivalents” approach of Bai et al. (2007). For this we need to take
the imaginary part of the complex argument z to zero, which appears to be a new argument in this
context.
2.2
Reduced standard spiked models
We will later use the following corollary for the reduced standard spiked model where the reduction
coefficients and the noise entries are iid random variables. Suppose that the noise variances are
equal to unity, so Γ = Ip and thus εi have independent standardized entries. Moreover assume that
the reduction matrices Di have iid random diagonal entries Dij with mean µ = EDij and variance
σ 2 = Var[Dij ]. Note that previously µ was a matrix, but from now on it will be a scalar, and
there will be no possibility for confusion. Let m = µ2 + σ 2 and δ = µ2 /m. In this case it is easy
to see that the reduced eigenvectors are the same as the unreduced ones, i.e., νk = uk . Moreover,
Assumption 4 from Thm. 2.1 reduces to u>
k ul → 0 as n → ∞, if k 6= l.
Our answers can be expressed in terms of the well-known characteristics of the standard spiked
model. The asymptotic location of the top singular values will depend on the spike forward map
8
(e.g., Baik et al., 2005):
λ(`) = λ(`; γ) =
(1 + `) 1 +
(1 + γ 1/2 )2
γ
`
if ` > γ 1/2 ,
otherwise.
The asymptotic angle between singular vectors will depend on the cosine forward map c(`; γ) ≥ 0
given by (e.g., Paul, 2007; Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi, 2011, etc):
(
1−γ/`2
if ` > γ 1/2 ,
2
2
1+γ/`
(6)
c(`) = c(`; γ) =
0
otherwise.
Corollary 2.2 (Reduced standard spiked models). Under observation model (2), in the above
setting, the eigenvalue distribution of m−1 Ỹ > Ỹ converges to the standard Marchenko-Pastur law
with aspect ratio γ, a.s. Moreover, m−1/2 σk (Ỹ ) → tk > 0 a.s., where
t2k = λ(δ`k )
(7)
2
2
Finally, let ûk be the right singular vector of Ỹ corresponding to σk (Ỹ ). Then (u>
j ûk ) → cjk a.s.,
where
2
c (δ`k )
if j = k
c2jk =
(8)
0
otherwise.
2
Under observation model (3) in the above setting, we have σk (Ỹ )2 → t2k = λ(µ2 `), while (u>
j ûk ) →
2
2
2 2
cjk , where cjk = c (µ `k ) if j = k and 0 otherwise.
For the proof, see Sec. 5.3. While in the current paper we only use this corollary of Thm. 2.1,
the proof in the special case is essentially as involved as in the general case. For this reason, and
for potential future applications, we prefer to state Thm. 2.1 as well.
In this special case, reduction in model (2) lowers the spike strength from ` to δ`. This result is
related to Thm 2.4 of Nadakuditi (2014) on missing data, but we have the following advantages: (1)
our result works under a 4-th order moment condition instead of requiring all bounded moments;
(2) our result admits arbitrary diagonal reductions, not just missing data (see Sec. 2.3 for details).
Finally, when there is no reduction, i.e., when Di = Ip for all i, then it turns out we do not need
the delocalization of uk . Indeed that is only needed to show that the diagonal reductions introduce
a negligible amount of dependence, but we do not need this when Di = Ip . Hence, we can state the
following corollary for unreduced spiked models:
Corollary 2.3 (Standard spiked models). Suppose we observe unreduced signals Yi = Si + εi ,
and we do not assume
of the PCs uk . Suppose that the other assumptions of
Prthe delocalization
1/2
Cor. 2.2 hold: Si = k=1 `k zik uk , where u>
k uj → δkj , while zik , εij are iid standardized with
E|zi |4+φ < C, Eε4ij < C for some φ > 0 and C < ∞.
Then the conclusions of Cor. 2.2 hold. Specifically, the spectrum of n−1 Y > Y converges to a
standard MP law, its spikes converge a.s. to λ(`k ) and the squared cosines between population and
sample eigenvectors converge a.s. to c2 (`k ).
Again, the key strength of this corollary is its generality, specifically that it only has 4-th moment
assumptions, not orthogonal invariance.
9
Figure 1: The effect of reduction on sample spikes and correlations between PCs. Formulas from
Thm. 2.1 computed with Spectrode (Dobriban, 2015) overlaid with simulations. See Sec. 2.4.
2.3
Related work
There is substantial earlier work on unreduced spiked models, and even in this case our result leads
to an improvement. We refer to Paul and Aue (2014); Yao et al. (2015) for general overviews of the
area. The paper of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) is closely related to our approach, and
we essentially follow their novel technique, relying on controlling certain bilinear forms. When the
signal direction u is fixed, their results require the distribution of the noise matrix to be bi-unitarily
invariant, which essentially reduces to Gaussian distributions. Our model is more general since it
only requires a fourth-moment condition on the noise.
The technique introduced by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2011, 2012) was adapted to
non-white Gaussian signal-plus noise matrices Xi = `1/2 zi u + Γ1/2 εi in Chapon et al. (2012). They
rely on an integration by parts formula for functionals of Gaussian vectors and the Poincaré-Nash
inequality. A Poincaré inequality was also assumed in Capitaine (2013). Our result is stronger,
since we only require fourth moment conditions.
Previous extensions to the setting of missing data are found in Nadakuditi (2014), which describes the OptShrink method for singular value shrinkage matrix denoising. The method is extended to data missing at random, and in particular the limit spectrum of the data matrix with
zeroed-out missing data is found (his Thm. 2.4). This is related to Thm. 2.1, but we have the
following advantages: (1) our result works under the optimal 4-th order moment condition instead
of requiring all moments to be bounded; (2) our result admits arbitrary reductions, not just binary
projection matrices, (3) we extend to reduction matrices Di that have non-iid entries, (4) we allow
heteroskedastic diagonal noise εi = Γ1/2 αi ; and (5) we also consider the unreduced-noise model
from Eq. (3) (whereas Nadakuditi (2014) considers the reduced-noise model from Eq. (2)).
2.4
A numerical study
We report the results of a numerical study to gain insight into our theoretical results. We consider
model (2), where Xi = `1/2 zi u + εi , where the noise is heteroskedastic, εi ∼ N (0, Γ), and Γ is
10
the diagonal matrix of eigenvalues of a p × p autoregressive (AR) covariance matrix of order 1,
with entries Σij = ρ|i−j| . We set Yi = Di Xi , where Di have iid Bernoulli(δ) entries. We set the
missingness parameter δ to the values 1/3, 2/3 and 1. We choose the AR autocorrelation coefficient
ρ = 0.5, and vary the spikes ` from 0 to 3.5.
We compute numerically the formulas in Thm. 2.1, using the recent Spectrode method (Dobriban, 2015), see Sec. 5.1.6 for the details. We compare this with a Monte Carlo simulation with
n = 200, γ = 1/2, zi , u generated as Gaussian random variables, and the results averaged over 10
Monte Carlo trials. The results—displayed on Fig. 1—allow us to study the effect of reduction on
spiked models. In particular, we observe the following phenomena:
• The theory and simulations show good agreement. For eigenvalues, the results are very
accurate. For the cosine, the results are more variable, and especially so for small δ.
• In the left plot of Fig. 1, we see that the empirical spike is an increasing function of the
population spike `. Moreover, the location of the phase transition (PT) decreases with δ, i.e.,
reduction degrades the critical signal strength.
• Similarly, in the right plot of Fig. 1, we see that the cosine between population and empirical
PCs increases with the population spike `. For a given `, the cosine decreases as δ → 0.
It is not hard, but beyond our scope, to formalize the last two observations into theorems.
3
Covariance matrix estimation
In this section, we develop methods for covariance estimation in the reduced-noise model Yi =
Di Xi + Di εi (Secs. 3.2, 3.3) and in the unreduced-noise model Yi = Di Xi + εi (Sec. 3.4). We also
discuss some related work in Sec. 3.5. Finally, we present numerical experiments illustrating the
results in Sec. 3.6.
We restrict our attention to a special case of the diagonally reduced model we considered in
Sec. 2. We assume as in Sec. 2.2 that the entries of the reduction matrices Di are independently
and identically distributed. We also suppose that the noise εi is white, with variance 1 on each
coordinate; that is, Cov(εi ) = Ip . We will also require that the coordinates of εi and the diagonal
entries of Di both have finite eighth moments. Recall that in the setting of Cor. 2.2, we have
2
µ = EDij and also that σ 2 = Var(Dij ). The second moment is m = EDij
= µ2 + σ 2 , and δ = µ2 /m.
For data missing uniformly at random, m = µ = δ is the probability that each entry is observed.
3.1
The reduced-noise model
In the reduced-noise model, we observe n samples of the random vector Y = D(S + ε). It is then
easy to see that we have the following formulas relating the covariance matrix of the signal ΣS and
the covariance matrix of the observation ΣY :
ΣY = µ2 ΣS + σ 2 diag(ΣS ) + mIp
2
ΣS =
σ
1
ΣY −
diag(ΣY ) − Ip
µ2
mµ2
11
(9)
Pn
These equations make it clear that the sample covariance matrix Σ̂Y = n−1 i=1 Yi Yi> is a
biased estimator of the signal covariance matrix ΣS . Based on the second equation, we consider
the following debiased estimator of ΣS :
Σ̂S =
1
σ2
Σ̂
−
diag(Σ̂Y ) − Ip .
Y
µ2
mµ2
(10)
Here we assume for simplicity that µ, σ 2 are known; but these scalar parameters are straightforward
to estimate from the observed Di . In the special case of data missing completely at random, i.e.,
of iid sampling of entries with probability δ, we have µ2 = δ 2 and m = δ, so this formula becomes
1
1
1
(11)
Σ̂S = 2 Σ̂Y +
− 2 diag(Σ̂Y ) − Ip .
δ
δ
δ
If our goal is to estimate ΣX = ΣS + Ip instead of ΣS , the corresponding unbiased estimator
is Σ̂X = Σ̂Y /δ 2 + (δ − 1) diag(Σ̂Y )/δ 2 . This recovers the unbiased estimator of ΣX proposed by
Lounici (2014). That paper proposes to estimate ΣX by applying the soft-thresholding function
ητ (λ) = (λ − τ )+ to the empirical eigenvalues λ of the covariance Σ̂X . Lounici (2014) proves error
bounds for this estimator in both operator and Frobenius norm losses, for covariance matrices ΣX
of small effective rank ref f (Σ) = tr(Σ)/kΣkop . In contrast, we want to estimate the covariance
matrix ΣS of the signal. For this different task, in the spiked covariance model, the function ητ is
not optimal, as we will show in Section 3.3.
In the next section, we employ the probabilistic results from Sec. 2 to determine the asymptotic
spectral theory of Σ̂Y . In particular, we find asymptotic formulas for the eigenvalues, and the angles
between its PCs and those of the population covariance ΣS . Next, we show how to use these results
in conjunction with the theory of Donoho et al. (2013) to derive optimal non-linearities η of the
spectrum of Σ̂Y to estimate ΣS for a variety of loss functions.
3.2
The asymptotic spectral theory of Σ̂S in reduced-noise
In this section, we will analyze the asymptotic spectral theory of the debiased estimator Σ̂S ; that
is, the limiting eigenvalue distribution, spikes, and limiting angles of its top eigenvectors with those
of ΣS . We will rely on Corollary 2.2 from Section 2 and an argument controlling the diagonal terms
in the proof in Sec. 5.4.1.
√
Corollary 3.1. Let 1 ≤ k ≤ r. Suppose that `k satisfies `k > γ/δ. Then in the limit p, n → ∞
and p/n → γ, the k th largest eigenvalue of Σ̂S , k = 1, . . . , r, converges almost surely to
1
γ
1
(δ`k + 1) 1 +
− .
(12)
δ
δ`k
δ
The distribution of the bottom p − r eigenvalues of Σ̂S converges to a shifted and scaled Marchenko√
√
Pastur distribution (µM P − 1)/δ supported on the interval [(1 − γ)2 − 1, (1 + γ)2 − 1]/δ.
If û0k is the k th eigenvector of Σ̂Y and ûk is the k th eigenvector of Σ̂S , then almost surely we
have limn→∞ hû0k , ûk i2 = 1 and
lim hûk , uk i2 =
n→∞
12
1 − γ/(δ`k )2
.
1 + γ/(δ`k )
Table 2: Optimal covariance shrinkagepin unreduced-noise model. `˜ is the function defined by
equation (16), δ = µ2 /m, and sk =
1 − c2k is the asymptotic sine of the angle between the
empirical and population PCs.
Loss function
Eigenvalue
Operator
˜
`(δλ+1)
δ
Squared Frobenius
2 ˜
˜
`(δλ+1)·c
(`(δλ+1))
δ
Asymptotic loss
References
`1 s1
Pr
(15), (17)
k=1 (1
− c4k )`2k
(18), (19)
√
If `k ≤ γ/δ, then the top eigenvalue converges to the upper edge of the shifted MP distribution,
and the cosine converges to 0.
The shifted Marchenko-Pastur distribution arises as the limiting empirical spectral distribution
of the eigenvalues corresponding to noise. This is also the case for the available case sample
covariance of pure noise (Jurczak and Rohde, 2015). We will discuss the available-case estimator
in Secs. 3.5 and 3.6.
3.3
Optimal shrinkage of the spectrum of Σ̂S in reduced-noise
Having characterized the asymptotic spectrum of the debiased estimator Σ̂S , we can apply the
technique of Donoho et al. (2013) to derive optimal shrinkers of the eigenvalues of Σ̂S to minimize
various loss functions. Any of the 26 loss functions found in Donoho et al. (2013) can be adapted to
the setting of diagonally reduced data. In Sec. 5.4.2, we carefully check the details of this program.
Write the eigendecomposition of ΣS as ΣS = U ΛU > and the eigendecomposition of the debiased
estimator Σ̂S as Σ̂S = Û Λ̂Û . For a given function η : R → [0, ∞), define the matrix Σ̂ηS by
Σ̂ηS = Û η(Λ̂)Û >
where η(Λ̂) is the diagonal matrix that replaces the k th diagonal element λ̂k of Λ̂ with η(λ̂k ).
For any value of p, let Lp (A, B) denote a loss function between two p-by-p symmetric matrices
A and B. We consider loss functions with two key properties: first, they must be orthogonally
invariant; that is, Lp (A, B) = Lp (U AV, U BV ) for any orthogonal matrices U and V . Second,
they must decompose over blocks. This means that if A1 , B1 ∈ Rp1 ×p1 and A2 , B2 ∈ Rp2 ×p2 where
p = p1 + p2 , then either Lp (A1 ⊕ A2 , B1 ⊕ B2 ) = max{Lp1 (A1 , B1 ), Lp2 (A2 , B2 )}, in which case we
say Lp is max-decomposable; or Lp (A1 ⊕ A2 , B1 ⊕ B2 ) = Lp1 (A1 , B1 ) + Lp2 (A2 , B2 ), in which case
we say Lp is sum-decomposable. Operator norm loss Lp (A, B) = kA − Bkop is max-decomposable,
whereas squared Frobenius norm loss Lp (A, B) = kA − Bk2F is sum-decomposable.
Our goal is to find the function η that minimizes the asymptotic loss over certain classes; that
is, we seek:
η ∗ = arg min L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS )
η
where L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) is the almost sure limit of Lp (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) as n, p → ∞ and p/n → γ. We will show
from first principles that this limit is well defined. As in Donoho et al. (2013), we will consider only
those functions η that collapse the vicinity of the bulk to 0; that is, for which there is an ε > 0 such
13
that η(λ) = 0 whenever λ ≤ (1 +
given in Cor. 3.1).
In Sec. 5.4.2, we will show:
√
γ)2 /δ − 1/δ + ε (this is the value of the upper bulk edge, as
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) = L2r
M
r
A2 (`k ),
k=1
r
M
B2 (η(λk ), ck , sk )
(13)
k=1
p
` 0
1 − c2 (`) ≥ 0 the
, and ck = c(δ`k ), sk = s(δ`k ), where s(`) =
0 0
asymptotic sine of the angle between the empirical and population PCs,
η(λ)c2 (δ`)
η(λ)c(δ`)s(δ`)
B2 (η(λ), c, s) =
.
η(λ)c(δ`)s(δ`)
η(λ)s2 (δ`)
where A2 (`) =
Since the loss function is either max-decomposable or sum-decomposable, for η to minimize the
right side, it is sufficient that it minimize every individual term L2 (A2 (`k ), B2 (η(λk ), ck , sk )). That
is, the asymptotically optimal η minimizes the two-dimensional loss:
η ∗ = argmin L2 (A2 (`), B2 (η(λ), c, s)).
(14)
η
This dramatically simplifies the problem, as this minimization can often be done explicitly.
Deriving the optimal η now depends on the particular choice of loss function. We consider two
representative cases where a simple closed formula is easily found: operator norm loss, and squared
Frobenius norm loss. The same recipe of explicitly solving the problem (14) can be used for
any orthogonally-invariant and max- or sum-decomposable loss function, including those found in
Donoho et al. (2013).
3.3.1
Operator norm loss/max-decomposable losses
Since operator norm loss Lp (A, B) = kA − Bkop is max-decomposable, equation (13) implies that
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) = max L2 (A(`k ), B(η(λk ), ck , sk )).
1≤k≤r
Consequently, the asymptotically optimal η is the one that minimizes the two-dimensional loss
function L2 (A(`k ), B(η(λk ), ck , sk )) = kA(`k ) − B(η(λk ), ck , sk )kop . Repeating the derivation in
Donoho et al. (2013), the optimal η(λk ) sends λk back to its population value, `k . From formula (12)
in Cor. 3.1,
η ∗ (λ) =
˜
`(δλ
+ 1)
δ
where `˜ inverts the spike forward map ` 7→ λ(`; γ) defined in Sec. 2.2,
p
2
˜ = y − 1 − γ + (y − 1 − γ) − 4γ .
`(y)
2
(15)
(16)
Direct computation shows that L2 (A(`k ), B(η ∗ (λk ), ck , sk )) = `k sk ; consequently, the asymptotic
loss is given by the formula:
∗
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηs ) = `1 s1 .
14
(17)
˜
Table 3: Optimal covariance
p shrinkage in unreduced-noise model. ` is the function defined by
2
equation (16), and sk = 1 − ck is the asymptotic sine of the angle between the empirical and
population PCs.
3.3.2
Loss function
Eigenvalue
Operator
˜
`(µ
λ+1)
µ2
Squared Frobenius
˜ 2 λ+1)·c2 (`(µ
˜ 2 λ+1))
`(µ
µ2
2
Asymptotic loss
References
`1 s1
Pr
(23), (17)
k=1 (1
− c4k )`2k
(24), (19)
Frobenius norm loss/sum-decomposable losses
Since the squared Frobenius loss Lp (A, B) = kA − Bk2F is sum-decomposable, equation (13) implies
that
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) =
r
X
L2 (A(`k ), B(η(λk ), ck , sk )).
k=1
Consequently, the asymptotically optimal η is the one that minimizes the two-dimensional loss
function L2 (A(`k ), B(η(λk ), ck , sk )) = kA(`k ) − B(η(λk ), ck , sk )k2F . As derived in Donoho et al.
˜ k + 1)/δ,
(2013), the value of η(λk ) that minimizes this is `k c2k . We have already seen that `k = `(δλ
2
2
˜
where ` is the function defined by (16). Consequently, with c (`) = c (`; γ) being the cosine forward
map, the formula for η ∗ (λ) is
η ∗ (λ) =
˜
˜
`(δλ
+ 1) · c2 (`(δλ
+ 1))
.
δ
(18)
A straightforward computation shows that L2 (A(`k ), B(`k c2k , ck , sk )) = (1 − c4k )`2k , and consequently, the asymptotic loss is given by the formula:
∗
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηs ) =
r
X
(1 − c4k )`2k .
(19)
k=1
3.4
The unreduced-noise model
In the unreduced-noise model Yi = Di si + εi we can develop similar methods for covariance estimation. The formulas relating ΣS to ΣY are
ΣY = µ2 ΣS + σ 2 diag(ΣS ) + Ip
(20)
2
ΣS =
σ
1
1
ΣY −
diag(ΣY ) − Ip .
µ2
mµ2
m
Consequently, the analogous debiased covariance estimator is:
Σ̂S =
1
σ2
1
Σ̂Y −
diag(Σ̂Y ) − Ip .
2
2
µ
mµ
m
15
(21)
In this section, we will derive optimal shrinkers of the spectrum of Σ̂S in the unreduced-noise
model using the same technique as for the reduced-noise model in Sec. 3.3. Our analysis rests on
the following result, proved in Sec. 5.4.1:
√
Corollary 3.2. Let 1 ≤ k ≤ r. Suppose that `k satisfies `k > γ/µ2 . Then in the limit p, n → ∞
and p/n → γ, the k th largest eigenvalue of Σ̂S converges almost surely to
1 2
γ
1
(µ
`
+
1)
1
+
(22)
− 2.
k
2
2
µ
µ `k
µ
The distribution of the bottom p − r eigenvalues of Σ̂S converges to a shifted Marchenko-Pastur
√
√
distribution supported on the interval [(1 − γ)2 − 1, (1 + γ)2 − 1]/µ2 .
If û0k is the k th eigenvector of Σ̂Y and ûk is the k th eigenvector of Σ̂S , then almost surely we
have limn→∞ hû0k , ûk i2 = 1 and
lim hûk , uk i2 =
n→∞
1 − γ/(µ2 `k )2
.
1 + γ/(µ2 `k )
√
If `k ≤ γ/µ2 , then the top eigenvalue converges to the upper edge of the shifted MP distribution,
and the cosine converges to 0.
˜ 2 λ̂k +
Given an empirical eigenvalue λ̂k of Σ̂S , we estimate the population eigenvalue `k by `(µ
2
1)/µ where `˜ is the function given by formula (16). This estimator converges almost surely to the
√
true value `k if `k exceeds the threshold γ/µ2 . This also gives us an estimator of the squared
˜ 2 λ̂k + 1)). We can now derive the optimal non-linear functions on the
cosine, by the formula c(`(µ
spectrum. For operator norm loss, we have
η ∗ (λ) =
˜ 2 λ + 1)
`(µ
,
µ2
(23)
∗
which incurs an asymptotic loss of L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηs ) = `1 s1 . For squared Frobenius norm loss, the
optimal non-linearity is
˜ 2 λ + 1) · c(`(µ
˜ 2 λ + 1))
`(µ
2
µ
Pr
∗
and the asymptotic loss is L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηs ) = k=1 (1 − c4k )`2k .
η ∗ (λ) =
3.5
(24)
Alternative linear systems for estimating ΣS
The optimal shrinkers derived in Secs. 3.3 and 3.4 for estimating the covariance ΣS from the
reduced-noise observations start from the debiased estimators (10) for reduced-noise and (21) for
unreduced noise. Another way of viewing these estimators is as the solution to a linear system: for
reduced-noise, this system is given by equation (9), and for unreduced-noise by equation (20).
Of course, there are other linear systems yielding unbiased estimators whose spectrum we could
shrink. The papers Katsevich et al. (2015); Andén et al. (2015); Bhamre et al. (2016) consider such
an estimator, which we will briefly discuss here.
16
By definition, for any k = 1, . . . , n, ΣS = ES,ε [Sk Sk> ], where ES,ε denotes the expectation with
respect to the random Sk and εk , but not the Dk . We can therefore write in the unreduced-noise
model Yk = Dk Sk + εk :
Dk ΣDk = ES,ε [(Dk Sk )(Dk Sk )> ] = ES,ε [(Yk − εk )(Yk − εk )> ] = ES,ε [Yk Yk> ] + Ip .
(25)
If we knew the values of ES,ε [Yk Yk> ] for every k, we could derive an unbiased estimator of ΣS by
solving the n equations given by (25). The papers Katsevich et al. (2015); Andén et al. (2015);
Bhamre et al. (2016) instead substitute the observed value Yk Yk> for its expected value, and derive
an unbiased estimator of ΣS by the minimization problem
n
Σ̂S = arg min
Σ
1X
kDk ΣDk> − Yk Yk> − Ip k2F .
n
k=1
Differentiating in Σ, we see that Σ̂S must satisfy the linear system:
n
n
n
k=1
k=1
k=1
1X >
1X >
1X >
Dk Dk ΣDk> Dk =
(Dk Yk )(Dk> Yk )> −
Dk Dk .
n
n
n
We now consider another linear system, defined by averaging the n equations (25):
n
n
k=1
k=1
1X
1X
Dk ΣS Dk =
ES,ε [Yk Yk> ] − Ip .
n
n
Note that the matrices Dk are fixed in this equation. By replacing ES,ε [Yk Yk> ] with the estimate
Yk Yk> , we define a new estimator of ΣS as the solution to the equation
n
n
k=1
k=1
1X
1X
Dk ΣDk =
Yk Yk> − Ip .
n
n
(26)
In the case of reduced-noise, we can repeat the same derivation and arrive at an unbiased
estimator that satisfies the system
n
n
n
k=1
k=1
k=1
1X
1X
1X 2
Dk ΣDk =
Yk Yk> −
Dk .
n
n
n
(27)
We will denote the estimator solving (26) (in the unreduced-noise case) and (27) (in the reduced
noise case) by Σ̂0s . Taking the expectation of each side of (27), we arrive at the linear system (20),
which defines our estimator Σ̂S in the unreduced-noise model. Similarly, taking the expectation of
each side of (26), we arrive at the linear system (9), which defines our estimator Σ̂S in the reducednoise model. Consequently, we expect that, in the limit n, p → ∞, Σ̂S and Σ̂0S will be close. In
fact, we can show that the relative error of the estimators converges to 0, as stated in the folowing
proposition (proved in Sec. 5.4.3):
Proposition 3.3. In both the reduced-noise and unreduced-noise models, the relative difference
kΣ̂S − Σ̂0S kF /kΣ̂S kF → 0 almost surely as n, p → ∞ and p/n → γ.
17
3.6
Numerical experiments
We perform experiments with missing data, where the diagonal entries of the reduction matrices
Di are independent Bernoulli(δ) random variables. In this case, µ = m = δ, and σ 2 = δ(1 − δ). The
unbiased estimator to which we apply shrinkage is given by the formula (11). In all experiments,
both the signal and the noise are drawn from Gaussian distributions.
3.6.1
The errors in estimating the covariance
In the first experiment, we illustrate the dependence of the asymptotic errors on the parameters δ
and γ. The clean signal vectors Si are drawn from a rank 1 Gaussian. The noise is also Gaussian
noise, of unit variance; the ambient dimension p is fixed at p = 1200 in this experiment, while the
number of samples n varies with γ. The top two rows of Fig. 2 shows the errors in estimation for
Frobenius loss and operator norm loss, as functions of the parameters γ and δ. The error bars cover
the empirical mean error, plus/minus two standard deviations over 200 runs of the experiment.
Several phenomena are apparent in these plots. First, the empirical mean of the errors is wellapproximated by the asymptotic error formulas (17) and (19), especially as the number of samples
grows (corresponding to smaller γ, as n = p/γ = 1200/γ). Second, the errors decay as δ approaches
1, which is expected as larger δ increases the effective signal strength. Third, the errors grow as γ
approaches 1; this is also expected, since large γ leads to higher dimensional problems.
4
4.1
Denoising
Setup
It is often of interest to denoise the observations Yi and predict the signal components Si . We
envision a scenario where the data (Yi , Di ), i = 1, . . . , n is already collected, and we construct
the denoisers using this dataset. With in-sample denoising we denoise Yi to predict the signal
components Si . This makes sense in many applications where we want to use the entire dataset to
construct the denoiser.
A closely related scenario is out-of-sample denoising, where we want to denoise a new datapoint
(Y0 , D0 ). This arises in applications where new samples are made available after an initial preprocessing of Y1 , . . . , Yn is performed, and it is not desired or not feasible to repeat this processing
on the augmented dataset (Y0 , D0 ), (Y1 , D1 ), . . . , (Yn , Dn ) for every new data point.
While these two settings are very closely related, it turns out, perhaps surprisingly, that the
optimal way to construct the denoisers differs substantially between the two. The reason turns out
to be closely related to the observation that in high dimensions, the addition of a single datapoint
changes the direction of the PCs. We will explain this phenomenon in detail below.
We first study the reduced-noise model from (2) in the setting of Cor. 2.2, where the diagonal
entries of Di are drawn iid from a distribution with mean µ and variance σ 2 , and the observations
are Yi = Di (Si + εi ).
is a special type of random effects model, as the “effects” zik of the
PrThis1/2
“factors” uk in Si = k=1 `k zik uk are random from sample to sample. As usual in random effects
models, the optimal way to predict Si from a mean squared error (MSE) perspective is to use the
Best Linear Predictor—or BLP—(e.g., Searle et al., 2009, Sec. 7.4). The BLP of Si is the predictor
Ŝi = M Yi that minimizes EkŜi − Si k2 .
−1
It is well known that the BLP is ŜiBLP = Cov [Si , Yi ] Cov [Yi , Yi ] Yi . Under the assumptions
of Cor. 2.2, we can show (see Sec. 5.5) that the BLP has the same asymptotic MSE properties as
18
500
γ=.9
γ=.6
γ=.3
450
γ=.9
γ=.6
γ=.3
18
16
errors (operator norm loss)
errors (Frobenius loss)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
50
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0.2
0.4
δ
0.6
0.8
1
δ
500
δ=.2
δ=.5
δ=.8
450
δ=.2
δ=.5
δ=.8
18
16
errors (operator norm loss)
errors (Frobenius loss)
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
50
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
γ
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
γ
Figure 2: Top row : Estimation error of the covariance as a function of δ. Left: Frobenius shrinker.
Right: operator norm shrinker. For each δ, 200 Monte Carlo tests were averaged. The error bars
cover two standard deviations; the lines go through the predicted errors. Bottom row : Same plot
as a function of γ.
19
Table 4: Denoising in the single-spiked case. BLP: population Best Linear Predictor using u.
EBLP: in-sample empirical Best Linear Predictor using û. EBLP-OOS: out-of-sample empirical
Best Linear Predictor using û. Here we abbreviate λ = λ(δ`; γ), c2 = c2 (δ`; γ), s2 = 1 − c2 ,
β = 1 + γ/(δ`).
Name
Definition
Asy MSE
Asy Opt η
Asy Opt MSE
Ref
BLP
η · uu> Yi
(1 − ηµ)2 ` + η 2 m
µ`
µ2 `+m
m`
µ2 `+m
Thm. 4.1
EBLP
η · ûû> Yi
` + η 2 · mλ − 2η · µ`c2 · β
µ`c2
µ2 `+m
`·
EBLP-OOS
η · ûû> Yi
` + η 2 · (µ2 `c2 + m) − 2η · µ`c2
2
µ`c
µ2 `c2 +m
`·
µ2 `c2 s2 +m
µ2 `c2 +m
2
2 2
µ `c s +m
µ2 `c2 +m
Thm. 4.1
Prop. 4.3
a denoiser of the following simpler form:
Ŝiτ,B =
r
X
τk uk u>
k Yi .
(28)
k=1
The denoisers Ŝiτ,B are indexed by τ = (τ1 , . . . , τr ), and our argument shows that with the choice
τk = µ`k /(µ2 `k + m) they are in fact asymptotically equivalent to BLP denoisers.
In practice, the true PCs uk are not known, so we use the Empirical BLP (EBLP), where we
estimate the unknown parameters uk using the entire dataset. Here we will use the k-th top right
singular vector ûk of the n × p matrix Y with rows Yi> as an estimator of uk . In analogy with the
simplified form of the denoisers in (28), we will consider EBLPs scaled by η = (η1 , . . . , ηr ) having
the form:
r
X
Ŝiη =
ηk ûk û>
(29)
k Yi .
k=1
Our goal is to find the optimal scalars ηk , and characterize their MSE.
4.2
In-sample denoising
First, we will study in-sample denoising, where the data to be denoised are also used to construct
the denoisers. Our main findings for the asymptotic MSE (AMSE) are summarized in Table 4 (in
the single-spiked case) and in the following theorem, proved in Sec. 5.6.
Theorem 4.1 (In-sample denoising). In the setting of Cor. 2.2 consider in-sample best linear
predictors (BLP) of the signals Si based on the observations Yi .
Pr
1. The BLP denoisers Ŝiτ,B = k=1 τk · uk u>
k Yi based on the population singular vectors have
an AMSE limn,p→∞ EkSi − Ŝiτ,B k2 of
AM SE B (τ1 , . . . , τr ; `1 , . . . , `r , γ) =
r
X
k=1
20
AM SE B (τr ; `r , γ),
where AM SE B (τ ; `, γ) = (1 − τ µ)2 ` + τ 2 m is the AMSE of the BLP Ŝiτ,B = τ · uu> Yi in a
single-spiked model with spike strength ` under the assumptions of Cor. 2.2. The asymptotically optimal coefficients are
µ`k
τk∗ = 2
.
µ `k + m
Pr
2. The EBLP denoisers Ŝiη = k=1 ηk · ûk û>
k Yi , based on the empirical singular vectors have an
AMSE limn,p→∞ EkSi − Ŝiη k2 of
AM SE E (η1 , . . . , ηr ; `1 , . . . , `r , γ) =
r
X
AM SE E (ηr ; `r , γ),
(30)
k=1
where AM SE E (η; `, γ) = ` + η 2 · m · λ(δ`; γ) − 2η · µ` · c2 (δ`; γ) · β is the AMSE of EBLP
Ŝiη = η · ûû> Yi in a single-spiked model with spike strength ` under the assumptions of Cor.
2.2. Here λ(δ`; γ) is the limit empirical spike, while c2 = c2 (δ`; γ) is the squared cosine, both
corresponding to spike strength δ`, defined in Cor. 2.2. The asymptotically optimal coefficients
are
ηk∗ =
µ`k c2k
,
µ2 `k + m
(31)
where c2k = c2 (δ`; γ).
The basic discovery is that the optimal coefficients for empirical PCs are different from those
for population PCs. The coefficients using empirical PCs are reduced by a squared cosine compared
to the coefficients using population PCs: ηk∗ = c2k τk∗ .
Note that we chose the optimal coefficients to minimize the limiting MSE. However, the limiting
MSE, and thus the optimal coefficients, depend on the unknown parameters δ, `k , c2k . To make this
a practical method, we can estimate the unknown parameters. The missingness parameter δ can
be estimated by plug-in. Based on Cor. 2.2, the estimation of `k and c2k can be done by inverting
the spike forward map `k → λ(`k ), see e.g., Bai and Ding (2012); Donoho et al. (2013).
It is worth pointing out that the squared error kSi − Ŝi k2 for each individual column Si of BLP
and EBLP does not converge in probability or a.s. In fact, its variability is of unit order, and
does not decrease as n, p → ∞. However, as shown in Thm 4.1, its expectation—the MSE—does
converge. Furthermore, we will show in Sec. 4.2.2 that the average error of EBLP over the entire
data matrix converges almost surely (to the AMSE for a single column). As we will show, this
is because EBLP, when applied to all columns of the data matrix, is a singular value shrinkage
estimator, defined by modifying the singular values of the data matrix while leaving the empirical
singular vectors fixed.
As a consequence, in the case of missing data the optimal AMSE agrees with that achieved by
optimal singular value shrinkage described in Nadakuditi (2014) and Gavish and Donoho (2014).
We emphasize, however, that Thm. 4.1 applies to individual data points, not just to the entire
matrix.
4.2.1
Comments on the proof
Part 2 of Thm. 4.1 is a nontrivial result, because the AMSE is determined by stochastically dependent random quantities such as u>
k Di ûk . These are challenging to study, because Di and ûk are
dependent random variables. We will analyze these quantities from first principles.
21
While we will explain our method in detail later, briefly, we use the outlier equation approach
(see Lemma 5.14), which reduces studying the inner products w> ûk to certain inner products w> r,
where r = r(Y ) are vectors that depend on the entire dataset but not directly on the singular
vector ûk . As we will see, these inner products are more convenient to study. The basic method
was introduced by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), who used it to study the angles between
uk and ûk . We extend their approach to other angles, which are more challenging to study.
4.2.2
Singular value shrinkage and the almost sure convergence of the error in the
reduced-noise model
A well-studied approach to matrix denoising is known as singular value shrinkage. Here, the singular
values of the data matrix Y are replaced with shrunken versions, analogous to the eigenvalue
shrinkage of covariance matrices studied in Sec. 3. When applied to every
Prrow of the data matrix
Y , EBLP is a singular value shrinkage algorithm: indeed, since Ŝiη = k=1 ηk · ûk û>
k Yi , we can
write the entire denoised matrix in the form
Ŝ η =
r
X
ηk · ûk û>
kY =
k=1
r
X
ηk σk (Y ) · ûk v̂k> .
(32)
k=1
In other words, the denoised matrix Ŝ η has the same singular vectors as the data matrix Y , where
the singular values have been moved from σk (Y ) to ηk σk (Y ) for k = 1, . . . , r (and the remaining ones
set to 0). It turns out that for the value of ηk∗ given by equation (31), ηk σk (Y ) is the optimal singular
value of the denoised matrix if we seek to minimize the asymptotic Frobenius loss kS − Ŝ η k2F .
The proof of this fact follows easily from the analysis of the optimal singular value shrinkers
given by Gavish and Donoho (2014). This paper derives optimal shrinkers only when there is no
missing data, and the task is to recover a low rank matrix from noisy observations of its entries. The
k th singular value of the asymptotically optimal shrunken matrix (with respect to Frobenius loss)
1/2
is `k ck c̃k , where ck is the asymptotic cosine of the angle between the right population singular
vector and the right empirical singular vector, and c̃k is the asymptotic cosine of the angle between
the left population singular vector and the left empirical singular vector. In the models considered
in Gavish and Donoho (2014), these values are ck = c(`k ; γ), where c is the cosine forward map
from (6), and c̃k = c̃(`k ; γ) ≥ 0, where c̃2 (`; γ) = (1 − γ/`2 )/(1 + 1/`).
As we can see from Cor. 2.2, in our data model the reduced model behaves like the original model,
but with spike strengths reduced from `k to δ`k . In particular, the value of c2k is c2k = c2 (δ`; γ). In
fact, it is easy to see from the proof of that this is true for the left singular vectors as well; that is,
c̃2 = c̃2 (δ`k ; γ).
We now quote the result of Gavish and Donoho (2014) that the optimal singular value is equal
1/2
to `k ck c̃k ; since formula (32) shows that this is equal to ηk∗ σk (Y ), the optimal coefficient ηk∗ is:
1/2
ηk∗ =
`k c(δ`k ; γ)c̃(δ`k ; γ)
c̃(δ`k ; γ)
1/2
= `k c2 (δ`k ; γ) 1/2
σk (Y )
` σk (Y )c(δ`k ; γ)
k
Substituting the asymptotic value for σk (Y ) given from (7), a straightforward algebraic manipulation shows that
1/2
1/2
ηk∗ = `k c2 (δ`k ; γ)
`k
`k c2k
=
.
δ`k + 1
δ`k + 1
22
This agrees with the value for the optimal coefficient ηk for EBLP derived in Thm. 4.1. In
particular, the EBLP estimator we derive for the entire data matrix and the optimal singular value
shrinkage estimator are identical. Furthermore, from the analysis of Gavish and Donoho (2014),
the error of the entire denoised matrix converges almost surely to the expression given in equation
(30).
We have proved the following theorem:
Theorem 4.2. If Y = [Y1 , . . . , Yn ]> is the n-by-p matrix of observations in the reduced-noise
model, then the asymptotically optimal singular value shrinkage estimator of the n-by-p signal matrix
S = [S1 , . . . , Sn ]> is equal to the EBLP estimator defined in Thm. 4.1. Furthermore, the squared
Frobenius error of this estimator converges a.s. to the formula (30).
4.2.3
Comparison with matrix completion algorithms
In the case when the reductions matrices are binary, the task of denoising the data matrix Y to
approximate S is a matrix completion problem – see, for instance, Candès and Recht (2009), Recht
(2011), Keshevan et al. (2009) and Keshevan et al. (2010). A typical model for matrix completion is
a low-rank matrix with eigenvectors satisfying an incoherence condition, with order O(n·poly(log n))
entries revealed uniformly at random. In the setting we study in this paper, the number of observed
entries of the matrix Y will be O(n2 ), almost an order of magnitude more. When the noise level is
very small compared to the magnitude of the entries in the clean matrix (or put differently, when
`r 1), then the smaller number of samples is sufficient to recover the low-rank matrix to high
accuracy. The references listed above provide several methods with these guarantees.
We compare the in-sample EBLP denoiser to the OptSpace method for matrix completion found
in Keshevan et al. (2009) and Keshevan et al. (2010). Briefly, their method removes rows/columns
with too many observations, truncates the singular values of the data matrix Y , and then cleans
up the resulting matrix by an iterative algorithm. In Figure 3 we plot the squared Frobenius errors
in reconstructing a rank 1 matrix, for different choices of spike size ` and missingness parameter
δ. In this experiment, both the signal and noise are Gaussian, γ = .8 and the dimension p = 400.
Each data point plotted is the average error over 100 Monte Carlo runs of the experiment.
We observe that the in-sample EBLP outperforms OptSpace when ` is small relative to the
noise level. As the size of ` grows, OptSpace’s performance improves, and for small δ and large `
it outperforms EBLP. This is consistent with the guarantees provided for OptSpace; it does well in
the low-noise regime, with a small number of samples.
4.3
Out-of-sample denoising
We now study out-of-sample denoising in the reduced-noise model, where we denoise new datapoints
from the same distribution using a denoiser constructed on an existing dataset. This is typically
faster than recomputing the denoiser on the entire dataset. For the oracle BLP denoiser, which
assumes knowledge of u, this is the same as in-sample denoising. For the EBLP, however, it turns
out that the optimal shrinkage coefficients in this case are different.
To analyze this case, let Y0 = D0 X0 be the new sample from the same distribution. We
evaluate the limit of the out-of-sample mean squared prediction error EkS0 − Ŝ0η k2 of the EBLP
Pr
Ŝ0η = k=1 ηk ûk û>
k Y0 , where ûk were formed based on Yi , i ≥ 1.
23
δ = .1
1.8
δ = .7
0.8
EBLP error
OptSpace error
1.6
EBLP error
OptSpace error
0.7
1.4
0.6
average error
average error
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.2
0
20
0.5
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
140
ℓ
40
60
80
100
120
ℓ
Figure 3: Comparison of EBLP and OptSpace for completing/denoising the matrix, for different
signal strengths. Left; δ = 1/10. Right: δ = 7/10. Errors are measured as the squared Frobenius
norm between the estimator and the full, clean, rank 1 matrix. Every experiment was averaged
over 100 runs, with γ = .8 and p = 400.
Theorem 4.3. In the setting of Cor. 2.2 consider out-of-sample denoising of a new sample Y0 using
the empirical BLP Ŝ0η based on the observations Yi , i = 1, . . . , n. Then the limit of the out-of-sample
prediction error is
r
X
η,o
E (η1 , . . . , ηr ; `1 , . . . , `r , γ) =
E ηk ,o (ηr ; `r , γ),
k=1
where E η,o (η; `, γ) = ` + η 2 · (m + µ2 `c2 ) − 2η · µ`c2 is the out-of-sample prediction error of EBLP in
a single-spiked model with spike ` under the assumptions of Cor. 2.2. The asymptotically optimal
shrinkage coefficients are
µ`k c2k
ηk∗ =
.
m + µ2 `k c2k
See Sec. 5.10 for the proof. The key point is that the optimal shrinkage for out-of-sample
prediction is different from both of the shrinkers from in-sample denoising. We also mention that
in the special case when Di = Ip for all i, the optimal shrinkage formula matches the one obtained
by Singer and Wu (2013), under slightly more restrictive assumptions.
It may be counterintuitive that the optimal coefficient changes when a single data point Y0
is added. However, this can be understood because in high-dimensions, a single data point can
drastically change the empirical eigenvectors. For an illustration
Pn in a simpler setting, consider
the sample covariance matrix based on n samples, Σ̂Y,n = n−1 k=1 Yk Yk> and the corresponding
24
140
sample covariance Σ̂Y,n+1 based on the n + 1 samples Y0 , Y1 , . . . , Yn . Their difference is
Σ̂Y,n − Σ̂Y,n+1 =
n+1
X
1
1
1
1
Y0 Y0> +
Yk Yk> = Y0 Y0> + Σ̂Y,n+1 .
n
n(n + 1)
n
n
k=1
Since the operator norm of Σ̂Y,n+1 converges a.s. to a finite quantity, the term Σ̂Y,n+1 /n is asymptotically negligible. However, the operator norm of Y0 Y0> /n of size kY0 k2 /n, which converges a.s.
to δ. Since the spectral distributions of Σ̂Y,n and Σ̂Y,n+1 converge to the same value, the fact
that kΣ̂Y,n − Σ̂Y,n+1 kop is of order 1 is due to the fact that the addition of a single data point Y0
completely changes the direction of the empirical PCs of the data.
To summarize and better understand our findings, we plot the optimal shrinkage coefficients and
MSE for the three scenarios (BLP, in-sample optimal empirical BLP, and out-of-sample optimal
empirical BLP) in a single-spiked model with γ = 1/2 and Di = Ip for all i, on Fig. 4. The optimal
shrinkage for out-of-sample EBLP is intermediate between the stronger in-sample EBLP and the
weaker out-of-sample BLP shrinkage coefficients. However, perhaps unexpectedly the MSE for the
two EBLP scenarios agrees exactly! This prompts us to state the following result, proved in Sec.
5.11.
Proposition 4.4 (In-sample vs out-of-sample EBLP). The asymptotically optimal shrinkage coefficient for in-sample EBLP is smaller than the asymptotically optimal shrinkage coefficient for the
out-of-sample EBLP. However, the asymptotically optimal MSEs are equal in the two cases.
This result is interesting, because it shows that same MSE can be achieved out-of-sample as
in-sample. Out-of-sample denoising should be harder, because it involves a new datapoint never
seen before. The ”hardness” of out-of-sample denoising should be observed in the leading order
finite sample (n) correction to the asymptotic MSE. However, the above result shows that this
correction vanishes as n, p → ∞. Using the right amount of shrinkage, the same MSE can be
achieved asymptotically even out of sample.
4.4
Unreduced-noise
We now study the denoising problem under the unreduced-noise model (3), where Yi = Di Si + εi
under the assumptions of Cor. 2.2. The analysis is similar to the reduced-noise model (2). The key
conclusions are summarized in Table 5.
−1
The BLP of Si based on Yi is ŜiBLP = Cov [Si , Yi ] Cov [Yi , Yi ] Yi . Under the conditions of Cor.
Pr
2.2, we can show (see Sec. 5.12.1) that this is asymptotically equivalent to Ŝiτ = k=1 τk uk u>
k Yi ,
where τk = µ`k /(µ2 `k + 1).
As before, the AMSE of Siτ with arbitrary τ decouples into the AMSEs over the different spikes
`k , and those are equal to the AMSEs for the single-spiked model with spikes equal to `k . For a
single-spiked model with spike ` we obtain in Sec. 5.12.1 that
EkSi − Ŝiτ k2 → ` + τ 2 (`µ2 + 1) − 2τ `µ.
The optimal coefficient is τ ∗ = `µ/(`µ2 + 1)—as it should be, based on the above discussion—and
it has an AMSE of `/(`µ2 + 1). The advantage of this calculation is that it provides the MSE for
any coefficient τ .
Next, for the EBLP in the multispiked case, we use ûk as estimators of uk . Since the form of the
BLP is the same as before, the EBLP scaled by η = (η1 , . . . , ηr ) have the form in (29). To compute
25
Figure 4: Optimal shrinkage coefficients (left) and MSE (right) for the three scenarios (BLP, insample optimal empirical BLP, and out-of-sample optimal empirical BLP) for γ = 1/2 and δ = 1.
Table 5: Unreduced-noise: Denoising in the single-spiked case. BLP: population Best Linear Predictor using u. EBLP: in-sample empirical Best Linear Predictor using û. EBLP-OOS: out-of-sample
empirical Best Linear Predictor using û. Here we abbreviate λ = λ(µ2 `; γ), c2 = c2 (µ2 `; γ).
Name
Definition
Asy MSE
Asy Opt η
Asy Opt MSE
BLP
η · uu> Yi
` + η 2 · (µ2 ` + 1) − 2η · µ`
µ`
µ2 `+1
`
µ2 `+1
EBLP
η · ûû> Yi
` + η 2 · λ − 2η · µ`c2 · [1 + γ/(µ2 `)]
µ`c2
µ2 `+1
`−λ
EBLP-OOS
η · ûû> Yi
` + η 2 · (µ2 `c2 + 1) − 2η · µ`c2
µ`c2
µ2 `c2 +1
`·
µ`c2
µ2 `+1
2
µ2 `c2 s2 +1
µ2 `c2 +1
the AMSE, it is again not hard to see that it decouples into the corresponding single-spiked AMSEs.
In the single-spiked case, we find in Sec. 5.12.2 that with λ = λ(µ2 `; γ), c2 = c2 (µ2 `; γ),
EkSi − Ŝiη k2 → ` + η 2 · λ − 2η · µ`c2 · [1 + γ/(µ2 `)].
This shows that the optimal coefficient is η ∗ = µ`c2 /(µ2 ` + 1).
Finally, for out-of-sample EBLP denoising, it is again not hard to see that the AMSE decouples
over the different spikes, and each term equals the AMSE in the single-spiked case. For the AMSE
in the single-spiked case, we let (Y0 , D0 ) be a new sample, and find (Sec. 5.12.3)
EkS0 − ηûû> Y0 k2 → ` + η 2 (1 + µ2 `c2 ) − 2ηµ`c2 .
The optimal coefficient is η ∗ = µ`c2 /(1+µ2 `c2 ), while the optimal MSE is `(1+µ2 `c2 s2 )/(1+µ2 `c2 ).
These findings are summarized in Table 5.
26
4.4.1
Singular value shrinkage and the almost sure convergence of the error in the
unreduced-noise model
As we discussed in Sec. 4.2.2 for the reduced-noise model, in-sample EBLP applied to every column
of the data matrix Y = [Y1 , . . . , Yn ]> is equal to the asymptotically optimal singular value shrinkage
estimator of the clean matrix S = [S1 , . . . , Sn ]> . The same reasoning applies verbatim to the
unreduced-noise model, replacing the almost sure limits of the empirical eigenvalues and angles
with their counterparts for unreduced-noise model.
From Cor. 2.2, the value of the asymptotic value of the cosine of the angle between the right
empirical singular vector and the right population singular vector is c2k is c2k = c2 (µ2 `; γ); and the
same proof of this easily shows that the asymptotic cosine of the angle between the left singular
vectors is c̃2 = c̃2 (δ`k ; γ).
We now quote the formula from Gavish and Donoho (2014), which says that the optimal singular
1/2
value is equal to `k ck c̃k ; since formula (32) shows that this is equal to ηk∗ σk (Y ), the optimal
coefficient ηk∗ is:
1/2
ηk∗ =
`k c(δ`k ; γ)c̃(δ`k ; γ)
c̃(δ`k ; γ)
1/2
= `k c2 (δ`k ; γ) 1/2
σk (Y )
` σk (Y )c(δ`k ; γ)
k
Substituting the asymptotic value for σk (Y ) given from Cor. 2.2, it is easy to see that
1/2
1/2
ηk∗ = `k c2 (δ`k ; γ)
`k
`k c2k
=
.
δ`k + 1
δ`k + 1
This agrees with the value for the optimal coefficient ηk for EBLP derived in Thm. 4.1. In
particular, the EBLP estimator we derive for the entire data matrix and the optimal singular value
shrinkage estimator are identical. Furthermore, from the analysis of Gavish and Donoho (2014),
the error of the entire denoised matrix converges almost surely to the expression given in equation
(30).
We have proved the following theorem:
Theorem 4.5. If Y = [Y1 , . . . , Yn ]> is the n-by-p matrix of observations in the unreduced-noise
model, then the asymptotically optimal singular value shrinkage estimator of the n-by-p signal matrix
S = [S1 , . . . , Sn ]> is equal to the EBLP estimator for the unreduced-noise model defined in Sec. 4.4.
Furthermore, the squared Frobenius error of this estimator converges a.s. to the AMSE in the
unreduced-noise model.
4.5
Simulations
Next we perform a simulation to check the finite-sample accuracy of our formulas for denoising. In
the reduced-noise model with Di = Ip , we consider a single-spiked model with n = 1000, p = 500,
and generate iid Gaussian random variables zi , εi , as well as a standardized iid Gaussian random
vector u. We vary the spike strength on a grid, and compare our formulas for in-sample theoretical
MSE to those obtained by averaging the denoising error in the first sample kŜ1 − S1 k22 over 50
Monte Carlo simulations. The results in Fig. 5 show that the formulas are accurate up to the
sampling error. This validates our results from Thm. 4.1.
27
Figure 5: In-sample MSE of denoising schemes: Theoretical results overlaid with Monte Carlo
(MC) results. BLP: Best Linear Predictor assuming known population eigenvector u. Emp BLP:
Empirical Best Linear Predictor, using the empirical eigenvector û, with the sub-optimal shrinkage
coefficient from the BLP. Opt Emp BLP: Empirical Best Linear Predictor using optimal shrinkage
coefficient. No missing data (δ = 1). γ = 1/2.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Joakim Anden, Tejal Bhamre, Xiuyuan Cheng, David Donoho, and Iain
Johnstone for helpful discussions.
5
5.1
Proofs
Proof of Thm. 2.1
The proof of Thm. 2.1 spans multiple sections, until Sec. 5.2.1. The proof of the claims under
observation models (2) and (3) are very similar. Therefore, we present the proof of the result under
model (2), and outline the argument for model (3) in Sec. 5.1.5.
Moreover, to illustrate the idea of the proof, we first prove the single-spiked case, i.e., when
r = 1. The proof of the multispiked extension is provided in Sec. 5.2. The form Di = µ + Σ1/2 Ei
of the reduction matrices implies the following decomposition for the observations Yi :
Yi = (µ + Σ1/2 Ei )Xi
= µ(`1/2 zi u + εi ) + Σ1/2 Ei Xi
= `1/2 zi µu + [µεi + Σ1/2 Ei Xi ].
This suggests a “signal+noise” decomposition for the reduced vectors Yi . Let us denote by ν =
µu/ξ 1/2 the normalized reduced signal, where ξ = kµuk2 → τ , and by ε∗i = µεi +Σ1/2 Ei Xi the noise
component. The noise has two parts: µεi is due to sampling, while Σ1/2 Ei Xi is due to projection.
28
In matrix form, with the n × p matrix Y having rows Yi> :
Y = (ξ`)1/2 Z̃ν > + E ∗ .
(33)
This suggests that after reduction, the signal strength ` changes to ξ`, while the noise structure
changes from εi to ε∗i . This is not obvious, however, because the noise ε∗i is functionally dependent
on the signal Xi . Therefore we cannot rely on existing results. Instead, we will analyze the model
from first principles, and show that the dependence is asymptotically negligible. For non-diagonal
reduction matrices Di , the depencence may be asymptotically non-negligible; this explains why we
currently need the diagonal assumption.
5.1.1
Proof outline
We will extend the technique of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) to characterize the spiked
eigenvalues in the model (33). We denote the normalized vector Z = n−1/2 Z̃, the normalized noise
N = n−1/2 E ∗ and the normalized observable matrix Ỹ = n−1/2 Y . Then, our model is
Ỹ = (ξ`)1/2 · Zν > + N.
(34)
We will assume that n, p → ∞ such that p/n → γ > 0. For simplicity of notation, we will first
assume that n ≤ p, implying that γ ≥ 1. It is easy to see that everything works when n ≥ p.
By Lemma 4.1 of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), the singular values of Ỹ that are
not singular values of N are the positive reals t such that the 2-by-2 matrix
t · Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 N ν
0
(ξ`)−1/2
Mn (t) = > > 2
−
ν N (t In − N N > )−1 Z t · ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 ν
(ξ`)−1/2
0
is not invertible, i.e., det[Mn (t)] = 0. We will find almost sure limits of the entries of Mn (t),
to show that it converges to a deterministic matrix M (t). Solving the equation det[M (t)] = 0 will
provide an equation for the almost sure limit of the spiked singular values of Ỹ . For this we will
prove the following results:
Lemma 5.1 (The noise matrix). The noise matrix N has the following properties:
1. The eigenvalue distribution of N > N converges almost surely (a.s.) to the Marchenko-Pastur
distribution Fγ,H with aspect ratio γ ≥ 1.
2. The top eigenvalue of N > N converges a.s. to the upper edge b2H of the support of Fγ,H .
This is proved in Sec. 5.1.2. For brevity we write b = bH . Compared to Benaych-Georges and
Nadakuditi (2012), the key technical innovation here is to show that the contribution of the reduced
signal component Σ1/2 Ei Si to E ∗ is negligible. This is accomplished by an ad-hoc bound on the
operator norm of the contribution.
Since Ỹ is a rank-one perturbation of N , it follows that the eigenvalue distribution of Ỹ > Ỹ also
converges to the MP law Fγ,H . This proves the first claim of Thm 2.1.
Moreover, since N N > has the same n eigenvalues as the nonzero
of N > N , the two
R eigenvalues
−1
2
> −1
2
−1
facts in Lemma 5.1 imply that when t > b, n tr(t In −N N ) → (t −x) dF γ,H (x) = −m(t2 ).
Here F γ,H (x) = γFγ,H (x) + (1 − γ)δ0 and m = mγ,H is the Stieltjes transform of F γ,H . Clearly this
convergence is uniform in t. As a special note, when t is a singular value of the random matrix N ,
we formally define (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 = 0 and (t2 In − N N > )−1 = 0. When t > b, the complement of
this event happens a.s. In fact, from Lemma 5.1 it follows that (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 has a.s. bounded
operator norm. Next we control the quadratic forms in the matrix Mn .
29
Lemma 5.2 (The quadratic forms). When t > b, the quadratic forms in the matrix Mn (t) have
the following properties:
1. Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z − n−1 tr(t2 In − N N > )−1 → 0 a.s.
2. Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 N ν → 0 a.s.
3. ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 ν → −m(t2 ) a.s., where m = mγ,H is the Stieltjes transform of the
Marchenko-Pastur distribution Fγ,H .
Moreover the convergence of all three terms is uniform in t > b + c, for any c > 0.
This is proved in Sec. 5.1.3. The key technical innovation is the proof of the third part. Most
results for controlling quadratic forms x> Ax are concentration bounds for random x. Here x = ν
is fixed, and matrix A = (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 is random instead. For this reason we adopt the
“deterministic equivalents” technique of Bai et al. (2007) for quantities x> (zIp − N > N )−1 x, with
the key novelty that we can take the imaginary part of the complex argument to zero. The latter
observation is nontrivial, and mirrors similar techniques used recently in universality proofs in
random matrix theory (see e.g., the review by Erdős and Yau, 2012).
Lemmas 5.1 and 5.2 will imply that for t > b, the limit of Mn (t) is
−t · m(t2 ) −(τ `)−1/2
.
M (t) =
−(τ `)−1/2 −t · m(t2 )
By the Weyl inequality, σ2 (Ỹ ) ≤ σ2 ((ξ`)1/2 · Zν > ) + σ1 (N ) = σ1 (N ). Since σ1 (N ) → b a.s.
by Lemma 5.1, we obtain that σ2 (Ỹ ) → b a.s. Therefore for any ε > 0, a.s. only σ1 (Ỹ ) can be a
singular value of Ỹ in (b + ε, ∞) that is not a singular value of N .
It is easy to check that D(x) = x · m(x)m(x) is strictly decreasing on (b2 , ∞). Hence, denoting
h = limt↓b D(t2 ), for τ ` > h, the equation D(t2 ) = 1/(τ `) has a unique solution t ∈ (b, ∞). By
Lemma A.1 of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), we conclude that for τ ` > h, σ1 (Ỹ ) → t
a.s., where t solves the equation det[M (t)] = 0, or equivalently,
t2 · m(t2 )m(t2 ) =
1
.
τ`
If τ ` ≤ h, then we note that det[Mn (t)] → det[M (t)] uniformly on t > b + ε. Therefore, if
det[Mn (t)] had a root σ1 (Ỹ ) in (b + ε, ∞), det[M (t)] would also need to have a root there, which is
a contradiction. Therefore, we conclude σ1 (Ỹ ) ≤ b+ε a.s., for any ε > 0. Since σ1 (Ỹ ) ≥ σ2 (Ỹ ) → b,
we conclude that σ1 (Ỹ ) → b a.s., as desired. This finishes the spike convergence claim in Thm. 2.1.
Next, we turn to proving the convergence of the angles between the population and sample
eigenvectors. Let Ẑ and û be the singular vectors associated with the top singular value σ1 (Ỹ ) of
Ỹ . Then, by Lemma 5.1 of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), if σ1 (Ỹ ) is not a singular value
of X, then the vector η = (η1 , η2 ) = (u> û, Z > Ẑ) belongs to the kernel of the matrix Mn (σ1 (Ỹ )).
By the above discussion, this 2-by-2 matrix is of course singular, so this provides one linear equation
for the vector r (with R = (t2 In − N N > )−1 )
tη1 · Z > RZ + η2 [Z > RN ν − (ξ`)−1/2 ] = 0.
By the same lemma cited above, it follows that we have the norm identity (with t = σ1 (Ỹ ))
t2 η12 · Z > R2 Z + η22 · ν > N > R2 N ν + 2tη1 η2 · Z > R2 N ν = (ξ`)−1 .
30
(35)
This follows from taking the norm of the equation tη1 · RZ + η2 · RN ν = (ξ`)−1/2 Ẑ (see Lemma
5.1 in Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012)). We will find the limits of the quadratic forms
below.
Lemma 5.3 (More quadratic forms). The quadratic forms in the norm identity have the following
properties:
1. Z > (t2 In − N N > )−2 Z − n−1 tr(t2 In − N N > )−2 → 0 a.s.
2. Z > (t2 In − N N > )−2 N ν → 0 a.s.
3. ν > N > (t2 In − N N > )−2 N ν → m(t2 ) + t2 m0 (t2 ) a.s., where m is the Stieltjes transform of the
Marchenko-Pastur distribution Fγ,H .
The proof is in Sec. 5.1.4. Again, the key novelty is the proof of the third claim. The standard
concentration bounds do not apply, because u is non-random. Instead, we use an argument from
complex analysis constructing a sequence of functions fn (t) such that their derivatives are fn0 (t) =
ν > N > (t2 In − N N > )−2 N ν, and deducing the convergence
fn0 (t) from that of fn (t).
R of
−1
2
> −2
2
Lemma 5.3 implies that n tr(t In − N N ) → (t − x)−2 dF γ,H (x) = m0 (t2 ) for t > b.
Solving for η1 in terms of η2 from the first equation, plugging in to the second, and taking the limit
as n → ∞, we obtain that η22 → c2 , where
m0 (t2 )
1
2
2 0 2
c2
+
m(t
)
+
t
m
(t
)
= .
2
2
τ `m(t )
τ`
Using D(x) = x · m(x)m(x), we find c2 = m(t2 )/[D0 (t2 )τ `], where t solves (5). From the first
equation, we then obtain η12 → c1 , where c1 = m(t2 )/[D0 (t2 )τ `], where t is as above. This finishes
the proof of Thm. 2.1 in the single-spiked case. The proof of the multispiked case is a relatively
simple extension of the previous argument, so we present it in Sec. 5.2.
5.1.2
Proof of Lemma 5.1
Recall that N = n−1/2 E ∗ , where E ∗ has rows ε∗i = µεi + Σ1/2 Ei Xi . Note
ε∗ij = µj εij + σj Eij Xij = [µj + σj Eij ]εij + σj `1/2 Eij zi uj .
Since εi = Γ1/2 αi , the terms aij = [µj + σj Eij ]gj εij are independent random variables with
2
2
variance gj2 EDij
= gj2 (µ2j + σj2 ). Recall that we assumed that the distribution Hp of gj2 EDij
converges weakly to the distribution H.
Hence the eigenvalue distribution of the matrix A> A, where A = (n−1/2 aij )ij , converges
to Marchenko-Pastur distribution Fγ,H (Bai and Silverstein, 2009, Thm. 4.3). Moreover, since
4
4
2
Eαij
< ∞ and EDij
< ∞, we have Ea4ij < ∞. In addition, by assumption sup gj2 EDij
→ sup supp(H).
>
2
Thus the largest eigenvalue of A A converges a.s. to the upper edge b of the support of Fγ,H , see
Bai and Silverstein (1998) and (Bai and Silverstein, 2009, Cor. 6.6).
Therefore, since σj are bounded, it is enough to show that the operator norm of the error matrix
E ∗∗ with entries n−1/2 Eij zi uj converges to zero a.s. This will ensure that N = A + E ∗∗ has the
same two properties as A above, namely its ESD and operator norm converge.
Now, denoting by elementwise products
kE ∗∗ k =
sup
a> E ∗∗ c = n−1/2
kak=kck=1
sup
kak=kck=1
31
(a
z)> E(c
u).
We have ka
zk ≤ kak max |zi | = max |zi | and kc
uk ≤ kck max |ui | = max |ui |, hence
kE ∗∗ k ≤ kEk max |zi | max |ui |.
Since z has iid standardized entries, and C := Ezi4+φ < ∞, we can derive that
P r(max |zi | ≥ a) ≤ E max |zi |4+φ /a4+φ ≤ nC/a4+φ .
0
0
Taking a = n1/2−φ for φ0 small enough, we obtain, max |zi | ≤ n1/2−φ a.s.
However, since Eij are iid standardized random variables with bounded 4-th moment, kEk →
√
1 + γ a.s. (Bai and Silverstein, 2009). Since kuk∞ ≤ C log(p)B /p1/2 , we obtain kE ∗∗ k ≤ C(1 +
0
√
γ) · log(p)B n1/2−φ p−1/2 → 0 a.s., as required.
5.1.3
Proof of Lemma 5.2
Since N = A + E ∗∗ , and kE ∗∗ k → 0 a.s., it is enough to show the same concentration statements
for A instead of N . Indeed, it is easy to see that the error terms are all negligible.
Part 1: For Z > (t2 In − AA> )−1 Z, note that Z has iid entries —with mean 0 and variance
1/n—that are independent of A. We will use the following result:
Lemma 5.4 (Concentration of quadratic forms, consequence of Lemma B.26 in Bai and
i
h √ Silverstein
k
(2009)). Leth x ∈ R be ia random vector with i.i.d. entries and E [x] = 0, for which E ( kxi )2 = 1
√
and supi E ( kxi )4+φ < C for some φ > 0 and C < ∞. Moreover, let Ak be a sequence of
random k × k symmetric matrices independent of x, with a.s. uniformly bounded eigenvalues. Then
the quadratic forms x> Ak x concentrate around their means: x> Ak x − k −1 tr Ak →a.s. 0.
We apply this lemma with x = Z, k = p and Ap = (t2 In − AA> )−1 . To get almost sure
convergence, here it is required that zi have finite 4 + φ-th moment. This shows the concentration
of Z > (t2 In − AA> )−1 Z.
Part 2: To show Z > (t2 In − AA> )−1 Aν concentrates around 0, we note that w = (t2 In −
AA> )−1 Aν is a random vector independent of Z, with a.s. bounded norm. Hence, conditional on
w:
X
X
4
2
2
P r(|Z > w| ≥ a|w) ≤ a−4 E|Z > w|4 = a−4 [
EZni
wi4 +
EZni
EZnj
wi2 wj2 ]
i
−4
≤a
X
4
EZn1
(
wi2 )2
i6=j
−4 −2
=a
n
EZ14
· kwk42
i
For any C we can write
P r(|Z > w| ≥ a) ≤ P r(|Z > w| ≥ a|kwk ≤ C) + P r(kwk > C).
For sufficiently large C, the second term, P r(kwk > C) is summable in n. By the above bound,
the first term is summable for any C. Hence, by the Borel-Cantelli lemma, we obtain |Z > w| → 0
a.s. This shows the required concentration.
Part 2: Finally we need to show that ν > (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 ν concentrates around a definite value.
This is probably the most interesting part, because the vector u is not random. Most results for
controlling expressions of the above type are designed for random u; however here the matrix A is
random instead. For this reason we will adopt a different approach.
32
Under our assumption we have ν > (Γ(Σ + µ2 ) − zIp )−1 ν → mH (z), for z = t2 + iv with v > 0
fixed. Therefore, Thm 1 of Bai et al. (2007) shows that ν > (zIp − A> A)−1 ν → −m(z) a.s., where
m(z) is the Stieltjes transform of the Marchenko-Pastur distribution Fγ,H .
A close examination of their proofs reveals that their result holds when v → 0 sufficiently slowly,
for instance v = n−α for α = 1/10. The reason is that all bounds in the proof have the rate N −k v −l
for some small k, l > 0, and hence they converge to 0 for v of the above form.
For instance, the very first bounds in the proof of Thm 1 of Bai et al. (2007) are in Eq. (2.2)
on page 1543. The first one states a bound of order O(1/N r ). The inequalities leading up to it
show that the bound is in fact O(1/(N r v 2r )). Similarly, the second inequality, stated with a bound
of order O(1/N r/2 ) is in fact O(1/(N r/2 v r )). These bounds go to zero when v = n−α with small
α > 0. In a similar way, the remaining bounds in the theorem have the same property.
To get the convergence for real t2 from the convergence for complex z = t2 + iv, we note that
|ν > (zIp − A> A)−1 ν − ν > (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 ν| = v|ν > (zIp − A> A)−1 (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 ν| ≤
≤ vk(t2 Ip − A> A)−1 k2 · u> u.
As discussed above, when t > b, the matrices (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 have a.s. bounded operator norm.
Hence, we conclude that if v → 0, then a.s.
ν > (zIp − A> A)−1 ν − ν > (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 ν → 0.
Finally, m(z) → m(t2 ) by the continuity of the Stieltjes transform for all t2 > 0 (Bai and
Silverstein, 2009). We conclude that ν > (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 ν → −m(t2 ) a.s. This finishes the analysis
of the last quadratic form.
5.1.4
Proof of Lemma 5.3
As in Lemma 5.2, it is enough to show the same concentration statements for A instead of N .
Parts 1 and 2: The proof of Part 1 and 2 are exactly analogous to those in Lemma 5.2. Indeed,
the same arguments work despite the change from (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 to (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 , because the
only properties we used are its independence from Z, and its a.s. bounded operator norm. These
also hold for (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 , so the same proof works.
Part 3: We start with the identity ν > N > (t2 In − N N > )−2 N ν = −ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 ν +
2 > 2
t ν (t Ip − N > N )−2 u. Since in Lemma 5.2 we have already established ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 ν →
−m(t2 ), we only need to show the convergence of ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 u.
For this we will employ the following derivative trick (see e.g., Dobriban and Wager, 2015). We
will construct a function with two properties: (1) its derivative is the quantity ν > (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 u
that we want, and (2) its limit is convenient to obtain. The following lemma will allow us to get
our answer by interchanging the order of limits:
Lemma 5.5 (see Lemma 2.14 in Bai and Silverstein (2009)). Let f1 , f2 , . . . be analytic on a domain
D in the complex plane, satisfying |fn (z)| ≤ M for every n and z in D. Suppose that there is an
analytic function f on D such that fn (z) → f (z) for all z ∈ D. Then it also holds that fn0 (z) → f 0 (z)
for all z ∈ D.
Accordingly, consider the function fp (r) = −ν > (rIp − N > N )−1 ν. Its derivative is fp0 (r) =
ν (rIp − N > N )−2 u. Let S := {x + iv : x > b + ε} for a sufficiently small ε > 0, and let us work on
>
33
the set of full measure where kN > N k < b+ε/2 eventually, and where fp (r) → m(r). By inspection,
fp are analytic functions on S bounded as |fp | ≤ 2/ε. Hence, by Lemma 5.5, fp0 (r) → m0 (r).
In conclusion, ν > N > (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 N ν → m(t2 ) + t2 m0 (t2 ), finishing the proof.
5.1.5
Proof of Thm. 2.1: Model (3)
The proof for model (3) is very similar to that for model (2). Therefore, we only present the outline.
Working again in the single-spiked case for simplicity, we have the following decomposition for the
observations Yi :
Yi = (µ + Σ1/2 Ei )Si + εi
= `1/2 zi µu + [µEi Si + εi ].
Denoting ν = µu/ξ 1/2 , where ξ = kµuk2 → τ , and ε∗i = µEi Si + εi , we have in matrix form
Y = (ξ`)1/2 Z̃ν > + E ∗ .
As in the proof of Lemma 5.1, it is not hard to see that the operator norm kE ∗ − Ekop → 0.
Therefore, the spectral properties of Y are equivalent to those of Ỹ = (ξ`)1/2 Z̃ν > + E. However,
this is now a spiked model where the signal component is independent of the noise component.
It follows immediately from Thm 4.3 of Bai and Silverstein (2009) that the singular value
distribution of E = [α1 , . . . , αn ]> Γ1/2 converges to the general Marchenko-Pastur distribution Fγ,G ,
where G is the limit of the distributions Gp of gj2 , j = 1, . . . , p. Similarly the top singular value of
E converges to the upper edge bG of Fγ,G .
Moreover, it also follows that the analogues of Lemmas 5.2 and 5.3 hold in our case. Indeed, the
same arguments carry through, because the same assumptions hold. This allows the entire argument
from Sec. 5.1.1 to carry through, finishing the single-spiked case of Thm. 2.1. The extension to the
multispiked case is analogous to that in model (2).
5.1.6
Numerical computation of the quantities from Thm. 2.1
Spectrode computes the Marchenko-Pastur forward map: given an input limit population spectrum H and an aspect ratio γ, it outputs an accurate numerical approximation to the limit empirical
spectral distribution (ESD) Fγ,H . Dobriban (2015) established the numerical convergence of the
method, and showed in experiments that it is much faster than previous proposals. The method is
publicly available at http://github.com/dobriban/eigenedge.
The output of Spectrode includes a numerical approximation m̂ to the Stieltjes transform m
of the limit ESD, computed over a dense grid xi on the real line. It also includes an approximation
b̂2 of the upper edge b2 of the ESD. From this, we compute an approximation of the D-transform
as D̂(xi ) = xi · m̂(xi ) · m̂(xi ), where m̂(xi ) = γ · m̂(xi ) + (γ − 1)/xi . Since D is monotone decreasing
on (b2 , ∞), we find the smallest grid point xi such that D̂(xi ) ≤ 1/` to approximately compute
D−1 (1/`).
Finally, the derivative m0 (x) can be expressed as a function m0 (x) = F(m(x)) by differentiating
the Marchenko-Pastur fixed-point equation (see e.g., Dobriban, 2015). Therefore, we compute a
numerical approximation to D0 (x) = m(x) · m(x) + x[m(x) · m0 (x) + m0 (x) · m(x)] by approximating
m̂0 (x) via the same function m̂0 (x) = F(m̂(x)). Similarly we approximate m̂0 . With these steps,
we obtain a full numerical implementation of Thm. 2.1.
34
5.2
Proof of Thm. 2.1 - Multispiked extension
1/2
Let us denote by ui = µui /ξi the normalized reduced signals, where ξiP
= kµui k2 → τi , and by
r
∗
1/2
εi = µεi +Σ Ei Xi . For the proof we start as in Sec. 5.1.1, obtaining Yi = k=1 (ξk `k )1/2 zik νk +ε∗i .
Defining the r × r diagonal matrices L, ∆ with diagonal entries `k , ξk (respectively), and the n × r,
p × r matrices Z, V, with columns Zk = n−1/2 (z1k , . . . , znk )> and uk respectively, we have
Ỹ = Z(∆L)1/2 U > + E ∗ .
The matrix Mn (t) is now 2r × 2r, and has the form
t · Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z Z > (t2 In − N N > )−1 N V
0r
Mn (t) =
−
V > N > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z t · V > (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 V
(∆L)−1/2
(∆L)−1/2
.
0r
It is easy to see that Lemma 5.1 still holds in this case. To find the limits of the entries of Mn , we
need the following additional statement.
Lemma 5.6 (Multispiked quadratic forms). The quadratic forms in the multispiked case have the
following properties for t > b:
1. Zk> Rα Zj → 0 a.s. for α = 1, 2, if k 6= j.
2. νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−α νj → 0 a.s. for α = 1, 2, if k 6= j.
This lemma is proved in Sec. 5.2.1, using similar techniques as those in Lemma 5.1. Defining
the r × r diagonal matrices T with diagonal entries τk , we conclude that for t > b, Mn (t) → M (t)
a.s., where now
−t · m(t2 )Ir −(T L)−1/2
.
M (t) =
−(T L)−1/2 −t · m(t2 )Ir
As before, by Lemma A.1 of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), we get that for τk `k >
1/D(b2 ), σk (Ỹ ) → tk a.s., where t2k · m(t2k )m(t2k ) = 1/(τk `k ). This finishes the spike convergence
proof.
To obtain the limit of the angles for ûk for a k such that `k > τk D(b2 ), consider the left singular
vectors Ẑk associated to σk (Ỹ ). Define the 2r-vector
(∆L)1/2 V > ûk
β
α= 1 =
.
β2
(∆L)1/2 Z > Ẑk
The vector α belongs to the kernel of Mn (σk (Ỹ )). As argued by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi
(2012), the fact that the projection of α into the orthogonal complement of M (tk ) tends to zero,
implies that αj → 0 for all j ∈
/ {k, k + r}. This proves that νj> ûk → 0 for j 6= k, and the analogous
claim for the left singular vectors.
The linear equation Mn (σk (Ỹ ))α = 0 in the k-th coordinate, where k ≤ r, reads (with t =
σk (Ỹ )):
X
tαk Zk> RZk − αr+k (ξk `k )−1/2 +
Mn (σk (Ỹ ))ik αk = 0.
i6=k
35
Only the first two terms are non-negligible due to the behavior of Mn , so we obtain tαk Zk> RZk =
αr+k (ξk `k )−1/2 + op (1). Moreover taking the norm of the equation Ẑk = R(tZβ1 + N Vβ2 ) (see
Lemma 5.1 in Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012)), we get
X
X
X
t2
αi αj Zi> R2 Zj +
αk+i αk+j νi> N > R2 N νj +
αi αk+j Zi R2 N νj = 1.
i,j≤r
i,j≤r
i,j≤r
2
From Lemma 5.6 and the discussion above, only the terms αk2 Zk> R2 Zk and αr+k
νk> N > R2 N νk are
non-negligible, so we obtain
2
t2 αk2 Zk> R2 Zk + αr+k
νk> N > R2 N νk = 1 + op (1).
Combining the two equations above,
Zk> R2 Zk
> > 2
2
+
ν
N
R
N
ν
αr+k
k = 1 + op (1).
k
ξk `k (Zk> RZk )2
Since this is the same equation as in the single-spiked case, we can take the limit in a completely
analogous way. This finishes the proof.
5.2.1
Proof of Lemma 5.6
As in Lemma 5.2, it is enough to show the same concentration statements for A instead of N .
Part 1: The convergence Zk> Rα Zj → 0 a.s. for α = 1, 2, if k 6= j, follows directly from the
following well-known lemma, cited from Couillet and Debbah (2011):
Lemma 5.7 (Proposition 4.1 in Couillet and Debbah (2011)). Let xn ∈ Rn and yn ∈ Rn be
independent sequences of random vectors, such that for each n the coordinates of xn and yn are
independent random variables. Moreover, suppose that the coordinates of xn are identically distributed with mean 0, variance C/n for some C > 0 and fourth moment of order 1/n2 . Suppose the
same conditions hold for yn , where the distribution of the coordinates of yn can be different from
those of xn . Let An be a sequence of n × n random matrices such that kAn k is uniformly bounded.
Then x>
n An yn →a.s. 0.
Part 2: To show νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−α νj → 0 a.s. for α = 1, 2, if k 6= j, the same technique
cannot be used, because the vectors uk are deterministic. However, it is straightforward to check
that the method of Bai et al. (2007) that we adapted in proving Part 3 of Lemma 5.2 extends to
proving νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 νj → 0. Indeed, it is easy to see that all their bounds hold unchanged.
In the final step, as a deterministic equivalent for νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 νj → 0, one obtains νk> (t2 Ip −
t2 m(t2 )Σ)−1 νj , which tends to 0 by our assumption, showing νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 νj → 0. Then
νk> (t2 Ip − N > N )−2 νj → 0 follows from the derivative trick employed in Part 3 of Lemma 5.3. This
finishes the proof.
5.3
Proof of Corollary 2.2
This corollary is a special case of our previous results, so the convergence results hold in this case.
We only need to check that the limits are given by the formulas provided. Since very similar analysis
has been performed by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) and Nadakuditi (2014), we only
give part of the proof.
36
Under model (2), since we consider the singular values of the normalized matrix m−1/2 Ỹ instead
of Ỹ as in Thm 2.1, it is easy to see that the relevant equation for the limiting singular values in
this case is t2 · m0 (t2 )m0R(t2 ) = 1/δ` instead of t2 · m(t2 )m(t2 ) = 1/τ `.
Note that m0 (t2 ) = (x − t2 )−1 dF γ,H (x) = γ · m0 (t2 ) + (γ − 1)t−2 . Thus the equation for t2
reads (γt2 m0 (t2 )+γ −1)m0 (t2 ) = (δ`)−1 . However, it is well-known that m0 (t2 ) obeys the equation
γt2 m20 + (t2 + γ − 1)m0 + 1 = 0. From these two relations we obtain t2 · m0 (t2 ) = −1 − 1/(δ`).
Plugging this back into the second equation and simplifying, we obtain t2 = (δ` + 1)(1 + γ/(δ`)),
as required. Finally, under model (3), the proof is analogous.
5.4
5.4.1
Proofs for covariance estimation
Proof of Cor. 3.2
From the spectral analysis of Y contained in Corollary 2.2 from Section 2 and the formula (10), the
proof of this corollary is immediate from the first part of the following lemma, proved below:
Lemma 5.8. We have the following limits (in operator norm) of the diagonals:
1. limn→∞ k diag(Σ̂Y ) − m · Ip k = 0 a.s.
2. limn→∞ k diag(Σ̂S ) − Ip k = 0 a.s.
First, note that the second statement is an immediate corollary of the first. In the proof of the
first statement, for notational convenience only, we will assume that r = 1; however, an identical
proof goes through for any fixed r. We will therefore drop the subscript k for the proof.
Decompose Xi into signal and noise, writing Xi = Si + εi , where Si = `1/2 zi u and Cov(ε) =
Ip , and Si and εi are independent. So if Si = (si1 , . . . , sip )> , Xi = (Xi1 , . . . , Xip )> , Yi =
(Yi1 , . . . , Yip )> , and εi = (εi1 , . . . , εip )> , we can write Yij = Dij Xij = Dij sij + Dij εij and con2 2
2
2 2
sequently Yij2 = Dij
sij + 2Dij
sij εij + Dij
εij .
th
The (i, i) element of diag(Σ̂Y ) is then
n
n
n
n
1X 2 2
1X
1X 2 2
1X 2
2
Yij =
Dij sij +
2Dij
sij εij +
D ε
n j=1
n j=1
n j=1
n j=1 ij ij
and we will controleach of the three
sums on the right side separately.
P
n
2 2
sij = m`u2i and so
Observe that E n1 j=1 Dij
X
n
1
1
log4B (n)
2 2
Dij sij = (E[d4 ]E[z 4 ]`2 u4i − m2 `u4i ) ≤ c
Var
n j=1
n
n3
where c > 0 is a constant. Chebyshev’s inequality then gives
X
n
1
p log4B (n)
2 2
2
2
P
Dij sij − m · ` · ui ≥ ε for some i ≤ c
.
n j=1
ε2 n3
Since u2i ≤ C logB (p)/p, this shows that n−1
p/n → γ.
Pn
j=1
37
2 2
Dij
sij converges a.s. to 0 as p, n → ∞ and
2 2
For the sum of terms Dij
εij , observe that En−1
Pn
j=1
2
2Dij
sij εij = 0, and
2
E|2Dij
sij εij |4 = 16E(d8 )`2 u4i ≤ c
log4B (n)
n2
√
where c > 0 is a constant and we have used the estimate |ui | ≤ C logB (p)/ p. By using Markov’s
inequality for the fourth moment (see Petrov (2012)), we then obtain:
X
n
1
log4B (n)
2
2Dij
P
sij εij ≥ ε for some i ≤ c 4 2 .
n j=1
ε n
Pn
2
s ε converges a.s. to 0 as p, n → ∞ and p/n → γ.
This proves that n−1 j=1 2Dij
Pn ij ij2 2
−1
2 2
2 2 4
8
8
Finally, to deal with n
j=1 Dij εij , observe that EDij εij = m, and that E|Dij εij | = Ed Eε
which is assumed finite. Therefore using again Markov’s inequality for the fourth moment,
X
n
1
Ed8 Eε8
2 2
P
Dij
εij − m ≥ ε for some i ≤ cp 4 4 .
n j=1
ε n
This proves that n−1
proof.
5.4.2
Pn
j=1
2 2
Dij
εij converges a.s. to 0 as p, n → ∞ and p/n → γ. This finishes the
Proof of (13)
The following analysis is adapted from that in Donoho et al. (2013). We start with a fact from
linear algebra.
Lemma 5.9. Suppose A and B are two p-by-p symmetric matrices, with eigenvectors u1 , . . . , up and
v1 , . . . , vp . Suppose that each one has eigenvalue 0 with multiplicity p−r for some 1 ≤ r < p/2, with
corresponding eigenvectors ur+1 , . . . , up and vr+1 , . . . , vp . Suppose that no eigenvector v1 , . . . , vr lies
in the span of u1 , . . . , ur . Then there is an orthogonal matrix W such that
W > AW = diag(`1 , . . . , `r ) ⊕ 0(p−r)×(p−r)
(36)
W > BW = B̃ ⊕ 0(p−2r)×(p−2r)
(37)
and
where B̃ is a 2r-by-2r matrix whose entries are continuous functions of the inner products u>
i vj ,
1 ≤ i, j ≤ r, on R2r \ {±1}r .
Furthermore,
if we assume in addition that u>
i vj = ci δi=j for some numbers ci ∈ (−1, 1), and
p
we let si = 1 − c2i , then the matrix B̃ is of the form:
diag(η1 c21 , . . . , ηr c2r )
diag(η1 c1 s1 , . . . , ηr cr sr )
diag(η1 c1 s1 , . . . , ηr cr sr )
diag(η1 s21 , . . . , ηr s2r )
Proof. Form vectors ṽ1 , . . . , ṽp−2r , by performing Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization of v1 , . . . , ṽp−2r
against the vectors u1 , . . . , ur . If the columns of W are the vectors in this basis, then clearly (36)
holds, since Auk = `k uk for k = 1, . . . , r, and Aṽk = 0 for k = 1, . . . , p − 2r. Furthermore, since
38
Bṽk = 0 for k = r + 1, . . . , p − 2r, (37) holds for some 2r-by-2r block B̃. We need only check that
2r
the entries of B̃ are continuous functions of u>
\ {±1}r .
i vj , 1 ≤ i, j ≤ r, on R
Let W2r denote the p-by-2r matrix containing the first 2r columns of W , Ur denote the matrix
with columns u1 , . . . , ur , Vr denote the matrix with columns v1 , . . . , vr , and Ṽr the matrix with
columns ṽ1 , . . . , ṽr . We can therefore write W2r = [Ur Ṽr ];
By the Gram-Schmidt construction, every vector vk , k = 1, . . . , r, can be written as a linear
combination of the vectors u1 , . . . , ur , ṽ1 , . . . , ṽk ; in matrix form, these linear combinations can be
expressed as:
Vr = Ur (Ur> Vr ) + Ṽr (Ṽ > Vr )
Now, we observe that the 2r-by-2r block B̃ is
>
U V
>
W2r
BW2r = r>
diag(η1 , . . . , ηr )[Ur> V Ṽr> V ]
Ṽr V
We need only show that the entries of Ṽr> Vr are continuous functions of the inner products
1 ≤ i, j ≤ r. Let R = Ṽr> V . Then Rk,l = 0 whenever k > l. When k = l, we have:
v
u
r
k−1
u
X
X
2−
(u>
v
)
(ṽi> vk )2
Rk,k = ṽk> vk = t1 −
i k
u>
i vj ,
i=1
i=1
and when k < l we have
Rk,l =
−
Pr
Pk−1 >
>
>
>
i=1 (ui vl )(ui vk ) +
i=1 (ṽi vl )(ṽi vk )
Pr
.
kvk − i=1 (u>
i vk )uk k
Since for any l = 2, . . . , r, we have
R1,l =
ṽ1> vl
Pr
− i=1 (u>
v1 )(u> vl )
Pr i > i
=
kv1 − i=1 (ui v1 )ui k
which is obviously a continuous function of the inner products v1> ui on Rr \ {±1}r , an induction
argument easily shows all entries of R are continuous in the inner products u>
k vl .
Finally, if u>
v
=
c
δ
,
the
final
assertion
follows
immediately,
finishing
the proof.
j
i
i=j
i
If we apply the permutation π2r = (1, r + 1, 2, r + 2, . . . , r, 2r) to L
the rows and columns of the
r
block matrix B̃ from Lemma 5.9, the corresponding matrix becomes i=1 B2 (ηi , ci , si ) where
2
ηc ηcs
B2 (η, c, s) =
.
(38)
ηcs ηs2
Applying the same permutation to the top 2r-by-2r
block of the matrix A from Lemma 5.9 turns
Lr
` 0
this block into:
.
i=1 A2 (`i ) where A2 (`) =
0 0
Now, let B̃ be given by the formula (38), but where c = ci = c(δ`i ) is the asymptotic inner
product between the population eigenvector ui and the empirical eigenvector ûi , and η = ηi = η(λi )
is the almost sure limit of the ith eigenvalue η(λ̂i ) of Σ̂ηS . Since the shrinkers η collapse the vicinity
39
of the bulk to 0, it follows from Cor. 3.1 that the shrunken estimator has rank at most r a.s. Hence,
by Lemma 5.9 and Cor. 3.1, if Lp (A, B) is any orthogonally-invariant loss function that decomposes
over blocks, we have the almost sure convergence of Lp (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) to the quantity
L∞ (ΣS , Σ̂ηS ) = L2r
M
r
A2 (`k ),
k=1
r
M
B2 (η(λk ), ck , sk ) .
k=1
This is the desired result.
5.4.3
Proof of Props. 3.3
We will only provide a proof for the reduced-noise model; the proof for the unreduced-model is
2
2
even simpler. Define the operator Lp acting
Pnon p-by-p matrices by Lp (Σ) = µ Σ + σ diag(Σ)
1
and define the operator Lp by Lp (Σ) = n k=1 Dk ΣDk . Also, define define the p-by-p matrices
Pn
Bp = Σ̂Y − n1 k=1 Dk2 and Bp = Σ̂Y − mIp .
Let ∆Bp = Bp − Bp , and ∆Lp = Lp − Lp . The operator ∆Lp taking p-by-p matrices to p-by-p
matrices is diagonal. In this proof, when we refer to the (i, j)th diagonal entry of a diagonal operator
on Rp×p , we mean the entry that multipliesPthe (i, j)th coordinate of a matrix. When i 6= j, the
n
2
−1
th
(i, j)th diagonal entry of ∆L
diagonal
k=1 Di,k Dj,k Σij ; and when i = j, the (i, i)
Pnp (Σ) is2 µ −n
−1
.
entry of ∆Lp is m − n
D
k=1 i,k
A proof nearly identical to the proof of Cor. 3.1 shows that the maximum of all the p2 diagonal
entries of ∆Lp converges almost surely to 0; in other words, if Rp×p is equipped with Frobenius
norm, then the operator norm of ∆Lp : Rp×p → Rp×p converges to 0 almost surely.
Pn
The p-by-p matrix ∆Bp is diagonal, with ith diagonal entry equal to m − n−1 k=1 Dk,i . Again,
a proof like the proof of Cor. 3.1 shows that the supremum of these elements converges to zero
almost surely as n, p → ∞.
Also, note that √
the Frobenius norm of the matrix Σ̂S , which is the sum of squares of its eigenvalues, is of size ≈ n. To see this, observe that
p
p−r
1X
1X
1
1
kΣ̂S k2F =
σk (Σ̂S )2 =
σk (Σ̂S )2 +
n
n
n
n
k=1
k=1
p
X
σk (Σ̂S )2 .
k=p−r+1
Pp−r
The first term n1 k=1 σk (Σ̂S )2 converges almost surely to the second moment of the MarchenkoPp
Pastur law, which is finite since the distribution has finite support. The second term n1 k=p−r+1 σk (Σ̂S )2
converges to 0.
Observe that
Lp (Σ̂S ) − ∆Lp (Σ̂S ) = Lp (Σ̂S ) = Bp = Bp + ∆Bp = Lp (Σ̂0S ) + ∆Bp
or in other words,
Σ̂S − Σ̂0S
kΣ̂S k
=
L−1
p (∆Lp Σ̂S )
kΣ̂S k
The result follows immediately.
40
−
L−1
p (∆Bp )
kΣ̂S k
.
5.5
Proof that BLP is asymptotically diagonalized in PC basis (Sec. 4.1)
Pr
Pr
−1
First, it is easy to check that Cov [Si , Yi ] = µ k=1 `k uk u>
= [µ2 j=1 `j uj u>
j +
k , and M = Cov [Yi , Yi ]
Pr
Pr
mIp +E]−1 , where E = σ 2 j=1 `j diag(uj uj ). Therefore the BLP equals ŜiBLP = µ k=1 `k uk u>
M
Yi .
k
Moreover, since uj are delocalized, the operator norm kEk → 0, so that it is easy to check that
kŜiBLP − Ŝi0 k2 → 0, where
r
X
Ŝi0 = µ
`k uk u>
k M0 Yi ,
k=1
Pr
>
−1
and M0 = [µ
. Therefore, it is enough to show that kŜi0 − Ŝi k2 → 0, where
j=1 `j uj uj + mIp ]
P
r
>
2
recall that Ŝi = k=1 µ`k /(µ2 `k +m)uk u>
k Yi . We can write, with mk = uk (M0 −Ip /(µ `k +m))Yi .
2
kŜi0 − Ŝi k2 = kµ
= kµ
r
X
k=1
r
X
`k uk u>
k M0 Yi −
`k uk mk k2 = µ2
k=1
r
X
2
µ`k /(µ2 `k + m)uk u>
k Yi k
k=1
r
X
`k `j mk mj u>
k uj .
k,j=1
Therefore, to show kŜi0 − Ŝi k2 → 0, it is enough to show mk → 0. For this, using the formula
u> (uu> + T )−1 = u> T −1 /(1 + u> T −1 u), we can write
−1
−1
−1
r
r
r
X
X
X
2 >
2
µ2
= u>
µ2
/
uk
u>
`j uj u>
`j uj u>
` j uj u>
1 + µ uk µ
.
k
j + mIp
k
j + mIp
j + mIp
j=1
j6=k
j6=k
Under the assumptions of Cor. 2.2, we have u>
k uj → δkj , hence it is easy to see that the
denominator converges a.s. to 1 + µ2 /m. Indeed by using the formula (V V > + mI)−1 = [I −
1/2
1/2
V (V > V + mI)−1 V > ]/m, for V = µ[`1 u1 , . . . , `r ur ] (excluding uk )
−1
r
X
>
>
−1 >
µ2
uk = u>
u>
`j uj u>
V uk /m.
k
j + mI
k uk /m − uk V (V V + mI)
j6=k
Now the entries of the r − 1-dimensional vector vk = V > uk are µ`1/2 u>
j uk for j 6= k. Therefore,
>
−1
they converge to zero a.s. Since the operator norm of (V V + mI) is bounded above by 1/m,
this shows that the second term converges to zero a.s. This shows that the denominator converges
to 1 + µ2 /m a.s. Finally, by using the formula (V V > + mI)−1 = [I − V (V > V + mI)−1 V > ]/m once
again, we conclude similarly that
−1
r
X
>
>
−1 >
µ2
Yi = u>
`j uj u>
V Yi /m.
u>
k
j + mI
k Yi /m − uk V (V V + mI)
j6=k
h
Denoting Mk = µ2
Pr
>
j6=k `j uj uj + I
i−1
u>
u>
u>
k Yi /m
k Yi
k Mk Yi
−
=
mk =
>
m
1 + uk Mk uk 1 + µ2 /m · `k
, we have
> >
1
1
vk (V V + mI)−1 vk /m
−
−
.
>
1 + µ2 /m · `k
1 + uk Mk uk
1 + u>
k Mk uk
41
Based on our previous calculations, both terms tend to 0, implying mk → 0. Therefore, we have
kŜiBLP − Ŝi k2 → 0. By the triangle inequality, this immediately implies that all MSE properties
for ŜiBLP also hold for Ŝi . This proves the desired claim.
5.6
5.6.1
Proof of Thm. 4.1
BLP
For the BLP, consider first the single-spiked case where the squared prediction error of Ŝiτ = Ŝiτ,B =
τ uu> Yi , with Yi = Di (Si + εi ) = Di (`1/2 zi u + εi ) is
kSi − Ŝiτ k2 = k`1/2 zi u − τ u> Yi uk2 = (`1/2 zi − τ u> Yi )2 = [`1/2 zi − τ (`1/2 zi u> Di u + u> Di εi )]2
= (1 − τ u> Di u)2 `zi2 + τ 2 (u> Di εi )2 − 2τ (1 − τ u> Di εi )`1/2 zi u> Di εi .
Now, zi and εi are independent of Di , hence, conditional on Di we have
E[kSi − Ŝiτ k2 |Di ] = (1 − τ u> Di u)2 ` + τ 2 u> Di2 u.
Moreover, Eu> Di u = µ, E(u> Di u)2 = µ2 + σ 2 kuk44 → µ2 —since u is delocalized—and Eu> Di2 u =
m, so the overall expectation converges to EkSi − Ŝiτ k2 → (1 − 2τ µ + τ 2 µ2 )` + τ 2 m.
This proves that the asymptotic MSE of BLP is AM SE B (τ ; `, γ) = (1 − τ µ)2 ` + τ 2 m. The
minimum is achieved for τ ∗ = µ`/(µ2 ` + m), and equals m`/(µ2 ` + m).
In the multispiked case, the prediction error is
kSi − Ŝiτ k2 = k
r
X
1/2
2
`k zik uk − τk u>
k Yi uk k
k=1
=
r
X
1/2
2
(`k zik − τk u>
k Yi ) +
k=1
X
1/2
1/2
>
>
(`k zik − τk u>
k Yi )(`j zij − τj uj Yi ) · uk uj
k6=j
Now, zik , zij are independent if k 6= j, hence we have if k 6= j
1/2
1/2
>
>
>
E(`k zik − τk u>
k Yi )(`j zij − τj uj Yi ) = τk τj Euk Yi uj Yi .
Using Yi = Di Xi , Xi =
have
1/2
k=1 `k zik uk
Pr
+ εi , and the independence properties described above, we
>
>
>
>
Eu>
k Yi uj Yi = Euk Di Xi Xi Di uj = Euk Di (
r
X
`m um u>
m + Ip )Di uj
m=1
=
=
r
X
m=1
r
X
>
> 2
`m · E(u>
k Di um · uj Di um ) + Euk Di uj
>
2
`m · [µ2 (u>
k um ) · (uj um ) + σ (uk
um )> · (uj
um )] + mu>
k uj .
m=1
Above we denoted by c = a b the vector with entries cj = aj bj . Since the vectors uk are delocalized
and we assumed u>
k ul → 0 for k 6= l, it is easy to see that the entire expression converges to zero.
42
This shows that
EkSi − Ŝiτ k2 − E
r
X
1/2
2
(`k zik − τk u>
k Yi ) → 0.
k=1
Therefore, the asymptotic MSE decouples over the different PCs. Therefore, we can use our previous
results about the asymptotic MSE in the single-spiked model, as soon as we can show that the same
formulas for the MSE of specific coordinates given in Sec. 5.6.1 hold in this setting. However, this
is easy to see using a calculation similar to the one given above. Indeed, we have
X
1/2
1/2
2
>
>
>
2
E(`k zik − τk u>
τk `1/2
k Yi ) = E(`k (1 − τk uk Di uk )zik −
m zim uk Di um − τk uk Di εi )
m6=k
= `k E(1 −
2
τk u>
k Di uk )
+
τk2
X
2
2
> 2
`m E(u>
k Di um ) + τk Euk Di uk .
m6=k
2
2 >
2
2
For k 6= m, the term E(u>
um k2 → 0, while the other terms can
k Di um ) = µ (uk um ) + σ kuk
be evaluated as before, leading to the same formulas. Therefore, the asymptotic limit of the MSE
is the same as that in the single-spiked case. This finishes the claims about BLP.
5.6.2
Empirical BLP
The squared error of a general EBLP denoiser is
kSi − Ŝiη k2 = k
r
X
1/2
`k zik uk −
=
2
ηk ûk û>
k Yi k
k=1
k=1
r
X
r
X
1/2
2
k`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
k Yi k +
k=1
X 1/2
> 1/2
>
(`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
k Yi ) (`j zij uj − ηj ûj ûj Yi )
k6=j
The following lemma, proved in Sec. 5.6.3, shows that the cross terms vanish:
Lemma 5.10 (Vanishing cross term in MSE). The cross terms in the MSE of EBLP denoisers
1/2
> 1/2
>
vanish, i.e., for all k 6= j, E(`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
k Yi ) (`j zij uj − ηj ûj ûj Yi ) → 0
Therefore, the limit of the MSE in the multispiked case decouples into the MSEs for the individual spikes:
r
X
1/2
2
Ek`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
EkSi − Ŝiη k2 −
k Yi k → 0.
k=1
To evaluate the limiting MSE, we rely on the following lemma (proved in Sec. 5.7), which finds
limiting expectations of inner products of the empirical singular vector ûB with the samples Yi and
the population singular vector u.
Lemma 5.11 (Denoising risk limit). We have the following convergences:
2
2
2
2
1. E(û>
k Yi ) → mλk , where λk = t (δ`k ; γ) is defined in Eq. (7).
1/2
>
2
2
2
2. Ezi (û>
k Yi )(uk ûk ) → µ`k ck · βk , where ck = c (δ`k ; γ) is defined in Eq. (8), and
β =1+
43
γ
.
δ`k
(39)
The key technical innovation is the proof of the second part. The main argument is an extension
of the technique introduced by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) for characterizing the limits
of the inner products u>
j ûk between population and sample eigenvectors. For our proof, we need
to extend this technique to characterize limits w> ûk for arbitrary random vectors w. Since this
technique relies on an equation for the “outliers” among the eigenvalues of a finite-rank perturbation
of a matrix in the terminology commonly used in random matrix theory (see e.g., Tao, 2013), we
call this the outlier equation method.
Applying the outlier equation method is nontrivial in our case, because the random vectors w
to which we need to apply it—e.g., Xi —are dependent with ûk . For this reason, we need to use
rank-one perturbation formulas once again to show that the dependence is negligible. We envision
that the proof method could have several other applications.
Going back to our main argument,
Pr based on Lemma 5.11, the limit of the MSE is the following
deterministic quantity: AM SE = k=1 `k + ηk2 · mt2k − 2ηk · µ`k c2k · βk . The optimal η minimizing
the AMSE has ηk∗ = µ`k c2k · βk /[mt2k ] = µ`k c2k /[m(1 + δ`k )]. This finishes the EBLP analysis.
5.6.3
Proof of Lemma 5.10
1/2
1/2
>
>
We need to show that E(`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
k Yi ) (`j zij uj − ηj ûj ûj Yi ) → 0. We expand the paran1/2
1/2
theses and note that the first term is E(`k zik uk )> `j zij uj = 0, while the last term is a multiple
>
>
>
of Eû>
k ûj · ûk Yi · ûj Yi = 0 (because ûk ûj = 0 for k 6= j). Thus it is enough to show the following
claim for k 6= j:
>
Ezij û>
k uj · ûk Yi → 0
>
For this, we have u>
k ûj → 0 a.s., by Cor. 2.2, thus also zij uk ûj → 0, so by convergence reduction
2
(Lemma 5.12) it is enough to show that E(û>
Y
)
is
uniformly
bounded. However, as in the proof
k i
2
Y
)
is
uniformly bounded. This finishes
of Part 1 of Lemma 5.11 in Sec. 5.7.1, we obtain that E(û>
k i
the proof of Lemma 5.10.
5.7
Proof of Lemma 5.11
For simplicity of exposition, we first prove the single-spiked case, when r = 1. The extension to the
multispiked case is presented in Sec. 5.9.
5.7.1
Part 1
Similar to Lee et al. (2010) in the unreduced case, we use the following exchangeability argument:
E(û> Yi )2 = Eû> Yi Yi> û = n−1
n
X
Eû> Yi Yi> û = n−1 Eû> Y > Y û = Eσ1 (Ỹ )2 .
i=1
Now σ1 (Ỹ )2 → m · λ(δ`; γ) a.s. by Cor. 2.2. Moreover, by a bound on the expectation of top
eigenvalues of sample covariance matrices such as that in Srivastava and Vershynin (2013), it is
easy to see that Eσ1 (Ỹ )2 is uniformly bounded. Hence, Eσ1 (Ỹ )2 → m · λ(δ`; γ), finishing the proof.
44
5.7.2
Part 2
As a preliminary remark for Part 2, denoting t2 = λ(δ`; γ) we note that β = 1 + γ/(δ`) = 1 − m ·
γm(t2 )/[1 + m · γm(t2 )]. By a simple calculation, this is equivalent to m · m(t2 ) = −1/(γ + δ`).
This can be checked as in the proof of Cor. 2.2 in Sec. 5.3.
Therefore it is enough to show that
−m · γm(t2 )
−m · γm(t2 )
>
>
1/2 2
1/2 2
1/2 2
Ezi (û Yi )(u û) → ` c µ +
=
µ`
c
+
`
c
·
.
1 + m · γm(t2 )
1 + m · γm(t2 )
Expanding by using Yi = Di Xi , Xi = `1/2 zi u + εi , we have
Ezi (û> Yi )(u> û) = `1/2 Ezi2 (û> Di u)(u> û) + Ezi (û> Di εi )(u> û).
Ezi2 (û> Di u)(u> û)
>
(40)
>
→ µc and Ezi (û Di εi )(u û) → `1/2 ·
Therefore, it is enough to show that
2
2
c · [−m · γm(t )]/[1 + m · γm(t )]. Since we already know that (u> û)2 → c2 a.s., our first step is to
reduce these two claims by “getting rid” of the u> û term. For this and similar arguments, we will
rely repeatedly on the following simple lemma:
2
2
Lemma 5.12 (Convergence Reduction). Suppose Wn ,Yn are random variables such that EWn → D
for a constant D, EWn2 is uniformly bounded, Yn → C a.s. for some constant C, and Yn is a.s.
uniformly bounded. Then EWn Yn → DC.
In the special case when C = 0, the statement EWn → D is not needed.
Proof. We have EWn Yn = EWn (Yn − C) + CEWn , so it is enough to show EWn (Yn − C) → 0.
Therefore we can assume without loss of generality that C = 0. In that case,
|EWn Yn | ≤ |EWn2 |1/2 |EYn2 |1/2 ≤ MW |EYn2 |1/2 → 0,
because EWn2 are uniformly bounded; and because Yn → 0 a.s. and Yn are bounded, so E(Yn )2 → 0
by the dominated convergence theorem. Clearly, once we assumed C = 0 we did not use EWn → D.
This finishes the proof.
To use this lemma, let us choose the orientation of û such that u> û ≥ 0. Therefore, we know
from our main results (e.g., Thm. 2.1), that u> û → c a.s. Moreover, since kûk = 1, it is easy to see
that we can apply Lemma 5.12 to both terms in (40). Specifically, for the first term, we apply it
with Wn = zi2 (û> Di u) and Yn = u> û; while for the second term we apply it with Wn = zi (û> Di εi )
and Yn = u> û. As mentioned above, this effectively removes the u> û terms, and thus simplifies the
analysis considerably. Indeed, by Lemma 5.12 we conclude that Part 2 follows from the following
auxiliary convergence results, proved in Sec. 5.8:
Lemma 5.13 (Denoising risk auxiliary limits: Part 2). We have the following convergence results:
1. Ezi2 (û> Di u) → µc, where c2 is defined in Eq. (8).
2
−m·γm(t )
2
2. Ezi (û> Di εi ) → `1/2 · c · 1+m·γm(t
is defined in Eq. (7), and m is the Stieltjes
2 ) , where t
transform of the standard Marchenko-Pastur law.
Based on the above lemma, we completed the proof of Part 2 of Lemma 5.11. We will prove
Part 1 of Lemma 5.11 later in Sec. 5.7.1, because it re-uses many of the techniques and results
established in the proof of Part 1. This finishes the proof of Lemma 5.11.
45
5.8
Proof of Lemma 5.13
In this lemma, we need to understand the asymptotics of inner products such as u> Di û. Previous
results by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) characterized the asymptotics of the cosines
u> û. However, these results do not allow us to understand the asymptotics of the inner products
u> Di û, due to the dependence of û and Di . Instead, we must go back to first principles, and extend
the outlier equation technique introduced by Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012) to our setting.
We will see that the current case is more challenging than the one handled in Benaych-Georges and
Nadakuditi (2012).
Let us recall the notation from Sec. 5.1.1. According to (34), the normalized data matrix
m−1/2 Ỹ = (nm)−1/2 Y can be written as m−1/2 Ỹ = `1/2 · Zu> + N . Note here that u = ν. Let here
t = tp be the singular value of m−1/2 Ỹ with left and right singular vectors Ẑ, û, and suppose that t
is not a singular value of N . As in Lemmas 4.1 and 5.1 of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012),
we then have the following outlier equation that provides an equation for the singular vectors of
the perturbed matrix m−1/2 Ỹ :
1 Ẑ
t · (t2 In − N N > )−1 (t2 In − N N > )−1 N (u> û) · Z
(41)
=
N > (t2 In − N N > )−1 t · (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 (Z > Ẑ) · u
`1/2 û
The idea is to take inner products of the right hand side with the quantity we want to characterize
(e.g., inner product with Di u to understand u> Di û), and then evaluate the limit of the quantities
on the left hand side. This extends the technique of Benaych-Georges and Nadakuditi (2012), who
took inner products only with the population and sample singular vectors (u and û). In contrast, by
using other vectors, such as Di u and Di εi , we are able to extend vastly the reach of their technique.
To formalize this, let w be a p-dimensional vector. By taking the inner product of the outlier
equation’s last p coordinates with w, we obtain the following scalar equation:
(u> û) · w> N > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z + t(Z > Ẑ) · w> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 u =
1
`1/2
w> û.
(42)
Therefore, we can formalize the outlier equation technique as follows:
Lemma 5.14 (Outlier equation method). Under the assumptions of Cor. 2.2, suppose that û, Ẑ
are chosen so that û> u ≥ 0, Ẑ > Z ≥ 0. Suppose moreover that w = wp is a sequence of random
vectors such that the assumptions of Lemma 5.12 for Wn apply to Wn1 = w> N > (t2 In − N N > )−1 Z
and Wn2 = w> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 u. Specifically, suppose that EWn1 → w1∗ and EWn2 → w2∗ . Then
the random variables w> û also converge in expectation, namely
Ew> û → `1/2 (c(δ`; γ)w1∗ + t · c̃(δ`; γ)w2∗ ).
(43)
Here c ≥ 0 where c2 is defined in Eq. (8), while c̃(δ`; γ) ≥ 0 is the limit cosine between Z, Ẑ,
c̃(`; γ)2 = (1 − γ/`2 )/(1 + 1`) if ` > γ 1/2 and c̃2 = 0 otherwise.
As an important special case, suppose that w2∗ = −κm(t2 ), while w1∗ = 0. Then
Ew> û → κc.
(44)
Proof. The first part follows from the discussion before the lemma. For the second part, from
Lemma 5.2, it folows that for w = u, we have Ew> (t2 Ip − N > N )−1 u → −m(t2 ), so that in this
case the claim holds with κ = 1. For other vectors w, the result follows by linearity.
An analogous version of Lemma 5.14 holds with convergence in expectation replaced by convergence a.s. Next, we will use this lemma to prove the two parts of Lemma 5.13.
46
5.8.1
Part 1
Recall the notation R = (t2 In −N N > )−1 and define R̃ = (t2 Ip −N > N )−1 . To show Ezi2 (û> Di u) →
µc, we use Lemma 5.14 with the sequence of vectors w = zi2 Di u. To conclude our result by the
second part of Lemma 5.14, it is enough to establish the following claims
1. Ezi2 u> Di N > RZ → 0
2. Ezi2 u> Di R̃u → −µ · m(t2 ).
Claim 1 : As in the Proof of Lemma 5.1 in Sec. 5.1.2, we can write N = A + E ∗∗ , where E ∗∗ is
independent of z and kE ∗∗ k → 0. Therefore, it is easy to see that it is enough to prove the claim with
N replaced by A. Let us define R(A) = (t2 In − AA> )−1 . Then, as in the proof of Part 2 of Lemma
5.2 in Sec. 5.1.3, we obtain u> Di A> R(A)Z → 0 a.s. Clearly, these random variables are bounded
a.s., since by the proof of Lemma 5.1, R(A) has a.s. uniformly bounded operator norm. Therefore,
by the convergence reduction Lemma 5.12 applied to Wn = zi and Yn = u> Di A> R(A)Z—valid
since Ezi2 = 1 and Ezi4 is uniformly bounded—we conclude that Ezi2 u> Di A> R(A)Z → 0. As
discussed, this implies the desired Claim 1.
Claim 2 : As in Claim 1, it is enough to prove the result with N replaced by A. From now
on in this claim, we will only work with A, not N ; therefore, we denote for brevity R = R(A),
R̃ = R̃(A) = (t2 Ip − A> A)−1 (and no confusion will arise). Also similarly to Claim 1, it will be
enough to prove that u> Di R̃u → −µm(t2 ) a.s.
For this, note that Di of course depends on the i-th data vector Yi = Di Xi . Therefore, we cannot
use the concentration of quadratic forms directly. However, since the only dependence occurs in
the i-th sample, we can use a rank-one perturbation formula to separate the i-th sample, and then
control the two resulting terms separately.
P
−1
For this, we define aj = n−1/2 Dj εj to be the rows of A, so that R̃ = (t2 Ip − j aj a>
. We
j )
P
2
> −1
also define the perturbed matrix R̃i = (t Ip − j6=i aj aj ) . By the matrix inversion formula
(M + aa> )−1 = M −1 − M −1 aa> M −1 /(1 + a> M −1 a), we have
R̃ = R̃i +
R̃i ai a>
i R̃i
>
1 − ai R̃i ai
(45)
Therefore,
u> Di R̃u = u> Di R̃i u +
(u> Di R̃i ai ) · (u> R̃i ai )
.
1 − a>
i R̃i ai
(46)
>
>
2
As in the proof of Part
P 3 of Lemma 5.2 in Sec. 5.1.3, we obtain u Di R̃i u + u Di u · m(t ) → 0 a.s.
However, u> Di u = j u2j Fj , where Fj are iid random variables with mean µ = EDij . Hence, it is
easy to see that u> Di u → µ a.s. This shows that the first term in (46) converges to −µ · m(t2 ) a.s.
and in expectation.
It remains to show that the second term in (46) converges to 0 in expectation. Since 1/(1 −
>
>
a>
i R̃i ai ) is uniformly bounded a.s., it is enough to show that E(u Di R̃i ai )·(u R̃i ai ) → 0. However,
>
>
by independence of εi from Di , R̃i , we have E(u Di R̃i ai ) · (u R̃i ai ) = n−1 Eu> Di R̃i Di2 R̃i u =
O(n−1 ) a.s., showing the desired claim. This finishes the proof of Claim 2, and hence that of Part
1 of Lemma 5.13.
47
5.8.2
Part 2
For Part 2 of Lemma 5.13, we need to show that Ezi (û> Di εi ) → −`1/2 · cm · γm(t2 )/[1 + m · γm(t2 )].
Using the Outlier Equation method, Lemma 5.14, as in Part 1, with the sequence of vectors w =
zi Di εi , it is enough to establish the following claims
>
1. Ezi ε>
i Di N RZ →
−m·γm(t2 )
1+m·γm(t2 )
2. Ezi ε>
i Di R̃u → 0.
As before, we can work with A instead of N , and with R, R̃ being the resolvents of A. The
second claim follows immediately, because zi is independent of ε>
i Di R̃u, since R̃ does not depend
>
on zi . Therefore, Ezi ε>
D
R̃u
=
Ez
Eε
D
R̃u
=
0.
i
i
i
i
i
P
1/2
For the first claim, noting that A> R = R̃A> , and expanding A> Z =
, where
j zj aj /n
−1/2
aj = n
Dj εj , we can write
X
>
>
>
2 >
Ezi ε>
Ezi zj ε>
i Di A RZ = Ezi εi Di R̃A Z = Ezi εi Di R̃ai +
i Di R̃aj
j6=i
=n
−1
Eε>
i Di R̃Di εi
=
Ea>
i R̃ai
since zi are independent of ε, R̃, and have mean 0. To control this last term, we use a technique
similar to that in Sec. 5.8.1. Using the rank one perturbation formula (45), and denoting βi =
−1 >
a>
εi Di R̃i Di εi , we find
i R̃i ai = n
>
a>
i R̃ai = ai R̃i ai +
2
βi
(a>
i R̃i ai )
=
.
1 − βi
1 − βi
By independence and the concentration of quadratic forms, βi − n−1 m · tr(R̃i ) → 0, while by the
Marchenko-Pastur law, n−1 tr(R̃i ) → −γ · m(t2 ). By the convergence reduction lemma, Ea>
i R̃ai →
−m · γm(t2 )/[1 + m · γm(t2 )] This finishes the proof of Part 2 of Lemma 5.13. Therefore, the proof
of Lemma 5.13 is complete.
5.9
Multispiked EBLP MSE
We now show that the formulas from Lemma 5.11 are also valid in the multispiked case. Indeed,
1/2
1/2
2
2
>
2
>
>
Ek`k zik uk − ηk ûk û>
k Yi k = `k + ηk E(ûk Yi ) − 2ηk `k Ezik (ûk Yi )(uk ûk ).
We have already showed in the proof of Lemma 5.10 that the limit of the second term is the same
as in the single-spiked case. It remains to characterize the third term. For this, we follow a similar
pattern to that used in the proof of Lemma 5.10 in Sec. 5.7, using the multispiked outlier equation.
We sketch the argument below.
As in the proof of Thm. 2.1 in Sec. 5.2, the normalized data matrix m−1/2 Ỹ = (nm)−1/2 Y can
be written as m−1/2 Ỹ = ZL1/2 U > + N , where Z is the n × r matrix with entries zik , U is the n × r
matrix with columns uk , while and L is the r × r diagonal matrix with entries `k . Let tk be the
singular value of m−1/2 Ỹ with left and right singular vectors Ẑk , ûk , and suppose that tk is not a
singular value of N . The multispiked outlier equation is now:
Z · L1/2 · (U > ûk )
tk · (t2k In − N N > )−1 (t2k In − N N > )−1 N
Ẑ
= k
(47)
N > (t2k In − N N > )−1 tk · (t2k Ip − N > N )−1 U · L1/2 · (Z > Ẑk )
ûk
48
For a sequence of random vectors w = wp , denoting the r-vectors Wn1 = w> N > (t2k In −
N N > )−1 Z and Wn2 = w> (t2k Ip − N > N )−1 u, the analogue of Eq. (42) is obtained by taking
the inner product of the last p coordinates of the multispiked equation with w:
Wn1 · L1/2 · (U > ûk ) + tk · Wn2 · L1/2 · (Z > Ẑk ) = w> ûk
The outlier equation method formalized in Lemma 5.14 also extends in the natural way, by taking
the limits of the above equation.
Going back to our main argument about EBLP risks, it remains only to characterize the
>
limit of Ezik (û>
k Yi )(uk ûk ). By the convergence reduction lemma, it is enough to show that
1/2
>
Ezik (ûk Yi ) → µ`k ck βk , where ck ≥ 0 is the cosine, while βk = 1 + γ/(δ`k ). Examining closely
the proof of Lemma 5.13, we see that all claims hold unchanged, and the proofs go through either
unchanged or with minimal modifications (similar to the extension of the spike behavior to the
multispiked case). We omit the details.
5.10
Proof of Thm. 4.3
Similarly to our previous calculations, the MSE equals
Enη,o = EkS0 − Ŝ0η k2 =
r
X
1/2
2
Ek`k z0k uk − ηk ûk û>
k Y0 k
k=1
+
X
1/2
1/2
>
>
E(`k z0k uk − ηk ûk û>
k Y0 ) (`j z0j uj − ηj ûj ûj Y0 ).
k6=j
The cross terms vanish because z0k are independent zero-mean random variables, and û>
k ûj = 0.
To find the limit, we expand the main term as follows:
1/2
1/2
2
2
>
2
>
>
Ek`k z0k uk − ηk ûk û>
k Y0 k = `k + ηk E(ûk Y0 ) − 2ηk `k Ez0k (ûk Y0 )(uk ûk )
Now, because Y0 are independent of ûj , we can take expectation over the randomess in Y0 to see
that
r
r
X
X
>
> 2
2
Eû>
µ
` j uj u>
`j diag(uj uj ) ûk
k Y0 · ûk Y0 = Eûk
j + mIp + σ
j=1
= m + µ2
r
X
2
2
`j E(û>
k uj ) + σ
j=1
j=1
r
X
`j Eû>
k diag(uj
uj )ûk → m + µ2 `k c2k .
j=1
On the last line we used the results of Lemma 2.2, as well as the delocalization of uk , and denoted
c2k = c2kk the asymptotic cosine of the k-th singular vectors. Moreover
!
r
X
>
>
1/2
>
>
Ez0k (ûk Y0 )(uk ûk ) = Ez0k
`m z0m ûk D0 um + ûk D0 ε0 · (u>
k ûk )
=
m=1
1/2
>
`k Eûk D0 uk
1/2
2
· (u>
k ûk ) → µ`k ck .
Hence, we have the following convergence:
1/2
2
ηk ,o
Ek`k z0k uk − ηk ûk û>
(`k ) = `k + ηk2 · (m + µ2 `k c2k ) − 2ηk · (µ`k c2k )
k Y0 k → E
Pr
Therefore, the limit prediction error is E η,o = k=1 E ηk ,o (`k ), finishing the proof of Thm. 4.3.
49
5.11
Proof of Prop. 4.4
First, clearly the optimal shrinkage for in-sample denoising is smaller, because µ`c2 /(µ2 ` + m) ≤
µ`c2 )/(µ2 `c2 + m). To check that the MSE of in-sample and out-of sample EBLP agree, we verify
that ` − µ(µ`c2 · β)2 /(mt2 ) = ` − µ(µ`c2 )2 /(µ2 `c2 + m). Clearly this holds whenever c2 = 0.
Considering the case c2 > 0, it is enough to show that β 2 /(mt2 ) = 1/(µ2 `c2 + m), or also that
(δ` + γ)2 /(δ`)2 = t2 /(δ`c2 + 1). Since t2 = (δ` + 1)[1 + γ/(δ`)], using the formula for c2 , this follows
immediately, finishing the proof.
5.12
Proofs for denoising in the unreduced-noise model (Sec. 4.4)
The proofs for denoising in the unreduced-noise model from (3) are very similar to those in the
reduced-noise model from (2). Therefore, while we give the full outline of the proofs, we skip some
of the more technical parts that are essentially identical to those in the proof of Thms. 4.1 and 4.3.
5.12.1
BLP
Pr
Pr
1/2
Since Si = k=1 `k zik uk and Di has iid entries with mean µ, we have Cov [Si , Yi ] = µ k=1 `k uk u>
k.
Moreover,
Cov [Yi , Yi ] = EYi Yi> = EDi Si Si> Di + Eεi ε>
i = EDi
r
X
` k uk u>
k Di + Ip .
k=1
Pr
Since the entries
σ 2 , the a, b-th entry of the first component equals k=1 `k uka ukb ·
Pr of Di have variance
EDia Dib = k=1 `k uka ukb [µ2 + σ 2 I(a = b)]. Therefore, denoting diag(uk uk ) the diagonal matrix
with entries {u2ki }, i = 1, . . . , p,
Cov [Yi , Yi ] = µ2
r
X
2
`k uk u>
k + Ip + σ
k=1
r
X
`k diag(uk
uk ).
k=1
Since uk are delocalized, the operator norm of the last term converges to zero, k diag(uk uk )kop ≤
−1
−1
C 2 log2 B(p)/p → 0. Hence by using the matrix
=
Pr inversion difference formula A − B
A−1 (B − A)B −1 , for A = Cov [Yi , Yi ] and B = µ2 k=1 `k uk u>
+
I
,
so
that
kA
−
Bk
→
0,
we
see
p
k
that k Cov [Si , Yi ] A−1 Yi − Cov [Si , Yi ] B −1 Yi k → 0. Thus the BLP is asymptotically equivalent to
2 Pr
−1
Pr
>
µ k=1 `k uk u>
Yi . As in the reduced-noise model in Sec. 5.5, it is not hard
k µ
k=1 `k uk uk + Ip
Pr
2
to show that this is asymptotically equivalent to Ŝiτ = k=1 τk uk u>
k Yi , where τk = µ`k /(µ `k + 1).
τ
To calculate the MSE of Si for general τ in the single-spiked case, we write as in the proof of
Thm 4.1 in Sec. 5.6
EkSi − Ŝiτ k2 = E(`1/2 zi − τ u> Yi )2 = ` + τ 2 E(u> Yi )2 − 2τ `1/2 Ezi u> Yi .
But Yi = Di Si + εi and in the single-spiked case Si = `1/2 zi u, so Ezi u> Yi = E`1/2 zi2 u> Di u +
Ezi u> εi = `1/2 µ. Moreover,
E(u> Yi )2 = E`zi2 (u> Di u)2 + 2`1/2 Ezi u> Di uu> εi + E(u> εi )2 = `E(u> Di u)2 + 1.
Now, denoting by u(k) the entries of u
X
X
X
X
E(u> Di u)2 = E(
u(k)2 Dik )(
u(l)2 Dil ) = µ2
u(k)2 u(l)2 + (µ2 + σ 2 )
u(k)4 .
k
l
k6=l
50
k
P
Since u is delocalized, k u(k)4 → 0, so that E(u> Di u)2 → µ2 . In conclusion, we obtain as required
EkSi − Ŝiτ k2 → ` + τ 2 (`µ2 + 1) − 2τ `µ.
5.12.2
EBLP
To find the MSE of EBLP in the single-spiked case, we have
EkSi − Ŝiη k2 = Ek`1/2 zi u − ηûû> Yi k2 = ` + η 2 E(û> Yi )2 − 2η`1/2 Ezi û> u · û> Yi .
As in Lemma 5.11, we find that E(û> Yi )2 → t2 (µ2 `; γ), where t2 (µ2 `; γ) is defined in Eq. (7). Also,
by the convergence reduction Lemma 5.12, choosing the orientation of û such that û> u ≥ 0, for the
last term it is enough to characterize the limit of Ezi û> Yi .
By the same argument as in Lemma 5.11, we find that Ezi · û> Yi → µ`1/2 ·c(µ2 `; γ)·[1+γ/(µ2 `)].
Hence,
EkSi − Ŝiη k2 → ` + η 2 · t2 (µ2 `; γ) − 2η · µ` · c2 (µ2 `; γ) · [1 + γ/(µ2 `)],
as claimed. This also shows that the optimal coefficient is η ∗ = µ` · c2 (µ2 `; γ)/[µ2 ` + 1].
5.12.3
EBLP Out-of-sample
Finally, for out-of-sample EBLP AMSE in the single-spiked case, we let (Y0 , D0 ) be a new sample,
and expand
Ek`1/2 z0 u − ηûû> Y0 k2 = ` + η 2 E(û> Y0 )2 − 2η`1/2 Ez0 (û> Y0 )(u> û)
Now, because Y0 is independent of û, we can take expectation over the randomess in Y0 to see that
Eû> Y0 · û> Y0 = Eû> [Ip + µ2 `uu> + σ 2 diag(u
2
>
2
2
>
= 1 + µ `E(u û) + σ Eû diag(u
u)]û
u)û → 1 + µ2 `c2 .
On the last line we used that u is delocalized, and the results of Lemma 2.2. Next,
Ez0 (û> Y0 )(u> û) = Ez0 `1/2 z0 û> D0 u + û> ε0 · (u> û)
= `1/2 Eû> D0 u · (u> û) → `1/2 µc2 .
Hence, we have the following convergence to the desired answer: Ek`1/2 z0 u − ηûû> Y0 k2 → ` +
η 2 (1 + µ2 `c2 ) − 2ηµ`c2 . As claimed, the optimal coefficient is η ∗ = µ`c2 /(1 + µ2 `c2 ), while the
optimal MSE is `(1 + µ2 `c2 s2 )/(1 + µ2 `c2 ).
References
J. Andén, E. Katsevich, and A. Singer. Covariance estimation using conjugate gradient for 3D classification
in cryo-EM. In ISBI 2015, pages 200–204, 2015.
T. W. Anderson. An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Wiley New York, 2003.
Z. Bai, B. Miao, and G. Pan. On asymptotics of eigenvectors of large sample covariance matrix. The Annals
of Probability, 35(4):1532–1572, 2007.
Z.-D. Bai and J. W. Silverstein. No eigenvalues outside the support of the limiting spectral distribution of
large-dimensional sample covariance matrices. The Annals of Probability, 26(1):316–345, 1998.
51
Z. Bai and X. Ding. Estimation of spiked eigenvalues in spiked models. Random Matrices: Theory and
Applications, 1(02):1150011, 2012.
Z. Bai and J. W. Silverstein. Spectral analysis of large dimensional random matrices. Springer Series in
Statistics. Springer, 2009.
J. Baik and J. W. Silverstein. Eigenvalues of large sample covariance matrices of spiked population models.
Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 97(6):1382–1408, 2006.
J. Baik, G. Ben Arous, and S. Péché. Phase transition of the largest eigenvalue for nonnull complex sample
covariance matrices. Annals of Probability, 33(5):1643–1697, 2005.
F. Benaych-Georges and R. R. Nadakuditi. The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of finite, low rank perturbations of large random matrices. Advances in Mathematics, 227(1):494–521, 2011.
F. Benaych-Georges and R. R. Nadakuditi. The singular values and vectors of low rank perturbations of
large rectangular random matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 111:120–135, 2012.
T. Bhamre, T. Zhang, and A. Singer. Denoising and covariance estimation of single particle cryo-EM
images. Journal of Structural Biology, 195(1):72–81, 2016.
T. T. Cai and A. Zhang. Minimax rate-optimal estimation of high-dimensional covariance matrices with
incomplete data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 150:55–74, 2016.
E. J. Candès and B. Recht. Exact matrix completion via convex optimization. Foundations of Computational
mathematics, 9(6):717–772, 2009.
M. Capitaine. Additive/multiplicative free subordination property and limiting eigenvectors of spiked
additive deformations of wigner matrices and spiked sample covariance matrices. Journal of Theoretical
Probability, 26(3):595–648, 2013.
C.-I. Chang. Hyperspectral imaging: techniques for spectral detection and classification, volume 1. Springer
Science & Business Media, 2003.
F. Chapon, R. Couillet, W. Hachem, and X. Mestre. The outliers among the singular values of large
rectangular random matrices with additive fixed rank deformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0471,
2012.
R. Couillet and M. Debbah. Random Matrix Methods for Wireless Communications. Cambridge University
Press, 2011.
E. Dobriban. Efficient computation of limit spectra of sample covariance matrices. Random Matrices:
Theory and Applications, 04(04):1550019, 2015.
E. Dobriban and S. Wager. High-dimensional asymptotics of prediction: Ridge regression and classification.
arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.03003, 2015.
D. L. Donoho, M. Gavish, and I. M. Johnstone. Optimal shrinkage of eigenvalues in the spiked covariance
model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.0851, 2013.
L. Erdős and H.-T. Yau. Universality of local spectral statistics of random matrices. Bulletin of the
American Mathematical Society, 49(3):377–414, 2012.
J. E. Fowler. Compressive-projection principal component analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 18(10):2230–2242, 2009.
J. Frank. Chapter 3 - two-dimensional averaging techniques. In J. Frank, editor, Three-Dimensional Electron
Microscopy of Macromolecular Assemblies, pages 54 – 125. Academic Press, Burlington, 1996.
M. Gavish and D. L. Donoho. Optimal shrinkage of singular values. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.7511, 2014.
J. Hartigan. Linear bayesian methods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological),
pages 446–454, 1969.
I. M. Johnstone. On the distribution of the largest eigenvalue in principal components analysis. Annals of
Statistics, 29(2):295–327, 2001.
I. Jolliffe. Principal component analysis. Wiley Online Library, 2002.
K. Jurczak and A. Rohde. Spectral analysis of high-dimensional sample covariance matrices with missing
observations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1507.01615, 2015.
E. Katsevich, A. Katsevich, and A. Singer. Covariance matrix estimation for the cryo-EM heterogeneity
problem. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 8(1):126–185, 2015.
52
S. M. Kay. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Estimation Theory, volume 3. Prentice Hall,
1993.
R. H. Keshevan, S. Oh, and A. Montanari. Matrix completion from a few entries. 2009 IEEE International
Symposium on Information Theory, pages 324–328, 2009.
R. H. Keshevan, S. Oh, and A. Montanari. Matrix completion from noisy entries. Journal of Machine
Learning Research, 11:2057–2078, July 2010.
S. Lee, F. Zou, and F. A. Wright. Convergence and prediction of principal component scores in highdimensional settings. Annals of statistics, 38(6):3605, 2010.
R. J. Little and D. B. Rubin. Statistical analysis with missing data. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.
K. Lounici. High-dimensional covariance matrix estimation with missing observations. Bernoulli, 20(3):
1029–1058, 2014.
D. J. MacKay. Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge university press, 2003.
S. Mallat. A wavelet tour of signal processing: the sparse way. Academic press, 2008.
V. A. Marchenko and L. A. Pastur. Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of random matrices. Mat. Sb.,
114(4):507–536, 1967.
R. R. Nadakuditi. Optshrink: An algorithm for improved low-rank signal matrix denoising by optimal,
data-driven singular value shrinkage. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 60(5):3002–3018, 2014.
D. Paul. Asymptotics of sample eigenstructure for a large dimensional spiked covariance model. Statistica
Sinica, 17(4):1617–1642, 2007.
D. Paul and A. Aue. Random matrix theory in statistics: A review. Journal of Statistical Planning and
Inference, 150:1–29, 2014.
V. Petrov. Sums of independent random variables, volume 82. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
B. Recht. A simpler approach to matrix completion. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12:3413–3430,
December 2011.
J. L. Schafer. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. CRC press, 1997.
S. R. Searle, G. Casella, and C. E. McCulloch. Variance components. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
A. Singer and H.-T. Wu. Two-dimensional tomography from noisy projections taken at unknown random
directions. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 6(1):136–175, 2013.
N. Srivastava and R. Vershynin. Covariance estimation for distributions with 2+epsilon moments. The
Annals of Probability, 41(5):3081–3111, 2013.
T. Tao. Outliers in the spectrum of iid matrices with bounded rank perturbations. Probability Theory and
Related Fields, 155(1-2):231–263, 2013.
J. Yao, Z. Bai, and S. Zheng. Large Sample Covariance Matrices and High-Dimensional Data Analysis.
Cambridge University Press, 2015.
53
| 10math.ST
|
1
Multiplicative Updates for Elastic Net Regularized
Convolutional NMF Under β -Divergence
arXiv:1803.05159v1 [cs.LG] 14 Mar 2018
Pedro J. Villasana T., Stanislaw Gorlow, Member, IEEE and Arvind T. Hariraman
Abstract—We generalize the convolutional NMF by taking the
β-divergence as the loss function, add a regularizer for sparsity
in the form of an elastic net, and provide multiplicative update
rules for its factors in closed form. The new update rules embed
the β-NMF, the standard convolutional NMF, and sparse coding
alias basis pursuit. We demonstrate that the originally published
update rules for the convolutional NMF are suboptimal and that
their convergence rate depends on the size of the kernel.
Index Terms—Convolution, nonnegative matrix factorization,
multiplicative update rules, sparsity, elastic net, β-divergence.
I. I NTRODUCTION
N
ONNEGATIVE matrix factorization finds its application
in the fields of machine learning and in connection with
inverse problems, mostly. It became immensely popular after
Lee and Seung derived multiplicative update rules that made
the up until then additive steps in the direction of the negative
gradient obsolete [1]. In [2], they gave empirical evidence of
their convergence to a stationary point, using (a) the squared
Euclidean distance, and, (b) the generalized Kullback–Leibler
divergence as the contrast function. The factorization’s origins
can be traced back to [3], [4]. To better deal with noisy data,
the notion of a basis is (most commonly) abandoned in favor
of an overcomplete frame or dictionary, and sparsity becomes
a desired property of the coefficient matrix. Early works that
encourage such a factorization by means of L1 -penalty are [5],
[6].
A convolutional variant of the factorization is introduced in
[7] based on the Kullback–Leibler divergence. The main idea
is to exploit temporal dependencies in the neighborhood of a
point in the time-frequency plane. In their original form, the
update rules lead to a biased factorization, because the frame
of each time translation is updated separately but only the last
frame is considered when updating the coefficient matrix. To
provide a remedy, multiple coefficient matrices are computed
in [8], one for each translation frame, and the final update is
by taking the average over the time-aligned matrices.
A nonnegative matrix factor deconvolution in 2D based on
the Kullback–Leibler divergence is found in [9]. Not only do
the authors give a derivation of the update rules, they show a
simple way of making the update rules multiplicative. It may
be pointed out that the update rule for the coefficient matrix
is different from the one in [8]. The same guiding principles
are applied to derive the convolutional factorization based on
P. Villasana is a graduate student at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology,
114 28 Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden and a holder of a scholarship
from the Mexican National Council for Science and Technology CONACYT
e-mail: [email protected].
S. Gorlow is with Dolby Sweden.
A. Hariraman is enrolled at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
the squared Euclidean distance in [10]. But in the attempt to
give a formal proof for their update rules, the authors largely
rederive a biased factorization comparable to [7].
In [11], nonnegative matrix factorization is generalized to a
family of α-divergences under the constraints of sparsity and
smoothness, while the unconstrained β-divergence is brought
into focus in [12]. For both cases multiplicative update rules
are given. In this letter, we derive multiplicative update rules
for the factorial deconvolution under the β-divergence and an
elastic net regularizer. Furthermore, we show that the updates
in [7], [8] are suboptimal and that their convergence rate and
stability depend on the size of the convolution kernel.
II. N ONNEGATIVE M ATRIX FACTORIZATION
The nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) is an umbrella
term for a low-rank matrix approximation of the form
V ' WH
(1)
K×I
with V ∈ RK×N
, W ∈ R>0
, and H ∈ RI×N
>0
>0 , where I is
the predetermined rank of the factorization. The letters above
help distinguish between visible (v) and hidden variables (h)
that are put in relation through weights (w). The factorization
is usually formulated as a convex minimization problem with
a dedicated cost function Cλ according to
minimize Cλ (W, H)
W, H
subject to wki , hin > 0
(2)
with
Cλ (W, H) = L(V, W H) + λ R(H),
(3)
where L is a loss function that assesses the error between V
and the factorization W H, R is a regularization term, and λ
(λ > 0) is a tuning parameter that controls the importance of
R. For λ equal to 0, we obtain a non-regularized NMF.
A. β-Divergence
The loss in (3) can be expressed by means of a contrast or
distance function between the elements of V and W H. Due
to its robustness with respect to outliers for certain values of
the input parameter β, we resort to the β-divergence [13] as a
subclass of the Bregman divergence [14], which for the points
p and q in a closed convex set is given by
Dβ (p, q) =
β
1
p + (β − 1) q β − β p q β−1 ,
β (β − 1)
(4)
including the prominent special cases
DLS (p, q) = Dβ (p, q)|β=2 =
1
2
(p − q) ,
2
(5)
2
for the squared Euclidean distance or the least-squares loss,
p
DKL (p, q) = lim Dβ (p, q) = p log − p + q,
(6)
β→1
q
for the generalized Kullback–Leibler divergence, and
p
p
(7)
DIS (p, q) = lim Dβ (p, q) = − log − 1,
β→0
q
q
for the Itakura–Saito distance. Accordingly, the β-divergence
for matrices V and W H can be defined entrywise, as
X
X
def
Dβ (V, W H) =
Dβ vkn ,
wki hin .
(8)
k,n
i
B. Elastic Net Regularization
The factorization in (1) is an inverse problem, which is ill
posed. As such, it can benefit from a regularization term. We
set in an L1 -regularizer to favor the solution with the fewest
hidden variables, i.e. the lowest model order. More precisely,
the regularizer that imposes sparsity on H is defined as
X
def
R(H) = kHk1 =
hin
with hin > 0,
(9)
i,n
which is simply the sum of the entries in H. To overcome the
limitations of the L1 -penalty, we add a quadratic term, which
is known as elastic net regularization [15]:
III. S PARSE β-CNMF
Ensuing from the preliminary considerations in Section II,
we adopt the formulation of the CNMF from (13) and derive
multiplicative update rules for gradient descent, while taking
the entrywise β-divergence from (8) as the loss function and
imposing sparsity on H as in (10). The result is referred to as
the “sparse β-CNMF”, or β-SCNMF for short.
A. Problem Statement
Under the premise that V is factorizable into {Wm } and
H, m = 0, 1, . . . , M − 1, and given the cost function
X
m
Cλ ({Wm }, H) = Dβ V,
Wm H−→
+λ R(H), (14)
m
we seek to find the multiplicative equivalents of the iterative
update rules for gradient descent:
t
∂
t
t+1
t
C
W
,
H
,
(15a)
Wm
= Wm
−κ
λ
m
t
∂Wm
t
∂
C λ Wm
, Ht ,
(15b)
Ht+1 = Ht − µ
t
∂H
where (15a) and (15b) alternate at each iteration (t > 0). The
step sizes κ and µ are allowed to change at every iteration.
2
def
λ R(H) = λ2 kHkF + λ1 kHk1 ,
(10)
P
2
2
where k·kF = i,n hin is the squared Frobenius norm.
B. Multiplicative Updates Rules
C. Discrete Convolution
As can be seen explicitly in (8), the weight wki for the ith
hidden variable hin at point (k, n) is applied using the scalar
product. Given that hi evolves with n, we can assume that hi
is correlated with its past and future states. We can take this
into account by extending the dot product to a convolution in
our model. Postulating causality and letting the weights have
finite support of cardinality M , the convolution writes
Computing the partial derivatives of Cλ w.r.t. Wm and H,
and by choosing appropriate values for κ and µ, the iterative
update rules from (15) become multiplicative:
h ◦(β−1) T i◦−1
t+1
t
Wm
= Wm
◦ Ut
Ht−→
m
h
i T
◦(β−2)
◦ V ◦ Ut
Ht−→
(16a)
m ,
hX
tT
t◦(β−1)
Ht+1 = Ht ◦
Wm
U←−
+ 2λ2 Ht
m
m
h
i
X
◦−1
tT
t◦(β−2)
m ◦ U m
+ λ1 1I×N ]
◦
Wm
V←−
, (16b)
←−
def
(wki ∗ hi )(n) =
M
−1
X
m
wki (m) hi,n−m .
(11)
m=0
The operation can be converted to a matrix multiplication by
lining up the states hin in a truncated Toeplitz matrix:
hi,1 hi,2 hi,3 · · · hi,N −1
hi,N
0
hi,1 hi,2 · · · hi,N −2
hi,N −1
(12)
..
.
..
..
.
..
..
..
.
.
.
.
.
0
0
0
···
hi,N −M
hi,N −M +1
In accordance with (1), the convolutional NMF (CNMF) can
be formulated as follows to accommodate the structure given
in (12), see also [7], [8]:
V'
M
−1
X
m ,
Wm H−→
(13)
m=0
m
where ·−→
is a columnwise right-shift operation similar to
a logical shift in programming languages that shifts all the
columns of H by m positions to the right, and fills the vacant
positions with zeros. The operation is size-preserving. It can
be seen that the CNMF has M times as many weights as the
regular NMF, whereas the number of hidden states is equal.
for m = 0, 1, . . . , M − 1, with
X
t
Ut =
Wm
Ht−→
m ,
m
where ◦ denotes the Hadamard, i.e. entrywise, product, ·◦p is
equivalent to entrywise exponentiation and ·◦−1 , respectively,
m operator is the leftstands for the entrywise inverse. The ·←−
shift counterpart of the right-shift operator. The details of the
derivation of (16) can be found in the Appendix.
C. Interpretation
The two update rules given in (16) are of significant value
because:
• They are multiplicative, and thus, they converge fast and
are easy to implement.
• Eq. (16a) extends the update rule of the β-NMF for W
to a set of M weight matrices that are linked through a
convolution operation. It also extends the corresponding
update rule of the existing convolutional NMFs with the
squared Euclidean distance or the generalized Kullback–
Leibler divergence to the family of β-divergences.
3
Eq. (16b) is even more important: Apart from providing
a means to control the sparsity of H through λ1 and λ2 ,
it yields a complete update of the hidden states at every
iteration taking all M weight matrices into account.
The update rule in (16b) can be viewed as an equivalent to a
descent in the direction of the Reynolds gradient, which is to
take the average over the partial derivatives under the group
of time translations (in m). Note that this is not the same as
what was originally proposed by Smaragdis [8]. The average
operator reduces the gradient spread as a function of Wm at
each step t and makes the descent converge to a single point
that is most likely.
•
D. Uniqueness and Normalization
It is understood that the factorization is not unique. This is
easily shown by the equivalence
V'
M
−1
X
m
Wm H−→
m=0
≡
M
−1
X
m =
Wm B B−1 H−→
M
−1
X
(17)
fm H
e m
W
−→
m=0
m=0
f m = Wm B and H
e = B−1 H, for any B that has an
with W
I×I
inverse, B ∈ R
in general. Non-negativity still holds for
f m and H
e if B is a nonnegative diagonal matrix, which in
W
this case results in a scaling of the columns of Wm and the
corresponding rows of H. We can use this
to enforce
insight
the same p-norm on the matrices Wi = wkm i ∈ RK×M :
−1
−1
B = diag kW1 k−1
.
(18)
p , kW2 kp , . . . , kWI kp
In Fig. 1 it can be seen that the mean loss is bounded from
below by our updates. Furthermore, one can observe that our
updates converge to a local minimum after the same number
of iterations, whereas the convergence rate of the updates by
Smaragdis depends on the number of time translations M in
the convolution: the greater M , the slower the rate. It can be
added that the average updates produce a steadily decreasing
loss, while the biased updates, where H is updated based on
WM only, can diverge as the iteration continues. For M = 2,
the loss distributions of our and Smaragdis’ average updates
seem to have the same mean but a slightly different standard
deviation. To test the hypothesis that the two populations are
statistically equivalent w.r.t. the mean, we use Welch’s t-test.
The shown p-values indicate that already after the first cycle
of updates the null hypothesis can be rejected almost surely,
i.e. the two update rules converge to different minima. Quite
similar results were obtained for other values of K and N .
V. C ONCLUSION
To the best of our knowledge, with the exception of [9] in
the 2D unconstrained case, our letter is the only to provide a
complete and correct derivation of the multiplicative updates
for the convolutional NMF. In addition, the contrast function
is generalized to the family of β-divergences and a penalty is
added in the form of an elastic net for sparse modeling. It is
shown by simulation that the originally proposed updates for
the convolutional NMF are suboptimal and that convergence
rate of the latter, and stability alike, are subject to the size of
the convolution kernel.
A PPENDIX
Let ukn = i,m wki (m) hi,n−m and U = ukn ∈ RK×N .
Then, for any p ∈ {1, 2, . . . , K}, q ∈ {1, 2, . . . , I}, and r ∈
{0, 1, . . . , M − 1}:
P
e
If all Wm are multiplied by B before (16b), (16b) yields H
immediately. In this way, we can put the significances of the
hidden variables in relation to each other.
IV. S IMULATION
In this section, we compare our update rules with the ones
by Smaragdis in terms of convergence performance. For this,
we generate 100 different V-matrices from M χ2 -distributed
Wm -matrices,
wki (m) =
2
X
∂
Cλ ({Wm }, H)
∂wpq (r)
!
X
uβpn
vpn uβ−1
∂
pn
=
−
n
∂wpq (r)
β
β−1
X
β−1
β−2
=
upn − vpn upn hq,n−r .
n
(21)
Choosing κ from (15a) as
2
wki
(m)
p
∼
χ22
wkip (m) ∼ N (0, 1), (19)
κ= P
p=1
n
and a uniformly distributed H-matrix,
hin ∼ U(0, 1).
wpq (r)
uβ−1
pn hq,n−r
,
(22)
leads to the first update rule
(20)
The Wm -matrices, which represent random spectrograms, are
normalized by the Frobenius norm as per (18). The value for
β is set to 1 (Kullback–Leibler) and the regularization term is
omitted (λ2 = λ1 = 0). The factorizations are simulated with
10 random initializations of {Wm,0 } and H0 (with non-zero
entries). The results shown in Fig. 1 are thus computed over
ensembles of 1000 losses at each iteration. In our simulation,
the number of visible and hidden variables is K = 1000 and
I = 10, and the number of time samples (realizations) is N =
100.
=
t
wki
(m)
β−2
vkn utkn hti,n−m
.
P tβ−1 t
n ukn hi,n−m
P
t+1
wki
(m)
n
(23)
Further, for any p ∈ {1, 2, . . . , I} and q ∈ {1, 2, . . . , N }:
∂
Cλ ({Wm }, H)
∂hpq
!
β−1
uβkn
vkn ukn
∂ X
=
−
k,n
∂hpq
β
β−1
+ λ2
∂
∂
h2 + λ1
hpq .
∂hpq pq
∂hpq
(24)
4
M=2
10 3
10 0
10 -4
10 0
10 1
Mean
Villasana et al.
Smaragdis (biased)
Smaragdis (average)
10 1
10 0
Std
10 1
10 1
10 1
10 0
Villasana et al.
Smaragdis (biased)
Smaragdis (average)
10 -6
10 0
Villasana et al.
Smaragdis (biased)
Smaragdis (average)
10 0
10 -4
10 0
10 2
M = 16
10 -6
10 0
10 2
1
10 2
Villasana et al.
Smaragdis (biased)
Smaragdis (average)
Std
Mean
10 3
10 1
10 2
1
p-value
Villasana et al. vs. Smaragdis (average)
Significance level
p-value
Villasana et al. vs. Smaragdis (average)
Significance level
0.05
0.05
10 0
10 1
Iteration
10 2
10 0
10 1
Iteration
10 2
Fig. 1. Simulation results including the mean and the standard deviation of the loss distribution and the p-value from Welch’s t-test for the hypothesis that
our and Smaragdis’ update rules on average converge to the same minimum as a function of iteration (M is the number of time translations).
It is straightforward to show that
∂
ukn = wkp (n − q)
∂hpq
(25)
by setting n − m = q
m = n − q. As a result, plugging in
q + m for n in (24) and using (25), we finally obtain
∂
Cλ ({Wm }, H)
∂hpq
X
β−2
=
wkp (m) uβ−1
−
v
u
k,q+m
k,q+m
k,q+m
k,m
+ 2λ2 hpq + λ1 .
(26)
Choosing µ from (15b) as
hpq
β−1
k,m wkp (m) uk,q+m
µ= P
+ 2λ2 hpq + λ1
,
leads to the second update rule
P
t
tβ−2
k,m wki (m) vk,n+m uk,n+m
t+1
t
hin = hin P
.
t
tβ−1
t
k,m wki (m) uk,n+m + 2λ2 hin + λ1
(27)
(28)
R EFERENCES
[1] D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative
matrix factorization,” Nature, vol. 401, pp. 788–791, 1999.
[2] ——, “Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization,” in Advances
in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2001, pp. 556–562.
[3] P. Paatero and U. Tapper, “Positive matrix factorization: A non-negative
factor model with optimal utilization of error estimates of data values,”
Environmetrics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–126, 1994.
[4] P. Paatero, “Least squares formulation of robust non-negative factor
analysis,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 37,
no. 1, pp. 23–35, 1997.
[5] P. O. Hoyer, “Non-negative sparse coding,” in Neural Networks for
Signal Processing, 2002, pp. 557–565.
[6] J. Eggert and E. Korner, “Sparse coding and NMF,” in Neural Networks,
vol. 4, 2004, pp. 2529–2533.
[7] P. Smaragdis, “Non-negative matrix factor deconvolution; extraction
of multiple sound sources from monophonic inputs,” in Independent
Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, 2004, pp. 494–499.
[8] ——, “Convolutive speech bases and their application to supervised
speech separation,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language
Processing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2007.
[9] M. N. Schmidt and M. Mørup, “Nonnegative matrix factor 2-D deconvolution for blind single channel source separation,” in Independent
Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, 2006, pp. 700–707.
[10] W. Wang, A. Cichocki, and J. A. Chambers, “A multiplicative algorithm
for convolutive non-negative matrix factorization based on squared
Euclidean distance,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 57,
no. 7, pp. 2858–2864, 2009.
[11] A. Cichocki, R. Zdunek, and S. Amari, “Csiszár’s divergences for nonnegative matrix factorization: Family of new algorithms,” in Independent
Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation, 2006, pp. 32–39.
[12] C. Févotte and J. Idier, “Algorithms for nonnegative matrix factorization
with the β-divergence,” Neural Computation, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2421–
2456, 2011.
[13] A. Basu, I. R. Harris, N. L. Hjort, and M. C. Jones, “Robust and efficient
estimation by minimising a density power divergence,” Biometrika,
vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 549–559, 1998.
[14] L. M. Bregman, “The relaxation method of finding the common point
of convex sets and its application to the solution of problems in convex
programming,” USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical
Physics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 200–217, 1967.
[15] H. Zou and T. Hastie, “Regularization and variable selection via the
elastic net,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67, no. 2, pp.
301–320, 2005.
| 8cs.DS
|
Accepted as a workshop contribution at ICLR 2015
L EARNING C OMPACT C ONVOLUTIONAL
N ETWORKS WITH N ESTED D ROPOUT
N EURAL
arXiv:1412.7155v4 [cs.CV] 10 Apr 2015
Chelsea Finn, Lisa Anne Hendricks & Trevor Darrell
Department of Computer Science
UC Berkeley
Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
{cbfinn, lisa anne, trevor}@eecs.berkeley.edu
A BSTRACT
Recently, nested dropout was proposed as a method for ordering representation
units in autoencoders by their information content, without diminishing reconstruction cost (Rippel et al., 2014). However, it has only been applied to training
fully-connected autoencoders in an unsupervised setting. We explore the impact of
nested dropout on the convolutional layers in a CNN trained by backpropagation,
investigating whether nested dropout can provide a simple and systematic way to
determine the optimal representation size with respect to the desired accuracy and
desired task and data complexity.
1
M OTIVATION
Supervised convolutional neural networks (CNNs) learn representations that are effective on a wide
range of tasks. A drawback of current such approaches, however, is that the selection of such
architectures is largely optimized by hand, with researchers explicitly searching architecture hyperparameters via cross-validation. Model selection for network architectures has been explored in the
context of learning network connectivity dating back to Optimal Brain Damage from LeCun et al.
(1989) and has been continued to be explored in the context of learning optimal sparse models.
To our knowledge there is no deep visual network capable of increasing its representation capacity
based on the complexity of available data or tasks. The recently proposed nested dropout method
implicitly accomplishes this, by learning deep representation units in an incremental fashion. We investigate whether such an approach is applicable to visual CNN models, and propose a visual CNN
model which can learn to scale its capacity according to the complexity of the data presented to the
network during training.
In standard dropout, units in the layer are independently dropped out with probability p, namely the
output of that unit is set to zero. This is traditionally applied to convolutional and fully-connected
layers during training time, and has been shown to act as a regularizer, discouraging over-fitting
to the training data (Hinton et al., 2012), though it has also been applied to entire channels of a
convolutional layer output by Tompson et al. (2014). Empirically, when training large networks,
such as those trained on ImageNet, drop out is necessary to avoid over fitting (Krizhevsky et al.,
2012). Nested dropout, on the other hand, randomly draws unit indices from a geometric distribution
and drops out all of the units that follow the number drawn, e.g. if a number k is drawn, then the
units 0 through k are kept and the remaining units are dropped. When applied to a single layer
semi-linear autoencoder, this technique has been proven to enforce an ordering of the units by their
information capacity, while not decreasing the flexibility of the representation nor the quality of the
resulting solution (Rippel et al., 2014).
The primary contributions of this paper are to (1) demonstrate that nested dropout can successfully
be applied to convolutional layers trained by back-propagation, (2) propose nested dropout as an
advantageous method to learn CNNs that adapt to task and data complexity in a deep learning setting, and (3) provide our implementation in Caffe (Jia et al., 2014), a widely used deep learning
framework, upon publication.
1
Accepted as a workshop contribution at ICLR 2015
2
N ESTED D ROPOUT ON CNN S
The nested dropout algorithm for a convolutional layer with n channels is as follows: for each
sample in a mini-batch, we draw a number k from a geometric distribution and drop out the latter
n − k channels of the output of the layer.
Nested dropout can also be applied to multiple layers in a network by applying nested dropout to
each layer iteratively. First, the number of filters ni for layer i is determined through nested dropout.
After fixing the number of filters ni in layer i, nested dropout can then be used to determine the
number of filters, ni+1 , for layer i + 1.
We trained our CNNs using Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) and mini-batches of 100 samples.
Because dropped out units are determined by drawing from a geometric distribution, units with a low
index are rarely dropped out and thus converge quickly, whereas latter units are frequently dropout
out and thus learned very slowly. Filters are incrementally fixed once they have converged, and only
the remaining filters are considered when drawing numbers from the geometric distribution. Though
incrementing the sweeping index could be done upon filter convergence, we achieved satisfactory
results by simply incrementing the unit sweeping index after a set number of iterations.
To implement this in the Caffe framework, we added a nested dropout layer that can follow any layer
(e.g. convolutional, fully-connected) in the same way as the standard dropout layer. We also added
customizations to the solver to support unit sweeping during training.
3
E XPERIMENTS
Figure 1: Accuracy as a function of the number of filters in conv1, with and without nested dropout.
The oracle consists of 32 separate networks, whereas the nested dropout curve only requires training
a single network. The “brain damaged” baseline is trained without nested dropout and only the k
best filters are used during test. The nested dropout network achieves maximum accuracy with a
compact representation of 23 filters while requiring considerably fewer iterations than a brute force
approach.
We apply nested dropout to the first convolutional layer of a CNN trained to classify images in the
CIFAR-10 dataset, using the default Caffe architecture and training with a fixed learning rate. In
Figure 1, we show the test accuracy of a single network trained with nested dropout as a function
2
Accepted as a workshop contribution at ICLR 2015
of the number of conv1 filters. We report the accuracy with k filters by using the partially-trained
network after the kth filter has converged, and testing it with the last n − k filters dropped out. We
compare to two naive approaches to select the number of filters in conv1. The first approach simply
trains 32 separate networks which differ in the number of conv1 filters. The second approach trains
a single network with 32 filters, but at test time, a varying number of conv1 filters are used with the
remaining dropped out. Note that because there is no inherent ordering to the learned representation
without nested dropout, removing a filter severely damages the network resulting in low accuracies.
Our experiments in Figure 1 demonstrate that nested dropout efficiently determines the relationship
between model capacity and test accuracy. The nested dropout implementation requires 90,000
iterations of training, whereas the brute force approach requires significantly more, up to millions
iterations. For example, training 32 separate networks to completion requires 2,880,000 iterations.
(a)
(b)
Figure 2: conv1 filters of networks trained with nested dropout (a) and without (b). Note that the
latter filters of (a) carry very little information, yet both networks achieve similar performance,
giving an indication for how many units are necessary for this model.
In Figure 2, we visualize the filters learned with and without nested dropout. Though the latter filters
carry very little information, the test accuracy of the two sets of filters are comparable with 0.787
test accuracy for the network trained with nested dropout and 0.786 test accuracy for the baseline
network.
Applying nested dropout to the second convolutional layer yielded similar results to our experiments
with conv1. After training a network with nested dropout applied to conv1 filters, we determined
only 23 conv1 filters are necessary to achieve the maximum classification accuracy for this network.
We next train a network in which nested dropout follows conv2 and with a unit sweeping index
of 5,000. After learning 25 conv2 filters, the training accuracy converges to 78%. Thus, by using
nested dropout we can reduce the total number of parameters in the first two layers by 25% from 64
filters to 48, while maintaining similar accuracy.
4
D ISCUSSION
In summary, we have provided a simple method for determining a more compact representation of
the convolutional layers. In our experiments, we learned a representation that achieved the same
classification accuracy using 23 conv1 filters and 25 conv2 filters rather than the baseline 32 each,
within the same optimization framework. A main advantage of our method is that it enables the
network to gradually increase network capacity during training. Additionally, we hope that, in the
future, ordering parameters may provide insights into optimization of deep convolutional neural
networks and how the network architecture impacts performance.
3
Accepted as a workshop contribution at ICLR 2015
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported in part by DARPA’s MSEE and SMISC programs, NSF awards IIS1427425, IIS-1212798, and IIS-1116411, Toyota, and the Berkeley Vision and Learning Center.
Chelsea Finn was supported by a Berkeley EECS Fellowship and Lisa Anne Hendricks by an NDSEG Fellowship.
R EFERENCES
Hinton, Geoffrey E., Srivastava, Nitish, Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Salakhutdinov,
Ruslan. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. CoRR,
abs/1207.0580, 2012. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0580.
Jia, Yangqing, Shelhamer, Evan, Donahue, Jeff, Karayev, Sergey, Long, Jonathan, Girshick, Ross,
Guadarrama, Sergio, and Darrell, Trevor. Caffe: Convolutional architecture for fast feature embedding. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 675–678.
ACM, 2014.
Krizhevsky, Alex, Sutskever, Ilya, and Hinton, Geoffrey E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pp. 1097–1105,
2012.
LeCun, Yann, Denker, John S, Solla, Sara A, Howard, Richard E, and Jackel, Lawrence D. Optimal
brain damage. In NIPs, volume 2, pp. 598–605, 1989.
Rippel, Oren, Gelbart, Michael A, and Adams, Ryan P. Learning ordered representations with nested
dropout. arXiv preprint arXiv:1402.0915, 2014.
Tompson, Jonathan, Goroshin, Ross, Jain, Arjun, LeCun, Yann, and Bregler, Christoph. Efficient
object localization using convolutional networks. CoRR, abs/1411.4280, 2014. URL http:
//arxiv.org/abs/1411.4280.
4
| 9cs.NE
|
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, SYLVESTER,
BAXTER, AND RELATED MONOIDS
arXiv:1611.04151v2 [math.CO] 5 Mar 2017
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Abstract. This paper considers whether non-trivial identities are satisfied by certain ‘plactic-like’ monoids that, like the plactic monoid, are
closely connected to combinatorics. New results show that the hypoplactic, sylvester, Baxter, stalactic, and taiga monoids satisfy identities, and
indeed give shortest identities satisfied by these monoids. The existing
state of knowledge is discussed for the plactic monoid and left and right
patience sorting monoids.
1. Introduction
The ubiquitous plactic monoid, whose elements can be viewed as semistandard Young tableaux, and which appears in such diverse contexts as symmetric functions [Mac08], representation theory [Ful97], algebraic combinatorics [Lot02], Kostka–Foulkes polynomials [LS81, LS78], Schubert polynomials [LS85, LS90], and musical theory [Jed11], is one of a family of ‘placticlike’ monoids that are closely connected with combinatorics. These monoids
include the hypoplactic monoid [KT97, Nov00], the sylvester monoid [HNT05],
the taiga monoid [Pri13], the stalactic monoid [HNT07, Pri13], the Baxter
monoid [Gir12], and the left and right patience sorting monoids [Rey07,
CMS]. Each of these monoids is obtained by factoring the free monoid
A∗ over the infinite ordered alphabet A = {1 < 2 < 3 < . . .} by a congruence that arises from a so-called insertion algorithm that computes a
combinatorial object from a word. For instance, for the plactic monoid, the
corresponding combinatorial objects are (semistandard) Young tableaux; for
the sylvester monoid, they are binary search trees.
An identity is a formal equality between two words in the free monoid,
and is non-trivial if the two words are distinct. A monoid M satisfies such
an identity if the equality in M holds under every substitution of letters
in the words by elements of M . For example, any commutative monoid
satisfies the non-trivial identity xy = yx. A finitely generated group has
polynomial growth if and only if it is virtually nilpotent [Gro81], and a virtually nilpotent group satisfies a non-trivial identity [Mal53, NT63]. Thus it
is natural to ask whether every finitely generated semigroup or monoid with
polynomial growth satisfies a non-trivial identity. Schneerson [Shn93] provided the first counterexample, but it remains to be seen whether there is a
The first author was supported by an Investigador FCT fellowship
(IF/01622/2013/CP1161/CT0001). For both authors, this work was partially supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portuguese Foundation for Science
and Technology) through the project UID/MAT/00297/2013 (Centro de Matemática e
Aplicações), and the project PTDC/MHC-FIL/2583/2014.
1
Symbol
Plactic
Hypoplactic
Sylvester
#-sylvester
Baxter
Stalactic
Taiga
Left patience sorting
Right patience sorting
plac
hypo
sylv
sylv#
baxt
stal
taig
lPS
rPS
Identity satisfied
?
xyxy = yxyx
xyxy = yxxy
yxyx = yxxy
yxxyxy = yxyxxy
xyx = yxx
xyx = yxx
None
None
Discussed in Original result
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
Subsec.
3.7
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.6
3.6
—
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
Present
[CMS]
[CMS]
paper
paper
paper
paper
paper
paper
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Monoid
2
Table 1. Examples of non-trivial identities satisfied by ‘plactic-like’ monoids. The stated identities are always shortest
non-trivial identities satisfied by the corresponding monoid, but there may be other identities of the same length.
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
3
‘natural’ finitely generated semigroup with polynomial growth that does not
satisfy a non-trivial identity. It is easy to see that the finite-rank analogues
of the plactic monoid and the other related monoids discussed above have
polynomial growth. This naturally leads to the question of whether these
monoids satisfy non-trivial identities, for if any of them failed to do so, it
would certainly be a very natural example of a polynomial-growth monoid
that does not satisfy a non-trivial identity.
Further motivation for this question comes from a result of Jaszuńska
& Okniński, who proved that the Chinese monoid [CEK+ 01], which has
the same growth type as the plactic monoid [DK94] but which does not
arise from such a natural combinatorial object, satisfies Adian’s identity
xyyxxyxyyx = xyyxyxxyyx [JO11, Corollary 3.3.4]. (This is the shortest
non-trivial identity satisfied by the bicyclic monoid [Adi66, Chapter IV,
Theorem 2]).
The goal of this paper is to present new results showing that some of these
monoids satisfy non-trivial identities, and to survey the state of knowledge
for other monoids in this family. New results show that the hypoplactic,
sylvester, baxter, stalactic, and taiga monoids satisfy non-trivial identities.
A discussion of the situation for the left and right patience sorting monoids
and plactic monoids completes the paper. Table 1 summarizes the results.
2. ‘Plactic-like’ monoids
In this section, we recall only the definition and essential facts about the
various monoids; for further background, see [Lot02, Ch. 5] on the plactic monoid, [Nov00] on the hypoplactic monoid, [HNT05] on the sylvester
monoid; [Pri13, § 5] on the taiga monoid; [Pri13] on the stalactic monoid;
[Gir12] on the Baxter monoid; and [CMS] on the patience sorting monoids.
2.1. Alphabets and words. For any alphabet X, the free monoid (that
is, the set of all words, including the empty word) on the alphabet X is
denoted X ∗ . The empty word is denoted ε. For any u ∈ X ∗ , the length
of u is denoted |u|, and, for any x ∈ X, the number of times the symbol x
appears in u is denoted |u|x .
Throughout the paper, A = {1 < 2 < 3 < . . .} is the set of natural
numbers viewed as an infinite ordered alphabet, and An = {1 < 2 < . . . < n}
is set of the first n natural numbers viewed as a finite ordered alphabet.
2.2. Combinatorial objects and insertion algorithms. A Young tableau
is a finite array of symbols from A, with rows non-decreasing from left to
right and columns strictly increasing from top to bottom, with shorter rows
below longer ones, and with rows left-justified. An example of a Young
tableau is
(2.1)
1 1 1 2 5
.
3 3 5 6
6
The following algorithm takes a Young tableau and a symbol from A and
yields a new Young tableau:
4
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Algorithm 2.1 (Schensted’s algorithm). Input: A Young tableau T and a
symbol a ∈ A.
(1) If a is greater than or equal to every entry in the topmost row of T ,
add a as an entry at the rightmost end of T and output the resulting
tableau.
(2) Otherwise, let z be the leftmost entry in the top row of T that is
strictly greater than a. Replace z by a in the topmost row and
recursively insert z into the tableau formed by the rows of T below
the topmost. (Note that the recursion may end with an insertion
into an ‘empty row’ below the existing rows of T .)
A quasi-ribbon tableau is a finite array of symbols from A, with rows
non-decreasing from left to right and columns strictly increasing from top
to bottom, that does not contain any 2 × 2 subarray (that is, of the form
). An example of a quasi-ribbon tableau is:
(2.2)
1 1 1 2
3 3 5 5
.
6 6
Notice that the same symbol cannot appear in two different rows of a quasiribbon tableau. There is also an insertion algorithm for quasi-ribon tableau:
Algorithm 2.2 ([Nov00, Algorithm 4.4]). Input: A quasi-ribbon tableau T
and a symbol a ∈ A.
If there is no entry in T that is less than or equal to a, output the tableau
obtained by putting a and gluing T by its top-leftmost entry to the bottom
of a.
Otherwise, let x be the right-most and bottom-most entry of T that is
less than or equal to a. Put a new entry a to the right of x and glue the
remaining part of T (below and to the right of x) onto the bottom of the
new entry a. Output the new tableau.
A right strict binary search tree is a labelled rooted binary tree where
the label of each node is greater than or equal to the label of every node in
its left subtree, and strictly less than every node in its right subtree. An
example of a binary search tree is
5
2
(2.3)
1
1
1
6
5
.
6
3
3
The insertion algorithm for right strict binary search trees adds the new
symbol as a leaf node in the unique place that maintains the property of
being a right strict binary search tree:
Algorithm 2.3 ([HNT05, § 3.3]). Input: A right strict binary search tree
T and a symbol a ∈ A.
If T is empty, create a node and label it a. If T is non-empty, examine the
label x of the root node; if a ≥ x, recursively insert a into the right subtree
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
5
of the root node; otherwise recursively insert a into the left subtree of the
root note. Output the resulting tree.
A left strict binary search tree is a labelled rooted binary tree where the
label of each node is strictly greater than the label of every node in its left
subtree, and less than or equal to every node in its right subtree; see the left
tree shown in (2.4) below for an example.
The insertion algorithm for left strict binary search trees is dual to Algorithm 2.3
above:
Algorithm 2.4. Input: A left strict binary search tree T and a symbol
a ∈ A.
If T is empty, create a node and label it a. If T is non-empty, examine the
label x of the root node; if a ≤ x, recursively insert a into the left subtree
of the root node; otherwise recursively insert a into the right subtree of the
root note. Output the resulting tree.
The canopy of a (labelled or unlabelled) binary tree T is the word over
{0, 1} obtained by traversing the empty subtrees of the nodes of T from left
to right, except the first and the last, labelling an empty left subtree by 1
and an empty right subtree by 0. (See (2.4) below for examples of canopies.)
A pair of twin binary search trees consist of a left strict binary search tree
TL and a right strict binary search tree TR , such that TL and TR contain
the same symbols, and the canopies of TL and TR are complementary, in the
sense that the i-th symbol of the canopy of TL is 0 (respectively 1) if and only
if the i-th symbol of the canopy of TR is 1 (respectively 0). The following
is an example of a pair of twin binary search trees, with the complementary
canopies 0110101 and 1001010 shown in grey:
3
(2.4)
5
1
6
3
6
11
1
1
1
5
1
1
2
5
1 0
1 0
2
1
,
5
0
1
3
0
1
0
3
0
1 0
6
0
1 0
6
.
A stalactic tableau is a finite array of symbols of A in which columns are
top-aligned, and two symbols appear in the same column if and only if they
are equal. For example,
(2.5)
3 1 2 6 5
3 1
6 5
1
is a stalactic tableau. The insertion algorithm is very straightforward:
Algorithm 2.5 ([HNT07, § 3.7]). Input: A stalactic tableau T and a symbol
a ∈ A.
6
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
If a does not appear in T , add a to the left of the top row of T . If a does
appear in T , add a to the bottom of the (by definition, unique) column in
which a appears. Output the new tableau.
A binary search tree with multiplicities is a labelled binary search tree in
which each label appears at most once, and where a non-negative integer
called the multiplicity is assigned to each node label. An example of a binary
search tree is:
52
(2.6)
1
62
2
13
.
32
(The superscripts on the labels in each node denote the multiplicities.)
Algorithm 2.6. ([Pri13, Algorithm 3]) Input: A binary search tree with
multiplicities T and a symbol a ∈ A.
If T is empty, create a node, label it by a, and assign it multiplicity 1. If
T is non-empty, examine the label x of the root node; if a < x, recursively
insert a into the left subtree of the root node; if a > x, recursively insert
a into the right subtree of the root note; if a = x, increment by 1 the
multiplicity of the node label x.
An lPS tableau is a finite array of symbols of A in which columns are
top-aligned, the entries in the top row are non-decreasing from left to right,
and the entries in each column are strictly increasing from top to bottom.
For example,
(2.7)
1 1 1 2 5
3 3 5
6
6
is an lPS tableau. The insertion algorithm is very straightforward:
Algorithm 2.7 ([TY11, § 3.2]). Input: An lPS tableau T and a symbol
a ∈ A.
If a is greater than or equal to every symbol that appears in the top row
of T , add a to the right of the top row of T . Otherwise, let C be the leftmost
column whose topmost symbol is strictly greater than a. Slide column C
down by one space and add a as a new entry on top of C. Output the new
tableau.
An rPS tableau is a finite array of symbols of A in which columns are topaligned, the entries in the top row are increasing from left to right, and the
entries in each column are non-decreasing from top to bottom. For example,
(2.8)
1 2 5 6
1 3 5
1 6
3
is an rPS tableau. Again, the insertion algorithm is very straightforward:
Algorithm 2.8 ([TY11, § 3.2]). Input: An rPS tableau T and a symbol
a ∈ A.
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
7
If a is greater than every symbol that appears in the top row of T , add a
to the right of the top row of T . Otherwise, let C be the leftmost column
whose topmost symbol is greater than or equal to a. Slide column C down
by one space and add a as a new entry on top of C. Output the new tableau.
2.3. Monoids from insertion. Let M ∈ {plac, hypo, sylv, sylv# , baxt, stal,
taig, lPS, rPS} and u ∈ A∗ . Using the insertion algorithms described above,
one can compute from u a combinatorial object PM (u) of the type associated to M in Table 2. If M 6= baxt, one computes PM (u) by starting with
the empty combinatorial object and inserting the symbols of u one-by-one
using the appropriate insertion algorithm and proceeding through the word
u either left-to-right or right-to-left as shown in the table. For M = baxt,
one uses a slightly different procedure:
Pbaxt (u) is the pair of twin binary
search trees Psylv# (u), Psylv (u) .
For each M ∈ {plac, hypo, sylv, sylv# , baxt, stal, taig, lPS, rPS}, define the
relation ≡M by
u ≡M v ⇐⇒ PM (u) = PM (v).
In each case, the relation ≡M is a congruence on A∗ , and so the factor
monoid M = A∗/≡M can be formed, and is named as in Table 2. The rankn analogue is the factor monoid Mn = A∗n /≡M , where the relation ≡M is
naturally restricted to A∗n × A∗n .
It follows from the definition of ≡M (for any M ∈ {plac, hypo, sylv, sylv# ,
baxt, stal, taig, lPS, rPS}) that each element [u]≡M of the factor monoid M can
be identified with the combinatorial object PM (u).
The evaluation (also called the content) of a word u ∈ A∗ , denoted ev(u),
is the infinite tuple of non-negative integers, indexed by A, whose a-th element is |u|a ; thus this tuple describes the number of each symbol in A
that appears in u. It is immediate from the definition of the monoids above
that if u ≡M v, then ev(u) = ev(v), and hence it makes sense to define the
evaluation of an element p of one of these monoids to be the evaluation of
any word representing it.
Note that Mn is a submonoid of M for all n, and that Mm is a submonoid
of Mn for all m ≤ n. In each case, M1 is a free monogenic monoid and thus
commutative, but that Mn is non-commutative for n ≥ 2 (and thus M is
also non-commutative).
3. Identities
Subsections 3.2 to 3.5 find shortest non-trivial identities satisfied by hypo,
stal, taig, sylv, sylv# , and baxt, in that order. Subsection 3.6 discusses the
situation for lPS and rPS, and Subsection 3.7 discusses the current state of
knowledge for plac.
3.1. Preliminaries. An identity over an alphabet X is a formal equality
u = v, where u and v are words in the free monoid X ∗ , and is non-trivial if
u and v are not equal. The elements of X are called variables. A monoid
M satisfies the identity u = v if, for every homomorphism φ : X ∗ → M , the
equality φ(u) = φ(v) holds in M . It is often useful to think of this in the
informal way mentioned in the introduction: M satisfies the identity u = v
if equality in M holds under every substitution of variables in the words u
Symbol
Combinatorial object
Algorithm Direction
Example
Plactic
Hypoplactic
Sylvester
#-sylvester
Baxter
Stalactic
Taiga
Left patience sorting
Right patience sorting
plac
hypo
sylv
sylv#
baxt
stal
taig
lPS
rPS
Young tableau
Quasi-ribbon tableau
Right strict binary search tree
Left strict binary search tree
Pair of twin BSTs
Stalactic tableau
BST with multiplicities
lPS tableau
rPS tableau
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
—
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
Pplac (3613151265) is (2.1)
Phypo (3613151265) is (2.2)
Psylv (3613151265) is (2.3)
Psylv (3613151265) is (2.3)
Pbaxt (3613151265) is (2.4)
Pstal (3613151265) is (2.5)
Ptaig (3613151265) is (2.6)
PlPS (3613151265) is (2.7)
PrPS (3613151265) is (2.8)
L-to-R
L-to-R
R-to-L
L-to-R
—
R-to-L
R-to-L
L-to-R
L-to-R
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Monoid
8
Table 2. Insertion algorithms used to compute combinatorial objects, and the corresponding monoids. ‘L-to-R’ and
‘R-to-L’ abbreviate ‘left-to-right’ and ‘right-to-left’, respectively. The algorithm used to compute Pbaxt (·) is a special
case and is discussed in the main text.
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
9
and v by elements of M . Note that if a monoid satisfies an identity u = v,
all of its submonoids and all of its homomorphic images satisfy u = v.
Lemma 3.1. Let M be a monoid satisfying a non-trivial identity. Then the
shortest (in terms of the sums of the lengths of the two sides) non-trivial
identity satisfied by M is an identity over an alphabet with at most two
variables.
Proof. It is sufficient to show that, for any non-trivial identity over an alphabet with at most three variables, there is a strictly shorter identity with
at most two variables. So suppose that u = v is a non-trivial identity over X
satisfied by M , where |X| ≥ 3. Interchanging u and v if necessary, assume
|u| ≤ |v|. Let eM be the identity (that is, the multiplicative neutral element)
of M .
First consider the case where u is a prefix of v. By non-triviality, u
is strictly shorter than v, so that v = uw for some non-empty word w.
Let x ∈ X be a variable that appears in w. So x|u|x = x|v|x is a nontrivial identity. To see that it is satisfied by M , proceed as follows: Let φ′ :
{x}∗ → M be a homomorphism. Extend φ′ to a homomorphism φ : X → M
by defining φ(z) = eM for all z ∈ X \ {x}. Note that φ′ (x|u|x ) = φ(u) and
φ′ (x|v|x ) = φ(v) by the definition of φ′ , and that φ′ (u) = φ′ (v) since M
satisfies u = v. Combining these equaltities shows that φ(x|u|x ) = φ(x|v|x ).
Hence M satisfies the non-trivial identity x|u|x = x|v|x over the alphabet
{x}.
Now suppose u is not a prefix of v. Suppose u = u1 · · · u|u| and v =
v1 · · · v|v| . Let i be minimal such that the variables ui and vi are different;
suppose these variables are x and y. Let u′ and v ′ be obtained from u and
v respectively by deleting all variables other than x and y. By the choice of
i, u′ = v ′ is a non-trivial identity. To see that it is satisfied by M , proceed
as follows: Let φ′ : {x, y}∗ → M be a homomorphism. Extend φ′ to a
homomorphism φ : X ∗ → M by defining φ(z) = eM for all z ∈ X \ {x, y}.
Note that φ(u) = φ′ (u′ ) and φ(v) = φ′ (v ′ ) by the definitions of the words u′
and v ′ and the homomorphism φ; note also that φ(u) = φ(v) since M satisfies
the identity u = v. Combining these equalities shows that φ′ (u′ ) = φ′ (v ′ ).
So M satisfies the non-trivial identity u′ = v ′ over the alphabet {x, y}.
Note that in both cases the resulting identity is strictly shorter than the
original one.
Lemma 3.2. Let M be a monoid that contains a free monogenic submonoid
and suppose that M satisfies an identity u = v over an alphabet X. Then
|u| = |v| and |u|x = |v|x for all x ∈ X. Consequently, if u = v is non-trivial,
then |X| ≥ 2.
Proof. Let a ∈ M generate a free monogenic submonoid of M and let eM
be the identity of M . Let x ∈ X. Define
φx : X ∗ → M,
x 7→ a,
z 7→ eM for all z ∈ X \ {x}.
Then a|u|x = φx (u) = φx (v) = a|v|x since M satisfies u = v. Since a
generates a free monogenic submonoid, |u|x = |v|x . Since this holds for all
x ∈ X, it follows that |u| = |v|.
10
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
The length of an identity u = v with |u| = |v| is defined to be |u| = |v|;
note that this applies to any identity satisfied by a monoid that contains a
free monogenic submonoid by Lemma 3.2.
Two identities u = v and u′ = v ′ are equivalent if one can be obtained
from the other by possibly renaming variables and swapping the two sides of
the equality. For example, xyxy = yxxy and xyyx = yxyx are equivalent,
since the second can be obtained from the first by interchanging the variables
x and y and swapping the two sides.
Lemma 3.3.
(1) Up to equivalence, the only length-2 non-trivial identity that can be satisfied by a monoid that contains a free monogenic
submonoid is xy = yx; thus any homogeneous monoid satisfying a
length-2 identity is commutative.
(2) Up to equivalence, the only length-3 non-trivial identities over a twoletter alphabet that can be satisfied by a monoid that contains a free
monogenic submonoid are
xxy = xyx,
xxy = yxx,
xyx = yxx.
(1) Let u1 u2 = v1 v2 be a non-trivial identity satisfied by some
monoid that contains a free monogenic submonoid. Suppose u1 and
v1 are the same variable. Then Lemma 3.2, implies that u2 and v2
are also the same variable, contradicting non-triviality. Thus u1 and
v1 are different variables. Then Lemma 3.2, implies that u2 is the
same variable as v1 and v2 is the same variable as u1 . Thus, up to
equivalence, the identity is xy = yx.
(2) Let u1 u2 u3 = v1 v2 v3 (where ui , vi ∈ {x, y}) be a non-trivial identity
satisfied by some homogeneous monoid. Let I be the set of indices
i ∈ {1, 2, 3} where the variables ui and vi are the same. Clearly,
non-triviality shows that |I| < 3. If |I| = 2, then, interchanging x
and y if necessary, there is a unique i ∈ {1, 2, 3} where ui is x and
vi is y. Then |u|x = 1 + |v|x , since the words u and v differ only at
the i-th symbol; this contradicts Lemma 3.2. If |I| = 0, then every
symbol of u differs from every symbol of v. Since |u| = 3, at least
one of |u|x and |u|y is at least 2. Interchanging x and y if necessary,
assume |u|x ≥ 2. Then |v|x = |u|y ≤ 1, which is a contadiction.
The only remaining possibility is |I| = 1. Interchanging x and y if
necessary, assume that ui and vi are both x for exactly one i ∈ 1, 2, 3.
For each of the three possibilities, the conditions |u|x = |v|x and
|u|y = |v|y require the other symbols in u must be x and y, with
the corresponding symbols in v being the opposite. Each possibility
gives one of the given identities.
Proof.
Let M ∈ {plac, hypo, sylv, taig, stal, baxt, lPS, rPS}. Then M contains the
free monogenic submonoid M1 . (Note that M1 thus satisfies the non-trivial
identity xy = yx.) By Lemma 3.2, if M satisfies a non-trivial identity, it
must be over an alphabet with at least two variables. The aim is to find
shortest non-trivial identities satisfies by each monoid M: Lemmata 3.1 and
3.2 show that it will suffice to consider identities u = v over {x, y} with
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
11
|u| = |v|. Note that since none of the monoids M is commutative, any
identity must have length at least 3.
3.2. Hypoplactic monoid. The authors proved the following result using
a quasi-crystal structure for the hypoplactic monoid [CM17, Theorem 9.3];
this subsection presents a direct proof.
Proposition 3.4. The hypoplactic monoid satisfies the following non-trivial
identities
xyxy = xyyx = yxxy = yxyx;
xxyx = xyxx.
Furthermore, up to equivalence, these are the shortest non-trivial identities
satisfied by the hypoplactic monoid.
Proof. The first goal is to show that these identities are satisfied by hypo.
Let s, t ∈ hypo, and let p, q ∈ A∗ be words representing s, t, respectively.
Let B = {a1 < . . . < ak } be the set of symbols in A that appear in at least
one of p and q.
By Algorithm 2.2, symbols ai+1 and ai are on the same row of Phypo (w)
(for any w ∈ B ∗ ) if and only if the word w does not contain a symbol
ai somewhere to the right of a symbol ai+1 (since inserting this symbol ai
results in the part of the quasi-ribbon tableau that contains ai+1 being glued
below the entry ai ).
Suppose pqpq contains a symbol ai somewhere to the right of a symbol
ai+1 . Then, regardless of whether these symbols both lie in u, both lie in
v, or one lies in u and the other lies in v, the word pqqp also contains a
symbol ai to the right of a symbol ai+1 . Similar reasoning establishes that
if any of the words pqpq, qppq, qpqp, pqqp, ppqp, or pqpp, contains a symbol
ai somewhere to the right of a symbol ai+1 , so do all the others. Hence
either the symbols ai and ai+1 are on the same row in all of Phypo (pqpq),
Phypo (pqqp), Phypo (qppq), Phypo (qpqp), Phypo (ppqp), and Phypo (pqpp), or on
different rows in all of them.
A quasi-ribbon tableau is clearly determined by its evaluation and by
knowledge of whether adjacent different entries are on the same row. Thus,
noting that ev(pqpq) = ev(qppq) = ev(qpqp) = ev(pqqp), it follows from the
previous paragraph that
stst = Phypo (pqpq) = tsst = Phypo (qppq)
= tsts = Phypo (qpqp) = stts = Phypo (pqqp).
Similarly, noting that ev(ppqp) = ev(pqpp), it follows that
ssts = Phypo (ppqp) = Phypo (pqpp) = stss.
The next goal is to show that, up to equivalence, these are the only
length-4 non-trivial identities satisfied by hypo. Let u = v be a length-4
non-trivial identity over {x, y} satisfied by hypo. By Lemma 3.2, |u|x = |v|x
and |u|y = |v|y .
By Algorithm 2.2, symbols 1 and 2 are on different rows of Phypo (w) (for
any w ∈ {1, 2}∗ ) if and only if the word w contain a symbol 1 somewhere to
the right of a symbol 2. Suppose u contains a factor xy. Let φ : {x, y}∗ →
12
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
hypo map x to 2 and y to 1; then Phypo (φ(u)) has 1 and 2 on different rows.
The same must hold for Phypo (φ(v)), and thus v must contain a factor xy.
The converse is similar, and the reasoning is parallel for factors yx. Thus u
contains a factor xy (respectively, yx) if and only if v contains a factor xy
(respectively, yx).
If both u and v contain only factors xy, then u = x|u|x y |u|y = x|v|x y |v|y =
v, which contradicts non-triviality. Similarly, it is impossible for u and v to
contain only factors yx. So both u and v contain factors xy and yx.
Interchanging x and y if necessary, assume |u|x = |v|x ≥ |u|y = |v|y .
First consider the case where |u|x = |v|x = 3 and |u|y = |v|y = 1. Since u
and v both contain xy and yx, this implies that u, v ∈ {xxyx, xyxx}. Now
consider the case |u|x = |v|x = 2 and |u|y = |v|y = 2. Again, since u and v
both contain xy and yx, this implies that u, v ∈ {xyxy, xyyx, yxxy, yxyx}.
Thus u = v is equivalent to one of the identities in the statement.
The final goal is to prove that no length-3 non-trivial identity is satisfied
by hypo. Consider the length-3 identities from Lemma 3.3(2):
xxy = xyx,
xxy = yxx,
xyx = yxx.
If one puts x = 1 and y = 2 into the first two identities and x = 2 and y = 1
in the second, one sees that hypo satisfies none of them:
Phypo (112) = 1 1 2 6=
1 1
= Phypo (121);
2
Phypo (112) = 1 1 2 6=
1 1
= Phypo (211);
2
Phypo (212) =
1
6= 1 2 2 = Phypo (122).
2 2
Thus hypo satisfies no length-3 identity.
3.3. Stalactic and taiga monoids.
Lemma 3.5. The stalactic monoid satisfies the non-trivial identity xyx =
yxx.
Proof. Let x, y ∈ stal and let u, v ∈ A∗ be words representing x, y, respectively. Since the tree Pstal (w) is computed by applying Algorithm 2.5 to each
symbol in the word w ∈ A∗ , proceeding right to left, it is clear that the order
of the rightmost appearances of each symbol in w determines order of symbols in the top row of the stalactic tableau Pstal (w). Since the order of rightmost appearances of each symbol in the words uvu and vuu are the same, the
order of symbols in the top row of Pstal (uvu) and Pstal (vuu) is also the same.
Since ev(uvu) = ev(vuu), the length of corresponding columns in Pstal (uvu)
and Pstal (vuu) are equal. Hence xyx = Pstal (uvu) = Pstal (vuu) = yxx.
Lemma 3.6. The taiga monoid does not satisfy either of the identities
xxy = xyx or xxy = yxx, and does not satisfy a non-trivial identity of
length 2.
Proof. To see that taig does not satisfy either of the identities xxy = xyx or
xxy = yxx, note that the rightmost symbol of w ∈ A∗ labels the root node
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
13
of Ptaig (w), but the rightmost symbols of both these identities are different.
Thus substituting 1 for x and 2 for y shows that neither identity can be
satisfied by taig.
Finally, taig does not satisfy a non-trivial identity of length 2 since it is
clearly non-commutative.
Since the taiga monoid is a homomorphic image of the stalactic monoid
[Pri13, § 5], any identity that is satisfied by stal is satisfied by taig. Combining this with Lemmata 3.3, 3.5, and 3.6 gives the following results:
Proposition 3.7. The stalactic monoid satisfies the non-trivial identity
xyx = yxx. Furthermore, this is the unique shortest non-trivial identity
satisfied by the stalactic monoid.
Proposition 3.8. The taiga monoid satisfies the non-trivial identity xyx =
yxx. Furthermore, this is the unique shortest non-trivial identity satisfied
by the taiga monoid.
3.4. Sylvester monoid. By the definition of a binary search tree, if a tree
has a node with label a, then any other node with label a is either above
it or in its left subtree. This shows that there is a unique path from the
root to a leaf node that contains all nodes labelled a. In particular, there is
at most one leaf node with label a. Furthermore, there is a unique node a
that is both the leftmost node with label a and the node labelled a that is
furthest from the root. Similarly, there is a unique node a that is both the
rightmost node with label a and the node labelled a that is closest to the
root.
Lemma 3.9. The sylvester monoid is left-cancellative.
Proof. Let u, v ∈ A∗ and a ∈ A. Suppose that Psylv (au) = Psylv (av). That
is, the binary search trees Psylv (au) and Psylv (av) are equal. Note further
that the last symbol a inserted into both binary search trees is a leaf node.
Deleting this (unique) leaf node labelled a from the equal trees Psylv (au) and
Psylv (av) leaves equal binary search trees. That is, Psylv (u) and Psylv (v) are
equal.
Since u and v are arbitrary words and a represents an arbitrary generator,
it follows that sylv is left-cancellative.
Lemma 3.10. The sylvester monoid does not satisfy an identity equivalent
to one of the form uxx = vyx, for any u, v ∈ {x, y}∗ .
Proof. Using the Algorithm 2.3, one sees that
2
Psylv (· · · 22) =
2
2
and Psylv (· · · 12) =
1
;
note that these binary search trees differ in the left child of the root node.
Thus to see that the identity uxx = vyx cannot be satisfied by sylv, one can
substitute 2 for x and 1 for y.
Lemma 3.11. Let p, q, r ∈ sylv be such that ev(p) = ev(q) = ev(r). Then
pr = qr.
14
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Proof. Let u, v, w ∈ A∗ be words representing p, q, r, respectively. The tree
Psylv (x) is computed by applying Algorithm 2.3 to each symbol in x, proceeding right to left. That is, Psylv (uw) and Psylv (vw) are obtained by inserting
u and v (respectively) into Psylv (w). Since ev(u) = ev(v) = ev(w), every
symbol that appears in u or v also appears in w and thus in Psylv (w).
Consider how further symbols from u or v are inserted into Psylv (w):
• Let a be the smallest symbol that appears in u, v, and w. Then the
leftmost node of Psylv (w) must be labelled by a. Thus, during the
computation of Psylv (uw) and Psylv (vw), all symbols a in u and v
will certainly be inserted into the left subtree of this leftmost node
in Psylv (w), and no other symbols are inserted into this left subtree
by the minimality of a.
• Let c be some symbol other than a that appears in u, v, and w, and
let b be the maximum symbol less than c appearing in u, v, and w.
Let Nc be the leftmost node in Psylv (w) labelled by c and let Nb be
the rightmost node in Psylv (w) labelled by b.
Suppose v is the label of the lowest common ancestor Nv of the
nodes Nb and Nc . If Nv is neither Nb not Nc , then b ≤ v < c, which
implies v = b by the choice of b, which contradicts the fact that Nb
is the rightmost node labelled b. Thus the lowest common ancestor
of Nb and Nc must be one of Nb or Nc . That is, one of the following
must hold:
– Nb is above Nc . Then Nc is in the right subtree of Nb , since
b < c. Since there is no node that is to the right of Nb and
to the left of Nc , it follows that Nc has an empty left subtree.
Thus any symbol c in u or v will be inserted into this currently
empty left subtree of Nc , and no other symbols will be inserted
into this subtree by the maximality of b among the symbols less
than c.
– Nc is above Nb . Then Nb is in the left subtree of Nc , since
b < c. Since there is no node that is to the right of Nb and to
the left of Nc , it follows that Nb is the left child of Nc , and that
Nb has an empty right subtree. Thus any symbol c in u or v
will be inserted into this currently empty right subtree of Nb ,
and no other symbols will be inserted into this subtree by the
maximality of b among the symbols less than c.
Combining these cases, one sees that every symbol d from u or v is inserted
into a particular previously empty subtree of Psylv (w), dependent only on
the value of the symbol d (and not on its position in u or v), and that
unequal symbols are inserted into different subtrees. Since ev(u) = ev(v),
the same number of symbols d are inserted, for each such symbol d. Hence
Psylv (uw) = Psylv (vw) and thus pr = Pstal (uw) = Pstal (vw) = qr.
Proposition 3.12. The sylvester monoid satisfies the non-trivial identity
xyxy = yxxy. Furthermore, up to equivalence, this is the unique shortest
identity satisfied by the sylvester monoid.
Proof. Let x, y ∈ sylv. Let p = r = xy and q = yx. Then ev(p) = ev(q) =
ev(r), so pr = qr by Lemma 3.11. Thus sylv satisfies xyxy = yxxy.
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
15
Since hypo is a homomorphic image of sylv [Pri13, Example 6], and hypo
satisfies no length-3 identity by Proposition 3.4, it follows that sylv cannot
satisfy a length-3 identity.
So let u = v be some length-4 identity satisfied by sylv. Suppose u =
u1 u2 u3 u4 and v = v1 v2 v3 v4 , where ui , vi ∈ {x, y}. Since the rightmost
symbol in a word w determines the root node of Psylv (w), it follows that
u4 and v4 are the same symbol; interchanging x and y if necessary, assume
this is y. If u1 and v1 were the same symbol, then the left-cancellativity
of sylv (Lemma 3.9) would imply that sylv satisfied the length-3 identity
u2 u3 u4 = v2 v3 v4 , which contradicts the previous paragraph. Thus u1 and
v1 are different symbols. Interchanging u and v if necessary, assume that u1
is x and v1 is y. The condition |u|y = |v|y implies that at least one of u2
and u3 is y, which yields the following three possibilities for u:
xyyy,
xxyy,
xyxy.
The conditions |u|x = |v|x and |u|y = |v|y now imply the following four
possibilities for the identity u = v (with the first possibility for u above
giving two different identities):
xyyy = yxyy,
xyyy = yyxy,
xxyy = yxxy,
xyxy = yxxy.
The last of these is the identity already proven to hold in sylv. The second
and third cannot hold in sylv by Lemma 3.10. In the first identity, putting
x = 1 and y = 2 proves that it is not satisfied by sylv:
2
Psylv (1222) =
2
2
1
2
6=
2
= Psylv (2122)
1
2
Thus xyxy = yxxy is the unique shortest identity satisfied by sylv.
Since the sylvester and #-sylvester monoids are anti-isomorphic, the following results follow by dual reasoning:
Lemma 3.13. The #-sylvester monoid is right-cancellative.
Lemma 3.14. The #-sylvester monoid does not satisfy an identity equivalent to one of the form xxu = xyv, for any u, v ∈ {x, y}∗ .
Lemma 3.15. Let p, q, s ∈ sylv# be such that ev(p) = ev(q) = ev(s). Then
sp = sq.
Proposition 3.16. The #-sylvester monoid satisfies the non-trivial identity
yxyx = yxxy. Furthermore, up to equivalence, this is the unique shortest
identity satisfied by the #-sylvester monoid.
3.5. Baxter monoid.
Lemma 3.17. Let p, q, r, s ∈ baxt be such that ev(p) = ev(q) = ev(r) =
ev(s). Then spr = sqr.
Proof. Let t, u, v, w ∈ A∗ represent p, q, r, s, respectively.
Let t′ = wt and u′ = wu; note that ev(t′ ) = ev(u′ ). By Lemma 3.11
applied to the elements Psylv (t′ ), Psylv (u′ ), Psylv (v), it follows that Psylv (t′ v) =
Psylv (u′ v); thus Psylv (wtv) = Psylv (wuv)
16
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
Let t′′ = tv and u′′ = uv; note that ev(t′′ ) = ev(u′′ ). By Lemma 3.15 applied to the elements Psylv# (t′ ), Psylv# (u′ ), Psylv# (w), it follows that Psylv# (wt′′ ) =
Psylv# (wu′′ ); thus Psylv# (wtv) = Psylv# (wuv).
Hence
spr = Pbaxt (wuv) = Psylv# (wtv), Psylv (wtv)
= Psylv# (wuv), Psylv (wuv) = Pbaxt (wuv) = sqp.
Proposition 3.18. The Baxter monoid satisfies the identities
yxxyxy = yxyxxy and xyxyxy = xyyxxy.
Furthermore, up to equivalence, these are the unique shortest non-trivial
identities satisfied by the Baxter monoid.
Proof. Let x, y ∈ baxt. Let p = r = xy and q = s = yx. Then ev(p) =
ev(q) = ev(r) = ev(s). Thus, by Lemma 3.17, yxxyxy = spr = sqr =
yxyxxy. The same reasoning with s = xy shows that xyxyxy = xyyxxy.
The next step is to show that, up to equivalence, these are the only
identities of length 6 satisfied by baxt. So suppose that u = v is an identity
of length 6 satisfied by baxt, with u = u1 u2 · · · u6 and v = v1 v2 · · · v6 , where
ui , vi ∈ {x, y}. Since the first symbol in a word w determines the root
symbol of the left-hand tree in the pair Pbaxt (u), and since the last symbol
determines the root symbol of the right-hand tree, it follows that u1 and v1
must be the same variable, and that u6 and v6 must the same variable. By
Lemmata 3.10 and 3.14, u2 and v2 must be the same variable, and u5 and
v5 must be the same variable. Since sylv and sylv# are both homomorphic
images of baxt [Gir12, Proposition 3.7], the identity u = v is also satified
by sylv and sylv# . Since sylv is left-cancellative by Lemma 3.9, u3 u4 u5 u6 =
v3 v4 v5 v6 is satisfied by sylv and is thus equivalent to xyxy = yxxy. The
aim is to characterize u = v up to equivalence, so assume that u3 u4 u5 u6 =
v3 v4 v5 v6 actually is the identity xyxy = yxxy.
Since sylv# is right-cancellative by Lemma 3.13, u1 u2 u3 u4 = v1 v2 v3 v4 is
satisfied by sylv# and is thus equivalent to yxyx = yxxy, which is equivalent
(by swapping the two sides) to yxxy = yxyx and (by interchaning x and y) to
xyxy = xyyx. Combining these with u3 u4 u5 u6 = v3 v4 v5 v6 from the previous
paragraph shows that u = v is (up to equivalence) either yxxyxy = yxyxxy
or xyxyxy = xyyxxy.
Finally, it is necessary to show that no length-5 identity is satisfied by
baxt. Suppose u = v is an identity of length 5 satisfied by the Baxter monoid.
Suppose that u = u1 u2 · · · u5 and v = v1 v2 · · · v5 , where ui , vi ∈ {x, y}. As
before, considering the root symbols of the left-hand and right-hand trees in
Pbaxt (w) shows that u1 and v1 must be the same symbol, and that u5 and
v5 must the same symbol.
Since sylv and sylv# are both homomorphic images of baxt [Gir12, Proposition 3.7], both of them satisfy the identity u = v. Furthermore, sylv# is
right-cancellative and so satisfies the identity u1 u2 u3 u4 = v1 v2 v3 v4 ; while
sylv is left-cancellative and so satisfies the identity u2 u3 u4 u5 = v2 v3 v4 v5 . By
Proposition 3.12, the unique length-4 identity satisfied by sylv is xyxy =
yxxy, so the identity u = v is either xxyxy = xyxxy or yxyxy = yyxxy.
Deleting the rightmost symbol y from each of these identities yields xxyx =
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
17
xyxx and yxyx = yyxx, one of which must the identity u1 u2 u3 u4 = v1 v2 v3 v4
satisfied by sylv# . This is a contradiction, since by Proposition 3.16 the only
length-4 identity satisfied by sylv# is yxyx = yxxy.
3.6. Left and right patience sorting monoids. The present authors and
Silva [CMS, § 3.8] have shown that the elements PlPS (21) and PlPS (1) generate a free submonoid of lPS , and that the elements PrPS (2) and PrPS (31)
generate a free submonoid of rPS. Since free monoids of rank at least 2
satisfy no non-trivial identities, it follows that neither lPS nor rPS satisfy a
non-trivial identity.
Let lPSn = A∗n /≡lPS (where ≡lPS is naturally restricted to A∗n ×A∗n ) be the
left patience sorting monoid of rank n. Let rPSn = A∗n /≡rPS (where ≡rPS is
naturally restricted to A∗n ×A∗n ) be the right patience sorting monoid of rank
n. Clearly lPSn is a submonoid of lPS and rPSn is a submonoid of rPS. Then
by the previous paragraph, lPSn for n ≥ 2 satisfies no non-trivial identities,
while lPS1 , as a monogenic monoid, is of course commutative and satisfies the
identity xy = yx. Similarly, rPSn for n ≥ 3 satisfies no non-trivial identities,
while rPS1 , as a monogenic monoid, is of course commutative and satisfies
the identity xy = yx. Finally, rPS2 satisfies the identity xyxy = xyyx,
and, up to equivalence, this is the shortest identity satisfied by rPS2 [CMS,
Proposition 3.29].
3.7. Plactic monoid. Whether the plactic monoid satisfies a non-trivial
identity remains an open question, but some partial results are known. Let
placn = A∗n /≡plac (where ≡plac is naturally restricted to A∗n × A∗n ) be the
plactic monoid of rank n; clearly placn is a submonoid of plac.
First, plac1 is monogenic and thus commutative and satisfies xy = yx.
Kubat & Okniński [KO14] have shown that plac2 satisfies Adian’s identity
xyyxxyxyyx = xyyxyxxyyx, and that plac3 satisfies the identity pqqpqp =
pqpqqp, where p(x, y) and q(x, y) are respectively the left and right side of
Adian’s identity (and so the identity pqqpqp = pqpqqp has sixty variables
x or y on each side). Furthermore, plac3 does not satisfy Adian’s identity
[KO14, p. 111–2].
Conjecture 3.19. For each n ≥ 4, there is a non-trivial identity satisfied
by placn .
Conjecture 3.20. There is no non-trivial identity satisfied by plac.
References
[Adi66]
S. Adian. ‘Defining relations and algorithmic problems for groups and
semigroups’. Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov, 85 (1966), pp. 3–123. url:
http://www.mathnet.ru/eng/tm2766.
[CEK+ 01] J. Cassaigne, M. Espie, D. Krob, J.-C. Novelli, & F. Hivert. ‘The Chinese Monoid’. Int. J. Alg. Comput., 11, no. 03 (2001), pp. 301–334. doi:
10.1142/S0218196701000425.
[CM17]
A. J. Cain & A. Malheiro. ‘Crystallizing the hypoplactic monoid: from quasiKashiwara operators to the Robinson–Schensted–Knuth-type correspondence
for quasi-ribbon tableaux’. J. Algebraic Combin., 45, no. 2 (2017), pp. 475–524.
doi: 10.1007/s10801-016-0714-6.
[CMS]
A. J. Cain, A. Malheiro, & F. Silva. ‘The monoids of the patience sorting
algorithm’. In preparation.
18
[DK94]
[Ful97]
[Gir12]
[Gro81]
[HNT05]
[HNT07]
[Jed11]
[JO11]
[KO14]
[KT97]
[Lot02]
[LS78]
[LS81]
[LS85]
[LS90]
[Mac08]
[Mal53]
[Nov00]
[NT63]
[Pri13]
[Rey07]
ALAN J. CAIN AND ANTÓNIO MALHEIRO
G. Duchamp & D. Krob. ‘Plactic-growth-like monoids’. In M. Ito &
H. Jürgensen, eds, Words, languages and combinatorics, II, p. 124–142, River
Edge, NJ, 1994. World Scientific.
W. Fulton. Young Tableaux: With Applications to Representation Theory and
Geometry. No. 35 in LMS Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
S. Giraudo. ‘Algebraic and combinatorial structures on pairs of twin binary
trees’. J. Algebra, 360 (2012), pp. 115–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2012.03.020.
M. Gromov. ‘Groups of polynomial growth and expanding maps’.
Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci., 53 (1981), pp. 53–78. url:
http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PMIHES_1981__53__53_0.
F. Hivert, J.-C. Novelli, & J.-Y. Thibon. ‘The algebra of binary search
trees’. Theoret. Comput. Sci., 339, no. 1 (2005), pp. 129–165. doi:
10.1016/j.tcs.2005.01.012.
F. Hivert, J.-C. Novelli, & J.-Y. Thibon. ‘Commutative combinatorial
Hopf algebras’. J Algebr Comb, 28, no. 1 (2007), pp. 65–95. doi:
10.1007/s10801-007-0077-0.
F. Jedrzejewski. ‘Plactic classification of modes’. In C. Agon, M. Andreatta,
G. Assayag, E. Amiot, J. Bresson, & J. Mandereau, eds, Mathematics and
Computation in Music, no. 6726 in Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pp. 350–
353. Springer, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-21590-2 31.
J. Jaszuńska & J. Okniński. ‘Structure of Chinese algebras’. J. Algebra, 346,
no. 1 (2011), pp. 31–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2011.08.020.
L. Kubat & J. Okniński. ‘Identities of the plactic monoid’. Semigroup Forum,
90, no. 1 (2014), pp. 100–112. doi: 10.1007/s00233-014-9609-9.
D. Krob & J.-Y. Thibon. ‘Noncommutative Symmetric Functions IV: Quantum
Linear Groups and Hecke Algebras at q = 0’. J. Algebraic Combin., 6, no. 4
(1997), pp. 339–376. doi: 10.1023/A:1008673127310.
M. Lothaire. Algebraic Combinatorics on Words. No. 90 in Encyclopedia of
Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
A. Lascoux & M.-P. Schützenberger. ‘Sur une conjecture de H. O. Foulkes’. C.
R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B, 286, no. 7 (1978), pp. A323–A324.
A. Lascoux & M.-P. Schützenberger. ‘Le monoı̈de plaxique’. In Noncommutative structures in algebra and geometric combinatorics, no. 109 in
Quaderni de ”La Ricerca Scientifica”, pp. 129–156, Rome, 1981. CNR. url:
http://igm.univ-mlv.fr/~ berstel/Mps/Travaux/A/1981-1PlaxiqueNaples.pdf.
A. Lascoux & M.-P. Schützenberger. ‘Schubert polynomials and the
Littlewood-Richardson rule’. Lett. Math. Phys., 10, no. 2-3 (1985), pp. 111–124.
doi: 10.1007/BF00398147.
A. Lascoux & M.-P. Schützenberger. ‘Tableaux and noncommutative Schubert polynomials’. Funct. Anal. Its. Appl., 23, no. 3 (1990), pp. 223–225. doi:
10.1007/BF01079531.
I. Macdonald. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Clarendon Press,
Oxford University Press, 2008.
A. Malcev. ‘Nilpotent semigroups’. Ivanov. Gos. Ped. Inst., Uchenye Zap.,
Fiz.-Mat. Nauki, 4 (1953), pp. 107–111.
J.-C. Novelli. ‘On the hypoplactic monoid’. Discrete Mathematics, 217, no. 1-3
(2000), pp. 315–336. doi: 10.1016/S0012-365X(99)00270-8.
B. Neumann & T. Taylor. ‘Subsemigroups of Nilpotent Groups’. Proc. Roy.
Soc. Ser. A, 274 (1963), pp. 1–4.
J.-B. Priez. ‘A lattice of combinatorial Hopf algebras: Binary trees with multiplicities’. In Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics, Nancy, 2013.
The Association. Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science. url:
http://www.dmtcs.org/pdfpapers/dmAS0196.pdf.
M. Rey. ‘Algebraic constructions on set partitions’. In Formal Power
Series
and Algebraic
Combinatorics,
2007.
url:
http://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~ rey/articles/rey-fpsac07.pdf.
IDENTITIES IN PLACTIC, HYPOPLACTIC, AND RELATED MONOIDS
[Shn93]
[TY11]
19
L. Shneerson. ‘Identities in finitely generated semigroups of polynomial
growth’. J. Algebra, 154, no. 1 (1993), pp. 67–85. doi: 10.1006/jabr.1993.1004.
H. Thomas & A. Yong. ‘Longest increasing subsequences, Plancherel-type measure and the Hecke insertion algorithm’. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 46,
no. 1 (2011), pp. 610–642. doi: 10.1016/j.aam.2009.07.005.
Centro de Matemática e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia,
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829–516 Caparica, Portugal
E-mail address: [email protected]
Departamento de Matemática & Centro de Matemática e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829–516 Caparica, Portugal
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 4math.GR
|
A NOTE ON NILPOTENT SUBGROUPS OF
AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF RAAGS
arXiv:1803.08284v1 [math.GR] 22 Mar 2018
JAVIER ARAMAYONA & ANTHONY GENEVOIS
Abstract. We observe that automorphism groups of right-angled Artin
groups contain nilpotent non-abelian subgroups, namely H3 (Z) the threedimensional integer Heisenberg group, provided they admit a certain
type of element, called an adjacent transvection. This represents a (minor) extension of a result of Charney-Vogtmann.
1. Introduction
Automorphism groups of right-angled Artin groups (RAAGs) are normally studied through their comparison with linear groups and automorphism groups of free groups (and thus, by extension, with mapping class
groups). One fact that distinguishes the linear group GL(n, Z) from the automorphism group Aut(Fn ) of the free group Fn , and from the mapping class
group Mod(S), is that every solvable subgroup of the latter two is virtually
abelian; see [2, 1] and [3], respectively. In sharp contrast, arbitrary automorphism groups of RAAGs may contain a copy of GL(n, Z) with n ≥ 3. Even
when this is not the case, Charney-Vogtmann [6] proved that (outer) automorphism groups of RAAGs contain torsion-free nilpotent and non-abelian
subgroups, whenever they contain at least two adjacent transvections; see
below for a definition. Further examples may be found in [7].
The purpose of this short note is to observe that the presence of a single
adjacent transvection suffices for the (full) automorphism group of a centerless RAAG to contain a nilpotent non-abelian subgroup. We remark that
Charney-Vogtmann showed [6], if there are no adjacent transvections then
every solvable subgroup is virtually abelian.
Before we state our result, denote by ≤ the usual partial order in the
vertex set V (Γ) of Γ; see Section 2. Also, let H3 (Z) be the three-dimensional
integer Heisenberg group, which has presentation
H3 (Z) = hA, B, C | [A, C] = [B, C] = 1, [A, B] = Ci.
With this notation, we will observe:
Theorem 1.1. Let Γ be a simplicial graph. If there are adjacent vertices
a, b ∈ V (Γ) with a ≤ b, such that b is not adjacent to all the vertices of Γ,
then H3 (Z) is a subgroup of Aut(AΓ ).
As a consequence, for such Γ the group Aut(AΓ ) does not embed in
Mod(S) or Aut(Fn ). A further immediate application, surely well-known
to experts, is that no finite-index subgroup of such Aut(AΓ ) may act nicely
on non-positively curved space:
1
2
JAVIER ARAMAYONA & ANTHONY GENEVOIS
Corollary 1.2. If Γ is as in Theorem 1.1 , then no finite-index subgroup of
Aut(AΓ ) can act properly by semi-simple isometries on a CAT(0) space.
In sharp contrast, Aut(AΓ ) and Out(AΓ ) are sometimes commensurable
to a right-angled Artin group [5, 7], and therefore they act nicely on CAT(0)
spaces.
2. Definitions
In order to make this note as concise and self-contained as possible, we
only introduce the objects that we will need in the proof of our results.
We refer the reader to the various papers in the bibliography below for a
thorough introduction to automorphism groups of right-angled Artin groups.
Let Γ be a simplicial graph, and denote by V (Γ) (resp. E(Γ)) its set of
vertices (resp. edges). The right-angled Artin group AΓ defined by Γ is the
group given by the presentation
AΓ = hv ∈ V (Γ) | [v, w] = 1 ⇐⇒ vw ∈ E(Γ)i .
Given a right-angled Artin group AΓ , we consider its automorphism group
Aut(AΓ ). This is a finitely presented group with an explicit generating set
[11, 12] and an explicit (although in slightly different terms) presentation
[9].
Here, we will need a specific type of element of Aut(AΓ ) and Out(AΓ ),
called a tranvection. Given vertices v, w ∈ V (Γ), the transvection tvw is the
self-map of AΓ defined by
tvw : v 7→ vw
and tvw (u) = u for every u 6= v. An easy observation is that tvw ∈ Aut(AΓ )
if and only if lk(v) ⊂ st(w); here, lk(·) denotes the link of a vertex in Γ,
while st(·) denotes its star, namely the link union the vertex. As usual in
the literature, we will write v ≤ w to mean lk(v) ⊂ st(w), noting that the
relation ≤ is in fact a partial order. Finally, we say that tvw is an adjacent
transvection if v and w are adjacent in Γ.
3. A homomorphic image of the Heisenberg group
We now prove Theorem 1.1:
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Let a, b be adjacent vertices of Γ, with a ≤ b and
which are not adjacent to all the vertices of Γ. We write ca and cb for the
automorphisms of AΓ given by conjugation by a and b, respectively. Finally,
let t = tab the transvection that sends a to ab and fixes the rest of generators.
First, observe that ca and cb commute since a and b are adjacent. Next,
we claim that [cb , t] = 1 also. Indeed, if v 6= a,
tcb t−1 (v) = tcb (v) = t(bvb−1 ) = bvb−1 = cb (v),
and
tcb t−1 (a) = tcb (ab−1 ) = t(bab−2 ) = babb−2 = cb (a).
Finally, we claim that tca t−1 = cb ca . Indeed, if v 6= a then
tca t−1 (v) = tca (v) = t(ava−1 ) = abvb−1 a−1 = cb ca (v),
A NOTE ON NILPOTENT SUBGROUPS OF AUTOMORPHISM GROUPS OF RAAGS 3
while
tca t−1 (a) = tca (ab−1 ) = t(a2 b−1 a−1 ) = ababb−1 b−1 a−1 = cb ca (a),
as desired.
In light of the above, and using notation for the presentation of H3 (Z)
given in the introduction, the map H3 (Z) → Aut(AΓ ) given by A 7→ ca ,
B 7→ t, and C 7→ cb is a homomorphism. Now, we want to prove that this
is a monomorphism.
From the presentation of H3 (Z), it clearly follows that any of its elements
can be written as Am B n C p for some m, n, p ∈ Z. Furthermore, Am B n C p = 1
if and only if m = n = p = 0. Indeed, we first deduce from the equality
Am B n C p = 1 that m = n = 0 by looking at the image of Am B n C p into
the abelianization of H3 (Z); therefore, our equality reduces to C p = 1, and
finally p = 0 follows from the torsion-freeness of H3 (Z). Thus, in order to
prove that our homomorphism H3 (Z) → Aut(ΓG) is injective, we only have
n p
to verify that, for every m, n, p ∈ Z, cm
a t cb = 1 implies m = n = p = 0.
n p
So let m, n, p ∈ Z and suppose that cm
a t cb = 1. Noticing that
n p
m n p −p
m n
m
n
m n −m
cm
= abn ,
a t cb (a) = ca t (b ab ) = ca t (a) = ca (ab ) = a ab a
p
we first deduce that n = 0. Therefore, cm
a cb = 1. This precisely means that
m
p
a b belongs to the center of AΓ . On the other, the center of AΓ corresponds
exactly to the subgroup generated by the vertices which are adjacent to all
the vertices of Γ. Because we supposed that neither a nor b is adjacent to
all the vertices of Γ, it follows that am bp = 1. Therefore, we deduce that
am = bp = 1, and finally that m = p = 0 by torsion-freeness of AΓ .
4. Actions on CAT(0) spaces
We prove Corollary 1.2:
Proof. Let Γ as in Theorem 1.1, so there exist adjacent vertices a, b ∈ V (Γ)
with a ≤ b and which are not adjacent to all the vertices of Γ. As above,
write ca and cb for the conjugations on a and b, respectively, and t for the
transvection tab . Notice that ca and cb are infinite-order automorphisms
because a and b do not belong to the center of AΓ .
Consider a finite-index subgroup G < Aut(AΓ ); as such, there exists some
m m
m ≥ 1 such that cm
a , cb , t ∈ G. It is immediate to check that, for all n ∈ N,
(1)
−n
mn
tn cm
= cm
a t
a cb .
Suppose now that G acts properly by semi-simple isometries on some CAT(0)
m
space X. As cm
a and cb commute, the Flat Torus Theorem [4] implies that
X contains an isometrically embedded copy of a Euclidean plane, on which
m
cm
a and cb act by translations with quotient a 2-torus. It follows that, as
mn must tend
a transformation of this plane, the translation length of cm
a cb
to infinity as n grows; on the other hand, equation (1) implies that this
translation length must be equal to that of cm
a . This is a contradiction, and
the result follows.
A possible interpretation of the previous proof is the following. As Theorem 1.1 proves, Aut(ΓG) contains a copy of the three-dimensional integer
4
JAVIER ARAMAYONA & ANTHONY GENEVOIS
Heisenberg group
H3 (Z) = hA, B, C | [A, C] = [B, C] = 1, [A, B] = Ci.
It is not difficult to notice that, for any k ≥ 1, the subgroup hAk , B k , C k i ≤
H3 (Z) is naturally isomorphic to H3 (Z) itself, so that any finite-index subgroup of Aut(ΓG) has to contain a copy of H3 (Z). Therefore, Corollary 1.2
follows from the fact that H3 (Z) does not act properly by simple-isometries
on a CAT(0) space. This is essentially what we have shown in the previous
proof. An alternative argument can be found in [10, Corollary 5.1], where
it is furthermore proved that, for any proper action of H3 (Z) on a CAT(0)
space, C is necessarily parabolic. It is worth noticing that H3 (Z) has a
proper parabolic action on the complex hyperbolic plance H2C , which is a
proper finite-dimensional CAT(−1) space [10, Corollary 5.1].
References
[1] E. Alibegović, Translation lengths in Out(Fn ), Geom. Dedicata 92 (1), pp. 87–93
(2002).
[2] M. Bestvina, M. Feighn, M. Handel, Solvable subgroups of Out(Fn ) are virtually
Abelian, Geom. Dedicata 104 (1), pp. 71–96 (2004).
[3] J. Birman, A. Lubotzky, J. McCarthy, Abelian and solvable subgroups of the mapping class groups, Duke Math. J. 50 (4), pp. 1107–1120 (1983).
[4] M. R. Bridson, A. Haefliger, Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Grundlehren
der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 319, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1999).
[5] R. Charney, M. Farber, Random groups arising as graph products, Alg. Geom. Topol.
12, pp. 979–995 (2012).
[6] R. Charney, K. Vogtmann. Subgroups and quotients of automorphism groups of
RAAGs. In Low-dimensional and symplectic topology, pp. 9–27, Proc. Sympos. Pure
Math., 82, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2011).
[7] M. Day, Finiteness of outer automorphism groups of random right-angled Artin
groups, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 12 (3), pp. 1553–1583 (2012).
[8] M. Day, On solvable subgroups of automorphism groups of right-angled Artin groups,
Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 21, pp. 61–70 (2011).
[9] M. Day. Peak reduction and finite presentations for automorphism groups of right
angled Artin groups, Geom. Topol. 13, pp. 817–855 (2009).
[10] K. Fujiwara, T. Shioya, S. Yamagata, Parabolic isometries of CAT(0) spaces and
CAT(0) dimensions, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 4, pp. 861–892 (2004).
[11] M. R. Laurence, A generating set for the automorphism group of a graph group, J.
London Math. Soc. 52 (2), pp. 318–334 (1995).
[12] H. Servatius, Automorphisms of graph groups, J. Algebra 126 (1), pp. 34–60 (1989).
| 4math.GR
|
arXiv:1711.04052v1 [math.AC] 11 Nov 2017
BIG COHEN-MACAULAY MODULES,
MORPHISMS OF PERFECT COMPLEXES, AND
INTERSECTION THEOREMS IN LOCAL ALGEBRA
LUCHEZAR L. AVRAMOV, SRIKANTH B. IYENGAR, AND AMNON NEEMAN
Abstract. There is a well known link from the first topic in the title to the
third one. In this paper we thread that link through the second topic. The
central result is a criterion for the tensor nilpotence of morphisms of perfect
complexes over commutative noetherian rings, in terms of a numerical invariant of the complexes known as their level. Applications to local rings include a
strengthening of the Improved New Intersection Theorem, short direct proofs
of several results equivalent to it, and lower bounds on the ranks of the modules in every finite free complex that admits a structure of differential graded
module over the Koszul complex on some system of parameters.
1. Introduction
A big Cohen-Macaulay module over a commutative noetherian local ring R is a
(not necessarily finitely generated) R-module C such that some system of parameters of R forms a C-regular sequence. In [16] Hochster showed that the existence
of such modules implies several fundamental homological properties of finitely generated R-modules. In [17], published in [18], he proved that big Cohen-Macaulay
modules exist for algebras over fields, and conjectured their existence in the case
of mixed characteristic. This was recently proved by Y. André in [2]; as a major
consequence many “Homological Conjectures” in local algebra are now theorems.
A perfect R-complex is a bounded complex of finite projective R-modules. Its
level with respect to R, introduced in [6] and defined in 2.3, measures the minimal
number of mapping cones needed to assemble a quasi-isomorphic complex from
bounded complexes of finite projective modules with differentials equal to zero.
The main result of this paper, which appears as Theorem 3.3, is the following
Tensor Nilpotence Theorem. Let f : G → F be a morphism of perfect complexes
over a commutative noetherian ring R.
If f factors through a complex whose homology is I-torsion for some ideal I of
R with height I ≥ levelR HomR (G, F ), then the induced morphism
⊗nR f : ⊗nR G → ⊗nR F
is homotopic to zero for some non-negative integer n.
Date: November 15, 2017.
2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 13D22 (primary); 13D02, 13D09 (secondary).
Key words and phrases. big Cohen-Macaulay module, homological conjectures, level, perfect
complex, rank, tensor nilpotent morphism.
Partly supported by NSF grants DMS-1103176 (LLA) and DMS-1700985 (SBI).
1
2
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
Big Cohen-Macaulay modules play an essential, if discreet role in the proof, as a tool
for constructing special morphisms in the derived category of R; see Proposition 3.7.
In applications to commutative algebra it is convenient to use another property
of morphisms of perfect complexes: f is fiberwise zero if H(k(p) ⊗R f ) = 0 holds for
every p in Spec R. Hopkins [21] and Neeman [25] have shown that this is equivalent
to tensor nilpotence; this is a key tool for the classification of the thick subcategories
of perfect R-complexes.
It is easy to see that the level of a complex does not exceed its span, defined
in 2.1. Due to these remarks, the Tensor Nilpotence Theorem is equivalent to the
Morphic Intersection Theorem. If f is not fiberwise zero and factors through
a complex with I-torsion homology for an ideal I of R, then there are inequalities:
span F + span G − 1 ≥ levelR HomR (G, F ) ≥ height I + 1 .
In Section 4 we use this result to prove directly, and sometimes to generalize
and sharpen, several basic theorems in commutative algebra. These include the
Improved New Intersection Theorem, the Monomial Theorem and several versions
of the Canonical Element Theorem. All of them are equivalent, but we do not
know if they imply the Morphic Intersection Theorem; a potentially significant
obstruction to that is that the difference span F − levelR F can be arbitrarily big.
Another application, in Section 5, yields lower bounds for ranks of certain finite
free complexes, related to a conjecture of Buchsbaum and Eisenbud, and Horrocks.
In [7] a version of the Morphic Intersection Theorem for certain tensor triangulated categories is proved. This has implications for morphisms of perfect complexes
of sheaves and, more generally, of perfect differential sheaves, over schemes.
2. Perfect complexes
Throughout this paper R will be a commutative noetherian ring.
This section is a recap on the various notions and construction, mainly concerning
perfect complexes, needed in this work. Pertinent references include [6, 26].
2.1. Complexes. In this work, an R-complex (a shorthand for ‘a complex of Rmodules’) is a sequence of homomorphisms of R-modules
X :=
∂X
X
∂n−1
n
→ Xn−1 −−−→ Xn−2 −→ · · ·
· · · −→ Xn −−−
such that ∂ X ∂ X = 0. We write X ♮ for the graded R-module underlying X. The ith
i
X
suspension of X is the R-complex Σi X with (Σi X)n = Xn−i and ∂nΣ X = (−1)i ∂n−i
for each n. The span of X is the number
span X := sup{i | Xi 6= 0} − inf{i | Xi 6= 0} + 1
Thus span X = −∞ if and only if X = 0, and span X = ∞ if and only if Xi 6= 0
for infinitely many i ≥ 0. The span of X is finite if and only if span X is an natural
number. When span X is finite we say that X is bounded.
Complexes of R-modules are objects of two distinct categories.
In the category of complexes C(R) a morphism f : Y → X of R-complexes is a
family (fi : Yi → Xi )i∈Z or R-linear maps satisfying ∂iX fi = fi−1 ∂iY . It is a quasiisomorphism if H(f ), the induced map in homology, is bijective. Complexes that
can be linked by a string of quasi-isomorphisms are said to be quasi-isomorphic.
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
3
The derived category D(R) is obtained from C(R) by inverting all quasi-isomorphisms. For constructions of the localization functor C(R) → D(R) and of the
derived functors ?⊗LR ? and RHomR (¿, ?), see e.g. [13, 31, 24]. When P is a complex
of projectives with Pi = 0 for i ≪ 0, the functors P ⊗LR ? and RHomR (P, ?) are
represented by P ⊗R ? and HomR (P, ?), respectively. In particular, the localization
functor induces for each n a natural isomorphism of abelian groups
∼ HomD(R) (P, Σn X) .
(2.1.1)
H−n (RHomR (P, X)) =
2.2. Perfect complexes. In C(R), a perfect R-complex is a bounded complex
of finitely generated projective R-modules. When P is perfect, the R-complex
P ∗ := HomR (P, R) is perfect and the natural biduality map
P −→ P ∗∗ = HomR (HomR (P, R), R)
is an isomorphism. Moreover for any R-complex X the natural map
P ∗ ⊗R X −→ HomR (P, X)
is an isomorphism. In the sequel these properties are used without comment.
2.3. Levels. A length l semiprojective filtration of an R-complex P is a sequence
of R-subcomplexes of finitely generated projective modules
0 = P (0) ⊆ P (1) ⊆ · · · ⊆ P (l) = P
♮
♮
such that P (i − 1) is a direct summand of P (i) and the differential of P (i)/P (i−1)
is equal to zero, for i = 1, . . . , l. For every R-complex F , we set
F is a retract of some R-complex P that
R
.
level F = inf l ∈ N
has a semiprojective filtration of length l
By [6, 2.4], this number is equal to the level F with respect to R, defined in [6, 2.1].
In particular, levelR F is finite if and only if F is quasi-isomorphic to some perfect
complex. When F is quasi-isomorphic to a perfect complex P , one has
levelR F ≤ span P .
(2.3.1)
Indeed, if P := 0 → Pb → · · · → Pa → 0, then consider the filtration by subcomplexes P (n) := P<n+a . The inequality can be strict; see 2.7 below.
When R is regular, any R-complex F with H(F ) finitely generated satisfies
levelR F ≤ dim R + 1 .
(2.3.2)
For R-complexes X and Y one has
(2.3.3)
levelR (Σi X) = levelR X
for every integer i, and
R
level (X ⊕ Y ) = max{levelR X, levelR Y }.
These equalities follow easily from the definitions.
Lemma 2.4. The following statements hold for every perfect R-complex P .
(1) levelR (P ∗ ) = levelR P .
(2) For each perfect R-complex Q there are inequalities
levelR (P ⊗R Q) ≤ levelR P + levelR Q − 1 .
levelR HomR (P, Q) ≤ levelR P + levelR Q − 1 .
4
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
Proof. (1) If P is a retract of P ′ , then levelR P ≤ levelR P ′ and P ∗ is a retract of
(P ′ )∗ . Thus, we can assume P itself has a finite semiprojective filtration {P (n)}ln=0 .
The inclusions P (l − i) ⊆ P (l − i + 1) ⊆ P define subcomplexes
∗
P ∗ (i) := Ker(P ∗ −→ P (l − i) ) ⊆ Ker(P ∗ −→ P (l − i + 1)) =: P ∗ (i + 1)
of finitely generated projective modules. They form a length l semiprojective filtration of P ∗ , as P ∗ (i − 1)♮ is a direct summand of P ∗ (i)♮ and there are isomorphisms
∗
P ∗ (n) ∼ P (l − n + 1)
.
=
P ∗ (n − 1)
P (l − n)
This gives levelR P ∗ ≤ levelR P , and the reverse inequality follows from P ∼
= P ∗∗ .
(2) Assume first that P has a semiprojective filtration {P (n)}ln=0 and Q has a
semiprojective filtration {Q(n)}m
n=0 . For all h, i, we identity P (h) ⊗R Q(i) with a
subcomplex of P ⊗R Q. For each non-negative integer n ≥ 0 form the subcomplex
X
C(n) :=
P (j + 1) ⊗R Q(n − j)
j>0
of P ⊗R Q. A direct computation yields an isomorphism of R-complexes
Q(n − j)
C(n) ∼ X P (j + 1)
⊗R
.
=
C(n − 1)
P (j)
Q(n − j − 1)
j>0
l+m−1
{C(n)}n=0
Thus
is a semiprojective filtration of P ⊗R Q.
The second inequality in (2) follows from the first one, given (1) and the isomorphism HomR (P, Q) ∼
= P ∗ ⊗R Q. Next we verify the first inequality. There is nothing
to prove unless the levels of P and Q are finite. Thus we may assume that P is a
retract of a complex P ′ with a semiprojective filtration of length l = levelR P and Q
is a retract of a complex Q′ with a semiprojective filtration of length m = levelR Q.
Then P ⊗R Q is a retract of P ′ ⊗R Q′ , and—by what we have just seen—this
complex has a semiprojective filtration of length l + m − 1, as desired.
2.5. Ghost maps. A ghost is a morphism g : X → Y in D(R) such that H(g) = 0;
see [11, §8]. Evidently a composition of morphisms one of which is ghost is a ghost.
The next result is a version of the “Ghost Lemma”; cf. [11, Theorem 8.3], [29,
Lemma 4.11], and [5, Proposition 2.9].
Lemma 2.6. Let F be an R-complex and c an integer with c ≥ levelR F .
When g : X → Y is a composition of c ghosts the following morphisms are ghosts
F ⊗LR g : F ⊗LR X −→ F ⊗LR Y
and
RHomR (F, g) : RHomR (F, X) −→ RHomR (F, Y )
Proof. For every R-complex W there is a canonical isomorphism
≃
RHomR (F, R) ⊗LR W −−→ RHomR (F, W ) ,
so it suffices to prove the first assertion. For that, we may assume that F has a
semiprojective filtration {F (n)}ln=0 , where l = levelR F . By hypothesis, g = h ◦ f
where f : X → W is a (c − 1)fold composition of ghosts and h : W → Y is a ghost.
Tensoring these maps with the exact sequence of R-complexes
ι
π
0 −→ F (1) −−→ F −−→ G −→ 0
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
5
where G := F/F (1), yields a commutative diagram of graded R-modules
H(F (1) ⊗R X)
// H(F ⊗R X)
H(F (1)⊗f )
// H(G ⊗R X)
H(F ⊗f )
H(F (1) ⊗R W )
H(ι⊗W )
// H(F ⊗R W )
H(F (1)⊗h)
H(G⊗f )
H(π⊗W )
// H(G ⊗R W )
H(F ⊗h)
H(F (1) ⊗R Y )
H(ι⊗Y )
// H(F ⊗R Y )
// H(G ⊗R Y )
where the rows are exact. Since levelR G ≤ l − 1 ≤ c − 1, the induction hypothesis
implies G ⊗ f is a ghost; that is to say, H(G ⊗ f ) = 0. The commutativity of the
diagram above and the exactness of the middle row implies that
Im H(F ⊗ f ) ⊆ Im H(ι ⊗ W )
This entails the inclusion below.
Im H(F ⊗ g) = H(F ⊗ h)(Im H(F ⊗ f ))
⊆ H(F ⊗ h)(Im H(ι ⊗ W ))
⊆ Im H(ι ⊗ Y ) H(F (1) ⊗ h))
=0
The second equality comes from the commutativity of the diagram. The last one
holds because F (1) is graded-projective and H(h) = 0 imply H(F (1) ⊗ h) = 0.
2.7. Koszul complexes. Let x := x1 , . . . , xn be elements in R.
♮
We write K(x) for the Koszul complex on x. Thus K(x) is the exterior algebra
K
on a free R-module K(x)1 with basis {e
x1 , . . . , x
en }, and ∂ is the unique R-linear
map that satisfies the Leibniz rule and has ∂(e
xi ) = xi for i = 1, . . . , n. In particular,
K(x) is a DG (differential graded) algebra, and so its homology H(K(x)) is a graded
algebra with H0 (K(x)) = R/(x). This implies (x) H(K(x)) = 0.
Evidently K(x) is a perfect R-complex; it is indecomposable when R is local;
see [1, 4.7]. As K(x)i is non-zero precisely for 0, . . . , n, from (2.3.1) one gets
levelR K(x) ≤ span K(x) = n + 1 .
Equality holds if R is local and x is a system of parameters; see Theorem 4.2 below.
However, span K(x) − levelR K(x) can be arbitrarily large; see [1, Section 3].
For any Koszul complex K on n elements, there are isomorphisms of R-complexes
n
M
n
Σi K ( i ) .
K∗ ∼
=
= Σ−n K and K ⊗R K ∼
i=0
See [8, Propositions 1.6.10 and 1.6.21]. It thus follows from (2.3.3) that
(2.7.1)
levelR HomR (K, K) = levelR (K ⊗R K) = levelR K .
In particular, the inequalities in Lemma 2.4(2) can be strict.
3. Tensor nilpotent morphisms
In this section we prove the Tensor Nilpotence Theorem announced in the introduction. We start by reviewing the properties of interest.
6
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
3.1. Tensor nilpotence. Let f : Y → X be a morphism in D(R).
The morphism f is said to be tensor nilpotent if for some n ∈ N the morphism
f ⊗L · · · ⊗L f : Y ⊗LR · · · ⊗LR Y −→ X ⊗LR · · · ⊗LR X
| R {z R }
n
is equal to zero in D(R); when the R-complexes X, Y are perfect this means that
the morphism ⊗n f : ⊗nR Y → ⊗nR X is homotopic to zero. When X is perfect and
f : X → Σl X is a morphism with ⊗n f homotopic to zero the n-fold composition
Σl f
Σ2l f
Σnl
X −→ Σl X −−−→ Σ2n X −−−−→ · · · −−−→ Σnl X
is also homotopic to zero. The converse does not hold, even when R is a field for
in that case tensor nilpotent morphisms are zero.
3.2. Fiberwise zero morphisms. A morphism f : Y → X that satisfies
k(p) ⊗LR f = 0
in D(k(p))
for every p ∈ Spec R
is said to be fiberwise zero. This is equivalent to requiring k ⊗LR f = 0 in D(k) for
every homomorphism R → k with k a field. In D(k) a morphism is zero if (and
only if) it is a ghost, so the latter condition is equivalent to H(k ⊗LR f ) = 0.
In D(k), a morphism is tensor nilpotent exactly when it is zero. Thus if f is
tensor nilpotent, it is fiberwise zero. There is a partial converse: If a morphism
f : G → F of perfect R-complexes is fiberwise zero, then it is tensor nilpotent. This
was proved by Hopkins [21, Theorem 10] and Neeman [25, Theorem 1.1].
The next result is the Tensor Nilpotence Theorem from the Introduction. Recall
that an R-module is said to be I-torsion if each one of its elements is annihilated
by some power of I.
Theorem 3.3. Let R be a commutative noetherian ring and f : G → F a morphism
of perfect R-complexes. If for some ideal I of R the following conditions hold
(1) f factors through some complex with I-torsion homology, and
(2) levelR HomR (G, F ) ≤ height I ,
then f is fiberwise zero. In particular, f is tensor nilpotent.
The proof of the theorem is given after Proposition 3.7.
Remark 3.4. Lemma 2.4 shows that the inequality (2) is implied by
levelR F + levelR G ≤ height I + 1 ;
the converse does not hold; see (2.7.1).
On the other hand, condition (2) cannot be weakened: Let (R, m, k) be a local
ring and G the Koszul complex on some system of parameters of R and let
f : G −→ (G/G6d−1 ) ∼
= Σd R
be the canonical surjection with d = dim R. Then G is an m-torsion complex and
levelR G = d + 1; see 2.7. Evidently H(k ⊗R f ) 6= 0, so f is not fiberwise zero.
In the proof of Theorem 3.3 we exploit the functorial nature of I-torsion.
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
7
3.5. Torsion complexes. The derived I-torsion functor assigns to every X in
D(R) an R-complex RΓI X; when X is a module it computes its local cohomology:
HnI (X) = H−n (RΓI X) holds for each integer n. There is a natural morphism
t : RΓI X −→ X in D(R) that has the following universal property: Every morphism
Y → X such that H(Y ) is I-torsion factors uniquely through t; see Lipman [24,
Section 1]. It is easy to verify that the following conditions are equivalent.
(1) H(X) is I-torsion.
(2) H(X)p = 0 for each prime ideal p 6⊇ I.
(3) The natural morphism t : RΓI X → X is a quasi-isomorphism.
When they hold, we say that X is I-torsion. Note a couple of properties:
(3.5.1)
(3.5.2)
If X is I-torsion, then X ⊗LR Y is I-torsion for any R-complex Y .
There is a natural isomorphism RΓI (X ⊗L Y ) ∼
= (RΓI X) ⊗L Y .
R
R
Indeed, H(Xp ) ∼
= H(X)p = 0 holds for each p 6⊇ I, giving Xp = 0 in D(R). Thus
(X ⊗LR Y )p ∼
= Xp ⊗LR Y ∼
=0
holds in D(R). It yields H(X ⊗LR Y )p ∼
= H((X ⊗LR Y )p ) = 0, as desired.
A proof of the isomorphism in (3.5.2) can be found in [24, 3.3.1].
3.6. Big Cohen-Macaulay modules. Let (R, m, k) be a local ring.
A (not necessarily finitely generated) R-module C is big Cohen-Macaulay if every
system of parameters for R is a C-regular sequence, in the sense of [8, Definition
1.1.1]. In the literature the name is sometimes used for R-modules C that satisfy
the property for some system of parameters for R; however, the m-adic completion
of C is then big Cohen-Macaulay in the sense above; see [8, Corollary 8.5.3].
The existence of big Cohen-Macaulay was proved by Hochster [16, 17] in case
when R contains a field as a subring, and by André [2] when it does not; for the
latter case, see also Heitmann and Ma [15].
In this paper, big Cohen-Macaulay modules are visible only in the next result.
Proposition 3.7. Let I be an ideal in R and set c := height I.
When C is a big Cohen-Macaulay R-module the following assertions hold.
(1) The canonical morphism t : RΓI C → C from the I-torsion complex RΓI C
(see 3.5) is a composition of c ghosts.
(2) If a morphism g : G → C of R-complexes with levelR G ≤ c factors through
some I-torsion complex, then g = 0.
Proof. (1) We may assume I = (x), where x = {x1 , . . . , xc } is part of a system of
parameters for R; see [8, Theorem A.2]. The morphism t factors as
RΓ(x1 ,...,xc ) (C) −→ RΓ(x1 ,...,xc−1 ) (C) −→ · · · −→ RΓ(x1 ) (C) −→ C .
Since the sequence x1 , . . . , xc is C-regular, we have Hi (RΓ(x1 ,...,xj ) (C)) = 0 for
i 6= −j; see [8, (3.5.6) and (1.6.16)]. Thus every one of the arrows above is a ghost,
so that t is a composition of c ghosts, as desired.
(2) Suppose g factors as G → X → C with X an I-torsion R-complex. As noted
in 3.5, the morphism X → C factors through t, so g factors as
g′
g′′
t
G −→ X −→ RΓI C −
→C.
8
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
In view of the hypothesis levelR G ≤ c and part (1), Lemma 2.6 shows that
RHomR (G, t) : RHomR (G, RΓI C) −→ RHomR (G, C)
is a ghost. Using brackets to denote cohomology classes, we get
[g] = [tg ′′ g ′ ] = H0 (RHomR (G, t))([g ′′ g ′ ]) = 0 .
Due to the isomorphism (2.1.1), this means that g is zero in D(R).
Lemma 3.8. Let f : G → F be a morphism of perfect R-complexes, where G is
finite free with Gi = 0 for i ≪ 0 and F is perfect. Let f ′ : F ∗ ⊗R G → R denote
the composed morphism in the next display, where e is the evaluation map:
F ∗ ⊗R f
e
F ∗ ⊗R G −−−−−−→ F ∗ ⊗R F −−→ R .
If f factors through some I-torsion complex, then so does f ′ .
The morphism f ′ is fiberwise zero if and only if so is f .
Proof. For the first assertion, note that if f factors through an I-torsion complex
X, then F ∗ ⊗R f factors through F ∗ ⊗R X, and the latter is I-torsion.
For the second assertion, let k be field and R → k be a homomorphism of rings.
Let (−) and (−)∨ stand for k ⊗R (−) and Homk (−, k), respectively. The goal is to
prove that f = 0 is equivalent to f ′ = 0.
Since F is perfect, there are canonical isomorphisms
∼
∨
=
F ∗ ⊗ k −−→ HomR (F, k) ∼
= Homk (k ⊗R F, k) = (F ) .
Given this, it follows that f ′ can be realized as the composition of morphisms
∨
(F ) ⊗k f
∨
∨
e
(F ) ⊗k G −−−−−−→ (F ) ⊗k F −−→ k .
If F is zero, then f = 0 and f ′ = 0 hold. When F is nonzero, it is easy to verify
6 0 is equivalent to f ′ 6= 0, as desired.
that f =
Proof of Theorem 3.3. Given morphisms of R-complexes G → X → F such that F
and G are perfect and X is I-torsion for an ideal I with
levelR HomR (G, F ) ≤ height I ,
we need to prove that f is fiberwise zero. This implies the tensor nilpotence of f ,
as recalled in 3.1.
By Lemma 3.8, the morphism f ′ : F ∗ ⊗R G → R factors through an I-torsion
complex, and if f ′ is fiberwise zero, so if f . The isomorphisms of R-complexes
(F ∗ ⊗R G)∗ ∼
= G∗ ⊗R F ∼
= HomR (G, F )
and Lemma 2.4 yield levelR (F ∗ ⊗R G) = levelR HomR (G, F ). Thus, replacing f
by f ′ , it suffices to prove that if f : G → R is a morphism that factors through an
I-torsion complex and satisfies levelR G ≤ height I, then f is fiberwise zero.
Fix p in Spec R. When p 6⊇ I we have Xp = 0, by 3.5(2). For p ⊇ I we have
levelRp Gp ≤ levelR G ≤ height I ≤ height Ip ,
where the first inequality follows directly from the definitions; see [6, Proposition
3.7]. It is easy to verify that Xp is Ip -torsion. Thus, localizing at p, we may further
assume (R, m, k) is a local ring, and we have to prove that H(k ⊗R f ) = 0 holds.
Let C be a big Cohen-Macaulay R-module. It satisfies mC 6= C, so the canonical
γ
ε
f
γ
map π : R → k factors as R −
→C −
→ k. The composition G −
→R−
→ C is zero in
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
9
D(R), by Proposition 3.7. We get πf = εγf = 0, whence H(k ⊗R π) H(k ⊗R f ) = 0.
Since H(k ⊗R π) is bijective, this implies H(k ⊗R f ) = 0, as desired.
The following consequence of Theorem 3.3 is often helpful.
Corollary 3.9. Let (R, m, k) be a local ring, F a perfect R-complex, and G an
R-complex of finitely generated free modules.
If a morphism of R-complexes f : G → F satisfies the conditions
(1) f factors through some m-torsion complex,
(2) sup F ♮ − inf G♮ ≤ dim R − 1, and
then H(k ⊗R f ) = 0.
Proof. An m-torsion complex X satisfies k(p) ⊗LR X = 0 for any p in Spec R \ {m}.
Thus a morphism, g, of R-complexes that factors through X is fiberwise zero if and
only if k ⊗LR g = 0. This remark will be used in what follows.
Condition (2) implies Gn = 0 for n ≪ 0. Let f ′ denote the composition
F ∗ ⊗R f
e
F ∗ ⊗R G −−−−−−→ F ∗ ⊗R F −−→ R ,
where e is the evaluation map. Since inf (F ∗ ⊗R G)♮ = − sup F ♮ +inf G♮ , Lemma 3.8
shows that it suffices to prove the corollary for morphisms f : G → R.
As f factors through some m-torsion complex, so does the composite morphism
f
G60 ⊆ G −−→ R
It is easy to check that if the induced map H(k ⊗R G60 ) → H(k ⊗R R) = k is zero,
then so is H(k ⊗R f ). Thus we may assume Gn = 0 for n 6∈ [−d + 1, 0], where
d = dim R. This implies levelR G ≤ d, so Theorem 3.3 yields the desideratum.
For some applications the next statement, with weaker hypothesis but also
weaker conclusion, suffices. The example in Remark 3.4 shows that the result
cannot be strengthened to conclude that f is fiberwise zero.
Theorem 3.10. Let R be a local ring and f : G → F a morphism of R-complexes.
If there exists an ideal I of R such that
(1) f factors through an I-torsion complex, and
(2) levelR F ≤ height I,
then H(C ⊗LR f ) = 0 for every big Cohen-Macaulay module C.
Proof. Set c := height I and let t : RΓI C → C be the canonical morphism. It
follows from (3.5.1) that C ⊗LR f also factors through an I-torsion R-complex. Then
the quasi-isomorphism (3.5.2) and the universal property of the derived I-torsion
functor, see 3.5, implies that C ⊗LR f factors as a composition of the morphisms:
t⊗L F
R
C ⊗LR G −→ (RΓI C) ⊗LR F −−−−
−→ C ⊗LR F
By Proposition 3.7(1) the morphism t is a composition of c ghosts. Thus condition
(2) and Lemma 2.6 imply t ⊗LR F is a ghost, and hence so is C ⊗LR f .
10
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
4. Applications to local algebra
In this section we record applications the Tensor Nilpotence Theorem to local
algebra. To that end it is expedient to reformulate it as the Morphic Intersection
Theorem from the Introduction, restated below.
Theorem 4.1. Let R be a commutative noetherian ring and f : G → F a morphism
of perfect R-complexes.
If f is not fiberwise zero and factors through a complex with I-torsion homology
for an ideal I of R, then there are inequalities:
span F + span G − 1 ≥ levelR HomR (G, F ) ≥ height I + 1 .
Proof. The inequality on the left comes from Lemma 2.4 and (2.3.1). The one on
the right is the contrapositive of Theorem 3.3.
Here is one consequence.
Theorem 4.2. Let R be a local ring and F a complex of finite free R-modules:
F :=
0 → Fd → Fd−1 → · · · → F0 → 0
For each ideal I such that I · Hi (F ) = 0 for i ≥ 1 and I · z = 0 for some element z
in H0 (F ) \ m H0 (F ), where m is the maximal ideal of R, one has
d + 1 ≥ span F ≥ levelR F ≥ height I + 1 .
Proof. Indeed, the first two inequalities are clear from definitions. As to third
one, pick ze ∈ F0 representing z in H0 (F ) and consider the morphism of complexes
f : R → F given by r 7→ re
z . Since z is not in m H0 (F ), one has
H0 (k ⊗R f ) = k ⊗R H0 (f ) 6= 0
for k = R/m. In particular, k⊗R f is nonzero. On the other hand, f factors through
the inclusion X ⊆ F , where X is the subcomplex defined by
(
Fi
i≥1
Xi =
Re
z + d(F1 ) i = 0
By construction, we have Hi (X) = Hi (F ) for i ≥ 1 and I H0 (X) = 0, so H(X) is
I-torsion. The desired inequality now follows from Theorem 4.1 applied to f .
The preceding result is a stronger form of the Improved New Intersection Theorem1 of Evans and Griffith [12]; see also [19, §2]. First, the latter is in terms of
spans of perfect complexes whereas the one above is in terms of levels with respect
to R; second, the hypothesis on the homology of F is weaker. Theorem 4.2 also
subsumes prior extensions of the New Intersection Theorem to statements involving
levels, namely [6, Theorem 5.1], where it was assumed that I · H0 (F ) = 0 holds,
and [1, Theorem 3.1] which requires Hi (F ) to have finite length for i ≥ 1.
In the influential paper [18], Hochster identified certain canonical elements in the
local cohomology of local rings, conjectured that they are never zero, and proved
that statement in the equal characteristic case. He also gave several reformulations
that do not involve local cohomology. Detailed discussions of the relations between
these statements and the histories of their proofs are presented in [28] and [20].
1This and the other statements in this section were conjectures prior to the appearance of [2].
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
11
Some of those statements concern properties of morphisms from the Koszul complex on some system of parameters to resolutions of various R-modules. This makes
them particularly amenable to approaches from the Morphic Intersection Theorem.
In the rest of this section we uncover direct paths to various forms of the Canonical
Element Theorem and related results.
We first prove a version of [18, 2.3]. The conclusion there is that fd is not zero,
but the remarks in [18, 2.2(6)] show that it is equivalent to the following statement.
Theorem 4.3. Let (R, m, k) be a local ring, x a system of parameters for R, and
K the Koszul complex on x, and F a complex of free R-modules.
If f : K → F is a morphism of R-complexes with H0 (k ⊗R f ) 6= 0, then one has
Hd (S ⊗R f ) 6= 0
for
S = R/(x)
and
d = dim R .
Proof. Recall from 2.7 that ∂(K) lies in (x)K, that K1 has a basis x
e1 , . . . , x
ed and K ♮
is the exterior algebra on K1 . Thus Kd is a free R-module with basis x = x
e1 · · · x
ed
and Hd (S ⊗R K) = S(1 ⊗ x), so we need to prove f (Kd ) 6⊆ (x)Fd + ∂(Fd+1 ).
Arguing by contradiction, we suppose the contrary. This means
f (x) = x1 y1 + · · · + xd yd + ∂ F (y)
with y1 , . . . , yd ∈ Fd and y ∈ Fd+1 . For i = 1, . . . , d set x∗i := x
e1 · · · x
ei−1 x
ei+1 · · · x
ed ;
thus {x∗1 , . . . , x∗d } is a basis of the R-module Kd−1 . Define R-linear maps
hd−1 : Kd−1 → Fd
by
hd : Kd → Fd+1
by
hd−1 (x∗i ) = (−1)i−1 yi
for i = 1, . . . , d .
hd (x) = y .
Extend them to a degree one map h : K → F with hi = 0 for i 6= d − 1, d. The map
g := f − ∂ F h − h∂ K : K → F
is easily seen to be a morphism of complexes that is homotopic to f and satisfies
gd = 0. This last condition implies that g factors as a composition of morphisms
g′
K −−→ F<d ⊆ F .
The complex K is m-torsion; see 2.7. Thus Corollary 3.9, applied to g ′ , yields
H(k ⊗R g ′ ) = 0. This gives the second equality below:
H0 (k ⊗R f ) = H0 (k ⊗R g) = H0 (k ⊗R g ′ ) = 0 .
The first one holds because f and g are homotopic, and the last one because g0 = g0′ .
The result of the last computation contradicts the hypotheses on H0 (k ⊗R f ).
A first specialization is the Canonical Element Theorem.
Corollary 4.4. Let I be an ideal in R containing a system of parameters x1 , . . . , xd .
With K the Koszul complex on x and F a free resolution of R/I, any morphism
f : K → F of R-complexes lifting the surjection R/(x) → R/I has fd (K) 6= 0.
As usual, when A is a matrix, Id (A) denotes the ideal of its minors of size d.
Corollary 4.5. Let R be a local ring, x a system of parameters for R, and y a
finite subset of R with (y) ⊇ (x).
If A is a matrix such that Ay = x, then Id (A) 6⊆ (x) for d = dim R.
12
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
Proof. Let K and F be the Koszul complexes on x and y, respectively. The matrix
A defines a unique morphism of DG R-algebras f : K → F . Evidently, H0 (k ⊗R f )
is the identity map on k, and hence is not zero. Since fd can be represented by a
column matrix whose entries are the various d×d minors of A, the desired statement
is a direct consequence of Theorem 4.3.
A special case of the preceding result yields the Monomial Theorem.
Corollary 4.6. When y1 , . . . , yd is a system of parameters for local ring, one has
(y1 · · · yd )n 6∈ (y1n+1 , . . . , ydn+1 )
Proof. Apply Corollary 4.5 to the inclusion
n
y1 0
0 y2n
A:= .
..
..
.
0
0
for every integer
n ≥ 1.
(y1n+1 , . . . , ydn+1 ) ⊆ (y1 , . . . , yd ) and
··· 0
··· 0
.. .
..
.
.
· · · ydn
We also deduce from Theorem 4.3 another form of the Canonical Element Theorem. Roberts [27] proposed the statement and proved that it is equivalent to the
Canonical Element Theorem; a different proof appears in Huneke and Koh [22].
Recall that for any pair (S, T ) of R-algebras the graded module TorR (S, T ) carries a natural structure of graded-commutative R-algebra, given by the ⋔-product
of Cartan and Eilenberg [10, Chapter XI.4].
Lemma 4.7. Let R be a commutative ring, I an ideal of R, and set S := R/I. Let
G → S be some R-free resolution, K be the Koszul complex on some generating set
of I, and g : K → G a morphisms of R-complexes lifting the identity of S.
For every surjective homomorphism ψ : S → T of of commutative rings there is
a commutative diagram of strictly graded-commutative S-algebras
S ⊗R K
V
S H1 (S ⊗R K)
α
V
ψ
// // V TorR
1 (S, S)
S
µS
TorR
1 (S,ψ)
V
T
TorR
1 (S, T )
// TorR (S, S)
TorR (S,ψ)
µT
// TorR (S, T )
where α1 = H1 (S⊗R g), the map α is defined by the functoriality of exterior algebras,
and the maps µ? are defined by the universal property of exterior algebras.
V
Proof. The equality follows from ∂ K (K) ⊆ IK and K ♮ = R K1 . The resolution
G can be chosen to have G61 = K61 ; this makes α1 surjective, and the surjectivity of α follows. The map TorR
1 (S, ψ) is surjective because it can be identified
with the natural map I/I 2 → I/IJ, where J = Ker(R → T ); the surjectivity of
V
R
ψ Tor1 (S, ψ) follows. The square commutes by the naturality of ⋔-products.
Theorem 4.8. Let (R, m, k) be a local ring, I a parameter ideal, and S := R/I.
For each surjective homomorphism S → T the morphism of graded T -algebras
V
R
µT : T TorR
1 (S, T ) −→ Tor (S, T )
has the property that µT ⊗T k is injective. In particular, µk is injective.
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
13
Proof. The functoriality of the construction of µ implies that the canonical surjection π : T → k induces a commutative diagram of graded-commutative algebras
V
T
V
π
TorR
1 (S, T )
µT
// TorR (S, T )
TorR
1 (S,π)
V
k
TorR (S,π)
TorR
1 (S, k)
µk
// TorR (S, k)
It is easy to verify that π induces a bijective map
R
R
TorR
1 (S, π) ⊗T k : Tor1 (S, T ) ⊗T k → Tor1 (S, k) ,
so (∧π TorR (S, π)) ⊗T k is an isomorphism. Thus it suffices to show µk is injective.
≃
Let K be the Koszul complex on a minimal generating set of I. Let G −
→ S and
≃
F −
→ k be R-free resolutions of S and k, respectively. Lift the identity map of S
and the canonical surjection ψ : S → k to morphisms g : K → G and h : G → F ,
respectively. We have µS α = H(S ⊗R g) and TorR (S, ψ) = H(S ⊗R h). This implies
the second equality in the string
R
S
µkd TorR
d (S, π)αd = Tord (S, ψ)µd αd = Hd (S ⊗R hg) 6= 0 .
The first equality comes from Lemma 4.7, with T = k, and the non-equality from
Theorem 4.3, with f = hg. In particular, we get µkd 6= 0. We have an isomorphism
∼ V k d of graded k-algebras, so µk is injective by the next remark.
TorR
1 (S, k) =
k
V
Remark 4.9. If Q is a field, d is a non-negative integer, and λ : Q Qd → B is a
homomorphism of graded Q-algebras with λd 6= 0, then λ is injective.
V
Vd
Indeed, the graded subspace Q Qd of exterior algebra Q Qd is contained in
every every non-zero ideal and has rank one, so λd 6= 0 implies Ker(λ) = 0.
5. Ranks in finite free complexes
This section is concerned with DG modules over Koszul complexes on sequences
of parameters. Under the additional assumptions that R is a domain and F is a
resolution of some R-module, the theorem below was proved in [3, 6.4.1], and earlier
for cyclic modules in [9, 1.4]; background is reviewed after the proof. The Canonical
Element Theorem, in the form of Theorem 4.3 above, is used in the proof.
Theorem 5.1. Let (R, m, k) be a local ring, set d = dim R, and let F be a complex
of finite free R-modules with H0 (F ) 6= 0 and Fi = 0 for i < 0.
If F admits a structure of DG module over the Koszul complex on some system
of parameters of R, then there is an inequality
d
(5.1.1)
rankR (Fn ) ≥
for each n ∈ Z .
n
Proof. The desired inequality is vacuous when d = 0, so suppose d ≥ 1. Let x be
the said system of parameters of R and K the Koszul complex on x. Since F is a
DG K-module, each Hi (F ) is an R/(x)-module, and hence of finite length.
First we reduce to the case when R is a domain. To that end, let p be a prime
ideal of R such that dim(R/p) = d. Evidently, the image of x in R is a system of
14
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
parameters for R/p. By base change, (R/p) ⊗R F is a DG module over (R/p) ⊗R K,
the Koszul complex on x with coefficients in R/p, with
∼ R/p ⊗ H0 (F ) 6= 0 .
H0 ((R/p) ⊗R F ) =
♮
Moreover, the rank of F ♮ as an R-module equals the rank of (R/p) ⊗R F as an
R/p-module. Thus, after base change to R/p we can assume R is a domain.
Choose a cycle z ∈ F0 that maps to a minimal generator of the R-module H0 (F ).
Since F is a DG K-module, this yields a morphism of DG K-modules
f: K →F
with
f (a) = az .
This is, in particular, a morphism of complexes. Since k ⊗R H0 (F ) 6= 0, by the
choice of z, Theorem 4.3 applies, and yields that f (Kd ) 6= 0. Since R is a domain,
this implies f (Q ⊗R Kd ) is non-zero, where Q is the field of fractions of R.
♮
Set Λ := (Q ⊗R K) and consider the homomorphism of graded Λ-modules
V
λ := Q ⊗R f ♮ : Λ → Q ⊗R F ♮ .
Qd , Remark 4.9 gives the inequality in the display
d
rankR (Fn ) = rankQ (Q ⊗R Fn ) ≥ rankQ (Λn ) =
.
n
As Λ is isomorphic to
Q
Both equalities are clear.
The inequalities (5.1.1) are related to a major topic of research in commutative
algebra. We discuss it for a local ring (R, m, k) and a bounded R-complex F of
finite free modules with F<0 = 0, homology of finite length, and H0 (F ) 6= 0.
5.2. Ranks of syzygies. The celebrated and still open Rank Conjecture of Buchsbaum and Eisenbud [9, Proposition 1.4], and Horrocks [14, Problem 24] predicts
that (5.1.1) holds whenever F is a resolution of some module ofPfinite length.
That conjecture is known for d ≤ 4. Its validity would imply n rankR Fn ≥ 2d .
For d = 5 and equicharacteristic R, this was proved in [4, Proposition 1] by using
Evans and Griffth’s Syzygy Theorem [12]; in view of [2], it holds for all R.
M. Walker [30] used methods from K-theory to prove that
P In a breakthrough,
d
rank
F
≥
2
holds
when R contains 12 and is complete intersection (in particR
n
n
ular, regular), and when R is an algebra over some field of positive characteristic.
5.3. Obstructions for DG module structures. Theorem 5.1 provides a series
of obstruction for the existence of any DG module structure on F . In particular, it
implies that if rankR F < 2d holds with d = dim R, then F supports no DG module
structure over K(x) for any system of parameters x. Complexes satisfying the
restriction on ranks were recently constructed in [23, 4.1]. These complexes have
nonzero homology in degrees 0 and 1, so they are not resolutions of R-modules.
5.4. DG module structures on resolutions. Let F be a minimal resolution of
an R-module M of nonzero finite length and x a parameter set for R with xM = 0.
When F admits a DG module structure over K(x) the Rank Conjecture holds,
by Theorem 5.1. It was conjectured in [9, 1.2′ ] that such a structure exists for all
F and x. An obstruction to its existence was found in [3, 1.2], and examples when
that obstruction is not zero were produced in [3, 2.4.2]. On the other hand, by [3,
1.8] the obstruction vanishes when x lies in m annR (M ).
TENSOR NILPOTENT MORPHISMS
15
It is not known if F supports some DG K(x)-module structure for special choices
of x; in particular, for high powers of systems of parameters contained in annR (M ).
References
[1] H. Altmann, E Grifo, J. Montaño, W. Sanders, T. Vu, Lower bounds on levels of perfect
complexes, J. Algebra 491 (2017), 343–356.
[2] Y. André, La conjecture du facteur direct, preprint, arXiv:1609.00345.
[3] L. L. Avramov, Obstructions to the existence of multiplicative structures on minimal free
resolutions, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1987), 1–31.
[4] L. L. Avramov, R.-O. Buchweitz, Lower bounds on Betti numbers, Compositio Math. 86
(1993), 147–158.
[5] L. L. Avramov, R.-O. Buchweitz, S. Iyengar, Class and rank of differential modules, Invent.
Math. 169 (2007), 1–35.
[6] L. L. Avramov, R.-O. Buchweitz, S. B. Iyengar, C. Miller, Homology of perfect complexes,
Adv. Math. 223 (2010), 1731–1781; Corrigendum, Adv. Math. 225 (2010), 3576–3578.
[7] L. L. Avramov, S. B. Iyengar, A. Neeman, work in progress.
[8] W. Bruns, J. Herzog, Cohen-Macaulay Rings (Revised ed.), Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math.
39, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1998.
[9] D. Buchsbaum, D. Eisenbud, Algebra structures for finite free resolutions, and some structure
theorems for ideals of codimension 3, Amer. J. Math. 99 (1977), 447–485.
[10] H. Cartan, S. Eilenberg, Homological algebra, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,
1956.
[11] D. Christensen, Ideals in triangulated categories: Phantoms, ghosts and skeleta, Adv. Math.
136 (1998), 284–339.
[12] G. E. Evans, P. Griffith, The syzygy problem, Annals of Math. (2) 114 (1981), 323–333.
[13] S. I. Gelfand, Y. I. Manin, Methods of Homological Algebra, Annals of Math. (2) 114 (1981),
323–333.
[14] R. Hartshorne, Algebraic vector bundles on projective spaces: a problem list, Topology 18
(1979), 117–128.
[15] R. Heitmann, L. Ma, Big Cohen-Macaulay algebras and the vanishing conjecture for maps
of Tor in mixed characteristic, preprint, arXiv:1703.08281.
[16] M. Hochster, Cohen-Macaulay modules, Conference on Commutative Algebra (Univ. Kansas,
Lawrence, Kan., 1972), Lecture Notes in Math., 311, Springer, Berlin, 1973; pp. 120–152.
[17] M. Hochster, Deep local rings, Aarhus University preprint series, December 1973.
[18] M. Hochster, Topics in the Homological Theory of Modules over Commutative Rings, Conf.
Board Math. Sci. 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1975.
[19] M. Hochster, Canonical elements in local cohomology modules and the direct summand conjecture, J. Algebra 84 (1983), 503–553.
[20] M. Hochster, Homological conjectures and lim Cohen-Macaulay sequences, Homological and
Computational Methods in Commutative Algebra (Cortona, 2016), Springer INdAM Series,
Springer, Berlin, to appear.
[21] M. Hopkins, Global methods in homotopy theory. Homotopy Theory (Durham, 1985), 73–96,
London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 117, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1987.
[22] C. Huneke, J. Koh, Some dimension 3 cases of the Canonical Element Conjecture, Proc.
Amer. Math. Soc. 98 (1986), 394–398.
[23] S. B. Iyengar, M. E. Walker, Examples of finite free complexes of small rank and homology,
preprint, arXiv:1706.02156.
[24] J. Lipman, Lectures on local cohomology and duality, Local Cohomology and its Applications
(Guanajuato, 1999), Lecture Notes Pure Appl. Math. 226, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002;
pp. 39–89.
[25] A. Neeman, The chromatic tower for D(R), Topology 31 (1992), 519–532.
[26] P. C. Roberts, Homological Invariants of Modules over Commutative Rings, Sém. Math. Sup.
72, Presses Univ. Montréal, Montréal, 1980.
[27] P. C. Roberts, The equivalence of two forms of the Canonical Element Conjecture, undated
manuscript.
[28] P. C. Roberts, The homological conjectures, Progress in Commutative Algebra 1, de Gruyter,
Berlin, 2012; pp. 199–230.
16
L. L. AVRAMOV, S. B. IYENGAR, AND A. NEEMAN
[29] R. Rouquier, Dimensions of triangulated categories, J. K-Theory 1 (2008), 193–256, 257–258.
[30] M. E. Walker, Total Betti numbers of modules of finite projective dimension, Annals of Math.,
to appear; preprint, arXiv:1702.02560.
[31] C. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra, Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 38, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994.
Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, U.S.A.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, U.S.A.
E-mail address: [email protected]
Centre for Mathematics and its Applications, Mathematical Sciences Institute Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
E-mail address: [email protected]
| 0math.AC
|
arXiv:1802.03734v1 [math.OC] 11 Feb 2018
The Use of Presence Data in Modelling Demand
for Transportation
Jonathan Epperlein1 , Jaroslaw Legierski2,3 , Marcin Luckner3 ,
Jakub Mareček1∗ and Rahul Nair1
February 13, 2018
Abstract
We consider the applicability of the data from operators of cellular systems
to modelling demand for transportation. While individual-level data may contain
precise paths of movement, stringent privacy rules prohibit their use without consent.
Presence data aggregate the individual-level data to information on the numbers of
transactions at each base transceiver station (BTS) per each time period. Our work
is aimed at demonstrating value of such aggregate data for mobility management
while maintaining privacy of users. In particular, given mobile subscriber activity aggregated to short time intervals for a zone, a convex optimisation problem
estimates most likely transitions between zones. We demonstrate the method on
presence data from Warsaw, Poland, and compare with official demand estimates
obtained with classical econometric methods.
1
Introduction
Estimating travel demand is a key step of the transportation planning process. Cities
typically build a modeling framework and use surveys along with observations to
characterize how, where and by what means citizens move. These estimates are then
used for management of existing infrastructure or for design of new services. Such an
approach is resource-intensive, time consuming, and therefore can only be performed
infrequently providing estimates that may be out-of-date.
Alternatively, current movement patterns can be estimated based on data from mobile
devices. Several works have studied digital trajectories, or “breadcrumbs”, which
provide a very rich demand profile. Nevertheless, legislation and privacy regulation
∗ Jakub can be reached at [email protected]. 1: IBM Research – Ireland, B3 IBM Campus
Damastown, Dublin 15, Ireland. 2: Orange Labs Poland, 02-691 Warsaw, ul. Obrzezna 7, Poland. 3: Warsaw
University of Technology, Faculty of Mathematics and Information Science, 00-662 Warsaw, ul. Koszykowa
75, Poland.
1
often restrict the use of such methods. In Europe, in particular, requirements on
processing telecommunications transmission data are set by European directives:
I Personal data should be protected, as per directive on e-Privacy(2002/58/EC) and
directive on personal data protection (95/46/EC).
I The consent of the data subject is required for processing any subscriber personal
data.
I The anonymized data can be processed without consent only if they are aggregated
in the first step of processing and de-anonymization of the data is not possible.
The anonymized record cannot not be connected with any subscriber in any case.
The use and processing of CDR records without the permission of the subscriber is
hence not possible in the Europe, and one may need to rely on aggregate data.
In this paper, we present methods to estimate trip generation and trip distribution rates
from aggregate presence data. In particular, we consider mobile subscriber’s location
statistics aggregated in accordance with the above-mentioned regulations. We the
present a linear program to be solved for each period of the discretisation of time to
obtain the most likely estimate of movements since the previous period. We also present
algorithms for obtaining the estimates of movements of likely movements over a number
of periods, or consider a distribution of trip durations. Crucially, we show that the linear
program can be solved in linear time, which makes the approach applicable in practice.
2
2.1
The Problem
Data
The data comes in the form of time-stamped averages of event counts for each of a
number of geographical zones: (Zone, Timestamp, Event Count), where the zones are
defined by the local public transport operator.
More specifically: Say there are NZ zones Z1 , . . . , ZNZ , and we have a total of Nt time
intervals [t0 ,t1 ], [t1t2 ], . . . , [tNt −1 ,tNt ] for which the event counts are reported; here, the
intervals are all of equal length T , i.e. t` − t`−1 = T , but this is not necessary for the
applicability of what follows. Thus, the data consists of tuples of the form
(Zk ,t` , Ek,` )
for k = 1, . . . , NZ , ` = 1, . . . , Nt ,
which encode that “In zone Zk during the time interval [t`−1 ,t` ], Ek,` events were
observed.” Note that the timestamp of the end of the interval is reported in the dataset,
and that there are NZ · Nt such tuples.
For the purposes of this paper, we consider the number of events as a measure of how
many unique terminals (phones, pagers, etc.) were present in the give zone over the
given time interval.
2
2.2
Modelling user movement
The given data suggests how many terminals were present at any zone, but, due to
privacy restrictions, not which terminals were present where at what time. Hence, the
information as to how users move from one zone to another is lost, and the problem we
address in this paper is how to estimate this information from the aggregate data that we
are given. The problems treated are as follows:
Problem 1 (One-Step Transitions). Given aggregate presence data for disjoint geographical zones at two points in time, and a cost function mapping each pair of
geographical zones to a real number, estimate for each zone the proportion of users
travelling to each other zone, within the time interval between the two points in time.
Problem 2 (k-Step Transitions). Given aggregate presence data for disjoint geographical zones at two points t1 ,t2 in time and a cost function mapping each pair of geographical zones to a real number, estimate for each zone the proportion of users travelling to
each other zone, within time k(t2 − t1 ).
Problem 3 (Duration-L Transitions). Given aggregate presence data for disjoint geographical zones, for two or more points t1 ,t2 , . . . in time, and a cost function mapping
each pair of geographical zones to a real number, and a given trip duration L, estimate
for each zone the proportion of users travelling to each other zone, with trip duration
being L.
Problem 4 (Realistic Transitions). Given aggregate presence data for disjoint geographical zones, for two or more points t1 ,t2 , . . . in time, and a cost function mapping
each pair of geographical zones to a real number, and a distribution of trip durations,
as a histogram approximation of a probability density function fL , estimate for each
zone the proportion of users travelling to each other zone.
Absent further information, we have to make assumptions about user behaviour, and the
main assumption is that the users redistribute themselves in an optimal way – optimal
with respect to a cost function, the design of which requires insights into the underlying
transportation structure. This is best explained via a trivial-seeming example:
Assume first, that there are only two zones, Z1 and Z2 , and that we have the following
data:
(Z1 ,t1 , 3), (Z2 ,t1 , 1), (Z1 ,t2 , 2), (Z2 ,t2 , 2).
Intuitively, it seems obvious to expect that one user went from Zone 1 to Zone 2, whereas
all other stayed put. Of course, it is also possible that two users went from Zone 1 to
Zone 2 and the sole user in Zone 2 went to Zone 1. However, if we associate a cost to
users moving, then the first, intuitive solution, is clearly the optimal one.
Assume now, that there is a third zone, Z3 , and that we additionally have the following
data:
(Z3 ,t1 , 1), (Z3 ,t2 , 1).
A natural assumption is now that the user in Zone 3 simply stayed there. But what if
Zone 3 is connected to Zones 1 and 2 through rapid transit, whereas the only convenient
way of getting from Zone 1 to Zone 2 is through Zone 3, and this journey takes longer
than t2 − t1 ? In this case, the cost of travel from Z1 to Z2 would be quite high, and the
3
most reasonable and optimal solution would be to expect one user to move from Z1 to
Z3 and one user to move from Z3 to Z2 .
This example illustrates the idea of optimal user movement and highlights, how knowledge of the transportation system needs to be incorporated in the design of the cost
function. One can, for instance, benefit from the estimates of the travel-times provided
by Google Maps [36], use the Euclidean distance, or a discrete metric, in which adjacent
pairs of zones have cost 0 and all other pairs have cost 1. Either way, we will solve that
problem by casting it as a linear program, which will be formally defined in the next
section.
Finally, in Problem 4, note that we treat the travel time of all users of the road network
as a random variable L. For this random variable L, one assumes there exists probability
density function fX , i.e., a non-negative function:
Pr[a ≤ L ≤ b] =
Z b
a
fL (x) dx.
(1)
On the input, we assume a histogram approximation thereof, with the bins of the
histogram centered at multiples of the interval at which we sample the input data, i.e.,
t2 − t1 = tk+1 − tk . For example for the sampling at 1 minute, we would be given a list:
Pr[0 ≤ L < 1.5], Pr[1.5 ≤ L < 2.5], . . .
(2)
We note that such distributional data are regularly obtained by most operators of public
transport, either by surveys or by studying traces of individuals using personal seasonal
tickets, although the alignment of the bins may not readily match the sampling interval
of the presence data.
3
The Linear Program
First, we show that Problem 1 can be solved by a linear program.
3.1
Notation and preliminaries
Throughout, Z+ denotes the nonnegative integers, n and k are positive integers, 1n
denotes an n-dimensional column vector of all 1s, and In is the n-dimensional identity
matrix; the dimension n is omitted if it is clear from the context. We denote matrices
by capital letters, and their elements by the corresponding lower-case letters, e.g. for a
matrix M, mi j denotes the element in the ith row, jth column; M T denotes the transpose
of M; tr(M) = ∑i mii denotes the trace of the square matrix M. Note that with this
notation, we obtain the vector η of row-sums of M, i.e. η with ηi = ∑ j mi j , as η = M 1
and analogously we have γ T = 1T M for the vector of column-sums.
To keep the notation compact, we consider user movement between two consecutive
time intervals only; else, we’d have to include an index corresponding to the time stamp
4
in everything, which is unnecessary for the developments. In other words, we consider
a data set of the form
(Z1 ,t1 , E11 ), (Z2 ,t1 , E21 ), . . . ,
(3)
(ZNz ,t1 , ENz 1 ), (Z1 ,t2 , E12 ), . . . , (ZNz ,t2 , ENz 2 ).
Let E` denote the (column) vector of users present in all zones at time t` , i.e. E1 =
T
E11 E21 · · · ENZ 1 and so on. The number of users moving from Zi to Z j is
denoted by xi j and the matrix of flows is X ∈ RNz ×Nz ; this is the quantity we are
interested in finding. We denote the costs of moving from Zi to Z j by ci j ∈ R and collect
them in the matrix C ∈ RNz ×Nz .
3.2
Cost functions
The costs of moving from Zi to Z j is, in some sense, a parameter to the model. We have
conducted our experiments with three natural choices of the cost matrix C ∈ RNz ×Nz ,
but we do not claim these are original.
Let us have each zone Zi associated with a polygon, which is defined by a sequence of
corner-points in the Euclidean plane. Let us denote ki corner-points associated with Zi
x , zy ), (Px , Py ), . . . , (Px , Py ). In the adjacency metric, we consider:
by (Pi,1
i,2 i,2
i,1
i,ki i,ki
0
0.1
Ca (Zi , Z j ) :=
1
ifi = j
if ∃1 ≤ k1 ≤ ki , 1 ≤ k2 ≤ k j
x , Py ) = (Px , Py )
s.t. ∃(Pi,k
j,k2 j,k2
i,k1
1
otherwise
(4)
Considering the centroid of Zi :
k
centroid(Zi ) :=
k
y
i
i
Pi,x j ∑ j=1
Pi, j
∑ j=1
,
ki
ki
!
(5)
The centroidal distance Cc (Zi , Z j ) is the Euclidean distance between centroids centroid(Zi )
and centroid(Z j ) of the two zones. Finally, considering the closest corner-point associated with the other zone:
NN(Zi , Z j ) := arg
D(A, B) :=
q
min
min
y
y
x ,P
x
(Pi,k
i,k )1≤k1 ≤ki (Pj,k ,Pj,k )1≤k2 ≤ki
1
1
2
D(Pi,k1 , Pj,k2 )
2
(Ax − Bx )2 + (Ay − By )2 .
(6)
Distance Cd (Zi , Z j ) is then the Euclidean distance between NN(Zi , Z j ) and NN(Z j , Zi ).
One can clearly define many other cost matrices, e.g., considering free-flow travel times,
and introducing randomisation.
5
3.3
Constraints assuming a constant number of users over time
N
N
z
z
Ei1 = ∑i=1
Ei2 = N, i.e. that the number N of users in
As a first step, assume that ∑i=1
the entire network is the same in both time intervals. In order for a flow X to explain
the observations, it must “remove” Ei1 users from, and “place” E j2 users back in each
zone Zi (note that the number of users staying in Zi is xii ). The number of users moving
from Zi is then given by the row-sum ∑ j xi j , whereas the number of users moving to Zi
is given by the column-sum ∑k xki . Of course, flows have to be nonnegative, too. Using
the above notations, this translates to
X 1 = E1
(7)
T
X 1 = E2
(8)
X ≥ 0.
(9)
We note here that this set of constraints defines what is known as the (Nz , Nz )-transportation
polytope with marginals E1 and E2 . A further constraint can be added: in reality, only
integer numbers of users can move, hence we could also require X ∈ ZNz ×Nz . Since
we are only approximating anyway, this might or might not be a good idea. Note also
Lemma 5, which suggests that for integer marginals, the minimizer is also integral.
N
N
z
z
The total cost associated with a flow X is ∑i=1
ci j xi j = tr(CT X), and we find the
∑ j=1
flow X minimizing the overall cost – and hence an estimate of the true movement of
users between zones – as the solution to the following optimization problem:
z = tr(CT X)
minimize
X ≥0
subject to
3.4
(LP-C)
X 1 = E1
T
X 1 = E2 .
Constraints allowing for time-varying numbers of users
We cannot assume that the number of users stays constant: Users are arriving in the
covered area and leaving it, and of course devices are being turned off and on. To
address that, we introduce a sink/source zone and index it by Nz + 1. For this zone we
have
ci,Nz +1 = cost of user disappearing from Zi
cNz +1,i = cost of user spawning in Zi
The number of users in the sink/source zone can only be computed after the data at t2 is
available. Then, we let
Nz
Nz
δ12 = ∑ Ei1 − ∑ Ei2
i=1
i=1
and
ENz +1,1 = u,
ENz +1,2 = u + δ12 ,
6
where selecting a parameter u > 0 allows for consideration of users disappearing from Zi
and spawning in Z j instead of travelling from Zi to Z j . One might also consider adding
another sink/source for this specific purpose to gain more control over the cost: for
instance, if ci,Nz +1 and cNz +1, j are too small compared to ci j , the optimization problem
will always prefer disappearing/spawning over travel.
4
The Matrix Manipulations
Second, one should like go beyond a snapshot of transitions within a single interval
between two points in time, at which the presence data are available. We show that one
can manipulate the solution of the linear program (LP) of the previous section to derive
first the k-step transitions of Problem 2 and subsequently the solutions to Problems 3
and 4 by straightforward matrix manipulation.
4.1
Extrapolating the most recent one-step transitions
One possible solution to Problem 2 involves considering the output of the LP as a matrix
and raising it to the appropriate power. Let us return to our example, where we had
(Z1 ,t1 , 3), (Z2 ,t1 , 1), (Z1 ,t2 , 2), (Z2 ,t2 , 2).
We expect the flow of users to be X = 20 11 , in other words two users remain in Z1 , one
goes from Z1 to Z2 , and the user already in Z2 remains there. Another interpretation is
in terms of proportions: One third of the users in Z1 move to Z2 , whereas two thirds stay
put, and so on. Mathematically, that corresponds to normalizing each
of X to
h 2column
i
1
sum up to one (i.e. making X into a row-stochastic matrix), say Xe = 3 3 .
0 1
If this trend were to continue, then we’d have for the number of users in Z1 and Z2 at
time t3 :
E13 = xe11 E12 + xe21 E22
and
E23 = xe12 E12 + xe22 E22 .
This can be written compactly, and more generally, as the matrix-vector product
E`+1 = XeT E` , and with E1 given, we have E2 = XeT E1 and E3 = XeT E2 = XeT XeT E1
and eventually we get
T
E`+1 = Xe` E1 .
In the context of probability distributions (where the elements Ek` denote probability
mass instead of users), this is a well-known and thoroughly researched Markov chain,
and all results apply here. The most important one is that, should the trend continue forever, the system will (under mild conditions) settle into a steady state. More specifically,
there is a distribution of users f such that XeT f = f and as ` → ∞, we have E` → f .
7
4.2
Extrapolating k recent one-step transitions
If instead of just event counts at two time steps, we have event counts at several
consecutive time steps, another solution to Problem 2 would be to multiply by the
estimated one-step flow matrices in turn. To return to our example, let us extend it to:
(Z1 ,t1 , 3), (Z2 ,t1 , 1), (Z1 ,t2 , 2), (Z2 ,t2 , 2), (Z1 ,t3 , 3), (Z2 ,t3 , 1).
The flows
between times t1 and t2 would be as before, and from t2 to t3 we’d have
X2 = 21 01 , or after normalization:
Xe1 =
2
3
1
3
0
1
and
1
e
X2 = 1
2
0
1
2
.
Now the estimate for E4 would be E4 = Xe1T E3 = Xe1T Xe2T E2 = Xe1T Xe2T Xe1T E1 and in general
`/2
XeT XeT
E1
if ` even
1 2
E`+1 =
(`−1)/2
XeT XeT
Xe1T E1 if ` odd.
1 2
Because the product of row-stochastic matrices is again row-stochastic, this new Markov
chain may have a stationary distribution appearing every k time steps.
The apparent difficulty with a naive implementation of these approaches is runtime, in
particular when k is large. As we will show in the next section, there are surprisingly
efficient algorithms, though.
4.3
Approximating duration-L transitions
In order to solve Problem 3, it suffices to consider a convex combination of 2 solutions to
Problem 2 for suitable k. Consider the computation of duration-L transitions, where there
exist presence data at times tk ,tk+1 with tk ≤ L ≤ tk+1 . Consider the k-step transition
matrix Sk and (k + 1)-step transition matrix Sk+1 computed as a solution to Problem 2.
Clearly,
S=
L − tk
tk+1 − L
Sk +
Sk+1
tk+1 − tk
tk+1 − tk
(10)
is the solution to Problem 3.
4.4
Approximating realistic transitions
Finally, in order to solve Problem 4, one has to notice that the solution is a convex
combination of H solutions to Problem 2 for H bins of the histogram approximation.
8
Method
Run-time
Ref.
General-purpose interior-point method
Hungarian method
Augmenting-path algorithm
O(n7 ln(1/ε))
O(n4 )
O(n3 )
[10]
[17]
[15]
The proposed algorithm
O(n)
Theorem 6
Table 1: The complexity of solving the linear program (LP-C) in dimension n × n. We
note that it makes it possible to obtain the objective function value at cost O(n), while
retrieving the n × n matrix, at which this value is attained requires time O(n2 ).
Consider the H bins of the histogram with values:
h1 = Pr[0 ≤ L < 1.5]
h2 = Pr[1.5 ≤ L < 2.5]
...
hH = Pr[max supp L − 1 ≤ L < max supp L],
where max supp L is the largest possible realisation of L. It is clear that hi , 1 ≤ i ≤ H
can be seen as a probability mass function on a discretisation of L, with ∑H
i=1 hi = 1.
One can use hi as weights in a convex combination of the transition matrices, which is
a sum. For the first bin, we consider a solution S1 of Problem 1 with weight h1 as the
first summand. For the second bin, we consider a 2-step transition matrix S2 computed
as a solution to Problem 2 with weight h2 as the second summand. Subsequently, we
consider k-step transition matrix Sk , 2 < k ≤ H computed as a solution to Problem 2
with weight hk to obtain:
H
S = ∑ (hi Si ),
(11)
i=1
which is the solution to Problem 4.
5
Run-Time Analysis
5.1
Linear Programming
Next, let us consider whether a faster algorithm for solving the class of linear programming problems (13) are possible. We make use of:
Lemma 5 (E.g. [7, Lemma 2.2 and Corollary 2.11]). For the (p, q) transportation
polytope defined by γ and η we have:
1. it is nonempty if and only if 1Tq η = 1Tp γ, in other words if the sums of the marginals
are equal;
9
Method
Run-time
Ref.
Standard dense matrix multiplication
Present-best dense matrix multiplication
Fourier-transform-based methods
O(n3 )
Standard
[18]
[26]
O(n2.3728639 )
Õ(k + nb)
Table 2: The complexity of multiplying two sparse matrices, each in dimension n × n,
each with k non-zero coefficients, where the product has b non-zero coefficients.
2. all its vertices are integral, if η ∈ Zq and γ ∈ Z p , i.e. if the marginals are integral.
but we stress that the polytope has been studied very extensively over the past 70 years
and refer to [29, 30, 33] as standard references.
Now we state the main result:
Theorem 6. Given η, γ ∈ Zn+ , with 1T η = 1T γ = k, consider
z := max tr(X) s.t. X 1 = γ, X T 1 = η.
X∈Zn×n
+
(IP2)
Then, z = ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi . This is computable in time linear in n.
For the proof, please see the Appendix.
5.2
Sparse Matrix Multiplication
In addition to the complexity of the solving of the instance of the linear programming
problem, we may need to solve a number of matrix-matrix multiplication problems,
where the two matrices are sparse, each in dimension n × n, each with k non-zero
coefficients, and where the product has b non-zero coefficients. Using traditional dense
linear algebra, one can obtain the result in time O(n3 ), using more sophisticated methods
for dense matrices, one can improve this to O(nω ), ω ≈ 2.37.
Considering the sparsity of matrices A, B, however, Pagh [26] has shown methods that
there are based on conversion to polynomial:
n
p(x) =
n
n
∑ ( ∑ Aik s1 (i)xh1 (i) )( ∑ Bk j s2 ( j)xh2 ( j) )
k=1 i=1
j=1
and utilisation of fast Fourier transform for polynomial multiplication, which can
compute c0 , ..., cb−1 such that ∑i ci xi = (p(x) mod xb ) + (p(x) ÷ xb ) in time (n2 + nb),
with (AB)i j = s1 (i)s2 ( j)c(h1 (i)+h2 ( j)) mod b. Eventually, Pagh [26] shows that the
algorithm computes AB exactly in time (N + nb) with high probability. Although these
algorithms may not be easy to implement, related algorithms with simpler hashing
functions are readily implementable.
10
Table 3: Types of registered events: First two types are generated by a user (“active”),
while the following eight are generated by the network (“passive”).
I A cell identifier change reported in the access request procedure of any mobile
originated (MO) or mobile terminating (MT) transaction
I A cell identifier change reported when a cell identifier different from the one
stored in the visitor location register (VLR) is used in response to any mobile
terminating (MT) transaction
I Location update performed by a mobile station
I International mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) attached to a mobile station
changes
I A subscriber is deleted from the visitor location register
I The subscriber switches off the mobile station
I Mobile station is considered as detached by the network after a long period of
inactivity
I Cell identifier change is detected during GPRS activity
I Cell identifier change is detected during the provision of subscriber information
I During long calls, the visitor location register (VLR) may receive request messages to refresh subscriber data. In this way, the VLR notices that the cell identifier
arriving in the message differs from the one stored in a database.
6
Computational Experiments
For our preliminary experiments, we have used data collected from the Public Land
Mobile Network (PLMN) of Orange Polska within the municipal area of Warsaw. For
each base transceiver station (BTS) of each separate cellular system (2G/3G), we have
received the total numbers of connections from unique terminals per a unit of time. No
data other than the aggregate statistics were collected.
In particular, the data were collected by an internal transmission system, in which some
types of network events are associated with a location. Such events can be subdivided
into events generated by the user (“active”) or generated by the network (“passive”).
In Table 3, the first two bullet points capture events generated by the user. These
events relate to mobile terminating (MT) transactions, i.e., events registered during an
active use of a mobile terminal by the user. The following bullet points list event types
generated by the network. These events are generated without an active participation of
the user and include operations of the so-called visitor location register (VLR), which
tracks subscriber roaming within a mobile switching centre (MSC) location area, cell
identifier changes, International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI) changes, location
updates performed by a mobile station, and the switching of mobile stations.
Within the one week of data collected, the most frequent events were location updates,
while the cell identifier change was very rare. Figure 1 presents the evolution of the total
number of events during the period. The volumes of both active and passive events are
correlated with the time of day; the cyclical nature of the evolution of the volumes of
events over time is clear. The evolution of the numbers of passive events is more uneven
11
12
104
11
active
passive
104
10
10
Number of events
9
8
8
6
7
6
4
5
2
4
0
Jan 09, 08:00
Jan 10, 08:00
Jan 11, 08:00
Jan 12, 08:00
3
08:00:00 09:00:00 10:00:00
Jan 13, 08:00
2017
Figure 1: Total number of events vs time stamps, split by passive (magenta) and active
(black) events. The spike in passive events at 3:15am is an artefact of the data acquisition
system’s operation.
than that of the active events. The local maxima of the numbers of passive events at
3:15 a. m. are related with the operations of the data acquisition and processing system.
Further, note that the observed events are not equally distributed in the city. Figure 2
presents statistics of the number of events observed across all BTSs at a given time. The
large difference between mean and median, the wide interquartile range, and the very
large difference between maximum and mean number of events at all times suggest a
large variability in the distribution of events over the BTSs. This disproportion is the
result of differing population density, differing ranges of base transceiver stations, and
differing telecommunication technologies.
For comparison, we have used the estimates presently employed by the public transport
operator in Warsaw (ZTM). One should like to point out that the estimates of ZTM
imply a rather different distribution of the population across the zones than the density
of events within the Orange network. See Figure 3 for the density of events within the
Orange network for three representative time periods. In Figure 4, we compare it to
the implied presence data within the ZTM estimate: with each data point represents
one zone and the two axes correspond to the presence implied by ZTM for the morning
peak and the numbers of events within Orange network during the same time period,
averaged over the 5 work days. As can be seen, our model starts with rather different
data, and any direct comparison of our estimates of trip distributions with the estimates
of the public transport operator (ZTM) will hence be imperfect.
For further comparison, we have implemented the doubly-constrained gravity model [9].
There, the presence vectors E` across two consecutive time steps are seen as production
and attraction vectors within the framework of a travel-demand model, which aims to
generate trip distribution rates. An appropriate normalization can give yield matrix X
similar:
Ai B j Ei1 E j2
xi j =
,
(12)
cαi j
12
Figure 2: The evolution of some statistics of the active (left) and passive (right) events
observed. The statistics are computed over all BTSs and all 5 available days (Monday –
Friday), e.g. the mean at 9:00 is the mean of the number of events at all BTSs on all 5
days at 9am. The inner (dark blue) band is the interquartile range, whereas the outer
(light blue) band extends between the 5th percentile and the maximum event count at
that time.
(a) 6 a. m.
(b) 9:30 a. m.
(c) 4:30 p. m.
Figure 3: Density of events across zones for different time periods. Color scale uses a
power law normalization.
where Ai and B j are zone-specific parameters for the origin and destination, respectively,
which are learned from the data, and α is a parameter, which we assume to be α = 1.0.
An iterative algorithm [9] can then be used to determine the flow, subject to flow
conservation constraints.
To test the approaches, data were aggregated spatially to 820 zones defined by the public
13
Figure 4: Presence by zone implied by the estimates of ZTM and the density of events
in the Orange network.
transport operator (ZTM), and temporally to 15-minute units, prior to the application of
any methods described in the present paper. Independently, for each cost function, an
820 × 820 matrix has been calculated, based on a description of each zone as a polygon
with points defined by their latitude and longitude. Additionally, we have obtained
randomised variants of the objective function by adding uniformly-distributed noise
U[0, 0.0001) to each element, e.g., Ca (Zi , Z j ) for all i, j. (Note that the introduction of a
small amount of noise makes it possible to obtain multiple optimizers with very similar
objective function value.) The data have been normalised to the number N = 1, 000, 000
of users, i.e., such that the marginals, and hence the 672, 400 scalar variables sum up to
1, 000, 000. Subsequently, the linear program (LP-C) of Section 3.3 with 672, 400 scalar
variables and 1, 640 dense constraints has been formulated and solved for each pair of
consecutive time steps between 8 a. m. and 9.30 a. m. on each of the five work days
and each of 4 randomisation of the objective function. The sparse, integral solutions
of all linear programs have been averaged to reduce the sparsity in our estimate of the
1-step transition matrix S1 . Subsequently, we have obtained i-step transition matrices for
i = 3, 4, . . . 7, i.e., corresponding to trips of 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes of duration,
by the matrix-multiplication procedure of Section 4.1. Finally, we have computed a
convex combination of the i-step transition matrices as suggested in Section 4.4, using
weights detailed in the caption of Figure 5.
Notice that we did not have an accurate estimate of the trip-duration distribution, which
Figure 5 suggests has a considerable impact. Still, the match seems encouraging,
considering the simplicity of the methods applied: we have considered the simplest cost
function Ca , we have assumed the constant number N of users throughout in (LP-C),
and the crudest method of arriving at the multi-step transition matrices.
14
(a) 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6
(b) 0.5, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1, 0.1
(c) 1 − 5ε, ε, ε, ε, ε, ε
(d) Gravity model
Figure 5: Solutions to Problem 4 obtained using (LP-C) and three variants of the vector
h1 , h2 , h3 , h4 , h5 , h6 , compared against the estimates of the public transport operator
(ZTM).
7
7.1
Related Work
The Demand Modelling
There is a long history of the use of individual mobile phone subscriber data in transportation modelling. Outside of Europe, the most common study is based on CDR (Call
Data Record). For example in [4], the CDR are used to analyse flows between the city
and the suburban area of New York. In [19], researchers analyse the CDR from the
main mobile operator in Mexico, and one of the papers focuses on users movements
analysis. In [37], CDR data including phone calls, SMS messages, and web browsing
15
of customers of one US mobile operator in the San Francisco Bay area are used to
determine patterns of urban road use. The Orange company organized two editions of
the D4D Challenge (http://www.d4d.orange.com/en/Accueil), during which the
anonymous CDR of Abidjan in Cote d’Ivoire data was made available to developers and
researchers. Some of the present authors [23, 28] used the data set to optimize public
transport. In a related paper [11], the data from the competition is used to estimate
the travel demand and network allocation. The access to the CDR data is particularly
limited in Europe, though, where privacy-protection regulation make access to the CDR
data impossible without their anonymization and user’s consent, in most cases.
Within Europe, [2] discusses the use of GPS data, CDR, and cellular data (details of
base stations) to determine the trajectory of subscriber mobility. The data for this study
was collected by a group of volunteer users in cooperation with one of the French
operators, and the study covers the metropolitan area of Paris (Ile-de-France). The
use of anonymous mobile data and their use for locating subscribers anonymously is
described in [13]. [35] discusses the use of data from Italy’s Vodafone users to compute
mobility patterns in Italian cities. In this case, the real-time events (due to voice, data,
and SMS communication) observed between A Interface and IU-CS interface in 2G
and 3G mobile networks have been used. In [31], the authors describe the usage of
aggregated mobile phone data from Rome, including the information about the base
station telephone traffic, expressed in Erlang units. These records are combined with
the location and trajectory data of callers and data from the two city transportation
companies (taxi and public bus company). [24] describe the aggregation procedure used
to derive the dataset we use.
7.2
The Algorithms
Notice that the linear program (LP-C) has a well-known structure, in that the feasible
set is the transportation polytope:
Definition 7 (Transportation Polytope). Given γ ∈ R p , η ∈ Rq , the set of matrices
X ∈ R p×q , Xi j ≥ 0 satisfying
p
∑i=1 Xi j = η j
q
∑ j=1 Xi j = γi
∀ j = 1, . . . , q
∀i = 1, . . . , p
(13)
is called the (p, q)-transportation polytope defined by the marginals γ and η.
Related algorithms for solving special-cases of linear programming are employed
throughout pattern recognition and content-based content retrieval. The commonly used
statistical distances include the Earth mover’s distance (EMD) [32], also known as the
transportation cost metric [16], and Mallows distance [25], which are equivalent [20],
in the sense of being dual of each other. These are discretisations of the metrics of
Wasserstein and Monge-Kantorovich [8], which are also dual of each other. Computing
the distances amounts to solving a certain problem over the so-called transportation
polytope. Perhaps the best overview is provided by the two-volume work of Rachev and
Rüschendorf [29, 30].
16
In Computer Vision [27, 34, 12], a variety of exact and approximate methods have been
considered. Perhaps the best known exact method [27] uses the min-cost flow algorithm,
yielding run-time of O(n2 log n) for n bins. Approximations based on gradient flows
of certain partial differential equations [12] can be computed faster than earth mover’s
distance, empirically, but do not come with any guarantees, i.e., the approximation ratio.
Approximations based on the sum of absolute values of weighted wavelet coefficients of
the difference of the histograms [34] have been proposed. Such an approximation can
be computed in time linear in the number of bins, but does not come with a bound on its
quality, i.e., the approximation ratio. Papers on approximations based on space-filling
curves [14] have been withdrawn, recently.
In Machine Learning [6], Sinkhorn distances, which are a regularised variant of the
Earth mover’s distance, have been explored. Although the algorithms based on the
Sinkhorn distance are substantially faster than the network simplex for Earth mover’s
distance, It has also been realised [22] that one can employ the following representation
with O(n) variables for n bins: leading to run-time cubic in the number of bins.
In Theoretical Computer Science, [16] have studied the limits of approximability of
earth mover’s distance, [1] have proposed logarithmic approximation in sub-linear time,
while [3, 5] proposed algorithms approximation algorithms, whose run-time depends
on the dimension of the domain space and the quality of the result required, possibly
sub-linear in the number of bins. A similar in spirit is a recent method [21], which
considers dithering of the domain space, followed by max-flow computations [27]. We
stress that our algorithms are much easier to implement and provide the exact solution.
Overall, the present-best algorithms [27] had run-time of O(n2 log n) for n bins, compared to O(n) we present in Theorem 6. Across all the references listed, only the value
of the objective function, rather than the value of the argument at which it is achieved,
is sought.
8
Conclusions
Across many transport-engineering applications, from planning of public transport to
balancing of a fleet of shared vehicles, one needs an up-to-date model of demand for
transportation. Further, one may be interested in higher moments of the demand, rather
than just the commonly-used expectation. The use of mobile phone data makes it
possible to address both issues.
For the first time, we have formalised the problem of extraction of a model of demand
for transport from the aggregate data on the use of the base stations. We have shown
that the associated optimisation problems have the form of a trace maximisation over
the transportation polytope, which allows for much faster algorithms than the usual
simplex or interior point methods. In particular, we show that there exist closed-form
expressions for the values of the objective functions of trace maximisation over the
transportation polytope. This allows for the computation of the objective function in
time linear in the dimension of the input, in theory, and many orders of magnitude faster
17
than solvers in the published literature, in practice. Numerous extensions are possible,
aiming to infer mode choice, to study the variability of the demand over time, as well as
to improve the calibration techniques. We envision this may open up a new direction of
research on the interface of statistics and transportation engineering.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Marco Cuturi for having kindly provided us with his code for
the comparison reported in Section 6. We would also like to thank Yossi Rubner et al.
[32] and Ofir Pele and Michael Werman [27] for releasing their code on-line (http://
robotics.stanford.edu/~rubner/emd/default.htm, http://www.cs.huji.ac.
il/~ofirpele/FastEMD/code/). This work received funding from the European
Union Horizon 2020 Programme (Horizon2020/2014-2020), under grant agreement no.
688380.
References
[1] Alexandr Andoni, Piotr Indyk, and Robert Krauthgamer. Earth mover distance over
high-dimensional spaces. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual ACM-SIAM
Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’08, pages 343–352, 2008.
[2] Fereshteh Asgari, Alexis Sultan, Haoyi Xiong, Vincent Gauthier, and Mounîm A.
El-Yacoubi. Ct-mapper: Mapping sparse multimodal cellular trajectories using a
multilayer transportation network. Computer Communications, 95:69 – 81, 2016.
Mobile Traffic Analytics.
[3] Khanh Do Ba, Huy L. Nguyen, Huy N. Nguyen, and Ronitt Rubinfeld. Sublinear time algorithms for earth mover’s distance. Theory of Computing Systems,
48(2):428–442, 2010.
[4] R. A. Becker, R. Caceres, K. Hanson, J. M. Loh, S. Urbanek, A. Varshavsky, and
C. Volinsky. A tale of one city: Using cellular network data for urban planning.
IEEE Pervasive Computing, 10(4):18–26, April 2011.
[5] Siu-On Chan, Ilias Diakonikolas, Gregory Valiant, and Paul Valiant. Optimal
algorithms for testing closeness of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the
Twenty-Fifth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA ’14,
pages 1193–1203. SIAM, 2014.
[6] Marco Cuturi. Sinkhorn distances: Lightspeed computation of optimal transport.
In C. J. C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Q. Weinberger,
editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26, pages 2292–2300.
Curran Associates, Inc., 2013.
18
[7] Jesús A De Loera and Edward D Kim. Combinatorics and geometry of transportation polytopes: an update. Discrete Geometry and Algebraic Combinatorics,
625:37–76, 2014.
[8] Yuxin Deng and Wenjie Du. The Kantorovich metric in computer science: A
brief survey. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 253(3):73–82,
2009. Proceedings of Seventh Workshop on Quantitative Aspects of Programming
Languages (QAPL 2009).
[9] Sven Erlander and Neil F Stewart. The gravity model in transportation analysis:
theory and extensions, volume 3. Vsp, 1990.
[10] Jacek Gondzio. Interior point methods 25 years later. European Journal of
Operational Research, 218(3):587–601, 2012.
[11] David Gundlegård, Clas Rydergren, Nils Breyer, and Botond Rajna. Travel demand
estimation and network assignment based on cellular network data. Computer
Communications, 95:29 – 42, 2016. Mobile Traffic Analytics.
[12] Steven Haker, Lei Zhu, Allen Tannenbaum, and Sigurd Angenent. Optimal mass
transport for registration and warping. International Journal of Computer Vision,
60(3):225–240.
[13] S. Hoteit, S. Secci, S. Sobolevsky, G. Pujolle, and C. Ratti. Estimating real
human trajectories through mobile phone data. In 2013 IEEE 14th International
Conference on Mobile Data Management, volume 2, pages 148–153, June 2013.
[14] Min-Hee Jang, Sang-Wook Kim, Christos Faloutsos, and Sunju Park. A linear-time
approximation of the earth mover’s distance. CoRR, abs/1106.1521, 2011.
[15] Roy Jonker and Anton Volgenant. A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense
and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing, 38(4):325–340, 1987.
[16] Subhash Khot and Assaf Naor. Nonembeddability theorems via Fourier analysis.
Mathematische Annalen, 334(4):821–852, 4 2006.
[17] Harold W Kuhn. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval
research logistics quarterly, 2(1-2):83–97, 1955.
[18] François Le Gall. Powers of tensors and fast matrix multiplication. In Proceedings
of the 39th international symposium on symbolic and algebraic computation, pages
296–303. ACM, 2014.
[19] Yannick Leo, Anthony Busson, Carlos Sarraute, and Eric Fleury. Call detail
records to characterize usages and mobility events of phone users. Computer
Communications, 95:43 – 53, 2016. Mobile Traffic Analytics.
[20] E. Levina and P. Bickel. The earth mover’s distance is the mallows distance:
some insights from statistics. In Computer Vision, 2001. ICCV 2001. Proceedings.
Eighth IEEE International Conference on, volume 2, pages 251–256 vol.2, 2001.
19
[21] Longjie Li, Min Ma, Peng Lei, Xiaoping Wang, and Xiaoyun Chen. A linear
approximate algorithm for earth mover’s distance with thresholded ground distance.
Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 2014.
[22] H. Ling and K. Okada. An efficient earth mover’s distance algorithm for robust
histogram comparison. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine
Intelligence, 29(5):840–853, May 2007.
[23] G. Di Lorenzo, M. Sbodio, F. Calabrese, M. Berlingerio, F. Pinelli, and R. Nair. Allaboard: Visual exploration of cellphone mobility data to optimise public transport.
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(2):1036–1050,
Feb 2016.
[24] Marcin Luckner, Aneta Rosłan, Izabela Krzemińska, Jarosław Legierski, and
Robert Kunicki. Clustering of Mobile Subscriber’s Location Statistics for Travel
Demand Zones Diversity, pages 315–326. Springer International Publishing, Cham,
2017.
[25] C. L. Mallows. A note on asymptotic joint normality. Ann. Math. Statist.,
43(2):508–515, 04 1972.
[26] Rasmus Pagh. Compressed matrix multiplication. ACM Trans. Comput. Theory,
5(3):9:1–9:17, August 2013.
[27] O. Pele and M. Werman. Fast and robust earth mover’s distances. In 2009 IEEE
12th International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 460–467, Sept 2009.
[28] F. Pinelli, R. Nair, F. Calabrese, M. Berlingerio, G. Di Lorenzo, and M. L. Sbodio. Data-driven transit network design from mobile phone trajectories. IEEE
Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(6):1724–1733, June 2016.
[29] S.T. Rachev and L. Rüschendorf. Mass Transportation Problems: Volume I:
Theory. Probability and its Applications. Springer, 1998.
[30] S.T. Rachev and L. Rüschendorf. Mass Transportation Problems: Volume II:
Applications. Probability and its Applications. Springer, 1998.
[31] J. Reades, F. Calabrese, A. Sevtsuk, and C. Ratti. Cellular census: Explorations in
urban data collection. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(3):30–38, July 2007.
[32] Yossi Rubner, Carlo Tomasi, and Leonidas J Guibas. The earth mover’s distance
as a metric for image retrieval. International journal of computer vision, 40(2):99–
121, 2000.
[33] A. Schrijver. Combinatorial Optimization: Polyhedra and Efficiency. Algorithms
and Combinatorics. Springer, 2002.
[34] S. Shirdhonkar and D. W. Jacobs. Approximate earth mover’s distance in linear
time. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE
Conference on, pages 1–8, June 2008.
[35] D. Tosi and S. Marzorati. Big data from cellular networks: Real mobility scenarios
for future smart cities. In 2016 IEEE Second International Conference on Big Data
20
Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService), pages 131–141, March
2016.
[36] Fahui Wang and Yanqing Xu. Estimating O–D travel time matrix by Google Maps
API: implementation, advantages, and implications. Annals of GIS, 17(4):199–209,
2011.
[37] Pu Wang, Timothy Hunter, Alexandre M Bayen, Katja Schechtner, and Marta C
González. Understanding Road Usage Patterns in Urban Areas. Scientific Reports,
2(arXiv:1212.5327):1001. 47 p, Dec 2012.
21
A
Proof of Theorem (6)
Let us present the proof of
Theorem. Given η, γ ∈ Zn+ , with 1T η = 1T γ = k, consider
z := max tr(X) s.t. X 1 = γ, X T 1 = η.
(IP2)
X∈Zn×n
+
Then, z = ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi . This is computable in time linear in n.
Proof. The proof proceeds in two steps. First, we prove that y ≤ ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi for
any feasible X. Second, we construct a feasible X achieving this upper bound.
Step 1: Since Xi j ≥ 0, we certainly have Xi j ≤ ∑n`=1 X` j = η j and Xi j ≤ ∑n`=1 Xi` = γi .
Hence in particular Xii ≤ ηi and Xii ≤ γi , and so by choosing the tightest bound at each
i, y = ∑ni=1 Xii ≤ ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi follows.
Step 2: Before we proceed with Step 2 proper, we make two assumptions and explain
that these are without any loss of generality.
Assumption 1: η 6= γ. Notice that if η = γ, one lets Xii = ηi = γi for i = 1, . . . , n and
Xi j = 0 for all off-diagonalelements Such an X trivially satisfies all constraints and
tr(X) = ∑ni=1 ηi = ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi = k, and hence the result holds for this case. We
can hence assume η 6= γ without the loss of generality.
Assumption 2:The marginals are ordered such that:
ηi ≤ γi
for i = 1, . . . , m
ηi > γi
for i = m + 1, . . . , n.
If that is not the case, then let P denote the permutation matrix so that Pη and Pγ
are ordered.1 Then, if X̄ is feasible for (IP2) with the modified marginals Pη and
Pγ, then X = PX̄P is feasible for (IP2) and achieves the identical objective, since
tr(PX̄P) = tr(PPX̄) = tr(X̄).
Note that we certainly have 1 ≤ m ≤ n − 1, because m = 0 implies ηi > γi for all i,
which in turn implies ∑ni=1 ηi > ∑ni=1 γi , which contradicts ∑ni=1 ηi = k = ∑ni=1 γi , hence
m ≥ 1; m = n together with Assumption 1 (η 6= γ) leads to an analogous contradiction.
The construction of Step 2 fixes all values on the diagonal of X, the first m columns and
the last n − m rows:
Xii = ηi ,
Xi j = 0
for j = 1, . . . , m,
Xii = γi ,
Xi j = 0
for i = m + 1, . . . , n,
i 6= j
j 6= i.
e := η − min{η, γ}, γe := γ − min{η, γ},
Denote the remainders of the marginals by η
where the min{·} is taken element-wise.
1 P can be constructed easily: let C := {i | η ≤ γ }. Then m = card(C ) and we obtain P by rearranging
i
i
the identity matrix In so that the columns with indices in C are the first m columns, in any order.
22
γf
=
η1
γ1 − η1
η2
γ2 − η2
Y
=: γe 0
ηm
γm − ηm
γm+1
0
γn
ηfT =
0
0
0
ηm+1
−γm+1
0
ηn − γn
=: ηe 0
Figure 6: Illustration of the proof of Theorem 6: After possibly reordering the marginals,
the diagonals are filled in, and the hatched regions are filled with zeros. The elements
in the rectangular block Y are then used to satisfy the remaining constraints, which are
e 0.
collected in γe0 and η
Let us now consider several properties of this construction; see also Figure 6 for an
illustration:
P1 tr X = ∑ni=1 min ηi , γi , which matches the bound of Step 1.
P2 ∑ni=1 Xi j = η j for j = 1, . . . , m and ∑nj=1 Xi j = γi for i = m + 1, . . . , n, i.e., all
constraints but the m first row sums and last n − m column sums are already
satisfied.
P3 Only Xi j for i = 1, . . . , m and j = m + 1, . . . , n are unassigned. Denote this m ×
(n − m) matrix by Y .
e = 1T γe =: e
e , γe ≥ 0, and η
ei = γej = 0 for i = 1, . . . , m and j = m + 1, . . . , n.
P4 1T η
k, η
e and γe by η
e 0 and γe0 respectively, i.e. η
e 0 ∈ Zn−m
Denote the remaining elements of η
+
23
and γe0 ∈ Zm
+ and
0
e= 0 ,
η
e
η
0
γe
γe =
.
0
e 0 = 1Tm γe0 = e
k, since we only removed zero elements.
We still have 1Tn−m η
m×(n−m)
By property P1 and P3, if we are able to find a matrix Y ∈ Z+
satisfying Y 1n−m =
e 0 , we can recover a feasible X that achieves the bound of Step 1. By
γe0 , and Y T 1m = η
P3 and P4, this amounts to finding a point in the (m, n − m) transportation polytope
e 0 . Since by P4 we have that 1Tn−m η
e 0 = 1Tm γe0 , it follows
defined by the marginals γe0 and η
from Lemma 5 that such a Y does exist, which concludes Step 2.
24
| 8cs.DS
|
Interface Reconciliation in Kahn Process
Networks using CSP and SAT
arXiv:1503.00622v4 [cs.PL] 12 Jul 2015
Pavel Zaichenkov, Olga Tveretina, Alex Shafarenko
Compiler Technology and Computer Architecture Group,
University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
{p.zaichenkov,o.tveretina,a.shafarenko}@ctca.eu
Abstract. We present a new CSP- and SAT-based approach for coordinating interfaces of distributed stream-connected components provided
as closed-source services. The Kahn Process Network (KPN) is taken
as a formal model of computation and a Message Definition Language
(MDL) is introduced to describe the format of messages communicated
between the processes. MDL links input and output interfaces of a node
to support flow inheritance and contextualisation. Since interfaces can
also be linked by the existence of a data channel between them, the match
is generally not only partial but also substantially nonlocal. The KPN
communication graph thus becomes a graph of interlocked constraints
to be satisfied by specific instances of the variables. We present an algorithm that solves the CSP by iterative approximation while generating
an adjunct Boolean SAT problem on the way. We developed a solver in
OCaml as well as tools that analyse the source code of KPN vertices to
derive MDL terms and automatically modify the code by propagating
type definitions back to the vertices after the CSP has been solved. Techniques and approaches are illustrated on a KPN implementing an image
processing algorithm as a running example.
Keywords: coordination programming, component programming, Kahn Process Networks, interface coordination, constraint satisfaction, satisfiability
1
Introduction
The software intensive systems have reached unprecedented scale by every measure: number of lines of code; number of people involved in the development;
number of dependencies between software components, and amount of data
stored and manipulated [1]. Many of them include heterogeneous elements, which
come from variety of different sources: parts of them are written in different languages and tuned for different hardware/software platforms. Furthermore, when
the software is developed and modified by dispersed teams, inconsistencies in
the design, implementation and usage are unavoidable. This leads to clashes of
assumptions about operation cost, resource availability and algorithm processing
rate. Last but not least, parts of the system are constantly changing. Many elements need to be replaced without negative effects on performance or behaviour
of the rest of the system.
One way to attack the software challenge is to suggest a component-based
design: a program is designed as a set of components, each represented by an
interface that specifies how they can be used in an application, and one or more
implementations which define their actual behaviour. When a designer of the
application uses a component, they agree to rely only on the interface specification. Similarly, a developer who creates an implementation for a component is
unaware of the context where the component will be used. An algorithm that
specifies the behaviour depends solely on self-contained input and its result is
produced in the form of a message without a specific destination address.
The process network, introduced by G. Kahn (KPNs) [2], is a collection
of stream-connected algorithmic building blocks, which are fully independent
single-threaded processes that lack a global state. The execution of the network generally requires a supervisory coordination program that manages the
progress of the blocks and which provides a message-communication infrastructure for the streams. Since all domain-specific computations are performed by
the sequential processes inside the blocks, programming is naturally separated
into algorithm and concurrency engineering [3]. The coordination language is
responsible for component orchestration, namely 1) dynamic load control and
adaptivity for a changing environment; 2) access control to shared resources; and
3) communication safety between components. This paper focuses on the last aspect. Component-based design requires an implementation of a single component
to be independent from the rest of the network. It raises a number of software
engineering issues: components’ interfaces are required to be specific enough so
that components are aware of data structures communicated between them and,
at the same time, generic enough to facilitate decontextualisation and software
reuse.
In this paper we present a solution to the interface reconciliation problem
for an interface definition language specifically designed for KPNs. We demonstrate a static mechanism (based on solving Constraint Satisfaction Problem
(CSP) and SAT) that checks compatibility of component interfaces connected in
a network with support of overloading and structural subtyping. This allows one
to design completely decontextualised components, so that they may be reused
in different contexts without changing the code. This is especially important
when the components are provided as a compiled library and its source is either private or unavailable. The components are compatible with a potentially
unlimited number of input/output data formats coming from the environment.
We also introduce a flow inheritance [4] mechanism: put simply, a message sent
from one component to another may also be required to contain additional data
which, although not needed by the recipient itself, is nevertheless required by a
component that the recipient sends its own messages to (Fig. 1).
We propose a Message Definition Language (MDL) that enables components’
generic interfaces as well as subtyping and flow inheritance; we then recast the
interface reconciliation problem as a CSP for the interface variables and propose
an original solution algorithm that solves it by iterative approximation while
generating an adjunct Boolean SAT problem on the way.
We designed and implemented a communication protocol1 for components
coded in C++ to demonstrate the capabilities of MDL. We developed tools that
1) automatically derive MDL interfaces from the source code; 2) generate a set of
constraints given a netlist2 that describes the topology of the network; 3) solve
the CSP; and 4) based on the solution of the CSP generate compilable code for
every component with some API provided for run-time support.
The process is similar to template specialisation in C++, however, in our case,
constraints that are produced by a pair of vertices may affect the whole network,
and, consequently, a global constraint satisfaction procedure is required. In this
paper we provide a formal description of MDL, the CSP definition and the
algorithm designed to solve the CSP.
Throughout the paper we demonstrate the utility of the proposed approach
on a practical example: an image segmentation algorithm based on k-means
clustering (Fig. 2).
Related work. Linda [5] is the first language designed to separate computation and coordination models. It is based on a simple tuplespace model. One
of the disadvantages of the model is that the knowledge about the communication protocol is required while implementing the processes. The problem of
separation of concerns has not been solved in Concurrent Collections from Intel [6] (Linda’s successor). Therefore, generic components, which may be reused
in multiple contexts without being modified, are not supported in the language.
In the programming language Reo [7] components are communicating through
hierarchical connectors that coordinate their activities and manipulate message
dataflow. Similar to our approach, a constraint satisfaction engine, which finds a
solution that specifies a valid interaction between components, is implemented.
S. Kemper describes a SAT-based verification of Timed Constraint Automata
that is used for coordination of communicating components [8] as well as in
Reo. However, the research mostly focuses on the design of reusable interaction
protocols and lacks the description of reusable component interfaces.
In previous years there were attempts to design efficient programming languages and run-time systems for parallel programming based on KPN [4,9], however, the interface reconciliation problem stemming from nonlocal inheritance in
KPNs has not been given enough attention.
2
Motivation
Kahn Process Networks is a concurrency model that introduces data streams
in the form of sequential channels that connect independent processes into a
network. Decontextualisation of processes is an advantage of the model. Since
processes do not share any data, a process’s conformity with the context is
defined by its interface, which describes the kinds of message that the process
1
2
for the avoidance of doubt we state that the term “protocol” is used here in the
sense of ‘convention governing the structure and interpretation of messages’ and not
in any state-transition sense
a textual representation of a graph
A
B
Fig. 1: Illustration of flow inheritance. A component A can process a value of type
X and return a value of type Y as a result. However, an input message contains
not only an element of type X, but also an element of type Z. The latter can be
processed by a component B. Flow inheritance provides a mechanism for partial
message processing in a pipelined fashion.
can send and receive. Our goal is to provide a means of interface coordination
that supports genericity, i.e. the ability of an interface to function correctly in a
variety of contexts.
The distributed components are commonly provided as closed-source services. Each service contains multiple processing functions compatible with a
variety of contexts. The input interface of a component is specialised based on
the message format that the message producer is capable to produce, and, symmetrically, the output interface is specialised based on the consumer’s requirements. For example, one can define a component that contains two functions
with type signatures Int -> Int and Int -> String. The functions implement
algorithms that compute different values given the same input. The task is to
statically choose the algorithm based the consumer’s requirements. This also
demonstrates that input and output types in the interfaces of the KPN components are treated in the same manner.
The latter makes services fundamentally different from functions. In functional languages, a type signature that corresponds to the interface of the component in the example can be defined by the intersection type Int -> Int ∧
Int -> String, which is unsound due to its ambiguity. In functional languages,
the return type of a function depends solely on input argument types. In contrast, the interfaces of the KPN components form context-dependent relations
that offer a selection of output types to a consumer. This makes the typing
decisions essentially nonlocal and genuinely multiple.
The problem being solved can be seen as a type inference problem; however,
it cannot be solved using conventional type inference mechanisms based on firstorder unification due to the presence of polymorphic output types and potential
cyclic dependencies in the network (the example in Fig. 2 contains a back edge).
A common communication pattern in streaming networks is a pipeline, where
a message travels along a chain of components that work on its content. The
component can accept a subtype of the input type, but part of the message may
be bypassed to another component down the pipeline if the message contains
the data the further component will need to use (Fig. 1). Two modes of flow
inheritance are envisaged, considered next.
Flow inheritance for records. The fundamental type of a message in a
variety of systems is record, which is a collection of label-value pairs. Each component processes only a specific set of pairs, however the pairs that the component
does not require may be bypassed to the output, so they can be processed in the
read
1
init
1
2
1
kMeans
1
2
1
1
2
3
segmented
image
logs/errors
Fig. 2: An image segmentation algorithm based on k-means clustering that is
implemented as a Kahn Process Network
next stages of the pipeline if they are required. For example, a message that represents a geometric shape and has a type {x:float, y:float, radius:float}
may be processed in two steps: the first component processes the position of the
shape as defined by the pairs x and y, and the second one needs the pair labelled
radius.
Flow inheritance for variants. OOP extensively uses overloading [10] to
improve modularity and reusability of code. Similarly, support of polymorphic
components in KPNs facilitates their reuse in different contexts. At the top level
we see a component’s interface as a collection of alternative label- record pairs,
called variants, where the label corresponds to the particular implementation
that can process the message defined by the given record, e.g.
(: cart: {x:float, y:float}, polar: {r:float, phi:float} :).
Here the colonised parentheses delimit the collection of variants and each variant
is associated with a record written as a set of label-value pairs. Any message that
does not belong to one of the accepted variants must cause an error unless there
exists another component further down in the pipeline that can process it. In
this case, the message should be bypassed to the recipient.
In streaming networks flow inheritance alleviates the problem and makes
configuration of individual interfaces independent from each other. In our work
we developed a solution for the interface reconciliation based on the CSP with
support of flow inheritance for records and variants. Our mechanism statically
detects implementation variants in components that are not required in the
context, which is important for applications running in the Cloud where a user
is charged proportionally to the amount of resources their application uses.
Example. As a running example we use our implementation [11] of an image
segmentation algorithm based on k-means clustering [12]. The applications’s
KPN graph is shown in Fig. 2. The network represents a pipeline composed of
three components:
– The component read opens an image file using an input message Mr1 with
the file name, and sends it to the first output channel. The component contains 3 functions that overload component’s behaviour (i.e. the input interface of the component is defined by 3 variants): 1) Vr1 loads the colour image
in RGB format; 2) Vr2 loads the greyscale image as an intensity one; and
3) Vr3 loads the image as it is stored in the file.
– The component init sets initial parameters for the k-means algorithm. The
component contains one processing function Vi1 . The input message can
either come from the component read or from the environment with an
input message Mi1 if it has been opened and preprocessed before. The input
message must contain the number of clusters K and the image itself.
– The kMeans component represents an iterative implementation (defined as a
function Vk1 ) of the k-means algorithm. The result of each iteration is sent
to the first output channel, which is circuited back to the input channel of
the component itself. This kind of design gives an opportunity to manage
system load in the run-time and execute the next iteration only when sufficient resources are available. Once the cluster centres have converged, the
algorithm yields the result to the second output channel.
Using flow inheritance for variants Mi1 is routed directly to the init component bypassing a component read. Using flow inheritance for records a parameter
K that is contained in Mr1 is implicitly bypassed through read to init.
The interface reconciliation algorithm is capable of finding out that Vr2 and
Vr3 are not used with the provided input, and functions containing the implementations will be excluded from the generated code.
3
Message Definition Language
Now we define the Message Definition Language (MDL) that describes component interfaces. Each component has its associated input and output interface
terms. A message is a collection of data entities, defined by a corresponding collection of terms that can contain term variables, Boolean variables and Boolean
expressions.
Each term is either atomic or a collection in its own right. Atomic terms are
symbols, which are identifiers used to represent standard C++ types, such as int
or string. To account for subtyping (including the kinds that are not present in
C++) we include three categories of collections (see Fig. 3): tuples that demand
exact match and thus admit no structural subtyping, records that are subtyped
covariantly (a larger record is a subtype) and choices that are contravariantly
subtyped using set inclusion (a smaller choice is a subtype). The intention of
these terms is to represent
1. extensible data records [13,14], where additional named fields can be introduced without breaking the match between the producer and the consumer
and where fields can also be inherited from input to output records by lowering the output type, which is always safe;
2. data-record variants, where generally more variants can be accepted by the
consumer than the producer is aware of, and where such additional variants
can be inherited from the output back to the input of the producer — hence
contravariance — again by raising the input type, which is always safe also.
Term variables correspond to four categories of terms. However, for the correctness of the algorithm it is important to distinguish variables that represent
choices from variables that represent other term categories (due to two kinds of
subtyping defined by the seniority relation in Definition 1). We use an up-coerced
term variable, e.g. ↑a, to represent a choice term and a down-coerced term variable, e.g. ↓a, to represent any other term, i.e. a symbol, a tuple or a record.
Formally,
hterm variablei ::= ↑identifier | ↓identifier
We use symbol 8 instead of ↑ or ↓ symbols in the context where the sort is
unimportant, e.g. 8a is a term variable that can be either up-coerced or downcoerced.
For brevity, term variables are called variables, Boolean variables are called
flags and Boolean expressions are called guards. The following grammar specifies
the guards:
hbool i ::= (hbool i ∧ hbool i) | (hbool i ∨ hbool i) | ¬hbool i | true | false | flag
MDL terms are built recursively using the constructors: tuple, record, choice
and switch, according to the following grammar:
htermi ::= hsymbol i | hterm variablei | htuplei | hrecord i | hchoicei | hswitchi
htuplei ::= (htermi [htermi]∗ )
hrecord i ::= {[hlabel i(hbool i):htermi[,hlabel i(hbool i):htermi]∗ [|↓identifier ]]}
hchoicei ::= (:[hlabel i(hbool i):htermi[,hlabel i(hbool i):htermi]∗ [|↑identifier ]]:)
hlabel i ::= hsymbol i
Informally, a tuple is an ordered collection of terms and a record is an extensible, unordered collection of guarded labeled terms, where labels are arbitrary
symbols, which are unique within a single record. A choice is a collection of
alternative terms. The syntax of choice is the same as that of record except for
the delimiters. The difference between records and choices is in subtyping and
will become clear below when we define seniority on terms. We use choices to
represent polymorphic messages and component interfaces.
Records and choices are defined in tail form. The tail is denoted by a variable
that represents a term of the same kind as the construct in which it occurs. For
example, in the term {l1 (true): t1 , . . . , ln (true): tn |↓v} the variable ↓v represents
the tail of the record, i.e. its members with labels li : li 6= l1 , . . . li 6= ln . A switch
is a set of unlabeled (by contrast to a choice) guarded alternatives.
hswitchi ::= <hbool i:htermi[, hbool i:htermi]∗ >
Exactly one guard must be true for any valid switch. The switch is substitutionally equivalent to the term marked by the true guard:
hfalse: t1 , . . . , true: ti , . . . , false: tn i = htrue: ti i = ti .
The switch is an auxiliary construct intended for building conditional terms.
For example, ha: int, ¬a: stringi represents the symbol int if a = true, and the
symbol string otherwise.
For each term t, we use V ↑ (t) to denote the set of up-coerced term variables
that occur in t, V ↓ (t) to denote the set of the down-coerced ones, and F (t) to
denote the set of flags.
A term t is called semi-ground if it does not contain variables, i.e. V ↑ (t) ∪
↓
V (t) = ∅. A term t is called ground if it is semi-ground and does not contain
flags, i.e. V ↑ (t) ∪ V ↓ (t) ∪ F (t) = ∅.
A term t is well-formed if it is ground and one of the following holds:
1. t is a symbol.
2. n > 0 and t is a tuple (t1 . . . tn ) where all ti , 0 < i ≤ n, are well-formed.
3. n ≥ 0 and t is a record {l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn } where for all 0 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n,
bi ∧ bj → li 6= lj and all ti for which bi are true are well-formed.
4. n ≥ 0 and t is a choice (:l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn :) where for all 0 ≤ i 6= j ≤ n,
bi ∧ bj → li 6= lj and all ti for which bi are true are well-formed.
5. n > 0 and t is a switch hb1 : t1 , . . . , bn : tn i where for some 1 ≤ i ≤ n, bi = true
and ti is well-formed and where bj = false for all j 6= i.
If an element of a record, choice or switch has a guard that is equal to false,
then the element can be omitted, e.g.
{l1 (b1 ): t1 , l2 (false): t2 , l3 (bn ): t3 } = {l1 (b1 ): t1 , l3 (b3 ): t3 } .
If an element of a record or a choice has a guard that is true, the guard can be
syntactically omitted, e.g.
{l1 (b1 ): t1 , l2 (true): t2 , l3 (bn ): t3 } = {l1 (b1 ): t1 , l2 : t2 , l3 (bn ): t3 } .
We define the canonical form of a well-formed collection as a representation that
does not include false guards, and we omit true guards anyway. The canonical
form of a switch is its (only) term with a true guard, hence any term in canonical
form is switch-free.
Next we introduce a seniority relation on terms for the purpose of structural
subtyping. In the sequel we use nil to denote the empty record { }, which has
the meaning of void type in C++ and represents a message without any data.
Similarly, we use none to denote the empty choice (: :).
Definition 1 (Seniority relation). The seniority relation ⊑ on well-formed
terms is defined in canonical form as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
none ⊑ t if t is a choice.
t ⊑ nil if t is any term but a choice.
t ⊑ t.
t1 ⊑ t2 , if for some k, m > 0 one of the following holds:
i
i
each 1 ≤ i ≤ k;
(a) t1 = t11 . . . tk1 , t2 = t12 . . . tk2 and
1 t11⊑ t2 for
k
1 1
k
(b) t1 = l1 : t1 , . . . , l1 : t1 and t2 = l2 : t2 , . . . , l2m : tm
2 , where k ≥ m and
j
i
for each j ≤ m there is i ≤ k such that l1 = l2 and ti1 ⊑ tj2 ;
(c) t1 = (:l11 : t11 , . . . , l1k : tk1 :) and t2 = (:l21 : t12 , . . . , l2m : tm
2 :), where k ≤ m and
for each i ≤ k there is j ≤ m such that l1i = l2j and ti1 ⊑ tj2 ;
...
nil
symbol
tuple
subtype
record
choice
...
none
Fig. 3: Two semilattices representing the seniority relation for terms of different
categories. The lower terms are the subtypes of the upper ones.
Given the relation t ⊑ t′ , we say that t′ is senior to t and t is junior to t′ .
Proposition 1. The seniority relation ⊑ is trivially a partial order, and (T, ⊑)
is a pair of upper and lower semilattices (Fig. 3).
The seniority relation represents the subtyping relation on terms. If a term
t′ describes the input interface of a component, then the component can process
any message described by a term t, such that t ⊑ t′ .
Although the seniority relation is straightforwardly defined for ground terms,
terms that are present in the interfaces of components can contain variables and
flags. Finding such ground term values for the variables and such Boolean values
for the flags that the seniority relation holds represents a CSP problem, which
is formally introduced next.
4
Constraint Satisfaction Problem for KPN
In this section we define a Constraint Satisfaction Problem for Kahn Process
Networks (CSP-KPN). We regard a KPN network as a directed weakly connected labeled graph G = (V, E, L), where
1. V is a set of vertices. The vertices correspond to individual Kahn processes.
2. E is a set of edges, where each edge e ∈ E is an ordered pair of vertices (v, v ′ ),
v, v ′ ∈ V. The edges correspond to channels connecting Kahn processes.
3. A function L : E → Term × Term assigns a label3 to each edge e ∈ E which
represents a pair of MDL terms L(e) = t ⊑ t′ called a constraint 4 . It defines the input requirements and the output properties associated with the
channel.
Given a graph G = (V, E, L) we define the set of constraints as
[
C(G) =
L(e),
e∈E
3
4
we use the same word “label” to refer to the mark on a graph edge and the symbol
that labels a term in a record or a choice; however our intention is always clear from
the context.
in the rest of the paper symbol ⊑ denotes the seniority relation for a pair ground
terms; alternatively, if the terms are not ground, ⊑ specifies a constraint.
the sets of up-coerced term variables V ↑ (G) and down-coerced term variables as
V ↓ (G)
[
[
V ↓ (t) ∪ V ↓ (t′ ),
V ↑ (t) ∪ V ↑ (t′ ) and V ↓ (G) =
V ↑ (G) =
t⊑t′ ∈C(G)
t⊑t′ ∈C(G)
and the set of flags F (G) as
F (G) =
[
F (t) ∪ F (t′ ).
t⊑t′ ∈C(G)
Assume a vector of flags f~ = (f1 , . . . , fl ), a vector of term variables 8~v =
(8v1 , . . . , 8vm ), a vector of Boolean values ~b = (b1 , . . . , bl ) and a vector of terms
~s = (s1 , . . . , sm ). Then for each term t
1. t[f~/~b] denotes the vector obtained as a result of the simultaneous replacement
of fi with bi for each 1 ≤ j ≤ l;
2. t[8~v /~s] denotes the vector obtained as a result of the simultaneous replacement of 8vi with si for each 1 ≤ i ≤ m;
3. t[f~/~b, 8~v /~s] is a shortcut for t[f~/~b][8~v /~s].
Assume a KPN graph G = (V, E, L) such that |F (G)| = l, |V ↑ (G)| = m,
|V (G)| = n and for some l, m, n ≥ 0.
↓
Definition 2 (CSP-KPN). We define a CSP for a KPN graph G (CSP-KPN)
as follows: for each t ⊑ t′ ∈ C(G) find a vector of Boolean values ~b = (b1 , . . . , bl ),
a vectors of ground terms ~t = (t1 , . . . , tm ), ~t′ = (t′1 , . . . , t′n ) such that
t[f~/~b, ↑~v /~t, ↓~v /~t′ ] ⊑ t′ [f~/~b, ↑~v /~t, ↓~v /~t′ ],
where f~ = (f1 , . . . , fl ), ↑~v = (↑v1 , . . . , ↑vm ), ↓~v = (↓v1 , . . . , ↓vn ). The tuple
(~b, ~t, ~t′ ) is called a solution.
A CSP-KPN is decidable since the message definition language we introduced can be seen as a term algebra, and decision problems for term algebras
are decidable [15].
5
Adjunct SAT
The CSP-KPN solution algorithm presented in the next section is iterative and
takes advantage of the order-theoretical structure of the MDL (Proposition 1).
Let B0 ⊆ B1 ⊆ · · · ⊆ Bs be sets of Boolean constraints, and ~a↑ and ~a↓ be
vectors of semiground terms such that |~a↑ | = |V ↑ (G)| and |~a↓ | = |V ↓ (G)|. The
vectors ~a↑ and ~a↓ are conditional approximations of the solution.
We seek the solution as a fixed point of a series of approximations in the
following form:
(B0 , ~a↑0 , ~a↓0 ), . . . , (Bs−1 , ~a↑s−1 , ~a↓s−1 ), (Bs , ~a↑s , ~a↓s ),
Algorithm 1 CSP-KPN(G)
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
c ← |C(G)|
i←0
B0 ← ∅
~a↑0 ← (none, . . . , none)
~a↓0 ← (nil, . . . , nil)
repeat
for 1 ≤ j ≤ c : tj ⊑ t′j ∈ C(G) do
(Bi·c+j , ~a↑i·c+j , ~a↓i·c+j ) ← Solve(Bi·c+j−1 , ~a↑i·c+j−1 , ~a↓i·c+j−1 , true, tj , t′j )
end for
i←i+1
until (SAT(Bi·c ), ~a↑i·c , ~a↓i·c ) = (SAT(B(i−1)·c ), ~a↑(i−1)·c , ~a↓(i−1)·c )
if Bi·c is unsatisfiable then
return Unsat
else
return (SATSol(Bi·c ), ~a↑i·c [f~/~b], ~a↓i·c [f~/~b])
end if
where for every 1 ≤ k ≤ s and a vector of Boolean values ~b that is a solution to
SAT(Bk ) (by SAT(Bk ) we mean a set of Boolean vector satisfying Bk ):
~a↑k−1 [f~/~b] ⊑ ~a↑k [f~/~b]
and
~a↓k [f~/~b] ⊑ ~a↓k−1 [f~/~b],
(1)
where the elements of the vectors are compared pairwise. The starting point is
B0 = ∅, ~a↑0 = (none, . . . , none), ~a↓0 = (nil, . . . , nil) and the series terminates as
soon as SAT(Bs ) = SAT(Bs−1 ), ~a↑s = ~a↑s−1 , ~a↓s = ~a↓s−1 .
The adjunct set of Boolean constraints potentially expands at every iteration
of the algorithm by inclusion of further logic formulas called assertions into its
conjunction as the algorithm processes constraints C(G). Whether the set of
Boolean constraints actually expands or not can be determined by checking the
satisfiability of SAT(Bk ) 6= SAT(Bk−1 ) for the current iteration k.
We argue below that if the original CSP-KPN is satisfiable then so is
SAT(Bs ) and that the tuple of vectors (b~s , ~a↑s [f~/b~s ], ~a↓s [f~/b~s ]) is a solution to
the former, where b~s is a solution of SAT(Bs ). In other words, the iterations
terminate when the conditional approximation limits the term variables, and
when the adjunct SAT constrains the flags enough to ensure the satisfaction of
all CSP-KPN constraints. In general, the set SAT(Bs ) can have more than one
solution. We select one of them, denoted by SATSol(Bs ) in the algorithm.
6
Algorithm
In this section we present Algorithm 1 which solves CSP-KPN for a given KPN
graph G = (V, E, L). It performs the following steps.
The algorithm iterates over the set of constraints C(G) and at each step it
builds a closer approximation of the solution. The relation between two consequent approximations satisfies formulas (1).
The function Solve() solves the constraint tj ⊑ t′j (see equation (2) in
Lemma 1) and updates the vectors ~a↑i·c+j and ~a↓i·c+j with new values. Furthermore, it adds Boolean assertions presented below that ensure 1) satisfaction
of the constraint for any ~b ∈ SAT(Bi·c+j ) as provided by Definition 1; and 2)
well-formedness of the terms occurring in it.
The algorithm terminates if Bi·c ≡ B(i−1)·c , ~a↑i·c = ~a↑(i−1)·c and ~a↓i·c = ~a↓(i−1)·c .
Well-formedness assertions for records and choices. Any pair of elements
in a well-formed record/choice cannot have equal labels. Therefore, for each
record {l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , l1 (bn ): tn } and each choice (:l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , l1 (bn ): tn :) occurring anywhere in C(G) the following assertion is added to the SAT:
^
¬(bi ∧ bj ).
∀1≤i,j≤n : li =lj
Well-formedness assertions for switches. A well-formed switch term must
have exactly one positive guard. Hence, for each switch hb1 : t1 , . . . , bn : tn i occurring anywhere in C(G) the following assertion is added to the SAT:
^
(b1 ∨ · · · ∨ bn ) ∧
¬(bi ∧ bj ).
∀1≤i,j≤n : i6=j
Order assertions. We generate two kinds of order assertions.
1. If a variable 8x is junior to two incommensurable, identically guarded terms
8x ⊑ h. . . : b : t1 . . .i and 8x ⊑ h. . . : b : t2 . . .i, where neither t1 ⊑ t2 nor
t2 ⊑ t1 , the assertion ¬b is added to the adjunct SAT.
2. For each c ∈ C(G) of the form hb1 : t1 , . . . , bn : tn i ⊑ hb′1 : t′1 , . . . , b′m : t′m i , the
assertion ¬(bi ∧ b′j ) is added to the adjunct SAT if ti 6⊑ t′j .
Further details are found in Appendix A.
Lemma 1 (Loop invariant). Algorithm 1 finds a series of approximations in
the form of
(Bk0 , ~a↑k0 , ~a↓k0 ), . . . , (Bks−1 , ~a↑ks−1 , ~a↓ks−1 ), (Bks , ~a↑ks , ~a↓ks ),
where ki = i · |C(G)|, and such that the following holds for any ~bki ∈ SAT(Bki ).
1. Bki ⊇ Bki−1 ;
2. ~a↑ki−1 [f~/~bki ] ⊑ ~a↑ki [f~/~bki ] and ~a↓ki [f~/~bki ] ⊑ ~a↓ki−1 [f~/~bki ];
3. ∄ (~a′ , ~a′′ ):
(a) ~a↑ki−1 [f~/~bki ] ⊑ ~a′ [f~/~bki ], ~a′ [f~/~bki ] ⊑ ~a↑ki [f~/~bki ];
(b) ~a↓ [f~/~bk ] ⊑ ~a′′ [f~/~bk ], ~a′′ [f~/~bk ] ⊑ ~a↓ [f~/~bk ].
ki
i
i
i
ki−1
i
given (Bki−1 , ~a↑ki−1 , ~a↓ki−1 ), the
Proof. Let c = |C(G)|. To construct
algorithm iteratively calls Solve() function (see Appendix A).
(Bki , ~a↑ki , ~a↓ki )
(Br , ~a↑r , ~a↓r ) ← Solve(Br−1 , ~a↑r−1 , ~a↓r−1 , true, tj , t′j )
where r = ki−1 + j, 1 ≤ j ≤ c and ki = ki−1 + c. For any tj ⊑ t′j , Solve() constructs the Boolean constraints Br , and finds ~a↑r and ~a↓r by solving the equation
t[f~/~br−1, ↑~v /~a↑r−1 , ↓~v /~a↓r ] = t′ [f~/~br−1 , ↑~v /~a↑r , ↓~v /~a↓r−1 ],
(2)
1. Bki ⊇ Bki−1 by construction: Solve() only adds new Boolean constraints to
the existing set.
2. Solve() iteratively constructs the local approximation for each constraint.
The series of local approximations converges to the global approximation.
3. Proof by contradiction. Assume that (~a↑r , ~a↓r ) is a solution of (2) and there
exists another solution (~a′ , ~a′′ ), such that ~a′ 6= ~a↑r and ~a′′ 6= ~a↓r . Then
t[f~/~br−1 , ↑~v /~a↑r−1 , ↓~v /~a′′ ] = t′ [f~/~br−1 , ↑~v /~a′ , ↓~v /~a↓r−1 ].
Two ground terms are equal only if they represent the same term, and,
therefore, ~a′ = ~a↑r and ~a′′ = ~a↓r , which contradicts the initial assumption. ⊓
⊔
Theorem 1 (Termination). CSP-KPN(G) terminates after a finite number
of steps for any KPN graph G.
Proof. For a given graph G the number of flags, variables and labels for records
and choices is bounded. There are two ways to produce new terms: either to
add entries with new labels to records and choices, or to substitute subterms for
terms.
1. The number of new terms constructed by adding new entries is bounded
because the number of labels in a given G is finite.
2. The number of terms constructed by substituting subterms for other terms
is bounded because a) the number of variables is finite (the algorithm does
not generate new variables); b) after the variables have been instantiated,
the category of the term cannot be changed, otherwise, the seniority relation
would be violated.
It implies that for each ↑v ∈ V ↑ (G) there exists a ground term t̄, such that ↑v ⊑ t̄,
and for each ↓v ∈ V ↓ (G) there exists a ground term t, such that t ⊑ ↓v. Providing
that |SAT(Bki )| ≤ |SAT(Bki−1 )|, the algorithm terminates after a finite number
of steps.
⊓
⊔
Theorem 2. Assume a KPN graph G = (V, E, L). The set of constraints C(G)
is inconsistent if and only if CSP-KPN(G) returns Unsat.
Proof. As the initial approximation the algorithm selects the weakest approximation (∅, (none, . . . , none), (nil, . . . , nil)), it follows from Lemma 1 that the algorithm iterates over all possible approximations in consecutive order starting
from (Bk0 , ~a↑k0 , ~a↓k0 ). Therefore, the algorithm cannot skip a solution if one exists.
By Theorem 1 the algorithm terminates after a finite number of steps. Hence, it
returns Unsat only if and only if the set of constraints C(G) cannot be satisfied.
⊓
⊔
message
message
variant
variant
variant
_1_init(vector<vector<double> img);
_2_error(string msg);
_1_read_color(string fname) { _1_init(...); ... _2_error(...); }
_1_read_grayscale(string fname) {...}
_1_read_unchanged(string fname) {...}
(a) The source code
IN
1: (: read_color(c): {fname: string | $_rc},
read_grayscale(g): {fname: string | $_rg},
read_unchanged(u): {fname: string | $_ru} | $^r :)
OUT
1: (: init(or c g u): {img: vector<vector<double>>, | $_ro1 } | $^r :)
2: (: error(or c g u): {msg: string | $_ro2 } :)
$_rc <= $_ro1; $_rg <= $_ro1; $_ru <= $_ro1;
$_rc <= $_ro2; $_rg <= $_ro2; $_ru <= $_ro2;
(b) The interface
Fig. 4: The source code and the interface of the component read of the image
processing algorithm
7
Communication Protocol
In this section we demonstrate interfaces with flow inheritance and code customisation using the example from Section 2. The interfaces are defined as choiceof-records terms. Labels in the choice term of the input interface correspond
to function names that can process messages tagged with corresponding labels.
Output messages are produced by calling special functions called salvos. The
name of a salvo corresponds to one of the labels in the output choice term.
The compatibility of two components connected by a channel is defined by the
seniority relation.
Consider the source code and the interface of the component read in Fig. 4.
Integers that have been added as prefixes to functions in the code specify the
channels that messages are received from and sent to. In the interfaces we use
prefixes $^ and $_ before identifiers to denote up- and down-coerced variables,
respectively.
A tail variable $^r in the interface enables flow inheritance for choices: variants from the input channel that cannot be processed by the component (i.e. all
variants but read_color, read_grayscale or read_unchanged), are absorbed
by $^r. Thus, the messages of type Mr1 that contain the name of the image file
are processed by the component and the messages of type Mi1 are inherited to
the output and forwarded directly to the component init.
Flow inheritance for records is realised by down-coerced variables $_rc, $_rg,
$_ru, $_ro1, $_ro2, and a set of auxiliary constraints. A record in the input
message contains an entry with the label K, which a processing function does
not expect. After solving the CSP, the entry is added to the tail variable $_ro1,
because the solver deduces that the element with the label K is required by the
component init.
Furthermore, we use flags c, g and u to exclude the code that is not used in
the context. The guards in the output interface employ the joint set of flags from
the input variants that can fire salvos specified in the output interface. In the example all three functions can fire init and error salvos; accordingly, the salvos’
guards are c ∨ g ∨ u. The solver deduces that that the variants read_grayscale
and read_unchanged cannot receive any messages, and, therefore, their respective processing functions can be excluded from the code.
To facilitate decontextualisation we introduce a wrapper for every component
called a shell : an auxiliary configuration file that provides facilities for renaming
labels in output records and choices and changing the routing of output messages.
The source code and the interfaces for the other two components are available
in the repository [11].
8
Implementation
We implemented the solver [16] for the CSP-KPN in OCaml. It works on top
of the PicoSAT [17] library, the latter used as a subsolver dealing with Boolean
assertions. The input for the solver is a set of constraints and the output is in
the form of assignments to flags and term variables.
We also developed a toolchain in C++ and OCaml that performs the interface
reconciliation in five steps:
1. Given a set of C++ sources (the components), augment them with macros
acting as placeholders for the code that enables flow-inheritance.
2. Derive the interfaces from the code.
3. Given the interfaces and a netlist that specifies a KPN graph, construct the
constraints to be passed on to the CSP-KPN algorithm.
4. Run the solver.
5. Based on the solution, generate header files for every component with macro
definitions. In addition, the tool generates the API functions to be called
when a component sends or receives a message.
Advantages of the presented design are the following:
– Interfaces and the code behind them can be generic as long as they are
sufficiently configurable. No communication between component designers is
necessary to ensure consistency in the design.
– Configuration and compilation of every component is separated from the rest
of the application. This prevents source code leaks in proprietary software
running in the Cloud.5
5
which is otherwise a serious problem. For example, proprietary C++ libraries that use
templates cannot be distributed in binary form due to restrictions of the language’s
static specialisation mechanism.
9
Conclusion and Future Work
We have presented a new static mechanism for coordinating component interfaces based on CSP and SAT that checks compatibility of component interfaces
connected in a network with support of overloading and structural subtyping.
We developed a fully decoupled Message Definition Language that can be used
in the context of KPN for coordinating components written in any programming language. We defined the interface of C++ components to demonstrate the
binding between the MDL and message processing functions. Our techniques
support genericity, inheritance and structural subtyping, thanks to the order
relation defined on MDL terms.
On the theory side, we presented the CSP solution algorithm, showed its
correctness and identified the termination condition. Although we assume that
the algorithm is NP-complete because of the SAT problem, which needs to be
solved as a subproblem, the complexity of the algorithm will be evaluated in
further research.
The next step will be to support multiple flow inheritance in the MDL, to
enable combined structures with inheritance (for example, (union ↓a ↓b) represents a record that contains a union of entries associated with records ↓a and ↓b).
This would allow one to design components that perform synchronisation and
merge multiple messages into one while preserving the inheritance mechanism
of a vertex.
In the context of Cloud, our results may prove useful to the software-asservice community since we can support much more generic interfaces than are
currently available without exposing the source code of proprietary software
behind them. Building KPNs the way we do could enable service providers to
configure a solution for a network customer based on components that they have
at their disposal as well as those provided by other providers and the customer
themselves, all solely on the basis of interface definitions and automatic tuning
to nonlocal requirements.
References
1. Northrop, L., Feiler, P., Gabriel, R.P., Goodenough, J., Linger, R., Longstaff, T.,
Kazman, R., Klein, M., Schmidtd, D., Sullivan, K., Wallnau, K.: Ultra-LargeScale Systems: The Software Challenge of the Future. Technical report, Software
Engineering Institute, Carnegie-Mellon (2006)
2. Kahn, G.: The Soemantics of Simple Language for Parallel Programming. In: IFIP
Congress. (1974) 471–475
3. Jesshope, C., Shafarenko, A.: Concurrency engineering. In: 13th Asia-Pacific Computer Systems Architecture Conference, ACSAC 2008. (2008) 1–8
4. Grelck, C., Scholz, S.B., Shafarenko, A.: A Gentle Introduction to S-Net: Typed
Stream Processing and Declarative Coordination of Asynchronous Components.
Parallel Processing Letters 18(2) (2008) 221–237
5. Ahuja, S., Carriero, N., Gelernter, D.: Linda and Friends. Computer 19(8) (August
1986) 26–34
6. Budimlić, Z., Burke, M., Cavé, V., Knobe, K., Lowney, G., Newton, R., Palsberg,
J., Peixotto, D., Sarkar, V., Schlimbach, F., et al.: Concurrent Collections. Scientific Programming 18(3) (2010) 203–217
7. Arbab, F.: A Channel-Based Coordination Model for Component Composition. In:
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, University Press (2002) 329–366
8. Kemper, S.: SAT-based Verification for Timed Component Connectors. Science of
Computer Programming 77(78) (2012) 779 –798
9. Vrba, v., Halvorsen, P., Griwodz, C., Beskow, P., Espeland, H., Johansen, D.:
The Nornir run-time system for parallel programs using Kahn process networks
on multi-core machines — a flexible alternative to MapReduce. The Journal of
Supercomputing 63(1) (2013) 191–217
10. Strachey, C.: Fundamental concepts in programming languages. Higher-order and
symbolic computation 13(1-2) (2000) 11–49
11. Zaichenkov, P.: Image Segmentation using K-means Clustering.
https://github.com/zayac/joule/tree/kmeans (June 2015) (accessed June 16,
2015).
12. MacQueen, J.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations (1967)
13. Gaster, B.R., Jones, M.P.: A Polymorphic Type System for Extensible Records
and Variants. Technical report (1996)
14. Leijen, D.: Extensible records with scoped labels (September 2005)
15. Ferrante, J., Rackoff, C.W.: The computational complexity of logical theories.
Lecture notes in mathematics. Springer-Verlag (1979)
16. Zaichenkov, P.: The toolchain and the solver for interface reconciliation in KPNs.
https://github.com/zayac/joule (June 2015) (accessed June 16, 2015).
17. Biere, A.: Picosat essentials. Journal on Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and
Computation (JSAT) (2008)
A
Appendix: Solve function
Algorithm 2 Solve(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
20:
21:
22:
23:
24:
25:
26:
27:
28:
29:
30:
31:
32:
B̂i ← AssertWellFormed(AssertWellFormed(Bi , b, t), b, t′ )
if ((t = none or t′ = nil) and (t 6= none or t′ 6= nil))
or (t and t′ are ground, and t = t′ ) then
return (B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i )
else if t = ↑v and t′ = ↑v ′ then
Bi+1 , ~a↑i+1 ← set a new approximation for ↑v ′ equal to the one of ↑v
else if t = ↓v and t′ = ↓v ′ then
Bi+1 , ~a↓i+1 ← set a new approximation for ↓v equal to the one of ↓v ′
return (Bi+1 , ~a↑i , ~a↓i+1 )
else if t is nil, symbol, tuple or record, and t′ = ↓v ′ then
return Solve(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ [↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ])
else if t is a choice and t′ = ↑v ′ then
Bi+1 , ~a↑i+1 ← set a new approximation for ↑v ′ as t[↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ] when b
return (Bi+1 , ~a↑i+1 , ~a↓i )
else if t = ↓v, and t′ is nil, symbol, tuple or record then
Bi+1 , ~a↓i+1 ← set a new approximation for ↓v as t′ [↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ] when b
return (Bi+1 , ~a↓i , ~a↓i+1 )
else if t = ↑v and t′ is a choice then
return Solve(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t[↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ], t′ )
else if t and t′ are tuples then
return SolveTupleTuple(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
else if t = nil and t′ is a record then
return SolveNilRecord(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t′ )
else if t and t′ are records then
return SolveRecordRecord(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
else if t and t′ are choices then
return SolveChoiceChoice(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
else if t or t′ is a switch then
return SolveSwitch(B̂i , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
else
return (B̂i ∪ {¬b}, ~a↑i , ~a↓i )
end if
Algorithm 3 AssertWellFormed(Bi , b, t)
1: if t is a record {l1 (b1S): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn } or (:l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn :) then
{b → ¬(bi ∧ bj )}
2:
Bi+1 ← Bi
∀1≤i,j≤n : li =lj
3: else if t is a switch hb1 : t1 , . . . , bn : tS
n i then
4:
Bi+1 ← Bi ∪ {b1 ∨ · · · ∨ bn }
{b → ¬(bi ∧ bj )}
∀1≤i,j≤n : i6=j
5: end if
6: return Bi+1
Algorithm 4 SolveTupleTuple(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
Let t be of the form (t1 . . . tn )
g ← t′ [↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ]
if g = (t′1 . . . t′m ) and n = m then
for i : 1 ≤ j ≤ n do
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b, tj , t′j )
end for
return (Bi+n , ~a↑i+n , ~a↓i+n )
else
return (Bi ∪ {¬b}, ~a↑i+n , ~a↓i+n )
end if
Algorithm 5 SolveNilRecord(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t′ )
1: g ← t′ [↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ]
′
2: Let g be of the form {l1′ (b′1 ): t′1 , . . . , lm
(b′m ): t′m }
n
V
¬b′j }, ~a↑i , ~a↓i )
3: return (Bi ∪ {b →
j=1
Algorithm 6 SolveRecordRecord(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
g ← t′ [↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ]
if t = {l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn } then
for j : 1 ≤ j ≤ m do
if ∃k : lk ∈ t, lk = lj′ then
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b → b′j → bk , tk , t′j )
else
Bi+j ← Bi+j−1 ∪ {b → ¬b′j }
end if
end for
else if t = {l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn |↓v} then
for j : 1 ≤ j ≤ m do
if ∃k : lk ∈ t, lk = lj′ then
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b → b′j → bk , tk , t′j )
else
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← set a new approximation for ↓v as lj′ (b′j ): t′j when b
end if
end for
end if
return (Bi+m , ~a↑i+m , ~a↓i+m )
Algorithm 7 SolveChoiceChoice(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
14:
15:
16:
17:
18:
19:
g ← t[↑~v /~a↑i , ↓~v /~a↓i ]
if t′ = (:l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn :) then
for j : 1 ≤ j ≤ m do
if ∃k : lk ∈ t, lk′ = lj then
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b → bj → b′k , tj , t′k )
else
Bi+j ← Bi+j−1 ∪ {b → ¬b′j }
end if
end for
else if t′ = (:l1 (b1 ): t1 , . . . , ln (bn ): tn |↑v:) then
for j : 1 ≤ j ≤ m do
if ∃k : lk ∈ t, lk = lj′ then
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b → bj → b′k , tj , t′k )
else
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← set a new approximation for ↑v as (:lj (bj ): tj :) when b
end if
end for
end if
return (Bi+m , ~a↑i+m , ~a↓i+m )
Algorithm 8 SolveSwitch(Bi , ~a↑i , ~a↓i , b, t, t′ )
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
9:
10:
if t = hb1 : t1 , . . . , bn : tn i then
for j : 1 ≤ i ≤ n do
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b, tj , t′ )
end for
else if t′ = hb′1 : t′1 , . . . , b′n : t′n i then
for i : 1 ≤ j ≤ n do
Bi+j , ~a↑i+j , ~a↓i+j ← Solve(Bi+j−1 , ~a↑i+j−1 , ~a↓i+j−1 , b, t, t′j )
end for
end if
return (Bi+n , ~a↑i+n , ~a↓i+n )
| 6cs.PL
|
1
Isogeometric Analysis Simulation of TESLA
Cavities Under Uncertainty
arXiv:1711.01828v1 [physics.comp-ph] 6 Nov 2017
Jacopo Corno∗† , Carlo de Falco†‡ , Herbert De Gersem∗ , Sebastian Schöps∗
∗ Institut für Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder, TU Darmstadt, Germany
† MOX Modeling and Scientific Computing, Politecnico di Milano, Italy
‡ CEN - Centro Europeo di Nanomedicina, Milano, Italy
Abstract—In the design of electromagnetic devices the
accurate representation of the geometry plays a crucial
role in determining the device performance. For accelerator cavities, in particular, controlling the frequencies
of the eigenmodes is important in order to guarantee the
synchronization between the electromagnetic field and the
accelerated particles.
The main interest of this work is in the evaluation of
eigenmode sensitivities with respect to geometrical changes
using Monte Carlo simulations and stochastic collocation.
The choice of an IGA approach for the spatial discretization
allows for an exact handling of the domains and their
deformations, guaranteeing, at the same time, accurate and
highly regular solutions.
I. I NTRODUCTION
The performance of electromagnetic devices such as,
for example, energy transducers, magnetrons, waveguides, antennas and linear accelerators is strongly related
to the shape of the devices themselves. In particle accelerator cavities, in particular, the acceleration of the
particle beam is achieved by exciting specific eigenmodes
in the cavity and the resonant frequencies need to be
synchronized with the flying particles to guarantee the
acceleration. Even small mechanical deformations, either
due to manufacturing imperfections or to the electromagnetic pressure (Lorentz detuning) may cause a nonnegligible frequency shift [2], [7].
A correct representation and handling of the domain is
then of great importance when implementing a simulation
scheme. It has been shown in [7] that the Isogeometric
Analysis (IGA) discretization methods introduced in [3],
[4] can produce a highly accurate solution, for example
for the coupled electromagnetic-mechanic problem modeling Lorenz detuning.
The focus of this paper is on quantifying the uncertainty of linear accelerator superconducting cavities in
frequency domain, or more precisely the sensitivity of
the solution of Maxwell’s eigenvalue problem
∇ × µ−1 ∇ × E = ω 2 εE
(1)
with respect to (randomly) perturbed domains Ω(y), as
in e.g. [1], where E is the electric field, y are geometry
parameters, µ, ε and ω are the permeability, permittivity
and angular frequency, respectively.
The paper is structured as follows, Section 2 and
3 discuss the main ideas behind IGA and Uncertainty
Quantification (UQ). In Section 4 and 5 the methods are
applied to a benchmark example (pillbox) and the TESLA
cavity [6]. The sensitivity of the eigenfrequencies are
investigated with respect to uncertain design parameters.
Furthermore, non axis-symmetric deformations are taken
into consideration.
II. I SOGEOMETRIC A NALYSIS
In classical discretization methods such as the Finite
Element Method (FEM), two steps are usually required:
first, the meshing step, i.e., the discretization of the
geometry from a Computer Aided Design (CAD) representation, in, typically, hexahedral or tetrahedral elements. Secondly the discretization of the set of equations
describing the problem to solve. In [3], Hughes et. al
proposed a new approach, called Isogeometric Analysis,
were the same basis functions that CAD uses for the
description of geometries (e.g. B-Splines and NURBS)
are used also as a basis for the solution of the partial
differential equations. The IGA paradigm guarantees the
Fig. 1: Cylindrical pillbox cavity.
c 2015 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or
future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works,
for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
2
exact description of the computational domain throughout
all the analysis, even at the coarsest level of refinement.
d-dimensional B-Splines basis functions are defined
in the reference space [0, 1]d following a tensor product
approach. Along each dimension let p be the degree and
Ξ = [ξ0 , ..., ξn+p+1 ] be a knot vector subdividing the unit
segment [0, 1]. The Cox-de Boor formula then defines the
n + 1 basis functions {Bip }n0 . A B-spline in the physical
space is obtained by a mapping
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Fig. 2: B-Spline basis functions of 2nd degree in 1D obtained
with knots Ξ = [0, 0, 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1, 1, 1].
x=
n
X
Bip Pi
(2)
i=0
where Pi are called control points and acts as degrees
of freedom for the curve. Surfaces and volumes are the
result of tensorization.
As shown in Fig. 2, B-Splines basis functions have
higher regularity properties with respect to classical FEM
(a B-Spline of degree p can have in general up to p − 1
global derivatives whereas FEM basis are only C 0 across
the element boundaries). As a consequence of this, IGA
has proven to have a higher accuracy w.r.t. the number
of degrees of freedom than classical FEM.
The features of IGA are particulary beneficial for
quantification of uncertainty related to shape. The CAD
representation is not lost in the meshing process, it is
possible to easily modify the geometry and for each
modified domain there is no need to perform remeshing
when deforming the geometry.
are a sufficient measure but often one is interested in
statistics of outputs. They can be quantified by stochastic
moments as expected value and variance
Z ∞
E(f ) =
f (E(y))ρ(y) dy
(5)
−∞
Z ∞
2
f (E(y)) − E(f ) ρ(y) dy
var(f ) =
(6)
−∞
p
or the standard deviation std(f0 ) := var(f0 ). However,
those integrals can rarely be solved exactly and thus one
relies on numerical methods.
One way out is the well-known Monte Carlo (MC)
sampling method [5]. In this case the set of equations
describing the problem is solved M times, for M realizations yi . The results obtained for E are then used to
estimate expectations values of the desired quantity of
interest by sample averages:
E(f ) ≈
III. U NCERTAINTY Q UANTIFICATION
(3)
The question is then how the input uncertainty E affects
the quantity of interest f (E), e.g., a cavity’s eigenfrequency. In many applications classical (local) sensitivities, i.e.,
Df (E) =
∂
f (E)
∂E
(7)
i=1
When dealing with mathematical models, e.g. partial
differential equations, one has to consider that the input
parameters might be affected by uncertainty. Let θ be a
random event and y(θ) a vector containing N random
input parameters yi (θ) with density ρ(y). Supposing the
problem under consideration, i.e., (1), is well defined for
any y, then the solution is itself a random variable
E = E(y(θ)).
M
1 X
f (E(yi )).
M
(4)
More sophisticated approaches exploit the regularity of
the solution to increase the speed of convergence, e.g.,
in the generalized Polynomial Chaos (gPC) the mapping
(3) from parameter to solution space is approximated
by polynomials of degree w [9]. This approximation
can be constructed by a basis of distribution dependent
orthonormal polynomials {ψp (y)}w
0 and a grid of points
yp in the parameter space (called collocation points), i.e.,
E(y) ≈
w
X
E(yp )ψp (y).
(8)
p=0
If the exact solution has a sufficiently smooth dependency
w.r.t. its parameters this method converges exponentially.
Unfortunately the rate depends heavily on the number
of random parameters such that the advantage is lost for
large N .
3
−2
10
−3
RelativeSError
10
−4
10
−5
10
GeoPDEsS−SFD
CSTSStudioS−SFD
CSTSStudioS−SSens.SAnalysis
−6
10
0.495
0.5
RadiusS[m]
Relative Error in Mean Frequency
100
10-2
10-4
10-6
10-8
10-10
0.505
Closed-form Solution
CST Studio (accuracy 1e-6)
GeoPDEs (accuracy 1e-6)
0
2
4
6
8
10
Number of Quadrature Nodes
(a) Sensitivity of the fundamental frequency
f0 in the cylindrical cavity w.r.t. a change in
the radius.
(b) Convergence of E(f0 ) using gPC, i.e.,
stochastic Gauss quadrature, for various models.
(c) Design parameters of the
TESLA cavity half-cell [6].
Fig. 3: Pillbox sensitivities, convergence of stochastic quadrature and TESLA cavity design
3
IV. P ILLBOX C AVITY
As a benchmark example we consider the case of a
cylindrical pillbox cavity with uncertain radius r (see
Fig. 1). We are interested in the resonant frequency of
the fundamental (accelerating) mode f0 and its sensitivity
w.r.t. the change in radius close to the design value
rd = 0.5 m. In this settings one may exactly characterize
the frequency and its derivative as
Mean Frequency [GHz]
2.5
2
1.5
1
0
f0 (r) =
Gc
,
2πr
df0 (r)
Gc
=−
dr
2πr2
where G ≈ 2.405 is the first zero of the Bessel function
of order 0 and c is the speed of light. In Figure 3a we
compare implementations of IGA (GeoPDEs [8]) to FEM
(CST EM Studio [10]). First, we compute the fundamental frequency for small perturbation of the radius across
the design value, using second order IGA and second
order FEM with the same level of accuracy. Secondly
we use Finite Differences (FD) to estimate the sensitivity.
It is clear from the figure that the FEM approximation
suffer heavily from the need of remeshing the geometry
each time the radius changes, while, even for this naı̈ve
approach, IGA obtains a smooth solution, since the
parametrization of the cylinder doesn’t change. Finally,
the magenta curve in Fig. 3a shows the results obtained
by the automated sensitivity analysis tool available in
CST: by using more sophisticated methods CST can
achieve higher precision but oscillations are still present.
To study the global sensitivity of f0 (r) an (artificial)
random radius r ∼ U(0.2 m, 0.8 m) is considered. We
compare the numerical approach (gPC with FEM and
Monopole Modes
Dipole Modes
Quadrupole Modes
0.5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
# Mode
Fig. 4: First 16 modes of one-cell TESLA cavity.
IGA) to the analytical solution
E(f0 ) = 0.2651115... Hz,
std(f0 ) = 0.1095555... Hz.
Fig. 3b depicts the rapid convergence until the accuracy
of the spatial discretization is reached.
V. TESLA C AVITY
Let us now consider the single cell TESLA cavity
geometry whose seven design parameters are described
in Figure 3c. Following [11], we apply UQ for design parameters albeit this restricts possible deviations
significantly and more realistic cases, such as nonaxissymmetric deformations, bumps/kinks due to welding, mechanical deformation due to Lorentz forces or
misalignment of the irisis cannot be represented.
We consider the parameters to be uncertain with mean
values equal to the TESLA mid-cell design [6] and
deviations yi ∼ ( − 0.125 mm, 0.125 mm). MC sampling
4
6
1.5
Standard Deviation [MHz]
5
Standard Deviation [MHz]
Monopole Modes
Dipole Modes
Quadrupole Modes
4
3
2
Monopole Modes
Dipole Modes
Quadrupole Modes
1
0.5
1
0
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
# Mode
(a) Eigenmodes due to uncertain design parameters
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
# Mode
(b) Eigenmodes due to elliptic deformation
Fig. 5: Standard deviations for the first 16 modes of the one-cell TESLA Cavity.
is applied to estimate mean values and standard deviation
of the resonant frequencies for the first 16 modes.
With respect to [11], where a 2D solver was used
to compute the accelerating frequency by exploiting the
cylindrical symmetry of the geometry, GeoPDEs is able
to solve the full 3D cavity, thus allowing for the computation of the full spectrum of frequencies, Fig. 4. In Fig. 5a
the standard deviation of these modes are depicted. The
values are in the MHz range with a maximum deviation
in correspondence of the third monopole mode.
A second case investigates elliptic deformations of the
cavity. For this the domain is deformed in such a way
that the cross section is no more a circle but an ellipse,
i.e., breaking symmetry. The deviation with respect to the
design geometry is chosen to be a uniformly distributed
random variable with zero mean and σ = 6.6667 · 10−5 ,
i.e., Req ∼ U(103.1mm, 103.5mm). The solution of the
eigenproblem is computed on a 10×10 grid of collocation
points for the first 16 modes as in the previous case.
Results (in Fig. 5b) suggest that possible elliptical deformations of the cavity play a slightly weaker role than the
design parameters. Nevertheless the higher order modes
are, once again, more effected than the fundamental one.
Future studies on the full 9-cell cavity should take into
account the necessity of including these modes in the
analysis.
VI. C ONCLUSIONS
In this paper the usage of IGA and gPC for the
uncertainty quantification of cavities was proposed since
those methods exploit the smoothness of the solution in
spatial and parameter domain. Academic and realistic
geometries underline that this methodology allows to
accurately quantify the impact of uncertainties.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work is supported by the “Excellence Initiative” of the German Federal and State Governments. the Graduate School CE at TU
Darmstadt and the DFG network “UQ for Cavities” (SCHM3127/21). C. de Falco’s work is partially funded by the “Start-up Packages
and PhD Program project”, co-funded by Regione Lombardia through
“Fondo per lo sviluppo e la coesione 2007-2013” (FAS program).
R EFERENCES
[1] L. Xiao et al., Modeling imperfection effects on dipole modes in
TESLA cavity, IEEE PAC 2007, 2454–2456, 2007.
[2] J. Deryckere, T. Roggen, B. Masschaele, and H. De Gersem,
Stochastic response surface method for studying microphoning
and lorentz detuning of accelerators cavities, ICAP2012, 158160, 2012.
[3] T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell, and Y. Bazilevs. Isogeometric
analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh
refinement, Comp. Meth. in App. Mech. and Eng., 194(39), 41354195, 2005.
[4] A. Buffa, G. Sangalli, and R. Vzquez, Isogeometric analysis in
electromagnetics: B-splines approximation, Comp. Meth. in App.
Mech. and Eng., 199, 1143-1152, 2010.
[5] Liu, J.S., Monte Carlo Strategies In Scientific Computing, Harvard
University, 2002.
[6] B. Aune et al., Superconducting tesla cavities. Physical Review
Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams, 3(9):092001, 2000.
[7] J. Corno, C. de Falco, H. De Gersem and S. Schöps, Isogeometric
Simulation of Lorentz Detuning in Superconducting Accelerator
Cavities, MOX Report 31/2014.
[8] C. de Falco, A. Reali, R. Vázquez, GeoPDEs: A research tool for
Isogeometric Analysis of PDEs, Advances in Eng. Soft., 12(42),
1020-1034, 2011.
[9] D. Xiu, Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A
Spectral Method Approach, Princeton University Press, 2010.
[10] CST EM STUDIO R , Computer Simulation Technology AG,
www.cst.com.
[11] C. Schmidt, T. Flisgen, J. Heller, U. van Rienen, Comparison
of techniques for uncertainty quantification of superconducting
radio frequency cavities, ICEAA 2014, 117–120, 2014.
[12] J. Gravesen, A. Evgrafov und D.-M. Nguyen, On the sensitivities of multiple eigenvalues, Structural and Multidisciplinary
Optimization 44.4, 583-587, 2011.
| 5cs.CE
|
0
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
MOSHE BABAIOFF, Microsoft Research, Herzeliya, Israel.
ROBERT D. KLEINBERG, Computer Science Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
ALEKSANDRS SLIVKINS, Microsoft Research, New York, NY, USA.
arXiv:1004.3630v5 [cs.GT] 15 Nov 2015
First version: April 2010
This version: November 2015
It is widely believed that computing payments needed to induce truthful bidding is somehow harder than
simply computing the allocation. We show that the opposite is true: creating a randomized truthful mechanism is essentially as easy as a single call to a monotone allocation rule. Our main result is a general procedure to take a monotone allocation rule for a single-parameter domain and transform it (via a black-box
reduction) into a randomized mechanism that is truthful in expectation and individually rational for every
realization. The mechanism implements the same outcome as the original allocation rule with probability
arbitrarily close to 1, and requires evaluating that allocation rule only once. We also provide an extension of
this result to multi-parameter domains and cycle-monotone allocation rules, under mild star-convexity and
non-negativity hypotheses on the type space and allocation rule, respectively.
Because our reduction is simple, versatile, and general, it has many applications to mechanism design
problems in which re-evaluating the allocation rule is either burdensome or informationally impossible. Applying our result to the multi-armed bandit problem, we obtain truthful randomized mechanisms whose
regret matches the information-theoretic lower bound up to logarithmic factors, even though prior work
showed this is impossible for truthful deterministic mechanisms. We also present applications to offline
mechanism design, showing that randomization can circumvent a communication complexity lower bound
for deterministic payments computation, and that it can also be used to create truthful shortest path auctions that approximate the welfare of the VCG allocation arbitrarily well, while having the same running
time complexity as Dijkstra’s algorithm.
Categories and Subject Descriptors: J.4 [Social and Behavioral Sciences]: Economics; K.4.4 [Computers and Society]: Electronic Commerce; F.2.2 [Analysis of Algorithms and Problem Complexity]:
Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problems
General Terms: theory, algorithms, economics
Additional Key Words and Phrases: algorithmic mechanism design, single-parameter mechanisms, multiarmed bandits, regret, multi-parameter mechanisms
This is a merged and revised version of the conference papers [Babaioff et al. 2010, 2013] that have appeared
in the ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (ACM EC) in 2010 and 2013, respectively. This paper contains all
results from [Babaioff et al. 2010] and the main result from [Babaioff et al. 2013] (in Section 8). This version
is updated to reflect the current status of the follow-up work and open questions.
Parts of this research have been done while R. Kleinberg was a Consulting Researcher at Microsoft Research
Silicon Valley. He was also supported by NSF Awards CCF-0643934 and AF-0910940, an Alfred P. Sloan
Foundation Fellowship, and a Microsoft Research New Faculty Fellowship.
0:2
M. Babaioff et al.
1. INTRODUCTION
Algorithmic Mechanism Design studies the problem of implementing the designer’s
goal under computational constraints. Multiple hurdles stand in the way for such implementation. Computing the desired outcome might be hard (as in the case of combinatorial auctions) or truthful payments implementing the goal might not exist (as
when exactly minimizing the make-span in machine scheduling [Archer and Tardos
2001]). Even when payments that will generate the right incentives do exist, finding such payments might be computationally costly or impossible due to online constraints.
It is widely believed that computing payments needed to induce truthful bidding is
somehow harder than simply computing the allocation. For example, the formula for
payments in a VCG mechanism involves recomputing the allocation with one agent
removed in order to determine that agent’s payment; this seemingly increases the required amount of computation by a factor of n + 1, where n is the number of agents.
Likewise, for truthful single-parameter mechanisms the formula for payments of a
given agent includes integrating the allocation rule over this agent’s bid [Myerson
1981; Archer and Tardos 2001]. In some contexts with incomplete observable information, such as online pay-per-click auctions, computing these “counterfactual allocations” may actually be information-theoretically impossible. This calls into question
the mechanism designer’s ability to compute payments that make an allocation rule
truthful, even when such payment functions are known to exist. Rigorous lower bounds
based on these observations have been established for the communication complexity [Babaioff et al. 2013] and regret [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009]
of truthful deterministic mechanisms.
In contrast to these negative results, we show that the opposite is true for randomized single-parameter mechanisms that are truthful-in-expectation: computing the allocation and payments is essentially as easy as a single call to the allocation rule. This
allows for positive results that circumvent the lower bounds for deterministic mechanisms cited earlier.
1.1. Single-parameter mechanisms
We consider an arbitrary single-parameter domain. The paradigmatic example is an
auction that allocates items between agents whose utility is linear in the number of
items they receive. The private information of each agent is expressed by a single parameter: her value per item.1 Each agent submits a bid, then the mechanism performs
the allocation and charges payments. A mechanism is called “truthful” if each agent
maximizes her utility by submitting her true value per item. The allocation rule in
a truthful mechanism is called “truthfully implementable”. It is known that an allocation rule is truthfully implementable if and only if it is “monotone”: increasing one
agent’s bid while keeping all other bids the same does not decrease this agent’s allocation [Myerson 1981; Archer and Tardos 2001]. A similar property holds for randomized
mechanisms and truthfulness-in-expectation.
Our contributions. Our main result is a general procedure to take any monotone-inexpectation allocation rule A and transform it into a randomized mechanism that is
truthful-in-expectation, implements the same outcome as A with probability arbitrarily close to 1, and requires evaluating that allocation rule only once. (We refer to this
1 In
a general single-parameter domain, the allocation rule selects an outcome from some arbitrary collection
of feasible outcomes. Each agent has her own type of “good”, and for each agent there is an arbitrary, publicly
known mapping from feasible outcomes to a real-valued amount of the corresponding good. The agent’s
utility is linear in this amount; the value per unit amount of good is her private information.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:3
procedure as the generic transformation.) The allocation rule A is accessed only as a
function call, so our result applies even if A is an online algorithm. Moreover, for each
realization of randomness an agent never loses by participating in the mechanism and
bidding truthfully; thus the agents are protected from undesirable random deviations.
We make a distinction between randomness in the mechanism and randomness in
“nature”: the environment that the mechanism interacts with. Randomness in nature
is subject to modeling assumptions and hence is less “reliable”; moreover, agents’ beliefs about nature may be different from the mechanism’s. On the other hand, randomness in the mechanism is fully controlled by the mechanism. Therefore it is desirable to
design mechanisms that are truthful in a stronger sense: in expectation over the mechanism’s random seed, for every realization of randomness in nature; we will call such
mechanisms ex-post truthful. It is easy to see from [Myerson 1981; Archer and Tardos
2001] that in any ex-post truthful mechanism the allocation rule must satisfy ex-post
monotonicity (which is defined similarly to ex-post truthfulness). In the generic transformation described above, if the original allocation rule A is ex-post monotone then
the resulting randomized mechanism is ex-post truthful.
Similarly, our result extends to Bayesian incentive-compatibility: if A is monotone
in expectation with respect to a Bayesian prior over other agents’ bids, then the mechanism is truthful in expectation over this prior.
Our generic transformation is particularly useful for mechanism design problems
in which re-evaluating the allocation rule is either burdensome or informationtheoretically impossible.
1.2. Bandit mechanisms
A leading problem for which only a single call to the allocation rule can be evaluated
is the multi-armed bandit (MAB) mechanism design problem [Babaioff et al. 2014;
Devanur and Kakade 2009]. In this problem information about the state of the world
is dynamically revealed during the allocation; the particular information that is revealed depends on the prior choices of the allocation, and in turn may impact the future choices. Simulating the allocation rule on different inputs may therefore require
information that was not observed on the actual run. This “informational obstacle” (insufficient observable information) is a crucial obstacle for deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanisms; it is used in [Babaioff et al. 2014] to derive that the appropriate
payments cannot be computed unless the allocation rule is very “naı̈ve” (and therefore
suboptimal).
To put more context, MAB mechanisms are motivated by online pay-per-click ad
auctions, and were suggested in [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009] as a
simple model which combines strategic bidding by agents and online learning by the
mechanism. Each agent has a single ad that she wants to display to users, and derives
utility only if her ad is clicked. The value per click is her private information. The
allocation rule proceeds in rounds: in each round the mechanism allocates one ad to be
shown to a user and observes whether this ad was clicked. The click probabilities (also
known as “click-through rates”, or CTRs) are unknown to the mechanism, and need to
be estimated during the run of the allocation rule. All bids are submitted before the
allocation starts, and all payments are assigned after it ends.
MAB mechanisms are related to MAB algorithms: the allocation rule is essentially
an MAB algorithm whose “rewards” are clicks weighted by the corresponding bids.
Moreover, welfare of an MAB mechanism is precisely the same as the total reward of
its allocation rule.2 Therefore one could directly compare the performance of truthful
2 This
is because payments cancel out: the total amount paid by the agents is equal to the total amount
received by the mechanism.
0:4
M. Babaioff et al.
MAB mechanisms with that of MAB algorithms; both can be quantified using regret:
the loss in welfare compared to the benchmark which always picks the best ad.
Following [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009], we focus on the stochastic version of the problem, i.e. we assume that the CTRs do not change over time. Then
the “randomness in nature” corresponds to the random clicks, and ex-post truthfulness means truthfulness for every realization of the clicks (but in expectation over the
randomness in the mechanism). Note that ex-post truthfulness is a very strong property which holds even if the clicks are chosen by an oblivious adversary. As discussed
in [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009], this property is highly desirable,
compared to the weaker notion of “truthfulness in expectation over clicks”, even if the
corresponding mechanism has regret guarantees that only apply to the stochastic setting.
Our contributions. Applying our generic transformation to the MAB problem we
derive that the problem of designing truthful MAB mechanisms reduces to the problem
of designing monotone MAB allocation rules. Such a problem has not been previously
studied in the rich literature on MAB.
Our main result in this direction is a randomized MAB mechanism that is ex-post
truthful and has regret O(T 1/2 ) for the stochastic version. This upper bound on regret matches the information-theoretic lower bound for algorithms in the same setting
(i.e., the lower bound holds even in the absence of incentive constraints). This stands
in contrast to the lower bound of [Babaioff et al. 2014], where it was shown that deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanisms must suffer a larger regret of Ω(T 2/3 ).
On a technical level, we design a new MAB allocation rule that is ex-post monotone and has regret O(T 1/2 ) for the stochastic setting. (We use it to obtain a randomized ex-post truthful MAB mechanism with the same regret.) Moreover, we show that
UCB1 [Auer et al. 2002a] (and a number of similar MAB algorithms) give rise to MAB
allocations that are monotone in expectation over clicks, and therefore can be transformed to randomized MAB mechanisms that are truthful in the same sense and have
optimal regret.
The new ex-post monotone MAB allocation rule is deterministic, which rigorously
confirms the intuition from [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009] that the
impossibility results for deterministic MAB mechanisms are caused by the “informational obstacle” (insufficient observable information about clicks) rather than ex-post
monotonicity.
1.3. Other contributions
Power of randomization. As a by-product of our analysis of MAB mechanisms,
we obtain an unconditional separation between the power of randomized vs. deterministic ex-post truthful mechanisms for welfare maximization, in the online setting. (The separation result is unconditional in the sense that it considers exactly
the same setting for both classes of mechanisms.) This complements the result of
Dobzinski and Dughmi [2009], which gives a separation between these two classes of
mechanisms in the offline setting, under a polynomial communication complexity constraint. It is worth noting that the separation in Dobzinski and Dughmi [2009] applies
to a rather unnatural problem (two-player multi-unit auctions in which if at least one
item is allocated, then all items are allocated and each player receives at least one
item) whereas our separation result is for a natural problem: online pay-per-click ad
auctions for a single slot, with unknown click-through rates.
For the objective of revenue maximization, separations between randomized and
deterministic mechanisms have been known for much longer [Thanassoulis 2004;
Manelli and Vincent 2006; Dobzinski et al. 2012; Briest et al. 2014] and are in some
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:5
sense less surprising. Randomization allows the mechanism to access a larger set of
possible allocations, i.e. the set of all probability distributions over pure allocations,
and in some cases this leads to greater revenue, for example by permitting more finegrained price discrimination between agent types. This is not the case for the objective
of maximizing welfare (because VCG mechanisms are deterministic and they maximize welfare pointwise while obeying incentive constraints). For welfare maximization, randomized mechanisms are sometimes more powerful than deterministic ones
due to other reasons, such as computational power or informational limitations (as in
the problem we study).
Offline mechanisms. Our main result also has implications for offline mechanism design. Nisan and Ronen, in their seminal paper [Nisan and Ronen 2001] which started
the field of algorithmic mechanism design, cite the apparent n-fold computational
overhead of computing VCG payments and pose the open question of whether payments can be computed faster than solving n versions of the original problem, e.g. for
VCG path auctions. Our result shows that the answer is affirmative, if one adopts
the truthful-in-expectation solution concept and tolerates a mechanism that outputs
an outcome whose welfare is a (1 + ǫ)-approximation to that of the VCG allocation,
for arbitrarily small ǫ > 0. Babaioff et al. [2013] present a social choice function f in
an n-player single-parameter domain such that the deterministic communication complexity required for truthfully implementing f exceeds that required for evaluating f
by a factor of n. Our result shows that no such lower bound holds when one considers
randomized mechanisms, again allowing for a small amount of random error in the
allocation.
Extension to multi-parameter mechanisms. We extend our generic transformation from single-parameter to multi-parameter mechanisms. It is known that a multiparameter allocation rule is truthfully implementable if and only if it satisfies a property called “cycle-monotonicity”. (This is a rather strong property which specializes to
monotonicity in the single-parameter case.) Similar to the single-parameter case, we
present a general procedure to take any cycle-monotone allocation rule A and transform it into a randomized mechanism that is truthful-in-expectation, implements the
same outcome as A with probability arbitrarily close to 1, and requires evaluating that
allocation rule only once. The technical contribution here is that we find a reduction
from the multi-parameter setting to the single-parameter case.
While much more general that our single-parameter transformation, this result may
be more difficult to apply. This is because cycle-monotonicity is known to be a very
restrictive property. However, the follow-up work already provides two applications,
see Section 2.1 for details.
1.4. Map of the paper
This paper makes four high-level contributions: the generic transformation for singleparameter mechanisms (Sections 4 and 5), the two applications to off-line mechanism
design (Section 6), the results on MAB mechanisms (Section 7), and an extension to
multi-parameter mechanisms (Section 8). Presenting these results requires a significant amount of preliminaries on mechanisms design (Section 3), multi-armed bandits
(Section 7.1), and multi-parameter mechanism (Section 8.1). We conclude with open
questions (Section 9).
A considerable amount of work followed up on the initial conference publication
[Babaioff et al. 2010] of this paper. This work is discussed in Section 2.1.
0:6
M. Babaioff et al.
2. RELATED WORK AND FOLLOW-UP WORK
The characterization of truthful mechanisms for single-parameter domains, given by
Myerson [1981] for single-item auctions and by Archer and Tardos [2001] for a more
general class of single-parameter problems, states that a mechanism is truthful if and
only if its allocation rule is monotone and its payment rule charges each agent its
value for the realized outcome, minus a correction term expressed as an integral over
all types lower than the agent’s declared type. Exact computation of this correction
term may be intractable, but Archer et al. [2004] developed a clever workaround: one
can use random sampling to compute an unbiased estimator of the correction term, at
the cost of evaluating the allocation rule once more. Thus, for n agents, the allocation
rule must be evaluated n + 1 times: once to determine the actual allocation, and once
more per agent to determine that agent’s payment. Our generic transformation relies
on a generalization of this random sampling technique, but we show how to avoid
recomputing the allocation rule when determining each agent’s payment, by coupling
payment generation with the allocation itself.
The question of whether computing payments is computationally harder than computing the allocation was raised by Nisan and Ronen [2001] in the context of VCG
path auctions. The most significant progress to date was the communication complexity lower bound of Babaioff et al. [2013] mentioned above.
Payment computation in online mechanism design is a central issue in the analysis of truthful MAB mechanisms in Babaioff et al. [2014] and Devanur and Kakade
[2009]. The main result of [Babaioff et al. 2014] is a characterization of deterministic ex-post truthful mechanisms. It is more restrictive than the Myerson and ArcherTardos characterization. The reason is that computing an agent’s payment requires
knowing how many clicks she would have received if she had submitted a lower bid
value, which may require the mechanism to hypothetically go back into the past and
allocate impressions to a different agent for the purpose of seeing whether a user would
have clicked on that agent’s advertisement. Such counterfactual information is typically impossible to obtain in an online setting.
Babaioff et al. [2014] focus on welfare maximization. Using the above characterization, they prove that any deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanism must incur regret Ω(T 2/3 ), whereas MAB algorithms for the same setting can achieve regret
O(T 1/2 ). Devanur and Kakade [2009] consider revenue maximization, and derive a
similar Ω(T 2/3 ) lower bound on loss of revenue compared to the VCG payments.3
Dynamic auctions [Athey and Segal 2013; Bergemann and Välimäki 2010;
Bergemann and Said 2011] constitute another setting in which information is
revealed “dynamically” (over time). However, while in MAB auctions all information
from the agents (the bids) is submitted only once and then information is revealed
to the mechanism by the environment over time, in dynamic auctions the agents
continuously observe private “signals” from the environment and submit “actions”
to the mechanism. Accordingly, providing the right incentives becomes much more
challenging. On the other hand, existing work has focused on a fully Bayesian setting
with known priors on the signals, whereas all of our results do not rely on priors.
Finally, several recent papers have explored the theme of reductions in algorithmic mechanism design. Unlike our work which requires mechanisms to be truthful
for every realization of the agents’ types, these papers focus on Bayesian settings and
adopt Bayesian incentive-compatibility as their solution concept. A reduction converting any allocation rule into a Bayesian incentive-compatible mechanism with approx3 For
revenue-maximizing MAB mechanisms, there is no clear comparison with the performance of MAB
algorithms.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:7
imately the same expected social welfare was developed in [Hartline and Lucier 2010;
Bei and Huang 2011; Hartline et al. 2011]. Chawla et al. [2012] considered black-box
reductions of mechanism design problems to algorithmic problems with the same objective, and demonstrated significant limitations of this approach. The breakthrough
results of Cai et al. [2012; 2013a; 2013b] and Daskalakis and Weinberg [2014] circumvented these limitations by instead reducing to algorithmic problems with a modified
objective. In particular, reductions from revenue-maximizing mechanisms to welfaremaximizing algorithms are presented in [Cai et al. 2012, 2013a], whereas Cai et al.
[2013b] and Daskalakis and Weinberg [2014] present reductions for non-linear objective functions, such as makespan in scheduling.4
2.1. Follow-up work (subsequent to [Babaioff et al. 2010])
Our generic transformation exhibits high variability in payments, and includes an
explicit tradeoff between the variability in payments and the loss in performance.
Formally, variability can be expressed as variance, maximal absolute value, or (for
positive types) maximal rebate. Performance can be expressed as welfare or revenue.
Wilkens and Sivan [2012] have proved this tradeoff to be optimal in a certain worstcase sense: our transformation achieves the optimal worst-case variance in payments
for any given worst-case loss in performance, where the worst case is over all monotone
allocation rules. Their result applies to any single-parameter domain and any of the
above notions of variability and performance.
Our generic transformation is likely to be very useful in single-parameter settings
which exhibit the “informational obstacle” (insufficient observable information) such
as the one found for deterministic MAB mechanisms. The follow-up work describes
three additional settings. First, Wilkens and Sivan [2012] observe that the same obstacle arises in offline pay-per-click ad auctions with multiple ad slots, where the
CTRs have slot-specific multipliers. In conjunction with our generic transformation,
an obvious welfare-maximizing allocation rule for that setting results in a truthfulin-expectation mechanism. Second, Shnayder et al. [2012] describe a packet scheduling problem in a network router, where the “informational obstacle” arises due to the
potentially missing information about packet arrival times. (As they observe, this information may be missing not only because it is not observed by the router but also
because the router simply does not have space to store it.) They design a monotone
allocation rule for their setting, and use our generic transformation to convert it to a
truthful-in-expectation mechanism. Third, Gatti et al. [2012] consider an extension of
MAB mechanisms to multiple ad slots. While they provide truthful mechanisms based
on the simple MAB mechanism from [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009],
our generic transformation could give rise to more efficient truthful mechanisms.
Wilkens and Sivan [2012] obtain a similar “single-call reduction” (i.e., a reduction from allocation rules to truthful-in-expectation mechanisms which calls the allocation rule only once) for multi-parameter allocation rules that are maximal-indistributional-range (MIDR). MIDR allocation rules [Dobzinski and Dughmi 2009]
pick a welfare-maximizing distribution over outcomes from some fixed collection of
distributions; they are precisely the allocation rules for which VCG payments produce
a truthful mechanism. This result is an independent work with respect to, and a special case of, the multi-parameter reduction in Section 8.
The multi-parameter generic transformation in Section 8 has been used in two recent papers. First, Jain et al. [2011] used it to speed up the payment computation for
a mechanism that allocates batch jobs in a cloud system. Second, Huang and Kannan
4 All
papers discussed in this paragraph, except [Hartline and Lucier 2010], have appeared after the conference publication of this paper [Babaioff et al. 2010].
0:8
M. Babaioff et al.
[2012] used it to compute payments for their privacy-preserving procurement auction
for spanning trees, which is based on the well-known “exponential privacy mechanism”
from prior work [McSherry and Talwar 2007].
Simplified payment computation. Our generic transformation is most useful if
the allocation rule cannot be invoked more than once, as in “bandit mechanisms” or
other examples provided in follow-up work. Segal [2010] has observed that any truthful single-parameter mechanism can be implemented in a much simpler way, as long
as two calls to the allocation rule are allowed: one computes the allocation, and the
other one generates random payments with the correct expectation. In the first call one
uses the original bids. For the second call, one selects an agent uniformly at random,
and uses the random sampling trick from Archer and Tardos [2001] described above to
compute the payment for this agent, and then scales the payment appropriately.5
Also, a simpler generic transformation is possible if one settles for a weaker notion
of Bayesian incentive-compatibility [Hartline 2012].
3. PRELIMINARIES
Single-parameter domains. We present the single parameter model for which we
apply our procedure. The model is very similar to the model of Archer and Tardos [Archer and Tardos 2001], yet it is slightly more general. We state the model is
terms of values and not costs and allow the values to be both positive and negative. We
also allow randomization by nature. All these changes are minor and do not change
the fundamental characterization, yet are helpful to later derive our results.
Let n be the number of agents and let N = [n] be the set of agents. Each agent
i ∈ N has some private type consisting of a single parameter xi ∈ Ti that describes the
agent, and is known only to i, everything else is public knowledge. We assume that the
domain Ti is an open subset of R which is an interval with positive length (possibly
starting from −∞ or going up to ∞). Let T = T1 × T2 × ... × Tn denote the domain of
types and let t ∈ T denote the vector of true types.
There is some set of outcomes O. For single-parameter domains, agents evaluate
outcomes in a particular way that we describe next. For each agent i ∈ N there is a
function ai : O → R+ specifying the allocation to agent i. The value of an outcome o ∈ O
for an agent i ∈ N with type xi is xi · ai (o). The utility that agent i ∈ N derives from
outcome o ∈ O when he is charged pi is quasi-linear: ui = xi · ai (o) − pi .
For instance, consider the allocation of k identical units of good to agents with additive valuations: agent i has a value of xi per unit. An outcome o specifies how many
items each agent receives: ai (o) is the number of items i receives. His valuation for
that outcome is his value per-unit times the number of units he receives.
A (direct revelation) deterministic mechanism M consists of the pair (A, P), where
A : T → O is the allocation rule and P : T → Rn is the payment rule, i.e. the vector
of payment functions Pi : T → R for each agent i. Each agent is required to report a
type bi ∈ Ti to the mechanism, and bi is called the bid of agent i. We denote the vector
of bids by b ∈ T . The mechanism picks an outcome A(b) and charges agent i payment
of Pi (b). The allocation for agent i when the bids are b is Ai (b) = ai (A(b)) and he is
charged Pi (b). Agent i’s utility when the agents bid b ∈ T and his type is xi ∈ Ti is
ui (xi , b) = xi · Ai (b) − Pi (b)
5 However,
(1)
more work is needed for domains with negative agents’ types, such as VCG shortest path auctions
(see Section 6 for more details). In particular, one needs to carefully define the random sampling of the bid
for payment computation, using a version of the argument in Section 5.2 to bound the loss in welfare.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:9
We also consider randomized mechanisms, which are distributions over deterministic mechanisms. For a randomized allocation rule Ai (b) and Pi (b) will denote the
expected allocation and payment charged from agent i, when the bids are b. The expectation is taken over the randomness of the mechanism. Sometimes it will be helpful
to explicitly consider the deterministic allocation and payment that is generated for
specific random seed. in this case we use w to denote the random seed and use Ai (b; w)
and Pi (b; w) to denote allocation and payment when the seed is w.
There may be some outside randomization that influences the outcome and is not
controlled by the mechanism, e.g. randomness in the realization of clicks in sponsored
search auction. We call this randomization by nature. With such randomization Ai (b)
and Pi (b) also encapsulate expectations over nature’s randomization. Finally, we use
the notation Ai (b; w, r) and Pi (b; w, r) to denote the allocation and payment charged
from agent i, when the bids are b, the mechanism random seed is w and nature’s random seed is r.
Allocation and Mechanism Properties. Let b−i denote the vector of bids of all
agents but agent i. We can now write the vector of bids as b = (b−i , bi ). Similar notation will be used for other vectors.
We next list two central properties, truthfulness and individual rationality.
— Mechanism M is truthful if for every agent i truthful bidding is a dominant strategy:
for every agent i, bidding xi always maximizes her utility, regardless of what the
other agents bid. Formally,
xi · Ai (b−i , xi ) − Pi (b−i , xi ) ≥ xi · Ai (b) − Pi (b)
(2)
xi · Ai (b−i , xi ) − Pi (b−i , xi ) ≥ 0
(3)
holds for every agent i ∈ N , type xi ∈ Ti , bids of others b−i ∈ T−i and bid bi ∈ Ti of
agent i.
— Mechanism M is individually rational (IR) if an agent never receives negative utility
by participating in the mechanism and bidding truthfully. Formally,
holds for every agent i ∈ N , type xi ∈ Ti and bids of others b−i ∈ T−i .
It will be helpful to establish terminology for the case that the above hold not only
in expectation but also for specific realizations. For example, we will say that a mechanism is universally truthful if Equation (2) holds not only in expectation over the
mechanism’s randomness, but rather for every realization of that randomness. In general, every property that we define is defined by some inequality, and if the inequality
holds for every realization of the mechanism randomness we say that it holds universally, and if it holds for every realization of nature randomness we say that it holds
ex-post. When we want to emphasize that the property holds only in expectation over
the nature’s randomness we say that it holds stochastically.
Note that in an individually rational mechanism an agent is ensured not to incur
any loss in expectation. That is rather unsatisfying as for some realizations the agent
might suffer a huge loss. It is more desirable to design mechanisms that are universally
ex-post individually rational, that is a truthful agent should incur no loss for every bids
of the others and every realization of the random events (not only in expectation).
If all types are positive, then in addition to individual rationality it is desirable
that all agents are charged a non-negative amount; this is known as the no-positivetransfers property.
Finally, the welfare of a truthful mechanism is defined to be the
P
total utility i xi · Ai (t).
Characterization. The following characterization of truthful mechanisms, due to
Archer and Tardos [Archer and Tardos 2001], is almost identical to the characteriza-
0:10
M. Babaioff et al.
tion presented by Myerson [Myerson 1981] for truthful mechanisms in the special case
of single item auctions. The crucial property of an allocation that yields truthfulness
is monotonicity, defined as follows:
Definition 3.1. Allocation rule A is monotone if for every agent i ∈ N , bids b−i ∈ T−i
−
and two possible bids of i, bi ≥ b−
i , we have Ai (b−i , bi ) ≥ Ai (b−i , bi ).
Recall that monotonicity of an allocation rule is also defined universally and/or ex-post.
We next present the characterization of truthful mechanisms. In the theorem statement, the expression Ai (b−i , u) is interpreted to equal zero when u 6∈ Ti .
T HEOREM 3.2. [Myerson 1981; Archer and Tardos 2001] Consider an arbitrary
single-parameter domain. An allocation rule A admits a payment rule P such that
the mechanism (A, P) is truthful if and only if A is monotone and moreover for each
R bi
agent i and bid vector b it holds that −∞
Ai (b−i , u) du < ∞. In this case the payment
Pi (b) for each agent i must satisfy
R bi
Pi (b) = Pi0 (b−i ) + bi Ai (b−i , bi ) − −∞
Ai (b−i , u) du,
(4)
where Pi0 (b−i ) does not depend on bi .
A mechanism is called normalized if for each agent i and every bid vector b, zero
allocation implies a zero payment: Ai (b) = 0 ⇒ Pi (b) = 0.
C OROLLARY 3.3. The truthful mechanism in Theorem 3.2 is normalized if and
only if Pi0 (b−i ) ≡ 0, in which case the mechanism is also individually rational and
for positive-only types (T ⊂ Rn+ ) it moreover satisfies the no-positive-transfers property.
Both Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.3 hold in the “ex-post” sense (resp., “universal”
sense), if Ai , Pi and Pi0 (b−i ) are interpreted to mean their respective values for a specific random seed of nature (resp., mechanism). In Corollary 3.3, the mechanism is
normalized in the same sense as it is truthful.
4. THE GENERIC TRANSFORMATION FOR SINGLE-PARAMETER DOMAINS
This section presents a generic procedure which takes any monotone allocation rule for
a single-parameter domain and creates a randomized truthful-in-expectation mechanism which attains the same outcome as the original allocation rule with high probability. The resulting mechanism uses the allocation rule as a “black box,” calls it only
once, and allocates according to the this call. Henceforth, we will refer to this procedure
as the generic transformation.
Our main result — the existence of the generic transformation with the desired
properties — can be stated informally as follows.
T HEOREM 4.1 (I NFORMAL ). Consider an arbitrary single-parameter domain with
n agents. Let A be a monotone allocation rule for this domain. Then for each µ ∈ [0, 1]
e P)
e with the following properties:
there exists a truthful mechanism M = (A,
— M executes a single call to A(b̃) to compute the allocation, with a pre-processing step to
compute the modified bid vector b̃, and a post-processing step to compute the payments.
Both pre- and post-processing steps take O(n) time and do not depend on A.
e and A(b)
— For any bid vector b and any fixed random seed of nature allocations A(b)
are identical with probability at least 1 − nµ.
— M is universally ex-post individually rational. If all types are positive, then M is
ex-post no-positive-transfers, and never pays any agent i more than bi · Ai (x) · ( µ1 − 1).
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:11
Presenting the formal version of this result (Theorem 4.5) requires defining the
generic transformation. We begin with an informal description thereof. As evidenced
by Equation (4), the payment for agent i is a difference of two terms: the agent’s reported utility (i.e., the product of her bid and her allocation), minus the integral of the
allocation assigned to every smaller bid value. We charge the agent for her reported
utility, and we give her a random rebate whose expectation equals the required integral. When integrating a function over a finite interval, an unbiased estimator of the
integral can be obtained by sampling a uniformly random point of that interval and
evaluating the function at the sampled point. This idea was applied, in the context
of mechanism design, by Archer et al. [2004]. Below, we show how to generalize the
transformation to allow for integrals over unbounded intervals, as required by Equation (4). Using this transformation it is easy to transform any monotone allocation rule
into a randomized mechanism that is truthful in expectation and only evaluates the
allocation rule n + 1 times: once to determine the actual allocation, and once more per
agent to obtain an unbiased estimate of that agent’s payment.
Our main innovation is a transformation that uses the same random sampling trick,
but only needs to evaluate the allocation rule once during the entire mechanism. (In
other words, it does not require additional calls to the allocation rule to compute the
payments.) Assume that a parameter µ ∈ (0, 1) is given. For every player, with probability 1 − µ, we leave their bid unchanged; with probability µ, we sample a smaller
bid value. The allocation rule is invoked on these bids. An agent is always charged her
reported value of the outcome, but if her bid was replaced with a smaller bid value
then we refund her an amount equal to an unbiased estimator of the integral in Equation (4), scaled by 1/µ to counterbalance the fact that the refund is only being applied
with probability µ. A naı̈ve application of this plan suffers from the following defect:
the random resampling of bids modifies the expected allocation vector, so we need to
obtain an unbiased estimator of the integral of the modified allocation rule. However,
if we change our sampling procedure to obtain such an estimate, then this modifies
the allocation rule once again, so we will still be estimating the wrong integral! What
we need is a “fixed point” of this process of redefining the sampling procedure. Below,
we give a definition of self-resampling procedures that satisfy the requisite fixed point
property, and we give two simple constructions of self-resampling procedures.
A self-resampling procedure transforms the bid bi of a given agent i bid into two
correlated random values (xi , yi ), where xi is the modified bid presented to the original allocation rule, and yi is used (together with the allocation itself) in computing
the payment for this agent. More specifically, yi is needed to correctly normalize the
unbiased estimator of the integral in Equation (4) for the modified allocation rule,
according to Theorem 4.2 below. For agents with positive types we define a simpler
self-resampling procedure for which the unbiased estimator does not depend on yi ,
and therefore, strictly speaking, the procedure only needs to output xi (more details
can be found in Section 4.5). However, we explicitly return the yi even for the positive
types so as to be consistent with the general definitions and (perhaps more importantly) because we use it to define self-resampling procedures with general support
(see Section 4.4).
Thus, the formal description of our generic transformation consists of three parts:
(1) a method for estimating integrals by evaluating the integrand at a randomly sampled point,
(2) the definition and construction of self-resampling procedures,
(3) the generic transformation that uses the previous two ingredients to convert any
monotone allocation rule into a truthful-in-expectation randomized mechanism.
We now specify the details of each of these three parts.
0:12
M. Babaioff et al.
4.1. Estimating integrals via random sampling
Let I be a nonempty open interval in R (possibly with infinite endpoints) and let g
be
R a function defined on I. Let us describe a procedure for estimating the integral
g(z) dz by evaluating g at a single randomly sampled point of I. The procedure is
I
well known; we describe it here for the purpose of giving a self-contained exposition of
our algorithm.
T HEOREM 4.2. Let F : I → [0, 1] be any strictly increasing function that is differentiable and satisfies inf z∈I F (z) = 0 and supz∈I F (z) = 1. If Y is a random variable with
cumulative distribution function F , then
Z
g(Y )
.
g(z) dz = E
F ′ (Y )
I
P ROOF. Since inf z∈I F (z) = 0 and supz∈I F (z) = 1, it follows that the random variable Y is supported on the entire interval I. Our assumption that F is differentiable
implies that Y has a probability density function,
namely F ′ (z). Thus, for any funcR
′
tion h, the expectation of h(Y ) is given by I h(z)F (z) dz. Applying this formula to the
function h(z) = g(z)/F ′ (z) one obtains the theorem.
4.2. Self-resampling procedures
The basic ingredient of our generic transformation is a procedure for taking a bid bi and
a random seed wi , and producing two random numbers xi (bi ; wi ), yi (bi ; wi ). The mechanism will use {xi (bi ; wi )}i∈N for determining the allocation and additionally yi (bi ; wi )
for determining the payment it charges agent i. To prove that the mechanism is truthful in expectation we will require the following properties.6
Definition 4.3. Let I be a nonempty interval in R. A self-resampling procedure
with support I and resampling probability µ ∈ (0, 1) is a randomized algorithm with
input bi ∈ I, random seed wi , and output xi (bi ; wi ), yi (bi ; wi ) ∈ I, that satisfies the
following properties:
(1) For every fixed wi , xi (bi ; wi ) and yi (bi ; wi ) are non-decreasing functions of bi .
(2) With probability 1 − µ, xi (bi ; wi ) = yi (bi ; wi ) = bi . Otherwise xi (bi ; wi ) ≤ yi (bi ; wi ) <
bi .
(3) The conditional distribution of xi (bi ; wi ), given that yi (bi ; wi ) = b′i < bi , is the same
as the unconditional distribution of xi (b′i ; wi ). In other words,
Pr[ xi (bi ; wi ) < ai | yi (bi ; wi ) = b′i ] = Pr[ x(b′i ; wi ) < ai ], ∀ai ≤ b′i < bi .
(4) Consider the two-variable function
F (ai , bi ) = Pr[yi (bi ; wi ) < ai | yi (bi ; wi ) < bi ],
which we will call the distribution function of the self-resampling procedure. For
each bi , the function F (·, bi ) must be differentiable and strictly increasing on the
interval I ∩ (−∞, bi ).
As it happens, it is easier to construct self-resampling procedures with support R+ ,
and one such construction that we call the canonical self-resampling procedure (Algorithm 1) forms the basis for our general construction. We defer the discussion of
self-resampling procedures with general support until after we have described and
analyzed the generic transformation.
6 To
keep the notation consistent, we state Definition 4.3 for a given agent i. Strictly speaking, the subscript
i is not necessary.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:13
Algorithm 1: The canonical self-resampling procedure.
1: Input: bid bi ∈ [0, ∞), parameter µ ∈ (0, 1).
2: Output: (xi , yi ) such that 0 ≤ xi ≤ yi ≤ bi .
3: with probability 1 − µ
4:
xi ← bi , yi ← bi .
5: else
6:
Pick b′i ∈ [0, bi ] uniformly at random.
7:
xi ← Recursive(b′i ), yi ← b′i .
8:
9:
10:
11:
12:
13:
function Recursive(bi )
with probability 1 − µ
return bi .
else
Pick b′i ∈ [0, bi ] uniformly at random.
return Recursive(b′i ).
P ROPOSITION 4.4. Algorithm 1 is a self-resampling procedure with support R+
and resampling probability µ. The distribution function for this procedure is F (ai , bi ) =
ai /bi .
P ROOF. Properties 1 and 2 in Definition 4.3 are immediate from the description of
the algorithm. The random seed wi for the algorithm can be defined as a countably
infinite sequence of real numbers drawn independently and uniformly at random from
[0, 1] interval. Then in order pick a random number in some range [0, r], the algorithm
takes the next number in this sequence and multiplies it by r.
Property 3 follows from the recursive nature of the sampling procedure: the event
yi (bi ; wi ) = b′i < bi implies that the algorithm has followed the “else” branch on Line 5,
and has chosen b′i in Line 6. Finally, the distribution function is F (ai , bi ) = ai /bi since
conditional on the event yi (bi ; wi ) < bi , the distribution of yi (bi ; wi ) is uniform in the
interval [0, bi ]. Property 4 follows trivially.
4.3. The generic transformation
Suppose we are given a monotone allocation rule A and for each agent i ∈ N a
self-resampling procedure that has resampling probability µ ∈ (0, 1), support Ti ,
and output values fi = (xi , yi ). Let Fi (ai , bi ) denote the distribution function of the
self-resampling procedure for agent i, and let Fi′ (ai , bi ) denote the partial derivative
∂Fi (ai ,bi )
. Our generic transformation combines these ingredients into a randomized
∂ai
mechanism M = AllocToMech(A, µ, f ) that works as follows:
If A itself is randomized or if there is randomness arising from nature, then we
allocate according to A(x; w, r) and we assume that the algorithm’s random seed w
and the nature’s random seed r are independent of the random seeds wi used in the
resampling step.
We are now ready to present our main result:
T HEOREM 4.5. Consider an arbitrary single-parameter domain. Let A be a monotone allocation rule. Suppose we are given an ensemble f of self-resampling procedures
fi = (xi , yi ) for each agent i, each with resampling probability µ ∈ (0, 1). Then the
e P)
e = AllocToMech(A, µ, f ) has the following properties.
mechanism M = (A,
(a) M is truthful, universally ex-post individually rational,
0:14
M. Babaioff et al.
Mechanism 2: Generic transformation M = AllocToMech(A, µ, f )
1: Solicit bid vector b ∈ T .
2: Execute each agent’s self-resampling procedure using an independent random
seed wi , to obtain two vectors of modified bids
x = (x1 (b1 ; w1 ) , . . . , xn (bn ; wn )),
y = (y1 (b1 ; w1 ) , . . . , yn (bn ; wn )).
3:
4:
Allocate according to A(x).
Each agent i is charged the amount bi · Ai (x) − Ri , where Ri is the rebate
(
1
i (x)
· A
if yi < bi ,
′
Ri = µ Fi (yi ,bi )
0
otherwise.
(5)
(b) For n agents and any bid vector b (and any fixed random seed of nature) allocations
e and A(b) are identical with probability at least 1 − nµ.
A(b)
(c) If T = Rn+ (all types are positive), and each fi is the canonical self-resampling procedure, then mechanism M is ex-post no-positive-transfers, and never pays any agent i
more than bi · Ai (x) · ( µ1 − 1).
Several remarks are in order.
— The mechanism never explicitly computes the payment for each agent i (Equation (4)) but rather implicitly creates the correct expected payments through its
randomization of the bids.
— The mechanism only invokes the original allocation rule A once. This property is
very useful when it is impossible to invoke the allocation rule more than once, e.g.
for multi-armed bandit allocations.
— The mechanism M is randomized even if A is deterministic. It is truthful in expectation over the randomness used by the self-resampling procedures.
— If A is ex-post monotone, then M will be ex-post truthful. To see this, fix nature’s
random seed r and apply Theorem 4.5 to the allocation rule Ar induced by this r.
— If agents’ types are positive then by part (b), the welfare of M is at least 1 − nµ times
that of A. Further results on bounding the welfare loss are presented in Section 5.
— By definition of the payment rule, the mechanism is universally ex-post normalized.
We will not explicitly mention this property in the subsequent applications.
Parameter µ controls the trade-off between the loss in welfare and the variance in
payments, as quantified by the rebate size Ri . If µ is very small and the mechanism
issues rebate(s), then its revenue may be very low and possibly negative. However, this
risk may be mitigated if the auction maker runs many independent auctions, as may
be the case in practice. Further, the follow-up paper [Wilkens and Sivan 2012] proves
that our welfare vs. variance trade-off is optimal.
P ROOF OF T HEOREM 4.5. We start with some notation. Aei (b−i , bi ; q) denotes the allocation for agent i given the bid vector b = (b−i , bi ) and the combined random seed
q = (w1 , . . . , wn , w, r). When we write Aei (b−i , u) without indicating the dependence on
the q, we are referring to the unconditional expectation of Aei (b−i , u; q) over q.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:15
To prove that M is truthful, we need to prove two things: that the randomized alloe satisfies
cation rule Ae is monotone, and that the expected payment rule P
R
ei (b) = bi Aei (b−i , bi ) − bi Aei (b−i , u) du.
(6)
P
−∞
The monotonicity of randomized allocation rule Ae follows from the monotonicity of
A and the monotonicity property 1 in the definition of a self-resampling procedure. To
ei satisfies Equation (6), we begin by recalling that the payment charged to
prove that P
player i is bi Ai (x) − Ri , where the rebate Ri is defined by Equation (5). The expectation
of bi Ai (x) is simply bi Aei (b−i , bi ), so to conclude the proof of truthfulness we must show
that
Rb
E[Ri ] = i Aei (b−i , u) du.
(7)
−∞
Our proof of Equation (7) begins by observing that the conditional distribution of xi ,
given that yi = u < bi , is the same as the unconditional distribution of xi (u; wi ), by
Property 3 of a self-resampling procedure. Combining this with the fact that the random seed wi is independent of {wj : j 6= i}, we find that the conditional distribution of
the tuple x = (x−i , xi ), given that yi = u, is the same as the unconditional distribution
of the vector x̂ of modified bids that M would input into the allocation rule A if the
bid vector were (b−i , u) instead of (b−i , bi ). Taking expectations, this implies that for all
e −i , u).
u < bi , we have E[Ai (x) | yi = u] = E[Ai (x̂)] = A(b
Now apply Theorem 4.2 with the function g(u) = Aei (b−i , u). Recalling that Fi (·, bi ) is
the cumulative distribution function of yi given that yi < bi , we apply the theorem to
obtain
"
#
Z bi
ei (b−i , yi )
A
Ai (x)
e
Ai (b−i , u) du = E
yi < bi = E
yi < bi
Fi′ (yi , bi )
Fi′ (yi , bi )
−∞
= µ · E[Ri | yi < bi ],
(8)
where the second equation follows from the equation derived at the end of the preceding paragraph, averaging over all u < bi . Observing that Ri = 0 unless yi < bi ,
an event that has probability µ, we see that E[Ri ] = µ · E[Ri | yi < bi ]. Combined with
Equation (8), this establishes Equation (7) and completes the proof that M is truthful.
Mechanism M is universally ex-post individually rational because agent i is never
charged an amount greater than bi Aei (b; q). Part (b) follows from the union bound:
the probability that xi = bi for all i is at least 1 − nµ. For part (c), note that by
Proposition 4.4, the canonical self-resampling procedure has distribution function
F (ai , bi ) = ai /bi , hence Fi′ (yi , bi ) = 1/bi , for all i, yi , bi . The rebate Ri is equal either
i (x)
to 0 or to µ1 · F A
= bi · Ai (x) · µ1 . We also charge bi · Ai (x) to agent i. The claimed
′
i (yi ,bi )
upper bound on the amount paid to agent i follows by combining these two terms.
4.4. Self-resampling procedures with general support
To construct a self-resampling procedure with support in an arbitrary interval I, we
can use the following technique. Suppose h : (0, 1] × I → I is a two-variable function
such that the partial derivatives ∂h(zi , bi )/∂zi and ∂h(zi , bi )/∂bi are well-defined and
strictly positive at every point (zi , bi ) ∈ (0, 1] × I. Suppose furthermore that h(1, bi ) = bi
and inf zi ∈(0,1] {h(zi , bi )} = inf(I) for all bi ∈ I. Then we define the h-canonical selfresampling procedure (xhi , yih ) with support I, by specifying that
h
xi (bi ; wi ) = h(xi (1; wi ), bi )
(9)
yih (bi ; wi ) = h(yi (1; wi ), bi ),
0:16
M. Babaioff et al.
where (xi , yi ) is the canonical self-resampling procedure as defined in Algorithm 1.
P ROPOSITION 4.6. (xhi , yih ) as defined in Equation (9) is a self-resampling procedure with support I and resampling probability µ. The distribution function for (xhi , yih )
is the unique two-variable function F (ai , bi ) such that
h(F (ai , bi ), bi ) = ai
for all ai , bi ∈ I, ai < bi .
(10)
P ROOF. Property 1 in Definition 4.3 holds because of the monotonicity of h, Property 2 holds because h(1, bi ) = bi for all bi , and Property 3 holds because the function h
is deterministic and monotone.
Let Fh (ai , bi ) and F0 (ai , bi ) be the distribution functions for the h-canonical and
canonical self-resampling procedures, respectively. Recall that F0 (ai , bi ) = ai /bi by
Proposition 4.4. Note that F (ai , bi ) in Equation (10) is unique (and hence well-defined)
by the strict monotonicity of h.
The claim that Fh (ai , bi ) = F (ai , bi ) easily follows from in Equation (9). By definition
of h we have
h(yi (1, wi ), bi ) < bi ⇐⇒ yi (1, wi ) < 1.
Therefore, letting yi = yi (1, wi ) we have
Fh (ai , bi ) , Pr[h(yi , bi ) < ai | h(yi , bi ) < bi ]
= Pr[yi < F (ai , bi ) | yi < 1]
= F0 ( F (ai , bi ) , 1)
= F (ai , bi ).
Our assumption that h is differentiable and strictly increasing in its first argument
now implies that the same property holds for F , which verifies Property 4.
4.5. A simplified generic transformation for positive types
We focus on the important special case of positive types, and present Mechanism 3, a
simplified version of the generic transformation (Mechanism 2), for this case.
Mechanism 3: A simplified generic transformation for positive types.
1: Parameter: resampling probability µ ∈ (0, 1).
2:
3:
4:
5:
6:
7:
8:
Collect bid vector b ∈ (0, ∞)n .
Independently for each agent i ∈ [n]:
Sample: γi uniformly at random from [0, 1]
1/(1−µ)
.
Set χi = 1 with probability 1 − µ and otherwise χi = γi
Construct the vector of modified bids x = (x1 , . . . , xn ), where xi = χi bi .
Allocate according to A(x).
(
1
if χi = 1,
For each agent i, assign payment bi · Ai (x) ·
.
1
1 − µ if χi < 1
We prove that Mechanism 3 is equivalent to the generic transformation (Mechanism 2) with a canonical self-resampling procedure (Algorithm 1).
P ROPOSITION 4.7. The allocation and payments in Mechanism 3 coincide with
those in Mechanism 2 with a canonical self-resampling procedure.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:17
To prove Proposition 4.7, we provide a non-recursive version of the canonical selfresampling procedure (Algorithm 1), which we call O NE S HOT . We argue that the output of Mechanism 3 is identical to the output of the mechanism obtained by plugging
O NE S HOT into Mechanism 2.7 O NE S HOT is also essential for the analysis in Section 5.
Algorithm 4: O NE S HOT : a non-recursive version of Algorithm 1.
1: Input: bid bi ∈ [0, ∞), parameter µ ∈ (0, 1).
2: Output: (xi , yi ) such that 0 ≤ xi ≤ yi ≤ bi .
3: with probability 1 − µ
4:
xi ← bi , yi ← bi .
5: else
6:
Pick γ1 , γ2 ∈ [0, 1] indep., uniformly at random.
1/(1−µ)
1/(1−µ)
1/µ
7:
xi ← bi · γ1
, yi ← bi · max{γ1
, γ2 }.
P ROPOSITION 4.8. Algorithm 1 and O NE S HOT generate the same output distribution: for any bid bi ∈ [0, ∞), the joint distribution of the pair
(xi , yi ) = (xi (bi ; wi ), yi (bi ; wi ))
is the same for both procedures. (Here wi denotes the random seed for each agent i.)
The proof of Proposition 4.8 can be found in the Appendix.
P ROOF OF P ROPOSITION 4.7. By Proposition 4.8, it suffices to compare Mechanism 3 to Mechanism 2 with self-resampling procedure O NE S HOT. To show that the
two mechanisms are equivalent, we must show that they yield the same distribution
over allocations and the same payments. First we argue about the allocations. In both
mechanisms, each bidder’s bid bi is independently transformed into a random xi , and
then the allocation rule A is applied to the vector x = (x1 , . . . , xn ). Furthermore, the
conditional distribution of xi given bi is the same in both cases: xi = bi with probability
1 − µ, and otherwise xi = bi · γ 1/(1−µ) where γ is uniformly distributed in [0, 1]. Hence,
the two mechanisms yield the same distribution over allocations.
To see that the payment rules are the same, consider the distribution function of
O NE S HOT, as defined in Definition 4.3:
F (ai , bi ) = Pr[yi (bi ; wi ) < ai | yi (bi ; wi ) < bi ].
By Proposition 4.8, Fi (ai , bi ) is also the distribution function for Algorithm 1. By Proposition 4.4 we have F (ai , bi ) = ai /bi , and consequently
Fi′ (ai , bi ) ,
∂Fi (ai , bi )
1
= .
∂ai
bi
In particular, neither allocation nor payments in this mechanism depend on the yi ’s.
Suppressing the yi ’s from mechanism M and plugging in Fi′ (yi , bi ) = b1i , we obtain
Mechanism 3. This completes the proof of Proposition 4.7.
7 This
observation is due to [Shnayder et al. 2012].
0:18
M. Babaioff et al.
5. IMPROVED BOUNDS ON WELFARE
We present improved bounds on the welfare obtained by our generic transformation.
We consider two interesting special cases when the agents’ private types are, respectively, always positive and always negative. In the second case, agents are contractors
who incur costs and get paid by the mechanism; one such example is a shortest paths
mechanism considered in Section 6.
We consider the approximation that is achieved by the mechanism as a function of
the approximation of the original allocation rule. Recall that our generic transformation creates a mechanism with an allocation that is identical to the original allocation
with probability at least 1 − nµ. For positive types this immediately implies a bound on
the approximation which degrades with n, the number of agents. (For negative types
such bound does not immediately follow since the cost in the low probability event
might be prohibitively high.) For both settings, we present a similar bound that does
not degrade with n.
5.1. Positive private types
Assume that the agents’ types are always positive, more specifically that the type
space is T = (0, ∞)n . Recall that for P
agents’ types t ∈ T the social welfare of
an outcome o is defined to SW(o, t) =
i∈N ti ai (o). The optimal social welfare is
OPT(t) = maxo∈O SW(o, t), where O is the set of all feasible outcomes. (A mechanism
with) an allocation rule A is α-approximate if it holds that
α · E[SW(A(t), t)] ≥ OPT(t) for every t.
(11)
n
T HEOREM 5.1. Consider the setting in Theorem 4.5(c), so that T = (0, ∞) and each
fi is the canonical self-resampling procedure. If allocation rule A is α-approximate, then
µ
mechanism AllocToMech(A, µ, f ) is α/(1 − 2−µ
)-approximate.
P ROOF. Fix a bid vector b, and let o∗ be the corresponding optimal allocation. Recall
that our mechanism outputs allocation A(x), where x is the vector of randomly modified bids. As the original allocation rule A is α-approximate, by Equation (11) it holds
that α · SW(A(x), x) ≥ OPT(x). We will show that
µ
bi for each agent i.
(12)
E[xi ] = 1 − 2−µ
Thus when we evaluate o∗ with respect to bids x we get:
P
α · SW(A(x), x) ≥ OPT(x) ≥ SW(o∗ , x) = i∈N xi ai (o∗ )
P
∗
α · E[SW(A(x), x)] = E
i∈N xi ai (o )
X
µ
µ
∗
=
bi ai (o ) = 1 −
OPT(b).
1−
2−µ
2−µ
i∈N
It remains to prove Equation (12). Let us use O NE S HOT to describe the canonical
self-resampling procedure. Recall that O NE S HOT generates xi = xi (bi ; wi ) by setting
xi = bi with probability 1 − µ, and otherwise sampling γ1 uniformly at random in [0, 1]
1/(1−µ)
and outputting xi = bi · γ1
. Hence
R1
1/(1−µ)
1
E[xi | xi < bi ] = 0 bi · γ1
dγ1 = bi · 1+ 1 1 = bi · 1 − 2−µ
1−µ
µ
.
E[xi ] = (1 − µ) · bi + µ · E[xi | xi < bi ] = bi · 1 − 2−µ
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:19
For arbitrary self-resampling procedures fi with support R+ , Equation (12) can be
α
replaced by E[xi ] ≥ (1 − µ) bi , which gives a slightly weaker result, namely an 1−µ
approximation to the social welfare.
5.2. Negative private types
Now assume that the agents’ types are always negative, more specifically that T =
(−∞, 0)n . For negative types approximation is defined with respect to the social cost,
which is the negation of the social welfare. An algorithm is α-approximate if for every
input it outputs an outcome with cost at most α times the optimal cost. We present
an approximation bound for an h-canonical self-resampling procedure, for a suitably
chosen h.
T HEOREM 5.2. Consider the setting in Theorem 4.5. Assume that T = (−∞, 0)n
and
√ that each fi is the h-canonical self-resampling procedure, where h(zi , bi ) =
bi / zi . Suppose µ ∈ (0,12 ). If allocation
rule A is α-approximate, then mechanism
µ
AllocToMech(A, µ, f ) is α 1 + 1−2µ -approximate.
The proof of this theorem is almost identical to that of Theorem 5.1, and thus is omitted. The main modification is that Equation (12) is replaced by the following lemma:
L EMMA 5.3. In the setting of Theorem 5.2, letting xh be the vector of modified types,
it holds that
µ
E[xhi ] = bi 1 + 1−2µ
for all i.
P ROOF. Recall that xh is defined by Equation (9). As in the proof of Equation (12),
we will use O NE S HOT to describe the canonical self-resampling procedure. It follows
that
R1
R1
− 1
1
,
E[xhi | xi < bi ] = 0 r bi 1 dγ1 = 0 bi · γ1 2(1−µ) dγ1 = bi · 1− 1 1 = bi · 1 + 1−2µ
(1−µ)
γ1
E[xhi ] = (1 − µ) · bi + µ · E[xhi | xhi < bi ] = bi · 1 +
2(1−µ)
µ
1−2µ
.
6. APPLICATIONS TO OFFLINE MECHANISM DESIGN
The VCG mechanism for shortest paths. The seminal paper Nisan and Ronen
[2001] has presented the following question: is there a computational overhead in computing payments that will induce agents to be truthful, compared to the computation
burden of computing the allocation. One of their examples is the VCG mechanism for
the shortest path mechanism design problem, where a naive computation of VCG payments requires additional computation of n shortest path instances. Yet, an explicit
payment computation is not the real goal, it is just a means to an end. The real goal
is inducing the right incentives. Our procedure shows that without any overhead in
computation, if we move to a randomized allocation rule and settle for truthfulness in
expectation (and a small loss in performance) one can induce the right incentives.
The shortest path mechanism design problem is the following. We are given a graph
G = (V, E) and a pair of source-target nodes (vs , vt ). Each agent e controls an edge
e ∈ E and has a cost ce > 0 if picked (thus ve = −ce < 0 and Te = (−∞, 0) for every
e). That cost is private information, known only to agent e. The mechanism designer’s
goal is to pick a path P from node vs to node vt in the graph with minimal total cost,
0:20
M. Babaioff et al.
P
that is e∈P ce is minimal. Assume that there is no edge that forms a cut between vs
and vt .
The VCG mechanism is an cost-optimal and truthful mechanism for this problem. It
computes a shortest path P with respect to the reported costs and pays to an agent e
the difference between the cost of the shortest path that does not contains e and the
total cost shortest path excluding the cost of e. A naive implementation of the VCG
mechanism requires computing |P | + 1 shortest path instances (where |P | denotes the
number of edges in path P ). VCG is deterministic, truthful and cost-optimal.
Let EFF an the cost-optimal allocation rule for the shortest path problem. We can
use our general procedure to derive the following result (its proof follows directly from
Theorem 4.5 and Theorem 5.2).
T HEOREM 6.1. Fix any µ ∈ (0, 21 ). For each
agent i, let fi be the h-canonical self√
resampling procedure, where h(zi , bi ) = bi / zi . Let M = AllocToMech(EFF, µ, {fi }) be
the mechanism created by applying AllocToMech() to EFF. Then M has the following
properties:
• It is truthful and universally individually rational.
• It only computes one shortest paths instance.
µ
• It outputs a path with expected length at most 1 + 1−2µ
times the length of the
shortest path.
Recall that parameter µ controls the trade-off between approximation ratio and the
rebate size Ri , which for a given random seed is proportional to µ1 .
Communication overhead of payment computation. Babaioff et al. [2013] show
that there exists a monotone deterministic allocation rule for which the communication required for computing the allocation is factor Ω(n) less than the communication
required to computing prices. This implies that inducing the correct incentives deterministically has a large overhead in communication. Assume that instead of requiring
explicit computation of payments we are satisfied with inducing the correct incentives
using a randomized mechanism. In such case our reduction shows that the deterministic lower bound cannot be extended to randomized mechanisms, if we allow a small
error in the allocation.
More concretely, consider a single parameter domain with types that are positive,
Ti = (0, ∞) (as in [Babaioff et al. 2013]). For all i, use the canonical self-resampling
procedure. Consider any monotone allocation rule A. We can apply Theorem 4.5 to
obtain a randomized mechanism that is truthful and only executes that allocation
rule A once (thus has no communication overhead at all) and has exactly the same
allocation with probability at least (1 − µ)n . For any ǫ > 0 we can find µ > 0 such that
the error probability is less than ǫ.
7. MULTI-ARMED BANDIT MECHANISMS
In this section we apply the main result to multi-armed bandit (MAB) mechanisms:
single-parameter mechanisms in which the allocation rule is (essentially) an MAB algorithm parameterized by the bids. As in any single-parameter mechanism, agents
submit their bids, then the allocation rule is run, and then the payments are assigned.
This application showcases the full power of the main result, since in the MAB setting the allocation rule is only run once, and (in general) cannot be simulated as a
computational routine without actually implementing the allocation.
Focusing on the stochastic setting, we design truthful MAB mechanisms with the
same regret guarantees as the best MAB algorithms such as UCB1 [Auer et al. 2002a].
First, we prove that allocation rules derived from UCB1 and similar MAB algorithms
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:21
are in fact monotone, and hence give rise to truthful MAB mechanisms. Second, we
provide a new allocation rule with the same regret guarantees that is ex-post monotone, and hence gives rise to an ex-post truthful MAB mechanism. Third, we use this
new allocation rule to obtain an unconditional separation between the power of randomized and deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanisms.
7.1. Preliminaries: MAB mechanisms
An MAB mechanism [Babaioff et al. 2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009] operates as follows. There are n agents. Each agent i has a private value vi and submits a bid bi . We
assume that bi , vi ∈ [0, bmax ], where bmax is known a priori. The allocation consists of
T rounds, where T is the time horizon. In each round t the allocation rule chooses one
of the agents, call it i = i(t), and observes a click reward π(t) ∈ [0, 1] for this choice;
the chosen agent i receives vi π(t) units of utility. Payments are assigned after the last
round of the allocation. Note that the social welfare of the mechanism is equal to the
PT
total value-adjusted click reward: t=1 vi(t) π(t).
The special case of 0-1 click rewards corresponds to the scenario in which agents are
advertisers in a pay-per-click auction, and choosing agent i in a given round t means
showing this agent’s ad. Then the click reward π(t) is the click bit: 1 if the ad has been
clicked, and 0 otherwise. Following the web advertising terminology, we will say that
in each round, an impression is allocated to one of the agents.
Formally, an MAB allocation rule A is an online algorithm parameterized by
n, T, bmax and the bids b. In each round it allocates the impression and observes the
click reward. Absent truthfulness constraints, the objective is to maximize the reported
P
welfare: Tt=1 bi(t) π(t). This formulation generalizes MAB algorithms: the latter are
precisely MAB allocation rules with all bids set to 1.
Given an MAB algorithm Â, there is a natural way to transform it into an MAB
allocation rule A. Namely, A runs algorithm  with modified click rewards: if agent
i is chosen in round t then the click reward reported to  is π̂(t) = (bi /bmax ) π(t). We
will say that algorithm  induces allocation rule A. From now on we will identify an
MAB algorithm with the induced allocation rule, e.g. allocation rule UCB1 is induced by
algorithm UCB1 [Auer et al. 2002a].
We will focus on the stochastic MAB setting: in all rounds t in which an agent i is
chosen, the click reward π(t) is an independent random sample from some fixed distribution on [0, 1] with expectation µi .8 Following the web advertisement terminology, we
will call µi the click-through rate (CTR) of agent i. The CTRs are fixed, but no further
information about them (such as priors) is revealed to the mechanism.
Regret. The performance of an MAB allocation rule is quantified in terms of regret:
PT
R(T ; b; µ) , T maxi [ bi µi ] − E[ t=1 bi(t) µi(t) ],
the difference in expected click rewards between the algorithm and the benchmark: the
best agent in hindsight, knowing the µi ’s. We focus on R(T ) , max R(T ; b; µ), where the
maximum is taken over all CTR vectors µ and all bid vectors b such that bi ≤ 1 for all
i. 9
Regret guarantees from the vast literature on MAB algorithms easily translate to MAB
allocation rules. In particular, allocation rule UCB1 has regret
√
R(T ) = O( nT log T ) [Auer et al. 2002a], which is nearly matching the information8 The
exact shape of this distribution is not essential. E.g. in the advertising example π(t) ∈ {0, 1}.
define R(T ) with bmax = 1 merely to simplify the notation. All regret bounds (scaled up by a factor of
bmax ) hold for an arbitrary bmax .
9 We
0:22
M. Babaioff et al.
√
theoretically optimal regret bound Θ( nT ) [Auer et al. 2002b; Audibert and Bubeck
2010]. The stochastic MAB setting tends to be easier if the best agent is much better
than the second-best one. Let us sort the agents so that b1 µ1 ≥ b2 µ2 ≥ . . . ≥ bn µn .
The gap δ of the problem instance is defined as (b1 µ1 − b2 µ2 )/bmax . The δ-gap regret Rδ (T ) is defined as the worst-case regret over all problem instances with gap
δ. Allocation rule UCB1 achieves Rδ (T ) = O( nδ log T ) [Auer et al. 2002a]; there is a
√
lower bound Rδ (T ) = Ω(min( nδ log T, nT )) [Lai and Robbins 1985; Auer et al. 2002b;
Kleinberg et al. 2008a].
Click realizations. A click realization is a n × T table ρ in which the (i, t) entry ρi (t)
is the click reward (e.g., the click bit) that agent i receives if it is played in round t.
Note that in order to fully define the behavior of any algorithm on all bid vectors one
may need to specify all entries in the table, whereas only a subset thereof is revealed
in any given run. We view ρ as a realization of nature’s random seed. Thus, we can now
define ex-post truthfulness and other ex-post properties: informally, ex-post property
is a property that holds for every given click realization.
For each agent i, round t, bid vector b and click realization ρ, let Ati (b; ρ) denote the
probability that MAB allocation rule A allocates the impression at round t to agent i.
(If  is deterministic, the probability Âti (ρ) is trivial: either 0 or 1.)
For MAB algorithm Â, define Âti (ρ) similarly.
7.2. Truthfulness and monotonicity
Theorem 4.5(c) reduces the problem of designing truthful MAB mechanisms to that of
designing monotone MAB allocations. Let us state this reduction explicitly:
T HEOREM 7.1. Consider the stochastic MAB mechanism design problem. Let A be
a stochastically monotone (resp., ex-post monotone) MAB allocation rule. Applying the
transformation in Theorem 4.5(c)10 to A with parameter µ, we obtain a mechanism M
such that:
(a) M is stochastically truthful (resp., ex-post truthful), ex-post no-positivetransfers, and universally ex-post individually rational.
(b) for each click realization, the difference in expected welfare between A and M is at
most µnT bmax .
Note that the theorem provides two distinct types of guarantees: game-theoretic
guarantees in part (a), and performance guarantees in part (b).
We show that a very general class of deterministic MAB algorithms induces monotone MAB allocation rules (to which Theorem 7.1 can be applied).
Definition 7.2. In a given run of an MAB algorithm, the round-t statistics is a pair
of vectors (π, ν), where the i-th component of π (resp., ν) is equal to the total payoff
(resp., the number of impressions) of agent i in rounds 1 to t − 1, for each agent i.
Vectors π and ν are called p-stats vector and i-stats vector, respectively.
Definition 7.3. A deterministic MAB algorithm  is called well-formed if for each
round t and agent i, letting (π, ν) be the round-t statistics, the following properties
hold:
— [Âti (ρ) is determined by (π, ν)] there is a function χi (π; ν) that depends only on the
round-t statistics such that Âti (ρ) = χi (π; ν) for any click realization ρ and all t.
— [χ-monotonicity] χi (π; ν) is non-decreasing in πi for any fixed (π−i , ν).
10 Theorem
4.5(c) is stated for the type space T = (0, ∞)n , but it trivially extends to the case T = (0, bmax )n .
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:23
— [χ-IIA] for each round t, any three distinct agents {i, j, l} and any fixed (π−i , ν−i ),
changing (πi , νi ) cannot transfer an impression from j to l.
The χ-IIA property above is reminiscent of Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives
(IIA) property in the Social Choice literature (hence the name). A similar but technically different property is essential in the analysis of deterministic MAB allocation
rules in [Babaioff et al. 2014].
Remark 7.4. For a concrete example of a well-formed MAB algorithm, consider (a
version of) UCB1.11 The algorithm is very simple: in each round t, it chooses agent
p
min arg max πi (t)/νi (t) + 8 log(T )/νi (t) .
i
L EMMA 7.5. In the stochastic MAB mechanism design problem, let A be a MAB allocation rule induced by a well-formed MAB algorithm. Then A is stochastically monotone.
P ROOF. We will use an alternative way to define a realization of random click rewards: a stack-realization is a n × T table in which the (i, t) entry is the click bit that
agent i receives the t-th time she is played. Clearly a stack-realization and a bid vector
uniquely determine the behavior of A. We will show that:
A is monotone for each stack-realization.
(13)
Then A is monotone in expectation over any distribution over stack-realizations, and
in particular it is monotone in expectation over the random clicks in the stochastic
MAB setting, so the Lemma follows.
Let us prove Claim (13). Throughout the proof, fix stack-realization σ, agent i, and
bid vector b−i . Consider two bids bi < b+
i . The claim asserts that agent i receives at
least as many clicks with bid b+
than
with
bid bi .
i
Let us introduce some notation (letting bi be the bid of agent i). Let A(bi , t) be the
agent selected by the allocation rule in round t. For each agent j, let νj (bi , t) and πj (bi , t)
be, respectively, the total number of impressions and the total click reward of agent j in
the first t rounds. Let π̂j (bi , t) = (bj /bmax ) πj (bi , t) be the corresponding total modified
click reward. Let ν(bi , t) (resp., π(bi , t) and π̂(bi , t)) be the n-dimensional vector whose
j-th component is νj (bi , t) (resp., πj (bi , t) and π̂j (bi , t)) for each agent j.
Note that (π̂(bi , t), ν(bi , t)) is the round-t statistics for the MAB algorithm that A is
induced by. For each agent j, νj (bi , t) uniquely determines πj (bi , t):
Pνj
σ(j, s) where νj = νj (bi , t).
(14)
πj (bi , t) = s=1
Let us overview the forthcoming technical argument. We will show by induction on
t that νi (bi , t) ≤ νi (b+
i , t) for all t. For the induction step we only need to worry about
the case when the claim holds for a given t with equality. In this case we show that
ν−i (bi , t) = ν−i (b+
i , t). This is trivial for n = 2 agents; the general case requires a rather
delicate argument that uses the χ-IIA property in Definition 7.3.12
Now let us carry out the proofs in detail. First, denote ν∗ (bi , t) , t − νi (bi , t), and let
us show that for any two rounds t, s it holds that
+
ν∗ (bi , t) = ν∗ (b+
i , s) ⇒ ν−i (bi , t) = ν−i (bi , s).
(15)
11 To ensure the χ-IIA property, we use a slightly modified version of UCB1: log T is used instead of log t, and
min is used to break ties (instead of an arbitrary rule). This change does not affect regret guarantees. We
will denote this version as UCB1 without further notice.
12 Also, we will use the fact that the probabilities χ (π̂, ν) in Definition 7.3 do not depend on the round (given
j
j and (π̂, ν)). This is the only place in any of the proofs where we invoke this fact.
0:24
M. Babaioff et al.
Let us use induction on ν∗ (bi , t). For ν∗ (bi , t) = 0 the statement is trivial. For the induction step, suppose Equation (15) holds whenever ν∗ (bi , t) = ν∗ , and let us sup′
′
pose ν∗ (bi , t) = ν∗ (b+
i , s) = ν∗ + 1. Let t and s be the latest rounds such that
+ ′
′
′
ν∗ (bi , t ) = ν∗ (bi , s ) = ν∗ . By the induction hypothesis, ν−i (bi , t′ ) = ν−i (b+
i , s ). It re+ ′
′
mains to prove that A(bi , t + 1) = A(bi , s + 1), i.e. that the allocation rule’s selections
in round t′ + 1 given bids (b−i , bi ), and in round s′ + 1 given bids (b−i , b+
i ), are the
same.13 By Definition 7.3 these selections are uniquely determined (given the stackrealization) by the bids and the impression counts ν. By the choice of t′ and s′ , neither
of the two selections is i, so by the χ-IIA condition in Definition 7.3 the selections
are uniquely determined by b−i and ν−i , and hence are the same. This proves Equation (15).
Now, to prove Claim (13) it suffices to show that for all t
νi (bi , t) ≤ νi (b+
i , t).
(16)
Let us use induction on t. The claim is trivial for t = 1, since the impression of agent
i in round 1 does not depend on (b; σ). For the induction step, assume that the assertion Equation (16) holds for some t, and let us prove it for t + 1. Note that (using the
notation from Definition 7.3)
νi (bi , t + 1) = νi (bi , t) + χi (π̂(bi , t); ν(bi , t)).
Now, νi (bi , t) ≤ νi (b+
i , t) by induction hypothesis. If the inequality is strict then Equation (16) trivially holds for t+1. Now suppose νi (bi , t) = νi (b+
i , t). Then by Equation (15)
we have ν(bi , t) = ν(b+
,
t).
Moreover,
by
Equation
(14)
we
have π(bi , t) = π(b+
i
i , t) and
+
+
therefore π̂−i (bi , t) = π̂−i (bi , t) and π̂i (bi , t) < π̂i (bi , t). Thus, by the χ-monotonicity
property in Definition 7.3 we have
+
χi (π̂(bi , t); ν(bi , t)) ≤ χi (π̂(b+
i , t); ν(bi , t)).
This concludes the proof of Equation (16), and that Claim (13).
7.3. Truthfulness and regret
In this subsection we focus on the stochastic MAB setting, and consider the trade-off
between regret and various notions of truthfulness. Ideally, one would like an MAB
mechanism to be truthful in the strongest possible sense (universally ex-post), and
have the same regret bounds as optimal MAB algorithms.
Let us start with some background. In Babaioff, Sharma and Slivkins [Babaioff et al.
2014] it was proved that any deterministic mechanism that is ex-post truthful and
ex-post normalized (under very mild restrictions), and any distribution over such
deterministic mechanisms, incurs much higher regret than an optimal MAB algorithm such as UCB1. Namely, the lower bound in [Babaioff
√ et al. 2014] states that
R(T ) = Ω(n1/3 T 2/3 ), whereas UCB1 has regret R(T ) = O( nT log T ). 14 For δ-gap instances the difference is even more pronounced: the analysis in [Babaioff et al. 2014]
provides a polynomial lower bound of Rδ (T ) = Ω(δ T λ ) for some λ > 0, whereas UCB1
achieves logarithmic regret Rδ (T ) = O( nδ log T ).
Our first result is that we can use the machinery from Section 7.2 to match the regret
of UCB1 for truthful mechanisms. We apply Theorem 7.1 (with µ = T1 ) and Lemma 7.5
to UCB1 to obtain the following corollary:
13 Then ν (b , t) = ν (b+ , s) because in all rounds from t′ + 2 to t (resp., from s′ + 2 to s) agent i is played.
−i i
−i i
14 Following the literature on regret minimization, we are mainly interested in the asymptotic behavior of
R(T ) as a function of T when n is fixed.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:25
C OROLLARY 7.6. In the stochastic MAB mechanism design problem, there exists a
mechanism M such that
(a) M is stochastically truthful, ex-post no-positive-transfers, universally ex-post individually rational.
√
(b) M has regret R(T ) = O( nT log T ) and δ-gap regret Rδ (T ) = O( nδ log T ).
Remark 7.7. The
√ regret and δ-gap regret in the above theorem are within small
factors (resp., O( log T ) and O(1)) of the best possible for any MAB allocation rule.
Remark 7.8. [Babaioff et al. 2014] provides a weaker result which transforms any
monotone MAB algorithm such as UCB1 into a truthful and normalized MAB mechanism with matching regret bounds. The guarantees in [Babaioff et al. 2014] are weaker
for the following reasons. First, it only applies to 0-1 click rewards, whereas our setting
allows for arbitrary click rewards in [0, 1]. Second, the individual rationality guarantee in [Babaioff et al. 2014] is much weaker: an agent may be charged more than her
bid (which never happens in our mechanism), and the charge may be huge, as high
as bi × (4n)T ; thus, a risk-averse agent may be reluctant to participate. Third, the nopositive-transfers guarantee is weaker: for some realizations of the click rewards the
expected payment may be negative. Finally, the payment rule in [Babaioff et al. 2014]
requires (as stated) a prohibitively expensive computation.
The truthfulness in Corollary 7.6 is only in expectation over the random click rewards. Thus, after seeing a specific realization of the rewards an agent might regret
having been truthful. Accordingly, we would like a stronger property: ex-post truthfulness, i.e. truthfulness for every given realization of the rewards.
The main result of this section is an ex-post truthful MAB mechanism with optimal
regret bounds. Unlike Corollary 7.6, this result requires designing a new MAB allocation rule.15 This allocation rule and its analysis are the main technical contributions.
T HEOREM 7.9. In the stochastic MAB mechanism design problem, there is a mechanism M such that
(a) M is ex-post truthful, ex-post no-positive-transfers, and universally ex-post individually rational.
√
(b) M has regret R(T ) = O( nT log T ) and δ-gap regret Rδ (T ) = O( nδ log T ).
The theorem follows from Theorem 7.1 (with µ = T1 ) if there exists an MAB allocation
rule that is ex-post monotone and has the claimed regret bounds. Below we provide
such allocation rule, called NewCB.
L EMMA 7.10. NewCB is ex-post monotone and satisfies the regret bounds in Theorem 7.9(b).
Remark 7.11. NewCB is deterministic. While not essential for Theorem 7.9, this fact
confirms the intuition from [Babaioff et al. 2014] that the main obstacle for deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanisms is insufficient observable information to compute
payments rather than ex-post monotonicity of an allocation rule.
NewCB maintains a set of active agents; initially all agents are active. For each round
t, there is a designated agent i = 1 + (t mod n). If this agent is active, then it is allo15 In
particular, the allocation rule induced by UCB1 is not ex-post monotone and thus cannot be used to
achieve ex-post truthfulness using the results of Section 7.2. To see that, consider a simple setting with two
agents and two rounds, and a click realization in which both agents are not clicked at the first round, but
are clicked at the second. With this click realization, an agent might be better off decreasing his bid in order
to lose (i.e., not be selected in) the first round, and then win (i.e., be selected in) the second round.
0:26
M. Babaioff et al.
cated. Else, an active agent is chosen (according to some fixed ordering on the agents)
and allocated. For each agent i, lower and upper confidence bounds (Li , Ui ) on the product bi µi are maintained (recall that µi is the CTR of agent i). After each round, each
agent is de-activated if its upper confidence bound is smaller than someone else’s lower
confidence bound. The pseudocode is in Algorithm 5.
Algorithm 5: NewCB: ex-post monotone MAB allocation rule.
1: Given: n = #agents, T = #rounds, upper bound bmax .
2: Solicit a bid vector b from the agents; b ← b/bmax .
3: Initialize: set of active agents Sact = {all agents}.
4: for all agent i do
5:
ci ← 0; ni ← 0 {total click reward and #impressions}
6:
{the totals are only over “designated” rounds}
7:
Ui ← bi ; Li ← 0 {Upper and Lower Confidence Bounds}
8: {Main Loop}
9: for rounds t = 1, 2, . . . , T do
10:
i ← 1 + (t mod n). {The “designated” agent}
11:
if i ∈ Sact then
12:
Allocate agent i.
13:
ni ← ni + 1; ci ← ci + reward. {Update statistics.}
14:
{Update confidence bounds.}
15:
if Li < Ui then
p
16:
(L′i , Ui′ ) ← bi (ci /ni ∓ 8 log(T )/ni )).
17:
if max(Li , L′i ) < min(Ui , Ui′ ) then
18:
(Li , Ui ) ← (max(Li , L′i ), min(Ui , Ui′ )).
19:
else
i
i
20:
(Li , Ui ) ← ( Li +U
, Li +U
).
2
2
21:
else
22:
Allocate agent i = min Sact .
23:
for all agent i ∈ Sact do
24:
if Ui < maxj∈Sact Lj then
25:
Remove i from Sact .
Fix realization ρ and bid vector b. Let Sact (t, b) be the set of active agents in the
beginning of round t. For each agent i, let Li (t, b) and Ui (t, b) be the values of Li and Ui
in the end of round t.
The goal of the specific update rules for the confidence bounds (lines 15-20) and the
statistics (lines 13) is to guarantee the following two properties:
— the statistics are kept only for rounds when a designated agent is played. Moreover,
for each agent i and round t, and any two bid vectors b and b′ we have
Li (t, b)/bi = Li (t, b′ )/b′i
′
if i ∈ Sact (t, b) ∩ Sact (t, b ) then
.
(17)
Ui (t, b)/bi = Ui (t, b′ )/b′i
— for any fixed realization ρ and bid vector b, and each agent i: Li ≤ Ui , and from
round to round Li is non-decreasing and Ui is non-increasing. In other words, for
each round t it holds that
Li (t − 1, b) ≤ Li (t, b) ≤ Ui (t, b) ≤ Ui (t − 1, b).
(18)
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:27
The ex-post monotonicity follows from these two properties and the de-activation rule
(lines 24-25).
Ex-post monotonicity. Let L∗ (t, b) , maxi∈Sact (t,b) Li (t, b). Fix agent i and b+
i > bi ,
+
and let b+ = (b−i , b+
)
be
the
“alternative”
bid
vector.
Let
λ
=
b
/b
.
i
i
i
C LAIM 7.12. We establish the following sequence of claims:
(C1) L∗ (t, b) is non-decreasing in t, for any fixed b.
(C2) For each round t, L∗ (t, b) ≤ λ L∗ (t, b+ ).
(C3) For each round t, Sact (t, b+ ) \ {i} ⊂ Sact (t, b) \ {i}.
(C4) In each round t: if i ∈ Sact (t, b) then i ∈ Sact (t, b+ ).
P ROOF. Let us prove the parts (C1-C4) one by one.
(C1). We use property (18) and the de-activation rule. Throughout the proof, we omit
the bid vector b from the notation. Fix round t ≥ 2. Let i ∈ Sact (t − 1) be an agent such
that L∗ (t − 1) = Li (t − 1). If i ∈ Sact (t) then
L∗ (t − 1) = Li (t − 1) ≤ Li (t) ≤ L∗ (t)
Else i is de-activated in round t, so
L∗ (t − 1) = Li (t − 1) ≤ Li (t) ≤ Ui (t) < L∗ (t).
(C2). Suppose, for the sake of contradiction, that L∗ (t, b) > λ L∗ (t, b+ ). Let j ∈ Sact (t, b)
be an agent such that Lj (t, b) = L∗ (t, b). If j ∈ Sact (t, b+ ) then by property (17) we have
L∗ (t, b) = Lj (t, b) = λ Lj (t, b∗ ) ≤ λ L∗ (t, b+ ),
contradiction. We conclude that j 6∈ Sact (t, b+ ). Thus with bid vector b+ agent j gets
disqualified during some round s < t. Thus,
Uj (s, b+ ) < L∗ (s, b+ ) ≤ L∗ (t, b+ ),
(19)
where the second inequality is by Part (C1). Now using property (18) and property (17)
(for the right-most inequality), we get that
L∗ (t, b) = Lj (t, b) ≤ Uj (t, b) ≤ Uj (s, b) = λ Uj (s, b+ ).
Thus, L∗ (t, b) ≤ λ L∗ (t, b+ ) by Equation (19), the desired contradiction.
(C3). Use induction on t. The claim trivially holds for t = 1. Assuming the claim holds
for some t we prove it holds for t + 1. Fix agent j ∈ Sact (t + 1, b+ ) \ {i}. We need to prove
that j ∈ Sact (t + 1, b).
Note that j ∈ Sact (t, b+ ), and so j ∈ Sact (t, b) by the induction hypothesis. Therefore
L∗ (t, b) ≤ λ L∗ (t, b+ )
≤ λ Uj (t, b+ )
= Uj (t, b)
(by Part (C2))
(by the de-activation rule)
(by property (17))
So agent j is not deactivated in round t under bid vector b, i.e. j ∈ Sact (t + 1, b), completing the proof.
(C4). Use induction on t. The base case t = 0 holds because initially all agents are
active. For the induction step, assume that the statement holds for some round t ≥ 0.
Suppose i ∈ Sact (t + 1, b). We need to prove that i ∈ Sact (t + 1, b+ ).
Note that i ∈ Sact (t, b), and so i ∈ Sact (t, b+ ) by the induction hypothesis. Therefore
L∗ (t, b) ≤ Ui (t, b)
(by the de-activation rule)
+
= λ Ui (t, b )
(by property (17)).
0:28
M. Babaioff et al.
If L∗ (t, b) = λ L∗ (t, b+ ), then L∗ (t, b+ ) = L∗ (t, b)/λ ≤ Ui (t, b+ ), and we are done.
From here on, assume L∗ (t, b) 6= λ L∗ (t, b+ ). Then L∗ (t, b) < λ L∗ (t, b+ ) by Part (C2).
Pick agent j which maximizes Lj (t, b+ ). If j 6= i then j ∈ Sact (t, b) by Part (C3), so
L∗ (t, b) ≥ Lj (t, b)
= λ Lj (t, b+ )
∗
+
= λ L (t, b )
by property (17))
(by the choice of j),
contradicting our assumption. Then j = i, and so L∗ (t, b+ ) = Li (t, b+ ) ≤ Ui (t, b+ ).
Ex-post monotonicity follows easily from (C3-C4).
C LAIM 7.13. Consider a fixed round t. Suppose agent i is allocated with bid vector
b. Then it is also allocated with bid vector b+ .
P ROOF. Since i ∈ Sact (t, b), by (C4) we have i ∈ Sact (t, b+ ).
If agent i is the designated agent in round t, then as such it is allocated under both
bid vectors. If agent i is not the designated agent in round t, then i = min Sact (t, b). By
(C3) it holds that Sact (t, b+ ) ⊂ Sact (t, b), which implies that i = min Sact (t, b+ ). So i is
allocated under bid vector b+ , too.
Regret analysis. The regret analysis is relatively standard, following the ideas
in [Auer et al. 2002a]. For simplicity assume that bmax = 1. Fix a bid vector b.
For each agent i, let ci (t) and ni (t) be, respectively, the number of clicks and impressions
p in all rounds s ≤ t when it is allocated as the designated agent. Let
ri (t) = 8 log(T )/ni (t). Then the event
|µi − ci (t)/ni (t)| ≤ ri (t)
for all rounds t
(20)
holds with probability at least 1 − T −2. 16 In what follows, let us assume that this event
holds for all agents i. (The regret accumulated if this event fails is negligible.)
Then it easily follows from the specs of NewCB that for each agent i,
Li (t, b) ≤ bi µi ≤ Ui (t, b)
Ui (t, b) − Li (t, b) ≤ 2 ri (t)
Let i∗ ∈ argmaxi bi µi be a best agent. Note that Ui∗ (t, b) ≥ bi∗ µi∗ ≥ bi µi ≥ Li (b, t) for
all agents i and rounds t. It follows that i∗ is never de-activated by the algorithm.
Consider some agent i with ∆i , bi∗ µi∗ − bi µi > 0. Then ri (t) < ∆i after O(∆−2
i log T )
rounds in which this agent is allocated as the designated agent. After such round t,
Ui (b, t) ≤ bi µi + ri (t) < bi µi + ∆i = bi∗ µi∗ ≤ Li∗ (b, t),
and therefore agent i is deactivated. It follows that agent i is allocated as the designated agent at most O(∆−2
i log T ) times. Therefore it is de-activated after at most
O(k ∆−2
log
T
)
rounds.
This,
in turn, implies the claimed regret bound.
i
16 This
follows from Azuma-Hoeffding inequality via a standard argument, one version of which we provide
below. Fix agent i. For each s ∈ N , let Xs be the click bit for the s-th time this agent is allocated as the
designated agent, if s ≤ ni (T ), and otherwise define Xs to be an independent 0-1 random variable with
expectation µi . Then the random variables Ys = Xs − µs , s ∈ N form a martingale. Applying
p AzumaP
8N log(T )
Hoeffding inequality to Y1 , . . . , YN , for any given N , we obtain that the event | N
s=1 Ys | ≤
holds with probability at least 1 − T −3 . Taking the Union Bounds over all N ≤ T , and noting that ci (t) =
Pni (t)
−2 .
s=1 Xs , it follows that the event (20) holds with probability at least 1 − T
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:29
7.4. The power of randomization
A by-product of Theorem 7.9 is a separation between the power of deterministic and
randomized mechanisms, in terms of regret for MAB mechanisms that are ex-post
truthful and ex-post normalized. The lower bound for deterministic mechanisms is
from [Babaioff et al. 2014].
One challenge here is to ensure that the upper and lower bounds talk about exactly the same problem; as stated, Theorem 7.9 and the main lower bound result
from [Babaioff et al. 2014] do not. To bypass this problem, we focus on the case of
two agents, and use a more general version of the lower bound: Theorem C.1 in the full
version of [Babaioff et al. 2014]. Further, to match [Babaioff et al. 2014] we extend the
mechanism from Theorem 7.9 to a setting in which bmax is not known a priori.
We formulate the separation theorem as follows. Denote R(T, bmax ) , max R(T ; b; µ),
where the maximum is taken over all CTR vectors µ and all bid vectors b such that
bi ≤ bmax for all i.
T HEOREM 7.14. Consider the stochastic MAB mechanism design problem with
two agents. Assume bmax is not known a priori to the mechanism. Suppose M is an
MAB mechanism that is (i) ex-post truthful and ex-post normalized, and (ii) has regret
R(T, bmax ) = Õ(bmax T γ ) for some γ and any bmax . Then:
(a) [Babaioff et al. 2014] If M is deterministic then γ ≥ 23 .
(b) There exists such randomized M with γ = 12 .
P ROOF OF PART ( B ). Let A′ be the ex-post monotone MAB allocation rule in Theorem 7.9, for bmax = 1. Define an MAB allocation rule A as a rule that inputs the bid
vector b and passes the modified bid vector b′ = b/(maxi bi ) to A′ . We claim that A is expost monotone, too. Indeed, w.l.o.g. assume b1 > b2 . If b2 increases (to a value ≤ b1 ), then
b′2 increases while b′1 stays the same. Thus, the total click reward of agent 2 increases.
If b1 increases then b′2 decreases while b′1 stays the same, so the total click reward of
agent 2 does not increase, which implies that the total click reward of agent 1 does not
decrease. Claim proved. Now part (b) follows from Theorem 7.1 (with µ = T1 ).
8. EXTENSION TO MULTI-PARAMETER DOMAINS
Our general transformation from Section 4 can be extended to multi-parameter mechanisms.It is known that a multi-parameter allocation rule is truthfully implementable
if and only if it satisfies a property called “cycle-monotonicity”. Similar to the singleparameter case, we present a general procedure to take any cycle-monotone allocation
rule A and transform it into a randomized mechanism that is truthful-in-expectation,
implements the same outcome as A with probability arbitrarily close to 1, and requires
evaluating that allocation rule only once. The technical contribution here is that we
find a reduction from the multi-parameter setting to the single-parameter case.
This section is self-contained. For more background on multi-parameter mechanisms for a CS-oriented audience, please refer to [Archer and Kleinberg 2008a,b]. An
Economics-oriented background for this area can be found in [Ashlagi et al. 2010].
8.1. Preliminaries: multi-parameter domains
Generalized types. In the full generality, multi-parameter mechanisms are defined
as follows. There are n agents and a set O of outcomes. Each agent i is characterized
by his type xi : O → R, where xi (o) is interpreted as the agent’s valuation for the
outcome o ∈ O. For each agent i there is a set of feasible types, denoted Ti . Denote
0:30
M. Babaioff et al.
T = T1 × . . . × Tn and call it the type space; call Ti the type space of agent i. The
mechanism knows (n, O, T ), but not the actual types xi ; each type xi is known only to
the corresponding agent i. Formally, a problem instance, also called a multi-parameter
domain, is a tuple (n, O, T ).
Using this general notion of types, we define truthful mechanisms in essentially
the same way as in Section 3, with minimal syntactic changes. A (direct revelation)
mechanism M consists of the pair (A, P), where A : T → O is the allocation rule and
P : T → Rn is the payment rule. Both A and P can be randomized. Each agent i reports
a type bi ∈ Ti to the mechanism, which is called the bid of this agent. We denote the
vector of bids by b = (b1 , . . . , bn ) ∈ T . The mechanism receives the bid vector b ∈ T ,
selects an outcome A(b), and charges each agent i a payment of Pi (b). The utilities are
quasi-linear and agents are risk-neutral: if agent i has type xi ∈ Ti and the bid vector
is b ∈ T , then this agent’s utility is
ui (xi ; b) = E [xi (A(b)) − Pi (b)] .
M
(21)
For each type xi ∈ Ti of agent i we use a standard notation (b−i , xi ) to denote the bid
vector b̂ such that b̂i = xi and b̂j = bj for every agent j 6= i.
Special case: dot-product valuations. For intuition, consider dot-product valuations, an important special case where the type x ∈ Ti of each agent i can be decomposed as a dot product x(o) = βx · ai (o), for each outcome o ∈ O, where βx , ai (o) ∈ Rd
are some finite-dimensional vectors. Here the term ai (o) is the same for all types x ∈ Ti
(and known to the mechanism), whereas βx is the same for all outcomes o ∈ O and is
known only to agent i. The term ai (o) is usually called an “allocation” of agent i for
outcome o, and βx is called the “private value”. The single-parameter domains defined
in Section 3 correspond to the case d = 1.
Note that the type x of each agent i is determined by the corresponding private value
βx , and his type space Ti is determined by Di = {βx : x ∈ Ti } ⊂ Rd . Because of this,
in the literature on dot-product valuations the term “type” often refers to βx . To avoid
ambiguity, in this section we will refer to βx as “private value” rather than “type”, and
call D1 × . . . × Dn the private value space.
Game-theoretic properties. Truthfulness and individual rationality are defined exactly as in Section 3 if expressed in terms of the agents’ utility:
— A mechanism is truthful if for every agent i truthful bidding is a dominant strategy:
ui (xi ; (b−i , xi )) ≥ ui (xi ; b) ∀xi ∈ Ti , b ∈ T .
(22)
An allocation rule is called truthfully implementable if it is the allocation rule in
some truthful mechanism.
— A mechanism is individually rational (IR) if each agent i never receives negative
utility by participating in the mechanism and bidding truthfully:
ui (xi ; (b−i , xi )) ≥ 0 ∀xi ∈ Ti , b−i ∈ T−i .
(23)
The right-hand side in (23) represents the maximal guaranteed utility of an “outside
option” (i.e., from not participating in the mechanism). For example, our definition of
IR is meaningful whenever this utility is 0, which is a typical assumption for most
multi-parameter domains studied in the literature.
Our assumptions. We make two assumptions on the type space T :
— non-negative types: xi (o) ≥ 0 for each agent i, each type xi ∈ Ti , and each outcome
o ∈ O.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:31
— rescalable types: λxi ∈ Ti for each agent i, each type xi ∈ Ti , and any parameter
λ ∈ [0, 1].
For dot-product valuations, types are rescalable if and only if it holds that βx ∈ Di ⇒
λβx ∈ Di for each λ ∈ [0, 1]. Thus, assuming rescalable types is equivalent to assuming
that the set Di is star-convex at 0. To ensure non-negative types, it suffices to assume
that Di ⊂ Rd+ for each agent i, and all allocations are non-negative: ai (o) ∈ Rd+ for all
o ∈ O.
In particular, for each agent i there exists a zero type: a type xi ∈ Ti such that
xi (·) ≡ 0. Let us say that a mechanism is normalized if for each agent i, the expected
payment of this agent is 0 whenever she submits the zero type.
Truthfulness characterization. We will use the following characterization of truthful mechanisms. A (randomized) allocation rule A is cycle-monotone if the following
property holds: for each bid vector b ∈ T , each agent i, each k ≥ 2, and each k-tuple
xi,0 , xi,1 , . . . , xi,k ∈ Ti of this agent’s types, we have
k
X
xi,j (oi,j ) − xi, (j−1) mod k (oi,j ) ≥ 0, where oi,j = A (b−i , xi,j ) ∈ O.
E
(24)
A
j=0
T HEOREM 8.1 (R OCHET [1987]). Consider an arbitrary multi-parameter domain
(n, O, T ). A (randomized) allocation rule A is truthfully implementable if and only if it
is cycle-monotone. Assuming rescalable types, for any cycle-monotone allocation rule A,
a mechanism (A, P) is truthful and normalized if and only if
Z 1
E [Pi (b)] = E bi (A(b)) −
bi (A(b−i , t bi )) dt .
(25)
A
A
t=0
Note that this theorem generalizes Theorem 3.2 for single-parameter mechanisms,
as applied to single-parameter domains with private value space [0, 1]n . In particular, Equation (25) generalizes the Myerson payment rule for single-parameter mechanisms.
8.2. The multi-parameter transformation
Consider allocation rule A, bid vector b ∈ T , and the rescaling vector λ ∈ [0, 1]n . Denote
λ ⊗ b = (λ1 b1 , . . . , λn bn ) ∈ T .
In other words, λ ⊗ b is the “rescaled” bid vector where the bid of each agent i is λi bi ;
this bid vector is well-defined because we assumed the rescalable types property. Note
that for each b the subset
Tb = {λ ⊗ b : λ ∈ [0, 1]n } ⊂ T
forms a single-parameter type space where each agent i has private value λi ∈ [0, 1]
and allocation bi (o) for every outcome o. By abuse of notation, let us treat the allocation
/ payment rules for Tb as functions from the private value space [0, 1]n rather than the
type space Tb .
Consider an allocation rule Ab (λ) = A(λ ⊗ b) for the single-parameter type space
Tb . If the original allocation rule A is truthfully implementable for type space T using
payment rule P, then Ab is truthfully implementable for type space Tb using payment
rule Pb (λ) = P(λ ⊗ b), because restricting the allocation and payment rules to Tb only
limits the set of possible misreports of an agent. Essentially, the idea will be to apply
our single-parameter transformation to Ab .
0:32
M. Babaioff et al.
Let fµ = (f1 , . . . , fn ) be the n-tuple of canonical self-resampling procedures with
resampling probability µ, for some fixed µ ∈ (0, 1). (See Algorithm 1 on page 13.) For
each bid vector b ∈ T , let
eb ) = AllocToMech(Ab , µ, fµ )
(Aeb , P
(26)
be the single-parameter mechanism for type space Tb obtained by applying our singleparameter transformation from Section 4 to allocation Ab .17
The transformed multi-parameter mechanism is defined as
e
e
eb (~1 ) for every b ∈ T .
A(b),
P(b)
= Aeb (~1 ), P
(27)
This completes the description of our multi-parameter transformation. The useful
properties of this transformation are captured in the theorem below.
T HEOREM 8.2. Consider an arbitrary multi-parameter domain (n, O, T ) with
rescalable, non-negative types. Let A be a cycle-monotone allocation rule. Let Mµ =
e P)
e be the transformed mechanism defined by Equations(26-27), for some parameter
(A,
µ ∈ (0, 1). Then Mµ has the following properties:
(a) Mµ is truthful and normalized.
(b) Mµ is universally ex-post individually rational and ex-post no-positive-transfers.
Moreover, given a bid vector b, it never pays any agent i more than bi (o)( µ1 − 1),
where o = A(b) ∈ O.
e
(c) For any bid vector b ∈ T (and any fixed random seed of nature) allocations A(b)
and
A(b) are identical with probability at least 1 − nµ.
2
-approximate.
(d) If A is α-approximate (for social welfare) then Ae is α/ 1 − 1−µ
P ROOF. Parts (b) and (c) follow immediately from Theorem 4.5, and part (d) follows
immediately from Theorem 5.1. Thus, it remains to prove part (a).
Note that the single-parameter allocation rule Aeb has the following property: for
each agent i the single-parameter bid λi is rescaled by the (randomly chosen) factor
χi ∈ [0, 1] which does not depend on the bid, and then Ab is called. Therefore, letting
χ = (χ1 , . . . , χn ), it holds that
Aeb (λ) = A(χ ⊗ (λ ⊗ b))
for all b ∈ T and λ ∈ [0, 1]n .
(28)
We claim that Ae is cycle-monotone. Indeed, fix bid vector b ∈ T , agent i, some k ≥ 2,
and a k-tuple xi,0 , xi,1 , . . . , xi,k ∈ Ti of this agent’s types. Let us consider a fixed realization of the random vector χ ∈ [0, 1]n . For each type xi,j , note that (by Equations (28)
and (27)) we have
e i,j , b−i ) = Ae(x ,b ) ( ~1 ) = A (χ ⊗ (b−i , xi,j )) ∈ O.
A(x
i,j
−i
Denote this outcome by oi,j (χ). Apply the cycle-monotonicity of A for bid vector χ ⊗
(xi,j , b−i ):
k
X
xi,j (oi,j (χ)) − xi, (j−1) mod k (oi,j (χ)) ≥ 0.
E
(29)
A
j=0
17 Note that the transformed mechanism depends on µ. We do not make this dependence explicit, to simplify
the notation.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:33
e i,j , b−i ), we observe that for this fixed realization of
Recalling that oi,j (χ) = A(x
χ, Equation (29) is exactly the inequality in the definition of cycle-monotonicity for
e Therefore taking expectation over χ, we obtain the desired inequality (24) for A.
e
A.
Claim proved.18
e P),
e the payment rule satIt remains to prove that in the transformed mechanism (A,
isfies Equation (25). Fix bid vector b and consider the transformed single-parameter
eb ) for the single-parameter type space Tb . In the terminology of
mechanism (Aeb , P
single-parameter domains, each agent i receives an allocation Aeb, i (λ) = bi (Aeb (λ))
whenever the bid vector is λ ∈ [0, 1]n . Since this is a truthful and normalized singleparameter mechanism, it follows that
#
"
Z λi
h
i
e
e
e
E Pb (λ) = E λi Ab, i (λ) −
Ab, i (λ−i , u) du , ∀λ ∈ [0, 1]n .
0
Plugging in λ = ~1 and Equation (27), we obtain the desired Equation (25).
9. OPEN QUESTIONS
This paper gives rise to a number of open questions. As discussed in Section 2.1,
some of these questions have been partially addressed in the follow-up work. Here
we present the current status.
Variance vs. expectation tradeoff. Randomized mechanisms constructed via our
general transformation exhibit an explicit tradeoff between the variance in payments
and the loss in expected welfare compared to the optimal allocation rule. Since the
variance in payments can be very high, it is desirable to optimize this tradeoff (to
complement the expectation-only guarantees).
The worst-case optimality result in Wilkens and Sivan [2012], discussed in Section 2.1, does not resolve this question, since it does not rule out a reduction which
achieves a better tradeoff for some (but not all) monotone allocation rules. Further, the
optimal tradeoff for a given domain could be achieved by a mechanism that cannot be
presented as a reduction from some welfare-optimal allocation rule.
Our informal conjecture is that the tradeoff in this paper is optimal for any given
single-parameter domain with “informational obstacle”, i.e. whenever payment computation for welfare-optimal allocation rule is impossible due to the insufficient observable information.
A specific formal conjecture is that our tradeoff is optimal for MAB mechanisms.
To take an extreme version, what welfare loss can be achieved if no rebates (i.e., no
positive transfers) are allowed?
The power of randomization. We have a separation result for randomized vs. deterministic ex-post truthful MAB mechanisms. Can one obtain similar separation results for other single-parameter domains? The positive side for any such hypothetical
separation result is provided by our general reduction, so it remains to produce the
corresponding negative result for deterministic mechanisms. However, such negative
results are not likely to be easy, considering the difficulties faced by [Babaioff et al.
2014; Devanur and Kakade 2009] for MAB mechanisms. One specific target would be
the router scheduling problem proposed in [Shnayder et al. 2012].
18 Note that the proof of cycle-monotonicity of A
e did not use any other property of the canonical selfresampling procedures fµ other than Equation (28). The truthfulness properties of fµ are used in the forthcoming argument about payments.
0:34
M. Babaioff et al.
MAB allocation rules. This paper opens up the problem of designing monotone
MAB allocation rules, which is a new angle in the rich literature on MAB (also
see [Slivkins 2011b]). While we have focused on stochastic MAB, many other MAB
settings have been studied in the literature, making various assumptions on payoff
evolution over time (e.g., [Auer et al. 2002b; Slivkins and Upfal 2008; Hazan and Kale
2009]), dependencies between arms (e.g., [Flaxman et al. 2005; Pandey et al. 2007;
Kleinberg et al. 2008b; Srinivas et al. 2010]), and side information available to the algorithm (e.g., [Kleinberg et al. 2008b; Langford and Zhang 2007; Slivkins 2011a]). For
most such settings one could meaningfully define the corresponding mechanism design
problem; we have reduced this problem to that of designing monotone MAB allocation
rules. In particular, for any given MAB setting one could ask whether monotone MAB
allocation rules can achieve optimal regret.
One appealing target here is the adversarial MAB setting (with oblivious adversary). The ex-post truthful mechanism in [Babaioff et al. 2014] achieves regret
1/3 2/3
Õ(k
√ T ) for this setting, whereas the best known MAB algorithms achieve regret
O( kT ) [Auer et al. 2002b; Audibert and Bubeck 2010]; it is not clear what is the tight
regret bound.
More applications. In addition to the applications presented in this paper and
the follow-up work, what other domains can our general reduction (and the multiparameter extension thereof) be fruitfully applied to? In particular, one could consider
two generalizations of MAB mechanisms: to multiple ads per agent and to multiple ad
slots with slot-dependent values-per-click.
APPENDIX: O NE S HOT is equivalent to Algorithm 1 (proof of Proposition 4.8)
Let us compare the sampling procedures defined by Algorithm 1 and O NE S HOT . To
simplify the notation, we will omit the subscript i from the description of the procedures. That is, a self-resampling procedure inputs a scalar bid b and a random seed w,
and outputs two numbers (x, y). To prove that O NE S HOT is equivalent to Algorithm 1,
we analyze a family of sampling rules that uses bounded-depth recursion to “interpolate” between O NE S HOT and Algorithm 1. Specifically, define BDRk to be the following
family of sampling algorithms parameterized by k ∈ N∪{∞}, where k−1 is interpreted
as ∞ when k = ∞.
Algorithm 6: The sampling algorithm BDRk : Bounded Depth Recursion.
1: Input: bid b ∈ [0, ∞], parameter µ ∈ (0, 1).
2: Output: (x, y) such that 0 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ b.
3: with probability 1 − µ
4:
x ← b, y ← b.
5: else
6:
if k = 0
7:
Pick γ1 , γ2 ∈ [0, 1] indep., uniformly at random.
1/(1−µ)
1/(1−µ)
1/µ
8:
x ← b · γ1
, y ← b · max{γ1
, γ2 }.
9:
else
k>0
10:
Pick b′ ∈ [0, b] uniformly at random.
11:
(x′ , y ′ ) = BDRk−1 (b′ , µ).
12:
x ← x′ , y ← b′ .
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:35
The reader may easily verify that BDRk is equal to O NE S HOT when k = 0 and that
it is equal to Algorithm 1 when k = ∞. Furthermore, for any k < k ′ (where k ′ ≤ ∞)
there is an obvious coupling of BDRk with BDRk′ such that the two algorithms have
probability at most µk+1 of outputting different results: simply let the two executions
share the same randomness until the recursion depth equals k. Thus, as k → ∞, the
output distribution of BDRk converges, in total variation distance, to that of BDR∞ .
We will prove that for every finite k the algorithms BDRk and BDRk+1 have identical
output distributions, from which it follows that their output distribution is identical to
that of BDR0 and, therefore, that BDR∞ also has the same output distribution as BDR0 ,
confirming Proposition 4.8.
Couple BDRk and BDRk+1 so that they use shared randomness until the two algorithms reach differing points in their control flow. This occurs when the first algorithm
is executing a call to BDR0 and the second algorithm is executing a call to BDR1 on
the same input (β, µ). (We are denoting the input in this step of the recursive algorithms by (β, µ) rather than (b, µ), to distinguish β from the value of b on which the
two algorithms BDRk , BDRk+1 were originally called.) At this point, with probability
1 − µ both algorithms output (x, y) = (β, β). Conditional on this event not taking place,
1/q
1/p
1/p
BDR0 outputs (x, y) = (γ1 β, max{γ1 , γ2 }β) where p = 1 − µ, q = µ. Instead BDR 1
′
computes β = γ3 β where γ3 ∈ [0, 1] is uniformly random, and it outputs (x, y) = (β ′ , β ′ )
1/p
with probability p and otherwise (x, y) = (γ1 β ′ , β ′ ). Lemma A.1 tells us that these
two output distributions are the same.
L EMMA A.1. Let γ1 , γ2 , γ3 be mutually independent random variables, each uniformly distributed in [0, 1]. Let p, q > 0 be numbers such that p + q = 1. Define random
variables x, y, z by:
1/p
x = γ1
1/p
1/q
y = max{γ1 , γ2 }
(
γ3
if γ2 < p
z=
1/p
γ1 γ3 if γ2 ≥ p
Then the pairs (x, y) and (z, γ3 ) are identically distributed.
P ROOF. We will show, equivalently, that the pairs (y, x/y) and (γ3 , z/γ3 ) are identically distributed. The distribution of (γ3 , z/γ3) is completely characterized by the following facts which are immediate from the definition of z.
(1) γ3 and z/γ3 are independent;
(2) γ3 is uniformly distributed in [0, 1];
(3) z/γ3 is equal to 1 with probability p, and conditional on z/γ3 6= 1, the distribution
of (z/γ3 )p is uniform on [0, 1).
To finish the proof of the lemma, we shall prove the corresponding facts about y and
x/y. Let I1 , I2 ⊆ [0, 1] be any pair of intervals (open, closed, or half-open). Let a, b be the
endpoints of I1 and c, d the endpoints of I2 . To compute Pr(y ∈ I1 , x/y ∈ I2 ) it suffices
0:36
M. Babaioff et al.
to make the following two observations:
1/p
1/q
1/p
Pr(y ∈ I1 , x/y = 1) = Pr a ≤ γ1 ≤ b, 0 ≤ γ2 ≤ γ1
q/p
= Pr ap ≤ γ1 ≤ bp , 0 ≤ γ2 ≤ γ1
Z bp
Z bp
=
tq/p dt =
t1/p−1 dt = p(b − a)
ap
ap
1/q
Pr(y ∈ I1 , x/y ∈ I2 \ {1}) = Pr(a ≤ γ2
1/q
≤ b, cγ2
1/p
≤ γ1
1/q
< dγ2 )
p/q
p/q
= Pr(aq ≤ γ2 ≤ bq , cp γ2 ≤ γ1 ≤ dp γ2 )
Z bq
Z bq
p
p p/q
p
p
=
(d − c )t dt = (d − c )
t1/q−1 dt = q(dp − cp )(b − a).
aq
aq
Therefore,
Pr(y ∈ I1 , x/y ∈ I2 ) = (b − a) ·
q(dp − cp )
if 1 6∈ I2
.
p
p
p + q(d − c ) if 1 ∈ I2
From this formula it follows that y and x/y are independent, y is uniformly distributed,
Pr(x/y = 1) = p, and the distribution of (x/y)p conditional on x/y 6= 1 is uniform on
[0, 1).
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Tim Roughgarden for suggesting that for positive types, an improved bound on the social welfare is possible (see Section 5). We would like to acknowledge that the preliminary form of a generalization of our “generic transformation” to
negative bids, and (the preliminary form of) the applications to offline mechanism design, have been derived jointly with Jason Hartline.
REFERENCES
Aaron Archer and Robert Kleinberg. 2008a. Characterizing truthful mechanisms with
convex type spaces. SIGecom Exchanges 7, 3 (2008).
Aaron Archer and Robert Kleinberg. 2008b. Truthful germs are contagious: a local to
global characterization of truthfulness. In 9th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce
(EC). 21–30.
Aaron Archer, Christos Papadimitriou, Kunal Talwar, and Éva Tardos. 2004. An approximate truthful mechanism for combinatorial auctions with single parameter
agents. Internet Mathematics 1 (2004), 129–150. Extended abstract in SODA 2003.
Aaron Archer and Éva Tardos. 2001. Truthful Mechanisms for One-Parameter Agents.
In IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 482–491.
Itai Ashlagi, Mark Braverman, Avinatan Hassidim, and Dov Monderer. 2010. Monotonicity and Implementability. Econometrica 78, 5 (2010), 1749–1772.
Susan Athey and Ilya Segal. 2013. An Efficient Dynamic Mechanism. Econometrica
81, 6 (Nov. 2013), 2463–2485. A preliminary version has been available as a working
paper since 2007.
J.Y. Audibert and S. Bubeck. 2010. Regret Bounds and Minimax Policies under Partial
Monitoring. J. of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 11 (2010), 2785–2836. A
preliminary version has been published in COLT 2009.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:37
Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, and Paul Fischer. 2002a. Finite-time Analysis of the
Multiarmed Bandit Problem. Machine Learning 47, 2-3 (2002), 235–256. Preliminary version in 15th ICML, 1998.
Peter Auer, Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi, Yoav Freund, and Robert E. Schapire. 2002b. The
Nonstochastic Multiarmed Bandit Problem. SIAM J. Comput. 32, 1 (2002), 48–77.
Preliminary version in 36th IEEE FOCS, 1995.
Moshe Babaioff, Liad Blumrosen, and Michael Schapira. 2013. The communication
burden of payment determination. Games and Economic Behavior 77, 1 (2013), 153
– 167. Preliminary version in ACM EC 2008.
Moshe Babaioff, Robert Kleinberg, and Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2010. Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation. In 11th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (EC). 43–52.
Moshe Babaioff, Robert Kleinberg, and Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2013. Multi-parameter
mechanisms with implicit payment computation. In 13th ACM Conf. on Electronic
Commerce (EC). 35–52.
Moshe Babaioff, Yogeshwer Sharma, and Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2014. Characterizing
Truthful Multi-armed Bandit Mechanisms. SIAM J. on Computing (SICOMP) 43, 1
(2014), 194–230. Preliminary version in 10th ACM EC, 2009.
Xiaohui Bei and Zhiyi Huang. 2011. Bayesian Incentive Compatibility via Fractional
Assignments. In 22nd ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 720–733.
Dirk Bergemann and Maher Said. 2011. Dynamic Auctions: A Survey. In Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science, Vol. 2. Wiley: New York,
1511–1522.
Dirk Bergemann and Juuso Välimäki. 2010. The Dynamic Pivot Mechanism. Econometrica 78, 2 (2010), 771–789. Preliminary versions have been available since
2006, as Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers #1584 (2006), #1616 (2007) and
#1672(2008).
Patrick Briest, Shuchi Chawla, Robert Kleinberg, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2014.
Pricing Lotteries. Journal of Economic Theory (2014). In press, accepted manuscript.
Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2012. Optimal Multidimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization. In
53th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 130–139.
Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2013a. Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization: Approximation Algorithms and other Generalizations. In 24nd ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 578–595.
Yang Cai, Constantinos Daskalakis, and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2013b. Understanding
Incentives: Mechanism Design Becomes Algorithm Design. In 54th IEEE Symp. on
Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 618–627.
Shuchi Chawla, Nicole Immorlica, and Brendan Lucier. 2012. On the limits of blackbox reductions in mechanism design. In 44th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing
(STOC). 435–448.
Constantinos Daskalakis and S. Matthew Weinberg. 2014. Bayesian Truthful Mechanisms for Job Scheduling from Bi-criterion Approximation Algorithms. (2014).
arXiv:1405.5940.
Nikhil Devanur and Sham M. Kakade. 2009. The Price of Truthfulness for Pay-PerClick Auctions. In 10th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (EC). 99–106.
Shahar Dobzinski and Shaddin Dughmi. 2009. On the Power of Randomization in
Algorithmic Mechanism Design. In 50th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer
Science (FOCS).
Shahar Dobzinski, Hu Fu, and Robert D. Kleinberg. 2012. Optimal auctions with
correlated bidders are easy. Games and Economic Behavior (2012). Special issue
on selected algorithmic game theory papers from STOC, FOCS, and SODA 2011. In
0:38
M. Babaioff et al.
press.
Abraham Flaxman, Adam Kalai, and H. Brendan McMahan. 2005. Online Convex
Optimization in the Bandit Setting: Gradient Descent without a Gradient. In 16th
ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 385–394.
Nicola Gatti, Alessandro Lazaric, and Francesco Trovo. 2012. A Truthful Learning
Mechanism for Contextual Multi-Slot Sponsored Search Auctions with Externalities. In 13th ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (EC).
Jason D. Hartline. 2012. Approximation in Economic Design. Draft of a forthcoming
book, available at http://jasonhartline.com/MDnA/. (2012).
Jason D. Hartline, Robert Kleinberg, and Azarakhsh Malekian. 2011. Bayesian Incentive Compatibility via Matchings. In 22nd ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms
(SODA). 734–747.
Jason D. Hartline and Brendan Lucier. 2010. Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design.
In 42th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC). 301–310.
Elad Hazan and Satyen Kale. 2009. Better algorithms for benign bandits. In 20th
ACM-SIAM Symp. on Discrete Algorithms (SODA). 38–47.
Zhiyi Huang and Sampath Kannan. 2012. Exponential mechanism for social welfare:
private, truthful, and nearly optimal. Working paper. (2012).
Navendu Jain, Ishai Menache, Joseph Naor, and Jonathan Yaniv. 2011. A Truthful
Mechanism for Value-Based Scheduling in Cloud Computing. In 4th Symp. on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT).
Robert Kleinberg, Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil, and Yogeshwer Sharma. 2008a. Regret
bounds for sleeping experts and bandits. In 21st Conf. on Learning Theory (COLT).
425–436.
Robert Kleinberg, Aleksandrs Slivkins, and Eli Upfal. 2008b. Multi-Armed Bandits in
Metric Spaces. In 40th ACM Symp. on Theory of Computing (STOC). 681–690.
T.L. Lai and Herbert Robbins. 1985. Asymptotically efficient Adaptive Allocation
Rules. Advances in Applied Mathematics 6 (1985), 4–22.
John Langford and Tong Zhang. 2007. The Epoch-Greedy Algorithm for Contextual
Multi-armed Bandits. In 21st Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
(NIPS).
Alejandro M. Manelli and Daniel R. Vincent. 2006. Bundling as an optimal selling
mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist. Journal of Economic Theory 127, 1
(2006), 1 – 35.
Frank McSherry and Kunal Talwar. 2007. Mechanism Design via Differential Privacy.
In 48th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS). 94–103.
Roger B. Myerson. 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research
6 (1981), 58–73.
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. 2001. Algorithmic Mechanism Design. Games and Economic
Behavior 35, 1-2 (2001), 166–196.
Sandeep Pandey, Deepayan Chakrabarti, and Deepak Agarwal. 2007. Multi-armed
Bandit Problems with Dependent Arms. In 24th Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning
(ICML).
Jean-Charles Rochet. 1987. A necessary and sufficient condition for rationalizability
in a quasi-linear context. J. of Mathematical Economics 16, 2 (April 1987), 191–200.
Ilya Segal. 2010. Personal communication. (2010).
Victor Shnayder, Jeremy Hoon, David Parkes, and Vikas Kawadia. 2012. Truthful
Prioritization Schemes for Spectrum Sharing. In 7th Workshop on the Economics of
Networks, Systems and Computation (NetEcon).
Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2011a. Contextual Bandits with Similarity Information. In 24th
Conf. on Learning Theory (COLT). To appear in J. of Machine Learning Research
(JMLR), 2014.
Truthful Mechanisms with Implicit Payment Computation
0:39
Aleksandrs Slivkins. 2011b. Monotone multi-armed bandit allocations. Open Problem
Session at COLT 2011 (Conf. on Learning Theory). (2011).
Aleksandrs Slivkins and Eli Upfal. 2008. Adapting to a Changing Environment: the
Brownian Restless Bandits. In 21st Conf. on Learning Theory (COLT). 343–354.
Niranjan Srinivas, Andreas Krause, Sham Kakade, and Matthias Seeger. 2010. Gaussian Process Optimization in the Bandit Setting: No Regret and Experimental Design. In 27th Intl. Conf. on Machine Learning (ICML). 1015–1022.
John Thanassoulis. 2004. Haggling over substitutes. J. Economic Theory 117 (2004),
217–245.
Chris Wilkens and Balasubramanian Sivan. 2012. Single-Call Mechanisms. In 13th
ACM Conf. on Electronic Commerce (EC).
| 8cs.DS
|
arXiv:1710.05209v2 [cs.LG] 16 Feb 2018
Settling the Sample Complexity for Learning Mixtures
of Gaussians
Hassan Ashtiani
University of Waterloo
Shai Ben-David
University of Waterloo
Nick Harvey
University of British Columbia
Abbas Mehrabian
McGill University
Christopher Liaw
University of British Columbia
Yaniv Plan
University of British Columbia
Abstract
We prove that Θ̃(kd2 /ε2 ) samples are necessary and sufficient for learning a
mixture of k Gaussians in Rd , up to error ε in total variation distance. This improves
both the known upper bound and lower bound for this problem. For mixtures of
axis-aligned Gaussians, we show that Õ(kd/ε2 ) samples suffice, matching a known
lower bound. Moreover, these results hold in an agnostic learning setting as well.
The upper bound is based on a novel technique for distribution learning based on
a notion of sample compression. Any class of distributions that allows such a sample
compression scheme can also be learned with few samples. Moreover, if a class of
distributions has such a compression scheme, then so do the classes of products and
mixtures of those distributions. The core of our main result is showing that the
class of Gaussians in Rd has an efficient sample compression.
1
Introduction
Estimating distributions from observed data is a fundamental task in statistics that has
been studied for over a century. This task frequently arises in applied machine learning
and it is very common to assume that the distribution can be modeled using a mixture
of Gaussians. Popular software packages have implemented heuristics, such as the EM
algorithm, for learning a mixture of Gaussians. The theoretical machine learning community also has a rich literature on distribution learning. For example, the recent survey
1
of Diakonikolas (2016) considers learning of structured distributions, and the survey of
Kalai, Moitra, and Valiant (2012) focuses on mixtures of Gaussians.
This paper develops a general technique for distribution learning, then employs these
techniques in the important setting of mixtures of Gaussians. The theoretical model that
we adopt is density estimation: given i.i.d. samples from an unknown target distribution, find a distribution that is close to the target distribution in total variation (TV)
distance. Our focus is on sample complexity bounds: using as few samples as possible to
obtain a good estimate of the target distribution. For background on this model see, e.g.,
Devroye and Lugosi (2001, Chapter 5) and Diakonikolas (2016).
Our new technique for upper bounds on the sample complexity involves a form of
sample compression. If it is possible to “encode” members of a class of distributions
using a carefully chosen subset of the samples, then this yields an upper bound on the
sample complexity of distribution learning for that class. In particular, by constructing
compression schemes for mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians and general Gaussians, we
obtain new upper bounds on the sample complexity of learning with respect to these
classes, which are optimal up to logarithmic factors.
The compression framework can incorporate a notion of robustness, which leads to
sample complexity bounds for agnostic learning. Namely, if the target distribution is
close to a mixture of Gaussians (in TV distance), our method uses few samples to find a
mixture of Gaussians that is close to the target distribution (in TV distance).
1.1
Main results
In this section, all learning results refer to the problem of producing a distribution within
total variation distance ε from the target distribution.
Our first main result is an upper bound for learning mixtures of multivariate Gaussians.
This bound is tight up to logarithmic factors.
Theorem 1.1. The class of k-mixtures of d-dimensional Gaussians can be learned using
e 2 /ε2 ) samples. This result generalizes to the agnostic setting.
O(kd
Previously, the best upper bounds on the sample complexity of this problem were
e
O(kd2 /ε4 ), due to Ashtiani, Ben-David, and Mehrabian (2017), and O(k 4 d4 /ε2 ), based
on a VC-dimension bound discussed later. For the case of a single Gaussian (i.e., k=1),
a sample complexity bound of O(d2 /ε2 ) is well known (see, e.g., Ashtiani et al. (2017,
Theorem 13)).
Our second main result is a lower bound matching Theorem 1.1 up to logarithmic
factors.
2
Theorem 1.2. Any method for learning the class of k-mixtures of d-dimensional Gaus2 2
e
sians has sample complexity Ω(kd
/ε ).
2
e
Previously, the best lower bound on the sample complexity was Ω(kd/ε
) (Suresh, Orlitsky, Acharya, and
2 2
e
2014). Even for a single Gaussian (i.e., k=1), an Ω(d /ε ) lower bound was not known
prior to this work.
Our third main result is an upper bound for learning mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians, i.e., Gaussians with diagonal covariance matrix. This bound is tight up to logarithmic factors.
Theorem 1.3. The class of k-mixtures of axis-aligned d-dimensional Gaussians can be
2
e
learned using O(kd/ε
) samples. This result generalizes to the agnostic setting.
2
e
A matching lower bound of Ω(kd/ε
) samples was shown by Suresh et al. (2014).
4
e
Previously, the best known upper bounds were O(kd/ε
), due to Ashtiani et al. (2017),
4 2
3 3
2
and O((k d + k d )/ε ), based on a VC-dimension discussed later.
Computational efficiency. Although our approach for proving sample complexity upper bounds is algorithmic, our focus is not on computational efficiency. The resulting
algorithms are efficient in terms of sample complexity, but their runtime is exponential
in the dimension d and the number of mixture components k. The existence of a polynomial time algorithm for density estimation is unknown even for the class of mixtures of
axis-aligned Gaussians (Diakonikolas, Kane, and Stewart, 2017a, Question 1.1).
Even for the case of a single Gaussian, the published proofs of the O(d2/ε2 ) bound
are not algorithmically efficient. Using ideas from our proof of Theorem 1.1, we show
in Appendix B that an algorithmically efficient proof for the single Gaussian case can
be obtained simply by computing the empirical mean and covariance matrix of O(d2 /ε2 )
samples.
1.2
Related work
Distribution learning is a vast topic and many approaches have been considered in the
literature. We briefly review approaches that are most relevant to our problem.
For parametric families of distributions, a common approach is to use the samples to
estimate the parameters of the distribution, possibly in a maximum likelihood sense, or
possibly aiming to approximate the true parameters. For the specific case of mixtures
of Gaussians, there is a substantial theoretical literature on algorithms that approximate
the mixing weights, means and covariances. Kalai et al. (2012) gave a recent survey of
this literature. The strictness of this objective cuts both ways. On the one hand, a
3
successful learner uncovers substantial structure of the target distribution. On the other
hand, this objective is clearly impossible when the means and covariances are extremely
close. Thus, algorithms for parameter estimation of mixtures necessarily require some
assumptions on the target parameters. Also, the basic definition of parameter estimation
does not immediately extend to an agnostic setting, although there is literature on agnostic
parameter estimation, e.g., Lai, Rao, and Vempala (2016).
Density estimation has a long history in the statistics literature, where the focus is on
the sample complexity question; see, e.g., Devroye (1987); Devroye and Lugosi (2001) for
general background. It was first studied in the computational learning theory community
under the name PAC learning of distributions by Kearns, Mansour, Ron, Rubinfeld, Schapire, and Sellie
(1994), whose focus is on the computational complexity of the learning algorithm.
For density estimation there are various possible measures of distance between distributions, the most popular ones being the TV distance and the Kullback-Leibler (KL)
divergence. Here we focus on the TV distance since it has several appealing properties,
such as being a metric and having a natural probabilistic interpretation. In contrast, KL
divergence is not even symmetric and can be unbounded even for intuitively close distributions. For a detailed discussion on why TV is a natural choice, see Devroye and Lugosi
(2001, Chapter 5).
A popular method for distribution learning in practice is kernel density estimation
(see, e.g., Devroye and Lugosi (2001, Chapter 9)). The few rigorously proven sample
complexity bounds for this method require certain smoothness assumptions on the class
of densities (e.g., Devroye and Lugosi (2001, Theorem 9.5)). The class of Gaussians is
not universally Lipschitz and does not satisfy these assumptions, so those results do not
apply to the problems we consider.
Another elementary method for density estimation is using histogram estimators.
Straightforward calculations show that histogram estimators for mixtures of Gaussians
would result in a sample complexity that is exponential in the dimension. The same is
true for estimators based on piecewise polynomials.
The minimum distance estimate (Devroye and Lugosi, 2001, Section 6.8) is another
approach for deriving sample complexity upper bounds for distribution learning. This
approach is based on uniform convergence theory. In particular, an upper bound for any
class of distributions can be achieved by bounding the VC-dimension of an associated
set system, called the Yatracos class (see Devroye and Lugosi (2001, page 58) for the
definition). For example, Diakonikolas, Kane, and Stewart (2017b) used this approach
to bound the sample complexity of learning high-dimensional log-concave distributions.
However, for mixtures of Gaussians and axis-aligned Gaussians in Rd , the best known
VC-dimension bound (Anthony and Bartlett, 1999, Theorem 8.14) results in loose upper
bounds of O(k 4 d4 /ε2 ) and O((k 4 d2 + k 3 d3 )/ε2 ) respectively.
4
Another approach is to first approximate the mixture class using a more manageable
class such as piecewise polynomials, and then study the associated Yatracos class, see, e.g.,
Chan, Diakonikolas, Servedio, and Sun (2014). However, piecewise polynomials do a poor
job in approximating d-dimensional Gaussians, resulting in an exponential dependence on
d.
For density estimation of mixtures of Gaussians, the current best sample complexity
4
e 2 /ε4 ) for general Gaussians and O(kd/ε
e
upper bounds (in terms of k and d) are O(kd
)
for axis-aligned Gaussians, both due to Ashtiani et al. (2017). For the general Gaussian
e 2 /ε2 ) and partitions this sample
case, their method takes an i.i.d. sample of size O(kd
2 2
e
in every possible way into k subsets. Based on those partitions, k O(kd /ε ) “candidate
distributions” are generated. The problem is then reduced to learning with respect to
that finite class of candidates. Their sample complexity has a suboptimal factor of 1/ε4,
of which 1/ε2 arises in their approach for choosing the best candidate, and another factor
1/ε2 is due to the exponent in the number of candidates.
Our approach via compression schemes also ultimately reduces the problem to learning
with respect to finite classes. However, our compression technique leads to a more refined
bound. In the case of mixtures of Gaussians, one factor of 1/ε2 is again incurred due
to learning with respect to finite classes. The key is that the number of compressed
samples has no additional factor of 1/ε2, so the overall sample complexity bound has only
2
e
a O(1/ε
) dependence on ε.
As for lower bounds on the sample complexity, much fewer results are known for
learning mixtures of Gaussians. The only lower bound of which we are aware is due to
2
e
Suresh et al. (2014), who show a bound of Ω(kd/ε
) for learning mixtures of axis-aligned
Gaussians (and hence for general Gaussians as well). This bound is tight for the axisaligned case, as we show in Theorem 1.3, but loose in the general case, as we show in
Theorem 1.2.
1.3
Our techniques
We introduce a novel method for learning distributions via a form of sample compression.
Given a class of distributions, suppose there is a method for “compressing” the samples
generated by any distribution in the class. Further, suppose there exists a fixed decoder
for the class, such that given the compressed set of instances and a sequence of bits, it
approximately recovers the original distribution. In this case, if the size of the compressed
set and the number of bits is guaranteed to be small, we show that the sample complexity
of learning that class is small as well.
More precisely, say a class of distributions admits (τ, t, m) compression if there exists
a decoder function such that upon generating m i.i.d. samples from any distribution in
5
the class, we are guaranteed, with reasonable probability, to have a subset of size at most
τ of that sample, and a sequence of at most t bits, on which the decoder outputs an
approximation to the original distribution. Note that τ, t, and m can be functions of ε,
the accuracy parameter.
This definition is generalized to a stronger notion of robust compression, where the
target distribution is to be encoded using samples that are not necessarily generated from
the target itself, but are generated from a distribution that is close to the target. We
prove that robust compression implies agnostic learning. In particular, if a class admits
(τ, t, m) robust compression, then the sample complexity of agnostic learning with respect
e + (τ + t)/ε2 ) (Theorem 3.5).
to this class is bounded by O(m
An attractive property of robust compression is that it enjoys two closure properties.
Specifically, if a base class admits robust compression, then the class of k-mixtures of that
base class, as well as the class of products of the base class, are robustly compressible
(Lemmas 3.6 and 3.7).
Consequently, it suffices to provide a robust compression scheme for the class of single
Gaussian distributions in order to obtain a compression scheme for classes of mixtures
of Gaussians (and therefore, to be able to bound their sample complexity). We prove
e
e 2 ), O(d))
e
that the class of d-dimensional Gaussian distributions admits (O(d),
O(d
robust
e
compression (Lemma 4.2). The high level idea is that by generating O(d)
samples from a
Gaussian, one can get some rough sketch of the geometry of the Gaussian. In particular,
the convex hull of the points drawn from a Gaussian enclose an ellipsoid centered at the
mean and whose principal axes are the eigenvectors of the covariance matrix. Using ideas
from convex geometry and random matrix theory, we show one can in fact encode the
center of the ellipsoid and the principal axes using a convex combination of these samples.
Then we discretize the coefficients and obtain an approximate encoding.
The above results together imply tight (up to logarithmic factors) upper bounds of
2
e
e
O(kd2 /ε2 ) for mixtures of k Gaussians, and O(kd/ε
) for mixtures of k axis-aligned Gausd
sians over R . The robust compression framework we introduce is quite flexible, and can
be used to prove sample complexity upper bounds for other distribution classes as well.
Lower bound. For proving our lower bound for mixtures of Gaussians, we first prove
e 2 /ε2 ) for learning a single Gaussian. Although the approach is quite
a lower bound of Ω(d
intuitive, the details are intricate and much care is required to make a formal proof. The
2
main step is to construct a large family (of size 2Ω(d ) ) of covariance matrices such that
the associated Gaussian distributions are well-separated in terms of their total variation
distance while simultaneously ensuring that their Kullback-Leibler divergences are small.
Once this is established, we can then apply a generalized version of Fano’s inequality to
complete the proof.
6
2
To construct this family of covariance matrices, we sample 2Ω(d ) matrices from the
following probabilistic process: start with an identity covariance matrix. Then choose
a random subspace of dimension d/9 and slightly
increase the eigenvalues corresponding
√
to this eigenspace from 1 to roughly 1 + ε/ d. It is easy to bound the KL divergence
between the constructed Gaussians. To lower bound the total variation, we show that
for every pair of these distributions, there is some subspace for which a vector drawn
from one Gaussian will have slightly larger projection than a vector drawn from the other
Gaussian. Quantifying this gap will then give us the desired lower bound on the total
variation distance.
1.4
Paper outline
We set up our formal framework and notations in Section 2. In Section 3, we define
compression schemes for distributions, prove their closure properties, and show their connection with density estimation. Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.3 are proved in Section 4.
Theorem 1.2 is proved in Section 5. All omitted proofs can be found in the appendix.
2
Preliminaries
A distribution learning method or density estimation method is an algorithm that takes as
input a sequence of i.i.d. samples generated from a distribution g, and outputs (a description of) a distribution ĝ as an estimation for g. We work with continuous distributions in
this paper, and so we identify a probability distribution by its probability density function. Let f1 and f2 be two probability distributions defined over the Borel σ-algebra B.
The total variation (TV) distance between f1 and f2 is defined by
Z
1
TV(f1 , f2 ) := sup (f1 (x) − f2 (x))dx = kf1 − f2 k1 ,
2
B∈B B
R
where kf k1 := Rd |f (x)|dx is the L1 norm of f . The Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence
between f1 and f2 is defined by
Z
f1 (x)
dx.
KL(f1 k f2 ) :=
f1 (x) log
f2 (x)
Rd
In the following definitions, F is a class of probability distributions, and g is a distribution
(not necessarily in F ).
Definition 2.1 (ε-approximation, (ε, C)-approximation). A distribution ĝ is an ε-approximation
for g if kĝ − gk1 ≤ ε. A distribution ĝ is an (ε, C)-approximation for g with respect to F
if
kĝ − gk1 ≤ C · inf kf − gk1 + ε
f ∈F
7
Definition 2.2 (PAC-learning distributions, realizable setting). A distribution learning
method is called a (realizable) PAC-learner for F with sample complexity mF (ε, δ), if for
all distribution g ∈ F and all ε, δ ∈ (0, 1), given ε, δ, and a sample of size mF (ε, δ)
generated i.i.d. by that g, with probability at least 1 − δ (over the samples) the method
outputs an ε-approximation of g.
Definition 2.3 (PAC-learning distributions, agnostic setting). For C > 0, a distribution
learning method is called a C-agnostic PAC-learner for F with sample complexity mC
F (ε, δ),
if for all distributions g and all ε, δ ∈ (0, 1), given ε, δ, and a sample of size mC
F (ε, δ)
generated i.i.d. from g, with probability at least 1 − δ the method outputs an (ε, C)approximation of g w.r.t. F .
We sometimes say a class can be “C-learned in the agnostic setting” to indicate the
existence of a C-agnostic PAC-learner for the class. The case C > 1 is sometimes called
P
wi = 1 } denote the
semi -agnostic learning. Let ∆n := { (w1 , . . . , wn ) : wi ≥ 0,
n-dimensional simplex.
Definition 2.4 (k-mix(F )). Let F be a class of probability distributions. Then the class
of k-mixtures of F , written k-mix(F ), is defined as
k-mix(F ) := {
Pk
i=1 wi fi
: (w1 , . . . , wk ) ∈ ∆k , f1 , . . . , fk ∈ F }
Let d denote the dimension. A Gaussian distribution with mean µ ∈ Rd and covariance
matrix Σ ∈ Rd×d is denoted by N (µ, Σ). If Σ is a diagonal matrix, then N (µ, Σ) is called
an axis-aligned Gaussian. For a distribution g, we write X ∼ g to mean X is a random
variable with distribution g, and we write S ∼ g m to mean that S is an i.i.d. sample of
size m generated from g.
Definition 2.5. A random variable X is said to be σ-subgaussian if Pr[|X| ≥ t] ≤
2 exp(−t2 /σ 2 ) for any t > 0.
Note that if X ∼ N (0, 1) then X is
(1984, formula (7.1.13)).
√
2-subgaussian, see, e.g., Abramowitz and Stegun
Definition 2.6. Let A, B be symmetric, positive definite matrices of the same size. The
log-det divergence of A and B is defined as LD(A, B) := tr(B −1 A − I) − log det(B −1 A).
We will use kvk or kvk2 to denote the Euclidean norm
p of a vector v, kAk or kAk2 to
denote the operator norm of a matrix A, and kAkF := tr(AT A) to denote the Frobenius
norm of a matrix A. For x ∈ R, we will write (x)+ := max{0, x}.
8
3
Compression schemes and their connection with
learning
Let F be a class of distributions over a domain Z.
Definition 3.1 (distribution decoder). A distribution decoder for F is a deterministic
S∞
S
n
n
function J : ∞
n=0 {0, 1} → F , which takes a finite sequence of elements of Z
n=0 Z ×
and a finite sequence of bits, and outputs a member of F .
Definition 3.2 (robust distribution compression schemes). Let τ, t, m : (0, 1) → Z≥0 be
functions, and let r ≥ 0. We say F admits (τ, t, m) r-robust compression if there exists
a decoder J for F such that for any distribution g ∈ F , and for any distribution q on Z
with kg − qk1 ≤ r, the following holds:
For any ε ∈ (0, 1), if the sample S is drawn from q m(ε) , then with probability at
least 2/3, there exists a sequence L of at most τ (ε) elements of S, and a sequence
B of at most t(ε) bits, such that kJ (L, B) − gk1 ≤ ε.
Essentially, the definition asserts that with high probability, there should be a (small)
subset of S and some (small number of) additional bits, from which g can be approximately
reconstructed. We say that the distribution g is “encoded” with L and B, and in general
we would like to have a compression scheme of a small size. This compression scheme
is called “robust” since it requires g to be approximately reconstructed from a sample
generated from q rather than g itself.
Remark 3.3. In the definition above we required the probability of existence of L and B
to be at least 2/3, but one can boost this probability to 1 − δ by generating a sample of size
m(ε) log(1/δ).
Next we show that if a class of distributions can be compressed, then it can be learned;
thus we build the connection between robust compression and agnostic learning. We
will need the following useful result about PAC-learning of finite classes of distributions,
which immediately follows from Devroye and Lugosi (2001, Theorem 6.3) and a standard
Chernoff bound. It states that a finite class of size M can be 3-learned in the agnostic
setting using O(log(M/δ)/ε2 ) samples. Denote by [M] the set {1, 2, ..., M}. Throughout
the paper, a/bc always means a/(bc).
Theorem 3.4 (Devroye and Lugosi (2001)). There exists a deterministic algorithm that,
given candidate distributions f1 , . . . , fM , a parameter ε > 0, and log(3M 2 /δ)/2ε2 i.i.d.
samples from an unknown distribution g, outputs an index j ∈ [M] such that
kfj − gk1 ≤ 3 min kfi − gk1 + 4ε,
i∈[M ]
with probability at least 1 − δ/3.
9
The proof of the following theorem appears in Appendix C.1.
Theorem 3.5 (compressibility implies learnability). Suppose F admits (τ, t, m) r-robust
compression. Let τ ′ (ε) := τ (ε/6) + t(ε/6). Then F can be max{3, 2/r}-learned in the
agnostic setting using
1 τ ′ (ε) log(m( ε ) log(1/δ)) + log(1/δ)
′
τ
(ε)
ε
ε
6
e m
log
+
+ 2
=O
samples.
O m
6
δ
ε2
6
ε
If F admits (τ, t, m) 0-robust compression, then F can be learned in the realizable setting
using the same number of samples.
We next prove two closure properties of compression schemes. First, Lemma 3.6
below implies that if a class F of distributions can be compressed, then the class of
distributions that are formed by taking products of members of F can also be comQ
pressed. If p1 , . . . , pd are distributions over domains Z1 , . . . , Zd , then di=1 pi denotes
Qd
the standard
product distribution
nQ
o over i=1 Zi . For a class F of distributions, define
d
d :=
F
i=1 pi : p1 , . . . , pd ∈ F . The following lemma is proved in Appendix C.2.
Lemma 3.6 (compressing product distributions). If F admits (τ (ε), t(ε), m(ε)) r-robust
compression, then F d admits (dτ (ε/d), dt(ε/d), m(ε/d) log(3d)) r-robust compression.
Our next lemma implies that if a class F of distributions can be compressed, then the
class of distributions that are formed by taking mixtures of members of F can also be
compressed. The proof appears in Appendix C.3.
Lemma 3.7 (compressing mixtures). If F admits (τ (ε), t(ε), m(ε)) r-robust compression,
then k-mix(F ) admits (kτ (ε/3), kt(ε/3) + k log2 (4k/ε)), 48m(ε/3)k log(6k)/ε) r-robust
compression.
4
4.1
Upper bound: learning mixtures of Gaussians by
compression schemes
Warm-up: learning mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians by
compression schemes
In this section, we give a simple application of our compression framework to prove an
2
e
upper bound of O(kd/ε
) for the sample complexity of learning mixtures of k axis-aligned
Gaussians in the realizable setting. In the following section, we generalize these arguments
to work for general Gaussians in the agnostic setting.
10
Lemma 4.1. The class of single-dimensional Gaussians admits a (3, O(log(1/ε)), 3) 0robust compression scheme.
Proof. Let c < 1 < C be such that PrX∼N (0,1) [c < |X| < C] ≥ 0.99. Let N (µ, σ 2 )
be the target distribution. We first show how to encode σ. Let g1 , g2 ∼ N (µ, σ 2).
Then g = √12 (g1 − g2 ) ∼ N (0, σ 2 ). So with probability at least 0.99, we have σc <
|g| < σC. Conditioned on this event, this implies that there is a λ ∈ [−1/c, 1/c] such
that λg = σ. We now choose λ̂ ∈ {0, ±ε/2C 2, ±2ε/2C 2 , ±3ε/2C 2 . . . , ±1/c} satisfying
|λ̂ − λ| ≤ ε/(4C 2), and encode the standard deviation by (g1 , g2 , λ̂). The decoder then
√
estimates σ̂ := λ̂(g1 − g2 )/ 2. Note that |σ̂ − σ| ≤ |λ̂ − λ||g| ≤ σε/(4C) and that the
encoding requires two sample points and O(log(C 2 /ε)) = O(log(1/ε)) bits (for encoding
λ̂).
Now we turn to encoding µ. Let g3 ∼ N (µ, σ 2 ). Then |g3 − µ| ≤ Cσ with probability
at least 0.99. We will condition on this event, which implies existence of some η ∈ [−C, C]
such that g3 +ση = µ. We choose η̂ ∈ {0, ±ε/2, ±2ε/2, ±3ε/2 . . . , ±C} such that |η̂−η| ≤
ε/4, and encode the mean by (g3 , η̂). The decoder estimates µ̂ := g3 + σ̂ η̂. Again, note
that |µ̂ − µ| = |ση − σ̂η̂| ≤ |ση − ση̂| + |ση̂ − σ̂ η̂| ≤ σε/2. Moreover, encoding the mean
requires one sample point and O(log(1/ε)) bits.
To summarize, the decoder has |µ̂ − µ| ≤ σε/2 and |σ̂ − σ| ≤ σε/2. Plugging these
bounds into Lemma A.4 gives kN (µ, σ 2) − N (µ̂, σ̂ 2 )k1 ≤ ε, as required.
To complete the proof of Theorem 1.3 in the realizable setting, we note that Lemma 4.1
combined with Lemma 3.6 implies that the class of axis-aligned Gaussians in Rd admits a
(O(d), O(d log(d/ε)), O(log(3d))) 0-robust compression scheme. Then, by Lemma 3.7, the
class of mixtures of k axis-aligned Gaussians admit a (O(kd), O(kd log(d/ε) + k log(k/ε)),
O(k log(k) log(3d)/ε)) 0-robust compression scheme. Applying Theorem 3.5 implies that
2
e
the class of k-mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians in Rd can be learned using O(kd/ε
)
many samples in the realizable setting.
4.2
Agnostic learning mixtures of Gaussians by compression
schemes
e 2 /ε2) for the sample complexity of learning
In this section we prove an upper bound of O(kd
2
e
mixtures of k Gaussians in d dimensions, and an upper bound of O(kd/ε
) for the sample
complexity of learning mixtures of k axis-aligned Gaussians, both in the agnostic sense.
The heart of the proof is to show that Gaussians have robust compression schemes in any
dimension.
Lemma 4.2. For any positive integer d, the class of d-dimensional Gaussians admits an
O(d log(2d)), O(d2 log(2d) log(d/ε)), O(d log(2d)) 2/3-robust compression scheme.
11
Remark 4.3. This lemma can be boosted to give an r-robust compression schemes for
any r < 1 at the expense of worse constants hidden in the big Oh, but this will not yield
any improvement in the final results.
Remark 4.4. In the special case d = 1, there also exists a (4, 1, O(1/ε)) (i.e., constant
size) 0.773-robust compression scheme using completely different ideas. The proof appears
in Appendix D.4. Remarkably, this compression scheme has constant size, as the value
of τ + t is independent of ε (unlike Lemma 4.2). This scheme could be used instead
of Lemma 4.2 in the proof of Theorem 1.3, although it would not improve the sample
complexity bound asymptotically.
Proof of Theorem 1.1. Combining Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 3.7 implies that the class
of k-mixtures of d-dimensional Gaussians admits a
O(kd log(2d)), O(kd2 log(2d) log(d/ε) + k log(k/ε)), O(dk log k log(2d)/ε)
e
2/3-robust compression scheme. Applying Theorem 3.5 with m(ε) = O(dk/ε)
and τ ′ (ε) =
e 2 k) shows that the sample complexity of learning this class is O(kd
e 2 /ε2). This proves
O(d
Theorem 1.1.
Proof of Theorem 1.3. Let G denote the class of 1-dimensional Gaussian distributions.
By Lemma 4.2, G admits an (O(1), O(log(1/ε)), O(1)) 2/3-robust compression scheme. By
Lemma 3.6, the class G d admits a (O(d), O(d log(d/ε)), O(log(3d))) 2/3-robust compression scheme. Then, by Lemma 3.7, the class k-mix(G d ) admits (O(kd), O(kd log(d/ε) +
k log(k/ε)), O(k log(k) log(3d)/ε)) 2/3-robust compression. Applying Theorem 3.5 implies
that the class of k-mixtures of axis-aligned Gaussians in Rd can be 3-agnostically learned
2
e
using O(kd/ε
) many samples.
4.3
Proof of Lemma 4.2
Let Q denote the target distribution, which satisfies kQ − N (µ, Σ)k1 ≤ 2/3 for some
Gaussian N (µ, Σ) which we are to encode. Note that this implies TV(Q, N (µ, Σ)) ≤ 1/3.
Remark 4.5. The case of rank-deficient Σ can easily be reduced to the case of full-rank Σ.
If the rank of Σ is k < d, any X ∼ N (µ, Σ) lies in some affine subspace S of dimension
k. Thus, any X ∼ Q lies in S with probability at least 2/3. With high probability, after
seeing 10d samples from Q, at least k + 1 points from S will appear in the sample. We
encode S using these samples, and for the rest of the process we work in this affine space,
and discard outside points. Hence, we may assume Σ has full rank d.
We first prove a lemma that is similar to known results in random matrix theory (see
Litvak, Pajor, Rudelson, and Tomczak-Jaegermann, 2005, Corollary 4.1), but is tailored
12
for our purposes. Its proof appears in Appendix D.1. Let S d−1 :=
and B2d := y ∈ Rd : kyk ≤ 1 .
y ∈ Rd : kyk = 1
Lemma 4.6. Let q1 , . . . , qm be i.i.d. samples from a distribution Q where TV(Q, N (0, Id)) ≤
2/3. Let
√
T := { ±qi : kqi k ≤ 4 d }.
Then for a large enough constant C > 0, if m ≥ Cd(1 + log d) then
1 d
Pr
B 6⊆ conv(T ) ≤ 1/6.
20 2
P
P
Suppose Σ = di=1 vi viT , where the vi vectors are orthogonal. Let Ψ := di=1 vi viT /kvi k.
Note that both Σ and Ψ are positive definite, and that Σ = Ψ2 . Moreover, it is easy to
P
P
see that Σ−1 = di=1 vi viT /kvi k4 and Ψ−1 = di=1 vi viT /kvi k3 .
The following lemma is proved in Appendix D.2.
Lemma 4.7. Let C > 0 be a sufficiently large constant. Given m = 2Cd(1 + log d)
samples S from Q, where TV(Q, N (µ, Σ)) ≤ 1/3, with probability at least 2/3, one can
encode vectors vb1 , . . . , b
vd , µ
b ∈ Rd satisfying
kΨ−1 (b
vj − vj )k ≤ ε/6d2
∀j ∈ [d],
and
kΨ−1 (b
µ − µ)k ≤ ε,
using O(d2 log(2d) log(d/ε)) bits and the points in S.
Lemma 4.2 now follows immediately from the following lemma, which is proved in
Appendix D.3.
P
Lemma 4.8. Suppose Σ = Ψ2 = i∈[d] vi viT , where vi are orthogonal and Σ is full rank,
and that
kΨ−1 (b
vj − vj )k ≤ ρ ≤ 1
∀j ∈ [d],
and
kΨ−1 (b
µ − µ)k ≤ ζ.
Then
TV(N (µ,
X
i∈[d]
vi viT ), N (b
µ,
X
i∈[d]
13
vbi b
viT )) ≤
p
9d3 ρ2 + ζ 2/2.
5
The lower bound for Gaussians and their mixtures
e 2 /ε2 ) for learning a single Gaussian, and
In this section, we establish a lower bound of Ω(d
2 2
e
then lift it to obtain a lower bound of Ω(kd
/ε ) for learning mixtures of k Gaussians in
d dimensions. Both our lower bounds consider the realizable setting (so they also hold in
the agnostic setting).
Our lower bound is based on the following lemma, which follows from Fano’s inequality
in information theory (see Lemma E.1). Its proof appears in Appendix E.1.
Lemma 5.1. Let F be a class of distributions such that for all small enough ε > 0 there
exist N densities f1 , . . . , fN ∈ F with
KL(fi k fj ) ≤ κ(ε) and TV(fi , fj ) = Ω(ε)
∀i 6= j ∈ [N].
Then any algorithm that learns F to within total variation distance ε with success probability at least 2/3 has sample complexity Ω (log N/(κ(ε) log(1/ε))).
Theorem 5.2. Any algorithm that learns a general Gaussian in Rd in the realizable setting
within
total
variation distance ε and with success probability 2/3 has sample complexity
d2
Ω ε2 log3 (1/ε) .
2
Proof. Let r = 9 and λ = Θ(εd−1/2 log(1/ε)). Guided by Lemma 5.1, we will build 2Ω(d )
Gaussian distributions of the form fa := N (0, Σa ) where Σa = Id + λUa UaT , where each
Ua is a d × d/r matrix with orthonormal columns. To apply Lemma 5.1, we need to give
an upper bound on the KL-divergence between any two fa and fb , and a lower bound on
their total variation distance. Upper bounding the KL divergence is easy: by Lemma A.1
and since kUaT Ub k2F ≥ 0,
λ
Ua UaT )(I + λUb UbT ) − I)
1+λ
λ
λ2
= Tr(λUb UbT −
Ua UaT −
Ua UaT Ub UbT )
1+λ
1+λ
λ2
λ
(d/r) −
kU T Ub k2F
= λ(d/r) −
1+λ
1+λ a
λ2 d
≤
≤ λ2 d/(2r) = O(ε2 log2 (1/ε)),
r + rλ
2 KL(fa k fb ) = Tr(Σ−1
a Σb − I) = Tr((I −
as required.
Our next goal is to give a lower bound on the total variation distance between fa and
fb . For this, we would like the matrices {Ua } to be “spread out,” in the sense that their
columns should be nearly orthogonal. This is formalized in Lemma 5.3 below, where we
d
show if we choose the Ua randomly, we can achieve kUaT Ub k2F ≤ 2r
for any a 6= b. Then,
14
if Sa is the subspace spanned by the columns of Ua , then we expect that a Gaussian
drawn from N (0, Σa ) should have a slightly larger projection onto Sa then a Gaussian
drawn from N (0, Σb). This will then allow us to give a lower bound on the total variation
distance between N (0, Σa ) and N (0, Σ
b ). √Moreprecisely, in Lemma 5.4 we show that
λ d/r
d
T
2
√
= Ω(ε), completing the proof.
kUa Ub kF ≤ 2r implies TV(fa , fb ) = Ω log(r/λ
d)
We defer the proofs of the following lemmas to Appendix E.2 and Appendix E.3,
respectively.
2
Lemma 5.3. Suppose d ≥ r ≥ 9. Then there exists 2Ω(d /r) orthonormal d × d/r matrices
d
{Ua } such that for any a 6= b we have kUaT Ub k2F ≤ 2r
.
√
d/r ∈ (0, 1/3). If kUaT Ub k2F ≤ d/(2r), then
Lemma 5.4. Suppose
that
λ
≤
1
≤
r,
and
λ
√
λ d/r
√
TV(fa , fb ) = Ω log(r/λ
.
d)
Finally, in Appendix E.4 we prove our lower bound for mixtures.
Theorem 5.5. Any algorithm that learns a mixture of k general Gaussians in Rd in the
realizable setting within total
distance ε and with success probability at least 2/3
variation
kd2
has sample complexity Ω ε2 log3 (1/ε) .
6
Further discussion
A central open problem in distribution learning and density estimation is characterizing the sample complexity of learning a distribution class. An insight from supervised
learning theory is that the sample complexity of learning a class (of concepts, functions,
or distributions) may be proportional to some kind of intrinsic dimension of the class
divided by ε2 , where ε is the error tolerance. For the case of agnostic binary classification, the intrinsic dimension is captured by the VC-dimension of the concept class
(see Vapnik and Chervonenkis (1971); Blumer, Ehrenfeucht, Haussler, and Warmuth (1989)).
For the case of distribution learning with respect to ‘natural’ parametric classes, we expect this dimension to be equal to the number of parameters. In this paper, we showed
that this is indeed the case for the class of Gaussians, axis-aligned Gaussians, and their
mixtures in any dimension.
In binary classification, the combinatorial notion of Littlestone-Warmuth compression has been shown to be sufficient (Littlestone and Warmuth, 1986) and necessary
(Moran and Yehudayoff, 2016) for learning. In this work, we showed that the new but
related notion of robust distribution compression is sufficient for distribution learning.
Whether the existence of compression schemes is necessary for learning an arbitrary class
of distributions remains an intriguing open problem.
15
We would like to mention that while it may first seem that the VC-dimension of the
Yatracos set associated with a class of distributions can characterize its sample complexity,
it is not hard to come up with examples where this VC-dimension is infinite while the class
can be learned with finite samples. Covering numbers do not work, either; for instance the
class of Gaussians do not have a bounded covering number in the TV metric, nevertheless
it is learnable with finite samples.
A concept related to compression is that of core-sets. In a sense, core-sets can be
viewed as a special case of compression, where the decoder is required to be the empirical
error minimizer. See the work of (Lucic, Faulkner, Krause, and Feldman, 2017) for using
core-sets in maximum likelihood estimation.
A
Standard results
Lemma A.1 (Rasmussen and Williams (2006, Equation A.23)). For two full-rank Gaussians N (µ, Σ) and N (µ′ , Σ′ ), their KL divergence is
KL(N (µ, Σ) k N (µ′, Σ′ )) =
1
Tr(Σ−1 Σ′ − I) + (µ − µ′ )T Σ−1 (µ − µ′ ) − log det(Σ′ Σ−1 ) .
2
Lemma A.2 (Pinsker’s Inequality (Tsybakov, 2009, Lemma 2.5)). For any two distributions A and B, we have 2 TV(A, B)2 ≤ KL(A k B).
Lemma A.3. For two full-rank Gaussians N (µ, Σ) and N (µ′, Σ′ ), their total variation
distance is bounded by
2 TV(N (µ, Σ), N (µ′, Σ′ ))2 ≤ KL(N (µ, Σ k N (µ′, Σ′ ))
1
=
LD(Σ, Σ′ ) + (µ − µ′ )T Σ−1 (µ − µ′ ) .
2
Proof. Follows from Lemma A.1 and Lemma A.2.
Lemma A.4. For any µ, σ, µ
b, σ
b ∈ R with |b
µ − µ| ≤ εσ and |b
σ − σ| ≤ εσ and ε ∈ [0, 2/3]
we have
kN (µ, σ 2) − N (b
µ, σ
b2 )k1 ≤ 2ε.
Proof. By Lemma A.3,
σ
b2
4 TV(N (µ, σ 2), N (b
µ, σ
b2 ))2 ≤ 2 −1−log
σ
2
2 !
σ
b2
|µ − µ
b|2
σ
b
σ
b
+ε2 .
+
≤
−1−log
2
2
σ
σ
σ
σ
Since z := σ
b/σ ∈ [1−ε, 1+ε] and ε ≤ 2/3, using the inequality x2 −1−log(x2 ) ≤ 3(x−1)2
valid for all |x − 1| ≤ 2/3, we find
1
1
TV(N (µ, σ 2), N (b
µ, σ
b2 ))2 ≤ (3(z − 1)2 + ε2 ) ≤ (4ε2) = ε2 .
4
4
16
And the lemma follows since the L1 distance is twice the TV distance.
Fact A.5. Let X and Y be arbitrary random variables on the same space. For any
function f , we have
TV(f (X), f (Y )) ≤ TV(X, Y ).
Proof. This follows from the observation that
Pr [f (X) ∈ A] − Pr [f (Y ) ∈ A] = Pr X ∈ f −1 (A) − Pr Y ∈ f −1 (A) ≤ TV(X, Y ),
so taking supremum of the left-hand side gives the result.
Lemma A.6 (Laurent and Massart (2000, Lemma 1)). Let X have the chi-squared disP
tribution with parameter d; that is, X = di=1 Xi2 where the Xi are i.i.d. standard normal.
Then,
√
Pr[X − d ≥ 2 dt + 2t] ≤ exp(−t) and
√
Pr[d − X ≥ 2 dt] ≤ exp(−t).
d.
The first inequality above implies, in particular, that Pr[X ≥ 16d] ≤ exp(−3) for any
Lemma A.7. Let g1 , . . . , gm ∈ Rd be independent samples from N (0, I). For ε ∈ [0, 1],
Pr[
Proof. Note that X =
1
m
Pm
√1
m
i=1 gi
Pm
i=1 gi
2
≥ (1 + ε)d/m] ≤ exp(−ε2 d/9).
2
has the chi-squared distribution with parameter d.
2
Applying Lemma A.6 with t = ε d/9 shows that Pr[X ≥ (1 + ε)d] ≤ exp(−ε2 d/9).
Lemma A.8 (Theorem 3.1.1 in Vershynin (2018)).
Let g ∼ N (0, Id). Then (kgk2 −
√
is O(1)-subgaussian. Consequently, (kgk2 − d)+ is also O(1)-subgaussian.
√
d)
Lemma A.9 (Proposition 2.5.2 in Vershynin (2018)). A random variable X is σ-subgaussian
if and only if supp≥1 p−1/2 (E|X|p)1/p ≤ Cσ for some global constant C > 0.
Lemma A.10 (Hoeffding’s Inequality, Proposition 2.6.1 in Vershynin (2018)). Let X1 , . . . , Xn
be independent, mean-zero random variables and suppose Xi is σi -subgaussian. Then, for
some global constant c > 0 and any t ≥ 0,
#
"
X
−ct2
Pr
Xi > t ≤ 2 exp P 2 .
i σi
i
17
Lemma A.11 (Bernstein’s Inequality, Theorem 2.8.1 in Vershynin (2018)). Let g1 , . . . , gn ∼
N (0, 1) and a1 , . . . , an > 0. Then, there is a global constant c > 0 such that for every
t ≥ 0,
#
" n
n
X
X
t2
t
2
Pr
.
ai gi −
ai ≥ t ≤ 2 exp −c min Pn 2 ,
i=1 ai maxi ai
i=1
i=1
Theorem A.12 (Gordon’s Theorem, Theorem 5.32 in Vershynin (2012)). Let G be a m×n
√
√
matrix with entries independently drawn from N (0, 1). Then Eσmin (G) ≥ m − n.
Lemma A.13 (Corollary 5.50 and Remark 5.51 in Vershynin (2012)). Let X1 , . . . , Xm ∼
N (0, Σ), where Σ is d × d, and let 0 < ε < 1 < t. If m ≥ C(t/ε)2 d, then with probability
1 − 2 exp(−t2 d) we have
m
1 X
Xi XiT − Σ ≤ εkΣk.
m i=1
Lemma A.14 (Corollary 4.2.13 in Vershynin (2018)). For any ε ∈ (0, 1), there exists an
ε-net for B2d of size (3/ε)d .
B
Efficient algorithm for learning a single Gaussian
by empirical mean/covariance estimation
In this section we give a simple algorithm for learning a single high dimensional Gaussian,
with sample complexity O(d2/ε2 ) and computational complexity O(d4/ε2 ).
Lemma B.1. Let v1 , . . . , vm ∈ Rd be independent samples from N (µ, Σ). Let v̄ =
Pm
1
i=1 vi . Then
m
Pr[(v̄ − µ)T Σ−1 (v̄ − µ) ≥ 2d/m] ≤ exp(−d/9).
Proof. Let gi = Σ−1/2 (vi − µ), so that g1 , . . . , gm are independent samples from N (0, I).
Then
Pr (v̄ − µ)T Σ−1 (v̄ − µ) ≥ (1 + ε)d/m = Pr
1
m
Pm
i=1 gi
≤ exp(−ε2 d/9),
2
≥ (1 + ε)d/m
by Lemma A.7.
We write B A if A−B is a positive semidefinite matrix. Observe that, x−1−log x ≤
(x − 1)2 for any x ∈ [1/2, ∞).
18
Lemma B.2. Let A, B be symmetric, positive definite matrices, satisfying (1 − α)B
A (1 + α)B for some α ∈ [0, 1/2]. Then LD(A, B) ≤ dα2.
Proof. Let λ1 , . . . , λd be the eigenvalues of B −1 A. By the hypothesis, each λi ∈ [1 − α, 1 +
α]. So,
LD(A, B) = tr(B
−1
A − I) − log det(B
−1
A) =
d
X
i=1
(λi − 1) − log
d
d
X
X
(λi − 1)2 ≤ dα2 .
(λi − 1 − log(λi )) ≤
=
d
Y
λi
i=1
i=1
i=1
Our result immediately follows from the following theorem.
Theorem B.3. Let m = Cd2 /ε2 for a large enough constant C. Let v1 , . . . , vm be i.i.d.
P
Pm
1
T
samples from N (µ, Σ). Let µ̃ = m1 m
i=1 vi and Σ̃ = m
i=1 vi vi respectively be the
empirical mean and the empirical covariance matrix. Then TV(N (µ̃, Σ̃), N (µ, Σ)) ≤ ε
with probability at least 1 − 3 exp(−d/9).
Proof. We will show that, with probability at least 1 − 3 exp(−d/9), KL(N (µ̃, Σ̃) k
N (µ, Σ)) ≤ ε2 , and the theorem follows from Pinsker’s inequality (Lemma A.2). By
e −Σ ≤
standard concentration for Gaussian matrices (see Lemma A.13) we have Σ
√
ε/ d =: α with probability at least 1 − 2 exp(−d). That is, (1 − α)Σ Σ̃ (1 + α)Σ.
Applying Lemma B.2 shows that LD(Σ̃, Σ) ≤ dα2 = ε2 . Next, by Lemma B.1 we have
(µ̃ − µ)T Σ−1 (µ̃ − µ) ≤ 2d/m = ε2 /18d with probability at least 1 − exp(−d/9). So
KL(N (µ̃, Σ̃) k N (µ, Σ)) =
1
LD(Σ̃, Σ) + (µ̃ − µ)T Σ−1 (µ̃ − µ) ≤ ε2 ,
2
with probability at least 1 − 3 exp(−d/9).
It is easy to see that, by multiplying the sample size by log(1/δ), one can boost the
success probability to 1 − δ, for any δ ∈ (0, 1).
C
C.1
Omitted proofs from Section 3
Proof of Theorem 3.5
We give the proof for the agnostic case. The proof for the realizable case is similar. Let q be
the target distribution that the samples are being generated from. Let α = inf f ∈F kf −qk1
19
be the approximation error of q with respect to F . The goal of the learner is to find a
distribution ĥ such that kĥ − qk1 ≤ max{3, 2/r} · α + ε.
First, consider the case α ≤ r. In this case, we develop a learner that finds a distribuε
tion ĥ such that kĥ−qk1 ≤ 3α+ε. Let g ∈ F be a distribution such that kg −qk1 ≤ α+ 12
(such a g exists by the definition of α). By assumption, F admits (τ, t, m) compression.
Let J denote the corresponding decoder. Given ε, the learner first asks for an i.i.d. sample
S ∼ q m(ε/6)·log(2/δ) . By the definition of robust compression, we know that with probability
at least 1 − δ/2, there exist L ∈ S τ (ε/6) and B ∈ {0, 1}t(ε/6) such that kJ (L, B) − gk ≤ ε/6
(see Remark 3.3). Let h∗ := J (L, B).
The learner is of course unaware of L and B. However, given the sample S, it can
try all of the possibilities for L and B and create a candidate set of distributions. More
concretely, let H = {J (L, B) : L ∈ S τ (ε/6) , B ∈ {0, 1}t(ε/6) }. Note that
′
|H| ≤ (m(ε/6) log(2/δ))τ (ε/6) 2t(ε/6) ≤ (m(ε/6) log(2/δ))τ (ε) .
Since H is finite, we can use the algorithm of Theorem 3.4 to find a good candidate ĥ
from H. In particular, we set the accuracy parameter in Theorem 3.4 to be ε/16 and the
confidence parameter to be δ/2. In this case, Theorem 3.4 requires
′
τ (ε) log(m( 6ε ) log( 1δ )) + log( 1δ )
log(6|H|2/δ)
e ′ (ε)/ε2 )
= O(τ
=O
2
2
2(ε/16)
ε
additional samples, and its output ĥ will be an (ε,3)-approximation of q:
kĥ − qk1 ≤ 3kh∗ − qk1 + 4
ε
ε
ε
≤ 3(kh∗ − gk1 + kg − qk1 ) + ≤ 3(ε/6 + (α + ε/12)) +
16
4
4
≤ 3α + ε.
′
e
Note that the above procedure uses O(m(ε/6)
+ τ ε(ε)
2 ) samples, and the probability of
failure is at most δ (i.e., the probability of either H not containing a good h∗ , or the failure
of Theorem 3.4 in choosing a good candidate among H, is bounded by δ/2 + δ/2 = δ).
The other case, α > r, is trivial: the learner outputs some distribution b
h. Since b
h and
2
b
q are density functions, we have kh − qk1 ≤ 2 < · α < max{3, 2/r} · α + ε.
r
C.2
Proof of Lemma 3.6
The following proposition is standard.
Proposition C.1 (Lemma 3.3.7 in Reiss (1989)). For i ∈ [d], let pi and qi be probability
P
distributions over the same domain Z. Then kΠdi=1 pi − Πdi=1 qi k1 ≤ di=1 kpi − qi k1 .
20
Proof of Lemma 3.6. Let G = Πdi=1 gi be an arbitrary element of F d . Let Q be an
arbitrary distribution over Z d , subject to kG − Qk1 ≤ r. Let q1 , . . . , qd be the marginal
distributions of Q on the d components. First, observe that, since projection onto a
coordinate cannot increase the total variation distance (see Fact A.5), we have kqj −gj k1 ≤
r for each j ∈ [d].
We know that F admits (τ, t, m) r-robust compression. Call the corresponding decoder
J , and let m0 := m(ε/d) log(3d), and S ∼ Qm0 . The goal is then to encode an εapproximation of G using dτ (ε/d) elements of S and dt(ε/d) bits.
Note that each element of S is a d-dimensional vector. For each i ∈ [d], let Si ∈ Z m0
be the set of the ith components of elements of S. By definition of qi , we have Si ∼ qim0 for
each i. Thus, for each i ∈ [d], since kqi −gi k ≤ r, with probability at least 1−1/3d there exists a sequence Li of at most τ (ε/d) elements of Si , and a sequence Bi of at most t(ε/d) bits,
such that kJ (Li , Bi ) − gi k1 ≤ ε/d. By the union bound, this assertion holds for all i ∈ [d],
with probability at least 2/3. We may encode these L1 , . . . , Ld , B1 , . . . , Bd using dτ (ε/d)
elements of S and dt(ε/d) bits. Our decoder for F d then extracts L1 , . . . , Ld , B1 , . . . , Bd
Q
from these elements and bits, and then outputs di=1 J (Li , Bi ) ∈ F d . Finally, ProposiP
tion C.1 gives kΠdi=1 J (Li , Bi ) − Gk1 ≤ di=1 kJ (Li , Bi ) − gi k1 ≤ d × ε/d ≤ ε, completing
the proof.
C.3
Proof of Lemma 3.7
We will need the following standard proposition.
Proposition C.2. Let g and g ∗ be probability densities with kg − g ∗k1 = ρ and g ∗ =
P
w f , with (w1 , . . . , wk ) ∈ ∆k and where each fi is a density. Then we may write
i∈[k]
P i i
g = i∈[k] wi Gi , such that each Gi is a density, and for each i we have kfi − Gi k1 ≤ ρ.
Proof. Write
∗
g =g +h=
k
X
wi fi + h =
i=1
k
X
wi (fi + h)
(1)
i=1
with khk1 = ρ. Note that fi + h is not necessarily a probability density function. Let D
denote the set of probability density functions, that is, the set of nonnegative functions
with unit L1 norm. Note that this is a convex set. Since projection is a linear operator, by
P
projecting both sides of (1) onto D we find g = ki=1 wi Gi , where Gi is the L1 projection
of fi + h onto D (since g ∈ D, the projection of g onto D is itself). Also, since fi ∈ D
and projection onto a convex set does not increases distances, we have
kfi − Gi k1 ≤ kfi − (fi + h)k1 = khk1 = ρ,
as required.
21
Proof of Lemma 3.7. Let g be the distribution from which we have 48m(ε/3)k log(6k)/ε
samples, and suppose g ∗ ∈ k-mix(F ) is the distribution to be compressed, so kg−g ∗ k1 ≤ r.
P
Thus we have g ∗ = i∈[k] wi fi , with each fi ∈ F , and (w1 , . . . , wk ) ∈ ∆k . By ProposiP
tion C.2, we also have g = i∈[k] wi Gi for some distributions G1 , . . . , Gk , such that for
each i we have kfi − Gi k1 ≤ r. We view g as a mixture of these k distributions, so the
samples from g can be partitioned into k parts, so that samples from the ith part have
distribution Gi . We compress each of the parts individually.
Moreover, we compress the mixing weights w1 , . . . , wk using bits, as follows. Consider
an (ε/3k)-net in ℓ∞ for ∆k , of size (1 + 3k/ε)k . Such a net can be obtained from a mesh
of grid-size ε/3k for [0, 1]k , and projecting each of its points onto ∆k . Let (w
b1 , . . . , w
bk ) be
an element in the net that has
k(w
b1 , . . . , w
bk ) − (w1 , . . . , wk )k∞ ≤ ε/3k;
then, wi − wbi ≤ ε/3k for all i. Moreover, the particular element (w
b1 , . . . , w
bk ) of the net
k
can be encoded using log2 ((1 + 3k/ε) ) ≤ k log2 (4k/ε) bits.
For any i ∈ [k], we say component i is negligible if wi ≤ ε/(6k). Since the total
number of samples is 48m(ε/3)k log(6k)/ε, by a standard Chernoff bound combined with
a union bound over the k components, with probability at least 5/6, for each non-negligible
component i, we have at least m(ε/3) log(6k) samples from i. Let i be a non-negligible
component. Since F admits (τ, t, m) robust compression and fi ∈ F and kfi − Gi k1 ≤ r,
with probability at least 1 − 1/6k there exists τ (ε/3) samples from part i and t(ε/3) bits,
from which the decoder can construct a distribution fbi with kfi −fbi k1 ≤ ε/3. Using a union
bound over the k components, this is true uniformly over all non-negligible components,
with probability at least 5/6. (Note that, for negligible components i, there is no guarantee
P b
about fbi .) Hence, given the mixing weights w
b1 , . . . , w
bk , the decoder outputs
w
bi fi .
The total number of instances used to encode is kτ (ε/3). Similarly, the total number
of used bits is not more than kt(ε/3) + k log2 (4k/ε). Thus to complete the proof of the
P
P b
lemma, we need only show that k wi fi − w
bi fi k1 ≤ ε. Let L ⊆ [k] denote the set of
negligible components. We have
X
(w
bi fbi − wi fi )
i∈[k]
≤
1
≤
≤2
X
i∈[k]
X
i∈L
X
wi (fbi − fi )
wi (fbi − fi )
wi +
i∈L
X
+
X
(w
bi − wi )fbi
i∈[k]
1
+
1
X
i∈L
/
wi (ε/3) +
i∈L
/
wi (fbi − fi )
X
i∈[k]
completing the proof of the lemma.
1
+
1
X
i∈[k]
|w
bi − wi | fbi
1
ε/3k × 1 ≤ ε/3 + ε/3 + ε/3 = ε,
22
D
D.1
Omitted proofs from Section 4
Proof of Lemma 4.6
First we show the following proposition implies
max|h y, q i| ≥
q∈S
1
20
1
Bd
20 2
⊆ conv(T ):
∀y ∈ S d−1 .
(2)
For, let P := conv(T ). Its polar is P ◦ = y ∈ Rd : |h y, q i| ≤ 1 ∀q ∈ T . So (2) implies
1
)B2d .
P ◦ ⊆ 20B2d . As polarity reverses containment, we obtain P ⊇ (20B2d )◦ = ( 20
We now bound the probability that (2) fails. For this, let g ∼ N (0, Id) and let
we
Xy := h y, g i. Notice that Xy ∼ N (0, 1). Since the pdf of Xy is bounded above by 1, √
1
have Pr |Xy | ≤ 10 ≤ 1/5. Moreover, by Lemma A.6, the probability that kgk2 ≥ 4 d
is ≤ exp(−3). Hence
√
1
∨ kgk2 ≥ 4 d ≤ 1/5 + exp(−3) < 0.25.
Pr |Xy | ≤
10
√
1
Now let Yy,i := h y, qi i and let Ey,i be the event {|Yy,i | ≤ 10
∨ kqi k > 4 d}. As
TV(Q, N (0, Id)) ≤ 2/3, we have Pr[Ey,i ] ≤ 0.25 + 2/3 < 0.92. Thus
^
Pr
Ey,i < (0.92)m
i∈[m]
√
√
Let N be an (1/80 d)-net of S d−1 with |N| ≤ (240 d)d . By a union
since
√ d bound,
m
m ≥ Cd(1+log d) for C large enough, with probability at least 1−(240
√ d) (0.92) ≥ 5/6,
1
for all y ∈ N there exists i ∈ [m] such that |Yy,i | ≥ 10 and kqi k ≤ 4 d.
√
Suppose this event holds.√ Let y ∈ S d−1 , and let y ′ ∈ N satisfy ky − y ′k2 ≤ 1/80 d.
1
. These imply ±qi ∈ T and
Let qi be such that kqi k ≤ 4 d and |Yy′ ,i | ≥ 10
√
1
|Yy,i | ≥ |Yy′ ,i | − kqi k/80 d ≥ 1/10 − 1/20 = ,
20
as required.
D.2
Proof of Lemma 4.7
Let X1 , . . . , X2m be the samples, and let Yi := √12 Ψ−1 (X2i − X2i−1 ) for i ∈ [m]. Observe
that if X2i and X2i−1 were N (µ, Σ), then √12 Ψ−1 (X2i − X2i−1 ) would have been N (0, I).
Since X2i and X2i−1 have TV distance at most 1/3 from N (µ, Σ), Yi has TV distance at
most 2/3 from N (0, I) (this can be seen, e.g., by the coupling characterization of the TV
23
√
distance). Let I := {i ∈ [m] : kYi k ≤ 4 d}. By Lemma 4.6, with probability ≥ 5/6 we
have
1 d
B ⊆ conv{±Yi : i ∈ I}
C 2
with C = 20. We give the encoding for b
vj conditioned on this event.
Fix j ∈ [d]. Observe that Ψ−1 vj = vj /kvj k has unit norm, so we can write
X
Ψ−1 vj /C =
θj,i Yi
i∈[m]
for some vector θj ∈ [−1, 1]m supported on I. Applying Ψ to both sides, we obtain
C X
θj,i (X2i − X2i−1 ).
vj = √
2 i∈[m]
For encoding vbj , consider an (ε/24Cmd3)-net for [−1, 1]m in ℓ∞ distance. The size of the
net is (48Cmd3 /ε)m , so any element of the net can be described using O(m log(d/ε)) bits.
Let θbj be an element in the net that is closest to θj subject to support(θbj ) ⊆ I, and let
P
vj := √C2 i∈[m] θbj,i (X2i − X2i−1 ). We have,
b
m
C X
(θj,i − θbj,i )Ψ−1 (X2i − X2i−1 )k
kΨ−1 (b
vj − vj )k = √ k
2 i=1
√
C
≤ √ m(max |θj,i − θbj,i |)(max 2kYi k)
i
i∈I
2
√
√
C
≤ √ m(ε/24Cmd3 )(4 2 d) ≤ ε/6d2,
2
as required. The total number of bits used to encode each vbj is O(m log(d/ε)), giving a
total number of O(d2 log(2d) log(d/ε)) bits for encoding them all.
We next describe the encoding of µ
b. Let Zi := Ψ−1 (Xi − µ) and observe that Zi has
a distribution with TV distance at most 2/3 to N (0, I). So, using Lemma A.6,
p
√
Pr[kZi k ≥ 4 d] ≤ exp(−3) + 1/3 < 1/6,
√
which means, with probability at least 5/6, min{kZ1 k, kZ2k} ≤ 4 d. We give an encoding
for µ
b provided this event occurs.
√
P
Without loss of generality, assume kZ1 k ≤ 4 d, and suppose Z1 = j∈[d] λj ej , {ei }
P
P 2
being the standard basis. This implies µ = X1 − j∈[d] λj vj , with
λj ≤ 16d2 . Consider
√ d
an (ε/3d)-net for 4 dB2 of size (36d2/ε)d , and let b
λ be the closest element to λ in this
P
b
net. We encode µ
b = X1 − j∈[d] λj vbj . Note that this requires O(d log(d/ε)) more bits,
which is dominated by the number of bits for encoding the b
vj .
24
Finally, observe that,
kΨ−1 (b
µ − µ)k = k
≤
X
(λbj − λj )Ψ−1 (vj − vbj )k
j
X
j
bj )Ψ−1 vj k
kλbj (Ψ−1 vj − Ψ−1 vbj ) + (λj − λ
n
o
bj |kΨ−1 vj k
≤ d max |λbj |kΨ−1vj − Ψ−1 b
vj k + |λj − λ
j
√
ε
≤ d · 4 d · 2 + d(ε/3d) ≤ ε,
6d
as required.
D.3
Proof of Lemma 4.8
b :=
Let Σ
P
i
vi vbiT . We will show that
b
b ≤ 9d3 ρ2
LD(Σ, Σ)
(3)
If this is true, Lemma A.3 gives
1
b + (µ − µ
b 2 ≤ 1 LD(Σ, Σ)
b)T Σ−1 (µ − µ
b) ≤ (9d3 ρ2 + ζ 2),
TV(N (µ, Σ), N (b
µ, Σ))
4
4
completing the proof. For showing (3), note that we have
b = LD(Ψ−1 ΣΨ−1 , Ψ−1ΣΨ
b −1 )
LD(Σ, Σ)
X
X
X
= LD(
Ψ−1 vi viT Ψ−1 ,
Ψ−1 vbi b
viT Ψ−1 ) = LD(I,
Ψ−1 b
vi vbiT Ψ−1 )
i
i
i
For the first equality we have used the fact that, if A and B are positive definite and
C is invertible, then LD(A, B) = LD(CAC, CBC). Indeed, as we proved in Lemma B.2,
LD(A, B) only depends on the spectrum of B −1 A. Observe that (v, λ) is an eigenvector/eigenvalue pair for B −1 A if and only if (C −1 v, λ) is an eigenvector/eigenvalue pair for
(CBC)−1 CAC; hence these two matrices have the same spectrum.
P
Let B := i Ψ−1 b
vi vbiT Ψ−1 . We shall show kB − Ik ≤ 3dρ, which implies −3dρI 4
b = LD(I, B) ≤ 9d3 ρ2 . We
B − I 4 3dρI and together with Lemma B.2 implies LD(Σ, Σ)
have
X
X
kB − Ik = k
(Ψ−1 b
vi b
viT Ψ−1 − Ψ−1 vi viT Ψ−1 )k ≤
kΨ−1 b
vi vbiT Ψ−1 − Ψ−1 vi viT Ψ−1 k
i
=
X
i
i
kxi xTi
−
yi yiT k,
vi and yi := Ψ−1 vi (here we have used the fact that Ψ−1 is symmetric). Note
with xi := Ψ−1 b
that kyi k = kΨ−1 vi k = 1, and that, by the lemma hypothesis, kxi − yi k ≤ ρ. Applying
Lemma D.1 below concludes the proof.
25
Lemma D.1. Suppose x, y satisfy kyk = 1 and kx − yk ≤ ε ≤ 1. Then we have kxxT −
yy Tk ≤ 3ε.
Proof. Suppose x = y + z with kzk ≤ ε. Then,
kxxT − yy Tk = kyz T + zy T + zz T k ≤ kyz T k + kzy T k + kzz T k ≤ ε + ε + ε2 ≤ 3ε.
D.4
Proof of Remark 4.4
Recall that N (µ, σ 2) denotes a 1-dimensional Gaussian distribution with mean µ and
standard deviation σ. We will need a lemma bounding the L1 distance of two Gaussians
in terms of their parameters.
Any vector (p1 , . . . , pn ) ∈ ∆n induces a discrete probability distribution over [n] defined
by Pr(i) := pi . Let x ∨ y := max{x, y}.
Lemma D.2. Let (p1 , . . . , p2n+1 ) ∈ ∆2n+1 and (q1 , . . . , q2n+1 ) ∈ ∆2n+1 be discrete probability distributions with ℓ1 distance between them ≤ t. Suppose we have 2n + 1 bins,
numbered 1 to 2n + 1. We throw m balls into these bins, where each ball chooses a bin
independently according to qi . We pair bin 1 with bin 2, bin 3 with bin 4, . . . , and bin
2n − 1 with bin 2n; so bin 2n + 1 is unpaired. The probability that, for all pairs of bins,
at most one them gets a ball, is not more than
!m
n
X
max{p2i−1 , p2i }
2n t/2 + p2n+1 +
i=1
Proof. Let P1 = {1, 2}, P2 = {3, 4}, ..., Pn = {2n − 1, 2n}, and let A := {A ⊂ [2n] :
|A ∩ Pi | = 1 ∀i ∈ [n]}. Clearly |A| = 2n . For any A ∈ A, let EA be the event that, the
first ball does not choose a bin in A, and let FA be the event that, none of the balls choose
a bin in A. Then,
X
X
X
Pr[EA ] =
qi ≤ TV(p, q) +
pi ≤ t/2 +
pi
i∈[2n+1]\A
≤ t/2 + p2n+1 +
i∈[2n+1]\A
n
X
i=1
i∈A
/
max{p2i−1 , p2i },
P
and so Pr[FA ] = Pr[EA ]m ≤ (t/2 + p2n+1 + ni=1 (p2i−1 ∨ p2i ))m . Finally, observe that, if
for each pair of bins, at most one them gets a ball, then there exists at least one A ∈ A,
such that none of the balls chooses a bin in A. The lemma is thus proved by applying the
union bound over all events {FA }A∈A .
26
Theorem D.3. The class of all Gaussian distributions over the real line admits (4, 1, O(1/ε))
0.773-robust compression.
Proof. Let q be any distribution (not necessarily a Gaussian) such that there exists a
Gaussian g = N (µ, σ 2) with kq − gk1 ≤ r ≤ 0.773. Our goal is to encode g using samples
generated from q. Let m = C/ε for a large enough constant C to be determined, and let
S ∼ q m be an i.i.d. sample. The goal is to approximately encode µ and σ using only four
elements of S and a single bit.
We start by defining the decoder J . Our proposed decoder takes as input four points
x1 , x2 , y1 , y2 ∈ R, and one bit b ∈ {0, 1}. The decoder then outputs a Gaussian distribution
based on the following rule:
x +x |y −y |2
N ( 1 2 2 , 1 9 2 ) : if b = 1
J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2 , b) =
N ( x1 +x2 , |y − y |2 ) : if b = 0
1
2
2
Our goal is thus to show that, with probability at least 2/3, there exists x1 , x2 , y1, y2 ∈ S
and b ∈ {0, 1} such that kJ (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2, b) − gk1 ≤ ε.
Let M = 1/ε and partition the interval [µ − 2σ, µ + 2σ) into 4M subintervals of length
εσ. Enumerate these intervals as I1 to I4M , i.e., Ii = [µ − 2σ + (i − 1)(εσ), µ − 2σ + i(εσ)).
S
Also let I4M +1 = R \ 4M
i=1 Ii . We state two claims which will imply the theorem, and will
be proved later.
Claim 1. With probability at least 5/6, there exist y1 , y2 ∈ S such that at least
one of the following two conditions holds: (a) y1 ∈ Ii and y2 ∈ Ii+M for some i ∈
{M + 1, 2M + 2, ..., 2M}. In this case, we let b = 0, and so J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2 , b) will have
standard deviation |y1 − y2 |.
(b) y1 ∈ Ii and y2 ∈ Ii+3M for some i ∈ [M]. In this case, we let b = 1, and so
2|
J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2 , b) will have standard deviation |y1 −y
.
3
Also, if both of (a) and (b) happen, we will go with the first rule. Note that if Claim 1
holds, and σ̂ is the standard deviation of J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2, b), then we will have |σ̂−σ| ≤ εσ.
Claim 2. With probability at least 5/6, there exist x1 , x2 ∈ S such that x1 ∈ Ii and
2
=: µ̂.
x2 ∈ I4M −i+1 for some i ∈ [2M]. If so, J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2, b) will have mean x1 +x
2
Also note that if Claim 2 holds, then |µ̂ − µ| ≤ εσ. Therefore, if both claims hold,
Lemma A.4 gives that J (x1 , x2 , y1 , y2, b) = N (µ̂, σ̂ 2 ) is a 2ε-approximation for N (µ, σ 2) =
g. In other words, g can be approximately reconstructed, up to error 2ε, using only four
data points (i.e., {x1 , x2 , y1 , y2}) from a sample S of size O(1/ε) and a single bit b (the
definition of robust compression requires error ≤ ε. For getting this, one just needs to
refine the partition by a constant factor, which multiplies M by a constant factor, and
as we will see below, this will only multiply m by a constant factor). Note also that the
27
probability of existence of such four points is at least 1 − (1 − 5/6) − (1 − 5/6) ≥ 2/3.
Therefore, it remains to prove Claim 1 and Claim 2.
We start with Claim 1. View the sets I1 , . . . , I4M , I4M +1 as bins, and consider the
R
i.i.d. samples as balls landing in these bins according to q. Let pi := Ii g(x)dx and
R
qi := Ii q(x)dx for i ∈ [4M + 1]. Note that, by triangle’s inequality, the ℓ1 distance
between (p1 , . . . , p4M +1 ) and (q1 , . . . , q4M +1 ) is not more than the L1 distance between g
and q, which is at most r.
We pair the bins as follows: Ii is paired with Ii+M for i ∈ {M + 1, . . . , 2M}, and Ii is
paired with Ii+3M for i ∈ [M]. Therefore, by Lemma D.2, the probability that Claim 1
does not hold can be bounded by
!m
M
2M
X
X
r
22M
(pi ∨pi+M )+ (pi ∨pi+3M )+p4M +1 +
2
i=1
i=M +1
m
5
7
M
M
M
2
2
X
X
X
r
pi+
= 22M
pi+p4M +1 + ,
pi+
2
3
M
3M +1
i= 2 M +1
i=
2
+1
where we have used the fact that pi are coming from a Gaussian, and thus p1 ≤ · · · ≤
p2M = p2M +1 ≥ · · · ≥ p4M (we have also assumed, for simplicity, that M is even). Let
X ∼ N (µ, σ 2) and Φ(A) := Pr[N(0, 1) ∈ A]. Then using known numerical bounds for Φ,
we obtain
2.5M
X
pi +
i=1.5M +1
M
X
i=M/2+1
pi +
3.5M
X
pi + p4M +1 + r/2
3M +1
= Pr[X ∈ [µ − σ/2, µ + σ/2]] + 2Pr[X ∈ [µ − 3σ/2, µ − σ]] + Pr[X ∈
/ [µ − 2σ, µ + 2σ]] + r/2
r
r
= Φ([−0.5, 0.5])+2Φ([−1.5, −1])+2Φ((−∞, −2])+ < 0.383 + 0.184 + 0.046 +
2
2
= 0.613 + r/2 ≤ 0.9995.
Therefore since M = Θ(1/ε), by making m = C/ε for a large enough C, we can make
this probability arbitrarily small, completing the proof of Claim 1.
Via a similar argument, the probability that Claim 2 does not hold can be bounded
by
22M
=2
2M
X
i=1
2M
max{pi , p4M −i+1 } + p4M +1 + r/2
!m
= 22M
2M
X
i=1
pi + p4M +1 + r/2
!m
(Φ([−1, 1]) + Φ([2, ∞) + r/2)m < 22M (0.5 + 0.023 + r/2)m < 22M (0.91)m < 1/6,
for m = C/ε with a large enough C.
28
Remark D.4. By using more bits and adding more scales, one can show that 1-dimensional
Gaussians admit (4, b(r), O(1/ε)) r-robust compression for any fixed r < 1 (the number
of required bits and the implicit constant in the O will depend on the value of r).
E
E.1
Omitted proofs from Section 5
Proof of Lemma 5.1
The proof of the following lemma, which is called the ‘generalized Fano’s inequality,’ uses
Fano’s inequality in information theory (Cover and Thomas, 2006, Theorem 2.10.1). It
was first proved in (Devroye, 1987, page 77). We write here a slightly stronger version,
which appears in (Yu, 1997, Lemma 3).
Lemma E.1 (generalized Fano’s inequality). Suppose we have M > 1 distributions
f1 , . . . , fM with
KL(fi k fj ) ≤ β and kfi − fj k1 > α
∀i 6= j ∈ [M].
Consider any density estimation method that gets n i.i.d. samples from some fi , and
outputs an estimate fb (the method does not know i). For each i, define ei as follows:
assume the method receives samples from fi , and outputs fb. Then ei := Ekfi − fbk1 .
Then, we have
max ei ≥ α(log M − nβ + log 2)/(2 log M) .
i
To prove Lemma 5.1, consider a distribution learning method for learning F with
sample complexity m(ε), and consider M distributions f1 , . . . , fM satisfying the hypotheses. Suppose we are in the setup of generalized Fano’s inequality: we get samples from
some unknown j ∈ [M], and we are to find which fj are the samples coming from. When
m(ε) samples are given to the method, with probability ≥ 2/3 it outputs some g within
distance ε to fj . Suppose we repeat this procedure for k times, and the method outputs
k distributions. If more than half of the times the method’s output was ε-close to some
fi , then we output that fi as the answer; otherwise we output f1 . Our error would be
0 with probability Pr [Bin(k, 2/3) > k/2], and at most 2 with the remaining probability.
Thus, the expected error can be upper bounded by exp(−Ω(k)) by the Chernoff bound.
Thus, generalized Fano’s inequality gives
α(log M − (km(ε))κ(ε) + log 2)/(2 log M) ≤ exp(−Ω(k)).
Choosing k = Θ(log(1/ε)) and rearranging gives m(ε) = Ω(log M/κ(ε) log(1/ε)), as required.
29
E.2
Proof of Lemma 5.3
We use the probabilistic method. We let the d/r columns of each Ua to be the first d/r
columns of a uniformly random orthonormal basis of Rd . To complete the proof, we need
2
only show that for two such random matrices Ua and Ub , with probability 1 − 2−Ω(d /r)
d
.
we have kUaT Ub k2F ≤ 2r
d
In the following, U = V means U and V have the same distribution. By rotation
d
invariance, we may assume Ua = [e1 , . . . , ed/r ], so that kUaT Ub k2F = kUd/r k2F , where Ud/r
is the d/r × d/r principal submatrix of a uniformly random orthogonal matrix U (alternatively, the columns of Ud/r are the first d/r coordinates of d/r orthonormal vectors in
Rd chosen uniformly at random). Hence, it suffices to show that kUd/r k2F ≤ d/(2r) with
2
probability at least 1 − 2−Ω(d /r) . We will do this indirectly by relating Ud/r to a matrix
with independent Gaussian entries.
To that end, let G be a d × d/r matrix with i.i.d. N (0, 1/d) entries. Let G = UG ΣG VGT
be its SVD, where UG ∈ Rd×d/r and ΣG , VG ∈ Rd/r×d/r . Observe that, by rotation invariance of the Gaussian matrix G, the columns of UG are d/r uniformly random orthonormal
vectors and hence, the top d/r rows of UG have the same distribution as Ud/r . Moreover,
by rotation invariance again, ΣG is independent of UG .
Now let Gd/r be the first d/r rows of G. Then,
d
kGd/r k = (UG )d/r ΣG VG = Ud/r ΣG VG ,
and, taking Frobenius norms of both sides,
d
kGd/r kF = kUd/r ΣG VG kF = kUd/r ΣG kF ≥ σmin (ΣG )kUd/r kF ,
(4)
with σmin (ΣG ) being the smallest singular value of ΣG . Since kGd/r k2F is a sum of i.i.d.
√
random variables and concentrates sharply around its mean, and Eσmin (ΣG ) ≥ 1 − 1/ r
by Gordon’s Theorem (Theorem A.12), this allows us to control kUd/r kF . In particular, for
any p ≥ 1, we can bound a suitably translated moment of kUd/r kF . Let (x)+ := max{0, x}.
Then, from (4) we get
√
√
EG (kGd/r kF − d/r)p+ ≥ EUd/r ,ΣG (σmin (ΣG )kUd/r kF − d/r)p+
√
= EUd/r EΣG (σmin (ΣG )kUd/r kF − d/r)p+
√
≥ EUd/r (EΣG σmin (ΣG )kUd/r kF − d/r)p+
√
√
≥ EUd/r ((1 − 1/ r)kUd/r kF − d/r)p+ ,
where the second inequality is Jensen’s inequality
√ inequality is Gordon’s
√ and the third
Theorem. Lemma A.6 gives that (kG
√d/r kF − d/r) is O(1/ d)-subgaussian, and since
√
the moments of (1 − 1/ r)kUd/r kF − d/r)+ are bounded by the moments of this random
30
variable, by
equivalence of having moment
bounds and being subgaussian (Lemma A.9),
p
√
√
we find that (1 − 1/r)kUd/r kF − d/r is also O(1/ d)-subgaussian. Hence, for any
+
t > 0, we have
h
i
p
√
2
Pr (1 − 1/r)kUd/r kF − d/r ≤ t ≥ 1 − 2−Ω(t d) .
√
√
Choosing t = d/(12 r) and the assumption that r ≥ 9 gives kUd/r k2F ≤ d/(2r) with
2
probability at least 1 − 2−Ω(d /r) , completing the proof.
E.3
Proof of Lemma 5.4
Assume that
kUaT Ub k2F
≤ d/(2r). Our goal is to show that TV(fa , fb ) = Ω
√
λ d/r
√
.
log(r/λ d)
√
Recall that fa = N (0, Σa ) with Σa = Id + λUa UaT . Let g ∼ N (0, Id). Then Σa g ∼ fa .
√
√
Thus our goal is to lower bound TV( Σa g, Σb g). Since total variation distance never
increases under a mapping (Fact A.5), we need only show that
!
√
p
p
d/r
λ
√
.
TV(Ua UaT Σa g, Ua UaT Σb g) = Ω
log(r/λ d)
√
P
Now let C := Ua UaT Σb and since C is symmetric, its SVD has form C = i∈[d/r] σi wi wiT
for orthonormal {wi } (some σi may be zero). Let S denote the column space of Ua ; so
w1 , . . . , wd/r ∈ S, and we may assume w1 , . . . , wd/r is an orthonormal basis for S. This
√
d P
means Ua UaT Σb g = i∈[d/r] σi gi wi , where the gi are the components of g. Note that
X
σi2 = kCk2F = Tr(CC T ) = Tr(Ua UaT (1 + λUb UbT )Ua UaT )
i∈[d/r]
= Tr(Ua UaT ) + λ Tr(Ua UaT Ub UbT Ua UaT ) =
=
d
+ λ Tr(UaT Ua UaT Ub UbT Ua )
r
d
d
+ λkUaT Ub k2F ≤ (1 + λ/2).
r
r
√
On the other hand, suppose u1 , . . . , ud/r are the columns of Ua . Then, (Ua UaT Σa )2 =
√
√
P
d √
(1+λ)Ua UaT and hence, Ua UaT Σa g = 1 + λ i∈[d/r] gi ui . That is, Ua UaT Σa g is a spher√
P
d
ical Gaussian in the subspace S. So, by its rotation invariance, we have 1 + λ i∈[d/r] gi ui =
√
P
1 + λ i∈[d/r] gi wi . Hence our goal is to show
√
TV( 1 + λ
d/r
X
gi wi ,
i=1
provided
P
i∈[d/r]
d/r
X
σi gi wi ) = Ω
i=1
σi2 ≤ d(1 + λ/2)/r.
31
√
λ d/r
√
log(r/λ d)
!
,
2
By reordering the wi , we may assume σ12 ≤ · · · ≤ σd/r
. At most half of the σi2 can be
2
twice their average, which means σ12 ≤ · · · ≤ σd/2r
≤ 2(1 + λ/2) ≤ 3. Now we may project
the two random vectors onto the subspace generated by the d/(2r) smallest eigenvectors,
and this can only decrease
√ the total variation distance. Taking the norms of the projected
vectors and dividing by d can only decrease the total variation distance; hence our new
goal is to show
!
√
d/2r
d/2r
X
λ d/r
gi 2 X 2 gi2
√
√ ,
,
(5)
σi √ ) = Ω
TV((1 + λ)
d
d
log(r/λ
d)
i=1
i=1
provided
P
i∈[d/2r]
σi2 ≤ d(1 + λ/2)/2r and maxi σi ≤ 3.
Observe that
d/2r
d/2r
2
2
X
X
√
√
√
gi
g
√ −E
E (1 + λ)
σi2 √i ≥ (1 + λ)( d/2r) − d(1 + λ/2)/2r = λ d/(4r).
d
d
i=1
i=1
Moreover, by Bernstein’s inequality (Lemma A.11), there exists a global constant c > 0
(independent of λ) such that for any t > 0,
d/(2r)
d/(2r)
X g2
X g2
√
i
i
2
√ − E(1 + λ)
√ > t ≤ 2 exp −c min{t , t d} ,
Pr (1 + λ)
d
d
i=1
i=1
and, since σi2 ≤ 3 for all i,
d/2r
d/2r
2
2
X
X
√
g
g
Pr
σi2 √i − E
σi2 √i > t ≤ 2 exp −c min{t2 , t d} .
d
d
i=1
i=1
√
Applying Lemma E.2 gives (5) (note that ζ ≤ O(log(r/λ d)) in the lemma), as required.
Lemma E.2. Let X, Y be continuous random variables such that |EX − EY | ≥ ∆.
Suppose also there exist c, C, β such that for any t > 0 we have
max{Pr [|X − EX| ≥ t] , Pr [|Y − EY | ≥ t]} ≤ C exp(−c min{t2 , βt}).
Let
ζ := max{1, ∆, log(4C)/cβ,
Then, TV(X, Y ) ≥ ∆/8ζ.
p
p
log(4C)/c, log(8C/cβ∆)/cβ, log(4C/c∆)/c}.
32
Proof. We shall show that, for any h > 0 we have
TV(X, Y ) ≥
∆ − C exp(−c min(h2 , βh))∆ − C exp(−ch2 )/ch − 2C exp(−cβh)/cβ
, (6)
h+∆
and the lemma will follow by choosing h = ζ.
Without loss of generality, we may assume EY ≥ EX and by translating, we may
assume EX = −∆/2 and EY = ∆/2. Let I = [EX − h, EY + h], I ′ = R \ I and let
f (x), g(x) denote the densities of X and Y .
Define random variable Z to be |X − EX| if |X − EX| > h, and 0 otherwise. Then,
since I ′ ⊆ (−∞, EX − h) ∪ (EX + h, ∞), we have
Z
EZ =
|(x − EX)f (x)|dx
(−∞,EX−h)∪(EX+h,∞)
Z
≥ (|x|f (x) − |EX|f (x))dx
′
ZI
=
|xf (x)|dx − (∆/2)Pr [|X − EX| > h]
′
ZI
|xf (x)|dx − C exp(−c min(h2 , βh))∆/2
≥
I′
On the other hand,
Z ∞
Z ∞
EZ =
Pr [Z > t] dt =
Pr [|X − EX| > t] dt
0
h
Z ∞
Z ∞
Z
2
2
≤
C exp(−c min{t , βt})dt ≤
C exp(−ct )dt +
h
h
∞
C exp(−cβt)dt
h
≤ C exp(−ch2 )/2ch + C exp(−cβh)/cβ,
where for the last inequality we have used tail bounds for the standard normal distribution
(see Abramowitz and Stegun, 1984, formula (7.1.13)). Thus we find
Z
|xf (x)|dx ≤ C exp(−ch2 )/2ch + C exp(−cβh)/cβ + C exp(−c min(h2 , βh))∆/2.
I′
A similar calculation gives the same upper bound for
Z
Z
∆ = x(g(x) − f (x))dx +
x(g(x) − f (x))dx
′
I
I
Z
Z
≤ |x||g(x) − f (x)|dx +
|x|(|g(x)| + |f (x)|)dx
I
R
I′
|xg(x)|dx. Finally, observe that
I′
≤ kf (x) − g(x)k1 (h + ∆)/2 + C exp(−ch2 )/ch + 2C exp(−cβh)/cβ + C exp(−c min(h2 , βh))∆,
since |x| ≤ (h + ∆)/2 for all x ∈ I. Re-arranging and noting total variation distance is
half the L1 distance gives (6).
33
E.4
Proof of Theorem 5.5
We begin with a combinatorial lemma. Let dH (·, ·) denote the Hamming distance between
two tuples.
Lemma E.3. Let T ≥ 2 and k ∈ N. There exists a set of tuples X ⊆ [T ]k such that
|X | ≥ 2Ω(k log(T )) and dH (x, y) ≥ k/4 for any pair of distinct x, y ∈ X .
Proof. Let x and y be strings of length k where each coordinate is drawn from [T ] independently and uniformly at random. Let Xi be the indicator random variable which is
P
1 if xi = yi . Then k − dH (x, y) = ki=1 Xi and E[k − dH (x, y)] =p
k/T ≤ k/2. Observe
that Xi = 1 with probability 1/T and 0 otherwise; hence it is 1/ log(T )-subgaussian.
By Hoeffding’s Inequality (Lemma A.10),
" k
#
X
Pr
Xi ≥ 3k/4 ≤ 2 · exp(−ck log(T ))
i=1
for some absolute constant c > 0. Thus, we conclude that there is some set X with
|X | ≥ 2Ω(k log(T )) and dH (x, y) ≥ k/4 for any pair of distinct x, y ∈ X .
We now prove Theorem 5.5, using Lemma 5.1 again. The proof of Theorem 5.2
2
promises a collection of T = 2Ω(d ) matrices Σ1 , . . . , ΣT ≺ 2Id with KL(N (0, Σi k N (0, Σi′ )) ≤
O(ε2 log2 (1/ε)) and TV(N (0, Σi ), N (0, Σi′ )) ≥ Ω(ε) for i 6= i′ . Choose µ1 , . . . , µk ∈ Rd
such that kµi − µi′ k2 ≥ C(kd/ε)10 for all i 6= i′ , where C is a large enough constant.
2
By Lemma E.3, there exists a set X ⊆ [T ]k of size 2Ω(k log(T )) = 2Ω(kd ) such that
dH (x, y) ≥ k/4 for any distinct x, y ∈ X . We now define a set of mixture distributions as
1
F = fx := (N (µ1, Σx1 ) + . . . + N (µk , Σxk )) : x ∈ X .
k
We shall show that for any x 6= y, we have KL(fx k fy ) ≤ O(ε2 log2 (1/ε)) and TV(fx , fy ) ≥
Ω(ε). Lemma 5.1 will then conclude the proof.
The proof of upper bound for KL divergence simply follows from convexity of KLdivergence (see Cover and Thomas, 2006, Theorem 2.7.2). and the fact that, for each
i,
KL(N (µi , Σxi k N (µi , Σyi )) = KL(N (0, Σxi k N (0, Σyi )) ≤ O(ε2 log2 (1/ε)).
Next we show that TV(fx , fy ) ≥ Ω(ε). Let
o
n
′
Aj ∈ argmax Prg∼N (µj ,Σxj ) [g ∈ A] − Prg∼N (µj ,Σyj ) [g ∈ A] .
A⊆Rd
Since Σi ≺ 2Id for all i, we have
Prg∼N (µj ,Σxj ) [kg − µj k22 ≥ 2d + O(d log(k/ε))] ≤ ε2 /k 2 ,
34
p
and a similar bound holds for N (µj , Σyj ). Now define Aj = A′j ∩ B2d (µj , O( d log(k/ε))),
where B2d (µ, r) denotes the ℓ2 ball centered at µ with radius r. Then,
Prg∼N (µj ,Σxj ) [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼N (µj ,Σyj ) [g ∈ Aj ] ≥ TV(N (µj , Σxj ), N (µj , Σyj )) − ε2 /k 2 .
Note that the separation of µ1 , . . . , µk implies that A1 , . . . , Ak are disjoint sets and
Prg∼N (µi ,Σyi ) [g ∈ Aj ] ≤ ε2 /k 2 for i 6= j. Let A = ∪j Aj . Finally, to lower bound the total
variation distance, we have
TV(fx , fy ) ≥ Prg∼fx [g ∈ A] − Prg∼fy [g ∈ A]
=
k
X
j=1
Prg∼fx [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼fy [g ∈ Aj ]
k
k
1 XX
Prg∼N (µi ,Σxi ) [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼N (µi ,Σyi ) [g ∈ Aj ]
=
k j=1 i=1
k
i
1 Xh
=
Prg∼N (µj ,Σxj ) [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼N (µj ,Σyj ) [g ∈ Aj ]
k j=1
k
1 XX
Prg∼N (µi ,Σxi ) [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼N (µi ,Σyi ) [g ∈ Aj ]
+
k j=1 i6=j
i
1 Xh
≥
Prg∼N (µj ,Σxj ) [g ∈ Aj ] − Prg∼N (µj ,Σyj ) [g ∈ Aj ] − ε2
k j=1
k
k
≥
1 X
TV(N (µj , Σxj ), N (µj , Σyj )) − ε2 /k 2 − ε2
k j=1
1
(k/4)Ω(ε) − 2ε2 ≥ Ω(ε),
k
where the last inequality is because TV(N (µj , Σxj ), N (µj , Σyj )) ≥ Ω(ε) whenever xj 6= yj
which is the case for at least k/4 of the indices j.
≥
References
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley
& Sons, Inc., New York; National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1984. ISBN
0-471-80007-4. Reprint of the 1972 edition, Selected Government Publications,available
at http://people.math.sfu.ca/~ cbm/aands/.
M. Anthony and P. Bartlett. Neural network learning: theoretical foundations. Cambridge
University Press, 1999.
35
H. Ashtiani, S. Ben-David, and A. Mehrabian. Sample-efficient learning of mixtures. arXiv
preprint arXiv:1706.01596, 2017. Accepted for presentation in the AAAI Conference
on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’18).
A. Blumer, A. Ehrenfeucht, D. Haussler, and M. K. Warmuth. Learnability and the
Vapnik-Chervonenkis dimension. J. ACM, 36(4):929–965, Oct. 1989. ISSN 0004-5411.
doi: 10.1145/76359.76371. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/76359.76371.
S.-O. Chan, I. Diakonikolas, R. A. Servedio, and X. Sun. Efficient density estimation via
piecewise polynomial approximation. In Proceedings of the Forty-sixth Annual ACM
Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’14, pages 604–613, New York, NY, USA,
2014. ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-2710-7. doi: 10.1145/2591796.2591848.
T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas. Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience
[John Wiley & Sons], Hoboken, NJ, second edition, 2006. ISBN 978-0-471-24195-9;
0-471-24195-4.
L. Devroye. A course in density estimation, volume 14 of Progress in Probability and
Statistics. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1987. ISBN 0-8176-3365-0.
L. Devroye and G. Lugosi. Combinatorial methods in density estimation. Springer Series
in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001. ISBN 0-387-95117-2. doi: 10.1007/
978-1-4613-0125-7.
I. Diakonikolas.
Learning Structured Distributions.
In Peter Bühlmann, Petros Drineas, Michael Kane, and Mark van der Laan, editors, Handbook of
Big Data, chapter 15, pages 267–283. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2016.
URL
http://www.crcnetbase.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1201/b19567-21.
I. Diakonikolas, D. M. Kane, and A. Stewart. Statistical query lower bounds for robust
estimation of high-dimensional Gaussians and Gaussian mixtures. In 2017 IEEE 58th
Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 73–84, Oct
2017a. doi: 10.1109/FOCS.2017.16. Available on arXiv:1611.03473 [cs.LG].
I. Diakonikolas, D. M. Kane, and A. Stewart. Learning multivariate log-concave
distributions.
In Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, volume 65 of
COLT’17, pages 1–17, 2017b.
ISBN 3-540-35294-5, 978-3-540-35294-5.
URL
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v65/diakonikolas17a/diakonikolas17a.pdf.
A. Kalai, A. Moitra, and G. Valiant. Disentangling Gaussians. Communications of the
ACM, 55(2), 2012.
36
M. Kearns, Y. Mansour, D. Ron, R. Rubinfeld, R. E. Schapire, and L. Sellie. On
the learnability of discrete distributions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual
ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’94, pages 273–282, New York,
NY, USA, 1994. ACM. ISBN 0-89791-663-8. doi: 10.1145/195058.195155. URL
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/195058.195155.
K. A. Lai, A. B. Rao, and S. Vempala. Agnostic estimation of mean and covariance. In
57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2016.
B. Laurent and P. Massart. Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model
selection. The Annals of Statistics, 28(5), 2000.
N. Littlestone and M. Warmuth. Relating data compression and learnability. Technical
report, Technical report, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1986.
A. E. Litvak, A. Pajor, M. Rudelson, and N. Tomczak-Jaegermann. Smallest singular
value of random matrices and geometry of random polytopes. Adv. Math., 195(2):491–
523, 2005. ISSN 0001-8708. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2004.08.004.
M. Lucic, M. Faulkner, A. Krause, and D. Feldman. Training mixture models at scale via
coresets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08110, 2017.
S. Moran and A. Yehudayoff. Sample compression schemes for vc classes. Journal of the
ACM (JACM), 63(3):21, 2016.
C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT
Press, 2006.
R.-D. Reiss. Approximate distributions of order statistics with applications to nonparametric statistics. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. ISBN
0-387-96851-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9620-8.
A. T. Suresh, A. Orlitsky, J. Acharya, and A. Jafarpour. Near-optimal-sample estimators for spherical gaussian mixtures. In Z. Ghahramani, M. Welling, C. Cortes,
N. D. Lawrence, and K. Q. Weinberger, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 27, pages 1395–1403. Curran Associates, Inc., 2014. URL
http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5251-near-optimal-sample-estimators-for-spherical-gaussian
A. B. Tsybakov. Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation. Springer, 2009.
V. N. Vapnik and A. Y. Chervonenkis. On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies
of events to their probabilities. Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 16(2):264–280,
1971. doi: 10.1137/1116025.
37
R. Vershynin. Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices, pages
210–268. Cambridge University Press, 2012. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511794308.006.
R.
Vershynin.
High-Dimensional
Probability.
Cambridge
University
Press,
2018.
To
appear,
available
at
https://www.math.uci.edu/~ rvershyn/papers/HDP-book/HDP-book.pdf.
B. Yu. Assouad, Fano, and Le Cam. In Festschrift for Lucien Le Cam, pages 423–435.
Springer, New York, 1997.
38
| 10math.ST
|
Quadratic and Near-Quadratic Lower Bounds
for the CONGEST Model∗
Keren Censor-Hillel
Seri Khoury
Ami Paz
May 17, 2017
arXiv:1705.05646v1 [cs.DC] 16 May 2017
Abstract
We present the first super-linear lower bounds for natural graph problems in the CONGEST model, answering a long-standing open question.
Specifically, we show that any exact computation of a minimum vertex cover or a maximum independent set requires Ω(n2 / log2 n) rounds in the worst case in the CONGEST
model, as well as any algorithm for χ-coloring a graph, where χ is the chromatic number
of the graph. We further show that such strong lower bounds are not limited to NP-hard
problems, by showing two simple graph problems in P which require a quadratic and nearquadratic number of rounds.
Finally, we address the problem of computing an exact solution to weighted all-pairsshortest-paths (APSP), which arguably may be considered as a candidate for having a
super-linear lower bound. We show a simple Ω(n) lower bound for this problem, which
implies a separation between the weighted and unweighted cases, since the latter is known
to have a complexity of Θ(n/ log n). We also formally prove that the standard Alice-Bob
framework is incapable of providing a super-linear lower bound for exact weighted APSP,
whose complexity remains an intriguing open question.
∗
Department of Computer Science, Technion, {ckeren,serikhoury,amipaz}@cs.technion.ac.il. Supported in
part by ISF grant 1696/14.
1
1
Introduction
It is well-known and easily proven that many graph problems are global for distributed computing, in the sense that solving them necessitates communication throughout the network. This
implies tight Θ(D) complexities, where D is the diameter of the network, for global problems in
the LOCAL model. In this model, a message of unbounded size can be sent over each edge in
each round, which allows to learn the entire topology in D rounds. Global problems are widely
studied in the CONGEST model, in which the size of each message is restricted to O(log n)
bits, where n is the size of the network. The trivial complexity of learning the entire topology
in the CONGEST model is O(m), where m is the number of edges of the communication graph,
and since m can be as large as Θ(n2 ), one of the most basic questions for a global problem is
how fast in terms of n it can be solved in the CONGEST model.
Some global problems admit fast O(D)-round solutions in the CONGEST model, such as
√
constructing a breadth-first search tree [59]. Some others have complexities of Θ̃(D + n),
such as constructing a minimum spanning tree, and various approximation and verification
problems [32, 39, 45, 60, 61, 64]. Some problems are yet harder, with complexities that are nearlinear in n [1, 32, 41, 51, 60]. For some problems, no O(n) solutions are known and they are
candidates to being even harder that the ones with linear-in-n complexities.
A major open question about global graph problems in the CONGEST model is whether
natural graph problems for which a super-linear number of rounds is required indeed exist. In
this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. That is, our conceptual contribution is
that there exist super-linearly hard problems in the CONGEST model. In fact, the
lower bounds that we prove in this paper are as high as quadratic in n, or quadratic up to
logarithmic factors, and hold even for networks of a constant diameter. Our lower bounds also
imply linear and near-linear lower bounds for the CLIQUE-BROADCAST model.
We note that high lower bounds for the CONGEST model may be obtained rather artificially,
by forcing large inputs and outputs that must be exchanged. However, we emphasize that all
the problems for which we show our lower bounds can be reduced to simple decision problems,
where each node needs to output a single bit. All inputs to the nodes, if any, consist of edge
weights that can be represented by polylogn bits.
Technically, we prove a lower bound of Ω(n2 / log2 n) on the number of rounds required for
computing an exact minimum vertex cover, which also extends to computing an exact maximum
independent set (Section 3.1). This is in stark contrast to the recent O(log ∆/ log log ∆)-round
algorithm of [8] for obtaining a (2 + )-approximation to the minimum vertex cover. Similarly,
we give an Ω(n2 / log2 n) lower bound for 3-coloring a 3-colorable graph, which extends also for
deciding whether a graph is 3-colorable, and also implies the same hardness for computing the
chromatic number χ or computing a χ-coloring (Section 3.2). These lower bounds hold even for
randomized algorithms which succeed with high probability.1
An immediate question that arises is whether only NP-hard problems are super-linearly
hard in the CONGEST model. In Section 4, we provide a negative answer to such a postulate,
by showing two simple problems that admit polynomial-time sequential algorithms, but in the
CONGEST model require Ω(n2 ) rounds (identical subgraph detection) or Ω(n2 / log n) rounds
(weighted cycle detection). The latter also holds for randomized algorithms, while for the
former we show a randomized algorithm that completes in O(D) rounds, providing the strongest
possible separation between deterministic and randomized complexities for global problems in
the CONGEST model.
Finally, we address the intriguing open question of the complexity of computing exact
weighted all-pairs-shortest-paths (APSP) in the CONGEST model. While the complexity of the
unweighted version of APSP is Θ(n/ log n), as follows from [32, 42], the complexity of weighted
1
We say that an event occurs with high probability (w.h.p) if it occurs with probability
c > 0.
1
1
,
nc
for some constant
APSP remains largely open, and only recently the first sub-quadratic algorithm was given in [28].
With the current state-of-the-art, this problem could be considered as a suspect for having a
super-linear complexity in the CONGEST model. While we do not pin-down the complexity of
weighted APSP in the CONGEST model, we provide a truly linear lower bound of Ω(n) rounds
for it, which separates its complexity from that of the unweighted case. Moreover, we argue
that it is not a coincidence that we are currently unable to show super-linear lower bound for
weighted APSP, by formally proving that the commonly used framework of reducing a 2-party
communication problem to a problem in the CONGEST model cannot provide a super-linear
lower bound for weighted APSP, regardless of the function and the graph construction used
(Section 5). This implies that obtaining any super-linear lower bound for weighted
APSP provably requires a new technique.
1.1
The Challenge
Many lower bounds for the CONGEST model rely on reductions from 2-party communication
problems (see, e.g., [1,17,25,27,32,41,56,57,61,64]). In this setting, two players, Alice and Bob,
are given inputs of K bits and need to a single output a bit according to some given function
of their inputs. One of the most common problem for reduction is Set Disjointness, in which
the players need to decide whether there is an index for which both inputs are 1. That is, if
the inputs represent subsets of {0, . . . , K − 1}, the output bit of the players needs to indicate
whether their input sets are disjoint. The communication complexity of 2-party Set Disjointness
is known to be Θ(K) [49].
In a nutshell, there are roughly two standard frameworks for reducing the 2-party communication problem of computing a function f to a problem P in the CONGEST model. One
of these frameworks works as follows. A graph construction is given, which consists of some
fixed edges and some edges whose existence depends on the inputs of Alice and Bob. This
graph should have the property that a solution to P over it determines the solution to f . Then,
given an algorithm ALG for solving P in the CONGEST model, the vertices of the graph are
split into two disjoint sets, VA and VB , and Alice simulates ALG over VA while Bob simulates
ALG over VB . The only communication required between Alice and Bob in order to carry
out this simulation is the content of messages sent in each direction over the edges of the cut
C = E(VA , VB ). Therefore, given a graph construction with a cut of size |C| and inputs of size
K for a function f whose communication complexity on K bits is at least CC(f ), the round
complexity of ALG is at least Ω(CC(f )/|C| log n).
The challenge in obtaining super-linear lower bounds was previously that the cuts in the
graph constructions were large compared with the input size K. For example, the graph construction for the lower bound for computing the diameter in [32] has K = Θ(n2 ) and |C| = Θ(n),
which gives an almost linear lower bound. The graph construction in [32] for the lower bound
√
for computing a (3/2 − )-approximation to the diameter has a smaller cut of |C| = Θ( n), but
this comes at the price of supporting a smaller input size K = Θ(n), which gives a lower bound
that is roughly a square-root of n.
To overcome this difficulty, we leverage the recent framework of [1], which provides a bitgadget whose power is in allowing a logarithmic-size cut. We manage to provide a graph
construction that supports inputs of size K = Θ(n2 ) in order to obtain our lower bounds for
minimum vertex cover, maximum independent set and 3-coloring2 . The latter is also inspired by,
and is a simplification of, a lower bound construction for the size of proof labelling schemes [33].
Further, for the problems in P that we address, the cut is as small as |C| = O(1). For one of
the problems, the size of the input is such that it allows us to obtain the highest possible lower
bound of Ω(n2 ) rounds.
2
It can also be shown, by simple modifications to our constructions, that these problems require Ω(m) rounds,
for graphs with m edges.
2
With respect to the complexity of the weighted APSP problem, we show an embarrassingly
simple graph construction that extends a construction of [56], which leads to an Ω(n) lower
bound. However, we argue that a new technique must be developed in order to obtain any superlinear lower bound for weighted APSP. Roughly speaking, this is because given a construction
with a set S of nodes that touch the cut, Alice and Bob can exchange O(|S|n log n) bits which
encode the weights of all lightest paths from any node in their set to a node in S. Since
the cut has Ω(|S|) edges, and the bandwidth is Θ(log n), this cannot give a lower bound of
more than Ω(n) rounds. With some additional work, our proof can be carried over to a larger
number of players at the price of a small logarithmic factor, as well as to the second Alice-Bob
framework used in previous work (e.g. [64]), in which Alice and Bob do not simulate nodes in
a fixed partition, but rather in decreasing sets that partially overlap. Thus, determining the
complexity of weighted APSP requires new tools, which we leave as a major open problem.
1.2
Additional Related Work
Vertex Coloring, Minimum Vertex Cover, and Maximum Independent Set: One of
the most central problems in graph theory is vertex coloring, which has been extensively studied
in the context of distributed computing (see, e.g., [9–14, 18, 20, 21, 29–31, 37, 53, 55, 62, 65] and
references therein). The special case of finding a (∆ + 1)-coloring, where ∆ is the maximum
degree of a node in the network, has been the focus of many of these studies, but is a local
problem, which can be solved in much less than a sublinear number of rounds.
Another classical problem in graph theory is finding a minimum vertex cover (MVC). In distributed computing, the time complexity of approximating MVC has been addressed in several
cornerstone studies [5, 6, 8, 14, 34–36, 44, 46–48, 58, 63].
Observe that finding a minimum size vertex cover is equivalent to finding a maximum size
independent set. However, these problems are not equivalent in an approximation-preserving
way. Distributed approximations for maximum independent set has been studied in [7,15,22,52].
Distance Computations: Distance computation problems have been widely studied in the
CONGEST model for both weighted and unweighted networks [1, 32, 38–42, 50, 51, 56, 60]. One
of the most fundamental problems of distance computations is computing all pairs shortest
paths. For unweighted networks, an upper bound of O(n/ log n) was recently shown by [42],
matching the lower bound of [32]. Moreover, the possibility of bypassing this near-linear barrier
for any constant approximation factor was ruled out by [56]. For the weighted case, however,
we are still very far from understanding the complexity of APSP, as there is still a huge gap
2
5
between the upper and lower bounds. Recently, Elkin [28] showed an O(n 3 · log 3 (n)) upper
bound for weighted APSP, while the previously highest lower bound was the near-linear lower
bound of [56] (which holds also for any (poly n)-approximation factor in the weighted case).
Distance computation problems have also been considered in the CONGESTED-CLIQUE
model [16, 38, 40], in which the underlying communication network forms a clique. In this
model [16] showed that unweighted APSP, and a (1 + o(1))-approximation for weighted APSP,
can be computed in O(n0.158 ) rounds.
Subgraph Detection: The problem of finding subgraphs of a certain topology has received a
lot of attention in both the sequential and the distributed settings (see, e.g., [2–4, 16, 23–25, 43,
54, 66] and references therein). The problems of finding paths of length 4 or 5 with zero weight
are also related to other fundamental problems, notable in our context is APSP [2].
3
2
2.1
Preliminaries
Communication Complexity
In a two-party communication complexity problem [49], there is a function f : {0, 1}K ×
{0, 1}K → {TRUE, FALSE}, and two players, Alice and Bob, who are given two input strings,
x, y ∈ {0, 1}K , respectively, that need to compute f (x, y). The communication complexity of
a protocol π for computing f , denoted CC(π), is the maximal number of bits Alice and Bob
exchange in π, taken over all values of the pair (x, y). The deterministic communication complexity of f , denoted CC(f ), is the minimum over CC(π), taken over all deterministic protocols
π that compute f .
In a randomized protocol π, Alice and Bob may each use a random bit string. A randomized
protocol π computes f if the probability, over all possible bit strings, that π outputs f (x, y) is
at least 2/3. The randomized communication complexity of f , CC R (f ), is the minimum over
CC(π), taken over all randomized protocols π that compute f .
In the Set Disjointness problem (DISJK ), the function f is DISJK (x, y), whose output is
FALSE if there is an index i ∈ {0, . . . , K − 1} such that xi = yi = 1, and TRUE otherwise. In
the Equality problem (EQK ), the function f is EQK (x, y), whose output is TRUE if x = y, and
FALSE otherwise.
Both the deterministic and randomized communication complexities of the DISJK problem
are known to be Ω(K) [49, Example 3.22]. The deterministic communication complexity of
EQK is in Ω(K) [49, Example 1.21], while its randomized communication complexity is in
Θ(log K) [49, Example 3.9].
2.2
Lower Bound Graphs
To prove lower bounds on the number of rounds necessary in order to solve a distributed
problem in the CONGEST model, we use reductions from two-party communication complexity
problems. To formalize them we use the following definition.
Definition 1. (Family of Lower Bound Graphs)
Fix an integer K, a function f : {0, 1}K × {0, 1}K → {TRUE, FALSE} and a predicate P for
graphs. The family of graphs {Gx,y = (V, Ex,y ) | x, y ∈ {0, 1}K }, is said to be a family of lower
bound graphs w.r.t. f and P if the following properties hold:
˙ B a fixed
(1) The set of nodes V is the same for all graphs, and we denote by V = VA ∪V
partition of it;
(2) Only the existence or the weight of edges in VA × VA may depend on x;
(3) Only the existence or the weight of edges in VB × VB may depend on y;
(4) Gx,y satisfies the predicate P iff f (x, y) = TRUE.
We use the following theorem, which is standard in the context of communication complexitybased lower bounds for the CONGEST model (see, e.g. [1, 25, 32, 40]) Its proof is by a standard
simulation argument.
Theorem 1. Fix a function f : {0, 1}K ×{0, 1}K → {TRUE, FALSE} and a predicate P . If there is
a family {Gx,y } of lower bound graphs with C = E(VA , VB ) then any deterministic algorithm for
deciding P in the CONGEST model requires Ω(CC(f )/ |C| log n) rounds, and any randomized
algorithm for deciding P in the CONGEST model requires Ω(CC R (f )/ |C| log n) rounds.
Proof. Let ALG be a distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that decides P in T rounds.
Given inputs x, y ∈ {0, 1}K to Alice and Bob, respectively, Alice constructs the part of Gx,y
4
for the nodes in VA and Bob does so for the nodes in VB . This can be done by items (1),(2)
and (3) in Definition 1, and since {Gx,y } satisfies this definition. Alice and Bob simulate ALG
by exchanging the messages that are sent during the algorithm between nodes of VA and nodes
of VB in either direction. (The messages within each set of nodes are simulated locally by the
corresponding player without any communication). Since item (4) in Definition 1 also holds,
we have that Alice and Bob correctly output f (x, y) based on the output of ALG. For each
edge in the cut, Alice and Bob exchange O(log n) bits per round. Since there are T rounds
and |C| edges in the cut, the number of bits exchanged in this protocol for computing f is
O(T |C| log n). The lower bounds for T now follows directly from the lower bounds for CC(f )
and CC R (f ).
In what follows, for each decision problem addressed, we describe a fixed graph construction
G = (V, E), which we then generalize to a family of graphs {Gx,y = (V, Ex,y ) | x, y ∈ {0, 1}K },
which we show to be a family lower bound graphs w.r.t. to some function f and the required
predicate P . By Theorem 1 and the known lower bounds for the 2-party communication
problem, we deduce a lower bound for any algorithm for deciding P in the CONGEST model.
Remark: For our constructions which use the Set Disjointness function as f , we need to exclude
the possibilities of all-1 input vectors. This is for the sake of guaranteeing that the graphs are
connected, in order to avoid trivial impossibilities. However, this restriction does not change
the asymptotic bounds for Set Disjointness, since computing this function while excluding all-1
input vectors can be reduced to computing this function for inputs that are shorter by one bit
(by having the last bit be fixed to 0).
3
3.1
Near-Quadratic Lower Bounds for NP-Hard Problems
Minimum Vertex Cover
The first near-quadratic lower bound we present is for computing a minimum vertex cover, as
stated in the following theorem.
Theorem 2. Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model for computing a minimum vertex cover or for deciding whether there is a vertex cover of a given size M requires Ω(n2 / log2 n)
rounds.
Finding the minimum size of a vertex cover is equivalent to finding the maximum size of a
maximum independent set, because a set of nodes is a vertex cover if and only if its complement
is an independent set. Thus, Theorem 3 is a direct corollary of Theorem 2.
Theorem 3. Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model for computing a maximum
independent set or for deciding whether there is an independent set of a given size requires
Ω(n2 / log2 n) rounds.
Observe that a lower bound for deciding whether there is a vertex cover of some given
size M or not implies a lower bound for computing a minimum vertex cover. This is because
computing the size of a given subset of nodes can be easily done in O(D) rounds using standard
tools. Therefore, to prove Theorem 2 it is sufficient to prove its second part. We do so by
describing a family of lower bound graphs with respect to the Set Disjointness function and the
predicate P that says that the graph has a vertex cover of size M . We begin with describing
the fixed graph construction G = (V, E) and then define the family of lower bound graphs and
analyze its relevant properties.
The fixed graph construction: Let k be a power of 2. The fixed graph (Figure 1) consists
5
Figure 1: The family of lower bound graphs for deciding the size of a vertex cover, with many edges
omitted for clarity. The node ak−1
is connected to all the nodes in TA1 , and a12 is connected to t0A2 and
1
0
to all the nodes in FA2 \ {fA2 }. Examples of edges from b01 and b02 to the bit-gadgets are also given. An
additional edge, which is among the edges corresponding to the strings x and y, is {b01 , b12 }, while the
edge {a01 , a02 } does not exist. Here, x0,0 = 1 and y0,1 = 0.
of four cliques of size k: A1 = {ai1 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1}, A2 = {ai2 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1}, B1 = {bi1 | 0 ≤
i ≤ k − 1} and B2 = {bi2 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1}. In addition, for each set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 }, there
are two corresponding sets of nodes of size log k, denoted FS = {fSh | 0 ≤ h ≤ log k − 1} and
TS = {thS | 0 ≤ h ≤ log k − 1}. The latter are called bit-gadgets and their nodes are bit-nodes.
The bit-nodes are partitioned into 2 log k 4-cycles: for each h ∈ {0, . . . , log k − 1} and ` ∈
{1, 2}, we connect the 4-cycle (fAh` , thA` , fBh ` , thB` ). Note that there are no edges between pairs of
nodes denoted fSh , or between pairs of nodes denoted thS .
The nodes of each set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 } are connected to nodes in the corresponding
set of bit-nodes, according to their binary representation, as follows. Let si` be a node in a set
S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 }, i.e. s ∈ {a, b}, ` ∈ {1, 2} and i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, and let ihdenote the bit
number
h in the binary representation of i. For such a node si` define bin(si` ) = fSh | ih = 0 ∪
h
tS | ih = 1 , and connect si` by an edge to each of the nodes in bin(si` ). The next two claims
address the basic properties of vertex covers of G.
Claim 1. Any vertex cover of G must contain at least k − 1 nodes from each of the clique
A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 , and at least 4 log k bit-nodes.
Proof. In order to cover all the edges of each if the cliques on A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 , any vertex
cover must contain at least k − 1 nodes of the clique. For each h ∈ {0, . . . , log k − 1} and
` ∈ {1, 2}, in order to cover the edges of the 4-cycle (fAh` , thA` , fBh ` , thB` ), any vertex cover must
contain at least two of the cycle nodes.
Claim 2. If U ⊆ V is a vertex cover of G of size 4(k − 1) + 4 log k, then there are two indices
i, j ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} such that ai1 , aj2 , bi1 , bj2 are not in U .
Proof. By Claim 1, U must contain k − 1 nodes from each clique A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 , and 4 log k
0
0
bit-nodes, so it must not contain one node from each clique. Let ai1 , aj2 , bi1 , bj2 be the nodes in
A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 which are not in U , respectively. To cover the edges connecting ai1 to bin(ai1 ), U
0
must contain all the nodes of bin(ai1 ), and similarly, U must contain all the nodes of bin(bi1 ).
If i 6= i0 then there is an index h ∈ {0, . . . , log k − 1} such that ih 6= i0h , so one of the edges
6
(fAh1 , thB1 ) or (thA1 , fBh 1 ) is not covered by U . Thus, it must hold that i = i0 . A similar argument
shows j = j 0 .
Adding edges corresponding to the strings x and y: Given two binary strings x, y ∈
2
{0, 1}k , we augment the graph G defined above with additional edges, which defines Gx,y .
Assume that x and y are indexed by pairs of the form (i, j) ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}2 . For each such
pair (i, j) we add to Gx,y the following edges. If xi,j = 0, then we add an edge between the
nodes ai1 and aj2 , and if yi,j = 0 then we add an edge between the nodes bi1 and bj2 . To prove
that {Gxy } is a family of lower bound graphs, it remains to prove the next lemma.
Lemma 1. The graph Gx,y has a vertex cover of cardinality M = 4(k − 1) + 4 log k iff
DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
Proof. For the first implication, assume that DISJ(x, y) = FALSE and let i, j ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}
be such that xi,j = yi,j = 1. Note that in this case ai1 is not connected to aj2 , and bi1 is not
connected to bj2 . We define a set U ⊆ V as the union of the two sets of nodes (A1 \ {ai1 }) ∪ (A2 \
{aj2 }) ∪ (B1 \ {bi1 }) ∪ (B2 \ {bj2 }) and bin(ai1 ) ∪ bin(aj2 ) ∪ bin(bi1 ) ∪ bin(bj2 ), and show that U is a
vertex cover of Gx,y .
First, U covers all the edges inside the cliques A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 , as it contains k − 1 nodes
from each clique. These nodes also cover all the edges connecting nodes in A1 to nodes in
A2 and all the edges connecting nodes in B1 to nodes in B2 . Furthermore, U covers any edge
connecting some node u ∈ (A1 \{ai1 })∪(A2 \{aj2 })∪(B1 \{bi1 })∪(B2 \{bj2 }) with the bit-gadgets.
For each node s ∈ ai1 , aj2 , bi1 , bj2 , the nodes bin(s) are in U , so U also cover the edges connecting
s to the bit gadget. Finally, U covers all the edges inside the bit gadgets, as from each 4-cycle
(fAh` , thA` , fBh ` , thB` ) it contains two non-adjacent nodes: if ih = 0 then fAh1 , fBh 1 ∈ U and otherwise
thA1 , thB1 ∈ U , and if jh = 0 then fAh2 , fBh 2 ∈ U and otherwise thA2 , thB2 ∈ U . We thus have that U
is a vertex cover of size 4(k − 1) + 4 log k, as needed.
For the other implication, let U ⊆ V be a vertex cover of Gx,y of size 4(k − 1) + 4 log k.
As the set of edges of G is contained in the set of edges of Gx,y , U is also a cover of G, and
by Claim 2 there are indices i, j ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} such that ai1 , aj2 , bi1 , bj2 are not in U . Since
U is a cover, the graph does not contain the edges (ai1 , aj2 ) and (bi1 , bj2 ), so we conclude that
xi,j = yi,j = 1, which implies that DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
Having constructed the family of lower bound graphs, we are now ready to prove Theorem 2.
Proof of Theorem 2: To complete the proof of Theorem 2, we divide the nodes of G (which
are also the nodes of Gx,y ) into two sets. Let VA = A1 ∪ A2 ∪ FA1 ∪ TA1 ∪ FA2 ∪ TA2 and
VB = V \ VA . Note that n ∈ Θ(k), and thus K = |x| = |y| = Θ(n2 ). Furthermore, note that the
only edges in the cut E(VA , VB ) are the edges between nodes in {FA1 ∪ TA1 ∪ FA2 ∪ TA2 } and
nodes in {FB1 ∪ TB1 ∪ FB2 ∪ TB2 }, which are in total Θ(log n) edges. Since Lemma 1 shows that
{Gx,y } is a family of lower bound graphs, we can apply Theorem 1 on the above partition to
deduce that because of the lower bound for Set Disjointness, any algorithm in the CONGEST
model for deciding whether a given graph has a cover of cardinality M = 4(k − 1) + 4 log k
requires at least Ω(K/ log2 (n)) = Ω(n2 / log2 (n)) rounds.
3.2
Graph Coloring
Given a graph G, we denote by χ(G) the minimal number of colors in a proper vertex-coloring
of G. In this section we consider the problems of coloring a graph in χ colors, computing χ and
approximating it. We prove the next theorem.
Theorem 4. Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that colors a χ-colorable graph
G in χ colors or compute χ(G) requires Ω(n2 / log2 n) rounds.
7
Figure 2: The family of lower bound graphs for coloring, with many edges omitted for clarity. The node
Ca1 is connected to all the nodes in FA1 ∪ TA1 and Cb1 is connected to all the nodes in FB1 ∪ TB1 . The
node Ca2 is connected to all the nodes in FA2 ∪ TA2 and Cb2 is connected to all the nodes in FB2 ∪ TB2 .
Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that decides if χ(G) ≤ c for a given
integer c, requires Ω((n − c)2 /(c log n + log2 n)) rounds.
We give a detailed lower bound construction for the first part of the theorem, by showing
that distinguishing χ ≤ 3 from χ ≥ 4 is hard. Then, we extend our construction to deal with
deciding whether χ ≤ c.
The fixed graph construction: We describe a family of lower bound graphs, which builds
upon the family of graphs defined in Section 3.1. We define G = (V, E) as follows (see Figure 2).
There are four sets of size k: A1 = {ai1 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1}, A2 = {ai2 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1},
B1 = {bi1 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1} and B2 = {bi2 | 0 ≤ i ≤ k − 1}. As opposed to the construction
in Section 3.1, the nodes of these sets are not connected to one another. In addition, as in
Section 3.1, for each set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 }, there are two corresponding sets of nodes of size
log k, denoted FS = {fSh | 0 ≤ h ≤ log k − 1} and TS = {thS | 0 ≤ h ≤ log k − 1}. For each
h ∈ {0, . . . , log k − 1} and ` ∈ {1, 2}, the nodes (fAh` , thA` , fBh ` , thB` ) constitute a 4-cycle. Each
node si` in a set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 } is connected by to all nodes in bin(si` ). Up to here, the
construction differs from the construction in Section 3.1 only by not having edges inside the
sets A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 .
We now add the following two gadgets to the graph.
1. We add three nodes Ca0 , Ca1 , Ca2 connected as a triangle, another set of three nodes Cb0 , Cb1 , Cb2
connected as a triangle, and edges connecting Cai to Cbj for each i 6= j ∈ {0, 1, 2}. We
connect all the nodes of the form fAh1 , thA1 , h ∈ {0, . . . , log k − 1}, to Ca1 . Similarly, we
8
connect all the nodes fBh 1 , thB1 to Cb1 , the nodes fAh2 , thA2 to Ca2 and the nodes fBh 2 , thB2 to
Cb2 .
i i
2. For
each
set
S
∈
A
,
A
,
B
,
B
,
we
add
two
sets
of
nodes,
S̄
=
s̄` | s` ∈ S and S̄¯ =
1
2
1
2
i i
s̄¯` | s` ∈ S . For each ` ∈ {1, 2} and i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1} we connect a path (si` , s̄i` , s̄¯i` ), and
for each ` ∈ {1, 2} and i ∈ {0, . . . , n − 2}, we connect s̄¯i` to s̄i+1
` .
In addition, we connect the gadgets by the edges:
¯i1 ), for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; (Ca2 , ā01 ) and (Ca2 , ā
¯k−1
(a) (Ca2 , ai1 ) and (Ca1 , ā
1 ).
(b) (Cb2 , bi1 ) and (Cb1 , ¯b̄i1 ), for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; (Cb2 , b̄01 ) and (Cb2 , ¯b̄k−1
1 ).
¯i2 ), for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; (Ca1 , ā02 ) and (Ca1 , ā
¯k−1
(c) (Ca1 , ai2 ) and (Ca2 , ā
2 ).
(d) (Cb1 , bi2 ) and (Cb2 , ¯b̄i2 ), for each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}; (Cb1 , b̄02 ) and (Cb1 , ¯b̄2k−1 ).
Assume there is a proper 3-coloring of G. Denote by c0 , c1 and c2 the colors of Ca0 , Ca1 and
respectively. By construction, these are also the colors of Cb0 , Cb1 and Cb2 , respectively. For
the nodes appearing in Section 3.1, coloring a node by c0 is analogous to not including it in the
vertex cover.
Ca2
Claim 3. In each set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 }, at least one node is colored by c0 .
Proof. We start by proving the claim for S = A1 . Assume, towards a contradiction, that all
nodes of A1 are colored by c1 and c2 . All these nodes are connected to Ca2 , so they must all be
colored by c1 . Hence, all the nodes āi1 , i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, are colored by c0 and c2 . The nodes
¯i1 , i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, are connected to Ca1 , so they are colored by c0 and c2 as well.
ā
¯k−1
¯01 , ā11 , ā
¯11 , . . . āk−1
Hence, we have a path (ā01 , ā
1 , ā1 ) with an even number of nodes, starting
k−1
0
¯1 . This path must be colored by alternating c0 and c2 , but both ā01 and
in ā1 and ending in ā
k−1
¯1 are connected to Ca2 , so they cannot be colored by c2 , a contradiction.
ā
A similar proof shows the claim for S = B1 . For S ∈ {A2 , B2 }, we use a similar argument
but change the roles of c1 and c2 .
Claim 4. For each i ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}, the node ai1 is colored by c0 iff bi1 is colored by c0 and
the node ai2 is colored by c0 iff bi2 is colored by c0 .
Proof. Assume ai1 is colored by c0 , so all of its adjacent nodes bin(ai1 ) can only be colored by
c1 or c2 . As all of these nodes are connected to C1a , they must be colored by c2 . Similarly, if a
node bj1 in B1 is colored by c0 , then the nodes bin(bj1 ), which are also adjacent to C1b , must be
colored by c2 .
If i 6= j then there must be a bit i such that ih 6= jh , and there must be a pair of neighboring
nodes (fAh1 , thB1 ) or (thA1 , fBh 1 ) which are colored by c2 . Thus, the only option is i = j. By
Claim 3, there is a node in B1 that is colored by c0 , and so it must be bi1 .
An analogous argument shows that if bi1 is colored by c0 , then so does ai1 . For ai2 and bi2 ,
similar arguments apply, where c1 plays the role of c2 .
2
Adding edges corresponding to the strings x and y: Given two bit strings x, y ∈ {0, 1}k ,
we augment the graph G described above with additional edges, which defines Gx,y .
Assume x and y are indexed by pairs of the form (i, j) ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}2 . To construct Gx,y ,
add edges to G by the following rules: if xi,j = 0 then add the edge (ai1 , aj2 ), and if yi,j = 0
then add the edge (bi1 , bj2 ). To prove that {Gx,y } is a family of lower bound graphs, it remains
to prove the next lemma.
Lemma 2. The graph Gx,y is 3-colorable iff DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
9
Proof. For the first direction, assume Gx,y is 3-colorable, and denote the colors by c0 , c1 and
c2 , as before. By Claim 3, there are nodes ai1 ∈ A1 and aj2 ∈ A2 that are both colored by c0 .
Hence, the edge (ai1 , aj2 ) does not exist in Gx,y , implying xi,j = 1. By Claim 4, the nodes bi1 and
bj2 are also colored c0 , so yi,j = 1 as well, giving that DISJ(x, y) = FALSE, as needed.
For the other direction, assume DISJ(x, y) = FALSE, i.e, there is an index (i, j) ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}2
such that xi,j = yi,j = 1. Consider the following coloring.
1. Color Cai and Cbi by ci , for i ∈ {0, 1, 2}.
0
0
2. Color the nodes ai1 , bi1 , aj2 and bj2 by c0 . Color the nodes ai1 and bi1 , for i0 6= i, by c1 , and
0
0
the nodes aj2 and bj1 , for j 0 6= j, by c2 .
3. Color the nodes of bin(ai1 ) by c2 , and similarly color the nodes of bin(bi1 ) by c2 . Color
k−i
the rest of the nodes in this gadget, i.e. bin(ak−i
1 ) and bin(b1 ), by c0 . Similarly, color
k−j
bin(aj2 ) and bin(bj2 ) by c0 and bin(ak−j
2 ) and bin(b2 ) by c1 .
4. Finally, color the nodes of the forms s̄i` and s̄¯i` as follows.
0
0
0
0
(a) Color āi1 and b̄i1 by c1 , all nodes āi1 and b̄i1 with i0 < i by c0 , and all nodes āi1 and b̄i1
with i0 > i by c2 .
0
0
(b) Similarly, color āi2 and b̄i2 by c2 , all nodes āi2 and b̄i2 with i0 < i by c0 , and all nodes
0
0
āi2 and b̄i2 with i0 > i by c1 .
¯i10 and ¯b̄i10 with i0 < i by c2 , and all nodes ā
¯i10 and ¯b̄i10 with i0 ≥ i by
(c) Color all nodes ā
c0 .
¯i20 and ¯b̄i20 with i0 < i by c1 , and all nodes ā
¯i20 and ¯b̄i20 with
(d) Similarly, color all nodes ā
i0 ≥ i by c0 .
It is not hard to verify that the suggested coloring is indeed a proper 3-coloring of Gx,y , which
completes the proof.
Having constructed the family of lower bound graphs, we are now ready to prove Theorem 4.
Proof of Theorem 4: To complete the proof of Theorem 4, we divide the nodes
of G (which
are also the nodes of Gx,y ) into two sets. Let VA = A1 ∪A2 ∪FA1 ∪TA1 ∪FA2 ∪TA2 ∪ Ca0 , Ca1 , Ca2 ∪
Ā1 ∪ Ā¯1 ∪ Ā2 ∪ Ā¯2 , and VB = V \ VA . Note that n ∈ Θ(k).
The edges in the cut E(VA , VB ) are the 6 edges connecting Ca0 , Ca1 , Ca2 and Cb0 , Cb1 , Cb2 ,
and 2 edges for every 4-cycle of the nodes of FA1 ∪ TA1 ∪ FB1 ∪ TB1 and FA2 ∪ TA2 ∪ FB2 ∪ TB2 , for
a total of Θ(log n) edges. Since Lemma 2 shows that {Gx,y } is a family of lower bound graphs
with respect to DISJK , K = k 2 ∈ Θ(n2 ) and the predicate χ ≤ 3, we can apply Theorem 1 on
the above partition to deduce that any algorithm in the CONGEST model for deciding whether
a given graph is 3-colorable requires at least Ω(n2 / log2 n) rounds.
Any algorithm that computes χ of the input graph, or produces a χ-coloring of it, may be
used to deciding whether χ ≤ 3, in at most O(D) additional rounds. Thus, the lower bound
applies to these problems as well.
Our construction and proof naturally extend to handle c-coloring, for any c ≥ 3. To this
end, we add to G (and to Gx,y ) new nodes denoted Cai , i ∈ {3, . . . , c − 1}, and connect them to
all of VA , and new nodes denoted Cbi , i ∈ {3, . . . , c − 1}, and connect them to all of VB and also
to Ca0 , Ca1 and Ca2 . The nodes Cai are added to Va , and the rest are added to Vb , which increases
the cut size by Θ(c) edges.
Assume the extended graph is colorable by c colors, and denote by ci the color of the
node Cai (these nodes are connected by a clique, so their colors are distinct). The nodes Cbi ,
i ∈ {2, . . . , c − 1} form a clique, and they are all connected to the nodes Ca0 , Ca1 and Ca2 , so
they are colored by the colors {c3 , . . . , cc−1 }, in some order. All the original nodes of VA are
10
connected to Cai , i ∈ {3, . . . , c − 1}, and all the original nodes of VB are connected to Cbi ,
i ∈ {3, . . . , c − 1}, so the original graph must be colored by 3 colors, which we know is possible
iff DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
We added 2c − 6 nodes to the graph, so the inputs strings are of length K = n − 2c + 6.
Thus, the new graphs constitute a family of lower bound graphs with respect to EQK and the
predicate χ ≤ c, the communication complexity of EQK is in Ω(K 2 ) = Ω((n − c)2 ), the cut size
is Θ(c + log n), and Theorem 1 completes the proof.
A lower bound for (4/3 − )-approximation: Finally, we extend our construction to give a
lower bound for approximate coloring. That is, we show a similar lower bound for computing a
(4/3 − ε)-approximation to χ and for finding a coloring in (4/3 − ε)χ colors.
Observe that since χ is integral, any (4/3 − )-approximation algorithm must return the
exact solution in case χ = 3. Thus, in order to rule out the possibility for an algorithm which
is allowed to return a (4/3 − ε)-approximation which is not the exact solution, we need a more
general construction. For any integer c, we show a lower bound for distinguishing between the
case χ ≤ 3c and χ ≥ 4c.
Claim 5. Given an integer c, any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that distinguishes a graph G with χ(G) ≤ 3c from a graph with χ(G) ≥ 4c requires Ω(n2 /(c3 log2 n))
rounds.
To prove Claim 5 we show a family of lower bound graphs with respect to the DISJK
function, where K ∈ Θ(n2 /c2 ), and the predicate χ ≤ 3c (TRUE) or χ ≥ 4c (FALSE). The
predicate is not defined for other values of χ.
We create a graph Gcx,y , composed of c copies of Gx,y . The i-th copy is denoted Gx,y (i),
and its nodes are partitioned into VA (i) and VB (i). We connect all the nodes of VA (i) to all
nodes of VA (j), for each i 6= j. Similarly, we connect all the nodes of VB (i) to all the nodes of
VB (j). This construction guarantees that each copy is colored by different colors, and hence if
DISJ(x, y) = FALSE then χ(Gcx,y ) = 3c and otherwise χ(Gcx,y ) ≥ 3c. Therefore, Gcx,y is a family
of lower bound graphs.
Proof of Claim 5: Note that n ∈ Θ(kc). Thus, K = |x| = |y| = n2 /c2 . Furthermore,
observe that for each Gx,y (i), there are O(log n) edges in the cut, so in total Gcx,y contains
O(c log n) edges in the cut. Since we showed that Gcx,y is a family of lower bound graphs,
we can apply Theorem 1 to deduce that because of the lower bound for Set Disjointness, any
algorithm in the CONGEST model for distinguishing between χ ≤ 3c and χ ≥ 4c requires at
least Ω(n2 /c3 log2 (n)) rounds.
For any > 0 and any c it holds that (4/3 − )3c < 4c. Thus, we can choose c to be an
arbitrary constant to achieve the following theorem.
Theorem 5. For any constant ε > 0, any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that
computes a (4/3 − ε)-approximation to χ requires Ω(n2 / log2 n) rounds.
4
Quadratic and Near-Quadratic Lower Bounds for Problems
in P
In this section we support our claim that what makes problems hard for the CONGEST model is
not necessarily them being NP-hard problems. First, we address a class of subgraph detection
problems, which requires detecting cycles of length 8 and a given weight, and show a nearquadratic lower bound on the number of rounds required for solving it, although its sequential
complexity is polynomial. Then, we define a problem which we call the Identical Subgraphs
11
Figure 3: The family of lower bound graphs for detecting weighted cycles, with many edges omitted
for clarity. Here, x0,1 = 1 and yk−1,k−1 = 1. Thus, a01 is connected to a12 by an edge of weight
k 3 +k·0+1 = k 3 +1, and bk−1
is connected to bk−1
by an edge of weight k 3 −(k(k−1)+k−1) = k 3 −k 2 +1.
1
2
All the dashed edges are of weight 0.
Detection problem, in which the goal is to decide whether two given subgraphs are identical.
While this last problem is rather artificial, it allows us to obtain a strictly quadratic lower bound
for the CONGEST model, with a problem that requires only a single-bit output.
4.1
Weighted Cycle Detection
In this section we show a lower bound on the number of rounds needed in order to decide the
graph contains a cycle of length 8 and weight W , such that W is a polylog(n)-bit value given
as an input. Note that this problem can be solved
easily in polynomial time in the sequential
n
setting by simply checking all of the at most 8 cycles of length 8.
Theorem 6. Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model that decides if a graph with edge
weights w : E → [0, poly(n)] contains a cycle of length 8 and weight W requires Ω(n2 / log2 n)
rounds.
Similarly to the previous sections, to prove Theorem 6 we describe a family of lower bound
graphs with respect to the Set Disjointness function and the predicate P that says that the
graph contains a cycle of length 8 and weight W .
The fixed graph construction: The fixed graph construction G = (V, E) is defined as follows.
The set of nodes contains four sets A1 , A2 , B1 and B2 , each of size k. To simplify our proofs in
this section, we assume that k ≥ 3. For each set S ∈ {A1 , A2 , B1 , B2 } there is a node cS , which
is connected to each of the nodes in S by an edge of weight 0. In addition there is an edge
between cA1 and cB1 of weight 0 and an edge between cA2 and cB2 of weight 0 (see Figure 3).
Adding edges corresponding to the strings x and y: Given two binary strings x, y ∈
2
{0, 1}k , we augment the fixed graph G defined in the previous section with additional edges,
which defines Gx,y . Recall that we assume that k ≥ 3. Let x and y be indexed by pairs of
the form (i, j) ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}2 . For each (i, j) ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}2 , we add to Gx,y the following
edges. If xi,j = 1, then we add an edge of weight k 3 + ki + j between the nodes ai1 and aj2 . If
yi,j = 1, then we add an edge of weight k 3 − (ki + j) between the nodes bi1 and bj2 . We denote
by InputEdges the set of edges {(u, v) | u ∈ A1 ∧ v ∈ A2 } ∪ {(u, v) | u ∈ B1 ∧ v ∈ B2 }, and we
denote by w(u, v) the weight of the edge (u, v).
12
Observe that the graph does not contain edges of negative weight. Furthermore, the weight
of any edge in InputEdges does not exceed k 3 + k 2 − 1, which is the weight of the edge
k−1
(ak−1
1 , a2 ), in case xk−1,k−1 = 1. Similarly, the weight of an edge in InputEdges is not less
k−1
3
than k − k 2 + 1, which is the weight of the edge (bk−1
1 , b2 ), in case yk−1,k−1 = 1. Using these
two simple observations, we deduce the following claim.
Claim 6. For any cycle of weight 2k 3 , the number of edges it contains that are in InputEdges
is exactly two.
Proof. Let C be a cycle of weight 2k 3 , and assume for the sake of contradiction that C does
not contain exactly two edges from InputEdges. In case C contains exactly one edge from
InputEdges, then the weight of C is at most k 3 + k 2 − 1 < 2k 3 , because all the other edges
of C are of weight 0. Otherwise, in case C contains three or more edges from InputEdges, it
holds that the weight of C is at least 3k 3 − 3k 2 + 3 > 2k 3 , because all the other edges on C are
of non-negative weight.
To prove that {Gx,y } satisfies the definition of a family of lower bound graphs, we prove the
following lemma.
Lemma 3. The graph Gx,y contains a cycle of length 8 and weight W = 2k 3 if and only if
DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
Proof. For the first direction, assume that DISJ(x, y) = FALSE and let 0 ≤ i, j ≤ k − 1 be such
that xi,j = 1 and yi,j = 1. Consider the cycle (ai1 , cA1 , cB1 , bi1 , bj2 , cB2 , cA2 , aj2 ). It is easy to verify
that this is a cycle of length 8 and weight w(aj1 , ai2 ) + w(bi1 , bj2 ) = k 3 + ki + j + k 3 − ki − j = 2k 3 ,
as needed.
For the other direction, assume that the graph contains a cycle C of length 8 and weight 2k 3 .
By Claim 6, C contains exactly two edges from InputEdges. Denote these two edges by (u1 , v1 )
and (u2 , v2 ). Since all the other edges in C are of weight 0, the weight of C is w(u1 , v1 )+w(u2 , v2 ).
The rest of the proof is by case analysis, as follows. First, it is not possible that (u1 , v1 ), (u2 , v2 ) ∈
{(u, v) | u ∈ A1 ∧v ∈ A2 }, since in this case w(u1 , v1 )+w(u2 , v2 ) ≥ w(a01 , a02 )+w(a01 , a12 ) = 2k 3 +1.
Similarly, it is not possible that (u1 , v1 ), (u2 , v2 ) ∈ {(u, v) | u ∈ B1 ∧ v ∈ B2 }, since in this case
w(u1 , v1 )+w(u2 , v2 ) ≤ w(b01 , b02 )+w(b01 , b12 ) = 2k 3 −1. Finally, suppose without loss of generality
that (u1 , v1 ) ∈ {(u, v) | u ∈ A1 ∧ v ∈ A2 } and (u2 , v2 ) ∈ {(u, v) | u ∈ B1 ∧ v ∈ B2 }. Denote
0
0
0
0
u1 = ai1 , u2 = aj1 , v1 = bi1 and v2 = bj2 . It holds that w(ai1 , aj2 ) + w(bi1 , bj2 ) = 2k 3 if and only if
i = i0 and j = j 0 , which implies that xi,j = 1 and yi,j = 1 and DISJ(x, y) = FALSE.
Having constructed the family of lower bound graphs, we are now ready to prove Theorem 6.
Proof of Theorem 6: To complete the proof of Theorem 6, we divide the nodes of G (which
are also the nodes of Gx,y ) into two sets. Let VA = A1 ∪ A2 ∪ {cA1 , cA2 } and VB = V \ VA .
Note that n ∈ Θ(k). Thus, K = |x| = |y| = Θ(n2 ). Furthermore, note that the only edges in
the cut E(VA , VB ) are the edges (cA1 , cB1 ) and (cA2 , cB2 ). Since Lemma 3 shows that {Gx,y }
is a family of lower bound graphs, we apply Theorem 1 on the above partition to deduce that
because of the lower bound for Set Disjointness, any algorithm in the CONGEST model for
deciding whether a given graph contains a cycle of length 8 and weight W = 2k 3 requires at
least Ω(K/ log n) = Ω(n2 / log n) rounds.
4.2
Identical Subgraphs Detection
In this section we show the strongest possible, quadratic lower bound, for a problem which can
be solved in linear time in the sequential setting.
Consider the following sequential specification of a graph problem.
13
Definition 2. (The Identical Subgraphs Detection Problem)
Given a weighted input graph G = (V, E, w), with an edge-weight function w : E → {0, . . . , W − 1},
W ∈ poly n, such that the set of nodes V is partitioned into two enumerated sets of the same
size, VA = {a0 , ..., ak−1 } and VB = {b0 , ..., bk−1 }, the Identical Subgraphs Detection problem is
to determine whether the subgraph induced by the set VA is identical to the subgraph induced by
the set VB , in the sense that for each 0 ≤ i, j ≤ k − 1 it holds that (ai , aj ) ∈ E if and only if
(bi , bj ) ∈ E and w(ai , aj ) = w(bi , bj ) if these edges exist.
The identical subgraphs detection problem can be solved easily in linear time in the sequential setting by a single pass over the set of edges. However, as we prove next, it requires
a quadratic number of rounds in the CONGEST model, in any deterministic solution (note
that this restriction did not apply in the previous sections). For clarity, we emphasize that in
the distributed setting, the input to each node in the identical subgraphs detection problem is
its enumeration ai or bi , as well as the enumerations of its neighbors and the weights of the
respective edges. The outputs of all nodes should be TRUE if the subgraphs are identical, and
FALSE otherwise.
Theorem 7. Any distributed deterministic algorithm in the CONGEST model for solving the
identical subgraphs detection problem requires Ω(n2 ) rounds.
To prove Theorem 7 we describe a family of lower bound graphs.
The fixed graph construction: The fixed graph G is composed of two k-node cliques on the
node sets VA = {a0 , ..., ak−1 } and VB = {b0 , ..., bk−1 }, and one extra edge (a0 , b0 ).
Adding edge weights corresponding
to the strings x and y: Given two binary strings x
k
and y, each of size K = 2 log n, we augment the graph G with additional edge weights, which
define Gx,y . For simplicity, assume that x and y are vectors of log n-bit numbers each having
k
2 entries enumerated as xi,j and yi,j , with i < j, i, j ∈ {0, . . . , k − 1}. For each such i and j
we set the weights of w(ai , aj ) = xi,j and w(bi , bj ) = yi,j , and we set w(a0 , b0 ) = 0. Note that
{Gx,y } is a family of lower bound graphs with respect to EQK and the predicate P that says
that the subgraphs are identical in the aforemention sense.
Proof of Theorem 7: Note that n ∈ Θ(k), and thus K = |x| = |y| = Θ(n2 log n). Furthermore, the only edge in the cut E(VA , VB ) is the edge (a0 , b0 ). Since we showed that {Gx,y }
is a family of lower bound graphs, we can apply Theorem 1 on the above partition to deduce
that because of the lower bound for EQK , any deterministic algorithm in the CONGEST model
for solving the identical subgraphs detection problem requires at least Ω(K/ log n) = Ω(n2 )
rounds.
We remark that in a distributed algorithm for the identical subgraphs detection problem
running on our family of lower bound graphs, information about essentially all the edges and
weights in the subgraphs induced on VA and VB needs to be sent across the edge (a0 , b0 ). This
might raise the suspicion that this problem is reducible to learning the entire graph, making
the lower bound trivial. To argue that this is far from being the case, we present a randomized
algorithm that solves the identical subgraphs detection problem in O(D) rounds and succeeds
w.h.p. This has the additional benefit of providing the strongest possible separation between
deterministic and randomized complexities for global problems in the CONGEST model, as the
former is Ω(n2 ) and the latter is at most O(D).
Our starting point is the following randomized algorithm for the EQK problem, presented
in [49, Exersise 3.6]. Alice chooses a prime number p among the first K 2 primes uniformly
PK−1 ` at
random. She treats her input string x as a binary representation of an integer x̄ = `=0 2 x` ,
and sends p and x̄ (mod p) to Bob. Bob similarly computes ȳ, compares x̄ mod p with ȳ mod p,
14
and returns TRUE if they are equal and false otherwise. The error probability of this protocol is
at most 1/K.
We present a simple adaptation of this algorithm for the identical subgraph detection problem. Consider the following encoding of a weighted induced subgraph on VA : for each pair i, j
of indices, we have dlog W e + 1 bits, indicating the existence of the edge and its weight (recall
that W ∈ poly n is an upper bound on the edge weights). This weighted induced subgraph
is thus represented by a K ∈ O(n2 log n) bit-string, denoted x = x0 , . . . , xK−1 , and each pair
(i, j) has a set Si,j of indices representing the edge (ai , aj ). Note that the bits {x` | ` ∈ si,j } are
known to both ai and aj , and in the algorithm we use the node with smaller index in order to
encode these bits. Similarly, a K ∈ O(n2 log n) bit-string, denoted y = y0 , . . . , yK−1 encodes a
weighted induced subgraph on VB .
The Algorithm. As standard, assume the input graph is connected. The nodes are
enumerated as in Definition 2. The algorithm starts with some node, say, a0 , constructing a
BFS tree, which completes in O(D) rounds. Then, a0 chooses a prime number p among the
first K 2 primes uniformly at random and sends p to all the nodes over the tree, which takes
O(D) rounds.
P P
Each node ai computes the sum j>i `∈Si,j x` 2` mod p, and the nodes then aggregate
P P
these local sums modulo p up the tree, until a0 computes the sum x̄ mod p = j6=i `∈Si,j x` 2`
mod p. A similar procedure is then invoked w.r.t ȳ. Finally, a0 compares x̄ mod p and ȳ
mod p, and downcasts over the BFS tree its output, which is TRUE if these values are equal and
is FALSE otherwise.
If the subgraphs are identical, a0 always returns TRUE, while otherwise their encoding differs
in at least one bit, and as in the case of EQK , a0 returns TRUE falsely with probability at most
1/K ∈ O(1/n2 ).
Theorem 8. There is a randomized algorithm in the CONGEST model that solves the identical
subgraphs detection problem on any connected graph in O(D) rounds.
5
Weighted APSP
In this section we use the following, natural extension of Definition 1, in order to address more
general 2-party functions, as well as distributed problems that are not decision problems.
For a function f : {0, 1}K1 × {0, 1}K2 → {0, 1}L1 × {0, 1}L2 , we define a family of lower
bound graphs in a similar way as Definition 1, except that we replace item (4) in the definition
with a generalized requirement that says that for Gx,y , the values of the of nodes in VA uniquely
determine the left-hand side of f (x, y), and the values of the of nodes in VB determine the
right-hand side of f (x, y). Next, we argue that theorem similar to Theorem 1 holds for this
case.
Theorem 9. Fix a function f : {0, 1}K1 × {0, 1}K2 → {0, 1}L1 × {0, 1}L2 and a graph problem
P . If there is a family {Gx,y } of lower bound graphs with C = E(VA , VB ) then any deterministic
algorithm for solving P in the CONGEST model requires Ω(CC(f )/ |C| log n) rounds, and any
randomized algorithm for deciding P in the CONGEST model requires Ω(CC R (f )/ |C| log n)
rounds.
The proof is similar to that of Theorem 1. Notice that the only difference between the
theorems, apart from the sizes of the inputs and outputs of f , are with respect to item (4) in
the definition of a family of lower bound graphs. However, the essence of this condition remains
the same and is all that is required by the proof: the values that a solution to P assigns to nodes
in VA determines the output of Alice for f (x, y), and the values that a solution to P assigns to
nodes in VB determines the output of Bob for f (x, y).
15
5.1
A Linear Lower Bound for Weighted APSP
Nanongkai [56] showed that any algorithm in the CONGEST model for computing a poly(n)approximation for weighted all pairs shortest paths (APSP) requires at least Ω(n/ log n) rounds.
In this section we show that a slight modification to this construction yields an Ω(n) lower bound
for computing exact weighted APSP. As explained in the introduction, this gives a separation
between the complexities of the weighted and unweighted versions of APSP. At a high level,
while we use the same simple topology for our lower bound as in [56], the reason that we are
able to shave off the extra logarithmic factor is because our construction uses O(log n) bits for
encoding the weight of each edge out of many optional weights, while in [56] only a single bit is
used per edge for encoding one of only two options for its weight.
Theorem 10. Any distributed algorithm in the CONGEST model for computing exact weighted
all pairs shortest paths requires at least Ω(n) rounds.
The reduction is from the following, perhaps simplest, 2-party communication problem.
Alice has an input string x of size K and Bob needs to learn the string of Alice. Any algorithm
(possibly randomized) for solving this problem requires at least Ω(K) bits of communication,
by a trivial information theoretic argument.
Notice that the problem of having Bob learn Alice’s input is not a binary function as
addressed in Section 2. Similarly, computing weighted APSP is not a decision problem, but
rather a problem whose solution assigns a value to each node (which is its vector of distances
from all other nodes). We therefore use the extended Theorem 9 above.
The fixed graph construction: The fixed graph construction G = (V, E) is defined as
follows. It contains a set of n − 2 nodes, denoted A = {a0 , ..., an−3 }, which are all connected to
an additional node a. The node a is connected to the last node b, by an edge of weight 0.
Adding edge weights corresponding to the string x: Given the binary string x of size
K = (n − 2) log n we augment the graph G with edge weights, which defines Gx , by having each
non-overlapping batch of log n bits encode a weight of an edge from A to a. It is straightforward
to see that Gx is a family of lower bound graphs for a function f where K2 = L1 = 0, since
the weights of the edges determine the right-hand side of the output (while the left-hand side
is empty).
Proof of Theorem 10: To prove Theorem 10, we let VA = A ∪ {a} and VB = {b}. Note that
K = |x| = Θ(n log n). Furthermore, note that the only edge in the cut E(VA , VB ) is the edge
(a, b). Since we showed that {Gx } is a family of lower bound graphs, we apply Theorem 9 on
the above partition to deduce that because K bits are required to be communicated in order
for Bob to know Alice’s K-bit input, any algorithm in the CONGEST model for computing
weighted APSP requires at least Ω(K/ log n) = Ω(n) rounds.
5.2
The Alice-Bob Framework Cannot Give a Super-Linear Lower Bound
for Weighted APSP
In this section we argue that a reduction from any 2-party function with a constant partition
of the graph into Alice and Bob’s sides is provable incapable of providing a super-linear lower
bound for computing weighted all pairs shortest paths in the CONGEST model. A more
detailed inspection of our analysis shows a stronger claim: our claim also holds for algorithms
for the CONGEST-BROADCAST model, where in each round each node must send the same
(log n)-bit message to all of its neighbors. The following theorem states our claim.
Theorem 11. Let f : {0, 1}K1 × {0, 1}K2 → {0, 1}L1 × {0, 1}L2 be a function and let Gx,y
be a family of lower bound graphs w.r.t. f and the weighted APSP problem. When applying
16
Theorem 9 to f and Gx,y , the lower bound obtained for the number of rounds for computing
weighted APSP is at most linear in n.
Roughly speaking, we show that given an input graph G = (V, E) and a partition of the
set of vertices into two sets V = VA ∪ VB , such that the graph induced by the nodes in VA is
simulated by Alice and the graph induced by nodes in VB is simulated by Bob, Alice and Bob
can compute weighted all pairs shortest paths by communicating O(n log n) bits of information
for each node touching the cut C = (VA , VB ) induced by the partition. This means that for
any 2-party function f and any family of lower bound graphs w.r.t. f and weighted APSP
according to the extended definition of Section 5.1, since Alice and Bob can compute weighted
APSP which determines their output for f by exchanging only O(|V (C)|n log n) bits, where
V (C) is the set of nodes touching C, the value CC(f ) is at most O(|V (C)|n log n). But then
the lower bound obtained by Theorem 9 cannot be better than Ω(n), and hence no super-linear
lower can be deduced by this framework as is.
˙ B , E) we denote C = E(VA , VB ). Let V (C) denote
Formally, given a graph G = (V = VA ∪V
the nodes touching the cut C, with CA = V (C) ∩ VA and CB = V (C) ∩ VB . Let GA = (VA , EA )
be the subgraph induced by the nodes in VA and let GB = (VB , EB ) be the subgraph induced
by the nodes in VB . For a graph H, we denote the weighted distance between two nodes u, v
by wdistH (u, v).
˙ B , E, w) be a graph with an edge-weight function w : E →
Lemma 4. Let G = (V = VA ∪V
{1, . . . , W }, such that W ∈ poly n. Suppose that GA , CB , C and the values of w on EA and C
are given as input to Alice, and that GB , CA , C and the values of w on EB and C are given as
input to Bob.
Then, Alice can compute the distances in G from all nodes in VA to all nodes in V and Bob
can compute the distances from all nodes in VB to all the nodes in V , using O(|V (C)| n log n)
bits of communication.
Proof. We describe a protocol for the required computation, as follows. For each node u ∈ CB ,
Bob sends to Alice the weighted distances in GB from u to all nodes in VB , that is, Bob
sends {wdistGB (u, v) | u ∈ CB , v ∈ VB } (or ∞ for pairs of nodes not connected in GB ).
0 , w 0 ) with the nodes V 0 = V ∪ C and edges
Alice constructs a virtual graph G0A = (VA0 , EA
A
B
A
A
0
0 is defined by w 0 (e) = w(e) for each
EA = EA ∪ C ∪ (CB × CB ). The edge-weight function wA
A
0 (u, v) for u, v ∈ C is defined to be the weighted distance between u and
e ∈ EA ∪ C, and wA
B
v in GB , as received from Bob. Alice then computes the set of all weighted distances in G0A ,
{wdistG0A (u, v) | u, v ∈ VA0 }.
Alice assigns her output for the weighted distances in G as follows. For two nodes u, v ∈
VA ∪ CB , Alice outputs their weighted distance in G0A , wdistG0A (u, v). For a node u ∈ VA0 and a
node v ∈ VB \ CB , Alice outputs min{wdistG0A (u, x) + wdistGB (x, v) | x ∈ CB }, where wdistG0A
is the distance in G0A as computed by Alice, and wdistGB is the distance in GB that was sent
by Bob.
For Bob to compute his required weighted distances, for each node u ∈ CA , similar information is sent by Alice to Bob, that is, Alice sends to Bob the weighted distances in GA from u to
all nodes in VA . Bob constructs the analogous graph G0B and outputs his required distance. The
next paragraph formalizes this for completeness, but may be skipped by a convinced reader.
0 , w0 )
Formally, Alice sends {wdistGA (u, v) | u ∈ CA , v ∈ VA }. Bob constructs G0B = (VB0 , EB
B
0 = E ∪C ∪(C ×C ). The edge-weight function w 0 is defined
with VB0 = VB ∪CA and edges EB
B
A
A
B
0 (e) = w(e) for each e ∈ E ∪ C, and w 0 (u, v) for u, v ∈ C is defined to be the weighted
by wB
B
A
B
distance between u and v in GA , as received from Alice (or ∞ if they are not connected in GA ).
Bob then computes the set of all weighted distances in G0B , {wdistG0B (u, v) | u, v ∈ VB0 }. Bob
assigns his output for the weighted distances in G as follows. For two nodes u, v ∈ VB ∪ CA ,
Bob outputs their weighted distance in G0B , wdistG0B (u, v). For a node u ∈ VB0 and a node
17
v ∈ VA \ CA , Bob outputs min{wdistG0B (u, x) + wdistGA (x, v) | x ∈ CA }, where wdistG0B is the
distance in G0B as computed by Bob, and wdistGA is the distance in GA that was sent by Alice.
Complexity. Bob sends to Alice the distances from all nodes in CB to all node in VB , which
takes O(|CB | |VB | log n) bits, and similarly Alice sends O(|CA | |VA | log n) bits to Bob, for a total
of O(|V (C)| n log n) bits.
Correctness. By construction, for every edge (u, v) ∈ CB ×CB in G0A with weight wdistG0A (u, v),
there is a corresponding shortest path Pu,v of the same weight in GB . Hence, for any path
P 0 = (v0 , v1 , . . . , vk ) in G0A between v0 , vk ∈ VA0 , there is a corresponding path Pv0 ,vk of the same
weight in G, where P is obtained from P 0 by replacing every two consecutive nodes vi , vi+1 in
P ∩ CB by the path Pvi ,vi+1 . Thus, wdistG0A (v0 , vk ) ≥ wdistG (v0 , vk ).
On the other hand, for any shortest path P = (v0 , v1 , . . . , vk ) in G connecting v0 , vk ∈ VA0 ,
there is a corresponding path P 0 of the same weight in G0A , where P 0 is obtained from P by
replacing any sub-path (vi , . . . , vj ) of P contained in GB and connecting vi , vj ∈ CB by the
edge (vi , vj ) in G0A . Thus, wdistG (v0 , vk ) ≥ wdistG0A (v0 , vk ). Alice thus correctly computes the
weighted distances between pairs of nodes in VA0 .
It remains to argue about the weighted distances that Alice computes to nodes in VB \ CB .
Any lightest path P in G connecting a node u ∈ VA0 and a nodev ∈ VB \CB must cross at least one
edge of C and thus must contain a node in CB . Therefore, wdistG (u, v) = min{wdistG (u, x) +
wdistG (x, v) | x ∈ CB }. Recall that we have shown that wdistG0A (u, x) = wdistG (u, x) for any
u, x ∈ VA0 . The sub-path of P connecting x and v is a shortest path between these nodes, and
is contained in GB , so wdistGB (x, v) = wdistG (x, v). Hence, the distance min{wdistG0A (u, x) +
wdistGB (x, v) | x ∈ CB } returned by Alice is indeed equal to wdistG (u, v).
The outputs of Bob are correct by the analogous arguments, completing the proof.
Proof of Theorem 11: Let f : {0, 1}K1 ×{0, 1}K2 → {0, 1}L1 ×{0, 1}L2 be a function and let
Gx,y be a family of lower bound graphs w.r.t. f and the weighted APSP problem. By Lemma 4,
Alice and Bob can compute the weighted distances for any graph in Gx,y by exchanging at most
O(|V (C)|n log n) bits, which is at most O(|C|n log n) bits. Since Gx,y is a family of lower
bound graphs w.r.t. f and weighted APSP, condition (4) gives that this number of bits is an
upper bound for CC(f ). Therefore, when applying Theorem 9 to f and Gx,y , the lower bound
obtained for the number of rounds for computing weighted APSP is Ω(CC(f )/|C| log n), which
is no higher than a bound of Ω(n).
Extending to t players: We argue that generalizing the Alice-Bob framework to a sharedblackboard multi-party setting is still insufficient for providing a super-linear lower bound for
weighted APSP. Suppose that we increase the number of players in the above framework to t
players, P0 , . . . , Pt−1 , each simulating the nodes in a set Vi in a partition of V in a family of
lower bound graphs w.r.t. a t-party function f and weighted APSP. That is, the outputs of
nodes in Vi for an algorithm ALG for solving a problem P in the CONGEST model, uniquely
determines the output of player Pi in the function f . The function f is now a function from
{0, 1}K0 × · · · × {0, 1}Kt−1 to {0, 1}L0 × · · · × {0, 1}Lt−1 .
The communication complexity CC(f ) is the total number of bits written on the shared
blackboard by all players. Denote by C the set of cut edges, that is, the edge whose endpoints do not belong to the same Vi . Then, if ALG is a R-rounds algorithm, we have that
writing O(R|C| log n) bits on the shared blackboard suffice for computing f , and so R =
Ω(CC(f )/|C| log n).
We now consider the problem P to be weighted APSP. Let f be a t-party function and
let Gx0 ,...,xt−1 be a family of lower bound graphs w.r.t. f and weighted APSP. We first have
the players write all the edges in C on the shared blackboard, for a total of O(|C| log n) bits.
18
Then, in turn, each player Pi writes the weighted distances from all nodes in Vi to all nodes in
V (C) ∩ Vi . This requires no more than O(|V (C)|n log n) bits.
It is easy to verify that every player Pi can now compute the weighted distances from all
nodes in Vi to all nodes in V , in a manner that is similar to that of Lemma 4.
This gives an upper bound on CC(f ), which implies that any lower bound obtained by a reduction from f is Ω(CC(f )/|C| log n), which is no larger than Ω((|V (C)|n+|C|) log n/|C| log n),
which is no larger than Ω(n), since |V (C)| ≤ 2|C|.
Remark 1: Notice that the t-party simulation of the algorithm for the CONGEST model does
not require a shared blackboard and can be done in the peer-to-peer multiparty setting as well,
since simulating the delivery of a message does not require the message to be known globally.
This raises the question of why would one consider a reduction to the CONGEST model from
the stronger shared-blackboard model to begin with. Notice that our argument above for t
players does not translate to the peer-to-peer multiparty setting, because it assumes that the
edges of the cut C can be made global knowledge within writing |C| log n bits on the blackboard.
However, what our extension above shows is that if there is a lower bound that is to be obtained
using a reduction from peer-to-peer t-party computation, it must use a function f that is strictly
harder to compute in the peer-to-peer setting compared with the shared-blackboard setting.
Remark 2: We suspect that a similar argument can be applied for the framework of non-fixed
Alice-Bob partitions (e.g., [64]), but this requires precisely defining this framework which is not
addressed in this version.
6
Discussion
This work provides the first super-linear lower bounds for the CONGEST model, raising a
plethora of open questions. First, we showed for some specific problems, namely, computing a
minimum vertex cover, a maximum independent set and a χ-coloring, that they are nearly as
hard as possible for the CONGEST model. However, we know that approximate solutions for
some of these problems can be obtained much faster, in a polylogarithmic number of rounds or
even less. A family of specific open questions is then to characterize the exact trade-off between
approximation factors and round complexities for these problems.
Another specific open question is the complexity of weighted APSP, which has also been
asked in previous work [26,56]. Our proof that the Alice-Bob framework is incapable of providing
super-linear lower bounds for this problem may be viewed as providing evidence that weighted
APSP can be solved much faster than is currently known. Together with the recent subquadratic algorithm of [28], this brings another angle to the question: can weighted APSP be
solved in linear time?
Finally, we propose a more general open question which addresses a possible classification of
complexities of global problems in the CONGEST model. Some such problems have complexities
√
of Θ(D), such as constructing a BFS tree. Others have complexities of Θ̃(D + n), such
as finding an MST. Some problems have near-linear complexities, such as unweighted APSP.
And now we know about the family of hardest problems for the CONGEST model, whose
complexities are near-quadratic. Do these complexities capture all possibilities, when natural
global graph problems are concerned? Or are there such problems with a complexity of, say,
Θ(n1+δ ), for some constant 0 < δ < 1? A similar question was recently addressed in [19] for
the LOCAL model, and we propose investigating the possibility that such a hierarchy exists for
the CONGEST model.
Acknowledgement: We thank Amir Abboud, Ohad Ben Baruch, Michael Elkin, Yuval Filmus
and Christoph Lenzen for useful discussions.
19
References
[1] Amir Abboud, Keren Censor-Hillel, and Seri Khoury. Near-linear lower bounds for distributed distance computations, even in sparse networks. In Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 29–42, 2016.
[2] Amir Abboud and Kevin Lewi. Exact weight subgraphs and the k-sum conjecture. In Proceedings of the 40th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming,
ICALP, Part I, pages 1–12, 2013.
[3] Amir Abboud, Kevin Lewi, and Ryan Williams. Losing weight by gaining edges. In
Proceedings of the 22th Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, ESA, pages 1–12,
2014.
[4] Noga Alon, Raphael Yuster, and Uri Zwick. Finding and counting given length cycles.
Algorithmica, 17(3):209–223, 1997.
[5] Matti Åstrand, Patrik Floréen, Valentin Polishchuk, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela, and Jara
Uitto. A local 2-approximation algorithm for the vertex cover problem. In Proceedings of
the 23rd International Symposium on Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 191–205, 2009.
[6] Matti Åstrand and Jukka Suomela. Fast distributed approximation algorithms for vertex
cover and set cover in anonymous networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM
Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA, pages 294–302, 2010.
[7] Reuven Bar-Yehuda, Keren Censor-Hillel, Mohsen Ghaffari, and Gregory Schwartzman.
Distributed approximation of maximum independent set and maximum matching. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, 2017.
[8] Reuven Bar-Yehuda, Keren Censor-Hillel, and Gregory Schwartzman. A distributed (2+)approximation for vertex cover in o(logδ/ log log δ) rounds. In Proceedings of the 2016
ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 3–8, 2016.
[9] Leonid Barenboim. On the locality of some np-complete problems. In Proceedings of the
39th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, ICALP, Part
II, pages 403–415, 2012.
[10] Leonid Barenboim. Deterministic (∆ + 1)-coloring in sublinear (in ∆) time in static,
dynamic, and faulty networks. J. ACM, 63(5):47:1–47:22, 2016.
[11] Leonid Barenboim and Michael Elkin. Deterministic distributed vertex coloring in polylogarithmic time. J. ACM, 58(5):23:1–23:25, 2011.
[12] Leonid Barenboim and Michael Elkin. Combinatorial algorithms for distributed graph
coloring. Distributed Computing, 27(2):79–93, 2014.
[13] Leonid Barenboim, Michael Elkin, and Fabian Kuhn. Distributed (delta+1)-coloring in
linear (in delta) time. SIAM J. Comput., 43(1):72–95, 2014.
[14] Leonid Barenboim, Michael Elkin, Seth Pettie, and Johannes Schneider. The locality of
distributed symmetry breaking. J. ACM, 63(3):20:1–20:45, 2016.
[15] Marijke H. L. Bodlaender, Magnús M. Halldórsson, Christian Konrad, and Fabian Kuhn.
Brief announcement: Local independent set approximation. In Proceedings of the ACM
Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 93–95, 2016.
20
[16] Keren Censor-Hillel, Petteri Kaski, Janne H. Korhonen, Christoph Lenzen, Ami Paz, and
Jukka Suomela. Algebraic methods in the congested clique. In Proceedings of the 2015
ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, 2015.
[17] Keren Censor-Hillel, Telikepalli Kavitha, Ami Paz, and Amir Yehudayoff. Distributed construction of purely additive spanners. In Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium
on Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 129–142, 2016.
[18] Yi-Jun Chang, Tsvi Kopelowitz, and Seth Pettie. An exponential separation between
randomized and deterministic complexity in the LOCAL model. In Proceedings of the
IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS, pages 615–
624, 2016.
[19] Yi-Jun Chang and Seth Pettie. A time hierarchy theorem for the LOCAL model. CoRR,
abs/1704.06297, 2017.
[20] Kai-Min Chung, Seth Pettie, and Hsin-Hao Su. Distributed algorithms for the lovász
local lemma and graph coloring. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of
Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 134–143, 2014.
[21] Richard Cole and Uzi Vishkin. Deterministic coin tossing with applications to optimal
parallel list ranking. Information and Control, 70(1):32–53, 1986.
[22] Andrzej Czygrinow, Michal Hanckowiak, and Wojciech Wawrzyniak. Fast distributed approximations in planar graphs. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Symposium on
Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 78–92, 2008.
[23] Søren Dahlgaard, Mathias Bæk Tejs Knudsen, and Morten Stöckel. Finding even cycles
faster via capped k-walks. CoRR, abs/1703.10380, 2017.
[24] Danny Dolev, Christoph Lenzen, and Shir Peled. ”tri, tri again”: Finding triangles and
small subgraphs in a distributed setting - (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the 26th
International Symposium on Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 195–209, 2012.
[25] Andrew Drucker, Fabian Kuhn, and Rotem Oshman. On the power of the congested clique
model. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing,
PODC, pages 367–376, 2014.
[26] Michael Elkin. Distributed approximation: a survey. SIGACT News, 35(4):40–57, 2004.
[27] Michael Elkin. An unconditional lower bound on the time-approximation trade-off for the
distributed minimum spanning tree problem. SIAM J. Comput., 36(2):433–456, 2006.
[28] Michael Elkin. Distributed exact shortest paths in sublinear time. CoRR, abs/1703.01939,
2017.
[29] Yuval Emek, Christoph Pfister, Jochen Seidel, and Roger Wattenhofer. Anonymous networks: randomization = 2-hop coloring. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 96–105, 2014.
[30] Pierre Fraigniaud, Cyril Gavoille, David Ilcinkas, and Andrzej Pelc. Distributed computing
with advice: information sensitivity of graph coloring. Distributed Computing, 21(6):395–
403, 2009.
[31] Pierre Fraigniaud, Marc Heinrich, and Adrian Kosowski. Local conflict coloring. In Proceedings of the IEEE 57th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, FOCS,
pages 625–634, 2016.
21
[32] Silvio Frischknecht, Stephan Holzer, and Roger Wattenhofer. Networks cannot compute
their diameter in sublinear time. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete
Algorithms, SODA, pages 1150–1162, 2012.
[33] Mika Göös and Jukka Suomela. Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing. Theory
of Computing, 12(1):1–33, 2016.
[34] Fabrizio Grandoni, Jochen Könemann, and Alessandro Panconesi. Distributed weighted
vertex cover via maximal matchings. ACM Trans. Algorithms, 5(1):6:1–6:12, 2008.
[35] Fabrizio Grandoni, Jochen Könemann, Alessandro Panconesi, and Mauro Sozio. A primaldual bicriteria distributed algorithm for capacitated vertex cover. SIAM J. Comput.,
38(3):825–840, 2008.
[36] Michal Hanckowiak, Michal Karonski, and Alessandro Panconesi. On the distributed complexity of computing maximal matchings. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 15(1):41–57, 2001.
[37] David G. Harris, Johannes Schneider, and Hsin-Hao Su. Distributed (∆+1)-coloring in
sublogarithmic rounds. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on
Theory of Computing, STOC, pages 465–478, 2016.
[38] Monika Henzinger, Sebastian Krinninger, and Danupon Nanongkai. A deterministic almosttight distributed algorithm for approximating single-source shortest paths. In Proceedings
of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC, pages
489–498, 2016.
[39] Stephan Holzer, David Peleg, Liam Roditty, and Roger Wattenhofer. Distributed 3/2approximation of the diameter. In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on
Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 562–564, 2014.
[40] Stephan Holzer and Nathan Pinsker. Approximation of distances and shortest paths in the
broadcast congest clique. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Principles
of Distributed Systems, OPODIS, pages 6:1–6:16, 2015.
[41] Stephan Holzer and Roger Wattenhofer. Optimal distributed all pairs shortest paths and
applications. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 355–364, 2012.
[42] Qiang-Sheng Hua, Haoqiang Fan, Lixiang Qian, Ming Ai, Yangyang Li, Xuanhua Shi, and
Hai Jin. Brief announcement: A tight distributed algorithm for all pairs shortest paths
and applications. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms
and Architectures, SPAA, pages 439–441, 2016.
[43] Allan Grønlund Jørgensen and Seth Pettie. Threesomes, degenerates, and love triangles.
In Proceedings of the 55th IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science,
FOCS, pages 621–630, 2014.
[44] Samir Khuller, Uzi Vishkin, and Neal E. Young. A primal-dual parallel approximation
technique applied to weighted set and vertex covers. J. Algorithms, 17(2):280–289, 1994.
[45] Liah Kor, Amos Korman, and David Peleg. Tight bounds for distributed MST verification.
In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer
Science, STACS, pages 69–80, 2011.
[46] Christos Koufogiannakis and Neal E. Young. Distributed and parallel algorithms for
weighted vertex cover and other covering problems. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual
ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 171–179, 2009.
22
[47] Fabian Kuhn, Thomas Moscibroda, and Roger Wattenhofer. The price of being nearsighted. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete
Algorithms, SODA, pages 980–989, 2006.
[48] Fabian Kuhn, Thomas Moscibroda, and Roger Wattenhofer. Local computation: Lower
and upper bounds. J. ACM, 63(2):17:1–17:44, 2016.
[49] Eyal Kushilevitz and Noam Nisan. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University
Press, New York, NY, USA, 1997.
[50] Christoph Lenzen and Boaz Patt-Shamir. Fast partial distance estimation and applications. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing,
PODC, 2015.
[51] Christoph Lenzen and David Peleg. Efficient distributed source detection with limited
bandwidth. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing,
PODC, pages 375–382, 2013.
[52] Christoph Lenzen and Roger Wattenhofer. Leveraging linial’s locality limit. In Proceedings
of the 22nd International Symposium on Distributed Computing, DISC, pages 394–407,
2008.
[53] Nathan Linial. Locality in distributed graph algorithms. SIAM J. Comput., 21(1):193–201,
1992.
[54] Dániel Marx and Michal Pilipczuk. Everything you always wanted to know about the
parameterized complexity of subgraph isomorphism (but were afraid to ask). In Proceedings
of the 31st International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS,
pages 542–553, 2014.
[55] Thomas Moscibroda and Roger Wattenhofer. Coloring unstructured radio networks. Distributed Computing, 21(4):271–284, 2008.
[56] Danupon Nanongkai. Distributed approximation algorithms for weighted shortest paths.
In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC,, pages 565–573, 2014.
[57] Danupon Nanongkai, Atish Das Sarma, and Gopal Pandurangan. A tight unconditional
lower bound on distributed randomwalk computation. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual
ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, PODC, pages 257–266, 2011.
[58] Alessandro Panconesi and Romeo Rizzi. Some simple distributed algorithms for sparse
networks. Distributed Computing, 14(2):97–100, 2001.
[59] David Peleg. Distributed Computing: A Locality-Sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial
and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
[60] David Peleg, Liam Roditty, and Elad Tal. Distributed algorithms for network diameter
and girth. In Proceedings of the 39th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages,
and Programming, ICALP, pages 660–672, 2012.
[61] David Peleg and Vitaly Rubinovich. A near-tight lower bound on the time complexity of
distributed minimum-weight spanning tree construction. SIAM J. Comput., 30(5):1427–
1442, 2000.
[62] Seth Pettie and Hsin-Hao Su. Distributed coloring algorithms for triangle-free graphs. Inf.
Comput., 243:263–280, 2015.
23
[63] Valentin Polishchuk and Jukka Suomela. A simple local 3-approximation algorithm for
vertex cover. Inf. Process. Lett., 109(12):642–645, 2009.
[64] Atish Das Sarma, Stephan Holzer, Liah Kor, Amos Korman, Danupon Nanongkai, Gopal
Pandurangan, David Peleg, and Roger Wattenhofer. Distributed verification and hardness
of distributed approximation. SIAM J. Comput., 41(5):1235–1265, 2012.
[65] Johannes Schneider and Roger Wattenhofer. Distributed coloring depending on the chromatic number or the neighborhood growth. In Proceedings of the 18th International Colloquium on Structural Information and Communication Complexity, SIROCCO, pages 246–
257, 2011.
[66] Virginia Vassilevska Williams and Ryan Williams. Finding, minimizing, and counting
weighted subgraphs. SIAM J. Comput., 42(3):831–854, 2013.
24
| 8cs.DS
|
Stein kernels and moment maps
Max Fathi∗
arXiv:1804.04699v1 [math.PR] 12 Apr 2018
April 16, 2018
Abstract
We describe a construction of Stein kernels using moment maps, which
are solutions to a variant of the Monge-Ampère equation. As a consequence,
we show how regularity bounds on these maps control the rate of convergence
in the classical central limit theorem, and derive new rates in KantorovitchWasserstein distance in the log-concave situation, with explicit polynomial
dependence on the dimension.
1
Introduction
Stein’s method is a set of techniques introduced by Stein [33, 34] to estimate distances between probability measures. We refer to the survey [30] for an overview.
We shall be interested in one particular way of implementing Stein’s method in
the Gaussian setting, based on the notion of Stein kernels. Let µ be a probability
measure on Rd . A matrix-valued function τµ : Rd −→ Md (R) is said to be a Stein
kernel for µ (with respect to the standard Gaussian measure γ on Rd ) if for any
smooth test function f taking values in Rd , we have
Z
Z
x · f dν = hτµ , ∇f iHS dν.
(1)
For applications, it is Rgenerally enough to consider the restricted class of test
functions f satisfying (|f |2 + k∇f k2HS )dµ < ∞, in which case both integrals in
(1) are well-defined as soon as τµ ∈ L2 (µ), provided µ has finite second moments.
The motivation behind the definition is that, since the Gaussian measure is
the only probability distribution satisfying the integration by parts formula
Z
Z
x · f dγ = div(f )dγ,
(2)
the Stein kernel τµ coincides with the identity matrix, denoted by Id, if and only
if the measure µ is equal to γ. Hence, the Stein kernel can be used to control
how far µ is from being a standard Gaussian measure in terms of how much it
∗
CNRS and Institut de Mathématiques
[email protected]
1
de
Toulouse,
Université
de
Toulouse,
2
violates the integration by parts formula (2). It appears implicitly in many works
on Stein’s method, and has recently been the topic of more direct investigations
[1, 27, 28, 21, 8]. The one-dimensional case, where Stein kernels can be explicitly
constructed from the density, has been extensively studied [24]. It has applications
to central limit theorems [26], concentration inequalities [29, 21, 32] and random
matrix theory [7].
A related quantity is the Stein discrepancy
Z
2
S(µ) := inf |τ − Id |2 dµ
τ
where the infimum is taken over all possible Stein kernels for µ, since they may not
be unique. This quantity has two main interesting properties: it controls the L2
Kantorovitch-Wasserstein distance to the Gaussian [21], and is monotone along
the central limit theorem [8].
The aim of this work is to describe how we can construct Stein kernels using
a correspondence between centered measures and convex functions, known as the
moment measure problem, or moment map problem, which we shall describe in
Section 2.1. The main motivation was to give a construction of Stein kernels
using optimal transport maps, of which these moment maps can be viewed as a
variant. The Stein kernels we shall build have several nice properties that do not
seem to be necessarily satisfied by previous constructions. Most notably they shall
always takes values that are symmetric, nonnegative matrices. As an application,
we shall derive in Section 3 new bounds on the rate of convergence in the multidimensional central limit theorem when the random variables are log-concave,
with explicit dependence on the dimension.
2
2.1
Stein kernels and moment maps
Moment maps
In [9] (revisited in [31], and following earlier works [36, 11, 3, 23]), the following
theorem was established:
Theorem 2.1 (Cordero-Erausquin and Klartag 2015). Let µ be a centered measure, with finite first moment and that is not supported on a hyperplane. Then
there exists a convex function ϕ such that µ is the pushforward of the probability
measure with density e−ϕ by the map ∇ϕ.
This result can be seen as a variant of the optimal transport problem, where
instead of specifying two measures, we fix a target measure, and look for both an
original measure and a transport map while imposing the constraint that the map
should be the gradient of the potential of the measure. Indeed, here ∇ϕ is also
the Brenier map from optimal transport theory [35] sending e−ϕ onto µ.
The convex function given by this theorem may well not be smooth, most
notably when µ is a combination of Dirac masses. For example, if µ is the uniform
3
measure on {−1, +1}, viewed as a subset of R, the convex function is ϕ(x) = |x| on
R, which is not smooth at the origin. This will cause some issues later on. We can
however assume it satisfies some weak continuity property on the boundary of its
support (the notion of essential continuity, which is described in [9]). A smooth
version of this theorem, under extra assumptions, was previously obtained by
Berman and Berndtson [3], with earlier results due to Wang and Zhu [36] and
Donaldson [11]:
Theorem 2.2 (Berman and Berndtson 2013). Assume that µ is supported on
a compact, open convex set, and that it has a smooth density ρ on its support.
Assume moreover that C ≥ ρ ≥ C −1 on the whole support, for some positive
constant C. Then the convex function ϕ of Theorem 2.1 is smooth and supported
on the whole space Rd .
In this result (which is based on Caffarelli’s regularity theory for MongeAmpère PDEs), the convexity of the support plays an essential role.
We can reformulate those statements as pertaining to solutions of the PDE
e−ϕ = ρ(∇ϕ) det(∇2 ϕ).
(3)
This PDE is a variant of the Monge-Ampère equation, sometimes called the
toric Kähler-Einstein equation. It has been studied in complex geometry, where
it is related to the construction of differential structures with specific properties
on toric varieties (i.e. quotients of the complex space (C∗ )n ). More recently, it
has been studied in [15, 16, 19, 20], where it was used to establish functional
inequalities for log-concave measures.
A relevant remark to the connection with Stein’s method that we shall describe
in the next section is that the standard Gaussian measure is the only fixed point
of the map µ → e−ϕ , where ϕ is the moment map of µ. So in some sense the
moment map already contains some information on how far the measure is from
being Gaussian.
In general, unless the dimension is 1, solutions to (3) are not explicit. One
particular case where it can be determined is for the uniform measure on the unit
d
P
cube [−1, 1]d , where the moment map is of the form ϕ(x) =
2 log cosh(xi /2) +
i=1
C. This can be generalized to uniform measures on centered parallelipipeds by
composing this function with the appropriate linear map.
2.2
The connection with Stein kernels
For now, assume that µ has a density with respect to the Lebesgue measure which
is strictly positive on its support, and is such that the convex function ϕ given by
Theorem 2.1 is C 2 . There exists an optimal transport map sending µ onto e−ϕ ,
which is necessarily ∇ϕ∗ , where ϕ∗ is the Legendre transform of ϕ. ϕ∗ is then also
C 2 : since ∇ϕ∗ is the inverse of ∇ϕ (this is a property of the Legendre transform)
and Hess ϕ is strictly positive on the whole space, ∇ϕ∗ inherits C 1 regularity from
∇ϕ.
4
Theorem 2.3. If µ has a density ρ with respect to the Lebesgue measure, and
the solution ϕ to the PDE (3) is C 2 and supported on the whole space Rd , then
Hess ϕ(∇ϕ∗ ) is a Stein kernel for µ. Moreover, the Stein discrepancy satisfies
Z
2
S(µ) ≤ | Hess ϕ − Id |2HS e−ϕ dx.
In particular, if µ is supported on a compact, convex set and has density
bounded from above and below by positive constants, this result applies.
R
The regularity assumptions can be weakened, indeed if | Hess ϕ − Id |2HS e−ϕ dx
is finite and µ has a continuous density, then the result will still hold. For general
2,1
measures with density and full support, the moment map is only in Wloc
in the
interior of its support [10], which is not enough to make the proof work. But this
is not surprising, since for heavy-tailed random variables the CLT may fail, and
this would rule out existence of a Stein kernel belonging to L2 (µ). For background
on regularity theory for Monge-Ampère PDEs, we refer to the lecture notes [12].
Remark 2.1. An interesting byproduct of this result is that the Stein kernel obtained in this way takes values that are symmetric and positive matrices. In particular, this explains why the explicit formula for Stein kernels in dimension one
defines a nonnegative function.
Remark 2.2. The Stein kernel constructed this way seems to be in general different from the one constructed in [8]. Since when the density is supported on
a compact, convex set and has density bounded from above and below by positive
constants a Poincaré inequality holds, existence of a Stein kernel in that situation
was already proven in [8]. It is the particular structure of the kernel we obtain here
that makes it interesting, as we will see when obtaining new rates of convergence
in the CLT.
Proof. Since ϕ is smooth, we have the Stein equation
Z
Z
−ϕ
∇ϕ · f e dx = Tr(∇f )e−ϕ dx.
There is no boundary term remaining when integrating
by parts because ϕ grows
R
at least linearly at infinity, since it is convex and e−ϕ dx < ∞ (see for example
Lemma 2.1 in [14]).
Fix g a smooth function, and take f (x) = g(∇ϕ(x)) in the above equation.
We get
Z
Z
∇ϕ(x) · g(∇ϕ(x))e−ϕ dx =
hHess ϕ, ∇g(∇ϕ)ie−ϕ dx.
Applying the change of variable y = ∇ϕ∗ (x), which sends µ onto e−ϕ , we obtain
Z
Z
x · g(x)dµ = hHess ϕ(∇ϕ∗ ), ∇gidµ
which ensures that Hess ϕ(∇ϕ∗ ) = (Hess ϕ∗ )−1 is indeed a Stein kernel for µ.
5
The bound on the Stein discrepancy is an immediate consequence of the change
of variable: since Hess ϕ(∇ϕ∗ ) is a Stein kernel, by definition of the Stein discrepancy we have
Z
Z
2
∗
2
S(µ) ≤ | Hess ϕ(∇ϕ ) − Id |HS dµ = | Hess ϕ − Id |2HS e−ϕ dx.
The well-known Caffarelli contraction theorem [6] states that the Brenier map
sending the standard gaussian map onto a uniformly log-concave measure is lipschitz. Klartag [15] proved an analogous estimate for moment maps, which leads
to the following bound on Stein kernels in that setting:
Corollary 2.4. Assume that µ is uniformly convex, that is it is of the form
e−V dx with Hess V ≥ ǫ Id for some ǫ > 0. Then there exists a Stein kernel with
values that are positive symmetric matrices, and which is uniformly bounded, that
is ||τ ||op ≤ ǫ−1 .
In dimension one, this result was pointed out in [32]. Such pointwise estimates
can be used to derive properties of the density and concentration inequalities [29]
and isoperimetric inequalities [32].
Proof. The Stein kernel described in this statement is the one built in Theorem
2.3, all that we need to do is to prove the uniform bound on its operator norm.
In [15], it was shown that under the uniform convexity assumption, the moment
map indeed satisfies the uniform bound || Hess ϕ||op ≤ ǫ−1 , and the conclusion
follows.
It would also be possible to build a Stein kernel using the construction of
[7, 27] and the optimal transport map sending the standard Gaussian measure
onto µ. Existence could be proved in the same setting, but there would be two
main downsides: we do not have an analogue to Proposition 3.2 below for those
maps, so we would only get a useful quantitative estimate in the uniformly convex
setting, and due to the particular form of the construction of [7], even in the
latter setting the quantitative estimates would get worse. But we would still get
existence of a Stein kernel that is bounded for uniformly log-concave measures.
3
Application to rates of convergence in the central
limit theorem
We now show how the construction of Stein kernels discussed in the previous
section leads to new estimates on the rate of convergence in the central limit
theorem. The family of distances we shall consider to estimate the distance in the
CLT are the Kantorovitch-Wasserstein distances from optimal transport theory,
defined as
Z
Wp (µ, ν) := inf
||x − y||p2 π(dx, dy)
π
6
where the infimum runs over all couplings of the measures µ and ν. We refer to
the textbook [35] for background on optimal transport.
The following statement is a result of [21] on how Lp bounds on a Stein kernel
control Wasserstein distances to the standard gaussian measure:
Proposition 3.1. Let τ be a Stein kernel for the probability measure µ on Rd .
Then for any p ≥ 2 we have
1/p
Z X
Wp (µ, γ) ≤ Cp d1−2/p
|τij − δij |p dµ
i,j
1/p
R
the value of the p-th moment for a one-dimensional
with Cp = R |x|p dγ
standard gaussian.
These results mean that if we get estimates on Hess ϕ, averaged out against
we can deduce estimates on transport distances. It turns out that when µ is
log-concave and compactly supported, such an estimate was already obtained by
Klartag [15]:
e−ϕ ,
Proposition 3.2. Let µ be a log-concave probability measure, supported on an
open bounded convex set, and with a density bounded from above and below. Then
the essentially-continuous convex function ϕ for which µ is the moment measure
is C 2 and satisfies for any p ≥ 1 and any θ ∈ S d−1
Z
p
Z
∗
p
p 2p
2
|hHess ϕ(∇ϕ )θ, θi| dµ ≤ 8 p
(x · θ) dµ .
We shall give a proof of Klartag’s estimate in Section 3.1. It will be the same
proof as in [15], reformulated in a different language, which may be of interest to
some readers.
Remark 3.1. The results of [15] assume C ∞ smoothness, relying on a result of
[3] to deduce C ∞ smoothness of ϕ. Since we actually only need C 2 smoothness of
ϕ, it turns out we only need continuity of the density.
Combining our construction of Stein kernels, Klartag’s estimate and basic
arguments from Stein’s method, we get the following application to rates of convergence in the CLT:
Theorem 3.3. Let µ be an isotropic log-concave probability measure with strictly
n
P
positive and continuous density on its support. Let µn be the law of n−1/2
Xi ,
i=1
where the Xi are i.i.d. random variables with law µ. Then for any p ≥ 2 we have
Wp (µn , γ) ≤ C̃(p)
d2−2/p
n1/2
with C̃(p) is a constant that depends only on p (and which can be made explicit).
In particular, this estimate does not depend on µ.
7
In the case p = 2, the main result of [8] combined with the best currentlyknown estimate on the Poincaré constant of log-concave measures [22] leads to
a rate of convergence of the form Cd3/4 n−1/2 , which is better than the one we
obtain here. The Kannan-Lovasz-Simonovits conjecture predicts that the Poincaré
constant of isotropic log-concave measures is bounded by some universal
constant,
p
independently of the dimension, so we expect a rate of order d/n. Bonis [5]
proved a general rate of convergence for measures with finite fourth moment, again
when p = 2. In the case p > 2, this result seems to be the first estimate with the
sharp dependence on the number of variables in any dimension. In dimension one,
Bonis [5] and Bobkov [4] obtained the sharp rate in a far more general setting.
In the situation where µ is uniformly log-concave, the uniform estimate on
the operator norm of our Stein kernel leads to an improved dependence on the
dimension:
Theorem 3.4. Let µ = e−V be an isotropic probability measure with strictly
positive and continuous density on its support, and assume that Hess V ≥ ǫ Id for
some ǫ > 0. Then for any p ≥ 2 we have
d3/2−2/p
.
ǫn1/2
Proof of Theorem 3.3. We first work in the situation where µ has a compact sup2 ∗ −1
port and a density bounded away from zero. Let τ =
know is
a
(∇n ϕ ) , which we
n
P
P
Stein kernel for µ. Then as is standard, τn (x) := E n1
τ (Xi ) | √1n
Xi = x
Wp (µn , γ) ≤ C(p)
k=1
k=1
is a Stein kernel for µn . Applying Jensen’s inequality, we have
Z
Z
p
1X
p
τij (xi ) − δij dµ⊗n (x1 , .., xn ),
|(τn )ij − δij | dµn ≤
n
and Rosenthal’s inequality for sums of independent centered random variables [13]
yields
Z
Z
|(τn )ij − δij |p dµn ≤ Kp n−p/2
|τij − δij |p dµ.
We then have, given an orthonormal basis (θ1 , .., θd ) of Rd ,
Z X
p/2
X Z
|τij − δij |2
dµ
|τij − δij |p dµ ≤
i,j
Z X
p/2
≤ 2p dp/2 +
|τij |2
dµ
!p !
Z X
hτ θi , θi i dµ
≤ 2p dp/2 +
i
p/2
≤ C(p) d
(p−1)
+d
≤ C(p)dp (1 + 8p p2p ).
XZ
p
hτ θi , θi i dµ
8
Hence
and therefore
Z
|(τn )ij − δij |p dµn ≤ Kp n−p/2 C(p)dp (1 + 8p p2p ),
(4)
d2−2/p
.
n1/2
For the general case, when the support of µ is not necessarily compact, we
can take a sequence of compact sets Fℓ that converge to the support of µ, and
apply our results to the restriction of µ to Fℓ (renormalized to remain a centered,
isotropic probability measure, so that Fℓ has to be modified to take this into
account, but this modification will remain convex and compact). The estimate on
the Wasserstein distance does not depend on Fℓ , so that we can let ℓ go to infinity
and the result remains valid.
Wp (µn , γ) ≤ C̃(p)
The proof of Theorem 3.4 follows the exact same argument except that we use
the improved bound of Corollary 2.4, so we omit it.
3.1
Proof of Proposition 3.2
We shall now give a proof of Proposition 3.2, omiting many computations taken
from [18, 16]. While it is not written in the same way as in [15], it is the same
proof, and we stress it is not due to us. We describe it in this form so that it is
more easily readable for people with a knowledge of Bakry-Emery calculus
Proof of Proposition 3.2 . We introduce the Hessian metric on Rd given by the
Riemannian metric tensor g = (∇ϕ)−1 . A result of Kolesnikov [18] asserts that
when µ is log-concave and satisfies the regularity conditions of Theorem 2.2, then
the metric-measure space M = (Rd , g, e−ϕ ) has Ricci curvature bounded from
below by 1/2. Moreover, if we consider the Laplacian on M , which is given by the
formula
Lϕ f = Tr(∇2 f (∇ϕ)−1 ) + ∇ log ρ(∇ϕ) · ∇f
then one can check that
2
Lϕ ∂e ϕ = −∂e ϕ; Γ(∂e ϕ) = ∂ee
ϕ;
where Γ is the squared norm of the gradient with respect to the metric g. These
computations can be found in [18, 16]. We can then use tools from Bakry-Émery
theory to obtain estimates on eigenfunctions of the Laplacian for spaces with
positive curvature to deduce the desired bound. Indeed, if we denote by Pt the
semigroup acting on functions induced by Lϕ , we have for any locally-lipschitz
function f
1
Pt (f 2 ),
Γ(Pt f ) ≤
t
2(e − 1)
9
see Theorem 4.7.2 in [2]. Taking f = ∂e ϕ, since it is an eigenfunction of Lϕ
associated to the eigenvalue 1, we have Pt ∂e ϕ = e−t ∂e ϕ. Therefore Γ(Pt f ) =
2 ϕ and for any t > 0 and p ≥ 1 we have
e−2t ∂ee
p
p
1
1
2 p
−2pt 2
p
(Pt ((∂e ϕ) )) ≤
Pt ((∂e ϕ)2p ).
e
(∂ee ϕ) ≤
2(et − 1)
2(et − 1)
Hence after integrating, for any t > 0 we have
p Z
Z
e2t
2
p −ϕ
(∂ee ϕ) e dx ≤
(∂e ϕ)2p e−ϕ dx.
2(et − 1)
Taking t = ln 2, the result then follows from the bound
||f ||2p,e−ϕ ≤ 2p||f ||2,e−ϕ
for any eigenfunction of Lϕ associated with the eigenvalue −1, when a logarithmic
Sobolev inequality with constant 1/2 holds, see Section 5.3 of [2].
4
Transporting Stein kernels for other reference measures
The abstract setup of Stein’s method can be generalized to cover non-gaussian
reference measures. If we wish to compare some measure µ to a reference measure
µ0 = e−V dx, say for a smooth function V that is finite everywhere, then µ0 is
characterized by the integration by parts formula
Z
Z
∇V · f dµ0 = Tr(∇f )dµ0
which leads to a definition of Stein kernel as a matrix-valued function such that
Z
Z
∇V · f dµ = hτ, ∇f idµ.
(5)
Assume that V is convex, C 2 and that Hess V > 0, and let µV be the pushforward of µ by ∇V . Then for any vector-valued smooth function f , defining
g(x) = f (∇V ∗ (x)), we have
Z
Z
∇V (x) · f (x)dµ = ∇V (x) · g(∇V (x))dµ
Z
= x · g(x)dµV ,
10
so if we take τ̃V,γ to be a Stein kernel for µV with respect to the gaussian measure
(assuming for now it exists), we get
Z
Z
∇V (x) · f (x)dµ = hτ̃V,γ , ∇gidµV
Z
= hτ̃V,γ (∇V (x)), ∇g(∇V (x))idµ
Z
= hτ̃V,γ (∇V (x)), (Hess V (x))−1 ∇f (x)idµ
Z
= hτ̃V,γ (∇V (x))(Hess V (x))−1 , ∇f (x)idµ
and therefore τ̃V,γ (∇V (x))(Hess V (x))−1 is a Stein kernel for µ relative to µ0 .
To be valid, in addition to the regularity and convexity assumptions on V , this
arguments requires that τ̃V,γ exists. It is okay if it is only defined in the sense of
distributions (since ∇V is smooth and bijective, composing a distribution with it
is possible).
Acknowledgments : This work was partly made while the author was in
residence at the Institut Henri Poincaré in July 2017, and at the Mathematical
Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley for part of the fall 2017 semester. The
author benefited from support from the France Berkeley Fund, the ANR Project
ANR-17-CE40-0030 - EFI, and ANR-11-LABX-0040-CIMI within the program
ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02. I thank Dimitri Shlyakhtenko for the discussion that
initiated this work, as well as Dario Cordero-Erausquin, Thomas Courtade, Bo’az
Klartag, Michel Ledoux and Emanuel Milman for their advice and comments, and
Adrien Saumard for sharing a preliminary version of [32].
References
[1] H. Airault, P. Malliavin, and F. Viens. Stokes formula on the Wiener space
and n-dimensional Nourdin-Peccati analysis. Journal of Functional Analysis,
258(5):1763–1783, 2010.
[2] D. Bakry, I. Gentil and M. Ledoux, Analysis and geometry of Markov diffusion
operators. Springer, Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol.
348, xx+552 (2014).
[3] R. J. Berman and B. Berndtsson, Real Monge-Ampre equations and KählerRicci solitons on toric log Fano varieties Annales de la faculté des sciences de
Toulouse Sr. 6, 22 no. 4, (2013), p. 649–711.
[4] S. G. Bobkov, Berry-Esseen bounds and Edgeworth expansions in the central
limit theorem for transport distances. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 2017.
[5] T. Bonis, Rates in the Central Limit Theorem and diffusion approximation
via Stein’s Method. Arxiv preprint, 2016.
11
[6] L.A. Caffarelli, Monotonicity properties of optimal transportation and the
FKG and related inequalities. Comm. Math. Phys. 214(3), 547–563 (2000).
[7] S. Chatterjee, Fluctuations of eigenvalues and second order Poincaré inequalities. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 143, 1-40, 2009.
[8] T. Courtade, M. Fathi and A. Pananjady, Existence of Stein kernels via
spectral gap, and discrepancy bounds. to appear in Ann. IHP: Probab. Stat.
(2017).
[9] D. Cordero-Erausquin and B. Klartag, Moment measures, J. Funct. Anal.,
268 (12), 3834–3866, 2015.
[10] G. De Philippis and A. Figalli, W 2,1 regularity for solutions of the MongeAmpère equation. Invent. Math. 192 (2013), no. 1, 55-69.
[11] S. K. Donaldson, Kähler geometry on toric manifolds, and some other manifolds with large symmetry. Handbook of geometric analysis. Adv. Lect. Math.
(ALM), Vol. 7, No. 1, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 29–75, 2008.
[12] A. Figalli, The Monge-Ampre Equation and Its Applications Zurich Lectures
in Advanced Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich,
2017. x+200.
[13] R. Ibragimov and S. Sharahmetov, The Exact Constant in the Rosenthal
Inequality for Random Variables with Mean Zero Teor. Veroyatnost. i Primenen., 2001, Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 134–138.
[14] B. Klartag, Uniform almost sub-gaussian estimates for linear functionals on
convex sets. Algebra i Analiz (St. Petersburg Math. Journal), Vol. 19, No. 1,
109–148 (2007).
[15] B. Klartag, Logarithmically-concave moment measures I. Geometric Aspects
of Functional Analysis, Lecture Notes in Math. 2116, Springer (2014), 231–
260.
[16] B. Klartag and A. Kolesnikov, Remarks on curvature in the transportation
metric. Analysis Math., Vol. 43, No. 1, (2017), 67–88.
[17] A. Kolesnikov, On Sobolev Regularity of Mass Transport and Transportation
Inequalities, Theory of Probability and Its Applications. 2013. Vol. 57. No. 2.
P. 243-264.
[18] A. Kolesnikov, Hessian metrics, CD(K,N)-spaces, and optimal transportation of log-concave measures, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series A. 2014. Vol. 34. No. 4. P. 1511-1532.
[19] A. Kolesnikov and E. Kosov, Moment measures and stability for Gaussian
inequalities. Arxiv preprint, 2018.
12
[20] A. Kolesnikov and E. Milman, Riemannian metrics on convex sets with applications to Poincar and log-Sobolev inequalities. Calculus of Variations and
Partial Differential Equations. 2016. No. 55. P. 77.
[21] M. Ledoux, I. Nourdin and G. Peccati, Stein’s method, logarithmic Sobolev
and transport inequalities Geom. Funct. Anal. 25, 256–306 (2015).
[22] Y.-T. Lee and S. Vempala, Eldan’s stochastic localization and the KLS Hyperplane Conjecture: An Improved Lower Bound for Expansion. Arxiv preprint,
2016.
[23] E. Legendre, Toric Kähler-Einstein metrics and convex compact polytopes,
Journal of Geometric Analysis, 26(1), 399–427, 2016.
[24] C. Ley, G. Reinert and Y. Swan, Approximate computation of expectations:
a canonical Stein operator. to appear in Probability Surveys (2017).
[25] L. Mackey and J. Gorham. Multivariate Stein factors for a class of strongly
logconcave distributions. Electron. Commun. Probab. 21, Paper No. 56, 14
(2016)
[26] I. Nourdin and G. Peccati, Normal approximations with Malliavin calculus:
from Stein’s method to universality. Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[27] I. Nourdin, G. Peccati and A. Réveillac. Multivariate normal approximation using Steins method and Malliavin calculus. Ann. I.H.P. Proba. Stat.,
46(1):45–58, 2010
[28] I. Nourdin, G. Peccati and Y. Swan, Entropy and the fourth moment phenomenon. J. Funct. Anal. 266, no. 5, 3170–3207 (2014).
[29] I. Nourdin and F. G. Viens, Density formula and concentration inequalities
with Malliavin calculus. Electron. J. Probab. 14, no. 78, 22872309 (2009).
[30] N. Ross, Fundamentals of Stein’s method. Probability Surveys Vol. 8 (2011)
210–293.
[31] F. Santambrogio, Dealing with moment measures via entropy and optimal
transport. J. Funct. Anal. 271 (2016), no. 2, 418–436.
[32] A. Saumard, Weighted Poincaré-type inequalities, concentration inequalities
and tail bounds related to the behavior of the Stein kernel in dimension one.
Arxiv preprint (2018).
[33] C. Stein, A bound for the error in the normal approximation to the distribution of a sum of dependent random variables. In Proceedings of the Sixth
Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Univ. California, Berkeley, Calif., 1970/1971), Vol. II: Probability theory, pages 583–
602, Berkeley, Calif., 1972. Univ. California Press.
13
[34] C. Stein. Approximate computation of expectations. Institute of Mathematical Statistics Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, 7. Institute of Mathematical
Statistics, Hayward, CA, 1986.
[35] C. Villani, Topics in optimal transportation. Vol. 58 of Graduate Studies in
Mathematics, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2003.
[36] X.-J. Wang and X. H. Zhu, Kähler-Ricci solitons on toric manifolds with
positive first Chern class, Adv. Math., 188, 47–103, 2004.
| 10math.ST
|
arXiv:1702.00141v1 [math.ST] 1 Feb 2017
Reliability study of proportional odds family of discrete
distributions
Pradip Kundu and Asok K. Nanda∗
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, IISER Kolkata
Mohanpur 741246, India
Abstract
The proportional odds model gives a method of generating new family of distributions by
adding a parameter, called tilt parameter, to expand an existing family of distributions. The
new family of distributions so obtained is known as Marshall-Olkin family of distributions or
Marshall-Olkin extended distributions. In this paper, we consider Marshall-Olkin family of
distributions in discrete case with fixed tilt parameter. We study different ageing properties,
as well as different stochastic orderings of this family of distributions. All the results of this
paper are supported by several examples.
Keywords: Marshall-Olkin extended distribution, Stochastic ageing, Stochastic orders.
1
Introduction
Since the work of Bennett [1] and Pettitt [25] on the proportional odds (PO) model in the
survival analysis context, it has been used by many researchers. The assumption of constant
hazard ratio is unreasonable in many practical cases as discussed by Bennett [1], Kirmani
and Gupta [17] and Rossini and Tsiatis [26]. The PO model has been used by Bennett [1]
to demonstrate the effectiveness of a cure, when the mortality rate of a group having some
disease approaches that of a (disease-free) control group as time progresses. After Bennet’s
[1] work, the PO model has found many practical applications, see, for instance, Collett [4],
Dinse and Lagakos [8], Pettitt [25] and Rossini and Tsiatis [26]. Let X and Y be two random
variables with distribution functions F (·), G(·), survival functions F̄ (·), Ḡ(·), probability density
functions f (·), g(·) and hazard rate functions rX (·) = f (·)/F̄ (·), rY (·) = g(·)/Ḡ(·). Let the odds
functions of X and Y be denoted respectively by θX (t) = F̄ (t)/F (t) and θY (t) = Ḡ(t)/G(t).
The random variables X and Y are said to satisfy PO model with proportionality constant α if
∗
Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
1
θY (t) = αθX (t). For more discussion on PO models one may refer to Kirmani and Gupta [17].
It is observed that, in terms of survival functions, the PO model can be represented as
Ḡ(t) =
αF̄ (t)
,
1 − ᾱF̄ (t)
(1.1)
where ᾱ = 1 − α. From the above representation we have
rY (t)
1
G(t)
=
,
=
rX (t)
F (t)
1 − ᾱF̄ (t)
so that the hazard ratio is increasing (resp. decreasing) for α > 1 (resp. α < 1) and it
convergence to 1 as t tends to ∞. This property of hazard functions makes the PO model
reasonable in many practical applications. This is in contrast to the proportional hazards
model where the ratio of the hazard rates remains constant with time.
The model (1.1), with 0 < α < ∞; gives a method of introducing new parameter α to a family
of distributions for obtaining more flexible new family of distributions as discussed by Marshall
and Olkin [19]. The family of distributions so obtained is known as Marshall-Olkin family
of distributions or Marshall-Olkin extended distributions (for details see [19, 20]). For more
discussion and applications of Marshall-Olkin family of distributions one can see [3, 5, 6, 13].
The parameter α is called ‘tilt parameter’. This is because the hazard rate of the new family is
shifted below or above the hazard rate of the underlying (baseline) distribution for α ≥ 1 and
0 < α ≤ 1 respectively. Thus, Marshall-Olkin family of distributions has implications both in
terms of PO model as well as in generating a new family of flexible distributions, and hence it
is worth to investigate this family of distributions.
Kirmani and Gupta [17] studied some ageing properties of the PO model with fixed tilt
parameter α. Nanda and Das [22] studied different ageing classes of Marshall-Olkin family of
distributions taking the tilt parameter as random variable. Ghitany and Kotz [14] studied the
reliability properties by taking F̄ as the reliability function of the linear failure-rate distribution.
Gupta et al. [16] compared the Marshall-Olkin extended distribution and the original distribution with respect to some stochastic orderings. Nanda and Das [23] compared this family of
distributions with respect to different stochastic orderings by taking the tilt parameter random.
All the studies mentioned above consider the original (baseline) distribution to be continuous.
However, not much work is available in the literature for discrete case. In this paper, we study
different ageing properties, as well as different stochastic orderings of this family of distributions
with discrete baseline distribution and with fixed tilt parameter.
2
Preliminaries
Here we discuss the survival function, the hazard (failure) rate function, and the mean residual
life of a discrete random variable X with support N = {1, 2, ...}. Let the probability mass
2
function (pmf) of X be given by f (k) = P {X = k}, and the distribution function be F (·) so
that the reliability (survival) function F̄ (·) of X becomes
F̄ (k) = P {X > k} =
∞
X
f (j), k = 1, 2, ...,
j=k+1
with F̄ (0) = 1. The failure rate function r(·) (Shaked et al. [28]) is given by
r(k) = P {X = k|X ≥ k} =
P {X = k}
f (k)
=
,
P {X ≥ k}
F̄ (k − 1)
and the reversed hazard rate function is given by r̃(k) = f (k)/F (k). Below we give the definitions of different discrete ageing classes.
Definition 2.1 A discrete random variable X is said to be
(i) ILR (DLR) i.e. increasing (decreasing) in likelihood ratio if f (k) is log-concave (logconvex), i.e. if f (k + 2)f (k) ≤ (≥) f 2 (k + 1), k ∈ N (Dewan and Sudheesh [9]);
(ii) IFR (DFR) i.e. increasing (decreasing) failure rate if r(k) is increasing (decreasing) in
k ∈ N. This is equivalent to the fact that F̄ (k + 1)/F̄ (k) is decreasing (increasing) in
k ∈ N (Salvia and Bollinger [27], Shaked et al. [28], Gupta et al. [15]);
(iii) IFRA (DFRA) i.e. increasing (decreasing) in failure rate average if [F̄ (k)]1/k is decreasing
(increasing) in k, i.e., [F̄ (k)]1/k ≥ (≤) [F̄ (k + 1)]1/(k+1) , k ∈ N (Esary et al. [10], Shaked
et al. [28]);
(iv) NBU (NWU) i.e. new better (worse) than used if F̄ (j + k) ≤ (≥) F̄ (j)F̄ (k), j, k ∈ N
(Esary et al. [10], Shaked et al. [28]);
(v) DRHR (decreasing reversed hazard rate) if r̃(k) is decreasing in k, i.e. if F (k) is logconcave, i.e. if [F (k + 1)]2 ≥ F (k)F (k + 2), k ∈ N (Nanda and Sengupta [24], Li and Xu
[18]).
(vi) NBAFR (new better than used in failure rate average) if [F̄ (k)]1/k ≤ F̄ (1), k ∈ N (Fagiuoli
and Pellerey [11]).
2.1
Proportional odds family of discrete distributions
Let X be a discrete random variable with support N = {1, 2, ...} having pmf f (·), distribution
function F (·), survival function F̄ (·), hazard rate function rX (·), and reversed hazard rate
function r̃X (·). Starting with the survival function F̄ , the survival function of the proportional
odds family (also known as Marshall-Olkin family) of discrete distribution is given by
Ḡ(k; α) =
αF̄ (k)
, k = 1, 2, ..., 0 < α < ∞, ᾱ = 1 − α,
1 − ᾱF̄ (k)
3
(2.1)
with Ḡ(0; α) = 1. Let the corresponding random variable be denoted by Y . Now the distribution
function of Y is given by
G(k; α) = 1 − Ḡ(k; α) =
F (k)
,
1 − ᾱF̄ (k)
(2.2)
whereas the pmf is given by
g(k; α) = Ḡ(k − 1; α) − Ḡ(k; α) =
αf (k)
.
[1 − ᾱF̄ (k − 1)][1 − ᾱF̄ (k)]
(2.3)
The corresponding hazard rate and the reversed hazard rate functions are given by
rX (k)
,
1 − ᾱF̄ (k)
(2.4)
αr̃X (k)
.
1 − ᾱF̄ (k − 1)
(2.5)
rY (k; α) =
r̃Y (k; α) =
It is to be mentioned here that different properties of (2.1) have been studied by Déniz and
Sarabia [7] by taking F as the cdf of Poisson random variable.
3
Stochastic Ageing properties
In this section we study how different ageing properties of X are transmitted to the random
variable Y .
With the following two counterexamples, one with α > 1 and the other with α < 1, we show
that if X is ILR, then Y is neither ILR nor DLR.
Counterexample 3.1 Consider the random variable X with the mass function given by
0,
if k = 1;
0.1, if k = 2;
f (k) =
0.25, if k = 3;
0.35, if k = 4;
0.3, if k = 5.
Clearly X is ILR. For α = 5, we have the mass function of Y as
0,
if k = 1;
1
if k = 2;
46 ,
125
g(k; 5) =
1656 , if k = 3;
175
792
, if k = 4;
15 ,
if k = 5.
22
It is observed that Y is neither ILR nor DLR.
4
Counterexample 3.2 Consider the random variable X with mass function given by
0,
if k = 1;
0.3, if k = 2;
f (k) =
0.34, if k = 3;
0.26, if k = 4;
0.1, if k = 5.
Here X is ILR. For α = 0.2, we have the mass function of Y as
0,
if k = 1;
15
if k = 2;
22 ,
425
g(k; 0.2) =
1958 , if k = 3;
325
4094 , if k = 4;
1,
if k = 5.
46
It is observed that Y is neither ILR nor DLR.
✷
With the following two counterexamples, one for α > 1 and the other for α < 1, we show
that if X is DLR, then Y is neither DLR nor ILR.
Counterexample 3.3 Consider the random variable X with mass function given by
0.36, if k = 1;
0.26, if k = 2;
f (k) =
0.21, if k = 3;
0.17, if k = 4.
Here X is DLR. For α = 2, we have the mass function of Y as
9
if k = 1;
41 ,
650 , if k = 2;
2829
g(k; 2) =
700
2691 , if k = 3;
34
if k = 4.
117 ,
It is observed that Y is neither DLR nor ILR.
Counterexample 3.4 Consider the random variable X with mass function given by
0.26, if k = 1;
0.18, if k = 2;
f (k) =
0.24, if k = 3;
0.32, if k = 4.
5
Here X is DLR. For α = 0.4, we have the mass function of Y as
65
if k = 1;
139 ,
2250 , if k = 2;
11537
g(k; 0.4) =
1500
if k = 3;
8383 ,
16
if k = 4.
101 ,
It is observed that Y is neither DLR nor ILR.
✷
The following theorem gives the condition under which IFR/DFR property of X is transmit
ted to the random variable Y . The proof follows from the fact that 1/ 1 − ᾱF̄ (k) is increasing
(resp. decreasing) in k for α ≥ (resp. ≤)1.
Theorem 3.1 If X is IFR (resp. DFR) and α ≥ (resp. ≤) 1, then Y is IFR (resp. DFR). ✷
The following counterexample shows that if α < 1, then the IFR property of X may not be
transmitted to the random variable Y .
Counterexample 3.5 Consider the random variable X following discrete IFR distribution (cf.
Salvia and Bollinger [27]) with
f (k) = (k − c)ck−1 /k!, k ∈ N, 0 < c ≤ 1.
Here F̄ (k) = ck /k! and rX (k) = 1 − c/k so that X is IFR. Now
rY (k; α) =
1 − c/k
.
1 − ᾱck /k!
It is observed that, for c = 0.8 and α = 0.2, we have rY (2; 0.2) = 0.8064516, rY (3; 0.2) =
0.7870635, and rY (4; 0.2) = 0.8110739. This shows that Y is neither IFR nor DFR.
✷
The following counterexample shows that the DFR property of X may not be transmitted
to the random variable Y when α > 1.
Counterexample 3.6 Let X follow the Type I discrete Weibull distribution (cf. Nakagawa
and Osaki [21]) with pmf given by
β
β
f (k) = q (k−1) − q k , k ∈ N, q ∈ (0, 1), β > 0.
β
Then the corresponding survival function is given by F̄ (k) = q k , and the hazard rate function
is given by rX (k) = 1 − q k
β −(k−1)β
. Here X is DFR for 0 < β < 1. Note that
β
β
1 − q k −(k−1)
rY (k; α) =
.
1 − ᾱq kβ
It is observed that, for β = 0.8, α = 5 and q = 0.5, we have rY (7; 5) = 0.2759209, rY (10; 5) =
0.2834942, and rY (13; 5) = 0.2793229. This shows that Y is neither DFR nor IFR.
6
✷
Below we see that, for α ≥ (resp. ≤) 1, the NBU (resp. NWU) property of X is transmitted
to the random variable Y .
Theorem 3.2 If X is NBU (resp. NWU) and α ≥ (resp. ≤) 1, then Y is NBU (resp. NWU).
Proof: Let X be NBU (resp. NWU). Then Y will be NBU (resp. NWU) if and only if
1 − ᾱF̄ (j + k)
(1 − ᾱF̄ (j))(1 − ᾱF̄ (k))
≥ (resp. ≤)
.
F̄ (j + k)
αF̄ (j)F̄ (k)
This is equivalent to the fact that
1 − ᾱ F̄ (j) + F̄ (k) + ᾱF̄ (k)F̄ (j)
1
,
≥ (resp. ≤)
αF̄ (j)F̄ (k)
F̄ (j + k)
which holds if
1
1
≥ (resp. ≤)
.
F̄ (j + k)
F̄ (j)F̄ (k)
The last inequality follows from the fact that, for α ≥ (resp. ≤) 1,
1 − ᾱ F̄ (j) + F̄ (k) + ᾱF̄ (k)F̄ (j) ≤ (resp. ≥) α.
Hence the theorem follows.
✷
The following counterexamples show that, for α < (resp. >) 1, the NBU (resp. NWU)
property of X may not be transmitted to the random variable Y .
Counterexample 3.7 Consider X following the discrete S-distribution (cf. Bracuemond and
Gaudoin [2]) with pmf given by
f (k) = p(1 − ak )
k−1
Y
(1 − p + pai ), k ∈ N, 0 < p ≤ 1, 0 < a < 1.
i=1
This gives the survival function as F̄ (k) =
rX (k) = p(1 − ak ). Here X is NBU. Now
Ḡ(k; α) =
α
Qk
i=1 (1
Qk
1 − ᾱ
i=1
Q
k
− p + pai ), and hazard rate function as
(1 − p + pai )
i=1 (1
− p + pai )
.
For j = 2, k = 3, p = 0.3, a = 0.6, α = 0.2, we have Ḡ(j + k; α) = 0.075737 and
Ḡ(j; α)Ḡ(k; α) = 0.063494. This shows that Y is not NBU.
Counterexample 3.8 Let X follow the distribution as given in Counterexample 3.6. Then
clearly X is NWU for β ∈ (0, 1). Now, for j = 2, k = 3, α = 5, q = 0.5, we have Ḡ(j + k; α) =
0.3062174 and Ḡ(j; α)Ḡ(k; α) = 0.3657684. This shows that Y is not NWU.
7
✷
Kirmani and Gupta [17] have observed that if X is IFRA (DFRA), then Y is IFRA (DFRA)
for α > (<) 1. Below we show that if X is IFRA, then Y may not be IFRA or DFRA when
α < 1.
Counterexample 3.9 Let X follow the distribution as given in Counterexample 3.7. Here X
is IFRA. Now, for α = 0.2, p = 0.5, and a = 0.6, we have
0.44444, for k = 1;
1/k
[Ḡ(k; 0.2)]
=
0.438901, for k = 2;
0.457806, for k = 4.
This shows that Y is neither IFRA nor DFRA.
✷
Below we show that if X is DFRA, then, for α > 1, Y may not be DFRA or IFRA.
Counterexample 3.10 Let X follow the discrete Pareto distribution with survival function
c
d
, k ∈ N, c, d > 0,
F̄ (k) =
k+d
which is DFR and hence DFRA. Now
α
Ḡ(k; α) =
1 − ᾱ
d
k+d
c
d
k+d
c .
For α = 6, d = 2, c = 3, we have
[Ḡ(k; 6)]1/k =
0.7164179, for k = 1;
0.658037,
0.68081,
for k = 4;
for k = 8,
which is neither increasing nor decreasing in k, i.e. Y is neither DFRA nor IFRA.
✷
Following theorem shows that, for α ≤ 1, the DRHR property of X is transmitted to the
random variable Y . The proof follows from the fact that 1/ 1 − ᾱF̄ (k − 1) is decreasing in k,
for α ≤ 1.
Theorem 3.3 If X is DRHR, then Y is DRHR for α ≤ 1.
✷
The following counterexample shows that, for α > 1, DRHR property of X may not be
transmitted to the random variable Y .
Counterexample 3.11 Consider the random
0,
4
25 ,
2
F (k) =
5,
2
3,
1,
variable X having distribution function given by
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
if k ≥ 5.
8
Clearly X is DRHR. For α = 4, the distribution
0,
1
22 ,
1
G(k; 4) =
7,
31 ,
1,
function of Y is given by
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
if k ≥ 5,
which is not DRHR.
✷
The following counterexample shows that, for α < 1, NBAFR property of X may not be
transmitted to the random variable Y .
Counterexample 3.12 Consider the random
4
5,
8,
13
F̄ (k) =
1
2,
0,
variable X with reliability function given by
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if k ≥ 4.
Here X is NBAFR. For α = 0.4, we have the reliability function of Y as
8
13 , if 1 ≤ k < 2;
16 , if 2 ≤ k < 3;
41
Ḡ(k; 0.4) =
2
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
7,
0, if k ≥ 4.
It is clear that Y is not NBAFR.
✷
We summarize the above findings in Table 1.
4
Stochastic Orderings
Let X1 and X2 be two discrete random variables with support N = {1, 2, ...} having respective
pmf f1 (·), f2 (·), distribution function F1 (·), F2 (·), and survival function F̄1 (·), F̄2 (·). Let the
survival function of the Marshall-Olkin family of discrete distributions be given by
Ḡi (k; α) =
αF̄i (k)
, 0 < α < ∞, ᾱ = 1 − α,
1 − ᾱF̄i (k)
and let the corresponding random variable be Yi , i = 1, 2. The following theorem shows that
the usual stochastic order between X1 and X2 and that of Y1 and Y2 are equivalent.
Theorem 4.1 Y1 ≤st Y2 if and only if X1 ≤st X2 .
9
Table 1: Preservation of ageing classes
Ageing properties
α<1
α>1
ILR
Not Preserved
Not Preserved
DLR
Not Preserved
Not Preserved
IFR
Not Preserved
Preserved
DFR
Preserved
Not Preserved
NBU
Not Preserved
Preserved
NWU
Preserved
Not Preserved
IFRA
Not Preserved
Preserved
DFRA
Preserved
Not Preserved
DRHR
Preserved
Not Preserved
NBAFR
Not Preserved
Proof: Note that Y1 ≤st Y2 if, and only if
αF̄1 (k)
1 − ᾱF̄1 (k)
αF̄2 (k)
,
1 − ᾱF̄2 (k)
≤
which is equivalent to the fact that F̄1 (k) ≤ F̄2 (k). Hence the theorem follows.
✷
The following theorem gives condition on α, under which hazard rate order between X1 and
X2 is transmitted to that between Y1 and Y1 .
Theorem 4.2 If X1 ≤hr X2 , then Y1 ≤hr Y2 , provided α ≥ 1.
Proof: Since hazard rate order is stronger than usual stochastic order, we have, for α ≥ 1,
1
1
≥
.
1 − ᾱF̄1 (k)
1 − ᾱF̄2 (k)
Now, using the hypothesis we have, from (2.4),
rY1 (k; α) =
rX2 (k)
rX1 (k)
≥
= rY2 (k; α).
1 − ᾱF̄1 (k)
1 − ᾱF̄2 (k)
Hence the theorem follows.
✷
The following counterexample shows that the above theorem does not hold if α < 1.
Counterexample 4.1 Consider the random variables X1 and X2 with respective reliability
function
1,
1,
2
F̄1 (k) =
2
5,
0,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if k ≥ 4,
10
and
1,
5,
8
F̄2 (k) =
11 ,
20
0,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if k ≥ 4.
This shows that X1 ≤hr X2 . For α = 0.2, we have the respective reliability function of Y1 and
Y2 as
and
This shows that Y1 hr Y2 .
1,
1,
6
Ḡ1 (k; α) =
2
17 ,
0,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
1,
1,
4
Ḡ2 (k; α) =
11 ,
56
0,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if k ≥ 4,
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if k ≥ 4.
✷
The following theorem gives the condition on α such that reversed hazard rate order between
X1 and X2 is transmitted to that between Y1 and Y2 .
Theorem 4.3 If X1 ≤rhr X2 , then Y1 ≤rhr Y2 , for 0 < α ≤ 1.
Proof: Since reversed hazard rate order is stronger than usual stochastic order, we have, for
α ≤ 1,
1
1
≤
.
1 − ᾱF̄1 (k − 1)
1 − ᾱF̄2 (k − 1)
Now, using the hypothesis we have, from (2.5),
r̃Y1 (k; α) =
αr̃X1 (k)
αr̃X2 (k)
≤
= r̃Y2 (k; α).
¯
1 − ᾱF1 (k − 1)
1 − ᾱF¯2 (k − 1)
Hence the theorem follows.
✷
That the above theorem does not hold in case of α > 1 is shown in the following counterexample.
Counterexample 4.2 Consider the random variables X1 and X2 with respective distribution
function
0,
5
24 ,
1
F1 (k) =
2,
3
4,
1,
11
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
if k ≥ 5,
and
F2 (k) =
0,
1
6,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
5
12 ,
2
3,
1,
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
if k ≥ 5.
Clearly X1 ≤rhr X2 . For α = 4, we have the distribution functions of Y1 and Y2 respectively as
0, if 1 ≤ k < 2;
5
81 , if 2 ≤ k < 3;
1
G1 (k; 4) =
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
5,
3
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
7,
1, if k ≥ 5,
and
This shows that Y1 rhr Y2 .
0,
1
21 ,
5
G2 (k; 4) =
33 ,
1
3,
1,
if 1 ≤ k < 2;
if 2 ≤ k < 3;
if 3 ≤ k < 4;
if 4 ≤ k < 5;
if k ≥ 5.
✷
Following two counterexamples show that the likelihood ratio order between X1 and X2 is
not necessarily transmitted to that between Y1 and Y2 .
Counterexample 4.3 Let X1 and X2 have
f1 (k) =
and
f2 (k) =
the respective probability mass function
0,
if k = 1;
0.3, if k = 2;
0.4, if k = 3;
0.2, if k = 4;
0.1, if k = 5,
0,
if k = 1;
0.2, if k = 2;
0.3, if k = 3;
0.2, if k = 4;
0.3, if k = 5.
12
Clearly X1 ≤lr X2 . For α = 5, we have the mass functions of Y1 and Y2 respectively as
0,
if k = 1;
3
38 , if k = 2;
50
g1 (k; 5) =
209 , if k = 3;
25
if k = 4;
77 ,
5 , if k = 5,
14
and
0,
1
21 ,
5
g2 (k; 5) =
42 ,
5
33 ,
15 ,
22
This shows that Y1 lr Y2 .
if k = 1;
if k = 2;
if k = 3;
if k = 4;
if k = 5.
✷
Counterexample 4.4 Take the random variables X1 and X2 having respective mass functions
0,
if k = 1;
0.3, if k = 2;
f1 (k) =
0.3, if k = 3;
0.2, if k = 4;
0.2, if k = 5,
and
0,
0.2,
f2 (k) =
0.3,
0.24,
0.26,
if k = 1;
if k = 2;
if k = 3;
if k = 4;
if k = 5.
Clearly X1 ≤lr X2 . For α = 0.2, we have the mass functions of Y1 and Y2 as
0,
if k = 1;
15
22 , if k = 2;
75
g1 (k; 0.2) =
374 , if k = 3;
25
357 , if k = 4;
1 , if k = 5,
21
13
and
g2 (k; 0.2) =
This shows that Y1 lr Y2 .
0,
5
9,
5
18 ,
10
99 ,
13
198 ,
if k = 1;
if k = 2;
if k = 3;
if k = 4;
if k = 5.
✷
We summarize the above findings in Table 2.
Table 2: Preservation of stochastic orderings
Stochastic orders between
α<1
α>1
baseline distributions
5
Usual stochastic order
Preserved
Preserved
Hazard rate order
Not Preserved
Preserved
Reversed hazard rate order
Preserved
Not Preserved
Likelihood ratio order
Not Preserved
Not Preserved
Conclusion
Marshall and Olkin [19] introduced a method of adding a new parameter, called tilt parameter,
to a family of distributions for obtaining more flexible new families of distributions. In the
literature, some reliability properties of this family of distributions are studied with continuous baseline distributions. However, not much study is done in the literature, to the best
of our knowledge, for discrete baseline distributions. This paper discusses various stochastic
ageing properties, as well as different stochastic orderings of this family with discrete baseline
distributions.
Acknowledgements:
The support received from IISER Kolkata to carry out this research work is gratefully acknowledged by Pradip Kundu. The financial support from NBHM, Govt. of India (vide Ref. No.
2/48(25)/2014/NBHM(R.P.)/R&D II/1393 dt. Feb. 3, 2015) is duly acknowledged by Asok K.
Nanda.
14
References
[1] S. Bennett, Analysis of survival data by the proportional odds model, Statistics in Medicine
2 (1983) 273-277.
[2] C. Bracquemond, O. Gaudoin, A survey on discrete lifetime distributions, International
Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 10(1) (2003) 69-98.
[3] C. Caroni, Testing for the Marshall-Olkin extended form of the Weibull distribution, Statistical Papers 51 (2010) 325-336.
[4] D. Collett, Modelling survival data in medical research, 2nd edition, Chapman and
Hall/CRC, 2004.
[5] G.M. Cordeiro, A.J. Lemonte, E.M.M. Ortega, The Marshall-Olkin family of distributions:
mathematical properties and new models, Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 8(2)
(2014) 343-366.
[6] G.M. Cordeiro, A.J. Lemonte, On the Marshall-Olkin extended Weibull distribution, Statistical Papers 54(2) (2013) 333-353.
[7] E.G. Déniz, J.M. Sarabia, A discrete distribution including the Poisson, Communications
in Statistics - Theory and Methods 45(8) (2016) 2311-2322.
[8] G.E. Dinse, S.W. Lagakos, Regression analysis of tumour prevalence data, Applied Statistics 32(3) (1983) 236-248.
[9] I. Dewan, K.K. Sudheesh, Ageing concepts for discrete data- A relook, In: Proceedings of
the IEEE International Conference on Quality and Reliability, Bangkok, Thailand, 2011.
[10] J.D. Esary, A.W. Marshall, F. Proschan, Shock models and wear processes, The Annals of
Probability 1(4) (1973) 627-649.
[11] E. Fagiuoli, F. Pellerey, Preservation of certain classes of life distributions under Poisson
shock models, Journal of Applied Probability 31 (1994) 458-465.
[12] M.E. Ghitany, E.K. Al-Hussaini, R.A. Al-Jarallah, Marshall-Olkin extended Weibull distribution and its application to censored data, Journal of Applied Statistics 32(10) (2005)
1025-1034.
[13] M.E. Ghitany, F.A. Al-Awadhi, L.A. Alkhalfan, Marshall-Olkin extended Lomax distribution and its application to censored data, Communications in Statistics - Theory and
Methods 36(10) (2007) 1855-1866.
15
[14] M.E. Ghitany, S. Kotz, Reliability properties of extended linear failure rate distributions,
Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences 21 (2007) 441-450.
[15] P.L. Gupta, R.C. Gupta, R.C. Tripathi, On the monotonic properties of discrete failure
rates, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 65 (1997) 255-268.
[16] R.C. Gupta, S. Lvin, C. Peng, Estimating turning points of the failure rate of the extended
Weibull distribution, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 54 (2010) 924-934.
[17] S.N.U.A. Kirmani, R.C. Gupta, On the proportional odds model in survival analysis,
Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 53(2) (2001) 203-216.
[18] X. Li, M. Xu, Reversed hazard rate order of equilibrium distributions and a related ageing
notion, Statistical Papers 49 (2008) 749-767.
[19] A.W. Marshall, I. Olkin, A new method of adding a parameter to a family of distributions
with applications to the exponential and Weibull families, Biometrika 84 (1997) 641-652.
[20] A.W. Marshall, I. Olkin, Life Distributions. Springer, New York, 2007.
[21] T. Nakagawa, S. Osaki, The Discrete Weibull Distribution, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, R-24(5) (1975) 300-301.
[22] A.K. Nanda, S. Das, Some ageing properties of Marshall-Olkin extended distribution,
International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 13(1) (2013) 93-107.
[23] A.K. Nanda, S. Das, Stochastic orders of the Marshall-Olkin extended distribution, Statistics and Probability Letters 82 (2012) 295-302.
[24] A.K. Nanda, D. Sengupta, Discrete life distributions with decreasing reversed hazard,
Sankhyā 55 (2005) 164-168.
[25] A.N. Pettitt, Proportional odds models for survival data and estimates using ranks, Applied
Statistics 33(2) (1984) 169-175.
[26] A.J. Rossini, A.A. Tsiatis, A Semiparametric proportional odds regression model for the
analysis of current status data, Journal of the American Statistical Association 91(434)
(1996) 713-721.
[27] A.A. Salvia, R.C. Bollinger, On discrete hazard functions, IEEE Transactions on Reliability
31 (5) (1982) 458-459.
[28] M. Shaked, J.G. Shanthikumar, J.B. Valdez-Torres, Discrete hazard rate functions, Computers and Operations Research 22 (4) (1995) 391-402.
16
| 10math.ST
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.